窦文涛梁文道剖析独居潮:公共服务外包令家庭告别实用共居

人到中年夫妻俩分房睡,感情反而越来越好?看懂的绝对都是聪明人!#感情 #夫妻 #夫妻日常 #智慧 — 纪实万象

纪实万象

现代社会将医疗与照料功能全面外包降低了独居门槛,使伴侣共同生活从满足生存互助的实用刚需,升华为剥离功利目的的纯粹精神连接。

AI-assisted summary of 人到中年夫妻俩分房睡,感情反而越来越好?看懂的绝对都是聪明人!#感情 #夫妻 #夫妻日常 #智慧 — original source. Check the original for full context.

Source published:

Key ideas

  • 家庭结构历史演进正走向极致原子化,挪威与瑞典等北欧国家的独居户比例已超过50%,催生了兼顾私密卧室与庞大公共社交空间的新型青年共居(Co-living)模式。 (0:01)
  • 家庭传统职能的全面社会化外包是独居潮的核心支撑,生老病死等事务逐步由医院、养老院与智能急救设备承担,使共同生活不再是生理生存的绝对必需。 (46:40)
  • 亲密关系正从以分工照料为目的的实用性结合,转向“一起独处”(Being alone together)与剥离功利目的的纯粹“生命共同体”。 (43:54)
  • 当代青年更倾向设立严格的物理与心理边界,“住隔壁的伴侣”成为理想形态,因独处习惯的固化使得关系中的妥协极易被感知为个人委屈。 (3:10)

Detailed notes

## Background 本期内容由YouTube频道“纪实万象”于2026年11月2日发布。节目选自窦文涛主持的谈话类节目《圆桌派》,由窦文涛携手嘉宾圍繞中年夫妻分房睡、獨居浪潮以及現代親密關係的轉變等話題展開海闊天空的探討。

## TL;DR 節目從現代家庭規模縮小與「分房睡」、青年公寓「共居」等居住現象切入,深入剖析了都市化與個體「原子化」生活方式對親密關係的重塑。嘉賓們對照了國際孤獨等級表、自身獨處及合租經驗,探討了創作與自由對獨立空間的剛性需求,以及獨自生病等現實脆弱性。最後指出,隨著現代社會將生老病死等傳統家庭功能高度外包,夫妻或伴侶選擇生活在同一空間,已從過去互為照料的實用互助,升華為超越功利的「生命共同體」與「純粹關係」。

## Atmosphere & style 整場對話延續了《圓桌派》標誌性的圍爐漫談風格,氛圍鬆弛而知性,既有哲思深度,又充滿市井煙火氣。席間竇文濤與梁文道、周軼君等嘉賓笑談不斷、互相調侃,從香港廟街的大排檔、煲仔飯聊到愛因斯坦與帕慕克的創作心境,在幽默隨性的談笑中碰撞出敏銳的情感洞察與溫情共鳴。

## Bulletin - [00:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=1s) 家庭结构历史演进正走向极致原子化,挪威与瑞典等北欧国家的独居户比例已超过50%,催生了兼顾私密卧室与庞大公共社交空间的新型青年共居(Co-living)模式。 - [46:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=2800s) 家庭传统职能的全面社会化外包是独居潮的核心支撑,生老病死等事务逐步由医院、养老院与智能急救设备承担,使共同生活不再是生理生存的绝对必需。 - [43:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=2634s) 亲密关系正从以分工照料为目的的实用性结合,转向“一起独处”(Being alone together)与剥离功利目的的纯粹“生命共同体”。 - [03:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=190s) 当代青年更倾向设立严格的物理与心理边界,“住隔壁的伴侣”成为理想形态,因独处习惯的固化使得关系中的妥协极易被感知为个人委屈。

## Key takeaways - [00:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=1s) 人类居住单元从原始部族、四代同堂一路缩减至两口之家与独居,北欧独居率已超半数,推动了“私密卧室+共享客厅/厨房”的青年共居形态兴起。 - [03:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=190s) 高度发达的城市商业体系(如便利店与单人快餐)为“原子化生存”提供了完善配套,使个体无须依赖他人即可长期生活。 - [05:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=304s) 独居虽享有极致自由,但长期共同生活能构建一种基于脆弱性与相依为命的心理共同体,这是消费主义便利无法取代的情感重力。 - [07:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=443s) “国际孤独等级表”反映出从单人日常消费到独自手术、搬家等高抗阻事件的心理与物流门槛,身处热闹人群中的形单影只往往最令人难熬。 - [13:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=790s) 享受独处者往往拥有“非人类伴侣”(如画本或相机),而现代年轻人的独自出行更多借助网络打卡与直播将个人状态舞台化,消解了传统文青式的感伤。 - [21:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=1267s) 过度安逸与家庭幸福可能反向抑制思想家与艺术家的创作灵感,独处与心理边界的构建往往是深度思考与精神劳作的刚性前提。 - [24:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=1455s) 真正的孤独是清醒体认到自我作为“绝对独立个体”的存在,而非单纯的无聊或缺乏知己。 - [28:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=1712s) 长期独处会固化微观生活习惯,以至于伴侣的短期探访甚至会被视作对个人秩序的打扰与负担。 - [31:35](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=1895s) 现代年轻人视同居琐事的牺牲为委屈,倾向追求“相邻而居、互不侵犯”的亲密关系,不再维系旧时代的家务照顾逻辑。 - [35:33](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=2133s) 中国年轻人的独居多由大规模城乡人口流动和一线城市合租现实催生,是漂泊现实下的被动适应而非纯粹的浪漫哲学选择。 - [38:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=2305s) 居住空间面积决定生活底线:三十平方米能唤起对精致生活的美学追求,而七八平方米则退化为仅供生存的逼仄盒子。 - [41:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=2482s) 独居的最大隐患在于深夜突发疾病时的无助与失联风险,凸显了独居时代配备智能预警等安全兜底机制的必要性。 - [43:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=2634s) 哲学家艾丽斯·默多克与其丈夫践行的“一起独处”(Being alone together)展示了理想婚姻模型:在彼此依存的承诺中保留全然独立的精神空间。 - [46:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=2800s) 现代社会将生产、生育、医疗及养老职能彻底外部化,使得当人们选择与伴侣同居时,关系升华为摆脱实用需求的纯粹生命陪伴。

## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=1s) The Shift Toward Solitary Living and the Rise of Co-Living

The discussion begins with findings from surveys showing that even among married couples, there is a widespread longing for separate personal bedrooms whenever physical housing conditions allow. As Dou Wentao and the panel muse on human societal development, they trace the dramatic shrinking of the household unit across history: humanity shifted from primitive communal living and vast kinship clans down to four generations under one roof, then three, then two, and finally to modern two-person nuclear or DINK (double income, no kids) households. In Western countries like the United States, single-person living has already reached a significant proportion, while in Northern European nations such as Norway and Sweden, solo households now account for more than half the population. Dou Wentao asks Liang Wendao what this trend toward married couples seeking separate spaces and individuals living alone reveals about human evolution.

Liang Wendao suggests that the modern phenomenon of living alone is not strictly solitary in the traditional sense, pointing to the surging popularity of "co-living." Unlike traditional apartment blocks where an individual simply unlocks a front door to an isolated flat, contemporary youth apartments provide private bedrooms alongside sprawling communal infrastructure. Residents share massive living rooms, communal kitchens, dining areas, newspaper reading lounges, gyms, and even ping-pong tables. Liang Wendao explains that while residents maintain total autonomy over their private sleeping quarters, they regularly gather downstairs to cook, chat, and socialize. In youth apartments seen in cities like Guangzhou, this architecture functions like an elevated university dormitory: tenants form tight-knit communities, and many who eventually move out still return regularly to hang out.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Evolution of Living Structures accDescr: Diagram tracing human domestic arrangements from early communal clans to modern co-living and single-person households.

subgraph Historical["Historical Living Arrangements"] A["Communal & Clan Living"] --> B["Multi-Generational Households<br/>(3 to 4 Generations)"] B --> C["Nuclear & DINK Families<br/>(2-Person Households)"] end

subgraph Modern["Modern Living Models"] C --> D["Single-Person Households<br/>(>50% in Norway & Sweden)"] C --> E["Co-Living Youth Apartments"] E --> F["Private Bedrooms + Shared Social Hubs<br/>(Kitchen, Gym, Lounge)"] end ```

- When evaluating the modern shift in domestic setups, Liang Wendao highlights how youth spaces blur traditional boundaries: “So, would you call these people 'living alone'? They seem to be living alone, but it's not the strict, traditional sense of living alone.” - In Northern European countries like Sweden and Norway, single-person households now represent more than 50% of all households. - Co-living developments, such as modern youth apartments in Guangzhou, combine fully privatized bedrooms with shared social facilities on the ground floor to eliminate social isolation.

[03:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=190s) Urban Atomization: From Single-Diner Meals to the "Boyfriend Next Door"

The conversation turns to the emotional and physical boundaries young people now establish in intimate relationships. Liang Wendao shares an anecdote about a female friend born in the 1990s whose ideal relationship status is simply having a "boyfriend who lives next door"—close enough to visit without lengthy travel, yet maintaining completely independent living spaces so neither person encroaches on the other's territory. Dou Wentao observes that this reflects a broader generational pattern: people increasingly prefer to function either as an isolated island or as a plug-and-play node, holding extremely high demands for personal space. Even when modern couples sit together at cafes for afternoon tea, both are often buried entirely in their own smartphones rather than interacting with each other.

Dou Wentao recalls his own culture shock when moving to Hong Kong roughly a decade earlier, where he first encountered extreme urban accommodations designed specifically for the solitary individual. The very first phrase in Cantonese he learned was *"ceng2 dou3 gwai3 toi4 ceoi2"* (“please go to the counter to collect”), heard repeatedly over the loudspeakers at fast-food chains like Maxim’s MX and Café de Coral. For the first time, he saw modular, single-person set meals consisting of soup, rice, and vegetables packaged specifically for solo diners. He realized that advanced urbanization systematically tailors commercial services to single units, a trend that reaches its peak in cities like Tokyo, where 24-hour convenience stores and single-serving amenities make it completely effortless for someone to survive indefinitely without depending on anyone else.

- Dou Wentao laments how technology has altered physical companionship: “When I look at young people today, seeing their state, I feel like I'm getting old.” - Dou Wentao points out the core tension in modern interpersonal behavior: “It seems like nowadays, I feel everyone is more and more like—you can be an island, or you can be connected.” - Advanced urban environments cater to solo survival through small apartments, 24/7 convenience networks, and automated single-person dining arrangements.

[05:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=304s) Mutual Reliance vs. Solitude: Why Give Up Living Alone?

The panel examines the socioeconomic forces behind the surge in single living. Sociologists frequently attribute the phenomenon to the rise in women's economic independence, expanding career opportunities, and cities providing outsourced services—such as dining, housekeeping, and fitness—that previously required domestic division of labor. Dou Wentao raises the question of whether humans inherently wanted to live alone all along, or whether collective living in historical agricultural societies was merely a forced consequence of shared labor and production requirements. Once modern civilization removed the economic necessity of communal survival, individuals naturally gravitated toward solitary autonomy.

Despite acknowledging the dozens of conveniences and freedoms that living alone provides, the speakers debate what valid reason remains for someone to willingly surrender that comfort to live with a partner. Shared domestic life inevitably introduces domestic friction, arguments, and annoyance from constant proximity. However, the panel emphasizes that long-term cohabitation builds an irreplaceable psychological community based on mutual vulnerability. Sharing a physical space over years fosters a deep sense of mutual reliance for survival that consumer conveniences cannot replicate. Dou Wentao admits that while he shares this traditional perspective, he wonders whether clinging to the belief that a life without a partner is unimaginable merely marks them as outdated.

- A panelist defines the core emotional gravity that keeps people together despite interpersonal friction: “To me, it means you feel willing and hopeful to share a living space with this person, that feeling of relying on each other for survival.” - Emphasizing the fundamental value of shared life, the speaker insists: “I don’t think that feeling can be replaced by 100 benefits of living alone.” - The panel notes that agricultural societies necessitated collective domesticity due to shared productive labor, whereas modern consumer services enable total functional independence.

[07:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=443s) Testing the Limits: The International Loneliness Scale

To test how much solitude each person can truly endure, Dou Wentao introduces the popular "International Scale of Loneliness," which ranks solitary activities across ten escalating tiers. The lower tiers—visiting a supermarket alone, dining at a restaurant alone, drinking coffee, or watching a film at a cinema alone—are unanimously accepted by the table as comfortable and ordinary. Even solo hot pot is dismissed as easily manageable today thanks to restaurants accommodating single patrons with individual mini-pots.

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: Tiers of the Solitude Scale accDescr: Progression of solitary activities from common urban habits to extreme individual challenges.

subgraph Low["Manageable Solitude"] L1["Supermarket / Cafe"] --> L2["Solo Dining / Cinema"] L2 --> L3["Solo Hot Pot"] end

subgraph High["High-Resistance Solitude"] L4["Solo KTV / Karaoke"] --> L5["Solo Amusement Park"] L5 --> L6["Moving House Alone"] L6 --> L7["Undergoing Surgery Alone"] end

Low --> High ```

The friction begins at higher levels of the scale. Level six, going to a karaoke booth alone, prompts laughter and resistance. Liang Wendao objects that he cannot accurately be scored on that metric simply because he dislikes karaoke altogether, questioning why anyone who dislikes singing would book an entire private KTV room by themselves. While gazing at the ocean alone is viewed as serene and enjoyable, going to an amusement park alone or moving house completely unassisted presents far greater challenges. Liang Wendao notes he has moved house alone countless times, while undergoing surgery without an escort is recognized as the most extreme scenario.

Recalling an experience with solo amusement parks, a speaker shares a memory from age 17 that left a lasting psychological shadow. Following a family tradition where high school graduates were permitted to take an independent journey, the speaker was given the green light to travel. However, because the family lacked extra money and nobody could accompany him, he was handed a discounted ticket to the United States secured through his father’s friend, leaving him to navigate the trip completely on his own.

- Liang Wendao rejects the metric of singing karaoke alone as a fair evaluation: “This one can't be measured because I don't even like karaoke in the first place.” - Dou Wentao challenges the panel to evaluate their genuine emotional capacity for solitude: “With what we call living alone, how much loneliness can you really handle?” - The discussed tiers of the Loneliness Scale range from everyday activities (supermarkets, dining, movies) to challenging social settings (solo KTV, amusement parks) and intense logistical/physical burdens (moving house alone, undergoing hospital surgery alone).

