Isaacson Details How Musk's Traumatic Upbringing Drives SpaceX, Tesla Success

Walter Isaacson: Elon Musk’s Father Was A Monster, He Ruined His Life — The Diary Of A CEO

The Diary Of A CEO

Elon Musk's childhood emotional trauma and severe relationship with his father created an addiction to crisis that fuels his extraordinary engineering achievements while destroying his personal stability.

AI-assisted summary of Walter Isaacson: Elon Musk’s Father Was A Monster, He Ruined His Life — original source. Check the original for full context.

Source published:

Detailed notes

## Background This episode was published by The Diary Of A CEO with Steven Bartlett on YouTube on November 30, 2023. According to the page description, it features a conversation with biographer Walter Isaacson discussing the life, childhood trauma, and psychological drivers of Elon Musk following the release of Isaacson's biography on him.

## TL;DR In this wide-ranging discussion, biographer Walter Isaacson reflects on his two years spent shadowing Elon Musk, examining how Musk's traumatic childhood and abusive relationship with his father shaped his intense, drama-addicted leadership style. The conversation explores Musk's first-principles thinking, his high-stakes management tactics during the Twitter acquisition, and his deeply personal motivations behind SpaceX and Tesla. Isaacson contrasts Musk's mercurial, risk-seeking nature with Steve Jobs, highlighting how personal pain, an obsession with detail, and an existential urgency drive Musk's mission to make humanity multi-planetary.

## Atmosphere & style The conversation carries an intimate, analytical, and deeply reflective tone, striking a balance between psychological diagnosis and corporate biography. Walter Isaacson speaks with the thoughtful, steady authority of a seasoned biographer, bringing nuance and quiet humor to stark stories of chaos, factory-floor surges, and emotional tailspins. The dynamic between Bartlett and Isaacson feels like an engrossing fireside chat that oscillates between dark, sobering revelations about trauma and fascinating breakdowns of high-stakes disruption.

## Key takeaways - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=0s) Walter Isaacson spent two years side-by-side with Elon Musk, noting that while every great disruptor is driven by personal demons, Musk's hardwiring and childhood trauma were particularly brutal. - [03:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=202s) Musk devotes about 80% of his mental energy to execution and designing the manufacturing systems ('the machines that make the machines') rather than mere high-level conceptual ideas. - [07:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=470s) Severe physical bullying at school and relentless psychological abuse from his father Errol Musk instilled in Elon a lifelong drive to seek out drama and associate pain with progress. - [25:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=1544s) Musk relies on 'first-principles thinking'—stripping problems down to fundamental physical truths and viewing all rules and regulations as mere recommendations. - [29:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=1783s) High-pressure tactics and severe deadlines, such as personally cutting server cables in Sacramento or demanding weekend launches, reflect Musk's belief that you must risk breakages to innovate. - [34:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=2086s) Musk's political shift toward fighting the 'woke mind virus' was heavily catalyzed by personal grief over his daughter's transition and complete ideological rejection of him. - [38:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=2280s) Musk bought Twitter viewing it as an engineering challenge, while explicitly rejecting the concept of 'psychological safety' in favor of urgent intensity and a smaller, hardcore team. - [55:39](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=3339s) Musk's mission to make humanity multi-planetary stems from an existential fear regarding the rarity and survival of human consciousness, driving an intense urgency due to his own mortality. - [01:00:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=3649s) Musk operates in mercurial psychological states, cycling into destructive 'demon mode' episodes where he admits to periodically self-sabotaging. - [01:03:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=3801s) When hiring, Musk prioritizes an 'all-in hardcore attitude' over experience, believing technical skills can be taught but fundamental mindset cannot. - [01:06:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=3978s) Both Steve Jobs and Elon Musk built their success on extreme iteration, obsession with hidden details, a 20% tolerance for failure, and forcing deadlines through a 'reality distortion field'. - [01:13:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=4429s) Musk actively places zero value on personal happiness or relaxation, viewing his life's work akin to a video game addict immediately moving to the next level. - [01:20:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=4810s) Musk's engineering methodology, 'The Algorithm,' requires questioning every rule, deleting unnecessary parts, accelerating cycle times, and forcing engineers onto the factory floor. - [01:23:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=5023s) Underneath Musk's relentless drive and turbulent romantic relationships lies a profound childhood fear of being alone.

## Detailed walkthrough Here is a detailed, faithful walkthrough of the provided transcript segment.

---

[00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=0s) Introduction: Unprecedented Access to Disruptive Geniuses

The episode begins with an introduction highlighting Walter Isaacson's unique position as a biographer who gained years of direct, intimate access to two of the most transformative figures of the modern era: Steve Jobs and Elon Musk. Isaacson observes that while every world-shifting disruptor he has ever chronicled is driven by deep-seated personal demons, Elon Musk’s psychological drivers were unusually brutal. Born as a scrawny kid on the autism spectrum with no friends, Musk suffered physical beatings at school and psychological torture at home from his abusive father.

Isaacson spent two years shadowing Musk "morning, noon, and night" to uncover how his psychological hardwiring and chaotic upbringing created an executive who is explicitly addicted to drama. In one illustrative anecdote from Twitter (now X) headquarters, Musk demanded the removal of a specific server farm. When engineers told him it was impossible to do quickly, he fired them, showed up at the facility on Christmas Eve with wire cutters, and cut the server cables himself. While his erratic methods drove his teams crazy, they consistently pushed people to accomplish feats they previously thought impossible.

The host, Steven Bartlett, makes a quick appeal to the audience, noting that 58% of regular listeners are not yet subscribed. He promises that subscribing will support the show's transition into a more documentary-style format featuring rich archival footage and deeper context.

* **Key Detail:** Walter Isaacson spent roughly two years following Steve Jobs and another two years side-by-side with Elon Musk. * **Key Detail:** Musk spent 80% of his "hardcore mental energy" on manufacturing and engineering systems rather than high-level conceptual ideas. * **Verbatim Quote:** "All the people I've written about who are disruptors, they tend to have had demons driving them. But for Elon Musk, it was particularly brutal."

---

[03:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=202s) Working Closely with the Greatest Minds of the 21st Century

Isaacson details the specific scope and access he had with three major subjects of his recent work: Steve Jobs, Dr. Jennifer Doudna, and Elon Musk. Jobs ushered in the digital revolution through personal computing and the iPod ("a thousand songs in our pocket"). Isaacson then shadowed Nobel laureate Jennifer Doudna in her UC Berkeley lab to understand CRISPR gene-editing technology, which launched the life sciences revolution. Musk represented the next natural frontier: space travel, electric vehicles, and artificial intelligence.

When Isaacson initially approached Musk, he set strict conditions: he would not write the book based on a few formal interviews, but rather by embedding himself alongside Musk for two years with no pre-publication review or editorial control granted to Musk. Musk immediately agreed. Isaacson notes that Musk possesses a distinct "superhero complex" and views his own trajectory alongside historical figures like Steve Jobs.

Isaacson contrasts the operational focus of Steve Jobs and Elon Musk based on his time with both: * **Steve Jobs's Focus:** Jobs was obsessed with product conceptualization and beautiful design. Isaacson frequently stayed in Jobs's guest house and spent long stretches in Jony Ive's design studio at Apple headquarters, where Jobs would spend hours obsessing over minute physical details, such as the exact curvature and design of a European power plug compared to an American one. * **Elon Musk's Focus:** Musk is focused heavily on execution, assembly lines, and factory design. Rather than product aesthetics, Musk devotes most of his mental energy to "designing the machines that make the machines"—optimizing the production pipelines for Raptor rocket engines, Tesla battery cells, and vehicle assembly lines.

* **Key Detail:** Isaacson spent about three to four weeks per month traveling with Musk, whereas his time with Jobs was structured in one-week blocks every couple of months. * **Key Detail:** NASA and Boeing lost the immediate capability to launch American astronauts into orbit independently, leaving SpaceX as the sole U.S. entity executing crewed orbital launches for a time. * **Verbatim Quote:** "Musk spends about 80% of his hardcore mental energy designing the machines that make the machines."

---

[07:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=470s) Misfits, Childhood Trauma, and the Legacy of Errol Musk

Isaacson explains that great disruptors throughout history almost universally begin as societal misfits. Leonardo da Vinci was an illegitimate, left-handed, gay, easily distracted youth in a small village who ran away to Florence; Albert Einstein was a Jewish youth in Germany; Steve Jobs was adopted and felt out of place. Musk’s childhood in South Africa, however, was exceptionally severe. As a lonely kid on the autism spectrum, he lacked social communication skills and was frequently targeted by bullies, once suffering a beating so severe it required four days in the hospital.

The psychological damage from school paled in comparison to his home life. When Musk returned from the hospital, his father, Errol Musk, made him stand in front of him for two hours, berating him as a loser and taking the side of the bully who had attacked him. Isaacson draws a parallel to classical mythology, describing Musk as an aspiring superhero fighting the dark side of the force, only to discover his father is Darth Vader.

Isaacson shares that it took a full year of continuous travel before Musk would open up about his father. The breakthrough occurred during a quiet flight on Musk's private jet from Texas to California. After Isaacson asked about his father for the twentieth time, Musk sat in absolute silence for two to three minutes before finally recounting the painful stories of his upbringing. Isaacson also interviewed Errol Musk at length and notes that Errol—a brilliant engineer himself—suffers from a severe "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde" personality, shifting unpredictably into abusive, demon-like states that he later barely remembers.

* **Key Detail:** Errol Musk caused deep psychological trauma within the family by fathering two children with a young woman he had originally raised as his stepdaughter. * **Key Detail:** Isaacson cites Barack Obama’s memoir observation that every successful man is either trying to live up to the expectations of his father or live down his father's sins; in Musk's case, it is both. * **Verbatim Quote:** "Shakespeare, as usual, said it best: 'Even the best are molded out of faults.' And indeed, that's what you're talking about, whether it's Michael Jordan or Kobe or Elon Musk."

---

[14:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=883s) Raising Resilient Children, Risk-Taking, and Pain as Love

The conversation shifts to parenting and how resilience is formed. Isaacson notes that modern parents tend to overprotect and coddle their children, whereas Musk’s upbringing in South Africa was largely "free-range" and un-hovered. Errol Musk gave Elon a motorcycle when he was around 11 or 12 years old, allowing him to roam freely and take immense risks.

Isaacson contrasts this with how Musk parented his son, X (X Æ A-12). Isaacson recalls watching 3-year-old X playing dangerously close to heavy electrical cables during a midnight solar roof installation, and later playing inside an active fire pit after the first SpaceX Starship launch test in South Texas. When Isaacson felt the impulse to pull the child to safety, Musk recounted how his own parents allowed him to play with matches behind a tree as a child, and Maye Musk remarked, "I think it's one generation of risk-takers training the next."

Following his parents' divorce, Musk's mother, Maye, worked up to three jobs to support the family, leaving young Elon largely unsupervised. Despite his father's abusive nature, a young teenage Elon made the perplexing decision to move back in with Errol. Musk's brother, Kimbal Musk, explained this choice by stating that Elon deeply "associates pain with love." Musk himself acknowledged to Isaacson that severe adversity shaped his identity, instilling in him a lifelong psychological drive to seek out drama and rush directly into metaphorical fires.

* **Key Detail:** Musk has 10 surviving children and frequently brings his young son X to high-stress work environments, including factory floors, F1 races, and rocket launch pads. * **Key Detail:** The first integrated test flight of SpaceX's Starship rocket in South Texas flew successfully for approximately three minutes before ending in an explosion. * **Verbatim Quote:** "Kimbal, his brother, says he associates pain with love. And Elon Musk says to me, 'Adversity shaped me. It made me who I am.'"

[18:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=1117s) Recreating Childhood Drama and the Driven Observer

Elon Musk constantly seeks to recreate the chaos and turmoil of his youth in apartheid-era South Africa, where he witnessed extreme violence and endured severe psychological abuse from his father. By contrast, Walter Isaacson reflects on his own upbringing in New Orleans, living near his childhood roots amidst supportive parents and lifelong friends. This comfortable background left Isaacson without the destructive inner drive of a classic disruptor. While Isaacson operates primarily as an observer—aside from intense periods like running CNN during the Gulf War—he acknowledges that figures like Steve Jobs and Musk possess a rare willingness to run straight into metaphorical fires.

* Isaacson still lives about eight blocks from where he was born in New Orleans. * Isaacson previously ran CNN during the intense period of the Gulf War.

---

[20:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=1214s) Trauma as a Catalyst for Drive

While a traumatic childhood does not guarantee success—as many individuals with difficult backgrounds become "ne'er-do-wells"—there is a distinct, non-zero correlation between early adversity and an intense drive to succeed. Possessing demons to harness and something to prove out of childhood frequently pushes disruptors beyond normal limits.

---

[21:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=1260s) Elon's Academic Focus and Early Coding

Musk was a decent student in South Africa, but he was far from a flawless academic performer. His SAT scores were fine, but he did not achieve perfect 800s across the board. Because he struggled to apply himself to subjects that did not spark his interest—even flunking Afrikaans in school—his talent only emerged when he could focus intensely on subjects he cared about, particularly materials science and engineering.

When home computers first emerged during his youth, Musk immediately threw himself into learning programming. He taught himself languages like C++, Pascal, and Python in just a few days. By age 12 or 13, he coded and published his own original video game, *Blastar*, sparking a lifelong obsession with both programming and video games.

``` "He had an intense focus. So when he focused on something... he would be awesomely smart. Problem is he doesn't like things that don't interest him." ```

* Musk's early self-taught languages included C++ and Pascal. * He created and published the video game *Blastar* around age 12 or 13.

---

[22:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=1368s) Innate Intensity and the Autism Spectrum

Musk's mother, Maye Musk, recognized his potential early on. When schools complained that a five- or six-year-old Elon was unfocused or staring blankly out the window, she defended him fiercely, telling educators that he was simply a genius who was not being sufficiently challenged.

Isaacson asserts that one cannot simply choose or force oneself to become Elon Musk. While figures like Benjamin Franklin achieved greatness through deliberate curiosity and keen observation, Musk's level of intensity cannot be replicated through willpower or stimulants. His drive stems from a combination of childhood trauma, mood swings, an addiction to turmoil, and being on the autism spectrum (Asperger's). This hardwiring leaves him with weak emotional receptors for human interaction, but grants him a "maniacal intensity of focus" on complex engineering and coding challenges.

* Maye Musk identified Elon as a genius by age five or six. * Musk's intense focus is shaped by childhood trauma and being on the autism spectrum.

---

[25:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=1544s) First-Principles Thinking and the Physics of Risk

When Musk left South Africa, he pursued dual degrees in physics and business. His motivation for studying business was pragmatic: he refused to work for business executives who did not understand the underlying science of their products. This decision was an early demonstration of his "first-principles thinking"—a core philosophy where every problem is stripped down to its fundamental physical truths, ignoring conventional rules, regulations, and industry norms as mere recommendations.

Isaacson illustrates this mindset through SpaceX's founding. After attempting to buy second-hand rockets in Russia and getting jerked around, Musk calculated the raw material costs of a rocket—including fuel, carbon fiber, and Inconel—on his flight home. Realizing the physical materials were only a fraction of a finished rocket's commercial price, he reasoned that manufacturing costs could be reduced tenfold. Musk constantly challenges his engineers to justify design choices using pure physics rather than administrative rules, driven by a belief that modern society has accumulated too many regulators and lawyers relative to true risk-takers.

``` "There are no rules, there's no regulations, there's no protocols except for the laws of physics. Everything else is just a recommendation." ```

``` "The people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world are the ones who do." ```

* Musk studied physics and business concurrently so he wouldn't have to work for non-technical managers. * Key rocket materials evaluated using first principles include Inconel, carbon fiber, and rocket fuel. * Steve Jobs popularized the "think different" ethos at Apple through a famous ad campaign featuring disruptive thinkers.

---

[29:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=1783s) Extreme Measures: The Sacramento Server Farm and Starbase Surge

Musk’s ruthless application of first principles often manifests in chaotic, high-pressure confrontations with his employees. Around Christmas, Musk reviewed Twitter's infrastructure and determined that maintaining three redundant server farms (Portland, Sacramento, and Atlanta) was unnecessary. When Twitter engineers insisted that decommissioning the Sacramento location would take six months to ensure proper backup caching, Musk grew dark, cutting the deadline from six weeks down to six days.

Unsatisfied with the delay, Musk took matters into his own hands on Christmas Eve while flying from San Francisco to Austin with two engineer cousins. He ordered the pilot to make a U-turn over Nevada and land in Sacramento. Armed with a pocket knife to pry up floor tiles and wire cutters purchased at Home Depot, Musk and his team personally severed server cables and hauled equipment out in a rented U-Haul truck. While the sudden removal temporarily degraded system stability, the facility was successfully shut down. Musk operates on the philosophy that if you aren't causing problems 20% of the time, you aren't taking enough risks.

