Oral History of William David "Bill" Mensch Jr.

Oral History of William David "Bill" Mensch Jr. — Computer History Museum

Computer History Museum

AI-assisted summary of Oral History of William David "Bill" Mensch Jr. — original source. Check the original for full context.

Source published:

Detailed notes

## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=6s) Growing Up in "Pleasant Poverty" in Rural Pennsylvania

Steve Diamond opens the interview at the Computer History Museum on November 10, 2014, introducing Bill Mensch for an oral history spanning his youth, his education, and his entry into the semiconductor industry. Bill begins by describing his upbringing on a dairy farm in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, roughly 35 miles north of Philadelphia. The farm was intensely rural and supported a herd of about 26 dairy cattle. Bill was the middle child among eight siblings, which naturally encouraged him to spend his time outside exploring rather than being cooped up inside the house.

The family lived in what Bill characterizes as "pleasant poverty," where survival and income depended entirely on the farm's small herd. The family had a radio and gathered eagerly around it to listen to *The Lone Ranger* as soon as the evening milking was finished, eventually acquiring a television when Bill was around ten years old. His father ran the farm as a small business passed down from Bill's grandfather. Bill later discovered that his father had harbored unfulfilled ambitions of attending Drexel University to become an electrical engineer. Looking back at his beginnings, Bill saw little early indication that he would one day make a career in high technology, remarking, “When you look at my past, I don't think there's many indications that I'd be sitting here talking to you.”

- Setting: Bucks County, Pennsylvania, approximately 35 miles north of Philadelphia. - Family dynamic: Middle child among eight children. - Farm operations: 26 head of dairy cattle providing the primary family income. - Paternal influence: His father operated the inherited family farm but had originally aspired to study electrical engineering at Drexel.

---

[02:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=160s) From Farm Laborer to College Student

Bill did not grow up harboring ambitions of becoming an engineer; instead, he expected to spend his life as a manual laborer. Life on a working farm revolved around concrete, demanding physical tasks: plowing fields, cutting and baling hay, hauling it to the barn, and milking cows every morning and evening. Because of this background, he loved physical work and the outdoors, never picturing himself working in an office environment.

When he took academic classes in high school, it was merely out of personal interest in math and science rather than a grand career design. He disliked subjects like English, history, and social studies because they lacked concrete certainty. In English, if an instructor asked what a poet meant, Bill felt the only logical person to ask was the poet. Math and science, by contrast, provided real, unambiguous answers. When his high school guidance counselor informed him at age eighteen that his coursework had prepared him for college, Bill was taken aback, as nobody in his family had ever attended college before. His initial exposure to electrical equipment came from his father, who kept electronics magazines around the house and had wired an industrial ship circuit breaker to a tractor-driven generator to keep the farm's milk coolers running during power outages.

---

[05:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=319s) Temple University and Early Employment at Polyphase

Bill enrolled in an engineering technology program at Temple University, focusing on applied equipment operation rather than foundational physics or theory. His initial motivation was straightforward: earn a credential, land a technician role, and make more money than he would as a common laborer. That assumption was quickly shattered once he entered the workforce. While working for construction contractor Henkels & McCoy, Bill had been pulling in about $150 a week with overtime, but his first technician jobs offered only around $85 a week. Realizing that an associate-level technology background would not provide the financial return he needed, Bill decided to pursue a full engineering degree, later explaining, “I decided to be an engineer to pay my mom back.”

After completing his studies and fulfilling military training obligations for the Army National Guard, Bill took his first post-college job in the spring of 1967 at Polyphase. Located in Bridgeport, Pennsylvania, across the Schuylkill River from Norristown, the company operated out of a grim, aging factory. Bill took the position on the recommendation of a friend who collected a $100 referral bonus for bringing him on board. Bill found the work and setting thoroughly depressing, leading him to quit after just three months without having another job lined up.

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: Bill Mensch Early Educational and Employment Path accDescr: Sequence diagram tracking Bill Mensch's transitions from farm life through early employment and education. A["Bucks County Farm<br/>(Agricultural Labor)"] --> B["Temple University<br/>(Engineering Technology)"] B --> C["Army National Guard<br/>(Military Training)"] C --> D["Polyphase<br/>(3-month tenure)"] D --> E["Philco-Ford<br/>(Semiconductor Lab)"] ```

---

[07:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=445s) Entry into Semiconductors at Philco-Ford and Moving West

Leaving Polyphase led Bill to Philco-Ford, an experience that marked his formal introduction to semiconductors. Ford had acquired Philco largely to secure automotive electronics, and the enterprise had also absorbed General Microelectronics (GMe), a pioneer in commercial MOS integrated circuits. At Philco-Ford, Bill encountered cutting-edge systems, such as a jet engine controller built using memory arrays and eight 1,024-bit ROM chips. Working as a technician, he analyzed the physical properties of solid-state devices: measuring transistor cutoff frequencies ($f_T$) and testing the thermal coefficients of voltage regulators mounted onto heat sinks.

Intrigued by semiconductor physics, Bill enrolled in night school at Villanova University, taking four engineering courses to prove to himself that he could handle a rigorous engineering curriculum. After doing well, he sought to transfer his roughly 109 credits from Temple toward a full bachelor's degree, hoping to finish within one or two years. When the local institution refused to accept his transfer credits, Bill decided to leave Pennsylvania for Arizona, inspired by a fraternity brother who had moved west. While his fraternity brother went to Arizona State University, Bill enrolled at the University of Arizona in Tucson.

- Philco-Ford exposure: Hands-on work with MOS technology stemming from the General Microelectronics acquisition, including 1,024-bit ROMs. - Technical duties: Measuring device physics, high-frequency cutoff parameters ($f_T$), and thermal transfer from semiconductor die packages to heat sinks. - Academic pivot: Completed four engineering courses at Villanova night school before moving to the University of Arizona after Temple credits failed to transfer.

---

[09:41](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=581s) Targeting Motorola and the Campus Interview

While working in Philco-Ford's television and consumer radio division, Bill observed that the engineering team spent considerable time reverse-engineering and evaluating Motorola's high-voltage circuit designs and breakdown voltages. Recognizing that companies only dissect the work of the market leaders rather than the followers, Bill resolved that Motorola was the benchmark in the industry and made it his definitive career objective upon graduation.

Bill finished his electrical engineering degree at the University of Arizona in two years. The program was rigorous, with professors actively writing the textbooks used in the curriculum, including early coursework in systems engineering. During his senior year, campus interview guidelines required spring graduates to sign up only during spring interview sessions. However, when the fall recruitment schedules were posted, Bill noticed that Motorola's interview sheet was completely empty because of their strict minimum requirement of a 3.3 grade point average. Possessing the required 3.3 GPA and unwilling to wait, Bill disregarded the schedule rules and signed his name on the empty sheet. Motorola's head of college recruiting, Jerry Fulton, arrived on campus and conducted the interview, starting an engaging conversation that paved the way for Bill's recruitment alongside Motorola manager Jack Hennison.

- Competitive insight: Observing Philco analyze Motorola's high-voltage TV circuits convinced Bill that “Motorola was the leader, so I wanted to work for a leader.” - Degree completion: Earned his engineering degree at the University of Arizona in two years. - Interview initiative: Took advantage of an empty fall interview slot reserved for students with a 3.3+ GPA despite being scheduled for spring graduation.

[12:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=735s) Landing the Motorola Job Despite a Rejection Letter

While wrapping up his engineering degree at the University of Arizona, Bill Mensch interviewed for post-graduation positions. He had an existing connection at Motorola: an executive who had previously worked at Philco-Ford two levels above Mensch's former boss. During on-campus recruitment, Mensch met with Motorola recruiter Jerry Fulton. Because Mensch already possessed two years of practical industry experience alongside his engineering technology background and degree, Fulton was eager to recruit him, telling him, “We got a job for you, partner.”

However, the formal spring campus interview did not go smoothly. Mensch walked out halfway through, assuming his earlier conversation with the hiring manager had already secured the role. When job offers arrived that spring, Mensch received offers from Martin Marietta in Denver and NCR in California for computer engineering roles. Confident in Motorola, he promptly declined both:

> “I promptly put it back in the mail, thanks but no thanks.”

When the long-awaited letter from Motorola finally arrived, signed by Fulton, it was an outright rejection stating they had no open positions. Panicked at having turned down his other options, Mensch remarked, “I want to jump in the mailbox to get back those other letters.” Instead, he telephoned Fulton immediately to clear up the confusion:

> “Jerry, you signed it.”

Fulton quickly brushed it off as an administrative blunder:

> “Oh Bill, there's a mistake, throw that away... That's a mistake, throw it away, there's another letter coming.”

With that phone call, Mensch secured his position at Motorola.

[14:31](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=871s) The Motorola Rotational Training Program and Early MOS Insights

At the time, Motorola ran a prestigious one-year training program consisting of four three-month rotations across different corporate divisions. Trainees were treated exceptionally well because the corporate training department covered their salaries, effectively granting host departments free engineering labor. Mensch used the opportunity to gain a comprehensive understanding of the entire company, intentionally tailoring his rotations across marketing, design, processing, and application engineering.

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: Bill Mensch Motorola Training Rotations accDescr: Four three-month rotations taken by Bill Mensch at Motorola spanning applications, circuit design, process development, and marketing.

subgraph Phase1["Rotation 1"] A["Applications & Marketing<br/>(MC6860 Modem Flowcharting)"] end subgraph Phase2["Rotation 2"] B["MOS Circuit Design<br/>(Modem Circuit Implementation)"] end subgraph Phase3["Rotation 3"] C["Process Engineering<br/>(MECL III Bipolar Modeling)"] end subgraph Phase4["Rotation 4"] D["Marketing & Economics<br/>(IBM Memory Yield Modeling)"] end

A --> B --> C --> D ```

- **Rotation 1: Applications Engineering (Marketing):** Mensch worked on the MC6860 low-speed 300-baud modem integrated circuit, collaborating with a consultant from modem manufacturer Anderson Jacobson. He created flowcharts and specified the circuit building blocks required to implement the modem architecture on silicon. - **Rotation 2: Circuit Design:** Moving directly into the design group, Mensch spent three months designing the actual circuits he had specified during his first rotation. - **Strategic pivot toward MOS:** Mensch recognized that metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) field-effect transistors (FETs) represented the future of integrated circuits. Bipolar technology, while the fastest at the time, was current-controlled and inherently slower when scaled, whereas FETs were voltage-controlled devices with superior performance scaling:

> “MOS was the future... The bipolar process was slower switching if you go to the highest performing circuits were going to be voltage control which is the FET.”

[17:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=1020s) Bipolar Process Modeling and Marketing Foreknowledge

Because a dedicated MOS process engineering slot was unavailable for his third rotation, Mensch joined the bipolar processing group handling MECL (Motorola Emitter-Coupled Logic), then the fastest switching logic family in the world. He worked on a triple-diffused process for MECL III, which involved diffusing the collector, base, and emitter directly into a bulk silicon background. Balancing junction depths was an exacting task; an improper emitter diffusion would punch through the thin base layer into the collector, creating a diode or a dead short.

To solve this, Mensch automated a process manual written by Motorola engineer Jim Dunkley: - He wrote a suite of five computer programs to simulate ion diffusion over variable times and temperatures. - The software modeled diffusion profiles to prevent emitter punch-through and accurately predicted breakdown voltages and junction characteristics.

For his fourth rotation, Mensch entered marketing to learn the business economics of semiconductors. Tasked with preparing a complex, multi-variable price quote for IBM, he modeled memory pricing over a seven-year learning curve spanning seven volume tiers and seven memory densities (producing a dense matrix across seven pages). Anticipating that administrative staff would struggle to type the massive table accurately, Mensch wrote a custom FORTRAN spreadsheet application to automate the pricing matrix: - He executed the program on a Texas Instruments Silent 700 terminal. - Because the Silent 700 printed on fragile, rolled thermal paper, he photocopied the generated output onto standard office paper to deliver a clean submission for IBM.

[19:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=1182s) A North Scottsdale Tornado and Entering the MOS Logic Group

By the end of his training program, Mensch had proven himself across diverse disciplines and collected five distinct full-time job offers from the departments he had rotated through, plus an offer from the high-voltage bipolar TV circuits group, which coveted his junction-breakdown modeling skills. Mensch originally planned to accept a permanent position in the bipolar processing organization and sent an inter-office memo to accept. However, he received no reply.

Meanwhile, Motorola's MOS marketing leadership intervened. Frustrated that the MOS logic design group was struggling to deliver functioning silicon, marketing pressured management to reassign Mensch:

> “We haven't really gotten circuits to work out of that MOS logic group, so we want you to work there.”

A week after Mensch reported to the MOS logic group, the manager of the bipolar department called him demanding to know his whereabouts. When Mensch explained that his memo had gone unanswered, the manager revealed an extraordinary excuse:

> “Bill, did you see the TV you know last week or the week before when that tornado sit down in north Scottsdale? Well, maybe he said that was my house. I was putting my house back together, that's why I didn't respond to you.”

Reflecting on the freak event that set his microprocessor trajectory in motion, Mensch observed, “A tornado changed my path.”

[22:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=1339s) Building the Standard Cell Logic Libraries

Once situated in the MOS logic division, Mensch took on a foundational project that other senior engineers actively avoided: characterizing and designing logic gate libraries. Motorola operated a custom logic initiative out of Boston (which Mensch jokingly referred to as "loco logic") that allowed computer companies to develop semi-custom ICs utilizing a standard cell library.

The job demanded painstaking characterization of drive strengths, input/output capacitances, propagation delays, and silicon parameters for every gate. Mensch methodically generated performance data sheets and design parameters across six distinct semiconductor process technologies: - PMOS metal-gate - PMOS silicon-gate - CMOS metal-gate - CMOS silicon-gate - NMOS metal-gate - NMOS silicon-gate

Mastering this broad array of fabrication recipes gave Mensch an unusually comprehensive grasp of semiconductor physics and circuit design across the entire portfolio:

> “I designed the local logic library for PMOS metal gate, PMOS silicon gate, CMOS metal gate, CMOS silicon gate, NMOS metal gate, and NMOS silicon gate. So I learned all the processes, so it was kind of like, wow, this is—now I know how it all works.”

This accomplishment quickly led to his next assignment: designing Motorola’s Process Control Monitor (PCM) test structures.

[23:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=1424s) Process Control Monitors and Transition to the PIA

Bill Mensch begins by describing his early work at Motorola on the NMOS enhancement-load process used for manufacturing memory chips and microprocessors. His responsibility was designing the process control monitor (PCM), test structures stepped into approximately five locations across each wafer. Technicians probed these test sites to confirm whether a manufactured wafer met process specifications. Following this assignment, Mensch was invited to join Motorola’s microprocessor design group. While a team of engineers was already dedicated to the central processor itself, the project urgently needed a dedicated engineer to create the peripheral interface adapter (PIA). Mensch was promptly reassigned to design this critical support chip.

The PIA functioned as the bridge between the digital core—the microprocessor and memory—and the external physical world. It allowed the system to drive solenoids, read external switches, and manage peripheral inputs such as keyboard scanning, where specific output pins pulsed matrix rows while input pins sensed key presses. Mensch viewed the assignment as a pivotal milestone in his career, noting, “so i got a wonderful introduction to the whole system by doing that peripheral interface adapter.”

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: PIA System Architecture accDescr: Diagram showing the PIA connecting the 6800 microprocessor core to external real-world peripherals. subgraph Core ["Motorola Processing Core"] MPU["6800 Microprocessor"] MEM["Memory Elements"] end subgraph Interface ["MC6820 PIA"] PIA["Peripheral Interface Adapter"] end subgraph Peripherals ["External Real-World Devices"] SW["External Switches & Keyboards"] ACT["Solenoids & Actuators"] end MPU <-->|"Data & Control"| PIA MEM <-->|"Memory Bus"| PIA PIA <-->|"Handshake & Port A/B"| SW PIA -->|"Drive Signals"| ACT ```

---

[25:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=1508s) Defining the PIA: Specifications, Die Sizing, and Layout Innovation

Mensch reflects on Motorola’s product definition pipeline, which was heavily steered by applications and marketing teams rather than IC designers. Marketing gathered requests from prospective customers and dictated features, resulting in a somewhat disorganized architecture for the flagship 6800 CPU. As Mensch puts it: “the 6800 microprocessor was thrown together by a lot of contributors so therefore the design group didn't really have much to say about what went into it.” He explains that sales representatives would frequently request one-off instructions, making the 6800 a somewhat arbitrary design loosely inspired by Digital Equipment Corporation's PDP-8, in contrast to the later 6502, which adopted the cleaner architectural philosophy of the PDP-11.

For the PIA, sales and management mandated a strict die footprint of 135 mils by 135 mils so the part could be manufactured profitably. The manufacturing process utilized 0.4-mil metal line widths with 0.4-mil spacing (a 0.8-mil pitch). To fit the required logic onto the prescribed silicon area, Mensch organized the floorplan so the microprocessor data bus interfaced on one side, driving a central data path across the die directly out to the I/O pads. This compact topology proved so innovative that Motorola patent attorney Charlie Hoffman filed for and secured what Mensch describes as the industry's first integrated circuit layout patent. Addressing the constitutional purpose of intellectual property, Mensch remarks: “you get a monopoly if you're willing to teach someone.”

When the assigned mask designer hit a wall and declared that a critical section of the layout could not be interconnected within the required space, Mensch took matters into his own hands. Possessing a deeper understanding of transistor and diffusion resistor geometry, he stayed up all night after a party on a Friday to hand-complete the layout himself, delivering the finished design on Monday morning ready for verification.

- **Mandated die dimensions:** 135 mils × 135 mils (in contrast to the larger 6800 CPU at 217 mils × 210 mils). - **Process geometry:** 0.4 mil line width and 0.4 mil spacing (0.8 mil metal pitch centers). - **Patenting achievement:** Received a landmark patent for the functional layout and placement topology of the IC.

---

[29:55](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=1795s) Rubylith, Early Simulation Tools, and Transistor Modeling

Integrated circuit layout verification in the early 1970s was an entirely manual, physical discipline without modern automated layout versus schematic (LVS) software. Layouts digitized on early Calma (Calma I) drafting systems drove flatbed plotters fitted with cutting knives to slice large-format sheets of Rubylith. Drafting technicians then hand-peeled the red film layer to create clear apertures where light could pass during photographic reduction. Mensch’s insistence on verifying designs through computer simulation sprang from advice he had received after his father passed away, when an IBM supervisor named George Rogers spoke to him at Temple University: “his one comment that i don't remember anything else i don't remember a hello or goodbye or anything get into computers.”

Taking that advice to heart, Mensch turned to Motorola engineer Frank Jenkins, who had arrived from Stanford or UC Berkeley and authored an analog circuit simulation program called TIME (transient integrated microelectronics circuit analysis), renamed M-TIME at Motorola. Mensch bridged the lab and software worlds by running parametric tests on his process control monitors and supplying real-world empirical data to Jenkins to refine the simulation deck. During these experiments, Mensch discovered a significant narrow-channel effect: narrow-width transistors exhibited higher threshold voltages than wider devices. This discovery had gone unnoticed by Motorola’s memory design group, which had to redesign several circuits after Mensch documented the phenomenon.

- **CAD/Verification methods:** Calma I layout terminals driving flatbed knife cutters on peelable Rubylith; complete absence of automated LVS checks. - **Circuit simulation tool:** M-TIME (Motorola TIME), an empirical transient circuit analysis engine developed by Frank Jenkins with fewer than 10 core device parameters. - **Device physics discovery:** Narrow MOS transistors exhibited unexpectedly higher threshold voltages, forcing revisions across Motorola's memory line.

---

[33:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=1993s) Chip Architecture, Bit-Programmable I/O, and Market Success

The final PIA design comprised roughly 1,000 to 1,500 transistors—a design so enduring that Mensch notes The Western Design Center still sells drop-in compatible replacements decades later. The chip featured 20 total I/O lines organized into two 8-bit bidirectional peripheral ports (16 lines) plus two dedicated hardware handshake lines per port (4 lines). Crucially, Mensch implemented a Data Direction Register (DDR) alongside the peripheral data register, permitting users to configure every single I/O pin independently as either an input or an output.

Competing peripheral parts of the era, notably from Intel’s 8080 family, forced entire 8-bit ports to be locked purely as all-input or all-output. The granular, bit-by-bit directionality of Mensch’s PIA made it vastly more flexible for real-world embedded control, leading customers to adopt it even when building around Intel processors. Mensch shares a humorous market dynamic involving NCR: “motorola would force them to buy a 6800 they were buying intel processors but buying my pa pias so intel marketing thought hey for every 10 pias you got to buy one microprocessor.” NCR purchased the mandatory 6800 CPUs just to get access to Mensch’s PIAs, often looking for places to offload the unwanted processors while pairing the Motorola PIA directly with the Intel 8080.

- **Gate complexity:** 1,000 to 1,500 MOS transistors. - **Port layout:** Two 8-bit bidirectional ports (16 data pins) alongside 4 dedicated handshaking control pins (2 per port). - **Key architectural differentiator:** Bit-level programmable Data Direction Registers (DDR), offering flexible mixed-pin configurations not available on Intel's peripheral chips.

[35:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=2111s) Architecture and Pinout of the Peripheral Interface Adapter (PIA)

Wrapping up the architectural overview of the Peripheral Interface Adapter (the Motorola 6820 PIA), Bill Mensch describes how the device coordinated data exchange with outside hardware. The peripheral interface side relied on a strict handshaking protocol: when an external peripheral grabbed the data present on the pins, it acknowledged the transaction by signaling back that the pins had been read. This mechanism supported both interrupt-driven and polled operation, allowing the host system to monitor exactly when data transfers concluded.

On the other side of the chip lay the interface to the microprocessor bus. This side featured eight bidirectional data pins, register addressing lines to select internal control and data registers, a read/write control line, a phase-two clock input, and connections for the power supply. Mensch notes that this entire complement of input, output, bus, and control lines was packaged into a standard dual-inline 40-pin package. As Bill Mensch sums it up regarding the complete interface: “that's basically a pia the other side of it is the interface to the microprocessor.”

- **Bus Interface:** 8 data pins, register addressing, read/write line, phase-two ($\Phi_2$) clock, power, and ground. - **Peripheral Interface:** Handshake control lines supporting polled and interrupt-driven transfers. - **Packaging:** Standard 40-pin DIP.

---

[35:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=2144s) Buffer Design, Clock Generators, and Circuit Physics at Motorola

Beyond the PIA, Mensch's circuit innovations were integrated across Motorola’s entire microprocessor chip family. Leveraging his earlier work developing standard cell libraries, he created the foundational input/output buffers and clock generators used by all the chips in the lineup. While others treated digital logic strictly as abstract gates, Mensch approached the silicon with an analog engineer's grounding in device physics. He calculated the exact capacitive and resistive loading along data paths and interconnect wiring, modeling those parasitics during simulation so transistors could be sized appropriately to achieve reliable switching speeds. As Bill Mensch points out: “and if you don't know what the capacitive loading is you don't know what transistor sizes will be required to switch in a certain time frame.”

That deep grasp of transistor-level physics remained a cornerstone of his later career. After founding Western Design Center, Mensch kept his fledgling business afloat by consulting for Xerox, where he taught their engineering staff how to design microprocessors from the ground up. Xerox's engineers struggled because they lacked this physical perspective on circuit assembly. Mensch demonstrated how transistor dimensions must directly account for wire and junction capacitance to meet target clock rates, bridging the divide between high-level logic and solid-state reality.

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: Transistor Sizing Workflow accDescr: Bill Mensch's methodology for sizing MOS transistors based on physical line parasitics. subgraph Analysis["Parasitic Analysis"] A["Interconnect / Data Path"] --> B["Calculate Capacitive & Resistive Load"] end subgraph Implementation["Circuit Synthesis"] B --> C["Model Load in Simulation"] C --> D["Size MOS Transistors for Target Delay"] end ```

---

[37:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=2238s) Chuck Peddle's Proposal to Leave Motorola for a New Microprocessor

While Mensch was in the middle of designing his next Motorola assignment—a programmable timer module (PTM)—Motorola began preparations to relocate its semiconductor operations from Phoenix, Arizona, to Austin, Texas. At that juncture, systems architect Chuck Peddle approached Mensch with an alternative. Peddle asked him bluntly if he really wanted to pack up his life and move out to Texas, and Mensch admitted he had no desire to go.

Peddle seized the opening to pitch an audacious venture: rather than moving to Austin to support a flagship processor they already viewed as flawed, they should assemble a core group of Motorola talent, find an independent company willing to sponsor them, and create an entirely new processor. Both engineers recognized that the Motorola 6800 was far too large and expensive to unlock high-volume cost-sensitive markets. Describing Peddle's pitch to break away, Bill Mensch recalls: “so chuck says hey how about if we we get a group together and we design the microprocessor we really want to do and you know that the 6800 isn't the right one it's too big.” Peddle took on the responsibility of scouting a landing spot while asking Mensch which essential engineers they needed to recruit out of Motorola to ensure the new design succeeded.

---

[38:17](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=2297s) Broken Promises: The First-Pass Bet and Engineering Bonus

Mensch’s departure was accelerated by two broken promises that left him thoroughly disillusioned with Motorola management. During a celebratory dinner at a local restaurant after the tape-out and release of the 6800 microprocessor and the 6820 PIA to manufacturing, Mensch got into an exchange over wine with MOS operations manager Otis Wolkins. Confident in his design discipline, Mensch offered a bold wager: he bet that his PIA would work completely on the very first silicon pass. Wolkins scoffed, stating that no complex integrated circuit had ever functioned on the first run. The two men agreed to a wager consisting of a high-end dinner for both engineers and their wives. When Mensch proposed the wharf in San Francisco, Wolkins countered with a luxury restaurant in Scottsdale featuring a $100 bottle of wine. Because automated Layout Versus Schematic (LVS) design verification software did not exist at the time, Mensch had personally checked the entire chip layout by hand five consecutive times. As Bill Mensch puts it: “you make a bet you better back it up.”

When the prototype silicon arrived from the fab, the PIA functioned on the first pass, but Wolkins reneged on the bet and never bought the dinner. Around the same time, Motorola was negotiating a second-source agreement with American Microsystems, Inc. (AMI). In a joint meeting, AMI management declared that if Mensch's PIA worked on the first pass, they would award him the project's first engineering bonus. That pledge sparked immediate friction with 6800 project leader John Buchanan, who felt that holding the overall engineering team together entitled him to the bonus instead. When the silicon worked and AMI never paid the promised bonus, Mensch realized his contributions were not being honored. Walking down the hallway at the 52nd Street facility, he ran into Jerry Foster, who asked if the rumors were true that he was quitting. Mensch confirmed his departure without hesitation, resolved to make his next venture a success. Reflecting on his mindset at that turning point, Bill Mensch explains: “no it was it was the fact that i needed to leave because not one but two promises were broken.”

- **The Dinner Bet:** A dinner including wives and a $100 bottle of wine in Scottsdale bet by Otis Wolkins against first-pass silicon success; Wolkins never paid. - **The AMI Bonus:** An engineering performance bonus promised by second-source partner AMI that was never delivered. - **Verification Method:** Manual five-fold visual and schematic check of the mask artwork in lieu of automated LVS verification tools.

---

[41:17](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=2477s) The Culture Clash at MOS Technology

Mensch, Peddle, and their cohort moved east to join MOS Technology in Norristown, Pennsylvania, entering an organization with a radically different corporate heritage. MOS Technology was staffed by former Texas Instruments personnel who ran a thriving business manufacturing p-channel MOS (PMOS) metal-gate chips for consumer calculators. The operations was spearheaded by a seasoned former TI manufacturing executive, while co-founder Don McLaughlin served as Vice President of Engineering, overseeing a logic team that designed sophisticated scientific and four-function calculator circuits.

When the Motorola expatriates walked through the door, the incumbent engineering staff was openly hostile to them. The calculator designers questioned why MOS Technology co-founder and president John Paivinen had recruited an outside team from the West Coast to build a microprocessor when they believed their internal team was fully capable of doing it themselves. Describing the resentment among the local staff, Bill Mensch remarks: “they're saying what how could john paven and the founding president how could he hire this group out of the west they don't know what they're doing and we know what we can do why why aren't we doing it.” Despite this cold reception, the new microprocessor project received the designation 6500—chosen informally because 65 was a lower number than Motorola’s 68—with the pin-compatible 6501 designated as their first production part, followed shortly by the iconic 6502.

---

[43:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=2604s) Assembling the Ex-Motorola Design Team

The defection from Motorola to MOS Technology involved a tightly organized team of eight people, supplemented by an additional local hire in Pennsylvania. Chuck Peddle served as the business mastermind and marketing visionary, negotiating the employment and product agreement with John Paivinen and defining the market opportunity. As Bill Mensch describes Peddle's central role: “he was the ring leader he was the he was the business guy he was the guy that said if we do this we can we can create a good business opportunity.” Terry Holt joined to oversee operations, while Bill Mensch and Rod Orgill headed up processor circuit design and architecture.

To translate the schematic architecture into silicon geometry, the team brought two experienced layout designers from Motorola, Harry Bawcom and Mike Janes, and hired a third layout specialist, Syd Hawkins, once they arrived in Pennsylvania. This eight-to-nine-person design and layout cell was featured in an *Electronic Engineering Times* (EE Times) photograph documenting the team responsible for creating the 6500 family. Operating under Peddle's commercial plan, this tight-knit group operated independently inside MOS Technology to bring the processor to market.

