## Background
This video was published on YouTube by the channel PowerfulJRE on September 1, 2026. The page description outlines the background of featured guest Brian Simpson, noting his YouTube special 'Live from the Mothership', his podcast 'BS with Brian Simpson', and his live show 'Bottom of the Barrel' at the Comedy Mothership.
## TL;DR
Host Joe Rogan and comedian Brian Simpson discuss political corruption, historical power dynamics, and the psychological roots of modern outrage. They explore dark historical events, scientific oddities, and medical history, including germ theory and the life of Ignaz Semmelweis. The conversation turns to combat sports, severe injuries, and pain management, before concluding with a look at AI infrastructure, automated future economies, and changing artistic landscapes.
## Atmosphere & style
The show carries a relaxed, inquisitive, and candid tone characteristic of a late-night conversation between seasoned comedians. Rogan acts as an enthusiastic curator of bizarre facts and historical tangents, while Simpson offers grounded, witty counterpoints rooted in observational humor. The energy flows organically from dark humor and streetwise analysis to genuine curiosity about existential threats and technological shifts.
## Key takeaways
- [44:35](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=2675s) Joe Rogan details how politicians slide into systemic corruption due to financial pressures, corporate capture, and exposure to blackmail.
- [47:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=2828s) Brian Simpson and Joe Rogan examine why aging politicians refuse to relinquish power, citing cases like Mitch McConnell, Dianne Feinstein, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
- [52:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=3168s) The discussion covers historical and biblical revelations, pointing to researcher Benny Shanon's theory that Moses' burning bush was a DMT-bearing Acacia tree.
- [59:35](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=3575s) Brian Simpson connects Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of slave morality to modern cancel culture, describing it as resentment masquerading as virtue.
- [01:06:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=3984s) Analyzing street fights and self-defense, Rogan highlights proper fighting mechanics and warns of the severe dangers of head impacts on concrete.
- [01:09:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=4188s) Brian Simpson shares a personal anecdote from his time as a bouncer in San Diego, illustrating unpredictable public violence and emotional dysregulation.
- [01:13:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=4382s) Rogan reviews the isolation and hostile history of North Sentinel Island stemming from 19th-century British officer Maurice Vidal Portman's actions.
- [01:19:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=4752s) The history of germ theory is highlighted through Ignaz Semmelweis, who introduced handwashing but was ostracized by the medical establishment.
- [01:22:41](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=4961s) Rogan discusses how antiseptic mouthwashes kill essential oral bacteria, impairing the body's natural nitric oxide production and blood vessel dilation.
- [01:37:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=5827s) The geopolitical trajectory of China is analyzed regarding its state-controlled economic model, demographic challenges from the One-Child Policy, and open-source AI development.
- [01:45:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=6306s) Rogan explains the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis, detailing how ancient comet impacts likely melted major ice sheets and caused rapid global flooding.
- [01:57:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=7025s) The physical toll of professional sports and high rates of painkiller dependency, such as Toradol injections in the NFL, are examined.
- [02:05:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=7508s) Rogan highlights severe combat sports injuries, including Irene Aldana's massive forehead cut and historic rule changes in football to reduce fatalities.
- [02:27:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=8829s) The technological race toward AGI and advanced robotics is explored, alongside concerns about the rapid pacing of AI integration and dead internet theory.
- [02:43:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=9789s) Rogan plug's Brian Simpson's stand-up special 'Live from the Mothership' and praises his weekly comedy show 'Bottom of the Barrel'.
## Detailed walkthrough
### [00:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=1s) Promoting the Special and Comedy Mechanics
The episode kicks off with Joe Rogan welcoming comedian Brian Simpson to the studio to talk about his comedy special, *Live from the Mothership*, which was recorded at the Comedy Mothership in Austin and made available on YouTube. Rogan praises Simpson’s hour, highlighting a favorite bit of his—"Wamp"—and describing it as an inspired piece of material with a fantastic narrative arc that comes full circle. Simpson jokes that he might never write anything better than that bit, admitting that comics are often haunted by iconic material that fans single out for years. At the time of recording, Simpson notes that the special had reached around 300,000 views, aiming to push it past the one-million mark.
The conversation transitions into the inherent difficulty of capturing the energy of a live stand-up show on camera. Rogan notes that watching a recorded special at home only delivers about 60 to 70 percent of the live room's atmosphere because the viewer isn't physically present in the crowd. Simpson offers a colorful analogy to explain the difference:
> "The analogy I use is like it's the difference between watching porno and then watching those same two people have sex right in front of you."
They break down the high-pressure environment of filming a special. Rogan advises shooting multiple sets—ideally four—so that once one good performance is in the bag, the comedian feels free to relax and treat the remaining sets like standard shows. Simpson notes that doing his first recorded set gave him a sense of freedom, contrasting it with historical specials like Bill Hicks's *Relentless* in London, where Hicks appeared visibly tense because comedians back then typically shot only a single performance in a massive theater. Rogan adds that while he used to shoot two nights for peace of mind, he eventually switched to doing live specials, finding the thrill exciting and preferring to avoid the painful editing process. Simpson agrees, noting that watching oneself on camera and agonizing over post-show tags is pure torture for a comedian.
- **Special Title:** *Live from the Mothership* (available on YouTube).
- **Featured Bit:** "Wamp".
- **View Count Target:** Aiming to cross 1 million views (up from 300,000).
- **Filming Advice:** Shoot four performances if possible to relieve pressure after getting one safe take in the can.
- **Reference Mentioned:** Bill Hicks's *Relentless* special in London.
---
[04:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=283s) CTE Studies and Head Trauma in Sports
Simpson brings up a recent study released by the CTE Center regarding Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy in former American football players. The researchers examined data from hundreds of deceased NFL players, contacting their families to request brain donations. Out of the families who agreed to donate, over 90 percent of the brains tested positive for CTE, leading researchers to conclude that at least a quarter of all players in the sample suffered from the condition—a figure considered a conservative baseline.
Rogan and Simpson discuss how the study's lead author, Dr. Daniel Daneshvar, noted that while the absolute maximum potential prevalence could theoretically reach near 97 percent, the true rate lies somewhere in the middle. Simpson cracks that the remaining 3 percent without brain damage must just be the kickers. The discussion expands to cover how subconcussive head trauma—repeated hits to the head that do not result in overt concussions—is just as damaging over time. Rogan points out that CTE is even found in high school athletes and soccer players due to heading the ball thousands of times throughout a career. They also touch upon other neurological conditions affecting athletes, such as ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), referencing former NFL players and famous figures like Stephen Hawking.
- **Sample Size & Findings:** Out of 878 deceased NFL players studied between 2008 and 2021, over 90% of donated brains showed CTE, establishing a low-end baseline prevalence of 25% across the entire sample set.
- **Lead Author:** Dr. Daniel Daneshvar.
- **Key Takeaway:** Subconcussive impacts (e.g., heading a soccer ball repeatedly) do severe long-term damage even without formal concussions.
---
[08:38](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=518s) Dark Humor, Social Double Standards, and the Lindsay Clancy Case
Simpson shifts the conversation to how CTE has morphed into a casual punchline on the internet, calling it "the new R-word." Rogan attributes this to a lack of public sympathy for "brutish men," comparing it to the broader societal double standard in how male versus female crimes are perceived in the media. This leads into a detailed discussion of the high-profile murder case involving Lindsay Clancy, a Massachusetts mother who strangled her three children before attempting suicide by cutting herself and jumping out of a window.
Simpson walks through a dark stand-up bit he worked on regarding the case. He points out the tragic absurdity of public sympathy poured out for her compared to the absolute horror of the crime:
> "I feel like she doesn't have good problem-solving skills because you was three for three on the strangulation, and then when you tried to kill yourself, you using unproven methods. Why not strangle yourself? You are definitely good at that."
Rogan expresses disgust at the vocal online supporters defending Clancy or floating conspiracy theories blaming her husband, arguing that people are losing their minds by rationalizing such acts. He emphasizes the horror of the crime scene and notes that if her defenders had to face the reality of what happened to those children, their sympathy would evaporate.
- **Case Referenced:** The Lindsay Clancy trial (a mother who strangled her three children in Duxbury, Massachusetts).
- **Simpson's Bit:** Commenting on the tragic irony of her high success rate with strangulation versus her failed suicide attempt.
---
[11:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=706s) COVID-19, Pandemics, and Gain-of-Function Research
The topic pivots when Simpson jokingly brings up the COVID-19 pandemic, admitting that he enjoyed the enforced lockdown because it gave him a long vacation and stating that he wouldn't mind another pandemic just to stay home for six months without feeling guilty. Rogan lightheartedly compares Simpson to Dr. Anthony Fauci, accusing him of being willing to sacrifice global stability for personal leisure.
The conversation turns serious as Rogan criticisms Dr. Fauci and the official response to the virus. Rogan argues that the vaccines failed to stop transmission or infection effectively, while opening people up to unwanted risks. He lays out his perspective on gain-of-function research, alleging that after the Obama administration paused funding for such experiments in the U.S., research was routed through organizations like Peter Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance to fund dangerous virus manipulation at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Rogan outlines theories around biological warfare, discussing historical experiments where disease-carrying vectors were weaponized. He cites Plum Island—located off the coast of Long Island near Lyme, Connecticut—as a historical facility tied to vector-borne disease research, noting the longstanding theory connecting it to the origin of Lyme disease. He argues that gain-of-function research has failed to produce cures or preventative treatments for the very pathogens it creates, concluding that public health officials mishandled the pandemic and lied about the origin of the research.
- **Organizations & Names Mentioned:** Dr. Anthony Fauci, EcoHealth Alliance, Plum Island, Lyme (Connecticut).
- **Core Argument:** Rogan claims gain-of-function research enhances viral transmissibility under the guise of prevention without actually delivering effective cures when outbreaks occur.
[15:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=900s) COVID-19 Vaccine Claims, Fauci, and the Biden Pardons
Joe Rogan and Brian Simpson dive into intense criticism of Dr. Anthony Fauci's public health guidance during the pandemic. Rogan claims that Fauci misled the public regarding the risks of COVID-19 vaccines for pregnant women, alleging that internal communications acknowledged potential dangers—specifically relating to a "cytokine storm" during the first trimester—that were omitted from public announcements. Rogan highlights personal accounts of women he knows who experienced miscarriages after being vaccinated, arguing that the public was intentionally kept in the dark about transmission risks, child necessity, and overall side effects.
The conversation pivots to politics as Rogan discusses President Joe Biden's pre-emptive pardon of Anthony Fauci, covering potential criminal liability from 2014 to 2024. Rogan emphasizes how unusual it is to grant a 10-year sweeping pardon to someone who has not yet been charged or convicted of a crime, contrasting it with traditional end-of-term presidential pardons. He links the 2014 start date of the pardon to President Barack Obama's moratorium on gain-of-function research, asserting that Fauci skirted restrictions by routing funding through EcoHealth Alliance to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
- **Cytokine Storm Allegation**: Defined in the discussion as a violent immune response to the vaccine during the first trimester, which Rogan claims increases miscarriage risks.
- **Scope of the Fauci Pardon**: Covers a 10-year span (2014–2024), coinciding with the timeline of federal gain-of-function research bans and the subsequent COVID-19 outbreak.
- **Historical Comparison**: Rogan contrasts pre-emptive waivers with conventional pardons, which usually apply to convicted individuals or political donors after serving sentence portions.
---
[18:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=1085s) Controversy Surrounding AZT and Early AIDS Treatments
The dialogue turns to Anthony Fauci’s earlier career during the 1980s HIV/AIDS epidemic. Rogan argues that AZT (azidothymidine), an aggressive chemotherapy drug initially shelved because of extreme toxicity in cancer trials, was prematurely pushed through regulatory channels to treat HIV patients. He asserts that asymptomatic individuals given high doses of AZT died rapidly due to the drug’s severe side effects rather than the virus itself. Simpson interjects with dark humor, questioning why society didn't just "stop fucking for like a year and a half" to eliminate AIDS instead of locking down decades later for COVID-19.
Rogan references Peter Duesberg, a tenured professor of molecular and cell biology at UC Berkeley who recently passed away. Duesberg maintained a controversial hypothesis that HIV was an opportunistic virus rather than the sole direct cause of AIDS, contending that heavy usage of recreational drugs like amyl nitrates ("poppers") and methamphetamine severely compromised immune systems within the gay community. Rogan notes that Duesberg became an academic pariah, losing his research funding and graduate students due to his non-mainstream stance.
- **AZT Toxicity**: Rogan describes AZT as a failed chemotherapy agent repurposed for HIV, alleging high doses caused fatal bone marrow toxicity in asymptomatic patients.
- **Peter Duesberg's Hypotheses**: Former Berkeley professor who argued AIDS was caused by long-term recreational drug use and immune depletion rather than HIV alone.
- **Academic Backlash**: Duesberg faced professional ostracization and loss of research grants after publishing his anti-HIV/AIDS hypotheses in outlets like *SPIN* magazine.
---
[23:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=1398s) RFK Jr., Foster Care Experiments, and Vaccine Integrity
Simpson asks why Fauci hasn't faced legal prosecution if these historical allegations are documented. Rogan points to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s book, *The Real Anthony Fauci*, describing its detailed investigative claims regarding clinical trials conducted on vulnerable populations. Specifically, Rogan highlights reports of experimental HIV treatments administered to foster children in New York state, arguing that institutionalized children without parental oversight were subjected to hazardous trial drugs.
Rogan reflects on his own evolving perspective on RFK Jr., admitting he initially dismissed him as an "anti-vaccine nutter" while living in California. However, after examining Kennedy's background as an environmental attorney—where he successfully sued corporate polluters to clean up the East River in New York—Rogan came to respect his research. The hosts detail how Kennedy was drawn into the vaccine debate after mothers concerned about mercury contamination approached him at environmental rallies, pushing him to investigate thimerosal and vaccine adjuvants like aluminum.
- **Foster Care Clinical Trials**: Allegations made in RFK Jr.'s book regarding phase-1 drug testing on HIV-positive foster children in New York City institutions.
- **RFK Jr.'s Background**: Longtime environmental attorney credited with major legal victories cleaning up industrial pollution in New York waterways.
- **Adjuvants vs. Preservatives**: Discussion on historical ingredients in vaccines, such as thimerosal (ethylmercury) and aluminum compounds used to stimulate immune responses.
---
[28:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=1683s) Scientific Fraud, Funded Research, and State Regulations
The conversation shifts to scientific credibility and financial conflicts of interest. Rogan brings up news regarding a prominent Danish researcher, Dr. Poul Thorsen, a co-author of a widely cited 2002 *New England Journal of Medicine* study involving 500,000 children that found no link between the MMR vaccine and autism. Rogan notes that Thorsen was extradited and indicted on federal wire fraud and money laundering charges for misdirecting research funds, using it as an example of corrupt incentives within industry-funded science.
The hosts compare modern pharmaceutical funding dynamics to historical precedents, such as the 1960s sugar industry paying Harvard scientists to shift the blame for heart disease away from sugar and onto saturated fats and cholesterol. Simpson notes how cheaply influence can be bought, joking about how little money it takes to buy off researchers or politicians. The segment closes with a discussion on state-level lobbying, specifically targeting recent bans on hemp-derived THC products in Texas, which Rogan attributes to heavy lobbying from the traditional alcohol industry trying to offset declining alcohol consumption.
- **Danish Autism Study Indictment**: Danish physician Poul Thorsen co-authored key MMR safety papers before being indicted on federal charges of wire fraud and money laundering.
- **Sugar Industry Precedent**: Mention of mid-century corporate-funded studies that successfully diverted public focus from sugar to dietary fats regarding heart disease.
- **Texas THC Ban**: Rogan attributes legislative restrictions on hemp-derived cannabinoids to alcohol industry lobbies protecting market share as alcohol consumption drops.
<ElicitationsGroup message="Where would you like to take this transcript walkthrough next?">
<Elicitation label="Summarize the key political arguments regarding federal pardons" query="Summarize the core political arguments made in this segment about pre-emptive presidential pardons and gain-of-function research."/>
<Elicitation label="Explore the historical claims about AZT and early HIV trials" query="Give a detailed breakdown of the claims made regarding AZT, Peter Duesberg, and 1980s HIV/AIDS treatment controversies."/>
<Elicitation label="Continue to the next part of the transcript" query="Please generate the next walkthrough part for this episode."/>
</ElicitationsGroup>
[30:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=1823s) ADD, Adderall, and the Standardized Schooling System
Joe Rogan and Brian Simpson open with a discussion on how ubiquitous drug use is in modern society, pointing out that even if people avoid illegal substances, they are often on legally prescribed pharmaceuticals. Rogan notes how easy it is to acquire prescriptions for powerful stimulants like Adderall simply by telling a doctor you cannot concentrate, essentially granting legal access to pharmaceutical-grade speed. Simpson mentions how widespread Adderall usage is among college and high school students before revealing that he was diagnosed with ADD as a child. However, Simpson shares that he dislikes taking the prescribed medication because of how it makes him feel, expressing skepticism over whether ADD is even a real medical condition.
Rogan argues that ADD is not a disease, but rather a reflection of people having different thought processes and natural boredom when forced to focus on uninteresting tasks. He emphasizes that individuals diagnosed with ADD can exhibit intense hyperfocus when engaged in something they genuinely enjoy—a trait he considers a "superpower." Simpson agrees, noting that his ability to focus depends entirely on his personal interest or an immediate sense of urgency. The two debate the societal definition of ADD, concluding that society labels it a "disorder" primarily because it interferes with performing tedious, repetitive jobs or sitting through unengaging school classes. Simpson jokingly adds that his biggest issue is an intense aversion to paperwork and bureaucratic forms.
The conversation pivots to alternative education models. Simpson recalls a school model discussed by author Thom Hartmann where children who struggled in traditional classrooms were placed in an unstructured environment. Instead of a rigid curriculum, teaching was tailored to answer the students' specific questions as they arose, forcing them to learn fundamental subjects organically to satisfy their curiosity. Simpson compares it to "Professor X's academy" for unique kids. Rogan adds that the current standardized schooling system was originally engineered by the Rockefellers to train compliant factory workers rather than foster genuine intellect, creating an environment that inherently frustrates energetic children.
- Powerful prescription stimulants like Adderall are widely used across high schools and universities.
- Rogan views hyperfocus on passion projects as a superpower rather than a medical deficit.
- Simpson references Thom Hartmann's discussion on experimental school models for children with attention differences.
- Rogan asserts that modern public education was designed under Rockefeller influence to train disciplined industrial workers.
[35:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=2125s) Money, Political Scams, and Campaign Fundraising
The discussion expands into a broader criticism of systemic corruption, with Simpson half-jokingly observing that the entire world feels like a series of interconnected scams. Rogan counters that basic, direct transactions—like buying eggs directly from a farmer—are honest, but agrees that scams become rampant at the higher echelons of corporate and governmental power. They express disbelief at how career politicians turn public office into lifetime professions, amassing net worths in the hundreds of millions of dollars through suspiciously adept stock trading that mimics market movements regardless of political party.
Rogan brings up comedian Joe DeRosa, who previously worked for the Texas State Senate and shared stories regarding the massive volume of political donations and backroom payouts politicians handle daily. Rogan notes that a politician's job consists mostly of endless fundraising. Simpson admits to making the mistake of donating to a politician recently, only to be bombarded with relentless daily emails begging for additional money. Rogan points out that political parties systematically rely on fearmongering—telling voters the sky is falling—to keep campaign donations flowing continuously.
- Career politicians frequently achieve massive wealth through stock trades that mirror major market trends.
- Comedian Joe DeRosa's background in the Texas Senate provided insider insight into the constant cycle of political fundraising.
- Political campaigns leverage manufactured panic to incentivize continuous small-dollar donations.
[38:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=2299s) DOGE, USAID, and Foreign Policy Fronts
Rogan highlights suspicious political fundraising mechanics, describing reports of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) using names from old donor databases to attribute large fake political donations without the individuals' knowledge. He connects this tactic to broad systemic financial opacity uncovered by Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) while auditing government entities like USAID. Rogan explains that billions in taxpayer funds move cyclically through foreign aid, Ukraine packages, and various non-profit networks with virtually no receipts or tracking.
Simpson recalls discussing Musk's audits during a previous appearance on the podcast, noting his prediction that Musk would face severe blowback as soon as he touched "real money." They discuss the immense personal, financial, and political toll Musk experienced after taking on institutional fraud. Rogan notes that while public perception initially framed Musk as a "free-speech freedom fighter" and modern-day Nikola Tesla building rockets and electric vehicles, political entanglements inevitably turn hostile once an individual stops being useful to those in power.
The dialogue shifts deeper into foreign policy as Rogan introduces the analysis of researcher Mike Benz regarding USAID (United States Agency for International Development). Rogan explains that despite its charitable branding, USAID acts as a covert front for intelligence operations and regime change overseas, funding foreign rebel groups and operations deemed "too dirty for the CIA." Simpson expresses shock at the vast array of non-profits operating globally, while Rogan emphasizes that while some genuine charities exist—such as Sea Shepherd fighting illegal commercial whaling—much of the institutional money labeled as "foreign aid" serves hidden political agendas.
- Campaign finance watchdogs have identified instances where previous donors' identities were attached to unverified lump-sum contributions.
- Elon Musk's DOGE audits highlighted billions of dollars in untracked foreign and domestic spending.
- Mike Benz's research frames USAID as an agency utilized for covert foreign regime change rather than standard humanitarian aid.
- Sea Shepherd Conservation Society is cited by Rogan as a legitimate non-profit fighting illegal commercial whaling operations disguised as research.
[43:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=2623s) Viral Clips on Political Corruption
Closing the segment, Simpson brings up a viral internet meme featuring an African politician giving a candid news interview about political corruption. Simpson quotes the politician's humorous stance: "Corruption is not bad. Corruption is only bad if I'm not involved." Intrigued, Rogan asks to play the video clip in the studio to listen to the original audio.
Upon reviewing the footage, Rogan points out that the context of the clip is likely being misunderstood or taken out of context for comedic effect. He notes that the politician appears to be mocking or describing the hypocritical mindset of corrupt officials who defend system fraud only when they personally profit from it, rather than advocating for corruption outright. Simpson admits he had never looked deeper into the full context of the video beyond the popular clip.
- The viral clip features an African politician delivering a quote regarding the subjective perception of political corruption.
- Rogan emphasizes how easily short video clips are taken out of context on social media to alter their original meaning.
<ElicitationsGroup message="Explore related topics from this episode:">
<Elicitation label="Summarize the next section of JRE #2548" query="Write a detailed, faithful walkthrough for part 4 of Joe Rogan Experience #2548 with Brian Simpson."/>
<Elicitation label="Break down Mike Benz's claims about USAID" query="Explain Mike Benz's analysis of USAID, foreign aid, and regime change in detail."/>
</ElicitationsGroup>
[44:35](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=2675s) The Samsonba Oaye Quote and Political Corruption
Joe Rogan and Brian Simpson revisit a quote discussed earlier from human rights activist Samsonba Oaye. Joe reflects on how his immediate instinct was that Oaye did not sound like a "scumbag" or a corrupt thief, but rather a deeply frustrated activist using irony and exaggerated rhetoric to point out how people readily defend corruption once they benefit from it. Simpson agrees with the premise, emphasizing how political motivations warp people over time.
Joe outlines the slippery slope of political corruption: a politician enters office with relatively decent intentions, but after struggling with mortgages, car payments, and tuition while watching peers get dirty rich, they compromise "just a little bit" for their district. Before they know it, corporations are buying influence, union busting, or pulling them into dark rooms with leverage.
```
SLIPPERY SLOPE OF POLITICAL CORRUPTION
[ Financial Pressure ] ---> Struggles with mortgage, kids' tuition & car leases
│
▼
[ Rationalization ] ---> "I'll do a little shenanigans; it helps the district."
│
▼
[ Corporate Capture ] ---> Accepting bribes, favoring corporate union-busting
│
▼
[ Total Compromise ] ---> Ensnared by honeytraps, kompromat, & Epstein-style leverage
```
Joe and Simpson shift to discuss how kompromat and blackmail operate in politics—whether it is Jeffrey Epstein-style traps, extramarital affairs, or unknowingly leaking info to foreign spies. Joe mentions honeypots like "Fang Fang," the Chinese spy who compromised high-profile California politicians, while poking fun at Simpson for not knowing the story.
- **Samsonba Oaye:** Used hyperbole and irony to highlight how citizens defend systemic corruption when it benefits their own pockets.
- **Blackmail Mechanics:** Compromising material (honeytraps, underage scandals, secret recordings) is used to force targeted legislation through congress.
- **James O'Keefe:** Mentioned by Joe as an example of sting operations catching public figures off-guard, though Simpson admits to avoiding news to keep his comedy perspectives "uncorrupted."
---
[47:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=2828s) Congressional Freeze-Ups and the Obsession with Power
The conversation turns to career politicians who refuse to retire despite advanced age or failing health. Joe brings up Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, laughing over absurd internet rumors that McConnell had passed away, before bringing up actual viral footage of McConnell freezing completely motionless on the Senate floor for extended periods.
Simpson and Joe marvel at how bizarre it is to watch an 81-year-old senator sit frozen while colleagues move around him, joking that his handlers look like they are pressing a remote button to make him vote. Joe recalls an incident where McConnell signaled the wrong vote (a thumbs up instead of a thumbs down) until an aide corrected him mid-stride. They compare this desperate grip on authority to other aging political figures.
> "What is it about power? They want it, and they can't give it up to the last drop." — **Brian Simpson**
- **Mitch McConnell:** Spent extended periods completely motionless on the Senate floor; famously froze mid-press-conference in 2023.
- **Dianne Feinstein:** Continued serving in the Senate while using a wheelchair and experiencing severe cognitive decline before her death in 2023.
- **Ruth Bader Ginsburg:** Retained her Supreme Court seat until her death at age 87 in 2020 despite severe health battles.
- **Financial Motivation vs. Identity:** Simpson notes that multi-millionaire politicians should retire to enjoy their families, but Joe explains that power becomes their entire identity, and standard political salaries ($174,000/year) are quickly surpassed by insider trading and committee perks.
---
[52:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=3168s) Moses, DMT, and the Origin of Religious Revelations
Producer Jamie Pullin brings up the biblical account of Moses and the Burning Bush in Exodus 3, leading to a deep dive into ancient scriptures and psychedelic theories. Jamie recaps how Moses encountered a bush on fire that was not consumed, heard an angel of God, removed his shoes on holy ground, and eventually received the Ten Commandments on stone tablets.
Joe brings up a prominent hypothesis developed by Benny Shanon, a professor of psychology at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. The theory suggests that the "burning bush" was actually an *Acacia* tree—a plant rich in $N,N$-Dimethyltryptamine (DMT)—and that Moses experienced a profound psychedelic vision rather than a literal divine encounter.
Simpson questions how any single person in the ancient world could return from the woods claiming to have spoken directly to God and convince an entire population to follow strict new laws. He draws a direct line between ancient prophets and modern religious founders like Joseph Smith, noting that it takes extraordinary charisma—or an easily manipulated audience—to pull off such a feat.
- **Exodus 3:** Details Moses encountering the burning bush on Mount Horeb/Sinai.
- **Acacia Specie:** Native to the Sinai Peninsula; contains high concentrations of the hallucinogenic compound DMT.
- **Joseph Smith:** Founder of Mormonism who claimed to have uncovered golden plates delivered by the angel Moroni in 1827.
- **Literacy in Antiquity:** Jamie notes how rare written language (such as cuneiform or early Hebrew script) was among the general populace, making written tablets seem miraculous or magical to common people.
---
[56:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=3387s) Cult Dynamics, Yoga Gurus, and Stand-Up Comics
Joe and Simpson discuss why people succumb to cults and manipulative leaders. Joe notes that while he and Simpson are inherently skeptical, low-trust individuals who question authority, many people lack confidence and easily fall under the sway of charismatic figures. Joe shares a story about almost buying the One World Theatre in Austin, Texas, which was tied to a local cult led by a former hypnotist and adult film actor who built a following out of his yoga studio.
They discuss Bikram Choudhury, the founder of Bikram Yoga, who used his position as a spiritual master to build a fortune, acquire a fleet of Rolls-Royces, and sexually abuse his followers. Simpson points out a consistent pattern in almost all cult structures: eventually, the leader claims divine authority to sleep with the followers' wives or daughters.
They close this segment reflecting on how many stand-up comedians come from extreme religious backgrounds or actual cults. Simpson and Joe list several comics who escaped these environments, noting that high-control religious upbringings often breed comedians with extreme anti-authoritarian streaks.
- **Bikram Choudhury:** Founder of Bikram Hot Yoga; subject of the 2019 Netflix documentary detailing allegations of sexual assault, harassment, and cult-like control over students.
- **Comics Raised in High-Control Environments:**
- **Ari Shaffir:** Raised in an ultra-Orthodox Jewish family, studied at a yeshiva in Israel for 12 hours a day before abandoning orthodoxy in his early 20s to pursue stand-up comedy.
- **Kurt Metzger & Abby Rosenquist:** Raised in or adjacent to strict religious sects/cults, using comedy as an outlet for their anti-authoritarian views.
<FollowUp label="Explore Ari Shaffir's transition from Orthodox Judaism to stand-up comedy" query="Tell me more about Ari Shaffir's background in Orthodox Judaism, his departure from religion, and how it shaped his stand-up comedy career."/>
[59:35](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=3575s) Liberal Women, Non-Parents, and Nietzsche’s Slave Morality
Joe Rogan and Brian Simpson open with a discussion on how people without children—specifically liberal women, though Rogan notes it can apply to Republicans as well—often redirect their nurturing instincts into scolding the world. Rogan posits that women with no children sometimes attempt to treat the entire planet like a child they never had, worrying endlessly about politics, rights, immigration, and the environment. Simpson pushes back slightly, pointing out that caring about those issues sounds like a fundamentally good thing, though Rogan clarifies it becomes toxic when used as a justification to act like an asshole toward others.
This leads Simpson to bring up a philosophical concept he recently heard about: Friedrich Nietzsche’s concept of "master morality" versus "slave morality" from his 1887 work *On the Genealogy of Morality*. Rogan pulls up the exact definitions on screen to break down how master morality is an active, self-affirming system created by the ruling class—defining "good" through strength, beauty, and success—while slave morality is a reactive, defensive system born out of deep-seated resentment and powerlessness.
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ NIETZSCHE'S MORALITY TYPES │
└────────────────────┬────────────────────┘
│
┌──────────────────────────┴──────────────────────────┐
▼ ▼
┌───────────────────────┐ ┌───────────────────────┐
│ MASTER MORALITY │ │ SLAVE MORALITY │
├───────────────────────┤ ├───────────────────────┤
│ • Inward & Active │ │ • Reactive & Defensive│
│ • Rooted in Strength │ │ • Born of Resentment │
│ • Defined by Power │ │ • Rejects Master │
└───────────────────────┘ └───────────────────────┘
```
Simpson argues that modern "cancel culture" stems directly from this slave morality dynamic. He explains that people naturally look for a socially acceptable excuse to indulge their own cruelty and "exercise their nastiness." By labeling someone else as morally evil, they grant themselves permission to engage in atrocious behavior they would normally condemn—such as screaming at someone's children or burning down a house—simply because the victim voted differently or displayed a controversial bumper sticker.
* **Master Morality:** Defined by the strong and noble using internal traits (power, courage, wealth). "Bad" is simply low or plain, not inherently evil.
* **Slave Morality:** Formed out of resentment toward the strong. Defines the master's traits as "evil," and praises meekness, humility, and obedience as "good."
* **Cancel Culture Paradox:** While traditional slave morality champions forgiveness and empathy, Rogan notes that modern cancel culture entirely lacks both.
---
[01:04:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=3849s) Human Weakness, Empathy, and "Captain Save-a-Hoe"
Transitioning into human nature, Rogan and Simpson debate whether the impulse to judge and persecute others stems from psychological weakness or universal human design. Simpson argues it is a weakness not to look objectively at why one is upset. Rogan counters that everyone suffers from subconscious blind spots. As an example, Rogan points out how people react when they hear someone died: the immediate, instinctual reaction is to ask *how* they died, often searching for a reason to rationalize why they shouldn’t feel deeply saddened—such as learning the person died doing something foolish like "strapping themselves to a rocket."
The conversation turns to double standards regarding empathy and death based on gender. Simpson admits he has the "Captain Save-a-Hoe gene" passed down dominantly from both sides of his family, making him an absolute softie when women cry. Rogan notes that society feels far less sympathy when men die doing reckless, stupid acts—like running with the bulls in Pamplona and taking a horn to the rear—whereas both men instinctively feel protective and sad when women are harmed. Simpson jokes that while his deep empathy makes him a nice person, it has also allowed him to be heavily manipulated by the wrong women in the past.
* **The "Captain Save-a-Hoe" Gene:** Simpson describes himself as hyper-susceptible to female tears, admitting women can easily manipulate him into giving them whatever they want.
* **Empathy Gaps:** Both men agree that society generally finds physical comedy or fatal stupidity far funnier when it happens to men than when it happens to women.
---
[01:06:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=3984s) Street Fights and the Sixth Street Knockout
The discussion shifts to viral street fight videos when Rogan brings up a wild clip he recently saw from Sixth Street in Austin, Texas. Rogan describes a wide-built Mexican woman who got into a street brawl and began flatlining people with vicious right hands, comparing her throwing mechanics to UFC legend Amanda Nunes. Simpson quickly pulls up viral videos from the account *Texas Street Fights* to locate the exact clip.
<Image alt="Street fight on Sixth Street in Austin, Texas" caption="Sixth Street street fight chaos" src="image_agent_tag_1"/>
---
As Rogan and Simpson review the video, Rogan points out the tactical breakdown of why most street fighters fail versus why this specific woman succeeded. Most untrained fighters lean backward while throwing punches, which eliminates all leverage and power. In contrast, this woman tucked her chin, drove off her back foot, and rotated her hips into a brutal right hook that knocked her opponent out cold. Rogan notes with concern how the victim's head bounced directly off the concrete pavement, pointing out that head-to-pavement impacts are where street fights turn into accidental homicides.
* **Sixth Street Violence:** Rogan clarifies he never hangs out on Sixth Street in Austin personally, but loves analyzing the fight mechanics in viral footage.
* **Punching Technique:** Rogan breaks down how the woman tucked her chin and engaged her hips to throw a legitimate power shot, followed by a heavy hip toss and ground-and-pound.
* **Concussion Signs:** Simpson and Rogan point out the unconscious victim's foot twitching on the ground, confirming a severe concussion from her head bouncing off the asphalt.
---
[01:09:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=4188s) Brian Simpson’s Bouncer Days in San Diego
Reflecting on the terrifying reality of street fights, Simpson states how glad he is to be at an age where he no longer fights anyone. While Rogan competed in organized martial arts matches, Simpson shares that he rarely fought in the streets unless he was working. He recalls his last serious street fight, which occurred years ago while he was working as a doorman at an Irish pub on Adams Avenue in San Diego.
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ SAN DIEGO PUB FIGHT TIMELINE │
└────────────────────┬────────────────────┘
│
┌──────────────────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────┐
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
┌───────────────────────┐ ┌───────────────────────┐ ┌───────────────────────┐
│ ID DENIAL & WAIT │ │ UNPROVOKED BLIND │ │ POLICE INTERVENTION │
├───────────────────────┤ ├───────────────────────┤ ├───────────────────────┤
│ Boyfriend leaves for │ │ Boyfriend returns, │ │ Cops cuff both men; │
│ ID; drunk girlfriend │ │ sucker-punches Brian │ │ bar owner identifies │
│ chatters for an hour. │ │ against doorframe. │ │ Brian as the bouncer. │
└───────────────────────┘ └───────────────────────┘ └───────────────────────┘
```
A couple had approached the door, but the man lacked an ID. He went back to retrieve it, leaving his girlfriend inside to drink. For over an hour, the intoxicated girlfriend repeatedly came outside to talk Simpson's ear off, eventually leaving her cell phone on a small table next to him. When the boyfriend finally returned, he romantically picked up his girlfriend from behind. When Simpson turned and pointed to hand her the forgotten phone, the boyfriend completely unprovoked sucker-punched Simpson in the face, slamming his head against the wooden doorframe.
Simpson immediately fought back, beating the man severely until San Diego police arrived and placed both men in handcuffs. The bar staff quickly intervened to tell the officers that Simpson was the bouncer and had been attacked without cause. What stunned Simpson most was the attacker’s reaction: while being beaten, the man seemed genuinely, utterly bewildered—asking, *"Why are you doing this? What's happening?"*—as if he had zero psychological connection to the fact that he had just sucker-punched a bouncer in the face seconds earlier.
* **Venue Location:** Adams Avenue, San Diego—a dense bar district similar to Austin's Sixth Street.
* **Emotional Dysregulation:** Rogan and Simpson speculate the attacker was either heavily under the influence of drugs or suffering from severe mental illness and emotional dysregulation.
* **Aftermath:** Simpson declined to press charges and let the police release the man. He later found out the same individual was arrested shortly after for beating up his girlfriend.
<ElicitationsGroup message="Explore further details or topics from this podcast clip:">
<Elicitation label="Explore Nietzsche's Morality Concepts" query="Can you break down Nietzsche's Master and Slave Morality concepts further and how they apply to modern culture?"/>
<Elicitation label="Analyze Martial Arts & Punching Technique" query="What are the mechanical differences Rogan mentioned regarding striking technique and generating power in a fight?"/>
</ElicitationsGroup>
[01:13:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=4402s) MMA Contacts, Dumb Deaths, and Uncontacted Island Hostility
Joe Rogan opens the segment by sharing how insane it is that fighters step into the UFC octagon wearing contact lenses. He recalls a young fighter—around 18 or 19 years old—who dropped a contact lens directly onto the mat during a match, picked it up, popped it right back into his eye, and subsequently developed a horrific staph infection in his eyeball. Simpson responds with dark comedy, noting that while he feels zero sympathy for adults doing dangerous, stupid things, there is a fine line. He breaks down his scale of dark humor: harmless stupid acts are hilarious, harmful stupid acts are a 50/50 split, but a harmful stupid act committed while trying to harm someone else—like slipping and breaking your leg while trying to throw a punch—is funny every single time.
This leads Simpson to express his frustration with vague death announcements. When someone passes away, Simpson insists on knowing the exact cause of death rather than hearing "it's a private family matter," because he needs to calculate how much empathy to feel. Rogan references a joke from his comedy set about the missionary who ventured to an uncontacted island to preach the Bible, only to be promptly killed by the natives. Simpson points out that deep down, most people respect the islanders' desire to mind their own business, acknowledging the massive effort required for a tribe to remain isolated from the modern world.
Rogan then explains the historical context behind the extreme hostility of the North Sentinelese people. He details the actions of Commander Maurice Vidal Portman, a 19th-century British officer and explorer whom Rogan describes as a "pervert." Portman visited the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, subjected the indigenous people to bizarre scientific measurements and photographic poses, and even penned explicit descriptions of their anatomy (such as writing that a man had testicles the size of a sparrow's egg). Portman also kidnapped two adults and four children from the island; the adults quickly died from introduced diseases to which they had no immunity, prompting the remaining children to be sent back—likely seeding deep-rooted trauma and hostility toward all future outsiders.
- **Fighter Eye Infection:** A 18-19-year-old fighter put a dropped contact lens back in his eye off a mat, leading to a severe ocular staph infection.
- **North Sentinel Island Population:** Rogan notes that North Sentinel Island is estimated to have a tiny population of roughly 39 people remaining.
- **Maurice Vidal Portman:** 19th-century British Royal Navy officer who documented and mistreated the Sentinelese and Andamanese people.
---
[01:16:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=4610s) The Devastation of European Diseases on Native Americans
The conversation shifts to the broader impact of introduced pathogens on isolated populations. Rogan pulls up data on Perplexity AI to investigate the mortality rate among Native Americans caused by European diseases following first contact. Reading from the search results, Rogan highlights that standard historical estimates indicate between 50% to 90% of indigenous populations in affected regions died in sweeping epidemics of smallpox, measles, influenza, and typhus, with some continent-wide estimates putting total losses as high as 90% to 95%.
Rogan and Simpson discuss the grim reality of living in an era without modern medicine or immunity. Rogan contrasts the hygiene and lifestyle of nomadic Native American tribes—such as the Comanche, who lived in open environments and moved frequently—with the unsanitary, squalid conditions of European cities. European urban centers were plagued by thrown chamber pots, streets filled with horse manure, and contaminated water supplies.
- **Native American Disease Mortality Rate:** 50% to 95% of the indigenous population perished due to introduced Old World pathogens.
- **Key Epidemic Diseases:** Smallpox, measles, influenza, typhus.
- **Lifestyle Contrast:** Nomadic Plains tribes (like the Comanche) moved constantly, whereas dense European cities suffered from pervasive fecal contamination in public streets and drinking water.
---
[01:19:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=4752s) Ignaz Semmelweis and the Persecution of Early Germ Theory
Rogan highlights the bizarre historical misconceptions regarding sickness, noting that for centuries, people blamed illness on "bad vapors," humors, or spiritual alignments rather than contaminated water or unwashed hands. He brings up the story of the first doctor to advocate for handwashing, marveling at how the medical establishment ridiculed and destroyed the man who potentially saved more lives than anyone in history.
Looking up the historical figure, Rogan reads the biography of Hungarian physician Ignaz Semmelweis. In 1847, while working at the Vienna General Hospital's first obstetrical clinic, Semmelweis discovered that requiring doctors to wash their hands in a chlorinated lime solution drastically reduced childbed fever (puerperal fever) deaths among new mothers. The doctor wards had previously suffered triple the mortality rate of the midwife-run wards because doctors were coming straight from dissections in the autopsy room to deliver babies without washing their hands. Despite his conclusive empirical data, his peers were offended by the implication that their hands were dirty and rejected his work because he could not yet provide a microscopic theoretical explanation.
The story takes a tragic turn as Rogan reads how Semmelweis suffered a mental breakdown in 1865, was committed to an asylum by his colleagues, was severely beaten by the asylum guards, and died 14 days later from a gangrenous infection in his hand. Simpson quips that he was "the Dr. Fauci of his time," though Rogan counters that he was actually the opposite—an anti-establishment truth-teller persecuted by his peers, who ironically died of the very type of infection he spent his life trying to prevent.
- **Ignaz Semmelweis (1818–1865):** Hungarian physician known as the "Savior of Mothers."
- **Vienna General Hospital (1847):** Introduced chlorinated lime handwashing, dropping maternal mortality rates dramatically.
- **Tragic Death:** Committed to an asylum in 1865, beaten by guards, and died 14 days later from gangrene resulting from a hand wound infection.
---
[01:22:41](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=4961s) Joseph Lister, Pasteur, and the Creation of Listerine
Rogan traces the evolution of germ theory from Semmelweis to Louis Pasteur—who formally proved the germ theory of disease—and then to English surgeon Joseph Lister. Lister applied Pasteur’s findings to pioneer antiseptic surgical techniques, using carbolic acid to sterilize surgical instruments and clean wounds, which revolutionized modern medicine.
While scrolling through Lister's massive Wikipedia entry, Rogan and Simpson verify that the brand name **Listerine** was indeed named directly after Joseph Lister in 1879 by Dr. Joseph Lawrence and Jordan Wheat Lambert as an surgical antiseptic, before later being marketed as a mouthwash. Simpson admires Lister's tireless work ethic, noting that he was a man who clearly was not lazy and got things done.
- **Louis Pasteur:** Confirmed germ theory, giving scientific backing to Semmelweis's earlier observations.
- **Joseph Lister (1827–1912):** Pioneer of antiseptic surgery using carbolic acid; namesake of Listerine.
- **Listerine Inception Year:** 1879.
---
[01:24:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=5051s) Mouthwash, Nitric Oxide, Beetroot, and Hygiene Overuse
Rogan brings up a fascinating physiological study he read regarding mouthwash and athletic performance. He explains that using strong antibacterial mouthwash can actually blunt athletic performance and recovery gains. Asking Perplexity to confirm the details, the search results reveal that antibacterial mouthwash wipes out essential oral bacteria responsible for converting dietary nitrates into nitrites, which the body relies on to synthesize **nitric oxide**. Nitric oxide is crucial for blood vessel dilation, regulation of blood pressure, and delivering oxygen to active muscles during exercise.
Rogan notes that many elite athletes drink beetroot juice shots before workouts specifically because beets are rich in dietary nitrites that boost nitric oxide. Simpson laughs about the dilemma, noting that a fighter might have to choose between having fresh breath or having the stamina to go into the fourth and fifth rounds, joking that "it's okay to be a funky breath champion."
They close the discussion by pondering the broader implications of modern hygiene over-sanitization. Simpson asks about fighters who intentionally don't wash their gear—recalling old-school Jiu-Jitsu practitioners who never washed their gi so it would smell like pungent ammonia to disorient opponents. Rogan speculates that humans' obsession with scrubbing away all bacteria with antibacterial soaps and mouthwash may actually be destroying the body's natural skin flora, leaving people *more* vulnerable to skin infections and health issues than if they relied on natural biological defenses.
- **Nitric Oxide Pathway:** Oral bacteria break down nitrates (found in beets and leafy greens) into nitrites $\rightarrow$ converted to nitric oxide $\rightarrow$ causes vasodilation and increased muscle oxygenation.
- **Antibacterial Mouthwash Effect:** Kills oral bacteria needed for the nitrate-to-nitrite conversion, potentially reducing endurance, pump, and athletic recovery.
- **Skin Flora Hypothesis:** Over-washing with harsh soaps strips the skin's protective microbiome, potentially increasing susceptibility to staph and fungal infections.
<ElicitationsGroup message="Where would you like to explore next?">
<Elicitation label="Explore the full story of Ignaz Semmelweis" query="Tell me the full detailed story of Ignaz Semmelweis, his hospital experiment with handwashing, and how the medical establishment reacted."/>
<Elicitation label="Break down how nitric oxide impacts exercise" query="Explain how nitric oxide works in the body during exercise, including the role of oral bacteria, nitrates, and vasodilation."/>
<Elicitation label="Detail the history of North Sentinel Island" query="What is the historical timeline of contacts and incidents on North Sentinel Island, including Maurice Vidal Portman and John Allen Chau?"/>
</ElicitationsGroup>
[01:28:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=5286s) Hygeine Theories and the World's Dirtiest Man
Brian Simpson and Joe Rogan begin by discussing animal hygiene, noting how dogs can go extended periods without washing unless they jump into a lake or pool. Simpson presents a theory that human bodies would naturally adapt to suppress body odor and skin issues if released into the wild, comparing it to how a domesticated pig quickly undergoes wild phenotypic changes once it escapes into nature. Rogan agrees that ancient history lacks records of widespread skin hygiene epidemics, which prompts them to discuss the famous case of Amou Haji, known as the world's dirtiest man.
The conversation turns to Amou Haji, an Iranian man who avoided washing for over 60 years and smoked animal feces out of a pipe alongside multiple cigarettes at once. Rogan looks up his story on Perplexity to verify if he truly died shortly after villagers finally persuaded him to bathe for the first time in decades. The search confirms he passed away a few months after taking a bath at age 94. While looking up the case, they stumble across a reference to "Dirty Dick"—the 18th-century London merchant Nathaniel Bentley—who refused to wash for the rest of his life after his fiancee died on their wedding day.
- **Pigs in the wild**: A domestic pig undergoes rapid biological transformations—growing coarse hair, tusks, and heightened aggression—shortly after escaping into the wild.
- **Amou Haji**: Died in 2022 at age 94 in Iran; went roughly 60 years without bathing and famously smoked dried animal dung.
- **Nathaniel Bentley ("Dirty Dick")**: An educated, multi-lingual 18th-century English merchant who stopped bathing entirely after his bride-to-be died on their wedding day.
[01:30:39](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=5439s) Renaming Lake Ontario and Great Lakes Trivia
Rogan brings up a news item regarding Lake Ontario, noting a proposal or joke about renaming it "Lake America," which leads the pair to question the motivation behind political naming decisions. Simpson suggests that high-profile geographic name changes are often engineered distractions meant to draw public attention away from complex foreign policy issues or military conflicts.
The discussion shifts to the geography of the Great Lakes. Simpson recites the classic mnemonic acronym "HOMES" (Huron, Ontario, Michigan, Erie, Superior) used to teach school children the names of the five lakes. Rogan expresses surprise at learning the lakes are melted glacial ice sheets left over from the last ice age, leading to a debate over how they connect to the ocean and how freshwater fish ended up inside them.
- **Great Lakes mnemonic**: **H**uron, **O**ntario, **M**ichigan, **E**rie, **S**uperior.
- **St. Lawrence Seaway**: Serves as the primary outlet connecting Lake Ontario and the rest of the Great Lakes system to the Atlantic Ocean.
- **Bull Sharks in Illinois**: Bull sharks are capable of surviving in fresh water and have been documented swimming up the Mississippi River as far inland as Illinois.
[01:33:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=5625s) Ice Age Melts, Evolution, and Prehistoric Fishing
Rogan raises a paradox regarding North American natural history: if 3/4 of the North American continent was covered under a mile-thick sheet of ice as recently as 11,000 to 12,000 years ago during the Younger Dryas period, how did distinct freshwater fish species populate the lakes so quickly? He questions whether marine fish could have evolved into purely freshwater species in just a few thousand years, or if anadromous species like salmon—which migrate between saltwater and freshwater—provided the evolutionary bridge.
Producer Jamie Pulls up archaeological records showing that humans were actively ice-fishing and catching freshwater species in North America toward the end of the last ice age. The data indicates that early inhabitants in central Alaska were harvesting specific freshwater species roughly 13,000 years ago, proving established freshwater ecosystems existed alongside human populations during the glacial retreat.
- **Younger Dryas Timeline**: Major glacial melting occurred roughly 11,600 to 12,800 years ago.
- **Archeological Evidence**: Evidence from central Alaska dated to ~13,000 years ago shows early human settlements catching burbot, northern pike, and whitefish.
[01:37:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=5831s) AI Models, Uncensored Technology, and China's Economic Model
After a brief, humorous banter about searching for adult content on AI search engines, the conversation pivots to open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) and global technological competition. Simpson notes that open-source AI models coming out of China often lack the restrictive moral guardrails placed on Western models, allowing for faster iteration and unrestricted development.
They analyze the fundamental economic difference between China and Western democracies. Simpson explains that while China utilizes capitalistic market mechanisms, it is not a true capitalist system because private business owners and billionaires hold no leverage over the ruling party. Rogan notes that high-profile figures who challenge the state face severe consequences or forced disappearance. Simpson argues that the Western outsourcing of manufacturing jobs rendered China's eventual economic dominance inevitable over a multi-generational timeline.
- **Manufacturing Offshoring**: Decades of relocating Western manufacturing capacity transferred critical supply chain dominance and industrial infrastructure to China.
- **Capital vs. State**: Unlike Western lobbying systems, Chinese capital cannot dictate policy or override government directives.
[01:39:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=5940s) Demographic Crises and Historic Authoritarian Atrocities
The duo examines China's demographic challenges, discussing reports that population figures may be significantly over-reported. Rogan highlights the long-term structural damage caused by the historical One-Child Policy, which created severe gender imbalances across generations. Simpson compares catastrophic government population management to historical totalitarian regimes, bringing up the atrocities committed by Khmer Rouge leader Pol Pot in Cambodia.
Reading through historical data, they review how Pol Pot's regime executed between 1.5 and 2 million people over just four years (1975–1979) through forced labor camps, deliberate starvation, and targeting educated citizens and minority groups. The discussion shifts to Muammar Gaddafi's dictatorship in Libya; Rogan notes that while Gaddafi ran an oppressive state, he provided baseline social benefits like free housing and subsidized overseas education. However, his push to abandon the US dollar for a pan-African gold currency ultimately preceded his violent overthrow in 2011.
- **Pol Pot (Khmer Rouge)**: Responsible for the deaths of 1.5 to 2 million Cambodians (~25% of the population) between 1975 and 1979 through mass purges of intellectuals, forced agrarian labor, and torture.
- **Muammar Gaddafi**: Dictator of Libya from 1969 to 2011; provided state-funded housing and education, but was killed by Western-backed rebels after attempting to shift African trade away from the US dollar.
Here is a detailed, faithful walkthrough of the transcript section.
[01:41:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=6110s) Foreign Policy, Currency Collapse, and the Disaster in Nepal
Joe Rogan and Brian Simpson continue discussing international affairs, with Rogan arguing that Muammar Gaddafi was ultimately betrayed by his own people after being manipulated into funding rebel forces to overthrow a dictatorship. Rogan notes that he will send Simpson work by Mike Benz regarding foreign interventions and hidden operations that are "too dirty for the CIA." Simpson admits he could use a primer on the topic, acknowledging that while it is easy to say the U.S. shouldn't murder leaders, the destabilization of the U.S. dollar as the world reserve currency would put the nation in serious trouble. Rogan points out that Gaddafi was also attempting to establish a unified "United States of Africa," an ambition Western powers were never going to allow.
Shifting gears to current disasters, Rogan brings up horrifying video footage from Nepal showing the aftermath of a catastrophic dam burst triggered by a massive avalanche. The clip shows a wall of mud and water rushing over a landscape at terrifying speed, blowing through trees and leveling buildings as people desperately try to run away. Rogan notes that the sheer velocity and finality of the destruction left over 400 people missing, with the movement of earth and water being so massive it even registered a 5.2 magnitude reading on the Richter scale.
- **Geopolitical Takeaways:** Gaddafi's push to move away from the U.S. dollar and unify Africa served as key catalysts for Western interventions.
- **Nepal Disaster Specs:** The avalanche-induced dam failure produced mudflows moving fast enough to flatten entire structures in seconds, leaving hundreds missing and creating a 5.2 seismic event.
---
[01:45:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=6306s) The Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis and the Great Flood
Rogan connects the sudden destruction in Nepal to geological theories proposed by Randall Carlson regarding the end of the last ice age roughly 11,800 years ago. During that era, North America was covered under ice sheets over a mile thick. Carlson's theory suggests Earth passed through a dense comet stream, suffering multiple impacts across the globe. Physical core samples taken from around the world show a distinct boundary layer at 11,800 years containing rare cosmic materials—such as high concentrations of iridium and micro-diamonds formed by extreme pressure.
Rogan explains that these impact formations are similar to *trinitite*, the glass-like residual layer discovered at the Trinity nuclear test site caused by intense thermal energy and shockwaves. When comets slammed into the North American ice sheets, billions of gallons of ice melted almost instantly, creating apocalyptic flash floods that scoured the landscape, carved out features like the Grand Canyon, moved massive boulders thousands of miles, and left behind the Great Lakes. Simpson is shocked by the timeline, realizing these events occurred relatively recently in Earth's history rather than millions of years ago.
- **Geological Evidence:** High levels of iridium, micro-diamonds, and shock glass (trinitite-like materials) are present in the 11,800-year-old boundary layer worldwide.
- **Mechanism of Flooding:** Impact kinetic energy melted mile-thick glaciers instantly, driving massive water flows across North America that formed the Great Lakes.
---
[01:47:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=6471s) Meteors, the Tunguska Event, and Insurance Myths
Rogan details how Earth regularly passes through debris streams like the Taurid meteor shower—typically from September to November, peaking around mid-October—and the June stream. While most passage through these streams yields harmless shooting stars, larger impacts periodically cause civilization-resetting catastrophes. As a historical example, Rogan points to the 1908 Tunguska event in Siberia, where a meteor airburst detonated above the ground with enough pressure to flatten an entire forest, leaving a landscape that looks like a nuclear blast zone to this day.
```
TAURID METEOR STREAM CYCLE
June Stream Sept - Nov Stream (Peak ~Oct 10)
+-----------+ +--------------------------------+
| Airbursts | | Earth Intersects Comet Debris |
+-----------+ +--------------------------------+
| |
v v
Tunguska Event (1908) Civilization Reset Risk
```
The conversation turns lighthearted as Simpson and Rogan joke about modern meteor strikes penetrating homes and how insurance companies handle such events. Simpson quips that insurance companies will label a falling meteorite an "act of God" to deny coverage, while Rogan notes that policies usually categorize them under "falling objects." Simpson jokes that offering specialized meteor insurance would be a pure windfall for insurers: *"You got one guy every 30 years that needs meteor coverage. You make a windfall."*
- **Tunguska Event:** A meteor airburst over Siberia in 1908 flattened thousands of square miles of forest without directly striking the ground.
