Economists Rebuke Stiglitz Over Degrowth Push Citing Poverty Risks

Sabine Hossenfelder

Degrowth theory relies on ideological opinion rather than empirical modeling, ignoring technological decoupling and threatening human welfare by attacking the primary driver of global poverty reduction.

AI-assisted summary of Degrowth Just Got a Brutal Reality Check — original source. Check the original for full context.

Source published: 2026-09-21

Key ideas

A Guardian op-ed co-authored by Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz argues that economic growth is a doomed strategy, reigniting debate over the degrowth movement. (0:00)
A 2024 literature review revealed that approximately 90% of published academic papers on degrowth are opinion pieces rather than empirical economic research. (0:00)
Mainstream economists strongly reject degrowth claims, noting that global poverty reduction over the past 50 years directly correlates with GDP expansion. (2:21)
Environmental economics demonstrates that economic growth can be decoupled from emissions and material resource consumption through technological efficiency. (4:02)

Detailed notes

## Background Published on YouTube by Sabine Hossenfelder on September 21, 2026, this video examines the degrowth movement following a Guardian op-ed by prominent economists, including a Nobel laureate, claiming economic growth is a doomed strategy. The channel description notes that after falling into the rabbit hole of what the movement actually publishes, Sabine concluded that the ideology behind degrowth is misguided and dangerous.

## TL;DR Sabine scrutinizes the academic and philosophical foundations of the degrowth movement, highlighting that roughly 90% of its published literature consists of ideological opinion rather than empirical economic modeling. She refutes claims that growth has uncoupled from human well-being, pointing out that global poverty alleviation has historically depended on economic expansion and that growth reflects value creation rather than raw material depletion. Highlighting mainstream economists who push back against degrowth, she emphasizes that decoupling carbon emissions from GDP growth is achievable, warning that suppressing economic activity through degrowth threatens modern human prosperity.

## Atmosphere & style The video carries Sabine's trademark blend of dry wit, sharp skepticism, and pragmatic exasperation. Moving quickly from bemusement at intersectional academic jargon to incisive economic critique, her delivery feels like a brisk, reality-check lecture designed to puncture fashionable theoretical bubbles with empirical facts. The overall tone is urgent yet analytical, leaving viewers with a grounded appreciation for decentralized economic systems over top-down ideological experiments.

## Bulletin - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=0s) A Guardian op-ed co-authored by Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz argues that economic growth is a doomed strategy, reigniting debate over the degrowth movement. - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=0s) A 2024 literature review revealed that approximately 90% of published academic papers on degrowth are opinion pieces rather than empirical economic research. - [02:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=141s) Mainstream economists strongly reject degrowth claims, noting that global poverty reduction over the past 50 years directly correlates with GDP expansion. - [04:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=242s) Environmental economics demonstrates that economic growth can be decoupled from emissions and material resource consumption through technological efficiency.

## Key takeaways - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=0s) The degrowth movement argues that continuous economic growth is unsustainable on a finite planet, echoing the Club of Rome's 1970s report, 'The Limits to Growth'. - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=0s) Over the past decade, modern degrowth literature has merged heavily with intersectional academia, frequently framing capitalism alongside patriarchy, extractivism, and colonialism. - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=0s) Publications such as The Degrowth Journal require editorial candidates to align with explicit anti-capitalist ideology, compromising traditional standards of scientific objectivity. - [02:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=141s) The assertion that growth has decoupled from shared prosperity is contradicted by global data showing steep declines in poverty where economies expand. - [02:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=141s) Poverty persists primarily in regions suffering from stagnant economic growth rather than in those experiencing expansion. - [02:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=141s) Degrowth conflates physical material consumption with economic value creation, which expands through technological innovation and resource efficiency. - [02:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=141s) Attributing poverty solely to capitalism ignores contributing factors such as government policy, war, debt, natural disasters, and misguided economic ideologies. - [04:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=242s) Legitimate environmental economics focuses on decoupling, with several developed nations having proven that GDP can grow while carbon dioxide emissions drop. - [04:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=242s) Academic economists have pushed back strongly against the Guardian piece, labeling its underlying scholarship sloppy and noting that growth is the only historically proven anti-poverty program. - [04:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=242s) Empirical studies confirm that virtually every cross-national metric of material well-being strongly correlates with GDP per capita. - [04:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=242s) Capitalism serves as a vital self-organizing system for decentralized resource allocation, making deliberate degrowth a dangerous threat to human welfare.

## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=0s) The Resurgence of Degrowth and Academic Ideology

The Guardian ran an article with the provocative headline: *"We economists have done the maths: growth is a doomed strategy."* Among the co-authors is Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel laureate in economics. Sabine views this group of "degrowthers" as dangerous. At its core, degrowth is the premise that economic growth is inherently unsustainable and that humanity must halt its aspiration for expansion to preserve the environment and prevent self-destruction. The concept is not novel; it traces directly back to the early 1970s and the Club of Rome’s famous report, *The Limits to Growth*, which argued that because the Earth and its resources are finite, economies cannot expand indefinitely.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Evolution of the Degrowth Ideology accDescr: Diagram tracing degrowth from the Club of Rome to modern academic intersectionality.

subgraph Origins["1970s Foundation"] CR["Club of Rome: 'Limits to Growth'"] --> LF["Finite planet implies finite economic expansion"] end

subgraph ModernShift["Past Decade Evolution"] LF --> Merge["Merged with intersectional academia"] Merge --> DJ["Degrowth Journal & Degrowth.info"] DJ --> Beliefs["Frames capitalism as extractivism, colonialism, & patriarchy"] end

subgraph Criticism["Scientific Assessment"] Beliefs --> Lit["2024 review: ~90% of degrowth papers are pure opinion"] Lit --> Flaw["Lacks empirical economic modeling"] end ```

Over the past decade, however, the movement has drifted into what Sabine terms "ideological mush." Her first encounter occurred years ago after producing a video arguing that pricing carbon is essential to combat climate change, only to be told that capitalism is inseparable from the patriarchy. Platforms like *Degrowth.info* market the concept as an academic research field dedicated to exposing intersecting "systems of domination such as capitalism, extractivism, colonialism, and patriarchy." Academic titles in this space include papers like *"Towards a Feminist Decolonial Degrowth Approach"* and *"Why degrowth needs Black ecology."*

- *The Degrowth Journal* requires prospective editors to commit to anti-capitalist positions and intersectional theory, abandoning traditional standards of scientific objectivity. - A 2024 literature review reported that roughly 90% of published degrowth papers are opinion pieces rather than empirical studies.

---

[02:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=141s) Deconstructing the Core Arguments Against Growth

While the Guardian editorial strikes a comparatively moderate tone, Sabine points out that its central claims crumble under economic scrutiny. The authors assert that *"Growth has become decoupled from shared prosperity,"* a claim refuted by global history. Over the past 50 years, global poverty has dropped precipitously as a direct consequence of economic expansion. The areas suffering from persistent high poverty rates are almost exclusively those where economic growth has stagnated. While capitalism has expanded access to nutrition, medicine, and education, localized issues—such as persistent wealth inequality in the United States—are driven by domestic policy rather than an inherent failure of growth itself.

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: Mechanics of Decoupling vs Degrowth Fallacy accDescr: Comparing the false assumptions of degrowth with the reality of economic growth via decoupling and efficiency.

subgraph DegrowthClaim["Degrowth Premise"] D1["Finite Physical Resources"] --> D2["Growth Requires Raw Consumption"] D2 --> D3["Inevitable Collapse"] end

subgraph EconomicReality["Economic Reality"] R1["Technology & Efficiency"] --> R2["Value Added Per Resource Unit"] R3["Decoupling Emissions"] --> R2 R2 --> R4["Sustained Growth Without Exploitation"] end ```

The piece also recycles the Club of Rome claim that physical limits prevent endless economic expansion. Sabine highlights two key flaws: first, human civilization has barely scratched the surface of planetary resources; second, economic output does not simply track physical material consumption. Economic growth measures value creation, which routinely increases through efficiency, smarter resource allocation, and technological innovation—or even expansion off-world. Addressing the authors' claim that *"Poverty is manufactured,"* Sabine agrees that while governmental policies shape poverty, it is absurd to place exclusive blame on capitalism while ignoring factors like war, national debt, natural disasters, and misguided ideological movements like degrowth.

