金宇澄窦文涛论上海文化 称空间逼仄与商业契约催生精算人格

改革开放接近半个世纪,今天的上海比30年前,更好了吗?本地人吐露心声,可能更你想的不太一样!#中国经济  #消费 #经济  #社会观察 #消费 #圆桌派 #窦文涛 #上海 — 纪实万象

纪实万象

上海人被外界视为冷漠的边界感与精打细算,本质是近代租界避难潮的极端拥挤与工商业秩序共同倒逼出的生存理性,而语言壁垒的消解正加速其向规则主导的移民都市转变。

AI-assisted summary of 改革开放接近半个世纪,今天的上海比30年前,更好了吗?本地人吐露心声,可能更你想的不太一样!#中国经济 #消费 #经济 #社会观察 #消费 #圆桌派 #窦文涛 #上海 — original source. Check the original for full context.

Source published:

Key ideas

  • 上海人精打细算的性格根植于历史生存环境,从半两粮票、按只买菜到石库门公用水池的“一户一表”,无不体现拥挤空间下以明晰产权和规矩维系公共秩序的务实智慧。 (0:00)
  • 在人口流动和普通话普及的冲击下,上海话面临传承断层;金宇澄在创作小说《繁花》时通过剔除生僻怪字、全书不写“侬”字,成功实现了吴语韵味与全国读者阅读体验的平衡。 (18:18)
  • 海派文化深层奉行“精算师”与“不响”的情感逻辑,相较于北方的猛打猛冲,上海人在恋爱、婚姻与人际交往中普遍保持克制与边界感,鲜少歇斯底里或倾家荡产。 (34:41)
  • 上海著名的“穿睡衣上街”现象并非缺乏教养,而是极度逼仄的居住条件下将弄堂视为家庭内部延伸的独特公私界限划分。 (40:52)

Detailed notes

## Background 该视频由 YouTube 频道“纪实万象”于 2026 年 11 月 2 日发布。根据页面简介,本期内容选自窦文涛主持的谈话节目《圆桌派》,由窦文涛携手嘉宾围绕改革开放近半个世纪以来上海的城市变迁、本土市民心理及南北文化差异展开海阔天空的闲聊与社会观察。

## TL;DR 本期节目聚焦海派文化的内核演变与独特的市民心理机制。窦文涛与马未都、金宇澄、周轶君等嘉宾从半两粮票、石库门“一户一水表”、斜切带鱼等琐碎生活细节切入,深入剖析了上海人在局促空间中磨砺出的精细算计、边界感与克制自律。对话进一步探讨了普通话普及浪潮下沪语的式微、新移民的涌入对城市性格的重塑,以及海派文学与交往中“不响”的留白哲学。全片通过南北观念的生动碰撞,揭示了上海在商业文明与历史租界背景下形成的实用主义契约精神与独特的公私界限辩证法。

## Atmosphere & style 整场对话透着《圆桌派》标志性的松弛感与市井烟火气,既有文人老友围坐吃茶侃大山的温润怀旧,又充斥着南北生活习惯碰撞时的谐谑与机锋。马未都以北方人的粗线条与幽默不断调侃上海人的“精打细算”,而金宇澄和周轶君则从本地记忆与文学视角沉着拆解其背后的生存智慧与历史创伤,在捧腹笑谈与深沉反思之间收放自如。听者仿佛置身于梅雨季氤氲的上海弄堂,在细密的生活褶皱与微妙的情感留白中,真切感受到海派文化特有的克制、体面与幽微韵味。

## Bulletin - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=0s) 上海人精打细算的性格根植于历史生存环境,从半两粮票、按只买菜到石库门公用水池的“一户一表”,无不体现拥挤空间下以明晰产权和规矩维系公共秩序的务实智慧。 - [18:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=1098s) 在人口流动和普通话普及的冲击下,上海话面临传承断层;金宇澄在创作小说《繁花》时通过剔除生僻怪字、全书不写“侬”字,成功实现了吴语韵味与全国读者阅读体验的平衡。 - [34:41](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=2081s) 海派文化深层奉行“精算师”与“不响”的情感逻辑,相较于北方的猛打猛冲,上海人在恋爱、婚姻与人际交往中普遍保持克制与边界感,鲜少歇斯底里或倾家荡产。 - [40:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=2452s) 上海著名的“穿睡衣上街”现象并非缺乏教养,而是极度逼仄的居住条件下将弄堂视为家庭内部延伸的独特公私界限划分。

## Key takeaways - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=0s) 北方与上海的计量与消费观念截然不同,北方讲求按斤批量采购,而上海开埠以来的半两粮票与按件零售开创了适应当代节约理念的微观消费模式。 - [01:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=116s) 公共电话盯守计费与斜切带鱼在视觉上显大的做法,折射出上海人在有限资源下追求精准核算与体面生活的日常生存哲学。 - [04:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=270s) 从早年公交车到现代地铁,上海人提前换位准备下车的习惯体现了追求效率与降低公共摩擦的内化规则意识。 - [06:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=411s) 租界平整马路与传统城厢泥泞小路的对比,以及石库门建筑的兴起,催生了上海市民阶层凡事权衡“划算不划算”的实用理性。 - [12:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=728s) “八一三事变”后避难潮导致石库门极度分割混居,迫使居民在狭隘物理空间中筑起“各人自扫门前雪”的严密心理边界以避免冲突。 - [14:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=848s) 上海人行车认路不看东西南北而讲“大转弯(左转)”与“小转弯(右转)”,此类方言与认知差异曾频频造成南北交流的误解。 - [16:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=985s) 方言的核心价值在于独特的词汇系统而非单纯口音,随着全国人口涌入与写字楼普通话普及,沪语在年轻一代中正面临边缘化危机。 - [22:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=1328s) 上海在1843年正式开埠前就展现出强烈的重商嗅觉与移民属性,城市发展本质上依赖外来人口流动,而非原生宗族传统的排他性庇护。 - [24:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=1472s) “不响”是海派人际关系中极具深意的情绪省略与留白,往往蕴含着复杂的潜台词,与北方凡事言明的交流风格截然不同。 - [27:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=1652s) 知青插队岁月中上海青年的“不抱团”并非纯粹冷漠,而是近代商业社会把生存压力压在个人头上所形成的极端个人主义处世哲学。 - [29:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=1783s) 不同于北方官话或西南方言的书面亲和力,吴语方言写作存在天然字音障碍,金宇澄以规范汉字包裹吴语句式探索出了方言文学的折中改良范式。 - [33:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=1995s) 方言门槛的消退推动上海吸纳多元全国精英,促使整座城市在文化与生态上逐渐呈现出类似纽约的国际化气质。 - [36:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=2194s) 相亲角将子女学历、收入等硬性指标明码标价,印证了海派婚恋中抽离虚浮浪漫、将婚姻作为现实利益严密权衡的理性契约取向。 - [38:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=2298s) 王家卫式的情感拉扯与梅雨般的暧昧,体现了海派都市男女在精打细算、自我克制与低调掂量中展开的深层博弈。 - [40:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=2452s) 弄堂兼具公共通道与私密客厅的双重属性,弄堂内的松弛随性与步入社会的西装革履形成了上海人独特的公私空间辩证法。

## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=0s) "Shanghainese" vs. "Outsider" and the Legend of the Half-Tael Ration Coupon

The discussion opens with an examination of linguistic labels and regional perceptions, questioning whether being branded a "Shanghainese" was historically seen as derogatory or complimentary. In the North, the moniker often carried ambivalent undertones, while inside Shanghai itself, calling someone an "outsider" could easily carry an air of condescension. The speakers observe that intellectuals in Shanghai rarely use "outsider" in that dismissive way; rather, it was historically the petty bourgeoisie and urban working-class locals who leaned into the term. Northerners, generally accustomed to a broader, coarser style of living, often found the painstaking meticulousness of Shanghainese daily life baffling. Nothing symbolized this hyper-detailed lifestyle more vividly than Shanghai’s famous "half-tael" (半两) food ration coupon. To a Northerner visiting Shanghai during the planned economy era, seeing a half-tael grain coupon was an absolute shock, leaving them wondering what on earth could possibly be purchased with so minuscule an amount.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Grain Rationing and Consumption Styles accDescr: Flow comparing Northern bulk buying with Shanghai's half-tael individual portion system. subgraph North["Northern China (Coarse / Bulk)"] N1["Unit of Sale: Catty (斤)"] N2["Mooncakes: 3 catties at a time"] N3["Youtiao: 2 catties ordered"] N4["Wonton confusion: Ordering '1 catty' yields 20 bowls"] end subgraph Shanghai["Shanghai (Meticulous / Incremental)"] S1["Unit of Sale: Half-tael (半两)"] S2["Single mooncake: Sold individually (half-tael)"] S3["Single youtiao: Sold individually (half-tael)"] S4["Single wonton: Calculated by the half-tael"] end ```

The speakers explain that this fractional coupon captured a profound cultural divide between Shanghai and the North. In Beijing and northern provinces during the rationing era, grain and baked goods were sold strictly by the catty. Northerners would casually ask for two catties of deep-fried dough sticks or three catties of mooncakes. Shanghai, by contrast, pioneered selling items by the piece: a single mooncake or a single youtiao was measured out as exactly half a tael, and you could simply buy one for an afternoon snack. This discrepancy produced legendary culture-clash anecdotes, such as the uninitiated Northerner walking into a Shanghai eatery, ordering "one catty of wontons" under the assumption he was getting a single standard meal, only to be terrified when twenty individual bowls were lined up on his table. As one speaker reflects on this disparity:

> “So, the North and the South—no, not the South, but the North and Shanghai—actually have many differences in their daily habits.”

- **The Half-Tael Coupon (半两粮票):** A uniquely Shanghainese rationing artifact allowing citizens to purchase single snacks or pastries without spending a full-tael or catty coupon. - **Consumption Habits:** Northern buyers ordered staples by the catty (500 grams), whereas Shanghai markets accommodated single-item, half-tael (25 grams) micro-transactions.

---

[01:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=116s) Public Telephones, Taxi Crabs, and the Logic of Small Portions

The meticulous calculation of Shanghainese life extended far beyond food into everyday social interactions and municipal logistics. One speaker recalls using public telephone booths in Beijing versus Shanghai. In Beijing, making several calls consecutively would never draw administrative interference. But in Shanghai, an elderly neighborhood woman would stand vigil directly beside the booth; the instant you hung up after calling Dou Wentao and dialed Zhou Yijun, she would tap you on the arm and demand in Shanghainese whether you were finished and prompt you for the exact fare. While a Northerner might perceive that vigilant accounting as meddlesome or provocative enough to start an argument, in Shanghai it was simply practical, disciplined accounting: one, two, three, tallies settled instantly on the spot.

A similar ethos governs daily dining and shopping. A speaker recounts an encounter where a Shanghai taxi driver refused an out-of-the-way fare near shift-change, explaining that he had bought crabs to enjoy at home and pulling out a bag containing precisely two crabs. While Northerners buy mounds of food, Shanghai locals historically bought only tiny handfuls of greens at a time. The panel analyzes the practical roots of this habit: unlike northern cities where winters lacked fresh produce markets and families had to stockpile hundreds of pounds of Chinese cabbage and potatoes to survive, Shanghai enjoyed a mild, humid climate where leafy vegetables spoiled quickly without modern refrigeration. Neighborhood wet markets were ubiquitous—often right downstairs—allowing locals to purchase just enough for a single fresh meal. In hindsight, this thrift and portion control looks remarkably forward-thinking. As a speaker points out:

> “I think this fits today's lifestyle perfectly; it's eco-friendly.”

---

[04:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=270s) The Secret of the Diagonal Cut: Ribbonfish and Subway Efficiency

The dialogue turns to culinary geometry, specifically how ribbonfish (beltfish, 带鱼)—one of the few widely available saltwater fish across China in earlier decades alongside yellow croaker—is prepared. In the North, cooks cut ribbonfish into wide, square segments at least two or three inches long. In Shanghai, however, home cooks and restaurants invariably slice the fish on a steep diagonal. One speaker admits that the first time he encountered diagonally sliced ribbonfish, he felt subtly cheated: the angle created the optical illusion of a large fillet while containing very little actual meat.

Another panelist counters with the functional anatomy of the fish: when eating ribbonfish cut straight, stripping the prickliest top dorsal fin with your teeth is straightforward, whereas cutting it diagonally alters bone alignment and can leave broken bone fragments in the flesh. Still, both agree that cutting on the bias was primarily an ingenious aesthetic technique to make modest portions appear generous on the plate.

