Harman Pushes Zero-App AI System to Replace In-Car Mobile Interfaces

The Death of the App: Zero-App Interfaces & the Rise of AI-Orchestrated Mobility Experiences — Ai4

Ai4

Autonomous AI agency will eliminate traditional application menus across consumer hardware, forcing automakers and electronics brands to own cross-device orchestration or risk becoming commoditized endpoints.

AI-assisted summary of The Death of the App: Zero-App Interfaces & the Rise of AI-Orchestrated Mobility Experiences — original source. Check the original for full context.

Source published:

Detailed notes

## Background Published on YouTube by Ai4 on August 15, 2026, this keynote features Armin Prommersberger, Chief Technology Officer at HARMAN International. The session explores the shift from screen- and app-centric digital experiences toward "Zero-App" AI-orchestrated interfaces, examining the architectural, business model, and UX continuity challenges facing the automotive and consumer electronics industries.

## TL;DR Armin Prommersberger argues that modern conversational intelligence and autonomous agency are finally ending the app-centric era, shifting the paradigm from user micromanagement to proactive AI orchestration. Harman addresses this fragmentation across smart devices and vehicles through a four-layer architecture—encompassing account federation, orchestration AI, payload delivery, and IoT connectivity—governed by unified avatars like Luna. To succeed in real-world deployments, builders must conquer strict sub-500ms latency thresholds, optimize hybrid edge-cloud hardware costs, and maintain balanced cybersecurity guardrails. Ultimately, this zero-app approach enables frictionless, cross-domain continuity, turning environments like the connected vehicle into intelligent, context-aware nodes.

## Atmosphere & style The presentation carries a pragmatic, engineering-grounded keynote tone that cuts through generic AI hype with candid industry realism. Prommersberger delivers an authoritative and measured narrative, moving fluidly between high-level ecosystem shifts and tactical constraints like millisecond latencies and bill-of-materials costs. It feels like an insider masterclass for systems architects, instilling a sense of technical urgency while concluding with a confident, open invitation to collaborative innovation.

## Key takeaways - [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=4s) The traditional app-centric paradigm has trained users to micromanage dozens of apps, normalizing cross-app friction rather than delivering true convenience. - [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=4s) Harman leverages an end-to-end industry vantage point across professional studio production and massive consumer playback telemetry to track consumption shifts. - [04:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=282s) Unlike early virtual assistants, modern conversational intelligence possesses genuine natural language comprehension, setting the foundation for zero-app interfaces. - [04:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=282s) The rise of AI agency allows systems to predict needs and autonomously execute multi-step actions without demanding constant user permission. - [04:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=282s) Uncoordinated multi-device agency risks creating chaos, requiring a centralized AI orchestration front-end (such as Harman's Luna avatar) to govern device ecosystems. - [08:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=524s) Orchestration architectures must reconcile radically misaligned innovation lifecycles: 10-year vehicle platforms, 12-month consumer electronics, and weekly AI model updates. - [08:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=524s) Harman's orchestration framework relies on four modular tiers: Account Federation, Orchestration AI, deterministic MIMO Payload, and IoT connectivity. - [08:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=524s) Security guardrails must be carefully calibrated because over-constraining destroys autonomous agentic delight, while under-constraining creates severe vulnerability. - [13:59](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=839s) Interaction latency must strictly stay under 500 milliseconds for utterance-to-action responses, as exceeding this threshold causes immediate user distrust. - [13:59](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=839s) Achieving viable consumer device integration requires a fine-tuned hybrid edge-cloud model that aggressively minimizes hardware bill-of-materials and recurring token costs. - [13:59](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=839s) Cross-domain continuity enables seamless contextual handoffs, such as instantly resuming media and applying personalized acoustic profiles when moving from the home into a vehicle.

## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=4s) The Impending Death of the App-Centric Model

Armin Prommersberger, CTO of Harman (a Samsung company), opens his presentation by reflecting on the digital landscape. Having been in the industry for years, he notes that while the "death of the app" has been declared repeatedly over the past two decades without actually materializing, this time is fundamentally different. Harman occupies a unique vantage point across the entire content lifecycle: on one side, its professional audio equipment powers recording and production studios globally, offering early visibility into content creation trends. On the other side, Harman ships hundreds of millions of consumer playback devices annually—including headphones, Bluetooth speakers, and automotive infotainment systems—granting deep telemetry on user consumption behavior.

Prommersberger addresses how the industry collectively built an "app-centric" paradigm that trained users to become the micromanagers of their own digital lives. Modern smartphones typically carry 40 to 80 apps, while industry professionals often exceed 100. Yet despite this abundance, users regularly interact with only a tiny fraction of them daily. The industry normalized this cross-app friction and labeled it convenience. Now, singular modalities and isolated machines are failing to fulfill evolving consumer expectations, necessitating a shift toward **AI orchestration**—a paradigm that seamlessly connects surrounding devices by understanding context across user intent, devices, and the environment.

[04:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=282s) Intelligence and Agency: Why This Shift Is Different

Prommersberger outlines two major technological catalysts that distinguish the current moment from past failed promises of app-less interfaces. The first catalyst, which scaled roughly a year prior, is conversational intelligence: systems capable of understanding human language and parsing user intent. Unlike early 2010s virtual personal assistants (VPAs), which were merely basic intent classifiers bolted onto specific applications, today’s artificial intelligence possesses true linguistic comprehension, though it remains largely trapped behind glass screens.

The second catalyst—emerging only months before—is **agency**. Intelligent systems are no longer passive advisors asking for permission; they can now predict needs and execute multi-step actions autonomously without requiring continuous human approval. However, in an environment saturated with dozens of smart, eager-to-please, yet uncoordinated devices, unmanaged agency risks causing chaos rather than delight. Harman’s solution to this fragmentation is an AI orchestration front-end avatar known as Luna (part of Harman's *Ready Engage* product suite), which acts as the unified conversational interface governing the surrounding device ecosystem.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Evolution of Interface Paradigms A["App-Centric Model<br/>(User micromanages 40-80+ apps)"] --> B["Conversational Intelligence<br/>(Natural language intent parsing)"] B --> C["AI Agency<br/>(Predictive & autonomous execution)"] C --> D["AI Orchestration<br/>(Unified context & cross-device fabric)"] ```

[08:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=524s) Architecture and System Layers of AI Orchestration

To illustrate the necessity of AI orchestration, Prommersberger shares everyday examples where cross-device experiences ought to be fluid—such as transferring media seamlessly or adjusting ambient settings—yet fail due to ecosystem silos. He emphasizes that while the presentation highlights consumer electronics, the exact same architectural challenges exist in industrial production floors, hospitals, and connected vehicle fleets.