---

[04:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=242s) Economists Push Back and the Value of Capitalism

Examining the actual academic literature reveals almost no rigorous research evaluating real-world degrowth pathways. The sparse papers that do model degrowth scenarios rely on speculative assumptions, concluding they might work only *"if you try really hard and no one chops off your head while you try."* By contrast, legitimate environmental economics concentrates on "decoupling"—expanding economic output while reducing carbon emissions and material footprints. Several developed nations have demonstrated absolute decoupling by growing their GDP while steadily reducing annual carbon dioxide emissions.

Professional economists reacted harshly to the Guardian essay on X: - **Vincent Geloso** (Professor of Economics): Noted he has written papers debunking the work of several co-authors, criticizing their scholarship as "sloppy and/or outright incompetent." - **Pedro Santa Clara** (Professor of Finance): Stated plainly that *"Growth is the only anti-poverty program that has ever worked."* - **Andrew Jonelis** (Assistant Professor): Highlighted empirical studies proving that every cross-national measure of human material well-being maintains a direct statistical correlation with GDP per capita.

Sabine stresses that capitalism represents humanity's most vital emergent innovation after spoken language. As a decentralized, self-organizing mechanism for resource allocation, it functions successfully regardless of whether individual actors understand its mechanisms. Deliberately suppressing economic output through degrowth amounts to an *"unusually aggressive beta test"* that threatens human well-being.

---

[06:17](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=377s) Sponsor Segment: Ground News

Navigating mainstream coverage of economic and regulatory policies is frequently complicated by repetitive headlines and hidden editorial slant. Sabine uses **Ground News**, an aggregation platform that consolidates reporting from worldwide outlets to provide concise summaries and media-bias breakdowns.

As an example, coverage of California's newly introduced artificial intelligence regulations reveals that while right-leaning and left-leaning outlets frame the debate with varying nuances, Ground News's cross-comparison shows broad consensus across the spectrum: voluntary safety pledges from tech firms are inadequate, making state-mandated standards necessary. The platform incorporates a factuality scoring system, ownership transparency for every news outlet, and a "Blindspot" feature that identifies stories covered exclusively by one end of the political spectrum. Viewers can secure a 40% discount on the comprehensive Vantage plan by visiting `ground.news/sabine`.

## Notable quotes > [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=0s) We economists have done the maths: growth is a doomed strategy. — The Guardian / Economists

> [02:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=141s) Growth has become decoupled from shared prosperity — The Guardian / Economists

> [02:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=141s) Poverty is manufactured — The Guardian / Economists

> [04:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=242s) if you try really hard and no one chops off your head while you try. — Sabine Hossenfelder

> [04:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=242s) sloppy and/or outright incompetent. — Vincent Geloso

> [04:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=242s) Growth is the only anti-poverty program that has ever worked. — Pedro Santa Clara

> [04:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=242s) unusually aggressive beta test — Sabine Hossenfelder

> [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=0s) Towards a Feminist Decolonial Degrowth Approach

> [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs&t=0s) Why degrowth needs Black ecology

## Mentioned Sabine Hossenfelder, The Guardian, Joseph Stiglitz, Club of Rome, The Limits to Growth, Degrowth.info, The Degrowth Journal, Vincent Geloso, Pedro Santa Clara, Andrew Jonelis, Ground News, X (Twitter)

## Video description Go to https://ground.news/sabine to get 40% off the Vantage plan and see through sensationalized reporting. Stay fully informed on events around the world with Ground News.

The Guardian recently ran a piece by a group of economists, one of them a Nobel laureate, arguing that economic growth is a doomed strategy. I went and looked at what this movement actually publishes, and I fell into a rabbit hole I did not expect. I think these people are dangerous. Let's take a look.

