Food Waste: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)

LastWeekTonight

AI-assisted summary of Food Waste: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO) — original source. Check the original for full context.

Source published: 2015-07-20

Key ideas

Up to 40% of all food produced in the United States goes uneaten, amounting to $165 billion in discarded food annually and an increase of roughly 50% since the 1970s. (0:04)
Decomposing food in landfills releases substantial amounts of methane, a greenhouse gas over 20 times more potent than carbon dioxide, while nearly 50 million Americans face food insecurity. (3:19)
Except for infant formula, the federal government does not mandate expiration dates, and the Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act shields good-faith donors from civil and criminal liability. (10:48)
Legislation aimed at extending permanent food donation tax deductions to small businesses (H.R. 644) was completely stripped and rewritten in the Senate into a customs and trade bill. (12:49)

Detailed notes

## Background Published on YouTube by the official LastWeekTonight channel on July 20, 2015, this segment features host John Oliver examining the massive scale of food waste in the United States. According to the show's description, producers, retailers, and consumers discard tons of food, prompting Oliver's exploration of the shocking volume of edible goods that never get eaten.

## TL;DR Up to 40 percent of food produced in the United States goes uneaten, squandering $165 billion annually and releasing potent landfill methane while nearly 50 million Americans live in food-insecure households. John Oliver explains that this crisis is fueled by retail overstocking, harsh cosmetic standards that leave blemished produce to rot in fields, and consumer confusion over unregulated expiration and sell-by dates. He dismantles the widespread myth that donating food carries litigation risks, citing the protections of the Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act, while detailing the logistical costs and congressional maneuvers that gutted tax deductions for small business donors under H.R. 644. Ultimately, Oliver argues that addressing the crisis requires structural tax relief alongside cultural shifts, such as embracing imperfect produce and ignoring arbitrary date stamps.

## Atmosphere & style The segment balances John Oliver’s trademark exasperated wit and energetic sarcasm with sobering investigative reporting on poverty and environmental damage. High-energy comedic riffs on over-the-top fast-food marketing smoothly transition into genuine outrage over food-insecure families and massive agricultural waste dumps in California. Watching the piece feels like an eye-opening and fast-paced indictment of institutional absurdity, culminating in an extravagant patriotic parody ad that leaves the audience laughing while confronting uncomfortable realities about modern consumption.

## Bulletin - [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=4s) Up to 40% of all food produced in the United States goes uneaten, amounting to $165 billion in discarded food annually and an increase of roughly 50% since the 1970s. - [03:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=199s) Decomposing food in landfills releases substantial amounts of methane, a greenhouse gas over 20 times more potent than carbon dioxide, while nearly 50 million Americans face food insecurity. - [10:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=648s) Except for infant formula, the federal government does not mandate expiration dates, and the Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act shields good-faith donors from civil and criminal liability. - [12:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=769s) Legislation aimed at extending permanent food donation tax deductions to small businesses (H.R. 644) was completely stripped and rewritten in the Senate into a customs and trade bill.

## Key takeaways - [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=4s) American food culture and chain advertising heavily push excessive portions and overconsumption. - [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=4s) Americans discard roughly 20 pounds of food per person each month, enough annually to fill 730 football stadiums. - [03:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=199s) The massive scale of food waste coexists with widespread domestic food insecurity, affecting nearly 50 million Americans in 2013. - [03:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=199s) Discarded food squanders vast amounts of agricultural labor, fuel, and scarce irrigation water. - [03:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=199s) Organic waste breaking down anaerobically in landfills generates massive volumes of potent methane gas. - [03:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=199s) The average American household throws away 15% to 25% of the groceries it purchases. - [06:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=381s) Supermarkets deliberately overstock produce displays to combat consumer hesitation to purchase solitary or low-inventory items. - [06:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=381s) Stringent USDA grading criteria and supermarket cosmetic standards force growers to leave tons of edible produce to rot in fields. - [09:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=565s) Roughly 91% of consumers have discarded food past its printed date under the false assumption that it indicates safety rather than manufacturer-estimated peak freshness. - [10:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=648s) With the sole exception of baby formula, the federal government does not require food date labels, leaving nine states with no dating regulations at all. - [10:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=648s) Grocery stores frequently refuse to donate surplus food due to an unfounded fear of litigation, despite zero recorded cases of food donors being sued. - [10:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=648s) The Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act provides comprehensive civil and criminal liability protection for good-faith food donations. - [12:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=769s) Small businesses and farms often discard surplus food because processing, packing, and transporting it to charities without permanent tax incentives is cost-prohibitive. - [12:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=769s) H.R. 644 originally sought to make food donation tax deductions permanent for all businesses before being stripped and repurposed into an unrelated trade enforcement bill by the Senate. - [16:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=963s) Tackling food waste requires consumers to accept cosmetically imperfect produce, rethink expiration date interpretations, and support tax parity for small-business food donations.

## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=4s) America's Food Culture and the Massive Scale of Food Waste

John Oliver begins by announcing that the evening's main story focuses on food—or "the afterlife," as plants and animals might describe it. America’s cultural affection for food is impossible to escape on television, from endless promotions like IHOP's all-you-can-eat pancakes, Golden Corral’s all-you-can-eat wings, and Red Lobster’s annual endless shrimp event, to chain-restaurant commercials that Oliver jokes are essentially saying: "let food replace your sadness stuff riblets in that hole in your heart." Patriotism and excessive food marketing are thoroughly intertwined, exemplified by an ad for Carl's Jr. and Hardee's featuring the "Most American Thickburger"—a cheeseburger piled with a split hot dog and potato chips, held by model Samantha Hoops in a hot tub on a pickup truck driven by a bull rider on an aircraft carrier under the Statue of Liberty. Oliver dubs the burger "the new Confederate flag."

Behind the indulgence lies a troubling counter-reality: the enormous volume of food that is produced but discarded. Citing a study by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Oliver explains that up to 40% of all food produced in the United States goes uneaten. Between farmers, distributors, retailers, and end consumers, the nation discards more than a third of its entire food supply, an amount that has risen by about 50% since the 1970s. As Oliver quips about the current trajectory: “At this rate, in 40 years, when you order pizza from Papa John's, they'll just deliver it straight to the nearest dumpster, as they should.” Footage from an agricultural disposal site in California’s Salinas Valley drives home the visual shock, showing massive dumps overflowing with crisp loose organic lettuce, spinach, kale, and broccoli.

- Up to 40% of all food produced in the United States is never consumed. - Americans discard $165 billion worth of food each year. - This waste amounts to roughly 20 pounds of discarded food per person every month. - Annually, discarded American food is enough to fill 730 football stadiums. - The volume of food thrown out by Americans has expanded by roughly 50% since the 1970s.

[03:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=199s) Food Insecurity, Environmental Fallout, and Household Financial Waste

The diversion of edible produce from farm to landfill carries severe human, ecological, and economic costs. First and foremost is the human toll: in 2013, nearly 50 million Americans lived in food-insecure households, struggling at points throughout the year to put meals on the table. A news clip shows an emotional mother describing going hungry so her children can eat: “It’s hard. I’ll go without food before my kids will. Budget’s down to the penny, and it’s just not enough.” Oliver emphasizes the glaring paradox: “It is crazy that that is happening in a country with 730 football stadiums full of uneaten food. It's insane.”

Discarded food also wastes all the human labor, fuel, and natural resources required to cultivate it. In California, where extreme drought conditions left the state shriveled, valuable irrigation water was pumped into produce destined only to serve as "a garnish for landfills." Once in those dumps, decomposing food poses a major atmospheric threat. Aggregated organic matter breaks down anaerobically without oxygen, producing methane—a greenhouse gas over 20 times more potent than carbon dioxide at trapping heat in the atmosphere. Oliver illustrates the point: “When we dump food into a landfill, we're essentially throwing a trash blanket over a flatulent food man and Dutch ovening the entire planet.” For viewers unconcerned with social or ecological welfare, Oliver points to household economics: the average American household wastes between 15% and 25% of the groceries it purchases, which is the equivalent of buying four bags of groceries, dropping one on the pavement in the parking lot, and simply leaving it behind.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: The Impacts of Discarding Edible Food accDescr: Diagram mapping the social, environmental, and financial impacts of discarding edible food.

