## Detailed walkthrough
### [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=0s) Flattery as Inner Cultivation and Shifting Perspectives
Dou Wentao reflects candidly on how his attitude toward flattery and interpersonal warmth evolved over his career. Admitting that he used to carry himself with an unyielding, stony expression, Dou explains that in his earlier years he rarely smiled when meeting people, which often led others to assume he was cold, aloof, or judging them by appearances. Even when he genuinely needed a favor, his pride and social awkwardness prevented him from buttering people up; the words simply caught in his throat. However, as his circle shifted to include older, more seasoned figures like Ma Weidu, he began noticing a distinct dining culture among veterans: gatherings were characterized by relentless mutual praise rather than sharp critique. When Dou asked why their group spent so much time showering one another with compliments, Ma Weidu gave an answer that stuck with him: “Because we're older and more mature, so we only say nice things to one another.”
While this non-stop exchange of pleasantries initially felt sickening or insincere to Dou, he gradually discovered that regular outward praise subtly reshaped his internal mindset. Practicing habitual appreciation acted as a cognitive filter, training his eyes to become acutely sensitive to people's strengths rather than their shortcomings. Pointing to Xiao Qing across the table, Dou notes that he has reached a stage where he instinctively perceives her grace and can barely register any flaws. To Dou, reaching a place where looking for faults requires deliberate mental effort while seeing virtue happens automatically represents an elevated personal state: “My first instinct is to see their good side—only their good side—which is a form of inner evolution.”
[01:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=103s) Generational Banter vs. the Literary Circle's Flattery Trap
A younger guest pushes back against this elder gentility, noting that younger social circles bond through playful teasing, biting banter, and collective roasting rather than polite affirmation. Dinners among their peers frequently devolve into comedic character assassinations framed around astrology: Taureans are praised, Scorpios are labeled shameless and lecherous, and Pisces are crowned the elite masters of moral bankruptcy who win people over by an utter absence of virtue. The guest jokes that Aries only grow heads to look taller, suggesting an Aries and a Scorpio might combine to produce a truly terrifying child, highlighting why younger crowds rarely enjoy stiff, formal gatherings. Ma Weidu agrees that this dynamic is entirely different, noting that mature adults, unlike twenty-somethings, have fragile professional egos: “No matter how you say it, middle-aged folks aren’t comfortable being lectured, unless they’re very close to you.”
Ma Weidu illustrates the delicate art of middle-aged flattery by looking back at his days as an editor dealing with notoriously arrogant writers, who naturally believed their work was superior to everyone else's. When an entire room was filled with aloof literary figures, mutual complimenting was the only viable social lubricant. To show how praise can disarm even the fiercest cynic, Ma recounts how the novelist Liu Zhenyun systematically laid a trap for Wang Shuo in the cafeteria back when everyone stood in line carrying aluminum food trays. On day one, Liu praised Wang's novels, and Wang brushed it off with modest self-deprecation. On day two, Liu repeated the compliment and invoked other people's admiration, while Wang continued to deflect. By the third day of relentless flattery, Wang finally let his guard down and conceded that his novels were indeed quite good. Sitting at the very same table, Ma watched as Liu Zhenyun turned around and wryly exposed human vanity: “Most people can only hold out for three days before they fall for the flattery, right?”
[04:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=265s) The Dilution of Titles and the Yuan Dynasty Etymology of "Paimapi"
The discussion broadens to the debasement of everyday language, specifically how casual flattery morphed into the ubiquitous habit of addressing virtually everyone as "Teacher" (老师). Ma Weidu voices his irritation with this trend, remarking that young people now indiscriminately toss the title around until all traditional honorifics lose their weight and meaning. While terms like "Mr. Zhang" or "Mr. Li" once conveyed genuine, dignified respect, the title of teacher has been flattened into a vulgar social tick: “A teacher must have something to teach you, and some people simply have nothing to offer.”
Dou Wentao and Ma Weidu then explore the historical origins of the Chinese idiom for sucking up, *paimapi* (literally "patting a horse's rump"). The phrase traces back to the Yuan Dynasty, following the Mongol conquest of China. The Mongol rulers established a four-tiered ethnic hierarchy that placed Mongols at the top, Northern Han in the third tier, and Southern Han at the very bottom. Among nomadic Mongols, patting a fellow rider’s horse on the rump and praising the animal was a customary gesture of respect toward the rider. Subjugated Han subjects, desperate to curry favor with the ruling class, adopted the habit indiscriminately, aggressively patting the rump of any passing mount whether it was a prized steed, a wretched nag, or even a donkey. Dou points out that unlike Western praise, which is delivered with heads held high and a dignified posture, Chinese flattery historically carries a distinct posture of deference:
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: Origin and Evolution of Paimapi
accDescr: Diagram tracing the historical roots of the flattery idiom from Mongol equestrian customs under the Yuan Dynasty hierarchy to modern behavioral habits.
subgraph YuanDynasty["Yuan Dynasty Origins"]
A["Mongol Equestrian Custom:<br/>Patting horse rump to respect rider"] --> B["Four-Tier Ethnic Caste:<br/>Han subjects relegated to lower tiers"]
B --> C["Indiscriminate Flattery:<br/>Patting any horse or donkey to curry favor"]
end
subgraph CulturalTrait["Psychological & Physical Legacy"]
C --> D["Deep-seated Servility & Deference"]
D --> E["Physical Embodiment:<br/>Forward-leaning neck and curved spine"]
end
```
Dou reflects on his own physical posture, wondering if his chronic forward head posture and bent spine are the lingering physical manifestations of an ingrained submissive urge.
[06:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=408s) Servanthood, Evolutionary Conformity, and the Flattening of Social Hierarchy
Expanding on the instinctive drive to appease authority, the table examines the evolutionary and psychological roots of conformity. In anthropology and the animal kingdom, survival often hinges on blending in with the dominant power structure. Anthropological observations show that children, whether biological or adopted, gradually develop facial expressions and mannerisms that mirror the male head of the household to avoid rejection, since standing out within a group invites hostility. Dou notes that flattery operates on the same subconscious wavelength: it is not merely superficial hypocrisy, but an internal mechanism that reshapes perception. To illustrate this, Ma Weidu recalls watching a powerful leader produce an atrocious piece of calligraphy that ripped clean through the paper; without missing a beat or calculating his words, the secretary gasped in sheer, reflexive awe: “Wow, excellent, the ink truly penetrates the paper!”
Ma Weidu contrasts this deep-rooted servitude with modern workplace dynamics. Historically, society possessed a sophisticated "servant culture" with clear reciprocal duties and recognized stations. Unlike India's entrenched four-caste system, which made social management comparatively structured, modern China rejected formal caste divisions, creating what Ma describes as a concentric "pancake" society—mirrored by Beijing's nested ring roads—where everyone considers themselves entitled to supreme status. Since the founding narrative taught every citizen from birth to be the "master of the house," people never developed the traditional craftsmanship, grace, or etiquette of dedicated service. The old, highly refined social codes that governed stable relations between servers and guests in traditional teahouses and restaurants were dismantled, leaving people ill-equipped to serve others gracefully: “Chinese people don't think anyone is lower in the social hierarchy.”
- **Historical caste comparison**: India's governance relies on four clearly defined social tiers, whereas China functions like a flat, multi-layered pancake where nobody accepts being lower than anyone else.
- **Urban metaphor**: Beijing's traffic and nested ring roads (Second, Third, and Fourth Rings) mirror this layered pancake structure, creating heavy systemic friction.
- **Calligraphy anecdote**: An official ripped his parchment while writing, prompting an immediate subconscious compliment from his assistant claiming the ink had "penetrated the paper" (*li tou zhi bei*).
[46:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=2797s) Family Background, Self-Restraint, and the Diligence of the Ruthless
The conversation continues with a critique of the assumption that elite family origins guarantee personal success. One of the speakers points out a dinner gathering filled with offspring of founding fathers and top officials who ultimately accomplished very little, remarking that family background only polishes superficial etiquette, whereas social education and individual restraint govern true achievement. When addressing personal trajectory, Dou Wentao reflects on his own background, noting that his father was merely a soldier rather than a high-ranking official. He attributes his survival and modest comfort to a deeply ingrained peasant mentality common to Hebei locals, where cultivating a small personal plot and being easily satisfied prevents reckless ambition.
In sharp contrast to this contented passivity stands the ruthless drive of characters like Qi Tongwei from *In the Name of the People*, who rise from impoverished rural roots through sheer, obsessive effort. The table debates whether this trait should be labeled malice or single-minded focus, noting that bad people often outwork others because good people tend to divide their energy. As Dou Wentao puts it when dissecting this relentless drive, “That's why he succeeded; let me tell you, bad people are the most diligent.”
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: Paths of Personal Trajectory
accDescr: Flowchart contrasting elite stagnation, smallholder contentment, and obsessive ambition.
subgraph Stagnation["Elite Background"]
A["High Social Origin"] --> B["Superficial Manners"]
B --> C["Lack of Self-Restraint / Stagnation"]
end
subgraph Contentment["Smallholder Mentality"]
D["Modest Peasant Roots"] --> E["Self-Restraint & Contentment"]
E --> F["Quiet Stability on 'Small Plot'"]
end
subgraph Ambition["The 'Fierce' Climber"]
G["Impoverished Background"] --> H["Single-Minded Obsession"]
H --> I["Relentless Diligence / High-Stakes Ascent"]
end
```
[48:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=2902s) Fierce People, Regional Insecurities, and Upbringing
The dialogue pivots to Lu Xun’s concept of "fierce people" who claw their way to the top by leveraging alliances with well-connected elites in mutually transactional relationships. Dou Wentao asks Jiang Fangzhou whether she ever experienced the common small-town student's feeling of inferiority when encountering classmates with polished Beijing accents at university. Jiang Fangzhou playfully brushes this aside, explaining that at Tsinghua University there were few native Beijing students to begin with, and she had already established her own reputation as a published young prodigy.
She recalls that her longing for Beijing existed much earlier: at six and a half years old, her second elementary school essay was titled "I Want to Be Born in Beijing." The guests note that Beijing has historically been populated by migrants from across China rather than an insular native elite, meaning regional background is secondary to maternal and familial influence. Reflecting on her choices, Jiang Fangzhou emphasizes that an upbringing rooted in intellectual autonomy allowed her to cast aside status anxieties. When describing her refusal to conform to conventional material expectations, she asserts, “Knowing the background I come from, I’ve chosen to live a very simple life.”
