Global Meet-Up #4 (Austin, Texas): American Prophecy

第4场全球见面会（德克萨斯州奥斯汀）：美国预言 在全美巡回见面会的奥斯汀站中，姜教授（Professor Jiang）发表了题为“美国预言”的演讲，概述了他对美国未来数十年的宏观预测。他推断短至中期内唐纳德·特朗普将寻求突破任期限制并试图向外扩张，但国内外的制度撕裂与过度扩张将引发动荡，乃至导致国家走向巴尔干化式的内乱；而在更长远的未来，随着权力重心向内陆转移，以奥斯汀为核心并融合基督教民族主义与人工智能监控的技术神权政体或将崛起。 姜教授在全美巡回见面会奥斯汀站发表宏观演讲，预测特朗普短期内将力争第三任期以寻求司法豁免并顺应强硬的帝国地缘战略，效仿罗马帝国早期模式巩固权力。 中期预测认为，强行扩张、资本掠夺、AI泡沫破裂带来的白领失业潮以及国内精英分裂，将加剧城市抗争并最终引发局部内乱与国家巴尔干化。 长期预测展望美国权力中心将由沿海迁移至德克萨斯州，奥斯汀或将成为技术枢纽，并在传统金钱激励耗尽后，形成结合基督教民族主义与AI脑机监控的统治架构。

Professor Jiang forecasts that the United States will fracture following an autocratic third term under Donald Trump, relocating its cultural and technological core to Texas before reconstituting as a Christian AI theocracy. He contends that this breakdown is driven by elite eschatological ambition and structural economic bubbles, functioning as an unavoidable crucible for individual spiritual awakening. Autocratic Imperial Consolidation and Religious Conversion (11:42) Jiang forecasts that Donald Trump will secure an unprecedented third presidential term, dismantling constitutional constraints and establishing a functional American monarchy. Drawing a direct historical parallel to Augustus Caesar after the Battle of Actium, Jiang claims Trump will consolidate power by securing dedicated armed forces loyal to the executive rather than the republic, pointing to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and allied Pentagon factions as the modern equivalent of Rome's praetorian guard funded by Egyptian revenues. Alongside this political centralization, Jiang predicts Trump will experience an authentic late-career religious conversion rather than a public relations maneuver. Comparing Trump's projected trajectory to Emperor Constantine and Emperor Ashoka—rulers who adopted universal faiths following brutal campaigns of conquest—Jiang argues this spiritual shift will lead Trump to elevate Christian nationalism into an imperial state ideology. Economic Fragility, Oligarchic Schisms, and Mobilization (21:12) According to Jiang, foreign imperial overreach into Latin America and confrontation with Iran will precipitate a severe midterm crisis within the United States. Politically sidelined and excluded from conventional governance, legacy Wall Street factions will clash with the administration's favored Silicon Valley tech oligarchs, triggering urban unrest and insurgencies in cities like Boston and New York. Jiang attributes this instability to predatory venture capitalists who extract short-term imperial profits, offload long-term occupation costs onto domestic taxpayers, and transfer capital overseas to financial hubs such as Dubai and Singapore. Compounding this political rupture, Jiang warns of an impending 'white-collar apocalypse' mirroring the deindustrialization of the 1980s and 1990s. He asserts that speculative artificial intelligence spending accounts for roughly 50 percent of recent GDP growth despite lacking proven profitability models. When this bubble collapses amidst war-driven supply chain failures, Jiang anticipates widespread professional unemployment, prompting the federal government to institute a national draft and New Deal-style youth mobilization programs to control civil unrest. The Texas Pivot and the Technate (32:55) Jiang argues that American social cohesion has eroded because the nation relies entirely on transactional financial rewards rather than shared intrinsic values. As coastal metropolises decline under demographic stagnation and social strain, the national center of gravity will permanently migrate toward the American South. Texas, and Austin in particular, is positioned as the future seat of technological and administrative authority, underpinned by higher regional fertility rates and entrenched Christian cultural norms. This southern realignment aligns with what Jiang identifies as Freemasonic eschatology, which seeks to establish a continent-spanning rationalist empire termed the 'Technate.' This vision entails hemispheric consolidation—integrating Canada, Greenland, Mexico, and northern South America—and deploying artificial intelligence, such as clandestine White House computing infrastructure, for pervasive behavioral coordination. Over time, Jiang forecasts that omniscient digital governance will render traditional paper and central bank currencies obsolete, replacing monetary incentives with algorithmic rationing and provoking direct clashes with legacy central bankers. Elite Eschatology, Suffering, and Spiritual Awakening (127:58) Jiang challenges purely rational geopolitical models, asserting that ruling elites act on eschatological scripts rather than conventional statecraft. He notes that Silicon Valley figures draw heavily on Isaac Asimov's Foundation series to justify accelerating historical collapse to shorten cyclical dark ages, while Middle Eastern warfare follows deliberate apocalyptic frameworks designed to precipitate the biblical war of Gog and Magog. Furthermore, Jiang alleges that ruling systems deliberately employ structural trauma, analogous to ancient Spartan upbringing, to condition administrators for state control. Rather than seeking to avert this civilizational decline, Jiang frames coming disruptions as necessary for spiritual evolution. He asserts that modern consumer comforts detach humans from the divine Source, or 'Monad,' and that meaningful moral consciousness requires hitting rock bottom. As the society transitions from the 'Age of Entrepreneurs' to an 'Age of Prophets,' Jiang advises individuals to reject algorithmic distractions, study classical foundational texts, and form self-reliant rural and intellectual communities grounded in shared truth and natural resilience. Jiang frames his forecasts as macro-historical interpretations based on game theory and ancient patterns rather than a political manual or fatalistic doom. However, his analysis leaves largely unresolved how localized communities can practically maintain technological resilience when modern hardware remains entirely reliant on fragile, globally centralized semiconductor supply chains.

[0:00] He loves his iPad. [0:10] >> Okay, wonderful evening everybody. [0:14] I'd like to thank everyone for coming [0:16] for coming to Professor Jang's Austin, [0:18] Texas meeting. I'm Jin Ta Cho and I [0:22] organized this event. Soon there will be [0:26] a lecture by Mr. Janguin [0:29] followed by a fireside chat and a Q&A [0:32] session. Once we are done, we will have [0:35] a socializing sessions where light food [0:38] and drinks will be provided. [0:40] Mr. Jang, who is known as Professor [0:43] Jang, started posting his classroom [0:46] lectures on his YouTube channel called [0:49] Predictive History, which became an [0:52] internet sensation for his unique [0:54] opinions. Since then, he has appeared [0:58] for interviews on numerous prominent TV [1:01] news talks, podcasts, and live streams. [1:05] Without further ado, let's begin. [1:07] Professor J, whenever you're ready, and [1:09] let's give a round of applause for him. [1:13] Thank you so much. Um [applause] [1:18] um yeah, so my son and I have been [1:20] traveling around the United States for [1:21] the past three weeks and we've been [1:24] overwhelmed by the positive response. [1:26] We're doing on a we're doing some [1:28] podcasts and we've had four meetups so [1:30] far. Uh one in Los Angeles, uh next one [1:33] was in New York, Tampa, and this this is [1:35] the fourth. And I am overwhelmed by the [1:39] support of the community. Um, I I've [1:43] been doing YouTube for the past two [1:44] years. I blew up like um a year ago and [1:47] I became really viral six months ago, [1:50] but I never really had a chance to meet [1:51] my community and [1:53] um I was just curious as to why people [1:57] are watching my videos and who who they [2:00] are and um h and having been to many [2:03] places I am surprised by the diversity [2:06] of the audience. It is just any [2:08] demographic. Uh you'll have one uh at [2:12] least one person who likes my videos. I [2:15] am also overwhelmed by the uh [2:18] enthusiasm. Um it seems as though I'm [2:22] really changing lives for the better. [2:25] Someone in Tampa told me that um after [2:28] watching my videos, he started getting [2:30] better. He started to get along better [2:32] with his parents. And I really didn't [2:34] see the connection. But I'm really happy [2:36] that you know uh his life is better. But [2:41] um so I I feel as though um I've started [2:44] a movement there and I feel as though [2:47] the sparks in people it's starting to [2:49] glow and together we're creating a [2:52] beautiful movement. It's a global [2:53] awakening. So thank you so much everyone [2:56] for being here and I look forward to uh [2:59] meeting all of you later today. So um [3:02] without further ado I want to do a [3:04] presentation [3:05] uh for you guys a lecture um and it is [3:09] on what I believe will happen United [3:12] States over the next 50 years. Okay it's [3:15] called American prophecy my prophecy for [3:17] the United States guys. All right so [3:20] this class is going to be wild. All [3:22] right so prophecy and I'm going to give [3:25] you the short term the midterm and the [3:28] long term. short term [3:31] is I think Trump gets his third term. [3:35] Okay. And I'm going to I I'm sorry. Yes. [3:39] Okay. I am not manipulating the future. [3:42] I'm just foretelling the future. Okay. [3:45] So, I think Trump gets his third term [3:47] and I will explain why he'll get his [3:49] third term and what it means for the uh [3:53] United States. Okay? That's my first [3:55] prediction. second and then uh midterm I [3:59] think what's going to happen is a civil [4:00] war uh which will lead to the [4:02] balconization [4:05] of the United States and in the long [4:07] term what I think is going to happen [4:09] okay and we're talking like maybe 20 [4:11] years from now uh the United States will [4:14] become a Christian AI theocracy okay so [4:19] Christian plus AI and uh why I'm doing [4:25] in Austin is I think that Austin will be [4:28] the new center of gravity United States. [4:30] I think what's going to happen over the [4:31] next 20 years is that the center of [4:33] gravity will shift from the coast to the [4:36] center to to the heartland. I think uh [4:40] that New York City, Los Angeles, these [4:43] cities will cease to be relevant and [4:45] Austin will be the new capital of the [4:47] United States. Not like political [4:49] capital but the new cultural, economic, [4:51] technological capital of the United [4:54] States. And I think that um uh the [4:57] United States will become much more [4:58] theocratic over time. Okay. So these are [5:00] my predictions for the next 30 years. Um [5:04] and I want I want I want to explain to [5:06] you my reasoning for these predictions [5:09] and then paint you a picture of what [5:11] this means uh for for you. Okay. So the [5:16] first thing is Trump's third term. [5:19] Why is he getting a third term? I'm [5:22] fairly convinced that right now he is [5:26] intent on remaining in power [snorts] [5:30] and he will succeed. Um if you look at [5:33] his actions um over the over the past [5:37] three four past two years um there are [5:40] certain things that he's done that don't [5:43] really make sense unless he was planning [5:45] to stay in power for a long long time. [5:47] So the first thing of course is his [5:49] corruption. So, his family has made [5:51] billions of dollars in cryptocurrency [5:55] and the Democratic Party, the Democrats [5:58] are assembling dossas [6:00] um of evidence that will be used against [6:02] him the moment he leaves office. Okay? [6:05] So, I don't think Trump's that stupid. [6:07] Um Trump, for all his fault, he's very [6:09] good at skirting the law. So, if you [6:11] look at at his entire career, everything [6:13] he's done in New York City, um it's been [6:17] unethical. It's been uh very corrupt. [6:21] It's been amoral, but it's never been [6:24] illegal. Okay? Whereas clearly the [6:27] things he's been doing uh in Washington [6:30] DC have been uh illegal. And so you ask [6:33] yourself, why would he do that? Why [6:35] would a man who is very sensitive to a [6:37] law, why would he blatantly uh infringe [6:41] upon the law? Well, it's because the [6:43] Supreme Court has said that as long as [6:45] you're president of the United States, [6:47] you are above the law. Um there there's [6:50] a ruling before Trump took office and so [6:52] as long as he stays in office, he cannot [6:54] be pro prosecuted persecuted uh [6:56] prosecuted for anything he's done. Okay. [6:59] Um why would he stay in power uh beyond [7:03] 2028? The answer is the United the [7:06] American Empire needs someone like him. [7:09] So if you go back to Biden to the Biden [7:11] era, um the American Empire was in [7:15] paralysis because basically Biden was [7:18] scenile and the people around him didn't [7:20] have the balls or the authority to [7:25] promote imperial interest. Right? So the [7:27] classic example is when Putin invaded um [7:31] Ukraine uh on February 22nd 2022, [7:37] the Americans just complain a lot, [7:40] right? So before the invasion, Jake [7:43] Sullivan were saying, "Oh my god, [7:44] Putin's going to invade. Put going to [7:45] invade." And then after invasion is [7:48] like, "Well, you shouldn't have invaded, [7:49] so we're going to impose sanctions on [7:50] you." Okay? And Putin just ignored the [7:52] sanctions. And it it's been a disaster [7:55] for uh the United States. United States [7:58] during the Biden era came across as [8:02] ineffectual. Okay. So Trump is in power [8:06] and maybe from our perspective what he's [8:08] doing is goes against American [8:10] interests, but what he's doing is [8:13] aligned with American imperial [8:16] interests. Okay? And it's all been [8:18] accelerating. So, it seems as though [8:20] he's making up um making up for Biden's [8:24] lost presidency. And we're seeing um [8:27] basically uh this war in Iran is one [8:30] thing, but also uh the United States is [8:32] encouraging the remarization of Japan to [8:35] confront China. We're seeing an economic [8:38] detante uh repulsement between China and [8:41] the United States. We're seeing um the [8:44] war in Ukraine escalate. Okay. So, if [8:46] you if you want to know what's [8:47] happening, just read something called a [8:48] national defense strategy. National [8:50] defense strategy uh was published by the [8:53] Pentagon [8:55] in January of this year and it's calling [8:58] for exactly what Trump is doing. [9:02] basically rather than the United States [9:03] guaranteeing peace for the world pass [9:05] Americana basically divide the world [9:08] into regional uh balance of power that [9:12] allows America to be the to be basically [9:14] the godfather. Okay. So in um Europe [9:18] it'll be NATO versus Russia. In the [9:21] Middle East it'll be Israel plus the GCC [9:23] versus Iran. In East Asia it will be [9:26] Japan versus China. And this will allow [9:29] the United States to stay up to stay [9:31] above the fry while influence [9:33] influencing events. Okay. What how how [9:35] the United States will do so is one by [9:37] controlling all the major maritime choke [9:39] points including the Arctic Circle, the [9:41] straight of Jialter, the Panama Canal, [9:44] the Cape of Good Hope, uh the Laka, and [9:48] then uh controlling the world's [9:50] resources. Right? So if you want oil, [9:52] maybe in the future the only place you [9:54] get oil is the Western Hemisphere. Why? [9:56] because only the western hemisphere is [9:58] not at war. All right. So, um Trump is [10:03] implementing the national defense [10:04] strategy and the main purpose of the [10:05] national defense strategy of course is [10:06] to maintain America American imperial [10:09] interest even though it may go against [10:12] the interests of the nation as a whole. [10:15] Okay. When I mean imperial interest, I [10:17] basically mean the military-industrial [10:19] complex, right? You need someone like [10:21] Trump to forcefully [10:24] um uh impose American power around the [10:28] world. Uh Biden wasn't willing to do it. [10:30] Kamla Harris was probably too weak to do [10:32] it. Trump's the only person you have. [10:34] And that's why I think that Trump will [10:37] get a third term because the empire [10:39] needs Trump to get a third term. Okay. [10:42] Now, what I want to do now is explain to [10:44] you what the third term looks like. What [10:46] what is he going to do in a third term? [10:48] And this is going to surprise a lot of [10:50] people, but I think in his third term, [10:51] he's gonna be very different from his [10:53] first and second terms. That's a thing [10:55] that people don't appreciate about [10:57] Trump. He is able to change. You cannot [11:00] judge his actions um in the future from [11:04] uh things he's done in the past. So, in [11:07] the first term, he was not a very in he [11:09] was not a very effectual president. He [11:11] could he he really couldn't do get [11:12] anything done. um Russia gate really [11:15] hobble his presidency and uh the the [11:18] American military basically refused to [11:20] follow his orders. So so he he ordered [11:22] the withdrawal from Syria they basically [11:24] ignored him. Okay. So in his first term [11:26] he was not effectual. In his second term [11:28] he's a lot more uh effectual a lot more [11:31] effective. In his third term he's going [11:33] to be very different. The reason why is [11:35] in his third term he's basically a [11:37] monarch. Okay. If he's able to get a [11:39] third term he'll probably get a fourth [11:40] term and a fifth term. And I I [11:42] understand yes he's very old. Uh but but [11:46] just like hear me out. Okay. Um so to [11:49] understand how he's going to behave in [11:51] his third term, let's use a historical [11:53] analogy. The historical analogy is a [11:56] Caesar when he comes to power after the [11:59] defeat of Mark Anthony at the um uh the [12:03] battle of um sorry the name is it was it [12:07] um what's that battle called? the the [12:09] the major sea battle between Mark [12:11] Anthony and Octavius. [12:13] Jebity question. [12:14] >> Was it Actium? Was it Actium? [12:18] >> Was it Actum? Maybe it was Actum. Who [12:19] cares? Okay, it doesn't matter. But [12:21] after he he w he wins, he's now the [12:23] dominant uh power in the Roman Empire. [12:26] And he does three things in order to [12:27] consolidate his power. Okay. The first [12:30] thing he does is he basically privatizes [12:34] the army. Okay. So before the Roman [12:38] legions were paid by the state and also [12:41] is like nope in the future I myself will [12:44] pay every person in the Roman legion and [12:48] how and and how was he able to do that? [12:50] He took over Egypt. Egypt became his [12:52] personal property and Egypt at at that [12:55] time was a bread basket of the world. [12:56] Okay? It was producing most of the food [12:58] for the Roman Empire. So if you control [13:00] Egypt you control all the money and he [13:02] took all this wealth and then paid his [13:04] soldiers. Okay? So I think Trump will [13:08] establish his own private military and [13:11] we're already seeing that happen with [13:12] ICE. Okay. But there are also elements [13:15] with within the Pentagon who are very [13:16] loyal to Trump. That's the first thing [13:17] you you will see in his third term. [13:20] Second thing um is that um August Caesar [13:25] did was he recognized that he cannot [13:30] fight all the powerful factions in the [13:32] Roman Empire. There's just too many of [13:34] them. So what he did was he bribed them. [13:36] He co-opted them. How? He gave them [13:40] provinces. [13:41] Okay? He basically said rather than [13:44] fight me, let me give you Sicily and you [13:46] can go run that any way you want as long [13:48] as you stay loyal to me. So what Trump [13:51] will do is he will basically colonize [13:53] the entire Western Hemisphere. Okay? [13:57] Canada, Greenland, Iceland, Mexico, [14:01] Venezuela, Latin America, it will all [14:04] come under American control. And what [14:05] Trump will do is he will partition [14:09] the um colonies to powerful American [14:12] factions like multinationals. Okay. So [14:14] maybe Exxon gets control over the [14:16] Alberta tar sets. Okay. Does that make [14:19] sense? Okay. So basically, uh did you [14:22] have a question? See, Carney [14:25] just fought back. [14:28] >> Carney fought back strong. I mean, he's [14:30] the