Boeing Cuts App Build Time to 48 Hours with Enterprise AI

AI That Knows Boeing: Inside the Cockpit of Our GenAI Strategy With Boeing — Ai4

Ai4

Boeing scaled internal Generative AI to 38,000 daily active users by deploying proprietary models within a private cloud to eliminate data leaks and hallucinations.

AI-assisted summary of AI That Knows Boeing: Inside the Cockpit of Our GenAI Strategy With Boeing — original source. Check the original for full context.

Source published:

Detailed notes

## Background Published by Ai4 on YouTube on August 28, 2025, this video captures a presentation delivered by Abhi Seth, Chief Enterprise AI & Data Officer at Boeing. According to the page description, the session focuses on exploring the inside of Boeing's GenAI strategy from the cockpit perspective.

## TL;DR Abhi Seth details Boeing's enterprise-wide Generative AI implementation, addressing how the 108-year-old aerospace giant balances rapid technology adoption with strict security, zero-trust microservices, and hallucination controls. The presentation covers key milestones like rolling out Boeing Conversational AI to 170,000 employees, establishing a GenAI Academy, and reducing custom app deployment time to under 48 hours. Seth highlights tangible high-impact applications across engineering, shop-floor manufacturing non-conformance reports, legacy drawing computer vision enhancements, and automated safety risk classification.

## Atmosphere & style The session carries a highly professional, pragmatic, and authoritative tone tailored for an enterprise technology audience. Seth presents with measured confidence, balancing the vast legacy and safety-critical nature of aerospace engineering with forward-looking technical innovation. The atmosphere feels grounded and structured, avoiding speculative AI hype in favor of concrete metrics, architectural diagrams, and real-world operational impact.

## Key takeaways - [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=4s) Boeing leverages a 108-year aerospace legacy to deploy enterprise Generative AI across 170,000 global employees and 62,000 engineers. - [00:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=32s) Aerospace constraints require zero tolerance for hallucinations, mandatory source attribution, and bidirectional linking for engineering specifications. - [00:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=58s) To prevent data leakage, Boeing built a Zero Trust microservices architecture integrating enterprise IAM and hosting LLMs in a private cloud. - [00:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=58s) Boeing deployed its internal Conversational AI platform to 170,000 employees in 12 weeks, with adoption reaching 38,000 daily active users across 53 countries. - [10:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=603s) Standardized architecture templates allow Boeing functional teams to build and deploy custom GenAI applications in under 48 hours. - [12:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=726s) RAG implementation unlocked 7 million engineering documents across 28 share drives, providing instant paragraph-level source citations. - [17:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1033s) GenAI is prohibited directly on aircraft flight control systems, but is heavily used on the factory floor to classify safety and quality risk reports into 14 categories. - [18:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1122s) Data classification mechanisms enforce ITAR and clearance rules at a granular document level without blocking global workforce collaboration. - [20:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1223s) To eliminate shadow IT risks and secure corporate IP, external public LLM access was disabled in favor of internal tools updated within 6 hours of new model releases. - [23:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1388s) Computer vision tools automatically enhance faint legacy engineering drawings directly inside mechanics' software, handling 25,000 requests per day. - [25:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1512s) While rapid RAG builds take 48 hours, Boeing conducts 2 to 3 weeks of SME Q&A validation before releasing applications to production. - [27:36](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1656s) Modular RAG architecture separates vector databases from foundation models, enabling seamless LLM upgrades without disrupting underlying enterprise data.

## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=4s) Boeing's 108-Year Legacy and the Scale of Enterprise AI

Abhi Seth, Chief Enterprise AI & Data Officer at Boeing, opens the session by reflecting on the company's 108-year history defining the future of aviation, spanning commercial aerospace, defense systems, and space travel. To set the backdrop for Boeing's Generative AI journey over the past two years, Seth outlines the company's core mission—connecting, protecting, and exploring the world sustainably—across its three primary business divisions. Commercial Airplanes has been redefining flight since the first Boeing Model 1 (B&W) seaplane flew in 1916. Defense, Space & Security provides national security deterrence, highlighted by their work on the F-15EX Eagle II / F-47 sixth-generation fighter jet capabilities. Global Services acts as a customer service champion, maintaining fleet safety and minimizing operational downtime for both commercial airlines and military customers.

Seth emphasizes that while AI hype shifted toward agentic workflows in 2024, Boeing's involvement in advanced technology spans decades. The aerospace giant has relied on physics-based modeling, virtual reality, and simulation for many years, alongside traditional AI and machine learning investments. However, implementing Generative AI across a massive global workforce—comprising 170,000 employees in 65 countries, including 62,000 engineers—presents a distinct governance challenge that requires balancing rapid technological adoption with strict responsibility, ethics, transparency, and model robustness.

- Every 2 seconds, a Boeing commercial aircraft takes off or lands somewhere across the globe. - Boeing aircraft have transported approximately half of the world's population over time. - Total global headcount spans 170,000 employees, featuring a technical base of 62,000 engineers.

[00:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=32s) Core Challenges: Precision, Security, and Traceability in Aerospace

When approaching Generative AI in the highly regulated aerospace domain, a "good enough" or plausible-sounding answer is completely unacceptable. Seth highlights the critical risks associated with early enterprise adoption of LLMs, particularly data leaks of proprietary company secrets and model hallucinations. Engineering designs and technical documentation require absolute accuracy and traceability to authoritative sources. In aerospace workflows, AI must not fabricate answers or cite unverified information, making strict controls and source attribution mandatory before any AI output can be trusted by employees.

To navigate these constraints without throttling innovation, Boeing established a strategy centered on elevating employee AI literacy while establishing stringent guardrails. Seth notes that simply banning AI tools was never a viable option because employees would inevitably seek out public alternatives. The core mission became providing a secure, internal ecosystem where workforce members across all 65 countries could safely leverage frontier models while fully protecting Boeing's 108 years of proprietary domain knowledge.

- Primary risks addressed: Accidental leaks of proprietary data on public LLM platforms, unverified AI hallucinations, and loss of document lineage. - Strict requirement for authoritative sources: Engineering and process documentation must maintain direct bidirectional linking to underlying specifications.

[00:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=58s) The Technical Foundation: Zero Trust, Hallucination Control, and RAG Metadata

To secure proprietary data across all enterprise interactions, Boeing built a microservices architecture operating on strict Zero Trust principles. Security mechanisms are embedded directly inside every individual application layer—from the front-end user interfaces to back-end execution logic and data access repositories. This setup integrates dynamically with Boeing's enterprise Identity and Access Management (IAM) infrastructure to enforce fine-grained access permissions based on employee credentials and geography.

``` +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | User / Employee Client | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | v +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | Identity & Access Management (IAM) | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | v +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | Microservices Zero Trust Fabric | | +--------------------+ +------------------+ +-------------+ | | | Front-End Controls | | Back-End Logic | | Data Access | | | +--------------------+ +------------------+ +-------------+ | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | v +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | Boeing Private Cloud Virtual Network | | +--------------------+ +-----------------------------------+ | | | Hosted Self-LLMs | | Enterprise RAG & Metadata Stores | | | +--------------------+ +-----------------------------------+ | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ ```

To eliminate hallucinations and prevent data leakage outside the enterprise perimeter, Boeing brings Large Language Models directly into its private Virtual Private Cloud (VPC). The engineering team applies hyperparameter tuning—such as strictly capping the model's temperature—and enforces prompt-level system instructions mandating that the model explicitly state when it lacks the information rather than inventing an answer. For factual accuracy, Boeing enhanced its Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipeline to ingest detailed document metadata alongside text content, preserving crucial context such as author identity, document classification, and official authorization status.

- In July 2023, Boeing published and deployed enterprise-wide Generative AI usage guidelines to 170,000 employees. - The company launched the "GenAI Academy"—a free internal educational platform covering effective prompt engineering, safety considerations, and enterprise use cases. - In November 2023, Boeing built and launched "Boeing Conversational AI" in 12 weeks, scaling it to all 170,000 employees by January 2024. - Industry partners such as Microsoft confirmed that Boeing was among the very first global enterprises to deploy a secure GenAI application at this scale.

[10:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=603s) Enterprise Impact: Adoption Metrics and 48-Hour App Deployment

After nearly 20 months of active enterprise deployment, Boeing Conversational AI has become a core component of daily operations. The platform counts 38,000 active daily users across 53 countries. Internal user surveys reveal that the tool saves individual team members between 1 to 2 hours per day. Furthermore, Boeing's GenAI Academy has trained over 8,000 employees, cultivating a specialized network of 2,600 "super users" who actively build custom AI workflows on the underlying platform.

Through standardized architecture patterns and reusable microservices templates, Boeing reduced the development cycle for new GenAI applications to under 48 hours. This rapid deployment enables functional groups—such as Finance, HR, and Supply Chain—to replace unwieldy, hundreds-of-pages-long procedure manuals and informal "personal notes" with specialized AI co-pilots. These co-pilots deliver zero-hallucination, compliance-verified answers directly to employees during daily tasks.

- Active daily footprint: 38,000 users spanning 53 countries, saving 1–2 hours per user daily. - Community growth: 8,000 GenAI Academy graduates and 2,600 active super-user developers. - Rapid prototyping: New custom enterprise GenAI use cases deploy from concept to functional build in under 48 hours.

[12:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=726s) Unlocking Engineering Data, Mechanics' Quality Tags, and Support Automation

Seth outlines several high-impact enterprise use cases, starting with Product Development. Engineering teams previously faced massive friction locating design standards and historical procedures dispersed across 7 million documents stored in 28 separate network share drives. Finding relevant specifications previously took days. Boeing's custom RAG implementation unlocked these repositories with full source traceability, allowing engineers to ask a question, receive a precise summary, and click directly through to the exact document, paragraph, and page source.

In manufacturing and assembly, the platform assists shop-floor mechanics and quality inspectors with Non-Conformance Reports (NCRs). When physical quality issues or non-conformance tags arise during airplane assembly, mechanics must resolve and sign off on the issue before the plane moves down the production line. GenAI applications aggregate and index tens of thousands of historical NCRs, allowing mechanics to search past solutions, draft new NCR records automatically, and identify proven resolution strategies instantly.

