窦文涛马未都解析阶层突围 称底层靠极度勤勉与逢迎破局

小人物想翻身?窦文涛的这个方法不高明,但很好使!#圆桌派 #窦文涛 #逆袭 #成功 #职场 — 纪实万象

纪实万象

优越家境因缺乏生存危机而削弱竞争野心,真正促成阶层跃升的是底层焦虑所激发的专注勤勉与社交周旋能力。

AI-assisted summary of 小人物想翻身?窦文涛的这个方法不高明,但很好使!#圆桌派 #窦文涛 #逆袭 #成功 #职场 — original source. Check the original for full context.

Source published:

Key ideas

  • 窦文涛与马未都探讨人际吹捧与逢迎的心理机制,认为成熟社交中的互相赞赏并非单纯虚伪,而是重塑认知、主动发掘他人优点的“修养”与社交润滑剂。 (0:00)
  • 词语“拍马屁”考证源于元代蒙古骑兵习俗,在四等人的等级压迫下异化为汉人不论良莠皆盲目逢迎的自保与谄媚姿态。 (4:25)
  • 周轶君坦言作为“凤凰女”的童年自卑感构成了成年后奋进的最强动力,而窦文涛对比指出平民与大院子弟在心理底色与公共空间表达欲上存在鲜明差异。 (21:55)
  • 马未都界定“目标”与“理想”的本质界限:凡是现实中能够实现并完成的只能称作目标,真正的理想在本质上应当是不可企及但永恒指引前行的彼岸。 (50:11)

Detailed notes

## Background 本期内容由YouTube频道“纪实万象”于2026年11月4日发布。视频选自文化脱口秀节目《圆桌派》,由窦文涛携手马未都、周轶君、柯蓝等嘉宾围桌而坐,延续真实不“装”的聊天风格,海阔天空地探讨人性、阶层、处世哲学与认知突围。

## TL;DR 节目围绕人际社交中的“拍马屁”与个体的成长背景展开深入探讨。窦文涛与马未都从元代“拍马屁”的词源、老北京餐馆“撂高儿”的处世绝活,剖析了逢迎背后惊人的记忆力门槛与情商分寸,并将其升华为主观发现他人美德的内省修行。随后,嘉宾们结合自身经历,尖锐对比了部队大院子弟与平民、小镇“凤凰女”在自卑感、公共羞耻心与行事格局上的性格烙印,反思家族历史与时代大洗牌对人格的深远塑造。对谈最后落在阶层跨越的代价、恶人与狠人的勤奋,以及目标与无法企及的“理想”之间的本质分野。

## Atmosphere & style 全片充盈着老友围炉茶聚般既犀利又松弛的谈话氛围。窦文涛一贯以自嘲、放低姿态的“陪聊”风格巧妙穿针引线,马未都则凭借丰富阅历随手抛出市井典故与通透洞察,席间既有对社交名利场张冠李戴的捧腹大笑,也有对贫寒出身、公共羞耻感与家族苦难的冷峻剖析。整场对话在幽默戏谑与深刻的人性反思之间无缝流转,带有一种历经世事后的坦然与清醒。

## Bulletin - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=0s) 窦文涛与马未都探讨人际吹捧与逢迎的心理机制,认为成熟社交中的互相赞赏并非单纯虚伪,而是重塑认知、主动发掘他人优点的“修养”与社交润滑剂。 - [04:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=265s) 词语“拍马屁”考证源于元代蒙古骑兵习俗,在四等人的等级压迫下异化为汉人不论良莠皆盲目逢迎的自保与谄媚姿态。 - [21:55](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=1315s) 周轶君坦言作为“凤凰女”的童年自卑感构成了成年后奋进的最强动力,而窦文涛对比指出平民与大院子弟在心理底色与公共空间表达欲上存在鲜明差异。 - [50:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=3011s) 马未都界定“目标”与“理想”的本质界限:凡是现实中能够实现并完成的只能称作目标,真正的理想在本质上应当是不可企及但永恒指引前行的彼岸。

## Key takeaways - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=0s) 窦文涛反思早年不苟言笑的傲气,随着阅历增长发现年长者习惯互相赞美,日常吹捧反而成为强迫自己敏锐发掘他人优点的认知过滤器与个人修养。 - [01:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=103s) 马未都以刘震云三日 cafeteria 赞美王朔使其卸防为例,指出中年人自尊脆弱且好为人师,在文人名利场中互捧往往是不可或缺的润滑工具。 - [04:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=265s) 当代“老师”等尊称因滥用而严重贬值;“拍马屁”在历史上折射出元代四等人的压迫烙印,演变为一种弯腰探颈、过度谦卑的身体本能。 - [06:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=408s) 对比印度严格的种姓制度,中国近代建构出人人都自认是“主人”的扁平饼状社会,传统讲究分寸与体面的服务规矩和仆从礼仪在很大程度上被拆解。 - [09:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=591s) 旧时北京堂倌“撂高儿”凭借过目不忘的惊人记忆与“置身半步之下”的分寸感维持高收入,证明高级迎合本质上是高智商与高情商的结合。 - [14:20](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=860s) 上层对逢迎的接受常建立在才华与急智之上,如袁枚“百顶高帽”的机锋与纪晓岚五旬寿联的文采,逢迎者往往与被奉承者形成心照不宣的心理共谋。 - [18:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=1112s) 创作者与行家被当面夸奖时往往感到尴尬无措,并非出于自卑,而是源于对自身专业作品优劣心知肚明的清醒。 - [21:55](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=1315s) 周轶君剖析来自封闭铁路大院的自卑感与向外挑旧衣服的屈辱记忆,成为她终身逃离宿命、驱动成长的决定性力量。 - [23:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=1417s) 窦文涛认为大院出身者常具备无所顾忌占用公共资源的任性与“C位”感,而平民出身者则更倾向于压抑自我、恪守克制与羞耻感;柯蓝则反驳称大院的公有制背景不能作为个人品性的遮羞布。 - [30:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=1837s) 老派“老炮儿”最核心的精神内核在于“做事不计成本”,这与当代功利社会精密算计得失、稍遇利益冲突便抽身背信的做派形成鲜明对照。 - [33:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=1982s) 家庭出身的显赫与否不能代替个人修养,缺乏知耻感与精神敬畏的极端利己者(如《人民的名义》中的祁同伟),其悲剧根源在于家教底线的缺失而非单纯的出身贫寒。 - [37:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=2235s) 中国近百年战乱与革命打破了原有的门第阶层,赤贫孤儿与显赫名门的后代频繁重组结合,构成了现代家族变迁的历史必然。 - [41:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=2460s) 小地方出身的平民被规矩和自卑束缚,面对不公往往选择隐忍;而北京子弟敢于当场掀桌的洒脱,在另一层面上也源于其对占用公共资源缺乏边界感与羞耻心。 - [45:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=2710s) 煤老板全额买单、红二代聚集朗诵打油诗的荒诞聚会,揭示出在时代与资本的剧烈洗牌下,曾经显赫的血统优越感最终沦为附庸的现实滑稽。 - [46:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=2797s) 狠人与底层逆袭者往往凭借专注与超常勤奋爬上高位,而传统小农心态的人则因容易知足、守着一亩三分地而保持安稳。 - [50:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=3011s) 马未都将人生追求区分为“目标”与“理想”:能够执行落地的属于目标,而不可实现却能提供长久精神指引的才是理想。 - [52:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=3129s) 窦文涛坦承长年从事抛头露面的传媒行业内心极其分裂,自己最现实的人生目标是积累足够保障后及早退休离开名利场。

## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=0s) Flattery as Inner Cultivation and Shifting Perspectives

Dou Wentao reflects candidly on how his attitude toward flattery and interpersonal warmth evolved over his career. Admitting that he used to carry himself with an unyielding, stony expression, Dou explains that in his earlier years he rarely smiled when meeting people, which often led others to assume he was cold, aloof, or judging them by appearances. Even when he genuinely needed a favor, his pride and social awkwardness prevented him from buttering people up; the words simply caught in his throat. However, as his circle shifted to include older, more seasoned figures like Ma Weidu, he began noticing a distinct dining culture among veterans: gatherings were characterized by relentless mutual praise rather than sharp critique. When Dou asked why their group spent so much time showering one another with compliments, Ma Weidu gave an answer that stuck with him: “Because we're older and more mature, so we only say nice things to one another.”

While this non-stop exchange of pleasantries initially felt sickening or insincere to Dou, he gradually discovered that regular outward praise subtly reshaped his internal mindset. Practicing habitual appreciation acted as a cognitive filter, training his eyes to become acutely sensitive to people's strengths rather than their shortcomings. Pointing to Xiao Qing across the table, Dou notes that he has reached a stage where he instinctively perceives her grace and can barely register any flaws. To Dou, reaching a place where looking for faults requires deliberate mental effort while seeing virtue happens automatically represents an elevated personal state: “My first instinct is to see their good side—only their good side—which is a form of inner evolution.”

[01:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=103s) Generational Banter vs. the Literary Circle's Flattery Trap

A younger guest pushes back against this elder gentility, noting that younger social circles bond through playful teasing, biting banter, and collective roasting rather than polite affirmation. Dinners among their peers frequently devolve into comedic character assassinations framed around astrology: Taureans are praised, Scorpios are labeled shameless and lecherous, and Pisces are crowned the elite masters of moral bankruptcy who win people over by an utter absence of virtue. The guest jokes that Aries only grow heads to look taller, suggesting an Aries and a Scorpio might combine to produce a truly terrifying child, highlighting why younger crowds rarely enjoy stiff, formal gatherings. Ma Weidu agrees that this dynamic is entirely different, noting that mature adults, unlike twenty-somethings, have fragile professional egos: “No matter how you say it, middle-aged folks aren’t comfortable being lectured, unless they’re very close to you.”

Ma Weidu illustrates the delicate art of middle-aged flattery by looking back at his days as an editor dealing with notoriously arrogant writers, who naturally believed their work was superior to everyone else's. When an entire room was filled with aloof literary figures, mutual complimenting was the only viable social lubricant. To show how praise can disarm even the fiercest cynic, Ma recounts how the novelist Liu Zhenyun systematically laid a trap for Wang Shuo in the cafeteria back when everyone stood in line carrying aluminum food trays. On day one, Liu praised Wang's novels, and Wang brushed it off with modest self-deprecation. On day two, Liu repeated the compliment and invoked other people's admiration, while Wang continued to deflect. By the third day of relentless flattery, Wang finally let his guard down and conceded that his novels were indeed quite good. Sitting at the very same table, Ma watched as Liu Zhenyun turned around and wryly exposed human vanity: “Most people can only hold out for three days before they fall for the flattery, right?”

[04:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=265s) The Dilution of Titles and the Yuan Dynasty Etymology of "Paimapi"

The discussion broadens to the debasement of everyday language, specifically how casual flattery morphed into the ubiquitous habit of addressing virtually everyone as "Teacher" (老师). Ma Weidu voices his irritation with this trend, remarking that young people now indiscriminately toss the title around until all traditional honorifics lose their weight and meaning. While terms like "Mr. Zhang" or "Mr. Li" once conveyed genuine, dignified respect, the title of teacher has been flattened into a vulgar social tick: “A teacher must have something to teach you, and some people simply have nothing to offer.”

Dou Wentao and Ma Weidu then explore the historical origins of the Chinese idiom for sucking up, *paimapi* (literally "patting a horse's rump"). The phrase traces back to the Yuan Dynasty, following the Mongol conquest of China. The Mongol rulers established a four-tiered ethnic hierarchy that placed Mongols at the top, Northern Han in the third tier, and Southern Han at the very bottom. Among nomadic Mongols, patting a fellow rider’s horse on the rump and praising the animal was a customary gesture of respect toward the rider. Subjugated Han subjects, desperate to curry favor with the ruling class, adopted the habit indiscriminately, aggressively patting the rump of any passing mount whether it was a prized steed, a wretched nag, or even a donkey. Dou points out that unlike Western praise, which is delivered with heads held high and a dignified posture, Chinese flattery historically carries a distinct posture of deference:

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Origin and Evolution of Paimapi accDescr: Diagram tracing the historical roots of the flattery idiom from Mongol equestrian customs under the Yuan Dynasty hierarchy to modern behavioral habits.

subgraph YuanDynasty["Yuan Dynasty Origins"] A["Mongol Equestrian Custom:<br/>Patting horse rump to respect rider"] --> B["Four-Tier Ethnic Caste:<br/>Han subjects relegated to lower tiers"] B --> C["Indiscriminate Flattery:<br/>Patting any horse or donkey to curry favor"] end

subgraph CulturalTrait["Psychological & Physical Legacy"] C --> D["Deep-seated Servility & Deference"] D --> E["Physical Embodiment:<br/>Forward-leaning neck and curved spine"] end ```

Dou reflects on his own physical posture, wondering if his chronic forward head posture and bent spine are the lingering physical manifestations of an ingrained submissive urge.

[06:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=408s) Servanthood, Evolutionary Conformity, and the Flattening of Social Hierarchy

Expanding on the instinctive drive to appease authority, the table examines the evolutionary and psychological roots of conformity. In anthropology and the animal kingdom, survival often hinges on blending in with the dominant power structure. Anthropological observations show that children, whether biological or adopted, gradually develop facial expressions and mannerisms that mirror the male head of the household to avoid rejection, since standing out within a group invites hostility. Dou notes that flattery operates on the same subconscious wavelength: it is not merely superficial hypocrisy, but an internal mechanism that reshapes perception. To illustrate this, Ma Weidu recalls watching a powerful leader produce an atrocious piece of calligraphy that ripped clean through the paper; without missing a beat or calculating his words, the secretary gasped in sheer, reflexive awe: “Wow, excellent, the ink truly penetrates the paper!”

Ma Weidu contrasts this deep-rooted servitude with modern workplace dynamics. Historically, society possessed a sophisticated "servant culture" with clear reciprocal duties and recognized stations. Unlike India's entrenched four-caste system, which made social management comparatively structured, modern China rejected formal caste divisions, creating what Ma describes as a concentric "pancake" society—mirrored by Beijing's nested ring roads—where everyone considers themselves entitled to supreme status. Since the founding narrative taught every citizen from birth to be the "master of the house," people never developed the traditional craftsmanship, grace, or etiquette of dedicated service. The old, highly refined social codes that governed stable relations between servers and guests in traditional teahouses and restaurants were dismantled, leaving people ill-equipped to serve others gracefully: “Chinese people don't think anyone is lower in the social hierarchy.”

- **Historical caste comparison**: India's governance relies on four clearly defined social tiers, whereas China functions like a flat, multi-layered pancake where nobody accepts being lower than anyone else. - **Urban metaphor**: Beijing's traffic and nested ring roads (Second, Third, and Fourth Rings) mirror this layered pancake structure, creating heavy systemic friction. - **Calligraphy anecdote**: An official ripped his parchment while writing, prompting an immediate subconscious compliment from his assistant claiming the ink had "penetrated the paper" (*li tou zhi bei*).