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: Ribbonfish Cutting Styles accDescr: Visual contrast between Northern straight-cut ribbonfish and Shanghainese diagonal-cut ribbonfish. subgraph NorthCut["Northern Style"] NC1["Straight 2-3 Inch Blocks"] --> NC2["Thick, obvious meat volume"] NC2 --> NC3["Dorsal fin strips off cleanly"] end subgraph ShanghaiCut["Shanghai Style"] SC1["Steep Diagonal Slice"] --> SC2["Elongated surface area (looks bigger)"] SC2 --> SC3["Thrifty portion stretched visually"] end ```

This calculated optimization appears everywhere in the city, including public transit etiquette. A speaker mentions how a migrant from Guangdong in the 1990s was amazed by Shanghai subway commuters: long before the train arrives at a station, passengers behind gently tap those in front, asking if they plan to alight and naturally swapping places in advance to ensure an unimpeded exit. The Shanghainese panelists recall that this pre-stop positional swapping was already second nature on city buses decades before subways existed. Rather than coldness, this reflex represents an ingrained social drive toward frictionless communal efficiency:

> “Things we’ve taken for granted are being viewed by them from an entirely different angle.”

---

[06:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=411s) Concessions, Shikumen, and the Mindset of "Is It Worth It?"

The panel traces this drive for order and value back to the historical formation of modern Shanghai. Before foreign concessions were carved out, the old walled city of Shanghai (上海老城厢) had no modern urban infrastructure; on rainy days the unpaved alleyways dissolved into thick mud, forcing the wealthy to travel exclusively by sedan chair or carriage. When residents stepped across into the concessions—such as Guangdong Road, Avenue Joffre in the French Concession, or the numbered thoroughfares—they were stunned by paved, smooth asphalt streets and horse carriages outfitted with shock-absorbing springs.

Along these modern grids arose the unique Shikumen (石库门) lilong housing: an architectural hybrid melding traditional Jiangnan courtyard compounds with Western row-house layouts and decorative motifs. Shanghai became an incubator for an entirely new urban way of living, contrasting sharply with traditional Chinese walled cities like Beijing with its uniform siheyuan courtyards.

This perpetual contrast and modernization forged a distinct civic psychology rooted in rigorous cost-benefit analysis. A speaker quotes writer Zhu Xing's observation that the moment a train from Nanjing filled with Shanghainese travelers, the air would buzz with their quintessential catchphrase: "Is it worth it or not?" (划算不划算 / 划得来划不来). As one host teasingly notes about their colleague Professor Xu Zidong:

> “Take our Professor Xu Zidong, for example; if you spend a few days with him, the phrase you hear most often is 'not worth it, not worth it, not worth it.'”

- **Urban Contrast:** The mud roads of the old Chinese walled city contrasted sharply with the paved, modern boulevards of the 19th- and early 20th-century concessions. - **Shikumen Architecture:** Emerged in massive numbers during the 1920s and 1930s as a structural hybrid combining Chinese residential privacy with Western decorative facades. - **The Core Calculation:** Exterior reserve paired with relentless internal cost-benefit calculation remains the defining cultural temperament of the city.

[09:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=545s) 石库门里的空间智慧与“不算计、不占便宜”的边界感

窦文涛谈起上海石库门这种中西合璧的建筑形式,感叹其对空间的利用达到了极致。他分享了自己最近入住一家由石库门改造的酒店的经历:穿过小天井便是紧凑的三层楼,底层空间虽然狭小,布局却极具巧思。窦文涛在录制节目时曾深入探访普通的石库门民居,发现里面挤住着许多寻常人家,最让他惊叹的是公用水池边那一排排水表,每个房间都单独安装了一块,彼此算得清清楚楚、绝不互相占便宜。对此,马未都打趣道:“要是换成我们北方人,恐怕早就打起来了。”

周轶君与金宇澄指出,这种锱铢必较正是上海人在拥挤环境中磨砺出的生存法则与强烈的边界意识。周轶君回忆母亲从小对她的严格家训:借别人的钱必须二十四小时内奉还;至于借钱给人,则要“救急不救穷”——别人遇到急事可以解囊相助,若只是单纯穷困没钱,断不可借。金宇澄补充分析道,老底子上海底层市民所谓的“排外”应当辩证看待,除了某种排他心态外,更多是因为北方人或外地人的行事作风在上海人眼里显得“不讲规矩、不靠谱”。

马未都笑称自己骨子里是个粗线条的北方人,年轻时曾与一位上海朋友同住数日,最后被对方精细周全的算计折服得“像个不会走路的孩子”。对方不仅提前把一切规划得滴水不漏,还会不断纠正他的各种疏漏,“你怎么能在这里买东西呢?”马未都感慨道:“虽然明知人家说的句句在理,但一个人成天这么动脑子算计,脑仁怎么受得了?”这种严谨精明的地域风气,构成了独特的文化魅力。

- 石库门建筑特色:天井狭小、纵向三层、空间利用极致,晚期多户混居催生了“一户一表”的精细管理。 - 周轶君母亲的家训:“借钱24小时内必须还,借急不借穷。”

[12:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=728s) 疏离的体面:外来者眼中的“安全岛”与冷感

窦文涛向金宇澄和周轶君倾诉了自己面对上海时的复杂心境。他承认自己由衷喜爱这座城市:不论是高楼大厦与法租界绿荫交织的风貌,还是高于北京的优质餐馆密度与市井生活气息,都让他萌生过定居的念头。然而,每当置身其中,他又总能体会到一种难以融入的疏离与冰冷。上海人那种客气而保持距离的交往方式,虽然理论上体现了尊重与边界感,但对于初来乍到的异乡人而言,难免会让人感到被排斥与孤单。

金宇澄解释道,外地人初到上海确实容易产生这种敏感,但习惯之后便会释怀,因为多数上海人本质上奉行的是“各人自扫门前雪”的自律。这种冷感根植于上海近现代的历史创伤:石库门原本是设计给单户家庭居住的,但在“八一三事变”(淞沪会战)爆发后,大量避难人群如潮水般涌入租界寻求庇护。作为乱世中的“孤岛”,租界的二房东与房东不得不将每一个角落分割转租。极度恶劣拥挤的居住环境,迫使居民必须筑起心理防线,互不干涉、互不打扰,以此维系最基本的日常秩序。

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 租界避难潮与石库门边界感的演变 accDescr: 展示战乱导致的人口激增如何塑造了石库门分租模式及上海人独特的心理边界。 subgraph 历史诱因 A["八一三事变爆发"] --> B["全国难民涌入租界'孤岛'"] end subgraph 居住形态演变 B --> C["石库门单户住宅被极度分割"] C --> D["二房东分租极小空间、公用水表"] end subgraph 文化与心理形成 D --> E["极端拥挤的物理环境"] E --> F["确立严格的行为界限与冷感"] F --> G["互不打扰、各管各事的市民性格"] end ```

[14:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=848s) 巨鹿路675号与“大转弯、小转弯”:语言误解中的双城记

马未都回忆起自己早年到访上海的难忘经历。他与金宇澄谈及位于巨鹿路675号的上海市作家协会,感叹上海道路之漫长远非北京胡同可比——在北京走完一条胡同不过十分钟,而在上海沿着一条马路走,往往走到双脚发酸也看不到门牌的尽头。八十年代初期他初抵申城,面临的最大障碍便是方言不通,当时许多上了年纪的老上海人完全不会讲普通话。

马未都讲起当年打出租车的一段生动轶事:彼时出租车司机属于高收入的体面行当,全由本地人包揽。马未都担心司机听不懂北方话,特意放慢语速指挥“向右拐”。不料司机顺口应了一句“转弯”(听音似“昨晚”或“左”),马未都急忙质问:“你怎么能往左转呢?”司机再三解释,马未都这才恍然大悟:上海人开车认路不讲东、南、西、北,也不说向左拐或向右拐,而是将向左转称为“大转弯”,向右转称为“小转弯”。司机当时只是用沪语重复了一遍“小转”,却因语音差异被外地乘客误当成了刁难。

- 巨鹿路675号:上海市作家协会所在地,承载着几代文人的历史记忆。 - 行车方位认知:北京人习惯看东南西北,上海人开车则以“大转弯”(左转)与“小转弯”(右转)来指示方向。

[16:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=985s) 方言式微与城市个性的消解

周轶君深有感触地表示,如今自己回到上海市区,在市中心几乎已经很难开口讲上海话。去商铺消费时,为了确保沟通顺畅,她往往第一句就会主动选择说普通话。窦文涛与马未都指出,推行普通话教育历经数代人,加上改革开放后全国人口的大规模流动,普通话已成为绝对主流,但这客观上也带来了城市个性的逐渐消亡。

马未都犀利地打了个比方:“如果把一个盲人带进一座城市,他耳朵里听到的全是一模一样的普通话,他甚至分不清自己到底离没离开家乡。”如果各地的建筑都变成了千篇一律的火柴盒高楼,而在广东听不到粤语、在上海听不到沪语,整座城市最鲜活的性格便荡然无存。现在连上海本土的“80后”、“90后”年轻人都习惯彼此讲普通话,许多孩子甚至连上海话的标准发音都无法准确拿捏。

金宇澄与马未都一致呼吁保护方言。马未都强调,方言绝不仅仅是北方人误以为的声调或口音差异(如河北话与北京话仅是语音微调),真正的优秀方言体系其精髓深植于词汇之中。以沪语为例,其用词系统完全独立且自成一家——比如上海人绝不会把装钱的夹子叫作钱包,而是称其为“皮夹子”,这类独特的词汇构成了地域文化的真正灵魂。

> “在我的理解中,方言的优越性就在于词汇,上海话在词汇上和其他地方是截然不同的。” —— 马未都

[18:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=1098s) 方言的式微与上海话的传承困境

窦文涛与嘉宾们从日常俗语与词汇切入,讨论起方言中蕴含的独特性。过去上海人管纸币叫“钞票”,甚至有老底子的切口“铜钿同筒”,小时候连皮夹子都没有,钱全散着塞在裤兜里。正是这种独具一格的语言选择构成了地方文化的个性。然而,从事文字工作的嘉宾深感痛心的是,上海话正面临迅速消亡的悲剧——现在的“80后”、“90后”乃至“00后”,大多只能听懂却不会讲,甚至到了下一代很可能彻底失传。

对于方言边缘化的原因,大家追溯到了20世纪90年代以来的社会变迁。当时房地产市场启动,大量外省富商涌入上海置业,往往一次性买下几十套房;与此同时,随着城市规模扩大,大批外地干部调入上海任职。这两大群体进入上海后没有学习方言的需求,再加上学校推行普通话教育,使得上海话在公共领域的存在感迅速降至冰点。

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 方言边缘化演变过程 accDescr: 展示上海话从过去的方言融和到如今被普通话全面取代的转变路径 subgraph Past ["历史常态:入乡随俗"] P1["渐进式移民流(商贩、文人)"] --> P2["方言交融(苏州/宁波/山东上海话)"] end subgraph Modern ["现代转变:标准语主导"] M1["90年代房产热与异地购房潮"] --> M3["写字楼与政商领域普通话普及"] M2["外地干部与高管集中调任"] --> M3 M4["学校普通话规范教育普及"] --> M5["新生代(80/90/00后)能听不能说"] end ```

在当下的高档写字楼里,由于汇聚了来自全国各地的白领精英,普通话已成为绝对的通用工作语言。外地人受过良好的普通话教育,自然会觉得“凭什么我来这里就非得讲你们的方言”。相比于民国二三十年代那种“入乡随俗”、外地经商者必须苦学当地方言的规矩,如今的语言生态已截然不同。当时人口是缓慢渗入各行各业,形成了带不同腔调的海派方言——如苏州上海话、宁波上海话或山东上海话;而如今,城市同质化已演变成全球性趋势,就像广州二十年前除了广东电台大院讲普通话、出门全是粤语,如今也同样普遍讲普通话了。

- 嘉宾对语言传承的现实发出感慨:“现在80后、90后、00后最多是能听懂,不会说,能听不能说,到下一代就没了。” - 老派商业习惯曾有严苛规矩:“以前20年代、30年代,你到全国各地去做生意,你必须学会当地方言,这是规矩,‘入乡随俗’。” - 现代写字楼的语言逻辑:“大家都受过普通话教育,凭什么我到了这儿非得说你当地方言?”

