Meservey Tells Tech Founders to Bypass Press and Own Their Stories
David Senra
Traditional public relations distorts breakthrough technologies, requiring startup founders to bypass media intermediaries and communicate conviction directly to their target audiences.
Lulu Cheng Meservey advises only 10 to 12 tech founders at a time through Rostra, rejecting traditional corporate PR in favor of building movement-oriented communications for counterintuitive breakthroughs. (2:08)
The 'Go Direct' doctrine originated at Anduril when hostile tech press forced Palmer Luckey and his team to bypass media intermediaries and demonstrate defense tech directly to military and intelligence operators. (23:00)
Meservey warns that AI leaders are alienating the public by nonchalantly forecasting job displacement; instead, tech should be framed as ambient infrastructure with humans cast as the heroes. (33:23)
In an ecosystem saturated with bot-driven engagement and templated AI slop, Meservey argues durable advantage lies in 'un-fakeable' signals: distinct personal taste, real-world hospitality, and craftsmanship. (49:25)
Detailed notes
## Background
This interview was published by David Senra on YouTube on August 12, 2026. The episode details the career and philosophy of Lulu Cheng Meservey, founder of Rostra and high-stakes communications strategist behind companies like Anduril, Shopify, and Cognition, who advocates abandoning traditional PR to build direct, founder-led narrative sovereignty.
## TL;DR
Communications strategist Lulu Cheng Meservey outlines her counterinsurgency-inspired approach to corporate storytelling, arguing that conventional PR is broken and that high-conviction founders must bypass legacy media gatekeepers to communicate directly with their core audiences. Drawing from her work with Palmer Luckey at Anduril and tech leaders across Silicon Valley, she explains how AI leaders are alienating the public by making technology the protagonist rather than ambient infrastructure that empowers humans. Alongside host David Senra, Meservey makes the case for originality, timeless aesthetics, and relentless self-conviction, warning against synthetic bot campaigns and templated messaging in favor of craft and authentic human connection.
## Atmosphere & style
The conversation carries an intense, high-energy intellectual charge, blending tactical founder advisory with the rigor of military history and classical rhetoric. Senra brings his characteristic historical fervor and passionate defense of capitalism, while Meservey provides razor-sharp strategic principles softened by dry, self-deprecating wit. It feels less like a standard business interview and more like an intimate, high-signal war room session on narrative warfare, cultural taste, and conviction.
## Bulletin
- [02:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=128s) Lulu Cheng Meservey advises only 10 to 12 tech founders at a time through Rostra, rejecting traditional corporate PR in favor of building movement-oriented communications for counterintuitive breakthroughs.
- [23:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=1380s) The 'Go Direct' doctrine originated at Anduril when hostile tech press forced Palmer Luckey and his team to bypass media intermediaries and demonstrate defense tech directly to military and intelligence operators.
- [33:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=2003s) Meservey warns that AI leaders are alienating the public by nonchalantly forecasting job displacement; instead, tech should be framed as ambient infrastructure with humans cast as the heroes.
- [49:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=2965s) In an ecosystem saturated with bot-driven engagement and templated AI slop, Meservey argues durable advantage lies in 'un-fakeable' signals: distinct personal taste, real-world hospitality, and craftsmanship.
## Key takeaways
- [06:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=378s) Movement-building communication is essential for non-obvious, counterintuitive companies to overcome entrenched industry skepticism and rally high-conviction believers.
- [11:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=702s) Early-stage startups function like asymmetric insurgencies, overcoming massive material and institutional disadvantages through raw intensity of belief and operational manifestos.
- [18:47](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=1127s) Founders must maintain 'narrative sovereignty' by going direct to target audiences rather than outsourcing their story to legacy media middlemen who dilute or distort unconventional ideas.
- [26:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=1605s) Going direct does not require theatrical charisma; technical and introverted founders succeed if they possess unassailable technical conviction and authentic mission alignment.
- [30:17](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=1817s) Persuasion radiates in concentric circles originating from self-persuasion: leaders must completely convince themselves before they can effectively rally teams and audiences.
- [31:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=1890s) Silicon Valley chronically over-indexes on engineering while under-investing in human alignment, mistakenly assuming that building a product automatically guarantees adoption.
- [33:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=2003s) AI leaders suffer from poor public trust because they frame technology as an unstoppable force rolling over people, rather than empowering humans as the protagonists.
- [40:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=2440s) According to 'The Jetsons rule', technology is most persuasive when kept ambient in the background while human agency and everyday life remain in the foreground.
- [43:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=2591s) Analogies like Steve Jobs's 'bicycle for the mind' succeed by translating complex technical features into intuitive user transformations grounded in familiar mental models.
- [45:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=2730s) Shopify builds durable goodwill by treating its e-commerce infrastructure as ambient plumbing while elevating independent merchants as the true heroes of the story.
- [49:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=2965s) Founders should avoid synthetic bot engagement and prioritize things that cannot be faked, such as high-taste aesthetics, care, and genuine signal with high-value individuals.
- [57:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=3431s) Relying on templates and corporate boilerplate produces generic content worth fractions of a cent per token, forfeiting the unique texture where founder alpha lives.
- [01:07:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=4034s) Storytelling frameworks from sports like UFC and Formula 1 show that mass persuasion succeeds when complex technical domains are absorbed as byproducts of compelling human drama.
- [01:12:29](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=4349s) Humans innately crave narrative coherence; if founders do not proactively provide the connective tissue between company milestones, audiences will invent their own narratives.
## Detailed walkthrough
### [00:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=2s) From Rural China to Naturalized American
Lulu Cheng Meservey recounts her origins in rural China, born in a small village where even basic medical knowledge was sparse—her mother did not know whether she would have a boy or a girl, or whether the pregnancy would last six or twelve months. The family was able to leave China when her father was selected to earn his PhD in astrophysics in Germany. At the time, the demand to emigrate drastically outstripped the number permitted to leave, meaning Lulu and her mother were technically meant to remain behind in China as collateral to guarantee her father's return.
Against those expectations, the family reunited in Germany at the University of Heidelberg. From there, her father's research at various university observatories dictated their path, eventually taking them to the University of Oslo in Norway, where Lulu spent a significant part of her childhood attending local public schools and "became a little bit Norwegian." The family subsequently migrated to Canada—where they gained Canadian citizenship, a moment of profound gratitude and welcome—before Lulu finally pursued the ultimate destination: the United States. She arrived in America for college and later naturalized during the first Trump administration, fulfilling what she describes as a multi-generational dream that her father had originally harbored.
- **Countries lived in:** China, Germany, Norway, Canada, and the United States.
- **Father's academic focus:** Astrophysics research at institutions including the University of Heidelberg and the University of Oslo.
- **American Dream:** Moving to the United States was the inherited ambition of multiple generations; Germany had been chosen only because the US quota was oversubscribed when her father first applied.
---
[02:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=128s) Learning to Read the Room: From Rabbit Costumes to Job Interviews
David Senra highlights Lulu's unique standing in corporate strategy: she works with only 10 to 12 elite tech founders at a time, backed by an overwhelming waitlist, running an advisory model that essentially did not exist before her. Lulu reflects that because her current vocation had no precedent, she could not have planned for it in college. Instead, her childhood as a perennial outsider—constantly moving, speaking with an odd accent, and wearing foreign clothes—forced her to develop an acute survival mechanism: hyper-attuning to group dynamics, reading the unspoken cues, and learning to speak in a way that would allow the room to accept her.
When she arrived in Canada, she tried teaching herself English using a physical textbook titled *English* with a green-and-blue pattern resembling a Greyhound bus seat. Emerging like Neo unplugged from *The Matrix*, she mistakenly thought she knew the language. The gap between textbook grammar and real-world idiom caught up with her in college during a BCG-style consulting interview. Asked about her background, she replied, "Yeah, I have had quite a bit of experience below the belt"—confusing "below the belt" with "under my belt." The interview ended poorly, but it cemented her obsession with the subtle textures and high stakes of vocabulary.
She traces the origins of that vigilance back to Oslo, where she attended *møteklassen*—a transitional welcome class for non-Norwegian-speaking immigrants. In late October, having discussed Halloween and knowing how the holiday was celebrated in the American tradition, Lulu arrived at school dressed in a full-body rabbit costume, complete with furry ears, gloves, and a tail. To her horror, no one else was dressed up; the custom was not observed at school in Norway. She was forced to sit at her desk all day attempting to write with oversized rabbit paws, learning early that unspoken cultural assumptions can lead to jarring public exposure if not properly navigated.
---
[06:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=378s) Building a Movement for Counterintuitive Bets
When asked how she defines her work to an outsider, Lulu explains that she does not run standard public relations; she helps founders "build a movement to help their company succeed." For a company building the seventh generic B2B SaaS product in a crowded sector, traditional comms may suffice, but that kind of work offers her little excitement. Movement-building is required when a founder pursues something truly novel, counterintuitive, and ambitious—citing companies like Anduril, Ramp, or General Matter.
Because non-obvious breakthroughs run counter to established conventions, founders cannot rely on passive acceptance. They must shatter existing industry and societal biases to attract top talent and loyal backers away from safe, lucrative alternatives. Success depends on rallying a coalition of believers who are willing to say no to great traditional options in order to embark on a shared mission.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: The Mechanics of Movement-Building Communications
accDescr: Diagram illustrating how contrarian founders build movements to overcome conventional industry resistance.
subgraph Challenge["The Founder's Dilemma"]
A["Counterintuitive Breakthrough"] --> B["Entrenched Biases & Skepticism"]
B --> C["High Opportunity Cost for Talent"]
end
subgraph Strategy["Movement-Building Comms"]
C --> D["Shape Unspoken Context"]
D --> E["Articulate Shared Quest"]
end
subgraph Outcome["The Result"]
E --> F["Rally Mission-Driven Believers"]
F --> G["Category Creation & Enduring Value"]
end
```
---
[07:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=450s) Learning Comms by Doing: Diplomacy, Counterinsurgency, and Trial by Fire
Lulu's path into high-stakes communications began entirely outside the field. In graduate school, she studied diplomacy and international security with a concentration in counterinsurgency, intending to enter government service. Barred from many federal security roles because she had not yet naturalized as a US citizen, she transitioned into geopolitical and political risk consulting in Washington, DC. Her work centered on complex corporate crosscurrents—advising tech giants like Google on operating amidst regime changes (such as coups in Egypt) or handling the fraught political environment surrounding Alibaba's record-setting US public listing.
During the Alibaba IPO, she partnered closely with Jim Wilkinson, a Texas native, former government official, and then-head of corporate affairs for Alibaba under Jack Ma. Following the successful listing, Wilkinson launched TrailRunner International and invited Lulu to co-found the firm as COO, taking a massive gamble on her despite her having zero PR background.
Thrown immediately into high-pressure pitches with the leadership of Citadel, S&P Global, and Gap Inc., Lulu had to Google basic definitions of PR and corporate communications at night while learning on the job by making public blunders. In executive meetings, she was occasionally pulled aside and advised, "maybe fewer like Power Rangers references next time." In a meeting with Gap executives, she initially mistook corporate comms for retail marketing, suggesting promotional tactics like running summer sales. Through direct exposure and unvarnished feedback, she mastered the craft by doing the work under intense pressure.
- **Graduate academic specialization:** Diplomacy, international security, and counterinsurgency.
- **Geopolitical risk focus:** Managing political shocks (e.g., Google navigating the Egyptian revolution and coup) and foreign corporate entries (e.g., Chinese regulatory and privacy scrutiny around Alibaba).
- **TrailRunner International founding:** Partnered with Alibaba's head of corporate affairs Jim Wilkinson to launch the strategic advisory firm.
[10:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=604s) Learning Comms with Anduril
When Lulu Cheng Meservey first entered communications, clients expected standard, traditional PR—an approach completely divorced from how she operates today. At the beginning, the job felt like a mechanical, bewildering exercise: "wipe on, wipe off, what am I doing here?" Having no formal credentials or reputation, she found that no one would answer her emails and reporters rightfully declined to take her seriously. Everything shifted when she met Matt Steckman (now president of Anduril) and Trae Stephens (co-founder and chairman of Anduril) while they were all based in Washington, D.C. Stephens recommended her to handle communications for Anduril, despite the team having already interviewed numerous established PR options.
At the time, Anduril was still in its very first year, roughly the same age as the agency she had co-founded. The company existed in a state of semi-stealth. Rather than staging a polished modern launch with a cinematic video, Anduril merely had a bare-bones website that provided just enough mysterious surface area to fuel wild gossip and conspiracy theories about what Palmer Luckey was building, but not enough clear facts to define the narrative. To their credit, the leadership team realized they could no longer let rumors dictate their identity and needed to actively define what the company stood for.
- Steckman and Stephens gave Lulu her break while both Anduril and her communications firm were in their infancy.
- Unlike modern tech launches that rely on tightly produced, cinematic reveal videos, Anduril's initial footprint consisted of an ambiguous website that generated runaway speculation.
[11:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=702s) The Startup as an Insurgent Movement
Meservey viewed Anduril from the start as an insurgent force fighting an entrenched status quo. They were a tiny team going up against multi-billion-dollar defense primes like Boeing and Raytheon. Worse, they were running entirely counter to the cultural grain of their own peers in Silicon Valley, where working with the U.S. government was treated as toxic. At that very moment, Google employees were staging walkouts to protest the company's participation in the Department of Defense's Project Maven. On top of that, Anduril was locked out of mainstream media distribution because tech journalists openly despised Palmer Luckey. Having been ousted from Facebook over his political support for Donald Trump, Luckey was treated across tech and media as a pariah whose exile was viewed by the establishment as entirely justified.
Realizing that no mainstream institution would give them a fair hearing, the founders chose to bypass gatekeepers entirely, take control of their message, and forge their own distribution channels. Meservey views their decision to bet on her as life-altering: while Luckey often generously remarks that she helped them with communications, she insists that working alongside Palmer, Trae Stephens, Brian Schimpf, and Matt Steckman is actually where she learned how to do comms in the first place. When David Senra pushes back—suggesting that her singular personality would have eventually "rage-quit" ordinary corporate PR anyway—she acknowledges her instinct to break away, but emphasizes that Anduril was the crucible that taught her the mechanics of asymmetric counterinsurgency: accepting that you lack traditional media access, refusing to rely on legacy networks, and building your own apparatus from scratch.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: Legacy Comms vs Counterinsurgent Comms
accDescr: Flowchart contrasting traditional PR media gatekeeping with the direct counterinsurgent approach.
subgraph Traditional["Traditional PR Approach"]
A["Company Message"] --> B["Media Filter & Prism"]
B --> C["Hostile or Distorted Narrative"]
C --> D["Skeptical Audience"]
end
subgraph Insurgent["Counterinsurgent Go Direct Approach"]
E["Unfiltered Truth & Vision"] --> F["Magnetic Manifesto"]
F --> G["Direct Distribution & Channels"]
G --> H["High-Conviction Believers"]
end
```
[15:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=954s) What Makes a Great Manifesto
During her formal studies in counterinsurgency, Meservey was instructed to role-play as a terrorist group, rooted in the military doctrine that you cannot defeat an adversary without deeply understanding their psychology and operating methods. Students had to craft mock organizations from the ground up, articulating their core mission, vision, and operational manifesto. That training made her intensely "manifesto-pilled," instilling a lifelong respect for written doctrine as an asymmetric weapon.
A truly great manifesto begins by acknowledging the overwhelming material asymmetry between an insurgent and an incumbent. It looks squarely at the opposition and admits that the incumbents hold every conventional advantage: they have more headcount, more capital, superior force, and existing societal legitimacy. The insurgent overcomes that mountain of resources solely through raw intensity. Citing the aphorism that "one man plus the truth is a majority," she explains that a tiny band of people who are genuinely willing to die for a cause possess an intensity that no amount of corporate money or bureaucratic incumbency can match.
The essential job of a manifesto is to crystallize that intensity into words and paint a vision of the future so compelling that once people read it, they cannot erase it from their minds. It functions as a powerful magnet. Without articulating that concrete vision, a founder has no moral right to ask talented people to walk away from high-paying, secure jobs and leave comfortable families to join what might otherwise look like a suicide mission.
- Counterinsurgency simulations required building full ideological apparatuses to understand how small factions challenge massive state actors.
- Incumbents possess superior capital, force, numbers, and institutional legitimacy, but insurgents counter with asymmetric intensity and purpose.
- A manifesto serves as the foundational moral justification for recruiting talent into high-risk, high-conviction ventures.
[18:47](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=1127s) Go Direct and Narrative Sovereignty
This philosophy crystallized into Meservey's own publication, *Go Direct: The Manifesto*. After weeks spent agonizing over clever titles, she settled on the simplest declaration, writing the entire piece in about two hours. The central thesis of the manifesto is uncompromising: traditional PR is dead—a corpse that may still be visible in boardrooms, but has no pulse. For decades, traditional communications forced companies to route their ideas through the distorting prism of outside journalists, hoping that third-party gatekeepers possessed the goodwill, alignment, and competence to represent them accurately. While anodyne, consensus-driven ideas can pass through that prism relatively unscathed, any idea that is unconventional, controversial, or truly ahead of its time will inevitably be warped.
Beyond the tactical utility of avoiding media distortion, Meservey argues that circumventing middlemen is a matter of fundamental self-reliance. Human beings and organizations are sovereign entities that ought to control their own destiny. Reclaiming that authority over one's own voice and public perception constitutes what she terms "narrative sovereignty"—the refusal to outsource the story of your life or your company to someone else's whims.
- Traditional PR forces founders to gamble on the alignment and fairness of outside intermediaries who rarely share their incentives.
- Unconventional, boundary-pushing projects suffer the most when filtered through conventional media consensus.
- "Narrative sovereignty" asserts that founders must retain ultimate control over how their mission is framed to the world.
[20:31](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=1231s) The Power and Necessity of the Founder's Story
A manifesto serves as both permission and an urgent exhortation for founders: no PR surrogate, agency, or third party is ever going to tell their story for them. While that realization can feel daunting, it is fundamentally liberating. Founders already apply relentless rigor to hiring, architecture, and shipping product, and that exact same seriousness must be applied to their narrative. Early on, a startup possesses minimal tangible proof or track record; all the founder has is their word, backed by personal reputation. The most legendary founders approach the people they know and pitch a vision that sounds borderline absurd—asking them to believe simply because they trust the messenger. There is simply no substitute for the founder stepping forward directly.
