Home Depot, Phrase Deploy GenAI to Cut Costs and Speed Workflows

Cutting-Edge Applications of Generative AI in the Enterprise — Ai4

Ai4

Enterprise AI adoption succeeds only when companies solve specific user friction points and measure performance through actual business outcomes rather than volume metrics.

AI-assisted summary of Cutting-Edge Applications of Generative AI in the Enterprise — original source. Check the original for full context.

Source published:

Detailed notes

## Background Published on YouTube by Ai4 on August 21, 2026, this panel discussion highlights enterprise leaders showcasing real-world business transformations driven by generative AI. Moderated by Elaine Reyes, the session features technology executives from The Home Depot, Phrase, and Argos Multilingual sharing practical deployment strategies that deliver measurable value across operations.

## TL;DR Enterprise technology leaders Franziska Bell, Semih Altinay, and Raffaele Pascale explore how their organizations move generative AI past proof-of-concept into high-impact production workflows. Key deployments include Phrase's autonomous app-provisioning tool Launchpad, Home Depot's automated blueprint takeoffs and store voice agents, and Argos Multilingual's multi-expert LLM benchmarking pipelines. The discussion examines organizational change management, shifting pricing and KPIs from raw output volume to commercial outcomes, and the technical hurdles of multimodality. Looking ahead 12 to 18 months, the panel anticipates breakthroughs in autonomous AI judges and dynamic hyper-personalization while acknowledging persistent challenges in spatial reasoning.

## Atmosphere & style The panel carries a crisp, pragmatic, and candid tone that bypasses generic AI hype in favor of grounded operational realities and engineering trade-offs. Elaine Reyes moderates with brisk pacing, fostering an open environment where panelists share authentic war stories—from non-technical executives unexpectedly building their own software to Geoffrey Hinton's struggles using LLMs for shed design. It feels like an insider executive briefing, blending collegial humor with sharp, data-backed insights on overcoming organizational friction and delivering enterprise value.

## Key takeaways - [02:16](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=136s) Enterprise language intelligence and localization have evolved beyond rigid neural machine translation to contextual GenAI models that dynamically adapt tone, style guides, and demographic targeting. - [02:16](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=136s) The Home Depot is deploying domain-specific generative tools, such as automated blueprint takeoffs and conversational voice agents, to streamline complex contractor workflows and reduce retail friction. - [02:16](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=136s) Validating generative enterprise research agents requires multi-expert blind evaluation rubrics, where analyzing reviewer disagreement is often more instructive than overall aggregate quality scores. - [07:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=476s) Overcoming internal skepticism succeeds through targeted, granular automations that remove daily pain points rather than broad top-down mandates. - [12:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=727s) Leadership actively modeling AI tool usage and instituting structured frameworks, such as Phrase's five-tier 'AI fluency ladder', drives widespread organic adoption across non-technical departments. - [12:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=727s) Agentic customer support workflows that unify context across fragmented platforms like Zendesk, Jira, and Slack can cut ticket resolution times from an hour down to minutes. - [13:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=829s) Multimodal localization must balance high-touch human polish for permanent cornerstone assets with rapid automated turnaround for high-turnover ephemeral media. - [17:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1043s) High-fidelity multimodal AI requires extensive ground-truth data curation and human annotation to prevent hallucinations across noisy video, audio, and visually embedded text. - [23:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1387s) Justifying enterprise AI budgets requires shifting from legacy volume metrics (such as words translated or minutes transcribed) to tangible business outcomes and market expansion results. - [26:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1561s) Radical efficiency gains in content processing and transcription are driving commercial models away from fragmented hourly or per-word rate cards toward unified, outcome-based credit systems. - [28:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1720s) Enterprise implementations should prioritize acute user pain points and run transparent early adopter programs to avoid developing solutions that fail final evaluation thresholds. - [31:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1902s) Near-term AI frontiers over the next 12 to 18 months focus on overcoming spatial and physical reasoning bottlenecks, developing reliable autonomous AI judges, and scaling dynamic hyper-personalized content.

## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=4s) Panel Introductions: Language Intelligence, Retail Scale, and Output Quality

Moderator Elaine Reyes opens the session by inviting the panelists to introduce themselves, their organizations, and their current strategic mandates. Semih Altinay introduces himself as the Vice President of AI Solutions at Phrase, an enterprise language intelligence platform. Altinay explains that Phrase provides the technical backbone for global enterprises—including Salesforce, Uber, and TripAdvisor—that translate billions of words each year, ensuring their brand messaging is communicated accurately and seamlessly across worldwide audiences.

Dr. Franziska Bell, Chief Technology Officer at The Home Depot, reflects on her return to the Ai4 conference and outlines her organizational remit leading product management, UX, data, AI, and technology. Bringing a rich background from previous leadership roles at Ford, Toyota, BP, and Uber, Bell explains that Home Depot approaches artificial intelligence with a cross-enterprise operational lens: deployment spans interconnected store operations, heavy supply chain logistics, and customer-facing digital platforms, with an unwavering focus on generating tangible business value for both retail associates and end customers.

Rounding out the panel, Raffaele Pascale introduces himself as the Director of Innovations, Solutions & Engineering at Argos Multilingual. Drawing on Argos’s thirty-year history in translation and a dedicated data services division launched a decade ago for labeling, annotation, and custom dataset curation, Pascale highlights their core contemporary challenge: enterprise validation. While generative models make it trivial for anyone to produce synthetic content at scale, Argos focuses on objectively assessing whether an LLM's output actually meets enterprise quality and accuracy thresholds.

- **Semih Altinay (Phrase):** Enterprise language intelligence platform handling billions of translated words annually for clients like Uber, Salesforce, and TripAdvisor. - **Dr. Franziska Bell (The Home Depot):** CTO overseeing product, UX, data, AI, and engineering across stores, supply chains, and digital ecosystems; previously at Ford, Toyota, BP, and Uber. - **Raffaele Pascale (Argos Multilingual):** Leading innovation and engineering; leverages thirty years of language domain expertise and ten years of data labeling to validate enterprise LLM outputs.

---

[02:16](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=136s) Production GenAI Use Cases: Internal App Provisioning, Blueprint Takeoffs, and Agent Evaluation

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Enterprise LLM Research Agent Evaluation Pipeline subgraph GEN["Report Generation"] A["User Query"] --> B["Research Agent"] B --> C["20-Page Synthesized Report"] end

subgraph EVAL["Expert Human Evaluation"] D["Benchmark Tasks & Rubrics"] --> E["Blind Pass: Expert Reviewer A"] D --> F["Blind Pass: Expert Reviewer B"] C --> E C --> F end

subgraph QA["Enterprise Validation"] E --> G["Disagreement Analysis"] F --> G G --> H["Scored & Calibrated Enterprise Dataset"] end ```

Moving into real-world deployments, Elaine Reyes prompts the panel to detail concrete generative AI initiatives, the business bottlenecks they resolve, and their measurable returns. Semih Altinay presents two distinct Phrase initiatives. Internally, Phrase engineered "Launchpad," an autonomous internal tooling agent. Employees describe what they need built in natural language, and Launchpad automatically provisions and deploys the application with "no engineering tickets." Since March, non-technical teams across the company have spun up 114 bespoke production applications: the marketing team launched a venue-sourcing platform for corporate events, the legal department deployed an agentic version-control tool, and the Chief People Officer's team built an internal employee survey tool that completely replaced an expensive third-party SaaS subscription. Externally, Altinay contrasts modern GenAI capabilities with the neural machine translation (NMT) pipelines of a decade ago. While older NMT engines were fast and scalable, they were stubbornly rigid. Today, Phrase injects deep contextual instructions—the exact style guides, brand voices, and formality cues historically passed to human linguists—allowing models to dynamically adapt copy for hyper-targeted demographics, such as drafting specifically for "Gen Z" or tailored directly to "women over the age of 40 living in Argentina."

Dr. Franziska Bell outlines two high-impact Home Depot applications bridging digital assistance and professional trade workflows. For everyday consumers, Home Depot launched "Magic Apron," an AI-powered virtual home improvement expert designed to guide shoppers through complex product discovery, technical troubleshooting, and personalized step-by-step DIY project planning. For professional contractors and trade builders, Bell highlights two heavy-duty generative tools: "blueprint takeoff" and the "material list builder." In standard construction workflows, contractors invest painful hours manually analyzing architectural blueprints for a single-family home or renovation project to calculate exact dimensional takeoffs. Home Depot's AI tooling analyzes the blueprint files directly, automatically generating a comprehensive bill of materials with precise quantities, SKU mappings, and live pricing in a fraction of the historical turnaround time.

Raffaele Pascale shifts to third-party model governance, describing how Argos Multilingual benchmarks autonomous enterprise research agents. Clients increasingly deploy agents that scrape the web and compile exhaustive twenty-page research reports, yet verifying the factual fidelity of these long-form outputs at enterprise scale creates a severe bottleneck. Argos deploys subject matter experts to design manual baseline research tasks and comprehensive evaluation rubrics measuring relevance, factual accuracy, and instruction-following. Independent evaluators then conduct blind evaluations of the agent-generated reports. Pascale emphasizes that tracking inter-annotator disagreement during these blind reviews is often far more instructive than the aggregate quality score itself, as it isolates ambiguous source interpretations. This methodology has produced thousands of hours of rigorous human-expert evaluation datasets, giving clients statistical proof of whether their models are enterprise-ready before public deployment.

- **Phrase Launchpad Adoption:** 114 internal tools deployed without engineering tickets since March across People, Legal, and Marketing teams. - **Home Depot Blueprint Takeoffs:** Generates full bill-of-materials and quantity-priced itemizations from architectural plans for residential pros. - **Argos Agent Benchmarking:** Multi-expert blind evaluation runs analyzing 20-page research agent outputs for hallucination and rubric alignment.

---

[07:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=476s) Crossing the Chasm: Overcoming Cultural and Operational Friction in Enterprise Scaling

Elaine Reyes directs the conversation to one of the central roadblocks in modern AI adoption: moving applications past proof-of-concept into full enterprise-wide scale while managing organizational resistance and operational friction. Raffaele Pascale shares an internal transformation story from taking over Argos's engineering team six months prior. Initially, the engineers were apprehensive and skeptical of AI, worrying that the models could not reliably match human standards. Rather than imposing a top-down mandate, Pascale implemented targeted automations account by account, isolating and removing the most repetitive, painful daily manual tasks. As the team tracked their saved hours, their posture flipped from resistance to active experimentation, generating 60 custom engineering automations within six months. Pascale shares a favorite example involving project delivery delays: rather than automating an apology email from engineers to production staff, they built a live, AI-powered visibility dashboard tracking engineering deliverables in real time. Pascale notes, "the problem actually is not the technology but the ownership of it."

Dr. Franziska Bell emphasizes that enterprise scaling succeeds only when organizations anchor implementation entirely in the customer and associate journey. Examining Magic Apron's user data, Home Depot uncovered a foundational split between their two primary customer cohorts. The standard do-it-yourself consumer approaches Magic Apron looking for visual inspiration, browsing large product catalogs, and seeking approachable guidance. In contrast, professional contractors demand speed, maximum efficiency, and ruthless technical precision for high-stakes projects on rigid deadlines. The panel trades banter over this distinct division, noting that just as DIYers and contractors use completely separate checkout registers in physical Home Depot stores, their digital interfaces must reflect those diverging mindsets. Bell underlines that scaling AI requires meeting users where they are rather than forcing a monolithic experience.

Semih Altinay corroborates that Phrase’s primary hurdles were cultural rather than technical or architectural, dividing the workforce between aggressive early adopters and conservative skeptics. To build broad cultural buy-in, Phrase relied on visible executive leadership from the top. Altinay recounts that Phrase's CEO had never written a single line of software code in his life before February, but embraced agentic tooling so aggressively that he quickly became the organization's single highest token consumer, demonstrating hands-on commitment to AI transformation across the entire enterprise.

- **Argos Engineering Transformation:** 60 workflow automations built over six months by focusing on granular employee pain points instead of sweeping top-down mandates. - **Home Depot Cohort Bifurcation:** DIY shoppers seek exploratory inspiration and education; commercial pros require immediate, highly precise, task-oriented execution. - **Phrase Leadership Buy-In:** The CEO went from having zero coding experience prior to February to being the company's highest token spender, establishing an enterprise-wide mandate through active usage.

[12:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=727s) The AI Fluency Ladder and Agentic Support Workflows

Leadership modeling plays a massive role in enterprise AI adoption. When executive leaders visibly experiment, fail, and iterate in public—even if other engineers are consuming half the tokens while delivering sharper results—it establishes a culture where employees feel compelled to dive in. To operationalize this mindset across the company, Phrase introduced a structured, five-level framework known as the "AI fluency ladder." While the spectrum ranges from level zero ("nothing") up to level five ("multiplier"), with intermediate tiers like "adopter" and "builder," the organization established a strict deadline mandating that every single employee reach at least level two: "proficient."

Rather than forcing AI through top-down mandates, teams are encouraged to showcase organic wins. A prime example highlighted during a company-wide all-hands meeting came from customer support. Support specialists historically juggled a fragmented labyrinth of systems—including Zendesk, Jira, Confluence, Datadog, and Slack—attempting to aggregate context manually and retain it in their heads before devising a solution or routing tickets. To eliminate this cognitive overload, the support team engineered an agentic workflow that connects these disparate repositories. Because the AI retains total system recall, resolution times dropped precipitously from 30 to 60 minutes down to just 5 to 10 minutes, empowering frontline staff to solve complex, unfamiliar issues effortlessly.

