Tim Dillon Sees Gen Z Workplace Tactics Exposing Corporate Exploitation

Tim Dillon (Comedian): The Boomers Are A Selfish Generation And Gen Z Has Exposed Society's Scam! — The Diary Of A CEO

The Diary Of A CEO

Younger workers exploit corporate taboos and remote-work loopholes to undermine a system that offers them no path to traditional home ownership or financial security.

AI-assisted summary of Tim Dillon (Comedian): The Boomers Are A Selfish Generation And Gen Z Has Exposed Society's Scam! — original source. Check the original for full context.

Source published:

Detailed notes

## Background Published on YouTube by the channel The Diary Of A CEO on April 4, 2024, this episode features comedian Tim Dillon in a detailed conversation hosted by Steven Bartlett. According to the show description, the interview explores Dillon's journey from a closeted drug addict and his upbringing with a schizophrenic mother to his stand-up success, podcasting career, and broad critiques of generational dynamics, AI, and social media.

## TL;DR Tim Dillon traces how his turbulent childhood, raised by a mother with schizophrenia, and his early struggles with closeted cocaine addiction inadvertently honed his improvisational comedy skills. He reflects on reaching rock bottom, finding sobriety, and transitioning into stand-up and long-form podcasting without relying on political correctness or sanitized corporate approval. The discussion spans sharp social commentaries on Gen Z work culture, the Boomer generation's selfishness, Hollywood's superficiality, and the ongoing crises in men's mental health.

## Atmosphere & style The conversation balances raw, vulnerable self-reflection with rapid-fire, cynical satire. Host Steven Bartlett provides a grounded, supportive space that allows Dillon to pivot effortlessly between dark childhood trauma, addiction milestones, and outrageous, unscripted riffs on modern culture. The resulting atmosphere feels unvarnished, darkly funny, and intellectually honest as Dillon dissects absurd societal trends without self-censorship.

## Key takeaways - [02:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=121s) Tim Dillon's agility as an improv comedian stems from living a double life as a closeted gay cocaine addict between ages 13 and 25, where lying and improvising under pressure were survival mechanisms. - [03:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=203s) Growing up with a mother diagnosed with severe schizophrenia shaped Tim's acute understanding of the fragility of mental health and the constant lingering threat of sudden chaos. - [11:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=669s) Lack of parental structure led Tim into severe substance abuse starting in middle school, culminating in an acid trip during his 8th-grade graduation and 14 years of total sobriety today. - [17:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=1030s) Tim hit absolute rock bottom at age 25 when he woke up in an egret's nest in the Long Island Sound after a late-night boating crash, prompting him to attend his first AA meeting. - [24:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=1467s) Serving as a juror on a high-profile Long Island police informant murder trial forced Tim to confront mortality and justice, accelerating his decision to turn his life around through comedy. - [29:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=1765s) Comedians are fundamentally meant to act as non-moral, absurd entertainers crossing lines for laughs, rather than societal leaders, moral guides, or targets for political cancellation. - [36:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2169s) Celebrity podcast deals frequently fail because hyper-managed, corporate-created stars have nothing raw or unscripted to say, unlike early unfiltered podcasting pioneers. - [39:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2382s) Baby Boomers represent a deeply selfish cohort of paranoid hoarders clinging to homes and political power, transforming from 1960s hippies into a materialistic generation. - [45:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2704s) American politics fails to attract top young talent because public toxicity and system corruption push ambitious minds toward finance or tech rather than holding public office. - [49:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2944s) Following his mother's passing, Tim developed a more spiritual perspective on life, accepting death as a liberation from physical suffering and recognizing that career accolades hit an emotional ceiling. - [01:20:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=4851s) Gen Z has correctly identified modern corporate structure as a scam, using identity dynamics, workplace taboos, and remote-work loopholes to manipulate the system to their benefit. - [01:25:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=5106s) Rapid AI advancements will easily displace generic, uninspired social media influencers while severely disrupting creative entertainment logistics and production pipelines. - [01:30:26](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=5426s) Rising male mental health crises, isolation, and addiction stem partly from continuous societal narratives dismissing male vulnerability while condemning traditional status aspirations. - [01:34:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=5644s) Culturally, society encourages women to aggressively pursue corporate wealth and status as 'girl bosses' while hypocritically demonizing figures like Andrew Tate for offering men the exact same advice.

## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=0s) Intro

The episode kicks off with Tim Dillon taking aim at Generation Z and their unique knack for working the modern corporate system to their advantage. He quips about Zoomers realizing the whole setup is a scam, inventing mental health issues, taking endless personal days, and keeping their bosses too intimidated to question them. "Why are you late?" Dillon mimics. "I'm gay." "Don't worry about it," comes the immediate corporate backdown. Following a preview of upcoming topics—from his early life as a closeted addict to the absurdity of social media influencers and AI—host Steven Bartlett steps in with a quick subscriber plea before diving into the interview.

* **Key Themes:** Gen Z work culture, corporate social dynamics, comedy preview. * **Standout Quote:** *"We've bred some of the least interesting people on the planet. Influencers... these generic barcodes with feet, those people don't need to exist. They need to be replaced by an AI version of that."*

---

[02:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=121s) I Was a Closeted Gay Addict

Steven compliments Tim on his status as one of the most exceptional, provocative, and quick-witted improv comedians in the world, asking where that specific skill set was forged. Tim traces his ability to think on his feet directly back to a chaotic period of his life between ages 13 and 25, when he was a closeted gay cocaine addict.

When living a double life at a young age, Tim explains, survival requires a constant ability to lie, filibuster, and improvise under pressure. While he acknowledges that these talents didn't stem from healthy origins, he notes with dark humor that the resulting agility serves him well on stage today.

* **Age Range of Addiction/Closeted Era:** 13 to 25 years old. * **Key Insight:** Survival mechanisms and deceit from active addiction accidentally laid the foundation for quick-thinking comedy.

---

[03:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=203s) Which One of Your Parents Were Depressed?

Steven brings up a recent conversation with British comedian Jimmy Carr, who told him that when meeting a comic, you don't ask if *they* are depressed—you ask which of their *parents* was depressed. Tim accepts the premise but raises the stakes immediately, noting that his mother was schizophrenic. In the hierarchy of mental illnesses, he jokes, schizophrenia is the "gold standard," making standard depression look almost mild by comparison.

Tim details what schizophrenia looked like through the eyes of a 12- or 13-year-old child. It was a disorienting haze of paranoia, confusion, and elaborate fabrications. Unlike physical illness, which a child can easily grasp because they have experienced being sick, severe mental illness is nearly impossible to process at that age.

* **Family Mental Health:** Mother diagnosed with schizophrenia; father experienced periods of depression. * **Onset Period:** Symptoms began severely manifesting when Tim was around 12 or 13 years old. * **Key Dynamic:** The confusion of trying to discern reality when a parent presents grand, untrue stories as fact.

---

[05:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=344s) The Impact of Your Parent's Mental Illnesses on You

Growing up with a mother with schizophrenia was a stark, jarring experience, particularly when Tim visited friends' homes and witnessed normal family interactions. His mother was naturally eccentric, fun, and a free spirit who loved him deeply, meaning his childhood wasn't purely hellish. However, the reality of her condition was inescapable. He recalls a specific moment in the car when she calmly told him that people were following them—not to harm her, but to *protect* her. Internalizing that "doubly crazy" claim was the moment young Tim realized something was fundamentally wrong.

This environment left lasting marks on Tim's worldview. It gave him an acute understanding of the fragility of human mental health and the constant, lingering sense that a breakdown or crisis is always right around the corner. He also had to watch the brutal physical toll of her psychiatric medications, including visible tremors and involuntary rocking back and forth.

* **Medical Reality:** Schizophrenia as a degenerative disorder without a true cure; side effects of anti-psychotic medications (tremors, tardive dyskinesia). * **Emotional Impact:** A sense of grieving a loved one bit by bit while they are still alive.

---

[09:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=545s) Your Parents' Divorce

The onset of his mother's severe symptoms coincided with his parents' divorce. Tim believes the immense stress of the split acted as a catalyst that triggered or accelerated her underlying genetic predilection for schizophrenia. Even before the full breakdown, her behavior included compulsive obsessions—such as hoarding entire McDonald's Disney toy sets, collecting Beanie Babies, and pulling junk off the street insisting it could be refurbished into valuable antiques.

Tim jokes that the paranoid, conspiratorial things his mother used to say in the 1990s are now routinely uttered by members of Congress, noting she could have made a great living on YouTube if it existed back then. Because he was raised in an extended Irish Catholic family, the mental illness was met with deep denial; relatives brushed off her severe condition by using polite euphemisms, calling her "fun" or "eccentric" rather than addressing the crisis.

* **Family Structure:** Only child; no siblings to share the burden. * **Cultural Framing:** Irish Catholic taboo surrounding mental illness led to denial and minimization ("Patty's just fun").

---

[11:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=669s) Childhood Trauma & Taking Drugs

Tim clarifies that while his mother hated drugs, alcohol, and cigarettes, her worsening mental health and his father's absence left him essentially raising himself. By the time he hit middle school, that complete lack of structure combined with unprocessed trauma pushed him straight into substance abuse.

He started smoking marijuana in the summer between 7th and 8th grade after befriending an older local girl—a rollerblading goth lesbian who was constantly high. Within a single year, his drug use escalated dramatically into cocaine, acid, ecstasy, and Special K (ketamine). In an infamous milestone, he dropped acid right on stage during his 8th-grade graduation ceremony.

* **Timeline of Substance Use:** * *7th/8th Grade:* Marijuana. * *8th Grade:* LSD (dropped acid at graduation), cocaine, MDMA (ecstasy), Ketamine. * **Sobriety Milestone:** Completely sober from all drugs and alcohol for 14 years at the time of recording. * **Retrospective View:** Acknowledges the self-destructive harm, but refuses to sanitize the past—admitting that at the time, running wild on drugs with friends was also genuinely fun.

---

[14:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=894s) Hitting Rock Bottom

Even amidst the heavy drug abuse, Tim was always the comedic goofball of his group, driving around the wealthy neighborhoods of Long Island smoking weed, mocking the empty mega-mansions, and doing dark impressions of deceased teachers. However, as he entered his twenties, the lifestyle spiraled toward a grim dead end.

By age 25, Tim had hit absolute rock bottom. He was living in Baldwin, New York, in a house he purchased with a risky subprime mortgage. He was a deeply closeted alcoholic working at a failing mortgage brokerage in a bleak Long Island industrial park years after the 2008 financial crash had already decimated the industry. He paints a grimly hilarious picture of his office mate: a man losing his own home to foreclosure who spent his entire workday ignoring his screaming wife on the phone while obsessively trying to order live koi fish for a backyard pond.

* **Location:** Baldwin, Long Island, New York. * **Age at Rock Bottom:** 25 years old. * **Circumstances:** Deeply closeted, active alcoholic, subprime mortgage holder, working in a crumbling mortgage bank post-2008 crash.

[17:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=1030s) Hitting Rock Bottom in an Egret's Nest

Recounting the chaos of his early twenties, Tim shares stories about hanging out with a friend's wild, unemployed father who sold drugs and had racked up three DWIs and a "BWI" (boating while intoxicated)—a rare badge of honor. He fondly recalls a night at a Long Island tiki bar where the father promised to buy everyone's drinks, pointed to Tim and his friends, and gave a thumbs-up to the bartender. An hour later, the group was handed a $2,500 bill because the father, who had been drinking on a tab there for two days with no money, had tricked them into covering his balance.

The ultimate turning point came at age 24 while speed-boating late at night through the dark waters of Freeport. The boat slammed full speed into a marsh, hurling Tim headfirst out of the vessel. He regained consciousness at 1:00 AM, lying directly inside a nest surrounded by white egrets in the middle of the Long Island Sound. Soaked and dazed, he realized he could have easily been paralyzed or killed, marking this absurd yet terrifying moment as his absolute rock bottom and the impetus to attend his first AA meeting.

- A BWI (boating while intoxicated) is an achievement because of how difficult it is to get caught and charged with one on the water. - The friend's father had run up a $2,500 bar tab over two days before tricking Tim and his friends into taking over the bill. - The crash took place in the waters off Freeport, Long Island, leaving Tim stranded in an egret's nest.

[19:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=1180s) "Lisa's Lounge" and the Decision to Get Sober

Tim describes the depressing atmosphere surrounding his local haunt, a dive bar called Lisa's Lounge located just up the block from his foreclosed childhood home. The bar was named by a grieving father after his daughter who had been killed by a drunk driver. Bizarrely, her picture hung on the wall where patrons would regularly raise their glasses to toast "To Lisa!" while getting heavily intoxicated. The bar owner openly admitted he opened the place so people with nowhere else to go had a spot on Christmas, right before snorting a line of cocaine off the pool table.

Seeing late-stage alcoholics at Lisa's Lounge every single night provided Tim with a bleak, terrifying mirror of his future. He realized that staying on this path was a fate "worse than death"—a life defined by fear, wasted potential, and sitting at a bar drinking alongside strangers like "Marge." Driven by a core belief that a better life was possible through sobriety and honesty, he made the firm commitment to change.

- Lisa's Lounge was named in memory of a girl killed by a drunk driver, yet hosted a nightly community of severe addicts. - Tim felt that rotting away in a neighborhood dive bar was scarier than death because it represented total surrender and failure. - As a child actor between ages 6 and 13, Tim had toured in *Annie Get Your Gun* alongside his mother and appeared on *Sesame Street* before quitting to do drugs at 13.

[24:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=1467s) The Murder Trial and Finding Comedy

Around the exact same time he began getting sober at age 25, Tim served as a juror on a high-profile murder trial in Long Island. A police informant had murdered the mother of his children after authorities repeatedly ignored multiple orders of protection to keep receiving his tips—a scandal that later led to an $8 million settlement for the victim's family. Initially taking the jury duty assignment out of boredom, facing the daily weight of mortality and justice forced Tim to reflect deeply on his own chaotic existence and reinforced his need to turn his life around.

Navigating early sobriety and 12-step programs proved exceptionally challenging, particularly the requirement to practice absolute honesty and deliver direct, humiliating apologies to people he had wronged or stolen money from. Shortly after getting sober, he took a leap of faith by stepping onto the stage at a stand-up comedy open mic held in a joint coffee shop and tattoo parlor in Merrick, Long Island.

- The Long Island murder case involved severe police malfeasance, eventually resulting in an $8 million payout to the victim's estate. - The hardest parts of the 12-step program for Tim were vulnerability, finding a "higher power," and making restitution for lying and stealing. - His first open mic was performed over the buzzing sound of tattoo needles as patrons got old relationship tattoos redesigned into patriotic 9/11 tributes or missiles. - Unlike his past failed identities, finishing his first set gave Tim a rare, unshakable certainty that comedy was what he was meant to pursue.

[29:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=1765s) Taboos, Correctness, and the Role of the Comedian

When asked about the ongoing clash between political correctness and stand-up comedy, Tim dismisses the hyper-fixation on outrage, echoing George Carlin's rule that a comedian's job is to find the line and cross it. He acknowledges that while dark humor isn't for everyone, the backlash often comes from unhappy individuals who take jokes literally and thrive on being offended. Tim argues that society has spent the last four years paying far too much attention to outraged critics and columnists who hold no actual power.

He emphasizes that comedians are essentially "clowns" whose primary objective is to be funny, not to be right, moral, or politically correct. Comparing stand-up to serious professions, he notes that while a surgeon cannot afford to "wing it," a comic's duty is to explore absurd, stupid, or wrong ideas for the sake of a laugh. Expecting comedians to act as moral leaders confuses their role in culture, as true authority and real power rest in the hands of corporate CEOs and politicians rather than people telling jokes in night clubs.

- "As George Carlin said, your job is to find out where the line is, cross it..." - Tim views outrage over comedy as absurd because comics possess only soft cultural influence, not real societal power. - He asserts that a comic's primary job is entertainment, with shedding light on truth being a purely secondary byproduct.

[33:20](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2000s) Being "Uncancelable" and Ranting on Podcasts

Addressing a viral clip where he jokingly expressed frustration that Joe Rogan gets targeted for cancellation while he gets ignored, Tim rejects the idea that he is truly "uncancelable." Instead, he attributes his immunity to the fact that he presents as a self-aware "goofball" wearing ridiculous glasses whose statements frequently blur the line between serious commentary and complete absurdity.

Having produced over two hours of weekly broadcasts for eight straight years, Tim explains that the sheer volume of his unscripted, rambling output makes it nearly impossible for even him to keep track of what he says on air. Because his audience understands that his rants oscillate wildly between sharp satire and nonsensical gibberish, his commentary resists easy outrage or takedowns.

- Tim has been hosting and recording long-form weekly podcast broadcasts for over 8 years. - His comedic style relies on blending absurd exaggerations with satirical social commentary so rapidly that listeners cannot take every statement literally.

[34:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2043s) The Craft of Comedy and Shooting from the Hip

Tim Dillon reflects on his comedic style, describing how his thoughts unfold organically when he sits down to talk. Some of the most absurd things he says start intelligently, while seemingly intelligent thoughts often begin absurdly. For him, the joy of podcasting lies in not having a rigid agenda; having a pre-planned message would make him bored instantly. Instead, he simply reacts to what he sees, candidly asking himself what he actually thinks about a given topic. He acknowledges that his over-the-top, goofy nature sometimes makes his critics look foolish because they take his wild exaggerations far too seriously.

Comparing his approach to other major podcasters like Joe Rogan—whom he places alongside *The Diary of a CEO* as running the largest shows in the world—Dillon notes that Rogan does deep research, reads books, and conducts serious interviews. Dillon, by contrast, relies on "shooting from the hip." He jokes that he will often dismiss a news story, only to read the third paragraph halfway through a rant and realize, "Oh, this is a problem," causing him to abruptly flip his stance mid-sentence.

- Dillon praises Joe Rogan as one of the most generous figures in entertainment, emphasizing how Rogan uses his massive platform to promote comedians, writers, and journalists. - He notes that appearing on Rogan's show was a pivotal turning point in his career, largely because their on-air chemistry mirrors their genuine, unfiltered private conversations.

---

[36:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2169s) Why Celebrity Podcasts Fail and Hollywood's Banal Reality

Examining the evolution of the podcasting industry, Dillon contrasts early pioneers like Joe Rogan, Adam Carolla, and Marc Maron—who started before money or mainstream cool was involved—with the recent wave of celebrity podcasters. He argues that major platforms like Spotify are rolling back massive media deals with A-list stars because most celebrities simply "have nothing to say." He quips that mainstream celebrities are essentially "created in a laboratory," citing his own talent agency, CAA, as an example. Corporate teams of PR managers, agents, and lawyers construct a sanitized persona, telling stars what parts of their past to highlight, what to hide, and to "leave the Confederate flag at home."

Giving a microphoned, hour-long platform to these highly managed, uninspired individuals inevitably backfires. Dillon dispels the popular conspiracy theory that Hollywood is entirely run by "satanic pedophiles eating children," suggesting that while some sinister elements exist, the truth is far more mundane: Hollywood is largely filled with remarkably boring, banal people created by corporations. What drives everyday people mad is realizing just how uninteresting these celebrities are despite their immense wealth and massive estates. In Dillon's view, celebrities should be restricted to brief, scripted appearances on red carpets where they say two or three pre-approved words like "climate change" before collecting an award.

- Dillon references Spotify's multi-million dollar deal with figures like Meghan Markle, agreeing that the platform made a mistake giving astronomical sums to talent who cannot sustain raw, unscripted commentary. - He jokes that he should have received that money instead, adding that he would have gladly stayed in a royal castle regardless of the public scrutiny. - For Dillon, the core appeal and magic of podcasting lie in being completely unfiltered, free, and having fun.

---

[39:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2382s) Gen Z Violence, AI, and the Boomer Generation

When asked for his read on current generational dynamics, Dillon sarcastically declares that society has completely "given up on the children." Rather than viewing the next generation as the future, society has shifted its focus and excitement entirely toward AI and robotics. He paints a grim, satirical picture of modern youth as "dead-eyed little monsters" raised by algorithms, abusing fentanyl, and committing random acts of violence for online clout.

To illustrate this, he points to a real-world case in Gilbert, Arizona, where a group of wealthy teenagers recorded violent attacks on random peers to post on TikTok, ultimately resulting in a murder. Dillon lambasts the local police department for ignoring the pattern for a year because the perpetrators were affluent white kids, acting as though it was just "a couple of kids having fun... how people grow up."

Turning his attention to the Baby Boomers—the subject of his upcoming book—Dillon describes them as the ultimate selfish generation. He characterizes them as paranoid hoarders who refuse to leave their massive McMansions, relinquish their jobs, or yield political power, literally "collapsing in Congress" and "dying in the Senate." He argues that Boomers exposed the lie of the 1960s hippie movement, proving they were never truly progressive; they were merely selfish drug addicts who swapped LSD for money, transforming into a materialistic, soulless cohort. Despite—or because of—their total lack of concern for their children or the planet's future, Dillon considers them the funniest generation to ever live.

- Dillon half-jokingly proposes forcibly evicting Boomers from their homes and committing them to mental institutions, noting he consulted lawyers but ran into legal hurdles. - He categorizes Millennials as an insecure, ribbon-seeking generation whose politics are purely aesthetic, constantly crowdsourcing opinions to be told they are "good" to fill the void left by their Boomer parents. - He views Gen Z (Zoomers) as skeptical self-starters and independent thinkers, though severely undermined by viral violence, fentanyl vapes, and social media addiction. - As a sarcastic fix for youth disaffection, Dillon suggests bringing back the military draft so young people can "go die in the Ukraine so that Boeing can make some money."

---

[45:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2727s) The Decline of American Politics and Personal Goals

Dillon expresses zero optimism about the future of the country, dismissing the idea that upcoming elections will resolve core societal issues. Addressing the aging political class, he points out that leaders like Joe Biden and Donald Trump highlight a complete lack of new, capable political talent in America. Dillon argues that nobody wants to run for office anymore unless they are "psychotic." The country's brightest, most ambitious young minds refuse to enter politics because the media dissects their personal lives and the system is deeply corrupt; instead, they would rather "go to Miami and trade Bitcoin on a yacht."

As a result, the nation is governed by octogenarians suffering from visible cognitive decline who barely comprehend modern technology like TikTok, relying on their grandchildren to explain it to them while eating lobsters on estates in Maine. Regarding potential social media bans, Dillon humorously admits he supports banning TikTok purely out of spite because he has no followers on it, though he acknowledges it is a destructive cultural force.

Looking ahead in his career, Dillon shares a deeply personal goal: creating a movie or television show centered around the Boomer generation and the eccentric environment in which he grew up. He wants to capture the unique, dark humor of his friends' parents and immortalize that era before that generation passes away entirely.

- Dillon notes that Biden appeared surprisingly energetic during his State of the Union address, joking that handlers "shot him up with something." - He emphasizes that political office no longer attracts genuine leaders due to lower financial incentives compared to tech or finance, coupled with intense public toxicity. - His primary creative objective remains telling authentic, hilarious stories about his childhood and the distinct Boomer culture that shaped him.

[49:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2944s) Processing Childhood Trauma and the Death of His Mother

Reflecting on his childhood trauma, Tim Dillon notes that processing early life experiences isn't something that can easily be fully wrapped up in a single lifetime, though he has managed to process a significant portion of it. He explains that mental health requires ongoing effort and that there is always room to reach a better place emotionally. His perspective on his mother's struggles shifted dramatically following her passing in August, roughly six months prior to the interview.

He recounts hosting his mother and extended family—including his cousins and aunt—at his house on Long Island for a gathering shortly before her passing. Looking back at her life, he recalls that while the end was extremely difficult, her early years were filled with joy: she was married to his father for ten years before having him, loved surfing and boating, spent time in Florida, and was voted best looking in her high school. He humorously frames her life as "the front nine were good, the back nine were a little tough."

Dillon reflects on how his outlook has grown increasingly spiritual over time. Raised Catholic, he rejects the institution’s scandals and specific dogmas while maintaining a belief in a spiritual dimension, the soul, and life beyond physical existence. Seeing his mother trap-bound in a deteriorating body and mind made him realize that forcing her to stay alive would have been selfish; her death ultimately brought a sense of relief and liberation.

- **Mother's early life:** Married 10 years before having Tim; enjoyed boating and surfing in Florida; voted best looking in high school. - **Family gathering:** Hosted a gathering at his Long Island home with extended family, including his aunt and cousins, shortly before his mother died. - **Spiritual shift:** Raised Catholic; retains belief in the soul and a spiritual realm while rejecting institutional abuses.

---

[53:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=3214s) Therapy, Aging, and Evolving Beyond Career Ambition

Addressing therapy, Dillon shares that while he has attended therapy in the past and acknowledges its benefits, he is not currently seeing a therapist due to his heavy touring schedule. As he navigates his late 30s, he has noticed a fundamental shift in what brings him fulfillment. He emphasizes that at a certain age, career achievements hit a emotional ceiling—even as success grows, the personal joy derived purely from individual accolades begins to dim.

Instead of an ego-driven "me, me, me" mindset, he finds himself deriving genuine happiness from community, helping others, being part of something valuable, and celebrating other people's accomplishments. He notes that while professional goals remain, they no longer serve as the primary source of personal happiness.

---

[54:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=3298s) The Separation of the Public Persona and the Real Self

When asked about the side of him that audiences rarely get to see, Dillon acknowledges the inherent division between a public comedy brand and a private human being. While he maintains that his core opinions on his podcast are completely authentic—stating that his off-screen conversations at dinner mirror his podcast rants rather than hiding a secret double life—he points out that he has many personal interests outside of comedy, such as his thoughts on spirituality, that simply don't fit the comedic format of his show.

Addressing his creative process on podcasts and guest appearances (such as on *The Joe Rogan Experience*), Dillon explains that his long-form, riffing style is completely unscripted. He compares his comedic improvisation to his past habits as a drinker: he used to sit at bars and talk about the news, and now he does the exact same thing completely sober.

> "I look at a landscape of stories and articles... I don't have an agenda. I'm not sponsored by the person in this article... What's the funniest take, and how does this explain something larger that's going on?"

---

[58:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=3504s) Coming Out, Dating, and Relationship Dynamics

Dillon discusses coming out as gay at around 25 years old, jokingly remarking that by modern standards that is relatively late, given that "statistically today most people come out at the age of two." He attributes his lack of long-term, marriage-track relationships to his hyper-fixation on establishing his comedy career during his 20s and 30s, acknowledging that using career focus as an excuse was partly a form of self-centeredness.

He observes that while many comedians marry within the industry because standard partners struggle with the lifestyle, he prefers dating people completely removed from the entertainment world. He describes his current dating life as casual rather than searching for a serious partner, though he remains far more open to long-term connection now that his career is established. He also reflects on how childhood observations of parental relationships shape adult expectations of love and commitment.

- **Age coming out:** Approximately 25 years old. - **Dating preferences:** Prefers dating outside the comedy industry to maintain separation between work and personal life. - **Relationship status:** Currently dating casually rather than pursuing immediate marriage or family.

---

[01:01:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=3711s) Resilience, Overcoming Addiction, and Daily Self-Improvement

When asked what he values most about himself, Dillon points to his extreme resilience and refusal to make excuses. Recognizing that many people facing similar childhood trauma and addiction end up remaining trapped in self-pity or destructive cycles, he credits his ability to handle rejection, dust himself off, and relentlessly pursue his goals on his own terms.

> "Growing up the way I grew up, there's a version of me that's just a druggy, that's just on the street, that's dead, that is blaming everyone else... I could have been that guy. I was that guy for many years... I'm happy I was able to get rid of that."

He clarifies that achieving sobriety isn't the end of self-improvement, but rather the baseline from which real personal growth starts. Now sober, he focuses on fundamental life improvements: eating better, improving sleep quality, going on dates, actively listening to others, and avoiding falling back into old coping mechanisms like lying, drinking, or substance abuse.

[01:05:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=3908s) Managing Mental Health and Escaping the Internet

Tim Dillon reflects on his personal strategies for managing mental health, dryly observing that as a comedian, his approach is far from perfect—otherwise, he wouldn't have ended up in comedy in the first place. For him, staying sane involves simple, grounding habits: talking to people, taking long walks, helping others, expanding his spiritual life, and striving to be a better person. He emphasizes the importance of avoiding the "insanity" of the world, which is amplified by spending too much time online, obsessing over things outside of one's control, and remaining trapped in one's head.

Dillon argues that modern digital platforms are actively toxic, particularly for younger generations. He points out how absurd it is that tech companies deny any link between their products and youth mental health crises, joking that they act as though launching a new app called "Suicider" or releasing harmful filters has zero connection to rising suicide rates. As he has grown older, he views the internet primarily as a tool for his career rather than a substitute for real life. Real-world human interaction, reading a book, or sitting on a beach offer far more genuine value than endless scrolling.

- **Key Coping Mechanisms**: Long walks, real-world human interactions, service to others, and spiritual growth. - **Critique of Tech Companies**: Satirizes corporate denial regarding the negative mental health impacts of social media apps on youth. - **Personal Shift**: Views online engagement strictly as a career requirement, prioritizing off-screen real life as he gets older.

---

[01:07:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=4047s) Free Speech, Twitter, and Handling Online Feedback

When host Steven Bartlett brings up Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter (X) and whether it balanced the scales regarding free speech, Dillon agrees that the purchase was positive. He notes that Twitter had become a primary example of censorship in American society. While he hesitates to call Twitter a true "town square," recognizing it as an chaotic battleground where people go to fight, he appreciates that users now have a space to speak more freely without heavy-handed censorship.

Regarding public criticism and online feedback, Dillon admits that everyone gets bothered by it, but he actively limits his exposure to audience reactions. He warns that tailoring creative work to satisfy audience feedback can destroy the authenticity and beauty of what made the art good in the first place. Instead of letting online comments dictate his creative mind, he relies on simple personal metrics: whether the work makes him laugh, whether people he trusts enjoy it, and standard comedy metrics like ticket sales.

- **On Elon Musk's Twitter Acquisition**: Views it as a beneficial move against censorious trends, even if the platform remains chaotic. - **Dealing with Feedback**: Ignores online comment sections to avoid letting public perception warp his artistic voice. - **Key Success Metrics**: Self-satisfaction, approval from trusted peers, and ticket sales.

---

[01:09:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=4186s) Global Comedy Touring and the Absurdity of Wealth

Dillon discusses his upcoming tour across the UK and Europe, highlighting his show at London's iconic Royal Albert Hall. When mentioning stops in places like Finland, Manchester, and Liverpool, he shares an anecdote about a Finnish fan who messaged him saying, "It's not London and it's not the Hamptons... but it's what we have," a level of grounded self-awareness he deeply admires. Describing his live comedy set, Dillon explains that it dives into dark, topical humor touching on cultural trends, social media toxicity, homelessness, and cancel culture.

The conversation shifts to London's real estate, specifically One Hyde Park in Knightsbridge. Dillon expresses a fascination with the building—the most expensive residential real estate in the world—not out of a desire to live there, but because of what it represents. He describes it as a symbol of the "utter coldness, emptiness, and banality" of extreme wealth, where ultra-wealthy individuals store capital in vacant buildings. Recalling a wild show in Dublin where an audience fight broke out over religious slurs, Dillon remembers shouting at the crowd: "This is why Dubai is winning! Look at you people... You're all potatoes screaming at other potatoes that they're slightly different kinds of potatoes!"

- **Tour Highlights**: Performances scheduled at the Royal Albert Hall, Manchester, Liverpool, and across Europe. - **Observation on One Hyde Park**: Uses the ultra-exclusive Knightsbridge property to illustrate the hollow banality of extreme wealth. - **Dublin Stand-Up Anecdote**: Calmed a chaotic, drunk crowd by pointing out the absurdity of their infighting compared to global economic shifts like Dubai's rise.

---

[01:15:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=4503s) The Hollow Reality of Hollywood and Los Angeles

Dillon dismantles the glamorous British perception of California, calling the Hollywood image a total lie built by television. While the state possesses stunning natural beauty, Dillon describes the people living in Los Angeles as "empty," "fractals," and "figments of your imagination" who do not exist in reality the way normal people do.

He explains that LA operates on a pervasive psychological fear because every person—from a high-level studio executive down to a busboy hoping for a spot at the Hollywood Improv—feels completely replaceable. As a result, the entire town consists of "people waiting for instructions." Rather than holding core beliefs or acting independently, people wait for a corporate consensus to dictate what is currently acceptable, whether that means showcasing non-traditional body types one day or reverting to standard Hollywood tropes the next.

> "Everybody in this town is replaceable. Everybody feels that... So, everybody's waiting for instructions. Nobody wants to act. Everybody's waiting for somebody else to let them know what's okay."

- **The LA Psyche**: Defined by deep-seated insecurity, replaceability, and a lack of genuine personal convictions. - **Systemic Conformity**: Entertainment professionals wait for cultural directives before committing to any idea or trend. - **Silver Lining**: Jokes that despite the psychological hollowed-out nature of the city, "the tacos are good."

---

[01:17:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=4660s) The American Dream and the Myth of Unlimited Potential

Bartlett contrasts Dillon's take on LA with the traditional British view of the American Dream—the belief that anyone can come to America, work hard, and become whatever they want. Dillon acknowledges that America markets this concept exceptionally well, but argues that the narrative leaves out the harsh realities and compromises required to achieve high-level success. Telling an eight-year-old child they can become President of the United States is misleading because it ignores the grueling, dirty journey involved.