David Senra notes that Lulu Cheng Meservey's manifesto relies on an ancient concept, drawing clear parallels to historic figures like Julius Caesar, Napoleon Bonaparte, Winston Churchill, and Abraham Lincoln who rallied populations around powerful ideas. Meservey explains that her strategic communications firm, Rostra, takes its name directly from the historic Rostra—the elevated speaker’s platform in ancient Rome:
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: The Rostra Mechanism
accDescr: How an orator on the Roman Rostra shifted public perception directly.
subgraph Rome ["The Rostra Platform"]
A["Public Sentiment: State A<br/>(Confusion, Hostility, Skepticism)"]
B["Leader Climbs the Rostra<br/>(Speaks Directly to the Assembly)"]
C["Public Sentiment: State B<br/>(New Shared Consensus)"]
end
A --> B
B --> C
```
From that platform, a speaker could haul themselves up in front of a hostile or confused crowd, address the citizens directly, and step down to find the mood of the entire empire radically inverted. That exact transformation occurred in the volatile aftermath of Julius Caesar’s assassination, where public perception of legitimacy flipped entirely based on the rhetoric delivered from the Rostra. Humanity mastered the art of gathering, persuading, and mobilizing groups millennia ago; modern culture has merely lost touch with that craft through shortened attention spans and endless digital distractions.
[23:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=1380s) The "Go Direct" Strategy Born at Anduril
The core thesis of going direct arose out of sheer necessity rather than a clever marketing playbook. When Meservey began working with Anduril Industries alongside Palmer Luckey, Matt Grimm, Brian Schimpf, and Trae Stephens, playing the conventional media access game was virtually impossible. Luckey had recently been ousted from Facebook over his political support for Donald Trump, making mainstream tech reporters intensely hostile or unwilling to give the venture an unbiased hearing.
Instead of pursuing traditional startup milestones like coverage in TechCrunch or competing for "coolest startup" trophies at industry conferences, Anduril completely bypassed standard press gatekeepers:
* Palmer Luckey and the founding team traveled straight to military and intelligence hubs—walking directly into Camp Pendleton, Marine Corps Base Quantico, the CIA, and the National Defense University.
* They skipped abstract pitch decks and put the hardware and software straight in front of active-duty operators to let the technology speak for itself.
* They applied the same philosophy to talent recruitment, speaking to top-tier defense minds directly rather than hoping prospective hires might stumble across an article in a mainstream outlet.
Meservey points out the utter absurdity of acting as a "supplicant" to mainstream media outlets like *The New York Times*. Going that route means hoping a mass-market article read by 500,000 strangers happens to reach the 200 key individuals who actually matter to the business. Worse, relying on a press hierarchy fundamentally dilutes narrative power:
```mermaid
flowchart LR
accTitle: Message Dilution via Conventional PR
accDescr: A comparison of diluted traditional media channels versus direct founder communication.
subgraph Traditional ["Conventional Intermediary Path (Loss of Intensity)"]
direction TB
F["Founder"] --> PR["PR Team"]
PR --> R["Reporter"]
R --> E["Editor"]
E --> Mass["Mass Audience<br/>('Spray and Pray')"]
end
subgraph Direct ["Go Direct Strategy"]
direction TB
FD["Founder"] -->|"Unfiltered Signal"| Core["Direct Target<br/>(e.g., 5 Key ML Engineers)"]
end
```
Every layer added between the founder and the listener—from the internal comms staff attempting to rephrase the vision, to the reporter pitching their editor, to the editor cutting copy—waters down the message's raw intensity. Today's artificial intelligence landscape illustrates this dynamic perfectly. An AI startup targeting five world-class machine learning engineers gains nothing by appearing on morning television shows like *Good Morning America*, *Live with Kelly and Mark*, or *The Oprah Winfrey Show*. By contrast, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong chose to appear on a niche show called *Pod of Jake*, hosted by an interviewer named Jake who had roughly 100 listeners at the time. Despite the microscopic audience, it reached the exact high-signal peers Armstrong needed to engage. When founders know the exact individuals they need to convince, the only sensible move is to work backward from the specific podcasts, Substacks, and X feeds those individuals consume.
[26:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=1605s) Intensity, Synthesis, and Mission-Driven Founders
Senra recounts spending eight continuous hours in conversation with Palmer Luckey, marveling at Luckey's inexhaustible stamina, storytelling ability, and unpredictable insights—noting that the sheer intensity eventually forced him to call in backup podcasters just to keep up. While Palmer Luckey and Shopify's Tobi Lütke possess immense, unconventional charisma, Meservey clarifies that theatrical charm is not a prerequisite for going direct. Introverted, quiet, or reserved founders can execute the strategy just as effectively, provided their technical conviction is fully fleshed out and their personal intensity of belief remains utterly unassailable.
A substantial part of Meservey’s advisory work consists of functioning as a synthesizing mirror for technical leaders. Founders are often domain geniuses who drown listeners in complex operational mechanics, much like an entrepreneur Meservey once advised at an event:
* The founder spent six minutes laying out an intricate pitch about enabling domestic home cooks to act as decentralized cloud kitchens, bypassing DoorDash's limited local selection via a specialized delivery network.
* Meservey listened through the detailed mechanics and compressed the entire vision into a clean six-word thesis: *"So, you're turning a cook into a chef."*
* The founder immediately adopted the phrasing because it captured the beating heart of his enterprise in a format that was instantly viral and repeatable.
To ignite an enduring movement, raw clarity must be backed by genuine conviction. Meservey shares that Rostra's active client roster has grown to more than a dozen companies, and across that entire group, not a single one lacks a deep, mission-driven core. Without authentic mission alignment and extreme personal conviction, the strategy of putting the founder front and center simply collapses under public scrutiny.
[30:17](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=1817s) Concentric Circles of Conviction
When David asks what founders must do internally before they can effectively go direct, Lulu emphasizes that the very first step is self-persuasion: "They need to convince themselves." Persuasion works outward in concentric circles, where the center dot is the sovereign individual who truly believes they are leading a movement. If a leader has not dedicated their life to the cause and clarified why it is worth doing, no follower will buy into the mission. Lulu draws direct parallels to history's most compelling wartime commanders: if Napoleon is not willing to die for the cause or charge across the bridge himself, why would any ordinary soldier do it? The same dynamic played out with Julius Caesar during the battle against Vercingetorix, where Caesar wore distinctive, high-visibility clothing that made him the easiest target on the battlefield, immediately rallying his retreating men. The identical principle drove Joan of Arc.
When people see a leader putting themselves on the line in a way that makes observers feel ashamed not to follow, conviction spreads. The figure at the exact center must possess the greatest intensity, the deepest passion, and the sharpest vision of the promised land.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: Concentric Circles of Conviction
accDescr: Diagram illustrating how conviction spreads outward from the sovereign founder to the world.
subgraph Core ["The Core"]
A["Sovereign Founder<br/>(Absolute Conviction & Sacrifice)"]
end
subgraph Outer ["Expanding Circles"]
B["Team & Inner Circle<br/>(Inspired by Leader's Example)"]
C["Early Adopters & Backers<br/>(Drawn to Authenticity)"]
D["The General Public & Market<br/>(Movement Adoption)"]
end
A --> B
B --> C
C --> D
```
[31:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=1890s) The Human Equation: Why Rostra Exists
David pauses to ask Lulu why she works so relentlessly—grinding seven days a week, answering late-night calls at 11:00 PM while raising multiple children—and what her overarching mission actually is. Lulu explains her core philosophy: the world is fundamentally improved when new technologies are allowed to take root and flourish. However, in modern innovation, building the technology is often much easier than getting humans to actually understand, embrace, and use it.
She pushes back on the common myth: "It is not *if you build it, they will come*." She notes with amusement that people often assume that adage comes from the Bible, when it actually originated in the movie *Field of Dreams* about building a baseball stadium. In real life, an engineer can build a breakthrough product, only to see it ignored, regulated out of existence, or crushed because nobody wants to work on it. While Silicon Valley pours immense talent and capital into raw engineering and infrastructure, there is an alarming shortage of thought and effort invested in the human side:
- Persuading regular people to welcome a breakthrough into their everyday routines.
- Navigating public and governmental resistance (such as local moratoria on building data centers).
- Rallying world-class people to leave safe careers and build on the frontier.
[33:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=2003s) How AI Leaders Alienate the Public
David notes that AI currently suffers from one of the lowest favorability ratings of any emerging sector, pointing out that tech leaders are getting openly booed when discussing AI at commencement speeches. Lulu diagnoses why tech leadership is mismanaging the narrative. When tech executives predict massive economic disruption, Lulu does not fault them for being honest—if a leader genuinely believes AI will cause widespread unemployment, they have an ethical obligation to warn the public and help society prepare. The critical failure is how they deliver that message: "Don't look happy when you're saying it. Don't be smiling when you say there's going to be a 50% unemployment rate in a year."
She critiques Eric Schmidt's commencement speech as a prime case study of tone-deaf messaging:
- **Wrong Protagonist:** Schmidt framed the technology itself as the protagonist, issuing a blunt "get on the train or you're on the tracks" ultimatum. Instead of telling the graduating students that they are the heroes armed with miraculous tools to reshape the world, he framed them as passive obstacles about to be steamrolled.
- **Blasé Delivery:** While informing anxious young graduates that half their prospective jobs might evaporate, Schmidt appeared totally secure, detached, and unbothered, failing to acknowledge or mirror the audience's dread and uncertainty.
When a speaker delivers devastating news about a listener's status, livelihood, and purpose with a casual smile, trust evaporates instantly: "You don't think of me as being on your side." Lulu notes that in any dispute, persuasion begins by establishing common ground on something neutral.
This sparks a playful argument between the two: Lulu insists on drinking hot chocolate at every business dinner, declaring it a secret "performance beverage" packed with untapped alpha that fuels her voice, while David teases her that hot chocolate is an inappropriate drink for a grown adult compared to his zinc throat spray. Reconciling their mock debate, they joke about finding shared ground by appreciating the set at the Aman New York. When AI leaders present themselves as detached elites who share nothing in common with everyday people, audiences instinctively assume their interests are completely misaligned.
[38:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=2290s) The Power of Story and a Love Letter to Capitalism
Following a brief message highlighting Deel as an essential platform for hiring and managing global talent, David returns to Lulu's insight on human psychology: "Humans crave a story." He references Steve Jobs's famous maxim that "the storyteller is the most powerful person in the world." David reflects on the deeper alignment between Lulu's comms work and his own mission with the podcast. He describes his show as fundamentally conceived to be an unapologetic love letter to capitalism and human agency. That worldview is rooted in his family history as the son and grandson of Cuban immigrants who fled their homeland after Fidel Castro took power, having witnessed firsthand what happens when individual enterprise and freedom are stripped away.
[39:55](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=2395s) Techno-Optimism and The Jetsons Rule
Reflecting on how a single decision by a person he never met completely altered the trajectory of his life, David Senra observes that capitalism remains one of humanity's greatest inventions—a driving force of prosperity that ought to be celebrated rather than vilified. Recalling a multi-hour conversation with Jeff Bezos, Senra described telling the Amazon founder how unhinged it was that protesters placed a mock guillotine outside his home, given what he had built: "You made a magic button that I can press, and anything comes to my house. Used to be two days, now it comes three hours later." Senra told Bezos he deserved every penny, sending Bezos into fits of laughter. Yet winning public sentiment requires more than reciting the failures and death tolls of communism in places like Cuba; it requires telling a vastly superior, compelling story. Senra argues that the people leading artificial intelligence today are failing to craft that better narrative, even though AI feels genuinely miraculous in everyday use.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: Ambient vs. Foreground Technology Storytelling
accDescr: Contrast between effective techno-optimist narratives with ambient tech versus ineffective PR or dystopian narratives.
subgraph Dystopian["Dystopian Storytelling (e.g., Terminator, Blade Runner)"]
D1["Technology placed in foreground"] --> D2["Tech is the explicit focus and threat"]
D2 --> D3["Captures cultural imagination, evokes fear"]
end
subgraph FlawedPR["Heavy-Handed Techno-Optimism (Current AI PR)"]
F1["Bludgeons audience with the tech"] --> F2["Feels like self-serving corporate PR"]
F2 --> F3["Dismissed and tuned out by the public"]
end
subgraph AmbientOptimism["Ambient Optimism (The Jetsons Rule)"]
A1["Human drama & relationships in foreground"] --> A2["Technology remains ambient infrastructure"]
A2 --> A3["Inspires belief, builds durable optimism"]
end
```
Lulu Cheng Meservey agrees, pointing out that existing attempts at techno-optimism feel heavy-handed, self-serving, and read like overt PR. She notes that the last time techno-optimism genuinely resonated was *The Jetsons*. The show never hammered viewers over the head with the proclamation that "technology is going to make your life great"; it was simply an ordinary family sitcom. The flying cars and robotic maid remained completely in the background—ambient and assumed. In contrast, dystopian narratives like *The Terminator* or *Blade Runner* deliberately place technology in the foreground, making the machine the central subject of terror. When utopian advocates copy that structure and put the technology front and center, people immediately discount it as marketing spin. The most enduring science fiction novels—such as Neal Stephenson’s *The Diamond Age* (following Nell and her family) or *Seveneves* (centering on the human drama of people thrust into space to preserve the species)—treat technology purely as an enabling backdrop. It is precisely those human-centric, ambient stories that have inspired founders like Palmer Luckey to build companies.
- Senra recalled telling Jeff Bezos: "The idea that they protested outside of your house and they put a f***ing guillotine in front of your house is insane to me."
- Effective sci-fi stories show a better world through human relationships while leaving the technological marvels in the ambiance, rather than obsessing over the mechanical details of an invention.
---
[43:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=2591s) Bicycles for the Mind and the Power of Analogy
Senra connects the principle of ambient technology to the classic canon of Madison Avenue advertising, citing titans like David Ogilvy, Claude Hopkins, and Albert Lasker. Their core rule was always identical: "Show the benefit... Don't show your product. Show the change it enables." Senra highlights Steve Jobs in his twenties illustrating this concept through locomotion efficiency studies. Condors topped the list of the most efficient creatures moving across Earth, while humans ranked poorly—until a human was put on a bicycle, surpassing the condor by a wide margin. By framing the personal computer as a "bicycle for the mind," Jobs did not pitch microchips, RAM, or technical specs; he promised intellectual leverage that turned a slow human into the most efficient thinker on the planet.
Lulu points out that Jobs's phrase worked on two distinct levels: it emphasized the internal transformation of the user, and it leveraged a universal analogy. By evoking a bicycle, Jobs eliminated the need for two full paragraphs of technical explanation because the audience already possessed an intuitive mental model. Lulu relates this to a recent conversation with an enterprise founder struggling to pitch a platform that ingests raw corporate data and cuts organizational waste. After listening to his convoluted explanation, she distilled it immediately: "Oh, it's Ozempic for companies." A strong analogy simultaneously captures high-level complexity and radical simplicity, providing the ultimate communications shortcut.
---
[45:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=2730s) Shopify and Making the Merchant the Hero
Turning to how these storytelling dynamics apply to the companies she advises, Senra asks how Shopify’s leadership articulates its reason for being. Lulu, who sits on Shopify's board, explains that founder Tobi Lütke operates on two intertwined levels. At the macro level, Shopify views entrepreneurship as the ultimate hedge against human obsolescence. If automation eventually displaces conventional employment, human agency and the drive to create will remain the last bastion of economic value—and Shopify provides the foundational infrastructure ensuring anyone can exercise that agency.
On the commercial level, Tobi Lütke and Harley Finkelstein tell the company's story exclusively through their merchants. When Kim Kardashian, Jens Grede, and their team launched SKIMS, they did not have to spend months engineering bespoke web architecture, payment rails, and backend logistics; Shopify quietly handled the plumbing. The same dynamic applies whether the merchant is an iconic global brand heading toward an IPO or a retiree opening a small-town marmalade shop:
> "The Jetsons are the hero of the story. It is not called 'Show About Robots'... It's the same thing with Shopify. In the SKIMS story, Kim and Jens and their team, they're the entrepreneurs, they're the hero. Shopify is ambient, because without them, none of this would be possible in its current form. But you are not bludgeoning people with, 'This is about Shopify.'"
---
[47:55](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=2875s) The Epidemic of Fake Launches and Bot Slop
Senra references Lulu's 2026 essay "Standing Out," asking her to unpack its thesis on how founders must adapt in an era oversaturated with synthetic content. Lulu describes the piece as her personal "Philippic"—an aggressive tirade against an ecosystem where virtually everything has begun to look, feel, and sound entirely fake.
Product rollouts across tech have descended into a sea of identical, templated "cinematic slop" videos that lost their originality after the first few appearances. Worse still, much of the public reception is visibly astroturfed. Senra brings up an announcement post he spotted earlier that day sporting a mere 100 likes alongside 4,700 retweets—an absurd, inverted ratio that blatantly exposed paid bot amplification. Lulu confirms that having an experienced eye and receiving inbound pitches from promotion agencies makes the deception immediately obvious. When a launch post generates engagement wildly disproportionate to the actual appeal of the product, clicking into the accounts reveals an army of burner handles based in developing countries that do nothing but shill corporate tech announcements.
[49:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=2965s) Do Things That Can't Be Faked
When a company relies on manufactured engagement, David Senra observes that the damage goes far beyond a single deceptive post: he immediately writes off the entire enterprise. It is not just a fake video or inflated numbers; in his eyes, it reveals a "fake company with a fake founder," ensuring he will never buy their product, do business with them, or recommend them to talent. Addressing what founders should do instead in an era flooded with synthetic noise, Lulu Cheng Meservey advises leaning entirely into things that cannot be faked.
The first step is prioritizing genuine signal over vanity metrics. It is vastly better to put out work representing the absolute best version of what a company does and earn the attention of fifty real people who genuinely care than to rack up thousands of automated retweets. Beyond metrics, non-replicable human connections become the ultimate defense. Founders should directly tell their friends, rely on personal networks, and partner with people they have known and trusted for years. Unfakers also include real-world gatherings—such as hosting people at your home to talk through ideas—because an artificial entity cannot reproduce human hospitality. Meservey notes that what completely separates the authentic from the synthetic is a palpable sense of taste, discernment, and care: fake things simply are not made with love.
- Quality engagement beats hollow scale: fifty engaged humans who feel directly spoken to matter more than thousands of bot-driven retweets.
- Real human relationships and long-term partnerships cannot be spoofed by fly-by-night operations.
- Offline, real-world experiences—such as inviting people into your living room—remain entirely out of reach for fake companies.
---
[50:55](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=3055s) The Return to Beauty and Universal Aesthetics
Meservey argues that culture is currently undergoing a much-needed "return to beauty," moving past roughly a decade dominated by aesthetic relativism. For years, cultural discourse insisted that everything was equally beautiful in the eye of the beholder, pretending that obvious trash was on par with the old masters, or that poor health was indistinguishable from vibrant vitality. Senra and Meservey point to commercial missteps like Victoria's Secret abandoning its core aesthetic to showcase obesity and men, comparing the phase to the emperor's new clothes—or "the emperor's new lingerie"—where everyone was coerced into pretending something looked appealing when it clearly did not. Today, people are once again allowed to state plainly that a beautiful building is objectively superior to an ugly one, and that aesthetic excellence is inherently worthwhile.
