Bloomberg Podcasts
AI-assisted summary of An Arizona Farmer on How to Grow Alfalfa in the Middle of the Desert | Odd Lots — original source. Check the original for full context.
Source published:
Key ideas
- Agriculture accounts for roughly 75% of water usage in Arizona, sparking debate as state authorities recently halted new residential subdivision approvals in parts of Phoenix due to lacking guaranteed 100-year groundwater supplies. (0:09)
- Arizona's arid climate acts as an open-air greenhouse, allowing farmers like Trevor Bales to harvest 10 to 12 cuttings of alfalfa annually (9 to 10 tons per acre) without the rain damage and spontaneous hay fires common in wetter regions. (12:31)
- A standard 120-day corn silage crop consumes 6 to 7 acre-feet of water, roughly matching the water requirement for an entire year-round multi-cutting cycle of perennial alfalfa. (10:34)
- Bales Hay Farm & Ranch operates without Colorado River or Salt River Project water, relying instead on high-salinity Gila River aquifer recharge and treated municipal effluent from Phoenix that legally restricts the land from growing fresh produce. (24:04)
- Lacking a public futures market, the Western alfalfa trade suffered an unregulated crash in 2023, plummeting from an export-driven peak near $460 per ton down to roughly $195 per ton within a few months. (34:24)
Detailed notes
## Background This episode of Odd Lots was published on YouTube by Bloomberg Podcasts on July 17, 2023. According to the show description, it addresses Arizona's looming water scarcity driven by drought, climate change, and urban growth, exploring whether water-intensive crops like alfalfa belong in the desert through a conversation with sixth-generation farmer Trevor Bales of Bales Hay Farm & Ranch.
## TL;DR Hosts Joe Weisenthal and Tracy Alloway speak with Trevor Bales to unpack the economics, agronomy, and water politics of desert agriculture in Buckeye, Arizona. Bales explains how constant desert heat and precision laser-leveled flood irrigation enable up to a dozen high-quality alfalfa harvests per year without rain damage, supplying premium racehorse and dairy markets. He counters popular criticism of agricultural water use by noting that Arizona farms consume less water across fewer acres than in past decades, utilizing salty basin runoff and treated municipal effluent. Bales also illustrates how unmanaged urban sprawl into raw desert, invasive salt cedar trees, and dramatic swings in unregulated hay markets create far more systemic pressure than traditional family farming.
## Atmosphere & style The discussion feels grounded, inquisitive, and pragmatic, blending the hosts' trademark macroeconomic curiosity with Bales's dry, generational trade knowledge. Moments of lighthearted humor—such as Tracy teasing Bales about nominative determinism or discussing her own leaking yard pipes—soften the tense, politically charged debate over Southwestern water scarcity. The resulting dialogue feels less like an ideological confrontation and more like an illuminating, behind-the-scenes masterclass in water physics, soil management, and the raw economic realities of modern farming.
## Bulletin - [00:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=9s) Agriculture accounts for roughly 75% of water usage in Arizona, sparking debate as state authorities recently halted new residential subdivision approvals in parts of Phoenix due to lacking guaranteed 100-year groundwater supplies. - [12:31](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=751s) Arizona's arid climate acts as an open-air greenhouse, allowing farmers like Trevor Bales to harvest 10 to 12 cuttings of alfalfa annually (9 to 10 tons per acre) without the rain damage and spontaneous hay fires common in wetter regions. - [10:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=634s) A standard 120-day corn silage crop consumes 6 to 7 acre-feet of water, roughly matching the water requirement for an entire year-round multi-cutting cycle of perennial alfalfa. - [24:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=1444s) Bales Hay Farm & Ranch operates without Colorado River or Salt River Project water, relying instead on high-salinity Gila River aquifer recharge and treated municipal effluent from Phoenix that legally restricts the land from growing fresh produce. - [34:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=2064s) Lacking a public futures market, the Western alfalfa trade suffered an unregulated crash in 2023, plummeting from an export-driven peak near $460 per ton down to roughly $195 per ton within a few months.