- **Business & Marketing Lead:** Chuck Peddle - **Processor Circuit & Logic Design:** Bill Mensch, Rod Orgill - **Operations Management:** Terry Holt - **Mask Layout Designers:** Harry Bawcom, Mike Janes, Syd Hawkins (hired locally)

---

[44:35](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=2675s) Bringing Up Depletion-Load NMOS and Dramatic Yield Improvements

MOS Technology did not possess an n-channel MOS (NMOS) manufacturing line when the Motorola team arrived, requiring them to build a new fabrication process from scratch. Mensch had previously advocated for an NMOS depletion-load process at Motorola, only to face stubborn bureaucratic resistance. During his time running Motorola’s Process Control Monitor (PCM) test vehicles, Mensch had leveraged crystal lattice physics—orienting structures to match silicon carrier mobility—and built depletion-load and enhancement-load test devices side-by-side on the same wafer. Producing depletion devices required just one extra ion-implantation mask step, yet it yielded faster switching speeds, reduced overall transistor count, and consumed less silicon area. When establishing the new MOS Technology line, Mensch and Peddle bypassed Motorola's reluctance and specified an NMOS depletion-load process using a streamlined flow of only seven to eight mask levels on roughly 3-inch wafers. As Bill Mensch recalls regarding Motorola's resistance to technical progress: “which going back to motorola days which was another reason why i left motorola is when you want to make a difference and somebody stands in your way for no apparent reason you kind of say what's going on here.”

The manufacturing results at MOS Technology completely outperformed Motorola's fab. At Motorola, NMOS process head Ed Armstrong had struggled with dismal wafer yields for months. In contrast, MOS Technology leveraged proximity printing rather than contact mask aligners (which degraded mask plates through physical contact) and utilized a proprietary mask-defect repair technique known as "spot knocking." By eliminating pinholes and particulate flaws on their photolithography plates, MOS Technology produced nearly defect-free masks. Consequently, while Motorola had celebrated single-digit yields, MOS Technology achieved an order-of-magnitude yield advantage on the 6502. Highlighting the stark contrast between the two operations, Bill Mensch observes: “he grew a long beard waiting for 10 good die per wafer and we were getting like 100 good die per wafer on the 6502 we had at least 10 times the yield per wafer.”

| Parameter | Motorola NMOS (6800 era) | MOS Technology NMOS (6502 era) | |:--- |:--- |:--- | | **Load Device Type** | Enhancement load | Depletion load (ion-implanted) | | **Mask Count** | Higher complexity | 7 to 8 masks | | **Lithography Masking** | Contact printing (mask wear) | Proximity printing / projection | | **Defect Mitigation** | Standard inspection | Proprietary "spot knocking" mask repair | | **Functional Yield** | Struggled to reach ~10 good dies/wafer | ~100 good dies/wafer (~10× yield improvement) |

[47:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=2825s) Mask Retouching and the On-Chip Clock Generator

Bill Mensch explains the significant manufacturing advantages MOS Technology held over Motorola. By employing a process called "spot knocking," they could compare two photomasks; since defects or pinholes would rarely occur in the exact same spot on both masks, technicians could manually apply a tiny bit of ink to cover holes and produce a near-perfect mask that could run hundreds of wafers without degradation. Because Motorola was not performing this kind of mask retouching, MOS Technology achieved drastically higher yields. This allowed them to sell the 6501 for $20 and the 6502 for $25 while still turning a healthy profit.

When the Motorola defector team arrived at MOS Technology to build a microprocessor, Chuck Peddle drove the high-level architecture while Mensch operated as the semiconductor engineer tasked with executing Peddle's vision. However, Mensch intervened when he recognized critical design bottlenecks in Motorola's competing 6800. Motorola charged $375 for the 6800 microprocessor and another $69 for an external clock generator—bringing the total system cost past $400 before adding any I/O chips. Worse still, producing the clock chip and the microprocessor on separate silicon wafers meant that process variations between wafers could pair a slow clock with a fast processor, triggering fatal race conditions.

While Peddle was away on a marketing trip, Mensch pitched Rod Orgill on integrating the clock generator directly onto the microprocessor die. By designing it in, an engineer would only need to attach a simple crystal and resistor (or an RC network) rather than an expensive external IC. When Peddle returned, Mensch assured him the on-chip clock was merely a metal-mask option that cost nothing in silicon real estate: the 6501 and 6502 shared the exact same base silicon, with the 6502 simply connecting the integrated clock generator at the metal layer.

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: Evolution from 6501 to 6502 Silicon accDescr: Diagram shows how shared base silicon with differing metal layers created the 6501 and 6502, leading to the settlement with Motorola. subgraph Die["Shared Silicon Die"] Base["Base Processor Layout"] Clock["Integrated Clock Generator"] end

Base -->|"Metal Option A<br/>(External Clock)"| M6501["MOS 6501<br/>• 6800 Pinout<br/>• $20 price"] Base & Clock -->|"Metal Option B<br/>(Internal Clock)"| M6502["MOS 6502<br/>• Unique Pinout<br/>• $25 price"]

M6501 -->|"Motorola Lawsuit<br/>Dropped in Settlement"| DeadEnd["Discontinued"] M6502 -->|"Surviving Product"| MassMarket["Market Standard"] ```

[50:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=3001s) The Bet with Rod Orgill and the Motorola Lawsuit

Because the 6501 preserved the pinout of the Motorola 6800, Orgill believed customers would prefer drop-in compatibility and predicted it would far outsell the 6502. Mensch disagreed, arguing that the convenience of an onboard clock generator made for a superior engineering solution. The two made a friendly wager while waiting for the first silicon to return from fabrication: > “I'm saying I think technology wins over marketing. Rod says marketing wins over technology.”

When Motorola filed a sweeping lawsuit against MOS Technology, the subsequent settlement forced MOS Technology to withdraw the pin-compatible 6501 entirely. With the 6501 removed from the market, the 6502 became the sole surviving product, and Mensch won his bet by default.

Mensch had never anticipated a lawsuit because he considered their design fundamentally different: MOS Technology used a brand-new depletion-load NMOS process rather than Motorola's enhancement-load process with complex bootstrap circuits, and the instruction set was completely original, meaning no 6800 opcodes could execute on their chips. In discovery, Motorola pursued patent infringement and trade-secret theft. The patent claim had technical merit regarding the 6520 peripheral interface adapter, which Mensch notes was identical to Motorola's 6820: > “Well, yeah, a 6520 chip is exactly the same as a 6820 chip; yeah, we violated your patent.”

The trade-secret allegations escalated when depositions revealed that one of the mask designers had brought Motorola schematics along during the move. Mensch insists these schematics were useless because the depletion-load process required entirely different circuit topologies, but the revelation nevertheless created severe legal friction. Ultimately, the trade-secret claims were dropped, and the dispute was resolved under a settlement centered on patent licensing and the discontinuation of the 6501.

[53:20](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=3200s) Decimal Arithmetic, the Atari Asteroids Bug, and Commodore's Takeover

The core patent granted for the 6502 covered its decimal correction hardware. Unlike the Motorola 6800, the 6502 allowed a programmer to set a single bit in the status register (the P register) to toggle between standard binary arithmetic and Binary Coded Decimal (BCD) math. Mensch wrote a complete Fortran simulation to verify every logic combination of the decimal-correct circuitry. All four key team members—Chuck Peddle, Bill Mensch, Rod Orgill, and Will Mathis—were named as co-inventors on the patent.

This BCD feature had tangible repercussions years later. Atari implemented it inside the coin-op arcade hit *Asteroids* to tally scores during the CRT display's vertical blanking interval. When Mensch subsequently designed the CMOS version of the 6502 (the 65C02), he had to implement decimal correction without infringing on his original patent, which added one clock cycle to the operation. That single extra cycle threw off Atari's video-synchronized timing loops and caused the asteroid graphics to tear apart on screen.

Despite the technical triumphs of the 6502, MOS Technology struggled financially. Because the microprocessor industry was still in its infancy, volume was low, and second sources like Synertek and Rockwell captured large contracts in California. Seeing an opening, Commodore founder Jack Tramiel capitalized on MOS Technology's vulnerability: > “MOS was going out of business; that's what Jack Tramiel saw—he saw blood in the water.”

Tramiel placed an enormous order for calculator chips representing six months to a year of MOS Technology's capacity. After the company expanded its headcount to roughly 200 workers to fulfill it, Tramiel abruptly canceled further chip orders. Deprived of calculator revenue before microprocessor sales could ramp up to Peddle's optimistic forecasts, MOS Technology was left defenseless, clearing the path for Tramiel to acquire the company outright. Mensch departed MOS Technology around March 1977.

[56:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=3409s) WESCON 1975: The Famous Mason Jar Debut

The team had officially transferred from Motorola to MOS Technology's payroll on August 19, 1974. Exactly one year later, by late summer 1975, they had brought up an entire semiconductor process, taped out the design, and prepared for commercial release. In September 1975, they unveiled the 6501 and 6502 in San Francisco during WESCON. Because show organizers barred them from selling silicon directly on the convention floor, Peddle set up shop in a room at the nearby St. Francis Hotel.

Peddle filled a large glass mason jar to the brim with working microprocessors, selling them to hobbyists and engineers for $20 and $25, while Mensch and Orgill mingled and drank beer with prospective buyers. The interviewer recalls attending the event as an enthusiast who could only afford the printed manuals rather than the processor itself. Meanwhile, back at the exhibition floor booth, crowds clamoring for data sheets overwhelmed the aisle: > “You could look down from the second floor and look down—here are all these people around our little booth knocking over a pinball—not a pinball, what do you call it, a pachinko machine or something like that with little balls—and our neighbors were not happy with us because they were getting trampled trying to get a data sheet.”

Attendees included Steve Wozniak, who purchased chips that would power the Apple I. When asked whether industry observers were skeptical that MOS Technology could deliver chips at under one-tenth the cost of the Motorola 6800, Mensch notes that as a bench designer he was insulated from market chatter. Chuck Peddle handled customer skepticism directly, occasionally courting doubt because of his tendency to massage details to fit his pitch.

- **August 19, 1974**: Team dropped from Motorola payroll and picked up by MOS Technology. - **August/September 1975**: 6501 ($20) and 6502 ($25) released; officially demonstrated at WESCON / St. Francis Hotel. - **March 1977**: Bill Mensch leaves MOS Technology following the Commodore acquisition.

[59:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=3586s) Demonstrating Competence and Designing the VIA Without a Computer

Mensch emphasizes that MOS Technology possessed deep semiconductor expertise that allowed them to dramatically undercut competitors' prices while still remaining profitable. Their manufacturing process yielded ten times as much on the same wafer sizes, and they were already accustomed to building larger chips for the calculator market at lower costs than their rivals. The operations were run by seasoned veterans from Texas Instruments, meaning the team had proven, high-level industry talent. Mensch was confident in showing schematics to anyone who doubted them: “We know what we're doing.” While Chuck Peddle handled marketing meetings, Mensch stayed immersed in hardware design.

During this period, Mensch designed the 6522 VIA (Versatile Interface Adapter) entirely by hand, without any computer-aided simulation tools. By that point in his career, he had mastered transistor sizing by intuition and experience. Proving to himself that he could produce a fully functional, complex chip without needing an expensive mainframe simulator was a pivotal milestone that gave him the confidence to know he could eventually launch his own independent company.

[01:00:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=3658s) Designing the VIA on an Arby's Napkin and the Macintosh Mouse Port

The functional definition of the 6522 VIA was born during a lunch meeting between Mensch, Chuck Peddle, and application engineer Will Mathis at an Arby's restaurant in Norristown, Pennsylvania. Peddle had returned from discussions noting that customers urgently needed an onboard timer and a serial port integrated with peripheral I/O. Sketching out the architecture on a paper napkin, Mensch calculated the register constraints: combining a PIA, a timer, and a serial port expanded the register count, requiring it to be constrained to 16 addressable registers.

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: Evolution of 6522 VIA Feature Set accDescr: Diagram tracing the napkin requirements through two layout revisions to its eventual deployment in the original Macintosh.

subgraph Ideation ["Arby's Lunch Meeting"] A["6820/6520 PIA Core"] --> D["6522 VIA Concept"] B["Hardware Timer"] --> D C["Serial Port"] --> D end

subgraph Silicon ["Design & Iteration"] D --> E["16 Addressable Registers"] E --> F["First Pinout Layout"] F --> G["Redesign for Compatibility"] end

subgraph Legacy ["Field Application"] G --> H["Synchronous 8-bit Port"] H --> I["Apple Macintosh Mouse Interface"] end ```

After completing the initial silicon layout, Peddle requested changes for system compatibility, forcing Mensch to redesign the entire chip a second time with a different pinout. When Mensch originally asked Peddle what type of serial port was required, Peddle simply responded, “just any serial port.” Consequently, Mensch implemented an unusual 8-bit synchronous shift register rather than a full asynchronous UART. Though unconventional, this unique serial port found notable real-world use, including serving as the mouse interface on the original Apple Macintosh. Looking back, Mensch reflects: “If I had to do all over again, I said, 'Chuck, we need a UART plus a timer plus the I/O pins, and we got a really good product.'”

- **Register Budget**: Kept to exactly 16 registers to fit system addressing schemes. - **Port Architecture**: 8 bits in, 8 bits out, operating synchronously rather than asynchronously. - **Apple Adoption**: Utilized in the original Macintosh hardware to interface with the mouse.

[01:02:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=3768s) Division of Labor, System Software, and Commodore Video Chips

Mensch maintained strict boundaries between his responsibilities and those of his colleagues. Chuck Peddle oversaw marketing and authored the software manual, while Will Mathis handled customer applications and wrote the hardware manual, leaving Mensch free to focus entirely on silicon design. While Mensch assisted with manufacturing logistics for early gaming chips—such as Atari's *Pong* silicon fabricated at MOS Technology—he stayed out of broader board-level architectural debates.

When Commodore later developed the PET, VIC-20, and Commodore 64, internal philosophies diverged. Peddle championed the Commodore PET as a serious, professional machine equipped with an IEEE-488 bus, which Mensch describes: “He was PET—that's industrial-strength stuff... this is real engineering, this is a real computer.” However, the PET suffered commercially from Jack Tramiel's decision to include a cheap chiclet keyboard. In contrast, the consumer-oriented VIC-20 and Commodore 64 moved toward entertainment, driven by design engineers like Al Charpentier, who created custom sprite hardware for video games.

[01:05:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=3913s) Driving Composite Video and the 6502’s Competitive Advantage

To demonstrate the capability of his design, Mensch pulled off an engineering feat that Peddle believed was impossible: in just two weeks, he harnessed the VIA's serial port to directly generate a composite video signal on a standard television set, creating a playable barnstorming flight game. Tramiel had told him it could not be done, but Mensch determined the precise timing by clocking the processor at 4 MHz.

At that speed, the 6502 was running two to four times faster than competing chips from Intel or Motorola. Mensch attributes this performance to the depletion-load NMOS process, which delivered superior clock rates at lower power consumption. Combined with aggressive pricing and an intuitive instruction set, the 6502 held an unbeatable market position. Mensch summarizes the total architectural edge: “So we were easier to use, lower power, lower cost, and twice as fast—you got a winner. Any one of those things, you got a winner. All four of them: slam dunk.”

| Feature Metric | MOS Technology 6502 | Contemporary Rivals (Intel / Motorola) | |:--- |:--- |:--- | | **Clock Speed** | Up to 4 MHz (2× to 4× faster) | Typically 1 MHz to 2 MHz | | **Unit Price** | ~$20-$25 (roughly 1/10th cost) | ~$179-$300 | | **Power Consumption** | Significantly lower | Higher power draw | | **Process Tech** | Depletion-load NMOS | Standard enhancement-load NMOS | | **Ease of Use** | Streamlined instruction set & pipelining | Complex register architectures |

[01:06:31](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=3991s) Market Adoption Realities and Clock Oscillator Expertise

Despite the 6502’s technical superiority, Mensch understood that raw architecture alone does not decide industry standards. Major firms like DEC initially favored established giants like Motorola or Intel because of corporate marketing muscle, reliable supply guarantees, and business relationships, which MOS Technology struggled to navigate. Mensch remarks on these commercial dynamics: “It's not about whether the architecture is better, it's: do you know what you're doing in manufacturing? Will you support your customers' need?”

Addressing technical questions about the 6502's integrated on-chip clock generator, Mensch notes that it worked on the very first silicon pass without requiring revisions, thanks to his analog background as Motorola’s former clock specialist. His reputation as an oscillator expert was so established that while consulting at ICE (Integrated Circuit Engineering), he was brought in to redesign an unreliable 10 kHz Statek crystal oscillator for an implantable cardiac pacemaker. He successfully re-engineered the circuit to run with a 32 kHz crystal. The design was put straight into production to remedy pacemaker recalls; the customer simply called him on a Saturday morning to confirm it worked perfectly, and Mensch never even laid eyes on the physical chip. Decades later, his collaborator David Gray helped refine those oscillator designs even further for Western Design Center’s W65C134 and W65C265 microcontrollers.

[01:09:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=4185s) Motivation to Depart MOS and the Ricoh Super Nintendo Contract

Mensch’s drive to build standard microprocessors for industrial, commercial, and gaming applications eventually spurred him to strike out on his own. He avoided building finished consumer gadgets like calculators himself, preferring to provide core silicon engines for the broader electronics industry.

That trajectory culminated in a landmark deal with Japanese semiconductor manufacturer Ricoh. Mensch granted Ricoh an exclusive manufacturing license to supply 65816-based 16-bit processor cores to Nintendo for the Super Famicom (Super Nintendo Entertainment System). Mensch recalls with amusement how his son became an immediate celebrity in their neighborhood when he received an early Japanese Super Famicom directly from Ricoh, completely equipped with Japanese text and characters before the console had even launched in the United States.

- **Nintendo Processor Core**: The 16-bit W65C816S architecture, licensed through Ricoh. - **Contractual Scope**: The only exclusive licensing agreement Mensch ever granted to a partner company.

[01:10:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=4251s) Leaving MOS Technology and Rejecting Xerox

As the business climate deteriorated around 1977, MOS Technology was in dire financial straits and looked like it was going to go out of business. During this period, Chuck Peddle shifted away from being the microprocessor team leader toward becoming a systems-level person, aligning himself with California operations as Commodore was acquiring MOS Technology in what Bill Mensch describes as a depressed situation or fire sale. Mensch decided to leave during or shortly after the Commodore acquisition around the time the Apple II was being introduced. He had no desire to cater to low-end consumer toys, explaining his engineering philosophy: “I only want to design something that goes into high-volume production used by many and so looking at feeding the game or calculator consumer products that wasn't my cup of tea that's not what I wanted to do.”

Exploring his career options while still employed at MOS Technology, Mensch flew to El Segundo, California, to interview at Xerox with Bob Markle (or a similar name). Xerox was eager to hire him and offered to double his salary because experienced microprocessor designers were exceedingly scarce. However, when Mensch inquired about the actual job responsibilities, he learned he would be in a pure research laboratory where designs were handed off to production teams who would completely redesign them for manufacturing. Mensch balked at the wastefulness of that model, telling his interviewer, “Bob, I'm in the wrong place. My designs don't get redesigned, they go into volume production right away, or why didn't I do it right in the first place?” He made it clear he was not a research academic: “I'm not a research guy, I'm somebody that wants to make things happen, and how I know I'm making them happen because they go into volume production, they're used by people, we don't throw away designs, we just do it the right the first time.” Politely declining the doubled salary, he returned to Pennsylvania to figure out his next move.

[01:14:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=4444s) Integrated Circuit Engineering (ICE) and the Seminar Circuit

Mensch found his next opportunity with Glen Madland at ICE (Integrated Circuit Engineering) in Arizona. Madland had been the first design manager at Motorola in Phoenix and had recognized early on that the industry needed someone to teach the market how to use integrated circuits, which operated on completely different principles than discrete resistors and transistors. Seeing the value of having a proven microprocessor designer on staff to educate industry leaders, Madland hired Mensch to teach global seminars, including a dedicated course titled "Microprocessors for Management." Mensch accepted the job at a lateral salary—receiving no raise—because returning to Arizona felt right for his family, which now included two children under four years old.

The transition from hands-on circuit design to public lecturing proved intensely jarring. Addressing rooms of 50 paying executives and engineers, Mensch developed severe, incapacitating migraine headaches within the first hour of sessions, yet had to push through without any backup speaker. He struggled with audience reception: while peers like Howard received stellar reviews, Mensch initially received failing marks from attendees. When he vented his frustration to Madland, his boss offered a startling reality check: “Bill, you haven't figured it out yet, we're in the entertainment business.” Madland explained that attendees traveled from freezing climates to warm Arizona expecting an enjoyable experience, whereas Mensch was overwhelming them with dense technical detail they could not digest. Reluctantly, Mensch dumbed down his technical material, and while his evaluation scores immediately rose, the compromise felt hollow and unfulfilling: “This doesn't feel right at all, so I can't do this.”

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: The Glen Madland Dilemma at ICE accDescr: Flowchart illustrating Bill Mensch's dilemma while teaching at Integrated Circuit Engineering (ICE). subgraph ICE["ICE Seminars: High-Density vs Entertainment"] A["Deep Technical Detail"] --> B["Attendees Overwhelmed & Headache"] B --> C["Failing Student Evaluations"] D["Dumbed-Down Material"] --> E["Entertained Audience"] E --> F["High Grades (Felt Inauthentic to Mensch)"] end subgraph Epiphany["Glen Madland's Life Formula"] G["Doing what you want to do"] H["Living where you want to live"] I["Being comfortable financially"] end C -.-> G F -.-> G ```

[01:18:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=4704s) The "What's It All About?" Epiphany and Reverse Engineering

Standing at the coffee bar outside their adjoining offices, Mensch asked Madland a foundational question: “What's it all about?” Madland gave an answer that stayed with Mensch forever: “For me, it's about doing what you want to do, living where you want to live, and you're comfortable.” Returning to his desk, Mensch took inventory of his own life: he loved living in Arizona, but his second child had just been born on a credit card because ICE lacked maternity benefits, leaving him deeply uncomfortable financially. Crucially, he was not doing what he wanted to do. Comparing himself to baseball pitcher Denny McLain, who had an unprecedented 30-win season, Mensch felt as though he had just pitched a world-class no-hitter with the 6502 only to find himself sitting on the sidelines of his own industry: “I just pitched a no-hitter, wins 30 games, and I'm out of the business; I need to get back in the business.”

While at ICE, Mensch worked on extensive reverse-engineering projects for commercial clients, charging a fixed fee of $5,000 per processor. To handle the workload, he organized a mini assembly line, employing a bipolar consultant to assist with bipolar components while he traced the internal registers, logic, and transistors. Notable highlights of this period include: - Reverse-engineering competing dynamic RAM chips for Shell Oil Company, which owned early DRAM patents and was pursuing Mostek. Mensch examined the Mostek circuits designed by Bob Proebsting (a former Shell designer) and demonstrated the use of balanced bit-line architectures and sense amplifiers. - Training engineers at NCR on microprocessor design, working around their proprietary bipolar technologies such as integrated injection logic ($I^2L$) or emitter-coupled logic (ECL)—a task he completed faithfully despite believing bipolar was the wrong direction for microprocessors. - Receiving an overture about a year into his time at ICE from Commodore's Jack Tramiel, who sought low-power CMOS calculator chips. Tramiel was utilizing a Southern California semiconductor firm (believed to be Frontier Semiconductor) for CMOS manufacturing. This demand directly paved the way for Mensch to step away from consulting and establish the Western Design Center (WDC).

[01:22:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=4952s) Setting Up ICE Simulation and the Risk Dispute with Glenn

Bill Mensch wanted to establish a full integrated circuit design capability at Integrated Circuit Engineering (ICE). To achieve this, he needed both circuit and logic simulation tools. He tracked down a circuit simulator and a logic simulator originating from Bowmar (the calculator firm, where ICE had earlier ties). Frank Jenkins, an engineer Mensch knew from their days at Motorola, had developed both tools. Jenkins had left Motorola and was actively selling these simulators prior to the advent of tools like Verilog. Mensch got the software running on an accounting firm's Prime 300 minicomputer, which utilized virtual memory and could handle virtually any size logic circuit.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: The Roadblock to In-House IC Design at ICE accDescr: Diagram showing how Mensch set up simulation tools at ICE, only to be blocked by Glenn's risk aversion and mutual mistrust between Glenn and Jack Tramiel.

subgraph Infrastructure["ICE Tool Infrastructure"] A["Frank Jenkins<br/>(ex-Motorola)"] -->|"Simulators"| B["Prime 300<br/>Virtual Memory Minicomputer"] B --> C["Mensch establishes IC design base"] end

subgraph Stalemate["The Commercial Impasse"] C --> D{"Glenn's Stance"} D -->|"Rejects IC design"| E["'Chips don't always work'<br/>Too much risk to goodwill"] F["Chuck Peddle calls:<br/>Tramiel wants calculator chips"] --> G{"Negotiation Attempt"} G -->|"Glenn"| H["'Jack ripped me off,<br/>never working with him'"] G -->|"Tramiel"| I["'Glenn ripped me off,<br/>won't deal with ICE'"] end

E --> J["Mensch leaves to start own company"] H --> J I --> J ```

Mensch planned to market logic and circuit simulation services through ICE while building an in-house design foundation. However, Glenn Madland pushed back against actual chip design due to commercial liability:

> “Glenn says, ‘You know, there's a problem with designing integrated circuits: they don't always work.’”

Mensch countered that chips do work if you know what you are doing, but Glenn remained unyielding:

> “‘Yeah, but there's a risk involved there, and you can risk our good, good will—our relationship we have, so I can't really take that risk.’”

As Mensch wondered how he would continue designing chips, Chuck Peddle unexpectedly reached out with an opportunity: Jack Tramiel needed calculator chips designed for Commodore. When Mensch pitched the opportunity to Glenn, Glenn flatly rejected it:

> “Glenn says, ‘No, Jack ripped me off, Jack owes me money, it's not good, I never want to do anything with Jack ever again.’”

Mensch then asked Chuck if Commodore would hire ICE to do the design work with the simulators and tools he had configured, but Peddle delivered the exact mirror image of the complaint:

> “‘Nope, Jack doesn't want to have anything to do with Glenn.’”

Astonished that each man accused the other of ripping him off, Mensch realized he could not pursue chip design inside ICE and resolved to establish his own independent company.

---

[01:25:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=5134s) The Las Vegas Casino Meeting and Deal Structure

On Mother's Day weekend in May 1978 (around May 13), Mensch traveled to Las Vegas to meet Jack Tramiel and Chuck Peddle at a casino. When Mensch arrived, Tramiel was down $10,000 at the tables, but his fortunes abruptly reversed and he won $17,000. Crediting Mensch with bringing him good luck, Tramiel invited them up to his hotel suite to talk business. Tramiel sat opposite, Chuck sat alongside, and Mensch sat on the sofa. Tramiel opened by asking Mensch what he wanted to do, and when Mensch stated he wanted to design ICs for Commodore, Tramiel immediately made an aggressive executive pitch:

> “‘I'll give you a department within Commodore, I'll make you vice president of Commodore—a whole division. I'll pay you more than I pay Chuck.’”

This sudden offer left Chuck Peddle visibly unsettled. Mensch declined the corporate role, telling Tramiel he insisted on having his own independent firm. Leveraging his experience drafting client agreements at ICE, Mensch proposed a milestone-driven contract where Commodore would cover his direct costs so he would break even, with all profits tied to unit royalties:

> “‘I get a royalty off of each chip, so I don't make anything if it doesn't go into volume production. I believe in what I do. I believe what I do will be—produce volumes; that's where I'll make the profit, I'll break even, and that's how it works.’”

- Tramiel offered a full division, a vice presidency, and higher pay than Chuck Peddle to keep Mensch in-house. - Mensch structured the agreement so upfront milestone payments merely covered overhead and design costs. - The upside was based strictly on a royalty per unit sold, ensuring Mensch had a direct stake in volume production.

---

[01:27:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=5260s) Royalty Terms, Accounting Pitfalls, and Working with Chuck Peddle

Mensch’s insistence on a gross unit royalty stemmed directly from the bitter lessons learned during his departure from MOS Technology. The compensation package Chuck Peddle had previously negotiated there rewarded the team with a percentage of *net profits*:

> “Chuck put together the deal—guess what it is: a percentage of profits. Well, you get to looking at who's cooking what books, you know, when will there ever be profits here? Well, you know, it's how you do your accounting, what are you assigned to this and any other thing, so there were some really unhappy folks.”

Determined never to repeat that mistake, Mensch negotiated a royalty tied directly to unit volume and sales price rather than profitability:

> “‘I don't care if you make a profit or not, that's your problem, but I'm getting a percentage of whatever you sell it for.’”

Mensch reflects warmly on his enduring friendship with Chuck Peddle despite past frictions, describing their dynamic as a synergy between two distinct temperaments. Comparing Peddle to Steve Jobs, Mensch explains that Peddle possessed a rare ability to orchestrate complex deals:

> “‘There's got to be a pony around here with all this crap,’ and so I think Chuck can put together some interesting deals that only Chuck can put together, it's just like a Steve Jobs in a way, and so if you know him that way, life is exciting, so to speak—opportunities.”