``` +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | Boeing Knowledge Ecosystem | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | | v v +---------------------------+ +---------------------------+ | Product Development RAG | | Shop-Floor Mechanics | | 7M documents / 28 drives | | Non-Conformance Records | | Instant paragraph citation| | Automated resolution match| +---------------------------+ +---------------------------+ | | +-------------------+-------------------+ | v +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | Enterprise Functional Support | | +----------------------------------+ +---------------------+ | | | Finance Policy & Closing Co-Pilot| | IT Help Desk Bot | | | | 1,000+ active users | | Instant resolution | | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ ```

Beyond engineering, Seth details an unexpected success story with the Finance Co-pilot. Created to help teams navigate complex finance policies—such as determining whether expenditures should be capitalized or expensed during annual planning—the tool was initially launched and left unattended. Six months later, analytics revealed over 1,000 active finance users leveraging the tool, resulting in faster month-end financial closings with significantly fewer human errors. Similarly, an automated IT Help Desk chatbot replaced lengthy phone wait times and high per-call third-party service costs by providing real-time technical troubleshooting based on internal knowledge base articles.

- Knowledge repository scale: Ingested 7 million engineering and design documents across 28 share drives to provide instant paragraph-level source links. - Model agility: When OpenAI released GPT-5, Boeing integrated the model into Boeing Conversational AI within 6 hours. - Enterprise App Portfolio: Over 70 custom, domain-specific GenAI applications leveraging internal Boeing data are currently deployed across the business.

[16:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=987s) Demonstrating ROI and the Value of Generative AI

Abhi Seth highlights the tangible business outcomes achieved through Boeing's Generative AI implementations. Call volumes and costs have decreased while employee satisfaction has risen, serving as proof that Generative AI delivers concrete value beyond industry hype. Traditional machine learning provided significant benefits in the past, but the speed of GenAI adoption is unprecedented. When applied securely through a responsible, reusable architectural pattern, GenAI yields massive value.

- **Key Outcomes:** Reduced call volume, lower operational costs, and higher employee satisfaction. - **Architectural Approach:** Emphasizes secure, responsible, and reusable integration patterns.

---

[17:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1033s) Safety Risk Management and Quality Control

When asked whether Generative AI is deployed directly in flight control systems or on aircraft, Seth clarifies that GenAI is not used on airplanes due to potential model errors. Instead, Boeing utilizes GenAI on the shop floor to process human inputs across various safety and quality reporting systems. Employees submit risk reports into multiple disjointed databases, making manual analysis difficult. GenAI ingests these inputs in real time, classifies them according to Boeing's 14 structured risk categories, and assigns risk levels (low, medium, or high). This allows quality teams to identify systemic risks efficiently, supporting Boeing's safety mission.

- **Aircraft Systems:** No Generative AI is used directly on plane control or flight safety systems. - **Shop Floor Application:** Real-time ingestion and classification of quality/safety risks reported by employees across multiple systems. - **Risk Taxonomy:** Automated sorting across **14 distinct risk categories** and severity levels (low, medium, high).

---

[18:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1122s) Data Governance vs. AI Expansion: Managing Security & ITAR

An audience member raises the conflict between information governance (which favors data retention limits for compliance and litigation) and GenAI (which relies on large datasets). Seth explains that Boeing's primary challenge is data classification rather than data minimization. Boeing manages complex defense designs, commercial airplane designs, and derivative aircraft that mix both domain types. Overseeing access controls across diverse employee nationalities and international sites requires granular categorization.

``` +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | Boeing Design Documents | | (Commercial, Defense, & Mixed Derivative Designs) | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | v +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | Granular AI Data Classification | | (Identifies ITAR, IP, & Clearance Constraints) | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | v +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | Role-Based Enterprise Access | | (Delivers appropriate access based on citizenship & role) | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ ```

- **Granular Classification:** AI tags documents at a fine level to ensure ITAR and proprietary defense data are restricted based on clearance and citizenship without broadly blocking general access. - **Global Compliance:** Enables Boeing's expanding global workforce to access permitted documents securely.

---

[20:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1223s) Enterprise Adoption Metrics and Internal Security Controls

Discussing user adoption figures, Seth addresses a question regarding statistics showing **170,000 onboarded users** compared to **38,000 active users**. He notes that achieving 38,000 active users among non-technical employees within two years represents substantial adoption. A large portion of Boeing's factory workforce builds airplanes directly and does not use personal computers. A notable metric is that over **2,000 employees use the internal GenAI platform on weekends**.

To prevent data leaks, Boeing disabled external access to public GPTs once its secure internal platform matured. The platform operates under a target response window of **within 6 hours of a new LLM release**, ensuring employees have rapid access to state-of-the-art models within a secure environment permitted to process Boeing proprietary and ITAR-regulated data.

- **User Base:** 170,000 onboarded users, 38,000 active enterprise users, and 2,000 weekend active users. - **Time Savings:** Employees report drafting customer emails in 10 minutes, down from 2 hours. - **Shadow IT Mitigation:** Access to external LLMs was blocked in favor of the internal secure portal. - **Model Deployment Speed:** New LLM releases are brought into the secure environment within 6 hours.

---

[23:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1388s) Computer Vision on the Factory Floor: Legacy Drawing Optimization

Seth shares a practical application of AI in manufacturing. During quality stand-downs, mechanics reported issues reading faint engineering drawings from legacy systems containing tens of millions of documents spanning multiple aircraft generations. Previously, faint drawings were sent to an external vendor (Xerox) to be manually darkened, scanned, and re-uploaded—a process that was slow and expensive.

Boeing developed a computer vision tool that identifies faint regions across thousands of drawings and automatically darkens them. This capability was integrated directly into the decades-old drawing software via a single button for mechanics.

- **Legacy Database Size:** Tens of millions of engineering drawings across multiple generations of aircraft. - **Usage:** The automated drawing enhancement button is used **25,000 times per day** by factory mechanics.

---

[25:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1512s) RAG Evaluation, Subject Matter Expert Validation, and Air-Gapped Environments

When asked how Boeing validates 48-hour Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) deployments, Seth emphasizes that build speed must be paired with rigorous validation. AI adoption in manufacturing relies on change management and user trust. After assembling a RAG solution in 48 hours, the team spends two to three weeks working alongside subject matter experts (SMEs).

``` +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | Build Rapid RAG (48 Hours) | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | v +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | SME Q&A Testing (2-3 Weeks) | | (Engineers generate and validate question-answer sets) | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | v +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | Model Refinement & Fine-Tuning | | (Iterative adjustment based on SME feedback) | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | v +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | Production Deployment | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ ```

Regarding air-gapped classified networks, Seth notes that the primary GenAI system is deployed on unclassified networks. Air-gapped classified environments require localized infrastructure and dedicated local LLMs due to isolated network requirements.

- **Validation Workflow:** Iterative question-and-answer testing with SMEs over 2-3 weeks prior to production release. - **Classified Networks:** Air-gapped environments rely on local LLMs and local infrastructure.

---

[27:36](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1656s) Upgrading Underlying LLMs in Modular RAG Architectures

An audience member asks how knowledge is transferred when upgrading to newer foundation models. Seth clarifies that Boeing does not train foundational LLMs from scratch. Instead, new models are integrated into the existing secure enterprise interface as they are released.

Because Boeing's applications rely on a modular RAG architecture, vector databases, search pipelines, and security controls reside within the RAG layer rather than the LLM itself. When upgrading from models like GPT-4 or GPT-4.5 to future releases, the underlying vector database remains intact, allowing the newer model to deliver more articulate answers without requiring modifications to the core data infrastructure.

## Notable quotes > [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=4s) Every 2 seconds, a Boeing commercial aircraft takes off or lands somewhere across the globe. — Abhi Seth

> [00:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=58s) In July 2023, Boeing published and deployed enterprise-wide Generative AI usage guidelines to 170,000 employees.

> [00:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=58s) In November 2023, Boeing built and launched "Boeing Conversational AI" in 12 weeks, scaling it to all 170,000 employees by January 2024.

> [10:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=603s) Active daily footprint: 38,000 users spanning 53 countries, saving 1–2 hours per user daily.

> [10:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=603s) Rapid prototyping: New custom enterprise GenAI use cases deploy from concept to functional build in under 48 hours.

> [12:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=726s) When OpenAI released GPT-5, Boeing integrated the model into Boeing Conversational AI within 6 hours.

> [12:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=726s) Over 70 custom, domain-specific GenAI applications leveraging internal Boeing data are currently deployed across the business.

> [17:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1033s) No Generative AI is used directly on plane control or flight safety systems. — Abhi Seth

> [17:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1033s) Automated sorting across 14 distinct risk categories and severity levels (low, medium, high).

> [20:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1223s) Access to external LLMs was blocked in favor of the internal secure portal.

> [23:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1388s) The automated drawing enhancement button is used 25,000 times per day by factory mechanics.

## Mentioned Abhi Seth, Boeing, Boeing Model 1 (B&W), F-15EX Eagle II, F-47, Commercial Airplanes, Defense, Space & Security, Global Services, Boeing Conversational AI, GenAI Academy, Microsoft, OpenAI, GPT-4, GPT-4.5, GPT-5, Xerox, ITAR

## Video description Abhi Seth, Chief Enterprise AI & Data Officer, Boeing

[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs)

中文简报

波音借助企业级AI将应用构建时间缩短至48小时 波音通过在私有云中部署专有模型以杜绝数据泄露与幻觉,成功将内部生成式AI扩展至3.8万日活跃用户。 Abhi Seth 详细介绍了波音在全企业推行生成式AI的实践经验,阐述了这家拥有108年历史的航空航天巨头如何在快速应用新技术的同时,兼顾严格的安全保障、零信任微服务架构以及幻觉控制。内容涵盖了多项关键里程碑,例如向17万名员工推广波音对话式AI(Boeing Conversational AI)、设立生成式AI学院,以及将定制应用的部署时间缩短至48小时以内。Seth 还重点展示了多项切实且高影响力的实际应用,涉及工程设计、车间制造不符合项报告处理、基于计算机视觉的传统图纸增强,以及自动化安全风险分类。 波音基于零信任微服务架构在私有云中部署生成式 AI,在 12 周内面向全公司 17 万名员工推出内部平台,目前日活跃用户已达 3.8 万人,平均每天为每位用户节省 1 至 2 小时。 (0:58) 波音通过 RAG(检索增强生成)技术盘活了 28 个共享盘中的 700 万份工程文档,实现段落级精准溯源,并借助标准化架构模板将定制 GenAI 应用的开发构建周期缩短至 48 小时以内。 (12:06) 波音明确禁止在飞机飞行控制系统中直接使用生成式 AI,但将其广泛用于制造车间,实时分析并归纳员工提交的安全与质量风险报告,自动划入 14 个风险类别及相应严重等级。 (17:13) 为满足航空航天严苛的保密合规要求,波音利用细粒度数据分类机制严格执行 ITAR(国际武器贸易条例)与国防机密权限管控,在杜绝数据泄露的同时保障全球员工安全协作。 (18:42)

