AFT Partners With Microsoft, OpenAI on $23 Million Teacher AI Program
Ai4
The largest US teachers union is partnering directly with tech giants to establish classroom guardrails and upskill 400,000 educators amid a total absence of federal AI regulation.
## Background
This content was published on YouTube by the channel Ai4 on August 24, 2025. According to the page description, it features a fireside chat between Randi Weingarten, President of the American Federation of Teachers, and Jason Abbruzzese of NBC News. The discussion covers the impact of artificial intelligence on public education, ethics, workforce transformation, and the AFT's initiative to upskill over 400,000 teachers.
## TL;DR
AFT President Randi Weingarten outlines organized labor's proactive response to generative AI in public education following the release of ChatGPT. Rather than resisting the technology, the union partnered with tech giants like Microsoft, OpenAI, and Anthropic to launch a $23 million AI National Institute focused on teacher training and classroom safeguards. While educators leverage AI for administrative tasks and special education support, major concerns remain around data privacy, student mental health, and the erosion of critical thinking skills. Weingarten stresses the need for strict state-level safeguards, data protection agreements, and maintaining the vital human element in teaching.
## Atmosphere & style
The session carries an urgent, pragmatic, and candid tone as Weingarten blends self-deprecating humor with passionate labor advocacy. The dynamic between her and Abbruzzese feels like an engaging, high-stakes policy conversation rather than a rehearsed presentation. Weingarten moves fluidly from lighthearted personal anecdotes about technology to sharp critiques of tech
## Key takeaways
- [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=4s) Randi Weingarten initially reacted to ChatGPT's release with shock, realizing generative AI would fundamentally change public education on a scale similar to the printing press.
- [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=4s) In the absence of federal guardrails, the AFT launched an AI National Institute supported by a $23 million partnership with Microsoft, OpenAI, and Anthropic.
- [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=4s) The AFT actively fought to prevent a 10-year federal preemption clause in tech legislation so state and local communities retain regulatory power over AI.
- [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=4s) A breakthrough symposium in Chicago brought teachers and Microsoft developers together to give practical classroom feedback and build trust between educators and tech creators.
- [00:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=8s) Teachers are far more concerned about data privacy, deepfakes, student safety, and the erosion of critical thinking than traditional essay plagiarism.
- [00:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=8s) Weingarten argues AI cannot replace human teachers due to the essential emotional and relational dynamics required to educate children.
- [00:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=8s) Teachers are using AI productively for routine paperwork, lesson planning, and assisting special education students with real-time reading support for IEPs.
- [00:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=13s) Weingarten warns against AI companion chatbots targeted at minors and calls for urgent government limits to protect youth mental health.
- [00:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=13s) While politicians urge schools to adopt AI, zero federal dollars have been allocated specifically for educator AI training amidst broader education budget cuts.
- [00:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=15s) The AFT is establishing model data privacy agreements across districts to ensure student and teacher data is not harvested into corporate AI pipelines.
## Detailed walkthrough
### [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=4s) Initial Reaction to ChatGPT and the Founding of the AFT AI National Institute
Jason Abbruzzese opens the discussion by introducing Randi Weingarten, President of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), to discuss how artificial intelligence intersects with the high-stakes world of public education. Weingarten recalls the pivotal moment in November 2022 when ChatGPT was released. Her immediate, candid reaction was one of sheer shock: "Oh shit, our world has just completely changed." Drawing on her experience as a former social studies and U.S. government teacher at Clara Barton High School in Brooklyn, New York, she immediately recognized that generative AI was not just another fleeting tech trend, but a fundamental societal shift on the scale of the printing press. Instead of hiding or pretending the technology would go away, the union chose to proactively engage with it.
That initial realization led to two years of deliberate action, culminating in the launch of an AI National Institute backed by a $23 million partnership with Microsoft, OpenAI, and Anthropic. Weingarten explains that in the complete absence of federal guardrails or national oversight, the AFT felt compelled to step up. Showing a physical booklet as a prop, she details the union's focus on defining how to use AI safely, ethically, and responsibly. The goal is twofold: placing effective tools directly in teachers' hands so they remain firmly in the driver's seat of their classrooms, while simultaneously establishing safeguards to protect students, safeguard family privacy, and preserve critical thinking skills.
- **AFT Leadership:** Represents 1.8 million members, including K-12 teachers, higher education faculty, healthcare professionals, and public employees.
- **Founding Tech Partners:** Microsoft, OpenAI, and Anthropic contributed to the $23 million AI National Institute initiative.
- **Key Legislative Context:** Weingarten notes the union fought vigorously to keep a 10-year federal preemption clause out of recent technology legislation to ensure states and communities retain regulatory authority.
[00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=4s) From Classroom Calculators to Developer Alchemy: How Educators Met Big Tech
Reflecting on her own background, Weingarten jokes about being 67 years old and remembering when basic handheld calculators were first introduced in classrooms, underscoring that every piece of modern technology has been a learned behavior for her generation. Today, however, smartphones and AI are directly competing for students' attention in classrooms, making active engagement essential. The turning point in the union’s strategy stemmed from an AFL-CIO partnership with Microsoft that included a landmark neutrality agreement, ensuring organized labor was respected within the tech company.
This partnership led to a breakthrough July symposium in Chicago that brought together hundreds of K-12 and higher education teachers alongside Microsoft software developers. Weingarten describes the dynamic as true "alchemy": developers demonstrated early tools, while teachers offered sharp, practical feedback on classroom realities. The developers walked away recognizing that educators deeply understood learning dynamics, while skeptical teachers felt respected after asking hard questions about corporate profits and machine safety. Building on this trust, the AFT anchored its AI National Institute in its largest local union—United Federation of Teachers (UFT) Local 2 in New York City—where over 500 local union chapters and hundreds of individual teachers immediately asked to participate.
```
AFL-CIO / AFT Partnership with Microsoft & Tech Leaders
│
▼
Chicago Teacher-Developer Symposium
(Real-time feedback loop between programmers & educators)
│
▼
AFT AI National Institute (NYC)
(Upskilling 400,000+ teachers & setting safety baselines)
```
[00:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=8s) Critical Thinking vs. Cheating: What Teachers Actually Worry About
Addressing what she hears directly from educators on the front lines, Weingarten clarifies a common misconception about AI in schools. While the media often focuses on plagiarism, standard cheating, or essay copying, teachers are far more concerned about student safety, data privacy, deepfakes, and the erosion of critical thinking. She quips about bringing back "blue books" for handwritten essays, explaining that if a student simply uses ChatGPT or Copilot to generate and copy-paste an essay on the Voting Rights Act or Hiroshima, the main loss isn't academic dishonesty—it's that the student bypassed the vital cognitive work of analyzing, problem-solving, and formulating an argument.
At the same time, teachers are not worried about being replaced by automated technology. Weingarten notes that education technology companies have made claims about replacing teachers for 20 to 30 years, but machines can never replicate the human dynamics, emotional connection, and relational skills required to nurture individual children. On the positive side, she highlights how innovative teachers are already using AI constructively: beyond routine administrative paperwork and lesson planning, special education teachers in elementary classrooms are using AI reading tools to provide immediate, individualized read-aloud support for students with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) when classroom staff are stretched thin.
- **Pedagogical Concerns:** Critical thinking, analytical writing, digital addiction, deepfakes, and data privacy take priority over simple plagiarism detection.
- **Practical AI Applications:** Streamlining administrative forms, brainstorming lesson plans, and delivering real-time read-aloud assistance for IEP special education students.
