Y Combinator
Premature sales automation masks why outreach fails, leaving founders blind to targeting errors until they manually test prospects and harvest language directly from customers.
AI-assisted summary of Why You're Getting Zero Replies To Your Cold Emails — original source. Check the original for full context.
Source published:
Key ideas
- Premature automation masks the root causes of outbound failure; YC Visiting Partner Christina Gilbert advises founders to execute at least their first 100 outreaches manually to learn which targets and hooks actually convert. (0:38)
- Prospect and company targeting consistently trump copywriting—auditing who champions deals, who owns the budget, and observable intent signals like open job descriptions or a 100-to-500-employee headcount window prevents pitching the wrong inbox. (1:25)
- High-converting cold emails stay between five and eight sentences, restrict the product explanation to a single sentence, address executive career incentives rather than technical features, and close with a concrete, low-friction call to action. (4:25)
- A baseline of two to three replies per 100 emails is enough to iterate, and troubleshooting low response rates requires checking persona, company fit, and subject lines before rewriting body copy or diagnosing a deeper product-market fit issue. (8:56)
Detailed notes
## Background Published by Y Combinator on YouTube on September 12, 2026, this guide features YC Visiting Partner and OneSchema founder Christina Gilbert diagnosing why startup founders struggle to get responses to cold outreach. Drawing from her experience closing millions in founder-led sales, the presentation outlines eight core strategies to fix outbound pipeline generation before turning to automation.
## TL;DR Christina Gilbert explains that premature automation ruins outbound sales by depriving founders of actionable feedback on why their outreach is failing. Instead, founders should execute at least their first 100 outreaches manually, prioritizing precise persona targeting and high-stakes incentive alignment over perfectly polished copy. High-converting cold messages keep technical details minimal, focus on executive business pain, leverage observable intent signals, and adopt a conversational, peer-to-peer tone. When campaigns underperform, founders must systematically troubleshoot targeting and deliverability before touching copy, ultimately using verbatim language harvested from discovery calls to accelerate responses.
## Atmosphere & style The presentation carries the brisk, tactical, and no-nonsense tone of an intensive Y Combinator office hours session. Gilbert speaks with the empathetic authority of a seasoned operator, validating the emotional exhaustion of the outbound grind while systematically deconstructing common founder excuses. Watching the video feels like receiving a candid, high-leverage audit from a peer who has personally endured the slog and understands how to turn an ignored inbox into a repeatable revenue engine.
## Bulletin - [00:38](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=38s) Premature automation masks the root causes of outbound failure; YC Visiting Partner Christina Gilbert advises founders to execute at least their first 100 outreaches manually to learn which targets and hooks actually convert. - [01:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=85s) Prospect and company targeting consistently trump copywriting—auditing who champions deals, who owns the budget, and observable intent signals like open job descriptions or a 100-to-500-employee headcount window prevents pitching the wrong inbox. - [04:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=265s) High-converting cold emails stay between five and eight sentences, restrict the product explanation to a single sentence, address executive career incentives rather than technical features, and close with a concrete, low-friction call to action. - [08:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=536s) A baseline of two to three replies per 100 emails is enough to iterate, and troubleshooting low response rates requires checking persona, company fit, and subject lines before rewriting body copy or diagnosing a deeper product-market fit issue.
