Adam Khoo
A 5% 10-year Treasury yield remains below the 76-year historical average of 5.52%, meaning equities will avoid a crash and continue compounding as long as corporate earnings growth outpaces inflation.
AI-assisted summary of Will Rising Long Term Rates Crash Stocks? — original source. Check the original for full context.
Source published:
Key ideas
- The U.S. 10-year Treasury yield's climb near 5% reflects a standard macro baseline of ~1.5% real GDP growth and ~3.4% CPI inflation, set by open-market debt dynamics rather than direct Federal Reserve decree. (0:00)
- A 5% bond yield sits right within historical norms, below the 76-year mean of 5.52% and near the median of 4.72%, with past regimes like the 1980s delivering 17.0% annualized equity returns despite double-digit yields. (5:14)
- Rising yields disproportionately pressure unprofitable growth firms, leveraged cyclicals, and REITs due to higher DCF discount rates and refinancing costs, while established cash-rich compounders remain insulated. (14:58)
- Financial institutions and balance-sheet-heavy mega-caps serve as natural rate beneficiaries, generating higher net interest margins and offsetting debt expenses with interest earned on cash reserves. (19:32)
Detailed notes
## Background Published by professional investor and author Adam Khoo on YouTube on September 14, 2026, this video examines whether surging U.S. 10-year Treasury yields approaching 5.0% threaten to trigger a major stock market crash. The presentation explores the mechanics behind rising bond yields, assesses historical rate environments, and outlines which market sectors are most vulnerable versus those positioned to thrive under higher borrowing costs.
## TL;DR Adam Khoo demonstrates that 10-year Treasury yields hovering near 5% remain squarely within historical norms rather than signaling an impending market collapse, noting that strong corporate earnings growth historically allows equities to thrive alongside elevated rates. Rising yields transmit pressure through higher corporate debt refinancing costs and steeper DCF discount rates, which severely compress valuations for unprofitable tech companies, REITs, and leveraged cyclicals. Conversely, cash-rich mega-cap tech, commercial banks, insurers, and exchange operators like ICE are insulated or actively benefit from higher rates. Khoo argues that investors should abandon futile interest rate forecasting and instead construct a resilient, all-weather portfolio anchored in the top 1% of cash-generative compounders.
## Atmosphere & style The presentation is pragmatic, calm, and educational, cutting through prevailing financial news anxiety with long-term historical data and balance sheet logic. Khoo adopts an authoritative yet conversational coaching style, using clear frameworks and occasional dry humor to dismiss macro panic. Watching it feels like a stabilizing masterclass that shifts the viewer's focus away from reactive headline-chasing and toward disciplined fundamental stock picking.
## Bulletin - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=0s) The U.S. 10-year Treasury yield's climb near 5% reflects a standard macro baseline of ~1.5% real GDP growth and ~3.4% CPI inflation, set by open-market debt dynamics rather than direct Federal Reserve decree. - [05:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=314s) A 5% bond yield sits right within historical norms, below the 76-year mean of 5.52% and near the median of 4.72%, with past regimes like the 1980s delivering 17.0% annualized equity returns despite double-digit yields. - [14:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=898s) Rising yields disproportionately pressure unprofitable growth firms, leveraged cyclicals, and REITs due to higher DCF discount rates and refinancing costs, while established cash-rich compounders remain insulated. - [19:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=1172s) Financial institutions and balance-sheet-heavy mega-caps serve as natural rate beneficiaries, generating higher net interest margins and offsetting debt expenses with interest earned on cash reserves.
