Technology Connextras
Standard electric stoves deliver heat to cookware faster than gas ranges because open flames waste substantial thermal energy around the pot while polluting indoor air.
AI-assisted summary of Gas stoves aren't really that fast - even standard electric is faster! — original source. Check the original for full context.
Source published:
Key ideas
- Empirical testing shows standard radiant electric cooktops generally match or outperform gas burners in boiling speed, with a 1,200-watt electric element boiling 8 cups of water in 16 minutes and 45 seconds compared to 19 minutes on a standard gas burner. (34:25)
- Indoor air quality monitoring during gas cooking revealed severe combustion spikes, with ambient CO2 climbing from an 818 ppm baseline to 1,560 ppm during an ordinary dinner preparation in a sealed home. (29:44)
- Gas ranges vent significant convective heat around cookware, causing pot handles to become scalding hot, raising kitchen ambient temperatures in summer, and preventing escaping water vapor from condensing into visible steam until a rolling boil is reached. (10:52)
- Choosing a standard radiant double-oven range over an induction model saved roughly $1,600, while avoiding cookware incompatibilities and acoustic buzzing from bonded base plates. (62:27)
Detailed notes
## Background Published on YouTube by Technology Connextras on January 30, 2023, the video features the succinct description "Really!" followed by a detailed timeline of chapter timestamps. It documents the creator's side-by-side empirical testing comparing boiling speed, indoor air quality impacts, and daily usability between his former gas stove and a replacement radiant electric range.
## TL;DR Challenging the widespread belief that gas cooking is inherently faster and better, the host conducts head-to-head boiling and preheating tests between his gas stove and a newly installed radiant electric double-oven range. The results show that electric resistance cooking transfers heat into cookware more efficiently than open flames, outperforming standard gas burners across almost all vessel sizes while narrowly trailing only an oversized high-output gas burner. In addition to boiling speeds, the host tracks indoor air quality, showing that gas combustion rapidly spiked indoor CO2 levels past 1,500 ppm, whereas electric operation produced zero emissions. While addressing radiant electric's thermal lag, he demonstrates that simple technique adjustments, cooler cookware handles, lower ambient kitchen heat, and an easy-to-clean glass surface make electric a practical and compelling choice.
## Atmosphere & style The presentation is casual, unpretentious, and methodically nerdy, driven by a self-deprecating Midwestern charm that keeps deep dives into electrical duty cycles and thermal physics engaging. Watching the host pace across his apartment while checking CO2 monitors and timing whistling kettles feels like sitting in on a candid, evidence-based mythbusting experiment with a practical friend. The narrative maintains a thoughtful, open-minded arc that avoids ideological lecturing, focusing instead on relatable kitchen realities and the quiet satisfaction of debunking persistent conventional wisdom.
## Bulletin - [34:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=2065s) Empirical testing shows standard radiant electric cooktops generally match or outperform gas burners in boiling speed, with a 1,200-watt electric element boiling 8 cups of water in 16 minutes and 45 seconds compared to 19 minutes on a standard gas burner. - [29:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=1784s) Indoor air quality monitoring during gas cooking revealed severe combustion spikes, with ambient CO2 climbing from an 818 ppm baseline to 1,560 ppm during an ordinary dinner preparation in a sealed home. - [10:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=652s) Gas ranges vent significant convective heat around cookware, causing pot handles to become scalding hot, raising kitchen ambient temperatures in summer, and preventing escaping water vapor from condensing into visible steam until a rolling boil is reached. - [01:02:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=3747s) Choosing a standard radiant double-oven range over an induction model saved roughly $1,600, while avoiding cookware incompatibilities and acoustic buzzing from bonded base plates.
## Key takeaways - [39:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=2397s) The persistent perception that electric cooktops are slower than gas stems largely from sensory psychology: gas provides immediate acoustic roar and visible flame, whereas radiant electric heats silently. - [34:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=2065s) Across multiple water boiling trials, gas held an advantage only when using a specialized high-output quick-boil burner on a large 4-quart pot (16:47 vs. 18:00); on regular-sized burners, radiant electric was consistently faster. - [34:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=2065s) Electric ovens with dual-element rapid preheat reach 400°F faster than standard gas ovens, challenging the assumption that gas preheating is superior. - [08:41](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=521s) Combustion byproducts from gas stoves elevate indoor CO2 well above normal baselines, and standard over-the-range microwave exhaust hoods often fail to adequately vent emissions from front burners. - [45:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=2712s) The primary operational drawback of radiant electric cooktops is thermal inertia, which prevents instant temperature drops when dialing down heat. - [45:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=2712s) Thermal inertia on electric cooktops is easily managed by lifting cookware off the glass surface to immediately halt conductive heat transfer, or by lowering settings early before reaching a boil. - [45:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=2712s) Thermal mass in ceramic glass and heating elements enables effective duty-cycle pulsing, smoothing out power fluctuations to maintain a stable, gentle simmer. - [53:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=3225s) A standard 9,000 BTU gas burner produces roughly the equivalent of 3,000 watts of thermal energy, matching the top electric element, but wastes most of it into the kitchen air through combustion blow-by. - [56:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=3370s) Electric cooktops prevent pot handles from overheating and eliminate hot flue gas blasts to the cook's face and hands, making close stirring and sensory monitoring far more comfortable. - [50:53](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=3053s) Traditional flat-bottom electric and induction cooktops do not support authentic round-bottomed wok cooking without specialized, costly equipment. - [50:53](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=3053s) Relying on gas stoves for blackout resilience is increasingly complicated by modern electronic safety valves and ignition lockouts, whereas portable camping burners or vehicle-to-load EV power offer cleaner backup alternatives. - [01:00:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=3606s) Smooth glass-ceramic surfaces provide flat, functional kitchen prep space when cool and are substantially easier to clean than heavy, stained gas grates, provided spills are not repeatedly baked into the glass. - [01:04:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=3885s) Pairing an affordable radiant electric range with a $60 to $70 portable induction burner provides instant temperature control and emergency flexibility without the steep price tag of a full induction appliance.
## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=0s) Rethinking the Gas vs. Electric Debate
Opening the video with a self-deprecating joke about entering the cultural discourse, the host clarifies that his aim is neither to force everyone to throw out their gas stoves nor to pretend gas appliances lack advantages for specific cooking styles. Rather, his objective is to challenge a widely held cooking assumption by demonstrating that standard radiant electric stoves are actually faster at transferring heat into cookware than gas burners. This realization first occurred to him during his previous kettle video, when taking a red whistling kettle to his parents' radiant cooktop revealed it boiled water significantly faster than his own gas range at home.
While acknowledging that electric elements suffer from slower responsiveness when adjusting heat downward, he notes that induction technology already resolves that issue. However, he deliberately chose a conventional radiant model over induction for practical and financial reasons. He prepares to present head-to-head empirical boiling tests to prove that the raw speed advantage of electric cooktops is genuine, regardless of common cooking lore.
“I totally get that this is going to sound like make believe, but I'm here with some tests to show you that this is indeed the case.”
[01:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=92s) Indoor Air Quality and the Push to Switch
The decision to swap out appliances originated from persistent concerns regarding combustion byproducts trapped indoors. The building is tightly sealed, meaning that merely existing inside alongside his cat causes ambient baseline carbon dioxide ($\text{CO}_2$) to hover around 750 to 800 parts per million (PPM), roughly doubling background outdoor levels due to minimal fresh air exchange. Although studies outlining the health risks of indoor gas combustion date back to the 1980s, the host previously relied on workarounds like cracking windows and retrofitting bathroom exhaust fans with one-hour countdown timers whenever he cooked.
The final push came while visiting his parents over Christmas. Preparing Cream of Wheat porridge (Farina) and batches of white rice on their radiant electric cooktop, he discovered that his cooking instincts were completely intact; dialing back the heat early prevented boil-overs entirely. Furthermore, boiling both items took noticeably less time than on his gas range. Because his home features a 200-amp electrical panel positioned directly below the kitchen, running a dedicated 240-volt circuit took him only about three hours. He recognizes this setup was unusually favorable, capped the household gas supply pipe, and plugged in his replacement unit.
“I'm not out here to tell you you should get rid of your gas stove right now because that's difficult and expensive... but I do want to hopefully convince you that even a standard electric stove is fine.”
[05:35](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=335s) Selecting a Double-Oven Range and Passing on Induction
In North American households, cooking setups rarely feature separated wall ovens and cooktops; the standard configuration is an integrated freestanding range. The host prioritized a specific layout: a double-oven range where the typical lower pan storage drawer is replaced by a full-sized roasting oven, positioning a compact, slender oven cavity directly beneath the cooking surface at waist height. This upper cavity warms faster, conserves energy, and accommodates the vast majority of everyday single-person baking tasks.
Securing that specific double-oven configuration alongside an induction cooktop would have effectively doubled the total purchase price of the appliance. Despite induction technology having matured decades ago without inherently prohibitive component costs, market segmenting pushes North American induction double-oven units into an extreme luxury tier. Consequently, he opted for a radiant glass top paired with the dual oven layout.
“Mainly I just want that skinny oven at the top because it's a more convenient height to use, and I don't need a full oven almost ever.”
```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Stove Selection Decision accDescr: Decision flow showing why the host picked a radiant double-oven range instead of an induction model.
subgraph Priorities["Appliance Priorities"] A["Double-Oven Range Configuration"] B["Compact upper cavity at convenient height"] A --> B end
subgraph Options["Market Assessment"] C["Induction Cooktop Double Oven"] D["Radiant Electric Double Oven"] end
B --> C B --> D
C -->|"Double the purchase price"| E["Rejected: Excessive premium"] D -->|"Affordable & meets cooking needs"| F["Selected for installation"] ```
[07:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=435s) Establishing the Boiling Speed Test
To benchmark heating performance before removing the gas unit, the host set up water-boiling trials across several household pots and kettles. Although water temperature was not gauged with a dedicated probe, he flushed the household plumbing until the tap water ran at a cold, stable underground temperature to maintain consistent starting baselines across trials.
While boiling water does not cover every culinary technique, it isolates the fundamental physical objective of a cooktop: delivering thermal energy into cookware and liquid as rapidly as possible. Filming these tests side-by-side with timing logs allows for a direct comparison of energy transfer between fuel types.
“The whole point of a stove is to get heat energy into cookware and thus into food, so I think it's about the most fair test that you can do.”
[08:41](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=521s) Tracking Carbon Dioxide as an Emission Proxy
For the on-camera test, the host places four quarts (one gallon) of tap water into a large IKEA stockpot on the highest-output burner of the gas stove. Simultaneously, an indoor air quality monitor tracks ambient $\text{CO}_2$ levels throughout the run. While sustained levels exceeding 1,000 PPM impair cognitive function, ambient $\text{CO}_2$ serves here primarily as a visible proxy for dangerous, unmonitored combustion byproducts such as nitrogen dioxide ($\text{NO}_2$) and ultrafine combustion particulate matter.
Before igniting the burner, the over-the-range microwave exhaust fan is set to high. However, poor duct routing severely compromises its airflow to the outdoors. The baseline readings and initial conditions at ignition are:
- Starting water volume: 4 quarts (in an IKEA stockpot) - Initial ambient indoor $\text{CO}_2$ reading: 818 PPM - Exhaust status: Over-the-range microwave vent active on high - Anticipated time to reach a rolling boil on gas: ~16 minutes
“When $\text{CO}_2$ goes up quite a lot because of using the stove, then we know that those worst things are also in the air, and it just gives a good idea of how hard it is to get all that stuff out of the living space.”
[10:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=652s) Testing the Ikea Pot on Gas and Observing the Disappearing Steam
Alec continues timing the four quarts of water in the Ikea pot on his old gas stove's large "quick boil" front burner. In a previous run using a different pot with a wider base on that same burner, it took 16 minutes and 30 seconds to reach a boil. By contrast, running the Ikea pot on the back left burner—which was also marketed as a quick boil burner—was vastly slower, taking over half an hour just to bring four cups of water to a boil. Alec reflects on how this challenges popular assumptions:
> “Yeah, this idea that gas stoves are really fast is increasingly sounding like BS to me.”