---

[01:29:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=5380s) Reverse-Engineering Toshiba and Tramiel’s Tactical Gambit

Although Mensch successfully engineered the chips, Commodore never put his designs into production. Tramiel's objective was commercial leverage rather than manufacturing. Mensch reverse-engineered the Toshiba LC5003 (LC5K3), a complex serial-processor calculator chip. Reverse-engineering this chip proved exceptionally demanding because Toshiba had embedded hidden ion-implanted resistors under the surface that could not be seen under optical inspection:

> “It's hard to reverse engineer an LCD—implanted resistors, you can't see them on the surface, so you go, ‘How is that happening?’ And you have these nodes that aren't connected up to anything; well, they've implanted resistors in there you couldn't see, so I had to figure that out.”

In addition to buried resistors, Toshiba had placed deliberate "phantom circuits" across the die that performed no electrical function and served purely to mislead competitive teardowns. Mensch deciphered the architecture and delivered a fully functioning equivalent, but Tramiel used the completed design solely to force Toshiba to cut its prices:

> “What he did was, when I—I duplicated the LC5K3 chip out of Toshiba... but guess what Jack wanted to do: he wanted to get the Japanese price, which was half of the American price, so he wasn't going to buy any chips—he wasn't going to build any of my chips. He wanted the chip to design so he could go back as a negotiating [tool].”

Mensch noted that as a natural gambler, Tramiel cared strictly about bottom-line component costs rather than running an internal silicon fabrication line if Toshiba could be pressured into matching target pricing.

- The target chip was the Toshiba LC5003 (LC5K3) serial-processor calculator IC. - Toshiba employed optical decoys, including dummy "phantom circuits" and buried ion-implanted resistors beneath unconnected metal nodes. - Tramiel leveraged Mensch’s working design to secure the Japanese domestic component price (roughly 50% of the export price charged to American firms).

---

[01:31:31](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=5491s) Architecting a Variable-Nibble 4-Bit RISC Scientific Processor

After the serial five-function calculator project, Commodore aimed to enter the scientific calculator market. Serial calculation was far too slow for scientific operations, prompting Mensch to architect a parallel 4-bit RISC processor. The standard 8-bit NMOS 6502 core was unsuitable because scientific operations require variable-precision floating-point arithmetic (ranging from 24-bit single-precision mantissas and exponents up to 64-bit double precision) while keeping the silicon die size tiny:

> “A 4-bit RISC processor—it had like 16 instructions, but what I had was a field, a 4-bit field that would tell you how many nibbles. So if I wanted to do a 64-bit, I'd have a 16 4-bit nibbles... that could do 4, 8, 12, 16, all the way to 64-bit.”

Mensch developed this architecture alongside a software programmer named Shiraz (who worked either from India or Northern California), with Chuck Peddle largely absent from day-to-day technical development. Mensch also sought help from Will Mathis. Although primarily a semiconductor device engineer who had to absorb microprocessor architectural theory from market demands, Mensch engineered the 4-bit RISC instruction set to directly interface with liquid crystal displays (LCDs) while efficiently executing arbitrary multi-nibble mathematical operations without the die-area overhead of an 8-bit core.

- **Architecture:** 4-bit parallel RISC processor with a compact ~16-instruction set. - **Variable-Length Math:** A dedicated 4-bit field specified the nibble count, supporting arithmetic word lengths from 4 bits to 64 bits in 4-bit increments (4, 8, 12, 16... 64 bits). - **Target Workloads:** Fast scientific floating-point math (e.g., 24-bit mantissa/exponent representations and 64-bit precision) and direct driving of LCD display interfaces. - **Personnel:** Designed by Bill Mensch in collaboration with firmware engineer Shiraz, with consultation from Will Mathis.

[01:34:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=5654s) The DRAM Achilles' Heel in Calculator Design

Mensch reflects on an early design flaw that proved fatal for a low-power calculator chip project. Jack Tramiel’s son, Sam Tramiel, was in Japan at the time and understood the rigorous demands of the handheld calculator market: even a single microampere of standby current was intolerable. Unaware of this strict power constraint, Mensch drew upon semiconductor techniques he had studied during his stint at Integrated Circuit Engineering (ICE) under Glen Madland. Attempting to save silicon area compared to bulky static memory cells, he integrated a single-transistor, non-self-aligned metal-gate dynamic RAM (DRAM) onto the chip.

Although the DRAM functioned as designed, its reliance on periodic refresh cycles pushed standby power dissipation far beyond the 1 µA ceiling. Mensch candidly acknowledges this design choice as an Achilles' heel born of engineering isolation: “So here I am thinking the semiconductor technology that I knew, and I got it to work and it works fine—worked fine, but too much power.” The refresh requirement meant the part consumed well over a microamp, rendering it unsuitable for the Japanese calculator market.

- Sam Tramiel was tracking Japanese calculator industry specifications, where standby current had to remain strictly below 1 µA. - Mensch implemented a 1-transistor (1T) metal-gate DRAM using non-self-aligned gates to minimize die area. - The continuous refresh cycle inevitably drew excess current, spoiling the chip’s viability for battery-operated handheld devices.

---

[01:35:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=5724s) Commodore’s Exit, Jack Tramiel’s Exclusivity, and the Xerox Lifeline

When asked how the Western Design Center (WDC) became involved with the 65C02, Mensch explains that Commodore had zero interest in a CMOS version of the 6502. The existing NMOS 6502 was already far lower in power than competing microprocessors from Intel or Motorola, providing plenty of efficiency for personal computers like the Commodore PET.

Around late 1980, after internal strife led Irving Gould to oust Jack Tramiel from Commodore—a development Mensch only fully understood years later upon reading Brian Bagnall's book *On the Edge*—Commodore abruptly cut ties with Mensch’s fledgling operation. A design manager from California arrived with a truck and stripped the office of every piece of equipment they claimed to own. Jack Tramiel had imposed strict exclusivity terms on Mensch: “Jack said exclusive: ‘You don't work for anybody else, you work for me, you don't work for anybody else.’” Because Mensch had interpreted this restriction literally, he had deliberately avoided building a sales pipeline or pitching other clients. Suddenly, he was left with an empty office, a $50,000 promissory note due in six months, three children under the age of six, and zero paying customers.

In desperation, Mensch called Bob Marco at Xerox. Xerox had earlier attempted to secure a portion of Mensch's consulting time by offering Commodore access to their most advanced fabrication process, but Commodore vice president Bud Frye had flatly refused, insisting on 100% of Mensch’s dedication. Now unencumbered, Mensch flew out on a credit card to meet Marco just before the Christmas holidays. After hearing that Commodore had vanished, Marco summoned his secretary, who returned with an envelope containing a $25,000 check. Stunned, Mensch asked why Marco would hand over that kind of money without a contract. As Mensch recounts, Marco offered a blunt reality check about rare engineering talent: “Bill, when a microprocessor design engineer becomes available, you lock them down.” Xerox engaged Mensch to teach their internal engineering team how to design microprocessors. To deliver on the agreement, Mensch hired his sister Diane and trained her in mask design in just five weeks.

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: Western Design Center Transition from Commodore to Xerox accDescr: Diagram tracing the fallout from Commodore's departure to Xerox's emergency funding. subgraph Commodore["Commodore Departure (Late 1980)"] A["Jack Tramiel ousted by Irving Gould"] --> B["Commodore truck repossesses equipment"] B --> C["Mensch left with $50k note & 3 young kids"] end subgraph Xerox["Xerox Intervention"] C --> D["Call to Bob Marco at Xerox"] D --> E["Marco provides immediate $25k retainer"] E --> F["Contract to train Xerox engineers"] F --> G["Mensch trains sister Diane in mask design"] end ```

---

[01:40:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=6032s) Mitel, GTE, and the Genesis of OxyCMOS

The path to the CMOS 65C02 emerged out of professional ties Mensch had formed while teaching microprocessor seminars for management at ICE. Attendees included Fran Krch, a marketing executive from Micro-Mo Electronics / EM Semi, and Dr. Desmond Sheehan, an executive with a doctorate from Stanford and an undergraduate degree from Scotland. Sheehan, then Vice President of Technology at GTE Lenkurt, had convinced GTE corporate to invest heavily in semiconductor manufacturing and urgently needed silicon designs to justify the capital expense of their fabrication line.

Sheehan dispatched Mensch on his first international flight to GTE’s ATEA division near Antwerp, Belgium, to analyze a telephone key-system design based on the Motorola 6802. Around that time, Mensch discovered that Mitel Semiconductor possessed a cutting-edge unipolar-doped polysilicon, oxide-isolated CMOS process that dramatically reduced parasitic capacitance. Recognizing that this process was the future of low-power computing, Mensch established his own proprietary set of design rules dubbed "OxyCMOS" (Oxide-Isolated CMOS).

Through serendipity, Mensch learned that Mitel had licensed its oxide-isolated CMOS process and a 6802 implementation to GTE. He contacted Mitel's sales arm and flew on short notice to meet them in freezing winter weather (roughly -30°F) in Canada via an airport connecting to Ottawa. Mitel revealed that their contract design team in Lake Tahoe had botched their CMOS 6802 design: it crawled at an abysmal 250 kHz rather than its 5 MHz target frequency. The designers had neglected the project in favor of skiing and partying (“two forms of snow,” as Mensch dryly remarks), and Mitel had promptly fired them. Mensch evaluated the design and told Mitel that while hitting 5 MHz was unrealistic without a total ground-up redesign, he could salvage the layout to run reliably at 1 to 2 MHz—matching the performance of the NMOS original. Mitel wrote him an upfront check for $15,000 on the spot, providing another vital financial runway.

Equipped with the functional requirements gathered from GTE's ATEA division in Belgium, Mensch drafted two distinct development proposals for GTE: one around the 6802, and another reviving and advancing the 6502 architecture in CMOS. This sparked immediate political tension inside GTE: the operations vice president, Hollis Wilkins, was an ex-Motorola executive surrounded by former Motorola staff who harbored lingering resentment toward Mensch for walking out of Motorola years earlier to create the rival 6502.

- Fran Krch and Dr. Desmond Sheehan connected with Mensch through his ICE microprocessor management seminars. - GTE ATEA in Antwerp, Belgium, required a low-power microprocessor for a proprietary telephone key system. - Mitel Semiconductor developed a pioneering oxide-isolated, unipolar-doped polysilicon CMOS fabrication technology. - Mitel's Lake Tahoe engineering team was fired after delivering a defective CMOS 6802 that reached only 250 kHz instead of the targeted 5 MHz. - Mensch agreed to patch Mitel's 6802 to 1–2 MHz for an upfront payment of $15,000. - Mensch formulated his own "OxyCMOS" design methodology and submitted competing proposals to GTE for a CMOS 6802 versus an updated CMOS 6502.

[01:46:36](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=6396s) Pitching the 65C02 to GTE and Winning the Design

Bill Mensch recounts a high-stakes meeting held in the office of Otis Wolkins at GTE Microcircuits, alongside GTE Vice President Dezső “Dez” Toky. At the time, the personnel involved had Motorola backgrounds, and the original MOS Technology 6502 had previously stolen some of Motorola’s thunder. Mensch went into the meeting to pitch two different design approaches: a two-chip version based on the Motorola 6802 architecture versus a single-chip solution based on the 6502 (the CMOS 65C02). After hearing the presentation, Wolkins looked at Dez and Mensch and stepped out of the room, saying he would be right back. Mensch initially assumed Wolkins had simply gone to the restroom. In reality, Wolkins had gone down the hall to consult Fran Krch. Krch gave Wolkins a fundamental piece of semiconductor wisdom: “Hey, it's been my experience that the smallest chip wins every time.”

Wolkins returned to the office, turned over full authority to Toky, and said, “It's your call, Dez. You're the man, you make the choice.” Toky immediately decided: “It's 6502-based.” Mensch was stunned and deeply moved by the outcome; as he puts it, “I got emotional, but I had to wait until I got in my car.” When the interviewer asks if the decision surprised him, Mensch explains that while it was technically the correct path, “sometimes in big corporations the right decision isn't made.” Toky genuinely understood technology, trusted the architecture, and made the bold call. Under this licensing arrangement, Mensch went on to design every single chip in GTE’s microprocessor portfolio as a licensed CMOS family. Rockwell International licensed the design almost immediately afterward, during the very same week, embedding billions of 65C02 cores into modem chipsets.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: GTE 65C02 Selection Process accDescr: Flowchart illustrating how GTE decided between the 6802 and 6502 architectures based on die size advice. subgraph Presentation["Evaluation"] A["Mensch pitches to GTE:<br>6802 2-chip vs. 6502 1-chip"] B["Otis Wolkins consults Fran Krch"] C["Krch's Rule:<br>'Smallest chip wins every time'"] end subgraph Decision["Selection & Licensing"] D["Wolkins delegates choice to VP Dez Toky"] E["Toky selects 6502 architecture (65C02)"] F["GTE & Rockwell license 65C02"] end A --> B B --> C C --> D D --> E E --> F ```

- Otis Wolkins left the pitch meeting specifically to seek the counsel of Fran Krch regarding chip area and manufacturing economics. - Dezső Toky had complete decision-making latitude from Wolkins and chose the 6502 architecture on the spot. - GTE became the first official CMOS licensee, followed within days by Rockwell International, who integrated the 65C02 core into high-volume dial-up modems.

---

[01:48:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=6529s) Billions of Units and the Architectural Advantage of Zero Page

Reflecting on the total volume of 65xx and 65Cxx processors produced globally, Mensch estimates that cumulative production has reached between 5 and 10 billion units over the preceding 15 years, with the Western Design Center (WDC) continuing to move roughly 100 million units annually. He points out that while the public associates the 6502 with famous microcomputers—Apple selling an estimated 5 to 10 million Apple IIe and IIc units, and Commodore selling perhaps 50 million machines—the vast majority of volume came from unseen embedded applications. Standalone handheld video game units sold at Walmart for $15 contained his 65816 core on a single system-on-a-chip (SoC) costing as little as 25 cents. Floppy disk drive controllers, modems, and obscure embedded consumer devices easily absorbed billions of units.

When asked why the architecture captured such enduring dominance, Mensch argues that computer scientists and marketers failed to properly categorize its architectural elegance: “The architecture was never labeled properly, ever.” Unlike its competitors, the 6502’s addressable register architecture (particularly zero-page addressing) allowed direct, three-cycle access to the first 256 bytes of memory as if they were CPU registers. This allowed the 6502 to perform floating-point mathematics faster than Intel chips or the Zilog Z80, despite having far fewer internal registers on the die. Mensch recalls GTE running comprehensive, instruction-level benchmarks and coming back to him in astonishment: “Bill, did you know how awesome your microprocessor is in comparison to like the Z80 and the 6800 and the 8080?” Mensch simply replied, “Really?” To him, the internal pipelining and minimalist transistor count extracted the maximum possible efficiency out of an 8-bit machine, outperforming competing silicon by two to four times.

- Cumulative production of 65xx-family processors stands between 5 and 10 billion units, sustained by an ongoing run rate of approximately 100 million units per year. - High-volume embedded applications (modems, disk controllers, dedicated gaming toys) vastly outstripped personal computer sales like the Apple II or Commodore 64. - Zero-page memory functioned as 256 addressable internal registers with 3-clock-cycle execution, giving the CPU superior floating-point math throughput compared to the Intel 8080 and Zilog Z80.

---

[01:52:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=6762s) Inventing Semiconductor IP Licensing

Mensch traces his pioneering business model—licensing microprocessor intellectual property (IP) rather than owning fabrication lines—back to a consulting lesson taught to him by Glenn Madland. Madland explained that in consulting, one could write a study for a primary client, reuse that knowledge to present a seminar, and then publish the findings as a book, thereby monetizing the same intellectual labor three times while keeping every party satisfied. Mensch realized he could adapt that model to microprocessors: “So I'm thinking, hey, if I design a 65C02 and I license it 10 times, that is better than what Glenn was doing.” Rather than tying silicon to captive wafer fabs or trading masks for second-source agreements (as American Microsystems, Inc. [AMI] did with Motorola), Mensch chose to license core building blocks to chipmakers who understood specific end markets better than he did.

Instead of licensing 10 times, Mensch ended up licensing his designs more than 60 times over several decades. He devised a multi-tiered revenue framework: upfront non-recurring engineering (NRE) fees to initiate a project, quarterly maintenance fees, and per-unit production royalties. Mensch used the mandatory quarterly fee as a litmus test to verify whether a licensee possessed a competent accounting system capable of tracking and remitting royalty streams. He remained flexible with deal terms to capture different opportunities, including ongoing collaborations with Chuck Peddle. As Mensch summarizes his strategic shift: “For me, changing the equation is licensing for a fee at first, and then for fee and royalties, and then just to prove that they had an accounting system early on, I have a quarterly fee.” Once financial transparency was established, Mensch viewed his primary role as being an enthusiastic cheerleader for his licensees' commercial success.

- Glenn Madland’s “triple-monetization” consulting framework inspired Mensch to treat semiconductor architectures as reusable, licensable IP. - WDC licensed the 65C02 core more than 60 times across the semiconductor industry. - The business model combined upfront NRE, mandatory quarterly licensing retainers to validate accounting systems, and per-unit production royalties.

---

[01:56:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=6990s) Life-Support Applications: Pacemakers and Defibrillators

When asked to name his favorite application of the 65C02, Mensch emphasizes that he has favorites across many different product categories, but the medical domain stands out above all others. WDC supplied 65C02 chips for implantable cardiac defibrillators and pacemakers. Ensuring medical reliability was grueling and expensive: testing to screen out infant mortality cost over $100 per chip. Mensch explains that if a processor passed these burn-in tests without failure, it could be trusted to last inside a patient for years, avoiding the catastrophe of early device failure. At the time, incumbent suppliers were abandoning the high-reliability custom semiconductor space: Motorola, Harris, and Intersil stepped back, leaving antiquated solutions like the RCA 1802 as alternatives.

Mensch licensed his CMOS processor to ELA Médical (then an affiliate of the Sanofi/L'Oréal pharmaceutical group), which became the first company to embed a microprocessor inside the human body for life-support functions. Reaching Mensch was difficult because his standard contracts included strict non-disclosure terms prohibiting licensees from disclosing where they acquired the intellectual property. An Australian medical device company spent two full years hunting for the original designer after noticing identical instruction sets in chips offered by GTE and other semiconductor manufacturers. Eventually, someone breached the secrecy clause and pointed the Australian team directly to Mensch, enabling further deployment of the 65C02 in implantable medical hardware.

- Life-testing and burn-in procedures to eliminate semiconductor infant mortality exceeded $100 per unit for implantable defibrillator silicon. - Major semiconductor manufacturers, including Motorola, Harris, and Intersil, exited the life-support custom silicon business during this era. - ELA Médical deployed the 65C02 to pioneer microprocessor-driven human life-support implants. - WDC agreements contained strict secrecy clauses barring licensees from revealing WDC as the IP source, leading an Australian medical firm on a two-year search to locate Mensch.

### [01:58:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=7114s) Customer Indemnification and Medical Liability Bill Mensch reflects on why medical customers came specifically to him when looking for the 6502 architecture. Companies like Rockwell shared the exact same instruction set and claimed it was their microprocessor, but knowledgeable insiders directed clients back to the original source: Mensch himself. When asked why customers chose his small firm over the industry giants, the reality came down to corporate risk tolerance and litigation fears:

> “Why are you picking me? Because we can do business; the other guys are getting out of it for one reason: lawyers.”

If a medical device malfunctioned, the resulting lawsuits posed an unacceptable risk to major corporations, prompting them to abandon the space. Mensch agreed to supply the technology, but on strict protective conditions: he required clients to fully indemnify him against all liability. In court, his stance was clean and transparent—he would hand over all source files, documentation, and institutional knowledge to the customer, making him one of the rare semiconductor leaders entirely indemnified by his own clients. As Mensch put it, the ethical and commercial priority was unmistakable:

> “The problem is that you cannot *not* use the world's best microprocessors to save lives.”

### [01:59:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=7192s) Enhancing the 6502 Architecture: GTE, Telenet, and Rockwell When Stephen Diamond asks how the 6502 architecture evolved over the years, Mensch emphasizes that “listening to your customer is a good thing.” A major wave of enhancements originated through GTE Microcircuits, who sent him to Vienna, Virginia to meet with Telenet—pioneers of early DARPA packet switching. Telenet engineers reported that no other processor on the market could match the performance of the 6502 for packet-switching tasks. However, to handle multi-processor environments cleanly, they requested a hardware Memory Lock signal to protect read-modify-write sequences from bus interference, alongside a handful of bit manipulation instructions.

Soon after, Rockwell approached Mensch requesting their own set of bit manipulation features. He incorporated these into the design—specifically instructions to Set Memory Bit (SMB), Reset/Clear Memory Bit (RMB), Branch on Bit Set (BBS), and Branch on Bit Clear (BBC). While Mensch implemented them to satisfy Rockwell, these opcodes later conflicted with the opcode map he developed for his own 16-bit processor, the 65C816. Other licensees, such as NCR, took the designs as delivered without requesting additions, but Mensch continually adapted the silicon whenever key partners brought operational requirements to the table.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Evolution of 6502 Architecture Enhancements accDescr: Diagram showing feature requests from GTE Telenet and Rockwell integrated into the CMOS 6502 line.

subgraph Customers["Customer Feature Requests"] GTE["GTE / Telenet<br/>(DARPA Packet Switching)"] RCK["Rockwell"] end

subgraph Features["Architectural Additions"] ML["Memory Lock (ML)<br/>Protects Read-Modify-Write"] BM["Bit Operations:<br/>SMB, RMB, BBS, BBC"] end

subgraph Core["Enhanced 65C02 Core"] C02["W65C02 Microprocessor"] end

GTE --> ML RCK --> BM ML --> C02 BM --> C02 ```

### [02:01:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=7297s) The Birth of the 16-Bit 65C816 and Apple's Rejection When Diamond asks how the architecture jumped from 8-bit to 16-bit, Mensch admits that originally “nobody wanted it, but I wanted it.” He calculated that if he could engineer a 16-bit microprocessor with 100% backward compatibility with the existing 8-bit instruction set, the industry would embrace it. He entered discussions with Apple, where engineers (and Steve Wozniak, who was returning to develop what was then called the Apple IIx, later the Apple IIgs) listed desired 16-bit capabilities. However, Apple cautioned him from the outset that they had no intention of adopting his chip.

Mensch pressed ahead regardless, applying a trick learned during his Motorola days: he developed the pin-compatible 65C802, which dropped directly into existing Apple II motherboard sockets, as well as the full-fledged 65C816. It became the first microprocessor capable of directly emulating its predecessor generation. Yet at their final design review at Apple, management reiterated their refusal:

> “Bill, you know we're not going to use it; we have our own 16-bit microprocessor.”

When Mensch asked what that processor was, they pointed to the Motorola 68000. Crushed, Mensch returned to Arizona to rally his small team:

> “I came back, addressed my team with tears in my eye: ‘This is the right thing to do; somebody will want it.’”

The project was executed through sheer grit. Operating as an independent entrepreneur, Mensch drafted the logic design at home on a game table, while his sister drew all of the physical layout by hand because the rest of Western Design Center's staff were committed to funded client contracts. Mensch took pride in the fact that a brother-and-sister team produced the world's only backward-compatible 16-bit microprocessor. *Newsweek* highlighted the processor by comparing it to the Roman god Janus, who looks forward into the future and backward into the past simultaneously.

### [02:04:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=7496s) Triumph in the Apple IIgs and Apple Veteran Anecdotes Despite their initial rejection, Apple reversed course and selected the 65C816 for the Apple IIgs (Graphics and Sound). Dan Hillman, the project lead on the IIgs printed circuit board design, invited Mensch to Apple's offices without revealing the reason. When Mensch entered the room filled with hardware engineers, Hillman handed him the very first fully populated IIgs motherboard:

> “Dan hands me the first PCB that was fully stuffed; it says, ‘Bill, I want you to hold this.’”

The gesture deeply moved Mensch, even as surrounding Apple engineers grumbled good-naturedly about an outside silicon designer being granted the honor of holding the board first.

Mensch also recalls his deep connection with Wendell Sanders, a veteran engineer instrumental to the Apple III project whose son later headed Apple's iPod division. Sanders had visited Mensch's home while building his own retreat in the mountains. The two reconnected years later when Sanders was hunting for a rare white ceramic 6502 to complete his original Apple-1 board. Mensch notes that MOS Technology originally packaged early 6501 and 6502 samples in white (and occasionally purple) ceramic with removable lids so engineers could probe the silicon during prototyping, whereas commercial production rapidly migrated to inexpensive plastic packages to drive volume and lower manufacturing costs.

### [02:08:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=7698s) Inventing the Fabless Semiconductor Model at Apple Prompted to discuss his later educational initiatives, Mensch takes a vital detour to describe how Western Design Center pioneered the fabless semiconductor business model out of necessity during a tense procurement crisis at Apple headquarters. Apple convened a high-stakes meeting to finalize dual-sourcing for the Apple IIgs 65C816 silicon. Present in the room were Steve Wozniak, other Apple executives, representatives from GTE Microcircuits, and Bob Jones representing NCR out of Fort Collins, Colorado (NCR and Rockwell had previously partnered on the CMOS 6500/1 single-chip microcontroller, dubbed the Austin chip):

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Emergence of the Fabless Semiconductor Model accDescr: Apple demands a second silicon source after NCR pulls out, leading WDC to contract foundries directly.

subgraph Meeting["Apple IIgs Sourcing Meeting"] APL["Apple (Wozniak & Team)"] GTE_S["GTE Microcircuits (Source 1: Committed)"] NCR_S["NCR (Bob Jones: Refuses to participate)"] end

subgraph Solution["WDC Fabless Sourcing Pivot"] WDC["Bill Mensch (WDC)"] Foundries["Foundry Partners<br/>(AMI, Synertek, later Sanyo)"] end

NCR_S -->|"Declines 816 production"| APL APL -->|"Requires dual-source guarantee"| WDC WDC -->|"Retargets design rules"| Foundries Foundries -->|"Wafers supplied directly to WDC"| WDC WDC -->|"Acts as independent second source"| APL ```

When called upon, GTE confirmed they were fully licensed and prepared to produce the chips. But when Bob Jones was asked if NCR was on board, he answered bluntly: "We're not in." With Apple requiring two independent manufacturing sources to greenlight production, Mensch had to improvise instantly: - He asked Apple who manufactured their proprietary custom ASICs (such as AMI or Synertek). - Upon confirming that Apple already audited and approved the silicon quality of those foundries, Mensch pledged to retarget his 65C816 layout to those identical design rules. - Western Design Center would purchase the raw processed wafers directly from the foundry, test and package them, and act as the certified second source itself alongside GTE.

By decoupling the design and marketing of silicon from the capital ownership of fabrication facilities, Mensch laid the direct operational blueprint for the fabless semiconductor model. Shortly thereafter, Sanyo became a core manufacturing licensee, delivering pristine wafer quality for Western Design Center products.

[02:10:55](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=7855s) Sanyo, the Fabless Model, and the FSA

Bill Mensch explains that in the early days of Western Design Center (WDC), Sanyo served as a full manufacturing partner. Sanyo had licensed the technology and wanted to prove it could run reliably on their foundry lines, which meant they handled testing, packaging, and wafer fabrication under that license. Mensch occasionally paid for certain runs, but the arrangement effectively gave WDC an end-to-end fabless business model as early as 1984.

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: Western Design Center Fabless Relationship with Sanyo accDescr: Bill Mensch's WDC designs chips and licenses them to Sanyo, which tests, packages, and fabricates them.

subgraph WDC["Western Design Center (1984)"] A["IP Design & Architecture"] end

subgraph Sanyo["Sanyo Foundry"] B["Wafer Fabrication"] C["Testing & Packaging"] end

A -->|"Licensing & Tooling"| B B --> C C -->|"Packaged Silicon"| A ```

Because of this arrangement, when the Fabless Semiconductor Association (FSA) formed about a decade later, its organizers invited Mensch to sit on the original charter board. He turned down the offer. He explains his reasoning directly: “Thanks for the invitation but I can't do it. The reason why is because I don't want Sanyo to even ever think I needed anybody else for my fabless model.” He told them to go ahead and figure it out on their own, wishing them well and enjoying their progress from afar. He remained a member for a period and kept receiving their mailings, but he preserved his exclusive reliance on Sanyo.

[02:12:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=7922s) Engineering as Applied Science and the Philosophy of Embedded Intelligence

Mensch reflects on the purpose of engineering and how it connects to human learning. He defines engineering cleanly: “Engineering is the practical application of science and math.” Electrical engineering focuses on electronics, and semiconductor engineering dives into the physics of materials to exploit the movement of electrons. Having worked across these levels, Mensch believes students and makers need access to microprocessors in every format: - Intellectual property (synthesizable Verilog HDL models of all WDC chips) - Packaged semiconductor silicon chips - Modern single-board computers introduced around October 2014, designed to plug into any PC, Mac, or mobile device via a USB port to serve as a power source and terminal

Mensch groups laptops, phones, and personal computers under the broad umbrella term “smart things,” meaning anything driven by a microprocessor. He connects these small boards directly to the modern maker movement. While acknowledging Steve Wozniak as the classic arch-maker, Mensch observes that makers are simply people driven by the raw joy of making something with their own hands and watching it work.

He places his life's work in a specific category: embedded intelligence technology. He argues that computing is not fundamentally about giant mainframes housed on raised-floor computer rooms requiring massive air-conditioning units: “There's only one reason you design a microprocessor, and that one reason is to embed intelligence into things.” The intelligence becomes complete only when sensors and actuators are attached and software code is written to control real-world behavior.