[50:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=3011s) From Rich Peasant to Landlord: The True Nature of Ideals
The discussion turns to financial security versus personal pride, with Jiang Fangzhou declaring that she would invariably prioritize dignity over wealth. The panel playfully teases Dou Wentao for his recurring self-deprecation as a humble, weary peasant clinging to a modest plot, observing that he has systematically elevated himself into a recognized cultural brand—transforming from a struggling newcomer into an established landlord figure. Dou Wentao deflects the praise, claiming that true revolutionary paths are too rugged for him, which prompts a philosophical debate about whether such convictions are simply early forms of idealism, comparable to the Decembrists or the earliest revolutionaries.
Asked about her own ideal, Jiang Fangzhou defines it simply as the ability to write a literary work with which she is genuinely satisfied. Ma Weidu then steps in to delineate the fundamental conceptual boundary separating achievable targets from lifelong aspirations. When asked to formulate his own ideal under pressure, Ma Weidu clarifies, “I believe that an ideal is something unattainable by nature. Anything that can be achieved shouldn't be called an ideal; that's called a goal.” He argues that the true beauty of an ideal lies in having an unreachable standard that perpetually guides a person forward.
- **Jiang Fangzhou's definition of fulfillment:** Pursuing literary integrity over status by writing work she genuinely respects.
- **Ma Weidu's philosophical distinction:**
- *Goal:* An objective that can be practically executed and completed.
- *Ideal:* An inherently unattainable guiding light that perpetually pulls an individual forward.
[52:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=3129s) The Host's Internal Conflict, Wealth, and the Path to Retirement
As the conversation draws toward its conclusion, the panelists examine their current emotional states, aging past fifty, and feelings of vulnerability. Dou Wentao admits that appearing on camera and broadcasting his opinions has always felt like an uncomfortable act of exposure that requires overcoming a deep internal aversion to ostentatious self-promotion. He remarks on the central contradiction of his career: working inside what he self-deprecatingly calls a shameless industry while harboring a profound desire to step away entirely. Clarifying his ultimate professional objective, Dou Wentao admits, “You’re in this shameless profession, but you have no idea how conflicted I am inside—my goal is actually to retire.”
The group discusses the practical barrier to that exit: accumulating sufficient wealth so that one never worries about material survival, to the point where one struggles only with how to spend it. Bantering about finding romantic partners without excessive consumerist desires versus the boredom of living without material pursuits, the table closes the exchange with warm toasts, wishing each other success in reaching their practical goals while preserving sincerity, integrity, and impossible ideals.
## Notable quotes
> [50:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=3011s) I believe that an ideal is something unattainable by nature. Anything that can be achieved shouldn't be called an ideal; that's called a goal. — Ma Weidu
> [01:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=103s) No matter how you say it, middle-aged folks aren’t comfortable being lectured, unless they’re very close to you. — Ma Weidu
> [06:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1r-yqlveZY&t=408s) Chinese people don't think anyone is lower in the social hierarchy. — Ma Weidu
[50:11] Ma Weidu: I believe that an ideal is something unattainable by nature. Anything that can be achieved shouldn't be called an ideal; that's called a goal.
[1:43] Ma Weidu: No matter how you say it, middle-aged folks aren’t comfortable being lectured, unless they’re very close to you.
[6:48] Ma Weidu: Chinese people don't think anyone is lower in the social hierarchy.
[21:55] 周轶君: 我肯定是凤凰女的自卑,促成了我的成长,绝对是的。
Original transcript
[0:00] I started out as a sycophant, you see. I
[0:02] feel that sucking up to people is
[0:04] actually a form of self-cultivation.
[0:06] >> It's not that, I didn't mean my
[0:08] background was actually sycophancy, I
[0:10] don't...
[0:10] >> You, listen to me, I was speaking a bit
[0:12] too fast. What I mean is, years ago, I
[0:15] had a very cold face, like a stone mask
[0:17] .
[0:18] I wouldn't smile when meeting people, so
[0:20] many thought I was just judging by
[0:22] appearances.
[0:24] I didn't think that was good, you know?
[0:26] Of course, sometimes when I needed a
[0:28] favor, I couldn't bring myself to suck
[0:30] up to people; I just couldn't say it.
[0:33] >> But later, I noticed that the friends I
[0:35] associated with were mostly older people
[0:37] , like Brother Ma here.
[0:40] Later, I realized that when we ate
[0:42] together, I would sometimes ask him, "
[0:44] Why does our group always spend time
[0:46] praising each other?"
[0:48] He gave a very interesting answer.
[0:51] He said, "Because we're older and more
[0:53] mature, so we only say nice things to
[0:55] one another."
[0:59] At first, I found it a bit sickening to
[1:01] always have to say good things when
[1:02] meeting people, but you know, when you
[1:04] praise others, this external behavior
[1:06] gradually changes your habits.
[1:11] It’s human nature.
[1:14] >> Once you get used to it, what kind of
[1:16] person do you really become?
[1:18] Your eyes become very sensitive; you see
[1:20] the good in people the moment you meet
[1:22] them.
[1:23] Xiao Qing has been looking good lately;
[1:25] I can’t even see her flaws anymore.
[1:28] To me, this is the level of a
[1:29] Bodhisattva. It's like a reflex. When I
[1:32] see someone, if you ask me to find their
[1:34] faults, I have to actually think about
[1:36] it.
[1:37] My first instinct is to see their good
[1:39] side—only their good side—which is a
[1:41] form of inner evolution.
[1:43] >> I think your mindset is perhaps a bit
[1:45] old; I’m still too young.
[1:48] I...
[1:51] >> I know our social circle is all about
[1:52] teasing and poking fun at each other,
[1:54] including the friends we meet regularly
[1:56] .
[2:00] >> Sometimes you come to a meal wondering
[2:02] what you did wrong and why you're even
[2:04] eating with these people.
[2:06] For example, the most common topic at
[2:08] our dinners is astrology, like "Taurus
[2:10] is great," or "Scorpio is lecherous and
[2:13] shameless." Oh, you're a Pisces? Oh,
[2:16] Pisces are great, Pisces! The ultimate "
[2:19] scum" sign, the elite of the scumbags.
[2:23] While other signs win people over with
[2:25] virtue, you guys win by lacking it.
[2:28] >> An Aries grows a head just to look
[2:30] taller. Right, oh my, if you’re an Aries
[2:32] , you should find a Scorpio, maybe have
[2:35] a "Scaries" child.
[2:37] That’s why I finally understand why we
[2:38] don't have any young people here.
[2:41] >> Is this, is this another approach? It’s
[2:43] another approach. Master Ma and his
[2:45] group back in the day, they were the
[2:46] type who could really heap on the praise
[2:48] .
[2:48] >> Right, exactly. Deep down, people like
[2:50] hearing nice things.
[2:52] No matter how you say it, middle-aged
[2:54] folks aren’t comfortable being lectured
[2:56] , unless they’re very close to you.
[2:58] Back then, because we were all writers—
[3:00] I have to say, when I was an editor, I
[3:02] dealt with writers—writers are generally
[3:05] quite proud and aloof. Most writers
[3:07] think they’re better than everyone else
[3:08] .
[3:09] >> Right?
[3:10] >> That’s normal.
[3:12] >> It’s normal, but it’s actually quite
[3:14] abnormal when a bunch of writers are all
[3:15] together.
[3:17] So what can you do? Just shower each
[3:19] other with compliments.
[3:20] >> Hmm.
[3:21] >> I’ve mentioned this before. Liu Zhenyun
[3:22] loved to set traps, specifically for
[3:25] Wang Shuo. "Wang, your novels are really
[3:27] excellent." Wang would reply, "No, I
[3:29] can't write, it’s not good, really not
[3:31] good," and move on.
[3:33] Every day at lunch—back then we had
[3:35] meetings, so we’d eat in the cafeteria—
[3:37] and the cafeteria wasn't like today, it
[3:39] was just everyone carrying their own
[3:41] individual tray.
[3:42] The next day, he’d say the same thing. "
[3:44] Wang, I truly think your novels are
[3:46] great." Wang: "Really, they’re not good
[3:48] ." The third day, same thing: "Wang, I
[3:51] really mean it, your novels are truly
[3:53] well-written." Teacher Liu had another
[3:55] secret move.
[3:56] >> Hmm.
[3:57] >> He’d start by saying, "Little Liu thinks
[3:59] you write really well."
[4:01] >> That’s so hypocritical. He started using
[4:03] other people's names later on.
[4:06] >> Then, by the third day, Wang Shuo would
[4:08] finally say, "I do think my novels are
[4:11] pretty good."
[4:13] And I was sitting right there at the
[4:14] table.
[4:17] Liu Zhenyun would immediately change his
[4:19] tune and say to me, "Most people can
[4:20] only hold out for three days before they
[4:22] fall for the flattery, right?"
[4:25] >> Friends were just joking around, but
[4:27] that kind of flattery became quite
[4:29] vulgar for a while, and eventually, this
[4:30] vulgarity turned into a social trend
[4:32] where everyone started calling each
[4:34] other "Teacher."
[4:35] >> Hmm.
[4:35] >> Right, isn't that how it is now?
[4:37] >> Nowadays everyone calls everyone "
[4:38] Teacher." I’m still not used to some
[4:40] young girl coming up to me and calling
[4:42] me "Teacher" this or that. In terms of
[4:44] this social trend, all titles in China
[4:46] are becoming mundane and increasingly
[4:48] vulgar. I’m really not used to it,
[4:50] though I don’t care what people call me
[4:51] . Call me teacher if you like, but in
[4:53] the past, titles like Mr. Zhang or Mr.
[4:55] Li were already honorifics. Why call
[4:57] someone teacher? A teacher must have
[4:59] something to teach you, and some people
[5:01] simply have nothing to offer.
[5:04] >> You're talking about...well, "sucking up
[5:06] " or "flattering."
[5:09] I actually looked into where that term
[5:10] came from the other day.
[5:13] >> From the Yuan Dynasty.
[5:15] >> The Mongols conquered this land and
[5:17] established a hierarchy.
[5:19] Mongols were first-class citizens,
[5:21] Northern Han Chinese were third-class,
[5:23] and Southern Han were relegated to the
[5:25] fourth class.
[5:26] So, they had to curry favor with the
[5:28] Mongols. As for the Mongols, they were a
[5:31] nomadic people, and a way they expressed
[5:33] mutual respect was by patting each
[5:34] other’s horses on the rump.
