Carlin Urges US to Seize 3 Million Acres of Golf Courses for Housing

A War on Homelessness — iStateOfMind3

iStateOfMind3

Homelessness persists across the US because corporate and political elites cannot profit from solving it, even as more than three million acres remain hoarded for golf courses.

AI-assisted summary of A War on Homelessness — original source. Check the original for full context.

Source published:

Key ideas

  • Public policy framing in the United States relies almost exclusively on the metaphor of war, yet homelessness is omitted because neither corporations nor corrupt politicians stand to profit from solving it. (0:01)
  • Market-driven society tends to commodify deprivation and substitute commercial consumerism for direct aid, satirized as lifestyle periodicals like Better Crates and Cartons. (1:42)
  • The housing crisis is fundamentally a lack of physical shelter ('houselessness') rather than an emotional abstraction, yet construction is perpetually thwarted by NIMBY zoning resistance. (3:21)
  • More than 17,000 U.S. golf courses monopolize over 3 million acres (4,820 square miles)—an area equal to two Rhode Islands and Delaware—that could be reclaimed for low-income housing alongside repurposed cemetery land. (5:53)

Detailed notes

## Background This video was published on YouTube by the channel iStateOfMind3 on January 28, 2013. In the description, the uploader introduces the performance with the brief remark: "It's better than what we have now - No plan at all."

## TL;DR George Carlin examines America's obsession with declaring domestic wars, arguing that a "War on Homelessness" has never materialized because no corporate or political elites stand to profit from solving the issue. After satirizing market-driven solutions through a parody lifestyle magazine, he reframes the crisis as "houselessness" and exposes the deep hypocrisy of suburban NIMBY zoning attitudes toward shelters and prisons. To solve the shortage of physical shelter, Carlin proposes confiscating millions of acres consumed by elitist golf courses and repurposing municipal cemeteries into public housing.

## Atmosphere & style The performance is biting, acerbic, and fueled by righteous indignation, characteristic of Carlin's sharp social commentary. His delivery balances rapid-fire wit and cynical realism with pitch-black absurdity, taking genuine societal neglect and confronting it directly. Watching the routine feels like an exhilarating, provocative indictment of American consumerism and suburban hypocrisy, shifting seamlessly from grim diagnostic truths to hilarious, calculated outrage.

## Bulletin - [00:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=1s) Public policy framing in the United States relies almost exclusively on the metaphor of war, yet homelessness is omitted because neither corporations nor corrupt politicians stand to profit from solving it. - [01:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=102s) Market-driven society tends to commodify deprivation and substitute commercial consumerism for direct aid, satirized as lifestyle periodicals like Better Crates and Cartons. - [03:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=201s) The housing crisis is fundamentally a lack of physical shelter ('houselessness') rather than an emotional abstraction, yet construction is perpetually thwarted by NIMBY zoning resistance. - [05:53](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=353s) More than 17,000 U.S. golf courses monopolize over 3 million acres (4,820 square miles)—an area equal to two Rhode Islands and Delaware—that could be reclaimed for low-income housing alongside repurposed cemetery land.

## Key takeaways - [00:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=1s) Declaring war is the solitary rhetorical framework and metaphor society relies on to address domestic public problems. - [00:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=1s) Homelessness lacks a dedicated federal campaign because there are no lucrative corporate contracts or political kickbacks to be extracted from solving it. - [00:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=1s) If a mechanism existed for corporate elites and politicians to pocket millions of dollars, the streets would be cleared of homelessness overnight. - [01:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=102s) American consumer culture treats niche periodical publications as the ultimate badge of demographic arrival and recognition. - [01:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=102s) Satirical commercial solutions, like using glossy magazines as crate insulation, highlight the absurdity of applying free-market capitalism to human survival needs. - [03:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=201s) The crisis should be termed 'houselessness' rather than 'homelessness,' recognizing that shelter requires tangible physical structures rather than abstract emotional concepts. - [03:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=201s) NIMBY ('Not In My Backyard') sentiments routinely block the construction of essential social facilities like halfway houses and rehabilitation clinics. - [03:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=201s) Communities demand harsher criminal justice measures and more prisons, yet paradoxical NIMBY attitudes reject building correctional facilities locally. - [03:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=201s) Economically strained working-class communities tolerate hazardous military installations solely out of desperation for local employment. - [05:53](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=353s) Golf is characterized as an elitist, racially exclusionary pastime of wealthy businessmen that wastes vast geographical tracts on a trivial game. - [05:53](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=353s) Over 17,000 U.S. golf courses occupy roughly 4,820 square miles, enough surface area to fit two Rhode Islands and a Delaware dedicated to low-income housing. - [05:53](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=353s) Cemeteries represent an antiquated waste of municipal land that could be reclaimed for civic housing while recycling human remains for agricultural phosphorus.

## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=1s) The American Metaphor of War and the Absence of a War on Homelessness

George Carlin opens by taking aim at American foreign and domestic priorities, remarking that the nation always seems overdue to bomb some small country equipped with only a marginally effective air force and drop high explosives on helpless civilians who hold no real grudge against the United States. He observes that America appears fundamentally incapable of existing without an adversary to harass, noting that the country could barely wait for the Cold War to wrap up before finding an excuse to go play with military hardware in the desert sand. Carlin points out that whenever the nation is not busy invading sovereign states or setting them ablaze from the skies, it turns that same destructive impulse inward by constantly declaring domestic wars.

Domestically, declaring war serves as the sole rhetorical framework society understands for addressing civic ills. Carlin lists the familiar litany of campaigns—the War on Poverty, the War on Crime, the War on Litter, the War on Cancer, and the War on Drugs—before pointing out the glaring omission of any campaign aimed at those living on the streets. Carlin explained the cold financial logic behind the omission: “Nobody stands to get rich off of that problem.” He asserts that if a program could be engineered where corporate elites and corrupt politicians could pocket a few million dollars apiece, the streets of America would be cleared almost overnight.