Building an architecture for AI orchestration requires bridging vastly different device lifecycles and hardware capabilities: automotive systems evolve on 10-year cycles, consumer electronics update every 12 months, and AI models iterate weekly. Harman approaches this complex environment through a structured four-layer system architecture:

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Four-Layer System Architecture for AI Orchestration L4["Account Federation Layer<br/>(User identity & external account bridging)"] L3["Orchestration AI Layer<br/>(User, device, usage & content graphs)"] L2["Payload Layer<br/>(Deterministic MIMO streaming & sync)"] L1["IoT Layer<br/>(Device discovery & control protocol)"]

L4 --- L3 L3 --- L2 L2 --- L1 ```

- **Account Federation Layer:** Manages user identity and integrates diverse third-party accounts across disparate ecosystems. - **Orchestration AI Layer:** Serves as the central intelligence node, evaluating user graphs, device graphs, usage telemetry, and content metadata while interfacing with external control systems like SmartThings or Matter. - **Payload Layer:** Handles deterministic multiple-input, multiple-output (MIMO) data and media distribution, ensuring synchronized playback with video and real-time system actions. - **IoT Layer:** Facilitates direct machine-to-machine communication and inter-device connectivity.

A major design mandate within this architecture is cybersecurity. Given the expanded attack surface resulting from rich cross-device and external cloud connections, guardrails must be carefully tuned. Over-constraining security destroys agency and "magic," whereas under-constraining it exposes the ecosystem to bad actors. Thus, trust and security are built in as baseline boundary conditions.

[13:59](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=839s) Key Learnings: Latency, Hybrid Processing, and Cross-Domain UX

Reflecting on Harman's deployment journey, Prommersberger highlights hard-won operational insights for builders and system architects:

1. **Multimodal Interaction & Latency Limits:** Interfaces are rapidly evolving beyond touch screens to voice and real-time biosignals (such as stress levels). However, latency remains the primary cause of user disengagement. If system response time—whether utterance-to-utterance or utterance-to-action—exceeds 500 milliseconds, users doubt whether the command was registered. Because a single request triggers hundreds of micro-tasks between edge devices and cloud endpoints, every 10-millisecond optimization is crucial. 2. **Hybrid Architecture & Bill-of-Materials (BOM) Optimization:** To satisfy strict latency requirements while keeping hardware costs viable, systems must balance edge computation with cloud offloading. Cost optimization down to the cent is required when integrating low-cost hardware (e.g., $100 headphones) into an orchestrated AI ecosystem without creating prohibitive token-usage expenses. 3. **Organizational Synergy:** Building these experiences requires bridging the gap between pure AI software companies (which lack deep consumer hardware and UX expertise) and consumer electronics firms (which lack core AI development capabilities). 4. **Cross-Domain Continuity:** The ultimate goal is seamless context transfer across domains. For example, when a user leaves their home audio setup and enters their vehicle (such as a Volvo equipped with a Bowers & Wilkins system), the vehicle greets them, offers to resume their audio session at the exact timestamp, and applies their custom acoustic profile automatically.

Prommersberger concludes by inviting industry partners, content creators, and technology vendors to collaborate with Harman via QR code to build out this unified zero-app ecosystem, finishing his presentation with over a minute to spare.

## Notable quotes > the vehicle cabin is becoming the most contested surface for AI-led experience orchestration — Armin Prommersberger

> The next interface is not a screen -- it’s intent, mediated by AI. — Armin Prommersberger

> When intent becomes the interface, distribution changes, data control changes, brand value changes, and “who owns the customer” gets rewritten. — Armin Prommersberger

## Mentioned Armin Prommersberger, HARMAN International, Samsung, Ai4, Luna, Ready Engage, SmartThings, Matter, Volvo, Bowers & Wilkins

## Video description Armin Prommersberger - Chief Technology Officer, HARMAN International

For twenty years digital experiences were built around a single assumption: users open an app, navigate menus, and adapt to product’s logic. That assumption is collapsing. The next interface is not a screen -- it’s intent, mediated by AI. We call this shift "Zero-App/AI-First Interfaces." In automotive, this shift is existential: the vehicle cabin is becoming the most contested surface for AI-led experience orchestration. This session examines what model is dying inside the vehicle -- and what must replace it to deliver trust, safety, and genuine delight. The opportunity is massive: the car can become the most context-rich node in a consumer’s daily ecosystem. The risk is just as large: if automotive doesn’t own the orchestration layer, it becomes a commodity endpoint in someone else’s AI universe. The session will examine the gaps between rhetoric and reality across orchestration AI, UX continuity, trust, and operating models. The “Zero-App” shift is not a UX trend... it’s a business model shift. When intent becomes the interface, distribution changes, data control changes, brand value changes, and “who owns the customer” gets rewritten.

[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0)

中文简报

哈曼力推“零应用”AI系统以取代车载移动界面 自主AI代理将消除消费级硬件中的传统应用菜单,迫使汽车制造商和电子品牌掌控跨设备编排能力,否则将面临沦为平庸终端的风险。 Armin Prommersberger 认为,现代对话智能和自主代理正在终结以应用为中心的时代,将交互范式从用户的微观管理转变为主动式 AI 编排。哈曼通过涵盖账户联合、编排 AI、有效负载交付和物联网连接的四层架构,来解决智能设备与车辆之间的碎片化问题,并由像 Luna 这样的统一人形智能体进行管理。为了在实际部署中取得成功,开发者必须攻克严格的 500 毫秒以下延迟门槛,优化端云混合硬件成本,并维持均衡的网络安全防护屏障。最终,这种“零应用”方式将实现无摩擦的跨域连续性,把网联汽车等环境转变为具备上下文感知能力的智能节点。 传统的以应用为中心的范式迫使用户去微观管理数十个应用,使得跨应用间的摩擦体验常态化,而非带来真正的便利。 (0:04) 哈曼利用贯穿专业工作室制作与庞大消费端播放遥测数据的端到端行业优势,持续追踪消费习惯的转变。 (0:04) 与早期的虚拟助手不同,现代对话智能拥有真正的自然语言理解能力,为“零应用”界面的实现奠定了基础。 (4:42) AI 代理能力的兴起使系统能够预判需求并自主执行多步骤操作,而无需反复索要用户许可。 (4:42) 缺乏协同的多设备代理操作容易引发混乱,因此需要一个集中式的 AI 编排前端(如哈曼的 Luna 虚拟形象)来管理设备生态系统。 (4:42)