``` "Do you have got a pocket knife?" ```

``` "I'd rather be burned out than bored." ```

A similar episode occurred late on a Friday night after 10:00 p.m. at SpaceX's Starbase facility in southern Texas. Seeing only a handful of workers on the launchpad, Musk confronted engineer Andy Crab. When Crab explained that no launch was scheduled for the weekend, Musk ordered an immediate "surge," demanding 100 workers be flown in overnight from California and Florida to stack the rocket immediately. Employees slept on the floor to meet the mandate. Although Crab eventually resigned due to burnout when he had a child, he later asked Musk to rejoin SpaceX, choosing the intensity of space exploration over a comfortable career.

* Twitter's primary server farms were located in Sacramento, Portland, and Atlanta. * Musk personally cut server wires using wire cutters bought from Home Depot. * SpaceX engineer Andy Crab was forced to organize an emergency weekend "surge" at Starbase. * Roughly 20% to 30% of Musk's employees thrive under his intense demands, while nearly 80% of Twitter's original staff departed following his takeover.

---

[34:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=2086s) Political Evolution and Family Trauma

Over three to four years, Musk shifted from a center-left political stance—having previously donated to Barack Obama and voted for Joe Biden—to a bitter crusade against what he terms the "woke mind virus." While this ideological evolution was driven by several factors, the primary personal catalyst was a deep rift with his child.

Musk's eldest surviving child, named Xavier after the X-Men character, transitioned three years prior, taking the name Jenna and asking that her father not be informed. Though Musk accepted her gender identity, Jenna adopted radical anti-capitalist, progressive views, declaring capitalism to be theft and disowning her billionaire father by changing her last name. Musk experienced deep grief over the rejection, placing much of the blame on the progressive environment of Crossroads, the high school she attended in Los Angeles.

* Musk previously supported Barack Obama and Joe Biden before shifting politically. * His child Xavier transitioned, adopted the name Jenna, and disowned Musk. * Musk attributes part of her anti-capitalist ideology to Crossroads, a progressive school in Los Angeles.

Elon Musk’s Political Shift and the Pain of Family Estrangement

Walter Isaacson notes that Elon Musk’s ideological shift during the COVID-19 pandemic—where he felt the progressive left was overdoing lockdowns and gender ideology—echoed his father Errol's somewhat conspiratorial thinking regarding vaccines and Dr. Anthony Fauci, creating a weird evolution still felt in the waters of Twitter today. When Steven Bartlett asks about how Isaacson knows that his daughter Xavier transitioning and legally changing her name to a woman caused Musk a tremendous amount of pain, Isaacson explains that Musk is surprisingly easy to read. Musk states outright that "nothing cause has caused me more pain" than his daughter totally rejecting him, second only to the death of his first child in infancy. Isaacson observes that Musk gets very dark when discussing this, and members of his inner family confirm that this is the source of his deepest personal anguish.

---

The Acquisition of Twitter at Giga Texas

Shifting to the acquisition of Twitter, Isaacson recounts being present in April 2022 on the mezzanine of the newly opened Giga Texas in Austin before the factory was even officially running. Musk had just become the world's richest person, Financial Times and Time person of the year, and successfully landed and reused 33 rockets that year, yet he announced, "Okay, I'm buying Twitter." His brother Kimbal, his son Griffin, and three or four friends tried to talk him out of it, questioning the wisdom of such a massive distraction. Isaacson, acting as the quiet observer taking notes, also thought it was a terrible idea because Musk completely lacked human emotional awareness. When Isaacson asked Musk why he was doing it, Musk replied, "Well, it's a product problem. They need better engineering. They haven't put any new features in. They don't have emotion video. So, it's an engineering challenge." Isaacson thought to himself that Twitter wasn't an engineering product at all, but rather an advertising medium meant to gather eyeballs in a friendly environment—neither of which played to Musk's strengths.

* **Key Context:** The acquisition took place while opening Giga Texas in April 2022. * **Inner Circle Reaction:** Kimbal Musk, Griffin Musk, and close friends all tried to talk him out of the deal. * **Musk's Rationale:** Framed purely as an engineering and product problem lacking new features.

---

The Fallout of the Twitter Buyout and SpaceX Resilience

Reflecting on the aftermath, Isaacson believes the Twitter acquisition heavily damaged Musk's reputation among progressive demographics, which in turn hurt Tesla sales. However, SpaceX remained largely unaffected because Musk maintained intense focus. On the very day of recording, Musk was managing the 40th Falcon 9 launch of the year to send up 20 more Starlink satellites, alongside launching Starship with all 33 Raptor engines successfully firing. While Tesla would be better off without the Twitter distraction and the tenfold increase in controversy that harmed mass-market car sales, SpaceX continued thriving through sheer operational momentum.

---

Rebuilding Twitter Culture: Urgency Over Psychological Safety

Recalling the day before Musk took over Twitter, Isaacson describes the rapid and jarring shift in corporate culture. The existing Twitter environment was nurturing and sweet, complete with yoga rooms, artisanal coffee bars, quiet mental energy spaces, and a strong emphasis on "psychological safety." When these features were proudly shown to Musk, he let out a raspy laugh and declared, "Psychological safety $\dots$ screw that. An urgent intensity is our operating principle. Psychological safety is our enemy." He transformed the company into a hardcore, all-in environment requiring 24/7 dedication, aiming for a team reduced to 20% of its original size but operating with an order of magnitude more intensity.

---

The Trade-Offs of Disruptive Leadership

Bartlett and Isaacson debate whether letting a "grenade off in the building" is a valid strategy for stagnant, bloated corporations facing fast-moving market disruptions. Isaacson acknowledges that while this aggressive approach yields amazing innovations, it also leaves a wake of rubble, damage, and heavy personal trauma. Former Tesla President John McNeill and others admitted this might simply be the unavoidable price of high disruption, though Isaacson questions whether the human toll is too high. Contrasting corporate environments, Isaacson recalls running Time magazine in the 1990s as a golden era filled with daily cocktail carts, roast beef carvery carts, and town cars for weekend houses—an idyllic culture that ultimately needed disruption when the internet arrived. Moving to CNN afterward, Isaacson found himself less suited to being a disruptive leader who could fire 80% of the workforce like Musk. He emphasizes that while AI, robotics, and broader market shifts demand corporate agility, a grueling hackathon-style culture is not the only path forward. Drawing on the Oracle of Delphi's ancient maxim, Isaacson stresses that leaders must "know thyself" and understand where their personal comfort zones lie.

---

Leadership Styles: Velvet Gloves Versus the Iron Fist

Recalling conversations with Steve Jobs, Isaacson shares that Jobs once told him his leadership style used "velvet gloves" designed to make people comfortable, whereas Jobs believed he had to make people uncomfortable and challenged because he could not afford to tolerate or coddle B players. Isaacson argues that while a leader can foster creativity through a comfortable environment, they must occasionally adopt a hardcore stance. Furthermore, a strong leadership team requires a balance of traits. Pointing to Intel's founding team, Isaacson contrasts the incredibly friendly and people-oriented CEO Bob Noyce and visionary Gordon Moore with the tough, microchip-delivering co-founder Andy Grove. Every successful leadership team needs both an inspiring figure and a hammer.

---

The Quest to Be Liked and Burnout Culture

Both Steve Jobs and Elon Musk viewed trying too hard to be liked as a major professional weakness. Musk told Isaacson that empathy and collegiality can be corporate enemies, while Jobs accused Isaacson of practicing empathy partly out of vanity—caring too much about whether subordinates loved him rather than focusing purely on building a disruptive organization. Isaacson admits that while this philosophy worked at Time, his desire to be liked by problematic anchors at CNN proved to be a leadership limitation. Conversely, Musk's employees either display fierce, walk-through-walls loyalty—such as SpaceX President Gwynne Shotwell, Drew Baglino, and Franz von Holzhausen—or burn out quickly and leave. Much like Jobs telling Pepsi executive John Sculley whether he wanted to sell sugar water or change the world, Musk motivates late-night teams at SpaceX launchpads by convincing them they hold the most exciting and important job on Earth: getting humanity to Mars.

---

Musk's Core Missions and Fear of Mortality

When Isaacson first heard Musk articulate his three ultimate missions—getting humanity to Mars, securing sustainable energy on Earth, and making robotics safe—he initially dismissed them as standard podcast pontification or pep talks. However, after hearing Musk repeat them constantly, even muttering them to himself while walking around factories and staring into the distance with genuine anxiety that humanity might fail, Isaacson became fully convinced that Musk deeply believes in his mission of spacefaring.

By the way, to unlock the full functionality of all Apps, enable [Gemini Apps Activity](https://myactivity.google.com/product/gemini).

[55:39](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=3339s) The Mission to Mars and the Obsession with Time

Walter Isaacson explains that Elon Musk's obsession with space travel is driven by two fundamental beliefs rather than a desire to make money—noting dryly that starting a rocket company is hardly step one if you just want to be the richest person on Earth. First, Musk genuinely believes human consciousness is extraordinarily rare—and perhaps unique in the universe—because if it existed elsewhere, it likely failed to become multi-planetary before its host planet was destroyed. While ordinary people do not wake up worrying about the extinction of human consciousness, Musk has carried that existential anxiety since he was 15 years old. Second, he views space exploration as the ultimate human adventure, arguing that while humanity is constantly consumed by immediate geopolitical problems, people need a grand, inspiring vision set on new frontiers to give life meaning.

Because of this grand mission, Musk lives with a constant, nervous inner calculation about his own mortality. Now in his fifties, he estimates he might have roughly 30 years left, creating immense urgency to get a mission to Mars underway within a decade. Isaacson notes that while Musk's timelines are notoriously off by a factor of two or three—whether regarding Full Self-Driving, the Cybertruck, or Mars—he believes human missions to Mars are realistic within 30 years even if a 10-year timeline is unlikely. Surprisingly, despite this race against time, Musk shows little interest in optimizing his physical health to prolong his lifespan, often mocking his fellow tech executives who obsess over longevity protocols.

Isaacson recalls being with Musk one morning when the billionaire was attempting an intermittent fasting regimen paired with weight-loss medication. They went to the Palo Alto Creamery along with Musk's young son, X Æ A-XII (Lil X). Because it was his single allowed meal of the day, Musk ordered a double bacon cheeseburger, sweet potato fries, and an Oreo chocolate chip milkshake, announcing, "Okay, it's my one meal of the day." Isaacson chuckled at the memory, reflecting that while he isn't a diet expert, it hardly seemed like an optimal longevity strategy.

* Musk believes human consciousness is rare and vulnerable to planetary extinction events. * He views space exploration as an essential source of inspiration to balance everyday human struggles. * Unlike tech figures like Sam Altman who maintain disciplined diets and workouts, Musk ignores traditional longevity practices. * Musk sold all five of his luxury homes in an attempt to live frugally and appease his transitioning daughter, residing instead in a small two-bedroom house near Starbase in South Texas. * The South Texas house contains a cross-trainer exercise machine in a small room, though Musk rarely uses it and eschews exercise, yoga, meditation, or swimming.

---

[01:00:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=3649s) Musk's Mercurial Mental Health and Dark Cycles

Describing Musk's inner psyche, Isaacson characterizes his mental health as "incredibly mercurial." Musk cycles through distinct operational modes: he can be immensely cheerful, inspiring, witty, and laser-focused on engineering, only to suddenly plummet into what his former partner Grimes dubbed "demon mode." Musk himself acknowledges that he is likely bipolar—though never formally diagnosed—and occasionally uses prescribed medications. Isaacson recounts witnessing times when Musk entered terrifying emotional tailspins, including a complete breakdown in 2018 where he was almost catatonic on the floor of the Fremont factory, sending destructive tweets like calling a British cave diver a pedophile or impulsively declaring he was taking Tesla private at $420 a share.

These dark, volatile periods recur regularly, often manifesting late at night as self-destructive or conspiratorial posts on social media. Isaacson highlights a poignant moment from Christmas—the day after Musk personally led a chaotic midnight server-hauling operation at a Twitter data center—when Musk sat with his brother Kimbal and family members. When asked what he regretted most about the year, Musk admitted that he periodically starts "shooting myself in the foot or stabbing myself in the thigh." Isaacson notes that the central paradox of Musk's life is whether this emotional turmoil and dark volatility can be separated from the intense drive that makes him so extraordinarily successful.

> "I regret the fact that every now and then I start shooting myself in the foot or stabbing myself in the thigh." — Elon Musk

---

[01:03:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=3801s) How Musk and Steve Jobs Built Teams and Managed People

When asked how extraordinary leaders build teams, Isaacson contrasts the management philosophies of Steve Jobs and Elon Musk. Musk insists on hiring for attitude over existing skills or knowledge, operating on the belief that technical skills can be taught, whereas a fundamental shift in attitude "requires a brain transplant." In the early days of Tesla and SpaceX, Musk personally interviewed virtually every applicant to ensure they possessed an "all-in hardcore attitude." While Musk's high-pressure environment leads to higher turnover, he has maintained key long-term lieutenants, such as Gwynne Shotwell running SpaceX for over 20 years alongside Mark Juncosa, and stable core teams at Tesla.

By contrast, Steve Jobs viewed building a long-term team as his single greatest achievement. Isaacson recalls walking in Jobs's backyard short before his death and asking him what his finest product was. Expecting Jobs to say the Mac or the iPhone, Jobs replied that making products is hard, but building an enduring team that keeps making great products—referencing leaders like Jony Ive, Phil Schiller, Eddy Cue, and Tim Cook—was his true masterpiece. Isaacson notes that while Musk is much more of a singular, autocratic boss who struggles to delegate authority compared to Jobs, his obsessive, maniacal focus on technical details is precisely why SpaceX succeeds where legacy aerospace companies like Boeing struggle.

* Musk prioritizes "hardcore" attitude over technical experience when hiring. * Key long-term leaders at SpaceX include President Gwynne Shotwell and VP of VP of Vehicle Engineering Mark Juncosa. * Steve Jobs considered his executive team at Apple to be his greatest product creation. * Musk rarely delegates total authority, preferring to dive maniacally into specific engineering bottlenecks himself.

---

[01:06:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=3978s) Shared Principles: Obsession with Detail, Risk, and Delusion

Steve Jobs and Elon Musk shared a maniacal passion for perfection that extended to the hidden, unseen details of their creations. Jobs often recalled a lesson from his father, who insisted that the back of a wooden fence facing scrubland had to be built as beautifully as the front; when young Steve asked why since no one would see it, his father replied, "Yes, but you will know." This ethos translated directly into Apple products, where Jobs demanded that circuit boards inside the original Macintosh look beautiful despite being sealed inside the case. Similarly, on the exact night Twitter's board accepted Musk's acquisition offer, Musk spent two hours in South Texas obsessing over a tiny leaking valve in the Raptor engines on Starship.

Both leaders relied on extreme iteration, rapid experimentation, and a high tolerance for public failure. When SpaceX's massive Starship rockets exploded during early test flights, critics declared them failures, but Musk viewed them as victories because he believes that if you aren't failing at least 20% of the time, you aren't taking enough risk. Isaacson contrasts this aggressive, experimental culture with risk-averse institutions like NASA or Boeing. Additionally, both leaders famously deployed a "reality distortion field"—willing impossible things into existence through sheer intensity. While this occasionally failed (such as Jobs trying to wile away his cancer or Musk repeatedly missing Full Self-Driving deadlines), it enabled both men to bend reality and accomplish feats others deemed impossible.

When pushed on their unrealistic deadlines, Musk openly acknowledged his habit to Isaacson, quipping: "I'm a specialist at turning the impossible into the merely very late." To enforce this, Musk frequently manufactures high-stress "surges"—such as demanding a rocket be fully stacked by Friday when engineers estimated months, or spending midnight on a roof personally demanding a Tesla solar roof installation be finished in 24 hours—using extreme pressure as an essential operating principle.

* Steve Jobs demanded hidden internal components of the Macintosh be aesthetically pleasing. * Elon Musk spent the night of his Twitter takeover fixated on a leaking Raptor engine methane valve. * Musk embraces a minimum 20% failure rate as proof of sufficient risk-taking and rapid experimentation. * Both leaders used unrealistic deadlines and forced "surges" to push teams far past their perceived physical limits.

> "I'm a specialist at turning the impossible into the merely very late." — Elon Musk

[01:13:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=4429s) Is Elon Musk Happy?

When asked whether Elon Musk is happy, Walter Isaacson gives a direct "No." Musk is not only rarely happy, but he actively places zero value on happiness, pleasure, calmness, or sweetness. If forced to list his top ten desires in life, simple contentment or relaxing at the beach wouldn't even make the list. Isaacson quotes Musk’s ex-wife, English actress Talulah Riley, who noted that Musk is simply incapable of stopping to savor or smell the flowers. When Isaacson asked Musk directly if he ever took joy in his monumental achievements, Musk compared himself to a video game addict: the moment he completes one level, his mind instantly fixates on grinding through the next level, whether playing *Elden Ring*, *Polytopia*, or building companies.

Isaacson contrasts Musk’s mindset with other prominent figures he has studied. While Steve Jobs shared that relentless obsession—immediately pivoting from the success of the iPod to worrying that cell phone makers would eat their lunch, thus forcing Apple to cannibalize its own product to build the iPhone—Jeff Bezos represents a starkly different model. Bezos embraces the fruits of his success, relaxing on massive yachts and enjoying vacation homes. Isaacson cheekily notes a potential trade-off: Bezos's space company, Blue Origin, has yet to put a payload into orbit. Musk, for his part, openly rejects the yacht lifestyle, insisting that relaxing in luxury is simply not what drives him.

- Talulah Riley observed that Musk lacks the desire to sit back, be content, or savor his successes. - Musk compares his internal drive to a video game addiction, continually seeking the next challenge after beating a level in games like *Elden Ring* or *Polytopia*. - Steve Jobs famously operated under the philosophy that "we have to be able to cannibalize ourselves or other people will eat us for lunch." - Musk and Bezos fought bitterly over NASA Launch Complex 39A at Cape Canaveral and filed lawsuits over satellite deployments. - Musk expressed respect for Bezos, stating he wished Bezos would spend less time in hot tubs or on yachts so Blue Origin could drive space exploration faster. - Musk went ballistic when Bezos attempted to patent the concept of self-landing, reusable booster rockets that SpaceX was already developing.

---

[01:17:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=4657s) How Writing Biographies Changed Walter Isaacson

Spending years studying figures like Steve Jobs and Elon Musk deeply altered Isaacson’s personal perspective on work and life. Studying Jobs taught him to care deeply about the details nobody sees—much like the aesthetic layout of the hidden circuit board inside the original Mac. Jobs and Musk were never primarily motivated by money or building the most valuable companies; their financial success was a byproduct of an unyielding passion for the product itself.

However, observing Musk’s extreme lifestyle reinforced Isaacson’s commitment to his own personal boundaries. The price Musk pays for his extraordinary output—being brutal to the people around him and destroying any semblance of work-life balance—is a price Isaacson considers far too high for himself. Having been married for nearly forty years, Isaacson recognizes that Musk's toxic traits and brilliant traits are inextricably woven into the exact same fabric, making it impossible to separate his genius from his destructive nature.

- Jobs’s obsession with invisible quality (e.g., painting the inside of the Mac chassis or circuit boards) taught Isaacson never to cut corners in his own research and writing. - Apple and Tesla became world-dominant companies because their founders pursued product excellence rather than raw profit margins. - Isaacson stresses that an individual's bad traits and visionary traits are often completely interwoven and impossible to disentangle.

---

[01:20:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=4810s) "The Algorithm": Musk’s Five-Step Engineering Method

Isaacson breaks down Musk's strict engineering methodology, known simply as "The Algorithm." Born out of first-principles thinking, the framework is designed to strip away bureaucracy, speed up manufacturing, and eliminate costly bottlenecks on factory floors.

1. **Question every rule and requirement:** Every requirement must come with the name of the actual person who made it, not a department or regulation. If there isn't a fundamental law of physics enforcing it, the requirement must be challenged and likely discarded. 2. **Simplify and delete:** Inspired by Steve Jobs’s approach to the iPod—demanding that any song be accessible within three clicks with no instruction manual needed—simplify the product down to its absolute essence. 3. **Speed up cycle time:** Accelerate processes aggressively to push teams past perceived limitations. 4. **Automate:** Only automate after steps 1 through 3 are complete. Musk learned the hard way that automating unnecessary or flawed steps leads to catastrophic delays.

To execute this algorithm, Musk places his engineers' and designers' desks directly on the assembly line. Rather than outsourcing manufacturing, engineers are forced to watch the production line every hour so they can immediately fix part failures—whether a strip of trim on a Tesla headlight or wiring on a SpaceX Raptor engine. Musk even forces employees to write their signatures directly onto the rocket parts they are responsible for; if an engineer cannot reduce a component's cost by 80%, they are replaced.

---

[01:23:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=5023s) Musk’s Relationships and Fear of Being Alone

Turning to Musk's turbulent personal life, Isaacson notes that Musk carries a deep childhood association between love, pain, and drama. Whether at Twitter, SpaceX, or Tesla, Musk actively craves chaos, and this emotional blueprint spills directly into his romantic relationships. Most of his romantic partners have possessed a fiery intensity, ranging from his first wife, Justine Musk, to Amber Heard and Grimes. The clear exception was Talulah Riley, whom Isaacson calls a loving, calming influence. Ultimately, Riley realized that Musk's chaotic environment was not for her and returned to England.

Underneath this drive for drama lies a profound, lifelong fear of isolation. Musk was so intensely lonely as a child in South Africa that being alone remains his single greatest terror. To counter this, he constantly keeps companions and his children nearby. During rocket launches, he is routinely surrounded by his kids, including his son Griffin and his young son X. Isaacson shares a sweet anecdote about one of Musk's teenage sons who is on the autism spectrum; the boy once asked his father, "Why doesn't the future look like the future, Dad?"—a simple line that directly inspired Musk to design the ultra-futuristic Cybertruck.

