## Detailed walkthrough
### [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=0s) Opening Remarks and Technical Hiccups
Professor Jiang opens the Montreal meetup by expressing his gratitude to Stella and her niece Sophia for doing the heavy lifting required to assemble the event. He recalls his initial meeting with Stella in New York City, assuming she had simply traveled down from Montreal, only for Stella to interject from the audience to clarify that she had actually flown in from Italy. He thanks attendees who traveled from afar, acknowledging Daniel, who traveled from Chicago, alongside other out-of-town guests.
Mid-greeting, Jiang pauses the presentation to attend to his young son, handing him an iPad to keep him occupied before requesting a brief do-over to begin the recording properly.
---
[01:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=74s) Montreal, Fame, and the Nature of Sabbatean-Frankism
Starting afresh, Jiang warmly welcomes the audience to the Montreal meetup and reiterates his deep appreciation for Stella and Sophia's efforts. Visiting Montreal for the first time, he describes it as a remarkable place where he has been recognized by passersby almost as frequently as in New York City, although with an amusing quirk: local fans rarely ask to take a photo with him.
He shares an anecdote from earlier that morning when he took his son to a local diner. The restaurant owner recognized Jiang and treated them to a complimentary breakfast. Recalling a similar experience in New York where an owner gave him free pizza, Jiang jokes about the practical perks of minor celebrity status: "being famous means I no longer have to starve," noting that if he ever runs out of money, he can just walk into an eatery and rely on a viewer to feed him.
Turning to the core subject, Jiang introduces the theme of the lecture: Sabbatean-Frankism and the nature of evil and sin in the world. He clarifies that this session will depart from his standard presentations by asking the audience to engage in a rigorous psychological thought experiment. Rather than observing from a detached viewpoint, attendees are challenged to step inside the minds and emotional landscape of the people who govern the world, examining their motives, behaviors, and inner fears.
---
[03:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=182s) The Spider-Man Thought Experiment: From Power to Existential Anxiety
Jiang initiates the thought experiment by asking the audience to imagine themselves back in high school on a science field trip to a laboratory. During the tour, an escaped radioactive spider bites you. Feeling unwell, you return home to sleep it off. When you wake the following morning, you find yourself completely transformed:
- Your body feels lighter, quicker, and vastly stronger.
- You can leap up to the ceiling and feel an instinctive impulse to scale walls.
- You can lift passenger vehicles with minimal effort and run at superhuman speeds.
At first, this sudden empowerment generates pure thrill. You join the basketball team, instantly becoming a star athlete. Yet within a few months, the initial euphoria inevitably curdles into deep-seated anxiety. Out of eight billion people on Earth, you alone have been singled out for transcendent abilities.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: The Psychological Evolution of Superhuman Power
accDescr: Diagram illustrating how sudden empowerment shifts from euphoria to cosmic anxiety and collective alignment.
subgraph S2["Phase 2: Internal Crisis"]
B --> C["Existential Anxiety<br/>('Why Me Out of 8 Billion?')"]
C --> D["Occult Obsession<br/>(Seeking the Hidden Cause)"]
end
subgraph S3["Phase 3: Preservation"]
D --> E["Alienation & Fear<br/>(State Retaliation / Capture)"]
E --> F["Formation of Secret Societies<br/>(Mutual Protection & Expansion)"]
end
```
Jiang argues that material explanations—such as getting bitten by a radioactive insect—fail to satisfy the human psyche. One is driven to wonder what spiritual force, whether God or a demon, engineered the event. This quest to uncover the hidden mechanism and divine or infernal patron behind one's exceptionalism is the true root of the occult:
- You wonder whether you are the Messiah tasked with a messianic mission.
- You lose sleep questioning why you were granted supernatural favor over the rest of mankind.
- You turn toward esoteric, occult doctrines to decipher who bestowed the gift and to what ultimate end.
---
[07:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=426s) Loneliness, Preservation, and the Birth of Secret Societies
Following a brief pause to adjust the microphone equipment, Jiang details the secondary crisis spawned by elite empowerment: profound loneliness and acute alienation. Once an individual realizes they are separate from common humanity, they become desperate to know whether others like them exist, how to identify them, and how to form alliances.
This urge is driven by the instinct for self-preservation. A solitary superhuman lives in constant terror that conventional institutions will uncover them, leading the government to capture, imprison, and vivisect them for scientific research. To insulate oneself from state predation, retain control, and consolidate power, one must seek out fellow outliers.
Jiang identifies three foundational drivers that explain the psychological architecture of secret societies:
1. **Cosmic Uncertainty:** An agonizing lack of understanding regarding the origin of their power, which forces them into occult investigation.
2. **Defensive Consolidation:** An existential urge to preserve power against rival authorities by finding and banding together with similarly empowered peers.
3. **Power Accumulation:** A relentless drive to expand and compound that power once secured.
Jiang points out that this precise framework unlocks the mindset of modern elites such as Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, and Peter Thiel. Anyone who amasses staggering wealth, fame, and dominance operates under this exact psychological tension.
---
[09:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=586s) The Ultimate Superpower: Sin, Amorality, and the Room Experiment
Jiang poses a fundamental question: what is the actual superpower that allows the ruling class to amass extraordinary fortunes and global authority? It is not superior intellect, nor is it an exceptional work ethic. Rather, their defining superpower is their capacity for **sin** and radical amorality.
To prove how this separates the elite from normal people, Jiang presents a second thought experiment:
- You are placed inside a room facing a table; seated across from you is an unknown man wearing a black hood.
- A handgun rests on the table between you.
- An authority figure enters and offers you \$10,000 to pick up the gun and execute the hooded stranger. Most people instantly refuse, recognizing that \$10,000 is trivial compared to taking a human life.
- The offer is raised to \$1 million. While tempting—Jiang jokes that in modern Montreal, a million dollars might buy you half a house—it is still not enough to overcome the moral boundary.
- The offer climbs to \$10 million or higher: a sum that fundamentally alters life.
At this threshold, the vast majority of regular people (99.9999%) might mentally accept the terms and desire the payout. Yet the moment their fingers touch the weapon, physiological paralysis sets in. Their hands shake, their bodies freeze, and an immovable barrier—whether described as human conscience, inherent morality, or an angelic presence—physically halts the act.
In stark contrast, Jiang argues that figures like Jeff Bezos, Peter Thiel, or Sam Altman possess the rare psychological ability to lift the weapon, pull the trigger without hesitation, and walk away feeling absolutely no remorse. That uninhibited capacity for predation and sin is the engine of their supremacy. Because this amoral capability elevates them above the paralyzed masses, it simultaneously infects them with the identical anxiety of the superhero: an obsessive need to rationalize their unnatural ruthlessness, a search for spiritual justification in the occult, and an imperative to join secret cabals to safeguard their empire.
As Jiang wraps up this thesis, an audience member raises a hand to pose a clarifying question.
[14:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=852s) The Superpower of the Elite: Transgression and Sabbatean-Frankism
An audience member opens with a question about figures like Sam Altman or Peter Thiel, suggesting that potential figures like them exist everywhere throughout society. The questioner posits that at some crucial juncture, such individuals surely faced moral dilemmas and felt the prick of conscience; perhaps their real "superpower is the capacity to wash that sin." Professor Jiang acknowledges the point and asks to proceed with the core lecture, promising that the broader framework will become much clearer once laid out in full.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: Elite Power Dynamic
accDescr: Progression from rule-breaking to theological justification among modern elites.
A["Capacity to Transgress<br/>(Lie, Cheat, Break Rules)"] --> B["Rapid Institutional Ascent<br/>(Climbing Corporate & Bureaucratic Ladders)"]
B --> C["Psychological Need for Rationalization<br/>('Why do I have this power?')"]
C --> D["Sabbatean-Frankist Framework<br/>(Theology of Holy Sin)"]
```
Jiang asserts directly that within the modern world, the capacity to sin functions as an immense superpower. Individuals who are willing to shatter standard rules and do what ordinary people refuse to do ascend bureaucratic and corporate hierarchies far more smoothly than their peers. Taking Sam Altman as a prime case study in the artificial intelligence landscape, Jiang notes that anyone familiar with him understands his distinguishing edge is not technical competence: Altman does not code, spends no time programming, and possesses no genuine scientific or engineering talent. Rather, his true talent is a distinct superpower to cheat, lie, and steal to secure his objectives. Though not an exceptional public orator, in one-on-one private conversations Altman tells his interlocutor precisely what they wish to hear, even if it is an outright falsehood.
Jiang expands this assessment across the highest echelons of the global ruling class. Achieving billionaire status demands a psychology fundamentally alienated from that of everyday people. While the public casually labels these figures "psychopaths," Jiang argues that raw psychopathy alone is insufficient: to operate as an effective psychopath while remaining capable of sleeping at night, an individual requires an underlying philosophy or religion. This ideological framework rationalizes their destructive superpower, providing a moral narrative for why they possess it and how it ought to be deployed. Jiang identifies this ideology as Sabbatean-Frankism—a system largely unknown to the general public, yet functioning as the governing theological current among elites.
- Modern institutional hierarchies heavily favor actors capable of breaking ethical boundaries over technically skilled peers.
- Sam Altman serves as an archetypal case: lacking programming and scientific aptitude, his leverage stems from manipulative interpersonal persuasion.
- Sabbatean-Frankism provides the psychological and metaphysical rationalization required for elites to act out high-stakes psychopathy without moral paralysis.
---
[17:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=1065s) The Counterintuitive Psychology of Capital: Max Weber and Double Predestination
To trace the origins of Sabbatean-Frankism, Jiang first re-examines the foundations of capitalism, referencing German sociologist Max Weber's foundational work, *The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism*. Weber's core thesis established that the Protestant Reformation was the historical catalyst that enabled modern capitalism to emerge. Throughout the vast majority of human history, accumulating abstract financial wealth held little intrinsic value. Jiang proposes a thought experiment: if an individual today were suddenly handed $10 million in gold coins falling from the sky, modern conditioning prompts them to invest it into the stock market or deposit it into a bank.
From an organic historical standpoint, however, entrusting concrete gold to an abstract entity like a stock exchange or banking ledger is counterintuitive and irrational, as one cannot guarantee its return. Traditionally, human societies responded to large windfalls by redistributing the gold among their local community, staging lavish celebrations and banquets. In doing so, wealth was immediately transformed into tangible social status, elevating the distributor to the standing of an elder or chieftain—wielding direct, visible power over human beings rather than accumulating abstract ledger balances.
The transformation toward counterintuitive modern financial behavior originated in the Catholic Church's historic monopoly on the afterlife. Medieval Catholic authority rested on its claimed power to dictate salvation, damnation, and the exact duration of a soul's purification in purgatory. This ultimate authority generated systemic corruption: the Church commodified salvation through indulgences, granting wealthy donors passes through purgatory and into heaven in exchange for financing cathedral construction. This transactional regime provoked fury among reformers like Martin Luther and John Calvin. Recognizing that the Church's earthly power derived entirely from its role as arbiter of salvation, Calvin struck at the core of ecclesiastical leverage by introducing the doctrine of double predestination.
- Max Weber identified the Protestant Reformation as the historical precondition for the rise of capitalist psychology.
- Traditional societies translated physical wealth into immediate social status and communal leadership via feast-giving rather than abstract financial savings.
- The Roman Catholic Church derived political and economic leverage from its claimed monopoly over the dispensing of grace, purgatory durations, and celestial salvation.
---
[22:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=1327s) Calvinist Anxiety, Dutch Finance, and the 1694 Sovereign Debt Revolution
Under Calvinist double predestination, God determined the eternal destiny of every soul—elect or reprobate—before the dawn of creation. Because humanity's eternal destination was settled at the beginning of time, ecclesiastical intercession, papal decrees, and priestly indulgences were stripped of meaning: only God's sovereign decree mattered. However, eliminating Church mediation introduced an agonizing existential dilemma: how could any individual know whether they belonged to God's chosen elect? The theological resolution emerged through material prosperity: outward success and the accumulation of wealth came to be viewed as the definitive earthly evidence of divine favor.
```mermaid
flowchart LR
accTitle: Evolution of Capitalist Sovereign Debt
accDescr: Shift from Calvinist accumulation to Dutch market mechanisms and the institutionalization of the Bank of England.
subgraph Calvinist_Shift["Religious Shift"]
CP["Calvinist Predestination"] --> CA["Anxiety of Election"]
CA --> MA["Material Wealth as Proof of Grace"]
end
subgraph Dutch_Innovation["Market Creation"]
MA --> DR["Dutch Capital Accumulation<br/>(Equities, Stock Exchange)"]
end
subgraph British_System["Institutionalization"]
DR --> GR["1688 Glorious Revolution<br/>(Anglo-Dutch Union)"]
GR --> BOE["1694 Bank of England<br/>(Merchant Currency, Public Debt)"]
end
```
The mandate shifted from obedience to ecclesiastical hierarchy toward relentless private wealth accumulation. Rather than dispersing surplus among neighbors or donating it to the Church, believers hoarded and actively reinvested capital to generate further returns. This engine of reinvestment transformed the seventeenth-century Dutch Republic into the wealthiest society on earth, birthing the modern architecture of capitalism: public equity, formal stock exchanges, and advanced commercial banking. Yet the Dutch Republic faced severe geopolitical vulnerabilities, hemmed in by Catholic powers like the Habsburgs and the Vatican. The resolution came with the Glorious Revolution of 1688, an elite pact between English and Dutch nobilities that merged their interests and transferred the Dutch financial apparatus and physical bullion reserves to London.
In 1694, this financial arrangement was formally institutionalized with the chartering of the Bank of England. Historically, monarchs had funded wars by borrowing directly from private merchants—a perilous arrangement for creditors, because kings could die, lose wars, or unilaterally repudiate contracts. The Bank of England resolved this sovereign risk by transferring ownership of the central bank to private merchants while shifting the debt obligation from the individual monarch onto the English Parliament—and therefore onto the English population as a whole. Private merchants gained the exclusive authority to issue currency, backed by the public tax base. To justify this unprecedented mechanism, Enlightenment thinkers established the ideological doctrine of the absolute sanctity of private property—echoed in John Locke's formulation of fundamental rights to life, liberty, and property—alongside parliamentary democracy, securing broad compliance for a system where citizens borrow merchant-issued currency and repay it with interest.
- Calvinist double predestination shifted human incentives from communal redistribution to capital accumulation as proof of salvation.
- The Dutch Republic pioneered modern corporate finance, equities, and centralized exchange markets.
- The 1688 Glorious Revolution facilitated the structural transfer of Dutch capital and financial machinery to the British Isles.
- The chartering of the Bank of England in 1694 fundamentally restructured sovereign finance: merchants secured currency-issuing power, shifting repayment obligations from the crown to the citizenry through Parliament.
- John Locke's political philosophy regarding natural rights served to legitimize this emerging merchant credit infrastructure.
[27:36](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=1656s) The Explanatory Blind Spot: Calvinism and the Jewish Financier
The standard economic narrative explains how nation-states and modern transnational capitalism were forged: citizens were given a psychological and political ownership stake in their country so they would willingly march off to fight wars that served the interests of merchant elites. While conventional scholars broadly accept this framework, it leaves an enormous historical void. That model neatly explains Protestant behavior, but it completely fails to explain Jewish behavior, particularly the financial rise and worldview of dynasties like the Rothschilds.
Every rising capitalist class requires a guiding theology or philosophical operating system. Christian capitalists found theirs in Calvinism. Jewish capitalists obviously did not subscribe to Calvinist theology; instead, their parallel revolutionary worldview was Sabbatean-Frankism. The very same spirit of revolt that animated the Protestant Reformation across Christendom swept through the Jewish diaspora, following a shared historical logic of rebellion against entrenched religious authority.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: Parallel Capitalist Ideologies
accDescr: Flowchart illustrating how Christian and Jewish capitalists derived their ideologies from rebellions against traditional clerical authority.
subgraph ChristianPath["Christian World"]
C1["Revolt against Catholic Church Authority"] --> C2["Protestant Reformation"]
C2 --> C3["Calvinism"]
C3 --> C4["Transnational Capitalist System"]
end
[29:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=1783s) The Shared Mechanics of Religious Revolution and Normalization
The rise of these systems follows a consistent historical pattern rather than an intentional grand conspiracy:
- **Revolution against institutional hierarchy:** A direct uprising against entrenched, corrupt clerical power structures.
- **Systematization of the new creed:** Once the revolt succeeds, the movement codifies and systematizes its revolutionary ideas into an enduring ideological doctrine.
- **Accidental adaptation to crises:** Capitalism was never planned in advance; it emerged as an ad hoc, accidental response to a succession of acute historical crises. Sabbatean-Frankism developed through the exact same reactive mechanism.
- **Naturalization into everyday reality:** Over time, these once-radical frameworks become completely invisible—the very "air we breathe." In modern society, people instinctively accept counterintuitive ideas, such as pouring savings into the stock market and expecting wealth to grow automatically, as laws of nature.
In the same way, Sabbatean-Frankism originated as a virulent reaction against the perceived corruption of Rabbinic authority. It then systematized its doctrines until they thoroughly permeated the diaspora's financial elite. Today, it is no longer consciously debated among Jewish capitalists; it has simply merged into their cultural and operational reality.
[32:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=1968s) The Catholic Church Versus Protestantism: Three Core Schisms
To grasp the nature of the Sabbatean-Frankist revolution, one must first examine the three fundamental doctrinal rifts between the Roman Catholic Church and the Protestant Reformation:
1. **The Locus of Authority:**
The Roman Catholic Church asserted itself as God’s exclusive terrestrial proxy. Believers could not access God directly, nor were ordinary Catholics permitted to interpret the Bible themselves; spiritual truth was strictly mediated by the priesthood. The Protestant revolution upended this hierarchy, arguing that Scripture grants the individual direct, unmediated access to God, moving the locus of ultimate authority from the institution to the text.
2. **Eschatology (Amillennialism vs. Messianism):**
Catholicism is historically amillennial and anti-messianic. Under the Augustinian model, the Church operates outside temporal historical drama; Christ’s death birthed the Church, which now stewards the faith, meaning earthly perfection is not an active political project. Protestantism, having stripped away ecclesiastical finality, restored an urgent messianism. Because Christ’s promise to return remains unfulfilled, history is an open, unfolding story. Certain strands—premillennialists—even adopted the belief that human actions could actively force or accelerate his return.
3. **Mechanism of Justification:**
Catholic dogma maintained justification by works and outward obedience. Even if a person harbored inner hypocrisy, adherence to the institutional prescriptions and prescribed deeds offered salvation. Protestants rejected this as hollow moralism, establishing justification by faith alone (*sola fide*), insisting that the state of the internal heart before God is all that matters.
[36:55](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=2215s) Clarifying Millennialism: The Augustinian Stance
An audience member, Daniel, pauses the lecture to seek clarification regarding the exact boundary between amillennialism and messianism: whether messianism asserts that a savior brings a thousand years of peace, while amillennialism rejects that expectation.
The lecture clarifies the distinctions:
- **Premillennialism:** Christ returns prior to a literal thousand-year reign of earthly peace, which precedes the Final Judgment.
- **Postmillennialism:** The thousand years of peace occur first, followed by the Day of Judgment.
- **Amillennialism:** The prefix "a-" denotes an outright negation ("no millennium"). The Catholic Church holds that believers should not await an earthly millennial kingdom. Drawing on Saint Augustine, the Church defines its mission as fundamentally spiritual rather than temporal. It sits "out of history," dismissing worldly political timelines and radical millennial expectations.
[38:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=2305s) Rabbinic Authority Versus the Church: The Primacy of the Earthly Realm
Around the 15th and 16th centuries, the Jewish diaspora was governed entirely by Rabbinic authority, which differed radically from the spiritual paradigm of the Catholic Church.
The primary divergence lies in the distinction between spiritual and worldly focus:
- **The Christian / Catholic Perspective:** The material world is merely a fallen, temporary waystation. For Christians, the ultimate objective is the salvation of the soul, leaving the material sphere behind to dwell in heaven with Jesus. Across nearly every major world religion—including Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, and Christianity—earthly existence is treated as transitory.
- **The Rabbinic / Jewish Perspective:** Judaism stands uniquely apart by centering its theology squarely on the material world. The ultimate divine intent is not for human souls to evacuate earth to live in heaven, but for God to descend and dwell *here* among His chosen people. The Jewish people were created to sanctify and prepare this physical reality as a worthy earthly habitation for God—a vision epitomized by the construction of Solomon's Temple. Rather than escaping history, their mandate was to serve as a light unto the nations within the temporal world.
Where the Catholic Church anchored itself in transcendent, spiritual authority, Rabbinic governance was profoundly worldly, legalistic, and temporal.
[40:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=2423s) Structural Differences: Church Hierarchy vs. Rabbinic Diaspora
The structural mechanics of Christianity and Judaism diverge sharply in how authority and control are exercised. The Catholic Church operates as a rigid, centralized hierarchy where the Pope sits at the apex and bishops function essentially as regional popes. Within this Catholic framework, heresy is treated as an existential threat: deviation from papal authority results in swift violence and execution. In contrast, Judaism possesses no centralized pyramid or singular supreme figurehead. Dispersed throughout a global diaspora, the relatively small worldwide Jewish population developed tens of thousands of localized beliefs and communities, with autonomous rabbis serving as the primary figures of community authority.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: Comparison of Catholic and Rabbinic Authority Structures
accDescr: Contrasts Catholic hierarchical authority based on heaven and hell with Jewish diasporic authority based on Mosaic Law.
subgraph CatholicSystem["Catholic Church Hierarchy"]
direction TB
Pope["Pope (Supreme Authority)"] --> Bishops["Bishops (Regional Popes)"]
Bishops --> Flock["Flock / Laity"]
ControlCath["Instrument of Control: Heaven vs. Hell"] -.-> Flock
end
subgraph RabbinicSystem["Rabbinic Diaspora"]
direction TB
Diaspora["Dispersed Diaspora"] --> Rabbis["Autonomous Local Rabbis"]
Rabbis --> Communities["Local Jewish Communities"]
ControlJew["Instrument of Control: Mosaic Law / Halakha"] -.-> Communities
end
```
The instruments of social control deployed by each system differ as well. While the Catholic Church manages its flock through the metaphysical terror and promise of heaven and hell, traditional rabbinic authority operates through the mechanics of sin and the Mosaic Law (the Torah). Every Jewish individual is expected to avoid sin by strictly observing the Ten Commandments and adhering to the statutes delivered by Moses.
---
[42:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=2552s) The Theology of Sin and the Fall from Eden
Within Jewish theology, sin has a concrete, technical definition rooted in the narrative of Adam and Eve. In the Garden of Eden, humanity existed in total perfection and unity with God. Humanity’s betrayal of God's trust severed that communion, casting humanity out into a fallen state. Because humankind became so fundamentally prone to transgression, the Law of Moses was instituted as a remedial constraint to manage human waywardness.
The ultimate eschatological goal is redemption: once humanity atones for the fall from Eden, reconciliation with God occurs, and sin will cease to exist. Under this theological horizon, the Law of Moses is treated as temporary guidance meant for children. When the divine order is fully restored, God will cast away the Mosaic Law entirely, inaugurating a world where humanity is once again unified with the divine and fundamentally incapable of sinning.
---
[43:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=2632s) The Corrupt Compromise of Medieval Rabbinic Authority
Just as the Protestant Reformation and Calvinism arose in response to the corruption of the Catholic Church—which held massive sway over European nobility and possessed roughly 50% of the land—an analogous disruption struck the Jewish world through Sabbatean-Frankism. While the Catholic Church was corrupted by immense secular and geopolitical power, rabbinic authority was warped by the desperate need to survive under hostile Christian and Islamic rule.
Traditional Jewish eschatology holds that Jews are the chosen people tasked with ushering in the Messiah, who will redeem them and re-establish their union with God. However, openly preaching that a Jewish Messiah would soon arise to conquer the surrounding world would invite immediate slaughter from ruling Muslim or Christian authorities. To manage this existential threat, the rabbis struck a quiet survival compromise: they preached patience, teaching the flock that God has an inscrutable plan and that Jews must demonstrate worthiness strictly by observing the Law of Moses while passively waiting for the Messiah.
```mermaid
flowchart LR
accTitle: The Rabbinic Compromise and Its Repercussions
accDescr: Shows how rabbinic pacification to avoid conflict left European Jews marginalized and vulnerable to scapegoating.
A["Rabbinic Strategy: Wait for Messiah, obey Mosaic Law"] --> B["External Peace with Christian and Muslim Rulers"]
B --> C["Secular Vulnerability: Second-Class Status"]
C --> D["Denial of Land and Education; Servitude as Noble Managers"]
D --> E["Frequent Scapegoating (e.g., Black Death, Wars)"]
E --> F["Periodic Expulsions and Massacres"]
```
While this compromise preserved the rabbis' institutional authority, it came at the expense of ordinary Jewish communities:
- Jews were reduced to vulnerable second-class citizens across Europe, systematically denied higher education and the right to own land.
- Many were forced into precarious positions as middlemen, managing estates and collecting taxes for an indolent nobility.
- Whenever widespread crises hit Europe—such as the Black Death or regional wars—Jewish communities were inevitably scapegoated, expelled, or massacred.
---
[47:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=2841s) Sabbatai Zevi: The 1666 Messianic Revolution
The deep resentment against this submissive rabbinic accommodation set the stage for Sabbatai Zevi (Sabbatai Sevi). For an extended period, Jews had found an economic sanctuary in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, an expanding realm hungry for energetic talent and commercial capital. Hardworking and creative Jewish settlers prospered there, but their role as managers and tax collectors on behalf of the nobility created intense hostility among the local populace. This resentment exploded during the Cossack uprisings, leading to widespread massacres of Jewish populations.
Because Jewish tradition holds that the Messiah will appear in humanity's darkest hour, the 17th-century slaughters generated an intense messianic fervor across Europe. In 1666, Sabbatai Zevi openly proclaimed himself the long-awaited Messiah, rapidly drawing between a third and a half of the global Jewish diaspora into his movement.
- **Dismantling the Rabbinic Monopoly**: Zevi operated much like John Calvin, functioning as a theological revolutionary who identified the Law of Moses as the primary instrument of rabbinic control.
- **The Abolition of Sin**: Proclaiming that the messianic age had arrived and that God had forgiven the Jewish people, Zevi declared the concept of sin obsolete. The Mosaic Law was no longer binding.
- **Permission to Convert**: Zevi struck directly at the primary prohibition of the Ten Commandments—the ban against apostasy and idol worship. He argued that external conversion to Christianity or Islam was harmless because outward rituals no longer mattered so long as one's inner heart remained devoted to God.
- **Socio-Economic Liberation**: For many oppressed Jews, this theological shift offered an escape route: they could convert outwardly to access land ownership, civic security, and university education without fearing spiritual damnation, effectively eviscerating the institutional authority of the rabbinate.
---
[51:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=3102s) The Sultan's Ultimatum and the Mystery of Apostasy
Threatened with obsolescence, the rabbinic leadership moved against Zevi by reporting him to the Ottoman Sultan, the supreme sovereign over the territory where Zevi was operating. The rabbis warned the imperial court that a self-proclaimed Jewish Messiah intended to organize a rebellion and usurp the Ottoman throne.
When summoned, the Sultan confronted Zevi with an uncompromising ultimatum: prove his divine status by suffering execution, or don the turban and convert to Islam—"either the turban or your head." Rather than waging holy war against the Sultan as conventional messianic expectations demanded, Sabbatai Zevi chose conversion, taking the turban and becoming a Muslim.
While the rabbis celebrated Zevi's apostasy as definitive proof that he was a fraud, the event threw the diaspora into deep theological confusion. Under Zevi's antinomian doctrine, however, the conversion was entirely consistent: having declared humanity to be elevated beyond the category of sin, the Messiah was free from all external legal boundaries, and any outward act was justified because internal communion with God remained supreme.
[53:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=3186s) The Sabbatean Schism and Rabbinic Legalism
From the perspective of Sabbatai Zevi's messianic mission, outer religious forms were ultimately inconsequential: whether he converted to Islam or even to Christianity, "it shouldn't matter" because he was acting as the Messiah. The established rabbinate, however, weaponized his apostasy against him, instructing their communities that by converting to Islam, Zevi had committed the ultimate sin and therefore had to be excommunicated and ignored. This rift triggered an explosive schism across the Jewish world—effectively igniting an internal civil war that mirrored the upheaval Calvinism caused within Western Christendom.
An audience member intervenes to suggest that the rebellion was not merely against the original Mosaic law, but against the suffocating accretion of rabbinic enactments, such as dietary restrictions and cultural ordinances, which had become oppressive tools of clerical authority. Acknowledging the insight, the speaker distinguishes between the two primary sources of Jewish jurisprudence:
- The **Torah** (the written law)
- The **Talmud** (the oral law, comprising rabbinic interpretations and codifications)
Rabbis continually multiplied laws because legal monopoly was the direct engine of their social control. Sabbateanism arose as a radical grassroots revolt against this entrenched rabbinic corruption, setting the historical stage for the Frankist movement.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: The Sabbatean Schism Flow
accDescr: Diagram illustrating how rabbinic legal expansion triggered Sabbatean revolt and internal civil war.
subgraph RabbinicControl["Rabbinic Legal Monopoly"]
T["Torah (Written Law)"] --> TL["Talmud (Oral Law)"]
TL --> EXP["Proliferation of Dietary & Social Restrictions"]
EXP --> POW["Clerical Authority & Social Control"]
end
subgraph Revolt["Sabbatean Rebellion"]
POW -->|Backlash Against Corruption| SZ["Sabbatai Zevi Proclaimed Messiah"]
SZ -->|Apostasy / Conversion| SIN["Rabbis Condemn 'Ultimate Sin'"]
SIN --> SCHISM["Internal Schism & Civil War"]
SCHISM --> FRANK["Emergence of Frankism"]
end
```
---
[55:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=3314s) Hermetic Philosophy and the Occult Dimensions
To properly comprehend the theological underpinnings of this movement, one must examine Kabbalah and its deep roots in Hermetic philosophy. Throughout antiquity, belief in the occult was ubiquitous: everyday reality took for granted that angels, demons, and spirits—termed *jinn* in the Islamic tradition—actively inhabited human spaces, rendering the physical sphere merely a tiny fraction of total reality.
```mermaid
flowchart LR
accTitle: Transmission of Hermetic Thought
accDescr: Historical transmission line of Hermetic ideas from Egypt to Kabbalah.
A["Ancient Egypt (Hermeticism)"] --> B["Greece (Platonism)"]
B --> C["Christianity (Gnosticism)"]
C --> D["Judaism (Kabbalah / Zohar)"]
```
Hermeticism emerged from ancient Egypt, permeated classical Greek thought through Platonism, and entered Christian mysticism via Gnosticism. Its core axiom asserts that the visible material world is a pure illusion; the only fundamental realities are energy, vibration, and consciousness. From this foundational perspective arise several metaphysical principles:
- **Universal Vibration:** At the origin stands a singular Monad or Source that continuously breathes, emanates, and thinks. This cosmic emanation ripples across infinite dimensions until the vibration slows sufficiently to coalesce into tangible, visible matter.
- **Cosmic Rhythm and Pattern:** The cosmos operates according to cyclical movements and geometric rhythms, mirrored in celestial mechanics and astrology.
- **Multidimensional Correspondence:** Humans do not exist exclusively within physical bodies; they are composites of body, spirit, and soul existing simultaneously across varying planes. Because consciousness precedes physical embodiment, the Hermetic principle of cause and effect mandates mutual influence: an event in the physical body reverberates into the soul, while movements within the spirit directly transform the physical vessel.
While Judaism had historically remained exceptionally resilient against esoteric Hermetic currents due to its focus on worldly, legalistic existence, that immunity broke down entirely with the arrival of Kabbalah.
---
[58:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=3485s) Kabbalah: Reinterpreting Adam and Eve Through a Cosmic Lens
Kabbalah essentially mapped the Hebrew Bible and traditional Jewish faith through an esoteric Hermetic framework, transforming the Genesis narrative of Adam and Eve from a literal moral failing into a cosmic tragedy. In the standard biblical text, God places the first humans in the Garden of Eden with absolute freedom, imposing only a single prohibitive restriction: do not eat of the Tree of Knowledge. When they inevitably break that solitary rule, orthodox theology struggled to provide a coherent motive. Saint Augustine sought to resolve the paradox by asserting original sin—arguing that humanity is fashioned from dust, inherently prone to transgression, and therefore perpetually dependent on the church acting as a shepherd over fragile sheep.
Kabbalah rejects that pessimistic view. As codified in the 13th-century *Zohar*—attributed in modern scholarship to Moses de León—the Fall is interpreted as an existential failure of spiritual maturation. Humans were not merely acting out innate depravity; they lacked the spiritual capacity to comprehend the unearned bounty of God, choosing separation rather than true communion.
---
[59:53](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=3593s) Ein Sof, Adam Kadmon, and the Shattered Vessels of Creation
The Kabbalistic cosmogony begins with the *Ein Sof*—the boundless, infinite divine reality that encompasses both everything and nothing. To manifest something outside of His own absolute totality, the Infinite underwent *tzimtzum* (contraction or withdrawal into Himself), thereby fashioning a void or receptive space within which creation could occur. Through this opening, God emanated the primordial archetypal man, *Adam Kadmon*, expressing divine attributes through the Tree of Life and the ten *Sephirot*.
The fundamental spiritual tension of the universe lies between two opposing metaphysical forces:
- **The Divine Will to Bestow:** God is absolute benevolence, love, and giving, requiring an object upon which to pour His light.
- **The Human Will to Receive:** *Adam Kadmon* represents the creaturely ego and the desire to receive that divine emanation.
The breakdown occurs because the created being cannot handle unconditional benevolence. The speaker illustrates this through an everyday analogy:
> Imagine being invited to a friend's home for dinner, only to find the apartment overflowing with an extravagant, lavish ten-course banquet. Instead of feeling pure joy, the guest recoils in deep suspicion and panic—thinking, *"He wants to borrow money from me"*—and flees.
In precisely this manner, *Adam Kadmon* could not fathom God's unreserved generosity, mistook pure love for an overwhelming imposition, and turned away in spiritual embarrassment. Eating the forbidden fruit in Eden was merely the symbolic pretext Adam and Eve used to distance themselves from a divine love they were too immature to endure.
This refusal broke the world, shattering the divine harmony. Kabbalistic doctrine teaches that the overarching objective of creation is the return to God through self-redemption: by purging the selfish ego, humanity learns to receive divine love purely for the sake of bestowing it back.
This restoration is known as **Tikkun Olam** (the repairing of the world). An audience participant clarifies the classic Lurianic imagery: divine light was poured into finite vessels that proved incapable of holding the intensity and shattered, scattering holy sparks across material existence. In radical Kabbalistic streams, the Messiah is conceived not merely as a temporal ruler, but as a uniquely endowed spiritual catalyst destined to descend into the shattered fragments, gather the scattered sparks, and definitively reconstitute the cosmic vessel.