Reading summary

Armin Prommersberger, CTO of Harman, argues that the digital landscape is transitioning from fragmented, app-centric interfaces to AI-orchestrated experiences driven by linguistic intelligence and autonomous agency. Catalysts Beyond the App-Centric Paradigm (0:04) Prommersberger contends that the traditional app-centric model has conditioned users to micromanage 40 to 80 mobile applications, despite only engaging with a small fraction on a daily basis. While previous claims of the demise of applications failed to materialize, he argues that two recent technological shifts make this transition viable. First, conversational intelligence reached scale by offering natural language intent comprehension, advancing beyond early 2010s virtual personal assistants that served as simple intent classifiers. Autonomous Agency and the Orchestration Layer (4:42) The second catalyst identified by Prommersberger is machine agency, which enables systems to predict needs and execute multi-step actions autonomously rather than acting as passive advisors. However, he warns that uncoordinated agency across numerous smart devices risks operational friction. Harman's proposed solution is an orchestration front-end avatar called Luna (part of the Ready Engage suite), designed to harmonize interactions across an ecosystem rather than leaving individual devices to operate in silos. Multi-Layer Architecture Across Diverging Hardware Lifecycles (8:44) Deploying cross-device orchestration requires bridging sharply mismatched development timelines: connected automotive platforms operate on 10-year lifecycles, consumer electronics refresh every 12 months, and AI models iterate weekly. Harman addresses these disparities through a four-layer architecture comprising an Account Federation Layer for identity, an Orchestration AI Layer governing contextual graphs and protocols like SmartThings or Matter, a Payload Layer managing deterministic multiple-input, multiple-output (MIMO) streaming, and an underlying IoT Layer for machine-to-machine connectivity. Prommersberger emphasizes that cybersecurity guardrails must be calibrated carefully within this stack. Because cross-device connections expand the attack surface, security settings that are too rigid eliminate system agency and user utility, while insufficient controls introduce serious vulnerabilities. Latency Constraints, Hybrid Compute, and Continuity (13:59) Harman's implementations demonstrate that latency remains the principal point of failure for multimodal interactions. Prommersberger observes that when total response time exceeds 500 milliseconds—whether between spoken utterances or from utterance to physical action—users question whether the system processed their command. Because an individual prompt triggers hundreds of micro-tasks across cloud endpoints and edge devices, engineering teams must optimize execution in 10-millisecond increments. To keep hardware commercially viable, systems rely on a hybrid architecture that balances edge computation against cloud processing. Prommersberger notes that bill-of-materials optimization must be managed down to the cent, ensuring lower-cost devices, such as $100 headphones, can participate in the ecosystem without incurring unsustainable token costs. The operational objective is cross-domain continuity, exemplified by a user transitioning from home audio to a vehicle that instantly resumes media playback at the correct timestamp and applies customized acoustic tuning. Prommersberger concludes that realizing an orchestrated, zero-app environment requires bridging the organizational gap between pure AI software vendors and consumer hardware manufacturers, urging cross-industry collaboration to establish shared interfaces and protocols.

精炼阅读摘要

哈曼(Harman)首席技术官Armin Prommersberger指出,以应用程序为中心的数字交互模式正走向终结,随着具备自然语言理解与自主行动能力的AI智能体兴起,未来的多设备交互将转向由“AI编排”(AI Orchestration)主导的无应用化体验。 应用程序模式的局限与协同转向 (0:04) Prommersberger表示,数字化产业过去数十年建立的“以应用为中心”架构,使用户被迫成为管理数十个甚至上百个孤立软件的微观协调者。现代智能手机普遍安装有40至80款应用程序,行业从业者设备中的应用数量更常超过100款,但用户日常实际高频调用的应用仅占极小比例,跨应用操作的割裂感长期被行业粉饰为使用便利。 哈曼依托其贯穿音频制作与消费全周期的产业地位观察到这一结构性瓶颈:在内容生产端,哈曼的专业音频设备部署于全球专业制作与录音棚,掌握内容创作的早期趋势;在消费端,哈曼每年交付数亿台涵盖耳机、蓝牙音响及车载信息娱乐系统的终端设备,拥有详实的用户消费遥测数据。Prommersberger认为,孤立设备与单一交互方式已难以满足用户预期,行业必须迈向能够结合用户意图、硬件环境与上下文背景进行跨设备协调的AI编排模式。 语言理解与自主代理的双重驱动 (4:42) Prommersberger分析指出,当前无应用界面之所以能摆脱以往多次预测落空的局面,主要得益于两项关键技术拐点的先后出现。第一项拐点是在约一年前实现规模化普及的对话智能,与2010年代初期仅作为特定应用外挂模块、基于简单意图分类的虚拟个人助手(VPA)不同,现代AI模型具备深度的自然语言理解能力,尽管目前大多数交互仍局限于屏幕之后。 第二项技术催化剂则是近几个月内涌现的“代理性”(Agency)。AI系统正从需要人类持续授权的被动建议者,转变为能够自主预测需求并执行多步骤任务的主动执行者。然而Prommersberger也提醒,若缺乏统一协调,充斥着大量各自执行任务的主动设备将导致交互失控。为此,哈曼展示了其Ready Engage产品套件中的AI编排虚拟形象Luna,作为统一的对话交互入口来协调周边的多硬件生态。 跨生命周期系统的四层分层架构 (8:44) 在跨设备体验落地中,系统架构面临不同技术迭代周期的严峻挑战:车载系统开发与适配周期长达10年,消费级电子硬件大约每12个月迭代一次,而底层AI模型以周为单位进行演进。Prommersberger指出,不仅消费电子领域存在应用孤岛,工业制造车间、医疗机构以及网联车队同样面临完全一致的架构整合难题。 针对上述痛点,哈曼构建了一套四层系统架构:最顶层为“账户联合层”,负责管理用户统一身份并打通第三方生态账户;第二层为“AI编排层”,作为核心决策枢纽,分析用户图谱、设备图谱、使用遥测及内容元数据,并对接Matter或SmartThings等外部控制标准;第三层为“载荷层”,处理确定性多输入多输出(MIMO)流媒体数据,保障音画同步与实时控制;最底层则是保障机器间通信的基础“物联网层”。Prommersberger特别强调,在扩大连接范围的同时必须精准划定网络安全边界,过度限制会破坏代理的自主性,限制不足则会引入安全风险。 毫秒级延迟控制与混合计算经济学 (13:59) 针对AI编排系统的工程部署,Prommersberger总结了四项核心实践经验。首先是多模态交互对延迟的极限容忍度:系统响应延迟(无论是语音对话交互还是语音触发动作)若超过500毫秒,用户便会怀疑指令是否被正确识别并产生脱落感;由于单次用户请求在边缘与云端之间会触发数百个微任务,工程团队必须对每个10毫秒的链路消耗进行优化。 其次是硬件成本与计算架构的平衡。为将单价低至100美元的耳机等入门级设备纳入编排生态,同时避免高昂的云端Token推演成本,架构必须在边缘计算与云端卸载之间实现细致到分厘级的物料清单(BOM)优化。此外,产业落地需要弥合AI软件公司缺乏硬件体验、消费电子厂商缺乏AI核心自研能力的组织鸿沟,以最终实现跨场景的上下文平滑交接——例如用户从家庭离开并坐进配备Bowers & Wilkins音响系统的沃尔沃汽车时,车机能自主打招呼、在精确的时间戳续播音频并无缝加载定制的声学参数。 Prommersberger在总结中呼吁产业链上下游的软硬件厂商、内容创作者与技术供应商展开协作,共同打破孤立应用的壁垒,建立兼顾实时性能、硬件成本与跨场景连贯性的AI编排生态。