## Key takeaways - [00:38](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=38s) Blasting 1,000 automated emails with zero replies yields zero actionable feedback on whether the failure stemmed from targeting, messaging, or deliverability; founders should complete at least 100 manual outreaches first. - [01:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=85s) Pinpoint targeting always outperforms flawless copywriting because even the best-written email will fail if sent to roles lacking the relevant pain point, authority, or budget. - [02:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=143s) Founders can identify high-converting job titles by auditing past deals to see who championed and paid for the contract, or by evaluating who inside an organization has the most to gain or lose from adopting the product. - [03:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=187s) Because tools like LinkedIn Sales Navigator frequently return false-positive categories, founders must manually verify company fit and look for intent signals such as job postings and headcount inflection points. - [04:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=265s) Effective cold messages address what gets an executive promoted or fired rather than technical specifications like backend architecture, confining the core product explanation to a single sentence. - [04:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=265s) Cold emails should be tightly edited to five to eight sentences (and LinkedIn messages to two to five sentences) and wrap with a specific scheduling question rather than vague inquiries. - [06:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=360s) High-performing outbound—exemplified by YC startup Apten—uses a conversational peer-to-peer tone, establishes fast domain credibility, references visible account context, and pitches a low-risk experiment. - [07:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=439s) Short, curiosity-inducing subject lines like 'broken agents' paired with an optimized 20-to-30-character body preview snippet outperform generic corporate marketing copy. - [07:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=477s) Because prospects inspect senders before replying, founders should treat their LinkedIn banner as a jargon-free billboard, cut irrelevant personal hobbies from their bio, and max out daily connection requests within their target persona. - [08:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=536s) When debugging reply rates below the two-to-three percent baseline, founders must verify person targeting, company fit, and subject lines first before rewriting body copy, auditing website and LinkedIn collateral, checking spam deliverability, or suspecting a product-market fit problem. - [09:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=584s) Effective outbound cadences require two to four follow-ups ending in a polite 'breakup email' that gives permission to say no, paired with immediate responsiveness whenever a lead replies because delay kills deals. - [10:36](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=636s) Because cold prospecting is emotionally taxing and easy to procrastinate, founders need to define daily message quotas, block dedicated calendar time, and use co-founder accountability to ensure execution. - [11:20](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=680s) Asking prospects on discovery calls what caught their attention allows founders to harvest verbatim customer language for future campaigns, while doing manual outbound compounds domain intuition that outsourced agencies cannot replicate.
## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=0s) Start Manual Before You Automate
Founders frequently enter sales office hours wondering why their outreach has completely stalled. Christina Gilbert, Visiting Partner at Y Combinator and founder of OneSchema—where she personally generated and closed millions in revenue through founder-led sales—notes that the most common blunder is premature automation. Founders configure an automated pipeline tool, blast out a thousand identical emails into the void, and receive precisely zero replies. The fundamental flaw in this spray-and-pray approach is epistemic: when an unconsidered, fully automated campaign falls flat, the founder learns absolutely nothing about why it failed. Was it the messaging? Was it poor company targeting, bad prospect selection, email deliverability issues, or a weak subject line? Blasting automated volume masks the root cause of failure.
To build an outbound engine that actually works, founders should manually execute at least their first 100 outreaches before writing a single automation script or launching a sequencer. In practice, finding true product-market resonance often requires well over a hundred manual touches. Outreaching "by hand" demands deep, individual focus on each prospect. A founder must visit the prospect's LinkedIn profile, research their company, understand their specific operational headaches, and consider what exact phrasing would catch their attention. Conducting this research manually is the only way founders discover their highest-converting sales hooks and angles.
- **The trap of automation**: Blasting 1,000 automated emails with zero replies yields zero actionable data on deliverability, targeting, or copy. - **The manual baseline**: Complete at least 100 manual outreaches per prospect, analyzing one individual at a time. - **The research workflow**: Inspect each prospect's LinkedIn profile, examine company context, and isolate the exact problem they face.
---
[01:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=85s) Targeting Beats Perfect Messaging
Founders regularly spend hours obsessively rewriting sentence structures and polishing cold copy while paying almost no attention to the person receiving the note. Cold outbound is like searching for a needle in a haystack: if the recipient does not actively experience the specific pain point being solved, even the most eloquently crafted email will fall completely flat. Gilbert recalls a founder from a YC Winter batch selling a backend infrastructure tool intended for senior engineering leadership. When reviewing his outreach pipeline on LinkedIn, she discovered he was pitching DevRel managers, go-to-market managers, and even customer success managers. He had dispatched hundreds of emails wondering why no one responded, blind to the reality that those roles lacked the authority, context, or budget to ever consider buying an infrastructure product.
The fastest way to identify high-probability job titles is to audit existing customer histories. Founders should dissect previous wins: who drove the contract over the finish line, who signed on the dotted line, and who owned the budget? Outreach should immediately prioritize professionals with matching profiles or titles that previously replied to initial outbound tests. For pre-revenue founders with zero closed deals and no replies, the key evaluation criterion is determining who inside an organization stands to gain the most—or lose the most—from adopting the product.