He is performing these baselines to compare against his incoming replacement: a standard radiant glass-ceramic cooktop, rather than an induction range.
Alec monitors indoor air quality throughout the run. To keep conditions controlled, he disables the building HVAC system so no forced air circulates, leaving only the range extractor hood running. The $\text{CO}_2$ meter sits roughly 30 feet (about 9 meters) away, around the corner in the living room. As the test passes the 10-minute mark, the reading rises from an initial baseline of 818 ppm up to 845 ppm, and then rapidly spikes to 960 ppm. While walking back and forth carries a slight draft of kitchen air into the living room, he stresses that the monitor is far away; directly in the kitchen, levels would likely register around 1,500 to 1,600 ppm.
Around 14 minutes in, active bubbling appears. Defining boiling as the point where the surface is intensely disturbed, Alec stops the clock at roughly 16 minutes and 47 seconds—just 17 seconds longer than the wide-base pot, illustrating that water and energy behave predictably regardless of vessel shape.
Turning off the gas burner reveals a striking physical phenomenon: steam only becomes visible *after* the flame is extinguished. When Alec reignites the burner, the billowing plume vanished instantly.
> “The exhaust gases from the burner are so hot that they are able to keep the water vapor that's escaping from condensing into mist so it's visible as steam.”
This demonstrates the sheer volume of wasted convective energy rushing up past the sides of cookware on a gas range. After completing the run, the remote $\text{CO}_2$ monitor continues climbing, registering 1,160 ppm, then 1,205 ppm, and eventually surpassing 1,245 ppm as the combustion byproducts disperse through the apartment.
```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Gas Stove Convective Heat Waste and Steam Suppression accDescr: Diagram showing how hot gas exhaust bypasses the pot and prevents water vapor from condensing into visible steam.
subgraph Combustion["Gas Burner Operation"] Burner["High-Output Gas Flame"] --> FlameHeat["Direct Conductive Heat to Pan Base"] Burner --> HotExhaust["Massive Hot Exhaust Gas Flow"] end
subgraph PotInteraction["Pot & Water Vapor"] FlameHeat --> BoilingWater["Boiling Water Releases Vapor"] HotExhaust --> BypassSides["Exhaust Rushes Up Around Pot Sides"] BoilingWater --> Evaporation["Escaping Vapor Stream"] end
subgraph VisualEffect["Visual Result"] BypassSides --> Overheating["Superheats Ambient Air Above Pot"] Evaporation --> Overheating Overheating -->|"Prevents condensation"| InvisibleSteam["Steam Stays Invisible / Disappears"] Burner -.->|"Turn Flame OFF"| DropsTemp["Ambient Air Rapidly Cools"] DropsTemp -->|"Condenses into mist"| VisibleSteam["Dense Plume of Steam Appears"] end ```
[17:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=1030s) The New Radiant Electric Stove: Setup and Burner Limiting
Alec reveals his new cooking appliance: a standard radiant glass-ceramic cooktop (electric resistance under glass), not induction. To evaluate its capabilities, he stages a simultaneous two-pot boil test: - **Right front burner:** Four quarts (nearly four liters) of water in the large Ikea pot. - **Left front burner:** Eight cups (two quarts) of water in the smaller pot.
Because this test solely boils clean water and produces no combustion byproducts, smoke, or aerosolized grease, Alec leaves the range extractor hood off completely. Prior tests had already confirmed that running the electric range leaves indoor $\text{CO}_2$ levels untouched.
The right element has the highest power rating on the cooktop, though the smaller pot on the left sits on an element running at approximately two kilowatts. Alec notes that while the glowing heating coils appear bright magenta-pink on camera due to digital sensors capturing intense infrared emissions, they look deep red to the naked eye.
The benchmark targets from the gas stove are: - **16 minutes, 47 seconds** for the 4-quart pot on the maximum-output gas burner. - **19 minutes flat** for the 8-cup pot on the gas stove's normal-output burner.
Early into the boil, the right electric element cycles off. Alec explains that this is a built-in safety feature typical of modern glass-ceramic ranges, which use internal temperature limiters to prevent the cooktop from overheating when running continuously at maximum output.
- Cooktop type: Standard electric radiant glass-ceramic (non-induction). - Gas benchmark for large pot (4 quarts): 16:47 (high-output quick-boil burner). - Gas benchmark for small pot (8 cups): 19:00 (normal-output burner). - Left radiant burner output: Approximately 2 kW. - $\text{CO}_2$ production during electric boiling: 0 ppm increase.
[20:47](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=1247s) Side-by-Side Boiling: Usability and Final Timings
As the timers pass seven minutes, wisps of vapor emerge over the electric elements. Alec notes an underappreciated ergonomic advantage of electric cooking over gas: the lack of convective exhaust. On high-powered gas stoves, an intense plume of superheated combustion air constantly blasts upward around cookware, making it uncomfortable to stir food with short utensils, evaluate aromas, or visually monitor simmering. On the radiant cooktop, Alec demonstrates that he can comfortably hold his hand right above and next to the pots, even though the elements are slightly wider than the cookware bases.
During the test, heat radiating from the cooktop forces Alec to reposition his filming smartphones to keep them from overheating.
At the 14-minute mark, the smaller pot approaches a vigorous boil. Alec calls it at 14 minutes and 45 seconds (rounding up to 15:00): - **Small pot result:** 14:45 on electric versus 19:00 on the gas stove's standard burner—over four minutes faster.
Meanwhile, the 4-quart pot on the cycling high-power element continues building toward a boil. On gas, the flames had engulfed the sides of the pan to reach a rolling boil at 16:47. On the electric range, the water reaches full boil at approximately 18 minutes and 30 seconds. Despite suffering thermal throttling cycles and being slightly undersized for the element, the electric burner finished less than two minutes behind the gas stove's most aggressive burner. Alec concludes:
> “Electric stoves are not slow, folks.”