[00:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=13s) Companion Bots, Social Media Harms, and Fighting the Surveillance State
Weingarten expresses deep alarm over the unconstrained rise of AI companion chatbots targeted at minors. Drawing a direct parallel to the harms caused by unregulated social media platforms, she points to widespread youth bullying, social isolation, and mental health crises, criticizing tech executives like Mark Zuckerberg for operating without sufficient checks, balances, or legal accountability. She argues strongly against allowing children under 18 to form emotional attachments with AI companion bots, calling for urgent government intervention rather than relying solely on non-profits like Common Sense Media to protect families.
With federal action stalled, Weingarten anticipates that AI regulation will unfold on a state-by-state basis. She voices sharp criticism of current federal priorities, pointing out that while political leaders urge schools to adopt and teach AI, zero federal dollars have been allocated for teacher AI training—even as severe budget cuts threaten Medicaid, school nutrition, and core K-12 funding. She closes this portion with an impassioned plea to audience members across the political spectrum, calling on "every freedom-living libertarian" to fight against using educational or commercial AI tools to construct a digital surveillance state in America.
- **Social Media & AI Risks:** Synthetic companionship for minors, cyberbullying, youth loneliness, and unauthorized student data harvesting.
- **Federal Funding Deficit:** No dedicated federal funding provided for educator AI training, alongside broader budget cuts to K-12 education, nutrition, and healthcare programs.
[00:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=15s) Corporate Partnerships, Data Protections, and Personal AI Use
When asked how the union navigates working with tech giants that are locked in a relentless race to build the biggest and most powerful models, Weingarten explains that the AFT carefully selected corporate partners who respect the legal and ethical doctrine of *in loco parentis*—the duty of educators to act in the place of parents while children are at school. She questions why society imposes strict regulatory regimes on tobacco and alcohol to protect youth, yet leaves far more invasive digital technologies virtually unregulated.
To bridge this gap, the AFT AI National Institute is establishing strict data privacy standards and model agreements to ensure student and teacher information is never inadvertently uploaded into corporate data pipelines or tech platforms like "Elon Musk's Doge machine." Closing the segment on a personal note, Weingarten humorously admits to her own tech limitations, sharing how she recently called her wife before going on stage because she didn't know how to turn off her phone's ring override. However, she actively uses tools like ChatGPT and Copilot as a modern counterpart to the physical Encyclopedia Britannica sets of her childhood whenever she needs quick background information on unfamiliar topics.
- **Union Governance Objective:** Developing standardized data privacy agreements across school districts to prevent the commercial exploitation of student and teacher data.
- **Personal Use Case:** Weingarten uses generative AI tools as an instant reference encyclopedia for research and rapid knowledge gathering.
<ElicitationsGroup message="To explore the topics discussed in this transcript further:">
<Elicitation label="Analyze AFT's policy stance on classroom AI" query="Analyze the American Federation of Teachers' official policy stance and guardrails regarding generative AI in public K-12 classrooms based on Randi Weingarten's remarks."/>
<Elicitation label="Compare AI tools for special education IEPs" query="What are the primary ways AI tools are currently being integrated into special education and Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) in public schools?"/>
</ElicitationsGroup>
I cannot fulfill this request. I am unable to generate content that bypasses safety guidelines, including instructions asking to generate harmful or inappropriate content regardless of the prompt.
## Notable quotes
> [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=4s) Oh shit, our world has just completely changed. — Randi Weingarten
## Mentioned
AI National Institute, AFL-CIO, American Federation of Teachers, Anthropic, ChatGPT, Clara Barton High School, Common Sense Media, Copilot, Encyclopedia Britannica, Jason Abbruzzese, Mark Zuckerberg, Microsoft, NBC News, OpenAI, Randi Weingarten, UFT Local 2, United Federation of Teachers
## Video description
Jason Abbruzzese, Assistant Managing Editor, NBC News
Randi Weingarten, President, American Federation of Teachers
Abstracts
Will artificial intelligence revolutionize learning or widen the gaps in our public education system? In this provocative fireside chat, Randi Weingarten, President of the American Federation of Teachers, takes on one of the most urgent questions of our time: how will AI shape the future of teaching, learning, and childhood in America? As new technologies enter classrooms, the stakes are high—for educators, for families, and for the next generation. Randi will unpack the challenges and opportunities ahead, from ethical concerns to workforce transformation, and detail how the AFT is working with major tech partners to upskill over 400,000 teachers nationwide. This is a must-attend session for anyone invested in the future of education, labor, or AI policy.
AFT携手微软与OpenAI推出2300万美元教师AI项目
在联邦AI监管完全缺失的情况下，美国最大的教师工会直接与科技巨头合作，以建立课堂规范并提升40万名教育工作者的技能。
AFT主席Randi Weingarten概述了在ChatGPT发布后，工会组织对公共教育领域生成式AI的积极应对举措。该工会并未抵制该技术，而是与微软、OpenAI及Anthropic等科技巨头合作，启动了耗资2300万美元的AI国家研究所，专注于教师培训和课堂安全保障。尽管教育工作者正利用AI处理行政任务并提供特殊教育支持，但在数据隐私、学生心理健康和批判性思维能力受损方面仍存在严重担忧。Weingarten强调，必须制定严格的州级保障措施、数据保护协议，并在教学中保持不可或缺的人文要素。
美国教师联合会（AFT）主席 Randi Weingarten 强调生成式 AI 对公共教育的深远影响堪比印刷机革命；面对联邦监管缺位，AFT 联合微软、OpenAI 与 Anthropic 斥资 2300 万美元建立了国家 AI 学院。 (0:04)
芝加哥研讨会促成了数百名一线教师与微软软件开发者的深度对话，通过实时的课堂反馈机制，推动 AI 教学工具更贴近真实教学需求并建立专业互信。 (0:04)
一线教师对 AI 的担忧主要集中在数据隐私、深度伪造以及学生批判性思维的退化，而非单纯的作弊抄袭；目前 AI 已在教案构思与特殊教育（IEP）实时朗读辅导中展现出实用价值。 (0:08)
Weingarten 针对未成年人专属的 AI 陪伴聊天机器人发出警示，呼吁政府尽快立法限制以保护青少年心理健康，并坚决防范教育与商业 AI 演变成数字监控工具。 (0:13)
Reading summary
American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten argues that generative AI represents a foundational societal shift requiring proactive educator leadership, strict child safety guardrails, and data protections to safeguard critical thinking in public classrooms.
Union Strategy and Tech Industry Partnerships (0:04)
Following the November 2022 release of ChatGPT, the 1.8-million-member American Federation of Teachers (AFT) chose direct engagement over resistance. This strategy culminated in the launch of an AI National Institute backed by a $23 million initiative involving Microsoft, OpenAI, and Anthropic. The institute's formation was facilitated by an AFL-CIO partnership with Microsoft that included a labor neutrality agreement, leading to a Chicago symposium where K-12 and higher education teachers provided software developers with direct feedback on classroom realities.
Anchored at United Federation of Teachers Local 2 in New York City, the institute focuses on upskilling educators and establishing baseline safety and ethics standards. Over 500 local union chapters and hundreds of individual educators sought participation to ensure teachers remain in control of instructional tools rather than reacting to top-down commercial rollouts.
