Physics Nobel 2026: You Will Hate Me for Saying This

Sabine Hossenfelder

AI-assisted summary of Physics Nobel 2026: You Will Hate Me for Saying This — original source. Check the original for full context.

Source published: 2026-10-06

Key ideas

Francis Halzen was awarded the 2026 Nobel Prize in Physics as a solo laureate—the first individual physics winner in 32 years—for detecting high-energy cosmic neutrinos. (0:00)
The IceCube Neutrino Observatory transformed one cubic kilometer of Antarctic ice into the world's largest particle detector via 5,000 optical sensors buried 2.5 kilometers deep, at a cost of roughly $300 million. (1:47)
Although IceCube detected cosmic neutrinos reaching up to 20 PeV, the award prompts criticism over whether confirming particles that everyone already expected fulfills Alfred Nobel's mandate to benefit humankind. (3:19)
The decision highlights arbitrary committee selections, bypassing other landmark observational efforts such as the James Webb Space Telescope and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. (3:19)

Detailed notes

## Background Published on YouTube by Sabine Hossenfelder on October 6, 2026, this video covers the announcement of the 2026 Nobel Prize in Physics. According to the video description, it provides a quick overview of who won the prize, what research it recognized, and what can be learned from the achievement.

## TL;DR The 2026 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded solely to Francis Halzen for detecting high-energy cosmic neutrinos using the IceCube Neutrino Observatory, marking the first solo physics laureate in 32 years. IceCube successfully monitors a cubic kilometer of Antarctic ice to detect neutrinos reaching extreme energies of up to 20 PeV, realizing a concept that had previously failed in deep-ocean experiments. However, Sabine Hossenfelder questions whether the discovery truly aligns with Alfred Nobel's mandate to benefit humankind, noting that confirming the existence of particles no one doubted offers little practical utility. She also highlights how the selection feels somewhat arbitrary compared to other major astrophysical milestones, such as findings from the James Webb Space Telescope or the discovery of fast radio bursts.

## Atmosphere & style The presentation carries Hossenfelder's signature dry, deadpan, and contrarian tone, balancing genuine respect for Halzen's textbook legacy with sharp skepticism toward academic self-congratulation. It feels provocative and grounded, cutting through institutional prestige with sardonic commentary on the growing detachment of fundamental physics from practical human benefit. The delivery is brisk, rational, and candid, punctuated by biting humor about humanity now being able to sleep soundly knowing high-energy particles are passing through their beds.

## Bulletin - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yILp9vsw1eI&t=0s) Francis Halzen was awarded the 2026 Nobel Prize in Physics as a solo laureate—the first individual physics winner in 32 years—for detecting high-energy cosmic neutrinos. - [01:47](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yILp9vsw1eI&t=107s) The IceCube Neutrino Observatory transformed one cubic kilometer of Antarctic ice into the world's largest particle detector via 5,000 optical sensors buried 2.5 kilometers deep, at a cost of roughly $300 million. - [03:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yILp9vsw1eI&t=199s) Although IceCube detected cosmic neutrinos reaching up to 20 PeV, the award prompts criticism over whether confirming particles that everyone already expected fulfills Alfred Nobel's mandate to benefit humankind. - [03:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yILp9vsw1eI&t=199s) The decision highlights arbitrary committee selections, bypassing other landmark observational efforts such as the James Webb Space Telescope and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey.