Reading summary

Boeing Chief Enterprise AI & Data Officer Abhi Seth details how the aerospace company deployed an internal Generative AI ecosystem across its 170,000-employee workforce, prioritizing proprietary data protection, traceability, and modular architectures over public tools or unvetted automation. Security Architecture and Zero-Trust Guardrails (0:58) Operating in a strict aerospace regulatory environment, Boeing rejects plausible-sounding model hallucinations and unverified data generation. Because an outright ban would drive staff to external tools, the enterprise brought Large Language Models directly into a private Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) governed by a Zero Trust microservices architecture. Security layers integrate dynamically with Boeing's Identity and Access Management infrastructure to control data queries by employee role, geography, and clearance. To ensure technical accuracy, Boeing limits model temperature and mandates that models explicitly acknowledge missing data rather than fabricating responses. Its Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines ingest detailed document metadata—such as authorship, authorization status, and classification tiers—enforcing bidirectional linking directly to underlying specifications before outputs reach users. Enterprise Adoption and Rapid Application Deployment (10:03) Boeing Conversational AI was built in 12 weeks and scaled across the company between late 2023 and early 2024. The internal platform records 38,000 active daily users across 53 countries, with an internal survey reporting daily time savings of 1 to 2 hours per user. Outside regular workdays, over 2,000 employees access the system on weekends. To prevent proprietary leaks, Boeing disabled external access to public consumer LLMs once internal tools matured, while committing to integrate newly released foundation models into the secure perimeter within six hours. Adoption is supported by internal education. Over 8,000 staff have completed the company's GenAI Academy, creating a network of 2,600 super-users who develop custom solutions. Standardized microservice templates have reduced prototyping cycles for custom enterprise applications to under 48 hours, enabling functional groups like Finance and IT to deploy more than 70 domain-specific tools that replace dense procedure manuals with interactive co-pilots. Engineering, Manufacturing, and Quality Operations (12:06) In product engineering, RAG workflows index 7 million design and standard documents scattered across 28 share drives, replacing multi-day searches with instant paragraph-level citations. On assembly lines, the system searches tens of thousands of historical Non-Conformance Reports (NCRs), allowing mechanics to reference past resolutions and generate new records quickly when assembly defects arise. Boeing also applies AI to quality triage and legacy systems. Factory safety and quality reports from disconnected databases are parsed in real time and categorized into 14 distinct risk classifications to surface systemic manufacturing issues. Additionally, an internal computer vision tool darkens faint legacy engineering drawings across an archive of tens of millions of records, a single-button utility integrated into decades-old software that factory mechanics use 25,000 times daily. ITAR Compliance and Modular Foundation Upgrades (18:42) Because Boeing handles mixed commercial, defense, and derivative aircraft designs, managing data requires fine-grained AI classification rather than data minimization. Automated document tagging identifies International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) constraints, proprietary trade secrets, and security clearance requirements, ensuring compliant access for an international workforce without blanket restrictions. To decouple proprietary enterprise knowledge from underlying foundational models, Boeing maintains its vector databases, search logic, and access guardrails within the modular RAG layer rather than training models from scratch. Foundation model upgrades improve conversational articulation without altering the underlying vector store. While primary deployments run on unclassified corporate networks, classified environments remain air-gapped, requiring local LLMs on isolated infrastructure. Seth stresses that Generative AI is strictly excluded from flight-control and onboard safety systems due to error risks. While rapid prototyping enables 48-hour application assemblies, Boeing mandates two to three weeks of iterative question-and-answer validation by subject matter experts before releasing tools into production workflows.

精炼阅读摘要

波音公司企业AI与数据首席官Abhi Seth指出,波音在拥有170,000名员工的全球航天体系中,依托零信任与模块化检索增强生成(RAG)架构推进生成式AI部署;在严格禁止AI介入机载飞行控制系统的前提下,公司通过受控的私有环境与专家核验机制,将大语言模型深度应用于工程研发、制造质检与职能运营。 零信任数据架构与幻觉控制机制 (0:58) 在受到强监管的航空航天领域,工程设计与技术规程对精确性有着严苛要求,生成式AI的数据泄露与幻觉输出构成了核心风险。波音并未采取简单封禁的策略,而是将基础大语言模型引入私有虚拟云(VPC),并构建了遵循零信任原则的微服务架构。该架构将安全机制深度嵌入前端界面、后端逻辑和数据访问层,并与企业身份和访问管理(IAM)集成,依据员工资质与国籍动态分配权限,以此保障《国际武器贸易条例》(ITAR)限制数据与企业专有知识资产的合规隔离。 为遏制模型幻觉并保证工程方案的可追溯性,波音研发团队采取超参数约束(如严格限制模型采样温度),并在提示词中设定强制系统指令,要求模型在缺乏可信信息时主动声明而非臆造答案。同时,波音升级了检索增强生成(RAG)管线,在索引文本内容的同时深度结合了文档作者、密级与官方审批状态等关键元数据,确保技术文档与底层规范维持精准的双向引用验证。 替代影子IT:内网生态与超速部署 (10:03) 为了防范员工自发使用外部公开模型造成的技术机密外泄,波音于2023年7月向全员发布AI应用指南,随后历时12周开发出内部专属的“波音对话式AI”(Boeing Conversational AI),并在2024年1月向全球65个国家的170,000名员工推广。随着内部合规平台的成熟,波音彻底切断了员工访问外部公开GPT的通道,同时设立免费的“生成式AI学院”培训了逾8,000名员工,孕育出2,600名能够构建定制工作流的超级用户。 目前该平台拥有来自53个国家的38,000名日活跃用户,甚至在周末也有超过2,000名员工在线使用;用户反馈单人每日可节省1至2小时,起草客户邮件等业务耗时从2小时大幅压缩至10分钟。为了跟进模型演进速度,波音建立了高效的引入机制,确保在新模型发布后6小时内将其纳进企业私有安全环境供员工使用。 核心制造与运维:从图纸识别到风险治理 (12:06) 在工程研发方面,波音针对分散在28个网络共享盘中的700万份设计规范与历史档案建立了RAG知识索引,将过去需要耗费数天的规范检索转变为带精确段落与页面来源链接的即时查询。在飞机制造与装配现场,该平台集成了数万份历史不合格品报告(NCR),辅助车间技工和质检员自动检索既往处置方案并起草记录。面对老旧飞机图纸字迹模糊影响作业的痛点,波音部署了计算机视觉工具自动识别并加深淡化线条,该工具嵌入历史系统后每日被车间技工调用达25,000次,替代了以往耗时昂贵的外部翻拍外包流程。 针对安全关键环节,Seth明确表示生成式AI绝不直接用于飞机控制或飞行安全系统。在工厂端,AI主要用于实时汇总员工向多个割裂数据库提交的安全与质量隐患,自动按14个结构化风险类别归类并划分高、中、低严重等级,辅助质量团队排查系统性风险。此外,波音已投产超过70个定制领域AI应用,包括涵盖1,000多名活跃用户的财务政策助理与IT服务台聊天机器人,明显减少了月度财务结算的人为偏差与支持服务成本。 敏捷构建与模块化架构下的严苛验证 (25:12) 依托标准化的架构模式与可复用微服务模板,波音已将生成式AI新应用的开发原型周期缩短至48小时以内。然而,研发的高敏捷度伴随着极为审慎的投产验证。Seth强调,48小时构建完成的应用方案必须由业务领域专家(SME)进行为期2至3周的封闭式问答测试与微调,在全面验证事实精确度并确立用户信任后方可正式投入生产。 在底层架构上,波音采用了完全解耦的模块化RAG方案,将向量数据库、检索逻辑与安全访问控制剥离于基础模型之外。当引入更新一代的基础大语言模型时,底层核心数据索引库无需重建,即可平滑获得更强大的表述与推理性能。针对处理高度涉密国防数据的物理隔离(Air-Gapped)网络,波音则采用独立的本地基础设施与专有本地模型运行,与商业及民用网络保持严格物理隔离。 波音的实践展现了在极度强调安全与合规的重工业环境中,通过私有化微服务和模块化RAG架构平衡前沿AI技术与数据风控的可行路径。尽管AI在文档检索、制造质检与运营支持上展现了量化收益,但在大量一线装配工人缺乏PC终端的现实下,如何在多国籍协作、涉密防务数据严格分类与物理隔离网络限制中进一步扩大AI的应用深度,依然是其后续面临的长期挑战。