- Carlin notes that declaring war is the only rhetorical tool society uses: “It's the only metaphor we have in our public discourse for solving a problem.” - Identified domestic "wars": poverty, crime, litter, cancer, and drugs. - The fundamental barrier to ending homelessness is financial: without lucrative corporate contracts or political kickbacks, institutional interest evaporates.

---

[01:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=102s) Better Crates and Cartons: A Satirical Business Solution

Turning toward commercial culture, Carlin jokes that the first step to addressing the plight of the homeless would be granting them their own specialized magazine, since having a niche publication is the defining American hallmark of cultural arrival. He points out that groups and micro-demographics everywhere possess dedicated periodicals, from *Working Mother* and *Black Enterprise* to publications tracking niche outdoor hobbies like skydiving, snowmobiling, and bungee jumping. He mocks the hyper-specialization of print media by singling out *Walking* magazine, enacting a suburbanite marveling over an issue whose lead story amounts to instructions on putting one foot in front of the other.

Extending this satire into a dark parody of free-market ingenuity, Carlin suggests naming the homeless lifestyle publication *Better Crates and Cartons*. Beyond providing reading material, the glossy pages could double as insulation for personal clothing or help patch drafts in improvised cardboard shelters. Carlin captures the cynical tone of free-market fixes: “A good sound practical conservative American business solution.” Through this caricature, he illustrates how market-driven society prefers commodifying human misery or treating basic survival needs as an afterthought rather than confronting deprivation head-on.

- Examples cited of hyper-specific publications: *Working Mother*, *Black Enterprise*, *Hispanic Business*, and *Walking*. - Parodied utility: using read magazines as insulation inside clothing and plugging holes in piano shipping crates.

---

[03:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=201s) Houselessness, NIMBYism, and the Hypocrisy of Zoning

Carlin pivots to semantics, arguing that the public must first reframe the issue from "homelessness" to "houselessness." He emphasizes that a home is merely an abstract concept, an emotional setting, or a state of mind, whereas what people actually lack is tangible, physical shelter. The fundamental obstacle to constructing this shelter is the entrenched attitude of NIMBY—"Not In My Backyard." While citizens pay lip service to helping the needy, they routinely mobilize against halfway houses, addiction rehab clinics, or assisted housing within their own neighborhoods, exposing the empty rhetoric surrounding American generosity.

This neighborhood protectionism extends even to institutions that the public vocally demands, such as prisons. Carlin ridicules the paradox of citizens chanting to lock up offenders while adamantly refusing correctional facilities in their vicinity. He points out that living next to a high-security prison would logically create the safest neighborhood imaginable, as street criminals would actively avoid the premises and escaped convicts would immediately flee the zip code rather than linger to inspect neighborhood real estate. The only neighborhood intrusion citizens happily accept without protest is a military installation, because self-interest and local employment trump all health hazards. Carlin observed, “Working people have been fucked over so long in this country, those are the kind of decisions they're left to make.”

- Conceptual distinction: shelter requires physical buildings, whereas "home" remains an emotional abstraction. - Institutional hypocrisy: universal public demand for prisons paired with total local refusal to host them. - Selective zoning tolerance: military bases with hazardous or nuclear payloads are welcomed solely for job creation.

---

[05:53](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=353s) Reclaiming Golf Courses and Cemeteries for Affordable Housing

To solve the housing crisis once and for all, Carlin proposes seizing golf courses and repurposing the land for low-income residential development. He decries golf as an arrogant, elitist, and racially exclusionary pastime played predominantly by wealthy white businessmen who use fairways to negotiate backroom deals and carve up the country's wealth. He mocks the players' colorful trousers, tiny hats, and golf carts, ridiculing the sheer physical waste of dedicating immense acreage to hitting a tiny ball with a crooked stick only to walk after it and hit it again.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Land Reallocation Proposal accDescr: Diagram illustrating George Carlin's satirical proposal to convert golf courses and cemeteries into housing and agricultural resources. subgraph Current["Current Land Misuse"] GC["17,000+ Golf Courses<br/>(3+ Million Acres)"] CEM["Cemeteries<br/>(Burial Grounds)"] end subgraph Proposed["Proposed Social Utility"] HOU["Houseless Communities<br/>(Size of 2 Rhode Islands & Delaware)"] AGR["Agricultural Phosphorus<br/>(Recycled into Soil)"] end GC -->|"Reclaim for housing"| HOU CEM -->|"Plow into rivers/farmland"| AGR ```

Carlin underscores the vast scale of this wasted geography: with over 17,000 courses averaging 150 acres each, the sport monopolizes more than 3 million acres, or roughly 4,820 square miles. Carlin stressed the potential of this acreage: “You could build two Rhode Islands and a Delaware for the homeless on the land currently devoted to this meaningless, mindless, arrogant, elitist, racist, racist.” He suggests banishing these players to miniature golf to negotiate obstacles like windmills instead. As a closing proposal, Carlin targets cemeteries as another antiquated waste of premium municipal real estate. He derides the medieval superstition of segregating corpses on vast tracts of land, suggesting instead that the deceased be plowed under into waterways to replenish phosphorus reserves for agriculture, concluding that genuine environmental recycling must begin with our own priorities.

- Golf course land usage statistics cited: over 17,000 facilities in the U.S. averaging 150 acres each, totaling over 3 million acres (4,820 square miles). - Land equivalency: sufficient surface area to accommodate two Rhode Islands and one Delaware. - Cemetery proposal: convert burial grounds into housing and recycle human remains for agricultural phosphorus.