[5:37] It was a sign of respect, or rather, it
[5:39] was their custom: when you saw someone
[5:41] riding a horse, you’d pat the horse’s
[5:43] rump and praise it, which was a way of
[5:45] praising the rider.
[5:46] >> And so, the Han people, who were then
[5:49] subjects, wanted to please the Mongols.
[5:51] They would just go around, regardless of
[5:53] whether you were riding a good horse or
[5:55] a bad one, or even a donkey, just pat,
[5:56] pat, pat, patting away. So it is said
[5:58] that the term "pattng a horse's rump"(
[6:00] flattery) originated this way.
[6:03] Talking about the etymology, it actually
[6:05] has something to do with a certain
[6:06] personality of self-abasement and a
[6:08] slavish mindset.
[6:10] Why is that? Foreigners also value
[6:12] praise in their social interactions, but
[6:14] I always have the impression that when
[6:16] they praise each other, they do so with
[6:18] their heads held high.
[6:19] >> Hmm.
[6:20] >> It feels dignified and confident.
[6:23] >> Polite.
[6:23] >> Right, very graceful. Why do I always
[6:26] feel—look at my spine—I feel my head is
[6:28] always leaning forward.
[6:31] If you look at me from the side, I’ve
[6:33] noticed my spine has been bent for years
[6:35] .
[6:36] I wonder if it’s related to this?
[6:39] That’s how I interpret it.
[6:41] >> This is truly an animal instinct, a
[6:43] primal nature.
[6:44] >> Whoever is authoritative, whoever holds
[6:47] the power.
[6:48] That’s just an instinct.
[6:53] There’s a phenomenon discovered by
[6:55] anthropologists: whether a child is
[6:57] biological or not—including adopted
[6:59] children—they will gradually start to
[7:01] look like the male head of the household
[7:03] .
[7:07] >> Hmm.
[7:09] >> This is an evolutionary trait; they
[7:11] strive to adapt.
[7:14] In the animal kingdom, if you are a
[7:16] spotted...
[7:19] >> If you are suddenly in our family, for
[7:21] instance, if you are different, you will
[7:24] be ostracized.
[7:27] You will try hard to grow in that
[7:28] direction so you won't be killed.
[7:31] This is long-term human evolution. Yes,
[7:34] and regarding what you said, you have to
[7:36] notice people's internal changes. Just
[7:38] like I said before, don't think flattery
[7:40] is just hypocritical; flattery also
[7:42] changes your inner self.
[7:43] >> I've seen it too. A leader was
[7:45] practicing calligraphy, and it was
[7:47] terrible; the brush even tore through
[7:48] the paper. Then the secretary said, "
[7:50] Wow, excellent, the ink truly penetrates
[7:53] the paper!" It’s completely subconscious
[7:55] ; they didn't even think about it. It
[7:56] was truly subconscious, and they really
[7:58] felt it was good. Yeah, they really did
[8:01] . Do you think you would, Li Ying? I
[8:03] believe they only have feelings for
[8:04] themselves.
[8:06] That meticulous way of serving is
[8:08] different from the relationship between
[8:09] leaders and employees we have today.
[8:12] That was a servant relationship; this is
[8:14] a work relationship.
[8:17] And in the old culture, there was a
[8:18] complete set of servant culture, which
[8:20] we have lost now; it's gone.
[8:23] China, first of all, has no caste system
[8:25] , unlike India. India's social
[8:27] governance is much easier than ours
[8:29] because they are divided into four tiers
[8:31] . Right, we are like a pancake, always
[8:33] one layer. Cities are the same.
[8:35] Beijing's traffic is like a pancake, the
[8:37] first, second, third, and fourth ring
[8:39] roads all nested, so it's very heavy.
[8:41] Chinese people don't think anyone is
[8:43] lower in the social hierarchy.
[8:45] Everyone has this attitude; others
[8:47] basically don't have it, but we all do,
[8:49] it's called being the masters of the
[8:51] house. I was told since I was born to be
[8:53] the master of the house, but suddenly
[8:55] there were no skills, none at all, so I
[8:57] didn't learn. I really don't know how to
[8:59] flatter; I've never done it. At first, I
[9:02] especially hated cringey words. I felt
[9:04] they weren't things humans would say.
[9:06] How could they say them? But they could
[9:08] say them, and those officials would
[9:10] actually accept them.
[9:11] >> Mm.
[9:12] >> I'm talking about some big officials,
[9:14] but they have all been dealt with now,
[9:16] so we won't name them.
[9:18] Others spoke that way, and I felt it was
[9:20] so hypocritical. I thought such flattery
[9:22] was very hypocritical, but they didn't
[9:24] feel it was.
[9:25] >> Right.
[9:25] >> They are very used to it, yes.
[9:28] >> Mr. Ma just mentioned that this
[9:30] hierarchical system was actually
[9:31] reasonable for a long time in the past.
[9:34] It also led to the past, for example,
[9:37] restaurants. The simplest example is
[9:39] restaurants. Mm.
[9:41] >> Back in the day, the restaurant servers
[9:43] .
[9:45] >> Right.
[9:46] >> The relationship between server and
[9:48] guest was a very stable one.
[9:51] "
[9:51] >> You are here to bring me money."
[9:53] >> So, they would serve you from the bottom
[9:55] of their hearts.
[9:58] >> But after the liberation, that
[10:00] relationship changed because they became
[10:02] "the masters," which is why in Beijing
[10:04] in the 80s, some restaurants even had
[10:06] signs saying "No beating customers
[10:08] without reason."
[10:10] Yes, that actually happened.
[10:13] >> And that made it very difficult for the
[10:15] industry to survive.
[10:20] But now, there's this rural-urban divide
[10:22] ; we recruit servers from the
[10:24] countryside, they get a salary, they
[10:26] know what to do here, they undergo all
[10:27] kinds of training—etiquette training and
[10:30] more.
[10:34] >> And training on local specialties.
[10:37] For example, I went to a Shandong
[10:39] restaurant.
[10:41] Inside, they actually...I only ate there
[10:43] once, and they sent me a text: "I'm your
[10:45] dedicated server; just look for me next
[10:47] time you come or want to book a table."
[10:49] Oh, and I later found that this girl was
[10:51] just incredibly enthusiastic. Is she
[10:53] pretty?
[10:54] >> She’s quite pretty.
[10:55] >> Is she the type who calls you "big
[10:56] brother" to be intimate?
[10:58] >> Yes, "Big brother, have you seen this
[11:00] today, what's new today..."
[11:02] "
[11:02] >> What we bought today..." Right.
[11:03] >> Yes, people in the north are quite
[11:05] outgoing. Hmm.
[11:08] >> But, later on, I couldn't go to that
[11:10] place anymore, because whether I brought
[11:12] a female colleague, a girlfriend, or my
[11:14] niece, whenever I went...
[11:17] >> Did she call them all "sister-in-law"?
[11:19] >> Yes, "sister-in-law."
[11:22] >> She would always—it’s not sister-in-law
[11:24] , she didn't remember, there was only
[11:26] one server.
[11:29] >> Which sister-in-law is it today?
[11:32] >> In the past, before the liberation...
[11:34] >> The restaurant industry really only
[11:36] started to flourish after the late Qing
[11:38] Dynasty. In a metropolis like Beijing,
[11:40] there was a very important role at the
[11:41] entrance called the "Liaogao."
[11:43] >> It’s actually called "Liaogao," meaning
[11:45] to gaze into the distance.
[11:48] >> Just one look. "
[11:49] >> Boss is here!" They would spot you from
[11:51] far away.
[11:52] >> The thing is, this "Liaogao" isn't just
[11:54] a silver-tongued talker, and it’s not
[11:56] just about having high emotional
[11:58] intelligence—though that’s surely
[12:00] required.
[12:02] His most important skill is memory; as
[12:04] long as you've been there once, he
[12:05] remembers when you came last, and why
[12:07] you came.
[12:09] He remembers everything. "Boss, your
[12:10] grandson's one-month birthday is coming
[12:13] up, right? Last time you were here for
[12:14] ..."
[12:15] "
[12:15] >> I’ll help you arrange the full-month
[12:17] feast." He’d have it all covered. He
[12:19] wouldn't say, if you brought a new
[12:21] girlfriend, "Oh, this isn't the same
[12:23] person as last time."
[12:24] He definitely wouldn't say that. He is
[12:26] exceptionally good at speaking, always
[12:28] hitting the mark perfectly—positioning
[12:30] himself just half a step below you. He
[12:32] doesn't lower himself too far, which
[12:33] would make you uncomfortable; he stays
[12:35] just half a step below. You are the
[12:37] master, and he is the servant. These
[12:39] high-level people used to earn a lot of
[12:41] money because they had a good memory;
[12:42] memory can be profitable.
[12:44] >> Because he remembers things well, many
[12:45] people say. Actually, he might have only
[12:47] gone there three times, but he'd say, "
[12:49] I own that restaurant, I go there to eat
[12:50] all the time." In the past, dining at
[12:52] such a restaurant was a big deal,
[12:53] especially if you brought guests along.
[12:54] See? "Boss Dou is here again!" Hearing
[12:56] that makes you happy, doesn't it? Others
[12:58] would say, "Where do you always go to
[12:59] eat? You must be rich."
[13:01] >> Yeah.
[13:02] >> He positions all his words perfectly;
[13:04] this must be a talent of theirs.
[13:06] >> This is high-level flattery.
[13:08] >> High-level flattery is undetectable.
[13:09] >> It's invisible. Once you can spot it,
[13:11] it's no longer effective flattery.
[13:12] >> I think it has to do with age. I feel
[13:14] like young people today really don't
[13:16] seem to know how to do it.
[13:20] So I think this high-level flattery is
[13:22] still very applicable in today's society
[13:24] .
[13:25] Sometimes they say it’s a form of
[13:27] positive energy, showing that you have
[13:29] others in your heart. And honestly, they
[13:31] say this isn't stupid at all; it’s
[13:33] actually very smart. I once saw one of
[13:36] our managers do it.
[13:37] We were having dinner with the city
[13:39] government.
[13:40] I was deeply impressed; I thought it was
[13:42] truly a special gift.
[13:44] People like that have no reason not to
[13:46] be popular.
[13:48] We were at a long table for the meeting
[13:49] .
[13:50] Then came the card exchange—swapping
[13:53] cards left and right.