[02:15:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=8101s) The Bill and Diane Mensch Foundation and the "E-I-E-I-O" Vision

Drawing inspiration from Glen Myers' insight that integrated circuits must be taught, Mensch established the Bill and Diane Mensch Foundation to support education around embedded intelligence, a cause he had already funded personally for over a quarter of a century. He believes education must underpin the shift from an information age into an “age of understanding.”

His educational ambition starts long before college or even fifth grade; he wants to reach parents in the nursery. About four and a half years prior, while attending an advisory meeting for the University of Notre Dame held near Stanford University in Palo Alto, he lay awake one night reworking the classic nursery rhyme “Old MacDonald Had a Farm” into an educational mnemonic: - **Old Man Stanford had a farm,** - **And on that farm they built a university,** - **And at that university they learned about Embedded Intelligence,** - **And with that embedded intelligence they created Engineering Innovations,** - **With Opportunity for all:** - **E-I-E-I-O** *(Embedded Intelligence, Engineering Innovations, Opportunity)*

Mensch believes that if mothers and fathers recognize their newborn child possesses an innate embedded intelligence, they will nurture what the child does with it. Programming oneself with information and learning to process it benefits the learner first, and once a person achieves mastery, they have plenty left over to help others.

[02:19:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=8347s) Looking Back: The 6530, KIM-1, and Meeting the "Happy Hunting Ground"

Asked whether he foresaw where computing would go 43 years earlier when he worked on the Motorola 6800 PIA, Mensch readily admits he had no idea of the scale: “No, no, no.” Yet he understood that the technology was fundamentally shifting the equation. At MOS Technology, their explicit commercial goal was to undercut Intel's 4040 chipset on price. To hit that cost target, Mensch engineered the 6530, an all-in-one support chip combining: - ROM - RAM - Programmable I/O - An interval timer

Paired with the 6502, the 6530 formed a minimal two-chip microcomputer system. That exact pairing powered the KIM-1 (Keyboard Input Monitor) board, which carried a machine-code monitor in ROM and sold roughly 50,000 units, becoming one of the most widely used and beloved single-board computers in computing history. Synertek produced a companion board called the SYM-1 (designed with Manny Lemus), while Mensch built a TIM (Teletype Input Monitor) variant that ran on paper tape and powered his production test fixtures for the 6502 and peripheral chips for two and a half years.

Mensch admits they far overshot their modest original goal of rivaling the 4040. He recalls an intimate conversation with Rod Orgill on the second floor of MOS Technology in Pennsylvania. As Mensch recounts Orgill's words: “Rod said, ‘If this works as good as we think it's going to work... we can go to the happy hunting ground’—an Indian saying for heaven—‘knowing we did something very special with our lives.’” By December 1973, right before the birth of his first child, Mensch had told Chuck Peddle that they could build a full home computer out of those chips. The processor went on to power the Apple II, Atari computers, the Commodore VIC-20 and 64, and the BBC Micro (the “Beeb”).

Mensch points out that the BBC Micro directly seeded the ARM architecture, as the Acorn engineers built their prototype using the 6502. Those Acorn designers were also the only engineers who ever asked Mensch about the abort feature he had implemented on the W65C816. Diamond asks him to explain how it works, and Mensch recalls getting the concept from upgrading his CAD minicomputer from a Prime 300 to a virtual-memory Prime 500: when a memory fetch targets an address where physical memory is not currently mapped, the processor must abort the operation cleanly, trap, and let memory management adjust or page the physical bus locations before resuming.

[02:24:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=8642s) Processor Architecture: The Abort Mechanism and ARM

Bill Mensch explains his original architectural solution for handling bus faults and memory errors: introducing an abort mechanism directly into the processor. When the CPU attempts an operation and an external signal indicates that the addressed memory or peripheral is unavailable, the internal state of the processor remains frozen and uncorrupted. Instead of advancing incorrectly, the CPU branches immediately to an interrupt service routine that signals an error, allows the system to repair the condition, and then retries the operation cleanly.

Mensch points out that ARM later incorporated this exact mechanism into their own processors. Although he discussed the matter with lawyers in Philadelphia when serving as an expert witness for Samsung—who wanted to pursue ARM over it—he ultimately chose not to litigate. Reflecting on this decision and his approach to circuit and system design, Mensch notes: “they didn't duplicate my 816. they used my idea but i never i i never pursued them”. He emphasizes that throughout his engineering career, he implemented such features simply because “it just felt right and so i wanted to do it and i did it”.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Abort and Retry Architecture accDescr: Flow diagram illustrating Bill Mensch's processor abort feature and error recovery loop. subgraph Execution["1. Execution Attempt"] A["CPU Bus Access"] --> B{"Target Ready?"} end subgraph AbortHandler["2. Abort Handling"] B -- "No" --> C["Trigger Abort Signal"] C --> D["Freeze Internal CPU State<br/>(No register changes)"] D --> E["Branch to Interrupt Routine"] end subgraph Recovery["3. Repair and Retry"] E --> F["Repair Error Condition"] F --> G["Retry Instruction Cleanly"] B -- "Yes" --> H["Normal Processing Complete"] end ```

[02:25:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=8715s) Educational Hardware and the XCELR8R Series

When asked what is next for him and Western Design Center, Mensch points to new hardware development boards shown to the interviewer earlier that day. He regards this project as the single most exciting initiative of his entire career because it removes the intermediate layers. Rather than watching third parties like Apple, Atari, Commodore, or Nintendo build end products around his silicon, WDC is now putting development hardware directly into the hands of students, teachers, and makers who want full control over their systems.

He recalls how professors and teachers cherished the synchronous bus of the Apple II for laboratory experiments, a capability lost when asynchronous, complex personal computers took over. After Steve Jobs discontinued the Apple II line to clear education space for the Macintosh—a decision Mensch calls a major disappointment—neither Commodore nor Atari stepped in to fill that specific pedagogical void. WDC's new development hardware fills that gap by complementing modern "smart things" (tablets, laptops, smartphones) rather than duplicating their high-resolution screens or audio subsystems. Instead, the boards provide real-world synchronous input/output through a core operational loop:

- **Sensing:** Capturing real-world inputs from sensors and signals. - **Processing:** Handling data deterministically on human-understandable 65xx architecture. - **Communicating:** Interfacing with parent devices via standards such as USB. - **Actuating:** Driving physical peripherals, including motors and lights.

This ecosystem is branded as the "XCELR8R" (Accelerator) line, with the letters X, C, E, L, R, and 8 arranged in the corners of an stylized 'X' logo. Mensch sees these boards as serving learners from kindergarten up to postdoctoral researchers. Students can start with simple peripheral control, advance to programmable logic devices (CPLDs/FPGAs), and ultimately retarget their designs to production ASICs using WDC's IP. Mensch harbors no hostility toward ARM's dominant industry role, saying with paternal pride: “we think of arm as our practical son got to do what they got to do and it's not something i want to do but i'm proud of them i they start it with my technology and i wish them well”.

[02:30:20](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=9020s) The Maker Movement and Democratic Creativity

Stephen Diamond asks whether the contemporary Maker movement is a direct modern descendant of the personal and home computer wave sparked by the 6502 in the mid-1970s. Mensch acknowledges the historical line, while deferring credit: “did i start it i don't know if i go that far i think the technology was available for people that saw that that wanted to be part of that”. He references Steve Wozniak, whose Apple work built the foundation for what grew into one of the world's most valuable companies and recognizable brands.

Mensch expresses genuine awe at the scale of modern engineering—such as holding 16 gigabytes of storage in an ultra-thin handheld device—and recalls his own early maker roots. When designing the W65C265S microcontroller, he insisted on including four full UARTs on a single chip, despite his software collaborator and mentor, Larry, questioning the necessity of having more than one or two. Mensch defended the architecture because a self-contained system needed concurrent channels for a PC interface, a printer, a modem, and a keyboard. He implemented this exact philosophy in his Mensch Computer reference design, producing a limited run of 100 units. To him, modern platforms like Arduino, Raspberry Pi, and TI LaunchPad are valuable tools in that same spirit: “this maker movement is very important and i think it synergizes or energizes humanity in a way that's never been done before”. He defines WDC’s mission as providing simple, elegant design blocks, summarizing his business philosophy: “we're not successful until you're successful”.

[02:33:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=9224s) The 1984 Wall Street Journal Notebook Prediction

Given the opportunity to place something on the permanent historical record that is not widely known, Mensch shares an anecdote from 1984. The *Wall Street Journal* ran a major technology piece in the left-hand column of the second section front page (commonly known as the "second front page"). A reporter phoned Mensch unexpectedly while preparing an article keyed to the upcoming launch of the Apple IIc.

Around that time, Apple adopted the CMOS 65C02 microprocessor for the Apple IIc and later retrofitted it into the Apple //e (Enhanced). According to Mensch, Wozniak evaluated the 65C02 and found it performed certain Apple BASIC routines roughly 20 percent faster because of Mensch’s instruction set and cycle-efficiency improvements. When the *Wall Street Journal* published its feature, it concluded with a direct quote from Mensch stating that Apple could build true "notebook size" computers using the CMOS technology available right then. At a time when the portable market consisted of cumbersome "luggables" like the Osborne, Mensch envisioned slim, low-power notebook computers tailored for schoolchildren. That forward-looking closing quote ruffled feathers: “rumor has it that apple was unhappy with me because that first column was reserved for apple but bill gets his last thing in”.

[02:36:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=9412s) Wall Street Journal Publicity and Turning Down an IPO

Following an article in *The Wall Street Journal*, Bill Mensch suddenly found himself in the public spotlight. Professors at Arizona State University (ASU) and others throughout the region started asking about this engineer based out of Mesa, Arizona, wondering who he was and how he was gaining such recognition. Mensch was astonished by the sheer reach of the publication and the immediate attention it commanded. Among those who reached out was the investment banking firm Prudential-Bache, who called him directly with an offer to take the Western Design Center (WDC) public.

Around 1984 or 1985, Mensch traveled to New York to meet with Prudential-Bache at their offices on Gold Street, just off Wall Street. Standing outside the building and sitting down with the bankers, Mensch quickly realized that their worlds were completely misaligned. He recognized that going public would fundamentally derail the independent, creative life he had built for himself. Mensch explained his decision to turn them down: “And so we're like two ships passing in the night so thanks for the invitation thanks for the opportunity to talk to you about this but no thank you i'm happy doing what i'm doing and i don't know what it would look like if we did what you're thinking because it would change everything for me.” He felt he had it made, was pursuing precisely what he wanted, and had no need for their capital.

- *The Wall Street Journal* coverage triggered sudden widespread curiosity from ASU academics and financial institutions alike. - Prudential-Bache invited Mensch to meet near Wall Street on Gold Street in 1984–1985 to propose an initial public offering (IPO) for WDC. - Mensch declined the IPO offer because taking outside investment would destroy his creative autonomy and upend his ideal lifestyle.

[02:38:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0&t=9501s) ARM, the IP Licensing Model, and Reflections on Success

Later, as ARM built a massive business on the microprocessor IP licensing model that Mensch and WDC had pioneered, industry observers at conferences would approach Mensch and claim that ARM had stolen his business strategy. Mensch laughed off the accusations, replying that he had openly demonstrated the concept first: “Yeah but i gave them the idea i already knew i didn't want to do that so i don't know what they're going to do with it.” When ARM went public and achieved a market capitalization of $10 billion, colleagues asked him how he felt about seeing another company reap such vast financial rewards from that approach.

Mensch harbored no bitterness or regret. Instead, he celebrated ARM’s success, recognizing that their execution of the licensing model helped fuel the smartphone revolution: “I think that's wonderful i mean i don't want to do that but the fact that they did it and the fact that that may have made these smart things that we have in our pocket the engine for the smart things then you see the power of the business model and so i couldn't be more happy about they did it.” Having deliberately passed on building a massive corporate machine, Mensch felt completely content knowing he did not need the extra money and had stayed true to his own happiness. Stephen Diamond closed the session by thanking Mensch for his time and sharing his story, with Mensch replying that the pleasure was entirely his.

- People frequently suggested to Mensch at technical conferences that ARM had copied or stolen his intellectual property licensing model. - ARM achieved a $10 billion market valuation upon going public, proving the immense scalability of the silicon IP licensing model. - Mensch felt pride rather than regret, noting that ARM’s processors became the primary engine powering modern smartphones. - The interview concluded on Mensch’s contentment with his independent career path, followed by mutual thanks between interviewer Stephen Diamond and Mensch.

## Video description Interviewed by Stephen Diamond, on November 10, 2014 in Mountain View, California, X7273.2015

© Computer History Museum

Bill grew up on a farm north of Philadelphia. He found his way to Temple University where he studied electrical engineering, but did not complete a degree. After working at a few low-paying jobs for small companies, he found his way to Arizona where he attended the University of Arizona. After a time at Philco Ford, he got a job at Motorola that he saw as an industry leader. When he began work, he was enrolled in a one-year training program that involved rotating among four different areas of the company.

Bill eventually joined the microprocessor design group. While there he designed a PIA (Peripheral Interface Adapter), I/O buffers, clock generators, etc. When Motorola asked him to transfer to Texas, he decided to join his colleague, Chuck Peddle, and join MOS Technology in Pennsylvania where they could design their own microprocessor. They took a half dozen other Motorola people with them and set out to design a microprocessor, the 6502, which would out perform Motorola’s 6800.

The 6502 turned out to be a spectacular success. One of their prime goals was to design a product that could be sold profitably for 10% of the cost of other microprocessors of that day. They felt that they could open up many new markets with a product that cheap. In that they were very successful. It became the standard processor chip for Apple, Atari, and even the BBC Micro in England.

Bill Mensch eventually found his way back to Arizona, where he started the “Western Design Center.” WDC developed a CMOS version of the 6502 and the company continues to be active in the microprocessor market.

* Note: Transcripts represent what was said in the interview. However, to enhance meaning or add clarification, interviewees have the opportunity to modify this text afterward. This may result in discrepancies between the transcript and the video. Please refer to the transcript for further information - http://www.computerhistory.org/collections/catalog/102739969

Visit computerhistory.org/collections/oralhistories/ for more information about the Computer History Museum's Oral History Collection.

Lot Number: X7273.2015 Catalog Number: 102739969

[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne1ApyqSvm0)

中文简报

小威廉·戴维·“比尔”·门施口述史 在口述历史采访中,微处理器先驱比尔·门施(Bill Mensch)回顾了他从宾夕法尼亚州农村农场劳动者到半导体工程师的早年经历。在从亚利桑那大学毕业并进入摩托罗拉后,他掌握了多项工艺技术,设计了标准单元库,并负责开发关键的MC6820外围接口适配器(PIA)。面对芯片尺寸与布线限制,门施开创了获得专利的版图设计并实现了位级可编程I/O。然而,由于对摩托罗拉管理层违背承诺感到失望,加之公司计划迁往得克萨斯州奥斯汀,门施最终决定与查克·佩德尔(Chuck Peddle)联手出走,共同研发一款成本更低的新型微处理器。 门施出身于宾夕法尼亚州一个奶牛农场家庭,最初以技术员身份起步,后在亚利桑那大学攻读工程学位,并凭借扎实的技术背景顺利进入摩托罗拉的轮岗培训计划。 在摩托罗拉MOS部门工作期间,门施主导设计了MC6820外围接口适配器(PIA),开创了开创性的版图专利与位级可编程I/O架构,使该芯片在首次流片时便成功运行。 面对摩托罗拉将运营部门迁往奥斯汀的决定,加之管理层在流片对赌和工程奖金上食言,门施接受了查克·佩德尔的提议,离开摩托罗拉去研发一款全新且更经济的微处理器。