Waste["40% of Food Discarded Annually"]

subgraph Impacts["Consequences"] Human["Human Cost: ~50M Food-Insecure Americans (2013)"] Resources["Wasted Resources: Labor, Energy & Agricultural Water"] Climate["Climate Threat: Anaerobic Breakdown & Methane Gas"] Household["Household Cost: 15%–25% of Purchased Food Lost"] end

Waste --> Human Waste --> Resources Waste --> Climate Waste --> Household ```

[06:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=381s) Supermarket Overstocking and Cosmetic Rejections in Produce

Oliver acknowledges the convenience of accessible, cheap food in America—defending even obscure variations like Cap'n Crunch's Oops! All Berries—but notes that food waste is driven heavily by retail practices and consumer psychology. Supermarkets and farm stands routinely overstock displays because shoppers avoid the lone remaining item on a shelf, assuming that solitary goods must be defective. A small farmstand operator observes that a single leftover bunch of chard will sit untouched for an hour, whereas a brimming display of 30 bunches will prompt customers to buy 25 of them on impulse.

A far larger volume of waste occurs before produce even leaves the orchard. Retailers enforce cosmetic standards so stringent that imperfect produce is left to rot where it grows. A farmer is shown walking through an orchard carpeted with abandoned, edible peaches dropped by pickers. These cosmetic expectations are formalised in United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) grading categories: a flawless "U.S. No. 1" peach commands full price, whereas a slightly marred "U.S. No. 2" peach can lose two-thirds of its wholesale value despite identical nutritional quality and taste. Many grocery chains apply standards even stricter than USDA benchmarks, forcing farmers to leave tons of sound fruit on the ground rather than absorb the cost of harvesting unsellable inventory.

- Displays are overstocked to counteract shopper bias against purchasing the final remaining item on a shelf. - Edible peaches are systematically discarded in fields if they exhibit superficial blemishes or irregular coloring. - Labeling a peach as a USDA "No. 2" can erase up to two-thirds of its market value for the grower. - Retail chains frequently implement aesthetic acceptance thresholds that surpass official USDA grading guidelines.

[09:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=565s) The Expiration Date Myth and Consumer Confusion

Beyond aesthetic bias, Oliver identifies consumer anxiety around expiration dates as another major source of food waste. Around 91% of consumers have discarded edible food past its printed date out of safety fears—a group Oliver admits he belongs to. This behavior persists despite the fact that expiration labels lack uniform meaning or federal regulation. A news broadcast demonstrates this inconsistency by examining cartons of identical 2% milk from the same brand, finding labels marked arbitrarily as "Use By," "Sell By," or just an isolated calendar date. Oliver likens the ambiguity to the label on Smirnoff vodka claiming it is "triple distilled": “Oh, really, Smirnoff? So you ran the potato sweats through the tube sock two extra times? Thanks for spending the effort.”

Shoppers routinely conflate "sell-by" dates with food safety limits, but food experts clarify that these stamps have almost nothing to do with whether an item is safe to consume. Instead, they represent a manufacturer’s subjective estimate of when a product will reach peak freshness and quality. Because manufacturers establish their own guidelines without standardized federal oversight, Oliver points out the commercial incentive: shorter freshness windows nudge customers into throwing away edible goods prematurely and repurchasing them sooner, functioning much like planned obsolescence in consumer electronics.

> “Actually, it has nothing to do with safety at all. It's just a manufacturer's best guess of when that food is going to be the freshest and at the best quality.” — *Food expert in news segment*

[10:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=648s) The Expiration Date Illusion and the Fear of Liability

Except for baby formula, the federal government does not require food to carry any expiration date at all, leaving state regulations to form a confusing patchwork where nine states require no date labels whatsoever. Because of this, John Oliver notes that sell-by dates are essentially meaningless suggestions that look official but can be safely disregarded, comparing them to an overzealous child dressed up in a police costume: “Just stop it Tyler, I'm not under arrest, you're under arrest!” Nonetheless, consumers and grocery retailers treat these printed dates as gospel, leading stores to routinely discard products even before they reach their sell-by milestones. When asked why close-dated or surplus food is thrown straight into the garbage rather than donated to local charities, store personnel cite company health and safety rules and express terror over legal consequences, insisting they throw it out because there are simply too many lawsuits.

Oliver dismantles this pervasive assumption, explaining that fear of litigation from donating surplus groceries is entirely unfounded. After looking into the legal record, researchers could not identify a single documented case where a food donor had ever been sued. Oliver compares the myth to the childhood belief that swimming within an hour of eating will inevitably cause cramps and drowning. Under federal law, donors are shielded by the Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act, which explicitly protects individuals and businesses from civil and criminal liability when they make donations in good faith. Oliver quips that this level of immunity must also apply to charitable clothing drop-offs, even though anyone donating an out-of-style cowl neck sweater should probably face legal consequences: “Donating a cowl neck sweater? Hello, the homeless live in shelters, not 2008!”

- With the sole exception of infant formula, the federal government mandates no expiration dates on food products. - Nine U.S. states have zero requirements for food date labeling. - The Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act legally protects donors from liability for food given in good faith, and there is no record of any donor ever being sued for donating food that made someone sick.

[12:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=769s) The Financial Hurdles and the Fate of H.R. 644

Even when businesses recognize they will not face lawsuits, the sheer logistical expense of food donation remains a massive barrier. Harold McClarty of HMC Farms explains that while growers would love to send unmarketable produce like surplus peaches to hunger-relief agencies, processing, packaging, storing, and transporting heavy fresh fruit requires significant resources. McClarty notes that “getting it into the hands of somebody to eat it isn't free,” warning that without economic incentives, “it's a lot easier and cheaper just to basically throw it away.” Oliver argues that businesses cannot be faulted for guarding their bottom lines, observing that expecting corporations to act like non-profits without incentives is unrealistic. While large corporations receive permanent federal tax breaks for food donations, small businesses, family farms, and independent restaurants face an unpredictable system where their tax deduction must be continually re-authorized by Congress on a temporary basis, making long-term donation planning financially risky.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Legislative Fate of HR 644 accDescr: Diagram showing how HR 644 was stripped and rewritten between the House and Senate. subgraph House["House of Representatives"] A["H.R. 644 Introduced (Fighting Hunger Incentive Act)"] --> B["Bundled into America Gives More Act"] B --> C["Passed by House with Permanent Tax Break"] end subgraph Senate["United States Senate"] C --> D["Stripped of all original content"] D --> E["Renamed Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015"] E --> F["Replaced with customs & foreign policy provisions"] end ```

In February 2015, lawmakers attempted to rectify this disparity through H.R. 644, known as the Fighting Hunger Incentive Act, which was designed to make the charitable donation deduction permanent for all businesses. A bill sponsor underscored the behavioral necessity of permanent rules, observing: “When something's not permanent, it affects our behavior—that's why we all treat rental cars like we're in a Fast and Furious movie.” The House passed the proposal after bundling it with other tax measures into the “America Gives More Act.” However, once the legislation reached the United States Senate, lawmakers completely hollowed out the measure. Senators stripped the entire food-donation text, renamed it the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015, and filled it with completely unrelated language regarding border enforcement and U.S.-Israel trade relations. Oliver compares this bait-and-switch maneuver to ordering a veggie burger at a diner, only for the server to deliver meatloaf, call it a waffle, and prevent you from giving it away because you cannot be sure you will receive a tax credit.

[16:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=963s) Re-evaluating Waste and the Honest Fast Food Ad

Addressing the food waste crisis requires sweeping cultural and structural changes beyond simple legislative fixes. Oliver emphasizes that while everyone across the political spectrum agrees small businesses should receive tax incentives for surplus food donations, solving the broader systemic emergency demands that Americans reconsider their everyday habits. Consumers must become willing to buy aesthetically imperfect or "ugly" produce, stop treating arbitrary sell-by stamps as hard expiration deadlines, and abandon the phantom dread of being taken to court by starving people. Without a comprehensive rethink of the national food supply chain, Oliver warns, commercial marketing will simply have to reflect the grotesque reality of American overconsumption and disposal.

To illustrate this point, the show concludes with a satirical parody of patriotic, over-the-top fast-food commercials from chains like Carl's Jr. and Hardee's. An intense voiceover boasts of a decadent burger piled with a hot dog and potato chips held by a bikini model inside a hot tub on a pickup truck aboard an aircraft carrier in front of the Statue of Liberty. The narrator reveals what is truly American: watching that cheeseburger tossed into the trash alongside fifteen others right in front of an impoverished family of four, who stand atop a mountain of fourteen tons of misshapen produce and eighty tons of dairy discarded one day past its sell-by date. The entire scene culminates in a giant tear falling from Abraham Lincoln's eye on Mount Rushmore, where the monument sits buried chin-deep in decomposing cheeseburgers venting clouds of red, white, and blue methane gas.

