Yang Says Tech CEOs Plan 30% to 50% Layoffs to Boost AI Margins

Fireside Chat with Andrew Yang, Noble Mobile and Jacob Bogage, Reuters — Ai4

Ai4

Surging capital investment in artificial intelligence is driving labor's share of national income to a post-1929 low as corporations eliminate entry-level white-collar work.

AI-assisted summary of Fireside Chat with Andrew Yang, Noble Mobile and Jacob Bogage, Reuters — original source. Check the original for full context.

Source published: 2026-08-22

Detailed notes

## Background Published on YouTube by Ai4 on August 22, 2026, this fireside chat features Andrew Yang, CEO of Noble Mobile, in conversation with Reuters White House correspondent Jacob Bogage. The session examines the socioeconomic impacts of artificial intelligence, consumer data dynamics, and new political movements.

## TL;DR Andrew Yang and Jacob Bogage explore the deep divide between tech-sector AI optimism and widespread public anxiety over automation and corporate layoffs. Yang highlights how capital is aggressively shifting into data centers and cloud infrastructure while cutting out entry-level knowledge workers and depressing labor's share of national income. He makes the case for human-centered capitalism, discusses his venture Noble Mobile's effort to counter telecom gouging and screen addiction, and outlines the Forward Party's strategy to break congressional duopoly with independent Senate candidates.

## Atmosphere & style The conversation carries a sharp, pragmatic tone that balances sobering economic realities with Yang's trademark self-deprecating humor and witty candor. Bogage acts as an engaged and incisive interlocutor, prompting Yang to reveal candid boardroom admissions about workforce reductions while keeping the dialogue accessible and lively. The session feels both urgent and grounded, moving briskly from serious critiques of technological exploitation to optimistic, practical blueprints for political and digital reform.

## Key takeaways - [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=4s) Widespread public distrust of AI is rooted in rational economic anxiety, with recent college graduate underemployment hovering near 50% as screen-based knowledge work faces rapid automation. - [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=4s) Corporate executives privately admit plans to cut 30% to 50% of their workforce to capture AI efficiencies and protect margins, despite refusing to acknowledge these layoffs publicly. - [02:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=178s) Data center construction has emerged as a major political wedge issue, triggering local backlash over 24/7 noise pollution, heightened electricity bills, and strained municipal water supplies. - [02:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=178s) To overcome community opposition to AI infrastructure, economic planners should distribute immediate tangible perks, such as subsidizing local household utilities. - [05:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=322s) U.S. capital investment in data centers now surpasses spending on commercial office buildings, physically reflecting the replacement of human office workers with computing infrastructure. - [05:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=322s) Companies are silently eliminating entry-level roles for junior engineers and analysts in favor of AI tools, creating a structural barrier for young workers entering the labor market. - [05:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=322s) Young job seekers should avoid accumulating further educational debt or relying on automated online job boards, focusing instead on in-person networking and face-to-face meetings. - [09:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=554s) Labor's share of U.S. gross national income has fallen to 43%—the lowest level since 1929—as economic value hyper-concentrates into AI models and capital assets. - [09:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=554s) Trillion-dollar AI models are trained on hundreds of billions of dollars worth of harvested public user data without providing compensation to the original creators. - [10:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=658s) Human-centered capitalism should prioritize health, caretaking, and human flourishing through broad wealth circulation rather than resorting to tribal political attacks on high earners. - [13:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=782s) The American wireless market extracts roughly $100 billion more annually than European markets due to marked-up roaming fees and high monthly bills, an inefficiency Noble Mobile aims to correct. - [15:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=923s) Algorithmic addiction and teen mental health struggles are systemic collective action problems that require decisive regulatory intervention rather than shifting blame onto individual parents. - [17:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=1042s) The Forward Party is pursuing a two-senator fulcrum strategy by backing competitive independent candidates capable of holding the balance of power and forcing bipartisan compromises.

## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=4s) The Divide Between Tech Optimism and Public Anxiety

Jacob Bogage, a White House correspondent covering the economic portfolio for Reuters, opens the session by addressing the stark contrast between the enthusiasm inside the room and the widespread skepticism across the country. While the audience consists largely of AI optimists looking forward to technological breakthroughs and financial windfalls, recent polling reveals that the broader American public deeply distrusts artificial intelligence. Solid majorities express low approval, fearing the technology will erode personal relationships and undermine creative thinking.

Andrew Yang argues that everyday Americans are not irrational for fearing AI; rather, "they're nervous because they're smart." While industry insiders and tech workers expect AI to make them more efficient, powerful, and wealthy, the average citizen realizes they will be on the outside looking in. With underemployment among recent college graduates hovering near 50%, parents already worry about adult children moving back home while their own livelihoods face disruption. Yang emphasizes that virtually any role requiring someone to sit at a computer and look at a screen—including software coders, call center operators, drivers, marketers, and researchers—is vulnerable to automation.

To illustrate how aggressively companies are moving behind closed doors, Yang shares that tech executives frequently invite him to lunch to treat him like a "priest" for private confessions. CEOs admit they plan to lay off 30% to 50% of their staff to boost corporate margins and secure their own bonuses, confessing that their boards will replace them if they refuse to automate. When Yang asks if they will state this publicly, they flatly refuse. He summarizes the prevailing sentiment among regular working families plainly: "AI is going to f*** me and mine."

- Underemployment among recent college graduates is approaching 50%. - Vulnerable job categories include software engineering, call centers, marketing, research, driving, and routine knowledge work. - Corporate executives privately plan workforce reductions of 30% to 50% to capture efficiency gains and protect executive compensation.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: The AI Labor and Capital Divide subgraph Insiders["Tech Insiders & Executives"] A["AI Optimism & Capital Investment"] --> B["Efficiency, Productivity & Executive Bonuses"] end subgraph Workforce["Knowledge Workers & Public"] C["Screen-Based White-Collar Jobs"] --> D["Automation & Replacement"] D --> E["Rising Underemployment (~50% College Grads)"] end subgraph Macro["Macro Shift"] B -.->|"Jettisons 30-50% Staff"| D D --> F["Labor Share of GNI Drops to 43%"] end ```

---

[02:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=178s) The Politics of Data Centers and Emerging Wedge Issues

Reflecting on the shifting political landscape, Yang jokes about his 2020 presidential run as the "magical Asian man from the future who wanted to give everyone money because AI was going to eat the jobs." He notes a distinct divergence in how political factions approach the technology: while the administration moves full speed ahead aiming to be tech's best friend and mainstream Democrats have remained relatively muted, insurgent left-wing candidates have turned AI and infrastructure into a potent wedge issue, rallying around slogans like "no new data centers."

This tension is especially visible in state-level economic development. Recounting a recent trip to Michigan, Yang explains that state planners are aggressively competing with Ohio to attract data centers for the tax revenue they generate. However, local residents are pushing back with strong resistance that blends traditional NIMBYism with broader anxieties about AI. Communities worry that these massive, humming facilities will drive up local utility bills, drain municipal water reserves for cooling systems, and produce continuous ambient noise, all while offering little visible upside to ordinary residents.

Yang's strategic advice to economic planners is simple: distribute tangible benefits immediately to overcome public mistrust. He suggests offering clear community perks, such as providing free utility services for a year to households within a certain radius of any new facility, rather than letting anti-data center outrage fester on social media.

- Michigan and Ohio are actively competing to attract commercial data center investments for municipal tax revenues. - Public resistance centers on 24/7 noise pollution, increased electricity rates, and high water consumption required for facility cooling. - Yang recommends localized benefit-sharing, such as subsidizing resident utilities, to counteract community opposition.

---

[05:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=322s) The "Unhired Whippersnappers" and Advice for Young Job Seekers

Bogage brings the discussion around to Yang's own venture, Noble Mobile, and asks how these labor trends are manifesting on the ground. Yang candidly reveals that Noble Mobile has already eliminated entry-level postings for junior engineers, data analysts, and researchers, choosing instead to handle those tasks with AI. He points out that "the easiest people to fire are those you have not hired yet," creating a silent crisis of hundreds of thousands of "unhired whippersnappers" shut out of corporate entry points across the economy.