## Mentioned George Carlin, Working Mother, Black Enterprise, Hispanic Business, Walking, Rhode Island, Delaware

## Video description It's better than what we have now - No plan at all.

[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw)

中文简报

卡林呼吁美国没收300万英亩高尔夫球场用于建房 全美无家可归问题之所以持续存在,是因为企业与政治精英无法从中获利,而与此同时,超过三百万英亩的土地却被高尔夫球场独占。 乔治·卡林探讨了美国热衷于宣示国内各种“战争”的执念,指出“向无家可归宣战”从未出现,是因为没有任何企业或政治精英能从解决该问题中牟利。在借由一本恶搞生活方式杂志讽刺了由市场主导的解决方案后,他将这场危机重新界定为缺乏实体居所的“无房危机”,并揭露了郊区邻避主义在区划规划中对待庇护所和监狱的深度虚伪。为解决实体居所短缺的问题,卡林主张没收精英高尔夫球场占用的数百万英亩土地,并将市政墓地改建为公共住房。 美国的公共政策话语几乎完全依赖“战争”隐喻,但无家可归问题却被排除在外,因为无论是企业还是腐败政客都无法从解决这一问题中获利。 (0:01) 市场驱动的社会往往将贫困匮乏商品化,并以商业消费主义替代直接救助,这被讽刺性地具象化为如《更好的板条箱与纸箱》这般的生活方式期刊。 (1:42) 住房危机在本质上是缺乏物理避风港(“无房”状态)而非某种情感抽象,但相关建设却屡屡受到邻避主义区划阻力的遏制。 (3:21) 全美超过1.7万座高尔夫球场垄断了逾300万英亩(约4820平方英里)的土地——相当于两个罗德岛州加一个特拉华州的面积——这些土地连同改建后的墓地本可收回用于建设低收入住房。 (5:53)

Reading summary

George Carlin argues that the systemic failure to resolve homelessness in America stems from the absence of corporate profit incentives and pervasive suburban hypocrisy, contrasting widespread civic neglect with the lavish land allocated to elite recreation. Profit Motives and the Rhetoric of Domestic Warfare (0:01) Carlin observes that the United States fundamentally relies on war as its primary metaphor for civic problem-solving, citing historical campaigns such as the wars on poverty, crime, litter, cancer, and drugs. However, he highlights the glaring absence of a war on homelessness, attributing this omission entirely to financial logic: without opportunities for corporate contractors and politicians to pocket millions in profits or kickbacks, institutional motivation to clear the streets evaporates. The Houselessness Distinction and NIMBY Hypocrisy (3:21) Carlin argues that the public must reframe the issue as "houselessness" rather than homelessness, explaining that a home is merely an abstract emotional idea, whereas individuals on the street lack physical shelter. He contends that the primary barrier to building this shelter is the entrenched "Not In My Backyard" (NIMBY) mentality, where citizens profess sympathy for the needy but actively mobilize against halfway houses, addiction clinics, and assisted housing in their own neighborhoods. This protectionism extends to penal policy, where citizens vocally demand mass incarceration while refusing correctional facilities nearby. Carlin points out that while an adjacent maximum-security prison would logically deter local crime, residents reject it, yet simultaneously welcome hazardous military bases because economic neglect leaves working-class communities desperate for local employment. Satirizing Free-Market Approaches to Human Misery (1:42) Turning to consumer culture, Carlin parodies the American tendency to equate cultural validation with commercial media representation. He highlights how the market produces hyper-specialized print publications for every niche demographic—such as Working Mother, Black Enterprise, and Walking magazine—and suggests that the homeless should receive their own publication, titled Better Crates and Cartons. Carlin presents this satirical concept as a practical conservative business solution, noting that the physical magazine could double as clothing insulation or patch holes in cardboard shipping crates. Through this caricature, he illustrates how market-driven societies favor commodifying suffering and offering superficial consumer fixes over addressing fundamental material deprivation. Reclaiming Golf Courses and Cemeteries for Housing (5:53) To directly address the shelter deficit, Carlin proposes confiscating golf courses and converting the land into low-income housing communities. He condemns golf as an arrogant, elitist, and racially exclusionary pastime played by wealthy businessmen conducting backroom deals, ridiculing the disproportionate geography dedicated to chasing a ball with a crooked stick. Citing municipal scale, Carlin notes that the United States contains more than 17,000 golf courses averaging 150 acres each, monopolizing over 3 million acres—or roughly 4,820 square miles. He calculates that this space is large enough to construct two Rhode Islands and a Delaware for the unhoused, suggesting players be relegated to miniature golf. He further proposes repurposing cemeteries, labeling the preservation of corpses on prime real estate an archaic superstition, and suggests plowing remains into waterways and farmland to recycle phosphorus back into agricultural soil. Through sharp satirical hyperbole, Carlin frames homelessness not as an intractable social condition, but as the direct outcome of corporate greed, exclusionary zoning, and spatial waste. By contrasting the vast acreage reserved for elite sports and deceased bodies with the lack of basic human shelter, the argument underscores an indictment of American civic priorities.

