马未都陈晓卿剖析中国饭局潜规则 称挑剔舌头方能倒逼顶级烹饪

一顿饭看出过得好不好,穷人吃饭比富人还挑剔!到底是矫情还是生存智慧?答案颠覆认知! #圆桌派 #窦文涛 #经济 #金融 #推荐 #纪实 — 纪实万象

纪实万象

顶级饮食审美与餐饮品质依赖数代人的品味积淀与严苛食客,缺乏鉴赏基准的盲从消费必然导致资本炒作劣币驱逐良币。

AI-assisted summary of 一顿饭看出过得好不好,穷人吃饭比富人还挑剔!到底是矫情还是生存智慧?答案颠覆认知! #圆桌派 #窦文涛 #经济 #金融 #推荐 #纪实 — original source. Check the original for full context.

Source published:

Key ideas

  • 餐桌细节常折射阶层与生活经验,湘西土匪曾借饥饿儿童吃鱼时挑背肉、鱼腩或鱼鳃月牙肉的习惯,来精准推测人质家境并决定赎金多寡。 (0:00)
  • 中西饮食文化在就餐节奏与体验心态上存在深刻鸿沟:西方视米其林等顶级正餐如听古典乐般专注菜品层次,而传统中式宴席重在社交应酬与推杯换盏,食物常沦为背景。 (27:44)
  • 买单文化呈现出鲜明的代际与地域断层,从老派商人和北京人抢单彰显面子,转向当代年轻群体借助移动支付普及AA制与相亲平摊账单。 (46:17)
  • 餐饮界存在商业化扩张与品质坚守的矛盾,风口炒作容易导致劣币驱逐良币,而真正的极致鲜味与匠心往往隐匿于民间市井而非高成本商业街区。 (39:30)

Detailed notes

## Background 本期内容由YouTube频道“纪实万象”于2026年10月4日发布。视频结合了《圆桌派》的对谈形式与《锵锵行天下》第三季的未播素材拾遗,由主持人窦文涛携手文化圈老友,以平等的圆桌对谈形式神侃世间万象与人情社会。

## TL;DR 节目围绕中国人的饮食习惯、饭局社交与人情账目展开了深度漫谈。窦文涛与嘉宾们从土匪以“吃鱼挑部位”识别人质阶层的江湖规矩讲起,延伸到南北饮食风味差异、米其林精致餐饮与中式合餐的文化断层,以及现代网红餐饮背后的虚火。众人进而剖析了中式饭局中敬酒、抢买单、AA制背后的面子博弈与代际观念变迁,并结合老上海掌故、民国逸闻与古玩交易,层层揭示出中国人借由餐桌折射出的人情潜规则、生存智慧与市井尊严。

## Atmosphere & style 整场谈话弥漫着老友重逢般的惬意与微醺松弛感,谈笑风生中又暗藏着老辣犀利的世故洞察。窦文涛的自嘲插科打诨与金宇澄、马未都等嘉宾绘声绘色的掌故漫谈配合默契,从荒诞戏谑的餐桌车祸现场自然过渡到发人深省的文化心理剖析。聆听体验如同在深夜私房小馆旁听文化名宿吃酒摆龙门阵,既有烟火气十足的江湖幽默,又有沉淀着岁月痕迹的人文底蕴。

## Bulletin - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=0s) 餐桌细节常折射阶层与生活经验,湘西土匪曾借饥饿儿童吃鱼时挑背肉、鱼腩或鱼鳃月牙肉的习惯,来精准推测人质家境并决定赎金多寡。 - [27:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=1664s) 中西饮食文化在就餐节奏与体验心态上存在深刻鸿沟:西方视米其林等顶级正餐如听古典乐般专注菜品层次,而传统中式宴席重在社交应酬与推杯换盏,食物常沦为背景。 - [46:17](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=2777s) 买单文化呈现出鲜明的代际与地域断层,从老派商人和北京人抢单彰显面子,转向当代年轻群体借助移动支付普及AA制与相亲平摊账单。 - [39:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=2370s) 餐饮界存在商业化扩张与品质坚守的矛盾,风口炒作容易导致劣币驱逐良币,而真正的极致鲜味与匠心往往隐匿于民间市井而非高成本商业街区。