Yang underscores the scale of this capital shift by highlighting that the United States now spends more capital on data centers than on commercial office buildings. He calls this the ultimate metaphor for the new economy: servers and algorithms are physically replacing office workers. When speaking to working-class audiences in Michigan, he pointed out the absurdity of Wall Street's narrative: "Hey, we're going to spend $3 trillion on AI, but it's not going to affect any of your jobs."

``` +------------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Traditional Career Assumptions | The Emerging AI Reality | +------------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Go to graduate or law school | Debt accumulates; law school apps | | to ride out labor downturns. | surge 21% into automated markets. | +------------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Submit polished resumes to digital | Resumes are processed and rejected | | job boards and online postings. | by automated AI-to-AI filters. | +------------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Entry-level junior analyst/coder | Companies replace junior roles | | pipelines serve as career ladders. | directly with AI tools and agents. | +------------------------------------+------------------------------------+ ```

For young people navigating this environment, Yang offers blunt, practical advice: - **Avoid taking on more debt:** Pursuing more schooling is no longer a guaranteed sanctuary. Despite a 21% surge in law school applications, future job prospects remain deeply uncertain. - **Stop sending resumes into the digital void:** Online applications and platforms like LinkedIn are increasingly dominated by automated "AI-to-AI" interactions where human recruiters never see applicant files. - **Force in-person connections:** Job seekers must leverage their parents' and friends' personal networks to sit down for face-to-face coffee meetings with decision-makers who cannot easily ignore them.

---

[09:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=554s) The Capital Vortex and "Where's My Thousand Bucks?"

Bogage holds up Yang's book, teasing him with the recurring question from his signature Universal Basic Income campaign: "Hey, Yang. Where's my thousand bucks?" Yang laughs, joking that an alternate title for his book was *"Hey, Am I Racist or Are You Andrew Yang?"* before turning back to the underlying economic reality.

Yang explains that economic value is being aggressively consolidated into the cloud through an unprecedented vortex of AI models, raw data processing power, and concentrated capital. This dynamic is driving labor's share of gross national income down to 43%—the lowest level recorded since 1929. The modern economy is increasingly punishing individuals who trade their time and intellect for wages, wiping out middle-tier knowledge workers while hyper-concentrating returns among capital owners.

Furthermore, Yang emphasizes that everyday citizens generated the foundational training data powering this revolution. Technology giants harvest and resell public user data in transactions worth hundreds of billions of dollars each year to train state-of-the-art models, yet the individuals who created the underlying value have not received a single dime in return.

- Labor's share of U.S. gross national income has dropped to 43%, reaching its lowest point since 1929. - Job polarization is accelerating, hollowing out white-collar, middle-tier knowledge work. - Trillions in AI asset creation rely on harvested public data without financial compensation to the original creators.

[10:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=658s) Human-Centered Capitalism vs. Tribal Politics

When Jacob Bogage notes that debates around labor disruption are validating Andrew Yang's signature proposals, Yang jokes that his ideas are "aging pretty well" as observers look back at his universal basic income platform. However, when Bogage asks about progressive politicians executing similar ideas—specifically referencing New York Assembly member Zohran Mamdani—Yang immediately draws a sharp boundary. While acknowledging that a certain strain of progressivism is gaining traction, Yang distinguishes his own platform as an anti-tribal, universalist philosophy rather than an ideological crusade against the wealthy.

Yang argues for a "human-centered version of capitalism" centered on human flourishing, health, wellness, caretaking, and the arts. In this framework, innovation and personal financial success remain positive forces so long as wealth circulates broadly through society. He criticizes modern progressive politics for doubling down on tribalism and demonizing successful individuals as enemies. Instead of placing blame, Yang advocates appealing to enlightened self-interest, remarking that for the ultra-wealthy, "it's better above ground than in the bunker" and "better without a bulletproof car than with a bulletproof" vehicle.

[13:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=782s) Noble Mobile, "Rectangles of Sadness," and Data Economics

Turning to market interventions, Bogage asks about Noble Mobile, Yang’s telecommunications venture designed around a pay-per-use model that refunds subscribers for unused data and incentivizes reduced screen time. Referencing comedian Hasan Minhaj's description of smartphones as "rectangles of sadness," Yang observes that while nobody tolerates people screaming in their faces in physical reality, digital life exposes users to constant daily screaming matches.

Yang explains that Noble Mobile tackles both mental well-being and consumer extraction. The average American spends roughly $83 per month on wireless bills—with Yang noting he previously paid over $150 for a single Verizon line—compared to the European average of $35 per month. That differential represents a $100 billion annual extraction on a service that Yang considers a basic utility akin to oxygen. Noble Mobile aims to drop average monthly bills to roughly $42, eliminate predatory international roaming charges where carriers mark up a $2 daily carrier cost to $10 or $12, and refund unused monthly data. Embracing his persona, Yang quips that he remains "the magical Asian man from the future who wants to give everyone money," while joking about removing a fake robotic glove to prove he is a real person building revenue-generating companies.

- **US vs. European Wireless Costs**: Americans spend an average of $83 per month versus $35 in Europe, creating an aggregate spending gap of $100 billion annually. - **International Roaming Margins**: Major carriers routinely charge $10 to $12 per day for overseas roaming that costs them only $2 per day to provision. - **Noble Mobile Target**: Reduces the typical wireless bill to approximately $42 per month with automatic cash-back credits for conserved data.

[15:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=923s) Algorithmic Addiction as a Collective Action Problem

Addressing the broader crisis of algorithmic addiction and generative AI content loops, Bogage questions where accountability lies. Yang rejects the rhetoric of placing the burden solely on families, calling it an unfair fight when trillion-dollar companies deploy world-class talent to addict children to dopamine hits for corporate profit. He points to Jonathan Haidt’s bestselling book *The Anxious Generation* as a critical catalyst that mobilized parents and pushed roughly 40 state governments toward restricting youth social media access.