[09:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=591s) 服务观念的演变与餐厅“撂高儿”的绝活

从过去到现代,餐饮服务行业的心态与生态发生了巨大转变。解放前,堂倌和伙计把顾客看作衣食父母,“你是来给我送钱的”,因而伺候得真心实意;到了解放后,劳动者翻身做了主人,服务关系随之颠倒,以至于八十年代北京的一些饭馆甚至会挂出“不许无故殴打顾客”的警示牌。如今,餐饮业大量吸纳来自农村的务工人员,经过正规的礼仪与业务培训重新树立了职业化服务。然而,过度热情也常闹笑话:有嘉宾分享自己在一家山东菜馆只吃过一次饭,一位性格豪爽的北方女服务员便发短信自称专属管家,一口一个“大哥”地嘘寒问暖;可后来这位客人再也不敢去了,因为无论他带着女同事、女朋友还是外甥女前往,那位记性不佳的服务员一概热络地喊对方“嫂子”,让人哭笑不得。

老北京餐饮业自晚清繁盛以来,前厅有一类极具分量的人物,被称为“撂高儿”。这一行当靠的绝非单纯的油嘴滑舌,其立身之本是惊人的记忆力与极高的情商。马未都介绍道:

> “他最主要的本事是记忆力,只要你来过一次,他记着你哪天来的,因为什么来的。”

无论是顾客孙子即将办满月酒,还是上回因何事宴请,“撂高儿”在门外一眼瞥见便能倒背如流,老远就高喊“某爷来了”,既让熟客倍感体面,又绝不会在客人携不同女伴时失言戳破。在言辞分寸上,他们更是拿捏得恰到好处,“永远把自己放在你半步之下”,既不过分谄媚让人难堪,又牢牢守住主仆界限。凭借这份过目不忘的才干,“撂高儿”在旧时代收入极高,也让顾客在外赚足了面子,堪称不着痕迹的高级奉承。

[13:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=786s) 逢迎的艺术与记忆力门槛

当代年轻人往往对逢迎周旋嗤之以鼻,甚至缺乏这方面的应对能力。但在现实社会中,那种让人如沐春风的高段位迎合,往往体现为心中装着别人的高情商与高智商。嘉宾举了一个亲身经历的例子:曾与某市政府领导聚餐开会,会前双方在长桌上频繁交换名片;待领导发言完毕轮到己方致辞时,同行的一位经理站起身来,不看名单便一字不差地将“尊敬的某市长、某书记、某局长”等数十位官员的姓名与职务顺畅报出,博得全场雷鸣般的掌声。这种惊艳四座的表现完全依赖过人的智商与瞬间记忆,寻常人根本无法企及。

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 奉承与逢迎的层级差异 accDescr: 对比低级逢迎与高级记忆型逢迎在技巧与效果上的不同表现

subgraph LowLevel ["低级逢迎"] A["一眼看穿的谄媚"] --> B["引发戒备与尴尬"] end

subgraph HighLevel ["高段位逢迎(如'撂高儿'与精英管理者)"] C["惊人记忆力"] --> E["熟记姓名、背景与往事细节"] D["精准分寸感"] --> F["言辞永远居于对方'半步之下'"] E --> G["如沐春风、心悦诚服"] F --> G end ```

[14:20](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=860s) 富豪的排场与才子的高帽

奉承与受奉承往往是一种心照不宣的共谋。马未都分享了一桩亲眼所见的大老板做派:一位榜上有名的商界巨贾约他在自家的酒店大堂见面,发信息称自己刚在健身房练完马上就到。五分钟后,富豪身着时尚运动服外套大衣走入大堂,一见马未都,双肩轻轻一抖,身后候着的随从便分秒不差地稳稳接住滑落的大衣,气派犹如周星驰电影般夸张。紧接着,富豪手随性一挥,随从立刻递上一支点燃的香烟;富豪吸了一口开始高谈阔论“中国人瞎练,我请的是美国教练”,随从瞬间将烟抽走,待他手势悬停,另一人又将新烟精准塞入指间。专属电梯常年虚位以待,整套如行云流水般的伺候与排场显然经过反复排练。马未都打趣道:

> “他在那一晃,那衣服还在身上,这不就尴尬了吗?他就是享受这个,他享受这个,你以为他分得清真假吗?他可能就要这种范儿。”

针对这种心理,窦文涛引述了袁枚在《燕石衪/雪涛小说》中所记的“戴高帽”典故:袁枚外放做官前去辞别老师,声称准备了一百顶高帽子,因为世人都爱听好话;当老师批评此举不妥时,袁枚顺势奉承“天下像老师这般洁身自好的能有几人”,当场便将第一顶高帽送了出去。窦文涛指出,居高位者并非看不出奉承,有时折服他们的是奉承者惊艳的才华与急智。正如传说中纪晓岚为乾隆帝五旬寿辰题写对联,脱口而出“邦基四十万里,帝祚九千九百五十年”,将马屁拍得气势恢宏、文采斐然,即便皇帝明知是逢迎,也挑不出半点瑕疵。

- 袁枚典故:准备一百顶高帽外放做官,告别恩师时当面送出第一顶,出门对随从笑称“只剩九十九顶”。 - 纪晓岚寿联传说:“邦基四十万里”(自古未有一统四万里的朝代),祝寿“九千九百五十年”,合称万岁。

[18:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=1112s) 被夸赞时的无所适从与专业清醒

谈及面对赞美时的真实心理,窦文涛困惑于自己为何总对别人的当面夸奖感到极其不适。每当在饭局上有人凑过来说“窦老师我常看您的节目”,他的第一反应往往是手足无措,本能地想要把话题岔开,甚至怀疑自己是不是骨子里带着一种自卑情结。

其他嘉宾对此深有共鸣,认为这种抗拒并非自卑,而是出于专业创作者的清醒。作为节目的制作者,自己心里最清楚每一期节目的优缺点,深知哪一场聊得精彩、哪一场留有遗憾。当外人将这些当做客套话挂在嘴边时,业内人士更倾向于将其视作严肃的业务探讨,而非单纯的情感吹捧;一旦对话流于虚浮的奉承,真正懂行的人自然会感到尴尬与坐立难安。

[19:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=1159s) 社交名利场上的认错人与“拍马屁”尴尬

窦文涛与马未都聊起公众人物在社交场合中常遇到的尴尬。马未都坦言,如今在私下或活动中偶遇女演员时,对方常常热情地上前寒暄:“马老师,您还记得我吗?”马未都虽然嘴上必定回应“记得,当然记得”,但心里其实完全认不出来,因为女演员的妆容造型多变,非常难以辨认;如果一旦叫错名字,场面就会彻底搞砸,“你顺嘴一秃噜,你就肯定错,然后你就做不成好人了”。

大家随即分享了种种张冠李戴的尴尬瞬间: - 颁奖典礼或直播现场,有人当着某位演员的面大夸“我特别喜欢您演的雍正”,结果对方一脸尴尬地纠正:“我演的是康熙。” - 甚至有人对着学者或名人张冠李戴,比如错把别人当成方舟子,称赞道:“方舟子老师,您既能打假又能写书,太棒了。” - 网络上流传张学友在舞台上卖力跳舞,台下近处的观众却扯着嗓子大喊“刘德华”。 - 吴大维在上海开酒吧,一个小姑娘兴冲冲跑过去打招呼,脱口而出喊的却是“吴孟达”。 - 黄渤也曾讲过亲身经历:有影迷跟他聊了半天,最后递上本子索要签名,聊着聊着却把他当成了王宝强;黄渤为了不让气氛难堪,只能硬着头皮在上面签下“王宝强”三个字。 - 鲁豫在机场也遇到过类似窘境,路人激动地拉着她表白“鲁豫老师我太喜欢你了”,当事人为了顺应对方的热情,便签名留念。

窦文涛分享了自己与相声名家姜昆同机出行的趣事。两人恰好坐在一起聊了一路,结果空乘或乘客走过来打招呼,先认出了窦文涛:“窦老师,我看您的节目!”随后转头看到旁边的姜昆,惊喜地补上一句:“马老师,您也在啊!”姜昆幽默化解了尴尬。窦文涛感慨,社交场上的赞美与讨好其实是门学问,马未都则指出,这种迎合必须是真诚的拍马屁,否则弄巧成拙只会变成“拍在马蹄子上”。

[21:55](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=1315s) 出身背景与性格烙印:凤凰女的自卑与逃离

窦文涛向在座嘉宾抛出了一个严肃的人生议题:“到了你今天这个岁数,你有没有琢磨过,你今天的许多优缺点,跟你的出身家庭有关系?”

周轶君非常坦然且笃定地承认,自己身上深层的自卑感恰恰成了驱动她不断前行的最大动力。她将自己形容为来自湖北的“凤凰女”,成长于典型的铁路大院家庭——父亲是铁路工程师,母亲是铁路子弟学校的老师。在那个相对封闭、自成一体的铁路系统社区里,弥漫着一种“输家”或者说一眼望得到头、宿命早已被锁定的沉闷氛围。正是那种强烈的压抑感,激发了她无论如何都要打破阶层固化、逃离原生环境的强烈渴望。

周轶君提到,自己成年后身上明显的“讨好型人格”——总是不自觉地想去迎合别人、让别人开心——本质上就源于童年深埋的自卑。她讲述了一段刻骨铭心的经历:大约十一二岁时,母亲带她去广州一个条件优越的远房亲戚家,去挑表姐穿剩下的旧衣服。那位负责张罗的大姨奶奶因为耳背,扯着极大的嗓门高喊:“去吧!翻吧!使劲翻!”那一刻,少年的自尊心被彻底击碎,周轶君感到无比难受:“那可能是我第一次特别清晰地意识到,我来自一个小城市,看到那些好衣服……那种自卑感,我觉得可能是一辈子最深刻的记忆之一。”

“我肯定是凤凰女的自卑,促成了我的成长,绝对是的。”周轶君这样总结道。

[23:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=1417s) 大院子弟、平民阶层与公众情绪的宣泄

窦文涛对比了在座四人的背景,半开玩笑地指出,自己和周轶君属于平民阶层,而马未都和柯蓝则属于新中国成立后的部队大院子弟。马未都解释道,自己小时候生活在空军大院,建国初期政权是由军人打下来的,因此在五六十年代,军队的生活待遇、后勤保障明显优于地方,至少在物资匮乏的岁月里能保证吃饱饭。

窦文涛借此剖析了地域与阶层对人性格的影响。来自石家庄的他表示,河北人骨子里有一种深沉的谦卑感,不习惯张扬个性,遇事往往选择自我克制、向内收敛。窦文涛对比了社会上的一些现象:有些人在公众场合或网络上遇到私生活不如意,就会把动静闹得满城风雨,宛如在全社会面前当众撒娇、任性宣泄情绪。

窦文涛观察发现,这种习惯成为众人关注焦点(“C位”意识)、遇事在公众面前毫不克制、觉得全社会都必须迁就包容自己的人,往往是在北京优渥环境或显赫大院背景中长大的孩子。而平民出身的人遇到家庭变故或情绪低落,首先想到的是“天下谁人不受苦,我凭什么占着社会资源去嚷嚷自己的私事”。

[26:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=1610s) 柯蓝驳斥背景论:大院的公有制底色与个人成长

面对窦文涛将这种“以自我为中心”的性格归咎于大院背景,柯蓝当场提出了尖锐的反驳。她强调,不能把家庭背景当成一个人成长中的借口或挡箭牌。

柯蓝回顾了那个特殊时代的真实样貌: - 当年的体制是绝对的公有制,干部家庭的家里连茶几、凳子、床铺全都是贴着标签的公家财产,根本没有任何真正意义上的私人财富。 - 虽说祖父母一辈当时的工资级别看似较高,但背后需要接济、供养的是老家庞大的几大家族亲属,实际生活极为节俭。 - “那时候所有的东西都是公家的,谁要是多拿公家一针一线那就是严重问题,哪有什么私产的概念?”

窦文涛追问柯蓝,是否正因从小见惯了公产,潜意识里会觉得外面的社会也理所当然该包容自己?柯蓝断然否认,并直言:“这我想得美啊,中国封建社会早就结束了,根本不可能。”

柯蓝指出,家庭背景仅仅反映了一个家庭的家教底色,绝不可能模式化地塑造出每一个人的性格走向;即便生长在同一个家庭,每个人的人格特质也是截然不同的,不应将个别人的傲慢或任性简单归因于特定的大院出身。

[28:31](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=1711s) 先天性情与后天环境的拉锯

嘉宾们顺着人生的挫折与立身之本展开探讨。一位嘉宾感慨,在历经无数次打击之后,自己才彻底明白“什么都不算数”——无论你之前做过什么,今天别人说你好你便好,明天说你坏你便坏;唯有在天塌下来时靠自己的脊梁骨去硬顶,这才是顶天立地的人,而这与出身富贵或贫穷没有本质关联,关键在于把个人的欲望降到最低。

马未都随即厘清,环境的造就与天生的禀赋是两回事。人们往往忽视了内在性格的遗传性。为了证明性格可以遗传,马未都以国际犬业联合会(Kennel Club)对纯种犬的评判标准作比:衡量一只纯种犬,除了公母的身高、体重等外形指标,最重要的硬指标其实是性格(temperament),且必须保证连续三代不发生变异。例如斗牛犬(bulldog),性格就是“你越逗它,它越凶狠”,无论后天生活环境多好都改变不了;而有的狗表面狂吠,被人一捅就往后退缩,这也是深入骨髓的遗传天性。

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 性格塑造的双重机制 accDescr: 展示遗传天性与后天社会规训对人类性格形成的相互作用

subgraph INNATE["先天基因遗传"] A["家族血脉传递<br/>(如祖辈性格特质)"] --> B["本能性情定型<br/>(如纯种犬气质指标)"] end

subgraph ACQUIRED["后天环境规训"] C["社会文化约束"] --> D["生活遭遇与挫败<br/>(碰壁后变得收敛)"] end

B --> E["成年后的完整人格"] D --> E ```

面对马未都“以狗观人”的类比,大家笑着承认,生活中常有人感叹某人言行举止极像其祖母,这种内在特质必然存在血缘代际传递。但窦文涛指出,人类与动物不同之处在于其后天可塑性极强,且深受社会文化的约束与修剪:“如果说老碰壁,你的性格也会变得收敛,对吧?”后天遭遇塑造了性格的外部轮廓,多数人的天性都在现实社会的碰撞中被反复修正磨平。

- 国际纯种犬认证标准核心:身高、体重之外,最关键的是连续三代稳定不变的“性情”(temperament)。 - 典型动物天性对照:斗牛犬越受挑衅越凶狠;部分犬种虚张声势但一经试探便退缩。 - 人的后天修正规律:未经历碰壁的环境会纵容本真性格,而频繁受挫则会迫使性格走向内敛沉稳。

---

[30:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=1837s) “老炮儿”精神:不算账与算小账的时代对照

话题顺势切入当时热映的电影《老炮儿》及其所代表的精神特质。马未都剖析道,“老炮儿”在历史上并不单纯指土生土长的北京胡同人,它往往关联着部队大院的背景,或是拥有极强文化自我认同的一群人。老炮儿最核心、最强悍的精神内核,在于“做事不计成本”。

> “这些‘老炮儿’最强烈的概念,就是做事不计成本;这才是老炮儿的精髓。” —— 马未都

现场嘉宾进一步对比了这种老派精神与现代功利社会的剧烈反差。今天绝大多数人做任何决定的第一反应就是精密地“算账”:付出这段时间是否划算?为了所谓的朋友、哥们儿去豁出身家性命到底值不值?稍微费时费力又无直接利益的“破事”,现代人立刻选择抽身;而讽刺的是,许多人反复机关算尽,最终还是走向了背信弃义。因此,从这个层面来看,所谓的“老派人”或出身背景,本质上指的不是阶层血统,而是做人做事的格局、心胸以及对人生的具体领悟。

---

[31:36](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=1896s) 祖母的挫折教育与苦难背后的家族底色

针对“出身与格局”的关联,女嘉宾周轶君分享了深刻影响自己的家庭教育。她提到自己出生在重男轻女的传统宗族观念中,作为大家庭的第一个孩子却偏偏是个女孩,而且长相也不及美丽的母亲,自幼承受着巨大的无形心理压力。她的祖母很早就警醒她:在一个男性主导的社会里,相貌平平的女孩唯有一条出路,那就是拼命读书,唯有阅读能抵御未来的孤独与冷落。

> “每当我自怨自艾、想死的时候,就有人扔过来一本书;你读了之后发现历史上的大人物都没死,那我凭什么去死?我还年轻漂亮着呢!” —— 周轶君

这种自幼植入的坚韧化解了成长期的许多极端情绪。周轶君回忆起小学一年级时,仅仅因为寒暑假作业做不完就感到天崩地裂、一度绝望到“想死”,如今看来自是荒诞可笑,但在当时,正是长辈递过来的书籍让她在浩瀚的历史风云中找到了参照,消解了眼前的自怜与困境。她感慨道,几乎每一个中国家庭拆解开来,其深处都是一部浸透汗水的血泪史;一个人若是真正读懂了自己家族在这几十年、上百年流变中所经历的风雨飘摇,往后在人生中遭遇任何坎坷,就都会觉得“这都不叫事儿”。