[09:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=572s) 加州迪士尼的孤獨與遊樂園裡的獨行者

嘉賓回憶起自己年輕時跟旅行團去美國加州迪士尼樂園的經歷。當時父親買了旅行團的行程讓他去,因為沒有人作伴,只能獨自前往。在整個旅行團裡,其他人要麼是兩個人、三個人,要麼是一家四口,唯獨他形單影隻。一個人去坐過山車等刺激項目,害怕驚叫時身邊空無一人;玩到好玩的遊戲想要轉身分享喜悅,身邊也沒有半個聽眾。那種深刻的孤獨感讓他當場暗自發誓,這輩子再也不獨自去遊樂園,甚至連獨自旅行也盡量避免。

竇文濤與其他嘉賓則指出,這種情況屬於典型的「人群中的孤獨」(loneliness within a crowd)。人在成雙成對或闔家出遊的人群包裹下,孑然一身的反差感會被無限放大。然而,這種孤獨在遊樂園中並不罕見。竇文濤提到,自己現在經常被迫陪孩子去迪士尼或海洋公園,排隊排到心煩意亂時,常常會觀察到排隊隊伍裡總有一些單獨前來的年輕女孩。有些人生來就喜歡如孤雁般獨來獨往,在熱鬧的遊樂場中享受專屬於自己的清靜與自在。

[11:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=671s) 帶著速寫本的台灣文青與現代「打卡」獨行族

席間談起多年前認識的一位台灣文藝女孩。那位女生性格安靜、極少開口說話,身邊永遠隨身帶著一本速寫本,無論走到哪裡、看到什麼就默默動筆畫下來。即便旁人坐在她正對面和她搭話,她也只是微微一笑,然後繼續低頭作畫。她最特別的愛好,就是專門挑淡季時獨自去那些空空蕩蕩的遊樂園,一個人漫步其中,安安靜靜地看著旋轉木馬,然後把所有的項目逐一玩遍。

對於這種行為,有人會揣測她是否在刻意沉溺於某種憂鬱與感傷的文藝氛圍,但也有人認為這或許是創作者在尋找靈感,或者單純享受對廢棄、空曠場所的記錄與凝視。竇文濤則進一步對比了當下的現象:如今許多年輕女性獨自出遊或去迪士尼,心境早已與當年的「台灣文藝女青年」大不相同。現代的獨行者身處網絡時代,隨時隨地都在「打卡」拍照、實時聯網直播,不斷向社交圈宣告「今天我來試玩這個新項目」、「給大家看看我拍的照片」,甚至本身就是自媒體網紅。她們將社交網絡當作自己的舞台,整個過程忙碌充實,內心絲毫沒有孤單的容身之處。

[13:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=790s) 旅途中的「非人伴侶」與飛機上的奇妙邂逅

嘉賓們總結出一個獨行規律:那些真正享受獨自旅行的人,往往在身邊擁有一個「非人類的伴侶」。

- 文藝女孩的伴侶是她的畫本與畫筆; - 攝影愛好者獨行時的伴侶就是相機,只要擺弄器材、取景構圖,自己就能跟自己玩得不亦樂乎,根本體會不到寂寞。

話鋒一轉,桌上聊起了在旅途中結識另一半的傳聞。有人打趣周軼君是不是在獨自旅行時「釣」到了現在的先生,甚至傳言兩人是在飛機的頭等艙相遇。周軼君笑著澄清那純屬因工作出差而非獨自旅行,但兩人確實是在飛機上結識的: - 深夜登機後,兩個人碰巧在機艙屏幕上播放著同一個節目; - 男方看著看著睡著了,周軼君醒來後忍不住主動開口問他那個節目的結局是什麼; - 兩人就此打開話匣子,甚至翻看報紙聊起星座。

桌上嘉賓紛紛感嘆這就是命中注定的緣分,笑稱以後坐飛機也要盯著鄰座看什麼電影,立刻切換到同一步調借機搭訕。隨後大家還分享了更神奇的機上軼事:有年輕女性在航班上坐在一位年長紳士旁邊,兩人相談甚歡,聊到最後那位老先生極力向她推銷自己的兒子,最終促成了一段姻緣,在認識丈夫之前先把公公給「搞定」了。

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 旅途中的互動模式對比 accDescr: 展示了獨行時依託物體作為伴侶,與在旅途中通過偶然契機促成人際交往的兩種不同模式。

subgraph SoloCompanion["獨行者的『非人類伴侶』模式"] A["獨自出行者"] --> B["繪畫者的畫本與筆"] A --> C["攝影愛好者的相機鏡頭"] B & C --> D["自給自足,消解孤獨感"] end

subgraph ChanceEncounter["旅途中的偶遇與社交延伸"] E["航班相鄰而坐"] --> F["同步觀看同一節目"] F --> G["探討劇情/星座打破沉默"] G --> H["締結姻緣/認識未來家人"] end ```

[15:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=946s) 獨處與年齡的殘酷反差:從旋轉木馬到煲仔飯

聊到浪漫的獨行體驗時,嘉賓提出了一個犀利的反思:所有關於拿著畫板、端著相機獨自旅行的美好想像,前提往往都建立在當事人是「年輕女孩」的基礎上。在十七八歲或二十幾歲時,一個人背著畫板四處走走停停、吃飯賞景,會被看作是一種詩意;但人會慢慢變老,如果到了三十八歲、四十八歲,一個中年婦女獨自坐在遊樂園的旋轉木馬上啃著一根玉米棒子,那畫面往往不再浪漫,反而容易顯得心酸與淒涼。對此,在座嘉賓給出了不同視角的反駁:

> “自由是不分年齡的,年紀越大,自由越寶貴。”

然而世俗的心理感受常常很難完全擺脫年齡的烙印。一位嘉賓講述了自己在三十多歲時的一段切身經歷:那時他在香港銅鑼灣一個人吃晚餐,走進一家廣東煲仔飯店點了蛇羹和煲仔飯。這時旁邊坐過來一位大約五十歲的中年男子,獨自點了一碗叉燒飯和一碟油菜,默默低頭扒飯。看著那位形單影隻、神情落寞的男人,嘉賓心頭湧起一陣強烈的酸楚與悲哀,當場在心中暗暗發誓:“等我老了以後,絕對不要淪落成這個樣子。”

[17:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=1039s) 孤獨的美食家:從香港茶餐廳到廟街大排檔

面對這份對中年獨自進餐的悲涼感,另一位嘉賓表示自己的心態完全相反,自稱是徹頭徹尾的「孤獨的美食家」(solitary gourmet)。他的美食家之路,恰恰是由長年累月一個人吃飯修煉出來的。

- **獨自吃遍香港**:當年讀研究生兼做助教時,每個月微薄的兼職薪水幾乎全花在吃喝和買書上。為了省錢吃一頓好飯,他寧可每天花一個多小時走路回家。在香港期間,他一個人吃遍了幾乎所有普通日料店與西餐廳。 - **點餐的尷尬與破解之道**:一個人吃西餐或日料尚算方便,吃中餐卻十分棘手。現在市面上應運而生了許多「一人食」餐廳,但在幾十年前,一個人去中餐廳點菜往往很難施展。 - **假裝米其林密探的趣事**:因為頻繁一個人去各家餐館,很多店家都認得他。他摸索出一個能讓店家格外熱情招待的「秘訣」——獨自坐在桌前點菜用餐時,默默掏出一個筆記本在上面寫寫畫畫。店員和老闆往往會誤以為他是微服私訪的米其林評審或神秘美食評論家,立刻端出店裡最拿手的招牌菜伺候。 - **廟街大圓桌的解法**:為了解決一個人吃中餐炒菜的難題,他後來找到了廟街的大排檔。那裡擺放著大圓桌供互不相識的食客拼桌共坐,幾十年前的廟街,一碟炒小菜只要幾塊錢港幣,完美契合了單人品嘗鑊氣小炒的需求。

[19:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=1141s) 旺角與廟街的「獨食」與獨處之樂

嘉賓回憶起年輕時在香港平民食肆的獨特體驗:十幾塊錢就能點上一盤泥鰍,與十來個人拼桌同吃。那時除了他自己是個年輕人,周圍坐的全是孤獨的老伯。香港人不喝二鍋頭,桌上放的都是雙蒸酒;大家一邊喝,話匣子一打開,彼此便熱絡地聊了起來。那時他還特別喜歡去旺角的書店看書,看完書便獨自下樓吃碗牛腩麵、點份牛肚、喝一瓶雙蒸。十幾歲就過著這種如同落魄孤獨老人的吃喝生活,鄰座彼此相識,毫無悽慘之感,反而自在快活。席間女嘉賓也笑著分享了一段經歷:「曾有男孩子跟我表白,說以後再也不讓我一個人吃飯了,我想『哎,我挺喜歡一個人吃飯的』。」這種對獨處的不理解,反而造成了啼笑皆非的錯位。

這種「單槍匹馬」的獨處衝動,在香港的草根市井中隨處可見。嘉賓形容廟街那些著名的「平民夜總會」:門口傳出震耳欲聾的音樂,推門一看,滿屋子全是隻身前來的中老年阿伯;他們有的自己點歌上臺唱,有的坐在臺下聽著已由年輕小姐唱成中年阿姨的歌女演唱,並在臺下熱烈鼓掌。整條街上都是這樣的單身男子——他們家裡或許有老婆,但依然選擇獨自跑出來透氣打發時間。這種群體性卻又各自獨立的狀態,正是人們追求個人自由、享受獨處的鮮活寫照。

- **香港平民日常**:十幾港元的平價泥鰍拼桌、旺角書店樓下的牛肚牛腩麵搭雙蒸酒。 - **廟街平民夜總會**:滿室皆是獨自出行的阿伯叔伯,聽老牌歌女唱歌鼓掌,享受遠離家庭瑣碎的個人空間。

---

[21:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=1267s) 天才的獨處特權與幸福對創作的「損害」

話題進一步轉向思想家與創作者對孤獨的剛性需求。叔本華等哲人的結論認為,卓越的頭腦往往有著離群索居的強烈傾向,獨處對他們而言近乎生命必需品。愛因斯坦便是一個典型範例:他的妻子曾對其怪癖頗有微詞,因為愛因斯坦需要長期獨自在一間屋子裡閉關思考,甚至時常會突然「消失」整整一週,跑到瑞士等地獨自划著一隻小船,在水面上反覆推演物理學難題。儘管夫妻感情甚篤,妻子卻始終覺得他有很大一部分靈魂處在常人無法觸碰的維度。倘若強行把這樣的人拉入繁雜瑣碎的世俗社交,對其精神無疑是一種嚴重的磨損。

除了一般社交的損耗,甚至連「家庭幸福」本身都可能成為創作的阻礙。嘉賓談及諾貝爾文學獎得主奧爾罕·帕慕克(Orhan Pamuk)的一段往事:帕慕克陪前妻在美國讀博士期間,兩人如膠似漆地生活在一起,那段日子卻被他形容為創作生命中最痛苦的時期。究其原因,並非因為不幸,而是「因為太幸福了」。極度的幸福與安逸徹底扼殺了他的寫作靈感,導致他一個字也寫不出來。

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: 帕慕克的心理空間轉換法 accDescr: 展示帕慕克如何在同一空間內透過外出散步建立創作心態 subgraph S1["心理障礙"] A["家庭生活過於幸福安逸"] --> B["生活與寫作空間重疊"] B --> C["寫作靈感完全停滯"] end subgraph S2["虛擬儀式"] C --> D["清晨著裝整齊出門"] D --> E["在外步行散步15分鐘"] E --> F["原路折返回到同一個家"] end subgraph S3["心理催眠效果"] F --> G["心理暗示:已抵達外部工作室"] G --> H["重新開啟專注寫作狀態"] end ```

為了打破這種幸福帶來的靈感困境,帕慕克在沒有多餘資金租用獨立工作室的情況下,發明了一套自我催眠的儀式:每天早晨穿戴整齊出門,在外連續走上十五分鐘,然後轉身折返回家;經過這半小時的折返步行,他便在心理上完成了「生活空間」到「辦公室/工作室」的轉換,從而重新獲得寫作所需的距離感。對此,女嘉賓敏銳地反思:作家能公開傾訴並獲得世人理解,但他的妻子是否有發聲平臺來表達自己的處境?這正如維吉尼亞·吳爾芙(Virginia Woolf)多年前的名言——女人必須有一間屬於自己的房間。

> 嘉賓深刻剖析幸福對創作的潛在阻礙:“Living together as if they were a married couple, he said it was almost the most painful period in his life, his creative life.”

---

[24:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=1455s) 竇文濤的「宅男標本」與孤獨的本質

在探討孤獨與自由的邊界時,竇文濤主動提供自己作為一個「心理標本」供大家剖析。他坦言自己雖然明白「孤獨」與「寂寞」這兩個詞彙,但內心深處似乎完全沒有這類感受,甚至打趣懷疑自己是不是「有病」或「內心過於空虛」。竇文濤的日常生活被極度繁瑣的細節填得滿滿當當:早晨起床邊吃早餐邊看書,囤積的大量英劇、美劇和國產劇根本看不完,還要為《圓桌派》備課,每天雷打不動在跑步機上跑一小時。即便連續兩週不出門,他也從未感到空虛或孤單。然而,長時間離群索居也帶來了一種奇特的後遺症:當他一個月不見人,偶然被隔壁好友叫去聚會時,出門走向鄰居家那幾步路,胸口居然會心跳加速、臉色發紅,產生一種「太久沒聞到人味」的莫名的社交亢奮。

對話隨即深入到孤獨的哲學定義:真正的孤獨並非無所事事的無聊,亦非單純缺乏玩伴,而是對自我作為「絕對獨立個體」的清醒體認。一位嘉賓回憶起自己童年時第一次體會到孤獨的瞬間,正是在放學後喧鬧的人潮中:當時他騎著自行車往學校走,身邊無數同學和路人擦肩而過,那一剎那他的意識彷彿抽離了肉體,在後腦勺上方俯瞰著自己,清醒地意識到自己與眼前這群人毫無共通之處,天地間僅有孤身一人。

現代城市青年所頻繁感受到的孤獨感亦是如此:身邊全都是活生生的人、同學或熟人,但依然感到形單影隻、無人相通。這正應了泰戈爾詩中所寫的行於人海卻感受不到愛的荒涼,以及中國古語「翻手作雲覆手雨,紛紛輕薄何須數」背後的知音難覓——「天下何人不識君,但無一人是知己」。但嘉賓進一步強調,這甚至超越了「缺乏知己」的感嘆,而是一種更加純粹、近乎本能的個體意識覺醒。隨後嘉賓將飄忽的哲學思辨拉回現實層面:當下許許多多年輕人的獨居,並非出自形而上的文人感傷,而是背井離鄉成為「北漂」或異鄉客後,身邊確實空無一人、不得不面對的生存實態。

> 竇文濤剖析自己在人海與孤獨中的普遍感受:“Acquaintances all over the world. But not one who truly knows you.”