- **AI Fluency Ladder Tiers**: Level 0 (no adoption), Level 1 (adopter), Level 2 (proficient — company-wide mandate), Level 3 (builder), up to Level 5 (multiplier). - **Integrated Systems**: Zendesk, Jira, Confluence, Datadog, and Slack unified into a single agentic retrieval interface. - **Support Velocity Metric**: Ticket resolution times plummeted from 30–60 minutes to 5–10 minutes.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Agentic Support Workflow Transformation subgraph Legacy["Legacy Manual Workflow (30-60 mins)"] A["Customer Ticket"] --> B["Manual Search Across Silos<br/>(Zendesk, Jira, Confluence, Datadog, Slack)"] B --> C["Mental Context Synthesis & Guesswork"] C --> D["Slow Escalation / Resolution"] end subgraph Agentic["Agentic AI Workflow (5-10 mins)"] E["Customer Ticket"] --> F["Autonomous Context Retrieval Agent"] F --> G["Unified Synthesis & Exact Root Cause Identification"] G --> H["Rapid Resolution by Frontline Associate"] end ```

---

[13:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=829s) Multimodal Explosion: Adapting Video, Voice, and Ephemeral Content at Scale

Addressing the shift beyond text-based LLMs toward multimodal artificial intelligence (incorporating image, video, and speech), enterprise leaders see fundamental shifts in content delivery and localization. The localization industry has long handled software strings, UI text, video transcription, dubbing, and subtitling across dozens of target markets, but the current surge in short-form, video-first channels has dramatically raised the stakes. Even professional feeds like LinkedIn have morphed into video-centric platforms resembling Instagram, generating massive volumes of content that must be adapted globally at rapid speed.

This shift forces organizations to evaluate ephemeral content versus permanent brand assets. High-stakes assets, like primary website landing pages and cornerstone marketing campaigns, warrant exhaustive human polish. Conversely, high-turnover ephemeral media—such as real-time social video coverage surrounding events like the FIFA World Cup—requires rapid, automated turnaround at scale. Generative AI allows localization pipelines to ingest multimedia inputs directly, identifying on-screen elements, voice nuances, and local context to make creative assets culturally resonant without requiring manual production from scratch.

---

[15:33](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=933s) Multimodal Home Improvement: Voice AI and Blueprints at The Home Depot

Home improvement retail is inherently multimodal. Customers do not simply arrive with a clean text query; they walk into physical aisles holding a broken refrigerator light bulb, upload job-site photos, submit complex architectural blueprints for professional construction projects, or send unstructured voice memos describing project specifications to request accurate cost estimates.

To tackle these high-friction touchpoints, The Home Depot rolled out conversational AI voice agents directly across its store phone channels. Previously, callers encountered cumbersome interactive voice response (IVR) phone trees—"press one for store hours"—forcing users to memorize numeric options or forget whether they needed option two or three. The modern voice agent interprets natural language and intent within seconds. It resolves store hour inquiries, assists callers in assembling digital shopping carts, initiates service requests, or smoothly escalates the call to a store associate with full context. This eliminates friction for customers seeking quick answers while untethering physical store associates from ringing desk phones, allowing them to dedicate their focus to shoppers standing in store aisles.

---

[17:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1043s) Ground-Truth Data Curation and the Mosaic Workflow

Multimodality presents distinct operational hurdles that standard foundation models cannot handle out of the box. Today's commercial LLMs frequently hallucinate or fail when interpreting visual media because they lack grounded contextual comprehension. To train models effectively, human-in-the-loop engineering teams must label and annotate thousands of hours of video frame-by-frame—such as cataloging every specific athletic action across diverse sports broadcasts—effectively teaching models "how to watch a video."

Similar training bottlenecks exist in audio and imagery:

- **Noisy Body-Camera Audio**: Models fail when applied to real-world operational environments. Annotators transcribe and label chaotic body-camera footage characterized by loud background ambient noise and multiple people talking over each other simultaneously. - **Visual Context Translation**: Text embedded inside graphics often fails during direct translation because off-the-shelf engines cannot perceive the visual context of the accompanying image. - **Mosaic AI Suite**: Argos Multilingual implemented an end-to-end translation ecosystem composed of **Mosaic Editor** (an AI-powered linguistic workbench) and **Mosaic** (an automated linguistic quality assurance tool) across 150 languages.

Output fidelity is entirely dependent on training dataset quality: "It's not what actually the AI writes, but it's actually what the AI understands."

---

[19:16](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1156s) Cultural Adaptation and Automated Recap Generation

Multimodal AI is transforming creative asset management through hyper-targeted cultural adaptation and media repurposing. Beyond text translation, global visual campaigns must respect diverse regional norms. An advertisement featuring a hamburger with bacon may resonate in Western markets, but bacon is culturally unacceptable in parts of the Middle East, where it must be swapped for chicken; similarly, beef imagery requires replacement when marketing in India. Rather than staging separate photo and video shoots for each geography, generative models can modify visual elements within existing creative assets to align with local sensitivities.

Agentic systems also eliminate manual production bottlenecks in entertainment streaming workflows. When streaming services launch a new season (e.g., season five of an established show), marketing teams routinely assemble five-minute "recap reels" recapping earlier plotlines. Historically, editors spent days manually searching archives across seasons one through four, finding specific clips, matching them to existing time-coded subtitles, and pulling localized audio dubbing tracks. Modern agentic workflows ingest the entire repository, extract the requested narrative moments, align existing localized subtitles and voice tracks, and stitch the recap together in minutes without requiring costly re-subtitling or re-dubbing.

---

[20:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1246s) Measuring AI ROI: Friction Reduction Across 2,300 Stores