Meservey cites Joe Gebbia and the National Design Studio team, who are working to bring high-level private sector design talent into government software. Their philosophy is that beautiful digital experiences reflect the fundamental dignity of citizenship, proving that even mundane or pedestrian interfaces do not have to be ugly. When Senra asks whether an appreciation for beauty is universal, Meservey agrees wholeheartedly. Senra recalls reading the autobiography of Kelly Johnson, the legendary founder of Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works. Under immense pressure that ultimately gave him ulcers and required part of his stomach to be removed, Johnson bought a ranch and found solace in watching the sunset every evening, declaring that nothing on Earth was more beautiful. Senra notes that Johnson wrote that forty years ago, but the truth of it was just as real during the reign of Julius Caesar.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: The Cycle of Cultural Aesthetics
accDescr: Diagram contrasting the era of aesthetic relativism with the modern return to beauty and craft.
subgraph Relativism["The Decade of Relativism"]
A["Aesthetic Equivalence<br/>('Everything is beautiful')"] --> B["Denial of Standards & Craft"]
B --> C["Fake, Loveless Artifacts & Slop"]
end
subgraph ReturnToBeauty["The Return to Beauty"]
D["Recognition of Objective Beauty"] --> E["Intentional Craft & Dignity<br/>(e.g., National Design Studio)"]
E --> F["Authenticity & Lasting Value"]
end
C -.->|"Cultural Exhaustion"| D
```
---
[54:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=3250s) Taste as the Ultimate Antidote to the Fake
Reflecting on sunsets, Meservey invokes Cicero's treatise on friendship from 50 BC, remarking that the only thing more beautiful than a sunset is watching it "with the homies." Cicero noted that gazing at the stars is a joy, but sharing that view with a friend elevates it entirely. Friendship, like beauty, is an authentic human bond that cannot be fabricated. When exploring why taste—defined as the recognition of beauty—serves as the antidote to falseness, Meservey points out that fake things are never beautiful in practice. While theoretically someone could manufacture a beautiful fake, it empirically never happens because no one invests genuine love and craft into an artifact when their only goal is buying synthetic engagement. Beauty serves as an unmistakable scoreboard and a stamp of authenticity; much like vibrant physical health, it cannot be faked.
In business, this dedication to beauty manifests in obsessive refinement. Meservey points to the website her team built with General Matter. An extraordinary amount of billable hours, collaborative debate, and cumulative brainpower went into the project, only to distill everything down into an exceptionally clean interface and a remarkably concise manifesto. That level of effortless elegance is only possible through grueling iteration. If the company had simply assembled a lazy "slop site," vibe-coded it, and dumped Claude-generated copy onto the page, the result would lack soul and fail to convey genuine authority.
---
[57:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=3431s) Originality Over Templates
A cornerstone of Meservey's practice is an absolute refusal to use templates, despite constant requests from clients and founders. While relying on templates would allow her to "pass the marshmallow test" and save twenty minutes of reading time each night, she resists the shortcut for two fundamental reasons:
1. **Context and Texture:** Every business situation is unique. Relying on boilerplate solutions ignores the distinct cracks in reality where competitive advantage and alpha are found. Defaulting to a pre-packaged format sacrifices the chance to improve upon past work, which Meservey views as settling for "the schlubby nonsense of the thing that I did when I was six months dumber than I am now."
2. **The Duty of Originality:** Anything truly worth doing deserves fresh thinking. Meservey believes that offering a template to a founder she respects would be an insult to their originality and an admission of creative laziness.
Senra ties this mindset to a favorite quote from Peter Thiel's *Zero to One*: successful leaders discover value in unexpected places by thinking from first principles rather than formulas. Senra illustrates this principle through AppLovin, which eschewed typical advertising conventions to connect brands with over a billion users inside mobile games using full-screen, high-retention video formats that command attention for an average of 35 seconds.
[01:00:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=3627s) Originality Over Templates
David recalls an incident at a past event for Cognition—which happened to take place in the very same hotel where they are recording—illustrating how pervasive templates have become in corporate communications. The Cognition founders had invited David to interview two founders on stage. Because David routes all his communication to text and notoriously ignores his inbox, he only opened an email thread when he saw Lulu’s name pop up. Inside the thread, another founder’s traditional PR representative had sent over a pre-packaged list of approved questions for David to ask. David was stunned by the presumption that anyone could dictate what comes out of his mouth, but before he even needed to respond, Lulu intervened directly on the thread, blunt and uncompromising: "These questions suck, and David would never ask these questions. These aren't good enough."
Lulu's reaction highlighted how standard PR output collapses into predictable, bland auto-complete. David notes that magnetic communicators like Palmer Luckey, Marc Andreessen, and Elon Musk captivate audiences precisely because they refuse to speak in template form; they lean unapologetically into their idiosyncrasies. Lulu explains that the moment someone relies on a template, they forfeit any possibility of excellence. While AI writing tools are useful, relying on them for core messaging drops the creator straight down to "sea level"—producing the exact same generic output that anyone else can generate for fractions of a cent per token.
She argues that if someone's native ability is far below average, using an automated template makes sense because average is an upgrade. But for anyone striving to be better than average, relying on generic patterns is self-sabotage. Quoting Ralph Waldo Emerson's declaration that "imitation is suicide," Lulu emphasizes that a person's soul is their unique combination of beliefs, ideas, and feelings. Suppressing that distinctive spark to mimic prior work kills a sacred part of oneself and robs the world of anything genuinely new.
[01:04:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=3842s) Do What Only You Can Do
Turning to Lulu's broader advisory philosophy at Rostra—where she handles founder, executive, and crisis communications—David asks whether the core premise is forcing founders to lean hard into their most distinct traits rather than playing it safe. Lulu affirms that her entire strategy centers on doing what only she can do, and demanding the same of her clients. She readily acknowledges that others may be smarter, more seasoned, or better connected, but her unique combination of skills is irreplaceable when an insurgent company needs to build a cultural movement around technology of civilizational importance. In an era inundated with synthetic, fabricated noise, blending in guarantees invisibility; founders must fight through the ambient clutter by presenting their authentic, unfiltered selves to attract their true tribe.
David connects this ethos to UFC CEO Dana White, suggesting that every founder should study White's raw post-fight press conferences. White operates on a deceptively simple two-step framework: first, ruthlessly figure out who you are; second, figure out what you want to do with your life. Once those decisions are locked, you simply wake up every single day and execute without stopping. Lulu observes that the greatest repeat founders mirror this clarity across their careers. For instance, William Hockey building Column after co-founding Plaid represents a natural continuation of one overarching life mission—a single "meta company" that an entrepreneur will never sell because it is the ultimate thing they were put on earth to build.
[01:07:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=4034s) The Jetsons Rule and Ambient Storytelling
Lulu introduces what she dubs the "Jetsons Rule"—a storytelling principle exemplified by how Dana White popularized mixed martial arts. Before MMA became a mainstream sporting spectacle, White knew that audiences could not be won over by overt, heavy-handed promotional pitches. Instead, the UFC produced *The Ultimate Fighter* reality show. While watching combat sports was niche at the time, human beings have always been universally captivated by personal striving, struggle, and human drama. Viewers tuned in for the compelling human narrative of athletes living and training together, while the sport of MMA sat quietly and ambiently in the background. By the end of a season, viewers had effortlessly absorbed the mechanics and excitement of the sport without feeling sold to.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: The Jetsons Rule Mechanism
accDescr: How ambient storytelling embeds a product into human-interest drama rather than overt advertising.
subgraph Overt["Traditional PR Approach"]
A["Heavy-handed overt messaging"] --> B["Audience skepticism and tune-out"]
end
subgraph Ambient["The Jetsons Rule"]
C["Universal human struggle & striving"] --> D["Engaged audience emotional buy-in"]
E["Product / Niche (MMA, F1, Tech)"] -.->|"Ambiently in background"| D
D --> F["Organic absorption and adoption"]
end
```
Lulu notes that the exact same phenomenon drove the global boom in Formula 1 through Netflix’s *Drive to Survive* series; viewers who previously had zero interest in motor racing became obsessed because the sport was framed around personal conflicts and individual ambition. David and Lulu draw parallels to popular culture—such as viewers absorbing the inner workings of street-level trade simply by following character journeys in *The Wire*—concluding that audiences embrace novel or complex ideas best when they are absorbed as a natural byproduct of a story they already care about. This directly mirrors the lessons of enduring history, where classical masters of persuasion like Cicero understood that human nature remains constant across centuries.
[01:08:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=4130s) The UFC Mindset: "Don't Get Ready. Stay Ready."
David Senra reflects on the universality of human nature by bringing up UFC CEO Dana White. White had explained to David that when he was first building the UFC, everyone warned him that nobody would want to watch two people fight in a cage. White disregarded the critics because combat is hardwired into thousands of years of human history: "We love watching people fighting." Better yet, combat sports transcend language entirely. Whether an audience member is American, Brazilian, or Chinese, they understand the visceral drama immediately without needing translation. White knew from day one that the concept was globally scalable.
Lulu Cheng Meservey connects to this by sharing a formative experience from her early comms career at TrailRunner International. For an early company retreat, their team went to train physically and mentally with Hall of Fame fighter Urijah Faber—who pioneered the bantamweight division—and his fight team. Faber and his fighters imparted two core lessons that deeply shaped Lulu's professional ethos:
- **"Nobody owes you anything":** Young fighters regularly arrive at the gym straight off a plane from Brazil with nothing more than a backpack on their shoulders. They don't wait for permission, an elaborate support infrastructure, or someone to declare that they are finally ready; they simply step into the cage and perform.
- **"Don't get ready. Stay ready":** A fighter's biggest break often arrives on short notice when a headliner gets injured or pulls out. If you are not already in peak condition, the window closes. Lulu emphasizes that this attitude serves as an essential guiding principle for career, startup strategy, and life.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: The UFC Fighter Mindset Applied to Strategy
accDescr: Visual breakdown of Urijah Faber's fighting mindset showing internal preparation leading to seized opportunity.
subgraph Internal["Internal Posture"]
A["'Nobody Owes You Anything'"] --> C["Total Self-Reliance"]
B["'Don't Get Ready. Stay Ready.'"] --> D["Constant Preparation"]
end
subgraph External["External Outcome"]
C --> E["Sudden High-Stakes Opportunity"]
D --> E
E --> F["Immediate Execution Without Hesitation"]
end
```
---
[01:10:41](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=4241s) The Five Pillars of Strategy and the Rule of Compounding
David pauses to consolidate the core principles that Lulu embodies throughout her work. He observes that iconic founders rarely build enduring empires on twenty disparate ideas; they execute ruthlessly on three to five core concepts. David recaps what he sees as her primary tenets:
1. **Distinctiveness:** Lean aggressively into what makes you uniquely different.
2. **Go Direct:** Bypass intermediaries and speak straight to your core constituency.
3. **Simplicity:** Radically simplify the message so it can spread effortlessly.
4. **Mission:** Anchor every endeavor in a clear, compelling purpose.
Lulu agrees and provides the vital fifth principle: **Trust yourself**. While it sounds like soft self-help advice on the surface, she stresses that it actually requires an "insane confidence in your idea." In high-stakes moments, a founder is frequently confronted by a million dissenting voices insisting that an objective is impossible. Drawing on the adage that "one man plus the truth is a majority," she argues that a founder must firmly believe their perception of reality is correct and refuse to cave to consensus.
Furthermore, self-trust must be maintained over long time horizons to allow for compounding. Lulu points out a fundamental mathematical and philosophical rule of compounding that leaders constantly violate:
- **Compounding cannot occur if the underlying asset or vision constantly changes.**
- If you continually shift your core thesis based on external panic or transient trends, you reset the clock to zero every single time. Compounding requires picking your bedrock truth and holding fast so results can accumulate geometrically.
---
[01:12:29](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=4349s) Referential Mania and Nabokov’s "Signs and Symbols"
To demonstrate why narrative architecture is the founder's ultimate job, Lulu walks David through a sequence of narrative events based on Vladimir Nabokov’s short story *"Signs and Symbols"*. She recounts the story of an elderly, impoverished European immigrant couple living in the United States. Their son is institutionalized in an asylum following repeated suicide attempts caused by "referential mania"—a paranoid psychological condition where the sufferer believes every random detail in the external world is a covert sign secretly pointing to them.
On the son's birthday, the parents purchase a basket of jellies to bring to him, only to be turned away at the door because the son has suffered another breakdown and refuses to see visitors. Defeated, they return home. Late that night at the kitchen table, the heartbroken father insists they must bring their son home the next morning. Suddenly, around midnight, the telephone rings. The mother answers, only to find a small girl asking for someone named Charlie. The mother explains it is a wrong number and hangs up. The parents resume discussing their plan, and just as they resolve to retrieve him at daybreak, the telephone rings a second time. Nabokov abruptly ends the story there.
When Lulu asks David for his reaction, he immediately responds with unresolved questions: *Who was the little girl? Was the second caller the girl again, or was it the hospital calling with terrible news? What happens to the son?* David observes that the narrative feels incomplete.
Lulu counters that the literary masterpiece is entirely complete—and that David's instinctive urge to solve the mystery demonstrates a profound truth about human psychology:
- **Humans innately crave narrative coherence:** When presented with disconnected data points (a hospital rejection, a jar of jellies, two telephone rings), human beings cannot treat them as neutral, isolated facts. The human brain frantically manufactures meaning to bridge the gaps.
- **Universal referential mania:** While clinically debilitating for the son, every normal human mind suffers from a mild form of referential mania. People are hardwired to believe surrounding events are interconnected and pointing toward an ultimate conclusion.
```mermaid
flowchart LR
accTitle: Narrative Vacuum vs Guided Communication
accDescr: How audience minds interpret isolated data points without a guiding narrative compared to directed communications.
subgraph Unguided["Unguided (Narrative Vacuum)"]
F1["Fact A (Hiring)"] ~~~ F2["Fact B (Funding)"] ~~~ F3["Fact C (Office Launch)"]
F1 & F2 & F3 --> Speculation["Audience Referential Mania:<br/>Wild Speculation & Misinterpretation"]
end
subgraph Guided["Guided (Go Direct)"]
D1["Fact A"] & D2["Fact B"] & D3["Fact C"] --> Frame["Founder-Led Narrative Frame"]
Frame --> Coherence["Clarity, Trust & Anticipation of What Comes Next"]
end
```
Lulu applies this directly to executive leadership and corporate communications. When founders broadcast an assortment of dry corporate milestones—hiring executives, raising rounds, opening satellite offices, or reacting to current events—the audience will inevitably weave those raw facts into a story regardless. The founder cannot stop people from inventing a story; their only lever of control is providing the connective tissue that dictates what that story is.
By taking command of "the space in between the facts," a founder gives investors, employees, and customers a satisfying sense of coherence. Leaving that space empty surrenders control of your narrative to chaos, rumor, and whatever random conclusions the public invents.
## Notable quotes
> [06:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=378s) build a movement to help their company succeed — Lulu Cheng Meservey
> [15:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=954s) one man plus the truth is a majority
> [26:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=1605s) So, you're turning a cook into a chef. — Lulu Cheng Meservey
> [33:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=2003s) Don't look happy when you're saying it. Don't be smiling when you say there's going to be a 50% unemployment rate in a year. — Lulu Cheng Meservey
> [33:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=2003s) get on the train or you're on the tracks — Eric Schmidt
> [38:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=2290s) the storyteller is the most powerful person in the world — Steve Jobs
> [40:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=2440s) The idea that they protested outside of your house and they put a f***ing guillotine in front of your house is insane to me. — David Senra
> [45:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=2730s) The Jetsons are the hero of the story. It is not called 'Show About Robots'... It's the same thing with Shopify. In the SKIMS story, Kim and Jens and their team, they're the entrepreneurs, they're the hero. Shopify is ambient, because without them, none of this would be possible in its current form. But you are not bludgeoning people with, 'This is about Shopify.' — Lulu Cheng Meservey
> [57:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=3431s) the schlubby nonsense of the thing that I did when I was six months dumber than I am now. — Lulu Cheng Meservey
> [01:00:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=3627s) These questions suck, and David would never ask these questions. These aren't good enough. — Lulu Cheng Meservey
> [01:00:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFImJfJGXl0&t=3627s) imitation is suicide — Lulu Cheng Meservey
## Mentioned
Lulu Cheng Meservey, David Senra, University of Heidelberg, University of Oslo, Rostra, Boston Consulting Group, Anduril Industries, Ramp, General Matter, Google, Alibaba, Jim Wilkinson, TrailRunner International, Citadel, S&P Global, Gap Inc., Matt Steckman, Trae Stephens, Palmer Luckey, Boeing, Raytheon, Donald Trump, Brian Schimpf, Go Direct: The Manifesto, Julius Caesar, Napoleon Bonaparte, Winston Churchill, Abraham Lincoln, Matt Grimm, Marine Corps Base Quantico, Camp Pendleton, Central Intelligence Agency, National Defense University, TechCrunch, The New York Times, Brian Armstrong, Coinbase, Pod of Jake, Tobi Lütke, Shopify, DoorDash, Vercingetorix, Joan of Arc, Field of Dreams, Eric Schmidt, Aman New York, Deel, Steve Jobs, Fidel Castro, Jeff Bezos, The Jetsons, The Terminator, Blade Runner, Neal Stephenson, The Diamond Age, Seveneves, David Ogilvy, Claude Hopkins, Albert Lasker, Harley Finkelstein, Kim Kardashian, Jens Grede, SKIMS, Standing Out, Victoria's Secret, Joe Gebbia, National Design Studio, Kelly Johnson, Skunk Works, Lockheed Martin, Cicero, Peter Thiel, Zero to One, AppLovin, Cognition, Marc Andreessen, Elon Musk, Ralph Waldo Emerson, UFC, Dana White, William Hockey, Column, Plaid, The Ultimate Fighter, Formula 1, Drive to Survive, The Wire, Urijah Faber, Vladimir Nabokov, Signs and Symbols
## Video description
Lulu Cheng Meservey is the founder of Rostra and one of the world's most trusted communication strategists, supporting companies such as Anduril, Shopify, Cognition, and Coinbase. In 2016, she co-founded TrailRunner International with Jim Wilkinson, who had just run corporate affairs for Alibaba's record IPO. She had never done comms in her life. One of her first clients was Anduril, in the company's first year, when Palmer Luckey had just been pushed out of Facebook, and no reporter would give him a fair hearing. So they stopped asking. They went to Quantico, to Camp Pendleton, to the CIA, and showed people the technology directly.
She left to run communications at Substack, then joined the board of Activision Blizzard—and in October 2022 stepped off the board and into the company as chief communications officer. Microsoft's $69 billion acquisition was under attack from the FTC. She fought back in public, under her own name, which almost no executive in a deal that size is willing to do. It closed in October 2023.