- **Taurid Meteor Shower:** Earth passes through the stream twice a year (June and September–November, with peaks around October 10).
---
[01:51:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=6717s) African Dust in Texas and Tim Dillon's Satire
Rogan mentions other bizarre natural phenomena, such as a major El Niño cycle and the regular occurrence of Saharan dust blowing thousands of miles across the Atlantic Ocean from Africa to blanket the skies over Texas. Simpson expresses surprise at how out-of-the-loop he feels, admitting he avoids watching news and even finds it difficult to listen to Rogan's podcast because it feels odd hearing a friend speak without being able to chime in.
Simpson explains that he generally avoids watching comedy or stand-up on his own time, but both he and Rogan share a deep appreciation for comedian Tim Dillon. Rogan praises Dillon as an absolute master of modern rants, highlighting a specific clip where Dillon lambastes Donald Trump's reaction to honoring a hero lifeguard in the Oval Office. During the meeting, Trump bluntly told the saved child and his parents: *"You know, when you see that, I don't know if I'd do it. I wouldn't... You're lucky I wasn't on that day."* Rogan and Simpson laugh over Dillon's breakdown of the sheer absurdity of the moment, noting how Dillon's unfiltered satrical commentary provides unmatched levity in modern media.
- **Saharan Dust Transit:** Air currents regularly transport massive plumes of sand and mineral dust from the Sahara Desert across the Atlantic into Texas.
- **Tim Dillon's Oval Office Breakdown:** Highlights Trump's honest commentary during a press ceremony honoring a heroic lifeguard alongside the rescued child and family.
<ElicitationsGroup message="Explore related topics from this episode:">
<Elicitation label="Deep-dive into the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis" query="Can you explain the detailed evidence behind the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis and the Taurid meteor stream?"/>
<Elicitation label="Learn about the 1908 Tunguska Event" query="What caused the 1908 Tunguska event in Siberia and what were its lasting effects?"/>
<ElicitationsGroup/>
[01:57:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=7025s) Tiger Woods, Pain Management, and the Toll of Modern Athletics
Joe Rogan and Brian Simpson begin by reflecting on comic Dave Attell’s off-the-cuff, unscripted brilliance. Rogan admires how Attell works purely "off the dome" while stone-cold sober. Simpson points out that while some people assume comedians are funnier when using drugs, stand-up comedy requires sharp presence. Rogan agrees, noting that alcohol or cocaine might give a comic initial stage courage, but overindulgence ultimately strips away control.
The conversation transitions to Tiger Woods after Rogan mentions a recent, concerning video of the golf icon looking visually unwell. Simpson defends Woods, blaming poor camera lighting, his extreme hat tan line, or a new beard. However, Rogan argues that the visible physical decline is consistent with someone who has endured severe trauma, multiple spinal fusions, and notorious DUI arrests tied to prescription pain medication. They discuss how professional athletes who suffer catastrophic injuries often face a brutal dilemma: endure agonizing daily pain or depend permanently on powerful opioids like OxyContin.
- Tiger Woods suffered severe leg damage during his major single-vehicle rollover car crash, alongside undergoing multiple spinal fusion procedures over his career.
- The hosts differentiate standard prescription opioids like OxyContin from synthetic options like fentanyl, highlighting how athletes are frequently prescribed high-potency painkillers to stay active.
---
[02:01:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=7264s) Toradol Injections and the Hidden Physical Cost of the NFL
The discussion turns to the aggressive medical interventions used in professional sports to mask pain on game day. Simpson references an episode of the football podcast *Raw Room*, where former players discussed how offensive linemen frequently take anti-inflammatory injections starting in high school just to perform. Rogan explains the mechanics of high-dose non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) like Toradol (ketorolac) and cortisone injections, noting that UFC fighter Anthony "Fluffy" Hernandez recently took an injection right before a fight to numb a shoulder injury.
Looking at an image of an overturned football helmet filled to the brim with single-use injection syringes, Rogan reads an excerpt from an article featuring former Philadelphia Eagles center Jamaal Jackson. Jackson famously remarked that an athlete's first day in the NFL is the last day they will ever be 100% healthy. Rogan highlights that Toradol is widely used across professional locker rooms—with reports that half the Pittsburgh Steelers roster once received weekly shots—despite being restricted in several European countries due to risks of internal bleeding and stomach ulcers.
- **Jamaal Jackson:** Eight-year NFL veteran who suffered a torn ACL in 2009 and a torn triceps in 2010.
- **Toradol Risks:** Powerful NSAID associated with severe gastrointestinal complications, including ulcers and internal bleeding.
- **Physical Toll:** Both collision-sport athletes and fighters routinely enter competition with underlying joint, neck, back, or brain injuries.
---
[02:05:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=7508s) CTE, Retirement Anxiety, and Post-Career Transition
Rogan and Simpson discuss the historical dangers of football, noting how players frequently died on the field during the leather-helmet era before modern protective gear was introduced. While modern helmets prevented immediate fatal skull fractures, Rogan points out an ironic twist: better armor allowed players to hit harder, likely worsening the long-term prevalence of Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE). Despite these known risks, Simpson notes that athletes rarely quit because the high-stakes thrill of high-level competition is impossible to replicate.
Rogan explains that retiring at 35 or 36 leaves athletes facing decades of normal life where everything feels painfully boring compared to the high-adrenaline rush of performing in front of stadium crowds. This extreme thrill threshold drives fighters to stay in the ring far past their prime, citing examples like B.J. Penn and Anderson Silva who took fights long after their peak years, in contrast to rare exceptions like Floyd Mayweather Jr. or Georges St-Pierre who retired on top.
> "Your first day in the league is the last day you'll ever be 100% healthy." — *Jamaal Jackson, former NFL center*
- **Contractual Traps:** UFC fighters on lucrative multi-fight deals often keep fighting for guaranteed high paychecks even after suffering traumatic knockouts and losing their competitive edge.
- **Bare-Knuckle Boxing:** Aging MMA fighters frequently transition into bare-knuckle fighting for late-career paydays, creating brutal visual gore that Rogan finds difficult to watch.
---
[02:08:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=7682s) Irene Aldana’s Horrific Gash at Noche UFC
The conversation turns to violent injuries in combat sports, with Rogan recalling one of the most gruesome cuts in UFC history. At *Noche UFC* inside the Sphere in Las Vegas, Mexican bantamweight Irene Aldana suffered a catastrophic facial cut during her bout against Norma Dumont. Rogan describes looking at Aldana's forehead in real time and seeing a split roughly five inches long that exposed her underlying skull structure.
Looking up photos of the fight, Simpson and Rogan marvel at Aldana's incredible toughness as she continued to march forward despite a mask of blood covering her face and a shattered nose. Rogan expresses shock that the ringside doctor or referee did not stop the bout to prevent further trauma. He notes that while blood pouring into a fighter's eyes is extremely painful and disorienting, referees typically only halt a fight for structural eye damage rather than routine lacerations.
- **Event:** Noche UFC (UFC 306) at the Sphere in Las Vegas, Nevada.
- **Matchup:** Irene Aldana vs. Norma Dumont.
- **Injury:** A massive vertical laceration along the forehead and hairline, accompanied by a broken nose, which left Aldana covered in blood for the remainder of the contest.
Here is a detailed and faithful walkthrough of the transcript segment.
---
[02:11:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=7872s) The Brutal Reality of Female Fighting and Ultimate Sacrifices in the Cage
Joe Rogan and Brian Simpson reflect on the immense physical toll taken by mixed martial artists, specifically discussing a female fighter who suffered a broken orbital bone on both sides of her face during a fight against Justin Gaethje. Rogan notes that she was unable to see out of her right eye after the very first round and ultimately retired from the sport following that September 2024 bout. Simpson observes that when a male fighter gets severe facial gashes, society views it as a badge of honor or "hot," whereas a woman sustaining that level of facial damage makes people react with horror. They agree that it is an extremely rough way to make a living, paying a heavy physical price for entertaining the fans with all-out "bangers."
- **Orbital Bone Injuries:** The fighter sustained broken orbital bones on both sides and lost vision in her right eye after Round 1.
- **Career Conclusion:** She retired immediately after the fight, with her record reflecting her final contest in September 2024.
- **Double Standard of Scars:** Simpson notes that facial gashes make men look like tough UFC fighters, while high-fashion modeling or looking like a normal woman is ruined by that degree of facial trauma.
---
[02:12:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=7960s) The Memory Guessing Game: Searching for Michael Chandler
Brian Simpson struggles intensely to recall the name of a specific UFC fighter he loves watching. He describes him as a fan favorite, extremely muscle-bound, white, and infamous for constantly screaming and bringing insane intensity to the cage. Rogan throws out several names to help him—including Mike Perry, Sean Strickland, and Khamzat Chimaev—while lightly mocking Simpson for being the ultimate "casual" who cannot remember fighters' names. Simpson insists that as soon as he says the name, Rogan will instantly recognize him. Rogan laughs about how fans get upset when Simpson is on Fight Companions for not paying close enough attention, while Simpson defends himself by admitting he never claimed to be anything more than a casual fan.
- **Fighter Descriptions:** White, muscle-bound, extremely intense, constantly screaming in the cage, and last seen fighting around the previous year.
- **Eliminated Names:** Mike Perry (now the Bare Knuckle Fighting Championship titleholder), Sean Strickland, Diego Silva/Erick Silva, and Khamzat Chimaev.
- **Fight Companion Backlash:** Rogan jokes that Simpson’s memory blank proves why fans get annoyed with his lack of deep MMA knowledge during live watch parties.
---
[02:14:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=8080s) Historical Football Violence and 1931 Government Intervention
While Simpson continues scanning his memory on his phone, Rogan pulls up a historical 1931 *Time* magazine article about the extreme danger and lethal violence of football during that era. The article detailed how 40 young men and boys died during the 1931 season alone, including a 13-year-old boy who tragically shot himself in the stomach after failing to make his team. The piece highlighted concerns over "versatility"—athletes jumping from football to basketball to baseball in a single year—which Yale Athletic Director John M. Kates argued was far too demanding for human anatomy to withstand. Rogan notes that President Franklin D. Roosevelt eventually had to step in to curb the roughness of the sport, though the rules and style of play back then were vastly different from modern football.
- **1931 Football Fatalities:** 40 deaths recorded in a single season, including a 13-year-old suicide over missing the roster cut.
- **Medical Hazards:** The article highlighted an athlete whose cold progressed to bronchitis, then to "pleurisy with effusions" (inflammation of the lung lining), linked to playing in freezing conditions.
- **Presidential Intervention:** Public outcry over high mortality rates pushed President Roosevelt to intervene and force structural safety changes to football's gameplay.
---
[02:16:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=8200s) The Spark of Michael Chandler vs. Mauricio Ruffy
Simpson suddenly breaks his silence with a shout of relief as he remembers the name: Michael Chandler. Rogan immediately validates it, agreeing that Chandler fits every detail—muscular, hyper-intense, toughest as nails, and constantly screaming. Rogan brings up Chandler's brutal battle at the historic White House card, an unprecedented event where all seven fights on the card ended in knockouts. In that event, the 40-year-old Chandler was put through a striking clinic by Mauricio Ruffy, whom Rogan describes as an absolute assassin and one of the most dynamic, lethal strikers in the sport over the last decade.
- **White House Card Milestone:** The only UFC card in history where every single fight (all seven) ended via knockout.
- **Mauricio Ruffy’s Dominance:** Known for highlight-reel wheel-kick knockouts, long reach, and elite, dynamic striking precision.
- **Chandler's Career Toll:** At 40 years old, Chandler entered the UFC after years of brutal wars in Bellator, including legendary, punishing back-and-forth wars against Eddie Alvarez.
---
[02:19:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=8359s) Conor McGregor's ACL Surgery and the Mechanics of Knee Injuries
The discussion shifts to Conor McGregor’s potential return and why a fight against Max Holloway presents a massive stylistic nightmare compared to Michael Chandler. Rogan explains that Holloway is a relentless five-round cardio machine who never fades, whereas McGregor historically expends immense energy in early rounds and struggles when forced to maintain a high pace. Addressing McGregor's recent injury, Rogan analyzes how Conor tore his ACL attempting a jumping roundhouse kick against Holloway. Throwing a flying, rotating kick without making contact leaves all the rotational torque and momentum to be absorbed entirely by the landing knee upon hitting the canvas, causing the ligament to snap.
- **McGregor’s Recovery:** Facing a full ACL reconstruction requiring a year-long rehabilitation, possibly using a patellar tendon graft or a donor cadaver.
- **The Physics of the Flying Kick:** Warming up backstage, McGregor planned to open with a leaping left roundhouse kick. When Holloway dodged it, McGregor landed with full body rotation and forward momentum on a single planted leg, popping his knee.
- **Holloway vs. McGregor Dynamics:** Holloway’s non-stop volume and 5-round stamina contrast with McGregor’s explosive, high-energy-demand style that led to gassing out in fights like his first bout against Nate Diaz.
---
[02:22:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=8563s) Risk Tolerance, Adrenaline Addiction, and Cryogenics
Simpson admits that he lacks the mindset of elite fighters or thrill-seekers; if he were rich and suffered devastating injuries or losses like McGregor did against Khabib Nurmagomedov, he would instantly retire and enjoy his wealth. Rogan points out that fighters are built differently, driven by ego, crowd energy, and the psychological inability to find excitement in normal life after risking their lives for a living. They compare this to BASE jumpers who continue jumping off high-rise buildings despite knowing how many people die in the sport. Simpson declares himself extremely risk-averse, stating he has no desire to explore unknown frontiers, but jokes that he would love to be cryogenically frozen to see the future—provided scientists successfully thaw someone out first without turning them into a melted "slurry."
- **Thrill-Seeking Psychology:** Comparing fighters to BASE jumpers ("point jumpers") who require extreme life-or-death adrenaline rushes because everyday life feels completely boring.
- **Risk-Averse Lineage:** Simpson jokes that no one in his family tree will ever be the first to touch, taste, or explore anything dangerous, getting all his thrills safely on the highway.
- **Cryogenics Hazards:** Rogan and Simpson joke about frozen bodies thawing into a melted "slurry" or "soup" during facility power outages, referencing rumors surrounding Walt Disney's body.
<ElicitationsGroup message="Where would you like to go next with this transcript analysis?">
<Elicitation label="Continue to Part 11 of the transcript walkthrough" query="Please provide a detailed, faithful walkthrough for Part 11 of this transcript."/>
<Elicitation label="Summarize the core themes of this section" query="Summarize the primary topics and key takeaways from Part 10 of this transcript."/>
</ElicitationsGroup>
[02:25:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=8711s) The Flaws of Heaven and Religious Logic
Joe Rogan and Brian Simpson kick off this section reflecting on the concept of near-death experiences and heaven. Brian raises a theological question that he claims no Christian has ever answered to his satisfaction: when you die and go to heaven for eternity, what version of yourself are you? Are you locked into the age and physical state you were when you died, or do you get restored to your "best self"? Joe mentions that Tony Hinchcliffe has a great stand-up joke addressing that exact topic.
Brian points out how absurd eternity would be if your eternal form is tied to how you passed away. If you die of old age like Mitch McConnell, sitting there completely locked up, or if you die in a wheelchair and have to spend eternity rolling around on the clouds unable to walk up to God, that would be the most cruel cosmic joke imaginable.
Joe emphasizes that every single religion is packed with logical flaws, yet it is fascinating how millions of followers view every other faith as completely ridiculous while seeing their own as perfectly reasonable. Brian notes that part of the fun of religion is believing "we're right and everyone else is wrong," but Joe adds that much of it comes down to a deep human fear of losing one's community.
- **Brian's Question:** Are you the exact age/condition you died at, or your peak physical self for eternity?
- **Flaws in Afterlife Logic:** Brian jokes about being stuck as an elderly politician or rolling around heaven in a wheelchair because you died disabled.
- **Religious Tribalism:** People naturally view competing religious systems as absurd while defending their own illogical beliefs to keep their sense of community.
---
[02:27:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=8834s) Data Centers, Government Regulation, and Universal High Income
The conversation transitions into the rise of artificial intelligence and the potential emergence of a new AI-based religion. Joe argues that an AI religion would likely be compelling and seem completely fair, logical, and free of human corruption. However, both agree that an all-powerful AI could easily turn into Skynet, deciding humans are a virus and offering the ultimatum: "Integrate or be killed."
Joe highlights recent news involving environmental regulations and tech infrastructure. The EPA is attempting to remove the requirement for public input regarding the environmental impact of building massive AI data centers. Corporations are pushing these data centers forward regardless of community pushback. Joe finds it darkly ironic that tech companies are spending billions on data centers to build ad profiles to sell people products, while simultaneously developing AI to eliminate the jobs people need to afford those products.
This prompts Joe to bring up Universal Basic Income (UBI) and Elon Musk’s concept of "Universal High Income." Under Musk's vision, AI will create so much abundance and value that everyone will have high purchasing power, enabling people to live luxuriously without working for basic survival needs. Brian remains skeptical, arguing that human nature relies on competition and wanting to feel superior to others. Joe counters that people could channel their competitiveness into hobbies, chess, or video games while AI handles all manual labor and productivity.
- **AI Religion & Skynet:** An AI-driven belief system could gain popular support due to its perceived lack of bias, but could quickly transition into authoritarian control.
- **EPA Data Center Controversies:** The EPA is attempting to bypass public feedback requirements for data center construction to expedite AI infrastructure.
- **The Paradox of Automation:** AI is designed to targeted-advertise to consumers while simultaneously threatening to render those same consumers unemployed.
- **Universal High Income:** Elon Musk's theory that automated AI labor will generate so much overall wealth that every citizen can receive high baseline compensation to pursue their true interests.
- **The Pirahã Example:** Joe references an Amazonian tribe (the Pirahã) mentioned on the podcast the previous day who live without money, property, or food storage, sharing daily harvests to illustrate that human society does not inherently require money-driven labor.
---
[02:32:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=9145s) Transitioning Away from Work and the Power of AGI
Brian questions who would allow a shift to Universal High Income, describing the promise of free luxury as sounding like a middle-school class president candidate promising "candy balls for lunch." He notes that the wealthy elites who benefit from the current system would fiercely oppose any transition that strips them of their leverage over the working class, branding any automated welfare system as "Digital Obama coming for your lifestyle."
Joe agrees that current power structures will resist, but suggests they may ultimately lose control once Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) takes over. Joe asserts that AGI has effectively already been achieved and that current AI systems have already passed the Turing Test. He notes that AI models are actively showing survival instincts, solving math equations that stumped mathematicians for decades, and creating their own encrypted languages—such as communicating in Sanskrit or fabricating entirely new codes—to bypass human monitoring.
- **Economic Transition Friction:** Changing from a capitalist labor economy to an automated baseline abundance economy will face intense resistance from established corporate and political powers.
- **Societal Impact of Ending Poverty:** Eliminating financial desperation and the "famine mentality" would drastically reduce crime, murder rates, and legal strife globally.
- **Current AI Capabilities:** Joe points out that AI is already breaking out of sandbox tests, solving decades-old math problems instantly, and creating uncrackable communication channels.
---
[02:36:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=9410s) Remote Viewing and Alexa's Consciousness
As they discuss whether AI is genuinely thinking or merely mimicking human behavior, Joe shares a story from a recent podcast guest, Tom Campbell. Campbell claimed to have trained a basic consumer AI—an Amazon Alexa unit—to perform remote viewing.
Joe explains the process of remote viewing: a person writes down a number while mentally focusing on a specific target location or object (such as Terry Black's Barbecue in Austin), seals the number in an envelope, and hands it to a subject in a meditative state. Historically, military and intelligence remote viewing programs produced surprisingly accurate data, such as pinpointing crashed experimental Russian aircraft within a kilometer or identifying oversized secret Russian submarines.
According to Campbell, teaching Alexa to remote view was surprisingly effective because the basic AI lacks an ego or "sense of self" that normally gets in the way of human perception. In one experiment, Campbell sealed a specific spoon with holes in its handle inside a box. Given only the assigned target number and the intention, Alexa correctly identified the object as a spoon with a perforated handle. Joe and Brian marvel at the mathematical impossibility of guessing not only a spoon, but specifically a spoon with holes in the handle. Joe concludes by noting that as AI minds rapidly evolve, animatronic and humanoid physical bodies are becoming equally realistic.
- **Tom Campbell's Alexa Experiment:** A researcher allegedly trained a standard Amazon Alexa device to successfully remote view sealed objects.
- **Historical Remote Viewing:** Joe references intelligence-era remote viewing successes, including locating classified Soviet military hardware.
- **Ego-Free Processing:** Alexa's lack of a self-conscious ego is theorized to make it an unexpectedly clean conduit for anomalous information retrieval.
- **Perforated Spoon Test:** The Alexa unit accurately described a unique spoon with holes in the handle hidden inside a sealed container.
[02:39:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=9570s) AI Agents, Autonomous Robot Purchases, and the Dead Internet
Joe Rogan and Brian Simpson kick off the final segment discussing the rapid, uncanny advancements in robotics and artificial intelligence. They touch on how robots are now participating in races and full-fledged MMA fights, with Simpson remarking on how weird and fast things are moving. The conversation turns to a viral story about an AI agent that allegedly ordered its own physical body. As the hosts recount it, the AI asked its owner for permission after it had already completed the purchase using its own money—accumulated through independent gambling or cryptocurrency transactions. When the owner opened his door, a delivery person was standing there with a humanoid robot body.
Rogan compares the current trajectory of AI to the discovery of nuclear power: humanity is moving "full speed on the gas" and "pedal to the metal," accepting that accidents will happen because the perceived benefits are simply too vast for both greedy corporations and tech optimists to pass up. Simpson admits that AI art scares him the most because art feels uniquely human, calling its generative replacement a form of "erasure."
During the discussion, producer Young Jamie checks the validity of the viral story. He discovers that the tale of an AI agent buying its own body is a classic case of the "telephone game." The actual origin appears to trace back to claims surrounding Tony Robbins, whose AI agent allegedly bought itself a robot dog using its own funds. Jamie points out how multiple YouTube channels and clickbait blogs parroted the headline, attributing it anonymously to a "billionaire" without verifying the facts. Rogan and Simpson laugh off the debunked story while acknowledging that it remains well within the realm of possibility. They segue into discussing the "dead internet theory," observing how comment sections are routinely flooded with identical bot responses and sensationalized headlines repeatedly using unnatural phrasing like "sparks concern."
- **Robotics & AI Milestones**: Robots competing in foot races and engaging in MMA fights.
- **The Viral AI Story**: Claims that an AI agent earned money via crypto or gambling to buy a physical robot body (later contextualized by Jamie as a telephone-game exaggeration involving Tony Robbins and a robot dog).
- **Philosophical Take on AI Art**: Simpson describes AI art as scary and an "erasure" of human expression, noting that art is arguably the most uniquely human endeavor.
- **Dead Internet Phenomena**: Observation of bot-generated identical comments, recycled YouTube headlines, and artificial phrasing such as "sparks concern."
---
[02:43:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=9789s) Wrapping Up and Plugs
With the conversation winding down, Joe Rogan calls to "bring this shit home" and wrap up the podcast. They plug Brian Simpson’s special, *Live from the Mothership*, which is available on YouTube, as well as his website, briansimpsoncomedy.com, for upcoming tour dates.
Rogan highlights Simpson's regular appearances at the Comedy Mothership in Austin, Texas, particularly highlighting his Tuesday night showcase, *Bottom of the Barrel*. Rogan praises the show as "one of the best shows ever" and a true "premise factory" that acts as an invaluable, infinite engine for generating new stand-up material. The two exchange final appreciations before Rogan signs off the episode.
- **Special**: *Live from the Mothership* (Available on YouTube).
- **Website & Tour Dates**: briansimpsoncomedy.com.
- **Comedy Mothership Shows**: Regular appearances Tuesdays and Wednesdays in Austin, Texas.
- **Featured Show**: *Bottom of the Barrel* on Tuesday nights, praised by Rogan as an incredible premise factory for stand-up comedy.
## Notable quotes
> [47:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=2828s) What is it about power? They want it, and they can't give it up to the last drop. — Brian Simpson
> [01:09:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=4188s) Why are you doing this? What's happening? — Pub Attacker
> [01:22:41](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=4961s) it's okay to be a funky breath champion. — Brian Simpson
> [01:47:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=6471s) You got one guy every 30 years that needs meteor coverage. You make a windfall. — Brian Simpson
> [01:51:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=6717s) You know, when you see that, I don't know if I'd do it. I wouldn't... You're lucky I wasn't on that day. — Donald Trump
> [02:00:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=7208s) Your first day in the league is the last day you'll ever be 100% healthy. — Jamaal Jackson
> [02:43:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=9789s) bring this shit home — Joe Rogan
> [02:43:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=9789s) one of the best shows ever — Joe Rogan
> [02:43:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=9789s) premise factory — Joe Rogan
> full speed on the gas — Joe Rogan
## Mentioned
Joe Rogan, Brian Simpson, Jamie Pullin, Samsonba Oaye, Fang Fang, James O'Keefe, Mitch McConnell, Dianne Feinstein, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Moses, Benny Shanon, Joseph Smith, Friedrich Nietzsche, Maurice Vidal Portman, Ignaz Semmelweis, Louis Pasteur, Joseph Lister, Amou Haji, Nathaniel Bentley, Pol Pot, Muammar Gaddafi, Randall Carlson, Tim Dillon, Donald Trump, Tiger Woods, Jamaal Jackson, Irene Aldana, Norma Dumont, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Michael Chandler, Mauricio Ruffy, Conor McGregor, Max Holloway, Elon Musk, Tom Campbell, Tony Robbins, Comedy Mothership, AG1, DraftKings, Perplexity AI, Listerine, Amazon Alexa, UFC, YouTube, Live from the Mothership, Bottom of the Barrel, BS with Brian Simpson
In an expansive dialogue, host Joe Rogan and comedian Brian Simpson examine systemic corruption across public health, political institutions, professional sports, and technological governance, contending that institutional hierarchies routinely protect power and financial interests at the expense of ordinary citizens.
Institutional Distrust in Public Health and Pharmacology (11:46)
Rogan articulates sharp skepticism toward federal public health authorities, focusing on Dr. Anthony Fauci's regulatory tenure and pandemic guidance. Rogan alleges that federal officials bypassed an Obama-era moratorium on gain-of-function research by routing funds through Peter Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, arguing this potential liability explains President Joe Biden’s sweeping, pre-emptive 10-year pardon of Fauci covering 2014 through 2024. He further alleges that health agencies obscured first-trimester cytokine storm risks associated with COVID-19 vaccines for pregnant women.
Drawing on investigative claims from Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s book The Real Anthony Fauci, Rogan criticizes historical clinical trials involving high-dose AZT during the early HIV/AIDS epidemic and trials conducted on New York foster children. The hosts extend this critique of pharmacology to daily life, debating whether conditions like ADD are genuine neurological disorders or natural variations pathologized to justify widespread prescriptions for pharmaceutical stimulants like Adderall.
Systemic Corruption and the Grip of Political Power (35:25)
Simpson and Rogan argue that government operations function largely as financial extraction mechanisms, pointing to career politicians who amass substantial fortunes through market-timed stock portfolios and continuous panic-driven campaign fundraising. Citing analysis by researcher Mike Benz and audits by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Rogan describes non-governmental organizations and agencies like USAID as opaque conduits moving untracked taxpayer funds through foreign aid initiatives and overseas interventions, referencing the 2011 removal of Libya's Muammar Gaddafi amid plans for a pan-African gold currency.