## Key takeaways - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=0s) The 10-year Treasury yield is driven by open-market supply and demand rather than the Federal Reserve, roughly matching the sum of real GDP growth (~1.5%) and headline CPI inflation (~3.4%). - [02:20](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=140s) Higher bond yields affect equities through two primary channels: elevating corporate borrowing costs and raising the discount rate used to value future cash flows. - [02:20](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=140s) Valuations of unprofitable speculative growth companies are crushed under higher yields because their cash flows are projected far into the future, whereas near-term cash generators suffer minimal discounting impact. - [05:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=314s) Taking a 76-year perspective from 1950 reveals that current yields around 4.9% are completely normal, sitting slightly below the historical average of 5.52% and near the 4.72% median. - [08:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=510s) Stock market performance is not hindered by elevated rates alone; the S&P 500 delivered a 17.0% annualized CAGR during the 1980s when 10-year yields averaged 10.6%. - [12:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=725s) During the 2000s 'lost decade' where broad indexes ended flat, high-quality businesses with consistent cash flows, high ROIC, and pricing power delivered outsized multi-bagger returns. - [13:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=826s) The danger of rising yields depends on earnings growth: yields surging alongside flat or falling corporate earnings trigger bear markets, but yields rising with expanding profits allow equities to advance. - [14:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=898s) Unprofitable tech companies, REITs facing dividend cuts from higher interest expenses, and heavily leveraged cyclicals like airlines and telcos represent the most vulnerable sectors. - [19:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=1172s) Commercial banks expand net interest margins and insurance firms invest floats at higher yields, making financials an effective direct hedge against rising rates. - [19:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=1172s) Cash-rich mega-caps like Meta and Alphabet effectively neutralize debt service obligations with substantial interest income earned on their cash piles. - [23:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=1388s) Exchange operators like Intercontinental Exchange benefit structurally from higher rates by collecting increased margin interest and profiting from volatile energy derivative volumes. - [23:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=1407s) Macroeconomic rate forecasting is consistently inaccurate, underscoring the necessity of building an all-weather portfolio anchored in durable compounders rather than guessing policy paths.
## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=0s) Rising 10-Year Treasury Yields and the Inflation Equation
With the U.S. 10-year Treasury yield climbing rapidly and closing in on 5%, investors are growing increasingly anxious about whether a major stock market crash is imminent. Recent months have seen long-term government bond yields march upward, driven higher by persistent inflation, geopolitical conflict, and oil price pressures. Investors naturally want to know which stocks are sitting in the crosshairs, which are insulated from the damage, and how to position a portfolio to survive or even thrive in this environment.
To understand the threat, investors must first recognize how the 10-year Treasury yield is actually determined. Often referred to simply as the "long rate," long-term interest rates are not set by the Federal Reserve. While the Fed dictates the short-term benchmark—the federal funds rate, which central bankers adjust at policy meetings—long-term rates are set by open-market supply and demand for U.S. government debt.
At a high level, the 10-year yield reflects a straightforward macro baseline: real GDP growth plus inflation. For example, with second-quarter real GDP coming in at approximately 1.5% and headline CPI inflation registering at 3.4%, combining the two produces 4.9%—almost precisely where the 10-year Treasury yield sits.
```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: Macro Determinants of Long-Term Bond Yields accDescr: Real GDP Growth and CPI Inflation combine to drive the market-determined 10-Year Treasury yield. subgraph Macro["Macroeconomic Drivers"] GDP["Real GDP Growth (~1.5%)"] CPI["Headline CPI Inflation (~3.4%)"] end Yield["U.S. 10-Year Treasury Yield (~4.9%)"] GDP --> Yield CPI --> Yield ```
- **Short-Term vs. Long-Term Rates**: The Federal Reserve controls the short-term federal funds rate; the open market sets the 10-year Treasury yield through bond supply and demand. - **The Yield Formula**: Long-term yield roughly equates to Real GDP Growth plus Inflation. - **Current Macro Snapshot**: 1.5% real GDP growth plus 3.4% CPI inflation lands bond yields right around 4.9%.
---
[02:20](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=140s) How Rising Long-Term Yields Impact Stocks: Debt and Discount Rates
Surging long-term interest rates hit individual equities through two distinct mechanisms. The first direct channel is corporate borrowing costs. When an investor buys a share of stock, they own a piece of a business. Companies burdened with heavy debt loads face mounting interest expenses when they issue or refinance bonds at higher prevailing rates. As interest expenses climb, profit margins compress, bottom-line earnings shrink, and the underlying intrinsic value of the business drops. By contrast, companies operating with clean balance sheets and minimal debt can brush off higher rates completely: "Interest rates go up, I don't care. I don't have much debt."
The second mechanism operates through discounted cash flow (DCF) modeling. A business's intrinsic value equals the present value of all its future cash flows discounted back to today, and the discount rate applied in valuation models is anchored to the 10-year Treasury yield. When yields spike, the required discount rate rises. This disproportionately punishes unprofitable, speculative growth companies whose projected cash flows sit 5 to 10 years out in the future. Heavily discounting cash that will not arrive for a decade dramatically slashes a company's present intrinsic value. However, established businesses that already throw off massive cash flows right now suffer far less, because the bulk of their value is realized in the near term.