- 祖母传授的生存哲学:外貌无法依恃时,读书是女性建立独立人格与打破孤独的唯一捷径。 - 认知视野对苦难的降维打击:通过阅读历史人物的沉浮,将个人的微小挫败置于宏大时空中释怀。

---

[33:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=1982s) 银行实习生众生相与《人民的名义》祁同伟的家教缺失

围绕社会层面的阶层标签,窦文涛提及当年网络上一篇由企业HR撰写的爆款热文《寒门难出贵子》。文章记录了银行在招募一批实习生并最终仅能留用两人时的真实观察。该HR的资深同事仅凭新人的日常言行,就能精准辨别其家庭出身背景:

| 实习生出身类型 | 典型行为模式与社交表现 | HR与职场反馈 | |:--- |:--- |:--- | | **农村/寒门子弟** | 第二天上班到达最早,但极度缺乏社交技巧,进门拘谨甚至不敢主动跟同事打招呼。 | 勤勉有余但交际被动,难以快速融入复杂的职场环境。 | | **机关干部子弟** | 进门极懂人情世故,主动寒暄问候“您辛苦了”,并抢着倒水端茶,眼力见极强。 | 熟稔体制规则,处事游刃有余、滴水不漏。 | | **知识分子家庭子弟** | 自视甚高,神情间带着傲气与清高,常表现得不屑于迎合他人、不太合群。 | 个人能力或突出,但往往被评价为“有点各色”、缺乏团队协同意愿。 |

谈及这种行事风格与家风的关系,嘉宾们联想到《人民的名义》中的祁同伟。有人指出,祁同伟固然博得了很多同情,但他身上最大的悲剧正在于家庭教育与精神敬畏的彻底缺失——他毫无敬畏之心,亦无知耻之感,为了往上爬可以抛弃底线。嘉宾们反驳了那种将个人沉沦全盘推给“寒门出身”的借口,认为真正决定一个人底线高低的是家庭教养,而非单纯的贫富或阶级标签。

---

[34:59](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=2099s) 母亲的名门娇气与父亲的九死一生

顺着家庭源流的话题,嘉宾展开了对自己父母两个截然不同家族脉络的深情追忆。由于母亲健在且不上网看节目,他便毫无顾忌地调侃起母亲根深蒂固的“资产阶级生活习气”。其母虽然在北京生活,但一辈子极度挑剔,从不穿北京本地生产的鞋,只认准上海或广州产的精细款式;自幼偏爱昂贵巧克力与各种甜食。这种深入骨髓的讲究源自其深厚的家族底蕴:其母系家族自清朝道光年间起,连续五代皆是山东利津县首屈一指的大盐商、巨富之家,因此即便经历时代剧变,那些富养出来的脾性与习惯依然顽强保留了下来。

与娇生惯养的母亲形成极端对照的是其父亲那一脉的平民挣扎。嘉宾讲述了其祖辈九死一生的奋斗史: - **曾祖父的绝境求生**:曾祖父6岁丧父、12岁沦为孤儿,为了活命只能在东南沿海当渔民出海打鱼。出海在当年是死亡率仅次于下矿井的凶险营生。 - **拿命入股的原始积累**:当时的渔船体制没有现代公司,而是以生命为资本入股分红——只要敢拿命出海拼搏,就能分得一份船股,曾祖父正是靠着这种把脑袋别在裤腰带上的血汗打拼,一步步让家族脱贫起家。 - **代际跃升与从军报国**:积攒下产业后,曾祖父倾尽全力供其长孙(即嘉宾的父亲)读书,使其成为全家族第一个受正规教育的读书人。而正是这份文化底子,让其父在后来与乡邻三十九人一同毅然投笔从戎,经历抗日战争与解放战争的枪林弹雨,在多次著名战役的生死考验中杀出了一条血路。

[37:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=2235s) 战火幸存的必然与百年历史的“大洗牌”

谈话从战争时期的生存经验切入。马未都等人谈及一位老兵的传奇经历:从孟良崮战役打到济南战役、淮海战役、渡江战役,一路打进上海战役,经历无数恶战却完整幸存下来。马未都认为,能活到最后的往往不是盲目冲锋的人,而是有文化、有判断力的战士——“勇者必定智,盲目冲锋就把命交出去了”,打仗讲究全局眼光和远见,才能在战场上作出准确的预判。

这种个体的幸存与流动,深刻构成了中国近百年的家族史。有嘉宾谈到自己拍过的纪录片,讲述了两个截然不同的家庭:一方是连续三代赤贫、最终沦为孤儿的底层,另一方则是长年富庶的大户人家。原本门不当户不对的两个家族,却在战乱与革命中相遇并结合。这种单一家庭看似偶然的相遇,正是中国近百年历史大洗牌的必然结果。正如窦文涛与嘉宾所总结的:“这看似一个家庭的巧合,其实是中国百年历史的必然。”祖辈的颠覆与重组,让曾经讲究门第匹配的旧结构彻底瓦解,走进了千家万户的血脉之中。

[39:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=2340s) 河北与北京:地域衬托下的卑微感与祖坟之问

话题转向嘉宾们的出身与地域心理。窦文涛自嘲河北人骨子里总有一种衬托北京的宿命感:“你老回河北,河北的问题就在于它就是为了衬托北京而存在的。”这种地缘关系给河北人带来了长期的自卑与压抑感。窦文涛笑称自己聊天时总是习惯拉上同为河北老乡的嘉宾抱团壮胆,连当主持人也习惯性地放低姿态去“陪聊”,处处显得小心翼翼。

相比于马未都等北京子弟能清晰追溯祖辈身处中宣部或第四野战军的显赫履历,窦文涛感慨自己出身农民家庭,甚至连祖坟都早已无处可寻。他提到某年清明节曾问父亲自家的祖坟究竟在哪里、为何家里一直发不了财,父亲却轻描淡写地回答:“那地,村里平整土地说平就给平了,哪会通知咱啊。”这种属于普通农民的隐忍与把沉重化作虚无的态度,让窦文涛深受触动。

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: 两种背景下的心态差异对比 accDescr: 对比北京子弟与河北乡村出身在家庭根基、心理底色及处事风格上的差异。

subgraph BJ["北京子弟 / 优越阶层"] A1["家族渊源清晰\n(如四野/机关大院)"] --> A2["底气充沛、行事洒脱"] A2 --> A3["不惧规则、敢于掀桌"] end

subgraph HB["河北乡村 / 底层平民"] B1["宗族记忆断裂\n(祖坟被平、无从追溯)"] --> B2["隐忍低调、自认卑微"] B2 --> B3["恪守规矩、逆来顺受"] end ```

[41:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=2460s) 霹雳舞大赛的退场:北京孩子的“不在乎”与规矩的约束

窦文涛分享了自己年轻时对“北京孩子”最深刻的一次震撼记忆。当年全国霹雳舞风靡一时,石家庄举办全国霹雳舞大赛,全场观众都看得出来评委暗箱操作、极其不公。来自河北等各省的外地队伍即便心知肚明,也只能默默忍气吞声,规规矩矩地把舞跳完然后退场。

然而,最后登场的几个北京青年彻底打破了这种驯服。他们舞技极佳,在完成最后一个潇洒利落的高难度动作后,带头的一人直接耸耸肩扔下一句冷笑:“去他的,不伺候了!”随后几个人头也不回地拂袖而去。这一幕给当时的窦文涛留下了极强的心灵冲击:“我就觉得北京人真横,根本不陪你玩。”他深刻感受到北京孩子的洒脱与放肆,而小地方出来的人却始终被沉重的规矩和自卑死死框住。

- 外地参赛者:面对明显不公的潜规则,选择咽下委屈、按部就班演完退场。 - 北京参赛者:跳出极高水准后当场掀桌,用一句“去他的”直接罢赛走人。 - 窦文涛反思:“我觉得他们就能活得那么由着性子、那么洒脱,而我们好像只能处处守规矩。”

[42:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=2541s) 占用公共资源的羞耻感与两代人的雄心差异

针对北京人身上的“放肆”,有嘉宾给出了另一种犀利的解释,认为这种所谓的洒脱本质上是对占用公共资源毫无羞耻感。小地方出身的人往往极度害怕麻烦他人,内心总觉得“我算什么,凭什么让大家听我这点破事”,因此在公共空间里处处退缩;而有些人则天然习惯成为全场的中心,哪怕是日常琐事或家庭抱怨,也能心安理得地摆在台面上让所有人围着转。

随后话题延伸到个人的竞争力与财富积累。当被问及“在座四人谁的资产最多”时,窦文涛打趣称自己唯一的资产就是身边的嘉宾和节目。另一位嘉宾回忆起20岁刚进Channel [V]工作时的往事,母亲看着这群成天混日子的年轻人冷冷断言:他们绝成不了大明星,因为他们只求安逸、缺乏宏大野心,本质上全是一群缺乏争夺意识的“孤魂野鬼”。

- 表达边界的心理分野:小地方人有着强烈的公共羞耻感,害怕自身琐事占用公众注意力;部分大城市子弟则天然具备极强的自我表达欲。 - 母亲的冷峻评价:“你们这帮孩子永远成不了大明星,为什么?因为你们贪图享乐,没有野心,全是一群孤魂野鬼。” - 奋斗动力的倒置:缺乏生存危机感的阶层往往丧失竞争狠劲,反倒是出身草根、被虚荣心和物质渴望推着往前走的人,在市场上杀出了最强的竞争力。

[45:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=2710s) 煤老板攒的“红二代”饭局与荒诞现实

窦文涛与嘉宾进一步探讨了“背景”与“最终结果”之间的荒谬反差。有嘉宾提到自己曾经被朋友硬拉去参加过一场极其荒唐的饭局。去之前主办方极力吹捧,声称现场聚集的全部是开国元勋的后代、“红二代”。

嘉宾硬着头皮赴约后,发现长桌上足足坐了三十号人,不少人端着架子,其中还有人长相神似贺龙等老一辈革命家的后人。然而,这场看似规格极高的聚会,买单的东道主实际上却只是一位来自河北的煤老板。在巨大的包间里,挂着显赫家世名头的后代们吃着煤老板买单的宴席,甚至轮番上台朗诵一些粗制滥造、不知所云的打油诗。整场饭局充斥着落魄与滑稽,这种强烈的错位感让嘉宾感到无比心酸与荒诞,也彻底剥开了所谓血统优越感在金钱与时代变迁面前的尴尬外衣。

[46:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=2797s) Family Background, Self-Restraint, and the Diligence of the Ruthless

The conversation continues with a critique of the assumption that elite family origins guarantee personal success. One of the speakers points out a dinner gathering filled with offspring of founding fathers and top officials who ultimately accomplished very little, remarking that family background only polishes superficial etiquette, whereas social education and individual restraint govern true achievement. When addressing personal trajectory, Dou Wentao reflects on his own background, noting that his father was merely a soldier rather than a high-ranking official. He attributes his survival and modest comfort to a deeply ingrained peasant mentality common to Hebei locals, where cultivating a small personal plot and being easily satisfied prevents reckless ambition.

In sharp contrast to this contented passivity stands the ruthless drive of characters like Qi Tongwei from *In the Name of the People*, who rise from impoverished rural roots through sheer, obsessive effort. The table debates whether this trait should be labeled malice or single-minded focus, noting that bad people often outwork others because good people tend to divide their energy. As Dou Wentao puts it when dissecting this relentless drive, “That's why he succeeded; let me tell you, bad people are the most diligent.”

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Paths of Personal Trajectory accDescr: Flowchart contrasting elite stagnation, smallholder contentment, and obsessive ambition. subgraph Stagnation["Elite Background"] A["High Social Origin"] --> B["Superficial Manners"] B --> C["Lack of Self-Restraint / Stagnation"] end subgraph Contentment["Smallholder Mentality"] D["Modest Peasant Roots"] --> E["Self-Restraint & Contentment"] E --> F["Quiet Stability on 'Small Plot'"] end subgraph Ambition["The 'Fierce' Climber"] G["Impoverished Background"] --> H["Single-Minded Obsession"] H --> I["Relentless Diligence / High-Stakes Ascent"] end ```

[48:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=2902s) Fierce People, Regional Insecurities, and Upbringing

The dialogue pivots to Lu Xun’s concept of "fierce people" who claw their way to the top by leveraging alliances with well-connected elites in mutually transactional relationships. Dou Wentao asks Jiang Fangzhou whether she ever experienced the common small-town student's feeling of inferiority when encountering classmates with polished Beijing accents at university. Jiang Fangzhou playfully brushes this aside, explaining that at Tsinghua University there were few native Beijing students to begin with, and she had already established her own reputation as a published young prodigy.

She recalls that her longing for Beijing existed much earlier: at six and a half years old, her second elementary school essay was titled "I Want to Be Born in Beijing." The guests note that Beijing has historically been populated by migrants from across China rather than an insular native elite, meaning regional background is secondary to maternal and familial influence. Reflecting on her choices, Jiang Fangzhou emphasizes that an upbringing rooted in intellectual autonomy allowed her to cast aside status anxieties. When describing her refusal to conform to conventional material expectations, she asserts, “Knowing the background I come from, I’ve chosen to live a very simple life.”

[50:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=3011s) From Rich Peasant to Landlord: The True Nature of Ideals

The discussion turns to financial security versus personal pride, with Jiang Fangzhou declaring that she would invariably prioritize dignity over wealth. The panel playfully teases Dou Wentao for his recurring self-deprecation as a humble, weary peasant clinging to a modest plot, observing that he has systematically elevated himself into a recognized cultural brand—transforming from a struggling newcomer into an established landlord figure. Dou Wentao deflects the praise, claiming that true revolutionary paths are too rugged for him, which prompts a philosophical debate about whether such convictions are simply early forms of idealism, comparable to the Decembrists or the earliest revolutionaries.

Asked about her own ideal, Jiang Fangzhou defines it simply as the ability to write a literary work with which she is genuinely satisfied. Ma Weidu then steps in to delineate the fundamental conceptual boundary separating achievable targets from lifelong aspirations. When asked to formulate his own ideal under pressure, Ma Weidu clarifies, “I believe that an ideal is something unattainable by nature. Anything that can be achieved shouldn't be called an ideal; that's called a goal.” He argues that the true beauty of an ideal lies in having an unreachable standard that perpetually guides a person forward.

- **Jiang Fangzhou's definition of fulfillment:** Pursuing literary integrity over status by writing work she genuinely respects. - **Ma Weidu's philosophical distinction:** - *Goal:* An objective that can be practically executed and completed. - *Ideal:* An inherently unattainable guiding light that perpetually pulls an individual forward.

[52:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=3129s) The Host's Internal Conflict, Wealth, and the Path to Retirement

As the conversation draws toward its conclusion, the panelists examine their current emotional states, aging past fifty, and feelings of vulnerability. Dou Wentao admits that appearing on camera and broadcasting his opinions has always felt like an uncomfortable act of exposure that requires overcoming a deep internal aversion to ostentatious self-promotion. He remarks on the central contradiction of his career: working inside what he self-deprecatingly calls a shameless industry while harboring a profound desire to step away entirely. Clarifying his ultimate professional objective, Dou Wentao admits, “You’re in this shameless profession, but you have no idea how conflicted I am inside—my goal is actually to retire.”

The group discusses the practical barrier to that exit: accumulating sufficient wealth so that one never worries about material survival, to the point where one struggles only with how to spend it. Bantering about finding romantic partners without excessive consumerist desires versus the boredom of living without material pursuits, the table closes the exchange with warm toasts, wishing each other success in reaching their practical goals while preserving sincerity, integrity, and impossible ideals.