- Musk craves intensity and drama in romantic partners, seen in relationships with Justine Musk, Amber Heard, and Grimes. - Talulah Riley provided a peaceful retreat, but ultimately stepped away because she preferred a calm environment over Musk's non-stop intensity. - Musk’s deepest psychological fear is being alone, stemming from acute childhood isolation. - The futuristic design of the Tesla Cybertruck was directly prompted by a question from Musk’s autistic teenage son.

---

[01:26:36](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=5196s) The Secret to Happiness and the Role of the Storyteller

Answering the traditional podcast closing question left by the previous guest—asking for the single most important characteristic to live a happy and successful life—Isaacson answers: "Knowing your mission and knowing yourself." True happiness follows when an individual stops chasing personal ego and aligns their skills with something larger than themselves. When addressing college graduates, Isaacson routinely rejects the cliché advice to "follow your passion," telling students instead that their "stupid little passion" only gains value when tied to a higher purpose.

For Isaacson, his own mission is historical storytelling. While he acknowledges that writing biographies isn't as grand as building rockets to conquer Mars or manufacturing electric vehicles, storytelling remains humanity’s oldest, most sacred tool for transmitting core values—from early campfires and Homer's *Odyssey* to the book of Genesis. Host Steven Bartlett closes by thanking Isaacson for his extraordinary work, praising the *Elon Musk* biography as an unmissable masterclass in human nature, trauma, and elite performance.

- Isaacson defines a successful life as combining self-awareness ("know thyself") with a mission that serves something larger than oneself. - He advises graduates against blindly following their "stupid little passion" unless it connects to a broader, meaningful contribution. - Storytelling is highlighted as society's most enduring vehicle for passing down human values across generations. - Host Steven Bartlett praises the biography as an unmatched, deeply intimate breakdown of human trauma and exceptional drive.

Here is the walkthrough for the final section of the transcript:

[01:31:28](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=5488s) The Importance of Sleep and Eight Sleep Sponsorship

Steven Bartlett reflects on the critical role that sleep plays in maintaining overall health and fitness. He shares that out of all the factors contributing to well-being, sleep has become the one he prioritizes and reflects on most frequently throughout his day. Every morning, the very first action he takes is checking his sleep metrics. He uses this data as a guiding blueprint to structure his schedule—determining the intensity of his workouts, deciding how many meetings to take, identifying commitments that ought to be canceled, and setting an exact bedtime for the evening.

To wrap up the episode, Steven highlights Eight Sleep as a sponsor of the podcast. He expresses his desire to offer value to his audience by securing a discount for them. He directs listeners to visit their landing page to claim a $150 discount on the Eight Sleep Pod Cover—the exact temperature-regulating cover he uses on his own bed. He encourages listeners to buy the cover, reach out via direct message, and share their feedback on how it improves their sleep experience. Lastly, Steven points viewers toward another podcast episode linked in the description, noting that audiences who enjoyed this conversation with Walter Isaacson tend to love that episode as well.

- Steven considers sleep to be the single most important factor in health and daily performance management. - Daily routine adjustment depends on morning sleep data: workout intensity, meeting schedule, and bedtime are all dictated by the previous night's metrics. - Sponsorship deal: Listeners can visit `[eightsleep.com/steven](https://eightsleep.com/steven)` to save $150 on the Eight Sleep Pod Cover.

## Notable quotes > [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=0s) All the people I've written about who are disruptors, they tend to have had demons driving them. But for Elon Musk, it was particularly brutal. — Walter Isaacson

> [03:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=202s) Musk spends about 80% of his hardcore mental energy designing the machines that make the machines. — Walter Isaacson

> [07:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=470s) Even the best are molded out of faults. — Walter Isaacson

> [14:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=883s) Kimbal, his brother, says he associates pain with love. And Elon Musk says to me, 'Adversity shaped me. It made me who I am.' — Walter Isaacson

> [21:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=1260s) He had an intense focus. So when he focused on something... he would be awesomely smart. Problem is he doesn't like things that don't interest him. — Walter Isaacson

> [25:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=1544s) There are no rules, there's no regulations, there's no protocols except for the laws of physics. Everything else is just a recommendation. — Walter Isaacson

> [25:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=1544s) The people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world are the ones who do. — Walter Isaacson

> [29:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=1783s) Do you have got a pocket knife? — Elon Musk

> [29:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=1783s) I'd rather be burned out than bored. — Walter Isaacson

> [43:16](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=2596s) Psychological safety... screw that. An urgent intensity is our operating principle. Psychological safety is our enemy. — Elon Musk

> [01:00:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=3649s) I regret the fact that every now and then I start shooting myself in the foot or stabbing myself in the thigh. — Elon Musk

> [01:06:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=3978s) I'm a specialist at turning the impossible into the merely very late. — Elon Musk

## Mentioned Walter Isaacson, Elon Musk, Steven Bartlett, Steve Jobs, Jennifer Doudna, Brian Chesky, Errol Musk, Maye Musk, Kimbal Musk, X Æ A-12, Jenna Musk, Andy Crab, Gwynne Shotwell, Drew Baglino, Franz von Holzhausen, Mark Juncosa, John McNeill, Jony Ive, Phil Schiller, Eddy Cue, Tim Cook, Bob Noyce, Gordon Moore, Andy Grove, John Sculley, Jeff Bezos, Talulah Riley, Justine Musk, Amber Heard, Grimes, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Anthony Fauci, Leonardo da Vinci, Albert Einstein, Benjamin Franklin, The Diary Of A CEO, Apple, Tesla, SpaceX, Twitter, X, CNN, Time Magazine, Intel, NASA, Boeing, Blue Origin, Crossroads School, UC Berkeley, Home Depot, Eight Sleep, Uber One, Huel, CRISPR, Raptor Engine, Falcon 9, Starship, Starlink, Cybertruck, Full Self-Driving, Blastar, Elden Ring, Polytopia

[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE)

中文简报

艾萨克森详述马斯克童年创伤如何驱动SpaceX与特斯拉取得成功 埃隆·马斯克童年的情感创伤以及与父亲的严苛关系,让他对危机产生了一种成瘾心理,这在推动其取得非凡工程成就的同时,也摧毁了他个人的生活稳定。 在这场广泛深入的对话中,传记作家Walter Isaacson回顾了他贴身跟访Elon Musk两年的经历,剖析了Musk痛苦的童年以及遭受父亲虐待的关系如何塑造了他激烈且酷爱戏剧化危机的领导风格。对话探讨了Musk的第一性原理思维、他在收购Twitter期间采取的高压管理手段,以及他推动SpaceX和Tesla背后深层的个人动机。Isaacson还将Musk反复无常、热衷冒险的天性与Steve Jobs进行了对比,强调了个人的痛苦、对细节的执念以及一种生存紧迫感,是如何驱动Musk去实现让人类成为多行星物种这一使命的。 传记作家沃尔特·艾萨克森近距离跟访马斯克两年,发现他深受童年严酷创伤与霸凌驱动,并将大约80%的心智精力倾注于设计制造系统与工程流水线(“制造机器的机器”)。 (3:22) 马斯克推崇“第一性原理思维”,视物理法则为唯一底线,视常规规则与流程为建议;在推特搬迁服务器迟缓时,他甚至在圣诞夜亲自用断线钳切断电缆强制迁离。 (29:43) 马斯克近年来政治立场转向激进抨击“觉醒思维病毒”,主要催化剂来自家庭裂痕:其大女儿完成性别过渡后彻底在意识形态上否定并断绝父女关系,给他造成了难以弥合的剧痛。 (34:46) 入主推特后,马斯克公开摒弃“心理安全感”并实施硬核高压重组;与此同时,对人类意识灭绝与自身寿命极限的深层焦虑,驱使他不计健康代价急迫推进火星殖民计划。 (55:39)

Reading summary

Biographer Walter Isaacson argues that Elon Musk's world-altering drive stems from severe childhood trauma, an addiction to drama, and an uncompromising engineering ethos that deliberately discards empathy, comfort, and standard corporate guardrails to force radical innovation. Childhood Trauma and the 'Demon Mode' Engine (7:50) Musk grew up as an isolated, autistic child in South Africa who suffered violent school bullying—once requiring four days in the hospital—and severe psychological torment at home. Following that hospital stay, his father, Errol Musk, forced him to stand for two hours while berating him and defending the attacker. Errol's unpredictable, volatile behavior and deep family disruptions (including fathering two children with his former stepdaughter) left enduring scars. Musk's brother, Kimbal Musk, observed that Elon fundamentally associates pain with love, prompting him to repeatedly recreate turmoil throughout his adult life. Isaacson describes Musk's mental health as highly mercurial and marked by cyclical tailspins. Former partner Grimes termed his darkest, cold operational state 'demon mode.' Musk has acknowledged likely having undiagnosed bipolar disorder and openly admitted that he periodically self-sabotages, stating that he finds himself 'shooting myself in the foot or stabbing myself in the thigh' through destructive, late-night public posts and impulsive declarations during periods of high stress. First Principles and the Production Line 'Algorithm' (25:44) In contrast to Steve Jobs's obsession with consumer aesthetics and design studio details, Isaacson reports that Musk spends roughly 80% of his mental energy directly on manufacturing systems—'designing the machines that make the machines.' Guided by dual degrees in physics and business, Musk applies first-principles thinking, reducing every production bottleneck to the basic laws of physics while treating regulatory, institutional, and administrative rules as mere recommendations. This mindset is codified in Musk's five-step engineering method, known as 'The Algorithm': question every requirement by demanding the name of the specific individual who created it; simplify and delete parts or processes; accelerate cycle times; and automate only after previous steps are finished. To enforce accountability, Musk places engineers' desks directly on factory assembly lines, requires engineers to physically sign the rocket components they design, and replaces staff who fail to reduce part costs by substantial margins. Manufactured Surges and Discarding Psychological Safety (29:43) Musk operates on the conviction that an organization failing less than 20% of the time is insufficiently taking risks. He flatly rejects modern management concepts like psychological safety, branding them corporate enemies that induce complacency. Instead, Musk routinely manufactures high-pressure 'surges' to test human limits, such as ordering 100 engineers to fly overnight to Starbase on a Friday to stack a Starship rocket, or personally flying to Sacramento on Christmas Eve to sever server cables with wire cutters after staff warned an orderly shutdown would take months. This grueling operating environment produces acute burnout alongside rapid technical breakthroughs. When acquiring Twitter, Musk ridiculed its nurturing corporate culture, eliminated yoga spaces and wellness amenities, and cut roughly 80% of the workforce. Isaacson notes that while Musk's iron-fisted demands repel many employees and trigger high turnover, they also inspire an all-in cohort of loyal lieutenants who accomplish engineering feats previously considered impossible. Family Estrangement, Ideological Drift, and Mars Urgency (34:46) Musk's transition from a center-left donor into an aggressive combatant against what he terms the 'woke mind virus' was heavily catalyzed by family heartbreak. His eldest surviving child, Jenna, transitioned and cut all ties with him, declaring capitalism evil. Musk stated to Isaacson that this total rejection caused him more anguish than anything else in his life besides the infant death of his firstborn child, leading him to place blame on progressive education and culture. Simultaneously, Musk's lifestyle is dictated by existential anxiety regarding human consciousness, which he views as fragile and rare. Estimating that he may have 30 years of life remaining, he imposes unrealistic deadlines to make humanity multiplanetary within a decade. Musk openly dismisses personal happiness, work-life balance, and luxury longevity routines, comparing his psyche to that of a video game addict who feels no contentment upon completing a level, only an immediate compulsion to grind through the next crisis. Isaacson concludes that Musk's visionary achievements and destructive, toxic behaviors are inextricably intertwined. While his uncompromising intensity enables commercial space dominance and electric vehicle scaling where bureaucratic institutions falter, it exacts a severe toll in human collateral, severed relationships, and persistent psychological instability.

精炼阅读摘要

传记作家Walter Isaacson指出,Elon Musk颠覆性的商业与工程成就,根植于其童年遭受的严重心理创伤、阿斯伯格综合征特质以及对危机的病态渴望。这种心理机制赋予他突破常规的极限专注力,但同时也让其管理风格充斥着破坏性的人际摩擦与情绪暗流。 童年创伤与戏剧性冲突的心理根源 (7:50) Isaacson观察到,Musk的人格深受在南非成长时期的暴力与创伤塑造。在学校,由于阿斯伯格综合征导致社交沟通能力欠缺,他曾被霸凌致住院4天;在家庭中,其父亲Errol Musk不仅缺乏安慰,反而逼他在身前站立两小时并怒斥其为窝囊废。尽管Errol性格如“化身博士”般喜怒无常,且后来因与带大的继女育有两子而给家庭造成深重心理创伤,Musk在父母离异后仍选择搬回与父亲同住。其弟Kimbal Musk分析称,Musk在潜意识中将痛苦与爱紧密相连。Isaacson认为,这种经历让Musk形成了主动寻求对抗与动荡的心理机制,其成年后的情感关系与商业运作均不断重演这种混乱。 第一性原理与极端制造工程导向 (3:22) 在工作聚焦上,Isaacson将Musk与Steve Jobs进行了对比:Jobs痴迷于产品概念与外观设计细节,而Musk则将约80%的心力倾注于“制造机器的机器”,即生产线优化与基础工程。Musk早年攻读物理学与商业双学位,核心动机是拒绝被不懂底层科学的技术外行管理。创办SpaceX时,他在俄罗斯购买二手火箭受挫后,通过计算火箭燃料、碳纤维和Inconel等原材料成本,发现其仅占成品价格的一小部分,据此推导出通过第一性原理可将制造成本压缩至十分之一。Musk坚持认为除了物理定律,任何行业规范与监管政策都仅是建议。他的五步工程法(“The Algorithm”)要求逐一问责制度制定者、极力删减多余步骤,并将工程师办公桌直接设在生产线旁,甚至要求员工在负责的火箭部件上签名以倒逼极限降本。 高压动员模式与企业文化的破坏性重塑 (29:43) Musk推崇高压管理,视“心理安全感”为企业死敌,坚信紧迫感才是核心原则。在接管Twitter(现X)时,他面对原有的瑜伽室和注重心理关怀的企业文化表示嗤之以鼻,迅速将员工规模缩减80%,要求留下的人进入全天候高强度工作状态。在基础设施调整中,面对工程师需要6个月拆除Sacramento服务器机房的意见,Musk直接将期限压到6天,并在平安夜携带从Home Depot购买的钢丝钳和折叠刀亲临现场剪断线缆,动用U-Haul卡车搬移设备。在SpaceX的Starbase基地,他曾因周五夜间发射台工人不足而启动紧急“动员令”,连夜从外地抽调100名员工堆叠火箭。Isaacson指出,Musk抱持“若没有20%的失败率就说明冒险不足”的哲学,这种极端手法虽促成了惊人创新,但也带来了巨大的人员损耗与心理创伤。 宏大生存使命与个人情绪漩涡的交织 (55:39) Musk常年承受着自身寿命与人类意识存亡的紧迫感。他自15岁起便担忧人类意识的独特性及单行星文明的脆弱性,将殖民火星视为给人类文明留存备份的崇高探险。尽管年过五旬的他估算自己大概还有30年寿命,并力争在10至30年内启动火星任务,但他却对同行的长寿饮食与作息嗤之以鼻,常年忽视健康管理,饮食不规律且极少运动。Grimes曾将其周期性陷入的极度抑郁、多疑或攻击性状态形容为“恶魔模式”,Musk本人也承认自己可能患有躁郁症,有时会自毁式地“向自己的脚开枪”。此外,长女Jenna的彻底决裂并拥抱反资本主义立场,被Musk称为继长子夭折后人生承受的最大痛苦,这在很大程度上加剧了他在意识形态上对所谓“觉醒文化”的抨击。 对孤独的恐惧与牺牲幸福的成就执念 (73:49) 在个人生活与内心追求上,Isaacson明确表示Musk绝非一个快乐的人,他也从不把平静或享受生活列入人生考量。前妻Talulah Riley曾指出Musk缺乏停下来享受成果的能力,Musk本人则将这种状态比作通关电子游戏:每攻克一个难关,便立刻陷入开辟下一关的焦虑中。这种特质导致他在商业上不断自我颠覆,却也让其生活始终无法抽离出高压场域。与此同时,源于南非童年时期的孤立感让他对孤独产生极度恐惧,促使他在工厂和火箭发射现场频繁让子女陪伴左右。Isaacson总结认为,Musk那些被外界诟病的残酷、冲动等负面特质,与其颠覆工业制造的非凡才华深层交织,客观上构成了不可分割的统一体。 Isaacson认为,Musk的成功建立在其无法被常规模仿的心理特质之上。对于依赖突破性创新的工程领域而言,这种不计代价的破坏性领导力确实推翻了传统官僚体系,但Musk将痛苦与使命深度捆绑所带来的人力代价、企业动荡以及个人精神健康危机,构成了这种颠覆模式下无法消除的内在矛盾。

Detailed notes — zh

## Background 本期内容由 YouTube 播客频道《The Diary Of A CEO》(主持人 Steven Bartlett)于 2023 年 11 月 30 日发布。节目邀请了曾为史蒂夫·乔布斯和埃隆·马斯克撰写传记的著名作家沃尔特·艾萨克森(Walter Isaacson),深入剖析马斯克的童年创伤、恶魔模式、极限领导力以及他改变人类文明走向背后的驱动力与巨大代价。 ## TL;DR 艾萨克森基于长达两年的贴身近距离观察,揭露了马斯克在南非童年遭受校园霸凌和父亲心理虐待的惨痛经历,解释了他为何会形成将痛苦与爱绑定、主动拥抱混乱的极端人格。访谈详述了马斯克践行第一性原理与“五步工作法”的典型案例,包括平安夜强行剪断服务器线缆、午夜突击动员组装星舰,以及收购 Twitter 带来的文化震荡与争议。艾萨克森深入对比了马斯克与乔布斯的异同,指出他们都极度蔑视“讨人喜欢”的软弱心态,凭借严苛的现实扭曲力场逼出极限创新。最终,对话落脚于成功与幸福的真谛,探讨了颠覆世界的先驱背后难以承受的人性伤痕,以及普通人如何在认清自我中寻找超越个体的更高使命。 ## Atmosphere & style 整场对话沉稳睿智却又充满心理悬疑片的张力,艾萨克森以一流历史学家的冷静客观与亲历者的温情,撕开了当代科技巨擘的光鲜外壳。巴特利特敏锐深刻的追问与艾萨克森生动惊险的现场还原相得益彰,叙事在冷酷暴戾的工程突击、令人窒息的家庭阴影与仰望火星的崇高宿命感之间自如穿梭。聆听全程仿佛置身于天才的大脑风暴与孤独深渊边缘,带给人一种既被硬核执行力深深震撼、又为登顶者内心苦难感到唏嘘的复杂情感共鸣。 ## Bulletin - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=0s) 传记作家沃尔特·艾萨克森贴身跟访马斯克两年,指出其幼年在自闭症谱系特征与家庭心理虐待的双重影响下,形成了将痛苦与爱绑定并持续沉迷于危机与动荡的极端心理机制。 - [01:20:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=4810s) 马斯克践行以第一性原理为核心的五步工作法(质疑每项需求、精简删除、提速流程、优化改进、最后自动化),并主张容忍20%的失败率以保持激进的试错速度。 - [34:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=2086s) 马斯克收购Twitter并非单纯的商业扩张,而是受长女变性并与资本主义决裂的情感创伤触发,叠加对“觉醒思想病毒”的极端警惕,最终因误将社交舆论平台当成纯工程系统而引发剧烈动荡。 - [50:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=3018s) 乔布斯与马斯克均视“渴望被喜爱”为领导者的软弱虚荣,认为颠覆性领袖必须打破同僚温情,通过设定看似不可能的极限工期制造“突击”,以激发团队突破潜能。 ## Key takeaways - [07:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=470s) 马斯克的童年创伤与阿斯伯格综合征特征,塑造了他情感输入输出迟钝但能对复杂工程高度聚焦的极端心理特质。 - [10:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=646s) 马斯克的人格深处存在“恶魔模式”,这既是他冷酷无情和剧烈情绪起伏的根源,也是逼迫团队突破工程物理极限的非理性驱动力。 - [22:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=1368s) 普通人无法靠后天意志模仿马斯克,其超乎常人的狂热紧迫感、危机成瘾倾向和极端聚焦能力来自天生神经机制与家庭逆境的特殊结合。 - [25:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=1544s) 第一性原理思考要求剥离一切行业惯例、监管制度与历史协议,直接击穿到底层物理定律,世间唯有物理法则不可逾越。 - [41:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=2485s) 马斯克极度厌恶传统大企业的心理安全感与温和文化,在接管Twitter与管理SpaceX时均推行7×24小时连轴转的硬核休克疗法。 - [01:10:59](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=4259s) 颠覆型领导者通常具有“现实扭曲力场”,通过故意设置荒谬的工期充当“强制推进器”,把“绝无可能”转变为“仅仅是严重延期”。 - [01:06:41](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=4001s) 马斯克与乔布斯共同执着于“看不见之美”,坚信无论是初代Mac机箱内部优美的电路走线,还是火箭发动机内部隐秘的机械构造,真正的工匠精神绝不在不可见之处妥协。 - [55:39](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=3339s) 马斯克的人生动力来自于对“保护人类意识火种”与跨行星生存的深刻执念,而非追求个人享乐或财富累积。 - [01:03:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=3801s) 在人才与组织架构上,乔布斯擅长打造能自我运转的传奇高管梯队,而马斯克是事必躬亲、难以真正分权的绝对主宰,其团队中底层流动率极高。 - [57:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=3469s) 马斯克在日常中对自身健康管理荒谬且缺乏自律,其深层精神世界伴随周期性的情绪低谷、躁狂崩溃与自毁倾向。 - [01:16:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=4584s) 马斯克与贝索斯是充满敌意的商业死敌,马斯克公开批评贝索斯沉溺于奢华游艇和度假,导致蓝色起源在轨道竞赛中大幅落后。 - [01:20:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=4810s) 马斯克推行的工业“五步工作法”(算法)强调生产制造流程与产品设计同等重要,严禁将本该彻底删除的冗余流程实施自动化。 - [01:23:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=5023s) 在感情生活中,马斯克习惯将戏剧冲突与痛苦视为爱的证明,虽然骨子里极度害怕孤独、渴望伴侣与孩子陪伴,却无法耐受平静安详的生活。 - [01:26:36](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=5196s) 通往幸福与成功的关键在于“知晓你的使命并认清你自己”,伟大创新者的破坏性阴暗面与其造就的奇迹往往互为表里,不可盲目照搬。 ## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=0s) 序幕:近距离观察全球最具颠覆性的商业领袖 作为世界上唯一一位长年近距离贴身追踪过史蒂夫·乔布斯(Steve Jobs)与埃隆·马斯克(Elon Musk)两位当代商业巨擘的传记作家,沃尔特·艾萨克森(Walter Isaacson)见证了他们鲜为人知的真实一面。他直言,凡是他写过的那些颠覆时代的创新者,内心深处几乎无一例外都盘踞着驱使他们狂奔的“心魔”(demons)。然而马斯克的成长经历尤为残酷:一个生长在自闭症谱系上、身材瘦弱、毫无社交技巧与朋友的南非男孩,童年时期不仅饱受校园霸凌的毒打,回到家中还要承受心理施虐式家庭环境的无情折磨。长达两年的晨昏相伴,艾萨克森才终于撬开马斯克紧闭的心门,让他吐露了关于父亲的黑暗过往。正是先天神经特质与童年创伤的结合,塑造了马斯克对戏剧性冲突与危机近乎病态的痴迷。 这种极端的心理机制直接映射在马斯克的商业决策之中。在收购 Twitter(现 X)后,马斯克认定需要彻底裁撤其中一个数据中心,但工程师团队坚称绝不可行。马斯克当场解雇了相关负责人,甚至在平安夜带着一把剪线钳强行闯入服务器设施,亲手剪断了通向服务器的线缆。这种狂暴的举动常常令团队精神濒临崩溃,却也逼迫所有人完成原本被视作不可能的奇迹,因为马斯克将自己80%的核心心智全部投入到了这种硬核执行中。 在访谈开篇,主持人史蒂芬·巴特利特(Steven Bartlett)向观众提出了深层追问:这些改变世界的天才究竟需要付出怎样的代价与牺牲?他们如何在危机中思考与决断?巴特利特同时与听众订下约定:频道观众中有近 58% 尚未订阅,他承诺只要观众按下订阅键,团队将把节目持续升级为融入丰富影像资料的纪录片级高水准深度对谈。 --- ### [03:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=202s) 与21世纪最伟大的大脑朝夕相处 艾萨克森回顾了自己写作生涯中记录的几位核心创新者:首先是史蒂夫·乔布斯,他凭借友好的个人电脑和装在口袋里的上千首歌曲将人类带入数字革命,艾萨克森曾在他身旁贴身观察了整整两年;其次是珍妮弗·杜德纳(Jennifer Doudna),她因共同发明基因编辑技术 CRISPR、赋予人类改写自身 DNA 密码的能力,将人类推向了生命科学革命的新纪元;随后,下一个顺理成章的研究对象便是埃隆·马斯克,他正凭借太空探索、电动汽车以及人工智能技术重塑人类文明的未来走向。 当艾萨克森向马斯克提出跟访意向时,马斯克已经读过他的几部著作。艾萨克森当面提出苛刻的立项条件:“我不想只做五到十次例行专访,我要的是连续两年贴身跟随你,无论早中晚,只要我想看,我就要在场;而且,出版前我不会给你看书稿,你对内容没有任何审查和控制权。”令艾萨克森惊讶的是,马斯克毫不犹豫地回答“可以”。通过共同好友的牵线促成,艾萨克森意识到马斯克内心深处存在强烈的“超级英雄情结”(superhero complex),极度渴望在世界舞台上扮演宏大角色,并且热衷于将自己毫无保留地置于透明聚光灯下,自认与乔布斯、杜德纳处于同样的时代历史序列之中。 艾萨克森渴望记录马斯克的另一个核心原因,是他怀揣着对阿波罗时代火箭升空倒计时(10、9、8……)的情结与对太空探索时代的向往。当美国国家航空航天局(NASA)与波音公司(Boeing)都无法独立将美国宇航员送入预定轨道时,马斯克的 SpaceX 却成为了唯一具备该能力的实体。与此同时,艾萨克森看重马斯克推动可持续能源系统的坚决——不仅涵盖电动汽车,还包括太阳能屋顶与 Powerwall 储能系统。艾萨克森评价马斯克是一位极其卓越的实体工程大师,对物理工程拥有本能的敏锐直觉,但对人类情感却极度迟钝与无知,这也就是为什么他在制造火箭和电动车上战功赫赫,而在涉足 Twitter 这种人际情感与社交网络平台时却混乱不堪。 在跟访的深度与形态上,马斯克与乔布斯截然不同: ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 乔布斯与马斯克的关注重心及工作模式对比 accDescr: 展现乔布斯偏向美学概念与设计细节,而马斯克偏向产线制造与制造机器的机器 subgraph Jobs["史蒂夫·乔布斯 (Steve Jobs)"] J1["美学设计与概念定义"] --> J2["Jony Ive 设计工作室"] J2 --> J3["死磕细节:如充电插头的弧度与优雅性"] J3 --> J4["工作模式:每隔数月随访一周"] end subgraph Musk["埃隆·马斯克 (Elon Musk)"] M1["实体制造与工程执行"] --> M2["驻扎总装车间与流水线"] M2 --> M3["制造机器的机器:Raptor 猛禽发动机 / 电池单元"] M3 --> M4["工作模式:每月贴身随访三至四周,朝夕不离"] end ``` - **跟访乔布斯的日常**:艾萨克森常常住在乔布斯后院的客房中,大约每两到三个月随访一周。乔布斯的全部心神聚焦于产品的纯粹美学与概念构想。他们会耗费漫长的下午,与乔尼·艾夫(Jony Ive)在苹果总部的设计工作室里一遍遍踱步,反复推敲欧洲与美式电源插头的优雅曲率与细微弧度,坚信“上帝存在于细节之中”。 - **跟访马斯克的日常**:艾萨克森每月会有三到四周全程待在马斯克身边,大量时间是在喧嚣的工厂生产线上度过的。马斯克将 80% 的硬核心智投入到“制造机器的机器”(the machines that make the machines)——从 Raptor 猛禽火箭发动机的制造公差,到 4680 电池单元的量产工艺,再到特斯拉自动化总装线的设计。 --- ### [07:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=470s) 异类、创伤与童年心魔 巴特利特指出,探究任何伟大商业领袖的底层逻辑都必须溯源至童年,童年时期的成长烙印往往会终生支配其成年行为。艾萨克森深表赞同,并指出他笔下几乎所有改变历史进程的颠覆型人物,童年无一例外都是彻头彻尾的“异类”(misfits): - **列奥纳多·达·芬奇(Leonardo da Vinci)**:出身于托斯卡纳小镇的私生子,未被父亲赋予合法身份,左撇子、同性恋,注意力极度容易涣散,正是在这些内心心魔与不合群特质的驱策下,他选择逃离文奇村奔赴佛罗伦萨。 - **阿尔伯特·爱因斯坦(Albert Einstein)**:在反犹情绪暗流涌动的德国长大,在传统死板的体制中格格不入。 - **史蒂夫·乔布斯(Steve Jobs)**:自幼被亲生父母遗弃送养,经历了被第一个收养家庭退回的动荡,终其一生都在与被遗弃感抗争。 在所有人之中,埃隆·马斯克童年在南非所经历的创伤最为惨烈残忍。自幼身处自闭症谱系的他完全缺失处理人际交往与社交情绪的“输入/输出通道”,瘦小羸弱、没有一个朋友,沦为校园霸凌的日常靶子。一次,他被校内恶霸残酷殴打并推下混凝土台阶,重伤住院整整四天。然而,肉体上留下的疤痕与其回到家中遭遇的精神折磨相比微不足道。出院回到家中后,马斯克的父亲埃罗尔·马斯克(Errol Musk)强令重伤未愈的埃隆在自己面前足足站立两个小时,指着他的鼻子怒骂他是一个无可救药的窝囊废(loser),宣称挨打全是他自己的过错,并公开站到施暴者的立场上为霸凌者辩护。 艾萨克森将其比喻为古老神话与英雄史诗中最具悲剧色彩的叙事原型:年轻的超级英雄为了对抗原力的黑暗面而苦苦挣扎,最终却绝望地发现眼前的达斯·维达(Darth Vader)竟然就是自己的亲生父亲。每个人或多或少都有童年的心魔在背后驱使自己前行,但最核心的命题在于:究竟是你成功驾驭了心魔,还是心魔反过来绑架了你?对于马斯克而言,答案是两者兼而有之。巴特利特对此引述了迈克尔·乔丹(Michael Jordan)与科比·布莱恩特(Kobe Bryant)的传奇训练师蒂姆·格罗弗(Tim Grover)的观点:每个人内心都并存着光明面与黑暗面,它们互为表里、共生共长,巨星身上那种超越常人的伟大光芒,往往与他们身上最阴暗冷酷的特质孕育自同一片土壤。这恰恰构成了马斯克传奇人生与整部传记最深层的矛盾内核。 ### [10:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=646s) 光明与黑暗交织的“恶魔模式” 埃隆·马斯克(Elon Musk)的性格中,光明与黑暗紧密交织在一起,两者发源于同一处根源。这种内在的张力有时会让身边的人发疯,但有时又会逼迫他们做到原本以为不可能达到的极限。马斯克的前女友格莱姆斯(Grimes)将这种状态称为“恶魔模式”(demon mode)——在那个状态下,马斯克整个人会变得极其冰冷,陷入极度糟糕的精神世界。然而,如果强行把马斯克身上的这些阴暗面抽离掉,或许最终也就无法成就今天的埃隆·马斯克。正如莎士比亚的名言所说:“即使最伟大的人物,也是由瑕疵塑造而成的(Even the best are molded out of faults)。”无论是在迈克尔·乔丹(Michael Jordan)、科比·布莱恩特(Kobe Bryant)还是马斯克身上,都能看到这种特质。 传记作家沃尔特·艾萨克森(Walter Isaacson)在近距离跟访马斯克整整一年后,才终于撬开他的心防,让他谈论自己的父亲埃罗尔·马斯克(Errol Musk)。艾萨克森指出,像詹姆斯·博斯韦尔(James Boswell)当年撰写《约翰逊传》(Life of Samuel Johnson)那样日复一日地贴身观察极其重要。在这一年里,艾萨克森多次问起马斯克的童年与父亲,但马斯克总是眼神空洞地呆坐着,完全不愿开口。直到有一天,在从得克萨斯飞往加利福尼亚的私人飞机上,机舱内一片寂静,艾萨克森大约第20次问出这个问题。马斯克沉默了整整两三分钟,随后终于倾泻而出,讲述起童年记忆中那些挥之不去的阴影。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 复杂性格的形成结构 accDescr: 展示马斯克家庭童年创伤与工程天赋如何共同塑造他的恶魔模式与驱动力 subgraph Origin["父亲埃罗尔·马斯克 (Errol Musk) 的双重影响"] T["童年创伤与心理虐待<br/>(如与继女结合生子)"] E["卓越的工程天赋与动手能力"] end subgraph Internal["复杂人格特质"] D["黑暗面:恶魔模式 (Demon Mode)<br/>冷酷无情、剧烈情绪起伏"] L["光明面:极高工程专注力<br/>对材料科学与第一性原理的痴迷"] end subgraph Outcome["行为与动力驱动"] R["将痛苦与爱绑定<br/>主动拥抱混乱与危机"] end T --> D E --> L D --> R L --> R ``` ### [12:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=776s) 埃罗尔·马斯克与“化身博士”式的双重人格 马斯克与其父亲的关系极为残酷,目前两人已彻底断绝往来。艾萨克森也曾与埃罗尔长谈多次,至今仍保持着联络。让马斯克精神受到巨大冲击的一件事是:他的父亲埃罗尔抚养了一位继女长大,后来竟然与这名继女结合,并生育了两个孩子。埃罗尔本身是一位天赋异禀的优秀工程师,在马斯克的童年时期给予了他很多积极的启发,但也把极深的心理梦魇植入了马斯克的脑海中。 艾萨克森引用了贝拉克·奥巴马(Barack Obama)回忆录中的洞见:“每一个成功的男人,要么是在竭力达到父亲的期望,要么是在竭力洗刷父亲犯下的罪过。”对奥巴马而言两者皆有,而马斯克也是两者的结合体。在与埃罗尔的交谈中,艾萨克森发现埃罗尔就像史蒂文森小说里的“化身博士”(Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde)——正常时是一位才华横溢的智者,但会毫无征兆地瞬间切换成恶魔般的“海德先生”;当他清醒切换回“杰基尔医生”时,对刚才发生的恶行甚至毫无记忆。埃罗尔自己也承认自己会经历这种人格分裂般的波动,而令人震惊的是,这种极具破坏性的心理波动在马斯克身上同样能看到影子。 ### [14:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=883s) “散养”式育儿与对风险的脱敏 谈及如何培养一个具有强大心理韧性的孩子,艾萨克森感叹现代父母往往过度溺爱与保护。回看马斯克在南非的成长经历,那完全是一种野蛮生长的“散养”状态: - 马斯克在11、12岁时,父亲就给了他一辆摩托车到处骑行; - 他可以在没有任何成年人看管的情况下四处游荡,即使在外面被其他孩子殴打,父母也从不过度干预。 这种家庭模式在马斯克自己身上得到了延续。马斯克现有10个孩子,他对孩子们极其上心甚至可以说是痴迷,但他对待孩子的安全防线却与众不同。艾萨克森分享了两个关于马斯克幼子小X(X Æ A-12)的真实细节: - 有一天半夜,马斯克在现场亲自督战特斯拉太阳能屋顶(Solar Roof)的安装,整个人处于极度亢奋的超频工作状态,现场到处都是裸露的电缆和重型工程设备,而当时年仅三岁的小X就在这些危险的机械与电缆之间穿梭玩耍; - 史上最大火箭“星舰”(Starship)首次轨道级试飞在发射约3分钟后解体爆炸。试飞结束后,马斯克与母亲梅耶·马斯克(Maye Musk)、女友格莱姆斯以及小X围坐在得州星舰基地发射台后的火坑边喝酒交谈。小X当时就在火坑边玩火,往火里乱扔东西。艾萨克森本能地想冲上去护住孩子,马斯克却淡定地对艾萨克森说:“我小时候,大人们总说‘别玩火柴’,于是我就拿了一整盒火柴躲在树后面玩个痛快。” 梅耶·马斯克在一旁总结道:“这就是一代冒险家在训练下一代冒险家。”这让习惯了直升机式育儿的艾萨克森反思,或许现代社会确实应该给孩子更多承担风险的空间。 ### [17:16](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=1036s) 将痛苦等同于爱:主动奔向火场的渴望 马斯克父母离异后,母亲梅耶为了抚养孩子不得不身兼三职,常常不在家,无法时刻看护马斯克。然而令人难以理解的是,马斯克在少年时期却主动选择搬去和有心理虐待倾向的父亲一起生活。连梅耶至今都无法理解这一决定,而马斯克的弟弟金博尔·马斯克(Kimbal Musk)道破了玄机:“他把痛苦和爱联系在了一起(He associates pain with love)。”马斯克自己也承认:“逆境塑造了我,让我成为了今天的我。”因此,马斯克的人格深处有着对戏剧性冲突和“冲入火场”的本能渴望。 主持人与艾萨克森探讨了童年环境对成年选择的投射——人们往往会无意识地复制童年的生存环境,因为熟悉感比健康与否更能带来安全感。马斯克在成年后也不断在商业和生活中重现他童年在种族隔离时期的南非所经历的动荡、暴力与虐待。与马斯克不同,艾萨克森在充满温情的新奥尔良长大,至今仍住在离出生地几个街区的地方。艾萨克森坦言,这种幸福稳定的童年让他更适合做一个冷静的观察者,而不是像乔布斯(Steve Jobs)或马斯克那样的颠覆者(disruptor)。艾萨克森回忆自己在海湾战争期间掌管CNN,那虽然也是极高压的“竞技场”,但战事一过,他便选择退下来写书。虽然糟糕的童年并不一定会100%催生出伟人,但童年时期那种“必须证明自己”的压抑感和需要被驾驭的心魔,往往是驱使这些超级颠覆者不知疲倦奔跑的非零驱动力。 ### [21:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=1261s) 极端偏科与对技术的极致专注 艾萨克森在书中记录了一个打破常规认知的细节:马斯克并不是那种传统意义上的全优生。无论是在南非的男子学校还是后来的大学申请中,他的SAT成绩虽然过得去,但远没有达到满分800分的级别。马斯克的智力表现出极端的聚焦性: - 对他不感兴趣的学科,他完全提不起劲,比如在学校学南非荷兰语(Afrikaans)时甚至直接挂科; - 但一旦是他感兴趣的工程领域,特别是材料科学,他能像激光一样聚焦在材料的物理特性与工程难题上; - 这种疯狂的专注力在马斯克童年接触到个人电脑时再次爆发,凭借着自学,他在短短几天内就彻底掌握了编程。马斯克成长的时代正是个人计算机刚刚走入个人视野的黎明期,正是这种极致专注让他与史蒂夫·乔布斯、比尔·盖茨(Bill Gates)等人一样,牢牢抓住了技术革命的脉搏。 ### [22:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=1343s) 自学编程与母亲眼中的天才少年 在个人电脑刚刚走进家庭的年代,年幼的埃隆·马斯克就拥有一台可以插电并在家编程的电脑。他自学了 C++ 和 Pascal 等编程语言,并在大约十二三岁时独立编写了一款名为《Blastar》的太空射击视频游戏并成功售出。自那时起,他便彻底沉迷于两件事物:计算机与视频游戏。 马斯克的母亲梅耶·马斯克(Maye Musk)在对待他的方式上十分独特。她并非那种整天围着孩子转、时刻提供无微不至关怀的直升机式父母,但早在马斯克五六岁时,她便坚信自己的儿子是个天才。当学校老师抱怨马斯克在课堂上注意力涣散、成绩不佳、总是望向窗外发呆时,梅耶会毫不客气地与校方据理力争,直斥道:“那是因为他是个天才,而你们给他的挑战远远不够。”即便到了今天,梅耶依然坚定地认为他是一个不世出的天才。 ### [22:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=1368s) 狂热的专注力:普通人能否成为埃隆·马斯克? 面对“普通人是否能通过自我选择而成为埃隆·马斯克”的提问,沃尔特·艾萨克森给出了断然否定的回答。艾萨克森曾撰写过本杰明·富兰克林的传记,他指出,富兰克林或许不是美国建国先驱中最聪明的一个——论智力他比不上亚历山大·汉密尔顿或托马斯·杰斐逊——但他拥有极其纯粹的好奇心、开放的胸襟和敏锐的洞察力,这种品质是普通人可以通过后天意志去努力靠拢的。然而,人们无法靠自我强求成为爱因斯坦,也无法成为马斯克。