Yang stresses that society should not have had to wait for benign social scientists to address an issue that internal data made evident nearly a decade earlier. He highlights that internal research at platforms like Instagram revealed clear links to depression among teenage girls as early as 2016–2017, only for leadership to bury the findings. He asserts that algorithmic manipulation is fundamentally a collective action problem requiring direct government intervention, dismissing the excuse that regulators cannot oversee technologies they claim not to fully understand.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Algorithmic Addiction Failure and Government Response Model subgraph MarketFailure["Market Exploitation Dynamic"] A["Trillion-Dollar Tech Platforms"] -->|"Optimize engagement via dopamine hits"| B["Algorithmic Addiction & Teen Depression"] B -->|"Buried internal research & shifted burden"| C["Individual Parents Overwhelmed"] end

subgraph CollectiveRemedy["Systemic Intervention"] D["Social Science Research (e.g., Jonathan Haidt)"] -->|"Mobilizes public awareness"| E["Bipartisan State Action (Under-15/16 Social Media Limits)"] E -->|"Federal Leadership & Regulation"| F["Structural Protections over Corporate Profits"] end

C -.->|"Requires shift from personal burden to"| CollectiveRemedy ```

[17:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=1042s) The Forward Party and the Two-Senator Fulcrum Strategy

When asked about his ongoing political ambitions, Yang confirms that he is no longer a Democrat and currently serves as co-founder and co-chair of the Forward Party. Describing the party as the third largest in the United States by resources, Yang notes that half of the electorate now identifies as independent, driven by frustration with two major parties that have become tribal, corrupted, and ideologically rigid. He emphasizes that the Forward Party focuses on building a solutions-oriented coalition capable of brokering grand bargains rather than stoking division.

Yang outlines a concrete legislative strategy focused on the balance of power in the United States Senate. In a chamber split 50/50 or 51/49, a coalition of just two independent senators could operate as a decisive legislative fulcrum. Pointing to Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski—who operates independently of partisan primaries due to Alaska's electoral reforms—Yang highlights two competitive independent Senate candidates positioned to break the duopoly:

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: Two-Senator Fulcrum Strategy subgraph SenateBalance["U.S. Senate Gridlock (50/50 or 51/49 Split)"] Dems["Democratic Caucus"] GOP["Republican Caucus"] end

subgraph FulcrumCoalition["Independent Fulcrum (2 Senators)"] Murkowski["Lisa Murkowski (Alaska Independent Posture)"] Challengers["Independent Challenger (Todd Achilles / Seth Bodnar)"] end

FulcrumCoalition -->|"Holds balance of power"| SenateBalance FulcrumCoalition -->|"Forces bipartisan solutions"| PolicyOutcomes["Pragmatic National Bargains"] ```

- **Todd Achilles (Idaho)**: An Army tank commander veteran running as an independent against 83-year-old Republican incumbent Jim Risch, polling neck-and-neck following the withdrawal of the Democratic nominee. - **Seth Bodnar (Montana)**: An Army airborne veteran and first-in-class West Point graduate running an independent Senate campaign with fundraising parity against the Republican candidate. - **Forward Party Footprint**: Currently boasts 79 elected officials across the country, prioritizing election reform and viable independent candidacies to alter national legislative incentives.

## Notable quotes > [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=4s) they're nervous because they're smart. — Andrew Yang

> [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=4s) AI is going to f*** me and mine. — Andrew Yang

> [02:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=178s) magical Asian man from the future who wanted to give everyone money because AI was going to eat the jobs. — Andrew Yang

> [05:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=322s) the easiest people to fire are those you have not hired yet — Andrew Yang

> [05:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=322s) Hey, we're going to spend $3 trillion on AI, but it's not going to affect any of your jobs. — Andrew Yang

> [09:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=554s) Hey, Yang. Where's my thousand bucks? — Jacob Bogage

> [09:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=554s) Hey, Am I Racist or Are You Andrew Yang? — Andrew Yang

> [10:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=658s) human-centered version of capitalism — Andrew Yang

> [10:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=658s) it's better above ground than in the bunker — Andrew Yang

> [10:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=658s) better without a bulletproof car than with a bulletproof — Andrew Yang

> [13:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=782s) rectangles of sadness — Hasan Minhaj

> [13:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=782s) the magical Asian man from the future who wants to give everyone money — Andrew Yang

## Mentioned Andrew Yang, Jacob Bogage, Reuters, Noble Mobile, Ai4, Verizon, LinkedIn, Zohran Mamdani, Hasan Minhaj, Jonathan Haidt, The Anxious Generation, Instagram, Forward Party, Lisa Murkowski, Todd Achilles, Jim Risch, Seth Bodnar

## Video description Andrew Yang - CEO, Noble Mobile Jacob Bogage - White House Correspondent, Reuters

[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo)

中文简报

Yang称科技公司CEO计划裁员30%至50%以提升AI利润率随着企业削减初级白领岗位，人工智能领域资本投资的激增正将劳动报酬在国民收入中的比重推至1929年以来的最低点。 Andrew Yang与Jacob Bogage探讨了科技界对AI的乐观态度与公众对自动化及企业裁员的普遍焦虑之间的深刻分歧。Yang指出，资本正大规模转向数据中心和云基础设施，同时削减初级知识工作者，并拉低劳动所得在国民收入中的份额。他主张实行以人为本的资本主义，讨论了他的创业公司Noble Mobile在应对电信价格欺诈和屏幕成瘾方面的努力，并概述了前进党（Forward Party）通过独立参议员候选人打破国会两党垄断的策略。公众对 AI 的不信任源于切实的经济焦虑；随着屏幕类知识工作加速自动化，应届大学毕业生不充分就业率已逼近 50%，企业高管更在私下透露计划裁员 30% 至 50% 以削减成本并维持利润率。 (0:04) 数据中心建设因引发全天候噪音污染、电费上涨及市政用水紧张，已成为美国地方政治的新分歧点；杨安泽建议经济规划部门应通过补贴周边居民水电公用事业费用等即时福利来化解社区阻力。 (2:58) 全美在数据中心上的资本支出已正式超过商业写字楼，且企业正大量使用 AI 工具取代初级工程师和分析师等入门级岗位；杨安泽建议年轻求职者避免盲目增加教育债务或向线上招聘平台机械投递简历，应转向线下实体人际网络进行面对面沟通。 (5:22) 随着经济价值高度向 AI 模型、算力与资本资产集中，劳动报酬在美国国民总收入中的占比已骤降至 43%（创 1929 年以来最低水平），导致中层白领知识工作加速空心化。 (9:14)

Reading summary

Andrew Yang and Reuters correspondent Jacob Bogage argue that artificial intelligence is accelerating a historic shift of wealth from wage earners to capital holders, triggering severe white-collar displacement, community infrastructure friction, and algorithmic exploitation. Yang contends that addressing this structural divergence requires human-centered capitalism, local benefit-sharing, and independent political leverage in the U.S. Senate. White-Collar Labor Displacement and Falling Income Share (0:04) Bogage and Yang contrast Silicon Valley optimism with broad public anxiety over AI. Yang reports that corporate executives privately admit plans to reduce staff by 30% to 50% to expand operating margins, targeting routine screen-based positions across software development, research, marketing, and customer service. This automation wave is already stalling entry-level hiring: college graduate underemployment approaches 50%, and Yang notes that his own venture, Noble Mobile, has eliminated entry-level postings for junior engineers and data analysts in favor of automated systems. Yang emphasizes that the U.S. now allocates more capital toward data centers than commercial office buildings, illustrating a structural substitution of physical office workers by algorithms. This consolidation of computing power and models has driven labor's share of U.S. gross national income down to 43%, the lowest level recorded since 1929. Meanwhile, commercial AI models generate trillions in asset value using harvested public data without compensating the original human creators. Localized Backlash to Data Center Expansion (2:58) The rapid expansion of physical computing infrastructure has created intense regional friction. States like Michigan and Ohio compete aggressively to attract commercial data centers for local tax revenue, but municipal projects face rising neighborhood opposition. Residents raise concerns over constant ambient noise, depletion of local water supplies needed for cooling systems, and spikes