- Comprehensive reform requires willingness to eat cosmetically imperfect produce, ignoring non-safety date labels, and supporting permanent donation tax deductions. - John Oliver summarizes the broad consensus: “The insane thing is, everyone basically agrees small businesses should get tax incentives to donate food, so we have to find a way to pass that.”

## Notable quotes > [16:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=963s) The insane thing is, everyone basically agrees small businesses should get tax incentives to donate food, so we have to find a way to pass that. — John Oliver

## Mentioned Abraham Lincoln, Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act, Cap'n Crunch's Oops! All Berries, Carl's Jr., Fighting Hunger Incentive Act, Golden Corral, Hardee's, Harold McClarty, HMC Farms, IHOP, John Oliver, Natural Resources Defense Council, Papa John's, Red Lobster, Samantha Hoops, Smirnoff, Statue of Liberty, Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015, United States Department of Agriculture, United States House of Representatives, United States Senate

## Video description Producers, sellers, and consumers waste tons of food. John Oliver discusses the shocking amount of food we don’t eat.

Connect with Last Week Tonight online... Subscribe to the Last Week Tonight YouTube channel for more almost news as it almost happens: www.youtube.com/user/LastWeekTonight

Find Last Week Tonight on Facebook like your mom would: http://Facebook.com/LastWeekTonight

Visit our official site for all that other stuff at once: http://www.hbo.com/lastweektonight

[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY)

中文简报

食物浪费：《约翰·奥利弗上周今夜秀》（HBO）美国生产的食物中高达40%未被食用，每年浪费达1650亿美元，并在垃圾填埋场释放大量甲烷，而与此同时，近5000万美国人生活在面临粮食不安全的家庭中。约翰·奥利弗解释称，这一危机是由零售过度备货、导致有瑕疵农产品烂在田间严苛的外观标准，以及消费者对缺乏规范的保质期和最佳销售期的困惑所共同推动的。他援引《比尔·埃默森好撒玛利亚人食物捐赠法案》的保护条款，破除了食物捐赠存在诉讼风险的普遍谣言，同时详细说明了物流成本，以及导致H.R. 644法案中小企业捐赠税收抵免被大幅削减的国会政治运作。奥利弗最终指出，解决该危机既需要结构性的税收减免，也需要观念上的转变，比如接纳外表不完美的农产品以及忽视武断设立的日期标签。美国生产的所有食物中有多达40%未被食用，每年被丢弃的食物总额达1650亿美元，相比20世纪70年代增加了约50%。 (0:04) 垃圾填埋场中腐烂的食物会释放大量甲烷（一种效力是二氧化碳20多倍的温室气体），而与此同时，近5000万美国人面临粮食不安全问题。 (3:19) 除婴儿配方奶粉外，联邦政府并未强制规定食品保质期，而《比尔·埃默森好撒玛利亚人食物捐赠法案》则保护善意捐赠者免受民事和刑事责任追究。 (10:48) 旨在将永久性食物捐赠税收抵免扩大至小企业的法案（H.R. 644）在参议院被彻底剔除并改写为一项海关与贸易法案。 (12:49)

Reading summary

According to John Oliver's report, up to 40% of food produced in the United States is discarded annually, driven by cosmetic retail standards, unregulated expiration dates, and perverse economic incentives rather than safety concerns. Scale and Impact of American Food Waste (0:04) Citing findings from the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Oliver reports that Americans discard roughly $165 billion worth of food each year, amounting to about 20 pounds per person each month and enough volume to fill 730 football stadiums annually. This volume has expanded by approximately 50% since the 1970s, with average households throwing away between 15% and 25% of the groceries they buy. This level of disposal occurs alongside severe domestic food insecurity, which affected nearly 50 million Americans in 2013. In addition to wasting human labor, fuel, and agricultural irrigation water during periods of extreme drought, discarded organic food breaks down anaerobically in landfills. This decomposition generates methane, a greenhouse gas more than 20 times more potent than carbon dioxide at trapping atmospheric heat. Cosmetic Standards and Supermarket Display Habits (6:21) A substantial portion of agricultural waste occurs before crops leave the farm due to cosmetic grading enforced by retailers and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Produce exhibiting minor superficial blemishes, such as USDA "No. 2" peaches, can lose up to two-thirds of its wholesale value despite identical taste and nutrition. Because grocery chains often enforce aesthetic guidelines stricter than federal benchmarks, farmers routinely leave tons of edible produce to rot on the ground rather than absorb harvesting costs. At the retail level, supermarket display practices exacerbate waste. Grocery stores and farm stands deliberately overstock shelves because consumers avoid purchasing solitary items, assuming leftover goods must be defective. Arbitrary Date Labeling and Liability Myths (9:25) Consumer confusion over expiration dates drives significant household waste, with approximately 91% of consumers reporting that they have discarded food past the printed date due to safety concerns. Except for infant formula, the federal government does not mandate expiration dates, leaving nine states with no date-labeling requirements at all. Food experts emphasize that phrases like "sell-by" or "use-by" reflect manufacturers' subjective estimates of peak freshness rather than indicators of bacterial contamination or health risks. Retailers also discard food approaching these dates due to fears of legal liability. Oliver notes this litigation fear is unfounded: researchers found no record of any food donor ever being sued for donating food that caused illness. Furthermore, the federal Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act shields individuals and businesses from civil and criminal liability when donating food in good faith. Logistical Costs and Federal Tax Disparities (12:49) Even when liability is not a concern, the logistical expenses of processing, packaging, storing, and transporting surplus fresh produce prevent farms and small vendors from donating. Harold McClarty of HMC Farms notes that without financial offsets, it is significantly cheaper and easier for growers to discard unmarketable fruit. Federal tax policy historically widened this gap: large corporations receive permanent deductions for food donations, while small businesses, family farms, and independent restaurants rely on temporary deductions requiring frequent congressional reauthorization. In 2015, the House passed H.R. 644 (the Fighting Hunger Incentive Act) to make these deductions permanent for all businesses. However, the Senate stripped all food donation language from the bill, renaming it the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 and replacing its contents with border enforcement and foreign trade provisions. Oliver concludes that addressing the waste crisis requires aligning small-business tax incentives with donation logistics, while shifting consumer culture to accept cosmetically imperfect produce and disregard non-safety date labels.