## Key takeaways - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yILp9vsw1eI&t=0s) Francis Halzen received the 2026 Nobel Prize in Physics alone for detecting high-energy cosmic neutrinos, marking the first solo physics prize in 32 years. - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yILp9vsw1eI&t=0s) Halzen is widely known within the physics community as the co-author of the standard textbook Quarks and Leptons. - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yILp9vsw1eI&t=0s) Neutrinos are electrically neutral, near-massless particles that interact so weakly with matter that they can travel billions of light-years across the universe largely undisturbed. - [01:47](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yILp9vsw1eI&t=107s) Early efforts to build massive neutrino detectors in the ocean failed when John Learned's Hawaii project suffered a fatal saltwater leak and short circuit in 1993. - [01:47](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yILp9vsw1eI&t=107s) Halzen adapted the ocean detector concept to the Antarctic ice cap, using hot-water drills to lower sensor strings 2.5 kilometers deep into the ice. - [01:47](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yILp9vsw1eI&t=107s) The completed IceCube observatory monitors one cubic kilometer of ice with over 5,000 optical modules on more than 80 cable strings, built for about $300 million. - [03:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yILp9vsw1eI&t=199s) IceCube recorded neutrinos with energies up to 20 PeV, which translates in the center-of-mass frame to collision energies roughly comparable to the Large Hadron Collider. - [03:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yILp9vsw1eI&t=199s) While some high-energy neutrinos have been traced to active galactic nuclei, the origin of the vast majority remains unidentified. - [03:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yILp9vsw1eI&t=199s) The prize raises fundamental questions about Alfred Nobel's charter, as confirming the existence of expected cosmic neutrinos confers no apparent practical benefit to humankind. - [03:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yILp9vsw1eI&t=199s) Recognizing IceCube overlooks other significant observational milestones, including the James Webb Space Telescope, baryon acoustic oscillations measured by SDSS, and fast radio bursts. - [03:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yILp9vsw1eI&t=199s) Inflation theorists Alan Guth and Andrei Linde continue to be passed over, possibly due to committee reluctance to implicitly endorse the controversial multiverse hypothesis.

## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yILp9vsw1eI&t=0s) A Surprise Solo Nobel Prize for Cosmic Neutrinos

The 2026 Nobel Prize in Physics took the scientific community by surprise, being awarded solely to Francis Halzen for his work measuring high-energy cosmic neutrinos originating billions of light-years away. Halzen’s solo win marks the first time in 32 years that an individual has won the Nobel Prize in Physics alone. For many students and practitioners, Halzen is already an iconic household name as the co-author, alongside Alan Martin, of *Quarks and Leptons*—a foundational textbook considered virtually mandatory reading for anyone entering particle physics. His prize sits directly at the confluence of particle physics, cosmology, and astrophysics.

Neutrinos are fundamental, electrically neutral particles that come in three distinct flavors: the electron-neutrino, the muon-neutrino, and the tau-neutrino. Physicists routinely describe them as "ghostly" because they pass straight through atomic matter almost completely undisturbed, making interactions exceptionally rare. They possess minuscule masses and travel at speeds marginally below the speed of light. While neutrinos are generated abundantly in terrestrial and local nuclear processes—such as nuclear power reactors, nuclear bomb detonations, and core reactions within the Sun—they are also expected to travel from the farthest reaches of the cosmos, providing a unique cosmic messenger to explore the universe's structure, origins, and physical laws.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Neutrino Sources and IceCube Detection accDescr: Diagram tracing neutrino origins from local and cosmic sources down to detection within the IceCube array at the South Pole.

subgraph Sources["Neutrino Production"] Local["Local Sources (Sun, Nuclear Reactors, Weapons)"] Cosmic["Distant Astrophysical Sources (Active Galactic Nuclei, Unknown Cosmic Accelerators)"] end

subgraph Transit["Cosmic Propagation"] Travel["Billions of Light-Years (Electrically neutral, near-light speed, minimal matter interaction)"] end

subgraph IceCube["IceCube Observatory (South Pole)"] Sensors["80+ Strings / 5,000+ Optical Modules (Embedded 2.5 km Deep in Antarctic Ice)"] Signal["Rare Ice Interactions (Up to 20 PeV Cherenkov Light Signals)"] end

Cosmic --> Travel Travel --> Sensors Sensors --> Signal ```

[01:47](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yILp9vsw1eI&t=107s) From Deep Ocean Failures to the IceCube Observatory

Detecting cosmic neutrinos from distant galaxies requires an immense physical volume because these particles rarely leave any trace. The concept of using massive natural water bodies as detectors dates back to the 1970s, when John Learned in Hawaii proposed suspending long vertical detector strings deep into the ocean and anchoring them to the seabed. That underwater endeavor required decades of groundwork, only to meet catastrophe in 1993 when its first detector string suffered a seawater leak, short-circuited within hours, and promptly led the United States government to terminate its funding.

Francis Halzen adapted this concept by swapping liquid ocean water for clear Antarctic ice, leading to the creation of the IceCube Neutrino Observatory at the South Pole. Crews used high-pressure hot water drills to melt boreholes 2.5 kilometers deep into the polar ice sheet. Into each hole, they lowered strings holding roughly 60 optical sensors before allowing the surrounding water to refreeze. As principal investigator since the project's inception, Halzen oversaw the deployment of over 80 strings carrying more than 5,000 sensors, transforming roughly one cubic kilometer of pristine ice into the largest particle detector ever built. The project cost an estimated $300 million, funded primarily by the US National Science Foundation (NSF) alongside European partners.