```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Prospect Targeting Decision Framework accDescr: Flowchart illustrating how to select high-converting buyer personas versus personas with negative incentives.
subgraph Evaluation["Evaluate Organizational Incentives"] A["Who has the most to gain or lose?"] --> B["High-Stakes Stakeholder"] A --> C["Misaligned Stakeholder"] end
subgraph Outcomes["Targeting Outcome"] B --> D["E.g., CISO facing career risk from data breaches<br/>Strong Target"] C --> E["E.g., Engineering Manager avoiding employee monitoring<br/>Poor Target"] end ```
- **Targeting primacy**: Pinpoint targeting always outperforms flawless copywriting sent to the wrong job titles. - **Customer forensics**: Trace past deals to see who championed the tool, who signed the agreement, and who paid the invoice. - **Incentive alignment**: Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs) care deeply about device monitoring because a security breach could cost them their job, whereas engineering managers might actively resist employee surveillance on their teams.
---
[03:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=187s) Company Selection and Intent Signals
Targeting errors extend beyond job titles into company categorization. Filters in tools like LinkedIn Sales Navigator frequently return false positives. For instance, searching for general "tech companies" inevitably pulls in dozens of IT implementation consultancies rather than product-led software vendors. Founders must manually inspect and verify each prospective account rather than trusting raw filter exports. Reaching out without verifying company fit guarantees that the value proposition falls on deaf ears.
As outbound volume progresses, founders must actively uncover "intent signals"—concrete, observable indicators that an account urgently needs their tool right now. Public job descriptions serve as an exceptional window into an organization's shifting internal priorities and tech stack investments. Company headcount changes represent another vital signal. For example, a startup selling compensation planning software has little value for an early-stage team under 100 employees that does not yet use formalized leveling. Conversely, an enterprise with more than 500 employees likely already has established compensation bands and entrenched tooling. The inflection point between 100 and 500 employees serves as the prime intent signal where compensation planning software becomes an urgent necessity.
- **Account vetting**: Do not blindly rely on Sales Navigator categories; verify company fit individually. - **Job posting signals**: Read open hiring listings to determine organizational priorities, emerging initiatives, and tool dependencies. - **Headcount inflection points**: Identify the operational size where your solution transforms from unnecessary to indispensable. - **Exhausting warm networks**: Before relying entirely on cold outreach, "shake the tree" across personal contacts, friends, family, investors, former roommates, and casual acquaintances, where conversion rates are exponentially higher.
---
[04:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=265s) Crafting a Message Worth Reading
The primary objective of an outbound message is to deliver a crisp, unambiguous explanation of how the product helps the recipient. Founders must focus squarely on the top three anxieties keeping the prospective buyer awake at night: what gets them fired, what earns them a promotion, and why they should believe the sender can deliver results. When an executive reads an email and immediately recognizes, "That's exactly the problem that I have. They really get it," they will frequently book an introductory call even before fully grasping or trusting the technical mechanics of the software.
Founders routinely fall into the trap of detailing technical specifications that executives do not care about. C-suite leaders do not care about blazing-fast file uploads or backend architecture built in Rust; they care about hitting their quarterly business targets. The core product explanation should take up no more than a single sentence, leaving deep technical workflows for the live discovery call. To build immediate credibility, founders should highlight recognizable client logos or outline a distinct founder background that demonstrates domain mastery. The email must wrap with a frictionless, concrete call to action rather than vague inquiries like "Does this sound interesting?"
- **Executive pain vs. features**: Executives evaluate solutions based on hitting quarterly goals, not whether an underlying database is coded in Rust. - **Single-sentence pitch**: Confine the product description to one concise sentence; save technical walkthroughs for the call. - **Establishing credibility**: Mention notable brand names currently using the product or cite specific past operational experience. - **Definitive call to action (CTA)**: Ask specific questions such as "Got 20 minutes to hop on a call this week?" and include a calendar link or explicit time options. - **Length constraints**: Keep emails tightly edited between five to eight sentences; keep LinkedIn direct messages between two and five sentences.