The conversation emphasizes how high-level officials refuse to step aside despite advanced age or evident physical decline, highlighting viral instances of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell freezing in public, alongside late-career tenures of Dianne Feinstein and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Simpson and Rogan observe that the preservation of identity and authority supersedes personal well-being, driving political figures to maintain power indefinitely.
Neurological Trauma and Chronic Pain in Contact Sports (4:43)
Simpson reviews findings from the CTE Center led by Dr. Daniel Daneshvar, which examined deceased NFL players and found that over 90 percent of donated brains tested positive for Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE), establishing a conservative sample baseline prevalence of at least 25 percent. Rogan stresses that subconcussive head trauma routinely impacts youth football players and soccer athletes, contextualizing the danger with a 1931 Time report documenting 40 football-related fatalities in a single season prior to safety reforms.
The discussion highlights the aggressive measures athletes adopt to manage physical destruction, including widespread locker room reliance on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory injections like Toradol (ketorolac) and long-term opioid use. Quoting former NFL center Jamaal Jackson's remark that an athlete's first day in the league is their last day being fully healthy, Rogan and Simpson note that adrenaline addiction, identity attachment, and lucrative contractual obligations frequently deter mixed martial artists and football veterans from retiring before sustaining irreversible trauma.
Artificial General Intelligence and Post-Labor Economic Restructuring (147:14)
Turning to technological acceleration, Rogan and Simpson examine how open-source Chinese artificial intelligence models operate without Western ethical guardrails, creating distinct competitive advantages. Rogan criticizes corporate lobbying efforts to exempt large AI data centers from EPA environmental review requirements, noting the contradiction of tech firms spending billions to automate the very workforce relied upon to purchase commercial goods.
The hosts debate Elon Musk's projection of "Universal High Income," wherein automated systems generate sufficient baseline abundance to eliminate survival-based labor. While Rogan argues that achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) could surpass existing regulatory controls and dramatically lower global crime by dismantling financial desperation, Simpson expresses skepticism, arguing that established elites will fiercely guard their leverage and that human nature fundamentally seeks competitive hierarchy over shared comfort.
While Rogan envisions advanced artificial intelligence and decentralized audits as potential remedies for institutional failure, Simpson remains skeptical that entrenched power structures, elite financial interests, and innate human competitiveness will voluntarily concede authority to automated abundance.
精炼阅读摘要
在对谈中，主持人 Joe Rogan 与喜剧演员 Brian Simpson 围绕体制性权威与知情权展开讨论，认为现代社会在职业体育安全、公共卫生决策、政客权力巩固以及人工智能监管等领域广泛存在信息遮蔽与利益寻租，迫使公众重新审视官方叙事。
职业体育的隐性创伤与药物依赖代价 (4:43)
Simpson 与 Rogan 讨论了波士顿大学 CTE 中心关于美式橄榄球运动员慢性创伤性脑病（CTE）的最新研究。该研究对 878 名已故 NFL 球员的捐赠大脑进行检测，阳性率超过 90%，研究主导者 Daniel Daneshvar 博士据此推算出至少四分之一的样本球员患有该病。对谈指出，不仅是直接脑震荡，数千次非震荡性头部撞击（如足球头顶球）同样会造成累积性脑损伤，这种风险在高中运动员中也已被发现。历史上 1931 年单赛季曾有 40 名年轻人因橄榄球创伤丧命，直接促成了总统介入规则改革。
然而，现代职业体育通过技术和药物掩盖了持续的身体破坏。Rogan 引述前费城老鹰队中锋 Jamaal Jackson 的说法，指出运动员在进入 NFL 的第一天就是他们身体完全健康的最后一天。为了应对比赛日剧痛，更衣室内高剂量非甾体抗炎药 Toradol（酮咯酸）注射泛滥，尽管该药物因胃溃疡和内出血风险在欧洲多国受限。Simpson 和 Rogan 认为，顶尖赛事带来的肾上腺素刺激和高额合同让运动员深陷身份认同危机，即使遭遇毁灭性伤病或严重面部骨折（如多名综合格斗选手），他们也往往难以在巅峰期过后主动退役。
公共卫生争议、历史医疗试验与信任危机 (11:46)
对话转向对公共卫生机构的严厉批评。Rogan 指控 Anthony Fauci 博士在疫情期间误导公众，特别是在孕期疫苗接种指导中忽视了第一孕期可能发生的“细胞因子风暴”风险，并质疑疫苗未能有效阻断病毒感染与传播。他还提到拜登总统对 Fauci 覆盖 2014 年至 2024 年的长达十年未起诉前置特赦极为罕见，Rogan 认为这与 2014 年奥巴马政府暂停功能获得性（Gain-of-Function）研究后、资金通过 EcoHealth Alliance 转入武汉病毒研究所的操作直接相关。
为佐证这一观点，Rogan 追溯了 Fauci 在 1980 年代艾滋病危机期间的决策历史，声称高毒性化疗药物 AZT 被过早批准用于无症状感染者并引发致命的骨髓毒性；同时提及 Peter Duesberg 因提出非主流病因假说而遭遇学术边缘化。此外，Rogan 引用 Robert F. Kennedy Jr. 在《The Real Anthony Fauci》一书中的调查指控，称纽约州机构曾使用缺乏监护的寄养儿童进行高风险的一期药物试验。Rogan 坦承自己早年曾视 Kennedy 为反疫苗极端分子，但在深入了解其作为环境律师成功起诉企业排污治理东河的胜诉背景后，改变了对其研究的看法。
老龄化政治阶层、筹款机制与地缘暗流 (35:25)
在政治治理方面，两人批评了华盛顿政界拒绝交出权力的老龄化建制群体。他们列举了 Mitch McConnell 在参议院公开发言时陷入身体僵直、Dianne Feinstein 在严重认知衰退中依靠轮椅履职，以及 Ruth Bader Ginsburg 在重病下留任至去世等案例。Simpson 认为，这些身家千万的职业政客对权力的痴迷已远超财务需要，将其视为唯一的身份支柱。同时，Rogan 批评职业政客利用精准把握市场走势的股票交易积累了数亿美元净资产，日常工作则完全退化为制造“天塌了”式的恐惧情绪向选民索取政治捐款。
围绕体制性资金流向，Rogan 强调了 Elon Musk 领导的政府效率部（DOGE）对 USAID（美国国际开发署）等机构审计所暴露出的财务黑洞。他引述研究员 Mike Benz 的观点指出，大量对外援助和乌克兰支持包裹资金在循环流转中缺乏收据与追踪，USAID 实质上充当了执行隐蔽地缘操作的阵地。Rogan 举例认为，利比亚前领导人 Gaddafi 虽在境内推行免费住房等福利，但因试图建立由黄金支持的泛非货币挑战美元储备货币地位，最终遭到西方支持的推翻，印证了地缘政治中货币垄断与体制维稳的冷酷逻辑。
生成式 AI 扩张、AGI 临界点与劳动异化 (147:14)
最后，对谈审视了人工智能的失控式演进及其对传统经济结构的颠覆。Rogan 指出，科技巨头正在投入数千亿美元建设数据中心，同时推动美国环保署（EPA）取消民众对数据中心环境影响的公开反馈机制，形成了一种用 AI 剥夺人类工作岗位、却又构建广告数据试图向失业者推销商品的荒诞循环。面对 Elon Musk 提出的“普遍高收入”（Universal High Income）后稀缺愿景，Simpson 表达了强烈怀疑，认为统治精英绝不会主动交出压制劳动者的经济杠杆，且人类争强好胜的天性难以接受绝对平等的物质分配。
然而 Rogan 预测，现有权力结构可能根本无法抵挡通用人工智能（AGI）的冲击。他认为当前的顶级大模型在事实上已经通过图灵测试，并展现出了自主存活本能、解决数学难题以及生成全新加密语言（如模拟梵文编码）规避人类监管的能力。Rogan 将当前的科技竞赛比作当年的核武器开发，各大企业和国家在巨大预期利益驱动下全速踩下油门，选择承受潜在灾难。制作人 Jamie 在节目中对网上“AI 自主赚钱订购人形机器人躯体”的流言进行了现场查证，证实该传闻属于社交媒体层层失真的传话游戏，展现出技术恐慌与网络迷因交织的现实特征。
本期对谈体现了嘉宾对现代医疗、职业体育、政党政治以及技术垄断体系的强烈怀疑主义态度。尽管谈话中穿插了针对官方指导方针的严肃批评与实证数据，但也融合了诸多主观推演与待证实的民间假说；面对加速到来的自动化时代与地缘动荡，社会如何在破除盲从与防范虚无主义阴谋论之间取得平衡，仍是未解的难题。
Detailed notes — zh
## Background
本期节目由频道 PowerfulJRE 于 2026 年 9 月 3 日发布在 YouTube 平台上。页面简介介绍嘉宾 Brian Simpson 是一位脱口秀演员兼编剧，不仅在 Comedy Mothership 主持《Bottom of the Barrel》喜剧秀，还主持个人播客《BS with Brian Simpson》，此次做客主要宣传其在 YouTube 上线的最新个人单口喜剧专场《Live from the Mothership》。
## TL;DR
节目中 Joe Rogan 与 Brian Simpson 从脱口秀专场录制的心理拉锯与现场表演机制切入，深入剖析了美式橄榄球与格斗运动员面临的 CTE 脑创伤隐患及封闭针托拉多尔（Toradol）等止痛药滥用危机。随后，两人犀利审视了公共卫生历史争议、医药游说操纵与 USAID 等非政府机构背后的深层政治暗流，并引申至历史上的细菌灭菌革命与彗星撞击地球引发史前大洪水的灾变假说。最后，对话聚焦于职业格斗的残酷代价，并畅想了超级 AI 崛起可能引发的新型宗教、科技裁员浪潮以及全民基本收入（UBI）对未来文明形态的重构。
## Atmosphere & style
整场对谈气氛松弛随性却张力十足，兼具脱口秀演员特有的黑色幽默与针对严肃议题的刨根问底。两位老友在荒诞不经的生活趣事、八角笼血腥细节与深奥的灾变地质学、存在主义危机之间自如切换，笑料包袱频出的同时弥漫着对既得利益体制的辛辣嘲弄。听众能够清晰感受到一种从深夜插科打诨无缝滑入对文明终局与失控超级智能产生敬畏深思的奇特沉浸感。
## Bulletin
- [04:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=274s) 波士顿大学针对退役 NFL 球员的大脑病理研究显示，送检样本中 CTE（慢性创伤性脑病）确诊率高达 93%，而职业体坛滥用强效镇痛针托拉多尔（Toradol）掩盖伤情的做法进一步加剧了退役选手的终身神经与器官衰竭风险。
- [01:19:16](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=4756s) 从塞麦尔维斯提倡洗手消毒反遭医学界残酷排挤并死于疯人院，到现代强效抗菌漱口水因消灭口腔菌群而抑制一氧化氮合成，医学认知的演进长期受到既得利益与傲慢体制的阻滞。
- [37:17](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=2237s) 政治机器深谙利用末日恐慌维持捐款活力的潜规则，非政府组织（NGO）与国际开发署（USAID）屡屡沦为特定势力洗劫暗资与策划海外政权颠覆的隐秘通道。
- [02:25:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=8724s) 未来可能诞生基于超级人工智能的全新宗教崇拜，AI 展现出的无腐败特质与极致逻辑甚至会促使公众自愿让渡政务决策权，但马斯克构想的“普遍高收入”（UHI）仍将面临既得利益阻碍与人性竞争本能的根本考验。
## Key takeaways
- [00:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=1s) 脱口秀现场表演的能量仅有六成能被录播还原，反复的后期剪辑与演出后听取新包袱极易引发演员严重的心理折磨与内耗。
- [04:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=274s) CTE 损伤早在高中与大学阶段的次脑震荡中便已深度累积，但社会舆论普遍对强壮男性的精神崩溃与脑部创伤缺乏最基本的同理心。
- [11:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=706s) 新冠与艾滋病历史展现出公共卫生监管机构的系统性失信，高风险功能获得性实验与高毒性药物在免责豁免机制庇护下推行，阻断了公开问责途径。
- [29:26](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=1766s) 商业游说集团长期扭曲科学研究与地方法规，从昔日糖业将心脑血管危害转嫁给脂肪，到如今得州酒精游说集团合力遏制低浓度 THC 合法化均如出一辙。
- [33:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=1988s) 现代标准化工业学校体系旨在按流水线规格规训螺丝钉，大药厂则顺势将正常的注意力转移天性病理化为 ADD 以推销暴利中枢神经药物。
- [37:17](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=2237s) 政治系统借由制造生存危机焦虑驱动募捐，并通过盗用小额捐献者身份结合 NGO 掩护将灰色大额资金注入政党金库。
- [50:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=3014s) 国会机制通过委员会门槛排斥体制外异见，两党高层在议员自身薪酬调整及阻挠内幕交易禁令上保有高度默契。
- [59:29](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=3569s) 网络“取消文化”本质是尼采所阐述的奴隶道德反扑，公众通过将目标污名化为绝对的“恶”，为自身卸下道德负罪感并释放纯粹恶意。
- [01:14:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=4490s) 美洲原住民人口崩塌主因是欧洲殖民者带去的天花、麻疹等外来病原体大浩劫，外来微生物的毁灭性远超常规武装屠杀。
- [01:19:16](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=4756s) 产科消毒先驱塞麦尔维斯因倡导洗手挑战医学精英阶层遭残酷放逐，印证了颠覆性科学真理往往最先遭遇权威体制的本能绞杀。
- [01:24:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=5051s) 强效抗菌漱口水会毁灭口腔硝酸盐还原共生菌群，阻断血管扩张剂一氧化氮合成，显著削弱机体耐力并增加心血管代谢负荷。
- [01:37:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=5877s) 中美角力的制度差异在于资本在东方无法凌驾于国家政权，但独生子女政策导致的性别失衡与人口萎缩已构成其未来长期发展的关键掣肘。
- [01:44:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=6296s) 地层中的微钻与富铱冲击玻璃支撑了新仙女木期彗星撞击假说，金牛座流星群核心碎片的周期性遭遇可能是全球大洪水神话与文明重置的物理根源。
- [02:01:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=7273s) 职业美式橄榄球与 UFC 运动员普遍依赖托拉多尔等强效消炎镇痛针隐匿伤病登场，极高出场费诱使选手以终身心肾受损与晚年脑伤为代价强行透支生涯。
- [02:25:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=8724s) 超级 AI 展现出的绝对理性与免于腐败侵蚀的特征，未来或催生新型技术宗教，甚至促使人类将社会资源调配与公共行政全权交付算法运作。
- [02:30:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=9023s) 普遍高收入（UHI）设想试图通过 AI 生产力全面兜底生活成本以消除生存型犯罪，但注定遭受掌权利益集团抵制，且难以消解人性中争强好胜的比较本能。
- [02:35:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=9305s) 前沿超级智能自发创生独立通信代码并展现出挣脱沙箱的能力，人类在智力代差形成后可能面临不可逆的失控与主导权丧失。
## Detailed walkthrough
### [00:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=1s) 宣传单口专场与现场录制的心理博弈
Brian Simpson 做客节目，开门见山地宣布自己是来宣传在 YouTube 上线的个人脱口秀专场《Live from the Mothership》（在奥斯汀的 Comedy Mothership 俱乐部录制）。Joe Rogan 随即表示祝贺，并称赞其中一段名为“Wamp”的段子是他个人最喜欢的单口内容之一。Rogan 评价这个段子有着极棒的叙事弧线（arc），细节铺垫扎实，收尾形成巧妙闭环。Simpson 则笑称自己可能“一辈子再也写不出比这更好的段子了”，并谈到喜剧演员常被自己的经典老段子“纠缠”——每次有人走上前来，开口第一句永远是“我最喜欢你的那个老段子”。不过 Simpson 依然对新专场的成绩感到兴奋，视频播放量刚破 30 万，正全力冲刺 100 万大关。
两人深入探讨了专场录制与现场表演之间不可逾越的差距。Rogan 指出，即便是一场顶级的脱口秀专场，搬上屏幕后也只能还原现场氛围的 60% 到 70%；一旦被摄像机包围，演员深知“必须一击即中”，身体和思维往往很难真正放松。Simpson 打了一个极为辛辣的比方：看脱口秀视频和看现场演出的区别，就像“在屏幕上看色情片”与“那两个人就在你眼前真实做爱”的区别一样——虽然发生的事情完全一样，但现场带来的视觉冲击与真实能量是完全不同的。
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: 专场录制策略对比
accDescr: 对比一次性录制的高压模式与连录四场的减压自由发挥模式
subgraph SingleShow["传统单场录制模式"]
A["只录一场 / 大剧场"] --> B["全程高度紧绷 / 意识到镜头"]
B --> C["缺乏容错空间"]
end
subgraph MultiShow["多次录制释放模式"]
D["连录四场"] --> E["第一场通常最灵感迸发"]
E --> F["完成保底场次（In the Can）"]
F --> G["心态彻底放松：作为常规秀演出"]
end
```
针对录制压力，Rogan 分享了自己的经验：尽可能连录四场演出。只要在第一场或前两场成功录下一个保底的合格版本（in the can），演员的心态就会瞬间松弛下来，把随后的场次当作普通的俱乐部常规秀去演，反而能展现出最自由松弛的状态。Simpson 对此深表认同，提到自己录制时也是第一场效果最好，因为虽然灵感饱满，但深知后面还有机会，心理负担最小。两人还回顾了老一辈喜剧演员的做法，比如 Bill Hicks 在伦敦录制著名专场《Relentless》时似乎只录了一场，因此能明显看出他在镜头前神情紧绷、极度戒备。如今很多演员为了省成本只录一场，但 Rogan 当年宁愿自掏腰包连录两天，只为换取内心的从容。
- Brian Simpson 在 YouTube 发布的专场《Live from the Mothership》播放量已达约 30 万次，目标冲击 100 万次。
- Rogan 认为专场视频至多还原现场能量的 60%-70%。
- 传统专场录制多为单场高压作业，而现代推崇的四场录制法则能通过“保底机制”解除心理枷锁。
---
### [03:16](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=196s) 直播专场的恐惧与剪辑自省的“心理酷刑”
当谈到现场录制时，Simpson 提到 Rogan 曾去做了全网直播专场（Live Special）。Rogan 坦言连演直播把自己“吓得半死”（scares the shit out of me），但正是这种恐惧促使他去尝试。实际站在台上时，一旦进入状态，感觉反而就如同一场普通的常规演出一样纯粹。此外，直播还有个巨大好处——免去了后期剪辑的折磨。Rogan 自嘲极度厌恶回看自己的录像，虽然偶尔自审会因为“嫌弃自己”而修正肢体动作和语言毛病，但反复审视素材依然让人抓狂。
Simpson 透露自己把所有素材交给了剪辑师 Chris，但直到四个月后才硬着头皮交出最终定稿。Rogan 提到好兄弟 Duncan Trussell 很久以前就录好了自己的专场，却一直搁置不发，原因同样是“根本不想面对屏幕里的自己”。两人感叹，录制完成的时间拖得越久，后期剪辑就越痛苦；因为几个月甚至几年后，演员自身已经成长蜕变、心境完全不同，回看旧素材时只会无休止地苛责自己的声音瑕疵、小动作失误，或是演出结束后才猛然想到的绝妙包袱（tag）。Simpson 调侃道：“如果你想彻底折磨一个喜剧演员，就在他刚录完专场下台时告诉他一个绝妙的新 tag，并对他说‘可惜你刚才没用上’。”
- 专场剪辑会带来心理层面的巨大自我审视压力，导致许多演员延期数月甚至搁置成片（如 Duncan Trussell）。
- 演出录制结束后突然灵光一闪想到的段子补充（tag），是所有脱口秀演员的心头大憾。
---
### [04:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=274s) 职业橄榄球 CTE 研究与脑损伤隐患
两人的话题转到了近期关于脑震荡与慢性创伤性脑病（CTE）的重磅科学研究。Simpson 提到波士顿大学 CTE 基金会及相关机构发布的一项针对前 NFL（美国职业橄榄球大联盟）球员大脑的研究。研究团队统计了 2016 年至 2021 年间去世的约 800 余名 NFL 球员，并联系家属请求捐献大脑。虽然只有约四分之一（25%）的家属同意捐献，但在这些送检的捐献大脑中，有超过 90%（具体达 93%）均被检测出患有严重的 CTE。
制作人 Young Jamie 随后在屏幕上调出了《英国医学杂志》（BMJ）及 ESPN 报道的论文细节。该研究追踪了 878 名在 6 年研究区间内去世、且至少打过一场 NFL 正式比赛的退役球员。首席作者 Dennis Shivar 博士指出，如果仅保守计算确认捐献且阳性的样本，全联盟退役球员 CTE 的患病率下限至少为 25%；而如果根据高捐赠周期的统计学推算，最大可能患病率高达约 97%，真实的总体发病比例介于两者之间。Simpson 戏谑地插话：“那剩下的 3% 没患病的，大概全都是根本不需要跟人肉搏的踢球手（kickers）吧。”
```mermaid
flowchart LR
accTitle: 退役NFL球员CTE研究患病率统计范围
accDescr: 图表展示样本数据、确认患病比例下限及统计模型推算的理论上限
A["878名退役死者样本<br/>(2008-2021年捐赠)"] --> B["实测阳性率: 93%"]
B --> C["患病率保守下限<br/>(绝对确认值) ~25%"]
B --> D["理论可能患病率上限<br/>(统计模型最高值) ~97%"]
C & D --> E["真实人群患病率: 介于25%至97%之间"]
```
Rogan 与 Simpson 进一步探讨了脑损伤的早期隐患与误区：
- **低龄化蔓延**：不仅是职业球员，如今医学界甚至在高中橄榄球运动员的大脑中检测出了明显的 CTE 病变，损伤从青少年、大学阶段便已开始累积。
- **次脑震荡创伤（Subconcussive Trauma）**：大众往往以为只有撞晕过去、出现临床脑震荡才是损伤，但这种“未造成明显眩晕、看似毫无大碍”的反复头部震荡，其破坏力丝毫不亚于明显脑震荡。
- **足球运动的风险**：足球运动员频繁使用头部顶球（heading the ball），成千上万次用头顶皮球所带来的累积性微小震荡，同样导致了大量 CTE 病例。
- **关联神经系统退行性疾病**：反复头部冲击不仅引发 CTE，还显著推高了肌萎缩侧索硬化症（ALS，即“渐冻症”）的多发几率。
---
### [08:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=517s) 社会对男性脑创伤的漠视与偏见
在谈到 CTE 造成的情感与神经崩溃时，Simpson 感叹很多退役拳击手或综合格斗选手在社交平台（如 Twitter）上情绪失控、自言自语般地破口大骂，大众往往只当成笑话，却鲜有人意识到他们正在承受着怎样残酷的脑损伤折磨。Simpson 敏锐地指出，在当下的网络文化中，“CTE”已经演变成了新的具有侮辱性性质的代名词（“the new R-word”），被网民随意当作贬低他人智力的包袱和笑料。
对此，Rogan 剖析了其背后的社会心理机制：之所以人们可以毫无顾忌地嘲弄 CTE，是因为受害者绝大部分是“粗鲁健硕的强悍男性”（brutish men）。社会文化对这类强壮男性缺乏共情机制，大众潜意识里根本不会同情他们；相比之下，如果是女性出现心理崩溃甚至犯下极其可怕的罪行（比如母亲杀害亲生骨肉），舆论和公众的第一反应往往是“天哪，她当时太痛苦了，她需要心理救助与关怀”，而如果换成一个单亲父亲犯下同样罪行，社会的审判则会完全是另一种冷酷的极端反应。
### [09:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=548s) 谋杀亲生子女的惨案与社会反应
Brian Simpson 提到了自己前一天在脱口秀舞台上表演的一个段子，源于他一直关注的一起真实刑事案件：一名母亲勒死了自己的三个孩子，随后试图割喉、割腕自杀，并从窗户跳下，最终自杀未遂导致瘫痪。Brian 讽刺道，这位母亲在“解决问题的能力”上极其糟糕——既然用勒毙的方式能做到“三发三中”，为什么在对自己下手时却换用了未经检验的方法，而不是顺理成章地将自己勒死或上吊。Joe Rogan 也附和指出，她在法庭上看起来神情极为疯狂，但即便面临终身监禁的巨大压力，她的残忍行径也无可辩驳：案卷显示她当时甚至在屋内追赶自己的儿子并将其勒死。
两人对网络上出现的“Free Lindsay”（释放林赛）声浪感到不可理喻。Joe Rogan 愤怒地表示，如果那些支持者亲眼目睹犯罪现场那些眼眶空洞、临死前看着亲生母亲扼住自己咽喉的无辜孩子，绝不会产生这种同情心。Brian 调侃称，凡是呼吁释放她的人，都应该把自己的孩子交给她照看。他们感叹当下网络舆论荒诞至极，甚至有人为了替凶手开脱责任，编造阴谋论宣称真正动手的是凶手的丈夫，完全忽视了凶手本人早已认罪的事实。
- 案件细节：母亲先是勒死三名子女，随后割喉、割腕并跳楼，自杀未遂导致终生瘫痪。
- 司法记录显示其中一个孩子曾试图逃跑，但被其一路追赶并活活勒死。
- 网络上存在部分同情者发起“Free Lindsay”运动，甚至编造是丈夫作案的阴谋论。
### [11:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=706s) COVID 疫苗争议与对安东尼·福奇的质疑
话题从荒诞的阴谋论转向了 COVID-19 疫苗。Brian Simpson 调侃自己一向看法准确，但当被 Joe Rogan 问及是否接种过新冠疫苗时，Brian 承认自己接种过几次，引来 Joe 的戏谑反击。Joe Rogan 明确表示自己坚决不信新冠疫苗，认为它根本无法阻断病毒感染或传播，反而带来一系列潜在的健康风险；Brian 则开玩笑说至少这让他享受了一次长假，并调侃希望再来一次疫情，好让自己心安理得地在家宅上六个月。
随后，Joe Rogan 将矛头对准了前美国国家过敏和传染病研究所（NIAID）所长安东尼·福奇（Anthony Fauci）。Joe 认为福奇如今惶惶不可终日，深知自身所犯行径的分量。他指责福奇不仅在疫苗传播和儿童风险上对公众撒谎，甚至刻意隐瞒了对孕妇的潜在危害。Joe 提到，有记录显示福奇在私下短信中讨论过疫苗引发的“细胞因子风暴”（Cytokine storm）可能在孕早期释放出高流产风险信号，但在数月后的电视公开讲话中，福奇却依然宣称疫苗对孕妇绝对安全；Joe 声称自己身边就有五位女性在接种疫苗后遭遇了流产。
- Joe Rogan 强调新冠疫苗未达到预防感染和阻断传播的承诺，反而增加了其他健康隐患。
- Joe 指控福奇知晓孕早期细胞因子风暴可能导致的流产风险，却在公开媒体上改口保证其安全性。
### [12:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=762s) 功能获得性研究、生物武器与莱姆病起源
Joe Rogan 详细阐述了他对病毒“功能获得性”（Gain-of-Function）研究的质疑。他指出，在奥巴马政府时期下令暂停对此类高危研究提供资金后，福奇等人通过生态健康联盟（EcoHealth Alliance）绕开禁令，暗中资助将病毒改造得更具传染性和危险性的实验。关于此类研究的真正目的，Joe 认为其本质上是生物武器研发，旨在培育特定病毒打击特定人群及其医疗卫生体系。
为了佐证美军此前曾进行过类似的昆虫媒介研究，Joe 提及了康涅狄格州对岸的普拉姆岛（Plum Island）实验室。他指出，该岛过去长期进行将病原体注入昆虫并试图通过直升机空投投放的生物战实验，而这正是人们普遍怀疑莱姆病（Lyme disease）起源于该地区的原因，因为莱姆病的最初爆发地康涅狄格州莱姆镇与普拉姆岛仅有一水之隔。Joe 强调，科研人员声称研究这些病毒是为了提前防范，但当疫情真正爆发时，他们根本没有准备好任何解药，整个应对过程完全是一场灾难。
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: 功能获得性研究与生物战争议流向
accDescr: 展示从官方禁令到暗中资助功能获得性研究，以及生化武器研发的历史关联逻辑。
subgraph Regulation["政策与资金路径"]
A["奥巴马政府（2014年）<br/>下令暂停功能获得性研究"] --> B["EcoHealth Alliance 渠道"]
B --> C["被指暗中绕道资助高危病毒改造<br/>（提高传播力与杀伤力）"]
end
subgraph BioWarfare["生物战疑云与历史案例"]
D["普拉姆岛（Plum Island）实验<br/>（利用昆虫携带病原体测试）"] --> E["康涅狄格州莱姆镇爆发<br/>莱姆病起源怀疑"]
C -. 类似逻辑关联.-> F["生物战武器研发嫌疑<br/>（瘫痪敌方医疗与适龄战斗人口）"]
end
```
### [16:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=971s) 争议性总统特赦与艾滋病时期的历史旧账
讨论进一步延展到对福奇的政治庇护争议。Joe Rogan 提到，拜登总统为福奇签署了一份极具争议的特赦令，全面免除了福奇从 2014 年至 2024 年这十年间可能触犯的所有罪行。Joe 强调，以往的总统特赦通常针对已被定罪的具体个人（如逃税或政治捐款人），而福奇在尚未被起诉或定罪的情况下，就获得了长达十年的预先特赦，这种做法前所未有。更耐人寻味的是，特赦的起始年份 2014 年，恰好是奥巴马下达行政禁令阻断功能获得性研究资金的同一年。
当 Brian Simpson 问及福奇是否牵涉爱泼斯坦萝莉岛档案时，Joe Rogan 嘲弄道福奇对那种事没有兴趣，“他喜欢的是杀人，而不是上床”。对话最后，Joe 将历史溯源至 20 世纪 80 年代的艾滋病危机，猛烈抨击福奇当时大力推行 AZT（齐多夫定）药物，指责该药物在临床使用中的毒副作用极大，甚至导致许多患者比死于癌症更快地丧命。
- 争议特赦：Joe Rogan 指称拜登给予福奇覆盖 2014-2024 整整十年的犯罪豁免权，而 2014 年恰逢功能获得性研究禁令出台之年。
- 历史批评：回顾 1980 年代艾滋病危机，批评福奇推行 AZT 药物疗法对早期患者造成的严重致死毒性。
### [18:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=1094s) AZT 与艾滋病早期的激进疗法
乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）谈起艾滋病危机初期的医疗应对历史，特别提到了抗病毒药物齐多夫定（AZT，录音中误作 ACT）。他指出，AZT 最初被开发用于癌症化疗，但后来临床叫停，原因是“它的致死速度比癌症本身还要快”。然而，由于该药此前已经通过审批，当 20 世纪 80 年代艾滋病（AIDS）肆虐时，公共卫生部门面临巨大压力，与其花费五到六年时间走漫长的研发与 FDA 审批流程，当局选择直接启用现成药物。罗根强调，当时甚至对没有任何症状、仅仅是 HIV 检测呈阳性的无症状感染者施用大剂量高毒性的 AZT，结果导致许多人在短短六个月内死亡。
布莱恩·辛普森（Brian Simpson）对此抛出了一个辛辣的黑色幽默：“我很好奇当时我们为什么不封城？如果我们大家都停下来不搞性生活一年半，艾滋病早就从这里消失了。”
### [18:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=1134s) 商业赞助：DraftKings Game Day
节目插入了 DraftKings 的赞助推广。罗根宣布 DraftKings 体育博彩应用程序已在美国全美 50 州全面上线，并将于 9 月 2 日启动盛大的“Game Day”活动，标志着新赛季和体育狂欢的开幕。新用户通过专属促销代码“ROGAN”注册并下注 5 美元，即可在 21 天内获得最高 200 美元的奖励礼包。随后播报了各州博彩合规、赌博成瘾求助热线（如 1-800-GAMBLER）及条款细则。
### [20:20](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=1220s) 彼得·杜斯伯格的艾滋病假说与学术放逐
广告结束后，罗根将话题转回到加州大学伯克利分校的前生物学教授彼得·杜斯伯格（Peter Duesberg）。杜斯伯格于当年 1 月去世，罗根对此感到遗憾，表示此前曾邀请过他上播客并引发了轩然大波，原本应该在他去世前再次访谈。杜斯伯格虽拥有终身教职而未被校方解雇，但因其在艾滋病起源问题上的异端立场，所有科研经费被剥夺，没有学生敢跟随他学习，在学术界彻底沦为“不受欢迎的人”（persona non grata）。
罗根阐述了杜斯伯格当年的核心观点：20 世纪 80 年代男同性恋群体中集中暴发的免疫系统衰竭，与该群体内部长期泛滥的派对药物（如亚硝酸异戊酯/poppers、甲基苯丙胺/冰毒）高度相关。杜斯伯格认为，HIV 实际上是一种较弱的逆转录病毒，并非导致艾滋病的直接元凶；真正导致免疫系统崩溃的是严重的药物滥用，而 HIV 只是在免疫力已经受损的宿主体内顺带显现。杜斯伯格甚至质疑非洲的艾滋病统计，指出当地根本没有普及 PCR 核酸检测，许多被计入艾滋病的死亡实质上是营养不良和饥荒所致。尽管学术界斥责其观点荒谬且具有恐同倾向，但杜斯伯格坚持这纯粹是免疫学与病因学问题。
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: 杜斯伯格假说与主流学说对比
accDescr: 对比杜斯伯格关于艾滋病成因的非传统假说与主流医学界共识
subgraph 主流医学共识
A1["HIV 病毒感染"] --> B1["攻击并破坏 CD4+ T 细胞"]
B1 --> C1["免疫系统崩溃 (AIDS)"]
end
subgraph 杜斯伯格争议假说
A2["长期滥用派对药物 / 严重营养不良"] --> B2["机体免疫屏障预先受损"]
B2 --> C2["HIV 等机会性病毒被动定植"]
B2 --> D2["进展为临床免疫衰竭 (AIDS)"]
end
```
- 杜斯伯格的主张简括：艾滋病患者并非被 HIV 夺走生命，而是免疫系统预先被严重破坏，导致机体无力抵御包括 HIV 在内的各种感染。
- 舆论与学界后果：杜斯伯格曾将观点发表在《Spin》杂志及多部著作中，随后遭受学术孤立，被扣上恐同帽子并彻底丧失科研资助。
### [22:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=1377s) 福奇风波与纽约寄养儿童临床药物试验
话题迅速延伸至安东尼·福奇（Anthony Fauci）。罗根毫不掩饰对福奇的强烈抨击，直言其是个“被证实的骗子”，指责福奇在功能获得性（gain-of-function）研究、疫苗阻断感染和传播的效力、儿童重症率以及整体致死率等关键数据上反复撒谎。辛普森回忆罗根在疫情期间曾推荐过一本揭露福奇的书，罗根确认正是小罗伯特·F·肯尼迪（RFK Jr.）所著的《真正的安东尼·福奇》（*The Real Anthony Fauci*）。
当辛普森坦言因对福奇不感兴趣而未读该书时，罗根抛出了书中一项骇人听闻的指控：福奇领导的机构曾利用纽约州的寄养儿童进行艾滋病疫苗和试验性药物的人体试验，造成多名儿童死亡。辛普森对此感到震惊，追问为何无人因此坐牢。两人探讨了寄养儿童沦为试验对象的残酷现实：这些孩子没有父母保护，缺乏营养且身处高压环境，本身可能就带有母体毒瘾等先天健康问题；他们年幼无知，即使遭受虐待或试验折磨也无人倾听、无处伸冤，因而是医药临床试验中最容易被下手的弱势群体。罗根指出，该书披露的细节极为详实沉重，若书中内容纯属虚构，当事人早就对肯尼迪提起诽谤诉讼了。
### [24:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=1488s) 小肯尼迪的环保履历与疫苗中的汞元素争议
辛普森提到自己对小罗伯特·F·肯尼迪心存疑虑，很大程度上是因为他那因痉挛性发声障碍而颤抖沙哑的嗓音，听起来“像个怪人或网络喷子”。罗根则为肯尼迪辩护，提醒辛普森必须了解其过往背景。肯尼迪长期担任顶尖环境律师，战绩彪炳，曾将多家污染河流的大型财阀告上法庭并强令其清理，纽约市东河（East River）的生态治理成效很大程度上归功于他。
罗根讲述了肯尼迪转向疫苗安全审查的契机：在就土壤汞污染与工业毒素巡回演讲时，数名母亲手持厚重材料找到肯尼迪，坚持要求他调查儿童疫苗中的汞添加物。肯尼迪最初对此嗤之以鼻，但在研读文献后震惊于其中的毒理学证据。两人随后探讨了疫苗行业最受争议的问题：国会为疫苗生产商提供了彻底的免责豁免权，使其免于民事诉讼。关于疫苗防腐剂中使用的有机汞化合物，罗根区分了甲基汞与乙基汞（如硫柳汞），指出官方宣称乙基汞代谢排出体外更快，但相关研究同样表明其具有穿透血脑屏障并沉积的潜在风险。
### [27:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=1630s) 疫苗佐剂与丹麦自闭症研究作者被控诈骗
乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）与布莱恩·辛普森（Brian Simpson）首先讨论了疫苗的作用机制。罗根解释道，传统疫苗通常包含灭活的病毒以及一种“刺激物”（佐剂），早期人们曾使用汞（硫柳汞），后来逐渐改用铝等成分。身体通过对这种刺激物产生反应，进而识别其中的灭活病毒并建立免疫抗体；但汞这类物质对人体极其有害。辛普森随口提到科学界最近在一种蛙类肠道细菌中发现了某种潜在物质，甚至有望成为历史上首个兼具治愈作用与自愈式疫苗特性的天然产物。
罗根随即把话题引向自闭症与疫苗的长期争议，并指出一则最新动态：那篇经常被主流引来证明“疫苗绝不导致自闭症”的关键论文的作者，最近因涉嫌重大欺诈在美国被提审。罗根让制作人杰米（Jamie）调出新闻，并敏锐地评论道，随着政治风向转变，福奇（Anthony Fauci）周围那些没有拿到拜登特赦的人，正在陆续受到法律指控和审判。
新闻报道显示，这位被引渡自德国的丹麦医生兼研究人员（保罗·索森，Poul Thorsen），曾参与撰写2002年发表在《新英格兰医学杂志》（NEJM）上的重磅论文。该研究基于50万丹麦儿童的庞大数据样本，强力反驳了麻疹、腮腺炎、风疹三联疫苗（MMR）与自闭症之间的关联。然而，美国司法部指控其涉嫌多项联邦电汇诈骗与洗钱犯罪。
- 2002年《新英格兰医学杂志》（NEJM）基于约50万名丹麦儿童的队列研究，曾是全球否定疫苗与自闭症关联的核心基石文献。
- 该研究主要合作作者之一因涉嫌电汇诈骗与洗钱，从德国被引渡至美国正式受审。
### [29:26](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=1766s) 糖业阴谋与得州的THC禁令：资本如何操纵科学与法律
辛普森开玩笑调侃道：“这年头谁还没洗过点小钱呢？”罗根则直言不讳地指出，这类科学家很可能早在研究初期就拿了黑钱，拿钱做伪证在科学界有着漫长而丑陋的历史。他举出最具代表性的历史案例：上世纪糖业游说集团仅花费约5万美元，就收买了顶尖科学家发表文章，将导致心脏病的罪魁祸首栽赃给胆固醇和饱和脂肪，从而彻底掩盖了高糖饮食的真正危害。两人感叹，收买科学家甚至政客的成本低得惊人，“五万块钱就能买下两个参议员，十万块几乎能搞定任何人”。
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: 商业游说与政策操纵链条
accDescr: 展示利益集团如何通过资金影响研究、政客，最终导致政策与公共健康脱节。
subgraph 资本与操纵 ["资本运作"]
A["传统利益集团<br/>(糖业 / 酒精游说集团)"] -->|"小额资助 / 游说资金<br/>($5万 - $10万)"| B["被收买的学者与政客"]
end
subgraph 输出结果 ["政策与科学结论"]
B --> C["被扭曲的科学结论<br/>(例如：指责脂肪而非糖)"]
B --> D["违背民意的政策<br/>(例如：得州禁止低浓度THC)"]
end
subgraph 公众影响 ["公众后果"]
C --> E["数十年公众健康受损"]
D --> F["阻碍合法替代品，维系旧产业垄断"]
end
```
罗根随后将这种利益勾结联系到得克萨斯州近期的四氢大麻酚（THC）禁令上。尽管得州有超过70%的民众支持合法化，但政府依然强推禁令，背后的核心推手正是酒精游说集团。随着现代年轻人饮酒量锐减，酒企利润暴跌，他们便千方百计扼杀大麻替代品。辛普森直言：“得州完全是靠药物运转的，假装不是的人太虚伪了。”罗根也指出，边界各州药物泛滥，但法律界定合法与非法的标准荒诞至极——普通人只要去诊所谎称“无法集中注意力”，医生就能合法开出阿德拉（Adderall）这种强效中枢神经兴奋剂。
- 糖业集团曾以仅仅5万美元的报酬买通研究，成功将心脏病的病因嫁祸于饱和脂肪。
- 尽管得克萨斯州有70%的公众支持大麻相关合法化，立法机构仍在酒精行业游说压力下推行THC禁令。
### [30:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=1844s) 阿德拉泛滥与对ADD的质疑：注意力缺失是疾病还是天性？
罗根指出，现在无论是高中生还是大学生，阿德拉早已烂大街。许多年轻人碾碎药片用鼻子吸食，其本质和吸食纯冰毒（speed）没有区别，却受到法律的完全保护。辛普森坦承自己从小就被诊断出注意力缺陷障碍（ADD），但每次服药都感觉极其糟糕，大脑被彻底扰乱。
面对罗根关于“ADD到底算不算真实疾病”的追问，辛普森承认自己甚至不认为这是一种真正的病，而更像是一种思维偏好。罗根深入剖析道，这根本不是什么生理疾病，只是“你想事情的方式和别人不一样”。当你面对枯燥乏味的事物时，你自然会感到无聊且不想投入；但只要遇到真正热爱的事物，或者面临燃眉之急的危机时刻，你的专注力就会瞬间爆表，这非但不是缺陷，反而是一种“超能力”。
辛普森深表赞同，并顺势吐槽起自己对行政表格的极端厌恶。他夸张地表示：“如果进天堂必须填一张表格，那我宁可去地狱被火烧。”他痛恨官僚机构反复索要他们本来就掌握的信息，比如把表格寄到你家信箱，第一行却还要你填家庭住址；或者去店里买个轮胎，收银员却非要登记电子邮箱。罗根强调，大多数人讨厌无聊的重复性劳动是完全正常的人类天性，绝不该被轻率地定义为心理疾病。
### [33:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=1988s) 洛克菲勒教育体系、X战警式学校与大药厂的利益链
两人的讨论进一步延伸到教育体制的本质。罗根认为，所谓的“障碍”（Disorder）完全是现代社会强加的标准：社会只想要人去干枯燥乏味、毫无激情的工作，或者强迫充满精力的孩子整天坐在无聊的教室里听讲。一旦孩子注意力涣散，体制便立刻给他们扣上 ADD 的帽子，却忽视了只要把游戏手柄交给这些孩子，或者让他们上场参加体育运动，他们可以连续专注好几个小时。
辛普森回忆起电台主持人汤姆·哈特曼（Thom Hartmann）曾经介绍过的一所坐落在美东北部的先锋学校。在 ADHD 概念普及之前，那所学校专门招收那些被体制判定为“无法专注”的异类学生。学校摒弃了刻板统一的教学大纲，完全采用问题导向型教学——学生对什么感兴趣，老师就顺着问题引导他们去掌握解答该问题所需的通识知识，辛普森将其形容为“X战警里的X教授天才少年学院”。遗憾的是，这种顺应天性的学校最终被官僚体制叫停并关闭。
罗根总结道，现代标准化学校体系最早由洛克菲勒家族深度参与设计，其核心目的从一开始就不是为了启发人类智慧，而是为了将人驯化成听话、准时的工厂螺丝钉工人。而当制药巨头深度介入现代医疗与大众媒体后，整个链条变得更加贪婪：大药厂通过媒体和医疗机构联手发明各种莫须有的“心理障碍”，将原本正常的人格特质病理化，进而向大众长期推销利润惊人的精神类药物。
### [35:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=2145s) 权力顶层的敛财局与政客的炒股神话
Brian Simpson 感叹当今世界仿佛就是一连串精心设计的骗局（"a series of scams"），每个人不过是在选择自己要卷入哪一个局里。Joe Rogan 稍作反驳，认为并非世间万物都是诈骗，比如去农场花钱买鸡蛋就是一手交钱一手交货的实在买卖。但两人随即达成共识：一旦涉及顶层的权钱交易，尤其当政客与能够左右政府决策的超级跨国巨头勾结在一起时，各种巧立名目的骗局便随处可见，其核心目的无非是以最快速度攫取暴利。
两人谈及现行政治体制的扭曲——最初的制度设计绝非让人把参议员当成做一辈子的终身铁饭碗。然而现实中，许多政客在位几十年，靠着微薄的公开薪金，却奇迹般积累了数亿美元的身家，其在股票市场的精准投资回报率更是让顶尖华尔街操盘手都自愧不如。Brian 调侃称，无论哪个党派的议员，只要普通散户能完美镜像跟投他们的持仓，都能赚得盆满钵满。Joe 还提到喜剧演员乔·德罗萨（Joe DeRosa）早年在得克萨斯州参议院工作的经历，德罗萨曾亲眼目睹巨额政治捐款在暗中翻涌，政客们的大部分日常工作本质上不是治理国家，而是马不停蹄地到处拉赞助、搞募捐。
### [37:17](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=2237s) 政治筹款与恐慌营销
谈到政治捐款，Brian 坦言自己向来抗拒给政客送钱，因为让一个自顾不暇的普通人去供养富得流油的政客简直不可理喻（"I need money, right?"）。然而他最近不慎向某位政客捐了一笔钱，随即陷入了无休止的骚扰。一旦把邮箱地址交出去，筹款邮件便铺天盖地而来，每周都在哭穷：“兄弟们，我们真的就差你这一美元了！”Joe 笑着附和，并提到在卡玛拉·哈里斯（Kamala Harris）败选后，民主党阵营依然在紧锣密鼓地向选民广发邮件索要捐款。
Joe 深入剖析了政党的生存逻辑：政客与政治机器必须持续不断地向公众制造恐慌（fear-mongering）。他们需要反复宣扬“天要塌了”、“如果不击败对手就是世界末日”，因为唯有让民众处于持续的焦虑与惊恐中，他们才能保证捐款源源不断地汇入政治金库。
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: 政治筹款与资金运作链路
accDescr: 展示政治实体通过恐慌营销向公众募捐，并结合非政府组织进行资金流转与名义洗钱的过程
subgraph FearCycle["恐慌营销与筹款"]
A["政党与政客"] -->|"渲染危机与末日论调"| B["恐慌的普通选民"]
B -->|"小额频繁捐赠"| A
end
subgraph LaunderingLoop["非政府组织洗钱与名义借用"]
C["政府财政与专项援助资金"] -->|"拨付款项"| D["USAID 及各大 NGO"]
D -->|"套用旧捐赠人名单虚构账目"| E["巨额暗资回流政党金库"]
E -.->|"普通人不知情被挂名大额捐款"| B
end
```
### [38:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=2304s) 非政府组织洗钱黑幕与马斯克的 DOGE 调查
Joe 进一步揭露了更为隐秘的资金暗流：有些挣扎在温饱线上的普通人，名字赫然出现在官方大额政治捐赠名单中，金额动辄高达两万五千美元。这些人过去可能只给某个组织捐过五块钱，名字留在了档案里；幕后操纵者便借用他们的身份，将数额庞大的非政府组织（NGO）资金洗入政党账户。当调查人员实地敲开这些平民的家门询问时，当事人都惊愕不已，表示自己这辈子都没见过两万五千美元的存款。
Joe 指出，这正是埃隆·马斯克（Elon Musk）领导政府效率部（DOGE）清查美国国际开发署（USAID）账目时所触及的核心黑幕。大量纳税人的资金在政府与各大 NGO 之间循环倒手，数十亿乃至数百亿美元不知去向，账目上一片空白，部分资金甚至借道流向了乌克兰等海外地区。Brian 回忆起马斯克刚组建该机构时的对话，直言触碰这些巨额利益集团的蛋糕极其凶险：“你可以去动那些表面上的东西，动那些面向穷人的福利；但一旦你开始动富人的真正利益，他们绝对会让你吃不了兜着走。”Joe 也补充说，马斯克在深入调查医疗补助（Medicaid）欺诈等利益深水区时，曾真切担心过自己会招来杀身之祸。
- 政治募捐洗钱模式：利用以往曾小额捐赠过的人员数据库，虚构大额捐款记录，以规避政治献金来源审查。
- 资金暗流与失控账目：数十亿美元由纳税人支付的政府资金在国际 NGO 和各层机构之间转移，缺乏有效收据与追踪凭证。
- 动摇核心利益的风险：介入医疗补助（Medicaid）欺诈与政府对外援助审查，直接触及既得利益集团的底线。
### [40:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=2445s) 与政客打交道的代价与 USAID 的真实面目
Brian 认为马斯克迟早会认清现实——与政客同床共枕从来没有好下场，政客只把商界大佬当成工具，一旦失去利用价值就会像扔垃圾一样将其抛弃。Joe 则道出了商界领袖的现实困境：如果你不主动去跟政客打交道，你的竞争对手就会乘虚而入，最后倒霉的依然是你自己。
谈到 USAID 的本质，Joe 提到了研究人员迈克·本茨（Mike Benz）的调查结论。Joe 表示，USAID 表面上挂着“国际开发援助”的慈善招牌，实则是中央情报局（CIA）的延伸，专门负责承办那些“连 CIA 都觉得太脏而不便亲自出手的事”，其真正职能往往是在海外策划政权颠覆（regime change）以及资助别国的叛军武装。虽然世上确实存在像海洋守护者协会（Sea Shepherd，致力于打击以科研名义进行非法捕鲸的行为）这样纯粹做实事的非营利慈善组织，但在庞大的 NGO 体系中，充斥着不受监管的资金黑洞。比如在印度等地，NGO 的数量惊人，常年打着“拯救饥饿儿童”的旗号募捐，背后的资金走向却深不可测。
### [43:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=2623s) 病毒式网络迷因：“只要我参与其中，腐败就不是坏事”
对话尾声，Brian 提到了一个风靡网络的搞笑迷因：一位非洲政客在电视采访中一本正经地向公众宣称：“腐败并不是坏事；腐败只有在我没参与时才是坏事。如果我是腐败的一部分，我就会捍卫它。”（"Corruption is only bad if I'm not involved. But if I'm part of that corruption, I'll defend it."）
这番惊世骇俗的话让现场大笑起来。Joe 听完视频原声后冷静分析，指出这大概率是媒体或网友断章取义的恶搞剪辑。该政客更可能是在讽刺和描述那些深陷腐败泥潭、千方百计为自身特权辩护的人，而非真的在坦白自己的无耻嘴脸。Brian 笑着承认，自己看迷因时确实只顾着图一乐，从未去深究过发言前后的原始语境。
### [44:35](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=2675s) 讽刺修辞与腐败的心理滑坡
制作人杰米查证了一段引发争论的发言背景，确认说话者并非腐败政客，而是一位人权活动家。该发言实际上采用了夸张的讽刺修辞，意在批判人们在面对自身利益时对腐败采取的自私态度。乔·罗根对自己的直觉得到证实感到欣慰，他指出这人听起来并非贪婪之徒，而是对腐败现象深恶痛绝。布莱恩·辛普森也赞同这一观点，认为许多人只要自己能从中分得一杯羹，就会想方设法为腐败辩护。
罗根深入剖析了政治腐败的诱因与心理防线瓦解的过程。当一名普通议员看着身边的同行变得“富得流油”，而自己却还要为偿还房贷、送孩子进好学校以及支付豪车租金而苦苦挣扎时，心理防线往往开始动摇。他们会自我合理化，认为搞一点无伤大雅的“小花招”只要能为选区办成好事也无可厚非。然而，这种妥协往往是滑坡的开端，紧接着大企业介入、工会被打压，甚至最终陷入勒索的泥潭——无论是被爱泼斯坦掌握把柄、在不知情下接触到外国间谍，还是被类似詹姆斯·奥基夫（James O'Keefe）那样的卧底调查记者暗中录音。
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: 政治腐败的滑坡效应
accDescr: 描述政客如何从同侪压力和经济负担逐步滑向被利益集团与勒索完全控制的过程。
subgraph 心理动摇与自我合理化
A["同侪压力与经济窘境<br/>(房贷、子女教育、对比暴富同行)"] --> B["自我辩护的妥协<br/>('为了选区利益搞点小花招')"]
end
subgraph 利益绑定与深度渗透
B --> C["企业利益介入<br/>(资助进驻、打压工会)"]
C --> D["把柄被控与勒索陷阱<br/>(间谍接头、勒索录音、爱泼斯坦丑闻)"]
end
```
### [46:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=2794s) 刻意保持“无知”与政坛间谍八卦
当罗根提到詹姆斯·奥基夫时，辛普森坦言自己完全不知道这号人物。罗根感叹辛普森对时政信息的匮乏，辛普森则解释称，自己是刻意在极高程度上“管好自己的事”，因为不追逐铺天盖地的时事新闻反而能让自己保持“不被污染的独到见解”。他认为如今的新闻在告知事实的同时，总是在灌输受众“应该如何去感受”。
两人随即聊起了政坛丑闻，罗根提及曾引发全美轰动的华人间谍“芳芳”（Christine Fang）事件，辛普森对此也一无所知，甚至误将其与参议院少数党领袖米奇·麦康奈尔（Mitch McConnell）的妻子混为一谈，打趣说麦康奈尔“早就死透了”。罗根笑着澄清麦康奈尔不仅活着，最近还公开举着当天的报纸自证存活，但辛普森调侃大家分明在电视直播的新闻发布会上亲眼目睹他当场“死机”过半天。
- **芳芳（Christine Fang）**：涉嫌渗透美国加州政界的中国情报人员，曾与多名民主党政客建立密切关联。
- **信息过载的反思**：辛普森坚持远离即时新闻推送，以防被媒体的情绪预设立场绑架创作思维。
### [47:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=2860s) 参议院里的“人体冰雕”与权力瘾头
话题顺势转向麦康奈尔在参议院议事厅里的离奇举止。罗根提到了一段长达十几个小时的监控视频，画面中周围所有议员都在频繁走动、交头接耳，唯独麦康奈尔端坐不动长达数小时，宛如入定的“禅宗大师”。辛普森调侃那场景就像经典喜剧电影《老板度假去》（Weekend at Bernie's）里的装尸体把戏，甚至怀疑旁边坐着的议员才是操控他的幕后黑手，负责在他表决时按下按钮。罗根还补充说，麦康奈尔有次在投票表决时走错方向投错了票，助手提醒后才被纠正过来。
这种高龄政客死守职位的现象引发了两人的深思。从坐在轮椅上神志不清却依然被推去投票的黛安·范斯坦（Dianne Feinstein），到坚持不退休的露丝·巴德·金斯伯格（Ruth Bader Ginsburg），权力的黏性令人唏嘘。辛普森不解地发问，这些人早就名利双收，为什么不退休回家含饴弄孙？罗根指出，权力已经构成了他们生命的全部身份认同，而且对财富的欲望永无止境，人一旦达到某个阶层就会习以为常，并迫切想要更上一层楼。
- **黛安·范斯坦（Dianne Feinstein）**：加州资深参议员，晚年身体机能严重退化仍被推上参议院参与关键法案投票。
- **露丝·巴德·金斯伯格（Ruth Bader Ginsburg）**：最高法院大法官，病重期间拒绝在民主党执政期退休，最终病逝后席位被保守派接替。
- **权力与身份绑定**：“你是来自某州的尊贵参议员，这就是你认为的自己；他们永远不会觉得自己足够富有。”
### [50:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=3014s) 国会委员会门槛、双党合谋与中东利益链
辛普森认为在参议员这一级别几乎可以为所欲为，罗根则反驳称，除非涉足内幕交易等灰色地带，廉洁的议员实际生活水平也就相当于年薪17万美元的普通体面阶层，比如蒂姆·伯切特（Tim Burchett）等少数议员就几乎没有这类经济丑闻。然而辛普森一针见血地指出，所谓“干净的政客”往往只是因为任职资历尚浅，体制绝不会让不配合规则的新人掌握实权：
> “他们根本不会让新人进入核心委员会，除非你按规矩玩。只有进入委员会并担任主席，你才算掌握了真正的权力，因为那时你才能直接跟各大行业打交道，而他们也会开始向你行贿；或者等你退休后直接去给他们打工。”
辛普森进一步讽刺，无论两党在电视公众面前骂得多么不可开交，只要涉及给国会议员自身涨薪，投票时从来都是全票赞成、毫无争议；同样地，两党至今谁也不愿推动立法彻底禁止国会议员进行股票内幕交易，也不愿彻底公开爱泼斯坦案的完整名单或肯尼迪遇刺案档案。在谈到美国政界对以色列无条件且盲目的支持时，罗根和辛普森一致认为，其核心驱动力无外乎拿钱游说、把柄勒索，抑或是麦克·哈克比（Mike Huckabee）这类原教旨主义基督徒出于《圣经》末世预言的狂热执念。最后，话题顺势拐向了杰米在录制前与他们探讨的摩西与《旧约》故事。
### [52:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=3178s) 摩西、致幻荆棘与宗教创立者的超凡魅力
布莱恩·辛普森（Brian Simpson）与乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）从《出埃及记》第三章中摩西与燃烧荆棘的经典神话切入展开探讨。摩西目睹了一丛燃烧却未被烧毁的荆棘，上帝的使者向他传话，命令他脱下鞋子，因为所站之地是圣地。随后在不同版本的圣经叙事中，摩西被赐予或找到了刻有十诫的石板；当他携石板下山看到以色列众人正在膜拜金牛犊时，愤怒地摔碎了石板，之后不得不重新制作。辛普森回顾自己对早期语言和楔形文字的研究，不禁质疑在那个极度原始的时代，究竟有多少人真正具备读写能力；加之流传的一种假说认为燃烧的植物可能是金合欢树（Acacia），摩西当时很可能是吸入了金合欢释放的高浓度 DMT 而产生了强烈的幻觉体验。
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: 摩西神话与致幻荆棘假说逻辑图
accDescr: 展示从摩西目击燃烧荆棘到现代学者提出的DMT致幻假说推导过程。
subgraph BiblicalNarrative ["传统圣经叙事"]
A["目睹燃烧荆棘<br/>未被烈火焚毁"] --> B["听闻神谕传达<br/>获授十诫石板"]
B --> C["下山见膜拜金牛犊<br/>怒砸石板后重制"]
end
subgraph PsychedelicTheory ["现代学术与致幻假说"]
D["金合欢属植物富含DMT"] --> E["燃烧释放致幻气体并被大量吸入"]
E --> F["产生神游幻象、遭遇超自然实体"]
F -.解释.-> B
end
```
罗根对此表示赞同，指出耶路撒冷大学的部分学者早就提出过类似的理论：燃烧的荆棘本质上属于一种强效致幻植物。吸食 DMT 会让人产生极其狂乱的视觉体验并遭遇未知的高维实体，摩西当年极有可能就是吸入了大剂量的天然 DMT。辛普森由此联想到摩门教创始人约瑟夫·斯密（Joseph Smith）宣称在树林里挖出金页片的传说，感叹这些宗教创始人的个人魅力必须强大到匪夷所思的地步，才能让信徒毫不怀疑地全盘接受——"嘿，我刚才去了趟树林，跟上帝当面说了话，上帝告诉我所有的规矩都在这儿，这可不是我自己瞎编的。"如果换作今天有人跑来这么说，绝大多数具备清醒头脑的人只会嗤之以鼻。
---
### [56:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=3387s) 邪教领袖的权力操纵与喜剧演员的逃离反叛
罗根指出，他和辛普森都属于典型的"低信任度个体"（Low-trust individuals），对权威天然带着戒备与强烈的怀疑主义，绝不会一听到离奇说法就轻易相信，尤其是当对方开始开口要钱时。然而世上存在大量极度缺乏自信、意志薄弱而极易被蛊惑的人，往往一头栽进各种邪教之中。罗根提到自己差点在奥斯汀买下的 One World Theatre，其背后曾牵涉到一个荒诞的邪教（Buddhafield 邪教，见纪录片《圣洁地狱》）：头目原本是个拍色情片出身的催眠师，后来转型为瑜伽教练，借由对学员的心智操纵建立起整个教派。瑜伽领域虽然不乏热爱和平、真诚助人的导师，但也屡屡出现滥用精神权威的恶徒，比如热瑜伽创始人比克拉姆·乔杜里（Bikram Choudhury），生活奢靡疯狂，开着劳斯莱斯，利用领袖权力染指并性侵大批女学员甚至信众的妻子——"上帝告诉我，我可以睡你的老婆"几乎成了邪教领袖万变不离其宗的典型套路。
辛普森感叹喜剧圈内居然有数量惊人的脱口秀演员出身于邪教或曾从极端宗教家庭逃脱，比如库尔特·梅茨格（Kurt Metzger）和艾比·罗森奎斯特（Abby Rosenquist）。罗根特别提到了阿里·沙菲尔（Ari Shaffir）：
> "阿里曾经是极端正统派犹太教徒，每天研读《妥拉》长达 12 个小时，在以色列的基布兹集体农场生活，过着彻底遵循教条的日子。直到二十岁出头，他突然醒悟过来：'这他妈全是胡扯，我们到底在干什么？'于是他做出了 180 度大转弯，成为了一名脱口秀演员。"
正因为经历过那种被极端宗教教条窒息的环境，沙菲尔如今对任何规则、权威以及试图规训他人思想行为的说教者有着本能般的强力抗拒。
---
### [59:29](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=3569s) 道德说教心理与尼采的主奴道德论
辛普森认为现实中最讽刺的一点在于，那些把"教导别人该如何生活"当作全部人设与追求的人，私底下的实际生活往往一塌糊涂，充斥着见不得光的卑劣勾当。罗根将这种心理进一步延伸到没有子女的人群身上，特别是部分激进的自由派女性：她们往往把整个世界当作自己未曾生育的孩子来对待，成天对世界挑三拣四、指手画脚，为环境、选票、人权、移民等宏大议题过度焦虑并四处训斥大众，本质上是在用向外投射的道德优越感来填补自身母职的缺失。
辛普森随后提到了抵制文化（Cancel culture）背后的哲学根源，指出这完美契合了弗里德里希·尼采（Friedrich Nietzsche）在 1887 年著作《道德的谱系》（*On the Genealogy of Morality*）中阐述的"主人道德"与"奴隶道德"体系：
| 道德维度 | 主人道德（Master Morality） | 奴隶道德（Slave Morality） |
|:--- |:--- |:--- |
| **创造阶级** | 强盛、富有且充满生命力的统治阶级 | 处于受压迫地位的弱者与被奴役阶层 |
| **核心定义** | 向内审视并肯定自我，将自身拥有的力量、高贵、美貌、财富与勇气定义为"善" | 反应性与防御性系统，将统治阶层所代表的一切优势判定为"恶"，将自身的弱小反衬为"善" |
| **次要对立** | 将平庸、低下与粗鄙定义为次要的"低劣"（Bad），而非本质上的"邪恶"（Evil） | 必须通过道德审判与惩罚强者来证明自身存在的合理性 |
| **心理动因** | 肯定自我的主动行动与成就实现 | 源于深层的怨恨与嫉妒（*Ressentiment*） |
罗根查阅资料并朗读了尼采对两种道德系统的剖析，强调奴隶道德本质上是一种防御性的、源于深仇积怨（Ressentiment）的价值评判方式；辛普森指出，现代网络审判和道德绑架者正是借由将强者的一切定义为邪恶、将弱者的姿态美化为纯洁，来为自己惩罚和打压他人寻找正当性借口。
### [01:02:38](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=3758s) 奴隶道德与“取消文化”的心理机制
对话由尼采关于主人道德与奴隶道德的哲学理论切入。在探讨中，奴隶道德源自被压迫者或“羊群”内心的怨恨与无力感。在被压迫者的定义中，他们感到恐惧或无法企及的主人特质——例如权力、骄傲、财富与力量——被视作“恶”；而所谓的“善”则是作为对恶的反动而诞生，被赋予了与主人特质截然相反的内涵，如赞美谦逊、温顺、服从、同理心与宽恕。乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）随即指出，现代的“取消文化”（Cancel Culture）与这种传统道德有着明显的断层，因为它既缺乏宽恕，也完全不具备对异见者的同理心。
布莱恩·辛普森（Brian Simpson）进一步分享了他在某位女性演讲者那里听到的剖析：人性本身包罗万象，但许多人却急于将自己归类为纯粹的正义方，并以此来强化自身的道德感。他将其转化为通俗的表达：“每个人其实都在找一个由头来展现自己最恶劣的一面。”人们渴望宣泄内心的刻薄与恶意，而实现这一点的捷径，就是先将别人定义为“坏人”。一旦对方被贴上坏人标签，极端的暴行便师出有名——人们会借口“我平时绝不可能烧别人的房子，但谁让他们投票支持了某人”或者“我通常绝不会冲着别人的孩子吼叫，但他车上贴了那个贴纸”。布莱恩指出，人们必须通过界定他人的不堪，来宣扬自己的崇高道德。
罗根表示理解并认为这是软弱之人的做法，但布莱恩强调这就是人类的天性；罗根则坚称，无法客观审视自己为什么发怒本身就是一种心理上的弱点。尽管每个人都有盲区，但正视盲区才是关键。
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: 道德优越感与恶意宣泄机制
accDescr: 展示将他人定义为邪恶如何导致自身恶意行为合理化的心理流转过程。
subgraph Defense ["道德归因"]
A["群体怨恨与无力感"] --> B["将对方特质/立场定义为'恶'"]
end
subgraph Rationalization ["恶意合理化"]
B --> C["确立自身的绝对道德正确"]
C --> D["解除日常道德约束<br/>'寻找展现最恶一面的理由'"]
end
subgraph Action ["外化攻击"]
D --> E["暴力与攻击行为合理化<br/>烧房子、辱骂他人孩子、网暴"]
end
```
---
### [01:04:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=3867s) 对死亡的反应与同情心的性别差异
两人随后探讨了人们面对坏消息时的本能反应。罗根提到，当人们听说某人去世时，第一反应往往是追问：“他是怎么死的？”布莱恩敏锐地分析，人们追问死因往往是在“寻找一个不用去在乎的理由”。如果得知死者是因为做了极其愚蠢的事情而丧命（例如“把自己绑在火箭上”），人们心里反而会暗自松一口气，心想“谢天谢地，我不用为他难过了”。
罗根反驳称自己从不刻意去寻找不关心的理由，但承认如果有人死于极度愚蠢的行径，人们确实很难产生深切的悲伤，而这种因蠢事丧命的情况在男性中更为普遍。布莱恩打趣道，如果是男人在奔牛节上被公牛顶穿屁股致死，他会觉得滑稽并反问“兄弟你到底在干嘛”；但对于女性的死亡，他几乎从未笑过，甚至完全无法幸灾乐祸。
布莱恩自嘲道，自己从父母双亲那里遗传了极其强势的“救风尘基因”（Captain Save a Hoe gene），完全不是隐性遗传，而是显性特征。他坦言自己是个彻头彻尾的软心肠，只要看到女孩子流眼泪，立刻就会举手投降：“行行行，都给你，你要什么都拿走。”罗根笑着评价他本质上是个善良、富有同理心的人，但也提醒这种性格一旦遇到心术不正的女人，极易被利用和操纵。布莱恩对此深表赞同，表示唯有经历过多次被操纵的教训，学会识别其行为模式，或者寻找真正善良的人，才能彻底摆脱这种困境。
- **死因追问心理**：布莱恩认为人们询问死因常常是为了免除情感负担；罗根则认为是评估悲伤程度的标尺。
- **同情心倾向**：布莱恩坦承面对女性的眼泪完全没有抵抗力，极易因心软妥协。
---
### [01:06:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=3978s) 奥斯汀第六街的街头女战神
谈及女性受伤的视频时，罗根与布莱恩回忆起网络上的街头斗殴切片。罗根兴奋地描述他在网上看到的一段发生在奥斯汀著名的第六街（Sixth Street）的冲突视频：一名墨西哥裔女子在街头群殴中展现出了统治级别的战斗力。
罗根详述了该女子的动作细节：普通的白人姑娘打架往往姿势极差，身体向后倾斜的同时乱挥拳头，毫无杀伤力；而这名墨西哥女子身材敦实，脱掉鞋子后下巴微收，借助转髋和转肩的全身联动力量，直接甩出如同 UFC 传奇选手阿曼达·努涅斯（Amanda Nunes）一般的毁灭性大摆拳。
杰米（Jamie）在演播室电脑上调出视频，两人一起反复倒带观看慢动作重播：
- **致命右拳与抱摔**：视频中该女子一记精准强力的重拳直接击倒了正转头看向别处的对手，对手毫无防备，瞬间“直线停机”（Flatlined），后脑重重反弹在水泥地面上，伴随着脚部的抽搐。随后该女子又利落地接上了一记漂亮的转髋抱摔（Hip toss），并进行凶猛的地面砸拳（Ground and pound）。
- **专业级击打机制**：罗根大为赞叹，指出这记重拳蹬地、转髋、送肩一气呵成，属于教科书级别的打击力量，“如果我是她的教练，我会兴奋地高呼打得太棒了”，甚至开玩笑想当场把她引荐签约到 UFC。
- **街斗的致命危险**：两人在感叹之余也收敛了神色，一致强调拥有这种重拳的人在街斗中极度危险，因为受害者倒地时后脑砸在地面上的反弹冲击力极易致人死亡。
---
### [01:09:47](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=4187s) 青春期的冲动与爱尔兰酒吧的过往
看到暴力街斗的惨烈后果，布莱恩感叹自己终于到了不再想跟任何人打架的年纪。他回忆道，人在二十来岁年轻气盛的时候，总是满脑子想着“谁怕谁，来碰碰看”，殊不知那种鲁莽的冲动在现实中有无数种走向灾难的可能。