[20:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=1250s) 移民城市的包容与菜市场的鲜活上海话

面对母语的逐渐隐退,身为上海人的嘉宾虽然情感上依恋且失落,但也坦言必须具备包容开放的心态,因为人口流动是不可阻挡的历史大势。如今回到上海,除了儿时玩伴,结交的新朋友几乎清一色来自外地。面对老一辈亲戚想要“把外地人赶出去”的排外言论,嘉宾往往反问:真要赶走外地人,自己在上海就一个朋友都没了。如今许多人即便住在上海市中心,整整一个月接触到的人也全是非本地户籍。

这种语言环境的剧变使得新移民接触方言的机会越来越少。当年大学时期带东北同学回上海,整天耳濡目染,一周就能听个大概;而现在的外来朋友在上海住上好几年,却连一句上海话都听不懂。唯一能够倒流这种趋势的反而是菜市场最基层的打工群体——那些来自山东、安徽的小贩,常年与本地阿姨爷叔打交道,几年下来能讲一口极其地道的上海话。

- 嘉宾面对老亲戚的排外心态时直接反驳:“有些亲戚总说把外地人赶出去,我说你要把他们赶出去,我在上海就没朋友了,我朋友都是外地人。” - 本地生活观察:“我有些朋友说我住在市中心,但我这个月见到的所有人全不是上海人。” - 底层移民的语言融入奇观:菜市场里卖菜的山东和安徽摊贩,由于每天直接接触本地市井老百姓,往往能练就一口比白领更纯正的上海话。

[22:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=1328s) 十六铺码头的历史商机与移民基因

讨论转入外地人融入上海的心理门槛。嘉宾指出,外界常误以为上海人排外,但实际上融入上海在心理上早已变得非常容易。这不仅是因为彻底打破了过去二十年“外面的进不来、里面的出不去”的封闭户籍壁垒,更是因为上海本身的城市底色就是一部外来移民史。上海开埠前只是一座小县城,骨子里缺乏根深蒂固的原生传统束缚,大家都是因江海交通而汇聚于此的移民。

| 历史节点 | 事件与群体行为 | 商业特征与文化体现 | |:--- |:--- |:--- | | **1836年(开埠前)** | 英国商船遭广东驱逐后辗转驶抵上海十六铺码头 | 县城居民非但不畏惧,反而主动围拢招揽租房、促成交易,展现纯熟的商业嗅觉 | | **1843年(正式开埠)** | 沿海沿江商民大批汇流,缺乏绝对的原住民与深厚宗族羁绊 | 形成依赖贸易的实用主义契约文化,极似荷兰等以商立国的开放模式 | | **现代(改革开放后)** | 大规模人口流动与外地高素质人才、劳动力全面进驻 | 彻底冲破封闭户籍限制,商贸与沟通再次催生超越地域的通用交往范式 |

嘉宾引用史料讲到,早在1843年正式开埠前的1836年,曾有两艘英国船只被广州驱逐后碰运气漂到上海十六铺码头。船刚靠岸,城厢里的居民便蜂拥而上,热情询问是否要租房、需要何种货物。英国人惊叹从未见过如此精通商业规矩的当地人。正因为这里的居民同样是早期从外地聚拢来的,没有陈规陋习的包袱,最后不仅将两艘洋船上的货物买卖一空,还顺势卖给英国人大量丝绸和纺织品,让洋人感叹“这个地方有意思”。这种缺乏绝对原住民、依靠贸易维系的开放特性,在机制上与荷兰的重商环境高度相似。

[24:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=1472s) 《海上花列传》与海派交流中的“不响”

谈及海派文学与语言密码,嘉宾提到了韩邦庆用吴语创作、后经张爱玲翻译的经典小说《海上花列传》,以及当代作家金宇澄在《繁花》中大放异彩的词汇——“不响”。在普通话语境中,人们习惯用普通话思维写作和叙事,但如果用上海方言思维展开叙述,“不响”便成了一种极其高深且无处不在的情绪省略。

在上海人的日常人际互动中,“不响”往往包含着巨大的潜台词与留白空间。比如去向领导汇报一桩人尽皆知的事情,回来说“领导不响”,听者立刻就能心领神会:这绝非只是没说话,而是预示着事情可能有各种凶险的变化、甚至可能要出岔子。“不响”二字瞬间将复杂的空气与潜规则传达出来。这种内敛甚至令人捉摸不透的克制,与北方人(如北京胡同里侃大山、凡事都要明明白白抖落出来)的交流风格构成了鲜明反差。

- 关于写作与方言思维的关系,嘉宾阐释道:“你写作的语言就是你思维的语言……如果你用上海话写,你就是用上海人的思维在叙述一件事情,里面一定会出现‘不响’。” - “不响”的丰富潜台词:“领导不响,其实大家都明白了有各种可能。但就因为领导一句话没说,那种气氛马上就传达给大家了。”

[26:31](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=1591s) 恋爱角力场上的沉默与“作壁上观”

为了具象化“不响”的心理特质,嘉宾分享了早年去东北齐齐哈尔、哈尔滨插队时的生动见闻。当年去往北方的上海姑娘样貌出众,引得当地各路小伙子展开极其激烈的追求攻势。而面对北方青年火急火燎、猛打猛冲的恋爱攻势,同行的上海青年却往往站在一旁“不响”。

这种“不响”绝非由于愚钝或怯懦,而是上海青年习惯把所有心思都深藏心底,既不表态也不盲动,宛如作壁上观。在外人眼里,北方男青年两个小时就能把姑娘哄得开开心心、迅速确定关系,而上海男青年却依然杵在边上不吭声,似乎在求偶战场上一败涂地、吃了天大的亏。但嘉宾幽默地澄清,他们并不是不会行动,内心深处甚至可能觉得眼前那套咋咋呼呼的求爱戏码十分滑稽,其内心的冷静自持与隐秘戏谑,正是典型的海派心理图景。

- 恋爱战场上的鲜明对比:“北方青年追求起来非常主动,而上海的小伙子就像看客一样——也不能完全说是看客——反正他们就是不动,你永远不知道他们在想什么。” - 窦文涛追问这是否让上海男生吃大亏,嘉宾笑着回应:“不是,是他就不动,甚至他心里可能还觉得挺可笑的。”

[27:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=1652s) 知青岁月与上海人的“个人主义”处世哲学

嘉宾们从知青插队的旧事切入,剖析了上海人与北方人在群体性格上的鲜明反差。嘉宾回忆起当年上海知青在东北插队时的经历,最吃亏的一点就在于缺乏抱团意识。以哈尔滨知青为例,即便他们内部等级分明,地位最低的人谁都能骂上几句,甚至被自己人随意打骂,但外人绝不能动他一根手指头;一旦上海知青碰了他们的人,对方就会蜂拥而上、成群结队地打群架。相反,上海知青之间如果有人挨打或惹上麻烦,同伴大多选择袖手旁观,既不上前干预,也不多说一句话。

这种看似冷漠的作风,根源在于上海开埠以来形成的契约与个人主义文化。开埠后的商业社会把生存压力直接砸在个人头上,形成了“管好自己、莫管闲事”的边界感,正如真正发达国家中邻里之间互不干涉、形同陌路的状态。嘉宾提到,在大学时期全国各地学生都有老乡会、同乡会,唯独上海人很难搞起这类组织。所谓的“不想管”,本质上是对社会运行效率的权衡——多说一句话可能会让事情变复杂,且结果不可控。面对外界交往时,上海人乃至许多中国人常挂在嘴边的口头禅是“嗯”。在同老外打交道时,对方常困惑地追问这个“嗯”到底代表“Yes”还是“No”,而答复往往就是“就是‘嗯’而已”,仅仅表示“我知道这事了”。正如朋友问“下个月15号聚会你来不来”,你回一句“嗯”,绝不等于承诺一定会去,这种含蓄和留白正如微信聊天里发一个笑脸表情一样,耐人寻味。

> “因为我刚才讲,上海一开埠以后,就把生存的重担直接压在个人身上,除你之外,什么都不管,我管你干什么呢?跟我没关系。”

---

[29:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=1783s) 方言的文学转译:《繁花》如何剔除方言障碍

马未都从编辑与文学创作的角度提出,方言在写小说时优势各异,而上海话在书面化上天然存在极大的局限。在全国主要方言区中,北京话、陕北话、湖南话和四川话非常适宜文学创作,落实到纸面上读者完全能看懂。然而吴语系统不同,很多词汇一旦写成汉字,发音韵味荡然无存;而如果强行使用方言拟音字,读者又会如坠云雾。例如上海人说吃大闸蟹,口语里念作“du za ha”,但白纸黑字写下来不过是“大闸蟹”三个普通汉字,声音一丢,原有的节奏和味道全没了。

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 方言文学转化路径对比 accDescr: 对比北方及西南方言与吴语上海话在文学书面化过程中的差异及《繁花》的折中处理手法。

subgraph EasyTextualization["易书面化方言"] direction TB A["北京 / 陕北 / 湖南 / 四川方言"] --> B["字音对应紧密"] B --> C["读者直接看懂文本"] end

subgraph WuDialectBarrier["吴语方言困境"] direction TB D["吴语 / 粤语口语词"] --> E["生僻字 / 口字旁怪字"] D --> F["文白异读(如'大'念du或da)"] E & F --> G["跨地域阅读障碍"] end

subgraph BlossomsSolution["《繁花》的折中改良"] direction TB H["金宇澄创作策略"] --> I["剔除全部生僻方言字"] H --> J["全书不出现一个'侬'字"] I & J --> K["保留吴语语法句式 + 通行汉字表述"] end ```

金宇澄与嘉宾们深入探讨了上海话文白异读的趣味与难点。过去老上海有一句考验人是不是正宗本地人的顺口溜:“到大路上去吃大菜”。这里的“大路”指南京路,“大菜”指西餐;前一个“大”必须念文读的“du”(du路),而后一个“大”则念白读的“da”(da菜),若分不清便露了怯。广东话同样充斥着各种带“口”字旁的生僻方言字,外地人看招牌如同看天书。作家金宇澄在创作长篇小说《繁花》时,身为资深文学编辑,深知方言生僻字对读者的劝退效应,因此下定决心做减法:整部《繁花》没有用过一个带有生僻偏旁的吴语方言字,甚至连最常见的“侬”(你)字都通篇删削、替换殆尽。他经过反复修改,保留了上海话特有的句式结构和叙事语感,却使用全中文通行的规范词汇,让全国读者读来毫无障碍,而上海本地人又依然能用沪语顺畅朗诵,完成了方言文学的成功改良。

- 适宜写小说的四大方言板块:北京官话、陕北话、湖南话、四川话。 - 沪语异读测试典故:“到大(du)路上去吃大(da)菜”。 - 《繁花》的文字处理准则:全书不出现一个“侬”字,彻底剔除生僻怪字,纯以沪语句式包裹通用汉字。

> “在整本《繁花》里面,没有一个‘侬’字,我全部把它化掉了,所以你是上海人,你用上海话念完全没有问题。”

---

[33:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=1995s) 城市磁场:无障碍的北京与“纽约化”的新上海

嘉宾回忆起自己早年为何离开上海、选择前往北京读大学,其核心考量正是语言与文化生态。过去的北京没有任何方言门槛,只要讲普通话就能游刃有余地融入,这种无障碍的沟通环境吸引了天南海北的奇人异士和文化精英,因此做文化、搞艺术的人天然更倾向于扎根北京。相比之下,当年的上海处处讲沪语,虽然精致稳定,却也带有某种同质化的封闭感。

而今三十余年过去,时代的浪潮彻底重塑了两座城市。年轻一代尤其是“80后”“90后”几乎全由普通话伴随长大,上海话不再是外来者立足的门槛,许多本土年轻人也逐渐失去了对沪语消逝的悲情感。当语言壁垒化解之后,上海迎来了全球各地各色人才的汇聚,不少朋友甚至感叹如今的上海已经高度国际化、多元化,“越来越像纽约”。

> “回过头来看,上海话现在可能也不成为一个障碍了……语言障碍消失之后,我发现各种稀奇古怪的人又都来了,而且我有些在上海的朋友就跟我讲:‘你知道吗?上海现在特别好,像纽约一样。’”

---

[34:41](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=2081s) 欲望的克制:从猛打猛冲到“精算师人格”

窦文涛将话题引向了海派文化深层的人格特质——对“欲望的管理”。北方人(如北京爷们儿)在欲望面前往往崇尚猛打猛冲,行事带着不顾一切的冲劲;哪怕是马未都这样的藏家在碰到心爱之物时,也常常倾其所有、掏空口袋也要志在必得;在男女感情上,北方叙事里也多见为了红颜甘愿抛家舍业的极端激情。然而,在上海人身上,这种失控与狂热极为罕见。