---
[06:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=360s) Deconstructing a Cold Email That Works
Gilbert highlights a cold email sent by the founder of Apten (a YC Summer 2024 batch company) as an exemplary model of high-converting outbound. The message succeeds by opening with a conversational, peer-to-peer tone stripped of corporate jargon and exaggerated self-importance, reading naturally like a note from an industry colleague.
The founder builds immediate credibility right away: "I used to be a software engineer at Tesla. We got crazy good at using SMS to convert the people who visited our website into car buyers." In two brief sentences, he establishes domain expertise at a prominent enterprise and ties it directly to the exact commercial outcome he delivers.
The email also incorporates tailored account personalization by noting that the prospect collects phone numbers during their signup flow. Crucially, the founder avoids wasting sentences describing the mechanics of the software platform. Instead, he drives straight to a focused, experimental proposition: "Would you be open to an experiment to see if we could improve your conversion rate by using AI to reactivate leads?" This phrasing lowers the psychological barrier to entry, framing the engagement as an actionable trial rather than a heavyweight software purchase.
- **Peer-to-peer framing**: Drop bloated corporate jargon to sound like an approachable industry colleague. - **Fast proof of competence**: Point to concrete prior successes solving the exact same bottleneck at recognized companies. - **Contextual personalization**: Reference distinct operational attributes already visible on the prospect's public website or product flow. - **Low-friction CTA**: Pitch a low-risk "experiment" around lead reactivation and conversion lifts rather than demanding an immediate software evaluation.
---
[07:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=439s) Subject Lines and LinkedIn Profile Optimization
Writing effective email subject lines requires analyzing how messages appear inside an inbox. Founders must scrutinize both the subject line and the initial 20 to 30 characters of the email body, as that snippet populates the Gmail preview window. Unorthodox, direct, or slightly unusual subject lines regularly outperform formal enterprise copy. In one instance, a company deploying an agent product found that the punchy, curious subject line "broken agents" generated far higher open and response rates than the polished but generic "better agents for every workflow."
When running outbound on LinkedIn, the sender's profile serves the exact same role as an email subject line. Prospects glance at the sender's headline and avatar before deciding whether to accept a connection request or read an InMail. At a minimum, founders must include a clean, professional profile photo to prove they are legitimate human operators and immediately cultivate baseline trust.
- **Preview optimization**: Optimize the first 20 to 30 characters of the body copy to complement the subject line in email clients. - **Counter-intuitive subject lines**: Concise, curiosity-inducing subject lines like "broken agents" out-convert predictable marketing copy. - **LinkedIn profile credibility**: A verified, human profile picture is the baseline prerequisite for prospects deciding whether to accept a message.
[07:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=477s) Optimizing LinkedIn and Building Mutual Connections
Prospective buyers almost always research the sender behind a cold outreach, making a founder's LinkedIn presence a vital conversion surface. The header banner at the top of a personal profile should be treated like an advertisement for the company, featuring a clear, concise explanation of what the business actually does while stripping away all industry buzzwords. Similarly, the one-line headline and the "About" section must be rewritten into concise summaries matching the clarity of the banner. Founders need to ruthlessly curate their profiles to elevate the specific, impressive experience that buyers actually care about, eliminating lengthy personal anecdotes, hobbies, and irrelevant background details that distract potential customers from understanding how the founder can help them solve their immediate problems.
Beyond profile aesthetics, building a strong network of shared connections serves as the highest-leverage lever on LinkedIn. Mutual connections represent the single biggest predictor of whether an executive or prospect accepts an incoming connection request. Because professionals within the same industry and buyer persona are closely networked with one another, founders should systematically target and connect with peers in their ideal customer profile. Building this network takes deliberate persistence, so founders should turn maxing out their daily connection allowance into a non-negotiable routine.
- **Banner as Ad Space:** Turn the profile banner into a crisp, jargon-free visual billboard highlighting the core company value proposition. - **Ruthless Profile Editing:** Cut out irrelevant hobbies and non-business tangents from the "About" section; buyers skim quickly to see how your background proves you can solve their problem. - **Connection Maximums:** Make it a daily ritual to exhaust LinkedIn connection limits with people who fit the target persona, compounding social proof and acceptance rates across that cohort.