fifth largest corn bond holder. I'm [14:34] about arguing. [14:35] >> Okay. Right. So, so that's a good point. [14:37] Carney yesterday said, "We are not going [14:40] to do whatever you tell us. We rather [14:41] start a trade war." The pro there's [14:43] certain problems with Canada fighting [14:45] back. First of all, Canada cannot fight [14:48] back because has no military. Okay? The [14:50] idea of Canadians fighting against the [14:53] American empire is just the most [14:54] ridiculous thing I've ever heard in my [14:55] life. Okay, that's number one. Number [14:57] two is this economic relationship [15:00] between the United States and Canada. It [15:02] is not an equal one. It's not a fair [15:05] one. Canada sells the oil. America buys [15:08] the oil. Okay? If you are the buyer, [15:11] you're always right. So the idea that [15:14] okay, we won't sell you oil. Good luck [15:16] back in Canada, man. Good luck when you [15:18] have unemployment, when you're we have [15:20] inflation, when Alberta succeeds from [15:22] you. Okay. So, yes, Carne is saying, you [15:25] know, screw you, Trump. But Alberta [15:28] needs the American market. And if [15:31] Alberta is losing access to American [15:32] market, Alberta will probably succeed. [15:35] In fact, um, in October, uh, Alberta [15:38] Albertan voters are voting or not [15:41] whether to put on a ballot a succession [15:43] plan, okay? Or or a plan for [15:45] independence. So the idea that Canada [15:48] can fight back against the United [15:49] States, it's just absurd. Um, another [15:52] theory is that Carney is going to put up [15:54] a good fight, but eventually they'll [15:56] just have to surrender. Okay? Because [15:58] again, it is a non-equal relationship. [16:00] The United States has a military, Canada [16:02] does not. All right? Um, and um, [16:07] Canada exports most of its oil to the [16:10] United States. Canada in effect is a [16:12] resource colony for the United States. [16:14] Okay, this is not [16:16] this is not um a fight. Okay, so um I [16:20] think Trump will take over Greenland, [16:22] Iceland, Canada, uh Mexico, [16:25] um Cuba, Venezuela, basically all of uh [16:29] Latin America and North America and then [16:31] give it to all his friends. Okay, which [16:33] includes uh multinationals but also [16:36] includes um private individuals and [16:39] families as well. Okay, that's the [16:42] second thing he he's going to do. Okay. [16:43] Partition uh North America. And the [16:47] third thing he's going to do, which is [16:48] like the most strange thing because you [16:51] would never expect it from Trump, but [16:53] this is exactly what Augustus Caesar [16:54] did. Okay? And when August Caesar came [16:56] to power, his main obsession, his main [16:59] focus was to revitalize the Roman [17:02] religion. Okay? He became uh Pontipit [17:07] Maximus, the head priest of Rome. Why? [17:10] because he he thought that the major [17:13] problem for Rome at that time why you [17:16] know women were having babies and why [17:19] there were civil war is the lack of [17:21] religious virtue. So he sponsored the [17:24] writing of the iniad by Virgil um and he [17:29] um really promoted uh religious [17:31] practices in [17:34] um um in Rome. So Trump okay and I I [17:38] know this is going to be really strange. [17:40] Okay. But he's going to have a come to [17:42] Jesus moment. [17:44] >> Okay. [17:46] Come to Jesus. He He will in his third [17:47] time be like, "Oh my god, I have been so [17:50] wrong all my life. I shouldn't have like [17:53] so many porn stars. I shouldn't [17:56] have, you know, um, you know, start [17:59] these wars overseas." But now, okay, I'm [18:03] I have a come to Jesus moment and I want [18:05] to be the best Christian possible. I [18:07] want everyone else to be the best [18:09] Christian possible. So under Trump, you [18:11] will have this massive um push of [18:14] Christian values. Okay? And again, okay, [18:18] this is not something that he has [18:19] planned. This is something that people [18:22] around him don't necessarily have worked [18:24] out, but according to game theory, these [18:26] are three things he has to do if he [18:28] wants to maintain stability in his third [18:30] term. All right. So when August Caesar [18:34] came into power, the three things he did [18:37] um privatize the military, uh partition [18:40] the Roman Empire and then promote um [18:43] Roman religious values are things that [18:46] he he had to do in order to maintain his [18:48] hold on power and or these are things [18:52] that he did over time. Okay? Because he [18:54] had no choice in the matter. Same thing [18:56] what happened with Trump. Trump does not [18:57] have a plan for his third term. He only [18:59] wants to get his third term. But once he [19:01] gets his third term, according to game [19:03] theory, the best way for him to uh [19:05] maintain power is to do these three [19:08] things, okay? Have his own private [19:10] military, ICE, basically um work with [19:13] different factions to partition the [19:15] Western Hemisphere and promote [19:18] Christianity as a state religion. Okay. [19:22] All right. So, that is the short term. [19:25] Now, let's go to the midterm. Yeah. Is [19:27] that a real coming to Jesus moment for [19:29] him or is that just he's going to use [19:30] that as a way? [19:31] >> That's a great question. Yes, it's so [19:34] strange, but it's going to be real. [19:36] Okay, it is the strangest thing in the [19:38] world, but like we're like this guy is [19:39] the farthest from a from a Christian and [19:42] in fact there there rumors online that [19:43] he's converted to Judaism. Okay, but [19:46] when the time comes, he is going to have [19:49] a real come to Jesus moment. meaning in [19:52] his bedroom late at night while he's [19:54] watching while while he's like munch on [19:56] his cheeseburgers and watching Fox News, [19:58] Jesus will really come to him in his [20:00] bedroom and really talk to him and says, [20:02] "Hey, Trump." And it'll scare the [20:04] out of him and be like, "Okay, from now [20:06] on I'll be a good person." Okay, I know [20:09] it sounds kind of strange, but [20:11] historically we've seen these things [20:13] happen before. So the most famous [20:15] example is um Constantine, right? the [20:18] emperor of the Roman Empire who had won [20:21] these major wars against all his enemies [20:23] and now he's the sole emperor and then [20:25] he has a come to Jesus moment like oh [20:28] war is bad and we should never fight a [20:30] war again now that I'm the emperor so [20:33] let's all uh and he made Christianity [20:35] the official religion of the Roman of [20:37] the Roman Empire okay and he was the [20:38] first person to do so another example is [20:41] Ashoka who was an Indian emperor who [20:44] again won all his wars against his [20:46] enemies and he's like Oh, war is bad. [20:49] Let's do Buddhism instead. Okay. So, and [20:52] and I'm not saying this cynically. I'm [20:53] just saying like there's a pattern and [20:55] each time this happens, it is pretty [20:57] real. Okay. So, I think that Trump will [20:59] have a come to Jesus moment in his third [21:01] term. I don't know when, but uh he will [21:04] and his followers will will believe it [21:07] and he will promote Christianity as a [21:09] state religion. Okay. Um uh yes. [21:12] >> Yeah. If Trump were to actually get a [21:14] third term, do you think he'll actually [21:16] be successful in conquering the Western [21:18] Hemisphere? Because hasn't his [21:19] administration recruitment wildly [21:21] incompetent militarily? [21:23] >> That's a great point. Yeah. Exactly. So [21:25] the question is um okay, so you want to [21:27] colonize the Western Hemisphere, but [21:28] like are you going to succeed? The [21:29] answer is no. Okay, this is why I want [21:31] to go into into the midterm now. Okay, [21:33] so so so let me do the midterm pronoxys. [21:36] Okay. So while Trump is doing this, [21:39] there are certain issues, crises that [21:41] are created because of these policies. [21:44] Okay. The first is the Democrats will [21:47] become politically neutered. Okay. And [21:51] who are the main backers of Democrats? [21:53] Wall Street. All right. So what's going [21:55] to happen is um there will be winners [21:58] and losers in Trump's third term. Uh the [22:01] major winners will be the tech [22:03] oligarchs, people like Ellen Musk and [22:05] Peter Theo. the major losers will be [22:07] Wall Street and the Democrats and [22:09] they'll be pissed about it, right? And [22:11] what and so um what what they recognize [22:14] is that they can't actually win the [22:16] ballot box because um there's so much [22:18] cheating going on or Trump has [22:20] consolidated too much power. So their [22:23] response will be to instigate a civil [22:25] war. Um maybe at first it'll be [22:27] political assassinations, insurgencies [22:29] where where cities like Boston, New [22:32] York, Los Angeles refuse to uh follow [22:34] Trump's order. So Trump sends an ICE or [22:37] whatever. Okay. So uh maybe in the first [22:40] few years it will be [22:42] um a lot of uh insurgencies, a lot of um [22:47] political violence but not a full-scale [22:49] war but eventually it will messize into [22:51] a full-scale war. Okay. So that's the [22:53] first thing. That's the first issue. [22:55] Second issue is as you point out people [22:58] don't don't like it when they're [22:59] colonized. People don't like it when uh [23:02] you come in and like impose a government [23:05] on them. Okay. So look at Venezuela [23:07] where right now um you know um Venezuela [23:11] has is following US orders. So they've [23:14] withdrew from the ICC. Del Rodriguez is [23:16] doing what things a lot of things that [23:18] Trump wants. That's very different from [23:21] what Trump wants in the future, which is [23:23] to impose a colonial administration [23:25] upon Venezuela. Why? So his buddies can [23:28] steal as much as as much money as [23:31] possible from the Venezuelan people, [23:32] right? And when you do that, what's [23:34] going to happen is massive in interest [23:38] all around um Latin America. Okay? Maybe [23:41] not Canada, but definitely in Mexico, in [23:44] Latin America, in Venezuela, in [23:46] Colombia, okay? And the reason and the [23:48] reason why is [23:50] uh when Trump sends his buddies to [23:52] Venezuela, it's not to make the [23:54] Venezuelan economy much more efficient [23:55] so everyone can benefit. It just to be [23:57] carbon baggage is to steal as much as [23:59] much as possible in the short term. [24:01] Okay? So you will have massive [24:03] insurgencies throughout [24:06] uh [24:07] uh Latin um America. Okay. [24:12] All right. Um, [24:15] >> if these are if these are such [24:16] predictable failures like the like the [24:18] Iran war, why would the there's assuming [24:21] there's a a powerful United States deep [24:24] state committed to global hegemony, why [24:27] would Trump be allowed um to subjugate [24:31] and attack Western Hemisphere such [24:33] predictable [24:34] >> fail? Yeah. So, you're absolutely right [24:35] in nag. Okay. Why haven't the United [24:37] States done this sort of stuff in the [24:38] past before? Because everyone can tell [24:40] you it'd be a cluster Okay. Why [24:42] haven't the United States has just gone [24:43] and conquered the entire Western [24:44] Hemisphere? Because like you would just [24:46] create so much insurgencies that it's [24:48] not really worth the cost. So you're [24:50] absolutely right in that most analysts, [24:52] most um um deep state actors would be [24:56] like, "Let's not do this." Okay. The [24:58] problem is that the people around Trump [25:00] stand to benefit a great deal from from [25:04] this. So yeah, okay. the copper bagers [25:06] going to Venezuela and they create [25:08] create an issue and it's a complete [25:11] dumpster fire that the United States has [25:13] to deal with for the next hundred years. [25:14] They don't care because like they can [25:16] take the money and it's run off to Dubai [25:18] or Hong Kong or Singapore. Okay, try [25:21] your capital guys. Okay, that's how [25:22] things work. You use the nation state. [25:24] You you are parasite on the nation [25:25] state. All the costs are shorted by the [25:28] nation state and you weep all the [25:30] winnings. Okay, and and and so um that's [25:34] what will happen. Okay. So, you have the [25:37] Democrats trying to cause um uh uh [25:42] violence in United States to to [25:44] destabilize Trump regime. You have [25:46] violence throughout Latin America [25:48] because people do not like to be [25:50] colonized and uh Trump's buddies are [25:53] stealing everything in sight. Okay. The [25:55] third thing that's going to happen is a [25:57] economic collapse and a national draft. [26:00] Okay. [26:03] Um so the US economy right now it is not [26:06] sustainable the way it is. Um 50% of GDB [26:11] growth is AI speculation right so AI [26:14] data centers uh chat GBT but no one [26:17] knows how these things actually make [26:19] money in the long term it's all just you [26:22] know um um just a delusion. So [26:26] eventually this collapses and then you [26:27] have millions of people laid off. This [26:30] is really the white color apocalypse. [26:32] Okay. So, next 5 to 10 years you have a [26:35] white color apocalypse. In the 80s and [26:36] 90s, the United States transferred a lot [26:39] of jobs, blue color jobs, manufacturing [26:41] jobs from the United States over to [26:42] China. This was the blue blue color [26:45] apocalypse. We are now going to witness [26:46] the white color white color. Not just [26:49] because of the AI um bubble collapse, [26:52] but also because of the war in Iran, [26:54] right? Because of the war in Iran, the [26:56] entire global supply chain network, it's [26:58] breaking down. Some of you probably work [26:59] in the global supply chain network and [27:01] you know how hard it is now to source [27:03] materials, right? So, and if they can't [27:07] source materials, then they have to lay [27:09] off workers. Okay? So, in the next 5 to [27:10] 10 years, you're going to have economic [27:12] collapse, uh, white color apocalypse, [27:15] and then what the United States is going [27:16] to do is impose a national draft, not [27:19] just for war, but it's basically like a [27:22] federal works program. So, think about [27:23] the um Great Depression and how uh FDR [27:28] uh New Deal hired millions of people to [27:31] work in the for the tennis valley [27:32] authority uh different organizations. [27:34] So, the national draft is just a way to [27:36] control young people. Uh did you have a [27:39] question? [27:40] >> Uh yes sir. I was just wondering how far [27:42] does the AI surveillance state get in [27:45] the United States? [27:46] >> Yeah. Yeah. So, uh AI surveillance [27:50] that's a fifth thing. Okay. where um as [27:52] the the the economy collapses, as [27:55] violence surges and um as young people [27:59] rebelling system, you you will have an [28:02] increase in the AI surveillance state [28:04] and this is the one thing that is [28:05] growing very rapidly. Okay, so when the [28:08] AI bubble collapses, it does not mean [28:11] okay, Peter the has is out of a job. [28:13] Okay, that that's not what it means. It [28:15] just means what's going to happen is [28:17] [snorts] the US government is going to [28:19] come in and bail out the A companies. [28:20] Okay, they're too big to fail. Same as [28:23] same in the 2008 uh great financial [28:25] crisis where basically Wall Street [28:27] destroyed the global economy. What [28:29] happened? Well, the American government [28:31] came in, bailed them out, and they all [28:33] paid each other very hefty bonuses. [28:35] Okay? Same thing's going to happen here [28:36] where you're going to have the AI bubble [28:38] collapse and that's good for these [28:39] companies because the American [28:41] government will come in and absorb all [28:43] the losses. AI data data centers will be [28:45] nationalized and be be protected by the [28:48] military. So if you don't like AI [28:50] centers, too bad. Okay, it's eminent [28:52] domain now. Okay, you can't complain [28:54] about the water, the electricity. These [28:56] are military installations. So the AI [28:59] state will just grow and grow. Okay, but [29:02] as you can see, when you have these [29:04] elements in place in the midterm, you're [29:07] going to have massive chaos throughout [29:09] the United States, just civil war. I'm [29:11] not saying it'll be like, you know, [29:12] North versus South. It will be uh [29:15] Democrats versus Republicans. It will [29:17] just be the bulkanization of the United [29:19] States where each region is in conflict [29:22] especially the major cities uh New York [29:24] City, Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles. Um [29:28] so that I think will will will happen. [29:32] Okay. Another reason why civil war is [29:34] bound to happen is uh is because of the [29:37] particular [29:39] nature of the United States. The United [29:41] States is a unique society in that it [29:43] doesn't really have [29:45] um a ethnic nationalist creed. What [29:51] binds Americans together is the idea of [29:53] money, right? You're you you you know [29:55] you judge people based on how much money [29:57] they make and everyone aspires to make [29:59] money and that's what binds everyone [30:02] together, the love of making money. When [30:04] you have a study like that, that society [30:06] eventually exhausts itself. Okay. So, so [30:10] let me give you um an example. So, so [30:13] psychologists have run experiments, [30:15] right? So, you have two groups. The [30:18] first group does things just for [30:20] intrinsic motivation just because they [30:22] like it. Okay? So, for example, uh kid [30:24] the um uh psychologist will go into a [30:27] first grade class and like uh they'll [30:29] divide the class into two. The first is [30:31] draw just for fun. Okay? In the second [30:34] group, they'll they'll say, "Hey, draw [30:36] because we'll pay you for each painting [30:39] you make." Okay? And you can, as you can [30:41] imagine, in the first couple weeks, the [30:43] second group draws a lot of paintings [30:45] because they get money to go buy [30:47] chocolate and go see movies and watch [30:50] iPad, which which is what my son is [30:52] doing right now. Okay? But over time, [30:55] the second group exhausts itself. Okay? [30:58] It's all just intrinsic motivation. It's [31:00] all just love of money. But eventually [31:01] you get sick of it and you stop doing [31:04] it. But the first group continues and so [31:06] after maybe five years the psychologist [31:08] have discovered like the second group [31:10] refuse to draw. Okay? They just hate it [31:12] unless you pay them a lot of money. The [31:14] first group just continues to love to [31:16] draw. Okay? And this is a pretty [31:17] consistent finding in in social science. [31:19] And this this is we're finding United [31:21] States where for decades it's a love of [31:23] money that has really motivated [31:25] Americans. When you do that, you exhaust [31:28] people. Okay? especially those who um [31:32] don't make that much money, especially [31:33] young people nowadays. That's why young [31:35] people don't want to work because [31:37] they're exhausted by the idea of money, [31:39] but also there's really no opportunities [31:40] for social mobility in the greater uh [31:43] economy. Okay. So, um so yeah, you have [31:47] a civil war, you have the bulkanization [31:49] of the United States, and when this [31:52] happens, certain leaders will emerge. [31:56] And I don't know who will win but um I [32:00] think that in the long term the faction [32:04] that is most likely to win okay will [32:07] have certain characteristics. Okay. The [32:09] first is the winner will be based in [32:12] Texas. Okay. Austin. Okay. That's why [32:15] I'm giving this lecture because you guys [32:17] here will be the future center of [32:19] gravity of the United States. All right. [32:21] And I can feel that because I've been to [32:22] Los Angeles. I've been to New York. I've [32:25] been to um Florida and I can say look if [32:30] I were American I would move to Austin [32:32] today. I'm not American. I would love to [32:34] move to Austin. Okay. But um there's [32:36] certain reasons why. One is um this [32:39] place is extremely