马斯克身上那种近乎病态的专注力、狂乱的紧迫感与高压驱动力,绝非多喝五十杯咖啡或在大脑植入电击棒就能获得的特质。 这种极端的心理机制既源于深层的童年创伤,也源于其生物学特质: - **自闭症谱系特征**:马斯克公开谈及自己患有阿斯伯格综合征,这导致他在人际情感层面的“输入与输出信号”极度迟钝,缺乏正常的情感接收器。 - **极客式的极端聚焦**:在面对工程、数学或编程难题时,他能爆发出超乎常人的精细专注力。 - **成瘾于动荡与剧变**:从生理机制到童年创伤经历,多重因素交织,塑造了一个对混乱与危机极度上瘾、情绪在多重人格状态间剧烈波动的复杂个体。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 马斯克极端驱动力的成因 accDescr: 展示塑造马斯克极端专注力与人格特质的内在与外在驱动因素 subgraph Causes["核心成因"] A["童年创伤经历"] B["自闭症谱系 / 阿斯伯格综合征<br/>(情感输入输出信号迟钝)"] C["生理硬件特质<br/>(天生的高强度聚焦倾向)"] end subgraph Traits["外在行为特征"] D["极客式数学与工程聚焦"] E["狂热的紧迫感与高压执行"] F["对动荡与危机的成瘾倾向"] G["剧烈的情绪波动与多重人格切换"] end Causes --> Traits ``` ### [25:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=1544s) 第一性原理思考与对规则的打破 离开南非后,马斯克在大学同时攻读了物理学和商学双学位。这一罕见的学科组合背后有着极为务实的考量:他坦言自己绝不想为一个完全不懂科学的商科生打工;同时,如果自己不懂商业逻辑,最终也难免落入受制于人的境地。 这种底层认知正是他“第一性原理”(First Principles Thinking)的具象体现。在马斯克的世界观里,第一性原理意味着在面对任何难题时,必须彻底剥离现存的所有行规、惯例、流程与类比隐喻,直接击穿到底层的物理学规律。除了无可争议的物理学定律,世间一切规则、制度与协议都不过是“建议”而已: - **自造火箭的成本核算**:年轻时的马斯克曾远赴俄罗斯试图购买二手洲际导弹改装火箭,却遭遇对方的轻视与漫天要价。在返程的飞机上,他直接运用第一性原理计算一枚火箭所需的原材料成本——因科镍合金(Inconel)、碳纤维与推进剂燃料分别值多少钱。当发现原材料成本仅占火箭整机售价的一小部分时,他意识到只要能将制造成本压缩十倍,自主造火箭完全切实可行。 - **质疑冗余设计**:当特斯拉工程师声称某款车底盘必须贴上一块特殊隔音毡垫时,马斯克的首要反应就是质问对方:“支撑这一做法的底层物理学原理究竟是什么?” 马斯克极度厌恶那些阻碍创新的条条框框、监管制度以及回避风险的平庸之辈。在他看来,美国本身就是一个由冒险家建立的国家——无论是乘坐“五月花号”前来的清教徒、偷渡里奥格兰德河的移民,还是逃离东欧压迫的难民,他们的祖辈都在押上性命冒险。然而如今的社会却充斥着规避风险的官僚、律师和繁文缛节,监管者与设立护栏的人远远多于真正愿意发射火箭的开拓者。重回第一性原理,正是为了跳出这些束缚,以超乎常人的胆魄去计算并承担风险。 ### [28:41](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=1721s) 疯子才能改变世界:与史蒂夫·乔布斯的共鸣 在谈到史蒂夫·乔布斯是否具有类似的特质时,艾萨克森指出,乔布斯虽然并不像联合创始人史蒂夫·沃兹尼亚克那样精通底层硬件工程,但两人在颠覆精神上有着惊人的一致。乔布斯当年重返苹果公司时,耗费了整整十年才力挽狂澜重塑苹果帝国。 乔布斯亲自操刀了著名的《非同凡想》(Think Different)广告大片。那则致敬爱因斯坦等颠覆性巨匠的广告词,恰好是对乔布斯与马斯克共同精神内核的绝佳注解:“向那些疯狂的家伙致敬。他们特立独行,桀骜不驯,格格不入。他们是用不同视角看世界的人……因为只有那些疯狂到以为自己能够改变世界的人,才真正改变了世界。” ### [29:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=1783s) 平安夜强拆服务器:马斯克式的极端执行力 在跟随马斯克期间,艾萨克森目睹了数十次他与下属因“能否达成目标”而爆发的激烈冲突。其中最具代表性的一次发生在他收购 Twitter 不久后的圣诞节前夕。 当时马斯克在 Twitter 旧金山总部审查工程架构,发现公司在波特兰、萨克拉门托和亚特兰大设有三处数据中心服务器集群。经过快速计算,马斯克认为维持三个互为冗余的服务器集群毫无必要,要求直接关停萨克拉门托的数据中心。在场工程师坚决反对,声称为了灾备和缓存绝不能撤除,如果要迁移至少需要耗费六个月。 马斯克在会议室中的脸色瞬间阴沉下来,冷酷地将期限压缩到六周;面对工程师们的抗拒,他最终在会末直接下达最后通牒:“六天之内搞定。”随后,他在12月23日——距离圣诞节仅剩两天时,毫不留情地解雇了这批工程师。 次日平安夜,马斯克带着两名身为工程师的年轻表亲乘私人飞机从旧金山飞往得克萨斯州奥斯汀回家过节。当飞机飞跃内华达州上空时,其中一名表亲随口提议:“我们为什么不干脆自己去把那些服务器搬出来?”马斯克随即命令飞行员空中掉头,直飞萨克拉门托。 下机后,这支仅有四人的突击小队租了一辆 U-Haul 货车直奔数据中心: - **强行破门**:面对在平安夜突然闯入并强行进入机房的马斯克一行,当值的安保人员完全目瞪口呆。 - **就地取材拆除线缆**:机房工程师表示拆除需要专业人员掀开架空防静电地板。马斯克转头向保镖借了一把折叠折刀,直接撬开通风口掀掉地板,随后拿着从家得宝(Home Depot)临时买来的剪线钳钻入地板下方,亲手剪断了服务器电缆。 - **人肉搬运**:他们合力将重型服务器搬出机房,直接塞进租来的 U-Haul 货车车厢。 在强行断开萨克拉门托机房后的几天里,Twitter 的服务性能确实出现了一定程度的降级,但随后系统成功恢复稳定运转。马斯克对此总结出一条极具侵略性的工程冒险法则:“如果你承担的风险没有导致 20% 的问题发生,那就说明你承担的风险还远远不够。”这一举动彻底震撼并淬炼了整个团队对极限执行力的认知。 ### [33:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=1982s) “宁可燃尽也不愿平庸”:星舰基地的午夜突击与严苛文化 埃隆·马斯克对团队的要求极其残酷,只有大约 20% 到 30% 的人能够忍受这种“一同穿越火海”的极致压迫感,并见证他所创造的奇迹;而这也正是马斯克接管 Twitter 后 80% 的员工离职或被裁的根源所在。沃尔特·艾萨克森在书中记录了一个极具代表性的场景:在得克萨斯州南端的星舰基地(Starbase)发射场,某个周五晚上 10 点过后,马斯克巡视发射台时脸色骤变,质问道:“为什么这里只有三四个人在工作?” 负责现场的年轻工程师安迪·克拉布(Andy Crabb)解释称,当时已是周五深夜,且近期并未安排任何发射任务。但马斯克瞬间进入阴沉的暴怒状态,厉声命令道:“明天我要看到 100 个人在这里干活。把他们从加利福尼亚、佛罗里达立刻调过来,我们要立刻组装这枚火箭——即使近期不发射,我们也要搞一次所谓的‘突击动员’(surge)。”工程师们随即被紧急空运至现场,许多人为了连夜拼凑火箭甚至直接睡在厂房的地板上。 安迪·克拉布顶住压力完成了那次突击,但不久后他还是选择了辞职。他对艾萨克森坦言,自己的孩子即将出生,实在无法承受马斯克无休止的疯狂折磨。然而仅仅过了不久,艾萨克森在洛杉矶进行新书宣讲时,克拉布却再次出现在台下。他告诉艾萨克森,自己辞职回到洛杉矶后虽然换了一份轻松体面的工作,但最终发现自己“宁可被彻底燃尽,也不愿无聊平庸”,并且已经主动联系马斯克请求重返 SpaceX,因为他实在无法割舍参与星际事业的宏大宿命感。 - **极高的人才淘汰率**:约 70% 到 80% 的员工无法适应马斯克的极端管理,但留下的核心队伍拥有极高的忠诚度与执行力。 - **“突击战役”(Surge)机制**:在没有明确发射节点的情况下,通过人为制造危机和极致紧迫感,强制团队跨州调动、连夜攻坚,以此拉升研发极限速度。 --- ### [34:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=2086s) 意识形态突变:长女变性与“觉醒思想病毒”带来的切肤之痛 近三四年来,马斯克的政治立场发生了剧烈转变。他曾是一个典型的“中左翼”人士,不仅向奥巴马阵营捐过款,还在总统大选中投票给拜登;然而近年来,他却对所谓的“觉醒思想病毒”(woke mind virus)产生了极端的敌意与执念。艾萨克森指出,导致马斯克思想右倾化有多重诱因,但其中最深切、最具决定性的诱因来自其家庭内部的情感撕裂。 马斯克的大儿子以《X战警》中的“X教授”(Xavier)命名。大约三年前,16岁的孩子发来一条通知,宣布自己已经决定变性,改名为珍娜(Jenna),并特意强调“不要告诉我父亲”。马斯克虽然努力去理解并接受女儿变性的事实,但珍娜随后走向了极端激进的极左反资本主义立场,厌恶所有亿万富翁,认为“资本主义即盗窃”,并彻底与马斯克断绝关系、更改了姓氏。艾萨克森强调,马斯克亲口承认,除了长子在婴儿期夭折之外,“没有任何事情比女儿对他的彻底决绝更让他感到痛苦”。 马斯克将这场家庭悲剧部分归咎于女儿曾就读的洛杉矶极具进步主义色彩的名校克罗斯罗兹学校(Crossroads School)。这种强烈的个人伤痛,叠加他对加州疫情期间过度封控的不满,以及对激进性别议题的反弹,最终促成了他在政治观念上的剧烈演变。这种带有反叛与反体制色彩的思维模式,在某种程度上也映射了他父亲埃罗尔·马斯克那套充斥着阴谋论、质疑疫苗与权威的认知底色。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 马斯克政治立场转向与收购推特的内在诱因 accDescr: 描绘长女变性决裂与外界政治环境如何共同促使马斯克立场激化并最终走向收购Twitter subgraph 家庭创伤 ["深层个人创伤"] A["长女 Jenna (原 Xavier) 变性"] --> B["全盘接受激进反资本主义思想"] B --> C["完全否定并断绝父女关系<br/>(更改姓氏,视巨富为罪恶)"] C --> D["马斯克遭受巨大精神打击<br/>(痛苦程度仅次于长子夭折)"] end subgraph 外部刺激 ["外界与环境因素"] E["进步主义名校教育 (Crossroads)"] --> F["对'觉醒文化'产生极度警惕"] G["加州疫情严苛封控政策"] --> F H["父亲 Errol 遗留的怀疑主义倾向"] --> F end D --> I["形成清除'觉醒思想病毒'的执念"] F --> I I --> J["决定买下 Twitter,改造核心舆论场"] ``` --- ### [38:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=2280s) 荒诞的收购开端:在权力巅峰制造动荡与致命盲区 2022 年 4 月,马斯克迎来了人生的绝对巅峰:他是全球首富、《时代》周刊与《金融时报》的双料“年度风云人物”,仅那一年 SpaceX 就完成了 33 次火箭发射与安全回收复用,得克萨斯超级工厂(Giga Texas)也落成开工。就在奥斯汀工厂尚未正式对外开放的夹层办公室里,马斯克却对艾萨克森表示,他的生活中“依然需要更多戏剧性与冲突”,他无法忍受平稳与满足。于是,他宣布了一个让所有亲友震惊的决定:“我要收购 Twitter。” 包括他的弟弟金博尔(Kimbal Musk)、儿子格里芬(Griffin)以及身边的核心挚友在内,几乎所有人都在极力劝阻他,质疑这是否会严重分散他在特斯拉和 SpaceX 上的精力。在一旁默默记录的艾萨克森同样认为这是一场灾难,因为马斯克存在一个致命弱点——他极度缺乏对“人类细腻情感”的感知力与同理心。当艾萨克森质问他为何要碰 Twitter 时,马斯克给出了一个典型的工程师解释:“这是一个产品问题,他们缺乏优秀的工程技术,没有新功能,甚至不支持高清长视频,所以这是一个工程挑战。” 然而艾萨克森一针见血地指出,Twitter 根本不是纯粹的工程产品,而是一个广告与舆论生态平台;它的核心逻辑是在一个友好、安全的社交环境中汇聚注意力并变现,而这恰好是马斯克最不擅长的领域。事实证明,这次收购对马斯克的公众声誉造成了毁灭性冲击,特别是在进步主义受众群体中,其争议言论也直接反噬了特斯拉的平价大众汽车销售;所幸 SpaceX 依然凭借高强度的专注推进着星链卫星发射与星舰试飞,受到的干扰相对有限。 - **生活需要“戏剧性”(Drama)**:马斯克无法安于功成名就,危机感与混乱是他体内不可或缺的神经递质。 - **认知错位**:将 Twitter 视作代码与功能缺陷的“工程系统”,却严重低估了其作为舆论场所需的社交同理心与广告主关系维护。 - **企业影响分化**:SpaceX 凭借严密工程闭环维持了高频发射进度;但特斯拉的公众形象因 Twitter 上的意识形态论战而严重受损。 --- ### [41:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=2485s) 扔进大楼的手榴弹:Twitter 的“心理安全”与极限狼性重塑 马斯克接管 Twitter 前夕,艾萨克森曾陪同他走进 Twitter 旧金山总部大楼。当时的 Twitter 文化代表了硅谷企业关怀的另一个极端:公司内部配备了静音休息室、瑜伽室、手工精品咖啡吧,随处强调对员工心理能量的呵护。当人力资源团队向马斯克介绍公司如何尊重并保障员工的“心理安全感”(psychological safety)时,马斯克发出了标志性的沙哑冷笑,直接粗暴地驳斥道:“去他的心理安全感,极致的紧迫感(urgent intensity)才是我们的行动纲领,心理安全感就是我们的敌人。” ```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: Twitter收购前后的两种极端企业文化碰撞 accDescr: 对比Twitter原先的温和关怀模式与马斯克硬核极限动员模式 subgraph 原Twitter文化 ["原 Twitter 模式:温和关怀"] direction TB A1["核心理念: 心理安全感 (Psychological Safety)"] A2["办公环境: 瑜伽室、静音区、手工咖啡"] A3["运作节奏: 注重情绪抚慰与工作生活平衡"] end subgraph 碰撞契机 ["马斯克接管 (Culture Shock)"] direction TB B1["驳斥核心原则: '心理安全感是创新的敌人'"] B2["强制要求: Hardcore 极限全情投入协议"] end subgraph 马斯克模式 ["马斯克模式: 极限制压"] direction TB C1["核心理念: 极致紧迫感 (Urgent Intensity)"] C2["工作状态: 24/7 全天候在线、通宵黑客松"] C3["组织规模: 削减 80% 人员,保留极小规模精锐"] end 原Twitter文化 --> 碰撞契机 --> 马斯克模式 ``` 马斯克彻底粉碎了原有的温和机制,强推全员极限投入的“Hardcore”(硬核)办公模式。他要求员工必须接受 7×24 小时高强度工作、周末连轴转的高压黑客松文化。他的逻辑是:宁愿只要一支规模缩减至原先 20% 的精简团队,也必须确保这批人具备高出一个数量级的狂热投入度与执行力。 史蒂文·巴特利特提出,许多拥有数万名员工的大型企业由于文化僵化、创新停滞,在面临市场颠覆时往往因船大难掉头而坐以待毙;马斯克这种宛如“直接在大楼里引爆手榴弹”的激进休克疗法,究竟是否具有合理性?艾萨克森给予了肯定,但同时强调了其背后极其惨烈的代价。正如特斯拉前总裁约翰·麦克尼尔(John McNeill)等人所言,马斯克通过极端破坏力砸出了常人无法企及的突破与奇迹,但身后留下的往往是支离破碎的废墟、严重的人际损伤与心理创伤——这或许是追求极端颠覆所必须付出的高昂代价,但绝不是大多数人有勇气去承受的人生选择。 ### [44:20](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=2660s) 颠覆性领导力:从《时代》周刊的温室到 CNN 的困局 沃尔特·艾萨克森(Walter Isaacson)在谈及埃隆·马斯克(Elon Musk)严苛甚至近乎残酷的领导风格时指出,马斯克制造的情感动荡代价极高,但不可否认的是,像 SpaceX 工程师安迪·克雷布斯(Andy Krebs)这样的人,恰恰渴望这种高强度的挑战与精神震荡,甚至离开后还千方百计想回去工作。为了阐明这种企业文化差异,艾萨克森回顾了自己早年在传统媒体担任高管的经历。在 20 世纪 90 年代掌舵《时代》(Time)周刊时,那正是纸媒未受互联网冲击、财源滚滚的黄金年代。办公环境奢华到令人难以置信:每天下午 5 点有巡回推车为撰稿人现场调制鸡尾酒,晚间供应烤牛肉餐车,周末还有专职林肯轿车(town cars)接送员工去乡间度假别墅。这种安逸优渥的环境注定要被颠覆,但在当时确实令人流连忘返。 随后艾萨克森调任 CNN 担任董事长兼 CEO。在海湾战争期间,CNN 凭借清晰的战地报道目标运转得极具方向感;但战争硝烟散去后,这家庞然大物暴露出如同老旧战舰般的迟钝与冗员问题,急需一场大刀阔斧的“深度颠覆”。然而,艾萨克森坦言自己天生做不来那种冷酷无情的颠覆型领袖,他根本无法像马斯克那样毫不手软地直接裁掉 80% 的员工。他坦承,CNN 当时其实需要一个比自己果断凶狠得多的掌舵者。 - 1990 年代《时代》周刊福利:下午 5:00 鸡尾酒推车巡回服务、晚间烤牛肉推车、周末专车接送员工去度假别墅。 - 互联网兴起对综合纸质刊物造成毁灭性冲击,使原本高枕无忧的传统媒体被迫面临生死转型。 - CNN 在海湾战争结束后陷入体制臃肿的瓶颈,亟需像马斯克式的大规模人员清退与组织重构。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 组织文化与领导风格对比 accDescr: 展示温和协作型与极端颠覆型两种完全不同的组织运作逻辑。 subgraph 温和安逸型组织["温和安逸型文化(如 1990s 时代周刊 / 早期 CNN)"] A["高福利与安全感"] --> B["注重员工舒适度与人情味"] B --> C["缺乏危机感与快速迭代能力"] C --> D["遭遇外部颠覆时极难自救"] end subgraph 极限颠覆型组织["极限颠覆型文化(如 SpaceX / Tesla)"] E["高压危机感驱动"] --> F["全天候高强度黑客松模式"] F --> G["残酷淘汰与快速筛选(淘汰率极高)"] G --> H["实现颠覆性创新与极致效率"] end ``` --- ### [45:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=2756s) 领导者的自我认知:“天鹅绒手套”与“铁拳” 面对当今人工智能与机器人技术的爆炸式发展,斯蒂芬·巴特利特(Steven Bartlett)提出,企业是否必须以前所未有的速度颠覆自我。艾萨克森认同颠覆正在席卷各行各业——不论是保险公司、律所、银行还是医疗企业,全都需要经历变革。但他强调,颠覆并不意味着每家公司都必须生搬硬套那种全天候黑客松、周末通宵加班的极端压榨文化。这就如同疫情后的远程办公政策一样,企业各有生存之道:有的依靠远程办公吸纳全球精英,有的则坚信必须面对面协作。领导风格同样没有单一的标准答案,像史蒂夫·乔布斯(Steve Jobs)、早期的比尔·盖茨(Bill Gates)、杰夫·贝佐斯(Jeff Bezos)或马斯克,选择成为严厉甚至霸道的混蛋;而像诺贝尔奖得主珍妮弗·道德纳(Jennifer Doudna)乃至本杰明·富兰克林(Benjamin Franklin),则是依靠友善、协作与感染力来聚拢团队。艾萨克森认为,任何 CEO 能够得到的最佳忠告,正是古希腊德尔斐神庙上刻着的那句人类最古老的箴言——“认识你自己(Know Thyself)”,明确自己的处事舒适区并发挥所长。 谈及自己无法扮演冷血混蛋的性格,艾萨克森分享了一段与乔布斯的犀利对话。乔布斯曾当面直戳痛处,说艾萨克森永远无法成为最顶级的领袖,原因就在于他总习惯戴着“天鹅绒手套(velvet gloves)”去管人。乔布斯尖锐地评价:“你总戴着天鹅绒手套,一门心思想让身边的人感到舒服。但我必须让他们感到不适,必须让他们直面极限挑战。我没有容忍平庸之辈(B players)和溺爱他们的奢侈。”艾萨克森深知自己更适合打造一个让人心安、进而迸发创造力的环境,但他同时也意识到,一支优秀的领导团队必须懂得刚柔并济。就像芯片巨头英特尔(Intel)早期的三驾马车:鲍勃·诺伊斯(Bob Noyce)是全天下最友善随和的 CEO,会把办公桌摆在大平层正中央拥抱员工;戈登·摩尔(Gordon Moore)是深邃的技术远见者;而真正让芯片按时按量生产下线的,是铁腕治军、严厉残酷的安迪·格鲁夫(Andy Grove)。任何企业的高管班底,既需要指明方向的仁慈智者,也必须有一柄执行到底的“重锤”。 - 乔布斯对艾萨克森领导风格的经典定性:“戴着天鹅绒手套”,总试图讨好员工、维护表面和谐。 - 乔布斯的核心管理原则:绝不容忍平庸之辈("no luxury of tolerating B players"),用制造不适感来逼出极致表现。 - 英特尔早期管理架构黄金组合:鲍勃·诺伊斯(亲和力与文化象征)、戈登·摩尔(愿景与摩尔定律提出者)、安迪·格鲁夫(铁血执行的“重锤”)。 --- ### [50:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=3018s) 讨好他人即是软弱:马斯克与乔布斯的管理哲学 当被问及乔布斯与马斯克如何看待“领导者是否需要被下属喜欢”这一问题时,艾萨克森明确表示,这两人都将“渴望被喜爱”视作致命的缺陷与软弱。在他们看来,如果你太在乎别人喜不喜欢你,你就不可能做到真正的颠覆。马斯克甚至直截了当地宣称:“共情心与同僚之情(collegiality)是你的敌人。”乔布斯也曾毫不留情地讽刺艾萨克森:“你自以为非常富有同理心、顾及他人感受,但有时候你走得太远了,这其实是出于你内心的虚荣(vanity)。你只是太虚荣了,渴望别人喜欢你,太在意一起工作的人爱不爱你——但这绝不是打造一家颠覆性机构的方式。” 艾萨克森坦白承认乔布斯说得完全正确。在管理 CNN 时,他整天担心某些刺头主播对自己的看法,生怕得罪他们,极力想让每个人都满意,结果证明自己确实不够强硬。后来他想通了“认识你自己”的道理,确认自己不适合这种职场斗争。他的性格更亲近珍妮弗·道德纳在发明 CRISPR 基因编辑技术时的团队运作模式:在道德纳的实验室或衍生公司里,哪怕只是招聘一名在离心管和移液枪旁打下手的研究生,整个团队都会亲自面试并共同讨论该候选人能否融洽融入集体。这种文化深受艾萨克森认同。然而在马斯克的世界里,这简直不可理喻。艾萨克森曾亲眼目睹马斯克在公司里冲着财务人员大发雷霆,只因财务人员与工程团队私交甚好。马斯克当场咆哮:“同僚之情是你们的敌人!你们绝不能指望他们喜欢你们!你们的职责是去挑战他们、卡死指标。如果他们太喜欢你们,说明你们根本没有尽职!” - 乔布斯对追求“讨人喜欢”的定性:本质上是一种追求好人缘的私心与“虚荣”(vanity)。 - 马斯克管理禁忌:严禁财务或审核岗位与工程技术团队打成一片,强调“同僚之情是敌人”,必须保持审查与制衡的压迫感。 - 道德纳的 CRISPR 实验室采用全员合议制,以团队契合度和人际舒适感为招聘前提,与马斯克的狼性风格形成鲜明反差。 --- ### [52:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=3163s) 奔向火星的狂热:忠诚、淘汰与午夜海风下的演讲 针对马斯克的员工到底爱不爱他,艾萨克森解释说,这种关系极端分化。那些在马斯克非人体能消耗下生存下来的核心大将——例如 SpaceX 总裁格温·肖特维尔(Gwynne Shotwell)、特斯拉动力总成副总裁德鲁·巴格利诺(Drew Baglino)以及首席设计师弗朗茨·冯·霍兹豪森(Franz von Holzhausen)——绝对愿意“为他冲破南墙”(walk through a wall for him)。但马斯克消耗人才的速度极其惊人,一家公司经历几年洗礼,最终只有大约 20% 的幸存者能保持绝对忠诚并留下来,马斯克对把人逼到极限导致倦怠离职毫无心理负担。对于员工来说,要么全身心膜拜并追随,要么不堪忍受彻底离开。 艾萨克森再次提到工程师安迪·克雷布斯(Andy Krebs)的例子:这类人虽然一度被折磨到离开,却往往会因为怀念那种极限挑战而重新回归。正如乔布斯当年说服百事可乐高管约翰·斯卡利(John Sculley)加入苹果时的传世名言:“你是想卖一辈子糖水,还是想跟我一起改变世界?”马斯克同样具备这种让人甘愿受虐的现实扭曲力场。艾萨克森曾目睹在半夜十二点的火箭工厂与发射台前,工程师们通宵达旦地疲惫苦干,马斯克面对众人发表即兴演说:“我知道你们有多辛苦。但这是全世界最令人兴奋的工作,是地球上最重要的使命——把人类送上火星。至于第二兴奋的工作是什么?你甚至都想不出来,因为没有任何事情能与我们正在做的相比。”艾萨克森感叹,在那一刻,看着墨西哥湾升起的明月,听着马斯克的演说,你完全能理解为什么有人会对此甘之若饴;但同时,你也能理解为什么许多普通人宁愿准时在周五下午 5 点下班、回家陪伴妻儿。 当被问及马斯克口中的使命是否只是作秀时,艾萨克森斩钉截铁地表示,马斯克是发自内心地彻底相信这一切。起初,当马斯克向艾萨克森列举他的三大终极使命——将人类送往火星成为跨行星物种、加速全球向可持续能源转型、以及确保人工智能/机器人的安全——艾萨克森一度以为这只是企业领袖在播客访谈或动员大会上夸夸其谈的高调口号。然而在深入贴身观察后,艾萨克森发现马斯克每天在厂房巡视时,甚至会对着自己自言自语。只要一看到产线或研发出现严重纰漏,马斯克就会眼神失焦地凝视远方,像被梦魇缠身般喃喃自语:“这样我们永远到不了火星……如果我们不解决这个,人类就永远去不了火星,世界也永远无法迈向电动车。”这种对太空探索与人类命运的执念,早已深深烙印在他的神经深处。 - 长期留在马斯克身边的核心高管幸存者包括:格温·肖特维尔(SpaceX 总裁)、德鲁·巴格利诺(Tesla 技术高管)、弗朗茨·冯·霍兹豪森(Tesla 首席设计官)。 - 严酷淘汰机制:团队在数年内的高压运转下,通常仅有约 20% 的高抗压人才能够存活并保持长期效忠。 - 马斯克的三大执念使命:让人类定居火星、实现全球可持续能源、确保 AI 及机器人的安全。他在日常遭遇技术挫折时,常陷入对无法达成火星使命的自语与极度焦虑中。 ### [55:39](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=3339s) 为什么执着于太空:保护人类意识火种与伟大的冒险 埃隆·马斯克之所以将星际探索视为终极使命,主要源于两到三个根本原因。首先,他深信人类意识在宇宙中极其罕见,甚至可能是独一无二的。我们迄今没有在宇宙其他地方发现任何意识存在的迹象,而在马斯克看来,即使某些星球曾孕育过意识,也极有可能在发展成跨行星物种之前,就随着母星的灾难而彻底毁灭了。这种对“人类意识之火熄灭”的恐惧并非普通人每天醒来会操心的事情,但马斯克从十五岁起,就一直在为地球遭遇不测导致意识终结的危机而忧心忡忡。 其次,马斯克认为探索太空是一场属于全人类的“伟大冒险”。人们每天清晨醒来,不得不面对各种各样的现实泥潭与争端——从俄乌冲突、中东战火,到美国国会或英国白厅的政治纷争。但人类若要保持其之所以为人类的特质,就必须将目光投向那些能够带来启发与崇高感的事物。在马斯克眼中,没有什么比踏上未知征途、开辟全新边疆更令人振奋,而太空中正是最宏大的新边疆。这一目标绝非为了赚钱;如果一个人的目标仅仅是成为世界首富,“创办一家火箭公司绝对不是第一步”。 然而,这种宏大愿景也伴随着强烈的紧迫感与死亡焦虑。马斯克如今已年过五十,常常在脑海中飞速盘算:自己或许只剩下三十年左右的寿命。他本人并不一定非要亲自登上火星,但他极度渴望在有生之年看到火星任务成为现实。马斯克坚信十年内就能实现火星任务,但他对时间的预测往往会乐观两到三倍——无论是全自动驾驶落地的速度、Cybertruck 的交付时间,还是登陆火星的日程。艾萨克森认为,三十年内人类发射火星任务是完全可能的,但十年内希望渺茫,而正是这种预期与现实的时间差,让马斯克时刻承受着巨大的焦虑。 --- ### [57:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=3469s) 严苛的使命与荒谬的健康管理:芝士汉堡与不锻炼的矛盾 如果马斯克真的一直在用“第一性原理”精确推演自己的寿命与火箭工程的研发进度,那么按常理推断,他理应通过严格管理自身健康来为自己争取更多时间。然而滑稽的是,马斯克对健康的态度与他的火星宏图形成了鲜明反差。他不仅对养生毫无热情,甚至常常公开嘲笑硅谷那些痴迷于长寿方案、试图通过精密计划活到极高年龄的“科技极客”(tech bros)。如今的马斯克体型明显超重,对自身健康的关照少之又少。 艾萨克森分享了一段令人啼笑皆非的亲身经历。大约一年前,马斯克曾尝试进行轻断食(间歇性禁食),并配合注射了市面上流行的减肥药物。由于实行严苛的断食方案,他每天只能吃一顿饭。某天早晨,艾萨克森和马斯克带着年幼的孩子 Lil X(X Æ A-12)一同前往加州帕洛阿尔托的一家名为 Palo Alto Creamery 的美式餐厅。马斯克坐下后,直接点了一份双层培根芝士汉堡、一份炸红薯条,以及一杯奥利奥巧克力碎奶昔,随后轻描淡写地表示:“好了,这就是我今天唯一的一餐。”艾萨克森在旁暗自思忖:虽然自己不是营养学专家,但这绝对算不上减肥或保持健康的明智之道。 与其他科技领袖相比,马斯克的这种生活方式显得尤为割裂。例如,OpenAI 的萨姆·奥特曼(Sam Altman)在日常饮食和体育锻炼上都保持着极高的自律;而马斯克虽然在工程、造火箭和造车等无数事情上表现得近乎狂热,却绝不可能主动踏上跑步机。在女儿变性并彻底倒向反资本主义立场后,马斯克曾幻想只要变卖名下的五处豪华房产、过上极其节俭的生活就能挽回女儿的心,但这并未奏效。如今他常住在得克萨斯州南部星际基地(Starbase)附近一栋简陋的两居室小房子里。屋里的一间小房间内放着一台椭圆机,艾萨克森日复一日陪他在屋里工作时,马斯克偶尔会瞥一眼它,咕哝一句“也许我该多用用那玩意儿,我都没怎么动过它”。艾萨克森从未见过他真正去健身房,他也从不练习冥想、瑜伽或游泳这类既能放空心智又能放松身体的活动。 --- ### [01:00:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=3649s) 喜怒无常的精神状态:低谷、崩溃与深夜的自毁倾向 在谈及马斯克的心理健康状况时,艾萨克森用了一个词来形容——“喜怒无常”(mercurial)。马斯克在日常中会穿梭于多种截然不同的人格和心境阶段:有些时候他情绪高昂、富有感染力、幽默风趣,全神贯注于精妙的工程细节;但在另一些时刻,他又会骤然跌入其前女友格莱姆斯(Grimes)所称的“恶魔模式”(demon mode)。马斯克本人曾坦言自己大概患有双相情感障碍(躁郁症)。尽管他从未接受过正式的确诊,但他一直在服用处方药物来应对情绪剧烈波动引发的躁狂与抑郁发作。艾萨克森在撰写传记时始终在思考一个艰难的问题:这种极度不稳定的心理特质,究竟在多大程度上与他的惊人成就交织在一起?是否正是这些潜藏的阴暗面,赋予了他不可思议的狂热驱动力? 在长期近距离的观察中,艾萨克森多次为马斯克的精神状态感到担忧,甚至感到他正滑向失控的恶性循环(tailspin): - **2018 年特拉斯产能地狱的彻底崩溃**:在艾萨克森与他相识之前,马斯克在 2018 年便经历了一场全面的精神危机。当时他整个人陷入近乎紧张性木僵(catatonic)的状态,直接瘫倒在特斯拉位于加州弗里蒙特工厂的地板上,身边的员工甚至无法叫醒他。伴随精神崩溃的,是他在推特上密集发射的自毁性言论——从毫无根据地辱骂英国洞穴潜水员为“恋童癖”,到引发监管大地震的“考虑将特斯拉私有化”推文。 - **深夜的黑暗自毁模式**:即便到了近期,这种暗黑冲动依然周期性发作。马斯克经常在深夜陷入极其阴郁的心境中,在推特上发布充斥着阴谋论、偏执且极具破坏性的推文。 - **自残式行为的悔意**:在某一年的圣诞节聚会上,马斯克与弟弟金巴尔(Kimbal Musk)及其他亲属围坐在一起闲聊(正是马斯克亲自动手从数据中心拔出服务器网线的第二天)。当被家人问及“这一年你最后悔的事情是什么”时,马斯克神色复杂地回答:“我最后悔的是,自己总会时不时地开枪打自己的脚,或者拿刀捅自己的大腿。” --- ### [01:03:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=3801s) 人才选拔与团队构建:马斯克与乔布斯的异同 对于企业而言,人才是最根本的支柱。在招揽顶级人才的理念上,马斯克有着一套极其严苛的标准。他明确指出,招聘时首先考察的永远是“态度”:专业技能和知识都可以通过后天培养来掌握,但要改变一个人的态度,除非给他做“脑移植手术”。因此,他必须确保进入团队的人具备彻底投入、毫无保留的“硬核”(hardcore)作风。在 SpaceX 和特斯拉创立的前几年,每一位员工的入职面试都必须由马斯克亲自把关。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Comparison of Talent Strategies accDescr: Visual flowchart comparing the leadership and team-building strategies of Elon Musk and Steve Jobs. subgraph MuskApproach["埃隆·马斯克 (SpaceX / Tesla)"] direction TB M1["招聘核心标准:硬核态度 (All-in Attitude)"] --> M2["技能后天可学,态度不可逆转"] M2 --> M3["极度中心化领导:事必躬亲,难以充分授权"] M3 --> M4["核心高管稳固,但中底层人员流动频繁"] end subgraph JobsApproach["史蒂夫·乔布斯 (Apple)"] direction TB J1["视团队为最伟大的产品"] --> J2["打造可持续自我运转的高管梯队"] J2 --> J3["高效授权并依托传奇核心团队"] J3 --> J4["设计/运营/营销各司其职,延续苹果传奇"] end ``` 在团队构建的长期表现上,马斯克与史蒂夫·乔布斯呈现出了显著的异同: - **马斯克的人才体系**:马斯克建立了一支能力极强但相对不稳定的队伍,中底层人员流动频繁。不过,他的核心层中也拥有长期并肩作战的定海神针,如执掌 SpaceX 运营超过二十年的格温·肖特维尔(Gwynne Shotwell)和工程高管马克·容科萨(Mark Juncosa);特斯拉内部也培养了朱晓彤(Tom Zhu)和德鲁·巴格利诺(Drew Baglino)等骨干。但马斯克在本质上是一个无法轻易下放权力的“绝对主宰”(total boss)。他做不到真正的分权,而是将偏执的狂热聚焦在极具体的细节上;不过正是这种对细节的严苛把控,使得 SpaceX 能够攻克波音(Boeing)等传统航天巨头无法解决的难题,顺利将火箭送入轨道。 - **乔布斯的人才理念**:乔布斯则是打造团队的超级大师。在他临终前,艾萨克森曾坐在乔布斯位于加州小院的后院里问他:“你这辈子做出的最优秀的产品是什么?”艾萨克森原本以为他会说是 iPhone 或是初代 Macintosh 电脑,但乔布斯回答:“制造那些产品固然很艰难,但真正重要的是打造一支能够持续制造伟大产品的团队。因此,我做过最了不起的事,就是打造了苹果的团队。”乔布斯构建了由乔尼·艾夫(Jony Ive)、菲尔·席勒(Phil Schiller)、埃迪·库伊(Eddy Cue)以及蒂姆·库克(Tim Cook)组成的传奇梯队,使得苹果在没有他的情况下依然能够稳定运转。 --- ### [01:06:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=3978s) 共同的领导力特质:对细节与看不见之美的偏执追求 在领导力底层逻辑上,马斯克与乔布斯有着极其深刻的共鸣,其中最突出的便是他们对“极致之美”近乎走火入魔的激情——尤其是对“隐藏在内部、他人看不见之部件”的审美偏执。 艾萨克森回忆起最初与乔布斯合作时的场景:乔布斯带着他走过自己童年生活过的加州一处普通联排房屋的后院,向他深情讲述了父亲当年教给他的工匠哲学。无论是电脑机箱内部整洁优美的电路板走线,还是火箭内部精密隐秘的机械构造,这两位划时代的创新领袖都拒绝在任何不可见之处妥协,坚信真正的工匠精神必须贯穿于产品的每一个微小细节之中。 ### [01:06:41](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=4001s) 极致的细节狂热:看不见的背面也要完美 史蒂夫·乔布斯曾带沃尔特·艾萨克森去看过一堵栅栏,并特意让他绕到面朝荒地杂草的栅栏背面。乔布斯回忆道,自己的父亲曾告诫他,栅栏的背面必须做得和正面一样美观。年幼的乔布斯不解地问:“为什么?根本没人看得到,没人会知道。”父亲回答:“是的,但你自己心里清楚。如果你对完美抱有激情,你就会连那些看不见的部分之美也在乎。”这种对隐蔽细节的偏执深刻影响了乔布斯——在设计初代 Macintosh 时,即便电路板封装在密封机箱内、普通用户绝无可能看到,他也强硬要求电路板上的芯片排布必须保持优雅美观。 埃隆·马斯克对细节同样有着超越常人认知的狂热。就在 Twitter 董事会正式接受他收购要约的当晚,马斯克并没有开香槟庆祝,而是在得克萨斯州南部荒凉小镇的星舰发射场泡了整整两个小时,通宵达旦地排查星舰猛禽发动机(Raptor engines)上一个导致甲烷泄露的微小阀门。无论是乔布斯还是马斯克,都坚信一种底层逻辑:唯有对微末细节倾注全神贯注的热情与极高强度,更宏大的成果才会自然而然地水到渠成。 ### [01:07:55](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=4075s) 疯狂试错与承受 20% 失败率的实验文化 马斯克之所以能够取得巨大成功,核心竞争力在于其超高速的迭代能力、冒险意愿以及通过高频实验获取数据的决心。当星舰进行了前两次试飞并在空中接连爆炸解体时,全球媒体次日的头条充斥着“马斯克发射火箭,升空即爆炸”的负面论调。然而在马斯克看来,这两次试飞都堪称巨大的成功。他有一句标志性的原则:“如果你没有遭遇 20% 的失败率,就说明你承担的风险还远远不够。”每一次发射都是为了将硬件推向极限,看它在何处断裂崩溃,找出故障根源并迅速修复。相比之下,NASA、波音(Boeing)或洛克希德·马丁(Lockheed)等传统巨头深陷规避风险的官僚文化之中,实验频率与进化速度根本无法与之相提并论。 面对团队可能产生的自满情绪与对风险的抗拒,马斯克依靠极致的高压与强硬手腕推平阻碍。在特斯拉与 SpaceX,内部员工曾激烈反对过无数激进构想: - **反对移除推特蓝标认证**:团队警告不可行,马斯克强行推行; - **反对改用不锈钢材质**:航天团队最初抗拒从碳纤维转向不锈钢合金,马斯克执意颠覆并将其做成了星舰的主体; - **反对 Cybertruck 赛博皮卡的设计**:团队抱怨其过于前卫锋利、不锈钢外壳看起来极其骇人会吓跑消费者,马斯克则直接下令将不锈钢打造为承载整车结构的外骨骼(exoskeleton),摒弃传统内部底盘; - **激进的技术与组织削减**:无论是在 Twitter 强行削减服务器机架与内容审核团队、试图完全以算法取而代之,还是推翻既有电池工艺架构,面对抗拒,马斯克不是将反对者就地解雇,就是直接碾压式推行。 虽然马斯克的这套激进打法也留下了满地狼藉(例如推特内容生态陷入混乱),但艾萨克森指出,他强推的事情有 80% 最终取得了惊人的突破与成功。 ### [01:10:59](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=4259s) 现实扭曲力场与充当“强制推进器”的疯狂工期 当主持人询问这些人是否处于一种“妄想(delusional)”状态时,艾萨克森引用了乔布斯的传世名言:“那些疯狂到以为自己能够改变世界的人,往往就是真正改变世界的人。”在硅谷术语中,这种特质被称为“现实扭曲力场”(Reality Distortion Field)。乔布斯会死死盯着工程师——不眨眼睛地凝视对方,运用他早年在印度修行学到的凝视法——平静而绝对地命令对方把电脑开机时间缩短 10 秒。当工程师声称“这违背物理规律”时,他只会说:“别害怕,你做得到的。”而工程师往往真的把现实给“弯折”了。虽然现实扭曲力场偶尔会彻底失效——例如乔布斯试图用意志力逆转胰腺癌,或者马斯克连续八年宣称“特斯拉完全自动驾驶(FSD)明年就能搞定”——但它确实逼迫团队走到了全世界的最前沿。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 现实扭曲力场与突击运作机制 accDescr: 展示马斯克如何通过不可思议的截止日期制造突击,逼迫团队达成不可能目标的流程 A["设定极限死线 / 不可能的目标<br>(现实扭曲力场)"] --> B{"团队认为不可能<br>(违背常理与现实)"} B --> C["亲自下场制造'突击(Surge)'<br>全员 24 小时连轴转"] C --> D["打破常规工程边界<br>榨取极限潜能"] D --> E["即便工期最终延误<br>'把不可能变为仅仅是严重迟到'"] D --> F["大幅领先行业竞争对手<br>实现颠覆性突破"] ``` 马斯克设置那些看似虚妄的截止日期,本质上是一种高明的“强制推进器(forcing function)”。艾萨克森曾当面与马斯克讨论他屡屡违背承诺的死线,马斯克坦诚回答:“是的,但我擅长将‘绝无可能’变成‘仅仅是严重延期’。”马斯克的团队每个月都会经历被称为“突击(Surge)”的极限动员: - **星舰总装突击**:马斯克要求团队必须在周五前将巨大的星舰堆叠总装完成。面对工程师“这需要几个月”的抗议,全员通宵达旦连轴转,最终不可思议地在周五完成; - **太阳能屋顶安装突击**:为了验证特斯拉 Solar Roof 的铺设速度,他限令团队在 24 小时内翻新完一整栋房子的屋顶。午夜时分,马斯克亲自爬上了屋顶,手里拿着一把小斧头亲自去排查下方的线缆。 这种极限施压将团队逼得几近崩溃,但也促使所有人达成了原本认为绝对不可逾越的目标。 ### [01:14:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=4443s) 永无止境的通关游戏:他从不把“幸福”排进前十 被问及马斯克是否快乐时,艾萨克森给出了斩钉截铁的否定回答。马斯克不仅自身并不快乐,更关键的是,他打心底里根本不看重“快乐”这回事。艾萨克森表示,如果让马斯克列出人生最重要的前十件事,幸福、享乐、平静、温存或是去海滩度假,绝对连前十名的边都沾不上。马斯克的前妻、英国女演员塔尔拉·莱利(Talulah Riley)曾评价道:“他根本不是那种能够停下来细嗅花香、享受生活的人,他绝不想坐在那里安于现状、享受惬意。” 马斯克曾亲口对艾萨克森剖析自己的内心状态:“我就像一个电子游戏成瘾者。每当我打通了游戏的一个关卡并取得胜利后,我满脑子想的全都是立刻进入下一关,无论是《艾尔登法环》(Elden Ring)还是《低模之战》(Polytopia)。”这种永不停歇的饥饿感与危机感与乔布斯如出一辙: - 乔布斯打造出划时代的电脑后,转头就想把“一千首歌装进口袋”; - 当 iPod 取得空前成功时,乔布斯没有陷入陶醉,而是日夜担忧那些“愚蠢的手机制造商”一旦开窍将音乐整合进手机,苹果就会被淘汰出局; - 面对 iPod 团队对其开发 iPhone 会“自相残杀”的抗议,乔布斯残酷地指出:“如果我们不自我吞噬,别人就会把我们当午餐吃掉。” 相比之下,杰夫·贝索斯(Jeff Bezos)拥有世界上最豪华的巨型游艇与无数奢华度假豪宅,懂得品味胜利与享受财富。然而,贝索斯的蓝色起源(Blue Origin)至今甚至尚未将任何宇航员送入地球轨道。马斯克虽然深知自己完全有能力在游艇上荒度余生,但他对此嗤之以鼻,那绝不是他向往的人生追求。 ### [01:16:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=4584s) 轨道争夺战:马斯克与贝索斯的死敌暗涌 马斯克与贝索斯之间绝非好友,而是充满火药味的商业死敌。艾萨克森在传记中专门写了两个章节详述两人之间的竞争与矛盾。双方不仅就卡纳维拉尔角历史悠久的 39A 发射台展开过正面争夺,还在近地轨道卫星频段层面打过激烈的诉讼官司。更令马斯克深恶痛绝的是,贝索斯曾试图将“火箭一级助推器垂直着陆并回收再利用”这一基础概念申请为自己的专利。 马斯克对贝索斯的评价极具挑衅性:“我希望贝索斯能取得成功,我希望他能共同推进人类进入太空,因为参与的人越多越好。但我真心希望他能少泡点热水澡,少花点时间待在他的奢华游艇上,这样蓝色起源才能走得更快一些。”尽管马斯克嘴下毫不留情,两人私下也绝不来往,但艾萨克森透露,马斯克内心深处对贝索斯依然保有对强劲对手的基本尊重。 ### [01:17:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=4643s) 乔布斯与改变一生的使命感:对产品的极致热爱 话题从埃隆·马斯克与杰夫·贝索斯之间的一桩专利纷争收尾切入——当时贝索斯试图为海上驳船回收火箭的想法申请专利,而马斯克早已在着手研发这项技术,这直接让马斯克勃然大怒(go ballistic)。所幸该争端后来得以化解,马斯克此后也未再因此对贝索斯大发雷霆。当主持人史蒂文·巴特利特问及“史蒂夫·乔布斯对你产生了怎样的改变”时,沃尔特·艾萨克森坦言,撰写乔布斯以及其他历史人物的经历,促使他开始更深层地思考何为“更宏大的使命”。乔布斯教会他去在意那些人们甚至肉眼看不见的事物,就如同初代麦金塔电脑(Mac)内部整洁优美的电路板布局一样。 艾萨克森强调,无论是写一本书、做一档播客还是创办一家公司,你自己心里永远最清楚到底有没有“偷工减料”(cutting corners)。能够对自己保持坦诚,是极致追求的基石。他由衷钦佩乔布斯对美和产品的狂热激情。这些伟大人物初衷并非为了赚最多的钱或打造市值最高的公司,哪怕苹果和特斯拉最终都成为了全球市值最高的巨头,他们也登上了世界首富的宝座。他们的出发点始终是对产品本身的热爱,而非对利润的痴迷。 - **不为人知的细节考究**:如同乔布斯坚持 Mac 内部看不到的电路板也必须设计得极具美感,真正的匠人绝不在看不见的地方投机取巧。 - **产品与利润的因果倒置**:把利润当目标往往落入平庸,把产品做到极致,商业上的巨额回报反而会成为顺带的结果。 --- ### [01:18:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=4724s) “认识你自己”:马斯克光环背后的巨大代价 谈及与马斯克朝夕相处的时光,艾萨克森再次引述古希腊箴言“认识你自己”(Know thyself)。他表示自己非常敬佩马斯克所取得的成就,但也清醒地意识到,马斯克为其成功所付出的代价,是自己绝对无法承受、也不愿去承受的。艾萨克森提到,自己拥有近四十年的美满婚姻,极为看重工作与生活的平衡,绝不会为了事业而对身边的人如此严酷暴躁;而马斯克对平衡这类事情根本不屑一顾。 在艾萨克森看来,每个人都必须找到让自己内心舒适的平衡点。旁观马斯克时,既能赞叹他惊人的专注度与强度,也必须看清其伴随而来的严重负面代价。而整本传记最核心、最复杂的内核恰恰在于:马斯克性格中那些暴躁、严苛的阴暗面,与其惊天动地的创新创造力是紧密缠绕在一起的,宛如织就同一件织物的不同丝线,根本无法割裂单取其一。 --- ### [01:20:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=4810s) 工业制造与工程哲学:马斯克的“五步工作法” 巴特利特询问了传记中提及的马斯克五步工作法(“The Algorithm”,算法)。他好奇这套方法是否只是马斯克雷厉风行、注重细节与紧迫感的延续。艾萨克森解释道,“算法”在本质上回归了第一性原理(First Principles),它是制造与工程思维的结晶: ```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: Elon Musk's Five-Step Algorithm accDescr: A flow diagram representing the five steps of Elon Musk's engineering and manufacturing process. subgraph S1["第一阶段:质疑与精简"] A["1. 质疑每项需求/规则<br/>(找到制定者追问物理依据)"] --> B["2. 精简与删除<br/>(剔除不必要的零件与步骤)"] end subgraph S2["第二阶段:提速与执行"] B --> C["3. 加快流程迭代<br/>(在精简后提升运转速度)"] C --> D["4. 优化改进<br/>(持续打磨关键环节)"] D --> E["5. 自动化<br/>(切忌自动化本该删除的步骤)"] end ``` 第一步是质疑每一条要求与规则。当有人提出必须在汽车电池与底盘之间加装毛毡垫,并搬出“这是规定”为借口时,马斯克会立刻刨根问底:“这规定是谁定的?把那个人的名字找来,我要亲自质询他,看看背后到底有没有真实的物理法则支撑。”第二步是简化,艾萨克森将其比作乔布斯在设计 iPod 时的极简执念——乔布斯要求点按不超过三次就能播放任何歌曲,不要冗杂按键,不要说明书,最终演变出任何人都不需要看说明书就会使用的 iPhone。马斯克工作法的后续则是提速、优化,以及最后的自动化。马斯克常警告道:最愚蠢的错误就是试图将那些原本应该直接删除的流程自动化。 艾萨克森指出,这不仅是一套死板的规则,更是一种思维方式——在马斯克看来,“制造的过程与产品的设计同样重要”。因此,马斯克要求把工程师和设计师的办公桌直接搬到总装生产线正对面,让他们每时每刻都能看清装配瓶颈:无论是车灯边缘的密封条卡壳,还是猛禽火箭发动机(Raptor engine)内部复杂的线束走线导致停滞,工程师推门就能现场解决。马斯克从不赞同传统车企将制造全盘外包的做法。此外,他推行极端的责任制,要求员工在自己负责的火箭零部件上签下名字。如果某个阀门的成本必须降下 80%,负责人的名字就在上面;如果你觉得自己做不到,就立刻走人,因为“这项宏大任务绝不容忍不能同频作战的人”。 --- ### [01:22:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=4970s) 中场播客赞助:三年的营养代餐棒研发突破 播客中场插入了赞助商 Huel 的广告。巴特利特向听众介绍了他作为投资人参与的 Huel 品牌动态:历经三年研发,Huel 推出了一款全营养代餐棒。该产品具备高蛋白、含 27 种维生素与矿物质,且仅有 2 克糖分。巴特利特提到,市场上大部分高蛋白能量棒口感如同嚼橡皮泥或纸板,极难在兼顾全营养的同时做到美味,而这款代餐棒攻克了这一难题,完成了“不可能的任务”。 --- ### [01:23:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=5023s) 情感的剧烈动荡:迷恋戏剧冲突与骨子里的孤独 话题回到马斯克的私生活与亲密关系。艾萨克森剖析道,马斯克打心底迷恋戏剧冲突(drama)与动荡风暴。这源于他充满创伤的童年,使他在潜意识里将痛苦、动荡与“爱”绑定在一起。无论是在推特、SpaceX 还是特斯拉,他总是不断制造危机和战役,这种模式同样完整投射在他糟糕的情感生活里。 从第一任妻子贾斯汀(Justine Musk),到以关系极具破坏性戏剧张力而著称的艾梅柏·希尔德(Amber Heard),再到音乐人格莱姆斯(Grimes),马斯克几乎总是被性格烈焰般狂暴、充满冲突感的女性吸引。唯一的例外是英国女演员塔尔拉·莱利(Talulah Riley)。艾萨克森认为塔尔拉性格平和温顺、充满爱意,是马斯克感情生活中最美好的一抹宁静力量。然而,马斯克潜意识里始终渴求那种激烈动荡的刺激;而塔尔拉在清醒认清自我后选择离开,回到英国重过平静生活。这种对高压强度的病态迷恋,深植于马斯克与伴侣、甚至与孩子相处的每个维度。 然而,在这种高强度的外表下,马斯克却有着深入骨髓的“孤独恐惧症”。他曾向艾萨克森倾诉,自己童年时极其孤单无助,因此人生最大的恐惧就是落单。马斯克极度渴望身边有人陪伴,常常走到哪里都带着孩子:无论是火箭发射现场的 Griffin、小 X(X Æ A-12),还是他患有严重自闭谱系障碍、平时需要照看人员的孩子。正是这个孩子曾充满智慧地问他:“爸爸,为什么未来看起来不像未来的样子?”这句话深深触动了马斯克,成为他后来打造极具科幻未来感皮卡 Cybertruck 的灵感催化剂之一。马斯克害怕孤独、渴望伴侣与孩子的围拥,但他所能承受的关系里,却绝容不下“平静与安详”。 --- ### [01:26:36](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=5196s) 终极拷问:幸福与成功的核心究竟是什么? 节目录制尾声进入了该播客标志性的收尾传统——由上一位飞行嘉宾留下一道匿名的灵魂拷问。本期留给艾萨克森的问题是:“在见证了那么多伟大人物之后,关于如何度过幸福且成功的一生,你认为最关键的特质究竟是什么?” 艾萨克森沉思片刻后回答:“知晓你的使命,并且认清你自己(Knowing your mission and knowing yourself)。”他解释道,自己也是花了漫长的时间才真正认清自我——弄清楚自己在领导力上擅长什么,以及在哪些方面自己并不想去勉强擅长。虽然他的个人使命绝非像马斯克那样带领人类移民火星这般宏大无匹,但他深信,只要清楚自己的使命何在、内心珍视什么,幸福感就会自然随之而来。 面对巴特利特追问“那你的使命是什么”,艾萨克森深情地总结道,世间总有一些事物能够激发人类的崇高追求,让我们把目光投向更高处,变得更加卓越。而他作为一名记者、作家、传记作者以及历史学者,毕生的使命就是记录并讲述那些真正推动了历史前进、在时代湖面上激起层层巨浪的人物故事;并希望世人能从这些传奇先驱的经验与教训中汲取养分,在各自相对平凡的世界里,努力成为更好的自己。 ### [01:28:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=5293s) 超越自我的使命与讲故事的古老力量 沃尔特·艾萨克森(Walter Isaacson)在谈及人生的追求时指出,我们必须踏上一段不仅仅关乎自身利益的旅程。当他向大学毕业生演讲时,总能听到许多毕业典礼演讲者千篇一律地高呼“追随你的热情”。艾萨克森对此却直言不讳地反驳:“不,这根本无关你那微不足道的小小热情,而是关乎如何将你的热情与某种超越自我的崇高目标连接起来。”他告诫年轻人,必须弄清楚属于自己的使命究竟是什么,而他自己选择践行这一使命的方式,就是“讲故事”(storytelling)。 在艾萨克森看来,讲故事这项手艺表面上或许不像造火箭或造汽车那样具有震撼的工业与技术高度,但它却是人类历史上最古老、最受尊崇、也是最宝贵的价值观传承途径。从人类祖先在有史以来点燃的第一堆篝火旁围坐夜话,到荷马吟诵《奥德赛》(*Odyssey*),再到《圣经》以一句气势磅礴的“起初……”(In the beginning)拉开创世叙事,人类始终依靠故事来认识自我、传递火种。艾萨克森深信,优秀的讲述者在社会中承担着不可替代的职责,他们用生动真实的记录激励世人、促使人类变得更好。 ### [01:29:20](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=5360s) 传记的拼图与向伟人学习的艺术 主持人史蒂文·巴特利特(Steven Bartlett)对艾萨克森的角色与作品致以崇高的敬意。巴特利特坦言自己极少预购图书,但出于对艾萨克森以往作品的极高信任,他同时购买了埃隆·马斯克传记的实体书与有声书;而阅读体验更是远远超出了预期。这本书绝非那种浮于表面、保持距离的事后审计或冷冰冰的拆解,读者仿佛直接置身于马斯克的思维深处,跟随他的视角与脑回路去审视整个世界。对于正处于事业起步期、渴望成就一番大事业的年轻人来说,深入透彻地理解这些非凡人物,能够让人根据自身的特质汲取灵感与教训,从而拼凑出通往属于自己那份幸福与成功的“拼图”。 巴特利特强调,阅读艾萨克森的传记也是一次“认识你自己”(Know thyself)的深刻历练——读者需要从埃隆·马斯克、史蒂夫·乔布斯(Steve Jobs)或珍妮弗·杜德纳(Jennifer Doudna)等伟大创新者身上提取不同的性格碎片与方法论,补全属于自己的独特拼图,因为每个人的人生轨迹与形状各不相同。他赞誉这本书关于创伤、人性以及攀登世界之巅背后残酷代价的剖析达到了前所未有的深度,堪称各行各业读者的必读之作。在对话的尾声,巴特利特深情感谢艾萨克森为全人类记录这些珍贵历史所付出的心血,艾萨克森也真诚回应,表示能够在此相见交流同样是极大的荣幸与乐事。 ### [01:31:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=5462s) 赞助商插播与节目结语 在采访结束后的播客结语部分,巴特利特向听众分享了赞助品牌 Eight Sleep 的智能温控床垫套(Pod Cover)。他将其视作彻底改变自己生活品质的神器,因为该床垫能够根据人体在不同睡眠阶段的自然节律智能调节温度:入睡时保持凉爽,进入深睡阶段进一步降温,清晨唤醒前再适度回温,从而引导身体获得更深层、更具修复性的睡眠。 巴特利特表示,在所有的健康与体魄指标中,优质睡眠已成为他每天清晨首先查看的核心数据,直接决定了他当天的精力分配、训练强度、会议安排乃至就寝时间。最后,他为听众提供了专属折扣福利(访问 eightsleep.com/steven 可享 150 美元优惠),并引导喜爱本期对谈的观众点击节目简介中的链接,收听往期同样探讨颠覆性商业领袖的精彩访谈。 ## Notable quotes > [10:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=646s) 甚至最伟大的人物,也是由瑕疵塑造而成的。 — 沃尔特·艾萨克森 > [12:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=776s) 每一个成功的男人,要么是在竭力达到父亲的期望,要么是在竭力洗刷父亲犯下的罪过。 — 贝拉克·奥巴马 > [14:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=883s) 这就是一代冒险家在训练下一代冒险家。 — 梅耶·马斯克 > [17:16](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=1036s) 他把痛苦和爱联系在了一起。 — 金博尔·马斯克 > [28:41](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=1721s) 因为只有那些疯狂到以为自己能够改变世界的人,才真正改变了世界。 — 史蒂夫·乔布斯 > [29:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=1783s) 如果你承担的风险没有导致 20% 的问题发生,那就说明你承担的风险还远远不够。 — 埃隆·马斯克 > [41:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=2485s) 去他的心理安全感,极致的紧迫感才是我们的行动纲领,心理安全感就是我们的敌人。 — 埃隆·马斯克 > [45:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=2756s) 你总戴着天鹅绒手套,一门心思想让身边的人感到舒服。