[25:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=1551s) Kettle Test on the Moderate Gas Burner
Testing the tea kettle on the gas stove turns into an experiment on power versus ventilation. Rather than using the massive high-output front burner, the kettle is placed on the more moderate back-left burner—what the host considers the only "normal" burner on that range, though it still has decent power. To keep things standardized, exactly one liter of water (measured using a pre-filled bottle) is poured in. Boiling is defined by a crisp, objective audio cue: the moment the kettle starts to whistle, it is officially done. The kettle's whistle is oriented away from the phone camera, and the extractor fan built into the over-the-range microwave is set to its highest speed.
Because the back-left burner sits more directly underneath the microwave hood than the front burners do, it should theoretically benefit from better exhaust capture. Still, the host remains skeptical about the fan's real-world capability. Once the kettle whistles, he shuts off the extractor fan entirely to observe what the lingering combustion gases do to the kitchen's air quality. While admitting that turning off ventilation over an open flame is normally a bad idea, he paces back and forth across the kitchen to stir up the air and overcome any sensor latency. The CO2 readings steadily climb from a baseline of around 818 ppm up to 1,220 ppm before stabilizing.
- Test volume: ~1 liter of water. - Metric for completion: The first audible whistle from the kettle. - Starting indoor CO2 baseline: ~818 ppm. - Stabilized CO2 reading after test: 1,220 ppm. - Takeaway on hood geometry: The rear burner exhaust is largely captured by the overhead microwave hood, but front burners completely miss the intake canopy.
---
[29:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=1784s) Real-World CO2 Spikes from Everyday Cooking
Reflecting on the ambient measurements during post-production editing, the host admits that real cooking produces far more alarming spikes than a single isolated boiling test. After completing the stove tests that evening, he cooked an ordinary dinner using the gas oven and at least one stovetop burner. That single cooking session drove indoor CO2 levels all the way to 1,560 ppm—nearly double his home's typical baseline.
Even aggressive remediation did little to solve the problem quickly. Running the kitchen extractor fan and two separate bathroom exhaust fans continuously for a full hour only brought the CO2 down to 1,110 ppm. The host emphasizes that the only true way to flush combustion byproducts like CO2 out of a sealed home is to open windows and dump the conditioned indoor air, which subsequently requires reheating or recooling the house from scratch.
> “Whatever I did ended up peaking indoor CO2 at 1560. That is like just holy yikes, that's pretty much double the typical baseline level.”
---
[30:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=1857s) Kettle Test on the Smooth-Top Electric Range
The scene shifts to the new radiant electric range to run the identical one-liter kettle test. Before switching anything on, the host touches the bare glass cooktop with his hand to prove the surface and internal elements are stone-cold, noting that the hot surface warning light is off. However, touching the surface introduces finger grease, prompting an immediate cleaning interlude. Maintaining a smooth ceramic-glass cooktop requires diligence; burning baked-on grease into the glass causes lasting cosmetic damage. While specialized products like Cerama Bryte exist, ordinary glass cleaner handles day-to-day wipe-downs.
```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Electric Kettle Test Configuration accDescr: Diagram illustrating how the multi-zone electric burner interacts with the kettle base. subgraph Burner["Triple-Zone Radiant Burner"] Inner["Inner 6-inch Zone"] Mid["Middle Zone Active"] Outer["Outer Ring Inactive"] end Inner --> Mid Mid -->|"Matches kettle diameter (~8-9 in)"| Base["Kettle Base"] Base -->|"Direct contact + radiant heat"| Water["1 Liter of Water"] Water -->|"Reaches boil in 7:15"| Whistle["Audible Whistle"] ```
The kettle is centered on the front multi-zone burner set to its middle diameter. The 6-inch inner section alone would be slightly too narrow for the kettle's footprint, whereas the middle zone matches the kettle's base diameter almost perfectly. Even though some stray radiant energy escapes around the perimeter, the vast majority is transferred cleanly upward into the steel vessel. The whistling kettle clocks in at exactly 7 minutes and 15 seconds.
- Cooktop maintenance rule: Keep the surface free of grease before heating to avoid baking in residue. - Burner setting: Middle ring of the multi-zone element. - Test result: Whistle sounded at 7 minutes, 15 seconds.
---
[34:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=2065s) Off-Camera Data: Preheating Ovens and Boiling Water
Moving beyond the filmed trials, the host breaks down the comprehensive data gathered across multiple days of testing ovens and cooktops. First, in terms of oven preheating to 400°F, the old gas range required 8 minutes and 59 seconds. The new electric range beat it handily: both of its cavity ovens hit 400°F in under 8 minutes. The electric range achieves this through a "rapid preheat" function that activates both the top broil element and the bottom bake element simultaneously, destroying the long-held myth that gas ovens preheat faster than electric ones.
On the cooktop side, the large 4-quart (1-gallon) Ikea pot was the only scenario where the gas range held an edge—and only on its specialized high-output burner, which clocked 16 minutes and 47 seconds versus the electric range’s best time of 18 minutes. When that same 4-quart pot was placed on the gas stove's back-left burner, it languished for 35 minutes before boiling. In every other test, radiant electric proved strictly faster. For an 8-cup pot of water, the normal front-left gas burner took 19 minutes. On the electric stove, even the weakest, smallest 1,200-watt rear element boiled that same volume in 16 minutes and 45 seconds—beating the standard gas burner by 2 minutes and 15 seconds.
| Test Scenario | Gas Stove Time | Radiant Electric Stove Time | Notes / Details | |:--- |:--- |:--- |:--- | | **Oven Preheat to 400°F** | 8 min 59 sec | < 8 min (both cavities) | Electric uses dual elements (Rapid Preheat) | | **4 Quarts Water (Large Burner)** | 16 min 47 sec | 18 min 00 sec | Sole victory for gas (Quick Boil burner only) | | **4 Quarts Water (Back-Left Burner)** | 35 min 00 sec | — | Gas burner heavily throttled by smaller size | | **8 Cups Water (Standard Burner)** | ~19–20 min | 14 min 20 sec (medium zone) | Best electric run was 14:20; secondary run 15:00 | | **8 Cups Water (Smallest Burner)** | — | 16 min 45 sec | Electric 1,200 W element beats standard gas burner |
> “The slowest burner on this electric stove is faster than what I would call a normal burner on a gas stove.”