精炼阅读摘要

乔治·卡林(George Carlin)通过讽刺手法抨击了美国对无家可归问题的漠视,认为解决该问题的根本障碍在于缺乏商业暴利驱动,并揭露了城市规划中普遍存在的邻避主义与资源错配。 战争隐喻的泛滥与无家可归议题的缺失 (0:01) 卡林指出,美国无论在对外军事行动还是处理国内公共议题时,“宣战”几乎是社会唯一能够理解的话语框架。国内先后发起了向贫困、犯罪、垃圾、癌症和毒品宣战等一系列行动,却唯独没有针对露宿街头群体的全国性战役。卡林认为这一缺席背后的逻辑非常现实,即没有任何人能从解决该问题中获取暴利。他声称,如果能设计出一套让企业高层与政客每人捞取数百万美元回扣的项目,街头的露宿现象几乎可以在一夜之间被彻底清除。 以商业化包装苦难的市场荒谬性 (1:42) 在探讨商业文化时,卡林讽刺地提出应为无家可归者设立专属的生活方式杂志《更好的板条箱与纸箱》(Better Crates and Cartons),以此模仿美国各类小众群体的文化认同模式,例如《上班族母亲》(Working Mother)、《黑人企业》(Black Enterprise)以及《步行》(Walking)杂志。卡林将这种设想戏称为一种务实的美国保守派商业解决方案,讽刺杂志光面纸不仅能用于阅读,还能塞入衣物保暖或修补纸箱避难所的漏洞。通过这一夸张设想,他批判了自由市场宁愿将人类的困境商品化,也不愿正视并解决基本生存匮乏的冷酷心态。 住房定义、邻避主义与分区规划的双标 (3:21) 卡林在语义层面上主张将“无家可归”(homelessness)重新定义为“无房可居”(houselessness)。他强调“家”只是一种抽象的情感或精神概念,而处于困境的人群真正缺少的是实体的、有形的房屋庇护所。然而,修建这些庇护所面临着严重的邻避主义(NIMBY)阻力,公众虽然口头支持帮助弱势群体,却在自己社区内极力抵制中途宿舍、戒毒诊所或保障性住房的落地。 卡林进一步指出了公众诉求与规划落地的悖论:大众一方面高呼严惩罪犯并要求修建更多监狱,另一方面却坚决不准监狱建在自家附近。卡林讽刺称,住在高度戒备的监狱旁反而是最安全的,因为罪犯会主动避开该区域,越狱者也会立刻逃离该邮政编码区域。与此相对的是,社区唯独能够毫不犹豫接受可能带来环境危险的军事基地进驻,其核心原因在于军事设施能提供就业机会,工薪阶层在长期的利益受损下只能被迫以此类生计为优先考量。 收回高尔夫球场与墓地以重构土地利用 (5:53) 为了从根本上解决住房危机,卡林主张强制没收高尔夫球场,将其改建为低收入人群的住宅社区。他将高尔夫运动定性为富裕白人商人的排他性特权消遣,斥责其占用了过度庞大的土地资源。根据卡林列举的统计数据,全美拥有超过1.7万个高尔夫球场,平均占地150英亩,总计霸占了300多万英亩(约合4820平方英里)的土地,其面积足以容纳两个罗德岛州和一个特拉华州。他提议让球手改打迷你高尔夫,将原本的球场空间全面释放给低收入住房建设。 作为延伸方案,卡林还将墓地列为城市昂贵不动产的另一大浪费形式。他批评将遗体长期圈禁在大片土地上的旧习俗,提议应将死者遗体犁入水网土壤中,以此为农业耕作补充磷资源,从而在资源配置上实现实质性的生态循环。 卡林的整场论述以荒诞反讽的形式解构了社会资源分配的底层逻辑,其提出的强行征用高尔夫球场和改变殡葬用途等主张虽属黑色幽默与修辞夸张,但有力揭示了现行制度在商业利益挂帅与邻避偏见阻碍下,迟迟未能将基本生存保障置于富裕阶层消遣之上的深层矛盾。