[028:32] 现代生产方式与“原子化”生活习惯

窦文涛与嘉宾们探讨了现代生产方式如何重塑人们的情感与居住模式。随着现代社会的发展,个体日益呈现出“原子化”(atomized)趋势,人们对自己生活品质的要求也越来越具体而微。这种生活方式深刻影响了夫妻间的日常相处,长期的独居或分居甚至让重聚变成一种负担。

窦文涛举了一个身边女性朋友的真实例子:这位女士因客观原因与丈夫长期分居两地。步入三四十岁之后,她向窦文涛坦言,起初自己也渴望两人生活在一起,但习惯独居后,心态彻底改变了。即使丈夫每个月抽出一周时间飞回来看她,她非但没有感到甜蜜,反而觉得是一种麻烦和打扰。她习惯了牙刷摆在特定的位置,习惯了穿着邋遢的睡衣在厨房随便弄点东西吃,或者某天早晨不想吃早餐就可以不吃。窦文涛引述她的原话:“当你丈夫真的来的时候,我觉得很别扭,很麻烦,我甚至开始想:‘你什么时候走?’”

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: 现代独居习惯对亲密关系的重塑 accDescr: 展示从资本主义生产方式到个体习惯固化,再到亲密共处产生摩擦的心态转变路径。

subgraph 外部变迁 A["现代生产方式"] --> B["个体原子化与独立"] end

subgraph 生活常态 B --> C["固定的个人生活习惯<br/>(作息、物品摆放、着装)"] end

subgraph 亲密关系重组 C --> D["伴侣同处产生不适与麻烦"] D --> E["期盼回归独立空间<br/>(“你什么时候走?”)"] end ```

[029:51] “太空人”家庭与同屋异室的电话沟通

长久分居所塑造的生活模式,在家庭重新聚合时往往会引发新的危机。窦文涛提到自己的一位朋友是典型的“太空人”(即长期与家人分居两地的跨国工作者)。他独自一人在北京打拼,而全家人都生活在国外,这种状态持续了将近二十年。

后来妻子和家人觉得分居快二十年很不正常,决定结束这种状态,一家人搬回北京团聚。然而共同生活不久,摩擦与小争吵便接踵而至。出人意料的是他们化解矛盾的奇特方式:在长达二十年的跨国生活中,两人养成了每天通长途电话的习惯,每天半小时的电话聊天是维系感情的惬意方式。同住一个屋檐下后,一旦发生矛盾,两人不是当面争吵,而是各自退回不同的房间,拿起电话隔空沟通,把在家里给对方打电话的习惯一直延续至今。

嘉宾们纷纷拿这种奇妙的隔空互动开玩笑,调侃这宛如李嘉诚般的生活方式——想看电影还得在客厅碰头,仿佛需要提前安排车马或让菲佣备好咖啡,在各自的套间里提前预约三分钟后再见面。

[031:35] 独立代价:年轻人为什么不愿在亲密关系中妥协

话题由此转向当代年轻人的恋爱与同居观念。嘉宾指出,现在许多大学生和青年在寻找伴侣时,倾向于“即使恋爱也最好不要一直住在一起”,维持独门独户、相邻而居的理想状态,犹如伍迪·艾伦(Woody Allen)几十年前在曼哈顿电影里展现的生活方式,而这种方式正被越来越多年轻人奉为优选。

嘉宾们分析,这种选择的核心原因在于不愿牺牲与妥协。独居有十个好处与十个坏处,同居亦然。共同生活就像花钱买票去演唱会现场一样,本质是为了与对方处于“同一时空”共享存在感,但同居必须付出妥协的代价——谁先刷牙、谁洗碗,都牵扯到琐碎的分工。对于当今年轻人而言,付出牺牲不再被视为理所应当,甚至“连妥协都算不上了,它成了委屈”。

- 独居与同居各具利弊,关键在于个体是否愿意放弃绝对的自由去包容对方的生活细节。 - 共同生活的物理在场感与情感价值,在日常琐碎事务的摩擦前变得脆弱。 - “现在的二十几岁的人基本上不愿牺牲,在他们看来,牺牲感觉就像是一种委屈。”

[033:18] 代际差异:从女大学生的“照顾”到独生一代的“灾难现场”

窦文涛将60年代出生的群体与90后、00后进行了对比。他回忆道,60年代上大学时,男女同学谈恋爱,女生跑到男生宿舍往往满心欢喜地主动帮男朋友甚至整个宿舍洗衣服。那种氛围并非出于当下所批评的“保姆”心态,而是当时女性普遍认为男生不懂生活自理,觉得自己更懂如何收拾和打理日子。

窦文涛明确表示自己并不推崇旧时代的不平等观念,但现代观念早已发生逆转:每个人都是家里的独生子女和“掌上明珠”,没人觉得谁生来就该照顾谁。周轶君谈到自己去一位年轻女孩家留宿的经历,那女孩正处于失恋中,房间凌乱得宛如“灾难现场”,让她忍不住感叹在这样的环境下心碎恐怕很难痊愈,自己甚至只想赶紧逃离。这种变化揭示出现代年轻人正在彻底摆脱旧有的依附与照顾模式,迈向平等的独立,但同时也失去了彼此照料的耐受力。

[035:33] 全球独居浪潮与中国流动人口的生存现实

对独居现象的讨论随后上升到了社会学与经济学层面。周轶君与窦文涛列举数据指出,独居在过去十年中已成为全球性趋势,全球独居人口比例增长了33%;虽然中国受传统观念影响,独居率相对保持在14%左右,但独居现象在发展中国家伴随着中产阶层的壮大和急剧的城乡流动而迅速扩散。

嘉宾们认为,许多中国年轻人的独居并非主观上浪漫的哲学选择,而是不可避免的现实所致: - 大量年轻人从农村、县城或三四线城市涌入北上广深求学与工作,既有的熟人网络被连根拔起,不可能立即买房成家,只能独自面对陌生人际圈。 - 由于一线城市单人租房成本高昂,青年公寓和合租模式大行其道,年轻人在高压现实下被迫摸索自处方式。 - 经济学数据显示,中国在过去二十年经历了全球最大规模的人口流动与伴生的高速城镇化。 - 南北方流动格局存在显著差异:长三角和浙沪等沿海区域已形成紧密的城市群,卫星城与核心城市的落差正在被现代物流逐渐抹平;年轻人即便不挤在中心城区,生活品质也相差无几。

讨论最后,窦文涛展示了几张北漂女孩爆改三十余平方米出租屋的照片。女孩刚搬进去时,屋况残破不堪、墙皮剥落,但她花了一个月时间亲手刷墙改造,展现了漂泊年轻人如何在逼仄简陋的空间中顽强构筑属于自己的独立精神角落。

[38:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=2305s) Spatial Limits and Hong Kong Living Arrangements

The discussion begins with an examination of how physical living space dictates quality of life. In a small apartment of thirty square meters, a person can still live with flavor and elegance, managing to cook a few simple dishes in a compact kitchen. At thirty square meters, there is sufficient room to cultivate an "exquisite" lifestyle regardless of wealth, because that amount of space provides enough psychological breathing room and motivation to decorate and build a comfortable routine. By contrast, living in an eight-square-meter room strips away any pretense of lifestyle aesthetics. One speaker notes living in a seven-square-meter space in Guangzhou, while another recounts that in an eight-square-meter space, life is reduced to mere survival, where eating, sleeping, and existing happen in the same tight box, reminiscent of a Hong Kong coffin home or a refrigerator box: “In my eight-square-meter room, I did everything there—eating, sleeping, everything.”

Recalling his early days arriving in Hong Kong, a speaker shares the experience of apartment hunting with an agent and being housed in a two-bedroom unit of roughly forty square meters with the renowned Chinese music producer Huang Xiaomao. The shared flat had a peculiar aesthetic: both the carpet and the walls were entirely purple. Two adult men living in an all-purple room drew bemused reactions from visiting friends. The close quarters quickly generated friction; simple habits like making lengthy phone calls tied up the landline, sparking constant annoyance. After enduring a year of shared living, both decided to move out on their own: “We swore we couldn't do it anymore; it was hard to adapt to living together, and we had to live alone.”

This spatial compression is typical in Hong Kong, leading local families to develop tacit rules of flexibility and politeness. For instance, when a young daughter living with her parents and siblings announces at dinner that her boyfriend will be visiting at 8:30 PM, the family immediately grasps the cue. By 8:25 PM, everyone invents a polite reason to clear out: the younger sister leaves for karaoke, the brother heads out to play soccer, and the father claims he is heading downstairs to watch the neighborhood ladies square-dancing—a knowing joke, since the "lady" dancing is his own wife.

- Living space threshold: Thirty square meters is viewed as the baseline where an individual has the mental incentive and physical room to live "exquisitely," whereas seven to eight square meters reduces living to the level of a coffin home. - The shared purple apartment: Two grown men sharing a 40-square-meter, two-bedroom flat with purple walls and purple carpet, leading to friction over shared telephone lines. - Hong Kong family evacuation etiquette: A household clearing out within five minutes so a dating family member can have privacy with a visitor.

---

[41:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=2482s) The Panic of Solitary Illness and the Art of Solitude

Living completely alone introduces severe vulnerabilities, especially regarding physical emergencies and health scares. A speaker describes experiencing episodes of cardiac neurosis and sheer panic in the middle of the night in Beijing. After drinking baijiu, a heart rate spiking over one hundred beats per minute creates terrifying ambiguity: is it simply the physiological effect of alcohol, or an acute medical crisis? With alcohol dominating the first half of the night and terror seizing the second half, the person is left clutching a smartphone in bed, finger hovering over the emergency dial. The vulnerability of solitary existence becomes stark: “At those moments, I’d think, "Is this it? Am I going to go just like that?" Who would even know? Who would call for help for you?” The speakers cite the tragic precedent of author Eileen Chang, whose death went unnoticed in her apartment for approximately two weeks. This highlights the practical necessity of personal safety systems, such as the emergency "life alarm" buttons commonly installed for Hong Kong seniors or fall-detection smartwatches.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Vulnerability vs. Contentment in Solitude accDescr: Contrasting the acute risks of medical emergencies when living alone with the self-sufficient peace of solitary intellectual life.

subgraph PanicState["The Vulnerability of Solitary Living"] A["Late-Night Health Episode"] --> B["Uncertainty: Alcohol vs. Cardiac Event"] B --> C["Clutching Phone for Ambulance"] C --> D["Risk of Undetected Death (e.g., Eileen Chang)"] end

subgraph SelfSufficiency["The Independent Solitary State"] E["Retirement & Daily Opera"] --> F["No Interpersonal / Career Demands"] F --> G["'Having no desires makes one strong'"] G --> H["Complete Inner Equilibrium"] end ```

In sharp contrast to the anxiety of illness, another speaker presents the portrait of an English university teacher who perfected the art of solitary living. Now retired, the man lives entirely alone without visible longing for external validation or companionship. His daily routine consists of listening to opera, traveling, and writing unusually detailed, expansive replies to short emails. He embodies the classical sentiment that having no desires makes one strong: “Other than that, I’ve noticed his vibe is exactly what we call "having no desires makes one strong"; it’s as if he has no demands of the outside world at all.” He neither pursues wealth and status nor expends energy managing complex social ties, proving that certain temperaments can achieve genuine contentment in total independence.

---

[43:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=2634s) "Being Alone Together" and Marital Freedom

The panel reflects on whether the drive for companionship and family is an immutable biological necessity or an individual variable. While some individuals live their entire lives in healthy independence, others left alone in a room for prolonged periods develop psychological friction, often exhibiting extreme sensitivity and over-analyzing casual remarks from others.

To bridge the gap between individual autonomy and companionship, the speakers examine the dynamic captured in the film *Iris*, based on the marriage between Oxford feminist philosopher and novelist Iris Murdoch and literature professor John Bayley. When reflecting on the crowning beauty of their decades-long union, Bayley identified the state of "being alone together." This structure provides emotional security without forfeiting autonomy: “Simply put, it means that while you can rely on each other, you still have your own freedom and personal space.”

To illustrate this balance, a speaker describes his own marriage to a writer. Recognizing that her creative output requires a totally uninhibited spirit, the couple maintains an agreement: roughly every six months, she leaves home for one or two weeks to stay in an artistic retreat surrounded by musicians and painters. He purposefully refrains from interrogating her about her time away, knowing that privacy is essential to her process. After this period of creative solitude, she returns refreshed to family life, demonstrating that modern partnerships thrive when both partners preserve an independent sphere within the commitment.

---

[46:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=2800s) The Outsourcing of Family Functions in Modern Society

The discussion broadens into an analysis of how modernity has transformed household structures. In traditional extended families, the constant demand to integrate into a collective social body often inflicted psychological harm and suppressed individuality. Today, economic progress grants individuals the freedom to inhabit their own separate worlds. However, this shift is only possible because the historical functions of the family have been systematically detached from the home and absorbed by public institutions.