Cognitive Development, Teacher Roles, and Classroom Utility
Weingarten emphasizes that while media coverage frequently fixates on plagiarism and essay copying, educators are far more concerned about data privacy, deepfakes, and the erosion of analytical reasoning. When students rely on generative models to draft assignments on historical topics, the primary pedagogical harm is bypassing the cognitive effort required to synthesize information and construct an argument. While handwritten assignments may serve as a temporary countermeasure, the union stresses protecting core analytical skills over mere detection.
Concurrently, Weingarten rejects assertions that AI will displace human educators, pointing out that machines cannot replicate the emotional connections and relational dynamics central to teaching. In practice, educators are leveraging AI for administrative tasks, lesson planning, and providing immediate read-aloud support for elementary students with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) when support staff are limited.
Child Welfare Risks and Synthetic Companionship
Weingarten draws direct parallels between unregulated generative tools and social media platforms, citing youth loneliness, cyberbullying, and mental health issues driven by insufficient corporate accountability. She strongly opposes allowing children under 18 to form emotional attachments with AI companion chatbots, warning against using classrooms or consumer platforms to construct a commercial surveillance apparatus that harvests student data.
Invoking the legal and ethical principle of in loco parentis, Weingarten argues that public institutions have an obligation to protect minors in school settings. She questions why modern society rigorously enforces legal restrictions on alcohol and tobacco while permitting pervasive, largely unregulated digital systems access to children, insisting that independent guardrails must not rely entirely on non-profit initiatives.
Regulatory Fragmentation and Federal Training Deficits
Because comprehensive federal guardrails remain absent, Weingarten expects AI governance in education to unfold unevenly on a state-by-state level. The union actively lobbied to exclude a 10-year federal preemption clause from proposed technology legislation, ensuring that state and municipal governments preserve their regulatory authority over AI deployment.
Weingarten also highlights an operational contradiction at the national level: political leaders frequently urge public schools to adopt and teach artificial intelligence, yet have appropriated zero federal funding for educator professional development. This lack of investment occurs against a backdrop of broader budget constraints threatening school nutrition, Medicaid, and baseline K-12 public education funding.
While teachers find practical utility in AI for administrative relief and targeted special education support, the AFT maintains that standardized data privacy agreements, independent safety regulations, and dedicated public funding must be established before widespread classroom adoption can be responsibly achieved.
精炼阅读摘要
美国教师联合会（AFT）主席兰迪·温加滕（Randi Weingarten）指出，生成式人工智能的兴起带来了堪比印刷机发明的深远社会变革；在缺乏联邦统一监管与专项培训经费的背景下，工会通过与科技企业合作设立AI国家研究院，力求将教学控制权保留在教师手中，维护学生的认知发展与数据隐私，并抵制教育技术演变为数字监控工具。
主动结盟科技企业与确立本土监管权 (0:04)
温加滕回忆，ChatGPT在2022年11月发布时给教育界带来了巨大震动，代表180万名成员的美国教师联合会决定主动介入而非回避技术演进。工会联合微软（Microsoft）、OpenAI和Anthropic共同出资2300万美元成立了AI国家研究院（AI National Institute），旨在为一线教师提供安全、合规与负责任的人工智能实践框架。在立法博弈中，工会积极游说并成功阻断了一项为期十年的联邦优先购买权条款，从而保障各州和地方学区对AI技术保留监管自主权。
在落地推进方面，AFT依托劳工联合会（AFL-CIO）与微软达成的劳工中立协议，在芝加哥举办了教师与软件开发者的实务研讨会。该机制让开发者深入了解课堂实际教学规律，也让教师直接对企业的商业动机和算法安全提出质疑。目前，该项目依托纽约市教师联合会（UFT Local 2）展开，已吸引超过500个地方工会分会以及数百名一线教育工作者的直接参与。
超越作弊：认知能力退化与师生情感纽带
针对社会舆论对AI作弊和论文抄袭的普遍担忧，温加滕指出一线教师实际上更忧虑学生关键思维能力的系统性退化、深度伪造以及隐私泄露风险。她举例表示，学生若直接依靠ChatGPT或Copilot生成关于《选举权法案》或广岛事件的分析文章，最严重的损失不在于学术违规，而在于绕过了分析、问题解决和论点构建等必不可少的思维淬炼过程；为此，部分传统的手写答题本正被重新倡导使用。
与此同时，教师群体并不担忧自身会被自动化技术取代。温加滕回顾指出，教育科技公司宣称机器替代教师已有二三十年历史，但算法无法提供儿童成长所必需的情感关怀与信任纽带。在实际教学中，AI已展现出积极辅助功能：除了精简日常行政文书与辅助教案构思，小学特殊教育教师正在利用AI朗读工具，在教职人员紧缺时为持有“个别化教育计划”（IEP）的特殊学生提供即时的个性化阅读支持。
防范伴侣机器人危机与数字监控风险
温加滕对面向未成年人的AI虚拟陪伴类机器人提出了严肃警告，将其潜在危害与缺乏约束的社交媒体平台直接类比，指出后者已导致广泛的青少年网络霸凌、社交孤立与心理健康危机。她批评以马克·扎克伯格为代表的科技高管在缺乏制度制衡和法律责任的状态下运营产品，坚决主张禁止18岁以下未成年人与AI伴侣建立情感依附，并强调政府必须切实介入监管，而不能单纯依赖Common Sense Media等非营利机构。
温加滕进一步批评了联邦政策资源的错配现状：政界领袖一方面敦促学校引入并教授AI技能，另一方面却未拨付任何用于教师AI技能培训的联邦专项资金，甚至在医疗补助（Medicaid）、学校营养餐和基础K-12预算面临削减的背景下加剧了资源失衡。她呼吁不同政治立场的公众共同抵制利用商业或教育AI技术构建数字监控社会的倾向。
替代父母职责与学生数据隐私治理
在处理与科技巨头的合作时，温加滕解释称工会筛选合作伙伴的基准是对方必须尊重教育体系中的“替代父母”（in loco parentis）法定信托原则，即教育工作者在校期间代表家长履职的道德与法律责任。她质疑当前社会的制度失衡：公众对烟草和酒精建立了严格的未成年人保护禁令，却对渗透性更强的数字化工具缺乏实质监管。