[13:55] After the city leaders spoke, it was our
[13:57] side's turn.
[13:59] He stood up and said, "Respected Mayor
[14:01] so-and-so..."
[14:03] "...
[14:03] >> Secretary so-and-so, Director so-and-so
[14:05] ," listing dozens of names.
[14:07] >> I've seen this type of person too.
[14:09] >> The room just exploded with warm
[14:10] applause. It was as if he’d just looked
[14:12] at those business cards.
[14:13] >> This...
[14:14] >> So this really depends on IQ. If you
[14:16] have a poor memory, you can't do it.
[14:18] >> You know, flattery is like this—it's
[14:20] actually a mutually reinforcing culture
[14:21] . For example, I don't like to flatter
[14:23] others, and I don't like it when others
[14:25] flatter me. The moment someone tries, I
[14:27] know it immediately.
[14:28] >> But there are some who aren't like that
[14:29] . I've seen extreme flattery—this boss,
[14:32] a big boss, famous on the lists and
[14:34] everything. Yeah.
[14:35] >> Then he asked to meet me. When he
[14:36] invited me over, I went to his hotel
[14:38] lobby to wait for him. It was his hotel
[14:40] lobby, mind you. It turned out he went
[14:42] to the gym. He immediately messaged me,
[14:44] "Sorry, I'm working out, I'll be right
[14:46] back, just wait in the lobby." I waited
[14:48] in the lobby for five minutes, and then
[14:49] he walked in. After he came in, he was
[14:52] wearing a stylish tracksuit.
[14:54] He had an overcoat on.
[14:56] As soon as he walked in and saw me, he
[14:58] gave his shoulders a shake, and someone
[15:00] behind him caught the coat.
[15:02] It reminded me of a Stephen Chow movie.
[15:04] It was definitely more spectacular than
[15:06] a movie.
[15:07] >> A shake of the shoulders, and someone
[15:08] caught it. If I didn't look behind me,
[15:10] if I tried to shake it off without
[15:12] looking, it would fall to the ground,
[15:13] wouldn't that be embarrassing?
[15:16] >> Then, he started talking to me and gave
[15:18] a little wave with his hand.
[15:22] That guy immediately shoved a lit
[15:23] cigarette into his hand.
[15:26] >> He took a puff and talked to me, but
[15:28] what was he saying? It was like a scene
[15:30] straight out of a TV show.
[15:32] >> It must have been rehearsed.
[15:34] He said, "Chinese people just exercise
[15:36] blindly; I hire American trainers."
[15:40] He took a puff, and the person behind
[15:42] him snatched the cigarette away.
[15:45] Just as his hand hung there, another
[15:47] person tapped it, and a fresh one was
[15:49] stuck back in.
[15:51] I was so amused that day.
[15:53] I was about to burst out laughing.
[15:55] He didn't know what I was laughing at.
[15:58] All their movements were perfectly
[16:00] rehearsed; that person was completely
[16:02] focused on sucking up to him.
[16:04] Otherwise, if he gestured like that, you
[16:06] have to know if he wants another puff.
[16:08] If you took it away prematurely, he'd
[16:10] know; they knew everything.
[16:11] >> Yeah.
[16:13] Then there was a dedicated elevator.
[16:15] The elevator in the lobby was kept empty
[16:17] , with someone standing there waiting.
[16:20] Once he went up, there was tea and
[16:22] everything else.
[16:24] Every single movement was perfectly
[16:25] timed and rhythmic in its sycophancy.
[16:27] The whole process—I was genuinely
[16:29] impressed. I went back and tried it with
[16:32] my own coat, but it's not that easy. You
[16:34] see, you have to use your shoulders to
[16:35] shake it off. If you don't do it right,
[16:38] it won't come off. You can flail around
[16:40] for ages and the coat is still on you,
[16:41] you know? He just enjoys this; he enjoys
[16:44] it. Do you think he even cares if it's
[16:46] real or fake?
[16:47] He probably just likes the style.
[16:49] >> Right.
[16:50] >> But even if you wanted to defend against
[16:52] it, you might not be able to.
[16:54] The story Teacher Ma just told, actually
[16:56] , the biggest figure in the foodie world
[16:58] like that was Yuan Mei.
[17:00] >> In*Yanshi Dan*, he was going to the
[17:01] south to take up an official post and
[17:03] went to bid his teacher farewell. The
[17:05] teacher asked, "What have you prepared?
[17:07] " He replied, "I've prepared 100 tall
[17:09] hats (flattery)." The teacher said, "
[17:11] That's not good, is it?" He said, "
[17:13] These days, who doesn't like wearing a
[17:15] tall hat? Everyone likes to hear a few
[17:18] nice words." Then they say, how many can
[17:20] be like you, teacher?
[17:23] Oh, haha, when I went out, I told my
[17:25] attendant, "Hm, why are there only 99
[17:27] left?"
[17:29] You see, this is why I think flattery is
[17:31] a high-IQ job.
[17:34] Because, you know, leaders aren't stupid
[17:36] ; they know you're sucking up to them,
[17:38] but actually, I think to a large extent
[17:40] .
[17:42] They are amazed by your talent. For
[17:43] example, they tell this story about Ji
[17:45] Xiaolan and Emperor Qianlong's 50th
[17:47] birthday. "I'm also 50, 50," the Emperor
[17:50] said, "Ji Lan, write a couplet." He
[17:53] blurted out, "The Imperial domain spans
[17:55] forty thousand miles."
[17:59] That is to say, the territory of the
[18:01] Qing Dynasty spans forty thousand miles
[18:03] , "Since ancient times, no dynasty has
[18:05] ever unified forty thousand miles, and
[18:08] for your 50th birthday, may you have
[18:10] another 9950."
[18:15] Years.
[18:17] >> Ten thousand years.
[18:18] >> Forty thousand miles. I mean, you know
[18:20] he's flattering. Hmm.
[18:22] >> But the level is just too high.
[18:26] >> These stories, after being embellished
[18:28] by later scholars, have multiplied.
[18:30] >> Each one is more impressive, flattery at
[18:32] its finest. Sir, what you just said is
[18:35] also a question; why do I feel like, uh
[18:37] , it's not me? I, I might be bragging,
[18:39] but I always feel that if someone
[18:41] praises me, I feel uneasy; that's not it
[18:43] . Is it because of our inherent sense of
[18:45] inferiority?
[18:47] Like, for instance, if we're eating
[18:48] together and someone says, "Hey, I watch
[18:51] your show often." I seem to
[18:52] instinctively want to change the subject
[18:54] .
[18:55] But some people really enjoy it; why do
[18:57] I feel so embarrassed?
[18:59] It feels like I can't handle it. No,
[19:00] it's the same for me. I don't really
[19:02] like talking about my own show either.
[19:05] Since we're finally together, talking
[19:06] about that—because we know the show has
[19:08] various issues, and you know clearly.
[19:10] Which conversation was good, which was
[19:13] bad.
[19:13] When people talk to you about it, it's
[19:15] actually a professional matter, not
[19:17] flattery; it's just a...Otherwise, when
[19:19] I'm sitting with someone, how should I
[19:21] respond? I usually only see them through
[19:24] a screen, like, wait for some topic or
[19:26] another, right? It's awkward. Why do you
[19:28] say it's not bad? Your show is unique,
[19:30] and you are also unique, so it's not bad
[19:32] to talk about it. Some people get it
[19:34] wrong; they talk for a long time and end
[19:36] up talking about a different actor, you
[19:38] know? That's it.
[19:40] So now, when I run into actresses,
[19:42] sometimes they say, "Master Ma, do you
[19:44] still remember me?" I said I remember,
[19:46] you really remember, but I actually
[19:48] don't remember at all, because actresses
[19:50] are especially hard to tell apart. Right
[19:51] , if you just blurt it out, you're bound
[19:53] to be wrong, and then you can't be a
[19:55] nice guy anymore.
[19:55] >> Fumbling to correct yourself is
[19:57] definitely a form of flattering the
[19:58] wrong person.
[20:00] >> One time during a livestream, I was
[20:02] presenting an award with that actor, and
[20:04] while I was on air, I said, "I really
[20:05] loved your performance as Yongzheng,"
[20:07] but he didn't play that role.
[20:10] >> What did he play?
[20:11] Was it Kangxi?
[20:12] >> Oh right, he said, "I played Kangxi." It
[20:15] was so awkward. I also often run into
[20:17] people who say, "Oh, Mr. Fang Zhou, you
[20:19] can both expose frauds and write, that's
[20:21] great." You’re both a fighter and a...
[20:22] >> Let me tell you, what you said reminds
[20:24] me of something. Did you see that Jacky
[20:26] Cheung concert clip going around on
[20:27] social media lately?
[20:28] >> Jacky Cheung was performing somewhere,
[20:30] twisting and turning, and you could hear
[20:32] the audience next to him shouting, "
[20:33] Andy Lau!" Exactly. That’s one.
[20:36] Another one I heard in Shanghai was
[20:38] about David Wu.
[20:41] He opened a bar there, and a little girl
[20:43] walked in, saw him, and went right up to
[20:45] him saying, "Ng Man-tat!"
[20:48] >> Right, right, that happens all the time
[20:50] . So for actors, when you aren't really
[20:51] close, it's best to just say, "You're
[20:53] great," and don't use their names or
[20:55] talk about their work; it's very easy to
[20:56] mess up and end up flattering the wrong
[20:58] person.
[20:58] >> Doesn't Huang Bo tell a story like that
[21:00] himself? People talk to him for a long
[21:02] time, and in the end, they ask for an
[21:04] autograph, perhaps confusing him with
[21:05] Wang Baoqiang in the middle of the
[21:07] conversation, and he’s forced to sign as
[21:09] Wang Baoqiang.
[21:10] >> That’s very common.
[21:12] >> It actually happened at the airport;
[21:14] someone stopped him and said...
[21:16] "
[21:17] >> Mr. Lu Yu, I love you so much." And so
[21:19] Mr. Chen just signed "Yu" for them.
[21:24] I once, I once happened to be sitting
[21:25] right next to Mr. Jiang Kun on a flight
[21:28] .
[21:29] We were quite fated to be together; we
[21:31] sat and chatted the whole way. In the
[21:33] end, someone came up to greet me first,
[21:35] and at least they didn't get it wrong. "
[21:38] Hey!""Teacher Dao, I watch your show.
[21:40] Teacher Ma, you're here too!" Jiang is
[21:43] very humorous, isn't he? Teacher Ma, you
[21:46] fly often.