in residential electricity costs. Yang points out that insurgent political campaigns have begun turning infrastructure development into a potent wedge issue around slogans such as 'no new data centers.' To mitigate local resistance and overcome public mistrust, Yang advises industrial planners to introduce tangible benefit-sharing mechanisms, such as providing free municipal utilities for a year to households living near newly constructed facilities. Consumer Extraction and Algorithmic Mental Health Harms (15:23) Yang characterizes algorithmic addiction and youth mental health deterioration as systemic collective action failures that cannot be addressed solely by parental vigilance. Platforms optimize engagement algorithms for dopamine loops despite internal platform research dating back to 2016–2017 that documented links to teenage depression. Yang cites research by Jonathan Haidt as a catalyst that spurred roughly 40 state governments to enact youth restrictions, arguing that federal regulatory intervention is necessary when corporate profit models exploit cognitive vulnerabilities. Yang identifies parallel consumer extraction in the telecommunications sector. U.S. consumers pay an average of $83 monthly for mobile service compared to $35 in Europe, creating an estimated $100 billion annual spending gap alongside steep roaming markups. Through Noble Mobile, Yang aims to demonstrate an alternative model that lowers average bills to approximately $42 per month by refunding subscribers for unused cellular data. Human-Centered Capitalism and Independent Senate Leverage (10:58) Distinguishing his philosophy from progressive political movements that attack wealth accumulation, Yang advocates for 'human-centered capitalism' focused on health, wellness, caretaking, and artistic output. He argues that enterprise and individual financial success remain beneficial as long as capital circulates broadly, contending that enlightened self-interest should motivate the wealthy to prefer broad stability over social fragmentation. To break legislative paralysis, Yang promotes electoral reform through the Forward Party, which claims 79 elected officials nationwide. Noting that independent voters now represent nearly half the electorate, Yang outlines a strategy targeting the balance of power in a 50/50 or 51/49 U.S. Senate. He argues that an independent fulcrum of just two senators—pointing to Alaska's Lisa Murkowski and independent campaigns by Todd Achilles in Idaho and Seth Bodnar in Montana—could bypass partisan primaries and force pragmatic national policy compromises. While Yang presents basic capital redistribution and independent electoral organizing as necessary counters to widespread automation, his model depends on non-major-party candidates winning tight federal elections and local communities accepting negotiated data infrastructure. Whether market incentives can be steered toward human well-being before AI-driven job obsolescence accelerates further remains unresolved.

精炼阅读摘要

在与路透社记者Jacob Bogage的对话中，前美国总统候选人兼Noble Mobile联合创始人杨安泽（Andrew Yang）指出，人工智能的发展正加剧资本与普通劳动者之间的撕裂，并导致白领初级岗位面临系统性消失。他主张通过“以人为本的资本主义”、基础设施收益本地化共享以及以独立参议员为杠杆的政治机制来重塑利益分配。白领自动化冲击与初级雇佣断层 (0:04) 杨安泽指出，公众对人工智能的警惕具有现实合理性。当前美国应届大学毕业生的不充分就业率已接近50%，且任何依赖屏幕办公的白领岗位——包括软件工程师、呼叫中心人员、市场营销和基础研究人员——均面临被替代的风险。杨安泽透露，多位科技企业首席执行官私下向他承认，为提高企业利润率并保护自身高管奖金，他们正计划裁员30%至50%，且董事会明确要求推进自动化。这种压力导致企业在公开场合与私下表态之间出现巨大反差。在具体实践中，杨安泽以自身企业Noble Mobile为例，说明该机构已全面取消针对初级工程师、数据分析师和研究人员的初级招聘，转而使用AI工具处理相应工作。这种“最容易解雇尚未雇佣者”的企业行为，正在全美切断年轻人的职业阶梯。尽管法律院校申请量因避险心理激增21%，但就业市场前景仍高度不确定；加之招聘流程被AI简历筛选算法把持，杨安泽建议求职青年应避免盲目累积债务，转而通过人际网络建立面对面的线下连接以突破筛选壁垒。算力资本扩张与宏观收入分配失衡 (2:58) 宏观经济层面上，全美在数据中心建设上的资本支出已正式超过商业写字楼，杨安泽将此视为算法和服务器从物理层面取代人类知识工人的象征。他强调，在AI模型、计算能力与高度集中资本的共同作用下，劳动报酬占美国国民总收入（GNI）的比重已降至43%，触及1929年以来的历史最低点。与此同时，科技巨头利用全社会日常产生的数据训练顶尖大模型并获取巨额商业收益，而数据创造者本人却未获得任何直接的经济回报。此外，算力基础设施的落地正演变为激烈的基层政治议题。密歇根州与俄亥俄州等地方政府虽积极争夺商业数据中心项目以获取税收，但引发了当地居民的强烈反弹。公众担忧这些设施的全天候噪音污染、高昂水冷消耗对市政供水的抽取，以及对本地电力费率的推高，甚至催生了“禁止新建数据中心”的政治口号。杨安泽建议地方决策者必须采取切实的利益分享机制，例如为设施周边一定范围内的家庭提供为期一年的免费公用事业补贴，以缓解公众的剥夺感。算法成瘾治理与通信市场价值反哺 (10:58) 针对科技巨头的市场行为，杨安泽提倡建立“以人为本的资本主义”，主张将社会衡量指标转向健康、照护与艺术，同时强调应引导富裕阶层认识到普遍繁荣符合其自身安全利益，而非诉诸对立性的部落政治。在技术伦理层面，他指出数万亿美元市值的平台利用顶尖人才诱导用户对多巴胺产生依赖，早自2016至2017年平台内部研究就已发现其产品与青少年抑郁症相关，但管理层选择掩盖结论。杨安泽强调算法操纵属于集体行动困境，必须依靠政府监管介入，而不能仅归咎于家庭防范。在商业模式探索方面，杨安泽指责传统电信服务存在高额价值榨取。美国用户平均每月无线通讯费用高达83美元，远超欧洲35美元的平均水平，形成了每年约1000亿美元的消费支出差距；运营商对边际成本仅2美元的国际漫游服务加价至10至12美元。杨安泽将Noble Mobile设计为反向商业实验，通过未使用流量返还现金的按需计费模式，力争将人均月话费降至约42美元，意在减少屏幕沉迷的同时打破传统运营商对用户的超额溢价。前进党布局与参议院微弱多数制衡 (17:22) 在政治改革领域，杨安泽确认自己已退出民主党，转而作为联合创始人运营全美按资源计第三大的前进党（Forward Party）。他引述数据指出，全美目前有半数选民自认为独立选民，对两大党派的意识形态僵化深感失望；前进党目前已在全美推动选出79名公职人员，致力于通过选举改革促成务实的问题解决方案。杨安泽提出了针对美国参议院的“双参议员支点策略”。鉴于参议院长期处于50对50或51对49的微弱多数状态，由两名不受党内初选绑架的独立参议员组成的联盟将足以成为决定性立法支点。杨安泽以阿拉斯加州参议员Lisa Murkowski的独立立场为例，重点指出了两位正在竞逐联邦参议员席位的独立候选人：在爱达荷州对阵83岁共和党现任议员的前陆军装甲指挥官Todd Achilles，以及在蒙大拿州与共和党对手募资持平的前陆军空降兵兼西点军校优秀毕业生Seth Bodnar，认为此类独立席位能够倒逼国会达成跨党派重大妥协。杨安泽描绘了AI加速渗透下劳动力价值折损、公共资源挤占及企业权力过度集中的多维挑战，其应对方案涵盖了商业返利、本地利益分成以及通过独立政治力量撬动制度改革。然而，面对两党建制阵营的既得利益壁垒与宏观资本替代劳动的长期趋势，极少数独立议员能否实质性扭转立法僵局，以及局部利益补贴能否遏制更广泛的收入极化，仍有待现实检验。

Detailed notes — zh

## Background 该内容由 Ai4 频道于 2026 年 8 月 22 日发布在 YouTube 平台。视频记录了 Noble Mobile 首席执行官、前美国总统候选人杨安泽（Andrew Yang）与路透社白宫记者雅各布·博加奇（Jacob Bogage）的一场炉边深度对谈。 ## TL;DR 杨安泽在对话中剖析了科技精英的 AI 狂热与普通民众对失业焦虑之间的深刻断层，指出资本正疯狂流向算力服务器而非年轻劳动力，导致白领岗位面临大面积缩减。针对年轻一代，他建议放弃被算法黑洞吞噬的海投简历，转而寻求线下面对面的真实人际连接以打破求职困局。同时，他探讨了其创立的 Noble Mobile 如何对抗手机沉迷与高昂通信成本，并详述了前进党（Forward Party）试图借助两名关键独立参议员重塑美国政局平衡的“支点战略”。 ## Atmosphere & style 对谈氛围轻松坦率又直击痛点，博加奇的尖锐提问与杨安泽幽默自嘲的表达方式相得益彰。讨论在揭露科技高管私下裁员的残酷现实与数据中心引发的民怨之余，始终保持着敏锐的洞察力与行动主义色彩。整场对话既有对技术异化与制度僵局的深刻警惕，又传递出通过商业模式革新与务实政治策略寻求破局的建设性力量。 ## Key takeaways - [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=4s) 大众对 AI 的焦虑源于切实的生存危机：业内人士享受效率红利，而普通家庭面临应届生近 50% 不充分就业及白领岗位被自动化替代的严峻现实。 - [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=4s) 科技高管私下向杨安泽坦白，在董事会绩效与薪酬压力下普遍计划裁员 30% 到 50%，但对外仍保持沉默。 - [03:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=184s) 数据中心建设因推高居民电费、消耗水资源及噪音污染引发社区强烈抵触，杨安泽建议政府与企业必须通过提供免费水电等直接利益化解矛盾。 - [05:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=322s) 企业正通过“停止招聘新人”以隐性削减白领，全美在数据中心的资本支出已超越商业写字楼，标志着服务器和 AI 正在取代人类劳动力。 - [07:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=427s) AI 正在摧毁初级就业，盲目攻读法学院深造潜藏高负债风险，海投电子简历易陷入“AI 筛选 AI”的死循环，唯有依靠线下真实人脉才能突围。 - [09:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=554s) 劳动报酬占美国国民总收入（GNI）的比重降至 43% 的历史低点，AI 资本正将价值疯狂吸入云端，而普通人未从数千亿美元的训练数据中分得任何利益。 - [10:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=658s) 杨安泽倡导“以人为本的资本主义”，拒绝将商业成功者立为公敌的政治部落主义，主张通过开明的利己主义让各阶层共同参与财富再分配谈判。 - [13:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=782s) 杨安泽创办 Noble Mobile 采用未用流量返现模式，旨在打破美国电信巨头每年千亿美元的垄断暴利，同时经济激励用户减少沉迷“悲伤长方形”。 - [15:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=923s) 社交媒体诱导多巴胺上瘾属于典型的集体行动困境，科技巨头刻意隐瞒危害，政府必须承担 100% 的监管责任而非推卸给家长。 - [17:28](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=1048s) 前进党推进参议院“支点战略”，力求在势均力敌的参议院扶持 2 名独立参议员打破两党极化垄断，夺回立法话语权以达成务实妥协。 ## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=4s) 乐观与焦虑的分歧：大众对 AI 的信任危机路透社白宫记者雅各布·博加奇（Jacob Bogage）以轻松的口吻开场，坦言现场观众并不是来听他聊白宫经济报道的，而是为了聆听 Noble Mobile 首席执行官、2020年美国总统候选人安德鲁·杨（Andrew Yang，杨安泽）的见解。博加奇指出，会场内坐满了“AI 乐观主义者”，然而当天的民调数据显示，普通美国民众对 AI 缺乏信任、支持率极低，绝大多数人担心 AI 会削弱人际交往能力与创造性思维。他请杨安泽剖析为何行业内部热情高涨，而普通公众却充满疑虑。杨安泽直言，美国大众之所以感到紧张，恰恰是因为他们“非常聪明且清醒”。在场的行业人士之所以乐观，是因为自身能直接从 AI 技术中获益，借助工具提高效率、获得丰厚回报；但普通人却处于被排斥在外的境地。当前应届大学毕业生的不充分就业率已接近 50%，普通家庭面临的现实是孩子毕业后只能搬回家啃老，父母自身也面临失业风险——无论是呼叫中心员工、程序员、司机，还是营销与研究人员，任何坐在电脑屏幕前的工作未来都面临被自动化替代的风险。杨安泽透露，许多知名科技公司的 CEO 常常约他私下共进午餐，并像在“忏悔室”面对牧师一样向他吐露心声：“我要裁掉 30% 到 50% 的员工，随后我会升职加薪。我心里很难过，但如果不这么做，董事会就会把我换掉。”当杨安泽询问他们是否愿意公开这一现实时，对方总是一口回绝。对普通人而言，AI 带来的直观感受就是正在剥夺他们的生计乃至现实生活。 - 应届大学毕业生不充分就业率目前已接近 50%。 - 白领自动化波及范围涵盖呼叫中心、软件编程、营销推广、学术/商业研究及各类屏幕办公工种。 - 科技高管私下向杨安泽坦白，在提升自身薪酬与保住职位的压力下，计划裁员 30% 至 50%。 --- ### [03:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=184s) 政治博弈升级与数据中心引发的民怨博加奇询问是谁在政治上利用这种公众情绪，以及会产生怎样的后果。杨安泽幽默地回顾了自己当年的竞选经历，调侃自己曾被视作“来自未来、因为 AI 会吃掉所有工作而主张给大家发钱的神奇亚裔男子”。