面对心仪的事物或追求的对象,上海年轻人展现出的是一种近乎本能的克制与从容,习惯在场边静观其变,鲜少当众失态,更不会轻易把话说绝、把事做绝。嘉宾分析,这种“不歇斯底里、不倾家荡产”的性格,很大程度上源于上海与香港相似的租界历史与长期商业文明的浸润。在近代契约与法治管理下,市民阶层形成了精打细算、权衡成本收益的“会计师思维”。这种性格虽然在做某些极度理想主义、需要无限放飞自我的事业时显得略受局限,却赋予了上海人极高的理性自持与风度边界。

> “碰见一个女的就说:‘我可以倾家荡产,我就要跟你在一起。’好像上海人不大这样。”

[36:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=2194s) 相亲角、现实考量与婚姻中的“讲条件”

嘉宾们探讨起上海人婚恋观念中的现实主义特征。在上海,婚姻往往是建立在极其务实的“讲条件”之上,最具代表性的便是复兴公园等地的相亲角奇观。父母们在公园里挂出牌子,将子女的各项硬件条件明码标价,涵盖毕业院校、身高、外貌、体重、收入等方方面面。嘉宾对比南北差异时指出,北京虽然也会有相亲活动,但绝不会像上海这样理直气壮、毫无保留地把所有标准摊在台面上,宛如一个纯粹的“交易市场”,把相亲对象当作明码标价的商品来挑拣,彻底剥离了虚浮的罗曼蒂克。

这种务实也反映在婚姻结果上。有嘉宾坦言自己虽有偏见,但身边上海朋友所寻觅的伴侣,从世俗标准来看确实都非常般配合适。面对“上海离婚率是否偏低”的疑问,众人推测民政局的数据未必如此,但上海市民阶层在对待情感与择偶时,确实习惯于将恋爱中的浪漫情调全部抽干,以极其清醒、精明的理性核算来应对人生的结合。

- 复兴公园相亲角现象:父母公开张贴写满子女硬性指标的招牌(学历、身高、长相、体重、收入等)。 - 择偶特征:讲求条件匹配而非单纯欲望冲动,世俗眼光中的“般配度”极高。 - 情感逻辑:市民阶层习惯将感性浪漫转化为理性的条件谈判与利益衡量。

[38:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=2298s) 梅雨般的黏稠、暧昧与王家卫式的情感拉扯

话题转向金宇澄文学作品与上海都市情感中的“不痛快”特征。北方嘉宾直言,从北方人的视角来看,上海文学里描写男女关系总显得有些黏黏糊糊、犹豫不决,整天纠结于“好还是不好”。金宇澄分享了一位北方朋友对他的调侃:“你写的是什么东西?就像上海黄梅天那样闷热黏稠,里面的人到底在干嘛?”北方人习惯直来直去,“行就行,不行就算了”,自认非常“阳光”;但金宇澄反驳道,现实生活往往不是非黑即白的,真要深入了解一个人时,对方往往背负着复杂的现实考量,绝非“要么接受要么拉倒”那么简单。

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: 南北情感表达与上海暧昧美学对比 accDescr: 对比北方直来直去的爽朗模式与上海充满精算与克制的暧昧空间美学。 subgraph North["北方情感模式"] N1["直截了当<br/>'行就行,不行拉倒'"] --> N2["阳光直率<br/>非黑即白"] end subgraph Shanghai["上海情感模式"] S1["现实考量与欲望交织"] --> S2["隐忍克制与低调算计"] S2 --> S3["暧昧空间与留白<br/>'看不清才更有味道'"] end ```

这种“看不清”恰恰是上海独有的城市韵味。办公室里白天形影不离的男女同事,下班后各自的真实生活与去向却无人知晓,这种暧昧构成了城市生活的趣味。嘉宾们指出,这正是王家卫电影所传达的情调——没有琼瑶式的“天崩地裂”或好莱坞式的一往无前,而是一种浸透着精打细算、自我克制与低调的拉扯。欲望与算计交融在市井烟火中,往往“不可说”也不必说,男女之间可能在沉默与低调中早已完成了彼此的掂量。

> 金宇澄指出城市人际关系的幽微之处:“你从这个角度去看这个城市,它就是好的,你看不清才是有意思的。”

[40:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=2452s) 弄堂空间、睡衣文化与独特的公私界限

上海人的精细与处事逻辑并非天生高明,而是在极其拥挤、局促的居住空间中逼仄出来的生存智慧。嘉宾回忆起儿时在上海老房子的生活体验:早期数家合用厨房,后来改造为公用走廊两边住人、往返厨房和卫生间必须穿过公用过道的格局。由于抬头低头全是街坊邻居,通道又狭窄逼仄,人们在家与过道间穿梭根本不可能频繁换衣服,久而久之便养成了穿睡衣拖鞋走动甚至出门的习惯。

这种被外界诟病的“穿睡衣上街”行为,实际上折射出上海人独特的空间界限感。弄堂不仅是公用通道,更是私密家庭空间的天然延伸。在弄堂范围内,街坊四邻知根知底、彼此境况相近,大家便将整条弄堂默认为“家”的一部分;而一旦迈出弄堂去单位上班,脱离了熟人圈子,他们又会迅速换上体面的正装。这种在极其狭窄的公共空间中无限延展私密生活、同时又在极度紧凑的家庭内部各管各账、锱铢必较以求平衡的能力,构成了上海极具张力的公私辩证法。

> 嘉宾精准总结弄堂居民的心理机制:“她们是把整个弄堂当成了自己的家;在弄堂里面,大家头上戴的卡子、身上穿的衣服都差不多,要是真去上班走到弄堂外面,反正单位里也没有同弄堂的人。”

## Notable quotes > [16:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=985s) 在我的理解中,方言的优越性就在于词汇,上海话在词汇上和其他地方是截然不同的。 — 马未都

> [24:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY&t=1472s) 你写作的语言就是你思维的语言

## Mentioned 窦文涛, 周轶君, 马未都, 金宇澄, 许子东, 朱星, 韩邦庆, 张爱玲, 王家卫, 石库门, 巨鹿路675号(上海市作家协会), 十六铺码头, 复兴公园, 《海上花列传》, 《繁花》

## Video description 💡订阅我们,换个视角看懂万象: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwiWVn-hZq3_zuOk570kyGA

简介:《圆桌派》节目以圆桌为名,旨在体现圆桌席上人人平等,每期由窦文涛携手三位嘉宾,还原在生活中发生在圆桌旁、海阔天空的精彩聊天。延续真实不“装”的窦式主持风格,立足网络,放眼世间,神侃包罗万象的话题,嬉笑言谈中彼此迸发出智慧火花。

【圆桌派 窦文涛】人性 · 社会 · 认知:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYxKs_Kmt18U 【鸿观·宋鸿兵】金融 · 权力 · 逻辑:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLcTh2pbxeb-o 【观复嘟嘟 马未都】历史 · 收藏 · 人生:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLOBX8CQ3IYr0 【第一人称复数 周轶君】青年 · 女性 · 世界:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLE0SKDns16wY 【风马牛书房 冯仑】财富 · 经济 · 规律:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBtYaSLkGpag 【百家新说 尹烨】科技 · 生命 · 未来:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIUyn5AuyYUo 【众生 蔡永康】人物 · 命运 · 社会观察:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIOgZ1dPF0JA 【锵锵行天下 窦文涛】世界 · 文明 · 思想:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIJzYJ5gZ-HA

#中国未来 #中国社会 #植物 #生态 #大自然 #经济 #推荐 #热门 #经济 #圆桌派 #纪实 #时间 #历史 #文化 #聊天 #新闻 #心理健康 #中美关系 #科技 #经济 #金融 #香港 #台湾 #hongkong #taiwan #民生 #纪实 #纪录片 #窦文涛 #周轶君 #马未都 #许子东 #尹烨 #圆桌派第七季 #圆桌派 #中国经济 #中国内卷 #中国危机 #地方债 #新能源车 #光伏 #经济危机 #中国房地产 #中美竞争 #科技创新 #制度决定一切 #民营经济 #企业家精神 #AI时代

[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTBrVa_gljY)

中文简报

金宇澄窦文涛论上海文化 称空间逼仄与商业契约催生精算人格 上海人被外界视为冷漠的边界感与精打细算,本质是近代租界避难潮的极端拥挤与工商业秩序共同倒逼出的生存理性,而语言壁垒的消解正加速其向规则主导的移民都市转变。 本期节目聚焦海派文化的内核演变与独特的市民心理机制。窦文涛与马未都、金宇澄、周轶君等嘉宾从半两粮票、石库门“一户一水表”、斜切带鱼等琐碎生活细节切入,深入剖析了上海人在局促空间中磨砺出的精细算计、边界感与克制自律。对话进一步探讨了普通话普及浪潮下沪语的式微、新移民的涌入对城市性格的重塑,以及海派文学与交往中“不响”的留白哲学。全片通过南北观念的生动碰撞,揭示了上海在商业文明与历史租界背景下形成的实用主义契约精神与独特的公私界限辩证法。 上海人精打细算的性格根植于历史生存环境,从半两粮票、按只买菜到石库门公用水池的“一户一表”,无不体现拥挤空间下以明晰产权和规矩维系公共秩序的务实智慧。 (0:00) 在人口流动和普通话普及的冲击下,上海话面临传承断层;金宇澄在创作小说《繁花》时通过剔除生僻怪字、全书不写“侬”字,成功实现了吴语韵味与全国读者阅读体验的平衡。 (18:18) 海派文化深层奉行“精算师”与“不响”的情感逻辑,相较于北方的猛打猛冲,上海人在恋爱、婚姻与人际交往中普遍保持克制与边界感,鲜少歇斯底里或倾家荡产。 (34:41) 上海著名的“穿睡衣上街”现象并非缺乏教养,而是极度逼仄的居住条件下将弄堂视为家庭内部延伸的独特公私界限划分。 (40:52)