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: Modern Socialization of Household Functions accDescr: Tracing the historical transition of family duties from domestic execution to societal outsourcing.

subgraph TraditionalFamily["Traditional Domestic Scope"] A["Childbirth"] B["Medical Convalescence"] C["End-of-Life Care & Death"] end

subgraph ModernSocialServices["Socialized Services"] D["Hospitals & Maternity Wards"] E["Professional Elder Care"] F["Emergency Tech & Single-User Appliances"] end

TraditionalFamily -->|"Institutional Outsourcing"| ModernSocialServices ```

Historically, birth, aging, illness, and death all transpired within the domestic sphere. In modern society, childbirth takes place in hospitals, illness is treated in specialized clinics, and end-of-life care is managed by external services. In countries with exceptionally high rates of single-person households, such as Japan, elder care, smart emergency buttons, and specialized household appliances are tailored specifically for solo dwellers. When technology and market services can fulfill every physical and emergency need formerly provided by kin, cohabitation ceases to be an absolute practical necessity: “When your needs can be met by strangers or technology, do you truly still need someone else to live with you?” The panel concludes that rising wealth and institutional infrastructure inevitably facilitate solitary living: “That is to say, the wealthier and more developed a place is, the more conditions it creates for living alone.”

[48:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=2929s) 从实用需求到纯粹关系:生命共同体的浪漫解读

嘉宾们深入探讨了伴侣步入中老年后依然选择生活在同一空间下的深层本质。有观点指出,在当前的许多生活境况下,一个人其实更有理由选择不去独居;两个人住在一起,已经不再仅仅是为了生活上互相照应的“实用性需求”(practical need),而是升华成了一种剥离功利目的的“纯粹关系”。

大家顺着这一思路展开感叹,认为这种状态十分浪漫,真正称得上是一种“生命共同体”。正如嘉宾所生动阐释的伴侣独白:“I am with you not so you can take care of me when I'm sick, not so you can clean up after me when I die, and not so you can cook for me. I just want to be with you in this space.”(我和你在一起,不是为了生病时让你照顾我,不是为了死后让你帮我料理后事,也不是为了让你给我做饭,我只是想在这个空间里和你待在一起)。

这段真挚的话语引得现场频频点头称赞,有人打趣道,台下的妻子和嫂子都在不住地点头赞同,直夸“说得太好了”。同行嘉宾见状立刻笑着揭底和调侃,称他平时就老把这些漂亮话挂在嘴边,桌旁众人随即附和打趣:“老婆在场就是不一样”,在温馨又幽默的气氛中达成了对亲密关系本质的共鸣。

## Notable quotes > [15:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=946s) 自由是不分年齡的,年紀越大,自由越寶貴。

> [31:35](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=1895s) 现在的二十几岁的人基本上不愿牺牲,在他们看来,牺牲感觉就像是一种委屈。

> [48:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=2929s) I am with you not so you can take care of me when I'm sick, not so you can clean up after me when I die, and not so you can cook for me. I just want to be with you in this space.

> [46:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=2800s) When your needs can be met by strangers or technology, do you truly still need someone else to live with you?

> [46:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg&t=2800s) the wealthier and more developed a place is, the more conditions it creates for living alone.

## Mentioned 窦文涛, 梁文道, 周轶君, 黄小茂, 张爱玲, Iris Murdoch, John Bayley, Orhan Pamuk, Virginia Woolf, Woody Allen, Arthur Schopenhauer, Albert Einstein, Rabindranath Tagore, 李嘉诚, 美心MX, 大家乐, 加州迪士尼乐园, 海洋公园, Iris

## Video description 💡订阅我们,换个视角看懂万象: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwiWVn-hZq3_zuOk570kyGA

简介:《圆桌派》节目以圆桌为名,旨在体现圆桌席上人人平等,每期由窦文涛携手三位嘉宾,还原在生活中发生在圆桌旁、海阔天空的精彩聊天。延续真实不“装”的窦式主持风格,立足网络,放眼世间,神侃包罗万象的话题,嬉笑言谈中彼此迸发出智慧火花。

【圆桌派 窦文涛】人性 · 社会 · 认知:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYxKs_Kmt18U 【鸿观·宋鸿兵】金融 · 权力 · 逻辑:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLcTh2pbxeb-o 【观复嘟嘟 马未都】历史 · 收藏 · 人生:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLOBX8CQ3IYr0 【第一人称复数 周轶君】青年 · 女性 · 世界:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLE0SKDns16wY 【风马牛书房 冯仑】财富 · 经济 · 规律:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBtYaSLkGpag 【百家新说 尹烨】科技 · 生命 · 未来:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIUyn5AuyYUo 【众生 蔡永康】人物 · 命运 · 社会观察:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIOgZ1dPF0JA 【锵锵行天下 窦文涛】世界 · 文明 · 思想:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIJzYJ5gZ-HA

#中国未来 #中国社会 #植物 #生态 #大自然 #经济 #推荐 #热门 #经济 #圆桌派 #纪实 #时间 #历史 #文化 #聊天 #新闻 #心理健康 #中美关系 #科技 #经济 #金融 #香港 #台湾 #hongkong #taiwan #民生 #纪实 #纪录片 #窦文涛 #周轶君 #马未都 #许子东 #尹烨 #圆桌派第七季 #圆桌派 #中国经济 #中国内卷 #中国危机 #地方债 #新能源车 #光伏 #经济危机 #中国房地产 #中美竞争 #科技创新 #制度决定一切 #民营经济 #企业家精神 #AI时代

[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2XzUyJO3Wg)

中文简报

窦文涛梁文道剖析独居潮:公共服务外包令家庭告别实用共居 现代社会将医疗与照料功能全面外包降低了独居门槛,使伴侣共同生活从满足生存互助的实用刚需,升华为剥离功利目的的纯粹精神连接。 节目从现代家庭规模缩小与“分房睡”、青年公寓“共居”等居住现象切入,深入剖析了都市化与个体“原子化”生活方式对亲密关系的重塑。嘉宾们对照了国际孤独等级表、自身独处及合租经验,探讨了创作与自由对独立空间的刚性需求,以及独自生病等现实脆弱性。最后指出,随着现代社会将生老病死等传统家庭功能高度外包,夫妻或伴侣选择生活在同一空间,已从过去互为照料的实用互助,升华为超越功利的“生命共同体”与“纯粹关系”。 家庭结构历史演进正走向极致原子化,挪威与瑞典等北欧国家的独居户比例已超过50%,催生了兼顾私密卧室与庞大公共社交空间的新型青年共居(Co-living)模式。 (0:01) 家庭传统职能的全面社会化外包是独居潮的核心支撑,生老病死等事务逐步由医院、养老院与智能急救设备承担,使共同生活不再是生理生存的绝对必需。 (46:40) 亲密关系正从以分工照料为目的的实用性结合,转向“一起独处”(Being alone together)与剥离功利目的的纯粹“生命共同体”。 (43:54) 当代青年更倾向设立严格的物理与心理边界,“住隔壁的伴侣”成为理想形态,因独处习惯的固化使得关系中的妥协极易被感知为个人委屈。 (3:10)

Reading summary

竇文濤與嘉賓們探討了現代社會中家庭規模縮減與獨居浪潮的成因,指出隨著城市商業與社會保障體系對傳統家庭功能的承接,共同生活已從生存必需轉化為一種剥離實用功利、追求精神自主的「純粹關係」。 家庭結構的歷史收縮與共居實驗 (0:01) 從人類發展歷程來看,居住形態經歷了從原始宗族、四代同堂、核心家庭到當前單身或丁克家庭的持續收縮。在北歐的挪威與瑞典,單人戶在總戶數中的佔比已超過50%,而全球獨居人口在過去十年間也增長了33%。中國的獨居率雖然維持在14%左右,但隨著急劇的城鄉流動與高昂的居住成本,大量異鄉青年被迫進入單身或合租狀態。 針對現代人的孤獨與空間訴求,新型「青年公寓」或共居模式應運而生。梁文道指出,現代獨居並非傳統意義上的絕對孤立;以廣州等地的青年公寓為例,住戶既擁有獨立封閉的臥室空間,又能共享底層的客廳、廚房、健身房等社交設施,展現出一種兼顧個體私密性與群體連結的新型居住形態。 高度城市化下的個體原子化與獨立成本 (3:10) 現代都市的成熟商業網絡極大降低了單人生活的門檻。從香港連鎖快餐的單人套餐,到日本東京遍佈的24小時便利店與單人食餐廳,外包服務徹底替代了過去依賴家庭分工的家務與照料功能。然而,這種生活方式也導致個體日益「原子化」,對個人空間與獨立作息的控制慾隨之上升,甚至演變成即使同處一室也寧願用手機隔空溝通、或推崇「住在隔壁的伴侶」等相處模式。 這種高度固化的獨立習慣反向增加了共同生活的摩擦成本。嘉賓們分析,當今年輕人在親密關係中對妥協與犧牲的耐受度顯著降低,洗衣、洗碗或物品擺放等日常瑣事極易被視為委屈。長期的分離生活甚至會使伴侶的探訪變成一種打破既有常態的心理打擾。 家庭功能的社會外包與純粹關係的重塑 (46:40) 在傳統社會中,生產協同、生老病死全都在家庭內部解決;而在現代發達地區,醫療門診接管了疾病治療,專業機構與科技照料分擔了養老與臨終,緊急呼叫設備亦降低了獨居猝逝的即時風險。當科技與陌生人市場能夠滿足生存的物質與應急底線時,因依附而維繫的家庭紐帶必然鬆動。 在這種背景下,伴侶在經歷中年後依然選擇同處一個屋檐下,其性質發生了根本性轉變。嘉賓們認為,這標誌著親密關係從滿足搭伙過日子的實用性需求,升華為一種真正的「生命共同體」——同居不再是為了生病時有人照料或死後有人料理後事,而是出於自願共享同一物理與心理空間的純粹聯結。 「各得其所的共處」與個人心靈邊界 (43:54) 如何在維持緊密承諾的同時避免個體意志被家庭瑣碎吞噬,成為現代親密關係的核心課題。嘉賓們援引作家艾莉絲·梅鐸(Iris Murdoch)與丈夫約翰·貝利(John Bayley)的婚姻狀態,提出「各得其所的共處」(being alone together)是理想的情感平衡——雙方在彼此依託的同時,各自保有不被打擾的自由。 這種邊界感對於思想家與創作者尤為關鍵。愛因斯坦需要長期閉關與獨自泛舟思考,作家帕慕克曾因婚後生活過於安逸幸福而陷入靈感枯竭,不得不借助清晨出門步行折返的心理儀式來催眠自己「抵達工作室」。健康的現代家庭模式,要求伴侶雙方主動為彼此保留一間屬於自己的精神房間,定期容許各自獨立抽離,再重新回歸家庭生活。 當物質豐裕與現代服務徹底賦予了個人獨居的便利與自由時,傳統家庭共同體面臨瓦解的考驗;伴侶能否在克服日常瑣碎摩擦與維護個人精神邊界之間取得平衡,成為決定現代親密關係質量的核心懸念。

精炼阅读摘要

窦文涛与梁文道、周轶君等嘉宾在节目中探讨指出,现代社会生产方式的转变与公共服务的完善促使家庭单元不断微型化,独居已成为全球性常态;伴侣关系也随之从传统的生存依赖转变为追求个人边界的“纯粹关系”。 家庭结构变迁与原子化生存 (0:01) 人类居住单元从远古的血缘家族、四世同堂逐步缩小为核心家庭、丁克家庭,乃至单人户。目前在瑞典和挪威等北欧国家,独居户比例已超过50%;全球独居人口在过去十年增长了33%,中国独居率也约为14%。在高度城市化与市场化环境中,单人便当、二十四小时便利店及社会化家政彻底剥离了家庭原本承担的生产与照护职能。当生老病死均可外包给医院与养老机构,个体独立生活的物质门槛被大幅降低。 针对这种孤立状态,现代青年公寓发展出“共居”(co-living)形态,以独立的私人卧室搭配共享客厅、厨房与健身房,呈现类似大学宿舍的高密度社交。与此同时,城市青年的亲密关系边界发生位移,不少人推崇“住在隔壁的男朋友”模式,追求物理上既便于探访又互不侵犯私密领地的独立节点状态。 同居妥协与独处心理耐受 同居要求让渡个人习惯并承担家务分工,年轻一代在独生子女背景与高度个体化影响下,对生活细节的妥协耐受度显著下降,往往将迁就视作“委屈”。对长年分居的夫妻而言,重聚甚至会打破个体固化的生活节律。窦文涛引述案例说明,长期分居两地的妻子面对返家的丈夫反而感到节奏被扰乱;另一对跨国分居近二十年的夫妻同住一屋后,遇到矛盾依然选择躲进各自房间通过长途电话沟通。 关于独处能力的讨论引入了涵盖十个等级的“国际孤独等级表”。虽然独自逛超市、就餐或吃火锅已被城市生活广泛接纳,但独自去游乐园、独自搬家乃至独自接受手术仍对心理构成极大挑战。然而,独行并非必然伴随凄凉,身怀画笔或相机的创作者往往能借助“非人类伴侣”自得其乐,新一代青年也常通过网络直播与打卡将游玩转变为充实的个人表达。 居住空间阈值与孤身病痛风险 (38:25) 个体的精神状态深受居住物理空间的制约。三十平方米的居室通常被视作维持体面生活与心理呼吸空间的底线,而压缩到七至八平方米的极窄居室(如香港的“棺材房”)则让生活退化为纯粹的生理维持。早年两人合租四十平方米公寓的经历表明,极度逼仄的物理环境会迅速放大电话占线等日常摩擦;而香港本土家庭因空间拥挤,甚至演化出当子女有约会对象来访时全家在数分钟内礼貌回避的默契。 完全独居最大的现实隐患在于突发疾病与急救缺失。嘉宾谈及夜间心悸发作时手握手机悬在急救键上的濒死恐慌,并援引作家张爱玲离世两周后才被发现的惨痛先例,凸显出独居群体对智能防跌倒手环、紧急报警按钮等安全保障机制的刚性依赖。相对地,部分退休学者或作家则能凭借彻底摒除世俗欲求的自足状态,在听歌剧、旅行或构思中达成平静。 从功能搭子到生命共同体 (43:54) 过度紧密的朝夕相处可能对智识生活构成磨损。叔本华曾阐述杰出头脑对孤僻的需求,爱因斯坦在物理思考时常独自泛舟或闭关;诺贝尔文学奖得主帕慕克在陪读期间因生活过于幸福甜蜜而一度陷入创作瘫痪,最终必须依赖每天出门步行十五分钟再折返回家的心理仪式,在虚构中重建“工作室”与“家”的区隔。弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫亦早早提出,女性要进行创作必须拥有一间属于自己的房间。 伴侣间化解摩擦的有效路径在于达成英国作家约翰·贝利与哲学家艾丽斯·默多克式的“在一起却各自独处”(being alone together)。当外包服务化解了做饭、照料和送终的实用约束后,中老年伴侣选择共处一室不再是出于功能性互助,而是升华成一种剥离功利诉求的纯粹联结,构筑起一种彼此守望却保留各自自由的生命共同体。 现代社会以充沛的物质条件赋予了个体前所未有的独处自由,却也加剧了突发健康危机时的孤立风险与日常摩擦;当家庭从传统的生产和养老功能中松绑后,如何在保全个人独立空间的同时维系不带功利目的的亲密联结,成为当代人面临的核心命题。

Source quotes

[15:46] 自由是不分年齡的,年紀越大,自由越寶貴。 [31:35] 现在的二十几岁的人基本上不愿牺牲,在他们看来,牺牲感觉就像是一种委屈。 [48:49] I am with you not so you can take care of me when I'm sick, not so you can clean up after me when I die, and not so you can cook for me. I just want to be with you in this space. [46:40] When your needs can be met by strangers or technology, do you truly still need someone else to live with you? [46:40] the wealthier and more developed a place is, the more conditions it creates for living alone.