---
[08:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=536s) Debugging Low Reply Rates and Diagnosing PMF
Founders should not despair if initial reply rates are modest. Gathering just two to three replies out of 100 emails sent provides a solid baseline for rapid iteration. When diagnosing why an outbound campaign is underperforming, debugging must follow a strict diagnostic hierarchy rather than immediately rewriting the email copy. Most founders jump to tweaking paragraphs first, but messaging flaws rarely matter if the email landed in the wrong inbox. The first check is verifying whether the recipient is the correct persona, followed by confirming that the target company fits the profile. Only after confirming both target filters and ensuring the subject lines are generating opens should a founder inspect the email body copy itself.
```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Outbound Debugging Hierarchy accDescr: Systematic troubleshooting sequence for cold outbound campaigns before assuming a product-market fit problem.
subgraph Targeting["Targeting & Delivery"] P["1. Right Person"] --> C["2. Right Company"] C --> S["3. Subject Line Quality"] end
subgraph Content["Copy & Social Proof"] S --> M["4. Message Body Copy"] M --> W["5. Collateral & Profiles<br/>(Website, LinkedIn)"] W --> D["6. Deliverability & Spam"] end
D -->|"All 6 check out, but still 0 replies"| PMF["Deeper Product-Market Fit Issue"] ```
If targeting, subject lines, and body copy look sound, the next checkpoint is external collateral—evaluating whether the startup's website and founder LinkedIn profiles appear credible and trustworthy. The final technical check is email deliverability to ensure messages are not landing directly in spam folders. When a founder systematically evaluates all six areas, finds no glaring deficiencies, and still experiences zero replies, the problem is no longer outbound mechanics. At that stage, prolonged silence is usually a structural signal pointing toward a deeper lack of product-market fit.
---
[09:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=584s) The Follow-Up Cadence, Breakup Emails, and Speed to Lead
A single cold email is almost never enough because busy decision-makers routinely miss messages or clear their inboxes in a rush. Effective outbound requires sending two to four follow-up emails, spaced out over several days. The final touchpoint in the cadence should always be a polite "breakup email." Framing the message with a low-pressure off-ramp—such as, *"Since I haven't heard back, it seems like sales tax automation isn't a priority for you right now, just let me know and I can spare your inbox"*—consistently yields surprisingly high response rates. Giving prospects permission to say no relieves pressure, and a clear, definitive rejection is far more valuable than silence because aggregated negative signals help founders sharpen their targeting criteria for future outreach.
Once an interested prospect does respond, the founder must transition immediately into rapid execution. Christina Gilbert emphasizes that founders must act like a "heat-seeking missile" where nothing is allowed to delay getting that lead onto the calendar. In early-stage sales, delay is fatal: every founder inevitably learns the agonizing lesson that "time kills deals," and maintaining lightning-fast responsiveness protects hard-won momentum before the prospect's attention drifts away.
- **Cadence Depth:** Send 2 to 4 follow-ups spaced a few days apart rather than abandoning a lead after a single ignored touchpoint. - **The Breakup Email:** Offer a gracious exit to provoke a response; high reply rates stem from removing the conversational pressure to buy. - **Speed to Lead:** Treat incoming replies with extreme urgency; any friction or delay in booking the meeting dramatically lowers close rates.
---
[10:36](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=636s) Time Blocking and Accountability for Outbound
One of the most frequent traps early-stage founders fall into is failing to protect dedicated time for sales. Outbound prospecting is emotionally taxing, repetitive, and often ranks as the least enjoyable task on a founder's plate. As a result, founders will latch onto almost any other administrative or product distraction to justify putting off cold outreach. The only reliable antidote is creating a rigorous, concrete execution schedule rather than relying on willpower.
Founders must clearly define the parameters of their daily outreach: deciding exactly how many messages will be dispatched per day, estimating the time required per personalized note, and scheduling a precise time slot on the calendar to execute. While calendar-blocking individual outreach hours might feel like extreme micromanagement, it creates an essential forcing function. Enlisting a co-founder for mutual accountability can make the difference between sustained pipeline generation and stalled growth, as the ultimate divider between founders who succeed in outbound and those who fail is simply following through on the daily volume they committed to achieve.