---
[38:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=2282s) Element Wattage and Duty-Cycle Power Throttling
A peculiar quirk emerged during head-to-head testing between the two rear electric burners. On paper, the back-left burner is rated 100 watts higher (1,300 W) than the back-right burner (1,200 W). However, when identical Ikea pots were raced simultaneously, the 1,200 W back-right burner boiled in 13 minutes, while the 1,300 W back-left burner took 15 minutes.
The discrepancy comes down to internal duty cycling. The stove aggressively cycles certain burners on and off even when turned to maximum. The host deduces that this thermal throttling serves as an engineering safeguard against overloading a home's electrical panel. Summing the stove's maximum surface wattages reveals an immense electrical draw:
- Front burners: 3,000 W + 3,000 W - Rear burners: 1,300 W + 1,200 W - Total cooktop capacity alone: 8,500 Watts
Supplied on a typical 50-amp, 240-volt circuit, the absolute ceiling before tripping the breaker is 12 kilowatts (12,000 watts). If an operator turns on all four cooktop burners simultaneously alongside both oven elements, the total demand would easily exceed 50 amps. Staggering element duty cycles keeps the range from pulling peak current for more than a few minutes at a time, protecting household breakers from tripping during intensive cooking sessions.
[39:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=2397s) Why Electric Stoves Feel Slower Than Gas
Even with the cooktop’s internal power limitations throttling the largest 3,000-watt burner down to an effective 2,000 watts, empirical testing shows that the bog-standard radiant electric stove remains almost as fast as the giant gas burner and noticeably faster in virtually every other comparative scenario. Yet despite the hard data, electric stoves suffer from a persistent reputation of being agonizingly sluggish. Even the host admits that whenever he turns on an electric cooktop, his instinctive reaction is still to dread that boiling or heating will take forever.
He attributes this perception primarily to sensory psychology. When firing up a gas burner, the user experiences immediate acoustic and visual feedback: the rapid *tick-tick-tick* of the spark igniter gives way to a roaring, visible blue flame. On an electric stove—whether conventional radiant or induction—the user twists the dial and hears nothing more than a faint hum. On radiant glass-ceramic units, a dull red glow emerges after a few seconds, but there is no sound and no leaping flame to signal high energy output. Because human brains equate sensory drama with power, an electric stove feels inert even when it is actively dumping more net heat into a pot than an equivalent gas flame.
> “So just by numbers the electric stove, the bog standard electric stove, is faster than the gas stove.”
[41:47](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=2507s) Re-evaluating the Stovetop Kettle Data
Turning to the stovetop kettle tests, performance varies across burners due to geometry and heating element sizing. On the electric range's lower-wattage rear burners, bringing the kettle to a boil took 10 minutes and 54 seconds on the back-left burner, and 10 minutes and 7 seconds on the back-right. By comparison, the old gas stove boiled the same kettle in approximately 8 minutes on its back-left burner. Some seasonal ambient variation factored into this difference, as the gas test had been performed during warmer weather when tap water was not as cold as winter supply water.
However, when moving to the electric stove’s front-left dual-ring burner on its medium setting, the electric cooktop surged ahead, boiling the kettle in 7 minutes and 15 seconds. The host deliberately skipped testing the kettle on the stove's largest front-right "mega" burner because heat overflow had proved hazardous in the past; running a modest kettle over that massive gas or electric ring allowed excess heat to bleed up around the sides, leaving the handle scorching and unsafe to grip. Ultimately, stovetop kettle arguments are largely moot because standalone plug-in electric kettles outperform both gas and electric ranges.
> “There's no reason to boil water in a kettle on a stove; electric kettle remains faster than this stove no matter what, just because there's losses involved with transferring heat from the burner to the kettle to the water.”
- **Electric Back-Left Burner:** 10:54 to boil - **Electric Back-Right Burner:** 10:07 to boil - **Gas Back-Left Burner:** ~8:00 to boil (warmer seasonal baseline) - **Electric Front-Left (Medium setting):** 7:15 to boil
[43:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=2603s) Context: Cooking Habits and U.S. Appliance Demographics
Before evaluating the broader trade-offs between fuel sources, two contextual qualifiers set the baseline. First, culinary complexity dictates how much a cooktop's nuances actually matter. For someone who rarely cooks elaborate multi-course meals from scratch—relying instead on stir-fried vegetables and pre-prepared groceries from Trader Joe's—the exacting requirements of high-end culinary arts do not reflect daily reality.
Second, popular discourse often treats gas cooking as universal, yet federal energy data reveals that only 38 percent of American homes actually possess a gas stove. With induction adoption still hovering in the low single digits, approximately 58 percent of households across the United States rely on traditional electric resistance coil or radiant glass-ceramic ranges every day. For the vast majority of people, cooking on an electric range is already standard practice.
> “For those that are worried about how awful it would be to live with one, most of us are already doing it and we are fine.”
- **U.S. Gas Stove Adoption:** ~38% of homes - **U.S. Traditional Electric Adoption:** ~58% of homes (majority market share) - **U.S. Induction Adoption:** Minimal market penetration
[45:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=2712s) Thermal Inertia: The Big Disadvantage and How to Overcome It
The single biggest operational disadvantage of a conventional electric stove is thermal inertia. Gas stoves provide instantaneous, square-wave thermal modulation: a flame transitions from maximum heat to zero heat the split second the valve is closed, even if the knob itself exhibits stepped or non-linear control. In contrast, radiant electric and coil cooktops must heat up the physical mass of the resistance element and the ceramic glass sheet above it. When switched to low, the element continues to radiate accumulated heat, producing a parabolic curve where temperatures keep climbing before slowly plateauing and declining.