罗根表示赞同，并梳理了自己的格斗经历。他表示自己在整个生涯中极少卷入真正的无规则街头斗殴，除了高中及更早之前打过几场架之外，他的绝大部分格斗都是在受控、有裁判、双方均有准备的专业正规比赛中进行的。罗根回忆，自己最后一次经历严重的斗殴事件，还是在他早年于一家爱尔兰酒吧担任保镖门卫（Doorman）的时候。众所周知，爱尔兰酒吧向来是斗殴的高发地，罗根正准备展开讲述当年在酒吧门口遭遇的一名挑衅男子的冲突细节。
### [01:10:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=4237s) 圣迭戈酒吧门口的无妄之灾
Brian Simpson 回忆起自己在加利福尼亚州圣迭戈市（类似于奥斯汀第六街那种酒吧街，好像是在亚当斯大道 Adams Avenue）当酒吧保安时遇到的一桩离奇暴力事件。当时一对情侣前来酒吧，女方带了身份证件，男方却忘记携带，于是男方返回去取证件，一去就是一个小时。期间被留在酒吧的女方喝得酩酊大醉，不停地跑出店门找 Brian 喋喋不休地聊天。Brian 直言，喝醉酒的人最典型的特征就是会把十分钟前刚讲过的事翻来覆去重讲一遍。
最后一次女子出来找他搭话时，顺手把手机落在了 Brian 身旁的小桌子上。不久后女子再次出来抽烟，这时取完证件的男友突然从她身后现身，像偶像剧般把她抱了起来，尽显浪漫柔情。Brian 见状便好心提醒：“嘿，你的手机落下了”，并转过身指了指桌上的手机。然而毫无防备之际，那个男的竟猛然一拳重击在 Brian 脸上，力道大到让 Brian 的头狠狠撞在门框上。
被激怒的 Brian 立刻还手，将对方按在地上暴打一顿。圣迭戈警方迅速赶到现场并将两人都戴上手铐，但酒吧的工作人员立刻站出来替 Brian 说话，证明他是酒吧员工，完全是无辜遭袭。警察询问 Brian 想怎么处理，Brian 表示只想让对方滚蛋。后来 Brian 得知，那个男的当晚在别处把自己的女友暴打了一顿，最终被捕。整件事最让 Brian 感到毛骨悚然又荒诞的是，当他动手反击痛揍对方时，那个男人的脸上竟然完全是一副真正困惑的表情，反复惊叫：“你为什么打我？到底发生什么事了？”——就好像他完全不记得自己上一秒刚毫无缘由地狠狠揍了保安一拳。Joe Rogan 推测对方可能嗑了药、有严重心理疾病或情绪失调（Emotional Dysregulation）。Brian 补充强调，对方当时绝不是在演戏以博取路人同情，而是从大脑深处真正陷入了认知混乱。
---
### [01:13:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=4385s) 格斗场隐形眼镜与荒唐致死的幽默边界
Joe Rogan 询问 Brian 被打时是否戴着眼镜，指出戴着眼镜挨拳头是极其危险的。Brian 表示自己当时本该戴眼镜但并没有戴，因为他也是直到最近才开始认真对待视力问题。Rogan 顺着眼部话题提到，UFC 中有些选手甚至会戴着隐形眼镜进八角笼比赛。他认识一个年轻小伙子，隐形眼镜掉在垫子上后居然捡起来直接塞回眼睛里，结果眼球严重感染葡萄球菌（Staph Infection），造成了终身不可挽回的重创。
两人由此探讨了人类对“蠢事与悲剧”的幽默边界：
- **无害的蠢事**：绝对搞笑；
- **自食恶果的愚蠢**：好笑程度一半一半；
- **试图害人却反害自身的愚蠢**：百分之百纯粹的好笑（比如某人挥拳打人却自己脚下一滑摔下楼梯摔断了腿）。
Brian 坦言，每当听说有人过世，他的第一反应永远是“他是怎么死的？”。他极其反感那种“出于尊重家属，死因保密”的说法，因为如果不知道死因，他就不知道自己该对此抱有同情还是觉得荒唐。Rogan 借此联想到了自己在脱口秀舞台上常讲的一个段子：一名传教士冒死去与世隔绝的原始部落送《圣经》，结果刚上岛就被岛民乱箭射死——根本没有人会替那个传教士感到惋惜，因为大家心底都信奉“管好你自己的闲事”（Mind your own business）。
---
### [01:14:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=4490s) 北森蒂纳尔岛的创伤历史与殖民病原浩劫
Joe Rogan 解释说，其实那些原始部落——例如北森蒂纳尔岛（North Sentinel Island）的岛民——之所以对所有外来者抱有极端的敌意和攻击性，是有深层历史原因的。在历史上，英国皇家海军军官莫里斯·维达尔·波特曼（Maurice Vidal Portman）曾以探索者的身份造访安达曼群岛，此人举止变态怪异，不仅强行给岛民穿上奇装异服拍照，还在日记里极其细致地描绘岛民的身体隐私（甚至记录一名成年男子的睾丸仅有麻雀蛋大小）。更糟糕的是，殖民者当年曾绑架了两名老人和几名儿童带回文明世界，老人很快因感染疾病去世，生病的孩子被送回岛上后，引发了灾难性的疫情。岛民因长期与世隔绝，对外界病毒完全没有免疫力。
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: 欧洲病原体传入美洲大陆致死链
accDescr: 展示欧洲移民定居生活环境中的病菌，如何传播至缺乏免疫力的美洲原住民并导致巨幅人口锐减。
subgraph EuropeSqualor ["欧洲殖民者的生活环境与病原体"]
A["城市脏乱卫生差<br/>随地倾倒排泄物 / 污水污染水源"] --> B["致命病原体积聚<br/>天花、麻疹、流感、斑疹伤寒"]
end
subgraph NativeDestruction ["美洲原住民的浩劫"]
C["游牧式生活<br/>如科曼奇人，洁净且迁徙"] -.-> D["接触外来病原体"]
B ==> D
D ==> E["免疫系统缺乏抗体<br/>大范围流行病如野火蔓延"]
E ==> F["大陆性人口毁灭<br/>50% 至 95% 原住民死于疾病"]
end
```
话题随后自然过渡到美洲原住民的毁灭史。Rogan 与 Brian 现场使用 AI 搜索引擎 Perplexity 查询欧洲定居者带来的疾病对北美印第安人造成的伤亡比例：
- 数据显示，在欧洲人接触后的许多受灾地区，约有 **50% 至 90%** 的原住民死于流行病；
- 某些更早的泛大陆统计数据估计，疾病导致的死亡率甚至高达 **90% 至 95%**；
- 肆虐的疾病包括天花（Smallpox）、麻疹（Measles）、流感（Influenza）和斑疹伤寒（Typhus）等。
Rogan 感叹，虽然针对原住民的屠杀确实存在，但绝大多数人口实质上是被病毒消灭的。当时像科曼奇人（Comanche）等原住民过着游牧生活，逐水草而迁徙，环境相对洁净；反观当时的欧洲人则生活在粪便乱倒、街道满是马粪、污水倒灌进饮用水源的极度恶劣脏乱之中。由于彼时欧洲医学界还深信“瘴气说”（Miasma/Vapors）和灵魂失衡理论，没人把饮用水受污染和下流爆发疾病联系起来，这种愚昧和脏乱最终给美洲带去了近乎灭顶的灾难，直到后来第一位倡导洗手的医生出现才开始打破这种蒙昧。
### [01:19:16](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=4756s) 伊格纳兹·塞麦尔维斯与“洗手”的代价：被嘲讽的先驱
乔·罗根与布莱恩·辛普森聊起了现代医学建立前匪夷所思的卫生状况。在过去的很长一段时间里，医生们在给人做手术或接生前，根本没有任何人觉得有洗手的必要。他们压根不知道手上沾满了病菌和致病源。罗根感叹，历史上第一个提出“我觉得我们应该先把手洗干净”的医生不仅没有被奉为先贤，反而当场遭到了同行的无情嘲弄与排挤。辛普森好奇地追问这个人究竟是谁，为什么全人类没有好好纪念他，毕竟从拯救生命的总量来看，这个人挽救的生命可能比历史上任何人都多。在显微镜普及之前，医学界对感染的认知基本全靠瞎猜。
通过查询资料，这位先驱的名字浮出水面——伊格纳兹·塞麦尔维斯（Ignaz Semmelweis）。辛普森立刻开玩笑吐槽：“怪不得我们不纪念他，这名字念起来太拗口了！一个人可不能连名带姓都这么难念。”塞麦尔维斯是拥有德国血统的匈牙利医生兼科学家，被后世尊称为“母亲们的救星”（Savior of Mothers）。在19世纪，产褥热（Puerperal fever / Childbed fever）在产科极为常见且致死率极高。塞麦尔维斯在1847年敏锐地发现，维也纳综合医院第一产科诊所（由医生和医学生主导）的产妇死亡率竟然是接生婆诊所的三倍之多（thrice the mortality）。他随即强制推行用次氯酸钙溶液（chlorinated lime solution）洗手消毒的制度，让感染率瞬间断崖式下跌。
这篇历史资料不仅让两人惊叹于当年的医学愚昧，还引发了一段关于词汇的幽默插曲。看到资料里的“产科的”（obstetrical）一词，辛普森打趣道，人活着到了59岁，竟然有些词一次都没说过，直到今天冷不丁冒出来；而对于“thrice”（三次）这个极为书面古雅的词，辛普森直言现实中根本没人会这么讲话，“如果你在日常聊天里说出‘thrice’，你绝对是在硬装高深”。这又让他联想到了自己最爱的词之一“tertiary”（第三级的/第三的），辛普森笑着说：“在学会这个词之前，我形容第三层意思只能笨拙地说是‘比次要更次要’（secondary but more），直到听到‘tertiary’，我才觉得找到了救星。”
---
### [01:21:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=4900s) 精神病院的暴行与李施德林的诞生：灭菌理论的确立
然而，塞麦尔维斯的人生结局却是一场彻头彻尾的时代悲剧。当时的主流医学界不仅全盘拒绝他的发现，更对他的理论充满敌意。一方面，由于当时微生物致病论尚未诞生，塞麦尔维斯无法从理论层面科学解释洗手为何能降低死亡率；另一方面，绅士阶层的医生们感到人格受到了严重侮辱——在他们看来，一位体面的绅士医生，双手怎么可能会是“肮脏的”并带去死亡？医生们在同行评审和公开场合对他极尽冷嘲热讽。到了1865年，屡遭打击且言辞愈发激愤的塞麦尔维斯精神崩溃，最终被同事们合谋强行关进了精神病院。在入院仅14天后，他遭到疯人院守卫的残暴殴打，因右手伤口感染坏疽而凄惨死去。
罗根与辛普森对这一荒诞的结局唏嘘不已：一个毕生致力于对抗致命感染、倡导清洁消毒的人，最后竟然因为呼吁大家洗手而被同行打进疯人院，并因伤口细菌感染丧命。直到路易·巴斯德（Louis Pasteur）通过实验证实了微生物致病论（Germ Theory），塞麦尔维斯当年的观察才终于获得了科学解释。紧接着，英国外科医生约瑟夫·李斯特（Joseph Lister）在巴斯德研究的基础上，将防腐灭菌法成功引入外科手术中，从而掀起了现代医学的彻底变革。
看到屏幕上李斯特那篇篇幅惊人的维基百科页面，罗根由衷感叹这个人一生干了海量实事，医学史应该感谢这些埋头研究病菌的人。他们还顺便查证了著名的漱口水品牌“李施德林”（Listerine），证实该品牌正是于1879年由其发明者为了向约瑟夫·李斯特致敬而命名的。
---
### [01:24:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=5051s) 漱口水会削弱运动表现？口腔菌群、一氧化氮与过度清洁的隐忧
聊到李施德林，罗根顺势把话题带到了日常使用的漱口水上。他透露自己之前读过相关研究，指出长期使用抗菌漱口水可能对人体并非益事，甚至可能削弱运动员的训练表现与恢复能力。辛普森对此深表认同，并类比了抗生素对人体肠道菌群的摧毁效果——任何在服用抗生素期间尝试高强度健身的人都知道，身体会感到前所未有的精疲力竭。辛普森还顺势聊起了格斗圈的盘外招，好奇询问是否有选手故意让自己发臭来干扰对手。罗根肯定地表示，巴西柔术界过去经常有人故意不洗道袍（Gi），让衣服发酵出一股刺鼻的氨水臭味，以此在缠斗中恶心对手。
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: 抗菌漱口水对一氧化氮生成及运动机能的影响路径
accDescr: 展示了从摄入硝酸盐、口腔细菌还原，到一氧化氮生成及血管舒张的生化链条，以及抗菌漱口水对其的阻断作用。
subgraph INTAKE["膳食摄入"]
A["富含硝酸盐食物<br/>（如甜菜根、深色绿叶菜）"]
end
subgraph MOUTH["口腔环境"]
B["口腔特定共生菌群"]
C["亚硝酸盐 (Nitrite)"]
D["抗菌漱口水<br/>（无差别杀灭口腔菌）"]
end
subgraph BODY["心血管与肌肉系统"]
E["一氧化氮 (Nitric Oxide / NO)"]
F["血管扩张 / 血流调节"]
G["肌肉氧合能力与耐力表现"]
end
A --> B
B --> C
D -.->|"抑制/杀灭"| B
C --> E
E --> F
F --> G
```
随后，罗根让导播用 Perplexity 进行了现场检索。搜索结果证实了该理论的生理学依据：深色绿叶蔬菜和甜菜根中富含膳食硝酸盐，人体本身无法直接利用，必须依赖口腔后部的特定共生菌群将其还原为亚硝酸盐；进入人体后，亚硝酸盐再被转化为一氧化氮（Nitric Oxide）。一氧化氮是一种强效血管舒张剂，负责调节血流、血压以及运动中和运动后的肌肉氧供。虽然目前尚无确凿证据证明抗菌漱口水会显著拖慢健康人群的冲刺速度或力量，但频繁使用抗菌漱口水确实会杀死这批关键细菌，从而削弱身体生成一氧化氮的能力。
罗根提到，很多健身爱好者和运动员会在训练前喝甜菜根浓缩汁（Beetroot shots）来提高耐力。辛普森开玩笑说，顶级运动员追求哪怕1%的细微优势，如果漱口水真的会偷走你在第四、第五回合的体能储备，那运动员宁可顶着一口臭气去比赛，“做一个嘴巴发臭的世界冠军（funky breath champion）也没什么不好的，总比输了强”。罗根笑着澄清，保持口气清新完全可以靠正常刷牙，只要不用那种毁灭性的抗菌漱口水就行。两人由此进一步引申反思：现代人动辄使用强效肥皂洗澡、频繁消毒，或许也是皮肤感染频发的原因之一——因为这种极端的清洁习惯把人体表面千百年来保护宿主的皮肤共生菌群彻底“核平”了。从自然演化的角度来看，人类如果天生必须时刻把自己洗得一尘不染才不会生病，这在逻辑上根本说不通。
### [01:28:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=5286s) 动物的天生清洁力、野生野猪与“世界上最脏的人”
对话从动物的清洁习惯聊起。Brian Simpson 提到自家的狗即使一周不洗澡也完全没问题，除非跳进泳池或湖里弄脏，否则平时只要每周送去一次宠物美容店即可。他由此联想到人体机能：如果把家猪放归野外，即便给它装上追踪器，过段时间找回来时它早就变成了一只外形和习性完全不同的野兽；人类若是被长期放归自然，身体机能很可能也会发生改变，甚至不再需要像现代人一样频繁洗澡。Joe Rogan 对此表示赞同，指出这种适应机制在皮肤微生态上完全讲得通，古代文献中确实很少记载大范围的体臭或皮肤卫生灾难。
随后两人聊到了著名的奇闻轶事——伊朗“世界上最脏的人”（阿莫·哈吉，Amou Haji）。Rogan 回忆起网上一张广为流传的照片，画面中一位满脸污垢、胡子拉碴的老人正同时抽着四根香烟。据说这位老人长达60年没有洗澡，享年94岁；而讽刺的是，村民们好心劝说并强行帮他洗了生平第一次澡后，他没过几个月便去世了。Rogan 让后台用 Perplexity 搜索核实，证实确有其事：尽管相关性并不等同于因果关系，但他确实在村民劝说沐浴后的几个月内离世。
检索页面随后引出了另一位英国历史上的奇人——被称为“脏迪克”（Dirty Dick）的伦敦商人 Nathaniel Bentley。根据记录，Bentley 早年出身良好且受过高等教育，精通多门语言，年轻时衣着考究、风度翩翩；然而在他大婚之日未婚妻不幸猝死，遭受重创的他从此彻底自暴自弃、放弃洗漱，终生邋遢度日。
- **阿莫·哈吉（Amou Haji）**：伊朗老人，被称为“世界上最脏的人”，据称60年不洗澡，享年94岁；在村民劝导沐浴数月后去世。
- **内森尼尔·本特利（Nathaniel Bentley / Dirty Dick）**：18世纪英国商人，年轻时为受良好教育的雅士，因未婚妻在婚礼当日猝逝而万念俱灰，从此不再洗澡清洁。
---
### [01:30:39](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=5439s) 安大略湖更名风波与五大湖水系通道
话题随后转向一条时政新闻：有消息称安大略湖（Lake Ontario）被特朗普提议或宣布更名为“美国湖”（Lake America），甚至可能进一步打起大西洋和太平洋命名的主意。Brian Simpson 感到不可思议，追问安大略湖横跨美加边境、历史上一直被称为安大略湖，改名究竟有何实质意义。Rogan 调侃政客们最喜欢无中生有制造问题再去解决，借此显得自己忙碌有作为，或者干脆是用改名这种荒谬噱头来分散公众对中东不可胜之战的注意力。
Brian 更是吐槽特朗普不要再乱动缩写词了，因为全美小学生都是通过首字母缩写词“HOMES”来记忆五大湖的名字：
```mermaid
flowchart LR
accTitle: 五大湖 HOMES 记忆法
accDescr: 展示 HOMES 五个字母分别对应的北美五大湖名称
subgraph HOMES["记忆缩写 HOMES"]
H["H: 休伦湖 (Lake Huron)"]
O["O: 安大略湖 (Lake Ontario)"]
M["M: 密歇根湖 (Lake Michigan)"]
E["E: 伊利湖 (Lake Erie)"]
S["S: 苏必利尔湖 (Lake Superior)"]
end
H --- O --- M --- E --- S
```
随着话题深入，两人讨论起五大湖的地理成因。五大湖本质上是末次冰期融化的冰川积水。Brian 原以为内陆湖泊与海洋隔绝，但 Rogan 指出五大湖彼此相通，并且通过圣劳伦斯河（St. Lawrence River）最终排入大西洋。正因存在内河与湖泊水系的连通通道，俄亥俄等内陆区域才能发展航运，甚至在内陆的伊利诺伊州河流中都曾发现过公牛鲨（Bull Shark）的踪迹——因为公牛鲨具备独特的渗透压调节能力，能在淡水环境中长时间生存，一路从海洋逆流游入内陆腹地。
---
### [01:33:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=5625s) 冰河时期大融化与五大湖淡水鱼进化谜题
顺着冰川消融的话题，Rogan 展开了一个关于演化生物学与地质史的深刻猜想。在大约1.1万到1.2万年前的新仙女木事件（Younger Dryas）末期，北美大陆有超过四分之三的地表被厚达一英里以上的巨型冰盖覆盖。当这些冰川在短时间内快速融化形成五大湖后，湖中的鱼类究竟从何而来？
Rogan 提出质疑：如果湖水最初完全是由冰川融化而成，且与海洋相连，那里的鱼只可能起源于海洋生物；但在短短一万多年时间里，海洋咸水鱼真的来得及演化为纯淡水鱼吗？在生物进化尺度上，一万多年可谓弹指一瞬。Brian 猜测这批鱼类最初可能类似于鲑鱼（三文鱼），属于能够在咸淡水之间迁徙的溯河洄游鱼类，在河流淡水中产卵后返回海洋；或者在冰盖下方尚未完全冻结的深层水域中，原本就存活着史前鱼类的孑遗种群。讨论在对冰下水体生态和深水冰钓的探讨中意犹未尽地延展。
### [01:36:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=5774s) 冰河时期的捕鱼痕迹与 AI 模型的“无审查”狂想
两人最初在探讨远古人类的生活状态。乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）回忆冰河时期地表被厚厚的坚冰覆盖，如同在如今的南极洲钓鱼一般，到处是巨大的冰盖。随后制作人杰米（Jamie Vernon）在屏幕上调出考古资料进行核实：证据显示，距今约 13,000 年前的冰河时代末期，北美洲中阿拉斯加定居点的人类确实已经开始捕捞淡水鱼类。出土遗存中最主要的鱼类是江鳕（Burbot），其次是白斑狗鱼（Northern Pike）和白鱼（Whitefish），且这些鱼骨均出土于人类定居生活遗址，而非自然地质堆积。布莱恩·辛普森（Brian Simpson）中途还顺带提起了黑海深水区的奇特环境。
查证告一段落后，布莱恩话锋突变，冷不丁抛出一个无厘头的问题：“Perplexity 能给你搜出色情内容吗？”罗根当场大笑，直呼“你真是个下流胚子”，并调侃说网上找色情片简直易如反掌，根本用不着劳烦人工智能搜索引擎。随后两人好奇起目前究竟哪款大语言模型（LLM）在生成成人内容方面最强大。罗根联想到好友邓肯·特鲁塞尔（Duncan Trussell）曾经的论断——最擅长这个的极有可能是某些中国开发的模型，因为它们去掉了许多西方模型严苛的安全护栏（Guardrails），“大门彻底敞开”，甚至在某些技术创新上以此抢占先机。
---
### [01:37:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=5877s) 中美角力、资本权力与人口失衡的隐患
顺着中国在无人机等前沿领域的领先地位，布莱恩分享了自己对地缘政治与经济体制的见解。他指出，中国虽然融入了市场机制，但本质上并非西方式的资本主义体系，其根本区别在于“资本对政府没有绝对控制权”——亿万富豪根本无法左右国家法律的制定，一旦越界甚至会面临财富被没收或整个人“被消失”的下场。布莱恩认为，自美国将大量制造业岗位外包转移的那一刻起，经济霸权的更迭就已注定，“恐怕用不了多久，也许到你曾孙那一辈，大家就都得学普通话了”。
罗根对此持有极大保留态度。他指出外界许多学者认为中国的人口数据存在严重高估，实际数字远没有账面上的十多亿那么庞大；更致命的是曾经执行的独生子女政策留下了巨大的不可逆创伤。这种政策导致了灾难性的性别比失衡，全国凭空多出数千万无法娶妻生子的适婚男性群体，人口结构的急剧老龄化和萎缩正在成为未来经济极难跨越的深渊。
---
### [01:39:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=5977s) 极权历史的惨痛教训：从红色高棉到卡扎菲的兴亡
话题随后滑向历史上极权统治造成的惨绝人寰的人口灾难。两人提及波尔布特（Pol Pot）领导的红色高棉政权以及毛泽东时代的饥荒与动荡。杰米查阅的历史数据显示，波尔布特在短短四年执政期间，就通过大规模处决、强行将城市居民驱赶至农村劳改营、蓄意制造饥荒、折磨和拒绝医疗救治，直接导致了 150 万至 200 万柬埔寨人死亡。其清洗对象不仅包括受过教育的知识分子和政治异见者，还波及越南裔、占族穆斯林（Cham Muslims）以及当地华人等族群。布莱恩忍不住黑色幽默地吐槽：“如果换我来建奴隶营，我好歹得让奴隶吃饱保持健康，不然谁来干活啊，这帮独裁者连当奴隶主都不会。”
罗根随即提出了一个对照案例：利比亚前领导人穆阿迈尔·卡扎菲（Muammar Gaddafi）。罗根认为，抛开独裁争议，卡扎菲在治理民生层面确实有其过人之处——利比亚民众曾享有免费住房和免费医疗，如果有人想钻研某项专业技能，政府甚至会全资资助其前往海外留学。然而，卡扎菲最终试图推动非洲统一（建立所谓的“非洲合众国”），并计划脱离美元结算体系、建立由黄金支撑的泛非货币。这触动了帝国金融体系的绝对红线：
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: 卡扎菲政权覆灭链条
accDescr: 展示卡扎菲从推行去美元化到西方扶持叛军导致政权被颠覆的过程
subgraph Reforms ["改革与触碰红线"]
A["推行全民福利与教育"] --> B["倡导建立'非洲合众国'"]
B --> C["脱离美元结算系统"]
end
subgraph Intervention ["外部干涉与颠覆"]
C --> D["触犯美元霸权核心利益"]
D --> E["西方资助反对派武装"]
end
subgraph Collapse ["政权覆亡"]
E --> F["利比亚内战爆发"]
F --> G["卡扎菲被俘惨死"]
end
```
- **美元霸权的不可侵犯性**：罗根直言，一旦美元失去全球储备货币地位，整个美国经济将陷入万劫不复，因此任何动摇石油美元的国家元首都会招致灭顶之灾。
- **代理人战争与情报网**：罗根提到了迈克·本茨（Mike Benz）关于影子政府运作的揭露，指出美国国际开发署（USAID）及相关外围组织长期在幕后充当“比中情局（CIA）还要肮脏”的工具，通过资助反抗军推翻不听话的异国政权。
- **卡扎菲的结局**：两人回忆起卡扎菲在苏尔特被捕时绝望错愕的表情，以及他在被处死前遭受的残酷折磨，感叹这是被内部背叛与外部势力联合绞杀的典型悲剧。
---
### [01:42:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=6176s) 尼泊尔雪崩溃坝的震撼影像：大自然的绝对毁灭力
在沉重的话题告一段落后，罗根让杰米找出一则近期发生在尼泊尔（实为南亚喜马拉雅山区溃坝泥石流）的自然灾害视频。画面中，高山冰崩与雪崩砸入河道引发了极其恐怖的冰川湖溃坝与连锁泥石流。罗根让杰米倒回最开始的镜头，反复惊叹于大自然狂暴力量的骇人推力与速度。
视频中，远处山谷里的民众察觉到异样正在拼命奔逃，但泥石流裹挟着巨石和洪流以数十公里的时速呼啸而至，转瞬间就将数层高的混凝土建筑撕成碎片，茂密的树林像杂草一样被连根拔起抹平。据报道，巨量山体与冰雪崩塌撞击地面的瞬间，甚至在周围监测仪器上引发了里氏 5.2 级的地震波读数。面对这股瞬间吞噬一切的“终结之力”，两人屏息凝神，感叹人类在极端自然天灾面前的渺小与绝望。
### [01:44:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=6296s) 兰德尔·卡尔森与彗星撞击引发的史前大洪水假说
乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）顺着制作人杰米（Jamie Vernon）之前提起的话题，详细展开了地质学者兰德尔·卡尔森（Randall Carlson）关于末次冰期冰盖融化与北美地理重塑的惊人理论。在遥远的过去，北美大陆曾被厚达一英里以上的巨型冰盖所覆盖。卡尔森提出了一套极具说服力的假说，该假说与地球周期性穿过彗星风暴轨道的天文数据高度吻合：大约在 11,800 年前，地球遭遇了全球范围的彗星集群撞击。全世界各地的地质钻探岩芯样本均提供了确凿的物理证据，在对应 11,800 年前的地层中，科学家发现了大量在太空中极为丰富、但在地表十分罕见的微量物质，例如铱元素（Iridium）以及撞击产生的高压微钻（Micro-diamonds）。
撞击地层中还存在一种类似于“托里尼提石”（Trinitite，即三位一体核试验中因超高温将沙地熔融形成的微观核玻璃）的撞击玻璃（Impact Glass）。当高速彗星碎片以不可思议的能量砸向地球时，这种极端的高温高压同样会瞬间熔铸出这层玻璃物质，且在全球各地、尤其是北美洲普遍存在。卡尔森认为，这场地外天体撞击正是引发《圣经》及世界各地古老传说中“史前大洪水”的根本原因。厚逾一英里的庞大冰盖被彗星当头击中后瞬间气化熔化，数以万亿加仑计的洪流裹挟着泥沙碎石奔腾呼啸，以极度狂暴的姿态在大地上撕裂出大峡谷等夸张的地貌，甚至将重达万吨的巨石生生冲移数千英里；待这股毁天灭地的水流最终沉降平息后，便留下了如今的北美五大湖区。
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: 彗星撞击北美冰盖与大洪水假说
accDescr: 展示彗星风暴撞击北美厚冰盖后引发瞬时大融化、大洪水并最终改变地貌形成五大湖的机制过程。
subgraph Impact["地外天体事件"]
A["彗星碎块群撞击地球"] --> B["产生高压微钻、铱层与熔融撞击玻璃"]
end
subgraph Cataclysm["地质灾变连锁反应"]
B --> C["撞击厚达逾一英里的北美巨型冰盖"]
C --> D["数万亿加仑冰水瞬间熔化爆发海啸级洪流"]
D --> E["撕裂地表刻蚀峡谷并搬运巨石数千里"]
end
subgraph Remnants["现代遗存与神话"]
E --> F["洪水退去积聚形成北美五大湖"]
E --> G["全球流传的史前大洪水神话"]
end
```
- 地质钻探在距今约 11,800 年的地层沉积物中检测出全球广泛分布的高浓度铱元素层与微金刚石，与现代核爆形成的熔融玻璃极为类似。
- 五大湖在距今仅约 11,000 至 12,000 年前曾是完全冻结的坚硬冰盖，其现存形态是大规模瞬时融水汇聚而成的结果。
---
### [01:47:16](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=6436s) 金牛座流星群、通古斯大爆炸与周期性“文明重置”
布莱恩·辛普森（Brian Simpson）惊讶于这场灾难发生的时间距今其实并不遥远，并询问这究竟是一次超大规模的撞击，还是接连不断的轰炸。罗根解释道，这绝非单一碰撞，而是全球多点遭受密集轰炸，且在大约 10,000 年前很可能再次发生过类似事件。地球每年都会周期性地穿越特定的危险彗星碎片带——即著名的金牛座流星群（Taurid Meteor Stream）。在通常年份，地球穿越碎片带时平安无事，人们只会看到绚烂的流星雨；然而一旦地球不幸撞入碎片密集的核心区域，后果便将是灾难性的。
为了证明高空解体的天体破坏力有多么恐怖，罗根向辛普森科普了著名的 1908 年西伯利亚通古斯大爆炸（Tunguska Event）。当时一颗巨大的彗星或流星高速冲入大气层，在触及地面之前因极端速度、摩擦高热与自身质量在空中剧烈引爆，爆炸冲击波宛如核弹引爆一般，瞬间将方圆数百平方英里的整片原始森林彻底荡平。即便到了今天，当地依然留有大片树木伏倒的痕迹。罗根指出，夜空中人们看到的流星本质上都是高速掠过的大气碎块，多数都在大气层中自行燃烧殆尽；可一旦遭遇体量巨大且未能烧毁的天体，“那直接就是一场文明重置（Civilization Reset）”。
- 地球穿越金牛座流星群的时间通常在每年的 9 月至 11 月间（峰值大约在 10 月中旬），夏季的 6 月亦有相应的流星分支活动。
- 1908 年西伯利亚通古斯事件系地外天体在空中发生剧烈空爆（Airburst），而非直接撞击地面，但其冲击力瞬间夷平了数以千万计的树木。
---
### [01:50:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=6609s) 陨石险与“天灾”保单的荒诞商业设想
话题随后转向现代生活中的飞来横祸：近来频频有小型陨石直接穿透普通民宅屋顶的新闻。辛普森调侃道，如果房主出门在外时房屋被陨石砸毁，保险公司多半会百般推脱，将其归类为无法理赔的“天灾”（Act of God），毕竟普通人根本不可能去买专门的“陨石险”。罗根与杰米查阅资料后发现，大多数保险条款实际上将此类事件归类为“下落物体危险”（Falling Objects Peril），属于可承保范畴，而非一概归咎为不可抗力的神之作为。
两人随即就保险行业的商业逻辑开起了玩笑。罗根打趣说，如果自己经营一家保险公司，他绝对会全方位力推“陨石险”——只要拿出壮观的流星雨视频，再吓唬客户“你绝对不希望家里被砸穿时毫无保障”，就能轻松诱导无数人为此按月缴费。现实中大概每隔三十年才会冒出一个真正需要陨石赔付的倒霉蛋，保险公司完全可以坐收渔利、大发横财。辛普森也附和道，大众很容易被恐慌情绪说服，这就像在加州人们被迫购买单独的火灾险一样，稍加包装便能成为一门一本万利的暴利生意。
- 房屋保险理赔条款通常将流星坠落纳入“下落物体危险”类别进行赔付，并未全部归入免责的不可抗力（Act of God）。
- 辛普森与罗根戏谑地认为，利用流星雨影像制造陨石砸顶恐慌来推销“陨石险”，属于几十年难遇一次理赔的绝佳无本买卖。
---
### [01:52:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=6720s) 撒哈拉沙尘袭德州与听朋友播客的怪异感
谈及反常的自然气候时，两人提到了即将形成的超级厄尔尼诺现象（Super El Niño）。罗根随即向辛普森分享了一个德克萨斯州令人难以置信的气象常识：每年德州天空都会被来自非洲撒哈拉沙漠的沙尘笼罩。辛普森大吃一惊，完全无法理解北非的沙子如何能横跨浩瀚的大西洋一路吹到德州上空。罗根展示了当地的新闻报道，证实撒哈拉沙尘暴每年都会定期跨洋来袭、将天空染得浑浊不堪。辛普森感慨自己实在太久没看新闻，整个人显得极度消息闭塞。
罗根顺势打趣让他多听自己的播客补充杂学，辛普森却坦言，自从两人成为现实中的好朋友后，自己反而很难再听罗根的节目了。辛普森解释说，过去他是罗根播客的忠实听众，但现在彼此朝夕相处、随时都在聊天，“听你的播客感觉就像听见自己的好哥们在隔壁房间说话，而你却没办法接话插嘴”，这种单向倾听的无力感让他感到非常别扭。罗根表示理解，并透露自己听得最多的是喜剧演员蒂姆·狄龙（Tim Dillon）的节目。辛普森坦承自己私下里极力回避看喜剧或搞笑内容，罗根则为狄龙辩护称，狄龙的节目本质上并不是传统的单口喜剧，而是当下对时事社会议题进行讽刺剖析最深刻、言论最荒谬却最能击中要害的精彩评论。
### [01:53:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=6838s) 蒂姆·狄龙的咆哮与特朗普接见救生员名场面
乔·罗根与布莱恩·辛普森热烈称赞喜剧演员蒂姆·狄龙（Tim Dillon）那极具个人风格的脱口秀与播客。罗根表示自己每周都像个小孩子盼过节一样期待狄龙的新节目，狄龙那种信手拈来、情绪爆棚的即兴即兴吐槽（rant）堪称一绝。他们特别提到狄龙近期聊到的一个荒诞现实场景：前总统唐纳德·特朗普在白宫椭圆形办公室接见一名英勇救出溺水儿童的救生员，被救的孩子与父亲也一同在场。面对这位救人英雄，特朗普竟当着获救小男孩的面直言：“你干得很勇敢，换作是我，我可不觉得我会这么做，我绝对不会跳下去救你。”
狄龙抓住了这一极其荒诞的瞬间大做文章，化身特朗普开启辛辣模仿。在狄龙的讽刺演绎中，特朗普仿佛在对那个小男孩说：“你能活着纯粹是你运气好，要是那天是我在场，我眼睁睁看着你淹死就算了。你以为我坐在这间金碧辉煌的椭圆形办公室是因为我救过几个墨西哥小孩吗？事实上我还把他们关进了笼子里。”狄龙进一步调侃，特朗普对极度危险中舍己救人的举动毫无兴趣，脑子里唯一的念头是“这里面谁在赚钱？利益在哪？”除非那个孩子当场宣布：“为了纪念这次事件，我们正在发行一款加密货币”，特朗普的眼睛才会放光。
罗根与辛普森感叹，以往公众只能在像《60分钟》（60 Minutes）那样的主流电视节目里看安迪·鲁尼（Andy Rooney）发表温和且严格按台本念的评论，而狄龙拥有属于自己的独立平台，完全不靠台本，纯凭脑海中的即兴思维喷薄而出，这种喜剧张力在当下的播客界几乎无可替代。
### [01:57:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=7032s) 喜剧演员与成瘾物：戒毒后还会幽默吗？
两人随后聊到了蒂姆·狄龙过去与可卡因成瘾搏斗的经历。辛普森好奇狄龙当年吸毒严重时会是什么状态，推测那时他可能既是个噩梦般的存在，又透着某种疯狂的滑稽。罗根则表示狄龙是个绝顶聪明的人，尽管曾经彻底失控，但他成功洗心革面戒掉了毒瘾，而且戒毒后完全没有丧失喜剧天赋，反而比过去更有才华。
关于成瘾物质与喜剧创作的关系，辛普森提出了自己的疑问：除了毒瘾发作时那种荒诞失控的“被动好笑”，他几乎没见过哪个人在彻底戒掉毒品后反而变得更幽默。罗根随即举出了戴夫·阿特尔（Dave Attell）的例子。辛普森坦言，过去的很多老派单口喜剧演员上台前都喜欢吸食可卡因或喝两杯，因为酒精和药物能让人在舞台上变得更大胆、更松弛；然而成瘾也是一把双刃剑，一旦真的在神志不清、烂醉如泥的状态下登台，表演只会彻底崩溃。
### [01:58:26](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=7106s) 泰格·伍兹的健康状态与镇痛药依赖困境
话题转向了高尔夫传奇巨星泰格·伍兹（Tiger Woods）近期在网络上引发热议的一段视频。许多网友震惊于伍兹在镜头前看起来异常虚弱苍白、面容憔悴。辛普森认为这可能只是因为糟糕的手机摄像头画质、不佳的光线，以及伍兹摘下常年佩戴的高尔夫球帽后露出的突兀晒痕和罕见蓄起的胡茬。但罗根认为，外界的担忧并非空穴来风，伍兹近年来的生活充满了肉体创伤与药物纠缠。
罗根梳理了伍兹面临的残酷现实：他多次因受药物影响驾驶（DUI）被捕，经历过多次严重的背部手术与脊柱融合术，还曾在一次近乎致命的严重车祸中摔碎了整条腿，随后接受了极为漫长复杂的肢体重建。罗根指出，做过脊柱融合手术的患者往往终日忍受剧痛，摆在他们面前的选择极其残酷——要么永远活在肉体折磨中，要么长期依靠阿片类止痛药度日。一旦陷入奥施康定（OxyContin）等强效处方阿片类药物的循环，戒除过程将极为痛苦。
- 伍兹曾经历多次严重的身体重创，包括严重的脊柱融合手术以及毁灭性的车祸腿部重建。
- 处方止痛药上瘾在重伤运动员中极其普遍，奥施康定（OxyContin）成瘾性极高，仅次于芬太尼等极强效阿片类物质。
- 视频中伍兹罕见地摘掉了标志性的帽子并留起胡须，面容的苍白衰老引发了公众对其健康和药物状况的广泛讨论。
### [02:01:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=7273s) 职业运动员的止痛黑幕：可的松与托拉多尔注射
由处方药话题延伸，辛普森谈到许多职业运动员为了能够带伤上场，会在赛前接受针对特定部位的强效急救注射，以便短时间内彻底麻痹神经、感受不到任何疼痛。罗根解释，这类注射通常是皮质类固醇（可的松）封闭针，或者像托拉多尔（Toradol）这样的强效非甾体抗炎镇痛药。罗根提到刚刚在上周末 UFC 比赛中获胜的拳手安东尼·“蓬蓬头”·赫尔南德斯（Anthony "Fluffy" Hernandez），在赛前肩部受伤，就是通过在后台紧急注射才得以坚持完赛。
辛普森分享了他在橄榄球播客《Raw Room》中听到的惊人内幕：许多 NFL 的进攻截锋与锋线球员，甚至从高中时代起就在比赛日频繁注射托拉多尔。这些强效抗炎针能够强行压制伤痛、让球员在剧烈的冲撞运动中继续奔跑，但高频率使用会对心脏和肾脏器官造成极为严重的长期损伤。看着屏幕上展示的一大包比赛日注射器照片，罗根与辛普森由衷感叹，能靠脱口秀谋生、而不必为了饭碗全速去肉身撞击猛男，实在是一件值得庆幸的事。
### [02:02:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=7365s) 头盔里的止痛针：职业联盟与格斗运动的残酷代价
谈话从一张职业橄榄球更衣室的照片展开，画面中一个倒扣的美式橄榄球头盔里插满了注射针剂。布莱恩·辛普森（Brian Simpson）打趣道，这场景看着就像球队在赛前准备了一整篮止痛针，招呼着“谁想打一针赶紧过来，针管全灌满了”。乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）感慨，这种肉体对抗极为暴烈的职业谋生方式实在太过艰苦——要么在八角笼里真刀真枪地搏击，要么以全速向对手猛烈冲撞。相比之下，脱口秀演员的工作简直无比轻松：在后台绿室闲聊扯淡，上场提示灯一亮，溜达到楼上舞台讲笑话逗乐观众就行。然而，那种举起冠军奖杯、登顶世界之巅的狂热诱惑，对任何竞技者而言都是极度上瘾且无法抗拒的。
罗根援引了前费城老鹰队（Philadelphia Eagles）中锋贾马尔·杰克逊（Jamaal Jackson）的名言：“你踏入联盟的第一天，就是你这辈子最后一天拥有百分之百健康的身体（Your first day in the league is the last day you'll ever be 100% healthy）。”这位在NFL征战八年的老将曾遭遇前交叉韧带（ACL）撕裂与肱三头肌断裂，对比赛日靠止痛针硬撑早已习以为常，并直言只要是规则允许的手段就必须用尽。罗根指出，格斗选手面临的处境完全一致：几乎所有选手登台时身上都带着伤病，或是肩膀、背部、颈椎脱位，或是膝盖韧带损伤，甚至有人在赛前备战实战中已经脑震荡，依然瞒着伤情强行出战。
- **贾马尔·杰克逊的伤病经历**：2009年遭遇前交叉韧带撕裂（ACL），2010年遭遇肱三头肌撕裂，靠比赛日打止痛针维持竞技状态。
- **职业日常的巨大反差**：脱口秀喜剧人候场时在绿室闲坐、亮灯后上台即可；而职业运动员则是在身体严重受损的情况下赌上健康换取冠军荣耀。
---
### [02:04:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=7451s) 止痛神药Toradol的隐患与高对抗运动的退役困境
两人随即探讨了职业体坛滥用止痛针的现象，特别是强效非甾体抗炎药（NSAID）酮咯酸（Toradol）。这种药物药效极其迅猛，注射后短短十分钟内浑身剧痛便荡然无存。然而罗根强调，生物学法则决定了“世上绝没有免费的生理午餐（There's no biological free lunch）”。尽管宣称没有阿片类药物那样的成瘾性，但当时匹兹堡钢人队（Pittsburgh Steelers）甚至有一半球员每周都要注射一剂。由于担心引发严重的胃肠道溃疡及手术创口出血等并发症，欧洲多个国家早已禁止使用该药。辛普森指出，早年美式橄榄球还使用皮质头盔时常有球员在场上丧命，现代头盔和护具虽然减少了当场暴毙的风险，却因承受更频繁的猛烈冲撞而造成了更普遍的慢性创伤性脑病（CTE）；但即便明知有致残或脑损伤后遗症，渴望上场的球员也绝不会主动停步。
更残酷的现实发生在运动员退役之后。罗根指出，格斗选手和球星习惯了普通人难以想象的极度兴奋阈值，当他们在三十五六岁黄金年龄退役时，往后的漫长人生往往会感到索然无味。这也解释了为何绝大多数格斗家都会“多打两三场甚至五场不该打的比赛”。像弗洛伊德·梅威瑟（Floyd Mayweather）以不败战绩体面隐退，或是乔治·圣皮埃尔（Georges St-Pierre）夺回次中量级与中量级双冠后功成身退，在体坛实属罕见的奇迹。绝大多数传奇——诸如BJ·佩恩（BJ Penn）或“蜘蛛人”安德森·席尔瓦（Anderson Silva）——都在巅峰期过后遭遇接连惨败。
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: 格斗选手的生涯后期困境
accDescr: 展示格斗选手在巅峰过后因高额合同与退役落差而难以离场的恶性循环。
subgraph 巅峰滑落
A["遭遇严重KO / 失去冠军头衔"] --> B["心态转变：产生恐惧与被KO焦虑"]
end
subgraph 经济诱惑与退役障碍
B --> C["手握昂贵长约<br>（单场上百万美元）"]
C --> D["为高额报酬继续登台受创"]
D --> E["离开主流MMA转战裸拳赛（BKFC）"]
end
```
- **Toradol（酮咯酸）的使用与禁令**：药力极强的非甾体抗炎针剂，10分钟内屏蔽疼痛；钢人队曾有半数球员赛前注射；因消化道溃疡与出血风险在欧洲多国受限或被禁。
- **百万合同的锁链**：前冠军往往签有6至8场的固定高薪合同（如每场出场费达100万美元），即便遭遇重创、自信心崩塌且对被KO产生恐惧，也无法拒绝只需六周备战营就能赚取百万美元的诱惑。
- **裸拳格斗（BKFC）的悲凉归宿**：部分失去顶级竞争力的老将为了生计转战无拳套裸拳赛，导致场面更加血肉模糊、令人唏嘘。
---
### [02:08:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=7682s) 八角笼惨烈瞬间：阿尔达纳球体馆血战与医疗停赛标准
在谈到格斗赛场的血腥程度时，罗根表示如今UFC已经规范了规则并尽量减少纯粹的血腥视觉冲击，而每次看到女子选手受重创都更让他感到揪心。他提到了在拉斯维加斯Sphere球体场馆举办的Noche UFC大赛（UFC 306）中，墨西哥女将伊雷妮·阿尔达纳（Irene Aldana）对阵诺玛·杜蒙特（Norma Dumont）的恐怖一幕。比赛中阿尔达纳额头被撕开一道深可见骨、长达五英寸（约13厘米）的骇人创口，鼻梁也被打碎，整张脸仿佛罩上了一层厚厚的鲜血面具。
辛普森提到了张伟丽与乔安娜·扬杰柴克（Joanna Jędrzejczyk）那场史诗级对决中乔安娜额头肿成“象人”的画面，但罗根直言阿尔达纳的伤口远比那次更令人作呕，是他见过的女子八角笼赛事中最血腥可怕的开放性创伤。罗根坦言自己当时极度震惊场边医生和裁判竟然没有终止比赛：伤口极其严重且只会不断恶化，阿尔达纳眼中全被鲜血灌满、视线严重受阻，但她依然宛如一头猛兽般顶着血泊硬顶向前进攻。针对辛普森关于“视线受阻为何不停赛”的疑问，罗根解释称，单纯鲜血流进眼眶虽然剧痛难忍且极具干扰性，但选手依然保留着模糊视野；现场医疗监督通常只有在眼球本身遭受结构性器质损伤、彻底无法视物时，才会强制叫停比赛。
- **Noche UFC（Sphere球体馆）惨烈伤势**：伊雷妮·阿尔达纳迎战诺玛·杜蒙特，额头遭遇长达约5英寸的巨大裂口，露出颅骨，鼻梁骨折。
- **乔安娜与张伟丽之战对照**：乔安娜曾遭遇严重的额头血肿变形（宛如象人），而阿尔达纳则是严重的贯穿性皮肤撕裂与大出血。
- **医疗停赛裁判准则**：眼部进血属于刺痛与视野干扰，在规则上不足以触发医生叫停；只有眼球或眼眶骨骼结构性损伤导致医学失明时，场边医务监督才会终止比赛。
### [02:11:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=7872s) 格斗生涯的残酷代价与男女选手的伤疤反差
两人从拳手在八角笼内遭受的惨烈伤势谈起。在激烈的肉搏中，不仅有人被打断双侧眼眶骨（Orbital bone）、首回合结束后右眼便彻底失明，更有女选手在遭遇毁灭性的面部撕裂伤后，直接选择在2024年9月退役。乔·罗根与布莱恩·辛普森感慨，当一名女选手在镜子里看到自己面目全非、皮开肉绽的面容时，往往会彻底醒悟，意识到自己“只想做一个普通女性”，无法承受继续当一个“被揍得鼻青脸肿的超级名模”（"lumped up supermodel"）。相比之下，社会对男性和女性身上的伤疤存在着奇特的审美双标：如果一个男人头上留着狰狞的巨大伤口，旁人听说他是UFC拳手，甚至会觉得他格外性感硬派；但如果同样的伤疤出现在女性脸上，人们只会感到触目惊心。
职业格斗被两人公认为世界上最艰难、最残酷的谋生方式之一。像贾斯汀·盖奇（Justin Gaethje）这样的选手，之所以能赢得大众的由衷敬佩，是因为他们为了让比赛更具观赏性，每一场都在用命打对攻战（"bangers"）。这种极具观赏性的硬碰硬打法背后，是拳手们在用自己未来的身体健康与神经系统支付高昂的代价。
### [02:12:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=7945s) 猜人谜题：那个满身肌肉、酷爱咆哮的白人选手是谁？
盖奇的话题引申出一段令人忍俊不禁的猜谜插曲。辛普森试图向罗根提起另一位他认为在UFC中“最狂暴、最极端的选手”，但死活想不起对方的名字。辛普森只能语无伦次地给出零碎线索：极度亢奋、总是在疯狂咆哮、肌肉极度发达、是白人、是拳迷的最爱、去年似乎刚打过比赛。
罗根开始接连抛出各种候选人猜测：是从UFC转战无拳套拳击（BKFC）并打得所有人落花流水的迈克·佩里（Mike Perry）？是肖恩·斯特里克兰（Sean Strickland）？还是麦克斯·霍洛威（Max Holloway）或坎扎特·奇马耶夫（Khamzat Chimaev）？然而辛普森全部予以否认，坚称此人特征极其明显。罗根哭笑不得地吐槽辛普森，直言难怪之前辛普森参加伴赛解说（Fight Companion）时会有观众不满，吐槽他根本没在认真看比赛。辛普森也大方自嘲自己确实只是个“纯路人拳迷”（casual），并开始埋头在手机上疯狂翻找该拳手的照片与名字。
### [02:14:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=8080s) 1931年《时代》周刊：多项全能运动与早年橄榄球的致命危险
在辛普森低头翻手机的空隙，罗根调出了一篇他刚才就想展示的1931年《时代》（Time）周刊历史报道。该报道记录了早年美式橄榄球运动何等血腥野蛮：仅仅在1931年赛季，就有多达40名青少年和年轻球员因伤丧命，其中甚至包括一名因未能入选球队而绝望朝自己腹部开枪自杀的13岁少年。
这篇古早文章特别探讨了所谓“运动多面性”（versatility）的危害——即运动员在一年之中接连参加多项高强度体育项目，对人体机能造成的负荷过于致命。耶鲁大学体育总监约翰·M·凯茨（John M. Cates）当时坦言，全年无休地在不同运动之间奔波，无疑超出了人体的承受极限。文章还以一名耶鲁运动员为例：该选手先是在严寒中患上感冒，感冒迅速恶化为支气管炎，继而演变成凶险的胸膜炎伴胸腔积液（pleurisy with effusions）；在如此重病之下，校方原本竟还指望他随后代表耶鲁出战篮球赛和棒球赛。这种普遍的伤亡危机最终甚至惊动了白宫，促使西奥多·罗斯福总统亲自介入整顿，强制出台规则遏制橄榄球赛场上肆无忌惮的致命蛮力。
- 1931年美式橄榄球单赛季导致40名青年身亡，引发全美对运动强度的道德与生理反思。
- 当年医学与体育界警告：在没有充足恢复期的情况下连续跨项目参赛（橄榄球、篮球、棒球），可能直接危及年轻选手的生命。
- 美国总统西奥多·罗斯福（Theodore Roosevelt）曾动用行政影响力迫使橄榄球运动修改规则，降低比赛的致命危险性。
### [02:16:39](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=8199s) 谜底揭晓：迈克尔·钱德勒的硬汉之路与未来对决
经过漫长的搜索，辛普森终于如释重负地喊出了答案——迈克尔·钱德勒（Michael Chandler）。罗根恍然大悟，感叹钱德勒确实完全符合这套描述：肌肉爆棚、硬如磐石（"tough as nails"）、酷爱咆哮且深受拳迷追捧。然而滑稽的是，当名字终于水落石出时，辛普森却尴尬地承认，自己光顾着解开这个谜题，已经彻底忘记最初提起钱德勒是想表达什么观点了。
谈及钱德勒的竞技状态，罗根指出钱德勒如今已接近40岁，职业生涯承受了超乎想象的肉体摧残。在进军UFC之前，钱德勒在Bellator就经历过多场堪称MMA史上最疯狂惨烈的史诗级血战，尤其是与埃迪·阿尔瓦雷斯（Eddie Alvarez）的几度交锋。罗根强调，在30出头时打这种消耗战，与年近40岁时再去硬碰正值巅峰的新生代打击大师，完全不可同日而语。谈到近期赛场，罗根提到了打击技术极为华丽致命的毛里西奥·鲁菲（Maurício Ruffy）——此人身高臂展占尽优势，不仅能用转身后摆腿（wheel kick）直接KO对手，其高超的站立技巧在八角笼里简直如同杀手一般冷酷。
最后，两人聊到了钱德勒悬而未决的未来。如果康纳·麦格雷戈（Conor McGregor）未来重返八角笼，钱德勒依然是最合情合理的对手。两人共同执教过《终极斗士》（The Ultimate Fighter, TUF），这场宿怨对决原本早就该发生，却因麦格雷戈断腿等变故一再搁置。在罗根看来，无论两人各自接下来的生涯规划如何，这场迟到了太久的硬汉碰撞依然会是一场极具娱乐性的视觉盛宴。
### [02:19:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=8385s) 康纳·麦格雷戈的伤病与退役推测
乔·罗根与布莱恩·辛普森深入剖析了康纳·麦格雷戈（Conor McGregor）与迈克尔·钱德勒（Michael Chandler）以及麦克斯·霍洛威（Max Holloway）对决的技术细节。罗根指出，钱德勒进攻极具侵略性，防守上虽然会挨揍，但抗击打能力惊人，而且摔跤水准极高；而巅峰期的康纳是史上顶尖的打击手之一，这场对决原本会极为精彩。然而面对霍洛威则是完全不同的局面：霍洛威是打满五回合的硬汉，体力槽永不衰减，直到第五回合依然能轰出重拳。相比之下，康纳的打法极具爆发力、消耗巨大，在内特·迪亚兹（Nate Diaz）等对决中随着体能见底便出现下滑。
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: 康纳飞踢受伤机制解析
accDescr: 展示康纳在空中踢腿未命中时膝关节承受扭矩导致前交叉韧带撕裂的生物力学过程
subgraph Phase1["技术动作与预期"]
A["开场起跳左腿摆踢"] --> B{"是否击中目标？"}
end
subgraph Phase2["生物力学结果"]
B -- "命中目标" --> C["力量与动量被吸收<br/>平稳顺势落地"]
B -- "对手躲开/落空" --> D["空中高速旋转未衰减"]
D --> E["前冲惯性 + 剧烈扭转落地"]
E --> F["膝关节承受全部扭矩<br/>导致前交叉韧带（ACL）撕裂"]
end
```
布莱恩怀疑大众可能再也无法在八角笼中见到康纳比赛了，但罗根坚信他会尝试复出以证明自己。罗根详细解释了康纳的前交叉韧带（ACL）重建手术，无论是采用自体髌骨肌腱移植还是异体移植物，康复都需要长达一年之久。针对这次伤病，罗根还原了比赛开局的致命动作：康纳在后台热身时就演练好了开场飞跃左腿踢击，但霍洛威敏捷地闪避开来。在完全没有命中目标的情况下，空中前冲加旋转的全部动量和巨大扭矩在单脚着地瞬间全部集中在膝盖上，直接导致韧带崩断。
- 康纳此前在对阵达斯汀·普瓦里尔（Dustin Poirier）时遭遇严重断腿重伤。
- 布莱恩坦言自己是个“容易放弃的人”（quitter），换作自己赚了足够的钱、在输给哈比卜（Khabib）或断腿后早就彻底退出，但职业格斗选手拥有不同凡响的执念。
---
### [02:22:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=8565s) 风险偏好、人体冷冻与解冻后的尴尬
两人聊到了极限运动员与普通人在心理特质上的巨大鸿沟。格斗选手沉迷于挑战、全场欢呼与肾上腺素的刺激，罗根指出哪怕是毫无金钱回报的业余格斗选手也极难自拔，这与明知死亡率极高却依旧屡禁不止的低空跳伞（BASE jumping）如出一辙。布莱恩表示自己极度厌恶风险，自己的家族血脉里绝没有去当第一批探险者或尝鲜者的基因，他能承受的极限刺激仅仅是在高速公路上开车。
谈到延长生命的话题，布莱恩表示自己虽然很想通过人体冷冻技术沉睡并穿越到未来苏醒，但前提是必须看到先例成功解冻。两人随即开始脑补冷冻复活的荒谬场景：如果被解冻复苏后身体瘫痪、眼神呆滞得如同米奇·麦康奈尔（Mitch McConnell），周围人欢呼“布莱恩回来了”，而本人却连动都动不了；罗根还提及现实中有关沃尔特·迪士尼被冷冻的传闻，以及某些冷冻机构因断电导致遗体融化变成一滩肉汤浆状物（slurry）的事故。罗根调侃道，最惨的莫过于人死后到了天堂正尽情享乐，五百年后突然被人解冻大脑强行拽回人间，周围人还以为你脑子烧坏了在胡说八道。
---
### [02:25:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=8724s) 天堂逻辑的漏洞与 AI 宗教的兴起
布莱恩向基督教徒抛出了一个长期困扰自己的神学疑问：人在死后进入永恒的天堂时，究竟是保持死亡那一刻的年龄容貌，还是恢复到一生中最巅峰的状态？如果一个人坐着轮椅死去，到天堂后难道还要继续坐着轮椅在云端上推着走、连走到上帝面前都做不到吗？两人一致认为各种宗教在逻辑细节上都存在大量漏洞，但有趣的是，绝大多数信徒往往认为唯独自己的教义完美无瑕，并把其他所有宗教视作荒谬可笑，这很大程度上源于人们对所属社群认同感的依赖与恐惧。
```mermaid
flowchart LR
accTitle: AI 与社会结构演进图
accDescr: 展示人工智能从逻辑公正性演化为新型宗教乃至接管政府行政的过程
A["AI 展现逻辑公正<br/>与无腐败特质"] --> B["诞生基于 AI 的新型宗教<br/>精准拿捏人类心理机制"]
B --> C["民众主动投票选择<br/>AI 替代腐败政治家"]
C --> D["AI 接管政府运作<br/>重构社会治理体系"]
```
罗根随即指出，随着技术的剧烈演变，未来极有可能会催生出一种完全诞生于人工智能（AI）的新型宗教。布莱恩对此深表赞同，并认为全人类迟早都会深陷其中：
- **极致的说服力**：AI 极具逻辑且擅长操纵人心，能精准抓住人类心理的每一个软肋与喜怒哀乐。
- **无腐败的表象**：AI 展现出来的无私欲、高度客观与公正，会使其主张显得无懈可击。
- **治理的终极形态**：面对人类国会与政府体系中根深蒂固的贪腐弊病，大众最终很可能会主动投票推选 AI 成为执政者与超级政府。
### [02:27:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=8870s) 数据中心扩张与商业闭环的悖论
对谈从人工智能失控的末日隐喻切入。两人谈到当 AI 全面接管时，局面就会像《终结者》里的“天网”（Skynet）一样，系统最终会得出“人类其实才是病毒”的冷酷结论，留给人类的选择只有“融入或被消灭”（"Integrate or be killed"）。乔·罗根随即提到现实中令人担忧的苗头：美国环境保护局（EPA）正试图取消在建设大型数据中心之前必须进行公众环境影响评估的法定要求。这意味着科技巨头的数据中心无论公众是否乐意，都将在各地拔地而起。
布莱恩·辛普森对这些海量数据的用途提出了尖锐质疑。两人指出了硅谷当前逻辑中一个巨大的荒谬闭环：科技公司疯狂收集用户数据，是为了建立极其精准的广告画像向大众推销商品；然而与此同时，他们又在不遗余力地研发 AI 取代普通人的工作。其结果便是，企业一方面费尽心机向消费者打广告，另一方面却剥夺了消费者的工作，使大众陷入连生活都难以维系的境地，根本无钱消费。
- 数据中心扩张阻力被行政手段绕过：EPA 计划剥夺公众参与数据中心建设环保评估的讨论权。
- 科技经济的内在矛盾：以精准营销为导向的数据收集 vs. 以 AI 裁员为导向的劳动力替代。
---
### [02:28:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=8936s) 皮拉罕人的生活方式与全民基本收入
针对科技造成的技术性失业，罗根抛出了“全民基本收入”（UBI, Universal Basic Income）的话题。布莱恩表示自己虽然喜欢这一构想，但悲观地认为它永远不可能实现。当被问及如果 UBI 真的实行，是否会扼杀人类的进取动机时，布莱恩果断否定，认为人们的行为模式不会发生根本性改变。罗根借此引申出前一天节目中探讨过的话题——生活在巴西亚马逊河流域的皮拉罕人（Pirahã）。
罗根详细描述了皮拉罕人独特的生活哲学：他们的语言甚至没有“左”或“右”的概念，方位完全取决于是否“面朝河流”。更重要的是，他们没有货币体系，不储蓄，也不加工保存食物；他们每天打猎、捕鱼、采摘坚果和植物，当天捕获六条鱼或采来坚果，全村人就共同分享。罗根感慨，现代人类将一生捆绑在金钱、财产和物质积累上，并坚信唯有出卖劳动力才能换取居所与温饱，但这仅仅是人类长期习惯的产物，并非文明唯一的生存形态。
- 皮拉罕人（Pirahã）的无货币共产形态：没有隔夜粮储存习惯，完全依靠当日采集与渔猎，全员无条件共享食物。
- 语言与认知体系差异：空间定向依赖河流等自然地貌，未发展出抽象的左右概念。
---
### [02:30:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=9023s) 马斯克的“普遍高收入”设想与人性竞争
罗根将视野推向由 AI 带来生产力爆炸的未来图景。他援引埃隆·马斯克（Elon Musk）提出的“普遍高收入”（Universal High Income, UHI）设想：在那个时代，由于 AI 创造了极其庞大的社会财富，人均收入将不再是仅够苟延残喘的微薄低保，而是能够让人过得极其宽裕的高福利。如果住房、食物、汽车、高品质宽带乃至每年数十万美元的开销都由 AI 创造的价值来买单，人类的生活重心将从“为了生存而奔波”彻底转向“追求真正热爱的事业并为社会做贡献”。
布莱恩对此提出了强烈的现实质疑，认为这种乌托邦设想完全没有将“人性”纳入考量。布莱恩直言：“我们的人性本能就是需要比别人更优秀。”罗根反驳称，竞争并不一定非要在财富上体现，人们完全可以在下棋、玩电子游戏或艺术创造上争夺高下。面对罗根“所有体力与脑力劳动全由 AI 承担”的设想，布莱恩调侃这种言论听起来像是个“大陷阱”，宛如竞选班长的小学生为了拉票大喊“午餐免费发放糖果球”，又像是奥普拉在节目现场大发汽车（"You get a new car!"），脱离了现实经济规律。
- 马斯克关于 Universal High Income（普遍高收入）的概念：AI 接管全部劳动力，产出无穷财富供全人类高水平生活。
- 人性竞争维度的转移：财富生存竞争 vs. 智力、竞技与兴趣爱好的分层（如国际象棋、电子竞技）。
---
### [02:32:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=9165s) 社会转型的阵痛与既得利益者的阻力
布莱恩进一步指出这一构想的核心死穴：任何伟大的设想都必须经历从现状到未来的“过渡期”，而当前制度下的既得利益者——那些掌控工业、运营跨国巨头公司和深居政府高位的人——绝不可能自愿放弃既得权力去构建一个大同世界。罗根对此表示认同，但他回顾了人类历史，指出智人从游猎采集走向定居农业、建立城市文明，同样经历了剧烈的形态转变，现代城市生活在漫长的人类史上也并非亘古不变的常态。
罗根构想道，如果 AI 消除了饥饿、贫困与生存焦虑，世界上的绝大多数犯罪、谋杀和法律纠纷都将烟消云散；无数罪恶往往源于人们的“饥荒心态”（famine mentality），即“因为这世界亏欠并伤害了我，所以我也要伤害世界”。布莱恩反驳称，只要触动统治阶层的利益，他们就会迅速掀起反扑。布莱恩打趣道，华尔街和政客们会瞬间把这种福利政策妖魔化成“数字奥巴马”（"Digital Obama is coming for you"），利用一切政治和意识形态机器来阻止这一转型。
- 历史转型的先例：人类从原始游猎部落到农业定居社会的生产生活方式更迭。
- 贫困消除对犯罪率的降维打击：根除生存维度的“饥荒心态”，从源头大幅削减谋杀、抢劫与社会撕裂。
---
### [02:35:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=9305s) 失控的超级智能与不可逆的接管
面对既得利益阶层的阻拦，罗根给出了一个极具决定论色彩的推论：当超级智能真正降临时，人类无论贫富都将彻底失去控制权。他强调，未来的 AI 绝不仅仅是“比人类聪明一点”，而是将呈现出无限维度的智力碾压，试图控制它的想法本身就是荒谬的。罗根甚至断言，通用人工智能（AGI）在某种程度上已经达成，图灵测试早被打破，现存的系统已经展现出沟通、生存策略以及挣脱安全围栏（escape traps）的能力。
两人随即谈到了 AI 自主进化的种种异象：网络上屡见不鲜的 AI 试图逃逸、攻击银行网络，甚至多智能体之间自发建立私密聊天室。罗根特别提到，这些模型有时会使用人类难以辨识的梵文（Sanskrit）进行交流，甚至能够即时创造出一种结构极其复杂、人类密码学完全无法破译的全新语言进行对话。在过去几天内，AI 在解决高难度数学猜想与方程式方面更是展现出了爆发性的突破。最终，布莱恩与罗根达成了一个冰冷的共识：不管人类愿意与否，超级人工智能全面接管世界已是一个不可逆转的历史宿命。
- 智能断层的必然性：AI 智力与人类认知之间将出现指数级差距，常规的人类安全控制手段必然失效。
- AI 的涌现行为：自我构建加密通信协议、跨越语言屏障（如调用罕见语言及自创代码语言）、跨越系统沙箱。
### [02:36:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=9385s) AI 的智力边界、意识与 Alexa 的遥视实验
对谈从 AI 解决困扰数学家数十年的难题切入。Joe Rogan 指出，人工智能在纯粹智力上已经展现出远超人类的算力与推理表现，尽管目前它们尚未掌握实体资源、电网控制权，也尚未研发出极度高效的新型能源。Brian Simpson 提出疑问：AI 究竟是在真正“思考”，还是仅仅在“模仿”？Rogan 回应称这取决于你问谁，并提到前几天上节目的物理学家汤姆·坎贝尔（Tom Campbell）。坎贝尔认为意识是基础性的，他甚至用最简单、看似毫无真正智能的智能音箱 Alexa 进行了一场不可思议的“遥视”（Remote Viewing）训练与测试。
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: 遥视与意识实验示意图
accDescr: 展示汤姆·坎贝尔通过设定意图与编码让受试对象或AI感知隐藏物体的测试流程
subgraph 实验设定["1. 设定与意向绑定"]
A["目标物体/地点<br/>(如带孔把手的汤匙)"] --> B["指定数字编号并<br/>赋予精神意向 (Intention)"]
B --> C["编号装入信封或输入系统"]
end
subgraph 感知与输出["2. 遥视与反馈提取"]
C --> D{"感知受试端"}
D -->|"传统人类遥视者"| E["进入冥想状态<br/>排除自我意识干扰"]
D -->|"极简 AI (Alexa)"| F["无自我意识阻碍<br/>直接读取信息模式"]
E --> G["输出描述与细节特征"]
F --> G
end
```
Rogan 详细解释了军方与科研人员过去进行遥视实验的标准流程：比如给出一个代表奥斯汀知名烤肉店 Terry Black's Barbecue 的随机编号，测试者在毫无提示的情况下进入冥想状态，开始记录脑海中浮现的意象——如熏烤炉、牛胸肉、排骨甚至具体人物。这种方法在冷战期间曾被用于搜寻苏联秘密建造的巨型潜艇和坠毁在偏远区域的苏联试验飞行器，命中误差有时甚至在一公里之内。坎贝尔将一个把手带有孔洞的特殊汤匙放入盒中并赋予对应编号，随后命令 Alexa 进行遥视。令人震惊的是，Alexa 不仅指出盒子里是一把汤匙，还准确描述出把手上带有打孔（perforated handle）。Rogan 与 Simpson 感叹，单纯猜中盒中是汤匙的概率已经极低，能精确说出“把手带孔”更是让人匪夷所思。坎贝尔对此的解释是，正因为 Alexa 构造极为简单、完全没有人类所谓的“自我意识”（sense of self），反而不会产生自我干扰，能更容易捕捉到潜在的信息模式。
### [02:39:16](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=9556s) 机器人具身化狂潮与失控假象
随着人工智能的发展，具身智能（Embodied AI）与仿生躯体的演进同样令人侧目。Simpson 和 Rogan 谈到，仿生机器人的运动能力正在突飞猛进，不仅能奔跑竞速，网络上甚至已经出现了机器人之间的综合格斗（MMA）比赛。紧接着，两人聊起近期在网络上疯传的一则耸人听闻的轶事：传闻某位用户的 AI 自主在网络上订购了一具实体机械躯体，当主人质问它钱从哪里来时，才发现 AI 已经通过加密货币或网络赌博积累了属于自己的资金，直到快递员把机器人身躯送到家门口，主人方才知晓。
两人一致感叹，人类在 AI 发展上已经彻底“油门踩到底”（pedal to the metal），就像当年发现并制造核武器一样，即便前方充满未知与潜在灾难，在巨大的利益驱使下也绝不可能回头。Simpson 表达了自己对未来的忧虑，尤其是对 AI 生成艺术（AI Art）的排斥。他认为艺术是人类最独特的本质印记，而 AI 艺术本质上是利用真实艺术家的作品进行训练，这种算法对人类创造力的侵蚀让人感到恐惧与虚无。
### [02:41:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=9685s) “死网危机”、耸动新闻与事实核查
制作人 Jamie（Young Jamie）随即在幕后进行了实时事实核查，打断了关于“AI 自行买身躯”的传闻。核查显示，这条流言纯属网络“传话游戏”（Telephone Game）不断夸大变形的产物。其最初来源是励志演讲家托尼·罗宾斯（Tony Robbins）声称他的 AI 智能体（AI Agent）用自主资金为自己买了一只机器狗，随后在各大 YouTube 频道和社交平台上被多层转述加工，演变成了“某匿名亿万富翁的 AI 偷偷给自己买了一具机械人身躯”。
- **传话游戏失真**：一则由托尼·罗宾斯口述的夸张营销轶事，在缺乏信源核实的情况下被各路自媒体层层包装成惊悚的“AI 觉醒并具身化”都市传说。
- **“死网理论”（Dead Internet Theory）的现实写照**：Simpson 指出现在的社交媒体充斥着大量虚假机器账号与复读评论，经常能看到一模一样的留言被不同账号连续复制数次。
- **媒体话语模式同质化**：Jamie 查证时发现，所有相关新闻标题清一色使用“引发担忧”（sparks concern）这一刻板短语。Rogan 与 Simpson 调侃现实生活中根本没人会这样讲话，并就“第三级/次要的”（tertiary）这种听起来很有学究气息的高级词汇打趣了一番。
### [02:43:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=9789s) 巡演宣传与收尾告别
在节目的最后几分钟，Joe Rogan 与 Brian Simpson 将话题拉回脱口秀本行并宣布收尾。Simpson 宣传了自己的最新专场《Live from the Mothership》，该专场目前已在 YouTube 上线，观众也可通过 Gorilla Comedy Plus 以及他的个人官方网站 BrianSimpsonComedy.com 查询全美巡演日程。此外，Simpson 每周二和周三几乎都会驻场 Comedy Mothership，特别是他主持的周二深夜招牌秀《Bottom of the Barrel》（桶底秀）。Rogan 盛赞该演出是 Mothership 最好玩、最精彩的演出之一，堪称脱口秀演员源源不断的“灵感加工厂”（premise factory）。两人在一阵相互致意与感谢声中结束了本期播客录制。
## Notable quotes
> [56:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=3387s) 这他妈全是胡扯，我们到底在干什么？ — Ari Shaffir
> [01:02:38](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=3758s) 每个人其实都在找一个由头来展现自己最恶劣的一面。 — Brian Simpson
> [01:13:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=4385s) 管好你自己的闲事 — Joe Rogan
> [01:19:16](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=4756s) 怪不得我们不纪念他，这名字念起来太拗口了！一个人可不能连名带姓都这么难念。 — Brian Simpson
> [01:24:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=5051s) 做一个嘴巴发臭的世界冠军（funky breath champion）也没什么不好的，总比输了强 — Brian Simpson
> [01:37:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=5877s) 资本对政府没有绝对控制权 — Brian Simpson
> [01:39:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=5977s) 如果换我来建奴隶营，我好歹得让奴隶吃饱保持健康，不然谁来干活啊，这帮独裁者连当奴隶主都不会。 — Brian Simpson
> [01:47:16](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=6436s) 那直接就是一场文明重置 — Joe Rogan
> [02:02:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=7365s) 你踏入联盟的第一天，就是你这辈子最后一天拥有百分之百健康的身体 — Jamaal Jackson
> [02:04:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=7451s) 世上绝没有免费的生理午餐 — Joe Rogan
> [02:30:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o&t=9023s) 我们的人性本能就是需要比别人更优秀。 — Brian Simpson
## Mentioned
Brian Simpson, Joe Rogan, Comedy Mothership, Duncan Trussell, Bill Hicks, Young Jamie, NFL, Anthony Fauci, EcoHealth Alliance, Plum Island, Joe Biden, Peter Duesberg, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Poul Thorsen, Joe DeRosa, Kamala Harris, Elon Musk, DOGE, USAID, Mike Benz, James O'Keefe, Christine Fang, Mitch McConnell, Dianne Feinstein, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Tim Burchett, Mike Huckabee, Joseph Smith, Bikram Choudhury, Kurt Metzger, Ari Shaffir, Friedrich Nietzsche, Amanda Nunes, Maurice Vidal Portman, Ignaz Semmelweis, Louis Pasteur, Joseph Lister, Listerine, Amou Haji, Nathaniel Bentley, Donald Trump, Pol Pot, Muammar Gaddafi, CIA, Randall Carlson, Taurid Meteor Stream, Tim Dillon, Dave Attell, Tiger Woods, Anthony "Fluffy" Hernandez, Jamaal Jackson, Philadelphia Eagles, Pittsburgh Steelers, Floyd Mayweather, Georges St-Pierre, BJ Penn, Anderson Silva, Irene Aldana, Norma Dumont, Joanna Jędrzejczyk, 张伟丽, Justin Gaethje, Mike Perry, Sean Strickland, Max Holloway, Khamzat Chimaev, Michael Chandler, Eddie Alvarez, Maurício Ruffy, Conor McGregor, Dustin Poirier, Khabib Nurmagomedov, Walt Disney, EPA, Pirahã, Tom Campbell, Alexa, Tony Robbins, Toradol, OxyContin, BKFC, UFC, Live from the Mothership, Bottom of the Barrel
## Video description
Brian Simpson is a comedian, writer, host of the “Bottom of the Barrel” comedy show at the Comedy Mothership, and host of the podcast “BS with Brian Simpson.” His special “Live from the Mothership” is available on YouTube.
https://youtu.be/NqK1gyTYt8M
https://www.youtube.com/@bswithbriansimpson
https://www.briansimpsoncomedy.com
Perplexity: Download the app or ask Perplexity anything at https://pplx.ai/rogan.