Detailed notes — zh

## Background 该视频由 YouTube 频道 iStateOfMind3 于 2013 年 1 月 28 日发布。视频简介简明扼要地写道:“这总比我们现在的状态好——完全没有任何计划。” ## TL;DR 传奇脱口秀大师乔治·卡林(George Carlin)在演出中辛辣解构了美国热衷对外轰炸与对内“宣战”的政治修辞,直指所谓“向无家可归宣战”从未出现是因为其无利可图。他纠正该现象的本质并非情感修辞上的“无家可归”(Homelessness),而是实实在在的物资短缺——“无房可归”(Houselessness),并无情戳穿了社区在面对戒毒所与监狱时极度伪善的邻避心理(NIMBY)。作为解决方案,卡林荒诞而精准地提出应全面征用全美上万座被富豪精英霸占的高尔夫球场以及大面积墓地,直接用于为底层民众建造低成本保障性住房。 ## Atmosphere & style 现场弥漫着乔治·卡林标志性的尖锐批判与黑色幽默气息,语速连贯、辞锋如刀,每一次逻辑反转都能引发全场雷鸣般的笑声与掌声。卡林通过肢体模仿和愤怒的咆哮,将严肃的阶级压迫与住房危机化作一连串荒诞不经的笑料,既充满对特权阶层的讽刺与蔑视,又透出对劳工阶级深沉的愤懑与同情。整场表演听起来如同一记清脆的社会耳光,将观众从美国式虚伪道德的温床中彻底震醒。 ## Bulletin - [00:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=1s) 美国公共话语充斥着对外军事干涉与对内的“宣战”口号(如向贫困、毒品、犯罪宣战),但唯独没有“向无家可归宣战”,核心原因在于政客和跨国企业无法从中谋取巨额商业利益。 - [01:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=102s) 卡林提出应将“无家可归”(Homelessness)正名为“无房可归”(Houselessness),直指底层群体缺失的是物理遮蔽居所,而非抽象的心理概念。 - [04:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=258s) 美国社会普遍存在虚伪的邻避效应(NIMBY),居民坚决抵制救助站和戒毒所,却因就业妥协而狂热欢迎伴随辐射与核风险的重度军事基地进驻。 - [05:53](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=353s) 全美逾 17,000 个高尔夫球场占地超 300 万英亩(约合两个罗德岛州加一个特拉华州的面积),卡林提议将其全部征用以建设平价保障住房,并同步翻耕墓地释放土地资源。 ## Key takeaways - [00:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=1s) 美国社会具有好战成瘾的对外干涉惯性,热衷于在实力弱小的国家制造轰炸,并迫不及待地将新式军事装备投入实战。 - [00:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=45s) 国内政治话语极度依赖“宣战”作为解决社会问题的唯一隐喻,涵盖毒品、犯罪、贫困等议题。 - [01:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=70s) 无家可归现象被政策制定者长期漠视的根本原因,是该群体缺乏供企业高管和政客贪污牟利的商业价值。 - [01:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=102s) 美国过剩的杂志出版文化暴露了资本主义市场过度细分的荒谬,甚至走路、打手枪等基础行为都有专属刊物。 - [02:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=145s) “无家可归”这一术语掩盖了物质匮乏的现实,准确的概念应当是缺乏实质建筑掩蔽的“无房可归”。 - [03:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=180s) 邻避效应(NIMBY)揭示了所谓“美国式慷慨”的虚伪,居民坚决反对戒毒所、半途之家和平民救助所建在自家社区附近。 - [04:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=258s) 公众一方面呼吁建立更多监狱关押犯人,另一方面却极力阻挠监狱建在本地;但实际上越狱者的唯一目标是迅速逃离,绝不会在周边犯罪。 - [04:55](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=295s) 邻避标准存在严重双重性:民众拒绝慈善福利设施,却因工作机会而狂热欢迎带有严重放射性与核武器威胁的军事基地。 - [05:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=330s) 美国蓝领劳工阶层在长期遭受经济压迫后陷入绝境,不得不为了生计而在自身健康安全与微薄收入之间做出无奈妥协。 - [05:53](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=353s) 高尔夫是一项充斥傲慢、特权与精英主义的运动,成为富裕白人男性政商私相授受与封闭分肥的社交遮羞布。 - [06:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=385s) 全美拥有超过 17,000 个高尔夫球场,占地逾 4,820 平方英里,其优良土地资源足以彻底解决全国性住房危机。 - [07:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=435s) 高尔夫运动在观赏性上枯燥至极,其球场存在明显的阶级排他性与隐性种族歧视,有钱人完全可以改玩室内迷你高尔夫代替。 - [08:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=510s) 传统公墓长期圈占城镇优质土地源于中世纪的宗教迷信,应将其推平翻耕,并将骨灰中的磷元素回收用于农业生产。 ## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=1s) 宣战癖好与“无家可归”背后的利益缺失 乔治·卡林(George Carlin)以极具讽刺意味的口吻切入谈话,调侃起所谓的“美国价值观”。他指出,美国似乎早就该去轰炸某个空军力量微不足道的小国了,因为距离上次向毫无防备、素无恩怨的平民投下烈性炸药已经过了好几周。在他看来,美国最擅长的事情莫过于“在别人的国家炸出大坑”。美国人骨子里好战成瘾,甚至迫不及待地盼着冷战结束,好立刻跑到中东的沙漠里玩弄新式军事玩具。而当美国不去侵略主权国家或在空中肆意纵火时,就会转而在国内向各种社会现象“宣战”。 卡林敏锐地指出,在公共话语体系中,“宣战”成了美国人解决任何问题的唯一隐喻。美国先后发起过“向贫困宣战”、“向犯罪宣战”、“向乱扔垃圾宣战”、“向癌症宣战”以及“向毒品宣战”,但唯独从来没有人提出过“向无家可归宣战”。卡林直击问题本质:那是因为这件事情无利可图。没有任何权贵或跨国企业能从流浪汉身上发家致富。乔治·卡林辛辣地讽刺道:“如果能找到一个让企业肥猪和政客们每人贪污几百万美元的解决办法,我向你保证,美国街头的流浪汉问题很快就会被清理得干干净净。” ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 美国公共话语中的宣战隐喻与利益驱动 accDescr: 展示美国为何热衷宣战却忽略无家可归问题的逻辑流程 subgraph ForeignWar ["对外军事行动"] A["热衷武力干涉"] --> B["轰炸弱小国家 / 沙漠军事玩具"] end subgraph DomesticWar ["对内隐喻宣战"] C["遇到不合心意的社会问题"] --> D["启动政治口号:向XX宣战"] D --> E["贫困 / 犯罪 / 毒品 / 垃圾 / 癌症"] end subgraph ProfitDriven ["利益筛选机制"] E -.