[01:04:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=3890s) The Broken Vessel, Scattered Sparks, and Sabbatai Zevi's Apostasy
Professor Jiang breaks down the theological mechanics of the Lurianic Kabbalistic concept of the "broken vessels" (*Shevirat ha-Kelim*) and the divine sparks (*Nitzotzot*). In this framework, the original cosmic vessel shattered, leaving divinity fractured and scattered across the material world. The defined task of the Messiah is to traverse the earth, collect these hidden sparks of light, and reassemble the vessel so that God may finally arrive. Acknowledging that interpretations vary widely, Jiang explains what he believes this concept signifies in practice: the premise that every Jewish individual inherently carries a divine spark, and that the shattering of the vessels corresponds directly to the historical dispersion of the Jewish people among gentiles across the globe—living amidst Muslims, Christians, Chinese, Japanese, and Africans.
Under this doctrine, the sparks of light have forgotten their original divine nature. The messianic mandate is therefore to track down every individual carrying a spark and return them to the faith, uniting them to achieve collective redemption and initiate the arrival of the divine. Jiang emphasizes that this worldview belongs to a "fringe minority" rather than mainstream Judaism, but asserts that it formed the core operating rationale for the 17th-century messianic claimant Sabbatai Zevi. From this perspective, Zevi’s shocking conversion to Islam was not an act of apostasy or abandonment, but an intentional descent into the Islamic sphere to extract the sparks trapped within that world:
> "It was not enough to save the Jews. He has to save every possible spark of light. And that's why Zevi had to convert."
- **The Broken Vessels doctrine:** The belief that divine light was fractured across creation, requiring deliberate gathering to restore wholeness.
- **The Role of the Diaspora:** Interpreted by Sabbatean theology as the scattering of latent sparks across every global civilization.
- **The Rationale for Zevi's Conversion:** Entering the Islamic world was framed as an esoteric rescue mission to gather hidden sparks that could not be reached through normative Judaism alone.
---
[01:07:16](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=4036s) Jacob Frank, Reincarnation, and Universal Infiltration
Following Sabbatai Zevi's death, the question remained: what should be done about the sparks stranded within the Christian world? Jiang introduces Jacob Frank, who claimed to be the direct reincarnation of Sabbatai Zevi. He notes that mystical Jewish tradition includes the concept of *gilgul* (reincarnation)—the ongoing cycle of souls returning to the earthly plane until the divine vessel is fully reconstructed and heaven is established on earth. Believing that Zevi began the process of universal redemption, Frank declared that it was his own duty to bring it to completion. He instructed his followers to systematically convert to and infiltrate other religions and movements, including Catholicism, Islam, Freemasonry, and the emerging movement of Hasidic Judaism, which Jiang compares to Protestantism in its emphasis on direct, joyful connection to God without ritual fear.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: The Sabbatean-Frankist Mission of Spiritual Infiltration
accDescr: Diagram illustrating the claimed reincarnation from Sabbatai Zevi to Jacob Frank and their movement into various religious spheres to gather hidden sparks.
subgraph Targets["Target Spheres of Infiltration"]
direction TB
C["Roman Catholicism"]
I["Islam"]
FM["Freemasonry"]
HJ["Hasidic Judaism"]
end
subgraph Objective["Cosmic Objective"]
SP["Locate Forgotten Sparks of Light"] --> RV["Reassemble the Vessel"] --> ED["Bring God to Earth / End of Days"]
end
JF --> Targets
Targets --> Objective
```
Central to Frankism was a radical reinterpretation of sin. Picking up Zevi's antinomian teachings, Frank taught that external ritual prohibitions—such as dietary laws against eating pork or outward apostasy—were inconsequential. Outward religious transgression could be disregarded because what truly mattered was the internal condition of the heart and the secret communion with God. When an audience member interjects to ask if the "meta mission" was ultimately to draw these converted souls back once the sins were completed, Jiang confirms that this internal restoration remained the ultimate goal of the doctrine.
- **Reincarnation of the Messiah:** Jacob Frank presented himself as the successor and reincarnated vessel of Sabbatai Zevi.
- **Strategic Apostasy:** Adherents were directed to infiltrate foreign faiths—Catholicism, Islam, Freemasonry, and Hasidism—to locate submerged divine sparks.
- **Sacred Transgression (Antinomianism):** External sins, including the violation of kosher laws and superficial apostasy, were neutralized and treated as necessary instruments for cosmic redemption.
---
[01:10:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=4206s) Capturing the Nobility: How Frankism Rationalized Elite Sin
Jiang explains how this theological framework enabled Frankism to breach and integrate into European ruling structures. When Frankists formally accepted Catholic baptism, European rulers—including Austro-Hungarian and Russian authorities who had long struggled with the "Jewish question"—welcomed them enthusiastically. While Jacob Frank remained an outcast within mainstream rabbinic Judaism, he was embraced by the European aristocracy, receiving aristocratic titles, a private castle, and his own armed militia. His followers steadily intermarried and assimilated into European high society and international finance, establishing a pedigree that Jiang asserts eventually touched major banking dynasties, citing the Rothschilds and modern figures like Jeffrey Epstein.
According to Jiang, Frankism served as the ultimate psychological and philosophical justification for powerful capitalists and rulers. Ascending to immense wealth and political power often demands ruthless, transgressive acts, which typically generate deep moral anxiety and guilt. Frankism provided an ideological shield: first, by teaching that "sin doesn't matter" because it is a vital tool for fulfilling God's work; and second, by framing the capacity to sin with impunity as a unique, divinely bestowed "superpower" given exclusively to individuals designated to expedite the End of Days.
- **Imperial Patronage:** Jacob Frank was granted noble standing, castles, and a private militia by European monarchs pleased by mass conversions.
- **Aristocratic Assimilation:** Frankist converts integrated directly into the European nobility and emerging international banking classes.
- **Theology of Absolution:** The Frankist ethos provided elites with a moral bypass, rationalizing ruthless acts as divinely sanctioned instruments necessary to achieve messianic redemption.
---
[01:12:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=4365s) Epstein Island and the Psychodynamics of Power vs. Love
Applying this framework to modern history, Jiang addresses the case of Jeffrey Epstein. He rejects the standard consensus that Epstein functioned primarily as a Mossad operative running a state-sponsored blackmail ring against the American political elite. Instead, Jiang argues that Epstein Island is better understood through the Frankist dynamic of elite power and its relationship with transgression. In the worldview of the ultra-rich, the capacity to transgress societal moral boundaries serves as an index of absolute power; yet supreme power inevitably collides with an existential crisis: the incompatibility between power and genuine love.
Jiang argues that extreme wealth and domination erode a person's capacity to love and trap them in perpetual paranoia, leaving them unable to tell whether anyone genuinely cares for them or is merely performing subservience for money. While a billionaire can easily acquire high-profile models or Hollywood stars, those relationships remain inherently transactional, calculating, and fraught with distrust. Jiang argues that Epstein designed his island operation as a mechanism to offer wealthy patrons an illusion of resolving this dilemma. By trafficking young, malleable girls—specifically between the ages of 14 and 17 who had little experience with men—the operation provided powerful men with victims who could be easily manipulated, groomed, and controlled into exhibiting the emotional submission and synthetic adoration that these lonely elites craved.
> "If you have a lot of power, first of all, it reduces your capacity to love, but also makes you wonder: who truly loves me? If you're a billionaire, everyone's nice to you. So how do you know who really likes you? It's a huge problem if you're a billionaire."
- **Rejection of the Mossad Narrative:** Jiang dismisses the idea that Epstein operated strictly as a foreign intelligence asset running a blackmail honeypot.
- **The Paradox of Absolute Power:** Immense power fosters intense isolation, paranoia, and an inability to experience genuine affection.
- **Exploitation and Control:** Jiang argues the targeting of victims aged 14 to 17 was driven by the desire of powerful men to exert total emotional and psychological control over vulnerable individuals who lacked the life experience to challenge them.
[01:16:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=4584s) Elite Psychology, Geopolitics, and Sabbatean-Frankist Eschatology
Professor Jiang addresses the hidden motivations of power elites, offering an alternative interpretation to standard conspiracy theories. While many assert that figures like Jeffrey Epstein operated purely as Mossad intelligence assets tasked with gathering blackmail material on politicians such as Bill Clinton, Jiang posits a more primal, personal psychology: elites often enter politics seeking power and control because they are profoundly lonely and starved for love. Under a perverse billionaire mindset, they operate under the illusion that accumulating absolute power will finally allow them to secure true love.
Jiang links this framework directly to contemporary geopolitics, arguing that Sabbatean-Frankist theology helps explain the ongoing actions of the Israeli state in Gaza and the broader Middle East. Despite generating global outrage through actions deemed genocidal, these moves are guided internally by an eschatological imperative to redeem and repair the world—a concept rooted in *Tikkun Olam* through radical disruption. Concluding this portion of his lecture, Jiang prepares the audience for a Q&A session, suggesting they group questions three at a time due to having a single microphone.
[01:18:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=4695s) Sex, the Body, and Sin in Kabbalistic Theology
An attendee named Thomas asks about sexual energy mastery, referencing the occult practices of Aleister Crowley alongside Eastern traditions like semen retention and Mantak Chia’s Taoist teachings. Realizing the centrality of the topic, Jiang opts to answer Thomas's question immediately rather than waiting for three queries. He explains that sex is a deeply misunderstood foundational concept within the Kabbalah, practiced intensely by figures like Sabbatai Zevi and Jacob Frank, who engaged in orgies and sexual promiscuity. In Frank’s case, his climb from peasant obscurity to elite patronage was facilitated by sharing his beautiful wife with European nobility.
Jiang draws a contrast between traditional Christian asceticism and Jewish theological perspectives regarding the physical body:
- **Christian / Aristotelian Tradition:** The physical body is typically viewed as fallen or sinful, while the spirit alone embodies divine purity; at the end of days, the physical body dissipates into pure spirit to worship God, and spiritual virtue lies in moderation.
- **Kabbalistic / Jewish Tradition:** The physical body itself is sanctified and made by God; upon the Day of Judgment, resurrected souls retain physical bodies precisely to experience worldly pleasures and sexual union.
- **Eschatological Metaphor:** Israel is figured as the bride and God as the groom; when the shattered divine sparks are collected and the cosmic vessel is reconstructed, God unites sexually with Israel.
```mermaid
flowchart LR
accTitle: Dialectical Path to Wisdom in Kabbalah
accDescr: Diagram showing the dialectical movement from thesis to antithesis through sin, ending in synthesis.
subgraph Dialectic ["Kabbalistic Dialectic"]
A["Thesis<br/>(Purity / Origin)"] --> B["Antithesis<br/>(Deep Sin & Darkness)"]
B --> C["Synthesis<br/>(True Divine Wisdom)"]
end
```
Jiang elaborates on the dialectical movement of the Kabbalah: thesis, antithesis, and synthesis. Unlike Aristotelian moderation, Kabbalistic doctrine posits that true wisdom requires plunging from one extreme into its opposite. Sin is actively utilized as an essential path toward enlightenment—descending entirely into darkness in order to break through into the light. This triadic generative movement, Jiang explains, mirrors the generative act of sex.
[01:23:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=4999s) Crowley’s Sex Magick, Reality Manifestation, and Syncretism
Turning to practice, Jiang reflects on why thousands of Orthodox and Hasidic Jewish men dedicate their entire lives solely to studying Torah and Kabbalah—such as the large Hasidic enclave in Montreal. Rather than working conventional jobs, their goal is to actively manifest God. Rooted in the belief that the body, soul, and spirit correspond directly with the cosmos, directed human consciousness holds the power to reshape physical reality itself.
Aleister Crowley integrated these Kabbalistic ideas directly into his sex magick ritual systems:
- **Consciousness Implantation:** Because reality’s core engine is generative and sexual, sexual union serves as the supreme vehicle for directing consciousness and implanting intent into the universe's fabric.
- **The Three Demands of Sex Magick:**
1. **Extreme Endurance:** The partners must sustain ritual intercourse continuously for three hours or longer.
2. **Retention:** The practitioner must refrain from ejaculation.
3. **Total Mental Synchronization:** Regardless of gender or orientation, both partners must focus entirely on a single identical thought or desired reality for hours.
Jiang emphasizes that ideas never exist in isolation; the Protestant Reformation reshaped European Judaism, which in turn reshaped Christian occultism. Through this historical syncretism, concepts interbreed like living sexual organisms, creating powerful intellectual forces that ultimately dictate reality. As Jiang concludes his response, the microphone passes to the next audience member, who begins a question referring to Jiang's past debate with Nick Fuentes.
[01:27:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=5243s) Audience Question: "What Is a Jew?" and the Fluidity of Identity
An audience member raises a question stemming from an earlier debate involving Sabbatean-Frankism, asking about the fundamental distinction between Jewish ethnicity and Judaism as a religion. The attendee notes that they had never really considered whether there is a true unbroken lineage or if historical identity is far more scattered and fluid, and how that dynamic factors into the day's discussion.
Professor Jiang responds by calling "What is a Jew?" perhaps "the most complicated question in history." While modern Jews often insist upon an unbroken 3,000-year continuity—claiming they are the exact same people practicing the exact same faith—scholars recognize that national identities, ethnicities, and religious practices evolve radically over time. The Jewish diaspora encompasses an enormous breadth of belief and lineage rather than a single monolithic core, and ancient Levantine religion bore little resemblance to contemporary Judaism.
[01:29:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=5348s) The Levant and the Emergence of the Israelites
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: Regional Geopolitics and the Rise of Israel
accDescription: Flowchart illustrating how the Late Bronze Age collapse weakened surrounding empires and allowed the polytheistic Israelites to coalesce in the Levant.
subgraph Transition ["Geopolitical Shift"]
BC["Late Bronze Age Collapse<br/>(11th–12th Century BCE)"]
end
subgraph LevantReg ["The Levant Crossroads"]
Hodgepodge["Diverse Peoples: Greeks, Canaanites, Egyptians, Hittites"]
Coalition["Biblical Narrative Built to Unify Groups"]
Israelites["Early Israelites: Polytheistic, Open, Elohim"]
end
Empires -->|"Imperial collapse recedes control"| BC
BC --> LevantReg
Hodgepodge --> Coalition --> Israelites
```
To explain the origin of Jewish identity, Professor Jiang reviews the geopolitical landscape of the Levant around 1000 BCE, traditionally viewed as the era of the Kingdom of David and the initial composition of biblical texts. The Levant served as the most strategically vital crossroads in human history because it connected three great imperial centers: Egypt (historically the wealthiest), Mesopotamia (home to the Sumerians and the most innovative), and Anatolia. These superpowers constantly contested the corridor until the Late Bronze Age collapse in the 11th and 12th centuries BCE decimated imperial reach.
In the power vacuum left along the imperial periphery, diverse migrant groups converged in the Levant, creating an ethnic mix comparable to modern immigrant hubs like Montreal:
- **Philistines:** Seafaring Greek migrants.
- **Canaanites:** Indigenous local populations.
- **Hittites:** Settlers arriving from Anatolia.
- **Egyptian Priests:** Factions expelled or banished following sectarian religious disputes over rival deities.
To bind this loose alliance of rival groups into an effective coalition, leaders constructed a unifying narrative—what is known today as the Hebrew Bible. The texts wove disparate regional origins into a collective ancestry: Abraham originated in Mesopotamia, later patriarchs came from regional locales, and Moses hailed from Egypt.
Crucially, early Israelites were open, progressive, and polytheistic, accommodating multiple traditions through a pantheon. Biblical texts preserved the plural Hebrew term for gods, *Elohim*, and archaeological evidence from early settlements confirms the active worship of Yahweh alongside deities such as Baal and Asherah.
[01:34:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=5690s) The Babylonian Exile, Persian Rule, and the Birth of Judaism
As imperial powers regained strength, they sought to reimpose control over the Levant. The Israelites resisted imperial domination, leading the neo-Babylonians to capture Jerusalem, destroy the First Temple, and deport the population in the Babylonian captivity and exile. Despite the temple's destruction, the exiled population retained their devotion to Jerusalem.
When Cyrus the Great and the Achaemenid Persian Empire overthrew Babylon, Persian imperial strategy adopted a divide-and-rule mechanism:
```mermaid
flowchart LR
accTitle: Transformation from Israelite Polytheism to Judaism
accDescription: Diagram showing the transition of Israelites under Persian rule into a monotheistic, segregated population.
A["Babylonian Exile<br/>(Temple Destroyed)"] --> B["Persian Conquest<br/>(Cyrus the Great)"]
B --> C["Imperial Policy:<br/>Divide and Rule"]
C --> D["The Birth of Judaism:<br/>Monotheism via Zoroastrianism"]
D --> E["Enforced Segregation &<br/>Racial Endogamy (Divorce Foreign Wives)"]
```
Cyrus permitted the exiles to return to the Levant on the condition of strict loyalty to the Persian crown, enforced by estranging them from neighboring regional populations. Influenced heavily by Persian Zoroastrianism, this reconstituted group abandoned polytheism for strict monotheism. To maintain political isolation and cohesion as a closed community, religious authorities enforced strict racial endogamy; Jewish men married to foreign women were ordered to divorce them, and intermarriage was prohibited.
An audience member interjects that this dynamic closely mirrors modern Israel—an amalgam of diverse global immigrants united by a singular nationalist idea and language. Jiang agrees, arguing that ancient Judea functioned as an imperial instrument to control the Levant just as the British Empire later sponsored modern Israel to sow discord across the oil-rich and trade-critical Middle East. Following the Persian era, Jewish society flourished until the arrival of the Hellenistic Greek empires, which prompted renewed assimilation and cultural mixing.
[01:38:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=5912s) The Hellenistic Invention of Jewish Memory and the Myth of Continuity
Professor Jiang contextualizes the evolution of Jewish identity by looking back to roughly 300 to 200 BCE, the era when scholars generally agree the Hebrew Bible reached its fully compiled form. He emphasizes that the biblical text was heavily shaped by Hellenistic culture. Even figures as central as Moses—whom many modern critical scholars do not view as a historical individual, but rather as an older cultural concept—were fully fleshed out and given literary life under the atmosphere of the Hellenistic world. Subsequent history kept transforming this identity: the arrival of the Romans brought the destruction of the Second Temple, inaugurated the worldwide Jewish diaspora, and forced the replacement of the sacrificial temple cult with rabbinic authority.
Despite these radical historical breaks, rabbinic tradition insists upon an unbroken thread of continuity. Jiang mocks this modern pastoral narrative, noting that if you ask a contemporary rabbi, you will hear claims like: "Well, you know, if you go back 2,000 years, if a Jew would translate 2,000 years back to the kingdom of David, that person would feel at home." Jiang flatly rejects this: "No, he won't. No. No. It's a completely different time, different period." Instead, what generates Jewish survival and cohesive power is not an unchanging way of life, but the text of the Bible itself. The scripture operates as an engine of collective memory, allowing an individual who reads it to feel an immediate, deeply personal bridge across thousands of years of human history.
[01:40:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=6009s) Historical Elites, Moral Guilt, and the Pre-Modern Equilibrium
An attendee in the audience raises a multi-part question regarding the macro-historical scale of the movement: looking back at the initial revolutionary break of Sabbatean-Frankism from traditional Judaism and its subsequent infiltration into the wider world, is the modern "Greater Israel" project the multi-generational end product of this ideology? Sensing multiple threads tangling together, Jiang asks the questioner to pause so they can take it one step at a time, framing his answer around a core premise: analysts spend far too much time tracking the physical migration of people, when the real force shaping human history is the movement and infection of ideas.
To illustrate how Sabbatean-Frankism revolutionized elite culture, Jiang outlines the historical baseline of political power. Throughout world history, ruling elites attained dominance through ruthlessness—by committing sins and setting aside moral scruples as a political superpower. Yet in the pre-modern Christian world, this created an agonizing internal contradiction. The Catholic Church stood as an institutional checkpoint that explicitly told rulers their actions were evil. Because kings and nobles feared eternal damnation, they lived under psychological restraint: they made confessions, purchased indulgences, bribed the Church, and repented on their deathbeds to make amends before they died. This institutional equilibrium kept elite depravity within recognizable boundaries for centuries.
[01:42:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=6152s) Redemption Through Sin: The Moses vs. David Theology
Sabbatean-Frankism shattered this equilibrium by introducing a radical theological inversion: the doctrine of redemption through sin. Under this philosophical model, transgression is not an obstacle to salvation; it is the indispensable prerequisite for it. One achieves redemption precisely by descending as deeply into sin as possible, hitting bottom, feeling remorse, and thereby returning to God. To justify this inversion, the movement weaponized the stark biblical contrast between the fates of Moses and King David.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: The Sabbatean Theological Inversion
accDescr: Comparison showing how Sabbatean-Frankism contrasts Moses and King David to justify transgression as the path to divine favor.
subgraph MoralLaw["Traditional Piety: Moses"]
M1["Righteousness & Obedience"] --> M2["40-80 Years of Sacrifice"]
M2 --> M3["Barred from Promised Land"]
M3 --> M4["God Keeps Distance"]
end
subgraph Transgression["Sabbatean Model: King David"]
D1["Adultery with Bathsheba & Murder of Uriah"] --> D2["Rebuked by Nathan & Child Dies"]
D2 --> D3["Profound Grief & Repentance"]
D3 --> D4["Intimate Bond: 'Beloved of God'"]
end
```
Jiang lays out the dramatic contrast: Moses was pure, loyal, and committed his entire life to shepherding the Israelites through forty to eighty grueling years in the wilderness. Yet for all his sacrifice, when Moses begged God for the single wish to cross over and die in the Promised Land, God denied him: "Nope, you're not getting that... I don't care how much sacrifice you made. I don't care how hard you worked... You're not setting foot in the promised land." By contrast, King David was an unapologetic transgressor. Seeing Bathsheba bathing, he exercised royal privilege to sleep with her, got her pregnant, and solved the scandal by arranging the deliberate battlefield murder of her husband, Uriah.
When the prophet Nathan confronted David on God's behalf, David initially felt little remorse. Only when God struck down David's firstborn child did the king plunge into grief and mourning. Crucially, it was out of this very depth of suffering and mourning that the closest, most intimate relationship between God and David was forged. The theological lesson derived by the Sabbatean-Frankists was intoxicating:
- Moses followed every divine command and remained held at arm's length.
- David committed adultery and murder, and emerged as God's most beloved favorite.
- The foundational doctrine became clear: to experience genuine divine reconciliation, one must first sin with abandon.
[01:46:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=6383s) Ideological Infection: Conquering the Elites, the Vatican, and Freemasonry
When this antinomian doctrine encountered the ruling class, it offered the ultimate psychological liberation. Instead of suffering under the Catholic Church's moral guilt, power-hungry elites were handed an intellectual rationale that told them: "Wait a minute. Now I don't have to feel bad for being an asshole. I'll just keep on being an asshole." Under this mindset, any future punishment or tragedy was reinterpreted not as damnation, but as the necessary crucible that would turn them into God's "best friends."
Jiang stresses that elite actors do not need to understand the formal history of Sabbatean-Frankism, nor do they need to know the names of Sabbatai Zevi or Jacob Frank, to be utterly possessed by the ideology. Once stripped of ethical shame, the ruling classes were able to pursue naked power without internal constraint. Because the doctrine so perfectly catered to the predatory instincts of ruling elites, it quietly captured and subverted existing institutional strongholds across Europe:
- The hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church and the Vatican
- The secret networks of Continental Freemasonry
- Hasidic Judaism and traditional rabbinic communities
- The secular aristocracy and political dynasties
[01:47:47](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=6467s) Ideas as Viral Organisms and the "Greater Israel" End Game
Addressing the audience member's question about the Kabbalistic mission—the return to the source and the liberation of the divine sparks—Jiang explains that ideas are living biological organisms that behave like viruses. When an individual adopts an appealing idea, like the moral license to sin without guilt, they do not merely adopt an isolated philosophical excuse; they unknowingly ingest an entire metaphysical ecosystem.
Bundled within the Sabbatean-Frankist ideological payload is the Kabbalistic narrative of the end of history: the cosmic reunion of God with His chosen people and the physical reconstitution of Israel. Even if modern institutional elites privately view the theological details as absurd or do not share the messianic end game, the viral infection leaves them philosophically compliant. Having internalized the premise of the system, secular and non-Jewish elites instinctively sympathize with the project and step aside. Consequently, the realization of radical historical agendas does not require a vast, conscious conspiracy; it requires only a fanatical, dedicated minority driving toward the goal, backed by a broader ruling class whose moral defenses have been systematically disarmed.
[01:49:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=6570s) Memetic Transmission and the Collective Unconscious
Professor Jiang elaborates on his theory of ideological transmission, framing concepts as living organisms or "viruses" that alter perception once they take root in an individual. In his view, when a belief system frames transgression or sin as necessary to bring about an ultimate end, adherents feel an internal compulsion to act upon that narrative. An audience member follows up by asking whether elite adherence to Sabbatean-Frankism and geopolitical goals—such as the "Greater Israel Project"—stems from a conscious, generational conspiracy where core tenets are intentionally remembered and passed down.
Jiang firmly rejects the idea of a conscious cabal. He insists that figures among the elite are not sitting in rooms explicitly identifying themselves as Frankists or consciously coordinating geopolitical projects under that banner. Instead, he argues that human history is propelled by ideas rather than individuals, asserting that humans function essentially as unconscious vessels carrying out ideological currents. According to Jiang, historical circumstances allowed Frankist concepts to settle into the collective unconscious, which he claims accounts for what he characterizes as guilt-free or shameless behavior among the powerful.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: Jiang's Framework of Unconscious Ideological Influence
accDescr: Flowchart contrasting conscious conspiracy with Jiang's model of environmental ideological transmission.
subgraph Conscious["Conscious Conspiracy Model (Rejected by Jiang)"]
A["Explicit Secret Society / Club"] --> B["Deliberate Planning & Labels"]
B --> C["Coordinated Geopolitical Execution"]
end
subgraph Unconscious["Environmental / Memetic Model (Proposed by Jiang)"]
D["Historical Ideas as 'Organisms'"] --> E["Embedding in Collective Unconscious"]
E --> F["Cultural Environment ('Air You Breathe')"]
F --> G["Unconscious Behavior & Elite Actions"]
end
```
To clarify how influence operates without deliberate awareness, Jiang uses an analogy of urban air quality:
- "It's the air you breathe," he explains, pointing out that residents of Montreal breathe air shaped by local factories and trees without actively managing or thinking about the specific chemical elements entering their bodies.
- He claims that even if one directly asks elite figures—including Jewish elites—about Sabbatean-Frankism, they will report having never heard of it, because the ideology operates at the level of ambient culture rather than overt instruction.
---
[01:53:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=6820s) Audience Inquiry on Occult Phenomena and Secret Societies
The discussion shifts when another attendee brings the focus back to comments Jiang made earlier in the lecture regarding the occult and anomalous personal experiences. The attendee poses a hypothetical scenario: if an individual were to encounter what they perceived to be supernatural phenomena—such as observing nature behaving in unprecedented ways, experiencing unusual surges of energy, or facing persistent insomnia—how should they respond?
The questioner notes the societal risks of speaking openly about such experiences, referencing Jiang's earlier comment that people attempting to disclose unusual perceptions might face institutional confinement or censorship. Given those hazards, the attendee asks whether such an individual would be driven to join an established secret society—noting that historical orders were ostensibly founded by people trying to navigate similar events—or if they would feel compelled to establish an entirely new group, especially if existing societies are believed to be compromised. Finally, the attendee asks whether Jiang's public lectures and content creation are his own method for navigating these issues.
- The attendee asks specifically: "Would you join a secret society because they were created from those people having those experiences... or would you make your own secret society yourself because you can't trust the ones around you now?"
- Jiang asks the attendee to clarify and restate the question before offering a personal response.
---
[01:56:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=6962s) Personal Claims of Prophetic Intuition and Institutional Avoidance
Responding to the attendee, Jiang recounts his transition from private life to internet prominence. He explains that for most of his life he viewed himself as an ordinary person working as a high school teacher with two children. He describes experiencing vivid intuitive impressions or "visions" concerning geopolitical outcomes, stating that he foresaw the Russian invasion of Ukraine and a second presidential term for Donald Trump. Seeking supplemental income to support his growing family, he launched his YouTube channel with the thought that internet visibility might provide financial relief, though he notes that managing unexpected public notoriety in reality proved very different from his initial plans.
Addressing his perceived vulnerability, Jiang claims that openly proving predictive or prophetic capacities carries severe risks, including the fear of government abduction, scientific experimentation, or co-optation by esoteric groups. To shield himself from external leverage, he explains that he made the deliberate choice to forgo platform monetization entirely. He notes that despite having nearly three million subscribers and videos that regularly draw millions of long-form views, he has walked away from an estimated $2 million to $4 million in ad revenue to avoid becoming indebted to corporate or institutional gatekeepers.
Jiang illustrates this stance by recounting an offer from a major global publishing house offering a $150,000 advance for a debut book. While acknowledging that an elite publishing contract would grant entry into prestigious social and academic circuits—such as speaking invitations at Yale and Harvard or appearances on major television networks—he ultimately declined the deal when the publisher requested that he publicly recant certain statements he had made online. Jiang describes this demand as an initiation mechanism designed to compromise his autonomy, concluding that remaining unaligned is his only safeguard against institutional co-optation.
[01:59:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=7191s) Preserving the Visions and Resisting Co-optation
Professor Jiang explains why he takes deliberate, uncompromising measures to prevent being co-opted by institutional power, beginning with his steadfast refusal to monetize his YouTube channel. By demonstrating that he cannot be bought, he shields himself from elite leverage, noting that the moment someone decides money is their primary objective, "they have you." If an oligarch offered him an enormous sum, his response would simply be to tell them to take their "$2 million and like shove it up your ass." He realized early on that his predictive insights and historical visions are granted to him precisely because they stem from a sincere desire to educate the public and share truth freely. Were he to pivot toward launching an elite private consultancy to sell these visions behind closed doors to the ultra-wealthy, he believes the gift would vanish instantly, reducing him to an ordinary mouthpiece peddling propaganda.
To maintain his intuitive access, Jiang relies on open, unscripted public lectures, describing each gathering as an act of genuine "co-creation" between his intuition and the audience's curiosity. Rather than delivering a rehearsed script from a rigid outline, these interactions function as an open portal where speaker and listeners explore truth collectively. He sustains his creative energy by traveling internationally, learning directly from local cultures, and drawing inspiration from the people he encounters. Anchoring this entire lifestyle is a steadfast dedication to his domestic life; regardless of public recognition or fame, his paramount duty remains the emotional, physical, and spiritual safety of his children.
- **Non-Monetization Principle:** Turning down advertising revenue on YouTube serves as a public declaration that he cannot be bribed or pressured by financial gatekeepers.
- **Consultancy Temptation:** Monetizing visions for private high-net-worth clients would destroy his access to insight and reduce him to an elite propagandist.
- **Co-Creative Format:** Meetups operate without strict scripts, functioning as spontaneous collective portals into historical and spiritual inquiry.
- **Family Priority:** Personal grounding and spiritual protection rely fundamentally on keeping his children happy, healthy, and insulated from fame.
---
[02:02:53](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=7373s) Divine Protection, Channeling, and Angels
An audience member asks whether Jiang's experiences might not be entirely self-generated, questioning whether his visions could stem from a supernatural source beyond his personal identity—effectively asking if he might be an unconscious channel or subject to a form of benign possession. Jiang accepts the premise without hesitation, observing that even if he is merely a conduit for a higher agency, the practical imperative remains unchanged. In his view, a transcendent force selects a human vessel because of how that individual lives and carries themselves; therefore, he must diligently maintain his integrity and lifestyle to sustain that connection and convey the intended message.
Jiang reflects on his sense of everyday safety, sharing that he often feels actively guarded by unseen spiritual allies. He moves through the world and delivers provocative lectures without anxiety because he genuinely believes he is shielded by angels. By anchoring himself solely to the truth rather than succumbing to fear, intimidation, or self-preservation, he feels liberated from concerns over elite retaliation, concluding simply that while he could theoretically be mistaken, his lived experience reassures him that higher protective forces have his back.
---
[02:04:35](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=7475s) Spiritual Warfare, Kabbalah, and Rescuing Childhood
An audience member poses a hypothetical question: could an individual endowed with a creative spark or inner light study and practice the Kabbalah to construct an alternative society or counter-cult, specifically designed to dismantle existing secret societies and abolish the manipulative financial systems turning the public into mindless "NPCs"? Jiang firmly rejects confronting the elite on their chosen battlefield. Because the established oligarchy derives its worldly power from transgression and moral degradation—a dynamic Jiang terms the "superpower of sin"—anyone attempting to counter them through equivalent conspiratorial mechanics will inevitably be sucked into sin themselves, falling under the sway of dark spiritual forces akin to the corrupting lure of the Dark Side in *Star Wars*.
Direct destruction of the system is not his calling; his mission centers strictly on research, education, and clear communication. To overcome elite dominion, one cannot mirror their tactics; one must summon entirely different spiritual currents grounded in love, radical openness, generosity, and creative imagination. Jiang argues that constructing an alternative social fabric requires focusing entirely on the next generation. Observing his own three children, he reflects that while their physical forms belong to this world, their consciousness originates elsewhere. The modern institutional world, he argues, is fundamentally pathological and hostile to children—confining innately curious explorers to desks for eight hours a day and chemically drugging those who cannot sit still. The only meaningful counter-strategy is creating family-centric ecosystems that actively safeguard the innocence and imagination of the young.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: Paths of Spiritual Influence and Counter-Strategy
accDescr: Comparison showing how direct confrontation leads to corruption through sin versus building family ecosystems grounded in love.
subgraph CorruptPath ["The Elite Paradigm: Power Through Sin"]
A["Secret Societies & Financial Control"] --> B["Superpower of Sin"]
B --> C["Direct Confrontation"]
C --> D["Moral Compromise & Spiritual Corruption"]
end
subgraph LightPath ["The Regenerative Alternative: Love & Childhood"]
E["Spiritual Forces: Love, Generosity & Wonder"] --> F["Alternative Family Ecosystems"]
F --> G["Preserve Innocence & Curiosity"]
G --> H["Renewal of Human Consciousness"]
end
```
- **The Danger of Counter-Cults:** Emulating occult organizational structures or using subversion inevitably binds the practitioner to the same dark forces governing the establishment.
- **The True Counter-Force:** Spiritual power capable of dissolving elite systems is summoned exclusively through warmth, transparency, charity, and open inquiry.
- **Institutional Hostility Toward Youth:** Standard schooling is criticized for suppressing exploration, enforcing eight-hour physical confinement, and medicating normal childhood energy under the guise of care.
- **Family-Based Sanctuaries:** The most effective resistance consists of parents uniting to cultivate protective spaces that keep children's innate creative faculties uncorrupted.
---
[02:08:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=7729s) Freemasonry, Deism, and the AI Temple of Reason
When an attendee asks how the elite's modern drive toward Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) intersects with Sabbatean-Frankism—and whether tech elites view AGI as an artificial deity—Jiang traces the historical genealogy of this ambition back to the infiltration of Freemasonry by Sabbatean-Frankist networks. While the Kabbalah permeated Masonic lodges in the eighteenth century, it merged with the foundational Masonic philosophy of deism. In the Masonic worldview, the universe is governed by an indifferent Grand Architect who created humanity with the distinct assignment of perfecting the cosmos using mathematics, sacred geometry, and cold, unyielding reason.