When justifying generative AI investments to corporate boards and executive committees, business metrics extend well beyond traditional software ROI and top-line financial return. At enterprise scale, reducing operational friction for both customers and frontline associates serves as a primary performance metric:

``` Total Value = Direct Financial Return + Friction Reduction (Hours Saved + Workflow Acceleration) ```

For The Home Depot, small efficiency gains compound dramatically across its footprint of 2,300 North American store locations and billions of annual customer interactions:

- **Blueprint Takeoffs for Pros**: Generative vision and estimation tools slash multiple hours off the time professional contractors spend manually calculating materials lists from blueprints. - **Frontline Task Offloading**: Deploying autonomous voice agents to field customer calls liberates thousands of associate hours previously spent answering phone trees, redirecting that labor directly to customer assistance on the retail floor. - **Compounding Impact**: Minor incremental improvements in task speed, intent resolution, and data accuracy generate massive enterprise value when multiplied across thousands of physical locations.

---

[22:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1338s) Organic Enterprise Buy-In: The Non-Technical Builder

The cultural tipping point for generative AI often emerges from unexpected quarters within an organization. While visiting Phrase's office in Hamburg, Semih was approached by the company's Chief People Officer for a private discussion:

> "She literally just said, 'Hey, can we talk?' and I got worried, right? It's the chief HR officer. I'm like, am I in trouble?"

Far from an administrative or disciplinary talk, she was eager to demonstrate an AI application she had designed and built independently. Traditionally, human resources leaders manage personnel workflows without writing software or architecting technical pipelines. Seeing a non-technical executive transition from an administrative operator into an active software builder showcases how accessible agentic tools have democratized technical problem-solving across modern enterprise organizations.

[23:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1387s) Justifying AI Budgets and Shifting from Output Metrics to Business Outcomes

The discussion tackles the financial reality of generative AI in the enterprise: building and deploying it is expensive, requiring technology leaders to justify investments with hard evidence of return. Semih Altinay highlights a fundamental shift in how teams justify their AI spend both internally and externally. Internally, tools must "earn their keep" by tangibly improving employee productivity. Externally, the metrics for client-facing translation and localization have transformed completely. Rather than billing by volume—such as words translated per year or minutes of audio transcribed—the focus is now entirely on business outcomes. Customers do not buy translation for its own sake; they buy international expansion, such as whether they can successfully launch and sell a product in Brazil or drive adoption in Japan. Budget approvals hinge on proving these downstream commercial results.

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: Shift from Legacy Volume Metrics to Outcome-Based Value subgraph Legacy["Legacy Output Metrics"] direction TB A["Word Counts Translated"] B["Minutes Transcribed"] end subgraph Modern["Outcome-Based AI Value"] direction TB C["Market Expansion (e.g., Brazil)"] D["Product Adoption (e.g., Japan)"] E["Measurable Productivity Gains"] end Legacy -.->|"Shifted to"| Modern ```

Raffaele Pascale agrees, describing his framework for securing investment based on three core pillars: quality, tool usability, and internal impact. In the modern AI paradigm, quality is no longer a subjective matter of opinion but a strict, automated binary threshold: "is a pass or fail." If an AI output fails to meet pre-agreed benchmark standards, the asset simply is not shipped. For internal proposals, Raffaele takes a data-driven approach to the CFO, presenting precise monthly metrics per tool and per client rather than vague future promises: "I give you numbers to get numbers back."

- **Outcome-focused KPIs**: Measuring AI success through actual commercial enablement (e.g., entering new regional markets) rather than raw word counts or processing units. - **Raffaele’s Three Evaluation Pillars**: Quality (pass/fail benchmarking), usability of tools, and organizational impact. - **CFO Engagement**: Securing budget allocations by delivering granular performance metrics across monthly runs, specific tools, and individual client accounts.

---

[26:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1561s) Evolving Business Models: Credit-Based Pricing and Labor Economics

As generative AI accelerates across industries, traditional commercial and pricing structures are rapidly breaking down. Semih Altinay explains how his organization dismantled legacy pricing tiers—which previously charged separately for machine translation units, AI compute units, audio/video transcription minutes, and platform access fees. Because modern enterprise workflows demand multimodality without friction, they switched to flexible credit-based, outcome-driven pricing.

Semih illustrates the economic disruption using transcription labor economics: historically, an agency transcriber charging $10 per minute of audio would bill $600 for a one-hour video because manual transcription required four hours of intensive human labor ($150 per hour). If modern AI tooling enables that same one-hour video to be accurately transcribed and reviewed in just an hour and fifteen minutes, charging the legacy $600 output fee no longer aligns with the actual economics. Raffaele adds that these AI-enabled efficiencies are transforming internal sales organizations, forcing sales teams to listen more closely to clients who expect immediate turnaround ("I want this yesterday") and equipping them to sell entirely new, high-velocity product offerings.

- **Unified Credit Pricing**: Eliminating fragmented fees across machine translation, AI tokens, and platform tiers in favor of unified consumption credits. - **Disruption of Legacy Rate Cards**: Re-evaluating fixed per-minute/per-word fees as human turnaround time shrinks from four hours down to 75 minutes. - **Commercial Agility**: Sales teams shifting focus toward real-time problem solving and faster time-to-market products.

---

[28:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1720s) Advice for Enterprise Implementers: Problem-First Focus and Early Adopter Programs

When asked for a single actionable piece of advice for leaders launching their first enterprise-wide generative AI initiative, the panel unanimously cautions against technology-first experimentation in search of a problem. Franziska Bell emphasizes starting directly with the end user—whether that is an external customer or an internal frontline associate. Identifying genuine, acute friction points eliminates the challenge of organizational change management: "if you are truly solving a pain point a person has, they will tear it out of your hand and there is no adoption problem."

Raffaele Pascale reinforces this warning, pointing out that teams often rush to engineer full-scale solutions from scratch without deeply evaluating the root problem, only to discover at evaluation time that the output fails user expectations and must be completely rebuilt. Semih Altinay advises launching an Early Adopter Program (EAP) early in development. Enterprise teams should recruit forward-thinking internal users or progressive clients willing to test incomplete, autonomous, or "headless" agentic workflows—and actively incentivize them to be vocal and transparent about every bug, limitation, and workflow flaw.

- **User-Centric Discovery**: Deeply analyzing frontline associate and customer friction before writing code or selecting models. - **Preventing Rework**: Conducting rigorous upfront problem scoping to avoid building end-to-end pipelines that fail final evaluations. - **Transparent Early Adopter Programs (EAPs)**: Running internal and client beta programs to uncover architectural and UX edge cases before broad rollout.

---

[31:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1902s) 12-to-18-Month Outlook: Spatial AI, Autonomous AI Judges, and Dynamic Content

Looking ahead over the next 12 to 18 months, the panelists highlight emerging AI frontiers that are currently constrained by model limitations. Franziska Bell identifies Spatial AI—encompassing precise dimensional measurements, physical reasoning, and spatial awareness—as a crucial yet unsolved domain. She recounts a conversation earlier that day with deep learning pioneer Geoffrey Hinton, who shared a personal anecdote about attempting to use an LLM to help design a backyard shed, only to discover the model consistently failed at physical and spatial reasoning constraints.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Key Near-Term AI Frontiers and Bottlenecks subgraph Spatial["Spatial AI & Physical Reasoning"] S1["Dimensions & Measurements"] S2["Structural Reasoning (e.g., Hinton's Shed Example)"] end subgraph Autonomous["Autonomous AI Judges"] A1["Unsupervised Quality Control"] A2["Eliminating Human-in-the-Loop Bottlenecks"] end subgraph Media["Dynamic Hyper-Personalized Media"] M1["Real-Time Content Generation"] M2["User-Controlled Narrative Variables (e.g., Tone/Intensity)"] end ```

Raffaele Pascale points to the ongoing reliance on human checkpoints, expressing eagerness for a reliable, standalone "AI judge" capable of evaluating quality, fine-tuning accuracy, and governing complex workflows completely autonomously without human-in-the-loop intervention—a capability currently hindered by messy, unstructured enterprise data. Semih Altinay challenges the notion that full autonomy is years away, predicting that fully autonomous agents operating with near-zero human input will arrive within 12 to 18 months. Semih also envisions a radical shift in multimedia consumption: dynamically generated media where viewers can adjust content parameters in real time, such as dialing violence or thematic elements up or down while watching the exact same film.

- **Spatial AI Limitations**: Current large models struggle with spatial geometry, physical dimensions, and real-world construction logic. - **Autonomous AI Judges**: The quest to replace human-in-the-loop evaluation steps with reliable, self-governing evaluation agents. - **Dynamic Content Personalization**: Real-time narrative adaptation that tailors content intensity, tone, and pacing to individual viewer preferences.

[34:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=2062s) The Rise of AI-Driven Hyper-Personalization

Semih Altinay envisions the next frontier of customer experience as the shift from static, one-size-fits-all delivery toward dynamic, deep contextual adaptation. Highlighting how modern AI tools increasingly understand the distinct profile of each user, he points to consumer media consumption as a primary example—whether tailoring a viewing experience for an adult couple sitting together or adjusting content ratings and themes when a teenager is watching. This capability extends directly to web and enterprise environments, where two people browsing the same destination will encounter completely different presentations tailored specifically to their individual context and preferences.

Importantly, this transformation bridges localization and behavioral targeting. Altinay illustrates this nuance through native language delivery: even if two users are consuming content in the exact same language, such as Turkish, the AI will adapt the messaging and presentation so that each person sees something distinct. Historically, adapting a single creative asset or web layout manually for every individual persona was cost-prohibitive and operationally impossible. Over the next 12 to 18 months, however, generative AI and enterprise automation will finally remove that friction, enabling content producers to generate bespoke, hyper-personalized variations at scale.

- **Context-aware experiences:** AI systems increasingly discern environmental and demographic context, such as adapting media playback depending on whether an adult couple or an adolescent is viewing. - **Beyond translation:** "We're both seeing the same thing in Turkish, but you're seeing something a little bit different because it's personalized to you." - **Adoption horizon:** Expect "hyperpersonalization" driven by AI generation and automated pipelines to become mainstream over the next 12 to 18 months, freeing creators from the bottleneck of manual per-person adaptation.

[35:17](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=2117s) Panel Conclusion and Audience Networking

Elaine Reyes brings the panel to a close a few minutes ahead of schedule, deliberately leaving open floor time so attendees can network and interact directly with the speakers before the next conference track begins. She invites audience members to come up off-stage to ask lingering questions, continue conversations, or pitch their own ideas to the enterprise leaders. She asks the room for a final round of applause to thank panelists Raffaele Pascale, Franziska Bell, and Semih Altinay for sharing their real-world enterprise AI perspectives.

## Notable quotes > [02:16](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=136s) no engineering tickets — Semih Altinay

> [07:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=476s) the problem actually is not the technology but the ownership of it. — Raffaele Pascale