```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Transmission Mechanisms of Rising Yields accDescr: Rising bond yields transmit into lower intrinsic valuations via higher borrowing costs and higher discount rates. Yield["Rising 10-Year Treasury Yield"]
subgraph Channel1["Borrowing Cost Channel"] Debt["Higher Corporate Borrowing Costs"] Expense["Increased Interest Expenses"] Profits["Compressed Net Margins"] end
subgraph Channel2["Valuation Channel"] Discount["Higher Valuation Discount Rate"] FutureCash["Deeply Discounts Future Cash Flows"] end
ValuationDrop["Sharply Lower Intrinsic Value for Unprofitable/Indebted Stocks"]
Yield --> Debt Debt --> Expense Expense --> Profits Profits --> ValuationDrop
Yield --> Discount Discount --> FutureCash FutureCash --> ValuationDrop ```
- **Vulnerable Profiles**: Highly leveraged companies face surging interest expenses; unprofitable companies face severe valuation compression because their expected earnings sit far in the future. - **Immune Profiles**: Cash-rich businesses with low or zero debt, paired with high existing profitability, remain largely unaffected by long-rate fluctuations.
---
[05:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=314s) Historical Perspective: Is a 5% Yield Dangerously High?
While rates hovering between 4.9% and 5.5% feel shockingly steep to investors who grew accustomed to the record lows of the pandemic era—when yields dropped to a historic low of 0.7%—a longer historical lens provides crucial context. Taking a 76-year perspective on the S&P 500 and Treasury yields dating back to 1950 reveals that current yields are not an anomaly; they sit right in line with historical norms.
Across those 76 years, the 10-year Treasury yield peaked in 1981 at a staggering 15.6% during the Paul Volcker inflation battle, and bottomed out in 2020 at 0.7%. Over that entire seven-decade span, the historical mean yield stands at 5.52%, with a median of 4.72%. Sitting around 4.9%, today's yield is actually resting slightly below the long-term historical average. A 5% yield is by no means an automatic red flag for an equity collapse; panic is unwarranted unless rates blow past historical boundaries toward 7%, 8%, or 9%.
- **Historical Peak (1981)**: 10-year Treasury yield hit 15.6%. - **Historical Trough (2020)**: Yield collapsed to 0.7% during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. - **76-Year Average**: The historical mean is 5.52%, and the median is 4.72%. - **Current Position**: Yields around 4.9% sit essentially right at the historical center line.
---
[08:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=510s) Decade-by-Decade Market Returns vs. Bond Yields
Examining the historical record decade by decade shows that high bond yields do not prevent equities from delivering spectacular gains. In the 1950s, amidst a post-war economic boom and low inflation, yields averaged 3.2% while the S&P 500 delivered a blistering 19.0% compound annualized growth rate (CAGR). The 1960s saw average yields creep up to 4.7% during an era of rising inflation, yet the market still generated a 7.8% annualized return. Even the turbulent 1970s—plagued by severe oil shocks and an average yield around 7.5%—managed a positive annualized return of 5.9%, outrunning inflation across the decade.
The 1980s provide the clearest proof that equity bull markets can coexist with high interest rates. During that decade, average 10-year Treasury yields stood at 10.6%—more than double current levels. Yet, the S&P 500 compounded at an extraordinary 17.0% annually, ranking among the best performing decades in stock market history. By comparison, during the first six years of the 2020s, yields have averaged 3.1% while the market has compounded at 15.5%.
| Decade | Average 10-Year Yield | S&P 500 Total Return (Annualized CAGR) | Economic Backdrop | |:--- |:--- |:--- |:--- | | **1950s** | 3.2% | 19.0% | Post-war economic boom; low inflation | | **1960s** | 4.7% | 7.8% | Rising inflationary pressures | | **1970s** | 7.5% | 5.9% | Oil shocks; high inflation | | **1980s** | 10.6% | 17.0% | Volcker disinflation; explosive bull market | | **2000s** | 4.5% | Negative | "Lost Decade": Dot-com bust and 2008 GFC | | **2020s (to date)** | 3.1% | 15.5% | Recovery, tech leadership, rising inflation |
The sole negative decade was the 2000s, where average yields were a moderate 4.5%, but the market was slammed by two catastrophic events: the dot-com collapse and the 2008 Global Financial Crisis. Even during that notorious "lost decade" where broad indexes finished underwater, high-quality businesses with durable balance sheets, rising revenues, and strong free cash flow managed to generate substantial positive returns for disciplined investors.