In March 2024, she started her own firm, Rostra, and published Go Direct: The Manifesto. The first project out the door was Cognition's launch of Devin, the first AI software engineer. Shopify put her on its board that June. In December 2025, she raised a $40 million fund to back founders she believes in. She takes about a dozen clients at a time and has a waiting list of hundreds.
She named the firm after the Rostra, the speaker's platform in Rome, where a man could climb up while the city believed one thing and step down after it believed another.
Show notes: https://www.davidsenra.com/episode/lulu-cheng-meservey
Made possible by
Ramp: https://ramp.com
Deel: https://deel.com/senra
AppLovin: https://applovin.com/senra
David Senra
Website: https://www.davidsenra.com
X: https://x.com/davidsenra
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/davidsenra
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidsenra
Facebook: https://www.linkedin.com/company/senrashow
Threads: https://www.threads.com/@davidsenra
Spotify: https://spti.fi/TVrr557
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/4msoZtb
Chapters
00:00:00 From China to America
00:02:08 Learning to Read the Room
00:06:18 Building a Movement
00:07:30 Learning Comms by Doing
00:10:50 Anduril as an Insurgent
00:15:07 The Power of a Manifesto
00:18:47 Go Direct
00:26:45 Conviction Over Charisma
00:31:30 Why Rostra Exists
00:33:23 How AI Leaders Lose Trust
00:40:40 Tell a Better Story
00:47:55 Do Things That Can’t Be Faked
00:50:55 The Return to Beauty
00:57:11 Originality Over Templates
01:04:02 Do What Only You Can Do
01:07:14 The Jetsons Rule
01:10:41 Trust Yourself
01:12:29 Why Humans Crave Stories
Communications strategist Lulu Cheng Meservey argues that high-conviction tech founders must bypass traditional media intermediaries to build insurgent movements, using direct storytelling and ambient narrative framing to control how audiences interpret their technology.
Bypassing Gatekeepers for Narrative Sovereignty (18:47)
Meservey defines traditional public relations as functionally obsolete for unconventional startups because third-party media filters inevitably warp contrarian ideas. Drawing on her academic training in counterinsurgency, she developed the "Go Direct" model with Anduril Industries when mainstream tech journalists were openly hostile toward founder Palmer Luckey following his departure from Facebook. Because incumbents hold superior capital, headcount, and institutional legitimacy, insurgent ventures must rely on asymmetric intensity and doctrine, publishing clear manifestos and reaching core audiences directly rather than seeking diluted press coverage.
This strategy reclaims narrative sovereignty—the refusal to outsource a company's mission to outside gatekeepers. Meservey cites Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong appearing on a niche podcast with roughly 100 listeners to reach high-signal technical peers, contrasting targeted distribution with mass television appearances. Persuasion expands outward in concentric circles, requiring the founder at the center to display deep personal conviction before expecting employees or investors to embrace high-risk ventures.
Ambient Optimism and the Jetsons Rule (39:55)
Emerging tech narratives, especially around artificial intelligence, frequently alienate the public by placing the machine at the center while treating workers as passive casualties. Meservey critiques speeches like former Google CEO Eric Schmidt's commencement address, which she argues framed students as obstacles on a track while casually predicting mass unemployment. Effective persuasion requires establishing common ground and casting human agency as the protagonist rather than bludgeoning listeners with corporate optimism.
To resolve this, Meservey proposes the "Jetsons Rule": enduring technological optimism keeps machines ambient in the background while focusing on human drama and striving. The cartoon The Jetsons treated flying cars as an ordinary backdrop to a family sitcom, just as the UFC popularized mixed martial arts by spotlighting athlete conflicts in The Ultimate Fighter. Shopify similarly highlights merchant founders like Kim Kardashian rather than centering its own platform software.
Defeating Synthetic Content with Unfakeable Craft (47:55)
In response to an ecosystem flooded with templated promotional videos, bot-amplified announcements, and synthetic marketing copy, Meservey advises founders to invest exclusively in work that cannot be faked. In her essay "Standing Out," she argues that while automated templates may raise below-average output to a mediocre baseline, they eliminate the distinctiveness required for category leadership. Drawing on Ralph Waldo Emerson's aphorism that "imitation is suicide," she refuses to use PR templates or generic AI copy.
Instead, durable credibility is built through taste, objective aesthetic standards, and real human relationships. Unfakeable tactics include hosting offline gatherings, leveraging trusted networks, and delivering concise, refined copy—as demonstrated in Rostra's web collaboration with General Matter. Meservey contends that genuine craft and beauty serve as proof of authenticity because fly-by-night operations relying on synthetic metrics will not commit the labor required to build them.
Narrative Architecture and Referential Mania (72:29)
Meservey illustrates human cognitive bias using Vladimir Nabokov's short story "Signs and Symbols," where a character suffers from "referential mania"—the delusion that disparate external events secretly refer to him. She argues that normal human psychology possesses a mild form of this tendency: when confronted with disconnected facts, audiences instinctively fabricate causal narratives to bridge the gaps.
For founders, broadcasting isolated corporate milestones—such as executive hires or fundraising rounds—without an overarching frame invites observers to invent their own narrative. Leaders cannot prevent audiences from connecting the dots, but they can provide the connective tissue that shapes the story. Meservey identifies five core strategic pillars: distinctiveness, going direct, radical simplicity, mission, and self-trust. Sustained narrative compounding requires maintaining fidelity to a core thesis across long time horizons rather than altering direction to suit transient trends.
Meservey's model assumes that an insurgent enterprise possesses a genuine, mission-driven core and a founder capable of projecting intense conviction. The source leaves open how conventional companies pursuing incremental commercial goals—without a contrarian philosophy or high-visibility founder—can adapt to an ecosystem dominated by synthetic noise and audience skepticism.
Source quotes
[6:18] Lulu Cheng Meservey: build a movement to help their company succeed
[15:54] one man plus the truth is a majority
[26:45] Lulu Cheng Meservey: So, you're turning a cook into a chef.
[33:23] Lulu Cheng Meservey: Don't look happy when you're saying it. Don't be smiling when you say there's going to be a 50% unemployment rate in a year.
[33:23] Eric Schmidt: get on the train or you're on the tracks
[38:10] Steve Jobs: the storyteller is the most powerful person in the world
[40:40] David Senra: The idea that they protested outside of your house and they put a f***ing guillotine in front of your house is insane to me.
[45:30] Lulu Cheng Meservey: The Jetsons are the hero of the story. It is not called 'Show About Robots'... It's the same thing with Shopify. In the SKIMS story, Kim and Jens and their team, they're the entrepreneurs, they're the hero. Shopify is ambient, because without them, none of this would be possible in its current form. But you are not bludgeoning people with, 'This is about Shopify.'
[43:11] Lulu Cheng Meservey: Oh, it's Ozempic for companies.
[57:11] Lulu Cheng Meservey: the schlubby nonsense of the thing that I did when I was six months dumber than I am now.
[60:27] Lulu Cheng Meservey: These questions suck, and David would never ask these questions. These aren't good enough.
[60:27] Lulu Cheng Meservey: imitation is suicide
[68:50] Lulu Cheng Meservey: Don't get ready. Stay ready
[70:41] Lulu Cheng Meservey: Trust yourself
Original transcript
[0:02] - So, you were born in China,
yet you speak Norwegian.
[0:05] Can you explain what occurred in
your life between these two points?
[0:10] - Yes. I was born in rural China.
[0:12] I was born in a little village where,
I think, my mom didn't even know whether
[0:16] I would come out as a boy or a girl,
or in 6 months or 12 months, or
[0:19] there was very little knowledge,
and so I emerged.
[0:22] And we were able to leave China because
[0:26] my father was sent to Germany
to get his PhD in astrophysics.
[0:29] I think at that time the number of
people who wanted to leave China
[0:32] far exceeded the number of people
who were allowed to.
[0:34] So technically, we were supposed
to stay behind as a
[0:38] kind of collateral to make
sure that he came back.
[0:41] However... We end up settling in Germany.
[0:44] My mom and I actually do go to join
my father at the University of Heidelberg,
[0:49] where he was getting his PhD,
[0:51] and we started moving
around to different universities
[0:55] where he would study at the University of
X, to work at the observatory.
[0:59] And so, the University of
Oslo is one of the places
[1:01] where he was sent to work on astrophysics,
[1:05] and that's where I did a lot of
my growing up, went to public school,
[1:09] and I just became a little bit Norwegian.
[1:12] - How many different countries
did you live in, then?
[1:14] - Yeah, I grew up in China,
then Germany, Norway, Canada,
[1:19] at which point we were able
to become Canadian citizens,
[1:21] which was very exciting
and welcoming for us,
[1:24] and then grand slam,
big dream, the United States.
[1:28] So, I came to the US for college,
have been here ever since,
[1:31] and a few years ago, naturalized in
the first Trump administration,
[1:34] which was very exciting for me.
[1:36] - How long have you known that
you wanted to come to America?
[1:40] Was it just for school, or did you think,
"No, I'm going to live here after"?
[1:43] - No, I just wanted to live
and be here and be American.
[1:46] It was a dream that was sort of
inherited from my father.
[1:49] If he hadn't gone to Germany,
he would have tried to go to the US.
[1:52] In fact, the only reason
he couldn't was because
[1:54] it was oversubscribed as a
destination at the time.
[1:57] So, we've had kind of a multi-generational
dream to come to the US.
[2:01] And what I'm doing now feels like
[2:04] the culmination of
multiple generations of work.
[2:07] - I consider you a very
singular player on the board.
[2:10] - Mm.
[2:10] - I don't know anybody else
who has a business like yours.
[2:12] You do the comms for some of
the greatest tech founders in the world.
[2:17] You have anywhere, you know, from
let's say 10 to 12 clients at a time,
[2:21] but you have a waitlist of 1000
companies that want to work with you.
[2:24] - A little less.
- Yeah, a little less.
[2:26] They want to work with you.
But it's always the elite of the elite.
[2:29] And a few of these people have
been on the show, for example,
[2:31] and I've talked to them
in private about you.
[2:34] So, it's an unlikely story.
[2:37] I happen to know this because
[2:37] we've spent a bunch of time
together over the last year and a half.
[2:40] But can you explain...
Okay, you go to college.
[2:42] What do you think you were going
to do when you were in school?
[2:46] - I did not know what to do.
[2:49] You and I have talked
about friends of ours
[2:51] who've known, maybe from an early age,
[2:53] that they wanted to go
in a certain direction.
[2:55] I did not know,
and I think because the thing that
[2:57] I'm doing actually has not
existed until I started doing it,
[3:00] and there are many other
things like this out
[3:02] there that don't exist until
someone starts doing it,
[3:04] so I think there's a lesson there.
[3:06] But what I really was forced to do,
[3:08] and then enjoyed doing,
was some version of
[3:11] super-duper reading the room,
and then figuring out
[3:14] how to become and speak as someone
that the room would accept.
[3:19] And as a kid moving around and always
being the weird kid with the weird accent
[3:23] and the weird clothes, it's a forced,
almost survival mechanism.
[3:28] I'll tell you a story about,
in Norway, in a second,
[3:31] how I learned this,
and when I got to Canada,
[3:33] I actually learned English
from a book called "English."
[3:38] It literally was like a
green and blue book.
[3:40] I could picture it.
[3:42] It looked like a Greyhound
bus seat type of design
[3:44] - Mm-hmm.
- called "English."
[3:45] I read it, and I was like Neo
waking up from "The Matrix."
[3:48] I was like, "I know English."
I thought I knew English.
[3:51] I actually did not, because English,
there's the book English,
[3:54] and then there's
how people actually use it, English.
[3:56] So, while I was in college,
[3:58] I did an interview with BCG or something
that the career office funnels
[4:04] you towards, and thank goodness
I did not get this role.
[4:06] Part of the reason I didn't get
the role was that they asked me
[4:09] if I had any experience doing something.
[4:13] And I said, "Yeah,
[4:14] I have had quite a bit of
experience below the belt."
[4:20] And the difference between below the belt
and under my belt is, in some ways,
[4:26] almost nothing, and in other ways,
like in that interview, everything.
[4:30] - Mm-hmm.
[4:30] - And so, even now, I feel like I'm still
learning to speak English, and adapt,
[4:36] and to think about
the fine textures of words
[4:39] and meanings in every different setting.
[4:40] - So wait, explain the connection between
[4:42] what you do in comms now with jumping
around from culture to culture.
[4:47] You said you have a story
about this when you were
[4:49] - I'll tell you the story.
- in... Yeah.
[4:50] - I'm in Norway, and I'm just desperately
trying to fit in and be a normal kid.
[4:55] When you get to the
public schools in Oslo,
[4:58] they have something called møteklassen,
which is like a welcome class.
[5:01] So, it's like a transition
halfway house for immigrants
[5:04] who can't speak Norwegian.
[5:05] And once they think you're ready enough,
they transition you out.
[5:08] So, I'm in this classroom,
and it's October and I'm trying to fit in.
[5:14] We had talked about Halloween.
Halloween was coming up.
[5:17] And in the US, you wear
your costume to school,
[5:20] and you have a little parade,
and it's awesome.
[5:21] In Norway, they knew what this was.
[5:23] So, I show up to school in a
full-body rabbit costume.
[5:29] And I mean, it's got the gloves,
it's got a tail, like, everything.
[5:34] And nobody else is wearing
any costume whatsoever.
[5:38] So I'm the new kid...
It's like the only thing worse than
[5:40] my normal clothes was a
full-body rabbit costume.
[5:44] I sat there.
[5:44] I had to hold my pencils like
this the whole day in class.
[5:48] And it just turned out that it was not
customary to wear these things to school.
[5:52] So, how would I have known
that from any of the conversations
[5:55] - Mm.
- that I'd had where people knew the date?
[5:58] I thought we were all on
the same page, guys.
[5:59] Like, it's October 31st.
We talked about this.
[6:02] And it just wasn't a thing
you did at school.
[6:04] So, the takeaway is that
there's a lot that is unspoken.
[6:08] There's a lot of context that people
just assume that you might have,
[6:11] and if you think you do
and you actually don't,
[6:15] it will be exposed in
sometimes very dramatic ways.
[6:18] - Okay, so let's jump into exactly
what you do today,
[6:21] and why you think
it is needed more than ever.
[6:24] - Mm-hmm.
[6:25] - If I walk up to you, I don't know
you at all, and I say,
[6:27] "Hey, nice to meet you, Lulu.
What do you do?"
[6:29] How do you describe what you do?
[6:30] - What I describe is that
[6:32] I help founders build a movement
to help their company succeed.
[6:40] If you are building like the seventh
B2B SaaS in a pretty crowded category,
[6:47] I'm not sure that's
the most relevant for you,
[6:50] and it's not necessarily
the thing that brings me joy.
[6:52] But if you are building something as
we've talked about Anduril,
[6:57] it's sort of easy to talk about because
[6:59] it's such a perfect case
study from the past,
[7:01] but we've talked about Ramp
or General Matter, these...
[7:04] You need to build a movement of people
to believe something counterintuitive
[7:07] because you are essentially
creating something new that,
[7:11] if it were obvious,
it would've been done.
[7:13] By virtue of it not being done,
[7:15] you now have to break through
all of the existing biases
[7:18] and rally people to you,
and these are people
[7:23] who have lots of great options that
they have to say no to, to come join
[7:27] you on this quest,
and that is building a movement.
[7:30] - So, explain the context of
[7:32] what was going on at
the time in the country
[7:35] when you started working with Anduril.
[7:36] - I had accidentally sort of become the
co-founder of a communications firm.
[7:42] And I didn't know what comms was,
and I didn't know what PR was.
[7:45] - Okay, you got to say more about that.
[7:46] If you don't know what comms and PR is,
[7:49] how do you accidentally
become the co-founder of this?
[7:51] - For grad school, I studied diplomacy,
[7:54] within which I studied
international security,
[7:56] within which I studied counterinsurgency.
[7:59] So, I really wanted to work in
and for the government
[8:03] and on security issues,
and I could not because
[8:05] I was not a citizen at the time,
so it was difficult.
[8:08] So, I ended up in Washington, DC,
doing what felt like a pretty close thing,
[8:12] which was political risk, i.e.,
[8:15] if Google is entering into Egypt
and there's a coup, what do you do?
[8:18] It's not a normal business situation.
[8:20] Or if Alibaba is having
its biggest IPO in the US,
[8:24] the things that they have to overcome
are not just normal business things.
[8:28] There are fears about China,
[8:30] which to this day continue
and many are warranted
[8:33] and about data privacy
and all these things
[8:36] Anyway, I was working on political risk
and ended up partnering with the man
[8:41] who was helping Jack Ma run their IPO.
[8:44] And he was born and bred Texan,
had worked in government,
[8:49] and had now become the head
of corporate affairs for Alibaba.
[8:54] After the successful IPO,
he decided to start a firm,
[8:57] and he asked me to go
and do it with him.
[8:59] Jim Wilkinson, someone whom I consider a
great mentor and teacher, took a bet on me
[9:05] someone who has never done this before.
[9:07] And he said,
"I think you can figure this out."
[9:09] I didn't know if I agreed,
but I went with him, and so here
[9:12] I was, the co-founder and COO of a
comms firm, and I was googling like,
[9:18] "What is PR?"
"What is communications?
[9:21] What is this?"
[9:21] And I would learn essentially
by embarrassing myself.
[9:26] We would go into meetings,
and again, credit to Jim for
[9:29] just throwing me into these situations.
[9:31] But we would go into meetings
with leaders of Citadel
[9:36] and major, serious
operations, S&P Global.
[9:40] I would say things.
Sometimes they landed.
[9:43] Other times, somebody would pull me
[9:44] aside at the end of
the meeting and be like,
[9:46] "You know, maybe fewer like
"Power Rangers" references next time."
[9:50] We had a meeting with Gap Inc.,
[9:53] where it was very clear that I didn't know
what corporate communications was.
[9:57] I thought it was like put
on a sale, a summer sale,
[10:01] and just learned the hard way by doing.
[10:04] - Your clients, in this case,
they wanted traditional PR, correct?
[10:08] - Yes.
[10:08] - Which is not what you do at all, today.
[10:10] - Currently, it's not what I do.
- Yeah.
[10:12] - When I was learning traditional comms,
it was very much wipe on, wipe off,
[10:16] what am I doing here?
[10:17] And I didn't have any credentials.
[10:20] You know, like I'm nobody.
Nobody would answer my emails.
[10:23] People didn't want to deal with me.
[10:24] Reporters didn't take me seriously,
as they probably should not have.
[10:28] So, all understandable.
[10:30] But then, I get to know Matt Steckman,
now president of Anduril,
[10:37] and Trae, chairman of Anduril.
[10:39] We were all in DC at the time,
[10:42] and Trae recommended me to
the team to handle their comms,
[10:48] and they had talked to a
bunch of people about this.