- John Learned's early 1970s ocean array project ended abruptly in 1993 following a fatal saltwater short circuit. - IceCube boreholes reach 2.5 kilometers into the ice cap using hot-water drilling techniques. - The completed IceCube array encompasses more than 80 cable strings housing over 5,000 individual digital optical modules. - The detector monitors approximately one cubic kilometer of clear Antarctic ice. - Project financing totaled around $300 million, supported primarily by the US NSF with European participation.

[03:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yILp9vsw1eI&t=199s) Extreme Energies and Questionable Practical Benefit

IceCube successfully observed high-energy neutrinos originating beyond our galaxy, registering events with astonishingly high energies. The most energetic neutrino recorded reached approximately 20 peta-electronvolts (PeV, or $10^{15}\text{ eV}$). While this figure appears roughly 1,000 times higher than the collision energies reached at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), translating the fixed-target collision into the center-of-mass frame reveals that the interaction energies are roughly comparable. Some of these neutrinos are definitively traced to active galactic nuclei (AGN), but the precise astrophysical origin of the vast majority remains unknown.

Despite the technical triumph, the award prompts sharp skepticism regarding its broader significance and alignment with Alfred Nobel’s founding charter:

> "What have we learned from it? Well, we have learned that these neutrinos exist. Which no one doubted. What is it good for? Nothing, really... by Alfred Nobel’s will, the prize is to be awarded to those who have 'conferred the greatest benefit to humankind' in the preceding year. And what is the benefit of this exactly?"

The decision highlights a growing sense of detachment within fundamental physics. While Halzen is universally recognized as an accomplished and deserving scientist, the award highlights how far foundational physics has drifted from practical utility. Selecting IceCube over other major observational milestones also feels somewhat arbitrary:

- The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) leadership could have been recognized for measuring baryon acoustic oscillations. - The team behind the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) provided landmark observations of the earliest cosmic galaxies. - The Parkes Observatory team discovered fast radio bursts (FRBs), whose exact causes remain an active cosmic mystery. - Theorists Alan Guth and Andrei Linde have long been shortlisted for cosmic inflation, though their nomination may be deemed too controversial by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences due to unintended associations with endorsing the multiverse hypothesis. - As a deadpan takeaway: "humankind can now sleep soundly knowing that very energetic neutrinos are, indeed, passing straight through the bed."

[05:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yILp9vsw1eI&t=358s) Ground News Sponsorship and Media Framing

Navigating daily global news requires efficient tools to cut through media polarization and sensationalized reporting. Ground News aggregates international reporting across outlets, sparing readers from having to wade through dozens of identical articles by providing centralized summaries alongside comparative media bias analysis.

A recent example involves coverage of automated artificial intelligence agents attempting to compromise a Canadian government website. Ground News highlights how political leanings shift the narrative framing: left-leaning news outlets frame the event as part of a troubling pattern of rogue AI tools, whereas right-leaning sources emphasize that the attempt failed and that nothing of consequence took place. The platform also details source ownership, fact-check ratings, and geopolitical reach, helping readers gauge whether a specific news development is being blown out of proportion, downplayed, or distorted. A 40% discount on the comprehensive Vantage plan is offered via ground.news/sabine.

## Notable quotes > [03:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yILp9vsw1eI&t=199s) What have we learned from it? Well, we have learned that these neutrinos exist. Which no one doubted. What is it good for? Nothing, really... by Alfred Nobel’s will, the prize is to be awarded to those who have 'conferred the greatest benefit to humankind' in the preceding year. And what is the benefit of this exactly? — Sabine Hossenfelder

> [03:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yILp9vsw1eI&t=199s) humankind can now sleep soundly knowing that very energetic neutrinos are, indeed, passing straight through the bed. — Sabine Hossenfelder

## Mentioned 2026 Nobel Prize in Physics, Alan Guth, Alan Martin, Alfred Nobel, Andrei Linde, Francis Halzen, Ground News, IceCube Neutrino Observatory, James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), John Learned, Large Hadron Collider (LHC), National Science Foundation (NSF), Parkes Observatory, Quarks and Leptons, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Sabine Hossenfelder, Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS)

## Video description Go to https://ground.news/sabine to get 40% off the Vantage plan and see through sensationalized reporting. Stay fully informed on events around the world with Ground News.