energetic. People [32:41] here work hard. Uh the cost of living is [32:44] pretty affordable compared with like New [32:47] York City or Los Angeles. I was in Santa [32:50] Monica. Um and it's like the zombie [32:52] apocalypse, man. I mean like the wealth [32:53] inequality is just obscene. The number [32:55] of homelessness is just crazy. And I and [32:58] I and I also like Austin because it's in [33:02] Texas and this is Christian country. [33:05] Okay, you may not be Christian, but [33:07] there are a lot of Christians and [33:09] they're very family orientated. Uh, so [33:12] Texas is probably I I actually don't [33:14] know, but I assume it's younger than [33:16] most US states and the fertility rate is [33:18] higher than most US states, especially [33:21] the west and east coast. Okay, so first [33:23] of all, I think like um uh whoever wins [33:26] will will come from Texas, Austin, the [33:29] South. Okay, that's number one. Number [33:31] two is this is a person who will espouse [33:34] Christian nationalism. Okay. So, I think [33:36] Christian nationalism really is the [33:38] future of the United States. If you [33:41] can't bind if you can't use money to [33:42] bind everyone together, then you need [33:44] you need to use religion. Okay. And the [33:46] religion that makes the most sense is [33:47] Christian nationalism. Um given what I [33:51] I've seen so far. And the third thing is [33:54] uh using AI in order to control [33:57] everyone. Okay. So, um, you know, Joe [34:00] Rogan was on the Jesse, um, uh, Michaels [34:04] podcast. And look, Joe Rogan does not do [34:07] other podcasts, okay? So, he went on [34:10] that podcast for a reason. And the [34:12] reason why is he said on that podcast, [34:15] Jesus will return as an AI. And that I [34:19] think could be prophetic. Okay? I think [34:21] that in the future um AI will combine [34:25] with Christianity and you know you might [34:29] have a microchip or neural link in your [34:31] brain where Jesus is talking to you [34:33] every single day and would that be a [34:34] great thing you know because then you [34:36] can do no no evil and you'll be a very [34:38] happy person because Jesus is your [34:40] personal God right yes [34:42] >> would there be religious persecution in [34:44] that environment right like the gnostic [34:47] Christians especially [34:50] Yeah. So, unfortunately, that's that's [34:52] why it's called theocracy, okay? Because [34:54] it doesn't really permit other [34:56] religions. So, if you're a homosexual, [34:59] too bad, guys. If you um are a woman who [35:03] wants to um work, uh too bad. You're [35:06] going to have you have kids, you have a [35:08] lot of kids. Um if you are, you know, [35:12] anost if you're gnostic or agnostic, [35:15] you're too bad. Okay. Now, I think that [35:17] the Christians will come to [35:18] accommodation with maybe the Muslims, [35:21] right, or and the Jews because they're [35:23] all religious and they're all seen as [35:25] part of the Abrahamic tradition, but um [35:29] they will not allow for homosexuals, for [35:33] deviants, [35:34] um for Yeah. Yeah. There'll be a lot of [35:37] persecution. Sorry. Uh yeah. Okay. All [35:40] right. Okay. So this is my picture for [35:45] the United States over the next um 30 40 [35:50] years and as you can imagine it's a very [35:53] bleak picture but guys it's much worse [35:56] everywhere else. Okay. [laughter] [35:58] All right. I mean the thing is that this [36:00] is probably the most optimistic picture [36:02] for any nation uh for the next 50 years. [36:05] And the reason why is the United States [36:07] for all of its problems, it is still [36:10] self-sufficient. Okay, look at Texas [36:12] where you can grow your own food and you [36:14] have your own energy supply. Um, it is [36:18] protected by two oceans. So, you have [36:20] actually no real enemies to face. Um, [36:23] and the people in United States are [36:25] still very energetic, very creative. [36:26] Okay, so I know this looks bad, but I [36:29] guarantee you this is probably the best [36:31] outcome of other of other nations. If [36:33] you look at a place like East Asia, [36:35] you're going to have basically hundreds [36:37] of millions starve to death. Okay? Same [36:39] with Africa. Europe is a dumpster fire. [36:43] Uh the Middle East, I'm not even going [36:45] to talk about, okay, it's pretty bad. [36:48] Okay? But um but yeah, so this is my [36:52] picture of what it looks like. And so [36:55] question, guys. Yes. [36:57] >> Where do you see esquetology overlapping [36:59] within that 30-year time frame? both in [37:02] like the United States but also abroad. [37:04] Um whether that's in the Middle East and [37:07] you know some of your predictions that [37:08] you've had with the um the third temple [37:12] and things like that. [37:13] >> Yeah, that's really interesting [37:14] question. Okay, so I talk about [37:16] esquetology, right? And believe it or [37:19] not, but the vision that I just present [37:23] to you uh back then it is actually part [37:26] of an esqueological tradition. Okay, [37:29] Freemasonry. All right. So um I talk a [37:33] lot about the Cabala and these men Jews [37:37] uh and the Islamists uh in the Middle [37:39] East. Then you have Russia the third [37:41] Rome prophecy. But the Freemasons have [37:43] their own prophecy and it should create [37:45] something called a technate. [37:48] All right. So there are certain things [37:50] distinctive about Freemasonry. Um [37:53] Freemasonry is basically a religion of [37:55] capitalism. [37:56] Okay. [37:59] And for them the highest god is reason. [38:03] Okay. So they believe that God does [38:08] exist but god does not participate in [38:11] the world. God created us in order to be [38:14] our own god in order to create the world [38:16] that we want. Okay. We call this theism. [38:19] Theism. [snorts] [38:23] And um for the freemasons the ultimate [38:27] god is reason. And the objective is to [38:30] make everyone reasonable. So beyond [38:33] prejudice, beyond tradition, beyond [38:36] family, beyond emotions, okay, just pure [38:39] reason. [38:40] Um, and the metaphor that they use is [38:43] imagine each person as a perfect cube, [38:47] okay? A perfect stone, a perfect cube. [38:50] And the person achieves this through [38:52] self-education, self-ultivation, [38:55] self-refinement. Okay? constantly [38:58] shaping your your soul into one that is [39:00] a perfect cube. Well, once you have that [39:03] cube in place and you put all the cubes [39:05] together, you can create a temple. Okay? [39:08] And then God can come live in this [39:11] temple. And that is the objective of [39:14] Freemasonry to um have everyone become a [39:19] perfect cube uh spiritually, okay, [39:22] through spiritual alchemy. And then once [39:24] we have that then God can come to our [39:25] world and live with us and we can all be [39:28] one temple. This will be paradise. [39:31] The problem though is [39:34] people don't people aren't really [39:36] reasonable and this will take forever. [39:38] Okay. So is there a mechanism which will [39:41] allow us to accelerate this process and [39:43] the answer is yes. It's called AI right [39:46] artificial intelligence. [39:49] Okay. So um if you know freemasonation [39:52] you know there's a G um in the square [39:55] and the compass right so so what does G [39:57] stand for? Well G stands for three [39:59] words. The first of course is God or uh [40:03] grand architect. Okay just the higher [40:05] being. Okay God. The second G is [40:09] geometry. [40:12] Okay because you know if you're free you [40:14] believe in using mathematics in order to [40:17] refine the world. Okay, geometry. The [40:19] last G that people don't appreciate is [40:21] something called the generative [40:23] principle. Generative principle. And the [40:26] idea here is that we as humans have the [40:29] capacity to create the world that we [40:31] want. Okay. Now when you put the three [40:35] G's together, God, geometry, gener [40:37] principle, you get a sentence, right? [40:39] Which is geometry [40:42] generates God. [40:45] Okay? Okay, which is AI, [40:47] right? What is AI? Artificial [40:48] intelligence. Sorry, what is AI? It's [40:50] mathematics. What what is ma ma ma ma [40:52] mathematics trying to do? It's trying to [40:54] replicate the mind of God. All right? [40:56] Now, we have AI in place. Now, it's [40:59] possible to turn everyone into a perfect [41:02] cube, right? Think of Neurolink, think [41:05] of um ChachiBT, right? So, everyone has [41:08] a mic has a microchip. Um, and then the [41:11] moment you're born, you are always on [41:15] the path to righteousness, to virtue, [41:18] right? Wouldn't that be the perfect [41:19] world? So that's the that's the world [41:23] they're trying to create. [snorts] Um, [41:27] so the technate [41:29] um this is a soul of the technate. Okay, [41:32] the technate um it also discusses the [41:34] physical boundaries [41:36] of paradise. And so the technate [41:42] um believes the US has to be at the [41:44] center of it. Okay, this is the new [41:45] Jerusalem. And the technate also wants [41:47] to absorb Canada, [41:49] Greenland [41:51] um and Latin America extending all the [41:53] way to Venezuela and Colombia. If you [41:56] look at this map, Trump, where is Trump [41:59] most aggressive? Well, he's been talking [42:01] about annising Canada, right? [42:05] He's talking about he's talking about [42:06] Greenland. He's he's talking about like [42:08] going after the cartels in Mexico. He's [42:10] he's he's taking over Venezuela. He's [42:12] also talking about Colombia. There's a [42:13] new right-wing president uh who's very [42:15] loyal to Trump in Colombia. Okay. This [42:17] is the technate guys. They are right now [42:19] achieving the technate. Okay. So, the [42:21] physical boundaries are uh so sorry so [42:25] let me finish. Okay. The physical [42:26] boundaries are now being set in place. [42:29] The actual operating system of the techn [42:32] is a monarchy. All right? So rather than [42:34] democracy, let's have a monarchy. Why? [42:36] Because it's much more efficient. So if [42:38] you've been following the news, um you [42:41] know that Trump is obsessed with [42:42] something called the ballroom, [42:44] >> right? The ballroom. He that's the thing [42:47] he cares the most about. He doesn't [42:48] really care about the one I ran. He [42:50] doesn't really care about anything else. [42:51] He cares about his stupid ballroom. [42:53] Okay? It's it's like the basically the [42:54] east wing. So why is he concerned about [42:57] the ballroom? Well, the answer is it's [42:59] not what it is that matters. It's what's [43:01] underneath it that that that matters. [43:03] Okay? So, you have the White House and [43:07] you have the ballroom. Okay? The [43:09] ballroom. [43:11] And what what you guys need to [43:14] appreciate is who the contractors for [43:17] this construction project are. And it's [43:19] often companies that specialize in [43:20] building data centers. All right? So, [43:23] they're digging a huge facility under [43:25] the ballroom. And this is meant to be a [43:27] data center. Why is this important? [43:30] Because this data center, because it's [43:32] by the White House, will be protected by [43:34] executive privilege. Congress has no [43:37] authority over what goes on in inside [43:41] this data center. Okay? So, what's going [43:43] to happen is the president will now be [43:46] able to have his own NSA, CIA, and FBI. [43:51] Okay? He's he'll be able to control the [43:54] entire United States from his White [43:55] House. This is an imperial presidency, [43:59] right? Imagine what a person can do if [44:01] he if he has all three agencies under [44:03] his control, the FBI, the CIA, and the [44:05] NSA. He will be able to monitor everyone [44:08] and basically blackmail everyone, right? [44:12] He will know what everyone wants, what [44:14] everyone does. um everything you've done [44:16] online will be will be able to be [44:19] accessed by the president of the United [44:21] States. [44:23] All right? So that's the idea here to [44:25] for the president to have the imperial [44:28] power. [44:30] Um and he established that through [44:32] information, right? Data [44:36] and this creates the um imperial [44:38] presidency, a monarch, a king. And [44:40] people like Carter Yarvin has grown [44:42] around saying how this is really the [44:44] future right now because of political [44:46] polarization democracy can no longer [44:47] work. You need an executive in charge in [44:50] order to run the country more [44:51] efficiently and so just make the [44:54] president into a king. Right? Okay. So [44:58] this is what um what the esquetology is [45:01] the Freemason esquetology. Okay. Number [45:03] one is a vision of using AI to sculpt uh [45:08] the like individuals perfectly. Number [45:10] two is to create the physical boundaries [45:13] of the United States so that it is [45:15] basically invincible. It is [45:16] impenetrable. Okay, it is [45:17] self-sufficient. Uh it it can never be [45:20] invaded. And the third thing is to [45:21] create a government structure that will [45:24] allow for the more efficient [45:26] um control of government. Okay. So this [45:29] is Freemason esquetology. [45:32] Uh uh sorry you you you had a question. [45:34] Yes. [45:34] >> Uh yes. I was just wondering um in [45:36] Freemasonry do perfecting cubes have uh [45:39] stark extrammarital relationships in the [45:41] midst of you know what's sort of like [45:44] World War II? [45:46] And if so that does not I think good [45:49] Christianity from my understanding. [45:52] >> Um yeah. Okay. So um yes I mean we can [46:01] we can look at the hypocrisy of the [46:02] Freemasons. Okay there's a lot of [46:04] hypocrisy. Uh the problem is this is [46:07] what they believe and this is what they [46:09] want to to achieve and they are very [46:12] utarian and they see Trump as a tool in [46:16] order to achieve this grand vision. [46:19] Trump doesn't see that way but they see [46:21] Trump that way. Right? Right. So if [46:23] you're Peter Theo, Elmas, uh, and you [46:25] believe in the technate, you believe in [46:27] this esquetology, then Trump is a useful [46:29] idiot in order to achieve this. Yeah. [46:32] Yeah. So, so you you you have a question [46:34] back there, [46:35] >> right? So I mean, how do you factor in [46:37] the power banks, [46:40] the the Bank of England was that that [46:43] power structure and sort of sort of the [46:46] anathema to [46:47] >> Yeah, that's a great question. Okay. So [46:50] in this conception, okay, what you're [46:52] doing is replacing the power of money [46:54] with AI. When you when you have AI, you [46:57] don't need money anymore, right? Because [47:00] money is a way to control people, to [47:02] motivate people. But if you have AI, if [47:05] if Jesus is talking to you, you don't [47:08] really need to make money anymore. Okay? [47:10] You might be given rations, but you [47:12] don't need to make money, right? So this [47:15] system is meant to replace [47:19] uh transational capitalism and that's [47:20] why there's a civil war and that's why [47:22] there will be a civil war because the [47:24] tech oligarchs if they get their way [47:25] money will become redundant right if [47:28] money becomes redundant the bankers will [47:29] lose all their power especi especially [47:31] the bank of the settlements the central [47:33] bankers right so they will fight for for [47:36] control because there's no empire that [47:39] that dies willingly that just volunteers [47:42] and says you know what um I've had a [47:45] 400 years, 500 years, now it's time for [47:47] me to pass a baton. Okay, that will [47:49] never happen. That's why you have a [47:51] civil war to burn things down. Okay. Um, [47:54] yes. [47:56] >> I have a question about Southeast Asia. [47:58] In one of your previous lectures, you [48:00] mentioned Malaysia being one of the four [48:02] countries uh that was a safe place to [48:04] live. [48:05] >> I didn't say that. Did I say that? [48:06] >> Yeah, I think it was New Zealand, [48:08] Malaysia, Chile, and Batswana. Those [48:11] were the four that [48:12] >> Did I say Malaysia? Yeah. Yeah. [48:15] >> Okay. I don't remember saying Malaysia, [48:16] but but but I was wrong. [48:17] >> Oh, [48:19] >> yeah. I I might go there, right? But I I [48:23] don't think Malaysia is that safe. I I [48:24] don't think any place in Southeast Asia [48:25] is safe. But but the others, Chile, New [48:28] Zealand, Batswana are considered safe. [48:30] Yes. [48:31] >> Okay, that answer my question. [48:32] >> Sorry. Uh yes. Do you think Trump might [48:36] have been genuinely convinced by some [48:39] party like the Israelis for instance [48:41] that he is the Antichrist? And that's [48:43] >> No, he's not the Antichrist. He's the [48:44] Messiah. [48:46] >> Come on, man. Get the terms correct. [48:48] He's not the Antichrist. He's the [48:49] Messiah. [laughter] [48:51] Come on. [48:53] Um [48:56] I think that Trump in his heart believes [48:59] he is a messiah because I mean like and [49:02] and and this is something about human [49:04] nature. You we cannot explain this [49:06] logically. Okay. But let's just say [49:08] you're something like Peter Theo and you [49:11] were born not rich or born middle class [49:14] and then um [49:18] you just magically become a billionaire. [49:21] How do you explain that to yourself? [49:24] Right? Well, most most of us will be [49:25] like, "Well, you just got a lucky [49:26] computer the Okay, but he doesn't [49:27] believe that. That's how his mind works, [49:29] right?" He's like, "Well, the only [49:32] reason I I can understand why I've been [49:36] given tens of billions of dollars and so [49:38] his power is God has chosen me for a [49:41] divine mission." Okay? And I think [49:44] that's true for anyone who has been so [49:48] successful that it's beyond that [49:50] person's imagination. That person needs [49:51] to reconcile that uh otherwise it [49:54] creates too much chronic dissonance. [49:56] Okay. Same thing with Donald Trump. How [49:58] do you explain? How does Donald Trump [49:59] explain like [50:02] he became president uh in 2016, [50:07] 2020 they rigged the election against [50:10] him and and um 2021 January 6 there was [50:15] a basically a coup against him, right? [50:18] Um and all these people abandoned him [50:21] and he hit rock bottom. Remember when he [50:24] went to Mara Lago the FBI raided his [50:26] place. Um there was lawfare conducted [50:29] against him. His family abandoned him. A [50:32] gun jar kusha ran away. [50:34] And that at that moment it was his point [50:39] of just greatest depression. Okay. He [50:42] may not seem it but but he was in great [50:43] despair. It seems as though the world [50:45] has abandoned him. But there were [50:47] certain individuals who did not abandon [50:48] him. They include Sean Hannity. In fact, [50:52] during this time, remember this this is [50:54] a time of Trump's uh Trump's greatest [50:57] low point. Sean Hennity was calling [50:59] every single day saying like, "Don't [51:01] worry, things will get better." Miam [51:03] Aden did not abandon him, right? Not [51:06] only Harp did not abandon him. [51:09] >> Okay, so these so what do these things [51:12] what do these what what do these people [51:14] have in common? They're all Zionists. [51:17] Okay. N are Christian Zionist. Morrison [51:20] is just a Zionist and they all believe [51:23] that Trump was put on earth put in the [51:28] White House for a special divine [51:31] mission. Then in 2024 he wins again, [51:34] right? So if you're Donald Trump and [51:37] you're a human being, the only way that [51:38] you can reconcile all that's happened to [51:40] you is God has chosen you for a special [51:45] mission and everything that that [51:46] happened before you losing the 2020 [51:49] election, January 6, this all this law [51:52] fear, it was meant to test you. It was [51:55] meant to strengthen you. It was meant to [51:56] turn you into a sword of steel for the [51:59] coming uh mission. Okay? And the coming [52:02] mission is to usher in the end times. [52:04] The end times includes the tag in North [52:06] America. It also includes um the uh war [52:10] of gamma war of gaga magog in the Middle [52:12] East. Okay, it was all meant to happen. [52:14] Again, I'm just saying as a human being, [52:16] put yourself in Trump's