Missile Computer Fixes Flight Path by Calculating Where It Isn't
Krasniye
Guidance systems maintain spatial awareness and derive navigational error by continuously subtracting where the weapon isn't from where it is.
AI-assisted summary of The Missile Knows Where it is (Remix) — original source. Check the original for full context.
Source published:
Key ideas
- Missile navigation operates on negative positioning logic, maintaining spatial awareness because the platform knows where it is not. (0:00)
- Directional trajectory adjustments are generated by subtracting where the missile is from where it isn't (or vice versa) to obtain a quantifiable deviation. (0:00)
- Continuous transit shifts spatial states, converting coordinates where the missile wasn't into where it is, while former locations become where it isn't. (0:00)
- When sensory telemetry degrades, the guidance computer overcomes real-time positional ambiguity by combining historical fixes with certainty regarding where it cannot reasonably be. (0:40)
- Guidance error is mathematically synthesized by differentiating the discrepancy between intended and past coordinates from the algebraic sum of prohibited locations and historical positions. (0:40)
Detailed notes
## Background Uploaded to YouTube by Krasniye on March 12, 2017, this video features a remix originally sourced from 4chan that the creator shared simply because they found it 'beautiful.' The uploader's description notes that all ad revenue goes directly to EMG and explicitly encourages viewers to use an ad blocker.
## TL;DR The presentation delineates the core navigational logic of a missile guidance system based on continuous negative positioning: knowing where it is by knowing where it isn't. By calculating the difference between occupied and unoccupied coordinates, the system produces deviations to drive corrective course adjustments. When variations degrade positional telemetry, the guidance computer relies on temporal memory to track where it was alongside parameters of where it cannot reasonably be. It resolves navigational uncertainty by differentiating intended trajectories from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be and where it was to compute guidance error.
## Atmosphere & style The presentation is marked by a rhythmic, deadpan instructional delivery that treats paradoxical linguistic loops with clinical, military-grade seriousness. Its sterile, matter-of-fact narration transforms dizzying subtraction logic into an almost hypnotic technical lecture. The overall experience feels like an uncanny, retro-futuristic training demonstration where rigid mathematical computation collides with absurd epistemological wordplay.
## Bulletin - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LjN3UclYzU&t=0s) Missile navigation operates on negative positioning logic, maintaining spatial awareness because the platform knows where it is not. - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LjN3UclYzU&t=0s) Directional trajectory adjustments are generated by subtracting where the missile is from where it isn't (or vice versa) to obtain a quantifiable deviation. - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LjN3UclYzU&t=0s) Continuous transit shifts spatial states, converting coordinates where the missile wasn't into where it is, while former locations become where it isn't. - [00:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LjN3UclYzU&t=40s) When sensory telemetry degrades, the guidance computer overcomes real-time positional ambiguity by combining historical fixes with certainty regarding where it cannot reasonably be. - [00:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LjN3UclYzU&t=40s) Guidance error is mathematically synthesized by differentiating the discrepancy between intended and past coordinates from the algebraic sum of prohibited locations and historical positions.
## Key takeaways - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LjN3UclYzU&t=0s) The foundational axiom of the navigation system establishes that the missile knows where it is at all times because it knows where it isn't. - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LjN3UclYzU&t=0s) Quantifiable deviations are produced by subtracting the missile's occupied state from its unoccupied state, or vice versa. - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LjN3UclYzU&t=0s) Directional steering adjustments during flight depend on deviation values derived from negative spatial comparison. - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LjN3UclYzU&t=0s) Navigating through space continuously updates spatial identity, transforming a coordinate where the missile wasn't into the coordinate where it is. - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LjN3UclYzU&t=0s) Prior physical coordinates ('where it was') automatically convert into negative reference points ('where it isn't') upon arrival at a new location. - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LjN3UclYzU&t=0s) System variation is formally defined as the exact numerical discrepancy between the missile's current coordinate and the position it previously did not occupy. - [00:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LjN3UclYzU&t=40s) Temporal trajectory tracking requires the guidance apparatus to retain an active historical record of where the missile was. - [00:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LjN3UclYzU&t=40s) External disturbances and uncompensated variations can degrade telemetry, temporarily leaving the missile uncertain of its immediate coordinates. - [00:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LjN3UclYzU&t=40s) Despite telemetry noise, the system operates within bounded certainty regarding where it cannot reasonably be, paired with known prior fixes. - [00:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LjN3UclYzU&t=40s) The guidance computer reconciles positional ambiguity by comparing theoretical destination points ('where it should be') with historical origins ('where it was'). - [00:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LjN3UclYzU&t=40s) Operational error is generated by differentiating this comparative positional value from the algebraic sum of prohibited coordinates and previous locations. - [00:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LjN3UclYzU&t=40s) The resulting error computation provides the definitive corrective metric required to steer the missile along its planned trajectory.
## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LjN3UclYzU&t=0s) Principles of Differential Deviation and State Transitions
The instructional audio presents the foundational operational logic governing missile navigation with rhythmic, deadpan precision. At the heart of the system is an epistemological paradox rooted in subtraction: the weapon platform maintains total situational awareness not through direct observation alone, but through continuous negative positioning. The narrator explains this core axiom plainly: “The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't.” By systematically subtracting where it is from where it isn't—or conversely, subtracting where it isn't from where it is—the navigational logic establishes a quantifiable difference or deviation.
```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Basic Deviation and Positional Transition accDescr: Diagram illustrating how the missile identifies deviation and updates its positional states. subgraph States["Positional Reference Points"] IS["Where it is"] ISNT["Where it isn't"] WAS["Where it was"] WASNT["Where it wasn't"] end subgraph Process["Guidance Adjustment"] DEV["Obtain Difference / Deviation"] TRANS["Shift to Position Where It Isn't"] UPDATE["Arrival: Position It Wasn't Becomes Position It Is"] end IS <-->|"Subtracted from / compared"| ISNT ISNT --> DEV DEV --> TRANS TRANS --> WASNT WASNT --> UPDATE UPDATE --> WAS ```
This mathematical deviation provides the directional drive necessary to adjust the weapon's trajectory in flight. Through corrective steering, the missile travels toward a location where it previously was not, altering its ongoing spatial identity relative to its journey. As the voiceover delineates: “Consequently, the position where it is is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was is now the position that it isn't.” When a mismatch arises between the location currently occupied and the target destination previously unoccupied, the tracking apparatus registers a measurable discrepancy designated as a variation.
- The primary computational mechanism relies on subtracting the negative state ("where it isn't") from the active state ("where it is") or vice versa to produce a deviation. - Traversing space permanently shifts the missile's states: arrival at a former "wasn't" position instantly converts that coordinate into its current "is," while rendering its former "was" into its present "isn't." - A system variation is formally defined as the exact numerical difference between the missile's real-time position and the coordinate where it wasn't.
[00:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LjN3UclYzU&t=40s) The Guidance Computer Scenario and Error Derivation
Navigational continuity requires more than an appraisal of present coordinates; the guidance computer must retain historical trajectory data to reconcile external disturbances. As the voiceover stresses, knowing current discrepancies is incomplete without temporal memory: “However, the missile must also know where it was.” When an uncompensated variation alters or degrades the sensory telemetry collected during flight, the missile experiences operational ambiguity, leaving it momentarily uncertain of its exact location in space.
```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: Guidance Computer Error Computation accDescr: Flowchart showing how historical coordinates and algebraic sums generate guidance error. subgraph Inputs["Telemetry Data"] SHOULD["Where it should be"] WAS["Where it was"] SHOULDNT["Where it shouldn't be"] end subgraph Computation["Differential Synthesis"] SUB["Subtract Where It Should Be from Where It Was"] ALG["Algebraic Sum of Where It Shouldn't Be and Where It Was"] ERR["Guidance Error"] end SHOULD --> SUB WAS --> SUB SHOULDNT --> ALG WAS --> ALG SUB -->|"Differentiated from"| ERR ALG -->|"Differentiated from"| ERR ```
To resolve this ambiguity, the computer leverages the parameters of which it remains confident: it maintains a reasonable certainty of where it cannot be, paired with an exact record of its prior fix. The system executes a comparative calculation by subtracting its intended theoretical coordinate from its historical origin coordinate, or vice versa. The narrator encapsulates this final analytical synthesis by noting that the computer operates “by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be and where it was, which is called error.” Through this differentiation, the guidance subsystem resolves positional noise into an actionable error metric to govern further flight corrections.
- External variations introduce telemetry degradation, depriving the missile of absolute certainty regarding its real-time coordinates. - Despite positional uncertainty, the navigation system maintains certainty over where it is not, bounded "within reason," alongside a confirmed log of where it was. - The system generates its final error reading by contrasting the difference between intended location ("where it should be") and origin ("where it was") against the algebraic sum of its prohibited coordinates ("where it shouldn't be") and its past coordinate ("where it was").
## Notable quotes > [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LjN3UclYzU&t=0s) The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't.
## Mentioned 4chan, EMG, Krasniye
## Video description Taken from 4chan, uploaded here because it's beautiful.
All ad revenue from this video goes directly to EMG so I encourage you to use adblock.
[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LjN3UclYzU)