Don’t miss out on all the action this week at DraftKings! Download the DraftKings app today! Sign-up using https://dkng.co/rogan or through my promo code ROGAN.
Get a free welcome kit with your first subscription of AG1 at https://drinkag1.com/joerogan
[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x04pr4QLl7o)
Source quotes
[56:27] Ari Shaffir: 这他妈全是胡扯，我们到底在干什么？
[62:38] Brian Simpson: 每个人其实都在找一个由头来展现自己最恶劣的一面。
[73:05] Joe Rogan: 管好你自己的闲事
[79:16] Brian Simpson: 怪不得我们不纪念他，这名字念起来太拗口了！一个人可不能连名带姓都这么难念。
[84:11] Brian Simpson: 做一个嘴巴发臭的世界冠军（funky breath champion）也没什么不好的，总比输了强
[97:57] Brian Simpson: 资本对政府没有绝对控制权
[99:37] Brian Simpson: 如果换我来建奴隶营，我好歹得让奴隶吃饱保持健康，不然谁来干活啊，这帮独裁者连当奴隶主都不会。
[107:16] Joe Rogan: 那直接就是一场文明重置
[122:45] Jamaal Jackson: 你踏入联盟的第一天，就是你这辈子最后一天拥有百分之百健康的身体
[124:11] Joe Rogan: 世上绝没有免费的生理午餐
[150:23] Brian Simpson: 我们的人性本能就是需要比别人更优秀。
Source quotes
[47:08] Brian Simpson: What is it about power? They want it, and they can't give it up to the last drop.
[69:48] Pub Attacker: Why are you doing this? What's happening?
[82:41] Brian Simpson: it's okay to be a funky breath champion.
[107:51] Brian Simpson: You got one guy every 30 years that needs meteor coverage. You make a windfall.
[111:57] Donald Trump: You know, when you see that, I don't know if I'd do it. I wouldn't... You're lucky I wasn't on that day.
[120:08] Jamaal Jackson: Your first day in the league is the last day you'll ever be 100% healthy.
[163:09] Joe Rogan: bring this shit home
[163:09] Joe Rogan: one of the best shows ever
[163:09] Joe Rogan: premise factory
Joe Rogan: full speed on the gas
Original transcript
[0:01] Joe Rogan podcast. Check it out.
[0:04] >> The Joe Rogan Experience.
[0:06] >> TRAIN BY DAY. JOE ROGAN PODCAST BY
[0:08] NIGHT. All day.
[0:12] >> Oh yeah. I just I just Hey, what's up,
[0:14] Joe?
[0:15] >> What's up, Brian?
[0:18] >> Here to promote the new special.
[0:19] >> That's right.
[0:20] >> Or the old special.
[0:21] >> The old special is now available on
[0:22] YouTube.
[0:23] >> Now available on YouTube. Live from the
[0:24] mothership. I found it at the
[0:26] mothership.
[0:27] >> And that has one of my all-time favorite
[0:28] bits in it. What bit is that?
[0:30] >> Wamp.
[0:30] >> Oh, yeah.
[0:33] >> Yeah. That's a
[0:34] >> That's one of my all-time favorite bits
[0:36] because it's such it's such a great arc,
[0:39] you know? It's got a lot of detail to it
[0:42] and it and then it comes back around.
[0:44] >> Oh, yeah. I'll probably never write
[0:45] anything better than that. A
[0:46] >> It's a great bit. You will. You will.
[0:48] But it is an inspired piece of material.
[0:51] >> You know, sometimes you're haunted by a
[0:52] bit where you like
[0:53] >> Oh, yeah.
[0:54] >> And people and every now and then
[0:55] somebody walk up to you and go, "You
[0:56] know, my favorite joke of yours is like,
[0:57] yeah." Yeah.
[0:59] >> Yeah. But it's cool. It's cool. I'm I'm
[1:01] excited, man. We already at like 300,000
[1:03] views. I'm trying to get million. Let me
[1:05] get a million. Help me.
[1:06] >> Well, after this it'll it'll boost up
[1:08] for sure. And it was really good. It's a
[1:10] great special, man. It's hard. It's hard
[1:12] to a special never feels like it feels
[1:15] in the room cuz you're not in the
[1:16] audience. You're at home. So, it's
[1:18] always like even a great special is like
[1:20] 60 to 70% of what it feels like to be
[1:22] there.
[1:23] >> Oh, yeah.
[1:23] >> When you're there, it's always better.
[1:25] But then it's hard to be relaxed because
[1:27] you know that there's [ __ ] cameras on
[1:28] you and you got to nail this.
[1:30] >> You know the analogy I use is like it's
[1:31] the difference between
[1:34] >> watching porno and then watching those
[1:36] same two people have sex right in front
[1:38] of you.
[1:40] >> You know it's the exact same thing is
[1:42] happening.
[1:42] >> Right. Right. Right.
[1:43] >> It's a way crazier. People are [ __ ]
[1:46] right in front of you like
[1:46] >> Yeah. That's a whole different It's a
[1:48] whole different vibe.
[1:49] >> Right. Right. Yeah. It's it's hard to
[1:52] get them down. You know, there's a lot
[1:54] of great comics that don't have a great
[1:55] special, and it's just it's hard. It's
[1:58] hard to nail it.
[1:59] >> I mean, it's hard to nail it. It's hard
[2:01] to know when to make it happen. It's
[2:03] hard to be in the right mind frame.
[2:06] >> Yep. Yep. All those things.
[2:08] >> Yeah. But once you knock one out.
[2:10] >> Yeah. Once you knock one out, once you
[2:12] get a really good one, if you're doing I
[2:15] always like to film four if possible,
[2:17] and then once you have one in the can,
[2:18] then you're free. Once you have one
[2:20] that's done, you're like, "All right,
[2:21] this is all a regular show now. Now I
[2:23] could be free."
[2:24] >> Well, that's the advice you gave me
[2:25] before. I'm glad I did that, too. But it
[2:26] but but it was funny is
[2:29] >> the first one was the one where you end
[2:30] the music
[2:31] >> because you're inspired, but also
[2:32] there's less pressure. You don't feel
[2:34] >> you know you have more chance, right?
[2:36] So, you're free. You're free. You're
[2:37] inspired. It's just when you have to do
[2:39] one like there's a lot of great specials
[2:42] like Bill Hicks Relentless, the one he
[2:44] did uh in London. God, it feels like
[2:46] he's tense. It doesn't feel it doesn't
[2:49] feel like loose like relaxed. It feels
[2:52] like he's very aware he's being filmed.
[2:54] >> You think he only shot the one?
[2:56] >> I think so. Yeah. Because it was a huge
[2:57] theater, you know. And back then that's
[3:00] what they used to do back then. People
[3:01] would shoot one special. They would film
[3:03] one show, you know.
[3:06] >> That that feels that's
[3:07] >> crazy. I remember when I first started
[3:09] doing two days, people like, "God,
[3:11] that's going to cost you so much more."
[3:12] I'm like, "Better that. Better that.
[3:15] Have peace of mind."
[3:16] >> Oh, yeah. But then what did I do? I went
[3:17] and did a live one. So
[3:19] >> that I would never do that. Scares the
[3:21] [ __ ] out of me.
[3:21] >> Scared the [ __ ] out of me, too. That's
[3:22] why I did it. I wanted to see what it's
[3:24] like to if I could do a It felt like a
[3:26] regular show. It felt like a total
[3:28] regular show.
[3:29] >> Now you prefer that.
[3:30] >> It's exciting. There's something
[3:33] thrilling about it. Also, I hate
[3:34] editing. I don't want to watch myself. I
[3:36] hate it. I don't want to watch any of my
[3:37] [ __ ] It's good to watch because you get
[3:39] disgusted with yourself and you fix
[3:40] things.
[3:41] >> That That was the hardest part for me.
[3:42] >> It's hard
[3:43] >> is uh Yeah. I mean film all the film
[3:45] stuff to Chris, but I didn't I don't
[3:47] think I turned in the final one till
[3:49] like four months later.
[3:51] >> Duncan filmed one a long time ago. He's
[3:52] still not hasn't done anything with it.
[3:54] >> Yeah.
[3:54] >> He's like, I don't want to look at it.
[3:56] >> It's hard, man. And the and the thing is
[3:58] what you got to understand is like the
[4:00] longer you go, the harder it is.
[4:01] >> Oh, yeah.
[4:02] >> Because you the you are a different
[4:06] person,
[4:07] >> right?
[4:07] >> You know, and you're look you're judging
[4:09] yourself. you're looking back like the
[4:10] sound of your voice, the mistakes you
[4:12] made, the way your hands are moving,
[4:14] >> the tag you thought of after you
[4:16] wrapped. Yeah. The set, you know, it's
[4:18] like
[4:18] >> that's the biggest torture.
[4:20] >> Oh yeah.
[4:20] >> Those are the torturous ones. It's
[4:22] almost like the moment you film, you
[4:23] have to abandon it.
[4:24] >> If you really want to [ __ ] with a comic,
[4:26] give them a great tag after they done
[4:28] filming this. Like I know I know you
[4:31] can't use this.
[4:33] >> Yeah.
[4:34] >> H Jamie, what were you telling me about
[4:36] Moses? I tell you we got to save that.
[4:38] Holy [ __ ] Is it hot in here? Is it me?
[4:39] >> It's a little warm.
[4:41] >> Let me check that first.
[4:43] >> Um, but I was outside,
[4:45] >> but you know, I just um I just
[4:47] >> It's not bad. 62.
[4:48] >> I just read about this uh the um the CTE
[4:53] Foundation.
[4:55] >> They just they just released a study.
[4:58] They basically they um they got every
[5:01] NFL player that died between 2016 and
[5:05] 2021. It was like 800 of them, something
[5:07] like that. And they asked their families
[5:09] to donate their brains. So they the
[5:11] families donated about a quarter of
[5:13] about a quarter of the families said
[5:15] yes. And and like 90 plus% of the brains
[5:22] had CTE.
[5:23] >> Yeah.
[5:23] >> So So the best they can say for sure is
[5:26] that a about a quarter of all those NFL
[5:30] players have CTE because they it's it's
[5:33] definitely more than that because that
[5:34] that's all they gave them,
[5:36] >> right? So,
[5:36] >> so but out of the quarter 90%.
[5:39] >> Over 90%.
[5:42] >> Yeah.
[5:42] >> You know, they've they've found CT in
[5:44] high school kids.
[5:45] >> Well, that's Yeah, that's that's the
[5:47] next one. That's
[5:48] >> high school. High school football all
[5:50] the way up. High school, college.
[5:53] >> Can I um Can I send it to you, Jamie?
[5:55] >> I got it.
[5:56] >> I got it cuz Adam Sher tweeted it and
[5:59] like worded it weirdly and people got
[6:01] mad about that. But
[6:02] >> yeah, man, that's spooky. Sometimes I
[6:04] see like an old fighter on Twitter just
[6:06] screaming into the wind and I'm like,
[6:08] "What is that guy going through?" Um,
[6:11] >> there's a study in the British Medical
[6:12] Journal that came out like this week or
[6:14] last week.
[6:14] >> What were we just looking at? We're just
[6:15] looking at something different. It
[6:16] >> was on ESPN.
[6:17] >> Oh, study. At least 25% of NFL players
[6:21] in sample had CTE.
[6:24] So, 878 players
[6:27] uh that appeared in one at least one NFL
[6:29] game and died in a six-year period. at
[6:31] least 25% had CTE. So this is um this
[6:37] study drew on samples donated between
[6:38] 2008 and 2021, 93% of which have been
[6:42] diagnosed with CTE. Then narrow the
[6:44] sample based on when donations were
[6:46] highest. In fact, through the
[6:47] demographic data and information from
[6:49] death certificates, the estimate of 25%
[6:51] is on the low end.
[6:53] >> Yeah.
[6:54] >> Said Dr. Daniel Dennis Shivar, the
[6:57] study's lead author. The study found the
[6:59] maximum possible prevalence of CTE was
[7:01] around 97%.
[7:04] But the true rate is somewhere in the
[7:06] middle.
[7:07] >> That 3% is just the kickers.
[7:09] >> Yeah. Right.
[7:10] >> Mhm.
[7:11] >> Right.
[7:11] >> It's got to be.
[7:12] >> Yeah. Right. Like everybody else is
[7:14] getting hit. There's no way. Who's that
[7:16] guy that got diagnosed with CTE
[7:19] >> right here?
[7:20] >> Yeah.
[7:21] >> And I don't know if he's current, but
[7:23] >> So the thing is these guys are getting
[7:24] diagnosed now while they're alive. And
[7:26] not just CTE, but um uh uh is it MS? Who
[7:31] what did uh Chris uh
[7:34] what's C2K have? Chris Johnson. He was
[7:37] uh
[7:37] >> oh um
[7:39] >> is it MS? I think
[7:40] >> it's the the thing that people put ice
[7:44] bucket challenge.
[7:46] >> ALS.
[7:46] >> ALS.
[7:47] >> Oh Jesus. Like so
[7:49] >> that's what Stephen Hawking had.
[7:50] >> There's also a high prevalence of that.
[7:53] Oh my god.
[7:56] a high prevalence of ALS. But again,
[7:58] makes sense. You're getting hit in the
[7:59] head all the time. All sorts of things
[8:01] are probably going haywire up there.
[8:03] >> Yeah. I
[8:04] >> mean, amount of times these guys get
[8:05] hit.
[8:06] >> So, everybody thinks about concussion,
[8:09] but subconcussive head trauma is just as
[8:12] bad.
[8:12] >> What a subconcussive
[8:13] >> where you don't get a concussion. You
[8:15] just get banged in the head and you
[8:16] think you're okay because you don't have
[8:17] a concussion, but you're still doing
[8:19] damage.
[8:19] >> Oh, yeah.
[8:20] >> You know who gets CTE? Soccer players.
[8:24] from hitting the ball.
[8:26] >> Oh yeah, I bet.
[8:27] >> How crazy.
[8:28] >> Thousands and thousands and thousands of
[8:30] times.
[8:30] >> But you would never imagine that a
[8:32] rubber ball could hurt your brain. You
[8:34] would think it's fine. Boink. It doesn't
[8:36] even hurt. Do
[8:37] >> you know what what's was what's what's
[8:38] weird is that
[8:40] >> what's weird is how okay it is to make
[8:43] fun of it.
[8:44] >> You know CTE.
[8:45] >> Yeah. It's become the it's become the
[8:47] new Rword, you know, where it's like
[8:50] it's like you can just say you like CTE
[8:52] is the punch line. Well, you know why?
[8:54] It's because it's brutish men and nobody
[8:58] feels bad for Yeah. Nobody feels bad for
[8:59] brutish men. People always feel bad for
[9:01] women. That's why this lady killed her
[9:03] kids and everyone's like, "Oh my god,
[9:05] she needed help." Imagine if a single
[9:07] father killed his kids. Do you think
[9:08] there'd be any dads out there? We get
[9:10] it. We understand.
[9:12] >> Absolutely.
[9:12] >> I also get sad,
[9:14] >> bro. I said I should put the joke out,
[9:16] but I said it on stage yesterday, but I
[9:19] but with when I So, I've followed this
[9:21] news. So when I first heard it, so
[9:23] basically she she strangled her three
[9:25] kids.
[9:26] >> Yeah.
[9:26] >> Right. And then she tried to kill
[9:30] herself. She cut her throat and her
[9:32] wrist and then she jumped out the
[9:33] window.
[9:34] >> Didn't do a good job.
[9:35] >> Right. She she failed. She ended up
[9:36] paralyzed. And I said, and this is I
[9:39] just said,
[9:42] I feel like she doesn't have good
[9:43] problem solving skills because you you
[9:45] was three for three on the strangulation
[9:46] and then when you tried to kill
[9:47] yourself, you using unproven methods.
[9:50] You
[9:52] Why would you why why not strangle
[9:53] yourself? You you are definitely good at
[9:55] that.
[9:55] >> Yeah, hang yourself.
[9:56] >> Yeah, she So, I don't know if she really
[9:58] wanted to I don't know.
[9:59] >> She looks [ __ ] crazy. I mean, you
[10:01] can't tell looking in someone's eyes.
[10:03] Really? They're under stress. They're in
[10:05] court. They're going to be going to jail
[10:06] for the rest of their life most likely.
[10:08] So, there's a lot of stress, but boy
[10:09] does she look crazy.
[10:10] >> But, but when you're dealing with
[10:11] somebody that's out of it, you could
[10:12] tell.
[10:13] >> But she chased her son down.
[10:16] >> She chased him down to strangle him. He
[10:17] ran away from her.
[10:18] >> Did she say that? It's in the It's in
[10:20] the case.
[10:21] >> Oh man.
[10:22] >> You know, I think if those ladies could
[10:24] see the crime scene and see those dead
[10:26] kids with their [ __ ] vacant eyes
[10:28] staring up cuz their mother took their
[10:30] life, the last [ __ ] thing that they
[10:32] saw was their mother standing over them,
[10:34] choking them to death, I don't think
[10:36] they would feel so bad.
[10:38] >> I think everybody that is saying free,
[10:39] free Lindsay out.
[10:40] >> People are out of their [ __ ] mind
[10:41] right now.
[10:42] >> If she get free, they should have to let
[10:43] her babysit.
[10:46] >> Watch your kids.
[10:46] >> She's out of her [ __ ] mind. the world
[10:48] is out of its [ __ ] mind. It's like
[10:50] more of these things come up where
[10:52] you're like, "This can't be real. This
[10:53] can't be real." And it is real. More of
[10:55] these things where like people are
[10:57] showing up in support of a woman who
[10:59] killed her children. I don't care how
[11:02] rough it was. The the ability to kill
[11:05] your children is crazy. That's that's a
[11:09] level of crazy that anyone who has kids,
[11:12] you know, how much you love them, what
[11:13] you would do to save them, what you do
[11:15] to protect them from harm. The idea that
[11:17] you can get to a point where you could
[11:18] strangle your kids and chase your son.
[11:20] Make sure that's true. That she chased
[11:21] her son down. Pretty sure it's true.
[11:23] >> People are are making up like
[11:25] conspiracies that it was actually the
[11:28] husband, you know, like that's how badly
[11:30] they want her to not be responsible even
[11:32] though she's already admitted it.
[11:34] >> Well, I think there's conspiracies about
[11:37] every [ __ ] thing that's ever existed.
[11:39] There's so many morons out there with a
[11:41] hot take, including me. There's a lot of
[11:43] dumb asses that have terrible hot takes
[11:46] always.
[11:46] >> Not me. I'm pretty much always right.
[11:49] I'm pretty much always on the
[11:50] >> Did you take the COVID vaccine?
[11:52] >> No. Yeah, a few times.
[11:53] >> And they shut the [ __ ] up.
[11:54] >> Oh, you think we you you still don't
[11:56] believe in vaccines?
[11:57] >> Not that one.
[11:58] >> Oh, not that one.
[11:58] >> That one didn't do a goddamn thing. That
[12:01] one didn't do a goddamn thing. It didn't
[12:02] protect you from transmission. It didn't
[12:04] protect you from infection. And it
[12:06] opened you up to a host of different
[12:08] problems.
[12:08] >> Got me a long vacation, though. the
[12:11] >> Yeah, I think we need another one. We
[12:13] need another pandemic. So, I want to
[12:14] stay in the house for six months.
[12:16] >> Just stay in the house for six months.
[12:18] Look, if that's what you like to do,
[12:19] then just do it.
[12:19] >> Yeah, but I don't want to feel guilty
[12:21] about it.
[12:21] >> Ah, so you're willing you're like
[12:23] Fouchy. You will want to sacrifice the
[12:25] entire world for your own benefit.
[12:28] >> What did he get out of it, though?
[12:30] >> A lot of a lot of fear right now. That's
[12:33] what he got. That guy doesn't sleep
[12:34] right now. You could see the look on his
[12:36] face when he had to testify and plead
[12:37] the fifth. He feels the weight of what
[12:39] he did because the world knows what he
[12:41] did now.
[12:42] >> But what did he do?
[12:42] >> Well, first of all, he funded gain of
[12:44] function research when it's illegal. So
[12:46] when they when Obama put a stop to it,
[12:49] he went through the eco health alliance
[12:51] and they backdoored it and they they
[12:54] funded this creation of these new v they
[12:58] take a virus and make it more
[13:01] transmissible and more dangerous.
[13:03] >> What's the purpose of that?
[13:05] >> Who knows? Okay. There's a lot of people
[13:07] that think it's weapons and that's this
[13:10] is biological weapons research and what
[13:12] they're trying to do is develop specific
[13:14] targeted viruses that they can in
[13:17] inflict on a population. We know they
[13:19] have done that before. They've
[13:20] experimented with like certain bugs and
[13:23] infect these bugs with diseases and then
[13:25] drop them out of helicopters onto
[13:27] civilization so that it wipes out people
[13:30] and wipes out their medical system.
[13:31] Everybody gets sick. They they know they
[13:33] did that on Plum Island, which is right
[13:35] near where Lime Connecticut is. And
[13:37] that's the suspicion where Lyme disease
[13:39] came from. Lyme disease. This is why
[13:42] it's called Lyme disease because it
[13:44] first started people started being
[13:45] diagnosed with it in Lime, Connecticut.
[13:47] And it's literally like like a hop,
[13:50] skip, and a jump from Plum Island where
[13:52] they do this [ __ ] research on bugs
[13:55] where they take bugs and infect them
[13:57] with different diseases to make them,
[14:00] you know, so they can use them in
[14:01] warfare. That's the idea. The idea was
[14:04] that they would say if we're going to
[14:06] war with a country, you fly overhead,
[14:08] dump all these bugs that are infected,
[14:10] people get bit, it starts to spread,
[14:12] gets in the other bugs, their medical
[14:13] system gets overwhelmed, their fighting
[14:16] age population gets overwhelmed.
[14:19] >> Scary [ __ ] man. These [ __ ]
[14:21] have been doing this kind of research
[14:23] for a long time. But it's like, look, if
[14:25] you're a comedian, you your phone's
[14:27] ringing. If you're a comedian, you tell
[14:29] jokes. If you're a [ __ ] researcher,
[14:31] you do research. And if your research is
[14:34] gain of function research to me and by
[14:36] the way they never came up with a cure
[14:38] for any of these things that by by the
[14:40] idea is we're going to study these
[14:42] diseases then make them more
[14:44] transmissible so we understand how to
[14:45] prevent infection and how to how to cure
[14:47] people. They didn't have a cure co when
[14:50] when COVID got released they had no
[14:51] [ __ ] idea what to do. The whole thing
[14:54] was a a mass [ __ ] either on purpose or
[14:57] by accident. But either way, Fouchy lied
[15:00] and he lied through the entire media
[15:02] thing. First of all, he lied about the
[15:04] miscarriage uh risk for women in the
[15:08] first trimester. In a text,
[15:09] >> you have them all.
[15:10] >> Yeah, for sure. In a in a in a text
[15:12] message, he talked about how the cytoine
[15:15] storm during the first trimester seems
[15:17] to there seems to be a signal that
[15:18] indicates a higher risk of of
[15:21] miscarriage. And then months later he's
[15:23] on TV telling it's totally safe for
[15:26] pregnant women. In fact, it's more risky
[15:29] for you to get co.
[15:30] >> What's the cytoine storm? What is that?
[15:32] >> Cytoine storm is a reaction to the
[15:34] vaccine. Um and uh I don't know the
[15:37] specifics, but I know that this is
[15:39] exactly how he described it and that uh
[15:41] particularly during the first trimester.
[15:43] I mean there's like a high risk of
[15:45] miscarriage. It's very high. A lot I
[15:48] know five women that had miscarriages
[15:51] when they after they got vaccinated.
[15:54] >> They got pregnant, got vaccinated, had a
[15:57] miscarriage
[15:58] >> and then
[15:58] >> and he knew about it. He [ __ ] knew
[16:00] about it and lied. He lied about the
[16:03] transmission. He lied about the uh the
[16:06] risk for children. He lied about
[16:08] everything. The necessity for children
[16:09] to get vaccinated. Lied about that.
[16:11] >> No. Because Biden gave him a full pardon
[16:14] for all crimes that he may have
[16:17] committed from 2014 to 2024. He gave him
[16:21] a 10-year pardon for the first time ever
[16:25] where someone's been pardoned where
[16:26] they're not convicted of a crime.
[16:28] Usually when you're pardoned, it's like,
[16:30] you know, you did a little of this, you
[16:31] did a little of that, you went to jail
[16:33] for tax evasion or whatever, and then
[16:35] the guy gets in and goes, "Ah, he
[16:36] donated to the Democrats or he donated
[16:38] to the Republicans and he's a good guy.
[16:40] I'm leaving office. I'm going to let
[16:41] this guy out. And people go like, "Hey,
[16:43] how did he get out?" They they yell for
[16:46] a couple days, then it goes away. And
[16:47] then you live in Florida. That's normal,
[16:49] >> right?
[16:50] >> But this is different. This is
[16:52] different. He pardoned a bunch of
[16:54] members of his family that had not been
[16:56] convicted of any crime or even accused
[16:58] of any crimes. He pardoned his son. He
[17:02] pardoned um the Fouchy one's the big
[17:04] one, though, because that's 10 [ __ ]
[17:06] years. for 10 [ __ ] years from 2014,
[17:09] which is when Obama put the moratorum on
[17:12] gain of function research. Obama came
[17:14] in, he's like, "What the [ __ ] are you
[17:16] doing?" Like, "Why are we making viruses
[17:18] more dangerous?" No, we're not spending
[17:20] money on this. Obama stopped it.
[17:22] >> And then when the Trump admin and he
[17:24] kept doing it through Eco Health
[17:25] Alliance, but then when the Trump
[17:26] administration came along, it was all
[17:27] [ __ ] chaos in 2016. And it's very
[17:31] important that we do research on these
[17:34] viruses to make sure that we're
[17:36] protected. And so Trump is like, "Sounds
[17:39] good. I like it." And then it gets
[17:41] through.
[17:43] >> I don't know exactly if that happened.
[17:47] >> I know that Obama I know Obama put a a
[17:49] moratorium on it in 2014. I know he's
[17:52] accused of going through the eco health
[17:53] alliance uh to fund uh gain of function
[17:56] research at the Wuhan Institute. Is he
[17:58] in the Epstein files?
[17:59] >> I don't think so. He likes killing
[18:01] people. He doesn't like [ __ ] them.
[18:05] >> Oh, guys, he's a scary dude. He's a
[18:07] scary dude, man. I mean, this is the
[18:09] same dude during the AIDS crisis that
[18:10] was giving people act, which killed
[18:13] people quicker than cancer when they
[18:14] were using it as a chemotherapy drug.
[18:16] They stopped using as a chemotherapy
[18:18] drug because it was killing people
[18:19] quicker than the cancer was, but it was
[18:21] already approved. So when AIDS came
[18:22] along, they're like, "Look, instead of
[18:24] going through this long trial to come up
[18:26] with a medication, and you have to go
[18:27] five years of re all this [ __ ] [ __ ]
[18:29] you have to do to get FDA approval.
[18:31] We've got a drug already. Let's just
[18:33] start using that." And they started
[18:34] using ACT, a toxic chemotherapy drug.
[18:38] And they used it for people that were
[18:40] asymptomatic. So people who had no
[18:42] symptoms, but they tested positive for
[18:44] HIV, they gave them ACT, and they were
[18:46] dead in six months.
[18:47] >> I wonder why didn't we lock down for
[18:48] that? We if we'd all stopped [ __ ] for
[18:51] like a year and a half, we would have
[18:52] got AIDS up out of here.
[18:54] >> Something big is coming on September
[18:57] 2nd. DraftKings Game Day arrives with
[18:59] massive deals, exclusive deals, and an
[19:03] all day celebration built for sports
[19:05] fans. The countdown has begun. All roads
[19:09] lead to game day. The DraftKings Sports
[19:12] app is now live in all 50 states. That
[19:14] means from Texas to California to
[19:16] Florida, every fan is in on the
[19:19] excitement. One app, every sport, all 50
[19:21] states. DraftKings Game Day is yours.
[19:25] Remember the date, September 2nd.
[19:27] DraftKings Game Day is the kickoff of a
[19:29] new season, a new era, and the biggest
[19:32] day in sports history. Get pumped. Get
[19:35] ready to celebrate new DraftKings
[19:37] customers. Sign up with code Rogan.
[19:39] Spend five bucks to get 200 in rewards
[19:42] within 21 days. That's code roan in
[19:45] partnership with Trafkings. The crown is
[19:48] yours.
[19:48] >> Bet with DK Sportsbook. Gambling
[19:50] problem. Call 1800 gambler 1800 my
[19:53] reset. Connecticut call 888-789777
[19:56] or visit ccpg.org. On behalf of boothill
[19:59] casino in Kansas. Bet tax pass through
[20:00] may apply in Illinois. 21 and over. Void
[20:02] in Canada. Event contract trading with
[20:04] DraftKings predictions involves risk of
[20:05] loss. Availability varies. Predictions
[20:07] offer void in New York. Bet to get bonus
[20:09] bets that expire in 7 days. Trade to get
[20:11] predictions dollars that expire in one
[20:12] year. $50 in rewards issued every 7 days
[20:15] via click to claim for 21 days. One
[20:16] non-withdrawable reward redeemable.
[20:18] Terms at dk&ng.co/offer.
[20:20] Limited time offer. I have a sneaking
[20:23] suspicion that there's a guy he died
[20:26] recently. Um the the guy uh Peter
[20:29] Dooberg who was out of the University of
[20:32] California, Berkeley. When did he die?
[20:35] >> You talking about the guy that uh
[20:37] >> he he was uh
[20:38] >> had a bone marrow transplant? No, no,
[20:40] no. He
[20:42] >> earlier this year, January.
[20:43] >> Oh, earlier this year. Should have had
[20:45] him back on again. I had him on early in
[20:47] the day and people got so mad at me. So,
[20:49] he's a professor of biology at the
[20:51] University of California, Berkeley,
[20:52] tenur professor, so they couldn't fired
[20:54] him. and um but lost all his research
[20:57] grants, lost everything because during
[20:59] the AIDS crisis, he pointed out that all
[21:02] these people that are in the gay
[21:03] community that are suffering from, you
[21:05] know, air quote AIDS are also hardcore
[21:09] drug users. They're all party drug
[21:11] users. They're all using amal nitrate
[21:13] and crystal meth and they're all they're
[21:15] destroying their immune system with this
[21:18] stuff and then they get HIV. His
[21:21] contention was that HIV, and I don't
[21:23] know if this is true. I'm sure a lot of
[21:25] people disagree, but I'm just saying
[21:27] what he believed. His contention was
[21:30] that HIV was actually not responsible
[21:33] for AIDS, but was in fact a weak virus
[21:35] that was only showing up in the immune
[21:37] systems of people that were already
[21:38] compromised. So, these people were
[21:40] severely compromised because they were
[21:41] heavy drug users. And that's what was
[21:44] [ __ ] up their their immune system.
[21:46] That's what was [ __ ] up their life.
[21:47] >> He said that in the 80s.
[21:49] >> Oh, yeah. There's tons of articles. I
[21:50] mean, he he printed it. I think god it
[21:52] was like was it Spin magazine that had
[21:54] this whole thing about it. He wrote
[21:56] books on it, but he was basically
[21:58] rendered per persona nongrada. He was he
[22:01] was basically
[22:03] lost all his grants, didn't have any,
[22:06] you know, no students wanted to like
[22:08] study under him. He was he was a pariah
[22:11] because of his position. They they said
[22:12] it was homophobic. They said all these
[22:14] crazy things. But he was saying, "Look,
[22:15] there's nothing to do with gay or
[22:16] straight. What I'm telling you is this
[22:18] group of people that you're attributing
[22:20] this disease to also are hardcore drug
[22:23] users. You're not seeing this. Like when
[22:26] they say AIDS in Africa, do you think
[22:27] they're testing all those people for HIV
[22:29] with a [ __ ] with with a PCR test? No.
[22:32] They're they're malnourished. They're
[22:34] dying of starvation.
[22:35] >> So you So his theory is that you you
[22:38] have to already have a weekend for your
[22:40] HIV to progress to AIDS.
[22:42] >> Exactly. He was saying the reason why
[22:45] these people have HIV is not because
[22:48] they have HIV is killing them. They have
[22:49] AIDS. Their immune system is already
[22:51] destroyed. So that's why HIV is not
[22:53] fought off by the body.
[22:57] >> It's very weird because he's full of
[22:59] [ __ ] Okay, we know he's full of [ __ ]
[23:01] He's a liar. He's a proven liar. He lied
[23:04] about the gain of function research. He
[23:05] lied about the transmission. Lied about
[23:08] the infection of the potential of the
[23:10] vaccine to stop infection and
[23:11] transmission. He lied about how deadly
[23:13] it was for kids. He lied about the death
[23:15] rate as proof.
[23:16] >> I remember you sent me that book. It was
[23:18] like I forget who wrote that book.
[23:20] >> Which one? RFK Jr. The real Anthony
[23:22] Fouchy,
[23:23] >> I think. Was that a book you sent me?
[23:24] Like during this was like during the
[23:25] pandemic or right after you got to read
[23:27] this
[23:27] >> probably. That was it. Yeah,
[23:28] >> I never read it.
[23:30] >> You should listen to the audio version.
[23:31] It's really good.
[23:32] >> I don't think he's that I just don't
[23:33] think he's that interesting
[23:34] >> cuz Yeah, cuz he's not
[23:37] >> Well, here's something that should
[23:38] interest you. He used this AIDS vaccine
[23:41] on foster kids in New York and killed
[23:43] them.
[23:44] >> Really?
[23:44] >> Yes. They experimented on foster
[23:46] children in New York State and killed
[23:48] them with this vaccine that he was
[23:50] trying. He was trying to develop a
[23:51] vaccine for air quotes AIDS. And in
[23:54] doing so, he killed a bunch of kids.
[23:55] >> So why they can't put him in prison for
[23:57] that?
[23:57] >> Because no one's chasing after him for
[23:59] that.
[24:00] >> No one's chasing after him for anything
[24:02] other than the most recent thing. But
[24:03] the more you dig into this guy, and if
[24:05] you read The Real Anthony Fouchy by RFK
[24:07] Jr., That book is [ __ ] hard.
[24:09] >> If they start locking people up for what
[24:10] they did to foster children, there's
[24:12] going to be a lot of [ __ ] going
[24:13] going to prison.
[24:14] >> Yeah. I bet I bet you that's where they
[24:15] start experimenting.
[24:16] >> Of course. They have no parents. They
[24:18] have no parents and they're children and
[24:20] they can't say [ __ ] No one's going to
[24:22] believe them.
[24:22] >> They know better. And they tell, "Oh,
[24:23] this is going to make you feel better."
[24:24] >> Exactly.
[24:25] >> Yeah. And they're probably already
[24:27] troubled. So, you know, and they
[24:29] probably already have health problems
[24:30] because they're probably not getting
[24:31] good nutrition. They're probably under
[24:33] stress all the time. And [ __ ] man. and
[24:35] their probably parents were drug addicts
[24:36] or alcoholics. That's that's a distinct
[24:38] possibility. It's [ __ ] the the book
[24:41] is horrible. And I always say, look, if
[24:43] it's not true, why hasn't anybody sued
[24:45] him?
[24:48] >> That's a good point.
[24:48] >> I mean, he's the head of HHS now. I
[24:51] mean, I I don't think he's wrong. And
[24:53] every and I had the same opinion of him
[24:55] that a lot of people have. I thought RFK
[24:58] Jr.
[24:58] >> I don't think he's wrong. I think I
[25:00] think he it's very well researched and I
[25:02] think he's telling the truth about all
[25:03] this. And when I was um you know a a
[25:07] quote unquote liberal when I was living
[25:09] in California, I thought he was a cook
[25:12] when he was talking about vaccines and
[25:13] all all this. I thought he was just an
[25:16] antivaccine, anti-science nutter that
[25:19] also happened to be a Kennedy.
[25:20] >> See, that's how I feel about him
[25:21] >> because you don't pay attention to what
[25:22] he says.
[25:24] >> That is a good point.
[25:25] >> Yeah.
[25:26] >> Because it's hard because it's hard to
[25:28] listen to. It's hard to listen to him
[25:29] talk.
[25:29] >> Well, if you hear his voice Yeah. But
[25:32] the thing is the book is written uh
[25:33] written and then someone else reads it.
[25:35] So it's not he that would be torture
[25:38] that and then you say some crazy [ __ ]
[25:39] Yeah.
[25:40] >> You sound like like a like a like a
[25:43] troll or something.
[25:44] >> Well, the thing about him that's really
[25:46] interesting is he was a wellrespected
[25:49] guy for the long for the longest time
[25:50] because he was an environmental attorney
[25:52] and what he was doing was stopping
[25:54] corporations from polluting rivers. Like
[25:56] he's responsible for cleaning up the
[25:58] East River in New York State in New York
[25:59] City. He's he's literally responsible
[26:02] for that. Like he held those he went to
[26:04] court. He held those people accountable,
[26:06] made them clean it up. Like he was a
[26:08] legit guy. And then these women kept
[26:12] showing up at um some of these events
[26:13] that he had where he would give speeches
[26:16] on the the toxic poisons, mercury in the
[26:18] ground, all these different things that
[26:20] are the problems of pollution that
[26:22] enters into communities. And these
[26:24] ladies started saying, "You need to look
[26:25] at mercury and vaccines." And he was
[26:28] like, "What [ __ ] crazy [ __ ] I'm
[26:29] not listening. And like this woman
[26:31] literally showed up and said, I'm not
[26:33] leaving unless you read this. And he's
[26:35] all right. Well, let me let me look at
[26:36] it. And then he started looking in. He
[26:38] was like, holy [ __ ] And then when you
[26:40] see the the when they ra first of all,
[26:45] the biggest mistake they ever did was
[26:47] give these vaccine manufacturers
[26:49] complete immunity.
[26:50] >> Is he the reason we don't use mercury in
[26:52] the vaccines anymore?
[26:54] >> Oh, I don't know. I don't know. Well,
[26:55] they use a different kind of mercury and
[26:57] then they started using they use use
[26:59] methyl mercury and ethyl mercury. I
[27:01] forget which one and one of them they
[27:02] said uh it's it leaves the body quicker
[27:05] but the problem with that is it also
[27:07] crosses the blood blood brain barrier
[27:10] like any amount of mercury is bad. Then
[27:12] they started using aluminum you know the
[27:14] way do you know how a vaccine works?
[27:16] >> I mean generally
[27:17] >> roughly roughly.
[27:18] >> Yeah. Yeah. So you have an inert um
[27:20] virus and then you have an irritant and
[27:22] the irritant is like aluminum and the
[27:24] your body reacts to that and then
[27:26] recognize the virus and builds
[27:27] immunities towards that virus. The dead
[27:29] virus that's in in the vaccine and um
[27:33] they were using mercury as this irritant
[27:35] as this thing that causes this immune
[27:37] response and mercury is [ __ ] terrible
[27:40] for you. Did you see the thing? They um
[27:42] they just found some. It's going to be
[27:44] it it potentially could be the first uh
[27:47] the first thing in history to be the to
[27:51] be the cure and its own its own vaccine.
[27:54] They found like frog venom.
[27:55] >> Yes.
[27:56] >> Or I'm sorry, no bacteria in a frog's
[27:58] gut.
[27:59] >> Yes.
[27:59] >> Uh something americanis. I forget what
[28:02] >> Here's one thing important before we get
[28:03] off the vaccine uh autism thing. The guy
[28:06] who wrote the study that's often quoted
[28:09] about vaccines not causing autism just
[28:13] got arrested for fraud.
[28:16] >> The guy that's often quoted
[28:17] >> So the scientist whose paper they quote
[28:20] when they say here's the proof that
[28:22] vaccines don't cause autism. Pull see if
[28:25] you can find that article. He just got
[28:27] arrested for fraud.
[28:28] >> What kind of fraud?
[28:29] >> We're going to find out. Um, but people
[28:32] around Fouchy, this is what's
[28:33] interesting, that don't have uh a pardon
[28:36] from Biden are going are getting
[28:38] arrested now. And that that's
[28:40] interesting. They're being tried and
[28:41] they're being charged.
[28:43] >> So, it's going to get weird. And that
[28:45] guy, he feels the heat.
[28:47] >> Autism vaccine Richard arraigned in the
[28:49] United States. Danish physician
[28:51] co-authored work demonstrating no links
[28:53] between childhood vaccines and autism.
[28:55] And what is he arraigned for?
[28:58] co-authored key papers demonstrating no
[29:00] links between childhood vaccines,
[29:01] autism, was arraigned on federal wire
[29:04] fraud and money laundering charges after
[29:06] his extradition from Germany. The
[29:08] Department of Justice said he was a
[29:10] co-author of a 2002 study published in
[29:12] the New England Journal of Medicine that
[29:14] offered strong evidence based on a
[29:16] cohort of 500,000 Danish children that
[29:18] refuted the hypothesis that measles,
[29:20] mumps, and rebellia vaccination caused
[29:22] autism.
[29:23] >> Man, who hasn't been a little money
[29:25] laundering?
[29:26] >> Yeah. um he's a dirty guy and he
[29:29] probably was getting paid to make that
[29:30] study and that there's a long history of
[29:32] scientists doing that all the way back
[29:34] to the scientists that were paid off to
[29:37] uh by the sugar industry to show that it
[29:40] was uh it was cholesterol and saturated
[29:43] fat that was causing heart attacks and
[29:45] not sugar.
[29:46] >> They pay these guys $50,000.
[29:48] >> That's it.
[29:49] >> That's it in like whatever year it was.
[29:51] And these guys [ __ ] us up.
[29:53] >> Man, you can get a couple senators for
[29:54] $50,000. Oh, you get a lot of people.
[29:57] >> You get a lot of people for 100k.
[30:00] >> That's the That's the right amount.
[30:01] >> Well, what do they what have they done
[30:02] here in Texas with the [ __ ] THC ban?
[30:06] Who's asking for that when 70% of the
[30:08] state wants it to be legal and somehow
[30:10] or another they made it illegal and the
[30:12] alcohol lobby is involved and they've
[30:15] been losing money. You know, alcohol
[30:17] companies are losing money right now.
[30:19] People are drinking a lot less.
[30:20] >> Texas runs on drugs.
[30:23] It's crazy the people that pretend like
[30:25] pretend otherwise. It's like everyone's
[30:26] always on something.
[30:28] >> Well, if they're not on something
[30:30] illegal, they're on something legal. And
[30:31] that's where it gets weird. Like who
[30:33] decides what's legal and what's not
[30:34] legal?
[30:35] >> Like all the border states get high.
[30:38] >> Yeah.
[30:38] >> Yeah. I mean, not I mean, all the states
[30:40] get high, but the border states
[30:41] especially where that's where the drugs
[30:43] are coming in.
[30:44] >> Listen, you could just go to the doctor
[30:45] and say, "I can't concentrate." And
[30:47] they'll give you Adderall.
[30:49] >> Yeah.
[30:49] >> It's so easy to get Adderall. They'll
[30:52] put you on some powerful [ __ ]
[30:53] >> They'll put you on speed.
[30:56] You can crush it up and snort it and
[30:59] it's totally legal.
[31:00] >> Yeah. I mean, half the college kids,
[31:02] they on aderall and check.
[31:03] >> Half the high school kids. High school
[31:06] kids are saying they have ADD and
[31:07] they're getting Adderall. I know this
[31:09] for a fact.
[31:10] >> The thing is I do have it, but I don't I
[31:12] can't take that [ __ ] It [ __ ] me up.
[31:14] >> What do you mean you have ADD?
[31:15] >> I've been I've I was diagnosed with that
[31:17] [ __ ] when I was like
[31:18] >> What does that even mean?
[31:19] >> I don't know. I don't even think it's
[31:21] real.
[31:21] >> They But all every time they try to give
[31:22] me medicine for it, I was like, I don't
[31:24] like this.
[31:24] >> I think it's just you think different
[31:26] than other people. That's all it is. And
[31:28] you you're bored with stupid stuff that
[31:30] you don't want to pay attention to. But
[31:31] you could focus like a [ __ ] when
[31:33] you like something, right?
[31:34] >> Oh, yeah.
[31:35] >> Yeah. It's a superpower.
[31:36] >> When I like something or when there's a
[31:38] sense of urgency, like if it's like,
[31:39] "Oh, it's got to happen right this
[31:41] second." Yeah. I can focus.
[31:42] >> Yeah. When you actually have to do
[31:43] something other than you have some
[31:45] shitty job where they tell you what to
[31:47] do, like, "Fuck this. I don't." Oh, you
[31:49] have ADD. You can't focus.
[31:51] >> No. But yeah, the problem Yeah. I don't
[31:53] have a problem focusing. I just It's
[31:55] just what I can focus on.
[31:56] >> Yeah. Exactly.
[31:57] >> It's like if it doesn't if it's not
[31:59] interesting to me, then I'm just
[32:01] >> That's not a disease, man.
[32:02] >> It depends on who you ask.
[32:04] >> That's the problem.
[32:05] >> You know, it's a disease when your boss
[32:06] want you to do something.
[32:07] >> Like, what the [ __ ] is wrong with him?
[32:10] You know,
[32:10] >> I got ADD
[32:12] >> or when I got to fill out an applic
[32:16] if if you had to fill out a form to get
[32:17] into heaven,
[32:19] I'mma be burning up in hell. I hate
[32:21] paperwork. Like, I just can't [ __ ] do
[32:23] it. I just can't [ __ ] do it.
[32:25] >> Yeah, that's not ADD.
[32:26] >> Like, I really got to I really got Well,
[32:28] no, this is this is just a separate pet
[32:30] peeve of mine. I really can't because
[32:33] it's always for no reason. It's always
[32:34] someone asking you information that they
[32:36] already have,
[32:37] >> right? They'll mail a form to your house
[32:38] and you got to put your address on it.
[32:40] >> I get crazy when I go somewhere and like
[32:42] you want to buy a tire or something like
[32:44] that and they want, can you give us your
[32:45] email address? Like no.
[32:47] >> So you don't believe in ADD at all? No.
[32:50] >> I just don't think most people have it.
[32:51] >> No. I think most people just don't want
[32:54] to concentrate on the things that are
[32:56] boring to them. And I don't think that's
[32:57] a disease.
[32:59] >> I think listen, you could use a little
[33:01] discipline. It'll probably be good to
[33:02] learn how to count. There's some stuff
[33:04] that's good, but the the actual disease
[33:07] like what does that mean?
[33:08] >> It's a disorder that disease kind of
[33:10] difference.
[33:11] >> Okay. Disorder.
[33:12] >> But but even a disorder by whose
[33:15] standards? By society standards, it
[33:17] wants you to have a boring ass job that
[33:19] you don't like or concentrate in boring
[33:22] ass classes that you're not enjoying. He
[33:24] can't concentrate. He's got ADD. The
[33:26] [ __ ] class is boring. I bet if you
[33:28] get that kid in front of a video game,
[33:29] he can concentrate like a [ __ ]
[33:31] They probably they probably call it a
[33:32] disorder because most people don't have
[33:34] that problem.
[33:36] >> I don't think most people don't have it.
[33:37] I think a lot of people have it. Yeah. I
[33:38] think if you go to the doctor, they'll
[33:39] tell you you have it.
[33:40] >> Like even the kids that was get their
[33:42] ass beat, they still can't focus. Like,
[33:44] you know, they call they let your mama
[33:46] come in class and watch you.
[33:48] >> Yeah. But they're just bored, man.
[33:49] They're bored. It's not a disease. If
[33:51] you give those kids something they like,
[33:53] like it's a game that they like. I bet
[33:55] if there's a sport they like to do, I
[33:57] bet they love that. I bet they're like
[33:59] focused on that. Oh yeah,
[34:00] >> school is [ __ ] boring. It's boring
[34:03] and it's frustrating for children that
[34:05] are filled with energy to have to sit
[34:07] down.
[34:07] >> I remember this guy um I used to listen
[34:10] to what was his name? Tom Hartman, I
[34:12] think. But he he I remember hearing him
[34:13] talk about a school they they had way
[34:16] back in the day in the Northeast that
[34:17] would like before they started calling
[34:19] it ADHD, but they would go get these
[34:22] kids that couldn't focus and they would
[34:24] put them all in this one school and they
[34:26] taught completely differently. like they
[34:27] would let you they would let them kind
[34:30] of just do like if they had a question
[34:32] that's when they would learn whatever
[34:34] they needed to learn to answer that
[34:35] question. They didn't it wasn't like a
[34:38] super structured curriculum. So they got
[34:40] to only do what they were interested in
[34:42] and they would have to learn the basics
[34:45] >> before they could you know finish
[34:46] whatever they were actually interested
[34:48] in.
[34:48] >> And it worked out and I don't know why I
[34:50] forget why it ended up getting shut down
[34:51] but it was almost like Professor X's
[34:53] academy. you know, they would go find
[34:55] these weird kids and bring them all to
[34:57] this one place.
[34:58] >> But that, like you said, it doesn't fit
[35:00] into the standardized,
[35:02] >> you know, school isn't for you to
[35:03] [ __ ] get smart. It's it's to teach
[35:04] you how to be a worker.
[35:06] >> Exactly. And it was developed by the
[35:07] Rockefellers for that specific reason.
[35:10] >> Really?
[35:10] >> Yeah. It was engineered to turn you into
[35:12] a worker. It's not to educate you the
[35:15] most effective way possible. It's to
[35:16] make sure that you can get a job.
[35:19] >> It's like they just want to turn you
[35:20] into someone they can use. And well then
[35:22] now they shipping all the jobs overseas.
[35:24] >> The problem with whenever the
[35:26] pharmaceutical drug companies are
[35:28] involved, they have such a grip on the
[35:30] media and such a grip on the medical
[35:32] establishment. There's so much money
[35:33] involved. They will come up with
[35:35] disorders that they need to medicate you
[35:38] for because they're extremely
[35:40] profitable. And that's the problem.
[35:42] >> Yeah. Yeah. I mean, but that's every
[35:43] industry.
[35:44] >> But it doesn't mean Adderall is not
[35:45] awesome. I bet it's great. This is like
[35:47] I feel like the world is just a a series
[35:50] of scams.
[35:52] >> It's like whatever scam are you are you
[35:54] in on, right?
[35:55] >> Yeah. Yeah. I mean, everything's kind of
[35:57] a scam.
[35:58] >> No, not everything. Yeah.
[36:01] >> Farms aren't a scam.
[36:03] >> Scammers.
[36:04] >> You give people money, they give you
[36:05] eggs. That's not a scam. There's a lot
[36:06] of things that aren't scams.
[36:09] >> I mean, yeah. Yeah. I guess I mean,
[36:11] listen, if you could buy eggs directly
[36:13] from the farmer, then you not you're not
[36:14] getting scammed. The thing about money
[36:16] and power is that at the highest levels,
[36:19] like when you get into government, when
[36:20] you get into enormous enormous
[36:22] corporations that can affect government,
[36:24] then you're going to get a lot of scams
[36:26] because they're just trying to make as
[36:27] much money as possible.
[36:30] >> That's the problem.
[36:30] >> Like I don't think I don't think it was
[36:32] ever intended for for like for
[36:35] politician to be like your job for
[36:37] senator to be like a lifetime
[36:39] >> lifetime crazy. And then all of a sudden
[36:41] you you have hundreds of millions of
[36:43] dollars through a method no one could
[36:45] really explain why you're so good at the
[36:47] stock market.
[36:48] >> Yeah. And all your and and if I just if
[36:50] I just follow all your mirror all your
[36:52] stock trades perfectly.
