Official Derails Stoning of Matthias by Uttering Forbidden Name

psk0812

The execution collapses into disorder because the presiding official cannot enforce the blasphemy statute without repeatedly violating it himself.

AI-assisted summary of stoned for saying jehovah (life of brian) — original source. Check the original for full context.

Source published: 2007-11-11

Key ideas

Spectators treat a capital execution like a sporting event, purchasing tailored assortments of throwing stones and gravel from an on-site vendor. (0:00)
Women attend the forbidden execution by wearing fake beards and attempting to deepen their voices, though domestic slips repeatedly compromise their cover. (0:00)
The condemned man, Matthias, faces death by stoning for blasphemy after complimenting a home-cooked halibut dinner using the sacred name of the Lord. (0:00)
Proceedings collapse into chaos as Matthias openly chants the forbidden name, leading the presiding official to inadvertently utter it himself and invite the mob's wrath. (0:54)

Detailed notes

## Background Published on YouTube by psk0812 on November 11, 2007, this clip presents a scene from Monty Python's Life of Brian. As noted in the description, the comedic excerpt features John Cleese and Graham Chapman, depicting an unfortunate old man about to be stoned for uttering the word Jehovah.

## TL;DR Spectators disguise themselves in false beards and buy throwing stones like sporting snacks in preparation for a public execution. An official reads blasphemy charges against Matthias, who was condemned to death for merely declaring that a halibut supper was good enough for Jehovah. Chaos erupts as an over-eager crowd begins throwing stones prematurely, prompted by Matthias gleefully repeating the sacred name. Attempting to restore order, the exasperated official commands that nobody stone anyone until he blows his whistle, inadvertently breaking his own rule by repeatedly shouting the forbidden word himself.

## Atmosphere & style The scene exudes an absurd, sharply satirical tone that contrasts solemn religious authority with the mundane, cheerful atmosphere of a novelty sporting event. Viewing the sketch feels fast-paced and increasingly chaotic, characterized by deadpan official pronouncements crashing into high-pitched mob disruptions. The humor builds through escalating dramatic irony and slapstick frustration as the presiding official's pompous efforts to maintain procedural control directly lead to his own undoing.

## Bulletin - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=0s) Spectators treat a capital execution like a sporting event, purchasing tailored assortments of throwing stones and gravel from an on-site vendor. - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=0s) Women attend the forbidden execution by wearing fake beards and attempting to deepen their voices, though domestic slips repeatedly compromise their cover. - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=0s) The condemned man, Matthias, faces death by stoning for blasphemy after complimenting a home-cooked halibut dinner using the sacred name of the Lord. - [00:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=54s) Proceedings collapse into chaos as Matthias openly chants the forbidden name, leading the presiding official to inadvertently utter it himself and invite the mob's wrath.

## Key takeaways - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=0s) Stoning executions function as commercialized public spectacles where spectators buy customized ammunition including flat stones, pointed stones, and gravel. - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=0s) Spectators in attendance include women disguised in false beards who attempt to mask their identities to circumvent gender bans on attending executions. - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=0s) Disguised attendees inadvertently jeopardize their cover through slips of the tongue when addressing family members in the crowd. - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=0s) The stone vendor promotes the stoning as high-quality local entertainment because the condemned man is a resident of the area. - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=0s) The presiding official strictly observes bureaucratic ritual, reading the formal condemnation of Matthias, son of Deuteronomy of Gath, from a scroll. - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=0s) Matthias is sentenced to death by the town elders strictly on theological grounds for uttering the sacred name. - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=0s) The capital offense arose from an entirely mundane domestic situation involving praise for a well-cooked halibut supper. - [00:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=54s) The gathered crowd exhibits reflexive religious outrage, crying blasphemy the moment the forbidden word is spoken aloud in defense. - [00:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=54s) The official actively polices the crowd for female attendees, but accepts superficial, gruff vocal denials from the costumed mob. - [00:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=54s) Over-eager spectators break protocol by hurling stones prematurely before the official has formally commenced the execution. - [00:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=54s) When confronted over an illegal premature throw, the crowd turns on the culprit with naturally high-pitched female voices, undermining their disguise. - [00:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=54s) Faced with an absurd death sentence, Matthias openly derides the decree by repeatedly chanting 'Jehovah' to prove his situation cannot get any worse. - [00:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=54s) The mob strictly and blindly enforces blasphemy rules against anyone who speaks the sacred word, striking the official as soon as he repeats it. - [00:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=54s) The official triggers his own targeting while trying to maintain discipline, ordering that no one throw a stone before his whistle even if someone says 'Jehovah.'

## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=0s) Buying Stones and the Trial of Matthias

Spectators arrive at an execution ground to prepare for an afternoon stoning as if buying snacks and novelties at a sporting event. Customers approach a vendor selling throwing stones, requesting an order of two pointed stones, two flat ones, and a packet of gravel. A slip of the tongue gives away the crowd’s true composition when a bystander disguised in a false beard asks, “Could I have a flat one, Mum?” before being quickly shushed and correcting it to “Sorry, Dad.” The stone vendor cheerfully hands over the merchandise, remarking on the entertainment value of the upcoming execution by noting, “Should be a good one this afternoon. Local boy.”

The Jewish official presiding over the proceedings calls forward the condemned man, reading from an official scroll: “Matthias, son of Deuteronomy of Gath.” When Matthias nervously checks whether he is supposed to answer, the official confirms he is, proceeding to announce that Matthias has been found guilty by the town elders of uttering the name of the Lord and is therefore sentenced to be stoned to death as a blasphemer. Matthias attempts a completely bewildered defense, explaining the trivial context of his crime: “Look, I've had a lovely supper, and all I said to my wife was, that piece of halibut was good enough for Jehovah.”

- The crowd purchases a selection of ammunition, including two pointed stones, two flat stones, and a packet of fine gravel for tossing. - Women attend the execution illegally by donning fake beards and attempting to lower their voices, though their cover slips during stone purchases. - Matthias is condemned strictly on religious grounds for speaking the forbidden name while complimenting a home-cooked fish dinner.

[00:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=54s) Premature Pelting and the Forbidden Word

The moment Matthias utters the sacred name in his explanation, the bearded crowd immediately erupts in outraged cries of blasphemy. The presiding official pauses to strictly inspect the gathering, asking, “Are there any women here today?”—receiving low, gruff denials from the costumed crowd. As the official attempts to solemnly invoke his authority to commence the sentence, an over-eager bystander hurls a stone prematurely, striking Matthias. The official angrily interrupts his own decree to berate the mob for jumping the gun: “Oh, lay off! We haven't started yet!” When the official demands to know who threw it, the crowd instinctively turns on the culprit with high-pitched cries of “She did! She did! She did!” forcing the embarrassed offender to apologize and get sent to the back.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Sequence of the Stoning Disruption accDescr: Flowchart showing how repeated utterances of Jehovah lead to the disruption of the stoning. A["Official reads charges to Matthias"] --> B["Matthias explains the halibut supper and says 'Jehovah'"] B --> C["Spectator throws stone prematurely before official start"] C --> D["Official reprimands crowd; Matthias repeats 'Jehovah'"] D --> E["Official warns against saying it, accidentally utters 'Jehovah' himself"] E --> F["Official commands no stoning until whistle, shouting 'Jehovah' again"] ```

Matthias remains entirely unrepentant and questions the logic of the law, insisting that merely pronouncing the word should not count as blasphemy. When the official warns him that his attitude is only making things worse, Matthias fires back, “Making it worse? How could it be worse? Jehovah, Jehovah, Jehovah!” A stray projectile suddenly strikes the official instead of Matthias. Furious, the official rounds on the crowd to demand who threw it, only for a spectator to justify the hit by pointing out, “Well, you did say Jehovah.” Livid at the loss of order, the official attempts to lay down an absolute rule, delivering a stern ultimatum that inadvertently triggers his own downfall: “Now look, no one is to stone anyone until I blow this whistle! Do you understand? Even, and I want to make this absolutely clear, even if they do say Jehovah!”

- Spectators are disciplined for throwing stones before the official signal, revealing high-pitched female voices despite their disguises. - Matthias taunts the absurdity of his execution by deliberately chanting the forbidden name multiple times. - The official inadvertently violates his own strict decree by repeatedly uttering the forbidden name while forbidding others from reacting to it.