## Key takeaways - [00:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=9s) Water-intensive agriculture, industrial semiconductor plants supported by the CHIPS Act, and rapid suburban sprawl are in direct competition for Arizona's limited water resources. - [07:35](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=455s) Historical Arizona water infrastructure, including the Salt River Project, was originally financed by early agricultural cooperatives who mortgaged their own land to fund canals and dams. - [05:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=312s) Alfalfa functions as a resilient perennial crop that remains productive for four to five years across multiple cuttings, avoiding the annual heavy tilling and massive per-crop water spikes of annual row crops like corn. - [10:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=634s) A single 120-day corn crop consumes between six and seven acre-feet of water, matching the water required by an entire full year of alfalfa cultivation. - [12:31](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=751s) Arizona produces 9 to 10 tons of alfalfa per acre across 10 to 12 cuttings every 25 to 30 days, whereas rain-dependent states face rain damage, nutrient leaching, and spontaneous barn combustion from high internal bale moisture. - [15:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=918s) Commercial high-grade alfalfa serves premium niche markets, including Kentucky Derby racehorses and high-producing dairy herds requiring strict, laboratory-tested protein and nutrient metrics. - [20:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=1230s) Modern desert irrigation has shifted from washboard-style furrows to precision laser-leveled border basins that sheet water across quarter-mile runs with evaporative losses of 2% or less. - [20:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=1230s) High capital costs for petroleum-based PVC piping ($3,000+ per acre) create significant financial hurdles for widespread adoption of subsurface drip irrigation on large-scale forage farms. - [24:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=1444s) Bales Hay Farm irrigates using low-lying saline aquifer water and treated Phoenix municipal effluent, preventing fresh vegetable farming and making salt-tolerant alfalfa the ideal operational choice. - [24:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=1444s) Invasive salt cedar trees consume massive volumes of water along the Gila River corridor, but eradication initiatives remain stalled due to environmental protections for nesting wildlife. - [27:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=1644s) Suburban water conflicts intensified because developers expanded into arid raw desert rather than restricting new homes to retiring agricultural parcels where water rights historically transferred. - [32:26](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=1946s) Arizona farmers are operating on fewer total acres and with higher water efficiency than at historical peaks, prompting questions about why water-hungry semiconductor fabrication plants are built in the desert instead of rain-rich states. - [34:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=2064s) The lack of an alfalfa futures exchange leaves hay prices entirely driven by subjective market sentiment, swinging from peaks above $400 per ton down to $195 per ton when foreign exporters suddenly withdrew. - [38:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=2292s) Desert farming offers operational predictability that wetter climates cannot match, giving growers complete control over harvest timing and nutrient preservation without the disruption of unexpected storms.
## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=9s) The Arizona Water Dilemma and Agriculture's Share
Joe Weisenthal and Tracy Alloway open the episode by revisiting a past conversation with land broker Chase Emerson about land development in Arizona. Joe notes that while Emerson helped facilitate the transition of agricultural and raw land to residential builders, a major controversy continues to loom around long-term water sustainability. The debate recently reached national headlines after Arizona authorities halted approvals for certain new housing developments around parts of Phoenix due to concerns about guaranteed 100-year water supplies.
At the same time, Arizona has been experiencing an immense economic and population boom. Tracy points out that the state touches nearly every contemporary economic theme, from widespread real estate sprawl to the construction of massive, water-hungry semiconductor fabrication facilities supported by the federal government and the CHIPS Act. Tracy recalls asking Biden administration officials why heavy industrial plants, booming housing tracts, and water-intensive crops are all being expanded in the middle of a desert.
Joe outlines the public reaction and the simplified narrative surrounding the state’s resources: observers notice the growth and the drought, learn that agriculture accounts for roughly 75% of Arizona's water usage, and instinctively conclude that farming crops in the desert is absurd and should simply be abolished. However, Joe and Tracy emphasize that agricultural water systems in the region are vastly more nuanced than a quick soundbite suggests. Agriculture has anchored Arizona’s economy for generations, prompting the question of how desert farming arose, how the water infrastructure was originally funded, and why intensive forage crops like alfalfa remain such a prominent fixture.
- Arizona recently halted new residential subdivision approvals in parts of the Phoenix metropolitan area due to inadequate assured groundwater supplies. - Approximately 75% of all water consumed in Arizona is utilized by the agricultural sector rather than residential or municipal users. - Industrial initiatives, including cutting-edge semiconductor manufacturing plants, are competing alongside urban expansion and existing farms for scarce regional water resources.
---
[02:41](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=161s) Trevor Bales: Six Generations at Bales Hay Farm & Ranch
To explore the reality of desert agriculture, the hosts introduce Trevor Bales, the proprietor of Bales Hay Farm & Ranch in Buckeye, Arizona, situated southwest of Phoenix. Bales is a sixth-generation farmer whose family has worked the land since long before Arizona achieved statehood. Tracy jokes about nominative determinism, asking whether someone named "Bales" who bales hay could possibly be a real person or if the name is an invention. Bales laughs and explains that his family name was not changed for the business; in fact, long before the operation baled alfalfa, it was baling cotton.
```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Evolution of Bales Family Agricultural Operations accDescr: A chronological flowchart depicting the Bales family farming business from 1820s cattle ranching to modern-day alfalfa farming.
subgraph EarlyHistory ["19th Century Homesteading"] A["1820s: Belote Family Arrives in Arizona"] B["1891: Official Homestead Established<br/>(14 Children)"] A --> B end
subgraph OperationEvolution ["Shift in Enterprise"] C["Open Cattle Ranching"] D["Farming & Cattle Ranching"] E["Feedlot Supplied by Farm"] F["Specialized Farming Only"] B --> C C --> D D --> E E --> F end
subgraph ModernEra ["Twentieth Century to Present"] G["Wallace Bales marries Alberta Belote"] H["Steve Bales & Wallace buy out in-laws<br/>Establish Bales Farm"] I["Modern Day: Trevor Bales farms 1,000 Acres in Buckeye, AZ"] F --> G G --> H H --> I end ```
Bales traces his family roots back to the Belote family (`b-e-l-o-a-t`), who first arrived in the region in the 1820s and officially homesteaded in 1891, decades before Arizona became a state in 1912. The original patriarch had around 14 children, meaning that over the ensuing century, parcels of land were repeatedly divided among dozens of descendants. Today, Bales considers the family exceptionally fortunate to still farm a contiguous 1,000 acres. His great-great-great-grandfather was instrumental in digging and constructing the canal district that irrigates their fields today, and their registered cattle brand is among the earliest in the state's registry (around the 440s). The transition to the modern name occurred when Wallace Bales married Alberta Belote; Wallace and his son Steve Bales subsequently bought out the in-laws to establish Bales Farm. Over roughly 120 years, the business shifted from open cattle ranching to a mix of ranching and crop farming, then to a dedicated cattle feedlot fed by their own crops, and ultimately into an operation dedicated entirely to crop production.