position, right? [52:18] How do you explain what happened? Your [52:21] only explanation is God's hand as at [52:23] work. It cannot be random. It makes no [52:26] sense. Okay. Um, it has to be God [52:31] himself that is manipulating events and [52:34] so [52:36] you must do what God commands you to do. [52:40] Okay? And this is this I think is the [52:42] best explanation for what's happening in [52:43] the Middle East. Otherwise, guys, I [52:46] can't explain any of this. Okay? If [52:48] you're like, he's just doing this to [52:49] geopolitically, it's imperial interest. [52:51] It's the MIC military industrial [52:53] complex. It's this real. I can't really [52:54] explain it. Yeah. Yeah. thought [52:57] >> to your point and I'm not arguing one [52:59] point that's a good moral law goes to a [53:01] good starting point and I agree that [53:05] only Harvest but the people that [53:08] embraced them and were were the [53:11] Christian Zionists and one of those [53:14] people that you jumped over was more [53:17] important than all of them was Charlie [53:19] Kirk and Charlie Kirk had Christianity [53:22] behind him and Charlie Kirk was a good [53:26] I'm not that I agree or whatever you [53:28] said whatever this kid was genuine. All [53:31] these other players that you're bringing [53:33] about are disingenuous. Pangi as a as an [53:37] attorney gentleman was a joke. Peter Hex [53:40] said it's a joke. I mean you see like [53:42] [snorts] [53:43] Robert so Charlie which delivered the [53:48] Christian audience to him [53:52] didn't get a good treatment. [53:54] Now, not agreeing with Baron or Candace [53:57] or Tucker or whatever all this oldest [54:01] media that's coming down, but this media [54:04] has TV USA outnumbered 20 to1. [54:08] Not only on audience, but on logic and [54:11] on reason. This whole picture of this [54:14] Tyler Robinson is not I'm not saying [54:16] Tyler Robinson could be guilty. He could [54:17] be the way that the feds are presenting, [54:19] [snorts] [54:20] but it but there's a lot of questions. [54:23] So going back to what you said which I [54:25] agree with Mara Lago the raid [54:29] using warfare against him and him being [54:32] in a tight spot. [54:34] Charlie was behind him. Look at the [54:37] treatment that Charlie got. [54:40] The next guy who wants to help him out [54:41] in a tough spot. Do you think he's gonna [54:43] he's going to jump in? [54:46] >> Um so you know I I I don't want to [54:50] comment too much on on Charter Kirk. [54:52] Okay. Um I um I mean it's very [54:54] controversial what what happened, but I [54:58] think the people around Donald Trump are [55:01] both incompetent and fanatical, which is [55:03] the most dangerous combination you could [55:05] ever have. Okay, incompetent and [55:06] fanatical. Some like Peter Haf. The [55:08] guy's clearly incompetent. Okay, but [55:10] he's also fanatical. He's a Christian [55:11] Zionist. He has all these Templar [55:13] tattoos um on his body. And um I believe [55:18] in 2019 he gave a speech in Jerusalem [55:20] saying the third temple is coming. All [55:22] right. So I I think that um it's easy [55:26] easy to dismiss the people around Trump [55:29] as [55:31] um charlatans, but I think the real [55:33] problem is they're zealots. They're [55:35] fanatics. Um and unfortunately [55:40] logic, reason, numbers do not defeat [55:44] fanatism. Okay. If you have a group of [55:47] fanatics in in place, they often get [55:50] what they want because quite honestly, [55:52] they're willing to kill and die for what [55:54] they believe in and no one else is, [55:56] right? So, so that is I think the issue [56:00] facing uh the United States. Okay. So, [56:03] that's it for my lecture. Okay. And we [56:04] have a fireside chat. Okay. So, um so so [56:07] maybe we'll break for two minutes. We [56:09] we'll get set up and then and we we'll [56:10] start. Okay. Thank you. [applause] [56:15] I I I need to use the restroom really [56:17] quickly. I [56:18] >> I I need you to use the restroom really [56:19] quickly. Yeah. All right. Thanks. Uh do [56:22] you know where the restroom is? Okay. [56:23] Thanks. [56:26] >> Just go this way. [56:28] >> Okay. [56:43] Thank you so much. [56:46] >> Thank you. [56:48] >> And we will begin a fireside chat which [56:51] will be followed by a Q&A session where [56:54] you will raise your hands and then you [56:57] will get a chance to ask questions to [57:00] professor Jang and then after all that [57:03] we will have a nice socializing session [57:06] where we'll have some food uh drinks and [57:10] so on. [57:12] Okay. [57:18] All right. Thank you, Professor Jang, [57:19] for your wonderful lecture tonight. I [57:22] want to start off by asking this [57:24] question. So, you speak out loud about a [57:30] lot of uh topics that could be very uh [57:35] uh uncomfortable with those elites. [57:38] >> Yeah. And aren't you scared of what [57:41] you're saying upsets a lot of powerful [57:43] people? So why do you speak the truth? [57:46] What compels you to speak the truth as [57:48] opposed to just living a comfortable [57:50] like quiet life? [57:51] >> Okay. So um let me first address the [57:55] issue of how dangerous it is to speak [57:57] the truth. And uh my theory and I could [58:01] be wrong, okay? I could be dead [58:02] tomorrow, but my theory is the elite [58:06] think I'm a complete Okay? [58:08] Because if you are part of the system, [58:11] if you're part of the elite, you [58:13] actually don't know what's going on [58:15] because so much has been [58:17] compartmentalized. Okay? You're just [58:18] doing what you should be doing. And no [58:21] one actually has a overall picture of [58:26] what's going on. Maybe Satan, maybe [58:28] Lucifer, okay, was really not a human [58:31] member of the um uh elite. Um, I've met [58:37] members of the Illuminati. I know [58:38] they're members of the Illuminati and [58:40] they have actually no idea what's going [58:42] on. Okay? They're just doing what they [58:44] are told to do. They're doing what [58:47] according to game theory maximizes their [58:49] benefit. And that's why we have the [58:52] system that we have today. And that [58:54] that's why it is so resilient [58:57] um and so uh powerful because each of [59:01] the individual members of this apparatus [59:04] um they're just doing what is in their [59:06] best interest and they don't really see [59:08] how they're part of these structural [59:10] forces that are determining history. [59:13] Okay. So if you talk to um someone like [59:17] Peter Theo and like you know you you [59:20] explain to him my my theories of the [59:22] techn he would just think you know I'm [59:24] well this guy's really creative that's [59:26] interesting maybe I'll do that and he [59:27] doesn't recognize that he's actually [59:29] doing this this stuff for for this [59:30] reason. Okay. So, um if so, another [59:34] thing this is imagine you're an NFL [59:37] player. Okay. You're a quarterback like [59:39] Tom Brady. If Tom Brady every day is [59:42] like what is the overall structure of [59:46] what I'm accomplishing? What's the [59:48] purpose of the NFL? [59:50] Well, that would just confuse him. You [59:52] know, his job is to go into every game [59:55] and perform to the best of of his [59:56] ability, which is to throw a ball at [59:58] someone. Okay? He's not thinking about [60:00] the overall macro structure of the game [60:03] and its purpose and whether or not it is [60:06] actually conducive to human creativity. [60:08] He doesn't care. Right? So all these [60:11] players, all the all the elite, they're [60:13] just interested in maximizing their own [60:15] personal benefit. But it means working [60:18] with the other elite in order to achieve [60:20] this uh esquetology. Okay. There are [60:23] occultists, people who practice cabala [60:26] um who want to achieve this but they [60:30] themselves [60:32] um only influencing events and they [60:34] themselves actually believe that they're [60:37] just given a message by God um and they [60:40] themselves don't even see the whole [60:42] picture. Okay. So this mac macro [60:45] analysis it is unique to what I do um [60:48] and a lot of is speculation a lot of [60:51] game theory analysis on my part. So what [60:54] would put me put me in danger okay um is [60:57] if I were to do certain things first [60:59] thing um uh the first one that would put [61:02] put me in danger is if I knew the these [61:05] members of the elite and they provided [61:07] me with extensive information evidence [61:09] that I would present to people. Okay, [61:12] then I'm a threat to them because this [61:14] evidence can be used in a court of law [61:15] or can be used by their enemies in order [61:17] to sabotage what they're doing, right? [61:19] Because the elite is not unified. [61:21] There's a lot of factions that are [61:22] fighting against each other. Okay? So, [61:23] if I had direct evidence that someone [61:26] was criminally liable for something, [61:29] then my life would be in danger. All [61:31] right, that's number one. Number two is, [61:34] let's just say one of them says to me, [61:36] "I like what you do. Here's $100 million [61:39] to do a podcast." [61:41] Well, when you take that money, it's [61:43] assumed that you will now speak on their [61:46] behalf. It's assumed that you will now [61:49] do what they tell you to do. Otherwise, [61:51] why would they give you that money? [61:52] Okay. Um, so if you were to betray them [61:55] and say, "Look, um, if you were to [61:58] betray their secrets, but you had a [62:00] contra contractual obligation with them, [62:02] then your life is also in danger." Okay? [62:06] So, um, only if you do one of these two [62:10] things would they want to kill you. [62:12] Either if you have some evidence that [62:15] would, uh, that could, uh, cause them [62:17] problems or if you betrayed them, would [62:20] they want to kill you? If you're just [62:22] doing your own YouTube channel and like [62:24] you don't know these people and you have [62:26] absolutely no daily interactions with [62:29] them, it's just easier for them to [62:31] ignore you. Okay. So, if someone like [62:34] Andrew Wilson, um, his debate with [62:36] Kenneth Owens went as badly as it could [62:39] possibly go. All right. Do you think he [62:41] went home and said, "Oh my god, I'm such [62:44] a and like I let down all my [62:47] friends." No, guys. He went home and was [62:50] highfiving all his friends saying, "What [62:53] a great job. We kicked her ass. We made [62:56] look we make we made her look like a [62:57] moron." Okay. So, people live in their [63:00] own little bubbles and as long as you [63:03] don't pop their bubble, they'll leave [63:05] you alone, right? They're not watching [63:07] my YouTube channel like, "Wow, he's got [63:09] a complete right and we should kill him [63:11] because he's speaking the truth." [63:12] They're like, "This guy's a It's [63:14] a complete joke what he's doing. Why [63:16] does he have like, you know, two million [63:18] people watching this crap and he's not [63:20] even a professor for God's sake?" Okay. [63:24] Right. So, that's just human psychology, [63:26] guys. Okay. Uh, I'm pretty confident [63:28] they don't care about me and they may [63:31] know who I am. Well, they have they have [63:32] to know who I am, but they're like, [63:33] "This guy's just making this crap up. [63:35] He's a grifter, right? The guy the guy's [63:37] a grifter. Admire the griff, but like a [63:39] complete moron." [63:41] Um, so then the question you asked is [63:43] like, "Why do I do this?" Because you're [63:45] absolutely right in that I could I could [63:47] monetize my YouTube channel. I could [63:49] take $100 million in investment and, you [63:52] know, um, create a podcast. And the [63:56] answer is um I look at my life and all [64:02] the thing all the things that that [64:03] that's happened in my life. So I grew up [64:06] in China. I was very poor when I went to [64:08] Toronto. And in Toronto for over 10 [64:11] years I was bullied. I was depressed. I [64:14] was suicidal. I worked really hard and [64:17] got into Yale. And um I was like, "Wow, [64:21] you know, like um this world is is a [64:24] great place if you work hard." So I went [64:26] to Yale and I was traumatized by the [64:28] place because I didn't fit in. Everyone [64:31] was rich. Um and they um knew they had [64:36] their own social networks and no one let [64:39] let me uh play with them. I didn't get [64:41] laid, man. If you're like, you know, a [64:44] young guy, you can't get laid. It [64:45] traumatizes you. um I didn't go to China [64:48] and I did get laid in China so that [64:51] that's why I stayed and I was working [64:53] education and it was a it was a complete [64:57] failure and um then I started this [65:01] YouTube channel and miraculously in like [65:05] I think a year I started to get a lot of [65:07] traction and now I have this global [65:10] audience. And I'm like, if I I I need I [65:13] need to explain to myself why this is [65:14] happening. And the answer is God picked [65:17] me for a special mission. How else can I [65:19] explain what happened in my life, right? [65:22] Um [65:24] um I didn't choose this path. This is a [65:27] path I got stuck with. I didn't choose [65:30] to be in China for the past 30 years [65:32] working in education. I I would I would [65:34] been perfectly happy going to law [65:35] school. I didn't get in law school, [65:36] guys. I applied three times. Never got [65:38] into law school. Okay? And then I tried [65:41] to get a job in Toronto. Didn't work [65:43] out. Okay. And then I tried to get a [65:44] girlfriend in Toronto. Never worked out. [65:46] All right. So like I wanted like like [65:48] this is not the path I chose myself. [65:50] It's a path I end up doing because every [65:53] other path was close to me. And so uh my [65:57] only explanation is this is my purpose [66:00] in life. And I knew that I I had a [66:03] purpose in life. And that's why you know [66:05] I never really sold out. I never really [66:08] uh did things for money. Um, and now, [66:11] uh, for a reason, the universe is like, [66:13] "Okay, your purpose that you've been [66:15] waiting for, you're now ready for this [66:18] mission." And quite honestly, I'm so [66:20] thankful I did not have this audience, [66:23] this reach when I was I was in my 20s [66:25] cuz I'm pretty sure I would have taken [66:27] $100 million from someone. Okay. I'm [66:29] pretty sure. I was like, "Yeah, baby. [66:31] Give it to me." Okay. Yeah. No, I'm [66:33] like, "I don't really want it. I don't [66:35] need it. I have the maturity to know [66:37] what I want in life. I [snorts] have um [66:40] a calling. I have a passion and it's to [66:42] speak the truth. And quite honestly, [66:44] this is what makes me happy. Uh this is [66:46] something I really enjoy doing. I enjoy [66:48] going on podcast and sharing my [66:50] knowledge of the world. I enjoy [66:52] teaching. I enjoy being with you guys [66:54] and um uh debating the future of [66:57] humanity. This is something that I just [66:58] enjoy doing. It's something that allows [67:00] me to sleep well at night. If I were [67:03] working as a court lawyer, I wouldn't [67:05] sleep well at night. I know because I [67:07] used to work for United Nations as an [67:09] official there in Afghanistan and I [67:10] couldn't sleep at all because I was [67:12] making six six figures. I was making a [67:14] lot of money, but the people around me [67:16] were starving. Um, and I knew it was [67:19] because I was making six figures that [67:21] they were starving. So, this is like [67:23] blood money and I I couldn't really take [67:24] it. So, I think um I have a really deep [67:28] conscious. I think that um uh I I've [67:33] been really traumatized from my life. [67:36] So, it's really made me really think [67:37] deeply about who I am, what I want um [67:41] and where I'm going in life. And now I [67:43] have this global reach. And so, I'm [67:45] like, okay, um I've been praying this [67:47] for all my life. Now, I'm I I just do [67:50] what I want to do, which is speak the [67:52] truth. And I don't really care about the [67:53] consequences. Um my my my thinking is [67:57] they don't care about me cuz I'm such a [67:58] Uh how can someone not $100 [68:01] million, right? Um but um but yeah. [68:06] Yeah. [68:06] >> Oh wow. [68:08] >> Do you are you scared that [68:11] um an intelligence I think you're [68:13] wonderful. I think you're I think that [68:15] is your purpose. But are you you are you [68:18] scared that um a Chinese intelligence or [68:23] an American intelligence agency is going [68:26] to approach you and [snorts] use you as [68:28] a mountain? [68:29] >> Yeah, that's a great question. So my [68:31] wife and I talk talk about this a lot, [68:33] right? Because it's only been 6 months [68:34] since I blew up online. Um and I've been [68:38] on Tucker Carlson. Um and my wife's and [68:42] I was like I was like I said to my wife, [68:44] you know, China doesn't really have that [68:45] much soft power and [68:49] um [68:50] China could use me in order to project [68:53] soft power. So don't you think that [68:56] there'll be a war committee within the [68:57] Chinese security apparatus trying to [69:00] figure out how to co-opt me? And my wife [69:03] said, "I love my wife and she's always [69:07] been honest with me, but but she's like, [69:09] "No, honey, because you're an [69:11] Okay, you're a pain in the ass to deal [69:14] with." These guys [69:16] are, you know, they're like, "How can [69:19] they use their position to advance their [69:21] own personal interest, right? So, if [69:24] they came to you and you were like, [69:26] "Yeah, let's go make money together." [69:27] They'd be happy to come approach you. [69:29] Uh, but if you're being an and [69:31] says, you know, like, "Get away from [69:32] me." Why would they bother, right? Why [69:35] would they pick pick such a hard path [69:38] guys? Um like so you know these people [69:40] who are in security services, they're [69:41] human beings as well. They want a good [69:44] easy life. They don't want problems for [69:46] themselves. And so they approach me and [69:48] they know I can't really be bought. I [69:50] don't really have any sins. I don't have [69:52] any vices. It's too much of a pain in [69:54] the ass, right? Usually it's people who [69:57] volunteer the services to intelligence, [70:01] right? Because there's there lot lot of [70:03] business people who are like, you know, [70:04] like how do I move up in life? Well, I [70:06] need to go work with the Chinese state. [70:08] So they find friends who find friends [70:10] who help them get connected to the [70:12] Chinese intelligence service and uh the [70:15] Chinese intelligence service gives them [70:16] security protection in order to conduct [70:18] their business overseas. Right? That's [70:21] how how these things work. There's no [70:23] one in who works for the CIA or the [70:27] Ministry of State Security, which is a [70:28] Chinese CIA, who is like, you know, [70:30] like, how do I do a great job for my [70:32] nation? Okay, I'm sorry to say this, but [70:34] there's really no one who who is like [70:36] that. Everyone's like, how do I use my [70:38] position and power to make as much money [70:41] as possible for myself while doing as [70:43] little work as possible? [70:47] >> Uh, yes. [70:48] >> Um, I kind of have a followup to Gent's [70:51] question. um which you know in terms of [70:54] um because it sounds like from your [70:56] lectures that the collapse of [70:58] civilization is inevitable [71:01] um and at the same breath um I would [71:04] like to think that you're doing this [71:06] because you feel like something about it [71:08] could be changed. I want to know if my [71:10] interpretation of perhaps maybe you [71:13] think like the world go and the dog like [71:15] things like that aren't so far in stone [71:19] and I know in your recent podcast you [71:21] also spoke about that nuclear war won't [71:23] happen in your lifetime. So is is part [71:26] of your mission also trying to change [71:28] some of your predictions or do you think [71:30] that like like what what part of your [71:33] prediction do you think is inevitable [71:34] and what part is changeable? So, um, you [71:38] know, Jesus said it best. The kingdom of [71:40] heaven is coming. Repent. Okay, that's [71:43] my message to everyone. When I make [71:45] these predictions, I'm