## Mentioned Monty Python's Life of Brian, John Cleese, Graham Chapman, Matthias, son of Deuteronomy of Gath, Jehovah, psk0812, YouTube

## Video description clip from monty pythons life of brian, where poor old man is about to be stoned for uttering the word Jehovah. Funny clip with John Cleese and Graham Chapman.

[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI)

中文简报

官员念出禁名致马蒂亚斯石刑现场陷入混乱行刑陷入混乱，因主事官员若不亲自屡次触犯亵渎法令便无法执行该法令。为观看公开行刑，观众们戴上假胡子伪装自己，并像购买观赛零食一样选购投掷用的石块。一名官员宣读了对马蒂亚斯的亵渎罪指控，后者仅仅因声称一顿大比目鱼晚餐配得上耶和华便被判处死刑。随着马蒂亚斯兴高采烈地反复念出这一圣名，按捺不住的人群开始提前掷石，现场陷入混乱。恼火的官员试图维持秩序，下令在他吹哨前任何人不得掷石，却在反复大喊该禁词时无意中打破了自己定下的规矩。观众将死刑执行视作体育赛事，从现场小贩处购买定制搭配的投掷石块与碎石。 (0:00) 女性戴上假胡子并试图压低嗓音参加这场本不准其观看的行刑，但脱口而出的家常话屡屡暴露她们的身份。 (0:00) 死刑犯马蒂亚斯因使用主的圣名夸赞一顿家常大比目鱼晚餐而被控亵渎神明，面临被乱石砸死的刑罚。 (0:00) 随着马蒂亚斯公开高呼禁名，行刑现场彻底失控，导致主事官员也无意中说出该词，并引来了暴民的围攻。 (0:54)

Reading summary

The scene satirizes dogmatic religious enforcement and mob mentality by depicting a capital stoning as a mundane sporting event derailed by trivial blasphemy and farcical procedural rules. Execution as Commercialized Public Spectacle (0:00) The execution grounds operate with the casual atmosphere of an afternoon sporting match, where attendees purchase ammunition tailored to their preferences. A local vendor cheerfully sells merchandise including pointed stones, flat stones, and packets of fine gravel for tossing, treating the upcoming execution of a local resident as prime local entertainment. Public participation is so coveted that individuals break legal restrictions to attend. Women don false beards and disguise their voices to enter the male-only gathering, though their cover slips during stone purchases and spontaneous reactions. Meanwhile, the condemned man, Matthias, son of Deuteronomy of Gath, faces death by stoning based on an elders' decree for merely complimenting a home-cooked halibut dinner with the phrase 'good enough for Jehovah.' Procedural Chaos and Self-Defeating Taboos (0:54) The religious proceeding quickly dissolves into farce due to the crowd's bloodlust and arbitrary procedural requirements. The presiding official repeatedly interrupts his formal decrees to discipline spectators for premature throwing, leading disguised attendees to betray their high-pitched voices by blaming one another before the official signal is given. Matthias highlights the irrationality of the taboo by defiantly chanting the forbidden name, provoking a barrage of projectiles that strikes the presiding official instead. Attempting to regain absolute control over the unruly crowd, the official lays down a strict procedural decree—forbidding anyone from stoning until he blows his whistle, even if someone says 'Jehovah'—thereby uttering the forbidden word himself and triggering his own immediate stoning. The episode demonstrates how rigid verbal taboos and authoritarian legal procedures collapse into absurdity when enforced by an eager, hypocritical mob and officials incapable of upholding their own decrees.