```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Thermal Response Comparison accDescr: Flowchart contrasting the immediate response of gas stoves with the lagging curve of electric cooktops caused by thermal mass.
subgraph GasResponse["Gas Stove Response"] G1["Knob Adjusted"] --> G2["Instant Flame Adjustment"] G2 --> G3["Immediate Heat Change"] end
subgraph ElectricResponse["Radiant Electric Response"] E1["Knob Adjusted"] --> E2["Thermal Mass Lag"] E2 --> E3["Element & Glass Slow to Cool/Heat"] E3 --> E4["Gradual Temperature Curve"] end ```
Managing this lag requires anticipating heat transfer. When bringing liquids like Cream of Wheat to a boil with the intention of simmering, the cook must dial the heat down to medium or low at the first sight of perimeter bubbling rather than waiting for a rolling boil. If a pot is on the verge of boiling over, the fix requires no technical mastery: simply lift the cookware a couple of inches off the glass surface. The moment physical contact is broken, conducted thermal transfer ceases instantly, allowing the liquid to settle while the cook places it on an adjacent cool ring or trivet.
Furthermore, thermal inertia is the very property that makes conventional electric duty-cycling functional. Radiant cooktops regulate intermediate temperatures by cycling the heating element on and off via pulse-width modulation (such as 30 seconds energized followed by 3 seconds off). Without the dampening effect of the heavy glass and element thermal mass, that pulsing power would wildly fluctuate the pan temperature. The stored thermal mass smooths out those electrical pulses, maintaining a steady, consistent simmer across the bottom of the pan.
> “If you have something on an electric stove that is about to boil over or is getting too hot and you need to get heat away from it, pick it up; that's all you have to do.”
[50:53](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=3053s) The Wok Problem and Using Gas During Power Outages
Before moving fully into the merits of electric cooking, Alec addresses a limitation brought up frequently in online discussions: cookware compatibility, specifically cooking with a traditional round-bottomed wok. While specialized induction wok units do exist nowadays, they remain quite expensive, and conventional flat electric ranges simply do not accommodate or heat a wok properly. Alec admits that he has never really used a wok himself or learned proper wok technique, but he refuses to dismiss the concern out of hand, acknowledging that for many people, especially for cultural reasons, it is an essential cooking method that flat-out will not work on standard electric.
Beyond cookware geometry, Alec circles back to a classic gas stove feature that would cause viewers to complain if left unmentioned: operational capability during a power outage. Growing up, his family relied on that trick several times, simply striking a match to light the burners when the electricity failed. However, he questions how reliable modern gas stoves are in this scenario. He recounts that his brother owned a newer gas stove with an electronic safety feature: after even a momentary power interruption, the display demanded the user verify all burners were turned off before pressing start. Because it was equipped with an electric safety solenoid valve that shuts off the gas supply, it may well fail to deliver gas during a true blackout.
Assuming a standard stove without electric shutoff interlocks, being able to cook through a blackout is undeniably useful. Yet Alec argues against letting that single edge case dictate your daily appliance choices. For true emergency resilience, far more practical alternatives exist, ranging from inexpensive propane camping stoves with small gas bottles to portable plug-in induction burners paired with modern backup power. Alec highlights his own setup: thanks to his electric vehicle and its vehicle-to-load (V2L) adapter, he has no need for a noisy fossil-fuel generator. As long as his car carries a usable charge, he can run a portable electric burner, microwave, or refrigerator directly from the car's battery.
- “I almost forgot this advantage of a gas stove and people would be really mad if I didn't bring it up and that is they work during power outages and uh in my past in my childhood that is a thing that we did a few times just light them with a match and it works however I'm not sure how many new stoves will work without power.” - “I'm not going to ever have a generator because so long as my car has some useful charge I can just plug a little burner into it plug the microwave into it uh the fridge freezer whatever I need to and use my car for that purpose...” - Modern gas ranges with electronic safety lockouts may cut fuel completely until an electronic reset sequence is completed, rendering match-lighting ineffective without grid power.
---
[53:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=3225s) Waste Heat and Summer Kitchen Misery
Switching over to the affirmative case for switching to electric, Alec notes the immediate environmental payoff of ditching combustion in his studio space: after exhaustive cooking trials, indoor CO2 levels remained completely flat. Because his gas furnace vents properly outdoors and nothing else inside produces carbon dioxide except his own breathing, removing the unvented gas cooktop eliminated the indoor air pollution source entirely. Beyond air quality, the biggest day-to-day improvement comes in thermal comfort during hot weather.
Cooking in a kitchen during the summer using a gas stove—or worse, a gas oven—is miserable. Reviewing thermal camera footage recorded during his tea kettle experiments, Alec demonstrates that vast plumes of heat simply spill around the cookware rather than soaking into it. The small 9,000 BTU burner he tested churns out roughly the thermal equivalent of 3,000 watts, which happens to match the absolute highest-output element on his electric stove. In other words, the electric stove’s maximum setting only puts out as much total heat as a relatively modest gas burner, yet it delivers comparable or superior cooking speeds because the gas flame is notoriously inefficient at transferring fuel energy into the pan.
This problem is severely magnified in gas ovens. Because gas ovens burn fuel inside the cavity, they require an open exhaust vent—typically positioned directly underneath the rear control console—to continuously spew scorching combustion gases straight into the kitchen. An electric oven cavity, by contrast, requires no exhaust flue for fuel byproducts, allowing manufacturers to insulate the entire enclosure tightly. Preheating an electric oven dumps far less heat into the home than a gas unit, making warm-weather baking and cooking dramatically more tolerable.