---
[05:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=312s) The Agronomics of Alfalfa: Perennial Resilience in a Desert "Greenhouse"
Joe asks for a foundational explanation of alfalfa, noting that non-farmers typically envision tiny alfalfa sprouts used as salad toppings rather than large-scale agricultural forage. Bales explains that alfalfa is a dense, high-protein forage crop that serves as a critical nutritional input for producing high-grade milk and beef. While critics often label alfalfa an excessively water-hungry crop, Bales argues this perspective ignores the plant's unique biological longevity and year-round productivity.
Arizona acts essentially like an open-air greenhouse due to its constant heat and abundant sunshine. In Arizona, farmers can enter the field to cut alfalfa anywhere from 8 to 12 times in a single year. By contrast, colder states might only get two or three cuttings per season. While an alfalfa stand in colder states might last six to eight years, Arizona’s intense cutting schedule allows a stand to remain highly productive for four to five years before yields drop and the field is rotated. Bales compares this to annual row crops like silage corn:
> “It is producing great feed quality for cattle, horses, milk cows, beef cows for five years. No other crop can do that. Corn, you plant it once, it takes a massive amount of water, and then you harvest it once.”
Unlike corn, which requires huge quantities of water and heavy tilling every single season for just one harvest, alfalfa is a perennial that continually regrows after each cutting. Once an alfalfa field reaches the end of its four- or five-year productive lifespan, the Bales family plows it under, applies manure for natural fertilizer, and plants a rotational crop to replenish the soil before eventually replanting alfalfa.
---
[07:35](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=455s) The Five C's and Shifting Market Demands
When Joe observes that Arizona’s high number of annual cuttings creates an economic advantage over other regions, Bales contextualizes the state’s agricultural legacy through the historic "Five C's of Arizona": Copper, Cattle, Citrus, Climate, and Cotton. Historically, water was never viewed as a crisis in Arizona; agriculture established the territory, and early farming cooperatives financed the massive water conveyance systems that urban areas rely on today. Bales notes that when Phoenix could not afford major water infrastructure projects, such as the Salt River Project (SRP), local farmers put up their land as collateral to finance and build the canals and dams that enabled subsequent municipal development:
> “Water and agriculture were never a hot topic in Arizona until Phoenix got to be fourth, fifth, sixth largest city in the country, right? We've been farming here for—like I just said, my family's here in the 1820s doing it, so the water was never a problem until humans came in, cities came in, manufacturing came in. Farming actually paid for a lot of the water that is here in Phoenix.”
Due to its constant sunshine, Arizona produces premier yields and fiber characteristics for cotton, alfalfa, wheat, barley, and corn. While alfalfa can technically be cultivated in wetter states, the protein value and quality are inferior, and many climates cannot support it at scale.
Tracy asks whether Arizona farmers gravitate to alfalfa simply because it is a reliable cash crop that thrives under desert heat provided water is applied. Bales confirms that agriculture follows supply and demand just like any other industry. In decades past, cotton and citrus drove the local farm economy. However, changes in global textile trade, such as shifting demand from Chinese mills and complex import tariffs, severely degraded the market for Arizona cotton. Meanwhile, a regional dairy boom created massive demand for high-protein feed to generate export-quality dairy products. Alfalfa became the most efficient mechanism to fulfill that nutritional requirement. Bales points out that if every local grower tried to supply these dairies by growing annual silage corn instead of alfalfa, the total water consumption across the state would be drastically worse.
[10:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=634s) The Water Math: Replacing Alfalfa with Corn
Joe Weisenthal raises the core economic and resource trade-off: whether growing alfalfa, corn, or soy, agricultural production boils down to a fundamental calculation of water input, human labor, and output feed that ultimately converts into beef or dairy milk. He presses Trevor Bales on an earlier assertion—that substituting corn for alfalfa would actually worsen water depletion—and asks how the math of water loss balances against feed yield.
Trevor explains that while he does not personally grow corn today, his father and grandfather grew substantial quantities to supply their family feedlot. A standard short-season 120-day corn crop consumes between six and seven acre-feet of water. That single 120-day crop uses roughly the exact same quantity of water as an entire year-round cycle of alfalfa on his farm. Where Trevor defers to dairy nutritionists is on the relative energetic yield: calculating the precise nutritional energy harvested from one acre of corn versus a full year of alfalfa requires feed-science expertise beyond his direct focus, as he does not sell directly into the commercial dairy market. As Trevor puts it: “The corn crop in a short like 120 day corn uses approximately the same amount of water as my whole year uh my whole year of the crop of alfalfa which is around seven seven acre foot as we like to measure it with by acre feet six to seven acre feet.”