精炼阅读摘要

本剧作片段通过讽刺手法展现了一场因打破宗教语言禁忌而引发的石刑处决，揭示了严苛教条的荒诞性以及公众将暴力私刑视为大众娱乐的狂热与伪善。刑罚现场的市集化与暴力娱乐消费 (0:00) 公开行刑的场地被描绘为类似体育赛事的狂欢集市。现场小贩将处决用石块作为消遣商品兜售，向观众提供不同规格的选择，包括两块尖石、两块扁石以及一包用于投掷的细碎砾石。小贩甚至以受刑者是“本地小伙”为由，向顾客保证下午的处决极具观赏娱乐价值。围观者不仅没有对生命的敬畏，反而将投石杀人当作消遣，体现出群体对体制性暴力的麻木与迎合。荒唐的亵渎指控与虚伪的禁令规约 (0:00) 被告马蒂亚斯（Matthias）所面临的死刑指控建立在极其荒谬的日常语境之上。小镇长老判定其直呼神名构成亵渎罪，而马蒂亚斯在辩解中指出，自己只是在享用完家常晚餐后，向妻子由衷称赞那块比目鱼的味道“好到足以配得上主”。与此同时，宗教法规在执行层面充斥着形式主义与漏洞：现场虽明文禁止女性参与，但大量女性通过佩戴假胡须、刻意粗着嗓子伪装入场；在选购石块口误喊出“妈妈”或争执暴露高亢音色时，官方审查的虚伪性与无力感被展现得淋漓尽致。禁忌词汇的反噬与官僚权威的瓦解 (0:54) 行刑程序因民众的盲目狂热而迅速陷入混乱。急不可耐的围观群众在官方正式指令下达前便违规提前投石，打乱了严肃的法令宣读。面对指控与威胁，马蒂亚斯索性连续高呼禁忌神名以示抗议。主持审判的官员极力维护官僚秩序，严厉勒令众人必须等待其吹哨才能动手，却在重申规则的过程中自身屡次不慎说出该禁忌神名，旋即引来飞石砸身。围观者甚至援引官员违禁的事实来为投石辩解，表明极端僵化的禁条最终在自我指涉中瓦解了执法者自身的权威。该内容呈现出一种强烈的讽刺逻辑：当宗教禁忌与形式主义教条被绝对化时，任何微小的理性辩解都将失效；而试图用严苛规则管制暴民情绪的管理者，最终也会被其所推行的荒诞律法反噬。