Dillon asserts that telling masses of people they can achieve anything without regard for reality, personal talent limitations, or their actual willingness to work hard does a massive disservice. Blanket promises of unlimited potential set people up for deep frustration and unhappiness when faced with the actual demands of real-world accomplishment.

- **Deconstruction of the American Dream**: Argues the traditional myth ignores personal limitations and the severe sacrifices required to reach the top. - **Critique of Modern Advice**: Rejects the blanket sentiment that anyone can be anything without factoring in hard work and reality.

[01:19:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=4770s) Decoding the "American Dream" Slogan

Tim Dillon critiques the ubiquitous slogan "you can be anything you want to be in America," calling it little more than a bumper sticker, license plate, or T-shirt catchphrase rather than a true life philosophy. While people are certainly capable of doing great things—in the U.S. or the UK—the actual translation of the phrase in American culture is simply "you can make as much money as you want." The culture aggressively promotes an upwardly mobile, vertical path where one must grab power, run an empire, and become a boss to achieve happiness.

However, Dillon argues that working oneself to death isn't actually the path to true fulfillment; it is merely what society pushes so that individuals remain productive cogs in the wheel without questioning the system.

* The phrase "you can be whatever you want" translates culturally to "work yourself to death." * Upward mobility and entrepreneurship are sold as the sole avenues to human happiness.

---

[01:20:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=4851s) How Gen Z Discovered Society's Scam

Unlike previous generations, Gen Z has largely realized that the system is a scam. Dillon fully supports their response, pointing out that once you recognize a scam, it makes sense to navigate it like a scammer or con artist. Rather than burning out, younger workers leverage workplace taboos, weaponize HR language, and manipulate corporate anxieties to do the bare minimum while demanding full respect and job security.

Whether taking endless days off, citing non-existent mental health struggles, or using identity chips to intimidate superiors, Gen Z has exposed the flaws in corporate culture. Dillon views this not with disdain, but as a hilariously pragmatic strategy: they are simply using the exact playbook corporate America handed them.

* **Corporate dodge tactics:** Employees use phrases like "you're using volume right now" or "you keep coming into my physical space" to halt criticism. * **Quiet quitting:** Leveraging remote work post-pandemic to do minimal labor while retaining full pay. * **Self-preservation:** Utilizing workplace diversity policies and mental health claims as shielding tools against performance evaluations.

---

[01:25:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=5106s) The AI Revolution and the Death of "Generic" Influencers

Turning to the rapid rise of artificial intelligence, Dillon highlights how profoundly AI is disrupting creative industries like film, writing, and acting. He cites filmmaker Tyler Perry halting an $800 million studio expansion after seeing AI-generated locations, noting that entire auxiliary industries—such as set decorators, prop rental houses, and location managers—face severe disruption.

Dillon reserves his sharpest critique for generic social media influencers who hawk skincare products using identical, scripted promo codes. Because these influencers lack distinct depth or original artistry, replacing them with AI avatars will be completely unnoticeable to the public. However, replacing iconic talent like Robert De Niro or Tina Turner presents a far steeper hurdle.

* Tyler Perry paused an **$800 million studio expansion** due to advancing AI text-to-video tools like OpenAI's Sora. * AI influencers with hundreds of thousands (and millions) of followers are attracting genuine engagement and romantic interest from lonely followers.

---

[01:28:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=5280s) The Corporate Dystopia: "You'll Own Nothing and Be Happy"

Dillon paints a dark, satirical vision of the modern socio-economic trajectory. As massive institutional funds like BlackRock acquire real estate and price ordinary citizens out of home ownership, physical property and tangible assets are becoming permanently out of reach for younger generations. In place of real-world ownership, corporations offer digital substitutes: social media avatars, virtual opinions, and AI companion relationships.

In this techno-dystopian future, real-world cities face physical decline while individuals remain isolated inside tiny pods, comforted by AI influencers and online commentary. The system strips away physical autonomy and digital privacy, replacing tangible prosperity with the illusion of participation.

* Major investment firms are locking average buyers out of housing markets, turning ownership into a luxury reserved for the super-rich. * Digital platforms offer virtual avatars and online commentary as substitutes for real-world equity and influence.

---

[01:30:26](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=5426s) Men's Mental Health and the Trap of Tribalism

Addressing the growing crisis in men's mental health—marked by rising rates of loneliness, addiction, and suicide—Dillon critiques the cultural tendency to dismiss male struggles. While society claims to prioritize mental health, young men hearing constant narratives that they are inherently toxic, sexist, or privileged are left isolated and unsupported when trying to navigate an increasingly difficult world.

Instead of fragmenting society into warring identity groups, Dillon advocates for returning to shared human values. Trying to force everyone to share identical political or cultural worldviews—especially in a country as vastly diverse as the United States—is a futile effort. True progress relies on respecting differences and allowing individuals to build communities around common principles rather than aggressive tribalism.

* Men face alarming spikes in social isolation, porn addiction, and suicide. * Dillon argues that cultural discourse frequently dismisses male vulnerability with "you've had it good, shut up," undermining genuine mental health efforts. * Society must transition away from atomized identity battles toward value-driven communities.

[01:34:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=5644s) Andrew Tate and Social Double Standards

Tim addresses his perspective on Andrew Tate, having had him as a guest on his podcast. Describing him as "very, very, very lovely" and a nice guy in person, Tim clarifies that while Tate says "wacky things" and shouldn't be running for office, his massive appeal stems from addressing men's core desire for respect and status. Tate preaches financial independence, physical fitness, and high status—traits that are both demonized by critics and universally coveted.

Tim points out a stark cultural double standard in how society treats material ambition. Celebrating female CEOs, praising "girl bosses," and encouraging women to pursue wealth and status at events like the Aspen Ideas Conference is universally cheered. Yet, when Tate tells men to build their financial standing to earn respect and attract women, it is endlessly demonized as toxic advice, even though both sides are chasing the exact same material accomplishments.

- **On Meeting Tate:** Found him polite in person; notes that like many public figures, he says outlandish things but isn't meant to be a senator. - **The Core Message:** Young men gravitate toward Tate because he offers a playbook for earning respect, getting fit, and reaching financial status. - **The Double Standard:** Encouraging women to pursue wealth and material corporate success is celebrated cultural discourse, while telling men that money brings status and romance is condemned.

[01:36:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=5810s) The Closing Tradition: A Shameless Apology

Steven explains the show's signature closing tradition: answering an anonymous question left by the previous guest on a card deck. After learning that the deck features QR codes linking to videos of guests answering their questions, Tim reads his prompt: "Who should you have apologized to but didn't, and why?" Without missing a beat, Tim delivers a classic satirical response, naming Meghan Markle as the person he owes an apology to.

Tim hilariously breaks down his "full circle" moment with Markle following the launch of her lifestyle brand, *American Riviera Orchard*. He admires how she leveraged all the social capital built from claims of royal mistreatment to sell glassware and dishes for drinking Chardonnay in Santa Barbara. Expressing genuine respect for her pure "shamelessness" and top-tier career climbing, Tim jokes that he would love to be hired by her brand, praising her transition from a C-list Hollywood actress to living in a Montecito mansion as a masterclass in getting results.

- **The Question:** "Who should you have apologized to but didn't, and why?" - **The Sarcastic Apology:** Apologizes to Meghan Markle for ever doubting her "level of shamelessness." - **American Riviera Orchard:** Mocks her lifestyle brand, describing its collection of glassware and dishes as "three words that don't really make sense together, but yet sound lovely." - **The "Climber" Dynamic:** Notes that while she supposedly hates privilege and class, she built an empire right in Montecito, proving that despite any criticism of her character, her status-climbing results are unmatched.

[01:40:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=6021s) Sincere Regrets and Closing Compliments

When Steven pushes past the satirical Meghan Markle answer and demands a genuine response, Tim softens and reflects on his past addiction. He shares that if he could speak to his late grandmother, he would apologize for how much anxiety and worry his self-destructive drug habit caused her. Recognizing her as a deeply positive force in his life, he reflects on how young, reckless people rarely realize how much stress their late nights and erratic behavior inflict on the family members who care about them.

Steven wraps up the interview by expressing deep gratitude, calling Tim potentially his favorite comedian. He admits that during dark or difficult moments, he turns to Tim's comedy because it represents the "unacceptable," taboo side of the brain that people aren't usually allowed to explore publicly. After plugging Tim's upcoming "American Royalty" tour—highlighting his show at the Royal Albert Hall in London alongside sarcastic dismissals of stops in Finland—the two share a warm farewell.

- **Genuine Apology:** To his deceased grandmother, for being an inconsiderate addict and causing her constant worry. - **Host's Praise:** Steven shares that Tim's raw, boundary-pushing humor brings him joy during stressful times by exploring topics others are afraid to touch. - **Tour Details:** Tim promotes his "American Royalty" tour across the UK and Europe, naming London's Royal Albert Hall as the crown jewel of the run.

## Notable quotes > [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=0s) We've bred some of the least interesting people on the planet. Influencers... these generic barcodes with feet, those people don't need to exist. They need to be replaced by an AI version of that. — Tim Dillon

> [29:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=1765s) As George Carlin said, your job is to find out where the line is, cross it... — Tim Dillon

> [54:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=3298s) I look at a landscape of stories and articles... I don't have an agenda. I'm not sponsored by the person in this article... What's the funniest take, and how does this explain something larger that's going on? — Tim Dillon

> [01:01:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=3711s) Growing up the way I grew up, there's a version of me that's just a druggy, that's just on the street, that's dead, that is blaming everyone else... I could have been that guy. I was that guy for many years... I'm happy I was able to get rid of that. — Tim Dillon

> [01:09:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=4186s) This is why Dubai is winning! Look at you people... You're all potatoes screaming at other potatoes that they're slightly different kinds of potatoes! — Tim Dillon

> [01:15:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=4503s) Everybody in this town is replaceable. Everybody feels that... So, everybody's waiting for instructions. Nobody wants to act. Everybody's waiting for somebody else to let them know what's okay. — Tim Dillon

> [01:22:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=4929s) you're using volume right now — Tim Dillon

> [01:22:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=4929s) you keep coming into my physical space — Tim Dillon

## Mentioned Tim Dillon, Steven Bartlett, Jimmy Carr, George Carlin, Joe Rogan, Adam Carolla, Marc Maron, Meghan Markle, Andrew Tate, Elon Musk, Tyler Perry, Robert De Niro, Tina Turner, Joe Biden, Donald Trump, The Diary Of A CEO, The Tim Dillon Show, Tim Dillon: A Real Hero, American Royalty, Annie Get Your Gun, Sesame Street, Rolling Stone, YouTube, Netflix, Spotify, CAA, TikTok, Twitter, X, BlackRock, Aspen Ideas Conference, OpenAI, Sora, Royal Albert Hall, Lisa's Lounge, Gold Tree Studios, Sunset Strip, West Hollywood, Baldwin, Freeport, Long Island, Gilbert, Arizona, London, Manchester, Liverpool, Dublin, Finland, Dubai, Montecito, Santa Barbara, Knightsbridge, One Hyde Park, Boeing

[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8)

中文简报

Tim Dillon 认为 Z 世代职场策略揭露了企业剥削 年轻员工利用企业禁忌和远程办公漏洞,来反抗无法为他们提供传统购房途径或财务保障的体制。 Tim Dillon 追溯了由患有精神分裂症的母亲抚养长大的动荡童年,以及早年在隐瞒可卡因成瘾中挣扎的经历,是如何在无意中磨练了他的即兴喜剧技巧。他回顾了跌入人生谷底、走向戒瘾清醒,并在不依赖政治正确或企业粉饰性认可的情况下,转向单口喜剧和长篇播客的历程。本期讨论还广泛涉及对 Z 世代职场文化、婴儿潮一代的自私、好莱坞的虚浅表面,以及男性心理健康持续危机的犀利社会评论。 蒂姆·狄龙(Tim Dillon)即兴喜剧的敏捷反应源于13至25岁期间隐瞒同性恋身份并深陷可卡因成瘾的双重生活,在高压下说谎和临场发挥成了他当时的生存手段。 (2:01) 由于母亲患有严重的精神分裂症且家庭缺乏管束,狄龙自初中起便严重滥用药物,甚至在八年级毕业典礼上吸食LSD,如今他已彻底戒毒戒酒14年。 (11:09) 在深夜快艇事故后于长岛海峡的白鹭巢中醒来,让狄龙意识到自己跌入人生谷底,随后参与长岛一桩谋杀案的陪审团经历更促使他直面生死并决心投身喜剧。 (17:10) 狄龙强调喜剧演员的本职是寻找边界并跨越界限以逗笑观众,而非充当道德领袖;同时指出由公关团队包装的名人播客因缺乏真实、未经审查的内容而注定失败。 (29:25)

Reading summary

Comedian Tim Dillon argues that modern American economic and social structures have deteriorated into transparent scams, prompting Gen Z to cynically manipulate workplace protocols while an entrenched older generation hoards assets and political power. Dillon attributes his satirical, improvisational worldview to surviving a chaotic youth shaped by his mother's severe schizophrenia and his own battle with substance abuse. Addiction, Family Illness, and the Comedy Pivot (2:01) Dillon traces his comedic reflexes directly to surviving as a closeted cocaine addict between ages 13 and 25, where continuous deception and fast-talking under pressure functioned as essential survival mechanisms. This instability was exacerbated by his mother's onset of severe schizophrenia when he was 12 or 13. Raised in an extended Irish Catholic family, Dillon observed relatives minimize her paranoia as mere eccentricity. Following his parents' divorce, a lack of parental supervision pushed him into severe substance abuse by middle school, including marijuana, cocaine, ketamine, and LSD, which he took during his eighth-grade graduation. By age 25, Dillon hit rock bottom in Baldwin, New York, burdened with a subprime mortgage and working at a failing mortgage brokerage after the 2008 financial crash. Following a late-night boat collision in Freeport that launched him into an egret's nest, and confronted with the grim future modeled by patrons at a local dive bar, he entered 12-step recovery. A simultaneous stint on a Long Island murder trial jury prompted him to confront his mortality, leading him to try stand-up comedy at a local open mic. At the time of recording, Dillon had achieved 14 consecutive years of sobriety. Generational Conflict: Boomer Hoarding and Gen Z Subversion (39:42) Dillon describes Baby Boomers as an exceptionally selfish cohort that abandoned 1960s countercultural values for unchecked materialism. He criticizes older generations for refusing to yield corporate power, McMansions, or government roles, noting that elderly politicians remain in office despite visible physical decline. In Dillon's view, Millennials remain insecure conformists crowdsourcing validation, whereas Gen Z has correctly recognized that the conventional American Dream of working oneself to death in pursuit of vertical mobility is a scam. Instead of demonstrating corporate loyalty, Dillon observes that Gen Z workers pragmatically leverage human resources policies, remote work, and identity politics to avoid labor while securing employment. By invoking mental health days and weaponizing workplace taboos against management evaluations, younger employees mirror corporate America's own manipulative tendencies. Dillon endorses this calculated self-preservation, arguing that treating an exploitative corporate framework like a con game is the only logical response. Institutional Conformity and the Role of Comedians (29:25) Dillon dismisses the premise that stand-up comedians must serve as societal moral arbiters. Aligning with George Carlin's view that a comedian's role is to locate and cross societal boundaries, Dillon argues that outrage culture stems from unhappy critics taking jokes literally. He asserts that comedians wield only soft cultural influence, whereas true societal accountability rests with corporate executives and politicians. His own unscripted podcasting format relies on rapid exaggeration and satire, deliberately resisting rigid ideological agendas. Examining the wider media landscape, Dillon characterizes mainstream Hollywood and Los Angeles as culturally hollow environments driven by insecurity and replaceability. He rejects sensationalist conspiracies about entertainment figures, asserting instead that corporate teams manufacture sanitized, banal celebrities who lack authentic insight. Dillon points to major streaming networks canceling lucrative celebrity podcast deals—such as Spotify's partnership with Meghan Markle—as evidence that heavily managed public figures cannot sustain unscripted formats, whereas unscripted independence remains essential for engaging commentary. Technological Alienation, Dispossession, and Male Isolation (88:00) Dillon envisions a bleak socio-economic trajectory shaped by artificial intelligence and institutional asset accumulation. As institutional investment funds like BlackRock acquire residential properties, homeownership becomes increasingly unattainable for younger generations, who are relegated to renting and offered virtual avatars as substitutes for tangible assets. Dillon notes that rapid AI developments—evidenced by filmmaker Tyler Perry halting an $800 million studio expansion after reviewing text-to-video tools like Sora—will disrupt production trades while rendering scripted, generic social media influencers obsolete. Within this disconnected landscape, Dillon points to an accelerating crisis in men's mental health marked by rising rates of isolation, addiction, and suicide. He criticizes cultural narratives that dismiss male vulnerability under assumptions of universal privilege. Regarding controversial figures such as Andrew Tate, Dillon argues that Tate's massive following reflects young men's unaddressed desire for physical competence, financial independence, and respect. Dillon highlights a societal double standard that celebrates female corporate climbing while condemning identical status-seeking ambitions in men. Dillon's assessment presents a society dominated by institutional stagnation, corporate banality, and asset dispossession, viewing individual sobriety and grounded real-world relationships as primary defenses against digital alienation. However, his analysis leaves open whether Gen Z's workplace subversion and pragmatic disengagement represent a durable coping mechanism or merely a temporary retreat from permanent economic disenfranchisement.

精炼阅读摘要

喜剧演员Tim Dillon在接受Steven Bartlett专访时指出,现代美国社会的经济与职业神话本质上是一场骗局,婴儿潮一代以自私姿态垄断资源与权力,而Z世代则看破了这一机制并通过操弄企业文化进行被动防御。 成瘾、家庭创伤与即兴喜剧的渊源 (2:01) Dillon将自己敏捷的即兴讽刺能力归结于青少年时期的生存策略。他在13岁至25岁期间隐瞒同性恋身份并深陷可卡因与酒精成瘾,必须依靠持续说谎与即兴应变维持生活。他的母亲在其12至13岁时确诊精神分裂症,家庭伴随父母离异陷入偏执与失序,但爱尔兰天主教家庭背景对这一危机长期选择否认与美化。由于缺乏管教与原生家庭支撑,他在初中时期开始滥用大麻,随后在8年级毕业礼上服用LSD,并逐步升级到可卡因、摇头丸与氯胺酮。 24至25岁时,Dillon的生活跌入谷底。在经历了一次快艇冲撞长岛长滩并昏迷于白鹭巢穴的意外后,他目睹了社区酒吧“Lisa's Lounge”中酗酒者的绝望宿命,意识到这种沉沦比死亡更可怕。在2008年次贷危机后的破产抵押贷款公司工作期间,他同时在一桩涉及800万美元赔偿的谋杀案中担任陪审员。直面死亡与正义促使他加入戒酒互助会(AA),并在长岛一家结合了咖啡与纹身店的场所完成了首次脱口秀开放麦,开启了完全戒断毒品与酒精长达14年的职业转型。 喜剧的边界与好莱坞名流的空洞本质 (29:25) Dillon坚决捍卫喜剧打破禁忌的特质,援引George Carlin的观点强调喜剧演员的职责是“找到界限并跨越它”。他认为喜剧演员的本质是小丑而非道德领袖,公众将过多的注意力放在了没有实际权力的道德审查者身上。面对近年来播客领域的内容审查与“取消文化”,Dillon认为由于自己长期以荒诞、不按常理出牌的狂言形象示人,使批评者难以从字面意义对其进行定罪,从而形成了独特的抗审查性。 针对好莱坞与播客行业的现状,Dillon批评大型流媒体与传统名流的联合制作策略已经失效,例如Spotify与Meghan Markle等明星的巨额协议。他认为大多数主流名人是由公关团队、经纪机构通过流水线打造的虚假产物,自身毫无真实观点。相比之下,播客的真正吸引力在于未经审查、不设固定剧本的即兴表达。他直言洛杉矶娱乐工业全员充斥着随时被替代的恐惧,从业人员缺乏独立信仰,只能被动等待企业体制的文化指令。 代际矛盾、企业话语被破解与AI洗牌 (39:42) Dillon将婴儿潮一代(Boomers)定性为极度自私的群体。他批评该世代背叛了1960年代的理想主义,将精神追求置换为对房地产、政治权力和物质财富的顽固占有,甚至高龄瘫痪在国会和参议院也不愿让位。针对千禧一代,他认为其政治倾向主要停留在追求虚荣认可的审美层面;而对于Z世代,Dillon认为他们已经彻底看穿了“努力工作就能实现美国梦”的体制谎言。因此,Z世代熟练运用企业人力资源系统的话语体系,借由心理健康、多元身份标签或后疫情时代的远程办公进行“摸鱼”自保,反向利用了体制的规则漏洞。 在技术与经济层面,Dillon认为人工智能正在对文化与创意行业进行剧烈冲击。例如导演Tyler Perry在看到Sora等AI生成工具后叫停了8000万美元的工作室扩建计划。Dillon认为AI能够迅速淘汰那些言之无物、依赖千篇一律促销话术的网络红人,因为其本就缺乏独特的艺术深度。在更宏观的经济图景中,以BlackRock等机构为代表的资本垄断房地产,彻底断送了年轻一代的房屋所有权,使社会走向一种用虚拟社交、AI伴侣替代实体资产与个体自由的企业极权图景。 男性心理健康危机、双重标准与后期生活 (90:26) Dillon抨击了当前文化对男性心理健康困境的冷漠。社会一方面声称关注心理危机,另一方面却常年将年轻男性的挣扎贬抑为“特权阶层的矫情”,导致男性在面对孤立、成瘾与自杀率上升时孤立无援。谈及Andrew Tate等争议人物时,Dillon指出其受众广泛的原因在于迎合了年轻男性对尊重、健身与财务地位的原始渴望;他认为社会对于物质追求存在双重标准,赞美女性成为追求财富的“商业女强人”,却将男性追求财富与地位的言论贴上“有毒”标签。 在个人生活与心理调整方面,母亲在访谈前约六个月去世促使Dillon重新审视创伤。他目睹母亲晚年受精神疾病与抗精神病药物副作用(如震颤与迟发性运动障碍)的折磨,认为其离世是一种解脱。步入30岁后半段,Dillon表示从纯粹的事业野心和个人荣誉中获得的满足感正在递减,转而依靠散步、真实社交、社区互助与超越宗教教条的灵性认知来维持心理健康。他不再将网络反馈作为创作准则,而是以同行认可、自我幽默感及票房作为衡量标准。 Tim Dillon通过荒诞讽刺的视角解构了现代美国的代际冲突、名利机制与劳工文化。尽管他对美国老年政治阶层的认知衰退及不可逆的经济体制表达了彻底的悲观,但他个人通过戒瘾自律、脱离网络虚无感并在舞台上直击禁忌,完成了从创伤到底层生存哲学的构建。