not saying these [71:47] are things that I want to happen or I [71:50] think will happen. I'm saying these are [71:51] things that are going to happen [71:52] regardless of what we do. All right? It [71:54] doesn't really impact u the grand scheme [71:58] of things. The elite is going to do what [72:00] the elite is going to do. It doesn't [72:01] matter [72:03] if I make these predictions. So, [72:05] remember I made the Iran prediction two [72:08] years ago and in um June 20 uh June last [72:14] year, June 2025, uh Israel launched a [72:17] 12-day war and Trump um bombed um um [72:22] these Iranian nuclear facilities. And [72:24] that's when I blew up. That's when [72:25] everyone everyone was watching my video, [72:28] right? In my video, I was very very [72:29] clear. If the United States attacks [72:33] Iran, the United States will lose. Iran [72:35] will close out the moves and threaten [72:38] the global economy and United States [72:41] sending ground troops. United States [72:43] will face another Vietnam. [72:45] I was very very clear about this. Okay, [72:48] I know for a fact that Trump watched my [72:50] video. Why? Because um you know how in [72:54] my Iran Trump video, I went on for like [72:57] 10 minutes pretending to be Trump and [72:58] giving a speech as to why we need to go [73:00] and attack Iran, right? For democracy, [73:03] for economic prosperity, because Iran uh [73:07] was a nuclear weapon. Okay, I listed all [73:09] these reasons. And what's really funny [73:11] is when Trump attacked Iran in in [73:14] February 20 uh February 28th, he did not [73:17] give a speech. And my wife said to me [73:20] was because he watched your speech. And [73:22] he was like, "Whatever thing he says, if [73:24] he gives a speech, it's going to sound [73:25] too much like my speech and it would [73:27] come across looking like a complete [73:28] moron." Okay? And that's why he didn't [73:30] give a speech. Okay? I I don't know if [73:31] that's true or not. Okay? But I think he [73:33] did watch my my video. And so I lay out [73:36] very clearly what not to do and they [73:39] like, "Let's go do it, guys." Okay, so [73:42] my videos have actually maybe they're [73:44] good at analyzing events, but they have [73:46] abely no impact in influencing real [73:50] events because the elite are going to do [73:53] what the elite are going to do in order [73:55] to maintain and promote their best [73:58] interests. Okay? So why I'm doing what [74:02] I'm doing is to reach people like [74:05] yourselves who for the reason have [74:09] questioned the official narrative and [74:11] who are looking for answers and that I [74:16] think is my real impact. So again as [74:19] Jesus says the the kingdom of heaven is [74:21] coming repent civilization is falling [74:25] but if during a fall civilization you're [74:29] able to activate your divine spark if [74:33] you're able to recognize the truth of [74:36] the universe and find individual [74:38] happiness and share with other people [74:40] then I think that uh that's what matters [74:43] and the false civilization doesn't [74:46] really matter because a false [74:47] civilization just means Oh, we cannot [74:49] fly first class Maldes and drink [74:52] Chardonnay and have oysters and uh you [74:57] know uh have avocado from Mexico. Those [75:00] things don't matter. What things the [75:02] thing that that does matter is your [75:05] intimate connection with the divine as [75:07] well as the people around you. [75:10] Okay. Uh sorry but but but let's [75:12] continue the the fire set and and then [75:13] we'll open up the question. Okay. [75:15] >> Yeah. And speaking the truth is your way [75:18] to connect to the divine. [75:20] >> Yes, that's right. [75:21] >> Okay. [75:21] >> Yeah. [75:22] >> Yeah. Um, Professor J's message usually [75:25] are very dark, but we have this all [75:28] right. All right. All right. Sign right [75:29] there. So, I think that's the uh message [75:32] from the universe saying that it's going [75:33] to be all right. [75:35] >> As long as you're in Austin, Texas. [75:37] >> Yeah. Especially Austin, Texas. Yeah. [75:39] You guys have picked a good good [75:41] location to be in. Yes. Yes. [75:43] >> All right. Yeah. So one more question [75:45] about the way [75:48] you do things. Um so in previous videos [75:51] you mentioned that uh the reason for you [75:54] being a high school teacher [75:56] uh as opposed to being a university [75:58] professor uh is that you value [76:01] intellectual freedom. [76:02] >> Yeah. [76:03] >> So I wonder what does freedom mean to [76:05] you? Uh why what does freedom matter? [76:10] >> Yeah. So freedom to me is very simple. [76:12] It's just uh the ability to speak [76:16] whatever I want to speak that matters to [76:18] me. Okay. I think words really do [76:21] matter. When you speak something, it [76:24] does impact reality itself. And that's [76:27] why I don't lie. I mean, maybe I'll [76:30] choose to remain silent, but I refuse to [76:31] lie because when you lie, you corrupt [76:34] the universe and you corrupt yourself as [76:36] well, right? The um Zoroastrians really [76:39] believe this. Live the truth. uh defy [76:42] the lie. Okay. Don't live the don't live [76:45] um the the lie. So I think um words [76:50] really do matter. Um yeah. [76:55] >> Yeah. [76:55] >> Okay. So so sorry. Could you repeat the [76:57] question? I I I I I got lost. Yeah. [76:59] >> Oh yeah. [77:01] >> Yeah. [77:01] >> Yeah. The question was simple. Um what [77:03] does freedom mean to you? [77:04] >> Okay. Right. Sorry. Yeah. So I found [77:08] that at Yale I could not speak what I [77:11] wanted to speak. Why? Because you had to [77:12] write papers, right? You had to do [77:14] examinations. And the professor uh could [77:17] determine whether or not you passed the [77:20] class, but the professor could also [77:22] determine you if you you went to [77:23] graduate school. And then when you went [77:25] when you go to graduate school, the [77:26] professor could determine if you got a [77:28] job afterwards and if the and could [77:31] determine whether or not you could [77:32] publish, whether you could rise. Okay? [77:35] Okay. So you can imagine it's a very [77:36] feudal system and you have to conform to [77:38] expectations of your mentor the [77:42] professor. Okay. And then I was like I [77:44] don't want to partake in the system [77:46] because like I want to know what the [77:47] truth is. And these professors are [77:49] really smart people. They're really nice [77:50] people. I really get along with them but [77:53] they have no real real world real world [77:55] experience and they live in a world of [77:56] books. Okay. So then I became a [77:58] journalist thinking like oh through [78:00] journalism I can now speak the truth. [78:03] No. Okay? Because when you do [78:06] journalism, you have editors. Your [78:07] editors select what assignments you uh [78:10] you can take on and also how you write [78:14] the um the essay. So um I became very [78:18] frustrated uh with the established [78:22] hierarchy in the world whether it's [78:24] academia or publishing or journalism. [78:27] And I was like, I want to speak the [78:31] truth as I know it, as I believe it. [78:34] That's why I chose to work in China as a [78:37] high school teacher because quite [78:39] honestly, the Chinese don't know what [78:42] you're doing. Okay? They don't really [78:44] care. And uh it's in English, so it's [78:48] not really relevant to their society. [78:50] And the kids are stupid. So like they [78:52] believe whatever you say, right? So, I [78:55] picked China because it is so [78:57] dysfunctional. Okay? And like being [78:59] dysfunctional means, hey, no one can [79:01] tell me uh you shouldn't really teach [79:04] kids about this sort of stuff, right? [79:06] You really shouldn't teach kids about [79:08] secret societies and esquetology and [79:12] cabala. Okay. No one in China, like no [79:15] one in China would do this. And so I was [79:17] operating in a gray zone. So, so, so [79:19] that's why I chose to work in China as a [79:21] high school teacher. [snorts] [79:22] >> Okay. [79:23] >> Yeah. If if I were at Harvard being [79:26] professor, I guarantee you I'd be a very [79:27] different person. [79:28] >> In a bad way. [79:30] >> Uh in a very bad way. Yeah. Yeah. [79:32] >> Okay. Yeah. So, let me ask you about [79:34] education. I myself was a teacher for a [79:38] couple of years after university. [79:41] So, um what does an ideal school look [79:45] like to you? I know you're you have been [79:48] educator. [79:49] >> Yeah. Um so for in order to raise uh [79:53] kids for the future that we have uh [79:56] discussed that you lectured about yeah [79:59] how would you prepare kids and if you [80:02] have a school of your own what does it [80:05] look like? Okay. So, imagine every day [80:09] uh the adults, the parents are together [80:12] and we're discussing their cult. We're [80:15] discussing geopolitics. We're discussing [80:18] whatever it takes to understand what's [80:20] going on. We as adults are in a [80:25] passionate pursuit of the truth and [80:28] meaning in life. Okay? And the kids are [80:31] just running around by themselves [80:33] playing uh doing what they what they [80:37] want. Not on the iPad, okay? But like [80:39] you know maybe you know swimming or [80:41] whatever. Okay. That to me would be the [80:44] ideal school because that is is [80:48] environment in which kids learn the [80:50] most, right? Because as adults we're [80:53] role models for for kids. They're going [80:55] to pick up our habits of mind and work. [80:58] And if we as adults are first and [81:00] foremost focused on pursuing the truth, [81:03] they themselves will will will do so. [81:07] But they they need to want to do it um [81:13] when they're ready. [81:15] And so but but when they're ready [81:18] uh their capacity to learn is just [81:20] incredible. Okay. When they're really [81:22] motivated and they really want to learn, [81:23] they learn so fast. So uh the problem [81:27] with our school system is first of all [81:29] it's a cookie cutter system that treats [81:33] um uh children as products to be [81:36] manufactured on an assembly line. They [81:37] want every kid to be the same and if [81:39] you're not the same then you are then [81:42] you should be on adero or or whatever. [81:44] Okay. But but but you're clearly a a [81:45] problem. You clearly have psychological [81:47] issues. Um the school [81:50] um destroys children's innate capacity [81:54] to learn. Okay. Um children love [81:58] learning. They might not like learning [82:00] calculus but they like learning how the [82:03] world works. They like learning how we [82:05] think. They like uh learning real [82:07] skills. Okay. Um, and the third thing [82:11] that that's really annoying about [82:12] schools is it uh indoctrinates children [82:16] into a very materialistic worldview, [82:19] right? So, it teaches evolution. It [82:21] teaches um the big bang, but it doesn't [82:23] teach the occult. It doesn't teach [82:25] spirituality. It doesn't teach [82:26] consciousness. [82:28] And um but you know, children are divine [82:32] consciousness. They are the most [82:34] intimately connected with the source [82:36] with the monad. So the point of school [82:39] is to almost labotmize children. Okay? [82:42] It is almost to [82:45] um um destroy the connection with the [82:49] truth with the intimate with with the [82:51] source. And that's why there's so much [82:54] psych psychological anxiety in schools [82:56] today. And that's why children are so [82:58] over overly medicated because they know [83:00] they're being lied to. They know they're [83:02] they're being tortured. Um and that's [83:06] why the children who perform the best um [83:12] are themselves psychologically scarred. [83:15] So I mean I know many people who went to [83:18] the Ivy League and they're not happy [83:21] people. Um in fact I would say they are [83:24] some of the most depressed people you [83:25] will you'll ever meet. And so I think [83:28] that um what what I would like to see [83:32] happen um is [83:36] um you know if you're a parent you [83:39] prioritize your children and you help [83:42] your children seek his or her own truth [83:44] and and that's what I think a school [83:45] should be about. [83:47] >> Could you please give us like a very [83:49] rough map of how a school would look [83:53] like the ideal school? [83:55] Well, I mean, imagine like a a campus, [83:58] right? And it's the adults, the teachers [84:01] who are learning and the children are [84:04] learning beside the adults, [84:07] right? Does that make sense? It's not a [84:09] structured learning environment. You [84:11] don't go to class, but the teachers are [84:13] working on projects and the students are [84:15] apprentice [84:17] on these projects, [84:20] right? Um, so let so so so let's sort of [84:24] visualize. Okay, imagine a school that [84:27] is first and foremost a self-sufficient [84:29] community. It could be a ranch, it could [84:31] be a farm, but the adults are are [84:33] getting up at like 4:00 in the morning, [84:36] you know, feeding the pigs, milking the [84:38] cows, giving birth, um, helping goats [84:42] give give birth, and the kids are there [84:45] doing this. Okay. So they have they have [84:47] an inconnection with nature uh and with [84:50] community and education is first and [84:53] foremost about um helping the [84:56] self-sufficient community be much more [84:58] resilient, be much more uh prosperous. [85:01] So it means learning you know game [85:03] theory and geopolitics but it also means [85:06] learning the occult because you know [85:09] when you actually deal with nature you [85:11] know when you actually um deal with a [85:14] horse or you talk to a plant you're [85:16] actually amazed by how vibrant and alive [85:20] everything is okay there is a [85:21] consciousness within that horse okay [85:24] pole players know this and I'm sure you [85:26] guys ride horses but horse can read your [85:28] mind have you ever asked yourself how [85:30] horses can do that. And if you talk to [85:32] plants, plants do respond. So, so, so I [85:36] think that the like you have you you [85:38] have to be out in nature and the people [85:40] have to be work working together in [85:43] order to create a better life for [85:44] themselves and and for nature and that [85:46] that's a very basis for education. [85:51] >> Okay. [85:51] >> Okay. [85:52] >> Let me ask you about American society. [85:58] In America, Gen Z will be the last [86:00] generation with the white majority. [86:04] The white population will no longer be [86:06] the majority by 2045. [86:09] So, [86:11] and with regards to this fact, I also uh [86:16] captured something from your previous [86:18] conversation where uh it happened about [86:21] a couple of months ago on YouTube. you [86:24] mentioned that uh Canada is a pretty [86:27] racist country and that if you're an [86:30] immigrant uh you will never be accepted [86:32] as one of them even if you're like a [86:34] doctoral lawyer. So what do you make of [86:37] that? Um like I know this going to sound [86:42] very strange but immigration is usually [86:45] not a good thing. All right. So I [86:48] understand yes you want the best and [86:50] brightest to come to your country and [86:53] you want to give refuge to um those who [86:56] are most desperate and you know I'm [86:58] thankful for Canada uh for letting my [87:02] family immigrate to Canada because back [87:04] in China we were very very poor. Um but [87:07] I don't really understand the concept of [87:10] immigration because when you're born [87:14] you're born into community and this [87:16] community gives you purpose, structure [87:19] and meaning. You want to do better. You [87:22] want to work hard to build a stronger [87:25] community. This community itself wants [87:27] to be cohesive and wants to um uh you [87:32] know be be vibrant. But if you create a [87:34] situation where the breast and brothers [87:36] can just leave a community and go [87:37] somewhere else, [87:39] this doesn't really make much sense, [87:43] right? So like look at the western world [87:46] for the past 50 years has been extremely [87:50] prosperous [87:51] and [87:53] um just paradise for a lot of people, [87:56] especially if you're white and middle [87:57] class. But have you asked yourself why [88:02] how this could happen? How is is it [88:04] possible for the United States uh [88:06] Europe, Canada to be so prosperous? And [88:09] the answer is because the third world is [88:13] such holes. Okay. Um the reality is [88:17] that a place like Canada makes a lot of [88:20] money through money laundering. Its [88:22] banks are essentially um um they [88:26] basically just engage in money money [88:27] laundering. So, if you're a a corrupt [88:31] dictator in Africa, well, you send your [88:33] children and your money to Canada to be [88:37] washed. Um, and your children can buy [88:41] great houses and get and go to great [88:43] schools. But if Canada did not do this, [88:47] there would be no corruption in Africa, [88:49] right? If you think about it, why why is [88:51] there corruption in Africa? is I know as [88:53] a dictator I could steal this money and [88:56] then transfer it to Canada, city of [88:58] London, Washington, who cares for [89:00] safekeeping. If these places did not [89:02] exist and I was corrupt, first of all, I [89:05] would have no place to put my money, but [89:06] I'm pretty sure that people could come [89:08] and kill me. Now, who cares because I I [89:10] can always get on on a plane and fly off [89:12] somewhere else and enjoy my winnings in [89:15] Dubai or Hong Kong or Singapore. Okay. [89:19] So the fact that you have transnational [89:21] capital, it allows for the destruction [89:24] of communities around the world, [89:27] especially in the third world, South [89:29] America, East Asia, [89:32] India, um Africa, these places. Okay. So [89:37] um immigration is part and parcel of the [89:40] free flow of capital of transnational [89:42] capitalism. So, um I think [89:48] that immigration [89:51] um ultimately destroys communities and I [89:55] think that um I mean um I mean I'm sure [90:01] there are really strong arguments for [90:03] immigration and people will call me a [90:04] hypocrite because I benefit from from [90:06] immigration but I think um logically [90:09] speaking objectively speaking I think [90:10] that immigration has been a ne negative [90:13] for most societies especially those [90:15] societies in uh the third world in the [90:18] developing nations. [90:21] >> Okay. Let me ask you one more question [90:23] and then we can move on to the Q&A [90:26] session. [90:26] >> Right. [90:27] >> Uh about meritocracy. [90:29] >> Yeah. [90:30] >> You have nuanced views on meritocracy [90:34] and so let me play the devil's advocate. [90:37] Um is to your view is it wrong to [90:42] strive for greatness? Is it wrong to [90:45] dedicate oneself to achievements? [90:48] >> Okay, so these are two two different [90:50] things. Okay, you're talking about the [90:51] meritocracy, you're talking about [90:54] striving for greatness, right? These two [90:56] things are actually not [90:58] aligned. Okay, so the meritocracy is [91:01] really about gatekeeping. It's really [91:03] about who wins and who loses in society. [91:06] Basically, if you are able to go to Yale [91:08] or Harvard, you win. If you don't, then [91:11] you then you lose. Okay? But striving [91:13] for greatness is a different thing. [91:15] Striving for greatness is something that [91:16] is innate in most of us. And we should [91:20] be allowed to strive for greatness [91:21] regardless of our social demographic [91:23] background. The reality is if you go to [91:25] a place like Yale and Harvard, it was [91:28] already destined from [91:31] uh the moment they're born whether or [91:34] not they will go to this to this place. [91:36] The the wealth inequality at a place [91:38] like Y and Harvard is just obscene, [91:40] especially today. Um I got very lucky [91:43] and I got into Yale, but I am not [91:45] representative in any way of the [91:47] demographic who goes to Yale and [91:49] Harvard. It is primarily uh people who [91:53] are born very rich and who are born in [91:57] certain cities like New York, San [91:58] Francisco, LA and who are able to access [92:02] the best kindergartens uh the best um [92:05] private schools and who