精炼阅读摘要

John Oliver在《上周今夜》（Last Week Tonight）节目中指出，美国每年有多达40%的食物遭弃置，而全美却有数千万人口面临粮食安全危机；这一结构性危机根源于零售体系对外表瑕疵的零容忍、保质期标签造成的公众认知混淆、对捐赠诉讼的虚妄恐惧，以及针对中小企业的税收激励机制长期缺位。资源错配与食物浪费的严峻环境代价 (3:19) 根据自然资源保护协会（NRDC）的研究数据，美国生产的食物中有多达40%最终未被食用，全美每年丢弃的食物价值高达1650亿美元，折合人均每月浪费约20磅，这一浪费规模相比20世纪70年代增长了约50%，且每年弃置的食物总量足以填满730个美式橄榄球场。加利福尼亚州萨利纳斯山谷（Salinas Valley）等农业集散地的弃置场展现了惊人的景象：大量完好、新鲜的有机生菜、菠菜、羽衣甘蓝和西兰花被成堆倒入垃圾场。与此同时，在普通家庭层面，美国家庭平均丢弃所购买食品的15%至25%，相当于消费者买下四袋杂货后直接在停车场遗弃其中一袋。这种巨大浪费与全美人道困境形成鲜明对照。2013年全美有近5000万人生活在粮食不安全（food-insecure）的家庭中，面临忍饥挨饿的困境。与此同时，弃置食物造成了极为严重的生态损失。在面临极端干旱的加利福尼亚州，用于种植最终被丢弃农作物的宝贵灌溉水被彻底挥霍；不仅如此，这些大量有机废弃物在垃圾填埋场中进行厌氧分解，释放出温室效应能力超过二氧化碳20多倍的甲烷气体。节目指出，大量可食用食物沦为垃圾填埋场的点缀，给地球大气层带来了深重的环境威胁。零售美学标准与货架陈列引发的损耗 (6:21) 食品供应链的巨大损耗往往早在农场与超市层面便已发生。为了迎合消费者的购买心理，超市与农场摊位普遍采取过度陈列策略。零售商观察到，当货架上只剩下一把单独的甜菜时，顾客会先入为主地认定它有瑕疵而在长达一小时内无人问津；相反，如果货架堆满30把甜菜，顾客便会冲动性地买走其中的25把。这种零售模式迫使商家保持商品过度饱和，直接诱发了末端的大量浪费。更为严重的损耗发生在上游田间，根源在于零售业严苛的外观标准。许多完好无损、营养价值完全相同的农产品，仅仅因为表皮瑕疵或着色不均便被采摘工直接遗弃在地里腐烂。根据美国农业部（USDA）的分级标准，完美的“U.S. No. 1”等级桃子可以按全价销售，而略有瑕疵的“U.S. No. 2”等级桃子即便口感和营养完全一致，其批发价值也会蒸发多达三分之二。许多大型连锁超市甚至制定了比美国农业部还要严苛的外观验收门槛，迫使果农宁愿让数以吨计的健康水果烂在果园里，也不愿承担采收无法上市农产品的额外成本。保质期标签迷思与对捐赠诉讼的误解 (9:25) 在消费端，消费者对保质期标签的安全焦虑是导致可食用食物被抛弃的核心原因。约91%的消费者曾因食品超过包装印刷日期而将其扔掉，尽管这些日期并不代表食品安全临界点。事实上，除婴儿配方奶粉外，美国联邦政府并未对任何食品强制规定保质期，全美甚至有九个州完全没有任何日期标注法规。市场上出现的“最佳食用期（Use By）”、“销售截止期（Sell By）”或单纯的日期印章，全凭食品制造商自行制定，仅代表厂商对食品风味和新鲜度峰值的主观估计。这种缺乏统一联邦标准的机制在商业上甚至起到了类似电子产品“计划性报废”的效果，促使消费者过早丢弃尚可食用的商品并重新购买。与此同时，零售商和企业普遍存在的法律恐惧阻碍了剩余食品流向救济机构。许多商店宁愿将临期食品直接销毁，也不愿捐赠，理由是害怕因食品安全问题引发顾客起诉。然而，法律记录表明，全美从未出现过任何一例食品捐赠者因受捐者生病而遭到起诉的判例。联邦早在法律层面出台了《比尔·埃默森良善撒玛利亚人食物捐赠法》（Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act），明确为所有出于善意捐赠食物的个人与企业提供免责保护，免除其民事和刑事责任。所谓的“捐赠诉讼风险”完全是一场毫无现实根据的心理幻觉。捐赠物流成本与税收激励的立法受阻 (12:49) 除了法律层面的误解，捐赠剩余食物所面临的实际物流与财务成本是阻碍慈善流转的现实瓶颈。来自加州果园HMC Farms的农场主Harold McClarty指出，种植者虽然乐于将无法上市的水果运往饥饿救济机构，但处理、包装、冷藏和运输重型新鲜水果需要消耗大量人力物力，将食物送到饥饿人群手中并非免费。如果缺乏有效的经济激励，对企业而言，直接把新鲜产物当场倒掉往往是最省钱、最便捷的选择。虽然大型跨国企业能够享受永久性的联邦食品捐赠税收减免，但广大小型企业、家庭农场和独立餐馆的捐赠税收抵扣政策却长期属于临时性质，必须依赖国会定期重新授权，这使得小企业难以进行长远的捐赠规划。 2015年2月，美国国会众议院曾试图通过代号为H.R. 644的《抗击饥饿激励法案》（Fighting Hunger Incentive Act），将捐赠税收减免永久化扩大至所有企业，并将其纳入《美国给予更多法案》（America Gives More Act）中顺利表决通过。然而，该法案送交美国参议院后却遭遇了彻底的“偷梁换柱”：参议员们剥离了关于食物捐赠的全部实质内容，将法案更名为《2015年贸易便利化与贸易执法法案》（Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015），取而代之的是边境执法与美以贸易关系等完全无关的条款。两党对于为小企业提供食物捐赠税收激励本已具有广泛共识，但关键的制度支撑却在立法国会的博弈中化为泡影。化解美国的食物浪费危机需要全方位的系统性变革与公众文化重塑。消费者必须摒弃对果蔬外貌的过度苛求，理性识别并非衡量安全标准的保质期标签，并消除针对食物捐赠的诉讼恐惧；与此同时，立法机构亟需重新通过针对中小企业的永久性捐赠税收优惠，唯有消除制度与经济屏障，才能避免每年价值千亿美元的可食用物资继续在垃圾填埋场中腐烂并加剧环境危机。