Detailed notes — zh

## Background 该内容由 YouTube 播客频道《The Diary Of A CEO》(主持人为 Steven Bartlett)于 2024 年 4 月 4 日发布。节目围绕知名脱口秀演员兼播客主播蒂姆·狄龙(Tim Dillon)展开深度对谈,内容涵盖他早年深陷成瘾与创伤的成长史、匿名戒酒与喜剧启蒙,以及他对当代不同代际冲突、好莱坞虚伪生态与 AI 科技异化等议题的辛辣审判。 ## TL;DR 蒂姆·狄龙详尽回顾了自己母亲罹患精神分裂症的混乱童年,以及 13 至 25 岁期间过着深柜同性恋且严重滥用毒品的生活,最终在一次午夜快艇事故被甩入白鹭巢穴濒死顿悟后,靠匿名戒酒会(AA)重塑清醒并走上脱口秀舞台的转折历程。他坚持喜剧演员的唯一天职是搞笑而非给出道德标准,并尖锐抨击了传统名流播客的流水线虚伪。蒂姆火力全开解构了当代社会群像:婴儿潮一代是极度利己却最搞笑的“情感恐怖分子”,千禧一代是渴求奖章的虚荣表演者,而 Z 世代则看穿了社会的骗局本质、精明地用心理健康借口反向操纵职场系统。在批判 AI 网红与资本编织的虚拟牢笼之余,狄龙亦深入剖析了男性生存危机,并在尾声收起戏谑,真挚坦陈了对已故母亲与祖母的释怀与愧疚。 ## Atmosphere & style 整场对话洋溢着一种极具狄龙个人辨识度的黑色幽默、虚无讽刺与惊人坦率,主持人敏锐从容的提问与狄龙连珠炮般的即兴暴论构成了绝妙的张力。狄龙在嬉笑怒骂间将残酷的个人堕落史、家庭精神病史与荒诞的时代病理切片揉碎道出,语调在狂放不羁的挑衅与赤裸深沉的内省之间无缝切换。听众宛如置身于一场没有安全网的高速思辨脱口秀,在爆笑解构社会宏大叙事的快感背后,又能真切感受到一份穿越精神深渊后换来的清醒与释然。 ## Bulletin - [01:20:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=4851s) 蒂姆·狄龙指出Z世代已彻底看穿社会是一场庞氏骗局,正熟练利用心理健康假条、多元化标签和远程办公漏洞反向制约管理层,以此化解传统职场剥削。 - [01:25:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=5122s) AI技术正重构娱乐业与现实经济:泰勒·佩里因AI场景生成技术叫停8亿美元影城扩建计划,而千篇一律的带货网红本质上是“长脚的条形码”,终将被AI完全替代。 - [41:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2494s) 狄龙犀利抨击战后婴儿潮一代(Boomers)是史上最自私且拒绝交接权力的群体,但正是他们对地球与子孙后代彻底不在乎的态度,反而造就了荒诞的幽默感。 - [36:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2169s) 好莱坞名流播客的衰落证明流水线包装出的公众人物缺乏真实灵魂,而在超级豪宅与游艇派对的表象背后,极端财富阶层90%的时间都在对抗窒息般的无聊。 ## Key takeaways - [02:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=122s) 极限生存催生即兴喜剧天赋:从13岁到25岁长达十余年的深柜与毒瘾混乱生活,迫使蒂姆通过高速运转大脑、满嘴谎言狡辩来掩盖真相,逆境逼出了其卓越的语言应变本领。 - [03:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=203s) 母亲的精神分裂症摧毁童年安全感:目睹至亲被幻觉与强效精神药物副作用摧残,让蒂姆从小深刻领悟到人类心智的脆弱,并长期笼罩在灾难随时降临的危机感中。 - [16:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=961s) 快艇事故与白鹭巢穴促成戒瘾顿悟:25岁因次贷危机陷入财务绝境且酗酒严重的蒂姆,在深夜快艇撞滩被甩入沼泽鸟巢后猛然惊醒,决心告别毁灭性生活并加入匿名戒酒会(AA)。 - [30:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=1837s) 喜剧演员的核心职责是扮演小丑而非道德领袖:喜剧的唯一首要任务就是好笑,要求毫无实权的喜剧演员像企业CEO或外科医生那样承担社会说教或确保正确是文化错位。 - [36:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2169s) 传统名流播客崩盘印证公关人设的虚伪:好莱坞由法务和经纪人严密审查拼凑出的光鲜明星在麦克风前空洞无物,播客的生命力源自未经滤镜粉饰的真实与自由表达。 - [41:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2494s) 战后婴儿潮一代的极致利己特质:该群体死守郊区豪宅与政坛权力至死不退,褪去嬉皮士理想外衣后沦为拜金主义者,但其对未来的毫不在乎恰好构成了喜剧幽默的前提。 - [43:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2614s) 千禧一代的道德姿态与Z世代的虚无并存:千禧一代因童年情感缺失而极度渴望外界赋予好人奖章,而Z世代虽清醒怀疑体制,却在算法豢养下面临暴力网络化与药物滥用的虚无陷阱。 - [45:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2727s) 美国老人政治暴露政界人才断层:年轻有为的人才更倾向从事金融或科技,使得政治舞台被八旬高龄、思维退化的老迈政客把持,甚至连数字时代的基本现实都无法理解。 - [01:01:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=3711s) 彻底告别受害者思维是自我重塑的起点:拒绝将原生家庭或外部环境作为堕落借口,在面对现实挫败时建立健康的应对机制与真实人际连接,是保持清醒的关键。 - [01:16:33](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=4593s) 好莱坞是一个充斥着“空心人”的虚构概念:置身于高度不安全感的造梦工厂,从业者缺乏独立信仰与原则,沦为神经紧绷、唯命是从且随时等待外界流行指令填充的容器。 - [01:17:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=4660s) “美国梦”被包装成诱导过度劳动的营销骗局:大肆鼓吹无限制成功与物质至上,底层潜台词不过是劝说普通人把自己活活累死,以便让特权阶层安享度假生活。 - [01:20:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=4851s) Z世代反客为主利用体制武器实现反向打劫:年轻人借由心理健康术语、多元化身份标签和远程办公漏洞构建防御,让主管在政治正确威慑下不敢追责,以此对抗职场规训。 - [01:28:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=5307s) 资本剥夺实体所有权并将大众驱赶进数字牢笼:金融巨头垄断物理资产使年轻人永远买不起房车,取而代之的是将人类塞进封闭胶囊仓,用虚拟形象与AI伴侣提供虚假满足感。 - [01:30:26](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=5426s) 男性生存危机与部落主义撕裂催生极端网红:在主流社会动辄将男性标签化为“有毒原罪”且漠视其真实困境的舆论真空下,安德鲁·泰特等鼓吹自律与财富的网红迅速俘获受众。 - [01:33:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=5638s) 当代文化在物质追求议题上存在显著双标:主流舆论大肆赞颂女性商业领袖对财富与权力的追逐,却常常将男性出于赢得尊重的同类野心抨击为有毒肤浅。 - [01:40:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=6021s) 从戏谑梅根到直面内疚的真诚反思:比起调侃梅根·马克尔极致精明的阶级跃升与商业变现,蒂姆内心深处最遗憾的是当年深陷毒瘾堕落时,对提心吊胆的已故祖母造成的心理折磨。 ## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=0s) 节目序幕:对Z世代、AI与不同世代的辛辣锐评 对话在一连串极具蒂姆·狄龙(Tim Dillon)个人风格的讽刺言论中拉开序幕。蒂姆敏锐地指出,现在的 Z 世代(Zoomers)已经彻底看穿了社会的运作本质其实就是一场“骗局”。他们学会了钻系统的漏洞——编造自己根本没有的心理健康问题,连续数天旷工,反过来让管理者胆战心惊。当上司质问“你为什么迟到?”时,他们轻飘飘地回一句“因为我是同性恋”,上司便只能诚惶诚恐地妥协:“好吧,别担心这个了。” 主持人史蒂芬·巴特利特(Steven Bartlett)随后向观众隆重介绍了这位脱口秀界的偶像与即兴大师。蒂姆坦言自己偏爱让观众在黑暗压抑的事物中发笑,因为他在 13 岁到 25 岁期间过着深柜同性恋且深陷可卡因成瘾的生活;尽管最优秀的人格特质往往并非源于美好的遭遇,但苦难确实塑造了他。访谈的前瞻片段还展示了蒂姆对时代的辛辣审判: - **谈人工智能(AI)与网红**:当代社会孕育了地球上最无趣的一群人——那些宛如“长了脚的通用条形码”般的网络网红;蒂姆认为这群人根本没有存在的必要,早该被 AI 版本彻底取代。 - **谈不同世代的特质**:社会正在放弃儿童,让他们全权由算法抚养。婴儿潮一代(Boomers)之所以是最搞笑的一代,是因为幽默的前提是“不在乎”,而他们正是史上最不在乎地球未来、最不在乎子孙后代的自私群体。至于千禧一代(Millennials),则是一群糟糕透顶的自恋者,时刻渴望被拍着肩膀夸奖“政治立场正确、发了对的推文、是个大好人”。 在正片正式展开前,史蒂芬向观众提出了一项小请求:两个月前该频道未订阅观众比例高达 74%,目前已降至 69%,他的目标是降至 50%,希望喜爱节目的听众顺手点击订阅支持。 --- ### [02:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=122s) 即兴天赋的阴暗起源:从13岁到25岁的深柜瘾君子生涯 史蒂芬提到自己长期关注蒂姆的表演,盛赞他是当今最具挑衅性、最卓越且天赋异禀的喜剧演员之一,尤其惊叹于他在舞台上行云流水般的即兴发挥能力。当被问及这种随时随地接招、构思段子的本领究竟从何而来时,蒂姆给出了一个既荒诞又真实的答案:“我从 13 岁到 25 岁一直是个隐瞒性取向的可卡因成瘾者。” 蒂姆解释道,当你在这十余年的青春期与青年期过着如此混乱的双重生活时,你必须具备极强的临场应变能力。在日常生活中,你不可避免地面临各种败露的危机与突击质问,为了自圆其说,你必须精通说谎,并且要像议会阻挠议案一样“滔滔不绝地狡辩与拖延时间”(filibuster)。虽然他从小就擅长言辞,但这段极端的经历逼迫他以常人难以想象的高速运转大脑。他感慨道,人类某些最强大的生存技能往往不是因为美好的原因而诞生的,但无论如何,这份被困境逼出来的敏捷思维最终成就了今天的他。 --- ### [03:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=203s) 精神疾病的“黄金标准”:母亲的精神分裂症与童年的混乱 史蒂芬分享了两周前脱口秀演员吉米·卡尔(Jimmy Carr)坐在同一把椅子上说过的一句名言:“当你遇到一个脱口秀演员,你不要问他们本人是否有抑郁症,你应该问他们的父母中哪一个有抑郁症。”蒂姆对此深表认同,但他笑着补充道,自己的家庭情况要严峻得多:“我的母亲患有精神分裂症。如果精神疾病也有等级的话,她那可是‘黄金标准’,相比之下抑郁症都不算什么了。”至于他的父亲,也只是断断续续处于抑郁状态,母亲的精神分裂症才是笼罩整个家庭的核心挑战。 对于没有接触过这种疾病的人而言,很难想象精神分裂症在一个家庭中是如何显现的。蒂姆回忆道,母亲的症状在他 12、13 岁左右开始集中爆发。最突出的特征是无休止的被害妄想与思维混乱: - **无法理解的宏大叙事**:母亲经常编造庞大复杂且脱离现实的故事,坚称有人在暗中跟踪她。 - **身体疾病与精神疾病的认知落差**:作为孩子,理解感冒发烧等生理疾病非常容易,但面对精神疾病却极其迷茫。因为孩子缺乏生活阅历与对心理崩溃的认知,只能感到巨大的错愕与困惑。 - **刺眼的家庭反差**:当蒂姆去同龄朋友家做客,观察到别人的母亲如何正常交流、别的家庭如何健康互动时,反观自己的家庭,那种巨大的落差感让他感到无比错愕与震颤(jarring)。 蒂姆至今清晰地记得一个标志性时刻:有一天他坐在母亲的车里,母亲神色紧张地对他说,外面有人在跟踪他们,但紧接着又安慰他:“别担心,他们是在保护我。”年幼的蒂姆在车里感受到了双重荒谬——不仅深信有人跟踪,还深信跟踪者是为了暗中保护她。那一刻,他彻底意识到“事情真的严重失控了”,随后甚至无奈地告诉身边的朋友:“我觉得我妈彻底疯了。” --- ### [07:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=423s) 缓慢的告别:药物副作用与安全感的崩塌 成长在充斥着精神分裂症的家庭环境中,对蒂姆的性格与世界观造成了无法磨灭的烙印。最大的影响在于,他对“人类心理健康的脆弱性”有着远超常人的深刻认知。他亲眼目睹一个人如何能因为外界压力或神经崩溃彻底滑向失常,这让他从小就失去了应有的安全感,始终隐约觉得灾难随时可能降临。 蒂姆指出,精神分裂症是一种不可逆的退行性疾病,根本没有彻底治愈的可能,药物治疗只能短暂缓解精神症状,却伴随着极其残酷的生理代价: - **强烈的药物副作用**:为了压制病情,母亲服用了大量极强效的精神类药物,导致严重的锥体外系反应。 - **生理机能的退化**:蒂姆眼睁睁看着母亲的身体出现不受控的肌肉抽搐,坐在椅子上机械地前后不停摇晃。 - **漫长的诀别**:蒂姆将目睹这一切的过程形容为一场“一点一点地与至亲挥手作别的漫长葬礼”,在日复一日的退化中看着深爱的人逐渐被疾病蚕食殆尽。 --- ### [09:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=545s) 父母离异、强迫囤积与爱尔兰天主教式的集体否认 在母亲病情全面爆发的同时,蒂姆的父母也走向了离婚,这一变故由母亲主动发起。蒂姆向医生咨询后认为,母亲本身具有精神分裂症的潜在遗传素质,而离婚带来的巨大精神压力和生活脆弱感,成了诱发其全面发病的催化剂。 在发病初期,母亲身上表现出许多狂热的强迫与强迫性囤积行为: - 她会疯狂地跑遍各个麦当劳餐厅收集全套的迪士尼玩具。 - 大量囤积当年风靡一时的豆豆娃(Beanie Babies)。 - 频繁在街头捡拾路人丢弃的破烂废品运回家中,坚称这些全是价值连城的“古董”,只要经过翻新修整就能大赚一笔。 随着病情演变,母亲的言行越来越倾向于阴谋论。蒂姆在当下的脱口秀表演中常以此调侃:“那些我妈几十年前碎碎念的疯话,现在居然全成了美国国会议员在国会大厦里发表的高见。要是当年有 YouTube,我们把她往镜头前一放,她早就能靠做自媒体发大财了。” 母亲陷入深渊的同时,离异的父亲搬离了住所,年幼的蒂姆不得不独自面对患病的母亲。然而,由于身处一个典型的爱尔兰天主教大家庭(Irish Catholic family),整个家族对精神疾病讳莫如深。亲戚们采取了一种集体的“鸵鸟心态”,用委婉的辞藻粉饰太平,将其归咎为“她性格古怪”或“帕蒂这人挺有趣的、很爱玩”,没有任何人愿意站出来直面真相,承认这个女人已经患上了严重的精神绝症。 ### [10:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=649s) 放养式童年与未处理的心理创伤 蒂姆·狄龙(Tim Dillon)回顾了自己十三岁时的成长状态。作为家里的独生子,他自嘲所有的“乐趣”都由自己一人独揽。在父母婚姻破裂之后,蒂姆并未真正体会过传统意义上的家庭管教。虽然母亲在某些方面十分严厉——她痛恨毒品、酒精和香烟,一旦发现就会大喊大叫陷入疯狂,对蒂姆的举止也充满批评挑剔,绝非放任自流的家长——但整个时代的育儿风格与今天截然不同。那个时代没有智能手机,没有实时 GPS 定位,孩子们可以在郊区的马路上骑几个小时的自行车四处游荡,只要能在门禁前赶回家,并确保眼睛没有因为吸大麻而充血发红即可。 除了世代抚养模式的差异,蒂姆的母亲当时正深陷于严重的个人精神困境,父亲也彻底淡出了生活。这种“自我抚养”的绝对自由,代价是背负着大量无法消化的创伤。蒂姆直言,长年未被处理的创伤必然会寻找宣泄口,而毒品顺理成章地成为了那个出口。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 创伤与毒瘾的早期演变路径 accDescr: 展现蒂姆·狄龙从家庭破裂、缺乏管教到毒品滥用升级的演变过程。 subgraph HomeEnv ["家庭与时代背景"] A["独生子 / 父亲缺席"] B["母亲深陷精神困扰"] C["90年代放养式童年"] end subgraph TraumaEscalation ["创伤与药物依赖升级"] D["大量未处理的心灵创伤"] E["七至八年级接触大麻"] F["可卡因、LSD、K粉滥用"] end HomeEnv --> D D --> E E --> F ``` ### [12:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=752s) 从滑旱冰的邻家女孩到初中毕业典礼上的“磕药”体验 蒂姆吸毒的开端可以追溯到七年级和八年级之间的那个夏天。当时他在镇上结识了一个非常有趣的女孩——一个整天踩着旱冰鞋到处晃荡、吸着大麻的酷女孩。蒂姆将她形容为一种“哥特风的女同性恋原型”,行事风格非常“伦敦范儿”。看着她吸着大麻脚踩旱冰鞋自由穿行,蒂姆心想:“这看起来真是一种不错的生活方式。” 两人一拍即合开始一起吸食大麻,但局势迅速失控升温。在短短一年之内,蒂姆开始涉足可卡因(blow)和迷幻药(acid)。在初中八年级的毕业典礼上,他和那个女孩以及另一个哥们竟然在台上直接吞下了迷幻药(LSD)。随后,狂喜(摇头丸/ecstasy)和 Special K(氯胺酮/K粉)接踵而至。蒂姆毫不避讳地承认那段时期既荒唐又可怕,但同时也“极具乐趣”;尽管毒品带来了灾难性的负面后果,但他坦承自己并不后悔拥有那些荒诞的经历。不过他也强调,自己至今已保持彻底清醒戒断了整整 14 年,绝不建议任何人去触碰毒品,并自嘲道:“我宁愿当年自己是个性感的冲浪手,或者去搞搞体育运动。” - **涉毒时间线**:七年级初次尝试大麻,升八年级暑假用量激增,随后一年内接触可卡因、LSD、摇​​头丸和氯胺酮。 - **标志性事件**:初中八年级毕业典礼上,在全校注视的舞台上服用 LSD。 - **清醒现状**:截至录制节目时,蒂姆已保持无毒品、无酒精状态长达 14 年。 ### [14:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=894s) 黑色幽默的萌芽与长岛豪宅区的巡游 在青春期的混乱生活中,蒂姆的喜剧天赋已经初露锋芒。他自认一直是个滑稽爱搞怪的人,经常为了逗乐周围的人而不择手段。当时学校有一位女老师因长期重度吸烟患肺癌去世,蒂姆就在课堂后排捏着沙哑的嗓子惟妙惟肖地模仿她说话:“我现在人在地狱,全都是因为你们。” 那时他与朋友最常做的事,就是一边抽着大麻,一边开车在长岛的富人区闲逛。蒂姆喜欢对着沿途的豪宅指指点点、大开玩笑。他在此处向听众传授了一个讽刺的生活观察:“这些富豪区从来没有人呆在家里,有钱人永远不在家。”他在车里不断寻找段子和笑料,有时风趣幽默,有时略显烦人,但逗笑他人已然成为他应对生活的本能反应。 ### [16:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=961s) 25岁的人生低谷与白鹭巢穴里的顿悟 蒂姆在 25 岁时迎来了人生的绝对低谷(Rock Bottom)。彼时次贷危机早已重创美国金融业,而蒂姆却在纽约长岛的鲍德温(Baldwin)用次级贷款买了一套房子。他成了一名深陷泥潭的酗酒者,尚未公开同性恋身份,也完全没有涉足单口喜剧。他在长岛一家萧条破败的抵押贷款银行工作,整座工业园区充斥着绝望的气氛。他身旁的同事正面临房产被法拍的惨剧,整个人濒临精神崩溃,却整天打电话四处询价订购锦鲤,幻想着在自家造一个漂亮的锦鲤池;那名同事的妻子在电话里歇斯底里地吼道“我们什么都没了,我们要完蛋了”,而那人却只顾对着话筒追问:“鱼有多大尺寸?我能买几条?” ```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: 蒂姆·狄龙 25 岁低谷走向戒瘾 accDescr: 描述蒂姆从次贷危机工作、荒诞酒肉朋友到坠海并最终痛下决心戒酒的过程。 subgraph Despair ["长岛绝望期 (25岁)"] A["次贷违约买房 / 隐瞒性取向"] B["抵押贷款银行倒闭余波"] C["与酒鬼父亲混迹暴走"] end subgraph BreakingPoint ["破裂点与转折"] D["快艇午夜撞滩入沼泽"] E["掉入白鹭巢穴: 人生失控"] F["痛定思痛决定加入 AA"] end Despair --> BreakingPoint ``` 在那段时期,蒂姆经常与高中好友的父亲混在一起。这位长辈生前是个极具荒诞魅力的毒贩,一生从未正经工作过,全靠妻子赚钱养家。他不仅背负着三次酒后驾驶(DWI)记录,甚至还拿过极其罕见的“水上醉驾”(BWI, Boating While Intoxicated)罪名。蒂姆曾和他经历过两次险象环生的游艇事故。有一次在长岛的一家户外露天酒吧,这位父亲热情宣称要替蒂姆一行人买单,随后向吧台指了指蒂姆等人又指了指自己,双方比了个大拇指致意。一小时后,服务生给蒂姆送来了一张高达 2500 美元的账单——原来这位父亲已经在这家酒吧赊账白喝了两天,他刚才的手势是在告诉调酒师“让这帮年轻人替我结账”。 这名长辈拥有一艘小型的“雪茄快艇”(cigarette boat),常载着蒂姆在长岛的各个水上酒吧间穿梭狂饮。在蒂姆 24 岁那年的一个深夜,两人驾驶快艇在海面上极速飞驰,猛烈撞上了盐沼浅滩,双双被强大的惯性甩出艇外。蒂姆苏醒过来时,发现自己正躺在弗里波特(Freeport)附近海域一片巨大的白鹭(egret)鸟巢里,时间大概是凌晨一点。冰冷的泥泞中,蒂姆抚摸着自己的身体,猛然意识到:“我本可能会瘫痪,甚至可能当场丧命。如果我继续喝下去,绝对不会有好下场。”躺在白鹭窝里的这一刻,成为了他彻底直面酗酒恶疾并决心加入匿名戒酒会(AA)的人生转折点。 - **工作与财务惨状**:25 岁靠次贷在长岛鲍德温置业,面临断供法拍;在几乎瘫痪的贷款机构虚度光阴,妄想成为地产大亨。 - **快艇事故细节**:凌晨一点左右以极高速度撞击沼泽浅滩,蒂姆被抛入白鹭巢穴中苏醒,促成了戒酒的顿悟。 ### [19:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=1180s) 迈向匿名戒酒会(AA)与深渊边缘的酒徒们 从白鹭窝里爬出来后,蒂姆并没有在一夜之间完成救赎,但他真切地意识到自己必须寻求改变。当时他的生活圈子充斥着大批处于“终末期”(end-stage)的严重酗酒者——那些一生都在酒精中泡着、身体和精神早已油尽灯枯的人。 蒂姆经常光顾一家名为“丽莎酒廊”(Lisa's Lounge)的长岛酒吧。这家破旧的酒吧恰好位于他所居住的街区,距离他那栋即将被银行强制法拍的房屋仅几步之遥。置身于这群被酒精吞噬余生的底层酒客之中,蒂姆仿佛看到了自己一眼望得到头的悲惨结局,这促使他终于下定决心,推开了匿名戒酒会的大门。 ### [20:17](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=1217s) 绝望的“老头酒吧”与决定戒酒的人生转折点 蒂姆·狄龙(Tim Dillon)回忆起二十多岁时常去的一家社区酒吧。那家酒吧离他家只有步行距离,最诡异的是,它的名字竟然源于酒吧老板在车祸中被酒驾司机撞死的女儿。酒吧墙上挂着那个女孩的照片,酒客们端起酒杯大喊“敬丽莎(To Lisa)”,然后肆无忌惮地喝得酩酊大醉。那里汇聚了一大群无处可去、沉溺于毒品和酒精的人。酒吧老板曾当着他的面在台球桌上吸食可卡因,并感叹自己开这家酒吧就是为了让那些无依无靠的人在圣诞节也能有个容身之所;当时年仅 24 岁的蒂姆甚至觉得“这人挺善良的”。 但这绝不是一个好玩的酒吧,既不是夜店,也不是年轻人寻欢作乐的场所,而是数十年晚期酗酒者的“人生终点站”。每晚躺在床上,蒂姆看着酒吧里那些沉沦的老人,内心涌起沉重的恐惧:自己还很年轻,却正不可逆转地滑向同一种结局。加上朋友父亲的离世和身边的车祸事故,他猛然意识到自己必须做出抉择。每晚坐在酒吧里,害怕承认真实的自己、害怕去尝试热爱的事业、虚度生命喝个烂醉,这种状态比死亡还要糟糕。他不想以彻底的失败收场,那一刻,他下定决心必须戒毒戒酒。 - 酒吧以老板在车祸中遇难的女儿“丽莎”命名,酒客们常对着墙上的遗照举杯痛饮。 - 蒂姆形容那家店是“晚期酗酒者的收容所”,也是他人生的警钟。 - 推动改变的核心动力:在绝望中依然能够想象出一种更好的生活——不用每天喝得烂醉、不做毫无前途的死薪水工作、能够从事自己喜欢的事业。 --- ### [23:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=1395s) 陪审团谋杀案审判与匿名戒酒会(AA)的残酷功课 戒酒时蒂姆大约 25 岁,彼时他并不清楚未来具体会怎样,但他坚信更好的生活必须建立在两件事之上:“清醒(Sobriety)”与“诚实(Honesty)”。童年时期(6 岁到 12、13 岁左右),他曾是一名颇有前途的儿童演员,演过戏剧,客串过几次《芝麻街》(Sesame Street),甚至在六年级时跟随母亲全美巡演百老汇音乐剧《安妮拿起你的枪》(Annie Get Your Gun)。虽然 13 岁开始吸毒让他放弃了表演,但骨子里对舞台的热爱从未熄灭。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 蒂姆·狄龙的人生转折驱动力 accDescr: 展现谋杀案陪审员经历与AA戒毒戒酒过程如何共同促成生活转变 subgraph External["外部警醒:一级谋杀审判"] A["长岛恶性谋杀案陪审员"] --> B["每日面对死亡与人性的脆弱"] B --> C["警醒:必须彻底改变毁灭性的生活轨迹"] end subgraph Internal["内在重塑:戒酒互助会 (AA)"] D["直面 12 步戒瘾法则"] --> E["打破谎言:强迫自己绝对诚实"] E --> F["忏悔与补过:直面曾伤害过的人"] end C --> G["走向彻底清醒与脱口秀舞台"] F --> G ``` 就在那段时间,蒂姆在纽约长岛被选为一桩轰动一时的“一级谋杀案(Murder One)”的陪审团成员。一名担任警方线人的男子残忍杀害了自己孩子的母亲,由于警方忽视了受害女子申请的多项保护令,事后家属从警局获得了 800 万美元的和解赔偿。原本蒂姆以为陪审员工作只是处理“某人在温蒂汉堡摔倒索赔 10 万美元”之类的琐事,但真正置身审判席,每天直面生死、剥夺与终生监禁的残酷现实,让他彻底受到了震动。 与此同时,他在戒酒互助会(AA)经历了痛苦的精神洗礼。AA 的“十二步戒瘾法”要求极度透明: - **无法伪装的脆弱感**:在互助会的房间里,不能再像喜剧演员一样用笑话或段子做掩护,必须放下所有防备。 - **关于诚实的拷问**:戒掉烟酒毒品容易,但在虚伪的现实世界中做到“绝对诚实”极其困难。老成员告诫他:如果继续习惯性撒谎,就必然会重新复吸。 - **道德清算与登门道歉**:必须列出所有被自己伤害过的人的名单,当面承认偷拿他们的钱买毒品、撒谎和让他们担惊受怕,并寻求宽恕。 --- ### [27:41](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=1661s) 纹身店里的首次开放麦与喜剧中的冒犯边界 满 25 岁时,蒂姆在长岛梅里克(Merrick)的一家兼具纹身店功能的咖啡馆里,登上了他人生的第一次脱口秀开放麦(Open Mic)。现场环境异常嘈杂荒谬,讲得不好冷场时,台下就会传来滋滋作响的纹身机马达声;店里的顾客大多是刚分手的男人,正在把前女友的名字纹身遮盖改造成导弹、爱国图案或“9/11 纪念标志”。面对零星几个喜欢喜剧的本地居民,蒂姆讲完了一整段脱口秀。 这场首秀的反响比预期要好,不仅收获了笑声,更重要的是,蒂姆人生第一次找到了一种“笃定感”。在他以往的人生中,他一直在尝试不同的身份、兜兜转转,从未确信过任何事;但走下那个舞台的瞬间,他无比确信自己属于这里、自己擅长这门艺术,并且愿意为之全力以赴。 谈到如今喜剧界与“政治正确”之间的激烈冲突,蒂姆坦言,冒犯性的禁忌话题永远存在。他引用了传奇脱口秀大师乔治·卡林(George Carlin)的名言:**喜剧演员的职责就是去找到那条底线,然后跨过去**。因为成长背景较为灰暗,蒂姆天生喜欢用幽默解构阴暗、禁忌的事物;但他强调,要触碰敏感题材,就必须把段子打磨得足够好笑,即使永远会有一些缺乏幽默感、习惯字面理解喜剧的人对此感到被冒犯。 ### [30:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=1837s) 喜剧演员的真正职责:搞笑而非“正确” 蒂姆·狄龙(Tim Dillon)谈到当今社会中那些总被笑话激怒的人。有些人只要看到某处有人在逗人发笑,就会莫名愤怒,甚至撰写长篇大论或在电视专题中口诛笔伐。在他看来,公众在过去四年里对这种愤怒倾注了过多关注,如今整个社会已经对此感到筋疲力尽。狄龙坦言,观众完全有权讨厌他、觉得被冒犯或公开反对他的言论,但作为喜剧演员,他无法也没有精力去迎合每一个人的情绪。他指出:“我们只是在讲笑话、找乐子。你可以非常生气,但在我看来,对毫无实权的喜剧演员动这么大肝火,多少有点不可理喻。” 狄龙尖锐地剖析了喜剧演员与权力拥有者的界限。尽管有人主张喜剧演员拥有所谓的“文化软实力”,但他坚决否认这种影响力能与大型企业的 CEO 相提并论。喜剧演员的本质任务绝不是推动社会对话、树立道德标杆或给出正确答案,其首要乃至唯一的核心职责就是“好笑”。在此过程中,观点可能是荒谬的、短视的、愚蠢的,甚至是狭隘偏激的;如果碰巧揭示了某种真相或引发了思考,那也仅仅是搞笑带来的副产品。狄龙打比方说,外科手术医生在台上必须严谨无误、绝不能临场胡来,但喜剧演员本质上就是剧场和播客里的“小丑”。将小丑当成需要对社会负责的权威,正是当下文化紧张与荒诞争议的根源所在。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 喜剧表演与严肃权力的核心差异 accDescr: 对比传统严肃职业如CEO与外科医生,与喜剧演员小丑定位在职责与错误容忍度上的本质不同。 subgraph Power["严肃权力与专业领域"] A["企业 CEO / 外科医生"] --> B["核心职责:确保正确、掌控真实权力"] B --> C["必须严谨负责,绝不能凭感觉胡来"] end subgraph Comedy["喜剧与小丑定位"] D["喜剧演员 / 播客创作者"] --> E["核心职责:纯粹搞笑与娱乐"] E --> F["允许荒唐、短视、冒犯与错误"] F -.-> G["偶然揭示真相(次要副产品)"] end ``` --- ### [33:20](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2000s) 为什么乔·罗根总被抵制,而蒂姆·狄龙却“无法被取消” 针对史蒂文·巴特利特(Steven Bartlett)提到蒂姆曾因乔·罗根(Joe Rogan)屡遭抵制而自己却安然无恙感到“愤愤不平”的趣事,狄龙调侃称自己其实“一直试着被取消”,但大众似乎找不到下手的落脚点。他认为自己根本谈不上所谓“坚不可摧”,而是一个戴着夸张眼镜、满嘴胡话的怪咖。狄龙的播客已经做了八年,每次两小时的录制完全是不受控的即兴发挥,甚至他自己坐下来前都不知道接下来会蹦出什么暴论:“我说的那些荒谬内容可能始于聪慧的构想,而自以为聪明的分析最后往往走向纯粹的荒唐。” 狄龙将自己与乔·罗根的主持风格进行了鲜明对比。罗根运营着全球规模数一数二的播客,会认真阅读嘉宾的书籍、扎实做背景调研,邀请各领域顶尖严肃的人物对话,因而公众会用严肃的审视眼光去对待罗根的每一句话。而狄龙则是典型的“凭直觉开火”,经常在录音中读新闻读到第三段才突然反转态度,大呼“哦糟了,这事真有问题”。与此同时,狄龙深情称赞了罗根对同行的慷慨:罗根是他见过对自身受众和影响力最无私的人,无保留地向喜剧演员、作家、记者敞开平台,提携后辈。两人在节目中的每一次畅聊,不过是私下交流在麦克风前的自然流淌。 - 狄龙认为那些对他大发雷霆的人往往显得滑稽,因为他的言论本就极其夸张、过火且荒诞。 - 即兴录制播客的最大魅力在于没有预设议程(agenda),一旦凡事经过编排,创作过程便会索然无味。 - 罗根作为行业顶流,不仅凭借深厚准备与严肃对谈树立了标杆,更是许多独立创作者走向大众视野的关键引路人。 --- ### [36:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2169s) 传统名流播客的崩盘与“工业造人”流水线 话题转入播客行业的发展演变。狄龙回顾道,最早在播客荒原中拓荒的是亚当·卡罗拉(Adam Carolla)、乔·罗根、马克·马龙(Marc Maron)以及纽约的《Keith and the Girl》等先驱,那时行业尚无资本入场,全凭草根热情。随后 Spotify 等平台携巨资入局,掀起了一场拉拢好莱坞顶级明星入驻的资本实验。然而,各大流媒体平台如今纷纷缩减战线,狄龙直言原因十分残酷:绝大多数好莱坞传统名流“根本没有什么真正想说的话”。 狄龙辛辣地讽刺了名流的诞生机制。他将顶级经纪公司(如他自己签约的 CAA)比作“人体制造实验室”:公关顾问、律师、商务经理和经纪人团团围坐,为艺人量身打造人设,规定哪些过往可以标榜、哪些敏感历史必须掩盖。这样流水线拼凑出来的公众人物,虽然在荧幕前光鲜亮丽,骨子里却极其乏味平庸。狄龙讽刺道,大众总以为好莱坞充斥着邪教狂热与见不得光的阴谋,但现实其实更让人抓狂——那群住着豪宅、赚取暴利的人,本质上只是一群由法务层层审查、毫无灵魂的无聊空壳。 狄龙认为,给这类名流一支麦克风让他们漫谈一小时简直是灾难。他们习惯了只跟圈内名流交往,脑中的每个念头都要经过法务棱镜的层层过滤。他戏谑道,这些好莱坞 A 咖最好的归宿是留在高度管制的红毯上,走出来被问“近况如何”时,只需机械地吐出预设好的两个词——比如“气候变化”,然后走进礼堂领奖,绝不能被允许自由发挥。针对 Spotify 曾向梅根·马克尔(Meghan Markle)等名流一掷千金最终悔之莫及的闹剧,狄龙大开玩笑称这笔钱本该直接给他:“我没办法逼王室娶我,要是我能住进城堡,别人说什么我都绝不搬出来;奥普拉也不会来采访我。但播客的真正灵魂,永远属于未经滤镜粉饰的真实、自由与纯粹的快乐。” --- ### [39:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2382s) 走向技术虚无:从代际冲突到放弃下一代 当巴特利特试图将话题引向更宏大的社会代际议题,询问狄龙如何看待 Z 世代(Gen Z)、千禧一代(Millennials)与婴儿潮一代(Boomers)之间的摩擦与观念撕裂时,狄龙以其标志性的虚无主义冷幽默打断了常规的社会学讨论。 他直言不讳地调侃道,当代社会其实早已对年轻一代彻底撒手不管:“我们已经放弃了孩子。未来不再属于年轻人,未来属于人工智能,未来属于机器人技术。”狄龙指出,当今的舆论场和精英阶层早已不再奢谈“孩子是社会的未来”,公众视线与资本流动全部被人工智能与自动化牢牢占据,传统的代际传承与培育希望在科技狂潮面前已经沦为被遗忘的旧叙事。 ### [40:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2403s) 失控的新一代与算法豢养的暴力 蒂姆·狄伦(Tim Dillon)直言不讳地表示,社会对年轻一代“已经彻底放弃了”。在他眼中,如今的孩子就像是一群“眼神空洞的小怪物”,整天四处乱窜、自相残杀,令人感到巨大的创伤。他打趣道,现在无论是他还是整个社会,对人工智能(AI)的兴奋程度都远超对下一代的关心——毕竟重振旧金山经济的是 AI 而不是孩子们,因此摆在眼前的出路似乎只有“多盖点监狱把他们关起来”。 在蒂姆看来,这一代年轻人是被算法一手养大的。他们吸食芬太尼等各种毒品,在现实中施暴甚至杀人,只为了能录下视频发到 TikTok 上赚取网络流量(clout)。他特别提到了亚利桑那州吉尔伯特市(Gilbert, Arizona)发生的一起真实恶性案件:一群家境优渥的富家白人孩子四处无故殴打路人并拍视频上传,没有任何动机,纯粹出于变态和博取眼球,最终导致一名青少年死亡。蒂姆讽刺道,正因为这群行凶者全都是白人,当地警方整整一年按兵不动,仿佛认为“这不过是小孩子们闹着玩杀个人罢了,这就是成长的一部分”,直到出了人命迫于压力才逮捕他们。蒂姆指出,这种为了网络虚荣心而将极端暴力公之于众的行为已经演变成一种全国性的流行病。 ### [41:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2494s) 战后婴儿潮一代(Boomers):最自私但也最搞笑的群体 蒂姆正在撰写一本关于婴儿潮一代(Boomers)的新书。他坦言自己对这代人“又爱又恨”,将他们形容为一个彻头彻尾的自私群体。这群充满被害妄想的老人死守着他们庞大的郊区豪宅(McMansions)绝不放手,既不肯退休,也不肯搬走,还喜欢在成年子女面前摆架子:“真不敢相信你竟然连这样的房子都买不起。”他们退休后反而换买占地数千平方英尺的更大豪宅,甚至在联邦参议院和众议院里开会开到昏倒、衰竭至死,也绝不肯交出手中的任何权力,蒂姆将其称作“情感恐怖分子”。 蒂姆进一步撕碎了 60 年代嬉皮士的神话。外界常以为那一代人充满进步主义理想,但蒂姆指出他们本质上一直都是自私的瘾君子,从未真正关心过任何崇高的口号,当年只不过是想嗑药并在泥地里打滚;一旦当年的毒品从迷幻药(LSD)变成了金钱,他们瞬间转变为一群极度物质化且毫无灵魂的拜金者。但蒂姆强调,婴儿潮一代也是“有史以来最搞笑的一代人”——因为想要具备幽默感,前提就是对一切都满不在乎。没有任何一代人比婴儿潮一代更不在乎地球的未来或自己的子孙后代。他们每个人都是一座孤岛,永远只为自己活着,蒂姆甚至开玩笑说曾咨询律师能不能通过法律途径强行把他们赶出豪宅并送进精神病院。 ### [43:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2614s) 各代人群像:千禧一代的道德虚荣与 Z 世代的虚无 谈及各世代的差异,蒂姆对千禧一代(Millennials)同样火力全开。他认为千禧一代是一群极度渴望被认可的人,总在叫嚷着“快给我戴上勋章,夸我是个好人”。他们循规蹈矩地上名校、找体面实习、发表政治正确的言论,本质上是因为婴儿潮父母从未真正关心过他们,因而产生了一种巨大的内心空洞,需要全世界来填补。千禧一代的政治诉求大多停留在表面姿态(aesthetic),他们的观点全是向大众迎合讨好的产物;与毫不关心外界的婴儿潮一代相反,千禧一代拼命表现得“善良”,仅仅是为了听到别人夸赞他们善良。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 各代人核心特征对比 accDescr: 展现婴儿潮一代、千禧一代与Z世代在处世态度和行为模式上的核心差异。 subgraph Boomers["婴儿潮一代 (Boomers)"] B1["极致利己 / 情感恐怖分子"] B2["死守豪宅与权力绝不放手"] B3["毫不在乎未来与下一代"] end subgraph Millennials["千禧一代 (Millennials)"] M1["渴望奖章与外界认可"] M2["迎合大众情绪 / 道德姿态化"] M3["试图填补原生家庭情感空洞"] end subgraph Zoomers["Z世代 (Zoomers)"] Z1["独立、怀疑体制、务实自驱"] Z2["算法豢养 / 药物泛滥"] Z3["为 TikTok 流量上演恶性暴力"] end ``` 相比之下,紧随其后的 Z 世代(Zoomers)展现出了一些积极特质:他们更具自驱力,对传统体制抱有深刻的怀疑,思想相对独立且更加清醒愤世。然而其负面表现则是极为荒诞的暴力与虚无——嗑药、抽芬太尼电子烟、商场聚众互殴并上传 TikTok 换取热度。面对这种混乱,蒂姆讽刺地提出“现在应该重启征兵制”,并开玩笑称:“既然我已经上了年纪又发福了,那就让这些年轻人去当兵吧。如果他们只知道嗑芬太尼并在商场互殴发 TikTok,还不如让他们上乌克兰战场,好让波音公司(Boeing)赚点钱。” ### [45:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2727s) 老人政治、政坛人才匮乏与 TikTok 禁令 被问及对未来的看法时,蒂姆直截了当地回答自己完全不乐观,并反问:“我神智很正常,怎么可能乐观得起来?”当主持人提到大选与像乔·拜登(Joe Biden)这样高龄的在任者时,蒂姆直言不讳地指出美国的总统和政客正变得越来越老迈。尽管拜登在国情咨文(State of the Union)演说中靠着“被打了一针提神药物”表现尚可,但他与特朗普都已年事已高,拜登更是处于明显的认知衰退阶段。 蒂姆剖析了背后的深层原因:美国政界已经陷入了彻底的“人才断层”,除非是个疯子,否则聪明有能耐的年轻人根本不想涉足政治。有雄心和才华的年轻人更愿意跑到迈阿密,在豪华游艇上做比特币交易,因为政界环境腐败且充满有毒攻击,媒体会把个人的私生活撕个粉碎。这导致整个国家落入了八十多岁、流着口水、神志不清的老人手里: - 这群高龄政客甚至无法理解现实世界的变化,他们对 TikTok 的唯一了解就是孙辈在缅因州的家庭聚会上边吃龙虾边递过来的手机屏幕。 - 随后这群老人转头就得走进国会辩论并立法决定这些前沿议题。 谈到美国政府当时讨论的 TikTok 禁令,蒂姆半开玩笑地表示自己完全支持封禁,理由是“我在上面根本没什么粉丝”,而且看到别人在上面大把捞钱,自己支持禁令还能气一气这群人;但从严肃层面看,他也承认这确实不是一种健康的文化力量。 ### [48:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2889s) 喜剧事业的目标:为即将退场的婴儿潮一代立传 在谈及未来的喜剧与职业规划时,蒂姆表示自己有非常清晰的目标。除了手头正在撰写的新书之外,他极力想要制作一部关于婴儿潮一代的影视作品(无论是电影还是电视剧)。 蒂姆回顾自己的成长历程,身边的朋友、家人以及上一辈的长辈虽然性格荒唐自私,但充满了令人捧腹的喜剧色彩。考虑到婴儿潮一代已行将就木、即将彻底退出历史舞台,他希望能用镜头和文字将这代人的独特面貌永远定格下来。蒂姆自信地调侃道,虽然许多喜剧演员都想以自己的童年和成长环境为题创作,但“唯独我能把它拍成真正的杰作”,向世人展现那段荒诞又极其生动的真实故事。 ### [49:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2958s) 疗愈创伤与母亲的离世 当主持人询问蒂姆·狄龙(Tim Dillon)是否已经彻底消化并疗愈了童年时期的心理创伤时,蒂姆坦承自己只处理了一部分。他认为人很难在有限的一生中完全解决所有创伤,但这并不妨碍人们持续自我提升,“你总能让自己处于更好的心理状态,而且你也应该朝这个方向努力”。蒂姆提到大约六个月前(前一年的八月),他的母亲离世了。母亲的晚年饱受精神疾病与身体折磨,但这无法掩盖她早期生活的美好。在生下蒂姆之前,父母曾度过了十年的二人世界;年轻时的母亲非常迷人,曾被评为高中校花,酷爱在佛罗里达冲浪和划船。蒂姆用高尔夫做比喻:“前九洞非常精彩,后九洞则相当艰难。” 在母亲去世前不久,蒂姆把她接到了自己位于长岛的家中,召集了表亲、母亲的妹妹等全家人齐聚一堂。尽管当时谁都没想到那会是最后的告别,但大家度过了一段非常温馨的时光。随着年龄增长,蒂姆发现自己越来越倾向于信仰与灵性。他从小在天主教家庭长大,虽然清楚制度化宗教伴随着诸多滥用丑闻和弊端,但他深信人类绝非仅仅由血肉之躯构成,灵魂与灵性世界是真实存在的。看着母亲在与自身大脑和躯体抗争多年后撒手人寰,蒂姆心中除了悲伤,更多的是一种释怀。在他看来,硬要把一个痛苦的灵魂禁锢在不断反噬自我的躯壳里反而是自私的,母亲最终获得了真正的解脱与自由。 - 母亲生平记忆:年轻时外貌出众,获评高中校花(Best Looking),热爱水上运动;晚年长期受病痛与精神折磨。 - 临终前的全家聚会:在蒂姆的长岛住宅中,母亲与姐妹、侄辈及全家亲友度过了最后的温馨时光。 - 灵性与解脱:面对至亲离去,悲伤中夹杂着巨大的释怀(Relief),认为母亲的灵魂终于摆脱了病痛身体的桎梏。 --- ### [53:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=3214s) 心理治疗、家庭与三十多岁的人生转向 谈及是否曾借助专业心理咨询来疗愈自我,蒂姆表示自己过去确实接受过心理治疗,不过目前因为巡演日程繁忙而暂停。他对心理咨询持理性态度,认为找对咨询师确实大有裨益,但也并非万灵药。当主持人探讨蒂姆未来是否打算组建自己的家庭时,蒂姆坦言或许会有这种可能,但他更深刻地感受到自己正在步入人生的分水岭。人在三十多岁尾声时会逐渐意识到,世俗的事业成功所能带来的快乐其实是有上限的。 蒂姆指出,即便未来事业能攀上更高的高峰,个人成就带来的刺激与满足感也会随着年龄增长而钝化。如果一个人正走在健康的成长轨道上,其心智往往会从年轻时“以自我为中心、向外炫耀成就(Me, me, me, look what I've done)”的状态,逐渐转向渴望融入集体、帮助他人并投身于更有社会价值的事物之中。对他而言,见证他人的成就、参与社区建设与利他行为,正变得比单纯追求名利更能带来持久的充实感。 - 心理咨询经验:曾多次接受心理治疗,认为其效果因人而异,“它可能很有用,但也可能毫无帮助”。 - 年龄带来的心理转变:步入三十多岁后期,认识到个人成就对幸福感的边际递减效应。 - 人生价值观迭代:从以自我膨胀为主导的名利追逐,转向寻求社群联结(Community)与利他价值。 --- ### [54:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=3296s) 喜剧人设背后的真实自我 主持人提到,公众通过屏幕观察蒂姆多年,往往只能看到他极具喜感但相对单一片面的一面。蒂姆对此完全认同,并直言所有公众人物本质上都是被大众消费的“产品”,观众很容易默认喜剧演员无时无刻不在段子手状态。然而在镜头之外,他同样是一个有血有肉、需要喘息的普通人。但蒂姆强调,自己在节目中所表达的观点完全是真情实感,不存在人前一套、人后一套的伪善,“如果你跟我出去吃顿晚饭,我在饭桌上聊的跟我播客里讲的一模一样”。 蒂姆解释道,公众之所以觉得不了解他的全貌,是因为他生活中有许多严肃的侧面无法直接转化为喜剧素材。例如他对灵性世界、哲学与现实议题的深入思考,很多时候并不适合直接塞进脱口秀或搞笑播客里。为了保证表演的喜剧纯度,他通常只会将这些话题作为随口一提的插曲,而非核心内容。在艺人的公开表演与私下生活之间,始终存在着一道必须划分的边界。 - 节目观点的真实性:在播客中展现的思想就是其现实认知,从不为了迎合人设立场而假装表态。 - 喜剧之外的个人面向:对灵性、严肃议题有着浓厚兴趣,但受限于娱乐形式的属性,不会将其强行包装为段子。 - 表演者与真实个体的区隔:强调每位娱乐从业者在“舞台产品”与“真实人性”之间都存在双重维度。 --- ### [56:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=3403s) 播客即兴输出的秘诀与拆解媒体叙事 针对即将在伦敦皇家阿尔伯特音乐厅(Royal Albert Hall)举行的专场演出,主持人惊叹于蒂姆在播客长音频或做客《The Joe Rogan Experience》时展现出的惊人即兴能力——制作人哪怕只是临时在屏幕上调出一篇新闻,蒂姆就能瞬间展开一段结构宏大、讽刺辛辣的长篇独白。