## Notable quotes > [50:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=3011s) I believe that an ideal is something unattainable by nature. Anything that can be achieved shouldn't be called an ideal; that's called a goal. — Ma Weidu

> [01:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=103s) No matter how you say it, middle-aged folks aren’t comfortable being lectured, unless they’re very close to you. — Ma Weidu

> [06:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=408s) Chinese people don't think anyone is lower in the social hierarchy. — Ma Weidu

> [21:55](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=1315s) 我肯定是凤凰女的自卑,促成了我的成长,绝对是的。 — 周轶君

## Mentioned 窦文涛, 马未都, 周轶君, 柯蓝, 蒋方舟, 刘震云, 王朔, 袁枚, 纪晓岚, 黄渤, 王宝强, 鲁豫, 姜昆, 吴大维, 吴孟达, 张学友, 刘德华, 祁同伟, 圆桌派, 老炮儿, 人民的名义, 燕石衪, 雪涛小说, Channel [V], 清华大学

## Video description 💡订阅我们,换个视角看懂万象: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwiWVn-hZq3_zuOk570kyGA

简介:《圆桌派》节目以圆桌为名,旨在体现圆桌席上人人平等,每期由窦文涛携手三位嘉宾,还原在生活中发生在圆桌旁、海阔天空的精彩聊天。延续真实不“装”的窦式主持风格,立足网络,放眼世间,神侃包罗万象的话题,嬉笑言谈中彼此迸发出智慧火花。

【圆桌派 窦文涛】人性 · 社会 · 认知:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYxKs_Kmt18U 【鸿观·宋鸿兵】金融 · 权力 · 逻辑:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLcTh2pbxeb-o 【观复嘟嘟 马未都】历史 · 收藏 · 人生:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLOBX8CQ3IYr0 【第一人称复数 周轶君】青年 · 女性 · 世界:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLE0SKDns16wY 【风马牛书房 冯仑】财富 · 经济 · 规律:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBtYaSLkGpag 【百家新说 尹烨】科技 · 生命 · 未来:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIUyn5AuyYUo 【众生 蔡永康】人物 · 命运 · 社会观察:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIOgZ1dPF0JA 【锵锵行天下 窦文涛】世界 · 文明 · 思想:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIJzYJ5gZ-HA

#中国未来 #中国社会 #植物 #生态 #大自然 #经济 #推荐 #热门 #经济 #圆桌派 #纪实 #时间 #历史 #文化 #聊天 #新闻 #心理健康 #中美关系 #科技 #经济 #金融 #香港 #台湾 #hongkong #taiwan #民生 #纪实 #纪录片 #窦文涛 #周轶君 #马未都 #许子东 #尹烨 #圆桌派第七季 #圆桌派 #中国经济 #中国内卷 #中国危机 #地方债 #新能源车 #光伏 #经济危机 #中国房地产 #中美竞争 #科技创新 #制度决定一切 #民营经济 #企业家精神 #AI时代

[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY)

中文简报

窦文涛马未都解析阶层突围 称底层靠极度勤勉与逢迎破局 优越家境因缺乏生存危机而削弱竞争野心,真正促成阶层跃升的是底层焦虑所激发的专注勤勉与社交周旋能力。 节目围绕人际社交中的“拍马屁”与个体的成长背景展开深入探讨。窦文涛与马未都从元代“拍马屁”的词源、老北京餐馆“撂高儿”的处世绝活,剖析了逢迎背后惊人的记忆力门槛与情商分寸,并将其升华为主观发现他人美德的内省修行。随后,嘉宾们结合自身经历,尖锐对比了部队大院子弟与平民、小镇“凤凰女”在自卑感、公共羞耻心与行事格局上的性格烙印,反思家族历史与时代大洗牌对人格的深远塑造。对谈最后落在阶层跨越的代价、恶人与狠人的勤奋,以及目标与无法企及的“理想”之间的本质分野。 窦文涛与马未都探讨人际吹捧与逢迎的心理机制,认为成熟社交中的互相赞赏并非单纯虚伪,而是重塑认知、主动发掘他人优点的“修养”与社交润滑剂。 (0:00) 词语“拍马屁”考证源于元代蒙古骑兵习俗,在四等人的等级压迫下异化为汉人不论良莠皆盲目逢迎的自保与谄媚姿态。 (4:25) 周轶君坦言作为“凤凰女”的童年自卑感构成了成年后奋进的最强动力,而窦文涛对比指出平民与大院子弟在心理底色与公共空间表达欲上存在鲜明差异。 (21:55) 马未都界定“目标”与“理想”的本质界限:凡是现实中能够实现并完成的只能称作目标,真正的理想在本质上应当是不可企及但永恒指引前行的彼岸。 (50:11)

Reading summary

窦文涛与马未都等嘉宾在对谈中剖析了“逢迎”这一社交行为的演变,进而深入探讨了原生家庭、阶层出身与心理烙印对个人行事风格及人生轨迹的深远影响。 奉承心态的演进与社交技术门槛 (0:00) 窦文涛坦言早年因自尊与笨拙而抗拒说好话,但随着阅历增长,他发现长辈间习惯性的赞美并非虚伪,而是一种主动发现他人优点的认知进化。马未都指出成熟群体在社交中依赖相互赞美来润滑人际关系,并讲述了刘震云用连续三天赞美让王朔放下防备的趣事。二人还梳理了“拍马屁”在元代的起源:蒙古人拍马臀致意,被统治阶层为讨好统治者而不分优劣盲目模仿,演化出一种卑躬屈膝的心理与体态遗产。 然而,高级的逢迎与低劣谄媚存在本质差异。马未都介绍,晚清老北京餐饮业被称为“撂高儿”的前厅人物,其绝活并非油嘴滑舌,而是依靠过目不忘的记忆力记住客人的光顾时间与背景细节,并在言辞上“永远居于对方半步之下”,既保全客人面子又守住界限。这种高情商周旋在当代名利场中依然常见,比如企业高管在无名单提示下一字不差背出数十位官员头衔,这类高段位迎合门槛极高,往往建立在出色的智力与分寸感之上。 出身烙印:凤凰女的逃离与大院底色 (21:55) 谈及原生家庭与性格塑造,周轶君表示童年源于湖北铁路大院的自卑感和沉闷宿命,是驱动自己打破阶层、不断前行的最大动力。童年时期在广州亲戚家挑旧衣服时感受到的屈辱,在她心底埋下了讨好型人格与强烈的逃离渴望,但祖母关于“拼命读书以抵御平庸与孤独”的教育帮助她化解了成长期的极端自怜。相较于平民出身者的隐忍,窦文涛观察到部分大院或优渥背景的子弟在公共场合往往具有强烈的“C位”意识,遇事倾向于当众宣泄情绪,认为社会理应包容自己。 针对这种“背景决定论”,柯蓝提出了不同视角。她反驳将任性归咎于大院出身,指出那个时代体制实行绝对公有制,干部家庭没有私产概念,且需接济老家庞大家族,生活极为节俭。家庭背景仅体现家教底色,同一家庭走出的孩子人格特质也截然不同,无法模式化归因。嘉宾们同时反思了《人民的名义》中的祁同伟,指出其悲剧本质在于敬畏心与知耻感的家教缺失,而非单纯的寒门出身。 地缘差异、算账逻辑与底层韧性 (39:00) 地缘与社会结构差异对人的精神状态有着明显塑造。窦文涛自嘲河北人骨子里因长久衬托北京而带有强烈的卑微感,遇到不公习惯隐忍退让;而北京青年在霹雳舞大赛遭遇不公评判时,跳完高难度动作后直接拂袖而去、拒不配合潜规则。马未都将这种反差联系到“老炮儿”的精神内核,即“做事不计成本”,这与现代功利社会凡事精密“算账”的做派形成鲜明对比。但也有嘉宾指出,小地方出身的人具有公共羞耻感,害怕因琐事麻烦公众;而优渥阶层往往缺乏争夺的狠劲,反倒是出身草根、被生存危机感驱动的人在现实竞争中更具韧劲。 历史的洗牌进一步打破了既有阶层固化。嘉宾通过祖辈从赤贫渔民出海涉险积累股份、供长孙读书并投笔从戎经历解放战争的家族史,说明近代百年战火重塑了门第结构。而在荒诞的现实中,挂着显赫家世名头的“红二代”在河北煤老板买单的饭局上赋诗谋生,展现了血统光环在财富与时代变迁下的瓦解。在个人上升路径中,出身普通者若秉持专注与精进,其爆发出的勤勉与狠劲往往能超越缺乏自律的优渥阶层。 理想的界限与职业生存困境 (50:11) 对话最后转向个人的精神追求与职业生存状态。面对蒋方舟将写出满意作品作为理想并坚持自尊高于财富的选择,马未都厘清了“目标”与“理想”的概念界限:目标是可以实际执行并完成的具体任务,而理想在本质上应当是不可企及的,其价值恰恰在于作为一个永远无法达到的灯塔,持续拉动人向前迈进。 窦文涛则剖析了自身长期身处公众传媒行业的深层矛盾。他坦言出镜表达对自己而言始终伴随着暴露与自我推销的不适感,其终极职业目标实际上是彻底退休,但这一诉求又受制于物质积累的现实门槛。座谈在对务实目标达成与坚守真诚理想的期许中收尾。 本场对话展示了从表面逢迎艺术到深层阶层心理的跨度探讨,展现了家庭与地域环境对人格的深刻塑造;然而关于天生禀赋与后天环境何者更具决定性,以及个人能否彻底摆脱原生阶层心理烙印,嘉宾们并未得出单一结论。

精炼阅读摘要

窦文涛与嘉宾围绕赞美与逢迎的人际功能、阶层与地域对性格的塑造机制,以及阶层流动背后的心理烙印展开深度探讨。节目指出,看似虚伪的奉承可以转化为发现他人优点的认知修行,而底层个体的自卑与隐忍既催生了拼搏韧劲,也与优渥背景者的洒脱任性形成鲜明反差。 赞美的内化与逢迎的技艺门槛 (0:00) 窦文涛回顾了自身从刻板冷漠到习惯夸奖他人的转变。他指出,年长者聚会中的互赞起初显得虚伪,但长期践行却能重塑认知回路,使人本能地专注于他人的优点与美好,形成一种内在修行。马未都结合昔日文学编辑经历说明,面对心高气傲的作家圈,相互吹捧是必要的润滑剂;他援引作家刘震云在食堂连续三天当面赞美王朔、最终攻破其防线的往事,揭示了人性深处对赞美的难以抗拒。然而,社会上对“老师”等称谓的滥用则反映了尊称的通胀与廉价化。 探讨进一步追溯了“拍马屁”的词源与技术壁垒。马未都与窦文涛指出,该词源于元代汉人对蒙古统治阶层骑马习俗的盲目迎合,反映了阶级压迫下骨子里的谦卑与身体前倾的姿态。真正的逢迎并非拙劣谄媚,而是需要极高情商与记忆力支撑的专业门槛。例如晚清至民国老北京餐饮业中被称为“撂高儿”的堂倌,凭借过目不忘的本领熟记熟客的家世背景、交往细节,并在言辞分寸上永远居于顾客“半步之下”,既保全了客人体面又守住了界限。相比之下,当代低段位的奉承往往因张冠李戴(如错认演员角色或名字)而演变为社交灾难。 原生烙印:平民自卑与大院底气 (21:55) 嘉宾深入剖析了出身阶层与地缘文化对个人性格的长久塑造。周轶君将自己定义为来自封闭铁路大院的“凤凰女”,坦言童年时期随母亲去优渥亲戚家挑旧衣服时感受到的屈辱自卑,虽塑造了其讨好型人格,但也成为日后拼命逃离原生环境、打破阶层固化的核心动力。窦文涛则以石家庄农村出身为例,指出河北人在地缘上次生于北京的宿命感,造就了其隐忍克制、习惯放低身段“陪聊”,以及极度害怕占用公共资源的羞耻感。他以早年全国霹雳舞大赛为例,对比了外地队伍面对不公潜规则时的默默顺从,与北京选手跳完后冷笑拂袖而去的狂傲洒脱。 柯蓝与马未都对这种“阶层特质”展开了多重视角补充与反驳。针对窦文涛对“北京大院子弟习惯当中心、任性宣泄情绪”的观察,柯蓝强调家庭背景不应成为个人性格缺陷的挡箭牌;她回顾建国后大院体制内部一切家具均为公产、老一辈极度节俭的客观事实,主张家风家教而非特权环境才是个体底线的决定因素。马未都则引入国际纯种犬认证中三代性格稳定的硬指标,指出人类同样具有遗传性的先天性格底色,但人类的独特性在于后天遭遇社会碰撞与碰壁后,会不断对自身性情进行修正与收敛。 功利算计、阶层镜像与荒诞错位 (30:37) 马未都将老派“老炮儿”的文化精神界定为“做事不计成本”,这与现代商业社会凡事精密算账、稍有不划算便抽身甚至背信弃义的功利风气形成鲜明对照。嘉宾提及网络热文《寒门难出贵子》中银行HR的招聘观察,生动勾勒出阶层出身在职场初期投射的众生相:寒门子弟勤勉却拘谨被动,干部子弟熟稔体制人情、眼力极强,而知识分子子弟则清高自负。针对《人民的名义》中祁同伟式的底层攀爬者,嘉宾认为其悲剧不在于贫穷,而在于家庭教育中精神敬畏与知耻感的缺失,导致其在追求跃升的过程中毫无底线,体现出“坏人往往因目标极致单一而最为勤奋”的残酷现实。 谈话还剖析了中国近百年历史剧变带来的阶层重组与当下错位。近代战乱与革命打破了传统门当户对的结构,促成了盐商名门与九死一生赤贫军人的结合。然而,这种血脉流动在当代也衍生出奇特的荒诞景象:有嘉宾目睹多位以开国元勋后代自居的“红二代”聚餐,现场由一位河北煤老板买单,名门之后端着架子朗诵粗浅诗歌以换取宴席招待。这一幕彻底剥离了血统光环在金钱与时代剧变面前的虚妄外衣。 职业撕裂、精神突围与理想界定 (46:37) 在探讨个体如何抵御外部压力与内心动荡时,周轶君分享了祖母的教诲:在重男轻女且自身容貌平凡的环境中,唯有读书是女性抵御孤立、建立独立人格的捷径;通过在书籍中见证历史大人物的沉浮,个人的微小挫折便能被迅速释怀。窦文涛则反思了自身作为公众人物的内在精神撕裂——尽管深耕于需要暴露自我的电视行业,但他骨子里始终保留着传统农民耕作一亩三分地的知足心态,对自我宣传深感不适,其职业生涯的终极诉求其实是积累足够的物质安全感后彻底退休。 对话最后厘清了物质欲望、个人尊严与终极追求的关系。蒋方舟坚持将文学创作的自我认可置于财富积累之上,并选择践行低欲望的简单生活。马未都则对“目标”与“理想”进行了概念划界:他认为凡是通过具体规划能够执行并达成的事项只能称为“目标”;真正的“理想”在本质上应当是不可企及的,其价值恰恰在于作为一座悬挂在远方的恒久灯塔,永无止境地拉动个体保持前行,从而在世俗的名利争逐中维系一份纯粹与清醒。 本期节目通过对奉承社交、家庭出身与阶层心理的跨代际剖白,揭示了个体性格既是家族血脉与时代规训的产物,也是在不断碰壁中向内修剪的结果。嘉宾们虽然肯定了自卑感驱动奋斗的积极意义,并呼吁在功利社会中坚守精神敬畏与不可企及的崇高理想,但对于出身寒门者如何在向上攀爬的过程中平衡生存焦虑与道德底线,对谈仍留下了未竟的现实追问。

Source quotes

[50:11] Ma Weidu: I believe that an ideal is something unattainable by nature. Anything that can be achieved shouldn't be called an ideal; that's called a goal. [1:43] Ma Weidu: No matter how you say it, middle-aged folks aren’t comfortable being lectured, unless they’re very close to you. [6:48] Ma Weidu: Chinese people don't think anyone is lower in the social hierarchy. [21:55] 周轶君: 我肯定是凤凰女的自卑,促成了我的成长,绝对是的。