Detailed notes — zh

## Background 该视频由脱口秀节目频道《Last Week Tonight with John Oliver》（HBO）于 2015 年 7 月 20 日发布在 YouTube 平台。视频页面简介指出，生产商、零售商和普通消费者都在浪费海量粮食，主持人 John Oliver 将在节目中深入探讨美国人所浪费的令人震惊的食物总量。 ## TL;DR 本期节目揭示了美国高达 40% 的食物从未被食用的惊人现状：全美每年浪费价值 1650 亿美元的食品，同时却有近 5000 万人面临食品不安全困境，巨量填埋的有机废弃物还释放出严重的温室气体甲烷。John Oliver 深入剖析了造成浪费的根源，包括超市过度陈列与对“完美外观”的病态审美、公众与商家对缺乏科学规范的“保质期”标签的恐慌性盲从，以及对食品捐赠诉讼的虚幻恐惧。此外，由于针对小企业的食品捐赠税收减免法案在国会惨遭“掏空替换”，直接丢弃比捐赠成本更低，最终促成了这一全系统性的荒唐浪费。 ## Atmosphere & style 整期节目贯穿着 John Oliver 标志性的辛辣讽刺与快节奏的冷幽默，在荒诞不经的搞笑比喻与令人心头一紧的现实数据之间无缝切换。从调侃塞满热狗的高热量快餐广告，到展示饥饿家庭与成吨优质蔬菜在填埋场腐烂的残酷对比，现场观众的笑声时常伴随着倒吸一口凉气的震惊与沉重。结尾处对经典商业广告的残酷解构将讽刺推向高潮，既充满歇斯底里的喜剧张力，又带给观众一种对制度性荒谬感到愤怒与刺痛的观影冲击感。 ## Bulletin - [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=4s) 美国每年丢弃价值 1650 亿美元的食物，高达 40% 的粮食从未被食用，足以为 730 座橄榄球场填满废弃物。 - [03:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=199s) 全美近 5000 万人面临食品不安全，而填埋场堆积的有机废物在无氧状态下产生温室效应为二氧化碳 20 倍以上的甲烷气体。 - [09:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=561s) 市场上普遍存在的“Best By”和“Sell By”标签并非官方安全红线，仅代表生产商对风味的猜测，联邦法律仅强制规范婴儿配方奶粉。 - [10:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=648s) 因担心诉讼而丢弃食品纯属虚妄恐慌，《爱默生法案》明确保护善意捐赠者免受法律起诉，且至今未发生一起诉讼案例。 - [12:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=769s) 旨在永久化小企业食品捐赠税收减免的 HR 644 法案在参议院被掏空改写，沦为无关边境管制与美以关系的贸易法案。 ## Key takeaways - [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=4s) 美国生产的食物中有高达 40% 从未被食用，每年浪费的食物总值达 1650 亿美元，人均每月扔掉约 20 磅食物。 - [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=4s) 全美自 1970 年代以来食物浪费量攀升约 50%，加州等垃圾填埋场堆满完好无损的新鲜蔬菜。 - [03:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=199s) 在惊人浪费的同时，2013 年全美有近 5000 万人生活在面临温饱困境的食品不安全家庭中。 - [03:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=199s) 填埋场无氧分解的大量被弃食物释放出强效温室气体甲烷，其致暖效应是二氧化碳的 20 倍以上。 - [03:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=199s) 美国家庭平均丢弃所购食品的 15% 至 25%，造成严重的家庭财务与灌溉水资源白白损耗。 - [05:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=358s) 商超与农夫市集为了迎合顾客心理习惯过度陈列货架，导致未被选购的临近收摊产品被迫报废。 - [05:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=358s) 严苛的果蔬审美标准让大量微瑕农产品在采摘时直接被丢弃在农田，仅因外表降为二级品便损失三分之二市值。 - [09:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=561s) 高达 91% 的消费者曾因食品过期标签丢弃食物，但市面各类日期标签缺乏统一规范且极易误导公众。 - [09:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=561s) 绝大多数保质期标签纯属厂商对风味巅峰的最佳猜测，厂商天然存在缩短标示周期以刺激重复购买的商业动机。 - [10:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=648s) 除婴儿配方奶粉外，联邦法律并未强制要求标注食品保质期，全美有 9 个州甚至完全不要求标注日期。 - [10:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=648s) 超市与餐馆对捐赠食品引发诉讼的担忧毫无依据，《爱默生法案》从法律上彻底保护了出于善意的食品捐赠企业。 - [12:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=769s) 食品捐赠需要装箱、冷藏与运输等实际物流成本，缺乏经济激励让小企业和农场宁可选择直接倾倒销毁。 - [12:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=769s) 旨在永久解决小企业捐赠税收抵免的 HR 644 法案在参议院被全盘替换成边境与贸易议题，未能提供制度托底。 - [16:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=963s) 解决食物浪费问题需要全社会重塑观念：消除诉讼臆想、接纳丑陋果蔬、理性看待保质期并提供持续的政策激励。 ## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=4s) 美国的饮食崇拜与触目惊心的食物浪费节目开篇，John Oliver 调侃道，今晚的主题是食物，或者用动植物的话来说叫“来世”。美国人极度热爱食物，电视广告里充斥着 Golden Corral 的“无限量鸡翅”以及各大餐厅常年推出的“吃到饱煎饼”和“无尽海虾”。食品营销甚至成了一种情绪代偿——把廉价猪肉碎块裹上烧烤酱，号称能填补你内心的空虚。庆祝美国也往往与庆祝其高热量饮食画等号：正如 Carl's Jr. 和 Hardee's 推出的一款厚汉堡（Most American Thickburger）广告，里面塞满了热狗和薯片，由名模 Samantha Hoops 拿着，坐在由斗牛士驾驶在航母上的皮卡车浴缸里，在自由女神的注视下大快朵颐。Oliver 讽刺道，这种夹着热狗和薯片的芝士汉堡简直是“新时代的邦联旗”。然而，今晚讨论的核心并非美国人吃进肚子里的食物，而是那些被扔掉的食物。根据自然资源保护委员会（Natural Resources Defense Council, NRDC）的报告，美国生产的食物中竟有高达 40% 从未被食用。美国人每年扔掉价值 1650 亿美元的食物，平均每人每月丢弃约 20 磅；全国一年浪费的食物足以填满 730 座橄榄球场。自 20 世纪 70 年代以来，这一浪费量增加了约 50%。在加州萨利纳斯山谷（Salinas Valley）的垃圾堆填区，现场堆积着整车整车的新鲜有机生菜、菠菜、羽衣甘蓝和西兰花，状态完好无损。Oliver 吐槽说，这里的废弃蔬菜甚至能拌出一份比麦当劳好得多的沙拉。 - 美国每年丢弃价值 1650 亿美元的食物。 - 每年浪费的食物体积相当于 730 个美式橄榄球场。 - 人均每月丢弃食物约 20 磅。 - 生产商、零售商和消费者合计浪费了全美三分之一以上的粮食，且该数字较 1970 年代增长了约 50%。 ### [03:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=199s) 食物浪费的三重代价：饥饿、生态与钱包食物无法“从农场走上餐桌”带来了极其沉重的多重后果。首当其冲的是社会不平等：2013 年，全美有近 5000 万人生活在“食品不安全”（food insecure）家庭中，意味着他们一年中某些时候连温饱都难以维持。纪录片镜头中，一位母亲含泪表示，为了让年幼的孩子吃饱，自己宁愿挨饿，预算精确到每一分钱依然入不敷出。在一年浪费 730 座球场食物的国度里发生这种事，显得极其荒谬。其次是环境与自然资源的白白耗损。加州当时正遭遇罕见大旱，土地干涸，农民抽调宝贵的水资源灌溉农作物，最终却只是给垃圾填埋场当“装饰”。更严重的是垃圾填埋场的生化反应：如果把苹果核丢在树林里自然降解并无大碍，但当海量食物在填埋场中堆积、处于无氧状态分解时，会释放出大量甲烷气体（Methane），其温室效应是二氧化碳的 20 倍以上。Oliver 形容这就像“把垃圾毯子蒙在一个胃胀气的人身上，给整个地球灌臭气”。最后，即便对饥饿人群和生态危机漠不关心，这也是一笔巨大的经济损失：美国家庭平时购买的食物中有 15% 到 25% 直接进了垃圾桶，等于去超市提着四大袋食品出来，在停车场手滑掉了一整袋却连捡都懒得捡。 > “In 2013 nearly 50 million Americans lived in food insecure households meaning that at some point in the year they struggled to put enough food on the table.” —— John Oliver ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 食物浪费的环境与经济连锁反应 accDescr: 展示过量食物被丢弃后如何对水资源、温室效应和家庭财务造成负面影响 subgraph Cost ["浪费的三重代价"] A["40% 食物未被食用"] --> B["社会层面：5000万人面临食品不安全"] A --> C["环境层面：白白耗费灌溉水资源"] A --> D["家庭财务：丢弃 15%-25% 所购食物"] end subgraph Landfill ["填埋场生态危机"] C --> E["海量有机物堆积于填埋场"] E --> F["无氧环境分解产生甲烷"] F --> G["温室效应强度为 CO2 的 20 倍以上"] end ``` ### [05:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=358s) 审美至上与病态的陈列心理社会对食物浪费的纵容很大程度上源于商业习惯和消费者的非理性心理。农副产品摊位和超市往往刻意过度陈列（Overstock）。一位农场摊主指出，如果摊位上只剩最后一把甜菜（chard），哪怕距离收摊还有一小时，顾客也绝不会买它，因为大家总怀疑“剩下的最后一份肯定有毛病”；但如果摊上堆放着 30 把饱满的甜菜，往往能瞬间卖掉 25 把。消费者这种盲目的冲动消费心理，倒逼商家必须大量超量备货。更严苛的浪费发生在田间地头。为了迎合零售业挑剔的标准，略有瑕疵的果蔬在采摘阶段就会被直接扔在地上任其腐烂。果园地面上铺满了外表微瑕、口感却完全合格的优质桃子。Oliver 调侃道，如今超市的果蔬货架就像“莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥的择偶标准”，只允许外表完美无瑕者进入。美国农业部（USDA）甚至为此制定了严苛的等级标准：一级品（No. 1）外表光鲜，而一旦被评为二级品（No. 2），即便果肉内部毫无差别，农户售价立刻大跌三分之二；而各大零售商的私人验收标准往往比农业部更加严苛。 > “As soon as it is labeled a number two, it can lose two-thirds of its market value to a farmer even though its contents are the same.” —— John Oliver ### [09:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=561s) 被误解的“保质期”盲从除了“外貌协会”心理，消费者丢弃食物的另一个主力因素是恐惧。据统计，约 91% 的人曾因为食品过了包装上的日期而将其扔掉，而大家对这些标签的含义往往处于混乱之中。新闻调查显示，同一品牌、同为 2% 脂肪含量的牛奶盒上，标注的方式五花八门：有的印着“Best By”（最佳赏味期），有的印着“Sell By”（销售截止日），有的甚至只有一串孤零零的数字，缺乏统一规范。Oliver 吐槽说，食品界唯一比这些日期更没有意义的标签，就是斯米诺（Smirnoff）伏特加瓶身上印的“三重蒸馏”。公众普遍误以为“Sell By”等日期是政府或科学家制定的硬性安全红线。但业内专家指出，这些日期与食品安全毫无关系，纯粹是食品生产商根据自身判断作出的“风味与品质最佳状态”的预估猜测。Oliver 犀利地指出，由制造商自行制定赏味期限天然存在利益驱动：厂商恨不得把日期定得越短越好，以此制造恐慌、催促消费者赶紧扔掉旧的买新的，毕竟食品厂商不像苹果公司，无法通过推送新操作系统让消费者手里的旧麦片瞬间变卡废掉。 > “Well, actually it has nothing to do with safety at all; it's just a manufacturer's best guess of when that food is going to be the freshest and at the best quality.” —— 新闻受访食品专家 ### [10:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=648s) 保质期标签的真相与对诉讼的虚幻恐惧联邦政府除了对婴儿配方奶粉（baby formula）有强制规定外，根本不要求任何其他食品标注保质期。各州的法律也大相径庭，全美甚至有 9 个州完全不要求贴任何日期标签。John Oliver 指出，这意味着大多数时候，食品包装上的“销售截止日期”（sell-by date）就像“穿警察制服的小孩”一样——看起来煞有介事，但实际上你可以完全不当回事。然而，正是因为公众和商家误以为这些日期具有法律与健康效应，大量超市在食品还未到达标示日期前就直接扔进垃圾桶，并且拒绝捐赠。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 超市丢弃临期食品的错误逻辑链路 accDescr: 展示公众对保质期的误解和对诉讼的虚幻恐惧，如何导致大量可食用食品被丢弃而非捐赠。 subgraph Reality["法律与现实真相"] A["联邦法律仅强制规范 婴儿配方奶粉"] B["爱默生法案保护 善意捐赠者免责"] end subgraph Misconception["商家的认知误区"] C["误将销售日期视为 硬性变质标准"] D["恐惧因食物中毒 吃官司被起诉"] end subgraph Outcome["最终结果"] E["大量完好食品 直接送进垃圾桶"] end A -.->|实际上| C B -.->|实际上| D C --> E D --> E ``` 一段实地采访展现了超市员工的普遍心态：当被问及为何不把临期食品捐给慈善机构而是扔进垃圾桶时，店员斩钉截铁地回答这是“食品卫生与安全问题”，并且强调“因为会有太多诉讼”（too many lawsuits），尽管店员自己也承认并不清楚本店是否真的被起诉过。针对这种普遍的恐慌，Oliver 澄清道：“我们查阅了资料，完全找不到哪怕一起食品捐赠者被起诉的案例；它根本不存在。”（“...we looked into it and couldn’t find a single case where a food donor has been sued it doesn’t happen...”）这种担心就像相信“吃饱后游泳会抽筋溺亡”一样是无稽之谈。实际上，美国早就出台了《爱默生法案》（Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act），从法律上明文规定：只要企业是出于善意（in good faith）向慈善机构捐赠食物，就依法享有免除诉讼的保护。 - 全美共有 9 个州没有任何法律要求食品必须标注日期标签。 - 《爱默生法案》（Emerson Act）为所有出于善意捐赠食品的企业和个人提供诉讼豁免权。 ### [12:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=769s) 捐赠的经济成本与“偷梁换柱”的国会法案消除对诉讼的恐惧并不能彻底解决问题，因为捐赠食品本身存在高昂的物流与运营成本。加州 HMC Farms 的农场主 Harold McClarty 直言，把桃子免费送到需要的人手中并不是“零成本”的：“必须有经济激励，才能促使更多这类食品流入食物银行可以利用的渠道；坦白说，直接扔掉要简单、便宜得多。”（“There’s got to be an economic incentive to move more of this into an avenue that food banks could take advantage of it’s a lot easier and cheaper just to basically throw it away.”）捐赠需要装箱、冷藏仓储、协调物流调度，产生沉重的经常性开支。大企业早已享有永久性的捐赠税收抵免，但针对小企业、家族农场和本地餐馆的税收抵免却不是美国税法的永久条款，必须依赖国会定期延展，这导致小微企业根本无法预期年底能否获得抵扣，从而放弃捐献。 ```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: HR 644 法案在国会被掏空改写的过程 accDescr: 描述关于小企业食品捐赠税收抵免的 HR 644 法案在国会众议院和参议院流转时的戏剧性演变。 subgraph House["众议院阶段"] A["HR 644 原案 《抗击饥饿激励法案》 使小企业捐赠税收减免永久化"] B["《美国给予更多法案》 打包其他未获资金支持的税收减免"] A -->|打包修改| B end subgraph Senate["参议院阶段"] C["《2015年贸易促进与执法法案》 清空饥饿条款，替换为 边境控制与美以关系内容"] B -->|送入参议院| C end ``` 2015 年 2 月，国会议员提出了名为《抗击饥饿激励法案》（Fighting Hunger Incentive Act，代号 HR 644）的法案，旨在将小企业的税收优惠永久化。该提案在众议院通过，并被打包更名为《美国给予更多法案》（America Gives More Act）。然而，当法案被送入参议院后，议员们运用了一种惊人的国会立法伎俩：参议院直接清空了该法案的原有文本，将其改名为《2015年贸易促进与执法法案》（Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015），塞满了关于边境管制和美以关系的全新法条。法案虽然形式上通过了，但与食品捐赠相关的内容被拔得一干二净。Oliver 讽刺道，这就像去餐厅点了一份素食汉堡，服务员却端上来一份肉糕并称之为“华夫饼”，顾客甚至连“把它捐给需要的人”都做不到，因为餐厅根本不知道能不能拿到该死的税收抵免。 - HR 644 提案最初试图确立小企业食品捐赠税收减免的永久有效性，避免短视政策干扰商业行为。 - 参议院通过“掏空后替换”（gut-and-replace）手段，将一部对抗饥饿的民生法案变成了完全无关的贸易与地缘政治法案。 ### [16:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=963s) 解决之道与极其“诚实”的汉堡广告讽刺要扭转每年惊人的食物浪费，税收政策激励仅仅是其中一环。全社会必须重构对待食物的态度：不仅要建立制度让企业有动力捐助，消费者也要下定决心去接纳长相不完美的“丑陋水果”（uglier fruit）、对保质期标签持审慎态度、不再臆想会有精明律师代表饥民起诉食品捐献者。节目的最后，Oliver 指出，如果全社会无法直面并改变与食物浪费之间的扭曲关系，那么美国的商业广告就必须变得加倍“诚实”。现场随后播出了对 Carl's Jr. 和 Hardee's 标志性广告的犀利讽刺短片：原本在航空母舰、皮卡车和自由女神像前，性感模特泡在热水澡桶里大嚼夹着热狗与薯片的芝士汉堡；但更为“纯正美式风格”的真实景象，则是当着一家缺乏食物保障、瞪大双眼不敢置信的四口之家的面，将这份汉堡连同另外 15 个完好无损的汉堡直接扔进垃圾堆。这家人正踩在 14 吨仅仅是外观不佳但完全可食用的果蔬之上，底下还压着 80 吨仅仅过了一天任意标示日期的乳制品；这一切堆积在拉什莫尔山上，顺着亚伯拉罕·林肯雕像的眼泪一路向下，浸泡在数以百万计正在腐烂、散发着红白蓝三色易燃甲烷气体的废弃汉堡堆里——短片以极具冲击力的旁白收尾：“那才是他妈的真正的美国精神。”（“That is f***ing American.”） ## Notable quotes > [12:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY&t=769s) There’s got to be an economic incentive to move more of this into an avenue that food banks could take advantage of it’s a lot easier and cheaper just to basically throw it away. — Harold McClarty ## Mentioned John Oliver, Golden Corral, Carl's Jr., Hardee's, Samantha Hoops, 自然资源保护委员会 (NRDC), 麦当劳, 莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥, 美国农业部 (USDA), 斯米诺 (Smirnoff), 《爱默生法案》 (Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act), HMC Farms, Harold McClarty, 《抗击饥饿激励法案》 (HR 644), 《美国给予更多法案》 (America Gives More Act), 《2015年贸易促进与执法法案》 (Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015), 拉什莫尔山, 亚伯拉罕·林肯 ## Video description Producers, sellers, and consumers waste tons of food. John Oliver discusses the shocking amount of food we don’t eat. Connect with Last Week Tonight online... Subscribe to the Last Week Tonight YouTube channel for more almost news as it almost happens: www.youtube.com/user/LastWeekTonight Find Last Week Tonight on Facebook like your mom would: http://Facebook.com/LastWeekTonight Follow us on Twitter for news about jokes and jokes about news: http://Twitter.com/LastWeekTonight Visit our official site for all that other stuff at once: http://www.hbo.com/lastweektonight [Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8xwLWb0lLY)