被问及大脑是如何快速运转时,蒂姆幽默地揭秘:“这其实就是我当年酗酒时养成的习惯。过去我整晚坐在酒吧吧台前夸夸其谈,现在我只是把酒精拿掉,把同样的即兴神侃搬到了话筒前。” 蒂姆认为,自己为听众提供的核心价值在于以独特的视角透视现实世界。主流新闻媒体往往夹带政治说教或商业私货,无论是左翼、右翼、中间派还是纯粹催促消费的企业叙事,都在极力向大众灌输某种既定结论。蒂姆不属于任何赞助商阵营,也不对任何派系效忠,因此他能跳出非黑即白的立场陷阱,去挖掘新闻背后荒诞可笑的人性细节,并揭示更深层的社会运转机制。这种不受束缚、纯粹寻找最有趣切入点的解读过程,正是他的播客能够脱颖而出的根源。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Tim Dillon's Content Processing Method accDescr: Flowchart illustrating how Tim Dillon transforms news into comedic commentary by bypassing ideological biases. subgraph Input["信息输入"] A["媒体报道与即时新闻"] end subgraph Filter["去偏见过滤"] B["过滤主流派系偏见<br/>(左翼 / 右翼 / 商业利益)"] end subgraph Core["喜剧解构与输出"] C["挖掘荒诞性与真实人性"] D["无剧本即兴长篇独白<br/>(类似无酒精酒吧畅谈)"] E["向听众交付深层洞察与幽默"] end A --> B B --> C C --> D D --> E ``` - 即兴输出的渊源:源于早年酗酒时期在酒吧与人侃大山的表达欲,戒酒后将这种本能转化为了职业技能。 - 媒体批评立场:痛陈当今媒体充斥着政治或资本议程(Agenda),缺乏纯粹从人性与常识出发的观察。 - 创作驱动力:不带任何赞助立场与政治同盟,致力于在荒诞的社会现象中提炼出最大化的幽默与本质真相。 --- ### [58:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=3505s) 25岁出柜与在高强度事业中平衡爱情 当话题转向情感生活时,主持人提到蒂姆大约是在25岁左右出柜承认同性恋身份。蒂姆开玩笑调侃道,以今天的社会节奏来看,25岁出柜已经算相当晚了,“毕竟现在统计数据显示很多人两岁就出柜了”。在这句招牌式的辛辣自嘲之后,主持人进一步追问,在如今排满巡演与高负荷工作的职业生涯中,他将爱情置于何种位置。 蒂姆坦言,在追求成功的道路上维系感情是一件极其艰难的事。长期在世界各地奔波巡演,意味着生活节奏的高度破碎。一个人为了在某一方面取得突破所倾注的时间与精力,往往会不可避免地对其私生活造成挤压与伤害。如何在野心勃勃的事业狂飙与建立亲密稳定的情感联结之间找到立足点,始终是他正在面对的现实难题。 - 出柜年龄调侃:25岁左右向身边人出柜,调侃当代年轻群体出柜年龄日益低龄化。 - 亲密关系的现实挑战:密集的全球巡演和职业投入极大侵占了私人生活空间,在事业与恋爱之间保持平衡极为不易。 ### [59:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=3549s) 感情现状与约会观:不找同行与原生家庭投射 蒂姆·狄龙(Tim Dillon)首先探讨了喜剧圈内部的恋爱与婚姻。他观察到很多脱口秀演员倾向于找同行或者圈内人结婚,因为对方能深刻理解这一行的作息、压力和荒诞逻辑;这种结合在很多时候确实奏效,能组建幸福的家庭。然而对他个人而言,他明确表示不希望另一半是喜剧圈的人,而是希望对方完全不沾染这个行业。 被问及目前的感情状态时,蒂姆坦承自己确实在约会,但并没有进入任何一段以结婚成家为导向的严肃长期关系。他笑言自己四处认识人、享受约会的乐趣,并半开玩笑地指出同性恋人群的社交动态略有不同——它不像一场循序渐进通往城堡的“皇家婚礼”。他过去之所以未能发展出走向婚姻和孩子的长期关系,很大程度上是因为早年把全部精力极度聚焦于突破事业难关,努力成为一名合格的脱口秀演员。如今随着事业取得阶段性成果,他开始更愿意敞开内心,去修补和拓展此前被忽视的生活维度。 主持人和蒂姆随即深入探讨了原生家庭对恋爱观的隐秘塑造。主持人提到,人们最早对“爱”的模型认知往往来自对父母相处模式的观察。蒂姆对此深表赞同,感叹道“噢,太对了”;他反思自己过去总拿“专注事业”当作逃避亲密关系的借口,本质上是一种自私的体现。尽管追求成功确实需要一定的专注与自私,但他本可以挤出更多时间去维系感情。随着人生阅历的增长,蒂姆意识到虽然豪车、名牌等物质诱惑十分耀眼,但人内心深处真正渴望的,除了逗人发笑带来的成就感之外,更是被人欣赏、关爱和悉心照料的情感连接。 --- ### [01:01:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=3711s) 自我认可与摆脱“受害者思维” 当主持人问他最爱自己哪一点时,蒂姆毫不犹豫地指出是自己“不断行动并持续推进的能力”,以及从不找借口、迅速消化拒绝并继续前行的韧性。他打趣道,自己并不像 YouTube 上的励志博主那样每天打卡健身,但他具备一种骨子里的倔强:绝不轻易认输,绝不听凭别人宣判“这事成不了”,而是死磕到底,直到按照自己的规则做成这件事情。 蒂姆回忆起自己的成长背景,指出如果任由内心脆弱阴暗的一面发展,完全存在另一个版本的自己——一个流落街头、吸毒至死、把一切不幸都甩锅给别人的失败者。他反思道,虽然自己的母亲患有精神疾病,父亲或许陪伴不足,但他们本质上都是好人,且始终支持着他。涉足毒品纯粹是他个人的错误选择,现实中很多人成长于真正残酷虐待的环境中,却依旧取得了巨大的成功,这些人都深深激励着他。 他坦诚自己早年曾深陷“受害者思维”多年:因为得不到想要的东西就破罐子破摔,沉溺于毒品、挥霍金钱、走向破产并怨天尤人。如今他感到非常庆幸自己能够彻底告别那个“糟糕的旧版本”。虽然现在的自己绝非完人,戒毒并步入正常生活后也依然要面对一连串全新的现实问题,但彻底甩掉那个病态依赖借口的自我,是他最自豪的蜕变。 --- ### [01:03:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=3836s) 戒毒后的生活修行与心理调节机制 谈及当下正在努力改善的生活细节,蒂姆表示这涵盖了方方面面:吃得更健康、睡得更规律、花更多时间陪伴他人,以及在约会时学会真正倾听对方说话。他戏谑地吐槽道,即便约会对象聊起自己的市场营销专业时极其乏味,自己也努力把他们看作“上帝的孩子”去耐心地倾听。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 走出恶性循环的心理与生活重塑流程 accDescr: 展示从以往破坏性行为模式向清醒后健康生活方式的转变路径 subgraph Trap["过去的恶性循环"] A["沉溺毒品与酒精"] --> B["病态说谎与逃避"] B --> C["自我毁灭与怨天尤人"] end subgraph Transformation["清醒后的起点"] D["彻底戒除成瘾物质"] --> E["直面现实与接受平庸日常"] end subgraph Maintenance["健康的应对机制"] F["改善饮食与规律睡眠"] G["倾听他人与建立真实连接"] H["远离屏幕与多走入自然"] end Trap -.->|"告别旧我"| Transformation Transformation --> Maintenance ``` 在蒂姆看来,戒瘾绝不是修行的终点,而是人真正开始学习如何为人处事的起点: - **接受挫败常态**:生活中依然会频繁经历各种挫折与失败,但底线是不再重蹈覆辙,绝不退回到酗酒、吸毒、病态说谎和自我毁灭的状态中。 - **正视心理健康**:作为一名脱口秀演员,他的心理状态不可能“完美健康”,否则他可能根本不会选择吃这碗饭;但整体而言正处于良好且受控的状态。 - **积极的应对机制**:通过与真实的人交流、长途散步、帮助他人以及拓展精神追求来稳定心神。 --- ### [01:05:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=3934s) 远离数字毒瘾与马斯克收购 Twitter 的评价 蒂姆进一步严厉剖析了互联网对当代人精神世界的侵蚀。他指出,现代人最大的精神内耗来源就是花费过多时间停留在网络空间,脱离现实人群,深陷于不可控事件的焦虑之中。与其在 TikTok 上刷各种暴力凶案的碎片信息,不如关掉手机坐在海滩上发呆或散步。尽管由于工作需要,他必须在社交媒体上寻找喜剧素材,但他正有意识地大幅减少上网时间。他强调,对于在非网络时代成长起来的一代人而言,把网络仅仅当作职场工具、把时间留给读书与实体探索,才是对抗焦虑的良方;无节制的刷屏纯粹是“制造不幸的配方”。 蒂姆将矛头直指各大科技巨头。他讽刺道,硅谷公司在青少年心理健康恶化、抑郁甚至自杀率飙升的问题上集体装聋作哑,嘴脸如同宣称“我们新推出的自杀应用与青少年自杀激增毫无因果关系,纯属娱乐性质”一样荒谬。他强调,毒性极强的网络算法正在对年轻一代造成前所未有的心理创伤,而最立竿见影的解药恰恰是回归最质朴的人际肉身互动。 最后,话题转向埃隆·马斯克(Elon Musk)对 Twitter(现 X)的收购。蒂姆认为这一收购总体上是件好事。他指出,在被收购之前,Twitter 已经沦为美国社会审查制度的一个令人遗憾的典型代表。尽管 Twitter 自身从来都不是一个包容、健康的温床,其底色始终是一个充斥着癫狂争吵的舆论角斗场,但打破原有的严苛言论压制、提供一个相对更少审查与自由表达的发声渠道,在当下依然具有积极意义。 ### [01:08:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=4091s) 社交媒体的喧嚣与创作心境:马斯克收购 Twitter 与抽离反馈 谈及埃隆·马斯克(Elon Musk)对 Twitter(现 X)的收购,蒂姆·狄龙(Tim Dillon)持肯定态度。他认为人们能够畅所欲言是一件好事,但平台归根结底只是一个工具,喜欢的人尽情去用,而他自己则随着心境调整投入的精力。比起在社交网络上零敲碎打地宣泄碎片化观点,他现在更倾向于将深刻或荒诞的想法保留给自己的播客节目,并在长篇叙述中将其充分展开与打磨。 针对是否会受到负面反馈困扰的问题,蒂姆坦言“所有人都会介意”,但他选择主动限制自己接收外界评价的频率。在他看来,反馈是一把双刃剑:如果创作者一味迎合观众的喜好,根据“多做这个、别做那个”的指点来调整自己,最终只会摧毁创作最初的纯粹与美感。观众有权产生任何反应,但创作者绝不能让这些反应反过来重塑自己的心智。衡量内容好坏的标准,应当回归到创作者自身的直觉——它是否让你感到愉悦?是否真的引人发笑?以及你所信任的朋友是否认可。尽管互联网与脱口秀行业充斥着票房和点赞等硬性数据指标,但过度沉溺于指标只会让人迷失。 --- ### [01:09:47](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=4187s) 英国巡演与单口喜剧内核:从皇家阿尔伯特音乐厅到极具争议的现实议题 谈到即将在英国展开的巡演,主持人对蒂姆将登上标志性的皇家阿尔伯特音乐厅(Royal Albert Hall,4月7日演出)以及曼彻斯特和利物浦等站充满期待。蒂姆开玩笑调侃自己在芬兰赫尔辛基的票房(“只有19个人买了票”),并分享了一位芬兰女观众发来的质朴留言:“这里既不是伦敦也不是汉普顿,但这就是我们拥有的一切,我会带你好好看看。”这种脚踏实地的坦率令他深感触动。 关于这套巡演专场的内容走向,蒂姆指出观众可以期待更深沉、更辛辣的黑色幽默风格: - **年度荒谬事件复盘**:以极具讽刺意味的视角串联过去一年在美英两国发酵的文化与社会趋势。 - **刺痛现实的社会议题**:深入探讨社交媒体对儿童心智与心理健康的侵蚀、屡见不鲜的“取消文化”(Cancel Culture)。 - **城市溃败与药物危机**:将美国大都市普遍面临的无家可归潮(Homelessness)与毒品泛滥现象搬上舞台,以尖锐的讽刺将其荒诞本质剖析得淋漓尽致。 --- ### [01:11:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=4290s) 顶层财富的空虚与无聊:海德公园一号的冰冷隐喻 蒂姆透露自己曾萌生过在伦敦置业的念头,尤其是位于骑士桥(Knightsbridge)的全球顶豪公寓“海德公园一号”(One Hyde Park)。吸引他的并非豪宅的奢靡,而是它所折射出的社会心理学切片——整座大楼日常几乎空无一人,偶尔能看见年轻的沙特富豪开着布加迪呼啸而过,硕大的楼体仅有稀稀落落的一两盏灯亮起。在蒂姆眼中,这栋建筑完美象征了“极端物质占有背后的极致冰冷与空洞”。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 极端财富与空虚心理映射 accDescr: 揭示超级富豪阶层表面奢靡与背后窒息般无聊的心理机制。 subgraph WealthSpectacle["顶层财富的表象"] A["海德公园一号 / 骑士桥豪宅"] --> B["游艇、豪车与荒唐派对"] end subgraph InternalVoid["精神内核与心理状态"] B --> C["90% 时间对抗极度窒息的无聊"] C --> D["缺乏真正激情与现实连接"] end subgraph TimObserver["旁观者的视角"] D --> E["着迷于空洞的荒谬感"] E --> F["对被拒绝上瘾:永远被排斥在圈外"] end ``` 蒂姆剖析道,大众往往只看到超级富豪阶层纵欲狂欢、游艇派对乃至爱泼斯坦式的罪恶阴谋(他调侃这或许只占他们生活的10%),却忽略了其余90%时间里笼罩他们的平庸与虚无。那是一种毫无激情的、窒息般的极端无聊。自嘲“从六岁试镜起就对被拒绝上瘾”的蒂姆表示,他绝不想真正融入那个圈子,站在圈外冷眼旁观这种荒谬与枯燥本身就是一种巨大的戏剧乐趣。 --- ### [01:13:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=4405s) 都柏林的酒后乱局与城市治理:迪拜为何正在胜出? 对比伦敦的疏离,英格兰北部以及苏格兰、爱尔兰的市井活力让蒂姆印象深刻。回忆起在都柏林的演出经历,蒂姆讲述了一场令人啼笑皆非的闹剧:第一场演出极为成功,而深夜的第二场观众全员酩酊大醉,一名醉酒女性突然在台下尖叫“去他妈的天主教徒”,随即引发现场群殴。 蒂姆在台上直接对观众破口大骂:“这就是为什么迪拜在赢,这就是为什么中国在赢!看看你们这群人,你们长得一模一样,全是土豆,却在冲着稍微有点不一样的土豆咆哮,这太蠢了!迪拜正在天际线上建造摩天大楼,而你们却在这里像失败者一样互殴。”这种充满自我讽刺的当头棒喝反而赢得了全场喝彩,因为台下观众心里清楚这就是他们真实的文化底色。 由这场闹剧延伸至现代文明的发展格局,蒂姆与主持人探讨了迪拜的崛起与西方大都市的衰退: - **秩序与清洁的渴求**:当代大众对整洁、安全与井然有序的环境产生前所未有的向往,这也是迪拜备受追捧的心理根源。 - **欧美城市的治理溃败**:与中东新城的快速建设相比,以加州为代表的美国传统都市正在陷入治安失序、市容混乱与治理失灵的泥潭。 --- ### [01:15:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=4503s) 好莱坞的幻象破灭:洛杉矶——等待指令的分形幽灵 谈及加利福尼亚的现状,主持人提到英国人透过屏幕往往将加州想象为一个美丽而干净的天堂。蒂姆毫不客气地戳破了这个神话,痛斥这全都是“好莱坞兜售的谎言”。他坦言加州的自然风光固然有令人屏息的美丽,但在洛杉矶生活的人群却早已异化。 蒂姆用极其荒诞且具哲学意味的比喻形容洛杉矶的居民:他们本质上是虚空的、不复存在的“分形”(Fractals)与“幻影”。走在洛杉矶街头,你偶遇的俊男靓女看似真实,但心智却游离在现实世界之外,宛如没有实质内涵的空壳。在这个贫富两极极端分化、仅有一线之隔的造梦之城里,绝大多数人的心理常态是“绝望地等待指令”——从派拉蒙影业身陷危机的首席执行官,到底层拼命讨好各方、试图在好莱坞即兴喜剧俱乐部(Hollywood Improv)谋求一个登台机会的餐厅勤杂工,所有人都悬在随时可能落下的屠刀之下,被不安全感与虚无吞噬。 ### [01:16:33](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=4593s) 好莱坞的空洞傀儡:等待指令的“空心人” 在好莱坞这个行业小镇里,每个人在潜意识中都明白自己是随时可以被替换的耗材。正因这种根深蒂固的不安全感,所有人都在被动地等待外界指令,没有人敢率先采取行动,大家都在等别人先探明底线、等群体形成共识后才敢跟风。蒂姆·迪伦一针见血地指出,这里的人没有任何真正的个人信仰。他们住在比弗利山庄或马里布的豪宅里,整天呆滞地坐着,宛如雕塑般僵硬。私人健身教练上门带他们练完一身汗,他们又走回昂贵的“小棚屋”里继续发呆,神经紧绷地守着电话和电子邮件,全神贯注地等待外界告诉他们今天该信奉什么、该追捧谁、当下的流行现实又变成了什么。 这种极端的盲从让这里的文化风向显得荒诞不经:“今天流行大码女性?太棒了,赶紧找来一帮连着呼吸机的胖女人登场!明天风向又变回只看俊男美女?那就把好看的人全拉过来!”在蒂姆看来,好莱坞圈子里的人没有原则与灵魂,本质上全是一具具等待被指令填充的空壳与容器。不过他话锋一转,带着标志性的黑色幽默补了一句:“但话说回来,这里风景确实漂亮,墨西哥卷饼也挺好吃的。”随后,当史蒂芬·巴特利特提到英国人眼中光鲜亮丽的加州与纽约时,蒂姆毫不掩饰自己对纽约的偏爱,直言纽约才是一座“真正的城市”,而好莱坞不过是“一个并不怎么高明的虚构概念”。 --- ### [01:17:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=4660s) 美国梦的包装谎言:所谓的无限可能,不过是“累死拉倒” 史蒂芬提到,在英国人的普遍印象中,美国梦代表着无尽的可能性——任何人来到这里都能凭借努力出人头地、成为自己想成为的任何人。对此,蒂姆讽刺道:“那是我们在营销方面做得极好。”他指出,“你能成为任何你想成为的人”是一句极具误导性的空头口号。当你对一个八岁的孩子说“你长大后能当美国总统”时,你隐瞒了通往那个权力宝座所必须付出的巨大代价与黑暗妥协。这就像骗一个小孩说他能变成超级英雄一样,忽略了现实中所有苛刻的前提条件。 蒂姆强调,把这种口号无脑灌输给大众是极不负责任的做法。它完全脱离了现实,漠视了每个个体先天的能力局限、工作负荷承受力以及个人真正愿意付出的劳动量。这根本不是什么人生哲学,充其量只是一句印在车牌、文化衫或汽车保险杠上的劣质广告词。在美国,当整个社会鼓吹“你可以成为任何人”时,底层潜台词其实是“你可以赚无穷无尽的钱”;整个体制在推销一种病态的价值观:认为通往幸福的唯一途径就是不断向上爬、疯狂掠夺资源、成为老板与企业家、建立自己的商业帝国。蒂姆冷酷地揭露道,统治阶层散播这种幻梦,绝不是为了鼓励民众提出独立见解去挑战现有体制,而是为了让普通人拼命工作到死:“这句话真正的翻译是——‘去把自己活活累死吧,我好开着我的游艇出海度假’。” --- ### [01:20:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=4851s) Z世代看穿了国家骗局:用体制的武器反向“打劫” 针对当下年轻一代在 TikTok 上展现的生活切片——喝着摩卡巧克力星冰乐、做着瑜伽、在大厂摸鱼、悄然退职(quiet quitting),蒂姆不仅没有批评,反而给出了极具颠覆性的盛赞。他认为,Z世代最了不起的地方在于,他们终于看穿了这个国家本质上就是一场巨大的庞氏骗局。而既然游戏规则是一场骗局,最聪明的应对策略就是像骗子一样去反客为主。 蒂姆细致地梳理了年轻一代精明且充满战术性的职场生存法则: - **无中生有制造心理健康借口**:捏造自己根本没有的焦虑症或精神障碍,名正言顺地连续请假数日。 - **降维威慑上级主管**:利用高层对政治正确、HR 投诉以及法律纠纷的恐惧,强迫主管对自己粗制滥造、极其平庸的工作成果予以“尊重”和包容。 - **灵活打出“多元化身份底牌”**:一旦有领导试图对其工作表现进行绩效追责,年轻人就会立刻祭出种族、性取向或弱势群体身份,把对方吓得噤若寒蝉。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Gen Z Exploiting Corporate System accDescr: Flowchart illustrating how Gen Z leverages diversity cards and corporate HR scripts to quiet quit and resist exploitation. subgraph Trap["传统企业剥削循环"] A["传统打工人"] -->|"被灌输美国梦"| B["每周拼命加班 40+ 小时"] B -->|"换取虚无晋升"| C["身心俱疲 / 随时被裁"] end subgraph Loophole["Z世代的反向操作"] D["洞悉体制本质: 整个国家就是一场骗局"] D --> E["居家办公 / 假装工作 / 悄然退职"] E --> F{"管理层试图追责?"} F -->|"是"| G["祭出多元化标签与心理健康话术<br/>'我焦虑 / 你侵犯了我的空间 / 我是同志'"] G --> H["主管噤若寒蝉,被迫接受低质产出"] end ``` 这种现象在疫情后普及的远程办公(Remote Working)浪潮中愈发不可收拾。蒂姆幽默地模拟了当代年轻员工在职场中的经典交锋:当主管质问“你今天为什么迟到”时,年轻员工可以理直气壮地回怼“因为我是同性恋,少管闲事”;或者搬出一整套精心包装的心理学术语防御系统:“你靠得太近,侵犯了我的物理空间”、“你说话的音量太大造成了我的创伤焦虑”、“这份报告还没做完,但我现在需要安静的时间来平复心情”。 蒂姆大笑着表示,这种把社会彻底搞混乱的招数堪称艺术。老一辈或许觉得只要厉声呵斥“闭嘴干活,不干就滚”就能解决问题,但现实中根本没有管理层敢冒这个风险。年轻人只是捡起了体制亲手递给他们的武器,并将其运用到了极致。在蒂姆看来,为了个人利益去最大限度地利用规则漏洞,“这恰恰是骨子里最纯正、最地道的美国精神”。 --- ### [01:24:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=5053s) 赞助商插播与 AI 颠覆浪潮的铺垫 随着对职场生态与年轻一代生存现状的剖析告一段落,节目插播了由主持人史蒂芬代言并投资的肠道健康检测品牌 Zoe 的赞助广告。史蒂芬分享了该品牌在科学研究上的重大突破:其尖端肠道测试已从原先能够分析的 30 种肠道菌群,大幅拓展到了 100 种菌群种类,为观众提供了专属折扣信息。 广告结束后,史蒂芬重新将话题拉回时代脉搏。他提到,自己曾采访过大量站在行业金字塔顶尖的顶尖人工智能(AI)专家,但他格外好奇蒂姆对未来 AI 发展的独特洞察。因为 AI 技术的突飞猛进与即将到来的自动化海啸,首当其冲要剧烈颠覆的,正是这群自以为看穿了职场把戏的年轻一代,以及整个社会的固有结构。 ### [01:25:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=5122s) AI对影视娱乐产业的颠覆与末日感 对话切入到超级智能(super intelligence)与人工智能(AI)的话题。主持人指出,各行各业似乎都面临被机器人或 AI 取代的风险。Tim Dillon 直言,AI 正在对其身处的娱乐行业带来巨大震动。虽然脱口秀喜剧演员可能运气稍好、不会那么快被替代,但 AI 对编剧(writing)和表演(acting)领域的冲击已迫在眉睫。他举了一个现实中的典型例子:导演兼制片人泰勒·佩里(Tyler Perry)在见识到某款能够直接生成逼真拍摄场景的新型 AI 工具后,果断叫停了一项耗资 8 亿美元的影城扩建计划。Tim Dillon 解释道,当 AI 能够直接无中生有地生成外景时,剧组为什么还要大费周章地进行实地拍摄?紧接着,布景师(set dressers)、道具公司(prop companies)等一整个产业链条都将面临被彻底边缘化甚至沦为多余的危机。 因此在业内人士眼中,AI 的降临无异于一场“末日级事件”(apocalyptic event)。很多长期依赖传统影视制作流程维生的工作岗位,在 AI 带来的根本性重构之下,将直接不复存在。 - 泰勒·佩里(Tyler Perry)因目睹 AI 场景生成的突破,直接取消了价值 8 亿美元的工作室扩建计划。 - 影视行业不仅编剧和演员受影响,布景师、道具商等底层线下制作团队都面临被取代的风险。 --- ### [01:26:28](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=5188s) “行走的条形码”:AI网红与虚拟孤独 随后,Tim Dillon 将火力转向了互联网网红文化。他辛辣地讽刺道,美国社会孕育出了地球上最有趣的一批人,但同时也培育出了一群“最无趣、最千篇一律的货色”(some of the least interesting people)。这类极其平庸的人在网上赚取数以百万计的美元,其核心业务不过是推销商品。他们每天的视频套路如出一辙:“有人问我的护肤流程是什么,所以我决定跟大家分享一下优惠码,因为好多人跑来跟我说‘你的皮肤看起来真的在发光’……”Tim Dillon 刻薄地指出,这帮人本质上连真实人类都算不上,完全就是“长了脚的通用条形码”(generic barcodes with feet)和“行走的优惠码”(promo codes),用像素化、AI 生成的虚拟人来取代他们根本毫无违和感,观众甚至完全察觉不到差别。 相比之下,如果试图用 AI 取代罗伯特·德尼罗(Robert De Niro)或蒂娜·特纳(Tina Turner)这样的传奇艺术家,人们会觉得不可思议;但换成这帮流水线式的促销网红,替换成 AI 简直是天经地义,“就让它发生吧”(Let it happen)。 主持人补充提到,现在的 AI 网红发展迅猛,有的账号已经拥有几十万甚至数百万粉丝(如知名的虚拟网红 Lil Miquela 等),最诡异的是评论区里那些真心实意给 AI 发私信求爱的男人。Tim Dillon 讽刺地调侃道:“那都是些‘非常健康’的男人。”他半开玩笑地说,现代很多人在现实人际关系中受挫,甚至可能真需要和 AI 性爱机器人约会,搞不好 AI 才是唯一能够尊重他个人自主权、真正尊重他的对象,自己对此完全持开放态度。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 从真实人类到数字异化的演进流程 accDescr: 展示了从传统艺术到空洞网红,再到资本全面剥夺现实资产并用数字虚拟替代的逻辑演进。 subgraph Culture["从艺术价值到商业虚无"] A["传统传奇艺术家<br/>(罗伯特·德尼罗 / 蒂娜·特纳)"] B["空洞的现实带货网红<br/>('长脚的条形码 / 优惠码')"] C["AI虚拟网红<br/>(像素化替代品,收割孤独经济)"] A -.难被替代.-> B B ==无缝替换==> C end subgraph Dispossession["物质剥夺与数字囚笼"] D["资产垄断与现实剥夺<br/>(BlackRock等机构垄断住房,剥夺所有权)"] E["虚拟代偿与全面异化<br/>(住在数字胶囊仓,与AI恋爱,拥有虚假话语权)"] C --> D D --> E end ``` --- ### [01:28:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=5307s) 物质剥夺的数字黑客帝国:资本编织的美丽新世界 紧接着,Tim Dillon 展开了一段充满黑色幽默却极度深刻的反乌托邦社会批判。他认为人类这个物种的时代“已经到头了”(humans are over)。社会的腐朽显而易见,最明显的标志就是对下一代的冷漠:过去政客们整天念叨儿童与家庭,而如今儿童只在文化战争中被当作攻城槌(battering ram)使用——只有在涉及洗手间和性别议题时才会被拉出来炒作,根本没人真正在意孩子们是否受到良好教育、未来能否拥有财产。 他指出,以黑石集团(BlackRock)为代表的大型金融垄断机构正在买下一切,将普通人彻底隔绝在实体资产所有权之外。资本实际上在向年轻人灌输一种逻辑:“互联网现在就是你的家了。” - 你永远买不起属于自己的房子,买不起车,也存不下任何钱; - 但你可以在网络世界里拥有一个专属于你的虚拟形象(avatar),可以和一个 AI 谈恋爱; - 地球上最适宜居住的黄金地段将被超级富豪殖民瓜分,其余地区则将饱受气候变暖的摧残; - 曾经热爱的城市街道被成群的吸毒者占领,治安崩溃让人不敢出门,而系统顺水推舟地告诉你:“不用出门也挺好的。” 资本剥夺了现实世界中的所有物理维度,把你的记忆、位置、甚至思维方式全部数字化并占为己有。取而代之的是,它给你一间紧闭房门的小胶囊仓,并慷慨地分配给你一个 AI 网红,让你在键盘上就各种热点发表毫无意义的评论,产生一种自己依然拥有价值与意义的幻觉。最后,Tim Dillon 用他标志性的极度讽刺语气反问:“所以,我对未来乐观吗?答案是——当然乐观(yes)。” --- ### [01:30:26](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=5426s) 男性困境、政治极化与部落主义的恶性循环 主持人顺势将话题引向当前男性的生存危机:数据表明当代男性的孤独感达到了前所未有的程度,自杀率攀升,深陷色情成瘾等各类泥潭;与此同时,各类兜售速成答案的“男性气概网红”(masculine influencers)借机崛起,指责年轻人都是失败者,却获得了巨大的受众市场。 Tim Dillon 深入剖析了这一现象的根源。他认为,核心问题在于当今社会热衷于将人群粗暴地切割成不同的利益集团,并挑动它们相互倾轧——无论是在男女之间、不同种族之间,还是不同宗教之间。这种意识形态根本不是为了建设,而纯粹是为了撕裂和摧毁(tearing something apart)。 他强调,当代年轻男孩在成长过程中面临着极其恶劣的舆论环境: 1. **污名化与道德负罪**:一个小男孩走进校园,被不断灌输他是“有毒的”(toxic),他与生俱来就带有种族主义或性别歧视的原罪。 2. **话语权剥夺与双重标准**:社会总有一批人以“历史上所有总统都是男人、男性在世界上占尽便宜”为由,对年轻男性的真实痛苦视若无睹。每当男人试图倾诉挑战时,得到的往往是冷酷的呵斥:“你们已经占尽便宜了,闭嘴吧,没人想听你抱怨。”Tim Dillon 尖锐地指出,说这种风凉话的,恰恰是平日里最喜欢把“心理健康至关重要”挂在嘴边的同一批虚伪之人。 3. **现实生存空间的挤压**:在当下这个阶层固化的时代,每个人想要在世界上脱颖而出、为自己开辟一片立足之地都变得极其艰难。 最后,Tim Dillon 呼吁停止这种歇斯底里的部落主义(rampant tribalism)——不要再把人简单打上“男性、女性、异性恋、同性恋、白人、黑人、原住民”的标签,而是应当回归以“核心价值观”为纽带的联结。世界本就多元,加州马里布(Malibu)居民的想法不可能跟路易斯安那州(Louisiana)的老百姓一样,试图强迫所有人统一思想是世界上最徒劳的事。真正的出路是尊重彼此差异,构建一个允许不同人群共同繁荣的环境。正是在主流社会对男性困境闭口不谈、极度压抑的真空之下,安德鲁·泰特(Andrew Tate)才凭借豪车、肌肉和极端言论,迅速填补了这一空白,成为了这群失落男性的精神图腾。 ### [01:33:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=5638s) 安德鲁·泰特的吸引力与对财富追求的双重标准 谈到备受争议的网络红人安德鲁·泰特(Andrew Tate)时,蒂姆·狄龙(Tim Dillon)分享了自己与他的接触经历。泰特曾做客蒂姆的播客节目,蒂姆直言对方待人非常客气友善,尽管他经常会发表一些荒诞不经的言论,“就像所有人一样,我也常说疯话,他显然不应该去竞选参议员”。但蒂姆指出,泰特之所以能在年轻男性群体中产生如此强烈的呼应,是因为他触及了当代男性内心深处对“被尊重”的极度渴求。男性渴望通过自己的行动赢得社会地位与尊严,而泰特宣扬的许多理念——努力赚钱、塑造强健体魄、提升男性地位——恰恰迎合了这种本能。即便这些言论往往带有负面联想或可能引发意料之外的后果,年轻人想要拥有金钱和地位的心理完全是情理之中的。 蒂姆犀利地揭示了当代社会在这一议题上的双重标准。泰特告诉男人“搞好你的财务状况,因为在这个世界上拥有金钱且不依赖他人才能赢得尊重”,并直言“这会让你吸引女人”,结果舆论铺天盖地地抨击他,视之为有毒且荒谬的坏建议。然而在天平的另一端,当主流文化在阿斯彭思想节(Aspen Ideas Conference)等精英场合大肆宣扬女性高管与“女强人”(Girlboss)文化时,人们却对金钱与物质成功毫不吝啬赞美之词。“如果我办一场女性领袖大会,站上台说‘这些女性非常富有,你们有钱、有地位,看看你们做到的成就’,全场都会起立鼓掌欢呼。”蒂姆指出,社会一方面不断规训年轻女性将事业和物质积累视为人生最重要的追求,另一方面却将男性对同类物质与地位的追求极度妖魔化,这种双标现象极为滑稽。 - **尊重的诉求**:很多男性支持泰特并非认同其全部言论,而是因为他指明了一条通过财富与自律赢回世俗尊重的路径。 - **文化的割裂**:女性追求物质财富和商业掌控权被包装为时代进步与女权胜利,而男性追求同样的世俗成功却常被斥为浅薄与性别毒药。 --- ### [01:36:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=5810s) 传统收尾提问:该向谁道歉?——梅根·马克尔与极致的野心 节目进入《CEO日记》的经典收尾环节,上一位嘉宾会在卡片上为下一位未知的到访者留下一个问题。斯蒂芬·巴特利特(Steven Bartlett)翻出卡片念出道:“你本该向谁道歉却没有道歉,为什么?”蒂姆稍微思索后,给出了一个充满讽刺幽默的回答:梅根·马克尔(Meghan Markle)。蒂姆解释说,梅根最近推出了名为“美国里维埃拉果园”(American Riviera Orchard)的个人生活方式品牌,专门面向具有向上流动野心的女性销售精美玻璃器皿和餐具,这让他彻底对梅根改观,甚至“深感敬佩”。 蒂姆戏谑地表示,自己以前严重低估了梅根的“毫无廉耻”(shamelessness)。“她把自己所谓受到王室种族歧视待遇积累的全部社会资本,最终全盘变现为一个生活方式品牌,只为了让人们在圣巴巴拉(Santa Barbara)能用上漂亮的玻璃杯喝霞多丽白葡萄酒,这太完美了。”蒂姆调侃道,如果那个由三个凑在一起其实毫无逻辑但听上去格外优雅的词组构成的“美国里维埃拉果园”还在招人,他甚至愿意去求职。在蒂姆看来,很多人批判某人荒唐怪诞,但当这个人彻底接纳并展现这种怪诞与不择手段时,你反而不得不由衷赞叹。梅根公开鄙夷特权与阶级,转头却在蒙特西托(Montecito)的豪宅里兜售阶级生活方式。蒂姆认真地评价道,抛开道德与人品不谈,从纯粹的个人爬营(climber)结果来看,无数好莱坞十八线女星拼尽全力,却极少有人能一步登天爬进白金汉宫、再坐拥加州顶级豪宅,“单论这一结果,你必须得承认她的手腕”。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 梅根·马克尔的资本变现路径 accDescr: 展示梅根如何将王室遭遇与受害者叙事最终转化为高端生活方式消费品牌的商业闭环。 subgraph Narrative["王室与社会舆论资本"] A["好莱坞C咖女演员"] --> B["嫁入英国王室"] B --> C["制造受害者与阶级压迫叙事"] end subgraph Monetization["商业变现与阶级重塑"] C --> D["积累巨额关注度与社会资本"] D --> E["创立 'American Riviera Orchard' 品牌"] E --> F["在蒙特西托向富裕阶层售卖高端餐具与生活方式"] end ``` --- ### [01:40:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=6021s) 真正的心底歉意:对已故祖母的愧疚 面对蒂姆戏谑的回答,斯蒂芬笑着追问,表示如果不给出一个真诚严肃的答案绝不放他离开。蒂姆收敛了玩世不恭的笑容,坦言自己这辈子其实向很多人道过歉,但真正让他一直耿耿于怀的,是已经去世的祖母。 蒂姆回忆起自己早年深陷毒瘾、在街头彻底放纵堕落的那段岁月。祖母是他生命中极其重要的正向力量,但当时的自己过于自私,完全没有意识到自己的荒唐行径给身边至亲带来了多么深重的心理折磨。“人们往往意识不到自己的混乱行为会给他人带来多么巨大的焦虑。我那时只顾着在外面通宵鬼混、吸毒,根本没想到她每天都在为我提心吊胆、承受着无休止的担忧。”蒂姆动容地表示,如果人生能够倒流,能有机会再和祖母说一句话,他一定会当面向她道歉,为自己当年的极度自私与不体贴请求原谅。 --- ### [01:41:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=6071s) 结语与巡演致谢:游走在“不可接受”边缘的幽默 访谈尾声,斯蒂芬向蒂姆表达了极高的赞誉,坦言蒂姆可能是自己最喜欢的单口喜剧演员。斯蒂芬坦承,每当自己在高压的生活与工作中感到挣扎时,蒂姆的表演总能给他带来极大的快乐与释怀。蒂姆那种甚至游走在主流社会“不可接受”边缘的辛辣幽默,精准投射了人们大脑中平日里不敢在公众面前展露的另一面,在这个人们言行愈发谨慎恐惧的时代显得弥足珍贵。 斯蒂芬向听众热情推荐了蒂姆即将在英国及欧洲展开的全新单口喜剧巡演“美国王室”(American Royalty),包括在标志性场馆皇家阿尔伯特音乐厅(Royal Albert Hall)的大型演出。蒂姆则一如既往地用地狱笑话回应,调侃巡演虽然也包括芬兰等国家,但“那些地方对我乃至对整个世界其实都没那么重要”。在斯蒂芬赞叹蒂姆不擅长接受他人夸奖时,蒂姆幽默地道谢:“平时大家基本上都是在冲我大吼大叫,所以确实不太习惯被夸,但非常感谢你邀请我来,我聊得很开心。”整场长谈在真诚与荒诞交织的笑声中正式落幕。 ## Notable quotes > [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=0s) 因为我是同性恋 — 蒂姆·狄龙 > [02:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=122s) 我从 13 岁到 25 岁一直是个隐瞒性取向的可卡因成瘾者。 — 蒂姆·狄龙 > [03:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=203s) 当你遇到一个脱口秀演员,你不要问他们本人是否有抑郁症,你应该问他们的父母中哪一个有抑郁症。 — 吉米·卡尔 > [03:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=203s) 我的母亲患有精神分裂症。如果精神疾病也有等级的话,她那可是‘黄金标准’,相比之下抑郁症都不算什么了。 — 蒂姆·狄龙 > [09:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=545s) 那些我妈几十年前碎碎念的疯话,现在居然全成了美国国会议员在国会大厦里发表的高见。 — 蒂姆·狄龙 > [27:41](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=1661s) 喜剧演员的职责就是去找到那条底线,然后跨过去。 — 乔治·卡林 > [39:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2382s) 我们已经放弃了孩子。未来不再属于年轻人,未来属于人工智能,未来属于机器人技术。 — 蒂姆·狄龙 > [49:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=2958s) 前九洞非常精彩,后九洞则相当艰难。 — 蒂姆·狄龙 > [54:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=3296s) 如果你跟我出去吃顿晚饭,我在饭桌上聊的跟我播客里讲的一模一样 — 蒂姆·狄龙 > [01:13:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=4405s) 这就是为什么迪拜在赢,这就是为什么中国在赢!看看你们这群人,你们长得一模一样,全是土豆,却在冲着稍微有点不一样的土豆咆哮,这太蠢了! — 蒂姆·狄龙 > [01:17:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=4660s) 去把自己活活累死吧,我好开着我的游艇出海度假 — 蒂姆·狄龙 > [01:36:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8&t=5810s) 她把自己所谓受到王室种族歧视待遇积累的全部社会资本,最终全盘变现为一个生活方式品牌,只为了让人们在圣巴巴拉能用上漂亮的玻璃杯喝霞多丽白葡萄酒,这太完美了。 — 蒂姆·狄龙 ## Mentioned 蒂姆·狄龙 (Tim Dillon), 史蒂芬·巴特利特 (Steven Bartlett), 吉米·卡尔 (Jimmy Carr), 乔治·卡林 (George Carlin), 乔·罗根 (Joe Rogan), 亚当·卡罗拉 (Adam Carolla), 马克·马龙 (Marc Maron), 梅根·马克尔 (Meghan Markle), 奥普拉·温弗瑞 (Oprah Winfrey), 泰勒·佩里 (Tyler Perry), 罗伯特·德尼罗 (Robert De Niro), 蒂娜·特纳 (Tina Turner), 安德鲁·泰特 (Andrew Tate), 埃隆·马斯克 (Elon Musk), 乔·拜登 (Joe Biden), 唐纳德·特朗普 (Donald Trump), The Tim Dillon Show, The Diary Of A CEO, The Joe Rogan Experience, 芝麻街 (Sesame Street), 安妮拿起你的枪 (Annie Get Your Gun), Tim Dillon: A Real Hero, American Royalty, American Riviera Orchard, Spotify, TikTok, YouTube, Twitter / X, CAA (Creative Artists Agency), 波音公司 (Boeing), 黑石集团 (BlackRock), Zoe, 匿名戒酒会 (AA), 皇家阿尔伯特音乐厅 (Royal Albert Hall), 海德公园一号 (One Hyde Park), 好莱坞即兴喜剧俱乐部 (Hollywood Improv) ## Video description Tim Dillon is a comedian, actor, and host of the Tim Dillon Show podcast. In 2017, Rolling Stone magazine named him as one of the top 10 comics you need to know, and in 2022, he released his first Netflix standup special, 'Tim Dillon: A Real Hero’. 00:00 Intro 02:01 I Was a Closeted Gay Addict 03:23 Which One of Your Parents Were Depressed? 07:03 The Impact of Your Parent's Mental Illnesses on You 09:05 Your Parents Divorce 12:32 Childhood Trauma & Taking Drugs 15:51 Hitting Rock Bottom 19:40 AA Meetings 23:15 Trying to Get Sober 24:27 Being a Juror on a Murder Crime 27:41 His First Open Mic Comedy Show 29:25 The Taboos in Comedy 33:20 Why You Don't Get Cancelled 36:09 The Podcasting World 39:42 What’s Up With The Different Generations? 48:09 What Are His Goals in Comedy 49:18 Have You Processed Your Trauma? 55:38 His Experience with Therapy 58:24 Coming Out as Gay & Dating 01:01:50 What Do You Love About Yourself? 01:05:00 Mental Health Coping Mechanisms 01:07:27 Elon Musk Buying Twitter 01:08:35 Social Media Criticism 01:09:46 Touring The World 01:15:03 What Happens in Hollywood? 01:17:40 Rising to the Top: The American Dream 01:20:51 New Generations Don't Work Hard 01:21:49 Remote Working 01:25:05 The Future of AI 01:30:26 Men's Mental Health 01:33:53 Andrew Tate's Influence 01:34:49 Who Should You Have Apologized to and You Didn't? You can purchase tickets to Tim’s new show, ‘American Royalty’, here: https://bit.ly/4aHE6JN You can watch ‘The Tim Dillon Show,’ here: https://bit.ly/3U1DOYp Follow Tim: Twitter - https://bit.ly/49oMOLV Instagram - https://bit.ly/3PPbRRb YouTube - https://bit.ly/3U1DOYp Conversations Cards: https://thediary.com/products/the-conversation-cards-1st-edition Follow me: https://beacons.ai/diaryofaceo Sponsors: Zoe: http://joinzoe.com with an exclusive code CEO10 for 10% off This episode of The Diary Of A CEO was filmed at Gold Tree Studios, located in the heart of the Sunset Strip, West Hollywood, California [Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5lAgTvbGS8)