## Key takeaways - [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=0s) 吃鱼的第一筷能暴露人的家境教养:贫苦孩子图饱吃背肉,殷实人家吃鱼腩,极度娇贵的少爷则精准直奔鳃后月牙肉。 - [06:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=369s) 点菜是一门综合心理学与架构艺术,需依据宾客身份、食量比例与餐厅真实招牌定制,盲从服务员推荐常易沦为清理高毛利或临期存货的工具。 - [09:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=597s) 食物鉴赏力需要长期日常经验的积累,野味因缺乏日常高频反复的烹饪演练,往往极难在厨艺上达到家畜肉类的精妙高度。 - [11:28](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=688s) 中式社交饭局分工明确,存在局长(核心主宾)、局托(暖场接梗)、局补(补位缓和)与局奴(结账买单)等演化角色。 - [19:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=1190s) 地域社交逻辑差异明显:北方特别是北京圈子人际关系盘根错节且规矩繁多,南方如深圳与上海则更加务实松弛、注重界限。 - [25:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=1505s) 顶级美食是被挑剔的食客逼出来的,所谓“三代出贵族”,普遍吃饱饭时间尚短的社会对于精细餐饮维度的系统审美仍在建立期。 - [34:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=2053s) 中餐馆常面临商业化陷阱,专注打磨厨艺往往难赚大钱,盲目连锁扩张则导致品控崩塌与形式主义泛滥(如菜品无效雕花)。 - [36:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=2216s) 潮汕菜被视作中华饮食活态博物馆,得益于南方丰沛物产及未断层的历史积淀,完整保留了秦汉脍炙与宋代古法风味。 - [39:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=2370s) 快餐式资本炒作使得热门品类(如潮汕牛肉火锅)迅速被透支,若缺乏成熟鉴赏力的食客支撑,餐饮行业极易陷入劣币驱逐良币的困局。 - [42:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=2542s) 极致的鲜味往往大隐隐于市井与民间小摊(如番禺午夜现杀猪杂粥),中国人对“现宰现吃”的鲜感执念与西方追求熟成的肉食哲学形成对比。 - [46:17](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=2777s) “抢买单”本质是人情社会的权力与面子博弈,而年轻一代在移动支付普及下迅速接受算到分角的AA制,重塑了传统男女社交与相亲规则。 - [01:08:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=4101s) 中国文化中的“面子”不仅包含相互尊重,更要求外在显露的“光彩”与加码回赠的心理平衡,与西方或日本避免给他人添负担的习惯大不相同。 - [01:17:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=4624s) 全天候无偿接客的“流水席”折射出极致的社交人格,在现代都市中逐步消亡,但在广大乡村白事礼俗(三天大办、越远越尊)中依然深度存续。 - [01:19:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=4758s) 上海婚宴讲究严密的社交密码(Social Code)与人情记账本,在精明务实与群体攀比之间承受着极高的人情面子成本。 - [01:27:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=5232s) 老上海文化中对“卖相”和体面的执念深入骨髓,哪怕囊中羞涩也要一丝不苟,跑堂伙计借扫视衣领商标即可掂量客人阶层。

## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=0s) Dining Habits, Character, and the Bandit Fish Test

The conversation opens with reflections on how table manners and dining habits reveal a person's inner nature, from how fast they move their chopsticks to how long they scrutinize the dishes before taking a bite. Hesitating over the plate reveals pickiness, as the diner searches for the prime cut—whether it is the leg or a specific choice morsel.

This observation leads into a historical anecdote attributed to Shen Congwen regarding the bandits of western Hunan. When these outlaws kidnapped a child for ransom, they would starve the child for three days before serving them a freshly cooked fish to determine the family's socioeconomic status: - **Big Chunks of Body Meat**: If the famished child dug into the large, fleshy chunks, the bandits concluded the child came from an ordinary, impoverished household and released them immediately. - **Belly Meat**: If the child targeted the tender fish belly, the bandits recognized some domestic privilege and held them for a moderate ransom. - **Cheek Meat**: If the child bypassed the rest of the fish and reached straight for the prized, crescent-shaped cheek meat behind the gill on their very first bite, the bandits knew they had captured the most pampered darling of an elite household. The family would be extorted relentlessly until driven to the brink of bankruptcy.

