Cracked
Court precedent shields law enforcement from liability during active attacks because police have no legal constitutional duty to protect individuals without an explicit prior promise.
AI-assisted summary of Why The Cops Won't Help You When You're Getting Stabbed — original source. Check the original for full context.
Source published:
Key ideas
- Subway passenger Joe Lozito subdued armed spree killer Maksim Gelman in 2011 after two armed NYPD officers hid inside the engineer's compartment during the attack. (0:02)
- Despite Lozito sustaining multiple stab wounds to the head and arms, initial media reports falsely credited the two concealed police officers with capturing the attacker. (3:24)
- Lozito's lawsuit against the NYPD was dismissed based on legal precedent establishing that police departments have no constitutional duty to protect individual citizens. (3:24)
- Following the attack, Lozito was discharged after only two days and denied HIV or hepatitis screenings by his health insurance provider as not 'medically necessary.' (3:24)
Detailed notes
## Background This video was published on YouTube by the comedy and commentary channel Cracked on October 30, 2017. According to the page description, it explores the reality of stopping a psycho on a violent killing spree and how the experience is far from as awesome as people imagine.
## TL;DR Commuter Joe Lozito recounts his harrowing survival during Maksim Gelman's 2011 New York City stabbing spree, where he had to subdue the armed killer on a subway car using desperate MMA-inspired moves. Although two armed NYPD officers were hiding inside an adjacent compartment specifically looking for Gelman, they stayed locked away until Lozito had disarmed the attacker and suffered multiple stab wounds. Lozito's life was saved not by police, but by a fellow commuter using paper napkins to stem the bleeding, while officers initially took public credit for the capture. When Lozito sued the NYPD, his case was dismissed due to established legal precedent like Castle Rock v. Gonzales, which establishes that law enforcement has no constitutional duty to protect individual citizens.
## Atmosphere & style The piece carries a gritty, blunt, and darkly sardonic tone, juxtaposing online action-hero fantasies against the terrifying, bloody chaos of real-world violence. Lozito narrates his ordeal with raw candor and gallows humor, detailing the shock of warm blood and horrific injuries without romanticizing his survival. As the focus shifts from physical combat to the legal betrayal by the justice system, the mood darkens into a bitter, sobering wake-up call about institutional failure and self-reliance.
## Bulletin - [00:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0&t=2s) Subway passenger Joe Lozito subdued armed spree killer Maksim Gelman in 2011 after two armed NYPD officers hid inside the engineer's compartment during the attack. - [03:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0&t=204s) Despite Lozito sustaining multiple stab wounds to the head and arms, initial media reports falsely credited the two concealed police officers with capturing the attacker. - [03:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0&t=204s) Lozito's lawsuit against the NYPD was dismissed based on legal precedent establishing that police departments have no constitutional duty to protect individual citizens. - [03:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0&t=204s) Following the attack, Lozito was discharged after only two days and denied HIV or hepatitis screenings by his health insurance provider as not 'medically necessary.'
## Key takeaways - [00:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0&t=2s) Joe Lozito encountered spree killer Maksim Gelman at the end of Gelman's 28-hour stabbing spree on a New York City subway car. - [00:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0&t=2s) Two armed NYPD officers were hiding inside the train engineer's compartment specifically waiting to intercept Gelman. - [00:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0&t=2s) When Gelman banged on the engineer's door, the officers spoke to him from behind the locked barrier rather than emerging to apprehend him. - [00:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0&t=2s) Gelman turned to Lozito with an eight-inch knife and announced, 'You're going to die,' before launching into a violent attack. - [01:35](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0&t=95s) Lozito relied on improvised MMA techniques and body weight to tackle Gelman after missing a single-leg takedown. - [01:35](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0&t=95s) During the struggle on the floor, Lozito sustained severe head wounds and lacerations to his thumb and tricep before disarming Gelman. - [01:35](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0&t=95s) The sequestered NYPD officers only emerged to arrest Gelman after Lozito had already disarmed and pinned him. - [01:35](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0&t=95s) Neither officer provided first aid; Lozito's life was saved by fellow passenger Alfred Douglas ('Napkin Man'), who used paper napkins to compress his head and body wounds. - [03:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0&t=204s) Initial news coverage credited the two NYPD officers with subduing the attacker, completely erasing the civilian intervention. - [03:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0&t=204s) In grand jury testimony, an officer admitted to remaining hidden because he suspected Gelman might be armed with a firearm. - [03:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0&t=204s) Lozito acted as his own attorney pro se in a lawsuit against the NYPD after his initial filing was thrown out. - [03:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0&t=204s) A judge ruled that while Lozito's account was credible, the city was not liable because officers owed no 'special duty' of protection without prior direct promises. - [03:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0&t=204s) The dismissal followed Supreme Court precedent, including Castle Rock v. Gonzales, which established that police have no constitutional obligation to protect citizens. - [03:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0&t=204s) Lozito warns against heroic civilian combat fantasies, noting that the reality includes rapid blood loss, systemic legal abandonment, and institutional apathy.
## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0&t=2s) The Subway Encounter with Maksim Gelman
Online comment sections on mass shootings and violent rampages are routinely flooded with self-proclaimed tough guys who insist they would effortlessly disarm an attacker with martial arts. Joe Lozito introduces his experience by contrasting those absurd internet fantasies with the grim reality of surviving an actual spree killer. On an early morning commute in 2011, Lozito found himself at the tail end of Maksim Gelman’s notorious 28-hour stabbing spree across New York City. Having left home too early to read the morning newspaper, Lozito had no idea that Gelman was already a heavily publicized fugitive. When a visibly intoxicated man stumbled erratically onto the subway car, Lozito simply brushed it off as an ordinary morning in New York City.
Lozito was seated right next to the engineer’s compartment, separated from the cabin only by a partition wall. Gelman walked up to the door and began violently pounding on it, demanding entry: “Let me in.” Unbeknownst to Lozito at that instant, two armed police officers were waiting inside that very compartment specifically to intercept Gelman if he boarded that train. Despite recognizing the wanted killer, the officers made no move to burst out and apprehend him. Instead, an officer merely asked from behind the door, “Who are you?” Gelman retorted, “I'm the police,” to which the officer answered, “You're not the police.”
Rather than intervening to protect the subway car or capture a dangerous fugitive, the officers remained sequestered behind the locked door. Left entirely unhindered, Gelman turned away from the cabin door, confronted Lozito, drew an eight-inch knife, and flatly announced: “You're going to die.” With that, he lunged forward and plunged the blade into Lozito.
```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Train Cabin Standoff and Attack Flow accDescr: Sequence showing police hiding in the train compartment while Gelman attacks Joe Lozito. subgraph Inside_Compartment["Inside Engineer's Compartment"] direction TB Cops["Two Armed NYPD Officers<br/>(Lying in wait for Gelman)"] end subgraph Train_Car["Train Car Interior"] direction TB Gelman["Maksim Gelman<br/>(Spree Killer with 8-inch Knife)"] Joe["Joe Lozito<br/>(Seated Passenger)"] end
Gelman -->|"Pounds on door"| Inside_Compartment Inside_Compartment -.->|"Talks through door but hides"| Gelman Gelman -->|"Turns and attacks"| Joe ```
[01:35](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0&t=95s) The Brutal Struggle, Takedown, and Aftermath
Thrust suddenly into a life-or-death confrontation, Lozito had to react despite possessing no combat training beyond being an avid viewer of mixed martial arts. As Gelman pulled his arm back to deliver another blow, Lozito attempted an MMA-style single-leg takedown. The maneuver did not execute cleanly; Lozito aimed too high and grabbed Gelman around the waist rather than by the leg, leaving his head completely exposed. As a result, Gelman stabbed him repeatedly in the skull. Lozito explains that survival in such an ordeal often comes down to raw mass and sheer desperation rather than polished skill: “The good news if you aren't a badass is that you can have no idea what you're doing but still succeed on dumb luck and balls.”
Because Lozito was significantly heavier than Gelman, the impact brought both men crashing down to the train floor, with Lozito landing on top. Gelman, however, maintained a tight grip on his weapon. Lozito reached with his left hand to trap Gelman’s knife hand, but missed twice—suffering deep defensive lacerations across his thumb and his left tricep. On his third attempt, Lozito seized the attacker’s wrist and slammed it against the floor, forcing Gelman to release the knife. Only after Lozito had completely immobilized the spree killer and was rapidly bleeding out did the two sequestered police officers finally step into the car to make the arrest. An officer tapped Lozito on the shoulder and said, “You can get up now, we got him.”