- A 120-day corn crop uses roughly 6 to 7 acre-feet of water, matching an entire full year of alfalfa cultivation. - Comparing the caloric and nutritional yield per acre between corn silage and alfalfa requires animal nutritionists to measure total digestible energy for dairy and beef herds.
---
[12:31](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=751s) The Arizona Advantage: Fast Cuttings, Clean Curing, and Avoiding Hay Fires
Joe shifts the discussion to geographic comparison, asking why alfalfa grown in the Arizona desert is considered superior to crops raised in wetter parts of the United States. He asks whether the advantage stems from intrinsic feed quality, raw annual tonnage, or the sheer number of cuttings achievable in a single season.
Trevor explains that while gross tonnage per acre is comparable across regions, the cutting frequency dramatically alters the quality of the hay. In Arizona, farmers yield 9 to 10 tons per acre across 10 to 12 cuttings each year, harvesting every 25 to 30 days. In contrast, other states produce 7 to 8 tons per year on roughly half that many cuttings. When alfalfa is allowed to grow into massive, thick two- or three-ton single harvests, the plant develops woody, fibrous stems and loses its leaf-to-stem ratio. Furthermore, dense cuttings struggle to cure. Packing hay with excess internal moisture creates intense heat and chemical fermentation under baling pressure, which can easily trigger spontaneous hay fires in storage barns.
In Arizona's arid climate, thin cuttings dry and cure evenly without losing their green color or foliage. In wetter, rain-dependent "dryland farming" regions, cut alfalfa sits on damp ground where the bottom layer never sees sunlight, forcing farmers to mechanize two or three passes to flip windrows over. If sudden rainfall catches the cut hay while drying, it rots, bleaches, and sheds its leaves. As Trevor summarizes: “The leaf is the important part of that plant that's where all the nutrition is and a lot of these other places have to flip it two or three times.” Consequently, when regions like Texas or Idaho face either crippling droughts or field-flooding rainstorms that prevent machinery from entering, Arizona steps in as the dependable swing producer: “And when there's too much rain like there's been years where Idaho or Texas and Texas is a huge hit Market I think you have so much rain they cannot get in their fields and they cannot Harvest it so guess what it's almost the same problem as having the drought right you still can't you don't get anything out of your fields and so Arizona fills in that Gap.”
- Arizona farms average 9 to 10 tons of alfalfa per acre per year across 10 to 12 cuttings (harvested every 25 to 30 days). - Humid or colder states average 7 to 8 tons per acre across 5 to 6 cuttings, producing thicker, stemmy hay that cures poorly. - Trapped moisture in densely compressed hay bales causes mold and spontaneous combustion fires. - Cut hay in rain-prone states must be mechanically flipped repeatedly to dry the underside; exposure to rain ruins protein content and color.
---
[15:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=918s) Premium End Markets: Derby Contenders, Dairy Cows, and Pet Horses
Tracy Alloway questions whether appearance and color genuinely matter to livestock, asking if ordinary dairy cows care about the shade of green in the alfalfa hay they consume.
Trevor clarifies that his specific commercial operation serves the high-end equine industry rather than commercial dairy herds. His farm has supplied elite thoroughbreds competing in the Kentucky Derby, as well as ultra-wealthy horse operations in Florida where breeding stock and racing horses are flown internationally on private jets. For horse owners, visual appeal, stem thickness, and dust-free leaf retention command massive premiums. High-performance animals—including racehorses, roping horses, and barrel racers—require peak protein percentages to maintain their stamina and muscle. For casual hobbyists who keep pet horses that are never ridden, hay quality is far less critical.
Turning back to cattle, Trevor explains that while visual appearance is less paramount for cows than for horse owners, feed testing numbers are critical for dairy operations. The digestible nutrient value directly dictates milk yields and butterfat percentages. Hay that lies in a field and gets rained on rapidly loses its soluble sugars and protein, impairing its performance in a dairy ration. For commercial beef cattle, lower-grade, weathered hay is acceptable, but high-producing dairy cows demand tested, high-protein feed. As Trevor explains: “My specific Market is the horse market so people with horses that have anywhere from I mean we've fed horses that have been in the um the Kentucky Derby we sent uh Hey to Florida where there's soup where there's horses that fly on private jets back and forth from other countries for breeding purposes and racing I don't know what they do I don't I'm not much of a horse person but um yes to them it is extremely important and even back to the cattle side yes it's important because that feed value changes and that feed value is extremely important the older the hay gets the lower the feed value goes down that feed value is in direct connection to the quality of milk that the cow produces.”
- Bales Hay Farm supplies top-tier equine operations, including Kentucky Derby racehorses and breeding operations in Florida. - High protein and intact leaves are vital for racing, roping, and barrel racing horses. - Dairy cattle require high laboratory-tested feed value to sustain milk production, whereas beef cattle can utilize coarser, lower-grade roughage. - Rain-damaged hay experiences significant nutrient leaching, reducing feed value for both dairy cattle and performance horses.