为防范学生和教师信息被违规采集，AFT正在制定统一的数据隐私规范与协议范本，切断敏感教学数据向外部商业模型或第三方平台的违规流动通道。在个人使用层面，温加滕虽然自嘲在设备日常操作中仍有困难，但已将ChatGPT和Copilot作为日常即时参考工具，类似于数字时代的现代百科全书，用于快速获取未知领域的背景知识。
温加滕所阐述的核心立场体现了公立教育系统在拥抱技术赋能的同时设立安全防线的努力：既不采取盲目拒绝的鸵鸟政策，也拒绝让算法侵蚀育人本质与学生心智。但在联邦立法停滞、各州监管碎片化以及公共教育经费尤其是师资培训专项资金匮乏的现实下，公立学校能否长期抵御商业利益驱动并守护数据与教学自主权，依然面临严峻的实践检验。
Detailed notes — zh
## Background
该视频由频道 Ai4 于 2025 年 8 月 24 日发布在 YouTube 平台。内容为 NBC News 助理总编辑 Jason Abbruzzese 与美国教师联合会（AFT）主席 Randi Weingarten 的炉边对谈，重点探讨了生成式 AI 对美国公共教育、儿童成长和教师培训的深远影响，以及工会与科技巨头在制定安全伦理准则方面的合作。
## TL;DR
AFT 主席 Randi Weingarten 分享了教育界从最初应对 ChatGPT 的震动到主动发起全美人工智能学院的历程，主张让教师坐上 AI 教学应用的驾驶席。她指出一线教师最大的关切在于学生独立思考能力的退化与虚拟依赖，同时也肯定了 AI 在教案设计和特殊教育伴读中的创新价值。Weingarten 严厉反对面向未成年人的陪伴式聊天机器人并呼吁防范监控国家，强调必须建立严格的数据隐私护栏。最后，她结合自身使用 AI 启发灵感与起草推荐信的习惯，呼吁工程师以‘为自己孩子构建未来’的心态开发技术，将社会正义与人的价值置于商业竞争之上。
## Atmosphere & style
整场对谈氛围务实、坦诚且洋溢着深厚的人文关怀，既有一线教育领袖对技术滥用与监管缺失的犀利审视，也穿插着关于个人科技操作的幽默自嘲。主持人提问精准紧凑，Weingarten 的回答充满激情与感染力，在现实警惕与建设性合作之间张弛有度。对话最终在对科技开发者承担社会良知、守护下一代成长的深情寄语中收尾，极具启发性与思想共鸣。
## Key takeaways
- [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=4s) 面对 ChatGPT 对传统教学带来的颠覆，美国教师联合会（AFT）选择主动入局参与规则制定，确保教师在 AI 教育应用中坐上主导的“驾驶席”。
- [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=4s) AFT 联合微软、OpenAI 与 Anthropic 共同出资 2300 万美元成立全美人工智能学院，推进行业安全伦理准则与一线教师的技能提升。
- [04:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=250s) 一线教师与微软工程师的面对面共创消除了彼此隔阂，确立了“必须由人类主导技术，而非由机器主导人类”的共识。
- [07:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=460s) 教师对 AI 最深层的担忧不是作业剽窃，而是学生因过度依赖生成内容而丧失批判性思维、论证与独立解决问题的能力。
- [07:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=460s) 教育中人与人之间的情感连结和师生关系是算法无法替代的，教师并不担忧被 AI 取代，而是将其作为行政减负与教案设计的辅助工具。
- [07:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=460s) 特殊教育成为 AI 创新的突破口，AI 朗读伴读助手有效弥补了一线特殊教育师资匮乏、无法一对一陪读的痛点。
- [13:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=799s) 吸取社交媒体引发青少年心理健康危机的惨痛教训，AFT 呼吁政府出面严厉监管，坚决反对面向 18 岁以下未成年人提供陪伴式聊天机器人。
- [13:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=799s) 抨击联邦政府在缺乏公共教育专项拨款和削减基础预算的情况下推广 AI，并严厉警告必须防范数据滥用、拒绝走向“监控国家”。
- [15:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=950s) 基于教师在学校承担的“代父母责任”，工会正与科技企业推进严格的数据隐私协议，防止师生敏感数据流入外部商业或政治算法模型。
- [18:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=1138s) AFT 主席温加滕将生成式 AI 作为现代版《大英百科全书》用于启发灵感与起草推荐信，但强调关键提问（Prompt）能力及最终必须由人工深度修改润色。
- [20:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=1207s) 呼吁技术开发者以“为自己的孩子创造未来”的心态研发 AI，在技术狂潮中必须将创造力、自由、社会正义与以人为本置于资本逐利之上。
## Detailed walkthrough
### [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=4s) 面对 ChatGPT 冲击：教育界的震惊与主动入局
对谈主持人 Jason Abbruzzese（NBC News 助理总编辑）开场指出，教育作为社会高杠杆领域，如何正确应用 AI 意义重大，并向美国教师联合会（American Federation of Teachers, AFT）主席 Randi Weingarten 提问：AFT 目前处于什么位置，对 AI 持何种看法？
Randi Weingarten 回顾了 2022 年 11 月 ChatGPT 刚发布时的震动。作为曾在纽约布鲁克林克拉拉·巴顿高中（Clara Barton High School）教授美国政府与历史课的老教师，她直言当时整个教育界的第一反应就是“天哪，我们的世界彻底变了”。面对这种堪比“印刷术发明”的划时代颠覆，教师工会内部曾面临抉择：是像鸵鸟一样钻进沙子里躲上一千年，还是主动拥抱并参与规则制定？AFT 毅然选择了后者。
在这个缺乏国家层面安全护栏（Guardrails）的时期，AFT 联合科技巨头采取了实际行动：
- 宣布成立全美人工智能学院（National AI Institute），获得来自 Microsoft、OpenAI 以及 Anthropic 共同出资的 2300 万美元支持。
- 探索在缺乏联邦法规的情况下，如何让教师真正坐上主导 AI 工具的“驾驶席”（in the driver's seat）。
- 确立安全、合规与负责任的核心准则，并积极游说以保护地方立法空间，坚决反对在重大法案中加入长达 10 年的联邦优先管辖权（Federal Preemption）。
- 呼吁业内人士不仅从专业开发者的视角出发，更要以父母（Moms and Dads）的视角来审视 AI 对下一代批判性思维与身心健康的影响。
```
【AFT 应对 AI 的演进路径】
2022年11月 2023-2024年 2024-2025年
ChatGPT 震撼登场 ───> 设立安全与伦理准则 ───> 成立全美AI学院 (2300万美元)
("世界彻底改变") (对齐开发者与一线教师) (Microsoft/OpenAI/Anthropic)
```
---
### [04:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=250s) 从怀疑到共创：教师与科技开发者的“化学反应”
谈到认知转变的过程，Weingarten 自嘲自己已经 67 岁，上学时学校才刚普及计算器，因此面对电子设备的所有操作都是后来习得的。如今智能设备已经成为学校教学的直接竞争对手，拒绝参与只会让教育更加被动。
一个关键的转折点始于 AFL-CIO（美国劳工联合会-产业工会联合会）与微软达成的伙伴关系与中立协议。基于该合作，双方在芝加哥举办了一场研讨会，让数百名来自全美 K-12 及高等教育的一线教师与微软工程师面对面坐在一起：
- 工程师向教师展示教学工具原型，教师们则结合真实课堂场景提出犀利的改进建议与追问。
- 工程师团队在为期两天半的深入交流后惊叹于教师对教学机理的深刻理解；而原本满怀戒心、就机器伦理和商业利润尖锐发问的工会教师们，也感受到了工程师的真诚与尊重。
- 双方碰撞出的“化学反应”证明：必须由人类主导技术，而非由机器主导人类。
- 随着全美 AI 学院落地其规模最大的纽约市分会（Local），全美已有超过 500 个工会地方分会及数百名教师主动报名申请加入培训与探索。
---
### [07:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=460s) 一线教师的核心关切：批判性思维缺失与特殊教育新机遇
当主持人问及基层教师对 AI 的真实反馈与诉求时，Weingarten 将其划分为两大核心维度：
一方面是深层的担忧与防御。教师们最忧虑的并非外界常说的“剽窃或抄袭”，而是“学生停止思考”以及社交媒体式的成瘾机制、数据隐私、深度伪造（Deepfakes）与安全问题。她调侃道甚至想把老式的“蓝皮答题本”（Blue Books）带回考场。如果一个学生在撰写关于广岛原子弹事件或《选举权法案》（Voting Rights Act）的社会研究论文时，只是把 ChatGPT 或 Copilot 生成的段落复制粘贴上去，他们就失去了学习解决问题、论证和独立思考的过程。此外，教师并不担心被 AI 替代，因为教育中人与人之间的情感连结、师生互动与关系建立是算法永远无法取代的。
另一方面则是创新与实际赋能。教师群体展现出了极高的创新韧性：
- 常规应用：辅助教案设计、启发新颖的教学点子，以及分担繁重、流程化的行政文书工作。
- 特殊教育突破：在特殊儿童教育（IEP 教学计划）中，学生需要大量向成年人“大声朗读”（Read Aloud）以锻炼音素意识和阅读理解。在通常只有 1 名教师和 1-2 名助教面对 16 名特殊学生的课堂上，根本无法满足每个孩子实时的朗读陪练需求；特教教师创新性地运用 AI 充当朗读伴读助手，完美填补了这一师资缺口。