Source quotes

[12:49] Harold McClarty: There’s got to be an economic incentive to move more of this into an avenue that food banks could take advantage of it’s a lot easier and cheaper just to basically throw it away.

Source quotes

[16:03] John Oliver: The insane thing is, everyone basically agrees small businesses should get tax incentives to donate food, so we have to find a way to pass that.

Original transcript

[0:04] our main story tonight concerns food or [0:06] as plants and animals might call it the [0:09] afterlife we we love food in America as [0:12] you would know if you've ever turned on [0:13] a television set I have I you can eat [0:16] pancakes are back introducing all you [0:18] could eat wings only at Golden Corral [0:21] everyone's favorite endless shrimp is [0:22] back people wait for this promotion all [0:25] year [0:28] Longet all that you can eat [0:33] now sadness sadness sadness let food [0:36] replace your sadness stuff riblets in [0:39] that hole in your [0:41] heart that is that's a catchy way to [0:45] sell hog scraps head in barbecue sauce [0:47] in fact celebrating America often goes [0:50] hand inhand with celebrating its food [0:53] what's this actual commercial running [0:55] right now what's more American than a [0:57] cheeseburger this cheeseburger loaded [1:00] with a hot dog and potato chips in the [1:02] hands of All American model Samantha [1:05] Hoops in a hot tub in a pickup truck [1:08] driven by an American bull rider on an [1:11] aircraft carrier under the Gaze of Lady [1:14] Liberty as she admires the most American [1:18] thick Burger New at Carl Jr and Hardy [1:21] wow a cheeseburger with hot dog and [1:25] potato chips ladies and gentlemen I give [1:27] you the new Confederate flag [1:30] she's [1:31] Majestic but but this is not this is not [1:34] a story about the food we eat it's a [1:37] story about the food we don't eat [1:39] because there is a surprising amount of [1:41] it a report by the natural resources [1:43] defense Council says that as much as 40% [1:46] of all the food produced in the United [1:48] States never gets eaten Americans throw [1:51] away 165 billion worth of food every [1:55] year that's about 20 lb per person every [1:59] month Americans throw away enough food [2:01] every year to fill [2:03] 730 football stadiums food waste is like [2:07] the band Rascal Flats it can fill a [2:10] surprising number of stadiums even [2:12] though many people consider it complete [2:14] garbage but between producers Sellers [2:18] and consumers Americans are throwing out [2:20] a third or more of our food and the [2:22] amount we throw out has increased by [2:24] around 50% since the 1970s at this rate [2:28] in 40 years when you order pizza from [2:30] they'll just deliver it straight to the [2:31] nearest dumpster as they should but [2:34] that's not the point here and and if you [2:36] think if you think that this sounds bad [2:39] just wait until you see how it looks [2:41] check out this waste dump in [2:43] California's Selenas Valley we got a [2:46] whole load pretty much of loose organic [2:48] lettuce you know we we've got spinach [2:50] towards the back uh looks like it's [2:52] perfectly fine nothing wrong with it we [2:54] got some uh some kale here we got [2:56] broccoli in the back as well we have [2:58] plenty of produce you make a salad here [3:01] oh not just a salad you could make a [3:03] significantly better salad than the [3:05] salads they actually sell at McDonald's [3:07] which look like the trimmings in Ronald [3:09] McDonald's lawnmower mixed with Grimace [3:11] ejaculate and and the thing is watching [3:14] all that food go from Farm to not a [3:17] table is awful for a bunch of reasons [3:19] first and most obviously there are many [3:21] people in this country who need that [3:23] food in 2013 nearly 50 million Americans [3:27] lived in food insecure households [3:29] meaning that that's some point in the [3:30] year they struggle to put enough food on [3:32] the table and the fact that we throw [3:33] away a third of our food gets pretty [3:35] alarming when you hear from some of [3:37] those people it's hard I I'll go without [3:41] food before my kids will budg is down to [3:43] the penny and it's just not enough [3:47] still it brings you to tears yeah why [3:51] it's just hard they're so young and it's [3:53] hard it is crazy that that is happening [3:56] in a country with 730 football stadiums [3:59] for of uneaten food it's insane but [4:02] there are also other less obvious [4:04] consequences to discarding food for a [4:06] start we're wasting all the labor and [4:08] natural resources that went into making [4:10] it and at a time when the landscape of [4:12] California is shriveling up like a [4:14] pumpkin in front of a house with a lazy [4:16] dad it seems especially unwise the [4:20] farmers are pumping water into food that [4:22] ends up being used as a garnish for [4:24] landfills because those landfills go on [4:26] to cause problems of their own if you [4:28] were to throw an an apple core just out [4:30] into the woods it's not a big deal [4:33] problem comes when all of that waste is [4:35] aggregated and it decomposes without air [4:38] in a landfill that Anor robic condition [4:41] is what creates methane which is a [4:44] greenhouse gas that's more than 20 times [4:47] as potent as CO2 at trapping heat that's [4:50] right when we dump food into a landfill [4:52] we're essentially throwing a trash [4:53] blanket over a flatulent food man and [4:56] Dutch ovening the entire planet and and [4:59] if you're thinking but but hold on John [5:02] what if I'm an who couldn't give [5:03] a about America's hungry families [5:05] or the long-term viability of life on [5:07] Earth well first let me say Mr Trump [5:09] thank you so much for taking the time to [5:11] watch this show tonight it's lovely to [5:14] have you with us and secondly don't [5:17] worry there is a selfish Financial [5:19] reason for you to care about this story [5:21] too in our households we're wasting [5:24] somewhere between 15 and 25% of the food [5:26] that we're buying you know that's [5:28] expensive I mean imagine walking out of [5:30] a grocery store with four bags of [5:32] groceries dropping one in the parking [5:34] lot and just not bothering to pick it up [5:36] and that's essentially what we're doing [5:38] in our homes today and that's not good [5:42] when you're throwing away that much food [5:43] you're not just being wasteful you're [5:45] whining and dining [5:47] raccoons oh this is absolutely [5:49] lovely thanks for this we needed a break [5:52] from the [5:54] kids and look look it's a good thing so [5:58] many of us have access to plenty of [6:00] relatively inexpensive food I love the [6:02] fact that we live in a country with cap [6:04] and crunch uh peanut butter crunch [6:06] chocolatey crunch sprinkle donut crunch [6:09] cinnamon roll crunch Christmas Crunch [6:11] and Halloween crunch I will even defend [6:14] oops or berries crunch a cereal so [6:17] unnecessary that its actual name [6:19] includes an apology for its existence [6:21] but it does seem it does seem like our [6:24] food wastage is getting to a critical [6:27] mass and so much of it stems from our [6:29] own habits and misconceptions for [6:31] instance stores big and small often [6:34] routinely Overstock so that you can walk [6:36] in and see tons of food there because if [6:39] they don't do that as this small [6:41] Farmstand operator describes it we might [6:43] not buy anything if this was what I [6:47] had and there was an hour left in the [6:49] market that one bunch of chart would sit [6:52] there and no one would buy it but if I [6:54] had 30 Bunches of chart all like [6:57] bursting out I'd probably sell like25 [6:59] those punches a chart so what does that [7:01] say like people are totally impulse JS [7:04] and they think if there's one left that [7:06] there's something wrong with it it's [7:08] true I wouldn't buy that chard partly [7:10] because it's chard but mainly because we [7:14] naturally assume the last option is a [7:16] bad option which in many contexts is [7:18] absolutely the case for example uh you [7:20] don't want the last magazine in the [7:22] doctor's office because it's always Golf [7:25] Digest always and no one has ever read [7:28] Golf Digest that's not even a golf club [7:30] in his hand but no one noticed because [7:32] it's on Golf [7:35] Digest but when it comes to produce the [7:38] last option is probably completely fine [7:41] especially because as another farmer [7:42] explains even slightly subar fruits and [7:45] vegetables don't make it to the produce [7:47] oil every time that the people are [7:49] picking they'll have a few they throw on [7:51] the ground because there's always a few [7:52] that aren't quite perfect this is a [7:54] perfectly good Peach right on the ground [7:56] like this y oh my God if you just look [7:59] down this way it's like a bounty look at [8:03] that and the reason that happens is that [8:05] if a peach doesn't meet strict aesthetic [8:07] standards it might not be worth a farmer [8:09] even trying to sell it our produce oils [8:12] have become a lot like Leonardo [8:13] DiCaprio's penis exclusively accessible [8:15] to the physically [8:17] Flawless and it's not right that's not [8:19] right in fact our produce body shaming [8:23] is actually so ingrained it's reflected [8:25] in the usda's grading standards just [8:27] look at the visual grading standards for [8:29] peaches this is a number one peach and [8:32] of course it is that's an undeniably [8:34] beautiful peach I I want to buy that [8:36] peach dinner and it whereas whereas [8:39] embrace yourself this is a number two [8:41] Peach and that is an Abomination unto [8:43] the Lord and as soon as it is labeled a [8:47] number two it can lose 23ds of its [8:50] market value