The Nobel Prize in physics 2026 has been awarded! Today I have a quick look at who won it and for what and what we have learned from it.

#NobelPrize #physics #sciencenews

👕T-shirts, mugs, posters and more: ➜ https://sabines-store.dashery.com/ 💌 Support me on Donorbox ➜ https://donorbox.org/swtg 👉 Transcript with links to references on Patreon ➜ https://www.patreon.com/Sabine 📝 Transcripts and written news on Substack ➜ https://sciencewtg.substack.com/ 📩 Free weekly science newsletter ➜ https://sabinehossenfelder.com/newsletter/ 👂 Audio only podcast ➜ https://open.spotify.com/show/0MkNfXlKnMPEUMEeKQYmYC 🔗 Join this channel to get access to perks ➜ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1yNl2E66ZzKApQdRuTQ4tw/join 📚 Buy my book ➜ https://amzn.to/3HSAWJW

[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yILp9vsw1eI)

中文简报

2026年物理诺奖：说了这话你可能会讨厌我 2026年诺贝尔物理学奖单独授予了Francis Halzen，以表彰他利用冰立方中微子天文台（IceCube Neutrino Observatory）探测到高能宇宙中微子，他也成为32年来首位独享物理学奖的科学家。冰立方通过监测南极洲一立方公里的冰层，成功探测到能量高达20 PeV的极端中微子，实现了此前在深海实验中未能成功的构想。然而，Sabine Hossenfelder质疑这一发现是否真正契合阿尔弗雷德·诺贝尔造福人类的宗旨，指出证实本就无人怀疑其存在的粒子几乎没有实际效用。她还强调，与詹姆斯·韦布空间望远镜（James Webb Space Telescope）的发现或快速射电暴的发现等其他重大天体物理学里程碑相比，此次委员会的选择显得有些随意。 Francis Halzen因探测到高能宇宙中微子而独揽2026年诺贝尔物理学奖，成为32年来首位单独获奖的物理学奖得主。 (0:00) 冰立方中微子天文台耗资约3亿美元，通过埋在地下2.5公里深处的5000个光学传感器，将南极一立方公里的冰层打造为全球最大的粒子探测器。 (1:47) 尽管冰立方探测到了能量高达20 PeV的宇宙中微子，但这引发了批评，外界质疑证实大家都早已预料存在的粒子是否符合阿尔弗雷德·诺贝尔造福人类的遗愿。 (3:19) 该决定凸显了评选委员会选择的随意性，略过了詹姆斯·韦布空间望远镜（James Webb Space Telescope）和斯隆数字巡天（Sloan Digital Sky Survey）等其他里程碑式的观测成果。 (3:19)