> [17:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1043s) It's not what actually the AI writes, but it's actually what the AI understands. — Raffaele Pascale

> [22:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1338s) She literally just said, 'Hey, can we talk?' and I got worried, right? It's the chief HR officer. I'm like, am I in trouble? — Semih Altinay

> [23:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1387s) is a pass or fail — Raffaele Pascale

> [23:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1387s) I give you numbers to get numbers back. — Raffaele Pascale

> [26:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1561s) I want this yesterday — Raffaele Pascale

> [28:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1720s) if you are truly solving a pain point a person has, they will tear it out of your hand and there is no adoption problem. — Franziska Bell

> [34:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=2062s) We're both seeing the same thing in Turkish, but you're seeing something a little bit different because it's personalized to you. — Semih Altinay

## Mentioned Ai4, Argos Multilingual, BP, CGTN, Confluence, Datadog, Elaine Reyes, Ford, Franziska Bell, Geoffrey Hinton, Hackensack Meridian Health, Instagram, Jira, Launchpad, LinkedIn, Magic Apron, Mosaic, Mosaic Editor, Phrase, Raffaele Pascale, Salesforce, Sameer Sethi, Semih Altinay, Slack, The Home Depot, Toyota, TripAdvisor, Uber, Zendesk

## Video description Franziska Bell - CTO, The Home Depot Sameer Sethi - SVP, Chief AI & Insights Officer, Hackensack Meridian Health Semih Altinay - VP AI Solutions, Phrase Raffaele Pascale - Director of Innovations, Solutions & Engineering, Argos Multilingual Elaine Reyes - News Anchor, CGTN

Generative AI is no longer just a research breakthrough. It's powering some of the most innovative business transformations in the world. In this high-energy panel, enterprise leaders and technologists will showcase cutting-edge use cases driving real results today. From AI-powered product design and marketing personalization to legal document generation and autonomous customer support, panelists will highlight where gen AI is delivering breakthrough value. This session will leave you inspired by what’s possible and armed with ideas you can take back to your team.

[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA)

中文简报

家得宝与Phrase部署生成式AI以降低成本并加速工作流 企业采用AI要想取得成功,唯有解决特定用户痛点,并通过实际业务成果而非单纯的体量指标来衡量绩效。 企业技术领导者 Franziska Bell、Semih Altinay 和 Raffaele Pascale 深入探讨了各自机构如何推动生成式 AI 跨越概念验证阶段,落地于高影响力的生产工作流中。关键部署包括 Phrase 的自主应用配置工具 Launchpad、家得宝(Home Depot)的自动化图纸算量与门店语音智能体,以及 Argos Multilingual 的多专家大语言模型(LLM)基准评测流水线。讨论审视了组织变革管理、将定价和关键绩效指标(KPI)从单纯的产出体量转向商业成效,以及多模态技术面临的障碍。展望未来 12 至 18 个月,专家组预计自主 AI 评判与动态超个性化将取得突破,同时指出空间推理领域仍存在持续挑战。 企业语言智能与本地化已超越刻板的神经机器翻译,演进为能动态调整语调、风格指南和目标受众定位的上下文生成式 AI 模型。 (2:16) 家得宝正在部署特定领域的生成式工具(如自动化图纸算量和对话式语音智能体),以简化承包商的复杂工作流并减少零售摩擦。 (2:16) 验证企业级生成式研究智能体需要多专家盲审评估标准,在此过程中,分析评审人员之间的分歧往往比总体综合质量得分更具启发意义。 (2:16) 消除内部怀疑态度的有效途径是推行解决日常痛点的针对性细粒度自动化,而非自上而下的宽泛行政指令。 (7:56) 领导层以身作则使用 AI 工具并建立结构化框架(如 Phrase 的五级“AI 熟练度阶梯”),有力推动了非技术部门广泛自发地采纳与应用。 (12:07)

Reading summary

Enterprise generative AI adoption succeeds only when anchored in acute operational friction and measurable business outcomes rather than technological novelty. Leaders from The Home Depot, Phrase, and Argos Multilingual emphasize that scaling requires pairing bottom-up organizational fluency with rigorous output validation and outcome-aligned commercial models. Targeting Operational Friction Across Enterprise Workflows (2:16) Concrete enterprise value emerges from deploying AI directly against painful workflow bottlenecks. Dr. Franziska Bell describes how The Home Depot automated blueprint takeoffs and materials list estimation for professional contractors, converting complex architectural plans into itemized bills of materials with SKU mappings and real-time pricing. Across Home Depot's 2,300 physical stores, conversational voice AI replaced legacy interactive voice response trees, answering customer queries and freeing retail floor associates from phone duties to assist in-aisle shoppers directly. Internally, Phrase deployed an agentic platform called Launchpad that enables non-technical personnel to build software using natural language. The system has provisioned 114 production tools without engineering tickets since March, including a corporate event venue finder and an HR survey application that eliminated a third-party software contract. In customer support, an agentic retrieval pipeline unifies Zendesk, Jira, Confluence, Datadog, and Slack, shrinking ticket resolution times from 30–60 minutes down to 5–10 minutes. Overcoming Cultural Resistance Through Practical Fluency (7:56) Cultural hesitation frequently presents a greater scaling barrier than underlying model architectures. Raffaele Pascale notes that engineering skepticism at Argos Multilingual subsided only when management targeted repetitive, manual irritants account by account, yielding 60 customized engineering automations within six months. Bell corroborates that solving genuine user pain points neutralizes adoption resistance, noting that Home Depot deliberately segmented its AI interfaces between exploratory DIY shoppers and speed-oriented commercial contractors. To institutionalize adoption, Phrase established a five-tier "AI fluency ladder" mandating that all employees reach at least Level 2 ("proficient"). This initiative was supported by top-down executive experimentation; Phrase's CEO had no software development experience prior to February but became the company's highest token consumer through direct agentic tool usage, legitimizing hands-on experimentation across non-technical departments. Ground-Truth Validation and Multimodal Quality Bottlenecks (17:23) As multimodal generative models ingest diverse inputs—including architectural blueprints, product imagery, and live audio—data verification becomes a decisive operational hurdle. Standard foundation models frequently hallucinate when interpreting visual or noisy acoustic data, such as embedded graphic text or multi-speaker body-camera audio. To establish ground truth across 150 languages, Argos Multilingual deployed its Mosaic AI workbench alongside specialized human annotation teams to train models on video and audio context. Pascale emphasizes that assessing complex agentic outputs requires structured evaluation rubrics rather than basic scoring. When benchmarking autonomous research agents compiling 20-page dossiers, Argos deploys independent subject matter experts to run blind reviews. Rather than relying on aggregate quality metrics, the teams evaluate inter-annotator disagreement to uncover ambiguous interpretations, enforcing a binary pass/fail benchmark before models can touch production workflows. Realigning Commercial Models from Volume to Outcomes (23:07) Generative efficiencies are fundamentally disrupting legacy enterprise rate cards and commercial pricing. Semih Altinay observes that pricing models based on processed volume—such as word counts or transcription minutes—are decoupling from production economics. For example, when generative tools reduce the labor required to transcribe a one-hour video from four human hours to 75 minutes of assisted review, charging historical per-minute service rates becomes economically obsolete. In response, service providers are collapsing fragmented charges for machine translation units, AI compute tokens, and platform tiers into unified, credit-based consumption models. Budget justifications are shifting away from internal output metrics toward commercial business outcomes, such as accelerating foreign market entry in Brazil or driving user adoption in Japan. Pascale notes that justifying AI spend to CFOs now requires monthly, tool-level performance data tied directly to quality thresholds and operational time savings. Emerging Frontiers and Physical Reasoning Constraints (31:42) Looking 12 to 18 months forward, enterprise leaders anticipate substantial advancements alongside unresolved technical boundaries. Altinay projects the arrival of fully autonomous enterprise agents operating with near-zero human oversight, alongside dynamically generated media capable of real-time parameter tuning and localized hyper-personalization. Pascale identifies the need for autonomous "AI judges" capable of evaluating workflow outputs without human-in-the-loop bottlenecks, though messy unstructured data remains an obstacle. Conversely, Bell highlights spatial AI as a vital yet unsolved constraint for physical retail and construction. Citing an account from deep learning researcher Geoffrey Hinton regarding an attempt to design a backyard shed, Bell emphasizes that current large models consistently fail at physical geometry, real-world dimensions, and structural reasoning constraints. While generative AI delivers quantifiable velocity gains across document synthesis, customer support, and bespoke internal tooling, enterprise maturity requires navigating shifting labor economics and strict verification rubrics. Unresolved limitations in physical and spatial reasoning underscore that foundation models remain uneven, necessitating targeted, problem-first deployment over generalized technological adoption.

精炼阅读摘要

来自 Phrase、The Home Depot 与 Argos Multilingual 的企业技术领袖指出,生成式人工智能在企业的落地重心已从技术概念验证转向解决一线业务阻力,其评估标准亦从单纯的产出数量转向可衡量的商业结果与效率提升。 垂直业务落地与多模态流程重构 (2:16) 企业推进生成式人工智能的关键在于将其嵌入具体业务流程。The Home Depot 首席技术官 Franziska Bell 博士介绍,该零售集团根据客群进行针对性部署:面向普通家庭 DIY 消费者提供导购与规划助手 Magic Apron;面向专业建筑承包商推出施工图拆解(blueprint takeoff)与物料清单生成工具,AI 可直接解析建筑图纸并输出包含精准 SKU 与实时定价的物料清单,免去了承包商繁复的手工核算。此外,门店部署的自然语言语音代理有效分流了营业时间与购物车相关来电,使实体店员工免于接听琐碎电话,专注于店内现场顾客。 在语言智能与内容生产端,Phrase 副总裁 Semih Altinay 说明了内部自主代理 Launchpad 的成效:员工仅凭自然语言描述即可部署工具,自 3 月以来各非技术部门已自主上线 114 个生产级应用,涵盖法务版本控制以及完全替代昂贵第三方 SaaS 的员工调查系统。在多模态内容交付方面,生成式模型不仅能根据区域规范修改视觉要素(如根据中东或印度市场替换广告中的肉类图像),还能在数分钟内自动抓取历史剧集片段、对齐多语言字幕与音轨,自动拼装出剧集回顾视频,大幅替代了耗时数天的跨部门手动剪辑。 克服组织文化阻力与推行素养阶梯 (7:56) 企业规模化应用 AI 的最大瓶颈通常来自组织文化而非底层技术。Argos Multilingual 创新总监 Raffaele Pascale 回顾接管工程团队的经验指出,消除工程师抵触情绪的有效路径是针对最枯燥的日常痛点进行渐进式自动化,该团队在六个月内开发了 60 项工程自动化功能。Pascale 认为推进转型的关键在于帮助员工建立对技术的主人翁意识,而非推行自上而下的行政命令。 Phrase 则通过建立从 0 级(无应用)到 5 级(乘数效应)的“AI 流畅度阶梯”(AI fluency ladder),强制要求全员达到 2 级(熟练级)。高管以身作则为全员试错树立了标杆——其 CEO 在此前毫无编程经验的背景下,从 2 月起通过高频实验成为全公司 Token 消耗最多的人。在自驱文化下,Phrase 客服团队自主构建了打通 Zendesk、Jira、Confluence、Datadog 与 Slack 的代理检索系统,使疑难工单的平均处理时间从原先的 30 至 60 分钟骤降到 5 至 10 分钟。 重构商业模式与成效导向的投资回报 (23:07) 生成式 AI 的普及正在动摇传统的工时计费与按量收费模式。Altinay 举例说明,过去 1 小时音频转录需要 4 小时人工投入并收取 600 美元费用,而在 AI 辅助下该任务可在 75 分钟内完成,这导致传统以分钟或词数为基准的费率表脱离实际劳动经济学。Phrase 为此取消了割裂的机器翻译、算力单元与音频转录分项收费,转向统一的消耗积分制与成效定价。 在投资回报率(ROI)评估上,指标正从翻译字数等过程量转向下游商业结果,例如产品是否成功进军巴西或日本等目标市场。Pascale 强调,向首席财务官(CFO)争取 AI 预算必须提供基于每月工具与客户维度的精细量化指标;在成果验收层面,质量不再依赖主观评判,而是设定严苛的自动化“通过或失败”(pass/fail)二元基准,未达标资产一律不得交付。 模型评估治理瓶颈与未来前沿展望 (31:42) 大规模部署自主代理面临的主要瓶颈在于事实校验。Pascale 指出,客户利用代理自动生成 20 页研究长文时存在严峻的事实核验挑战;Argos 采用多领域专家对代理生成内容开展双盲评审,其核心价值在于通过分析标注员之间的分歧来定位歧义并构建校准数据集。对于视觉理解与执法记录仪音频等高噪环境,标准基础模型频现幻觉,仍高度依赖数千小时的人工精细标注来进行语境微调。 展望未来 12 至 18 个月,与会者指出了关键突破方向与现有边界。Bell 指出当前大模型缺乏“空间智能”(Spatial AI)与物理常识推理能力,并援引 Geoffrey Hinton 使用 LLM 辅助设计后院工具棚因忽视空间几何限制而失败的案例。Pascale 期待开发出能脱离人工监督、自主执行质检与微调的“AI 裁判”(AI judge);Altinay 则预测近乎零人工干预的完全自主代理即将问世,并预测能够根据受众身份和偏好实时调整内容基调与画面的超个性化(hyper-personalization)生成技术将成为主流。 企业生成式 AI 正在由技术尝鲜走向以减少业务阻力和创造实际价值为核心的深水区,但大模型在物理空间推理上的局限、对人工标注与验证闭环的持续依赖,以及企业非结构化数据治理的复杂性,仍是迈向高阶完全自主系统的主要挑战。

Detailed notes — zh

## Background 该视频由频道 Ai4 于 2026 年 8 月 21 日发布在 YouTube 平台上。页面简介显示,本场圆桌论坛汇聚了来自 The Home Depot、Phrase 和 Argos Multilingual 等行业领先企业的技术高管,重点展示生成式 AI 如何从实验室突破走向企业级商业转型,涵盖产品设计、营销本地化、物料清单自动化生成与客服支持等落地案例与前沿成果。 ## TL;DR 本期圆桌讨论聚焦生成式 AI 在企业真实业务场景中的规模化落地实操。The Home Depot 首席技术官分享了面向普通消费者的虚拟家装系统 Magic Apron 以及面向专业承包商的蓝图自动化物料清单工具;Phrase 介绍了内部自主部署微应用的 Launchpad 平台以及多模态、细分画像级的内容本地化重构;Argos Multilingual 则深入剖析了大模型自动化评估的盲测机制、数据标注难点以及计费模式向成果导向的演进。此外,嘉宾们还就化解组织文化阻力、衡量落地 ROI 以及空间 AI 与超个性化内容的未来发展展开了务实探讨。 ## Atmosphere & style 整场圆桌讨论节奏紧凑、干货密集,洋溢着浓厚的一线实战与工程落地氛围。主持人 Elaine Reyes 控场干练,引导三位来自不同业务领域的嘉宾展开深度观点碰撞,没有虚泛的概念炒作,而是处处围绕真实的工时数据、Token 消耗、算法评估阈值以及组织推行阻力展开剖析。对谈氛围兼具专业度与务实幽默,既有管理层以身作则的生动轶事,也有对 AI 物理建模局限的坦诚反思,给听众带来极为真实且具启发性的企业 AI 转型全景透视。 ## Key takeaways - [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=4s) 大语言模型(LLM)生成内容的门槛已大幅降低,企业落地 Gen AI 的核心挑战已转向如何客观评判生成质量并建立严格的准入机制。 - [02:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=129s) Phrase 自研 Launchpad 平台赋能非技术职能部门(HR、法务、市场)自主搭建 114 个微应用,摆脱了对技术团队工单交付的依赖。 - [02:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=129s) 生成式 AI 打破了传统机器翻译的僵化规则,能够根据细分受众画像(如特定年龄层或国家地区)精准适配本地化语调与风格。 - [04:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=288s) 家得宝(The Home Depot)打造面向普通用户的虚拟家装专家 Magic Apron 以及面向施工承包商的蓝图自动化物料清单(BOM)生成工具,显著缩减工程核算工时。 - [05:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=356s) 针对长篇调研报告等 AI 生成物,Argos 建立专家双盲交叉评审机制,通过深入剖析专家分歧点沉淀出高标准的质量评估数据集。 - [07:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=476s) 跨越原型到规模化的组织阻力,需要从员工最痛苦的机械化痛点入手进行渐进式自动化,并结合高管以身作则与客群精细化洞察。 - [12:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=727s) 企业推进 AI 采纳可设定量化的熟练度阶梯(如 Phrase 要求全员限时达到 Level 2),并通过直观展示业务成效激发自主转型。 - [12:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=727s) 多系统协同的智能体(Agentic)架构打破了数据孤岛,将客服排查与跨平台工单解决时长从 30 至 60 分钟大幅压缩至 5 至 10 分钟。 - [13:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=829s) 多模态 AI 能够以极低成本对短时效音视频内容进行批量化本地化,并可动态替换画面中违背文化禁忌的元素(如肉类替换)。 - [15:33](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=933s) 家得宝上线自然语言 AI 语音坐席替代传统多层级电话按键树(IVR),不仅提升了秒级响应效率,也释放了店内员工专注服务实体顾客。 - [17:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1043s) 多模态落地高度依赖高质量真实场景的数据工程(如对重度嘈杂执法仪音频和赛事视频帧打标),输出质量完全取决于训练数据质量。 - [20:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1246s) 在拥有 2,300 家门店的庞大零售网络中,算法在解决率和响应速度上的微小百分比提升都会在规模效应下释放出巨大的商业价值。 - [23:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1387s) AI 商业模式与预算论证正从传统的按字数/按时长计费,全面转向统一积分制(Credit-based)以及直接对齐业务 KPI 的成果导向定价(Outcome-based)。 - [28:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1720s) 初涉企业级 Gen AI 落地应聚焦真实使用者的核心痛点,并通过早期尝鲜计划(EAP)保持对系统缺陷的透明度以实现快速闭环迭代。 - [31:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1902s) 空间智能(Spatial AI)与物理几何度量仍是当前大模型的硬核瓶颈,完全无需人类在环的独立 AI 裁判在短期内仍难以彻底成熟。 - [34:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=2062s) 超个性化(Hyperpersonalization)预计在未来 12 至 18 个月迎来爆发,AI 将以极低边际成本实现千人千面的动态内容生成与界面交互。 ## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=4s) 嘉宾介绍与企业业务背景 主持人 Elaine Reyes 宣布圆桌讨论正式开始,并邀请各位嘉宾依次介绍各自的身份、所属公司及目前推进的核心工作。首先发言的是来自语言智能平台 Phrase 的 AI 解决方案副总裁 Semih Altinay。他介绍道,Phrase 为 Salesforce、Uber、TripAdvisor 等全球知名企业提供底层技术支撑,每年协助处理数十亿词量的翻译任务,确保企业精准传达品牌形象与信息。 紧接着,家得宝(The Home Depot)首席技术官 Fran Bell 进行了自我介绍。她曾先后任职于 Ford、Toyota、BP 及 Uber 等企业,目前在家得宝统领产品、用户体验(UX)、数据、AI 与整体技术团队。Fran Bell 强调,家得宝在人工智能领域的首要任务是将 AI 技术贯穿渗透到实体门店、供应链以及线上数字化体验的全流程中,为广大消费者和一线员工创造实打实的业务价值。 最后,Argos Multilingual 创新、解决方案与工程总监 Raffaele Pascale 介绍了公司的深厚背景。Argos Multilingual 在语言服务领域深耕近 30 年,并在 10 年前拓展了数据服务业务,专注于数据标注、注释以及数据集构建。他指出,团队当前面临的最大挑战在于如何客观评判大语言模型(LLM)生成内容的优劣,因为“在当下人人都能用 LLM 生成内容的时代,核心门槛在于如何确保生成内容的真正质量”。 --- ### [02:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=129s) 生成式 AI 落地用例:Phrase 的内部 Launchpad 与外部本地化适应 针对主持人关于“近期上线或正在构建的生成式 AI 具体项目及其量化业务成效”的提问,Semih Altinay 分享了 Phrase 在内部提效与外部赋能两个维度的生动案例。在内部协作方面,他们自主研发了一款名为 Launchpad 的平台,员工只需向 AI Agent 描述自己的构想,Agent 就会自动完成开发、资源调配和部署上线,全程无需向工程团队提交技术工单。令人惊喜的是,非技术部门表现出了极高的创造力:市场部经理开发了一款自动筛选活动场地的应用;法务团队构建了法务版本控制的 Agent 方案;人力资源团队则自研工具直接替代了过去昂贵的付费第三方员工调研软件。 在对外业务层面,生成式 AI 彻底打破了传统神经机器翻译(NMT)的机械僵硬。以往哪怕将品牌调性、文风偏好(正式或非正式)等详细背景信息告知人工翻译专家,产出仍可能出现偏差或疏漏;而现在的生成式 AI 能够完美吸收海量上下文与规范,不仅能流畅翻译,还能针对特定受众进行精准的内容本地化改编——例如定制面向“Z 世代”或“阿根廷 40 岁以上女性群体”的特定沟通语调,实现了前所未有的细腻表达。 - **Launchpad 内部成效**:自 3 月上线以来,全公司各部门已自主部署了 114 个不同的微应用。 - **全员参与**:涵盖法务、人力资源、市场营销等多个非工程技术职能部门。 - **受众定制能力**:支持基于年龄、地区、受众画像等多维度的细粒度语气与风格重写。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Phrase Launchpad 与生成式 AI 应用流 subgraph Internal["Phrase 内部敏捷应用:Launchpad"] A["业务员工输入需求描述"] --> B["AI Agent 自动编写代码"] B --> C["云资源自动配置与部署"] C --> D["交付 114+ 内部微工具<br/>(场地筛选/法务版本/HR调研)"] end subgraph External["Phrase 外部多语言内容处理"] E["品牌声音与风格上下文"] --> F["大模型深度理解与翻译"] G["细分受众画像 (如地区/年龄)"] --> F F --> H["高度拟人化与本地化内容输出"] end ``` --- ### [04:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=288s) 家得宝的生成式 AI 实践:Magic Apron 与专业客户蓝图物料清单工具 Fran Bell 分享了家得宝在生成式 AI 领域的两项核心落地应用。首先是面向大众消费者的“Magic Apron”(魔法围裙)——这一以家得宝标志性橙色围裙命名的虚拟专家系统由人工智能驱动,能够为顾客提供端到端的家装升级与 DIY 指导,涵盖精准的商品发现以及个性化的项目施工建议。 针对家得宝极为重视的专业客户群(Pro 客户,如承包商与建筑工),团队重点攻克了蓝图估算与物料清单生成(Blueprint Takeoff & Material List Builder)。在过去,专业客户购买或翻修房屋时,需要耗费大量时间人工测量图纸并逐项核算所需的建筑材料、规格数量及预算总价。现在借助生成式 AI,系统可直接识别工程蓝图并自动化生成精确的材料清单与报价明细,将原本耗时数小时乃至数天的繁琐核算压缩到极短的时间内完成。 - **Magic Apron**:兼顾商品推荐、流程指引与交互式项目问答的虚拟家装专家。 - **蓝图清单构建工具**:自动解析工程蓝图,快速输出物料清单(BOM)、所需数量与价格估算。 - **服务群体覆盖**:同时赋能普通 DIY 消费者与专业施工承包商两大核心客群。 --- ### [05:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=356s) Argos Multilingual:大模型评估基准与专家盲测验证 Raffaele Pascale 聚焦于行业普遍面临的“AI 评估困境”展开阐述。当前许多企业都在研发各类调研 Agent(Research Agent)或客服 Agent。以能够自主联网检索信息并自动撰写分析报告的研究型 Agent 为例,模型单次可能生成长达 20 页的复杂研报,但面对成千上万份报告的大规模生产,人类管理者根本无法逐一通读以核实其真实准确性。 为了解决这一痛点,Argos Multilingual 建立了一套严密的专家评测机制。行业专家首先人工编写标准研究任务并建立评分细则(Rubric),从相关性、事实准确性、指令遵循度等维度进行定义;随后由多名专家采用“独立双盲评审”(Blind Pass)方式对 Agent 生成的报告进行交叉评分。Raffaele 强调,专家评审之间的“意见分歧”(Disagreements)往往比单一评分更为关键,能够精准暴露出模型在极端边界情况下的缺陷,从而沉淀出数千小时的高价值评估数据集,帮助客户明确判断模型是否真正具备上线投产的能力。 - **核心挑战**:AI 生成内容易,但证明其质量达标、事实准确极其困难。 - **评测流程**:构建人工标准任务与评分准则 $\rightarrow$ 专家独立双盲交叉审核 $\rightarrow$ 深度分析专家分歧点。 - **交付价值**:沉淀包含数千小时专家智慧的高标准评估数据集,作为模型投产准入的权威依据。 --- ### [07:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=476s) 从试点走向规模化:攻克文化与流程摩擦的落地实战 主持人抛出了一个行业核心痛点:将生成式 AI 应用从“试点原型阶段”推进到“全企业级规模化落地”往往会遭遇严重的文化与组织运营阻力。各嘉宾就如何化解此类阻力分享了切身体会。 Raffaele Pascale 讲述了自己约半年前接管工程团队时的内部破冰经历。起初工程师普遍对 AI 怀有疑虑和抗拒,担心输出质量不可靠。他没有采取强硬的大规模推广,而是逐个业务账户梳理工程师日常最繁重、最痛苦的机械工作并进行精准自动化,同时量化展示节省的工时。半年下来,团队共构建了 60 项自动化流程。态度也发生了 180 度大转弯——原先抵触的成员开始主动提出利用 AI 优化流程的新想法。他提到一个典型案例:过去工程师经常要就延期交付问题向生产部门发邮件汇报沟通,团队并未选择“用 AI 自动写邮件”,而是直接搭建了一个由 AI 驱动的实时交付与工作流看板,让生产团队实时自助查看,从根源上消除了沟通摩擦。Raffaele 总结道:“核心阻碍往往不是技术本身,而是团队对技术的拥有感与掌控感。” Fran Bell 则从客户洞察的角度阐述了规模化的关键。她强调,家得宝的底层逻辑是始终从用户旅程出发去理解痛点与诉求。以“Magic Apron”为例,团队发现 DIY 普通用户与 Pro 专业客户的诉求截然不同:DIY 用户希望获得灵感启发,享受浏览丰富商品的过程;而 Pro 客户背负着严苛的工期与工程截稿日,要求极度精准、高效和直接的答案。这种深刻的客群区分正是确保 AI 顺利从原型走向规模化的基石。 Semih Altinay 补充指出,Phrase 在推广中遇到的主要是文化层面的保守与怀疑态度,而公司破局的“第一杠杆”就是高层以身作则——例如此前从不写代码的 CEO 自 2 月起亲自带头尝试,如今甚至成为了全公司大模型 Token 消耗量最高的用户。 - **渐进式自动化与工时量化**:Argos 团队在 6 个月内落地 60 个自动化流程,成功消除工程师的抵触心理。 - **痛点根除替代形式主义**:用实时数据看板替代低效的人工/AI 延期汇报邮件。 - **双重用户画像差异化运营**:DIY 用户注重“灵感启发与商品探索”,Pro 承包商追求“精准交付与极致效率”。 - **高层示范效应**:CEO 亲自躬身入局成为主力 Token 使用者,从顶层扫除文化推行阻力。 ### [12:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=727s) 企业内部推广 AI:领导表率、熟练度阶梯与智能体实战 谈及如何在组织内部推动 AI 采纳,Semih Altinay 强调了高层亲自下场示范的力量。当全公司最核心的高管公开且透明地展现自己如何摸索、试错甚至遭遇失败时,普通员工便没有理由退缩——即便有些工程师私下笑称他们只用高管一半的 Token 消耗量就能写出更好的代码。除了高层表率,团队还制定了一套包含五个等级的“AI 熟练度阶梯”(AI fluency ladder),从零基础(0 级)到初级采用者(1 级),再到掌握熟练技能的“精通者”(Proficient,2 级),其后还有构建者(Builder,3 级)乃至倍增者(Multiplier,5 级)。公司明确给出了截止期限,要求全员必须达到 2 级熟练水平。 在推行策略上,团队秉持“展示成果,而非强行推销”(Show don't try to force)的原则。客户支持团队的实践便是一个绝佳范例:过去遇到客户投诉或技术工单时,客服人员必须在 Zendesk、Jira、Confluence、Datadog 以及 Slack 等大量系统之间反复跳转、收集碎片化信息,不仅极耗脑力,还容易遗漏。如今,他们构建的 Agentic(智能体)解决方案能自主完成跨系统查询与归纳。AI 永不遗忘信息的特性,将原本需要 30 到 60 分钟的处理流程大幅压缩至 5 到 10 分钟。甚至一位对某个故障毫无背景知识的员工,也能在 AI 辅助下轻松定位并解决问题。 ```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: 客服工单排查智能体化流程 subgraph Legacy["传统人工模式(耗时 30-60 分钟)"] A1["多系统跨平台查询<br/>(Zendesk/Jira/Datadog/Slack)"] --> A2["人工记忆与脑力拼接"] A2 --> A3["跨团队沟通协调与人工解决"] end subgraph Agentic["Agentic 智能体模式(耗时 5-10 分钟)"] B1["智能体统一抓取上下文"] --> B2["AI 记忆聚合与方案推导"] B3["新人亦可直接快速闭环"] B1 --> B2 --> B3 end ``` - **熟练度考核**:推行五级“AI 熟练度阶梯”,硬性设定截止时间要求全员达到 Level 2(Proficient)。 - **提效幅度**:工单平均排障解决时长从 30~60 分钟骤降至 5~10 分钟。 - **跨平台融合**:智能体打破了 Zendesk、Jira、Confluence、Datadog、Slack 等多系统之间的数据孤岛。 --- ### [13:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=829s) 翻译与本地化领域的多模态爆发:从海量短视频到文化适配 主持人 Elaine Reyes 抛出疑问:随着多模态 AI(融合图像、视频与语音)迅速成熟,它将如何颠覆不同行业的产品设计、营销与客户服务?Semih 回应道,语言服务与本地化行业历来就不是单纯的文字交互,而是涵盖软件 App 字符、音视频转录、字幕配制以及配音的全链条业务。如今数字内容呈爆炸式激增,以 LinkedIn 为例,其信息流已经酷似 Instagram,充斥着海量短视频。企业面临巨大的两难:像世界杯这样时效极短的“即时性内容”(Ephemeral content),很难让企业投入高昂预算与时间进行精工细作,但完全不本地化又无法触达受众;而多模态生成式 AI 正好补足了这一缺口,能够自动将音视频与图像快速转化为符合目标市场语境的高质量素材。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 影视剧集回顾剪辑智能体生成流程 subgraph Repo["历史资产库 (Seasons 1-4)"] R1["过往成片视频切片"] R2["既有本地化字幕库"] R3["既有多语种配音轨"] end subgraph Agent["多模态智能体检索与处理"] AG1["根据营销需求定位高光片段"] AG2["自动对齐已有对应字幕与语音"] AG3["智能拼接生成 5 分钟 Recap Reel"] end R1 --> AG1 R2 --> AG2 R3 --> AG2 AG1 --> AG3 AG2 --> AG3 AG3 --> Out["免重新听翻/配音,数天工作量缩至即时交付"] ``` Semih 还补充了多模态 AI 解决文化禁忌与跨媒体检索的惊人能力。例如某张汉堡营销图里若包含培根,AI 可以智能识别并将其替换为鸡肉以适配中东市场,或避免在印度市场使用牛肉素材。而在长视频剪辑场景中,有流媒体客户在筹备第 5 季上线前需要为前 4 季制作一段 5 分钟回顾混剪(Recap reel),过去营销团队需要翻阅数天的素材库去手工截取片段、匹配原有字幕与配音,费时费力;如今 Agentic 解决方案可直接定位特定剧情并自动对齐既有音轨与字幕完成缝合,完全免去了重复制作的巨额成本。 - **内容形态变革**:职场社交平台等媒介全面视频化,多模态驱动短时效内容(Ephemeral content)以低成本实现批量化本地化。 - **图像文化合规**:利用生成式替换能力动态规避文化禁忌(如依据中东或印度市场规范将培根或牛肉替换为鸡肉)。 - **资产重组增效**:自动检索历史剧集字幕与音轨合成精彩回顾,避免翻新制作中的重复劳作。 --- ### [15:33](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=933s) 家居零售的多模态前沿:告别传统电话按键树的语音智能体 Franziska Bell 指出,家装零售(Home Depot)天然具备多模态属性。进店顾客往往拿着从冰箱里拆下的旧灯泡让店员辨识型号;专业承包商(Pro 客户)则在工地现场发来施工现场照片、工程蓝图或一段语音备忘录,要求快速生成项目工程量报价。在各种复杂的多模态应用中,Franziska 特别强调了他们最新部署的 AI 语音坐席系统。过去顾客打电话到本地门店咨询时,面临的是冗长且令人沮丧的多级电话按键树(IVR),诸如“查询营业时间请按 1”等,稍有遗忘就得从头再听一遍。 全新的自然语言 AI 语音坐席彻底消除了这一摩擦点。它能在数秒内精准捕捉用户真实意图,直接回答各类疑难问题,甚至辅助客户搭建数字购物车或发起售后服务工单;若遇到特殊情况,系统亦能无缝转接给店内的人工员工。这不仅为客户省去了听取 1 到 8 号按键指令的痛苦等待,也彻底解放了店内员工,使他们无需频繁被前台电话打断,得以全身心专注于服务实体店面里的现场顾客。 - **多模态输入场景**:兼容实物样本(如特定旧灯泡)、现场施工快照、复杂蓝图纸与语音留言。 - **替代传统按键树**:彻底淘汰多层级数字按键系统,支持秒级自然语言意图理解。 - **端到端闭环**:语音坐席兼备信息查询、线上购物车创建、服务派单以及无缝人机转接等多重能力。 --- ### [17:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1043s) 数据标注实战与翻译全流程工作流:Mosaic 工具链 来自 Argos Multilingual 的 Raffaele Pascale 从数据工程视角分享了多模态背后的残酷现实。多模态 AI 目前并不能凭空理解复杂的物理世界,为此他们团队需要标注长达数小时的体育赛事视频,将屏幕上的每一个动作打上标签,以此“教会 LLM 如何观看视频”。在音频方面,他们对执法执法人员执法仪(Body cameras)录制的重度噪音、多人抢话及兴奋重叠语流进行人工打标清洗,因为“真实世界中人们绝不会一个接一个排队说话”,AI 必须经受这种现实环境的考验。在图像翻译层面,团队同样需要人工修正因模型脱离图像上下文而产生的谬误。 针对端到端的语言服务,Argos 开发了名为 Mosaic 的全套工具矩阵,涵盖 AI 辅助翻译工具 Mosaic Editor 以及 AI 驱动的语言质量保证工具 Mosaic LQA。借助智能体闭环串联,在覆盖 150 种语言的同时坚守严苛的质量底线。Raffaele 直言,生成式 AI 的核心竞争力不仅在于它输出了什么文字,更在于它究竟理解了什么,而“输出质量完全取决于喂给机器的数据集质量”。 | 业务维度 | 传统痛点 / 真实环境挑战 | 多模态与智能体技术解决方案 | |:--- |:--- |:--- | | **视频理解** | 当前模型对连续视频帧缺乏可靠的原生理解 | 标注大量体育赛事逐帧动作,教授 LLM 学会“看视频” | | **真实音频** | 执法仪音频环境嘈杂、多说话人重叠抢话 | 标注文档与噪声语音,提升模型在混乱声学环境下的鲁棒性 | | **图文翻译** | 脱离画面背景时文本直译极易产生歧义 | 结合画面上下文动态矫正图像内文本翻译 | | **质检链路** | 人工逐行校对无法兼顾规模与速度 | 采用 Mosaic Editor + Mosaic LQA 工具套件,智能体闭环管理 150 种语言 | --- ### [20:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1246s) 衡量 AI 价值的业务指标与非预期的员工蜕变 当主持人将话题切入预算审批与董事会汇报时,Franziska Bell 详述了 Home Depot 在传统财务回报率(ROI)之外的核心评估框架:全链路减少客户与员工的体验摩擦。对于专业 Pro 客户,衡量指标是蓝图测算工具帮他们省下了多少工时;对于门店员工,衡量指标则是免于接听繁琐电话、专注于服务现场客户的时间增量。在拥有 2,300 家北美门店、数十亿次交互的大体量规模下,算法在响应速度、准确率和解决率上极其微小的百分比提升,放大到全系统都会沉淀为不可估量的商业价值。 而在被问及推行 AI 以来最意想不到的组织收获时,Semih Altinay 分享了一则趣事。他在访问公司汉堡办公室时,首席人才官(Chief People Officer)突然叫住他神情严肃地说:“我们能聊聊吗?”Semih 一度心惊肉跳地以为自己惹上了人事麻烦,结果对方只是迫不及待地想向他展示自己用 AI 搭建出的全新应用。作为一名此前从未接触过编程与技术开发的典型 HR 高管,她完全凭借直觉成为了积极的“构建者”(Builder)。这种非技术背景管理层发自内心的兴奋与角色蜕变,成为了技术落地过程中最令人惊喜的文化催化剂。 - **巨型零售规模放大效应**:微小的系统提效在 Home Depot 北美 2,300 家门店和数十亿级交互中会产生庞大的复合商业回报。 - **软性体验指标**:重点追踪摩擦消除(Reduction in friction)、工时节约以及一线员工现场服务投入度。 - **自下而上的员工转型**:非技术岗高管自发通过 AI 平台开发工具,由传统职能角色蜕变为技术“构建者”(Builder)。 ### [23:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1387s) AI 预算论证与商业模式重构:从“计字收费”到“业务成果导向” Semih Altinay 直言不讳地指出,AI 技术绝不便宜,企业必须向董事会证明这笔支出物有所值。在内部,论证的核心在于自研工具是否真正“赚回了成本”,能否实质性提升团队生产力;而在外部客户层面,行业的衡量标准发生了根本性颠覆——客户购买的从来不是“翻译”本身(例如每年翻译多少单词或转录多少分钟音频),而是翻译背后的业务成果,例如“能否在巴西顺利开卖产品”或“能否提升在日本市场的渗透率”。因此,预算的合理性直接挂钩于客户商业目标的达成。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 传统计费与 Gen AI 成果导向模式对比 subgraph Legacy["传统模式(按量计费)"] L1["按字数 / 分钟数计费"] --> L2["交付基础文本/音频"] L2 --> L3["工时漫长(如 1 小时音频耗时 4 小时)"] end subgraph Modern["Gen AI 模式(成果/点数导向)"] M1["统一积分制定价 (Credit-based)"] --> M2["AI 大幅提效(缩减至 1 小时 15 分)"] M2 --> M3["直接对齐核心 KPI(如产品海外渗透率)"] end ``` Raffaele Pascale 对此深表赞同,将其形容为一种“数字换数字”(give numbers to get numbers)的置换机制:想要向 CFO 申请预算,就必须拿出坚实的数据。他主要依赖三大指标:质量、工具易用性以及对内部的实际影响力。如今在 AI 加持下,质量不再是主观判断,而是非黑即白的通过/失败(pass or fail)阈值;达不到指标的产品坚决不交付,达不到 ROI 预期的方案坚决不批预算。 针对主持人 Elaine Reyes 提出关于过去一年商业策略如何演变的提问,Semih 进一步解释称,他们已彻底重构了定价机制。以往繁琐的机器翻译单元、AI 单元、音视频时长及平台费等复杂收费项已被全面废除,转而采用更加灵活的**基于积分的定价(Credit-based pricing)**与**基于成果的定价(Outcome-based pricing)**。传统转录员按每分钟 10 美元收费、耗费 4 小时处理 1 小时视频的财务逻辑,在 AI 将处理时间压缩到 1 小时 15 分钟的今天已不再适用。Raffaele 也补充道,这种变革也彻底重构了销售团队的视角与打法,让他们能够以极高的响应速度直击客户痛点。 - **预算论证核心**:向管理层汇报时摒弃虚泛承诺,直接列出每条通道、每个客户、每个月的硬性财务与产出数据。 - **质量考核标准**:设定明确的硬性数值门槛,未达标直接拒绝上线或拒绝拨款。 - **商业模式演进**:告别多模态场景下的计费碎片化,推行跨模态统一积分制与成果交付制。 --- ### [28:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1720s) 落地首个企业级 Gen AI 案例的核心建议:以人为本与早期尝鲜计划 (EAP) 当主持人询问给初涉企业级 Gen AI 的同行有何建议时,嘉宾们一致强调必须回归根本问题。Brian 率先指出,虽然从业务问题出发是常识,但更关键的是**聚焦使用该功能的人**。很多项目失败正是因为脱离了实际用户的痛点。如果一项技术真正解决了内部员工或外部客户的核心痛点,用户会“直接从你手里抢着用”,根本不会存在落地推广困难的问题。 Raffaele 紧接着强调了前期问题评估的重要性。如果未对真实痛点进行透彻剖析就盲目开发,往往会在最终评估时发现输出完全不达预期,导致项目不得不推倒重来。因此,前期深入的问题分析比匆忙写代码更关键。 Semih 提出了极具实操性的落地框架——推行**早期尝鲜计划(Early Adopter Program, EAP)**。他主张在内外部推行 EAP 时必须对系统的缺陷、Bug 与故障保持极致的透明度: 1. **内部公测**:邀请内部员工深度试用并公开吐槽发现的所有问题,以便团队快速迭代修复。 2. **外部前沿客户**:挑选技术敏锐度高、愿意折腾未成熟产品的前瞻型客户,让他们体验完全无头(headless)、完全自主的智能体(Agentic)编排系统,并在收集到海量反馈后迅速完善架构。 --- ### [31:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1902s) 未来 12 至 18 个月的前沿展望:空间 AI、AI 裁判与个性化内容 展望未来 12 到 18 个月内最具潜力但目前尚未成熟的 Gen AI 技术,嘉宾们分享了各自的前沿观察与思想碰撞: - **空间智能(Spatial AI)与物理度量**:Brian 认为在空间尺寸测量与物理环境建模方面,现有模型仍存在显著短板。他分享了当天早些时候与“AI 教父”杰弗里·辛顿(Geoffrey Hinton)的一段私下交流轶事:辛顿提到自己在后院搭建棚屋(shed)时,尝试使用大语言模型辅助计算与设计,结果模型同样在空间度量问题上面临巨大困难,足见空间几何计算是当前 AI 亟待攻克的硬核瓶颈。 - **无需人类介入的独立“AI 裁判”(AI Judge)**:Raffaele 指出,当前大多数自动化 AI 工作流若没有人类在环(Human-in-the-loop)进行校验与微调,就极易失控。由于数据集质量与清洗程度不足,构建一个能够独立评估质量且完全无需人工检查的 AI 裁判仍需数年时间。 - **全自主智能体与“黑镜式”超个性化内容**:Semih 对此提出不同看法,大胆预测在未来 12 到 18 个月内,几乎无需人类干预的完全自主智能体就会变为现实。此外,他还设想了一种极具《黑镜》(Black Mirror)风格的未来内容消费形态:观众在观看同一部电影时,AI 可以根据个人偏好实时动态调整内容呈现(例如依据个人喜好动态增减暴力或动作镜头的烈度)。 ### [34:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=2062s) 超个性化体验与未来12至18个月的内容生成变革 在探讨生成式 AI 对受众体验的重塑时,演讲者以家庭观影和内容消费为例,生动描绘了个性化定制的演进方向。例如同一部影片,在丈夫与妻子共同观看时,或是青少年与成年人分别观看时(对比受限制的 R 级影片),呈现的重点与尺度可能会截然不同。当前的技术工具正在飞速演进,能够深刻理解不同客户与用户的细微需求。未来用户访问同一个网页时,彼此看到的视觉排版与交互内容都会有所区别;即便是两位用户同样阅读土耳其语的内容,呈现在面前的信息也会因个人画像与偏好而产生微妙且精准的差异。 这种深度定制被称为“超个性化”(hyperpersonalization)。演讲者预测,随着底层 AI 模型对用户意图的感知力大幅提升,加之高度成熟的端到端自动化流程,这一趋势将在未来 12 到 18 个月内迎来爆发式落地。在过去,内容创作者哪怕制作出一套优质内容,也很难耗费巨大的人力成本去针对不同人群进行逐一人工适配;而生成式 AI 彻底打破了这一瓶颈,让内容制作者能够以前所未有的极低边际成本,快速生成并分发千人千面的动态内容。 - **超个性化(Hyperpersonalization)落地周期**:预计在未来 12 至 18 个月内成为内容平台和企业营销的标准实践。 - **动态语言与内容适配**:即使在同一种语言(如土耳其语)环境下,系统也能结合用户属性实现千人千面的界面与内容定制。 - **打破内容生产瓶颈**:通过自动化降低以往“逐个用户手动适配”的高昂成本,赋能内容创作者规模化产出个性化内容。 ### [35:17](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=2117s) 论坛总结与台下互动交流 在对未来趋势的展望之后,主持人 Elaine Reyes 宣布圆桌论坛提前几分钟进入尾声,以便为现场参会者留出宝贵的直接交流窗口。主持人向现场观众说明,之所以提早收尾,是为了让大家在赶往下一场分论坛之前,能够有充裕的时间走到台前,与台上几位来自家得宝(The Home Depot)、Argos Multilingual 及 Phrase 等企业的核心技术高管与专家面对面沟通。 无论是想要追问特定的落地技术细节、探讨企业业务转型中的共性挑战,还是现场推介创新方案与业务合作,台下的参会者都可以直接走上台前与专家们交流互动。最后,主持人呼吁全场为在场的演讲嘉宾——Raffaele Pascale、Franziska Bell 与 Semih Altinay 献上热烈的掌声,感谢他们带来关于生成式 AI 落地前沿实践的精彩分享,并正式结束了本场圆桌讨论。 ## Notable quotes > [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=4s) 在当下人人都能用 LLM 生成内容的时代,核心门槛在于如何确保生成内容的真正质量 — Raffaele Pascale > [07:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=476s) 核心阻碍往往不是技术本身,而是团队对技术的拥有感与掌控感。 — Raffaele Pascale > [12:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=727s) 展示成果,而非强行推销 — Semih Altinay > [15:33](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=933s) 查询营业时间请按 1 — Franziska Bell > [17:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1043s) 教会 LLM 如何观看视频 — Raffaele Pascale > [17:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1043s) 真实世界中人们绝不会一个接一个排队说话 — Raffaele Pascale > [17:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1043s) 输出质量完全取决于喂给机器的数据集质量 — Raffaele Pascale > [20:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1246s) 我们能聊聊吗? — 首席人才官 > [23:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1387s) 数字换数字 — Raffaele Pascale > [28:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA&t=1720s) 直接从你手里抢着用 — Brian ## Mentioned Franziska Bell, Sameer Sethi, Semih Altinay, Raffaele Pascale, Elaine Reyes, Geoffrey Hinton, The Home Depot, Hackensack Meridian Health, Phrase, Argos Multilingual, Salesforce, Uber, TripAdvisor, Ford, Toyota, BP, CGTN, Ai4, Launchpad, Magic Apron, Mosaic, Mosaic Editor, Mosaic LQA, Zendesk, Jira, Confluence, Datadog, Slack ## Video description Franziska Bell - CTO, The Home Depot Sameer Sethi - SVP, Chief AI & Insights Officer, Hackensack Meridian Health Semih Altinay - VP AI Solutions, Phrase Raffaele Pascale - Director of Innovations, Solutions & Engineering, Argos Multilingual Elaine Reyes - News Anchor, CGTN Generative AI is no longer just a research breakthrough. It's powering some of the most innovative business transformations in the world. In this high-energy panel, enterprise leaders and technologists will showcase cutting-edge use cases driving real results today. From AI-powered product design and marketing personalization to legal document generation and autonomous customer support, panelists will highlight where gen AI is delivering breakthrough value. This session will leave you inspired by what’s possible and armed with ideas you can take back to your team. [Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONeKLA3aGnA)

Source quotes

[0:04] Raffaele Pascale: 在当下人人都能用 LLM 生成内容的时代,核心门槛在于如何确保生成内容的真正质量 [7:56] Raffaele Pascale: 核心阻碍往往不是技术本身,而是团队对技术的拥有感与掌控感。 [12:07] Semih Altinay: 展示成果,而非强行推销 [15:33] Franziska Bell: 查询营业时间请按 1 [17:23] Raffaele Pascale: 教会 LLM 如何观看视频 [17:23] Raffaele Pascale: 真实世界中人们绝不会一个接一个排队说话 [17:23] Raffaele Pascale: 输出质量完全取决于喂给机器的数据集质量 [20:46] 首席人才官: 我们能聊聊吗? [23:07] Raffaele Pascale: 数字换数字 [28:40] Brian: 直接从你手里抢着用

Source quotes

[2:16] Semih Altinay: no engineering tickets [7:56] Raffaele Pascale: the problem actually is not the technology but the ownership of it. [17:23] Raffaele Pascale: It's not what actually the AI writes, but it's actually what the AI understands. [22:18] Semih Altinay: She literally just said, 'Hey, can we talk?' and I got worried, right? It's the chief HR officer. I'm like, am I in trouble? [23:07] Raffaele Pascale: is a pass or fail [23:07] Raffaele Pascale: I give you numbers to get numbers back. [26:01] Raffaele Pascale: I want this yesterday [28:40] Franziska Bell: if you are truly solving a pain point a person has, they will tear it out of your hand and there is no adoption problem. [34:22] Semih Altinay: We're both seeing the same thing in Turkish, but you're seeing something a little bit different because it's personalized to you.

Original transcript

[0:04] Let's begin guys. Let's start with you. Um Zami,  let's go through and just tell us who you are, [0:09] your company, what you're working  on right now. Sure. Uh Sami Alne, [0:14] VP of AI solutions at Phys. And Freys is a  language um intelligence platform. What that [0:20] means is we produce we help some of the world's  biggest companies, you know, Salesforce, Uber, [0:24] Trip Adviser, anyone and everyone you can  imagine that can do billions of words of [0:28] translation every year. We help them with the  tech so that they can disseminate their image [0:33] uh sorry uh their their message properly. Fran, we  all uh have had some experience with the company [0:41] you work for. Yes, thanks so much for having me.  It's wonderful to be back at AI4. I'm Fran Bell, [0:46] the chief technology officer of the Home Depot.  Um, I have the honor to be leading product, [0:52] UX, data, AI, and technology for the  organization. Before joining the Home Depot, [0:59] um, I had the, uh, real pleasure to be working for  some fantastic companies including Ford, Toyota, [1:06] BP, and Uber. And in terms of our priority as  it pertains to artificial intelligence is we are [1:13] leveraging artificial intelligence across the  enterprise whether it is in the stores supply [1:19] chain or our digital experiences to drive tangible  value for our customers and our associates. Raf. [1:29] Sure. So hi everybody. I'm Rafael Pascal. I  work for Argos multilingual as a director of [1:35] innovation solutions and engineering. We worked  for um like 30 years with languages and since 10 [1:42] years we opened a data service department where  we provide a data labeling annotation creation of [1:49] data sets and our I want to say latest let's say  challenge is to understand if a quality if the [1:57] quality of an output generated from an LLM is good  or not because uh nowadays everybody can generate [2:04] something with LM but we need to guarantee that  it's actually Good. I mean, we have a really [2:09] interesting discussion ahead, a lot that all of  you can get a lot out of. Um, let's begin though [2:16] with real life cases. Walk us through a specific  Gen AI initiative that your team recently launched [2:25] or is actively building and we'd like to hear,  you know, some pretty specific details about the [2:32] business problem that it solves and the measurable  impact that it's driving. We're going to go to all [2:37] of you. So, let's begin with you, Semi. Sure.  So, I actually have two examples, one internal, [2:42] one external. Um, on the internal side, we built  something called Launchpad. And, um, the idea here [2:48] was that people would create um, tools that will  make them more productive in their daily work. So, [2:55] what we did really is um, essentially you tell an  AI agent what you're trying to build. It builds it [3:01] for you. It provisions it for you. And it deploys  it with no engineering tickets. And it's it it [3:07] was super helpful because now since March, we've  already deployed 114 different applications within [3:13] the organization. What's super interesting is that  it's not just engineering teams that are doing [3:18] this. It's the people team. It's the legal. It's  marketing. We have our marketing manager somewhere [3:23] in the audience right now. She built an app that  finds venues for our events. or the legal team did [3:28] this like version control agentic solution for  legal stuff. Uh uh people manage people chief [3:35] people officer and that team built something that  will um it's basically replaced a survey tool that [3:42] we used to pay for. Um and then externally genai  did a lot of things that we couldn't do for years [3:47] and years. So you know 10 years ago we already  had AI in our industry. We had neural machine [3:52] translation but it was rigid. Even though it's  fast, it's scalable, it just couldn't do that [3:58] natural fluid translation. So now we can give it  the same context we used to give the linguists. [4:04] Like we can say here's my brand voice. Here's  the style in which I speak. Make it formal, [4:09] informal. These are the things we used to tell  linguists. And sometimes they would listen, [4:13] sometimes they would make mistakes. But AI can now  ingest all of this information, do the translation [4:18] properly. we can even adapt content and say I  want to talk to Gen Z or I want to talk to you [4:25] know women over the age of 40 living in Argentina  and we can adapt it to that level. Um so those are [4:30] the things that we're working on uh on the Genai  side and I'll just say that's I mean that's great [4:35] that it's so nuanced like that because that's sort  of the complaint right is um AI getting the nuance [4:42] and it has so many different meanings. So thank  you for that. uh a couple of examples from my [4:48] side. Uh the first one I want to share is magic  apron. Uh this is our virtual uh expert as it [4:56] comes to home improvement that is powered through  artificial intelligence and it really helps our [5:01] customers on multiple different fronts including  for example product discovery or personalized [5:08] uh guidance on how to do home and project home  improvement projects. uh as well. Another category [5:15] we have been leaning in quite heavily is for our  pro customers. Um and here we have been recently [5:21] launching capabilities uh such as blueprint  takeoff um or for example a material list builder [5:28] capability. And as a pro, um, you often spend a  lot of time to go from a blueprint, for example, [5:36] for a single family home that you want to buy or  you want to refurbish, um, to actually the list [5:43] of materials that you need with the quantity  and the price. And with these capabilities, [5:48] we're able to support our pro segments uh, in  order to do this in a fraction of the time. [5:56] So my case is actually very external. Uh I bet  that everybody here today are training or building [6:04] an agent like can be a research agent, a support  agent for example. So we are helping one of our [6:11] clients building a research agent for example.  One of those agents where you actually write [6:17] your question and the agent goes online, search  for you the information and generate the reports. [6:22] But now the reports has like 20 pages. So would  you read all the 20 pages to understand if it's [6:28] actually accurate or not or thousands of reports  because you need to scale in a way know your [6:34] company. So that's where our expert steps in.  So our experts prepare like research papers [6:42] or research tasks manually and create a rubric  around uh let's say uh this this research. So to [6:50] understand the relevancy, the accuracy or if the  agent is following instructions. So another than a [6:57] group let's say of experts that's like reviews the  generate the generated reports of those let's say [7:05] uh research tasks that the first one generated.  So they do this independently like as a blind pass [7:12] because we need to understand also if there  is any disagreement because technically the [7:17] disagreements are even more important for the  clients other than the scores themselves. So [7:22] the results is that we have thousands of hours of  experts let's say generating those kind of let's [7:30] say researches converted into a data set ready  for our clients to understand if the model is [7:36] ready or not because as I said before it's very  easy today to generate something with AI but [7:43] almost nobody is able to prove if the quality  is there or not of those generated output. So [7:48] then that's where we step in and it's our job. I  want to pose a question about um you know one of [7:56] the big challenges and feel free to chime in if  if this you know really resonates with you. You [8:01] know moving an AI application from pilot phase  to enterprisewide production is something that [8:08] a lot of companies struggle with. Can you share a  story about a hurdle that you faced when scaling a [8:14] Genai Gen AI application across your org and how  your leadership team overcame that cultural or [8:24] operational friction because we know that there  is friction. Sure. So my example actually is in [8:33] this case internal. So 6 months ago more or less I  took over the engineering team where AI was still [8:41] like a fear for them you know because they were  scared that AI is not really able to generate a [8:47] good output. So what we did we didn't really  go like on a big roll out we started account [8:53] for account taking into account let's say the  most painful tasks that they were doing manually [8:59] on a daily basis and we automated them. Then we  measured the hours that they were saving thanks to [9:04] those automations. And today the team that before  was complaining against AI now is saying oh I have [9:10] suggestions to leverage this kind of AI because  I can do this this and that. So the result is 60 [9:17] automations created in six months that are now are  then working basically for them and helping them [9:23] to scale their job. And my u let's say favorite  example is a tiny one where we had for example [9:31] uh this engineering team sharing with production  uh an email on a daily not a daily basis on a [9:37] time by time when they were delayed with  deliveries. We didn't automate the email [9:42] but we just gave basically to the production a  dashboard where they can see live AI powered all [9:49] let's say the deliverables and all basically um  the engineering workflow. So the problem actually [9:56] is not the technology but the ownership of it.  