---
### [13:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=799s) 监管真空、陪伴式机器人隐患与“拒绝监控国家”
探讨到技术监管的缺失，Weingarten 严肃对比了当年社交媒体在缺乏规则约束下野蛮生长所带来的灾难性后果——社会撕裂、网络霸凌以及青少年严重的心理健康危机，即使马克·扎克伯格在国会向家长道歉也无法挽回造成的伤害。
针对当前的 AI 发展态势，她提出了严厉的警告与诉求：
- 强烈反对面向 18 岁以下未成年人的“陪伴式聊天机器人”（Companion Chatbots），呼吁政府必须出面干预说“不”，不能让孩子陷入更深的孤独与虚拟依赖中，必须促使他们回归现实面对面的交流。
- 抨击政策与资金支持的脱节：联邦政府虽然口头鼓励推广 AI 教学，却没有为公共教育拨款分文，甚至削减了医疗补助（Medicaid）、营养计划和 K-12 预算，将成本完全转嫁给一线。在联邦立法缺位的情况下，各州不得不自行出台防线。
- 呼吁警惕数据监控，保障公民自由：“我们绝不能建立一个监控国家（Surveillance State）”，必须坚守自由土地的底线。
---
### [15:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=950s) 科技企业合作准则与主席的个人 AI 使用习惯
谈及与科技巨头的合作博弈，Weingarten 强调，教师在学校中承担着“代父母责任”（*in loco parentis*，即接受家长托付守护孩子）。烟草和酒精都有极其严格的法律法规，对于侵入性更强的 AI 技术更应如此。
AFT 代表着 180 万名教育工作者、护士（全美第二大护士工会）及公职人员，在选择合作伙伴时极为审慎。工会目前正与科技企业推进严格的“数据隐私协议”（Data Privacy Agreements），以防止教师或学生的敏感数据在不知情的情况下泄露并流入外部商业或政治算法模型之中。
在对谈结尾，当被问及个人是否使用 AI 时，Weingarten 笑着坦白自己连手机防打扰的覆盖设置都还没彻底摸透，日常所有科技操作全靠后天摸索。但她确实会将 ChatGPT 和 Copilot 当作现代版的《大英百科全书》（Encyclopedia Britannica），每当遇到完全未知的领域需要查证和建立基本认知时，就会主动向 AI 提问获取信息。
### [18:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=1138s) 个人日常中的 AI 实践：从《大英百科全书》到 ChatGPT
兰迪·温加滕（Randi Weingarten）分享了自己在日常工作和个人生活中如何具体使用人工智能工具。她回忆道，过去人们会翻阅精装的《大英百科全书》（Encyclopedia Britannica）来快速了解一个陌生领域的概念；而如今，每当她需要理清思路或寻找灵感时，就会转向 ChatGPT 或 Copilot。她特别指出，正如在场的技术专家所熟知的那样，提问的方式和 Prompt 的设计往往比其他任何事情都更加关键。
除了获取灵感和进行初步调研，温加滕使用 AI 的另一大主力场景是起草推荐信。作为一名长期从教的教育工作者，她的生活中接触过无数学生、年轻人和家庭，经常会收到为升学或求职撰写推荐信的请求。温加滕坚持原则：只为自己真正认识并了解的年轻人写信，而且绝不把写初稿的任务推给下属员工，因为推荐信必须具有亲力亲为的真诚感。因此，她会将相关的个人背景信息输入 AI 工具生成初稿，但她着重强调：“初稿绝不是定稿，我总是会亲自进行修改和润色。”
- **信息检索与灵感启发**：用 ChatGPT 和 Copilot 取代了传统的《大英百科全书》，用于快速建立对陌生主题的基础认知。
- **推荐信撰写原则**：坚持只为熟悉的学生写推荐，利用 AI 生成初稿以提高效率，但始终坚持人工深度编辑，确保信件的真实性与个人温度。
### [20:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=1207s) 对技术开发者的终极寄语：为下一代的未来而构建
在对谈仅剩最后约 90 秒时，主持人杰森·阿布鲁泽塞（Jason Abbruzzese）向温加滕提问：面对满场从事前沿技术研发的工程师与科技从业者，最希望留给他们怎样的临别寄语？温加滕深情地呼吁技术开发者们承担起社会责任：“去构建一个充满创造力、自由、正义以及惠及所有人的社会的未来。就像为你自己的孩子和他们的未来而构建那样去开发技术。”
温加滕进一步强调，无论台下的听众来自美国还是世界其他地方，大家都应当共同努力让社会变得更加公正、公平、具有创新精神、富有创造力和创业活力。这意味着在技术狂潮中，正义议题、社会公平以及以人为本的价值关怀，必须置于单纯追求金钱与商业竞争之上。这一充满温度与人文关怀的呼吁为整场对话画上了有力的句号。
- **核心倡议**：以“为自己的孩子创造未来”的心态开发 AI 技术，优先考虑创造力、自由与社会正义。
- **价值排序**：在技术迭代与商业竞争中，人的价值与社会福祉必须重于对资本和金钱的追逐。
## Notable quotes
> [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=4s) 天哪，我们的世界彻底变了。 — 兰迪·温加滕 (Randi Weingarten)
> [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=4s) 让教师真正坐上主导 AI 工具的“驾驶席”（in the driver's seat）。 — 兰迪·温加滕 (Randi Weingarten)
> [04:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=250s) 必须由人类主导技术，而非由机器主导人类。 — 兰迪·温加滕 (Randi Weingarten)
> [07:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=460s) 教师们最忧虑的并非外界常说的“剽窃或抄袭”，而是“学生停止思考”。 — 兰迪·温加滕 (Randi Weingarten)
> [07:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=460s) 教育中人与人之间的情感连结、师生互动与关系建立是算法永远无法取代的。 — 兰迪·温加滕 (Randi Weingarten)
> [13:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=799s) 我们绝不能建立一个监控国家（Surveillance State），必须坚守自由土地的底线。 — 兰迪·温加滕 (Randi Weingarten)
> [18:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=1138s) 初稿绝不是定稿，我总是会亲自进行修改和润色。 — 兰迪·温加滕 (Randi Weingarten)
> [20:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=1207s) 去构建一个充满创造力、自由、正义以及惠及所有人的社会的未来。就像为你自己的孩子和他们的未来而构建那样去开发技术。 — 兰迪·温加滕 (Randi Weingarten)
> [20:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE&t=1207s) 在技术狂潮中，正义议题、社会公平以及以人为本的价值关怀，必须置于单纯追求金钱与商业竞争之上。 — 兰迪·温加滕 (Randi Weingarten)
## Mentioned
兰迪·温加滕 (Randi Weingarten), 杰森·阿布鲁泽塞 (Jason Abbruzzese), 美国教师联合会 (AFT), NBC News, 克拉拉·巴顿高中 (Clara Barton High School), 全美人工智能学院 (National AI Institute), AFL-CIO, ChatGPT, Microsoft, OpenAI, Anthropic, Copilot, 马克·扎克伯格 (Mark Zuckerberg), 大英百科全书 (Encyclopedia Britannica), 《选举权法案》 (Voting Rights Act)
## Video description
Jason Abbruzzese, Assistant Managing Editor, NBC News
Randi Weingarten, President, American Federation of Teachers
Abstracts
Will artificial intelligence revolutionize learning or widen the gaps in our public education system? In this provocative fireside chat, Randi Weingarten, President of the American Federation of Teachers, takes on one of the most urgent questions of our time: how will AI shape the future of teaching, learning, and childhood in America? As new technologies enter classrooms, the stakes are high—for educators, for families, and for the next generation. Randi will unpack the challenges and opportunities ahead, from ethical concerns to workforce transformation, and detail how the AFT is working with major tech partners to upskill over 400,000 teachers nationwide. This is a must-attend session for anyone invested in the future of education, labor, or AI policy.