Source quotes

[0:00] 蒂姆·狄龙: 因为我是同性恋 [2:02] 蒂姆·狄龙: 我从 13 岁到 25 岁一直是个隐瞒性取向的可卡因成瘾者。 [3:23] 吉米·卡尔: 当你遇到一个脱口秀演员,你不要问他们本人是否有抑郁症,你应该问他们的父母中哪一个有抑郁症。 [3:23] 蒂姆·狄龙: 我的母亲患有精神分裂症。如果精神疾病也有等级的话,她那可是‘黄金标准’,相比之下抑郁症都不算什么了。 [9:05] 蒂姆·狄龙: 那些我妈几十年前碎碎念的疯话,现在居然全成了美国国会议员在国会大厦里发表的高见。 [27:41] 乔治·卡林: 喜剧演员的职责就是去找到那条底线,然后跨过去。 [39:42] 蒂姆·狄龙: 我们已经放弃了孩子。未来不再属于年轻人,未来属于人工智能,未来属于机器人技术。 [49:18] 蒂姆·狄龙: 前九洞非常精彩,后九洞则相当艰难。 [54:56] 蒂姆·狄龙: 如果你跟我出去吃顿晚饭,我在饭桌上聊的跟我播客里讲的一模一样 [73:25] 蒂姆·狄龙: 这就是为什么迪拜在赢,这就是为什么中国在赢!看看你们这群人,你们长得一模一样,全是土豆,却在冲着稍微有点不一样的土豆咆哮,这太蠢了! [77:40] 蒂姆·狄龙: 去把自己活活累死吧,我好开着我的游艇出海度假 [96:50] 蒂姆·狄龙: 她把自己所谓受到王室种族歧视待遇积累的全部社会资本,最终全盘变现为一个生活方式品牌,只为了让人们在圣巴巴拉能用上漂亮的玻璃杯喝霞多丽白葡萄酒,这太完美了。

Source quotes

[0:00] Tim Dillon: We've bred some of the least interesting people on the planet. Influencers... these generic barcodes with feet, those people don't need to exist. They need to be replaced by an AI version of that. [29:25] Tim Dillon: As George Carlin said, your job is to find out where the line is, cross it... [54:58] Tim Dillon: I look at a landscape of stories and articles... I don't have an agenda. I'm not sponsored by the person in this article... What's the funniest take, and how does this explain something larger that's going on? [61:51] Tim Dillon: Growing up the way I grew up, there's a version of me that's just a druggy, that's just on the street, that's dead, that is blaming everyone else... I could have been that guy. I was that guy for many years... I'm happy I was able to get rid of that. [69:46] Tim Dillon: This is why Dubai is winning! Look at you people... You're all potatoes screaming at other potatoes that they're slightly different kinds of potatoes! [75:03] Tim Dillon: Everybody in this town is replaceable. Everybody feels that... So, everybody's waiting for instructions. Nobody wants to act. Everybody's waiting for somebody else to let them know what's okay. [82:09] Tim Dillon: you're using volume right now [82:09] Tim Dillon: you keep coming into my physical space