Detailed notes — zh

## Background 该内容由 Ai4 于 2025 年 8 月 28 日发布在 YouTube 平台上。视频展示了波音公司首席企业 AI 与数据官 Abhi Seth 在大会上的演讲,分享了波音内部生成式 AI 战略的探索与实践路线。 ## TL;DR 波音公司首席企业 AI 与数据官 Abhi Seth 详细介绍了波音如何将生成式 AI 规模化应用于高监管的航空航天领域。面对数据安全、幻觉抑制及严格的可追溯性挑战,波音建立了基于零信任架构与私有云 VPC 的安全基础设施,并推出了涵盖工程设计、质量控制、财务及 IT 服务的定制化 Copilot 应用。此外,演讲还探讨了如何通过 AI 细粒度分类处理敏感数据、嵌入计算机视觉改善老旧工程图纸流程,以及结合领域专家验证快速部署 RAG 架构的实践经验。 ## Atmosphere & style 整场演讲呈现出高度专业、务实且严谨的工业界科技前沿风格。演讲者逻辑清晰、自信昂扬,既展现了对百年波音传统工程底蕴的自豪感,又传达出在 AI 时代勇于开拓创新、严控风险的技术自信。问答环节互动积极,气氛专业而深入,展现了前沿生成式 AI 技术与传统高端制造业碰撞时所产生的务实洞察与变革活力。 ## Key takeaways - [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=4s) 波音拥有108年航空沉淀与17万名员工,致力于在商用飞机、国防安全及全球服务三大领域推动安全与可持续发展。 - [02:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=144s) 在航空业落地生成式 AI 需克服四大核心挑战:数据安全与隐私、严格抑制幻觉、工程与技术文档的可追溯性,以及平衡创新与风险。 - [05:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=358s) 波音构建了微服务零信任架构(Zero-Trust),结合私有云(VPC)与超参数调优(如降低 Temperature)来严格抑制模型幻觉。 - [05:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=358s) 通过在 RAG 检索增强架构中引入授权源、作者等丰富元数据,波音确保生成的每一条内容均可精准追溯至权威来源。 - [08:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=523s) 波音仅历时 12 周便推出了内部安全的“波音对话式 AI”,并于 2024 年 1 月直接向全球 17 万名员工全面开放,而非缓慢试点。 - [10:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=603s) 已有 3.8 万名活跃用户在 53 个国家/地区使用内部 AI 平台,平均每天为每位使用者节省 1 至 2 小时工作时间。 - [10:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=603s) 波音已部署 70 多款基于内部数据的定制 GenAI 应用,覆盖 700 万份工程文档检索、不合格处理(NCR)、财务 Copilot 及 IT 服务台等场景。 - [10:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=603s) 内部生成式 AI 平台能够实现新用例开发 48 小时内完成部署,并在 GPT-5 等新外部大模型发布后 6 小时内快速接入。 - [16:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=987s) 波音明确表示绝对不会在飞机飞行控制系统上使用生成式 AI,但利用其对车间一线报告的 14 种安全风险进行自动化分类与治理。 - [18:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1122s) 通过引入 AI 细粒度数据分类,波音在满足国防出口法规(如 ITAR)和数据安全前提下,精细化管控权限,打破信息孤岛。 - [20:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1223s) 为防止敏感数据泄露,波音在内部平台成熟后彻底封锁了所有外部通用 GPT 及第三方 GenAI 工具的访问权限。 - [23:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1388s) 通过在几十年历史的老旧工程图纸系统中嵌入计算机视觉(CV)局部加深算法,解决图纸模糊痛点,日使用量达 2.5 万次。 - [25:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1512s) 波音的 RAG 架构快速构建后需配合领域专家(SME)进行 2 至 3 周的严谨测试与验证,以确保模型输出准确度并建立用户信任。 - [25:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1512s) 波音采用将 RAG 架构与底层大模型解耦的设计,升级至 GPT-5 等新模型时无需重建向量数据库,仅需无缝替换组件。 ## Detailed walkthrough 根据您提供的视频转录内容与背景信息,以下是该前半部分演讲的详细、准确且完整的整理与记录: ### [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=4s) 108年的航空沉淀与波音的使命 演讲者 Abhi Seth(波音公司首席企业 AI 与数据官)以非常荣幸的心情代表波音公司(Boeing)开启了这场分享。波音在过去 108 年间一直定义着航空业的未来,其业务版图横跨航天器、国防系统以及大家非常熟悉的商用航空。波音的核心使命在于“连接、保护与探索世界”,并致力于推动地球的可持续发展。 波音的主要业务由三大板块支撑: * **商用飞机(Commercial Airplanes):** 缩短人与人之间的距离。自 1916 年波音首架水上飞机(Boeing Model 1 / B&W Seaplane)起飞以来,公司就一直在重塑飞行。 * **国防、空间与安全(Defense, Space & Security):** 专注于国家安全与威慑力。演讲者特别提到了构建 F-47 这款最为先进的第六代战斗机(6th generation fighter jet),表达了对该领域蓬勃发展的无比兴奋。 * **全球服务(Global Services):** 致力于成为服务标杆,帮助客户解决各种复杂难题,最大程度减少航空公司和国防客户的停机时间,保障飞机安全飞行。 此外,波音每天都有庞大的业务流转:平均每 2 秒就有一架波音客机起飞或降落,历史上累积运送的乘客数量已近乎全球人口的一半。 - 波音的历史可追溯至 1916 年首飞的 SE 水上飞机(B&W Seaplane),至今已有 108 年历史。 - 全球员工总数约为 170,000 人,分布在 65 个国家和地区,其中包括 62,000 名工程师。 - 波音在物理建模、虚拟现实(VR)和模拟仿真领域拥有数十年的技术积累,在 AI 和机器学习(ML)领域也已投入研究数十年。 ### [02:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=144s) 航空业落地生成式 AI 的核心挑战 当生成式 AI(GenAI)在 2022 至 2023 年爆发时,波音与全球各大企业一样看到了巨大潜力。随着行业话题从 GenAI 迅速转向智能体 AI(Agentic AI),波音在思考如何将技术落地于实际业务。航空航天是一个高度监管且极为特殊的行业,在这里,“差不多就行”或“看似合理但实际错误”的答案是完全不可接受的。因此,波音在部署生成式 AI 时必须解决四大核心挑战: 1. **数据安全与隐私:** 保护波音 108 年来积累的领域知识和商业机密,防止敏感数据像早期某些企业那样不小心泄露至公网。 2. **严格抑制幻觉:** AI 必须输出精准无误的内容,绝不能胡编乱造。 3. **可追溯性(Traceability):** 尤其在工程设计和技术文档领域,AI 给出答案时必须能够精准链接到权威来源(Authoritative Source)。 4. **平衡创新与风险:** 一味禁止使用并非解决之道,必须在全面控险的前提下,安全地开放 AI 能力,同时提升全员的 AI 素养(AI Literacy)。 ### [05:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=358s) 打造零信任架构与安全高可靠的 AI 基础设施 针对上述挑战,波音采取了非常深思熟虑且严谨的技术和管理手段,确保全公司 17,0000 名员工能够安全合规地使用生成式 AI: ``` +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | 前端 UI / 交互层 | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | v (零信任微服务架构) +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | 身份与访问管理 (IAM) | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | v +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | 后端 API 服务 | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | v +-----------------------+ +-----------------------+ | 私有云(VPC)LLM 实例 | | RAG 检索增强与元数据 | | - 超参数调优 (Temperature)| <-------------> | - 包含作者、授权源等 | | - 约束限制禁止捏造 | | 丰富元数据 | +-----------------------+ +-----------------------+ ``` 在技术与架构实现上: * **数据安全:** 搭建了微服务零信任架构(Zero-Trust Architecture),将安全机制直接植入前端、后端和数据访问层等每一个独立组件中,并与公司现有的身份与访问管理(IAM)深度集成。 * **抑制幻觉:** 将大语言模型(LLM)部署在波音自己的私有云(VPC)内,通过超参数调优(如降低 Temperature)严苛限制模型的随意发挥,明确指令模型“若无明确依据,宁可不答,绝不捏造”。 * **增强可追溯性:** 在检索增强生成(RAG)架构中引入了更丰富的元数据(Metadata),不仅导入文档本身,还记录了文档的授权来源、作者信息等,确保生成的每一条内容都能追溯到权威源头。 在管理与推广策略上: * **发布指南:** 2023 年 7 月正向全公司发布了生成式 AI 使用指南,明确规定禁止将公司专有数据输入公开的 GenAI 网站。 * **AI 学院(GenAI Academy):** 开设免费培训课程,帮助员工提升提示词工程(Prompting)等技能,培养生成式 AI 倡导者。 * **快速推出应用:** 仅历时 12 周,波音就在 2023 年 11 月推出了首款安全的内部应用——**波音对话式 AI(Boeing Conversational AI)**。 ### [08:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=523s) 规模化推广与全公司范围的快速普及 波音在 2024 年 1 月做出了一个大胆的决定:不采取缓慢试点的“慢滚动”策略,而是直接将“波音对话式 AI”向全球 170,000 名员工全面开放。这在当时被微软(Microsoft)及多家顶尖咨询公司评估为全球最早实现如此大规模落地 GenAI 的企业之一。 为了充分释放全员的创新潜力,波音不仅提供了类似 ChatGPT 的聊天交互界面,还向内部开发者开放了安全的 API 接口。任何员工即便不懂编程,也可以直接上传文档进行实时的问答交互;而开发者则可以基于内置的 RAG 模板快速构建自己的应用,并由平台团队协助快速上线。 - 仅用 12 周时间就完成了“波音对话式 AI”的开发与上线。 - 开放仅 6 个月内便陆续扩展了文档上传问答、自定义 RAG 模板部署等高级功能。 ### [10:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=603s) 业务赋能与多场景 Copilot 落地实践 经过近 20 个月的运行,波音的生成式 AI 平台取得了极其显著的成效。