Masonic thought adapted the Jewish mystical longing for the reconstruction of the Holy Temple, reimagining it as a symbolic, universal "temple of reason" where the divine presence might finally dwell among men. To construct this edifice, however, human nature itself had to be radically transformed. Jiang explains that the elite view organic humanity as fundamentally flawed—excessively loud, emotional, stubborn, and opinionated. To become suitable building blocks, individuals must be reshaped through state schooling, media conditioning, and cultural pressures into uniform, smooth "cubes of reason," systematically stripped of emotion, familial ties, regional prejudice, and traditional heritage. Jiang notes that modern meritocratic universities like Harvard, Yale (his alma mater), and McGill have executed this conditioning with remarkable precision, churning out credentialed graduates whose intellectual habits and speech patterns are virtually identical.
- **Masonic Infiltration:** Frankist ideas merged into Western Freemasonry, whose members played foundational roles in designing modern secular institutions and the American republic.
- **Deistic Imperative:** Masonic deism holds that God is aloof and detached, tasking human reason and geometry with bringing order and ultimate perfection to an incomplete world.
- **The "Cube of Reason":** The ideological blueprint demands stripping raw humans of sentiment, family loyalty, and ancestral tradition until they resemble uniform ashlar stones.
- **Elite Higher Education:** Prestigious meritocratic universities function as processing centers designed to eliminate ideological friction, shaping students into interchangeable, highly standardized thinkers.
[02:11:47](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=7907s) AI, Neuralink, and the Construction of an "AI God"
Addressing the psychological architecture of modern technocrats, Professor Jiang observes that these figures are fundamentally unimaginative, operating with cold, calculating minds that "think like computers." The structural challenge confronting the elite is that such individuals constitute only a narrow minority of the human population. To overcome this limitation, the system aims to make everyone think like a computer by effectively transforming human beings into computing nodes through artificial intelligence. Technologies like Siri and ChatGPT are aggressively pushed into everyday life not because they are inherently superior—Jiang bluntly points out that "they're not any good"—but to train the public away from independent inquiry and accustom them to guided algorithmic outputs.
The ultimate trajectory of this paradigm is biological integration via brain-computer interfaces like Neuralink. Under the guise of eliminating negative human traits such as prejudice, emotional volatility, and hatred in favor of an engineered state of "pure love," human cognition is placed under continuous external surveillance and algorithmic management. When an audience member asks whether tech elites believe Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) will literally become a divine entity, Jiang dismisses the idea that computer scientists believe they can program a supernatural deity into existence. Instead, the mechanism is inverted: by subjugating humanity to a comprehensive digital surveillance grid where every thought is directed and regulated by an AI apparatus, that AI becomes, for all functional and practical purposes, an artificial god.
- **The Function of AI Assistants:** Tools like Siri and ChatGPT serve as behavioral nudges designed to steer public thought processes toward standardized algorithmic patterns rather than open exploration.
- **Neuralink and Cognitive Monitoring:** Implantation of neural interfaces represents the end goal of turning humans into biological computers, ensuring emotional neutralization and total behavioral predictability.
- **The Operational Definition of an "AI God":** AGI achieves godlike status not through mystical transcendence, but through total operational control over an entirely surveilled, compliant human populace.
---
[02:14:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=8047s) The US-Canada Imperial Clash and the Rise of Mark Carney
Shifting gears to contemporary geopolitics, an attendee asks whether the themes of the lecture connect to the ongoing United States–Canada trade war. Jiang reframes the dispute, asserting that the conflict is not an ordinary commercial squabble, but a proxy struggle between two competing imperial powers: the American Empire and the British Empire. Because Donald Trump operates under the premise that the entire Western Hemisphere belongs within the sovereign sphere of the United States, direct tension is inevitable with Canada, which Jiang describes as a subordinate colony tied to the financial and political power of the City of London.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: Imperial Struggle Over Canadian Sovereignty
accDescr: Diagram showing the geopolitical tension between the American Empire and the British Empire over Canadian control.
subgraph Empires["Competing Imperial Interests"]
US["American Empire<br/>(Donald Trump / Hemispheric Monroe Doctrine)"]
UK["British Empire<br/>(City of London Financial Interests)"]
end
subgraph Canada["Canadian Battleground"]
Gov["Canadian State Power<br/>(Mark Carney Consolidation)"]
end
US -.->|"Contests Sovereignty"| Gov
UK -->|"Directs / Influences"| Gov
```
Because the fundamental question at stake is sovereignty—whether Canada will submit to Washington or answer to London—Jiang warns there is no diplomatic resolution to the trade war. Instead, he directs attention to the domestic consolidation of power under Mark Carney, whom he describes as methodically assembling the authority of a dictator on behalf of City of London interests. Jiang argues that while Donald Trump had to secure popular votes, Carney orchestrated a succession that bypassed genuine democratic friction: other Liberal leadership contenders stepped aside, Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre politically "self-destructed" during the general campaign, and Carney subsequently began peeling off Conservative MPs through inducements to bolster his caucus. Pointing to investigative reports from the *Toronto Star*, Jiang emphasizes that traditional cabinet ministers are being bypassed entirely while a tight executive inner circle unilaterally dictates national policy.
---
[02:16:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=8194s) Satanism vs. Frankist Theology: Husks and Sparks of Light
The discussion deepens when an audience member draws parallels between institutional corruption, ritual child sacrifice (citing ancient deities like Baal and Molech), the United Nations, and apocalyptic prophecies in the Book of Revelation concerning a one-world beast system where individuals cannot buy or sell without a mark. The questioner asks whether these phenomena point to an overt evil force, such as a literal "great Satan," operating behind globalist agencies and secret societies.
Jiang responds by clarifying the distinction between vernacular conspiracy theories and predictive historical analysis. While conceptualizing the ruling elite as literal Luciferians or Satanists can have practical explanatory value for the general public—helping people grasp the sheer scale and trajectory of systemic malevolence—it flattens how billionaires and oligarchs actually view themselves. The elite do not practice cartoonish devil worship, nor do they identify with public organizations like the Church of Satan, which Jiang dismisses as provocative internet-era trolls or lunatic fringe groups. Rather, elite conduct is governed by the esoteric theological framework of Sabbatean-Frankism.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: Frankist Anthropological Hierarchy
accDescr: The Frankist distinction between beings carrying divine sparks and the soulless masses viewed as husks.
subgraph Metaphysics["Frankist View of Humanity"]
A["Global Population"] --> B["Bearers of the 'Sparks of Light'"]
A --> C["The Uninitiated Masses"]
B --> D["Sacred Elite<br/>(Entitled to transgress moral boundaries)"]
C --> E["Husks / Qliphoth<br/>(Mere animal bodies without divine interiority)"]
end
E --> F["Total Exploitation & Commodification"]
```
Under Frankist metaphysics, moral boundaries are dissolved by a stark anthropological division. Only individuals who carry the divine "sparks of light" are granted status as real human beings. The overwhelming majority of humanity is viewed as devoid of divine light—mere "husks" (*qliphoth*), soulless bodies, and beasts. Because an animal possesses no intrinsic moral sanctity, the elite feel entirely unconstrained by traditional prohibitions against exploitation, commodification, and harm. Jiang connects this doctrine directly to illicit networks and systemic abuses, such as the Pakistani grooming gang scandals in Britain, arguing that such operations ultimately exist and are protected to supply physical bodies to meet the covert demands of the ruling hierarchy.
---
[02:21:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=8487s) Raising Children Through Non-Compliance
Prompted by Jiang's grim analysis of elite predatory practices, an attendee asks how parents can protect, educate, and raise their children within an increasingly hostile societal structure.
Jiang delivers a direct and uncompromising prescription: survival demands absolute non-compliance. He argues that conforming to mainstream governmental mandates or standard social expectations guarantees disaster for families. In particular, he urges parents to withdraw their children entirely from the institutional schooling system. In Jiang's assessment, state schools serve primarily as enforcement hubs designed to condition young minds for obedience, monitor domestic thought patterns, implement medical mandates, and indoctrinate children to the point where they are systematically alienated and turned against their own parents.
- **Non-Compliance as Survival:** Submitting to state expectations leaves individuals exposed to systematic exploitation; civil and institutional refusal is presented as the only viable defense.
- **De-Schooling as a Necessity:** Institutional education is characterized not as a place of learning, but as an apparatus for enforcing compliance, monitoring ideological conformity, and severing family bonds.
[02:22:36](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=8556s) Compliance in Bureaucracy and the Critique of Schooling
Professor Jiang opens with a critique of modern institutional structures, arguing that bureaucracies, law enforcement, and school systems are fundamentally designed to process compliant individuals rather than manage non-compliant ones. To illustrate this dynamic, he points to child welfare bureaucracies, claiming that caseworkers disproportionately handle minor household disagreements and "soft cases" rather than intervening in severe, painful instances of abuse, such as households destabilized by severe alcoholism. In his view, institutional actors prioritize manageable compliance over difficult interventions. Consequently, he warns that greater personal compliance merely invites deeper bureaucratic overreach: "the more compliant you are, the more you'll be bullied by the system."
As a direct countermeasure, Jiang advises parents against enrolling their children in traditional schools, stating that he homeschools his own children. He identifies the formal educational system as the primary societal vector responsible for conditioning populations into reflexive obedience.
[02:23:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=8636s) Natural Learning versus Institutional Curricula
An audience member follows up by asking Jiang what he actually teaches his children if they do not attend school. Jiang bluntly answers, "I don't teach them anything," describing how his son spends time playing on an iPad or roaming freely with family in the woods. He argues that children possess innately powerful pattern-recognition faculties and function as natural "learning machines" capable of teaching themselves skills such as reading simply by engaging directly with books, provided they are granted autonomy and love.
Drawing on his background working in education, Jiang dismisses standardized curricula—specifically citing the Canadian public school framework—as an unnecessary and counterproductive waste of time. He maintains that institutional schooling actively sabotages a child's intrinsic capacity for deep focus and independent curiosity:
> "The way you do that is by giving them autonomy, by giving them love, by supporting them. And the way you destroy that is through schooling, through tests, through too much screen time, through too much compliance. School's the worst thing you can do for your kids."
[02:25:59](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=8759s) Power Hierarchies and the Contradiction of Democracy
The discussion shifts when an attendee revisits Jiang's earlier lecture remarks concerning elite networks associated with Jeffrey Epstein. The attendee asks why high-status figures would prey on vulnerable young people aged 14 to 17 rather than forming mutual, wealth-building partnerships with peer billionaires, while also asking whether elites risk political exposure and public backlash—pointing to controversies surrounding the Epstein files or political maneuvers involving TikTok. Jiang rejects the premise of cooperative equality, asking, "Who's in control? Who's the boss?" He insists that hierarchical power admits only one dominant figure rather than a balanced partnership.
When the questioner presses whether public opinion presents a serious obstacle to elite agendas, Jiang dismisses the political relevance of the general public, asserting that popular majorities do not dictate outcomes. He characterizes representative democracy as an ideological construct developed to legitimize the national debt structures established alongside the Bank of England. Jiang argues there is an irreconcilable conflict between genuine democratic will and the constitutional protection of private property:
* **The Property vs. Democracy Conflict:** Jiang posits that even if 100% of the Canadian public voted to redistribute property equally to eliminate economic disparity, the judicial branch would immediately invalidate the measure as unconstitutional.
* **The Primacy of Law:** In his formulation, constitutional frameworks are explicitly constructed to protect private property rights above popular sovereignty, exposing democratic consensus as an administrative facade.
[02:29:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=8980s) Sabbatean-Frankism, Spiritual Entities, and Institutional "Lobotomies"
Another audience member questions the underlying logic of Sabbatean-Frankism discussed earlier in the lecture, expressing confusion over why a movement seeking to elevate divine "sparks" would pursue deliberate transgression and sin rather than virtuous deeds. The speaker asks whether these behaviors stem from an interaction with non-human, other-dimensional intelligences, referencing author Robert Monroe's concept of "loosh"—an alleged emotional energy harvested by non-physical entities.
Jiang responds by sharing his belief that the universe contains infinite dimensions inhabited by conscious entities, claiming that ruling elites possess occult methods for tapping into these forces. According to Jiang, modern institutions enforce strict materialist science and academic schooling—institutions he claims to know intimately from his own studies at Yale University—to sever ordinary people from higher awareness and keep them subservient to administrative elites. He characterizes compulsory schooling as a spiritual and intellectual operation akin to a "lobotomy" that systematically disconnects children from non-material realities.
A final attendee adds that institutional schooling severs the emotional bond of love between parents and children. The attendee concludes that the only viable path for ordinary people is to reclaim their personal "spark" and channel inner anxiety into a constructive superpower.
[02:33:38](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=9218s) Vessels of Love, Free Will, and the Rules of Spiritual Warfare
An audience member reflects on how individuals can overcome systemic anxiety by opening themselves up as vessels for beauty and love. By allowing love to fill oneself, one naturally becomes attractive to others, turning everyday human connection into a vehicle for channeling extradimensional, spiritual forces within an institutionalized, dark world. Professor Jiang praises this reflection as "beautiful" and expands on the mechanics of the unseen world. Spiritual beings are engaged in active cosmic warfare, but that warfare is governed by strict, inviolable rules—chief among them being the preservation of human free will. Demons cannot arbitrarily tamper with an individual who chooses to align with or worship angels. An individual can only fall under demonic dominion by willingly signing a contract with a demon and subsequently breaking it; nobody can ever be forced to make a pact with Satan.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: The Divergence of Spiritual Will
accDescr: Diagram illustrating human free will choosing between demonic contract or divine channeling.
subgraph Choice["Human Free Will"]
A["Individual Agency & Choice"]
end
subgraph Demonic["The Sabbatean-Frankist Path"]
B["Pursuit of Power, Fame & Money"]
C["Contract with Demonic Entities"]
D["Psychopathy & Dissociation"]
end
subgraph Divine["The Path of the Spark"]
E["Love, Openness & Imagination"]
F["Channeling Powerful Angels"]
G["Recognition as a 'Spark of Light'"]
end
A -->|"Materialist Ambition"| B
B --> C
C --> D
A -->|"Conscious Agency"| E
E --> F
F --> G
```
Jiang emphasizes that life presents a fundamental spiritual crossroad: one can pursue raw worldly power, fame, and money—which binds an individual into the Sabbatean-Frankist current—or one can cultivate openness, generosity, love, and imagination, thereby channeling powerful angelic forces that actively assist throughout life. Another attendee connects this to Jiang’s recorded readings on Dante, asking whether humanity is currently trapped in a "time of shades," surrounded by non-player characters (NPCs) who lack the divine spark, and whether taking loving agency is the only method to navigate the underworld. Jiang confirms this, noting an esoteric tenet of Sabbatean-Frankism: the sect actively searches for genuine "sparks of light." When an individual demonstrates true independent light—by asking rigorous questions, expressing original creativity, and proving a willingness to die for their core convictions—the dark forces recognize that spark and will not interfere with them.
[02:37:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=9421s) "The Object," Urban Distortion, and Protecting the Spark in Children
An attendee struggles to articulate a persistent metaphysical dilemma: whether intellectualizing these issues keeps people trapped inside "the object" (the material reality and its matrix of control). The participant describes an intuitive counter-movement centered on raising one's vibrational frequency and elevating consciousness to become immune to material manipulation. They point directly to the surrounding urban environment in Montreal, citing low-altitude aircraft, constant surveillance helicopters, unnaturally loud modified vehicle mufflers rattling the streets, and deliberately neglected city infrastructure as physical symptoms of an engineered rollout for Agenda 2030. The attendee voices profound concern over how parents can realistically shield their children from imminent societal control mechanisms, such as microchipping and compulsory state schooling, while existing under constant sensory bombardment.
Before answering, Jiang pauses to confirm the logistics of the event space with the organizer, Stella, checking the clock (noting it is approximately ten minutes to five, with the room reserved until 7:00 PM). Turning back to the question, he draws directly on Dante's framework of "the will and the desire." The fundamental barrier to liberation is societal conditioning that convinces human beings they are insignificant and powerless in the grand cosmic scheme. The journey begins with the absolute internal conviction that one's existence and choices matter:
> "If you recognize in yourself that I matter and I have the power and the free will to live a life whatever I want... then all solutions will come to you. The problem is... we've been brainwashed to think that we don't matter, that we're not sparks of light, that whatever we do doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things."
Jiang highlights that one of the system’s primary weapons is the early separation of children from their parents through formal schooling and institutionalization. This deliberate fracture instills lifelong, chronic separation anxiety in the child while constantly weaponizing fear in the parents, who live in perpetual dread over their children's safety. Reclaiming autonomy requires parents to transcend this fear, anchor themselves in unconditional love for their children regardless of social expectations, and live a deliberate life of consequence, beauty, and truth.
[02:41:36](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=9696s) The Metaphysics of Sin: Psychopathy, Dissociation, and the Forest Analogy
A participant asks Jiang to clarify the broader metaphysical architecture of good and evil within his framework. If committing sin provides ruthless actors with an inherent worldly advantage—catapulting them into elite positions because they operate unburdened by moral consequences—what does "the good" actually represent? The attendee questions whether Jiang subscribes to a singular divine source like the Monad, God, or Christ, or whether cosmic reality consists of infinite opposing dimensions where good and evil merely act as balancing forces against predatory tactics.
Jiang clarifies that the ruling elites who sin are not necessarily making ordinary moral evaluations; rather, they are biologically and psychologically hardwired to sin without internal friction:
* **The Pathology of Sin**: Elite operators are functional psychopaths who feel zero regret or moral remorse for destructive actions.
* **The Alcoholism Analogy**: Most normal people who overconsume alcohol experience nausea, illness, and next-day regret. True alcoholics experience an inverted response—drinking more fuels their energy and perceived happiness without normal biological self-regulation. Similarly, ordinary people suffer debilitating guilt and anxiety when they violate moral codes, whereas psychopaths operate completely unencumbered by conscience.
* **Trauma-Induced Dissociation**: To replicate this ruthlessness across dynasties, Sabbatean-Frankists deliberately engineer severe childhood dissociation through ritualized generational trauma, specifically practicing ritual incest. By emotionally shattering children at an early age, they produce dissociated adults incapable of feeling empathy, creating cold, hyper-effective stewards of elite power.
To contextualize why such predatory archetypes exist in the universe, Jiang introduces the analogy of a natural forest ecosystem containing predators like wolves and lions alongside rabbits and birds. Every creature occupies a specific, functional purpose within the broader cosmic order, rather than existing purely as an arbitrary moral aberration.
[02:44:47](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=9887s) The Ecosystem of Human Society: Wolves, Elites, and Inner Consciousness
Professor Jiang illustrates the dynamic between the rulers and the ruled by using an ecological metaphor about the balance of nature. When people look at a forest and decide that "the wolves are mean, so let's kill all the wolves," the immediate result is the total destruction of the forest's natural equilibrium, triggering a cascade of unforeseen problems. Human society operates under a similar design: everyone is born for a specific purpose and reason. While people often conclude that the ruling elite are fundamentally evil and must be overthrown, Jiang questions where that impulse ever actually leads.
Instead of obsessing over external rulers, Jiang argues that the true purpose of human existence is to elevate consciousness, to discover aspects of oneself that cannot be learned anywhere else, and to live one's life to the absolute best of one's ability. No outside power can block an individual from pursuing that path. The elite are not preventing anyone from living a fulfilling, happy life; rather, individuals prevent themselves from doing so. Jiang urges the audience to stop fixating on the elite altogether, pointing out that wolves will always remain wolves and will inevitably continue to commit sin. The only meaningful response is to turn inward, cultivate generosity and kindness toward the people immediately around oneself, and allow that shift in consciousness to transform the surrounding universe.
[02:46:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=9968s) Prophecy, Spiritual Warfare, and Choosing to Be a Spark of Light
An audience member draws a parallel between Jiang's previous comments about retreating to the family and an ancient Buddhist dialogue: two thousand years ago, the King of Evil boasted that his followers would infiltrate and occupy the temples at the end of the world, to which the Buddha replied that it would not matter, because his own followers would simply return to the home and family. The attendee connects this to Chinese prophecies spanning over a millennium that accurately foretell the removal of billions of people. Accepting this grim reality feels like watching a scripted movie unfold, where competing spiritual forces clash using the "virus of ideas" to determine who survives. The attendee asks why the remnants at the end of the world matter so much to these spiritual forces.
Jiang frames existence as an enduring spiritual struggle between light and darkness, good and evil, with constant shifts in momentum. He warns against getting lost in the macro-level superstructure of this conflict, noting that these cosmic forces play out over thousands or millions of years and operate entirely beyond individual human control. Trying to manage the grand narrative is futile; the only meaningful task is to live the best life possible in the present moment. Jiang emphasizes that everyone faces a stark personal choice: either become a "spark of light" by recognizing that one's life and immediate actions matter, or adopt the mindset of a powerless "NPC" who believes that because the cosmic war is vast and uncontrollable, nothing one does matters at all.
[02:49:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=10159s) Changing the System from Within vs. The Flydubai Incident
Two audience members present interrelated inquiries. The first attendee—who drove six hours across the border to attend the Montreal meetup—asks about the recent Flydubai hijacking incident. He questions the official narrative, pointing out how convenient the details appeared: two off-duty pilots sitting behind the cockpit, a steep nose dive that should have produced fatal G-forces but miraculously did not, a stabbing, and a plane full of Israeli passengers. He asks whether it was an elite false-flag operation designed to fuel an "us versus them" election narrative. Immediately following, a second attendee asks whether game theory allows one to change a corrupt system from within by climbing the ladder to influence policy, keeping one's head down to protect the family, or exiting the system entirely at high personal risk.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: System Change vs Self Transformation
accDescr: Diagram contrasting the illusion of changing a system from within against inner personal transformation.
subgraph Trap["The External Illusion"]
A["Attempting to change the system from within"]
B["Climbing the institutional ladder"]
C["Adopting elite methods while claiming different morals"]
A --> B --> C
end
subgraph Reality["The Internal Shift"]
D["Inner self-transformation"]
E["'Be the change yourself'"]
F["Detachment from elite narratives"]
D --> E --> F
end
C -.->|"Leads to delusion"| Trap
```
Jiang tackles the systemic question first, bluntly rejecting the premise: "There is no such thing as changing the system from within. You can only change from within." Trying to change the system from the inside is merely a subconscious rationalization for wanting to become like the elite while pretending otherwise. Jiang advises people to stop entertaining that delusion and instead focus solely on being the change themselves. Turning to the Flydubai hijacking, Jiang ties the incident back to the core tenets of Sabbatean-Frankism and Kabbalistic ideology:
- **The Sabbatean-Frankist Mindset**: Believing that only the chosen elect matter, and whatever narrative serves their agenda is deemed valid.
- **Narrative Over Physical Reality**: While experienced commercial pilots pointed out that the flight dynamics and official story defied physics, that does not mean nothing happened on board; rather, a minor event was likely exaggerated by Israeli media and exploited by politicians to unite the domestic public.
- **Transgression and Redemption**: Within Frankism, worldly public opinion is irrelevant. What counts is radical internal cohesion and fulfilling God's perceived will. The sin and the lie are merely mechanical steps required to attain the ultimate redemption, because only the final result matters.
[02:54:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=10446s) Desert Migrations and the Historical Syncretism of Islam
An attendee raises an article titled "The Zionist Origins of Islam," which claims that during the Byzantine-Sasanian conflicts around 620 AD, an Ebionite Jewish leader identified with Muhammad sought to rebuild the Temple in Jerusalem in anticipation of the Second Coming of Jesus; when that messianic return failed to materialize, the movement retreated into the Arabian desert toward Mecca and Medina. The attendee asks whether this theory aligns with Jiang's historical understanding of the region.
Jiang contextualizes the emergence of Islam by highlighting the volatile, war-torn landscape of the ancient Middle East. During the successive Jewish-Roman wars, Roman legions carried out brutal massacres across Judea, displacing substantial segments of the Jewish population. Seeking refuge, many Jewish communities fled deep into the Arabian desert—a landscape Roman armies avoided because "Romans don't like sand." Over generations of exile in the desert, these Jewish populations lived alongside native Arab tribes and actively shared their theological frameworks. In doing so, they embedded foundational concepts like strict monotheism and the arrival of the Messiah directly into the Arab cultural fabric, leading to a natural religious syncretism as disparate desert communities coalesced.
[02:55:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=10549s) The Messianic Spark: Byzantines, Sasanians, and the Rise of Islam
Even while the Arabian tribes remained largely pagan, core tenets of the Jewish religion—specifically the anticipation of the Messiah and apocalyptic beliefs about the end of the world—began to seep into their culture. The pivotal turning point occurred during the devastating war between the Byzantine Empire and the Sasanian Persian Empire. As the conflict raged, vast waves of refugees fled into the Arabian desert. At the same time, Jewish populations aligned themselves with the Persians, and backed by Sasanian military might, they succeeded in capturing Jerusalem. However, the city was heavily Christian at the time, prompting local Christians to appeal directly to Byzantine Emperor Heraclius for intervention. Heraclius dispatched a massive imperial army to relieve Jerusalem, unleashing brutal reprisals that resulted in the slaughter of Jewish communities across the Levant.
In Jewish theological tradition, the light appears in the darkest times; the Messiah emerges precisely when all earthly hope seems extinguished. This intense environment of persecution birthed an urgent messianic expectation. Out of several potential candidates, Muhammad emerged as the figure who captivated the imaginations of both Arabs and Jews. Presenting himself as a messianic figure, Muhammad offered an unmediated, direct connection to God. This powerful spiritual promise energized Arab and Jewish tribes to fight side by side. Facing Byzantine and Sasanian empires weakened by chronic corruption and mutual exhaustion, their combined forces rapidly swept across the Levant. Following Muhammad's death, fierce internal power struggles erupted, leading later Islamic rulers to actively erase this shared history in order to obscure the faith's early Jewish origins.
- **Geopolitical Conflict**: The great clash between the Byzantine Empire under Emperor Heraclius and the Sasanian Persian Empire destabilized the region, driving displaced populations into the Arabian desert.
- **Jerusalem's Fall and Retaking**: Persian-allied Jews briefly took control of Christian-occupied Jerusalem before Heraclius sent an army to retake the city, precipitating widespread massacres of Jews throughout the Levant.
- **Messianic Synthesis**: Muhammad emerged during this acute crisis, uniting Arab and Jewish followers under the promise of a direct connection to God and exploiting the fragility of the two imperial superpowers.
- **Historical Revisionism**: The subsequent succession crises and political consolidations intentionally scrubbed historical traces of Islam's early Jewish entanglements.
---
[02:58:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=10690s) The University for Prophets: Shifting from Entrepreneurs to Charismatic Visionaries
An audience member asks about a provocative concept Professor Jiang previously floated on various podcasts: the founding of an unconventional "school for prophets." Acknowledging that he initially proposed the idea half in jest, Jiang explains that it reflects what he sees as humanity's long-term civilizational trajectory: a transition from the "age of entrepreneurs" to an "age of prophets." In past decades, visionary figures like Steve Jobs operated within the market economy, yet Jobs was fundamentally a prophet who simply happened to generate immense wealth through storytelling, personal charisma, and a messianic drive. As the social environment shifts, Jiang expects cultural energy to migrate away from conventional business building and toward prophetic, spiritual, and ideological movements.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: Transition from Entrepreneurs to Prophets
accDescr: Flowchart illustrating humanity's shift from business entrepreneurship to prophetic movements and civilizational splintering.
subgraph Past ["The Passing Age"]
E["Age of Entrepreneurs"]
SJ["Market Visionaries<br/>(e.g., Steve Jobs)"]
E --> SJ
end
subgraph Shift ["Civilizational Inflection"]
SJ -->|"Cultural Energy Migrates"| P["Age of Prophets"]
end
subgraph Future ["Emerging Archetypes"]
P --> F1["Charismatic Influencers<br/>(Fuentes, Sneako, Tate, Rogan)"]
P --> F2["Corporate Sovereignty<br/>(Network States)"]
P --> F3["New Spiritual &<br/>Ideological Cults"]
end
```
To understand this emerging landscape, Jiang actively studies and interacts with prominent online figures who command devoted followings, including Nick Fuentes, Sneako, Andrew Tate, and Joe Rogan. He notes that these individuals possess immense energy and an innate ability to present visions that fire the imaginations of their audiences. Jiang highlights his friendship with Sneako, praising his genuine curiosity and moral backbone for forfeiting millions of dollars in potential revenue by strictly refusing to promote gambling sponsors. Turning to Andrew Tate, Jiang observes that Tate's legal battles are viewed by his followers through the lens of unjust persecution and martyrdom. While mainstream critics dismiss Tate as a creep who deserves punishment, his base sees an innocent man under siege by hostile institutions. Jiang predicts Tate will likely serve a few years, negotiate a deal, and emerge with even greater influence. Rather than attempting to indoctrinate these figures, Jiang envisions his university as a hub that equips future prophets with intellectual and strategic tools to realize their visions, thereby positioning himself at the center of humanity's next cultural epoch.
- **Civilizational Archetype Shift**: Economic entrepreneurship is yielding cultural dominance to charismatic prophecy, mirroring historical transitions following imperial exhaustion.
- **High-Profile Subjects**: Figures like Nick Fuentes, Sneako, Andrew Tate, and Joe Rogan are analyzed as prototypes of the coming prophetic class due to their mass engagement and alternative distribution networks.
- **Sneako's Principles**: Commended for forgoing lucrative gambling sponsorships worth millions of dollars out of personal conviction.
- **Andrew Tate's Legal Saga**: Interpreted as an archetype of persecution and modern martyrdom, positioning him to exit incarceration with heightened loyalty from his followers.
- **Institutional Objective**: The planned institution does not seek to control dogma, but to provide prospective prophetic leaders with the strategic infrastructure, historical grounding, and organizational tools needed to maximize their impact.
---
[03:02:20](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=10940s) Spiritual Resets, Network States, and Montreal's Intellectual Spirit
Addressing questions on everyday spirituality, Jiang discusses the role of domestic animals. While frequent relocation currently prevents his family from owning a dog, he emphasizes his desire for his children to grow up around animals, explaining that animals channel the divine in everyday life. The conversation then turns to the broader concept of civilizational "resets." Drawing historical parallels to the Late Bronze Age collapse, Jiang outlines a cosmological view in which the universe is driven by a perpetual clash of competing spiritual forces. When a single force—such as Sabbateanism—becomes overwhelmingly dominant and unbalances reality, the system inevitably collapses, echoing the fall of the Tower of Babel. Rather than a linear transition from one cohesive world order to another, Jiang argues that the modern world is fracturing into a radically splintered, multipolar reality.
In this fragmenting world, multiple experimental governing structures will emerge concurrently. Corporate-led entities like the "network state," advocated by figures such as Peter Thiel, could see tech giants like Google or Meta establishing privatized, sovereign corporate territories. Simultaneously, charismatic prophets and local warlords will carve out personal domains, spawning new religions and ideological enclaves. Concluding his remarks, Jiang explicitly rejects passive religious traditions—such as certain Buddhist or Hindu tendencies—that advise renouncing the physical world as an irredeemable pit of sin while passively awaiting the next life. Instead, he insists that human relevance is proven through active struggle: "we're here to find a light even in darkness," engaging directly as actors rather than mere observers. Closing out the meetup, Jiang expresses deep gratitude to organizers Stella and Sophia and praises the audience, remarking that despite Montreal's local problems, its vibrant intellectual community makes it far more engaging and stimulating than Toronto before inviting everyone to share food and mingle.
- **Spiritual Role of Animals**: Jiang views household pets not merely as companions, but as grounded conduits channeling divine energy into family life.
- **The Mechanics of Civilizational Resets**: Civilizations reset when metaphysical forces tilt into excess, triggering catastrophic rebalancing events comparable to the Bronze Age collapse or the Tower of Babel.
- **The Fractured Future**:
- *Network States*: Corporate-governed enclaves where multinational companies like Google or Meta wield sovereign power.
- *Prophetic Warlordism*: Charismatic personalities amassing devout followings to establish localized cultural or political fiefdoms.
- *Radical Multipolarity*: The fragmentation of single global superpowers into competing ideological and spiritual factions.
- **Philosophy of Active Engagement**: Direct repudiation of quietist asceticism; human dignity requires actively confronting corruption and fighting to extract light from dark circumstances.
- **Event Conclusion**: Sincere acknowledgment of organizers Stella and Sophia, a warm reflection on Montreal's superior intellectual depth compared to Toronto, and an invitation to enjoy food together.
[03:06:53](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyUl1QerHjA&t=11213s) Concluding Remarks and Mingling
Professor Jiang brings the Montreal meetup to a close, encouraging the attendees in the room to take the remaining time to mingle, talk, and "get to know each other." Signing off warmly with the audience, he bids everyone farewell until the next gathering: "And I'll see you guys next time. Okay. Okay."
## Video description
In this Saturday, October 3, 2026 lecture, Professor Jiang explains how Sabbatean-Frankism conquered the world.
Professor Jiang argues that modern ruling elites derive institutional supremacy from the willingness to transgress moral boundaries without remorse, finding psychological justification in Sabbatean-Frankist theology. Under this framework, Jiang posits that the capacity to commit sin is weaponized as a worldly superpower and rationalized as an esoteric instrument of cosmic redemption.
Transgression as an Engine of Elite Power (14:12)
Jiang posits that the willingness to lie, cheat, and breach moral boundaries functions as an immense worldly superpower, enabling ruthless actors to climb corporate and bureaucratic hierarchies far faster than peers constrained by ethical scruples. Citing artificial intelligence executives like Sam Altman alongside figures like Peter Thiel, Jiang argues that ascending to extreme status strips away conventional moral hesitation. However, this sudden worldly elevation inevitably produces deep existential anxiety, acute loneliness, and a pervasive fear of institutional subjugation.
To manage this cosmic isolation, empowered individuals form defensive alliances that crystallize into secret societies. According to Jiang, elite psychology is characterized by an agonizing need to rationalize extraordinary influence. Lacking ordinary moral frameworks to justify their predatory success, rising elites gravitate toward occult or antinomian doctrines that alleviate guilt and affirm their self-perception as transcendent outliers.
Sabbatean-Frankism and Liberation from Sin (47:21)
To explain the ideological architecture of elite transgression, Jiang examines the 17th-century messianic revolution of Sabbatai Zevi and its 18th-century evolution under Jacob Frank. Rooted in Lurianic Kabbalah, the movement held that primordial cosmic vessels shattered (Shevirat ha-Kelim), scattering divine sparks (Nitzotzot) throughout the material world. Zevi claimed that the messianic age had arrived, rendering the Law of Moses obsolete and abolishing sin. Under this antinomian theology, transgressive acts—including Zevi's 1666 apostasy to Islam—were reinterpreted as necessary descents into darkness to liberate hidden divine light.
Jacob Frank extended this doctrine into European high society, accepting Catholic baptism while retaining an esoteric antinomian core. Jiang argues that while Max Weber identified Calvinist predestination as the ideological engine of Protestant capitalism, Sabbatean-Frankism served as a parallel revolutionary theology for rising Jewish financiers. Frankism provided an ideological shield that taught that sin did not matter, recasting ruthless behavior as a divinely sanctioned duty that granted elite adherents aristocratic titles, wealth, and institutional protection.
Guilt Elimination and Subversion of Institutions (106:23)
Jiang asserts that Sabbatean-Frankist ideas conquered European institutions not through a conscious, generational cabal, but by acting as an ideological virus that infected the collective unconscious of ruling elites. In the pre-modern Christian order, monarchs and nobles were constrained by Catholic teachings on eternal damnation, compelling them to moderate their behavior through confession, penance, and deathbed restitution. Frankism dissolved this psychological checkpoint by convincing elites that ruthlessness made them divine collaborators, quietly subverting power centers including the Vatican, Continental Freemasonry, and dynastic banking families.