have a certain [92:08] social cache to them. They have a [92:10] certain way of speaking. They have a [92:11] certain way of look looking at the [92:13] world. Okay. So Yale and Harvard it's [92:15] not a meritocracy. It's not about [92:17] finding the best and brightest and [92:18] allowing to suffer greatness. It's a [92:20] self-replicating machine that rewards a [92:23] certain outlook and a certain um [92:26] worldview. Um if you are white and [92:30] brilliant and you're from Tennessee, [92:32] guess what? You're not getting to Yale. [92:33] Okay. All right. Sorry, you're [92:37] brilliant, but hey, you're you're white [92:38] and you're from Tennessee, right? So, I [92:41] don't think the meritocracy is a fair [92:44] and an and open place. I think it is a [92:47] very uh regimented place that gatekeeps [92:50] and rewards a certain type of of of of [92:53] person striving for greatness. If you [92:55] really want people to strive for [92:56] greatness, you would actually burn down [92:58] the meritocracy, right? Did Abraham [93:01] Lincoln go to Yale? No. Did George [93:03] Washington go to Yale? No. In fact, if [93:06] you look at some of the most brilliant [93:09] uh people in America today, um who went [93:14] to Yale in Harvard? Can someone name [93:16] name someone that you think you know [93:18] that you listen to um you read and you [93:22] listen to and he or she went to Yale and [93:25] Harvard? There are a lot of politicians [93:27] who went to Yale and Harvard, especially [93:28] Yale Law School, Harvard Law School. [93:30] There are a lot of powerful people who [93:32] went to Yale and Harvard. But if you're [93:34] talking like just a brilliant [93:35] intellectual, [93:37] um I don't think Yon Harvard produces [93:39] brilliant intellectuals. I just don't [93:41] think so. I um I'm an accident of [93:44] history, right? Uh but but yeah, no, I [93:47] mean um I mean there are lots of people [93:50] I I listen to and I think they're [93:51] brilliant. I was on Theo Vaughn uh show [93:54] in Los Angeles two weeks ago and I think [93:57] he's a really smart guy. He comes across [94:00] as bumbling and stupid, but you actually [94:03] talk to him, you have a conversation [94:04] with him, he gets a lot of things. [94:06] Whereas I have lots of friends who own [94:09] Harvard and like it is impossible to [94:11] talk to them about certain issues, [94:13] right? If you're talking about about [94:15] Trump, you say, "Well, you know, this [94:17] guy has a medicine complex," they don't [94:19] get it. They're like, "No, the guy's a [94:20] moron." Okay? I I think that people who [94:23] went to the most elite schools tend to [94:24] see things in the most simplistic terms. [94:27] Uh whereas I think that people like you [94:30] know who didn't go to the be very best [94:31] schools uh people like Joe Rogan uh who [94:34] are self-taught they're the most [94:36] open-minded and there and they're the [94:37] most curious and there and therefore [94:39] they are I think the most intellectual. [94:41] Um so so these two things are not the [94:44] same thing. Okay. The meritocracy and [94:46] starting for greatness. [94:47] >> Okay. [94:48] >> Okay. [94:49] >> Okay. Thank you so much. [94:50] >> Okay. So so so we'll open up to [94:52] questions and maybe pass the microphone [94:54] around so so we we can get get you. [94:56] Okay. Great. Thank Thank you so much. [94:57] Yes. Okay. So, we we'll open up to [94:59] questions. So, you're going to ask for [95:00] anything. Okay. [95:01] >> Uh [snorts] maybe you can help me pick [95:04] uh you know. Yeah. [95:06] >> Okay. [95:06] >> Okay. All right. [95:08] >> So, you're saying that you know money is [95:10] AI is going to take over money and we [95:11] know money is the motivator in [95:13] capitalism. Capitalism for work, for [95:15] energy. How is AI going to incentivize [95:17] people to go to work, do jobs, things [95:20] like that? What is your take on that? [95:22] >> Right. So the system that they want to [95:24] create we can refer to as techno [95:26] Marxism. Okay. So think of Marxism but [95:29] which has w with a lot of technology to [95:31] control it. And if you think about it [95:35] um the Chinese and the Soviets [95:39] worked really hard. There was no money [95:42] but they worked really really hard. So [95:43] what motivated them? What motivated them [95:45] was an esotical vision that if we work [95:48] hard for the next 20 years we're going [95:50] to achieve paradise. Right. And and also [95:53] just propaganda just uh and also the [95:56] fact that their nations were destroyed. [95:58] So Soviet Union was destroyed in World [95:59] War II. China was destroyed in a civil [96:02] war and a sense of humiliation. Okay. So [96:05] and know so like imagine a scenario [96:07] where United States has a civil war and [96:10] like most of the country is burned out [96:12] and people are desperate and they want [96:15] to believe in a higher good and so [96:21] um these technology companies create [96:23] this AI god and convince people like if [96:26] we just work hard for the next 20 years [96:29] not not only can we rebuild America but [96:31] we'll achieve paradise. We'll never have [96:33] to work hard again because AI will then [96:36] build robots that will allow us to live [96:39] in leisure. Right? This is [96:40] technomarcism. That's what a car marks [96:42] taught us, right? We'll work hard for 20 [96:44] years and then we'll achieve utopia. [96:47] >> So part of that mission is essentially [96:48] burning down a marathon to rebuild. [96:50] >> It's required. Yes. Yes. Yes. Because [96:53] otherwise people aren't going to buy [96:55] this. Right. Right. So you look at [96:57] something like the metaverse, right? [96:59] Right? Metaverse is a very important [97:00] part of this grand esquetology, but [97:03] people aren't going to go on the [97:05] metaverse cuz it's complete crap. Right. [97:09] So, so what you do is you burn it down [97:10] and you don't give people the option. [97:13] All right. [97:14] >> Yes. [97:15] >> Uh can we pass some mic over here? [97:17] >> Okay. [97:18] >> Professor Yang, thank you for touring. [97:20] >> Yeah. [97:20] >> Gives us a chance to see you and talk to [97:22] you. Um so you talk about how the [97:25] western hemisphere United States still [97:28] better off than the rest of the world in [97:30] the coming collapse. And also you said [97:32] within United States you said you [97:34] mentioned Texas and what else what else [97:37] can we do to with you know to face this [97:42] collapse and what else can we do? You [97:44] talk about connection with God, family, [97:47] you know um building relationships. What [97:50] else can we do? [97:53] Um right so I think that what's going to [97:56] happen is we are moving towards the age [97:59] of profits okay so maybe for the past 40 [98:01] years we lived in the age of [98:03] entrepreneurs people like Steve Jobs [98:05] right um well in the coming age of a [98:10] prophet someone like Steve Jobs would [98:11] not be an entrepreneur he would become a [98:14] prophet uh he would be someone who tries [98:17] to galvanize a community who who tries [98:19] to speak certain truths that uh attract [98:22] a lot of people and he would try to [98:24] build communities. Uh so I think that is [98:27] the future. Rather than focus on making [98:28] as much money as possible, focus on [98:31] trying to create a strong community as [98:33] possible that is resilient, that is [98:35] open, that is vibrant. That's something [98:37] that I'm I'm working on right now. In [98:39] fact, um I joke about this, but I'm not [98:41] really joking, but I want to build a [98:42] university for profits, right? You know [98:45] how there are universities for [98:46] entrepreneurs? I want to build a [98:48] university for profits. So they come and [98:50] they learn about their code. They come [98:51] and learn about the great books about [98:53] game theory and then they become [98:55] energized to go around the world and [98:57] start their own communities, right? Yep. [99:02] Uh can we pass can we pass the mic [99:04] around please? [99:04] >> Yes. [99:05] >> Um okay. Yeah. Yeah. So [99:08] >> [snorts] [99:08] >> um at one point in one of your lectures [99:10] I recall that you had mentioned the [99:14] currency of attention in a sense uh as [99:16] opposed to necessarily just the currency [99:18] of AI. I think of this as quite [99:20] interesting relative to money to AI. AI [99:24] necessitates attention of the person [99:26] whether it's via neural link or at the [99:28] moment with chat GPT like you've [99:29] mentioned tonight. Um I'm very curious [99:34] with respect to that how you see the [99:36] current landscape of attention uh [99:39] especially considering Tik Tok and [99:41] Instagram and all these other uh [99:43] mechanisms for essentially stealing [99:46] attention for very long periods of time [99:48] and optimizing to do so. [99:51] So I think uh social media especially [99:54] Facebook, Instagram, Tik Tok are the [99:56] worst things to ever happen to the [99:58] world. Uh because what they do that was [100:02] not possible before was they monopolized [100:05] your attention. Okay. So so before you [100:09] had uh film, right? And film was u you [100:14] know movies, cinema and that marked a [100:17] revolutionary concept in in human [100:19] affairs. But the the thing is that you [100:22] can only go watch a movie for like two [100:25] hours at most. And back then it was [100:27] maybe like an hour, right? And so it was [100:30] a form of escapism. [100:32] With social media, you can be on the [100:35] thing every waking hour. And then your [100:38] attention is monopolized. And why this [100:42] is important is your humanity [100:45] derives from your attention. Okay? From [100:48] your consciousness. So if you were just [100:50] left alone and you just walked in the [100:53] park for eight hours, what would happen [100:54] is your mind would roam the universe, [100:58] right? You would come up like you would [100:59] have ideas, you would be inspired um and [101:03] you would come up with a better [101:04] understanding of the universe and you [101:06] would have a stronger connection with [101:08] the monad. I'm not sure if you guys do [101:09] this, but if you walk for eight hours a [101:10] day, sorry, if you walked just for two [101:12] hours a day for your entire life, you'd [101:14] be a much more creative person than if [101:17] you spent two hours on social media. [101:19] That's pretty obvious, right? So, social [101:22] media has cheapened what it means to be [101:24] human and it's derived people's capacity [101:27] to be human, especially young children. [101:29] Why is it that we have this overwhelming [101:32] social science research that says that [101:34] social media is really bad for kids, [101:36] guys? Okay. It causes girls to be more [101:39] depressed. It causes them to be [101:40] suicidal. Uh it destroys their attention [101:43] span. But we do nothing about it. Why? [101:46] Because it's so profitable to control [101:48] people's uh attention. So u attention is [101:52] the source of wealth. Because attention [101:55] uh is really our divine connection to uh [102:00] the universal consciousness. [102:02] And um so social media is the worst [102:05] thing that that that could happen to us. [102:06] And the greatest action we've done that [102:08] we could have is to reclaim our [102:10] attention to get off social media and go [102:13] for long walks in the park to read a [102:15] book to talk to a friend to have [102:17] conversations like this. Okay. So the [102:20] greatest act of you can have is to say [102:22] I'm a human person. I have control over [102:25] my conscious consciousness. I'm a divine [102:27] being that has connection to God. And if [102:30] I just focus on meditating, if I just [102:33] focus on learning, then my consciousness [102:37] expands throughout the universe. I [102:38] become a better person because of it. [102:41] >> Okay. [102:43] >> So, what are your Oh, sorry. [102:45] >> Yeah. Go ahead. Um, what are your [102:46] thoughts on obviously AI is reshaping [102:50] psychology, just how people think, even [102:52] the language that we speak. It's [102:55] specifically when we get into paid [102:56] programs shifting our relationship to [102:59] fiat currency because everything is [103:01] tokenized and people don't typically [103:03] understand the companies keep it very uh [103:05] kind of cloak and dagger how much like [103:08] how much compute equals $1 and so people [103:12] are starting to spend more and more [103:14] money to get this kind of uh different [103:17] level of compute. What do you think that [103:19] does to our psychology about how we [103:21] relate to fiat currency and then the [103:23] overall picture of what's happening? [103:26] >> Yeah, that's a great question. Okay, so [103:28] um let me rephrase a question. Okay, so [103:30] what does digital currency mean for [103:33] understanding of ourselves of [103:35] relationship with money and uh with with [103:38] the greater world? Uh that's that's a [103:40] great idea because remember the power [103:43] means capturing your attention and when [103:46] money is a physical object [103:49] um your connection is with the money. [103:52] Okay. But now that uh currency is uh [103:57] just a digit then your connection is not [103:59] with the money but with the with your [104:02] iPhone basically right and that's a very [104:04] different relationship because what the [104:07] iPhone can do is basically absorb your [104:10] attention and control your attention. [104:14] Right? Think about what your iPhone is [104:16] doing all the time. It's tracking where [104:18] you move and it's tracking what you do [104:21] online. It's tracking who you [104:23] communicate with. Okay. So, it's trying [104:24] to create a personal profile of who you [104:27] are. Okay. So, the money it's just a [104:31] means of exchange. But, but if you use [104:34] digital currency, if you use um iPhone, [104:38] uh Apple Pay, then what you're doing is [104:41] you're almost um counterfeiting your [104:45] identity onto the phone and that causes [104:48] you to become reliant on this [104:49] technology. if that makes any sense. [104:52] >> I'm also meaning things like chat GPT. [104:54] So, it's uh maybe or or clawed. So, it's [104:57] $100 and it'll do this many things and [105:00] there's not an actual gauge to know what [105:03] you're getting for that $100, how many [105:05] questions it's going to answer, what it [105:06] will do. And then the programs change [105:10] and it feels to me like it's eroding our [105:13] understanding of like right now we can [105:16] say well it's you know a dollar for this [105:18] bottle of water but we're starting to [105:21] phase away from being able to relate [105:22] that to AI compute. [105:24] >> Yeah. Um so what people don't appreciate [105:28] is these um [105:30] um large language models what they're [105:33] doing is not trying to give you [105:35] information. What they're trying to do [105:36] is trying to figure out your mentality [105:38] so they can customize information in a [105:40] way that um convince you, that persuades [105:43] you. Okay. It's really trying to [105:45] counterfeit how your mind works and it's [105:47] been very effective in in that regard. [105:49] Um Yep. Okay. Uh can we pass the mic [105:53] around? Yeah. [105:54] >> So I I thank you very much for coming. I [105:57] really appreciate the conversation. Can [105:59] you kind of enumerate your thought [106:02] process when it comes to the elite and [106:04] their seems like they have this occult [106:08] uh version of how they approach their [106:11] their minations because the occult seems [106:14] to be very interesting and it's sort of [106:15] a disconnect or maybe it's a part of the [106:17] spectrum of the relationship with the [106:19] divine or their at least their version [106:21] of it. [106:23] >> Okay. So, could you rephrase the [106:25] question in in a much more simple uh [106:28] >> can you go down to the occult? Kind of [106:30] explain your thoughts on the occult and [106:31] how it relates to the elite. [106:36] >> Right. So, the occult is trying to [106:40] explain how the universe works. It's [106:42] trying to explain the soul of the [106:44] universe because something that all [106:46] cultists understand is the universe is [106:49] mind which creates matter. Okay? Right? [106:52] And this goes against our intuition or [106:54] what we're taught in school which is [106:55] that matter creates mind. They call us [106:56] to understand that's mind that creates [106:58] matter. [107:00] Okay. Um so why doesn't so why we taught [107:04] that matter controls mind? And it's [107:08] because the occultist, the secret [107:09] societies appreciate that. Um, if mind [107:14] is what matters, then the way that you [107:18] have power is by controlling people's [107:21] minds. And you do that by giving them a [107:24] focus on matter. Okay? So the secret [107:27] societies focus on the uh occult on the [107:31] universe as mental because that's what [107:34] allows them to access truth. that allows [107:36] them to predict events. That allows them [107:38] to control events. But in order for them [107:40] to extract labor from us, in order for [107:43] them to [107:46] um extract energy from us, they need us [107:49] to believe the inverse, right? They need [107:53] us to focus on the here and now, on [107:56] matter, on money, right? So the the [107:59] occult uses money as a mechanism in [108:02] order to extract energy, consciousness [108:04] and attention from you so that they can [108:08] be so that they can be the elite. Right? [108:10] Uh and this is the same pattern from all [108:14] societies across all of time. Okay. The [108:19] every culture practices this where the [108:22] elite understands the cult and they [108:24] worship edit dieties in order to expand [108:27] their influence and power and they [108:29] enslave everyone else by convincing the [108:32] people that the world is fundamentally [108:34] materialistic. There is no god and that [108:37] when we die we just die. [108:40] Okay. [108:42] >> Uh professor um first of all I agree [108:44] with you. I think Texas is going to be [108:46] sort of the new um epicenter of uh sort [108:49] of like a new free world in America. [108:52] I was just curious along those lines um [108:55] I feel like we need a whole bunch of [108:56] decentralized [108:58] uh you know new power structures to [109:00] arise among the people and I wonder if [109:03] you've heard of Cordal which is a new [109:04] internet that's up and coming. Uh some [109:07] gentlemen are building a decentralized [109:09] mesh mesh network excuse me and uh I [109:12] believe it's kind of the future. People [109:14] can put their content on there and get [109:16] paid in this cryptocurrency that comes [109:18] with the new internet [109:21] basically at their leisure whenever [109:24] anybody can send them cryptocurrency on [109:26] cordal. [109:28] >> So technology is predicated on [109:31] globalization global supply chains. [109:34] Okay. So you look at semiconductors well [109:37] if you look at who produces [109:39] semiconductors you find there like [109:40] hundreds of companies scattered [109:42] throughout the world. Okay. So maybe in [109:45] uh California you have Nvidia designing [109:48] the chips. Then the chip design goes to [109:51] Taiwan to be to be manufactured. Then it [109:54] goes to Philippines to be value added. [109:56] Then it goes to China to uh be be um [110:00] assembled to appliances. Meanwhile you [110:03] have uh you know South America, Africa [110:05] providing rare earths and lithium, [110:08] copper, silver that goes into [110:10] semiconductors. you have European [110:13] companies like uh ADSL [110:16] manufacturing uh the machines to [110:20] actually uh make the semic the [110:23] semiconductors okay so it's a global [110:25] supply chain that so technology is [110:27] impossible without a global supply chain [110:29] network you will not find a place that [110:31] is simply self-sufficient in technology [110:34] all right so the idea that okay maybe [110:37] robots will replace us that's just [110:40] absurd because it's really expensive to [110:43] produce a robot, but it's cheap to [110:46] produce a human being and then uh what [110:49] you can do is microchip that human being [110:52] and turn that human