Original transcript

[0:06] okay it's [0:07] november 10th 2014 here at the computer [0:11] history museum [0:12] i'm steve diamond and we're doing an [0:14] oral history of bill minch [0:17] thanks bill for joining us we'll be [0:19] talking about [0:20] uh a variety of subjects and [0:25] your perceptions of of what's happened [0:28] in the past and perhaps where things are [0:29] going [0:30] in the future why don't we start out by [0:33] talking about your youth and [0:36] your education and then we'll follow [0:38] that up into [0:40] your transition into the semiconductor [0:42] world all right well thanks for inviting [0:45] me it's an honor to be here right now [0:47] and i will enjoy telling you what i know [0:51] about [0:51] my life how i got here and we'll start [0:55] then with [0:56] my growing up on a farm in pennsylvania [0:59] bucks county [1:00] about 35 miles north of philadelphia [1:04] very rural the dairy farm had like 26 [1:07] headed cattle [1:08] and i was a middle child of eight [1:11] children i grew up with [1:12] and as a result i got to explore because [1:16] it was more fun being [1:17] outside of the house rather than inside [1:19] the house [1:21] when i was probably about 10 years old [1:24] we may have gotten a tv [1:27] we had a radio like to listen to the [1:29] lone ranger [1:30] as soon as the cows milking was done for [1:33] the evening we'd run in and [1:35] try to get a good spot in front of this [1:38] tall radio and so i started out what you [1:41] would call [1:42] i call pleasant poverty so [1:45] the dairy farm to support eight children [1:48] that's the source of income 26 cattle so [1:52] my father was a small businessman [1:55] and the farm was his business he was [1:58] given that farm [1:59] by his father and so there's a lot of [2:03] history associated with that [2:05] happening i found out later in life [2:08] that my father wanted to be an engineer [2:11] and wanted to go to drexel [2:14] he wanted to be an electrical engineer [2:16] so [2:17] when you look at my past [2:20] i don't think there's many indications [2:23] that i'd be sitting here talking to you [2:26] i don't know what actually [2:30] was the path and what the guideposts [2:33] were [2:34] because it was like i was following [2:37] something but i didn't know what it was [2:40] when is the first time you thought of [2:43] yourself [2:44] as possibly an engineer [2:48] it was probably when i was about when i [2:50] was an engineer [2:52] in other words the reason why i went to [2:55] college was [2:56] because i took the academic classes in [2:58] my high school [3:00] and i really didn't know even what that [3:02] meant so therefore [3:04] i took the classes that i was interested [3:06] in i suppose [3:08] math and science but for me to [3:11] i never thought i was going to be an [3:12] engineer i thought i was going to be a [3:14] laborer [3:15] because that's what you do on a farm so [3:17] you learn how to do things that you're [3:19] told to do we need this project done we [3:21] need to plow that field [3:23] we need to cut the hay we need to bale [3:26] the hay we need to bring it into the [3:28] farm [3:28] we need to milk the cows in the morning [3:30] in the evening and all these things you [3:32] were [3:33] doing and you were expected to do so [3:35] hard work was what i knew [3:37] and i enjoyed that i enjoyed being [3:39] outdoors [3:40] so for me to think that i was going to [3:42] be in an office environment [3:44] that's nothing i ever thought i would do [3:47] so maybe [3:47] when i was 18 and the guidance counselor [3:50] said [3:51] well you've prepared yourself to go to [3:53] college i'm thinking [3:55] this is a mistake because i wanted to [3:57] get out of class [3:59] i didn't like english didn't like [4:01] history didn't like social studies [4:04] i just liked math and science and [4:06] because you could get real answers [4:08] somebody asked me what did this poem [4:10] mean [4:11] i go well she ask poet i [4:15] mean really i mean what did i get from [4:18] it that [4:19] wasn't what i remembered the question to [4:20] be so [4:22] to me going to college was not [4:25] expected none of my family ever went to [4:28] college [4:29] so you found yourself studying [4:31] engineering yes and i think i [4:33] studied engineering because my dad [4:36] had engineering magazines maybe ieee [4:39] magazine well i don't know if i triple e [4:41] was around maybe [4:42] oh it was it was around but um some of [4:45] these magazines like spectrum [4:47] started 50 years ago and this was well [4:49] maybe that was something [4:51] but what i'm getting at here is he had [4:52] some electronic magazines [4:54] and also he equipped the farm [4:58] with a generator that when the [4:59] philadelphia electric company power went [5:01] out [5:02] we need to keep the milk cold so then he [5:04] had a big [5:06] circuit breaker from a ship i think and [5:08] he installed that and [5:10] then started the tractor and started the [5:11] generator so to keep the milk [5:13] cold so that's electronics so i suppose [5:16] i got that from my dad [5:19] do you remember what classes interested [5:21] you most [5:23] in college in electronics in engineering [5:26] ah no well temple [5:29] temple was engineering technology so [5:32] it's more like [5:33] learning how to use equipment technology [5:36] not the [5:37] theory in the physics and so therefore [5:41] the classes that i took were just to get [5:43] my degree get out [5:44] get a job as a technician thinking i'd [5:47] be able to make more money [5:48] as a technician than as a laborer so i [5:52] was [5:52] rudely awakened when i'm working for [5:56] hinkles and mccoy making about 150 [5:58] dollars [5:58] a week with overtime and then [6:02] working for 85 dollars a week [6:05] it didn't make sense after i got my [6:07] degree so i needed to make some changes [6:10] and [6:12] i decided to be an engineer to pay my [6:14] mom back [6:16] so what was your first job after college [6:20] okay it was i worked for and i very [6:22] seldom tell people this but for three [6:24] months [6:24] i worked for a company called polyphase [6:27] in bridgeport which is [6:28] across the susquehanna susquehanna the [6:31] schuylkill river from [6:33] norristown and it was an old [6:36] manufacturing community and it was in an [6:39] old factory that this [6:40] polyphase was it was a depressing [6:44] situation for me that i didn't [6:48] start until it had been in the spring [6:51] of 1967 [6:55] and i first went into the army for [6:58] national guard [6:59] training and that's why i did an [7:02] interview right out of college so it was [7:04] after that that i got a recommendation [7:06] from a friend of mine that found a job [7:08] there [7:09] and he got a hundred dollars because i [7:11] took the job [7:14] so then i decided this wasn't for me [7:17] so i wanted i quit without another job [7:20] then i worked for filco ford and that's [7:22] where i was introduced to semiconductors [7:25] so tell us about that well at filco ford [7:28] now ford [7:29] bought filco and i think it was for the [7:32] electronics that going into automobiles [7:34] and then ford or i don't know if it was [7:38] ford or filco [7:40] acquired gme which was the first mos [7:44] manufacturer of semiconductor products [7:47] and in fact they had a 10 24 bit rom [7:51] back in this 60 probably 67 [7:55] something like that because there was a [7:59] jet engine controller that was built out [8:01] of these with eight [8:03] 10 24 bit roms and of course there had [8:06] been memory in there [8:07] i mean ram in there so that is where i [8:10] learned about [8:11] semiconductors and then i studied the [8:14] physical characteristics of [8:16] semiconductors for instance [8:18] you want to know the f tau of a [8:21] amplifier [8:22] and a frequency and then [8:26] the thermal coefficients of materials [8:29] so if you put a semiconductor a [8:31] regulator [8:32] solid state regulator on [8:35] a heat sink what's the thermal [8:38] coefficient from the surface [8:40] of the semiconductor to the actual [8:45] heat sink and so these kind of basic [8:47] characteristics [8:48] of semiconductors is what i worked on as [8:52] a technician [8:53] so then i i was interested in their [8:55] characteristics [8:57] i went to villanova night school took [8:59] four [9:00] different engineering classes to see if [9:03] i could [9:04] be an engineer and then i did well in [9:07] those [9:07] four courses then i wanted to transfer [9:10] my credits from temple [9:12] i had like 109 credits from temple [9:15] you need about 130 135 to be an engineer [9:19] thinking i could finish in one or two [9:22] years [9:22] they didn't accept my credits that's [9:25] when i [9:26] came to arizona because i had a [9:28] fraternity brother that came to arizona [9:31] and he went to asu and i went to the u [9:33] of a interestingly enough i didn't never [9:35] saw him again [9:36] but that's how i got into semiconductors [9:39] is through filco ford [9:41] and how did you get uh from there to [9:44] motorola well good question [9:49] at filco ford being in the radio [9:52] business [9:52] television business excuse me [9:56] motorola was a leader in those circuits [9:59] so filco ford was trying to fill figure [10:02] out or [10:03] filco was trying to figure out how [10:06] motorola was developing some of their [10:08] high voltage circuits [10:09] so the breakdown voltages and other [10:12] things the characteristics of [10:14] the circuitries in tvs and radios [10:18] is what filco was looking at so then i [10:21] knew who was the leader [10:24] because we wouldn't be trying to figure [10:26] out what [10:27] the follower was doing we're trying to [10:29] figure out what the leader's doing [10:30] so i knew then motorola was the leader [10:33] so i wanted to work for a leader [10:35] and so my whole goal was set on working [10:38] for motorola [10:39] after i got my engineering degree [10:43] so how did that happen well [10:46] that's an interesting another [10:47] interesting question it was kind of [10:49] bizarre actually [10:51] uh in my senior year so i took it took [10:54] me two years [10:55] to get my engineering degree at the [10:56] university of arizona a very good school [10:59] back in those days [11:00] the professors were writing the [11:02] textbooks [11:04] and actually i took a course and it [11:06] could have been one of his [11:08] first courses or an early course because [11:10] temple [11:11] at temple university of arizona [11:13] professor [11:14] started systems engineering i didn't [11:16] know that until recently [11:18] but i took a course from him and i did [11:19] very well in that course [11:21] so what happens was is when you have [11:25] businesses coming to interview the [11:27] students it was clearly stated [11:29] that if you're not graduating you if [11:31] you're graduating in the spring you [11:33] interview in the spring [11:34] so if you graduate in the fall you [11:37] interview in the fall [11:39] well for whatever reason i really wanted [11:41] to get interviewed at motorola so [11:44] i went to the fall interviews and found [11:47] that there was nobody signed up [11:49] and motorola was looking for someone [11:51] with over a 3.3 [11:53] grade point average and so i'm thinking [11:56] hey there's nobody signed up [11:57] i'll sign up because i have a 3.3 grade [12:02] so the head of uh [12:05] college recruiting came his name was [12:07] jerry fulton [12:08] and jury interviewed me and we had a [12:10] wonderful conversation [12:12] and as it turned out jack hennison [12:15] jack kenoshan yeah jack hennison was [12:19] a manager from filco [12:22] that went to no i'm sorry it wasn't jack [12:25] henderson it was another name right now [12:28] i can't think of his name he was at [12:30] filco ford he was like [12:32] two levels above my boss at philco ford [12:36] he was at motorola so i had something in [12:39] common [12:40] there was somebody i knew i almost had [12:43] his name [12:44] so what happened was i'm talking to [12:46] jerry fulton and jerry and i get along [12:49] really good [12:50] he says we got a job for you partner [12:52] because i had two years [12:53] experience and and so i had this [12:56] engineering technology background [12:58] and an engineering degree so he was they [13:00] were looking for people with [13:02] experience like that so when the spring [13:06] semester came i didn't do very well in [13:08] that interview [13:09] and i found out later why but [13:12] i don't need to get into that right now [13:14] it just didn't work and i left in the [13:16] middle of the interview [13:17] thinking i already talked to the boss [13:21] and so that spring when you get your [13:24] responses back i got [13:28] an employment offer from martin marietta [13:30] in denver [13:32] i promptly put it back in the mail [13:34] thanks but no thanks [13:36] got one from ncr in [13:40] california working for a computer [13:43] company [13:44] both of them were computer i promptly [13:46] put that in the mail thanks but no [13:48] thanks [13:48] waiting for the motorola motorola gets [13:51] the letter [13:52] signed by jerry fulton said thanks for [13:54] interviewing [13:55] but sorry we don't have a position for [13:58] you [14:00] i want to jump in the mailbox to get [14:02] back those other letters [14:04] so instead i call jury and say hey jerry [14:09] this is bill at the university of [14:10] arizona he goes [14:12] right i said well i got this [14:16] turn down letter and i thought you [14:18] wanted to hire me [14:20] oh bill there's a mistake throw that [14:21] away i said jury [14:23] you signed it he said that's a mistake [14:27] throw it away there's another letter [14:28] coming that's how i got the job [14:31] so what was what was the job that you [14:33] were hired to do [14:34] at motorola well presumably what [14:37] interested them when they interviewed [14:38] well you know motorola is an awesome [14:41] company [14:42] it was an awesome company it's kind of [14:44] fractured right now [14:46] but motorola had a training program and [14:49] you spent three months in four different [14:51] areas of the company [14:52] on that training program you were [14:55] treated like royalty [14:56] everybody wanted to train any working [14:58] firm the reason why [15:00] is the training department paid your [15:02] salary so your free labor [15:04] for the department that you're working [15:06] for so i thought about [15:07] i thought well why don't i learn [15:09] motorola so my first one [15:11] first three month they called them [15:13] rotations whereas [15:15] in the applications department part of [15:18] marketing [15:19] so i worked on the modem 6860 modem [15:23] working with a consultant i think his [15:25] name was [15:27] either anderson or jacobson there was [15:28] anderson jacobson [15:30] was the name of the modem manufacturer [15:32] at the time well they [15:33] they wanted to do an integrated circuit [15:35] low speed 300 baud [15:37] and so i got to flowchart that and [15:40] look at some of the circuits that were [15:42] needed to make the modem [15:44] what it needed to be so then the next [15:47] three months i spent in the design group [15:50] designing [15:51] what i specified in the first one then i [15:54] wanted to get into [15:56] mos processing because i wanted mos [15:58] because i knew [16:00] mos was the future and how how did you [16:02] know that [16:03] again it was about some basic [16:06] characteristics that i learned at the [16:08] university of arizona [16:09] and saw at filco ford that the bipolar [16:13] process was slower switching if you [16:17] go to the uh the highest the highest [16:20] performing circuits were going to be [16:22] voltage control which is the fet and so [16:25] therefore the analog [16:28] or the bipolar was current controlled so [16:32] it's slower but at the time it was the [16:35] fastest but you knew in the future it [16:36] was going to switch from [16:38] bipolar to mos field effect transistors [16:41] so what happens is i know that i want to [16:44] be in mls [16:45] i knew that was the future i was working [16:48] for a leader in the business [16:49] i wanted to be in process design next so [16:52] then i would manufacture [16:53] what i designed so to speak not really [16:55] but that's the idea [16:57] and so that wasn't available to me there [17:00] wasn't a [17:00] mos spot available as a trainee [17:04] so i worked for a bipolar part [17:07] of the motorola that was doing emitter [17:11] coupled logic which was the fastest [17:13] switching circuits in the world at the [17:15] time [17:16] and so that ecl motorola called a mekel [17:19] motorola eco and so i designed a triple [17:22] diffused [17:23] we called it mecklen which was the end [17:25] of the line so to speak [17:27] and that was i was diffusing into a [17:31] a bulk background the collector the next [17:35] was the base and then the emitter [17:37] and that was really hard to do nobody [17:39] had done it before [17:40] so i decided i'm going to i'm going to [17:42] create [17:43] a program model so i could change the [17:45] times and temperatures [17:47] and then i would be able to see the [17:49] diffusion of the ions into the [17:51] background and [17:52] into the collector by the base and then [17:54] the emitter into the base [17:56] so if if you punch through the emitter [17:59] through the base you don't [18:00] you've got a diode or you've got a short [18:02] really [18:03] because they're same type of material so [18:05] that's what i did [18:06] and so then i could get all the design [18:08] characteristics with five different [18:10] programs [18:11] that i wrote and there was a guy named [18:13] jim dunkley [18:15] that had a cookbook for bipolar [18:17] processing [18:18] so what i did was automated his book [18:20] cookbook [18:21] so when i got the next rotation was [18:24] marketing so then i wanted to see how [18:26] you sell these things [18:28] and so i worked on data sheets and then [18:30] there was a quote needed for [18:32] ibm for various size memories and [18:36] various volumes of memories so it's a [18:38] learning curve [18:39] over like a seven year period like [18:42] seven different oh i remember seven [18:44] seven sevens like seven different [18:47] uh volumes seven different years [18:50] and uh seven different densities and so [18:53] it was like seven pages of numbers [18:55] so i didn't think the secretary would [18:58] type up the numbers very accurately [19:00] so i decided i would write a 4k program [19:03] and all i did it was a spreadsheet [19:04] without [19:05] you know so you plug in the numbers then [19:07] you print it out it was a fortran [19:08] program [19:09] on a silent 700 which is a terminal at [19:12] the time [19:13] and then i copied on it yeah [19:16] so it was i i copied it on regular paper [19:19] so [19:19] because that that rolled thermal paper [19:22] wasn't [19:22] fun to handle so then i did that within [19:25] a couple of days and [19:27] then on to the next project but [19:29] marketing is how [19:31] i was forced by the marketing people [19:33] into [19:34] the logic group because there wasn't an [19:37] opening for me [19:38] in the microprocessor group which i [19:40] wanted to be in [19:42] well so why why did you want to be in [19:44] the microprocessor group [19:46] you got to motorola you worked on uh [19:50] designing the the modem chip you worked [19:53] on [19:53] the processing uh from the bipolar chips [19:57] how did you decide that microprocessors [19:59] were where you wanted to be [20:01] it wasn't really microprocessors at the [20:03] time i was focusing on [20:06] the fact that i loved the design [20:08] characteristics of mls [20:10] but as it turns out i [20:14] got four offers in every department that [20:17] i worked in [20:17] they gave me an offer the fourth one [20:21] the fifth one actually i'm sorry would [20:23] be got five offers [20:25] the fifth one came from the high voltage [20:28] bipolar [20:30] organization that had had the [20:33] tv circuits they wanted me because i [20:36] could model [20:37] the junctions and so we could figure out [20:39] what the breakdown voltages were [20:42] which was very important characteristic [20:44] the reason why i didn't take the job [20:46] is because when i was told by jury hey [20:50] bill you you need to get off your an [20:51] extra month on this and we need to [20:54] you need to pick and so i needed to pick [20:56] well i wanted to work for the bipolar [20:58] group [21:00] i sent them a letter never got a [21:02] response this was when you have [21:04] inter-office memos sent around we didn't [21:06] have email [21:07] and so what happens is i never got a [21:10] response and so then [21:12] the marketing group the mos marketing [21:14] group said [21:15] we haven't really gotten circuits to [21:17] work out of that mos logic group [21:20] so we want you to work there so they're [21:22] the ones that said [21:23] you need to take bill well meanwhile [21:26] i never got a response from the bipolar [21:29] group so [21:30] then after i'm working for a week i get [21:33] this call from the the head of the [21:34] bipolar group that wanted me to [21:36] work there he says bill where are you i [21:38] said in the logic group [21:40] oh he says well we want you to work here [21:43] we told you that [21:44] i said yeah but you didn't respond to my [21:46] my letter [21:47] email my letter my memo and i thought [21:50] because you didn't respond [21:51] you didn't want me so that's why i'm in [21:54] the logic group now i made a commitment [21:55] i'm [21:56] here he said bill did you see the tv the [21:59] you know last week or the week before [22:01] when that tornado sit down in north [22:03] scottsdale [22:04] well maybe he said that was my house [22:08] i was putting my house back together [22:10] that's why i didn't respond to you [22:13] and i'm thinking a tornado changed my [22:16] path [22:19] so what did you do i worked in the logic [22:22] group and [22:23] and then what i did there was something [22:25] that another one of these opportunities [22:28] there was nobody wanted to design just [22:31] logic gates [22:34] there's a motorola had a local [22:37] logic i called it loco logic [22:40] in boston for some of the computer [22:43] companies and so [22:44] you could design your own custom circuit [22:47] with standard cell library [22:49] so it was my job to take that i took [22:52] over from somebody else that [22:53] probably didn't really want to do it [22:54] because it wasn't that much fun but you [22:56] had to put in the capacitances [22:58] on the inputs and the outputs you have [23:00] to have the drive [23:02] capability and the performance it was in [23:04] a if you remember the old logic [23:06] libraries that had their [23:07] various characteristics that you had to [23:09] have in the [23:10] in a sheet that described the [23:13] performance of the various logic gates [23:15] so i designed the local logic library [23:19] for pmos metalgate pmos silicon gate [23:23] cmos metal gate cmos silicon gate nmos [23:26] metal gate and moss silicon gate [23:28] so i learned all the processes so it was [23:31] kind of like [23:32] wow this is now i know how it all works [23:35] so then because i did that then they [23:38] wanted me to design the process control [23:40] monitor [23:41] that monitored all of the well the [23:44] wafers for the memory products and for [23:46] the microprocessor products that ran on [23:48] the [23:49] nmos enhancement load process [23:52] that we designed our chips on so then i [23:55] designed the process control monitor [23:57] that was stepped into [23:59] the wafer in like five different [24:00] locations then you probe that [24:03] to get to know whether the process was [24:05] in spec or not [24:07] so then i designed that then i was [24:10] asked to join the microprocessor design [24:12] group and that's why [24:14] you know i worked on that but then all [24:17] the engineers were working on that [24:19] and then they needed somebody to do the [24:21] peripheral interface adapter [24:23] so i was pulled off the microprocessor [24:25] to design the peripheral interface [24:27] adapter [24:28] which connected the microprocessing [24:30] element the memory elements [24:32] to the real world driving solenoids [24:35] driving just external switch or [24:39] reading external switches and the pia [24:42] was used also for a keyboard interface [24:46] so that you could drive some of the with [24:49] some of the pins you drive the rows and [24:51] then you sense which key is depressed [24:53] so i got a wonderful introduction to the [24:56] whole system by doing that [24:57] peripheral interface adapter so on the [25:00] pia what [25:01] what what did you do how did that [25:03] project start and [25:05] what were your contributions to it and [25:07] take us through the [25:08] okay so at motorola they had a like that [25:12] applications department they specify [25:14] things so marketing [25:15] specified what they thought the industry [25:18] wanted [25:19] and so as a result then you would take [25:22] that spec that was created [25:24] in combination with the design group but [25:27] mostly [25:28] dominated by the marketing group so [25:31] in some cases that's a good thing some [25:33] cases a bad thing the 6800 [25:35] microprocessor [25:37] was thrown together by a lot of [25:40] contributors so therefore the design [25:42] group didn't really have much to say [25:44] about what went into it [25:45] and if a sales guy came back and said [25:48] hey we need this instruction so they [25:49] added another instruction whether [25:51] whatever so it was kind of a random [25:53] thing but it was built on the [25:55] specification of the pdp-8 [25:57] the 6800 the 6502 came later [26:00] was pdp-11 better architecture [26:04] and now going back to my contribution on [26:06] the pia [26:07] i was somebody picked the numbers i [26:10] didn't pick the numbers they said it was [26:11] supposed to be 135 mills [26:14] by 135 mills [26:17] so that was my challenge so then [26:20] i think and what was the feature size [26:23] it was 0.8 micron 800 nanometers [26:29] so it was 0.8 mi that means 4 10 of a [26:31] micro i mean [26:32] 0.4 mils [26:36] 0.4 mil uh i got the number system right [26:40] the line with metal line width was 0.4 [26:43] the spacing was 0.4 [26:45] so it was 0.8 mil centers [26:48] so that was large compared to the future [26:51] where we are now [26:53] so we knew what those characteristics [26:55] are [26:56] and so how they came up with 135 by 135 [26:59] i don't know maybe that was the cavity [27:02] or well [27:02] something i think sales said we needed [27:04] that to make money [27:06] and so no it wasn't the cavity because [27:09] the same [27:09] package accepted to 217 [27:13] by 210 mil 6800. [27:16] so you got the you got the outline of [27:18] the die the size of the [27:19] size of the die and then basically [27:23] did they give you a pin out i don't know [27:26] if i was given a pin out or i chose the [27:28] pin out right now [27:29] but when you design a chip you know on [27:32] one side is the data bus [27:34] because you're going to latch into [27:35] information from the microprocessor [27:37] then you're going to have io so across [27:40] the chip you have a data path [27:42] that data path kind of tells you where [27:44] you want to put things [27:46] so i don't know if i actually defined [27:47] the pin out i could have [27:49] because i knew i wanted the flexibility [27:52] to [27:53] define where things were actually maybe [27:56] i did do the pin out because i got a [27:58] patent on it [27:59] it was the first patent for the layout [28:02] of an ic [28:03] and other lawyers have called me from [28:05] time to time not recently [28:07] but they say how did you get that patent [28:09] well my patent lawyer [28:11] charlie hoffman he put that together but [28:14] he thought it was worthy of a patent [28:16] and so i got a patent the patent is that [28:18] i placed things [28:20] that if you changed it it would be a [28:22] bigger chip i convinced the patent [28:24] office [28:24] that it was unique and if anybody copied [28:27] it they were violating our patent [28:29] so you know a patent is [28:33] was created patent office was created in [28:37] uh in 1800 while 1800 is when thomas [28:40] jefferson was president [28:41] he was the first head of the patent [28:44] office [28:45] and i do have a patent the very first [28:47] patent is on potash [28:49] but in my office charlie gave me that [28:51] you know copy [28:52] but he made it look real so going back [28:56] to that [28:57] is what a patent is about it's about [29:00] teaching someone what you know [29:04] and what you've invented so you get the [29:07] monopoly that's the word that's on the [29:09] patent you get a monopoly if you're [29:11] willing to teach someone [29:13] so i was teaching them how to do a [29:15] peripheral interface adapter and [29:17] so i got a patent on it so so that [29:20] device [29:21] i chose every transistor on there i [29:24] taught the mass designer [29:25] how to design integrated circuits [29:28] and when he said he couldn't do this one [29:32] part [29:33] i stayed up after a party i stayed up on [29:36] a friday night and finished the chip [29:38] and so but he had an un he didn't have [29:41] the advantage of knowing [29:43] what he could do with the actual [29:45] transistors and the resistors and [29:47] to make it work so i figured it out and [29:50] i took it in on monday and [29:51] say i think we're done with the chip now [29:53] we just need to check it [29:55] so what tools did you use to design this [29:59] okay so back in those days there was no [30:02] lvs no layout versus schematic [30:04] so you had to check those things and it [30:07] was with ruby lift [30:08] so you actually had a flat bed with a [30:11] knife on it [30:12] and cut it out and then somebody had to [30:13] peel off the [30:16] the ruby lift from the places where you [30:17] wanted light to shine through [30:19] so those patterns were driven by a kalma [30:23] was the original camel one system could [30:26] drive a plotter [30:28] or it could drive a ruby lift cutter [30:31] on a flatbed so the simulation of it i [30:35] was [30:36] one that liked computers so i was given [30:40] by a friend of my aunt back when i was [30:42] at temple [30:43] he was an ibm supervisor and when my [30:46] aunt my father had passed away [30:48] and so my aunt said maybe this friend of [30:51] mine [30:52] george rogers was his name maybe he [30:55] knows what you could do after you [30:56] graduate from temple [30:58] and his one comment that i don't [31:00] remember anything else i don't remember [31:02] a hello or goodbye or anything [31:04] get into computers so that's why [31:07] every chance i got i used a computer [31:10] because [31:10] i had one piece of advice get into [31:13] computers [31:14] so that's what i did so that means that [31:16] when i'm designing an integrated circuit [31:18] i want to use simulation because i knew [31:20] the computer could help me figure out [31:21] whether it was going to work or not [31:23] so i had to prove out that the [31:26] the pc control or the wafer the process [31:29] control monitor matched up with the [31:32] actual characteristics in the simulation [31:34] program [31:35] so i knew whether that was accurate or [31:37] not we had to make some changes to the [31:39] model because of things i found [31:41] and i found that narrow transistors had [31:44] a higher voltage [31:45] threshold than a short one and these are [31:48] things that the memory product [31:50] guys didn't use and so they had to [31:52] change their design because of what i [31:54] found on the process control monitor i [31:56] put very large narrow transistors very [31:59] wide transistors very large transistors [32:01] and very short transition [32:02] so i knew the characteristics and what [32:04] the actual sizing might have an effect [32:07] on [32:08] so i did that then i matched it up so [32:10] then i simulated everything so i [32:12] simulated everything [32:13] i knew it was going to work what [32:15] software did you use to do this [32:16] simulation [32:17] motorola there was an engineer there his [32:20] name was frank jenkins [32:22] he i think graduated from stanford [32:26] but i'm not sure if it's stanford or [32:27] berkeley one of those two [32:30] and so frank wrote a program called [32:33] time t-i-m-e stood for transient [32:37] something integrated whatever [32:39] microelectronics or something like that [32:41] circuit analysis so when he went to [32:43] motorola from [32:44] stanford or berkeley he wrote m [32:47] time so he just put the m in front of it [32:50] and so that [32:50] m time frank and i became friends i was [32:53] taking the data in the lab [32:55] he was writing the software then i tell [32:57] him when the model had to change we only [32:59] had like [33:00] less than 10 character characteristics [33:03] that we plugged into that model [33:05] it was very empirical so i got to know [33:08] everything about [33:09] the transistors and what worked what [33:11] didn't work [33:13] how complex was this chip how many [33:16] transistors [33:17] or gates was in that i'd say a thousand [33:19] to 1500 not that many [33:22] it's we still supply it by the way we're [33:25] still getting orders [33:26] for compatible version with the original [33:29] design and how many i o [33:33] lines did okay it had 20 i o lines it [33:36] had [33:36] eight individually programmable [33:40] bits of ports on one right so when you [33:44] write with an 8-bit processor you store [33:47] your accumulator into a register you [33:50] we had bi-directional controls so we had [33:53] a data direction register [33:54] and a data register and that's intel [33:58] i don't think ever had that so we [34:00] actually were selling [34:01] pias with 80 80 80 80 processors from [34:04] intel [34:05] because no they never they had eight [34:07] bits out eight bits in but not [34:09] individually selectable so that really [34:11] benefits if you only have [34:13] a couple of bits but you have more [34:15] outputs or inputs or whatever [34:17] so you can mix and match ncr [34:20] bought i don't know they were a big [34:23] purchaser of pias [34:26] motorola would force them to buy a 6800 [34:28] they were buying intel processors [34:30] but buying my pa pias so intel marketing [34:34] thought hey for every 10 pias you got to [34:37] buy one microprocessor so i don't know [34:38] what they did with the microprocessor [34:40] the 6800s but [34:41] i think they tried to find a home for [34:43] them sell them or something [34:44] but they used my pa with the intel [34:47] processor [34:48] so the other two so there's two [34:50] handshake pins [34:51] on a port so the handshake [34:54] on two different ports so now we have [34:56] two 8-bit ports that would be 16 pins [34:59] then two handshake pins per port so when [35:02] you wrote [35:02] to the output let's say when you wrote [35:05] to the output [35:06] you wanted to tell the rest of the world [35:08] i wrote to the app [35:09] to the output buffer now you it's your [35:11] turn to take it so it's handshaking [35:13] and so then when that peripheral took [35:16] the value of the pins [35:18] it would tell you that it read the pin [35:20] so then you can go back and forth [35:22] it's an interrupt ribbon or polling you [35:25] could see [35:26] that this transfer had occurred [35:29] so that's basically a pia the other side [35:31] of it is the interface to the [35:32] microprocessor [35:34] eight data pins and register addressing [35:38] and then you have read write and phase [35:40] two and [35:41] power supply that's that's the 40 pin [35:43] part [35:44] what other chips did you do at motorola [35:49] well my patents i designed the buffers [35:51] that were used on all of the parts [35:53] so [35:56] i o buffers i o buffers they're you know [35:59] clock generators i i designed all the [36:01] clock generators [36:03] and so uh the individual circuits [36:06] because of my work with the standard [36:08] cell library i knew how to pick the [36:10] transistor sizing [36:12] because you look at the loading that [36:14] you're going to have on a data path or a [36:16] wire [36:17] you know what the calcul you can [36:18] calculate the capacitive loading if [36:20] there's resistance in it you could put [36:22] that in the model [36:23] simulating it so all of that i knew and [36:25] that's what i [36:26] so all of all of the chips at motorola [36:29] used [36:29] some of my circuits so you were kind of [36:32] the analog guy in the digital [36:34] group and you understood the [36:37] dynamic uh issues with the yes [36:40] yeah in fact that you know later much [36:43] later when i start after i started my [36:45] company [36:46] to survive i taught xerox how to design [36:50] microprocessors and that was a big part [36:52] of what they [36:53] were missing they didn't know how to [36:55] really put a [36:56] microprocessor together i showed them [36:58] how to do that because you have to use [37:00] some basic [37:01] physics you just what capacitive loading [37:04] do you have on it [37:06] and if you don't know what the [37:06] capacitive loading is you don't know [37:08] what transistor sizes will [37:10] be required to switch in a certain time [37:12] frame [37:14] so yeah i knew i knew that the [37:16] characteristics of the transistors [37:18] so after the pia what did you do next [37:22] well my next chip