目前平台拥有约 38,000 名活跃用户,分布在 53 个国家和地区。用户调查显示,生成式 AI 平均每天能为每位使用者节省 1 到 2 个小时的工作时间。此外,已有 8,000 名员工完成了 AI 学院的培训,并涌现出 2,600 名超级用户(Super Users)。借助高度复用的架构,团队构建一个新的 GenAI 专用用例所需的时间已缩短至 48 小时以内。 波音内部已经部署了 70 多款基于波音内部数据的定制化 GenAI 应用,涵盖了多个业务领域: * **工程与产品开发(Engineering & Product Development):** 过去,工程师需要从 28 个共享网盘里的约 700 万份文档中寻找设计规范和标准做法,过程极其耗时且繁琐。现在,AI 能够直接精准定位到具体文档甚至具体段落,并提供一键跳转链接,极大提升了研发效率。 * **制造与质量控制(Non-Conformance Reports / NCR):** 在飞机组装过程中,若发现质量问题需要创建不合格标签(NCR),再由质量人员审核签字。类似问题过去解决过数万次,但每次遇到都像是全新的难题。如今,生成式 AI 可以检索历史 NCR 记录,自动推荐最可能的解决方案,甚至辅助自动生成与处理 NCR。 * **财务 Copilot(Finance Copilot):** 原本以为需求不大的财务部门,因财务政策(如资产化与费用化的区分)极为复杂,推出 Copilot 后反响空前热烈。半年后已有上千人频繁使用,显著缩短了月度结账时间并减少了差错。 * **IT 服务台(IT Help Desk):** 过去员工拨打 IT 电话需等待 30 分钟,且波音需要按次向第三方服务商付费。现在,GenAI 智能聊天机器人能基于知识库文章实时解答疑难,极大降低了运维成本。 * **模型快速迭代:** “波音对话式 AI”被定位为一个开放生态。例如,在 GPT-5 发布的 6 个小时内,团队就将其成功引入至内部系统供员工使用,同时系统也支持接入 Anthropic 等其他顶尖模型。 - **活跃用户数:** 在 53 个国家/地区拥有 38,000 名日常活跃用户。 - **效率提升:** 使用者每天节省 1 至 2 小时。 - **工程知识库:** 覆盖 28 个共享网盘中的 7,000,000 份工程设计文档。 - **自定义应用:** 已在生产环境中上线 70 余款基于波音专有数据的生成式 AI 应用。 - **部署速度:** 新用例开发上线时间缩短至 48 小时以内;新模型接入(如 GPT-5)仅需 6 小时。 ### [16:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=987s) 生成式 AI 的落地价值与安全架构 生成式 AI(GenAI)在波音公司内部带来了显著的效益,不仅降低了呼叫中心的服务量与运营成本,还大幅提升了员工的满意度。阿比·塞斯(Abhi Seth)强调,他不认同外界所谓“生成式 AI 没有实际价值”或“GenAI 未能达到预期炒作”的论调。相比于过去传统机器学习(ML)所做的工作,GenAI 的演进与普及速度是前所未有的。只要企业能够以安全、负责任且可复用的架构模式去应用该技术,就能释放出巨大的商业价值。 演讲结束后,现场进入问答环节。有听众询问波音是否将 GenAI 应用于飞行安全(如飞机控制系统或飞行计划),毕竟模型存在幻觉与错误风险。发言人明确指出,**波音绝不会在飞机飞行控制系统上使用生成式 AI**,但在工厂与车间的安全风险识别及评估方面,GenAI 正在发挥重要作用。 ``` [多源数据系统] --(实时采集)--> [GenAI 风险分类模型] --(验证)--> [品质与安全团队] (结构化/非结构化输入) (14种风险类别 / 高中低分级) (系统性风险排查) ``` - **安全风险治理应用**:波音车间一线员工发现的质量与安全风险往往分散发布在十几个不同的系统中,人工逐一阅读并分析耗费极长时间。 - **自动化分类与识别**:目前波音利用 GenAI 模型实时采集并解析各系统中的员工反馈,结合波音标准化的安全流程,自动将其分类归纳到 14 种风险类别(如产品安全风险、一般隐患等),并标记低、中、高等级。 - **系统性风险洞察**:模型经过严格验证后,可直接向质量团队呈现汇总报告,将过去分散在各系统中的隐患提升为可被系统性识别与解决的改进方案,全面保障生产安全。 ### [18:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1122s) 非结构化数据治理与高精度的权限分类 对于大型企业而言,信息治理(出于诉讼、合规、记录留存与隐私要求而倾向于少留存数据)与生成式 AI(倾向于尽可能多地吸收数据)往往存在冲突。针对听众关于如何调和二者矛盾的提问,发言人解释道,波音的核心难点并不在于数据保留的多与少,而在于**数据的精细化分类**。 波音拥有大量军用飞机设计、民用飞机设计以及介于二者之间的衍生机型设计。如果在极高层级上粗暴地给这些设计与工艺文档打上安全标签,将直接导致大部分员工无法获取所需信息。例如,部分敏感数据仅限美国公民访问,而在全球化业务扩展的背景下,这种粗粒度的数据封锁会极大地阻碍协同效率。 - **AI 细粒度分类**:波音引入 AI 对文档进行更细粒度的分类,确保在向 GenAI 或其他 AI 工具输入数据时,精准控制“正确的数据提供给拥有对应权限的人”。 - **灵活的权限管控**:在满足国防出口法规(如 ITAR)和安全合规的前提下,避免将非敏感或跨项目所需的信息无差别屏蔽,从而解锁数据流动的潜力。 ### [20:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1223s) 用户规模增长、安全平台与外部工具禁令 针对波音 AI 平台的用户规模,听众提出了“虽然有 17 万用户完成入职注册,但活跃用户为 3.8 万人”的疑问。发言人回应称,在两年前如果有人预言两年内能达到 3.8 万名活跃用户,这本身就是一个极其惊人的成绩,因为这些用户的日常本职工作与 AI 完全无关。此外,波音很大一部分员工是一线生产制造工人,日常工作并不配备个人电脑,因此活跃用户主要集中在知识型员工群体中。 在平台推广初期,向员工宣贯时大家往往只是询问链接;到了 6 至 9 个月后,大量员工反馈称自己已经习惯使用该系统将原本需要 2 小时的客户回复邮件缩短至 10 分钟完成,或者用于撰写员工通知与岗位招聘说明。由于内部系统具备高度安全性,员工不仅可以输入波音内部专有信息,还能安全地处理涉密及受 ITAR 规制的敏感数据。 - **趣味数据**:在 3.8 万名活跃用户之外,每周六日约有 2,000 名员工会在周末登录并使用该系统。 - **外部 GPT 全面封锁**:为了防止敏感数据泄露,在内部生成式 AI 平台成熟并具备弹性扩容能力后,波音彻底切断了所有外部通用 GPT 及第三方 GenAI 工具的访问权限。如果员工出于工作需要使用 AI,必须统一使用波音内部平台。 - **6 小时快速集成**:为了防止员工因内部工具跟不上技术前沿而产生抵触,波音承诺在新的外部大语言模型(LLM)发布后,仅需 6 小时即可将其安全接入内部对话式 AI 平台。 ### [23:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1388s) 计算机视觉消除几十年老系统的制造痛点 在制造与供应链侧,听众询问了 AI 的具体应用实践。发言人分享了一个在工厂“质量停顿”(Quality Stand-down)活动中收集到的典型案例:波音有一个运行了几十年的图纸系统,存储着历代飞机的数千万张工程图纸。由于图纸年代久远,装配线上的机械师在组装飞机时常常面临图纸某些区域过于淡化、无法看清的问题。 过去解决这一问题的流程极其繁琐且昂贵:机械师提报图纸看不清 $\rightarrow$ 将图纸发给施乐(Xerox)公司 $\rightarrow$ 施乐对整张图纸做加深处理 $\rightarrow$ 重新扫描并上传系统。这种方式不仅耗费大量时间和资金,而且每次只能修复一张,对于数以百万计的图纸库而言效率极低。 ``` [老旧工程图纸] --(字迹模糊)--> [传统流程: 送施乐加深并重新扫描] (耗时费钱) \ -> [智能解决方案: 嵌入 CV 一键局部加深] (日用 2.5万次) ``` - **视觉 AI 算法开发**:团队首先开发了一个计算机视觉(CV)应用,能够自动扫描上千张图纸,精准识别出哪些区域字迹淡化并进行针对性加深。 - **无缝嵌入老旧系统**:为了不让员工在多个软件间来回切换,波音直接将该 CV 能力嵌入到了那套使用了几十年的图纸系统中。 - **生产效率极大提升**:机械师只需在看图界面点击一个按钮,系统就会瞬间将模糊图纸转化为清晰可读的状态。目前该功能在波音内部每天被使用高达 **25,000 次**,有力地支撑了飞机的产能爬坡。 ### [25:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1512s) RAG 架构快速构建与人类专家验证 针对“波音如何在 48 小时内快速构建并部署一个新的生成式 RAG 架构”这一数据点,听众提出了关于评估与验证(Evals & Validation)挑战的疑问。发言人强调,在工业企业中应用 AI 的本质并不是为了“做 AI 自身”,而是为了推动变更管理、解决实际问题并造福飞机制造——“波音的本职工作是造飞机,而不是开发 AI,重点在于如何利用 AI 打造更快、更安全、更好的航空航天产品。” 虽然构建 RAG 只需要 48 小时,但后续需要与业务领域专家(SME)共同投入 2 到 3 周时间进行高精度的问答验证。团队会生成大量的测试问题与答案交由业务专家审核,专家标记正确与否并提出改进建议,团队再据此进行微调与迭代,直到准确率达到上线标准。 - **信任建立与变更管理**:如果 AI 系统给出一次错误答案,用户就会失去信任且不再使用,因此严格的专家验证是建立用户信任的关键。 - **气隙隔离(Air-Gapped)网络与大模型升级**: - **涉密网络规划**:目前该套对话平台尚未部署到完全物理隔离(Air-Gapped)的涉密网络中。针对涉密区域,波音正在探索基于本地硬件基础设施部署本土化 LLM 的方案。 - **解耦的 RAG 架构**:波音并没有自己训练大语言模型,而是将重点放在对话接入层与安全 RAG 架构的建设上。所有的安全控制与数据检索逻辑都保存在 RAG 侧,大模型本身只是作为替换组件。当模型从 GPT-4/GPT-4.5 升级到 GPT-5 时,底层向量数据库(Vector DB)和 RAG 架构保持不变,仅需替换新模型即可无缝获得更流畅、更准确的语言表达能力。 ## Notable quotes > [02:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=144s) 差不多就行”或“看似合理但实际错误”的答案是完全不可接受的。 — Abhi Seth > [05:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=358s) 若无明确依据,宁可不答,绝不捏造 — Abhi Seth > [16:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=987s) 波音绝不会在飞机飞行控制系统上使用生成式 AI — Abhi Seth > [18:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1122s) 正确的数据提供给拥有对应权限的人 — Abhi Seth > [25:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs&t=1512s) 波音的本职工作是造飞机,而不是开发 AI,重点在于如何利用 AI 打造更快、更安全、更好的航空航天产品。 — Abhi Seth ## Mentioned Abhi Seth, 波音 (Boeing), Ai4, 商用飞机 (Commercial Airplanes), 国防、空间与安全 (Defense, Space & Security), 全球服务 (Global Services), F-47, Boeing Model 1 / B&W Seaplane, 波音对话式 AI (Boeing Conversational AI), 微软 (Microsoft), AI 学院 (GenAI Academy), GPT-4, GPT-4.5, GPT-5, Anthropic, 施乐 (Xerox), ChatGPT, ITAR ## Video description Abhi Seth, Chief Enterprise AI & Data Officer, Boeing [Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5tSNcKaSs)