Source quotes

[16:25] 马未都: 在我的理解中,方言的优越性就在于词汇,上海话在词汇上和其他地方是截然不同的。 [24:32] 你写作的语言就是你思维的语言

Original transcript

[0:00] Is the term "Shanghainese" derogatory or [0:02] positive? Back then. [0:04] >> Uh, in the North, it might have been a [0:06] ... [0:06] >> Look, when it enters a different [0:08] linguistic system—take today's [0:09] Shanghainese, for instance—if they call [0:11] you an "outsider," [0:12] >> doesn't that carry a sense of looking [0:14] down on someone? [0:15] >> Nowadays, it seems intellectuals in [0:18] Shanghai don't really use the term " [0:21] outsider." That term is mostly used by [0:23] the petty bourgeoisie. [0:25] >> Mm. [0:26] >> Only the urban working class would say [0:29] it like that. Northerners are different [0:30] ; they are coarse and can't stand how [0:32] meticulous the Shanghainese are. How [0:34] meticulous are the Shanghainese in their [0:35] daily affairs? For example, the most [0:36] meticulous thing in Shanghai, and what [0:38] left the deepest impression on me, was [0:39] the "half-tael" food ration coupon. [0:41] Looking back, if you went to Shanghai [0:42] and saw a half-tael coupon, you’d be [0:43] stunned; you wouldn't even know what you [0:44] could buy with it. [0:45] >> Does this "half-tael" actually represent [0:46] the meticulous nature of the [0:47] Shanghainese? Right? Only Shanghai had [0:50] it. [0:50] >> Because the one who mentioned this [0:51] half-tael ration coupon the most was the [0:53] old man's son; he often brought it up. [0:54] >> Mm. [0:55] >> I have also written articles about this [0:57] online. Because I spent many, many years [0:59] in the North. He was an educated youth. [1:02] >> So, the North and the South—no, not the [1:04] South, but the North and Shanghai— [1:06] actually have many differences in their [1:08] daily habits. What does "half-tael" [1:11] actually mean? It means that in Shanghai [1:13] , things were sold in half-tael portions [1:15] . You didn't have that in Beijing during [1:17] the rationing era. [1:17] >> It's just coarse, simply coarse. [1:20] >> For instance, a single wonton would be [1:21] half a tael. Mm. [1:23] >> So in the afternoon, you could just buy [1:25] one wonton or one mooncake—a mooncake [1:27] would weigh half a tael. In the North, [1:29] they sold mooncakes by the catty; they’d [1:32] say, "Give me three catties of mooncakes [1:34] ." [1:34] >> Or take deep-fried dough sticks, [1:36] ordering two catties at a time. But in [1:38] Shanghai, each dough stick was half a [1:40] tael, sold individually. Buying things [1:42] individually started early in Shanghai. [1:44] So, back then, people would joke about a [1:47] Northerner who ordered "one catty of [1:49] wontons," and ended up with twenty bowls [1:52] served in front of him. [1:53] >> Because they were all Northerners who [1:55] didn't understand. [1:56] >> Still, the Shanghainese are meticulous. [1:59] Take my early trips to Shanghai, as I [2:01] went there quite often. Making public [2:03] calls was common, right? [2:04] >> Making a call in Beijing versus making a [2:06] call in Shanghai—there was this very [2:08] interesting phenomenon; there would [2:10] always be an old lady standing right [2:11] next to you. Just as you finished one [2:13] call—say, I finished calling Dou Wentao [2:15] and was moving on to call Zhou Yijing, [2:17] making consecutive calls—before you [2:19] could finish, she’d tap on you and say [2:21] something in Shanghainese, like "Are you [2:23] done yet? Is it over?" [2:25] >> At first, I couldn't understand her. [2:27] >> I just felt like he was constantly [2:29] annoying me. Back then, when making [2:31] calls for money, you had to be efficient [2:33] and finish them all quickly, but it kept [2:35] prompting you on how many you’d made. [2:37] >> In Beijing, no one would prompt you like [2:38] that; if they did, you’d start a fight, [2:40] like, "What are you trying to do?" [2:41] >> I'm just making a phone call, aren't you [2:43] just causing trouble? But in Shanghai, [2:45] you don't feel it's messy; people are [2:47] very practical, one, two, three—they [2:48] just add it up for you right there. [2:50] >> The other day, a classmate of mine in [2:52] Shanghai told me that a taxi driver was [2:54] about to change shifts and didn't want [2:56] to go that way. He told him, "Look, it's [2:58] time for me to go home, I even bought [3:00] crabs specially to eat when I get home. [3:02] " He pulled the bag out, and it was just [3:04] two. [3:06] But seeing a lot online now, I feel that [3:09] in today's era of dieting, I tell you, [3:11] Shanghai people are great, really, their [3:14] whole lifestyle—you don't need to eat [3:17] that many crabs, you know what I mean? [3:20] You don't need to, and besides, when [3:22] Shanghai people buy groceries... [3:24] >> They really just grab such a small [3:26] handful, you don't see that in the North [3:28] . Isn't that actually all you need to [3:30] eat? I think this fits today's lifestyle [3:32] perfectly; it's eco-friendly. [3:34] >> In Shanghai, many things don't keep well [3:36] because it's hot and humid. [3:37] >> So what is it? I've lived in the North; [3:40] in autumn, there were no produce markets [3:41] in the winter, Beijing didn't have them [3:43] either, they just wouldn't. [3:44] >> Right. [3:45] >> So the vegetables were rationed. Homes [3:48] would have hundreds of pounds of Chinese [3:49] cabbage, and work units would distribute [3:51] cabbage and potatoes to get through the [3:52] winter. But in Shanghai, because the [3:55] climate is mild, there are small produce [3:57] markets right next door, sometimes even [4:00] right in the storefronts. They just buy [4:03] a little bit to take home and cook. Back [4:05] when there were no refrigerators at home [4:08] , they would buy things in very small [4:10] amounts to ensure everything was fresh. [4:12] They had the conditions for it. [4:14] >> Go observe—do you think Shanghai people [4:17] really have smaller appetites and eat [4:19] less? [4:19] >> Appetite, appetite. [4:21] >> Maybe the portions are a bit smaller. [4:24] They are definitely smaller, but it's [4:26] that Shanghai serves less food, not that [4:28] people have small appetites. I remember [4:30] going to Shanghai years ago. [4:32] >> There’s a traditional Chinese dish found [4:34] in both the North and the South: ribbon [4:35] fish. Braised ribbon fish. [4:37] >> Because in our younger days, you could [4:39] only get ribbon fish or yellow croaker [4:41] in all of China; nobody knew what other [4:44] types of fish were. When Northerners [4:46] serve ribbon fish, it usually has to be [4:48] cut. Two inches is considered skimpy; [4:50] they usually cut them into three-inch [4:51] segments and serve them up. Whether it's [4:53] braised or deep-fried, in Shanghai, they [4:55] cut it diagonally. [4:56] >> Right, when we were kids, we always [4:58] >> cut it diagonally. The first time I saw [5:01] it cut diagonally, I felt a bit insulted [5:04] . I asked them for a piece, they cut it [5:06] diagonally, and my mind clicked—it's cut [5:09] that way just to look bigger, but there [5:11] isn't actually much there. [5:13] >> They cut it diagonally, which is special [5:16] , because when we eat beltfish, you take [5:18] this big chunk and use your teeth to [5:21] strip off the top dorsal fin—that fin is [5:23] the prickliest part—but if you cut it [5:26] diagonally, the bones don't break as [5:28] much. If you cut it straight, [5:30] >> the fish bones stay intact; if you cut [5:32] it diagonally, the meat ends up full of [5:34] broken bits of bone, and you can't eat [5:36] it without getting frustrated. I think [5:39] your analysis of this whole situation is [5:42] very Shanghainese. [5:43] >> Living in Shanghai, [5:45] >> you're still a Shanghainese person at [5:48] heart, born and raised. [5:49] >> No one else would ponder this stuff. [5:51] >> I've always wondered about it, why they [5:53] cut it diagonally—every culture must [5:55] have a reason; cutting it diagonally [5:57] just makes it look like more. [5:58] >> You see, there are many things like that [6:00] . This is the first time I've heard [6:02] someone explain it so interestingly. [6:03] >> Things we’ve taken for granted are being [6:05] viewed by them from an entirely [6:07] different angle. Take the other day, for [6:08] example, I was talking to someone from [6:10] the 90s who moved from Guangdong to [6:11] Shanghai—there are so many people like [6:13] that in Shanghai now— [6:14] >> and they mentioned a detail that really [6:16] shocked me. I never even thought about [6:18] it; I asked them about riding the subway [6:20] , and they said when you reach your stop [6:21] , people behind you will tap you and ask [6:23] , "Are you getting off? If you're not [6:24] getting off, let's swap spots, or just [6:26] let me pass." They were genuinely [6:28] surprised by this sense of order among [6:29] Shanghainese people. It’s just... [6:32] >> Hidden underneath is something called [6:34] efficiency. [6:34] >> I want to say they plan ahead and [6:36] anticipate high efficiency; they think [6:38] it through very clearly. [6:39] >> I said that when I was a kid we didn't [6:41] have subways, but we took buses and it [6:42] was always like this; everyone would [6:43] naturally, before reaching the stop, [6:44] >> start swapping positions. [6:46] >> Positions would all be switched—exactly [6:48] , isn't that just a natural thing to do [6:50] ? [6:51] >> When Shanghai first started to develop, [6:54] I read in a document that before the [6:56] concessions were established, the old [6:58] city of Shanghai lacked a real concept [7:01] of a modern city. [7:06] On rainy days, it was extremely muddy, [7:09] and wealthy people there could only get [7:11] around by sedan chair or horse-drawn [7:14] carriage. [7:17] But when they stepped outside into the [7:19] concessions—like the Guangdong Road, the [7:22] French Concession roads, or the numbered [7:24] roads—they were stunned. [7:26] These were development zones where [7:29] Western influence had arrived, with such [7:32] smooth, paved streets. They wondered how [7:35] these carriages could have springs and [7:37] move so easily. [7:39] As for the houses, along these newly [7:41] developed roads, they began building [7:44] that Sino-Western style known as [7:46] Shikumen. [7:48] Everything was better than the old city [7:51] , creating a sharp contrast. [7:54] As Mr. Zhu Xing once said, the moment [7:56] you board a train from Nanjing and start [7:59] hearing Shanghainese talk, you hear [8:02] their favorite catchphrase: "Is it worth [8:05] it or not?" [8:05] >> Hearing that sound, he would say, " [8:07] Shanghai is almost here." [8:09] >> That’s exactly what it means. In this [8:12] constant process of comparison, the [8:14] people of Shanghai are particularly [8:16] reserved on the outside, but internally [8:18] , they are always calculating. [8:20] >> Take our Professor Xu Zidong, for [8:22] example; if you spend a few days with [8:24] him, the phrase you hear most often is " [8:26] not worth it, not worth it, not worth it [8:27] ." [8:28] >> Exactly. [8:29] >> That’s how it is. [8:31] >> So, it got me thinking the other day [8:33] that in Chinese architecture, from the [8:36] past to the present, Shanghai is [8:38] probably the only place where such a " [8:41] monster" appeared. [8:43] You see, Beijing has its courtyards, [8:45] which have stayed the same, but Shanghai [8:48] produced the Shikumen. [8:50] >> These Shikumen—you could say they are [8:52] neither purely Chinese nor Western. They [8:54] have Chinese characteristics, yet they [8:57] incorporate many Western decorative [8:59] motifs, and a massive number of them [9:01] were built back in the 1920s and 30s. [9:05] This holds a certain representative [9:07] significance; Shanghai grew into this [9:10] unique urban form, responding to modern [9:12] Western culture by creating this [9:14] architectural hybrid. [9:18] They are very efficient with space— [9:20] Shikumen are great at utilizing space. I [9:23] know this because I recently stayed in a [9:25] hotel that was converted from a Shikumen [9:27] . You walk into a tiny courtyard, then [9:29] it’s stacked up for three floors; the [9:31] spaces underneath are all very small, [9:33] but the space is utilized remarkably [9:35] well. Last time I filmed this show, I [9:38] went to one of those Shikumen houses. [9:40] They’re now home to many families, not [9:42] the wealthy ones, but many families [9:44] living together. I saw it with my own [9:46] eyes—wow, rows and rows of water meters [9:49] , one for every single room. Even where [9:52] there used to be a shared sink, now [9:54] every room has its own meter. It really [9:57] keeps everyone from infringing on each [9:59] other. [10:00] >> Hey, if it were us, I reckon we’d end up [10:03] fighting. [10:03] >> So, that’s just how Shanghai people have [10:06] become. [10:06] >> I think people in Shanghai calculate [10:07] everything very clearly. [10:09] >> Right, their sense of boundaries is [10:10] incredibly strong. [10:11] >> It’s like, I won’t take advantage of you [10:13] , and you don’t take advantage of me. [10:15] Growing up, of all the things my parents [10:17] —my mom—taught me, I don’t remember much [10:20] else, but I remember this one thing she [10:22] kept repeating. If you borrow money, you [10:24] must return it within 24 hours, but when [10:26] lending to others, lend to those in a [10:28] rush, not to the poor. If someone needs [10:30] money urgently, you can lend it to them [10:32] , but if they’re just poor and have no [10:34] money, you’d better not. Often, as you [10:36] just mentioned, for the working class in [10:39] Shanghai, when they talk about " [10:41] outsiders," you