---

[01:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=68s) Hosting Hou Hsiao-hsien and the Old Men's Dinner Club

The group turns to Chen Xiaoqing’s legendary standing in the Beijing culinary world, recalling the time Taiwanese filmmaker Hou Hsiao-hsien came to visit. Dou Wentao and his colleagues wanted to entertain Hou without leaving the relaxed comfort of their company balcony. They turned to Chen Xiaoqing, who arranged for an internationally renowned master chef to cater the gathering directly on-site, delivering a meticulously planned menu two days in advance. Dou jokes about the luxuries of having such connections, before teasing Liang Wendao about his commercial ventures, remarking that since modern literary intellectuals struggle to make a living purely on culture, Wendao has resorted to selling wine and snacks.

As sake and red wine are poured, Dou brings up Chen Xiaoqing’s reputation across Beijing dining circles. Wang Xiaofeng of *Sanlian Life Weekly* famously documented the "Old Men's Dinner Club" (*老男人饭局*)—a regular dining circle featuring cultural figures like Luo Yonghao, Lao Liu (Zhang Lixian), and Wang Xiaofeng himself. According to Wang, the culinary standard of their gatherings skyrocketed the moment Chen Xiaoqing joined, as Chen spent his days scouting hidden gems. Urban legend held that when Chen once lost his mobile phone, it contained a personal database of thousands of restaurants, complete with exact dish selections and specific instructions to give the kitchen staff. Chen modestly downplays rumors—such as the claim that he could taste subtle recipe variations between different domestic Yoshinoya fast-food branches—admitting he rarely eats fast food unless stuck working late at the office.

---

[03:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=224s) Hebei Sausage and Lao Liu's Agonizing Ordering Rituals

Dou Wentao serves a plate of homemade northern-style sausage cured by a relative's grandmother in Hebei, offering a humble taste of his hometown. Chen Xiaoqing is then asked to reflect on the sheer frequency of his dining marathons. Chen admits he has long lost count; at the peak of the dinner club's activity, the core group met every single day for an entire week, constantly brainstorming daily themes and scouting the next evening's destination.

A central charm of these gatherings was the host, Lao Liu (Zhang Lixian), who insisted on delivering an earnest, formal opening monologue at every meal. Even when it was just the same four familiar friends sitting around the table, Lao Liu introduced each guest as if they were meeting for the first time, respectfully detailing their recent accomplishments and activities. Jiang Fangzhou recalls attending gatherings where Lao Liu was left to order without Chen Xiaoqing present, describing it as an excruciating ordeal. Lao Liu would agonize over the menu, flipping endlessly back and forth; Wang Xiaofeng used to joke that Lao Liu's ordering strategy was entirely mechanical, simply counting down and picking the sixth dish on every single page.

---

[06:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=369s) The Architecture of Ordering and the Perils of Waiter Recommendations

The table examines the subtle craft of composing a meal, which Dou Wentao compares to the classic poetic imagery of mountain peaks and ridges—presenting varied heights, textures, and rhythms from every angle. Dou mentions an acquaintance who could coordinate bespoke meals at fine-dining venues in Paris or Hong Kong purely over WeChat, dictating custom sequences directly to the chef without consulting a menu. Chen Xiaoqing explains his own philosophy: - **Tailoring to Guests**: A curated menu must cater to who is sitting at the table. When hosting an intellectual figure like Liang Wendao, Chen selects refined, slightly pretentious dishes highlighting delicate broths, roots, and understated ingredients; for northern diners, hearty, carbohydrate-centric staple courses are mandatory. - **Portion Control and Signatures**: A host must know a restaurant's portion scale in advance and identify its one or two true standout signature dishes, ignoring the forgettable filler that pads out most menus. - **Navigating Online Reviews**: On public review platforms, Chen applies a process of elimination, immediately filtering out venues that pay for advertising or push cheap promotional deals. - **The Pitfalls of Waiter Recommendations**: While asking waitstaff for suggestions works in elite establishments with genuine professional integrity, in average domestic restaurants servers simply steer patrons toward high-margin dishes to earn sales commissions. Similarly, in many Western bistros, the "catch of the day" is rarely the freshest selection; rather, it is often a kitchen tactic used to clear aging, unsold seafood inventory before it spoils.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: The Bandit Fish Test accDescr: A decision flow showing how Xiangxi bandits determined ransom based on which part of a fish a kidnapped child ate after three days of starvation.