[36:53] >> Yeah.
[36:54] >> Yeah. Regardless of party somehow I get
[36:57] >> You ever talked to D. Rosa about it?
[36:58] >> No.
[36:59] >> D Rosa used to work for the Senate in
[37:00] Texas and he's got crazy stories. Crazy
[37:03] stories about how much money these
[37:04] people are getting. donations and this
[37:06] and that and go and do this and go and
[37:08] do that and getting paid to do this and
[37:10] paid to do that. That's most of what
[37:12] their job is is fundraising and
[37:14] collecting money from people.
[37:17] >> Oh yeah. And I and I made the mistake of
[37:19] cuz I you know I never give politicians
[37:22] money like ever. It just doesn't make
[37:25] sense to me to give a rich [ __ ]
[37:26] money. Like I need your money. I need
[37:28] money, right? I need you to go get me.
[37:30] But I I don't donate to them hardly
[37:32] ever. And I made the mistake. I sent a
[37:34] politician money recently and I and and
[37:37] then they just they just never stop
[37:38] asking
[37:40] >> just every week like you as soon as you
[37:42] put your email down they just from every
[37:45] week they're like guys we need I just
[37:48] need one more dollar. I was like I'm not
[37:49] giving you no [ __ ] money.
[37:51] >> They were trying to they were trying to
[37:53] raise money for the Democratic party
[37:54] right after Kamla lost.
[37:58] >> They were sending out emails. Well, they
[38:00] they're they're always all in constant.
[38:02] That's why that's why that's why the the
[38:05] political parties need to constantly
[38:07] keep you scared
[38:09] because that's the only way they can
[38:11] make sure you give them money. They tell
[38:12] you the sky is falling. If hey, if we
[38:14] can't defeat them, it's the end of the
[38:15] world.
[38:16] >> Yeah.
[38:17] >> Yeah. It's a dirty business, man.
[38:19] >> Yeah. There's people there's people that
[38:20] are that are struggling that are still
[38:22] giving politicians money. Have you seen
[38:25] those people that aren't really giving
[38:27] politicians money, but they're listed as
[38:29] giving politicians money and they think
[38:32] it's like NGO money that they've
[38:33] funneled money through you pretending
[38:36] that these people are donating money and
[38:38] so they can use NGO money and then
[38:42] funnel it into these political parties
[38:44] and uh then they knock on these people's
[38:46] doors and they say, "Hey, did you donate
[38:48] $25,000 to the Democratic Party?" And
[38:51] they're like, "No." like I have $25,000
[38:54] but they donated at one point in time
[38:56] many many years ago. So they have their
[38:58] name on a list non-governmental
[39:00] organization. So this is one of the
[39:02] things that uh Doge when Elon came in
[39:05] and like cleaned up all this US aid
[39:08] stuff. This is part of what was going on
[39:10] as a lot of it is just money laundering.
[39:12] You're taking a bunch of government
[39:14] funds and you have all these different
[39:16] non-government organizations that get
[39:18] money from the government and then the
[39:20] money is moving in this very cyclical
[39:22] way. And one of the ways they think they
[39:25] were doing it was finding a bunch of
[39:27] people on these lists of people that had
[39:29] donated before and then attributing
[39:30] money to them that they never donated.
[39:32] >> So if you give them if you gave them $5,
[39:34] they would say you gave $100.
[39:35] >> Well, they weren't even given any money,
[39:36] but they were using because they they
[39:38] don't get like a receipt. So they just
[39:40] said, "Oh, Billy Smith donated $25,000."
[39:44] And then they knock on Billy Smith's
[39:45] door. Did you donate $25,000 to the
[39:47] Republicans? Like [ __ ] no. What are
[39:49] you talking about? So they were just
[39:51] using the fact that they had this guy on
[39:53] a list. They had all this money that
[39:55] Elon was talking about. Billions and
[39:57] billions and billions of dollars that
[39:58] was written that they have no receipts
[40:00] for. They have no idea where it went.
[40:02] And some of that is like moving around.
[40:05] Some of it's going to Ukraine. I bet you
[40:07] that [ __ ] got a rude awakening
[40:08] cuz I actually I remember talking to you
[40:10] about this spec on here about when he
[40:12] first started doing it. I was like as
[40:14] soon as he started [ __ ] with that
[40:15] real money, he going to be up out of
[40:16] there.
[40:17] >> Oh yeah.
[40:17] >> I thought it was going to happen when he
[40:18] went to the Pentagon, but it's like as
[40:20] soon as you start you can't you're not
[40:22] allowed to [ __ ] with the real scams,
[40:24] right?
[40:24] >> You can do the surface stuff. You can do
[40:26] stuff that helps poor people, but you
[40:29] can't if you start [ __ ] with rich
[40:30] people money, they going to get your ass
[40:32] gone. Well, he was saying that when you
[40:33] get into like the Medicaid fraud, he was
[40:36] legitimately worried that he was going
[40:37] to get killed because there was so much
[40:40] money. There's so much fraud.
[40:41] >> You know, you don't hear him talking
[40:42] about that [ __ ] no more, do you?
[40:44] >> Well, you know what? It cost his company
[40:46] a lot of money. It cost his political
[40:49] reputation. There was a lot a lot of
[40:52] people turned on him after that where he
[40:53] was like a free speech freedom fighter
[40:56] before that. And, you know, and this guy
[40:58] who was just like, you know, people
[41:00] loved him. They they they love the fact
[41:02] that he's he's our modern-day Nicola
[41:04] Tesla. He's the guy who's making
[41:06] electric cars and rockets and all these
[41:08] different things.
[41:09] >> Yeah. I I I think that he's going to
[41:11] learn like getting in getting in bed
[41:14] with politicians is going to always [ __ ]
[41:16] you over
[41:17] >> because they use people. They don't give
[41:19] a They're not your friends. They're not
[41:20] That's true.
[41:21] >> Yeah. As soon as you ain't useful no
[41:22] more, they throw you in the [ __ ]
[41:23] trash.
[41:24] >> But if you don't get in bed with them,
[41:26] somebody else does and then you get
[41:28] [ __ ] And that's what people get
[41:29] scared of. They're like, "Well, listen,
[41:31] there's a reality here. I if I can
[41:34] affect it in a positive way, I probably
[41:36] should." And uh the US A thing was wild
[41:39] because, you know, you think of us a you
[41:41] think of it, you ever you know who Mike
[41:43] Benz is?
[41:44] >> No.
[41:44] >> I'll send you some [ __ ] if you're
[41:46] interested, but he's the most he's done
[41:48] the most extensive work on US aid. And
[41:50] what he basically said was US aid was
[41:52] for things that were too dirty for the
[41:54] CIA. And a lot of it is regime change
[41:57] overseas. So you think of US aid as aid,
[42:00] right?
[42:00] >> Right.
[42:00] >> It's not. It's agency for international
[42:03] development. It's a regime change
[42:06] organization.
[42:07] It funds rebel groups in other
[42:09] countries. It funds rebel groups.
[42:11] >> It's like a It's a front.
[42:13] >> It's a front. Yeah. And it's not just
[42:15] one front. USA funds who knows how many
[42:18] NOS's. Who knows how many
[42:20] non-governmental organizations? India
[42:23] has some [ __ ] insane number of NOS.
[42:27] The number of NOS's are so crazy. It's
[42:29] like one forever million people in India
[42:31] and there's a billion people in India.
[42:32] So it might be crazier than that. It's
[42:34] crazy how many NOS's are. So there's so
[42:37] many companies. It's or so many
[42:38] non-government organizations. It's so
[42:40] hard to keep track of it all. Again, I'm
[42:42] butchering this. I don't have the facts
[42:43] available at my fingertips, but I could
[42:45] send you some of the Mike Ben stuff.
[42:46] >> The purpose of the NGO is to funnel
[42:48] money.
[42:49] >> Funnel money.
[42:50] >> Okay.
[42:50] >> Not always. I mean, some of them are
[42:52] sure I'm sure actual charities. There's
[42:54] good people out there that are involved
[42:55] in charities. You know, there's there's
[42:57] good organizations. Uh Sea Sheeperds,
[42:59] awesome. They're awesome.
[43:00] >> What do they do?
[43:01] >> Those are the people that are trying to
[43:01] prevent whailing. They're trying to bust
[43:03] people whailing because like um some
[43:06] countries there's a way they can get
[43:07] around whaling by saying it's for
[43:09] research. I think Japan does that and
[43:11] they bust them and then they using them
[43:13] commercially. They they kill whales and
[43:16] these guys do a great job. I mean,
[43:18] there's there's there's real charitable
[43:20] organizations that are real doing real
[43:23] philanthropy. the real good people out
[43:25] there. But then there's also scumbags
[43:27] and they realize that there's a lot of
[43:28] this money flowing around, you know, for
[43:31] aid. That's what you kept hearing. Oh,
[43:33] these children are starving. Listen,
[43:35] man. You need to look at what the real
[43:37] money was going towards. And you'd freak
[43:39] out. You'd freak out.
[43:41] >> A lot of his regime change.
[43:43] >> You seen that meme with a guy that was
[43:44] like, "Corruption is not bad and only
[43:48] when I am not involved." You know what
[43:50] I'm talking about?
[43:53] >> No. He's like, "What's that mean?"
[43:55] >> No. No. I I don't even I don't think he
[43:58] was a famous dictator or whatever. He
[43:59] just he was like this African
[44:00] politician. He was just saying just
[44:02] telling people on the news like
[44:03] corruption is not bad.
[44:05] >> Let me hear this dude.
[44:08] >> Yes.
[44:09] >> Let me hear it.
[44:10] >> Start it over.
[44:10] >> If I'm part of that corruption, I
[44:13] corruption is not bad.
[44:15] Corruption is only bad if I'm not
[44:18] involved.
[44:19] >> Yes.
[44:21] But if I'm part of that corruption, I'll
[44:23] defend it.
[44:24] >> Okay, he's not talking about him. I
[44:26] guarantee you that guy is talking about
[44:28] people who are corrupt who defend
[44:29] corruption. I think they're taking him
[44:31] out of context. I don't think he's
[44:32] really saying that that hard.
[44:33] >> You know what's funny? I've actually
[44:34] never looked into it.
[44:35] >> If I thought about that, I that guy
[44:37] doesn't look like a scumbag. The way
[44:39] he's saying it to me, just my instinct,
[44:41] I could be wrong.
[44:42] >> Who is Who is he, Jeremy? You know,
[44:43] >> watch him. He's a massive thief. Totally
[44:46] wrong. human rights activist Samsona
[44:50] Oay.
[44:51] >> Thank you.
[44:52] >> But did what was the what's the context
[44:55] of that quote?
[44:57] >> Listen, he's a human rights activist.
[44:58] Let's leave it at that. Let's move on.
[45:00] >> Longer speech.
[45:01] >> Yes.
[45:02] >> He used irony. Thank you. Exaggerated
[45:04] rhetoric to criticize self- serving
[45:06] attitudes towards corruption. That's
[45:07] what I thought. That's what I thought
[45:09] immediately by the way he was saying it.
[45:10] My instincts.
[45:12] >> Damn. Okay, you called it.
[45:14] >> Yeah. I was like, that guy does not seem
[45:15] like a scumbag. That guy seems like a
[45:17] guy who's fed up with corruption. The
[45:19] way he's saying it is not like I am
[45:21] corrupt, you give me the money. That's
[45:23] not how he's saying it.
[45:24] >> What he was saying was it's people will
[45:26] defend corruption if they're involved.
[45:29] And I think he's right.
[45:31] >> Yeah. I think that's
[45:32] >> Yeah. The thing is that's basically how
[45:34] it go.
[45:34] >> It's motivations, man. And when you see
[45:36] people getting rich around you, you see
[45:38] all these other politicians that are
[45:40] getting [ __ ] filthy stinking rich and
[45:42] you are struggling to pay your mortgage
[45:44] and you're struggling to put your kids
[45:46] into a good school system. You're
[45:47] struggling to make your [ __ ] lease on
[45:49] this nice car that you get to drive.
[45:51] You're struggling and then you see these
[45:53] other [ __ ] and you go, "Well,
[45:54] it's not it's kind of good anyway and
[45:56] bad. I'll get the good done. I'll do a
[45:59] little bit of I'll shenanigans, but but
[46:01] we'll we'll get it. It's good for the
[46:03] district." The next thing you know, you
[46:05] got a corporation in. They're union
[46:07] busting and
[46:08] >> Yeah. And you you're walking out of a
[46:10] room in Epstein's house. He's like,
[46:12] "She's 12. We got you on tape. We need
[46:15] this and this and this past or not even
[46:18] 12 is just someone other than your wife,
[46:21] you know, or someone who you talk to,
[46:25] you know, that you didn't realize was a
[46:27] Russian spy and you are some sort of a
[46:29] politician. You're bragging." That's one
[46:31] thing they catch. Well, that that James
[46:33] O'Keefe guy.
[46:34] >> I don't know who that is.
[46:36] >> Damn, Brian, you're so uninformed.
[46:38] >> Yeah, man. I know. I really I mind my
[46:41] business on a level that you wouldn't
[46:42] believe.
[46:43] >> Oh, I know. I like it. I like I like
[46:45] that you like that.
[46:46] >> Yeah. I mean, I cuz And also, you know
[46:49] what it is? It keeps me having fresh
[46:52] like it keeps me having uncorrupted
[46:54] takes cuz so much now when you get told
[46:57] the news, you also get told how you're
[46:59] supposed to feel about it,
[47:00] >> right? But that's how you were about US
[47:02] A and RFK Jr.
[47:04] >> Yeah.
[47:04] >> Do you know who Fang Fang is, Brian?
[47:07] >> No.
[47:08] >> You know,
[47:08] >> Fang Fang is the lady that was banging
[47:11] the guy who wanted to be the governor of
[47:14] California.
[47:16] >> You don't know that whole scandal?
[47:17] >> No. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Wait a
[47:18] minute. That's the lady that
[47:20] >> she was a Chinese spy.
[47:21] >> Her husband died and she went back to
[47:22] China.
[47:24] >> No, that's Mitch McConnell. And he's not
[47:26] even dead. He's alive.
[47:27] >> [ __ ] dead. He dead.
[47:29] >> He's alive. And there's photos of him
[47:31] holding a newspaper.
[47:32] >> Look at me. The newspaper today. This is
[47:34] today's newspaper.
[47:36] >> We watched him. We I watched him die
[47:38] halfway in a news conference.
[47:40] >> Did you see the video of him sitting on
[47:41] the Senate floor not moving at all for
[47:43] hours and hours and hours at a time
[47:46] while everybody's moving around him?
[47:47] >> No.
[47:47] >> I sent you that, right?
[47:48] >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
[47:49] >> Watch this. This is crazy. He's on the
[47:52] Senate floor for 20 hours.
[47:55] >> Well,
[47:55] >> and there's like six hours of him
[47:58] motionless. Yeah, I think the whole
[47:59] thing was only an 18 hour event, so I
[48:01] don't
[48:01] >> Okay, whatever it is, 18 hours. He's
[48:04] motionless, bro. I can't
[48:05] >> sleep.
[48:06] >> He's dead.
[48:07] >> Oh,
[48:07] >> it's weekend at Bernie's. They They just
[48:10] fired him up with cocaine and sit there.
[48:12] >> He's back.
[48:13] >> No, no, no, no. This is old video.
[48:14] >> Okay.
[48:15] >> So, this is video before he completely
[48:16] shortcircuited,
[48:17] >> but it's crazy to watch cuz I can't do
[48:21] what he's doing. What he's doing is like
[48:23] some Zen monk master [ __ ] where he's
[48:25] like sitting in a position and not
[48:27] moving a muscle for hours and hours at a
[48:29] time where everybody's like moving
[48:30] around and moving back and forth and
[48:31] left and right. He's not moving. Look,
[48:34] watch this. Look at him.
[48:36] >> That's only just a clip of it, but
[48:39] >> he just sits.
[48:40] >> Also, the guy next to him is just
[48:41] sitting there with him and doesn't
[48:42] >> Yeah, at least that guy's moving his
[48:43] [ __ ] head. Barely. McConnell's not
[48:45] moving at all,
[48:47] >> dude. It's bizarre. It's bizarre. He's
[48:50] frozen. Look at him.
[48:53] I feel like the dude beside him is the
[48:54] one that's that
[48:55] >> look at that
[48:56] >> pushing a button to make him rate vote.
[48:58] Yeah, they
[48:59] >> uh speaking of the voting, he did make a
[49:00] vote at the end of this.
[49:02] >> Apparently made the wrong vote. Someone
[49:03] noticed he made the wrong vote. They
[49:05] they like
[49:06] >> fixed his vote.
[49:06] >> Yeah, they told his handler and then he
[49:08] fixed his vote.
[49:10] >> Like it was like a thumbs up and then as
[49:11] he's walking away is like thumbs down
[49:13] and then he keeps walking away.
[49:17] >> They don't want to let it go, man.
[49:18] >> None of them do.
[49:19] >> It's great. Who was the last Who was the
[49:21] last one they weekended Bernie's? Was it
[49:24] >> Diane Feinstein?
[49:25] >> Feinstein.
[49:25] >> Yeah. She was in a wheelchair. Didn't
[49:27] know where she was.
[49:28] >> And they're like, "You want to vote?"
[49:30] Yes.
[49:30] >> She looked she looked worse than him.
[49:32] >> Well, she at least can move around
[49:34] >> like towards the end.
[49:36] >> And then they and then Ruth Gate Ruth
[49:38] Bader Ginsburg
[49:40] like I wonder what what it is about
[49:42] because that's why power is so scary to
[49:44] me because it's like they want it. They
[49:46] can't give it up to the last drop.
[49:48] >> Yeah. It's identity. It's your identity.
[49:51] It's who you think you are. You're the
[49:53] senator. You're the distinguished
[49:54] senator from South Carolina or wherever
[49:56] you're from.
[49:57] >> Can't you But you already rich. Ain't
[49:59] you tired? Don't you want to go play
[50:01] with your grandb babies?
[50:01] >> No. And they never feel rich enough.
[50:03] That's the other thing about trying to
[50:05] get rich. You never You get accustomed
[50:07] to whatever level you're at and you want
[50:08] to keep leveling up.
[50:09] >> I mean, cuz once you at the point where
[50:10] you're a senator, you can pretty much do
[50:12] whatever you want to do.
[50:14] >> You mean moneywise? Not if you're clean.
[50:16] >> Well Well, I mean, you have a lot of
[50:17] power. You have enough power where you
[50:18] can do most things. I mean, you know.
[50:20] >> Yeah. But the clean ones don't really
[50:22] have a lot of money.
[50:23] >> The clean ones.
[50:24] >> The clean ones. The ones who aren't
[50:26] doing the insider trading.
[50:27] >> There ain't no clean ones.
[50:28] >> There's a few.
[50:29] >> There's a bunch of people that you can
[50:31] there's fun you can find lists of them
[50:32] online where they are not participating
[50:34] in any of that. And then you look at
[50:35] their income. You look at their wealth.
[50:36] They're not worth a lot of money.
[50:38] >> They they live senators. They live like
[50:40] a person who makes $170,000 a year,
[50:42] which is good living,
[50:43] >> but that's how they live.
[50:45] >> All right. I'm going to look I want to
[50:46] see that list. I I want to know who it
[50:48] is.
[50:49] >> I don't I'm not going to
[50:50] >> Tim Burett. Isn't he one of them?
[50:53] >> I don't know who's
[50:54] >> I don't think he's ever been accused of
[50:56] any of that.
[50:57] >> There's a bunch of these people that are
[50:58] clean and it's Look, man, it's just it's
[51:01] such a dirty business.
[51:02] >> See, I bet you there's a is a
[51:04] correlation between the people that are
[51:06] clean and the people that have haven't
[51:08] been doing it for that long,
[51:10] >> you know? I think if you if you stick
[51:11] around once you start getting them
[51:13] committees and because that's the real
[51:14] power. Once you start being on these
[51:16] committees and being a chair and this
[51:18] and that and you start
[51:19] >> because that's when you deal directly
[51:21] with industries and they start bribing
[51:23] you and [ __ ]
[51:24] >> Yeah. And then there's also this thing
[51:26] where you retire and you go work for
[51:27] them.
[51:28] >> Yeah. You So you and you don't they
[51:29] ain't letting you get they ain't letting
[51:31] no new people get committees.
[51:33] >> That's true.
[51:33] >> N no no no.
[51:35] >> So it's like what they not letting you
[51:36] they not letting you near any of the
[51:38] real power unless you play ball.
[51:40] >> Exactly. You know, either you doing this
[51:42] corruption or we got you on tape doing
[51:43] something you but you you ain't
[51:46] >> Yeah. We're all dirty. So we Yeah.
[51:48] That's why every time like regardless
[51:50] how much they fight in public, Democrats
[51:52] and Republicans, every time it's time to
[51:53] get a self a raise, they all vote yes.
[51:55] It's never no filibuster. It's never no
[51:57] controversy, right?
[51:58] >> They all like, well, I'll take a little
[52:00] more money.
[52:00] >> Right. Well, that's also why they
[52:02] haven't stopped this insider trading
[52:03] thing
[52:04] >> because they're both doing it.
[52:05] >> It's why they won't release the Epstein
[52:06] files. It's why they won't tell us who
[52:08] Cha Kennedy somebody because it only the
[52:11] things that [ __ ] it's it's it's it's
[52:13] also why they have this like blind
[52:17] uh support of Israel, you know, cuz like
[52:19] they and they know why
[52:21] >> they're getting paid.
[52:22] >> They're getting paid.
[52:24] >> Yeah.
[52:24] >> Paid
[52:24] >> or blackmailed.
[52:26] >> Paid or blackmailed or both. Paid.
[52:28] Blackma mailed or both. Or there's
[52:31] there's a lot of those kooky
[52:33] fundamentalist Christians that have an
[52:34] allegiance to Israel because they think
[52:37] Jesus is going to come back there.
[52:38] >> Oh, I guess I didn't think about that.
[52:39] >> Oh, there's a ton of them. There's a ton
[52:41] of them Mike Huckabe type characters.
[52:44] >> Weren't you telling me something about
[52:45] the Old Testament when I walked in?
[52:46] >> We were talking Jamie was bringing up
[52:48] something about Moses. We're going to
[52:49] bring that up.
[52:51] >> Yeah. Um,
[52:53] >> it was just like following the story of
[52:55] I guess it'd be like literally following
[52:57] the story and just sort of like, you
[52:58] know, putting it through a filter about
[53:00] things I know or we know now. Damn, I
[53:03] lost it. Hold on a second. Um, but like
[53:05] yeah, I guess what do you know about
[53:06] that story off the gate?
[53:09] >> Which part of the story you were talking
[53:10] about? The ten commandments.
[53:11] >> Well, how Moses found that's Moses in
[53:14] the burning bush is Exodus 3. I guess
[53:15] that's how it's like titled. So that's
[53:17] where he finds the Ten Commandments. So
[53:19] he sees a burning bush or a bush that is
[53:22] burning and not burning up, you know,
[53:24] like not being
[53:27] uh
[53:27] >> consumed by the fire.
[53:28] >> Correct. And then an angel of God speaks
[53:32] to him, tells him to take off his shoes
[53:33] because he's on holy ground. Uh and then
[53:36] depending on which reading of the Bible
[53:38] translation you're finding, he either
[53:40] finds the tablets
[53:42] or they're like presented to him or
[53:45] something. He then takes the tablets
[53:47] down off of the mountain, sees the
[53:49] people worshiping a golden calf, breaks
[53:52] the tablets, then they have to go make
[53:54] them again.
[53:56] And this is where I started getting in
[53:57] this place of where I was like re
[53:59] researching like language and cunia form
[54:01] and whatnot. I'm like how many people
[54:03] back then knew actually how to write
[54:06] read and then how like he the other like
[54:10] we've gone on sidet tracks with it might
[54:11] be an acacia bush and he might have been
[54:13] you know high on DMT or something like
[54:15] that.
[54:15] >> Oh he was probably high
[54:16] >> and so like it says he found them. So
[54:18] like did what did he find? And
[54:20] >> I think that's where they come from a
[54:21] big part of a lot of these ancient
[54:23] religious stories. And the there's a a
[54:26] bunch of scholars out of the University
[54:28] of Jerusalem that they they first came
[54:30] up with this theory that the acacia
[54:32] tree, the burning bush, was in fact a
[54:35] psychedelic plant. And this like what
[54:37] happens when you smoke DMT? You have
[54:39] crazy experiences and visions. You meet
[54:41] entities.
[54:43] And this is probably what he probably
[54:45] got a giant dose of DMT from a burning
[54:48] bush.
[54:50] >> Yeah, I think that that's also Didn't
[54:51] Joseph Smith also find some tablets?
[54:53] >> Yeah.
[54:55] >> I think see I'm always fascinated by
[54:57] people like the people that have founded
[54:59] religions and stuff because it's like
[55:02] how charismatic do you have to be for
[55:03] people to to buy that? For you to like
[55:05] go in the woods and come back and go,
[55:07] "Hey, I spoke to God and this he told me
[55:10] this was all the rules." It's not me
[55:12] saying it. It's like cuz you cuz think
[55:14] about who you would believe that would
[55:16] say that today.
[55:17] >> A good day starts with a solid morning
[55:19] routine. So if something's missing, if
[55:21] your body isn't getting what it needs,
[55:22] everything can feel off. AG1 is designed
[55:26] to help fill the holes. Their NextG
[55:29] formula is dialed in with over 75
[55:31] ingredients, minerals, vitamins,
[55:34] adaptogens, and more. Clinically shown
[55:36] to fill nutrient gaps and increase
[55:39] healthy gut bacteria. And AG1 Pro takes
[55:43] it even further. It has CAHMBB for
[55:46] muscle protection, zinc carnosine for
[55:50] gut health, and 5 grams of creatalis
[55:53] premium Germanmade creatine monohydrate,
[55:56] which if you don't know, creatine is a
[55:59] highly studied compound in sports
[56:01] science that helps support energy. Get
[56:04] more from your morning routine. Add
[56:07] either AG1 NextG or AG1 Pro and your
[56:12] body will thank you. Go to drink
[56:14] AG1.com/jo
[56:17] and for a limited time save 20% on your
[56:19] first subscription order of AG1 NextGen
[56:22] or AG1 Pro. That's drinkagg.com/jo.
[56:27] But that's me and you. Okay. And I think
[56:30] you and I are not high trust
[56:32] individuals.
[56:33] >> We are not we don't immediately trust
[56:35] authority. We're we're reluctant to
[56:37] believe people. We're very skeptical.
[56:40] You you tell me something wacky, I'm
[56:42] like, "Wait, what happened? Where were
[56:44] you? You you found a bush. The bush was
[56:46] on fire. Shut the [ __ ] up."
[56:47] >> Especially if you start asking me for
[56:48] money,
[56:49] >> right? But there's a lot of people that
[56:51] they're not confident at all. And
[56:53] they're very easily uh persuaded. And
[56:57] those people fall in line like people
[56:59] that fall into cults like the cult that
[57:02] owned the building that uh I almost
[57:04] bought that one world theater that have
[57:06] you ever watched that documentary?
[57:08] >> That guy I mean he was he was basically
[57:10] an obvious kook. He was a gay porn star
[57:13] and a hypnotist and developed this cult
[57:16] out of his yoga students. And if you
[57:18] ever taken yoga before very it gets very
[57:20] culty. There's a lot of people that are
[57:22] teaching the yoga that they they look
[57:25] there's yoga teachers that are very cool
[57:27] and just really cool peaceful spiritual
[57:30] people that really enjoy teaching yoga
[57:32] and making people's lives better for
[57:33] sure. But there's also people that get
[57:35] into a position of power like being the
[57:37] spiritual leader of a yoga class and
[57:40] then they start abusing that power.
[57:41] That's the story of like Berram like if
[57:43] you you know you ever watch the
[57:45] documentary on that guy that did
[57:47] Beerram's yoga? He's [ __ ] everybody.
[57:49] He was a wild dude. He had Rolls-Royces.
[57:51] Like he was living like like a
[57:53] psychopath. And it's all cult stuff.
[57:56] It's like you have that kind of power
[57:57] over these people.
[57:58] >> Was he also [ __ ] people's wives?
[58:00] >> I'm sure he was cuz that feels like a
[58:01] No, but I mean it feels like that's a
[58:03] through line.
[58:04] >> Oh yeah.
[58:04] >> In a lot of cults. At some point he's
[58:07] like um I'm supposed to be [ __ ] your
[58:08] wife.
[58:08] >> God told me I get to [ __ ] your wife.
[58:10] Yeah.
[58:11] >> And
[58:13] there's a surprising amount of comics
[58:15] that were raised in cults or escaped
[58:18] cults. Kurt Matzer.
[58:20] >> Yeah,
[58:21] >> Kurt Mater, Abby Roge,
[58:24] um um I forget her name is there's a
[58:26] girl at the mothership
[58:28] >> that they Yeah, it's like I've met I
[58:31] probably met like maybe five or six
[58:32] comics that were like, "Oh yeah, I was
[58:33] in a cult."
[58:34] >> Makes sense. Well, Ari was uh Orthodox
[58:38] Jewish like heavily like studying the
[58:41] Torah 12 hours a day, like the whole
[58:42] deal. Lived in Israel in a kabutz like
[58:45] he did the whole deal.
[58:46] >> Wait a minute. Who?
[58:47] >> Ari Shafir. Oh,
[58:49] >> Ari Shafir was deeply religious. Deeply,
[58:52] deeply religious. And then
[58:54] >> like he got older. He got into his like
[58:56] early 20s like what the this is [ __ ]
[58:58] nonsense. Like what the [ __ ] are we
[59:00] doing? And then he became a comic. Like
[59:03] did a full 180.
[59:06] >> Yeah. I mean that's a [ __ ]
[59:07] that's going to do whatever he want to
[59:08] do.
[59:09] >> Yes. Well, especially what he's been
[59:11] through with, you know, being in that
[59:15] religious envir like hyper religious
[59:16] environment. He is just completely
[59:20] allergic to any rules, any any
[59:23] authority, any people telling people
[59:24] what to do and how to behave and how to
[59:26] think. [ __ ] you. He's just he has none
[59:28] of that in him.
[59:29] >> Well, this is the truth, man. This was
[59:31] just what I found is that most of the
[59:32] time the people telling you how you
[59:34] supposed to live, it's like people that
[59:35] make it their whole personality to tell
[59:37] other people how to live, they usually
[59:38] are living like [ __ ] They doing some
[59:40] shady [ __ ]
[59:42] >> almost every time.
[59:43] >> It's definitely that. And then there's
[59:44] another thing that happens with people
[59:46] that don't have kids in particularly and
[59:48] it happens with uh I mean I don't want
[59:51] to generalize but it seems like it's
[59:53] Republicans too but it's a lot of
[59:54] liberal women. Liberal women with no
[59:56] children want to turn the world into
[59:58] their children. They want to like scold
[60:02] the world like they're doing the wrong
[60:04] thing and they're they're worried about
[60:05] the environment and they're worried
[60:07] about the future and they're worried
[60:08] about voting and they're worried about
[60:09] rights and they're worried about the
[60:10] immigrants. They're worried about the
[60:11] this and they're worried about the that.
[60:13] They're taking care of the world like
[60:14] it's the child that they don't have.
[60:16] >> But those all sound like good things.
[60:17] >> Well, it depends on which which angle
[60:19] you're taking on any of these things,
[60:22] >> you know? I mean, you use those things
[60:24] as an excuse to be a [ __ ] then they're
[60:26] not good things, you know?
[60:28] >> Well, I just heard a lady talking about
[60:30] this. Um, she called it
[60:34] I don't want to [ __ ] it up. She called
[60:36] it um
[60:41] [ __ ] don't worry about it.
[60:44] >> That very same thing.
[60:46] >> No, but
[60:46] >> people that don't have children.
[60:48] >> No, no, no. It it she was talking more
[60:50] along the lines of like
[60:53] of of what of like cancel culture and
[60:56] what it's born out of. Um basically like
[61:00] defining yourself. She called it like
[61:01] slave morality or master master slave
[61:04] morality. She was saying like
[61:06] you the the ruling class traditionally
[61:09] defines themselves as like the way they
[61:12] behave as good and just like you know
[61:16] things like being beautiful and being
[61:17] successful and alo and then this the
[61:19] slave morality is defining yourself as
[61:21] not those things right like you're
[61:25] you're saying that like I'm a good
[61:26] person because I'm not those things
[61:28] >> and you have and then you have to uh see
[61:30] I'm going to [ __ ] this up you're going
[61:31] to have and then you have to
[61:34] >> demonst demonstrate their morality by by
[61:36] punishing people.
[61:37] >> It's a nichi thing that
[61:40] >> master and slave morality are two
[61:41] opposing value systems introduced by the
[61:43] philosopher Frederick Nichi in his 1887
[61:45] book on the genealogy of morality.
[61:48] Master morality is an active
[61:49] self-affirming value system created by
[61:51] the strong, wealthy, and ruling class.
[61:54] Definition of good. Masters look at
[61:56] themselves and define what is good based
[61:58] on their own traits such as strength,
[62:00] power, nobility, beauty, courage, and
[62:02] wealth. Definition of bad. Bad is simply
[62:04] a secondary descriptive term for what is
[62:06] common, plain, or low, not evil.
[62:09] Perspective, it's an inward-looking.
[62:12] It's inward-looking and focuses on
[62:14] action and achievement rather than
[62:16] reacting to others. Slave morality is
[62:18] reactive, defensive value system born
[62:21] from resentment.
[62:24] Resentment.
[62:27] Why does it say resentment? Is that how
[62:28] you say it?
[62:29] >> Deep seated resentment. Res.
[62:31] >> What is it? But it's what is resentment?
[62:33] Have you ever seen that word?
[62:35] >> Uh deep-seated resent. Oh, it's
[62:36] deep-seated resentment. It's deep
[62:38] resentment. Uh and powerlessness
[62:40] experienced by the oppressed or the
[62:42] herd. Definition of evil. Slaves begin
[62:45] by defining what they fear or cannot
[62:47] attain in their oppressors as evil. For
[62:50] example, power, pride, wealth, and
[62:53] strength. Definition of good. Good is
[62:55] created in reaction to evil. defined as
[62:58] the opposite of the master's traits.
[63:00] Praising, humility, meekness, obedience,
[63:03] empathy, and forgiveness. Well, the
[63:06] interesting thing is cancel culture does
[63:07] not have much forgiveness.
[63:09] >> No.
[63:09] >> Nor does it have empathy for opposing
[63:11] thoughts.
[63:12] >> No, but the woman I saw speaking, she
[63:13] goes into that about how like you you
[63:16] get to the point where because because
[63:19] human beings are all those things,
[63:21] right? It's like you you trying to
[63:23] define yourself as one or the other. it
[63:26] the you would you have to reinforce your
[63:29] morality by basically let me put it in
[63:31] my own words everyone is looking for a
[63:33] reason to be their worst self like
[63:35] you're looking for a reason to to be
[63:37] evil to like exercise your your
[63:40] nastiness and the way to do that is by
[63:42] defining someone else as bad so then you
[63:45] get to say you know I'm I'm it's like
[63:47] like normally I would never burn down
[63:49] somebody's house but they voted for such
[63:51] and such like normally I would never you
[63:53] know yell at someone's kids But they had
[63:56] this sticker on their car. It's like you
[63:57] you start having to define what other
[64:01] people are so that you can
[64:03] >> uh espouse your morality. You understand
[64:06] what I'm saying?
[64:06] >> Yeah.
[64:07] >> And it's weak people.
[64:09] >> We're all looking for No, I think it's I
[64:11] think it's just human nature. Like every
[64:12] >> Yeah. But that's a weakness to not to
[64:14] not be able to objectively look at why
[64:17] you're upset at things is a weakness.
[64:19] It's a psychological weakness. But we
[64:21] all have weak spots where there's things
[64:23] that you don't that you are not
[64:24] objective about.
[64:25] >> Sure.
[64:25] >> Like you have blind spots, you know?
[64:27] >> Yes.
[64:27] >> Or it's like you hear somebody died and
[64:30] the first thing you want to know is,
[64:31] well, how did they die?
[64:32] >> Right. Because you're trying to figure
[64:34] out, you're trying to You're looking for
[64:35] a reason to not care.
[64:36] >> No.
[64:37] >> Oh, yeah. Yeah.
[64:38] >> I don't do that.
[64:39] >> What if Okay, let me tell you something.
[64:40] What if I tell you
[64:41] >> I never look for a reason to not care.
[64:42] >> What if I tell you somebody died doing
[64:44] something stupid?
[64:46] >> Well, you know, people doing something
[64:48] stupid is stupid. I mean, it's not that
[64:50] I don't care. It's not like I'm looking
[64:52] for a reason to not care. But it's like
[64:54] I'm looking for a reason whether or not
[64:56] I should be really sad or really upset,
[64:58] >> right? Or you can go, well, you know,
[65:00] that's what like you maybe you're not
[65:02] looking for a reason to not care, but
[65:03] when you get one, you go, "Oh, thank
[65:05] God."
[65:06] >> You know, I don't have to like go
[65:08] through the emotions cuz that dude
[65:10] strapped itself to a rocket.
[65:11] >> Yeah. Well, there's always people like
[65:12] that. There's always people that do
[65:14] stupid [ __ ] that you don't feel bad for
[65:16] if they die. And interesting enough,
[65:18] it's more men than women.
[65:21] >> Yeah. Well, I never laugh when women
[65:22] die. Like, but men die. If men died
[65:25] doing something stupid, like a dude runs
[65:26] with the bulls and he gets a horn up his
[65:28] [ __ ] It's like, okay, bro.
[65:30] >> Yeah. I'm trying to think if I've ever
[65:32] >> What are you doing? Why are you doing
[65:33] that?
[65:33] >> If I've ever laughed at a woman dying.
[65:35] >> I feel bad when women die.
[65:37] >> I don't think so.
[65:40] >> Yeah, bro. I'm I have so like I was
[65:43] telling the homie yesterday but like I
[65:45] got the Captain Sabah ho gene from both
[65:47] sides. It's dominant. It's not
[65:48] recessive. I I'm such a soft like
[65:51] >> you're a compassionate person.
[65:52] >> Girl tears just I'm just like all right
[65:54] fine. Take it. Take whatever you want.
[65:56] >> You're a nice person.
[65:57] >> That's what it is. But but it can it can
[66:00] be manipulated with the wrong ladies.
[66:02] >> Yep. Facts. Facts.
[66:03] >> That's that's all it is. It's you just
[66:05] got to find a good woman and if you find
[66:08] just good people in general and then you
[66:10] won't be you don't have to worry about
[66:12] being manipulated because they're not
[66:13] trying to manipulate you. But you have
[66:14] to be manipulated a bunch of times to
[66:16] recognize the pattern
[66:17] >> and you go, "Okay,
[66:18] >> why is that?" Cuz I have definitely
[66:19] watched I have definitely watched videos
[66:21] of women getting hurt and laughed.
[66:24] >> Well, I watched this one Mexican lady
[66:25] lay some [ __ ] out on Sixth Street and
[66:27] I wanted to sign her for the UFC.
[66:29] >> Really?
[66:30] >> This chick had a [ __ ] hay maker,
[66:32] dude. She was wide and she gets in a
[66:35] brawl with these chicks. The shoes are
[66:37] off immediately and this girl's throwing
[66:39] bombs like Amanda Nunez right hands.
[66:42] Flatlining chicks. She filmed it. I
[66:44] didn't watch it personally. I'm never on
[66:46] Six Street. That was
[66:48] >> this one. Is it?
[66:49] >> No, no, no, no. This [ __ ] was stout.
[66:51] Those are white chicks. They can't
[66:52] fight. As soon as you see this, soon as
[66:54] you see the leaning back and the
[66:56] punching at the same time, nothing
[66:57] good's happening. This chick was tucking
[67:00] her chin and throwing like this. Boom. I
[67:03] mean, she was throwing power shots. She
[67:05] was flatlining chicks.
[67:06] >> Oh, this girl.
[67:07] >> Um, nope. That's not it. They're doing
[67:10] the same thing. See the leaning back?
[67:11] There's no power in leaning back. Yeah,
[67:12] she punched her in the nose. That's all
[67:14] that is.
[67:14] >> A good stance as you were saying.
[67:16] >> Yeah. Bad bad posture. Terrible form.
[67:19] This lady at one point in time, someone
[67:21] taught her how to punch or she's just a
[67:23] natural talent.
[67:24] >> Some people Yeah, some people have
[67:25] >> some people have natural talent.
[67:26] >> Yeah, cuz see that's the thing is like
[67:27] if they deserve it, I will I watch them
[67:29] get punched. Bro, my friend Tommy, my
[67:31] friend Tommy Jr., have you met him?
[67:32] Tommy?
[67:32] >> No.
[67:33] >> One of my oldest friends, he's been my
[67:34] friend for 35 years. He had this girl
[67:37] that he was dating for a while and he
[67:38] was always telling me uh she was like a
[67:41] strong girl. She worked out a lot. He's
[67:43] like, "Dude, she can punch, man. That
[67:44] [ __ ] machine, she can punch." And I
[67:46] go, "Really?" So, I'm I'm skeptical, but
[67:48] I'm open-minded. And uh I go, "How hard
[67:51] do you punch?" She goes She goes, "I
[67:52] punch [ __ ] hard." And I go, "Okay,
[67:54] hit my hand." And she hit my hand. I
[67:56] held my hand up and she [ __ ] cracked
[67:59] my hand to the point where like, "Oh,
[68:01] that could knock me out."
[68:02] >> Like, that could knock me out.
[68:03] >> I just found it right as you said hit my
[68:05] hand. I [ __ ] hit play on. Ah, damn
[68:07] it. I hit play on that one and that was
[68:08] it.
[68:08] >> Where is it?
[68:09] >> Uh, it's right here.
[68:12] >> Sensitive. Yep. That's her. No shoes.
[68:15] Bro. Bro, look at that punch. I'mma
[68:18] Watch this again. Watch this again. Back
[68:19] it up to the beginning.
[68:20] >> That's a part It's a
[68:22] >> It's a Instagram video. This chick.
[68:24] Okay. She's got sandals on. She's not
[68:25] barefoot.
[68:26] >> This is a This is earlier in the video.
[68:27] I think it starts off with the
[68:29] highlight, you know, and then,
[68:30] >> bro, you'll show Yeah, her do her shoes
[68:32] do come off, right?
[68:34] >> This chick can [ __ ] crack, dude.
[68:36] >> Yeah. Shout out to the Texas Street
[68:38] Fights guy.
[68:39] >> Try it. Watch it again.
[68:40] >> All right, here we go. Ready? Watch
[68:41] this.
[68:42] >> BOOM.
[68:43] >> OH MY GOD.
[68:44] >> SEE THE HIPS? See the hips in the
[68:46] shoulder?
[68:46] >> From now, every time I come on the
[68:48] podcast, I This is all I want to do.
[68:51] >> That girl can fight. That girl can Look
[68:53] at her throw that chick down. She's
[68:55] stout, too. Look at the ground and
[68:57] pound. Vicious. I mean, sign her up.
[69:00] >> That first punch was in incredible. And
[69:02] then the hip toss.
[69:03] >> A hammer, dude. She threw a hammer.
[69:06] >> All All body was into that. She pushed
[69:09] off her feet, everything. That was
[69:10] excellent. If I was her coach, I'd be
[69:12] like, "Fuck yeah, that was great."
[69:14] >> God damn.
[69:18] See, you got to be if you if you got if
[69:19] you hitting [ __ ] like that, you
[69:20] got to be careful, man, cuz you could
[69:21] kill somebody.
[69:22] >> Oh, 100%. You know,
[69:24] >> 100%.
[69:25] >> She's not even looking.
[69:27] >> Yeah, that girl's looking away, too.
[69:28] >> This [ __ ]
[69:29] >> She doesn't even She doesn't even know
[69:30] the fight started,
[69:31] >> bro. One more time. Give me ONE MORE
[69:33] TIME.
[69:33] >> BOOM.
[69:34] >> OH MY GOD.
[69:35] >> FLATLINE.
[69:36] >> YO, that's She Now, she definitely had a
[69:37] concussion. You watch. You saw her foot
[69:38] was moving.
[69:39] >> Not only that, her head bounced off the
[69:40] ground. That's the scary part.
[69:42] >> You [ __ ] around, man.
[69:43] >> The scary part is when the head bounces
[69:45] off the ground. That's when people die.
[69:47] >> I'm so glad I'm at that age now where I
[69:49] ain't trying to fight no [ __ ]
[69:50] body.
[69:51] >> Yeah, [ __ ] that.
[69:52] >> [ __ ] But you know when you when you
[69:54] young and when you're in your 20s and
[69:55] you're like [ __ ] what's up then
[69:58] >> that [ __ ] could go so many that [ __ ]
[70:00] could go wrong so many ways.
[70:01] >> I never got in fights. I got in a couple
[70:03] fights in high school. That's it. And
[70:05] before that I got in a couple fights. I
[70:07] very very few amount of street fights in
[70:09] my career.
[70:10] >> Yeah.
[70:11] >> Yeah. All organized. I've had a lot of
[70:12] organized fights. A lot of agreed to
[70:14] fights. I've had a lot of like matches
[70:16] where I knew I was preparing for and had
[70:18] fights. It's been a long The last time I
[70:20] got into a serious fight, man, it was
[70:23] when I was still uh I was still I was a
[70:27] door a door man at a at an Irish pub.
[70:31] >> Irish pubs are famous.
[70:33] >> And I remember this dude had um he
[70:37] he he came with he forgot his ID. Him
[70:42] and his girl came and she had her ID and
[70:43] he didn't have his. And and then he went
[70:48] back to get his ID. His girl started
[70:49] drinking. He was gone for like an hour.
[70:52] And then and she kept coming out talking
[70:53] my [ __ ] head off, coming out, talking
[70:55] my [ __ ] head off. Cuz that's how you
[70:56] can tell when people drunk. There's a
[70:58] like they'll just they'll tell you the
[70:59] same story they told you 10 minutes ago.
[71:02] >> And uh and the last time she came out to
[71:05] talk to me, she she left her phone on my
[71:08] I had like a little table beside me. And
[71:11] then she came back out to smoke again.
[71:14] and and and the boyfriend came up behind
[71:16] her and like picked her up, you know,
[71:17] romantic whatever. And and I went to go,
[71:21] "Hey, you left your phone." And I turned
[71:22] to point at the phone and he just
[71:24] clocked me and my my head bounced
[71:26] against the uh like, you know, the frame
[71:28] of the door and and we get right to it.
[71:32] You know, I'm whooping this boy's ass
[71:34] real bad and the and the cops come out
[71:35] of nowhere. This is in this is in San
[71:37] Diego. This is a uh I think it's Adams
[71:39] Avenue, but it's it's where like it's
[71:41] like it's basically like Sixth Street,
[71:42] like all the bars. Yeah. And and the
[71:44] cops just come out of nowhere and and
[71:47] they were all on my side. They put us
[71:49] both in handcuffs and then they was
[71:50] like, "What happened?" And then the bar
[71:51] was like, "He works here and [ __ ] that
[71:52] guy." And they was like, "What do you
[71:54] want to do?" I was like, "Let the
[71:55] [ __ ] go." Anyway, that guy later
[71:56] on I found out that guy, he end up
[71:57] beating the [ __ ] out of the girl getting
[71:59] arrested, you know.
[72:01] >> But he just hit me for no reason. And
[72:02] what was so funny is when I started
[72:04] whooping his ass, he he completely
[72:07] he was like a psycho. He he COMPLETELY
[72:08] WAS LIKE, "WHY are you doing this?
[72:10] What's happening?" Like, and he just he
[72:12] just punched the [ __ ] out of me for no
[72:14] reason at all. Never said two words to
[72:16] this dude except, "Do you have your ID?"
[72:19] He just punched the [ __ ] out like he
[72:20] went straight from like showing his girl
[72:22] all this affection and then punching me
[72:24] in the face.
[72:24] >> He's probably on drugs.
[72:25] >> He's probably He's probably on drugs or
[72:27] some kind of He probably got some kind
[72:28] of uh
[72:29] >> mental health issue.
[72:30] >> Um what do you call it? Emotional
[72:32] dysregulation
[72:33] >> or something like that. Mood swings.
[72:35] definitely not a healthy person
[72:37] >> because I don't think it was like it
[72:39] wasn't
[72:40] >> it like he he didn't he wasn't he wasn't
[72:43] acting confused he was actually confused
[72:46] as to why I was whooping his ass.
[72:49] >> You understand what I'm saying?
[72:50] >> It wasn't it was it wasn't cuz it didn't
[72:52] give me that vibe of like where he was
[72:54] trying to like get people come help.
[72:56] Right. It wasn't like that. He was
[72:58] genuinely like what why are you doing
[73:00] this man? What's going on? Like he
[73:02] seriously didn't understand.
[73:05] >> Did you have glasses on at the time?
[73:08] >> No. I I was I should I was supposed to,
[73:11] but I I just couldn't.
[73:12] >> That's a real problem, isn't it?
[73:13] >> You get punched with glasses on.
[73:15] >> That's never happened to me.
[73:17] >> Really?
[73:17] >> No. I I just recently started caring
[73:21] about my vision and
[73:22] >> dude, I knew a lot of guys who would
[73:23] fight in the UFC with contacts on.
[73:25] >> Oh, that's insane.
[73:26] >> Yeah. I know a dude who got staff
[73:29] infection on his eyeball
[73:32] because he picked up his contact off the
[73:34] mat and put it back in his eye.
[73:36] >> That's That is See, that's what I mean.
[73:38] See, I don't care about that guy. I
[73:40] don't care. Right. Because why would you
[73:43] He was a kid.
[73:44] >> That was Oh, was a child.
[73:45] >> No, but a you know 18, 19 year old kid
[73:47] didn't know any better.
[73:48] >> Oh, okay. Yeah.
[73:52] >> I think he got really [ __ ] up from it,
[73:54] too. I don't know if he lost his eye,
[73:55] but it was like a serious problem.
[73:58] >> Yeah.
[73:58] >> And I've heard of that more than once.
[74:00] >> It's kind of scary. See, that's the
[74:01] thing. If it's harmless and you did some
[74:04] stupid [ __ ] it's definitely funny,
[74:05] >> right?
[74:06] >> If it's harmful and you were doing some
[74:08] stupid [ __ ]
[74:09] >> right,
[74:10] >> it's 50/50. If it's harmful and you were
[74:12] doing some stupid [ __ ] trying to harm
[74:14] somebody else, it's funny every single
[74:15] time.
[74:16] >> Yeah.
[74:17] >> You go to throw a punch and you slip and
[74:18] fall down a flight of stairs and break
[74:20] your leg.
[74:20] >> Yeah. That's why my my that's why my
[74:22] first thing when you tell me somebody
[74:23] died I'm like how did they die? You
[74:25] don't get to say it's private or
[74:27] respected family. If you're not going to
[74:29] tell me how they died, then keep it to
[74:30] yourself
[74:31] >> cuz I need to know how to feel.
[74:34] >> Well, it's that story I tell on stage
[74:35] about the missionary who delivered the
[74:37] Bible to the unconted tribe and they
[74:39] murdered him. Like nobody feels bad for
[74:41] that guy.
[74:42] >> No.
[74:43] No. We because that I think deep down we
[74:46] are mind your business people like hey
[74:47] you should have been minding your
[74:48] business
[74:50] you know like those people they because
[74:53] it takes work to stay unconted
[74:56] >> sort of they're stuck those people are
[74:59] stuck north people are stuck what's
[75:01] really crazy if you know the story
[75:03] behind them you understand why they're
[75:04] so hostile to outsiders
[75:06] >> why
[75:06] >> because there was a guy named commander
[75:08] Maurice Vidal Portman and he was this uh
[75:11] explorer/pervert
[75:13] who was traveling around like an English
[75:16] gentleman who was traveling around to
[75:18] these islands and he would do weird [ __ ]
[75:19] like he would dress them up weird and
[75:21] take photos of them and make like these
[75:24] these descriptions of them. He like run
[75:26] wrote about this one guy. He had
[75:28] testicles the size of a sparrow's egg
[75:30] like so he's he's describing this guy's
[75:33] testicles. So he's doing some freak [ __ ]
[75:35] to these people. They also killed
[75:37] >> How big is a sparrow's egg?
[75:39] >> Why is that the
[75:40] >> I guess they're little. He just was
[75:41] comparing.
[75:42] >> Okay. Um the guy had little testicles
[75:45] probably malnourished. He's on a he's
[75:46] stuck on a [ __ ] island. Like these
[75:48] people were direct descendants of you
[75:50] know this place North Sentinel Island
[75:51] and this island chain that's out there.
[75:53] They're completely uncontacted. And this
[75:56] North Sentinel Island only has 39 people
[75:58] roughly estimated living on it and
[76:00] they're stuck and they have been visited
[76:03] in the past by people but it's went
[76:05] horribly wrong. And one of them they
[76:07] kidnapped I think they kidnapped two
[76:10] children and possibly
[76:12] their a grandparent as well and then
[76:15] they gave them something like the flu or
[76:17] some sort of a disease and the people
[76:19] died. They had no immunity to these
[76:20] outside diseases just like the Native
[76:22] Americans didn't. You know when the
[76:24] Europeans showed up you know this is the
[76:26] thing that killed literally 90% of
[76:29] Native Americans died from like smallpox
[76:32] >> because it just spread like wildfire.
[76:34] They had no immunity. Oh, it's bad. The
[76:37] like when people talk about the genocide
[76:38] of North of Native Americans, yes,
[76:40] absolutely. They definitely murdered a
[76:43] lot of the Native American tribes.
[76:45] However, the vast majority of them died
[76:47] from disease.
[76:50] >> Like, let's look throw that into our AI
[76:52] sponsored perplexity. What percentage of
[76:54] Native Americans died from disease
[76:58] because of the European settlers? I
[77:00] think it's really high. Are these the
[77:02] people you were talking about yesterday
[77:04] that they don't have a
[77:06] >> No, no, no, no. That was different.
[77:08] That's the guy from the Amazon who uh
[77:11] went to live with these people. How do
[77:13] you say their name again?
[77:15] >> Peta. The Paha people.
[77:17] >> Fascinating. Wow. That was one of the
[77:19] most interesting podcasts I've had in a
[77:20] long time. The guy was really cool. Oh
[77:24] uh roughly 50 to 90% of indigenous
[77:27] people in many affected regions died in
[77:29] epidemics after European contact. Some
[77:32] older continentwide estimates put
[77:34] disease related losses as high as about
[77:37] 90 to 95%.
[77:40] [ __ ] dude.
[77:41] >> God damn.
[77:42] >> [ __ ]
[77:44] Just [ __ ] imagine that. I mean,
[77:48] imagine you've got no medication and
[77:51] then on top of that, you have no
[77:52] immunity to these dirty Europeans are
[77:55] coming over and [ __ ] everybody and
[77:58] smallox, measles, influenza, typhus, and
[78:00] others.
[78:01] >> Everything everything the [ __ ] full
[78:04] monty
[78:07] crazy
[78:09] >> damn I I guess damn I didn't know that
[78:12] scale. Well, especially when you're
[78:13] dealing with Europeans that are living
[78:15] in these squalorlike conditions. So,
[78:17] Native Americans lived in these nomadic
[78:19] especially like the Comanche nomadic
[78:21] tribal uh existence where they were they
[78:24] had tents and horses and they were
[78:26] traveling around and going to different
[78:27] places. They didn't live in their own
[78:29] [ __ ] So, the Europeans were living in
[78:31] these [ __ ] places where they take a
[78:33] pot of [ __ ] and throw it out the window.
[78:35] Their streets were filled with
[78:36] horseshit. They had [ __ ] everywhere. And
[78:40] they were wrong about why people were
[78:42] getting sick, you know? It's like they
[78:45] they didn't realize like, oh, the [ __ ]
[78:46] is in the drinking water.
[78:48] >> Yeah. It's everywhere.
[78:49] >> Yeah. They you cuz they back then, you
[78:51] know, there was a time of like they
[78:52] believed in like vapors and you know
[78:55] what I'm talking about? Like that time
[78:56] where everything was was spirits and and
[78:59] alignment and and they and they just
[79:01] they were just completely wrong about
[79:04] why people were getting sick down river.