Original transcript

[0:00] I started out as a sycophant, you see. I [0:02] feel that sucking up to people is [0:04] actually a form of self-cultivation. [0:06] >> It's not that, I didn't mean my [0:08] background was actually sycophancy, I [0:10] don't... [0:10] >> You, listen to me, I was speaking a bit [0:12] too fast. What I mean is, years ago, I [0:15] had a very cold face, like a stone mask [0:17] . [0:18] I wouldn't smile when meeting people, so [0:20] many thought I was just judging by [0:22] appearances. [0:24] I didn't think that was good, you know? [0:26] Of course, sometimes when I needed a [0:28] favor, I couldn't bring myself to suck [0:30] up to people; I just couldn't say it. [0:33] >> But later, I noticed that the friends I [0:35] associated with were mostly older people [0:37] , like Brother Ma here. [0:40] Later, I realized that when we ate [0:42] together, I would sometimes ask him, " [0:44] Why does our group always spend time [0:46] praising each other?" [0:48] He gave a very interesting answer. [0:51] He said, "Because we're older and more [0:53] mature, so we only say nice things to [0:55] one another." [0:59] At first, I found it a bit sickening to [1:01] always have to say good things when [1:02] meeting people, but you know, when you [1:04] praise others, this external behavior [1:06] gradually changes your habits. [1:11] It’s human nature. [1:14] >> Once you get used to it, what kind of [1:16] person do you really become? [1:18] Your eyes become very sensitive; you see [1:20] the good in people the moment you meet [1:22] them. [1:23] Xiao Qing has been looking good lately; [1:25] I can’t even see her flaws anymore. [1:28] To me, this is the level of a [1:29] Bodhisattva. It's like a reflex. When I [1:32] see someone, if you ask me to find their [1:34] faults, I have to actually think about [1:36] it. [1:37] My first instinct is to see their good [1:39] side—only their good side—which is a [1:41] form of inner evolution. [1:43] >> I think your mindset is perhaps a bit [1:45] old; I’m still too young. [1:48] I... [1:51] >> I know our social circle is all about [1:52] teasing and poking fun at each other, [1:54] including the friends we meet regularly [1:56] . [2:00] >> Sometimes you come to a meal wondering [2:02] what you did wrong and why you're even [2:04] eating with these people. [2:06] For example, the most common topic at [2:08] our dinners is astrology, like "Taurus [2:10] is great," or "Scorpio is lecherous and [2:13] shameless." Oh, you're a Pisces? Oh, [2:16] Pisces are great, Pisces! The ultimate " [2:19] scum" sign, the elite of the scumbags. [2:23] While other signs win people over with [2:25] virtue, you guys win by lacking it. [2:28] >> An Aries grows a head just to look [2:30] taller. Right, oh my, if you’re an Aries [2:32] , you should find a Scorpio, maybe have [2:35] a "Scaries" child. [2:37] That’s why I finally understand why we [2:38] don't have any young people here. [2:41] >> Is this, is this another approach? It’s [2:43] another approach. Master Ma and his [2:45] group back in the day, they were the [2:46] type who could really heap on the praise [2:48] . [2:48] >> Right, exactly. Deep down, people like [2:50] hearing nice things. [2:52] No matter how you say it, middle-aged [2:54] folks aren’t comfortable being lectured [2:56] , unless they’re very close to you. [2:58] Back then, because we were all writers— [3:00] I have to say, when I was an editor, I [3:02] dealt with writers—writers are generally [3:05] quite proud and aloof. Most writers [3:07] think they’re better than everyone else [3:08] . [3:09] >> Right? [3:10] >> That’s normal. [3:12] >> It’s normal, but it’s actually quite [3:14] abnormal when a bunch of writers are all [3:15] together. [3:17] So what can you do? Just shower each [3:19] other with compliments. [3:20] >> Hmm. [3:21] >> I’ve mentioned this before. Liu Zhenyun [3:22] loved to set traps, specifically for [3:25] Wang Shuo. "Wang, your novels are really [3:27] excellent." Wang would reply, "No, I [3:29] can't write, it’s not good, really not [3:31] good," and move on. [3:33] Every day at lunch—back then we had [3:35] meetings, so we’d eat in the cafeteria— [3:37] and the cafeteria wasn't like today, it [3:39] was just everyone carrying their own [3:41] individual tray. [3:42] The next day, he’d say the same thing. " [3:44] Wang, I truly think your novels are [3:46] great." Wang: "Really, they’re not good [3:48] ." The third day, same thing: "Wang, I [3:51] really mean it, your novels are truly [3:53] well-written." Teacher Liu had another [3:55] secret move. [3:56] >> Hmm. [3:57] >> He’d start by saying, "Little Liu thinks [3:59] you write really well." [4:01] >> That’s so hypocritical. He started using [4:03] other people's names later on. [4:06] >> Then, by the third day, Wang Shuo would [4:08] finally say, "I do think my novels are [4:11] pretty good." [4:13] And I was sitting right there at the [4:14] table. [4:17] Liu Zhenyun would immediately change his [4:19] tune and say to me, "Most people can [4:20] only hold out for three days before they [4:22] fall for the flattery, right?" [4:25] >> Friends were just joking around, but [4:27] that kind of flattery became quite [4:29] vulgar for a while, and eventually, this [4:30] vulgarity turned into a social trend [4:32] where everyone started calling each [4:34] other "Teacher." [4:35] >> Hmm. [4:35] >> Right, isn't that how it is now? [4:37] >> Nowadays everyone calls everyone " [4:38] Teacher." I’m still not used to some [4:40] young girl coming up to me and calling [4:42] me "Teacher" this or that. In terms of [4:44] this social trend, all titles in China [4:46] are becoming mundane and increasingly [4:48] vulgar. I’m really not used to it, [4:50] though I don’t care what people call me [4:51] . Call me teacher if you like, but in [4:53] the past, titles like Mr. Zhang or Mr. [4:55] Li were already honorifics. Why call [4:57] someone teacher? A teacher must have [4:59] something to teach you, and some people [5:01] simply have nothing to offer. [5:04] >> You're talking about...well, "sucking up [5:06] " or "flattering." [5:09] I actually looked into where that term [5:10] came from the other day. [5:13] >> From the Yuan Dynasty. [5:15] >> The Mongols conquered this land and [5:17] established a hierarchy. [5:19] Mongols were first-class citizens, [5:21] Northern Han Chinese were third-class, [5:23] and Southern Han were relegated to the [5:25] fourth class. [5:26] So, they had to curry favor with the [5:28] Mongols. As for the Mongols, they were a [5:31] nomadic people, and a way they expressed [5:33] mutual respect was by patting each [5:34] other’s horses on the rump. [5:37] It was a sign of respect, or rather, it [5:39] was their custom: when you saw someone [5:41] riding a horse, you’d pat the horse’s [5:43] rump and praise it, which was a way of [5:45] praising the rider. [5:46] >> And so, the Han people, who were then [5:49] subjects, wanted to please the Mongols. [5:51] They would just go around, regardless of [5:53] whether you were riding a good horse or [5:55] a bad one, or even a donkey, just pat, [5:56] pat, pat, patting away. So it is said [5:58] that the term "pattng a horse's rump"( [6:00] flattery) originated this way. [6:03] Talking about the etymology, it actually [6:05] has something to do with a certain [6:06] personality of self-abasement and a [6:08] slavish mindset. [6:10] Why is that? Foreigners also value [6:12] praise in their social interactions, but [6:14] I always have the impression that when [6:16] they praise each other, they do so with [6:18] their heads held high. [6:19] >> Hmm. [6:20] >> It feels dignified and confident. [6:23] >> Polite. [6:23] >> Right, very graceful. Why do I always [6:26] feel—look at my spine—I feel my head is [6:28] always leaning forward. [6:31] If you look at me from the side, I’ve [6:33] noticed my spine has been bent for years [6:35] . [6:36] I wonder if it’s related to this? [6:39] That’s how I interpret it. [6:41] >> This is truly an animal instinct, a [6:43] primal nature. [6:44] >> Whoever is authoritative, whoever holds [6:47] the power. [6:48] That’s just an instinct. [6:53] There’s a phenomenon discovered by [6:55] anthropologists: whether a child is [6:57] biological or not—including adopted [6:59] children—they will gradually start to [7:01] look like the male head of the household [7:03] . [7:07] >> Hmm. [7:09] >> This is an evolutionary trait; they [7:11] strive to adapt. [7:14] In the animal kingdom, if you are a [7:16] spotted... [7:19] >> If you are suddenly in our family, for [7:21] instance, if you are different, you will [7:24] be ostracized. [7:27] You will try hard to grow in that [7:28] direction so you won't be killed. [7:31] This is long-term human evolution. Yes, [7:34] and regarding what you said, you have to [7:36] notice people's internal changes. Just [7:38] like I said before, don't think flattery [7:40] is just hypocritical; flattery also [7:42] changes your inner self. [7:43] >> I've seen it too. A leader was [7:45] practicing calligraphy, and it was [7:47] terrible; the brush even tore through [7:48] the paper. Then the secretary said, " [7:50] Wow, excellent, the ink truly penetrates [7:53] the paper!" It’s completely subconscious [7:55] ; they didn't even think about it. It [7:56] was truly subconscious, and they really [7:58] felt it was good. Yeah, they really did [8:01] . Do you think you would, Li Ying? I [8:03] believe they only have feelings for [8:04] themselves. [8:06] That meticulous way of serving is [8:08] different from the relationship between [8:09] leaders and employees we have today. [8:12] That was a servant relationship; this is [8:14] a work relationship. [8:17] And in the old culture, there was a [8:18] complete set of servant culture, which [8:20] we have lost now; it's gone. [8:23] China, first of all, has no caste system [8:25] , unlike India. India's social [8:27] governance is much easier than ours [8:29] because they are divided into four tiers [8:31] . Right, we are like a pancake, always [8:33] one layer. Cities are the same. [8:35] Beijing's traffic is like a pancake, the [8:37] first, second, third, and fourth ring [8:39] roads all nested, so it's very heavy. [8:41] Chinese people don't think anyone is [8:43] lower in the social hierarchy. [8:45] Everyone has this attitude; others [8:47] basically don't have it, but we all do, [8:49] it's called being the masters of the [8:51] house. I was told since I was born to be [8:53] the master of the house, but suddenly [8:55] there were no skills, none at all, so I [8:57] didn't learn. I really don't know how to [8:59] flatter; I've never done it. At first, I [9:02] especially hated cringey words. I felt [9:04] they weren't things humans would say. [9:06] How could they say them? But they could [9:08] say them, and those officials would [9:10] actually accept them. [9:11] >> Mm. [9:12] >> I'm talking about some big officials, [9:14] but they have all been dealt with now, [9:16] so we won't name them. [9:18] Others spoke that way, and I felt it was [9:20] so hypocritical. I thought such flattery [9:22] was very hypocritical, but they didn't [9:24] feel it was. [9:25] >> Right. [9:25] >> They are very used to it, yes. [9:28] >> Mr. Ma just mentioned that this [9:30] hierarchical system was actually [9:31] reasonable for a long time in the past. [9:34] It also led to the past, for example, [9:37] restaurants. The simplest example is [9:39] restaurants. Mm. [9:41] >> Back in the day, the restaurant servers [9:43] . [9:45] >> Right. [9:46] >> The relationship between server and [9:48] guest was a very stable one. [9:51] " [9:51] >> You are here to bring me money." [9:53] >> So, they would serve you from the bottom [9:55] of their hearts. [9:58] >> But after the liberation, that [10:00] relationship changed because they became [10:02] "the masters," which is why in Beijing [10:04] in the 80s, some restaurants even had [10:06] signs saying "No beating customers [10:08] without reason." [10:10] Yes, that actually happened. [10:13] >> And that made it very difficult for the [10:15] industry to survive. [10:20] But now, there's this rural-urban divide [10:22] ; we recruit servers from the [10:24] countryside, they get a salary, they [10:26] know what to do here, they undergo all [10:27] kinds of training—etiquette training and [10:30] more. [10:34] >> And training on local specialties. [10:37] For example, I went to a Shandong [10:39] restaurant. [10:41] Inside, they actually...I only ate there [10:43] once, and they sent me a text: "I'm your [10:45] dedicated server; just look for me next [10:47] time you come or want to book a table." [10:49] Oh, and I later found that this girl was [10:51] just incredibly enthusiastic. Is she [10:53] pretty? [10:54] >> She’s quite pretty. [10:55] >> Is she the type who calls you "big [10:56] brother" to be intimate? [10:58] >> Yes, "Big brother, have you seen this [11:00] today, what's new today..." [11:02] " [11:02] >> What we bought today..." Right. [11:03] >> Yes, people in the north are quite [11:05] outgoing. Hmm. [11:08] >> But, later on, I couldn't go to that [11:10] place anymore, because whether I brought [11:12] a female colleague, a girlfriend, or my [11:14] niece, whenever I went... [11:17] >> Did she call them all "sister-in-law"? [11:19] >> Yes, "sister-in-law." [11:22] >> She would always—it’s not sister-in-law [11:24] , she didn't remember, there was only [11:26] one server. [11:29] >> Which sister-in-law is it today? [11:32] >> In the past, before the liberation... [11:34] >> The restaurant industry really only [11:36] started to flourish after the late Qing [11:38] Dynasty. In a metropolis like Beijing, [11:40] there was a very important role at the [11:41] entrance called the "Liaogao." [11:43] >> It’s actually called "Liaogao," meaning [11:45] to gaze into the distance. [11:48] >> Just one look. " [11:49] >> Boss is here!" They would spot you from [11:51] far away. [11:52] >> The thing is, this "Liaogao" isn't just [11:54] a silver-tongued talker, and it’s not [11:56] just about having high emotional [11:58] intelligence—though that’s surely [12:00] required. [12:02] His most important skill is memory; as [12:04] long as you've been there once, he [12:05] remembers when you came last, and why [12:07] you came. [12:09] He remembers everything. "Boss, your [12:10] grandson's one-month birthday is coming [12:13] up, right? Last time you were here for [12:14] ..." [12:15] " [12:15] >> I’ll help you arrange the full-month [12:17] feast." He’d have it all covered. He [12:19] wouldn't say, if you brought a new [12:21] girlfriend, "Oh, this isn't the same [12:23] person as last time." [12:24] He definitely wouldn't say that. He is [12:26] exceptionally good at speaking, always [12:28] hitting the mark perfectly—positioning [12:30] himself just half a step below you. He [12:32] doesn't lower himself too far, which [12:33] would make you uncomfortable; he stays [12:35] just half a step below. You are the [12:37] master, and he is the servant. These [12:39] high-level people used to earn a lot of [12:41] money because they had a good memory; [12:42] memory can be profitable. [12:44] >> Because he remembers things well, many [12:45] people say. Actually, he might have only [12:47] gone there three times, but he'd say, " [12:49] I own that restaurant, I go there to eat [12:50] all the time." In the past, dining at [12:52] such a restaurant was a big deal, [12:53] especially if you brought guests along. [12:54] See? "Boss Dou is here again!" Hearing [12:56] that makes you happy, doesn't it? Others [12:58] would say, "Where do you always go to [12:59] eat? You must be rich." [13:01] >> Yeah. [13:02] >> He positions all his words perfectly; [13:04] this must be a talent of theirs. [13:06] >> This is high-level flattery. [13:08] >> High-level flattery is undetectable. [13:09] >> It's invisible. Once you can spot it, [13:11] it's no longer effective flattery. [13:12] >> I think it has to do with age. I feel [13:14] like young people today really don't [13:16] seem to know how to do it. [13:20] So I think this high-level flattery is [13:22] still very applicable in today's society [13:24] . [13:25] Sometimes they say it’s a form of [13:27] positive energy, showing that you have [13:29] others in your heart. And honestly, they [13:31] say this isn't stupid at all; it’s [13:33] actually very smart. I once saw one of [13:36] our managers do it. [13:37] We were having dinner with the city [13:39] government. [13:40] I was deeply impressed; I thought it was [13:42] truly a special gift. [13:44] People like that have no reason not to [13:46] be popular. [13:48] We were at a long table for the meeting [13:49] . [13:50] Then came the card exchange—swapping [13:53] cards left and right. [13:55] After the city leaders spoke, it was our [13:57] side's turn. [13:59] He stood up and said, "Respected Mayor [14:01] so-and-so..." [14:03] "... [14:03] >> Secretary so-and-so, Director so-and-so [14:05] ," listing dozens of names. [14:07] >> I've seen this type of person too. [14:09] >> The room just exploded with warm [14:10] applause. It was as if he’d just