have to look at it [10:43] dialectically. [10:45] On one hand, there might be some [10:47] discrimination, but on the other, they [10:49] see them as what we call in Beijing " [10:51] unreliable," because they have their own [10:54] standards. [10:54] >> They just think you’re not careful or [10:57] not following the rules. I’m a very [10:59] rough Northerner, and I remember when I [11:02] was young, I spent a few days with [11:04] someone from Shanghai. [11:06] You know, by the end, I felt like a [11:09] child. It was like I couldn’t even walk [11:12] straight. They really are, as you’d say [11:14] , "sharp and clear-headed." They plan [11:16] everything out well in advance. "Oh, [11:18] that’s not right, that’s not right," [11:20] they’d say, and I’d just stand there, [11:21] clueless. Like, "Oh, why would you buy [11:23] it here?" And you think about it, [11:25] everything they say is right. But how [11:27] can their brains work like that all day [11:29] ? That’s why I felt like a toddler who [11:31] couldn’t walk properly; I just had that [11:33] kind of feeling. It’s the charm of [11:34] culture, because China is a vast country [11:36] , the languages are diverse, and there [11:38] are differences in the culture of every [11:40] region. [11:40] >> When talking about people from a certain [11:43] region, suggesting they have [11:44] commonalities isn't necessarily [11:46] scientific; it’s not a scientific [11:48] concept to begin with. But no one can [11:51] deny that people from the same land [11:53] share a unique vibe. So, you see, even [11:56] if you don't talk about the past, it’s [11:58] all connected. I feel like my friends, [12:01] including Master Ma, are always saying [12:03] how great Shanghai is, and many want to [12:06] visit on weekends. But my own feeling— [12:08] so I’d like to ask Professor Jin and Yi [12:11] Jun—is that Shanghai today gives me the [12:13] impression that... [12:15] >> I really want to connect with this city [12:18] . You know what I mean? But at the same [12:20] time, I feel I have no real connection [12:23] to it. When I look at this city, I [12:25] really like it. The chances of finding a [12:28] good restaurant here are higher than in [12:30] Beijing, you know? The food is delicious [12:33] , there are skyscrapers, a local civic [12:35] life, the French Concession, and walking [12:38] paths. I like it so much that I even [12:40] think about living here, but then... [12:43] >> For some reason, you feel a sense of [12:46] coldness, a sense of being kept out. [12:49] >> Is it just as you said? Every [12:51] Shanghainese person I meet seems to show [12:53] a kind of distant politeness. Or perhaps [12:56] it's the sense of boundaries you [12:58] mentioned. In theory, that's a good [13:00] thing, right? But you always get the [13:01] feeling that if you actually lived here [13:03] , you might feel a bit lonely. That's [13:05] why I wonder about all the outsiders now [13:07] . [13:08] >> Yeah. [13:09] >> When they come to Shanghai, do they have [13:11] this kind of feeling? [13:12] >> They might when they first arrive, but [13:14] after a long time, once you get used to [13:16] it, you won't be so sensitive. [13:20] It’s exactly the issue we just mentioned [13:22] ; most people in Shanghai just mind [13:24] their own business. [13:27] >> It’s just as we said, because of the [13:30] abnormal past, like the Shikumen housing [13:33] we mentioned. [13:34] >> Why were they so crowded? Originally, [13:37] each house was meant for one family, but [13:38] after the August 13th incident, a [13:40] massive number of people fled into the [13:42] concessions. People from all over the [13:44] country ran to the concessions; it was [13:46] an "island of safety." So, the landlords [13:48] and subletters started renting out every [13:51] available space. This kind of crowding [13:53] forced people to try their best to keep [13:56] to themselves. Or, as Zhou Yijun said, [13:59] we don't interfere with each other. But [14:01] the problem is that now, when you go to [14:04] Shanghai, I suspect you won't really run [14:06] into only Shanghainese people. [14:08] >> Everyone speaks Mandarin now; it’s hard [14:11] to tell where anyone is from, unlike [14:13] before. I remember back in the early [14:15] days—I was just chatting with Professor [14:17] Jin—I asked if the Shanghai Writers ' [14:19] Association was still at 675 Julu Road? [14:21] I remember it so clearly, because the [14:23] first time I went to Shanghai, I had to [14:26] go to 675 Julu Road, and that road is [14:28] incredibly long. Something about [14:30] Shanghai that’s really daunting is how [14:32] long the roads are. Once you get on one [14:33] , you’re still a long way from the [14:35] address. You’ll be walking for quite a [14:37] while. In Beijing, no matter how long a [14:39] hutong is, you won’t spend more than ten [14:41] minutes on it, but in Shanghai, you [14:43] could walk until your feet ache and [14:45] still not be there. So, the first time I [14:47] went to Shanghai, the very first issue I [14:50] faced was the language barrier. Back in [14:53] the early 80s, many elderly Shanghainese [14:56] couldn't speak Mandarin at all. They’d [14:58] struggle to speak to you, and you still [15:00] couldn't understand a word. When taxis [15:02] first appeared, the drivers were always [15:04] locals—that was true in Beijing and [15:06] Shanghai alike—it was only later that [15:08] people from outside came to do this [15:10] grueling work. It used to be a lucrative [15:12] job, so the first time I took a taxi in [15:15] Shanghai, I talked to the driver. I [15:17] thought, there's no way he can't [15:19] understand me, right? If I just speak my [15:22] Mandarin a bit more slowly, surely that [15:25] would work? I said, "Turn right," but [15:28] the driver said, "Zuo wan," which I [15:30] misheard as "turn left." I said, "Look, [15:33] you say turn left?" [15:35] >> Doesn't it sound like "turn left" to you [15:37] ? [15:37] >> I said, "Turn right, did you understand [15:39] ?" He just said, "Zuo." I thought he was [15:41] giving me a hard time. I asked, "What [15:43] are you trying to do?" Then he explained [15:45] —Shanghai people are quite interesting; [15:47] they don't say "left turn" or "right [15:48] turn," they say "big turn" and "small [15:50] turn." [15:50] >> Shanghai people also don't really refer [15:52] to heading north or south on the roads, [15:53] have you noticed? [15:54] >> Why is that? [15:55] >> So, the left turn is called...how do you [15:58] say, big turn, small... [15:59] >> Can you pronounce the word "big"? [16:01] >> Left is big. Left is big, right is small [16:04] . [16:04] >> Hmm. [16:05] >> Then he said "xiao"(small), so I... " [16:07] >> Small turn," meaning a smaller movement [16:09] , you turn right. I said "turn right," [16:11] and he was actually repeating "turn [16:12] right" after me. [16:13] >> Oh. [16:14] >> But I heard it as... "Zuo wan"(last [16:16] night/turn left). [16:17] >> I once heard about a Shanghainese person [16:19] who went to Hong Kong and tried to say " [16:21] turn right" in Cantonese, but it came [16:23] out sounding like "there's a ghost." [16:25] >> I want to say, regarding the language [16:27] issue, it actually hits home for me. Now [16:29] , when I return to Shanghai, I can [16:31] barely even speak Shanghainese in the [16:33] city center. [16:34] >> Why? [16:35] >> First, when you start speaking to anyone [16:36] , you aren't sure if they'll understand [16:38] you or what their response will be. You [16:40] don't know. If you go to any shop, I'll [16:43] definitely speak Mandarin first. [16:45] >> You mean Shanghai isn't just [16:47] experiencing a sense of loss, but that [16:49] the objective reality is that we've been [16:51] pushing Mandarin education for over four [16:53] generations. Ever since the Reform and [16:55] Opening-up, Mandarin has become the [16:57] mainstream across the whole country. [16:59] >> And as a result, this city has [17:01] effectively lost its personality. [17:02] >> Lost its personality in what way? For [17:04] instance, if you brought a blind person [17:06] into a city and they only heard Mandarin [17:08] everywhere, they wouldn't even know if [17:10] they had left home. If you arrived in [17:12] Guangdong, you'd expect to hear [17:13] Cantonese and know for sure you were in [17:15] Guangdong. But if everyone in Guangdong [17:17] just spoke Mandarin, the whole country [17:19] would be like the architecture today— [17:21] just lookalike high-rises—and the city's [17:23] unique character would be gone. Its [17:25] character. And now, even young people in [17:27] Shanghai, those born in the 80s and 90s [17:29] , speak Mandarin to each other. Moreover [17:31] , they can't even get the Shanghai [17:33] dialect pronunciations right. [17:34] >> Their language has changed, but do you [17:36] think their... [17:37] >> Personality has changed? [17:39] >> They will lose a lot. [17:40] >> It will change along with the language. [17:42] >> Right, right, it will change according [17:44] to the language. [17:44] >> That's why I've always been calling for [17:46] the protection of our local dialects. [17:48] Shanghainese is a very excellent dialect [17:50] system, because all dialects aren't just [17:52] about intonation and tone. People from [17:55] the North mistakenly think a dialect is [17:57] just an accent; it's not. Take the Hebei [17:59] dialect, for example; most Beijingers [18:01] can understand it. It’s just a different [18:03] accent, but a truly good dialect lies in [18:05] its vocabulary. In my understanding of [18:07] dialects, Shanghainese is completely [18:09] different from others when it comes to [18:11] vocabulary. [18:12] >> Shanghainese people don't use the word [18:14] for "wallet," they call it "pi-jia-zi." [18:16] They don't say "Renminbi" or "money," [18:18] they use the term "chao-piao." They [18:20] always... [18:21] >> It used to be called "dong-di-tong-tong [18:23] ." [18:23] >> That's true too. When I was a kid, we [18:25] didn't even have wallets, we just shoved [18:27] money in our pockets, no "pi-jia-zi." [18:28] >> No, no, it's like this: it's in this [18:30] linguistic choice that its individuality [18:33] exists. Since I work with words, I [18:35] really care about this. I'm always [18:38] calling for the protection of dialects, [18:40] but there's a tragedy—take Shanghainese [18:42] , for example; it’s basically dying out [18:44] because...Because now, those born in the [18:46] 80s, 90s, and 00s can at best understand [18:49] it but can't speak it. They can [18:51] understand but not speak. By the next [18:53] generation, it will be gone. [18:55] >> Because... [18:56] >> It's just that simple. [18:57] >> Because, because back in the 90s, when [19:00] the real estate market started, many [19:02] wealthy people from other provinces came [19:04] to Shanghai to buy property, often [19:06] buying dozens of units at a time. Also, [19:08] a large number of officials from other [19:11] regions were transferred to Shanghai for [19:13] work as the city expanded. [19:16] After these two groups arrived in [19:18] Shanghai, I believe they actually played [19:21] a role in making Shanghai dialect [19:23] unnecessary because they didn't learn it [19:25] . [19:27] >> Because schools now... [19:29] >> Demand Mandarin. If you go anywhere, [19:32] into any executive office building, [19:34] you'll hear Mandarin, because so many [19:37] people from out of town are working [19:39] there. And from their perspective, it’s [19:41] not unfair, because everyone has been [19:44] educated in Mandarin. Why should I have [19:46] to speak your local dialect just because [19:49] I came here? But in the past, back in [19:51] the 20s and 30s, if you went to any city [19:54] in the country to do business, you had [19:56] to learn the local dialect. That was the [19:59] rule. " [20:00] >> When in Rome, do as the Romans do." But [20:02] now, due to the situation I mentioned, [20:05] in the past you wouldn't have so many [20:07] intellectuals or so many business owners [20:09] arriving all at once; they used to [20:11] trickle in slowly across various [20:13] industries, bringing different accents. [20:16] Local Shanghai dialect, [20:17] Shandong-Shanghai dialect, [20:19] Suzhou-Shanghai, Ningbo-Shanghai—they [20:21] all had different accents. Other cities [20:23] were the same. [20:24] >> It's just the way things have gone. I [20:27] think it’s very difficult to appeal for [20:29] this now. It’s not just here; it’s a [20:32] global issue. Cities all over the world [20:34] are becoming more and more alike. I [20:36] spent seven years in Guangzhou 20 years [20:39] ago, and back then, only our Guangdong [20:41] Radio compound spoke Mandarin. [20:43] >> That was the only place, but once you [20:45] stepped out, it was all Cantonese. But [20:47] today, even Guangzhou is the same. [20:49] >> Everyone speaks it. [20:50] >> I, personally, as a Shanghainese, have [20:52] an emotional attachment to the Shanghai [20:54] dialect, so of course, I feel a sense of [20:56] loss, and it’s upsetting. But on the [20:58] other hand, I really think sometimes we [21:00] need to have a more tolerant and [21:02] inclusive mindset, because why? You [21:04] really can't stop the flow of population [21:07] . Now, when I go back to Shanghai, aside [21:09] from the friends I grew up with, most of [21:11] my friends are not from Shanghai. Some [21:13] of my relatives always talk about [21:14] wanting to drive the outsiders out. I [21:16] tell them, if you drive them out, I [21:18] won't have any friends left in Shanghai [21:19] ; my friends are all from out of town, [21:21] right? [21:21] >> Some of my friends say I live in the [21:23] city center, but everyone