Original transcript

[0:01] Surveys show that most married families [0:03] also have this desire and need for their [0:06] own individual rooms. [0:10] For instance, couples might say, "If [0:12] conditions allow, I would like to have [0:14] my own room, and my partner would have [0:16] theirs." [0:19] >> Look at us, worrying about humanity [0:22] again. [0:23] >> Human living patterns have, of course, [0:25] evolved from early animal-like communal [0:27] living, [0:28] >> then transitioned into clans, and now, [0:30] for example, to the two-person couple [0:33] family. [0:34] We went from four generations under one [0:36] roof, to three, to two, and now to [0:38] two-person households or DINK families. [0:42] In fact, in the U.S. there is already a [0:44] significant proportion, and we know in [0:46] places like Northern Europe—Norway and [0:49] Sweden—more than half are living alone. [0:52] >> So, living alone means living by oneself [0:55] . And like Jiahui's situation, where [0:57] even married couples want their own [0:59] personal space, Wendao, what do you [1:01] think this reflects about human [1:03] evolutionary trends? [1:04] >> I don't know. [1:06] I really don't know, but the issue is, I [1:08] think conversely, many people living [1:10] alone today aren't in the traditional [1:12] sense, because "co-living" is quite [1:15] popular now. Living together. Yes. [1:17] >> Have you never heard of co-living? [1:19] >> Co-living is a type where, theoretically [1:20] , they are living alone, but it doesn't [1:22] really count as living alone. Because [1:24] there are many types of apartments now [1:26] that are different from traditional ones [1:27] . For example, in the traditional [1:29] apartments we live in, you come home, [1:31] unlock your door, and you're in your own [1:33] home, with several families living in [1:35] one building, right? But what kind of [1:37] places do young people love to live in [1:39] now? It's a place where you walk in to a [1:42] large living room, with a shared kitchen [1:44] , a shared dining room, and maybe even a [1:46] ping-pong table; these are all shared, [1:48] while everyone still has their own [1:50] private bedroom to do as they please. [1:53] But in their daily life, they enjoy [1:55] hanging out in the living room or [1:57] cooking together in the kitchen. So, [1:59] would you call these people "living [2:01] alone"? They seem to be living alone, [2:03] but it's not the strict, traditional [2:04] sense of living alone. This lifestyle is [2:07] becoming popular now. Regarding what [2:09] Wendao said, I even have photos as proof [2:11] ; it's quite popular now. Among young [2:13] people, there's a youth apartment, it [2:15] seems to be in Guangzhou or somewhere, [2:17] do you see it? [2:18] >> This photo shows the communal area of [2:19] the youth apartment. [2:21] >> Originally, people just rented these [2:23] houses individually, but now some people [2:25] are specifically building these youth [2:27] apartments. The first floor has a lobby [2:29] , a shared kitchen, a place to read [2:31] newspapers, or even a gym, but everyone [2:34] lives in their own individual rooms. [2:36] It's actually a setup where, if you want [2:38] to socialize, you just go downstairs, [2:40] and you're bound to meet friends. [2:42] >> Is there any difference between that and [2:43] a college dorm? [2:45] University dorms have such good [2:47] conditions. [2:50] >> Over there, our setup is such that an [2:52] environment like this ground floor [2:53] already gives them a sense of community [2:55] . [2:58] >> Some tenants have even moved out. [3:01] >> They moved out, but because they’ve [3:02] become friends, they still come back [3:04] often to hang out. But for young people [3:06] , you could call this living alone, and [3:08] yet it's also a form of solitary living [3:09] . A female friend of mine born in the [3:11] 90s told me her ideal relationship [3:13] status is "having a boyfriend who lives [3:14] next door." Meaning, don't live together [3:16] , don't be too close. I can go back to [3:18] my own place, but it's not too far when [3:20] I want to visit you. It's not like I can [3:22] just walk out in my pajamas and slippers [3:24] , but... [3:25] >> Don't be together. It seems like [3:27] nowadays, I feel everyone is more and [3:29] more like—you can be an island, or you [3:31] can be connected. Everyone has such high [3:33] demands for their own personal space. [3:35] Even when they are together, it somehow [3:37] still feels like living alone. When I [3:39] look at young people today, seeing their [3:41] state, I feel like I'm getting old. [3:43] I often see young people, including [3:45] couples sitting together having [3:46] afternoon tea or coffee, all just [3:48] browsing the internet on their own. [3:50] >> Right? They’re all on their own devices [3:52] ; I’m living somewhere else entirely. [3:53] Yeah, are you guys actually together? [3:56] Or are you still doing your own thing? [3:59] >> Yes, it seems that a single person today [4:01] can already connect with everyone in the [4:03] world, not really needing others. [4:06] I remember when I first came to Hong [4:08] Kong, do you know the first Cantonese [4:10] phrase I learned? It was "ceng2 dou3 [4:12] gwai3 toi4 ceoi2," meaning "please go to [4:14] the counter to collect." I thought, " [4:15] Why would I have to do that?" [4:17] >> No, no, why was it that? It was because [4:21] when I came to Hong Kong, I was on my [4:23] own, and you could go to places like [4:24] Maxim’s or Café de Coral and order a [4:26] single-person meal. It had soup, rice, [4:29] and vegetables, and then they would call [4:30] out a number, and you’d hear, "Please go [4:32] to the counter to collect number [4:34] so-and-so." Because I came here about [4:36] ten years ago, I hadn't seen this kind [4:38] of single-person dining setup before. [4:40] It was only when I reached Hong Kong [4:42] that I realized, because of the level of [4:44] urbanization, it increasingly caters to [4:46] your needs as an individual. [4:48] The apartments are small, and everything [4:50] can be calculated in single portions. [4:52] >> Later on, I discovered that if you go to [4:54] Tokyo... [4:55] >> Tokyo is even more extreme. [4:56] >> Is it because at any hour, you can go [4:59] out and buy everything a single person [5:01] needs 24/7? [5:04] >> This raises a question for me; based on [5:06] what you’re saying, sociologists now [5:08] cite many conditions, like the rise in [5:11] women’s status, more women having their [5:13] own jobs, and cities providing services [5:16] for individuals, whether it's gyms or [5:18] restaurants. [5:21] These socialized services have created [5:23] the conditions for the rising population [5:25] of people living alone. [5:28] So, lurking beneath this is the question [5:30] : did these people originally even want [5:33] to live alone? [5:34] >> Probably not. Probably not. It’s like, [5:37] even if you wanted to in the past, the [5:38] conditions weren't there. Now that the [5:40] conditions exist, people get a dopamine [5:42] hit when they socialize, which makes [5:44] them happy, right? [5:45] >> For instance, in past agricultural [5:47] societies, it wasn't necessarily that [5:49] people were born wanting to live alone. [5:52] Agricultural societies required [5:53] collective production, so they naturally [5:55] tended away from living alone. [6:00] If we look back at modern society, we [6:02] can certainly name several benefits of [6:04] living alone, assuming you have the [6:06] ability to do so. [6:10] But the question is, what reason would [6:12] make us willing to give up living alone [6:14] and choose to live with someone else? [6:19] We also know that living together has [6:21] its downsides; you’ll argue, have [6:23] friction from seeing each other too much [6:25] , and so on. [6:28] But there is a situation that is [6:29] irreplaceable. [6:32] When we say "living together," we don't [6:34] mean just for two or three months or two [6:36] years. [6:39] It’s about building a relationship, a [6:41] sense of being a community. [6:46] To me, it means you feel willing and [6:47] hopeful to share a living space with [6:49] this person, that feeling of relying on [6:51] each other for survival. [6:56] I don’t think that feeling can be [6:58] replaced by 100 benefits of living alone [7:00] . [7:02] Of course, you don’t have to rely on [7:04] someone, but it’s a very unique feeling [7:06] . [7:09] I feel the same as you, but I’m starting [7:11] to reflect—are we a bit "out," a bit [7:13] old-fashioned? [7:15] I still think that if you truly go [7:17] through life alone, like, genuinely [7:19] alone without even a partner, I still [7:21] find it hard to imagine. [7:23] With what we call living alone, how much [7:25] loneliness can you really handle? [7:28] I’ll give you a test now, and you can [7:30] evaluate yourselves. There is an [7:32] international scale for this, and you’ll [7:33] realize that you might think you’re [7:35] qualified to love solitude, right? [7:36] Actually, there are some things you [7:38] might not necessarily be able to accept [7:39] . For example, look at this chart. [7:41] >> The International Scale of Loneliness. [7:42] Look at this. [7:43] >> Who came up with this? [7:44] >> Wen-dao, why don't you tell us? You have [7:47] no problem going to the supermarket [7:48] alone. [7:49] >> No problem. [7:50] >> Everyone is fine with going to a [7:51] restaurant alone, drinking coffee alone [7:53] , and I love watching movies alone. [7:54] >> Hmm. [7:55] >> What about eating hot pot alone? [7:56] >> Sure, they have those small ones now, [7:58] don't they? [7:59] >> I can do it. You don't need to count; [8:01] I'll tell you which ones I can't do up [8:03] to level ten. [8:04] Don't brag, because you don't even go to [8:06] karaoke. [8:08] >> I can handle up to level ten, but this [8:11] level six—going to karaoke alone—is a [8:13] problem. [8:16] >> Then I just won't sing? [8:19] >> Don't you know? [8:21] Geez. [8:22] >> This one can't be measured because I [8:23] don't even like karaoke in the first [8:25] place. Me going to book a room for [8:26] karaoke alone? That's the issue. Another [8:29] one: watching the ocean alone. Oh, I [8:31] love that, right? And then, going to an [8:34] amusement park alone. Oh boy. [8:35] >> I don't really go to amusement parks, [8:37] but the question is, what if you had to [8:39] ? [8:39] >> Forget amusement parks; let's swap it [8:41] for moving. That's great, practically [8:43] moving house all by yourself. [8:45] >> I can move. [8:45] >> I've done that way too many times. [8:47] >> Going for surgery alone. [8:48] >> That's pretty extreme, but I think it [8:50] might be doable. [8:51] >> Depends on the surgery, going alone. See [8:53] , he's got some reservations. [8:55] >> The first time going to an amusement [8:57] park alone, I had a...a psychological [8:59] shadow, I was 17. Anyway, back then, I [9:01] had just finished high school. We had a [9:03] family tradition: anyone who graduated [9:05] high school could go on a trip. The [9:07] family would give you money for the trip [9:08] , but my family didn't have money, and [9:10] no one would go with me. [9:12] Wait, I didn't quite catch that. What [9:14] kind of family tradition is that? Anyone [9:16] who graduates gets to travel, but [9:18] there's no money, so you still can't go [9:20] . What kind of situation is that? [9:22] >> I could go, but no one would accompany [9:24] me, so I just went alone. [9:28] Right, so my father had a friend who had [9:30] a ticket for a trip to the U.S., a cheap [9:32] one with a tour group, so my father [9:34] bought it for me to go. [9:39] Since no one would go with me, I went [9:41] alone, and one of the places we visited [9:43] was Disneyland in California. [9:47] >> Yes, playing there. What I remember most [9:49] is that everyone else in the tour group [9:51] was in groups of two, three, or four, [9:53] and I was the only one alone. [9:55] Then I'd ride the roller coasters and [9:57] everything else. [10:00] You scream in fear all by yourself, with [10:02] no one there, and then you play those [10:04] fun games, wanting to share how fun they [10:06] are with others, but there's no one [10:08] around—that feeling of being alone. [10:12] Ever since that time, I’ve vowed never [10:14] to go to an amusement park alone, and I [10:16] even avoid traveling solo as much as [10:18] possible. [10:19] >> But I don’t think your situation is [10:21] unique; that’s what you call loneliness [10:23] within a crowd. [10:24] >> Hmm. [10:24] >> You were in a tour group. [10:26] In that tour group, people were with [10:28] their families and friends, huddled [10:30] together, and there you were all alone. [10:33] But the amusement park loneliness, [10:34] especially…let me tell you, because I'm [10:37] often forced to go to amusement parks [10:39] now—I don't even want to go—taking the [10:41] kids to Disney or Ocean Park, I’m [10:43] already sick of it. [10:44] I often see a phenomenon while waiting [10:46] in line: there are often women, just [10:48] girls, who are there alone. [10:50] >> You can clearly tell she came by herself [10:52] . Oh my, how did you know what I was [10:53] about to say? [10:54] >> So you’ve seen it? [10:57] >> It’s not just that I’ve seen it; I think [10:59] whether you're with family or a group, [11:02] there’s a certain human nature—some [11:04] people simply enjoy being like a lone [11:06] swan, wandering in solitary grace. [11:11] I remember years ago, I knew a girl from [11:13] Taiwan who was very artsy. [11:16] She was quiet, hardly ever spoke, and [11:18] was always carrying a sketchbook. [11:21] Hmm. [11:22] >> She’d draw whatever she saw. I sat next [11:24] to her, and she didn’t really say much, [11:27] you know? She’d just draw. [11:28] >> People always found a reason not to talk [11:30] to her. [11:30] >> Exactly. I was right across from her, [11:33] and she’d just draw. No matter what I [11:34] said, she’d just smile and keep drawing [11:36] . "That girl is very interesting." Later [11:39] , I don't know where she went; I rarely [11:41] saw her, and I rarely heard her speak. [11:44] And she had this habit of going to [11:45] amusement parks alone. [11:48] But hearing you describe it like this, I [11:50] feel like I’m about to tear up, you know [11:52] ? [11:53] She said she loved going during the [11:55] off-season, to those empty amusement [11:57] parks. [11:59] Can you imagine that? Based on my [12:00] description of this girl, she’s walking [12:02] through an amusement park all by herself [12:04] , looking at the carousel. [12:06] >> They especially love riding the carousel [12:08] . [12:08] >> Ah, she rides the carousel. [12:10] >> Then she just goes, quietly playing [12:12] through every single one of them. [12:13] >> Playing. [12:14] >> I don't know, for someone like me, I [12:17] might wonder if you actually enjoy being [12:19] sad or melancholic. [12:21] That's what I’d think, but it might not [12:23] be the case—you just don't know what's [12:25] in that girl's heart. [12:27] Still don't know. [12:28] >> I don't know, I don't know, I just... [12:30] >> Some people truly like it that way, and [12:32] why is that? Listening to you, maybe she [12:35] feels she wants to do something in her [12:37] creative work in the future. Some people [12:39] specifically like visiting dilapidated [12:40] amusement parks, treating it like [12:42] they're documenting things. The issue is [12:44] , I think the situation you’re [12:45] describing isn't quite like those " [12:47] Taiwanese literary girls"; many girls [12:49] traveling solo nowadays aren't lonely at [12:51] all. Why? Because they’re constantly [12:53] checking in, always online, always [12:55] telling everyone, "Hey everyone, today I [12:57] ..."