Detailed notes — zh

## Background 该视频由 YouTube 频道 psk0812 于 2007 年 11 月 11 日发布。视频内容选自经典喜剧电影《蒙提·派森之布莱恩的一生》（Monty Python's Life of Brian），展现了一名可怜的老人仅因脱口说出“耶和华”（Jehovah）一词而即将面临乱石砸死处决的荒诞搞笑片段，主演包括约翰·克里斯（John Cleese）和格雷厄姆·查普曼（Graham Chapman）。 ## TL;DR 在行刑场外，乔装改扮成男性的妇人们正像逛市集一样挑选投掷用的石块，随后由祭司正式宣读对老人马提亚斯的死刑判决，罪名是他将晚餐的比目鱼形容为“美味到配得上耶和华”。被告在辩解中不断复述该禁忌之名，引发人群骚动并屡遭飞石提前袭击，索性破罐破摔连声高呼圣名。祭司见场面失控，气急败坏地掏出哨子下达绝对规矩，要求在他吹哨前任何人不得掷石，哪怕有人喊出该名字也不行；不料话音刚落，祭司自己也因脱口说出“耶和华”而当场遭到暴民合力砸死。 ## Atmosphere & style 全片充斥着蒙提·派森标志性的英式荒诞讽刺与闹剧色彩，将原本血腥残酷的宗教死刑解构为如同周末集市或体育赛事般轻浮喧闹的狂欢。戴着假胡子的行刑人群与古板教条的祭司之间碰撞出强烈的滑稽感，节奏随着禁忌词汇的不断脱口而急促失控，最终在主事者自食其果的戏剧性反转中达到荒诞高潮，观感极其诙谐辛辣。 ## Bulletin - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=0s) 行刑现场被戏仿为集市嘉年华，围观群众不仅当场购买尖头石与整包碎石作为处决工具，妇女还需佩戴假胡子伪装成男性入场。 - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=0s) 被告马提亚斯因在家中称赞大比目鱼美味到“配得上耶和华（Jehovah）”而被控亵渎神明，判处乱石砸死。 - [01:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=68s) 在必死局面下，被告破罐破摔连呼禁忌之名，迫使祭司介入警告，却引发群体失控。 - [01:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=68s) 主持审判的祭司在严令群众“吹哨前不准投石”时脱口说出禁词“Jehovah”，当场沦为狂热人群用巨石砸杀的替罪目标。 ## Key takeaways - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=0s) 处决现场被商业化与娱乐化，小摊贩向观众兜售不同规格的石块和碎石包。 - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=0s) 女性被宗教规矩禁止参与投石，现场妇女通过戴假胡子伪装成男性混入观刑人群。 - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=0s) 来自迦特的马提亚斯因晚餐一句称赞鱼肉美味的日常琐事，被镇上长老定罪为亵渎者。 - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=0s) 神圣禁忌词“Jehovah”的机械化判定展现了宗教教条对日常表达的极端荒唐限制。 - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=0s) 祭司象征性地询问现场是否有女性，凸显了宗教执法流于表面形式的虚伪性。 - [01:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=68s) 狂热的暴民因过度兴奋而违规提前投石，反映出群众嗜血本能凌驾于宗教程序之上。 - [01:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=68s) 提前投石者推诿责任时暴露女性尖细嗓音，与伪装男性的假象形成滑稽反差。 - [01:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=68s) 马提亚斯在无法脱罪的情况下彻底放弃服从，以连喊“Jehovah”的方式公然嘲弄宗教禁忌。 - [01:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=68s) 狂热人群对于“喊出禁忌词即可砸石”的逻辑执行得极其教条，甚至直接投石砸向主审祭司。 - [01:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=68s) 祭司试图用哨子和严酷规矩维持秩序，却陷入语言禁忌的逻辑陷阱中无法自拔。 - [01:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=68s) 祭司自己在宣布禁令时误说出“Jehovah”，瞬间反噬自身成为盲从暴力的受害者，完成全片最核心的黑色幽默讽刺。 ## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=0s) 乱石处决前的“石头小摊”与宣判罪名在行刑现场的外围，人群正像在集市或观看球赛一样挑选投掷用的石块。一位伪装成男人的妇人走向摊位选购：“Oh, we'll have two hit points and a big flat one.” 旁边的孩子脱口喊道：“Could I have a flat one, Mum?” 母亲立刻紧张地制止，孩子赶紧改口道：“Sorry, Dad.” 摊主麻利地清点并打包石块：“Yeah, all right. Two points, two flats and a packet of gravel.” 随后摊主兴致勃勃地推销道：“Should be a good one this afternoon. Local boy.” 顾客也满意地附和并祝愿彼此玩得开心。另一边，由犹太教祭司（约翰·克里斯饰）主持的审判正正式展开。被绑缚的受审老人（约翰·扬饰）神情茫然。祭司高声质问其身份：“Matthias, son of Deuteronomy of Gath.” 老人困惑地向守卫请示是否该回答，得到肯定后才应诺。祭司随即宣读判决：“You have been found guilty by the elders of the town of uttering the name of our Lord? And so as a blasphemer, you are to be stoned to death.” 老人极力为自己辩解，解释事情纯属日常琐事：“Look, I've had a lovely supper, and all I said to my wife was, that piece of halibut was good enough for Jehovah.” 话音未落，人群瞬间因他再次直呼上帝之名而炸开了锅，纷纷尖叫指责这是亵渎。祭司环视四周戴着假胡子伪装成男性的行刑人群，象征性地问了一句：“Are there any women here today?” 众“男子”粗着嗓子否认后，祭司便准备依法依规主持行刑。 - 围观群众购买的处决工具包含尖头石、扁平石以及一整包碎石粒（gravel）。 - 被告名为来自迦特（Gath）的申命记之子马提亚斯（Matthias, son of Deuteronomy of Gath）。 - 被告获罪的原由仅仅是在晚餐称赞那块大比目鱼（halibut）极其美味，连耶和华（Jehovah）吃了都会满意。 ### [01:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI&t=68s) 混乱的投石现场与啼笑皆非的“规矩” 祭司正准备念出官方授权文书的开头，一块石头便猝不及防地砸中了被告。祭司愤怒地打断仪式，大声呵斥人群：“Oh, lay off! We haven't started yet!” 他严厉盘问是谁扔的石头，人群立刻尖着嗓子互相推诿并指向其中一人：“She did! She did! She did!” 意识到说漏嘴后大家赶紧压低声调。那名提早出手的“妇人”怯生生地道歉：“Sorry, I thought we started.” 祭司恼火地将违规者赶到后排，并无奈地对身边人抱怨总有这种不守规矩的人。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 荒谬的亵渎死刑审判流程 accDescr: 展示马提亚斯因说出禁忌之名受审、反抗辩驳以及祭司自身违规引发的连环砸石过程。 subgraph S1["指控与辩解"] A["因说出禁忌之名受审"] --> B["辩解：比目鱼好吃到配得上 Jehovah"] end subgraph S2["现场失控"] B --> C["人群愤怒骚动，有人违规提前掷石"] C --> D["马提亚斯索性破罐破摔，连喊 Jehovah"] end subgraph S3["荒诞结局"] D --> E["祭司警告他人不准说 Jehovah"] E --> F["祭司自己说出禁名，当场被巨石砸死"] end ``` 回到行刑程序，被告马提亚斯仍旧不服，反驳道：“Look, I don't think it ought to be blasphemy. Just saying Jehovah.” 祭司警告他不要自讨苦吃，马提亚斯却索性破罐破摔，反呛道：“Making it worse? How could it be worse? Jehovah, Jehovah, Jehovah.” 祭司严词警告：“I'm warning you, if you say Jehovah once more—” 话还没说完，一块石头又从人群中飞出精准砸中祭司。祭司暴怒地逼问是谁扔的，掷石者理直气壮地辩解：“Right. Well, you did say Jehovah.” 彻底被激怒的祭司不得不掏出哨子，气急败坏地对手持石块的暴民们重申规矩：“Now look, no one is to stone anyone until I blow this whistle! Do you understand? Even, and I want to make this absolutely clear! Even if they do say Jehovah!” 然而，正是因为祭司自己在严令中又一次喊出了禁忌的名字，愤怒而狂热的人群瞬间将手中的巨石全部砸向了他。 - 祭司立下的绝对行刑规矩：“Now look, no one is to stone anyone until I blow this whistle! Do you understand?” - 被告在面临必死绝境时的反叛心理：“Making it worse? How could it be worse? Jehovah, Jehovah, Jehovah.” - 无论祭司还是普通平民，只要发音带出禁忌词“Jehovah”，就会立刻成为众人投石处决的现行目标。 ## Mentioned 蒙提·派森（Monty Python）, 《布莱恩的一生》（Life of Brian）, 约翰·克里斯（John Cleese）, 格雷厄姆·查普曼（Graham Chapman）, 约翰·扬（John Young）, 马提亚斯（Matthias）, 耶和华（Jehovah） ## Video description clip from monty pythons life of brian, where poor old man is about to be stoned for uttering the word Jehovah. Funny clip with John Cleese and Graham Chapman. [Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI)