他指出，现任政府采取极力迎合的态度，对科技界有求必应并催促全速前进；而民主党建制派一度保持沉默，直到左翼激进候选人意识到这是一个绝佳的政治议题，开始高呼“禁止新建数据中心”，同时许多传统保守派选民也加入了抵制行列。博加奇追问，这种反数据中心情绪究竟是传统的“邻避效应”（NIMBYism，即单纯讨厌社区内出现 24 小时轰鸣的庞大设施），还是源于对 AI 更深层的恐惧。杨安泽认为两者紧密交织：在地方社区看来，数据中心落户意味着更高的家庭电费、持续的噪音污染以及冷却系统消耗大量水资源，而真正的经济利益却落入外人腰包。杨安泽以自己上个月在密歇根州的演讲为例，密歇根州的经济规划部门正与俄亥俄州激烈竞争以吸引数据中心落户来增加税收，但基层民众的恐惧与抵触却在社交媒体上不断发酵。杨安泽向当地官员建议，必须立刻向社区民众直接让利——例如向周边辐射范围内的所有住户提供为期一年的免费公用事业水电服务，只有让民众看到实实在在的利益，才能化解严重的信任危机。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 数据中心引发的地方矛盾与利益分配困境 subgraph LocalImpact["社区负面外部性 (选民感知)"] A["电网负荷激增 居民电费上涨"] B["冷却系统耗水 水资源承压"] C["设备持续运转 24/7 噪音困扰"] end subgraph PoliticalDynamic["政治与经济博弈"] D["地方政府争夺税收 如密歇根 vs 俄亥俄"] --> F["政治分歧激化 左翼与保守派联手抵制"] E["科技巨头资本扩张"] --> F end subgraph ProposedFix["杨安泽提出的解决方案"] G["直接向周边居民让利 例：提供一年免费公用事业"] end LocalImpact --> F F -.-> G ``` --- ### [05:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=322s) 白领失业潮：资本买服务器而非雇人谈及企业雇佣趋势，杨安泽结合自己创立的 Noble Mobile 现身说法。他坦言，公司已经直接用 AI 取代了初级软件工程师、初级数据分析师的招聘岗位。“解雇一个人最简单的方式，就是压根不去招他。”如果把这一做法推广至全美经济体，意味着数十万原本属于年轻新人的岗位已经在无形中蒸发。杨安泽强调，大型上市公司目前都在盘算削减白领员工规模。全美在数据中心上的资本支出目前已经超过了商业写字楼的支出，这是极具象征意义的转折点——服务器和 AI 正在取代人类成为新的核心劳动力。他在密歇根州演讲时曾向台下观众点破这一荒谬逻辑：“全行业准备在 AI 上砸下 3 万亿美元，但转头却向大家保证‘这绝不会影响你们的工作’——这完全不合逻辑。”经历过制造业多轮自动化冲击的密歇根民众，对此报以深切而无奈的叹息。 - 招聘替代现象蔓延：初级工程师与数据分析师岗位正被 AI 大规模截流。 - 基础设施支出结构逆转：全美数据中心建设投资总额已超过商业办公楼投资。 - 行业资本投入达 3 万亿美元规模，与“不影响就业”的官方说辞形成巨大悖论。 --- ### [07:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=427s) 给年轻求职者的生存建议：打破线上黑洞，重回人际连接面对无法进入会场的年轻一代，博加奇询问杨安泽对这些甚至未曾获得招聘机会的年轻人有何建议。杨安泽首先告诫年轻人，千万不要盲目把“回学校继续深造”当成避风港。目前全美法学院的申请人数暴增了 21%，但他对这些法学院学生三年半后的就业前景极为悲观，盲目读研只会背负更沉重的学生贷款债务。其次，年轻人必须认清招聘流程的现状：海投到网上的电子简历几乎注定石沉大海，因为如今招聘端与求职端充斥着“AI 与 AI 相互对话”的荒谬自动化流程。在 LinkedIn 等平台上，机器筛选机器已成常态，普通投递很难被真正的人类肉眼看到。杨安泽给出的破局法则是“必须想尽一切办法坐到真人面前喝咖啡”。年轻人应当充分挖掘父母、亲戚或朋友父母的人脉网络。他以自身为例坦言，虽然自己每天忽略绝大多数线上消息，但如果有投资人或朋友开口请求“能否和我孩子喝杯咖啡”，出于人情社会的基本礼节便无法拒绝；而一旦面对面交流发现对方确实聪慧过人，往往就能创造出实际的职位契机。 - 盲目深造预警：法学院申请量激增 21%，在 AI 普及趋势下潜藏巨大的负债与就业风险。 - 招聘黑洞现状：求职信与简历筛选大量交由 AI 自主处理，形成机器对机器的无效闭环。 - 核心突围策略：避开纯线上投递，通过熟人网络争取线下一对一的面对面交流机会。 --- ### [09:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=554s) 价值被吸入云端：国民收入占比创历史新低博加奇拿出杨安泽的新书，借书名《杨，我的1000美元在哪里？》（*Hey, Yang. Where's my thousand bucks?*）开玩笑提问。杨安泽笑着回应钱已经在路上，并分享了该书曾考虑过的自嘲式备选书名。随后他切入严肃的经济分配议题，指出当前由 AI、数据处理算力与巨额资本构成的超级风暴正在形成前所未有的漩涡，将全社会创造的大量价值疯狂吸入“云端”。杨安泽列举了关键经济数据：美国劳动者所得占国民总收入（GNI）的比重目前已降至 43%，创下 1929 年以来的最低纪录，且仍在持续下滑。在这一趋势下，依赖“出卖时间与脑力智识换取薪水”的群体将成为最大输家。整个劳动力市场正在急剧两极分化，顶层资本与底层体力劳动留存，而庞大的中产脑力阶层正面临被彻底掏空的危机。杨安泽最后强调，公众的个人数据每年被转手倒卖产生数千亿美元的产值，并被用于训练最前沿的 AI 大模型，而贡献这些数据的普通民众却从未分到分毫。这就是财富在宏观层面被转移与抽走的真实路径。 - 劳动报酬占比暴跌：劳动者在国民总收入中所占份额已降至 43%，触及 1929 年大萧条以来的历史最低点。 - 劳动力市场两极化：中端以认知和思考为核心的白领职位被加速瓦解。 - 数据资产权益失衡：科技巨头利用价值数千亿美元的公众个人数据训练模型，公众未获得任何直接分红。 ### [10:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=658s) 以人为本的资本主义与政治部落主义的对比针对自动化对劳动力市场的冲击，主持人提到杨安泽当年关于全民基本收入（UBI）的讨论在当下得到了印证。杨安泽打趣道，自己当年的那些预见“现在看来保质期还挺长”，越来越多的人开始惊叹其前瞻性。主持人随后将话题引向当时在纽约推行激进进步主义路线的政治人物佐兰·马姆达尼（Zohran Mamdani），询问杨安泽如何看待这种进步主义的执行方式。杨安泽明确将自己的主张与当前某些极左或部落化的进步主义划清界限。他强调，自己过去和现在始终倡导的是一种“以人为本的资本主义”（Human-centered capitalism）——核心在于促进人类的全面发展与繁荣，涵盖身心健康、照料关怀、艺术与创造力。杨安泽认为，科技创新是实现这一愿景的核心动力，商业成功本身是一件好事，关键在于创造的价值能否在社会中充分且合理地循环流动。他批评当代政治中最严重的问题在于日益严重的“部落主义”（Tribalism），部分政客甚至将经济上的成功者直接树立为全民公敌。他主张用“开明的利己主义”将所有人拉到谈判桌前，而不是用指责开场：“无论你是亿万富翁还是其他阶层，生活在地表总比躲在地下掩体强，开普通车总比开防弹车出行好。” ### [13:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=782s) Noble Mobile：用商业模式对抗“悲伤长方形”与数据浪费谈到重塑现有系统时，话题转向了杨安泽创立的新型移动虚拟网络运营商 Noble Mobile。该服务采用按使用量付费（pay-per-use）模式，如果用户减少“刷手机（doomscrolling）”并节省流量，就会获得现金返还。杨安泽援引喜剧演员哈桑·明哈吉（Hasan Minhaj）的比喻，将智能手机称为现代人的“悲伤长方形”（rectangles of sadness）。在现实生活中很少有人会当面冲你咆哮，但在数字世界里，人们每天都在主动或被动地卷入这种充满愤怒的线上骂战。 Noble Mobile 试图通过经济激励改变这一现状。杨安泽指出，美国人平均每月在手机话费上支出 83 美元（他自己此前在 Verizon 每月单线花费甚至超过 150 美元），而欧洲人平均每月仅花费 35 美元。这笔近 50 美元的差额乘以全美人口，意味着每年在无线通信这一早已商品化如氧气般的基础设施上浪费了上千亿美元。Noble Mobile 将话费门槛降低至每月约 42 美元，杜绝了传统运营商每天收取 10 至 12 美元高昂国际漫游费的暴利行为（实际网络成本仅需 2 美元/天），并在月底返还未使用的流量费用，如同一位站在肩头的守护天使时刻提醒用户“省下金钱，保护大脑”。 - **欧美话费差距**：美国平均 83 美元/月 vs 欧洲平均 35 美元/月，全美年溢价支出达 1000 亿美元。 - **漫游溢价对比**：传统运营商收取 10–12 美元/天漫游费，实际接入当地网络成本仅约 2 美元/天。 - **运营进展**：Noble Mobile 已实现数百万美元营收并保持持续增长。 ### [15:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=923s) 算法沉迷与监管责任：集体行动困境与政府缺位对于 AI 生成内容的激增与推荐算法将用户困在无休止的“刷屏循环”中，主持人提出究竟谁该对此承担责任。杨安泽对此问题表达了身为父母的强烈愤怒，他直斥那些将责任完全推给家长的言论极其荒谬：“万亿美元级别的科技巨头雇佣着全球最聪明的人才，靠着让孩子多巴胺上瘾来榨取数十亿美元利润，最后却说要靠父母去监督管控？这简直是疯了。” 杨安泽认为这是一个典型的集体行动困境，必须由政府承担 100% 的监管责任。他提到了好友乔纳森·海特（Jonathan Haidt）所著的《焦虑的一代》（*The Anxious Generation*），该书成功唤醒了全美家长，促使近 40 个州开始立法限制 15 岁以下未成年人使用社交媒体。但他强调，解决这种系统性危机不应依赖良心学者的单打独斗。早在 2016 至 2017 年的数据就已表明 Instagram 正在诱发青少年（特别是年轻女孩）的抑郁倾向，Meta 的内部调查报告同样证实了这一点却选择将其掩盖。政府以“技术太深奥、理解不了”为由逃避监管，完全是对科技资本的纵容。 ### [17:28](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=1048s) 前进党战略：两名独立参议员重塑美国政局的支点效应在政治层面，已退出民主党并共同创立第三大政党“前进党”（Forward Party）的杨安泽，深入阐述了打破美国两党垄断的实际路径。鉴于全美已有 50% 的选民自认是独立选民，而两党机制均已严重腐化且部落化，前进党目前拥有 79 位民选官员，并在筹款能力上远超传统自由意志党和绿党。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 前进党参议院支点战略图 subgraph SenateSplit["参议院两党僵局 (50/50 或 51/49)"] Dems["民主党阵营"] GOP["共和党阵营"] end subgraph FulcrumIndependents["两名关键独立参议员（黄金支点）"] Murkowski["阿拉斯加州：丽莎·穆尔科斯基 (无党派初选/已具实质独立性)"] NewSenator["潜在第二人选： 爱达荷州：托德·阿基里斯 或蒙大拿州：塞思·博德纳"] end FulcrumIndependents -->|"打破僵局 / 掌握关键裁决权"| SenateSplit ``` 杨安泽提出了一项极具实操性的“支点（Fulcrum）战略”：在当前 50-50 或 51-49 势均力敌的美国参议院格局下，只需争取到 2 名独立参议员，即可彻底掌握立法主动权，逼迫两党走向温和与务实谈判。 - **第一位支点**：阿拉斯加州的丽莎·穆尔科斯基（Lisa Murkowski）。由于该州在 2020 年废除了政党初选制，且她曾投票弹劾特朗普，实际上已成为无党派束缚的独立力量。 - **第二位潜在人选**：爱达荷州的托德·阿基里斯（Todd Achilles）。民主党候选人已退选，这位退役陆军坦克指挥官以独立人士身份正与 83 岁的共和党现任参议员吉姆·里施（Jim Risch）民调打平。 - **另一潜在人选**：蒙大拿州的塞思·博德纳（Seth Bodnar）。西点军校第一名毕业、曾跳伞作战的前空降兵指挥官，其独立竞选筹款额是民主党对手的 30 倍，且与共和党候选人持平。杨安泽总结道，前进党的目标是在 2027 年 1 月前建立起这个参议院中间支点，推动去意识形态化、以解决实际问题为导向的国家大妥协。最后，他呼吁公众关注其个人网站 andrewyang.com 与电子简报，共同构建一个真正以人为本的未来。 ## Notable quotes > [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=4s) 我要裁掉 30% 到 50% 的员工，随后我会升职加薪。我心里很难过，但如果不这么做，董事会就会把我换掉。 — 安德鲁·杨（转述科技高管） > [03:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=184s) 来自未来、因为 AI 会吃掉所有工作而主张给大家发钱的神奇亚裔男子 — 安德鲁·杨 > [05:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=322s) 解雇一个人最简单的方式，就是压根不去招他。 — 安德鲁·杨 > [05:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=322s) 全行业准备在 AI 上砸下 3 万亿美元，但转头却向大家保证‘这绝不会影响你们的工作’——这完全不合逻辑。 — 安德鲁·杨 > [07:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=427s) 必须想尽一切办法坐到真人面前喝咖啡。 — 安德鲁·杨 > [09:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=554s) Hey, Yang. Where's my thousand bucks?（杨，我的1000美元在哪里？） — 雅各布·博加奇 > [10:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=658s) 无论你是亿万富翁还是其他阶层，生活在地表总比躲在地下掩体强，开普通车总比开防弹车出行好。 — 安德鲁·杨 > [13:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=782s) 悲伤长方形（rectangles of sadness） — 哈桑·明哈吉（安德鲁·杨援引） > [13:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=782s) 省下金钱，保护大脑。 — 安德鲁·杨 > [15:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo&t=923s) 万亿美元级别的科技巨头雇佣着全球最聪明的人才，靠着让孩子多巴胺上瘾来榨取数十亿美元利润，最后却说要靠父母去监督管控？这简直是疯了。 — 安德鲁·杨 ## Mentioned 安德鲁·杨（Andrew Yang）, 雅各布·博加奇（Jacob Bogage）, Noble Mobile, 路透社（Reuters）, Ai4, 佐兰·马姆达尼（Zohran Mamdani）, 哈桑·明哈吉（Hasan Minhaj）, 乔纳森·海特（Jonathan Haidt）, 《焦虑的一代》（The Anxious Generation）, 《杨，我的1000美元在哪里？》（Hey, Yang. Where's my thousand bucks?）, 前进党（Forward Party）, Verizon, Meta, Instagram, LinkedIn, 丽莎·穆尔科斯基（Lisa Murkowski）, 托德·阿基里斯（Todd Achilles）, 吉姆·里施（Jim Risch）, 塞思·博德纳（Seth Bodnar） ## Video description Andrew Yang - CEO, Noble Mobile Jacob Bogage - White House Correspondent, Reuters [Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUjEy6vE3jo)

Source quotes

[0:04] 安德鲁·杨（转述科技高管）: 我要裁掉 30% 到 50% 的员工，随后我会升职加薪。我心里很难过，但如果不这么做，董事会就会把我换掉。 [3:04] 安德鲁·杨: 来自未来、因为 AI 会吃掉所有工作而主张给大家发钱的神奇亚裔男子 [5:22] 安德鲁·杨: 解雇一个人最简单的方式，就是压根不去招他。 [5:22] 安德鲁·杨: 全行业准备在 AI 上砸下 3 万亿美元，但转头却向大家保证‘这绝不会影响你们的工作’——这完全不合逻辑。 [7:07] 安德鲁·杨: 必须想尽一切办法坐到真人面前喝咖啡。 [9:14] 雅各布·博加奇: Hey, Yang. Where's my thousand bucks?（杨，我的1000美元在哪里？） [10:58] 安德鲁·杨: 无论你是亿万富翁还是其他阶层，生活在地表总比躲在地下掩体强，开普通车总比开防弹车出行好。 [13:02] 哈桑·明哈吉（安德鲁·杨援引）: 悲伤长方形（rectangles of sadness） [13:02] 安德鲁·杨: 省下金钱，保护大脑。 [15:23] 安德鲁·杨: 万亿美元级别的科技巨头雇佣着全球最聪明的人才，靠着让孩子多巴胺上瘾来榨取数十亿美元利润，最后却说要靠父母去监督管控？这简直是疯了。

Source quotes