[21:47] So, this art of flattery really is a
[21:49] necessity, isn't it?
[21:51] No, it isn't. It's about sincere
[21:54] flattery.
[21:54] >> Hmm.
[21:55] >> Hey, Ma Ye, let me ask you a question.
[21:58] >> I think all four of us should answer
[22:00] this.
[22:01] >> At your current age—40, 60, or 80—
[22:07] Hey, at your age, have you ever
[22:09] reflected on whether many of your
[22:10] strengths and perceived shortcomings
[22:12] today are related to your family
[22:14] background?
[22:17] Have you pondered that?
[22:19] >> I'm certain the sense of inferiority
[22:21] from being a "phoenix girl" drove my
[22:23] growth. Yes, definitely.
[22:25] >> The flower of Hubei.
[22:27] It’s this constant atmosphere of wanting
[22:29] to break free from one's current
[22:31] environment. I’m actually from a railway
[22:33] family. My dad was an engineer and my
[22:35] mom was a teacher at a railway school,
[22:37] so effectively, I’m a railway kid too.
[22:39] Yes, basically, definitely so. But there
[22:42] was this atmosphere of "losers" in the
[22:44] railway community—I don't mean that in a
[22:46] derogatory way, just that everyone felt
[22:48] their destiny was already fixed.
[22:51] So, I was someone who wanted to escape
[22:52] that environment.
[22:54] So you often say you have a
[22:56] people-pleasing personality, where you
[22:57] involuntarily want to make others happy
[22:59] when you meet them.
[23:00] >> Right, that includes when you were young
[23:02] —
[23:02] >> You feel it’s related to that sense of
[23:04] inferiority from a small town. Actually
[23:06] , when you just mentioned seeing those
[23:07] fancy clothes, it reminded me of when I
[23:09] was about 11 or 12, going to a wealthy
[23:11] relative's home in Guangzhou to pick
[23:13] through the clothes the older sister
[23:15] didn't want. And my great-aunt was the
[23:16] one who arranged for me to pick the
[23:18] clothes. Because she was hard of hearing
[23:19] , her voice was very loud, saying, "Go
[23:21] ahead! Dig through them! Dig through
[23:23] them to your heart's content!" At that
[23:25] moment, I felt so miserable.
[23:27] That was probably the moment I clearly
[23:29] realized I was from a small city, and
[23:31] seeing those fancy clothes—That sense of
[23:33] inferiority, I think that was perhaps
[23:35] one of the most profound memories.
[23:37] >> Look, Ma Ye, if you look at the four of
[23:40] us, I always feel we two belong to the
[23:42] commoner class, while you two come from
[23:44] the new China nobility. No, I don't, I’m
[23:47] not.
[23:48] >> How are you not? You’re from an Air
[23:49] Force compound. The compound was an Air
[23:51] Force compound.
[23:52] Yes, back then, the atmosphere of his
[23:54] upbringing was unique to that place
[23:56] because the nation had just been founded
[23:58] . In our childhood, every dynasty—...is
[24:01] the same. It's the same in any country,
[24:02] because political power is seized
[24:04] through battle. Power cannot be
[24:05] negotiated or bought; it is fought for.
[24:07] The power that is seized is held by the
[24:09] first generation: the military. Every
[24:11] dynasty is the same; they always hold a
[24:13] ......higher status. Take Zhao Kuangyin
[24:15] for example. After Zhao Kuangyin
[24:16] conquered the world, he used the "cup of
[24:18] wine to release military power" strategy
[24:20] , and everyone lived well, as long as
[24:22] that power of mine disappeared. So, in
[24:24] the 50s and 60s of the last century,
[24:26] when we were growing up, the military
[24:28] received much better treatment than the
[24:30] local areas; at the very least, we never
[24:32] went hungry and there was always enough
[24:34] to eat.
[24:36] That's why I get the feeling that you
[24:38] all grew up in Beijing. Take me, for
[24:40] instance; I’m from Shijiazhuang, what
[24:42] they call the "Number One Zhuang under
[24:44] Heaven."
[24:45] I sometimes feel that, of course, using
[24:47] any region to define a person is
[24:48] something you could refute, and it’s not
[24:50] exactly scientific.
[24:52] But why do people love to chat so much
[24:54] about "Where are you from?""Where are
[24:56] you from, and where am I from?"
[24:59] For example, when I chat with them, I
[25:01] feel that people from Hebei, or us folks
[25:03] from Shijiazhuang, have a certain humble
[25:05] outlook on life deep down in our bones.
[25:09] >> Yeah.
[25:10] >> Humility, really.
[25:14] Why is it that, when you see a group of
[25:15] people, I feel like us Hebei people
[25:17] don't really like to show off our
[25:19] personalities; we prefer to keep a check
[25:21] on ourselves.
[25:25] On the contrary, take that recent
[25:27] incident with Aunt Qiong Yang; because
[25:28] of that business with her husband, she
[25:30] made sure the whole society knew about
[25:32] it.
[25:35] I realized back then that there’s a
[25:36] certain type of person who, if you ask
[25:38] me, has this sense of being a "
[25:40] character," or a sense of being the
[25:41] center of attention.
[25:45] People like me, with my background, if I
[25:47] ever lose my temper, I think, "Oh,
[25:49] goodness," because everyone in society
[25:51] has their ups and downs, so what right
[25:53] do I have to take up others 'time or
[25:55] force my personal affairs onto the whole
[25:58] of society?
[26:02] I sometimes notice that some celebrities
[26:04] have this tendency to act like they’re
[26:06] throwing a tantrum in front of the
[26:08] public—for instance, if they’re unhappy
[26:10] , they’ll just start cursing everyone
[26:12] out, acting as if...
[26:14] >> They need people to coddle them. So, you
[26:16] mean to say you can’t name names of
[26:18] these celebrities?
[26:19] >> No, I can't name names, but I can...
[26:21] >> I still can't quite figure out what kind
[26:22] of situation that is. I can't name names
[26:24] , but I can point to their backgrounds.
[26:26] I later discovered, based on incomplete
[26:28] statistics, that those who have this "
[26:30] character" or "center of attention"
[26:31] complex, or who aren't refined or
[26:33] disciplined at all, will just go out and
[26:35] shout and scream, right? They’ll go
[26:37] around cursing everyone out, and think
[26:39] the whole of society has to cater to
[26:40] them, right?
[26:41] Hey, I’ve noticed that people like this
[26:44] usually grew up in Beijing, maybe even
[26:45] having a family background like Kelan's
[26:47] .
[26:49] Really?
[26:50] >> Don't say you have it too.
[26:51] >> When did I ever have it?
[26:53] >> Let’s not beat around the bush, let’s
[26:55] speak directly.
[26:56] >> Good question, well asked. No, you’re
[26:59] actually more open-minded.
[27:00] >> What I want to say is, people keep
[27:02] bringing up background; background
[27:04] shouldn't be an excuse for a person, an
[27:06] excuse on the path of growth. If you
[27:08] want to talk about backgrounds from that
[27:10] era, it was all collective ownership,
[27:11] and Ma should be very clear about this.
[27:13] >> No, I've never claimed that.
[27:15] Back in those days, what was considered
[27:17] corruption or bribery? Every tea table,
[27:20] stool, and bed in the house,
[27:22] >> was all public property; you had no
[27:24] private assets. At the same time, your
[27:26] salary was indeed high, grandparents had
[27:29] high salaries, but they had many people
[27:31] to support.
[27:31] >> So, do you...
[27:33] >> Supporting several big families?
[27:34] >> It was all public, so do you think this
[27:36] society now also belongs to your family
[27:38] ?
[27:38] >> It's also public.
[27:41] Uh, I’d love that, but the Chinese
[27:43] feudal system has ended, so this is
[27:45] simply impossible.
[27:48] Let me analyze you; you’re not the type
[27:50] who wants to let the whole world know
[27:52] about your business, but I can still see
[27:54] some personality traits from your family
[27:55] background.
[27:58] Kelan, this personality can sometimes
[28:00] easily offend people, you know?
[28:02] Especially Chinese people, who might
[28:04] wonder why this woman acts like a hero,
[28:06] or is so well-liked,
[28:08] >> it’s just very rigid, like that.
[28:11] >> I think people just feel that this
[28:13] background becomes an excuse during the
[28:15] growth process.
[28:17] But in reality, background only reflects
[28:19] a family's upbringing.
[28:21] Not everyone's background dictates the
[28:23] shape of their personality; it’s not
[28:25] like that, everyone’s personality is
[28:27] different.
[28:29] For example, looking at my grandfather
[28:31] enduring so many blows, it taught me
[28:33] that nothing really counts.
[28:37] Regardless of what you did before, if
[28:38] they say you’re good today, you’re good
[28:40] ; if they say you’re bad tomorrow,
[28:42] you’re bad.
[28:45] If the sky falls, you have to rely on
[28:46] your own backbone to hold it up; that’s
[28:48] what it means to be an upright person.
[28:52] This has nothing to do with whether your
[28:53] background was impoverished or not.
[28:56] Instead, you keep your desires low.
[28:59] >> Right, those are two separate issues.
[29:02] The first issue is the influence of
[29:04] environment; your background, good or
[29:06] bad, plays a role.
[29:09] Another issue we are particularly
[29:11] cautious about is innate factors—what we
[29:13] call personality.
[29:15] Personality is innate and hereditary.
[29:17] Many people don't believe it when we say
[29:19] personality is hereditary. I’ll give you
[29:22] a benchmark, and you'll believe it. It’s
[29:23] hard to discuss when it comes to humans
[29:25] , because people think human factors are
[29:27] mostly acquired, but that’s not
[29:29] necessarily the case.
[29:30] International kennel clubs have a
[29:32] definition for purebred dogs.
[29:36] Aside from physical height and weight
[29:38] for males and females, the most
[29:40] important indicator is temperament.
[29:44] A dog cannot mutate for three
[29:45] generations. For instance, take a
[29:48] bulldog; the more you provoke it, the
[29:50] more aggressive it becomes. That’s its
[29:52] personality; you can't change it. A good
[29:54] environment won't make it any less
[29:55] aggressive.
[29:57] >> Then there are dogs that bark, but if
[29:59] you poke them, they retreat.
[30:01] That’s also their personality, and it
[30:03] determines if they can be listed by the
[30:05] World Kennel Club.
[30:06] And both dogs and humans are living
[30:08] beings.