Detailed notes — zh

## Background 本内容由 YouTube 频道 Ai4 于 2026 年 8 月 15 日发布,主讲人为哈曼国际(HARMAN International)首席技术官 Armin Prommersberger。视频围绕“App 之死”与 AI 编排移动体验展开,深入探讨了人机交互如何从传统的“以 App 为中心”转向“以用户意图为驱动”,以及汽车座舱如何成为 AI 体验编排的核心战场。 ## TL;DR Armin Prommersberger 指出,随着自然语言意图理解的大规模普及和 AI 自主代理能力的跃升,过去由独立 App 构筑的数字孤岛正被彻底打破。为了防止家庭与座舱内数十台智能设备争相迎合用户导致系统混乱,HARMAN 提出了涵盖控制、流媒体、账户与中枢大脑的四层织物架构(Fabric Architecture)。该方案通过端云混合架构极限压降 500 毫秒以内的交互延迟,并在严苛的网络安全边界与系统自主性能动性之间取得平衡,旨在跨越家居与车载域,提供真正的无缝连续数字生活体验。 ## Atmosphere & style 演讲节奏明快、幽默风趣且极具行业洞察力。Armin 站在横跨音频硬件与汽车座舱的产业老兵视角,没有生硬的产品推销,而是以老练务实的工程师态度直面“延迟梦魇”与“BOM 成本控制”等底层阵痛,整场分享在冷静剖析技术架构挑战与描绘人机交互“魔法时刻”之间保持了张力,专业且振奋人心。 ## Key takeaways - [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=4s) HARMAN 依托贯穿专业内容创作与海量终端消费的“双向数据融合”优势,敏锐捕捉到人机交互范式正在发生结构性裂变。 - [01:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=94s) 过去二十年“以 App 为中心”的模式将用户规训为数字生活的微观管理者,科技行业在本质上将应用间的割裂摩擦常态化并美化成了“便利”。 - [04:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=243s) 本次“App 之死”的质变拐点在于两项底层技术的叠加:规模化的人类级自然语言意图解析(Intent Parsing)与无需人类在环的端到端自主代理能力(Agency)。 - [06:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=368s) 未来空间中数十台高度智能且渴望讨好用户的孤立设备,若缺乏统筹协调将引发彻底的混乱,AI 编排器(如虚拟化身 Luna)的核心使命即在于平抑单点智能带来的体验过载。 - [08:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=524s) AI 编排具备跨领域的通用性,不仅能解决智能家居与车机的场景割裂,还能无缝迁移至工业车间、智慧医院及车队调度等需要多节点协同的高复杂度场景。 - [10:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=604s) 为缝合汽车(10年)、消费电子(12个月)与 AI(数周)之间巨大的时间尺度落差,HARMAN 提出了模块化的四层解耦织物架构(Fabric Architecture)。 - [10:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=604s) 编排 AI 中枢通过协同解析用户、设备、使用行为与内容四大图谱,并深度兼容 SmartThings 和 Matter 等现有生态标准,实现对物理环境与影音流的综合调度。 - [12:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=765s) 全互联架构呈指数级放大了系统的网络攻击面,系统必须在防护边界(Guardrails)与保留体验“能动性(Agency)”之间精准权衡,将信任与安全作为绝对边界条件。 - [13:59](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=839s) 多模态交互对延迟极度敏感,超过 500 毫秒便会导致用户脱离交互,研发团队必须依赖严苛的端云混合架构将硬件 BOM 成本与云端 Token 消耗精细控制到分厘之间。 - [16:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=961s) 体验编排的终极价值在于打破场景孤岛以实现跨域连续体验(如家庭音响向车机座舱的无缝流转),这需要原生 AI 能力与传统硬件 UX 基因展开跨产业深度协同。 ## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=4s) HARMAN 的独特双向视角与“App 之死”的重提 演讲开场,HARMAN 首席技术官(CTO)Armin Prommersberger 介绍了自己的背景与公司定位。作为三星电子(Samsung)旗下的独立子公司,HARMAN 拥有洞察消费者行为演变极其独特的“双向信号”优势。Armin 幽默地指出,在座许多深耕行业多年的老兵一定和他一样,已经经历过大概十次所谓的“App 正在走向死亡”的论调,但每一次 App 都未曾真正消失。然而这一次,他明确表示“情况真的不同了”,并承诺今天上午不是来推销任何产品的,而是希望展开一场关于未来的深度对话,分享 HARMAN 已经得出的结论与实践经验。 HARMAN 之所以能够看清这一行业转向,核心在于其业务横跨内容生态的两端: - **内容创作端**:HARMAN 为全球各地的专业录音棚和影视制作工作室提供顶级设备与技术解决方案,这让团队能够极早捕捉到内容创作趋势与技术演进的风向标。 - **内容重现与消费端**:HARMAN 每年在全球销售数以亿计的音频与终端设备,涵盖耳机、蓝牙音箱以及汽车座舱智能座舱信息娱乐系统(IVI)。 通过将内容生产的源头信号与海量消费者使用终端设备的真实行为信号进行深度融合(Data Fusion),HARMAN 能够极其敏锐地发现人机交互范式的结构性裂变。 ### [01:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=94s) “以 App 为中心”的困境:被常态化的摩擦与数字生活的微观管理者 Armin 直言,整个科技行业在过去二十年中共同构建并固化了一种模式——“以 App 为中心”(App-centricity)。行业实际上是将用户训练成了一个个对其数字生活进行微观管理的“工头”。在智能手机上,普通用户平均安装了 40 到 80 款 App,而在科技峰会现场的专业人士手机里,这个数字轻松突破 100 款。 然而现实是极为讽刺的:在这一百多个 App 中,用户每天频繁打开的不过寥寥数款,一个月内甚至用不到其中一半;更糟糕的是,App 之间构筑了深厚的壁垒。虽然单个 App 自身的体验可能非常精致,但一旦尝试让两款 App 协同工作来完成一个连续任务,就会充斥着割裂与摩擦。科技行业实际上是“将这种摩擦常态化,并硬生生将其美化成了所谓的‘便利’(normalized friction and called it convenience)”。 当前消费者的真实需求正在发生剧烈变化: - **单一交互模态失效**:基于触屏和独立 App 的单向度模式已无法满足当下用户的使用期望。 - **孤立设备无能为力**:单点、割裂的硬件设备再也无法承载连续的数字生活体验。 - **亟需 AI 编排(AI Orchestration)**:行业必须从底层重新审视系统架构(Architecture)与数据流通织物(Fabric),打破硬件孤岛,让 AI、上下文信息与内容在多个物理设备之间无缝流转。 ### [04:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=243s) 为什么这次“App 之死”与众不同:从意图理解到自主代理 为什么这一次“App 真的要走向终结”?Armin 指出,过去 App 多次在自己的“葬礼”上成功复活,但过去一年左右,底层技术发生了两项决定性的跃迁,彻底打破了旧规则: ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: AI-driven transition from App-centricity to Agentic Orchestration subgraph Legacy["传统模式与早期探索"] A["App 中心化架构<br/>(40-80+ 孤立 App)"] --> B["2014-2015 早期虚拟助手 (VPA)<br/>本质为硬编码意图分类器"] end subgraph Modern["当下的双重跃迁"] C["跃迁一:自然语言意图解析<br/>(如人类般理解深层 Intent)"] D["跃迁二:代理能力 (Agency)<br/>(无需人类在环即可预测与行动)"] end subgraph Outcome["最终范式演进"] E["AI 编排架构 (AI Orchestration)<br/>打破屏幕玻璃限制,统合全场景设备"] end Legacy --> Modern C --> E D --> E ``` 1. **规模化具备人类水准的意图解析能力(Intent Parsing)**: 大约一年前,高智商系统开始在大众层面普及。