但我必须让他们感到不适,必须让他们直面极限挑战。我没有容忍平庸之辈和溺爱他们的奢侈。 — 史蒂夫·乔布斯 > [50:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=3018s) 同僚之情是你们的敌人!你们绝不能指望他们喜欢你们!你们的职责是去挑战他们、卡死指标。如果他们太喜欢你们,说明你们根本没有尽职! — 埃隆·马斯克 > [52:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=3163s) 你是想卖一辈子糖水,还是想跟我一起改变世界? — 史蒂夫·乔布斯 > [01:00:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=3649s) 我最后悔的是,自己总会时不时地开枪打自己的脚,或者拿刀捅自己的大腿。 — 埃隆·马斯克 > [01:03:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=3801s) 制造那些产品固然很艰难,但真正重要的是打造一支能够持续制造伟大产品的团队。因此,我做过最了不起的事,就是打造了苹果的团队。 — 史蒂夫·乔布斯 > [01:10:59](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=4259s) 是的,但我擅长将‘绝无可能’变成‘仅仅是严重延期’。 — 埃隆·马斯克 > [01:14:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=4443s) 如果我们不自我吞噬,别人就会把我们当午餐吃掉。 — 史蒂夫·乔布斯 > [01:26:36](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE&t=5196s) 知晓你的使命,并且认清你自己。 — 沃尔特·艾萨克森 ## Mentioned 埃隆·马斯克 (Elon Musk), 沃尔特·艾萨克森 (Walter Isaacson), 史蒂夫·乔布斯 (Steve Jobs), 史蒂芬·巴特利特 (Steven Bartlett), 埃罗尔·马斯克 (Errol Musk), 梅耶·马斯克 (Maye Musk), 金博尔·马斯克 (Kimbal Musk), 格莱姆斯 (Grimes), 珍妮弗·杜德纳 (Jennifer Doudna), 杰夫·贝索斯 (Jeff Bezos), 萨姆·奥特曼 (Sam Altman), 蒂姆·库克 (Tim Cook), 乔尼·艾夫 (Jony Ive), 格温·肖特维尔 (Gwynne Shotwell), 德鲁·巴格利诺 (Drew Baglino), 弗朗茨·冯·霍兹豪森 (Franz von Holzhausen), 朱晓彤 (Tom Zhu), 塔尔拉·莱利 (Talulah Riley), 艾梅柏·希尔德 (Amber Heard), SpaceX, Tesla, Twitter (X), Apple, Blue Origin, CNN, 《时代》周刊 (Time), 星舰 (Starship), Cybertruck, 猛禽发动机 (Raptor engine), Huel, Eight Sleep ## Video description If you enjoy hearing about industry changing innovation, I recommend you check out my conversation with Airbnb founder, Brian Chesky, which you can find here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ia6Di_ytiSE 0:00 Intro 3:22 Working Closely with the Greatest Minds of the 21st Century 7:50 Surprising Findings About Elon Musk's Childhood 10:19 Elon Musk Demons & The Traumatic Experience With His Dad 14:43 Raising a Resilient Child 18:17 Elon Associates Pain with Love 20:14 Do You Need Struggle to Be Successful? 21:00 Elon Wasn’t a Good Student 22:48 Could Anyone Become Elon Musk? 25:44 First Principle Thinking 29:43 Confronting Elon: What Happens? 34:46 Elon’s Change of Ideology & His Child Transitioning 38:00 Buying Twitter 43:16 Impact of Being a Disruptive Leader 50:18 Did Steve Jobs & Elon Musk Want to Be Liked? 54:41 Elon’s Mission to Conquer Mars 57:03 Elon’s Fear of Dying Before Accomplishing His Mission 1:00:39 Concerns About Elon’s Mental Health 1:03:21 Key to Hiring Great People 1:06:18 Commonalities Between Steve Jobs & Elon Musk 1:07:55 Importance of Experimentation and Taking Risks 1:10:59 Are They Delusional? 1:13:58 Is Elon Happy? 1:16:24 Do Bezos & Musk Like Each Other? 1:17:37 How Did These Great Minds Change You? 1:23:43 “Elon Is Afraid of Being Alone” 1:26:36 Last Guest Question Are you ready to think like a CEO? Gain access to the 100 CEOs newsletter here: ⁠https://bit.ly/100-ceos-newsletter You can purchase Walter’s new biography, ‘Elon Musk’, here: https://amzn.to/3N6ISa2 Follow Walter: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/walter_isaacson/ Join the waitlist for The Conversation Cards: http://theconversationcards.com/ Listen on: Apple podcast - https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/the-diary-of-a-ceo-by-steven-bartlett/id1291423644 Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/7iQXmUT7XGuZSzAMjoNWlX Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGq-a57w-aPwyi3pW7XLiHw/join FOLLOW ► Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/steven/ Twitter: https://x.com/StevenBartlett?s=20 Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/steven-bartlett-56986834/ Sponsors: Eight Sleep: https://www.eightsleep.com/uk/steven/ CODE: STEVEN (save $150 on the Pod Cover) Uber One: https://www.uber.com/gb/en/u/uber-one/ Huel: https://g2ul0.app.link/G4RjcdKNKsb Licenses: https://elements.envato.com/trailer-neoclassic-NKW8B6P NKW8B6P Z7V4XGAD8W [Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDmC5u_MLE)

Source quotes

[10:46] 沃尔特·艾萨克森: 甚至最伟大的人物,也是由瑕疵塑造而成的。 [12:56] 贝拉克·奥巴马: 每一个成功的男人,要么是在竭力达到父亲的期望,要么是在竭力洗刷父亲犯下的罪过。 [14:43] 梅耶·马斯克: 这就是一代冒险家在训练下一代冒险家。 [17:16] 金博尔·马斯克: 他把痛苦和爱联系在了一起。 [28:41] 史蒂夫·乔布斯: 因为只有那些疯狂到以为自己能够改变世界的人,才真正改变了世界。 [29:43] 埃隆·马斯克: 如果你承担的风险没有导致 20% 的问题发生,那就说明你承担的风险还远远不够。 [41:25] 埃隆·马斯克: 去他的心理安全感,极致的紧迫感才是我们的行动纲领,心理安全感就是我们的敌人。 [45:56] 史蒂夫·乔布斯: 你总戴着天鹅绒手套,一门心思想让身边的人感到舒服。但我必须让他们感到不适,必须让他们直面极限挑战。我没有容忍平庸之辈和溺爱他们的奢侈。 [50:18] 埃隆·马斯克: 同僚之情是你们的敌人!你们绝不能指望他们喜欢你们!你们的职责是去挑战他们、卡死指标。如果他们太喜欢你们,说明你们根本没有尽职! [52:43] 史蒂夫·乔布斯: 你是想卖一辈子糖水,还是想跟我一起改变世界? [60:49] 埃隆·马斯克: 我最后悔的是,自己总会时不时地开枪打自己的脚,或者拿刀捅自己的大腿。 [63:21] 史蒂夫·乔布斯: 制造那些产品固然很艰难,但真正重要的是打造一支能够持续制造伟大产品的团队。因此,我做过最了不起的事,就是打造了苹果的团队。 [70:59] 埃隆·马斯克: 是的,但我擅长将‘绝无可能’变成‘仅仅是严重延期’。 [74:03] 史蒂夫·乔布斯: 如果我们不自我吞噬,别人就会把我们当午餐吃掉。 [86:36] 沃尔特·艾萨克森: 知晓你的使命,并且认清你自己。

Source quotes

[0:00] Walter Isaacson: All the people I've written about who are disruptors, they tend to have had demons driving them. But for Elon Musk, it was particularly brutal. [3:22] Walter Isaacson: Musk spends about 80% of his hardcore mental energy designing the machines that make the machines. [7:50] Walter Isaacson: Even the best are molded out of faults. [14:43] Walter Isaacson: Kimbal, his brother, says he associates pain with love. And Elon Musk says to me, 'Adversity shaped me. It made me who I am.' [21:00] Walter Isaacson: He had an intense focus. So when he focused on something... he would be awesomely smart. Problem is he doesn't like things that don't interest him. [25:44] Walter Isaacson: There are no rules, there's no regulations, there's no protocols except for the laws of physics. Everything else is just a recommendation. [25:44] Walter Isaacson: The people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world are the ones who do. [29:43] Elon Musk: Do you have got a pocket knife? [29:43] Walter Isaacson: I'd rather be burned out than bored. [43:16] Elon Musk: Psychological safety... screw that. An urgent intensity is our operating principle. Psychological safety is our enemy. [60:49] Elon Musk: I regret the fact that every now and then I start shooting myself in the foot or stabbing myself in the thigh. [66:18] Elon Musk: I'm a specialist at turning the impossible into the merely very late.

Original transcript

[0:00] You're the only person on earth that [0:01] followed Steve Jobs and Elon Musk for [0:04] years and years. So, [0:06] what did you learn? [0:08] This is going to be a fun ride. [0:10] Walter Isaacson. [0:11] One of the greatest biography writers [0:13] ever. [0:13] Whose work allows all of us to learn [0:15] from some of the greatest minds in [0:16] history. [0:17] And all the people I've written about [0:19] who are disruptors, they tend to have [0:21] had demons driving them. But for Elon [0:24] Musk, it was particularly brutal. They [0:26] scrawny kid on the autism spectrum, no [0:30] friends, beaten up quite often. But the [0:32] scars from that were minor compared to [0:34] what happened when he went home. It took [0:36] traveling around with Elon for 2 years, [0:39] morning, noon, and night before I could [0:40] get him to open up about his father. And [0:43] then it started coming out. Everything [0:45] from his hardwiring to his [0:47] psychologically abusive father helped [0:49] make somebody who's addicted to drama. [0:52] He was at Twitter headquarters. He [0:54] decides they should get rid of one of [0:56] the server farms. And the engineers say, [0:58] "We can't do it." He fires them. And [1:00] then Christmas Eve, Elon forces his way [1:02] into the server facility with a set of [1:05] wire cutters and cuts the cable to the [1:08] server. It drove the teams crazy, but it [1:10] drove them to do things they didn't [1:12] think they could do it because Musk [1:13] spends 80% of his hardcore mental energy [1:17] on [1:18] But is he happy? [1:22] How did Steve Jobs change you? [1:24] When he was dying, I was in his backyard [1:27] with him and he says, "I regret [1:30] Imagine that you could follow Steve Jobs [1:34] and Elon Musk for years and years and [1:37] years and years. [1:39] Imagine what you would learn. [1:42] Imagine what you would see. [1:44] Imagine the value that you would take [1:47] from that experience of following two of [1:49] the greatest world-shifting [1:50] entrepreneurs that have ever lived. [1:53] Well, the man that sits in front of me [1:55] today was given that privilege. He got [1:58] to follow Steve Jobs until the day that [2:01] he died and he got to follow Elon Musk [2:03] for years and years and years in order [2:08] to write down what he saw and share that [2:11] information with you. If you've ever [2:13] wondered what it takes to be a genius, [2:16] what it takes to change the world, what [2:18] the cost is, the sacrifice, how to make [2:22] decisions, how to think, and how and [2:25] what motivates these world-changing [2:28] entrepreneurs. [2:30] In the next hour and a half, [2:32] you find out. [2:34] And before this episode starts, I want [2:36] to make a deal with you. About 58% of [2:39] you that watch this podcast frequently [2:40] haven't yet hit the subscribe button. If [2:42] you enjoy what we do here, here's the [2:43] deal that I want to make with you. If [2:45] you hit that subscribe button, I promise [2:48] you that we will keep making this show [2:51] better in every single way and we have [2:53] huge plans to turn this into more of a [2:55] documentary-style [2:57] conversation where we work incredibly [2:58] hard to bring in footage of the things [3:01] we're talking about to give you greater [3:03] context and greater meaning. So, if you [3:05] hit the subscribe button, I promise you [3:07] that we will deliver an even greater [3:10] version of this show. [3:12] I hope you choose to come along on this [3:13] journey. Enjoy this episode. [3:22] Walter, you have a tremendous amount of [3:24] insight from following and studying some [3:27] of the world's greatest minds, but also [3:29] from a tremendously successful career of [3:31] your own as a CEO and as a business [3:33] person. For anybody that doesn't know, [3:36] who are the individuals that you've been [3:38] able to follow and study and had unique [3:41] exclusive access to? [3:43] It was mainly Steve Jobs who brought us [3:45] into the digital revolution with [3:47] everything from friendly computers to a [3:49] thousand songs in our pocket and I spent [3:52] about two years at his side doing a [3:54] biography of him and then Jennifer [3:57] Doudna who I think brought us into the [3:59] life sciences revolution because she and [4:01] her colleagues helped invent CRISPR this [4:04] tool that can edit our own DNA which is [4:07] like whoa that's transformative and so I [4:10] spent a lot of time at her Berkeley lab [4:12] and learning how to edit human genes and [4:15] then after that the next logical choice [4:17] seemed to be Elon Musk bringing us into [4:20] the era of space travel electric [4:22] vehicles artificial intelligence and [4:25] surprisingly when I talked to him [4:28] he had read a couple of my books he said [4:30] I said I just want to do this not based [4:33] on five or 10 interviews but based on [4:36] staying by your side for two years [4:38] watching you morning noon and night [4:40] whenever I want he went okay and then I [4:43] said but by the way I'm not going to [4:45] show you the book in advance you get no [4:47] control over it he went okay and I [4:50] thought all right this is going to be a [4:51] fun ride [4:52] Were you surprised? [4:54] I I was a little bit surprised but if [4:56] you know Musk he has sort of a little [4:59] superhero complex and he thinks of [5:01] himself playing big roles on the world [5:03] stage and he loves to be transparent [5:06] and I kind of suspected he would want to [5:08] have this [5:10] there was a mutual friend who helped [5:12] broker the deal and the friend said you [5:14] know he he wants a biography I think he [5:17] sees himself in the same trajectory as a [5:20] Steve Jobs or a Jennifer Doudna [5:22] And why did you want to do it? [5:24] I wanted to do somebody who's taking us [5:26] back into the era of space travel [5:28] because I'm old enough to be one of [5:30] those geeks who remember the countdown [5:33] of 10 9 8 and you hold your breath and [5:35] they'd launch from Cape Canaveral also I [5:39] believe very much sustainable energy is [5:42] important to the planet which means not [5:44] just electric vehicles but solar roofs [5:46] and power walls and the things he's [5:48] doing. I also tend to think that he's a [5:51] great engineer. He understands [5:54] uh physical engineering. He doesn't [5:56] understand human emotions very well, [5:58] which is why he was better off with [6:00] Tesla and SpaceX and not uh buying [6:03] Twitter. [6:04] Uh but I wanted to understand the uh [6:07] pioneering work that was being done. [6:09] He's the only person who can get [6:11] astronauts from the US into orbit, you [6:14] know, NASA can no longer do it. Boeing [6:16] can't do it. So, how come? How did he [6:18] make those rockets work? [6:21] And with Steve Jobs, what was the um [6:22] access that you were given to him? [6:24] Oh, I stayed almost I stayed in his [6:27] guesthouse, right, [6:29] uh in his backyard for off and on for a [6:33] couple of years. It wasn't quite the [6:35] access I got to Elon Musk. With Steve [6:38] Jobs, it might be 1 week every couple of [6:41] months I'd spend uh with him. With Musk, [6:44] it was [6:46] three or four weeks per month sometimes. [6:49] Steve Jobs was [6:51] interesting, but he was mainly [6:54] interested in the beautiful design and [6:56] conceptualizing of products. And so, [6:59] we'd spend a lot of time in Jony Ive's [7:01] uh wonderful design studio at Apple [7:04] headquarters, where Steve would spend [7:06] the afternoon [7:08] hour after hour walking around even [7:10] looking at things like [7:12] the European plug for a uh a charger and [7:16] how it was going to be different from [7:17] the American plug, but how curved, you [7:19] know, he just cared about God being in [7:22] the details of each design. [7:24] Musk cares a lot more about executing [7:28] the design through manufacturing and [7:31] assembly line. Musk spends about 80% of [7:35] his hardcore mental energy designing the [7:38] machines that make the machines. In [7:40] other words, the Raptor engines or the [7:42] battery cells, or the Teslas. And so, a [7:45] lot of the time I spent with him was [7:48] on assembly lines. [7:50] When I sit here with CEOs or successful [7:52] people, um I always start with their [7:55] childhood because I think it provides an [7:56] important context as to the people that [7:59] they are. It's almost like their [8:00] childhood [8:00] a biographer. You know it begins in [8:02] childhood. [8:04] Well, I mean, you're the the king of [8:05] biography, so I had no idea that that's [8:07] where it's meant to start. It just seems [8:09] like the most obvious place because it's [8:11] the foundation of people, and those [8:12] fingerprints seem to remain on them as [8:14] adults. When you look at Elon's [8:17] childhood, do you spot things that are [8:20] the reason he is the man he is today? [8:22] Absolutely. But, let me step back and [8:24] talk about almost all the people I've [8:26] written about who are disruptors. [8:30] They tend to have had uh [8:32] childhoods in which they were misfits. [8:34] Uh starting with Leonardo da Vinci, who [8:36] I wrote about. He grew up in a small [8:39] village. Uh he was left-handed, [8:42] illegitimate. His father didn't [8:43] legitimate him. He was gay. He was [8:46] distracted. And so, he has demons [8:49] driving him as he runs away from the [8:50] village of Vinci to go to Florence. Uh [8:54] and you can go all the way through. [8:55] Albert Einstein, growing up Jewish in [8:57] Germany. Steve Jobs, having been adopted [9:00] and adoptive family didn't take to him, [9:02] and he moves on to another one. [9:06] For Elon Musk, it was particularly [9:08] brutal. He grew up in South Africa as a [9:11] scrawny kid on the autism spectrum. So, [9:14] he had no social input-output skills. He [9:18] was uh no friends. [9:20] And he was beaten up quite often. But, [9:22] the scars from that were minor compared [9:26] to uh what happened when he went home. [9:28] After being beaten up once, he was in [9:30] the hospital for 4 days. [9:32] But, he gets home, and his father makes [9:34] him stand in front of him [9:36] uh for 2 hours while the father tells [9:38] him he's a loser and that it was his [9:40] fault and takes the side of the kid who [9:42] beat up Elon. And so, it's one of the [9:45] oldest tropes in mythology, which is the [9:49] aspiring young superhero fighting the [9:52] dark side of the force and finding out [9:54] Darth Vader is his father, having to [9:57] overcome those demons. I think most of [9:59] us, I mean, you have a very interesting [10:01] background yourself from Botswana to [10:03] Manchester to here in London. I think [10:06] most of us have things that drive us and [10:08] sometimes there's some demons from [10:09] childhood. But the question is whether [10:12] you harness those demons or those demons [10:14] harness you. And in Elon Musk's case, [10:17] the answer is both. [10:19] Do you find that that's nearly always [10:20] the case? That that those demons create [10:22] both your [10:24] As Tim Grover said to me, Tim Grover was [10:26] the coach for Michael Jordan, Kobe, and [10:28] he speaks to everybody having a dark [10:30] side and a light side and they have a [10:32] two-way relationship with each other. [10:33] They typically come from the same place. [10:35] So, he'd speak to Michael Jordan's [10:37] greatness coming from the same place [10:38] that his [10:40] dark side came from. [10:42] And you've just described the entire [10:43] theme of the Elon Musk book, which is [10:46] darkness and lightness woven together, [10:49] each coming from the same place, [10:51] sometimes driving people crazy, [10:54] sometimes driving them to do things they [10:55] didn't think they'd be able to do. [10:58] And you want to take out the dark [11:00] strands of Elon Musk, see, demon mode as [11:03] his girlfriend Grimes calls it, where he [11:06] just [11:07] truly gets cold and in a very bad place. [11:12] But if you take out those strands, maybe [11:14] you don't have Elon Musk at the end [11:16] because the dark and the light all come [11:19] from the same roots. [11:23] Shakespeare, as usual, said it best. [11:26] Even the best are molded out of faults. [11:29] And indeed, that's what you're talking [11:32] about, whether it's Michael Jordan or [11:34] Kobe or Elon Musk. [11:37] What does Elon think of his father? [11:40] Did you speak to him directly about him? [11:42] Yes. Uh he doesn't speak to his father [11:45] anymore, of course. And uh it's very [11:47] brutal relationship. [11:49] Yeah, but I spoke to his father and [11:52] yeah, for quite a long time. [11:55] And still he's in contact with me. [11:58] It took a year of traveling around with [12:01] Elon Musk before I could get him to open [12:03] up about his father. And that's why a [12:06] biography done the way Boswell did with [12:09] Dr. Johnson and in a much smaller way I [12:12] tried to do with Elon Musk or Steve Jobs [12:15] is important because you're not just [12:17] doing a few interviews. You're just with [12:19] them day in day out. And after a year, [12:22] every now and then they'd say, "Tell me [12:23] about your childhood. Tell me about your [12:25] dad." And he'd just stare blankly and be [12:29] not wanting to speak. [12:30] And then one day, we're actually on his [12:32] plane flying to California from Texas. [12:36] And once again, I just it was very [12:39] quiet. Finally I said, "Tell me about [12:41] your dad." It was about the 20th time [12:42] I'd asked him. [12:44] He must have been silent for 2 minutes, [12:46] 3 minutes. I didn't say a word. And then [12:49] it started coming out, the stories of [12:51] childhood. [12:53] And so [12:54] yeah, he's still rattled by the memory [12:56] of his father [12:58] has had two children by [13:03] uh young woman that he had raised as a [13:05] stepdaughter. [13:07] And so that really messed up Elon's [13:09] mind. [13:11] Elon's father raised a stepdaughter and [13:13] then had two kids with [13:15] The stepdaughter, yes. And so [13:18] there's [13:19] uh and he's talked about it. Errol Musk [13:23] also is an astonishingly good engineer [13:27] who gave many uh good things in [13:29] childhood. He was at times successful, [13:32] at times less so. [13:33] Errol is his father? [13:34] Errol is the father. [13:36] But he also instilled some of these [13:38] demons. So it's the most complex [13:42] relationship. Now Barack Obama begins [13:45] one of his memoirs by saying, "I think [13:47] every successful man is either trying to [13:49] live up to the expectations of his [13:51] father or live down the sins of his [13:53] father." And [13:55] Obama says, "In my case it's both." [13:58] Well, in Elon's case it's both. [14:01] And what did you learn if anything from [14:02] speaking to Elon's father? [14:04] I learned that he was [14:08] like a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde in the [14:11] Stevenson thing and [14:13] novel. [14:14] In other words, [14:15] he could be a brilliant doctor, but then [14:17] he'd snap into these demon-like modes [14:21] and Mr. Hyde and hardly remember when he [14:24] would snap back out and became Dr. [14:26] Jekyll, hardly remember what happened. [14:29] And that multiple personality was very [14:33] much what Errol Musk himself says, "Yes, [14:37] I go through these things." Well, guess [14:40] what? You see that in Elon Musk. [14:43] Based on what you saw in some of the [14:45] resilient leaders that you've followed, [14:47] if your job was to create a really [14:49] resilient child, [14:51] what would you do to the child? [14:53] You know, that's such an interesting [14:54] question and those of us who have [14:56] children in this day and age, [14:58] I think we can't help but coddling them [15:01] too much. [15:02] I watched the way Elon was raised in [15:06] South Africa where they, you know, his [15:09] father gave him a motorcycle when he was [15:12] 11 or 12 years old and driving, you [15:14] know, going around. He would [15:17] almost free range be that way. Elon [15:21] would, he could walk or go everywhere he [15:24] wanted, get beaten up. Uh [15:26] And his parents weren't hovering. [15:29] Well, likewise, I watch Elon, who has 10 [15:32] surviving children, [15:34] and Elon is deeply committed to those [15:36] children. He's almost obsessed by them. [15:39] And yet, especially with little X, I [15:41] don't know if you've seen the 3-year-old [15:43] kid who is always in the pictures with [15:44] Elon. Like you'll see a picture of Elon [15:47] at the F1. [15:48] He's always holding his [15:50] I I'd be there at night. They'd be doing [15:53] a solar roof installation at midnight. [15:56] And Musk would be in, you know, [15:58] hyperdrive, [16:00] getting all the equipment and telling [16:02] people what to do, cuz Musk loved to be [16:04] hands-on. And I'd watch little X playing [16:07] amid the cables and heavy equipment. And [16:11] my instincts are like, go grab this kid [16:13] and make sure he's safe. [16:15] But, [16:17] I think that Musk, I remember when they [16:19] shot off Starship, this largest rocket [16:22] ever, for the first test, which went [16:25] well for about 3 minutes. And [16:27] afterwards, [16:28] we're sitting in down in South Texas at [16:31] the launch pad behind it, and having [16:34] drinks in their fire pit. And Elon is [16:37] there with his mother, May, his [16:39] girlfriend, Grimes, and little X. And X [16:42] is playing in a fire pit, just putting [16:45] things in and putting [16:46] And my instincts are, go grab the kid. [16:49] And Musk says to me, "When I was a kid, [16:52] they used to say, 'Don't play with [16:53] matches.' So, I got a box of matches, [16:56] and I played with them behind a tree." [16:58] And it was his wife saying, "I'm going [16:59] to let X continue to do that." And May [17:02] Musk said, "I think it's one generation [17:04] of risk-takers training the next." So, [17:08] maybe we should allow our kids to be a [17:10] little bit more risk-taking as opposed [17:13] to hovering the way my wife and I do. [17:16] And I I was reading in your book about [17:17] how when Elon's parents got a divorce [17:20] when he was young, that meant that [17:21] Elon's mother, who was taking care of [17:23] him, had to then go and get a job, which [17:25] left Elon at home alone. [17:26] Right, right. That's what I'm saying. He [17:27] was pretty much home alone cuz his [17:29] mother had three jobs at times. [17:32] And she's a great person. [17:34] But she wasn't somebody who doted and [17:36] worried every moment of the day. And so [17:40] she was often not around and divorced [17:43] from his father. At one point he lost [17:45] as a very young teenager decides to move [17:47] back in with his father. Which is [17:50] psychologically [17:52] uh even now Maye Musk says I [17:55] why did he do that? And [17:58] Kimbal, his brother, says he associates [18:01] pain with love. [18:02] And [18:05] Elon Musk says to me, [18:07] adversity [18:09] shaped me. It made me who I am. [18:11] So there's a part of Elon Musk that [18:13] loves drama and [18:15] rushing into the fire. [18:17] He associates pain with love. From your [18:19] observations, do you believe that [18:21] regardless of whether it's healthy or [18:23] not, we tend to seek out the [18:26] environment of our childhood when we're [18:29] older because familiarity is almost [18:33] sometimes seems to be more important to [18:34] us than [18:36] whether it's healthy. [18:37] You know, that's a brilliant [18:38] observation, which is [18:41] cuz certainly with Elon Musk [18:43] he's almost always trying to recreate [18:45] the