->|存在利益输送空间| F["设立庞大预算与法案"] D -.->|无利可图| G["无家可归问题 (Homelessness)"] G --> H["彻底被政客与企业漠视"] end ``` - **对外干涉的周期性冲动**:讽刺美国必须定期向防空力量薄弱的国家投掷炸药,以满足军工与好战心理。 - **公共话语中的“战争”隐喻**:涵盖贫困、犯罪、垃圾、癌症与毒品,唯独遗漏流浪群体。 - **资本与政策挂钩**:解决社会问题的动力完全取决于企业高管与政客是否有利可图。 --- ### [01:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=102s) 专属杂志与重新定义“无房可归” 面对严峻的流浪汉生存境况,卡林抛出了一个充满荒诞色彩的“美式商业解决方案”:给无家可归者创办一本专属杂志。他讽刺道,在美国,只要一个群体或一项活动有超过四个人参与,就必然会诞生一本对应的刊物,比如《在职母亲》(Working Mother)、《黑人企业家》(Black Entrepreneur)或《西班牙裔商业》(Hispanic Business),甚至连跳伞、登山、雪地摩托、打手枪乃至“走路”这种基础行为都有专刊——现实中确实存在一本名为《行走》(Walking)的杂志。因此,给流浪汉办一本名为《更好的箱子与纸板》(Better Crates and Cartons)的杂志再合适不过;他们读完之后,还能顺手把纸张塞进衣服里保暖,或者拿去糊住他们赖以生存的钢琴包装木箱。 卡林随后话锋一转,指出要从根本上讨论这个问题,首先必须纠正语言上的伪善:“无家可归”(Homelessness)这个词本身就是一种语言掩饰,它的本质应当是“无房可归”(Houselessness)。“家”是一种抽象的概念、一种心境或一个环境,而这些人真正匮乏的是实实在在、具有物理实体的“房屋”。然而,要在现实中推进廉租房的建设却困难重重,因为美国社会普遍存在着极其虚伪的“邻避效应”(NIMBY,即“别建在我家后院”)。人们绝不允许戒毒中心、半途之家或平民救助所建在自己的社区周围。乔治·卡林借此痛斥社会宣扬的所谓博爱精神:“人们不希望任何东西建在自己附近,尤其是那些可能帮助别人的设施——这就是我们一直被灌输的所谓伟大的美国慷慨精神的一部分。” - **杂志文化的荒谬性**:讽刺市场过度细分带来的荒诞感,例如连迈开步子走路都能刊登专题指南文章。 - **概念重塑(Houselessness vs. Homelessness)**:剥除“家”的抒情修辞,直指底层民众缺失遮风避雨居所的物资匮乏现实。 - **邻避心理(NIMBY)**:社区居民一边在口头上支持救助,一边坚决抵制任何公益福利建筑进入自身视野。 - **对“美国式慷慨”的解构**:卡林讽刺道,如果想知道美国有多慷慨,不妨先试着找一个印第安人问问,或者随机找一个黑人家庭调查真实感受。 --- ### [04:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=258s) 荒唐的邻避心理与军事基地的特例 在进一步拆解邻避主义的荒诞逻辑时,卡林以“修建监狱”为例展开了嘲弄。全社会都在高喊通过把人关进监狱来解决一切矛盾,每个人都呼吁建造更多监狱,可一旦选址确定在自家附近,居民便立刻抗议。卡林反驳道,监狱建在社区反而能使该地成为最安全的无犯罪区域,因为吸毒者、强盗、皮条客和妓女绝不会跑到监狱大门口游荡。即便真的有罪犯越狱,他们脑子里唯一想的事情就是逃得越远越好,绝不可能留在监狱旁边的社区闲逛或者顺便了解当地的房地产行情。 然而,这种对周边建设的狂热排斥却在一种设施面前彻底失效——那就是军事基地。卡林指出,只要政府宣布在社区建设军事基地,当地居民不仅毫无怨言,反而欢欣鼓舞。背后的核心驱动力就是“就业机会”与“自私自利”。哪怕基地里堆满了核武器与放射性威胁,民众也会为了生计妥协,心甘情愿地说“只要能给我一份工作,我宁可挨点辐射”。乔治·卡林感叹美国蓝领阶层的处境时直言:“在这个国家,劳动人民被肆意玩弄践踏了太久,以至于他们最终只能做出这种无奈的妥协。” - **越狱逃犯的行为逻辑**:越狱者的本能是迅速脱离警戒范围,邻避者对监狱周边治安恶化的恐慌纯属无稽之谈。 - **邻避标准的双重性**:拒绝福利与改造机构,却全力拥抱高危的重度军事设施。 - **劳工阶层的经济困局**:生计受制于军工复合体所带来的底层就业机会,不得不在健康安全与微薄收入之间做绝望的取舍。 --- ### [05:53](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=353s) 终极解决方案:征用高尔夫球场与墓地 为彻底解决低成本保障房的用地难题,卡林提出了他的终极设想:直接征用全美所有的高尔夫球场。他愤怒地痛斥高尔夫是一项“毫无意义、毫无头脑、傲慢自大且充满精英色彩的运动”,其核心目的无非是让穿着花花绿绿裤子的富裕白人男性商人们聚在一起,关起门来瓜分国家利益。这项运动的设计本身就充斥着狂妄——一颗小小的球却霸占着庞大的土地。卡林列举了详尽的统计数据:全美拥有超过 17,000 个高尔夫球场,平均每个球场占地超过 150 英亩,总面积高达 300 多万英亩(约合 4,820 平方英里)。这些被高尔夫占用的优良土地,足以安置两个罗德岛州加上一个特拉华州规模的低成本住房。 在卡林眼中,高尔夫不仅涉嫌隐性种族歧视——乡村俱乐部里唯一的黑人几乎全是端盘子的侍者——其观赏性与参与性更是枯燥乏味至极,在电视上看高尔夫转播“就像看着苍蝇交配一样无聊”。他用刻薄的肢体语言模拟了挥杆、走路追球、再挥杆的重复过程,并建议这些阔佬们不如去玩摆着风车障碍的迷你高尔夫。在收尾部分,卡林进一步拓宽了拆迁改建的范围,将矛头对准了占用大量宝贵土地的公墓。乔治·卡林严厉抨击把逝者长期圈占在城镇特定区域的传统:“这到底是一种什么中世纪的、迷信的宗教陈腐观念?把这些地全耕了,把骨灰残渣冲进美国的江河湖泊,农业耕作正需要那些磷元素呢;如果要搞资源回收,我们就得动点真格的。” | 对比维度 | 现状:高尔夫球场 | 卡林的改造方案:无家可归者保障房 | |:--- |:--- |:--- | | **占用土地规模** | 全美超 17,000 个球场,面积超 300 万英亩(4,820 平方英里) | 相当于容纳两个罗德岛州与一个特拉华州面积的保障居住区 | | **主要服务人群** | 富裕白人男性、政商交易者、乡村俱乐部精英 | 流浪汉、退伍贫民及无房底层弱势群体 | | **社会功能性质** | 排他性社交、高能耗绿化、枯燥低智的特权娱乐 | 解决生存基本需求、消除街头无房危机、提升土地公用价值 | | **替代分流手段** | 让富豪改玩带有风车装置的室内迷你高尔夫(Mini-golf) | 同步推平旧墓地,翻耕土地并回收磷元素用于农业肥料循环 | - **高尔夫球场的数据事实**:超过 17,000 处场地,单场均超 150 英亩,占地逾 4,820 平方英里。 - **高尔夫文化的虚伪本质**:特权着装、排他性阶级交易、缺乏实质技术含量的走步运动。 - **墓地土地浪费问题**:将墓葬制度斥为中世纪迷信产物,呼吁释放土壤并将其中的磷资源回收反哺农业生产。 ## Notable quotes > [00:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=1s) 如果能找到一个让企业肥猪和政客们每人贪污几百万美元的解决办法,我向你保证,美国街头的流浪汉问题很快就会被清理得干干净净。 — 乔治·卡林 > [01:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw&t=102s) 人们不希望任何东西建在自己附近,尤其是那些可能帮助别人的设施——这就是我们一直被灌输的所谓伟大的美国慷慨精神的一部分。 — 乔治·卡林 ## Mentioned 乔治·卡林, 《在职母亲》, 《黑人企业家》, 《西班牙裔商业》, 《行走》, 《更好的箱子与纸板》, 罗德岛州, 特拉华州 ## Video description It's better than what we have now - No plan at all. [Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lncLOEqc9Rw)