回顾 2014 至 2015 年语音助手(VPA)兴起时,那些系统本质上只是“生硬嫁接在应用上的意图分类器(intent classifiers bolted onto applications)”,毫无真正的智能可言。而如今,大模型系统终于能够真正使用人类自然语言与用户对话并准确解析复杂意图,尽管它目前在很大程度上仍被“困在玻璃屏幕之后”。 2. **具备主动执行的自主性(Agency)**: 这是近几个月才呈现在公众视野中的关键突破——智能系统获得了行动与执行力(Agency)。它们不再仅仅停留在被动响应或弱弱地给出建议(如“我建议您采取这项操作”),而是能够在没有用户逐步介入控制(human-in-the-loop)的情况下,自主预测需求并直接代表用户完成任务。 这种“能像人类一样顺畅对话”加上“具备端到端落地行动力”的双重能力叠加,构成了改写人机交互历史的拐点。 ### [06:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=368s) 20 台设备都在争相讨好:混乱危机与 Luna 形象背后的编排 AI Armin 让现场观众设想未来一年内的真实生活场景:用户可能不会看到实体机器人在家里走动,但必定会被 10 台、20 台甚至 30 台高度智能化的联网硬件设备所包围。 现阶段接触过前沿 AI 的人都知道,这些系统有一个普遍特征——“极度渴望讨好人类(very eager to please)”,它们时刻想提供帮助、时刻在向用户确认反馈。如果在客厅里有 20 台各自独立的智能设备,每台设备都具备强烈的意愿想帮你、讨好你,却彼此孤立无法协同,那带来的绝非美妙体验,而是一场“彻底的混乱(potential chaos)”。 这正是 **AI 编排(AI Orchestration)** 登场的时刻。屏幕中央展示的虚拟形象并不是为了这次会议凭空捏造的吉祥物,而是 HARMAN 真实的编排 AI 前端交互化身——**Luna**(属于 HARMAN 汽车座舱解决方案 Ready Engage 的一部分,本质是运行在骨骼绑定上的交互皮肤)。AI 编排的核心职责就是统筹全局,平抑单点智能过度表达带来的干扰,让多设备协同发声。 Armin 强调,HARMAN 的用户并非生活在数字《黑客帝国》(The Matrix)里,而是生活在真实的物理世界与空间中: - 从早到晚,HARMAN 通过耳机、便携音箱、家用音响以及汽车中控与用户高频互动; - 加上母公司三星(Samsung)的智能手机、电视及各种智能家电,其生态渗透在家庭的每一个角落。 这种深入物理日常的广度,使得 HARMAN 拥有极具价值的宏观视角,能够看清用户对硬件的依赖是如何随时间发生渐变与阶梯式跳跃的。 ### [08:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=524s) 场景畅想与跨界通用性:消解智能过载,预判用户所求 在理想的无缝体验中,系统应能自动理解用户的身份意图、心智愿望(aspiration)、设备当前所处环境以及播放的内容,并在背景中自动完成决策,带来真正充满惊喜的“魔法时刻(magical experience)”。然而如果客观审视当前智能家居与车机现状,绝大多数场景依然充满了割裂与失灵。 AI 编排器的使命是双重的: - **降低智能过载**:压制多台设备争相讨好用户的多余噪音与认知负担; - **主动预判需求**:基于跨设备环境与情境上下文,主动编排下一步服务,提供无摩擦的连续体验。 Armin 进一步提醒在座的基础设施与工具链开发者:虽然当前演示以消费电子为主,但该逻辑具有完全的通用性。只要把家庭环境替换为**工业生产车间、智慧医院或大型车队调度**,面临的痛点完全一致——都是在一个复杂的物理空间中,面对数十乃至上百个孤立的智能节点,必须依靠编排层才能释放整体生产力。 ### [10:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=604s) 应对多重时间尺度的四层织物架构设计 构建此类编排系统最大的挑战在于不同产业之间剧烈的“时间尺度落差(clash of cycles)”: - **汽车工业**:产品研发与生命周期通常以 **10 年** 为周期演进; - **消费电子**:迭代周期约为 **12 个月**; - **AI 领域**:技术范式与模型能力每隔 **数周** 就会彻底刷新。 要将这三种速度截然不同的世界缝合在一起,HARMAN 提出了一套模块化的四层解耦架构体系: ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: HARMAN Four-Layer Fabric Architecture subgraph Top["顶层:身份与互联"] AF["账户联邦层 (Account Federation Layer)<br/>(统一用户核心数字身份,汇聚外部多账户)"] end subgraph Core["核心枢纽:编排智能体"] ORCH["编排 AI (Orchestration AI)<br/>(协同分析四大图谱:用户图谱 / 设备图谱 / 使用图谱 / 内容图谱)"] end subgraph Base["底层通信与传输织物"] direction LR IOT["IoT 控制层<br/>(设备握手、语义互联通信)"] PAYLOAD["Payload 有效负载层<br/>(MIMO 音视频低延迟多入多出流媒体分配与强时钟同步)"] end subgraph Physical["终端与外部生态"] DEV["异构物理设备 (汽车/耳机/音箱/大屏)<br/>(算力参差不齐,共存传统控制 App)"] EXT["外部生态接口<br/>(SmartThings、Matter、外部 AI 服务、三方内容源)"] end AF --> ORCH ORCH --> IOT ORCH --> PAYLOAD IOT --> DEV PAYLOAD --> DEV ORCH -.-> EXT DEV -.-> EXT ``` 1. **IoT 控制层与 Payload 有效负载层(底层基座)**: 底层物理设备极其异构,有些设备(如车机大屏)拥有强大的算力芯片,而有些(如小型传感器或耳机)计算能力极为孱弱。 - **IoT 层**负责打通设备间的通信协议,确保彼此发现与理解; - **Payload 层**负责承载重型内容(音频、视频流等)。该层被设计为一个严格确定性(deterministic)的 MIMO(多输入多输出)结构,确保在复杂环境中影音流能跨屏、跨端保持极低延迟的高精度时钟同步。 2. **账户联邦层(Account Federation Layer,顶层接入)**: 现实中用户绝不会只守着一个孤立账号,每个人都拥有多个跨平台的数字账号。该层旨在将外部碎片化的多账户体系联邦化,统一挂载在唯一的用户数字身份之下。 3. **编排 AI 枢纽(Orchestration AI,中枢大脑)**: 中枢 AI 居中统领并实时调用四大图谱:**用户图谱(User Graph)**、**设备图谱(Device Graph)**、**使用行为图谱(Usage Graph)** 与 **内容图谱(Content Graph)**。 4. **开放互联与标准兼容**: Armin 强调,HARMAN 绝非要闭门造车构建一个封闭的花园,更不是要取代现有的智能家居标准。该架构全面拥抱并协同 SmartThings、Matter 以及各类行业控制系统。因为要想提供极致的用户体验,AI 编排系统不仅要接管声音与画面的分发,更需要有能力实时调控整个物理房间的光照、温控与场景环境。 ### [12:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=765s) 安全边界与系统能动性的平衡困境 在构建跨设备、跨场景的体验编排系统时,系统需要能够灵活调动灯光,或是车内的暖通空调(HVAC)系统,从而实时营造出契合用户当前需求的真实环境。然而,面对极其庞大且互联的系统拓扑,网络安全从业者看到这一架构图的第一反应往往是“天哪,这简直难以置信”。如此多的组件互联以及跨系统边缘通信,导致系统的攻击面(attack surface)呈指数级扩大,防御边界的难度前所未有。 研发团队陷入了两难权衡:如果设立过于严密和僵化的防护边界(guardrails),系统就会彻底失去能动性(agency),其所带来的无缝“魔法感”与智能体验也将荡然无存;但如果放任不管或约束过松,系统就极易越界(overstep),向恶意攻击者敞开大门。因此,团队确立了一条关键的设计准则:“信任与安全是必须满足的边界条件,而绝非可有可无的选项。” ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 安全边界与系统能动性的权衡 subgraph Dilemma["设计权衡 (Design Trade-off)"] direction TB Tight["防护边界过紧 (Too Tight)"] --> Lose["丧失系统能动性,失去体验魔法"] Loose["防护边界过松 (Too Loose)"] --> Risk["系统越界,暴露庞大攻击面"] end Dilemma --> CorePrinciple["核心准则:信任与安全是绝对的边界条件 (Boundary Condition)"] ``` --- ### [13:59](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=839s) 延迟梦魇、生物信号与严苛的端云混合架构 对于未来的交互形态,传统的“以应用为中心”(App-centric)的时代正在走向终结,取而代之的是多模态交互。虽然独立 App 不会在一夜之间完全消失,但语音交互与生物信号(bio-signals)的深度融合正成为核心驱动力。实时监测用户的压力水平或放松状态具有双重价值:一方面能即时动态调整座舱体验;另一方面能作为闭环指标,实时检验编排 AI(Orchestration AI)决策的有效性。然而,构筑这种系统最令人头疼的核心痛点是延迟——“真正让我彻夜难眠的就是延迟(latency)”。 一旦延迟超过 500 毫秒,用户就会迅速产生挫败感并脱离交互状态。无论这 500 毫秒是发生在“两句对话之间”(机器迟迟未能应答),还是发生在“发出语音到触发动作之间”(例如用户说“在客厅播放某首歌”,系统却在数秒内毫无反应,让用户陷入“到底成功了没有、是不是坏了”的疑虑)。在单个微任务的执行链路背后,其实有数百个任务在边缘设备与多个云端组件之间频繁往返,因此研发团队必须对每 10 毫秒的延迟进行极致抠抠。 为了在极致成本和物理限制下解决这一难题,团队采用了一种高强度的端云混合架构(hybrid system architecture): - **边缘算力与物料清单(BOM)控制**:消费电子产品对物料清单成本极为敏感,硬件必须在精确到“分”(down to the cent)的成本约束下尽可能强化边缘算力。 - **Token 消耗优化**:如果售价仅 100 美元的耳机接入了整个智能生态系统,每次交互都在云端产生可观的 Token 账单,高昂的模型调用成本将具有毁灭性,因此 Token 消耗同样必须抠到分厘。 --- ### [16:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=961s) 编排 AI 驱动跨域体验与生态合作倡议 当前技术周期迎来了过去二十年间消费电子与汽车行业中最令人振奋的技术节点,那就是体验编排 AI。从现有的技术雏形来看,这一愿景落地的确定性极高,但除了技术挑战之外,企业所面临的更大阻碍来自组织基因层面的认知隔阂。纯粹的 AI 公司本质上并不具备理解消费终端和打磨人机体验(UX)的深层基因;反过来,传统消费电子企业在核心能力上也并非原生 AI 公司。然而构建一个合格的未来系统,这两类认知与专业能力缺一不可。 这一演进的终极价值在于实现真正的“跨域连续体验”(cross-domain experience)。例如,当你在家中通过 Bowers & Wilkins 音响听音乐时暂停并离开,坐进搭载该音响系统的沃尔沃(Volvo)汽车时,系统会自动向你问好并提示:“需要接着播放刚才中断的曲目吗?另外,要不要顺便把你在家中最喜欢的音频调音设置也同步迁移到车内?”这种无缝流转的体验一旦亲身感受过,就会展现出极大的吸引力。 - **产业合作号召**:这是一场极其庞大的技术旅程,单打独斗绝无胜算。Armin 向全场呼吁,无论是拥有垂直解决方案、底层技术还是优质内容,亦或是希望共同参与构建这套下一代移动体验系统的伙伴,都可以扫描大屏幕上的二维码建立联系,共同开启这场对话。演讲最后,他幽默地调侃自己比预期时间还节省了 1 分 16 秒,称赞现场控场节奏“非常严谨”,并在掌声中结束了分享。 ## Notable quotes > [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=4s) App 正在走向死亡 — Armin Prommersberger > [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=4s) 今天上午不是来推销任何产品的,而是希望展开一场关于未来的深度对话 — Armin Prommersberger > [01:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=94s) normalized friction and called it convenience — Armin Prommersberger > [04:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=243s) 生硬嫁接在应用上的意图分类器 — Armin Prommersberger > [06:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=368s) 极度渴望讨好人类 — Armin Prommersberger > [06:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=368s) 彻底的混乱 — Armin Prommersberger > [12:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=765s) 信任与安全是必须满足的边界条件,而绝非可有可无的选项 — Armin Prommersberger > [13:59](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=839s) 真正让我彻夜难眠的就是延迟 — Armin Prommersberger > [16:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0&t=961s) 需要接着播放刚才中断的曲目吗?另外,要不要顺便把你在家中最喜欢的音频调音设置也同步迁移到车内? — Armin Prommersberger ## Mentioned Armin Prommersberger, HARMAN International, Samsung, Luna, Ready Engage, SmartThings, Matter, Bowers & Wilkins, Volvo ## Video description Armin Prommersberger - Chief Technology Officer, HARMAN International For twenty years digital experiences were built around a single assumption: users open an app, navigate menus, and adapt to product’s logic. That assumption is collapsing. The next interface is not a screen -- it’s intent, mediated by AI. We call this shift "Zero-App/AI-First Interfaces." In automotive, this shift is existential: the vehicle cabin is becoming the most contested surface for AI-led experience orchestration. This session examines what model is dying inside the vehicle -- and what must replace it to deliver trust, safety, and genuine delight. The opportunity is massive: the car can become the most context-rich node in a consumer’s daily ecosystem. The risk is just as large: if automotive doesn’t own the orchestration layer, it becomes a commodity endpoint in someone else’s AI universe. The session will examine the gaps between rhetoric and reality across orchestration AI, UX continuity, trust, and operating models. The “Zero-App” shift is not a UX trend... it’s a business model shift. When intent becomes the interface, distribution changes, data control changes, brand value changes, and “who owns the customer” gets rewritten. [Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0_CQUnkNH0)