---
[17:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=1029s) The Irrigation Network: Canals, Laser-Leveling, and Subsurface Drip
Tracy asks how irrigation actually functions on the farm, recalling Trevor’s earlier mention that his ancestors carved out canal infrastructure. Trevor emphasizes that Arizona currently farms fewer total acres than in decades past while operating at peak historical water efficiency.
His family farms land along the Gila River. Early pioneers surveyed the valley without modern GPS, successfully tracking high points along the valley’s spine so gravity could deliver river water through a master canal network. Trevor dispels the public notion that farmers draw water without restriction. Agricultural water is strictly metered and allocated by the local irrigation district; exceeding an allotment results in immediate shutoff. To irrigate, Trevor orders a scheduled water delivery for a set window of time. The water flows from the main canal into a lateral ditch, which empties into the farm's distribution ditches.
```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Water Distribution Flow on Bales Hay Farm accDescr: Diagram showing how water travels from the Gila River through canals, lateral ditches, and laser-leveled fields.
subgraph District ["Irrigation District Management"] River["Gila River Supply"] --> Canal["Main Valley Canal"] Canal --> Lateral["Lateral Distribution Ditch"] end
subgraph Farm ["On-Farm Gravity Irrigation"] Lateral --> HeadDitch["On-Farm Delivery Ditch"] HeadDitch --> LaserField["Laser-Leveled Field Strips<br/>(120 ft wide x 1/4 mile long)"] LaserField --> Fall["Engineered End Fall<br/>(Even gravity coverage)"] end ```
The farm's fields are precision laser-leveled: completely flat from side to side, engineered with a calibrated slope known as "end fall" running lengthwise. A 100-acre parcel is partitioned into border strips roughly 120 feet wide and a quarter-mile long. When gate valves open, water sheets across the strip with uniform depth, avoiding dry spots or pooling. Trevor also highlights subsurface drip irrigation as a rising trend in Arizona. Subsurface drip pipes bury emitters underground directly into the root zone, virtually eliminating evaporation. While Trevor would love to adopt it, installation costs remain high. He also notes that open evaporation is often overstated in public debates, with agricultural studies showing field evaporative losses at roughly 2% or less.
Tracy interjects with a joke about her own gardening setup, noting she has underground pipelines across two and a half acres that leak continuously: “So maybe I actually already have Subterranean Irrigation in a way.” Trevor laughs and affirms, “You kind of do.”
Trevor sums up the disciplined reality of desert irrigation management: “People like to imagine we're just using as much water as we can we are not at all we get we get cut off if we if we use too much you you can't just do whatever you want so the district manages that water that water goes along uh Farmers like myself I I will order water a specific amount for a time and then we'll go down a lateral ditch that feeds off the canal and that lateral will then either will then carry water to the ditch that connects to my Fields.”
- Early canals were surveyed along the natural spine of the Gila River valley without GPS technology. - Water use is strictly monitored and capped by local irrigation districts; growers order exact allocations on scheduled timers. - Fields are laser-leveled flat crosswise with a gentle longitudinal decline ("end fall"), divided into 120-foot-wide by quarter-mile-long border strips for uniform flood irrigation. - Subsurface drip delivers water directly to the plant root system, though equipment costs remain a significant hurdle. - Research studies demonstrate that surface water evaporation during field irrigation runs at 2% or less.
[20:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=1230s) From Furrows to Laser Leveling: How Irrigation Evolved
Joe Weisenthal turns the conversation to the technological evolution of water management, asking Trevor Bales how agricultural practices on his family’s land have evolved to achieve greater output with significantly less water compared to the methods used by his ancestors. Bales explains that older generations relied on carving furrows throughout their fields—a design he likens to an old washboard. In an open, uneven field, water naturally follows the path of least resistance, rushing down one depression and leaving the rest of the ground bone-dry. The furrow system forced water through parallel trenches so that the low spots retained moisture across the whole field. While ingenious for its time, creating and maintaining furrows was grueling, physically hard on equipment, and difficult to steer in straight lines before the advent of GPS.
The transformative leap arrived with laser leveling and dirt borders—techniques standard across California and Arizona but largely unfamiliar to farmers in rain-fed states. Farmers construct two-foot-tall dirt ridges called borders running from the top to the bottom of the field, segmenting the acreage into contained strips roughly 60 to 120 feet wide by a quarter-mile long, depending on the natural sidefall of the terrain. Precision laser systems (and now GPS) level the ground between these borders so flat that water can sheet evenly across the entire corridor at a uniform depth of two inches or less. Once the water glides smoothly to the bottom end, the irrigator shuts the valve, and the water naturally settles in place without pooling or runoff.
Bales notes that while subsurface drip irrigation is technically the single most water-efficient method available, its economics can be prohibitive. Because drip systems rely heavily on petroleum-based PVC piping, installation costs fluctuate with global oil prices. When oil and plastics are cheap, subsurface drip costs roughly $2,000 per acre, but under current elevated prices, it runs upwards of $3,000 or more per acre—an enormous capital barrier for a 4,000-acre farm. Laser leveling strikes the ideal operational balance between high water efficiency and manageable upfront capital costs.