looked [14:12] at those business cards. [14:13] >> This... [14:14] >> So this really depends on IQ. If you [14:16] have a poor memory, you can't do it. [14:18] >> You know, flattery is like this—it's [14:20] actually a mutually reinforcing culture [14:21] . For example, I don't like to flatter [14:23] others, and I don't like it when others [14:25] flatter me. The moment someone tries, I [14:27] know it immediately. [14:28] >> But there are some who aren't like that [14:29] . I've seen extreme flattery—this boss, [14:32] a big boss, famous on the lists and [14:34] everything. Yeah. [14:35] >> Then he asked to meet me. When he [14:36] invited me over, I went to his hotel [14:38] lobby to wait for him. It was his hotel [14:40] lobby, mind you. It turned out he went [14:42] to the gym. He immediately messaged me, [14:44] "Sorry, I'm working out, I'll be right [14:46] back, just wait in the lobby." I waited [14:48] in the lobby for five minutes, and then [14:49] he walked in. After he came in, he was [14:52] wearing a stylish tracksuit. [14:54] He had an overcoat on. [14:56] As soon as he walked in and saw me, he [14:58] gave his shoulders a shake, and someone [15:00] behind him caught the coat. [15:02] It reminded me of a Stephen Chow movie. [15:04] It was definitely more spectacular than [15:06] a movie. [15:07] >> A shake of the shoulders, and someone [15:08] caught it. If I didn't look behind me, [15:10] if I tried to shake it off without [15:12] looking, it would fall to the ground, [15:13] wouldn't that be embarrassing? [15:16] >> Then, he started talking to me and gave [15:18] a little wave with his hand. [15:22] That guy immediately shoved a lit [15:23] cigarette into his hand. [15:26] >> He took a puff and talked to me, but [15:28] what was he saying? It was like a scene [15:30] straight out of a TV show. [15:32] >> It must have been rehearsed. [15:34] He said, "Chinese people just exercise [15:36] blindly; I hire American trainers." [15:40] He took a puff, and the person behind [15:42] him snatched the cigarette away. [15:45] Just as his hand hung there, another [15:47] person tapped it, and a fresh one was [15:49] stuck back in. [15:51] I was so amused that day. [15:53] I was about to burst out laughing. [15:55] He didn't know what I was laughing at. [15:58] All their movements were perfectly [16:00] rehearsed; that person was completely [16:02] focused on sucking up to him. [16:04] Otherwise, if he gestured like that, you [16:06] have to know if he wants another puff. [16:08] If you took it away prematurely, he'd [16:10] know; they knew everything. [16:11] >> Yeah. [16:13] Then there was a dedicated elevator. [16:15] The elevator in the lobby was kept empty [16:17] , with someone standing there waiting. [16:20] Once he went up, there was tea and [16:22] everything else. [16:24] Every single movement was perfectly [16:25] timed and rhythmic in its sycophancy. [16:27] The whole process—I was genuinely [16:29] impressed. I went back and tried it with [16:32] my own coat, but it's not that easy. You [16:34] see, you have to use your shoulders to [16:35] shake it off. If you don't do it right, [16:38] it won't come off. You can flail around [16:40] for ages and the coat is still on you, [16:41] you know? He just enjoys this; he enjoys [16:44] it. Do you think he even cares if it's [16:46] real or fake? [16:47] He probably just likes the style. [16:49] >> Right. [16:50] >> But even if you wanted to defend against [16:52] it, you might not be able to. [16:54] The story Teacher Ma just told, actually [16:56] , the biggest figure in the foodie world [16:58] like that was Yuan Mei. [17:00] >> In*Yanshi Dan*, he was going to the [17:01] south to take up an official post and [17:03] went to bid his teacher farewell. The [17:05] teacher asked, "What have you prepared? [17:07] " He replied, "I've prepared 100 tall [17:09] hats (flattery)." The teacher said, " [17:11] That's not good, is it?" He said, " [17:13] These days, who doesn't like wearing a [17:15] tall hat? Everyone likes to hear a few [17:18] nice words." Then they say, how many can [17:20] be like you, teacher? [17:23] Oh, haha, when I went out, I told my [17:25] attendant, "Hm, why are there only 99 [17:27] left?" [17:29] You see, this is why I think flattery is [17:31] a high-IQ job. [17:34] Because, you know, leaders aren't stupid [17:36] ; they know you're sucking up to them, [17:38] but actually, I think to a large extent [17:40] . [17:42] They are amazed by your talent. For [17:43] example, they tell this story about Ji [17:45] Xiaolan and Emperor Qianlong's 50th [17:47] birthday. "I'm also 50, 50," the Emperor [17:50] said, "Ji Lan, write a couplet." He [17:53] blurted out, "The Imperial domain spans [17:55] forty thousand miles." [17:59] That is to say, the territory of the [18:01] Qing Dynasty spans forty thousand miles [18:03] , "Since ancient times, no dynasty has [18:05] ever unified forty thousand miles, and [18:08] for your 50th birthday, may you have [18:10] another 9950." [18:15] Years. [18:17] >> Ten thousand years. [18:18] >> Forty thousand miles. I mean, you know [18:20] he's flattering. Hmm. [18:22] >> But the level is just too high. [18:26] >> These stories, after being embellished [18:28] by later scholars, have multiplied. [18:30] >> Each one is more impressive, flattery at [18:32] its finest. Sir, what you just said is [18:35] also a question; why do I feel like, uh [18:37] , it's not me? I, I might be bragging, [18:39] but I always feel that if someone [18:41] praises me, I feel uneasy; that's not it [18:43] . Is it because of our inherent sense of [18:45] inferiority? [18:47] Like, for instance, if we're eating [18:48] together and someone says, "Hey, I watch [18:51] your show often." I seem to [18:52] instinctively want to change the subject [18:54] . [18:55] But some people really enjoy it; why do [18:57] I feel so embarrassed? [18:59] It feels like I can't handle it. No, [19:00] it's the same for me. I don't really [19:02] like talking about my own show either. [19:05] Since we're finally together, talking [19:06] about that—because we know the show has [19:08] various issues, and you know clearly. [19:10] Which conversation was good, which was [19:13] bad. [19:13] When people talk to you about it, it's [19:15] actually a professional matter, not [19:17] flattery; it's just a...Otherwise, when [19:19] I'm sitting with someone, how should I [19:21] respond? I usually only see them through [19:24] a screen, like, wait for some topic or [19:26] another, right? It's awkward. Why do you [19:28] say it's not bad? Your show is unique, [19:30] and you are also unique, so it's not bad [19:32] to talk about it. Some people get it [19:34] wrong; they talk for a long time and end [19:36] up talking about a different actor, you [19:38] know? That's it. [19:40] So now, when I run into actresses, [19:42] sometimes they say, "Master Ma, do you [19:44] still remember me?" I said I remember, [19:46] you really remember, but I actually [19:48] don't remember at all, because actresses [19:50] are especially hard to tell apart. Right [19:51] , if you just blurt it out, you're bound [19:53] to be wrong, and then you can't be a [19:55] nice guy anymore. [19:55] >> Fumbling to correct yourself is [19:57] definitely a form of flattering the [19:58] wrong person. [20:00] >> One time during a livestream, I was [20:02] presenting an award with that actor, and [20:04] while I was on air, I said, "I really [20:05] loved your performance as Yongzheng," [20:07] but he didn't play that role. [20:10] >> What did he play? [20:11] Was it Kangxi? [20:12] >> Oh right, he said, "I played Kangxi." It [20:15] was so awkward. I also often run into [20:17] people who say, "Oh, Mr. Fang Zhou, you [20:19] can both expose frauds and write, that's [20:21] great." You’re both a fighter and a... [20:22] >> Let me tell you, what you said reminds [20:24] me of something. Did you see that Jacky [20:26] Cheung concert clip going around on [20:27] social media lately? [20:28] >> Jacky Cheung was performing somewhere, [20:30] twisting and turning, and you could hear [20:32] the audience next to him shouting, " [20:33] Andy Lau!" Exactly. That’s one. [20:36] Another one I heard in Shanghai was [20:38] about David Wu. [20:41] He opened a bar there, and a little girl [20:43] walked in, saw him, and went right up to [20:45] him saying, "Ng Man-tat!" [20:48] >> Right, right, that happens all the time [20:50] . So for actors, when you aren't really [20:51] close, it's best to just say, "You're [20:53] great," and don't use their names or [20:55] talk about their work; it's very easy to [20:56] mess up and end up flattering the wrong [20:58] person. [20:58] >> Doesn't Huang Bo tell a story like that [21:00] himself? People talk to him for a long [21:02] time, and in the end, they ask for an [21:04] autograph, perhaps confusing him with [21:05] Wang Baoqiang in the middle of the [21:07] conversation, and he’s forced to sign as [21:09] Wang Baoqiang. [21:10] >> That’s very common. [21:12] >> It actually happened at the airport; [21:14] someone stopped him and said... [21:16] " [21:17] >> Mr. Lu Yu, I love you so much." And so [21:19] Mr. Chen just signed "Yu" for them. [21:24] I once, I once happened to be sitting [21:25] right next to Mr. Jiang Kun on a flight [21:28] . [21:29] We were quite fated to be together; we [21:31] sat and chatted the whole way. In the [21:33] end, someone came up to greet me first, [21:35] and at least they didn't get it wrong. " [21:38] Hey!""Teacher Dao, I watch your show. [21:40] Teacher Ma, you're here too!" Jiang is [21:43] very humorous, isn't he? Teacher Ma, you [21:46] fly often. [21:47] So, this art of flattery really is a [21:49] necessity, isn't it? [21:51] No, it isn't. It's about sincere [21:54] flattery. [21:54] >> Hmm. [21:55] >> Hey, Ma Ye, let me ask you a question. [21:58] >> I think all four of us should answer [22:00] this. [22:01] >> At your current age—40, 60, or 80— [22:07] Hey, at your age, have you ever [22:09] reflected on whether many of your [22:10] strengths and perceived shortcomings [22:12] today are related to your family [22:14] background? [22:17] Have you pondered that? [22:19] >> I'm certain the sense of inferiority [22:21] from being a "phoenix girl" drove my [22:23] growth. Yes, definitely. [22:25] >> The flower of Hubei. [22:27] It’s this constant atmosphere of wanting [22:29] to break free from one's current [22:31] environment. I’m actually from a railway [22:33] family. My dad was an engineer and my [22:35] mom was a teacher at a railway school, [22:37] so effectively, I’m a railway kid too. [22:39] Yes, basically, definitely so. But there [22:42] was this atmosphere of "losers" in the [22:44] railway community—I don't mean that in a [22:46] derogatory way, just that everyone felt [22:48] their destiny was already fixed. [22:51] So, I was someone who wanted to escape [22:52] that environment. [22:54] So you often say you have a [22:56] people-pleasing personality, where you [22:57] involuntarily want to make others happy [22:59] when you meet them. [23:00] >> Right, that includes when you were young [23:02] — [23:02] >> You feel it’s related to that sense of [23:04] inferiority from a small town. Actually [23:06] , when you just mentioned seeing those [23:07] fancy clothes, it reminded me of when I [23:09] was about 11 or 12, going to a wealthy [23:11] relative's home in Guangzhou to pick [23:13] through the clothes the older sister [23:15] didn't want. And my great-aunt was the [23:16] one who arranged for me to pick the [23:18] clothes. Because she was hard of hearing [23:19] , her voice was very loud, saying, "Go [23:21] ahead! Dig through them! Dig through [23:23] them to your heart's content!" At that [23:25] moment, I felt so miserable. [23:27] That was probably the moment I clearly [23:29] realized I was from a small city, and [23:31] seeing those fancy clothes—That sense of [23:33] inferiority, I think that was perhaps [23:35] one of the most profound memories. [23:37] >> Look, Ma Ye, if you look at the four of [23:40] us, I always feel we two belong to the [23:42] commoner class, while you two come from [23:44] the new China nobility. No, I don't, I’m [23:47] not. [23:48] >> How are you not? You’re from an Air [23:49] Force compound. The compound was an Air [23:51] Force compound. [23:52] Yes, back then, the atmosphere of his [23:54] upbringing was unique to that place [23:56] because the nation had just been founded [23:58] . In our childhood, every dynasty—...is [24:01] the same. It's the same in any country, [24:02] because political power is seized [24:04] through battle. Power cannot be [24:05] negotiated or bought; it is fought for. [24:07] The power that is seized is held by the [24:09] first generation: the military. Every [24:11] dynasty is the same; they always hold a [24:13] ......higher status. Take Zhao Kuangyin [24:15] for example. After Zhao Kuangyin [24:16] conquered the world, he used the "cup of [24:18] wine to release military power" strategy [24:20] , and everyone lived well, as long as [24:22] that power of mine disappeared. So, in [24:24] the 50s and 60s of the last century, [24:26] when we were growing up, the military [24:28] received much better treatment than the [24:30] local areas; at the very least, we never [24:32] went hungry and there was always enough [24:34] to eat. [24:36] That's why I get the feeling that you [24:38] all grew up in Beijing. Take me, for [24:40] instance; I’m from Shijiazhuang, what [24:42] they call the "Number One Zhuang under [24:44] Heaven." [24:45] I sometimes feel that, of course, using [24:47] any region to define a person is [24:48] something you could refute, and it’s not [24:50] exactly scientific. [24:52] But why do people love to chat so much [24:54] about "Where are you from?""Where are [24:56] you from, and where am I from?" [24:59] For example, when I chat with them, I [25:01] feel that people from Hebei, or us folks [25:03] from Shijiazhuang, have a certain humble [25:05] outlook on life deep down in our bones. [25:09] >> Yeah. [25:10] >> Humility, really. [25:14] Why is it that, when you see a group of [25:15] people, I feel like us Hebei people [25:17] don't really like to show off our [25:19] personalities; we prefer to keep a check [25:21] on ourselves. [25:25] On the contrary, take that recent [25:27] incident with Aunt Qiong Yang; because [25:28] of that business with her husband, she [25:30] made sure the whole society knew about [25:32] it. [25:35] I realized back then that there’s a [25:36] certain type of person who, if you ask [25:38] me, has this sense of being a " [25:40] character," or a sense of being the [25:41] center of attention. [25:45] People like me, with my background, if I [25:47] ever lose my temper, I think, "Oh, [25:49] goodness," because everyone in society [25:51] has their ups and downs, so what right [25:53] do I have to take up others 'time or [25:55] force my personal affairs onto the whole [25:58] of society? [26:02] I sometimes notice that some celebrities [26:04] have this tendency to act like they’re [26:06] throwing a tantrum in front of the [26:08] public—for instance, if they’re unhappy [26:10] , they’ll just start cursing everyone [26:12] out, acting as if... [26:14] >> They need people to coddle them. So, you [26:16] mean to say you can’t name names of [26:18] these celebrities? [26:19] >> No, I can't name names, but I can... [26:21] >> I still can't quite figure out what kind [26:22] of situation that is. I can't name names [26:24] , but I can point to their backgrounds. [26:26] I later discovered, based on incomplete [26:28] statistics, that those who have this " [26:30] character" or "center of attention" [26:31] complex, or who aren't refined or [26:33] disciplined at all, will just go out and [26:35] shout and scream, right? They’ll go [26:37] around cursing everyone out, and think [26:39] the whole of society has to cater to [26:40] them, right? [26:41] Hey, I’ve noticed that people like this [26:44] usually grew up in Beijing, maybe even [26:45] having a family background like Kelan's [26:47] . [26:49] Really? [26:50] >> Don't say you have it too. [26:51] >> When did I ever have it? [26:53] >> Let’s not beat around the bush, let’s [26:55] speak directly. [26:56] >> Good question, well asked. No, you’re [26:59] actually more open-minded. [27:00] >> What I want to say is, people keep [27:02] bringing up background; background [27:04] shouldn't be an excuse for a person, an [27:06] excuse on the path of growth. If you [27:08] want to talk about backgrounds from that [27:10] era, it was all collective ownership, [27:11] and Ma should be very clear about this. [27:13] >> No, I've never claimed that. [27:15] Back in those days, what was considered [27:17] corruption or bribery? Every tea table, [27:20] stool, and bed in the house, [27:22] >> was all public property; you had no [27:24] private assets. At the same time, your [27:26] salary was indeed high, grandparents had [27:29] high salaries, but they had many people [27:31] to support. [27:31] >> So, do you... [27:33] >> Supporting several big families? [27:34] >> It was all public, so do you think this [27:36] society now also belongs to your family [27:38] ? [27:38] >> It's also public. [27:41] Uh, I’d love that, but the Chinese [27:43] feudal system has ended, so this is [27:45] simply impossible. [27:48] Let me analyze you; you’re not the type [27:50] who wants to let the whole world know [27:52] about your business, but I can still see [27:54] some personality traits from your family [27:55] background. [27:58] Kelan, this personality can sometimes [28:00] easily offend people, you know? [28:02] Especially Chinese people, who might [28:04] wonder why this woman acts like a hero, [28:06] or is so well-liked, [28:08] >> it’s just very rigid, like that. [28:11] >> I think people just feel that this [28:13] background becomes an excuse during the [28:15] growth process. [28:17] But in reality, background only reflects [28:19] a family's upbringing. [28:21] Not everyone's background dictates the [28:23] shape of their personality; it’s not [28:25] like that, everyone’s personality is [28:27] different. [28:29] For example, looking at my grandfather [28:31] enduring so many blows, it taught me [28:33] that nothing really counts. [28:37] Regardless of what you did before, if [28:38] they say you’re good today, you’re good [28:40] ; if they say you’re bad tomorrow, [28:42] you’re bad. [28:45] If the sky falls, you have to rely on [28:46] your own backbone to hold it up; that’s [28:48] what it means to be an upright person. [28:52] This has nothing to do with whether your [28:53] background was impoverished or not. [28:56] Instead, you keep your desires low. [28:59] >> Right, those are two separate issues. [29:02] The first issue is the influence of [29:04] environment; your background, good or [29:06] bad, plays a role. [29:09] Another issue we are particularly [29:11] cautious about is innate factors—what we [29:13] call personality. [29:15] Personality is innate and hereditary. [29:17] Many people don't believe it when we say [29:19] personality is hereditary. I’ll give you [29:22] a benchmark, and you'll believe it. It’s [29:23] hard to discuss when it comes to humans [29:25] , because people think human factors are [29:27] mostly acquired, but that’s not [29:29] necessarily the case. [29:30] International kennel clubs have a [29:32] definition for purebred dogs. [29:36] Aside from physical height and weight [29:38] for males and females, the most [29:40] important indicator is temperament. [29:44] A dog cannot mutate for three [29:45] generations. For instance, take a [29:48] bulldog; the more you provoke it, the [29:50] more aggressive it becomes. That’s its [29:52] personality; you can't change it. A good [29:54] environment won't make it any less [29:55] aggressive. [29:57] >> Then there are dogs that bark, but if [29:59] you poke them, they retreat. [30:01] That’s also their personality, and it [30:03] determines if they can be listed by the [30:05] World Kennel Club. [30:06] And both dogs and humans are living [30:08] beings. [30:09] >> You’re looking at humans through the [30:11] lens of a dog. [30:12] When we talk about this personality, [30:14] people often say someone is very similar [30:16] to their grandmother. [30:17] This is personality; there must be [30:19] something internal being passed down. [30:21] >> However, this transmission is modified [30:23] because humans can change a lot [30:24] throughout their lives and are [30:25] restrained by culture. For example, if [30:27] you keep hitting walls, your personality [30:29] will become more reserved, right? If you [30:30] never have the opportunity to hit a wall [30:32] in your environment, your personality [30:34] remains your own. Our personalities have [30:35] all been modified. Does the "Lao Pao" [30:37] archetype belong to that mindset? " [30:39] >> Lao Pao" is "Lao Pao"; that movie really [30:41] took things in a different direction. Is [30:43] that right? [30:45] "Lao Pao" is like this: historically, [30:47] the term didn't just refer to people [30:49] born and raised in Beijing. [30:52] It often referred to those with a [30:54] military compound background or those [30:56] with a very strong sense of cultural [30:57] self. [30:58] The strongest concept behind these "Lao [31:00] Pao" types is doing things without [31:02] calculating the cost; that is the [31:04] essence of a "Lao Pao." Hmm. [31:06] >> The reason the "Lao Pao" spirit and the [31:08] film became so popular later is that it [31:10] highlighted this essence of doing things [31:12] without counting the cost. Today, the [31:14] first thing we do is calculate costs: " [31:16] Is this worth my time?"" [31:17] >> Is it worth risking everything for my [31:19] brother?" [31:19] >> Hmm. [31:20] >> Whenever we do something, they have to [31:21] calculate the cost. If it takes me half [31:23] a day to do some crappy task, I just [31:24] won't do it. [31:25] >> After all the calculating, it still ends [31:27] up betraying one's brothers. [31:28] >> So if we really must talk about one's [31:30] background today, let's think about " [31:31] old-timers"—it actually has nothing to [31:32] do with birth, but rather your [31:34] perspective. It has to do with your life [31:35] experiences. [31:36] >> So, does one's background influence [31:38] perspective and experience? I think [31:39] family upbringing has a huge impact. [31:42] For example, my grandmother told me from [31:44] a young age that this is a [31:45] male-dominated society. [31:48] As a woman, as a girl, I was the first [31:50] child in our extended family, but I was [31:52] unlucky enough to be a girl. [31:54] My grandma said I had to study. [31:57] Since I wasn't pretty, studying was the [31:59] only way—I worked very hard later on, [32:01] extremely hard. [32:03] >> Compared to my beautiful mother, I was [32:05] under a lot of pressure, and my grandma [32:06] would say that only reading could keep [32:08] me from being lonely. You realize that [32:10] what happens when you’re little—think [32:12] about it, the first time I ever wanted [32:13] to die was when I couldn't finish my [32:15] winter or summer homework in elementary [32:17] school, maybe first grade; I just wanted [32:18] to die then. [32:19] >> Oh, that was really my grandma's wisdom [32:21] . Looking back now, how ridiculous it [32:23] all was! But every time I felt like [32:25] dying, moved to tears by my own drama, [32:27] someone would throw a book at me. [32:29] You’d read it and realize that all those [32:31] historical figures didn't die, so why [32:33] should I? I’m still young and beautiful [32:35] ! [32:35] >> Mm. [32:36] >> I think this is very important—family [32:38] upbringing. [32:40] You’ll come to realize that, in fact, [32:42] every Chinese family is essentially a [32:44] history of blood and tears. [32:47] If you really understand what your [32:49] family has gone through during its [32:51] development, when you look back and [32:52] constantly verify your life experiences [32:54] , you realize none of this is a big deal [32:56] ; no matter how many hardships come, [32:58] they’re just nothing. [33:02] You know, there was a while where a [33:04] popular article written by someone [33:05] working in human resources at a company [33:07] went viral online. Was it "Is it hard [33:09] for kids from poor families to succeed? [33:11] " They said a group of interns came to [33:13] their bank, but in the end, only two [33:15] could be kept. [33:16] Then their colleague said, "Watch this, [33:18] I'll tell you who's from a rural [33:19] background, who's from a cadre family, [33:21] and who's from an intellectual family." [33:23] They said they were almost always right [33:25] . [33:26] Take a simple example: the second day of [33:28] work, the kid from the countryside [33:30] arrived the earliest. [33:31] Even though he was the first to arrive, [33:33] he didn't know how to socialize and [33:35] wouldn't even greet people. [33:36] >> But children from official families [33:38] often arrive and say, "Oh, you must be [33:40] tired, let me pour you some water." [33:43] They know how to handle things, whereas [33:44] the ones who are a bit annoying are [33:46] actually children from intellectual [33:48] families, who seem a bit haughty and [33:49] don't really cooperate with others. [33:52] You see, doesn't this show that these [33:54] things are related to them and their [33:55] upbringing? [33:57] >> So why isn't the focus on the family [33:59] background instead of social origin? [34:01] I feel that the reason someone like Qi [34:03] Tongwei can get so much sympathy is [34:04] because of their family upbringing. He [34:06] has absolutely no sense of awe, no sense [34:08] of shame. Even if the background is the [34:10] same, why would you be so hypocritical, [34:12] pretending to be from a humble [34:14] background? Where is there such a " [34:16] humble" background like yours? And Fang [34:18] Zhou... [34:18] >> It's not about the relationship between [34:20] Fang Zhou and his mother. I read an [34:21] article by Fang Zhou; this is not [34:23] ordinary. What do you call this "humble [34:25] " background? It's intellectuals. [34:27] Only the daughter of a woman with great [34:29] insight and an independent personality [34:31] could have such a personal development. [34:33] Then that just means your father married [34:35] above his station, and your mother [34:37] married below hers, right? No. [34:38] >> Yes, I really think it's a matter of [34:40] family upbringing. It's that from a [34:42] young age, he knew he and his mother [34:44] were best friends; he could discuss [34:46] anything with her, so if his mom checked [34:48] his phone, he felt it was normal and [34:49] fine. I should let my mother know what a [34:51] wonderful family this is. [34:52] >> It's that he has fewer secrets; if he [34:54] had many secrets, he wouldn't let her [34:55] see it either. [34:56] >> He has secrets, he definitely has [34:57] secrets, but the question is, what is [34:58] this called? [34:59] >> My father is no longer with us, but my [35:01] mother still is. Since she's still [35:03] around and doesn't watch the show, I can [35:05] say whatever I want; I can say anything [35:06] . [35:07] >> I'll just send bags over to her. [35:10] >> My father was the person who took care [35:12] of me my whole life. Down to every [35:14] single detail. Since I was little, my [35:16] mother wouldn't wear shoes made in [35:18] Beijing, even though she was from [35:19] Beijing. [35:20] She wouldn't wear them; she would only [35:22] wear shoes from Shanghai or Guangzhou. [35:24] That was extremely picky for that era. [35:27] Since she was a child, she liked eating [35:29] chocolate and things we all considered [35:31] luxury foods, because she was a spoiled [35:33] young lady. [35:35] >> And then, looking into my mother's [35:37] family history—My mother's family goes [35:39] back five generations as major merchants [35:41] in Lijin, Shandong. [35:44] They were the wealthiest in the county [35:46] for five consecutive generations [35:48] starting from the Daoguang period, so [35:50] later I could understand why my mother [35:52] had so many habits...you know, where [35:54] those quirks came from. [35:56] They were all bourgeois habits. [35:58] >> I, on the other hand, am not picky about [36:00] anything. I wouldn't eat anything with a [36:02] strong flavor. By the time I left home [36:04] for the countryside, I had to learn to [36:06] eat scallions, ginger, garlic, beef, and [36:08] mutton—I had to eat everything, because [36:09] my family had nothing. He didn't know; [36:11] he wouldn't touch anything with any kind [36:13] of strong flavor. Is the heat at your [36:15] place not great? Not great, how is the [36:17] heat? [36:17] >> It's no good, there's no wine or [36:19] anything prepared here. [36:20] >> But things were different on my father's [36:22] side. [36:24] My great-grandfather lost both his [36:26] parents by age six, becoming an orphan [36:28] by twelve. [36:30] Going to sea meant death; it was the [36:32] most dangerous job, with a mortality [36:34] rate for fishermen second only to miners [36:36] . [36:38] >> At that time, the southeast coast had [36:40] this...one benefit, because you were [36:42] literally betting your life. When [36:44] everyone went out to sea, there were no [36:46] companies, only shares; if you went, you [36:48] had a share, because you were [36:49] contributing your life as capital. As a [36:51] result, they slowly started to prosper. [36:54] After my great-grandfather made his [36:56] fortune, he had my father educated; my [36:58] father was his eldest grandson. [37:00] The eldest son of the eldest son, my [37:02] father was the first in our family to [37:04] study. That’s how I eventually came to [37:06] be, but what was the benefit of his [37:08] education? Thirty-nine of them went out [37:09] together to join the army, through the [37:11] War of Resistance and the War of [37:12] Liberation. He was in famous battles, [37:14] wasn't he? Everyone knows the [37:15] Menglianggu Campaign, then the Jinan [37:17] Campaign, the Huai-Hai Campaign, the [37:18] Crossing the Yangtze, and the Shanghai [37:20] Campaign—he fought all the way through [37:21] and survived. Why did he survive? [37:23] Because he had an education. Educated [37:25] people are more likely to survive until [37:27] the end; aren't wise soldiers brave? [37:29] Just charging blindly—your life is left [37:31] to chance. [37:32] >> They kept charging, they kept charging, [37:34] there had to be a reason for that. Sorry [37:36] , my... [37:36] >> Getting off track, getting off track. [37:38] >> It’s not just off track; at the very [37:39] least, you have to look before you leap [37:41] , right? [37:41] >> You need time to judge the situation. [37:43] >> Yes, exactly. We won because of the [37:45] whole picture; without these wise [37:46] soldiers, we couldn't have won. [37:47] >> It all comes down to foresight. [37:48] >> Yes, exactly. So look at these two [37:51] families: one was an orphan. Later, I [37:53] made a film; why was it placed at the [37:55] end when it was broadcast? [37:57] Because I talked about someone who was a [37:59] third-generation pauper and eventually [38:01] an orphan, and then this other family— [38:03] my father's family—versus my mother's, [38:05] which had been the wealthiest for years [38:07] . [38:09] How could those two ever meet? If they [38:11] hadn't collided, I wouldn't exist, right [38:13] ? What looks like the coincidence of a [38:14] single family is the inevitability of a [38:16] century of Chinese history. It’s like [38:18] what you just said, every household goes [38:20] through this, and [38:21] >> Every household. And what you’re saying [38:23] about this, this century-long [38:25] inevitability, what is it? You really [38:27] have seen it, speaking of the last [38:28] hundred years in China, your parents' [38:30] generation, your ancestors [38:31] >> The process of reshuffling, turning [38:33] everything upside down, look at your [38:35] grandfather, [38:36] >> Actually, it’s not just everyone, all of [38:38] us, every one of us is like this. [38:40] Your grandfather was a revolutionary, [38:42] your grandmother was from a wealthy, [38:44] well-to-do family. [38:46] You see, in the old days, this would [38:48] never have happened. [38:49] >> You wouldn't even have met each other. [38:51] Right, it used to be about matching [38:52] social status, but this reshuffling—but [38:54] let me tell you, Master Ma, even when [38:56] you say this, I feel your background is [38:58] better than mine, really, it isn't. [39:00] >> I tell you, Dong, you’re sounding more [39:03] and more reactionary. [39:05] You keep going back to Hebei; that’s the [39:08] problem with Hebei—it exists just to set [39:10] off Beijing. [39:12] That’s right, and that determines our [39:14] sense of inferiority, you know? [39:16] It’s always been under Beijing’s shadow [39:18] , hasn't it? [39:20] I think Ke is right too; it's mostly [39:22] that, for instance, kids growing up in [39:24] Beijing might genuinely have a broader [39:26] perspective, right? [39:29] And for example, with the friends I hang [39:31] out with now, I’ve noticed they have [39:33] this subtle, imperceptible sense of [39:34] superiority. [39:36] Where does this superiority show? It [39:38] shows in their uninhibited nature. Just [39:40] look, when we people from Hebei chat, [39:42] including me and Fang Zhou, when we talk [39:44] , there’s always a [39:46] >> Why do you think I’m the host? [39:47] >> Can you stop dragging Fang Zhou into [39:49] this? Fang Zhou is like a little bird [39:51] ... [39:51] >> This is where you can tell—he needs to [39:53] pull in an ally to have any confidence. [39:55] That’s why, look, I’m the host, and a [39:57] host is supposed to be accompanying [39:59] others in conversation. [40:00] >> I don't feel like you’re accompanying us [40:02] ; I feel like we’re all accompanying you [40:04] . Why, I later realized that my friends [40:06] here in Beijing, when you really think [40:08] about it, are like Master Ma. [40:10] They feel that even if they were [40:12] miserable back then—listen, this is also [40:14] a story— [40:15] >> Whether they