A["Kidnap child & starve for 3 days"] --> B["Serve freshly cooked fish"] B --> C{"Which part does child eat first?"}

C -->|"Large chunks of body meat"| D["Impoverished child"] C -->|"Fish belly"| E["Middle-class / comfortable family"] C -->|"Cheek / crescent meat behind gill"| F["Most pampered darling of elite family"]

D --> G["Release immediately"] E --> H["Hold for modest ransom"] F --> I["Demand massive ransom until family goes bankrupt"] ```

[09:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=597s) The Taste System, Discernment, and Wild Game

The conversation opens with a quick note on commercial hospitality and turnover—how restaurants must lower prices to move inventory quickly when ordering large volumes of delicate ingredients like Gillardeau oysters. Dou Wentao pivots to ask Chen Xiaoqing what he considers the best food he has ever eaten, to which Chen Xiaoqing unhesitatingly answers, "Home-cooked food."

When the question turns to Jiang Fangzhou, she self-deprecatingly admits that she possesses virtually no refined palate and functions essentially as a "human Yelp review site" (大众点评). Incapable of judging culinary quality on her own, she relies entirely on external authorities: if Chen Xiaoqing praises a sausage, she finds it delicious; if Liang Wendao subsequently disagrees, she is left stranded without an internal benchmark, humorously asking whether that makes her a robot. The panel points out that discernment requires a lifetime of comparative experience. A person who has eaten white rice every day of their life can instantly recognize an impeccably cooked bowl of premium rice; without an accumulated baseline, serving someone a remarkably expensive vintage wine is utterly meaningless.

The discussion links this principle to the late epicure Chua Lam's (蔡澜) frequent admonition against eating wild game. The guests agree that eating wild animals is pointless because diners lack the cultural habit and sensory baseline to evaluate them. Crucially, the culinary failure lies with the kitchen: chefs undergo daily, repetitive training with domestic meats like pork, mastering every joint, muscle fiber, and cut through hundreds of iterations. Because chefs lack systematic, daily practice with wild animals, wild game almost never yields culinary excellence.

---

[11:28](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=688s) Anatomy of the Chinese "Dinner Party" (Fanju)

Moving beyond casual meals between friends, the table examines the intricate subculture of the Chinese "dinner party" (*fanju*), which functions less as a culinary gathering and more as a high-stakes arena of social etiquette, diplomacy, and interpersonal warfare. Dou Wentao marvels at the specialized internet slang categorizing the participants of formal business or networking banquets:

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Roles in a Chinese Fanju accDescr: Hierarchy of specialized roles at a Chinese social dinner party. A["Party Lead<br/>(Guest of Honor / Target)"] --- B["Party Shill<br/>(Atmosphere & Toast Escort)"] B --- C["Party Pro<br/>(Cover & Damage Control)"] C --- D["Party Slave<br/>(Bill Payer / Tab Handler)"] ```

- **The Party Lead (局长 / 主宾):** The primary target of the dinner. They occupy the seat of honor, and the entire gathering is orchestrated to flatter, woo, or win them over, whether they are aware of the setup or not. - **The Party Shill (局托):** Guests recruited specifically to liven up the room, initiate toasts, and maintain high spirits so the atmosphere never falters. - **The Party Pro (局补):** A strategic backup for the shill, responsible for smoothing over conversational miscues, managing social friction, and patching up awkward moments. - **The Party Slave (局奴 / 买单侠):** The unwitting or resigned participant designated solely to foot the bill at the end of the evening.