Original transcript

[0:00] Mm. Oh, we'll have two hit points and a big flat one. - Could I have a flat one, Mum? - Shh! Sorry, Dad. Yeah, all right. Two points, two flats and a packet of gravel. Back in the gravel. Should be a good one this afternoon. Local boy. Oh, good. Enjoy yourselves. Oh! Matthias, son of Deuteronomy of Gath. Do I say yes? Yes. Yes. You have been found guilty by the elders of the town? of uttering the name of our Lord? And so as a blasphemer, you are to be stoned to death. Look, I've had a lovely supper, and all I said to my wife was, that piece of halibut was good enough for Jehovah. Blasphemy! He said it again! Did you hear him? Are there any women here today? Very well. By virtue of the authority? This did he mean. Oh, lay off! We haven't started yet! Come on! You should have. Who threw that stone? Come on! She did! She did! She did! Sorry, I thought we started. Go to the back. Oh dear. There's always one, isn't there? Now, where were we? Look, I don't think it ought to be blasphemy. Just saying Jehovah. You're not making it worse for yourself. Making it worse? How could it be worse? Jehovah, Jehovah, Jehovah. I'm warning you, if you say Jehovah once more, Right! Who threw that? Thank you. Thank you. Come on! Who's through that? Was it you? Yes? Right. Well, you did say Jehovah. Thomas! Now look, no one! Mr. Stone, anyone? until I blow this whistle! Do you understand? Even, and I want to make this absolutely clear! Even if they do say Jehovah!