was to design a [37:25] peripheral [37:26] i mean a programmable timer unit but it [37:28] was in the middle of that [37:30] that chuck came a calling and say bill [37:34] do you really want to go to austin texas [37:37] no i don't really want to go to texas [37:41] uh so he says hey how about if we [37:44] we get a group together and we design [37:46] the microprocessor we really want to do [37:48] and you know that the 6800 isn't the [37:52] right one [37:52] it's too big right chuck i know it's too [37:55] big [37:56] so chuck said who do we need to be [37:58] successful [38:00] who who can we take out a motorola [38:03] to be successful i'm going to look for [38:05] some place that we can land [38:07] and we'll design the microprocessor and [38:10] that's what started my thinking motorola [38:14] isn't going to be the place i'm going to [38:15] retire at but [38:17] another thing happened at motorola [38:21] i made a bet with the operations manager [38:25] of the mos group otis [38:28] wilkins otis ended up at gte [38:32] heading up their semiconductor [38:33] operations later but otis [38:36] said was it otis maybe have the wrong [38:40] guy [38:40] but anyhow he's at we had a party for [38:44] releasing the [38:45] microprocessor and the pia at the same [38:47] time [38:48] and so to manufacturing get the samples [38:52] first and so what i said [38:56] i'll bet now this is after a glass of [38:57] wine or two or three at a favorite [39:00] restaurant [39:02] everybody's celebrating i'm saying my [39:04] chip will work the first time [39:07] and he says that's an easy bet [39:10] no chip has ever worked the first time [39:13] so what's the bet i said [39:15] how about dinner what do you think you [39:19] and your wife [39:20] me and my wife dinner he said okay [39:23] where i said well for me the wharf in [39:26] san francisco [39:28] we're in phoenix he says well i know a [39:32] restaurant in scottsdale [39:34] with a hundred dollar bottle of wine i [39:36] go okay [39:38] you're on my chip came out worked well [39:42] why did it work [39:43] we didn't have lvs what i did was i [39:46] checked it [39:46] five times you make a bet you better [39:49] back it up [39:50] i wasn't wanting to buy him a bottle 100 [39:53] bottle of wine anyway well he never paid [39:55] off [39:56] so when somebody doesn't pay off then [39:58] you go is this the right place for me [40:00] and then another thing was said to me [40:04] in a meeting with ami which was our [40:06] second source [40:07] they said if bill's chip works the first [40:09] time [40:10] we're going to give him the first [40:13] engineering [40:14] bonus whoa [40:17] and john buganon he's passed away now [40:20] john like what what about me he was the [40:23] guy [40:24] that was in charge of the project leader [40:26] of the 6800 in this meeting [40:28] so he wasn't happy with that because he [40:30] thought probably that he deserves a [40:32] bonus just because he [40:33] held the team together to get the chop [40:35] project done [40:37] chip came out worked the first time [40:40] never paid off on the opponent so at [40:43] that point you were [40:44] skeptical about how successful the 6800 [40:48] was going to be [40:48] no no i thought that would be successful [40:51] no it was it was the fact that i needed [40:53] to leave [40:54] because not one but two promises were [40:57] broken [40:59] that was powerful okay so who do you [41:01] think i meet in the hall at 52nd street [41:04] jerry fulton bill i thought i heard [41:06] you're leaving [41:07] i said yeah jerry [41:12] i've got to go [41:15] so then what happened went to mos [41:18] technology [41:19] so now i'm [41:22] fueled by we need to make this [41:24] successful [41:26] so what was mos technology like when you [41:29] showed up oh my god that's a good [41:32] question [41:35] it was run by calculator people out of [41:37] texas instruments [41:38] and so the operations guy i forget what [41:41] his name was but he was [41:43] a very successful texas instruments [41:47] production manager so he was like vice [41:49] president of production [41:52] and the people that were designing the [41:53] calculator chips they were pmos [41:56] metal gate that's what i think ti had at [41:59] the time and so [42:01] they were very successful in the [42:03] calculator business and in fact the [42:05] oh almost had his name his first name [42:08] was don [42:09] but he came up with a thing called spot [42:12] knocking the masks [42:14] so they had perfect math but nobody else [42:16] had perfect math [42:18] so they had a great manufacturing team [42:23] from a ti background and [42:27] had a great logic team designing [42:29] calculators that were really significant [42:31] they're scientific and everything so [42:33] they knew what they were doing [42:34] so don mclaughlin was the vice president [42:37] of engineering he was one of the [42:38] founders [42:39] so what happened when we got there they [42:41] didn't want us there [42:43] they're saying what how could john paven [42:46] and the [42:47] founding president how could he hire [42:49] this group out of the west [42:50] they don't know what they're doing and [42:52] we know what we can do why [42:54] why aren't we doing it so they weren't [42:56] happy that [42:57] john paven brought in a team to do [43:01] a microprocessor now the actual 65 [43:04] where'd that come from i guess [43:06] it's lower number than 68. [43:09] i don't know where the 65 came from uh [43:12] and then of course you start at zero [43:14] zero and then zero one zero two like [43:16] that but [43:17] zero zero isn't too interesting so the [43:19] first microprocessor is 6501 [43:22] and how big was the team that that came [43:24] over with you [43:25] eight of us and then we hired one [43:30] i think we hired one back there so we [43:32] had two mass designers [43:36] we hired one mass designer so we had [43:38] three mass designers on the project [43:40] uh harry bockham and and uh [43:45] mike james j-a-n-e-s i think [43:49] uh and then terry holt was the [43:50] operations guy and then we had chuck [43:52] petals the marketing [43:54] and he was the ring leader he was the [43:57] he was the business guy he was the guy [43:58] that said if we do this [44:00] we can we can create a good business [44:03] opportunity [44:04] uh so chuck was the marketing guy and he [44:07] kind of controlled [44:08] the opportunity so to speak he put [44:11] together the [44:12] the package for mos to the contract [44:17] and so then there's myself ray hurt [44:20] uh and then how how many do i have there [44:25] sid hope was one that we hired that was [44:27] back there so there's a picture in [44:29] e times of the group that designed the [44:32] microprocessor in the product so did [44:35] they have an nmos process when you [44:37] when you joined no so we had to bring up [44:40] an nmos process [44:41] which going back to motorola days which [44:44] was another reason why [44:46] i left motorola is when you want to make [44:50] a difference [44:51] and somebody stands in your way for no [44:54] apparent reason [44:56] you kind of say what's going on here [44:58] it's confusing [44:59] so what happened was because i had to [45:01] process control model [45:03] monitor responsibility i decided [45:07] that i would have aligned with the same [45:10] lattice structure and everything if you [45:12] know a little bit about the physics of [45:13] the lattice [45:14] the mobility can change depending on [45:16] which way it's oriented [45:17] subtly and so i had depletion load [45:21] process and enhancement load process [45:24] on the same process control monitor so [45:27] all you had to do is [45:29] use the depletion mask so that you could [45:31] implant [45:32] for the depletion thresholds for the [45:34] load devices [45:35] it was much faster process much easier [45:38] process [45:39] less transistors it was the way to go [45:42] well chuck saw what i was doing so when [45:45] we went to mos technology [45:47] we specified what we wanted it's what i [45:49] wanted at motorola [45:50] which motorola didn't want to do how [45:52] many masks was was that process oh [45:55] it wasn't very many seven or eight [45:57] something like that wasn't very many and [45:59] what was the [46:00] wafer size at that point [46:03] well the first wafers that i worked on [46:04] at motorola they were like [46:06] two and a half inch wafers but i think [46:08] we probably were three [46:10] i don't know if they had three and a [46:11] half but i don't think they were four [46:13] inch wafers [46:14] but what ed armstrong the process guy [46:18] that was the head of process at motorola [46:20] for the nmos process at motorola [46:22] he grew a long beard waiting for 10 [46:26] good die per wafer and we were getting [46:29] like 100 could die [46:30] per way from the 65.2 we had at least 10 [46:33] times the yield per wafer so we had [46:36] and it was because of their spot [46:37] knocking and [46:39] what is the spot knocking well when you [46:42] build a [46:43] mask you have flaws sometimes in the [46:46] material that's used [46:47] are these contact masks at this point [46:49] well no that's another thing [46:51] the contact mask means that you would [46:53] wear out your mask [46:54] after used a few times so these were [46:57] projection [46:58] okay or proximity so is proximity if i [47:01] got it right [47:02] and that means it didn't touch the [47:04] weight so if you got a good [47:05] mass you had a good mass that you could [47:08] use for hundreds of wafers as long [47:10] as you didn't damage them so [47:13] the spot knocking meant that if you [47:15] compared two you're not going to have a [47:16] hole [47:18] in the same place on both mats so then [47:21] if you went in and [47:22] put a little ink or something that [47:24] covered the hole up [47:25] you could create a perfect mask that's [47:28] what we had [47:29] so you retouched the mask yeah yeah [47:31] motorola wasn't doing that [47:33] so we had advantages in manufacturing so [47:36] when we sold [47:37] a 20 6501 [47:40] and a 25 6502 [47:44] we were making money so your [47:47] your team went to mos to build a [47:50] microprocessor [47:51] who came up with the architecture of the [47:54] processor [47:55] well it would be chuck i would say [47:59] i'm a semiconductor engineer so [48:03] i'm building what chuck once built [48:08] when i did step in and started [48:12] defining things is when i realized [48:15] there were some basic things here that [48:17] could make a big difference [48:19] motorola 6800 had a clock generator [48:24] that they sold for 69 on top of a 375.6 [48:29] microprocessor so if you add the two [48:31] together [48:32] you got over 400 dollars and so but [48:35] without any i o [48:36] even right so then [48:39] the idea here is that if you design the [48:43] clock generator and it's run [48:44] on one wafer and the microprocessor's on [48:48] a different wafer [48:49] than the characteristics between the [48:51] clock generator wafer and the [48:53] microprocessor wafer one could be fast [48:55] and one could be slow [48:56] so if you have a slow clock and a fast [48:58] microprocessor [49:00] it could have some race conditions that [49:02] would cause it to fail [49:04] so while chuck's off on a marketing [49:08] you know visit someplace [49:12] i'm talking to rod and i say hey ron [49:15] why don't we just build a clock [49:17] generator right into the 6501 [49:21] well why why do you want to do that i [49:24] said because [49:24] then you don't need a clock generator [49:26] chip just put a resistor and a capacitor [49:28] on it or a crystal and a [49:30] resistor on it and you're you're good to [49:31] go you don't have to worry about it [49:34] and so brad's saying well whatever [49:37] and so then chuck comes back i tell [49:40] chuck [49:40] hey this isn't going to cost you [49:42] anything he says well as long as it [49:43] doesn't cost anything [49:44] and you can put it in there i said it's [49:46] a metal option [49:48] if you want it you have it it's the same [49:50] chip 6501 6502 is exactly the same [49:53] except the metal layer you just connect [49:56] up the clock generator [49:58] the way it's designed so [50:01] rod has and i have a bet well rod [50:03] doesn't think the clock generator is [50:05] necessarily a good idea [50:07] because it differentiates it from the [50:09] pin out of the 6800 [50:11] so you go rod rod says [50:15] we're going to sell a ton more 6501s in [50:17] 6502 so we make a little friendly bet [50:20] while we're waiting for the die to come [50:21] out [50:22] and 6501 had the same pin out as the [50:25] 6800 yes [50:26] 6502 is different different and so you [50:29] you made a bet [50:30] as to the relative volume of the yeah [50:32] yeah i'm saying [50:34] i think technology wins over marketing [50:36] rod says [50:37] marketing wins over technology okay well [50:40] when [50:41] motorola sued us and then they required [50:43] as part of the settlement [50:46] to drop the 6501 i won the bet that day [50:51] well rod was probably not happy with me [50:55] whatever so we're friends always tell us [50:58] about that [50:59] suit what how when did you hear about [51:02] that [51:03] what what was your thinking what did you [51:05] decide to do how did you make the [51:07] decisions [51:08] well i never thought about being sued [51:13] by anybody but it doesn't mean that [51:17] you don't get sued but i didn't spend [51:19] any time thinking about that [51:21] i figured we were doing something [51:22] totally different [51:24] motorola didn't want to do depletion [51:26] load totally new process [51:28] totally knew everything totally new [51:30] instruction set [51:31] none of the op codes from the 6800 would [51:33] run on the 6502 [51:35] or 6501 and so therefore [51:38] what's their claim well as it turns out [51:41] they were claiming patent infringement [51:46] well yeah a 6520 chip is exactly the [51:50] same as a 68 [51:51] 20 chip yeah we violated your patent [51:56] oh okay but then they said they tried to [51:58] get us on trade secrets [52:00] then one of the parties one of the mass [52:04] designers [52:05] brought the schematics and you go oh [52:08] that's not good [52:09] and then under deposition and [52:13] these are revealed well this is not good [52:16] so but we didn't need the schematics [52:20] it wasn't the same there wasn't anything [52:22] the same all the circuits were different [52:24] because [52:24] the enhancement load process all the [52:26] critical performance [52:28] was on bootstrap bootstrap [52:31] circuits to get the high drive for the [52:33] power supply [52:34] and depletion load got those [52:36] automatically because of the depletion [52:38] load [52:38] so we didn't have any reason to have it [52:41] schematic [52:42] and so then this mass designer was [52:46] chuck may have mentioned that in his [52:47] interview i don't know but chuck always [52:49] had a problem with it [52:51] i won't mention who it was so what [52:53] happens is [52:54] when push got the shove then the [52:56] settlement was on patent violations and [52:58] the trade secret thing was given up and [53:01] so [53:02] uh that they they defined the terms and [53:07] it was to drop the 6501 [53:09] but the 6502 then was now [53:12] the only one so [53:15] i wanted to bet technology won out over [53:18] marketing [53:20] so the 6502 [53:23] uh onboard clock generator right [53:26] different pinout different uh [53:29] architecture [53:30] about more than an order of magnitude [53:33] less expensive right than the [53:35] 6800 right how was that at that point [53:39] going with your customer design in [53:43] process you know i wasn't involved with [53:46] that [53:46] chuck was so chuck would make the [53:48] customer visits and then will [53:50] mathis there were four inventors [53:53] listed for the one patent on the 6502 [53:58] the one patent is on decimal correct [54:01] motorola the 6800 i don't think had [54:03] decimal correct [54:04] that means that you set a bid in the [54:06] status and the [54:08] mode register which is the p register [54:12] you set a bit to define whether it's [54:14] binary math [54:15] or binary coded decimal math so that was [54:18] a big deal [54:19] for whatever reason i needed to write a [54:23] fortran [54:23] simulator of that so make sure that all [54:25] the combinations were [54:28] correct so actually i did that design [54:31] but because we all worked on it all four [54:33] of us [54:34] are on the pat chuck myself rod and will [54:37] mathis they're the four inventors [54:40] as for binary coded decimal feature of [54:42] the [54:43] microprocessor so i don't know did i [54:46] answer your question [54:48] did did folks customers that [54:51] use that bcd feature that you're aware [54:53] of [54:54] maybe building calculators around [54:56] actually [54:57] atari used it because they used it in [55:00] their [55:02] asteroids game and i found this out [55:05] because when i designed the cmos version [55:08] i had to do it with one more cycle so i [55:11] didn't use my patent [55:13] that one more cycle made the asteroids [55:15] break up [55:17] because they updated the score on the [55:20] retrace [55:21] on the screen retrace so because it took [55:24] an extra cycle it messed up there [55:27] the code was timed to the screen so now [55:31] going back to it the reason why mos [55:34] technology [55:36] basically couldn't make a go of it is [55:39] because [55:39] the microprocessor industry was very [55:43] young so where are you going to get the [55:45] volume then with center tech and [55:47] rockwell picking up the big orders in [55:50] california i'm always [55:52] going out of business that's what jack [55:54] trammell [55:55] saw he saw blood in the water [55:59] and he bought up i think six months or a [56:02] year's worth of calculators thinking [56:03] they're going to staff up [56:05] they were maybe 200 employees and then [56:07] what happened was [56:08] jack said i don't need any more [56:10] calculators chips [56:13] well they're gasping because the [56:15] microprocessor industry didn't build [56:18] at the speed at which chuck told them it [56:21] would [56:21] or indicated and so that's when jack [56:24] came along and [56:26] acquired mos technology and that [56:30] i was gone by then so the the revenue [56:34] um growth didn't happen to [56:37] fast enough to to keep mos technology in [56:40] business [56:42] jack came in and and acquired it [56:45] and when did you leave i left in [56:49] about march of 1977 [56:53] and so the microprocessor came out in [56:56] the summer of 1975 we [57:00] left and started dropped the pay we were [57:03] dropped [57:04] from the payroll of motorola on the 19th [57:06] of august [57:07] we were picked up on the payroll for [57:09] most technology the 19th [57:12] of august 1974. so [57:15] within a year we brought up a process [57:17] new processor [57:19] and marketing was started in september [57:23] of that 75 is when we we had a wonderful [57:27] reception at the moscone center [57:31] i remember that i remember that that was [57:33] awesome party [57:35] there were so many people wanted a chip [57:37] so many people [57:39] i remember i could only afford the [57:41] manuals so [57:42] is that right i got the manuals but not [57:44] the chip yeah there's a [57:46] a mason jar maybe about that tall of [57:49] chips in it [57:50] chuck chuck this is chuck this classic [57:52] chuck chuck is [57:54] the showman and so and rod and i were [57:57] there [57:58] and so we had a lot of beers we had was [58:00] in the saint francis hotel [58:02] we had beers and talked with people and [58:05] a lot of people interested in what we [58:06] created [58:08] so before you left mos who who had [58:11] designed the 6502 [58:13] in to systems [58:16] well i really don't know [58:24] i know apparently wozniak bought one of [58:29] the chips [58:30] various people bought the chips i would [58:34] work the floor [58:35] and you would take one of their cards [58:38] that they gave you [58:38] you swipe it and give them a data sheet [58:40] and this is what we did [58:42] for hours at a time you could look down [58:44] from the second floor and look down [58:46] here are all these people around our [58:48] little booth knocking over [58:50] a pinball and not a pinball what do you [58:52] call it a [58:53] pachinko machine or something like that [58:55] with little balls [58:57] and the p our neighbors were not happy [58:58] with us because they were getting [59:00] trampled trying to get a data sheet [59:02] so you know it was it was just the [59:05] funnest time an engineer could possibly [59:07] have [59:08] were people skeptical that you could [59:11] uh build and ship a microprocessor at a [59:14] tenth [59:15] or less than a tenth i surprised in [59:17] motorola did you have a lot of people [59:19] questioning you about that [59:21] well see again i'm i'm i'm a design [59:24] engineer at the time [59:25] so i don't see what's going on in the [59:27] market chuck sees what's going on the [59:29] market [59:30] and chuck had his way that [59:33] i think chuck could cause some people to [59:37] doubt [59:38] because he tends to uh [59:42] manipulate the information a little bit [59:45] where i'd say hey [59:46] this is the reason why we can do what [59:48] we're doing the process yields 10 times [59:50] as much [59:51] and we got the same size wafers and [59:54] here's what the cost could be and here's [59:56] what we're selling for we're making [59:57] money [59:58] and so if you have any question about it [60:00] hey we'll be happy to show you the [60:02] schematics or anything you need to [60:04] to see that we know what we're doing we [60:06] know what we're doing they're [60:07] very successful at building bigger chips [60:10] in the calculator market they were [60:11] selling [60:13] bigger chips than we were doing in the [60:15] calculator business [60:16] at a lower price so all the experiences [60:19] there [60:19] we know what we're doing the guy that's [60:21] running the operations is a guy from ti [60:23] ti knows what they're doing and we have [60:26] their best [60:27] people so if you had a question now what [60:31] chuck actually told him i don't know [60:33] but i wasn't in those meetings for the [60:35] most part i was back [60:36] designing chips i designed a via [60:40] without any computer assistance that via [60:43] is why [60:44] i knew i could start my own company i [60:46] would be making money off just not even [60:48] have to use a simulator by this time [60:50] i knew the transistor sizing see i knew [60:53] what it took [60:54] so i could design chips without a [60:56] computer so how did the via differ from [60:58] the pia [61:00] well what chuck i can still see the orb [61:02] arby's restaurant there in [61:05] in norristown and he comes back from one [61:09] of his meetings and say hey we need a [61:11] timer [61:12] we need a timer okay we need a serial [61:15] port [61:16] okay so what are you saying chuck well [61:19] let's go [61:20] go to lunch so on a napkin the old [61:22] classic [61:23] napkin lunch napkin you know there i am [61:26] saying okay you're going to have pia [61:28] plus a timer plus a serial port [61:31] wow that's more registers okay so [61:34] we're going to have to keep it to 16 [61:36] registers okay [61:38] because i need 16 i can do that and then [61:42] so so that's chuck and will and i have [61:45] lunch and they [61:46] say the application guy chuck okay [61:49] so then i go back to the mos and [61:52] now i have to design it so i designed it [61:54] and chuck says [61:55] no we have to have whatever more [61:57] compatibility so then i had to redesign [61:59] it [62:00] and so i designed it twice with a [62:02] different pin out [62:03] i don't know what the first one was but [62:06] but then i said what about the serial [62:07] port he says [62:08] just any serial port that serial port [62:11] was used as the mouse interface on the [62:13] original macintosh [62:16] and so it's a weird serial port it's [62:18] eight bits in eight bits out it's [62:20] synchronous [62:21] not asynchronous if i had to do all over [62:23] again i said chuck [62:24] we need a an a uart [62:28] plus a timer plus the i o pins and we [62:31] got a [62:31] really good product but that serial port [62:35] is being used in different interesting [62:36] things but [62:38] it's kind of weird it's nobody else [62:41] ever duplicated it and i don't think [62:42] anybody ever would [62:44] but it's a serial port were you thinking [62:48] at that point about [62:51] applications for this chipset did you [62:55] did you consider what it might be used [62:58] for [62:59] what software might be needed to make it [63:03] a unit for a future system [63:08] well not really because [63:11] i i kind of had my boundaries pretty [63:14] fixed chuck you're doing the marketing [63:16] you that's your job you tell us what we [63:18] need we'll make it happen [63:20] and will he was somebody chuck found in [63:23] the neighborhood so to speak [63:25] that really knew applications very well [63:27] will did the hardware manual chuck did [63:29] the software manual [63:31] so that we were really we had her focus [63:34] so that's how we thought we'd be [63:36] successful you focus on that you focus [63:38] on this [63:39] and so coming back to your questions [63:41] some of these questions [63:43] i wasn't involved with however i did [63:46] help get the pong chip [63:48] i think the pond chip was manufactured [63:50] part of it part of the volume was [63:52] manufactured by mls technology [63:54] or another atari chip so i actually [63:59] worked through some of the details of [64:00] getting that figured out [64:02] and so that and the vic-20 [64:05] i worked with the design engineers on [64:08] the vic-20 [64:09] now chuck was completely opposed to [64:13] what i think was the vic-20 and the [64:14] commodore 64. [64:16] he was pet that's industrial strength [64:18] stuff if you know about [64:19] the pet versus the commodore 64. the pet [64:23] had a [64:24] hewlett-packard 485 bus on it and this [64:26] is industrial this is [64:28] real engineering this is a real computer [64:31] and and then of course it had the [64:33] chiclet keyboard which [64:36] was jack jack's mistake but chuck had to [64:39] put up with jack [64:40] but anyhow if it had a full-size [64:41] keyboard it would have done much better [64:43] at the beginning it got a bad image from [64:46] the chiclet keyboard [64:47] so by going back to the commodore 64 [64:50] from what i remember [64:53] the design engineer al sharpenter and [64:56] he was the guy that was behind some of [64:58] the sprites and things you could do [65:00] to make these video games and other [65:02] things so that wasn't my creation that [65:04] was these other guys [65:06] so i was more into just straight laced [65:09] i o processor do what you can with it [65:13] but i did do something chuck thought was [65:15] impossible [65:16] i took that serial port and i drove the [65:19] composite video [65:20] on a tv and i made a barnstorming game [65:23] out of it [65:23] i did it in two weeks jack says you [65:26] can't do that i go [65:27] yeah i can i figured out the timing i'd [65:30] be running it at four megahertz that's [65:32] another part [65:33] that the industry really doesn't [65:36] really know about we were running two to [65:39] four times faster than [65:40] intel or motorola so not only were we [65:43] a tenth of the cost we were [65:47] twice as fast any time you're twice as [65:49] fast [65:51] twice as low a cost and we were lower [65:53] power because of the depletion of the [65:54] process [65:55] so we were lower power higher speed [65:59] lower cost and lower power [66:02] we had everything oh it was easier to [66:05] use if you know the [66:06] the coding of it so we were easier to [66:08] use lower power [66:09] lower cost and twice as fast you got a [66:12] winner [66:12] any one of those things you got a winner [66:14] all four of them [66:16] slam dunk so at that point did you [66:20] have in your mind or in your dreams uh [66:23] what [66:23] would ultimately turn into huge huge [66:26] volume for the [66:27] 6502 architecture [66:31] i didn't know what the volumes would be [66:33] all i know [66:34] is that when you design something that [66:38] is so [66:38] right what is possible [66:42] might happen there were no beds there [66:45] were there were no [66:46] you know it's like deck i think [66:50] going mos technology small company [66:53] even though it looks like it's pdp 11 in [66:55] some ways [66:56] they have to go with motorola oh wait a [66:59] minute there's these guys that know how [67:00] to do marketing [67:01] and they know how to manufacture these [67:04] things we're going to go with intel [67:06] so you go really that architecture [67:10] wins out over hours it's not about [67:12] whether the architecture is better [67:14] it's do you know what you're doing in [67:15] manufacturing will you support your [67:17] customers need like you were saying [67:19] about bob schreiner [67:20] and saying what what's going to make it [67:22] work for you [67:24] let me know what what it takes put [67:26] together a deal and see [67:28] that most technology guys didn't didn't [67:30] know how to do that [67:31] i don't think so i wasn't in the middle [67:34] of that [67:34] i wasn't capable of being in the middle [67:36] of that i was too much of a [67:38] semiconductor engineer [67:40] did you have uh problems uh with the [67:44] integrated clock [67:45] uh generator on the 6502 no [67:48] uh no it worked the first time i never [67:52] changed it [67:53] no that that worked great now that could [67:56] be because of your analog [67:58] experience you were really aware of what [68:00] it would take to make that work i was [68:02] the [68:03] right i was a clock generator guy at [68:04] motorola at the time [68:06] now since then i'd probably change some [68:08] of my concepts [68:10] but i also redesigned a cardiac [68:13] pacemaker [68:15] oscillator that was 10 kilohertz statec [68:18] 10 [68:18] kilohertz crystal it wouldn't start up [68:21] right [68:22] so then they wanted to change it to a 32 [68:24] kilohertz oscillator [68:26] while i'm at ice so i do that design [68:29] i never that's the only chip i ever [68:31] designed [68:32] in my life i never saw it's a pacemaker [68:35] chip [68:35] you go they called me on a saturday and [68:37] said bill your oscillator works [68:40] great well wonderful [68:43] am i going to see it well no it just [68:45] works fine [68:46] i never saw it that was the last i heard [68:48] of them i guess [68:50] they had to recall pacemaker chips [68:52] that's pacemakers [68:54] that that's painful literally [68:58] to replace it with my oscillator so i [69:02] was an oscillator guy [69:03] but you know the truth be known [69:07] that david gray that's here [69:11] he got my oscillators to work really [69:14] good [69:15] on my 134 and 265 chips recently [69:18] and i go he found an article and i go oh [69:22] wow so i thought i knew what i was [69:25] talking about before [69:27] but now i've been just reintroduced to [69:29] the whole thing and [69:31] i realized there's some characteristics [69:34] that i [69:35] i wasn't aware of that we put into our [69:38] circuits they work like a champ [69:40] so anyhow so my designs were successful [69:45] did you you mentioned that you'd uh [69:48] left mos at that point what [69:51] what motivated you to do that [69:58] i wanted to design microprocessors and i [70:01] wanted to design [70:04] commercial products or industrial [70:06] products [70:08] game products i didn't [70:11] have a calculator at home my kids [70:14] my son got his first game system from [70:18] nintendo was a famicom 16-bit [70:21] but it had japanese captions and [70:23] japanese characters and [70:26] and rico who supplied them [70:29] their chips rico supplied the nintendo [70:32] it's the only exclusive agreement i ever [70:34] gave anyone [70:36] exclusively for rico to supply nintendo [70:39] 816 based chips for their super nintendo [70:43] well my son got a super famicom he was [70:46] popular on the street because [70:48] what's that so [70:51] anyway i'm digressing here but [70:56] okay so let's let's talk about your [70:59] transition [71:00] from mos okay [71:03] well when we saw the [71:07] the uh situation changing because of the [71:10] business climate they were [71:14] looking like they were going to go out [71:15] of business and [71:18] chuck was moving from [71:21] a microprocessor team leader [71:24] to a systems person [71:27] so he aligned himself with [71:30] california after the [71:34] in the process of the acquisition by [71:37] commodore now [71:38] the timing i'm not sure what the timing [71:40] looks like there [71:42] but i left soon after or in the process [71:46] of commodore acquiring mos technology [71:50] in a depressed situation or a fire sale [71:54] so do you know what year this would be [71:57] 1977 [71:58] okay so uh [72:01] about the introduction i think of the [72:03] apple ii and that what was going on [72:06] and so what happened was i wanted to [72:09] work for a [72:12] a real company not a game company i'm [72:15] not [72:16] i'm not a game guy i i like the [72:19] industrial [72:20] i the high quality i only want to design [72:23] something that goes into high volume [72:26] production [72:27] used by many and so [72:30] looking at feeding the [72:33] game or calculator consumer products [72:36] that wasn't my cup of tea that's not [72:38] what i wanted to do [72:39] but then you know what are my options so [72:42] i ended up [72:44] i would interviewed at xerox they were [72:47] going to double my [72:49] go to el segundo and bob markle [72:53] if i got his name right [72:56] he i flew me out [72:59] while i'm an employee at mls and he [73:02] wants to double my salary [73:05] and i go okay so [73:08] why would you do this because it's hard [73:10] to find microprocessor designers you're [73:12] one [73:14] right so what would i be doing here [73:17] well you'll be designing where a [73:19] research lab [73:20] so you design something then we transfer [73:22] it into production [73:24] then they redesign it for their [73:26] production [73:28] manufacturing oh bob i'm in the wrong [73:32] place [73:33] my designs don't get redesigned they go [73:36] in the volume production right away [73:38] or why didn't i do it right in the first [73:39] place tell me what [73:41] so you know i'm not a research guy i'm [73:44] somebody that wants to make things [73:46] happen [73:46] and how i know i'm making them happen [73:48] because they go into volume production [73:50] they're used by people we don't throw [73:53] away designs [73:54] we just do it the right the first time [73:56] so bob [73:58] it was nice meeting you thank you i'm [74:00] going back to pennsylvania and i need to [74:02] find out my [74:02] other thing i want to do and i don't [74:04] know what that is so that's when [74:07] glenn madeline ice he's [74:10] in the seminar business he's teaching [74:13] integrated circuit design [74:15] or integrated circuit usage and he was [74:18] the first glenn was the first [74:22] uh design manager at motorola in phoenix [74:25] and so when these integrated circuits [74:28] started happening he said [74:30] you know motorola you're going to need [74:31] somebody teaching the world how to use [74:33] because integrated circuit is so much [74:35] different than resistors and [74:37] transistors now you have a new way of [74:40] doing things [74:41] and in order to get this out into the [74:43] market you're going to need somebody to [74:44] teach [74:45] integrated circuit engineering that's [74:48] his name of his company [74:50] so he hires me realizing he could use a [74:53] microprocessor guy [74:54] to teach the world microprocessors [74:58] so then he asked me to put together a [75:00] seminar [75:01] called microprocessors for management [75:05] so i put that together he hired me [75:09] straight across the board no raise i'm [75:11] going to arizona [75:13] it feels right to me i have two children [75:17] under the age of four now i'm going back [75:20] to arizona [75:24] i'm not designing anymore i'm talking [75:27] about [75:28] designs and i get a migraine headache [75:31] i'm talking to 50 people [75:34] he charged a good price for [75:38] attending the seminars and i get a [75:41] migraine headache and it's like [75:42] i don't know if it was a two-day thing [75:44] but within an hour of the first one it's [75:46] like i got a migraine headache [75:48] and nobody can back me up i gotta do the [75:50] whole thing [75:51] are you teaching people to design [75:53] microprocessors or to design [75:55] systems with microprocessors [75:59] actually you know i don't i don't [76:03] remember what i thought [76:05] you remember the headache though i [76:06] remember the headache but i remember [76:08] it's microprocessors for management [76:11] and it's about these microprocessors are [76:13] going to change the world [76:15] and so it's not about designing systems [76:17] it's about knowing what to do [76:19] because now microprocessor replacing [76:22] other forms of logic and i didn't have [76:26] it then but [76:26] it's embedding intelligence into [76:29] products [76:30] so you need to be aware of what that [76:32] would change now that's what i'd say [76:33] today [76:34] it's not what i said then and so it was [76:36] one of those things where [76:38] i was probably getting a migraine [76:39] headache because it wasn't maybe that [76:41] good but it was [76:42] the best i could do knowing what i knew [76:45] at the time [76:46] and then i would be the microprocessor [76:48] guy [76:49] in a week-long seminar and [76:53] so i don't know exactly how many [76:55] different hours [76:57] i taught but i know that [77:00] at the end of the review they reviewed [77:02] each of the consultants that were [77:04] teaching and then they fill out [77:08] you know what's your grade i was getting [77:10] failing grades [77:12] it's like this is so painful glenn i i [77:15] don't know what i'm doing [77:17] and the other guys that were doing this [77:19] i didn't feel like they knew what they [77:20] were doing [77:21] but they were getting the a's and i was [77:23] getting failing grades [77:25] if i got a c that was really good for me [77:27] and so i'm thinking [77:29] glenn i don't understand how can howard [77:32] do that and me [77:34] he gets a's he says bill [77:38] you haven't figured it out yet we're in [77:40] the entertainment business [77:42] i go glenn [77:46] he says you're trying to give him too [77:47] much information [77:49] well they're paying for it don't they [77:51] get the best [77:53] well they're coming here to arizona [77:55] because it's cold wherever they were [77:58] and you're you want to leave thinking [78:00] that they know something but [78:02] you're giving them to they can't digest [78:04] what you're giving them so it's it's [78:05] painful for them [78:07] okay well that's a mismatch because i'm [78:10] giving them the good information [78:12] but they can't use it and so i don't [78:13] know how to so then i dumb down my [78:16] what i have to say and then my grades go [78:18] up and i'm thinking [78:19] this isn't this doesn't feel right at [78:21] all so i can't do this [78:24] so that's when i asked glenn so [78:27] what's it all about that famous question [78:30] that's been asked [78:31] and probably never answered but glenn [78:35] at the coffee shop at the coffee bar [78:38] outside of his office and my office was [78:41] next door to his [78:42] glenn what's it all about [78:46] glenn answered it he said for me [78:50] it's about doing what you want to do [78:52] living where you want to live [78:54] and you're comfortable [78:58] whoa thank you glenn went back into my [79:01] office [79:02] i'm not doing what i want to do i'm [79:04] living where i want to live [79:06] but my son was just born on a credit [79:09] card [79:09] so i'm not comfortable because you [79:11] didn't have [79:12] maternity benefits so here i am not [79:16] comfortable with my [79:18] debts enjoying where i'm living [79:22] but not doing what i want to do denny [79:24] mclean i think pitched 30 [79:27] winning he had a 30-win season which [79:29] hasn't been duplicated i don't think [79:31] maybe but i don't know and that's what i [79:34] feel i feel like i'm denny mclean [79:36] i just pitched a no-hitter wins [79:40] 30 games and i'm out of the business i [79:42] need to get back in the business [79:44] so that's so my transition from mos [79:48] to consulting that's when i got to [79:52] reverse engineer all of the popular [79:56] valuable industrial microprocessors [80:00] for five thousand dollars per processor [80:02] which means that i had to set up a [80:03] little [80:04] factory line uh assembly line so [80:08] bipolar i had a bipolar consultant that [80:11] he could help me with the bipolar [80:12] then i had to put it together in the [80:14] registers and what was going on [80:16] you know i did some shell oil company [80:19] had [80:19] the first patents on dynamic rams and we [80:22] were chasing they were chasing down moss [80:24] tag [80:24] so i had to reverse engineer moss tech [80:27] and show them that [80:29] bob probscene used the same circuits he [80:32] had at [80:32] shell he was a designer at shell went to [80:35] mossdeg [80:36] and i just said well he's balanced [80:38] bitline hey he's got in the sensam [80:40] so i'd do this kind of stuff because i [80:42] knew i knew what [80:45] what the transistors were doing so i [80:47] wanted to get back and [80:49] so i transitioned to ice [80:52] a year later i'm starting my own company [80:55] because jack trammell wanted me to [80:57] design cmos [80:59] calculator chips because they're lower [81:02] power [81:02] and so there's frontier or whatever it [81:05] was semiconductor [81:07] southern california is it frontier or [81:10] pioneer i don't know something like that [81:14] i think it was frontier like the [81:15] airlines i think [81:17] but i'm not sure but anyhow that was [81:20] the cmos manufacturing for commodore for [81:24] cmos [81:25] calculator chips that's how i got [81:27] started [81:28] so did that's western design center so [81:31] yeah did that [81:32] happen before you left ice or did you [81:34] leave ice [81:36] and and then start wdc [81:39] well what happened was [81:43] i was doing all this talking about [81:45] design and then [81:46] i actually trained ncr [81:49] engineers how to design microprocessors [81:53] they were using emitter [81:57] it was injection logic or emitter [82:00] coupled logic it was bipolar and [82:03] that wasn't fun for me to teach somebody [82:06] about [82:07] designing microprocessors that i did [82:09] think was a good idea [82:11] but i did what i needed to do they had [82:13] the process [82:14] whatever so ncr and then uh [82:19] i forget who else but anyhow it was just [82:22] consulting so [82:23] answering questions or giving them my [82:25] best i gave them my best [82:29] but what happened was i i went to glenn [82:32] and said i want to build up [82:34] a design capability here to do that [82:37] i need a circuit simulator and a [82:41] logic simulator so we found a logic [82:44] simulated circuit simulator [82:46] that was out of bomar ice had been part [82:49] of beaumar [82:50] the calculator company and so [82:53] frank jenkins is the same guy that was [82:56] at motorola [82:57] he did the circuit simulator and logic [83:00] simulator [83:01] i'm thinking that's good stuff that's [83:04] that works [83:05] so i knew frank and so then but frank [83:09] left motorola [83:10] selling logic simulators and circuit [83:12] simulators [83:13] back before verilog and so [83:17] what happened was that was running on a [83:20] accounting firm's [83:24] prime 300 prime was virtual memory [83:28] and so it could handle any size so [83:32] a logic circuit and so because of the [83:34] virtual memory [83:35] and then i got that to work and then i [83:40] wanted to sell logic simulators and [83:42] circuit simulators through ice [83:44] so i was building up the base for [83:46] designing chips for ice [83:49] when glenn says you know there's a [83:51] problem with [83:52] designing integrated circuits they don't [83:54] always work [83:58] but yeah but if you know how to do them [83:59] they work yeah but there's a risk [84:02] involved there and you can risk our good [84:06] good will our relationship we have [84:09] so i can't really take that risk and i'm [84:11] thinking oh my god [84:13] ah well how am i going to do this and so [84:16] then [84:17] out of the blue chuck calls me jack [84:20] wants you to design [84:22] calculated chips for him oh [84:27] okay well i need a customer [84:30] i'll go to glenn go to glenn hey glenn [84:33] i got a possibility of designing [84:35] calculator chips for commodore [84:38] glenn says no [84:41] jack ripped me off jack owes me money [84:45] it's not good i never want to do [84:46] anything with jack ever [84:48] again [84:51] but this is an opportunity for me to [84:53] design chips again [84:55] it ain't going to happen here okay glenn [84:59] so i go back and thinking is this a [85:01] two-way street or a one-way street [85:03] go back say to chuck [85:07] chuck i want to design the calculator [85:08] chips working here at ice [85:10] what do you think i got everything set [85:12] up i got circuit simulators logic [85:14] simulators we can get mass design done [85:16] and all that [85:17] nope jack doesn't want to have anything [85:20] to do with glenn [85:24] glenn's a good guy what do you mean now [85:27] glenn ripped him off i'm thinking how [85:28] can he both rip both [85:30] each other off so that's when i decide [85:34] well i can't do it here [85:38] start my own company so that's when i on [85:40] mother's day weekend [85:43] in 1978. i think [85:46] mother's day was maybe the 13th of may [85:49] that year [85:50] i don't know but anyhow i visited jack [85:53] and chuck [85:54] at a casino in las vegas [85:59] jack's down ten thousand dollars when i [86:01] arrive [86:02] then he turns around and winning [86:05] seventeen thousand dollars that's what i [86:06] remember he says [86:08] well you brought me luck let's go talk [86:11] go up to his room [86:12] chuck's sitting here jack's sitting [86:14] where you are i'm sitting over here on [86:16] the sofa [86:18] jack says so what do you want to do bill [86:21] i said well i'd like to design [86:25] integrated circuits for you okay how are [86:27] we going to do that [86:29] i'll give you a department within [86:31] commodore [86:34] i'll make you vice president of [86:36] commodore a whole division [86:39] i'll pay you more than i pay chuck chuck [86:42] is like [86:43] what where where is that coming from [86:47] so chuck wasn't too happy with that [86:49] statement from what i recall [86:52] i said well i thought about jack i want [86:54] my own company [86:56] how will that work i said well we'll [86:58] have an agreement i've been writing [86:59] agreements with [87:00] ice we'll write an agreement we'll put [87:02] milestones in it [87:04] i get paid and i'll break even [87:07] and the design will work and how you [87:09] know it'll work [87:11] is i get a royalty off of each chip so i [87:14] don't make anything if it doesn't go [87:15] into volume production [87:17] i believe in what i do i believe what i [87:20] do will be [87:20] produce volumes that's where i'll make [87:22] the profit i'll break even [87:24] and that's how it works so the idea was [87:27] he'd [87:27] pay you enough so that you had your [87:30] costs covered for the design [87:33] and all of the upside in future [87:36] was on a royalty basis yeah based on [87:40] a percentage of okay now we go back to [87:44] what happened at mos technology and why [87:46] was everybody [87:48] not happy why did everybody leave there [87:51] was a [87:52] there was some there was a learning [87:53] opportunity chuck put together [87:56] the deal guess what it is [87:59] a percentage of profits [88:03] well you get to looking at who's cooking [88:05] what books [88:06] you know when will there ever be profits [88:09] here [88:10] well you know it's how you do your [88:14] accounting what are you assigned to this [88:16] and any other thing [88:17] so there were some really unhappy [88:21] folks now chuck and i you know [88:24] we're friends now chuck's hard to live [88:26] with sometimes [88:29] and but it's that [88:32] whatever you call it the synergy of two [88:35] different styles [88:36] but you know what i call check a friend [88:40] i would [88:41] but there's some say really [88:44] i am i'm a friend of chuck's but i [88:46] understand chuck [88:47] in a way that very few people probably [88:50] understand him [88:51] and so but i know he's a winner there's [88:54] a winner there someplace [88:56] it's like that story about the pony and [88:58] all the crap [89:00] there's got to be a pony around here [89:01] with all this crap and so [89:03] i think chuck can put together some [89:05] interesting deals that only [89:06] chuck and put together it's just like a [89:08] steve jobs in a way [89:10] and so if you know him that way [89:14] life is exciting so to speak [89:16] opportunities [89:18] so so what was the deal that you [89:20] negotiated with [89:21] jack oh yeah it's per unit per unit yeah [89:25] it's per unit so you sell it you get a [89:28] percentage of the sale price [89:30] i don't care if you make a profit or not [89:31] that's your problem but i'm getting a [89:33] percentage of whatever you sell it for [89:35] and was he going to use those some of [89:37] those chips for internal use as well [89:38] yeah [89:39] and how did you get compensated for [89:41] those oh he never did [89:42] he never manufactured anything i did [89:46] ever which is interesting right [89:50] what he did was when i i duplicated the [89:53] lc5k3 [89:55] chip out of toshiba that was some [89:58] interesting design there's a serial [90:00] processor and it's hard to reverse [90:03] engineer [90:04] an lcd in planet resistors [90:08] you can't see them on the surface so you [90:10] go how is that happening [90:12] and you have these nodes that aren't [90:14] connected up to anything [90:15] well they've implanted resistors in [90:17] there you couldn't see [90:18] so i had to figure that out it makes you [90:21] use your imagination more [90:23] when you well that doesn't make any [90:24] sense that doesn't make it [90:26] then they also embed into it some [90:30] circuits that are phantom circuits [90:33] that would confuse somebody trying to [90:35] reverse engineer so all these tricks [90:37] these guys used [90:38] well i got it to work but guess what [90:40] jack wanted to do [90:42] he wanted to get the japanese price [90:46] which was half of the american price so [90:49] he wasn't going to buy any chips [90:51] he wasn't going to build any of my chips [90:53] he wanted the chip to design [90:55] so he could go back as a negotiating [90:57] okay [90:58] well did he have that idea from the very [91:00] beginning [91:02] i i don't know jack was shrewd [91:07] he may not have he may i don't know but [91:10] he was a gambler right [91:12] he was a gambler so if he's going to [91:13] gamble [91:15] and he's saying well could we build this [91:16] any less expensive than [91:18] buying them from toshiba he's making the [91:22] business decision it wasn't about my [91:23] design running [91:25] in a factory it was about can he make [91:26] more money off of [91:28] getting a better price from toshiba okay [91:31] so we were [91:32] talking about the toshiba calculator [91:35] chip [91:35] that you did for jack and you mentioned [91:38] that [91:38] uh you you did the design but he didn't [91:41] use [91:42] no your chip no and actually i designed [91:45] a four bit microprocessor [91:47] parallel now the toshiba chip was serial [91:52] but in order to get that to a scientific [91:54] calculator now [91:55] now we're going after the scientific [91:56] business the other one was five function [91:59] and that's the low end then we're going [92:02] to go [92:02] scientific in order to do the scientific [92:06] i said we needed to do parallel not [92:08] serial [92:10] and so you think could we do the 6502 [92:13] the 6502 would not have been good [92:16] because it's floating point 64-bit [92:20] we have to do 64-bit math but sometimes [92:24] we might not do 64-bit [92:26] we might do 24-bit [92:29] like the mantissa and the exponent [92:33] on a single precision right [92:37] so i have to be able to change from [92:38] 32-bit to 64-bit [92:40] and or other whatever the math [92:44] we need it would work so chuck had a [92:47] code [92:47] a guy that programmed it his name was [92:50] shiraz [92:51] and so shira i don't know if he was in [92:54] india or he was in northern california [92:56] so shira and i worked up what we were [92:59] going to do [93:00] i don't know how much chuck was involved [93:02] with it he didn't seem to be involved [93:03] with it [93:04] and i wanted will to help me with this [93:06] because [93:07] you know i'm a semiconductor guy i'm not [93:10] a processor guy [93:11] really if you think about it i had to [93:13] add on the microprocessor [93:16] functionality working with the market [93:19] like [93:19] what we've talked about so as it turns [93:22] out [93:23] a 4-bit risk processor it had like 16 [93:26] instructions but i what i had [93:30] was a field [93:33] a 4-bit field that would tell you how [93:35] many nibbles [93:37] so if i wanted to do a 64-bit i'd have a [93:40] 16 4-bit nibbles [93:43] so it's a cool processor and it also [93:46] helped with the lcd interface [93:48] so i had the lcd interface also [93:52] would be supported by this four bit [93:56] risk processor that could do 40 64 [93:59] any 4 8 12 16 all the way to 64 bit [94:03] i could do that and so i had this new [94:06] instruction set [94:07] and the 6502 wouldn't have been good at [94:11] that and keep the size down but then [94:14] another thing that was the achilles heel [94:16] that i didn't know about at the time [94:19] because [94:20] sam trammell jack's son in japan [94:23] knew the characteristics of what was [94:25] going on in the calculator industry [94:27] and one microamp of standby [94:30] is a lot so you couldn't even have one [94:33] microamp standby [94:34] but i didn't know that and i should have [94:37] known that but i didn't [94:39] and so what i designed into [94:42] this is a single transistor dynamic ram [94:45] using what probe's team did what i [94:47] learned at ice [94:49] so i had a single transistor [94:51] non-self-aligned [94:53] metal gate dynamic ram on the chip [94:56] so i could save space on the because [94:59] everything else had static [95:00] so here i am thinking the semiconductor [95:03] technology [95:04] that i knew and i got it to work and it [95:07] works fine [95:08] uh worked fine but too much power [95:12] you had to re refresh it so i had to [95:14] have a refresh [95:16] cycle in there so i had to refresh the [95:18] memory and that [95:19] was over a microphone so that wasn't a [95:22] good design [95:24] how did you get involved at the western [95:27] design center in the 65 [95:30] co2 how did that project start [95:33] okay so [95:37] xerox i have to say [95:40] the first customer after [95:44] commodore now commodore didn't want to [95:46] see cmos 6502 [95:49] the nmos was low power enough for things [95:51] like the pet and [95:52] these other things they were it was [95:54] already lower power than anything intel [95:56] or motorola had [95:57] so they weren't interested in this cmos [96:00] version [96:02] so after jack was fired [96:05] i thought he quit because he made a [96:06] billion dollars or something like that [96:09] commodore sales was over a billion [96:10] dollars which is a big deal for [96:12] commodore [96:13] but apparently jack was kicked out by [96:15] irving gold [96:16] and i didn't know that until the book [96:18] was published about [96:20] on the edge that book you're familiar [96:22] with that right so what happens is [96:28] they pull up stakes they brought a a [96:30] truck [96:32] you know whatever a truck by the office [96:34] took all their equipment [96:37] and take off with all the equipment that [96:39] they felt was theirs [96:41] from office that i had a fifty thousand [96:43] dollar note due [96:44] on in six months i just purchased this [96:48] thinking we we're gonna do well and then [96:51] they [96:52] they didn't want to do anymore i didn't [96:54] have any other customers that's one [96:56] thing jack [96:56] jack said exclusive you don't work for [96:59] anybody else you work for me you don't [97:00] work for anybody else [97:02] what i translated is i can't even talk [97:05] to anybody else [97:06] like sales i can't set up a next [97:08] opportunity [97:09] so when jack pulled up with his truck so [97:12] to speak [97:12] it's the guy from california the cmos [97:15] the design manager there he took [97:18] everything he thought they owned [97:20] and left that day and so then what i'm [97:23] doing is saying oh wow [97:25] three kids under the age of six [97:30] one customer gone now what am i going to [97:33] do [97:34] i called bob marco at xerox [97:37] hey bob i'm available [97:41] because so this was must have been near [97:43] christmas [97:45] can you come over at what year 19 [97:49] 1980. he goes [97:53] can you come over i want uh yeah i need [97:56] to talk to you [97:56] sure i'll be over in next flight so you [97:59] know bank accounts probably on a credit [98:01] card and all this other stuff [98:02] so then i go over and meet with bob and [98:05] i said so bob [98:07] so what do you have in mind he says well [98:10] bill i now that i have you i couldn't [98:13] hire you [98:14] and i took in their vice president of [98:17] commodore [98:18] xerics is going to give them their most [98:20] advanced process [98:23] just to have a part of my time [98:26] and bud fry was their vice president at [98:29] the time who was [98:30] managing me we met at xerox [98:34] and bud for i listened to him no [98:38] no we went 100 of bill [98:41] sorry so then when they pulled up stakes [98:44] then i go back to bob now bob's [98:47] saying come on over and let's talk he [98:49] said he said what happened [98:51] i said well i don't i don't have any [98:53] business you know exclusive [98:54] for commodore commodore left i don't [98:57] have anything to do [99:01] okay talks to his secretary that's we [99:03] had secretaries back then [99:06] excuse me uh she leaves [99:09] comes back with an envelope [99:13] bob hands the envelope to me [99:16] i open it 25 000 chat [99:24] bob what's this about he goes [99:27] you have a nice holiday i said but what [99:30] are we going to do [99:32] we'll figure it out after the holiday [99:34] yeah but [99:35] why would you just give me 25 000 [99:37] without [99:38] any contract or anything he says bill [99:42] when a microprocessor design engineer [99:44] becomes available [99:47] you lock them down [99:50] i want to talk to you after the holiday [99:52] we'll figure it out [99:56] well thank you bob came back i want you [99:59] to [100:00] teach my guys how to design [100:01] microprocessors [100:03] that's when i hired diane and [100:06] trained her in five weeks to help me [100:08] make good on my [100:10] my contract so i taught her mass design [100:14] but anyhow that whole process [100:17] is so random that you go [100:20] how does that figure into anything go [100:25] well [100:28] it's the way it worked it's the way it [100:30] happened so how did you get from [100:32] teaching xerox to design microprocessors [100:36] to [100:37] to restarting the 6502 [100:40] legend okay so the 65co2 came [100:44] out of the fact that gte while i was at [100:47] ice i gave a seminar on microprocessors [100:51] for management so they were one of your [100:54] students [100:55] at jte eminem semi remember [100:58] okay we were talking about that earlier [101:00] well e m semi [101:02] was there and fran kirsch who has no vow [101:05] in his last name i think it's cr [101:08] krch fran kirsch was the marketing guy [101:12] for eminem semi and he [101:16] i guess was convinced by glenn that this [101:19] would be a good [101:20] investment on eminem semi to hear this [101:22] seminar or whatever [101:24] not exactly sure what happened there but [101:28] friend knows me [101:33] dr uh desmond sheehan [101:36] got his phd from stanford got his [101:39] undergraduate from in scotland i think [101:43] he is the vice president of technology [101:46] he was the vice president of technology [101:47] at the langkirk division up here [101:50] and he he was the one that proposed [101:52] semiconductor operation to gte [101:55] corporate so he needs to make this work [101:58] and his career is attached now [102:02] to getting technology into the factory [102:05] because he's convinced corporate they [102:08] need to be in the semiconductor business [102:10] and so frank kersh is a marketing guy [102:14] and so fran knows me [102:17] introduces me to dez dez and i hit it [102:20] off [102:21] dev says i need to send you to the attea [102:25] division of gte [102:26] and lenker no not lanker [102:29] in uh outside of antwerp belgium [102:34] so i first international flight i got to [102:36] get this and so i'm [102:37] going over there and they have a 6802 [102:41] based key system for [102:45] telephones so they're telling me what [102:48] they need [102:49] for the 6802 6802 [102:53] serendipitously mitel [102:56] had a a unipolar dope polysilicon [103:00] which they were the first to do that and [103:02] it's i [103:03] oxide isolated so it's lower capacitance [103:07] so i know that oxide isolated [103:10] unipolar dope cmos is winner [103:15] that's what we need gt [103:18] figures is that on their own but [103:22] serendipitously i have my secretary [103:26] call the sales office for mitel [103:29] where gte got their process i didn't [103:31] know they got that [103:32] so they got license on the 6802 and the [103:35] process from mitel [103:36] i have my secretary call the sales [103:40] office in california [103:42] i get online with him he says can i can [103:44] can we meet in chicago [103:46] on sunday this is a friday what [103:50] yeah i want to meet in chicago or [103:52] wherever it was [103:54] or montreal or someplace that's where my [103:56] telsemi was in [103:58] montreal no no ottawa so we have to meet [104:00] at this airport because you can't fly [104:02] directly into ottawa [104:04] and so it's like minus 30 degrees [104:07] it's 70 degrees in arizona it's in like [104:10] whatever [104:10] february and so [104:14] i go there and they're saying [104:18] we fired our guys that were in lake [104:20] tahoe [104:21] designing the 6802 and it only runs at [104:24] 250 kilohertz [104:26] and we need it to run the original spec [104:29] was 5 megahertz i said [104:31] if it's so far off i i think i can get [104:34] it to a megahertz or two megahertz but [104:35] not five i don't think i can do five [104:38] but it'll have to be totally redone and [104:40] i don't think you want me to do that but [104:41] i think i can get it to [104:43] to run it one to two megahertz if that [104:45] would work for you because that's what [104:47] the original one worked at anyway [104:49] so you'd be matching up with the nmos [104:50] but you're not doing everything you [104:52] could have done [104:53] had those guys knew what they were doing [104:55] well we fired them [104:56] because they were apparently two forms [105:00] of snow and [105:02] they were not really working too hard [105:04] and enjoying themselves on the slopes [105:06] and other ways [105:07] and so you go how serendipitous is [105:11] this so i said what you know [105:15] basically i'll do this for fifteen [105:17] thousand dollars [105:18] they give me a check just like xerox did [105:22] now i got i got the wolf away from my [105:24] door for another whatever [105:26] and so another month maybe or two and so [105:30] so then now it's cmos [105:33] unipolar dope poly good [105:37] oxide isolated wow this will be good [105:40] i started my own process i had my own [105:42] rules called oxycmos [105:44] for oxide isolated cmos [105:47] so i had my own design rules and [105:49] everything and so then [105:51] dez sends me to belgium okay so i go to [105:54] belgium [105:55] listen to these guys 6802 they're using [105:59] the nmos version [106:00] and we want to add this and that the [106:02] modem features and dialing features and [106:05] all that [106:05] so i brought back the spec that's what [106:07] that asked me to do [106:08] so then i put together two proposals [106:12] we could either do the 6802 version [106:15] or the 6502 version [106:18] so aldous wilkins at gt now running he's [106:21] the operation vice president [106:22] running gte vice president running their [106:25] operation [106:26] out of motorola he's got motorola people [106:29] all around them [106:32] and they're not happy with the 6502 [106:34] because i left motorola [106:36] and the 6502 stole some of their thunder [106:39] right [106:40] so here's their all motorola and i got [106:43] gte [106:45] vice president dez is there we're having [106:48] a meeting [106:49] otis wilkins in his office and [106:54] i at some point so i presented [106:59] 6802 two chip version [107:02] 6502 one chip version [107:07] so presented that [107:12] otis looks at dez and me [107:15] says i'll be i'll be back in a little [107:17] bit so i thought he had to go to the [107:19] bathroom [107:21] but what he did was talk to [107:24] fran kirsch and frank kerr says to him [107:28] hey it's been my experience [107:31] that the smallest chip wins [107:36] every time he comes back [107:39] says to dez it's your call dez [107:43] you're you're the man you you make the [107:45] choice [107:46] dez says is 6502 based [107:54] i got emotional but i had to wait until [107:57] i got in my car [107:59] wow that surprised you [108:03] it was the right decision [108:06] sometimes in big corporations the right [108:08] decision isn't made [108:10] dez was the one he knew [108:13] technology and when it was his turn [108:16] he picked the one that he believed in i [108:18] designed every chip that they had at gt [108:21] all the chips that i designed they were [108:24] a licensed ceo [108:26] so that's how the 6502 came about and [108:29] then rockwell licensed it like [108:31] the same week or whatever i don't i [108:34] always think gte was first and rockwell [108:35] was second but [108:36] i think that's the way it was but anyhow [108:39] the 65 co2 was [108:41] it rockwell put in billions of [108:44] modem chips because they use the cmos [108:47] 6502 [108:48] in their modems that they were selling [108:49] so how many [108:51] 65 xx cxx [108:56] instances do you think there are in the [108:57] world well there have been estimates [109:00] i you know actual number i've been [109:02] saying 5 to 10 billion for the last [109:04] 15 years and we sell about 100 million a [109:07] year [109:08] so you know these little video games [109:10] that you can get at [109:12] walmart for 15 bucks they have my 8 16 [109:15] oh [109:17] those chips are sold for [109:21] i don't know 25 cents [109:24] full system on a chip 25 cents i mean i [109:26] don't know what the margins are but [109:27] they're very small [109:28] of course apple used the uh apple [109:32] yeah apple they use it in the apple 2c [109:35] and the apple 2e [109:37] but you know if you add up all the apple [109:39] pro you know how many millions did they [109:41] sell [109:42] five million i don't know what the [109:44] number is 10 million maybe [109:46] commodore sold maybe 50 million [109:49] but the 6502 used in floppy disk [109:51] controllers and modems [109:54] and game systems that you never heard of [109:58] they're billions so why do you think [110:01] that is bill what is it about [110:04] the architecture that [110:08] that has attracted so much usage [110:12] right well i think we talked about this [110:15] earlier [110:16] the architecture was never labeled [110:19] properly [110:20] ever so when you look at [110:23] the architecture and you look at how it [110:26] was used for apple [110:27] commodore atari nintendo what you'll [110:31] find is that [110:32] the architecture provides for powerful [110:36] solutions [110:37] based upon addressing registers [110:39] effectively [110:41] so we had zero page as an example three [110:44] cycle accesses [110:45] and so we could actually access [110:48] memory registers addressable registers [110:52] in memory to do floating point fashion [110:55] you could do [110:56] on an 800 or an eight anything out of [110:59] intel [111:00] you can i have this on my website and i [111:02] didn't do it [111:03] i didn't do the benchmarks instruction [111:05] level benchmark [111:06] gte did it they come back when they did [111:09] this they go [111:10] bill did you know how awesome your [111:12] microprocessor is in comparison to like [111:15] the z80 and the 6800 and the 8080 [111:19] i go really [111:22] well what that tells me is that they [111:25] didn't do it as well as they could have [111:27] because i'm doing as good as you can so [111:30] that means that they [111:30] didn't it's not like they could have [111:34] but why didn't they i don't know but [111:36] addressable register architecture [111:38] provides the resources to do anything [111:41] with this [111:42] little little processor that's why it [111:45] was used effectively [111:47] in these others these early systems it [111:49] just is two to four times better than [111:51] the other guy [111:52] and did wozniak know that [111:56] i don't know he was maybe buying it for [111:58] its price [111:59] but then that would mean that he [112:02] fell into something that really was [112:04] effective but i'm saying when you do it [112:06] the best you can do it [112:08] and nobody can do it better you know [112:11] that [112:13] but does the other person know that no [112:15] they'll use [112:16] what the marketing guys sell them and if [112:18] it matches up [112:20] they have a match they make money that's [112:23] the end of the day [112:24] or the end of the conversation but for [112:26] me [112:28] the architecture is the best it can at [112:31] eight bits [112:32] and the pipelining and what we did there [112:35] was to minimize the number of [112:37] transistors [112:37] so we did it the best possible that's [112:40] what we know [112:42] when you uh [112:45] i think it could be said that you [112:47] invented the idea of [112:49] a microprocessor ip as a [112:53] as a business did you have that idea and [112:56] then pursue it or did you [112:58] find yourself doing it and then realized [113:01] what you were doing how did that come [113:02] about [113:02] okay glenn madeline again glenn madeline [113:06] told me taught me that [113:11] if in the consulting business you can [113:14] get somebody to pay for a study [113:18] you get paid for that way then you give [113:21] a seminar on it [113:22] then you sell the book you can sell it [113:24] three ways and everybody's happy [113:26] there's nobody complaining about that [113:29] the original guy got what he wanted [113:31] the next guy get what do you want they [113:32] all get one so if you can sell it three [113:34] times [113:35] so i'm thinking hey if i [113:38] design it 65 co2 [113:42] and i license it 10 times [113:45] that is better than what glenn was doing [113:48] but the idea [113:49] glenn started in my head so then i'm [113:52] thinking [113:53] you know a microprocessor can be used [113:55] for so many different [113:56] things and really applying the [114:00] microprocessor to [114:02] an application application specific [114:05] requirement is better left up to the guy [114:08] that knows [114:09] the market opportunity so for me [114:12] licensing a microprocessor [114:15] fulfilled glenn's business concept [114:18] and i could design just the building [114:22] blocks and somebody else can [114:24] enhance them for their market separation [114:27] their market needs [114:28] and so to me so i've licensed it [114:31] not 10 times but over 60 times [114:34] throughout the years [114:35] and so what was happening at the time [114:38] that i licensed it [114:39] was everybody was looking at well i have [114:42] a factory that needs a second source [114:44] ami was second source to motorola at the [114:46] time so what people were trading designs [114:51] so that their customer was supported if [114:54] they went out of business [114:55] now companies like [114:59] intel might have i don't know how many [115:01] factories 20 factories that could run [115:02] the same design [115:04] so it's not the second sourcing anymore [115:06] so what i was doing is licensing for a [115:08] fee [115:10] then i could do what i wanted to do and [115:13] actually [115:14] collecting royalties i get a quarterly [115:17] fee [115:17] i get royalties and i get i used to get [115:21] sometimes [115:21] the nre for the startup of the whole [115:24] thing i still do that [115:26] but i i'm very flexible i meet the needs [115:30] of my customer so you you need this you [115:33] need that [115:34] i'll mix and match to get the [115:36] opportunity because [115:37] it's getting to know one another and [115:39] what's what's the right [115:41] form of thing so what i'm doing with [115:43] chuck right now is the right form of [115:44] things which could be [115:46] the most lucrative thing i've ever done [115:48] working with chuck again [115:50] but he has to make good on his marketing [115:52] so [115:53] so there you go so i think it's it's [115:56] it's the idea that [115:58] i needed to change the equation and for [116:01] me [116:02] changing the equation is licensing for a [116:04] fee [116:05] at first and then for fee and royalties [116:09] and then just to prove that they had an [116:11] accounting system early on [116:13] i have a quarterly fee and it starts [116:15] with the fee and so now i have qualified [116:18] that they know how to [116:19] communicate financially and now [116:23] good luck with your market so i cheer [116:25] i'm a cheerleader [116:27] so i cheer for people do you [116:30] um do you have a favorite [116:33] application of the of the co2 [116:37] that's come over the years i have [116:40] favorites in [116:42] various categories how's that because i [116:44] can't pick one [116:46] i i just can't pick one [116:50] the defibrillator pacemaker one [116:54] i actually did all the life tests and [116:57] everything and supplied [116:59] defibrillator chips to a company uh so i [117:03] knew [117:04] the testing cost was over a hundred [117:05] dollars per unit just to test to make [117:08] sure that they were [117:09] you know what they called infant [117:13] death or whatever it's called so that [117:16] you don't want to embed a chip that's [117:18] going to die in the first [117:19] year but if it passes that test then you [117:22] know [117:23] from your own experience that'll last [117:24] for a long time and so [117:27] i