[12:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=725s) Outperforming in a "Lost Decade" with Top 1% Quality Businesses
Reflecting on past market cycles, Adam highlights that during the infamous "lost decade" (the 2000s), an investor holding the broad S&P 500 endured a brutal crash, a recovery, another crisis, and ultimately ended the 10-year period virtually flat—having gone nowhere. However, picking individual companies in the top 1% that maintained consistent growth in revenue, net profits, and cash flow alongside wide economic moats produced staggering returns. During that exact same decade when the index stood still, a basket of disciplined compounders exploded in value. Adam stresses that this does not mean one should blindly buy these exact legacy names today, as business dynamics evolve.
Instead, the lesson is to identify the modern equivalents belonging to that top 1% today: businesses boasting consistent cash flow growth, minimal debt, high return on equity (ROE), superior return on invested capital (ROIC), and impregnable competitive advantages. Anchoring a portfolio in these high-quality, highly profitable companies removes the fear of a broader market stagnation or another lost decade, because fundamental business performance will ultimately drive stock returns regardless of index headwinds.
- **Monster Beverage:** Gained 18,000% across the decade. - **Tesco:** Gained 3,900%. - **AutoZone:** Gained 1,400%. - **The TJX Companies (TJX):** Gained 1,100%. - **UnitedHealth Group:** Gained 690%. - **Starbucks:** Gained 587%.
[13:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=826s) The Real Impact of the 10-Year Treasury Yield: Pace and Earnings Growth
Historical data reveals a counterintuitive truth: high 10-year Treasury yields do not inherently mean equities deliver negative returns. In fact, some periods marked by relatively high 10-year yields produced some of the market's strongest 10-year annualized returns. The threat to equity markets is dictated by two distinct factors: the velocity of the yield's ascent, and the fundamental macroeconomic driver behind that rise.
If yields surge purely due to runaway inflation while corporate earnings stall or contract, equities face a severe valuation crunch, paving the way for sharp corrections or bear markets. Conversely, if bond yields drift higher while underlying corporate earnings expand briskly—as evidenced in recent earnings seasons—the broader stock market can climb in tandem with the 10-year Treasury yield. The ultimate trajectory depends on earnings durability rather than the absolute level of interest rates alone.
```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Rising Treasury Yield Drivers and Equity Impact accDescr: A flow chart showing how high yields driven by inflation versus corporate earnings determine whether stock markets crash or rise.
Yield["Rising 10-Year Treasury Yield"]
subgraph BearishCase["Scenario A: Inflation Driven"] Inf["High Inflation"] --> FlatEarnings["Flat or Declining Corporate Earnings"] FlatEarnings --> Crash["Stock Market Correction / Bear Market"] end
subgraph BullishCase["Scenario B: Growth Driven"] Growth["Economic Expansion"] --> StrongEarnings["Robust Corporate Earnings Growth"] StrongEarnings --> Bull["Stock Market Rises Alongside Yields"] end
Yield --> BearishCase Yield --> BullishCase ```
[14:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=898s) The Most Vulnerable Assets: Unprofitable Growth, REITs, and Cyclicals
If the long-term 10-year rate advances toward 5% or 6%, portfolio asset allocation becomes critical. Investors heavily concentrated in rate-sensitive names must rebalance, whereas those sheltered by rate-resilient holdings have far less cause for concern. The first category most vulnerable to higher rates comprises unprofitable growth and emerging tech companies. Because these firms generate virtually all expected cash flows far into the future, hiking the discount rate in a discounted cash flow valuation crushes their intrinsic value. Checking financial platforms like Stock Oracle reveals companies like Snowflake, Cloudflare (NET), and quantum computing play IonQ continue to operate at steep net losses, leaving them acutely exposed.
The second highly vulnerable group is Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and utility companies. Both sectors rely extensively on debt financing to fund heavy infrastructure and real estate acquisitions. As rates remain elevated, interest expenses spike, eroding distributable net income and forcing dividend cuts—the primary reason REIT valuations have sagged. Adam notes that while his Singapore REIT holdings have pulled back, his broader dividend portfolio remains net positive because it is hedged with massive stakes in Singapore banks, which profit from the exact same rate dynamics.
The third vulnerable group is highly leveraged cyclicals, such as airlines, telecommunications providers, cable networks, and property developers. These businesses naturally carry bloated balance sheets; when servicing costs increase, operating margins shrink quickly, dragging down stock prices.