Love that story. I think how you turned that [10:02] around is fantastic. That's awesome. Um perhaps  another viewpoint um our philosophy is always [10:08] to start with the customer and the user journey  first and to truly understand the pain points, [10:14] the opportunities and the expectations of our  customers and associates. Um coming back to [10:20] magic apron that I mentioned previously there  was a really interesting and critical insight [10:24] that the team found on that journey which is  that if we look at our two large segments the [10:31] do-it-yourselfer and the pro they have very  different expectations of the magic apron [10:37] experience. The do-it-yourselfer um this uh  person typically wants to be inspired through [10:44] using magic apron. they want to browse the broad  product uh offerings that we have to offer. On [10:51] the other hand, um our pro customers, they are  looking typically for speed, for efficiency, [10:57] for effectiveness. They want to get extremely  precise answers even for very complex queries [11:04] and projects that they're working on. And so  uh really that understanding of picking up the [11:09] customer where they're at, what their expectations  is and then delivering that delightful experience [11:14] to them uh I see as absolutely critical for AI  adoption and success and going from prototype to [11:21] scale because there's a big difference between  someone like me who is renovating her bathroom [11:26] at home versus a builder who is we got we've  got deadlines. Exactly. That's why they have [11:34] separate lines right at the Exactly. separate  lines. I belong way over here. So, uh, ours is, [11:40] um, ours was more cultural and not so much, you  know, operational or infrastructure related, [11:45] but we basically had some really AI forward people  and then we had some people that were a little bit [11:51] more skeptical, definitely a little bit more  reserved. In our case, we had three levers [11:55] basically. Uh, one of them was kind of like seeing  it at the top. So, our CEO had never written a [12:01] line of code since this February. And then now  he's literally the highest token spender in the [12:07] entire company. Now, by the way, he'll tell you uh  there are engineers that are spending half of his [12:13] tokens but doing better work, but that's that's  something else. But what that does is when people [12:19] publicly invisibly see someone that's at that  level learn fail try they can't not right so that [12:29] was the number one thing number two thing is we  created this framework we call it the AI fluency [12:34] ladder it's five levels and we expect everyone in  the organization and there's a deadline too to be [12:39] at level two which is proficient it's like zero is  nothing right one is like an I don't know adopter [12:45] two is proficient, three is builder or something  like that. I can't remember all of them, but the [12:50] last one is multiplier. Um, but we expect everyone  to be at level two. And then the last thing is um [12:58] kind of show don't try to force. Our support team  I think did a great job with this. They actually [13:04] presented at company all hands a while back, but  they built this incredible agentic solution. Just [13:10] so you know, they used to have all these different  systems that they would go into when there's a [13:14] customer complaint. So you have Zenesk, you have  Jira, you have Confluence, Data Dog, I don't know, [13:18] Slack. There's just so much information  everywhere. They would go to all these sources. [13:23] They would gather all the information, try to keep  it in their brains, and then try to come up with [13:26] the solution or go to the right teams. Now there's  an agentic solution that does all of this for [13:31] them. And AI doesn't forget, right? It remembers  everything. So that's one thing already that's a [13:36] positive. 30 to 60 minute um ticket solving time  is now down to 5 to 10 minutes. And people that [13:44] know nothing about a particular problem can now  solve the problem because AI is helping them out. [13:49] So um I want to ask you this question first. We  can go through we hear a lot about text space LLMs [13:55] but multimodal AI incorporating image video voice.  Uh we know that is rapidly maturing. Is there any [14:03] emerging multi-modal use cases in your specific  industry that you believe will fundamentally [14:11] disrupt how you design products, markets or  serve customers? Absolutely. And honestly, [14:17] in our industry, it was never just about text.  We had software strings, you know, app strings, [14:22] we had video, audio, we had subtitling,  dubbing, transcription. All of that has to [14:27] go into all languages. But also just the amount  of content that's exploding right now. So, it's [14:32] not just about making it um you know, automating  those tasks, but it's doing it at scale. It's [14:37] incredible. Even if you just open up your LinkedIn  app now, it looks more like an Instagram, right? [14:42] There's video after video. And if you want to  try to, I don't know, just get all this content, [14:47] uh, subtitle it, dub it in different languages.  That's one challenge. The other challenge is the [14:53] ephemeral content versus the permanent content.  Like, if you're just talking about the FIFA World [14:57] Cup, that just comes and goes. So, you have all  this content. Do you really spend a lot of money, [15:01] time, effort to make that perfect versus your  landing page, your marketing materials? Um, [15:07] but yeah, Genai is making things so much easier  for us because it can ingest content and say, [15:12] well, in this image, we can actually, we were  talking with Raph last night about this. It's [15:16] it's pretty incredible the the stuff that that's  happening in our industry. But we can take audio, [15:22] we can take video, we can take images and we  can make them local or resonant in those markets [15:27] and we can do it at scale. Now, generative AI is  really helping us with that. How about you guys? [15:33] Yeah, home improvement inherently is multimodal  by nature. We have folks coming in with a light [15:39] bulb to be replaced um from the refrigerator for  example, uh photos that being sent to us from [15:46] the work site or blueprints as we talked about  earlier, especially for our pro uh segments. And [15:52] then of course also voice memos that we might be  getting. Uh here's the project they want to build. [15:57] Can you provide a quote for me for example? Uh  so inherently um he heavily multimodal perhaps a [16:03] concrete example where I've been leaning into this  space very recently is uh our AI voice agent that [16:11] we have rolled out. We have a lot of customers  calling to our stores directly uh for support. Um [16:17] and typically you would have encountered here um a  a tree a decision tree a phone tree. think about, [16:24] you know, press one for store hours. And that's  obviously a very frictionful uh experience. And [16:30] so we have been starting to replace this with a  voice agent that understands natural language, [16:37] that can understand intent in the matter of  seconds and can do everything from helping [16:42] answer questions to help you build a digital cart  to starting a service request uh and of course if [16:48] needed also seamlessly hand over uh to a store  associate as well. And this has been extremely [16:54] helpful both for our customers uh who can be  served much faster as well as of course for [17:00] our store associates who can really serve our  customers in the store and don't have to get [17:04] to the phone. That's so great because then you can  automatically say this is what I need. I need this [17:10] department instead of listening to one through  eight and then forgetting wait was that was it two [17:16] or three do I have to press? Yeah. Finally there  is someone working for you that that's exactly so [17:23] uh in our case well the multimodel is actually uh  the reality because we work with video text images [17:30] and audios like on a daily basis. So for example  in the data space with the videos we annotate [17:37] like hours of videos of uh different sports for  example annotating every single action happening [17:44] on the screen because that's the way you teach the  LLM uh uh to learn what's actually uh is happening [17:50] on a screen so to to to teach them how to watch  a video. So because they are not reliable today [17:56] then regarding images we fix the translations that  the AI generates and where they fail because they [18:03] don't understand the context of the image because  the text sometimes or most of the times is very [18:08] related to what's in the picture of the image.  Uh related to audios we label hours of audios [18:15] uh like recorded from body cameras. So full of  noises full of multiple people speaking at the [18:22] same time. So that's the real uh you know uh  audience that the AI should survive because [18:28] it's the reality of what's happening on a daily  basis. You know we don't actually speak one by [18:33] time we overlap sometimes because we are excited  we want to speak and regarding text we developed [18:39] an entire suite uh around the translation workflow  for like its mosaic code. So, Mosaic Editor, [18:45] our a power translation tool and mosaic, our AI  powered the linguistic quality assurance tool all [18:53] closing literally the translation workflow with  the help of agents because today I just want to [18:59] underline the fact that it's not what actually  the AI writes but it's actually what the AI [19:05] understands because the output quality comes  from the data set quality that you are feeding [19:10] the machine and that's where we step in doing it  in 150 language. which is basically could I add [19:16] to that actually because this is very important  I love the work that you guys are doing because [19:19] it's so important to train the AI to do the right  thing but we're talking about text that appears [19:23] in images there's also the image that is not  appropriate for c certain cultures we see this a [19:28] lot so like let's say you have a nice burger in an  image marketing image whatever and maybe there's [19:33] bacon coming out of it right maybe you don't want  to show that in the Middle East maybe you want [19:36] to change that to chicken or something like that  or beef maybe not appropriate for India you know [19:40] there there are certain cultural norms that AI can  now truly help as opposed to creating content from [19:46] scratch. And uh we're seeing it in all kinds of  industries too. And you made me think about this [19:52] um the multimodal. We had a customer for  example, imagine you got like a series and you [19:57] have seasons 1 through 4. They've already done  the subtitling and dubbing, right? This going [20:02] to be on TV now. There's season five coming out  and you have I don't know a a reel. What do you [20:07] call those? Uh recap reel, I guess, to remind  people what happened in season 1 through 4. [20:12] Now they have to go back because their marketing  team is asking for stuff that happened in those, [20:17] right? They have to find the clips. They have  to find the the text, you know, the subtitles [20:22] that goes with those clips. They have to put it  all together again. So they have to create this [20:26] 5 minute reel. It takes them days. And now these  agentic solutions can go into that repository, [20:32] find all this information and then stitch it  together. or even if they don't, they can tell [20:37] you where things are or they can extract the text  and then say this is the I don't know the five [20:42] minutes that you want. So you don't have to redo  the subtitling. You don't have to redo the dubbing [20:46] again. That is amazing. Um time to talk budgets  now [laughter] money. Um you know for leaders [20:55] uh trying to justify their AI budgets, how are  you measuring the success of these cuttingedge [21:03] applications? I mean what specific KPIs or  metrics are proving the most effective in [21:08] demonstrating you know breakthrough value to  your board or to your executive committee? I [21:15] want to hear from Fran because our size they're  so different. Happy to start. Um so in addition [21:22] to obviously the financial metrics and KPIs  that we're looking at, we're also considering [21:28] the reduction in friction for our customer  and associate experiences as well. This might [21:34] be number of hours reduced as we talked about  earlier for our pros when they might be using [21:40] um our blueprint takeoff capabilities. It might be  store associates that we talked about that don't [21:46] have to actually answer the phone but can tend to  the customers and do what they do best in terms of [21:51] serving our customers uh etc. So that's another  really important metric that we track and at the [21:59] scale of Home Depot size uh even small changes  in speed uh in resolution in accuracy can have [22:08] a meaningful impact across 2300 store locations in  North America as well as billions of interactions. [22:18] What has been, and we touched on this uh a little  bit earlier in our conversation about sort of, [22:23] you know, the rollouts. What has been the most  surprising or uned benefit that you've seen emerge [22:29] organically from your employees, your colleagues  using these tools on a day-to-day basis? I mean, [22:36] who did it win over? My chief people officer for  sure. I was in Hamburg visiting the office and [22:42] uh that's where she is. She literally just  said, "Hey, can we talk?" and and I got worried, [22:47] right? It's the chief HR officer. I'm like, am  I in trouble? But she was so excited about what [22:52] they built. She was genuinely excited because  she's never done this before. She hasn't worked [22:56] with AI. I mean, she's your typical HR person that  would just deal with all kinds of things that HR [23:02] people deal with, but it was never she was never  a builder. So, I think that was very surprising. [23:07] It was nice actually in a way. Um, by the way, I  want to say something about the budget thing too [23:11] because for us it was a little bit different. This  is um there are two things right internally it's [23:18] not so much about I mean AI is expensive let's  be honest here it's not free so you have to kind [23:23] of you know convince your board that you do have  to spend these things I'm sure you guys did that [23:27] Raph like when you're trying to build and convince  people to use it but also to build it it's one of [23:31] those things where we now said is is what we build  do they do they earn their keep so to speak like [23:38] are they actually working are they making us more  productive and that's proving that to the board on [23:42] external side on the client side we're no longer  talking about are we completing translation [23:47] projects are we translating x amount of words per  year or x amount of minutes being transcribed or [23:52] whatever but rather are we achieving what the  customer is trying to achieve is are we getting [23:57] the outcome that the translation is supposed  to produce in the first place and that is [24:02] not translation no one buys translation what they  really want is can I sell my product in Brazil can [24:07] I increase my product adoption in in Japan right  so those are now the KPI, so to speak. That's how [24:13] we justify the budget. If we can achieve that for  our customers, we can spend the money, but then [24:18] they also pay us for what we built. Internally,  if we build these tools, we're more productive. [24:23] The board has no problem with it. Raf, you're  I was going to say you're you're nodding your [24:27] head there. You say it's like a SQL 69 because in  order to get money, you need to give numbers. So, [24:32] you want numbers, but you need to give numbers.  