#degrowth #economics #climatechange #sciencenews

👕T-shirts, mugs, posters and more: ➜ https://sabines-store.dashery.com/ 💌 Support me on Donorbox ➜ https://donorbox.org/swtg 👉 Transcript with links to references on Patreon ➜ https://www.patreon.com/Sabine 📝 Transcripts and written news on Substack ➜ https://sciencewtg.substack.com/ 📩 Free weekly science newsletter ➜ https://sabinehossenfelder.com/newsletter/ 👂 Audio only podcast ➜ https://open.spotify.com/show/0MkNfXlKnMPEUMEeKQYmYC 🔗 Join this channel to get access to perks ➜ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1yNl2E66ZzKApQdRuTQ4tw/join 📚 Buy my book ➜ https://amzn.to/3HSAWJW

[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GYDQU5ftBs)

中文简报

经济学家指去增长增加贫困风险，反驳斯蒂格利茨主张去增长理论依赖意识形态观点而非实证模型，忽视了技术脱钩，并通过攻击全球减贫的主要驱动力威胁人类福祉。 Sabine审视了“去增长”运动的学术与哲学基础，指出其已发表文献中约90%属于意识形态观点而非实证经济模型。她反驳了增长已与人类福祉脱钩的说法，指出历史上全球减贫一直依赖经济扩张，且增长体现的是价值创造而非原材料消耗。她援引反对去增长的主流经济学家观点，强调碳排放与GDP增长脱钩是可以实现的，并警告称通过去增长抑制经济活动会威胁现代人类的繁荣。诺贝尔奖得主Joseph Stiglitz合著的一篇《卫报》特约评论文章认为经济增长是注定失败的策略，重新引发了关于“去增长”运动的争论。 (0:00) 2024年的一项文献综述显示，已发表的关于去增长的学术论文中，约90%为观点性文章而非实证经济学研究。 (0:00) 主流经济学家强烈反驳去增长的主张，指出过去50年中全球贫困人口的减少与GDP扩张直接相关。 (2:21) 环境经济学表明，通过提高技术效率，经济增长可以与排放和物质资源消耗实现脱钩。 (4:02)

Reading summary

Sabine Hossenfelder argues that the resurging 'degrowth' movement relies on ideological academia rather than empirical evidence, countering that sustained economic growth remains indispensable for reducing poverty and funding technological sustainability. Ideological Drift and Empirical Shortfalls in Degrowth (0:00) Tracing back to the Club of Rome’s 1970s report 'The Limits to Growth', degrowth posits that planetary resource boundaries make continued economic expansion unsustainable. Hossenfelder observes that over the past decade, the movement has increasingly merged with intersectional theory, framing capitalism as inherently bound to extractivism, colonialism, and patriarchy. Outlets such as 'The Degrowth Journal' openly require editorial commitments to anti-capitalist viewpoints, moving away from conventional scientific neutrality. This academic shift has coincided with a lack of empirical rigor. Hossenfelder cites a 2024 literature review revealing that approximately 90% of published degrowth research consists of opinion pieces rather than empirical studies. The sparse papers that attempt to model degrowth transitions rely on highly speculative assumptions rather than practical, real-world economic mechanisms. Poverty Reduction and Value Versus Material Limits (2:21) Critiquing a Guardian editorial co-authored by Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz which claimed that economic growth has decoupled from shared prosperity, Hossenfelder points to historical evidence showing the opposite. Over the past 50 years, global poverty rates have fallen dramatically as a direct consequence of economic expansion, while persistent poverty remains concentrated in regions experiencing economic stagnation. She attributes specific wealth disparities, such as inequality in the United States, to domestic policy decisions rather than an inherent failure of growth. Hossenfelder also challenges the foundational assumption that physical planetary limits inevitably constrain the economy. Economic growth measures value creation—which increases through efficiency gains, technological innovation, and smarter resource management—rather than direct physical material consumption. Consequently, economic output can continue expanding without requiring a proportional rise in resource extraction. Mainstream Economic Rebuttal and Decoupling (4:02) Mainstream environmental economics focuses on 'decoupling' economic activity from environmental damage, a phenomenon demonstrated by several developed nations that have successfully increased gross domestic product while reducing absolute carbon dioxide emissions. Deliberately contracting economic activity, Hossenfelder warns, amounts to an untested intervention that threatens modern living standards. Professional economists highlighted in the broadcast strongly reject degrowth premises. Vincent Geloso criticized prominent degrowth publications as academically flawed, Pedro Santa Clara stated that economic growth is the only anti-poverty program that has ever functioned effectively, and Andrew Jonelis pointed to empirical literature linking measures of human material well-being directly to GDP per capita. Hossenfelder characterizes capitalism as an emergent, decentralized mechanism for resource allocation, arguing that attempting to suppress it endangers global welfare. Hossenfelder concludes that degrowth's rejection of economic expansion is an unscientific gamble, asserting that addressing ecological problems requires targeted measures like carbon pricing and efficiency improvements rather than dismantling market-driven prosperity.