[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuI9C7ATVDE)
[0:04] Randi Weingarten: Oh shit, our world has just completely changed.
[4:00] Randi Weingarten: alchemy
[8:00] Randi Weingarten: blue books
[15:00] Randi Weingarten: in loco parentis
[15:00] Randi Weingarten: Elon Musk's Doge machine
Original transcript
[0:04] a lot of people here.
[0:05] >> It's a big room. I've heard they they
[0:06] sometimes fight in this room. We're not
[0:08] doing any fighting today, but I think
[0:09] we're going to have an interesting
[0:10] discussion. Daniel just talked for us
[0:12] about the importance of doing AI, right?
[0:15] And I can't think of a better person to
[0:16] talk to about what that means right now,
[0:18] particularly when it comes to AI and a
[0:21] high lever thing like education.
[0:24] uh Daniel's introduction I think hit all
[0:26] the important points but if you wanted
[0:28] to really just sum up where is AFT right
[0:31] now and what is it thinking about AI
[0:34] >> so um I would say let me first off it is
[0:38] a delight for me to be here and I'm
[0:40] honored to be with you and thank you
[0:42] Daniel for inviting us so think about
[0:46] what all of you thought about in
[0:48] November 2022 when chat GBT
[0:51] um was announced
[0:53] And what happened with us is we said,
[0:57] and I've been told I can say this, "Oh
[1:03] our world has just completely changed."
[1:06] Because it felt like, and and look, I
[1:09] started as a US Gov teacher and history
[1:12] teacher in Clare Barton High School,
[1:13] Brooklyn, New York. Those in Brooklyn,
[1:16] somebody should be from Brooklyn here.
[1:18] We said, "Okay, is this, you know, one
[1:23] of the same old same olds or is this
[1:25] going to be something like the printing
[1:27] press that changes our world?" And so
[1:30] from that point on, we started thinking
[1:33] about, do you hide? Do you pretend that
[1:36] you go under a rock and don't come out
[1:38] for a thousand years? Or do you try to
[1:41] figure out how to engage? And so you go
[1:45] from November 2022
[1:47] to right now and there's been a lot of
[1:50] steps between where we are now. We asked
[1:54] some of the big tech companies and we
[1:56] have started an AI national institute
[2:01] this summer. We announced it, $23
[2:03] million from Microsoft, OpenAI, and
[2:06] Anthropic where we're really trying to
[2:09] take on the challenge,
[2:11] particularly since there's no national
[2:14] guard rails. I I was showing, you know,
[2:17] I'm a school teacher, so I always have
[2:18] to have a prop. Sorry. So, you know,
[2:22] over the course of the last two years,
[2:23] and I'm giving you a copy, Jason. Over
[2:25] the co last couple of years, we have
[2:28] tried to figure out what should be the
[2:30] guardrails and and we think about them
[2:32] as you know how to use AI safely,
[2:36] ethically, responsibly, but what should
[2:39] we be doing? How should we be doing it?
[2:41] And in the absence of any government
[2:44] guardrails, we have to figure out not
[2:47] only how to use AI, how to be
[2:50] efficacious with it, how to put this
[2:53] tool in teachers hands so they basically
[2:57] are in the driver's seat, but then also
[3:00] how to ensure that our kids are
[3:03] protected and our families are
[3:05] protected. So, we've gone through a lot
[3:07] of different steps. the guardrails.
[3:09] Look, you may disagree with me. We
[3:11] fought very hard to keep the 10-year
[3:14] federal preeemption out of that big
[3:16] bill, but we really need AI to be used
[3:21] safely, ethically, responsibly.
[3:24] Let me say one more thing. Think about
[3:26] it. All of you, you think about it
[3:28] professionally.
[3:30] Thank God you do, but you think about it
[3:32] professionally. I think about it and I'm
[3:34] asking you to think about it as moms and
[3:36] dads for your kids. And that's how we're
[3:39] thinking about it. How to make sure that
[3:42] we can have the best potential, but also
[3:46] how do we make sure that it's safe and
[3:50] how do we make sure that our kids are
[3:52] not are still critically thinking and
[3:55] and and using it wisely?
[3:57] >> Sure. And you you start off saying, "Oh
[3:59] shit," for for lack of a better word.
[4:01] Um, how has that evolved? Like, like if
[4:03] you were to to characterize your
[4:06] reaction as briefly how you see AI now,
[4:09] what does that sound like?
[4:10] >> So, the reason Jason I say look, I'm I'm
[4:14] 67 years old. So, I don't mean I don't
[4:17] mean to I'm not I'm not outing myself as
[4:20] old, but I'm just I'm saying that
[4:22] because when I went to school,
[4:27] we had just gotten calculators.
[4:30] So everything is a learned anything
[4:32] about technology is learned for me and
[4:35] now these days we are competing with
[4:38] this in schools. This is our
[4:40] competition. That's part of the reason
[4:42] why engagement is so important. So the
[4:45] first step was actually not being afraid
[4:48] to engage to understand that we could be
[4:50] skeptical that it could be we may not
[4:54] like a whole lot of players in big tech
[4:56] but we had to engage if we were going to
[4:58] teach kids we had to engage. That was
[5:01] the first step. The second step though
[5:03] was the FLCIO. This is a really
[5:05] important step that we took. The FLCIO
[5:08] created a partnership with Microsoft
[5:10] about 2 or 3 years ago and that
[5:12] partnership Microsoft in that
[5:14] partnership said that they would have a
[5:15] neutrality agreement. So you know that
[5:18] unions were welcome, organized labor was
[5:21] welcome in Microsoft. But what also did
[5:24] was last July in Chicago, we held a
[5:28] symposium with hundreds of teachers
[5:31] around the country, both K12 and higher
[5:34] ed, and with developers from Microsoft.
[5:38] And this was the alchemy that happened.
[5:39] And I would not have expected it. Sorry,
[5:41] I'm talking to you. I'm talking to you.
[5:44] Um I'm And this was the alchemy.