```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Evolution of Field Irrigation Methods accDescr: Diagram showing the historical progression from furrow irrigation to laser-leveled border basins and capital-intensive drip systems.
subgraph Historical["Historical Method"] F1["Carve Furrows<br/>(Washboard ridges)"] --> F2["Water flows down trenches"] F2 --> F3["Uneven, hard on equipment,<br/>crooked pre-GPS lines"] end
subgraph Modern["Modern Practical Standard"] L1["Laser / GPS Leveling"] --> L2["Construct 2-ft dirt borders<br/>(60–120 ft wide strips)"] L2 --> L3["Sheet flow: 2 inches deep<br/>across quarter-mile run"] L3 --> L4["Zero excess runoff<br/>High water efficiency"] end
subgraph HighTech["High-Cost Alternative"] D1["Subsurface Drip Irrigation"] D1 --> D2["Highest efficiency"] D1 --> D3["$3,000+/acre capital cost<br/>tied to petroleum/PVC prices"] end ```
[24:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=1444s) Waterlogged Sinks, Treated Effluent, and Invasive Salt Cedars
Tracy Alloway asks Bales how salient the looming threat of water scarcity feels on his farm today, whether he has faced actual shortages, and if outside pressure is forcing him to scale back. Bales clarifies that his farm’s geographic position is highly unique: it sits in a low-lying, naturally waterlogged basin saturated with extremely salty water. His operation does not draw from the Colorado River or the Salt River Project (SRP). Instead, their supply relies on natural runoff from Eastern Arizona trickling down the Salt and Gila Rivers to recharge their shallow aquifer, alongside treated municipal effluent purchased from the Phoenix water treatment plant. Because their water consists of municipal effluent and heavy saline runoff, Bales Hay Farm & Ranch is legally prohibited from growing fresh produce, leaving salt-tolerant forage like alfalfa as the ideal crop.
Historically, the city of Phoenix appreciated the arrangement because municipal runoff was viewed as a nuisance that needed disposal; without agricultural pumping, the valley floor would turn into a swamp with the water table standing barely three to four feet beneath the surface. However, technological progress in water treatment and inland desalinization has shifted municipal attitudes. Cities now realize they can clean brackish effluent for domestic use, prompting farmers to worry about what will happen once their century-long agreements expire. Compounding the regional water strain is the salt cedar (tamarisk)—an invasive, non-native tree introduced from Africa or the Middle East. Dense thickets of salt cedar now choke the Gila River corridor, guzzling vast quantities of groundwater and preventing natural river flows. Despite legislative efforts by Arizona State Senator Sine Kerr to eradicate the trees, environmental protections for nesting wildlife like owls and butterflies have stalled mitigation efforts.
- Bales Hay Farm does not use water from the Colorado River or the Salt River Project; it draws from the Gila River basin aquifer and treated Phoenix municipal effluent. - High salinity prevents the land from being used to cultivate fresh produce. - The water table in Bales's low-lying basin sits just three to four feet below ground level in certain areas. - Invasive salt cedar trees consume massive volumes of water along the Gila River, yet eradication campaigns face pushback over wildlife habitat preservation.
[27:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=1644s) Broken Pledges and Desert Sprawl: Who Changed the Water Rules?
When Weisenthal asks whether agricultural water use is inevitably headed for a direct clash with urban and industrial demands, Bales concedes that a confrontation is brewing: “Yes somewhere it is gonna have to give.” Bales points out that urban planners originally promised development would balance out organically: when a developer bought out a farm to build subdivisions, the water right simply transferred from agriculture to residential taps on that identical parcel, creating a net-neutral water transaction.
Instead, Bales argues that regulatory goalposts were moved behind closed doors. City authorities and land developers began constructing thousands of master-planned homes out in arid raw desert, along newly paved highways and against scenic mountainsides where agriculture never existed and no native water was present. By piping water out to raw desert tracts rather than confining housing growth to retiring farmland, developers created entirely new, additive demands on the water system while farms continued to operate on fewer total acres. As Alloway prepares to ask what price or condition would cause him to abandon alfalfa farming altogether, Bales reflects on how the narrative shifted against farmers:
> “Who changed these water rules? I mean if I said the farmers didn't change a rule we've been here farming for over 100 we're farming less Acres than ever but so there were some things that kind of change that'd be interesting to get the full story on that because like yeah there's big housing developments up in these areas that are very arid there's no water there's no farming that ever happened there they just boom let's throw in these several thousand homes and neighborhoods and use a whole bunch of water.”
[30:31](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=1831s) Market Signals, Cotton History, and the Pressure of Suburban Sprawl
Trevor Bales explains that his farming decisions are purely driven by economics rather than personal preference: “I don't grow alfalfa because that's what I want to grow it's that's what the market asks for.” He points out that farming functions just like manufacturing cars; as long as he has soil and water, he will plant whatever pays his bills. He recalls how cotton used to reign supreme under the old saying “cotton is king,” and notes that if textile mills and commodity markets ever swung heavily back in favor of cotton, farmers like him would immediately return to planting it.