Source quotes

[0:01] 乔治·卡林: 如果能找到一个让企业肥猪和政客们每人贪污几百万美元的解决办法,我向你保证,美国街头的流浪汉问题很快就会被清理得干干净净。 [1:42] 乔治·卡林: 人们不希望任何东西建在自己附近,尤其是那些可能帮助别人的设施——这就是我们一直被灌输的所谓伟大的美国慷慨精神的一部分。

Original transcript

[0:01] By the way, speaking of American values, [0:03] aren't we about due to start bombing [0:04] some small country that only has a [0:06] marginally effective air force? [0:08] Seems to me like we're a couple of weeks [0:10] overdue to drop high explosives on [0:12] helpless civilians. People who have no [0:14] argument with us whatsoever. I think we [0:16] ought to be out there doing what we do [0:17] best, gang, making big holes in other [0:20] people's countries. [0:22] I hate to be repetitious, but God, we [0:23] are a war-like lot, you know? We can't [0:26] stand not to be [ __ ] with somebody. [0:28] We couldn't wait for that Cold War to be [0:29] over, could we? Just couldn't wait for [0:31] that Cold War to be over so we could go [0:32] and play with our toys in the sand. Go [0:34] play with our toys in the sand. And when [0:36] we're not invading some sovereign nation [0:39] or setting it on fire from the air, [0:41] which is more fun, then we're usually [0:43] declaring war on something here at home. [0:46] Did you ever notice that? We love to do [0:47] that, don't we? We love to declare war [0:49] on things here in America. Anything we [0:51] don't like about ourselves, we have to [0:52] declare war on it. Don't do anything [0:55] about it. We just declare war on it. [0:57] We got a war, it's the only it's the [0:59] only metaphor we have in our public [1:01] discourse for solving a problem. It's [1:03] called declaring a war. We got a war on [1:05] poverty, the war on crime, war on [1:07] litter, the war on cancer, the war on [1:09] drugs. But you ever notice there's no [1:11] war on homelessness, is there? Nah. No [1:13] war on homelessness. You know why? [1:14] There's no money in that problem. [1:16] There's no money in that problem. NOBODY [1:19] STANDS [1:21] IT'S TRUE. [1:22] Nobody stands to get rich off of that [1:24] problem. You could find a solution to [1:26] homelessness with a corporate swine and [1:28] the politicians could steal a couple of [1:30] million dollars each. You'd see the [1:31] streets of America begin to clear up [1:33] pretty goddamn quick. I'll guarantee you [1:35] that. I will GUARANTEE [1:37] THAT. NOW, [1:39] SO [1:42] I GOT AN IDEA FOR THE HOMELESS. You know [1:43] what they ought to do? You know what [1:44] they ought to do? Give the homeless [1:46] their own magazine. [1:48] Give them their own magazine. It would [1:51] make them feel better for one thing. [1:53] That's a sure sign of making it in this [1:54] country. Every group in this country [1:56] that makes it and arrives at a certain [1:58] level has its own magazine. You have [2:01] Working Mother magazine, Black [2:03] Entrepreneur magazine, Hispanic business [2:05] magazine. In fact, any activity, any [2:09] activity engaged in by more than four [2:11] people [2:12] in this country has got a [ __ ] [2:13] magazine devoted to it. [2:15] Skydiving, mountain climbing, [2:17] snowmobiling, backpacking, bungee [2:19] jumping, [2:21] duck hunting, shooting someone in the [2:23] [ __ ] with a dart gun, jerking off, [2:24] they probably have a magazine for that. [2:26] I'm sure they have. I know THEY HAVE A [2:27] MAGAZINE. WALKING. [2:30] WALKING! [2:32] THERE'S ACTUALLY A [ __ ] MAGAZINE [2:35] CALLED WALKING. [2:38] LOOK, DAN, THE NEW WALKING IS OUT. [2:42] HERE'S A GOOD ARTICLE, PUTTING ONE FOOT [2:45] IN FRONT OF THE OTHER. [2:48] GIVE THEM THEIR OWN MAGAZINE. [2:51] GIVE THEM. [2:53] Give the homeless their own magazine. [2:54] You know what you call it? Better Crates [2:56] and Cartons. [2:59] Then when they get finished reading it, [3:00] they can use it to line their clothing. [3:03] That's a good sound business solution. [3:06] That's kind of answer you get from a [3:07] conservative American businessman. He'd [3:09] say, "Yeah, let them read it. When they [3:11] get finished reading it, they can use it [3:12] to plug up the holes in them piano [3:13] crates they all seem to like to live [3:15] in." A good sound practical conservative [3:18] American business [3:21] solution. I'll tell you what they ought [3:23] to do about homelessness. First thing, [3:24] change the name of it. Change the name [3:26] of the condition. It's not homelessness, [3:29] it's houselessness. It's houses these [3:31] people need. A home is an abstract idea. [3:34] A home is a setting. It's a state of [3:36] mind. These people need houses, [3:38] physical, tangible structures. But where [3:40] are you going to put them? Where are YOU [3:41] GOING TO BUILD THEM? Nobody wants you to [3:43] build low-cost housing near their house. [3:45] People don't want it near them. We got [3:47] something in this country, you've heard [3:48] of it, called NIMBY, N I M B Y, not in [3:51] my backyard. [3:53] People don't want any kind of social [3:54] help located anywhere near them. You try [3:57] to open up a halfway house. Try to open [3:59] up a rehab center for drugs or alcohol. [4:01] Try to build a little home for some [4:02] [ __ ] people who want to work their [4:04] way into the community. PEOPLE SAY, "NOT [4:06] IN my backyard." People don't want [4:08] anything near them, especially if it [4:11] might help somebody else. Part of the [4:13] great American spirit of generosity [4:15] we're always told about. [4:18] Big, generous American nation. Ask an [4:20] Indian about that. Ask an Indian how [4:23] generous this country is, if you can [4:24] find one. You got to locate the Indian [4:26] first. We've made them just a little [4:28] difficult to find. Or if you need [4:30] current data, select a black family at [4:32] random and ask them how generous this [4:34] country has been. People don't want [4:36] anything near them, even if it's [4:37] something they believe in, something [4:39] they think society needs, like prisons. [4:42] EVERYBODY WANTS THAT, RIGHT? EVERYBODY [4:43] WANTS MORE PRISONS. That's the new [4:45] answer to all of our problems. LOCK A [4:46] LOT OF [ __ ] UP. [4:48] EVERYBODY WANTS MORE PRISONS. THEY SAY, [4:49] "BUILD MORE PRISONS!" [4:52] BUT NOT HERE. [4:54] BUT WHY NOT? What's wrong? What's the [4:56] problem? What's wrong with having a [4:57] prison in your neighborhood? Well, it [4:58] seems to me like it would make it a [4:59] pretty crime-free area, don't you think? [5:02] You think a lot of crackheads and [5:03] muggers and pimps and hookers are going [5:04] to hang around in front of a [ __ ] [5:05] prison? [5:07] [ __ ] THEY AIN'T COMING ANYWHERE [5:08] NEAR IT. [5:09] WHAT'S WRONG WITH THESE PEOPLE? All the [5:11] criminals are locked up behind the [5:12] walls. If a couple of them do break out, [5:13] what do you think they're going to do? [5:14] Hang around? [5:17] Check real ESTATE TRENDS? [ __ ] [5:20] THEY'RE [ __ ] GONE. [5:22] THAT'S THE WHOLE IDEA OF BREAKING OUT OF [5:23] PRISON IS TO get the [ __ ] as far away as [5:25] you possibly can. [5:27] Not in my backyard. People don't want [5:30] anything near them. [5:32] Except military bases. They don't mind [5:35] that, do they? No, they like that. Give [5:36] them an army base, makes them happy. [5:38] Why? Jobs. JOBS. SELF-INTEREST. EVEN IF [5:41] THE BASE is loaded with nuclear weapons, [5:43] they don't give a [ __ ] [5:45] They'd say, "Well, I'll take a little [5:46] radiation if I can get a job." [5:48] Working people have been [ __ ] over so [5:50] long in this country, those are the kind [5:51] of decisions they're left to make. [5:53] I got just the place for low-cost [5:56] housing. I have solved this problem. I [5:59] know where we can build housing for the [6:00] homeless. [6:02] Golf courses. [6:04] Perfect. [6:06] Golf courses. [6:08] Just what we need. Plenty of good land [6:12] in nice neighborhoods, land that is [6:14] currently being wasted on a meaningless, [6:17] mindless activity [6:19] engaged in primarily by white, [6:21] well-to-do male businessmen who use the [6:24] game to get together to make deals to [6:25] carve this country up a little finer [6:27] among themselves. I am getting tired. [6:31] REALLY TIRED. [6:33] [Applause] [6:37] I AM GETTING TIRED OF THESE golfing [6:39] [ __ ] [6:41] in their green pants and their yellow [6:44] pants and their orange pants and their [6:47] precious little hats and their cute [6:49] little golf carts. It is time to reclaim [6:53] the golf courses from the wealthy and [6:55] turn them over to the homeless. Golf is [6:56] an arrogant, [6:58] elitist game and it takes up entirely [7:00] too much [ __ ] room in this country. [7:03] Too much [ __ ] room in this country. [7:07] It is [7:10] It is an arrogant game on its very [7:12] design alone. Just the design of the [7:14] game speaks of arrogance. THINK OF HOW [7:16] BIG a golf COURSE IS. [7:18] THE BALL IS THAT [ __ ] BIG! [7:21] WHAT DO THESE PINHEADED PRICKS NEED WITH [7:22] ALL THAT LAND? [7:24] THERE ARE OVER 17,000 golf courses in [7:26] America. They average over 150 acres [7:29] apiece. That's over 3 million acres. [7:31] That's 4,820 [7:33] square miles. You could build two Rhode [7:35] Islands and a Delaware for the homeless [7:37] on the land currently devoted to this [7:39] meaningless, mindless, arrogant, [7:41] elitist, racist, racist. There's another [7:45] thing. The only blacks you'll find in [7:47] country clubs are carrying trays. And a [7:50] boring game for boring people. Did you [7:53] ever watch golf on television? It's like [7:55] WATCHING FLIES [ __ ] [7:59] AND A MINDLESS GAME. [8:01] MINDLESS. Think of the intellect. Think [8:04] of the intellect it must take to draw [8:06] pleasure from this activity. [8:08] Hitting a ball with a crooked stick [8:11] AND THEN [8:13] WALKING AFTER IT. [8:15] AND THEN [8:17] HITTING IT AGAIN! [8:19] I SAY, "PICK IT UP, [ __ ] YOU'RE [8:20] LUCKY YOU FOUND THE [ __ ] THING. [8:22] PUT IT IN YOUR POCKET AND GO THE [ __ ] [8:23] HOME. [8:24] GO THE [ __ ] HOME, YOU'RE A WINNER!" [8:27] NO. [8:28] [Music] [8:29] NO CHANCE OF THAT HAPPENING. DORKO IN [8:32] THE plaid knickers is going to hit it [8:33] again and walk some more. [8:35] Let these rich [ __ ] play [8:37] miniature golf. Let them [ __ ] with a [8:39] windmill for an hour and a half or so. [8:42] See if there's any real skill among [8:44] them. [8:45] Now, I know there are some people who [8:47] play golf who don't consider themselves [8:49] rich. [8:50] [ __ ] them! [8:52] And shame on them for engaging in an [8:55] arrogant, elitist pastime. [8:58] Hey, here's another place we could put [9:00] some low-cost housing. Cemeteries. [9:04] There's another idea whose time has [9:05] passed. Saving all the dead people in [9:08] one part of town? [9:10] What the hell kind of a superstitious, [9:12] religious, MEDIEVAL [ __ ] IDEA IS [9:13] THAT? PLOW THESE [ __ ] UP. PLOW [9:16] THEM INTO THE STREAMS and rivers of [9:17] America. We need THAT PHOSPHORUS FOR [9:19] FARMING. IF WE'RE GOING TO RECYCLE, [9:22] LET'S GET SERIOUS. [9:26] THANK YOU.