Source quotes

[0:00] The Guardian / Economists: We economists have done the maths: growth is a doomed strategy. [2:21] The Guardian / Economists: Growth has become decoupled from shared prosperity [2:21] The Guardian / Economists: Poverty is manufactured [4:02] Sabine Hossenfelder: if you try really hard and no one chops off your head while you try. [4:02] Vincent Geloso: sloppy and/or outright incompetent. [4:02] Pedro Santa Clara: Growth is the only anti-poverty program that has ever worked. [4:02] Sabine Hossenfelder: unusually aggressive beta test [0:00] Towards a Feminist Decolonial Degrowth Approach [0:00] Why degrowth needs Black ecology

Original transcript

[0:00] The Guardian recently published an article with one hell of a headline: [0:05] “We economists have done the maths: growth is a doomed strategy.” One of [0:10] the authors is Joseph Stiglitz, who has won a Nobel Prize in economics. This is [0:16] a group of “degrowthers”. I think these people are dangerous. Let me explain. [0:21] Degrowth, in a nutshell, is the idea that economic growth is not sustainable [0:27] and societies must stop aspiring to it to save the environment and with that, [0:32] themselves. The thought is by no means new, it goes back to the early 70s when the Club [0:37] of Rome published its now famous “Limits of Growth” report that said basically: [0:42] Our planet is finite, resources are finite, therefore economies can’t keep on growing forever. [0:48] I’ll tell you in a moment why that’s wrong. More important is that in the past decade, [0:54] the “degrowth” movement has merged with other weird ideologies. [0:59] I stumbled onto this coincidentally some years ago when I made a video explaining why putting [1:05] a price on carbon is the only chance we have to stop climate change. In response I was educated [1:12] that this is bad because capitalism isn’t about capital, oh no, capitalism is the patriarchy. [1:20] I looked at what these people were onto, and I fell into a rabbit hole of ideological mush. [1:25] The website Degrowth.info says that it’s a “field of academic research“ which “exposes [1:32] the interconnection of systems of domination such as capitalism, extractivism, colonialism, [1:38] and patriarchy”. Some examples of titles that have been published in this research [1:42] area are “Towards a Feminist Decolonial Degrowth Approach” and “Why degrowth needs Black ecology.” [1:49] The Degrowth Journal expects prospective editors to commit to anti-capitalism and [1:56] to embrace intersectionality because we don’t want to spoil peer review with objectivity. [2:02] You get the picture: It’s the loony end of woke academia. A review article from 2024 found that [2:08] 90% of papers on the topics are opinions. That number might be somewhat of an exaggeration, but [2:14] there’s no doubt that a lot of what gets published under the name of degrowth is not proper science. [2:21] The recent piece in the Guardian, in comparison, is fairly reasonable. The [2:26] authors argue that “Growth has become decoupled from shared prosperity” which is largely wrong. [2:33] Poverty has declined dramatically globally in the past 50 years thanks to economic growth, [2:39] and the countries where poverty rates are still high are mostly those where growth has been slow. [2:45] Capitalism has led to dramatic progress, better nutrition, better medicine, better education. And [2:51] yet in some countries, like the United States, we see a persistent income inequality that [2:57] keeps a large share of the population in poverty. The authors of the Guardian piece also write that [3:03] growth is “ecologically unsustainable” because you can’t have endless expansion on a finite [3:09] planet. This is the basis of the degrowth idea. But this isn’t true. For one thing, [3:15] we are using a ridiculously tiny part of Earth’s resources at the moment, [3:19] we have literally barely scratched the surface, so even if resources are theoretically finite [3:25] in practice we long haven’t reached the end. But more importantly, economic growth doesn’t measure [3:30] expansion or even the amount of resources used. It can come about by a more efficient or smarter use [3:36] of resources. And of course you can beat the limits the Elon way by going off the planet. [3:42] The authors