were in the Propaganda [40:17] Department, or, oh, you were in the [40:19] Fourth Field Army, or this or that. You [40:21] have to realize, back in our hometown, I [40:23] think, Master Ma, you can trace back [40:25] your ancestors and your grandfather, but [40:27] our family’s ancestral graves are all [40:29] gone. I asked my dad the other day, " [40:31] It's Qingming Festival, no wonder we [40:33] never get rich, where are our ancestral [40:35] graves?" My dad said, "As for the land, [40:37] who knows when the village fields might [40:39] be leveled, and they wouldn't even tell [40:41] us." [40:42] It really is a silent catastrophe; we [40:44] simply had no idea. [40:48] And you see, my parents were both [40:49] farmers, both from the countryside, and [40:51] I discovered that deep down, they have [40:53] this stoicism, or perhaps a way of [40:55] making heavy burdens seem light. [41:00] I even have a very interesting memory of [41:02] this. [41:04] Back then, I just felt that Beijing kids [41:06] lived with such self-respect. [41:10] When I was young, breakdancing was [41:12] incredibly popular. [41:14] There was a national breakdancing [41:15] competition. I had never been to Beijing [41:18] , and that was my first impression of [41:20] Beijing kids. [41:21] Do you know what that impression was? It [41:23] was a national breakdancing competition [41:25] , a breakdancing contest. [41:27] The whole arena knew there was something [41:29] crooked going on; the judges clearly had [41:31] a dark agenda. [41:33] Everyone could see it. [41:37] But I noticed that our Hebei team, along [41:39] with the others, knew it was unfair, yet [41:40] they just took it. [41:44] >> They swallowed their anger, finished [41:46] performing, and left. I remember four or [41:48] five guys from Beijing came up last; [41:50] they had probably planned it. They [41:52] danced incredibly well, and as the last [41:54] one finished with a dramatic flair, one [41:56] guy just shrugged his shoulder and said [41:58] , "Screw this, let's go." They walked [42:00] off right then and there. [42:02] For a kid from Shijiazhuang, I thought, [42:05] "Wow, Beijingers really are fearless, [42:07] they just refuse to play along," you [42:09] know? [42:12] I felt like they could just live that [42:14] way, following their impulses, [42:15] free-spirited, while we seemed bound to [42:17] follow all the rules. [42:21] I think there's another reason for what [42:22] you're describing. [42:25] This so-called indulgence is really just [42:27] a lack of shame in occupying public [42:29] resources. [42:30] They’ve been doing it since they were [42:32] kids. [42:33] >> No, what I mean is, actually... [42:35] >> Let him finish. Actually, what I'm [42:36] saying is, including the HR you [42:38] mentioned, who serves tea and water so [42:40] sweetly, they are also utilizing public [42:42] resources in the same way. [42:44] It’s because when they are serving tea [42:46] and water, all the focus is on them. [42:49] They have no shame in being exposed to [42:51] everyone, making everyone revolve around [42:53] them, including talking about their own [42:55] affairs in public discourse, but I think [42:57] that’s just you people from small places [42:59] . [43:00] >> We were also the first to sign a deal. [43:03] Right, it's actually about feeling [43:04] embarrassed to occupy public resources, [43:06] so I pull back, thinking that my own [43:08] matters and emotions shouldn't burden [43:10] too many people. [43:12] I don't quite understand it, but in [43:14] today's society, everyone seems quite [43:16] relaxed about it. [43:18] But for example, why do I always feel [43:20] that, say, if you want to tell the [43:22] public about your own business, it's [43:23] something I’ve felt since I was little— [43:25] like, "Oh, what right do I have to make [43:27] people listen to my business?" [43:30] But compared to that, you see some [43:31] people who are so expressive, and you [43:33] actually admire them; they feel their [43:35] personal matters are of the utmost [43:36] importance, right? [43:39] Hey, they complain about me, or talk [43:41] about how their wife this or their [43:42] husband that; why do they have this [43:44] feeling that the whole society is...let [43:46] me put it more practically. [43:50] >> Among the four of us sitting here, who [43:52] has the most assets? It must be you. [43:54] >> My assets are you guys; I only have the [43:56] assets of the show. [43:59] >> I remember very clearly, when I was 20, [44:01] I joined Channel V. My mom watched us [44:03] kids scrambling around, and she said [44:05] very calmly, "None of you kids will ever [44:07] become big stars, why?" [44:12] "Because you all just seek pleasure, and [44:13] you have no grand ambitions because [44:15] you're all lost souls." [44:19] Each and every one of us grew up in our [44:20] own families, or like us, it might sound [44:22] like we belong to a privileged class, [44:24] but where is that really? [44:27] Okay, we don't have grand ambitions; why [44:30] are we lost souls? Because I don't want [44:32] them, I don't have the competitive [44:34] ability, so you see the ones doing best [44:35] now are the old-school bunch from*Qiang [44:37] Qiang San Ren Xing*. [44:38] >> Because what was our family background [44:40] classified as back then? [44:43] >> Regardless of background, you can't deny [44:45] that you have a vanity driven by the [44:47] need to promote economic prosperity and [44:49] cultural progress, which pushes you step [44:51] by step, and I'm just here scolding you [44:53] . [44:58] >> I'm not scolding anyone; if you insist [45:00] on dividing it that way, that is exactly [45:02] what I wanted to say. [45:05] >> He's still very sensitive; actually, [45:06] before he even said that, that was [45:08] exactly what I wanted to talk about. [45:10] You're only talking about phenomena; [45:11] what about our results? [45:12] >> Results, yes, look at the results. [45:14] >> See, the results have emerged, you see? [45:17] You do have competitive ability, [45:19] competitive ability. Let me tell you, I [45:21] participated... [45:21] >> It's emerged, too, a famous female [45:24] writer. [45:24] >> Don't always dwell on that; actually, [45:26] you two, I once participated in an event [45:28] . That event was a huge eye-opener for [45:31] me. People dragged me along; I didn’t [45:33] know what for. [45:34] Later I said I wouldn't go, but they [45:36] said, "Come on, they’re all descendants [45:38] of the founding fathers." [45:40] >> Uh-huh. So, I went that day—let’s not [45:42] name names, it’s not nice—everyone was a [45:44] descendant of a founding father. Whose [45:46] son, whose daughter...some really looked [45:49] the part. They said a boss from Hebei’s [45:51] coal mines was hosting. [45:52] I thought it was actually the founding [45:54] fathers or people like that. [45:56] I got there, and this guy was just [45:58] sitting there. [45:59] I thought he was someone from He Long’s [46:01] family. [46:04] >> Turns out the host was just some coal [46:06] mine boss from Hebei. [46:09] Give me a break. A coal boss, just a [46:11] boss. [46:12] >> A coal boss hosting, putting together a [46:14] table for thirty people. [46:16] And I just felt so pathetic. [46:18] >> Right, in such a large space, of course [46:20] it’s pathetic. It’s nothing, really. I [46:23] looked at it, I thought, why the hell am [46:25] I having a coal boss from Hebei pick up [46:27] the tab just for a meal like this? [46:29] Then, a few people went up and recited [46:31] some poorly written, nonsensical poems, [46:33] which made me feel really down. That day [46:35] I realized—and this is why I’m using [46:37] this example to support your theory— [46:39] these people all have such great [46:41] backgrounds, yet none of them amounted [46:43] to anything. [46:44] >> Uh-huh. [46:45] >> If they had amounted to anything, I [46:47] wouldn't have eaten that meal. [46:49] I wandered into the tiger's den by [46:51] mistake that day. If I had known who was [46:53] who, I never would have gone. [46:55] Think about their advantages. [46:57] To be honest, my father—my father wasn't [47:00] an official; he was just a soldier. [47:03] These people were "officials," all [47:04] founding fathers, the children of the [47:06] top elite, yet they still didn't achieve [47:08] anything. [47:09] Family upbringing is only one part. It [47:12] only limits your manners at a [47:13] superficial level. [47:15] Social education is much more important [47:17] , plus an individual’s self-restraint. I [47:19] think self-restraint is crucial. You [47:22] must have a lot of it. [47:23] >> My self-restraint is huge. You know, the [47:25] reason I didn't... [47:26] >> You know what you can't do. [47:29] The reason I didn't end up in that [47:30] pathetic state is—well, I’m just a [47:32] small-time farmer at heart, so that’s [47:34] that. [47:36] Just tending my own small plot. [47:38] People used to talk about us Hebei [47:40] people—some moved beyond it, but some [47:42] didn’t, and I didn't move beyond it. [47:44] It's said "a small plot of land is [47:46] enough to be content." People like that [47:49] are easily satisfied, and once they are [47:51] , they stop moving forward. [47:53] But someone like Qi Tongwei, coming from [47:55] a rural background—I feel like I've met [47:57] his type. [47:58] That's why he succeeded; let me tell you [48:00] , bad people are the most diligent. I’ve [48:02] noticed that good people, at times, tend [48:04] to work in a divided way. [48:07] >> It’s not just about being diligent, I’m [48:09] just... [48:10] >> Whether it's good or bad, that remains [48:12] to be seen. [48:13] >> It's just that this "diligence" must be [48:15] understood as an obsession; bad people [48:16] are especially crafty and willing to put [48:19] in the effort. In this society in China [48:21] , you really, you... [48:22] >> Actually, I don't think it's about being [48:24] "bad." Lu Xun once wrote an article [48:26] about "fierce people," and I think that [48:28] He Mei from that show, she's exactly [48:30] that kind of fierce person. These fierce [48:32] people need a group of supporters, and [48:34] the ones they pull in might be those [48:35] from privileged backgrounds; it’s [48:37] actually a mutually beneficial [48:39] relationship. So, Fang Zhou, let me ask [48:41] you, do you feel like you ever [48:43] experienced that? [48:45] For instance, when we were in college, [48:47] those who came from small towns [48:48] elsewhere would chat with Beijing [48:50] classmates, and even just hearing a [48:52] Beijing accent would make them feel a [48:54] bit inferior. [48:57] >> Hmm, since we were at Tsinghua, there [48:59] were already very few kids from Beijing [49:01] , so it didn't really matter, and [49:03] besides, I was a celebrity. [49:06] >> It’s different for him; I’m just a bit [49:08] better off in terms of status. [49:09] >> You two, stop putting on an act here. [49:11] This is seriously just—oh, it’s [49:13] unbelievable. [49:14] >> But I did have that feeling when I was [49:16] little. The second essay I ever wrote [49:17] was "I Want to Be Born in Beijing"—I was [49:19] about six and a half, and that was the [49:21] topic. [49:21] >> But if you think about it, if you had [49:23] been born in Beijing and had such an [49:25] amazing mother, you wouldn’t be like you [49:27] are now, surely. [49:27] >> Let’s not dwell on that; let’s move on, [49:29] just keep moving on. Besides, Beijing [49:31] itself isn't a city of "pure" Beijingers [49:33] . Since it was made the capital after [49:34] the founding of the country, everyone [49:36] who came here was from outside. [49:37] >> Right, I’m an outsider. [49:38] >> I remember hearing my uncle say when I [49:40] was a kid that there’s no one here who’s [49:41] a "real" Beijinger. [49:42] >> Exactly. But I’ve always felt that if [49:44] you didn't have elders like that, you [49:46] wouldn't have the personality you have [49:47] today. [49:48] >> But are you saying it's because of his [49:50] grandmother and his mother? [49:51] >> It’s family upbringing. [49:52] >> Look, your expression is clearly off, [49:54] right? Yes, family upbringing is [49:56] certainly very important, but I believe [49:58] in living simply. [50:00] Knowing the background I come from, I’ve [50:02] chosen to live a very simple life. [50:05] When have you ever seen a middle-aged [50:07] woman live so willfully and so simply? [50:09] That would be me! I don’t want it. [50:10] >> It’s fine if I don’t want anything at [50:12] all, right? True, you can manage without [50:14] wanting anything, but for those of us [50:15] with a small business owner background, [50:17] we feel we need a bit of everything— [50:19] it's a bit like being a hoodlum, you [50:21] know? [50:21] >> Right, I’m actually a true "small-time [50:23] comfort seeker"; I’m satisfied as long [50:25] as I have a little bit. [50:27] And I feel that having my pride is more [50:29] important than having that money. [50:31] Between pride and money, I would [50:32] definitely choose pride, but you pretend [50:34] to be a nobody, acting so weary, saying [50:36] "I’ve only got my tiny plot of land," [50:38] when you’ve clearly gone from being a [50:41] nobody to an original brand. [50:42] >> Yes, that’s the rhythm of going from a [50:44] rich peasant to a landlord. [50:45] >> Exactly, and you see, even now, I’m [50:48] still just a rich peasant. No, I don't [50:50] think we should judge based on [50:51] background, right? He’s thinking...look [50:54] , you’re back on the revolutionary path [50:56] again. The right path in the world is [50:58] rugged; I can’t do it. [51:00] >> Why call it revolution? [51:01] Why not call it being an idealist? [51:05] I think early idealists were simple and [51:07] direct—there were early Chinese [51:09] Communists, and the Decembrists; aren’t [51:11] they all idealists? [51:14] >> Is this in your DNA? [51:17] You have this in your bones. [51:19] I think everyone has ideals, but [51:21] everyone's ideals are different. Some [51:23] people's ideal is buying a house or a [51:25] car; perhaps I don't even know what my [51:27] own ideal is. [51:28] >> What is your ideal? [51:29] >> Huh? [51:30] >> This shows your perspective. [51:31] >> I need to think carefully about this. No [51:33] , it’s still about writing something I’m [51:35] satisfied with, so this... [51:36] >> This...this upbringing, this is [51:38] different from background. [51:39] >> Regarding upbringing, his mother was a [51:41] writer, so you see his focus. [51:42] >> His mother was a truly wonderful woman. [51:44] Right, so what is Ma’s ideal? [51:47] >> To be honest, I’m thinking about it [51:49] right now, my brain is spinning rapidly [51:50] , but I just can't come up with my ideal [51:52] . I believe that an ideal is something [51:54] unattainable by nature. Anything that [51:56] can be achieved shouldn't be called an [51:58] ideal; that's called a goal. An ideal is [52:00] something that cannot be realized. It is [52:02] beautiful to have an ideal in life. [52:05] Because there is always something you [52:06] cannot achieve leading or guiding you [52:08] forward. [52:09] Teacher, let me ask you, when do you [52:11] feel a sense of compassion now? [52:13] Especially now that you are over fifty. [52:15] >> He feels a sense of inferiority when he [52:17] looks at you now. [52:18] >> He feels inferior whenever he sees a [52:19] young beauty. [52:20] >> No, not me. I’ve fundamentally turned [52:22] that sense of inferiority into a sense [52:24] of pride. [52:27] I—I even think that, like you said, for [52:29] me, honestly, whenever I have to come [52:31] out and talk about something, I feel [52:33] quite "exposed." [52:36] Actually, for me, it’s about overcoming [52:38] an internal obstacle, because when we [52:40] were young, what was it? [52:43] If you tried to attract attention, I [52:44] would feel it was tacky. [52:46] But look, life is full of contradictions [52:48] . [52:50] You’re in this shameless profession, but [52:52] you have no idea how conflicted I am [52:54] inside—my goal is actually to retire. [52:56] But what is the prerequisite for [52:58] retiring? Making a bit more money, [52:59] having no worries about food and [53:01] clothing. [53:01] >> Right, how much money is enough to be [53:03] worry-free? [53:03] >> It means earning money that you can [53:05] never spend all of. [53:05] >> Money that you will always be spending. [53:07] >> And then you worry about how to spend it [53:09] all. [53:09] >> Right, then find a woman like what Clan [53:11] said, someone who doesn't have much [53:13] material desire, and then we're set. [53:15] You might have to find a young beauty to [53:17] chat with, from every angle. [53:20] If you find a young beauty and she has [53:22] no material needs, your life will be [53:24] incredibly boring, really. [53:26] >> Feeling like the money earned in a [53:28] lifetime can never be spent. [53:29] >> Alright, I wish us all success in [53:31] achieving our goals. Good. [53:34] >> Ideals, when it comes to ideals, I think [53:36] sincerity and integrity are quite [53:38] important.