Source quotes

[2:24] Abhi Seth: 差不多就行”或“看似合理但实际错误”的答案是完全不可接受的。 [5:58] Abhi Seth: 若无明确依据,宁可不答,绝不捏造 [16:27] Abhi Seth: 波音绝不会在飞机飞行控制系统上使用生成式 AI [18:42] Abhi Seth: 正确的数据提供给拥有对应权限的人 [25:12] Abhi Seth: 波音的本职工作是造飞机,而不是开发 AI,重点在于如何利用 AI 打造更快、更安全、更好的航空航天产品。

Source quotes

[0:04] Abhi Seth: Every 2 seconds, a Boeing commercial aircraft takes off or lands somewhere across the globe. [0:58] In July 2023, Boeing published and deployed enterprise-wide Generative AI usage guidelines to 170,000 employees. [0:58] In November 2023, Boeing built and launched "Boeing Conversational AI" in 12 weeks, scaling it to all 170,000 employees by January 2024. [10:03] Active daily footprint: 38,000 users spanning 53 countries, saving 1–2 hours per user daily. [10:03] Rapid prototyping: New custom enterprise GenAI use cases deploy from concept to functional build in under 48 hours. [12:06] When OpenAI released GPT-5, Boeing integrated the model into Boeing Conversational AI within 6 hours. [12:06] Over 70 custom, domain-specific GenAI applications leveraging internal Boeing data are currently deployed across the business. [17:13] Abhi Seth: No Generative AI is used directly on plane control or flight safety systems. [17:13] Automated sorting across 14 distinct risk categories and severity levels (low, medium, high). [20:23] Access to external LLMs was blocked in favor of the internal secure portal. [23:08] The automated drawing enhancement button is used 25,000 times per day by factory mechanics.