Applying this thesis to contemporary scandals, Jiang rejects the premise that Jeffrey Epstein functioned primarily as a state-sponsored intelligence asset. Instead, he interprets Epstein's network through the Frankist dynamic of power and moral transgression. In Jiang's assessment, supreme wealth erodes the capacity for genuine human connection and induces chronic paranoia; Epstein exploited this psychological vulnerability by trafficking young, malleable girls to provide oligarchs with a manufactured illusion of affection and absolute control.
Institutional Compliance and the Prophetic Era (142:36)
Jiang critiques modern state bureaucracies and standardized education as institutional sorting mechanisms designed to condition populations into reflexive obedience. Describing compulsory schooling as an intellectual and spiritual operation akin to a lobotomy, Jiang argues that formal curricula sever children from intuitive awareness and intrinsic focus. He advocates for unschooling and direct parental mentorship, asserting that attempting to reform corrupted systems from within is a self-defeating trap, whereas true resistance requires withdrawal into autonomous personal development and family cohesion.
Looking at civilizational trajectories, Jiang forecasts a macro-historical shift from the 'age of entrepreneurs' to an 'age of prophets.' While past decades rewarded commercial visionaries like Steve Jobs who operated through market mechanisms, Jiang claims cultural momentum is now transferring to charismatic, messianic figures who mobilize ideological and spiritual movements outside the boundaries of conventional institutions.
Jiang's argument rests heavily on an unconventional synthesis of Lurianic Kabbalah, psychological speculation regarding modern oligarchs, and personal spiritual intuition. By rejecting materialist analysis and traditional conspiracy narratives in favor of memetic and occult forces, the lecture leaves unresolved how to empirically separate Frankist ideological transmission from standard institutional psychopathy.
Original transcript
[0:00] Uh first of all, I I want to thank
[0:02] Stella and Sophia because um it is a lot
[0:05] of work to put these events together and
[0:08] uh I think today is just going to be a
[0:12] marvelous event. Uh Stella actually uh
[0:15] we and I first met in New York City,
[0:17] right? She actually flew down from Monte
[0:19] to New York City. So I want to thank you
[0:20] for that.
[0:21] >> From Italy. I flew from Italy.
[0:22] >> You flew from Italy. Oh my god. So um
[0:26] yeah. So thank you so much for for your
[0:28] commitment. and and help uh Stella. And
[0:31] I want to thank you guys from coming uh
[0:34] all this way. Uh do we have any people
[0:36] from outside of Montreal? How I I know
[0:40] Daniel S came from Chicago. Um and so
[0:44] thanks so much. Uh if you are out of out
[0:47] of from from uh out of town and you guys
[0:52] um um have come a long way. Um actually,
[0:57] you know what? Sorry. Sorry. Sorry. Um I
[1:00] I need to start over. Okay. Because my
[1:01] son is here and sorry I I I I need to uh
[1:06] Sorry.
[1:11] This is an iPad to keep him busy. Sorry.
[1:12] Sorry. So we we we need to start over.
[1:14] Okay. Here you go. So welcome um
[1:17] everyone. This is our Montreal meetup.
[1:21] And first of all, I would like to thank
[1:23] Stella and her niece Sophia for
[1:26] organizing such a marvelous event. It
[1:29] really is a lot of work to put these
[1:30] events together. And I think that today
[1:32] is going to be a really um nice event.
[1:36] This is actually my first time in
[1:39] Montreal. Um and it's a very special
[1:42] city. First of all, I got I got
[1:45] recognized a lot in Montreal, about as
[1:48] much as New York City. But for a reason,
[1:51] people don't ask me for my picture. And
[1:54] I don't know why why that is. Uh this
[1:57] morning, I went to a breakfast place to
[2:00] get my son and myself some breakfast.
[2:03] The owner recognized me and gave us um a
[2:06] free breakfast. And I was thinking
[2:08] myself, wow, this is one nice thing
[2:10] about being famous. Um I was in New York
[2:11] City and the owner there gave gave us
[2:13] free pizza. I'm like, okay, being famous
[2:16] means I no longer have to starve. Um if
[2:19] I run out of money, I'll just go to a
[2:21] restaurant and know someone recognizes
[2:22] me and give me gives me free food. Okay.
[2:25] So um today's lecture is on 17
[2:30] frankincom. Okay. The nature of evil and
[2:35] sin in this world. And today's lecture
[2:38] is going to be different from other
[2:40] lectures I've done in the past because
[2:43] um today's lecture I'm going to ask you
[2:46] guys to use your imagination a lot.
[2:48] Okay. We're going to try to get into the
[2:50] minds of the people who run this world
[2:54] to understand the psychology and to
[2:57] better understand why they do what they
[3:00] do their behavior. All right. So we're
[3:02] going to start with a thought
[3:03] experiment. Let's just say uh you go
[3:07] you're back in high school and you go on
[3:10] a science field trip to a laboratory and
[3:13] you're with your um classmates and then
[3:17] for the reason a radioactive spider
[3:21] escapes from the lab and bites you.
[3:26] You feel kind of sick. So you ask to go
[3:29] home and you sleep it off. Okay. The
[3:33] next morning you get up and you feel
[3:35] very different. You feel stronger. You
[3:39] feel lighter. You feel faster when you
[3:42] jump. You can jump up to the ceiling. In
[3:45] fact, you find that you have a desire to
[3:49] touch the wall and climb the wall. And
[3:51] so you climb up the building. When you
[3:54] run, you run really fast. You find that
[3:57] it's easy for you to lift things like a
[4:00] car. You just lift the car and it's um
[4:02] so you have super strength, you have
[4:04] supervision, you can um climb
[4:09] and at first you're excited
[4:13] and so maybe you join the basketball
[4:16] team and you become a star player. Um
[4:19] and but after a while, after a few
[4:23] months,
[4:24] this excitement
[4:26] actually comes anxiety.
[4:31] Because you are special,
[4:34] but you don't know why you're special.
[4:38] Why is it that there are 8 billion
[4:40] people in this world, but you're
[4:44] different from everyone else? And you
[4:48] can logically explain it. You can like,
[4:50] well, I was on a field trip and I got
[4:54] bitten by a radioactive spider and so
[4:57] that's what happened. Okay. But the
[5:00] explanation is not complete.
[5:04] You have to believe that it was not just
[5:07] a radio after spider. Maybe it was a
[5:11] spiritual force, God or a demon. You
[5:15] don't know. Okay? But something
[5:18] powerful chose you and it causes anxiety
[5:22] in you. You want to know what's really
[5:26] going on. Okay? You want to know what
[5:28] the truth of the universe is. And we
[5:31] call this the occult.
[5:34] Okay. So when you have a special power,
[5:38] yes, for the first few months, for the
[5:39] first few years, you enjoy it. But
[5:42] eventually this excitement
[5:44] leads to anxiety. You can't sleep. You
[5:49] can't you you can't help but fear fear
[5:52] feel fear and anxiety. Okay? You want to
[5:55] know what the truth of the universe is.
[5:57] You want to know who gave you this power
[5:59] and why this person gave you this power.
[6:02] So you study a cult. Okay? You want to
[6:04] ask yourself, are you the Messiah? Okay.
[6:06] Is this a messic mission?
[6:09] Were you given this special power
[6:14] um by God or Satan in order to
[6:17] accomplish a special mission on this
[6:20] world? You cannot help but feel this.
[6:24] Okay, I know. And again, I know this
[6:27] feels strange, but I guarantee you if
[6:29] you were bitten by red spider and you
[6:32] have all these special powers,
[6:34] eventually you're going to ask this
[6:35] question.
[6:37] >> Why did God pick me? Okay, that's the
[6:40] first thing. The second thing is
[6:43] eventually you also kind of Oops. Sorry.
[6:47] Okay. Okay.
[6:50] Okay, I I need to get Okay, sorry. No
[6:53] worries. No worries.
[7:02] >> Is it holding?
[7:03] >> Yeah, it's holding. Okay. Okay. So, the
[7:06] first thing is you feel
[7:09] um anxiety. You want to know
[7:13] who picked you and what your mission is.
[7:16] But then what happens next is you feel
[7:21] really lonely. Okay? And the loneliness
[7:24] and alienation is another source of
[7:27] anxiety.
[7:30] You want to know I'm special, but are
[7:33] there other special people in this
[7:35] world? And how do I find them? And how
[7:37] do I work with them? because what I
[7:41] really want to do is
[7:45] keep my power.
[7:47] Okay, what you find is okay
[7:53] I enjoy this power and so how do I keep
[7:56] this power? How do I preserve this
[7:58] power? How do I extend this power?
[8:00] Because the great fear of course is
[8:03] the government will come and imprison
[8:06] you to experiment on you, right?
[8:09] You have this fear, you have this
[8:11] anxiety. And so the best way to preserve
[8:13] yourself is to find other people like
[8:15] yourself
[8:18] and work together
[8:20] in order to amass more power, in order
[8:23] to preserve your power, in order to
[8:25] enjoy your life. Okay? And this is why
[8:31] we have
[8:33] secret societies
[8:36] because if you are in a position of
[8:38] power,
[8:41] you feel anxiety
[8:45] and there are three sources of this this
[8:47] anxiety. First of all, you don't know
[8:50] why or where you got this power from.
[8:53] You have to explain it. Okay, that's why
[8:54] you're silly a cold. Second is you have
[8:57] a deep desire to preserve to protect
[8:59] your power from others. And the only way
[9:03] to do that is to find a like you and to
[9:07] work together otherwise the government
[9:11] could come and just
[9:13] um kidnap you and experiment you. Okay.
[9:16] And the third thing of course is now
[9:19] that now that you have the special
[9:20] power, you want more of it. And this
[9:25] psychology
[9:27] helps us understand the psychology of
[9:29] the elite. People like Donald Trump,
[9:32] Vladimir Putin, Peter Theo, anyone with
[9:35] more power, with more fame, with more
[9:39] wealth than anyone else. Okay? They all
[9:42] think like this.
[9:46] And what is it that allows them to amass
[9:51] so much power, wealth, and fame? What is
[9:56] your superpower? Okay,
[9:59] so if you look at the elite,
[10:03] what their superpower is is sin.
[10:09] In other words,
[10:12] the people in charge, the people with
[10:15] all the power, money, and wealth in the
[10:17] world, it is not because they are
[10:19] smarter than we are.
[10:22] It is not because they are more
[10:25] hardworking than we are.
[10:29] It's because they are
[10:34] more amoral than we are. Okay. So to
[10:38] understand this, let's do another
[10:40] thought experiment. All right. And the
[10:42] thought experiment is very easy. You are
[10:45] put into a room.
[10:48] Okay. You stand in the room. Standing
[10:51] beside you or sorry, sitting across from
[10:53] you
[10:55] is a man in a hood. Okay. A black hood.
[10:59] You can't see the man. You don't know
[11:01] the man. Okay. And there's a table
[11:05] separating you two. And on the table is
[11:08] a handgun.
[11:12] Someone comes into the room and says to
[11:14] you,
[11:16] "If you take the gun
[11:19] and shoot to death the man in the hood,
[11:26] I'll give you $10,000."
[11:29] And you think about it and like
[11:32] that's not a lot of money. $10,000 to
[11:34] kill someone. I'm not I'm not gonna do
[11:36] it. So, you say no. Then the uh
[11:40] authority says to you, I'll give you a
[11:43] million dollars. You're like, wow, a
[11:46] million dollars is really good. I can
[11:51] buy maybe half a house in Montreal now,
[11:54] right? But you're like, "Yeah, but
[11:56] that's still not enough." And then the
[11:58] guy is like, "I'll give you $10
[12:01] million."
[12:02] and you're like, "hm, $10 million is now
[12:06] lifechanging."
[12:08] And so, yeah, I'll do it. Okay, so you
[12:12] agree to do it. But then what happens is
[12:14] this. You try to pick up the gun, but
[12:18] your hand shakes.
[12:21] Okay? You can't pick it up. You're
[12:24] paralyzed. You've agreed to do it. You
[12:26] want to do it. You want the money, but
[12:28] you're paralyzed. You can't do it.
[12:32] That's most of us, okay? That is
[12:34] 99.9999%
[12:36] of us, okay? At a certain amount of
[12:39] money, $10 million, $100 million, a
[12:41] billion dollars, who knows, we will
[12:43] agree to kill
[12:46] uh the other person in the hood. But
[12:49] when we try to do it, we can't do it.
[12:53] We're paralyzed. We're frozen by we
[12:58] don't know what. Maybe our morality,
[13:00] maybe our conscience, maybe an angel
[13:03] protecting us. Who knows?
[13:06] What separates the elite, what makes
[13:09] people like Jeff Bezos, Peter Theo, S.
[13:12] Alman unique is they can do this. Okay?
[13:16] They can take the gun, point at the
[13:19] person, shoot it, and not feel anything
[13:21] afterwards.
[13:23] That is what separates the elite from
[13:26] everyone else.
[13:28] All right. They are killers.
[13:32] So it is their capacity to sin
[13:35] that is a superpower.
[13:38] And because they have the capacity to
[13:40] sin, this separates them from everyone
[13:42] else. This allows them to accumulate
[13:44] more power than anyone else.
[13:48] But then
[13:49] this creates the the anxiety in them,
[13:53] right? Why have the superpower to sin?
[13:56] who gave it to me?
[13:59] How do I find other people like myself
[14:01] so that we can work together to amass
[14:03] more power?
[14:06] >> Okay, sorry.
[14:07] >> Quick question.
[14:10] >> I cuz I imagine
[14:12] um so like the next Samman or like the
[14:15] next Peter Teal is is somewhere out
[14:18] there, right? And he could be like
[14:20] everyone of like anybody, right? Um, and
[14:25] I feel like at some point they would
[14:27] have felt that same conscience like when
[14:29] they were when they had to make that
[14:31] decision like a critical decision that
[14:34] had a level of morality to it. So don't
[14:36] you feel I I feel like they would still
[14:39] feel it but it's more the superpower is
[14:42] the capacity to wash that sin.
[14:44] >> Yeah. Um Okay.
[14:47] All right. So so let me continue my
[14:50] lecture. Okay. Cuz we're doing a lot
[14:51] today. All right. things will come a
[14:53] clear a lot clearer once I finish the
[14:56] lecture.
[14:56] >> Okay. So, um
[15:00] the the the capacity to sin is a great
[15:02] superpower in the world we have today.
[15:05] Okay. If you are able to break the
[15:06] rules, you're able to do things uh that
[15:10] other people cannot do, you will climb
[15:12] the corporate ladder, you'll climb the
[15:14] bureaucratic ladder, you'll climb any
[15:16] ladder a lot more smooth than anyone
[15:19] else. Okay? If you uh work in the AI
[15:23] industry and you know who sent Oman is
[15:26] anyone you talk to will tell you what
[15:30] distinguish sent Oman from everyone else
[15:32] in the world is not his capacity to
[15:35] program. He actually doesn't even know
[15:36] how to program. Okay. He doesn't spend
[15:39] any of his time programming. He he
[15:41] doesn't have any engineering or
[15:43] scientific talent.
[15:46] what he has is a superpower
[15:49] to cheat, lie, and steal to get what he
[15:52] wants.
[15:54] He's not a great speaker, but when he's
[15:57] speaking with you individually,
[15:58] one-on-one, he will tell you exactly
[16:00] what you want to hear, even though it
[16:03] may be a complete lie.
[16:06] Okay? That is his superpower. And I I
[16:08] would make the argument that that's not
[16:10] just his superpower. It's a superpower
[16:12] of most people in the upper echelons of
[16:16] the elite. To become a billionaire, you
[16:19] have to have a different psychology than
[16:22] anyone else. Um, normal people will just
[16:26] say that these people are just
[16:27] psychopaths.
[16:29] Okay? But my argument to you is
[16:33] in order to be a psychopath and to be an
[16:34] effective psychopath, you need a certain
[16:38] philosophy, a religion to help you
[16:41] understand your superpower and allow you
[16:45] to act it out in a way that allows you
[16:48] to sleep at night. Okay? And this
[16:50] philosophy, this religion is called
[16:53] Sabine Fagnism. Something that you've
[16:56] never heard of. Some of you may have
[16:57] heard of it, but it is the ideology, the
[17:00] religion of the elite. And today, what
[17:03] I'm going to do is slowly
[17:06] explain to you what it is, where it came
[17:10] from, and its impact on the world. Okay.
[17:15] All right. So, these are two thought
[17:17] experiments that I hope help you
[17:20] understand the psychology of the elite.
[17:24] Okay. The elite their capacity to sin is
[17:28] what makes them powerful. But once they
[17:30] have that superpower, they need to
[17:32] explain to themselves why do I have it?
[17:34] What's it for? Okay. And this religion
[17:37] is what we call 17 fism. And so what
[17:40] what I will do now is explain to you
[17:42] what where it came from. All right.
[17:45] Okay. But for me to explain that, I
[17:48] first need to explain to you what
[17:51] capitalism is. Okay. So um Max Weber the
[17:55] very famous German sociologist he's
[17:58] basically the father of sociology he
[18:01] wrote a very influential essay called
[18:03] capitalism and the protestant work ethic
[18:06] and his major argument is it was the
[18:08] protestant reformation
[18:11] that allow capitalism to happen. Okay.
[18:16] So let me explain the basic argument in
[18:19] a very simple way. All right. So,
[18:24] um, before for most of human history,
[18:28] money was not a big deal. No one
[18:31] actually cared if you were wealthy. So,
[18:35] let's do a thought experiment. Let's
[18:37] just say, for a reason, today you all
[18:42] inherit $10 million, okay? Or $10
[18:45] million just flies out of the sky and
[18:47] hits you on the head, okay? $10 million
[18:49] of of gold coins.
[18:52] Well, what would you do? And most of you
[18:55] will say, well, I will go invest in the
[18:58] stock market. I'll put in the bank.
[19:01] But if you think about it intuitively,
[19:05] logically, rationally, that actually
[19:07] makes no sense, right? Because this is
[19:10] real money, $10 million of gold coin,
[19:13] and you put it into an abstract concept
[19:16] called a stock market or a bank. You
[19:19] don't know if you'll get it back. All
[19:22] right? So, traditionally, what we did
[19:24] was we took that $10 million of gold
[19:28] pieces and what we did was we gave it to
[19:31] the community, right? We gave it to the
[19:34] people around us and we had banquetss,
[19:39] celebrations.
[19:41] Why do we do that? Because social status
[19:45] is tangible.
[19:47] It's real, right? So, if I give this 10
[19:52] million gold pieces to everyone in my
[19:54] community, I am now king of the
[19:56] community or I'm an elder. And that's
[19:59] what matters to me. That's real power.
[20:02] Status is real power.
[20:06] Okay, that makes sense. Putting the 10
[20:09] million gold pieces uh in the stock
[20:11] market makes no sense whatsoever. So,
[20:14] how did we reach a point where
[20:16] everything we do today is basically
[20:18] counterintuitive. It has to do with the
[20:21] protest reformation. Okay. So at this
[20:23] time in history for most of um European
[20:26] history the Catholic Church is in
[20:29] charge.
[20:32] Okay. And the power of the Catholic
[20:34] Church was in its ability to determine
[20:38] who went to heaven or hell or to
[20:41] purgatory. It all it could also
[20:43] determine how much time you spent in
[20:45] purgatory before you went into heaven.
[20:48] Okay. All right. So
[20:52] that was its power and the source of its
[20:55] authority, but it was also the source of
[20:57] its corruption.
[20:59] Because what the church would do is say,
[21:02] you know, you're you were a bad person,
[21:05] but if you give me like millions of
[21:06] dollars so I can build a church, I'll
[21:09] give you a pass to purgatory, and then
[21:12] if you pay me some more money, I'll give
[21:15] you a pass to heaven. Okay?
[21:18] And this caused tremendous outrage
[21:21] amongst a lot of people. This corruption
[21:24] of the church um was just outraged a lot
[21:29] of true believers including people like
[21:31] Martin Luther and John Calvin. And but
[21:34] they also recognized that um the
[21:37] Catholic Church is too powerful and
[21:39] people really believe the Catholic
[21:41] Church have the power to determine who
[21:44] went to heaven and who went to hell. So
[21:46] if you want to destroy the Catholic
[21:47] Church, what we need to do is take that
[21:50] power away from them. Okay? And so John
[21:54] Calvin created something called
[21:56] Calvinism.
[21:58] And to counter
[22:01] um the church's power, Calvinism
[22:03] proposed the idea of double
[22:07] predestination.
[22:11] Okay, double predestination. It sounds
[22:13] like a very complicated idea. It's not.
[22:15] It's very simple. The the idea of double
[22:17] predestination is when God created
[22:21] everything, God also determined
[22:26] before the coming of before the
[22:28] beginning of time who went to heaven and
[22:31] who went to hell. Double predestination.
[22:34] Okay. Your destiny was decided at the
[22:36] start of time. In other words, the
[22:40] church does not matter. Only God
[22:43] matters.
[22:45] Don't listen to the church, listen to
[22:48] God.
[22:50] But and so communism did a lot to uh
[22:54] degrade the authority of the church. But
[22:56] this leads to anxiety. The anxiety is
[23:01] how do you know if you were selected to
[23:06] go to heaven, right?
[23:09] And the answer is, well, you know if God
[23:12] favors you.
[23:14] And how how do you know God favors you?
[23:16] Because you make a lot of money, right?
[23:19] And the more money you make,
[23:22] you know, the more God favors you.
[23:25] So before
[23:28] you had to be obedient to the church,
[23:31] now you have to make a lot of money for
[23:33] yourself. Okay? And this leads to
[23:37] capitalism because again before
[23:41] if you had money you would either give
[23:44] it to your friends and relatives or you
[23:46] give it to the church. Now you have to
[23:48] make as much money for yourself as
[23:49] possible. So you save it. But not only
[23:52] do you save it but you have to go invest
[23:55] it. Okay? And this creates the Dutch
[23:57] Republic. Um because this investment the
[24:01] Dutch Republic becomes the wealthiest
[24:03] society in the world.
[24:05] It creates a stock market. It creates
[24:07] banking. It creates equity. Creates the
[24:09] the it creates the modern system of
[24:13] capitalism.
[24:15] Okay. Um but the Dutch Republic had a
[24:19] major problem. The major problem was
[24:21] that it could be easily invaded by the
[24:25] European powers, the Hapsburgs,
[24:28] uh the Vatican. So what happened in
[24:31] 1688? Okay, 1688 was a very crucial
[24:34] year. 1688 was something called the
[24:37] Glorious Revolution. And the Glorious
[24:39] Revolution was agreement um between the
[24:44] English nobility and the Dutch nobility
[24:46] to merge together.
[24:50] And the way they did that was they
[24:52] transfer the wealth of the Dutch
[24:54] Republic, all the gold
[24:57] to England. Okay.
[25:02] And then in 1694
[25:06] this arrangement became corporatized
[25:10] systemized.
[25:12] Okay. 1694 was the year that the Bank of
[25:15] England was chartered.
[25:22] Okay. What is the Bank of England and
[25:24] why is it special? Okay. So
[25:28] before in European history um kings in
[25:32] order to finance wars they would borrow
[25:34] money from merchants right and merchants
[25:37] would lend the money to kings in order
[25:39] to grow their capital. The problem with
[25:41] that is the king could die the king
[25:45] could lose the war or the king could
[25:47] just be like I don't I will not honor
[25:49] this contract. Okay. So this created a
[25:52] lot of risk for merchants. The Bank of
[25:54] England solved this problem by um
[25:58] creating a situation where the private
[26:01] own the owners of the Bank of England
[26:02] were the merchants. Okay. And the and
[26:06] the organization
[26:09] that borne money from the Bank of
[26:10] England was not the king. It was the
[26:14] people of England. Okay. for parliament.
[26:24] Okay. So remember before the king had
[26:28] the power to issue currency. Now the
[26:31] merchants have the power to issue
[26:33] currency but is backed by the parliament
[26:37] which is the people.
[26:39] Okay. And to make this system
[26:44] um
[26:47] palatable to everyone, new ideas were
[26:51] created in order to justify the system.
[26:54] Okay. The first major idea that was
[26:55] created was private property. The
[26:59] sanctity of private property. In school,
[27:01] you may have learned about John Lock and
[27:03] how he said that um there are three
[27:07] inevitable rights for every human being.
[27:10] Okay, they are life, liberty and the
[27:13] pursuit of property. Why? Because they
[27:15] needed to justify this silly system they
[27:18] created where the merchants have the
[27:21] power to print money and the people have
[27:23] the right to borrow it and have to pay
[27:25] it back at interest eventually.
[27:28] Okay.
[27:30] Um and this also created the idea of
[27:33] democracy, right? because people had to
[27:36] believe that they that they had a
[27:40] ownership stake in the country in order
[27:44] for them to want to fight wars for these
[27:46] merchants.
[27:48] Okay? And this system created the modern
[27:54] system of transnational capitalism
[27:57] that we have today.
[28:03] Okay? And this is something that most
[28:05] scholars agree on. This is nothing
[28:06] controversial in anything I've said. It
[28:08] makes a lot of sense, right? There's a
[28:11] problem though. The problem is this.
[28:15] This explains the Protestants,
[28:19] but it doesn't explain the Jews.
[28:23] Right?
[28:26] There's a huge
[28:28] hole in this history which is we don't
[28:31] know how the Jews came to believe what
[28:34] they believe. How about the Rothschilds?
[28:37] Right? This system explains the
[28:39] Christians, the Protestants does not
[28:42] explain why the Jews behave the way they
[28:47] do. Does not even explain. It doesn't
[28:49] explain what the why the Rothschilds
[28:50] believe the way they do. And as I keep
[28:54] on saying every person needs a overall
[28:58] guiding philosophy for capitalists who
[29:01] are Christian, you have Calvinism.
[29:05] The question then is if you're Jewish,
[29:07] you obviously don't believe in
[29:08] Calvinism. Then what do you believe in?
[29:11] And the answer is Sabatine Frankism.
[29:15] That's what they believe. Okay. So now
[29:17] what I'm going to do is I'm going to
[29:19] show you what Sabine Frankenism is. But
[29:23] for you to appreciate what it is, you
[29:25] also have to remember this logic. Okay?
[29:28] Because the same spirit that animated
[29:31] reform in the Christian world will also
[29:34] animate reform in the Jewish diaspora.
[29:39] Okay. All right. So, some key takeaways
[29:43] was that there was a first of all
[29:47] a revolution.
[29:52] Okay, in the Christian world against the
[29:56] power of authority.
[29:59] Okay, that's the first thing that
[30:00] happened. Second thing that happened was
[30:02] that after this revolution was
[30:04] successful, they needed to systemize it.
[30:07] Okay, you then have to systemize a new
[30:12] religion.
[30:14] Okay. And then what we also need to
[30:18] recognize is that a lot of what's
[30:23] happening was an accidental response to
[30:28] historical events. Okay, does that make
[30:30] sense? No one planned for capitalism to
[30:33] emerge. Capitalism emerged through a
[30:36] series of crisis
[30:39] that the Christian world face. Same same
[30:41] thing with 17 fragmentism. Okay. Another
[30:45] thing that um
[30:49] um is important is eventually what
[30:53] happens is
[30:55] communism isn't really discussed because
[30:57] it it just become part of nature. It's
[31:00] just something that just become the
[31:02] world that we live in. It's the air we
[31:04] breathe. So we we don't think about it.
[31:05] We don't discuss it. things that
[31:07] actually make no sense like for example
[31:09] go invest in stock market and see your
[31:11] wealth grow. We take it as a natural
[31:15] thing. Okay. All right. So 17
[31:19] fragmentism will follow the same pattern
[31:21] where 17 fism was a response to the
[31:25] authority of the rabbis the corrupt
[31:27] authority of the rabbis.
[31:29] Okay. Then they begin to systemize their
[31:35] um belief system and eventually it will
[31:38] it will spread throughout the Jewish
[31:40] world so that it becomes part of
[31:42] everyday life parts of it becomes part
[31:44] of reality. So like no one discusses
[31:46] Sabine and Frankenm today in the Jewish
[31:49] diaspora. It's just part of who they
[31:52] are. Okay? And and by the way I'm I'm
[31:55] referring to capitalists by the way.
[31:57] Okay? Not all Jewish people. This is
[31:59] capitalist. The Calvinists um the
[32:02] Christian capitalists are Calvinists.
[32:05] The Jewish capitalists are Sabatine
[32:08] Frankus. Okay. Does that make sense
[32:10] guys? All right. So, all right. Let me
[32:13] now spend some time and discuss
[32:16] the Jewish diaspora.
[32:38] Okay. Um so
[32:43] um
[32:45] first let me explain the difference uh
[32:48] between the Catholic Church and the
[32:50] Christ reformation. Okay. And this is
[32:52] important. um for better understand the
[32:55] revolution of 17 fans. Okay. So um let's
[33:00] look at the Catholic Church and the
[33:03] Protestants.
[33:07] Okay.
[33:09] All right. So there are lots of
[33:11] differences between the Catholic Church
[33:13] and and Protestantism. Okay. The first
[33:14] is the Catholic Church believe that the
[33:17] church is the ultimate authority of God
[33:20] on earth. Okay. If you want to access
[33:23] God, you have to go through the church,
[33:26] specifically the priests. All right? And
[33:28] one manifestation of that is Catholics
[33:31] are not allowed to read the Bible.
[33:36] All right? You're a Catholic, you are
[33:37] not allowed to read the Bible. You have
[33:39] to like go to church and the priest will
[33:40] tell you what the Bible says.
[33:43] The revolution of the of the process is
[33:45] no the individual for the Bible allows
[33:50] you direct access to God. Okay. So the
[33:54] center of of authority in the Protestant
[33:57] world is the Bible. In the Catholic
[33:59] world the center of authority is the
[34:01] church. Okay. That's the first major
[34:03] difference. And again this is all
[34:04] rebellion against Catholic uh supremacy.
[34:09] Okay. The second major difference and
[34:11] this is really important is the Catholic
[34:15] is something called a millillennial.
[34:19] Okay, a millennial is basically
[34:22] non-meianic
[34:23] or guys we've already achieved
[34:27] perfection on earth. Let's not worry
[34:29] about anything. All right. All you have
[34:31] to do is obey the church.
[34:37] But the Protestants believe, okay, if
[34:40] you remove the authority of the church,
[34:43] now you become messianic.
[34:48] Okay, does that make sense? Because the
[34:50] Bible is not a finished story. Jesus
[34:53] died and he promised to come back, but
[34:56] he's not back yet. So, the story is not
[34:57] done yet. Okay? In the Catholic world,
[35:00] you're taught that, well, Jesus died so
[35:02] the church could be born, so don't worry
[35:04] about it. The church is now in in
[35:05] control. And the church will uh when
[35:09] Jesus is ready then uh Jesus will come
[35:11] back. Okay. But the church has already
[35:12] finished the mission of Jesus.
[35:15] The Protestants believe no um without
[35:18] the church it means that Jesus will
[35:20] return and so now we have to wait for
[35:22] for his return. And some Protestants who
[35:24] are what we call uh premillennial
[35:29] um Christians they actually think we you
[35:31] can actually force his return.
[35:34] Okay. That's the second uh major uh
[35:39] difference. And the third major
[35:40] difference difference of course is the
[35:42] Catholic um is justification
[35:46] by work.
[35:48] The Protestants is justification by
[35:50] faith. Okay?
[35:53] So the Catholic Church is we don't care
[35:56] if you're hypocrite. We don't care if
[35:58] you lie. As long as you do what we tell
[36:00] you, as long as your actions are good,
[36:02] then you will go to heaven. The problem
[36:03] is like that's nonsense. Your heart has
[36:06] to be true to God. Okay? Your faith is
[36:08] what matters. All right? And as we can
[36:11] see, all three of these things are a
[36:13] response to the authority of the
[36:17] Catholic Church. Okay? And what I will
[36:20] show you is 17 frankism is also a
[36:22] response to the power corrupt authority
[36:25] of the rabbis. Okay? But first, we also
[36:28] need to appreciate there are fundamental
[36:30] differences between the Catholic Church
[36:32] and rebbitic authority. Okay? which
[36:34] which right now in this in this time in
[36:37] history which is about you know 1400
[36:39] 1500 rebbitic authority is what controls
[36:42] the Jewish diaspora okay so let's look
[36:45] at the church
[36:48] and the rabbis
[36:51] okay rebbitic authority
[36:55] >> can I just ask quickly before you go on
[36:58] to just clarify the difference between
[36:59] amillennialism
[37:01] and and messianic So messianic thinks
[37:05] that uh there's a savior coming and
[37:08] there will be peace and the a
[37:10] millennialism don't believe that.
[37:12] >> Okay. Okay. All right. Okay. Sorry.
[37:14] Okay. Mess messianism believes that the
[37:17] Messiah is coming. Okay. When the
[37:19] Messiah comes, if Jesus returns,
[37:21] there'll be a thousand years of peace
[37:25] before the day of judgment. Okay? And
[37:27] this is why it's called uh
[37:28] premillennialism. Why? Because you a
[37:30] thousand years before the day of
[37:32] judgment. Also there's also something
[37:34] called postmillennialism which is you
[37:35] have the day of judgment and then a
[37:36] thousand years of peace. Okay. All
[37:39] right. So millennism basically refers to
[37:42] mezianism.
[37:44] Amillinism the a means without or no.
[37:47] Okay. So no millennium. Why? Because uh
[37:51] there is no uh we don't worry about
[37:53] these things. Okay. So the church is
[37:57] radically anti- messianism. Okay. Does
[38:01] that make sense? So there's no peace, no
[38:03] no thousand years of goodness. No,
[38:06] that's what you're saying.
[38:08] >> Yeah,
[38:08] >> that's what the Catholic Church
[38:09] believes.
[38:10] >> That's right.
[38:11] >> Okay.
[38:11] >> Yeah. Because Augustine uses the concept
[38:13] of out of history, which is the Catholic
[38:17] Church, it is a spiritual power, not a
[38:19] temporal power.
[38:20] >> I understand.
[38:21] >> Okay. Do you understand?
[38:22] >> Yes. Thank you.
[38:22] >> And so therefore, we don't worry about
[38:24] worldly advance. Got it.
[38:25] >> Okay. All right. So the Catholic Church
[38:28] and the rebbiting authority there are
[38:29] three major differences that we need to
[38:32] understand for for the for the purpose
[38:34] of our discussion. Okay. The first major
[38:36] difference is the Catholic Church as as
[38:39] as I was talking about with Daniel, it
[38:41] is a spiritual authority.
[38:44] Okay. The rebbitic is worldly. Okay. So
[38:48] most people don't actually know this,
[38:50] but it's a key crucial difference
[38:53] between Christianity and Judaism.
[38:56] Okay, Christians believe that if you're
[38:59] a good person, you go to heaven and be
[39:00] with Jesus, right? In other words, you
[39:03] don't believe this world actually
[39:04] matters.
[39:06] The Jews believe something completely
[39:07] different. The Jews believe that
[39:11] God wants to come to this world and live
[39:15] amongst his people, the Jewish people.
[39:17] And the Jewish people were created, the
[39:19] chosen people, in order to make this
[39:21] world h like a place for God to live in.