[10:51] - What was the state of their business
when this is happening?
[10:53] - It was pretty early.
[10:54] It was in the first year of the company.
[10:55] Our company was founded
around the same time as them.
[10:58] Of course, our PR firm
didn't become Anduril,
[11:00] but it was around
the same age at that point,
[11:02] and they were in the process of
defining what the company was.
[11:07] They had actually been in
semi-stealth the whole time,
[11:10] where there was the website,
and the website provided
[11:14] just enough fodder for all
these conspiracy theories about
[11:17] what is Palmer doing,
but not enough information to...
[11:21] It wasn't like today,
where you do your launch moment,
[11:24] and you have your cinematic launch video.
[11:26] It was just like the company existed,
and there were rumors and gossip about it,
[11:30] but not fully defined.
[11:31] And to their credit, they recognized
that it was time to really define it.
[11:36] - And you would compare their idea at
[11:38] - Yeah.
[11:38] - this time in history to a
counterinsurgency, correct?
[11:42] - I believe that they were
very much like an insurgent.
[11:45] - Okay.
- They were going...
[11:46] - Can you say why?
[11:46] - Yeah.
[11:47] They had a smaller team than the
people that they were up against,
[11:51] like imagine Boeing or Raytheon.
[11:54] They were going against
the grain of their community.
[11:56] So, especially in Silicon Valley,
[11:58] it was super-duper not cool
to work with the government.
[12:01] That's when Google had
employees walking out,
[12:04] protesting any involvement in
Project Maven with the DoD,
[12:07] and they didn't have access to mainstream
information propagation networks.
[12:13] For example, the media just hated Palmer.
[12:16] This was when he was kind
of persona non grata in tech
[12:19] and mainstream for supporting
[12:21] Trump and not supporting
Hillary, while he was at Facebook.
[12:25] So, it was pretty soon
after he was pushed out,
[12:27] fired for political beliefs at Facebook,
[12:29] which is kind of
mind-blowing to think today.
[12:32] But at the time, it was like,
of course, he should be.
[12:34] Of course, he should be a pariah.
[12:35] This is unacceptable for someone
to hold these political beliefs.
[12:39] And so, this was
the situation that they were in.
[12:41] And they rightfully decided
[12:43] that they were going
to take matters into their own hands
[12:45] and create their own stories and create
their own ways to get it out there.
[12:50] So, they took a massive bet on me,
which really changed my life,
[12:57] because Palmer's, sometimes
very kindly, is like,
[13:00] "You helped us with comms."
[13:01] And we're like,
"Actually, he helped me with comms."
[13:03] You know, I learned how to do
comms by working with Palmer,
[13:10] and Trae, and Brian, and Matt.
[13:12] - I have a question for you.
[13:13] The way Palmer is now, where, like,
he takes the fight to them
[13:16] - Mm-hmm.
- he goes direct.
[13:17] I know that's part of your manifesto.
Was he like that back then?
[13:20] - He still had that same fighting spirit.
[13:23] Now, the environment was different,
and so it would land differently,
[13:26] and his audience was
a little bit different.
[13:28] So, it would've looked
different on the surface,
[13:31] but I think the fighting spirit
and the instinct was there.
[13:34] And that's why
[13:35] I had this wonderful opportunity
to work with these great guys at a time
[13:39] when I was objectively
really underqualified.
[13:42] They could've gotten the best of the best.
[13:45] They could've gotten anybody.
And I will always be so grateful.
[13:48] This is why I talk all the time about
being so grateful to these guys.
[13:52] It's like you don't understand.
People don't understand.
[13:57] They enabled me to learn how to do comms.
[14:00] I would not be in this position.
[14:03] I would be at a regular PR agency
doing regular PR agency things
[14:10] if it hadn't been for this.
- Do you really believe that, though?
[14:12] And I definitely believe that,
[14:14] the influence and your appreciation
[14:15] - Mm.
- for them, but I know you too much.
[14:18] Your personality would not allow
[14:20] you to be a normal person
working in a normal company.
[14:23] Even the way the structure of
your company is
[14:26] - Yeah.
- incredibly rare.
[14:27] I actually don't believe
that you believe that.
[14:29] - Yeah. I don't know
what I would be doing.
[14:31] Maybe I would've ended up
here by some other means,
[14:34] but it's...
[14:34] - Doesn't mean you
would've found this path
[14:35] - Yeah.
- but you would've...
[14:36] You're too singular of an individual.
- I would've rage-quit
[14:38] It ended up somewhere else. I don't know
- Yeah.
[14:39] - I don't know where. I don't know where.
- For sure.
[14:41] Yeah.
[14:41] - But that is where the
lessons of counterinsurgency
[14:46] and accepting that you don't have
the mainstream information networks,
[14:51] and that you don't have a
lot of people already on your side.
[14:55] And just not relying on those
and building your own came into play.
[15:00] So, we didn't do...
- And so this is very, like...
[15:02] - Yeah.
[15:02] - I think this is, like,
the playbook for startups,right?
[15:04] So explain...
- Block and pose.
[15:06] - Yeah.
- Here we go. Let's go.
[15:08] - I love this idea of yours.
[15:10] Explain the similarities between somebody
[15:13] who has an idea to start a
company or a movement,
[15:15] which I love, the phrase you use,
and a counterinsurgent,
[15:19] and what they have in common.
[15:21] - When I was studying counterinsurgency,
[15:23] they made us pretend
to be a terrorist group.
[15:26] Because the best way
to study the thing that
[15:28] you're fighting is to understand
the thing that you're fighting.
[15:31] And so, they had us create
these mock terrorist groups.
[15:34] And you had to come up
with your mission and vision.
[15:38] You had to create your manifesto.
[15:40] We can talk about the
importance of a good manifesto.
[15:42] This is when
I got really manifesto-pilled.
[15:45] I think we're, maybe, now overdoing it.
Maybe part of that is my fault.
[15:49] But the value of a good
manifesto cannot be overstated.
[15:54] - What makes a good manifesto?
[15:56] - A good manifesto looks
at the world and says,
[16:00] "The people that we're
fighting or trying to replace,
[16:03] they have more numbers than us,
they have more money than us,
[16:06] they have more force than us,
[16:08] and today they have
more legitimacy than us.
[16:11] But we are going to beat all of
that with more intensity."
[16:17] There's a quote that's maybe
apocryphal that says,
[16:19] "One man plus the truth is a majority,"
[16:22] and I think that applies
to insurgent movements,
[16:26] where a small number of people
[16:29] who are willing to die for the
cause, in this case literally,
[16:34] and have that intensity,
intensity can overcome everything.
[16:40] There's no amount of money or incumbency
[16:46] that can overcome somebody
who wants it so much more.
[16:52] The purpose of a manifesto
is to make concrete that intensity,
[16:59] and paint for people a vision of
what the world could be, such that
[17:05] when they see it,
they are willing to leave their jobs,
[17:10] families, security, everything,
to go and make that happen.
[17:16] And a good manifesto is once you see it,
you can't get out of your head.
[17:21] You have to go do it.
So, the manifesto is the magnet.
[17:25] And if you don't have that,
[17:27] you have no right to go
up to someone and say,
[17:30] "Leave your comfortable job
and leave your beautiful family,
[17:33] and come with me on
what is probably a death mission."
[17:36] Who do you think you are?
[17:38] You have no right unless
you have articulated that.
[17:42] - I want to tell you about the presenting
sponsor of this podcast, Ramp.
[17:45] I have been reading a
lot about SpaceX lately.
[17:48] SpaceX is one of
the most valuable businesses in the world.
[17:50] And one of the main
themes in the history of
[17:52] SpaceX is constantly attacking
and questioning your cost.
[17:56] Ramp helps many of the most innovative
businesses in the world do exactly that.
[17:59] The median company running on
Ramp cuts their expenses by 5%,
[18:03] and one thing SpaceX has demonstrated is
[18:06] that a religious dedication
to controlling costs
[18:08] can help actually increase revenue,
because you can pursue opportunities
[18:12] you couldn't otherwise.
[18:14] And we see that in
the Ramp data, too.
[18:16] The median company running on
Ramp also grows their revenue by 16%.
[18:21] So, when you're running
your business on Ramp
[18:23] and your competitors are not,
you have a massive competitive advantage
[18:27] that compounds over time.
[18:28] Ramp is the only platform designed to
make your finance team faster and happier.
[18:33] Many of the top founders and CEOs
I know run their business on Ramp.
[18:36] I run my business on Ramp,
and you should, too.
[18:38] Go to ramp.com to learn
how they can help your business
[18:41] save time, save money, and grow revenue.
That is ramp.com.
[18:47] - So, you've written a great manifesto.
It's called "Go Direct."
[18:50] - Yes.
[18:50] - Okay? Can you explain the ideas that are
contained in your manifesto and
[18:53] why you think it's so important
for founders today to do this?
[18:56] - I remember trying to name the manifesto,
spent days and days,
[19:02] and then we ended up with "Go Direct:
[19:03] The Manifesto."
[19:05] It was one of those things that
you toil over for weeks, maybe months,
[19:10] and then end up writing
it in like two hours.
[19:14] The key idea in the manifesto is that
traditional PR, as we know it, is dead.
[19:22] Maybe you can see the body,
but it doesn't have a pulse.
[19:25] And it's a good thing,
because traditional PR meant that
[19:29] you would have to filter your message
through somebody else's prism.
[19:34] You would have to be dependent on
somebody else to have the goodwill
[19:38] and the alignment, and the means to
faithfully portray to the world
[19:43] what you want to say.
[19:45] That actually very rarely happens.
[19:47] If you're doing something
pretty uncontroversial
[19:50] and well understood,
that can go fairly smoothly,
[19:54] because it won't be distorted that much.
[19:56] But if you're doing something
unconventional, far outside
[20:01] the mainstream, unpopular,
[20:04] then you do not want this to be filtered
through somebody else's prism.
[20:08] And the second thing is,
[20:09] I believe that there's a lot of virtue in
being self-reliant for its own sake.
[20:14] For its own sake,
even if nothing is on the line.
[20:17] We are sovereign human beings.
We should be in control of our destinies.
[20:21] We should be in control of
our narrative destinies
[20:24] and the stories that
help us achieve the destiny.
[20:27] This is narrative sovereignty.
[20:29] You never just want to be
depending on someone else.
[20:31] And so, the manifesto was a way of
giving founders permission
[20:37] and exhortation that nobody's going
to do this for you, and that's good.
[20:43] It is in some way scary,
[20:44] but it is in some way liberating
because you're the guy.
[20:46] There's no other guy
who's going to go do this for you.
[20:48] And the same amount of seriousness that
[20:51] you apply to the product or
the code or the hiring,
[20:55] you have to be applying to your story,
and you're the only person who can say it.
[21:00] You're the only person
who can do it that effectively.
[21:03] Because you have, at the beginning,
[21:05] especially, not a lot of
evidence to back you up.
[21:08] You have your word.
[21:10] And you're going to back it up with
your personal reputation, right?
[21:13] The greatest founders that we know go to
the people that they know and say,
[21:18] "I know this sounds crazy. Hear me out.
[21:21] I'm going to do this.
We're going to do this together."
[21:24] And the other person's like,
"All right. Okay, David Senra.
[21:27] - Mm-hmm.
[21:28] - This seems okay because
you're doing it, and I trust you."
[21:32] So, there's just no other way around it.
[21:35] - So, when I read your manifesto,
[21:36] one thing I love about you, and this,
is this idea that it's a very old idea.
[21:42] You take these ideas from
history and from the past.
[21:44] - Yes.
- And so when I'm reading
[21:47] your manifesto on your
website, I'm like,
[21:49] "Oh, this is like Julius Caesar.
This is like Napoleon.
[21:52] This is like Churchill.
- Yes.
[21:53] - This is like Abraham Lincoln."
[21:55] You're just applying it to, in many cases,
the legendary tech founders of today.
[21:59] - Yeah. The reason the
company is called Rostra
[22:02] is because Rostra was the
speaker's platform in Rome
[22:06] from which place history was changed,
[22:09] and there were many times
when the mood in the city was A,
[22:12] somebody hauled themselves up
there and stood to face the crowd,
[22:19] and then they stepped down,
and the mood was B.
[22:21] And this happened after Caesar's murder.
[22:25] The city completely turned in its
perception of what had just happened
[22:29] and who was the good guy
and who was the bad guy,
[22:32] and who had legitimacy,
[22:33] because of words spoken from the Rostra.
[22:36] So, I think that we have
figured out how to relate to,
[22:42] and move and rally and gather
other people a long time ago,
[22:47] and some of that art
has been lost in recent times
[22:51] because we're just distracted
and our attention spans are shot.
[22:57] But these are all things that we
figured out a long time ago.
[23:00] - Okay, so let's go back to
where we were earlier.
[23:02] You started working with Anduril.
[23:03] This idea of go direct comes after
your experience with them, correct?
[23:07] - Mm-hmm.
- Okay.
[23:09] How did the work you were doing
with Anduril and Palmer Luckey-
[23:11] - Mm-hmm.
- shape this manifesto
[23:13] that's going to come a few years later?
[23:14] - This is necessity is
the mother of invention.
[23:16] - Okay.
- And a lot of companies now
[23:19] that consider going direct as a default,
[23:22] I believe have Anduril and Palmer and
Matt, Brian, and Trae to thank for this
[23:28] because going not direct
was actually just not an option.
[23:32] You're going to call some
mainstream reporter and say,
[23:36] "Hey, the guy who got fired from Facebook
for supporting Trump, that you hate,
[23:40] is doing a thing, and you
should hear him out,"
[23:42] just very hard to do.
[23:44] There were a really small
number of reporters
[23:47] who were fair during that
time that I remember,
[23:49] but it just wasn't the way.
[23:51] And so, we were not going the
traditional path of TechCrunch
[23:55] or what Palmer calls trying to
get the coolest startup award
[23:57] at one of these conferences.
[23:59] We were going directly to Quantico,
speaking to the Marines there.
[24:05] Palmer went to Camp Pendleton,
[24:07] going to speak at
National Defense University,
[24:09] going to speak to the CIA,
[24:11] just going to the people directly,
[24:13] literally walking into their
building and speaking to them,
[24:16] and then showing them the thing.
[24:18] And then same for recruiting.
[24:20] Instead of letting some hostile outlet...
[24:24] - Yeah, you said this before.
[24:25] - Yeah.
- Okay, you go to whatever,
[24:26] I'm just going to make it up-
- Mm-hmm.
[24:27] - New York Times, to get a message out.
- Yeah.
[24:29] - To get to the actual 200
people you want to reach,
[24:31] you're just assuming, okay,
maybe 500,000 people read the story,
[24:34] and hopefully, the 200
people you want to reach
[24:36] that actually matter to
what you're trying to...
[24:38] The impact you're trying to
have in the world get to that.
[24:39] And we're just like-
- Just tell them.
[24:40] - "Well, let's just cut that out
and just go directly to them."
[24:42] - Just tell them.
- Yeah.
[24:44] - It's like you and I both care
[24:45] about a really shockingly small
number of people's opinions,
[24:49] and these are people that,
in our case, are a text message away.
[24:54] Why would you go to
somebody else as a supplicant,
[24:59] asking them to carry
the message for you
[25:01] so that they can filter it
through their worldview,
[25:03] and then their editor,
[25:04] and then put it into their publication,
[25:06] and then hope that that spray and pray
[25:08] reaches some of the
people that you care about?
[25:10] Also, by the way, you lose...
[25:13] We were talking earlier about intensity
[25:15] and the power of intensity to
overcome a lot of other things.
[25:18] You lose the intensity along the way
because it becomes watered down.
[25:22] So, the founder relays the message
[25:25] to their PR person,
[25:29] who then puts it into their words
or tries to remember it,
[25:33] and then relays it to a reporter,
who then pitches their editor,
[25:38] and then they write it,
and then the editor weighs in,
[25:40] and then it goes out.
[25:41] And then whoever it's reaching
is trying to interpret it.
[25:46] This is why in AI right now,
it's so stark.
[25:49] You've got some AI companies who
do not need a mainstream audience
[25:54] because all they care about is
recruiting five top ML engineers,
[26:01] and they actually know who they are.
[26:03] And they're going to go, what, to...
- Good Morning America?
[26:09] - Good Morning America.
- Yeah.
[26:10] - The Kelly Ripa show.
- Yeah, what are you doing?
[26:13] - Oprah, and blast out
to some big number
[26:17] of who knows who these people are,
[26:19] as opposed to a podcast
with a lot fewer listeners.
[26:24] Brian Armstrong went to a
podcast called "Pod of Jake,"
[26:26] and it was a guy called Jake.
[26:28] And he had, I don't know, 100 listeners,
[26:30] and then afterwards,
he had 115 or something.
[26:33] But it reached people like Brian.
[26:36] Or there's a few Substacks
or there's a few people on X.
[26:41] You know where they're
getting their information.
[26:42] Just go there. Work backwards.
[26:44] - Does this require...
[26:46] Because I can't tell the
conditions in which this occurred,
[26:49] but I had the craziest experience
[26:50] where I wound up spending
eight straight hours with Palmer,
[26:53] and I found him...
[26:54] I've never met a mind that was like him.
[26:56] Unbelievably charismatic,
crazy storytelling,
[26:59] but he is an inexhaustible
mind, in my opinion.
[27:02] - He is incredible.
- I couldn't reach the bottom
[27:03] of him saying interesting shit that...
- You tapped out.
[27:06] Wait, is this when you
had to call emergency
[27:07] backup podcasters to come help?
- Okay.
[27:10] I've told you the story before.
- You had to call a friend.
[27:11] - So, no. We just happened to be with...
[27:13] It was a weird circumstance.
- Ah.
[27:14] - I can't even tell you details,
[27:16] but there just happened
to be other podcasters,
[27:18] and I was just like, "Dude,"
after three hours, I was like,
[27:19] "You've got to start asking
questions because I can't..."
[27:22] It was so wildly entertaining,
[27:23] and it's similar to, I would say,
Tobi Lütke in a different way.
[27:27] It's like you can't predict what his
response to your statement's going to be,
[27:31] and that makes a very fascinating...
[27:33] But in this case, it was like,
"Holy shit, I got to tap out on this."
[27:36] But he's also one of the most
charismatic people on the planet.
[27:40] So, does going direct only work
with that kind of founder?
[27:45] - No. It works better with
that kind of founder,
[27:49] but you don't have to have
traditional personal charisma.
[27:55] You can be more quiet,
more introverted.
[27:58] You can have a whole
range of personality types,
[28:01] but you have to have
intensity of belief in the idea.
[28:03] So, the idea has to be
fleshed out and coherent,
[28:08] and then your belief in it
needs to be unassailable.
[28:12] - So, how much of your work
is working with the founder
[28:14] to make their thinking clear enough?