Original transcript

[0:04] Good, good afternoon everybody. Um, [0:06] looks like my mic is working so we are [0:08] set to to talk. I think it's my [0:09] privilege here. Um, honestly, thank you [0:12] for taking time and joining this [0:13] session. It's my privilege to represent [0:14] the Boeing company, a name that has been [0:17] defining the future of aviation for the [0:21] last 108 years. um all the way from [0:25] spacecraft to you know defense systems [0:28] of course and commercial airspace that [0:29] you are all very very familiar with. [0:31] Today I'll be talking about you know the [0:33] journey we have taken in the last couple [0:35] years um in generative AI. [0:39] Um first let me give you a brief [0:40] overview of u of Boeing. You know the [0:43] whole idea about Boeing our mission is [0:44] really connecting protecting um and [0:47] exploring the world and doing it in a [0:49] way so that we can make our planet a [0:51] sustainable place uh to live. You know [0:54] we have three key businesses commercial [0:56] airplanes which is really takes people [0:58] you know across the planet from one [1:00] place to another shortens connectivity [1:02] uh for folks. Uh our first plane uh the [1:06] Boeing SE plane flew in 1916 and we've [1:08] been redefining you know the aviation [1:10] future ever since. We have uh defense [1:13] and space and security which is really [1:15] all about protecting our country um and [1:17] providing deterrence. Um [1:20] really excited and honored to be [1:22] building the F-47 uh the most advanced [1:24] fighter jet ever made uh which is the [1:27] sixth generation fighter jet. So there [1:28] is uh a lot of activity happening in [1:30] that space. Really excited about that. [1:32] And then the last business I really want [1:34] to talk about is the global services. [1:35] And this is all about being service [1:37] champions, going out in the market, [1:39] helping our customers solve problems, [1:41] making sure the planes we are providing [1:43] uh continue to fly safely um and [1:46] minimizing the downtime for our [1:47] customers both on the airline side um as [1:50] well as the defense side. Boeing is a [1:53] company that has been investing in AI [1:55] for several decades. Um some fun facts [1:58] about Boeing. If you think about it, [1:59] every two seconds a Boeing jet, you [2:01] know, um takes off or lands um on the [2:05] planet and we have basically flown [2:07] around half the global population um put [2:10] them on an airplane. In terms of AI, I [2:13] think uh we have been doing physics [2:15] based modeling, VR, um simulation, you [2:18] know, for many decades and investment in [2:20] AI and ML has been going on for the last [2:22] couple decades. when generative AI [2:24] really came came along in 2022 2023 time [2:28] frame we saw a huge opportunity like [2:30] everybody else to go tap in the [2:32] potential right I think we are reading [2:33] about articles um that hey is genetive [2:36] AI is living to the hype everybody has [2:38] already moved on to agentic AI as a [2:41] conversation this year right how are we [2:44] doing right and I think I just want to [2:45] make this more of a conversational [2:47] um chat um and leave more time for the [2:50] end hopefully for questions and we have [2:52] taken this approach coach on how can we [2:54] you know it's not really just about [2:55] technology you know we have done a lot [2:57] of work in responsible AI in the last [2:59] couple years and how do we really make [3:00] sure we are intentional about using it [3:03] where do we use it um and then how do we [3:06] drive responsibility of uh you know and [3:09] ethical and bias and transparency and [3:11] robustness in our models no matter where [3:13] we are using it we have around 170,000 [3:16] employees in 65 countries so governing [3:18] AI um and 62,000 of them is are [3:21] engineers right So um you can imagine [3:25] it's a lot of work uh to govern AI [3:28] practices [3:29] thinking about um how do we approach [3:32] right I think aerospace is an [3:34] interesting industry right um when you [3:38] think about approaching AI and [3:39] especially generative AI you know a good [3:41] enough answer in aerospace is really not [3:44] an acceptable answer right we we are a [3:46] very highly regulated industry we have [3:48] to make sure any answer that AI is [3:50] providing is accurate Right, we need to [3:53] make sure there is traceability to [3:55] swords. You know, the first thing we [3:56] really thought about like as we wanted [3:58] to go about doing gen AI, it's really [4:00] not about um AI as a technology and as [4:03] it keeps on evolving is like what do you [4:04] do with it to solve the problems you [4:06] have at hand within the company. Um one [4:10] of the first things we really wanted to [4:11] make sure that we have 18 years of uh [4:13] domain knowledge and a lot of Boeing [4:15] proprietary information. How do we keep [4:16] our data safe? Right? We saw a lot of [4:18] news articles around accidentally [4:21] proprietary company data getting leaked [4:23] when people were using genai [4:24] applications early on. How do we make [4:27] sure our data is secure? How do we limit [4:29] hallucinations? Right? I think a good [4:32] enough answer or an incorrect answer [4:33] that sounds about right isn't something [4:36] we can actually do. Um traceability, how [4:39] do we really we always talk about [4:40] authoritative source, right? especially [4:42] when you get into engineering design you [4:45] know any technical documentation our [4:47] processes there is a lot of robust [4:49] control um because of the industry we [4:51] operate in so if we are going to apply [4:54] generative AI uh we have to make sure we [4:56] are able to link to authorized source of [4:59] information uh for people and then the [5:02] last one really is really balancing [5:04] innovation and risk right so don't use [5:05] it is not a good enough answer because [5:08] everybody's going to use it so how do [5:09] you really use it in a safe secure way [5:12] So you're not throttling innovation [5:14] while you manage you know the risk of [5:16] using these capability and for all of [5:18] that I think you know what it all h you [5:20] know relies on is elevating our employee [5:22] AI literacy right so how do you elevate [5:24] the AI literacy around genai emerging [5:26] capabilities like genai gentic AI all [5:29] the you know we we just heard [5:31] um open AI open source some models there [5:34] is all kinds of open source models out [5:35] there how do we make sure people are [5:37] using it um the right way right so we [5:39] took this um [5:42] approach and these challenges in mind [5:44] and thought about it very deliberately [5:46] and how do we enable access to all of [5:48] our 170 170,000 employees across 63 65 [5:52] countries um with genai um we created [5:58] and I I'll just answer a few questions [5:59] around I'm sure a lot of you have [6:01] questions around how did we do that um [6:03] so securing our data we created a [6:04] microservices zerorust architecture um [6:07] so that we can actually don't put [6:09] security around the components but [6:11] within each component all the way from [6:13] the front end, back end and the data [6:15] access component layer um as as well as [6:19] really integration of that microservices [6:21] architecture with our um identity and [6:24] access management capabilities that we [6:26] have, right? So that when you know as as [6:28] any of the global employees are trying [6:30] to go find something or access or put [6:33] Boeing data in, we are securing it at [6:36] all um at all levels within within our [6:39] application architecture limiting [6:41] hallucinations. A lot of the work really [6:43] is done in that case is bringing um LLMs [6:47] within our own VPC as we secure the data [6:49] from going out and really fine-tuning [6:52] LLM so that um we do some hyperparameter [6:56] tuning you know limiting the temperature [6:57] of the model so that we can actually ask [6:59] it to say hey do not answer the question [7:01] do not make up an answer only provide [7:03] the answer if based on the information [7:05] that is actually provided to you. uh [7:08] traceability. This has kind of been um a [7:10] little bit of a longer journey and it's [7:13] really about adding more metadata to the [7:16] knowledge that we are inserting into our [7:19] um retrieval augmented uh generation [7:21] capabilities right our rag architecture [7:23] we were able to not just ingest the [7:25] documents but also metadata around the [7:27] documents which sources are we bringing [7:28] it in what is the is it an authorized [7:31] source who is the author etc etc um so [7:35] those are kind of things we we had to do [7:37] and very quickly. Um, so we talked about [7:40] it in July. You know, one of the first [7:42] things we did was really create Genai [7:45] guidelines and then launch those [7:46] generative AI guidelines across the [7:48] across the company to 170,000 users. As [7:51] you go use Genai, here are the things [7:52] you really need to consider. Please do [7:54] not put any company proprietary [7:56] information on public Genai websites for [7:59] example, right? And what to do, what not [8:01] to do, right? I think we opened a geni [8:03] academy and which is basically a course [8:05] where we said hey you know come be a [8:07] geni advocate um this is a simple course [8:11] where people can enroll for free um and [8:14] up their geni um literacy right so how [8:17] can you do effective prompting how to [8:19] use it what can it do for you um so a [8:23] lot of that and then I talked about the [8:24] zero trust architecture as we created [8:26] this capability called Boeing [8:28] conversational AI that we launched right [8:30] so we launched Boeing conversational AI [8:31] in November of 2023 [8:33] very quickly in around 12 weeks [8:37] and we were able to actually you know [8:39] this was Boeing's first secure genai [8:41] application and in January of 24 we [8:43] scaled it to 170,000 employees and we [8:46] were wondering it's like should we do [8:47] that right and I think we talked to [8:49] Microsoft we talked to you know some [8:50] other consulting companies who actually [8:52] have exposure across uh across industry [8:55] and they were mentioning Boeing is one [8:57] of the first such large scale genai [8:59] application [9:01] uh to be scaled back in 2024 January um [9:06] which was been an interesting thing. We [9:07] thought about should we slow roll it or [9:10] or open it to everybody and we decided [9:11] to just open it to everybody and it [9:13] scaled really really well. Um we asked [9:16] people to come take geni training and [9:19] get access to the conversational AI app. [9:21] We provided developers API access. So [9:24] all of that you know if you want to be a [9:26] you know if you want to use a ji [9:28] capability as a chat GPT chatbot right [9:30] you can use that but if you want to [9:32] build your own applications you know you [9:33] can use the secure API [9:36] um we then enabled capabilities over [9:38] time in the next six months around you [9:40] can upload your documents so anybody you [9:42] know you need to know you know how to [9:43] code you don't know how to code you can [9:45] upload document you can do Q&A with the [9:47] document real time and if you build your [9:49] rag template you can bring it in and we [9:51] can actually help you productionize that [9:53] rack template. very quickly. [9:55] So really reusable patterns on how can [9:58] we scale Gen AI, right? Um where are we [10:03] today? And this is kind of my last [10:04] slide. If you think about it, you know, [10:06] we have Genai applications that has been [10:08] used for [10:11] now 18 or I would say a little bit more [10:14] than close to 20 months, right? We got [10:16] 38,000 active users across 53 countries [10:20] um that use it daily. [10:22] And we did a survey of our users is like [10:24] what how are you using it? We are [10:26] constantly thinking about like how do [10:28] you use it? What value do you get out of [10:29] it? We get you know videos out to [10:32] educate the rest of the rest of the [10:34] group. Um and what we are finding out is [10:37] basically they're we the teammates are [10:40] saving around one to two hours per day [10:42] um for each member right we've got 8,000 [10:45] people trained in our um genai academy [10:49] and 2600 super users um who are [10:52] basically building applications on our [10:54] genai platform globally [10:58] with the reusable pattern work that we [11:00] have done um if now there is a new [11:02] unique genai use case that we have to [11:04] actually go build we are able to build [11:05] that use case in less than 48 hours. So [11:07] a lot of the focus is really I think [11:09] speed at which you can roll some of this [11:10] capability out and scale it out quickly. [11:13] So for example we have a finance team or [11:16] we may have an HR team or we may have a [11:18] supply chain team who may come and say [11:19] hey we got 800 procedures and it takes a [11:23] long time for our teammates to go out [11:25] and read through the those procedures to [11:27] make sure to do their job they're [11:29] compliant or what's the right way to do [11:30] to do the job. A lot of times some of [11:33] these are you know being being an old [11:36] company and a highly regulated company [11:37] right I think people have their own [11:39] personal notes on how to do the job well [11:41] right and I think it's it's not scalable [11:44] um and as we onboard new people you know [11:47] nobody wants to go read hundreds of [11:49] pages and and learn how to do the job [11:51] right and I think so these kind of [11:52] capabilities as we build these co-pilots [11:55] we are able to actually zero the [11:56] hallucination we are going to be able to [11:58] test these things and then deploy these [12:00] co-pilots for program management for [12:03] supply chain. Um a lot of work we have [12:06] done is really engineering right we [12:08] talked about 62,000 engineers right uh [12:11] one of the things I wanted to talk about [12:12] is um [12:15] our product development teams we have [12:18] around 7 million documents in 28 or [12:22] what's 28 share drives that were [12:25] existing that people have to go find to [12:27] figure out how do we you know do a [12:29] design procedure because there is a lot [12:31] of um knowledge that has been created [12:33] over decades that's documented which is [12:35] Boeing standard engineering practices or [12:38] design practices and it's not it's kind [12:41] of unwieldy for people to go find that [12:43] information. It took them days to go [12:45] find it. Um and we were able to now [12:47] unlock that capability with a lot more [12:50] structure and traceability. So you can [12:52] ask a question, it'll give you the [12:54] answer. It'll also give you the source [12:55] and you click a button, it'll actually [12:57] take you to the source to that document [12:59] um and that paragraph. So you can [13:01] actually go read that, right? you don't [13:03] have to go find and mine that [13:04] information in so many different places [13:06] and some of that has been very very [13:09] wellreceived. Um we have you know [13:12] several around 70 plus genai apps that [13:14] are custom apps using Boeing data that [13:16] are deployed. So the Boeing [13:18] conversational AI think about it as a [13:20] ecosystem right so it's really a general [13:22] chat GPT now GPT5 was released last week [13:25] in 6 hours we were able to bring that in [13:27] uh into Boeing conversational AI so you [13:29] have access to it we want to bring in [13:31] anthropic model so it's kind of a secure [13:33] interface to use all kinds of LLM [13:36] interaction right and then you are also [13:38] able to use the API access to do your [13:40] personal development and um use the [13:44] build your own rag to actually once you [13:46] build a build your own rag grid then we [13:48] have a pattern in which you can actually [13:49] put it to production using our security [13:51] and compliance practices and um in one [13:54] or two days. So we have 70 plus apps [13:56] that are running and a lot of the work [13:58] we have seen is really productivity [14:00] coming out of uh you know several [14:02] different knowledge worker areas. uh a [14:04] lot of it is in engineering like for [14:06] design practices for regulatory [14:08] information [14:10] um a lot of information around for our [14:12] mechanics for example you know I think [14:14] as you are trying to go assemble a plane [14:16] um you need to know like hey what is [14:19] what is the information so we call it [14:21] non-conformance for example if you find [14:23] an issue if it's non-conforming you have [14:24] to create a non-conformance tag um in [14:27] aerospace [14:29] and then you some quality person is [14:30] going to check your non-conformance tag [14:32] and actually qualify buy it and sign it [14:34] off and then you need to go address the [14:36] non-conformance before you