into a robot, right? [110:56] You could from scratch try to [110:58] manufacture a robot, but you would need [111:00] a global supply chain, which is hard in [111:01] a time of war. Or you could take, you [111:04] know, millions of young Indians or young [111:08] Africans and then microchip them. So um [111:14] so that I think is really the future and [111:17] the idea that you know you have this [111:19] decentralized [111:20] internet um that that will resolve a lot [111:23] of issues. It doesn't really work [111:25] because um you have to solve the [111:27] hardware issue. The hardware issue you [111:29] need you need a global supply chain. [111:33] Sorry, I'm afraid I don't track that [111:35] idea. Um, yeah, of course you're always [111:38] going to need hardware, you know, for [111:40] your software to run on and to be [111:41] connect with and so on and so forth. [111:43] >> Yeah. [111:43] >> But a decentralized mesh network, you [111:45] know, that's across the world [snorts] [111:47] where the the internet is running on the [111:49] nodes, the individual nodes of a [111:50] computer. [111:52] Um I don't see the direct connection [111:55] between the supply chain and so on. [111:57] >> What if Iran were were to cut the [111:58] internet cables in the humus? [112:02] >> What would happen then? [112:03] >> They would rely on our friends and [112:04] family. They're just right here. [112:06] >> No, no, no, no. I'm saying what would [112:07] happen to the internet if Iran were to [112:11] cut off all the internet cables in the [112:13] state of Humus that that that like [112:15] supply a third of the world with like [112:17] banking services, digital banking [112:19] services. [112:20] Unfortunately, I'm not a techie, but um [112:22] I'm not certain that that would actually [112:24] cut off the mesh network that's running [112:25] across all these computers throughout [112:27] the United States. [112:30] >> Okay. Well, well, we we we debate this, [112:33] but but I I think like you know [112:34] software, you need hardware. The [112:37] hardware you need a global supply chain. [112:39] So it is possible to like okay have [112:42] backups but at the same time you have to [112:44] maintain them you have to repair them [112:46] and you need uh critical critical [112:48] minerals from around the world. Okay. [112:50] All right. Uh let's let's continue. [112:53] Professor Jang sorry I have two uh quick [112:55] questions. Uh my first one is um in [112:58] terms of modern books. Um is there a [113:02] particular book that you think [113:04] encapsulates your belief in the Gnostic [113:07] monad uh pretty well? Um there was a [113:10] book I read 10 years ago that when you [113:13] started talking I was like oh my god [113:14] this really relates. It's called [113:15] Conversations with God. So, I'm just [113:18] curious what if you had any suggestions [113:20] aside from like the Bible or just, you [113:22] know, uh the Quran or whatever people's [113:24] uh wherever they practice, what what do [113:26] you suggest if there's anything? [113:28] >> Um, so I'm not sure of any modern works, [113:31] but um I I think I think the issue is I [113:35] read a lot of novels when I was younger, [113:37] and it's been only like the past 2 years [113:39] since I became fascinated with the monad [113:41] and I really believe in God. So for most [113:43] my adult life I was an atheist and I [113:45] read novels through the lens of atheism. [113:48] But I think that if I were to go back [113:49] and read a lot of modern novels then I [113:52] would see an occult spiritual element to [113:55] these novels. And one book that comes in [113:57] mind is like maybe the god of small [113:59] things by um and roty in India. [114:03] >> What was it again? [114:04] >> The god of small things. [114:06] >> The god of small things. Yeah. [114:08] >> Okay. Thank you. And then um my last [114:10] question is um on Hassan Piker's uh [114:13] interview you had mentioned or I guess [114:15] the conversation of visiting uh the [114:18] rabbis grave came up and then Hassan [114:21] brought up uh you know that uh [114:24] Zorohan um had visited the grave site [114:27] and your reaction was really like you [114:29] were super shocked. uh Jimmy door [114:31] recently or not like a couple weeks ago [114:33] he had mentioned that uh Zorhan's wife [114:36] uh was supporting Syrian uh um like uh [114:40] pe people that overthrew the Syrian [114:42] government. So, do you think that, you [114:45] know, Zorhan and these people might be [114:48] somewhat the new Bernie Sanders or or [114:50] people that cuz all this energy of of [114:52] change needs to go somewhere, right? So, [114:54] then do you think that like this this is [114:57] just not a new group of people where uh [115:00] people are getting hoodwinkedked, so to [115:01] speak, and you know, like they're like [115:04] it's not really what they appear to be. [115:06] >> Okay, so I think this is a really good [115:08] question. It's very complicated because [115:10] you look at really successful people and [115:12] they're able to operate in many [115:14] different dimensions and they appear [115:17] like different people to different to [115:19] different to different people. Okay. Um [115:22] so another saying if you're a politician [115:25] you need to be a cipher. You need to be [115:28] a blank so that other people can impose [115:31] their fences on to you. Right? So if [115:33] we're maybe if we're leftist and we see [115:35] uh Mandani we think okay this guy shares [115:38] our perspective but if you are maybe [115:40] religious and you're Islam then you're [115:42] like well he shares our perspect [115:44] perspective as well. So they're very [115:45] successful people. They're able to [115:47] operate at the intersection of many [115:49] different groups. Okay? And as a result, [115:53] these people are first and foremost [115:55] opportunistic. [115:57] Okay? They are not concerned about [116:00] ideology. They're not concerned about [116:02] achieving a certain vision. They're [116:03] opportunistic. So they will shift [116:06] according to the political winds. So I [116:08] cannot tell you that Madani will do [116:12] this. It depends on what happens in New [116:15] York City uh over the next few years. It [116:19] depends on what his political ambitions [116:21] are. He wants to climb as high as he [116:24] can. And for for Mcdani, that could [116:26] basically mean senator from New York or [116:29] governor of New York State. He can't be [116:30] president because he wasn't born here. [116:33] Um but he wants to climb as high as he [116:37] can. That means trying to appeal as many [116:39] different factions as possible. That's [116:42] why it's almost impossible to pigeon [116:44] hole his ideology because he doesn't [116:46] have any ideology. He's opportunistic. [116:48] Okay? He's a speculator. And I would say [116:51] that's true the same for any um [116:54] politician. And Trump is of course the [116:57] the archetype of a of a good politician [117:00] because uh he's able to shift all the [117:03] time. Um and he's able to align himself [117:05] different factions according to the [117:07] different um his different needs. Okay. [117:12] >> All right. Uh yes. [117:13] >> Um my name is Mark. We're uh Sarah, my [117:16] wife and I are both psychologists here [117:17] and we also work in Austin in the [117:20] psychedelic underground to help people [117:22] awaken and heal. And I was just curious, [117:25] you know, over the next 30 years, we [117:27] were contemplating becoming dual [117:29] citizens in Canada and bringing our [117:31] daughter up there just to have uh the [117:35] ability to move back and forth depending [117:37] on what's going on. But I was just [117:39] curious if you had a a way for us to [117:42] kind of stay out of the fight and still [117:44] help people awaken and heal and also to [117:48] have our daughter be in a place that's [117:50] safeish, as safe as safe gets. [117:53] I think you should move to Japan. I I [117:56] and I I'll tell you why. Okay, Japan has [117:58] a huge problem. It's an aging crisis. [118:01] So, a lot of their population is elderly [118:04] and like if you know I'm not sure if [118:06] you've been to Japan, but if you've been [118:07] to Japan, you will know the place is [118:09] really really clean, people that are [118:11] like really really healthy and therefore [118:14] these people will live for a very long [118:16] time. I mean right now Japan is most [118:19] elderly population has most elderly [118:20] population in the world and they will [118:23] live a lot of them will live to 100 [118:25] years. This is a problem because Japan [118:28] doesn't have the resources to support [118:31] this um aging population. So you need to [118:35] convince them to kill themselves, [118:38] >> right? And [118:40] yeah, I hate to say this, okay, but like [118:42] you need to convince them to kill [118:43] themselves. And the best way to get for [118:45] them to get get them kill themselves is [118:46] if they were to do psyched psychedelics, [118:49] right? That's the solution. I'm serious, [118:51] guys. Okay? So, you've got like millions [118:53] of, you know, uh, Japanese people in [118:56] their 90s who refuse to die because [118:57] they're afraid of death. So, what you do [118:59] is you get them to do psychedelics, [119:01] right? And what they recognize is, wow, [119:04] death is just the beginning, and I don't [119:06] have to like suffer in my, you know, old [119:09] body. I can ascend uh to a higher plane [119:12] and spread my consciousness throughout [119:14] the universe. So would I rather just [119:16] suffer another 10 20 years in my like [119:18] old decor body live in this miserable [119:21] life or do I just like you know die [119:23] right now and then move to a higher [119:25] plane and and experience the the [119:27] universe for all all its madness. Okay. [119:30] So so my advice is Japan. Okay. [119:33] >> Yeah. You think I'm joking but I'm not [119:36] joking. Okay. [119:37] >> Yes. Uh who's next? [119:40] >> Yeah. [119:41] >> Um hello, Professor Young. Um thank you [119:44] for um coming to Austin. It's truly [119:46] beautiful out here. Um as you know, like [119:49] uh with the you mentioned about the [119:51] global, you know, um supply chains [119:53] being, you know, interrupted and uh the [119:57] impending I guess energy crisis we have, [119:59] you know, upon us. Um I want to kind of [120:02] get your view on like how the [120:05] manipulation is being going on uh in the [120:08] energy markets and then um how does that [120:11] like impact the economic collapse that [120:15] we have impending upon us uh and how can [120:17] we like survive from that and kind of [120:20] you know play it out. [120:22] >> Yeah, that's a great question. So um it [120:24] is it is clear they are manipulating the [120:26] energy markets. It is clear that the [120:29] problem the crisis is much greater than [120:31] we can imagine. Okay. Um we are going to [120:36] very soon experience very high gas gas [120:39] prices but also you'll have famine [120:41] starvation Africa. Uh you'll have like [120:43] energy wars all around the world. So [120:46] they are trying to hide it as much as [120:48] possible but like they can't defy [120:51] reality and sooner or later you're going [120:53] to have um huge problems throughout [120:55] throughout the world. Uh so how the [120:58] energy prices are being manipulated is [121:01] um there are many different things they [121:02] do um so one thing that they do is they [121:07] use um US treasuries and I'm talking [121:09] about Scott Basson and the Treasury [121:10] Department. They're using US treasuries [121:13] um and uh US uh capital in order to [121:19] um give people the impression that the [121:24] stock the stock market's under control. [121:26] Okay. And I I don't I'm not a financial [121:28] trader. I I don't know how they do so. [121:30] But clearly there is financial injection [121:32] by the US government to keep um oil [121:35] prices um low. The other thing that's [121:39] happening is United States and China has [121:40] an agreement where China has agreed to [121:43] reduce demand on its part. Uh and that's [121:47] what what's actually keeping energy [121:48] prices very low because China has cut [121:50] off 50% of of its imports. And a lot of [121:53] it is just an agreement between United [121:54] States and and China. But as you can [121:57] appreciate, all of this are just [121:59] short-term fixes. Doesn't really result [122:01] the long-term problem of like 25% a [122:06] third of the world's energy has been cut [122:08] off from the world. And not only that, [122:11] but um there are byproduct byproducts of [122:15] energy that are very important for the [122:17] global economy. They include [122:19] fertilizers, right? You need fertilizers [122:21] to grow food. So the real world impact [122:25] has not been felt yet, but we will feel [122:27] it very very soon and there's really no [122:30] way to get um around it. Um again, you [122:35] guys are lucky to be in Texas because [122:38] Texas is essentially self-sufficient, [122:40] right? You grow your own food and uh you [122:43] have your own energy. So you guys will [122:46] probably weather the storm better than [122:47] other people. But if you're in like [122:49] California or New York City, you're kind [122:50] of screwed. [122:52] um inflation is going to go way up. Um [122:55] they're they're gonna have to like [122:56] create they're have have to have [122:57] basically uh destroy the mad. Okay. [123:00] Basically [123:02] like stop flights around the world. Uh [123:05] you know um um and it's also possible [123:08] and and they've been talk talking about [123:11] this is there might be blackouts [123:15] next year for a long long time. Um, and [123:18] a lot of these blackouts will be a [123:20] controlled implosion of energy demand [123:24] because right now the uh uh United [123:27] States cannot sustain all this energy [123:29] demand. Okay? You can't have people with [123:32] air conditioners cracked up all the time [123:34] driving their SUVs, flying all around [123:36] the world. Okay? The United States [123:38] doesn't have the energy supply. Um, and [123:42] so it needs to destroy demand. Okay. All [123:45] right. Uh, who's next? [123:48] Hey, professor. Um, I wanted to zoom out [123:51] of uh America a little bit and uh pick [123:54] your brain on Pax Judea. So, obviously [123:57] Israel is bombing several different [123:59] countries obviously, you know, killing [124:01] children in Palestine um directly or [124:04] indirectly, Iran, uh Lebanon, Syria, but [124:08] now they've, you know, recently come out [124:09] and they're provoking Turkey. And um [124:13] just alluding to that video that you [124:15] referenced with Rabbi Schneerson when [124:17] Rabbi Schneerson was talking to Benjamin [124:19] Netanyahu he almost you could almost see [124:22] Netanyahu Netanyahu's face change as he [124:25] mentioned the Messiah and he's like come [124:26] on man like hurry up. So my question is [124:31] don't you see the Middle East going into [124:34] allout warfare fairly quickly? [124:36] >> Yeah. No, I completely agree. You know I [124:38] I've talked about this a lot on [124:40] podcasts. Uh, so I just did a uh [124:43] interview with Danny Jones and we go [124:44] into four hours about this. Okay, so it [124:46] comes out tomorrow. You should [124:47] definitely check it out. Okay, but I [124:48] explain the entire plan and you're [124:50] actually right in that it the entire [124:53] purpose of this war in the Middle East. [124:54] It is to force the coming of the [124:56] Messiah. Okay, it's and it's it's been [124:59] in this and uh this plan has been around [125:00] for 100 years, 200 years. And so it is [125:04] impossible to understand this war from a [125:07] geopolitical lens because it makes no [125:08] sense. Why would you attack Iran for no [125:10] reason? Why would you like collapse the [125:12] global economy like this? Um but if you [125:15] look at it from es esqueological lens, [125:18] this is a war to force a war of magog [125:21] which will bring about the end times. [125:23] Then a lot makes a lot more sense. Um [125:26] and unfortunately these are the people [125:28] in power uh today. Okay. All right. [125:33] >> Uh thank you professor. I'm just curious [125:35] uh what spiritual practices, study or [125:38] experiences have had the largest impact [125:40] on your paradigm? [125:42] >> Uh being with children. I have three [125:44] young kids and being with children, it's [125:48] really reshaped [125:52] um the way the way I see the world [125:55] because before having children, I just [125:57] thought that the your children are blank [125:59] slates. So if you just do certain things [126:03] then your children will uh turn out the [126:06] way that you want them to turn out and [126:08] and like when you actually have children [126:10] you recognize that each child has a [126:12] distinct personality and that's like [126:14] from the moment he or she is born the [126:16] moment that he or she leaves the womb he [126:19] or she already has a own personality has [126:23] his own worldview has his own tilos [126:25] purpose in life and like you can uh and [126:28] no matter what you do you can't actually [126:29] change that kid's personality and it's [126:32] been a struggle uh these past um eight [126:35] years because for the longest time I was [126:37] really wedded to the idea that you know [126:40] through my own uh practice through my [126:44] own habits of mind and work I can [126:45] influence a child for the better and the [126:46] answer is you cannot okay so uh so once [126:51] but once you let go of that mindset I [126:54] need to manipulate my child so that he [126:56] or she can triumph the meritocracy you [126:59] focus on loving a child for who or who [127:02] who he or she is and who she he or she [127:05] is is a gift from God. Okay? A child is [127:08] a gift from God and he or she is here to [127:12] be with you for a set number of years [127:16] but he or she is going to leave you and [127:18] live his her own life sooner or later. [127:20] And what you should do is appreciate all [127:22] the time you can have with your child. [127:25] Um so being with children has really [127:29] um animated my understanding of God and [127:33] the purpose of God and his or her [127:37] intentions and uh it's made me a better [127:40] person. [127:42] So, um I think like now that I look back [127:46] on everything, I think like the purpose [127:48] of our life here is to have a family [127:51] because once you have a family, that [127:53] really brings you closer to God. Okay. [127:58] >> Well, Professor Jong, welcome to Texas. [128:00] Um I had a question in response to your [128:03] Dante series and your civilization [128:05] series. Y [128:06] >> uh I take it from that that you believe [128:09] that there will be a next Dante that [128:11] that's also part of the cycles. Uh [128:13] sometimes it just comes from above and [128:16] that inspiration that message that's uh [128:19] could potentially be coming. Do you [128:21] think that there is a degree of wisdom [128:24] that needs needs to come down from some [128:27] sort of like you said the coming age of [128:29] prophets, right? that there needs to be [128:31] someone who's divinely inspired and they [128:33] will have a message that could possibly [128:36] avert humanity from your worst [128:38] predictions like you've been mentioning [128:40] almost near total extinction and just a [128:43] complete reversal of everything we know. [128:44] So what do you think about that? [128:46] >> Okay, so first of all I think [128:50] that um [128:53] what's coming is part of the plan. Okay. [128:58] Yes, a lot of people are going to die. [128:59] There'll be a lot of suffering. We'll be [129:02] become much more impoverished than we [129:04] used to be. But really, if you think [129:07] feel think about it, the purpose of our [129:08] existence is to raise our consciousness. [129:12] And unfortunately, you cannot have [129:14] wisdom without suffering. You cannot [129:17] raise your conscious consciousness [129:18] unless you hit rock bottom. Okay? And [129:21] that's the story of my life. So um I [129:23] discover a lot through life but I'm I [129:26] I'm grateful for all the suffering [129:28] because it's led me to wisdom. It's led [129:31] me to enlightenment. It's