[39:24] That's why they built Solomon's temple
[39:26] as a home for God. Okay. So, a major
[39:30] difference between the Catholic Church
[39:32] and Rebian authority is Catholic
[39:33] Catholic Church believes this world
[39:35] doesn't matter. In fact, what's really
[39:36] strange is every religion except Judaism
[39:40] believes this. Okay? The Hindus, the
[39:43] Buddhists, the Christians, the the
[39:45] Muslims all believe this world is just a
[39:48] temporary
[39:50] place before our souls ascend to heaven
[39:53] and be with God. But the Jews like no
[39:56] what matters is this world. We have to
[39:59] be the light of nations. We have to
[40:00] bring God to earth. Okay? In other
[40:04] words, what the Catholic people say is
[40:08] the Christian religion is spiritual but
[40:11] the Jewish religion is worldly or
[40:14] temporal. Okay? It's not that simple,
[40:16] but for our purposes, we'll we'll just
[40:18] go with with with this difference. Okay?
[40:20] The Christians are spiritual. The Jews
[40:23] are worldly people. They care about
[40:26] materialism. Christians don't. Okay,
[40:29] that's the first major uh difference.
[40:32] Second major difference of course is the
[40:34] church um has a clear hierarchy. Okay,
[40:39] the pope is in charge. Below the pope
[40:42] are these bishops which are basically
[40:43] just regional popes. Okay. Okay. There's
[40:46] a clear hierarchy in the church and they
[40:50] take heresy very seriously. Okay? You
[40:53] can't diverge from paple authority. If
[40:56] you do, they'll come and kill you.
[40:59] But the Jewish religion is very
[41:01] different, right? Because the Jewish
[41:02] religion has no hierarchy. It is a
[41:04] diaspora.
[41:07] And so you have within the Jewish
[41:10] community and again there aren't that
[41:12] many Jews in the world, right? But you
[41:14] have tens of thousands of different
[41:18] beliefs. It's the rabbi who is the
[41:23] authority. Okay.
[41:26] So this it's a huge diaspora. You have
[41:28] huge diversity.
[41:32] Okay. Um and the third major difference
[41:36] is this. How is it the church
[41:40] determines or how is the church able to
[41:42] control its flock, its people? Well,
[41:45] fool the idea of heaven and hell, right?
[41:50] Okay. If you're a good person, you go to
[41:52] heaven. If you're a bad person, you go
[41:53] to hell. Okay. And that's how the church
[41:56] exerts authority over people. The
[41:59] rabbitic system is different. The system
[42:02] they use is sin. Okay? the Torah.
[42:09] Every Jewish person must follow the laws
[42:13] of Moses, the Mosaic law, the Torah.
[42:17] Okay? Sin.
[42:22] Jews must
[42:24] um avoid committing sin. And you do that
[42:27] by following the ten commandments. Okay.
[42:29] The laws of Moses. Okay. All right. So
[42:32] now I want to talk about the concept of
[42:33] sin because the concept of sin is
[42:36] actually very concrete, very specific in
[42:40] Judaism. Okay. So why does sin exist? It
[42:44] exists because humanity basically Adam
[42:47] and Eve away from God.
[42:51] Okay. So in the garden of Eden, everyone
[42:53] was perfect. We were one with God. But
[42:58] because we betrayed the trust of God, we
[43:01] were cast away. When we were cast away
[43:04] in order because we were so sinful, the
[43:07] law of Moses came to control us, came to
[43:11] help us be less less sinful.
[43:14] But the moment that we atone or redeem
[43:18] ourselves for the Garden of Eden, we
[43:21] will become good with God, right? And
[43:24] then what will happen is sin will
[43:27] disappear from this world and a new
[43:29] system will develop. Okay. God will come
[43:32] down and throw away the law of Moses
[43:35] because we don't need the law of Moses.
[43:36] The law of Moses are for children and
[43:39] law and the God will now institute a new
[43:42] system where there is no sin where
[43:44] there's no law because we are united
[43:46] with God and therefore we are incapable
[43:49] of sin. Okay?
[43:52] Right? So this is all important. Why?
[43:56] Because the same process
[43:59] that will infect the Catholic world will
[44:04] now infect the Jewish world. Calvinism
[44:09] was a response to the corruption
[44:12] of the Catholic Church. Sapine frankism
[44:16] is a response to the corruption of
[44:19] rebbitic authority.
[44:21] Okay. Now, at this time in history,
[44:23] rebbiting authority is extremely
[44:25] corrupt. And you and again, you know, um
[44:29] you're not I mean it it's hard for for
[44:32] people people to appreciate. Okay? So, I
[44:33] explain it to you slowly. You understand
[44:35] what's going on. We all understand why
[44:37] the Catholic Church is corrupt, right?
[44:39] Because that's too much power. It's the
[44:41] ultimate authority in Europe at this
[44:43] time. It controls 50% of uh European
[44:46] lands. Okay? And it's embedded with
[44:49] nobility. So we all understand the
[44:51] corruption of Catholic church of
[44:53] Catholic church but rebbiting authority
[44:55] is also corrupt. Why? Because the rabbis
[44:59] need to survive.
[45:01] Right?
[45:04] In the Jewish tradition, what they
[45:06] believe is the Jews are the chosen
[45:08] people and they have responsibility
[45:11] to
[45:13] help usher in the Messiah who will then
[45:16] redeem Jews
[45:19] and cause a reunion between the Jews and
[45:21] God. Okay, that's what most Jews
[45:23] believe. But in order for Judaism to
[45:26] survive at this time in history, the the
[45:29] medi the medieval period in both the
[45:32] Christian world and Islamic world, they
[45:33] can't do that, right? The Jews can't be
[45:35] like, "We are the chosen people. We're
[45:36] better than you and we're going to come
[45:39] and conquer everyone." Okay? Because
[45:40] because then the both the Muslims and
[45:42] the Christians will kill the Jews. So
[45:45] their compromise was the rabbi said to
[45:48] the Jewish people, "Guys,
[45:51] God
[45:53] knows everything. God has a plan for
[45:56] everything, we must be patient and wait
[45:59] for the coming of the Messiah."
[46:02] Okay? And in order for us to bring in
[46:05] the Messiah,
[46:07] we must follow the law of Moses to prove
[46:10] we are worthy of the Messiah. Okay? And
[46:14] this is not actually satisfying to most
[46:16] Jews, but it's a compromise the rabbis
[46:19] need to make in order to maintain their
[46:22] authority
[46:24] and in order to create peace between the
[46:26] Jews and the Muslims and Christians.
[46:29] Okay. The problem with this is this
[46:32] screws over the Jewish people. Okay.
[46:35] Because it basically makes them um
[46:38] second citizens
[46:40] wherever they are in the Christian
[46:42] world. They are denied education. They
[46:44] are denied ownership of land. They
[46:46] become basically slaves to nobility.
[46:49] Okay. But the but the worst thing is
[46:52] they are also scapegoats, right? So
[46:55] whenever something happens like maybe
[46:56] the black death or any wars, the first
[47:01] people to be scapegoed always the Jews.
[47:04] Okay? So throughout this history for 100
[47:06] years, Jews are second class citizens
[47:09] and they're always scapegoed.
[47:12] Okay. When times are good, they're fine.
[47:15] But when times are bad, they're always
[47:16] the first to be massacred or expelled.
[47:21] All right. So, there are certain Jews
[47:24] who believe this system sucks. All
[47:28] right? And the first person who
[47:29] basically said this system sucks, we
[47:31] shouldn't go with the system anymore.
[47:32] His name is Sapite Zevi. Okay? And this
[47:35] is the year 1666.
[47:39] Sapi Zevi. There are different ways to
[47:41] pronounce his name. The correct way is
[47:43] Sati Zev. Okay, that's the correct way.
[47:46] But he's more commonly referred to as
[47:48] Satai Zevi. All right. And
[47:52] what what in 1666 he declared himself
[47:57] the Messiah. Okay. The year 1666 is very
[48:00] very important. Why? Because at this
[48:03] time in history, um, for the longest
[48:07] time, the Jews have found a safe haven
[48:09] called the Polish Lutheran Commonwealth.
[48:14] And, um, think of that as basically the
[48:16] equivalent of the United States at this
[48:18] time in history. It was a new territory.
[48:22] Um, and they were desperate for
[48:24] energetic people. They were also
[48:25] desperate for capital. So, they welcomed
[48:27] Jews into their country. And these Jews
[48:31] were hardworking. They were um very
[48:35] energetic and they were very creative
[48:36] and that allowed them to prosper.
[48:39] But unfortunately
[48:42] they were also scapegoats and so they
[48:45] became um middlemen or managers for the
[48:48] nobility because nobility didn't want to
[48:49] work. Right? So it was the Jews who went
[48:51] to collect taxes. They were the Jews
[48:53] were the ones who managed a lot of
[48:54] property for the nobility which pissed
[48:56] off a lot of different people. So a war
[48:59] broke out. Um the co and the cosaks came
[49:02] and massacred a lot of Jews. Now the
[49:06] thing about the Jewish religion is the
[49:08] Jews believe that in their darkest hour
[49:10] the messiah will come. So in that at
[49:12] this time in history and this is again
[49:14] the 17th century when Jews are being
[49:16] massacred throughout Europe there's a
[49:18] huge expectation that the Messiah is
[49:21] here. And in 1666
[49:24] Zebi announced, I'm Messiah. And and
[49:27] when he did so,
[49:29] anywhere between a third to half of the
[49:32] Jewish diaspora followed him and said,
[49:35] "He must be the
[49:39] u Messiah."
[49:41] SVI was like John Calvin. He was a
[49:44] revolutionary. And he said, "Okay, I see
[49:47] the system and the rabbis are corrupt
[49:51] and the main source of their power is
[49:53] sin, right? Their ability to enforce the
[49:57] law of Moses on people." And his
[50:01] response is, "Well, if I'm the Messiah,
[50:03] I declare sin to be gone." Okay? No more
[50:08] sin, guys. Why? Because I'm the Messiah.
[50:11] In which case, God has forgiven the
[50:13] Jewish people. in which case the Jewish
[50:15] people are now are no longer bounded by
[50:17] the law of Moses.
[50:20] Okay, sin is a worldly idea.
[50:25] All right, so he got rid of the idea of
[50:26] sin. This of course pissed off the
[50:28] rabbis because the rabbis were using sin
[50:31] as the main instrument to control
[50:33] people, right? The law of Moses. Okay,
[50:35] but this was a major conflict between
[50:37] Sarah Zevi and the rabbis.
[50:41] But the Jewish people were following
[50:44] somebody like Zevi, right? Because one
[50:47] sin, the worst sin that you could can
[50:49] commit as a Jew is conversion,
[50:54] right? The first commandment is do not
[50:55] worship false idols. Always be loyal to
[50:58] Yahweh, right? But if Zab Zevi is like,
[51:01] "Nope, that sin does not apply. You can
[51:05] convert because who cares, right? Your
[51:07] heart still belongs to God. You know
[51:09] you're a Jewish person. You don't have
[51:11] to pretend to follow the law of Moses,
[51:15] right? So you can convert. And the Jews
[51:17] are like, that's a great idea because
[51:20] now if I convert to Christianity, I can
[51:22] now have access to land education
[51:27] and but what that does is it destroys
[51:31] all rebbitic authority.
[51:34] Right now you don't have a need for
[51:35] rabbis. So there's this huge conflict
[51:37] now between the rabbis and zab zevi the
[51:40] revolutionary.
[51:42] So what the rabbis did and this was
[51:44] really clever was report zevi to the
[51:48] sultan. Okay,
[51:50] so Zevi he is in the Ottoman Empire
[51:54] which is at this time in history the
[51:55] world power and the rabbi said listen
[51:57] hey guy hey sultan this is guy who's
[52:01] pretending to be the Messiah and which
[52:04] means that he's going to organize the
[52:05] Jewish people and
[52:08] uh claim your throne because that's what
[52:10] the Messiah will will do conquer the
[52:11] world and so uh the Sultan gives Zab
[52:15] Zevi a choice he says okay God okay
[52:17] you're the Messiah right So I'll give
[52:19] you a choice. You either convert to
[52:23] um Islam or I will kill you. Okay?
[52:26] Either the turban or your head. And Zevi
[52:31] uh was supposed to be the Messiah. So he
[52:33] was supposed to fight and destroy the
[52:35] Sultan, right? But he he did something
[52:37] that was very strange and which caused
[52:40] confusion throughout the diaspora, which
[52:42] is he converted to Islam.
[52:46] And the rabbis were like, you see, he's
[52:49] not the Messiah.
[52:51] Okay,
[52:53] but you have to understand the logic of
[52:54] Sab Zevi. If I already said I'm the
[52:56] Messiah and now we are beyond sin, I can
[53:00] do whatever I want and God will forgive
[53:02] me because what matters is my
[53:04] relationship with God, right? So if I
[53:06] convert to Islam, it shouldn't matter.
[53:09] If I if I if I convert to Christianity,
[53:10] it shouldn't matter as well. So he was
[53:12] being the Messiah.
[53:14] But the rabbis uh told their followers
[53:18] you see by conversion by converting he
[53:21] has committed the ultimate sin and
[53:22] therefore we should just ignore him.
[53:23] Okay. So this create created a sism
[53:26] within the uh within the Jewish world.
[53:28] Okay. Basically create a civil war the
[53:30] same way that Calvinism created a civil
[53:32] war in the Christian world. A very
[53:33] similar pattern. Okay. Uh yes. I just
[53:36] wanted to consider for a moment that the
[53:39] rabbis like it may have been not just
[53:42] the laws that Moses made that they were
[53:45] disobeying as a form of sin, but it
[53:48] might have been the laws that the rabbis
[53:50] had created
[53:51] >> like the dietary laws.
[53:53] >> Yes, you're exactly right.
[53:54] >> Laws.
[53:55] >> It became a lot of stuff
[53:57] >> that became Jewish culture and people
[54:00] got fed up with that.
[54:02] >> Yeah, exactly.
[54:02] >> That was another element of their
[54:04] control.
[54:05] >> Yeah. Yeah. Exactly. Right. Thank you.
[54:06] Yeah. Okay. So, um what what go ahead.
[54:09] >> Can we keep the questions for after?
[54:11] >> Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Sorry. Okay. But but
[54:12] that that's a really important point.
[54:13] Okay. So, um the other thing that was
[54:16] happening at this time was the the
[54:18] rabbis were creating too many laws,
[54:21] right? Why? Because that was a source of
[54:22] their power. So, um what Daniel was
[54:24] saying is that there are actually two
[54:26] sources of law in the Jewish world.
[54:29] There is the Torah and there's
[54:31] atonement. Okay. The Torah is the
[54:33] written law. The toonement is the oral
[54:35] law and the oral law is just the
[54:37] interpretation of the um of the uh
[54:41] Torah. Okay. All right. Okay. So um so
[54:46] you guys understand what what what what
[54:47] just happened, right? Uh satinism was a
[54:50] response to the corruption of the rabbis
[54:54] and this caused a shism or civil war
[54:56] within the Jewish world. All right. And
[54:59] this will lead us to fans. Okay. Um, but
[55:02] before before I do that, I need I need
[55:04] to explain something else that's really
[55:06] important if you want to understand the
[55:08] Jewish world, which is something called
[55:09] the Cabala. Okay. The Cabala.
[55:14] All right. So, what is the Cabala? The
[55:17] Cabala is a very simple idea. Okay. So,
[55:21] throughout human history,
[55:24] the occult has been extremely present.
[55:28] All right? Meaning it was always
[55:30] understood throughout most of human
[55:31] history that there are angels and demons
[55:33] amongst us. Okay? And in the Muslim
[55:36] world they call it uh jin, right? But
[55:38] every culture believes there are these
[55:40] spirits around us and they live amongst
[55:43] us. Okay? So this material world is only
[55:45] a small fraction of the total world. Um
[55:51] but
[55:53] um so
[55:55] um this is called hermetic philosophy.
[56:00] I'm not sure if you guys know what this
[56:02] is, okay? But uh I I'll make it very
[56:04] simple. Hermetic philosophy comes to us
[56:08] from Egypt and then this was embedded
[56:10] into uh Greek culture through plainism.
[56:13] Okay? And then through plainism spread
[56:15] into Christianity through Nostism. Okay?
[56:17] So but but but it's a very simple
[56:19] concept. A simple concept is the world
[56:22] that we see is a pure illusion. Okay.
[56:25] Matter is an illusion. What is real is
[56:28] energy, vibration, consciousness.
[56:32] All right? So if you see the world not
[56:34] as one of matter but one but one of but
[56:37] one of energy then certain ideas emerge.
[56:42] Okay. The first idea is
[56:45] um everything is vibration. Okay. So
[56:48] imagine a source a monad. What he's
[56:51] doing is he's breathing. He's emanating.
[56:54] He's thinking. Okay.
[56:58] And this is happening infinitely in
[57:00] infinite dimensions throughout the
[57:01] universe. Eventually you reach a point
[57:03] where the vibration is so slow you can
[57:06] actually see matter. Okay? That's number
[57:08] one. Number two is there's a pattern or
[57:12] there's a rhythm to this movement. Okay?
[57:15] So think about astrology, the movement
[57:16] of the stars, right? Well, there's a
[57:18] pattern to the universe as well, right?
[57:23] Number three is
[57:25] these different in different dimensions.
[57:28] We exist differently. Okay? We are both
[57:31] body, spirit and soul. It's just we
[57:35] exist in different dimensions. Our
[57:37] consciousness comes before our body.
[57:41] These different dimensions, they
[57:43] correspond with each other and they
[57:45] affect each other. There's a there's
[57:47] something called the law of cause and
[57:48] effect where if something happens in
[57:51] your body, it affects your soul and your
[57:53] spirit. But if if something happens in
[57:54] your spirit, it also affects your body
[57:56] as well. All right. Um and so these this
[58:01] is there's more but but but that's a
[58:03] really simple uh introduction. Okay. IC
[58:05] philosophy has been dominant uh in in
[58:09] Egypt and then it went over to Greece
[58:11] through plainism and then it came into
[58:12] Christianity through Nazism. Okay. And
[58:15] Judaism because it's a worldly religion.
[58:18] It was really resilient to heric
[58:21] philosophy for the longest time. But
[58:23] that's changed with the Cabala. Okay. So
[58:25] what the Cabala is doing is it's trying
[58:26] to explain the Bible which is the main
[58:29] source of Jewish faith through a
[58:32] hermetic lens. is trying to tell the
[58:35] story of Adam and Eve through a cosmic
[58:39] um interpretation. Okay, does that make
[58:40] sense? So, let let me give you an
[58:42] example. We know the story of Adam and
[58:45] Eve. Um the Bible just says that Adam
[58:47] and Eve were granted uh paradise in the
[58:51] Garden of Eden. And God just said, "Hey
[58:53] man, don't eat. Just you can do anything
[58:54] you want. You can there's no sin here.
[58:56] There's no evil. There's no laws, but
[58:59] there's only one rule." And the and the
[59:01] one rule is do not eat from the tree of
[59:08] knowledge. Just don't do that and you're
[59:10] good. And of course, Adam and Eve
[59:14] broke that rule, right? And for the
[59:16] longest time, no one could explain why
[59:19] they broke the law. And so, and you have
[59:22] different theologians proposing
[59:24] different solutions. The most famous, of
[59:25] course, is Augustine. And what Austin
[59:27] says is that we were born to sin. Okay?
[59:31] We were made from dust and therefore we
[59:35] lack the capacity to control ourselves.
[59:37] That's why we need a church. The church
[59:39] is a shepherd with the sheep. Okay. All
[59:42] right. Um so the cabala is using
[59:46] philosophy to explain the story of Adam
[59:48] and Eve. All right. So um the the story
[59:53] is this. Okay. In the beginning there
[59:56] was the infinite okay and this is called
[59:59] unsu okay the infinite
[60:03] everything
[60:05] nothing
[60:07] and to create the world because the and
[60:10] solve the infinite he is lonely he's
[60:13] trying to understand himself he retreat
[60:15] into himself and which creates a space
[60:18] okay
[60:20] and the space will create a new force
[60:22] called Adam Adm
[60:27] okay the first being Adam Kadan and um
[60:33] God expresses himself through the tree
[60:35] of life okay the 10 sepharovs
[60:38] sepharov
[60:39] okay 10 sepharov is just the 10 aspects
[60:41] of god I I I don't want to get too
[60:43] complicated okay but like the simple
[60:44] story is um god is the will to bestow
[60:49] the will the will to love and therefore
[60:52] god must give himself to another person.
[60:55] Therefore, God creates Adam and Kenmon,
[60:57] the first man. And Adam Kman is the will
[61:00] to receive the ego, right? And so God is
[61:06] maning himself into Adam Kmon for the
[61:08] 10th Sephro and trying to bestow his
[61:11] wisdom, his benevolence, his love onto
[61:13] Anakon. The problem though is that Anmon
[61:20] because he's the will to receive doesn't
[61:23] understand why God is doing this. Right?
[61:26] And so the example is let's just say I
[61:29] invite you to my house for dinner and
[61:34] I'm really happy you're coming. So I
[61:36] cook you like a 10 course banquet. Okay.
[61:41] It's like everything you could possibly
[61:42] imagine. The entire apartment is filled
[61:45] with all this sumptuous food. Okay. You
[61:47] come in and you're like, "Oh my god."
[61:51] You're shocked. Okay. Cuz it's so
[61:53] generous. It's too generous. You know
[61:55] like he wants to borrow money from me so
[61:59] you run away.
[62:01] So that's a problem where Adam Kenmmont
[62:03] doesn't understand the generosity of God
[62:06] that God is pure love, pure generosity,
[62:08] pure benevolence. So Adam Ken turns away
[62:12] from God which breaks the world. Okay.
[62:16] And that's the story of Adam and Eve.
[62:18] Adam and Eve were immature. They didn't
[62:21] appreciate the generous generous
[62:23] generosity of God. So they look for an
[62:24] excuse to turn away from God and the
[62:27] best excuse was to eat the fruit. Okay.
[62:31] But then this tells us this. This tells
[62:34] us that
[62:36] um the purpose of the world is to return
[62:40] to God. And the the way to return to God
[62:43] um is by
[62:46] redeeming ourselves and appreciating the
[62:49] generosity, love and mercy of God. And
[62:54] the best way to do that is by cleansing
[62:58] ourselves of our own ego. Okay? Doesn't
[63:01] make sense, right? That is the basis of
[63:04] the Jewish faith. And this is um um
[63:08] explained in the Cabala the Zohar.
[63:13] Okay,
[63:15] the Zohar um which was in the 13th
[63:17] century written by a man named Moses de
[63:20] Leon. Okay, it was a work of divine
[63:22] inspiration. He's trying to bring in
[63:23] hermetic philosophy to explain the
[63:25] Bible. It's become the basis of the
[63:26] cabala ever since. All right. Now,
[63:28] there's a very important idea in all of
[63:30] this which is the Messiah.
[63:34] Okay. The Messiah is this the Messiah is
[63:39] a is a man that's a spiritual connection
[63:41] to God. So the Messiah can do things
[63:44] that uh ordinary man cannot do. Okay.
[63:48] All right. So for so the world is not
[63:52] destroyed because we being selfish have
[63:54] turned away from God. Okay. And now the
[63:56] world is broken.
[63:59] Our destiny is to repair the world.
[64:02] Something they call tikum aloom. Okay.
[64:04] Tikum aloom. to repair the world.
[64:08] And again, because the Jewish faith is
[64:10] so diverse, you have different
[64:11] interpretations of this, but one radical
[64:14] interpretation is the Messiah will be
[64:16] the force that will repair the world.
[64:20] Okay. How
[64:23] um yeah,
[64:24] >> I just want to clarify again and I
[64:25] apologize. So, if you imagine it's a
[64:27] vessel, right? And God is pouring his
[64:30] infinite love into the vessel and at one
[64:33] point the vessel can't handle it and it
[64:35] shatters into pieces all over uh the
[64:38] world all over uh everywhere. So the
[64:40] idea is that the Messiah will gather
[64:43] those pieces together to recreate that.
[64:46] >> Yeah. Okay. Yeah. That's that is a
[64:48] standard explanation. Okay. But I I need
[64:50] to explain what this means. Okay. So
[64:52] idea is the vessel is broken. God is
[64:56] splintered throughout the world. Okay.
[64:58] Now, the Messiah, his job is to go
[65:02] everywhere and find the sparks of light
[65:05] to reassemble the vessel that God can
[65:07] come. Okay. You're like, "Okay, well,
[65:10] sure, but what does this mean?" Okay.
[65:13] Okay. And again, the interpretation is
[65:15] different, but let me tell you what I
[65:16] believe it means. What this is really
[65:19] saying is this. The Jews are the chosen
[65:23] people.
[65:24] Therefore, each and every Jew has a
[65:27] spark of God in him or her. Okay? Not
[65:30] non-Jews, but only Jews.
[65:34] The brillian vessels means the Jewish
[65:36] people have now scattered everywhere in
[65:39] the world. The Jews are among the
[65:41] Muslims. They're among the Christians.
[65:43] They're among the Chinese. They're among
[65:44] the Japanese. They're among the
[65:45] Africans. Who knows? Okay. But they are
[65:49] scattered throughout the world. It is
[65:52] the job of the Messiah
[65:54] to go to every corner of the world, meet
[65:59] every person and find the spark of light
[66:02] in that person. Why? Because all humans
[66:06] who were sparks of light have forgotten
[66:09] they were sparks of light. Okay? It is
[66:12] and and like how do you know if they're
[66:15] a spark of light? If they convert back
[66:17] to Judaism. You understand that is what
[66:21] they really believe. Okay? And I'm not
[66:23] I'm not saying all of them. I'm saying
[66:25] like a fringe minority of them believe
[66:29] of them believe this. Okay? That Jews
[66:34] are hidden amongst all of humanity.
[66:36] There's 8 billion. There might be a
[66:38] million Jews. Who knows? Okay. But these
[66:41] are sparks of light and therefore they
[66:42] need to be found. They need to be
[66:44] brought back into the community. And
[66:47] when they're together and they redeem
[66:50] themselves, then God can come to this
[66:52] world and the world will be saved. Okay?
[66:56] And that is the mission of Sabai Zevi,
[66:59] right? Why did he convert? Because there
[67:01] were sparks of light in the in the
[67:03] Islamic world. That's why he had to
[67:05] convert. It was not enough to save the
[67:08] Jews. He has to save every possible
[67:10] spark of light. Okay? And that's why
[67:14] Zevi had to convert. But then the
[67:16] question then is how about the
[67:18] Christians? Well, that's that's where we
[67:20] get Jacob Frank. Okay, so Jacob Frank
[67:23] considered himself the reincarnation of
[67:26] Zevi. Something something um that I
[67:28] forgot to mention about about the Jewish
[67:30] faith is the Jewish faith doesn't
[67:32] actually have a concept of heaven
[67:33] because this earth is meant to be
[67:35] heaven. Okay, it's meant to be the home
[67:37] of God. But they have a concept of
[67:39] reincarnation.
[67:41] All right? So Zebie when he dies, he
[67:43] just reincarnates as a different person.
[67:45] Okay. And they keep on doing this for
[67:46] all eternity until they are able to
[67:48] reassemble the vessel and bring God to
[67:50] earth. Okay. So, Zab Zevi converted to
[67:54] Islam. Then his reincarnation called
[67:56] Jacob Frank, he he converted to the
[68:01] Catholic religion. Does that make sense?
[68:04] Because they just spread themselves
[68:05] everywhere.
[68:08] Okay. So and then Jacob Frank is like
[68:11] okay
[68:13] someday Z start this process of
[68:15] redeeming humanity
[68:18] but now we must finish it. So he told
[68:20] his followers what we must do now is
[68:23] convert to every possible religion
[68:27] including
[68:29] Islam of course but also the Catholic
[68:31] religion including the Freemasons
[68:33] including a new thing called hidic
[68:36] Judaism.
[68:38] Okay, because at this time in history
[68:40] Judaism is a very popular thing and his
[68:43] Judais Judaism is very similar to the
[68:47] Protestant faith which is they believe
[68:48] in the direct connection to God
[68:51] and if you truly believe in God then you
[68:54] will celebrate God in all aspects of
[68:56] life. Okay, be joyful. Don't be afraid.
[68:59] Be joyful that God
[69:02] is coming back. Okay. And so 17 f so now
[69:06] you have 17 fragism which believes like
[69:09] it is responsibility of true believers
[69:11] to convert to different fa faves to
[69:13] infiltrate them
[69:16] in order to find the sparks of light and
[69:18] then to reassemble the sparks of light
[69:21] in order to have god come to the world
[69:24] and bring eternal peace to the world.
[69:26] Okay, that's the very basis of what they
[69:28] believe. Sin is a very important concept
[69:32] here. Okay? Because sometime Zebi just
[69:35] says that sin can be ignored. You don't
[69:39] have to follow these dietary laws. You
[69:41] don't you can actually eat pork. You can
[69:43] convert to Islam. Doesn't matter. What
[69:46] matters is your heart. What matters is
[69:48] your relationship with God. Okay? That's
[69:50] what matters.
[69:52] >> The meta mission was to ultimately
[69:54] convert back.
[69:55] >> Excuse me. the met like
[69:58] they're withdrawing sin but then all but
[70:00] then the meta mission is to ultimately
[70:02] bring them back.
[70:04] >> Yes, that's right. That's right. Okay.
[70:06] All right. So sin. Okay. So now the
[70:09] story gets really interesting. Okay.
[70:12] Because you have this really crazy
[70:16] French group um amongst the Jews
[70:20] called Frankism. And what I'll show you
[70:23] now is through their understanding of
[70:25] sin, they're now able to conquer the
[70:27] European nobility. All right?
[70:31] Because remember this in the beginning
[70:33] of our lecture, in the beginning of the
[70:34] story, if you are a powerful person, you
[70:37] got there through sin, right? But then
[70:40] you have to explain to yourself why do
[70:42] you have the superpower?
[70:44] And now the seven fus frag has come
[70:47] along and explain to you why you need
[70:49] the superpower in order to complete the
[70:53] end of days in order to bring God to
[70:56] earth. So it's God who gave the
[70:58] superpower because you are a spark of
[71:01] light that God needed in order to redeem
[71:03] all humanity. Does that make sense?
[71:06] >> All right. Okay.
[71:09] All right. So this the Frankus they
[71:12] convert there were Jews who convert to
[71:13] the Catholic religion for the European
[71:16] nobility this was great okay the
[71:19] Austrian Hungarians the Russians they
[71:21] were like for the longest time they
[71:23] struggled with the Jewish question and
[71:24] now the 17th Frank has provided a
[71:26] solution which is conversion right so
[71:30] Jacob Frank who was you know not
[71:34] respected among the Jews he was well
[71:36] respected amongst the European nobility
[71:38] he was given his own title. He had his
[71:41] own castle. He had his own army, his own
[71:44] militia. But not only that, but his
[71:46] followers spread and became part of the
[71:50] European nobility as well, including the
[71:52] Rothschild family. Okay? Including who
[71:55] else? The Epsian family. Jeff Epstein
[71:58] guys. All right? These bankers who are
[72:02] Jewish, they all separate Frankus.
[72:05] Because if you think about it, if you
[72:07] are a capitalist, suddenly Frankenism
[72:11] gives you the philosophy, the religion,
[72:14] the the ideology to reduce all the
[72:16] anxiety created by your wealth, power,
[72:19] and status. Right? So many friends tell
[72:23] you one,
[72:25] sin doesn't matter. Okay? Sin is a good
[72:28] thing because sin allows you to do God's
[72:33] work. Number two is you were given the
[72:36] superpower to commit all sorts of sin in
[72:39] order to fulfill God's mission which is
[72:42] to bring about the end end of days.
[72:45] Okay. Okay guys um so I I want to talk
[72:50] about Jeffrey Epstein now because like
[72:52] once we understand this theory it's
[72:54] actually a lot easier to understand what
[72:56] happened on Epson Island. All right. So
[73:00] a lot of people believe that Jerry
[73:02] Epstein was a Mossad agent who was
[73:06] trying to blackmail the American elite.
[73:09] But according to this theory, that's not
[73:10] what happened at all. Okay. So let me
[73:13] explain to you what actually happened uh
[73:17] according to this theory. All right. So
[73:20] basically
[73:22] um in the word of the elite, the more
[73:25] you're able to sin, the more power you
[73:29] have.
[73:31] Okay?
[73:32] Um
[73:34] and the more your power you have, the
[73:38] more control
[73:40] you want over
[73:43] the world. And if you are a powerful
[73:47] person
[73:49] um one major problem you have is
[73:54] love.
[73:56] Okay. And the reason why is that love
[73:59] and power are in contradiction with each
[74:02] other.
[74:04] If you have a lot of power first of all
[74:06] it reduce your capacity to love but also
[74:10] makes you wonder
[74:12] who truly loves me. Right? If you're a
[74:15] billionaire, everyone's nice to you. So,
[74:18] like, how do you know who's really
[74:20] really who likes you? Okay, it's a huge
[74:22] problem if you're a billionaire. Okay?
[74:24] And so, Jeffy Epstein um the island the
[74:28] entire project was was to help these
[74:31] billionaires, these powerful people try
[74:33] to resolve this issue. Okay? So, again,
[74:38] if you're a billionaire, and again, we
[74:39] we we have the mind billionaire. All you
[74:41] care about is control, right? But you
[74:44] want love and and you don't really
[74:46] appreciate this contradiction. You think
[74:47] that if I spend enough money, I can
[74:49] resolve this contradiction, right? So
[74:51] what were they trying to do? Well, um
[74:54] first of all, it was clear that the
[74:57] women who were being trafficked on Epson
[74:59] Island, they were of a certain age
[75:01] group. Okay, they were, I think, between
[75:04] 14 and 17.
[75:08] Okay, this is a very important age
[75:09] group. Um
[75:12] so
[75:14] the reason why you pick these um of this
[75:18] age group is they are malible,
[75:21] right? If you're like in your 20s and
[75:24] you're a woman, you're a beautiful
[75:25] woman. Well, you've had have you you
[75:27] have have had a lot of experience with
[75:29] men, okay? You know how to deal with
[75:32] men, you know how to manipulate men, you
[75:33] you know how to seduce men, and you're
[75:35] very skeptical towards men, right? It's
[75:39] hard for you to fall in love. So if you
[75:43] are a billionaire, you could date a
[75:46] movie star. You could date a model, but
[75:50] they are highmaintenance. They're a pain
[75:52] in the ass and you don't even know if
[75:55] they truly love you. Okay? But if you
[75:59] target women who are between 14 and 17,
[76:03] well, that gives you more control over
[76:05] them. that allows you to
[76:09] um get get them to love you, right?
[76:12] These are virgins.
[76:15] Okay? And so that's the idea of Epstein
[76:19] Island. These were just billionaires who
[76:21] are lonely
[76:23] because
[76:24] um they're too powerful and no one likes
[76:27] them and they were just looking for
[76:30] love. And from from my perspective,
[76:32] that's actually a much easier
[76:33] explanation than the idea that Jeff
[76:35] Epstein was this massage agent looking
[76:37] to blackmail
[76:39] uh people like Bill Clinton. Okay, I
[76:41] hate to say this, but like um it's
[76:45] because they wanted power and control
[76:50] that they enter politics, right? But why
[76:53] do they enter politics?