—she might even be an influencer! " [12:59] I’m at Disney today for this new ride, I [13:01] just tried it, let me report back to you [13:04] guys how it is, right?""Look, this is [13:06] the photo I just took." [13:07] >> Busy as can be. [13:08] >> Their social media circle is their stage [13:10] . [13:10] >> Exactly. Right, you know what? Actually [13:13] , about that girl you mentioned who [13:14] keeps drawing along the way, people who [13:16] travel alone always have a non-human [13:18] companion. What does that mean? [13:20] It means her painting is her companion. [13:23] I’ve experienced this myself; when I [13:25] used to be free to travel alone, my [13:27] companion was a camera. [13:29] I didn't feel lonely at all, you just [13:31] play with yourself. [13:34] And rumors say you hooked your husband [13:36] while traveling solo, didn't you? [13:39] Wasn't it on a... [13:41] >> Airplane? Rumors say on a plane, I have [13:43] a different version. [13:45] >> Was it in first class next to each other [13:47] ? No, no, absolutely not. [13:50] >> It seems, was it or wasn't it on a plane [13:52] ? [13:54] >> We did meet on a plane, but that was [13:56] definitely not me traveling alone. [13:57] >> He was just sitting there, he was [13:58] sitting right next to you. [13:59] >> Yes, yes, that was for work. So how did [14:02] you two start talking? [14:03] >> We suddenly realized we were watching [14:05] the same show—wait, no, it wasn't a [14:07] movie, we were watching the same show. [14:09] Later, after waking up, I asked him— [14:11] wait, he had fallen asleep. [14:13] >> Well, it was already late at night when [14:15] we boarded, so I asked him what the [14:17] ending of that show was. [14:18] >> It seems...I don't even remember, oh, we [14:20] have different versions. [14:21] >> I thought you only started talking after [14:23] waking up. [14:23] >> But this feeling is really interesting, [14:25] it's that you could have never imagined [14:27] at the time that he would end up being [14:29] your husband. [14:30] Yeah, exactly. [14:31] >> Destiny. [14:32] >> It’s destiny. But this is awful, next [14:34] time I fly and see what movie the person [14:36] next to me is watching, I’ll quickly [14:38] pick the same one to see how it ends. [14:41] >> I remember there might also be a chance [14:43] he has a newspaper and is reading [14:44] horoscopes, and I ask him what his sign [14:46] is. [14:47] >> You're too heartless, not remembering [14:49] the process at all. [14:52] Do you know what’s even more magical? [14:56] It’s on the plane, it’s, how should I [14:57] put it? [14:59] Meeting your future father-in-law on the [15:01] plane. [15:02] >> Hmm. [15:04] >> Oh, for the woman, it’s not her [15:06] father-in-law, it’s the woman’s what? [15:08] Father-in-law. [15:09] >> It’s not called father-in-law. [15:10] >> How do you call it then? [15:11] >> So this beauty, she’s on a flight, and [15:13] sitting next to her is this older [15:15] gentleman. [15:18] >> She chats with this older gentleman, and [15:20] later, the gentleman basically tries to [15:22] sell his own son to her. [15:26] >> And in the end, it was a success, so she [15:28] encountered her father-in-law on the [15:30] plane first. [15:31] >> This kind of family issue wouldn't be a [15:33] problem anymore. [15:34] >> Getting along with the father-in-law, [15:35] yes, you see she gets along great with [15:37] him. [15:38] >> But I don't think it's as romantic as [15:40] that, bonding after watching the same [15:42] movie and waking up. [15:46] But don't forget, all these scenarios [15:48] you mentioned assume the person [15:49] traveling alone is a young woman, right [15:51] ? [15:54] Carrying an easel, holding a camera, [15:56] this and that...well, life goes on. [16:00] At 17, 23, 25, 28, you might enjoy, [16:03] really enjoy traveling and eating alone [16:06] with your easel. [16:09] But as you go on, at 38, 48, can you [16:11] imagine a middle-aged lady sitting in an [16:13] amusement park, on a carousel horse, [16:16] holding a cob of corn? [16:18] Is that very romantic? Isn't she [16:20] miserable? [16:22] >> Are you talking about me? [16:24] >> And then an older guy. [16:25] >> Freedom doesn't age; the older you get, [16:27] the more precious freedom becomes. [16:29] >> You're still young. I remember, of [16:31] course, because life goes on, and [16:33] different stages have different needs, [16:35] psychological needs and physical needs. [16:37] I remember, when I was a bit younger, in [16:40] my 30s, I was once in Causeway Bay alone [16:42] . My wife wasn't there, and I went for [16:44] dinner by myself. [16:46] I walked past a place—one of those [16:48] Cantonese clay pot rice shops. I sat [16:50] down; I love snake soup, and Cantonese [16:53] folks usually pair a snake soup with [16:55] clay pot rice. [16:56] Suddenly, a man came over and sat down— [16:58] to me at the time, he looked like an old [17:01] guy, though I'm probably older than him [17:03] now. [17:04] He was in his 50s, sitting there alone, [17:06] ordering a bowl of barbecue pork rice. [17:09] >> Just a side of greens, eating all by [17:11] himself, looking so lonely. I felt so [17:13] sad at that moment. [17:15] I swore to myself that when I got old, I [17:17] would never end up like that. [17:19] >> My approach is the complete opposite of [17:20] yours. [17:21] >> I am the complete opposite of you. [17:22] >> Don't I love to eat? Some people call me [17:24] a gourmet or whatever, but actually, not [17:27] really. I am, but I dare say, if I am a [17:29] gourmet, I am a "solitary gourmet." My [17:32] journey to becoming a gourmet was forged [17:34] by eating alone. [17:35] You know, when I was just starting [17:37] graduate school and working as a [17:39] teaching assistant at the university, I [17:41] spent almost my entire salary on food. [17:44] >> I really loved eating alone. [17:46] >> And I didn't mind spending money, but [17:47] it's really inconvenient to eat Chinese [17:49] food by yourself. [17:50] >> Exactly. [17:51] >> That's why I'm more familiar with [17:52] Western cuisine. No. [17:54] >> So you know, they're adapting to this [17:55] need now. It started abroad, and now [17:57] it's in China too—it's called a " [17:58] restaurant for one." [17:59] >> It's just for one person. [18:00] >> It's just for people like us. Back then [18:02] in Hong Kong, I basically ate my way [18:04] through every ordinary Japanese [18:06] restaurant. All the money I earned from [18:08] my part-time job went to food or books. [18:11] I'd rather walk home for over an hour [18:12] just to have a good meal. [18:14] >> I ate everywhere, and I did it so often [18:17] that the restaurants started to [18:18] recognize me. At first, they treated me [18:21] exceptionally well, thinking I might be [18:23] some kind of secret food critic. I [18:25] discovered back then that there’s a [18:27] secret to getting restaurants to treat [18:29] you well—though it might not work now— [18:31] when eating alone back in those days. [18:33] While eating, just take out a notebook [18:35] and jot something down. I guarantee the [18:37] restaurant will bring out all their best [18:39] dishes. [18:40] >> They thought I was one of those Michelin [18:41] inspectors. Just like that. Later on, I [18:43] realized that sometimes when I really [18:45] wanted Chinese food, it wasn't [18:47] convenient, but there was one place that [18:49] could solve this need: Temple Street. [18:51] There are a few stalls in Temple Street [18:53] that use large shared round tables. Then [18:55] ordering side dishes, I remember it so [18:57] well, that was over 20, 30 years ago, a [19:00] side dish was just a few Hong Kong [19:01] dollars. A real loach, they didn't have [19:04] much real fish, real fish was too [19:06] expensive, right? That loach was just 10 [19:08] dollars or so, and there were a dozen [19:10] people sharing tables. Yeah. [19:12] >> Except for me being a young person, they [19:14] were all those types of lonely old men [19:16] you mentioned. [19:17] But I feel that everyone, well, we Hong [19:20] Kong people don't drink Erguotou, we [19:22] order this—what is it—shochu... [19:26] >> Double-steamed. [19:28] >> Placed on the table, and as we kept [19:29] drinking, everyone would open up and [19:31] start chatting. [19:33] Back then, I also liked going to a [19:35] bookstore in Mong Kok; after reading, [19:37] I'd go downstairs to eat beef noodles [19:38] alone, order some beef tripe, and have a [19:41] bottle of double-steamed liquor. [19:43] I was like that, in my teens I was [19:45] already eating and drinking like those [19:47] lonely old men, and everyone knew each [19:48] other. I didn't think they were [19:50] miserable at all; I thought everyone was [19:52] very happy. [19:54] >> I once had a boy confess to me, saying [19:56] he wouldn't let me eat alone anymore, [19:58] and I thought, "Hey, I actually like [19:59] eating alone." [20:01] >> Total mismatch. I didn't expect to be [20:04] facing such a "socially extinct" [20:06] situation. [20:07] >> My freedom, that feeling you're talking [20:09] about, I think I can really understand [20:11] it, but it seems Chinese food portions [20:13] are particularly large, so it's [20:14] definitely hard to order when you're [20:16] alone. [20:17] >> That's why I go to those places, because [20:19] for those places, why are they full of [20:21] these lonely old men? What kind of place [20:23] do you think Temple Street is? Have you [20:25] never thought about those commoner [20:27] districts, they have those so-called " [20:29] commoner nightclubs," have you never [20:30] been to such places? Some doorways on [20:32] Temple Street, for example, you hear [20:34] loud music, and inside there's someone [20:36] singing or whatever; you push the door [20:38] open and see, it's all single men, [20:39] uncles and seniors just singing there, [20:41] or listening to the lady sing—that lady [20:43] is also a middle-aged auntie now, having [20:46] sung from a young lady to an auntie—and [20:48] then applauding and such, that kind of [20:50] vibe. The whole street is for single men [20:51] ; well, not necessarily single, they [20:53] might have wives at home, but they're [20:55] alone. [20:55] >> Right, they come out alone to hang out. [20:58] >> Operating solo. [21:00] >> Exactly, so it's that impulse to seek [21:02] personal freedom; it's what you call [21:04] enjoying solitude. [21:06] >> Mm-hmm. [21:07] >> The book's conclusion is that brilliant [21:10] minds, right, often have a preference [21:12] for solitude; for them, solitude is [21:14] practically a necessity of life. [21:17] I could actually find an example for [21:19] that, which is Einstein. [21:22] >> Uh-huh, you look at Einstein, his wife [21:24] also complained about him. [21:26] But you have to accept one of Einstein's [21:29] quirks, or rather a habit: he would [21:31] disappear for a few days. [21:34] Even when he was at home, he needed [21:36] family life, he could lead a normal [21:38] family life, but he would—you had to [21:41] adapt to him—he had to, first of all, [21:43] spend a long time every day in a room by [21:45] himself thinking, and sometimes he would [21:48] go out for a week to Switzerland or [21:50] somewhere, all alone, rowing a little [21:52] boat, likely contemplating these physics [21:55] problems one after another. [22:00] Even his wife said, even though they had [22:02] a good relationship as a couple, she [22:04] felt that Einstein, while he had this [22:06] mortal life, this part of our married [22:09] life, she also always felt there was a [22:11] part of him that was, I think, perhaps [22:13] what Schopenhauer described. [22:16] If you make a person like that engage in [22:18] this, this, this so-called ordinary [22:20] social life every day, then for him, [22:22] sometimes for his, for his spir…it… [22:24] >> It is a kind of damage. [22:26] >> Whether it's ordinary or not is one [22:28] consideration, but what's the other? [22:30] Happiness. [22:31] Do you want that kind of happiness? [22:34] Sometimes happiness can be damaging to [22:36] you. [22:36] For example, you've met Pamuk, right? [22:41] >> At that time he was with his ex-wife, [22:43] because he's divorced, when they were [22:45] boyfriend and girlfriend—not sure if [22:46] they were married yet—while she was [22:48] getting her PhD in the US, what did he [22:50] say later? [22:55] Living together as if they were a [22:57] married couple, he said it was almost [22:59] the most painful period in his life, his [23:01] creative life. [23:03] Why? It wasn't because he was unhappy, [23:05] it was because he was too happy. [23:07] >> Too much happiness. [23:08] >> When you're too happy, you can't write [23:10] anything. Yes, that's how he described [23:12] it. [23:13] He said this happy life of love and [23:15] marriage completely hindered his [23:16] creative inspiration. [23:19] So how did he eventually cope with it? [23:22] It was near his home, that...that... [23:24] well, that was later, he didn't have [23:26] money to find a writing studio, so what [23:28] did he do? [23:30] Every morning. [23:31] >> He would still get dressed and go out, [23:33] and what for? To walk, walk, walk, walk [23:36] , walk for 15 minutes, and then turn [23:38] back and walk back, he...he felt that [23:40] way his life and his writing weren't in [23:43] the same space. [23:44] Actually, it was the same space, but [23:46] after walking for half an hour like that [23:48] , he would console and hypnotize himself [23:50] . [23:50] >> As if the environment had changed. The [23:52] environment has changed, it seems the [23:54] environment has changed. It feels like [23:56] going to an office or a studio to write [23:58] , so sometimes it's too blissful, but I [24:00] have a question: he’s a writer, he has a [24:02] platform to express his feelings, but [24:04] does his wife have a platform to express [24:06] hers? [24:07] >> I didn't notice his platform. Because, [24:08] right, just like Virginia Woolf said [24:10] many years ago, a woman must have a room [24:12] of her own, right? Just a room of your [24:14] own. [24:15] Sometimes