The panel compares regional networking styles, contrasting the dinner cultures of Shanghai and Beijing. In Shanghai, social arrangements follow clear boundaries and realistic commitments: if you ask an intermediary to set up a meal with an esteemed contact, they will check schedules directly, refuse to make empty promises on the spot, and proceed only if schedules align. Beijing's social scene, by contrast, is characterized by performative familiarity and boisterous over-promising. An acquaintance will loudly boast, "I was with him just yesterday—I'll call him over right this second!" If the person actually shows up, they immediately claim a prior engagement elsewhere, making a show of staying briefly; if they fail to appear, the host provides endless excuses the next day, claiming sudden illness and urging you to wait just one more day.

---

[14:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=841s) Awkward Encounters and the Bill-Paying Culture

Dou Wentao shares a notorious dinner-party scenario where casual acquaintances exploit someone's name to inflate their own social capital. A remote acquaintance will unexpectedly call from another table or another city, loudly announcing on speakerphone in front of their dining companions, "I'm sitting right next to an exceptionally talented, beautiful woman who would be perfect for your show—didn't you ask me for recommendations last time?" They then thrust the phone at their guest, forcing an awkward, unearned conversation purely to show off their supposed clout. Jiang Fangzhou laughs knowingly, observing that she has witnessed these schemes firsthand and realized just how crafty older men in these networking circles can be.

The conversation naturally shifts to the ritual of paying the bill. In Chinese social dining, men traditionally rush to pick up the tab. One speaker admits to hating when others pay for them, preferring to settle the account themselves because they took charge of ordering, or turning the bill into a lighthearted guessing game where whoever guesses closest pays.

This is contrasted with dining etiquette in Japan. A Japanese male student recounted to one of the guests that offering to pay for a woman's meal in Japan is viewed as a massive, consequential gesture—often interpreted as an explicit romantic proposition rather than casual courtesy. Furthermore, the panel discusses the agonizing communication norms among Japanese youth: - Women may wait three full days before replying to a message, leaving the notification entirely unopened. - Rather than indicating dislike, this delay stems from viewing a response as a serious obligation and psychological burden; they postpone opening messages until they have dedicated time to craft a proper reply. - Conversational indirectness is pervasive: when asked for an evaluation, a polite "It doesn't look bad" almost invariably translates to "It's not very good."

---

[17:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=1078s) Solving Problems at the Dinner Table and Blind Dates

Returning to domestic dining, the panel reflects on the entrenched Chinese conviction that "there is no problem that cannot be solved over a meal; if one meal can't solve it, two meals will." The dinner table remains the primary venue for negotiation, conflict resolution, and matchmaking. While blind-date banquets do not guarantee a high romantic success rate, they ensure immediate, substantive interaction.

Dou Wentao recalls acting as a matchmaker for his friend Quan Yongxian ("Uncle Quan", the celebrated screenwriter of the espionage drama *The Cliff* / 《悬崖》). The matchmaking unravelled due to Quan's boundless love for alcohol: when the party wrapped up and Dou instructed him to escort the woman home, Quan stubbornly refused to peel himself away from the bottle, pleading, "Where are you guys going to drink next? Don't leave me out, I'm coming with you!"

The segment concludes on why the banquet remains indispensable for conducting business in China. A regular conference room or formal office setting is too rigid and constraining. Around a dining table, relaxed by food and alcohol, people can speak truths and make concessions that would be impermissible in a formal setting, and such overtures are far more readily tolerated under the guise of casual drinking. Yet, balancing these delicate dynamics makes organizing a successful dinner party one of the most grueling social tasks in Chinese professional life.

[19:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=1190s) 文化圈饭局的尴尬与“北京式社交”的疲倦

知识分子与文化圈的聚餐往往暗流涌动。窦文涛与嘉宾们聊到组织饭局的难处,甚至有人为此“坚决辞职”不再组局。曾有人连办了一年老男人的聚会,结果席间有两位互相看不顺眼,其中一人整晚把脸侧向一旁,宁可背对着邻座吃饭也要摆出无视的姿态。最惨痛的翻车经历是组局者不了解文化圈错综复杂的八卦,不慎将某位男士的三位前女友同时请到了现场,而该男士当天甚至还带着现任女友。现场最终闹得不可收拾,甚至有女嘉宾当场痛哭,场面极其尴尬。