Source quotes

[0:04] Armin Prommersberger: App 正在走向死亡 [0:04] Armin Prommersberger: 今天上午不是来推销任何产品的,而是希望展开一场关于未来的深度对话 [1:34] Armin Prommersberger: normalized friction and called it convenience [4:03] Armin Prommersberger: 生硬嫁接在应用上的意图分类器 [6:08] Armin Prommersberger: 极度渴望讨好人类 [6:08] Armin Prommersberger: 彻底的混乱 [12:45] Armin Prommersberger: 信任与安全是必须满足的边界条件,而绝非可有可无的选项 [13:59] Armin Prommersberger: 真正让我彻夜难眠的就是延迟 [16:01] Armin Prommersberger: 需要接着播放刚才中断的曲目吗?另外,要不要顺便把你在家中最喜欢的音频调音设置也同步迁移到车内?

Source quotes

Armin Prommersberger: the vehicle cabin is becoming the most contested surface for AI-led experience orchestration Armin Prommersberger: The next interface is not a screen -- it’s intent, mediated by AI. Armin Prommersberger: When intent becomes the interface, distribution changes, data control changes, brand value changes, and “who owns the customer” gets rewritten.

Original transcript

[0:04] So my name is Armen Promisberger, CTO of Harmon.  Harmon is actually a Samsung company and division [0:10] and we have a quite interesting perspective on the  market, how consumer behavior changes and we're [0:15] going to talk about that. So a few of you most  probably have been around just like me for a few [0:21] years and we have seen the moment where the app  is dying like 10 times over and then it didn't, [0:26] right? So let's talk about in the next 20 minutes  why we think this time is different, how we come [0:35] to the conclusion, what does it mean and what  did we learn already that you might take away [0:40] that can help you. The good news is I'm not  here to sell you anything in the morning. [0:45] So it's more about starting a really good  conversation of what is coming in the future. [0:51] Why does Harmon have this unique perspective and  that's very straightforward. We are on both sides [0:57] of the content. On the one side, we we create  products and solutions that are used to create [1:04] content in recording studios, production  studios around the world. That gives you [1:10] gives us an early insight in what the trends  are, what is happening in content creation. [1:17] On the other side, we are selling hundreds  of millions of devices every year for [1:22] content reproduction. headphones, Bluetooth  speakers, infotainment systems in your cars [1:28] and that gives us an insights how people are using  it and now we can fuse both of these signals. [1:34] One thing that we as an industry all of us now we  are guilty right um that we induced into the users [1:42] lives is actually this idea of abentricity. The  appentric model is something we all created more [1:50] or less 20 years ago. So there's an app for  everything, but when you're using your apps, [1:55] how intuitive is it? Some of them are really  good, but have you ever tried to make two apps [2:00] work together nicely to create something  together? That might create some friction. [2:07] What we see in the market is that user  expectations are very much changing. What we see [2:13] in the market is that a singular modality like the  absentric model will no longer feed these desires. [2:21] What we also see in the market is that individual  isolated machines devices are no longer feeding [2:30] the desire of the user. So this is the moment  when we as a group need to start about something [2:35] that we call actually AI orchestration.  The black bar is actually hiding that [2:42] So AI orchestration is really for us the moment  when we talk to all of those devices around the [2:49] users and create a unique experience understanding  context of the user the devices the environment [2:59] that will lead us to a conversation today  about architecture and there's something [3:05] about architecture and fabric right that's why  in our lingo we talk we call it architecture [3:11] because we need to think about how we architect  a full system that is talking to all of those [3:16] devices and then how we create a fabric that  is eventually allowing the AI, the information [3:23] and the content to move around as intended.  Let's start with the appentric part, right? [3:31] What we really did is we trained our users to  be the micromanagers of their digital lives, [3:39] right? We have all of these wonderful smartphones  and on average there are 40 to 80 apps on every [3:47] smartphone. I guess in this room with our  profession we are way beyond the 100 right. So [3:56] we simply normalized friction the friction that  we just talked before and called it convenience. [4:03] I really believe that AI is  here to rip this idea apart. [4:09] What is really happening is that out of these  100 apps, you're using a handful every day, [4:15] maybe not even half of it every month. So, what  is the point? Right? The app per se has been [4:23] remarkably hard to kill, right? It survived its  own um funeral quite a few times. But why is it [4:33] different now? Why do we believe? What do we see  in our usage data that this is a different moment? [4:42] The first thing that arrived about a year ago at  scale right for the broad public is the arrival [4:50] of very intelligent systems that can converse with  the user in human language parsing their intent. [5:00] We all remember the 2014s 15s with the advent of  the what we called back at the time VPAs but they [5:07] were not really very intelligent. They were pretty  much I would say intent classifiers bolded onto [5:13] applications. Now intelligence finally arrived  but it's still kind of trapped behind glass. [5:23] The second thing that is very different and  that is only month old in the public view right [5:29] is these intelligence systems now became or  they gained agency. They can do things now. They [5:36] can act and they can act and predict without  you even being in the loop without you being [5:43] oh I recommend you take this action and this  is what you need to do. So this is why we think [5:49] it's very different right now that we have two  moments that create a unique moment in time. [5:59] The intelligence system can converse with  you like a human being and it is able to act. [6:08] So what does this mean and why should this  be interesting to our users, our consumers? [6:14] Consider a situation like this in a year from  now. You most probably won't see any robots [6:18] sitting around. However, you will be surrounded  by 10, 20, 30 pretty intelligent devices. [6:27] Now, we all dealt with all these beautiful AI  systems, right? And we're doing it all the time. [6:33] And one thing we learn is like they are very  eager to please, right? They really want to [6:38] please you. They want to help you. They want to  get reconfirmation. Now think about a situation [6:43] when you are in your living room. You have  20 devices. They are not working together. [6:47] They are all monolithic and all 20 want to help  you and and want to please you. That doesn't sound [6:52] like delight. It sounds pretty much like potential  chaos, right? This is the moment when we believe [6:58] actually that AI orchestration is entering the  room. And what you see right there in the middle, [7:08] Luna, is actually not a fancy character we  created for AI4. If you're interested in what she [7:14] really is, search the web for Ready Engage Harmon  International. She actually is, what you see here [7:22] is a front-end avatar of our orchestration  AI system, and she is a skin on a rig. [7:31] The moment we can orchestrate  all those devices around us [7:38] is the moment when magic happens. Now why would  the user be interested and not just the tech nerds [7:45] and the engineers and maybe some product managers  and marketing people? Because this is the reality [7:50] for example of us as a company. What you see  here is a representation, an insight in how [7:57] our product portfolio looks like and the world  of our users. We are not living in the matrix. [8:02] We are still living in a very physical world. We  are dealing with physical devices in real spaces. [8:10] We touch the lives of our users throughout the  day multiple times with headphones, Bluetooth [8:15] speakers, speakers at home, infotainment systems  in your cars. And then if you put our mothership [8:20] into the mix right with Samsung then there are  mobile phones, TVs, intelligent um appliances, all [8:27] of that. We are much more than just a device in  the corner. We are literally part of the family. [8:33] And this is the power of the insights that  we have. How the devices, how people are [8:37] using the devices, what is changing over  time as a step function or gradually. [8:44] This now is a representation of how this could  look like. We selected a few very simple use [8:50] cases. If you read quickly through those  use cases, you will start nodding and say, [8:55] "Yeah, this is how it should be." Then please  think for a second, how often does this work [9:00] seamlessly and frictionfree in your home, in your  environment today? Most probably it does not, [9:07] right? The orchestrations AI's job is not only  to reduce the overload of the intelligence and [9:14] the eagerness to please. It's actually there to  anticipate your needs, understand for example [9:20] your intention, your aspiration, the context of  the devices, your environment and your content [9:26] and then make decisions of what you might  be liking next as a magical experience. [9:33] One thing for all of us because I think  we have as many builders as people who [9:37] actually are responsible for infrastructure  and tool chains and workflows. [9:42] This looks very consumer electronics focused.  