When Joe Weisenthal points out that Trevor's farm sits on Bales Road—named after his family—he asks whether encroaching homebuilders are trying to buy up the land at prices that would outcompete alfalfa farming. Trevor clarifies that their farm is currently insulated because it is located eight to ten miles away from the nearest freeway. In Arizona, suburban development strictly follows highway corridors such as Interstate 10, Interstate 17, Loop 202, and Loop 101. However, transportation planners are already mapping out a reliever freeway that could cut through his area. Trevor acknowledges that if they were directly along an interstate corridor, developers would already be knocking on their door, because once freeway access arrives, farmland conversion quickly follows.
[32:26](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=1946s) The Water Debate: Agricultural Efficiency vs. Urban Expansion
```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Desert Agriculture and Water Scarcity accDescr: Flowchart contrasting historical agricultural stability with modern urban pressures and food supply risks.
subgraph FarmingCore["Farming Reality"] F1["Centuries of Desert Farming"] --> F2["Farming Fewer Acres with Record Efficiency"] F2 --> F3["Year-Round Sunlight & Controlled Crop Quality"] end
subgraph UrbanPressures["Urban Encroachment"] U1["Massive City Population Influx"] --> U2["Water Becomes a Contested Political Crisis"] U3["Water-Intensive Tech (Chip Fabs)"] --> U2 end
subgraph FoodSecurity["National Consequences"] U2 -.-> S1["Loss of AZ & CA Central Valley Water"] S1 --> S2["U.S. Relies on Foreign Imports"] S2 --> S3["Crops Sprayed with Heavy Chemicals"] end ```
Asked what the public fundamentally misunderstands about Arizona's water crisis, Trevor pushes back against the narrative that agriculture is draining the state. As Trevor Bales argues: “I guess I said it earlier water was never an issue until the city got as big as it was we're farming that in the state less acres than we've ever farmed or using less water than we've ever used and we're more efficient than we've ever been.” He questions the decision to locate water-intensive industries like semiconductor chip fabrication plants directly in the Arizona desert when they could theoretically be built in wetter regions, whereas the Southwest’s unique climate makes it one of the only places in the country where year-round, high-yield agriculture can operate.
Beyond Arizona, Trevor stresses that California’s Central Valley faces an even more alarming threat. The sheer volume of milk, fruits, and vegetables produced there is vital to the country’s domestic supply. If farmers in California lose their access to irrigation, he warns, American consumers will be forced to depend on foreign imports treated with aggressive chemical pesticides to control insects. For over a century, his family’s farming sustained itself without water emergencies, only becoming a political issue once municipal sprawl accelerated.
- Bales Hay Farm sits roughly 8 to 10 miles from the freeway, protecting it temporarily from suburban subdivision. - Phoenix growth remains tethered to major transit arteries: I-10, I-17, Loop 101, and Loop 202. - Arizona agriculture operates on fewer total acres and with lower per-unit water consumption than at historical peaks.
[34:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=2064s) The “Wild West” of Alfalfa: Booms, Busts, and Unregulated Swings
Just as the interview seems to conclude, Trevor prompts the hosts to ask about the alfalfa market itself, describing it as an unregulated, volatile space akin to the wild west because it lacks public futures contracts like wheat, corn, or barley. For decades, $300 per ton was considered an extraordinary ceiling for high-quality alfalfa hay, with farmers thrilled to receive $285 per ton. However, over the previous two years, aggressive overseas exporters entered the West Coast market—purchasing vast supplies across Washington, Oregon, California, and Arizona—and drove prices past $400, peaking near $460 per ton.
That rapid surge fostered widespread optimism heading into the current season, but demand reversed sharply when exporters abruptly pulled back. Because Bales Hay Farm also buys and harvests alfalfa from neighboring farms to resell into the domestic market, Trevor got caught in the downdraft. In March and April, producers priced hay based on lingering expectations of $330 to $340 per ton. Within just two months, absent exporter bids, local market prices collapsed to roughly $195 per ton—a drop of more than $140 per ton. Trevor emphasizes that without transparent futures markets to anchor value, the alfalfa trade is ruled entirely by shifting psychology and herd perception:
> “It doesn't necessarily matter what's really happening it's what is your perception and what does what do people think is going to happen and so everyone starts making decisions on what they think is going to happen and everyone thought the market was going to stay high and I mean to see it fall over a hundred dollars a ton in a couple months I mean that's that's crazy we need an alfalfa futures market.”
| Timeframe / Condition | Approximate Hay Price (per ton) | Market Dynamics | |:--- |:--- |:--- | | **Historical High Ceiling** | $285 – $300 | Multi-year historical benchmark for top-tier hay | | **Export Boom Peak (2021–2022)** | $400 – $460 | Heavy buying across West Coast ports | | **Spring Pricing (March/April 2023)** | $330 – $340 | Optimistic residual pricing by regional growers | | **Post-Export Bust (Summer 2023)** | ~$195 | Exporters exit, local supply backs up |
[38:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=2292s) Post-Interview Analysis: Weather Predictability and Horse Feed Scrutiny
Reflecting on the discussion, Joe and Tracy marvel at the agricultural technology Trevor uses, particularly laser-leveling fields to optimize irrigation flow down to the fraction of an inch—prompting Tracy to joke about her husband using a laser measure obsessively at home for pictures and terraces. Tracy observes that while growing alfalfa in a desert sounds counterintuitive at first glance, the arid conditions provide an enormous operational advantage for curing and baling hay, since rain ruins the crop once it is cut.