---
[11:20](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=680s) Customer-Driven Copy and the Compounding Founder Slog
The highest-performing sales copy does not originate from clever brainstorms with friends, advisers, or co-founders; it comes directly from the mouths of paying customers. Founders can systematically harvest high-converting copy by opening discovery calls with a direct question: *"What got your attention about my message?"* Prospects will readily point out the exact phrasing or value propositions that resonated with their reality. This technique serves a dual purpose: it isolates winning lines for future cold templates and prompts the buyer to speak openly and candidly about their underlying operational problems right at the start of the call.
```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: Customer-Driven Copy Feedback Loop accDescr: Process of capturing customer language on sales calls to improve future outbound targeting and messaging.
A["Discovery Call Question:<br/>'What caught your attention?'"] --> B["Identify Winning Hooks & Exact Phrasing"] B --> C["Interview Existing Customers:<br/>'Single reason you bought?'"] C --> D["Inject Verbatim Phrasing into Cold Outbound"] D --> E["Higher Reply Rates & Better Discovery"] E --> A ```
Similarly, founders should query existing happy customers to identify the single deciding factor that convinced them to sign the contract, weaving those exact terms and pain descriptions into ongoing email campaigns. As Gilbert notes, "Your customers are always going to write better copy than you do."
While sending thousands of manual cold messages is an indisputable slog, being a founder is the ultimate competitive superpower in sales. Agencies and outsourced SDRs lack the context to diagnose customer realities on the fly. Doing the manual work compounds intuition over time: a founder learns to glance at a company's job posting and instantly recognize their operational bottlenecks, or instinctively understands why pitching Pain Point A resonates with small businesses while Pain Point B lands with enterprise accounts. Outbound only gets easier as this domain knowledge accumulates, laying the groundwork to close game-changing deals.
## Notable quotes > [03:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=187s) shake the tree — Christina Gilbert
> [04:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=265s) That's exactly the problem that I have. They really get it — Christina Gilbert
> [04:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=265s) Got 20 minutes to hop on a call this week? — Christina Gilbert
> [06:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=360s) I used to be a software engineer at Tesla. We got crazy good at using SMS to convert the people who visited our website into car buyers. — Apten Founder
> [06:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=360s) Would you be open to an experiment to see if we could improve your conversion rate by using AI to reactivate leads? — Apten Founder
> [07:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=439s) broken agents
> [09:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=584s) Since I haven't heard back, it seems like sales tax automation isn't a priority for you right now, just let me know and I can spare your inbox — Christina Gilbert
> [09:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=584s) heat-seeking missile — Christina Gilbert
> [09:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=584s) time kills deals — Christina Gilbert
> [11:20](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=680s) What got your attention about my message? — Christina Gilbert
> [11:20](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0&t=680s) Your customers are always going to write better copy than you do. — Christina Gilbert
## Mentioned Christina Gilbert, Y Combinator, OneSchema, Apten, Tesla, LinkedIn, LinkedIn Sales Navigator, Gmail, Rust
## Video description The best outbound starts before you automate anything. Founders need to learn who actually has the problem, what gets their attention, and what makes them reply. YC Visiting Partner Christina Gilbert recommends doing at least your first 100 outreaches by hand so you can learn those things yourself.
Drawing from her experience generating and closing millions of dollars through founder-led sales at OneSchema, Christina shares eight ways founders can improve their outbound, from targeting the right people and writing emails worth reading to following up, debugging low reply rates, and using customer language to sharpen your message.
Chapters: 00:00 - Intro 00:38 - Start manual before you automate 01:25 - Targeting beats perfect messaging 02:23 - How to find the right job titles 03:07 - Picking the right companies 03:47 - Intent signals 04:25 - Craft a message worth reading 06:00 - A cold email that works 07:19 - Subject lines 07:37 - Improve your LinkedIn profile 08:47 - What your reply rates are telling you 09:47 - Follow up, and reply fast 10:37 - Block out time for outbound 11:25 - Use the messaging from your customers 12:27 - Your slog compounds
Apply to Y Combinator: https://www.ycombinator.com/apply Work at a startup: https://www.ycombinator.com/jobs
[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr6PMD06hP0)