I think there's a question [24:17] that still puzzles me to this day: can [24:18] you actually distinguish between [24:20] loneliness and freedom? [24:22] >> Sometimes you feel like you want someone [24:24] to keep you company, and you think what [24:26] you're losing, what you want to get rid [24:27] of, is loneliness, but what you end up [24:29] losing is freedom. In fact, they go hand [24:31] in hand. [24:33] I...I’ll boldly reveal a scandal to you [24:35] all—it's not mine. [24:38] >> Maybe not a scandal, but I’m providing a [24:41] specimen that you can help me analyze. [24:44] I know the words "solitude" and " [24:46] loneliness." But believe it or not, I [24:48] don't have those feelings? [24:50] >> Hmm. [24:51] >> Maybe I'm sick. [24:53] Or maybe it's because I'm empty inside. [24:55] So, I always keep myself occupied. [24:58] My mom would ask, "What are you doing at [25:00] home?" [25:02] I say I'm busy, I'm incredibly busy. [25:05] I can go two weeks without going [25:07] downstairs, but I’m not empty; I don't [25:09] feel lonely at all. My daily routine, [25:11] look, it's very tedious every day. You [25:13] wake up in the morning and have to eat [25:15] breakfast, right? And then, while eating [25:17] breakfast, you have to look at this, [25:19] read that book, and there are so many [25:20] episodes of British, American, and [25:22] Chinese dramas saved up that I can't [25:24] finish, plus I have to prepare for* [25:26] Round Table Party*, and I must spend an [25:28] hour on the treadmill every day—this, [25:30] you know? I really... [25:31] >> Right, and I have to shower too. That's [25:33] right, and I have to... [25:35] >> I have to breathe, and this leads to the [25:37] issue of living alone. [25:39] What kind of problem does living alone [25:41] have? [25:42] Let me tell you, it's interesting—I [25:44] could go a month without seeing anyone. [25:47] But what happens when you don't see [25:49] people? For example, if I go to a good [25:51] friend's place next door, they say, " [25:54] Come, come," and there are a few friends [25:56] there. When I go out, I get this feeling [25:58] of blushing and a racing heart, you know [26:01] ? [26:01] Even though it's just going to a [26:03] friend's place nearby, because I haven't [26:05] been out for so long and I’m thinking, [26:07] are there other friends there too? [26:09] I’m going to see people, you know? I get [26:11] a little bit excited. That is just...I [26:13] ... [26:14] >> It's been so long since I've been around [26:15] the scent of people. So, Wentao, what [26:16] kind of condition would you say I have? [26:18] >> That wouldn't be called a condition, [26:19] would it? [26:20] >> But you... [26:20] >> I mean, look around, so many people are [26:23] talking about being lonely or solitary, [26:25] it seems like... [26:27] >> The loneliness we're talking about isn't [26:29] just someone feeling bored, having [26:31] nothing to do, or lacking companionship [26:33] . [26:34] Sometimes, what is this sense of [26:36] loneliness? It's a clear realization [26:38] that one is a singular entity. What does [26:41] that mean? For example, the first time I [26:43] experienced loneliness as a child was [26:45] precisely not because I was alone, but [26:47] because I was in a crowd. [26:49] >> I was riding my bike back to school one [26:51] day after a break. [26:53] As I saw many bikes and people passing [26:55] by, including some classmates, suddenly [26:57] my consciousness seemed to leave my body [26:59] , and I could see myself from the back [27:01] of my head. [27:03] >> I realized I actually had nothing in [27:05] common with these people; I was just one [27:07] person. You see, I saw myself; that was [27:10] the moment I first realized... [27:13] >> Many urban youth share this. [27:16] Now that you mention it, I recall their [27:18] definition: "Why do I always feel lonely [27:20] ?" [27:21] Loneliness is this: everyone around is [27:23] human, even acquaintances, classmates, [27:26] or friends, yet I still feel very lonely [27:29] ; I still feel like I am all by myself. [27:31] That’s one definition of loneliness and [27:34] solitude. [27:35] Like that Tagore poem, what does it say [27:37] ? How does it go? [27:39] Walking on the street, it talks about a [27:41] sea of people, but no one is loving. [27:44] >> No what? No, no one is loving. [27:46] >> Just that the street is full of people, [27:47] that kind of feeling, but no one is [27:49] loving, that’s how he put it. [27:50] >> That’s a universal feeling, isn't it? As [27:52] the old Chinese saying goes? [27:54] Acquaintances all over the world. But [27:55] not one who truly knows you. Yes, [27:58] everyone faces this situation. [28:00] >> But the point is, I don't see it as [28:02] feeling like no one understands you. [28:05] It's not about lacking a confidant; it's [28:07] simply realizing that you are an [28:08] individual. [28:09] Yes, actually, you two have become very [28:12] abstract. [28:13] In reality, many young people live alone [28:15] today because they’ve left their [28:17] hometowns, aren't living with their [28:19] families, whether they are "drifters" in [28:21] Beijing or elsewhere. [28:23] >> They actually have no one, there's no [28:24] one around them. [28:25] >> You’re great; you’ve brought the topic [28:27] back. I was going to say, those are the [28:29] extreme few, we don’t need to worry [28:31] about the extreme few, right? [28:32] >> Yes, yes, never mind, let them be lonely [28:35] . I’m asking, what about the majority of [28:37] other people? That is to say, it is [28:39] actually a change in modern modes of [28:41] production. [28:43] For instance, since the development of [28:45] capitalist production, people have [28:47] become atomized and individualized. [28:51] Moreover, there is an increasing demand [28:53] for the quality of one's own life [28:55] between people. [28:57] Take a lady I know, for example. [29:00] >> Due to objective reasons, she and her [29:01] husband have been living apart. [29:04] >> After living apart for a long time, she [29:06] told me that for people like us in our [29:08] thirties and forties, while we initially [29:10] wanted to be together, we later realized [29:13] we didn't want that anymore. [29:16] >> She said this was fine, and told me, you [29:18] know, it’s actually very easy for him to [29:21] fly over now. [29:23] >> But she said that having him come back [29:25] for a week every month actually feels [29:27] like a hassle to me, because do you know [29:29] why? [29:30] I’m used to my toothbrush being right [29:32] here; I’m used to wearing my pajamas or [29:34] whatever messy clothes to the kitchen to [29:36] fix something for myself, or if I don't [29:38] feel like eating breakfast today, I just [29:41] won't. [29:42] >> Right? She said, when your husband is [29:45] actually here, I find it very awkward [29:46] and troublesome; I even start thinking, [29:49] "When are you leaving?" [29:51] >> I have a friend who has long been a " [29:52] spaceman"—someone who lives apart from [29:54] their family. [29:56] >> He works hard in Beijing by himself. [30:00] While his whole family lives abroad. [30:02] After living like that for a long time, [30:04] his family, including his wife, said, " [30:07] Oh, we’ve been separated for almost 20 [30:09] years."" [30:10] >> This isn't good; we should probably just [30:12] live together." So they moved back to [30:14] Beijing to live together, but not long [30:16] after, friction started to arise. [30:18] And there were often little arguments. [30:21] Do you know how they resolved their [30:23] disputes? [30:24] >> They were separated for many years, but [30:26] they developed a habit of calling each [30:28] other every day. [30:29] They would talk on the phone every day, [30:31] making long-distance calls for 20 years [30:33] , sometimes chatting for quite a long [30:34] time and enjoying it. They invested in [30:36] their relationship that way—a half-hour [30:38] call every day kept them happy and [30:39] satisfied. [30:41] So, after they started living together, [30:43] whenever they had a conflict, they would [30:45] talk it out on the phone; each would go [30:47] to a different room, and to this day, [30:49] they still maintain the habit of calling [30:51] each other while at home. [30:54] In two separate rooms, right? [30:56] >> Yes, that’s a real case study. [30:59] >> You just stay there like that. [31:00] >> No, it’s like at night when you say... [31:02] >> Roughly like that. [31:04] Do you mean to say you use those [31:06] messaging apps to talk? [31:09] Let's meet for a movie, meet in the [31:10] living room. [31:12] The living room layout is fine, so we'll [31:14] meet in the parlor later, right? [31:17] Okay, I'll call them in three minutes. [31:21] >> Sounds like you're living the life of Li [31:23] Ka-shing, needing to prep a carriage. [31:26] >> I'll have Feiyong prepare some coffee, [31:28] then we'll meet in the living room. It's [31:30] not like what you said; it's unique, of [31:32] course, having been apart for 20 years. [31:35] Frankly, people change, so let's check [31:37] in with the young people of today. [31:40] I ask many young people and students, [31:42] and I hear a lot of them say, "When I [31:44] find a boyfriend, girlfriend, or spouse [31:46] , it's best not to live together [31:48] constantly. [31:50] Being able to live alone, just like we [31:53] said, living nearby, is ideal." [31:56] That's like in those Woody Allen films, [31:58] or what he was doing decades ago in [32:00] Manhattan. [32:02] He had the money for it. [32:04] So, it's a choice, and that choice is [32:06] becoming more common. [32:09] I think there’s a very important reason [32:11] for this, right? [32:12] You're unwilling to sacrifice, unwilling [32:14] to compromise. [32:16] Like I said, there are ten pros and ten [32:18] cons to living alone, and ten pros and [32:20] ten cons to living together. [32:24] That sense of shared survival or looking [32:26] out for one another, even just sharing a [32:28] space, is important. [32:32] It's like why we pay for tickets to a [32:33] concert. [32:35] You could actually watch the performance [32:37] at home, right? [32:41] But we want to exist in the same space [32:42] and at the same time as our idols. [32:49] When we talk about love, it's the same; [32:51] I want to be in the same space as this [32:53] person, doing something together—eating [32:56] , watching a movie. [33:00] But you have to sacrifice and compromise [33:02] . [33:03] Do you brush your teeth first, or do I? [33:06] Who does the dishes? [33:08] People in their twenties today basically [33:10] don't want to sacrifice; to them, [33:12] sacrifice feels like a grievance. [33:14] >> Right. [33:14] >> It’s not even just compromise anymore; [33:16] it’s a grievance. Look at what you’re [33:18] saying, Yijun. I’m from the 60s, you’re [33:20] from the 90s, and I can really feel that [33:22] difference myself. Of course, we want [33:25] women to have more self-awareness. [33:28] Who says women should always be [33:29] submissive to men? [33:31] I’m the first to disagree, right? Let’s [33:34] make sure we clarify that ideal first, [33:36] right? [33:36] >> Next, you're going to say something [33:38] difficult, I know. [33:40] I, I’m not, but I have truly noticed it [33:42] . Take our generation born in the 60s, [33:45] for example. Back in college, the way [33:47] classmates dated—once they started a [33:49] relationship, a girl would run over to [33:51] our male dormitory, chirping away, [33:53] clearly head over heels for her [33:55] boyfriend. She’d just start doing her [33:57] boyfriend’s laundry, or even for the [33:59] other guys in his dorm, it was just... [34:01] back then, it felt like... [34:03] >> You were acting like a maid? [34:06] >> She wasn't a maid, but girls in our era [34:08] just felt, "Oh, you men don't know how [34:10] to live properly," and that girls knew [34:12] how to manage life and keep things clean [34:14] . [34:15] >> This guy had...regardless of what it was [34:18] , it was, it was just that kind of [34:20] environment. [34:21] I criticize that kind of environment; I [34:23] don't advocate for it. [34:25] I really don't. [34:27] But honestly, I feel now, some people [34:29] tell me a different story—they ask, [34:31] who’s supposed to take care of whom [34:33] nowadays? [34:35] Everyone is someone’s son or daughter, [34:37] everyone is their parents 'precious baby [34:39] , you know? [34:42] The issue now is that some—like with [34:44] overseas students, or those born in the [34:46] 90s or 00 s—have you ever seen some of [34:49] these girls' bedrooms? [34:52] >> Oh, I saw one recently, I can understand [34:55] . [34:55] >> You know what I mean? It’s like a [34:57] disaster zone. [34:58] >> So, you know, the boys now are changing [35:00] too; nobody thinks it’s naturally [35:02] expected that one person should take [35:04] care of the other’s life, or even that a [35:06] man should take care of a woman’s life. [35:09] >> This is a thing for the single [35:11] generation, right. [35:13] >> I was recently at a girl's place, I [35:15] stayed there for one night, and she was [35:17] talking to me about her breakup, and I [35:18] was thinking, looking at the state of [35:20] this place...I’m afraid you’re going to [35:22] stay heartbroken. [35:24] >> That’s why I just wanted to leave. [35:26] >> So, you see, it really is more equal now [35:28] . Equality—and you find that after [35:31] equality comes independence. [35:33] >> Or just this sense of independence. Let [35:35] me show you a figure: just look at the [35:37] last ten years, and you’ll realize it’s [35:39] a global trend—the population of people [35:41] living alone has increased by 33%. [35:43] Actually, China is still relatively [35:46] traditional; our rate is at 14%. But [35:48] what I want to say is, I think it's [35:50] interesting why this is happening in [35:52] places like China and India, you see— [35:54] it's in developing countries where the [35:56] middle-class population has suddenly [35:58] surged. [35:58] >> Exactly, and there’s also the [36:00] significant urban-rural gap, isn't there [36:02] ? [36:03] >> So this mobility has become very intense [36:05] . [36:07] I think we need to understand the [36:09] phenomenon of living alone that we see [36:11] now—it’s not necessarily that someone [36:13] says "I plan to live alone from now on, [36:15] " but rather an unavoidable reality at [36:17] this moment. [36:20] Like Yijun just said, if you come from a [36:22] rural area, a county seat, or a smaller [36:25] third-tier city to Beijing, Shanghai, or [36:27] Guangzhou to study and work, how can you [36:29] not live alone? [36:31] So why are youth apartments and [36:33] co-living arrangements becoming popular [36:35] now? [36:35] That’s because the cost of living alone [36:38] is still very high; renting an apartment [36:40] in Beijing, Shanghai, or Guangzhou is [36:42] expensive, so