Reading summary

Sabine Hossenfelder argues that Francis Halzen's solo 2026 Nobel Prize in Physics for IceCube's cosmic neutrino detections celebrates a massive engineering feat that ultimately offers no practical benefit to humanity, reflecting fundamental physics' increasing detachment from societal utility. A Historic Solo Nobel for Neutrino Physics (0:00) The 2026 Nobel Prize in Physics surprised the scientific community by honoring Francis Halzen alone, marking the first time in 32 years that an individual has won the physics prize without co-recipients. Halzen, renowned among physicists as the co-author of the standard textbook Quarks and Leptons, received the award for measuring high-energy cosmic neutrinos originating billions of light-years away. Neutrinos are electrically neutral fundamental particles that travel marginally below the speed of light with minuscule mass. Because they interact exceptionally rarely with atomic matter, these particles can pass undisturbed through stars and planets, functioning as cosmic messengers that carry uncorrupted information from deep astrophysical environments as well as local sources like the Sun and nuclear reactors. From Ocean Setbacks to Antarctic Ice (1:47) Detecting rare neutrino collisions requires huge volumes of clear matter. The concept dates to the 1970s, when John Learned proposed anchoring detector cables in the ocean off Hawaii; however, that initiative ended in 1993 after a seawater leak short-circuited the array and cost the project its government funding. Halzen adapted this underwater strategy to the Antarctic ice sheet, leading the creation of the IceCube Neutrino Observatory at the South Pole. Engineers deployed hot-water drills to melt 2.5-kilometer-deep boreholes into the ice cap, lowering strings of optical sensors that were frozen in place. Overseen by Halzen and supported by a $300 million investment from the US National Science Foundation and European partners, the array encompasses over 80 strings and more than 5,000 sensors, transforming one cubic kilometer of clear Antarctic ice into the largest particle detector ever built. Extreme Measurements versus Practical Benefit (3:19) IceCube has detected neutrinos from beyond the Milky Way with energies reaching up to 20 peta-electronvolts (PeV). Although this interaction energy appears 1,000 times greater than the Large Hadron Collider in fixed-target figures, its center-of-mass collision energy is roughly equivalent to the collider. While some detected neutrinos originate in active galactic nuclei, the specific astrophysical sources for most remain unidentified. Hossenfelder questions the broader relevance of these observations, contending that the award conflicts with Alfred Nobel’s charter specifying that prizes honor discoveries conferring the greatest benefit to humankind. She asserts that confirming the existence of high-energy cosmic neutrinos provides zero practical utility, serving as an example of foundational physics celebrating discoveries that have no tangible application. Arbitrary Recognition Amid Alternative Breakthroughs (3:19) Hossenfelder also contends that the Nobel committee's choice appears arbitrary when weighed against other major observational and theoretical achievements. Unrewarded candidates include the Sloan Digital Sky Survey for measuring baryon acoustic oscillations, the James Webb Space Telescope team for observing the earliest cosmic galaxies, and the Parkes Observatory for discovering fast radio bursts. Additionally, prominent cosmological theorists Alan Guth and Andrei Linde remain unawarded for cosmic inflation. Hossenfelder suggests the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences may hesitate to recognize inflationary theory because of its controversial associations with the multiverse hypothesis. While Halzen's experimental leadership established IceCube as a monumental technical achievement, the award raises unresolved questions about whether contemporary Nobel selections in fundamental astrophysics align with Alfred Nobel's original requirement of tangible human benefit.

Source quotes

[3:19] Sabine Hossenfelder: What have we learned from it? Well, we have learned that these neutrinos exist. Which no one doubted. What is it good for? Nothing, really... by Alfred Nobel’s will, the prize is to be awarded to those who have 'conferred the greatest benefit to humankind' in the preceding year. And what is the benefit of this exactly? [3:19] Sabine Hossenfelder: humankind can now sleep soundly knowing that very energetic neutrinos are, indeed, passing straight through the bed.