drama, the turmoil of his childhood [18:47] in apartheid South Africa, seeing people [18:50] killed and [18:52] uh having an abusive, psychologically [18:54] abusive father. [18:56] And I think we're all different. I'm [18:59] personally somebody who had a pretty [19:01] nice childhood. My parents are the [19:03] sweetest, nicest, smartest people I've [19:05] ever known. [19:06] And I grew up in New Orleans and still [19:09] go back there, still live with about [19:10] eight blocks from where I was born and [19:13] see the kids I went to kindergarten with [19:15] and I love going back to that magical, [19:18] we call it the green trees of our [19:20] childhood. [19:21] Uh but it's also why I'm not driven [19:25] I'm not as [19:27] a disruptor the way Jobs and Musk are. [19:30] I'm a little bit more suited to being [19:32] amused and watching disruptors. So, [19:36] my role is a little bit more as an [19:38] observer. You've been both. You've been [19:41] an observer on this podcast or on TV, [19:44] but you're also a person in the arena by [19:46] starting companies. I was in the arena [19:49] quite a while. I ran CNN during the Gulf [19:52] War and it was a pretty intense thing to [19:55] do. [19:56] But in some ways I'm not as suited to [20:00] running into fire and turmoil as Elon [20:03] Musk is and when the time came and the [20:05] Gulf War was over, I decided I'd rather [20:08] write books and [20:10] uh [20:11] have a [20:12] go back to New Orleans. [20:14] So, do you you did touch on this [20:16] earlier, but I just it just came back to [20:17] mind again. Do you think that these [20:19] individuals who are most able to deal [20:21] with running into the fire are those [20:23] that were raised in the fire? [20:25] It's not a one-to-one correlation [20:29] as people sometimes when they're [20:31] arguing with me, they'll say, "Oh look, [20:33] there are people with really bad [20:34] childhoods who become totally [20:36] ne'er-do-wells and you know, never [20:38] amount to anything." And there are [20:39] people with really wonderful childhoods [20:42] who are very, very driven. [20:44] I think though it's a it may not be a [20:46] one-to-one correlation, but it's [20:48] certainly a non-zero correlation that [20:52] having something to prove coming out of [20:54] childhood and having demons to harness [20:57] tends to drive you a bit more. [21:01] One of the things that surprised me in [21:02] your book was that you said [21:04] Elon was a good student, but not [21:06] fantastic. [21:07] Yeah, even in South Africa and at boy's [21:10] school [21:11] and then when he goes to college his [21:13] SATs are fine, but you know, they're not [21:16] all 800s which is the scale we use in [21:19] the US [21:20] uh [21:21] for [21:21] uh college admissions test. [21:23] But he had an intense focus. So when he [21:27] focused on something [21:29] you know, he would be awesomely smart. [21:32] Problem is he doesn't like things that [21:34] don't interest him. So when he had to [21:36] learn Afrikaans in school and you know, [21:39] he flunks it or when he has to learn [21:41] certain things [21:42] uh [21:43] but when it came to engineering, [21:45] especially material science, he could [21:48] focus like a laser on and I mean that [21:53] figuratively, but on the properties of [21:56] materials that are engineering problems. [22:00] And I I heard that when he discovered [22:03] the computer that was another example of [22:05] that. [22:06] That insane focus. He taught himself to [22:07] code in a couple of days. [22:08] Sure. I mean he [22:10] he grew up at that time that I can [22:12] remember and you can't [22:14] where computer suddenly pop up. You can [22:17] have your own computer. And that's one [22:19] of the things Steve Jobs and Bill Gates [22:22] and [22:23] uh brought us to which is oh, a computer [22:25] you can actually plug in and have at [22:26] home and code on. [22:28] Well, he got one and taught himself C++ [22:31] and I think uh [22:33] maybe uh Python uh Pascal [22:36] and [22:37] at age 12 or 13 coded his own video game [22:40] called Blastar which he published. And [22:42] he becomes addicted to two things. One [22:45] is computers and two is video games. [22:48] Did did did um you you spoke to his [22:50] mother quite a lot. [22:51] Yeah, I still do. She's uh very much [22:54] around. [22:55] What did she think of him at that age [22:56] when he's 11, 12? Did they did she think [22:58] he was a genius? [22:58] Yes. She uh for better or worse [23:02] uh [23:03] was not a doting mother, was not [23:04] somebody hovering all the time, but was [23:06] a when Elon was five or six years old, [23:09] she decided he was a genius and used to [23:12] fight with the schools when the schools [23:15] would sometimes say, "He's not doing [23:18] well in school and he'd be distracted. [23:20] He's always looking out of the window [23:22] and staring blankly." And she would say, [23:24] "Because he's a genius and you're not [23:26] challenging him enough." And I think she [23:28] still feels he's a genius. [23:30] Do you think if someone wanted to be [23:32] like Elon Musk, they could choose to be? [23:35] No. Um [23:37] there's certain [23:39] types of curiosity and drive that we can [23:44] will ourselves to being. I've written [23:46] about Benjamin Franklin, for example. [23:48] Benjamin Franklin was very wise, but [23:51] he's probably not the smartest of the [23:52] founders and I don't mean that in a [23:54] disparaging way, but you have Hamilton [23:56] and Jefferson and people who are really [23:58] brilliant. What you have in Franklin is [24:00] somebody who's purely curious, always [24:03] open to new ideas and unbelievably [24:06] observant. Well, we can all push [24:08] ourselves to be that way more. But can [24:11] we push ourselves to be Einstein? And [24:14] no, we can't. And for Musk, he has a [24:17] certain intensity [24:20] that I think that even if you drank 50 [24:22] cups of coffee and you know, you put an [24:25] electric volt [24:28] prod in the back of your head, [24:31] that focus and maniacal intensity and [24:34] sense of urgency is something that's not [24:37] instilled in most of us. [24:40] Do you think it's a trauma response of [24:42] sorts? [24:43] It's a trauma response. It's also and [24:46] the book is [24:48] got a lot, you know, of pa- you know, [24:49] it's [24:50] you can't have a one-sentence, here's [24:53] why, but you start in childhood with the [24:55] trauma. [24:57] You also start with a guy who's on the [24:59] autism spectrum. Talks about having [25:01] Asperger's as he calls it. [25:04] And that means he doesn't have good [25:05] input-output signals for emotional You [25:08] don't have good emotional human [25:10] receptors. [25:12] But he does have [25:14] this [25:16] intense [25:17] focus, almost in a geek-like way, [25:21] on certain engineering or mathematical [25:24] or coding issues. I think everything [25:27] from his hard wiring to his childhood [25:30] and upbringing [25:32] help make somebody who's addicted to [25:35] turmoil, [25:36] who has a maniacal intensity of focus, [25:40] and also has multiple personality mood [25:43] swings. [25:44] He ends up leaving South Africa and [25:46] studies uh physics and business at the [25:47] same time. And I was I thought it was so [25:49] fascinating that the reason why he took [25:51] up business, which is quite rare for [25:53] someone to do physics and business, I [25:54] think. [25:55] He said he didn't want to [25:57] end up working for somebody who studied [25:59] business [26:00] uh and didn't understand the science. [26:02] And he felt that if he didn't understand [26:05] the business side, he'd end up having to [26:07] work for somebody else. [26:09] It's almost the first evidence of like, [26:11] well, not the first evidence, but it's [26:13] again evidence of his first principle [26:14] thinking. In play? [26:16] Yes. You know, first principle thinking [26:18] is key to who he is. [26:19] someone that doesn't know? [26:20] And first principles thinking is [26:23] whenever you're faced with a problem, [26:26] you just go back to the very basic [26:28] physics of it. Not all the rules and [26:31] regulations and not all the metaphors [26:34] you may have saying here's the way to do [26:36] things. [26:37] But you you first off say there no [26:40] rules, [26:41] there's no regulations, [26:43] there's no protocols except for the laws [26:45] of physics. Everything else is just a [26:47] recommendation. And to give you a [26:49] concrete example, when he decides that [26:51] he wants to send people into space as a [26:55] young guy, at first he goes to Russia to [26:58] see if he can buy used rockets. [27:01] And they jack him around. It doesn't [27:04] work. And on the plane flight home, he [27:06] says, "Let me go to first principles [27:08] thinking. Exactly how much is the cost [27:11] of each material in a rocket? How much [27:14] is the uh Inconel? How much is the [27:16] carbon fiber? How much is the fuel?" [27:19] And then [27:21] "How much is the total cost of a rocket [27:23] compared to the cost of each of the [27:24] components?" And that's first principles [27:27] thinking, which is I get it. If I can I [27:30] know the material cost, but if I can [27:33] reduce by a factor of 10 the [27:35] manufacturing cost, then I can make a [27:38] rocket. And so somebody will tell him, [27:40] "Hey, we need to have this patch or this [27:43] piece of felt in the bottom of a Tesla." [27:45] And he'd say, "Tell me what the physics [27:47] of of the principles of physics that [27:49] make that true are." [27:51] When he's pursuing first principles, [27:53] what is he trying to get around and past [27:57] that frustrates him? [27:59] Regulations, rules, people who won't [28:01] take risks. [28:03] He says that, you know, the US was a [28:06] nation of risk takers. Whether you came [28:08] on the Mayflower, you came across the [28:10] Rio Grande, or you came from Eastern [28:12] Europe fleeing oppression. [28:14] Your family took risks. But now we've [28:16] got more regulators than we have risk [28:18] takers. We have more regu- forees and [28:20] people building guardrails and lawyers [28:22] telling you that's probably not a good [28:24] idea than we have people willing to [28:26] shoot up a rocket. [28:28] And [28:29] I think by going back to first [28:31] principles, [28:33] he wants to be able to [28:36] not only calculate risk, but take risk [28:39] more than most people would. [28:41] Was Steve Jobs the same in that regard? [28:44] Steve Jobs was not focused on hardware [28:47] engineering in the same way Wozniak was, [28:50] his partner. [28:51] Uh but yes, Jobs [28:55] had a particular phrase, very famous [28:58] now, which was think different. And when [29:00] Steve Jobs went back to Apple after his [29:04] So I sort of like Sam Altman, you know, [29:06] come and go, come and go. It took Steve [29:09] Jobs a decade, not a weekend, to do it. [29:12] Um he wrote an ad uh [29:15] for Apple. [29:16] And it had pictures of Einstein and [29:19] other disruptive intellectuals. And it [29:22] said, "Here's to the Here's to the crazy [29:25] ones, the misfits, the rebels, the round [29:27] pegs in the square hole, the ones who [29:29] think different." And then it ends by [29:31] saying, "Because the people who are [29:33] crazy enough to think they can change [29:35] the world [29:36] are the ones who do." [29:38] And that was Steve Jobs's way of [29:40] thinking, and it also describes Elon [29:42] Musk. [29:43] Have you seen moments yourself when you [29:45] were following him where he was [29:46] confronted by someone who had a default [29:49] to telling him why things couldn't [29:51] happen and why they couldn't be done? [29:52] Oh, absolutely. I mean, there's like 20, [29:54] 30 times in the book. It's just And he [29:56] goes, "Well, I said I'll tell you a fun [29:58] one, [29:59] which is just last Christmas, you know, [30:00] not too long ago. [30:02] He was at Twitter headquarters, [30:05] and he looks at all the engineering [30:08] things, and they have three server farms [30:11] uh for for uh one in Portland, one in [30:13] Sacramento, and one I think in Atlanta. [30:16] And he does the calculus in his head, [30:18] and he said, "We don't really need three [30:19] different redundant server farms." And [30:22] the engineers say, "Well, yes, we do, [30:24] because we need backups, and we need [30:25] caching, or whatever." And he says, "No, [30:27] you're not going back to first [30:29] principles thinking. If you look at [30:31] this, [30:32] anyway, he decides they should get rid [30:34] of the servers in Sacramento. Well, they [30:36] say, "Fine, but that'll take 6 months, [30:38] because [30:40] and he said, "No, you can do it in 6 [30:42] weeks." And the engineers and I'm [30:44] sitting there in the meeting and he's [30:46] getting really dark and they don't know [30:47] how to deal with him cuz this is like a [30:49] month after he took over Twitter. So, [30:51] they don't know this dude. They're [30:52] saying, "Well, no, I'm sorry, Elon, we [30:54] can't do it in that." And he said, "You [30:56] can do it in 6 weeks." And by the end of [30:58] the meeting said, "You can do it in 6 [30:59] days." He gets really dark. [31:02] And he decides he's going to fire them, [31:04] but it's December 23rd. [31:07] So, it's like 2 days before Christmas. [31:10] He does fire them, but the next day, [31:12] Christmas Eve, he's flying from San [31:14] Francisco to Austin, Texas to go home [31:16] for Christmas. He's with two young [31:18] cousins on the plane who are engineers. [31:20] And one of them says, "Why don't we just [31:23] take those servers out ourselves?" Elon [31:25] Musk makes a U-turn in his airplane, [31:27] tells the pilot to go to Sacramento. [31:30] They were already over Nevada. They [31:32] land. He rents They're like four of them [31:36] on the plane. They rent a truck, a sort [31:38] of what we call a U-Haul truck, a rental [31:41] truck. And they go to the server [31:43] facility and they [31:45] the guard there is like flummoxed. It's [31:47] Christmas Eve and they're forcing their [31:49] way in. And they're looking at the [31:51] servers and one of the engineers says, [31:54] "Well, you know, we can't take them out [31:56] cuz we need engineers to take off these [31:59] elevated floors, you know, those floor [32:01] tiles where people sit." [32:02] And Musk turns to his bodyguard and [32:06] says, "Do you have got a pocket knife?" [32:08] The guy goes, "Yeah." And he takes a [32:09] pocket knife and pulls up one of the [32:11] vents, rips up the floor thing, goes [32:13] underneath the floor panel with a set of [32:16] wire cutters that he got from Home Depot [32:19] and cuts the cable to the servers. And [32:21] they start moving them out and put them [32:23] in the U-Haul truck. And this is Musk [32:25] just And by the way, it's typical of [32:27] Musk cuz it works fine for a few days. [32:30] Then you can see the servers getting a [32:32] bit degraded, but then eventually it [32:34] comes back. And he says, "You got to [32:36] take rest, if if you're not sort of [32:39] causing 20% of the problems in the rest [32:41] you take, you're not taking enough [32:42] rest." [32:43] But there it is, and they got rid of [32:45] that server farm in Sacramento. [32:48] What happens to the people that Musk [32:50] works with when they see that case study [32:53] that in that moment he when he presented [32:56] that he they could do it in 6 weeks and [32:58] it turns out he was right that it could [32:59] be done quicker. Is that what sort of [33:01] galvanizes the team? [33:02] Totally. And about 20 to 30% of the [33:06] people who work with him can go march [33:09] through fire with him that way and [33:11] realize what he can do. But it's why 80% [33:14] of the people who worked at Twitter when [33:16] he took it over are gone. [33:19] But [33:20] it's tough to work with him. There's [33:22] another scene in the book where [33:24] on a late Friday night he's down in the [33:26] southern tip of Texas where they have [33:28] the launchpad for Starbase. [33:30] And it's a Friday night after 10:00 p.m. [33:34] and he looks at the launchpad area says, [33:36] "Why are there only three or four people [33:38] working?" [33:39] And this poor guy Andy Crab, nice, tall, [33:42] you know, southern young engineer says, [33:44] "Well, it's a Friday night and we don't [33:46] have any launches scheduled." And Musk [33:48] goes dark on him and says, [33:50] "I want tomorrow 100 people working. I [33:54] want them to come from California, [33:56] Florida, get them in here and we're [33:58] going to stack this rocket even though [34:00] we're not planning to launch anytime [34:01] soon, but we're going to have what's [34:02] called a surge." And they fly people in [34:05] and people are sleeping on the ground on [34:06] the floors [34:08] to do this surge. [34:09] And Andy Crab survives it and does [34:13] pretty well, but eventually [34:15] he quits. He says, "Man, I'm having a [34:17] kid. I just can't keep going through [34:19] these things with Elon." And so that's [34:21] in the book. About 3 weeks ago I was in [34:23] Los Angeles and [34:26] talking about the book and I see this [34:28] tall guy I recognize coming up after the [34:30] speech. It's Andy Crab. I said, "What's [34:32] happened?" He said, "Well, as you know, [34:34] I quit and I came back to Los Angeles [34:36] and I got a much easier job, but I [34:38] decided I'd rather be burned out than [34:41] bored, and I've asked Elon if I could [34:43] come back cuz I don't want to miss [34:44] working for SpaceX." [34:46] It's very interesting. The um [34:48] you know, the the acquisition of Twitter [34:50] Twitter was a very from [34:53] you know, you think about where it's [34:53] based and how it was run and all the [34:56] things you've come to learn about the [34:57] company and its sort of political [34:58] leanings. It was very much the [35:00] antithesis of the Musk approach. [35:02] Totally. And he had become [35:04] over the past three or four years, he's [35:07] edged from being what I would call a [35:10] center-left [35:11] uh somebody who donated to Obama and [35:14] voted for Biden [35:17] uh to somebody who has become, I think, [35:20] far too [35:23] worked up about what he calls the woke [35:25] mind virus, you know, the progressive [35:29] uh [35:30] mindset that he sees in colleges and in [35:33] schools. Multiple reasons which I go [35:35] through in the book. [35:37] What's the most important reason? [35:38] Well, the most personal reason [35:41] is he had uh [35:44] uh five older children, teenagers, uh [35:48] surviving. One died in infancy. And the [35:51] oldest of them was named Xavier after [35:53] his favorite [35:55] uh character in the X-Men comics. [35:58] And Xavier transitions the and sends a [36:01] note about 3 years ago saying, [36:03] "I'm transitioning. My name is now [36:05] Jenna, and don't tell my father." [36:08] Now, he gets his head around the fact [36:09] that she transitioned, and he loves her, [36:13] but she becomes very anti-capitalist, [36:16] very woke, hates all billionaires, [36:18] thinks capitalism is theft, and rejects [36:22] him, and changes her last name. And this [36:25] causes him an enormous amount of pain [36:27] and he partly blames it on Los Angeles [36:30] where you live sometimes. There's this [36:32] very progressive school she went to [36:34] called Crossroads. [36:36] And that was one of about seven or eight [36:39] factors that led to this political [36:42] evolution [36:44] where he felt the progressive left was [36:48] overdoing COVID lockdowns, was overdoing [36:52] gender ideology questions. In some ways [36:56] it echoed his father who was also [36:58] somewhat conspiratorial in his thinking [37:01] and didn't believe in vaccines or Dr. [37:04] Fauci or and it's a weird evolution that [37:08] we still see reverberating in the waters [37:11] of Twitter today. [37:12] You say that it caused him a tremendous [37:14] amount of pain that Xavier transitioned [37:17] and is now a woman. [37:19] How do you know that it caused him pain? [37:21] Well, he's said so and he [37:24] he's easy to read even though he doesn't [37:26] read people's emotions well. [37:28] I mean he will say nothing cause has [37:30] caused me more pain. He says this [37:32] outright than uh his daughter rejecting [37:36] him. Not transitioning but just totally [37:38] rejecting him other than the death of [37:41] his first child through [37:43] an infancy. His first child died. [37:46] And he gets very dark and [37:49] you know, you talk to his sister, you [37:50] talk to his brother, his brother's wife. [37:53] They say that's the thing that's caused [37:56] him enormous personal pain and he says [37:59] so. [38:00] Going back to when he acquired Twitter, [38:03] um [38:04] I as a [38:06] great fan of what Elon has achieved and [38:07] the service that he's sort of served to [38:10] humanity with some of these companies [38:12] like Tesla and SpaceX, I [38:14] was really hoping he didn't buy the [38:16] company because I thought it would just [38:17] be a great distraction from [38:18] Bingo. [38:19] really important other things. [38:20] 100%. [38:22] You were you were there, right? At the [38:24] time. [38:24] I was there. So, I'm sitting here just [38:26] opened Giga Texas, which is the largest [38:29] factory manufacturing things. It's a [38:32] Tesla factory in Austin, Texas. We're on [38:35] the mezzanine. The factory's not even [38:37] open yet. [38:39] I guess this is April 2022. [38:41] And he tells me that he still needs more [38:43] drama in his life. He can't accept the [38:45] fact that he's now become the richest [38:47] person on Earth. He's person of the year [38:50] for Financial Times and Time. He's sent [38:53] up 33 rockets that year that landed [38:55] safely and were reused. [38:57] And yet, he says, "Okay, I'm buying [38:59] Twitter." [39:00] And his brother, his son Griffin, his [39:04] uh we're all less his friends, three or [39:06] four friends, is like, [39:08] "Is this a good idea? Aren't you going [39:09] to be distracted?" [39:11] And everybody is sort of trying to talk [39:15] him out of it. I'm not cuz I'm just [39:17] taking notes. I'm just the observer. [39:19] But I'm thinking, "Boy, this is a bad [39:21] idea." Not simply cuz it'll be a [39:23] distraction, but because [39:26] you don't have uh I'm thinking of Musk, [39:29] he doesn't have [39:31] emotional human emotional awareness. [39:35] And so, I asked him, [39:36] "Why are you doing it?" And he said, [39:38] "Well, it's a product problem. They need [39:41] better engineering. They haven't [39:43] put any new features in. They don't have [39:44] emotion video. So, it's an engineering [39:47] challenge." I'm thinking, "No, Twitter's [39:49] not an engineering product. You've been [39:51] through all these before. [39:53] It's an advertising medium. It's [39:55] supposed to gather eyeballs for [39:57] advertisers [39:59] in a friendly environment. And that's [40:01] not [40:02] Elon's specialty. [40:04] So, I think it was [40:06] was then and is now both a distraction [40:10] and does not play to his strengths. [40:12] Did you see it at any point [40:15] and do you believe it will hurt [40:17] the trajectory of Tesla and SpaceX in [40:19] any way? [40:20] That acquisition. [40:21] I think that it probably hurt his [40:25] reputation, especially among more [40:28] progressive people. It obviously has [40:30] hurt, [40:31] which means it probably has hurt Tesla's [40:34] sales. [40:36] As for SpaceX, I don't think it matters [40:39] too much. He [40:40] has been able to be intensely focused, [40:43] including I mean, just today, while [40:45] we're taping this, I think he's [40:48] doing the [40:50] 40th launch this year of the Falcon 9, [40:53] sending up 20 more Starlink satellites. [40:57] He launched Starship and got it all the [41:00] way into space, the all 33 Raptor [41:03] engines working. And he's down there [41:05] intensely focused. So, I think SpaceX is [41:08] okay. I think Tesla will be okay, but [41:11] it'd be better off if he won't [41:14] if A, he won't distracted by Twitter, [41:16] and B, if his reputation hadn't become [41:19] 10 times more controversial, which is [41:22] not great if you're just trying to do a [41:23] mass market car sales. [41:25] When he went into Twitter, one of the [41:28] the very alarming things that he did was [41:31] there was rumors that he called everyone [41:32] up to the top floor and said, "This is [41:34] going to be the new company culture. If [41:35] you don't like it, [41:36] Absolutely. I mean, I was there. I [41:38] walked in with I was I was there that [41:40] the day before he took over. He marches [41:43] in. [41:44] And I think there's a whole chapter in [41:46] the book almost in the [41:48] rapid change in corporate culture that [41:51] happened, something you're very familiar [41:52] with from companies you've dealt with, [41:55] which is a two way two extremes of doing [41:57] a company. One was the way Twitter was, [42:01] which is nurturing and sweet and having [42:04] yoga rooms and artisanal coffee bars. [42:08] And when Musk walks in, they're showing [42:11] him how we have quiet spaces for people [42:14] who need, you know, to get their mental [42:17] energy restored. And they said, "We [42:20] value psychological safety." And Musk [42:23] looked at me and kind of did his raspy [42:27] laugh. He says, "Psychological safety [42:31] blank, they know, screw that." [42:34] "An urgent intensity [42:37] is our operating principle. [42:39] Psychological safety is our enemy." And [42:42] so he turns it into a hardcore all-in [42:45] environment where you have to say, "I'm [42:47] all in. You're going to work 24/7, some [42:49] weekends, cuz you're all in." [42:52] And he said, "I want a team