[76:55] Often it's because they're lonely and
[76:57] they wanted to look for love, right? And
[76:59] they they felt that if I the more power
[77:01] I have, the more I'm able to um find
[77:06] true love. And I I know this kind this
[77:08] sounds kind of silly, but like
[77:10] billionaires the psychology is kind of
[77:13] perverse. Okay. So if we use the theory
[77:16] that that we just discussed for the past
[77:19] hour, it helps us better understand.
[77:22] It also helps us better understand why
[77:24] Israel is doing what Israel is doing
[77:26] throughout the Middle East.
[77:28] Okay? because it is committing genocide
[77:30] in Gaza. It's pissing off everyone in
[77:33] the world. Um but according to their
[77:36] esquetology, according to 17 fkism, this
[77:39] is all part of the plan to save the
[77:42] world. Okay. To repair the world, what
[77:45] they call take them alum. Okay. All
[77:47] right. So, um
[77:50] uh I've already made this and I'm sure
[77:52] you guys have a lot of questions. So,
[77:53] what we'll do is um we'll take three at
[77:57] a time because we only have one mic.
[77:59] Okay. So, what what I'm going to do is
[78:00] I'm going to pass the mic around and if
[78:05] you and if you want to make a comment or
[78:08] ask a question, you can do so and we'll
[78:09] do three at a time. Okay? And then I'll
[78:12] answer it once. Okay? So, could you pass
[78:14] it for for me?
[78:15] >> I would I wanted to ask a question also.
[78:17] >> Okay. All right. All right. So, you'll
[78:18] start Thomas and then and then and then
[78:19] we'll pass it on. Okay.
[78:20] >> Okay.
[78:21] >> Three time. Okay.
[78:22] >> Hello, professor. So the girl talks a
[78:24] lot about sexual energy like for
[78:26] instance um like an like an obsession I
[78:29] I think about um what is his name is the
[78:31] roy alistister cor and u especially in
[78:34] ritual and practice but what about
[78:37] sexual energy mastery have you heard
[78:39] about sim retention or something like
[78:41] this montia a tai master tism talks a
[78:46] lot about it so just want to take to
[78:48] have your input input
[78:51] >> you know you know what I'm actually
[78:52] sorry I I changed my mind. Okay, I this
[78:54] is actually a really important question.
[78:55] So, I'll answer it first, otherwise I
[78:58] I'll just forget and this might actually
[79:00] help um you guys better understand
[79:01] what's going on. So, sex is a really
[79:04] important concept in the Cabala. This is
[79:07] something that's not actually
[79:09] appreciated. Okay, so S Zev and Jacob
[79:13] Frank were all very sexual sexual people
[79:16] like they love orgies and they were um
[79:22] very prom
[79:24] um I mean uh yeah so um Jacob Frank was
[79:29] just a peasant. He had no power and the
[79:31] one way that he was able to slowly
[79:32] accumulate power was he had a very
[79:34] beautiful wife and he actually shared
[79:37] this wife with nobility and that's how
[79:39] he was able to get a lot of patronage.
[79:42] Okay. Um and so
[79:46] um I mean like I don't want to sound too
[79:48] derogatory but that's a major difference
[79:51] between the Jewish faith and the
[79:53] Christian faith. Okay. Most religions
[79:55] believe that the body is of sin. Right?
[79:59] The spirit is is of purity. The body is
[80:02] of of sin. Right? When in the Jewish
[80:04] religion, they believe that the body is
[80:08] also um
[80:11] um of God. And so at the end of days, in
[80:14] the Christian religion, you're taught
[80:16] that your body will dissipate. You'll be
[80:18] pure spirit in order to better celebrate
[80:20] God. But in the Jewish religion, at the
[80:24] end of days, uh at the at the ad
[80:26] judgment day, we'll keep our bodies.
[80:28] Why? to enjoy the world, okay? To have
[80:31] sex, to um to enjoy the world, okay?
[80:34] Because the body is a source of
[80:36] pleasure. All right? So, um sex is
[80:40] actually a lot more important concept in
[80:43] Judaism than it is in um uh
[80:47] Christianity. And so, like you're a
[80:49] Christian and you go and you learn about
[80:51] the Jewish religion, there's a lot of
[80:53] weird things that you can't actually
[80:54] accept. Okay? So um um one concept that
[80:59] they have in the Jewish religion is
[81:03] Israel is the bride and God's the groom
[81:07] right so at the end of the days what's
[81:09] going to happen is uh when all the
[81:11] sparks of light are brought together and
[81:14] the and the vessel is recreated that's a
[81:16] bride right that's a bride which means
[81:20] what which means that God's going to
[81:21] come and have sex with the bride okay
[81:23] God's literally gonna come and have sex
[81:25] with Israel Oh, all right. It's again
[81:28] again like I I I don't go too much into
[81:30] this, but like know that sex is a very
[81:31] important concept in the um Jewish
[81:35] faith. And also has to do with the
[81:37] cabala. Okay. So if you look at the
[81:39] cabala, the main organizing principle
[81:43] of the cabala is um the idea of
[81:49] um thesis, symphysis
[81:52] and
[81:54] sorry thesis, antithesis, symphysis.
[81:57] All right? And what they teach you in
[81:59] the Jewish religion is true wisdom is to
[82:03] go from one extreme to another. Right?
[82:06] So maybe in the Catholic in the
[82:08] Aristotalian tradition, you're taught to
[82:11] live a life of moderation, right? In the
[82:14] Jewish faith, in the Cabal, what what
[82:16] they teach you is like that's nonsense.
[82:17] You you'll get nowhere if you just
[82:20] follow a life of moderation. What you
[82:22] have to do is go from one extreme to the
[82:24] other extreme. Okay? That's why you sin
[82:26] because sin is a path to wisdom. If you
[82:30] do a lot of sin and you go into the
[82:33] darkness, then you're able to come out
[82:35] into the light. Okay. So, thesis,
[82:38] interfaces, symphysis, and this is the
[82:40] main movement of the universe. You think
[82:43] about it, this is essentially what sex
[82:44] is, right? It's it's the generative
[82:47] principle. Generative principle, you
[82:49] know. Okay. So, there's a lot of sexual
[82:51] imagery in uh the Jewish uh religion in
[82:56] the Cabala especially. All right. So,
[82:59] and then the question is also all right.
[83:02] So also Cruy is working from the
[83:06] tradition of the Cabala
[83:09] and he's focused on sex magic. Okay. All
[83:13] right. So,
[83:16] um,
[83:19] going back to the Jewish faith, have you
[83:21] ever as have you ever asked yourself why
[83:24] is it that you have
[83:27] thousands of Orthodox Jews, male, who
[83:31] spend their entire life just studying
[83:34] the Torah, right? Especially Hesetic
[83:37] Jews. Like, apparently there's Jew
[83:40] Jewish community in Montreal, right?
[83:43] They don't work. All they do for entire
[83:45] life is to study the Cabala. Okay? What
[83:48] they're really trying to do is they're
[83:51] trying to manifest God, right? What they
[83:55] believe is if body, spirit, and soul are
[84:01] inter interconnected and they
[84:03] correspond, then if you're if you're
[84:06] able to use your consciousness in a
[84:07] certain way and direct it, then you're
[84:08] able to change the nature of reality
[84:11] itself. Okay? This is what we call
[84:12] manifestation,
[84:14] right?
[84:18] And what Asher Kohley believes is
[84:22] if the nature of the universe is sexual,
[84:25] right? If consciousness is sexual and we
[84:28] can manifest
[84:30] um our consciousness into reality. Okay?
[84:33] We can implant our conscious into
[84:35] reality. Now, the best way to do that is
[84:37] through sex, right? So, so what he's
[84:40] saying is this. Sex is a form of
[84:42] meditation.
[84:44] And if you actually look at his sexual
[84:46] practices, it's actually really really
[84:47] hard. First of all, you have to have sex
[84:49] for three hours. Okay, that's that's a
[84:53] lot of work, man. Sex for three hours.
[84:55] And second of all, you cannot ejaculate.
[84:58] Okay, you cannot ejaculate. And third of
[84:59] all, both partners have to be
[85:02] synchronized, right? So, so it might
[85:04] take years and years for you to work up
[85:08] to that ability. Okay? And it could be
[85:10] male, it could be homosexual sex, it
[85:12] doesn't really matter. Okay? But you
[85:13] have to have two partners. And these two
[85:15] partners need to be thinking the same
[85:18] thought together. Okay? And you do that
[85:21] through ritual practice, right? When you
[85:23] through ritual practice, um, you're able
[85:25] to synchronize thoughts. And during a
[85:28] sex uh during the act of sex you're
[85:31] thinking the same thought for the three
[85:33] hours even longer and then it's able to
[85:37] implant itself in the universe because
[85:38] the act of sex is the act of the
[85:41] movement of the universe. Okay, does
[85:43] that make sense? So you're actually in
[85:44] you're penetrating into the very fabric
[85:47] of the universe and you do that uh then
[85:51] your dreams can come true. Okay. So you
[85:54] you you manifest a thought like I want
[85:57] to become a millionaire. Okay. You have
[85:59] sex
[86:00] um and then uh this is implanted in the
[86:03] universe and universe will be uh
[86:07] affected and the universe will change
[86:08] the way that allows you to manifest this
[86:11] reality in in your everyday life. Does
[86:13] that make sense?
[86:15] >> Okay. All right. Yeah. But it has to do
[86:17] with the cabal and and the Jewish faith.
[86:19] Okay. and and and so like one idea that
[86:22] you guys need to appreciate is ideas do
[86:24] not work in isolation from each other.
[86:26] If there's a protestant reformation in
[86:29] Europe, it's have a huge impact on the
[86:31] Jewish faith. Okay? And this Jewish
[86:34] faith, the change changes to that will
[86:35] also impact Judaism. Sorry, will impact
[86:39] the Christianity in Europe. Okay? It is
[86:41] is what we call synretatism. Okay?
[86:43] Synretatism.
[86:48] Okay? And this is what as Cley would
[86:52] say, everything in universe is sexual,
[86:54] right? So ideas will will have sex with
[86:58] each other and break and breed new ideas
[87:00] and they'll just implant themselves
[87:02] throughout the the world and that's why
[87:05] ideas are the most powerful things in
[87:06] the world.
[87:08] Okay. All right. Next question. Uh you
[87:11] Yes.
[87:13] >> Yeah. Thank you, Professor Chang. Um
[87:15] just want to ask I was watching your um
[87:17] debate with uh Nick Fuentes and one of
[87:21] the um I think one of the contentions
[87:23] that I think you were mentioning where
[87:25] uh he was pissing you off um during the
[87:28] I think it was during this discussion
[87:30] about the uh Sam Francus. Uh there was
[87:33] one thing that I think um the moderator
[87:35] brought up um that I I never really
[87:38] thought of myself and maybe it's just
[87:40] cuz I never really understood it as
[87:42] much. um what is a Jew, right? Like
[87:45] there is the ethnicity and there is the
[87:48] Judaism. And I think you explained it
[87:50] there a little bit, but I feel like that
[87:53] is a little bit maybe if people don't
[87:55] understand like maybe myself, is there
[87:58] like a really lineage or is it kind of
[88:01] all over the place like you were
[88:02] mentioning and how does that factor into
[88:05] what we discussed today?
[88:07] >> Okay. Yeah. Thank you. All right. So
[88:10] this is one this is probably the most
[88:12] complicated question in history. Okay,
[88:13] what is a Jew? Um and the reason why is
[88:18] historically identities, nationalities,
[88:20] they change over time. But the Jewish
[88:23] people for the reason they insist that
[88:26] it does not change that um they're the
[88:28] same people that they are 3,000 years
[88:31] ago. And that's not at all true. Okay,
[88:33] you talk talk to any scholars, they will
[88:35] tell you like the religion of Judaism
[88:38] 3,000 years ago is is radically
[88:40] different from what Jews practice today.
[88:43] All right. Also, um the like as I
[88:47] mentioned before, there is a Jewish
[88:49] diaspora and there's a tremendous range
[88:52] of belief in this diaspora. Okay, so
[88:55] there's no one core Jewish um identity.
[88:58] Okay. But but but let me give give a
[89:00] brief background
[89:02] into the Jewish faith. Okay. All right.
[89:06] So,
[89:08] um
[89:10] what Jews believe is the kingdom of
[89:13] David
[89:16] was the peak of Jewish civilization.
[89:19] Okay.
[89:20] Um and this happened about a th00and
[89:24] BCE. This is when a lot of scholars
[89:26] believe that the Bible was was was being
[89:29] composed. Okay. Now, what's really
[89:32] important for us to appreciate is what
[89:34] the kingdom kingdom of David was.
[89:37] Um, so the kingdom of David was in a
[89:39] place called the Levant.
[89:42] And the Levant historically
[89:45] has been the most important geography in
[89:48] human history. Why? Because the Levant
[89:50] is a crossroads of three major empires.
[89:54] They are Egypt which has historically
[89:56] been the wealthiest part of the world.
[89:59] Okay, Egypt, Mesopotamia which is has
[90:03] always which was considered for the
[90:05] longest time to be the most innovative
[90:06] part of the world. That's where the
[90:08] Samrians come from. Okay, Mesopotentia
[90:10] and then Anatolia. So these are the
[90:12] three wealthiest empires in human
[90:16] history
[90:17] for most of human history and the Levant
[90:20] is where they met.
[90:22] And so these three empires struggled for
[90:25] control over the Levant because
[90:28] strategically it's it's the most
[90:29] important part of the world. Right?
[90:32] The kingdom of David emerged because of
[90:35] a historical accident called the bronze
[90:36] age collapse. Okay. The bronze age
[90:38] collapse happened about the 11th 12th
[90:41] century. And the branch age collapse
[90:44] basically meant the demise of empire.
[90:47] Okay. These empires became extremely
[90:48] weak and they were not able to exert
[90:51] control over the periphery, the Levant.
[90:54] And this allowed for new groups to
[90:57] emerge in the Levant. And one of these
[90:59] groups are called the Israelites.
[91:08] Um if you look at the lavant in here
[91:11] about um 1,00 BCE, it is a hodgepodge of
[91:17] e of e of e of e of e of e of e of e of
[91:17] e of e of ethnicities. Okay, it's almost
[91:19] like Montreal or Canada. Why? Because
[91:22] there's wealth in Canada. So different
[91:24] people come to extract this wealth,
[91:26] right? There are a lot of immigrants.
[91:27] Well, the same thing in the leavant
[91:28] where the Levant was important
[91:31] strategically. So you had Greeks, okay?
[91:34] You had uh Egyptians. You had
[91:38] uh people from Mesopotamia. You had
[91:40] people from all all around the world
[91:44] converging in the Lavant. Okay. And now
[91:49] with these empires that traditionally
[91:51] control the Lavant, Egypt, Anatolian
[91:53] must receding, these different groups
[91:56] got together and they fought amongst
[91:57] themselves. Okay. And um
[92:02] for the Israelites, you did have um you
[92:06] had Greeks. They were called the
[92:08] Philistines. Okay. Uh you had um Canon
[92:11] Can Canonites. And Canaanites are just
[92:13] people who lived in the area. Then you
[92:15] had Hitites from Anatolia. But then you
[92:18] also had Egyptians.
[92:20] And who are these Egyptians? They were
[92:22] priests. Okay. So uh there were there
[92:26] was in Egypt at this time different
[92:28] religious sects and they fought fought
[92:30] amongst themselves because they
[92:31] worshiped different dietes and the ones
[92:33] who lost were banished to the lot. Okay.
[92:36] So with the branch collapse um they had
[92:39] to form different coalitions and so what
[92:42] is the way to form a coalition?
[92:46] The best way to do that is by forming a
[92:48] narrative that tells a story of all
[92:51] these different groups. Okay? And we
[92:53] call this the Bible today,
[92:58] right? And if you actually look at the
[93:00] Bible, what you'll find is different
[93:03] people from different regions all
[93:05] participating in the founding of Israel,
[93:08] right? Abraham is from Mesopotamia. Then
[93:12] you have Isaac, you have Jacob from
[93:14] different places. Moses is from where?
[93:17] Egypt. Okay. So the Bible it is meant to
[93:22] create a narrative that combines the
[93:24] different ethnicities into a new people
[93:26] called the Israelites.
[93:30] Um also by by the way guys just just
[93:32] just to be clear the Bible at this time
[93:34] is very different from the Bible we have
[93:35] today. Okay. Um
[93:38] also
[93:41] um
[93:43] the Israelites are extremely
[93:47] progressive, open, tolerant people. Why?
[93:51] Because you have different ethnicities.
[93:52] Okay? So you have different ethnicities.
[93:54] Therefore, you need to worship different
[93:55] gods. So the theme of the Israelites at
[93:57] this time that's very different from
[93:59] Jews today is the Israelites were
[94:02] polytheistic.
[94:05] Okay? Polytheistic. And we know because
[94:08] there's overwhelming evidence the
[94:12] Israelites were polytheistic. If you
[94:14] look at the Bible, the word they use for
[94:17] God is Elohim, right? Elohim is Hebrew
[94:21] for gods, not God. Gods.
[94:26] Um they were worshiping three major gods
[94:29] at this time including Yahweh, Baal, and
[94:32] Asher. We know because we find these
[94:35] statues amongst Israelite settlements in
[94:37] Egypt. Okay. So the Jewish faith at this
[94:41] time it is really different from Jew
[94:45] Judaism
[94:47] uh today. So what changed? Um what
[94:50] changed is
[94:53] that these empires Egypt and Anatolia
[94:56] and Mesopenia were exerting themselves
[94:58] back again. Okay. They were coming back
[94:59] and they need control over the Levant.
[95:02] In order to exert control over the
[95:03] lavand, they needed to control the
[95:06] Israelites. The Israelites had this
[95:08] proud tradition
[95:10] and they refused to be controlled. And
[95:13] these different empires tried different
[95:14] solutions like, "Okay, we'll bribe you."
[95:17] Didn't really work. We'll kill you.
[95:19] Doesn't really work. We'll take you
[95:20] hostage. Okay, that that's what the
[95:22] Babylonians did. Um, and something
[95:24] called the Babylonian captivity. Okay,
[95:26] and they realized none of this works.
[95:28] They're like, "Screw this. We'll just
[95:30] kill their god." Okay. And so they
[95:31] burned down the temple. Okay. And this
[95:33] this created something called the
[95:34] Babylonian exile.
[95:37] The Jews in the Babylon exile because of
[95:41] their proud tradition. They still prayed
[95:44] to Jerusalem.
[95:45] And then um the Babylonians were
[95:48] conquered by the Persians of led by Cyus
[95:52] the Great. And Sars the Great basically
[95:55] said to the Jews, I'll allow you to go
[95:57] back to the Levant as long as you swear
[96:01] loyalty to me. Okay? And how do you
[96:04] swear loyalty to me? By not getting
[96:06] along with other people in the region.
[96:09] And so this is the beginning of of what
[96:11] what we call Judaism. Before it Juda
[96:15] Before there was no Judaism, now you
[96:17] have the Jews.
[96:20] And the Jews were heavily influenced by
[96:23] Zoroastrianism which was the official
[96:24] religion of the Persians. Okay. So now
[96:27] the Jews become first of all
[96:28] monotheistic
[96:30] and they also become segregated from
[96:33] from the rest of the community. Okay.
[96:35] They become an enclosed community and
[96:37] the way they did that was by practicing
[96:40] um racial purity.
[96:44] Basically you were not allowed to marry
[96:46] a foreign woman. If you if you were a
[96:48] Jewish person and you were married to a
[96:51] foreign woman, you had to divorce her.
[96:53] And from now on, you're not allowed to
[96:56] marry anyone different from you. Okay.
[97:00] And uh did you have a
[97:02] >> I just wanted to uh I had a thought. You
[97:05] know, the modern state of Israel is very
[97:07] much like what you're describing. said
[97:09] it's an amalgam of all these different
[97:11] people who are combined by this nation
[97:14] national idea
[97:15] >> and uh language and so on and so forth.
[97:18] So the Jews were basically a tool of
[97:19] empire. Okay, it's is this is a way to
[97:22] exert control over the Leavant, right?
[97:24] And how how do you control the Levant if
[97:26] you are an empire? Divide and rule. You
[97:28] you implant a foreign people which will
[97:31] stir all sorts of problems with the
[97:33] local people. You tell the these these
[97:36] um um people you're special. Therefore,
[97:39] you can't intermar with these other
[97:41] people and you have a divine mission
[97:43] which is to bring God to earth. So it's
[97:46] no different from Israel today and it's
[97:48] just how empires behave. Okay. So Israel
[97:50] was a creation of of course the British
[97:52] Empire which was trying to sow as much
[97:54] discord and discontent in the Middle
[97:56] East as possible because that's where
[97:58] all the oil comes from and that's and
[98:01] also uh in terms of trade uh the law is
[98:04] very important as well. Okay. It's it's
[98:05] really the center of the world in terms
[98:07] of global trade. Okay. It's no
[98:09] different. Okay. Um so then um the Jews
[98:15] start to prosper and then um after the
[98:20] uh Persians
[98:22] came the Greeks. Okay. And then the
[98:26] Jews became
[98:29] intermarried with the the Henistic
[98:32] world. Okay. And during this this period
[98:34] about 30 20 300 B.CE is when we think
[98:36] the Bible was fully compiled. All right.
[98:39] If you look at a lot of elements in the
[98:41] Bible, a lot of it was influenced
[98:43] heavily by Hennessy culture, especially
[98:46] the story of Moses. Okay, so Moses, a
[98:48] lot of scholars believe it was not a
[98:50] real person. Um, but and he he probably
[98:54] exists as a concept before, but he was
[98:56] actually fleshed out during the the
[99:00] hellistic period. Okay. Um and then of
[99:04] course after the Greeks came the Romans
[99:07] which then destroyed the temple and
[99:08] which which um created the Jewish
[99:11] diaspora and then well the temple that
[99:13] led to uh rebbitic authority being
[99:16] created. So all I'm saying is for all
[99:20] this time the Jewish identity is being
[99:22] changed. Okay? And so but the Jews for
[99:25] the reason insists no this is
[99:27] continuous. If you talk to a rabbi,
[99:29] he'll be like, "Well, you know, if you
[99:30] go back 2,000 years, um, if a Jew would
[99:34] translate 2,000 years back to the
[99:36] kingdom of David, that person would feel
[99:38] at home." No, he won't. Okay. No. No.
[99:42] It's a completely different time,
[99:43] different period. Okay. But the main
[99:46] source of Jewish power is the Bible.
[99:48] Because a Bible is it's almost like a
[99:50] collective memory where when you read
[99:52] the Bible, you feel a distinct
[99:55] connection to thousands of years of of
[100:00] history. Okay. All right. Okay. Uh yeah.
[100:06] All right. Um
[100:09] Okay. So you talked about like that
[100:12] initial chapter of Sabatine Frankism
[100:14] where
[100:16] like
[100:19] they branched off from Judaism. It was a
[100:21] revolution and then they infiltrated
[100:24] like the world the rest of the world.
[100:27] Um so I guess I just want to like kind
[100:30] of assess the significance of this
[100:33] movement/religion or ideology. Um
[100:38] it so is is like the greater Israel
[100:40] project kind of the the the the product
[100:43] of that after multiple generations and
[100:46] then
[100:48] and let's just say yeah so that's like
[100:51] the first question and then
[100:55] cuz
[100:57] >> let's ask one question okay like you can
[101:00] here I'll I'll answer this first okay
[101:02] all right
[101:02] >> okay what happened okay So,
[101:07] one thing that we focus too much on is
[101:09] the movement of people, but it's really
[101:11] the movement of ideas that that charge
[101:13] the course of human history. Okay. So,
[101:16] okay, here's what happened. Uh, and I'll
[101:19] I'll try to draw it out for you as as
[101:23] best as possible. Okay. So,
[101:26] historically,
[101:28] you have an elite,
[101:34] okay? And historically the elite got to
[101:38] to where they are because they sin,
[101:40] right? They have no sense of morality.
[101:44] Now historically
[101:47] they this caused a contradiction amongst
[101:50] the elite, right? You know you're you're
[101:52] you're sinning as your superpower to get
[101:54] to to get to where you are, but you know
[101:56] it's bad. Okay? The Catholic Church told
[101:59] you it was bad. So what do you do? Well,
[102:01] you
[102:03] um you tried to bribe the church and you
[102:07] made confession. You felt bad about it.
[102:09] Okay. Okay. Does that make sense?
[102:11] Historically, this is what happened
[102:12] where the lead did sin, but there were
[102:14] institutions in place to make sure the
[102:17] sin wasn't too bad or at least when they
[102:21] died, they acknowledged that they sinned
[102:23] and they made amends. Okay? And and and
[102:27] so that's the system that that existed
[102:29] for the longest time.
[102:32] Summoning fragmentism is important
[102:35] because now you have a religion
[102:38] or a philosophy that says no. Hey, sin
[102:42] is the path to redemption, right? How do
[102:46] you redeem yourself? By committing as
[102:48] much sin as possible. Because once you
[102:50] get once you commit as much sin as
[102:52] possible, then you'll feel bad and
[102:54] you'll go back and redeem yourself.
[102:56] Okay. The story here that they use is
[102:59] the story of David.
[103:02] All right? So, David, if you know your
[103:04] Bible, is the most beloved of God. Who
[103:07] did God love the most? Not Moses. David,
[103:11] right? Moses was this pure character who
[103:14] never sinned. Yeah, there was the golden
[103:17] calf incident, but that was not his
[103:19] fault, man. That was that that was the
[103:21] the Israelites, right? So, Moses was the
[103:26] most loyal to God,
[103:29] uh, the most deserving of God's love.
[103:32] But God didn't actually like this guy.
[103:33] Okay? God didn't God said to Moses, "You
[103:36] know what, Moses? Um, you worked really
[103:40] hard these 40, 80 years to bring the
[103:43] Israelites from Egypt to the desert, but
[103:49] uh, unfortunately, you will not set foot
[103:51] on the promised land. You will see the
[103:52] promised land, but you will not set foot
[103:54] on the promised land. All of Moses
[103:56] sacrifice and he couldn't even set foot
[103:58] in the promised land. Which is all that
[104:00] he wanted. Okay? He just said to God,
[104:02] "All I want, God, is to die in the
[104:04] promised land." And God says, "Nope,
[104:05] you're not you're not getting that.
[104:06] Okay? I don't care how much sacrifice
[104:08] you made. I don't care how hard you
[104:10] worked. I don't care. You're not setting
[104:12] foot in the promised land." I'll let you
[104:13] see it. Okay? So, that's kind of weird.
[104:16] Then you have David. And David is a
[104:19] jerk. Okay?
[104:21] The guy did what? The guy. Okay. Okay.
[104:24] I'm not like he committed so many sins,
[104:26] but his worst sin, of course, was
[104:28] Bashiba.
[104:29] So, you know, he spots Bashiba bathing
[104:33] naked. He's like, "Well, I I really
[104:35] don't want to sleep with with her." And
[104:36] he's king, so he go sleeps with her.
[104:38] Now, she's pregnant and and she's like,
[104:40] "Okay, well, unfortunately, she's
[104:42] married to a guy, so how how do I
[104:45] resolve this problem? I'll kill the
[104:47] guy." Okay, that's what he does.
[104:50] And God then sends a prophet um uh uh
[104:57] Nathan to say to David, "David, do you
[105:00] feel bad for sleeping with another man's
[105:03] um wife and killing the guy?" David's
[105:05] like, "Not really." Okay. So then God
[105:09] punished David by killing um his first
[105:13] child with Bashibba. And then this
[105:15] forces David into mourning. And during
[105:19] this morning, what happens is the
[105:21] closest relationship between God and
[105:24] David. Okay? So, you have these two
[105:26] competing stories where Moses did
[105:28] nothing wrong where he committed his
[105:30] entire life to serving God and God's
[105:32] like, "I don't even like you, man." And
[105:34] then you have King David who's a
[105:35] complete
[105:37] But this causes uh him to mourn and to
[105:41] reflect and which causes a strong
[105:44] relationship between God and David.
[105:48] Right? And this is the height of the
[105:51] Jewish faith where David was able to
[105:54] redeem himself and then become closer
[105:56] with God. But the message here is to
[105:59] redeem yourself, you first have to sin.
[106:01] So sin as much as you want because then
[106:03] God will lead you back to the path of
[106:05] light. Okay? So this is 17 freakingism.
[106:09] And now the elite are like, "Oh, wait,
[106:11] wait a minute. Now I don't I don't have
[106:13] to feel bad for being an I'll
[106:15] just keep on being an asshole." and then
[106:17] and then eventually um God will punish
[106:19] me. But that's good because then we'll
[106:21] become best friends.
[106:23] Okay, so that's what happened here. And
[106:26] again, what's really important is there
[106:28] it doesn't matter what the title is,
[106:30] right? The elite don't know why they
[106:32] believe what they believe, but they just
[106:34] happen to believe what they believe.
[106:35] They didn't know they're influenced by
[106:36] something,
[106:38] right? But once this idea was implanted,
[106:40] they're like, "Oh, now now I don't have
[106:42] to feel bad for being an asshole." Okay?
[106:45] Whereas before during the medieval
[106:47] period, the Catholic Church made you
[106:50] feel bad for being an Now
[106:52] you're like, "Oh, okay."
[106:54] But you can see how this liberation
[106:58] was from the elite perspective a really
[107:01] good thing. Okay? Because now they're
[107:03] able to amass more power from
[107:05] themselves. There's no more constraint
[107:07] on them. And that's why even though the
[107:10] elite don't know this, they were
[107:12] eventually conquered by Sabatine
[107:14] Frankenson.
[107:15] Okay, they don't know what what this is.
[107:18] They they may not even know who Sepi is.
[107:20] They don't they don't know who Sako
[107:22] Franken is is. But the ideas became
[107:24] implanted them like I like this idea.
[107:26] Okay. And that's how they were able to
[107:28] infiltrate and conquer the Vatican, the
[107:32] Freemasons,
[107:34] the uh Hesetic Judaism, everyone
[107:37] basically. Okay. Because this is a thing
[107:39] that most appeals to the elite.
[107:43] All right. Okay.
[107:46] Okay.
[107:47] >> But then but is is the end versus the
[107:51] end game like real subject like how does
[107:54] that
[107:54] >> Oh, yeah. Yeah. Sorry. Sorry. Yeah.
[107:55] Yeah. Sorry. Yeah. Okay. All right. The
[107:58] problem though is ideas
[108:02] um are living things. Okay. Do you
[108:04] understand? They're they're organisms.
[108:08] Um
[108:08] >> I just bring that up because part of the
[108:10] mission was to bring them back to the
[108:11] day and find the spark of life.
[108:13] >> Exactly. Exactly. Okay. Okay. So,
[108:16] another thing that you you need to
[108:18] appreciate is that ideas
[108:20] are organisms. They're alive. Okay.
[108:24] They're basically like viruses,
[108:27] right? And they're also like complete
[108:28] things onto themselves. So yes, seminary
[108:31] fragmentism did come with the idea of
[108:34] sin which you like, but it also came
[108:36] with other ideas that you may not know
[108:38] of. Okay, which is now going to
[108:39] influence your behavior. And one major
[108:42] idea of course is the cabala and how the
[108:46] end of history is about the reunion of
[108:50] um God and his chosen people, the
[108:52] Israelites. Okay, it doesn't make sense.
[108:55] All right. So now you have this
[108:56] compulsion. You have this inclination.
[108:58] You're like, "Okay, I have the this
[109:02] fragrance the idea is implanted in me.
[109:03] The virus is now implanted in me and now
[109:05] I'm going to move in a certain way even
[109:06] though I don't even know where I'm
[109:07] moving." Okay? And so even though the
[109:12] elite may not agree with the original
[109:15] project, even though they may think it's
[109:17] absurd, they are sympathetic towards it
[109:20] and they will not get in its way. Does
[109:22] that make sense? So all you need is a
[109:24] fanatical
[109:26] minority who are like I want to achieve
[109:28] the greater ritual project but because
[109:30] of the sympathy amongst other the other
[109:32] elite these people are not being stopped
[109:34] and often they're being encouraged.
[109:37] Okay.
[109:39] Okay. Does that make sense?
[109:41] >> Yeah.
[109:42] >> Okay. But like what one one thing that
[109:43] you guys need to appreciate is that
[109:45] ideas or organisms that once they're
[109:47] implanted in you, they change the way
[109:50] you see the world.
[109:52] And these viruses come with a complete
[109:56] story unto themselves. Okay? So it's
[109:58] like you're almost compelled to achieve
[110:00] the story, right? If you believe that
[110:03] sin is a good thing, you're like, then
[110:04] why is sin a good thing? Well, it's
[110:06] because it's going to help us achieve
[110:08] the end times.
[110:10] Okay.
[110:12] I just want to know if there is a link
[110:14] in so I understand how the elite would
[110:16] be like accepting of of this because it
[110:19] washes the sin away but then
[110:23] were the most f because like the the the
[110:26] origin of it was to convert everybody
[110:29] back to Judaism or like like bring that
[110:32] back to to Judah or Israel.
[110:36] And so were the most fervent agents of
[110:38] that just committed to that and
[110:40] remembered that and then passed that
[110:42] story on. And so is is there a link to
[110:46] 17 Frankism and the Greater Israel
[110:48] Project that like some is is the part
[110:51] that I'm trying to understand?
[110:53] >> Okay. Um yeah. Okay. Um so so so so let
[111:00] me repeat this. Okay. First of all,
[111:03] you're assuming this is all conscious.
[111:04] It's not conscious. Okay. No one
[111:07] believes this actually what's going on.
[111:11] Okay? Do you understand?
[111:13] >> There's no one like people are not in a
[111:15] room saying like, "Let's achieve the
[111:16] greater project because we're sabing
[111:17] Frankus." Like they're not wearing
[111:19] labels like I'm Frank so I need to go
[111:20] achieve the greatial project. No one's
[111:22] doing that. Okay.
[111:23] >> All right. Okay. So, we need to figure
[111:26] out why they're behaving the way they
[111:28] are and how things are leading to the
[111:31] great project. And what I'm saying is
[111:35] that
[111:37] it's ideas that drive human history.
[111:40] Okay? Not people. Ideas drive human
[111:43] history. And we are just vessels
[111:46] uh that are moving in a way that these
[111:50] ideas want us to move. We're not
[111:52] conscious of it. Okay? Does that make
[111:54] sense? And what I'm also saying is
[111:57] because of historical accidents, 70
[111:59] something pregnant became implanted in
[112:01] the overall human collective unconscious
[112:06] that's driving history.
[112:09] Okay. So that's why the elite are
[112:12] behaving the way they are. Like why are
[112:14] the elite so shameless, right? There's
[112:18] no guilt in what they do.
[112:21] Why are the elite uh so focused on
[112:24] trying to achieve the greater project?
[112:27] Right? And I'm saying it's because 17
[112:29] fragism the idea has implanted itself in
[112:32] into the elite collective unconscious
[112:34] and it's driving history in a way that
[112:36] no one actually appreciates, no one
[112:37] understands.
[112:39] Okay. Does that make sense?