led me to to [129:33] God. So um I feel as though what's [129:38] coming is very optimistic because this [129:40] is really the spiritual awakening of [129:43] humanity. Um so I think that rather than [129:46] think okay a prophet's going to come I [129:49] think rather all the pieces already in [129:51] place all the material you need for your [129:54] own spiritual awakening already in place [129:55] you can read the Bible you can read [129:57] Jesus you can read Plato you can read [129:59] Homer you can read Dante all all that is [130:01] out there for your own individual uh [130:05] enlightenment but like you need to want [130:08] it and unfortunately for you to want it [130:11] you need to [130:13] um um suffer through life and I think so [130:18] I think like um the next 20 30 years yes [130:22] it does mean uh material suffering but [130:26] it will also mean a divine awakening. [130:31] Okay. Yep. [130:34] Yes. [130:36] >> Yes. So, professor um one of your [130:39] prediction about the uh population trend [130:42] over next 50 years um I think it's quite [130:46] dark um like 90% decrease. My question [130:51] number one is uh do you have an updated [130:53] number um and how are you preparing your [130:56] family and especially your children to [130:58] face that dark reality? [131:01] >> Yeah. Um so [131:04] as I study the cult more and more as I [131:08] deepen my knowledge what I recognize is [131:12] um you should always trust God and you [131:15] should always trust yourself. So [131:19] um many people will be like you if you [131:22] know that all that's going to happen is [131:24] human suffering for the next 50 years [131:26] and 9% of humanity will be wiped out. [131:29] Why do you choose to have children? [131:31] And my answer is well first of all um [131:36] our own [131:38] destiny is what we make of it. All [131:40] right. So just because most people will [131:42] die doesn't mean you will have to die. [131:43] It's really your choice whether or not [131:45] you die or not. Um that's the first [131:49] thing. Second thing is [131:51] um having children is really a leap of [131:55] faith and it's it's an act of faith. [131:58] It's a belief in God and you're making [132:00] the world a better place each time you [132:03] have a leap of faith. Um each time you [132:07] have um your trust in God. So the world [132:12] isn't something that you could plan out [132:14] and say, "Well, I know that the world is [132:16] going to collapse and like 90% of [132:18] humanity will die out and so I need to [132:22] build a bunker. So I need to go make $10 [132:23] million and then uh get a bunker and I [132:26] and I I I need to become best friends [132:27] with Peter Theo and uh that'll save me." [132:30] No, no, no. That's not how it works. [132:32] Okay? You don't plan it out. What you [132:34] say is I know what is true and I know [132:36] what is true is God exists and God loves [132:39] us and everything happens for a purpose. [132:42] What I also know is true is um to be a [132:45] good person is more important to to be a [132:48] wealthy person. Right? So if I'm having [132:51] children and I teach them to be good [132:53] people, if I if I myself am a good [132:56] person and the one thing that I can do [132:59] that would would set a good example for [133:01] my children is if I always speak the [133:04] truth and I fight hard to speak the [133:06] truth, that's enough. Then I can place [133:08] my faith in God. then I can place my [133:10] faith in the universe because uh you [133:13] know having read Dante, having read [133:15] Homer, um God does exist and God does um [133:20] have a plan. And so if you do a if you [133:24] act in a good way, then God will take [133:28] care of the rest. Okay? And again, I [133:30] can't explain it. I'd be like, "Well, [133:31] you know, like aren't you better off [133:33] with $50 million?" I'm like, "No, I'm [133:35] actually better off just speaking the [133:36] truth." [133:38] Okay? Yep. [snorts] [133:40] >> Yep. [133:41] >> Thank you, Professor Jang. It's an honor [133:43] to meet you. Um, I found myself in an [133:46] interesting situation last night on [133:47] Sixth Street downtown, 6th Avenue. Uh, [133:50] there was a person there holding a sign [133:52] said Jesus saves. And it was really like [133:55] a chaotic situation. There's really a [133:57] lot of odd people there. I took the [133:59] opportunity to ask him. Um, I was [134:01] wondering had he ever heard of the Monet [134:03] and uh, he had never heard of it before. [134:07] Uh, I had never heard of it. I went to [134:08] Catholic school um and later became [134:11] atheist, agnostic. I didn't know what I [134:13] was and came back to more of an [134:14] understanding of Christ as a person and [134:16] a prophet. Um but is there an [134:19] opportunity that a portion of the [134:22] Catholic population could be introduced [134:24] to this? And [134:27] I mean maybe in a best case scenario, [134:29] it's a a monad nationalistic [134:32] surveillance state. uh and not a not not [134:35] like a strict Jesus one that we have [134:36] today with these people who don't really [134:38] know what it is. Um and if that were the [134:41] case, would that be the defeat of the [134:42] Monad? Um but I it's a kind of a loaded [134:45] question. I don't know if I if it's [134:47] >> um could we go that way and win? [134:51] >> Um and then just at a topper of that, [134:53] was Jesus aware of the allegory of [134:55] Plato's cave and the Monad? [134:57] >> Yeah. So I think Jesus was very much [134:59] aware of the idea even though he myself [135:01] may not have read Plato. Okay. So I [135:03] think Jesus was first and foremost a [135:05] poet. So if you want to understand [135:08] Jesus, read his words. Okay. So it's [135:12] really interesting because [135:15] um [135:18] you know Jesus is really the only [135:21] major religious figure where we actually [135:24] have his words, right? We don't have the [135:25] words of Buddha. We don't have the words [135:27] of Muhammad. We don't have the words of [135:30] u um [135:33] um yeah no Jesus the is the only one I [135:36] mean can someone else think of another [135:38] major religious figure where we have his [135:41] >> Buddha [135:43] >> do we have do we have his [135:44] >> don't we have the word from [135:47] >> I don't think so do we do we [135:49] >> book me [135:50] >> it's a fictional book [135:51] >> by Herman has right [135:53] >> but we don't actually have what actually [135:55] said but we do have [135:57] >> can argue the anything about Jesus. [136:00] >> No, no, no, no. Those words were spoken [136:02] by Jesus. [136:03] >> Gospel, the Gospel of Thomas and Gospel [136:06] of Judas is more about Jesus [136:09] than uh or just as much. Let's [136:12] >> so if you look at the Gospel of Thomas, [136:14] a lot of his quotations [136:16] do appear in the other gospels, right? [136:19] The Gospel of Matthew, the gospel of [136:21] Mark. So, what I'm trying to say is [136:23] this. Jesus was a religious leader. He [136:26] was a son of God. doesn't matter. Okay. [136:28] He was first and foremost a poet. And [136:31] the thing about poets is they speak the [136:33] truth in a way that becomes music in [136:36] your ear so that you never forget it. [136:38] And this music first of all you can't [136:40] forget it but you can also speak it to [136:43] other people and it becomes almost like [136:45] a virus. Okay? It's like a mind virus. [136:48] And that's why um they were able to [136:52] cleanse or wipe out the teachings of [136:55] Muhammad and Buddha, but they were not [136:58] able to to wipe out the teachings of [136:59] Jesus because of his poetry. Right? So [137:03] if you want to know who Jesus is, don't [137:06] just read what he spoke his poetry and [137:10] it includes you know the um gospel of [137:12] Thomas but also includes the um sermon [137:14] on the mount. Okay, that's pure poetry. [137:16] If you actually know the Arabic Aramaic [137:18] uh the original uh Aramaic then you know [137:20] it's beautiful music it's poetry. So he [137:23] was like Dante and Homer in in that way. [137:26] And what this is important is [137:29] um if we are able to convince everyone [137:32] to just recite [137:35] uh the teachings of Jesus then that [137:37] gives him access to the Mona. Okay. [137:39] That's why Jesus spoke out the truth [137:42] because he wanted people to hear right. [137:44] He says um um listen those who want to [137:49] hear and once you hear then you're able [137:53] to feel the monad you're able to feel [137:54] the source once you speak out speak out [137:57] these words then you then you're able to [137:59] to like communicate with the monad [138:01] that's how I feel when I read the divine [138:02] comedy you know when I actually teach [138:04] the divine comedy and I feel in in [138:07] intimate connection with the monad okay [138:11] so I'm a huge fan of Jesus even though I [138:13] myself not a Jesus was not a Christian, [138:15] guys. Okay? If if he if Jesus were to [138:18] come today, he'd be like, "What is this [138:20] crowd? This is not what I wanted, man." [138:22] All right. But he wanted us to read his [138:24] poetry. So, I think um you know, [138:27] everyone should read the Gospel of [138:28] Thomas. I think everyone should read the [138:31] Gospel of Mark. Yeah. [138:33] >> Okay. [138:33] >> If I could add to that real quickly, [138:35] there's a I believe her name is Sarah [138:37] Ruden. She does ancient Greek and she [138:40] translated she did a book called the [138:42] Gospels. [138:42] >> Yeah. And so it's a really you can read [138:44] it in the way that it was spoken in [138:46] Greek. [138:47] >> The apostles wrote it and I have really [138:49] enjoyed [138:50] >> it's music. [138:50] >> Yes. I've really enjoyed going through [138:52] and reading that. And then there are [138:54] words in Aramaic that don't translate to [138:56] Greek. [138:57] >> Yeah. [138:57] >> She uh leaves those in there so you can [139:00] see what's going on. Yeah. [139:01] >> You'd really enjoy it. I think anybody [139:02] that wants to [139:03] >> Exactly. [139:04] >> dive in. It's called the Gospels. I [139:06] believe it's by Sarah Ruden. She's a a [139:09] Greek scholar. [139:10] >> Ru D I N. uh r u den I think [139:12] >> right she's a a Greek scholar and she [139:15] did a beautiful job translating [139:18] >> is a prophet [139:20] >> yes absolutely he was a prophet okay all [139:22] of them were pro were were prophets all [139:24] of them were messengers of god okay that [139:26] includes room includes um um Dante Homer [139:30] Plato Jesus Muhammad [139:32] >> Zerusa [139:33] >> zerusa as well okay any major religious [139:36] figure was a poet and also messenger of [139:39] god Um, so, uh, I think everyone's [139:42] hungry, so so maybe three three more [139:44] questions, then we'll we'll we'll we'll [139:46] break. Okay. [139:48] >> All right. First, thank you for being [139:50] here. I wanted to bring up the fake [139:53] alien invasion again cuz it's been a [139:56] while. [139:56] >> Yeah. [139:57] >> And I just wanted to know if that's [139:59] still in the works for the end of the [140:01] world or any updated thoughts. [140:03] >> Yeah, I think it's I think it's going to [140:05] happen, guys. Um, I I think there are a [140:07] lot of signs that suggest like [140:09] disclosure is coming. I think there will [140:11] be a faked alien invasion. You know, Tim [140:13] Dylan talks about it. You know, guys, [140:15] like I can't say enough nice things [140:17] about Tim Dylan, okay? I mean, he's a [140:20] man who could be best friends with Peter [140:22] Theo. He's a man who could have to ease [140:25] his life and instead he's choosing to be [140:27] a truth speaker. Okay? So, I mean, he [140:30] talks talk talks about the uh fake alien [140:32] invasion and like, you know, like they [140:34] have to burn things down. They need they [140:36] need to justify the AI surveillance [140:37] state. So, they'll fake an alien [140:39] invasion, lots of chaos, lots of deaths, [140:41] and then they'll bring in um some um the [140:45] AI surveillance. So, I think it it is [140:46] happening, but on their timeline. Okay. [140:49] And so, I would say probably the Trump [140:52] third term. [140:53] >> Yeah. Okay. Yes. I can't help but be [140:56] reminded of a foundation by Isaac [140:58] Azimoff. And so I'm curious, you know, [141:01] Harry Seldon starts the foundation to [141:03] slow the uh like slow the period of the [141:06] dark ages. I'm curious, do you think [141:08] there are any actions where, you know, [141:10] you've argued that the fall of [141:12] civilization is inevitable, but can we [141:14] adjust the timeline? So accelerate, [141:16] decelerate, or reduce the term of [141:18] suffering. [141:19] >> Yeah. So it's interesting because [141:21] foundation is something that these techs [141:23] love. Okay. So they read so I mean so [141:27] Peter the Ellen Mus sent Alman they're [141:30] not religious but they're messianic [141:33] they're esqueological and the reason why [141:34] is as kids they read the foundation like [141:38] myself and they loved it okay and they [141:40] believe that yes history does go in [141:43] cycles and so if we are able to maybe in [141:46] five years time complete the cycle [141:50] suffering wouldn't that be better I mean [141:52] we might have to kill 8 billion people. [141:54] But if in 5 years later we go back to [141:57] prosperity and peace, that's worth it, [141:59] right? So um before I would agree with [142:03] that analysis, okay? And before I be an [142:06] accelerationist, I would agree that you [142:08] know destroying the world so that we can [142:10] repair it is probably you know the means [142:12] just finally the ends. Now I disagree. [142:14] Now I think like the world is meant to [142:17] be destroyed because the world is a [142:18] delusion. the our material world is an [142:21] illusion that's preventing us from [142:23] seeking spiritual truth. And so God [142:28] God's intention is to destroy this [142:30] world, not to remake it, but to free us [142:33] from our imprisonment, from our material [142:35] imprisonment. And so um rather than see [142:38] the end of the world as something to be [142:40] mitigated or something to be quickly [142:43] accelerated, I see it as really an [142:44] opportunity to liberate the human [142:46] imagination. [142:48] Okay. Okay. Okay, one more question. [142:49] >> Acceleration is or deceleration? [142:52] >> Uh I'm I'm neither. I'm like um [142:55] >> whatever comes it is. [142:57] >> Yes. Yes. Okay. One last question, guys, [142:59] and and then and then we'll Yes. [143:01] >> Um thanks for coming. I came all the way [143:03] from St. Louis, Missouri to come and see [143:05] you. So [143:06] >> Oh my god. Thank you so much. [143:08] >> Thank you. [143:09] >> Um I wanted to ask first, I don't know [143:11] if we'll have time for questions like [143:13] oneon-one later. If not, I'll just ask [143:15] that question. [143:16] >> Yeah. Can you I can ask it now. Well, if [143:18] I for pictures because like you know a [143:20] lot of people want some pictures, but [143:22] yeah. [143:22] >> Yeah. Um is actually in regards to your [143:25] studies with like sex culture as well as [143:28] uh Gates um which I know was like your [143:30] last video that you had done with um [143:32] predictive history. Um [143:35] are there any works by him or others [143:37] that you've come across in regards to [143:39] let's say like sex trauma and refinding [143:44] um a connection with [143:46] healthy sex I suppose? [143:50] >> Um I'm sorry. Could could you um ask a [143:52] question in a different way so I better [143:54] understand it? Um, [143:57] I know that like from some of the books [143:59] like Love Thy Neighbor, um, Gates Lee [144:04] hit on [144:06] different types of sex culture within [144:08] America kind of almost like u the [144:10] oddities of it at times. Um, are there [144:13] any works by him or by others that [144:15] you've come across in regards to like [144:16] sex trauma and how that affects life? I [144:18] know that you've talked about sex trauma [144:20] in terms of like uh the military during [144:24] Alexander the Great and how they that [144:25] was utilized uh to galvanize the troops [144:29] in a way to um for brotherhood and [144:32] camaraderie. But are there any works by [144:33] Gates or by others that you've come [144:35] across in regards to sex trauma and [144:37] specifically? [144:39] >> Um so [144:42] what is sex trauma? [144:43] >> Um like sexual abuse. [144:46] >> Okay. [144:48] [cough and clears throat] [144:48] um sexual abuse. [144:52] Um are you talking about books? [144:54] >> Yeah. Or if you've come across like are [144:56] there any books by Gates Lee [144:58] specifically or by others that have dug [145:00] into the idea of sex trauma? I work as a [145:02] psychiatric nurse practitioner so I come [145:04] across [145:05] it a lot in patients and how it affects [145:08] their development as they get older. Um, [145:11] and I was just curious if you've come [145:12] across any works or any any information [145:15] specifically in regards to that or in [145:17] the terms of like spirituality and how [145:19] it's healed through spirituality. [145:22] >> Yeah. So that's a really tough question. [145:25] Um, and I have I don't I don't know any [145:28] books but um I do know that sex trauma [145:34] is a very important part of programming [145:37] children. Right? So, think of MK Ultra [145:40] and and these experiments. Look, MK [145:43] Ultra is a very real pervasive part of [145:48] our culture. Uh because if you're the [145:50] elite, you want to program your children [145:52] in a way that allows you to assume the [145:55] responsibilities of being being the [145:57] elite, which just basically means being [145:58] evil, right? Being an evil psychopath. [146:01] And one way of uh programming children [146:04] that's very effective is through sex [146:06] trauma, right? So raping a child, why? [146:10] Because it creates bondage, [146:13] right? It might it might it might draw [146:15] the the child to suicide, but it also um [146:19] allows you to bond with a child. And the [146:21] people who practice this really well are [146:23] the Spartans. Okay. So what the Spartans [146:25] did was they wanted to create a society [146:27] of warriors of like war psychopaths, [146:30] right? So at age five, young children [146:33] were removed from their uh parents and [146:37] then they were bullied in school uh for [146:40] the next six seven years. So it's [146:42] creates trauma. Okay. Then what happens [146:44] is because there's this tear in the [146:47] child's psyche, the child when he's 12 [146:49] or 13, he's peered with an elder mentor [146:52] who might be like 28, 29, okay? And they [146:55] have sex, okay? We're talking about like [146:57] guys, okay? Like a young boy and and an [146:59] elder man. What this does is it programs [147:02] the child to be completely emotionally [147:05] dependent on the elder on the adult [147:09] because and and think about how in terms [147:11] of like military this is great because [147:14] the young child will now be will now [147:17] fight and die for the commander, right? [147:20] And so I I I mean this is how elites [147:22] work. elites um find children and [147:25] essentially traumatize the children and [147:28] those who um um basically do well in [147:32] experiment um then are put into position [147:35] of power. People like Camala Harris, I'm [147:37] not saying she's part of this, but like [147:39] she seems like it otherwise it's hard [147:41] for me to explain how she she was able [147:43] to climb to such a pinnacle of power. Um [147:47] and people like Emmanuel Muan may maybe. [147:50] Okay. So, so, so, so that's the most [147:52] effective way of controlling children. [147:55] You traumatize them. They have sex with [147:57] with the child. So, like the child [148:00] becomes completely emotionally dependent [148:01] on you and the child just basically does [148:04] whatever you you tell him. Now, there [148:06] are rejects, right? And they commit [148:08] suicide, but you know, that's just a [148:11] cost of this sort of thing. Okay. All [148:14] right. Thanks. That's great, guys. Okay. [148:17] All right. Thank you so much, [148:20] >> [applause] [148:23] >> All right, that's it. We'll have some [148:25] good music and we'll have great food. [148:29] So, yeah. Two.