```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Heat path comparison between gas and electric cooking accDescr: Diagram illustrating how gas cooking loses substantial heat to the kitchen air while electric transfers energy directly.
subgraph Gas["Gas Combustion Range"] GB["Gas Burner / Oven"] -->|"Open flame / exhaust"| CW1["Cookware / Cavity"] GB -->|"Combustion blow-by"| WasteAir["Surrounding Kitchen Air (Excess Heat & Exhaust)"] end
subgraph Electric["Electric Radiant / Induction"] EB["Electric Element"] -->|"Direct contact / magnetic field"| CW2["Cookware / Insulated Cavity"] EB -.->|"Minimal ambient leakage"| Ambient["Slight Room Warmth"] end ```
- “Indoor CO2 levels did they stayed flat because there's nothing emitting CO2 in the building other than me.” - “Gas stoves are just so bad at getting the heat energy from the fuel they combust into the cookware that a lot of it goes around the cookware ends up in your home and in the summer that sucks.” - A standard 9,000 BTU/hr gas burner releases roughly 2.6 to 3.0 kW of raw thermal power into the room, matching the maximum draw of a large electric cooktop element, but most of that gas energy bypasses the vessel completely.
---
[56:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=3370s) Hot Handles, Searing Hands, and the Cooking Experience
The spillover of superheated exhaust gas around cookware creates immediate ergonomic hazards. Alec demonstrates this using an inexpensive saucepan from Walmart that features a hollow metal handle design. On a gas stove, the rising combustion plume catches in the handle cavity and channels directly along its length, turning the handle scalding hot within minutes even on a low simmer burner. Cooking something as basic as a pot of baked beans requires an oven mitt just to touch the handle, whereas on an electric cooktop, the same saucepan handle remains cool to the bare hand.
This blow-by heat also ruins delicate tasks like making Cream of Wheat, which requires continuous stirring at a simmer. On a gas stove, stirring with an ordinary dining spoon forces the cook's hand to sit directly in the rushing slipstream of hot combustion exhaust, causing painful burning that Alec had long assumed was an unavoidable part of cooking. On an electric range, little to no ambient heat curls around the pan perimeter, allowing comfortable bare-handed stirring.
Furthermore, leaning over a gas pan blasts the cook’s face with hot flue gases. This air curtain disperses food aromas, making it harder to smell subtle culinary changes, while also singeing facial hair and presenting an open-flame fire risk. The rushing exhaust even alters basic visual feedback: on gas, dry hot gases prevent moisture rising off a simmering pot from condensing into visible steam until the boil is violent. On electric, because the surrounding air is cooler and undisturbed, water vapor condenses into visible steam well before a rolling boil, giving a clearer visual indicator of temperature progression.
- “When you use these pots on a gas range this gets too hot to touch virtually any anything you're doing uh even just using that little simmer burner to heat up like some baked beans you cannot touch this with bare hands you need a uh something like an oven mitt to use it to actually hold it.” - “With the gas stove you cannot see water vapor coming up from water as it gets close to a boil all those exhaust gases going around the pot prevent the water vapor from condensing and turning into visible steam whereas on an electric stove because you don't have that huge amount of gas going around the pot you can see that...” - “I have been completely disillusioned from gas stoves as being so much better...”
---
[01:00:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=3606s) Burner Noise, Usable Counter Space, and Maintenance
Alec wraps up his operational comparisons by addressing acoustics and ergonomics. On an electric stove, the kitchen remains peaceful; the only sounds produced are the actual food sizzling, bubbling, or coming to a boil. Gas burners produce a continuous hiss and roar from the rushing flame. While Alec concedes that flame roar can serve as a handy auditory cue for throttle level—making burner noise a functional draw—the overall sensory calm of electric is an unheralded perk.
The physical layout of radiant and smooth glass cooktops delivers another major kitchen upgrade: functional counter space. When a radiant electric or induction glass surface is cool and not actively cooking, it forms a continuous, flat glass expanse that can double as extra prep space or a staging surface for groceries and utensils. In contrast, gas stoves are capped with heavy, uneven cast-iron or stamped-metal grates and burner caps that collect grease, suffer persistent discoloration, and cannot support small items or double as prep surfaces. Cleaning those intricate metal grates is famously tedious, whereas wiping down a smooth ceramic-glass radiant cooktop requires nothing more than a quick pass with a sponge.
- “This is a small thing but like on an electric stove the noise is the food cooking so if you start to hear some boiling sounds or the searing those sizzling that's all you hear whereas with the gas stove you also have to deal with the noise of the flame.” - “You know what's really cool about a conventional radiant cooktop it's a big flat surface and when you're not using it to cook you can use it as a work surface for something else.” - Gas range grates inevitably suffer from baked-on grease, discoloration, and uneven profiles, making them difficult to sanitize compared to the continuous, wipe-clean slab of a glass electric cooktop.
[01:01:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=3685s) Ceramic Cooktop Maintenance and Cleaning Realities
Addressing common complaints about radiant glass-ceramic cooktops, the host acknowledges that the cooking surface gets intensely hot, which can cause spilled oils to burn into the glass and discolor if neglected. However, keeping the surface in pristine condition simply requires regular care. To illustrate, he points to his parents' radiant stove, which still looks immaculate despite being fifteen years old because they routinely clean it with Cerama Bryte, marred only by a single scratch that appeared a year or two ago.
The biggest pitfall people encounter is letting splattered oil sit on the cooktop and then trapping it beneath a hot pot during the next cooking session, which bakes the residue into the glass. Even when that happens, the resulting marks can usually be buffed out without significant trouble. As the host explains: “I think people just like the biggest thing is if you cook something that is splattering oil you need to clean the cooktop before you use it again because if you trap that oil underneath the pot and then turn it on it will leave a mark so that's the big thing but you can get that out just by buffing I don't think it's that big of a deal.”
- Glass-ceramic radiant surfaces suffer discoloration when cooking oils are allowed to burn onto the surface repeatedly. - Regular maintenance using dedicated cleaners like Cerama Bryte prevents permanent stains and keeps decade-old appliances looking near-new.
---
[01:02:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=3747s) Why I Didn't Go Induction: Cost, Cookware, and Noise
Addressing why he chose a conventional radiant glass-top range rather than full induction, the host jokingly admits his background plays a significant part: “mainly I'm a tortured midwesterner who doesn't need the best of the best and is allergic to spending a lot of money on something like a basic kitchen appliance.” Specifically, he wanted a double-oven configuration. Getting a double oven with an induction cooktop would have cost roughly $3,000, whereas the radiant cooktop equivalent was about $1,400. The only induction model available quickly was a Samsung unit featuring an unconventional door design, so paying double the price did not make financial or practical sense.