to a farmer even though its [8:51] contents are the same and many retailers [8:54] have standards even more strict than the [8:56] USDA all of which is why so many Peach [8:59] end up being thrown on the ground to rot [9:02] and that should not be how we treat our [9:03] fruit it should only be how we treat our [9:06] celebrities so help me God Channing [9:08] Tatum you lose one muscle fiber on that [9:12] six-pack and I will personally toss you [9:13] into Hollywood's landfill you keep it [9:16] tight tatm # keepit tight tatm do you do [9:21] it and and the thing is we don't just [9:25] reject food because of how it looks [9:27] sometimes we do it out of pure fear [9:30] according to one estimate 91% of us have [9:32] thrown out food that's past it cell by [9:34] dates because we're afraid it's not safe [9:36] and I am absolutely part of that 91% [9:39] we're weirdly reverent towards these [9:41] dates even when they make no sense used [9:44] by sell bu and nothing but just a date [9:49] and this is all the same brand this is [9:50] all the same brand this is not only the [9:52] same brand but also the same 2% so what [9:56] does this show us this shows there's [9:58] complete confus Fusion out there the [10:01] only labels on food more meaningless [10:03] than those are the ones on smernoff [10:04] bottles that say triple distills vodka [10:07] oh really Smur off so you ran the potato [10:10] sweats through the tube sock two extra [10:12] times thanks for spending the [10:15] effort we naturally assume sell by dates [10:18] reflect a uniform standard of safety but [10:21] that is not true well actually it has [10:23] nothing to do with safety at all it's [10:25] just a manufacturer's best guess of when [10:27] that food is going to be the freshest [10:28] and at the the best quality exactly [10:31] those dates are decided on by [10:33] manufacturers and if I were a food [10:35] manufacturer I would make those dates as [10:36] tight as possible to convince people to [10:39] buy a new one of my products because [10:41] unlike Apple I can't just create a new [10:43] operating system that suddenly means [10:45] your old cereal is incompatible with [10:47] your [10:48] mouth and the truth is with the [10:51] exception of baby formula the federal [10:53] government does not require any food to [10:55] carry an expiration date and state laws [10:57] vary widely with 9 States not requiring [11:00] any date labels at all which means most [11:03] of the time sell by dates are one of [11:05] those things that look official but you [11:07] can probably ignore like a child in a [11:09] cop uniform just just stop it Tyler I'm [11:13] not under a West you're under a [11:18] West but but because we think those [11:21] dates are real many supermarkets throw [11:23] expired food out even before it sell by [11:26] date and they don't donate it for what [11:29] they think is a pretty good reason do [11:31] you have that's close dated or any calls [11:34] no we can't do that you can't no it's a [11:36] food health and safety it's a safety [11:38] that you can do you guys donate it then [11:40] or you don't donate it no so if it goes [11:44] right in the garage it goes stra in the [11:45] garbage yeah can't do it because get too [11:48] many lawsuits there's too many lawsuits [11:49] have you guys been sued before I don't [11:51] know to tell you the truth but it's a [11:53] health and safety issue that's a common [11:56] misconception we all think that if you [11:59] don't donate food and someone gets sick [12:00] you could get sued I thought that until [12:02] earlier this week but we looked into it [12:05] and couldn't find a single case where a [12:07] food donor has been sued it doesn't [12:09] happen it's a false fear like believing [12:12] if you go in the water after eating [12:13] you'll get a cramp and drown yeah it [12:16] turns out that isn't true either this [12:18] week has blown my [12:20] mind because the system is if you donate [12:24] food to a charity you're covered by the [12:26] Emerson act which says you cannot be [12:28] sued if you make a Food donation in good [12:30] faith you presumably get the same cover [12:32] with donating clothes even though in [12:35] some cases there you really should be [12:37] sued donating a cow neck sweater [12:41] hello the homeless Liv in shelters not 4 [12:47] [Applause] [12:49] 2008 but here's here's the problem even [12:53] if more people understood that there [12:54] would still be food that doesn't get to [12:56] people who need it for a critical reason [12:59] Harold Mardy of HMC Farms says he'd like [13:02] to donate more of his peaches to the [13:04] food banks but getting it into the hands [13:07] of somebody to eat it isn't isn't free [13:10] there's got to be an economic incentive [13:11] to move more of this into an Avenue that [13:13] food banks could take advantage of it's [13:15] a lot easier and cheaper just to Bas it [13:18] throw it away and that may be the [13:21] biggest issue of all for businesses [13:23] donating food is genuinely expensive [13:25] you've got to box it store it uh [13:27] coordinate deliveries for it there's a [13:28] lot of overheads and you cannot fault [13:30] companies for caring about their bottom [13:32] line in the same way you can't fault a [13:34] dog for caring about licking its balls [13:37] it's what dogs do it's natural and dog [13:40] balls are [13:41] delicious companies in their defense are [13:45] not Charities which is why they should [13:47] be incentivized to donate food with tax [13:49] breaks large corporations already get [13:51] one but annoyingly that same break for [13:53] small businesses is not a permanent part [13:56] of the tax code meaning that Congress [13:58] has to keep renewing it and that's a [13:59] problem because Family Farms or local [14:02] restaurants may not know if they're [14:03] going to get that break at the end of [14:05] the year and therefore whether donating [14:07] food will be financially viable for them [14:09] it's a ridiculous system which probably [14:12] prevents a lot of food from being [14:14] donated so here is the good news in [14:16] February this year a congressman [14:18] proposed HR 644 the fighting hunger [14:22] incentive act uh to make that tax break [14:24] permanent here actually is one of the [14:26] bill sponsors it's time to get rid of [14:28] these short-term f Embrace long-term [14:30] Solutions this legislation simply makes [14:33] the provisions permanent and when you [14:35] think about it that's important because [14:37] when something's not permanent it [14:38] affects our Behavior that's why we all [14:40] treat rental cars like we're in a fast [14:42] and furious movie oh I'm sorry sharp [14:45] turn ahead get ready to drift Kia [14:48] sento [14:50] woo now now you'll be happy to hear that [14:53] bill passed the house however by the [14:56] time it did it had been bundled together [14:58] with other unpaid for tax breaks and [15:00] retitled the America gives more act but [15:03] still that original provision was in [15:06] there which means this problem has been [15:07] solved the show is over we can roll [15:10] credits and all live happily ever after [15:13] right no not right because when the bill [15:17] got to the Senate they and I honestly [15:19] did not know this was even possible they [15:22] removed everything from inside the bill [15:25] retitled it the trade facilitation and [15:27] trade Enforcement Act of 2015 15 and [15:29] refilled it with completely different [15:31] language concerning border control and [15:33] US Israeli relations which meant yes HR [15:36] 644 past just with a completely [15:39] different title and completely different [15:41] contents it's like going to a restaurant [15:43] ordering a veggie burger and having the [15:45] way to say here you go uh we made it out [15:47] of meatloaf and we call it a [15:49] waffle and then you can't even say well [15:53] I don't want this give it to someone who [15:55] needs it because they can't cuz they [15:57] don't know whether or not they'll get a [15:58] fuing tax credit for it and look the the [16:03] insane [16:05] thing is everyone basically agrees small [16:08] businesses should get tax incentives to [16:11] donate food so we have to find a way to [16:13] pass that but even if we do it will be [16:15] one small part of what needs to be a [16:18] much bigger solution from resolving to [16:20] eat uglier fruit uh to taking expiration [16:24] dates with a pinch of salt to no longer [16:26] worrying about getting sued by [16:27] high-powered lawyers rep representing [16:29] the hungry and and we all have to [16:33] address our relationship with food waste [16:37] or at the very least our cheeseburger [16:39] commercials are going to have to get a [16:40] lot more [16:41] honest what's more American than a [16:44] cheeseburger this cheeseburger loaded [16:46] with a hot dog and potato chips in the [16:48] hands of a model in a hot tub in a [16:51] pickup truck on an aircraft carrier in [16:53] front of the Statue of Liberty I'll tell [16:56] you what's more American if that cheese [16:59] Burgers than thrown away along with 15 [17:01] other cheeseburgers in front of a food [17:03] insecure family of four who frankly [17:05] cannot fuing believe their eyes as they [17:07] stand on top of 14 tons of perfectly [17:10] edible if aesthetically unappealing [17:11] fruits and vegetables which in turn sits [17:14] on top of 80 tons of dairy products all [17:16] one day past their arbitrary sell by [17:18] date all of which sits inside a tear [17:21] rolling down Abraham Lincoln's face on [17:23] Mount Rushmore which is now nearly chin [17:25] deep and millions of discarded [17:27] cheeseburgers all gradually decomposing [17:29] and emitting flammable methane in red [17:32] white and blue that ising [17:36] American behind car junr in Hardies