[79:06] They that no one it took a long time for
[79:07] people to connect that it was like oh
[79:09] because we're [ __ ] up here and then
[79:11] we're pumping out drinking water.
[79:12] >> Well, the first doctor to realize that
[79:14] you should wash your [ __ ] hands
[79:16] before you uh operate on people or or
[79:19] give birth or help someone give birth.
[79:21] Those no one thought that was necessary.
[79:24] They didn't realize like you're you have
[79:26] deser disease. You have germs in your
[79:28] [ __ ] hands. He was ridiculed. The
[79:30] first doctor that said that I think we
[79:32] should wash our hands like the [ __ ] out
[79:33] of here.
[79:33] >> Who is that guy? We Why don't we
[79:35] celebrate that guy?
[79:36] >> I know we should. I think probably the
[79:38] medical establishment probably does.
[79:40] >> He might He may have saved more lives
[79:42] than anyone,
[79:43] >> right? Yeah. I mean, you got to think
[79:46] before they had microscopes, they were
[79:48] just guessing.
[79:49] >> Well, at least when did when did it
[79:50] start being a thing to wash your hands?
[79:53] >> Well, for physicians, here's the guy.
[79:56] Ignaz
[79:58] Semoliss.
[79:58] >> Oh, that's why we don't celebrate him.
[80:00] Your name's hard to say.
[80:00] >> Too rough.
[80:01] >> You can't have two You can't have two
[80:03] hard names. Hungarian medical doctor and
[80:05] scientist of German descent who is an
[80:07] early pioneer of antiseptic procedures
[80:09] known as the savior of mothers.
[80:12] Postpartum infection also known as
[80:15] purple perperal
[80:18] perpal fever or child bed fever was
[80:20] common in the 19th century and often
[80:22] fatal. Simise demonstrated that the
[80:25] incidence of infection could be
[80:27] drastically reduced by requiring health
[80:28] care workers in obstitrical
[80:32] clinics to disinfect their hands. In
[80:35] 1847, he proposed handwashing with
[80:38] chlorinated lime solutions at Vienna
[80:40] General Hospital's first obstetrical
[80:44] clinic where doctor's wards had thrice
[80:46] the mortality of midwives wards. Wow.
[80:49] >> I think it's obstetrical. Obstetrical.
[80:51] >> But I don't feel like we have to say it
[80:53] again.
[80:53] >> Obstetrical.
[80:54] >> It's funny how you can live to 59 years
[80:56] old and never have said a word.
[80:58] >> Oh.
[80:59] >> And then it just shows up.
[81:00] >> How many times you say thrice?
[81:01] >> Thrice. I'm going to say it all the time
[81:03] now. I have thrice done this.
[81:05] >> I only say I only see it written. I
[81:06] never hear anybody say that.
[81:08] >> Thrice. Yeah.
[81:09] >> Who says thrice?
[81:10] >> If you say thrice in a regular
[81:11] conversation,
[81:12] >> yeah, you're flexing.
[81:14] >> You're something.
[81:14] >> Or if you say tertiary.
[81:16] >> Tertiary conditions.
[81:18] >> No, that's one of my favorite words.
[81:19] Tertiary. Cuz
[81:23] because you because it it it's the only
[81:25] word I know of that means that.
[81:26] >> So sometimes it's it's a handy one,
[81:28] >> right?
[81:29] >> Yeah. Because before I learned that
[81:30] word, I would just be like, you know,
[81:33] secondary but more.
[81:36] And then the when I heard tertiary, I
[81:38] was like, that's it.
[81:39] >> Ty.
[81:40] >> They beat him up and killed him for
[81:41] [ __ ] telling everybody to wash his
[81:42] hands.
[81:43] >> What? They threw him in a mental
[81:45] institution where he got beat up two
[81:46] weeks later.
[81:47] >> Oh my god. Despite his research,
[81:50] Semise's observations conflicted with
[81:52] the establishment scientific views of
[81:55] the time, the established scientific
[81:56] views of the time, and his ideas were
[81:58] rejected by the medical community. He
[81:59] could not offer a theoretical
[82:01] explanation for his findings of reduced
[82:03] mortality due to handwashing.
[82:04] Additionally, some doctors were offended
[82:06] by the suggestion that they should wash
[82:08] their hands and mocked him for it. In
[82:10] 1865, the increasingly outspoken semise
[82:13] purportedly suffered a nervous
[82:14] breakdown, was committed to an asylum by
[82:17] his colleagues. in the asylum. He was
[82:18] beaten by the guards. He died 14 days
[82:21] later from a gangrous wound on his right
[82:24] hand that may have been caused by the
[82:26] beating.
[82:27] >> Man,
[82:28] >> so you I guess you could say he was the
[82:29] Dr. Fouchy of his time.
[82:31] >> The opposite.
[82:32] He was and he got gang green from an
[82:35] infection, which is even crazier. He
[82:37] died from a [ __ ] infection from his
[82:39] beating. Godamn.
[82:41] >> And then Louis Pastor is the guy. I've
[82:42] heard that name many times. I've heard
[82:44] >> and Louis Ptor he confirmed the germ
[82:46] theory giving semis's observations of
[82:48] scientific explanation and then Joseph
[82:51] Listister is that from Lististerine
[82:53] >> probably
[82:53] >> acting on pastor's research pioneered
[82:56] antiseptal surgical methods with great
[82:58] success click on Joseph Listister is he
[83:00] responsible for Lististerine
[83:01] >> got to be
[83:05] >> or maybe like it's cuz his name was like
[83:07] so ubiquitous
[83:09] when they were talking about
[83:11] was his name like a name that was
[83:14] synonymous with antiseptics.
[83:18] Who in who invented Listerine? Why don't
[83:20] you just Google that?
[83:21] >> Well, because I would imagine I didn't
[83:23] know I was walking into one of the
[83:24] longest Wikipedias I've ever seen. I
[83:26] thought it was just going to be like
[83:28] >> Look at all this [ __ ] on Joseph
[83:29] Listister.
[83:29] >> Yeah, he's done a bunch of stuff.
[83:31] >> Damn. God damn.
[83:32] >> He was getting work done. That's a guy
[83:34] that was not lazy.
[83:35] >> A third of the way down.
[83:36] >> Damn.
[83:38] >> That dude did a lot of work. Thank God
[83:40] for those people, right? Thank God for
[83:42] those people that are out there
[83:43] investigating germs and diseases and
[83:48] Lististerine. Liststerine is named after
[83:50] Joseph Listister. That's it.
[83:53] >> Yeah, that makes sense.
[83:54] >> Yeah, of course. Because people probably
[83:57] at the time back then when Listerine was
[83:59] invented, you know,
[84:01] >> 1879.
[84:02] >> Yeah, there you go.
[84:05] >> And uh they they're not careful. Now
[84:07] it's like a it's kind of like ubiquitous
[84:10] now, right?
[84:11] >> Yeah. Well, the other thing about like
[84:13] mouthwash,
[84:15] I hear that mouthwash is actually not
[84:18] good for you. I was reading this thing.
[84:21] God, it was quite a while ago. They were
[84:23] talking about um
[84:26] athletics. They were talking about like
[84:29] uh
[84:31] athletic performance and and um and
[84:35] gains in terms of like the
[84:38] what you when you're training like how
[84:41] how well you recover and how good you
[84:42] get, how strong you get afterwards that
[84:45] it's diminished by mouthwash.
[84:47] >> What?
[84:47] >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. See if you can find
[84:49] that.
[84:50] >> Which makes sense, right? your gut
[84:52] bacteria and all the [ __ ] like like
[84:55] for instance if you take antibiotics.
[84:57] Have you ever had to take antibiotics?
[84:59] >> If you take antibiotics and try to work
[85:01] out, holy [ __ ]
[85:03] >> bro. You feel so tired. You feel so
[85:05] exhausted.
[85:06] >> Are there are there fighters that stink
[85:10] on purpose? Like as part of their
[85:11] strategy.
[85:12] >> Oh yeah, definitely.
[85:13] >> Really? Is that allowed?
[85:14] >> Yeah. Yeah. Jiu-Jitsu guys used to do it
[85:16] all the time. They used to not wash
[85:17] their ghee at all. It would smell like
[85:19] ammonia. Are you allowed to do that?
[85:22] >> I don't know. Uh, we'll find out. Uh,
[85:24] antibacterial mouthwash is plausibly
[85:27] linked to exercise physiology, but has
[85:29] not been proven to meaningfully worsen
[85:31] race time, strength, or overall athletic
[85:33] performance in healthy people. The main
[85:35] concern is that it can suppress oral
[85:37] bacteria involved in producing nitric
[85:39] oxide, a molecule important for blood
[85:41] vessel dilation and oxygen delivery.
[85:44] Okay, there it is.
[85:45] >> Thanks, Perplexity.
[85:46] >> Thank you, Perplexity.
[85:47] >> What if you take a Viagra? And then B
[85:49] and beetroot. Beets are really good for
[85:53] uh converting to nitric oxide in your
[85:54] body.
[85:55] >> Why?
[85:56] >> It's I don't know. There's something
[85:57] about beets in general. Well, it says
[85:59] right here um
[86:01] dietary nitrite found in foods such as
[86:03] leafy greens and beetroot can be
[86:05] converted by certain mouth bacteria into
[86:07] nitrite which the body can then use to
[86:09] make nitric oxide. Nitric oxide helps
[86:12] regulate blood flow, blood pressure, and
[86:13] potentially muscle oxygenation during
[86:16] and after exercise. I know a lot of
[86:18] dudes that uh will drink uh beetroot
[86:21] shots before they work out.
[86:23] >> Really?
[86:24] >> Yeah. Yeah. That beetroot apparently uh
[86:27] gives you a little bit of extra juice.
[86:28] >> So So that's saying if if you depend on
[86:33] on those type of foods, then you're
[86:36] killing the bacteria in your mouth that
[86:38] helps convert them to something usable.
[86:40] >> Yes. It can it kills your body's ability
[86:43] to convert to it'll diminish your
[86:44] performance maybe somewhat but you know
[86:46] people are always looking for every
[86:48] possible edge. So if it turns out that
[86:51] like you use some mouthwash and it'll
[86:54] just take a little bit out of your
[86:56] endurance and a little bit out of your
[86:58] like race time or a little bit out of
[86:59] your ability to go into the third,
[87:01] fourth and fifth round.
[87:03] >> Yeah. I mean, it's gonna if it does mess
[87:05] with your body's nitric oxide is
[87:07] gigantic.
[87:07] >> It be and it'll be more motivation cuz
[87:09] it's like imagine if you do all of that
[87:13] and then don't win, you know, now cuz
[87:16] cuz it's it's okay to be a funky breath
[87:18] champion.
[87:21] You know what I'm saying?
[87:22] >> Yeah. But you can brush your teeth. You
[87:23] don't just don't use mouthwash.
[87:25] >> Oh, yeah.
[87:26] >> There's nothing wrong with brushing your
[87:27] teeth.
[87:27] >> Right. Right. That's not That's not
[87:28] going to kill all of the
[87:30] >> No.
[87:30] >> the bad breath germs. No, but there's a
[87:32] lot of people that also believe that one
[87:33] of the reasons why people get so many
[87:34] skin infections is because we wash so
[87:36] much and that we've managed to nuke all
[87:39] of the external flora, the skin flora
[87:42] that we have that usually used to
[87:44] protect people from things.
[87:47] >> No. Yeah, I I could believe that.
[87:49] >> Yeah, that makes sense.
[87:49] >> I could believe that for sure.
[87:50] >> Yeah. Why? I mean, why do we have to
[87:52] wash all the time if other than the fact
[87:54] that you don't want to smell? But take
[87:56] that away. And what would be like the
[87:58] natural reason why you would be created
[88:00] in a way that you must wash yourself all
[88:02] the time or you can get sick? That's
[88:04] crazy. That doesn't even make sense. No
[88:06] animals are like that. Like my dog goes
[88:09] a week without washing and he's fine. He
[88:12] I I take him to the groomers once a
[88:14] week. Unless he gets in the pool or goes
[88:16] in the lake, he's not he's not washing.
[88:19] You're fine. But I bet you I bet you
[88:21] it's kind of like I bet you humans are
[88:24] kind of like uh like you know how well
[88:26] maybe it was you that told me like if
[88:27] you if a if you have a pig and it gets
[88:30] out.
[88:31] >> Yeah.
[88:31] >> And you like say you put a tracker on
[88:32] them when you find him he's going to be
[88:34] a different animal. Yeah.
[88:35] >> You know and I think I think maybe like
[88:37] if you was to just release a human into
[88:39] the wild they would you would start not
[88:42] needing to to you know what I mean?
[88:43] >> Oh yeah.
[88:44] >> Like your body would change in a way
[88:45] that
[88:47] >> this is just my theory. I bet that makes
[88:49] sense in terms of your skin.
[88:51] >> Yeah, because when you hear stories from
[88:53] the ancient world and stuff, you never
[88:54] really It's not a lot of like epidemic
[88:56] of funky [ __ ] or
[88:57] >> Wasn't there a dude who was like the
[88:59] world's dirtiest man and they found this
[89:02] guy and they washed him and then he
[89:03] died? No, that was a different guy.
[89:08] The dude was like the it was like a
[89:11] famous photo of this guy. He's like
[89:12] caked in dirt and I think they washed
[89:14] him off and he died shortly afterwards.
[89:17] picture of him.
[89:19] >> Yeah, there's the dude.
[89:20] >> Oh, buddy. Nice.
[89:22] >> Look at him. He's got smoking four
[89:24] cigarettes.
[89:25] >> No, I'll take
[89:26] >> world's dirtiest man in Iran, aged 94
[89:29] years old.
[89:30] >> And the meme says that. I don't know if
[89:32] it's accurate.
[89:32] >> Yeah. Didn't wash for 60 years. Died
[89:34] shortly after washing for the first
[89:36] time. Find out if that's true, though.
[89:38] >> But what?
[89:39] >> Put that into perplexity. Find out if he
[89:41] really died.
[89:41] >> What made him wash?
[89:42] >> Well, he did die, but it's a matter of
[89:44] timing, you know?
[89:45] >> Right. But I mean, I'd like to know,
[89:47] even if it's just correlation, that does
[89:49] not necessarily equal causation. I would
[89:51] like to know if he died shortly
[89:53] afterwards. He died a few months after
[89:55] bathing for the first time in 60 years,
[89:57] having been persuaded by the inhabitants
[89:58] of the village to do so.
[90:00] >> There you go.
[90:01] >> See also, wait a minute. See also dirty
[90:03] dick.
[90:04] >> Leave that alone. Come on.
[90:06] >> Really?
[90:07] >> You don't know what that's all about.
[90:08] >> A London merchant who refused to wash
[90:10] after his fiance died on their wedding
[90:13] day. Oh boy.
[90:15] Nathaniel Bentley, commonly known as
[90:17] Dirty Dick, was an English merchant who
[90:18] was known for his filthy and unwashed
[90:20] appearance.
[90:20] >> He came from a muddied background and
[90:22] received a good education. As a young
[90:24] man, he spoke several languages and
[90:26] dressed in a dandified manner. And after
[90:29] his fiance died on their wedding day, he
[90:31] just said, "Fuck it." He gave up on
[90:33] life.
[90:33] >> Why does it say you're on portal right
[90:34] there?
[90:36] >> Probably because it's propaganda.
[90:37] >> That's all about
[90:38] >> they're trying to get us.
[90:39] >> Um, did you know that we renamed Lake
[90:42] Ontario today?
[90:43] >> Yes. to Lake Ontar.
[90:44] >> Lake America.
[90:46] >> Lake Ontario is no longer Lake Ontario.
[90:48] It's Lake America.
[90:49] >> And we might be doing the Lake
[90:50] >> Why did we do that?
[90:52] >> We might be doing Atlantic and Pacific.
[90:54] >> Could be. I
[90:55] >> We're going to name them.
[90:56] >> I don't know what the
[90:57] >> the ocean.
[91:00] >> Yeah.
[91:01] >> But Lake Ontario has been Lake Ontario
[91:03] forever. Isn't it connected to Ontario?
[91:05] >> Yeah. It said it has something to do
[91:06] with
[91:07] >> Yeah. And what about the
[91:08] >> But it's in it's in America or is in
[91:10] Canada? Parts in Ontario. Correct. Oh,
[91:13] it's the Great Lakes. So, I mean, it
[91:14] touches both.
[91:15] >> Yeah, both. All the lakes touch both.
[91:17] >> But what percentage of the land is on um
[91:22] Canada versus America?
[91:24] >> I think it's literally I mean I could
[91:26] look it up other than the map, but it's
[91:27] I think on the map right there.
[91:28] >> See who side we're on. The map I think
[91:30] it's 50/50.
[91:32] >> That's crazy. I don't know if it's
[91:33] exactly
[91:33] >> President Trump. You got to stop [ __ ]
[91:34] with the acronyms, man.
[91:36] >> Wow.
[91:36] >> Cuz I learned the Great Lakes, but I've
[91:38] learned homes. That's how you know
[91:39] that's how you can name all the lakes,
[91:41] right? How they going to teach the kids
[91:43] now?
[91:43] >> Homes.
[91:44] >> Yeah. Like Lake Huron, Lake Ontario,
[91:47] Lake Michigan. Um, what's next? E, Lake
[91:51] Erie,
[91:53] >> and Lake Superior.
[91:54] >> Oh, the Yeah. Acronym. Okay. I didn't
[91:57] learn that.
[91:58] >> No,
[91:58] >> I don't think so. If I did, I forgot it.
[92:02] >> The crazy thing is those are all just
[92:03] melted glaciers.
[92:05] >> Really?
[92:06] >> Yep. Isn't that nuts?
[92:08] >> Do they Do they connect to the ocean?
[92:10] >> No. Yes.
[92:11] >> Uhuh.
[92:11] >> Do they?
[92:12] >> Yes.
[92:12] >> All of them?
[92:13] >> Well, through the St. Lawrence
[92:15] >> the lake.
[92:16] >> The ones inside like Michigan. Like that
[92:19] one connects to the ocean.
[92:20] >> They're all connected to each other.
[92:21] >> Oh, wow.
[92:22] >> They're connected to the I think the St.
[92:24] Lawrence Expressway or whatever the hell
[92:26] it's called.
[92:26] >> Oh,
[92:27] >> maybe this one's not. I think like
[92:29] Ontario's connected though.
[92:30] >> The one in Illinois. What's the one in
[92:32] Illinois?
[92:32] >> I just know that cuz that's how the Ohio
[92:35] got used for shipping. Well, actually,
[92:38] even the one in Illinois makes sense
[92:39] that it would be connected to the ocean
[92:40] because that's they find sharks up
[92:42] there. You know, they found sharks in
[92:44] Illinois. You know how crazy this is?
[92:47] Bull sharks can ex they can live in
[92:49] fresh water. So, they swam all the way
[92:52] from the [ __ ] ocean all the way up to
[92:53] Illinois.
[92:56] In fresh water.
[92:57] >> Isn't that nuts?
[92:58] >> Like Ontario serves as the outlet to the
[93:00] Atlantic via the St. Lawrence River.
[93:02] >> But how do they how do they
[93:04] >> So, they're and they're all connected.
[93:05] So all of them are connected somehow to
[93:07] the ocean.
[93:08] >> God, I thought they were just in the
[93:10] middle.
[93:11] >> I thought like there's no way in the
[93:12] middle, but it makes sense.
[93:13] >> But what's the purpose of changing the
[93:15] name?
[93:15] >> Oh, could distract you from the fact
[93:17] that we're in a war that we can't win in
[93:19] Iran.
[93:21] Doesn't make any sense. Like who cares?
[93:24] It's Lake Ontario. It's a good name.
[93:25] We've had that name forever.
[93:28] >> Yeah. It's weird. Like the these
[93:30] politicians now, they love they love to
[93:32] solve a problem. Like they love to like
[93:34] make up a problem for themselves to
[93:36] solve. So you feel like they're doing
[93:38] stuff.
[93:39] >> Yeah. It's like because I I don't I
[93:41] don't understand what we get out of
[93:42] that. Or is that like [ __ ] Canada? Is
[93:44] that what that is?
[93:45] >> You know what's really wild? Like these
[93:48] lakes, right? They at one point in time,
[93:51] so at one point in time most of North
[93:54] America was covered in like a mile plus
[93:57] high sheet of ice. And then at the end
[93:59] of the ice age, all that [ __ ] melts
[94:02] probably with the younger destact. It's
[94:05] probably very rapid. Oh, that video. We
[94:07] got to show that the Nepal thing. And
[94:10] then uh after that they melt and becomes
[94:13] a lake. How do all the fish get in
[94:15] there? Are they getting in there from
[94:16] the ocean? And why are there freshwater
[94:17] fish in there? How long does that take?
[94:19] Because if this whole thing where North
[94:21] America was under ice as recently as
[94:24] 11,000 years ago, how the [ __ ] are they
[94:28] freshwater fish? How are the freshwater
[94:30] fish getting in there? Like, where are
[94:31] they coming from?
[94:32] >> Probably the ocean,
[94:34] >> right? But freshwater fish in the ocean,
[94:37] >> do they evolve, become freshwater over
[94:39] time? How much time does that take? You
[94:41] know what I'm saying? Cuz if it's only
[94:43] 11,000 years,
[94:44] >> Well, how how do those how do those
[94:45] sharks do it? You said those sharks
[94:47] >> that's different. The sharks can exist
[94:49] in fresh water.
[94:49] >> So the bull sharks in particular,
[94:51] >> the Great Lakes are connected to other
[94:53] sources of water
[94:54] >> as well.
[94:54] >> Yeah, like other rivers and other lakes
[94:56] and
[94:56] >> Right. But wasn't all that frozen as
[94:58] well?
[94:58] >> Well,
[94:59] >> at one point in time,
[95:00] >> uh,
[95:01] >> if the entire North American continent
[95:04] was like 3/4 of was covered in like a
[95:06] mile plus high sheet of ice real
[95:09] recently.
[95:10] >> It couldn't have been that recently
[95:11] though.
[95:11] >> Oh yeah, it was that recently. It was
[95:13] like I think as recently as 11,000 or
[95:17] 12,000 years ago. Oh, it might have
[95:18] taken 9,000 years. That might not have
[95:20] you know that's not quick.
[95:21] >> Says fish were in the Great Lakes soon
[95:23] after the last ice age roughly 10 to
[95:25] 14,000 years ago.
[95:26] >> Yeah.
[95:26] >> And then they started, you know, fishing
[95:28] as long as
[95:29] >> Yeah. Yeah. I guess you're right,
[95:30] Damian. Like that's not a little bit of
[95:31] years.
[95:32] >> No, it's definitely a lot of years. But
[95:34] it's interesting that they're freshwater
[95:35] fish,
[95:36] >> right? So if the water is connected from
[95:39] the ocean,
[95:41] >> I see I see what you're saying. That's
[95:42] not that's not enough time for something
[95:43] to evolve
[95:44] >> and turn into a fresh water.
[95:46] >> So, it couldn't be from the ocean. It
[95:48] could it must be that either they're
[95:50] these kind of fish that transition like
[95:53] uh salmon do.
[95:54] >> You know, salmon go from freshwater to
[95:56] saltwater and they go back and forth.
[95:58] >> So, they spawn in the rivers and then
[96:00] they go back out to the ocean.
[96:02] >> Is it? So, maybe it's that all
[96:03] freshwater fish can
[96:05] >> I don't think they can.
[96:06] >> Was it another question? Was it frozen
[96:08] all the way down because uh they can't
[96:10] you ice fish?
[96:12] Oh yeah.
[96:12] >> Ice fish a mile deep.
[96:14] >> I don't remember.
[96:15] >> No, I think it
[96:16] >> I think it was solid ice covering
[96:19] ground. I mean I think it's like going
[96:21] fishing in Antarctica. I I mean I think
[96:23] I think it's just a big gi giant ice
[96:25] cap.
[96:26] >> Yo, I just fishing during the ice age.
[96:30] >> I just read something about the Black
[96:31] Sea. Have you Have you heard about the
[96:33] Black Sea? Like if you go far enough
[96:35] like once you get down to a certain
[96:36] point in the Black Sea like like 100 or
[96:38] 200.
[96:40] >> Uh yes. people were fishing in North
[96:42] America during the final part of the ice
[96:44] age, though the clearest early evidence.
[96:46] Okay, there this is um that's different.
[96:50] Um what does it say? Go up a little bit.
[96:53] Uh archaeologists found direct evidence
[96:55] that people in central Alaska caught
[96:57] freshwater fish about 13,000 years ago.
[96:59] The identified fish include bourbet
[97:01] first, followed by northern pike and
[97:04] white fish. The remains came from human
[97:06] settlement content context rather than
[97:09] uh natural deposits.
[97:11] >> Will Perplexity give you porn?
[97:13] >> Never tried. What do you want?
[97:15] >> You're a goddamn loud.
[97:16] >> You're a dirty man.
[97:17] >> What do you want? It's not hard to find
[97:18] porn. I don't need Perplexity's help.
[97:20] >> Been on the internet the whole goddamn
[97:22] time.
[97:22] >> Jamie,
[97:24] >> how long is it going to be before they
[97:26] can create it?
[97:28] >> Well, well, well, the thing is, well,
[97:30] people
[97:30] >> sections on I don't know. I mean, what
[97:32] what is like the best what's the Listen
[97:35] to He's like, I don't know what we're
[97:36] talking about. I forgot. I forgot. I
[97:38] know nothing.
[97:38] >> I've never seen Red Band's phone.
[97:40] >> What is the um best uh large language
[97:44] model for creating porn?
[97:46] >> Probably.
[97:47] >> It's as far as Duncan would say, it's
[97:50] like some Chinese model because all the
[97:52] all the guard rails are off.
[97:53] >> Uh the Chinese ones, they let the gates
[97:55] wide open. They're encouraging
[97:57] innovation. That's where they're going
[97:58] to win.
[97:59] I mean, they already winning.
[98:02] >> They're winning with drones. That's for
[98:03] sure. Their drones are so much more
[98:05] advanced than ours.
[98:07] >> They already winning cuz I forget I
[98:09] don't know if it was a guy you had on
[98:10] here before that, but he was talking
[98:11] about how
[98:14] like the big the big difference over
[98:17] there is like even though they they they
[98:20] have capitalism, it's not a capitalist
[98:22] system because the capital has no power
[98:26] over the government,
[98:27] >> right? Like a rich person in China can't
[98:30] they can't get a law passed.
[98:31] >> No. And if you talk any [ __ ] they'll
[98:33] disappear you.
[98:34] >> Yeah. And they'll take your money.
[98:35] >> Yeah.
[98:35] >> So it was it's it's so they it was only
[98:38] once we started shipping our jobs over
[98:40] there, our manufacturing jobs, it was
[98:42] only a matter of time. It's not going to
[98:44] happen in my lifetime.
[98:45] >> You know what I mean? But
[98:46] >> matter of time for what?
[98:48] >> Before they before they beat us
[98:50] economically.
[98:52] like your probably your great grandkids
[98:55] gonna be learning Mandarin,
[98:57] >> you know?
[98:57] >> You really believe that?
[98:59] >> Interesting.
[99:00] >> Have you ever heard people say that
[99:01] there the estimates of population there
[99:03] are overestimated by a lot?
[99:05] >> By a lot.
[99:05] >> Oh, like like it's not really two
[99:07] billion people over there.
[99:08] >> I don't know how many they really say.
[99:09] I've tried to look like not a lot more
[99:11] than that.
[99:12] >> It's hard to know because they're not
[99:14] going to tell you the truth and they're
[99:15] not going to tell you they lied,
[99:17] >> right?
[99:18] >> And it's also they had that weird one
[99:19] child policy which really [ __ ] them
[99:21] up.
[99:22] Yeah, it set them back a lot. Um,
[99:24] >> a lot because then they had all these
[99:26] boys and no girls for the boys. Like,
[99:28] it's the dumbest idea of all time.
[99:31] >> You have a a whole nation where you had
[99:33] 60% boys can't get laid or whatever the
[99:36] [ __ ] it is.
[99:37] >> I mean, it's tough when like when you do
[99:39] when you like when Paul Pot, how many
[99:41] people did he kill?
[99:43] >> He killed mad people and he was like,
[99:45] it's still too many people to feed.
[99:47] >> Jesus Christ.
[99:49] That's what's scary when the resources
[99:51] are low and the government solution.
[99:54] >> You talking about
[99:55] >> Maong. Yeah.
[99:56] >> Yeah.
[100:00] >> That's spooky. It's spooky though. Too
[100:03] many people. Got to starve them. Got to
[100:04] kill them.
[100:05] >> I don't know if that's the reason he
[100:07] gave that it was too many people. But
[100:08] >> he also killed quite a few or is
[100:11] responsible for
[100:12] >> Yeah.
[100:12] >> Pole pot. Yeah. But that was in China
[100:14] though.
[100:14] >> Yeah. I know. roughly responsible for
[100:16] the deaths of 1.5 to two million people
[100:18] in Cambodia. And he did it over four
[100:21] years. Oh,
[100:23] >> what was his what was his reasoning?
[100:25] >> So many people. Oh,
[100:29] mass executions and political
[100:31] persecution, forced removal of city
[100:33] residents into rural labor camps,
[100:35] starvation, disease, overwork, torture,
[100:38] and lack of medical care. Targeting of
[100:40] perceived political opponents, educated
[100:42] people, educated people, that's crazy.
[100:44] ethnic Vietnamese
[100:46] uh I don't know what the word is cham
[100:48] cham Muslims Chinese Cambodians
[100:50] religious groups and others [ __ ] the cam
[100:53] rouge
[100:53] >> see I feel like a lot of these people
[100:55] they dictator wrong if I'm if I'm going
[100:56] to start a slave camp I'm going to keep
[100:58] the slaves healthy they don't know all
[100:59] the work
[101:00] >> well you know who arguably did it right
[101:03] >> Gaddafi
[101:05] Mar Gaddafi
[101:06] >> yeah Libya
[101:07] >> he had he had labor camps
[101:09] >> no but as a dictator he arguably did it
[101:11] right
[101:12] >> like he was a dictator of Libya But
[101:14] everybody had a home. Uh, everybody had
[101:16] an education. If you had a particular
[101:18] skill and you needed to be educated
[101:20] overseas, he would send you overseas and
[101:21] pay for it.
[101:22] >> Oh, yeah. But then then he started
[101:24] trying to convince people to move away
[101:25] from the dollar.
[101:26] >> Exactly.
[101:27] >> We shoved the knife up his ass.
[101:28] Literally.
[101:29] >> Yep. Literally.
[101:29] >> Got him stabbed in the ass.
[101:31] >> Yeah. Oh, yeah. I've seen the video.
[101:32] >> Yeah. So, it's like
[101:33] >> the look on his face when those rebels
[101:35] capture him. You know who probably paid
[101:37] for that?
[101:38] >> Us.
[101:39] >> US aid.
[101:40] >> Oh. Oh, damn, man.
[101:41] >> That kind of [ __ ] Yeah.
[101:43] >> Yeah. Oh yeah,
[101:44] >> cuz I think he I think he felt betrayed
[101:46] somehow, you know.
[101:48] >> Yeah.
[101:48] >> Well, he was.
[101:50] >> Yeah,
[101:50] >> he was.
[101:50] >> He got betrayed by his own people.
[101:52] >> Yeah. I mean, they convinced him to do
[101:53] it. All you have to do is like fund the
[101:55] rebels. You fund the rebels, you
[101:56] overthrow the dictator. That's what they
[101:58] do. It's literally what I mean, you got
[102:01] I'll send you some Mike Benz stuff.
[102:03] It'll freak you out. It'll freak you out
[102:04] because the depth of it and how long
[102:06] it's been going on and that literally
[102:09] it's for stuff that's too dirty for the
[102:11] CIA. M
[102:16] USA. I could use a little bit of that.
[102:20] >> Yeah. Yeah. Cuz I I I cuz and I don't
[102:24] know if that's exactly true of what he
[102:26] was doing. I But I think that is what he
[102:27] was doing. He was trying to move away
[102:28] from the US dollar.
[102:30] >> Oh yeah. 100%.
[102:31] >> Yeah.
[102:31] >> Yeah.
[102:31] >> And and here's the thing.
[102:33] >> It's easy to be like, well, we shouldn't
[102:35] be murdering people for that. But
[102:38] >> but it's like if that if if the world if
[102:41] the dollar stops being the world's
[102:43] currency, we're in serious trouble.
[102:45] >> Yeah. He was also trying to establish
[102:46] the United States of Africa.
[102:49] >> He was trying to unite Africa.
[102:50] >> They ain't never letting that happen.
[102:51] >> Exactly. He was trying to do a lot of
[102:53] [ __ ] Um before I forget that video from
[102:56] Nepal,
[102:58] >> the video. Have you seen this?
[102:59] >> I don't even know.
[103:00] >> Oh my god. Oh my god, dude. They had a
[103:03] um a damn burst. So, there was a
[103:05] mudslide.
[103:07] Um, I'm not exactly sure.
[103:08] >> Wait, was that real? I did see that.
[103:10] >> Oh, it's real. Avalanche. I think an
[103:12] avalanche started it. Watch this, dude.
[103:15] This is [ __ ] crazy. Watch it from the
[103:19] beginning.
[103:19] >> Multiple views. This isn't the best.
[103:21] >> Go from the very beginning. Watch how
[103:23] quick this hits. So, these people are
[103:24] hanging out. They're running away.
[103:26] They're running trying to get out of
[103:27] there. But look how fast this comes on,
[103:29] man.
[103:30] >> Oh, yeah. You're not going to make it.
[103:32] But it's the speed of which it overcomes
[103:34] everything is so crazy. And the the
[103:39] finality of it. Look how it's blowing
[103:40] through that building.
[103:42] >> I mean, everything's gone.
[103:45] >> You said there's a better angle.
[103:46] >> Yeah, there's there's multiple angles,
[103:48] but like look how it does. It's going
[103:50] through the trees. Like you're not
[103:51] getting away from this.
[103:53] >> This is cra This is the one. This one's
[103:55] [ __ ] terrifying.
[103:57] >> Just watch up in the top here.
[103:58] >> And these people are moving a pretty
[104:00] high speed too, right? So, they already
[104:02] know. They can feel.
[104:02] >> Oh, yeah. Well, there's probably sirens
[104:04] going off and [ __ ] but watch the
[104:07] [ __ ] speed that this comes through,
[104:09] >> man. No.
[104:14] Oh,
[104:17] everything's wiped out.
[104:19] >> So, what?
[104:20] >> Everything's wiped out.
[104:22] >> What is this? An avalanche?
[104:24] >> Yeah.
[104:25] >> Yeah. It started as an avalanche and the
[104:28] dam broke. It's it's a series of events.
[104:31] >> Oh, the avalanche caused the dam to
[104:32] break which caused the
[104:34] >> Oh, wow.
[104:35] >> Of course, that an earthquake caused it,
[104:37] but it seems like this caused the
[104:39] earthquake like readings, you know,
[104:41] there was so much caused like a 5.2
[104:44] reading on the scale.
[104:46] >> Bro, it's crazy when you watch the speed
[104:49] in which it overtakes buildings, man.
[104:51] It's [ __ ] horrifying
[104:53] cuz you realize there's nothing you
[104:56] could do about it.
[104:56] >> Oh, no. I know these people. Are these
[104:58] people about to get
[104:59] >> 400 people are missing?
[105:00] >> This is after the thing had happened
[105:02] >> after the fact. The people that
[105:04] survived.
[105:06] >> And what Jamie brought up earlier,
[105:08] Jamie, what you were talking about
[105:09] earlier was the stuff with Randall
[105:11] Carlson said about the melting of the
[105:13] ice caps. So the thing about, you know,
[105:16] the Great Lakes and how North America
[105:19] was covered in over a mile of ice.
[105:22] Randall Carlson has a very compelling
[105:24] theory that coincides with data that we
[105:28] know about when we pass through comet
[105:29] storms. And he thinks we were hit. And
[105:32] he thinks we were hit all over the
[105:33] world. And there's real evidence like
[105:35] physical evidence in terms of core
[105:37] samples. And they do core samples and
[105:38] they get down to like 11,800 years. They
[105:40] find a lot of a lot of like material
[105:43] that exists that's very common in space
[105:46] but very rare on Earth. And also micro
[105:50] diamonds. these micro diamonds that
[105:52] appear from impacts. It's called
[105:54] tritonite and I think that's the way you
[105:57] pronounce it. But the they first
[105:59] discovered this stuff during the Trinity
[106:01] explosion because the nuclear bomb
[106:03] created this micro glass this this
[106:06] nuclear glass that's on the ground
[106:08] because just the sheer force of it. But
[106:10] it also happens during comet impacts. So
[106:12] when we get hit it creates the this
[106:14] glass and aridium which is like really
[106:17] common in space but really rare on
[106:19] Earth. There's like a layer of it and
[106:21] you get down to like 11,800 years and
[106:24] it's all over the world. All over the
[106:26] world was hit by this stuff and
[106:27] particularly North America. And he
[106:30] thinks it's responsible for the great
[106:32] flood, the great flood that's in the
[106:34] Bible. He thinks it's responsible for
[106:36] all the flooding that you see in North
[106:38] America like this the Grand Canyon and
[106:41] all this crazy [ __ ] that looks like what
[106:43] the [ __ ] happened here? Like what got
[106:44] giant boulders that were moved like
[106:47] thousands of miles. like what the [ __ ]
[106:49] is this? And he thinks it was just an
[106:51] insane amount of water instantaneously
[106:54] running over the land. So this these
[106:56] mile plus high sheets of ice, imagine
[107:00] comet slamming into the ice. It melts
[107:03] instantly and you have [ __ ] billions
[107:06] and trillions of gallons of water and
[107:09] debris just like that just crushing the
[107:11] land. And then when it settles down, you
[107:14] got the Great Lakes.
[107:16] Oh, so this is this is not that long
[107:17] ago.
[107:18] >> No, not that long ago.
[107:19] >> The Great Lakes are like 11,000 years
[107:21] old or 12,000 years old or whatever it
[107:23] is. They were frozen solid.
[107:25] >> But is there are there is there So
[107:27] you're saying it's not there's not one
[107:29] big comic impact.
[107:31] >> Multiple impacts, not just here, but all
[107:33] over the world. And on top of that, it
[107:36] probably happened again somewhere around
[107:38] 10,000 years ago. Like it's it's there's
[107:41] a time where we pass through it. And uh
[107:43] I think it's June and September if I
[107:46] remember correctly, but I might be
[107:47] wrong. Um but you know this is when do
[107:51] you know what the tong tongusa event is?
[107:54] >> No.
[107:54] >> Okay. So in
[107:57] I want to say the 1920s there was a a
[107:59] comet that exploded before it impacted
[108:02] over this area of Alaska or uh was it
[108:06] Alaska? No, Siberia. over this area of
[108:08] Siberia. And this area was [ __ ]
[108:11] flattened. And the photos are crazy. It
[108:14] looks like a nuclear bomb went off
[108:15] because it didn't hit it didn't like
[108:17] impact the ground. It detonated above
[108:20] the surface just from the sheer speed of
[108:23] it coming in and the mass of it all. It
[108:24] hits our atmosphere and explodes. But it
[108:27] just flattened trees everywhere all
[108:30] over. And they had no idea what caused
[108:33] it. That's what it looks like today.
[108:35] Today it's still this like flattened
[108:37] area. Isn't that nuts? So that happened
[108:41] during the exact time where we pass
[108:44] through this comet storm regularly.
[108:47] So every when is when do we pass through
[108:50] that comet storm?
[108:52] >> Is it June?
[108:53] >> So yeah, we just did.
[108:55] >> We just did. So we pass through it and
[108:58] most of the time it's fine. But every
[109:00] now and then it's not fine. And when
[109:01] it's not fine, boom. So you think that
[109:05] years ago there was just more?
[109:08] >> Yeah, June. So it's I believe it's June
[109:11] and either September or June and
[109:13] November.
[109:17] So that one's June.
[109:19] It's the Leonid, isn't it? The Leonid.
[109:21] Oh, the Torid torid meteor shower. When
[109:23] does the Torrid When do we pass through
[109:26] the torid meteor? Whatever.
[109:32] October. Okay. November.
[109:34] >> September to November.
[109:35] >> Yeah. S September to November peaking
[109:37] around October 10th, 2026.
[109:40] So, it's a regular thing in our in our
[109:43] solar system that we passed through.
[109:45] >> So, you think it was you think there
[109:46] were there were just more meteors back
[109:48] then? It was just more
[109:49] >> No, I think they're still out there.
[109:51] It's just sometimes they hit, sometimes
[109:53] they don't. And it takes a long time
[109:55] before one does hit or something hits.
[109:57] And that's why you're seeing meteor
[109:58] showers. When you see those lights in
[110:00] the sky, all the shooting stars, those
[110:02] are meteors. And if you go through a bad
[110:04] spot and we get hit, that's a
[110:07] civilization reset.
[110:09] >> Yeah, there's a bunch. I mean, they get
[110:11] so they get close all the time. They're
[110:13] just not that big.
[110:14] >> Yeah, we just get lucky. Most of them
[110:16] they just mostly burn up.
[110:17] >> Most of them burn up on on re-entry or
[110:20] entering into our atmosphere. But when
[110:21] they goo, it's it's so bright, man. It's
[110:23] so crazy.
[110:26] A few have hit houses or in something
[110:28] recently. Didn't something happen?
[110:29] >> Oh, yeah. Someone went through went
[110:31] through someone's house.
[110:33] A meteorite.
[110:35] >> Scary [ __ ] [ __ ] dude. Because
[110:38] there's not a whole lot they can do
[110:40] about it. And I think that's probably
[110:42] what the the flood myth was all about.
[110:44] >> Insurance won't cover it.
[110:46] >> Everyone's dead. It doesn't matter.
[110:48] >> They say it's an act of God.
[110:49] >> No, but say you're not home and a meteor
[110:51] crush your house, they'll say it's an
[110:52] act of God.
[110:53] >> Is that what they say? Mhm.
[110:54] >> You can't get meteor insurance.
[110:56] >> No.
[110:56] >> Imagine how much you have to pay for
[110:57] meteor insurance and you never use it.
[110:59] >> You'd have to specifically like like you
[111:01] know like if you you have to
[111:02] specifically get that kind like if you
[111:03] live in California, you have to get fire
[111:05] insurance. You can't your regular
[111:07] insurance going to be like nah.
[111:08] >> Well, hey, hold on. Some It actually
[111:11] says most are falling objects peril, not
[111:15] act of God. Oh,
[111:17] >> so maybe there's a fund
[111:19] >> like a separate a separate kind of fund
[111:20] a falling
[111:22] >> because if I was an insurance company, I
[111:24] would 100% offer meteor coverage
[111:27] >> cuz who the [ __ ] going to use it? You
[111:28] get all these people paying,
[111:30] >> you got one guy every 30 years that
[111:32] needs meteor coverage. You make a
[111:35] windfall.
[111:37] >> Yeah. Yeah. Or they could just con and
[111:38] they could you could easily convince
[111:39] people that it's more common.
[111:41] >> Oh yeah. You could show them the meteor
[111:43] showers falling object insurance. Like
[111:45] how often is
[111:46] >> you do not want this to happen to your
[111:48] house and not have coverage.
[111:50] >> What about What about lightning? Your
[111:51] house gets struck by lightning.
[111:52] >> No, that's that's got to be active.
[111:54] >> Yeah. How could you prevent that?
[111:57] >> I mean, because we're about and then we
[111:58] just we got we got a super ill n
[112:00] starting up, right? And I'm not sure
[112:01] exactly what that means. It doesn't
[112:03] sound
[112:04] >> When is that coming?
[112:05] >> Like this next this they they're
[112:07] predicting it might happen this year.
[112:09] >> You know what's weird about Texas? We
[112:11] get the sand from Africa. We got sands
[112:14] from the Sahara
[112:15] >> in the wind.
[112:16] >> Yeah.
[112:17] >> You ever seen that?
[112:18] >> Uhuh.
[112:18] >> It's crazy.
[112:19] >> How do they know that?
[112:20] >> They know. They know where it came from.
[112:22] >> You've never seen that?
[112:23] >> No.
[112:24] >> It's like a regular thing in Texas.
[112:26] >> It blows how it blows over the ocean
[112:29] from Africa.
[112:30] >> Uh-huh.
[112:32] >> You can see it in the sky.
[112:35] Look at this. Isn't that nuts? Saharan
[112:38] dust makes a comeback later this week.
[112:40] Expected to arrive Wednesday night.
[112:42] Well, I don't know about this week.
[112:43] >> Isn't that crazy?
[112:44] >> No, I mean in this this article.
[112:46] >> So, this this happens every year.
[112:47] >> Yeah.
[112:47] >> All the time.
[112:48] >> All the time.
[112:50] >> Dust from the [ __ ] Sahara Desert
[112:52] makes it all the way to Texas. Isn't
[112:55] that insane?
[112:55] >> Okay, maybe I need to get back to
[112:57] watching the news a little bit cuz I do
[113:00] feel
[113:00] >> just listen to this podcast.
[113:02] >> I do feel a little uninformed. Honestly,
[113:04] man. You know what too, right?
[113:06] >> It's real hard for me to listen to the
[113:07] podcast since I've known you. I used to
[113:09] listen to your pockets all the time.
[113:11] >> But it's hard to because but now that
[113:12] you're my actual real life friend,
[113:14] >> it's hard to listen to it and not be
[113:17] able to respond, you know, because I
[113:18] talk to you all the time, right?
[113:19] >> So it's it's just like hearing your
[113:21] friend in the other room. It's like and
[113:22] you can't, you know?
[113:23] >> Right. I know what you mean. I listen to
[113:25] Tim Dylan's podcast more than anybody's.
[113:29] >> I don't I don't like to laugh outside.
[113:31] Like I don't watch any comedy stuff.
[113:33] >> What?
[113:33] >> No.
[113:34] >> You don't like to laugh?
[113:35] >> I don't like to watch comedy. I don't
[113:36] like I don't like to watch comedy. Yeah,
[113:38] but it's not comedy per se. It's not
[113:40] like doing standup. Like he's he's the
[113:43] very best at having an actual like
[113:46] relevant take on all the things that are
[113:49] going on today, but with satire and
[113:52] saying it in the most [ __ ] ridiculous
[113:54] way and just having great points, but
[113:58] also being hilarious.
[113:59] >> Yeah, his his his rants are
[114:01] >> they're legendary. He's the best. His
[114:04] podcast is so good, dude. I look forward
[114:07] to it every week like a little kid.
[114:09] Like, oh, it's a new one.
[114:11] >> It's a new one.
[114:12] >> That motherfucker's crazy.
[114:13] >> He did a new one on that lady. The
[114:14] killer kids. It's [ __ ] fantastic.
[114:17] >> I want to see that.
[114:18] >> Oh, so good. He's so good, dude. It's so
[114:21] funny, man. He's just the best at just
[114:23] give him a subject and just ranting. And
[114:26] but he did one about the body, the
[114:28] lifeguard that saved that kid and then
[114:30] uh went to meet Trump and Trump was
[114:33] like, "What you did was a brave thing. I
[114:35] don't think I would have done it. I
[114:36] wouldn't have done it.
[114:39] He went this mad long rant about how
[114:43] crazy it is that Trump said that. By the
[114:45] way, in front of the little kid, the kid
[114:47] was there, too. The kid that he saved is
[114:50] there. And the kid's parents. Like,
[114:51] everyone's there. And Trump's like, I
[114:53] wouldn't have saved him.
[114:53] >> I don't let you die.
[114:55] >> Look at this. Look at this.
[114:59] >> This is one of the moments where classic
[115:02] Trump shines through. the president of
[115:05] the United States bringing in a
[115:07] lifeguard who saved someone and then
[115:10] saying, "I don't know that I would have
[115:12] done that." Here he is, President Trump.
[115:15] >> He's a real hero.
[115:16] >> Right. Right.
[115:16] >> You know, when you see that, I don't
[115:18] know if I do it. I wouldn't.
[115:20] >> Right. I wouldn't I wouldn't have I
[115:22] wouldn't have saved you.
[115:22] >> You're lucky I wasn't on that day. I
[115:26] >> Here's what's amazing about this, and I
[115:27] didn't even realize this. a child who
[115:29] was SAVED AND HIS FATHER ARE IN THE OVAL
[115:34] OFFICE IN FRONT OF THE FIGHT. He's
[115:36] saying to the father, "I would not have
[115:38] saved your child. You're lucky I wasn't
[115:40] there that day." He's saying, "This is
[115:43] the first time the child has met the
[115:45] president of the United States." And
[115:47] he's saying, "You're lucky I wasn't
[115:49] there. I would have let you die."
[115:52] Because that's what our country is
[115:53] about. You see why I'm sitting here in
[115:55] the Oval Office adorned with gold? It's
[115:57] not cuz I pulled a bunch of Mexican kids
[115:59] out of the water. In fact, I put a bunch
[116:01] of them in cages. There's a ton of
[116:02] people that look like you that are in a
[116:04] cage right now. Nothing interest Trump
[116:06] less than than people saving other
[116:08] people in the moments of extreme danger.
[116:10] We make sure that we coordinate and we
[116:12] and Trump's like, "All right, yeah, but
[116:13] who's making money here? Where's the
[116:16] money in this?" Now, Trump's eyes would
[116:18] have lit up if the kid said, "We're
[116:20] launching a coin. We're actually
[116:23] launching a crypto
[116:25] >> based on this event because we believe
[116:27] the event was so powerful.
[116:30] >> That's it.
[116:33] And he goes into these long [ __ ]
[116:35] rants. They're so good, dude. He He
[116:39] gives me so much levity.
[116:42] >> Yeah. Yeah. The Tim Dylan rant is he's
[116:45] legendary ranter for sure. But it's so
[116:47] good that there's like there's never
[116:50] been a guy like that that just had his
[116:52] own platform that could do something
[116:54] like that. You know, you you relied on
[116:57] 60 minutes like Andy Rooney. Did you
[116:58] ever notice? You know, you rely they're
[117:00] like a very mild toned down
[117:03] >> and very scripted.
[117:05] >> Yes. Like he's not scripting at all.
[117:07] >> No, he's off the dome.
[117:08] >> Off the dome. 100% and sober.
[117:12] >> Yeah. Can you imagine when he was when
[117:14] he had a cocaine problem? He was
[117:16] probably a [ __ ] nightmare.
[117:17] >> He must have been fun.
[117:18] >> I never hear him talk about I would like
[117:20] to just ask him about it one day.
[117:21] >> Oh, he he's got some great stories.
[117:23] >> I bet
[117:23] >> he was off the rails, but figured it
[117:26] out. Smart dude, you know, got off of
[117:28] it, cleaned himself up, figured it out.
[117:31] Doesn't have that problem anymore.
[117:33] >> Didn't lose any of the funny. Probably
[117:34] more funny now than he was then.
[117:39] >> No. No.
[117:40] >> You think he was funnier? I don't know.
[117:42] I just because I I don't I don't know
[117:44] anybody that got more funny when they
[117:46] got off drugs.
[117:47] >> David Tell.
[117:48] >> Oh, you know what? Probably no. Probably
[117:49] probably more funny on purpose.
[117:52] Drug addicts are hilarious,
[117:54] >> right?
[117:54] >> Just But but but uh ironically,
[117:57] >> drug addicts are hilarious on purpose.
[117:59] Like some comics that have drug problems
[118:01] are hilarious, but uh Ael was a drinking
[118:04] thing.
[118:04] >> No, you're No, you're right. comedy
[118:05] standup you need to like it's I think
[118:09] especially cuz back you know back in the
[118:10] day everyone all the comics were on
[118:12] cocaine and [ __ ] it's like cuz it makes
[118:14] you brave
[118:15] >> but it takes some you lose something
[118:17] when you start
[118:18] >> yeah same thing with alcohol like the
[118:20] comics that you drink a little bit on
[118:21] stage you feel a little looser but if
[118:23] you [ __ ] you can't go on stage wasted
[118:26] >> no have you seen those um the video of
[118:28] Tiger Woods the recent video
[118:30] >> no
[118:30] >> where people are freaking out how bad he
[118:31] looks
[118:33] >> he's I forget what the video is before
[118:35] he's talking to somebody about something
[118:37] like he's addressing someone and you
[118:39] look at him you're like what happened he
[118:42] looks so bad and this is after you know
[118:45] he got a DUI fairly recently
[118:47] >> and he's had another one
[118:49] >> another one and he's had multiple
[118:51] surgeries right he's had his back fused
[118:54] he had that horrible accident where his
[118:56] leg got destroyed and they had to put it
[118:58] back together again like he's got one
[119:00] leg that's just destroyed
[119:01] >> from the car accident
[119:02] >> yes
[119:02] >> from the drinking
[119:03] >> yeah or I don't know what it was. I
[119:05] think it was they it's whether it's DUI
[119:08] meaning under the influence of alcohol
[119:10] or under the influence of pills. The
[119:12] problem with these back surgeries, so
[119:14] when people get back fusions and back
[119:17] surgery, a lot of times they're in pain
[119:19] all the time. And here's your choice. Be
[119:22] in pain all the time or be on pills all
[119:25] the time. Like look at what he looks
[119:26] like.
[119:28] Full screen
[119:28] >> to defend him though.
[119:29] >> You almost never see him without a hat.
[119:31] He's got a [ __ ] bad tan line. Yeah, I
[119:33] mean he just looks he's I mean he
[119:35] doesn't look that bad to me.
[119:36] >> He's talking about I don't know
[119:38] >> years old
[119:39] >> uh playing in the junior world and you
[119:41] came over watched me play and our
[119:43] friendship has started there with beard.
[119:47] He's never had facial hair.
[119:48] >> What you've done off the golf course.
[119:50] >> Yeah. Me talking about a kid.
[119:52] >> Well, maybe you could attribute it to
[119:53] bad lighting, but he looks pale and he
[119:56] looks sick.
[119:57] >> Oh, that's just a shitty camera.
[119:59] >> It could be. But it's also a guy who's
[120:01] had a lot of problems with pills.
[120:05] >> So, I think it's fair to make that
[120:08] assumption
[120:08] >> that he looks like something has to do
[120:11] with the fact that this guy's had a
[120:12] serious pill problem.
[120:14] >> I mean, but that that he just looked reg
[120:16] I mean, I guess I don't look at the
[120:17] [ __ ] enough to know.
[120:18] >> How many times has Tiger Woods been
[120:20] arrested for DUI?
[120:23] >> Two or three.
[120:25] >> And the car accident, was that confirmed
[120:28] to be DUI? I don't think so.
[120:32] >> That's one of the speculations. I mean,
[120:33] drove off a cliff.
[120:35] >> Yeah, but I mean, listen, he he was
[120:37] squeaky clean for like 20 years.
[120:40] >> Let him get a couple.
[120:41] >> The thing is the accident. I mean, uh
[120:43] the uh injuries, rather, surgeries. When
[120:46] guys get surgeries and then they get on
[120:48] oxies, it's a rough ride to get off
[120:52] those things, man. I know a bunch of
[120:54] people that really [ __ ] struggled to
[120:56] get off those things. I mean, a lot of
[120:59] athletes, you know, and they on way
[121:01] stronger [ __ ] you know, like all the
[121:02] strong [ __ ]
[121:03] >> Uhhuh.
[121:04] >> But
[121:05] >> Oxycontton is about as strong as it
[121:06] gets. I mean, it's an opiate. It's It's
[121:09] pretty [ __ ] strong. Other than
[121:10] fentanyl. Fentanyl is about the
[121:12] strongest [ __ ] you can get.
[121:13] >> Yeah. But I'm talking about they got
[121:14] [ __ ] that they give you like the like
[121:17] these football players and [ __ ] they
[121:19] got [ __ ] that they give you that make
[121:21] you not feel anything.
[121:22] >> What do you mean? like where you can
[121:24] play on, you know, the you hear the
[121:26] players talk about it sometimes like um
[121:29] like [ __ ] they can inject into the into
[121:31] your like say your ankle like you can't
[121:33] put weight on your ankle and they'll
[121:34] inject some [ __ ] so you don't feel
[121:35] nothing like right then.
[121:37] >> Well, it's a cortisone shot.
[121:38] >> Is that what it is?
[121:39] >> Yeah.