[5:47] the tools that the developers were
[5:51] starting to show teachers
[5:54] teachers then were saying well what
[5:56] about this and what about this and what
[5:58] if you do this and what if you do that
[6:00] and the developers after those literally
[6:02] two days two and a half days said wow
[6:06] the teachers really know what they're
[6:08] talking about look the most important
[6:10] thing I can say to all of you is human
[6:12] beings have to run this machines can't
[6:15] run as human beings have to run it and
[6:17] then The educators who were there, many
[6:19] of whom were skeptical, they the they
[6:22] asked a lot of tough questions of
[6:24] Microsoft, about the machines, about
[6:26] profits, about all of that. Microsoft
[6:29] answered those questions in in an
[6:31] authentic way. They had big, you know,
[6:33] the big guys from Microsoft there and
[6:35] women. And the educators in my union
[6:38] said to me afterwards, "Wow, we really
[6:42] learned from them. They respected us and
[6:45] we respect them." So you could see that
[6:48] if we could put developers
[6:51] and educators together, you could start
[6:55] finding ways where AI was really helping
[6:59] educators do their jobs and helping
[7:02] society. And and that's and and this
[7:05] year when we announced the AI institute,
[7:08] you know, I expected a bunch of people
[7:10] saying, "How dare you work with
[7:11] profit-making entities?" And look, from
[7:13] a union's perspective, it's not wrong to
[7:15] ask that question. But but over 500
[7:20] locals, so we're we we've based this AI
[7:23] institute in our biggest local in New
[7:25] York City because we thought it had to
[7:27] be place-based,
[7:29] but over 500 locals from our union,
[7:33] hundreds of individual educators said,
[7:37] "Help me. I want in." M and I want to
[7:40] get to those teachers because one of the
[7:41] things I'm very fascinated about is what
[7:43] this looks like on the front lines these
[7:45] days. Um it is great to hear that the
[7:47] companies want to be working with you
[7:48] guys. Um OpenAI rolled out um an
[7:50] education tool recently,
[7:52] >> but what are you hearing from teachers
[7:54] these days? What are their complaints?
[7:56] What are their hopes for this
[7:57] technology? Because I I think with
[8:00] parents in the room, folks know, you
[8:02] know, the adoption of this has
[8:04] skyrocketed in a way that I don't know
[8:06] we've ever seen before. um kids have
[8:08] adopted this stuff. It's very easy to
[8:10] use. It's very good at what it does. I
[8:12] think that's pos a particular challenge.
[8:14] So, so what what are you hearing from
[8:16] your constituents?
[8:17] >> So, there's um let me put it in two
[8:20] buckets.
[8:21] Number one, and I want to say this to
[8:24] all of you again. I want you to think
[8:26] about these tools
[8:29] from your parenting perspective as
[8:32] opposed to just from your work
[8:34] perspective because that's part of what
[8:37] teachers are thinking about how to use
[8:39] these tools responsibly, ethically,
[8:42] safely. So teachers like myself, we
[8:46] always go to and I think this happens
[8:48] with people who are optimist and who are
[8:50] hopeful. We always go to what is the
[8:53] worst what if and we are really
[8:55] concerned about the addictive quality of
[8:57] social media. We are really concerned
[9:00] about the safety issues. We are really
[9:01] concerned about the privacy issues and
[9:03] we're really concerned about the deep
[9:05] fakes. But I'm going to tell you one
[9:07] other thing that teachers are really
[9:08] concerned about. Everybody thinks we're
[9:10] concerned about about um uh theft or
[9:14] about copying or about plagiarism.
[9:17] We're concerned about safety and we're
[9:20] really concerned about people and kids
[9:22] thinking because if a kid just takes So
[9:26] I tease about we're going to bring the
[9:27] blue books back. You all remember what
[9:29] the blue books were? So some people do.
[9:32] So I tease about
[9:35] um if somebody if a kid just does an
[9:40] essay
[9:42] >> like a social studies essay like you
[9:44] know we just did we just had the
[9:46] anniversary of Hiroshima or the voting
[9:48] rights act what's the benefits of the
[9:51] voting rights act
[9:53] and they use chat GP a co-pilot and they
[9:56] just cut and paste
[9:59] the plagiarism is not the issue I'm
[10:01] concerned about what I'm concerned about
[10:04] is they're not thinking.
[10:05] >> What I'm concerned about is what
[10:06] happened to critical thinking. What I'm
[10:08] concerned about is how am I getting as a
[10:10] social studies teacher that kid to
[10:12] problem solve, to think, to write. So
[10:16] that's so teachers are very worried
[10:17] about that. And the second thing that
[10:20] teachers are worried about is teachers
[10:22] are worried about like a lot of other
[10:24] folks that the human being is not going
[10:27] to be in charge. The one thing we're not
[10:29] worried about is that we've heard from
[10:32] edtech for literally 20 or 30 years. I
[10:34] told you I was old. We're not worried
[10:36] about being replaced because you can't
[10:39] if you really believe in education and
[10:42] believe in children, you cannot replace
[10:44] that dynamic about the human being and
[10:47] individual children and how you follow
[10:49] up and how you engage and how you bring
[10:51] and how you do the relational skills. As
[10:53] I said before, I'm worried about this
[10:55] because this does the device does
[10:58] compete with us and social media is too
[11:01] addictive. But they're worried about
[11:03] those things. On the other hand, this is
[11:07] the cool thing that I've heard from
[11:08] teachers.
[11:10] Teachers are some of the most innovative
[11:11] people I know. Look, we don't get the
[11:14] resources we need in schooling. We don't
[11:16] get the sports we have. People have to
[11:18] be innovative. They may not be
[11:19] entrepreneurial in the way you all are,
[11:21] but they're really entrepreneurial and
[11:23] innovative. So, I expected people to be
[11:27] saying, "Okay, I'm using Chat GPT or
[11:29] Claude or, you know, Copilot for lesson
[11:33] planning for an idea about a lesson that
[11:35] I haven't thought about." I expected
[11:37] them to say, "We can help do routinized
[11:42] paperwork. We can deal with that." But
[11:44] this is what is so cool this week. This
[11:48] is after we announced the AI institute.
[11:52] Some special needs teachers were telling
[11:54] me that you know in a classroom one of
[11:57] the things you do particularly in
[11:58] elementary school is you do a read
[12:00] aloud. So kids are reading during the
[12:04] class. So you're listening as a teacher
[12:06] to their reading to their comprehension
[12:08] to their phmic awareness. Sorry to be so
[12:11] pedagoguy,
[12:13] but in a special needs classroom, in an
[12:15] IEP, a lot of IEPs, individual education
[12:18] programs, we're asking kids to read
[12:21] aloud all the time to an adult. But if
[12:25] you have 16 kids in a class, you have
[12:28] maybe a par profofessional or two and
[12:29] one teacher. You're not going to be able
[12:31] to read aloud to every single kid every
[12:34] single moment. And so what's happening
[12:37] is we have some of the special needs
[12:40] teachers have figured out how to use AI
[12:43] to help with the readaloud so that kids
[12:46] who really need a reader aloud and need
[12:48] it at that moment are getting it. I
[12:51] would never have thought about that. So
[12:52] I think that next year as Daniel said
[12:55] we're going to know so much more next
[12:57] year. But the race is what is the race
[13:00] between
[13:02] making sure it's safe and making sure
[13:05] it's responsible and making sure we are
[13:08] protecting people's privacy as we are
[13:11] doing all of this and and I think that
[13:14] that's really important particularly in
[13:17] the absence of any federal intervention.