that's 20% [42:54] of the size, but that's [42:57] an order of magnitude more intense and [42:59] more all in." And you've probably seen [43:03] companies with your own eyes who are [43:04] very nurturing, and you've seen [43:06] companies in which everybody's doing a [43:08] hardcore all-in hackathon on a Saturday [43:11] night, [43:12] and he's in the latter camp. [43:16] Do you believe often speak to large [43:18] organizations that have cultural [43:19] problems? They they're not innovative, [43:21] they're being eroded away by [43:24] new market entrants, etc. And the [43:26] problem they have is they can't turn the [43:28] ship around quickly enough [43:31] before the innovation takes them out. [43:33] Big companies that have 50,000 people [43:35] big out [43:36] I I've often want cuz then I saw this [43:38] Elon Musk approach to turn in culture [43:40] around where you basically let off a [43:42] grenade in the building. [43:43] Totally. [43:45] Do you believe there's merit in that? [43:47] That approach? [43:48] Yes, but I also believe there's a big [43:51] old downside and like everything with [43:53] Elon Musk, including the shooting off of [43:55] the rockets, you get amazing things [43:57] happen, but also [43:59] rubble in the wake and damage in the [44:02] wake and personal damage. Uh [44:05] At Tesla, he did that once as a guy, [44:07] John McNeill in the book who was [44:08] president of Tesla, another couple of [44:10] people today. They all say it, which is [44:13] maybe that's the price you have to pay [44:15] if you want to be this disruptive. [44:17] But is it a price that I want to pay? [44:20] The answer is no. And maybe it's too [44:23] high of a price causing so much [44:25] emotional [44:27] turmoil. But there are people, including [44:29] the guy Andy Krebs I told you about who [44:31] wants to go back to work at SpaceX [44:35] who like the challenge, who like the [44:38] emotional turmoil. [44:40] I ran Time magazine. [44:42] It was the good old days. And it was [44:45] about as wonderful of an environment, [44:47] even you would be in the clouds thinking [44:49] about in the 1990s. We were rolling in [44:53] money before the disruption of the [44:55] internet takes away the idea of a [44:57] general interest paper magazine. [45:01] And we had there was a drinks cart that [45:04] would come around every day at 5:00 and [45:06] make cocktails for all the writers. [45:08] There was a roast beef carvery cart in [45:10] the evening. There were [45:13] town cars that would take you out to [45:15] your weekend houses. It was totally [45:18] great. And that environment needed to be [45:20] disrupted, [45:22] but it was a glorious when it happened. [45:25] Then I went to CNN. [45:27] And for a while the Gulf War were you [45:29] know exactly what we're doing. But once [45:31] the Gulf War was over, CNN needed deep [45:35] disruption and I was not very good at [45:38] being a disruptive leader at firing like [45:41] Elon Musk could 80% of the people. [45:44] So sometimes, CNN was one of those big [45:46] old battleships with as you said, lots [45:49] of people working there. [45:52] It probably needed a more disruptive [45:54] leader than I was. [45:56] So interesting. So do you think that [45:57] there's a certain type of cultural [45:59] approach that suits suits a certain type [46:01] of company, Especially as we look at the [46:04] world of AI and robotics and how things [46:05] are going to be accelerating so quickly [46:07] in technology, it seems to be the case [46:09] that companies are going to need to [46:10] disrupt themselves faster than ever if [46:11] you believe some of the forecasts about [46:13] the future that people like Ray Kurzweil [46:15] posit. [46:16] Yeah. And not only you it used to be [46:18] tech companies would have to be [46:19] disruptive. But now if you're an [46:21] insurance company, if you're a law firm, [46:23] you know, if you're a bank, [46:25] the disruption is going to happen. [46:28] Uh if you're a healthcare company, so [46:30] yeah, we're going to have to be [46:31] disruptive. [46:33] That doesn't necessarily mean an all-in [46:36] intense hackathon work all weekend [46:39] culture is necessary. I think it's great [46:42] to have corporate cultures [46:45] in both sides. It's like return to work [46:49] after COVID. I'm not sure there's [46:51] exactly one answer. There's some [46:52] companies that say, "You know what? [46:54] Remote working gets us really good [46:56] people who uh can do better things." [47:00] And there are other people who say, "No, [47:02] I got to have my people back in the [47:03] office." [47:04] I think it's good to experiment or not [47:07] just experiment, but to have [47:08] alternatives. Some people work better in [47:11] some environments, some in others. [47:13] And you could also ask the question not [47:15] just about corporate environments, but [47:16] about corporate leaders, which is what [47:18] you discussed most of the time. [47:21] Some corporate leaders have got to be, [47:24] uh you know, Steve Jobs-like or Bill [47:26] Gates in the early days of Microsoft or [47:28] Bezos in the early days of Amazon or [47:30] Musk, [47:31] you know, [47:32] basically at times. And uh [47:35] but then some corporate leaders, like [47:37] Jennifer Doudna or even a Ben Franklin, [47:41] lead by being collaborative and [47:43] inspiring and nice. And I think the [47:46] advice any CEO needs is the oldest piece [47:49] of advice on this planet maybe for [47:51] humans, which is on the Oracle of Delphi [47:55] arch, which is just know thyself. And [47:57] you got to know, here's my approach and [48:00] here's where I feel most comfortable. [48:02] Interesting, cuz I was just about to ask [48:04] you which approach you think is [48:05] generally more effective, but [48:07] But you know, for me [48:09] I couldn't do the all-in [48:12] jerk [48:13] or you know, the [48:15] asshole-like approach. [48:17] And there were times I needed to do [48:18] that. And Jobs, Steve Jobs would say to [48:20] me it's why you were never quite as [48:23] good. But I also think that [48:26] that to you? [48:26] Yeah, he would say, you all he called it [48:29] velvet gloves. I don't know I guess he [48:31] meant it when he said people like [48:34] yourself, when you ran companies, you [48:36] had velvet gloves on and you always [48:38] trying to make people feel comfortable. [48:40] He said for me, I got to make them feel [48:42] uncomfortable. I have to make them feel [48:44] challenged. Yeah, I don't have the [48:46] luxury. I don't have the luxury of uh [48:49] uh I tolerating B players and coddling [48:52] them. [48:53] So, [48:55] I you know, I know what type I am, but [48:58] I think at times you can create a very [49:01] creative place where people feel very [49:04] comfortable [49:05] and it allows great creativity to [49:07] flourish. But I think you have to [49:09] sometimes say [49:11] we got to be hardcore here. We're being [49:13] challenged. [49:14] I would also say it's not just about the [49:17] leader. It's about the leadership team. [49:20] If you're going to make a good company, [49:22] you have to make the right team. And [49:23] when I ran CNN and Time, I realized [49:27] maybe I was a little bit too velvet [49:29] gloved as Steve Jobs would say. But I [49:31] made sure in my leadership team, there [49:33] were people who had iron fists and could [49:37] take [49:38] Intel, a great company when it was [49:41] founded and leadership team. You had to [49:43] have Andy Grove you had to have Bob [49:46] Noyce, who was the nicest [49:49] friendliest CEO ever. He [49:52] put his desk in the middle of the room [49:54] and just loved, you know, people. You [49:57] had to have somebody like Gordon Moore [49:59] of Moore's law, who was a visionary. But [50:01] you also they have to bring in Andy [50:03] Grove [50:04] who is really tough and gets the [50:06] microchips out the door. And so every [50:09] leadership team needs to have [50:12] the hammer as well as the inspiring nice [50:15] guy. [50:18] Both Steve Jobs and Elon Musk today, [50:20] what was their view on being liked as a [50:22] leader? [50:24] Both of them told me [50:26] that that could be [50:29] a failing. That that could be a [50:32] weakness. [50:33] Which is if you try too hard to be [50:36] liked, [50:37] you're not going to be disruptive [50:39] enough. [50:40] And [50:42] Musk even said empathy and collegiality [50:46] can be your enemy. [50:48] And [50:49] Jobs told me, "You think you're very [50:52] empathetic and you care about other [50:54] people's feelings. But sometimes you [50:56] take it too far [50:58] and you do it out of vanity. [51:01] You want people to like you. You care [51:03] too much about whether the people [51:05] working with you love you." [51:08] And he said, "That's not the way to [51:10] create a disruptive organization." [51:14] Did you agree with him? [51:15] Yeah. I agree. I think I ran Time [51:18] magazine just fine. You can ask other [51:21] people, but uh [51:23] uh but with CNN, [51:26] I sat there worrying about I won't name [51:28] names, but these anchors on CNN who [51:32] truly [51:33] uh were problematic, and yet I wanted [51:36] them all to like me, and I was probably [51:38] not tough enough. [51:40] But I also finally got to the know [51:42] thyself, which is, "All right, this is [51:45] not the job for me [51:47] because [51:49] I'm better off [51:51] trying to inspire teams that are [51:53] friendly and collegial. The way Jennifer [51:56] Doudna, the heroine of my book The Code [51:59] Breaker, the one who helped invent [52:01] CRISPR technology, [52:03] in her lab and in her companies, if [52:06] they're going to hire somebody new, even [52:07] a graduate student to be in, you know, [52:11] working with the pipettes and the test [52:13] tubes, [52:14] they make sure the whole team meets that [52:16] person. And then they all discuss, will [52:18] this person fit in well? [52:20] Whereas, and that's a culture that I can [52:23] relate to. [52:24] But in Elon Musk says, no. [52:27] I remember him yelling at some of his [52:29] finance people who were friendly with [52:31] some of the engineers [52:33] and said, no, collegiality is your [52:34] enemy. You do not want them to like you. [52:37] You're there to challenge them. If they [52:39] like you too much, you're not doing your [52:41] job. [52:43] But do Elon's employees like him? [52:46] Elon's employees generally [52:49] uh will walk through a wall for him, [52:52] those who have survived, whether be [52:53] Gwynne Shotwell or [52:55] uh who is a president of SpaceX or [52:58] people uh at Mark Junge Toussaint, the [53:01] people at Tesla like Drew Baglino or [53:04] Franz von Holzhausen. But he burns out [53:08] people pretty fast. So, if [53:11] he's in an organization, after a few [53:13] years, maybe 20% [53:16] are totally loyal and survive, [53:19] but he's not afraid of burning people [53:21] out and having them leave. [53:23] Sounds like they either love him or [53:25] leave. [53:26] Yeah, and as I say, sometimes with Andy [53:29] Krebs, [53:30] they love him, but then they leave, but [53:33] then they come back. Some people [53:36] truly want the challenge. As Steve Jobs [53:39] said to [53:40] Sculley, the guy he uh hired to run [53:44] uh [53:45] Apple for a while, who It was at Pepsi. [53:48] He said, "Do you want to make sugar [53:49] water the rest of your life, or do you [53:51] want to change the world?" [53:53] And I've seen Musk talk to the people at [53:55] SpaceX [53:57] late at night, maybe midnight, where [53:59] they're all still working uh at the [54:01] launchpad of the factory. [54:04] And he'll say, "I know how hard you're [54:05] working, [54:06] but this is the most exciting job you [54:09] could possibly have. It's the most [54:11] exciting, important job on Earth, which [54:13] is getting people to Mars. Whatever is [54:16] the second most exciting, you can't even [54:18] think of it what it is, because this is [54:21] by far the most exciting thing you could [54:22] be doing." And there are people who buy [54:25] into that. And I could sit there [54:28] watching the moon rise over the Gulf of [54:30] Mexico and him saying that, [54:33] and I could see why people buy into [54:34] that. I could also see why some people [54:36] say, "I'd rather have a wife and kids [54:38] and get off Friday night at 5:00 p.m." [54:41] Does he believe it when he says that? [54:43] And And do typically people believe it [54:44] when they hear it? [54:46] When he first say said to me that he had [54:50] three missions, to get humanity to Mars, [54:53] to have sustainable energy on this [54:54] planet, and to make robots safe, I [54:57] thought it was a type of pontification [54:59] you do on podcasts like this one, or pep [55:02] talks for your team. [55:04] But then I'd hear him say it over and [55:05] over again. And I'd hear him say it [55:07] almost to himself as he walked around [55:10] and saw something bad. He said, "We'll [55:11] never get to Mars. We'll never get And [55:14] almost staring into the distance [55:16] sometimes, he said, "We've got to get to [55:18] Mars. You know, we've got to If we don't [55:21] do this, we'll never get humanity to [55:23] Mars. We'll never [55:24] get the world to electric vehicles." [55:27] I totally think he believes it. [55:31] Why does he care so much about Mars? [55:34] He believes [55:36] in spacefaring. In other words, we have [55:39] to be space adventures for two or three [55:41] reasons. [55:42] One is he believes that human [55:44] consciousness [55:46] is rare and maybe unique. There's [55:47] nowhere else in the universe do we know [55:49] that there's consciousness. And why? [55:52] Because if consciousness existed [55:53] somewhere else [55:54] it probably never became multi-planetary [55:57] before the planet it was on got [56:00] destroyed. It's not something you and I [56:01] wake up worrying about, but it's a kid. [56:04] As a 15-year-old, he's worried about the [56:07] extinguishing of human consciousness if [56:09] something happens to our planet. [56:12] Secondly, he says it's the great [56:14] adventure. [56:16] We wake up every morning, we got all [56:17] sorts of problems to worry about. There [56:19] are more problems in [56:21] Ukraine to the Middle East to Congress [56:23] to, you know, whatever it may be in [56:26] Whitehall at the moment. [56:28] But we have to have our vision set on [56:31] some things that inspire us. That are [56:34] truly make humans what they are. And [56:37] there's nothing more inspiring than the [56:39] notion of being an adventure, of going [56:42] to new frontiers. And the greatest new [56:45] frontier [56:46] is space. [56:48] So, I think those are the reasons. It's [56:51] not because he wants to make money. [56:53] If you If you decide you want to be the [56:54] richest person on Earth, [56:56] you know, step one isn't start a rocket [56:59] company. [57:00] So, I think he believes in the mission. [57:03] And do you think that he's [57:05] at all scared that he might not get [57:08] there in his lifetime? [57:10] Yeah, I think that he wakes up all the [57:12] time calculating that he's 50, whatever, [57:15] two or three years old. [57:17] That maybe he's got 30 years. [57:20] Not that he necessarily wants to go to [57:22] Mars. [57:23] But he wants a mission to Mars. And he [57:25] believes it'll be within 10 years. [57:27] But he's always wrong [57:29] by [57:30] you know, two or three times I How fast [57:33] self-driving will come to be. How fast [57:35] the Cybertruck will be made. How fast [57:37] we'll get to Mars. [57:38] I think in 30 years, there will be [57:40] missions to Mars. I think in 10 years, [57:44] it's unlikely. And I think that's the [57:46] spread that he's worried about. [57:49] As someone like Elon that thinks in [57:50] terms of first principles, when he's [57:52] trying to doing those calculations about [57:54] how long he's got left to live and the [57:56] development of SpaceX and rockets and [57:58] trying to correlate whether trying to [58:00] figure out if he'll get there in his [58:01] lifetime, does he not then look at his [58:04] health and go, "Well, one way to extend [58:06] the amount of time I have on Earth is to [58:08] really obsess about my health." From [58:09] everything I've read, he doesn't seem [58:10] particularly interested in his health. [58:12] No, he makes fun of his tech bros who [58:15] are sitting there with longevity uh [58:17] plans of how they're going to live to be [58:20] much longer. [58:21] Uh and no, he does not care enough about [58:24] his health. [58:26] For a He's very He's overweight now. For [58:29] a while, a year ago, he decided [58:32] to go on an intermittent fasting diet [58:35] and also was using whatever those drugs [58:37] are called, you know, the [58:39] The diet [58:40] weight loss drugs. [58:40] Yeah, those weight loss drugs. [58:42] And I remember being with him one [58:44] morning. He I could only have one meal a [58:46] day cuz of this. And we went to [58:49] something called the Palo Alto Creamery, [58:50] I think it's called, some diner and Lil [58:53] X was with us. [58:54] And Musk ordered a double bacon [58:57] cheeseburger with sweet potato fries and [59:00] an Oreo chocolate chip milkshake [59:04] and said, "Okay, it's my one meal of the [59:06] day." And I'm thinking, [59:08] I'm not a [59:09] diet uh expert, but this does not seem [59:13] like the healthiest way to either lose [59:16] weight or remain healthy. [59:18] Does that seem like a bit of a [59:19] contradiction to you in some respects [59:21] that he's [59:21] He's not He's crazy. I mean, then, yeah. [59:24] But he's not I mean, I look at say Sam [59:27] Altman. Sam Altman is very disciplined [59:31] in both exercise and diet. Uh Jeff Bezos [59:35] is not that way. Elon's not that way. [59:38] You know, you're probably pretty good at [59:40] diet and exercise, you know, me? [59:42] I tried pretty hard, but I'm not quite [59:44] as good. Elon's [59:46] at the side where he's [59:49] he's fanatic on many many things, but [59:52] uh getting on the treadmill and taking [59:54] care of himself is not one of them. [59:56] Did you ever see him exercise while you [59:57] were with him? [59:58] He has only one home now because when [60:01] his daughter transitioned, it became [60:02] very anti-capitalist. [60:04] He thought that if selling all five of [60:07] his pretty nice homes, he would just [60:10] live very frugally and that would please [60:13] her, which didn't work. But he's got [60:15] this two-bedroom house in [60:17] a town in South Texas where Starbase is. [60:22] And there's a little room that has one [60:24] of those cross-trainers. [60:26] And every now and then, I'd be just [60:27] sitting in that house day in and day [60:29] out. He'd say, "Maybe I should use that [60:31] more. I don't use it that much." [60:34] I've never seen him say, "Well, I've got [60:38] to go to the gym." He doesn't [60:41] meditate, do yoga, swim, or do things [60:45] that would both clear your mind and [60:47] relax your body. [60:49] How would you characterize his mental [60:50] health? [60:52] Incredibly mercurial. [60:54] What does that mean? [60:55] Means that [60:57] he goes through multiple phases, [61:00] personalities. And there will be times [61:04] when he's perfectly cheerful, inspiring, [61:06] sometimes funny, [61:08] sometimes focused on engineering. [61:10] There'll be times when he gets into a [61:12] very [61:13] what Grimes calls demon mode and [61:17] he says he's probably bipolar. [61:22] He's never been diagnosed, but he uses [61:24] some medication that's been prescribed. [61:26] And so, [61:28] he will get into these mood swings where [61:32] he can be manic and depressive and [61:34] bipolar. [61:36] And so, his mental health is not great. [61:39] The difficult question in the book [61:42] wrestles with him [61:44] with this [61:46] and you said at the beginning, smart [61:47] thing you said at the beginning of this [61:49] show, [61:50] was to what extent is that woven into [61:53] who he is, and do those strands also [61:56] cause him [61:58] to have the drives? [62:00] In the time that you observed him in the [62:02] the years that you were with him, [62:04] were you ever concerned about him? [62:05] Yeah. [62:07] I mean, there are times when he would go [62:08] into what I would almost [62:11] feel was a tailspin. And even times [62:13] before I knew him, [62:15] like 2018, he goes into total meltdown. [62:18] He's [62:20] almost catatonic, lying on the floor of [62:22] the factory in Fremont, Texas, and the [62:25] people who work with him can't rouse him [62:27] cuz he's in a, you know, catatonic [62:29] state. He's sending off horrible tweets [62:32] back then, calling some cave diver a [62:35] pedophile, or saying he's going to take [62:37] Tesla private. And you see that recur [62:41] every now and then, even this past [62:43] month. [62:44] He hasn't been, as far as I know, in any [62:47] bad catatonic state, but he'll get into [62:50] a dark mood late at night and do tweets [62:52] that are conspiratorial and dark and [62:54] self-destructive. [62:57] At Christmas, [62:58] he was with his brother and some other [63:00] relatives, and they all sit around [63:02] talking. This is the day after the [63:03] server [63:04] uh farm anecdote I told you about. [63:07] And they ask, "What do you regret most [63:09] this year?" [63:10] And he says, "I regret the fact that [63:13] every now and then I start shooting [63:15] myself in the foot or stabbing myself in [63:17] the thigh that he gets into these [63:19] periods. [63:21] With all these um great leaders that [63:23] that there's a word you use throughout [63:25] which is the word team. I'm the [63:27] definition of the word company is group [63:29] of people. How do they go about hiring [63:32] great people? [63:34] With Musk, [63:36] he says that you always look first for [63:40] the right attitude. [63:42] Skills, [63:44] knowledge, [63:46] they can all be acquired. But a change [63:49] in attitude requires a brain transplant. [63:51] So, you make sure they have an all-in [63:53] hardcore [63:55] attitude. [63:56] Early on, first few years of SpaceX and [63:58] Tesla, he interviewed everybody [64:01] uh that they were hiring. [64:03] He's built a good team, but an unstable [64:06] one. People come and go more often. But [64:09] there are people like Gwynne Shotwell [64:10] who for more than 20 years has helped [64:12] run SpaceX [64:14] and Mark Junge who's been probably the [64:16] chief technology officer there. [64:19] Likewise, you have a pretty stable team [64:21] at Tesla. [64:23] Steve Jobs was [64:25] a specialist at building teams. [64:28] When he was dying, [64:30] uh I was in his backyard with him [64:33] and I asked him, "What's the best [64:34] product you ever made?" And I thought [64:36] he'd say [64:37] the iPhone or maybe the Mac. [64:39] He said, "Well, building those products [64:41] is hard, but what's really important is [64:43] building a team that will continue to [64:45] build products. So, the best thing I did [64:47] was the team at App." [64:50] And that's the Jony Ive, Phil Schiller, [64:52] Eddy Cue, [64:54] uh Tim Cook team. Musk is not [64:59] as much of a superstar building teams, [65:02] but he does get hardcore dedicated [65:05] leaders to work for him. [65:07] And do they both think that the team is [65:09] the most important thing, hiring great [65:11] people. [65:13] I would say that [65:16] Jobs definitely thought that. I think [65:18] Musk, if you ask him, would say he [65:19] thinks that. But, one of the things he [65:23] hasn't done perfectly is [65:26] if he left Tesla, you know, there's Tom [65:29] Zhu, there's uh Drew Baglino, there's [65:31] some people, [65:33] but it's not as if [65:36] he has a big team in place as easily. [65:41] Uh so, [65:43] it's he's a little bit more [65:47] the total boss. And uh [65:50] he'll not try to run everything, but [65:53] he'll focus maniacally on specific [65:55] things. [65:56] And he does not dele- I guess the best [65:58] way to say it is he doesn't delegate [66:01] authority as easily as [66:03] I think other leaders do. [66:06] On the flip side of that, [66:09] his maniacal intensity to detail [66:13] uh means that, unlike Boeing, he knows [66:15] how to get rockets into orbit. [66:18] What are the um principles of successful [66:20] leadership that both Steve and Elon [66:23] share? [66:24] First of all, a passion. Musk had a [66:27] passion for beauty and even the beauty [66:29] of the parts unseen. I remember when I [66:31] was first working [66:32] with Steve Jobs, he had the same Steve [66:35] would take me around the backyard of his [66:37] house where he grew up in a small tract [66:39] home in California. [66:41] And there was a fence, and he made me [66:43] look at the back of the fence which [66:44] faced scrubland. He said, "My dad said [66:46] we had to make the back of the fence [66:48] just as beautiful as the front of the [66:50] fence." And Steve said to his father, [66:52] "Why? Nobody'll see it. Nobody will [66:54] know." [66:55] And he said, "Yes, but you will know. If [66:57] you have a passion for perfection, [66:59] you'll care even about the beauty of the [67:01] parts unseen." And so, both Steve Jobs [67:05] and Elon Musk cared more about details [67:08] than your average CEO. They cared in [67:12] Jobs' case [67:14] how the chips on the circuit board in [67:16] the original Macintosh looked and [67:19] whether the circuit board itself was [67:21] beautiful even though nobody would ever [67:23] see it. It was in a sealed case. [67:25] And Musk the night he [67:28] the Twitter board accepted his offer he [67:30] spends 2 hours in [67:32] the tiny town in South Texas going over [67:35] a valve in the Raptor engines on the [67:37] Starship and why it was leaking and [67:39] there was a