[30:09] >> You’re looking at humans through the
[30:11] lens of a dog.
[30:12] When we talk about this personality,
[30:14] people often say someone is very similar
[30:16] to their grandmother.
[30:17] This is personality; there must be
[30:19] something internal being passed down.
[30:21] >> However, this transmission is modified
[30:23] because humans can change a lot
[30:24] throughout their lives and are
[30:25] restrained by culture. For example, if
[30:27] you keep hitting walls, your personality
[30:29] will become more reserved, right? If you
[30:30] never have the opportunity to hit a wall
[30:32] in your environment, your personality
[30:34] remains your own. Our personalities have
[30:35] all been modified. Does the "Lao Pao"
[30:37] archetype belong to that mindset? "
[30:39] >> Lao Pao" is "Lao Pao"; that movie really
[30:41] took things in a different direction. Is
[30:43] that right?
[30:45] "Lao Pao" is like this: historically,
[30:47] the term didn't just refer to people
[30:49] born and raised in Beijing.
[30:52] It often referred to those with a
[30:54] military compound background or those
[30:56] with a very strong sense of cultural
[30:57] self.
[30:58] The strongest concept behind these "Lao
[31:00] Pao" types is doing things without
[31:02] calculating the cost; that is the
[31:04] essence of a "Lao Pao." Hmm.
[31:06] >> The reason the "Lao Pao" spirit and the
[31:08] film became so popular later is that it
[31:10] highlighted this essence of doing things
[31:12] without counting the cost. Today, the
[31:14] first thing we do is calculate costs: "
[31:16] Is this worth my time?""
[31:17] >> Is it worth risking everything for my
[31:19] brother?"
[31:19] >> Hmm.
[31:20] >> Whenever we do something, they have to
[31:21] calculate the cost. If it takes me half
[31:23] a day to do some crappy task, I just
[31:24] won't do it.
[31:25] >> After all the calculating, it still ends
[31:27] up betraying one's brothers.
[31:28] >> So if we really must talk about one's
[31:30] background today, let's think about "
[31:31] old-timers"—it actually has nothing to
[31:32] do with birth, but rather your
[31:34] perspective. It has to do with your life
[31:35] experiences.
[31:36] >> So, does one's background influence
[31:38] perspective and experience? I think
[31:39] family upbringing has a huge impact.
[31:42] For example, my grandmother told me from
[31:44] a young age that this is a
[31:45] male-dominated society.
[31:48] As a woman, as a girl, I was the first
[31:50] child in our extended family, but I was
[31:52] unlucky enough to be a girl.
[31:54] My grandma said I had to study.
[31:57] Since I wasn't pretty, studying was the
[31:59] only way—I worked very hard later on,
[32:01] extremely hard.
[32:03] >> Compared to my beautiful mother, I was
[32:05] under a lot of pressure, and my grandma
[32:06] would say that only reading could keep
[32:08] me from being lonely. You realize that
[32:10] what happens when you’re little—think
[32:12] about it, the first time I ever wanted
[32:13] to die was when I couldn't finish my
[32:15] winter or summer homework in elementary
[32:17] school, maybe first grade; I just wanted
[32:18] to die then.
[32:19] >> Oh, that was really my grandma's wisdom
[32:21] . Looking back now, how ridiculous it
[32:23] all was! But every time I felt like
[32:25] dying, moved to tears by my own drama,
[32:27] someone would throw a book at me.
[32:29] You’d read it and realize that all those
[32:31] historical figures didn't die, so why
[32:33] should I? I’m still young and beautiful
[32:35] !
[32:35] >> Mm.
[32:36] >> I think this is very important—family
[32:38] upbringing.
[32:40] You’ll come to realize that, in fact,
[32:42] every Chinese family is essentially a
[32:44] history of blood and tears.
[32:47] If you really understand what your
[32:49] family has gone through during its
[32:51] development, when you look back and
[32:52] constantly verify your life experiences
[32:54] , you realize none of this is a big deal
[32:56] ; no matter how many hardships come,
[32:58] they’re just nothing.
[33:02] You know, there was a while where a
[33:04] popular article written by someone
[33:05] working in human resources at a company
[33:07] went viral online. Was it "Is it hard
[33:09] for kids from poor families to succeed?
[33:11] " They said a group of interns came to
[33:13] their bank, but in the end, only two
[33:15] could be kept.
[33:16] Then their colleague said, "Watch this,
[33:18] I'll tell you who's from a rural
[33:19] background, who's from a cadre family,
[33:21] and who's from an intellectual family."
[33:23] They said they were almost always right
[33:25] .
[33:26] Take a simple example: the second day of
[33:28] work, the kid from the countryside
[33:30] arrived the earliest.
[33:31] Even though he was the first to arrive,
[33:33] he didn't know how to socialize and
[33:35] wouldn't even greet people.
[33:36] >> But children from official families
[33:38] often arrive and say, "Oh, you must be
[33:40] tired, let me pour you some water."
[33:43] They know how to handle things, whereas
[33:44] the ones who are a bit annoying are
[33:46] actually children from intellectual
[33:48] families, who seem a bit haughty and
[33:49] don't really cooperate with others.
[33:52] You see, doesn't this show that these
[33:54] things are related to them and their
[33:55] upbringing?
[33:57] >> So why isn't the focus on the family
[33:59] background instead of social origin?
[34:01] I feel that the reason someone like Qi
[34:03] Tongwei can get so much sympathy is
[34:04] because of their family upbringing. He
[34:06] has absolutely no sense of awe, no sense
[34:08] of shame. Even if the background is the
[34:10] same, why would you be so hypocritical,
[34:12] pretending to be from a humble
[34:14] background? Where is there such a "
[34:16] humble" background like yours? And Fang
[34:18] Zhou...
[34:18] >> It's not about the relationship between
[34:20] Fang Zhou and his mother. I read an
[34:21] article by Fang Zhou; this is not
[34:23] ordinary. What do you call this "humble
[34:25] " background? It's intellectuals.
[34:27] Only the daughter of a woman with great
[34:29] insight and an independent personality
[34:31] could have such a personal development.
[34:33] Then that just means your father married
[34:35] above his station, and your mother
[34:37] married below hers, right? No.
[34:38] >> Yes, I really think it's a matter of
[34:40] family upbringing. It's that from a
[34:42] young age, he knew he and his mother
[34:44] were best friends; he could discuss
[34:46] anything with her, so if his mom checked
[34:48] his phone, he felt it was normal and
[34:49] fine. I should let my mother know what a
[34:51] wonderful family this is.
[34:52] >> It's that he has fewer secrets; if he
[34:54] had many secrets, he wouldn't let her
[34:55] see it either.
[34:56] >> He has secrets, he definitely has
[34:57] secrets, but the question is, what is
[34:58] this called?
[34:59] >> My father is no longer with us, but my
[35:01] mother still is. Since she's still
[35:03] around and doesn't watch the show, I can
[35:05] say whatever I want; I can say anything
[35:06] .
[35:07] >> I'll just send bags over to her.
[35:10] >> My father was the person who took care
[35:12] of me my whole life. Down to every
[35:14] single detail. Since I was little, my
[35:16] mother wouldn't wear shoes made in
[35:18] Beijing, even though she was from
[35:19] Beijing.
[35:20] She wouldn't wear them; she would only
[35:22] wear shoes from Shanghai or Guangzhou.
[35:24] That was extremely picky for that era.
[35:27] Since she was a child, she liked eating
[35:29] chocolate and things we all considered
[35:31] luxury foods, because she was a spoiled
[35:33] young lady.
[35:35] >> And then, looking into my mother's
[35:37] family history—My mother's family goes
[35:39] back five generations as major merchants
[35:41] in Lijin, Shandong.
[35:44] They were the wealthiest in the county
[35:46] for five consecutive generations
[35:48] starting from the Daoguang period, so
[35:50] later I could understand why my mother
[35:52] had so many habits...you know, where
[35:54] those quirks came from.
[35:56] They were all bourgeois habits.
[35:58] >> I, on the other hand, am not picky about
[36:00] anything. I wouldn't eat anything with a
[36:02] strong flavor. By the time I left home
[36:04] for the countryside, I had to learn to
[36:06] eat scallions, ginger, garlic, beef, and
[36:08] mutton—I had to eat everything, because
[36:09] my family had nothing. He didn't know;
[36:11] he wouldn't touch anything with any kind
[36:13] of strong flavor. Is the heat at your
[36:15] place not great? Not great, how is the
[36:17] heat?
[36:17] >> It's no good, there's no wine or
[36:19] anything prepared here.
[36:20] >> But things were different on my father's
[36:22] side.
[36:24] My great-grandfather lost both his
[36:26] parents by age six, becoming an orphan
[36:28] by twelve.
[36:30] Going to sea meant death; it was the
[36:32] most dangerous job, with a mortality
[36:34] rate for fishermen second only to miners
[36:36] .
[36:38] >> At that time, the southeast coast had
[36:40] this...one benefit, because you were
[36:42] literally betting your life. When
[36:44] everyone went out to sea, there were no
[36:46] companies, only shares; if you went, you
[36:48] had a share, because you were
[36:49] contributing your life as capital. As a
[36:51] result, they slowly started to prosper.
[36:54] After my great-grandfather made his
[36:56] fortune, he had my father educated; my
[36:58] father was his eldest grandson.
[37:00] The eldest son of the eldest son, my
[37:02] father was the first in our family to
[37:04] study. That’s how I eventually came to
[37:06] be, but what was the benefit of his
[37:08] education? Thirty-nine of them went out
[37:09] together to join the army, through the
[37:11] War of Resistance and the War of
[37:12] Liberation. He was in famous battles,
[37:14] wasn't he? Everyone knows the
[37:15] Menglianggu Campaign, then the Jinan
[37:17] Campaign, the Huai-Hai Campaign, the
[37:18] Crossing the Yangtze, and the Shanghai
[37:20] Campaign—he fought all the way through
[37:21] and survived. Why did he survive?
[37:23] Because he had an education. Educated
[37:25] people are more likely to survive until
[37:27] the end; aren't wise soldiers brave?
[37:29] Just charging blindly—your life is left
[37:31] to chance.
[37:32] >> They kept charging, they kept charging,
[37:34] there had to be a reason for that. Sorry
[37:36] , my...
[37:36] >> Getting off track, getting off track.
[37:38] >> It’s not just off track; at the very
[37:39] least, you have to look before you leap
[37:41] , right?