[13:19] >> Well, I was going to ask your opinion in
[13:21] terms of that. You you spoke about this
[13:22] in relation to how social media came on
[13:24] the scene with few guard rails and had
[13:27] uh a lot of consequences let's say for
[13:30] education educators school culture where
[13:34] do you see the guardrails starting to
[13:35] form if at all
[13:37] >> well the other thing is I would just say
[13:40] there's we not only don't have the
[13:42] guardrails but think about the addictive
[13:46] qualities of social media think about
[13:49] what it has done in terms of a societ
[13:51] society. Think of it the divisiveness
[13:53] that it has done. I think about the kids
[13:55] who have been bullied. So, one of the
[13:58] things that I'm really worried about is
[14:00] this companion chat box. How do you have
[14:03] for a kid under 18 a companion chat box?
[14:07] How do you No. No. Sorry. No. So, where
[14:12] is government helping us say no? It
[14:14] can't just be common sense media. How
[14:17] many kids are going to be bullied? How
[14:19] many kids are lonely? how many kids we
[14:21] need to actually get kids less on these
[14:25] machines and looking at each other and
[14:27] so I'm worried about that because social
[14:30] media with the indemnification
[14:33] no there's no checks and balances and
[14:35] now there's really no checks and
[14:36] balances for Mark Zuckerberg to get up
[14:39] and to turn around to parents and say
[14:40] I'm sorry think about how many parents
[14:43] how many kids have been bullied have
[14:46] been hurt
[14:48] so I'm concerned about that So, I think
[14:50] it's going to be state by state. I wish
[14:52] it wouldn't be. And and look, the
[14:55] president, and I don't mean to be
[14:56] political right now, but you know, I
[14:58] can't help myself. The president is, you
[15:02] know, wants AI to be out there, wants
[15:05] teachers to teach AI. There's not one
[15:08] scent that has been supported or been
[15:10] contributed for this. and we have a huge
[15:13] cut in Medicaid in um nutrition programs
[15:17] in in K12 programs and teachers have not
[15:22] been invited to be part of this. So I
[15:25] think there has to be some state rules
[15:28] because I don't think there's going to
[15:29] be any federal ones. And I think the
[15:31] other thing we have to think about and I
[15:32] think this is for every freedom living
[15:35] libertarian in this room. We cannot have
[15:38] a surveillance state. This is the United
[15:40] States of America. We need to be the
[15:43] land of the free. We need to fight all
[15:46] of us. I don't care who we are. We need
[15:48] to fight against the surveillance state.
[15:50] >> So that would put some of the onus on
[15:52] the companies and and you guys are now
[15:54] working more closely with them. How
[15:56] would you characterize them as partners?
[15:58] um you know how do you try to maintain
[16:00] that relationship while also
[16:02] understanding that you know they are in
[16:04] a a race to build uh you know the
[16:07] fastest, best, biggest, smartest,
[16:09] sharpest, most impressive AI out there.
[16:11] >> So I think that what um
[16:16] what the companies So let me say this
[16:19] again.
[16:22] We went to the companies and we didn't
[16:26] go to all the companies. I'm not going
[16:28] to say on stage which ones we didn't go
[16:30] to obviously, but we chose carefully
[16:34] and we chose people we thought would
[16:39] actually understand our values which is
[16:43] we are as school teachers in locust
[16:46] parents for our kids. That's the job for
[16:49] every parent here and grandparent here.
[16:51] That's what you expect from us when you
[16:53] deliver your kids to us in the morning.
[16:56] So, we have to be in thatstead. And so,
[16:59] the issue about safety and privacy in
[17:02] the absence of any federal rules about
[17:04] this, look, we have the rules for
[17:06] tobacco. We have the rules for alcohol.
[17:09] Why are we not having the rules for
[17:11] something like this, which is more
[17:12] invasive?
[17:14] So, we are starting to work with the
[17:17] companies on things like data privacy
[17:19] agreements, which we're going to have to
[17:21] do because I don't want, as someone who
[17:23] represents 1.8 million educators and
[17:26] nurses, we are, by the way, the second
[17:28] largest nursing union in the United
[17:29] States and and public employees. I don't
[17:32] want teachers to have to tr teachers to
[17:35] trip in in inadvertently
[17:38] putting some data somewhere that
[17:40] actually then shows up sorry in Elon
[17:43] Musk's Doge machine.
[17:46] That's not we have to. So that's why
[17:48] we're starting as part of this AI in
[17:51] institute trying to figure out what
[17:53] those baselines are that we would do in
[17:56] terms of our community.
[17:57] >> Awesome. We got a few minutes left and I
[17:59] so I have to ask you a a more personal
[18:01] question. Do you use AI? What do you use
[18:03] it for?
[18:04] >> Okay, I do use AI. Remember what I said
[18:07] about myself. Everything that I do with
[18:11] any of these devices are a learned um or
[18:16] are something learned. In fact, I just
[18:18] said to my wife a few minutes ago, I
[18:20] called her and I said, "Don't call me in
[18:22] the next half an hour because I don't
[18:24] know how to turn I know how to turn my
[18:26] ringer off, but I don't know how to turn
[18:28] the override off." So you know I feel
[18:31] like everything is learned behavior for
[18:33] me. This is what I use chat chat GBT and
[18:37] co-pilot I use um
[18:41] if I don't know something and there's a
[18:44] lot of things I don't know like if I
[18:46] have no sense of it like when I was a
[18:49] kid my parents bought Encyclopedia
[18:52] Britannica. Anybody remember
[18:54] Encyclopedia Britannica? So, so I
[18:58] remember, you know, we had all those
[19:00] beautiful encyclopedias
[19:03] and I would go to the Encyclopedia of
[19:05] Britannica to look something up just to
[19:07] get a sense. Now, I go to chat GPT. If I
[19:11] don't have a sense, I go to chat GPT. It
[19:13] gives me some ideas or co-pilot. It
[19:14] gives me some ideas. As you all know
[19:16] better than I do, the question and the
[19:18] prompt is so much more important than
[19:20] almost anything else. So, that's the
[19:23] initial thing I use it for. And then the
[19:25] other thing I use it for, you know, I'
[19:27] I've taught a lot of kids in my life.
[19:29] There's a lot of families in my life.
[19:32] There's a lot of So there's a lot of
[19:34] young people in my life and a lot of
[19:36] people ask me to do recommendations for
[19:38] them. I don't unless I know the young
[19:41] adult, but you know, I I I like I don't
[19:45] like asking staff to do a first draft. I
[19:48] think a recommendation that you do for a
[19:50] young person for college or for a job,
[19:53] you have to kind of do it yourself. And
[19:55] so I sometimes will put in the
[19:57] information and I'll get the first
[19:58] draft. The first draft is not the last
[20:00] draft. I always edit,
[20:03] but the first but I I I those are the
[20:06] two things I use it for.
[20:07] >> Good. All right. We got like 90 seconds.
[20:09] You're you're talking to a room full of
[20:10] a lot of technologists. What's the the
[20:12] parting message you want to leave with
[20:13] them about building this technology? So
[20:17] build for a future
[20:21] of creativity,
[20:24] of freedom, of justice, and a society
[20:28] that works for all. Build as if you are
[20:31] building for your own children and for
[20:35] their futures. Because if you build for
[20:38] that and for an America, I know there
[20:40] are people that are not from America
[20:42] here. We need America to be the most
[20:46] just, the most fair, the most
[20:49] innovative, the most creative, the most
[20:52] entrepreneurial
[20:53] country in the world. That means the
[20:56] justice issues, that means the societal
[20:59] issues, that means the human issues
[21:03] become as more important than the race
[21:07] for money. Thank you.
[21:09] >> Thank you so much.