```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: Rising Rates Impact on Vulnerable Sectors accDescr: Three groups of stocks that suffer when long-term interest rates increase.
subgraph HighRates["Higher Discount Rates & Borrowing Costs"] direction TB Rates["Rising Long-Term Yields"] end
subgraph Vulnerable["Most Impacted Sectors"] direction TB Tech["Unprofitable Tech / Growth\n(Snowflake, Cloudflare, IonQ)\nDCF discount rates crater present value"] REITs["REITs & Utilities\nDebt-heavy balance sheets;\nInterest expense cuts dividends"] Cyclicals["Leveraged Cyclicals\n(Airlines, Telcos, Developers)\nHigh debt servicing erodes income"] end
Rates --> Tech Rates --> REITs Rates --> Cyclicals ```
[19:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=1172s) Rate Winners and Insulated Compounders: Financials, Mega-Caps, and Short-Duration Value
Conversely, several market segments benefit directly from elevated yields or maintain fortress balance sheets that neutralize the damage:
1. **Banks and Insurance Companies:** Commercial banks expand their net interest margins (NIM) as benchmark lending yields widen. Adam's major positions in Singapore banks—DBS, UOB, and OCBC—form over half of his dividend portfolio and thrive in this climate. Similarly, property/casualty and life insurers like Arch Capital Group (ACGL) and Germany's Allianz deploy their enormous insurance floats into higher-yielding fixed-income instruments, generating substantial risk-free investment returns. 2. **Cash-Rich Mega-Cap Tech:** While bears argue that tech giants like Meta, Google (Alphabet), Apple, and Microsoft take on debt to finance artificial intelligence data centers, their gargantuan cash and short-term equivalent piles earn substantial interest income. In Meta and Alphabet's case, interest earned on cash reserves effectively cancels out debt servicing obligations, leaving their net bottom lines essentially unbothered: "net net what happens if interest rates go up they're like me whatever." 3. **Energy and Commodities:** Although high inflation environments drive up commodity and energy profits, Adam purposefully bypasses oil, natural gas, and copper producers due to their long-term index underperformance and unpredictable price swings. 4. **Short-Duration Value Stocks:** Mature, consistently profitable stalwarts with strong current pricing power—such as Linde plc, Mastercard, Visa, Motorola Solutions, and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE)—carry little valuation sensitivity to rising discount rates and frequently leverage transaction volumes to harvest higher margins.
[23:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=1388s) Rate Beneficiaries: Intercontinental Exchange
Continuing the examination of businesses uniquely positioned to thrive in an environment of escalating yields, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) stands out due to two primary structural advantages. First, the exchange operator profits directly from financing: as benchmark rates climb, the company generates substantially higher margin interest on the leverage extended to its trading customers.
Second, Intercontinental Exchange commands a massive footprint in energy derivatives. Whenever energy markets experience price volatility or structural upward pressure, trading volumes in energy futures surge, generating a substantial tailwind of exchange fees. These operational levers allow exchange operators like ICE to convert macroeconomic friction into steady revenue, insulating them from the valuation compressions that often plague broader equity markets when bond yields push higher.
- **Margin Interest Expansion**: ICE collects higher interest spreads on customer margin balances as underlying rates escalate. - **Energy Derivatives Surge**: Rising energy costs trigger heightened hedging and speculative volume across ICE's energy futures marketplace.
---
[23:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=1407s) The Folly of Rate Forecasting and the Bulletproof Portfolio
Reflecting on broader market psychology, the secret to achieving consistent, long-term profitability as an investor does not lie in attempting to outguess market moves or anticipate macroeconomic pivots. No one can forecast market directions or interest rate trajectories with reliable accuracy. Looking back at the consensus narrative late last year and entering the current year, virtually the entire financial media and Wall Street analyst community anticipated that policymakers would cut interest rates three to four times. Instead, zero cuts materialized, and market participants have suddenly reversed course to fret over further rate hikes.
```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Forecasting Pitfalls vs. Resilient Portfolio Strategy accDescr: Contrasts the failure of consensus rate forecasting with the strategy of constructing an all-weather portfolio.
subgraph Trap["The Forecasting Trap"] A["Consensus Forecast:<br/>3 to 4 Rate Cuts"] --> B["Reality:<br/>Zero Cuts & Rising Rates"] B --> C["Portfolio Shock & Panic"] end
subgraph Approach["The Resilient Approach"] D["Acknowledge Unpredictability"] --> E["Diversify Across Rate Winners & Resilient Assets"] E --> F["Bulletproof Portfolio:<br/>All-Weather Performance"] end ```
Even the Federal Reserve itself cannot accurately project where the long-term yield curve will settle. Given this reality, the prudent approach is to "stop trying to predict the market" and "stop trying to predict interest rates." Rather than staking capital on speculative macro forecasts, investors must focus on building a resilient, "bulletproof portfolio that will do well under all market conditions." There is no reason to panic over higher long-term yields at this stage, as borrowing costs are simply fluctuating within a historically "normalized zone."