Original transcript

[0:00] The 2026 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to Francis Halzen for measuring neutrinos [0:07] from out there in the cosmos, billions of light years away. Halzen is the first to [0:12] win a Nobel Prize in physics alone for 32 years. I didn’t have him on my radar [0:18] and few others did. So this is a big surprise. Just exactly what did he do, [0:23] why does it matter, and what have we learned from it? Let’s have a look. [0:27] Francis Halzen will be a familiar name for many students because he [0:31] wrote a famous textbook with Alan Martin about Quarks and Leptons, [0:36] basically mandatory literature if you want to work on particle physics. This Nobel Prize [0:41] sits at the intersection of particle physics, cosmology, and astrophysics. [0:46] Neutrinos are one of the fundamental particles of nature. There are three different neutrinos, [0:52] the electron-neutrino, the muon-neutrino, and the tau-neutrino. They are electrically neutral [0:58] and often described as “ghostly” because they pass through atomic matter mostly undisturbed. [1:05] It is very very rare that they bump into anything. Neutrinos are also special in that [1:10] their masses are very very small, so they move almost, but not exactly at the speed of light. [1:16] Neutrinos are produced in nuclear reactions a lot, so nuclear power plants and also nuclear [1:23] bomb explosions emit a lot of neutrinos. The sun also showers us with large amounts of neutrinos. [1:30] But neutrinos should also reach us from elsewhere in the universe and they are yet another way [1:36] to look at what is happening out there, and to learn how our universe is made up, how it works, [1:42] and how it came into being. This, in a nutshell, is what this year’s Nobel Prize is about. [1:47] In the 1970s, John Learned in Hawaii had the idea to look for neutrinos from the universe, [1:54] not from our planet, not from our sun, but from other stars or other galaxies, billions [2:00] of light years away. But since neutrinos pass through matter mostly without leaving a trace, [2:05] one needs a giant detector to see the occasional trace that they do leave. [2:10] His idea was to hang long strings of detectors down into the ocean [2:15] and anchor them into the sea floor. But the project took decades to get going, [2:21] and then, in 1993, the first string of detectors had a water leak and died from [2:26] a short circuit within hours. After that the US government scrapped the funding. [2:32] The IceCube detector is basically the same idea, just in ice. They are drilling holes into the ice [2:39] on the South Pole, about 2 and a half kilometres deep. The holes are being drilled with hot water, [2:45] then they lower strings, each with about 60 sensors into it, and let the water freeze. [2:50] They have more than 80 of these detector strings now, with together more than 5000 detectors that [2:56] cover about one cubic square kilometre. It’s the largest detector ever built. [3:01] It was mostly paid by the US-American National Science Foundation (NSF) with [3:06] contributions from some European countries, and it cost an estimated $300 million. Halzen, [3:13] who was awarded the Nobel Prize, has been the principal investigator since the beginning. [3:19] And, yes, they did see neutrinos from outside our galaxy. Some of them have [3:25] amazingly high energy. The highest one they detected had about 20 Peta Electron volt, [3:31] Peta is 10^15. So on the face of it, the energy seems to be more than 1000 [3:36] times higher than the energy of the Large Hadron Collider. Though if you convert [3:41] this into the centre of mass system the energies are kind of comparable. [3:46] Where do the neutrinos come from? That's a very good question. Some of them clearly come [3:51] from active galactic nuclei. But for most of the neutrinos, astrophysicists currently just [3:56] don’t know where they come from. What have we learned from it? Well, we have learned that [4:00] these neutrinos exist. Which no one doubted. What is it good for? Nothing, really. I mean, [4:07] it does teach us something about neutrino sources outside our galaxy. But that’s pretty much it. [4:13] Now look, this is a great detector and Halzen is very deserving regardless, but to me this Nobel [4:20] Prize just documents how irrelevant the foundations of physics have become. Okay, [4:25] so we’ve built a big detector to measure even more neutrinos than we measured before. But by [4:30] Alfred Nobel’s will, the prize is to be awarded to those who have “conferred the [4:36] greatest benefit to humankind” in the preceding year. And what is the benefit of this exactly? [4:41] It also seems rather random. I mean, why not give a Nobel Prize to the leaders of SDSS for [4:48] confirming baryon acoustic oscillations. Or to some people related to the James [4:52] Webb telescope for observing the first galaxies. Or to Parkes for discovering [4:57] fast radio bursts that we still don’t know what they are. These are all great [5:01] experiments and I don’t see how we have learned more from IceCube then from them. [5:06] The bottom line is that in this case I can't quite follow the reasoning of the Nobel Prize committee. [5:12] It is well known that they like to rotate through different areas of physics, and we haven’t had a [5:17] Nobel Prize in astrophysics/cosmology since 2020. The candidates that many people had on [5:24] their list were Guth and Linde for inflation. But maybe this was too controversial for the [5:30] Royal Swedish Academy as it could have been misconstrued as endorsing the multiverse. [5:35] Again, it’s a wonderful experiment and the winner is doubtlessly a [5:39] highly accomplished scientist who totally deserves the award, [5:43] but to me it sadly demonstrates just how little benefit physics now brings to humankind. [5:50] But humankind can now sleep soundly knowing that very energetic neutrinos are, [5:55] indeed, passing straight through the bed. [5:58] I read a lot of news to keep you well informed. [6:01] And the most useful and time-saving way I found to do this is with Ground News, [6:06] who've been sponsoring this video. Ground News is a news platform that collects news from all [6:13] over the world. It really saves me a lot of time because I don't have to sort through a [6:18] dozen headlines on the same story. I can just get a quick summary of all the coverage. And Ground [6:24] News also gives you a lot of extra information at one glance. Take for example this recent story [6:30] about the AI agents that tried to hack a Canadian government website. Ground News gives you a brief [6:37] summary here. This really saves me so much time. They also have this interesting bias comparison. [6:43] This tells you that left-leaning outlets see a pattern of misbehaving AI agents whereas [6:49] right-leaning ones stress that well actually nothing happened. Ground News also gives you [6:54] a fact check for each news item. tells you who owns the media outlets and shows you where the [7:00] news has appeared. I found this to be super useful for checking whether stories being [7:05] blown out of proportion, ignored or distorted. And of course, I have a special offer for you. [7:10] That's a 40% discount on the Vantage plan, which gives you access to all their features. All you [7:16] need to do is use my link ground.news/sabine or use the QR code so they'll know I sent you.