[28:17] Because there's that idea
that Steve Jobs would say,
[28:20] "The simpler the idea,
[28:21] the more it'll spread," right?
- Mm-hmm.
[28:22] - And so, he would spend...
[28:24] There's actually a book on this,
an entire book on this.
[28:26] There's two books called...
One's called "Insanely Simple."
[28:28] The other one's called
"The Presentation Secrets of Steve Jobs."
[28:30] I've read both of them.
[28:31] And it was like,
"He's such a clear thinker,
[28:33] and look at the way he describes-
- Mm-hmm.
[28:34] - his products and the
way he does an interview."
[28:36] It's like there's so much
work behind the scenes
[28:37] that you're not seeing for him to-
[28:39] - Mm-hmm.
- distill his thinking down to that.
[28:41] Is that a lot of the work that
you're doing with these founders?
[28:43] - Yeah. So, I'll give you an example of
a founder that I met at an event.
[28:47] I actually don't remember his company.
[28:49] We don't work together, but that's
what makes him a good example.
[28:52] We spoke for maybe seven minutes,
and for six of the minutes, he's saying,
[28:58] "Okay, I have a business where anybody
can become their own cloud kitchen.
[29:02] There's all these people at home who
know how to cook really good food,
[29:05] and there's people who want more variety
than the stuff they get on DoorDash,
[29:08] and I'm connecting them,
and there's a network of a..."
[29:11] And there's a lot there,
and we had to distill it down.
[29:15] And I'm listening to this,
and I thought,
[29:17] "Okay, so you're turning
a cook into a chef."
[29:22] And he said, "That's it,"
and he ran with it.
[29:25] Sometimes it's just having somebody
who's not necessarily smarter than you,
[29:29] and I don't know more about the topic,
[29:30] especially some of these AI founders
who are just technical geniuses.
[29:34] But sometimes someone
sitting across from you
[29:37] can take your word cloud
of thoughts and ideas
[29:41] and suggest for you a synthesis,
[29:43] and for you to see that
coming from someone else
[29:46] makes you recognize that that
actually is the core of your idea,
[29:49] and now you have the
compressed, simple thing
[29:52] that you can share and spread.
[29:53] - Okay, so you have a simple idea-
- Mm-hmm.
[29:55] - that can spread.
- Mm-hmm.
[29:56] - You have to be...
[29:57] You're starting a movement,
[29:58] therefore you have to have
some kind of passion or very...
[30:01] It's almost like you're mission-driven.
[30:03] How many clients do you
have at this moment?
[30:05] - Over a dozen.
- Okay, oh, now we're expanding.
[30:07] Okay. So, I didn't know you're
expanding your company.
[30:09] - Yeah.
- So, say out of a dozen,
[30:11] how many of them are not mission-driven?
- None.
[30:14] - Okay. So, you need to be mission-driven.
[30:16] What other characteristics...
- It doesn't work.
[30:17] How are you going to get somebody else
to believe it if you don't believe it?
[30:20] - Okay. So, perfect.
- Right?
[30:21] - So, what I'm trying to get to is,
what are the things that,
[30:23] if the founder's listening to this,
[30:25] need to do before they can go
direct for it to actually work?
[30:29] - They need to convince themselves.
[30:32] You have to go out in concentric circles,
[30:34] and the dot inside all
the circles is just you,
[30:39] the sovereign individual,
[30:42] who believes that you're
going to lead this movement.
[30:44] If you haven't convinced yourself of
what it is and why it's worth doing,
[30:49] that you're going to
dedicate your life to it,
[30:51] it's like if Napoleon's your general,
[30:52] if he's not going to die for it,
why would you die for it?
[30:54] If he's not going to charge the bridge,
[30:55] well, why am I, some schmuck,
running across the bridge?
[30:58] Same with Julius Caesar, right?
[31:00] At the battle against Vercingetorix,
[31:02] where he came out and was the
easiest target out of anybody
[31:05] because of the way he was dressed.
[31:07] People saw him,
and they rallied back up.
[31:10] He's going to fight,
we have to fight.
[31:12] Joan of Arc, everything.
[31:13] You see the leader,
[31:15] or you see a leader doing the thing that
you now feel ashamed to not be doing.
[31:20] The person in the middle
has to be the most convicted,
[31:23] the most passionate,
[31:24] and have the clearest
idea of the promised land.
[31:27] - You know what just hit me
[31:28] while I'm listening to you speak?
- Yeah.
[31:30] - I think this is a perfect opportunity.
[31:32] Articulate why you're doing this.
[31:34] Why even start the company?
[31:36] You work like a dog seven days a week.
- Mm-hmm.
[31:38] - I call you 11:00 at night on the
East Coast, and you pick up,
[31:42] and you have a bunch of kids,
and you have this crazy life.
[31:44] - Yeah.
- So, why are you...
[31:45] What is your mission?
Why even do this?
[31:48] I think the world is better
[31:51] when we allow new technologies
to take root and flourish.
[31:56] And in my opinion,
[31:58] building the technology
[32:01] is often not as hard as getting
people to use the technology.
[32:06] It is not if you build it,
they will come.
[32:08] Which, by the way, originated
from "Field of Dreams."
[32:10] Did you know this?
- No.
[32:11] - That's the origin of that quote.
[32:12] I thought it was from
the Bible or something.
[32:14] It's from "Field of Dreams."
- No.
[32:15] - If you build it, they will come.
They're talking about a stadium.
[32:18] It is not if you build it, they will come.
[32:20] It's you might build it,
maybe nobody uses it.
[32:24] Maybe it gets regulated out of existence.
[32:27] And maybe nobody wants to come
work on this thing and you get overtaken.
[32:32] So, in my opinion,
[32:34] the greatest and most underestimated
barrier between technology existing
[32:40] and actually having an impact
is people understanding it,
[32:45] welcoming it into their lives,
and wanting to go work on it.
[32:48] And so there are a lot of
really brilliant people
[32:51] working on the engineering
and in the building.
[32:54] I don't think there's a commensurate
amount of effort and thought
[33:00] being put into the second part,
[33:02] the human part of the
equation of convincing people
[33:05] to want it and use it and work on it.
[33:08] You see that with AI today, right?
[33:11] We can build the AI.
[33:13] Is the government going to
allow it to be released?
[33:15] Are people going to use it?
[33:17] We can build data centers.
We know how to build a data center.
[33:20] What are you going to do when there's a
moratorium because people don't want it?
[33:23] - This is a perfect example.
[33:25] AI right now has the worst reputation.
[33:27] It's the worst favorability
rating of almost anything.
[33:30] You've seen people talk about
AI at commencement addresses,
[33:32] and they're getting booed out of the room.
[33:34] What would you do differently?
[33:35] Explain the problem they have right now,
[33:37] what they're doing,
[33:38] and then how you would
approach it differently.
[33:40] - A lot of the CEOs are describing
that AI will cause massive job loss.
[33:46] Most people will look at that and say,
[33:48] "Don't say that it causes
massive job loss."
[33:50] I look at it a little bit differently.
[33:52] If you believe that it'll
cause massive job loss,
[33:56] and you're in that rare position,
[33:58] I think you do have an
obligation to warn people
[34:01] and to try to get us to prepare for it.
[34:04] But the really small but
really important thing is,
[34:07] don't look happy when you're saying it.
[34:11] Don't be smiling
[34:13] when you say there's going to be a
50% unemployment rate in a year.
[34:17] Eric Schmidt doing that
commencement speech...
[34:20] - Explain the context of that
in case people haven't seen it,
[34:22] and then what he did and then
what you would do differently,
[34:24] because I'd like your response to this.
[34:25] - Eric Schmidt gave a
commencement address,
[34:28] and among other things
that were totally fine,
[34:31] he said that AI will change the world,
[34:34] and the question is whether
you will help to build it,
[34:38] and that it's going to
disrupt all of these jobs,
[34:41] and it will change the landscape.
[34:44] And I forget his exact words,
[34:46] but the vibe of it was
"It is taking away jobs.
[34:50] Deal with it, and get on the train
or you're on the tracks."
[34:54] Two things.
[34:55] One is at the center of his story,
the protagonist wasn't the human,
[35:00] and it wasn't the person
he was speaking to.
[35:02] He wasn't saying,
"You can go change the world,
[35:05] and you have the world's most
miraculous technology to use.
[35:08] Think of what you could do with this."
[35:11] Instead, he said,
"The technology," the protagonist,
[35:14] "is coming whether you like it or not.
[35:16] You are potentially in its way,
[35:17] or you can get on the bandwagon with me,"
[35:21] which is just the wrong framing.
[35:23] And then the second is when he was
talking about the possibility of AI
[35:28] essentially taking half the jobs of these
anxious graduates in the audience,
[35:32] he didn't seem upset.
[35:35] He didn't share what fear or anxiety
or didn't recognize what it would be.
[35:39] He dismissed any potential anxiety
that would arise from that.
[35:43] He sounded completely secure
and blasé about this happening.
[35:49] And so, a lot of people have
opined on the messaging
[35:55] of how you're going to
talk about job displacement.
[35:58] Are you a doomer?
Are you over-optimistic?
[36:01] And all of this aside,
[36:03] a human talking to another human
[36:07] should recognize the other
human's reaction to that news.
[36:12] And if I'm telling you
[36:14] that you are potentially going to lose
status, purpose, income, and security,
[36:22] and I seem just fine,
[36:25] and I'm smiling as I say it,
[36:28] automatically there's no trust between us.
[36:30] You don't even think of me as...
[36:32] Barely as the same species,
[36:33] but you don't think of me
as being on your side.
[36:35] And you don't assume
that other things I say
[36:39] are things that you would
agree with or relate to.
[36:42] So, the same way that if
you and I are disagreeing,
[36:44] and we're fighting, and we don't know
if we can ever get on the same page,
[36:47] the best tactic for me is to find
something that you and I agree on
[36:52] and to lay that as the foundation.
[36:54] It can be some anodyne thing,
[36:55] like you and I both really
like that hot chocolate.
[36:57] You didn't. Completely unrelatable to me.
[37:00] So, it would be something else.
- People don't understand.
[37:01] She has hot chocolate in that cup.
[37:03] Every time I see you...
[37:04] - It's what fuels me.
- It's inappropriate as an adult.
[37:05] - It's what fuels me.
- You are a grown adult.
[37:07] - It's what fuels me, and that's why-
- At every restaurant I'm at with you...
[37:10] - there's alpha in the fact
[37:11] that others don't recognize the potential
of this as a performance beverage.
[37:17] - You're a grown-up.
- See, this is why...
[37:19] - You should not be having
hot chocolate every dinner.
[37:20] - Well, this is why I don't have to
spray my nose with the zinc stuff
[37:23] because I have this.
- It's not my nose. It's my throat
[37:25] because I talk a lot.
- Yeah, well, the hot chocolate
[37:26] is helping me speak.
- I speak for a living.
[37:28] - If we were arguing, and I wanted to
get us back on the same page-
[37:31] - This was an argument.
- I would say so.
[37:32] Yeah. Well, now we have to reconcile.
- Yeah. Yeah.
[37:34] - So, now we have to be like,
[37:35] "This is a really beautiful place.
I'm glad we're here."
[37:37] Thank you for the Aman New York for
letting us shoot here, by the way.
[37:40] - Shout out, Aman New York.
- Yeah.
[37:42] - Now that we're back on the same page,
[37:44] you can assume that
things I say in the future
[37:46] are things that you
will probably agree with
[37:48] because you believe that I'm someone
with whom you have things in common.
[37:52] So, a lot of the senior people in
AI that the general public sees
[37:58] get introduced to them in a way
where they automatically believe,
[38:01] "This person has nothing
in common with me,
[38:04] and anything else they say,
[38:05] I cannot assume that I would
assess the situation the same way."
[38:10] - Deel is how the best founders turn
the world into their talent pool.
[38:13] I've been studying how history's
greatest founders operate for a decade,
[38:16] and one thing they all have in common
[38:18] is they understand that recruiting
and hiring the very best talent
[38:21] is your most important priority.
[38:23] A players recognize other A players,
which is why top companies like
[38:26] Ramp, Shopify, ElevenLabs, Uber,
and DoorDash all use Deel.
[38:30] Many of the top founders I know
[38:31] have personally invested in
Deel after using their product,
[38:35] and what they discovered is that Deel
is the best company in the world
[38:37] at building infrastructure
for global hiring.
[38:39] Deel will help your business
hire, pay, and manage any worker
[38:43] anywhere in the world
[38:44] so you can retain the best talent anywhere
[38:46] and spend the rest of your time
focusing on what you do best,
[38:49] delivering value to your customers.
[38:51] The founder of ElevenLabs
[38:52] has a great description of the
value Deel can give your company.
[38:55] He said, "We built ElevenLabs
[38:57] to break down language
and communication barriers.
[39:00] With Deel enabling us to hire and
support exceptional talent anywhere,
[39:04] we can accelerate our innovation
[39:06] and bring more voices, stories, and ideas
to every corner of the world."
[39:10] Deel is trusted by over 40,000 businesses.
[39:13] Learn how they can help your business
oday by going to deel.com/senra.
[39:18] That is deel.com/senra.
[39:22] Something that I've heard you say a few
times is that humans crave a story.
[39:26] One of my favorite all-time
quotes is from Steve Jobs.
[39:28] He says, "The storyteller's the most
powerful person in the world."
[39:31] And something that I think is important,
[39:32] because I was sitting here
listening to you when I asked you,
[39:35] "Oh, what's your mission behind,
why even do this?"
[39:37] And you were talking about the
importance of creating new technology.
[39:39] I think you and I,
[39:41] what you're doing on the PR side
[39:42] and what I'm trying to do with
the podcast is this new podcast,
[39:45] this show essentially started out
[39:46] as we should have a love
letter to capitalism, right?
[39:49] It's like, I'm the son
of a Cuban immigrant.
[39:50] My grandfather was born in Cuba.
[39:52] Castro takes over.
He's like, "This is f***ed.
[39:54] We need to get out of here."
- Mm-hmm.
[39:55] - That one decision by a man
I don't ever remember meeting
[39:58] changed the trajectory of my life.
- Mm-hmm.
[40:00] - And what's weird to me is capitalism
[40:02] seems like one of the greatest
inventions humanity ever had,
[40:04] a huge force of good,
and one of the reasons
[40:08] that America's the most powerful and
prosperous nation on the planet.
[40:11] It should be celebrated.
- Mm-hmm.
[40:12] - I remember sitting across
from Jeff Bezos one time.
[40:15] I got to talk to him for several hours,
which was incredible,
[40:17] and I told him, I was like,
[40:18] "The idea that they protested
outside of your house
[40:22] and they put a f***ing
guillotine in front of your house
[40:25] is insane to me."
- Oh, that's wild.
[40:27] - And I told him, I go,
[40:28] "You made a magic button that I can press,
and anything comes to my house.
[40:31] Used to be two days,
now it comes three hours later."
[40:34] - Yeah.
- And I was like, "That's what..."
[40:35] I was like, "You deserve all the money."
[40:37] He just laughed and laughed and laughed.
- Yeah. Yeah.
[40:38] - But I think the other story,
you don't displace...
[40:43] You can't just say,
"Oh, communism sucks.
[40:45] Look at all the people that have died.
[40:46] Look what happened in Cuba.
[40:47] Look what happened
to all these countries."
[40:48] You have to tell a better story.
[40:50] You have to give them
a better alternative.
[40:51] I feel the people in AI...
[40:53] I use AI every day.
It seems miraculous to me.
[40:55] We use it for the podcast,
I use it for learning,
[40:57] use it for entertainment,
all these other things.
[40:59] They're not putting forth a better story.
[41:02] - They're not doing it
in the right way, also.
[41:04] There are people who have painted
really wonderful, optimistic visions
[41:08] of what AI could create in the future,
[41:11] but it feels like PR,
and people write it off.
[41:14] And it feels heavy-handed.
[41:15] The last time there was a really effective
[41:19] techno-optimist message was "The Jetsons,"
[41:23] and it's because they weren't
beating you over the head with
[41:28] "Technology's going to
make your life great."
[41:30] The show was about other stuff.
[41:33] I don't know. They'd go around,
[41:35] they'd go about their day.
- The family dynamic,
[41:37] everything else.
- It was like a family sitcom.
[41:38] - But you have a robot in your
house doing all your work.
[41:39] You have a flying car.
- It was in the background.
[41:41] It was ambient.
- Yeah.
[41:42] - It was ambient and assumed.
- That's a great point.
[41:45] - Everything techno-pessimist,
[41:48] the tech is in the foreground,
and it's about the tech.
[41:51] So, "Terminator" or "Blade Runner,"
[41:54] anything where there's a future
that you potentially don't want-
[41:57] - Dystopian.
- the dystopian stories about the tech,
[42:01] the tech is the thing people focus on.
[42:05] But the utopian stories about tech,
[42:08] when you make tech
the thing people focus on,
[42:10] they write it off as PR.
[42:12] And so, I think what we want is
for the utopian stories about tech
[42:16] or the optimistic stories about tech
to have it in the background,
[42:20] just be ambient.
[42:21] A lot of people have
read sci-fi novels or...
[42:26] And sci-fi novels are usually
not about the technology itself.
[42:29] It's about a story.
[42:31] Neal Stephenson's "The Diamond Age"
is about Nell and her family,
[42:36] and "Seveneves" is about the
people being sent to space,
[42:39] and the fact that they have
technology to preserve the human race
[42:43] is in the background as an enabler.
[42:45] And these are the types of stories
that make people so inspired
[42:50] that they have now started companies.
[42:51] You and I have talked to many founders
[42:53] who have started companies
based on being inspired by sci-fi.
[42:56] Palmer is obviously one of them.
[42:58] And it's not because they're
bludgeoning you over the head
[43:01] with one specific invention.
[43:02] It's because they're
showing the better world
[43:06] and the human stories within it
with technology in the ambiance.
[43:11] - I feel like if people went back and
studied David Ogilvy, Claude Hopkins-
[43:14] - Mm-hmm.
- Albert Lasker,
[43:15] some of the greatest copywriters and some
of the greatest founders of the heyday,
[43:20] like the Madison Avenue
[43:21] of these advertising agencies-
- Yeah.
[43:23] - they just all say the same
shit over and over again.
[43:25] They're just like,
"Show the benefit."
[43:26] - Yeah.
- "Show what you're...
[43:27] - Yeah.
- Don't show your product.
[43:29] Show the change it enables."
- Yeah.
[43:31] - I think one of the best examples of this
[43:32] is if you heard the story when
Steve Jobs was really young.
[43:34] I think he was in his 20s,
and he's like the...
[43:37] He tells a story of the most efficient
locomotion for any creature on Earth.
[43:44] And it's like a man is really low
on that compared to other animals,
[43:50] but you put a man on a bike,
[43:51] and he's way more...
- See, I'm not,
[43:53] because I drink chocolate milk.