Original transcript

[0:00] Zoomers, some of them have figured out [0:02] that the country's a scam. They invent [0:04] mental health ailments they don't have. [0:06] They take days off on end. They terrify [0:08] their superiors. They found the flaw in [0:10] the system. They go, "Why are you late?" [0:12] They go, "I'm gay." You go, "Don't worry [0:15] about it." Are we still on YouTube? [0:18] Tim Dillon. [0:19] He's a comic icon. [0:21] A master of improv. [0:22] One of the best in the world. [0:24] I like making people laugh at stuff that [0:26] is inherently maybe a little darker [0:27] because [0:28] from 13 to 25, I was a closeted gay [0:32] cocaine addict. But, some of our best [0:35] qualities don't come about because of [0:36] the best reasons. [0:38] There's no one better at those random [0:40] rants. [0:40] Tim, there's a lot of topics I want to [0:42] go through with you. And the first is [0:44] the future of AI. [0:45] We've bred some of the least interesting [0:47] people on the planet. [0:49] Influencers. [0:50] These generic barcodes with feet, those [0:53] people don't need to exist. They need to [0:55] be replaced by an AI version of that. [0:57] What's your assessment of different [0:59] generations? [0:59] Well, we've given up on the children. [1:01] They're being raised by algorithms. The [1:02] boomers, they're the funniest generation [1:04] because to be funny, you kind of have to [1:06] just not care. And there's no generation [1:08] of people that have cared less about the [1:11] future of this planet, about their [1:12] children. And then the millennials, [1:14] we're this very shitty generation of [1:15] like want to constantly be patted on the [1:18] back and told how great they are. I [1:20] believe the right things. I tweeted the [1:21] right thing. I am good. [1:24] I know that's unpopular maybe to say, [1:27] but I'll just keep going. [1:30] Before this episode starts, I have a [1:31] small favor to ask from you. Two months [1:34] ago, 74% of people that watch this [1:36] channel didn't subscribe. We're now down [1:38] to 69%. [1:40] My goal is 50%. So, if you've ever liked [1:43] any of the videos we've posted, if you [1:45] like this channel, can you do me a quick [1:46] favor and hit the subscribe button? It [1:48] helps this channel more than you know. [1:49] And the bigger the channel gets, as [1:51] you've seen, the bigger the guest get. [1:53] Thank you and enjoy this episode. [2:02] Tim, [2:03] I've [2:04] watched you for many a year. Now, and I [2:06] think you're one of the [2:08] most exceptional, [2:11] interesting, provocative, [2:14] talented comedians because you have a [2:17] remarkable ability to [2:19] to to improvise, it seems. [2:22] Well, thank you. [2:24] And I wonder how someone learns to do [2:28] that. Where does that talent come from? [2:30] I was a a closeted gay cocaine addict [2:34] for many years. [2:35] Um [2:36] you really have to be good on your feet [2:39] when you are uh a closeted gay cocaine [2:42] addict from like 13 to 25, you you're [2:46] going to run into situations where [2:48] you're going to need to [2:50] uh lie, [2:52] and you're going to need to be able to [2:53] kind of uh you know, filibuster, [2:57] and uh I guess I got good at it then. [3:00] I was always good at talking, but I [3:02] think that was good. That kind of [3:04] allowed me [3:06] to think on my feet more than other [3:09] people would have to, [3:11] perhaps. [3:12] Not always for the best reasons. Some of [3:14] our best qualities don't come about [3:16] because of the best reasons. [3:18] But it's good that I have that quality [3:20] now, I guess. [3:23] Do you know Jimmy Carr? [3:24] I don't know him personally. I I I adore [3:26] his comedy, and he's like a an amazing [3:29] comedian, but I don't I don't know if [3:30] we've met. [3:31] I was sat here with him 2 weeks ago, and [3:32] he said to me, he says, "Steve, when you [3:33] meet a comedian, you don't ask a [3:35] comedian if they're depressed. You ask [3:36] them which one of their parents is [3:38] depressed." [3:39] That's a good way to say it. Sure. Well, [3:41] my mother was a schizophrenic, so I tend [3:44] to think on the mental illness [3:45] hierarchy, she was kind of [3:47] kind of the gold standard, whereas [3:49] depression, all all respect, is slightly [3:51] less. [3:53] Um and then I think my father might have [3:54] been on and off depressed. But [3:56] schizophrenia was the [3:59] that was the um [4:01] you know, [4:02] central challenge in her life. [4:06] For people that don't know what that is [4:07] or haven't experienced it, what is how [4:09] does it sort of manifest being [4:11] schizophrenic? Especially for you as a [4:13] you know, 10-year-old when you have a [4:14] schizophrenic parent? [4:14] Yeah. It started to really come out when [4:17] when I was about 13 [4:19] and 12 or 13. [4:21] Um uh it's a lot of paranoia. [4:24] It's a lot of confusion [4:26] that as a child you're trying to [4:28] contextualize. You don't really [4:30] understand why your mother is talking [4:33] about people following her or these [4:36] grand elaborate uh stories that aren't [4:39] true and even at 12 or 13 you know [4:42] they're not true. [4:43] And you're worried for her because [4:47] physical illness is very easy to kind of [4:50] understand as a child because, you know, [4:54] somebody else gets sick. As a child you [4:56] get sick. So you get it. Mental illness [4:59] is much tougher to understand. As a [5:02] child you only really start to [5:04] understand it as you go through life and [5:07] when you become more of an adult you [5:08] start to look back at it because you've [5:11] had your own mental struggles. You know [5:12] people that have had mental struggles. [5:14] At 12 you really don't [5:16] for most 12-year-olds. So it's something [5:18] that I've understood more as I got older [5:21] and then it was kind of just very [5:23] disorienting and confusing. [5:25] And what was the the sort of cost or the [5:29] impact that that confusion had? Cuz [5:31] yeah, you're so right. [5:33] With schizophrenia in particular when [5:35] you can compare how your parents are [5:37] acting to other parents, [5:39] that sort of disparity of that like [5:41] distinction must be quite [5:43] It's jarring. [5:44] Yeah. [5:44] It's jarring. When you're young and you [5:46] are at somebody house and you see the [5:49] way their mother is talking [5:51] and you see the way that the family [5:54] interacts [5:56] and in your house when that is different [5:58] and my mother was a very fun person, [6:00] very eccentric um a free spirit her [6:04] whole entire life she had been. It [6:06] wasn't hellish to grow up with her. I I [6:09] loved her and she loved me a lot. [6:12] But around my early teen years it became [6:15] apparent that something was wrong. [6:19] I think I was in the car one day [6:22] and I remember she said there are people [6:24] that are following us but don't worry [6:25] they're protecting me and I found that [6:27] to be so crazy like doubly crazy, right? [6:31] Not only did she believe that there were [6:32] people following her but that they were [6:33] doing it to protect her. [6:36] I thought that was so crazy and I [6:38] remember being young and hearing that [6:41] and internalizing that as something is [6:43] actually really wrong. [6:46] And [6:47] I remember thinking about it and telling [6:49] a friend of mine like [6:51] I think my mother, you know, is crazy, [6:55] you know, and I I don't know, you know. [6:57] And and that got progressively worse as [7:01] I got older. [7:03] And what was the impact of all of that [7:04] on you? Like growing up in that family [7:06] home, how does that shape you and does [7:07] that leave any sort of fingerprints on [7:08] you that are still with you today in [7:10] terms of comedy or who you are? [7:11] Yeah, for sure. Um the fragility [7:15] of [7:17] mental health [7:19] is something that I understand in a way [7:21] that other people don't. [7:23] Um I understand that people [7:28] uh can have a nervous breakdown, people [7:30] can, you know, have uh you know, a [7:32] stress-related event that tips them in a [7:35] direction where you know, and I've had [7:37] friends that have had this, right? Like, [7:39] you know, it's a difficult [7:41] uh thing to understand at 12 or 13. But, [7:45] that was a huge impact on me [7:47] uh growing up uh was basically [7:51] your world is rocked a little bit when [7:53] someone is suffering from a mental [7:55] health issue. You feel less secure, less [7:59] safe. You kind of feel like uh something [8:04] is coming that isn't good. You know, [8:06] schizophrenia is a degenerative [8:08] disorder. There is no real cure. There [8:11] are medications that can um [8:14] make uh [8:16] the effects less apparent for periods of [8:18] time. Those medications have really bad [8:22] physical side effects. So, watching my [8:24] mother go through a lot of like physical [8:25] side effects from those medications, you [8:28] know, the rocking back and forth, right? [8:31] Uh um muscle twitches and things like [8:33] that uh was also very was very tough to [8:36] watch as [8:37] you know, as I got older and and and she [8:39] was medicated [8:41] uh with some very strong drugs to try to [8:44] like, you know, I guess uh mitigate the [8:47] schizophrenia. It's It's very tough. [8:49] It's [8:50] It's akin to a loved one getting a [8:52] physical ailment. It's very similar to [8:55] that in the sense that um you know, you [8:59] are saying goodbye in a way to someone [9:03] little by little. [9:05] And your father, your your parents [9:06] divorced around this time as well. [9:08] Yeah. Yeah. [9:09] And that's what compounds things, I [9:10] imagine. [9:11] Yes, I believe that that was an event [9:13] that probably was uh [9:15] I I believe she was always a [9:16] schizophrenic. There was there was an [9:17] underlying predilection for that. I [9:19] mean, from speaking to doctors, this is [9:20] what I believe. I believe that the [9:22] divorce, the stress, that was but she [9:24] she initiated the divorce. I think it [9:26] was a catalyst for her to feel perhaps [9:31] vulnerable or or she, you know, I think [9:34] a lot of stress brought on kind of the [9:38] symptoms cuz I had never There were [9:40] always indications. [9:42] She was kind of a again a wild person, [9:45] right? She would go out and collect [9:47] these Disney toy sets at McDonald's. She [9:49] would collect Beanie Babies. She would [9:50] pick up junk on the street and say we're [9:52] going to fix it up and refurbish it and [9:55] these are antiques and everything. There [9:57] was a lot of compulsive obsession [9:59] obsessive kind of behavior. [10:03] Um [10:03] some of the behavior now, you know, a [10:06] little conspiratorial. [10:08] I do a joke now that where I talk about [10:10] it. I go, you know, the people that are [10:12] saying the things that my mother said [10:14] for years are now in Congress. So, [10:17] you know, [10:18] had we known about YouTube, we could [10:20] have thrown her on there. She would have [10:21] made a good living. [10:23] You know, really she would have done [10:24] well. She was a personable woman. But [10:26] yeah, I mean, that was that was tough [10:28] because he was out of the house. She was [10:32] there and she was struggling and because [10:35] I'm from an Irish Catholic family, [10:36] nobody talked about it and people would [10:39] use words like eccentric or she's fun. [10:43] Be like Patty's fun. Nobody would really [10:46] go, "Wow, I think she's got a real [10:48] problem." [10:49] And you were sort of 13 years old, so [10:50] you're going through all of the you [10:51] know, the stuff 13-year-olds go through [10:54] figuring out life. You got got any [10:55] siblings? [10:56] No. [10:57] Okay. [10:57] Just me. [10:58] Okay. [10:59] Just me. [11:01] That's [11:01] All the fun for me. [11:03] Yeah. [11:03] Just one. [11:05] Uh yeah, it was just me. [11:07] Do you think you were parented from that [11:08] point onwards really? [11:09] No. No. I kind of grew up. [11:13] And it's the generation to a degree as [11:15] well. I think I'm more of an extreme [11:17] case because my mother cared about me [11:19] and she wanted, you know, she hated [11:21] drugs and alcohol. She hated cigarettes. [11:24] She hated all these things that if, you [11:25] know, she would, you know, find a thing, [11:28] she would go nuts and scream. She was [11:29] never like a permissive person. She did [11:31] not [11:33] encourage any of my behaviors. She [11:35] always wanted me to succeed and she was [11:38] always very, [11:39] you know, critical of of my behavior. [11:42] So, there was that sense. There was [11:43] parenting in that sense where it wasn't [11:46] a free-for-all, right? But, [11:47] generationally, you know, we just [11:49] weren't parented the way kids today are [11:51] parented. There were no cell phones. [11:53] There was no, uh, you know, "Where is [11:55] your location?" Nobody was being [11:57] tracked. You were able to spend hours on [11:59] your bike riding around the suburbs with [12:01] your friends. You had a curfew. You had [12:03] to be in by curfew. You had to make sure [12:05] that your eyes weren't bloodshot when [12:07] you went home because, you know, you [12:10] were smoking weed for the entire time [12:12] you were gone. Um, [12:14] so, there were things like that. But, in [12:16] addition to that, which is a kind of a [12:18] generational difference in parenting, [12:20] there was just the idea that she was [12:22] dealing with her own issues. And my [12:25] father was out of the picture. So, I had [12:27] this freedom where it's kind of like I [12:28] kind of raised myself in a weird way. [12:32] A lot of freedom and a lot of trauma, by [12:34] the sounds of it. [12:35] Yes. [12:36] Yes. Yeah. There was a lot, I would say, [12:39] um, unprocessed for a long time. [12:43] And that tends to find an avenue. [12:46] Unprocessed trauma, right? [12:47] It tends to find an avenue. For many [12:49] years it was drugs. That was the avenue, [12:52] which is where a lot of it goes, you [12:53] know. Um, and then [12:55] How old were you when you started drugs? [12:57] I was I started smoking weed in eighth [13:00] grade and, uh, seventh seventh grade. [13:03] The summer [13:04] between seventh grade and eighth grade, [13:08] uh, I I smoked weed a few times in [13:10] seventh grade. And the summer between [13:12] seventh and eighth grade, I we really [13:13] ramped it up. We really, you know, [13:16] um, I was friends with a a girl in my [13:19] town who was fun. She was a a lesbian [13:22] who rollerbladed everywhere, uh, which I [13:24] thought was an interesting archetype and [13:25] I still do. [13:26] Uh, and she always was smoking weed [13:29] while she rollerbladed, and I thought it [13:30] was a very cool, you know, she's kind of [13:32] a goth lesbian who smoked weed and just [13:34] kind of very London, to be honest. And [13:36] she would just kind of rollerblade [13:37] places high all the time, and I just [13:40] became friends with her, and I said, [13:41] "This seems like a good way to live." [13:43] And, uh, I just, you know, started [13:46] smoking weed with her, and then very [13:47] quickly, you know, within a year that, [13:50] you know, we were doing blow and acid, [13:52] you know, I dropped acid on stage in my [13:54] eighth-grade graduation, uh, you know, [13:57] with her and and another buddy of mine. [13:58] We, you know, drop dropped tabs of acid. [14:01] Uh, we were doing ecstasy, we were doing [14:03] lines of special K. It was a good time, [14:06] you know? I mean, this was obviously a [14:08] response to everything I just talked [14:09] about, but you know, drugs are a lot of [14:11] fun. They have a lot of negatives, [14:14] but they that period of my life was was [14:17] a lot of fun, and terrible. But, you [14:20] know, that's why I haven't done any of [14:21] any drugs or had a drink in 14 years. [14:24] So, I'm not advising it. It's not a [14:25] course of action I advise, but looking [14:27] back at it, there, you know, there were [14:29] certainly good times. [14:31] I know that's unpopular, maybe, to say. [14:34] I don't think that, you know, it wasn't [14:36] all terrible is my point. [14:39] But, don't do it. [14:41] But, you know what I mean? But, I [14:43] wouldn't have traded those moments for [14:45] anything. But, it's not a good thing to [14:48] do. I would have rather be like a hot [14:50] surfer or have gotten into sports or [14:53] something. [14:54] What about Were you comedic at that age? [14:57] Probably. Yeah, I was always kind of a [14:59] goofball. [14:59] So, were people Were people telling you [15:01] at that age that you were funny? [15:02] Yes. I would like to make people laugh. [15:05] I, you know, would imitate, uh, we had a [15:08] teacher who died. She was a smoker, and [15:09] she died of lung cancer, and she had a [15:11] voice like this, and I would imitate her [15:13] in the back of class, [15:15] and I would be like, "I'm here, and I'm [15:16] in hell now, and because of you." You [15:18] know, things like that. Um, and I would [15:21] I would just we would, you know, it was [15:22] always kind of like we'd drive around [15:24] Long Island, we'd smoke marijuana in [15:26] cars, and I would point at big houses. [15:28] That's kind of a lot of what we did, you [15:30] know, we'd drive around like rich areas [15:31] because no one was ever home. No one's [15:33] ever home in these rich areas, by the [15:34] way. Too real, you know, that's just [15:36] something your audience can take with [15:37] them. Rich people don't they're never [15:40] home. [15:41] So, we would just smoke pot and you [15:42] know, drive around and then I would just [15:45] try to be funny and sometimes I would be [15:47] funny and sometimes I guess I would be [15:48] annoying. But, I was always trying to be [15:51] funny. [15:51] What was the um the age range of drug [15:53] usage in town? Was there a [15:55] Yeah. [15:56] a [15:58] a rock bottom? I was going to say a [15:59] peak, but it actually goes the other way [16:00] when it we talk about drugs, doesn't it? [16:01] Yes. So, the rock bottom was I was 25. I [16:05] owned a house that I had bought with a [16:06] subprime mortgage in a town called [16:09] Baldwin, New York, and I was an [16:12] alcoholic. I had not come out of the [16:13] closet. I had not done any kind of [16:15] stand-up comedy. I was working at a [16:19] mortgage bank in Long Island several [16:22] years after the mortgage [16:24] um [16:25] industry had completely collapsed. There [16:27] was really nothing to do. It was an [16:29] incredibly depressing place. I worked [16:31] next to a guy who uh was kind of losing [16:34] his mind. He was just he was losing his [16:36] house, but he was ordering koi fish for [16:39] a pond. He wanted to have a nice koi [16:40] pond, and he would spend the majority of [16:43] the day. His wife would call and scream [16:44] at him, "We have nothing. We're going to [16:46] die." And he would always just call [16:48] people. He'd go, "What what size are the [16:50] fish? [16:51] And how many of the fish can I get?" You [16:54] know, so everybody was kind of losing [16:55] their mind at that point in in this [16:58] particular very bleak office um you [17:02] know, kind of industrial park in Long [17:03] Island, and I was just sitting there [17:05] trying to be a a billionaire in real [17:07] estate, I guess. And uh [17:10] I was hanging out with my friend's [17:12] father, who's who's passed away, but he [17:15] was a really fun guy. Um he was such a [17:17] fun guy, I was in two boating accidents [17:20] with him. That's how fun he was. Most [17:23] people tap out after one boating [17:25] accident. I was in two boating accidents [17:26] with this man. Um, he had three DWIs and [17:30] a BWI. A BWI is boating while [17:32] intoxicated. It's incredibly difficult [17:36] to get a boating while intoxicated. It's [17:39] a actual accomplishment. [17:41] He was a fun guy. He never had a job his [17:43] whole life. He sold drugs. [17:45] Um, and his wife worked, and I was [17:48] friends with his son. I went to high [17:49] school with his son, but this guy was so [17:51] much fun. I we adored him. There was one [17:53] time me and my friend were sitting at a [17:54] bar. It was an outdoor bar in Long [17:56] Island, you know, that kind of dumb tiki [17:58] bar vibe. And his father came up to us. [18:00] It was me and my friend and a few girls [18:02] that we were friends with. And he said, [18:04] um, I want I want you guys like I'm [18:07] going to buy all your drinks. And we [18:09] said, okay, thanks. And then he walked [18:11] to the bartender. He pointed at us. He [18:13] pointed at himself. The bartender thumbs [18:15] up. We gave him a thumbs up. We said, [18:16] okay. We never got the drinks. We [18:18] forgot. About an hour later, we got a [18:20] tab that was like $2,500. We go, what [18:23] what the hell's going on? And the [18:24] bartender said, you just you agreed to [18:26] pay that man's tab. He pointed at you. [18:29] You said thumbs up. He's been drinking [18:30] here for 2 days. He has no money. [18:32] That's the type of guy he was, right? He [18:35] was just a fun guy. I mean, you know, so [18:37] we would go for [18:39] out on Long Island from bar to bar in [18:41] his little boat. He had like this little [18:43] little uh, cigarette boat, like a real [18:45] little, you know, and we'd go from bar [18:47] to bar to bar. [18:49] And one time, I was 24 years old, we [18:53] we were going really fast. It was late [18:54] at night, and we just ran up on like a [18:57] marsh, and we were both thrown out of [18:59] the boat. And I like I literally came to [19:01] in like a nest of egrets, that bird. Had [19:04] those big white birds that and I was [19:06] just in the middle of it. And I felt to [19:08] my side. I said, my life is kind of out [19:10] of control. That was the rock bottom. [19:11] That was kind of the where I said to [19:13] myself, I said, "You know what? This is [19:15] I could have been paralyzed. I could [19:16] have been killed. I'm like, this is [19:18] probably not going to end well if I keep [19:19] drinking." So, I was laying in that [19:20] egret's nest at probably 1:00 in the [19:23] morning in the middle uh of you know, [19:26] the Long Island Sound or wherever I was. [19:27] I think we're in the ocean. We're on [19:28] We're in Freeport. And uh I was just [19:31] basically going like, "This is a real [19:33] problem." So, then I went to to AA. You [19:35] know, I started I I was like, "This is [19:38] This is probably time to like fix this." [19:41] So, you made the decision to go to AA? [19:43] Yeah. [19:43] I'm trying to figure out how you get [19:44] from that egret's nest [19:45] Yeah. [19:46] to that first AA session cuz it doesn't [19:48] seem like one just wakes up the next day [19:49] and goes, "Okay, I'm going to go to AA." [19:51] Well, I it wasn't the next day, but I I [19:54] woke up and what what basically happened [19:56] was I [19:58] I was around a lot of really uh [20:02] end-stage alcoholics, meaning like these [20:05] people had drank their entire lives. I [20:08] was hanging at this bar called Lisa's [20:10] Lounge, which was a bar in Long Island. [20:13] It was in the town I lived in and up the [20:15] block from the house that was foreclosed [20:17] was this bar. I could walk to it. It was [20:19] named, I kid you not, after a woman who [20:22] died in a drunk driving accident. Her [20:24] father had named the bar after her. She [20:27] had died. She was hit by a drunk driver [20:29] and he named the bar after her. And [20:31] people would to And she her picture was [20:33] on the I mean, this is unreal. This is [20:35] true. Her picture was on the wall of the [20:37] bar and people would toast her, "To [20:39] Lisa." And everybody would get drunk. It [20:41] was a It was a [20:42] It was a great community [20:44] of people and it was a lot of drugs and [20:47] alcohol and people that had uh you know, [20:50] nowhere to go. Nowhere to go. Like the [20:53] the owner told me once, he goes, as [20:54] people doing coke on the pool table, he [20:56] goes, "I I opened this bar, I swear to [20:58] God." He said this because I opened this [20:59] bar because I really wanted people that [21:01] didn't have a place to go to have [21:02] somewhere to go on Christmas. [21:05] And then he just did a line of cocaine [21:06] and I said, "Well, that's a nice thing." [21:08] At 24 years old, I thought that was a [21:10] great thing. Um and I was just like [21:13] hanging out in this [21:14] old man bar. This was not a fun bar. [21:17] This is not where you'd go to get laid. [21:19] This was not a club. This was not This [21:21] was the end. The end of late-stage [21:26] alcoholism after decades. People found [21:30] themselves here. And it was so close to [21:32] my house, I went there. And um [21:35] that was, you know, [21:38] that was a weight. [21:40] Every night when I went to bed, I I [21:42] looked at their lives and I said, "I'm [21:44] young, but this is where I'm going. This [21:47] is where I'm heading." I had that [21:50] example kind of right in front of me. [21:52] And that, together with my friend's [21:55] father, together with that accident, [21:58] started to basically I said, "I've got [22:00] to make a choice now or this is where [22:02] I'm going." [22:03] Which seemed a little bit worse than [22:06] death. Sitting there in a bar every [22:08] night, being afraid of who I was, being [22:10] afraid of trying something in life that [22:13] I loved, trying to make something of [22:15] myself, sitting in that bar, drinking my [22:18] life away, felt like a a huge failure. I [22:23] didn't want to fail. So, that's why I [22:25] stopped. [22:26] There was still something in you. There [22:28] was still some kind of desire or fight [22:30] in you, which isn't always there for [22:31] some people who are in sort of that [22:32] late-stage addiction. There was some [22:34] reason to persist, right? [22:36] Yes. Well, [22:37] I thought that I could have a better [22:39] life. And that's all you need, I think. [22:42] And I think that that is the [22:44] primary [22:46] motivating factor for anyone to change [22:49] anything in their life is that they have [22:52] the hope or the idea, they have the [22:54] imagination that they can have a better [22:56] life. If you can conceive of a better [22:58] life. So, I said there's probably a [23:00] version of me that's not drunk every [23:01] day, that's not working at a dead-end [23:04] job, that's doing something that he [23:05] likes. And it was tough. It's not hard [23:08] to change, very difficult to change [23:09] anything, but that was that was my, you [23:12] know, moment where I had that [23:14] realization. [23:15] Did you know what that better life [23:16] looked like specifically, or did you [23:18] just know that it existed? [23:20] Well, I I knew that it was sobriety. So, [23:22] I knew that it was being sober. I didn't [23:25] have a road map for exactly what it [23:27] would be, but I knew that it wouldn't [23:28] involve sitting in a bar, getting drunk [23:31] next to someone named Marge, you know, [23:33] for example, right? I knew that it would [23:35] be sobriety, I knew that it would be [23:37] honesty, [23:38] and those two things go hand in hand. [23:41] So, [23:42] that was what I knew. And I And I'd [23:44] always wanted, you know, as an actor, as [23:45] a little kid, right? From 6 years old to [23:49] 13 to 12, I acted. I was in theater, I [23:52] was in plays, I was in Sesame Street on [23:55] on the show Sesame Street a few times. I [23:57] toured around the country in 6th grade [23:59] with my mother right before the divorce, [24:01] right before the onset of her symptoms, [24:04] um with a a Broadway show, Annie Get [24:06] Your Gun. I I was an actor. I I liked [24:09] performing. I enjoyed that life. I'd [24:12] given up to do drugs when I was like 13, [24:16] but then when I sobered up around 25, [24:19] about exactly 25, I went to a stand-up [24:23] comedy open mic, and that that was the [24:24] thing that kind of pivoted the direction [24:26] of my life. [24:27] So, does this all happen around the same [24:28] time, the AA meeting, the first stand-up [24:32] comedy [24:32] Yes. [24:33] The AA thing in particular, was that [24:35] difficult for you because I I kind of [24:36] understand the 12-step program, and [24:39] there's some quite challenging elements [24:40] of that. [24:41] 100%. I was also around this time a [24:43] juror on a murder trial. This is [24:45] something that I shouldn't leave out cuz [24:47] this really did impact me as well. There [24:50] was a murder trial in Long Island. It [24:53] was pretty [24:54] uh [24:55] well-known. I was unknown to me at the [24:58] time I was selected, but [25:00] a a guy had murdered the mother of his [25:02] children, and he was an informant for [25:04] the police, and [25:06] they had failed to follow up on many [25:08] orders of protection [25:10] that this woman had against him because [25:12] he was providing them information. They [25:14] subsequently after the verdict settled [25:17] an $8 million lawsuit with her family, [25:18] paid paid her $8 million. So, this was [25:21] like a pretty big case. It involved [25:24] police, you know, malfeasance, and [25:26] things like that. Um and I was selected [25:29] as a juror, and I really wanted to be a [25:30] juror on this case because I was bored [25:33] in my life, and I thought that maybe it [25:35] would be interesting to be a juror on a [25:38] murder trial. You know, I thought it was [25:40] going to be something stupid like [25:41] someone fell in a Wendy's and wanted [25:43] $100,000, but I heard it was murder one, [25:47] you know, and I'm like, "Well, that's [25:48] fun." [25:50] You sit there every day, and every day [25:52] it's just mortality is is the theme of [25:56] every single day. Life, her life, his [26:00] life, [26:01] his life being taken, you know, him [26:04] losing his freedom, her life being [26:06] taken. [26:07] And that really kind of [26:10] impacted me, too, because I was you [26:11] going to bars every night drinking after [26:13] that thinking [26:15] about life and going, "I'm on a a really [26:17] bad course, and I got to change." And [26:21] hey, it was tough. It was difficult [26:22] because [26:24] it's hard to be vulnerable. [26:27] Like as a comedian, you hide behind the [26:29] jokes and the bits and things like that. [26:32] But in that room, you can't do that. So, [26:34] that is difficult. The God thing was [26:36] difficult. The higher power. I had to [26:40] come to that in a in a different way. [26:43] There's There are challenges. You know, [26:45] being honest is it was a big challenge. [26:48] I was like, "God, they're like, you have [26:49] to be honest." And I'm like, "Okay. I [26:51] can stop drinking. I can stop using [26:53] drugs. I don't know if I can be honest. [26:55] That seems insane. Look at the world we [26:57] live in. Why would anyone be honest? [26:59] That doesn't seem to get you anywhere. [27:01] And [27:02] they were like, yeah, but if you are [27:04] become a liar and you're a compulsive [27:05] liar, you will go back to drinking and [27:07] drugs. That's the way it works. [27:09] So, that was the toughest thing for me. [27:12] And you have to forgive [27:14] yourself. You have to forgive yourself. [27:17] You have to forgive [27:19] other people. You have to make an [27:21] inventory of people you've wronged. You [27:23] have to go to those people and say, I [27:24] apologize for what I've done, for taking [27:27] money from your drawer and using it on [27:30] drugs, for lying to you, for making you [27:33] worry about me. These are all important [27:35] things and you have to do it. And it's [27:37] it's really hard to do, but it's [27:39] important to get over that hump. [27:41] That first stand-up gig [27:43] Yeah. [27:44] did. [27:45] Yeah. [27:45] How did you get on? [27:46] It was an open mic and it was at a [27:48] coffee shop in Long Island in [27:51] place called Merrick. [27:53] Yeah. You were like 25 years old 25 at [27:55] the time? [27:55] I was 25 and [27:57] it was also a tattoo shop. So, you would [27:59] hear like tattoo needles as you if you [28:02] weren't doing well, it would [28:05] And it would just be guys having, you [28:07] know, having their girlfriends like [28:09] tattoos like changed because they were [28:12] no longer in the relationship. So, they [28:14] were like they were making them into [28:15] missiles and like patriotic things or [28:18] 9/11 remembrances, you know, whatever [28:20] the case may be. And occasionally they [28:22] would chuckle and then there was a few [28:24] like local people that liked comedy that [28:26] would come to the coffee house. [28:27] But it was kind of an everybody gets on [28:29] thing. So, that's the beginning of [28:31] comedy is like everyone gets on. It's an [28:32] open mic. You just go and [28:34] you're on. [28:36] And it went well? [28:38] It went as well as it could have gone [28:39] for the first time. I got some laughs. [28:42] Certain things didn't hit. But I felt [28:46] confident and I felt like I belonged, [28:49] and I felt like I was doing the right [28:50] thing. [28:51] And I, for the first time in my life, [28:53] was like [28:55] I I felt [28:58] kind of [29:00] certain that I would keep doing this. [29:04] There was a certainty. [29:05] And [29:07] for the majority of my life [29:09] I wasn't certain of anything. I was kind [29:12] of trying different identities out, [29:15] trying things out seeing what would [29:18] work, and then this this was like, okay, [29:20] this is I'm good at this. I can get [29:22] better at it, and I like it enough to [29:24] work hard at it. [29:25] Comedy Comedy is [29:27] Comedy is an interesting time it appears [29:29] to someone that's not at all involved in [29:31] comedy at all, because you have these [29:33] like these two forces almost colliding [29:35] more so than I've really ever seen in my [29:36] lifetime, which is [29:37] Good and evil. No, I'm kidding. [29:42] No, but it's like correctness and comedy [29:45] Yeah. [29:46] are at war. [29:48] It seems. [29:48] Sure. Well [29:50] And even correctness is now made its way [29:52] onto the stage of comedy. [29:54] Yeah, I I think that [29:57] there is [29:59] always going to be [30:03] taboo subjects. [30:05] There's always going to be things that [30:06] are harder to make funny than other [30:08] things. [30:10] There's always going to be a line. As [30:12] George Carlin said, your job is to find [30:13] out where the line is, cross it, you [30:15] know? [30:16] You got to get good at stuff to make [30:18] people laugh at stuff. I like making [30:20] people laugh at stuff that is inherently [30:22] maybe a little darker cuz of the way I [30:23] grew up. But I got to make sure those [30:26] jokes are funny enough so that people [30:28] will laugh at them. And then there's [30:29] some people that will never laugh at [30:30] them. [30:31] There's some people that don't [30:32] understand comedy. They take it very [30:34] literally. They don't like it. They like [30:37] to be bothered by it. They get angry [30:39] about it. They're unhappy about it. [30:42] Someone's making someone laugh somewhere [30:44] and they're angry. [30:46] I don't know what to do with those [30:48] people. I don't know how much we can pay [30:49] attention to those people. I know many [30:51] of them write articles and you know, you [30:53] know, [30:54] the monologue on television about that [30:56] they're upset about something. I just [30:58] don't know how much attention we've [31:00] paid. We've paid a lot of attention to [31:02] them over the last 4 years. I think [31:03] people are a bit exhausted by it. I [31:05] think people are a bit over it. I think [31:07] there are people in society that they [31:10] they're allowed to have their reactions [31:11] to anything you do. You're allowed to [31:13] hate me, find something I've said [31:15] offensive, disagree with me. You can [31:16] write about it, talk about it, whatever [31:18] you want to do. [31:19] I it's really kind of not my business [31:22] and there's only so much attention that [31:23] I can pay to it. I think that's kind of [31:26] the way comedians have to look at this [31:27] stuff. They go like, "Hey man, [31:29] we're we're making jokes, we're having [31:31] fun. You have the right to be very angry [31:34] about it, be upset about it, but I mean [31:35] again, that's a little crazy in my [31:38] estimation to be that upset [31:40] by comedians that have no real power. [31:43] The thing about comedians, we don't have [31:44] but now people say, "Well, you have [31:46] cultural power, soft power, whatever." [31:48] That's sure, but we don't have the type [31:52] of power that CEOs of large companies [31:55] do. Our job is not to you know, move a [31:58] conversation forward. Our job is not to [32:01] it's Our job's to be funny. Now, [32:03] if we do some other things, if we happen [32:06] to shed light on something that's good, [32:08] if we move a conversation forward, if we [32:10] illustrate a truth, that's a great thing [32:12] and it's secondary. Our primary job is [32:14] to be funny and that can be that's being [32:16] wrong, that's being stupid, that's being [32:20] short-sided. It might be even being [32:21] bigoted if it's funny. [32:24] We're not in the [32:26] we're not in the job of being right. [32:29] We're not in the job of being correct. [32:32] There are people whose jobs are they [32:34] have to be right. A surgeon has to be [32:36] right. They can't just wing it. [32:40] We are in the job of being funny, so if [32:43] you confuse those things, which a lot of [32:44] people out there do, that's where you [32:46] get this tension. [32:48] You know? But again, I'm a clown. I [32:51] perform at comedy clubs and theaters. I [32:53] do a podcast. [32:56] If I say something you don't like, [32:58] there's [33:00] it's really really [33:03] an infinitesimal chance that anything I [33:05] say is really going to have the gravity [33:09] and weight that these people think it [33:11] does. Um you want to be looking at [33:15] other people that have more power. [33:17] Direct that energy somewhere else. [33:21] You say direct that energy somewhere [33:22] else, but I watched that video of you [33:23] getting um very irate because [33:26] Yeah. [33:26] Rogan [33:28] uh [33:28] Yeah. [33:29] he gets canceled and you don't. And you [33:31] say some pretty [33:32] Yes, I try to get canceled. Yes. [33:34] You seem uncancelable in many respects. [33:36] Well, no, no, no, I'm not uncancelable. [33:38] I'm a goofball. I wear crazy glasses. [33:40] I'm a comedian. I say things that [33:42] probably aren't intelligent. And [33:44] sometimes people will look at me and go, [33:47] "That's a good take." A lot of the [33:48] things I say are completely absurd. [33:51] Um and [33:53] I you know, I don't even know which is [33:55] which when I say it. Because I do 2 [33:58] hours of broadcasting. I've done it for [34:00] 8 years. [34:01] And I don't know what I'm going to say [34:03] until I sit down and I talk. And some of [34:07] the things I say that are absurd start [34:10] intelligently. And some of the things I [34:12] say that are intelligent maybe start [34:13] absurdly. [34:15] And that's the fun of it to me. If I [34:17] knew what I was going to say or if I had [34:18] an agenda, if I wanted to say a certain [34:20] thing, I would get very bored very [34:22] quickly. But I just try to look at stuff [34:24] and go, "What do I think? What do I [34:26] think? I'm being told this. [34:28] You know, what what's my reaction, you [34:30] know?" [34:32] And that's kind of like what I try to [34:34] do. But yeah, I think I'm I'm goofy and [34:37] if people are mad at me, they're kind of [34:38] they're they look stupid sometimes [34:41] because of how over the top I am about [34:44] certain things and how wild and And [34:46] again, a lot of it I think is funny. [34:48] Right? So Joe has a different podcast. [34:50] He has like a He has a podcast where [34:52] it's sometimes it's funny, but he has [34:53] very serious people on. He has the [34:55] biggest podcast, I think, in the world. [34:56] I think you guys are maybe the second. [34:59] Right? Are you [35:00] I have no idea. I have no idea. [35:01] You have no idea. Okay. Clever. [35:04] You know, like he's hugely [35:07] successful and he, you know, does all [35:09] these really amazing interviews where he [35:11] researches and he reads books and he's [35:14] smart and he's talking to somebody and [35:16] I'm like shooting from the hip. I'm just [35:19] going off the top of my head and like [35:21] halfway through a story I'll go, "Oh, [35:23] no." And I'll just go the other way on [35:25] it because I'll realize I'll Sometimes [35:27] I'll read the third paragraph. I'll be [35:28] dismissing the whole thing and then when [35:29] I get to the third paragraph I go, "Oh, [35:31] this is a problem." [35:32] So it it is and that's what I think [35:34] makes it funny. [35:37] Joe Rogan? [35:37] Yeah. [35:38] Um going on his show, you you described [35:40] that as being really pivotal for you in [35:41] your career. [35:42] Yeah. [35:43] He's the most generous person that I've [35:45] met with his audience, with his fan [35:47] base. All he wants is other people to [35:48] succeed. He brings on comedians, he [35:51] brings on writers, he brings on [35:52] journalists. [35:53] He helps them promote whatever they're [35:54] doing. He has this huge fan base. He [35:57] shares it with people. So I'm very lucky [35:59] that he He's had me on the show a bunch [36:01] of times and he's a very good friend and [36:02] like when I go on the show, we just have [36:04] the conversation that we would have [36:06] privately, we have it on the show. So I [36:08] think that's