I’ve met this [21:25] past month isn’t from Shanghai. [21:26] >> Back when I was in college, I brought a [21:28] friend from the Northeast back to [21:30] Shanghai, and he could basically [21:32] understand Shanghainese within a week. [21:34] Because he kept hearing it all the time [21:35] , but now, I know friends who have lived [21:37] there for years and still don't [21:39] understand it, because they never come [21:40] into contact with the dialect. Right, mm [21:43] . [21:44] >> The only exception is the migrant [21:46] workers doing the most basic jobs in the [21:49] vegetable markets. [21:51] Those vegetable sellers from Shandong [21:53] and Anhui—after a few years, they speak [21:56] such authentic Shanghainese. [21:57] >> They deal with local folks every single [22:00] day, but... [22:01] >> Those delivery drivers and the people [22:04] helping families look after their [22:06] children, none of them are locals. [22:08] >> In them, I see how our previous [22:10] generation of Shanghainese entered this [22:12] city; that’s exactly how they came in. [22:14] >> Mhm, we are all immigrants ourselves, [22:16] really. [22:16] >> That’s right, everyone just flowed in [22:18] from the outside. So, as two [22:20] Shanghainese people, can you tell us: is [22:22] it really that difficult for outsiders [22:24] to integrate with the locals in Shanghai [22:26] ? Are Shanghainese people exclusionary? [22:28] There’s no psychological barrier to [22:30] integration; it’s actually become very [22:31] easy, getting easier all the time. It’s [22:33] easier now because we no longer have [22:35] that 20-year period of closed household [22:38] registration, where outsiders couldn't [22:40] enter and those inside couldn't leave. [22:43] After the reforms, masses of people came [22:45] in, which is the original history of [22:48] Shanghai—it started as just a small [22:50] county town. I recently saw a source [22:53] saying that while it opened up in 1843, [22:56] back in 1836, two British ships arrived [22:59] in Guangdong and were driven away. These [23:02] two ships had no other choice, so they [23:04] heard word of mouth and took a chance, [23:06] arriving at the Shiliupu Wharf in [23:08] Shanghai. As soon as they docked at [23:10] Shiliupu, the people from the old walled [23:12] city all swarmed up, looking around, [23:14] asking questions, and trying to strike [23:16] up conversations, asking if they wanted [23:18] to rent a house or what they needed. The [23:20] British said they had never seen people [23:22] in this region behave like that. How did [23:24] they know how to do business? [23:26] >> Because the people in this old city, in [23:28] this place called Shanghai, had [23:30] themselves come from elsewhere back then [23:32] . They didn't have any deep-rooted local [23:34] cultural ties holding them back. They [23:36] had all gathered in this place by the [23:38] sea and river, so when outsiders arrived [23:41] , they could all connect with them. [23:43] >> Listening to this, it sounds a bit like [23:46] the Netherlands. [23:47] >> And so, they say they sold everything [23:49] they had on those two ships. After [23:52] selling, they were immediately [23:53] encouraged to buy silk and all kinds of [23:56] textiles; in the end, it was a huge [23:58] windfall, meaning the money was all [24:01] earned by the Shanghainese. [24:03] >> And so, when they left, they said, " [24:05] This place is interesting, we must [24:07] remember this place." And the kids will [24:09] come back, [24:10] >> So have you noticed that if a place [24:12] doesn't have any true indigenous people [24:14] in the absolute sense, and everyone is [24:16] from all over, you'll find that the [24:18] first commercial trading language to [24:21] emerge is universally understood? Look [24:23] at the Netherlands, for instance; if [24:25] everyone is from elsewhere, the one [24:27] thing we can rely on here is trade. And [24:30] I also think Mr. Jin is quite creative [24:32] with language; he wrote a book back then [24:35] called "The Sing-song Girls of Shanghai [24:37] ." [24:38] >> It was written by Han Bangqing in Suzhou [24:40] dialect, which we couldn't understand, [24:42] but later Eileen Chang felt it was a [24:44] great novelistic tradition, so she [24:46] translated it into something we could [24:48] understand. [24:49] >> And so, Mr. Jin wrote this work, and his [24:51] novel left behind many famous terms; one [24:53] that I find very profound is "bu xiang" [24:55] (not saying a word). How do you say that [24:57] in Shanghainese? [24:58] >> What does it sound like in Shanghainese [25:00] ? " [25:00] >> Bu xiang." [25:01] >> Just silently not saying a word. [25:04] >> To be honest, that is why you might like [25:06] Shanghainese people, but it feels hard [25:08] to connect with them deeply, because [25:11] there's always a subtext you can never [25:13] figure out. [25:14] How would you explain that? [25:16] >> Why is that the case? Well, if you use [25:19] Shanghainese, you see, when you write in [25:21] your mind, you usually think in Mandarin [25:23] ; your writing language is your thinking [25:25] language. So, generally, when you sit [25:27] down to write, you are thinking in [25:29] Mandarin. But if you write using [25:31] Shanghainese, you are narrating an event [25:33] with Shanghainese thinking. The term " [25:35] bu xiang" will definitely appear in it. [25:37] Because, for example, if Zhang San goes [25:40] to see a leader, when we Shanghainese [25:42] narrate an event, the term "bu xiang" [25:44] implies a kind of ellipsis. For example [25:46] , everyone already knows about a certain [25:48] matter, and then I go to see the leader [25:49] , and the leader says nothing; he just [25:51] says "the leader is' bu xiang '." The [25:52] leader saying nothing actually makes [25:54] everyone understand that there are [25:55] various possibilities. But since the [25:57] leader didn't say a single word, that [25:59] atmosphere is immediately conveyed to [26:01] everyone. Wow, it turns out there's no [26:03] result, and perhaps something might even [26:05] go wrong, or whatever. So those two [26:07] words, "bu xiang," are something [26:08] Shanghainese people probably say [26:10] countless times every single day. This [26:12] is very interesting; people like the [26:14] Beijing "chatters" must be very familiar [26:16] with this. Sometimes, you don't even [26:18] need a subtext; sometimes it's even [26:19] forcing the other person, "You want me [26:21] to talk, I'll talk, right?""It all has [26:23] to be said. You see, with Shanghai [26:26] people, often you can't tell what [26:28] they're thinking, but they'll just... [26:30] they won't say anything. [26:31] >> Let me give you a simple example. [26:34] I was just telling Professor Ma, when I [26:37] was young and went to the Northeast, [26:39] those Shanghai girls who arrived in the [26:42] North—Beijing, Qiqihar, Harbin—everyone [26:45] saw how pretty the Shanghai girls were. [26:48] Big competition to date them. And at [26:51] that moment, you could describe how, for [26:53] instance, the Shanghai boys just stood [26:55] on the sidelines, saying nothing. [26:57] >> Just nothing. It’s not that they were [27:00] stupid or mute; they just stood there, [27:02] keeping it all inside, not knowing how [27:04] to act, saying nothing. [27:05] >> Because the young men from the North [27:07] were very proactive in their pursuit. [27:09] Exactly. [27:10] >> But the young men from Shanghai were [27:12] like onlookers—well, not exactly [27:14] onlookers—they just wouldn't act, and [27:15] you never knew what they were thinking. [27:17] >> Others would win a girl over in two [27:19] hours, while you'd just stand there. [27:21] >> Doesn't that put you at a disadvantage? [27:23] >> A huge disadvantage. [27:24] >> On the dating battlefield, aren't you [27:26] essentially...nothing? [27:26] >> No, it's not that. It's that they won't [27:29] act, and maybe they're even finding it [27:30] amusing. [27:31] >> Right. [27:32] >> Yes, exactly. [27:33] >> So, back when we, the Shanghai educated [27:35] youth, were in the Northeast, what was [27:37] the biggest source of loss for me? Take [27:39] the Harbin youths, for example; even the [27:41] lowest-ranking person in their group [27:43] could be scolded by anyone among them. [27:46] >> Mm. [27:47] >> They could beat or scold them at will. [27:50] But, you Shanghai people couldn't touch [27:52] them. If any of you Shanghai people [27:54] touched them, a whole group would swarm [27:57] you. [27:57] >> But for us Shanghai people, even if one [28:00] of us was in trouble...There was no [28:02] sense of collective solidarity; if you [28:04] were being beaten, we wouldn't intervene [28:06] . [28:07] >> We just wouldn't say anything. Because, [28:09] as I said, once Shanghai opened up, it [28:12] placed the burden of survival directly [28:14] onto the individual. Beyond yourself, [28:17] nothing else matters—why should I care [28:20] what you do? It's none of my business, [28:22] it has nothing to do with me. [28:23] >> It's like in truly developed countries, [28:25] where neighbors are like strangers, each [28:27] minding their own business. [28:28] >> There is no... [28:30] >> No sense of collective behavior. Because [28:32] the Harbin youths were incredibly [28:34] tight-knit; if you bullied one of them, [28:35] a whole gang would come up to fight you [28:37] . When I was in college, there were all [28:39] sorts of regional associations, but [28:40] Shanghai people could never seem to [28:42] start one. It’s simply that they have an [28:44] individualistic concept. You say" not [28:46] wanting to, "but it’s actually a matter [28:49] of efficiency. If I say something, a [28:51] situation might become more complicated [28:53] , or I’m not sure what the result will [28:55] be, so I just don't want to. Not wanting [28:57] to is basically a diplomatic way of [28:59] saying" no, "or rather, avoiding the [29:00] issue. [29:00] >> But I think, I think after you finish [29:02] speaking... [29:03] >> There’s another word I use when dealing [29:04] with foreigners; they always say—I don't [29:06] know if it's just Shanghainese or all [29:08] Chinese—I always say" Mm. " [29:09] >> They ask when I say" Mm, "" Does your' [29:11] Mm 'mean' yes 'or' no '? " [29:13] >> I say I just mean" Mm. " [29:15] >> It just means I’m aware of the matter. I [29:17] think there should be a cultural [29:19] understanding between us; that's just [29:22] Chinese culture. [29:24] For instance, if Wentao says," Are you [29:26] coming to our get-together on the 15th [29:29] of next month? "and you go" Mm, "it [29:32] doesn't mean you're going. [29:34] >> Exactly. [29:35] >> Its meaning is very complex; that’s the [29:37] essence of Chinese culture. [29:38] >> It’s like sending a smiley face on [29:40] WeChat; you never know what it really [29:41] means. Anyway, since we have to talk [29:43] about novels and dialects... [29:45] Shanghainese doesn't have an advantage [29:47] as a dialect; you can't write novels in [29:49] Shanghainese. [29:50] >> You really can't; it's certainly [29:52] impossible. I am a professional editor, [29:54] and I’ve actually discussed which [29:56] dialects are advantageous for writing [29:58] novels. There are four major dialect [29:59] regions in China that are great for [30:01] novels: first, the Beijing dialect [30:03] region, followed by northern Shaanxi, [30:05] Hunan, and Sichuan. When those dialects [30:07] are written on paper, you can understand [30:08] them. [30:09] >> They can be textualized. But [30:11] Shanghainese—take the simplest example. [30:14] When I go to Shanghai and they talk [30:16] about eating" big crabs, "they say" du [30:18] za ha. " [30:18] >> I say," Write those three characters [30:20] down for me, "and once written, it's [30:22] just" big crab. " [30:22] >> Right. [30:23] >> It’s written as" big crab, "but they say [30:26] " du za ha, "you see... [30:28] >> Same characters, different [30:30] pronunciations? [30:31] >> That doesn't work. The sound is lost in [30:33] the written text, and all the rhythm and [30:36] nuance are gone. What Mr. Ma is saying— [30:38] I understand—is that, much like [30:40] Cantonese, Shanghainese contains many [30:42] terms that aren't common in writing. You [30:44] could show the written word to a [30:45] Shanghainese person, and they wouldn't [30:47] even know what you mean. That’s one [30:49] point. [30:49] >> Regarding the" du za ha "thing mentioned [30:51] earlier, the character" da "(big)... [30:53] >> In Shanghainese, sometimes it’s [30:55] pronounced" da, "and sometimes it’s [30:56] something else. [30:57] >> For example, there used to be a phrase [30:59] to test if someone could speak the [31:01] dialect or if they were truly from [31:03] Shanghai:" Go to the big road to eat big [31:06] food. "Mm. [31:07] >> That is, the big road—which is Nanjing [31:10] Road—and eating" big food, "which refers [31:13] to Western cuisine. [31:15] >> It depends on how you pronounce that" [31:18] big "character. [31:20] >> The phrase is meant to be said as" Go to [31:22] the' du 'road to eat' da 'food, "making [31:25] sure to use the" da "sound. [31:27] >> You can't say" du. "" [31:29] >> Du "and" da "—because in some Northern [31:31] dialects, a single character might have [31:34] two pronunciations in Shanghainese. See [31:36] ," du "road," da "food—you see, this" da [31:38] food "must be emphasized. So, for [31:40] Shanghai dialect—you know, maybe last [31:42] year or the year before, there was [31:44] something really interesting on a public [31:46] account, someone wrote a funny story in [31:48] Shanghainese, and everyone in our office [31:50] was passing it around, but no one could [31:52] understand