methane leak. [67:41] And just became involved in the details. [67:44] And both of them felt [67:46] that if you have a passion and intensity [67:49] on the details [67:51] the rest will follow more easily. [67:55] What what was their approach to kind of [67:57] link to that? Their approach to [67:58] experimentation. It's something that I'm [68:00] actually obsessed with [68:01] conducting as many experiments we [68:03] possibly can in the shortest amount of [68:04] time we can to get information back. [68:07] Yeah, one of the things that Musk is [68:09] successful [68:11] because of is his ability to iterate, to [68:15] take risks, to conduct experiments. [68:19] Twice now he's launched Starship, which [68:22] as I say is by far the biggest rocket [68:24] ever made. And both times you saw [68:27] stories the next day saying Musk [68:29] launches rocket and explodes. Well, he [68:31] thinks both those were a success because [68:33] he says if you're not failing 20% of the [68:36] time, you're not risking enough. And so [68:39] each of those are [68:41] attempts to figure out, to take a risk, [68:44] shoot something off and see what goes [68:46] wrong and then to fix it. If you have a [68:49] risk-averse culture like NASA or Boeing [68:52] or Lockheed or [68:54] others [68:56] you're not experimenting enough. [68:59] And [69:01] the experiment and by definition an [69:04] experiment involves the unknown and [69:07] taking a risk. [69:09] How do they keep their cultures to be [69:11] pro-risk and [69:14] um to stop them getting complacent with [69:15] their success? [69:17] Well, I don't think Musk has a problem [69:18] with complacency because he's so intense [69:20] and hardcore [69:22] that the minute [69:25] uh you know, I've watched so many [69:26] meetings where [69:29] even at Twitter where somebody says, "We [69:30] can't do this. We can't take away the [69:32] blue checks. We can't uh change from uh [69:37] carbon fiber to stainless steel on a [69:39] particular compound. Or we can't do [69:42] Cybertruck cuz Cybertruck is too edgy [69:44] and it's made of stainless steel and it [69:48] is frightening to look at and it'll [69:50] scare people." [69:52] And he'll just [69:54] either run roughshod over them or fire [69:56] them [69:57] or push them to realize, "Yeah, let's [70:00] make Cybertruck look very futuristic and [70:03] let's make it totally out of stainless [70:06] steel. And let's have the stainless [70:08] steel be an exoskeleton so you don't [70:11] have to have internal chassis as much." [70:14] These are wild out-of-the-box things. [70:17] And they resisted him on Cybertruck. [70:19] They resisted him on Starship. They [70:22] resisted him [70:23] on [70:24] even some of the battery changes he's [70:26] made or things. [70:29] But or resist him on the amount of [70:31] servers you need at uh Twitter or the [70:35] rules for engagement on Twitter. [70:38] I think sometimes it doesn't work. I [70:39] think Twitter [70:41] is [70:42] kind of toxic in places cuz he thought [70:44] you could get rid of the moderation [70:46] teams and do it through an algorithm. [70:50] But he pushes things [70:53] 80% of which succeed. It means there's a [70:56] lot of rubble in the wake, though. [70:59] Do you Do you think that someone [71:00] delusional, these people? [71:02] I think they're crazy and [71:04] as Jobs would say, crazy enough to think [71:06] they can change the world and thus they [71:07] become the ones who do. [71:11] Delusional, the phrase they used for [71:14] Steve [71:16] was reality distortion field, which is [71:18] just a [71:20] geek geek's way of saying delusional. [71:22] Meaning uh [71:24] you can wish something and think hard [71:26] enough on something [71:28] and try to make it happen. And often it [71:31] worked. With Jobs, he'd say [71:34] you got to shave 10 seconds off the boot [71:35] up time. And they'd say, that's reality, [71:37] can't be done. And he'd say, he'd stare [71:39] without blinking, something his guru had [71:41] taught him in India. He'd say, don't be [71:43] afraid, you can do it. And they would [71:45] bend reality and 80% of the time he'd [71:48] get it done. Sometimes it didn't work. [71:50] He tried it on his cancer. [71:53] It didn't work. [71:54] Uh he made he just tried to will it [71:56] away. [71:57] Likewise with Musk. [72:00] Full self-driving. I mean, for the past [72:03] 10 8 years he's always said it's only a [72:05] year away. We're going to get there. [72:07] Well, that's reality distortion. [72:10] He's driven his team to go further with [72:12] machine learning on full self-driving [72:14] than most companies. [72:16] But it's also a reality distortion that [72:19] hasn't yet paid off. [72:22] Deadlines. You talked kind of about it [72:23] there. [72:24] That's the same thing, which is [72:27] being delusional about deadlines, but [72:29] they're forcing functions. [72:32] As [72:33] Musk himself said when I was talking to [72:36] him once, I said, deadlines, man, you [72:37] always He says, yes, but I'm a [72:40] specialist at turning the impossible [72:43] into the merely very late. So, he misses [72:46] deadlines, but he tends to eventually [72:49] deliver. [72:50] The The reason he's setting deadlines, [72:51] even though he knows sometimes they [72:53] might not be hit is because it speeds up [72:55] the team. [72:57] Yeah, he says you a all in intensity, [73:02] a hardcore intensity is our operating [73:05] principle. [73:07] And you're not going to have that [73:08] without deadlines. I remember so many [73:09] times they were what he his team calls [73:12] surges. [73:14] I'd see it happen almost every month in [73:16] a different field. He'd say, "All right, [73:19] we have to stack this rocket by Friday." [73:23] And they'd say, "You know, no, it's [73:25] going to take months." No, it needs to [73:26] be stacked by Friday. And they'd work [73:28] around the clock and do it. And then a [73:30] few weeks later he'd be on a [73:32] house where they were putting a Tesla [73:35] solar [73:36] uh pan- solar roof tiles. [73:40] And he'd say, "You have 24 hours to redo [73:43] this house." They'd say, "Well, that's [73:45] nuts." [73:46] But he'd be there at midnight on top of [73:48] the roof. [73:49] Himself. [73:49] Himself. With a little ax playing on the [73:51] cables down below. And he would use it [73:55] as a forcing function. [73:59] It drove the teams crazy, but it drove [74:01] them to do things they didn't think they [74:02] could do. [74:03] Is he happy? [74:04] No. He's somebody who not only is not [74:07] usually happy, [74:09] but he doesn't value happiness. If you [74:11] said, "What are the top 10 things you [74:13] want in life?" [74:15] I don't think happiness, [74:17] pleasure, [74:19] calmness, sweetness, [74:21] going to the beach, none of those would [74:23] be in the top 10. [74:25] He [74:27] uh Talulah Riley who lives here, who was [74:30] married to him, the English actress, [74:32] great English actress, [74:35] she said, [74:36] "He's not the type who can stop and [74:38] savor [74:39] or smell the flowers. He doesn't want to [74:42] sit back and be content and be happy." [74:45] And I asked him about I said, "Okay, [74:47] were you ever happy of what you've [74:48] achieved?" He said, "No, I'm like a [74:50] video game addict. [74:52] When I get to one level of the game and [74:54] I've succeeded, all I can think about is [74:57] moving to the next level of the game, be [74:59] it Elden Ring or Polytopia." [75:01] Is that common amongst the great leaders [75:03] that you've studied? [75:04] No, it um [75:07] was It was definitely true of Steve [75:09] Jobs, who [75:11] having built the great computers, [75:13] suddenly says, "I want a thousand songs [75:15] in my pocket." And then, when he has the [75:17] iPod, it's so successful and all he does [75:20] is worry about the fact [75:22] that something bad could happen. He [75:23] says, and then he says, "Well, what if [75:25] people, the brain-dead people who make [75:27] cell phones, realize they could put [75:29] music on cell phones? Then we'd be out [75:31] of business." So, he starts working on [75:33] the iPhone and the iPod team says, [75:35] "Well, that's going to cannibalize us. [75:36] That's going to hurt our business." He [75:37] said, "We have to be able to cannibalize [75:39] ourselves or other people will eat us [75:41] for lunch." [75:42] And likewise, Musk is always pushing for [75:47] the next thing [75:49] as opposed to happiness. Is that true of [75:51] everybody? No, I mean, Jeff Bezos has [75:54] the biggest yacht you can imagine and [75:56] more vacation homes. [75:58] Uh and he's happier, I think. I mean, he [76:03] likes to savor his success. [76:06] It's also true that his space company, [76:09] Blue Origin, hasn't yet gotten anybody [76:11] into orbit. I don't know [76:14] if there's a particular trade-off there, [76:16] but I know Musk would say, [76:19] "Yeah, I could be on a yacht somewhere, [76:22] but that's not what I want." [76:24] Do you think Jeff and uh Steve [76:26] Do you think Elon likes Jeff? [76:29] I think they're competitors and there's [76:31] two chapters in the book called Bezos [76:33] and Musk, where they compete compete for [76:37] a pad at Cape Canaveral, the storied pad [76:39] 39A, where they get into big disputes [76:42] and lawsuits over satellite levels. [76:45] Musk says if but I want Bezos to [76:49] succeed. I want him to be driving us [76:51] into space cuz the more do it the [76:53] better. I wish he would get out of his [76:56] hot tub and off his yacht more often so [76:58] that Blue Origin could be more [77:00] successful. So that's not exactly a [77:02] compliment. [77:04] Uh they don't hang out together, but I [77:07] know that Musk respects Bezos. Bezos [77:11] once tried [77:13] to [77:14] patent [77:16] the concept of a self-landing [77:19] a booster rocket that could land upright [77:21] and be reused. [77:23] Which Musk was already working on. And [77:26] the idea that Bezos would try to patent [77:28] the idea [77:29] went caused Musk to go ballistic. But [77:32] since then he hasn't gone ballistic on [77:34] Bezos and that got resolved. [77:37] How did Steve Jobs change you? [77:40] I think that Steve and all the people [77:43] I've written about caused me to think [77:46] more about what's the larger mission. [77:51] And [77:53] to care about [77:55] even things people couldn't see. As I [77:58] said, like the circuit board inside the [78:00] Mac. [78:01] And you always know whether you're [78:03] cutting corners. When you're writing a [78:05] book, doing a podcast, starting a [78:07] company. [78:09] And [78:11] being honest with yourself about that [78:15] is you know, I admire deeply Steve [78:18] Jobs's passion for beauty. [78:21] His passion for the product. [78:24] And all of them felt [78:26] they weren't trying to make the most [78:28] money or build the most valuable [78:30] company. Although they did. Apple [78:32] becomes that, you know. Tesla becomes [78:35] that. They become the richest people. [78:38] But they're doing it not for a passion [78:40] for profits, but a passion for the [78:42] product. [78:44] And specifically Elon, spending that [78:46] time with him. [78:49] Yeah. [78:49] You know, I go I go back to the know [78:52] thyself. [78:53] I can admire Musk. I can respect what he [78:56] does. [78:58] I also know it's [79:00] the price he pays for his success [79:04] is a price that I think is too high for [79:06] me, meaning I'm not going to be that [79:09] rough on the people around me. I've been [79:11] married more than four almost 40 years [79:14] and you know, I [79:15] care [79:17] about this balance of work and life and [79:20] other thing. Musk doesn't care about [79:22] that. So, [79:24] I know [79:26] that each of us has to decide how do we [79:30] do the balances [79:32] that make us feel the most comfortable. [79:36] And I watch Elon and can admire [79:39] his intensity, [79:42] but also [79:44] know the downsides [79:46] of it. And then in a more complex way, [79:49] which is what the book is about, [79:52] understand how the downsides, [79:55] and you said this at the very beginning [79:56] of the show, [79:58] the downsides [80:00] and bad traits are so interwoven [80:04] with the good traits [80:06] that you can't disentangle the fabric. [80:10] The algorithm you write about in the [80:11] book. [80:14] This five-step approach that Elon takes [80:16] towards what a product development. When [80:17] I read about it, it kind of just seems [80:19] like more of the same Elon, which is [80:20] like this sense of urgency, speeding [80:22] things up and caring a lot about the [80:23] small stuff. Is that your [80:24] characterization of the algorithm? And [80:26] what is the algorithm? [80:27] Well, the algorithm goes back to what [80:29] you called first principles, which is [80:31] step one of the algorithm, is question [80:34] every rule. Question every requirement. [80:36] If somebody says we need to have a felt [80:38] pad between the battery and the chassis, [80:40] and you you you say, "Why?" And they [80:42] say, "Well, it's a regulation or it's a [80:44] rule." And you say, "Who made that rule? [80:46] Who made that? Who does it really work? [80:48] Bring me the person, the name of the [80:50] person who actually made it, and let me [80:52] grill that person to see if there's a [80:54] physics reason that has to happen." [80:57] And so, that's step one in the [80:59] algorithm. And step two is a Steve Jobs [81:02] step, which is simplify. Even on the [81:05] iPod, when Steve made it, it's like, [81:08] "I want to be able to get to any song [81:10] with only three clicks. I don't want a [81:11] whole lot of buttons. I don't want a [81:13] manual." And they eventually make the [81:15] most beautiful, simple thing that it [81:17] becomes the iPhone after a while. [81:19] Intuitive. Nobody has to read the manual [81:21] for how to use an iPhone. So, step two [81:24] is simplify. Then you speed up the [81:25] processes, and final step is automate. [81:29] And the [81:30] problem Musk said is when you try to [81:32] automate processes that you should have [81:34] deleted, you're not going to do it. But [81:36] it's [81:38] it's not just the algorithm. It's the [81:40] algorithmic way of thinking, which is [81:43] the manufacturing matters as much as the [81:46] design of the product. So, he puts his [81:48] engineers and designers [81:50] with their desks facing the assembly [81:52] line. So, every hour they can watch if [81:56] there's a hold-up, if there's something [81:57] that's [81:58] uh a piece of, you know, strip around [82:01] the headlight, or uh wiring in the [82:04] Raptor engine that's causing a hold-up [82:07] in the manufacturing process, the [82:09] engineers and designers can see it every [82:11] hour, which is why he doesn't do what [82:13] most automakers now do, which is send [82:16] something off and outsource all the [82:18] manufacturing. He's got to watch it [82:20] happen. [82:20] And people write He makes people write [82:22] their name on the parts of the rocket [82:23] that they're responsible for. [82:24] Yeah, and you got a [82:27] it's like, [82:28] who's in charge of it? Who's in charge [82:29] of this valve? And who's in charge of [82:31] the cost of this valve? And who's going [82:33] to get this valve to be [82:35] uh cost [82:37] down by 80%? And if you don't think you [82:40] can do it, your name is on that mission, [82:43] then step aside. [82:45] You know, [82:46] we're not going to tolerate people who [82:48] can't be on the mission. [82:50] A quick word on Huel. As you know, they [82:52] were sponsor of this podcast and I'm an [82:53] investor in the company. [82:54] It is finally here. Three years of work [82:56] from Huel to try and make a bar, a snack [82:59] bar that is nutritionally complete. As [83:01] of the recording of this episode, they [83:03] finally released these bars that are [83:05] high in protein, 27 vitamins and [83:08] minerals, and just 2 g of sugar. The [83:11] impossible has been done. And it tastes [83:13] so god damn good. Often these snack [83:15] bars, these like high protein snack [83:16] bars, taste like you're eating Play-Doh [83:19] or cardboard or something. It's so hard [83:22] to make one that is nutritionally [83:23] complete and that tastes good. And [83:26] ladies and gentlemen, here we have it. [83:27] I'm going to put the link in the [83:28] description to get your bar below. Try [83:30] it out and tag me and let me know [83:32] exactly how you get on because it's so [83:34] nice to finally have a bar that is [83:36] nutritionally complete and that actually [83:37] doesn't taste like cardboard and that [83:39] tastes delicious. [83:41] The impossible has been accomplished. [83:43] You mentioned your own family and your [83:45] own relationships. [83:47] Last question is about Elon's love life. [83:52] You know, Elon loves drama and turmoil, [83:55] right? That's from childhood. He [83:58] associates it with childhood and love. [84:01] And whether it's at Twitter or at SpaceX [84:04] or [84:05] Tesla, he's always surging and wants [84:07] drama. [84:09] Well, for better or worse, I would say [84:11] for worse, [84:12] his [84:13] emotional, personal love life tends to [84:16] be [84:18] that way. [84:19] He likes drama and fighting and [84:22] intensity [84:24] in his relationships. [84:26] Of the people he's been with, most have [84:29] had this fiery intensity to them. From [84:32] his first wife, Justine, [84:35] all the way through Amber Heard, who [84:38] I think's legendary in the intensity, [84:41] shall we say, of the relationships. [84:43] And to some extent, Grimes, now. [84:46] There've been a couple of exceptions, [84:47] one of whom I mentioned is Talulah [84:49] Riley, whom he was married to, [84:52] uh English actress, and she's great and [84:56] loving and calm and was a calming [84:59] influence and was the best thing to [85:00] happen to him, in my opinion, when it [85:02] came [85:03] to romance. [85:05] But he always valued the intensity [85:10] and she, [85:12] rightly, knew herself and said, "This is [85:16] amazing and I really [85:20] love everything happening, but this is [85:22] not who I am. I'm [85:23] want to be back in a [85:26] more calm environment." And eventually, [85:28] she leaves and comes back to England. [85:31] So, with his own children, his lovers, [85:33] his wives, there is the same intensity [85:37] that's baked into everything he does. [85:39] But he seems to have a longing to be [85:41] with somebody. He seems to be [85:42] He's always afraid of being alone. He [85:44] said that he was so lonely as a child [85:48] that his biggest fear is being alone. He [85:50] always loves having one of his children. [85:54] I mean, down at the rocket launch, [85:55] there's Griffin, there's X, he was uh [85:58] someone He has a child [86:01] uh who's very autistic and, you know, [86:04] needs a minder, generally. I mean, [86:07] enough so [86:09] uh that he's still a very wise [86:13] uh teenager and even asks things like, [86:16] "Why doesn't the future look like the [86:17] future, Dad? Which is one of the things [86:20] that spurs Elon into making Cybertruck [86:23] so futuristic. [86:24] So, he always likes having some of his [86:26] children around him. He always likes [86:29] having a companion. [86:31] But, that doesn't mean he likes [86:33] calmness. [86:34] It's very interesting. [86:36] We have a closing tradition on this [86:37] podcast where the last guest leaves a [86:38] question for the next guest not knowing [86:40] who they're going to be leaving the [86:41] question for. [86:41] Uh-huh. [86:42] And the question that's been left for [86:44] you, [86:46] with all you know about the nature of [86:49] what it is to live a happy, successful [86:51] life, [86:53] what do you think is the single most [86:56] important characteristic to be happy and [86:59] or to be successful? [87:02] Knowing your mission and knowing [87:04] yourself. I mean, maybe that's two [87:06] things, but it took me a while to know [87:08] myself, meaning what I was good at as a [87:12] leader and what I didn't want to be good [87:14] at. [87:15] But, also I know the mission that I'm [87:17] trying to do [87:19] in life. [87:20] And it's not getting humanity to Mars. [87:23] It's not the grandest of all missions. [87:26] But, [87:27] uh I think [87:31] if you know yourself and what you value, [87:36] then the happiness follows. [87:38] And what is your mission? [87:40] My mission is that [87:43] there's certain [87:44] things that inspire us. [87:47] That make us aim higher and make us [87:49] better. [87:51] And as a journalist, as a writer, [87:55] and now as a biographer and historian, I [87:58] like to tell the stories [88:01] about people who moved us, who rippled [88:05] the surface of history. And from those [88:08] lessons, we all, in a smaller way, [88:12] can [88:13] be on a journey [88:15] that's not just about ourselves. [88:18] When I speak to my college students [88:21] there's always good graduation speakers [88:23] that say, "Follow your passion." And I [88:25] say, "No, it's not about your stupid [88:27] little passion. It's about connecting [88:29] your passion to something higher than [88:31] yourself. So, figure out what that [88:33] mission is for you. And I do it through [88:35] storytelling. [88:37] Now, storytelling isn't as elevated as [88:40] rocket building or auto making. [88:43] But, it is the oldest, most venerable, [88:48] valuable way we have of passing on [88:53] values. is telling stories. Whether it's [88:58] around first campfire ever built, or [89:01] whether it's Homer doing it in the [89:03] Odyssey, or the Bible with a great [89:05] opening sentence, "In the beginning," [89:08] {comma} telling us these stories. [89:11] I think there's a role in society for [89:14] storytellers that try to make us better. [89:20] Well, you have [89:22] very much taken on that role in a [89:24] remarkable way. I very rarely [89:27] pre-order or pre-save books ever. But, [89:30] based on the books you've written [89:31] previously, this was one of the books [89:33] that I bought on both audiobook and both [89:35] physically, and it [89:37] far exceeded my expectations because of [89:39] the depth and detail you go into these [89:41] people. This is not a surface level from [89:43] a distance audit or analysis or [89:46] deconstruction of these individuals. It [89:48] is as if you are living in their mind [89:50] and writing from the place of their [89:51] mind. And for someone like me who I [89:53] think of myself at the start of my [89:55] career that wants to do great things [89:57] Yeah. [89:58] knowing everything about these [89:59] individuals that you've covered allows [90:01] me to pick and choose elements that will [90:05] get me closer towards my own [90:09] version of happiness and success. And I [90:11] think know thyself is such an important [90:13] thing when you read these books because [90:15] you have to assemble the parts of an [90:17] Elon or a Steve Jobs or [90:19] a Jennifer and take from them um to [90:22] complete your own little jigsaw piece. [90:24] And we're all our own individual shapes. [90:26] There'll probably never be a a book [90:29] ever that comes close to the detail and [90:31] depth of insight and understanding and [90:33] storytelling which is so unbelievably [90:36] as this one that's written on Elon Musk. [90:37] So it's it's a must-read for everybody [90:40] regardless of what discipline or pursuit [90:41] you're in. I think it's just an absolute [90:43] fascinating read about trauma, about [90:45] humanity, about humans, and about what [90:47] it takes to reach the very top. So [90:49] Walter, thank you for the service to [90:51] humanity that you've done by the work [90:53] that you do. It's an a huge honor to get [90:54] to meet you today. [90:55] Well, it's a huge honor to get to meet [90:57] you and an actual pleasure, too. [90:59] Thank you. [91:02] Quick one, I discovered a product which [91:04] has changed my life called Eight Sleep. [91:06] This product, Eight Sleep, which are a [91:08] sponsor of this podcast, has been a [91:09] revelation in my life because the Eight [91:11] Sleep Pod Cover, which is basically a [91:13] fitted sheet that goes over your [91:14] mattress, controls the temperature of [91:17] your bed throughout the night. And it [91:19] follows nature's natural rhythm. It [91:21] starts cool, gets colder while you go [91:23] into different phases of sleep, and then [91:24] heats up slightly as you wake up in the [91:26] morning, which is effectively guiding [91:28] you to have a deeper, more restorative [91:31] sleep. I genuinely think of all the [91:32] things that we would include in health [91:34] and fitness, I think sleep now is the [91:37] the most important factor, the thing [91:39] that I'm thinking about most often every [91:42] single day. When I wake up in the [91:43] morning, the first thing I do is I check [91:45] my sleep, and I use that information to [91:46] determine how to proceed in that day, [91:49] how hard to work out, how many meetings [91:51] to have, what I need to cancel, what [91:53] time I need to get to bed. So to [91:54] celebrate them being a new podcast [91:56] sponsor, I always want to get a discount [91:57] for you guys, and I've got one. Go to [91:59] eightsleep.com, which is [92:01] eightsleep.com/steven. [92:06] And if you do that, you'll save $150 [92:09] on the pod cover that I have on my bed, [92:11] the one I'm talking about. Grab your pod [92:13] cover, send me a DM, and let me know how [92:16] you get on. [92:18] Do you need a podcast to listen to next? [92:20] We've discovered that people who liked [92:22] this episode also tend to absolutely [92:25] love another recent episode we've done. [92:27] So, I've linked that episode in the [92:29] description below. I know you'll enjoy [92:31] it.