[37:41] >> You need time to judge the situation.
[37:43] >> Yes, exactly. We won because of the
[37:45] whole picture; without these wise
[37:46] soldiers, we couldn't have won.
[37:47] >> It all comes down to foresight.
[37:48] >> Yes, exactly. So look at these two
[37:51] families: one was an orphan. Later, I
[37:53] made a film; why was it placed at the
[37:55] end when it was broadcast?
[37:57] Because I talked about someone who was a
[37:59] third-generation pauper and eventually
[38:01] an orphan, and then this other family—
[38:03] my father's family—versus my mother's,
[38:05] which had been the wealthiest for years
[38:07] .
[38:09] How could those two ever meet? If they
[38:11] hadn't collided, I wouldn't exist, right
[38:13] ? What looks like the coincidence of a
[38:14] single family is the inevitability of a
[38:16] century of Chinese history. It’s like
[38:18] what you just said, every household goes
[38:20] through this, and
[38:21] >> Every household. And what you’re saying
[38:23] about this, this century-long
[38:25] inevitability, what is it? You really
[38:27] have seen it, speaking of the last
[38:28] hundred years in China, your parents'
[38:30] generation, your ancestors
[38:31] >> The process of reshuffling, turning
[38:33] everything upside down, look at your
[38:35] grandfather,
[38:36] >> Actually, it’s not just everyone, all of
[38:38] us, every one of us is like this.
[38:40] Your grandfather was a revolutionary,
[38:42] your grandmother was from a wealthy,
[38:44] well-to-do family.
[38:46] You see, in the old days, this would
[38:48] never have happened.
[38:49] >> You wouldn't even have met each other.
[38:51] Right, it used to be about matching
[38:52] social status, but this reshuffling—but
[38:54] let me tell you, Master Ma, even when
[38:56] you say this, I feel your background is
[38:58] better than mine, really, it isn't.
[39:00] >> I tell you, Dong, you’re sounding more
[39:03] and more reactionary.
[39:05] You keep going back to Hebei; that’s the
[39:08] problem with Hebei—it exists just to set
[39:10] off Beijing.
[39:12] That’s right, and that determines our
[39:14] sense of inferiority, you know?
[39:16] It’s always been under Beijing’s shadow
[39:18] , hasn't it?
[39:20] I think Ke is right too; it's mostly
[39:22] that, for instance, kids growing up in
[39:24] Beijing might genuinely have a broader
[39:26] perspective, right?
[39:29] And for example, with the friends I hang
[39:31] out with now, I’ve noticed they have
[39:33] this subtle, imperceptible sense of
[39:34] superiority.
[39:36] Where does this superiority show? It
[39:38] shows in their uninhibited nature. Just
[39:40] look, when we people from Hebei chat,
[39:42] including me and Fang Zhou, when we talk
[39:44] , there’s always a
[39:46] >> Why do you think I’m the host?
[39:47] >> Can you stop dragging Fang Zhou into
[39:49] this? Fang Zhou is like a little bird
[39:51] ...
[39:51] >> This is where you can tell—he needs to
[39:53] pull in an ally to have any confidence.
[39:55] That’s why, look, I’m the host, and a
[39:57] host is supposed to be accompanying
[39:59] others in conversation.
[40:00] >> I don't feel like you’re accompanying us
[40:02] ; I feel like we’re all accompanying you
[40:04] . Why, I later realized that my friends
[40:06] here in Beijing, when you really think
[40:08] about it, are like Master Ma.
[40:10] They feel that even if they were
[40:12] miserable back then—listen, this is also
[40:14] a story—
[40:15] >> Whether they were in the Propaganda
[40:17] Department, or, oh, you were in the
[40:19] Fourth Field Army, or this or that. You
[40:21] have to realize, back in our hometown, I
[40:23] think, Master Ma, you can trace back
[40:25] your ancestors and your grandfather, but
[40:27] our family’s ancestral graves are all
[40:29] gone. I asked my dad the other day, "
[40:31] It's Qingming Festival, no wonder we
[40:33] never get rich, where are our ancestral
[40:35] graves?" My dad said, "As for the land,
[40:37] who knows when the village fields might
[40:39] be leveled, and they wouldn't even tell
[40:41] us."
[40:42] It really is a silent catastrophe; we
[40:44] simply had no idea.
[40:48] And you see, my parents were both
[40:49] farmers, both from the countryside, and
[40:51] I discovered that deep down, they have
[40:53] this stoicism, or perhaps a way of
[40:55] making heavy burdens seem light.
[41:00] I even have a very interesting memory of
[41:02] this.
[41:04] Back then, I just felt that Beijing kids
[41:06] lived with such self-respect.
[41:10] When I was young, breakdancing was
[41:12] incredibly popular.
[41:14] There was a national breakdancing
[41:15] competition. I had never been to Beijing
[41:18] , and that was my first impression of
[41:20] Beijing kids.
[41:21] Do you know what that impression was? It
[41:23] was a national breakdancing competition
[41:25] , a breakdancing contest.
[41:27] The whole arena knew there was something
[41:29] crooked going on; the judges clearly had
[41:31] a dark agenda.
[41:33] Everyone could see it.
[41:37] But I noticed that our Hebei team, along
[41:39] with the others, knew it was unfair, yet
[41:40] they just took it.
[41:44] >> They swallowed their anger, finished
[41:46] performing, and left. I remember four or
[41:48] five guys from Beijing came up last;
[41:50] they had probably planned it. They
[41:52] danced incredibly well, and as the last
[41:54] one finished with a dramatic flair, one
[41:56] guy just shrugged his shoulder and said
[41:58] , "Screw this, let's go." They walked
[42:00] off right then and there.
[42:02] For a kid from Shijiazhuang, I thought,
[42:05] "Wow, Beijingers really are fearless,
[42:07] they just refuse to play along," you
[42:09] know?
[42:12] I felt like they could just live that
[42:14] way, following their impulses,
[42:15] free-spirited, while we seemed bound to
[42:17] follow all the rules.
[42:21] I think there's another reason for what
[42:22] you're describing.
[42:25] This so-called indulgence is really just
[42:27] a lack of shame in occupying public
[42:29] resources.
[42:30] They’ve been doing it since they were
[42:32] kids.
[42:33] >> No, what I mean is, actually...
[42:35] >> Let him finish. Actually, what I'm
[42:36] saying is, including the HR you
[42:38] mentioned, who serves tea and water so
[42:40] sweetly, they are also utilizing public
[42:42] resources in the same way.
[42:44] It’s because when they are serving tea
[42:46] and water, all the focus is on them.
[42:49] They have no shame in being exposed to
[42:51] everyone, making everyone revolve around
[42:53] them, including talking about their own
[42:55] affairs in public discourse, but I think
[42:57] that’s just you people from small places
[42:59] .
[43:00] >> We were also the first to sign a deal.
[43:03] Right, it's actually about feeling
[43:04] embarrassed to occupy public resources,
[43:06] so I pull back, thinking that my own
[43:08] matters and emotions shouldn't burden
[43:10] too many people.
[43:12] I don't quite understand it, but in
[43:14] today's society, everyone seems quite
[43:16] relaxed about it.
[43:18] But for example, why do I always feel
[43:20] that, say, if you want to tell the
[43:22] public about your own business, it's
[43:23] something I’ve felt since I was little—
[43:25] like, "Oh, what right do I have to make
[43:27] people listen to my business?"
[43:30] But compared to that, you see some
[43:31] people who are so expressive, and you
[43:33] actually admire them; they feel their
[43:35] personal matters are of the utmost
[43:36] importance, right?
[43:39] Hey, they complain about me, or talk
[43:41] about how their wife this or their
[43:42] husband that; why do they have this
[43:44] feeling that the whole society is...let
[43:46] me put it more practically.
[43:50] >> Among the four of us sitting here, who
[43:52] has the most assets? It must be you.
[43:54] >> My assets are you guys; I only have the
[43:56] assets of the show.
[43:59] >> I remember very clearly, when I was 20,
[44:01] I joined Channel V. My mom watched us
[44:03] kids scrambling around, and she said
[44:05] very calmly, "None of you kids will ever
[44:07] become big stars, why?"
[44:12] "Because you all just seek pleasure, and
[44:13] you have no grand ambitions because
[44:15] you're all lost souls."
[44:19] Each and every one of us grew up in our
[44:20] own families, or like us, it might sound
[44:22] like we belong to a privileged class,
[44:24] but where is that really?
[44:27] Okay, we don't have grand ambitions; why
[44:30] are we lost souls? Because I don't want
[44:32] them, I don't have the competitive
[44:34] ability, so you see the ones doing best
[44:35] now are the old-school bunch from*Qiang
[44:37] Qiang San Ren Xing*.
[44:38] >> Because what was our family background
[44:40] classified as back then?
[44:43] >> Regardless of background, you can't deny
[44:45] that you have a vanity driven by the
[44:47] need to promote economic prosperity and
[44:49] cultural progress, which pushes you step
[44:51] by step, and I'm just here scolding you
[44:53] .
[44:58] >> I'm not scolding anyone; if you insist
[45:00] on dividing it that way, that is exactly
[45:02] what I wanted to say.
[45:05] >> He's still very sensitive; actually,
[45:06] before he even said that, that was
[45:08] exactly what I wanted to talk about.
[45:10] You're only talking about phenomena;
[45:11] what about our results?
[45:12] >> Results, yes, look at the results.
[45:14] >> See, the results have emerged, you see?
[45:17] You do have competitive ability,
[45:19] competitive ability. Let me tell you, I
[45:21] participated...
[45:21] >> It's emerged, too, a famous female
[45:24] writer.
[45:24] >> Don't always dwell on that; actually,
[45:26] you two, I once participated in an event
[45:28] . That event was a huge eye-opener for
[45:31] me. People dragged me along; I didn’t
[45:33] know what for.
[45:34] Later I said I wouldn't go, but they
[45:36] said, "Come on, they’re all descendants
[45:38] of the founding fathers."
[45:40] >> Uh-huh. So, I went that day—let’s not
[45:42] name names, it’s not nice—everyone was a
[45:44] descendant of a founding father. Whose
[45:46] son, whose daughter...some really looked
[45:49] the part. They said a boss from Hebei’s
[45:51] coal mines was hosting.
[45:52] I thought it was actually the founding
[45:54] fathers or people like that.
[45:56] I got there, and this guy was just
[45:58] sitting there.