then conclude that “Poverty is manufactured” which isn’t totally wrong but it’s [3:48] idiotic to exclusively blame capitalism for the remaining poverty. Governmental policy obviously [3:54] affects poverty. But so does war, debt, natural disaster, and ideological drivel like “degrowth.” [4:02] Now you might say, well, what does a physicist know about economics? Fair [4:05] enough. But at least I know how to look at scientific journals and I can tell you [4:10] that there is basically no serious research on degrowth. There are at most a handful of [4:15] semi-serious papers that investigate degrowth scenarios and vaguely conclude that they’re [4:21] kind of possible if you try really hard and no one chops off your head while you try. [4:26] The most closely related reasonable economics literature is instead about “decoupling”, [4:32] that is the idea that you can continue growth without exploiting the environment. And there are [4:39] some hopeful examples for this, such as multiple countries that have decreased carbon dioxide [4:44] output despite maintaining economic growth. But decoupling is about maintaining growth. [4:51] If that still doesn’t convince you, here are some reactions of economists on X to the Guardian [4:57] piece. Here we have Vincent Geloso, a professor for economics who writes “I have written papers [5:03] debunking the works of half these authors… All three for being sloppy and/or outright [5:09] incompetent.” There is Pedro Santa Clara professor of finance, who points out the problems with the [5:14] article and concludes “Growth is the only anti-poverty program that has ever worked.” [5:20] And then there’s assistant professor Andrew Jonelis who points to a paper whose authors [5:26] have “done the maths” showing that, quote “any cross-national measure of human [5:31] material wellbeing … will have a statistical relationship with country GDP per capita”. [5:37] So why am I telling you about this? Because I feel like I’ve been too quiet about all the craziness [5:43] that I’ve seen in academia in the past 10 years. And this particular ideology is outright harmful. [5:50] Capitalism is the most important emergent feature that the human species has produced, [5:56] yet, right after languages. It’s a decentralized self-organized system to [6:01] distribute resources that works whether or not people understand how it works, [6:06] which is its beauty. Maybe it’s not the best system, but so far we haven’t found a [6:10] better one. And “make everyone poorer on purpose” strikes me as an unusually aggressive beta test. [6:17] I read a lot of news every day and that used to be really tedious because a lot of headlines [6:23] repeat and it's difficult to tell what quality the articles are. But today's sponsor, Ground News, [6:29] has really made my news reading so much better. Ground News is a news platform that collects [6:35] news from all over the world. It really saves me a lot of time because I don't have to sort [6:40] through a dozen headlines on the same story. I can just get a quick summary and fact check [6:46] for all the coverage. And ground news also gives you a lot of extra information at one glance. An [6:53] interesting recent example is the press coverage of California's new AI laws. Ground news gives [7:00] you a comparison of what the political left and political right focuses on. In this case, [7:06] interestingly, while there are nuances in the focus, pretty much everyone agrees that voluntary [7:12] commitments are insufficient and mandatory standards are needed. This summary is super [7:18] useful and really saves me a lot of time. Ground News also gives you a factuality check for each [7:24] news item, tells you who owns the media outlets and where the news has appeared. Ground News also [7:30] has this interesting feature called blind spot. This collects news which has been covered only on [7:36] one side of the political spectrum. I found ground news super useful for putting news into context [7:43] quickly. And of course, I have a special offer for you. That's a 40% discount on the Vantage plan [7:51] which gives you access to all their features. All you need to do is use my link ground.news/sabine [7:57] or use the QR code so they'll know I sent you. Thanks for watching. See you tomorrow.