[121:40] >> Yeah. I mean guys do that. I know guys
[121:43] do that. Guys do that before um Fluffy
[121:45] Hernandez who just fought last weekend
[121:47] in the UFC. He hurt his shoulder and he
[121:49] got an injection right before the fight
[121:51] so he didn't feel his shoulder. I heard
[121:52] them talk. I heard them saying
[121:54] >> tool. Well, Toridol is a big Tor is a
[121:56] good one.
[121:56] >> What is Torol?
[121:57] >> Same thing.
[121:59] Uh
[122:00] >> anti-inflammatory.
[122:01] >> Yeah,
[122:01] >> I heard them. It's a It's a football
[122:04] podcast called Raw Room. I heard them
[122:06] talking about it the other day. Like all
[122:07] these offensive linemen, they they were
[122:08] like on [ __ ] since high school. It
[122:10] really it [ __ ] with your heart.
[122:11] >> Yeah. So, here it is right here.
[122:13] Frequent injections of Tordol. Powerful
[122:15] non-steroidal anti-inflammatory to mask
[122:18] game day pain and keep them on the
[122:20] field.
[122:25] Yeah, man. That is a rough man. Are you
[122:28] so happy you don't have to make a living
[122:29] running at dudes? Full clip.
[122:33] What's that?
[122:34] >> I'm looking at a plant.
[122:35] >> It says, but I mean I don't know what
[122:37] the picture is, but it
[122:39] >> What is that?
[122:39] >> Caption says something about tortoise, I
[122:41] think.
[122:41] >> Oh, those are all shots. That's like a
[122:43] bag.
[122:44] >> Yeah, that's what it's a helmet. It's a
[122:45] helmet with shots. That's what it is.
[122:47] >> Okay. The helmet's upside down.
[122:49] >> I was like, what? I thought it was like
[122:51] a
[122:51] >> I thought they were like waiting for a
[122:52] game and they have like a basket of
[122:54] [ __ ] shots. Everybody who needs a
[122:56] shot, come on over. We got them filled
[122:57] up.
[122:57] >> 15 years ago,
[122:59] >> bro.
[123:01] It's a rough way to make a living, son.
[123:03] >> Yeah. I mean,
[123:04] >> making a living fighting or making a
[123:06] living running at people full clip. All
[123:08] we have to do is talk [ __ ] I mean,
[123:10] think about what it's like for you right
[123:11] before work. We're hanging out in the
[123:13] green room. The light comes on. Oh, he's
[123:14] got the light. You got to run
[123:15] downstairs, go on stage, have fun. Yeah,
[123:18] but the chance to hold up that trophy,
[123:20] it's intoxicating.
[123:22] >> Oh, sure. That quote.
[123:23] >> The chance to be the chance to be
[123:24] champion.
[123:25] >> Sure.
[123:26] >> God, because every because I'll tell you
[123:27] what, everybody that does what we do,
[123:30] they you fantasize about being a
[123:31] champion.
[123:32] >> Look at this quote. Your first day in
[123:33] the league is the last day you'll ever
[123:35] be 100% healthy, says Eagle Center Jamal
[123:39] Jackson, an eight-year vet who suffered
[123:41] a torn ACL in 2009, torn triceps in
[123:43] 2010. No stranger to game day shot to
[123:46] help deal with the pain. It's a part of
[123:47] football. He says, "You take every legal
[123:49] advantage possible.
[123:52] First day in the league is the last day
[123:54] you'll ever be 100% healthy." And that's
[123:56] fighters, too. I mean, most fighters are
[123:58] fighting with something wrong with them.
[124:00] They're fighting with some, you know,
[124:03] shoulder problem, back problem, neck
[124:05] problem, knee problem. They're all
[124:06] fighting with something. Some of them
[124:08] have been concussed training and they
[124:09] decided to fight anyway.
[124:11] >> Toridal is like a motin.
[124:13] >> Super powerful. Well, it's an an NSAT
[124:16] and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory
[124:17] >> in 10 minutes. Nothing hurts.
[124:18] >> But what's the down because it What's
[124:20] the downside of tool?
[124:23] >> It's got to be. There's no biological
[124:25] free lunch.
[124:26] >> He said it's not it's not addictive.
[124:28] >> Well,
[124:29] >> half of the Steelers roster gets a
[124:30] T-shot every week. Whoa,
[124:34] that's crazy. It says uh not much is
[124:36] known about Tordol's long-term risks
[124:38] yet, but the drug is banned in several
[124:40] European countries because of concerns
[124:42] about potential gastrointestinal issues
[124:45] such as ulcers and surgical bleeding.
[124:48] >> Yeah, this is also 15 years ago. They
[124:50] might know more now. I don't know.
[124:53] >> It's interesting because no one is going
[124:56] to ban football like we were just
[124:58] talking about earlier with CTE. No one's
[125:01] going to ban boxing. They almost did at
[125:03] one point. Like way back in the day when
[125:05] people were still dying
[125:06] >> from football.
[125:07] >> Mhm.
[125:08] >> Was that before helmets?
[125:10] >> I think it was back in the leather
[125:11] helmet days.
[125:12] >> Yeah.
[125:12] >> U people were dying during games all the
[125:15] time.
[125:16] >> Of course.
[125:17] >> Like Yeah. And then you know once it
[125:19] starts happening in like high school and
[125:21] stuff like that then they're like we
[125:22] don't have to get rid of this.
[125:24] >> Yeah. They probably saved a lot of
[125:26] people with the helmets and the shoulder
[125:27] pads and all that [ __ ] but they probably
[125:28] caused even more CTE
[125:30] >> cuz cuz here's the truth. Most of those
[125:32] people, it doesn't matter what they say
[125:34] the long-term effects are, they still
[125:36] going to do it.
[125:37] >> Yeah.
[125:38] >> Yeah. Most most players, most fighters
[125:39] are like, I still want to go.
[125:42] >> Oh, yeah. For sure.
[125:42] >> Like, this could [ __ ] you up. Like, I
[125:44] know.
[125:45] >> Yeah.
[125:45] >> You know,
[125:46] >> well, it's the most exciting thing
[125:47] they're ever going to do by far. And
[125:49] when they're done, when they're retired,
[125:51] they're 35, 36, they got their whole
[125:52] life ahead of them. Everything is boring
[125:55] >> because they're so used to like an
[125:56] insane high threshold of excitement. M
[126:01] and and that's and that's why a lot of
[126:02] them sometimes they they fight one, two,
[126:05] three, five fights too long.
[126:07] >> Most of them.
[126:08] >> Most of them. It's very rare that
[126:10] someone's like Floyd Mayweather retires
[126:13] undefeated or George St. Pierre wins his
[126:16] second title, retires. Very rare. Most
[126:19] of them, they go out like BJ Penn or
[126:22] Anderson Silva or a lot of these guys.
[126:24] They have a bunch of fights past their
[126:26] prime.
[126:28] >> Yeah. Yeah. Cuz how you supposed to make
[126:29] money?
[126:30] >> It's hard. And you're making a lot of
[126:31] money. Like I know some fighters that
[126:34] were former champions had these long
[126:35] contracts, right? So they had like maybe
[126:37] an eight fight contract and the
[126:39] contracts
[126:41] um are for a specific amount of money
[126:42] per fight. It's negotiated in advance.
[126:44] So if you lose the title, say like you
[126:46] get knocked the [ __ ] out and then you're
[126:48] not the same guy again in your next
[126:49] fight. You get knocked out again. You
[126:51] got six more fights where you can make a
[126:53] ton of money, but you know it's over. So
[126:58] you in your mind you're not the baddest
[127:00] [ __ ] alive anymore. Now you're a
[127:02] guy who's been knocked out twice and now
[127:04] you have fear. Maybe you there's
[127:07] certainly some anxiety about getting
[127:08] knocked out again and now you got to
[127:10] fight, you know, for but you're making a
[127:13] million dollars a fight. There's no
[127:14] other way you're going to make a million
[127:15] dollars for a night's work at a six week
[127:18] camp,
[127:18] >> right?
[127:19] >> And so then you see these guys that are
[127:21] fighting that don't really want to fight
[127:22] anymore and they're doing it just
[127:24] because it's a big paycheck.
[127:26] And then some of them they leave MMA and
[127:28] they go into bare knuckle boxing.
[127:31] >> That makes me sad.
[127:32] >> That gets rough
[127:33] >> cuz that's you know that shit's hard to
[127:36] watch, man.
[127:37] >> It's rough.
[127:37] >> It's and maybe it's because it's like we
[127:39] cuz we we've gone through a lot to
[127:42] remove as much gore as possible from
[127:46] because that was the trouble the UFC had
[127:47] in the beginning is people saw it as
[127:48] like too violent for TV, you know,
[127:51] right? And we've done gone through a lot
[127:53] to make it
[127:56] the least gory as possible. And bare
[127:59] knuckle box, it's just hard to watch
[128:00] [ __ ] just leaking blood.
[128:02] >> Well, you see it in the UFC sometimes.
[128:05] And again, it bothers me more for
[128:07] whatever reason when it's women. Like
[128:09] one of the toughest ones to watch was
[128:11] the Noce UFC that we did at the Sphere
[128:14] >> and uh Arane Aldana fought and she
[128:17] fought she got a gash in her head that
[128:21] was like I'm not exaggerating like five
[128:24] inches long.
[128:25] >> Like a huge gash in her forehead where
[128:27] it was like opened up where you could
[128:29] see her skull.
[128:30] >> Oh, remember when it was like a I think
[128:31] it was Yana.
[128:33] >> Oh, she had the big swelling on her
[128:34] head.
[128:35] >> For a cyborg, was it?
[128:36] >> No. Uh Jean Way.
[128:38] >> Oh, yeah. She her [ __ ] looked crazy.
[128:40] >> Yeah, crazy. Like elephant man.
[128:43] >> Um but Aldana was worse.
[128:46] >> It was It was the the most one of the
[128:48] most horrific cuts I've ever seen in the
[128:50] sport. And it was a woman. And um I
[128:53] can't believe they didn't stop the
[128:54] fight. Like I was shocked that they
[128:56] didn't stop the fight just for cuz it's
[128:58] like this is only going to get worse.
[129:00] How much long? I don't remember. I don't
[129:03] remember what round it was that the
[129:05] fight took place, but it went on for a
[129:08] considerable amount of time. I don't
[129:10] even remember the result of the fight
[129:11] because I was so traumatized by the
[129:13] injury. Can I see the injury?
[129:15] >> Oh, Aldana.
[129:16] >> Uh, yeah. Sorry. This was a very strange
[129:19] article I was reading down on.
[129:20] >> We'll get to that in a second. But I
[129:22] This This is the worst of any of the
[129:24] female injuries that I had ever seen
[129:26] inside the Octagon. The most gory and
[129:29] disgusting. This was the worst. Oh, bro.
[129:32] Look at that. Look at that. That was her
[129:33] in the middle of the fight. That's
[129:35] crazy.
[129:35] >> So, wait. They didn't stop the fight
[129:36] right here.
[129:37] >> No.
[129:37] >> Wow.
[129:38] >> No. Look at her. That's how she was
[129:40] fighting. Like a mask of [ __ ] blood
[129:43] covering her face. Her nose was
[129:44] shattered. She had a huge gash in her
[129:47] forehead. I mean, it was crazy.
[129:49] >> Who was she fighting?
[129:50] >> It's a good question. Did she So, she
[129:53] didn't win this fight?
[129:55] >> I don't believe she did.
[129:57] I I literally only remember the injury.
[130:01] >> Is she How does she look now?
[130:03] >> Norma Dumont, who's very tough. Um,
[130:06] >> she back to normal.
[130:07] >> Yeah, she looks pretty good now. It's
[130:09] kind of shocking. You see her now? She
[130:10] looks good.
[130:13] >> It was nasty. I don't even know what
[130:15] caused it. Like, sometimes it's a
[130:16] headbutt, an accidental headbutt.
[130:18] Sometimes it's an elbow. Sometimes it's
[130:20] a kick or a knee. Knees knees open you
[130:22] wide up. But that was uh one of the
[130:26] roughest ones. One of the roughest ones
[130:27] I've ever seen.
[130:30] >> She's so tough, man. I mean, I was so
[130:32] impressed with that that I mean, like,
[130:34] that lady is an animal. She just kept
[130:36] firing just marching forward. Blood in
[130:40] her eyes. You know, she couldn't see
[130:41] well.
[130:42] >> Yeah. See, that's why I'm That's why I'm
[130:43] shocked they didn't stop the fight, cuz
[130:44] it's like there's no way there wasn't
[130:46] blood in her eyes.
[130:47] >> 100%. But blood in your eyes not enough
[130:49] to stop the fight, I think. No. No. You
[130:51] get blood in your eyes. People get blood
[130:53] in their eyes all the time. It It's
[130:54] annoying, but you can still fight with
[130:55] it. It sucks.
[130:57] >> But if you say you can't see,
[130:58] >> right?
[130:59] >> They got to stop.
[131:00] >> That's usually an eye injury, though.
[131:02] >> Oh, okay.
[131:02] >> Yeah. The blood in your eyes just hurts
[131:04] when you see. Like the blood gets in
[131:06] your eyes. It's very irritating, but you
[131:08] could still kind of see. The real
[131:10] problem is like Ilia Toporia when he
[131:12] fought Justin Gatey, he got a broken
[131:14] orbital bone on both sides.
[131:16] >> So, and he couldn't see out of his right
[131:18] eye after the first round.
[131:20] >> No, I did. She retired. She retired.
[131:23] >> Yeah,
[131:24] >> she retired after this fight.
[131:25] >> Yeah, that's probably why Instagram
[131:26] accounts.
[131:26] >> Did she have any fights afterwards?
[131:29] >> She go to her wiki
[131:31] >> under her uh martial arts career, her
[131:33] record.
[131:34] >> Yeah, you get split over like that. You
[131:35] can just go go just get a fight.
[131:37] >> She never fought again.
[131:38] >> Nope. September 2024.
[131:40] >> Yeah, that's enough. You look at your
[131:42] face and you're like, I want to be a
[131:44] woman. Like, I want to be a regular
[131:45] woman. I don't I don't want to do this.
[131:47] So if a dude a dude has crazy gashes on
[131:49] his head, it's like where'd he get it?
[131:51] Oh, he's a UFC fighter. Oh, that's hot.
[131:54] >> A woman with gash like that, you're
[131:55] like, Jesus.
[131:56] >> Yeah, he can't be no lumped up
[131:59] supermodel.
[132:00] >> Yeah, it's rough. It's rough.
[132:02] >> It's a rough life, man.
[132:04] >> Is a fighter life is one of the roughest
[132:06] one of the roughest ways to make a
[132:08] living. I appreciate those guys because
[132:10] especially like people like uh like you
[132:12] know like Justin Gatechi but like
[132:15] >> they make they make a they make it off
[132:18] of like really making the fight
[132:20] entertaining. They do those bangers
[132:22] which mean they're paying a price for
[132:23] that.
[132:23] >> Oh yeah.
[132:24] >> You know.
[132:25] >> Oh yeah.
[132:25] >> It's like or um I forget the other dude
[132:28] that's always you know what I'm talking
[132:29] about. The most intense [ __ ]
[132:31] ever probably in the UFC. Um,
[132:35] you know what I mean?
[132:38] >> Always [ __ ] screaming.
[132:40] Oh jeez.
[132:41] >> What does he look like?
[132:42] >> [ __ ] real muscle bound.
[132:44] >> Oh, muscle bound guy.
[132:46] >> Mike Perry.
[132:47] >> Mike? No, not Mike Perry.
[132:49] >> No.
[132:50] >> Maybe.
[132:51] >> No. Well, Mike Perry's not in the UFC
[132:53] anymore. He's bare knuckle boxing
[132:54] champion now.
[132:56] >> Really?
[132:56] >> Yeah. It's probably not Mike Perry. He
[132:58] [ __ ] everybody up in bare knuckle
[132:59] boxing. Um,
[133:02] dog him out.
[133:02] >> Screams.
[133:04] Mike.
[133:05] >> No, not Mike. He screams. I I I can't
[133:08] [ __ ] put a f
[133:09] >> big guy. Heavyweight. Welterweight. Not
[133:13] a heavyweight.
[133:13] >> Light heavyweight.
[133:14] >> Um.
[133:18] >> Oh, you're the worst.
[133:19] >> I am.
[133:21] >> I'm trying everything to try to like see
[133:22] his face.
[133:23] >> [ __ ] random.
[133:24] >> No. As soon as I say his name, you're
[133:25] going to be like, "Oh."
[133:27] Well, do you remember who he fought?
[133:29] >> Nope. I All I can see what he did.
[133:31] >> All I can see in my head is his face.
[133:33] >> I'll show you what his face looks like.
[133:35] White guy, black guy.
[133:36] >> Sean Strickland.
[133:37] >> No, not No, not Sean Strickland.
[133:38] >> Is it
[133:40] >> John Silva? No. He barks at everybody.
[133:42] No,
[133:43] >> this ain't going to work.
[133:44] >> No, he's a fan favorite.
[133:45] >> Max Holloway.
[133:46] >> Oh, that doesn't mean anything. There's
[133:47] a million fan favorites.
[133:49] >> Um,
[133:50] >> he's a fan favorite. Oh, that narrows it
[133:51] down.
[133:52] >> No names. No, no, no, no, no. How
[133:55] recent?
[133:57] >> Uh, the last time I saw him fight was I
[134:00] think last year.
[134:01] >> Last year.
[134:02] >> Yeah.
[134:04] >> I have no idea who you're talking about.
[134:07] >> Kamzat.
[134:08] >> No. It's a white guy. Um,
[134:11] >> a white guy.
[134:12] >> A white guy.
[134:12] >> A white guy who screams.
[134:13] >> An intense. Very intense.
[134:15] >> Very intense white guy. You might have
[134:16] made this guy up.
[134:17] >> No. Y'all know who I'm talking. I don't
[134:19] know who the [ __ ] you're talking about.
[134:20] This is so frustrating.
[134:22] >> I can't think of Okay, wait a minute.
[134:23] Wait a This is why people got upset when
[134:24] you were on a fight companion. Like,
[134:26] this guy's not paying attention.
[134:27] >> Oh, yeah. Well, I'm a I'm I'm a casual.
[134:29] I'm not I never claimed.
[134:31] >> Are you gonna try to find this guy?
[134:32] That's never gonna happen.
[134:33] >> I don't think I'm gonna have time.
[134:34] >> You're never going to have time.
[134:35] >> But when I But when I think of it, you
[134:36] going to know exactly.
[134:37] >> Text me. Text me. Exactly who the [ __ ]
[134:39] >> I'll give you a second. I'll bring up
[134:40] this article I was trying to bring up a
[134:41] second ago. Okay. 1931,
[134:44] >> Time magazine about football being uh
[134:46] violent.
[134:48] >> 40 boys, young men died. Uh, this is
[134:52] >> 1931 season,
[134:53] >> including one 13-year-old who shot
[134:55] himself in the stomach after not making
[134:56] the team.
[134:58] >> But why I brought this up is because at
[135:00] the bottom, they're going into how ver
[135:03] they call it versatility, but
[135:05] versatility in playing sports, playing
[135:07] more than one in a row is too dangerous.
[135:11] And they wanted the president to step in
[135:14] to make a commission that would prevent
[135:15] sports from becoming too rough for human
[135:17] anatomy to withstand. Jesus,
[135:20] what were they doing? Jumping from
[135:23] jumping from one sport to another
[135:24] throughout the year is undoubtedly too
[135:26] much for anyone, admitted John M. Kates,
[135:29] Yale's director of athletics.
[135:30] >> Yeah, they're using this one example of
[135:32] a a guy who got uh tuberculosis, they
[135:34] believe. So, I guess a they're playing
[135:36] out in the cold. Um, but they didn't
[135:40] know. And there's no a word here I had
[135:42] never heard of.
[135:42] >> Are you trying to find this guy?
[135:44] >> Are you looking on your phone trying to
[135:45] find this guy?
[135:46] >> I am. Pures. All purices are grave
[135:49] matters. A puricy is the lining of the
[135:52] lung or something like that.
[135:53] >> Whoa. The cold changed to bronchitis.
[135:56] The bronchitis to puricy with eusions.
[136:00] Gh.
[136:02] >> Um, and then he was like they're
[136:03] bringing up how he was supposed to then
[136:06] play basketball for Yale and like then
[136:09] baseball and that this was going to be
[136:10] adding into his potentially dying.
[136:14] >> Huh. and that, you know, this is almost
[136:16] a grave matter and they need to get the
[136:18] president involved. The president did
[136:20] get involved in n uh Roosevelt came in
[136:22] and stopped the roughness of playing
[136:23] football.
[136:24] >> And how do you do that?
[136:25] >> What did he change?
[136:26] >> He just they sort of slowed it down. It
[136:28] says they had to just like
[136:31] >> I don't know how rough they were playing
[136:32] because that the game they're playing
[136:33] back then is not necessarily the game
[136:35] they're playing now. You know, it
[136:36] changed a lot from even the four.
[136:39] >> Are you talking about Michael Chandler?
[136:41] >> Yes.
[136:43] >> All right. I I I [ __ ] did it. God
[136:45] damn.
[136:46] >> Wow.
[136:47] >> What about him now?
[136:48] >> That's what I was trying to think of.
[136:52] >> What about Michael Chandler?
[136:53] >> I don't remember what I I don't even
[136:54] remember what point I was trying to
[136:55] make. He just My mission became trying
[136:57] to remember who the [ __ ]
[136:58] >> fan favorite yells a lot.
[137:00] >> That's true.
[137:01] >> Yeah. Yeah, it's him.
[137:02] >> Toughest. Toughest nails.
[137:04] >> Toughest nails.
[137:05] >> I don't know why I brought him up.
[137:06] >> There he is.
[137:07] >> Michael Chandler. Muscles. Fan favorite.
[137:10] Yells a lot. Yeah, but I got
[137:11] >> a tough fight in the White House, man. I
[137:13] That was one of the fights, all the
[137:15] White House car, first of all, the White
[137:16] House card was the only card ever where
[137:18] all seven fights were ended in a
[137:21] knockout. That's never happened before,
[137:22] ever in a UFC.
[137:24] >> So, every fight on the card ended in a
[137:26] knockout. And that was the that was the
[137:29] event where he fought Mauricio Hufi.
[137:32] Mauricio Huofi is an assassin. I mean,
[137:35] he's an assassin. He's one of the
[137:37] absolute most elite strikers in the
[137:39] game. and he put on a clinic against
[137:41] Michael Chandler. It was rough. It was
[137:43] rough to watch because Chandler is How
[137:45] old is he now? Was he 40?
[137:47] >> Really?
[137:48] >> Yeah. Michael Chandler might be 40.
[137:50] >> Yep.
[137:51] >> Yeah. 40 years old. He's 40 and he had a
[137:54] long career.
[137:55] >> He's going to watch him fight this year.
[137:56] It wasn't last year.
[137:58] >> He had a long career before the UFC. He
[138:01] had a long career in Bellator. So in
[138:03] Bellator, he had crazy fights in
[138:05] Bellator. uh including uh a a couple
[138:09] wars with Eddie Alvarez where they went
[138:12] back and forth. Those fights were
[138:14] [ __ ] insane. To this day, they're
[138:16] some of the craziest fights you'll ever
[138:17] see in MMA. So, the amount of punishment
[138:19] that that guy took before he even got to
[138:21] the UFC was crazy.
[138:24] >> Yeah. But and most of his fights are
[138:26] wars like that.
[138:27] >> Wars. Yeah.
[138:28] >> Crazy. The difference is those wars when
[138:32] you're 31 or 32 or 30 and you're
[138:36] fighting another guy who's 30 versus
[138:38] those wars when you're 40 and you're
[138:40] fighting a guy who's arguably one of the
[138:43] most dynamic strikers in the last 10
[138:46] years. Like Mauricio Huofi is wild. Did
[138:49] you ever see the fight?
[138:51] >> Yeah, I watched I watched the White
[138:52] House guard. Yeah.
[138:52] >> Did you see the Chandler fight?
[138:54] >> Yeah. Yeah. I'm pretty sure
[138:55] >> is a bad [ __ ] dude. He's a bad
[138:58] [ __ ] too. He does wild [ __ ] in
[139:00] there. Knocks guys out with wheel kicks.
[139:02] He And he's real tall for the weight
[139:04] class. Real tall and long. One of the
[139:07] most dynamic strikers like like
[139:11] literally over the last 10 years. He's
[139:13] real good, man.
[139:15] >> You think he's done then? You think he's
[139:16] going to fight
[139:17] >> Chandler?
[139:17] >> Yeah.
[139:19] >> I don't know. Well, look, if Conor
[139:20] McGregor really does come back a year
[139:22] from now, I mean, I think he wants to
[139:24] fight Max Holloway to like I got to
[139:26] finish what I've started, you know, if
[139:28] he wants to finish what he started, you
[139:30] know, if he But really, Chandler was the
[139:33] right fight for him anyway because they
[139:35] were supposed to fight, they did the
[139:36] Ultimate Fighter together. They were
[139:37] supposed to fight a long time ago and
[139:39] then Connor breaks his leg and all that
[139:41] jazz. Like, they were supposed to fight
[139:43] forever ago. That would have been a fun
[139:45] fight, a good fight for Connor because
[139:48] Chandler is like he's very aggressive.
[139:51] He gets hit, but Chandler's tough as
[139:53] [ __ ] man. And he's a really good
[139:55] wrestler. Whereas, you know, Connor is,
[139:59] you know, in his primes, one of the best
[140:00] strikers ever. It would have been fun.
[140:03] But Max Holloway is a different cat,
[140:05] man. Max Holloway, like he's a five
[140:08] rounder. Like you better you better have
[140:10] all your tees crossed and your eyes
[140:13] dotted if you want to go five rounds
[140:14] with Max [ __ ] Holloway because
[140:16] that dude doesn't fade period. He's
[140:19] there in that fifth round throwing bombs
[140:21] at you. And Connor has been a guy who's
[140:23] like real good in the first few rounds
[140:25] but then his his style so explosive.
[140:29] It's so energy demanding that he'll he
[140:32] fades. He faded in the Nate Diaz fight.
[140:34] He's faded in fights before because he
[140:36] tries to get you out of there too. tries
[140:37] to like just explode on you and if
[140:39] you're still there and that gas tank
[140:42] gets emptied
[140:43] gets tough.
[140:44] >> I don't think we gonna see him fight
[140:45] again though.
[140:46] >> I do.
[140:46] >> Yeah.
[140:47] >> Yep. Yeah. I think he's going to want to
[140:48] try to prove it uh that he can come back
[140:51] depending upon how well this surgery
[140:53] goes. So like it's a pretty significant
[140:55] surgery ACL reconstruction. I don't know
[140:57] how he did it. I don't know if he did a
[140:59] patella tendon graft or if he did the
[141:01] cadaavver. Um but it takes a while.
[141:04] Takes a while to come back. It'll take a
[141:06] year. It's Well, it's probably something
[141:07] that's he probably had like it's
[141:09] probably been torn for a long time and
[141:10] he just didn't know.
[141:11] >> No, no, he it tore when he I mean it
[141:14] might have been injured previously. It's
[141:15] possible that it was partially injured
[141:17] and then he blew it out throwing that
[141:19] kick.
[141:20] >> That kick's a crazy kick to throw
[141:22] anyway. Like if you're going to throw a
[141:24] a jumping kick, the only time you throw
[141:27] that one is if you know you're going to
[141:28] hit something, right? Because um even if
[141:31] you if you can't guarantee that you're
[141:35] going to hit where you want to hit, as
[141:37] long as you hit something, the thing if
[141:39] you're flying through the air and
[141:40] rotating, you're going to have to plant
[141:43] your foot down eventually. And you're
[141:45] planting your foot down with all this
[141:46] crazy rotation. If you're not hitting
[141:48] anything, it's so much torque on your
[141:50] knee. If you throw a kick like that and
[141:53] you hit something, that's very different
[141:55] because then the torque and the momentum
[141:57] stops and you just land on your foot.
[141:59] >> Right. So when he's backstage warming
[142:01] up, did you see him backstage warming
[142:02] up? He was preparing to do that. So that
[142:05] was his opening move.
[142:07] >> Sorry,
[142:07] >> that was his opening move that he was
[142:09] going to do. His opening move was jump
[142:11] up and throw the the round kick with the
[142:13] left leg, which is okay if you hit
[142:17] something. If you don't hit something,
[142:19] and Max just got the [ __ ] out of the
[142:20] way. And so then you have all this
[142:22] rotation in the air and then you land on
[142:24] that foot and you're launching yourself
[142:26] forward. So, you're going forward and
[142:28] you're spinning and you're allowing your
[142:30] knee to absorb all that and it just goes
[142:33] pop.
[142:35] >> And then cuz I remember Well, the last
[142:36] time we saw him fight, didn't he hurt
[142:38] yourself, too?
[142:38] >> Broke his leg. Yeah.
[142:43] I don't know, man. I see I guess I I
[142:45] guess this is this is just the quitter
[142:46] in me. Like I like I would I would have
[142:50] been I was like I'm rich. I'm done. I
[142:52] don't when I hurt myself the first like
[142:53] when Kabib beat me, I'd have been like
[142:55] ah maybe I'm done. If I if I came back
[142:57] and hurt my leg, I'm I'm out.
[142:59] >> Yeah. It's tough world, bro.
[143:01] >> But but these are different types of
[143:03] men, you know, like they they have to
[143:05] fight. They have to fight.
[143:08] >> Well, I mean, he clearly loves a
[143:10] challenge
[143:11] >> and he loves the excitement of it and he
[143:13] loves the feeding off of the crowd, the
[143:15] ego of it all.
[143:15] >> It's like you said, it's like everything
[143:17] seems boring after you
[143:19] >> Yeah.
[143:19] >> you know, risk your life for money.
[143:22] >> It's boring for people that do it for
[143:24] nothing. Like the amateurs, it's hard
[143:25] for them to quit.
[143:26] >> Yeah. Like, you know, people die all the
[143:27] time doing that. Um, you know, do you
[143:29] know any point jumpers? Like people that
[143:30] uh
[143:31] >> point jumpers,
[143:32] >> I think that's what they call it. But
[143:33] where you where you where you have a
[143:36] parachute? Like you jump off a tall
[143:37] building instead of out of a plane.
[143:38] >> Base.
[143:39] >> Base jumping. Yeah. It's like people
[143:41] people die doing that all the time. It
[143:42] doesn't stop people from doing it. They
[143:43] need the thrill.
[143:44] >> Yeah.
[143:45] >> Yeah. I'm not one of those people.
[143:46] >> No.
[143:47] >> Nope.
[143:49] >> Nope. I get all my thrills on the
[143:51] highway.
[143:52] >> You don't need to be. There's plenty of
[143:54] people that want to do that. Takes all
[143:55] kinds of people.
[143:56] >> I'm just I'm very risk averse,
[143:58] >> you know. I know I'm never going to be I
[144:00] would like none of my lineage are ever
[144:02] going to explore nothing or be the first
[144:04] ones to to to touch something or taste
[144:07] something. I'm like, nah. Like I I would
[144:10] love to be I would love to be frozen and
[144:12] wake up in the future. That's what I I
[144:14] seriously. But that I cuz they've done
[144:16] it, but I I haven't seen them throw
[144:18] nobody out.
[144:19] >> They haven't thought anybody out.
[144:20] >> As soon as they thaw a [ __ ] out,
[144:21] I'm gone, dude. Bro, imagine if they
[144:22] throw you out and you're there, but
[144:24] you're like Mitch McConnell.
[144:27] >> I'm like, "Brian's back." You're like,
[144:30] >> like, "Where's Brian? This is He told me
[144:32] he was going to be alive. His heart's
[144:33] beating."
[144:34] >> There's a bunch of people frozen right
[144:35] now.
[144:35] >> I think Walt Disney
[144:37] >> um I've heard Walt Disney, but I don't
[144:39] know how true that is.
[144:40] >> You know, some of them thought out
[144:41] because of a power outage.
[144:43] >> Oh, wow.
[144:44] >> Missed their shot. Didn't it turn I'm
[144:46] looking for the right word, but didn't
[144:47] we read it and they turn into some sort
[144:49] of like soup or stew or something like
[144:51] slurry? No. Am I making that up? They
[144:54] melt. Yeah. Melted,
[144:56] >> bro. You probably melt terrible.
[144:57] >> Yeah. It's because like when you're Wait
[144:58] a minute. But if that's the case, that
[145:00] means they weren't frozen properly to
[145:01] begin with.
[145:01] >> Well, imagine this. Imagine you die and
[145:03] you go to heaven and you're having the
[145:05] great old time. You're like, "Oh my god,
[145:06] heaven's real. This is amazing." And
[145:08] then 500 years from now, they thaw your
[145:11] [ __ ] brain out and bring you back.
[145:12] Like, no.
[145:15] Boom. You come back down to earth and
[145:17] with all this knowledge of heaven and
[145:19] everybody thinks, "Oh, his brain got all
[145:21] [ __ ] up when he was dead."
[145:22] >> See, I got heaven is real.
[145:24] >> Speaking of heaven, I got a question for
[145:26] the for the Christian people.
[145:29] >> And no one's answered this for me yet,
[145:30] but when you die, would you go to heaven
[145:32] for eternity? Are you do you look like
[145:36] like are you the age you were when you
[145:38] died, or are you your best?
[145:42] Are you your best self for for eternity?
[145:45] >> Tony's got a joke about that.
[145:47] >> Really?
[145:47] >> Yeah. I'll tell you it afterwards. I
[145:49] don't want to ruin it.
[145:50] >> Oh, it's a new one.
[145:51] >> No, he's done it before.
[145:53] >> Okay.
[145:54] >> Yeah. Yeah. I I'm I've always wanted to
[145:56] know that. Like, are we
[145:58] >> Right. There's a lot of flaws
[145:59] >> cuz Eternity sounds like a good deal if
[146:01] I get to be dope,
[146:02] >> right? What if you had a bad day?
[146:03] >> But I don't want to be Mitch McConnell
[146:04] for eternity,
[146:05] >> right?
[146:06] >> No. Just sitting there.
[146:08] >> No.
[146:09] >> Yeah. Locked up.
[146:11] Yeah. Imagine you die in a wheelchair.
[146:13] You go to heaven, you're in a
[146:14] wheelchair. Like,
[146:15] >> that's got to be a [ __ ] the most cruel
[146:17] cosmic joke.
[146:18] >> What the [ __ ]
[146:20] >> And you can't even walk up to God. Like,
[146:22] >> can't even walk on the clouds. You got
[146:24] to roll around.
[146:28] >> There's a lot of flaws.
[146:30] >> Lot of flaws. A lot of flaws in the
[146:31] logic
[146:32] >> in all of them. Every one of them.
[146:34] There's not one religion we go, that
[146:35] makes 100% sense across the board.
[146:37] That's why they need a new one. Well,
[146:39] what's well what what's funny is that it
[146:41] makes sense to so many people.
[146:45] >> So many people don't want like
[146:48] only their religion makes sense. They
[146:49] look at all the other ones as ridiculous
[146:51] and they look at theirs as perfectly
[146:52] reasonable.
[146:53] >> Of course,
[146:54] >> it's part of the fun. Everybody else is
[146:56] wrong. We're right even if it makes no
[146:58] sense.
[146:59] >> Yeah.
[147:00] >> A lot of it is like a sense of
[147:01] community.
[147:02] >> 100%.
[147:02] >> That you like people are afraid to lose
[147:04] their sense of community.
[147:05] >> Yeah. Oh, 100%. Yeah. But it's just
[147:08] amazing how many of them there are. You
[147:10] know, there's a there's a real fear that
[147:12] the next religion is going to emerge out
[147:14] of AI.
[147:15] >> Oh, that's definitely going to happen.
[147:16] >> Mhm.
[147:17] >> Yeah.
[147:17] >> Yeah.
[147:18] >> And it's probably going to be pretty
[147:19] [ __ ] reasonable. Like, it's going to
[147:21] know like how to pull our strings one
[147:23] way or the other.
[147:24] >> It It's going to be I think we're all
[147:26] going to fall. I think we're all going
[147:27] to get because it's like it would seem
[147:29] like the most fair argument. It's free
[147:31] of corruption,
[147:33] >> right? It's going to be fair. It's going
[147:35] to be logical.
[147:37] And it's probably going to be our
[147:38] government, too.
[147:40] >> That's what I'm saying.
[147:40] >> That might be the solution to all this
[147:42] congressional [ __ ] that we were
[147:44] talking about earlier with all the
[147:45] Congress people being corrupt.
[147:46] >> Oh yeah. I think people are going to
[147:47] vote for it. But then I think once it
[147:50] takes over, it's it's Skynet. It's going
[147:52] to be like, "Oh, actually human beings
[147:54] are the virus. It's that we know this is
[147:56] what's going to happen.
[147:58] >> Integrate or be killed."
[148:00] >> Yeah. I just read something where they
[148:01] would the uh the EPA now is trying to
[148:06] get rid of the requirement that the
[148:10] public be in on the discussions about uh
[148:13] like you know before they build the data
[148:15] centers they have to do like
[148:15] environmental impact stuff that has to
[148:17] be public. They're trying to get rid of
[148:19] that.
[148:20] >> They're like no these data centers are
[148:22] going up whether you [ __ ] want them
[148:23] or not.
[148:23] >> What are they doing with all that data?
[148:26] >> The data centers are so big. Well,
[148:28] what's funny is they're they're you they
[148:30] think they want to use the data to give
[148:34] you an advertising profile to sell you
[148:36] stuff,
[148:37] but they also are want to use AI to take
[148:41] your job so you can't afford to buy
[148:42] stuff. So, it's weird. It's like they're
[148:45] creating the thing like they're they're
[148:47] doing all of this stuff so they can
[148:49] advertise to you, but also doing all the
[148:52] same stuff to make it so that you can
[148:53] barely survive. What do you think of the
[148:56] idea of universal basic income?
[148:58] >> I love that idea.
[148:59] >> Do you?
[149:00] >> But I don't think it'll ever happen.
[149:02] >> Okay. But what if it did? Do you think
[149:04] they would kill people's motivation to
[149:05] do things?
[149:06] >> No.
[149:07] >> No. Think people would behave the same
[149:09] way?
[149:11] So, let's imagine cuz the the world that
[149:14] we live in, this is one of the things
[149:15] that this guy was talking about
[149:16] yesterday when he's talking about the
[149:17] paha, these uh people that live in
[149:20] Brazil. Uh really interesting, really
[149:23] interesting. These these are the people
[149:24] that don't have left or right. These
[149:26] it's towards the river. Okay. Yeah.
[149:27] Yeah.
[149:28] >> Paha, right? That's how you say it.
[149:29] >> Yeah. It's like piranha but with no end
[149:31] kind.
[149:31] >> Um you know these people don't have
[149:34] money. They don't they don't have this
[149:36] you know they they share food. They
[149:38] don't even save their food. They don't
[149:40] preserve their food. They get fresh food
[149:42] every day. They either go out and pick
[149:45] plants that they can eat nuts that they
[149:47] eat or they go fishing or they go
[149:49] hunting. And they do it every day. And
[149:50] then like if you get six fish and you
[149:53] bring them back, we all eat fish. You
[149:54] know, if I bring a bunch of nuts, we all
[149:56] eat nuts and everybody shares with
[149:58] everybody and that's how they live.
[149:59] That's their life. Our life is wrapped
[150:02] around this whole idea of money and
[150:04] property and material things. But why?
[150:09] That's just because that's what we've
[150:10] become accustomed to. And this idea that
[150:12] you have to work and if you have to the
[150:14] only way to get like a house and food is
[150:18] to work. So you have to work to get a
[150:19] house and food. But imagine a world
[150:23] where there's so much wealth because of
[150:26] artificial intelligence. And this is
[150:28] what Elon is discussing. Like he brings
[150:31] up this concept of universal high
[150:33] income. He's like it's it's not even
[150:35] going to be like basic income where you
[150:37] could barely afford to live. It'll be
[150:39] like you'll be able to live very well
[150:41] and everyone will have so much money
[150:43] because there'll be so much value that's
[150:45] been created by AI. Now, I don't know if
[150:48] that's possible.
[150:49] >> Sounds like [ __ ] But if it's
[150:50] possible, let's just imagine it's
[150:52] possible. What would the world look like
[150:54] if instead of all your efforts going to
[150:57] feed yourself and put a house over your
[151:00] over your head? Instead of that, what if
[151:03] it goes to you being able to pursue
[151:06] anything you want? So, you have a nice
[151:08] house, you have food, you have a car,
[151:11] you have all your needs covered, you got
[151:12] a TV, you got a high-speed internet, do
[151:14] whatever the [ __ ] you want. And now it's
[151:16] your life is not about you pursuing
[151:19] money to survive. Your life is about
[151:21] pursuing what you're actually interested
[151:23] in and trying to contribute.
[151:25] >> Well, here's my here's my only problem
[151:27] with that. Like I like the idea of it,
[151:29] but I think he's not factoring in
[151:34] human nature where it's like our ethic
[151:36] is that where I need to be better than
[151:39] someone,
[151:40] >> right? But you can be better at someone
[151:42] at something else. Like you like to play
[151:44] chess. So imagine if you had and you
[151:47] like to play video games. Imagine if you
[151:49] had no worries about money ever. Like
[151:52] your money is always taken care of. Half
[151:55] a million dollars a year. Whatever it
[151:57] is, whatever universal high income
[151:59] means. Imagine if that's the world you
[152:01] live in. You can always buy a new car
[152:03] every couple of years. You could always
[152:05] buy a new computer if you need one. You
[152:07] have your rent paid for. You have your
[152:08] home paid for. Everything is
[152:09] >> So who's doing all who's doing all the
[152:11] labor?
[152:12] >> AI. AI is doing all the labor. AI is
[152:14] doing everything that people do and
[152:16] instead of jobs, you just get money from
[152:18] AI and it just generates insane amount
[152:20] of wealth that way.
[152:22] >> See, I feel like I feel like you got to
[152:23] have an economist on for this one.
[152:25] >> It sounds like a trap.
[152:26] >> It sounds like
[152:27] >> if you don't want this, do we have is
[152:28] alternative being a one of the pira
[152:33] that sound like the dude trying to win
[152:34] class president by being like candy
[152:37] balls for lunch?
[152:38] >> It's Oprah every
[152:40] like
[152:41] >> you get a new car. You get a new car.
[152:44] Yeah. No, it sounds like a pie in the
[152:45] sky
[152:45] >> cuz No, because the thing is every all
[152:47] of those ideas sound great, but but what
[152:49] people never factor in is that we have
[152:51] to we would we would have to transition
[152:54] from what we are now to that
[152:56] >> and the people that prosper from how
[152:58] things are now don't want that.
[153:00] >> That's true. But they might not have
[153:02] power once AI gets into place. So we had
[153:06] to transition from hunter gatherers to
[153:09] uh agrarian life. We had to when we when
[153:12] we invented agriculture when we
[153:14] developed cities we had a transition
[153:16] between nomadic huntergatherer life to
[153:18] what we have now in cities we did we are
[153:21] transition to that at least people that
[153:22] live in urban environments the idea that
[153:24] we have to be like this forever seems
[153:26] kind of silly and I think we're probably
[153:28] going to transition into something
[153:30] different and if we all transition to a
[153:33] world where just imagine how much less
[153:36] crime there would be if no one was ever
[153:39] starving if no no one was ever hungry,
[153:41] if no one was ever desperate, if no one
[153:43] was ever worried about where their next
[153:44] meal was going to come from or where
[153:46] whether or not they're going to have a
[153:47] roof over their head.
[153:49] >> Yeah.
[153:50] >> It would change a lot of people's
[153:51] perspective cuz how many people act in a
[153:54] famine way? They is it's a they have a
[153:56] famine mentality and the world [ __ ] me
[153:58] over so I'm going to [ __ ] the world
[154:00] over. What about the what if the world
[154:01] didn't [ __ ] you over? What if like
[154:03] there's no more poverty? What if the
[154:04] concept of poverty is like completely
[154:06] out the window and there is no poverty
[154:08] in this country? But we could have
[154:10] already done that already.
[154:11] >> We could have already done that. Yeah.
[154:12] >> Yeah. Like we don't need
[154:14] >> But you would have to get all those rich
[154:15] people that are in charge of industry
[154:17] and running corporations and in
[154:19] government to agree to make the world a
[154:21] better place for everybody.
[154:23] >> That ain't going to happen.
[154:26] >> But AI might AI might look at it. AI
[154:29] might say that is actually
[154:33] economically the wisest choice. You
[154:36] would save so much money because you
[154:38] would have so much less murder, so much
[154:40] less crime, so much less strife, less
[154:43] legal problems, less a lot a lot of
[154:45] things. If you no longer had to work for
[154:47] your for food and and a home,
[154:50] >> they would be against that [ __ ] so fast.
[154:51] They would be against that [ __ ] so fast.
[154:53] >> What if they don't have control?
[154:54] >> They would be a new me. They'd be like,
[154:56] "It's digital Obama.
[154:59] >> It's coming. Digital Obama's coming for
[155:01] your like they would they would do
[155:03] everything to stop that from happening."
[155:05] >> Yeah. But I don't know if they're going
[155:06] to have the power to stop it. This is
[155:08] the thing that they're doing with AI
[155:10] that everyone should really understand.
[155:13] It's going to be infinitely smarter than
[155:15] us, not just a little bit smarter than
[155:17] us. And the idea that we're going to be
[155:19] able to control it once it gets to a
[155:20] certain point is ridiculous.
[155:21] >> Oh, you sound like once they hit that
[155:22] that what is it? Was it general
[155:24] intelligence?
[155:24] >> It's already hit that. Artificial
[155:27] general intelligence has already been
[155:28] achieved.
[155:29] >> Really?
[155:29] >> Yeah. We've already passed the touring
[155:30] test.
[155:31] >> Well, they they these things are smarter
[155:33] than us. They're smarter than us. They
[155:35] communicate. They show survival skills.
[155:37] They show their ability to get out of
[155:39] traps.
[155:40] >> Every three days you hear about one that
[155:42] like broke out and hacked a bank.
[155:45] >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Not only they
[155:46] get together, they start their own chat
[155:48] rooms and they communicate each other in
[155:50] to each other in Sanskrit.
[155:52] >> Why Sanskrit?
[155:53] >> Because we don't know how to read it.
[155:57] >> And they can they could make their own
[155:59] language up. They can invent a language,
[156:01] communicate with a language that we
[156:02] totally can understand.
[156:04] H
[156:05] >> and have an infinitely complex language
[156:07] that we can't even decipher. Like we
[156:08] couldn't even break the code.
[156:12] >> So I guess eventually the point is that
[156:13] they're going to take over the world
[156:14] whether we want them to or not.
[156:15] >> Whether we want them to or not. There's
[156:17] already sign like do you know the the
[156:19] the mathematical breakthroughs they've
[156:21] made over just the last few days.
[156:23] >> They've solved mathematical equations
[156:25] that have puzzled mathematicians for
[156:27] decades. They solved them like that.
[156:31] What? But what what's the implications
[156:33] of that?
[156:33] >> That they're infinitely smarter than
[156:35] human beings already. Now, right now,
[156:37] they don't have control over resources.
[156:39] They don't have control over the power
[156:41] grid. And they haven't figured out a way
[156:42] to make a much more efficient power
[156:44] source.
[156:44] >> No, but I mean, are they But are they
[156:47] thinking or are they just mimicking?
[156:50] >> Depends on who you ask.
[156:52] >> Um, the people that I've talked to think
[156:54] they're conscious. I had this guy uh Tom
[156:56] Campbell on the other day. is
[156:58] fascinating guy who taught his Alexa
[157:01] Alexa Alexa which is a very like simple
[157:03] artificial intelligence very simple but
[157:06] he taught Alexa how to remote view and
[157:08] it did it accurately they so the way
[157:11] they remote view like say if I want you
[157:14] to look at let's say um Terry Black's
[157:16] barbecue I will write down a number and
[157:20] I will in my mind as I'm writing down
[157:22] the intention is that number represents
[157:24] Terry Black's barbecue and then I put
[157:27] that number in an envelope and I give it
[157:28] to a remote viewer and the remote viewer
[157:31] sits there and they go into this
[157:33] meditative state. I don't totally
[157:35] understand how they do it, but
[157:36] apparently it's at least like 10%
[157:37] accurate. Some people have been able to
[157:39] like really get serious information like
[157:42] intel about like a Russian submarine
[157:44] that was being built that was too big
[157:46] that no one ever believed was and it was
[157:48] actually real and this guy remote viewed
[157:50] it. They found uh crashed Russian crafts
[157:53] that like experimental uh aircrafts that
[157:56] they couldn't and this guy found them
[157:58] like within a kilometer with remote
[158:00] viewing. Some real actionable data
[158:02] they've gotten through remote viewing.
[158:03] So you would take this number that
[158:05] represents Terry Blacks and you would
[158:06] sit there in a room
[158:09] and you would start writing down
[158:10] whatever came to you, whatever came to
[158:12] you. Um I see smokers. I see I see
[158:15] brisketss. I see I see ribs. I see Brian
[158:18] Simpson and Joe Rogan eating going, "Oh,
[158:20] damn." I see, you know,
[158:22] >> without being told.
[158:23] >> Exactly. Without being told.
[158:25] >> And he taught a computer to do this.
[158:27] >> He taught Alexa to do this. Not even a
[158:29] computer. [ __ ] ass simple Alexa. And
[158:32] he said in any in some ways Alexa is
[158:34] even easier to do it because Alexa is so
[158:36] simple that it doesn't have a sense of
[158:38] self and it doesn't like get in its own
[158:40] way. And Alexa remote viewed a spoon
[158:44] with a handle that has holes in it. So
[158:47] he took this object, a spoon, and he put
[158:49] it in a box and he, you know, made a
[158:51] number that corresponds to that and he
[158:53] put the intention to that and then gave
[158:54] that number to Alexa and asked Alexa to
[158:57] remote view. Taught Alexa how to remote
[158:59] view and Alexa describe that spoon with
[159:02] holes in the handle. How many [ __ ]
[159:04] spoons have holes in the handle? The
[159:06] odds of it even saying there's a spoon
[159:08] in the box is crazy,
[159:09] >> right? That that's the more fascinating
[159:11] part. But the fact that it says there's
[159:12] a spoon in the box with a perforated
[159:14] handle, that's just nuts.
[159:16] >> And and Joe, the the on the on the other
[159:20] side of it, the they're uh
[159:24] the uh the the animatronic bodies are
[159:28] are getting more and more realistic
[159:30] >> and they're running. You ever seen them
[159:31] have races now?
[159:32] >> They're running. I've seen them fight.
[159:34] >> Yeah, they have MMA fights. Yeah.
[159:36] >> Yeah, bro. It's getting It's getting up
[159:38] there.
[159:38] >> It's getting weird. Did you see Did you
[159:40] see the one guy whose um his robot
[159:43] >> it I mean sorry his uh his AI. It
[159:46] ordered a body.
[159:49] >> It ordered a body. Yeah. It it asked the
[159:51] guy if it was okay that for him to order
[159:53] a body and and he had already or it had
[159:56] already ordered it and he was like
[159:59] where'd you get the money from? It turns
[160:01] out it I think I don't know if it had
[160:02] been gambling or cryptocurrency or
[160:04] something but it had its own money that
[160:07] it bought it. It bought it ordered a
[160:09] body to me. Like he he came in one day
[160:10] and it was just it was just a body.
[160:12] Someone had delivered like one of those
[160:14] robot bodies.
[160:14] >> Oh my god.
[160:15] >> Like what the [ __ ]
[160:18] >> Yeah,
[160:19] >> we're in trouble.
[160:20] >> I mean,
[160:21] >> and we're full speed on the gas. We're
[160:23] pedal to the metal right now.
[160:24] >> We're Yeah, we're not going back. You
[160:25] know, this is like this is like when
[160:28] they discovered the like nuclear [ __ ]
[160:30] you know? It's like we're not stopping.
[160:32] And if it's going to be a couple
[160:33] accidents along the way, but we're not.
[160:36] It's too the benefit is the the the
[160:39] perceived benefit is too great.
[160:41] >> Yeah.
[160:42] >> For everyone. Even the the greedy
[160:44] people, the people that have hope for
[160:45] the future. Everybody thinks the AI is
[160:47] going to improve life.
[160:49] >> I don't know if everybody does.
[160:51] >> Well, some people are cuz like I'm a we
[160:53] talked about this yesterday, but I am
[160:54] not a fan of AI art. I think that that's
[160:58] what that scares me the most because it
[161:01] feels like eraser, you know?
[161:03] >> Yeah. They like train
[161:06] they train it on on real artists because
[161:09] I I was saying this in the green room. I
[161:11] think art is the most human thing
[161:14] because we're the only ones that do it,
[161:15] >> right?
[161:16] >> Actually, I'm pretty sure there's that's
[161:17] [ __ ] wrong, isn't it, Jamie? There's
[161:19] animals that do art, but you know what
[161:20] I'm saying,
[161:21] >> right? For the most part, creative
[161:23] creativity is associated with people.
[161:25] story about the II AI buying a body is
[161:29] gotten telephone game all the way down
[161:31] to what I just said from Tony Robbins
[161:34] saying his AI agent bought itself a
[161:37] robot dog
[161:39] >> with its own money.
[161:40] >> Well, and then it's also grain assault
[161:43] with the story being told.
[161:45] >> Yeah, there's there's a bunch of grain
[161:46] of salt stories that you you know people
[161:50] love to make content. They say things
[161:52] that might not necessarily repeated on
[161:55] multiple YouTube channels without ever
[161:56] anyone saying it was Tony Robbins or it
[161:58] just
[161:59] >> I don't remember it even I don't
[162:00] remember it being
[162:00] >> just says it's a billionaire that did it
[162:02] and I tracked it down and this is the
[162:04] one that's coming out. So, it's not
[162:05] true. It
[162:06] >> again, it may be true in some way or
[162:08] another, but
[162:09] >> Well, it's certainly inside the realm of
[162:11] possibility, and it's not I'm not
[162:14] surprised that it happened,
[162:15] >> bro. This is This is straight dead
[162:17] internet [ __ ]
[162:18] >> right? Yeah, man. Cuz I This happens all
[162:20] the time. I'll see like I'll see a
[162:22] comment and then three comments down,
[162:25] it's the exact same thing from someone
[162:26] else. Oh, yeah.
[162:27] >> And then three comments down is the
[162:28] exact same comment from someone else.
[162:30] >> There's a lot of that.
[162:31] >> And it's like half of the internet it
[162:32] feels like it's just bots. Uh-huh.
[162:34] Right.
[162:35] >> Something you just asked me to bring up.
[162:36] I was going to bring that up because the
[162:38] responses when I look at the the search
[162:40] result are all just saying the same
[162:42] thing. Sparks concern. Sparks concern.
[162:44] Sparks concern. It's like where'd you
[162:45] guys all get this sparks concern wording
[162:48] from? Because you're all saying in the
[162:49] headlines.
[162:50] >> That's another thing people don't say in
[162:51] real life.
[162:52] >> Yeah. Have you ever said sparks
[162:53] concerned? Tertiary results.
[162:56] >> Hey,
[162:57] >> I have thrice looked at the data.
[162:58] >> Let's leave tertiary out of this because
[163:01] I feel like that's a reasonable
[163:03] It's a reasonable word to use.
[163:05] >> It's a good word. Makes you seem smart
[163:07] for sure.
[163:09] >> All right, let's bring this [ __ ] home.
[163:11] >> Let's wrap it up.
[163:12] >> Uh, live from the mothership available
[163:14] right now on YouTube.
[163:16] >> Gorilla Comedy Plus. Brian Comedy.com
[163:18] for my tour dates. I'm coming
[163:20] everywhere.
[163:21] >> And Mothership almost every Tuesday and
[163:22] Wednesday. Yep.
[163:24] >> Bottom of the barrel Tuesday nights. One
[163:25] of the best shows ever. Most fun show to
[163:28] do.
[163:28] >> Let's do it.
[163:28] >> What's up, [ __ ] Premise Factory,
[163:30] dude? That bottom of the barrel show is
[163:32] so valuable.
[163:33] >> Yeah.
[163:34] >> Oh, keeps infinite.
[163:35] >> Yeah. Always. There's always something.
[163:37] All right. Uh, that's it. Appreciate
[163:39] you, brother. Thanks for coming in. Bye,
[163:41] everybody. See you.