Lozito felt no sharp pain initially, only the warm sensation of blood pouring out of his wounds, which felt like warm shower water streaming across his scalp and neck. Even then, the officers offered no first aid or physical assistance. Lozito's life was saved by fellow passenger Alfred Douglas, whom Lozito dubbed "Napkin Man," who rushed over and pressed napkins into Lozito's open head and body wounds to staunch the bleeding until Lozito lost consciousness from severe blood loss.
- Lozito took Gelman down by the waist after failing to grab the leg, enduring repeated stab wounds to the head. - Lozito's left thumb and left tricep were slashed before he managed to slam Gelman's wrist to disarm him. - Police offered no physical help or medical assistance immediately following the scuffle. - Alfred Douglas ("Napkin Man") used ordinary paper napkins to stem Lozito’s massive hemorrhaging until Lozito passed out.
[03:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0&t=204s) The Legal Battle and No Duty to Protect
Upon regaining consciousness in the hospital, Lozito discovered to his utter frustration that early press coverage credited the two NYPD officers with single-handedly subduing the attacker, completely erasing both Lozito and Alfred Douglas from the narrative. The full truth of the officers' conduct came out during a grand jury hearing, where one officer admitted under oath: “I started to come out, I opened the door, but I thought Gelman had a gun, so I closed the door and stayed inside.” Lozito found this excuse absurd, pointing out that if trained officers believed an unstable murderer armed with a firearm was riding an occupied subway car bound for Times Square, their duty should have been to stop him immediately rather than hide behind a locked door.
Outraged by their conduct, Lozito sued the NYPD. After his initial filing was thrown out, he represented himself pro se and succeeded in bringing the case before a judge. Although the presiding judge openly validated his account by ruling, “Mr. Lozito's version of the story sounds highly credible and his version of events rings true,” the lawsuit was dismissed. The court found that because officers made no specific guarantees beforehand, they were shielded from liability under the law: “No direct promises of protection were made to Mr. Lozito, nor were there direct actions taken to protect Mr. Lozito prior to the attack. Therefore a special duty did not exist.”
Lozito’s legal challenge hit a brick wall due to established precedent, most notably the 2005 U.S. Supreme Court decision in *Castle Rock v. Gonzales*. In that case, a woman sued the Castle Rock Police Department after officers repeatedly refused to enforce a restraining order against her estranged husband, who had kidnapped their children and ultimately murdered them; the Supreme Court ruled that the police force had no constitutional mandate to protect individuals.
Lozito wraps up his story with a blunt warning to armchair commentators who fantasize about heroically handling a violent attacker: - His health insurance forced him out of the hospital within two days, and doctors refused to administer HIV or hepatitis screenings following the stabbing because the tests were deemed not "medically necessary." - Civilians caught in active violence must understand that the law does not require law enforcement to intervene on their behalf. - Survivors should never expect the police to protect them, should not expect public credit for stopping an attacker, and had better hope there is a bystander like Napkin Man nearby to keep them from bleeding out.
## Notable quotes > [01:35](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0&t=95s) The good news if you aren't a badass is that you can have no idea what you're doing but still succeed on dumb luck and balls. — Joe Lozito
> [03:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0&t=204s) No direct promises of protection were made to Mr. Lozito, nor were there direct actions taken to protect Mr. Lozito prior to the attack. Therefore a special duty did not exist. — The presiding judge
## Mentioned Joe Lozito, Maksim Gelman, Alfred Douglas, New York City, NYPD, Times Square, Castle Rock v. Gonzales, Castle Rock Police Department, U.S. Supreme Court
## Video description Ever wondered what it's like to stop a psycho on a killing spree? It isn't as awesome as you'd think.
SUBSCRIBE HERE: http://goo.gl/ITTCPW
Join us Mondays, Tuesdays, Fridays, and Sundays at 1pm EST for brand new Cracked shows and series!
CLICK HERE for more YOUR BRAIN ON CRACKED: https://youtu.be/mjWqtWntljg CLICK HERE for WE REMADE THE BATMAN FOR ONLY $20: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MOFBV_TnO4 CLICK HERE for more HONEST ADS: https://youtu.be/gmQE4qdb9fg CLICK HERE for more CANONBALL: https://youtu.be/tclMdfFcxmQ CLICK HERE for more WAIT A MINUTE… WHAT?: https://youtu.be/xadKIhnwNMs
See more http://www.cracked.com LIKE us on: http://www.facebook.com/cracked FOLLOW us on: http://www.twitter.com/cracked FOLLOW us on: http://cracked.tumblr.com
#police #cops #uvalde
[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0)