why people like it. [36:09] Podcasting? [36:10] Yeah. [36:11] It's I mean, it's taken on a life of its [36:12] own. What do you think of podcasting? I [36:14] mean, it's been on a bit of a journey. [36:15] Obviously, there's [36:16] there was this big I think podcasting [36:18] was like the OGs of podcasting like [36:19] Rogan started out and then [36:21] Adam Carolla, Joe Rogan. [36:22] Yeah, and then there's [36:23] Ethan the Girl Show in New York City, [36:25] Marc Maron, and guys were in the very, [36:27] very early. Before it was cool, before [36:29] anyone was really like before the money [36:30] was there, and then the celebrities show [36:32] up. It was like a bit of an experiment [36:34] for a couple of years. It seems Spotify [36:35] have kind of rolled back from that [36:36] experiment. [36:36] Yes, because they have nothing to say. [36:38] Um most celebrities don't. A lot of them [36:41] you know are invented people who are [36:44] created in a laboratory. The laboratory [36:46] is CAA, um my agency. [36:50] And uh and they create a person and they [36:52] get public relations people, they get [36:54] lawyers, they get all these people, [36:56] business managers, agents. They come in [36:58] and they go, "This is who you are. This [37:00] is what plays. These are the things you [37:02] highlight about your past. These are the [37:03] things we don't talk about. Let's leave [37:05] the Confederate flag at home." You know, [37:07] they create a person. That person then [37:09] goes and they're now famous. [37:11] Um it's a terrible idea to give that [37:13] person a microphone and tell them to [37:15] talk for an hour. It's terrible. You [37:17] know, many of these people aren't that [37:19] talented. Some of them are. Some of them [37:21] are amazingly talented. Some of them are [37:22] very very kind of banal people. [37:25] People tend to think of Hollywood as [37:26] this place where it's all satanic [37:28] pedophiles eating children. Now, [37:30] undoubtedly some of that is true, but a [37:33] lot of it is just very banal, boring [37:35] people that have been created by these [37:37] corporations that [37:40] when you realize how boring they are and [37:43] then you look at how much money they [37:44] have and where they live, that's what [37:46] will drive you nuts. You'll go, "Oh my [37:47] god." So, that's why podcasting is a [37:49] really, really bad idea for these [37:52] people. They should be kept somewhere. [37:55] They should have very managed things [37:57] where they come out on the red carpet [37:59] and they go, "How are you doing?" and [38:01] they just go, "Climate change." and then [38:03] walk into the auditorium and get an [38:05] award. They should be allowed to speak [38:07] two to three words at once, and they [38:09] should know what those words are [38:10] beforehand. Um it is a terrible idea to [38:13] give someone again these people that all [38:17] of their interactions are with other [38:19] famous people. All of their thoughts are [38:22] filtered through a prism of [38:25] you know, corporate lawyers before they [38:27] can say anything. [38:28] This is not what podcasting is in my [38:30] estimation. [38:31] Is there any celebrity podcast that you [38:33] think is [38:33] I'm sure there's some that are really [38:34] good. This is not everyone, right? I'm [38:37] sure there are people that have really [38:38] good podcasts, but like if we're just [38:40] talking in general about let's give [38:43] A-list actors a microphone, probably not [38:46] the best idea. She's probably not the [38:49] best idea, you know? [38:51] What's your um [38:52] Cuz I know they they get Meghan Markle [38:53] money, they gave they give a lot of [38:54] people money. [38:56] There [38:57] at Spotify. And you know, [38:59] and I don't know that that but that then [39:02] they came out and said we made a [39:02] mistake. [39:04] We shouldn't have given these people [39:05] money. [39:06] Do you think you should have gotten the [39:07] money instead? [39:08] Of course. [39:09] I absolutely believe that. [39:12] But you know, I [39:15] I I can't compel them to give me the [39:18] money. [39:20] I can't compel them. I can't get a [39:22] member of the royal family to marry me [39:25] and I would have stayed in that castle [39:26] no matter what was said. [39:29] And but I can't have that happen. So I [39:30] can't you know, Oprah doesn't interview [39:32] me. So you got you you I have enough [39:34] money. But the um sure, you know, I I [39:37] think it's podcasting to me the fun of [39:39] podcasting is being unfiltered free and [39:41] just having fun. [39:42] What's your assessment of these sort of [39:44] different generations? We have these Gen [39:46] Zs, millennials, and we have the [39:48] boomers. What's your read on [39:50] Well, we've given up on the children. [39:52] The future is not the children. The [39:54] children are no longer the future. The [39:55] future is AI. The future is robotics. [39:58] We're very clear on that. We don't even [40:00] talk about the children anymore. We talk [40:01] mainly about AI. No one's even said [40:03] anything about the children in months, [40:05] years really. Oh, we've given up on the [40:07] children. They're dead-eyed little [40:08] monsters. They're running around killing [40:10] each other. We can't deal with it. It's [40:11] very traumatic. I've even stopped [40:13] thinking about what they're doing cuz [40:15] it's crazy. I'm more excited about AI [40:18] than the children, just like anyone [40:19] else. [40:20] Who's reviving the economy of San [40:22] Francisco? The children? No, AI. [40:24] So, AI's next. We don't know what we're [40:26] going to do with the children. Build [40:27] prisons, that's what I say, for [40:29] children. [40:30] Um they're crazy. [40:32] Um they're being raised by algorithms. [40:33] They're all on fentanyl, they're all on [40:35] drugs, they're all running around trying [40:36] to kill each other, and and record it. [40:39] Um there was a case in Phoenix, Arizona, [40:41] these rich white kids running around [40:42] beating up kids at random, filming it [40:45] and putting it on TikTok. No motive, [40:47] nothing. Just for clout, just for being [40:49] sick. And they killed a kid, and [40:52] finally, now cuz they're all white, of [40:53] course, the cops didn't do anything for [40:55] a year, and they were like, "Whoa, yeah, [40:56] yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, [40:57] yeah, yeah, yeah, just a couple of kids [40:58] having fun killing other kids. This is [41:01] HOW PEOPLE GROW UP." SO, this Gilbert, [41:03] Arizona Police Department does nothing [41:04] about the whole thing. Finally, they [41:06] just arrested these kids cuz they they [41:07] killed somebody. [41:08] But this is not only there, I mean, it's [41:11] kind of an epidemic where like [41:13] all over the place, you see like, you [41:15] know, young people, unfortunately, [41:18] you know, these crazy acts of violence [41:20] that are now being uploaded for clout. [41:22] People going, "Look at what I did." And [41:24] what they did was like, [41:26] you know, assault someone or kill [41:27] someone. This is a real problem. [41:29] Um [41:30] so, we have to deal with the kids in [41:31] some way. Jail them, put I don't know [41:33] what to do with them. [41:34] But AI's big, robotics is big, that's [41:37] what is next. The boomers, I have a book [41:39] coming out about them. I love the [41:41] boomers, they're a selfish generation uh [41:44] uh of people. It the the the the the the [41:47] the state of the boomers, these these [41:49] paranoid people who refuse to leave [41:51] their McMansions. They will not leave, [41:53] they will not retire. [41:55] Uh they lord around their houses. Uh [41:57] they they they uh diminish their [41:59] children. They say, "I can't believe you [42:00] don't own something like this." They [42:02] like holding these houses over their [42:04] kids' heads. Um they retired at bigger [42:06] houses. They have thousands and [42:08] thousands of square feet. They're very [42:09] sick people. They refuse to give up [42:12] their jobs. or dying in the Senate, [42:13] they're collapsing in Congress. They [42:15] will not leave. Uh they will not cede [42:17] any of their power. They're emotional [42:20] terrorists. [42:21] Uh and uh [42:23] and I grew up with them, they're very [42:24] interesting people. They they've proven [42:26] the lie of the '60s. These hippies that [42:28] everybody thought were like progressive, [42:30] they're actually not. They were always [42:31] just selfish drug addicts. They never [42:33] cared about uh anything they purported [42:36] to care about. They just wanted to get [42:37] high and roll around in the mud. And [42:40] then as soon as the drugs changed from, [42:42] you know, uh whatever from uh you know, [42:45] acid to money, uh they, you know, became [42:48] this very like materialistic, soulless [42:51] group of people, but the funniest [42:53] generation that has ever lived. Nobody's [42:55] funnier. Nobody's funnier because to be [42:57] funny, like we talked about, you kind of [42:59] have to just not care about anything. [43:01] And there's no generation of people that [43:04] have cared less about the future of this [43:06] planet, about their children, about [43:08] anything than the boomers. Uh they're [43:11] all little islands and they all are [43:13] about themselves forever and ever. [43:15] There's something actually refreshing [43:17] about that, funny. Um and they're [43:20] holding the planet hostage. They won't [43:21] die, they won't leave. I've suggested [43:23] they be forcibly evicted from their [43:25] homes and committed to mental [43:26] institutions. Legally, we have some [43:28] problems. That's not easy to do. Um I've [43:30] spoken to some lawyers. There are [43:32] problems doing that. Um and then the [43:34] millennials were this very shitty [43:35] generation of like pin a medal on me, [43:38] pin a ribbon on me, I'm right, I went to [43:41] the right college, I got the right [43:42] internship, I believe the right things, [43:44] I tweeted the right thing, I did the [43:46] right thing, I have all the right [43:47] beliefs, I have the good politics, I [43:49] have this. Shower me with you tell me [43:51] I'm good cuz my boomer parents, they [43:53] don't care about me, but you tell me I'm [43:55] good. The world needs to fill the void [43:57] that exists inside of me. Uh and these [43:59] millennials are these kind of ambitious [44:01] people that uh want to constantly be [44:04] patted on the back and told how great [44:06] they are. So, they're kind of [44:08] shapeshifters that conform to any [44:11] popular sentiment. They crowdsource all [44:13] of their opinions. They just want [44:14] Where's the boomers just kind of didn't [44:16] care about anyone or anything. You have [44:18] the millennials who are [44:21] kind of like more like I am good and you [44:24] tell me that I'm good because they're [44:25] not They're good to be told to be good. [44:27] Their politics are aesthetic. They want [44:29] everyone to look at them and to tell [44:31] them how great they are. And then the [44:32] zoomers are the younger generation after [44:35] the millennials. They seem to be [44:38] you know, somewhat like they're [44:39] self-starters. They're very skeptical of [44:41] institutions. They're a little more [44:43] cynical. That's some of their positive [44:45] qualities that they're more [44:46] independent-minded. The negative [44:48] qualities are the aforementioned [44:50] um [44:51] murder and the filming of the murders [44:53] and the killings and the drugs and the [44:56] fentanyl vapes and all of that. That [44:58] seems to be less [45:00] I mean, we need a draft, to be honest. [45:03] You know, now that I'm kind of older and [45:04] uh [45:05] fat, now we need a draft. Young people [45:08] should probably just go into the [45:10] military. I I I I've I know that's going [45:13] to be a controversial thing to say, but [45:14] if they're just going to do fentanyl and [45:16] attack each other in malls and put it on [45:18] TikTok, they can go die in the Ukraine [45:20] so that Bowen can make some money. [45:24] Are we still on YouTube? [45:27] So, you um would you consider yourself [45:29] to be optimistic about the future? [45:31] There's a lot going on in the world. [45:32] No. [45:33] No, I I I I don't I don't I I'm I'm [45:35] sane. [45:37] So, I don't I don't I I think there's [45:38] good things happening, but I mean, [45:39] optimistic about the future overall, I [45:41] don't know. That's tough to be, maybe, [45:43] right? [45:44] I mean, you've got you've got elections [45:45] coming up this year as well here in the [45:46] US [45:47] Well, we all know elections solve [45:48] everything. [45:52] We all know that's where the real power [45:53] lies, the elections. Now, yeah. [45:56] When you were talking about refusing to [45:58] relinquish control and power, the boomer [45:59] generation, I was thinking a lot about [46:00] Biden there. [46:01] Sure. [46:01] Cuz it seems like your presidents are [46:03] getting older and older and refusing to [46:05] Yeah, I mean Biden seems to be a bit [46:08] old. Trump's old, you know, Biden just [46:10] seems to be at a a stage of mental [46:11] decline though. He was really good at [46:13] the State of the Union. They gave him [46:15] something they shot him up with [46:16] something, which is great. Uh we have no [46:18] new talent in the country. [46:20] Uh nobody wants to be a politician [46:22] anymore unless they're psychotic. [46:24] You need young people that care about [46:27] the country [46:28] and that want to change it. And what [46:30] you're getting now more and more is you [46:33] know, all of the interesting people in [46:36] our country are and and the people that [46:38] are ambitious and the people that have [46:39] talent, they don't want to be in [46:41] politics. They want to be somewhere [46:43] else. It's more fun to go to Miami and [46:45] trade Bitcoin on a yacht. You know what [46:48] I mean? They just don't want to be in [46:50] politics. They don't want to do it. [46:53] So you end up with these octogenarian [46:56] uh drooling [46:58] somewhat [46:59] uh you know, like dementia-ridden [47:04] elderly people who are [47:08] incapable of even understanding what's [47:10] happening in the cuz they don't even [47:11] know what it is. They barely know what [47:13] Tik Tok is. Tik Tok is something their [47:15] grandchild shows them [47:17] you know, at some party they're having [47:19] in Maine. They're sitting on a on a hill [47:21] in Maine eating lobsters falling out of [47:23] their mouth. They go, "Look grandpa, [47:24] look at the Tik Tok." They go, "Ah." And [47:26] then they have to then go into Congress [47:28] and and hash this out. You know, so I [47:30] mean the problem really is we just don't [47:31] have young people that care enough about [47:33] the country because the press is going [47:35] to rip their lives apart, right? They're [47:38] going there's so much more money [47:39] elsewhere. Uh there's so much more and [47:42] the system's so toxic and so corrupt [47:44] they go, "I don't want to get involved [47:45] in that." [47:46] They're going to ban Tik Tok, aren't [47:47] they? They're talking a lot about [47:48] banning [47:48] They're talking about it. I have no [47:50] followers on it so I'm I'm for the ban. [47:53] You know, for personal completely [47:55] personal reasons I'm for the and I also [47:57] think it's probably it's I don't know. I [47:59] don't know anything about it. I I just [48:00] know that people are making a lot of [48:01] money on it and so if I say I'm for the [48:03] ban, people get angry with me. [48:05] It's not a good It's not a good cultural [48:07] force. But what is? [48:09] Do you have [48:11] goals [48:12] in terms of your comedy and your career [48:14] more generally? Do you have like stated [48:15] goals? [48:16] Yeah, I have things I want to do. I have [48:18] You know the boomer thing I want to do a [48:20] show about boomers. I've always wanted [48:21] to. The book is going to be a large part [48:23] of that. I want to do either a movie or [48:24] a show. There's something I find it very [48:27] funny the way I grew up. My friends' [48:29] families, their parents were very funny [48:31] people. [48:32] And I want to do something that kind of [48:35] immortalizes that cuz they are going to [48:37] about to leave. They're about to go. And [48:39] there's something very funny about them [48:41] and I want to make something about I [48:43] think a lot of comedians, maybe everyone [48:45] wants to do something about their [48:47] childhood or do something about how they [48:49] grew up or but you know, I mine will be [48:53] good. That would be the difference. No, [48:54] I I really like the idea of that. That's [48:56] a goal. Just to tell that story is a [48:58] goal. I'm banging on the desk. I [49:00] apologize. [49:01] Um [49:02] And then it's just to keep making people [49:04] laugh and to keep having fun. You know, [49:07] I mean all the things that I [49:10] There's certain that that boomer story [49:11] is something I want to tell. You got to [49:13] find the right platform for the right [49:15] medium, but that's something I want to [49:17] do. [49:18] The um the the all those early [49:20] experiences that you've had have quite [49:22] clearly manifested in your work in [49:23] various ways. You talked about the [49:26] unprocessed trauma from your earliest [49:27] years. [49:28] Yes. [49:29] Have you processed it? [49:30] No. No, I mean I I I processed some of [49:32] it. [49:33] Some of it. I mean, I don't know that I [49:35] processed all of it. I don't in in one [49:38] lifetime it's a tough thing to process [49:39] all of it. But I processed a good amount [49:42] of it. And I've come to a point where [49:46] there's always more work to do. You can [49:49] always be in a better place mentally and [49:51] you should try that. [49:53] Try to get there. [49:55] But, I think I've done a good job of [49:58] processing it. I lost my mother about 6 [50:00] months ago. [50:01] I think. [50:03] I don't know. It was August died in [50:05] August, maybe maybe 6 months. [50:07] Um and [50:10] it was a very difficult thing to go [50:11] through because the the her life was not [50:15] great at the end, but it was in the [50:16] beginning. She had a lovely amazing life [50:19] in the beginning. Her and my father were [50:20] married for 10 years before they had me. [50:22] She loved surfing and boating, and she [50:24] spent a lot of time in Florida, and she [50:25] was kind of she was voted best looking [50:27] in her high school. She was very very [50:29] attractive early on. The front nine were [50:31] good. The back nine were a little tough. [50:33] But, I had her out to my house um on [50:36] Long Island, and the whole family was [50:38] kind of there. We had a really nice day [50:40] of everybody, my cousins, my her sister, [50:44] everybody being there, and that was a a [50:48] good moment. That's what I'm [50:50] remembering, [50:52] and it was, you know, she was as good as [50:55] she could be. [50:56] Um I I try to get more [50:59] religious as I get older and more faith. [51:01] I I think faith is a good thing to have. [51:04] Um you know, obviously, [51:06] religion being a human institution, [51:07] there's there's pitfalls, there's [51:09] problems. You know, we don't have to [51:10] rehash them. [51:11] Um [51:13] The idea of there being a spiritual [51:15] realm to me is [51:17] I think [51:18] very [51:20] interesting. I think it seems to be [51:22] quite possible. I think that [51:26] people are more than their bodies, [51:30] they're more than the flesh, they're [51:32] more than there is a spirit there, and I [51:34] think there was a spirit in my mother [51:36] that was trapped [51:38] in a very difficult situation, and I [51:42] think that spirit is free. And I think [51:44] that's the way that I feel about a lot [51:48] of things now is that I seem to be [51:50] getting more [51:52] into this idea of [51:55] you know, the physical not being [51:57] everything. [51:58] And that we we should develop a [52:00] spiritual side of ourselves. And [52:04] I'm I I I look at the struggles that she [52:07] had later on in her life. [52:09] And I was like keeping her in a body and [52:11] in a mind [52:13] that is actively fighting against her [52:16] was a selfish thing. So, letting her [52:19] having her be free, I think is is the [52:21] best you know, outcome. [52:24] It's a complex set of feelings. [52:26] It is. [52:28] Because there's grief on one end and [52:29] then there's something else on the [52:30] other, right? There's like a [52:31] Well, there's relief because she was in [52:33] pain. So, when someone's in pain and [52:35] they depart [52:37] uh this world, you are there's a relief [52:40] that you have because watching them go [52:43] through that [52:44] is terrible. It's hard. And this is [52:47] people that suffer in all kinds of ways. [52:49] So, [52:50] you know, again, I think people are more [52:52] than their bodies. And you know, I think [52:54] they are you know, the the soul I [52:55] believe is a real thing. I believe the [52:56] spirit is real. And I was raised [52:58] Catholic. There's parts of the [53:00] Catholicism I don't [53:01] vibe with as much, obviously, the [53:03] terrible lineage of abuses. [53:05] Uh but then there's parts of it that I [53:06] think are really good. Having a [53:07] spiritual dimension to your life, I [53:10] think is really good. So, you know, I I [53:13] look at it and I would never say like it [53:15] was time. [53:17] But she had suffered greatly [53:19] for a while and having her out of the [53:22] house and having her [53:25] be with everybody kind of for the last [53:27] time. Nobody knew she was going to die, [53:28] but like that was just kind of a moment [53:30] where I think she might have felt like [53:31] it was okay to let go. I don't know if [53:33] that's true or not. [53:34] Have you Have you been to therapy? To [53:36] process [53:37] I've been, yeah. I'm not in it currently [53:39] um [53:40] because I'm on tour, but I and I haven't [53:41] been in it in a bit, but I I certainly [53:43] have. And I think it can be very good. [53:46] I've been to therapy. [53:47] Yeah, it can also not be good. [53:49] Yeah, it can also be Yeah. [53:50] It can also not be good. But it can be [53:53] good. [53:53] Cuz you presumably you want to have your [53:56] own family someday. [53:58] I'm presuming. [53:59] Perhaps, yeah. I mean, I don't know. [54:00] I've done I've done a lot of career [54:03] stuff for a very long time, and I think [54:04] it the age I'm at in your late 30s, you [54:06] kind of start realizing that there's [54:09] just a ceiling [54:10] not even career-wise, but in how happy [54:13] it'll make you. [54:15] So, [54:16] my career might get a lot better, [54:19] uh but the [54:22] the amount of joy you derive from [54:26] accomplishments [54:28] as you get older starts to dim, and you [54:30] actually start enjoying other people's [54:32] accomplishments. You start looking [54:33] around, community makes you happy, being [54:36] involved in things makes you happy, um [54:39] helping people makes you happy. It [54:41] starts to shift if you are, you know, on [54:45] a good path. I think you start to shift [54:46] from like, "Me, me, me, look what I've [54:48] done." to like, "Hey, can I help [54:51] somebody?" or can I be part of something [54:54] that has a value? [54:56] What's the the biggest side of you that [54:58] your audience don't un- [54:59] don't understand or don't know? [55:01] Um [55:02] Cuz I've watched you for years, and I [55:03] think I've watched a one dimension of [55:05] you. [55:06] Yes. A funny one, hopefully. [55:08] A really funny one, but [55:09] that, you know, I think ev- everyone [55:12] that they watch, me as well, um is a [55:15] human being and not [55:17] always on all the time. And I think [55:20] that, you know, there there's a [55:22] dimension of me that you get on the [55:23] show, there's a dimension of a lot of [55:25] And you get a lot of what I think on the [55:27] show. Like, if you went out to dinner [55:29] with me, I And the things that I'm [55:32] saying on the show are what I would say [55:33] there. Like, I I [55:35] I'm not going to have an opinion on the [55:36] show and then sit down and go, "Well, [55:39] actually this is the way I really feel." [55:40] Everything you hear is what I think and [55:42] some of it's really funny, some of it's [55:43] not. Um but I think it's just like just [55:47] a dimension of like [55:48] being a human being [55:50] apart from being a product, right? Where [55:52] people just consume [55:54] the things you're saying and doing. [55:56] A lot of people probably didn't know [55:59] so a lot of this. Some of them did [56:00] because I'm pretty open about it, but [56:01] like you know, I think that a lot of [56:03] people just see one side of you where [56:06] here's a guy who makes everything funny [56:07] or tries to make everything funny, but [56:09] then there are a lot of things too [56:10] where, you know, I have interests that [56:12] aren't comedy, I have interests that are [56:14] not you know, my career, I have [56:17] interests that are not and I like to [56:21] you know, you know, talk about the [56:22] spirituality stuff. That's probably [56:24] something that I don't talk about. [56:27] Maybe I'll bring it up as like an aside, [56:29] but there are interests that I have that [56:31] are varied, but for whatever reason I'm [56:33] like it's not funny or it doesn't fit [56:36] the show that I'm doing. So, there's a [56:38] show and then there's a person, right? [56:40] That's not me, that's every entertainer [56:42] everywhere. [56:43] Your show at the Royal Albert Hall [56:45] that's coming up, it's in a couple of [56:46] days time. [56:47] Yeah. [56:47] Um one of the things that I I'm always [56:50] shocked by with you and you've said it [56:52] earlier is that when you do your podcast [56:53] or when you do these sort of long long [56:55] long form bits, it appears that you're [56:56] basically freestyling. [56:58] Yeah. [56:59] Uh what's going through your head? Like [57:00] I've always wondered [57:01] Yeah. [57:02] when if you're sat on Rogan or if you're [57:03] sat on your podcast and you know, your [57:05] producer pulls up some article [57:06] Right. [57:07] do you just kind of trust [57:08] Yes. [57:09] that you'll [ __ ] [57:10] I It's what I used to do when I was a [57:11] drunk. I would sit at a bar and talk and [57:13] now I just do that without alcohol. Like [57:15] I I've I I like looking at things and [57:19] trying to figure out what's going on and [57:21] trying to make them funny and that's the [57:24] value and the service that I provide is [57:25] like here's a landscape of stories and [57:29] articles and things and [57:32] what the hell's going on and let let's [57:34] see if we can make it funny and let's [57:37] see if we can understand it on a deeper [57:38] level because there's so you know the [57:40] press has all these agendas about like [57:42] what they want you to believe all over [57:44] the place left-wing right-wing whatever [57:46] centrist corporate just buy things [57:48] whatever it is. [57:49] And what I like to do is look at them [57:51] and go well maybe there's a dimension [57:53] here that's more human that I can flesh [57:57] out because I'm looking at it and I [57:59] don't have an agenda. I don't care [58:02] either way. I'm not sponsored by [58:05] the person in this article. I don't have [58:07] a alliance or an allegiance to anything. [58:10] I'm looking at it and going like what's [58:12] the funniest take and how does this [58:14] you know how how does this explain [58:16] something larger that's going on? That's [58:18] interesting to me. That's fun to me. I [58:20] like doing that. So I think it's been [58:22] successful because I enjoy it. [58:25] You came out as gay at roughly sort of [58:26] 25 years old during the period of your [58:28] time during that period of your life. [58:29] late by today's standards. Most people [58:32] statistically today come out at the age [58:35] of two. [58:40] You came [58:41] So where do you fit love into all of [58:42] this? [58:43] You try to fit it as as in into it as as [58:47] much as you can. You know you try to you [58:49] got to you know it's hard because you [58:51] travel a lot and it's hard because you [58:54] are spending a lot of time doing the [58:56] things that are benefiting you in one [58:59] part of your life but sometimes that [59:00] hurts another part of your life. [59:02] So you try to and again like once you [59:05] start [59:06] like you know having success it's so a [59:09] lot of comics like marry other comedians [59:12] or somebody in that world who gets it [59:15] who understands it. [59:17] So [59:19] you know I think [59:20] you know that's been something I've seen [59:22] and and that works a lot of times. Like [59:24] people really happy and bring up great [59:26] families kind of in the world of comedy [59:28] because their partner gets it. But, for [59:30] me I I don't know if that's going to I [59:32] don't want that really. I would like [59:34] somebody who's completely like not [59:36] involved with this at all. [59:37] You dating? [59:38] Yeah, but not in not one person in like [59:41] a serious way. [59:43] You know? Like you just around and you [59:45] know kind of meeting people and seeing [59:46] like what's fun. [59:48] Have you ever been [59:49] Homosexuality is slightly different. So, [59:51] it's not like a whole You know what I [59:52] mean? It's not the royal wedding per se. [59:55] It's not like moving to the castle. But, [59:57] maybe one day, you know? [60:00] Have you ever been in a long-term [60:01] relationship or serious one? [60:02] On and off, but not not serious where [60:04] it's like again like it's going to lead [60:06] to marriage and children. There is kind [60:08] of that difference where like [60:10] you know, not that gay people can get [60:12] married and have kids. They can and have [60:13] and blah blah blah. We know that. But, [60:16] I personally have not been in a [60:17] relationship where it was like this is [60:20] where it's going. And I think it's a lot [60:21] of it is because I was just so hyper [60:23] focused on like trying to figure out a [60:26] way [60:27] to do this really hard thing, which was [60:29] like be a comedian. But, you know, now I [60:31] think I'm more open to that stuff [60:33] because like I said, you know, you do [60:34] some stuff and do some cool stuff and [60:36] then you like want to enlarge those [60:37] other parts of your life that you've [60:38] neglected. [60:39] I was the same for most of my life, but [60:42] I actually think when I look back I just [60:43] had [60:45] I think the first model of what love is [60:46] you learn from observing your parents. [60:48] Yeah, uh-oh. Yeah, but you're right. [60:50] You know, and then you go okay, this is [60:52] this is love. Okay, so this man this [60:53] woman how do they interact? And then you [60:55] grow up and you go that never leaves [60:57] your brain and you think is that what I [60:58] want? [60:59] That's right. That's right. That's [61:01] right. Yeah, it is it is not But, you're [61:04] right and a lot of it is an excuse when [61:07] when I go oh, it's all the it's all the [61:09] career. That's me being kind of a [61:11] selfish person that you I needed to be [61:14] selfish to figure out a way to like get [61:17] to where I wanted to go. [61:19] But, you know, I could have made more [61:20] time, but I didn't, right? So, it's [61:22] like, you know, you battle a lot in life [61:24] with like the things you want, the [61:25] things you think you want. You know, [61:28] it's kind of you want the thing, you [61:29] want the nice stuff, you want the nice [61:31] cars, you want the nice things, but then [61:33] you realize that the things you really [61:35] like are the things that you feel drawn [61:38] to and you feel drawn to obviously [61:41] making people laugh, but you also feel [61:42] drawn to being, you know, in a like a [61:46] situation where you're being [61:47] appreciated, loved, and, you know, [61:50] taken care of. [61:51] What do you love about yourself? [61:52] My ability to do it and keep doing it [61:55] and like I don't I'm not an excuse [61:58] person. I don't uh I you know, I I take [62:01] rejection and I I kind of [62:03] move on pretty quickly. I've done that [62:05] since I'm a kid. [62:07] Uh I have a lot of the qualities that a [62:09] lot of the YouTube uh guys try to not [62:13] not the go to the gym every day and do [62:15] this and do that, obviously, but like I [62:17] don't let someone tell me something's [62:20] not going to happen. I'll just keep [62:22] going until I figure out a way to make [62:24] it happen on my terms and I like that [62:27] about myself at all. [62:28] Uh [62:29] you know, I like that about myself a [62:30] lot. I think that that's a good quality [62:32] to have. Growing up the way I grew up, [62:35] there's a version of me that's just a [62:36] druggy, that's just on the street, [62:38] that's dead, that is blaming everyone [62:42] else for every other thing, that's [62:44] talking about how, you know, whatever. [62:47] So many people [62:49] had it so much harder than me. Right? I [62:52] had a mom that was sick and, you know, a [62:54] dad that was maybe not as involved as [62:56] maybe he could have been, but they're [62:57] both really good people. Both very [63:00] supportive of me. The drugs were [63:02] something that I did. That, you know [63:04] what I mean? Like, so many people grow [63:05] up in genuinely abusive environments. [63:09] And they succeed wildly. So, I'm [63:12] inspired by people like that. So, I'm [63:14] not trying to say like it's woe is me or [63:15] anything, but like I did come from a an [63:18] environment and I do have that thing in [63:21] me. We all do. Where I could just [63:23] offload everything and say, "Hey, I [63:26] didn't get what I wanted. It wasn't a [63:28] perfect scenario. I'm going to use drugs [63:30] for the rest of my life. I'm going to [63:32] mismanage my money. I'm going to go [63:34] broke. I'm going to, you know, blame [63:37] everybody else." I could have been that [63:38] guy. I was that guy for many years and I [63:41] know who that guy is. [63:43] I'm happy I was able to get rid of that. [63:45] That doesn't mean the guy that I am now [63:46] is a perfect person. Not at all. There's [63:50] a whole host of other problems you have [63:52] once you get rid of that guy. But, I'm [63:54] glad I got rid of that guy. [63:56] And what are you working on now over [63:57] there? [63:58] I mean, everything. Eating better, [64:00] sleeping better, [64:03] spending more time with people, going on [64:05] dates and listening to actually what [64:07] people say. You know, even if they're [64:09] terribly uninteresting as most of them [64:10] are, right? But, you have to, you know, [64:13] bless them. You have to God bless them. [64:14] They're children of God. You have to [64:15] just kind of listen and you did you [64:17] majored marketing? [64:19] So, you know, you do but but all that [64:21] stuff and I'm obviously I'm I'm kidding, [64:22] but like, all the stuff that human [64:24] beings have to do. Their mental, [64:26] physical health. [64:28] Uh, you know, the way they balance their [64:31] lives. It's it's all Once you sober up, [64:34] it's not like, "Wow, the journey's [64:36] done." It's like, "Wow, the journey can [64:38] actually begin and I can learn how to [64:40] negotiate all this stuff as a human [64:41] being." And you fail all the time [64:44] across the board. But, what you don't do [64:47] is you don't start using drugs, you [64:49] don't start drinking, you don't start [64:50] becoming a pathological liar, you don't [64:52] start doing the things that you used to [64:55] do when you were out there, [64:57] you know, being the worst version of [64:59] yourself. [65:00] Coping mechanisms. [65:01] Yeah. [65:02] Mental health coping mechanisms. What [65:04] should What's How is your mental health [65:05] and what are your new sort of mechanisms [65:08] for managing mental health? [65:10] Well, I it's just I think it's good. I'm [65:12] a comedian, so it can't be great. If it [65:14] was great, I [65:15] wouldn't have became a comedian [65:17] probably. Um [65:19] I think talking to people, you know, [65:21] taking long walks, again, helping [65:24] people, enlarging your life, your [65:27] spiritual life, trying to be a better [65:28] person [65:30] is is what everyone should do all the [65:32] time. I think that's what I try to do. I [65:34] try not to get too caught up in [65:36] you know, the insanity of the world of [65:40] spending too much time online, looking [65:42] at the internet too much, you know, not [65:45] being around real people, being in your [65:47] head, obsessing about things you can't [65:49] control. All of that, if you can if you [65:51] can find ways [65:53] to not watch the murders on TikTok and [65:55] go somewhere else and just sit on a [65:57] beach or take a walk or do something, [65:59] it's much better for your mental health [66:02] than just watching [66:03] this parade of insanity. You know, I [66:06] It's fun to do. I do it sometimes. I [66:08] have to do it as part of my show. But I [66:10] think if you can get away from it, I As [66:12] I get older, I spend less time online. I [66:14] grew up without it. And then it became [66:17] your life. And now, if you spend less [66:19] time on it, [66:20] I actually think you look at it as, "Oh, [66:22] this is something I do for my career." [66:23] But then you actually have a real life. [66:25] You can read a book and go somewhere. [66:27] Like that to me has more value now than [66:30] just scrolling and the endless That That [66:33] to me is a recipe for unhappiness. We [66:36] know it, too. All these young kids, we [66:39] know how bad it is. We know how bad the [66:40] effects of a lot of this stuff are, and [66:41] we will lie about it. And all these tech [66:43] companies are like, "There's no [66:44] correlation between the mass suicide and [66:48] my new app, which tells them how to do [66:50] it." Like there's no No, there's no You [66:52] know, they have a new app, suicider. [66:54] They're like, "That has nothing to do [66:55] with that." Um you know, it's like, you [66:58] know, [66:59] uh just filters which you can kill [67:01] yourself. They're like, "Oh, that has [67:02] nothing to do with what's happening. [67:04] It's for entertainment, and the kids [67:06] know it." So, we know how bad this stuff [67:08] is. We know how toxic it is. [67:11] Um we're seeing it with young people now [67:13] the way we've never seen it before. [67:15] And uh [67:16] you know, so I think [67:18] that's another thing. Your mental health [67:20] can be really dramatically improved if [67:23] you [67:24] have a human human interaction. [67:27] Elon obviously bought Twitter, and that [67:29] seems to have kind of balanced the [67:30] scales in terms of giving [67:33] you know, one could call it free speech, [67:34] but another outlet for people to just [67:36] speak in a more uncensored, free way [67:38] without [67:39] Are you Are you happy that he he bought [67:41] I think it was good. Yeah, I mean, [67:42] listen, Twitter had become a really [67:48] unfortunate example of censorship in [67:53] American society. [67:55] Twitter itself, you know, as a a thing [67:57] is not [67:59] a holistic thing. It never was. It was [68:01] always this kind of battleground where [68:03] people would just be crazy and, you [68:05] know, fight with each other and this [68:06] that and the other thing. I don't know [68:07] that it is, you know, people say it's [68:09] the town square. It might be. I don't [68:11] know if it is. [68:13] Uh I think it's good that he bought it. [68:14] I think it's good that people can say [68:15] what they want to say. Again, I I just I [68:18] think that at the end of the day it's [68:19] like, whatever Twitter is for people, if [68:22] they really enjoy it or they like it, [68:23] use it. [68:24] You know, there are times when I enjoy [68:25] it and I use it. There are times when I [68:27] just don't care as much and I'd rather [68:29] put those thoughts on my show [68:31] and develop them more. I think that's, [68:33] you know, where I'm at. [68:35] Do you ever get um bothered by feedback [68:37] you get? [68:38] Sure, everyone does. Everyone does. But, [68:39] I don't get a lot of I've tried to limit [68:42] feedback because feedback can work in [68:45] two ways. You can also start doing [68:47] something you think people will like and [68:50] then end up [68:52] destroying [68:53] the beauty of what you do or what you [68:55] enjoy. So, I think when people go, [68:58] "Well, why don't you do more of this? [69:00] Well, I don't like this. This sucks. Do [69:02] more of that. [69:03] You shouldn't be in that headspace. You [69:06] should go out and do what you do. And [69:08] then the responses to it are all valid [69:11] because the people that are having them, [69:13] this is their reaction. But you don't [69:15] have to consume their reactions as a way [69:17] to program your mind about the things [69:20] you created. I think you can let them [69:22] have their reactions. And you know, you [69:25] can tell [69:26] you know, you can look and and you know, [69:28] does what you're doing feel good? Does [69:30] it make you laugh? Is it funny? Do [69:32] people you trust and like enjoy it? And [69:35] you know, [69:36] you know, in in comedy there are [69:37] metrics, right? Uh there's all kinds of [69:40] things. The internet there's all kinds [69:41] of metrics. Are people liking it? Do [69:42] they buy tickets? Do they Are they [69:44] enjoying it? People communicate in all [69:46] kinds of ways. [69:47] So, your tour [69:48] Yes. [69:49] comes to the UK. Very, very excited. I'm [69:50] going to do my very, very best to make [69:52] sure I'm I'm at least one of the shows. [69:54] love to you go go to the one in Finland [69:55] where 19 people have bought tickets. No, [69:57] I'm kidding. Um that's uh [69:59] I love the Finnish woman sent me a [70:01] message. She goes, "It's not London and [70:02] it's not the Hamptons. But she goes, [70:04] it's what we have and I'll show it to [70:06] you." And I was like, "Well, I like [70:07] that." I like someone who's very [70:09] grounded like that who really knows what [70:10] it is. [70:12] But the Royal Albert Hall [70:13] That's the iconic venue and I'm I'm [70:15] really happy to do it. And I'm so mad [70:18] you're in Australia. We would have, you [70:20] know, [70:20] I'm pretty sure I'm in Australia on that [70:22] day, aren't I? Cuz I when I saw you post [70:24] on Twitter that you were coming to [70:25] London, I sent it to my team within [70:26] about a millisecond and said, "Oh my [70:28] god, let's all get tickets." And then [70:29] someone rebuttled and said you're in [70:31] Australia at that time. But you're doing [70:33] you're in Manchester and Liverpool as [70:34] well. [70:34] Manchester. For the 7th of April, the [70:35] Royal Albert Hall. [70:37] What what can one expect from that show? [70:41] I think if you [70:43] are into darker [70:46] comedy, if you like, you know, kind of [70:49] it's it's a lot of it's [70:51] somewhat [70:52] you know, [70:53] topical to a degree. I look back at the [70:56] year that we've kind of had and you [70:58] know, I talk about stories that have [70:59] interested me [71:01] in funny ways, you know, obviously and [71:03] there there are cultural trends in [71:04] America and probably a lot of them in [71:06] Britain that you know, we talk about all [71:08] these things. A lot of the things we've [71:09] covered today, whether it's social media [71:10] and its effect on children and mental [71:13] health. All of these things are themes [71:14] in the hour of comedy, right? And like [71:16] people getting canceled for certain [71:18] things and homelessness I talk about [71:20] because that's an epidemic in American [71:21] cities like uh drugs, everything. So, a [71:24] lot of what we've today, it's it's [71:26] funnier there. [71:30] And you um [71:31] Hopefully. [71:31] You I I think I heard you say you were [71:33] thinking about potentially moving to [71:35] London at one point. [71:36] I want to I'd love to own something in [71:37] London. I like One Hyde Park, but it's [71:39] very expensive and the reason that I [71:40] like it is because [71:42] it's the most expensive residential real [71:44] estate building in the world. No one [71:46] really lives there, but you see these [71:47] young Saudi kids drive their Bugattis [71:49] and stuff and every now and then one or [71:51] two lights is on and it to me it [71:53] symbolizes the utter coldness and [71:55] emptiness of having things. [71:58] And I think there's a beauty to that. [72:00] There's something very interesting about [72:01] it. You know, that whole city of London [72:02] really interests me and I don't mean the [72:03] city of London, I mean that city of [72:05] London, that city within a city, which [72:07] most people don't know about, but [72:08] there's a great article in Vanity Fair, [72:09] read it or don't. The point is that [72:12] whole area of Knightsbridge is very [72:13] interesting to me and One Hyde Park is [72:15] interesting because the the banality [72:18] and the hollowness of [72:22] extreme wealth really shocks We we tend [72:25] to And listen, we know the rich are [72:27] doing crazy things, right? The mega [72:29] rich, they crazy the yachts, the this, [72:31] the that, the Epstein stuff, a lot of it [72:33] not good, regrettable, we understand it. [72:36] There's also an element I think people [72:37] don't understand and that's to the [72:38] banality. [72:40] How boring. How [72:42] passionless [72:44] a lot of people are at that level of And [72:46] that's always made me [72:47] You would like to join the Knightsbridge [72:49] crowd. [72:49] I I well, to observe, you know, they'll [72:52] never let me in. That's the other thing [72:53] I love about I'm addicted to rejection, [72:55] right? Since I'm six, I've been [72:56] auditioning and have no, no. So, they'll [72:58] never let me in. But, it's just fun to [73:00] kind of look at. And you don't even want [73:02] to be in per se cuz it's not fun. That's [73:03] the thing, it's not really that fun. [73:06] But, it is funny to me when I look at [73:07] like, you know, the secrecy and how, [73:11] you know, some of it really yeah, is [73:13] really bad and people are doing crazy [73:15] things and they're overthrowing [73:16] governments and it that's probably 10% [73:19] of them. And the 90% of them, it's just [73:21] they're fighting extreme, suffocating [73:24] boredom. [73:25] And the north of England's very [73:26] different as you've observed. [73:28] Very spirited, lively, fun, interesting. [73:31] I love it there. [73:32] They like alcohol a little bit more, [73:33] they have fun. [73:35] have a lot of fun. [73:36] I guess they probably heckle you more. [73:37] Perhaps. Yeah. I mean, I haven't been in [73:40] the north. This is my first time in the [73:42] north. [73:42] I've been in Glasgow, which is Scotland. [73:44] I've been in Dublin. [73:45] Uh, but this is my first time in the [73:46] north. I did a show the sec- First show [73:48] in Dublin I did last year one of the [73:49] greatest shows I've ever done. Second [73:51] show, uh, was a late show and it was [73:53] just drunk, so drunk and they were crazy [73:55] and one woman screamed, "Fuck [73:56] Catholics." And then there was a big [73:58] fight in the audience. And then I [74:00] screamed at them. I said, "This is why [74:02] Dubai is winning. [74:03] This is why China is winning. Like, look [74:06] at you people. You're screaming You all [74:08] look alike. You all You look like me. [74:10] You're all potatoes screaming at other [74:12] potatoes that they're slightly different [74:14] kinds of potatoes. It's stupid." Um, and [74:17] they liked that. They cheered. I said, [74:18] "This is why you guys are losers and and [74:20] Dubai is taking over. They're building [74:21] buildings that reach the sky in your [74:23] sky." And they all cheered. They [74:24] understood, you know. [74:25] They get it. I mean, that's where I'm [74:27] from. That's where culturally I'm from. [74:28] So. [74:29] Dubai really is um, doing well by by all [74:31] sort of economic accounts. [74:32] People love it. People love it. [74:34] You You like it? [74:35] I've never been. [74:36] You've never been? [74:36] I've never been. [74:37] It's a beautiful, clean, orderly place. [74:41] Seems like there's no left. [74:42] that's the themes, right? I mean, this [74:43] is this is what, [74:45] you know, we're seeing is that this is [74:47] what people want. They want beautiful, [74:49] clean, and orderly, and [74:51] you know, that there's an underbelly [74:52] there, obviously. You know, this is not [74:55] ideal, right? Um [74:59] you know, but these are the things [75:00] America's struggling with right now. A [75:01] lot of our cities are in disarray. [75:03] Yeah, I mean California's a good example [75:05] of a city in disarray. I couldn't quite [75:06] believe it cuz the um the image we all [75:07] have of California as Brits is this [75:09] beautiful, clean [75:12] Lie. Lies. Hollywood lies. [75:14] That's what that's what we've seen on [75:15] our TVs. [75:16] There are some beautiful parts of this [75:18] state that are incredibly stunning, and [75:22] you are but it the people are hollow. [75:25] They're empty. They don't exist. All the [75:28] people you meet in LA are figments of [75:30] your imagination. They're fractals. [75:33] They're not real. You didn't meet them. [75:35] Uh they are uh an entity of which they [75:39] are they go between worlds, but they're [75:41] not physically in reality the way that [75:44] you are or I am. So, keep that in mind [75:46] as you're navigating the city that the [75:48] people, many of them that you're seeing, [75:51] it's just kind of, you know, some of [75:53] them are attractive and whatever, but [75:55] they actually don't meaningfully exist [75:57] in any way that you would understand. [76:00] There's quite actually a thin As you say [76:01] that, there's a thin line between the [76:02] two polar sides of LA, the extreme like [76:05] wealth and then the extreme poverty. [76:07] There's like a thin line psychologically [76:09] between [76:10] Most of LA is people [76:14] waiting for instructions. [76:17] That's what it is. [76:19] Now, because everybody here is on the [76:21] chopping block from the CEO of Paramount [76:23] to a busboy who's trying to get a [76:26] showcase to get a spot at the Hollywood [76:30] Improv, or [76:31] maybe he wants to be an actor, whatever. [76:33] Everybody in this town is replaceable. [76:35] Everybody feels that. Everybody So, [76:37] everybody's waiting for instructions. [76:39] Nobody wants to act. Everybody's waiting [76:40] for somebody else to let them know [76:42] what's okay because that is how the town [76:45] works and people tend to wait for a [76:48] consensus to build before they do [76:50] something. You know, again, they don't [76:52] believe anything. The town is not a town [76:54] of people who believe things. They are [76:56] They sit in their house. They're [76:57] sitting, you know, you you look at these [76:58] house in Beverly Hills or wherever you [77:00] are in Malibu. They're just sitting like [77:02] this. [77:03] They're sitting like this. They're very [77:04] still. [77:05] And they don't, you know, and then they [77:06] go out. The trainer works them out. They [77:07] go back in the shed and they stare. And [77:09] they're waiting for instruction. Waiting [77:10] for the phone a call. They're waiting [77:12] for an email. They're waiting to be told [77:13] what to believe and who to believe in. [77:16] And what reality is the reality of [77:18] today. Are fat women in? Great. Get them [77:21] on. Get a bunch of women in this on [77:23] oxygen machines. What are we in today? [77:26] Are we doing something else? Tomorrow, [77:27] are we back to hot people? Get them. [77:30] They're waiting for instructions. They [77:31] have no beliefs. They are empty. They're [77:34] hollow. They are vessels. [77:36] Um but it is pretty and the tacos are [77:38] good. [77:40] The um the thing that we've you know, as [77:41] Brits we've watched America for so long [77:43] and we see California, Hollywood. We you [77:45] know, we it seems glamorous. We see New [77:47] York which looks like an amazing place [77:48] as well. [77:48] New York's amazing. [77:49] And at the start [77:50] It's very different. [77:51] I love I love New York. I love New York. [77:52] an actual city. This is an idea and not [77:55] a good one. [77:56] And you said at the start of this this [77:58] you said the phrase that like you can [77:59] that it's bad advice that you can do [78:01] anything and be anything. But to us [78:02] that's always been like the American [78:04] dream. Is you come here and then you can [78:06] do anything and be anything. [78:08] That's what we see as the American dream [78:10] in the UK. Like the [78:12] land of possibilities. You can become [78:14] anyone and you rise to the top and [78:15] Well, yes, we market that quite well. [78:19] And sure, I mean, listen. [78:22] Yeah, I mean, could you? Yeah, but [78:25] the reality of the situation is [78:28] that journey [78:31] is a bit more involved than people say. [78:34] When you go, oh, you can be the [78:36] president of the United States. When you [78:38] tell a kid who's an eight, you know, 8 [78:40] years old or whatever, you can be the [78:41] president. Yeah, but the journey is a [78:43] bit involved. You leave out a lot. You [78:46] leave out a lot about the compromises [78:48] that you have to make to become the [78:50] president of the United States. [78:52] It's kind of like telling someone they [78:54] can be a superhero. Yes, I'm sure that [78:57] you can be a version of that, but [78:58] there's a little bit you're going to [78:59] have to do. [79:01] Um [79:02] I think it's a very bad overall thing to [79:06] tell masses of people [79:09] that they should without regard to [79:11] reality, [79:12] without regard to their own [79:15] uh limitations or their own without [79:18] regard to their own tolerance for work [79:21] and how much work they want to make [79:22] without regard for any of that, telling [79:26] them that they can just be anything they [79:28] want to be. It's such a deeper [79:30] conversation [79:32] and it's such a it's a catchphrase. It's [79:34] a license plate. It's something to put [79:36] on a shirt. It's a bumper sticker. It's [79:39] not a philosophy for life because [79:41] there's a lot more [79:43] there's a lot more that goes into that [79:45] statement and I think that's what I [79:47] mean. Not that people can't do great [79:49] things. People can absolutely do great [79:51] things. I think people can do great [79:53] things in the UK, too, right? People can [79:56] do things in the UK. I mean, maybe the [79:58] class system's a more stratified there [80:00] than it is here, [80:02] but I just think that like, you know, [80:05] what we mean when we say you can be [80:06] whatever you want in America is you can [80:08] make as much money as you want. That's [80:10] what we're really saying. We're really [80:12] pushing this idea that the only route to [80:15] happiness is this upwardly mobile [80:17] vertical where you have to grab [80:19] everything and be a boss and be an [80:21] entrepreneur and run an empire and [80:23] that's the way to happiness. That's not [80:27] the way to happiness. That's what we're [80:29] pushing. We're not telling everybody [80:31] they can be anything they want to be so [80:33] that we have a lot of challenges to like [80:35] our ideas and stuff. We're not We're not [80:38] looking for that type of feedback. We [80:39] just want people going out and working [80:41] themselves to death. That's what we [80:44] really want. When you say that you can [80:45] be anything you want to be, the [80:46] translation is work yourself to death. [80:49] I'm going on my boat. [80:51] And then this younger generation aren't [80:53] apparently working themselves to death [80:54] if you if you observe things like TikTok [80:56] where they're having like the mocha [80:58] chocolate frappalattes and doing the [80:59] yoga and they're working at the big tech [81:01] company and quiet quitting and [81:02] Some of them have figured out that the [81:04] country's a scam. And here's the good [81:06] news. They're not wrong and what when [81:09] when you figured out the country's a [81:11] scam, you can approach it the way a con [81:14] artist or a scammer would approach it, [81:16] which is what a lot of them do. They [81:17] invent mental health elements they don't [81:19] have. They take days off on end. They [81:21] terrify their superiors into respecting [81:24] their mediocre shotty quality of work. [81:26] This is something that Gen Z has latched [81:29] onto. This is something that I fully [81:31] support. Um this is their way of rising [81:34] through the ranks. They're taking [81:36] advantage of people that they work with [81:39] um and and uh you know, making them [81:41] tolerate less and less work and work of [81:43] lower and lower quality because they've [81:45] realized that a lot of this is [ __ ] [81:47] So they're like, why shouldn't I get in [81:48] on it? [81:50] And there's also the remote working now [81:52] as well. That's a big thing post [81:53] pandemic [81:53] Yeah. Which is Absolutely. [81:56] We've realized over the pandemic I I [81:59] think a lot of people that a lot of the [82:01] things that we thought were guarantees [82:04] aren't and a lot of [82:06] the things we tended to believe in [82:08] fervently, we at the very least right [82:10] now question. [82:12] I think young people like, why in the [82:14] hell should I spend 40 hours [82:17] doing a job I hate when I can pretend to [82:19] do it and threaten my boss if they try [82:23] to fire me and fake a mental illness [82:25] that I don't have and demand everybody [82:28] conform to what I want and then use [82:31] whatever diversity chips I have to go [82:34] out and and throw a scare into anyone [82:37] that tries to call me to account for any [82:39] of my behavior. [82:41] And I think that's a beautiful thing. I [82:42] mean, it's very interesting. It's really [82:44] destabilizing a lot of uh society, you [82:46] know. Now, obviously, the same thing is [82:48] to shut those people up and say shut up. [82:50] You have to do these things or get out. [82:53] But, nobody's going to do that. They [82:54] found the flaw in the system. They've [82:56] kind of exposed the scam and once the [82:59] scam is exposed, it's for all to be seen [83:01] and now everybody can kind of just [83:04] approach it the way it is. Everybody now [83:06] is kind of like even big companies, [83:08] everybody's like in it for themself and [83:10] just trying to figure out like, how do I [83:12] get the most? And there's nothing wrong [83:14] with that. That's the most American [83:16] thing ever, right? Is to try to get some [83:19] for yourself. There's no There shouldn't [83:21] be any hate for that. It's a bit silly, [83:24] ridiculous, and crazy how they do it. [83:26] But, they're only taking the tools that [83:29] you've given to them and that you've [83:31] allowed them to use, right? [83:33] Mhm. [83:33] So, they use these things, you know? [83:35] Smart. [83:36] They go, "Why are you late today?" They [83:38] go, "I'm gay, you know. Don't worry [83:40] about it." You know, like what They're [83:42] They're They're you It's the most [83:44] American thing ever to use [83:47] the the playbook that someone hands you [83:49] and goes, "Here's the playbook." And you [83:51] go, "Great. [83:52] I have an anxiety. I have an You keep [83:55] coming into my physical space." It's [83:57] great words. You keep coming into my [83:58] physical space. You're using volume [84:00] right now. I have anxiety. I need time [84:02] right now to I do This report is not [84:05] ready, but I need time right now. And I [84:07] have And you know what I need right now [84:08] is just to be a little quiet. So, it's [84:10] great. I mean, I'm for it. [84:13] Let's talk about Zoe, who you may know [84:16] because they're a sponsor of this [84:18] podcast and I'm an investor in the [84:19] company. You guys know health is my [84:21] number one priority. Zoe's growth story [84:23] has been absolutely incredible so far. [84:25] They're doing science at a scale that [84:27] I've never seen before. Because of their [84:29] members and recent breakthroughs in [84:30] research, they can now continue to offer [84:33] the most scientifically advanced gut [84:34] health test on the market. Previously, [84:38] the test allowed them to analyze 30 [84:40] bacteria types in your gut, but now, [84:43] thanks to new science, they've [84:44] identified 100 bacteria types. This is a [84:46] huge step forward and there's nothing [84:49] else that's available even close to it [84:51] on the market at all. So, to find out [84:53] more and to get started on your Zoe [84:55] journey, visit zoe.com/steven. [84:58] You can use my exclusive code CEO10 [85:02] for 10% off. Don't tell anybody about [85:04] that, okay? Just for you guys. [85:06] I've I've interviewed a lot of people [85:07] about AI, experts at the very top of [85:09] these AI companies, but you you [85:11] mentioned it earlier. And I was when I [85:12] knew you were coming today, I thought, [85:13] "This is the guy I need to ask about the [85:15] future of AI." Because as it relates to [85:17] that generation, the thing that's going [85:18] to disrupt them, but also many other [85:19] generations, is the advent of [85:22] super intelligence, where, you know, [85:23] apparently all of the things we do [85:25] that report can be done by some kind of [85:28] robot or AI. So, you must have a a [85:31] pretty, you know, informed view about [85:33] artificial intelligence. [85:34] Well, listen, it's affecting the [85:36] industry that I'm in greatly. I think [85:38] I'm lucky enough, and comedians are [85:39] lucky enough, that we won't be replaced [85:41] as quickly, perhaps, as other people, [85:44] but it's certainly going to disrupt [85:48] the world of writing, the world of [85:49] acting. Certainly, you know, Tyler Perry [85:51] just canceled an $800 million expansion [85:54] because he looked at this new AI that [85:56] was generating locations. Because why do [85:58] we have to have on-location shoots? So, [86:00] then you start thinking about set [86:02] dressers, prop companies, all these [86:04] things that will be, you know, you know, [86:07] maybe unnecessary now with AI. So, the [86:10] business that I'm in, it it seems like, [86:13] and again, not to be [86:15] overly dramatic about it, but it people [86:17] are looking at it like an apocalyptic [86:19] event because there are jobs that when [86:22] we look at how profoundly AI is going to [86:24] impact the business that just simply [86:26] won't exist. [86:28] You know, we have AI influencers now [86:30] that are actually because we've bred in [86:33] this country some of the least [86:35] interesting people on the planet and [86:37] some of the most interesting. But some [86:39] of the least interesting people, the [86:40] most generic people are making millions [86:43] and millions of dollars to essentially [86:44] just hawking products on the internet. [86:45] So all they do, they go, "Someone asked [86:48] me about my skin care routine and I [86:50] thought I would share something with you [86:51] guys. I'd share a promo code with you [86:53] guys because a lot of people come up to [86:55] me and they go, 'Your skin is really [86:56] glistening. It looks really good.'" So [86:58] I'm really excited to share this promo [87:00] and and so those people don't need to [87:02] exist. In fact, they really don't. They [87:04] don't exist as human beings. So they [87:06] need to be just replaced by a pixelated [87:08] version of that, an AI version of that. [87:11] There's Now going from Robert De Niro to [87:13] AI, that's going to be a thing. Going [87:14] from, you know, [87:17] Tina Turner to AI, that's a big deal. [87:19] Going from these people, these generic [87:22] barcodes with feet, these promo codes, [87:25] going from them to AI is going to be [87:28] literally unnoticeable. Let it happen. [87:31] I saw an AI influencer the other day [87:34] that had 200,000 followers. I was like, [87:36] "Oh my god." [87:37] And then some with millions. There's [87:38] like Lynn What's that? Lynn AI [87:40] influencer that's got millions and [87:41] millions. And I was thinking And then [87:42] the crazy thing was the comment section [87:44] Yeah. [87:45] of like these men that were genuinely [87:48] messaging this AI influencer saying [87:50] Very healthy men. Yes. Genuinely. Yes. [87:53] Well, you know, [87:55] not everyone's happy with women at right [87:57] now and this AI woman might be, you [87:59] know, doing better. I don't know. [88:00] If you If you play this forward, you [88:02] talked about robotics earlier. AI [88:03] robotics [88:04] people are getting lonelier than ever. [88:06] It seems like a lot of people in the [88:08] future are going to be dating these AI [88:10] Yes. [88:11] sex robots. [88:12] That might be where I finally find [88:14] someone that respects my autonomy and [88:18] respects me and it might be someone I [88:20] love. I mean, I'm very open to that to [88:22] dating kind of an AI. [88:23] Really? [88:24] Well, I mean, you never say never. [88:27] You never say never. I mean, [88:29] humans are over. We've had a run. It's [88:32] ending. [88:34] It's all around us. That's why I mean [88:36] the whole thing about the children. No [88:37] one cares. Politicians used to talk [88:39] endlessly about children and families. [88:41] Now the only reason children come up is [88:43] if they're using a bathroom and it's a [88:45] gender thing. Other than that, no one [88:47] cares. No one cares. They're only a [88:49] battering ram about like a cultural [88:51] conversation or whatever. It has nothing [88:53] to do with like are they being educated? [88:55] Do they have they got any money? Can [88:56] they own anything ever? And you know, [88:59] all these all these companies that own [89:01] everything now and they have have [89:02] excluded people, have locked people out [89:04] of owning them, the BlackRocks, things [89:05] like that. Basically, they're just [89:07] having They're just like the internet's [89:08] your home now. That's what you That's [89:10] your home. You can't own a house. You [89:12] can't own anything, but you own your [89:14] avatar. You can date someone who's AI. [89:16] You can have any comments on anything [89:18] you want. If we you know, something [89:19] comes out and you don't like it, you can [89:21] type about it. You'll never own a thing. [89:23] You'll never own a house. You'll never [89:24] own a car. You'll never have any money. [89:27] The best parts of the world will be [89:28] colonized by the super rich. The rest [89:30] will be ravaged by climate change. The [89:32] good news is you can close the door to [89:34] your little pod, talk to your AI [89:35] influencer, and have an opinion, but it [89:37] won't change anything and it won't [89:39] matter because you'll be living in this [89:41] world that we've created for you to feel [89:43] like you have a purpose, but we've [89:45] robbed you of all of the things [89:48] that you could say that are yours. And [89:52] everything that is yours, even your own [89:54] thoughts, we now own. Even your your [89:57] locations are digital. The way you you [90:00] know, where you park your memories are [90:01] digital. We own all of that. We've taken [90:04] everything from you. The the [90:07] physical dimension of your life, we've [90:08] just completely removed it. We've let [90:10] the cities you used to love get invaded [90:12] with hordes of drug addicts and you're [90:15] scared to leave your home and isn't that [90:16] nice isn't that great because you don't [90:17] really need to leave your home anyway. [90:19] So, after we've taken all of this from [90:21] you, we're going to give you a nice AI [90:22] influencer today. So, am I optimistic [90:25] about the future? The answer is yes. [90:27] What about men? Men are struggling it [90:28] seems. [90:30] Yeah. [90:30] If you look at the data, there's men [90:31] seem to be lonely than ever. There's [90:33] higher rates of sort of suicide and that [90:35] sort of thing. [90:36] There's lots of sort of addictions, [90:37] there's pornography addictions and stuff [90:38] like that. You know, now we have these [90:40] sort of quote-unquote [90:42] masculine influencers emerging that are [90:44] presenting a set of answers and telling [90:46] them that they're losers and those [90:47] people seem to be the most compelling [90:49] to that group. [90:50] Yeah, well, I I I think it's again, I [90:52] think that [90:54] dividing the world into interest groups [90:58] and having them only be interest groups [91:00] and [91:01] you know, giving our humanity away [91:04] to this idea that we should all be [91:07] pitted against each other, whether it's [91:09] men and women, whether it's different [91:10] races, whether it's different religions. [91:13] At the end of the day, it all feeds the [91:15] same type of isolation that you're [91:17] seeing now, right? It feeds that. It is [91:21] an ideology that is not about building [91:24] anything, it's not about constructing [91:25] something, it's about tearing something [91:27] apart. So, when everybody endlessly [91:29] talks about how terrible men are or that [91:31] men are the result of all of these [91:33] horrible things happen because of men [91:35] and that you know, having a man in [91:37] something or giving a man an opportunity [91:39] for whatever reason. Now, obviously, men [91:41] do great in the world, right? So, even [91:43] as people hear me say this, they're [91:44] going to get angry, they're going to go, [91:45] "No, every president's been a man." [91:48] Well, you [91:48] But, no, the reality is, you know, [91:51] hearing if you're a young guy, you're [91:52] young boy that goes to school and you [91:54] hear that you're toxic and there's [91:55] traits about you that are toxic and that [91:58] you're contributing to a world view [92:01] uh is unknowingly or that you're [92:02] inherently racist or that you're [92:04] inherently sexist. [92:06] Learning that and hearing that and [92:08] feeling that and everything else I just [92:11] talked about, this world that is harder [92:12] and harder to stand out in. It's harder [92:16] and harder to get something that feels [92:19] like it's worthwhile. It's more [92:22] difficult now to carve out a space for [92:25] yourself for everybody, you know? But I [92:28] think nobody wants to hear men talk [92:30] about it. Nobody wants to hear men [92:33] commiserate about the difficulties and [92:36] the challenges they're having because I [92:37] think a lot of people's knee-jerk [92:39] reaction is to just tell men, "You've [92:41] had it good. Shut up. Nobody wants to [92:43] hear you." That's terrible. These are [92:45] also the same people who talk about the [92:46] importance of mental health [92:48] and how important it is to to talk about [92:50] mental health. So, I think we have to we [92:53] have to stop [92:55] pitting people against each other and [92:57] stop, you know, tearing everything apart [93:01] and start to build things based on [93:03] values and the values cannot be just [93:06] this rampant tribalism of you're a man, [93:09] you're straight, you're gay, you're [93:11] white, you're black, you're indigenous, [93:13] you're [93:14] I think we have to build it on values [93:15] like what do we believe? [93:17] What do we believe? And then you should [93:18] be around like-minded people who believe [93:20] the things you believe and they all [93:22] don't have to be the same thing. America [93:23] is a very big country. The people that [93:25] live in Malibu, California don't believe [93:26] the same things the people that live in [93:28] Louisiana. That's okay. We're all going [93:31] to die if we keep trying to convince [93:32] each other to think the way other people [93:36] think. There is not a bigger waste of [93:38] time on this planet than for me to go to [93:41] people and convince them to have the [93:44] same thoughts I'm having and the same [93:45] experience on this planet that I am [93:47] having. The way forward is to respect [93:50] people's differences and to create a [93:51] world where different people can thrive. [93:54] And Andrew Tate has shown up as kind of [93:55] a symbol for that group of people with [93:57] the Lamborghini and the muscles and the [93:58] fighting and the money and the women and [94:01] and it that's drawn in a big group of [94:03] men who say, [94:04] you know, [94:05] Well, you know, I I think I've met [94:07] Andrew Tate. I've had him on my show and [94:08] he's very very very lovely to me. He was [94:10] a nice guy. I think what he speaks to [94:12] and he says wacky things like everyone [94:14] does like I do like a lot of people do. [94:15] He's not Again, he shouldn't be a [94:17] senator. [94:18] Um [94:19] but I think what he speaks to is that [94:21] desire that a lot of people have a lot [94:25] of men have to be respected. [94:27] They want to be respected. [94:30] And they want to do things in life that [94:31] bring them respect. And I think he's [94:34] preaching certain things that can get [94:37] you respect, can raise your status as [94:40] male. [94:41] Now, some of those things have negative [94:43] connotations and some of those things [94:45] might have unintended consequences, but [94:47] the things he's talking about it's easy [94:49] why young people [94:52] understand why they would want to have [94:53] money and have status and, you know, be [94:56] in good shape and all these things that [94:58] are, you know, somewhat demonized, you [95:02] know, potentially by people [95:04] but then also at the same time coveted. [95:07] Meaning that a lot of the people that [95:08] demonize the Andrew Tates of the world [95:11] are doing the same thing he's doing [95:14] in another way. Nobody would ever, you [95:16] know, if you're if if someone goes and [95:18] celebrates female CEOs, they would never [95:21] be criticized. It would actually be a [95:24] great thing. If I had an event for women [95:26] leaders, if I had an event for women [95:28] leaders and I got up and I said, "These [95:30] women are rich. You have money. You have [95:33] status. Look what you've done." It would [95:36] be cheered. This would be the Aspen [95:37] Ideas Conference. This would be [95:38] anywhere, right? Now, [95:41] what Andrew Tate has said to men, [95:43] among other things that are probably not [95:45] all great, but one of his things is go [95:48] get your financial status up because [95:52] that's how you're going to get respect [95:53] in this world is by having money and not [95:55] relying on other people. [95:57] That is demonized endlessly as this [95:59] crazy thing that is terrible and the [96:02] worst advice for men to get. And he [96:03] says, yes, it'll get you women. By [96:05] having these things it'll get you women. [96:07] And then people demonize that. They go, [96:08] how dare he? That's crazy. But on the [96:10] flip side, if I'm celebrating the [96:13] material accomplishments of women, [96:15] that's in our culture great. [96:17] And telling girls that they all should [96:19] be girl bosses and they all should get [96:21] material things and own your house and [96:24] own a company and be [96:26] So, I think there's a little bit of a [96:28] double standard where we're kind of we [96:30] we look at the Andrew Tates of the [96:31] world, we we completely demonize the [96:33] idea that they're telling men money gets [96:35] you status, these things get you status, [96:37] get you women. However, on the other [96:38] side, we're constantly telling [96:40] uh young women that career-oriented [96:44] goals [96:46] are the most important thing in life. [96:50] We have a closing tradition on this [96:52] podcast where the last guest leaves a [96:53] question for the next guest not knowing [96:54] who they're going to leave it for. [96:55] Interesting. Wow. [96:58] That's a good one. [96:59] Oh, I think you know this person. [97:01] But I Okay, but but interesting. After I [97:04] say the question, can you tell me who it [97:05] is? [97:06] Well, that violates the rules a little [97:07] bit. [97:08] right. All right. Then I won't violate [97:09] the rules. [97:10] But you you would be able to figure it [97:11] out if you if you care enough to figure [97:13] it out. Actually, we we turn these into [97:15] cards, which are over there. So, it's a [97:18] stack of cards. And if you turn over [97:20] your question, the question you'll Well, [97:21] if you if you find this question in [97:23] there, you turn it over and you scan the [97:25] back of the card. It will show you [97:26] answering it. So, you would be able to [97:28] figure it out. [97:29] Oh, interesting. Okay, so I have to [97:30] leave a question for [97:31] the next person. [97:32] person. And you don't know who that's [97:33] going to be either. [97:34] Do I answer their question first? [97:35] Yeah, you answer this one first. [97:36] Okay. [97:37] Who should you have apologized to but [97:40] didn't and why? [97:42] Good question. [97:43] Um [97:46] Meghan Markle. [97:47] because when she launched her lifestyle [97:50] brand [97:52] American Riviera Orchard [97:54] which is a beautiful collection of [97:55] glassware and dishes [97:57] for the upwardly mobile woman. [98:00] I really thought I had doubted her level [98:04] of shamelessness. I am now I respect it. [98:07] I like it. I'd have lunch with her. I've [98:09] come full circle on her. [98:12] Using all of that [98:14] um social capital [98:16] uh about this supposed racist treatment [98:18] you received [98:20] using all of that social capital to [98:22] launch a lifestyle brand so that people [98:25] have glasses of which they can drink [98:27] Chardonnay [98:28] in in Santa Barbara. [98:31] Perfect. So I'm sorry Meghan that I had [98:33] ever doubted you. [98:35] I'm on board now in a major way and if [98:37] there is a job for me at American [98:38] Riviera Orchard, three words that don't [98:41] really make sense together but yet sound [98:43] lovely, I would love to [98:45] I would love to be I'd love to be [98:47] considered for a position. [98:49] So you're a fan of Meghan Markle's now? [98:50] Big time. [98:52] Big time. It's going the other way. [98:54] Often with me it does. I'll criticize a [98:56] person for being sort of grotesque and [98:59] then they start to own their [99:00] grotesqueness and it makes them you [99:03] inevitably have to like them because [99:06] they're just so shameless. You just go I [99:08] like this. I I adore this. You know, [99:11] like I saw [99:13] I saw her and she's like American [99:15] Riviera Orchard, Montecito. It's just so [99:18] funny. It's everything she supposedly [99:20] hates which is privilege and class and [99:22] all this stuff and it's just right [99:24] there. You know. It's great. It's It's [99:27] It's actually fun and it gives me hope [99:30] for the future. [99:31] I sense you aren't being serious with [99:33] that answer. [99:34] But I am. I would apologize to her. I [99:36] would say to her [99:38] I doubted you [99:39] and [99:40] uh you know, and I I I am kind of deadly [99:42] serious about that. Meghan Markle is at [99:45] her essence, okay, a climber. [99:48] This is all she is. A Hollywood actress [99:50] is a climber. Look where she's climbed. [99:53] Look where she's climbed. She's living [99:55] in a mansion in Montecito. She's got all [99:57] these idiots like [99:59] she has climbed. That We're not talking [100:01] about her character. We're not talking [100:03] about that. I I I'm hitting the desk [100:04] again. We're not talking about her [100:05] character. We're talking only about the [100:07] results. You have to give it to her. [100:10] A lot of C-list actresses end up a lot [100:14] of places. Very few of them end up in [100:16] Buckingham Palace [100:17] or our version of Buckingham Palace, [100:19] which is Montecito. So, good for her. [100:21] I'm not going to let you leave until you [100:22] give me a [100:24] another answer. [100:25] Another answer about who I should have [100:26] apologized to? [100:28] I don't know. I've apologized to so many [100:30] people. [100:31] Um [100:33] I guess my grandmother who died, I [100:34] should have been more apologetic about [100:37] you know, when I was a druggy and when I [100:40] was out there and how much she worried [100:42] about me. I think people tend to not [100:46] realize how much anxiety their behavior [100:50] causes. Like I didn't realize how me [100:53] going out and staying out late and doing [100:55] these things, she just spent a lot of [100:57] time worrying about me. And she was such [100:59] a positive force in my life. If I could [101:02] speak to her again, I would apologize [101:03] for [101:05] you know, how how you know, [101:08] inconsiderate I was. [101:11] Tim, thank you. [101:13] Thank you. [101:13] Thank you so much. You know, I've you've [101:17] you're potentially my favorite comedian. [101:19] Oh, stop. [101:19] And I only say that because I've never [101:21] seen you live, but I absolutely you've [101:23] given me so many moments of joy, [101:26] laughter amongst a life that sometimes [101:27] difficult. I'm not going to say I've got [101:29] a very difficult life these days, but [101:30] sometimes I struggle like everyone else. [101:32] In those moments I actually find myself [101:33] gravitating towards you because I think [101:35] you represent the other side of my brain [101:38] which I'm not sort of publicly allowed [101:40] to you know [101:43] investigate as much cuz it your humor is [101:45] so unacceptable at times that it is so [101:48] wonderful. [101:48] Well, thank you so much. [101:50] rare in a world where people are [101:51] increasingly scared. I was I was it's [101:53] funny the amount of times I've played [101:55] clips or videos of yours to all of my [101:56] team here way before you know I mean we [101:59] were sitting down sitting down together. [102:01] Is incredible and to hear that you're [102:02] coming to London and you're going to be [102:03] doing the show is very very exciting and [102:05] I would recommend everybody every single [102:07] person to go and get tickets to Tim [102:10] Dillon's tour called American Royalty. [102:12] It's the American Royalty tour and we're [102:14] we're all over the UK and Royal Albert's [102:16] the you know the penultimate the really [102:18] the great one you know but then there's [102:20] also places like Finland and other [102:22] places that [102:23] you know are are are of less importance [102:26] to me and the world. [102:27] Thank you so much. The links to your [102:29] tour are all below in the description [102:30] below so everyone can go and get those [102:32] go and get those tickets right now [102:33] before they all sell out so [102:35] Tim thank you. Thank you for being here. [102:37] Thank you for everything you do and I [102:38] don't think you'll ever you're probably [102:39] not very good at taking compliments I [102:40] can kind of see that in you a little [102:41] bit. [102:41] great at it but I'm I'm usually being [102:43] yelled at but thank you. Thank you for [102:45] having me on I really enjoyed this.