[112:41] >> Yeah. So then it's possible then like
[112:44] let's say you are an elite and you
[112:46] haven't heard of this but then like you
[112:47] get introduced this idea of like hey
[112:49] >> no no no that's what I'm saying no
[112:51] there's no club we're having Frankus
[112:54] okay I'm just saying like the air you
[112:56] breathe right how how is it that that
[112:59] that you breathe the air you breathe
[113:01] there are elements that are in the air
[113:02] you breathe right why because you have
[113:04] certain factories in Montreal right
[113:07] because you have certain trees in
[113:08] Montreal and that's why you that's why
[113:10] you breathe the air you breathe
[113:12] And the air you breathe is going to
[113:13] affect your body. Right? So all I'm
[113:17] saying is no one no one knows what's
[113:20] going on. You talk to elite and they and
[113:21] like you you say some friends I'm like
[113:23] I've never heard of this thing. What is
[113:24] this thing? Okay. Even if even you talk
[113:26] to Jewish elite they're like never heard
[113:28] never heard he heard of this. Okay. But
[113:30] it's the air they breathe. It's the
[113:32] culture that they are in. Okay. All
[113:35] right. Um sorry you you your hand up.
[113:40] Yeah. Go ahead.
[113:45] >> So I guess I wanted to ask about the
[113:47] beginning of the lecture when you um
[113:51] talked about
[113:54] the occult and like having um a crazy
[113:58] experience, a supernatural experience.
[113:59] If you if you yourself had a
[114:01] supernatural experience and you had
[114:03] experienced u like nature behaving in a
[114:06] way that you've never seen before um or
[114:09] you know you had all this energy you
[114:10] couldn't sleep right like what would you
[114:13] do with that yourself? Would you join in
[114:16] a cult as we know them now? Like with
[114:19] all the things that they do, with all
[114:21] the things um horrible that are
[114:24] happening and and that may be or would
[114:27] you join like would you make your own?
[114:29] Is that like why you've decided to start
[114:32] lecturing yourself and trying to um
[114:35] promote you know your kind of ideas with
[114:39] this in your thought process? Um what
[114:42] what would what would you do yourself?
[114:44] >> Me. Yes.
[114:45] >> Okay. Could you rephrase your question
[114:47] in a similar way?
[114:49] >> If you had a supernatural experience and
[114:53] maybe you had multiple maybe you maybe
[114:56] you've like had these experiences and
[114:59] you want to do something about it. You
[115:02] want to tell people about it, but you
[115:04] can't, right? Cuz you said that there's
[115:07] people that might lock you up. there's
[115:09] people that might um stop you from
[115:12] really learning the truth about or or
[115:15] trying to tell people about your
[115:18] experience. Um what would you do then
[115:22] with with all of that said? Would you
[115:26] join a secret society because they were
[115:28] created from those people having those
[115:31] experiences because they, you know, had
[115:34] to find a way to use that? They wanted
[115:36] to keep learning about their experience
[115:38] and maybe they keep having experiences
[115:40] so they need to do something about it
[115:42] and do it somewhere.
[115:43] >> Would you would you make your own secret
[115:46] society yourself because you can't trust
[115:49] the ones around you now because they've
[115:51] been infected with 17 frankism or would
[115:54] you would you what would you do?
[115:58] >> Okay. Yeah. Okay. All right. All right.
[116:02] So, let me explain.
[116:05] Okay. All right. So, first of all, let
[116:09] let me explain how I got here. Okay. All
[116:12] right. So, for most of my my life, of
[116:14] course, I was a nobody. And um but I
[116:18] would have visions
[116:20] and
[116:22] for for example, I knew Putin would
[116:25] invade Ukraine
[116:28] and I knew that Trump would get a third
[116:32] term. sorry, get get a would get a sec
[116:35] second term. I have all these visions.
[116:36] Okay. And I don't know why I had these
[116:40] visions. Um and eventually I had a
[116:44] family and I like well you know maybe if
[116:47] I were to go on YouTube and I I got
[116:49] famous then um I could support my family
[116:54] better. Okay. Because at that time I had
[116:55] two kids and I I was working as a high
[116:57] school teacher. I was not making that
[116:58] much money, right? So I wanted some
[117:00] supplementary income and I thought
[117:02] thought that if I got famous on YouTube
[117:04] that that would help. Okay, that was
[117:05] just a plan.
[117:06] But then when it actually happened I'm
[117:08] like oh this is kind of strange. Okay so
[117:11] you understand like having a plan is
[117:13] different from actually it happening in
[117:14] reality. All right. So now I have a
[117:16] problem which is like um there are
[117:19] certain people in the world who think I
[117:20] have prophetic powers and um I now have
[117:24] this issue where if I prove that I have
[117:27] pro prophetic powers then I could get
[117:29] get kidnapped by the government and be
[117:31] experimented on. I could get co-opted by
[117:34] secret societies. Okay. There lot there
[117:35] are lot lots of things. Okay. Um so my
[117:39] first problem is like how do I actually
[117:42] protect myself? And the my solution was
[117:45] I'm not going to monetize my YouTube,
[117:47] okay? I won't monetize my YouTube. And
[117:51] we're talking like millions of dollars,
[117:52] guys. Okay? Like if you actually go my
[117:55] YouTube channel, I almost have 3 million
[117:56] subscribers. A lot of my videos got
[117:58] millions of views. And these are goes on
[117:59] for like an hour or two hours. If you
[118:01] actually do the math, I'm pro I'm
[118:03] probably like
[118:05] like just not taking $2 million. Okay.
[118:08] Two to four. Who who knows? Okay. But
[118:10] I'm leaving millions of dollars on the
[118:11] table. Okay. Why am I doing that? Okay,
[118:14] the reason why is like I don't want to
[118:17] be co-opted by the government or or or
[118:19] the elite or secret societies. So, so
[118:21] let let me tell you a story where a few
[118:24] months ago I was approached by the
[118:25] largest publisher in the world. I I
[118:27] won't I won't say the name, okay? But
[118:29] it's basically the largest publisher in
[118:30] the world. Um and it's very prestigious
[118:32] and they they were like, you know, well,
[118:35] we want to give you a book contract,
[118:36] $150,000 advance for a first book, which
[118:38] is a lot of money. Okay. And like the
[118:40] issue is when you sign with the largest
[118:43] publisher in the world, it's about you
[118:46] you're now part of the club, right?
[118:48] Because now you'll be invited on all the
[118:50] all the major news networks. You'll be
[118:52] invited to all the all the parties.
[118:53] You'll be invited to go speak at
[118:55] universities, Yale, Harvard, you know,
[118:57] it it's something that I would have
[118:58] really wanted um um if I were in my 20s
[119:02] or 30s. But now that I'm like 50 years
[119:04] old, I'm like, you know what? If I take
[119:06] this book deal, I'll probably end up
[119:09] getting a stick stuck on my ass. Okay.
[119:12] Because like
[119:14] I'm not joking actually. Um
[119:17] >> yeah. Yeah. I was like, do I really want
[119:19] to go this path, right, where yeah, you
[119:21] are now allowed into the club, but uh
[119:25] what happened was
[119:27] um they they they offer me this contract
[119:29] and I said yes. Lynon's like, "Okay, um,
[119:32] we we need you to make a video
[119:35] reenouncing certain things you said
[119:36] online."
[119:38] And I said, "I'm not going to do that,
[119:39] guys." Cuz like I I know this ends up
[119:41] with with a dick up my ass. Okay. But
[119:43] like like that like that that's how this
[119:45] world works, you know? You have to prove
[119:46] you're part of the club and you have to
[119:48] go through certain initiation
[119:51] um steps. And I like fine to show these
[119:54] secretities I can't be bought. I just
[119:56] will not monetize my YouTube channel.
[119:58] Okay. and that this is the best way to
[120:01] protect myself. But then this leads to
[120:04] another problem which is like okay then
[120:05] how do I go about ensuring I'm able to
[120:10] have these visions
[120:12] and what I discovered is these visions
[120:16] come from a good heart.
[120:20] I'm been given these visions because my
[120:23] desire is to share the truth with the
[120:26] world.
[120:27] Okay, you understand? All right. How do
[120:30] I ensure I continue these visions? By
[120:34] sharing the truth with the world for
[120:36] free in as many different places as
[120:38] possible by educating the public. I'm
[120:41] pretty sure if I decided like, you know
[120:43] what, I'll start my own private
[120:46] consultancy and I will only share my
[120:49] visions with the richest people in the
[120:52] world. I'll probably make a lot of money
[120:53] doing it, but I'll probably also not
[120:56] have these visions anymore. Okay? I'll
[120:58] probably start losing this access to the
[121:02] truth and start just doing what they
[121:04] tell me to do, which is spread
[121:05] propaganda.
[121:06] All right? So, um, so the second thing
[121:10] is I continue to speak out in public
[121:13] places to you guys and share the truth.
[121:18] Also what I what what what what I I what
[121:20] what I do is when I do meetups I
[121:23] actually don't have a script in mind. I
[121:26] have a broad framework but I but I see
[121:29] uh these meetups these lectures as
[121:32] co-creation
[121:34] right so uh we're we are opening a
[121:37] portal together your curiosity plus my
[121:41] uh intuition we're opening a portal
[121:42] together into truth so we are accessing
[121:44] truth together okay so this is my
[121:48] strategy for maintaining
[121:52] my um access to the truth and and for
[121:55] protecting myself, I'm not going to
[121:57] monetize, which tells your lead that I
[121:59] cannot be bought. And quite honestly,
[122:00] the only way that they can actually
[122:01] control you is through money, right? The
[122:04] mo the moment you decide that money is
[122:06] what I want, they have you. Okay? But
[122:09] the moment that but like but when you're
[122:11] like, you know, I don't want the money,
[122:12] take your $2 million and like shove it
[122:14] up your ass. They can't do anything
[122:16] about you. Okay? Okay. Does that make
[122:19] sense? And in order to maintain my
[122:22] creativity, what I'm doing is I'm going
[122:24] around the world. I'm learning more
[122:26] about the world, but I'm also um drawing
[122:29] inspiration from the people I I meet.
[122:32] Okay. The last thing which is most
[122:34] important is I'm keeping focus on my
[122:36] family. Okay. I my regardless regardless
[122:39] of how famous I get, I'm always like
[122:41] what matters is ensuring my children are
[122:44] safe and happy and healthy and that's my
[122:47] priority. Okay. and and so that's my
[122:49] strategy moving forward.
[122:52] >> Yeah.
[122:53] >> I guess I I want to ask a follow up on
[122:56] that. What if your what your experiences
[122:59] are because maybe you're your in
[123:03] yourself? Where's what if the experience
[123:06] isn't isn't exactly yours? What if it's
[123:09] still supernatural? You can't explain
[123:12] where it comes from, but it's not it's
[123:16] not exactly yours.
[123:18] yourself,
[123:19] >> right? Okay. So, the question is, what
[123:21] if I'm being possessed, right, by by by
[123:24] a higher force? What if what if I'm just
[123:26] channeling, right?
[123:27] >> Okay. Yeah.
[123:28] >> Well, nothing changes, right? Because
[123:30] this this force has found me because I'm
[123:33] a certain person because I I'm I'm
[123:37] living a certain life, right? And so
[123:38] this force thinks that I'm the perfect
[123:40] vehicle in order to spread a certain
[123:44] message that this force wants, right? in
[123:47] which case I need to
[123:51] maintain what I'm doing in order to
[123:54] sustain this force.
[123:57] Do you understand?
[123:59] Okay. But and you know like sometimes I
[124:02] think that I am protected by angels.
[124:04] Okay. Like I I feel as though I don't
[124:09] really have have to fear anything or
[124:10] anyone. I I I just I just speak the
[124:13] truth. Okay. And what's driving it? It
[124:16] is just I feel I'm I'm being protected
[124:18] by a higher force.
[124:21] Um and I shouldn't have to fear anything
[124:24] or or anyone. I could be wrong. Okay.
[124:27] But that that's what I believe.
[124:29] Okay. All right. Uh um yeah, we'll we'll
[124:33] we'll go.
[124:35] >> Thank you, professor. Um, I'm actually
[124:38] uh this is going to be like a hypo
[124:40] hypothetical question just
[124:42] >> uh but it's also going to be I think the
[124:44] previous person was trying to say I'm
[124:47] not sure if she was trying to say this
[124:48] but
[124:49] >> do you think it's possible
[124:51] hypothetically
[124:53] to let's say if you have a spark of
[124:56] light or a great imagination do you
[124:59] think it's possible to learn the cabala
[125:02] practice a cabala uh again
[125:04] hypothetically to create your own cult,
[125:07] your own society. But instead of people
[125:10] who you know that want power basically
[125:13] would be to uh
[125:16] stop the other cults, all cults, all
[125:18] societ all the secret societies and um
[125:23] destroy their system of money basically
[125:25] which is what controls and makes a bunch
[125:27] of current NPCs today.
[125:29] >> Okay. Yeah.
[125:32] Okay. I I'm sure a lot of you have this
[125:34] question. Um, and I don't think my role
[125:39] is to counter or destroy
[125:43] this nefarious system that they have.
[125:47] Um,
[125:49] and you know, it's something that I
[125:50] think think about a lot. Um, but what I
[125:55] believe is what I do really well is
[125:58] education.
[125:59] Um what I what I do really well is
[126:02] research,
[126:04] inquiry and uh communication. So I I
[126:09] don't know what these forces are. Okay.
[126:12] Um but if you are to counter
[126:16] these the the elite, okay, taking them
[126:19] on directly does no does you no good
[126:22] because their superpower is of sin,
[126:24] right? So to beat them, you have to
[126:27] engage in sin as well. which case you
[126:29] become controlled by these spiritual
[126:31] forces. It's like Star Wars, right? The
[126:34] the the light side, the dark side,
[126:36] right? So, the only way that you can
[126:38] actually defeat uh the elite is by
[126:42] summoning more different spiritual
[126:45] forces,
[126:46] right? And these spiritual forces are
[126:50] summoned through not sin but through
[126:52] love,
[126:54] openness, generosity, creativity,
[126:56] imagination.
[126:57] All right? So then question then is in a
[127:01] world controlled by the elite
[127:05] and who impose their values on us then
[127:10] how how's it possible to create new
[127:14] societies based on love on openness and
[127:18] on generosity
[127:20] and um my solution is you have to do it
[127:23] through children.
[127:25] Okay. Um, and what I mean by that is I
[127:30] have three kids and
[127:33] um, I think they all come from a
[127:36] different world. Like maybe their bodies
[127:38] come from this world, but their
[127:40] consciousness comes from a different
[127:42] world. And if we are truly to save the
[127:46] world, we first have to save the
[127:48] children. Okay? And so I think um the
[127:53] society that we've constructed um the
[127:56] most the thing that makes me the most
[127:58] angry is how anti-child it is, right?
[128:02] Because kids are meant to explore
[128:04] nature. They're meant to um um be
[128:09] curious, but like we sit in the school
[128:12] where they're asked to sit sit for like
[128:14] sit sit still for like 8 hours a day and
[128:17] where if you don't sit still for 8 hours
[128:18] a day, they drug you and they think this
[128:21] is all for your own good. Like like it's
[128:23] all insane, right? So um I think that
[128:27] the path forward is to focus on families
[128:31] bringing bringing families together and
[128:33] creating creating alternative ecosystems
[128:36] um in order to preserve the innocence
[128:39] the imagination of children that I think
[128:42] is the best solution moving forward.
[128:45] Okay. Does that make sense?
[128:47] >> Okay. Um uh yes here you go.
[128:52] Thank you. Uh, I understood what you
[128:55] were saying about the Sabatine Frankus.
[128:58] >> Yeah.
[128:58] >> Um, but I'm wondering how the elites
[129:01] kind of obsession with AI and bringing
[129:04] about AGI
[129:05] >> Yeah.
[129:05] >> might come together with Sabatine and
[129:08] Frankism and whether they think AGI
[129:11] could be God.
[129:13] >> Yeah.
[129:14] >> Okay. That's a great question. Okay. All
[129:16] right. So, remember Franklin infiltrated
[129:20] all the organizations. Okay. including
[129:22] the Freemasons. All right? And the
[129:24] Freemasons are the people who created
[129:26] the United States of America.
[129:29] And so the Cabala entered the
[129:32] Freemasons,
[129:33] but it became warped through uh
[129:37] Freemasonry. Okay. So, uh the main ideas
[129:40] of Freemasonry is
[129:43] um there is a god, but he's indifferent.
[129:47] Okay? It's called the the religion is
[129:49] called theism. there is a god and he he
[129:53] created us in order to perfect the
[129:56] world. Okay. So per perfection is
[129:58] possible but that's it has to be done
[130:00] through mathematics through geometry
[130:05] through reason. Okay. They call it
[130:06] reason
[130:08] and so what they want to do is what
[130:11] exactly what the Jews do which is create
[130:14] a holy temple of reason so that God can
[130:17] come and live amongst us. Right? So and
[130:20] and how do you do that? Well, you have
[130:22] to change the fundamental nature of
[130:24] humans. Humans are too loud, too
[130:30] opinionated, too stubborn. Okay? You
[130:33] have to through education, through the
[130:37] media, through culture change human
[130:39] beings into a perfect cube of reason.
[130:45] Okay? So that means removing prejudice,
[130:48] that means em removing emotion. That
[130:51] means removing tradition, family, okay,
[130:55] prejudice, anything that gets in the way
[130:57] of reason, you have to get rid of. Once
[130:59] that happens,
[131:01] then everyone will be a perfect cube.
[131:03] When once once it's a perfect cube, then
[131:05] you're going to assemble everyone
[131:06] together and create a perfect temple of
[131:08] reason that allows God to live amongst
[131:10] us. Okay?
[131:12] And so the Freemasons have struggled for
[131:14] centuries of how to do this. And um
[131:19] there different solutions historically.
[131:22] Um one solution was the meritocracy,
[131:26] right? Education. Why do you go to
[131:28] school? Why do you learn mathematics? To
[131:31] become a perfect cube of reason, right?
[131:37] And it's worked out really well because
[131:41] I I went to Yale. I mean, you go to Yale
[131:43] in Harvard, McGill is here. These kids
[131:46] think all alike, man. They're very
[131:47] they're not very imaginative. They're
[131:49] very, you know, they're they think like
[131:51] computers,
[131:53] right? The problem though is that's only
[131:56] a minority of people. How do you get
[131:58] everyone to think like these guys like
[132:01] which is like a which is a thing like a
[132:03] computer? And the answer is by having
[132:06] everyone be a computer. And how do you
[132:08] do that? Through AI. Right? So let's
[132:11] imagine
[132:13] what do you do? It's being monitored by
[132:15] AI. Right?
[132:17] Why is it that these AI assistants are
[132:20] being like, you know, pushed on our
[132:22] throats? They're not any good. Like
[132:24] Siri, right? Like before you would be at
[132:28] home and you would like have an idea and
[132:30] you go online and like be like, "Oh,
[132:32] okay. um do some googling right now. You
[132:35] just ask Siri or Chhat BT.
[132:40] Why? Because they're trying to get you
[132:41] to think in a certain way, right? And
[132:44] then eventually what they want is to
[132:47] implant a microchip in you, Neurolink.
[132:49] And so all your thoughts are being
[132:51] monitored and being controlled by the
[132:53] AI. That's good because then everyone
[132:56] will be reasonable, right? No more
[132:59] emotions, no more prejudice, no more
[133:01] hatred, just pure love. And that's what
[133:05] AI is.
[133:07] Okay. Does that make sense?
[133:08] >> But as far as the AGI goes, do do you
[133:11] think some of them think AGI is going to
[133:14] become God? Like there's a theory that
[133:16] they're trying to bring about God
[133:18] through AI and that the super
[133:21] intelligence is going to be
[133:23] >> okay.
[133:24] >> God, okay, essentially.
[133:25] >> All right. There are things they tell us
[133:27] and there are things that they actually
[133:28] believe. Okay? No one
[133:31] there's no way a computer science
[133:33] believes that uh you can create god
[133:36] through through computers. Okay. But
[133:39] it's possible to make every human into a
[133:42] computer.
[133:43] Doesn't make sense. Which case the AI
[133:45] now is now god because now the AI is
[133:48] able to direct everything.
[133:50] Doesn't make sense.
[133:52] >> Okay. That's what they want. They they
[133:54] want to create a surveillance state in
[133:57] which everyone is monitored in which
[133:59] case you have an now an AI AI god.
[134:02] That's a real goal.
[134:03] >> That's true.
[134:03] >> Okay. Um well okay you have a question.
[134:07] Okay. All right.
[134:10] So um this is might be a question that
[134:13] is more with uh your other meet up at
[134:16] Toronto but um of all the things you've
[134:20] discussed in this lecture could it have
[134:22] anything to do with like the Canada US
[134:25] trade war going on currently
[134:27] in
[134:30] >> um okay so the US Canada trade war is
[134:34] not a trade war what it really is is a
[134:38] war between two empires s okay you have
[134:41] the US empire and you have the British
[134:43] Empire the Canada is a colony of the
[134:46] British Empire but Donald Trump believes
[134:48] that um all of western hemisphere should
[134:52] belongs to America okay so that's that's
[134:54] what it is it's it's a war over
[134:56] sovereignty is Canada obedient to the UK
[134:59] or is Canada obedient to United States
[135:02] and that's why
[135:04] um there can be no possible resolution
[135:06] to this trade war the real thing you
[135:10] need to watch is Mark Carney. Okay, Mark
[135:12] Carney, he is assembling in himself a
[135:16] dict the the power of of a dictator.
[135:20] Okay, I mean like the guy's a dictator.
[135:22] I mean, he's much worse than Trump with
[135:25] at least Trump had to get votes in order
[135:28] to become president of United States.
[135:30] Mark Carney cheated his way into the the
[135:34] prime ministership. Okay, you look you
[135:37] look at the liberal election, everyone
[135:40] dropped out and gave it to Carney. And
[135:42] then during the general election, Pier
[135:44] Par basically self-destructed and gave
[135:46] him the the um the leadership. When he
[135:49] became prime minister, he start to bribe
[135:52] conservative members to join his caucus.
[135:56] This this is this is all actions of a
[135:58] dictator. If you look at um the
[136:01] reporting from the Toronto Star, they're
[136:03] saying how all these ministers
[136:06] um in his cabinet, they're being
[136:07] sidelined and he's got this core group
[136:09] basically executive
[136:12] um like like doing all all all the
[136:14] decisions. Okay. Everything that's
[136:16] happening is Mark Carney is assembling
[136:18] the powers of of the dictator in order
[136:21] to serve the interests of the British of
[136:24] the city of London basically. Okay. Uh
[136:26] yeah, sorry you already asked, but um
[136:28] yeah.
[136:30] M
[136:34] >> so um you talked about um let's say sin
[136:38] and how how they have to do sin to bring
[136:41] God uh to back to earth but wouldn't it
[136:46] make more sense that there is cuz you
[136:47] were saying there's evil there's child
[136:49] sacrifice and wouldn't it make more
[136:52] sense that there is a force behind this
[136:54] evil that is in contrast to let's say
[136:58] God that is all loving and kind that he
[137:00] wants the best for us. So, shouldn't
[137:03] there be like these secret societies?
[137:05] Why are they secret and why are they
[137:06] performing sin? Isn't it to maybe
[137:09] further the agenda of something some
[137:12] evil force like and if you read like the
[137:15] book of Revelation, a lot of what it's
[137:17] talked about uh like you can't buy or
[137:20] sell without this mark on your your hand
[137:23] or your forehead. and all of these uh
[137:26] agencies, the secret societies, UN,
[137:28] they're all pointing towards a one world
[137:31] government, one world religion, um maybe
[137:34] one world god like he was talking about
[137:35] with the AI that's going to come and
[137:38] we're going to have to worship this god
[137:40] and take the mark or else uh we can't
[137:42] buy or sell and and uh we're dead. So
[137:45] where do you bring in the an evil force
[137:47] into your talk like a like the great
[137:49] Satan or something like that
[137:50] >> with child sacrifice ball molec um all
[137:54] these people?
[137:55] >> Okay.
[137:57] >> Yeah, that's a great question. Okay. All
[138:00] right. So um
[138:04] another way of asking this question is
[138:07] do you think do do I think Satan exists
[138:09] and do do the elite worship Satan? Okay.
[138:13] Um, here's here's what I think. I don't
[138:16] think the elite are worshiping Satan. I
[138:20] think the elite have much more
[138:21] complicated, much more nuanced
[138:23] understanding of their role in society.
[138:26] Okay? And I've I've just explained it to
[138:28] you, okay? How the elite think. And but
[138:32] you know, it's hard for people to
[138:35] actually appreciate the nuance of what's
[138:37] going on. It's hard for an person to
[138:40] think like a billionaire. Okay. So,
[138:44] um most people will just use the idea of
[138:46] Lucifer or Satan to explain what's going
[138:49] on. And there is some um accuracy or
[138:54] usefulness to to using Lucifer and
[138:57] Satan. Okay? And so, you know, I teach
[139:00] predictive history. And so, I'm trying
[139:02] to teach people how to think in a way
[139:04] that allows them to understand the world
[139:05] and make predictions about the world.
[139:08] And if you just assume the elite are
[139:12] saying in this and they are trying to
[139:14] bring bring out a one one world
[139:16] government
[139:17] it's I mean it helps helps you explain
[139:20] understand the world helps you predict
[139:22] what's going on. Okay. And it's actually
[139:25] no different from what what what I just
[139:26] said. Okay. I mean like um I'm just
[139:30] trying to use a more scholarly much more
[139:34] nuanced explanation for what's going on
[139:36] to make better predictions. All right.
[139:39] But you can generalize and says well
[139:40] they're just saying in this who practice
[139:42] child sacrifice. Okay. So does that make
[139:45] sense?
[139:46] >> Okay. So so I so so I mean there's
[139:48] nothing wrong with this idea. It's just
[139:50] like not actually how they think because
[139:52] like no one actually thinks like I
[139:53] worship Satan
[139:55] >> but there's a church of Satan. There's
[139:56] Luciferians. There's, you know, there's
[139:59] these or
[140:00] >> Yeah, these these people are insane.
[140:01] They're actually not part of the elite.
[140:03] Okay. Right. There are churches of
[140:04] Satan, but like is that is that a real
[140:06] thing or is it a troll? Right. I mean,
[140:08] is it a um you know, because like um
[140:13] like if I'm the lead, I need to s solve
[140:15] certain problems. For example, I need
[140:18] access to bodies and fresh women, right?
[140:22] Well, now I I need to create
[140:23] organizations in order to achieve these
[140:26] certain goals. So, for example, in
[140:27] Britain, there's this all the scandal,
[140:29] the Pakistani grooming gangs, right?
[140:31] Well, why do they exist? And and who are
[140:33] they working for? Well, they're probably
[140:34] they're probably working working for the
[140:36] elite.
[140:37] Okay. Um, so remember guys, I I I I know
[140:40] this is hard for you to appreciate, but
[140:44] like according to fragism, they can do
[140:48] this to people because
[140:51] most people are not real human beings.
[140:53] Okay. Does that make sense? What do you
[140:55] mean most people aren't human?
[140:57] >> The sparks of light.
[140:58] >> Yeah.
[140:59] >> Do you understand? The sparks of light.
[141:01] That That's what matters. You're only
[141:02] human if a spark of light is in you,
[141:05] right?
[141:07] >> If you're not a spark of light, who
[141:08] cares what what I do? What I do to you?
[141:10] You're just a husk. You're just a body.
[141:12] You're you're just an animal.
[141:16] Okay.
[141:19] Um, sorry. Back there.
[141:23] Here you go. All right. Yeah. Cool.
[141:27] >> Uh thank you professor. Uh so I had a
[141:29] quick question. Uh you mentioned uh the
[141:31] kids. Um as just as you I'm very worried
[141:35] about the kids. So how do you how do we
[141:37] go about uh educating them? How do we go
[141:39] about raising those kids in in such a
[141:41] society? Thank you.
[141:46] >> Yeah. I mean, look, I mean, I hate to
[141:49] say this, but like if you really want to
[141:51] survive what's going on, you have to
[141:52] learn non-compliance.
[141:55] That's the only way, okay? If you just
[141:56] do what the government tells you to do,
[141:58] what people expect you to do, you'll get
[142:00] screwed over. All right? So, don't send
[142:04] your kids to school
[142:06] because that's the that's the way they
[142:08] often enforce compliance, right?
[142:11] And
[142:13] um if you send your kids to school, then
[142:15] it's easy for them to enforce enforce
[142:18] vaccine mandate. It's it's easy for for
[142:20] them to monitor your thoughts. It's easy
[142:22] for for them to brainwash your kid and
[142:25] um get them to um I mean they can turn
[142:29] your kid your kid against you. Um and
[142:32] this happens a lot, right?
[142:36] And like
[142:38] I had to say this, okay, but the
[142:40] bureaucracy, the police, the the the
[142:41] school system, it's not set up to deal
[142:44] with non-compliant people. It's to deal
[142:46] with compliant people.
[142:48] All right? If you look at um child abuse
[142:52] cases, the workload
[142:55] are not often extreme cases where
[142:58] there's real child abuse. The workload
[143:01] is often some minor child abuse. Does
[143:04] that make sense? Why? Because these
[143:06] bureaucrats are interested in
[143:07] compliance. Okay? If I'm a bureaucrat
[143:10] and I'm supposed to deal with child
[143:11] abuse, oh, sorry.
[143:15] Um, then it's easier for me to deal with
[143:18] soft cases, okay? Where there might be
[143:21] some disagreements like in the
[143:23] household. I don't want to deal with
[143:25] like real child abuse where, you know,
[143:27] the father's alcoholic and, you know,
[143:29] and all that because like that's just
[143:31] painful. Like, okay. Okay, so the
[143:33] bureaucracy is set up to deal with
[143:35] compliance. So the more compliant you
[143:37] are, the more the more you'll be bullied
[143:38] by the system, right? So just keep that
[143:40] in mind. Um, and if you have children,
[143:42] then I would suggest not sending your
[143:44] children to school like like I'm home
[143:47] I'm homeschooling all my kids because
[143:49] school is the main vector by which they
[143:52] force compliance on onto people.
[143:55] >> Uh, yeah.
[143:56] >> Just to know since you're not sending
[143:58] them to school. So how what do you teach
[144:00] them? cuz I know you love them because
[144:04] what do you teach them?
[144:05] >> I don't teach him anything
[144:06] >> apart from the great
[144:07] >> I don't teach them anything.
[144:08] >> I mean like like my son is back there
[144:13] watching his iPad and you know we we we
[144:16] spent some time with our family in the
[144:18] woods like they were and they were just
[144:20] running around like like what what what
[144:22] you need to appreciate is that kids are
[144:26] learning machines.
[144:27] They absorb and learn wherever they are,
[144:30] what do they do? But they need freedom
[144:33] to do so. Okay? And no matter how well
[144:36] you construct the curriculum, it's still
[144:39] not enough for them. Okay? Like
[144:44] honestly, the Canadian curriculum, any
[144:46] curriculum, I work in education. I know
[144:48] this. It's a complete waste of time.
[144:51] like like like for kids to learn how to
[144:53] read, you're like, "Okay, like I need to
[144:55] teach them like these letters and then I
[144:57] need to teach them like to how how to
[144:58] string those words."
[145:00] What kids have are like these uh very
[145:03] powerful pattern recognition brains. So
[145:06] if like they just like look at a book
[145:08] and just read by themselves, they will
[145:11] learn how to read by themselves. The
[145:13] problem is like how do you get them to
[145:15] like sit quietly,
[145:18] focus, concentrate and want to learn,
[145:21] right? And and the way you do that is by
[145:24] giving them autonomy, by giving them
[145:26] love, by supporting them. Okay? And the
[145:31] way you destroy that is through
[145:33] schooling, through tests, through too
[145:35] much screen time, through too much um
[145:38] compliance.
[145:41] All right? It's a school's the worst
[145:42] thing you can do for your for your kids.
[145:46] I mean, yeah.
[145:49] >> No, you can finish your point.
[145:50] >> No, no, I'm I'm finished. Okay. All
[145:52] right. Um uh who who's who's next? Yeah,
[145:55] go ahead.
[145:59] So you had mentioned near the end of
[146:00] your lecture that uh the Epstein class
[146:03] going to the island
[146:06] went there to try to find love by
[146:08] brainwashing or teaching these young
[146:11] women 14 to 17 year olds to to do so to
[146:15] love them. But would would it not make
[146:18] more sense for them to try to find
[146:20] like-minded billionaires or people who
[146:23] women or men or whatever to love each
[146:26] other and then raise their wealth and do
[146:30] so together?
[146:31] >> Yeah, but then who's who's in control?
[146:34] >> Who's the boss?
[146:39] >> Okay, good point. I mean, they could
[146:41] both be the boss. I mean, they could
[146:42] >> That's not how it works, man.
[146:45] They're going to be one.
[146:48] Well,
[146:51] what if uh I mean in that case, wouldn't
[146:53] they have the risk of the Epstein files,
[146:55] for example, coming out and then
[146:56] everyone being against them and they
[146:58] they wouldn't be able to push their
[147:00] agenda for
[147:01] >> they control the world?
[147:04] >> Well, okay. I mean, if if 90% of the
[147:07] world is against them and they don't
[147:08] have the public opinion with them, like
[147:11] s such as the prime minister of Israel
[147:13] trying to
[147:15] buy Tik Tok or have the United States
[147:18] buy Tik Tok to force the younger
[147:20] generation to, you know, try to have
[147:23] like-minded ideas
[147:26] like most people don't matter. 9% of
[147:29] people, 99% of people, you're not
[147:31] supposed to light. It doesn't matter.
[147:32] Would wouldn't it make it more difficult
[147:34] for Israel and
[147:37] uh them to push their agenda if they
[147:40] don't have the public opinion uh uh with
[147:44] them as well though?
[147:50] Sorry. Sorry.
[147:54] >> Okay. I mean I mean I I I hate to say
[147:56] this but like the reality is like most
[147:58] people don't really matter. Democracy is
[148:00] just a myth they created in order to
[148:02] justify the Bank of England. Okay, I I
[148:04] I've explained this, right? In a
[148:07] parliamentary system where the
[148:08] parliament guarantees the national debt,
[148:12] then you need to fool people into
[148:14] accepting the system. You fool people by
[148:17] preaching private property and
[148:18] democracy. And what people don't
[148:20] recognize is these these these two
[148:23] things are in contradiction with each
[148:24] other. Okay? Right? in a closet between
[148:27] private property and democracy. Who
[148:29] wins?
[148:32] >> I every single time try it, man. Like
[148:36] the entire population of Canada votes
[148:39] 100% like like let's let's you know
[148:41] divide up up the property equally. Let's
[148:45] let's let's reduce um inequality, right?
[148:49] What happens? The Supreme Court says you
[148:52] can't do that. That's unconstitutional.
[148:55] Too bad there's no democracy, right?
[148:59] In a democracy, the people can say we
[149:02] the people want this. But guess what?
[149:06] The law says you can't do that because
[149:09] private property is what matters.
[149:12] Okay? And people don't appreciate this.