The hosts also weigh the end markets for desert hay. Tracy notes that dairy cattle attract nearly all the climate criticism while wealthy equestrian owners flying in desert-cured hay for competition horses face little public pressure. Joe argues that horses represent a far less vital end market than the nation's dairy and meat supplies, but underscores the interview's broader insight: desert agriculture offers complete environmental predictability. Without the threat of unexpected torrential downpours or mid-season floods, farmers can manage input risks with extreme precision, achieving higher operational efficiency than wetter, less predictable regions can match.
[40:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=2409s) Urban Sprawl vs. Desert Agriculture
Reflecting on the conversation with Trevor Bales, Joe Weisenthal and Tracy Alloway weigh the competing visions for Arizona's future. While it is easy for observers to assume that agriculture made sense historically but must now give way as cities expand and massive semiconductor fabrication plants move into the desert, the conversation brings out the counterargument. Instead of treating urban sprawl as an inevitable force that must displace farming, one could equally question why Phoenix needs to expand outward indefinitely rather than preserving the state's role as a productive agricultural powerhouse. As Joe puts it: “It made sense for a long time, but as the cities developed, to Trevor's point, as we build these semiconductor factories, it does feel like decisions, tough decisions, might need to be made, but on the other hand, like maybe the answer is to keep Arizona an agricultural powerhouse and not continue to spread Phoenix as far as the eye can see.”
Hearing directly from agricultural producers reframes the standard narrative that population influx automatically means farming must shrink. Alloway adds that if water-intensive industrial projects create tension with existing land use, another valid choice would be to locate those facilities elsewhere: “Or move the fabs elsewhere.”
[40:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=2445s) Outro and Resources
Tracy Alloway and Joe Weisenthal wrap up the episode by directing listeners to social media handles, show materials, and community forums. Joe highlights Trevor Bales's educational content on social media, encouraging the audience to see his firsthand demonstrations of desert farming techniques in action.
- **Guest Profile**: Trevor Bales can be found on Instagram at `@baleshay`, where he shares videos detailing day-to-day alfalfa farming in Arizona. - **Hosts**: Tracy Alloway (`@tracyalloway`) and Joe Weisenthal (`@TheStalwart`) on Twitter. - **Producers**: Carmen Rodriguez (`@CarmenArmen`) and Dashel Bennett (`@dashbot`). - **Show Materials & Links**: Full podcast episodes and Bloomberg audio are available via `@podcasts`. Additional *Odd Lots* transcripts, the blog, and the weekly Friday newsletter are hosted at `bloomberg.com/oddlots`. - **Discord Community**: Listeners can discuss episodes 24/7 at `discord.gg/oddlots`, which includes a dedicated water channel for ongoing conversations about resource scarcity and management.
## Notable quotes > [07:35](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=455s) Water and agriculture were never a hot topic in Arizona until Phoenix got to be fourth, fifth, sixth largest city in the country, right? — Trevor Bales
> [40:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8&t=2409s) maybe the answer is to keep Arizona an agricultural powerhouse and not continue to spread Phoenix as far as the eye can see. — Joe Weisenthal
## Mentioned Trevor Bales, Bales Hay Farm & Ranch, Joe Weisenthal, Tracy Alloway, Chase Emerson, Wallace Bales, Alberta Belote, Steve Bales, Belote family, Sine Kerr, Carmen Rodriguez, Dashel Bennett, Salt River Project, Gila River, Colorado River, Odd Lots, CHIPS and Science Act, Kentucky Derby
## Video description Due to a combination of drought, climate change and booming growth, Arizona is facing looming water scarcity. But for all the sprawl and population increase, the overwhelming amount of water used in the state is not consumed by residences, but rather farmers. So naturally, many argue that we should be doing less agriculture in the desert and move the production of cotton, alfalfa and various vegetables towards places with more rain. On this episode, we speak with Trevor Bales, the proprietor of Bales Hay Farm & Ranch in Arizona about his family’s history in the state and why he thinks this dry desert is a great place to grow alfalfa.
See omnystudio.com/listener (https://omnystudio.com/listener) for privacy information.
Bloomberg's Joe Weisenthal and Tracy Alloway analyze the weird patterns, the complex issues and the newest market crazes. Join the conversation every Monday and Thursday for interviews with the most interesting minds in finance, economics and markets.
Subscribe to Bloomberg Podcasts: https://bit.ly/BloombergPodcasts Check out more Odd Lots: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLe4PRejZgr0MuA6M0zkZyy-99-qc87wKV
Get the Odd Lots newsletter via https://www.bloomberg.com/account/newsletters/oddlots And for all things Odd Lots, visit https://www.bloomberg.com/oddlots
Visit our other YouTube channels: Bloomberg Television: https://www.youtube.com/@markets Bloomberg Originals: https://www.youtube.com/bloomberg Quicktake: https://www.youtube.com/@BloombergQuicktake
#Bloomberg #Podcast #OddLots
Visit us: https://www.bloomberg.com/podcasts
Follow Bloomberg Podcasts on Twitter: https://twitter.com/podcasts
For coverage on news, markets and more: http://www.bloomberg.com/video
[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owieQnPYfT8)