i needed to go through all that [117:29] learning experience but then i [117:30] needed to find somebody that would [117:32] manufacture life [117:34] grade tests and how that happened was [117:38] nobody motorola got out of the business [117:41] harris got out of the business [117:42] inner cell if they were combination rca [117:46] 1802 who would use an 1802 and a [117:48] pacemaker i don't know [117:49] but a company i licensed ela medical [117:53] part of [117:54] l'oreal pharmaceuticals was the first to [117:56] embed a microprocessor in a human body [117:59] for life support so these kind of people [118:02] looked for me for two years because i [118:05] had a clause [118:06] in all of my agreements still there that [118:08] you can't tell anybody about [118:11] your license so my licensees couldn't [118:14] tell anybody [118:16] where they got it you know wow that [118:18] sounds like negative marketing [118:20] well this medical company out of [118:22] australia [118:23] said they looked for me for two years [118:25] somebody [118:26] must have not honored my agreement [118:28] because they told [118:30] because they said we went to gte they [118:32] have the same instruction set they went [118:34] to [118:34] rockwell they have the same instruction [118:36] set and they all said it's their [118:37] microprocessor [118:39] but somebody but i don't know who it was [118:41] told them who it was [118:43] me so we're back to [118:47] why are you picking me because we can do [118:50] business the other guys are getting out [118:52] of it [118:53] for one reason lawyers so if they have a [118:56] problem [118:57] they're going to sue you and they don't [119:00] want any part of that [119:02] i said okay well in my agreement you're [119:05] going to have to agree to [119:06] indemnify me against everything [119:10] so and we want to be real understanding [119:13] that i'm giving you [119:14] everything i know so when the judge asks [119:17] the question [119:19] what was your part in this i'm saying i [119:20] gave him everything i know [119:22] you've got all the source all the [119:24] information [119:29] so that's so i'm probably one of the few [119:32] companies [119:32] that are indemnified by my customers [119:36] so that's just i need to solve the [119:40] problem [119:40] this the problem is is that you cannot [119:43] not use [119:44] the world's best microprocessors [119:48] to save lives so [119:52] you you've evolved the architecture over [119:54] the years [119:55] somewhat tell us about uh what [119:58] what changes you've made and why well [120:01] listening to your customer is a good [120:02] thing [120:04] gte the original packet switching i [120:07] think for the darpa net [120:09] was out of a company called telenet [120:13] packet switching and so gte [120:16] des sent me to virginia and said [120:20] we need to see what they want in this [120:22] microprocessor we're going to design [120:24] so they use the sixty five or two set [120:27] they said [120:28] there's no other microprocessor [120:30] available that can outperform [120:32] the 6502 for packet switching if we [120:35] could have memory lock that would mean [120:37] one processor working on [120:38] a piece of information wouldn't be [120:41] interfered with if it's doing a read [120:43] modify write back into memory so if you [120:46] could hold off that put memory block on [120:48] there [120:49] and if you could do some bit [120:50] manipulation [120:53] i forget what it was that they asked me [120:55] so there were just a few features that [120:56] they [120:57] asked me for and i put them in so [121:00] those were why the enhancements then [121:03] rockwell [121:04] wanted the bit manipulation instructions [121:06] put in [121:07] which i put in [121:10] but it conflicts with my 816 opcodes [121:14] but they wanted to be able to set memory [121:16] bit reset memory bit [121:17] or clear memory bit and branch on bit [121:20] set and branch them by clear those four [121:22] so rockwell wanted those so i put those [121:24] in [121:25] so uh i don't know ncr is a licensee of [121:28] mine was a licensing of mine [121:30] and so i don't think they asked me for [121:33] anything but [121:33] i listened to them and that's where the [121:35] enhancements come from [121:37] how did you uh get to the 32-bit [121:40] 16-bit architecture first [121:44] well nobody wanted it but i wanted it [121:50] i figured that if i could do the 16-bit [121:53] and make it compatible completely [121:56] with the 8-bit i can get the 16-bit [121:59] accepted [122:01] excuse me so what happened is [122:04] i went to apple and apple came to me [122:08] they said well this is what we'd like so [122:11] they gave me these features that they'd [122:12] like [122:14] but they said we're not going to use it [122:16] so [122:17] why are you telling me what you would [122:19] like then [122:21] and i i don't know factually if this is [122:24] correct [122:24] but i was told that wozniak came back to [122:27] apple [122:28] to do the apple 2x it was called [122:31] then apple 2 gs graphics and sound [122:35] and so uh so they they gave me some [122:39] features that they wanted [122:40] for 16-bit but that [122:43] they never said they want to make it [122:44] compatible with the 8-bit [122:46] run the old code but i figured wait [122:49] if you run the old code and i had an 802 [122:54] which was an 816 that was pin [122:57] compatible so you could plug it right [122:58] into the old apple ii socket [123:01] learn that from motorola right so if you [123:04] plug it into the old socket [123:05] hey you got a you got a customer so [123:09] mine was the first processor to emulate [123:13] the previous generation so i did that [123:16] but i i remember visiting apple for the [123:19] last design review [123:22] and they said bill you know we're not [123:24] going to use it we have our own 16-bit [123:26] microprocessor [123:28] really what's that 68 000 [123:33] okay so you're not going to use it [123:37] right so i came back addressed my team [123:41] with tears in my eye [123:45] this is the right thing to do [123:50] somebody will want it [123:54] so we finished it up my sister actually [123:57] did [123:57] all the layout on the original design [124:00] i wanted a brother and sister to design [124:03] the only [124:05] 16-bit microprocessor in the world [124:08] and if you aim if it became popular that [124:11] would be [124:11] an added bonus that's what we did [124:15] so because i designed it at home [124:20] so i'm a i'm a double entrepreneur i've [124:23] got my little company [124:24] but i need to do this because i know [124:25] it's the right thing to do i did it at [124:27] home [124:28] on a game table brought it in my sister [124:31] was the only layout designer because [124:33] everybody else was brought had to do the [124:35] projects they were on [124:37] so it's got an interesting history but [124:40] newsweek they call it there's a [124:43] there's a mythological figure that looks [124:45] forward and backward at the same time [124:48] and the article it's a short article [124:50] they had that 816 is that [124:53] so then they came back and actually [124:56] apple used it [124:57] in the apple 2gs i went to apple [125:00] and dan hillman that dan helmut [125:04] i think he was the project leader on the [125:07] print circuit board design [125:09] of the apple 2gs he invited me up [125:12] i said what's going on he said i just [125:14] want you to come up [125:15] came up to his office he had the other [125:18] designers [125:19] of the apple 2gs there [125:24] and i don't know if they gasp but it [125:26] seemed like they may have [125:28] because dan hands me the first [125:31] pcb that was fully stuffed it says bill [125:36] i want you to hold this [125:39] and that's when you fill out about it [125:42] that's when i found out that must have [125:44] been very emotional [125:47] yeah i'm an emotional guy that was [125:49] emotional [125:50] and then the other guys were like how [125:52] the hell does he get to hold it first [125:56] dan's a good guy and wendell sanders [125:59] another name and he was one that visited [126:01] me [126:02] do you know wendell i met him i think [126:04] during [126:05] the apple three yeah he was the apple [126:07] iii guy [126:08] and wendell's son was the head of the [126:10] ipod division of apple recently and then [126:12] he went on sabbatical i don't know if he [126:14] came back or not [126:15] but wendell was the guy that came down [126:18] and told me what you know they might be [126:22] interested in [126:23] and wendell and i i call us [126:26] friends i went to his big home that he [126:29] was building up in the mountains [126:31] and i found out recently about two years [126:33] ago [126:34] we talked again because he wanted a [126:36] white ceramic [126:37] 6502 for his apple one he's got an apple [126:41] one did you know that [126:43] he's got a website of an apple one [126:46] and and he wanted it something happened [126:49] and [126:50] so we're trying to get him a white [126:52] ceramic 6502 [126:54] i have a couple of white ceramic [126:57] no i i think they're white ceramic maybe [126:59] there's a purple one or whatever [127:01] uh 6501 people want 65 of one [127:06] i've got three of them all right i only [127:09] have [127:10] plastic 6502s from that era i [127:14] have probably have a lot of those [127:17] i don't know i have a lot but i have a [127:19] few [127:21] i think at centertech we didn't i i may [127:24] be wrong but i don't remember selling [127:26] uh ceramics no i think it came out of [127:28] the original [127:30] mos mos because yeah because that's easy [127:33] for prototyping [127:34] uh you can you can assemble it you take [127:37] the lids off and [127:38] probe them when you could now you can't [127:40] but yeah [127:42] but also the plastic is lower cost right [127:44] and that's what you were going for [127:45] we were we were shipping shipping and [127:48] volume [127:49] and and i don't think we had military [127:52] customers or anybody who would be [127:54] willing to pay the extra [127:55] freight for uh for a ceramic package [127:59] well you've in addition to evolving the [128:03] 6502 architecture and evolving the [128:06] business model creating this [128:08] microprocessor ip [128:12] business you you've also been [128:16] pioneering at western design center in [128:18] other areas like [128:20] education for example right tell us [128:23] about [128:24] your your vision there well [128:30] on the way to education can i make a [128:34] you can make any numbers of detour [128:36] situations i want to make a detour to [128:37] another [128:38] important business model that i [128:40] pioneered the fabulous semiconductor [128:42] business model [128:44] i have a meeting gt's in the meeting [128:48] there are they're a supplier their [128:50] licensee [128:52] of my 816. wozniak's in the meeting [128:56] a couple other guys from apple are in [128:58] the meeting it's at apple's headquarters [129:00] i think [129:01] if i recall uh ncr is invited to the [129:05] meeting [129:06] their licensee of my 65 co2 [129:10] rockwell and ncr got together for a [129:13] cmos version of the 6500 one [129:16] one chip microcomputer ncr called it the [129:19] austin chip [129:21] code name bob jones [129:24] ncr is there out of fort collins [129:28] he knows what the meeting's about bob [129:31] jones is sitting right here [129:33] destin's over here [129:36] this is uh who's in and who's out [129:41] on supplying apple with h16 chips [129:47] gt daz says gt's and we're licensed [129:50] we're ready to go [129:54] ncr we're not in [130:00] what oh i have to think on my feet [130:06] you need two sources right okay ami [130:09] don't they build your custom chips [130:11] center tick maybe whoever [130:13] somebody yeah i said you control the [130:17] the quality of those custom chips you [130:19] put in your systems right [130:21] yeah okay i can re-target [130:25] my design for that process [130:28] so they can build based upon your spec [130:31] your quality standards [130:33] the 816 i'll be the second source gt's [130:36] the first source [130:38] we don't need ncr that was the boy that [130:41] was the birth [130:43] of the fabulous summit connector model [130:45] and so then [130:46] sanyo a licensee of mine they are the [130:49] best [130:49] ever quality great quality [130:53] they were supplying wafers and i only [130:55] think i had to pay for some of them [130:57] because they were licensing [130:58] they wanted to see that it would run on [131:00] their foundry so they were [131:02] testing packaging everything based upon [131:04] being licensed [131:06] so i had a complete second source in [131:08] sagna [131:09] i mean a complete fabulous business [131:12] model with them [131:13] and so so when the fabulous [131:17] semiconductor association was started [131:18] they wanted me to be on the board [131:21] of the original charter board and i said [131:24] thanks for the invitation but i can't do [131:26] it the reason why [131:28] is because i don't want sanyo to even [131:31] ever [131:33] think i needed anybody else [131:37] for my fabulous model so you figure it [131:40] out [131:41] and i'll enjoy seeing your progress so i [131:44] wasn't on the board i was a member for a [131:45] while and i still get [131:47] their emails and stuff like that but [131:50] yeah i started that [131:51] and that was in 19 at [131:55] 84 i think [131:58] about 10 years before the fabulous [131:59] semiconductor association was started [132:02] now your question education so when [132:06] you you do these things and you know you [132:09] want more engineers [132:12] to be creative applying the sciences [132:16] practical application engineering is the [132:18] pr [132:20] excuse me engineering is the practical [132:23] application of science and math [132:25] electrical engineer is all about [132:27] electronics [132:28] and as a semiconductor engineer you want [132:31] to know the physics [132:32] of the semiconductor materials and how [132:34] to take best advantage of [132:36] you know electronic electron movement [132:40] in those semiconductor materials and so [132:43] knowing that you'd say [132:46] well wait a minute if [132:50] a learner someone that wants to learn [132:52] about these things [132:54] has the opportunity to use it use my [132:57] technology in all of its forms [133:00] ipform we have hardware description [133:03] language viral log hardware description [133:06] language versions of all of our chips [133:08] and then we have the chips themselves [133:11] and now we just introduced in october [133:14] the abort level product that [133:17] would make it convenient for someone to [133:18] get started with a usb [133:21] port from your favorite pc macintosh [133:25] smartphone i call them smart things [133:27] something with a microprocessor i call [133:29] smart thing so i don't want to keep [133:32] repeating all the different things so [133:33] just a smart thing with the usb port you [133:36] can [133:37] power and use as a terminal [133:40] for our small computers so [133:44] we have small computer boards and we're [133:47] looking for this [133:48] maker revolution uh i was in a [133:51] presentation where wozniak was the [133:53] original maker [133:55] so yeah could i go along with that [133:58] probably [133:59] but there are a lot of people that make [134:00] their own things just because they [134:02] wanted [134:02] the joy of seeing something they did [134:05] work [134:08] i may be one of those in a specific [134:10] category [134:12] called embedded intelligence technology [134:15] there's only one reason you design a [134:17] microprocessor [134:19] and that one reason is to embed [134:22] intelligence [134:23] into things the intelligence is [134:26] completed when you hook onto it [134:29] sensors and actuators that will do [134:32] something [134:33] with that intelligence and the software [134:36] the coding [134:37] of what you wanted to do [134:41] whoever is your coder if that's yourself [134:44] making something work [134:45] then that's the that's the reason why [134:47] you design microprocessors or we just [134:49] have big boxes sitting on [134:52] on floors with air conditioning units [134:54] and everything else [134:55] but the microprocessor is what changed [134:57] everything [134:58] for embedding intelligence into things [135:01] so i'm saying [135:02] in order to learn about this just like [135:05] glenn madeline [135:07] found out that you need to teach [135:10] about integrated circuits i have started [135:14] a foundation called the bill and diane [135:16] mensch [135:17] foundation to support learning about [135:21] embedded intelligence [135:23] so now i want to [135:26] say you know think about it [135:30] we all have an embedded intelligence to [135:34] do what we do [135:35] as humans and every living thing has an [135:38] embedded intelligence [135:40] so just that message alone [135:43] can help the learner figure out what do [135:47] they want to learn about nobody's [135:49] nobody you don't have a usb port you [135:52] don't have a port that [135:53] downloads the information maybe someday [135:56] you might but right now you don't and i [135:58] think [135:59] you would enjoy choose picking and [136:01] choosing from this world [136:02] wonderful world of information that we [136:05] have at our fingertips [136:06] with the smart things we have right now [136:09] so to me [136:10] education is got to be [136:13] the way of the future for humanity [136:17] and if we're in the information age then [136:20] i think [136:21] that's to support the age [136:24] of understanding so i'm all about [136:28] education i've been supporting education [136:31] financially for more than 25 years [136:36] do you see this becoming more and more [136:40] of the [136:41] future role of western design center [136:45] well yeah i think it's [136:48] it's pretty obvious that if we have a [136:51] young engineer [136:53] or a young learner like in fifth grade [136:56] i'm going for [136:57] actually i'm going for the nursery [137:02] i want the mother of their baby [137:07] to relate to [137:11] the nursery rhyme called old macdonald [137:15] had a farm [137:17] and i came up with this four years ago [137:20] in april [137:21] four and a half years ago at an advisory [137:24] meeting of notre dame [137:25] at stanford in palo alto i couldn't [137:28] sleep [137:29] one night thinking about old man [137:33] stanford had a farm [137:37] and on that farm they built a university [137:41] and at that university [137:44] they learned about embedded intelligence [137:48] and with that embedded intelligence they [137:50] created [137:52] exciting or engineering innovations [137:56] with opportunity for all [138:00] e-i-e-i-o [138:05] so when the mother knows [138:08] and the father knows their baby [138:12] has a wonderful embedded intelligence [138:17] what will you do with that [138:21] but if they never related to it that way [138:24] then there may be a missed opportunity [138:27] here and there [138:29] so that's how far back that's how [138:33] deep this interest runs [138:37] so i think that just knowing [138:40] that when you program yourself [138:45] with information and then what you're [138:48] going to do with that [138:49] processing that information then the [138:51] first person [138:53] that benefits is yourself [138:56] and when you get good at something [138:59] you'll have more left over for someone [139:04] else [139:07] so when you started this journey [139:10] that's taken you here uh 40 years ago [139:14] something like that right 43 years ago [139:20] did you have any idea where we would be [139:22] today no [139:24] no no [139:28] i knew working on the microprocessor [139:31] 6800 [139:32] pia like i said before [139:36] i knew this was [139:40] changing the equation [139:43] and i knew with the 6502 [139:47] and with chuck picking the instructions [139:50] and what we [139:50] our goals were for you know we would go [139:53] our goal was to [139:55] be price competitive with the 4040 [139:58] chipset so i designed the 6530 [140:02] which is a raw it had rom ram [140:05] i o and timer on it [140:08] and so that was used in the [140:12] kim board keyboard input monitor [140:16] so the code of the 6530 had the key [140:20] it's really uh machine code monitors [140:24] what they say on wikipedia [140:26] so it's a monitor that use the keyboard [140:28] so that's why so many people picked up [140:30] about 50 000 of them i think were sold [140:32] of the kim one very popular single board [140:35] computer probably the most popular [140:37] it probably the most endeared single [140:40] board computer of all time [140:42] well there was also a tim teletype input [140:45] monitor [140:46] and that's what i used on the original [140:48] tester for [140:50] all of the microprocessors for the first [140:52] two and a half years [140:53] and i o chips i had a little load boards [140:55] and all this for testing yeah it's [140:57] and a paper tape and that's why i was [140:59] talking to the guy that cranks the [141:02] babbage machine he knows all about [141:05] terminals [141:05] and so i want to get a terminal to hook [141:07] up to my old tester that i have [141:09] but anyhow the point is and we did a sim [141:12] at uh center tech [141:13] yeah you did a set manny lemus [141:16] right and so so that was a two chip [141:20] system [141:21] it was a 6530 plus the 6502 was going to [141:24] compete with the 4040. [141:26] i don't know that we ever really [141:28] competed with the 4040 or even tried to [141:31] i wasn't in the marketing that was chuck [141:33] and his team [141:35] so to me that was our goal [141:38] so we way overshot our goal way overshot [141:41] it [141:44] so so you asked a question what did i [141:46] know i knew what we were doing [141:48] with seminole i knew rod and i [141:51] had the conversation atomos technology [141:54] in their conference room on the second [141:55] floor [141:57] rod said if this works [142:02] as good as we think it's going to work [142:05] in his words [142:06] we can go to the happy hunting ground [142:10] as indians saying for heaven [142:14] knowing [142:18] we did something very special with our [142:20] lives [142:23] so that was rod and me we knew what was [142:26] we were doing [142:28] we didn't know specifics but we knew [142:31] what we were doing [142:33] and i in that 1973 [142:38] december when my my first [142:41] important my first child was about to be [142:43] born [142:45] is when i said chuck we could build a [142:47] home computer out of these chips [142:50] and so i knew we could do that [142:53] now the apple ii atari [142:57] computer and you know commodore 64 [143:00] vic-20 all the the beeb out of uk [143:03] the bieb is where arm came from [143:07] so the designers of the original acorn [143:10] use the 65x2 [143:11] they're the only people that ever asked [143:14] me about the abort feature on my [143:17] to this day but you'll have to tell us [143:21] about that you'll have to tell us about [143:24] i'm asking you [143:25] so what's that tell us about the [143:27] important the abort feature [143:29] well prime i had a prime 500 [143:33] so i went from the 300 to the 500 that's [143:36] a virtual memory [143:37] and what that means is that if you make [143:40] a memory fetch [143:42] and there's no physical memory there [143:45] then you have to abort [143:46] that fetch and then repair [143:51] the location you could either change [143:54] move memory around in the system [143:56] physically [143:57] it's really a memory management issue [144:00] with the address bus [144:02] and then retry so i figured [144:06] well why don't i just build an abort so [144:08] if i go [144:09] and something says i'm not there [144:13] then i don't want to change anything [144:15] inside the processor [144:18] and then i go off to an interrupt [144:20] routine [144:21] that says there's been an error detected [144:25] and then i repair the air whatever that [144:28] mean [144:29] and then i retry that's how i did it so [144:32] arm put it into their processors [144:34] i've never chased them down because [144:39] they didn't duplicate my 816. they used [144:41] my idea [144:42] but i never i i never pursued them i [144:46] talked to some lawyers in philadelphia [144:48] because i was an expert witness for [144:53] samsung and they wanted to pursue arm [144:58] and we had a conversation but [145:01] whatever so this is a long time ago [145:05] but anyhow you know the the idea of [145:07] putting in some of these features and [145:09] doing some of these things [145:10] it just felt right and so i wanted to do [145:12] it and i did it [145:15] yeah so what's next [145:19] well these boards that we introduced to [145:22] you at lunch [145:26] are what i think for me [145:29] is the most exciting thing i've ever [145:31] worked on and the reason why [145:34] is next year [145:38] right now i no longer have to say [145:41] apple atari [145:45] commodore nintendo [145:49] we have our own boards now so now we can [145:52] work directly with [145:53] kids people that want to make a [145:55] difference [145:57] but before i would always indirectly [146:00] feel good about the apple ii [146:02] and how teachers would plug in boards [146:05] into their [146:06] professors would control things that [146:09] they wanted [146:09] total control and when you're working [146:12] with the pc [146:13] you've got an asynchronous bus and [146:16] you don't have the synchronicity that [146:18] some [146:19] people want so now we have that and we [146:22] have the i o to support [146:24] sensing processing communicating as with [146:27] the usb [146:28] port on your smart thing and then [146:31] actuating [146:31] turning on lights making [146:35] motors move and do things you want to do [146:38] so it's sensing processing communicating [146:41] and actuating that's what we're about [146:43] we have an x for our accelerator we call [146:45] it [146:46] x c e l r [146:49] 8 r accelerator [146:52] so our accelerator series has that x has [146:56] these letters in the corner of each of [146:57] the x's so we're doing little things [147:00] because we're proud of what we're doing [147:04] and [147:09] we're going to directly connect with [147:12] people now [147:14] so then i won't be yeah the apple was a [147:16] great product [147:18] jobs killed it because he wanted to make [147:20] space for the macintosh in education [147:22] that was a major disappointment for me [147:26] i've heard from the teachers and the [147:28] professors that that was a loss for them [147:31] and the commodore didn't replace it and [147:34] the atari never really replaced it so [147:37] now we're doing it but we're doing it [147:39] with one small board at a time [147:42] but you're using your smart thing so [147:43] we're not trying to duplicate what the [147:45] smart thing has we're trying to add [147:47] to the smart thing so we want to work [147:50] with all smart things not just one or [147:52] the other [147:53] so we don't need a high resolution [147:54] display that already comes with your [147:57] smart thing [147:58] we don't need to have hd audio or h [148:01] to hd video or any of that that comes [148:03] with your smart thing [148:04] what your smart thing is needs the way [148:06] to interface the real world [148:08] other than the various wireless [148:10] connectivity [148:12] and so we think [148:15] we've got the right product at the right [148:16] time and [148:19] we're happy to be there and so we're not [148:22] trying to out do arm at anything [148:26] we think of arm as our [148:30] practical son got to do what they got to [148:34] do [148:35] and it's not something i want to do but [148:37] i'm proud of them [148:39] i they start it with my technology [148:42] and i wish them well i buy their [148:45] products that have [148:46] arms in them and [148:52] you know it's what we're doing so i'm [148:54] right now what we're doing is [148:56] the most exciting time in my career [148:58] because we can connect with [149:00] all levels of engineers [149:03] people that want to be engineers people [149:05] that are engineers [149:07] and you know our technology because of [149:10] our [149:11] various boards we have can service the [149:14] kindergarten through postdoc [149:17] doing something with advanced technology [149:20] using [149:20] programmable logic devices and then when [149:23] they want to [149:24] retarget to an asic [149:27] then they can retarget to an async [149:29] because of what we've done [149:31] so we open the doors to creativity [149:34] you know one opportunity at a time [149:38] but we embrace the category of [149:41] microprocessors [149:42] so that means that we [149:45] we know what it is like to be a leader [149:49] and we also know what it's like to be a [149:52] follower [149:53] although i'd say we probably aren't [149:55] following anybody [149:56] because we're doing it our way and [149:59] you know the things like arduino and [150:03] raspberry [150:04] pi and you know launch pad from ti [150:08] and some of these other things they're [150:09] wonderful they've got great features [150:12] they're very useful they are used in [150:14] education [150:15] we hope ours are too [150:20] do you see the the maker movement you [150:24] talked about we've talked about [150:26] previously as [150:31] a follow-on to the beginnings [150:34] of the [150:38] computer personal home computer [150:41] wave that you started with the 6502 [150:47] do i the question do you see the the way [150:50] that you started back [150:51] back in the day as really leading into [150:54] this [150:55] uh new world that we're seeing today [150:58] i think so uh did i start it i don't [151:01] know if i go that far [151:02] i think the technology was available for [151:05] people that saw that [151:07] that wanted to be part of that that's [151:09] why wozniak is somebody that's right [151:11] you know referred to in this category [151:13] because he did something very visible [151:15] and [151:16] out of that grew the world's most [151:18] valuable company and the most valuable [151:20] brand [151:22] it's no longer the most valuable capital [151:24] market [151:25] market cap wise but i think it's still [151:27] the most valuable brand [151:29] so can things grow that way yeah how [151:31] many of them [151:33] i think we need we only got one of those [151:35] but one of them is better than none [151:38] but do i see the maker i i think [151:42] what i'm amazed by is what people [151:46] do with their creativity i mean [151:49] right now these smart things that we [151:51] have 16 gigabytes [151:53] on a small thin it's like [151:57] really you know i can't wrap my head [152:00] around that [152:01] and so that's an example of saying [152:04] did i ever think that no [152:07] larry who is my mentor and someone that [152:11] wrote the code for my terminal interface [152:13] on my [152:14] small computers when i was designing [152:18] four uarts [152:19] on my 265 chip pieces [152:22] one uart two yards [152:25] maybe three yards but why four well look [152:28] at what we've got [152:30] and you go well i i said to him you want [152:33] to [152:33] interface to a pc you want to interface [152:35] to a printer [152:36] you want to interface through a modem [152:38] and you want to interface to a keyboard [152:41] those are the reasons and that's what i [152:43] had him design into my mensch computer [152:45] so to me this maker thing i i'm a maker [152:49] too [152:50] if you think of my men's computer as i [152:53] just wanted to have a reference design [152:54] on how you could do some of these things [152:56] so we built that it's [152:59] i only built 100 of them but this maker [153:02] movement [153:03] is very important and i think it [153:06] synergizes or energizes humanity [153:10] in a way that's never been done before [153:14] and part of it a big part of it [153:17] is the maker movement encoding these [153:20] smart things [153:22] doing things that you know that plus [153:24] this equals this [153:26] and that's what creativity is and so [153:29] opening up the doors to creativity is [153:31] what we're doing [153:32] our way and it's simple elegance [153:36] you add to it we're not successful [153:40] until you're successful [153:44] bill what would you like people to know [153:47] about [153:49] bill minch western design center and [153:53] in particular what is it that we might [153:56] not know [153:57] that this is an opportunity [154:01] to go on the record wow [154:06] wow i've tried to tell you everything [154:09] in my answers [154:14] well one thing that has never been [154:17] talked about in 1984 [154:22] wall street journal if you know the [154:24] second first page [154:28] there's two sections there used to be [154:30] two sections [154:31] they call it the second first page [154:34] in the left hand column it was [154:37] a technology article i got a call one [154:41] day [154:41] at the wall street journal said [154:46] i understand you're doing something with [154:48] apple or whatever and i go [154:49] well they use my microprocessors [154:55] but you know [154:58] what what are you talking about and so i [155:01] didn't know what [155:02] he was interviewing me for and so [155:06] it was because they were they were [155:08] introducing to the market the apple 2c [155:11] it was time to the apple 2c [155:14] i knew what the apple 2c was the apple [155:18] 2e then was retrofitted or whatever with [155:20] the [155:21] 65co2 because wozniak [155:24] said it was 20 percent faster to do some [155:26] of the things that they were doing in [155:27] basic because of some of the [155:29] improvements that i made i didn't know [155:32] if it was or wasn't [155:33] but they must have benchmarked it or [155:35] something so it was a minor improvement [155:38] so what happened was they [155:42] the wall street journal [155:46] closed with a paragraph about me [155:50] quoting me of saying apple could build [155:54] notebook size computers [155:57] using our cmos technology [156:00] we have in place today [156:04] they didn't do that nobody was talking [156:06] about notebook computers back in 1984. [156:09] they were talking about laptops they [156:11] were talking about big boxes [156:13] the osborne or whatever you want to say [156:15] i'm saying but i've said [156:17] it would be a notebook for schools [156:21] that didn't happen now it happens they [156:23] called macintoshes [156:25] but at the time you can see that [156:28] power was a big deal but performing and [156:32] doing things [156:33] that the kids could use in a notebook [156:35] for education [156:36] so that's i'm quoted in there well [156:40] rumor has it that apple was unhappy with [156:43] me because [156:44] that first column was reserved for apple [156:48] but bill gets his last thing in and so [156:52] based upon that there were professors at [156:55] asu [156:55] and other people say who's this guy in [156:57] mesa who's this guy that's getting this [157:00] and i couldn't believe how many more [157:02] people [157:03] read the worst wall street journal all [157:06] of a sudden [157:07] i'm known prudential base calls me and [157:10] says we want to take you public [157:12] you know really yeah could you meet with [157:15] us in wall street uh [157:17] at gold gold street which is right off [157:21] of wall street i think [157:22] and so i met with them and was probably [157:25] 84 [157:26] 85 because of that article [157:29] and they want to take me public and i'm [157:31] going i can still see the front of their [157:33] building [157:34] and i go you know you really [157:38] don't know what i'm doing i don't think [157:41] anybody knows what i'm doing actually [157:43] but i certainly don't know what you're [157:46] doing [157:47] and so we're like two ships passing in [157:50] the night [157:51] so thanks for the invitation thanks for [157:54] the opportunity to talk to you about [157:55] this [157:56] but no thank you i'm happy doing what [157:59] i'm doing [158:02] and i don't know what it would look like [158:04] if we did what you're thinking [158:06] because it would change everything for [158:08] me [158:10] i haven't made i'm doing exactly what i [158:13] want to do [158:15] i didn't say and i don't need your money [158:18] but basically that's what i was saying [158:21] so when i see arm do what they do [158:25] people come up to me at conferences and [158:27] said they stole [158:29] your ideas i said what what are you [158:32] talking about [158:33] well they're doing what you were doing i [158:36] go [158:37] yeah but i gave them the idea [158:40] i already knew i didn't want to do that [158:43] so [158:44] i don't know what they're going to do [158:46] with it but that when [158:48] i had that at this conference they had [158:50] just gone public [158:51] and their market cap was 10 billion [158:53] dollars well how do you feel about that [158:55] i go [158:58] i think that's wonderful i mean [159:02] i don't want to do that but the fact [159:05] that they did it [159:07] and the fact that that may have made [159:09] these smart things [159:11] that we have in our pocket the engine [159:13] for the smart things [159:15] then you see the power of the business [159:17] model and so [159:19] i couldn't be more happy about they did [159:22] it [159:23] and i passed on it i didn't want to do [159:26] it [159:27] i don't need the money i'm happy [159:31] bill thank you very very much you're [159:34] welcome [159:35] it's been a pleasure my two