young people team up to [36:44] rent—that's how it happens. His existing [36:46] interpersonal connections are basically [36:48] all cut off. He has to face a new set of [36:50] relationships, and he's a bit cautious. [36:52] He can’t just arrive and immediately get [36:54] married and buy a house, that's [36:56] impossible. I was talking to an [36:57] economist recently, and he showed me [36:59] some data. China is indeed the country [37:01] with the largest scale of population [37:03] movement in the world over the past 20 [37:05] years, and the highest level of [37:06] urbanization due to this mobile [37:08] population. [37:09] He mentioned that there are actually [37:10] differences between the north and the [37:12] south in China. What did he say? He said [37:14] that in the south, like in the Shanghai [37:16] and Zhejiang areas, the situation is [37:18] actually okay. For example, if you come [37:20] from another province—what you might [37:22] call a "drifter"—because Shanghai and [37:24] the coastal areas have central cities [37:26] and first-tier cities that are gradually [37:28] developing into what we call urban [37:30] clusters. [37:31] They are expanding, and surrounding [37:32] satellite cities are emerging, like the [37:34] Yangtze River Delta. Furthermore, the [37:36] gap between these urban clusters and [37:38] their core areas is actually shrinking, [37:40] especially now with modern logistics. [37:42] Many people say they don't necessarily [37:44] need to be in the center because they [37:45] can order anything online; the disparity [37:47] is small. [37:48] >> Many people leave their hometowns and [37:50] come to these big cities, living in the [37:52] bustling metropolis, but let me tell you [37:54] , there are both "small and beautiful" [37:56] and "small and shabby" areas. No, really [37:58] , I think you...look, I should just show [38:01] you some photos. There’s a girl who [38:03] rented a place that’s 30 square meters, [38:05] over 30 square meters, look. [38:07] >> This big. [38:07] >> When she first arrived, it was a total [38:09] mess, it was quite...Then look down here [38:12] , hey, the walls are all peeling like [38:14] this. [38:16] But look, he sat down and spent about a [38:18] month painting the peeling walls himself [38:20] . [38:23] It just goes to show that even in a tiny [38:25] space, you can still live a flavorful [38:27] life, and you can even whip up a little [38:29] something for yourself in the small [38:31] kitchen. Look, not bad. [38:33] >> A few simple dishes. [38:36] >> It can be done in a small room of 30 [38:37] square meters, it’s possible. [38:41] 30 square meters is actually quite [38:43] spacious, it's plenty for what he's [38:44] doing now. [38:47] When you have 30 square meters, of [38:49] course, as a woman, the first thing is " [38:51] exquisite" living—that’s the most [38:53] important thing, regardless of whether [38:55] you’re rich or not. [39:00] The point is that 30 square meters is [39:02] enough, and it gives me the motivation [39:04] to fix it up and live a happier life. [39:09] But when you’re living in eight square [39:11] meters, how can you talk to me about " [39:13] exquisite" living? [39:14] How could I possibly decorate? In my [39:16] eight-square-meter room, I did [39:18] everything there—eating, sleeping, [39:20] everything. I practically had to sleep [39:22] standing up—like a coffin home or a [39:24] fridge box. [39:25] >> I’ve lived in seven square meters. [39:27] >> In Hong Kong? [39:28] >> In Guangzhou. [39:29] >> When I first came to Hong Kong, the [39:30] first agent took me to see apartments, [39:32] and they were also terrible places. He [39:34] said, "Don't worry, Liu Jialin. You know [39:36] , when I first arrived in Hong Kong, the [39:39] company rented a place over 40 square [39:41] meters, a two-bedroom apartment. I lived [39:43] with the famous Chinese music producer [39:46] Huang Xiao...Mao." [39:49] >> With Xiao Mao, we both...you know, the [39:51] room we lived in was a themed room. [39:56] >> The carpet was purple. [39:59] The walls were also purple. [40:02] We lived in a purple room—you know, two [40:05] grown men. [40:07] >> When our friends came over, they all [40:08] thought it was very strange. [40:10] >> It was so small, and it felt so awkward [40:12] . You'd want to make a phone call, right [40:15] ? [40:15] He would always complain, "Who are you [40:17] talking to on the phone? You talk for [40:19] hours and hours, I can't even get in [40:21] touch with my family because the line is [40:23] always busy, right?" And so on. In the [40:26] end, that's how it was. See, after [40:27] living together for a year, we both [40:29] moved out. We swore we couldn't do it [40:31] anymore; it was hard to adapt to living [40:32] together, and we had to live alone. [40:35] Because this situation is very common in [40:37] Hong Kong, people there have developed [40:39] to be very flexible and considerate. [40:43] For example, if you have a daughter [40:45] living with her siblings, and she starts [40:47] dating a boyfriend, everyone pretty much [40:49] knows. [40:51] While eating, my daughter said, "Oh, by [40:54] the way, my boyfriend is coming over [40:56] tonight at 8:30." [40:57] Everyone looked at each other—we all [40:59] knew what that meant. [41:01] Since the boyfriend was coming at 8:30, [41:03] Mom, Dad, and the siblings all found [41:05] excuses to leave by 8:25. My younger [41:07] sister said, "I'm going to karaoke." My [41:09] younger brother said, "I'm going to play [41:11] soccer." My dad said, "I'm going [41:13] downstairs to watch the ladies dancing [41:14] in the square." That "lady" was actually [41:17] his wife; he was just going to watch her [41:19] . [41:22] I’ve realized one very practical thing: [41:24] you know, as I mentioned, sometimes I’ve [41:27] had these scares—maybe not heart attacks [41:29] , but cardiac neurosis, right? [41:33] Well, it’s just pure panic, and I [41:35] realized that living alone creates this [41:37] objective problem. [41:39] >> You know, in Beijing, there were times [41:41] when I was so terrified that I’d drink [41:43] baijiu, and my heart rate would hit over [41:46] 100 beats per minute. [41:48] Drinking alcohol actually does that, you [41:50] know? But sometimes you can't tell the [41:52] difference. [41:52] >> You can't tell if it's the alcohol or if [41:54] you're having an episode, and by the [41:56] second half of the night, you can't [41:58] sleep—the first half is the alcohol, the [42:01] second half is the fear. Oh my god, I’d [42:03] just clutch my phone. Staring at it, [42:05] ready to call for an ambulance. [42:08] At those moments, I’d think, "Is this it [42:10] ? Am I going to go just like that?" Who [42:13] would even know? Who would call for help [42:14] for you? [42:15] >> Who would deal with the remains? Do you [42:17] really...do you remember? Eileen Chang, [42:19] she was dead for, what, two weeks? [42:21] >> Before she was found. [42:22] >> Found by someone. In Hong Kong, they [42:24] have those emergency buttons for the [42:26] elderly, right? Like a "life alarm." [42:29] In some countries, they have watches you [42:31] can press if you fall. [42:33] >> That’s a service that should really be [42:34] considered for people living alone. [42:36] >> I’ve seen it, it’s true. I had a teacher [42:39] , an Englishman, who was...honestly, he [42:41] was the only person I’ve ever met who [42:43] could truly live a lonely life. [42:46] I always tried to understand it, but he [42:48] was truly independent; he always lived [42:50] by himself. [42:53] He might have had relationships in the [42:55] past, but I didn't ask much; regardless [42:57] , he’s lived alone for a long time now. [43:00] He just listens to opera at home every [43:02] day. Yeah. [43:03] >> He’s already retired, you see. He just [43:05] listens to operas all day. Every time [43:07] you visit him, the moment you walk in, [43:09] he’s like, "Oh, in this opera, the [43:11] heavens are about to collapse," or [43:13] something like that, but— [43:15] >> You—I really don’t see a shred of need [43:17] in him to break out of this kind of life [43:19] . [43:20] Besides his constant traveling, I’ve [43:22] noticed he replies to emails really [43:23] quickly, and he writes so much. You [43:25] write him one sentence, and he writes [43:27] back a ton. He seems to have so much [43:29] time. Other than that, I’ve noticed his [43:31] vibe is exactly what we call "having no [43:33] desires makes one strong"; it’s as if he [43:35] has no demands of the outside world at [43:37] all. And at his stage in life, he [43:38] doesn't need to chase fame or fortune, [43:40] nor does he need to build any complex [43:42] interpersonal relationships. He's just [43:44] on his own. I really feel he enjoys this [43:47] state. [43:49] To me, he’s quite an example that a [43:50] person can actually attain that kind of [43:52] state. [43:54] >> So, we must respect people’s differences [43:56] . [43:57] Traditionally speaking, is it human [43:59] nature, as Jiahui said, to still need a [44:02] partner, or even to need family life? [44:05] We don't know. [44:06] Some people are obviously fine living [44:08] alone their whole lives, staying healthy [44:11] . [44:12] That’s one type of person, but could [44:14] there be another type where, if they [44:16] were really left alone in a room for a [44:18] long time, would they develop problems? [44:22] >> Some are definitely fine, but you can’t [44:24] say it’s perfectly fine for everyone. [44:26] For instance, at least some people might [44:28] display extreme sensitivity in their [44:30] personality. [44:32] >> Mm. [44:32] >> Well, of course. [44:33] >> It’s like, towards other people's words [44:35] —if you always live alone, you tend to [44:38] magnify the impact of others 'comments. [44:40] >> It’s something some psychologists have [44:42] summarized, though it clearly doesn't [44:44] apply to everyone. [44:46] As you said, we should respect [44:48] everyone's differences; it's best to [44:50] have all kinds. [44:54] Like the professor you mentioned in the [44:56] UK, the feminist novelist Iris Murdoch [44:58] from Oxford—she passed away, an [45:00] important writer—and her husband, the [45:02] professor John Bayley, whose story was [45:04] made into a movie... [45:07] >> It's called "Iris." [45:10] In the movie, he recalls falling in love [45:12] and marrying his wife back when they [45:14] were university students. [45:19] There’s a very interesting part in it [45:21] where he talks about their long marriage [45:22] and asks what the most beautiful moment [45:24] was. [45:26] Being alone together. [45:29] >> Being together is fine, but there's also [45:31] that sense of "being alone together." [45:36] Simply put, it means that while you can [45:38] rely on each other, you still have your [45:40] own freedom and personal space. [45:44] To be more specific, my wife is a writer [45:47] , so she creates. [45:49] She needs a very free soul. [45:54] Even though we are a married couple, [45:56] about every six months, she goes off to [45:58] a place—a community where there are [46:00] painters, musicians, and all kinds of [46:01] people. [46:06] She goes there for a week or two, and I [46:07] don't ask her about it. [46:10] I know if I asked, she wouldn't say, so [46:12] I just don't ask. [46:14] Anyway, she has to disappear for two [46:16] weeks every six months. [46:19] When she comes back, she can start [46:21] creating again and return to her own [46:22] life. [46:24] Isn't that the most ideal situation, [46:26] right? [46:28] You're together, you're "alone together [46:30] ," yet every six months she can go out [46:32] to find her own space for inspiration. [46:35] Yes, life is actually progressing. [46:41] You realize that in the past, many large [46:43] families had their own sorrows, [46:45] including the pressure to integrate into [46:47] a collective or social life, which often [46:49] caused spiritual harm. [46:55] But now, we have the conditions for [46:57] everyone to have their own little world [46:58] . [47:01] However, I think we can look at this [47:03] more realistically. [47:05] Like you said, when you get sick, you [47:07] might feel that this is a problem with [47:09] living alone. [47:11] We can look at what kind of world the [47:13] modern world is; it’s a state where [47:14] family functions are constantly being [47:16] stripped away, right? For instance, in [47:18] the past, birth, aging, illness, and [47:20] death all took place at home. [47:21] >> Later, most of us don't give birth at [47:23] home anymore, and we don't die at home [47:25] either. [47:26] >> We don't recover from illnesses at home [47:28] anymore; it's all become socialized. [47:30] >> So, [47:33] >> Consequently, many functions that [47:35] families originally provided for mutual [47:37] support are also being stripped away. [47:42] For example, looking at the countries [47:44] with high rates of solitary living, [47:46] besides developing nations, what else is [47:49] there? [47:51] Like Japan, for instance. How does it [47:53] work there? [47:54] Almost all of their family functions [47:56] have been outsourced. When I press a [47:58] button, someone is always there to [47:59] provide emergency care. [48:01] >> When the entire senior living [48:03] arrangement is so well-organized. [48:06] When even many household appliances are [48:08] designed specifically from the [48:10] perspective of elderly people living [48:11] alone, [48:13] >> it means all your needs can be met by [48:15] strangers. [48:17] When your needs can be met by strangers [48:19] or technology, do you truly still need [48:21] someone else to live with you? [48:24] >> Well, so you see, this is a general [48:27] systemic trend, right? On one hand, [48:29] objectively speaking, households are [48:31] becoming smaller and smaller, with [48:33] individuals as the unit; but on the [48:35] other hand, social services are [48:36] increasingly catching up. [48:38] >> So under these circumstances, I think [48:40] ... [48:40] >> That is to say, the wealthier and more [48:42] developed a place is, the more [48:44] conditions it creates for living alone. [48:48] >> But I feel this needs further discussion [48:49] . [48:52] In my view, under these circumstances, [48:54] there is even more reason not to live [48:56] alone. [49:01] Living together is no longer a practical [49:03] need for mutual care, but has turned [49:05] into a pure relationship. [49:08] >> How romantic. This is a community of [49:10] shared life. [49:13] I am with you not so you can take care [49:15] of me when I'm sick, not so you can [49:16] clean up after me when I die, and not so [49:18] you can cook for me. [49:21] I just want to be with you in this space [49:23] . [49:24] >> The wife is nodding, my sister-in-law is [49:26] nodding, she’s nodding—well said, well [49:29] said. [49:29] >> He says this all the time. [49:30] >> It’s different when the wife is here.