can the move [14:38] the plane forward right you have to fix [14:40] the quality issue now those issues [14:42] happen thousands and we have resolved [14:45] thousands but every time we look at it [14:47] like it's a new one right so we are able [14:49] to now use genai to search through [14:51] thousands of old NCRs is like hey this [14:54] is the problem here is how we have [14:55] solved it here is a most likely solution [14:58] how can we actually automatically use [15:00] jai to create an NCR and resolve an NCR [15:03] So those are examples that are kind of [15:04] helping our mechanics, our engineers, [15:06] our supply chain professionals. You [15:08] know, finance co-pilot is an interesting [15:10] one. Um we didn't think there was much [15:12] of a need. But people said, "Hey, [15:15] finance policies are complex, right? We [15:17] need to figure out what can we [15:18] capitalize, what can we expense, right? [15:20] As we planned for the next year, and [15:22] some of you are from finance, so you can [15:23] understand. I see some smiles in the [15:26] room. Uh it's it's not easy." and and we [15:29] were able to actually create this [15:31] co-pilot and then you know get some [15:33] validation and launch it and then we [15:35] forgot about it. Um just okay it's done [15:38] and then 6 months later we go back and [15:40] it has got probably one of the most [15:41] hits. It's like thousand people using [15:43] finance copilot really. Uh and then we [15:46] find out that finance community is super [15:47] active and they were able to now get the [15:49] responses back in real time. The month [15:51] closing is faster. It's with a lot less [15:53] errors. It's been an interesting journey [15:55] for for that one. And I think the IT [15:58] help desk is the last one um that I want [16:00] to highlight which is really I think you [16:02] know when there is a IT problem all of [16:04] us have IT help desk where we phone call [16:06] and there is a 30-minute wait time and [16:08] every time somebody calls we have to [16:10] actually go [16:12] um you know pay a third party company x [16:15] amount of dollars to go for each call. [16:17] How do we you know to get it resolved? [16:19] Now we have a chatbot that takes care of [16:21] it um and gives you answers real time. [16:24] If there is a knowledge article, it'll [16:25] help you uh why something is not [16:27] working. And our call volume has got [16:29] dropped. Our cost has come down and our [16:31] employee satisfaction has kind of gone [16:33] up. Um [16:36] so lots of value from genai. I really do [16:39] not want people publishing geni does not [16:41] have value kind of papers or has geni [16:44] lived up to the hype. I feel like it is. [16:47] Yes, traditional ML has done a lot of [16:49] good work for us, but Genai has come at [16:51] a speed, you know, we all know it's [16:53] unprecedented and if we can apply it in [16:55] a secure way um in a reusable pattern, [17:00] you know, architecture which is secured [17:01] and responsible, I think a ton of value [17:04] can come out of JAI. So with that, thank [17:08] you um for listening and I'll open it up [17:11] for any questions. [17:13] Is J AI used in flight safety related [17:18] for example the plan or the control [17:21] system of the plan because we all know J [17:23] AI may have error and that's what we all [17:27] concerned about. We do not use Nai on [17:30] the plane but we have used Gen AI in [17:34] understanding our safety risk right I [17:36] think on the shop floor and that's kind [17:38] of where if you think about uh an [17:40] interesting example that we are kind of [17:42] working on we have for example quality [17:45] risk or safety risk that our teammates [17:47] are identifying they are publishing it [17:49] into so many different systems right um [17:52] it's hard for somebody to go and read [17:54] each one of these things and then come [17:56] back with an answer to understand okay [17:58] how do we to resolve it. Now we are [17:59] using a genai model to ingest human [18:01] input from so many different systems in [18:03] real time and Boeing has a very [18:05] structured process like 14 different [18:07] categories of risk that we have to go [18:09] categorize what kinds of risk is it a [18:11] product safety risk is it you know [18:13] hazard is it something and then what is [18:15] the classification of risk like low [18:17] medium high right so ji is able to now [18:20] classify all of that and then bring that [18:23] in and we have validated the model right [18:25] and I think it's now able to present [18:27] that to the quality team. So now instead [18:29] of having somebody go into so many [18:30] systems and read manually, we are able [18:33] to understand systemic risk that kind of [18:35] exists um and it can it can boil that up [18:39] so we can be a safer company. [18:42] We help very large organizations uh [18:46] manage all of their unstructured data to [18:48] drive geni. The biggest conflict of [18:51] interest that they've experienced is [18:54] that one side is information governance [18:57] which requires support for litigation, [19:00] compliance, records keeping, privacy [19:04] and that's in conflict with Genai which [19:07] likes to keep more data versus [19:09] governance which likes to keep less [19:11] data. Uh obviously the risk is viewed [19:14] differently from both sides. How do you [19:16] reconcile these conflicts? [19:19] the the view we have taken is I think [19:21] applying genai is really I think [19:24] we don't really we are not thinking [19:26] about honestly less data we are thinking [19:28] about our challenge is data [19:29] classification right I think we have a [19:32] lot of as I said defense designs and we [19:35] have a lot of commercial designs and [19:36] then we have a lot of designs that kind [19:38] of blend across defense and commercial [19:39] because they are derivative designs of [19:41] airplanes right and if we actually mark [19:45] the procedures and design uh documents [19:47] at a very high level then you know we [19:51] can't really unlock that to a lot of the [19:52] population at Boeing right we talk about [19:55] only US people can actually access it [19:57] for example and as we grow globally [19:58] that's a challenge or we need to really [20:00] limit that information to certain you [20:03] know citizen types for example so we are [20:05] using AI to more do that data [20:07] classification at a granular level so [20:09] when we are applying and ingesting it [20:11] into Gen AI or other AI capabilities we [20:14] can actually make sure the right [20:15] information goes to the right person [20:17] right and it's not unne unnecessarily [20:18] blocking it. [20:21] >> Thank you for the question. [20:23] >> Yeah, I had a quick question regarding [20:25] this graphic that you have here. Uh I [20:27] noticed that you listed that you have [20:28] 170,000 users on boarded. Um but it [20:31] seems like 38,000 active users. Uh, I [20:34] was curious like what in your time at [20:36] Boeing do you think led tound and I [20:40] guess 30 132,000 users that either like [20:44] uh well I don't know like what are your [20:46] thoughts? [20:48] >> To me I don't think two years ago if [20:50] somebody said in 2 years we'll have [20:52] 38,000 active users we'll get here. Uh [20:54] okay that's a lot of people using it [20:56] right I think and these are people who [20:58] are not who just hear about AI they are [21:00] not really their job is not AI um the [21:04] other thing I would say is really not [21:05] every Boeing employee has a computer uh [21:08] personal computer because a lot of our [21:09] workforce is really building airplanes [21:11] and not using jai right so think about [21:14] it from that perspective so a lot of our [21:16] knowledge workers are definitely using [21:17] it we see interestingly the fun [21:20] statistic that is not listed here is [21:21] 2,000 people are using it on the weekend [21:23] Um so that was that was more interesting [21:26] to me than the 38,000 but you know the [21:28] population keeps on growing is kind of [21:30] the thinking right and if you go in the [21:33] first year of launching and you go give [21:35] a talk like that within Boeing and say [21:37] hey we have built this please use it [21:39] people will be like oh interesting can [21:41] you give me the link right and and then [21:43] 6 months nine months later when you go [21:45] and give a talk like that they're like [21:46] oh I've been using it and I'm responding [21:48] to my customer emails it took me two [21:50] hours now I can do it in 10 minutes or [21:52] I'm using it for you know writing [21:55] employee communication or writing job [21:57] description right I think and all of [21:58] that can happen in a very secure way [22:00] right we have built this application [22:02] with security so you can not just put [22:05] brewing proprietary information but also [22:07] put ITAR information right which is um [22:09] something which is uh which is you know [22:11] more of a challenge [22:14] okay [22:14] >> so uh sorry I have a question following [22:16] up on your last point of security from a [22:19] I guess cyber security standpoint is [22:20] there concerns or pain points um you [22:22] currently are dealing with or dealt with [22:25] along the way up to now. [22:26] >> I think one of our concerns has been [22:28] even after we released the guidelines is [22:30] how many people are using external geni [22:32] capability, right? I think uh and that [22:34] continue to happen. So once we had this [22:37] capability mature and scalable, we ended [22:39] up shutting down access to all the [22:41] external GPTs and geni capabilities. If [22:44] you want to use it for work, this is the [22:46] place. And we want to make sure this is [22:48] you know that's the reason why the [22:49] six-hour availability because as soon as [22:51] you shut everything down people are [22:52] saying hey this is not good enough I'm [22:54] using this LLM that is better right so [22:56] you want to make sure the latest [22:57] technology is available and it doesn't [22:59] take 6 months to get after release right [23:02] now it takes six hours to get after [23:04] release into into conversational AI [23:07] >> uh from building the airplane [23:08] perspective in a manufacturing supply [23:11] chain um side of it what are some of the [23:14] challenges maybe you can share um or [23:16] things that you think that have been [23:18] done by AI. Uh it could be Gen AI or [23:21] other AI platforms. [23:22] >> I'll give you a fun example. Um so we [23:26] did a lot of quality standowns last year [23:28] um with our our mechanic population [23:31] who's building the airplane and we said [23:32] hey tell us about some of the bigger [23:34] challenges you have and we have these [23:36] you know the drawing system for Boeing [23:38] right. uh there is one drawing system um [23:41] which has several tens of millions of [23:43] drawings over so many generations of [23:45] airplanes. It's an old system. A lot of [23:48] our drawings as they are trying to [23:49] assemble the plane, they're not able to [23:51] read properly because they were kind of [23:54] faint in certain regions. Okay. Now what [23:57] were we doing? We would actually [23:58] somebody say hey I can't read this [23:59] drawing and I'm putting in plane [24:01] together. We will go and take the [24:02] drawing send it to Xerox. They will [24:04] darken the whole drawing and then we'll [24:06] bring it in. we'll scan it and we'll [24:08] upload it. And you can imagine the time [24:10] and money it costs to do that and you [24:12] you fixed one drawing and then somebody [24:14] else comes with another drawing, right? [24:16] And we got millions of them. So as we [24:18] heard it and it it is a blocker, right? [24:21] So we ended up thinking about building a [24:23] computer vision application outside and [24:26] then we tested it and it's now able to [24:28] actually figure out out of thousands of [24:30] drawings if you input it can go through [24:32] the whole set figure out which ones and [24:34] which areas are faint and it can [24:36] automatically darken it. Great. But it [24:38] doesn't really help if you have a [24:40] separate application, right? So we ended [24:42] up embedding that capability into our [24:44] drawing application which was decades [24:46] old. And now when a mechanic is actually [24:48] looking at it, if they can't read it, [24:50] they push a button and it'll actually um [24:53] make the drawing readable, right? Um so [24:56] that's a huge help, right? It's a small [24:58] I would say it's a in innovative [25:00] application, not something you would [25:02] kind of think of if you don't have the [25:03] problem, but it's used 25,000 times a [25:06] day today. So that's helping right as we [25:09] grow the build rate. [25:12] >> Hey, thanks for sharing these insights. [25:14] And I had a question on the 48 hours [25:16] build and deploy um new geni racks right [25:20] it's an interesting data point uh [25:22] building is easy but um evals and [25:26] validation in my experience has been the [25:28] biggest challenge can you talk something [25:30] about how you were able to um expedite [25:32] that make it rapid and deploy it [25:34] >> so a lot of on the genai side I think [25:37] you know you're absolutely right [25:38] validation is val without validation you [25:41] can't really go too far because you The [25:44] whole if you think about what is AI [25:46] right I think the whole idea about doing [25:48] AI in an industrial company is not to do [25:50] AI it's about driving change management [25:52] solving problems and making sure that we [25:53] are able to build planes our job is to [25:55] build planes not to do AI how can AI [25:58] help build faster safer better aerospace [26:00] right um so validation is really [26:03] important a lot of the work we have done [26:04] in Gen AI is really um you know you you [26:07] build a rag in 48 hours and then we [26:09] spend two three weeks withmemes on doing [26:12] a whole bunch of question an answer, [26:14] right? So, we will actually produce [26:15] questions. They will give us questions. [26:17] We'll produce answers. We'll give it to [26:18] them. They will validate those answers [26:21] and questions and say, are they correct [26:22] or do they need to change and we'll [26:24] bring them in and fine-tune the model [26:25] and run that again and then we'll give [26:27] it to them. So, we have an iterative [26:29] approach to actually re uh improving the [26:33] accuracy of the model and once they once [26:35] they approve it, then we go uh to [26:38] production because it's really all about [26:39] change management and trust building. If [26:41] the if this is giving you the wrong [26:43] answer or any AI is giving you the wrong [26:45] answer, people lose trust and they they [26:46] don't come back and use that, right? So [26:50] that's kind of how we think about it. [26:52] Hello. Were you able to deploy this for [26:56] both the unclassified network as well as [26:59] possibly airgapped classified network [27:01] where Boeing employees are? And if not, [27:04] are do you have any plans to take this [27:06] deployment into these airgapped areas? [27:09] we haven't deployed it into air gaped [27:11] areas. Um so there we are really looking [27:14] more I would say you know local uh [27:18] infrastructure and local LLMs right I [27:20] think the air gap space is a totally [27:22] different space it's a whole new ball [27:24] game yes they those employees have [27:26] access to this but they can't really use [27:28] the problems that they are solving in [27:30] air gap on year right I think they have [27:33] to be very again training comes into [27:35] play [27:36] >> thank you great speech today my name is [27:38] Michael um you mentioned that you are [27:42] constantly developing new models and [27:45] trying to implement them. What is the [27:46] process like of u you already taught [27:50] your past models? How do you transfer [27:53] that knowledge that you taught them the [27:55] first model to the next one? Um how much [27:58] time, energy, everything? How do you [28:00] make it efficient? [28:01] >> So sorry I I would like to just correct [28:03] what I said earlier. We are not building [28:05] LLMs. We are just getting as the new LLM [28:07] gets released we are able to bring it [28:09] into the interface into the [28:10] conversational AI secured interface and [28:13] have make it accessible to the [28:15] employees. Now to your question as you [28:17] build 70 of these applications you know [28:20] we we are basically they will keep [28:23] running for example on GPD45 as we get [28:26] GPD5 you know I think the team is going [28:27] to go and update that uh but it's really [28:30] a simple rag architecture and a lot of [28:32] the security is really built into the [28:33] rack side versus the LLM side. So as the [28:36] LLM gets better with the same vector [28:38] database and the lag, you know, rag [28:40] infrastructure, it's able to actually [28:42] pick the answers and be more eloquent.