[43:54] - But he's way more efficient
than even the condor, I think,
[43:57] is the animal-
- Mm-hmm.
[43:59] - that Steve Jobs compared it to.
[44:01] But he's like, but if you put him
on the bicycle, he goes,
[44:03] "So, what I'm creating is
the bicycle for the mind."
[44:06] And then you're like,
"Oh, I want a computer
[44:08] because this now makes me more efficient.
- Mm-hmm.
[44:09] - It takes me from a slow-footed human-
[44:13] - Mm-hmm.
- to the fastest animal
[44:15] and the most efficient
animal on the planet."
[44:18] - Mm.
- That is a perfect illustration of
[44:19] I'm not selling you bits
[44:21] and bytes and RAM.
- Mm-hmm.
[44:23] - I'm saying what is going to
occur after you use my product.
[44:25] So, let's go through some examples-
- Yes.
[44:27] - because I think some of your clients,
[44:28] you're on the board of
Shopify, for example.
[44:29] - Mm-hmm.
- I think Tobi does this perfectly.
[44:32] The way he conveys what Shopify is,
[44:34] is like trying to create more
entrepreneurs in the world.
[44:37] - So, one thing I want to point out is
[44:39] talking about the change in you with
the product is exactly the right way,
[44:45] and what we were talking about earlier
[44:46] with showing technology in the
background of a human story
[44:50] and not just bludgeoning you with
the technology is more effective.
[44:53] The second thing that's really effective
about bicycles of the mind is the analogy,
[44:58] because he just saved himself
two paragraphs of explaining
[45:01] by saying the word bicycle,
[45:02] because we know what a bicycle is.
[45:04] So, I was talking to a founder
a few weeks ago, where he said,
[45:08] "We take a system that ingests the data
[45:10] and then finds the
inefficiencies and identifies..."
[45:13] And I thought about it, and I said,
"Oh, it's Ozempic for companies."
[45:16] Okay. And if you know what Ozempic is,
[45:19] then you've just saved yourself
two paragraphs of explaining,
[45:22] where you get two birds, one stone.
[45:24] You get the complexity,
[45:27] but you also get the simplicity,
and it's the best of both worlds.
[45:30] - So, give me some more
examples from some of your...
[45:33] Like, the way they
described their mission.
[45:35] They distill it down to the
existence of their company.
[45:37] What is their company
doing for the people,
[45:39] their customers, and the
people that use their products?
[45:41] - You asked about Shopify.
[45:43] And Tobi is very good at this,
[45:45] where he talks about there's
kind of two levels of Shopify.
[45:50] One is the level of this
wondrous technology
[45:53] and what it means for the world,
and in some ways,
[45:56] it is the technology
backing entrepreneurship,
[45:59] and entrepreneurship is going to be the
last bastion of human economic value.
[46:02] If they take everything from us,
we will always have entrepreneurship.
[46:06] So, Shopify is sort of like a hedge
against every job being taken
[46:10] because they can't take from us our agency
[46:12] and our ability to start new things.
[46:13] Shopify creates the technology
to make that happen.
[46:16] Shopify is infrastructure
for entrepreneurship.
[46:19] That's one level for it.
[46:20] Another level is the merchants.
[46:24] Tobi and Harley do a wonderful
job of telling the Shopify story
[46:29] through what it has
done for the merchants.
[46:32] SKIMS, successful company,
probably going IPO,
[46:37] was possible because
Kim and Jens and the team
[46:41] didn't have to sit down and say like,
[46:42] "Okay, we want to start this store,
[46:43] but first we have to figure out
how to individually do a web portal
[46:48] and payments and design and all of
these things and patch it together."
[46:51] How many people have that
as an insurmountable obstacle
[46:55] before they're able to actually
bring their business online?
[46:57] So, the story of one merchant
going from someone's dream,
[47:01] and it might be somebody
in a small town who is retiring
[47:04] and has always wanted to open
a marmalade shop or whatever,
[47:06] or maybe it's one of the biggest
celebrities on Earth launching SKIMS,
[47:11] turning that into what is
now a thriving business,
[47:15] is the best way to talk about Shopify,
[47:18] even though they're
not the hero of the story.
[47:19] So, again, we're seeing a theme.
[47:21] Same thing as what I said
previously with "The Jetsons."
[47:24] The Jetsons are the hero of the story.
[47:26] It is not called "Show About Robots."
[47:31] "The Robot Maid Series,"
[47:33] and then the Jetsons are side characters.
[47:34] They're the heroes,
the human story is the hero,
[47:37] and then the technology is ambient.
[47:38] It's the same thing with Shopify.
[47:41] In the SKIMS story,
Kim and Jens and their team,
[47:43] they're the entrepreneurs,
they're the hero.
[47:45] Shopify is ambient,
[47:47] because without them,
[47:48] none of this would be
possible in its current form.
[47:51] But you are not bludgeoning people with,
[47:53] "This is about Shopify."
[47:55] - Okay, you wrote this essay called
Standing Out" in 2026,
[47:57] that I absolutely loved.
[47:58] You talked about the
difference in strategy
[48:01] that founders should take moving forward.
[48:03] Can you lay out the thesis and the
main idea behind what you were writing?
[48:07] - This is my Philippiad for the year,
[48:10] which is this tirade I've been going on,
[48:13] which is that everything seems fake now.
[48:15] Everything is fake. Everything is fake.
[48:18] You go to some of these launches...
[48:20] First of all, every launch uses the same
slop cinematic video, same template.
[48:25] It was original a few times,
[48:27] and now it's just
like they're all doing it,
[48:30] and then half of them,
you go to the engagement,
[48:32] it's completely fake.
[48:33] You saw one from today,
I think you said, that it had like...
[48:39] - It has like a hundred likes
[48:41] but 4700 retweets.
- Yeah.
[48:44] - It's like, why are
you paying for retweets?
[48:45] - Yeah. There was another one
from a couple weeks ago,
[48:47] and then another one
from the week after that,
[48:49] and the reason we know is because
you and I have the eye to look for it,
[48:54] and also, I know who some
of these agencies are.
[48:56] I get the messages
pitching the paid promotions.
[49:00] I know the people who get the messages,
[49:02] and you can just start
to tell after a while that,
[49:05] number one,
[49:06] the amount of engagement this thing has
[49:09] is completely disproportionate
to how interesting it actually is,
[49:12] and then number two,
[49:13] when you look through the
people who are engaging with it,
[49:16] it's all some random account
in a developing country-
[49:20] - Yeah.
- that has no other tweets
[49:22] than shilling products like this.
[49:25] When that happens,
I write off the entire company as fake.
[49:28] I don't think this was a
fake video or fake engagement.
[49:32] I think to myself, "It's a fake
company with a fake founder."
[49:36] I will never buy their product,
do business with them.
[49:40] I would never recommend
somebody go work with them.
[49:42] The whole thing is fake.
[49:43] - What is the advice that
you have in the essay to do...
[49:47] Like, what would you do today?
[49:48] - You can do things that can't be faked.
[49:50] So first of all,
it's better to put out something
[49:53] that truly represents the best
version of what you are doing
[49:57] that might get lower engagement,
[49:59] but the people who are engaging
are actually real people, and they care.
[50:02] So, it's better to get 50 people
who feel like this is speaking to them
[50:08] than to get the 4,700 retweets or whatever
that you saw that seems obviously fake.
[50:13] Two is there are things
that the fakes can't replicate,
[50:17] and these things are relationships
with other humans.
[50:20] You should make sure to be telling your
friends about it, telling your contacts,
[50:25] and partnering with the people that you've
known and trusted for a long time.
[50:29] That can't be faked by
one of these fake companies.
[50:32] Another is doing things in the real world,
[50:36] where you might just bring people over
to your house and talk about it.
[50:40] Fake company can't do that.
[50:42] There's a sense of
[50:45] taste and discernment and beauty
[50:50] - Yeah, you keep...
- that I don't see in these fake things.
[50:54] They're not made with love.
[50:55] - Yeah, you keep saying that it's
going to be like a return to beauty.
[50:57] What does that mean?
- There is a return to beauty.
[50:59] People are allowed to care about
objectively beautiful things again.
[51:04] We had, probably, a decade
or the better part of a decade
[51:07] where we had to take this
aesthetic relativistic view of
[51:10] everything is beautiful in someone's eyes,
[51:13] and this piece of art that is,
like, clearly trash,
[51:18] is just as beautiful
as one of the great masters,
[51:21] or somebody who is clearly
unhealthy and unhappy,
[51:25] is just as beautiful as someone who takes
really good care of themselves and...
[51:29] - You're talking about putting obese women
on the front of a magazine?
[51:34] - Yes, like the Victoria's Secret had this
phase of obese women and men.
[51:41] Men.
[51:42] Victor's Secret. It became...
[51:47] This isn't Victor's Secret.
- Yeah.
[51:49] - But it was, for a while.
[51:51] Like, why are we all pretending?
[51:53] It was like the emperor's new clothes,
the emperor's new lingerie.
[51:56] Like, we're all pretending
that this is still sexy,
[51:58] and we're pretending that
this still looks good.
[52:00] Anyway, coming off of the back of that,
[52:02] people are allowed, now, to say,
"This is more beautiful than this,"
[52:07] and a beautiful building is
more beautiful than an ugly building,
[52:10] and a beautiful website is worth creating.
[52:13] This is what Joe Gebbia and
[52:14] the National Design
Studio team are doing is saying,
[52:18] "We believe that more beautiful
experiences on the internet
[52:21] reflect the dignity of being
an American citizen.
[52:24] And that is what we want,
[52:25] so we're going to put in effort
from the best talent in the private sector
[52:28] to go make that for you,
because it's worth something.
[52:31] We're not going to pretend
that a website has to be ugly."
[52:34] And anything, big or small,
or glamorous or very pedestrian,
[52:38] like a simple government website,
can be made more beautiful.
[52:42] And when it is,
people appreciate it so much more
[52:44] because we do have this
inherent yearning for beauty.
[52:49] And going back to
real versus fake things,
[52:52] the fake things don't have beauty.
[52:54] They're orphans in a way.
Nobody loves them.
[52:56] - Do you think an appreciation
for beauty is universal?
[52:59] - Yes.
[53:00] - It's interesting. I just read this book.
[53:02] It's the memoir of this
guy named Kelly Johnson,
[53:04] who's the one that started Skunk Works
[53:07] at Lockheed Martin.
- Mm.
[53:08] - And he talked about that.
[53:10] Like, he worked so much, and his work
was so stressful and difficult,
[53:16] he wound up having to,
like, have part of his...
[53:17] He got ulcers and had to have
part of his stomach cut out.
[53:20] Just under unbelievable pressure
that he put himself in.
[53:22] He had to find a way to
literally take him out of his work,
[53:25] so he'd like to spend time outdoors,
and he became a rancher.
[53:28] And he said, one of the most important
things that ever happened in his life is
[53:31] just the fact that he liked watching
the sunset every night.
[53:33] - Mm.
- And he's just like,
[53:34] "There's nothing more beautiful
on the planet than a sunset."
[53:37] And he's writing those
words 40 years ago.
[53:39] He's been dead for 35 years,
- Mm-hmm.
[53:43] - and it's just like,
that's still true today.
[53:44] - It is.
- It was still true in
[53:46] the time of Julius Caesar.
[53:47] Explain to me the connection
[53:49] because you talk about everything's fake,
which I agree with,
[53:52] and at the same time,
you talk about taste and beauty.
[53:55] So, explain how those things connect,
like, almost like taste and beauty.
[54:00] I think the way you described taste was,
"Taste is the recognition of beauty."
[54:05] - Mm-hmm.
- So, explain how taste and beauty
[54:07] is an anecdote to
everything being fake.
[54:10] - Well, first of all,
just on the thing about sunsets.
[54:14] The one thing more beautiful than
a sunset is a sunset with friends,
[54:18] a sunset with the homies,
- Yeah.
[54:20] - to paraphrase Cicero.
- Mm-hmm.
[54:23] - He would say something akin to,
[54:25] "It's a great joy to be looking at
the beautiful stars tonight,
[54:29] but even better to be
looking at them with you."
[54:32] Cicero in 50 BC wrote
the last great treatise on friendship,
[54:36] and we've been underestimating
the importance of it ever since.
[54:38] And so one of the other things on
the list of things that are real
[54:41] that can't be faked is friendship
[54:45] and having your friends come
along for the journey and support you.
[54:48] Now, as to the question of why
taste, beauty, discernment, elegance
[54:54] are antithetical to fake things,
[54:57] it's because fake
things are not beautiful.
[55:02] It sounds like something that
isn't necessarily true.
[55:06] Well, in theory, someone could
create something that's fake,
[55:09] and it could be beautiful.
[55:10] In theory, yes,
but it hasn't been done.
[55:13] In practice, I have not seen
a company or a project
[55:19] that wasn't real,
that was also beautiful.
[55:24] So, I can't explain the mechanism,
[55:26] but empirically, it is the case that
fake things do not turn out beautiful.
[55:30] And I think it's because no one has
put that love and care into them,
[55:33] because why would you put
the love and care
[55:36] if you are just going to buy
the engagement anyway?
[55:41] On the flip side, it's that
beautiful things can't be faked.
[55:46] You know, beauty is a scoreboard.
It's a very obvious scoreboard.
[55:49] Someone who is healthy,
who takes care of themselves,
[55:52] you see it right there.
[55:53] You can't pretend.
[55:55] And so, I think beauty is sort of like
a stamp of authenticity.
[55:59] - What's the business version of that?
What is beautiful?
[56:02] Use an example of one of your clients,
[56:05] like the effort they put into making
their product more beautiful.
[56:09] What would be something we compare it to?
- I would suggest go to
[56:13] General Matter's website.
[56:15] We and they and a talented team that
[56:18] slaved over this website
for a long time.
[56:23] You know, some slaved more than others.
[56:24] I'm not saying I was in the minds
making the website,
[56:26] but we all put so much thought
and so much care into it,
[56:29] and then argued back and forth,
probably longer than we should have.
[56:32] And you see it,
and it's so simple.
[56:37] And then you go into the mission
and the manifesto,
[56:40] and it's so short.
[56:42] And it took a lot of people...
[56:44] I mean, the billable hours
and cumulative IQ points
[56:49] that were spent on this are unfathomable.
[56:51] And it ends up with something that is
so simple, so elegant, in my opinion,
[56:56] but you wouldn't have gotten there
without going through that journey.
[56:59] Now, if somebody had just thrown up
some kind of slop site and
[57:04] vibe-coded the thing and put a bunch of
random words that Claude wrote up there,
[57:09] I don't think you would get
[57:10] the same feeling from it.
- Or even worse, used a template.
[57:13] You're anti-template.
- Mm.
[57:14] - I've heard...
- I'm anti-template.
[57:16] - This is one of the most
interesting ideas, explain this.
[57:18] - I do not use templates.
[57:19] - Okay. But people come to you and
they're like, "Okay. Well, I'm a company."
[57:21] - Yeah.
- You work with other companies.
[57:23] They had this problem.
[57:24] I'm sure you have some kind of
template for this problem.
[57:26] You're like, "No, we're going to start
from a blank sheet of paper."
[57:28] Explain your thinking on this.
[57:29] - Two reasons.
[57:30] One is, yeah, I do get
asked for templates a lot,
[57:33] and I always say I don't have templates.
[57:35] I actually have to resist the temptation.
[57:38] I have to pass the marshmallow test
to save myself time by using templates.
[57:42] I can make my life easier and have
20 more minutes at night to read
[57:45] by using more templates.
[57:47] And the reason I resist it is,
number one, no two situations are the same
[57:52] and by pretending that they are,
we miss that texture.
[57:55] At the beginning of this conversation,
[57:57] we talked about context and
texture and respecting that,
[58:00] that alpha comes from
the little cracks in reality
[58:03] that only you can see
and that you can exploit.
[58:06] And if you are just plastering over that
with a templated version of something else
[58:10] you are sacrificing the
opportunity to be better.
[58:13] And I am sacrificing the opportunity to be
better than my own work of six months ago.
[58:18] Why do I want to settle
for the schlubby nonsense
[58:22] of the thing that I did when I was
six months dumber than I am now?
[58:26] I'm not going to do that.
So, I don't use templates.
[58:28] The second reason is
[58:32] we've talked about things
that are inherently valuable.
[58:35] Inherently valuable, to me,
is the idea that
[58:42] everything deserves originality,
[58:48] and that there's a
shortage of it in the world.
[58:50] Anything worth doing deserves originality.
[58:53] Now, if there's a founder
that I literally didn't care about,
[58:57] by definition, I would never work with,
maybe I would toss them a template.
[59:00] But anybody that I care about,
[59:03] I would be insulting them
by taking the shortcut
[59:08] and discounting their originality,
[59:10] and I would be insulting my own ability
to continue generating new ideas.
[59:16] - I found one of my
all-time favorite quotes
[59:18] when I was reading the book "Zero to One."
[59:19] The quote says,
[59:20] "The single most powerful
pattern I have noticed is
[59:22] that successful people
find value in unexpected places.
[59:26] And they do this by thinking about
business from first principles
[59:30] instead of formulas."
[59:31] That is exactly what AppLovin has done
with their advertising platform.
[59:34] AppLovin connects you with over
a billion potential new customers
[59:38] inside mobile games.
[59:40] AppLovin allows you to capture
undivided attention.
[59:43] AppLovin ads are full-screen video ads
[59:46] that are watched for
an average of 35 seconds.
[59:48] That is retention that blows
other ad platforms out of the water,
[59:52] and you can launch on AppLovin in minutes.
[59:55] You set the goal,
and AppLovin achieves it.
[59:58] There's no complex setup,
no expertise needed,
[60:01] and Applovin scales quickly.
[60:03] They can put your ads in front
of over a billion potential customers.
[60:08] Other businesses
have seen immediate results,
[60:11] have scaled to hundreds of thousands
of dollars of spend per day,
[60:14] and increased their revenue by millions.
[60:16] So, you want to get started quickly
[60:18] before all of your competitors
are on AppLovin.
[60:20] And you can do that by going to
applovin.com.
[60:23] That's applovin.com.
[60:27] - I don't know if you're going to remember
this, but hearing you speak right now,
[60:30] there are actually
templates in communication too,
[60:33] which you see this with...
[60:34] There can be auto-complete because we just
say the same stuff over and over again.
[60:37] So, you and I were at...
[60:39] We were doing this event.
[60:40] Cognition is a customer of yours.
[60:43] I'm friends with two of the founders.
[60:45] They asked me to come to this,
actually, by pure chance,
[60:48] this same hotel we're in today.
- Was this the thing where
[60:50] I sent that email?
[60:51] - I'm going to get to there. Exactly.
- Oh.
[60:53] - Good, you do remember this.
- Oh, okay, okay. I remember.
[60:55] - So they're like,
[60:56] "Hey, will you come to this event
and interview two founders for us?"