Beyond the initial purchase price, two other major hurdles factored into the decision: cookware incompatibility and acoustic annoyance. Because induction adoption in the United States remains relatively nascent, much of the host's existing kitchenware—including several skillets, saucepans, and a vegetable steamer—lacks magnetic bases and cannot function on an induction hob. Furthermore, the induction-compatible cookware he already owned (primarily an IKEA set) produced an irritating, resonant buzz on induction burners. While his tea kettle runs practically silent, the bonded magnetic base plates on the pots vibrate loudly against the alternating magnetic field, creating a grating experience he did not want to endure daily.
```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Reasons for Choosing Radiant Electric Over Induction Range accDescr: Flowchart illustrating the financial, cookware, acoustic, and reliability factors leading to the selection of a radiant electric range over induction.
subgraph Costs ["Appliance Cost (Double Oven)"] A["Radiant Electric Range: ~$1,400"] B["Induction Range: ~$3,000"] end
subgraph Cookware ["Cookware Issues"] C["Existing Non-Magnetic Pots/Pans"] D["Bonded Bases Buzz and Resonate"] end
subgraph Hardware ["Appliance Flexibility"] E["$60-$70 Portable Induction Cooktop"] F["Frees flat glass range surface for multipurpose use"] end
B -.->|"More than double the price"| A C --> A D --> A E --> F F --> A ```
- A double-oven induction range costs roughly $3,000, compared to $1,400 for a radiant model. - Cookware compatibility remains a hurdle in the US market; only a fraction of the host's collection (an IKEA set and a kettle) worked on induction. - Many induction-ready pots with bonded disc bottoms generate loud, unpleasant acoustic buzzing when vibrating under high-frequency electromagnetic fields.
---
[01:04:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=3885s) The Portable Induction Workaround and Reliability Concerns
The host highlights an accessible compromise that eliminates the need for an expensive induction range: standalone plug-in induction burners. Because a glass-ceramic radiant cooktop provides a completely flat, durable work surface, a user can place a portable unit directly on top of an unheated burner beneath the existing range vent hood. Costing only $60 to $70, these portable units make spending an extra $1,500 on an all-in-one induction range feel unjustified. The host notes: “I'm a midwesterner I can't justify that that's awful.”
Reliability and reparability also raise valid concerns. With combined range-and-oven appliances standard in American kitchens, an electronic fault or blown burner module in an induction cooktop risks turning into an expensive, complicated repair or an early appliance replacement. In terms of sheer performance, the host tested a portable burner against a large 4-quart pot of water and brought it to a boil in approximately 19 minutes—nearly matching the speed of the radiant stove’s most powerful burner. For cooks who occasionally need instant temperature throttling or advanced temperature-control techniques, an inexpensive plug-in unit delivers those benefits without replacing an entire suite of pots and pans.
- Standalone portable induction cooktops retail for approximately $60 to $70 and store easily when not in use. - Placing a portable unit directly on top of a cold glass range allows cooking under the existing exhaust hood. - In boil-time tests with a 4-quart pot, a standard plug-in induction burner completed the task in roughly 19 minutes, matching the top radiant burner. - Repairing complex electronic driver boards inside an induction range can be substantially more difficult and costly than maintaining radiant heating elements.
---
[01:06:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=4008s) Conclusion: Time to Break Up with Gas Stoves
Reflecting on the extended testing session and his coffee-fueled presentation, the host emphasizes that his goal is not to shame people who currently own and enjoy gas stoves. Instead, he urges home cooks to critically evaluate the drawbacks they have long treated as unavoidable facts of kitchen life. Escaping excessive ambient kitchen heat, handling pot handles without burning one's hands, and enjoying a cooktop that wipes clean in seconds are massive quality-of-life benefits that standard radiant electric stoves already provide.
While losing the instant visual flame control of gas requires a slight adjustment, the everyday convenience of electric surfaces often outweighs that trade-off, especially when supplemented by a portable induction plate when precise heat modulation is required. Delivering his final verdict on domestic cooking tech, the host summarizes: “I do think it's time we consider breaking up with our gas stoves folks because we have the technology.”
- Radiant electric cooktops keep kitchen ambient temperatures significantly lower than uncontained gas flames. - Cookware handles remain cooler on electric cooktops because heat is not allowed to spill around the exterior base of the vessel. - A flat glass-ceramic cooktop is substantially faster and less cumbersome to wipe down than heavy iron gas grates and burner wells.
## Notable quotes > [01:06:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=4008s) I do think it's time we consider breaking up with our gas stoves folks because we have the technology. — Alec
> [45:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=2712s) If you have something on an electric stove that is about to boil over or is getting too hot and you need to get heat away from it, pick it up; that's all you have to do. — Alec
> [53:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y&t=3225s) Gas stoves are just so bad at getting the heat energy from the fuel they combust into the cookware that a lot of it goes around the cookware ends up in your home and in the summer that sucks. — Alec
## Mentioned Technology Connextras, Cerama Bryte, IKEA, Samsung, Trader Joe's, Walmart, Cream of Wheat
## Video description Really!
00:00 Intro 01:32 Backstory 07:15 Testing Procedure 08:41 A note on CO2 and why I'm measuring it 10:02 Ikea pot, 4 quarts - large gas burner 17:10 Same pot, new stove 25:50 Kettle, gas stove 29:44 Real-world CO2 spikes from cooking 30:57 Kettle, Electric stove 34:25 Going over data from off-camera tests 40:36 Why does electric feel slower? 41:47 Right, the kettle! 43:23 Advantages/Disadvantages of gas vs. electric 45:12 Electric stove's big disadvantage (and how to overcome it) 51:25 Power outages 53:45 The many advantages of electric you may not have considered 1:02:27 Why I didn't go induction
[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y)