[45:59] I thought he was someone from He Long’s
[46:01] family.
[46:04] >> Turns out the host was just some coal
[46:06] mine boss from Hebei.
[46:09] Give me a break. A coal boss, just a
[46:11] boss.
[46:12] >> A coal boss hosting, putting together a
[46:14] table for thirty people.
[46:16] And I just felt so pathetic.
[46:18] >> Right, in such a large space, of course
[46:20] it’s pathetic. It’s nothing, really. I
[46:23] looked at it, I thought, why the hell am
[46:25] I having a coal boss from Hebei pick up
[46:27] the tab just for a meal like this?
[46:29] Then, a few people went up and recited
[46:31] some poorly written, nonsensical poems,
[46:33] which made me feel really down. That day
[46:35] I realized—and this is why I’m using
[46:37] this example to support your theory—
[46:39] these people all have such great
[46:41] backgrounds, yet none of them amounted
[46:43] to anything.
[46:44] >> Uh-huh.
[46:45] >> If they had amounted to anything, I
[46:47] wouldn't have eaten that meal.
[46:49] I wandered into the tiger's den by
[46:51] mistake that day. If I had known who was
[46:53] who, I never would have gone.
[46:55] Think about their advantages.
[46:57] To be honest, my father—my father wasn't
[47:00] an official; he was just a soldier.
[47:03] These people were "officials," all
[47:04] founding fathers, the children of the
[47:06] top elite, yet they still didn't achieve
[47:08] anything.
[47:09] Family upbringing is only one part. It
[47:12] only limits your manners at a
[47:13] superficial level.
[47:15] Social education is much more important
[47:17] , plus an individual’s self-restraint. I
[47:19] think self-restraint is crucial. You
[47:22] must have a lot of it.
[47:23] >> My self-restraint is huge. You know, the
[47:25] reason I didn't...
[47:26] >> You know what you can't do.
[47:29] The reason I didn't end up in that
[47:30] pathetic state is—well, I’m just a
[47:32] small-time farmer at heart, so that’s
[47:34] that.
[47:36] Just tending my own small plot.
[47:38] People used to talk about us Hebei
[47:40] people—some moved beyond it, but some
[47:42] didn’t, and I didn't move beyond it.
[47:44] It's said "a small plot of land is
[47:46] enough to be content." People like that
[47:49] are easily satisfied, and once they are
[47:51] , they stop moving forward.
[47:53] But someone like Qi Tongwei, coming from
[47:55] a rural background—I feel like I've met
[47:57] his type.
[47:58] That's why he succeeded; let me tell you
[48:00] , bad people are the most diligent. I’ve
[48:02] noticed that good people, at times, tend
[48:04] to work in a divided way.
[48:07] >> It’s not just about being diligent, I’m
[48:09] just...
[48:10] >> Whether it's good or bad, that remains
[48:12] to be seen.
[48:13] >> It's just that this "diligence" must be
[48:15] understood as an obsession; bad people
[48:16] are especially crafty and willing to put
[48:19] in the effort. In this society in China
[48:21] , you really, you...
[48:22] >> Actually, I don't think it's about being
[48:24] "bad." Lu Xun once wrote an article
[48:26] about "fierce people," and I think that
[48:28] He Mei from that show, she's exactly
[48:30] that kind of fierce person. These fierce
[48:32] people need a group of supporters, and
[48:34] the ones they pull in might be those
[48:35] from privileged backgrounds; it’s
[48:37] actually a mutually beneficial
[48:39] relationship. So, Fang Zhou, let me ask
[48:41] you, do you feel like you ever
[48:43] experienced that?
[48:45] For instance, when we were in college,
[48:47] those who came from small towns
[48:48] elsewhere would chat with Beijing
[48:50] classmates, and even just hearing a
[48:52] Beijing accent would make them feel a
[48:54] bit inferior.
[48:57] >> Hmm, since we were at Tsinghua, there
[48:59] were already very few kids from Beijing
[49:01] , so it didn't really matter, and
[49:03] besides, I was a celebrity.
[49:06] >> It’s different for him; I’m just a bit
[49:08] better off in terms of status.
[49:09] >> You two, stop putting on an act here.
[49:11] This is seriously just—oh, it’s
[49:13] unbelievable.
[49:14] >> But I did have that feeling when I was
[49:16] little. The second essay I ever wrote
[49:17] was "I Want to Be Born in Beijing"—I was
[49:19] about six and a half, and that was the
[49:21] topic.
[49:21] >> But if you think about it, if you had
[49:23] been born in Beijing and had such an
[49:25] amazing mother, you wouldn’t be like you
[49:27] are now, surely.
[49:27] >> Let’s not dwell on that; let’s move on,
[49:29] just keep moving on. Besides, Beijing
[49:31] itself isn't a city of "pure" Beijingers
[49:33] . Since it was made the capital after
[49:34] the founding of the country, everyone
[49:36] who came here was from outside.
[49:37] >> Right, I’m an outsider.
[49:38] >> I remember hearing my uncle say when I
[49:40] was a kid that there’s no one here who’s
[49:41] a "real" Beijinger.
[49:42] >> Exactly. But I’ve always felt that if
[49:44] you didn't have elders like that, you
[49:46] wouldn't have the personality you have
[49:47] today.
[49:48] >> But are you saying it's because of his
[49:50] grandmother and his mother?
[49:51] >> It’s family upbringing.
[49:52] >> Look, your expression is clearly off,
[49:54] right? Yes, family upbringing is
[49:56] certainly very important, but I believe
[49:58] in living simply.
[50:00] Knowing the background I come from, I’ve
[50:02] chosen to live a very simple life.
[50:05] When have you ever seen a middle-aged
[50:07] woman live so willfully and so simply?
[50:09] That would be me! I don’t want it.
[50:10] >> It’s fine if I don’t want anything at
[50:12] all, right? True, you can manage without
[50:14] wanting anything, but for those of us
[50:15] with a small business owner background,
[50:17] we feel we need a bit of everything—
[50:19] it's a bit like being a hoodlum, you
[50:21] know?
[50:21] >> Right, I’m actually a true "small-time
[50:23] comfort seeker"; I’m satisfied as long
[50:25] as I have a little bit.
[50:27] And I feel that having my pride is more
[50:29] important than having that money.
[50:31] Between pride and money, I would
[50:32] definitely choose pride, but you pretend
[50:34] to be a nobody, acting so weary, saying
[50:36] "I’ve only got my tiny plot of land,"
[50:38] when you’ve clearly gone from being a
[50:41] nobody to an original brand.
[50:42] >> Yes, that’s the rhythm of going from a
[50:44] rich peasant to a landlord.
[50:45] >> Exactly, and you see, even now, I’m
[50:48] still just a rich peasant. No, I don't
[50:50] think we should judge based on
[50:51] background, right? He’s thinking...look
[50:54] , you’re back on the revolutionary path
[50:56] again. The right path in the world is
[50:58] rugged; I can’t do it.
[51:00] >> Why call it revolution?
[51:01] Why not call it being an idealist?
[51:05] I think early idealists were simple and
[51:07] direct—there were early Chinese
[51:09] Communists, and the Decembrists; aren’t
[51:11] they all idealists?
[51:14] >> Is this in your DNA?
[51:17] You have this in your bones.
[51:19] I think everyone has ideals, but
[51:21] everyone's ideals are different. Some
[51:23] people's ideal is buying a house or a
[51:25] car; perhaps I don't even know what my
[51:27] own ideal is.
[51:28] >> What is your ideal?
[51:29] >> Huh?
[51:30] >> This shows your perspective.
[51:31] >> I need to think carefully about this. No
[51:33] , it’s still about writing something I’m
[51:35] satisfied with, so this...
[51:36] >> This...this upbringing, this is
[51:38] different from background.
[51:39] >> Regarding upbringing, his mother was a
[51:41] writer, so you see his focus.
[51:42] >> His mother was a truly wonderful woman.
[51:44] Right, so what is Ma’s ideal?
[51:47] >> To be honest, I’m thinking about it
[51:49] right now, my brain is spinning rapidly
[51:50] , but I just can't come up with my ideal
[51:52] . I believe that an ideal is something
[51:54] unattainable by nature. Anything that
[51:56] can be achieved shouldn't be called an
[51:58] ideal; that's called a goal. An ideal is
[52:00] something that cannot be realized. It is
[52:02] beautiful to have an ideal in life.
[52:05] Because there is always something you
[52:06] cannot achieve leading or guiding you
[52:08] forward.
[52:09] Teacher, let me ask you, when do you
[52:11] feel a sense of compassion now?
[52:13] Especially now that you are over fifty.
[52:15] >> He feels a sense of inferiority when he
[52:17] looks at you now.
[52:18] >> He feels inferior whenever he sees a
[52:19] young beauty.
[52:20] >> No, not me. I’ve fundamentally turned
[52:22] that sense of inferiority into a sense
[52:24] of pride.
[52:27] I—I even think that, like you said, for
[52:29] me, honestly, whenever I have to come
[52:31] out and talk about something, I feel
[52:33] quite "exposed."
[52:36] Actually, for me, it’s about overcoming
[52:38] an internal obstacle, because when we
[52:40] were young, what was it?
[52:43] If you tried to attract attention, I
[52:44] would feel it was tacky.
[52:46] But look, life is full of contradictions
[52:48] .
[52:50] You’re in this shameless profession, but
[52:52] you have no idea how conflicted I am
[52:54] inside—my goal is actually to retire.
[52:56] But what is the prerequisite for
[52:58] retiring? Making a bit more money,
[52:59] having no worries about food and
[53:01] clothing.
[53:01] >> Right, how much money is enough to be
[53:03] worry-free?
[53:03] >> It means earning money that you can
[53:05] never spend all of.
[53:05] >> Money that you will always be spending.
[53:07] >> And then you worry about how to spend it
[53:09] all.
[53:09] >> Right, then find a woman like what Clan
[53:11] said, someone who doesn't have much
[53:13] material desire, and then we're set.
[53:15] You might have to find a young beauty to
[53:17] chat with, from every angle.
[53:20] If you find a young beauty and she has
[53:22] no material needs, your life will be
[53:24] incredibly boring, really.
[53:26] >> Feeling like the money earned in a
[53:28] lifetime can never be spent.
[53:29] >> Alright, I wish us all success in
[53:31] achieving our goals. Good.
[53:34] >> Ideals, when it comes to ideals, I think
[53:36] sincerity and integrity are quite
[53:38] important.