[0:04] Andrew Yang: they're nervous because they're smart. [0:04] Andrew Yang: AI is going to f*** me and mine. [2:58] Andrew Yang: magical Asian man from the future who wanted to give everyone money because AI was going to eat the jobs. [5:22] Andrew Yang: the easiest people to fire are those you have not hired yet [5:22] Andrew Yang: Hey, we're going to spend $3 trillion on AI, but it's not going to affect any of your jobs. [9:14] Jacob Bogage: Hey, Yang. Where's my thousand bucks? [9:14] Andrew Yang: Hey, Am I Racist or Are You Andrew Yang? [10:58] Andrew Yang: human-centered version of capitalism [10:58] Andrew Yang: it's better above ground than in the bunker [10:58] Andrew Yang: better without a bulletproof car than with a bulletproof [13:02] Hasan Minhaj: rectangles of sadness [13:02] Andrew Yang: the magical Asian man from the future who wants to give everyone money

Original transcript

[0:04] Hi everybody. I'm Jacob Bogage. I'm a White House correspondent at Reuters. I handle the economic [0:11] portfolio uh out of the Trump administration. But you're not here to see me. Uh you're here to see [0:16] Andrew Yang, the CEO of Noble Mobile and 2020 presidential candidate and all-around thinker [0:22] and doer. Um Andrew, let's start here. We are uh in a room full of AI optimists. At least I [0:30] think you all are AI optimists. Um I looked at some polling earlier today. The American people [0:36] generally don't trust AI. It has a very low approval rating. Um solid majorities feel like [0:42] it will make them worse at building relationships and creative thinking. Help us bridge that divide. [0:48] Why are we optimistic and in this room? And why are the American people nervous? [0:53] I think the American people are are nervous because they're smart, honestly. Uh uh I think the [0:59] people here also can be smart in the sense that you may benefit from AI. And so you're like, "Oh, [1:04] I'm working at this firm. I like it. It's going to make uh me more efficient, powerful, maybe make me [1:11] lots and lots of money perhaps." Um but but the average American is going to be be on the outside [1:17] looking in on this one and they know it. uh you know the I think there's a question here from [1:22] hey what's happening to the recent college grads I mean the underemployment rate now is near 50% for [1:28] a recent college grad. So, the average American's value prop is going to be like, "Okay, my kids are [1:34] going to be sent home to live with me. Uh, and I'm going to be worried about my job because AI [1:38] is going to replace call center workers, coders, drivers, marketers, researchers, like anything [1:45] that involves sitting at a computer and looking at a screen uh is likely to get automated over [1:52] time." And there are very, very significant tech companies that are in the midst of this process. [1:56] I'm the guy that CEOs call and say, "Hey, can we have lunch?" And they tell me, it's like, "I'm [2:02] going to fire 30, 40, 50% of my people. I'm going to get a raise. I'm going to get a bonus." I feel [2:07] bad about it. Um, but if I don't do this, they're going to replace me. And so, and then I'm like, [2:13] "Thank you for sharing this with me. Are you willing to share this publicly?" And they say, [2:16] "Of course not. That's why I called you to have this lunch with you to like, you know, you can [2:20] be my priest. Just pass along my phone number next time that happens." And yeah, sure thing. And you [2:25] can be like, "Listen in on it, Jacob." So, um, I mean, like, so the general summary for the average [2:31] American is like, uh, I feel like AI is going to [ __ ] me and mine. Um, and unfortunately, [2:39] that's going to become somewhat even quasi literal and that they're not going to be doing much like [2:44] actual dating and [laughter] they're going to wind up. Sorry folks, if you're just coming in, [2:50] we got some seats over here on my right and then also up front on the left here. Uh, and [2:55] if you haven't made a buddy yet, now is a great time to make a buddy. So, scoot over and let him [2:58] have a seat. Um, who's politically exploiting this gap and what's the consequences of that? I mean, [3:04] it has been fascinating for yours truly. So, check it out. I ran for president is the magical Asian [3:08] man from the future who wanted to give everyone money because I was going to eat the jobs. Um, [3:13] I won. That's why we're doing this from the White House. Um, the the uh current administration's [3:20] attitude has been like, "Hey guys, what do you need? we'll be your best friends. Uh, you know, [3:25] let let's go um as fast as possible. And then, interestingly, the Democrats were kind of mum [3:31] on it even as people went negative. And then the insurgent lefty type candidate started realizing, [3:38] wait a minute, this is like a really good issue for us. We can be like, no new data centers. Now, [3:42] I I spoke in Michigan last month and the people in Michigan, the economic planning types were [3:48] trying to get data centers in because they're really good sources of tax revenue. uh they're [3:52] they're they're competing with Ohio for those data centers. Uh but there's a lot of fear uh around [3:59] them and so it's become a political wedge issue. Um and I think in terms of who's exploiting it, [4:04] it's going to be the folks on the the left, but there are a lot of folks who are traditionally [4:09] conservative who also don't like data centers. Are the data centers are you picking up on that as a [4:15] traditional nimism issue? We don't want a giant hulking facility that can that hums 24/7 in our [4:24] community or are you picking up on the anti-data center sentiment as a larger fear of AI? Yeah, [4:31] the the things are tied together. So people think if you're going to bring a data center to my [4:36] community, it's going to mean higher power bills for me. U maybe some noise um and uh maybe like [4:42] less access to water because water is needed to to cool it. Um, so those are the downsides and then [4:48] what are the upsides? And it's kind of unclear. It's like someone's going to make money but not [4:53] you [laughter] is a general gist. So when I was in Michigan, one of the things I said is like look, [4:58] you have to distribute the goodies quick. You have to be like, hey guys, everyone in this radius like [5:04] free utilities for a year and and then people would be like, okay, like that's a thing. That's [5:08] real. Um, but other than that though, there's just a lot of mistrust in these communities. And [5:13] so they they see the downside, not the goods. Uh and then people can jin that up via social media. [5:22] The the panel before us was about largely about employment effects. You led off with [5:28] um CEOs calling you asking you to be their priest and say, "I'm going to fire 30% of [5:34] uh of my of my workforce." Um do you see a broader trend there? Do you see this industry specific? Do [5:43] you see it in certain types of workers? What what are what are they confessing to you? Um, yes. So, [5:49] first I do run a company called Noble Mobile and I want to talk about that. Yeah, I know. But I'm [5:53] just going to share that uh we have replaced junior engineer job postings and junior data [5:58] and analyst postings with AI because you know I can do it and you're like why am I hiring a [6:03] whippers snapper um for that. So uh the easiest people to fire are those you have not hired yet. [6:09] So if you look at what we have done at Noble and then extrapolate that across uh the economy, [6:16] you're looking at hundreds of thousands of unhired whippers snappers. Uh and that [6:20] is totally happening right now. Uh and now you have also the public companies who are who are, [6:27] you know, stroking their chin. Uh and in my opinion, they're going to jettison many many [6:32] uh white collar workers. We spend more money now on data centers than commercial office [6:36] buildings. Think about that. If there's any clearer metaphor for the fact that [6:40] the server and the AI are the new uh worker, I mean, that's it. Or when I was in Michigan, [6:46] I put it this way. It's pretty straightforward. Hey, we're going to spend $3 trillion on AI, [6:51] but it's not going to affect any of your jobs. That doesn't make any [ __ ] sense to anybody, [6:57] you know, you just put it out like that. And the Michiganers had this like collective groan because [7:02] like they they know it like they've they've seen wave after wave of this sort of thing. [7:07] uh a young person uh who I don't think is in this room um but maybe sees a video of this on [7:14] social media or hears you speak elsewhere um and listens to you and then sees some of the [7:21] same indicators that you're talking about. What do they need to know? What do you tell a young [7:27] person? What do you tell a whippers snapper whom you have not hired? All right. So, the go-to move [7:32] for whippers snapper is more schooling, [laughter] which is not necessarily the move, honestly. Like, [7:37] law school applications have gone up 21%. Um, and do not make me talk. And I am not pumped about [7:44] the prospects uh for those people three and a half years from now. Um, so that'd be my first piece of [7:50] advice is like look, [laughter] like more school won't solve your problem on this one. Uh, try and [7:55] avoid anything that's going to load debt on you. Uh, and then also assume that every resume you [8:02] send into the void will not be seen. Um, because at this point there are a lot of just AI to AI [8:08] job posting conversations happening. Um, a lot of weird [ __ ] on LinkedIn now like that. Like it's [8:13] all going kind of bizarre. So if you're a young person, what you have to do is you have to get in [8:18] front of a human being and make them have coffee with you. Um, and the way to do that is typically [8:24] to mine your parents' network uh or your friend's parents' networks. Uh, you know, I mean that that [8:30] is the only way. It's like if I'm not sitting with you having a a conversation, you're going [8:33] to you're going to ignore me. And by the way, like am I the recipient of this sort of thing, [8:38] which I mean I get a lot of stuff, so I ignore the vast majority of it, but like sometimes a friend [8:42] of mine will be like, "Hey, Andrew, like I'm an investor in your company. We're friends. Like [8:47] can you have coffee with my child?" and then you can't say no because you're a total jackass if you [8:53] do. You know what I mean? Um but then sometimes when you have coffee with a person, you're like, [8:57] "This person's actually kind of like bright, you know, like like I might even be able to find [9:02] something for them." So like that's what I would tell a young person is like, you know, do not [9:06] think that uh the electronic communications are actually reaching human eyes. You wrote a book, [9:14] which I have here. Hey, Yang. Where's my thousand bucks? So, my question to you, Andrew Yang, [9:22] is where's my thousand bucks? Uh, uh, it's it's on its way. Um, well, that's what we talked about. [9:31] Oh, no. The alternate title to the book, uh, was, "Hey, Am I racist or are you Andrew Yang?" [9:40] Which which I have gotten. Uh, thank you for not making me read that out on No problem, [9:45] man. No problem. I'm very considerate. So, so the uh the value is getting sucked up [9:50] into the cloud. And one of the things I want to suggest to folks is that there's now this [9:54] unprecedented vortex of AI, data processing power, and capital that's forming this uh like typhoon, [10:02] this whirlwind that's going to hoover up more and more of the value. The proportion of of gross [10:08] national income that goes to workers is now at 43%, the lowest level since 1929, and declining. [10:15] Like people who trade their time for money are going to lose particularly if the time they're [10:20] trading is based upon thinking being smart. You know there like the the there's this job [10:26] polarization impact that's going to happen that you're going to have top and bottom and the middle [10:31] is going to get wiped out. Um so that's where your thousands is going. Jake cool. um you ran [10:43] for president by by the way everyone's data is getting sold and resold for hundreds of billions [10:47] of dollars a year right now. So you want to talk about where your money's going like it that that's [10:52] and that was used to build the models and no one saw a dime. you ran for president talking a lot [10:58] about this, especially talking about the labor effects. Um, and a lot of your conversation, [11:02] my my stuff is aging pretty well now, huh? It's like people people are like, "Oh, wow." Yang. A [11:07] lot of Yeah, a lot of your conversation about universal basic income was based on this exact [11:12] phenomenon. The nearest place that's happening is in Mayor Zoran Mandani, New York. How's he doing? [11:20] What do you think of the way he's That's what a non sequator. Sorry. Go ahead. this [laughter] and [11:26] they took a sharp left turn there I feel well I don't know if it's a sharp left turn I think this [11:31] is this is a [laughter] that's fine this is a type of progressivism that's catching on in certain [11:36] places what do you make of how it's being executed you know so I I personally would draw a very very [11:40] large distinction between like um you know what what's happening in that version of um politics [11:47] and then and what I was proposing like I I'm proposing I still am proposing by the way like the [11:52] uh human- centered version of capitalism based on our flourishing, which would involve health and [11:58] wellness and caring and nurturing and caretaking and arts and creativity. Uh, and I I'm someone [12:04] who thinks that innovation is key to all of that and that as people succeed, it's a good thing as [12:10] long as that value actually is circulating in some kind of adequate way. Um, and it's anti-tribalist. [12:16] It's actually universalist. I think my biggest beef with some of what's going on in that version [12:21] of today's politics is that it tends to be very tribal. It tends to like double down on tribe, [12:26] even tribal in terms of saying, "Look, these economic winners are your enemies." It's like [12:30] they are not. You know what I mean? Like the system is not welldesigned. Like, and we have to [12:35] bring people to the table and be like, "Look, like you're a billionaire or whatever. Congratulations. [12:41] Uh like it's better above ground than in the bunker. it's better without a bulletproof car than [12:47] with a bulletproof, you know, it's just be like, look, it's just enlightened self-interest. Like, [12:51] let's let's bring it together. Um, but you don't start that conversation by saying it's all their [12:56] fault. It's all their fault. And I think that's what's happening. Let's talk about redesigning the [13:02] system a little bit and your work with Noble. Uh, Noble Mobile is pay-per-use model. Uh, [13:10] we talked about it when we prep for the session. users basically get rewarded for as as you say [13:16] not doom scrolling so much not using as much data. So talk to me about doomcrolling. What [13:21] are the consequences for our economy for our democracy? Whose responsibility is it to address [13:26] that problem? Um yeah so Hassan Minhaj calls our smartphones our rectangles of sadness and I want [13:32] you to think about it. It's actually a highly unusual experience for someone to come to you [13:36] and and scream in your face. That doesn't happen to most of us in real life. Um, but the digital [13:41] equivalent happens daily. [laughter] Maybe that not that's screaming at you, but you certainly [13:45] can tune into the screaming match. So, uh, Noble Mobile's trying to do two things at once. One is [13:51] trying to return money to you because the average American is spending $83 a month on their wireless [13:56] bill. I was spending over $150 on just my