it. Then I asked them," What [31:54] are you reading? "They said," Oh, it's [31:57] so funny. "They said you could roughly [31:59] guess what the story was about, but a [32:01] large portion of the vocabulary and [32:03] language was incomprehensible, yet they [32:05] could still feel the, the, the vibe of [32:06] the Shanghai dialect. [32:07] >> Shanghainese and Cantonese; the biggest [32:09] feature of Cantonese is that when you [32:11] look at a sign, every character has a [32:13] mouth radical, but you have no idea what [32:15] the character is. [32:16] >> So, for the book" Blossoms, "as long as [32:19] there was an obscure character, I didn't [32:21] use it. [32:21] >> Right. [32:22] >> The whole book of" Blossoms, " [32:24] >> in the entire book of" Blossoms, "there [32:26] isn't a single" nong "(you) character. [32:28] >> Mm. [32:29] >> I converted them all, so if you are from [32:31] Shanghai, you can read it in [32:32] Shanghainese perfectly fine. [32:33] >> Mm. But actually, because of it—for [32:36] example, the character" nong "—it has [32:37] become a direct substitute. [32:39] >> Mm. [32:40] >> I was thinking that" nong "is a common [32:42] character; if you have a lot of" nong " [32:44] on every page, many readers definitely [32:46] wouldn't like it. [32:47] >> So I removed this local element, and [32:50] because I work as a literary editor, [32:52] >> literary editors are always looking at [32:54] things like," I don't understand how you [32:56] wrote this dialect, so I have to help [32:58] you change it, or have the author change [33:00] it. "So for this book, I revised it many [33:02] times to remove all those words that [33:04] represent Shanghai specifically. But the [33:06] sentence structure is still that of the [33:08] Shanghai dialect. [33:09] >> Mm. Right, it allows us to appreciate [33:12] the beauty of the Shanghai language; [33:13] this is a contribution to language [33:14] itself. [33:15] >> It’s like, it’s like a modified version [33:17] , not standard—why did I leave Shanghai [33:20] back then and head to Beijing for [33:22] university? Actually, there’s this [33:24] language issue—how did that play into it [33:26] ? The reason I thought Beijing was more [33:28] interesting than Shanghai back then was [33:30] because Beijing had no language barrier [33:32] . Anyone from out of town who speaks [33:34] Mandarin can get by in Beijing, which is [33:37] why it attracts so many eccentrics—all [33:39] kinds of different people. To this day, [33:41] if you’re in culture or something [33:43] similar, you’d still choose Beijing. If [33:45] you’re in other industries, you might [33:47] choose to go to Shanghai. Back then, [33:49] because people in Shanghai spoke [33:51] Shanghainese, there was this sense of [33:53] homogeneity; you felt you knew the city [33:56] well, and it was good, but for me, I [33:58] felt the North had more variety, more [34:01] changes, and was more colorful. [34:03] >> Now, looking back, the Shanghai language [34:05] might no longer be an obstacle. On one [34:07] hand, there’s a bit of a loss, but on [34:09] the other, when the language barrier [34:11] disappears, I’ve found all sorts of [34:13] interesting people arriving, and some [34:14] friends in Shanghai tell me," Do you [34:16] know? "" Shanghai is so great now, " [34:18] they say," It’s like New York. " [34:19] >> There really are people who say that. [34:21] >> Right, those born in the 80s or 90s have [34:24] no sense of loss at all, nor do they [34:26] feel that the Shanghai dialect is a [34:28] crucial part of their identity, because [34:31] they were all raised on Mandarin. [34:33] Perhaps the biggest aspect is, looking [34:35] back at history, the Shanghai of the [34:37] concession era was also considered a [34:40] cultural center. What I’m more [34:41] interested in is the character and the [34:44] human heart—for instance, when you talk [34:46] about young people pursuing girls back [34:48] then, what you said about the attitude [34:50] of Shanghai youth. [34:51] >> Because I thought of something, which is [34:54] the management of desire, the management [34:56] of… [34:56] >> Like, for example, how you handle your [34:58] own desires. [34:59] >> Like, take Beijing guys—they just go for [35:02] it, right? They dive right in, or [35:04] whatever, everyone’s like that. Ah, not [35:06] exactly, but for instance, like you just [35:08] said about the Shanghai youth waiting on [35:11] the sidelines, [35:12] >> Even so, they are still flesh and blood [35:14] , living and breathing. Is it that [35:16] Shanghai people are better at... [35:18] >> Restraint? [35:19] >> No, it’s not just about managing desire [35:22] ; for example, people like me often find [35:25] that we might lose control, you know? We [35:28] just have to satisfy our impulses when [35:30] we can't hold back, but looking at the [35:31] Shanghainese I've encountered, at least [35:33] those I've met, I rarely see them, how [35:35] should I put it, lose their composure. [35:37] Or insist that they must have something [35:39] . Take us, for example, Ma Ye. Sometimes [35:42] when we really like something, we'd turn [35:44] out all our pockets to get it. We just [35:46] have to have it, but you see... [35:48] >> You're right. So, why do people have [35:50] these desires? What I'm interested in is [35:52] , don't you have anything you [35:53] specifically crave? [35:54] >> Or perhaps, falling in love with a girl [35:57] and saying," I can give up my entire [35:58] family fortune just to be with you. " [36:00] But that doesn't seem to be the [36:02] Shanghainese way. [36:04] >> Yes, if you're talking about a specific [36:06] trait, a portion of Shanghainese people [36:09] are indeed like that. [36:11] I don't know why either; maybe it's [36:14] because of the history, like Hong Kong, [36:16] of being under a lease-based [36:18] administration. [36:19] >> Right. [36:20] >> They handle things in a calculated, [36:22] methodical way, which is why people say [36:24] Shanghainese make the best accountants. [36:26] That's exactly it. If you want to do [36:29] something idealistic, you have to be [36:31] able to broaden your horizons. In this [36:34] place, because it has always been [36:36] managed by strict rules... [36:39] ... [36:39] >> there will be things that spark a [36:41] powerful sense of drive within you. [36:44] That’s why Shanghainese marriages are [36:46] based on" negotiating terms. "It’s why [36:49] you only see that spectacle in Shanghai [36:50] , like at Fuxing Park where they hold [36:52] matchmaking sessions. It’s all very [36:54] practical, right? It’s about negotiating [36:57] terms, not just raw desire. We negotiate [36:59] conditions. [37:00] >> So, I have another prejudice—it’s [37:02] definitely a prejudice because our [37:03] social circles are quite limited—which [37:05] is... [37:05] >> My Shanghainese friends... [37:07] >> Hmm. [37:08] >> I have to admit that the partners they [37:10] find, whether it's a husband or a wife [37:12] ... [37:12] >> Hmm. ... [37:14] >> are all quite suitable, from a worldly [37:16] perspective, at least. [37:17] >> Well, you could actually check with the [37:18] Ministry of Civil Affairs to see if [37:20] Shanghai's divorce rate is lower than [37:21] others. [37:22] >> It wouldn't be. [37:23] >> It wouldn't be. [37:24] >> Really? Look at what he said about the [37:27] parents. In that park, this would be [37:30] impossible in Beijing. Parents hold up [37:32] placards with all sorts of standards— [37:35] university, height, appearance, weight, [37:38] income—it's all on there. [37:39] >> Beijing wouldn't do that. I don't think [37:42] that happens in Beijing. I... [37:45] >> It might happen, but not as boldly and [37:46] unapologetically as in Shanghai. So... [37:49] >> It's completely turned into a [37:50] marketplace. [37:51] >> Exactly, exactly. [37:52] >> It's just, well, a commodity. [37:54] >> Treating people like a commodity... [37:55] >> Let's just stop talking about that kind [37:57] of romance. [37:58] >> Exactly, I think this is a [37:59] characteristic of Shanghainese people. [38:06] Often, within certain urban classes, [38:08] people treat things in a way that [38:10] completely drains away all the charm and [38:13] romance of falling in love. [38:18] >> Even the relationships you write about [38:20] in your novels give me the impression— [38:22] to put it bluntly, from our Northern [38:24] perspective—that things are just [38:26] indecisive. It’s always" Oh, is this [38:28] good, or is it not? " [38:30] >> Just think about it, that lack of [38:31] directness...I have a friend from the [38:33] North who once asked," What are you [38:34] writing about? "" You're like that muggy [38:36] plum rain season in Shanghai; what are [38:38] all these people in there even doing? " [38:41] They scolded me at length. After [38:43] scolding me, they said they wanted to [38:45] move to Shanghai to live. They meant [38:47] that relationships in the North are very [38:50] straightforward: if it works, it works; [38:52] if it doesn't, we’re done. Right? We are [38:55] very sunny people, whereas you... [38:58] >> Perhaps it’s the climate or something [39:00] else, but how did it end up like this? [39:03] But what is the reality? You can be as" [39:06] sunny "as you want in the North, but [39:08] when you truly get to a certain point [39:10] and try to understand someone—say you [39:12] like a girl—if you don't happen to meet [39:15] someone who’s" take it or leave it, " [39:17] but instead someone who has other [39:19] complicated reasons for not being with [39:21] you right away...Even the two of you, in [39:23] the end, won't be able to see clearly [39:26] what’s actually going on. [39:28] Or, you see your colleagues in the [39:31] office, a man and a woman so close [39:33] during the day, but you have no idea [39:35] what they’re doing after work. If you [39:38] look at the city from this perspective, [39:40] that’s exactly what makes it good—the [39:41] fact that you can’t see things clearly [39:43] is what makes it interesting. [39:44] >> Ambiguity. [39:45] >> Exactly. [39:47] >> That’s why I feel that Wong Kar-wai’s [39:48] films capture exactly what we’re talking [39:50] about—that lack of directness, that [39:52] distinctively lingering, indecisive [39:53] flavor. Right. [39:54] >> Between a man and a woman, there are so [39:56] many calculations, so many different [39:58] ideas. I feel like, simply put, romance [40:01] is like a Chiung Yao novel—" Oh! Ah! Oh [40:04] ! "And then what? Or something like" [40:07] Wild at Heart. "But you see, I actually [40:10] think there’s a sense of restraint [40:12] within Shanghai’s culture. A kind of [40:15] self-control. Of course, there is desire [40:18] , but this desire is mixed with their [40:21] pragmatism and calculations. Often, it's [40:24] something they don't want to say, or [40:26] can't say. You see, I can't quite get a [40:29] handle on it, you know? It’s completely [40:32] low-key, the way the man and the woman [40:34] act. [40:34] >> Perhaps the mutual assessment is already [40:37] over. [40:37] >> So, it's not that Shanghainese people [40:39] are naturally smarter than those from [40:41] other places. Hmm. [40:43] >> Their living environment [40:45] >> Yes. [40:46] >> has gradually cultivated this [40:47] meticulousness, [40:48] >> and finding ways out of impossible [40:50] situations. [40:51] >> This kind of trait. [40:52] >> The city, right? I—I just heard Teacher [40:54] Jin speak, and it brought back so much. [40:56] Because the house we lived in when I was [40:58] a child was one of those old-style ones [40:59] ; at the very beginning, we shared a [41:00] kitchen, but later it was renovated— [41:02] I've seen you write about these houses [41:03] in your books—it became a layout where [41:05] families lived opposite each other, but [41:06] with a corridor in between, you know? [41:08] Like, if I wanted to go to our kitchen [41:10] or use the restroom, I had to walk [41:11] through that corridor—exactly, exactly. [41:13] >> You see each other, you see everyone. [41:16] >> I was young then, and sometimes the [41:18] neighbors would be there, and you have [41:20] to consider that the path was so narrow [41:22] . Would you bother changing clothes? [41:24] You’d definitely just put on pajamas and [41:26] head out, which is why Shanghainese [41:27] people can walk outside in their pajamas [41:28] . Sometimes I think it’s just something [41:30] that was forged that way. [41:31] >> Shanghainese women wearing pajamas in [41:33] public—sorry, I interrupted you, excuse [41:35] me. [41:36] >> It means that [41:37] >> they treat the entire alleyway as their [41:40] own home; within the bounds of the alley [41:42] , they know everyone is more or less the [41:45] same, in terms of hairpins or what [41:47] they're wearing. If they ever really had [41:49] to go to work, they would step outside [41:51] the alley, where, anyway, there wouldn't [41:53] be anyone from their own lane at their [41:55] workplace. [41:56] >> Oh, that is such an interesting concept [41:59] of space. You mean, they essentially [42:01] treat the public space of the alley as [42:04] their private space because they live so [42:06] closely, yet even within such a private [42:09] space, a husband and wife can still [42:11] manage their own affairs independently. [42:13] Yes. [42:14] >> Settling accounts, whether gaining or [42:16] losing, is all handled clearly to [42:18] maintain a balance. [42:19] >> You see, the distinction between private [42:21] and public here is hard to define; in [42:23] the end, it just becomes," Well, that's [42:25] great, thank you, keep looking and keep [42:27] observing, and you'll understand our [42:28] Shanghainese friends. "Yeah.