To navigate these shifts effectively, Adam Khoo reminds viewers to maintain discipline across market cycles: - **Subscribe and Stay Informed**: Turn on bell notifications on YouTube to track timely market updates. - **Structured Education**: Explore online investing and options trading curriculums at Piranha Profits (`piranhaprofits.com`) to generate durable global income. - **Live Interactive Training**: Join the live Wealth Academy mentorship program (`wealthacademyglobal.com`) to master live trading and valuation strategies. - **Closing Blessing**: "May the markets be with you!"
## Notable quotes > [02:20](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=140s) Interest rates go up, I don't care. I don't have much debt. — Adam Khoo
> [19:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=1172s) net net what happens if interest rates go up they're like me whatever. — Adam Khoo
> [23:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=1407s) stop trying to predict the market — Adam Khoo
> [23:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=1407s) stop trying to predict interest rates. — Adam Khoo
> [23:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=1407s) bulletproof portfolio that will do well under all market conditions. — Adam Khoo
> [23:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI&t=1407s) May the markets be with you! — Adam Khoo
## Mentioned Adam Khoo, U.S. 10-year Treasury, Federal Reserve, S&P 500, Paul Volcker, Monster Beverage, Tesco, AutoZone, The TJX Companies, UnitedHealth Group, Starbucks, Snowflake, Cloudflare, IonQ, Stock Oracle, DBS, UOB, OCBC, Arch Capital Group, Allianz, Meta, Alphabet, Apple, Microsoft, Linde plc, Mastercard, Visa, Motorola Solutions, Intercontinental Exchange, Piranha Profits, Wealth Academy
## Video description The U.S. 10-year Treasury yield has surged from around 4.0% to nearly 5.0% over the past 12 months and investors are getting nervous.
Could higher long-term interest rates finally put the brakes on the economy and trigger a major stock market correction? More importantly, are interest rates at a danger level yet?
In this video, I break down what rising bond yields really mean for the economy and stock market, which stocks and sectors are most vulnerable to higher rates, and which businesses are best positioned to withstand or even benefit from the new interest rate environment.
======================== Stock Investing & Trading insights by Adam Khoo will show you profitable trading and investment opportunities in today's stock markets.
These are essential strategies for stock traders and investors who want to improve their investment and trading performance.
Adam Khoo is a professional stock investor and options trader and the best-selling author of 16 books including 'Winning the Game of Stocks" and "Profit from the Panic". Thousands of students have profited from his sharp investment insights into the world of stock market investing and trading. ===================== Sign up for our courses/mentorship programs 📗 Value Momentum Investing: http://bit.ly/4mqrEVP 📙 Options Waverider™: http://bit.ly/4c5xyrR 📘 Price Action Manipulation™ (Trading): http://bit.ly/48FUAmQ 📕 Income Investing™ (Dividends): http://bit.ly/3Ow8CRj
Grab our Playbook Subscriptions Ultimate Investors Playbook™: http://bit.ly/3QiN6zT Options Tactics Playbook™: http://bit.ly/4tCQFPL PAM™ Trader Playbook: http://bit.ly/4mmYnv0 ===================== 💻 Join Our Wealth Academy Live Seminars https://www.wealthacademyglobal.com ===================== 🧑🏫 Visit Adam Khoo Learning Technologies Group https://www.akltg.com ===================== Follow Me On Social Media 🌟 Facebook: https://facebook.com/adamkhoosuccess 🌟 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/adamkhoosuccess/ ===================== Follow Piranha Profits On Social Media 🐟 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/piranhaprofits 🐟 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/piranhaprofits 🐟 Telegram: https://t.me/piranhaprofits 🐟 Discord: https://discord.gg/piranhaprofits ===================== 👉 If you've found this video helpful, please LIKE, SHARE, & COMMENT 👉 SUBSCRIBE to my Channel for more Market Analyses & Investing Strategies 👉 Click on the NOTIFICATION BELL to get notified whenever I upload a new video ===================== 💸 MAY THE MARKETS BE WITH YOU! 💸
[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9P3BKPndnI)