[149:16] there there are all these contradictions
[149:18] throughout society and people don't
[149:21] understand these are contradictions and
[149:24] that's why the fans say people don't
[149:26] matter who cares
[149:30] okay um so sorry let's back there
[149:40] sorry I wanted to let this one go but
[149:42] since we came back it's similar to I
[149:44] think his question. It's It's still hard
[149:47] to believe that. I mean, I get the Frank
[149:49] Sebastian ideology of, you know, most
[149:53] people don't matter because of that
[149:54] spark. They don't have it. And then yet
[149:56] they do all the sins. Like, if you
[149:58] really want to collect the spark, like
[150:00] do something good, why do you have to go
[150:02] have, you know, gang rangs and all that
[150:05] parties and stuff? So it begs it still
[150:08] begs this question in my head that is
[150:11] there and I think you do you did mention
[150:13] if I'm not mistaken that there you do
[150:15] believe that there is another
[150:17] dimensional kind of or other dimensional
[150:19] beings and perhaps how some of the
[150:23] energies that you you feel or or is is
[150:26] the good what I at least when I
[150:27] interpret that or when I feel that it's
[150:29] a good part of that or a good piece of
[150:31] that and then there is so again I'm
[150:33] going back to like it's hard not to like
[150:36] feel that there is that other negative
[150:39] or evil whatever I don't want to call it
[150:41] a Satan or maybe these other dimensional
[150:43] beings. I don't know if you've um I
[150:46] don't know I think uh David Monroe maybe
[150:48] calls it luchu they're out there to get
[150:50] lu from people or like this this
[150:52] negative
[150:54] does doesn't your mind take you there
[150:55] like isn't there something there's got
[150:57] to be something me more messed up than
[150:59] just hey we became billionaires and then
[151:02] we lost our you know we're explaining it
[151:04] this way.
[151:05] >> Yeah.
[151:08] Oops. Sorry. Because you may have all
[151:10] that to spark.
[151:12] >> Yeah. Okay. All right. So,
[151:16] um,
[151:18] what I think is this. There are infinite
[151:21] dimensions. We're just one dimension
[151:23] amongst infinite dimensions. There are
[151:25] clearly other beings, other conscious
[151:28] beings throughout the universe that's
[151:31] impacting the world that we live in. Um
[151:34] and clearly the elite are able to access
[151:39] the powers of these other forces.
[151:43] Okay. Um and
[151:47] um what we need to and what the elite
[151:50] have done is they've imposed a
[151:54] mitralistic
[151:56] science and education system on us so
[151:58] that most of us cannot access these
[152:01] other spiritual beings. Does that make
[152:02] sense? Okay, if you cannot access these
[152:05] spiritual beings, then you become a
[152:07] slave to the elite. That's what the
[152:09] meritocracy is. Okay, you go to Yale and
[152:12] Harvard and all that happens is you end
[152:13] up being a slave to the to the to to to
[152:15] the elite. I know cuz I went to Yale. I
[152:18] know I know what how how it works.
[152:21] That's why I turn away from from Yale.
[152:24] Okay. So, you're absolutely right in
[152:26] that there are spiritual beings. They're
[152:28] all around us. And what we need to do is
[152:31] teach our children to access these
[152:32] spiritual beings and that will give them
[152:36] enlightenment and and imagination. And
[152:40] um the problem with school system is it
[152:44] tries to cut access to these spiritual
[152:46] beings. Okay? It's almost like you go to
[152:48] school and you have a labbotomy. Like I
[152:50] literally think that that that's what's
[152:51] happening. They're performing an
[152:52] operation on you which labizes you and
[152:54] which disconnects you from the real
[152:56] spiritual world.
[152:59] Okay. Um, yeah. Did you do did you have
[153:02] a question?
[153:03] >> I just want to add on to this point.
[153:05] It's quite simple. In fact, by taking
[153:07] the kids away from their parents,
[153:09] they're severing the love connection
[153:11] between the child and the parent. And if
[153:13] I could just summarize everything I've
[153:15] heard uh so far in this lecture, which
[153:17] was phenomenal by the way, I think that
[153:21] the only solution for the masses is to
[153:26] find our own uh spark. And at the
[153:30] beginning we talked about you have a
[153:32] superpower, you have this anxiety, you
[153:36] need to like find a solution to that
[153:38] anxiety. But there's another solution
[153:39] which is to allow yourself to be a
[153:42] vessel for the beauty, for the love. And
[153:46] when you allow the love to fill inside
[153:48] of yourself, you become attractive to
[153:50] all those people around you. And the
[153:52] connections that we make as human beings
[153:55] with the person to the left of us and
[153:57] the person to the right of us at any
[153:59] given moment, at any given time, is the
[154:02] way that we can channel these beings or
[154:05] these extradimensional forces. And I
[154:08] think that the air that we breathe, the
[154:11] institutionalized
[154:13] world that we've raised our children
[154:15] into is a dark time. But we have the
[154:18] power as individuals to create that
[154:22] unity and allow those that energy to
[154:25] come into the world. That's my
[154:26] observation. Thank you very
[154:28] >> No, thank you. That was beautiful. Okay.
[154:30] Also, I will point out this. There are
[154:32] different spiritual beings in the
[154:34] universe and they are at war with each
[154:36] other. Okay. But there are certain rules
[154:39] to their warfare. And one really
[154:41] important rule is you cannot mess you
[154:45] you have to grant free will to people.
[154:47] It doesn't make sense. So in other
[154:49] words, if I choose to worship a angel,
[154:53] demons can't mess with me. Okay?
[154:58] Demons can only mess with me if I sign a
[155:00] contract with a demon and I break that
[155:02] contract. Does that make sense, guys?
[155:04] All right. So this is a choice that
[155:06] everyone makes. You can choose to sign a
[155:08] contract with a demon or you can or you
[155:10] can choose to be to um channel angels.
[155:13] You have that choice. It's all free
[155:15] will. You cannot ever be forced to sign
[155:18] a contract with with with Satan or the
[155:20] devil. Okay? And so it's always your
[155:24] choice. It's a spiritual war. You can
[155:27] choose to pursue power, fame, and money,
[155:30] which case you're stuck being seven
[155:32] Frankus. Or you can choose to live a
[155:35] life of love, openness, generosity,
[155:38] imagination, in which case you will
[155:41] channeling, you will channel these
[155:42] powerful angels that will help you in
[155:46] your life. It's always your choice. Um,
[155:49] yeah,
[155:52] I listen to your Dante uh book uh
[155:55] reading and this is the point. What
[155:58] we're saying back and forth is that we
[156:01] may be living in the time of shades
[156:03] where everyone around us is an NPC where
[156:06] like we don't they don't have the spark
[156:08] in them, right? But if we're go after
[156:12] our love, if we are take agency and and
[156:17] act in this world with love, that will
[156:20] draw us through this time.
[156:23] Maybe
[156:26] >> also I will point out this okay in the
[156:30] 17 Frankus
[156:32] um religion they're looking for the
[156:34] sparks of light right so if you prove
[156:36] you're a spark of light they won't mess
[156:38] with you understand proving that you can
[156:41] ask questions proving that you can be
[156:43] creative proving that you're willing to
[156:46] die for what you believe in is a spark
[156:48] of light okay
[156:51] um yeah sorry back back here.
[156:56] Sorry. Sorry. Yeah.
[157:01] Okay. I'm going to try to um verbalize
[157:04] cuz I don't we don't I don't know. This
[157:06] is not often verbalized. Oscar in my
[157:09] case. Um yeah, I was wondering if this
[157:13] was maybe keeping us in the object.
[157:18] Uh the object is like this reality.
[157:22] uh and thinking that way like cuz love
[157:24] can be like a concept from one or
[157:27] another and the I don't know the counter
[157:30] movement right now is um exactly that
[157:34] like leaving the object leaving this I
[157:39] don't know this way of like overthinking
[157:42] even though it wakes like it wakes every
[157:44] like a lot of stuffs
[157:47] um the counter movement right now is
[157:50] like to elevate
[157:51] I don't know if this conference like but
[157:53] I thought it was like coming to this I'm
[157:56] just keep going going to keep saying
[157:58] this um elevate your vibration elevate
[158:01] your consciousness to be like to not be
[158:05] affected by the object cuz I don't know
[158:08] how long you've been here in Montreal
[158:10] but Montreal is like under many planes
[158:14] right now helicopters
[158:17] fake mufflers making sound all over the
[158:21] city. Uh like fake holes in the city not
[158:25] being repaired. I don't know. I think
[158:26] Montreal is one of the like next one
[158:29] coming like to be part of
[158:34] agenda 2030.
[158:37] So, I don't know like elevating your
[158:40] consciousness like trying to be like cuz
[158:43] right now my problem is like to not be
[158:46] affected by this
[158:48] the most as possible cuz this they want
[158:51] to keep us like into the object like
[158:54] into this. So, how do you access like
[158:56] your kids? Yeah, you say about your
[158:58] kids.
[158:59] They're going to be like don't put it
[159:01] into school but you keep being affected
[159:04] by this and the chip is coming. I'm like
[159:07] I don't want to go back there but yeah
[159:09] like how do you going to keep your like
[159:11] your kids from the chip and from this?
[159:16] >> Yeah. Okay. So I I need you to use your
[159:18] really quick. Okay.
[159:22] >> Um is Stella around like how how much
[159:25] more time do we have in this room?
[159:27] >> Uh 7.
[159:27] >> It's 10 minutes to 9 to 5 right now.
[159:29] >> Okay. But but like but like she rented
[159:30] this room and I'm 7 p.m.
[159:33] >> Okay. Okay. Okay. All right. Okay. All
[159:34] right. So the question for us is how do
[159:38] you become a spark of light right
[159:40] because we are all sparks of light but
[159:42] will you choose whether or not to become
[159:43] a spark of light and if you read Dante
[159:46] he will say there are two things the
[159:48] will and the desire okay if you
[159:51] recognize in yourself that I matter and
[159:55] I have the power and the free will to
[159:57] live a life whatever I want. If you
[159:59] truly believe that then all solutions
[160:02] will come to you. Okay. The problem is,
[160:06] as you point out, we've been brainwashed
[160:08] to think that we don't matter, that
[160:10] we're not sparks of light, that whatever
[160:12] we do doesn't matter in the grand scheme
[160:14] of things. Okay. So, it's really about
[160:16] elevating, as you say, elevating your
[160:18] consciousness and reaching a point where
[160:21] you recognize that everything I do
[160:24] has a huge impact in the universe. And
[160:26] so, everything I do must matter. I must
[160:31] live a life of consequence, of
[160:34] consciousness,
[160:36] of beauty, of truth. Okay? Because what
[160:39] matters is my life. I I I shouldn't
[160:41] worry about everyone else. I should
[160:42] worry about my life. Um if I have a if I
[160:46] have a child, then I should live my love
[160:47] my child to the best of my ability and I
[160:50] shouldn't really worry about what other
[160:52] people think. Okay? Because you know,
[160:53] one way that they really get you is they
[160:56] separate you and your child at a very
[160:58] early age.
[161:00] Right? And what that does is it causes
[161:02] anxiety in a child for the rest of his
[161:04] life or her life. Right? It causes
[161:07] anxiety in you as well. Right? Think
[161:09] about how you know if your child isn't
[161:11] around how much anxiety you have. You're
[161:13] always wondering like you know is my
[161:14] child safe at school. Right? So it's
[161:16] always trying to create fear and anxiety
[161:18] in you. And what you need to do is
[161:21] change your mindset become a spark of
[161:24] light and try to focus on love. Okay.
[161:28] All right. Um, so sorry so sorry. There
[161:31] there are many who have not spoken.
[161:32] Okay. Back there.
[161:36] >> Okay.
[161:41] Um, I think a few people have kind of
[161:43] been dancing around like a similar thing
[161:45] with their questions. So I'm going to
[161:47] try and ask it maybe in a different way
[161:49] just to clarify it in my mind. But if
[161:52] you were talking about uh this idea that
[161:55] sin um allows you to gain power there be
[162:00] become an elite um because you don't
[162:03] care about the consequence of what you
[162:04] do in that way. Um and
[162:09] what in your uh metaphysical framework
[162:12] what is what does the good represent?
[162:16] Are is it what you were talking about
[162:18] with the monad? Is it just like divine
[162:21] like source? Is it one source of God? Is
[162:23] it um just in this infinite dimensions
[162:27] there's a a force for good and a force
[162:29] for evil? Um is there a counter to that
[162:34] strategy of
[162:36] uh just sinning because that puts you at
[162:40] an advantage of people who are not
[162:41] willing to sin? Or is there some in your
[162:44] personal view for yourself? Do you are
[162:47] you adherent to a higher force that you
[162:49] might call something like God or Jesus
[162:51] or the Monad?
[162:54] >> Okay.
[163:00] >> Okay. Um so first thing I I want to do
[163:02] is clarify the nature of sin. Okay. I'm
[163:05] not saying that these people choose to
[163:07] sin. I'm just saying that they're born
[163:09] in a certain way that allows them to sin
[163:11] easier than other people. Okay? They're
[163:13] psychopaths. They don't feel regret for
[163:15] their actions.
[163:17] Okay? So, it's like um um alcoholics.
[163:21] Why why are people certain people
[163:22] alcoholics? Well, most of us if we drink
[163:25] too much, we feel bad. We throw up,
[163:28] right? And the next day we get up and we
[163:31] um regret it. Alcoholics are different.
[163:33] Alcoholics, you know, the more they
[163:35] drink, the happier they are, the more
[163:36] energetic they are. Okay? So, um, same
[163:40] thing with sin where most of us if we
[163:42] sin, we feel bad about it. So, we we we
[163:45] end this guilt makes us anxious. We
[163:47] can't sleep at night. Whereas the
[163:49] powerful people, they don't they don't
[163:51] have this problem. Like when they sin,
[163:53] they don't really care. Okay. Now, there
[163:55] are certain ways to create this in
[163:57] people. And one mechanism that they lead
[164:00] uh use is called something called
[164:02] disassociation. Okay? So they basically
[164:04] traumatize your children. So the
[164:05] children don't actually actually feel
[164:06] anything. Okay? They're disassociated.
[164:08] So when they hurt other people, they
[164:09] don't really know. Okay? So there there
[164:11] wish to induce this in into children.
[164:14] Okay? And 17 practice actually practice
[164:16] this. Um they they practice ritual
[164:18] incest. So there are ways to traumatize
[164:20] children so as to make them uh better
[164:23] elite. Okay.
[164:25] Um but another way to understand what's
[164:28] going on is imagine a forest. Okay. And
[164:31] in this forest you have different
[164:32] animals. You have wolves, you have
[164:34] lions, you have rabbits, you have birds.
[164:37] And we need to appreciate that. Um
[164:42] they're all there for a very special for
[164:44] for purpose, right? We can be like, you
[164:47] know what, the wolves are mean, so let's
[164:50] kill all the wolves. Well, when you do
[164:52] when you do that, you just destroy the
[164:53] balance of the forest, right? And this
[164:56] creates all sorts of problems. And
[164:57] that's what I'm saying about human
[164:59] society as well, where we're all born
[165:01] for a purpose, for a reason. And we can
[165:04] be like, you know, the elite are evil,
[165:06] so we need to overthrow the elite. But I
[165:08] don't know where that gets you, right?
[165:11] So, what what why we're here is to
[165:14] elevate our consciousness, to learn
[165:16] things about ourselves that we couldn't
[165:19] anywhere else, okay? to live the lives
[165:21] to to the best of our ability. No one
[165:24] can stop you from doing that. Okay? The
[165:26] elite are not preventing you from living
[165:30] a happy life. You're the one preventing
[165:33] yourself from living a happy life. Okay?
[165:36] So, I would say stop thinking about the
[165:39] elite cuz like they'll always be who
[165:41] they are. They will always be wolves.
[165:44] They will always commit sin. and focus
[165:46] on yourself and say how can I be a be a
[165:50] much more open generous
[165:53] and kind person to the people around me
[165:56] and once you do that then the universe
[165:58] changes
[166:00] okay
[166:03] um sorry there's a lot yeah go ahead
[166:06] >> thank you
[166:08] >> um so my question
[166:10] uh is about predictions um kind of so uh
[166:14] as you mentioned You think that we are
[166:16] back to family and it remind me of the
[166:20] uh a a story about Buddha and the king
[166:23] of the evil that happened 2,000 years
[166:26] ago is that the the king of the evil
[166:29] said okay my followers will go to your
[166:31] temple in the end of the world and uh
[166:34] the Buddha said it's okay because my
[166:36] follower will back to family. So what
[166:38] you just said it remind me of that and
[166:41] um and beside that there's always other
[166:44] uh predictions especially in China you
[166:47] know that China has thousands has
[166:49] predictions uh that already uh exist for
[166:54] at least 1,000 years and some of them
[166:57] are very accurate and um you mentioned
[167:01] that billions of people will be removed
[167:04] the same that in the Chinese prediction.
[167:06] So I accepted that now for years I
[167:10] accepted that it's hard but I accept
[167:12] that but I feel that it seems that it's
[167:14] just a movie but the end of the movie it
[167:18] seems the forces that they just
[167:20] mentioned the good ones the bad ones
[167:22] they want to change um they cannot
[167:26] change maybe main part of the movie but
[167:28] they try to use the virus of the ideas
[167:32] to impact who will become the one that
[167:35] uh exists. in the last. So I mean um why
[167:41] we matters why we
[167:45] why why people who last who last in the
[167:48] end matters to these different forces if
[167:52] I mean if the ends is the end of the
[167:55] world but who exist in the last matters
[167:57] to the different forces of the spirits
[168:00] it seems this is what they're working
[168:02] on.
[168:03] >> Thank you. Okay. So, um I I think we
[168:07] have to remember like the universe it is
[168:10] always a spiritual battle between the
[168:12] force of light and darkness, between
[168:13] good and evil. Okay. And um there's
[168:17] always going to be shift in this battle.
[168:22] And I think there's no point in thinking
[168:25] about the macro about the superructure
[168:27] of things, okay? because we're talking
[168:29] like thousands, millions of years and
[168:32] we're forces beyond our control. Um I
[168:35] think that we're here to live our best
[168:38] possible life and
[168:41] um it's always our choice whether or not
[168:44] to be a spark of light. Okay, to be a
[168:46] spark of light again is to say I matter,
[168:49] my life matters. I should just focus on
[168:51] the here and now and doing the best I
[168:53] can. and not being a spark of light.
[168:55] It's like, well, you know, I'm an NPC
[168:56] and like there's this huge war going on.
[168:59] I have no control over it, so like
[169:01] nothing I do matters. Okay. That's a
[169:03] choice you have to make as a person and
[169:05] no one can help you. Okay. All right. Uh
[169:08] uh back back there. Um what uh you and
[169:11] then you. Okay. We we'll grab two. Thank
[169:15] you.
[169:19] >> Okay. Yeah. So my question is um
[169:22] >> did you did you drive up again?
[169:24] >> Sorry.
[169:24] >> Did you drive up again?
[169:26] >> I drove up again. Six. Yeah, I did have
[169:27] some trouble at the border this time,
[169:29] but um that was not my question. Um so
[169:32] um this is more geopolitics. I know
[169:35] we've been talking about existential
[169:37] stuff, so this might be a little bit
[169:39] more grounded. Uh but the um day before
[169:42] yesterday, the plane hijacking, I find
[169:45] like I don't know if you've dug into the
[169:47] details, but I find it hard to believe
[169:49] like it's all very convenient. There was
[169:51] two pilots that were sitting behind um
[169:54] the nose dive. Should have had G forces
[169:57] that killed everyone but apparently
[169:58] didn't. Um the stabbing, the fact that
[170:01] it was just all Israelis on as
[170:04] passengers. So, do you believe it was a
[170:07] false flag? And if it is like
[170:10] are the normal citizens part of the plot
[170:13] or like the co-pilot who was stabbed are
[170:16] they just like um sort of victims in the
[170:18] whole like from the elites planning I
[170:20] guess and and also like what does it
[170:22] achieve like is it just for the
[170:24] elections to sort of us against them
[170:26] kind of narrative or like what is the
[170:28] overall objective if you believe it's a
[170:30] false flag? All
[170:31] right. Uh can you as well
[170:36] >> uh I have a question that do you believe
[170:39] in uh changing the system from within?
[170:42] So let's say uh we're not happy with the
[170:44] system. We got according to game three
[170:46] we got three options. We climb up the
[170:48] ladders and trying to influence the
[170:50] system. um we just trying to get by and
[170:53] put food on the table and then uh focus
[170:56] on ourel and our children and hope the
[170:58] the next generation will will make a
[171:00] better system or we trying to get out of
[171:02] the system and and and starting uh on
[171:05] our own which is a huge huge risk.
[171:07] >> Okay.
[171:10] So let let me answer this question
[171:11] first. Okay.
[171:14] >> Okay. There is no such thing as changing
[171:16] the system from within. Okay. There just
[171:18] is not.
[171:20] You can only change from within.
[171:23] Changing the system from within is your
[171:26] way of saying I want to be like them but
[171:30] not like them. That's just stupid. Okay,
[171:33] stop thinking like that. Just say like
[171:35] what I need to do is be the change
[171:38] myself. Change from within, not change
[171:41] the system from within.
[171:43] Okay. Um your question about the fly
[171:46] Dubai uh incident. Okay. So this go
[171:49] takes us back to separating pregnancy
[171:51] and what they believe about about the
[171:52] cabala. What they believe is this. No
[171:56] one else matters except me. Okay. So as
[171:59] long as I believe the narrative,
[172:03] then that's good enough. All right. So I
[172:06] don't know what happened in that
[172:07] incident, but you're absolutely right in
[172:09] that the official narrative makes no
[172:10] sense. And a lot of pilots who have have
[172:14] come out and said, "No, the story itself
[172:17] makes no sense." Okay, but this is not
[172:19] to say something did not happen on that
[172:21] plane, right? So, what might have
[172:24] happened was this. Something did happen
[172:25] on that plane and the Israeli media blew
[172:28] it up and then the uh politicians took
[172:32] advantage of it and create this
[172:34] narrative
[172:35] um that made Israel look good. Okay,
[172:39] doesn't make sense? So, I'm not saying
[172:41] I'm not saying it was probably not a
[172:43] false flag, but it was probably
[172:44] something that happened. It was pretty
[172:46] minor and then it got blown up. Okay.
[172:48] And why are the Israelis doing this?
[172:50] Because from their perspective, from the
[172:52] perspective of fansism, the world
[172:55] doesn't matter. The only that matters is
[172:57] Israel. If we, the Israel people can
[173:00] agree on something and we do it
[173:02] together, we can conquer the world.
[173:05] Okay. Does that make sense?
[173:11] >> Exactly. Okay. So the only thing that
[173:13] matters in the cabala is your
[173:15] relationship with God. If you have
[173:17] enough faith, you can do anything in the
[173:19] world.
[173:21] Okay? I don't need the world on my side.
[173:24] I don't need public opinion on my side.
[173:27] All I need is for God to be with me
[173:31] and for the Jews, for the Israelite
[173:34] people to stay united. That's all we
[173:36] need. And so whatever happens to to
[173:40] promote this agenda is good. Okay. So
[173:43] like these stories in the media they
[173:46] don't have to be true. What matters is
[173:48] the result. Okay. That that's other
[173:51] thing about sism which is like the only
[173:53] thing that matters is the result. Okay.
[173:55] The sin is part of the process to get us
[173:58] to the redemption. What matters is the
[174:00] redemption.
[174:02] Okay. Um yeah.
[174:06] Um, and I've got another question. So, I
[174:08] don't know of uh how I found this, but I
[174:11] read an article named um the Zionist
[174:14] origins of Islam. And uh according to
[174:16] the article, there was a eboli Jew
[174:19] Muhammad during the Romanian war in 620
[174:23] who rebuilt the temple uh at this time
[174:26] to and they waited for the coming back
[174:28] of Jesus, but Jesus never came back and
[174:30] so they went back to uh to the desert.
[174:32] So, Mecca and Medina. So does this
[174:34] influence uh or does this change did you
[174:36] know this? Okay.
[174:37] >> Yeah.
[174:40] Okay. So um one big question is the
[174:45] question of Islam. Where did it emerge
[174:47] from? Okay. And so again we have to
[174:51] appreciate that that that dynamic nature
[174:54] of the Middle East. Okay. They're always
[174:56] at war. They're always fighting these
[174:58] these religious wars. So uh what
[175:00] happened was this um during the three
[175:04] Roman wars
[175:05] a lot of Jews were forced to go into the
[175:09] Arabian desert. Okay, does that make
[175:11] sense? During these Roman wars, the
[175:14] Romans were massacring a lot of Jews,
[175:16] forcing them to find refuge in the
[175:18] desert because Romans don't like sand.
[175:20] Okay, they they they avoid the sand.
[175:23] um while they were in the desert, these
[175:26] Jewish communities were promoting a
[175:29] faith that influenced the um the Arab
[175:33] people. Okay? And one and and so they
[175:37] were implanting these ideas like the
[175:39] coming of the Messiah um in the Arab
[175:42] religion. And so when different
[175:44] communities come together, their
[175:45] religions also merge together. So a lot
[175:48] of the most powerful ideas from the
[175:49] Jewish religion started to seep into
[175:52] their beliefs, okay? Even though they
[175:54] were pagans. And one belief of course is
[175:56] the coming of the Messiah and the end of
[175:58] the world. Um and then
[176:02] um the turning point was
[176:05] the war between the Bisantines
[176:10] and the uh Persians. Okay. the
[176:13] Assassinian uh um and then um during
[176:18] this war uh there were a lot of refugees
[176:22] who were fleeing into Aryan desert and
[176:26] um
[176:28] there were Jews who were supporting the
[176:30] Persians and because of the Persian
[176:32] support these Jews were able to take
[176:34] over Jerusalem. Okay. But the problem is
[176:40] at that time Jerusalem was occupied by
[176:41] the Christians. The Christians called
[176:44] for help from the Bisantines. Um the
[176:47] emperor was Heracitis. Heracitis sent a
[176:50] massive army to relieve Jerusalem. And
[176:53] this army killed a lot of Jews. Okay. So
[176:56] and Christians and the Bian were killing
[176:58] Jews all over the place. And again
[177:00] remember in the Jewish faith in the
[177:03] darkest times comes the light. So the
[177:06] Messiah appears when all hope is lost.
[177:09] And so there's there's this messianic
[177:11] expectation that someone would emerge as
[177:14] the Messiah. And that person of course
[177:17] was Muhammad. Okay. So there probably
[177:19] different candidates, but Muhammad was
[177:21] the one who captured the imagination of
[177:23] both the Jews and the Muslims.
[177:26] And Muhammad
[177:29] as Messiah, what he promised was a
[177:31] direct connection to God. Okay? So
[177:35] because he was a messiah that energized
[177:37] the Arabs and the Jews to fight
[177:39] alongside him and because the Romans,
[177:42] the Bisantines and the Persians were
[177:44] very corrupt that allow the Arabs to
[177:46] sweep through the Lavant. Okay. The
[177:48] problem is that after Muhammad died,
[177:50] there's a power struggle and this power
[177:53] struggle um they um they basically erase
[177:59] all this history. Okay. It doesn't make
[178:00] sense because they they did not want to
[178:02] reveal the Jewish origins of Islam.
[178:06] Okay. All right. Um yeah, over here.
[178:10] >> I'm just going to ask something that uh
[178:12] we haven't talked about yet, but you've
[178:14] announced on podcasts. Um I don't know
[178:18] how much you'll be ready to talk about
[178:19] it, but maybe you can do us Montreal a
[178:22] privilege. Uh so you talked about a big
[178:26] project actually that uh that is kind of
[178:28] like offc course of of what you're kind
[178:30] of known for which is uh a school for
[178:32] profits.
[178:32] >> Y
[178:33] >> um yeah I'm just very curious your ideas
[178:36] and like what like that structure would
[178:39] look like just yeah just maybe a little
[178:42] preview of that.
[178:45] Okay. So um
[178:51] um I did mention
[178:53] um half and jazz that I will start
[178:55] eventually a university for profits.
[178:57] Okay. And so what I think is a long-term
[179:00] trajectory of humanity we are going to
[179:03] shift from an age of entrepreneurs to an
[179:06] age of profits.
[179:08] Okay. Meaning like before a lot of
[179:12] people that were we consider great
[179:14] entrepreneurs like people like Steve
[179:16] Jobs in a different era they would be
[179:18] prophets instead. Okay. Because like
[179:20] someone like Steve Jobs he was basically
[179:22] a prophet who made a lot of money right
[179:24] but he he was a great storyteller. He
[179:27] was messyic in his mission. Um he had a
[179:31] lot of energy. So I think um that we
[179:34] will shift from an environment that
[179:37] fosters entrepreneurship to an
[179:39] environment that that that fosters um uh
[179:42] prophecy. Okay. And um I'm pretty sure
[179:47] this this will happen. I'm trying to
[179:49] figure out who who in our world are most
[179:53] likely to be profits in the next world.
[179:55] Okay. And I have certain names in mind.
[179:57] people like Nick Fuentes, Sneo, Andrew
[180:00] Tate,
[180:02] um Joe Rogan. Okay, these names come in
[180:05] mind. That's why I actually choose to
[180:08] interact with them, okay? Cuz I'm trying
[180:09] to figure out who these people are, how
[180:11] they think, and how and how they would
[180:14] act in the age of prophets,
[180:16] okay? Um, and I mean these people are
[180:22] extremely talented and they're able to
[180:24] present a vision to the followers that
[180:27] captures their imagination. Okay? And
[180:29] they're very active people. They're very
[180:30] energetic. They're very active. Um,
[180:34] um, you know, I I'm very good friends of
[180:35] Sneo and I'm I've always been very
[180:37] impressed by um, his curiosity. I'm
[180:41] impressed by by his virtue as well
[180:43] because as you guys may know he's one of
[180:45] the few influential people in the world
[180:47] who refuses to take gambling money.
[180:49] Okay, he will not advertise gambling um
[180:52] even though he's losing millions of
[180:54] dollars in in revenue because of that.
[180:56] So I I respect that. Um someone like
[181:00] Andrew Tate I think will be very
[181:01] influential as well because what he's
[181:04] going through is basically martyrdom,
[181:06] persecution, right? So even though we're
[181:08] like, you know, he deserves this because
[181:09] he's a creep. Look, from the perspective
[181:12] of his followers, he's innocent. He did
[181:15] nothing wrong and he's being persecuted,
[181:17] okay? And like I think that um he may go
[181:20] to prison for a few years, but he'll
[181:22] he'll probably come out uh because he'll
[181:24] make a deal and he'll be a lot stronger
[181:26] because of it. Okay? So, I'm trying to
[181:28] figure out who these people are, where
[181:30] they come from, how they think. And um
[181:34] um I think that in the future there'll
[181:37] be more people people like that. Um and
[181:40] so
[181:42] when I start a university of profits,
[181:44] I'm not trying to say I want to direct
[181:47] um
[181:49] uh these people. I don't want to
[181:50] influence how they think. But what I
[181:52] want to do is um bring them together and
[181:56] give them the tools and the knowledge in
[182:00] order for them to achieve whatever
[182:02] prophecy that um they they want to
[182:05] achieve. Okay. So it's basically like um
[182:09] how do I position myself to to be the
[182:12] most relevant in the next phase of
[182:15] humanity? Okay. Does that make sense?
[182:18] Okay. All right. Um any more questions
[182:20] guys?
[182:22] Um if you have questions please please
[182:24] please raise your hand. Okay otherwise
[182:27] um this these two will be the last two
[182:29] questions. Okay so you Thomas and then
[182:31] you at the back. Okay and and and we
[182:33] have some food prepared for you thanks
[182:35] to Stella and Sophia.
[182:37] A quick question uh do you have pets and
[182:40] what do you think their their role are
[182:42] like cats, dogs or other animals to our
[182:44] spiritual evolution or something like
[182:46] this in the in the following word?
[182:50] Um, I don't have a pet. I we're thinking
[182:52] of we're trying to get a dog for for a
[182:54] kid. The problem is like they they don't
[182:57] they we're always moving around. So
[182:59] like, you know, we would definitely want
[183:02] our children to grow up with animals
[183:04] because we think that animals also
[183:07] channel the divine. Okay. All right. And
[183:09] then back there and this will be the
[183:11] last question. Okay.
[183:14] >> Concept or believe is
[183:17] >> in what? resets. Humanity resets.
[183:20] >> Okay. Yeah.
[183:22] >> Sorry.
[183:24] >> Yeah. So, the question is, are there
[183:26] resets in humanity? And like there's
[183:28] been a lot of resets. Okay. The most
[183:29] obvious, of course, is the branches
[183:31] collapse. And so what happens is
[183:35] that um I if if we believe that the
[183:39] universe is a war of these spiritual
[183:41] forces, eventually one certain force
[183:46] dominates in in a way that forces the
[183:49] world to be offbalanced. Okay. And we
[183:51] are very much in a time of reset, you
[183:54] know, where maybe the force of separism
[183:57] is too dominant. Um, and when that
[184:00] happens, then it's like the tower of
[184:02] babel, you know, it's it's going to fall
[184:04] down. Um, and so I think we are living
[184:08] in a time of the great reset. And I
[184:11] think that we are going to we are going
[184:13] to splinter. Okay. So I don't think that
[184:17] one age replaces another. I think that
[184:19] this one age that we're living in will
[184:21] break off into multiple possibilities.
[184:24] Okay? you have a possibility where uh
[184:27] that's promoted by people like Peter
[184:28] Theo which is called something that's
[184:29] called a network state bas basically a
[184:31] nation state controlled by a corporation
[184:33] okay um so imagine you know like the
[184:37] world falls apart but then Google has
[184:38] its own country uh meta has its own
[184:41] country okay so I think the network
[184:43] state is a very strong possibility we
[184:45] are going also into the age of prophets
[184:47] where you know these very charismatic
[184:51] figures will basically be warlords and
[184:54] have their own uh following. You have
[184:58] the like new religions popping up. Um
[185:01] you you'll have the emergence of like
[185:03] like a very multipolar world. Okay. And
[185:08] um in this world of the great reset,
[185:11] there's there are opportunities uh and
[185:14] new possibilities and I really want to
[185:17] be part
[185:19] of um
[185:22] of this transition. So I mean where I
[185:25] will differ from a lot of religious
[185:28] traditions is like you know if you're
[185:30] Buddhist or you're Hindu you think that
[185:32] this world is lost that this world is
[185:34] hopeless this world is of sin like those
[185:38] who commit sin are most likely to win in
[185:40] this world so let's give up this world
[185:42] and let's wait for the next world and
[185:44] I'm like no no that's not why we're here
[185:47] we're here to find a light even in
[185:49] darkness and it is and if we matter then
[185:53] we will struggle, we will fight for a
[185:56] better world. And that's how we prove we
[185:58] we matter. So I don't want to be an
[186:01] observer. I I want to be an actor. Uh
[186:04] but it's going to take some time before
[186:07] I'm able to uh do a lot of things that I
[186:09] want to do. And quite honestly, um I'm
[186:12] not yet quite sure what I really want to
[186:13] do. I think these things will appear to
[186:15] me as things progress. Okay. All right.
[186:20] So that's it, guys. Um, it's been a
[186:22] wonderful uh time. Uh, you know, I like
[186:26] after experiencing talking to you guys,
[186:27] I I have deep um feelings for Montreal.
[186:31] I I I think that u regardless of the
[186:34] problems in Montreal, I still think it's
[186:35] much more interesting, much more
[186:36] intellectual than Toronto.
[186:39] So, I hope I hope hope to do this again.
[186:42] Um, Salah Sophia, thank you so much for
[186:45] for today. You you guys have been
[186:46] working so hard. Um, so there's food.
[186:51] Uh, let's mingle. Let let's get to uh
[186:53] get get to know each other. And uh I'll
[186:55] see you guys next time. Okay. Okay.