You can replace this picture simply with [9:49] a production floor, a hospital, a car fleet  and you still run into the exact same problem. [9:56] You have a lot of intelligent devices that you  need to orchestrate to make sense of for the user. [10:04] So now let's talk about what we need to  architect. So how are we dealing with [10:07] this? What is the architecture? What is  the fabric that we are applying? Right? [10:13] We need to consider one thing. The systems  that we are building are continuously moving. [10:20] AI is moving incredibly fast. If you're in  automotive, your world moves in 10 years. [10:26] If you are in consumer electronics, your world  moves in 12 months. If you're dealing with AI, [10:32] your world moves like in weeks. So now we need to  bring all of that together. The way how we think [10:38] about it at Hormon is very simple. The foundation  to us is physical devices and control apps. They [10:42] are still there at this point in time. As you can  see, these devices are all very different. Some [10:48] have massive computational power. Some don't. They  all need to now engage with the same ecosystem. [10:55] So, what we are thinking of is a system of four  layers. The first two layers are IoT and payload, [11:01] which is really what the devices are directly  talking to because IoT is obviously required so [11:07] the devices can talk to each other, understand  each other, and communicate. And then payload [11:11] for us is where the content comes in and is  distributed across all of your environments, [11:15] all of your devices which is to us a myo which  is a multiple inputs, multiple output structure, [11:21] right? It must be very deterministic because  most of the times we need to synchronize it with [11:26] some video or other actions that are happening in  the system. From the top what is coming to us is [11:33] actually what we call an account federation layer.  Why is it account federation or just account? In [11:38] our world, we deal with multiple accounts  and most probably some of you will do too. [11:42] We deal with a user identity. The user will bring  multiple accounts with them. In the middle of [11:48] all of that sits the orchestration AI and she is  actually talking and working with the user graph, [11:53] the device graphs, but eventually also for example  with usage and content graphs. We are overall then [12:02] connecting all of this to the outside world.  We are not building this for ourselves, [12:07] right? The user must be making this part of their  his own ecosystem. So we need to connect it to [12:14] other accounts. We need to connect  it to other services on the AI layer. [12:19] Very important. The all the content needs to  come in. And then there are control systems. [12:24] It is important that by the way this here  is not a replacement for small things matter [12:30] or anything like that. Actually it's working  with them. Right? We want to actually talk to [12:34] smart things to matter to other such systems  because to create a really good experience [12:41] I want to control the room not only the  audio and the video I want to control the [12:45] lighting or in the car the HVAC to create  the experience that my user actually needs. [12:51] Now some of you are mo most probably in cyber  security and you look at this picture and you say [12:56] oh my god and I can agree because the  attack surface of such a system is massive. [13:06] the parameter that you now need to defend  with all these connections inside the system, [13:11] outside of the system. We can try to guard  rail all of this, but if we getting too tight, [13:18] then the system is actually losing its agency  and the magic goes away. If we don't do that, [13:23] actually it might overstep and we are opening up  for bad actors. So one of the key design choices [13:29] that we made is that trust and security are  a boundary condition and no longer an option. [13:39] Now it's very easy for me to stand here and say  okay this is it this is the problem everyone not [13:46] off we go next session. Um most probably that  would not be very helpful. So let me tell you [13:51] a little bit about what we found on our journey  so you might not have to make the same mistakes. [13:59] The first and foremost is like this is the  picture from the beginning, right? We firmly [14:03] believe that the world of the abentricity  is gone and everything goes multimodal. [14:08] Will the app move and and go away just tomorrow?  No, most probably not. But the advent of the [14:14] voice interaction together for example with bio  signals in our world bio signals are a big thing. [14:19] If I know how stressed my user is or how relaxed,  I can adjust actually my experience. I can also [14:26] test in real time how successful the decision of  my orchestration AI was. The challenge if you ever [14:33] build a system like this, I guess you know is  everything about latency. What keeps me up at [14:38] night is latency. After 500 milliseconds  the user disengagements whether this is [14:43] from utterance to utterance so the machine or the  user is asking something the machine is answering [14:48] or is utterance to action where the user is asking  for so for example play this and that in my living [14:54] room and if it takes seconds and seconds it's like  the user is asking himself or herself did it work [15:01] right is something wrong if you consider a  sequence flow of such a single task there are [15:07] hundreds of tasks going up and down between the  edge devices and multiple cloud components to make [15:13] the single thing work. So every 10 milliseconds  of optimization are very valuable to us. [15:21] The way how we approach it is that we decided for  a very strong hybrid system architecture where [15:28] the edge itself is quite powerful in the  constraints of the bill of material. We are [15:33] talking about consumer devices and those consumer  devices are optimized on the bill of material [15:39] down to the scent. And then we optimize also for  example token usage because again this can become [15:46] very much cost prohibitive in a world where a  headphone of $100 is also joining your ecosystem [15:54] and is incurring for example token usage.  So again this is down optimized to descent. [16:01] The second thing and this is for me the most  exciting moment I think for the last two decades [16:07] in consumer electronics in automotive  is really orchestration AI. [16:11] What this will do to the user experience we  can see already the first indications today the [16:16] the probability that this will land is really  really high. We are preparing for that. [16:22] This is a technical challenge. Yes. But however,  the biggest challenge you're going to face is the [16:30] understanding of the organization. AI companies  most probably are not the consumer parsing, [16:37] UX parsing company at their core, while the  consumer electronics companies are not necessarily [16:44] the AI companies at their core. Nonetheless, you  need both of them. If you don't have both of those [16:49] insights and both of the knowledge and both of the  expertise you will not build the adequate system [16:56] and then eventually where we are very clear the  experience needs to be cross domain. The magic [17:02] happens when you stop listening to music at your  home on your power system. You go into your Volvo, [17:09] your power system greets you, say, "Shall we um  complete now the listening session where we where [17:14] you dropped off? And by the way, shall I bring  over your preferred audio settings into the car?" [17:21] This is very powerful once you experience such a  demo. So to sum this up, I think you get already [17:32] an idea that this is a big journey and this is  a journey that we believe we cannot walk alone. [17:42] So if you believe based on what you saw that  hey I have a solution that would really help [17:48] such a system, I have technology, I have content  or I simply want to be part of creating that. [17:55] Well, you should take a photograph,  right? Use the QR code, send us a ping, [18:01] and then let's start with the conversation. And  with that, I think I am 1 minute 16 down. You're [18:07] running a very tight ship, guys. And that is  it. Everything I had. Thank you very much.