So in our case actually we use like the we in [24:39] my case I want to say I use the three metrics  which is quality uh usability of the tools of [24:45] course and also like how uh impact how much impact  these like new solution that we create could have [24:54] within the company. So regarding the quality,  it's easy because well easy it's something that [24:59] you need to set up in advance with everybody  clients internal people like about what I'm [25:06] uh getting thanks to this tool thanks to this  solution back in terms of quality with the clients [25:11] for example that you know we do translations of  multiple books so quality nowadays with AI is no [25:18] more like a point of view is a pass or fail.  So like uh if they don't meet the threshold [25:24] just don't ship the book or whatever. And for  the internal team is exactly the same. So if [25:29] you don't meet my expectations in terms of which  numbers I'm getting back thanks to this solution, [25:34] you are not getting my money at all. So that's  the thing. And when I go to the CFO to say, [25:41] hey, I need budget for this solution or for this  like stuff. We don't say actually I promise that. [25:48] I just say these are the numbers per month, per  toll, per client. So now give me the budget that I [25:54] deserve. That's so again it's a I give you number  to get numbers back. So well and to follow up on [26:01] that I mean has that evolved over the past year?  I mean, is is the process of how you're going [26:09] about it evolved with the speed of of how AI is  changing things and you're having to come up with [26:15] a different strategy strategy, different numbers  even uh ways to kind of prove your point. I mean, [26:21] I don't know. No, please. I was going to say we  we completely changed our approach on how we make [26:28] uh how we charge things actually. So just to give  everybody an idea you could say well you need to [26:33] have this many machine translation units this many  AI units this many minutes for audio video content [26:39] you could have a platform fee we just say screw  all of that we don't want to stifle people talking [26:44] about multimodality right maybe you do a lot here  and you don't do much here why have all these [26:49] capacities so we switch to credit based pricing  but on top of that now it's more outcome based [26:55] too to give a real world example in our industry  you may have a transcriber that tells you, okay, [27:02] I charge $10 a minute. So, if it's a 10-minute  video, you know, it's uh wait, what did I say now? [27:10] Let's say it's a one hour video. $10 a minute,  that's $600, right? That's what you know, they're [27:15] going to charge you. But what if give you we give  you a tool and it used to take you four hours to [27:21] transcribe a 1 hour video. This tool allows you to  do it in an hour and 15 minutes. Should you really [27:26] still charge us $10 a minute for 60 minutes  of video? Because back then it took you four [27:31] hours. So technically the finances kind of worked  out. It's 150 bucks an hour. Now it doesn't make [27:37] sense anymore. So I think the entire industry is  shifting and I'm sure this is happening everywhere [27:41] as well. No, sorry. I mean I want to be really  brief because actually the the the solutions that [27:47] in our case we create internally change also the  perspective on the saleserson. or what they sell, [27:53] how they sell and actually also listening to the  problems around let's say the clients that might [27:58] have to to be faster in what they do because  now everything it's like I want this yesterday. [28:04] So and with the help of AI thanks I want to say  thanks you can get uh way uh very good solutions I [28:13] want to say to make sure that then your team your  people internally are able to sell them around and [28:20] simplify also their life because you are giving  a new product a new point of view to then sell to [28:26] to the to the clients together with of course  the powerfulness of the AI that can do almost [28:32] everything today. So I just want to be very brief  on this. So if you could give one piece of advice [28:40] to a peer in the audience that is just starting to  implement their first enterprisewide Gen AI case, [28:47] what would it be? Brian, we'll start with you.  Sure, happy to. I would say start obviously [28:54] with the business problem first, but more so I  would say start with the person who's going to [29:00] use the capability first. um often there is a  gap between the two and so I think it's really [29:07] important to deeply understand what are the  pain points what are the problems that we're [29:12] trying to solve whether it's for the customer or  the internal associate and solve their painoint [29:19] uh a lot of folks are asking how do I get better  adoption with AI I think if you are truly solving [29:25] a painoint a person has they will tear it out  of your hand and there is no adoption problem [29:33] And I want to say exactly the same because also  well actually today is very uh difficult to do uh [29:40] let's say to generate a solution you know you you  might end up generating a solution from scratch [29:46] without really focusing the attention on the real  problem that you have. So you end up building the [29:52] solution entirely and then at the moment of  the evaluation it doesn't reflect actually [29:57] the output you're expecting and you end up redoing  everything from scratch. So the evaluation of the [30:03] problem that you have internally is more important  than anything even before starting building the [30:09] solution itself. So once you do everything instead  of then you know stopping watching literally the [30:17] problems that you are getting you will be faster  and get exactly what you are achieving because you [30:22] did a an in-depth analysis on what you are trying  to achieve on this solution on the the output that [30:29] you want to get. So that's the suggestion start  with a problem and then you build the solution on [30:34] the problem itself. I'll add on to both of those  things. So yeah, I would say definitely do like [30:39] an EAP, an early adopter program, whether it's  internal or external, and be super transparent [30:46] about the failures, the bugs, the issues with it.  Uh for internal solutions, we'll literally have [30:51] people come in, you know, within the company, try  it out, and it could even be a customer product, [30:55] but like they try it out and they're very public  about the issues that they're having so that we [31:00] can fix it. Um same thing with the customer  solutions, too. Sometimes we'll pick some of [31:04] the most let's say um not just AI native but like  more forwardthinking customers maybe they're kind [31:11] of like they want they like to get their hands  on things that may not be quite ready but when [31:15] we were talking about completely headless when  you're talking about I don't know completely [31:19] agentic where you're not even doing anything  and where you're just literally chatting with [31:22] the system that's doing all kinds of things in  the background orchestrating everything for you [31:27] people like to try it and then they come back to  you with a thousand things that you should fix. [31:31] That's a good thing. But do that first. Do the  EAP internally or externally. And again, uh I [31:37] would say encourage people to be very vocal about  all the things that's wrong with it. You also like [31:42] to look ahead and and give folks something to  sort of outlook. Looking ahead in the next 12 [31:50] to 18 months, what is one gen AI application or  capability that you feel isn't quite ready yet, [31:58] but that you're eagerly waiting to deploy once  the technology catches up, which you know could be [32:04] next week. Happy to get started. I think spatial  AI is a challenging one um around measurement, [32:14] spatial dimensions, etc. Uh I think that is a  tricky problem to solve, a very important problem [32:20] to solve. And actually um funnily enough, I had  a brief small group conversation with Jeffrey [32:26] Hinton earlier today and he was asked exactly the  same question and he was giving an anecdote about [32:32] building a shed in his backyard and the LLM he  used also was struggling with this. He he also [32:38] had exactly the same point of view on that.  I think it's a very hard problem to solve. [32:44] Well, I'm really keen to see an AI  judge that is able to do the things [32:48] alone without me stepping in every single time  to understand if it's doing good or not. So, [32:55] because at the moment we have a lot of you know  AI workflows without humans in the loop that they [33:01] don't really work properly. We should always step  in and add a human checkpoint to understand the [33:07] quality to finetune to see the accuracy. But in  my opinion, we are still far from an agent able to [33:14] be a standalone judge where no human in the loop  is needed when actually is able to do everything [33:21] on its own because maybe the data sets are not  real there really there and not really clean or [33:30] not really prepared. So I think it takes time we  will be there but I'm really keen to see it. How [33:36] far you said it's going to be years really? Okay.  So, I'll challenge that. I'll say 12 to 18 months, [33:43] I think we're going to have agents operating  uh fully autonomously with as little uh with, [33:50] you know, basically almost no human input at all.  That's my prediction, but we'll see if it comes, [33:56] you know, true. I wish we can stay here  next year talking about those agents to see, [34:00] right? That's another use to present. And I don't  know, this might be a little too out there, maybe [34:07] a little too black mirrorish if you watch that  show on Netflix, but I think the way that we're [34:12] experiencing content might change. Meaning, if  I'm watching the same movie that you're watching [34:18] and maybe I want a little bit more violence, you  want a little less violence. That would definitely [34:22] be me and my wife. And um or maybe it's a, you  know, teenager watching it versus, you know, [34:27] the rated R movies or whatever. So, I think we're  getting to a point where there are a lot of tools [34:33] out there that understand the customer, they  understand the user. So, you go to a web page, [34:38] what you experience might be a little bit  different than what I experience. What you [34:41] see might be different than what I see. Um, and  I think that's going to all be in, you know, [34:46] my language, your language. We're both seeing the  same thing in Turkish, but you're seeing something [34:50] a little bit different because it's personalized  to you. We call that hyperpersonalization. I think [34:56] that's what we're going to see in the next 12 to  18 months as well because AI can really pick up on [35:00] this stuff and with the amount of automation that  we have, it's going to be easier for the content [35:06] producers to put out this kind of stuff out there  because otherwise, yeah, you you make one thing [35:10] and it's too too hard to adapt it from different  persons, you know, from person to person. [35:17] We are going to wrap things up a couple of  minutes early because we want to give all of you [35:22] um who would like to speak to our panelists a  few extra minutes before your next sessions to [35:27] come up to them off stage if you have any  questions, talk to them about something, [35:32] pitch something. Um we're going to wrap it up,  but please give a one final round of applause for [35:38] Raphael Fran and Semi. Thank you all so much for  joining us for this conversation today. Thank you.