own line for Verizon. The average European is spending $35 [14:02] a month on their wireless bill. And the the gap between 35 and 83 times everyone is a hundred [14:08] billion dollars a year in spend on wireless connectivity which at this point is a total [14:14] commodity. It's like oxygen. So with Noble and by the way anyone here who wants to you can go [14:19] to nomobile.com/yang get three months for free try it like you know the rest of it. I'm still [14:23] the magical Asian man from the future who wants to give everyone money. So um but Noble Mobile will [14:28] cut your wireless bill to $42 uh a month or so. Um, it we won't gouge you when you travel abroad. [14:34] I sense there a lot of people who do that. Like on Verizon or AT&T, they charge you 10 or 12 bucks [14:38] a day. It it cost them $2 a day to put you on the foreign carriers network. So like they're they're [14:43] just shafting you. Um uh and if you don't use data in a given month, we'll give you the money back. [14:49] So it's like a friendly angel on your shoulder saying like, "Hey, like save the money, save [14:54] your brain." Uh and I'm happy to say with millions in revenue uh and uh growing every day. So, who's [15:02] respons I'm like I actually do real things. I'm like a real person. We look touch me. Go ahead, [15:09] Jacob. Yeah. Like not AI. It's real. Yes. I'd be like that. This is the time where like I take [15:16] off my like fake glove hand and I'm like a robot underneath. [snorts] We look at the issue of of [15:23] doom scrolling and the way AI generated content's proliferating online and the way algorithms are [15:28] feeding that to people. uh whose responsibility is it to help people unwind themselves from [15:34] that doomscrolling loop? I I think this is a collective action problem. And one thing that [15:38] pisses me off as a parent is when people would say it's like, "Oh, it's for parents to figure [15:42] out what your kids are doing on the phone." It's like, are you kidding me? You know, you you have [15:46] like the smartest people in the world in trillion dollar companies making billions of dollars off of [15:51] addicting my kids uh to, you know, dopamine hits and it's like up to me to police that. Like that's [15:56] madness. Um, and so there was a guy named Jonathan Height who wrote The Anxious Generation. Uh, [16:01] and he managed to inflame all of the parents um, to the point where now I think 40 states have said [16:08] no social media for kids below the age of of 15. Um, and I'm friends with John. I congratulated [16:14] him in New York and he's like it helps when you write a book that's like the number one issue for [16:18] like 50% of American parents. Um, but I'm going to suggest it should not take uh benign social [16:24] uh scientists to get our [ __ ] together, you know? I mean, like I was seeing the data on this [16:29] back in 2016, 2017 uh that Instagram and the like were depressing teenage girls in particular. Like [16:37] it it's really unconscionable what we've allowed to happen. And we're doing it again with uh with [16:42] AI because at this point, if there's one thing America will follow, it's the almighty dollar. [16:49] So it's a collective action is that that that has a role in government obviously [16:55] the [clears throat] way you talk about it's 100% government. I mean we've allowed this technology [16:58] to come and then just been like oh can't regulate it cuz don't understand it like they're too smart [17:03] for us. It's [ __ ] nonsense. Um it's why I ran for president. Like you know you'd be like hey [17:08] guys we kind of know this is not great. By the way Meta's internal document said it was depressing [17:13] teenage girls and then they just buried it. Oh god. You know, I mean, imagine having some real [17:18] leadership in this country where we can have that conversation, [laughter] you know? I mean, that [17:22] would actually be fun. Uh, Andrew, you talk like someone who um might continue to be interested in [17:30] electoral politics. I I And we should say Andrew ran as a Democrat in 2020. You are no longer a [17:38] Democrat. Yeah. Yeah. I started in I sit before you the co-founder and co-chair of the third [17:42] biggest political party in the country, uh, the Forward Party. uh because I don't think the two [17:47] parties are going to get it. Um by the way, that's actually a fairly low bar I just set. It's like we [17:52] are the third biggest party of the country by my just means that you know uh but 50% of Americans [17:59] now are independent and I'm going to suggest that both parties have been taken over corrupted like [18:05] uh you know been in shitified I mean like whatever whatever you want to say. Um and so [18:10] you need to have this new political movement arise u that is not as tribal or ideological um and is [18:19] solutionsoriented and and wants to to forge the grand bargain. And so if I have an opportunity to [18:24] bring that process uh to life like you know I'm definitely going to to have a long talk with my [18:31] wife about it. You could do me a real favor of making some news right now. No, don't do that. [18:39] Um, tell me about building Forward Party. Um, what that process has been like, what kind of reception [18:46] you've gotten from voters and Parish the thought, what kind of reception you've gotten from donors? [18:52] Uh, sure. So, again, we are the third biggest party in the country by resources right now. Um, [18:56] which just means we're better at fundraising than the Libertarians and the Greens, [18:59] which is like they're and they're really bad, like really bad. Um, but we have 79 elected [19:04] officials around the country. Uh, and this is a very big week for us. Um, but I just want to [19:09] paint a picture in a particular way. How many US senators would you need to have a fulcrum [19:14] in the middle that might be able to redefine American politics? How many senators would [19:18] you need? Probably two because you're looking at a 50/50 or 5149 Senate. So, if you had two, [19:26] all of a sudden, like, you know, it'd be like, "Hey guys, neither of you can do anything without [19:30] us and we're open for business." And one of them is probably already in the Senate. Her [19:34] name is Lisa Marowski and Alaska got rid of their party primaries in 2020. So, she's essentially [19:40] an independent now like, you know, and she also voted to impeach Trump. You can go into it. Um, [19:45] the second might be on the way from uh either Idaho or Montana um because in Idaho last week, [19:52] the Democratic candidate dropped out. And so, it's a one-on-one race between an 83year-old Republican [19:59] incumbent and my guy Todd Achilles. That's his real name, Todd Achilles. In the year of [20:05] the Odyssey, Todd Achilles is an independent army tank commander vet who's uh trying to [20:12] challenge Jim Rich. Um and they're pulling neck andneck. And then the other possibility is a guy [20:17] named Seth Bodnar who's running for US Senate in Montana who has raised 30 times more than the Dem [20:24] is raised the same amount as the Republican. And Seth Bodnar, first in his class from West Point, [20:29] airborne uh commander who jumped out of planes. Uh he's like Captain America in real life. So [20:34] if you have either Todd or Seth Win and you have two independent senators in the US Senate as of [20:41] uh January 2027 and then the Forward Party is the fulcrum. So again, I'm a real person. I do [20:48] real [ __ ] Like we're working on things. Uh and if you do want to help in any way, [20:52] you can just go to andrewyang.com. I send out a newsletter to hundreds of thousands of people [20:57] trying to point you uh in these directions. And you can save money on your your wireless bill, [21:02] too. Friends, we're out of time. I told you we were going to have some fun. Thanks so much. Thank [21:08] you guys. It's great to be you all to go build a future that includes human beings. Thank you.