[60:59] I'm like,
"Yeah, I love you guys. That's fine."
[61:01] And I don't check my email.
[61:03] I push everything to text.
[61:05] And my email is just like,
I literally just don't read it.
[61:08] And I just happened to see
one pop-up, and it says "Lulu."
[61:11] And I'm like,
"Oh, I'll read Lulu's email."
[61:13] I'm like,
"I'm not reading this other stuff."
[61:15] And in this email, this had gone back
and forth for, like, I missed the thread,
[61:19] and I guess this other founder's
normal PR person
[61:22] had sent over a list of questions.
[61:24] Like, this is the questions that David...
[61:27] We want David to ask the founder,
[61:29] which is like, first of all,
you're f****** crazy if you think
[61:32] you can control what's going to
come out of my mouth.
[61:34] And you jump in this, you're like,
"These questions suck,
[61:37] and David would
never ask these questions.
[61:39] These aren't good enough."
[61:41] But I realize, and then you read them,
[61:42] it's just the most bland, boring,
- They were terrible.
[61:45] - templated shit that you've ever seen.
[61:47] It's like, I think there is something...
[61:49] Why are we attracted to
people like Palmer Luckey?
[61:52] We had Marc Andreessen
on this podcast, and I was like,
[61:55] "I think the two best podcast guests,
at least business-wise,
[61:57] in terms of what comes out of their mouth
and how they're able to speak is,
[62:00] " I told Marc, it's like,
'You and Palmer Luckey,'
[62:03] because they're so fascinating
and entertaining to hear speak.
[62:08] - Mm-hmm.
- And a part of it is
[62:10] because they're not...
[62:11] It's impossible to say that either of them
or any of the good communicators,
[62:15] even Elon or anybody else like that,
is speaking in template form.
[62:19] They are truly unique and kind of
- Mm-hmm.
[62:20] - leaning into what makes them unique.
[62:22] - When you use a template,
[62:24] you are giving up on the possibility
that you could be better.
[62:28] And I say this sometimes about AI writing.
[62:30] You know, AI is a wonderful tool;
I use it all the time.
[62:32] But if you are relying on AI to write
for you and to generate ideas for you,
[62:38] you are putting yourself at sea level,
[62:41] or you're putting yourself at the level of
anyone else in the population
[62:46] who wants to pay fractions
of a cent for a token to get
[62:48] the same output
from the same shared brain.
[62:53] So, if you are far below average,
you should do that.
[62:58] Because average is better than you.
[63:00] But if you believe that you can be
even a little bit better than average,
[63:07] you would be robbing yourself to do that.
[63:10] And actually, Ralph Waldo Emerson
calls it a form of suicide,
[63:15] because in imitating others,
which is what a template is,
[63:19] you are killing your own ideas.
You know, what are we...
[63:25] What are we
if not a unique combination
[63:30] of beliefs, ideas, feelings?
[63:34] Like, if you were really to unpack
the soul that we have,
[63:38] it's these things.
[63:40] I believe that there's a
more special spark of life, too,
[63:42] but if you take that and you mute it,
[63:47] you are killing a really
sacred part of yourself.
[63:49] So, I can understand why he
would say imitation is suicide.
[63:52] And using templates is
robbing yourself of the possibility
[63:57] that you could ever be better
than the last thing.
[64:01] And that's a shame.
[64:01] - Okay, so you're the world's
leading expert in terms of
[64:06] founder, CEO comms, right?
[64:09] You also do crisis comms
[64:10] for the same companies as well.
- Mm-hmm.
[64:11] - So, I need to make sure I understand
the way you think about this,
[64:16] based not only on the work you've done in
the past and the clients that I know of,
[64:20] but also this essay
that you wrote where...
[64:22] Is the proper reading of that essay,
that everything is fake,
[64:26] is that you need to lean into the more
distinct parts of yourself?
[64:30] - Mm-hmm.
[64:31] - Is that what you're doing
with your customers?
[64:32] Or your clients, rather?
[64:33] - Yeah.
[64:34] I am leaning into things
that only I can do.
[64:37] And there are people,
many of them,
[64:40] who are smarter than me,
or more sophisticated or better connected,
[64:44] or have more experience,
or whatever it is,
[64:45] but the combination of things that,
together, I feel uniquely suited to do,
[64:51] I need to do as much of that as possible,
[64:54] and it has to be me.
[64:55] There are a million ways
you could get something else from not me.
[65:00] But if you want to build a movement
around a technology
[65:06] that has civilizational importance,
[65:08] this is what I'm here to do.
This is what I live to do.
[65:11] You know, it's sort of like your thing.
You've got the one thing.
[65:13] I'm not trying to compete with
other people doing other things.
[65:18] It's like this specific thing.
[65:20] And any of the founders
that we're talking about,
[65:23] they have been put on earth to do a thing
that needs doing.
[65:28] They're the ones.
[65:29] Why would you ever put yourself on the
same level as something that can be faked?
[65:34] And now that we are inundated
with all of this fake bullshit,
[65:40] it is really important to stand out,
so that you can attract your people.
[65:43] You kind of have to fight your way
through the fray and through the noise
[65:46] to even get their attention,
[65:48] and that's another part of it, too.
[65:49] - Do you know who Dana White is?
- Mm-hmm.
[65:51] - Okay.
- Yeah, I saw your...
[65:52] - Yeah, I think he's
a perfect example of this.
[65:55] I would tell a lot of founders you should
just go watch his press conferences.
[65:58] I don't care if you don't like fighting,
[65:59] that's fine.
- Mm.
[66:00] - Just watch the press conferences
he does after the fights,
[66:03] - Yeah.
- and that's how you should communicate.
[66:04] There are two things that came to mind
when you were just speaking.
[66:06] One, he has this idea where
the most important thing
[66:08] is that you have to know who you are.
[66:09] That's step one.
[66:10] He's like, "Don't do anything else
until you figure out who you truly are."
[66:13] And two, figure out
what you truly want to do in life.
[66:15] And he goes,
"Once you make those two decisions..."
[66:17] He's got this simple genius.
[66:18] So then you just wake up every day
and get after it.
[66:20] - Mm-hmm.
- Like, you already know who you are,
[66:21] and what you want to do, so you just do
that every day and you never stop.
[66:23] - Mm.
[66:24] - And I think those two things,
like, knowing exactly who you are,
[66:26] what you want to do, and then finding that
opportunity that only you can do,
[66:30] - Mm-hmm.
[66:30] - that is the most important thing
if you're trying to do great things,
[66:33] and distinct things in the world.
You have to do those first.
[66:36] - Yeah. And sometimes when you see
repeat entrepreneurs who are successful,
[66:40] it is a version of that company.
[66:43] So William Hockey,
who did Plaid, now doing Column,
[66:46] feels like a natural evolution
of one big mission for his life.
[66:51] I think that it's possible
to have multiple companies,
[66:54] but one meta company, if you will.
[66:58] I always ask these kind of founders,
[66:59] - Yeah.
- like, what's the last company?
[67:01] - Mm-hmm.
[67:03] - You can see it in
a lot of these examples.
[67:05] You had to go through these experiences,
[67:06] but there's one company
- Yeah.
[67:08] that you wouldn't sell.
[67:10] This is the last thing I work on.
- Mm-hmm.
[67:12] - And I think that's when
you've truly found your mission.
[67:14] - What you said about Dana White
reminds me of something,
[67:16] which is I actually use Dana White,
shout out Dana,
[67:20] as an example of what we
talked about earlier,
[67:23] where you're not hitting
people over the head
[67:25] with the overt PR messaging
that they're going to write off.
[67:28] You have the human story,
[67:30] and then the thing that you're trying to
sell is sort of in the background.
[67:33] So, maybe we call this
the Jetsons Rule.
[67:36] - Mm-hmm.
[67:37] - He did this with MMA.
[67:39] That was the reality show.
[67:42] Before, watching MMA was mainstream,
[67:45] humans being interested in the lives and
striving of other humans was mainstream.
[67:49] It always has been.
[67:51] And so, the reality show gave us a way
to follow along on the human journey
[67:56] of people training for these fights,
[67:59] and MMA was ambiently in the background.
[68:03] And if you watched a season of this,
you got to know MMA.
[68:06] It's like people who watch,
I guess, F1,
[68:08] they just get to know the show.
[68:11] The show.
- Netflix... Yeah, whatever it's called
[68:12] - The series.
- "Driving to..." Whatever.
[68:14] - Yeah.
[68:15] - I watched it, and I can't remember.
- Yeah, yeah.
[68:17] - But you learn...
- That got me in F1.
[68:18] Yeah, I didn't care about F1
[68:19] until I watched that.
- Yeah. This is why I learned
[68:21] drug dealing from "The Wire"
[68:22] - Yeah.
- in the background.
[68:23] - Yeah.
[68:23] - I'm kidding. I'm not a drug dealer.
- No, no.
[68:26] - Many examples of this, where you
actually become interested in a thing
[68:30] and absorb it, because it's around
the other stuff that you're interested in.
[68:34] - The thing with Dana was interesting.
[68:36] We talked about this off-camera,
I think, after we recorded,
[68:38] but you and I just had lunch,
and we talked about the fact that
[68:42] learning from history
is a form of leverage,
[68:44] and that time is really the
only filter you can trust,
[68:46] and that if you wanted to know about
persuasion or a certain movement,
[68:49] go read Cicero.
- Mm.
[68:50] - There are just these ideas;
everything has been kind of solved.
[68:52] You just have to go find them.
[68:53] One thing that Dana told me that was
interesting is that everybody told him,
[68:56] "This isn't going to work. No one's going
to watch these people fighting,"
[68:58] and he's just like,
"It's going to go everywhere,"
[69:01] because for all of human history they...
- We love watching people fighting.
[69:04] - Go back thousands of years, it's like,
you have two men, usually two men,
[69:09] like, they're going to come to
some kind of combat.
[69:12] - Mm-hmm.
- And the great thing about his sport,
[69:14] which he realized that
he could be global from day one,
[69:15] is that you don't have to
speak the same language.
[69:18] - Yeah.
- It's like, I could watch it
[69:19] as an American,
you could watch it as a Brazilian,
[69:21] you could watch it as a Chinese.
[69:22] We're watching the same thing,
and we still understand what's going on.
[69:24] And he's just like,
- Yeah.
[69:25] - "No, of course this is going to work."
[69:26] - Yeah. With my first company, the one
where I was learning comms on the fly,
[69:30] for our company retreat, we actually
went to go train with UFC fighters,
[69:34] and we trained with the
team of Urijah Faber
[69:36] who is now in the Hall of Fame
[69:37] - Mm-hmm.
- and created and pioneered
[69:40] the bantamweight category.
[69:41] And he and his team spent the day
training with us, you know, physically,
[69:44] but also just talking
about their mindset.
[69:47] And one of the things that
stuck with me the most is
[69:50] "Nobody owes you anything."
[69:53] There are guys who show up at their gym
with a backpack coming from Brazil,
[69:58] because this is the only thing that they
want to do or know how to do,
[70:02] and they're going to do this,
and they don't need
[70:05] a lot of infrastructure around them.
[70:07] They don't need something
to tell them that they're ready.
[70:10] They're just going to go do it now.
[70:11] And then the other thing that
they talked about was
[70:14] sometimes your big break is being called
up for a fight on last-minute notice,
[70:20] because you're not the person
in the big letters,
[70:23] but you're hoping to be, and if the person
is hurt or drops out or whatever it is,
[70:27] which sometimes happens,
you might get a call on short notice,
[70:30] and that is your moment.
And you have to be ready for that moment.
[70:33] And so their mantra was,
"Don't get ready. Stay ready.
[70:36] And your big fight could happen anytime,"
[70:38] which I think is a good
guiding principle for life.
[70:41] - Okay, so I have these
conversations selfishly,
[70:44] because I get to sit across
from world-class experts,
[70:47] and essentially just pepper them
with questions,
[70:48] and I'm looking for ideas
that I can then just apply to my business,
[70:51] and then the people listening
hopefully do the same.
[70:52] So, usually, great founders build
their careers off a handful of ideas.
[70:57] It's not f****** 20.
It's five or four or three.
[71:01] So, when I think about you,
I'm thinking about, okay,
[71:04] let me summarize your handful of ideas,
[71:06] and you tell me if I'm missing some,
or if I'm wrong on any.
[71:08] Number one:
Lean into what makes you distinctive.
[71:10] - Mm-hmm.
[71:11] - Two: Go direct,
and not in any particular order.
[71:14] Three: You have to simplify your message
so it spreads, right?
[71:21] And then four:
You have to have some kind of mission.
[71:23] - Mm-hmm.
- What am I missing?
[71:25] - Trust yourself.
[71:26] This sounds very self-help,
kind of cheesy,
[71:30] but this is the message that
you need to believe in yourself
[71:33] versus 100 other people, 1,000 other
people, millions of other people.
[71:38] You need to have the actually
insane confidence in your idea
[71:43] that you're willing to trust one person
over everybody else.
[71:47] That is very hard to do, right?
[71:49] If you're looking at any kind of scenario,
[71:51] and there's one guy saying this and
a million people saying it can't be done,
[71:55] you might want to side with
the million people.
[71:57] But like we said,
one man plus the truth is a majority,
[72:00] and you have to believe
that you're that person
[72:02] and that what you're seeing is the truth,
and you have to pursue it.
[72:05] And then you have to stay with it, because
you can't compound something that changes.
[72:09] The way compounding works is that
it has to be a set principle
[72:13] that then compounds,
and if you change what that thing is,
[72:16] you start the clock again.
You start the compounding over again.
[72:19] It's not compounding.
[72:20] Compounding is incompatible with changing
the thing that you're compounding.
[72:26] So, I would say that
that's the that's the fifth point.
[72:30] And then one other,
I'll tell you what the takeaway is,
[72:33] but I'll actually illustrate it for you.
[72:34] I'm going to tell you
about a sequence of events,
[72:37] and then you're going to react to it.
[72:39] There's a man and a woman, sort of older,
and they're immigrants from Europe.
[72:45] They're living in the US, I forget where,
but they don't have a lot of money.
[72:50] Their son is in an insane asylum,
[72:54] and it's his birthday.
[72:56] He's been put in this asylum
because he's suicidal.
[73:02] He has this mental illness, a form of
schizophrenia or something adjacent.
[73:07] It's called referential mania,
and so he's super paranoid.
[73:10] It means that he thinks that everything
that happens has something to do with him,
[73:14] and he sees conspiracies everywhere.
And so, he is tortured by this.
[73:20] It's his birthday, and so they go,
and they buy him a birthday gift.
[73:24] They're trying to figure out
what to get him,
[73:25] so they get these jellies,
and they go to take it to him,
[73:28] and the asylum won't let them come in.
[73:31] They say, "I'm sorry.
He's had another attempt recently.
[73:35] He doesn't want to see you."
[73:37] So, they go home, and that night,
they're thinking about their memories,
[73:42] and the father says,
"We have to get him out of there."
[73:46] So, they're at the kitchen table.
It's really late.
[73:49] It's midnight or something.
[73:51] And the phone rings,
[73:54] and they're surprised.
[73:57] The woman picks it up,
and there's a little girl.
[74:01] The little girl says, "Charlie?
I'm looking for Charlie."
[74:04] And the woman says, "No, sorry,
you must have dialed the wrong number,"
[74:08] and she hangs it up,
[74:09] and she and the man
continue their conversation,
[74:11] and she says, "In the morning,
we'll go get him out."
[74:15] And then the phone rings again,
and it's the end of the story.
[74:18] - What do you want me to do with this?
[74:20] - Tell me your reactions to the story.
[74:23] - I don't have one.
[74:24] - What are your questions?
[74:25] - It's incomplete.
- What are your thoughts?
[74:27] - Who was the little girl?
Who's the person who called back?
[74:30] Was it the same little girl?
What happens to their son?
[74:33] - It's not incomplete.
It's a complete story.
[74:36] It's a story called "Signs and Symbols"
by Vladimir Nabokov,
[74:40] and I think the message from that story is
[74:45] if we don't have a coherent story,
[74:49] we desperately try to fill it in.
[74:52] If we're not given a story,
we try to make a story out of it.
[74:55] What I told you was a bunch of facts,
each of which could have stood alone.
[74:59] You know, wrong numbers
happen all the time.
[75:01] Who do we care who's the little girl?
It's just a wrong number.
[75:04] - Mm-hmm.
[75:05] - What happens to the son?
I mean, either he lives, or he dies, or...
[75:08] I just told you a bunch of information.
Just take that information and go.
[75:11] But we can't.
[75:13] I read that story before bed,
and I stayed up
[75:16] thinking about all of the
possible things it could mean,
[75:19] and in the story,
there's way more detail.
[75:20] You can pick at things,
like the color of the jellies and
[75:23] - Hmm.
- he forgot the keys, and all of this.
[75:26] And what it says to me is that
we all have a form of referential mania.
[75:32] You know, we actually have what,
in this young man,
[75:35] was a severe mental illness,
but we have a version of it,
[75:38] which is we need to believe that things
around us are pointing to something,
[75:43] and if we're not told what that is,
we will try to fill it in ourselves
[75:48] because our brains crave a story.
[75:52] So if you're a founder
[75:54] and you're giving people
a bunch of information,
[75:57] "This is what we do. I hired this person.
We're opening an office here.
[76:02] Here's some current events.
We fundraised."
[76:05] People will weave that into a narrative,
whether you want them to or not.
[76:11] So, that's not in your control.
[76:12] The thing in your control is whether
you get to decide what that story is,
[76:16] and fill it in for them, and give them
a sense of satisfaction
[76:19] and completion and feeling like,
"Okay, I understand it.
[76:22] Here's where this is going.
Therefore, here's what likely comes next."
[76:25] You know, if I had told you this story
in a slightly different form,
[76:29] you would have maybe assumed...
[76:31] I could have told you
the same facts in a different way
[76:34] that would make you assume that
the son was going to meet a bad end,
[76:40] or that there would be a
happy ending, or whatever.
[76:42] I could have made you believe any of
those things with the same set of facts.
[76:46] And this is what the founders
often are not paying enough attention to.
[76:50] It's the space in between the facts
[76:54] that ties them into a story
that is our responsibility to fill in,
[76:59] because if you let people
fill it in haphazardly,
[77:01] they might end up with any conclusion
that you don't control.
[77:04] - I think it's a perfect place to end.
Lulu, thanks for doing this.
[77:07] - Thank you.
[77:08] - I hope you enjoyed this episode.
[77:09] Please remember to subscribe wherever
you're listening and leave a review,
[77:12] and make sure you listen to
my other podcast, Founders.
[77:14] For almost a decade, I've obsessively read
over 400 biographies
[77:18] of history's greatest entrepreneurs,
[77:20] searching for ideas that
you can use in your work.
[77:22] Most of the guests you hear on this show
first found me through Founders.