这种人际张力凸显出在不同城市生存的社交成本。窦文涛感慨在某些地方生活特别心累,需要时刻绷紧神经、保持极高的“察言观色”能力: - **北京 vs. 深圳/香港**:在深圳等地交流往往更放松、就事论事,而北京的社交圈则盘根错节,“这个人不能见那个人,谁跟谁有宿怨”,稍不留神就会踩雷。 - **好莱坞华裔女演员的困惑**:一位刚回国的好莱坞华裔女星性格单纯直接,以为大家都是朋友,席间接到另一个局的电话便热络答应“饭后带大家一起过去玩”,结果买单后众人借故四散离去,只剩她一人赴约。席间长辈点破:“在有些地方,人与人之间是有壁垒的,不是所有人都能同坐一张桌子。”

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 社交饭局的尴尬与潜规则 accDescr: 展示文化圈饭局因人际恩怨导致的尴尬局面以及南北城市的社交差异。 subgraph G1["饭局车祸现场"] A["不明内情的组局者"] --> B["请来同桌嘉宾"] B --> C["互有宿怨者背向而坐"] B --> D["现任女友与三位前女友同台"] D --> E["席间情绪崩溃、现场大乱"] end subgraph G2["地域社交心理对比"] F["北京圈子:讲究情商与站队,禁忌多、心累"] G["深圳/南方:讲究务实与松弛,少有人际纠葛"] end ```

[22:16](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=1336s) 一人食的乐趣与“最后买单才求人”的中国式饭局

面对复杂的饭局政治,作家嘉宾直言自己更偏爱“一人食”或单纯在饭局上“只吃不讲”。作为写作者,独自坐在餐馆静听邻桌闲聊反而是观察众生百态的最佳窗口: - **听邻桌聊天辨地域**:满耳朵都在高谈阔论时政话题的,必是北京;如果满桌都在算计生意经、讨论股票与买卖的,多半是上海或浙江人。 - **“求人办事”的餐桌尴尬**:中国人托人办事的聚餐往往别扭至极。整顿饭大家都在东拉西扯、言不及义,彼此心知肚明却都憋着不说。直到服务员准备拿账单、马上要散席的最后一刻,求人者才“撑不住”似地顺带提上两句。这种看似客气的遮掩,反而显得虚伪且不够体面。

[23:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=1436s) 筷子下的阶层密码:土匪以“吃鱼”定赎金

饭桌不仅能照出人情世故,更能从极小的动作中折射性格与家境,例如动筷的速度、盯看菜肴的眼神与时长等。盯着一道菜细看半天才下箸的人,往往内心极度挑剔,在暗自琢磨哪块肉最嫩、哪一部分是精华。

席间分享了一个老土匪通过“吃鱼”识别人质家境的江湖规矩: - **绑架儿童后先饿三天**:土匪绑来孩子后不施刑,先饿上三天,随后端上一整条鱼让他吃。 - **第一筷吃背肉**:如果孩子一上来就夹鱼背上肉多、大块的地方,说明是穷苦人家的孩子,没见过大鱼大肉,只要填饱肚子,土匪通常直接放人或索要极低赎金。 - **第一筷挑鱼肚**:如果精准奔向刺少肥嫩的鱼腩肉,说明是殷实人家,需要多关押几天换取赎金。 - **第一筷夹鱼鳃月牙肉/鱼头**:如果孩子筷子极刁,第一口就去挑鱼脸颊上那块最嫩的“月牙肉”或是鱼头精髓,说明这是大富大贵之家集万千宠爱于一身的娇贵少爷,土匪便会咬死天价赎金,“不把家里敲骨吸髓、敲到破产绝不放人”。

[25:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=1505s) “三代出贵族”:挑剔的食客才能逼出顶级美食

从吃鱼的讲究延伸到当代餐饮,一位国内从事餐饮服务行业的朋友曾感叹:“无论细节做得多精致、多考究,往往都像对牛弹琴,中国客人似乎并不在意。”在日本,就餐时不赞美厨师的手艺会被视为极其失礼;但在国内,除了熟人私宴,客人们很少由衷夸奖菜品。

这种现象引发了关于饮食文化的深层讨论: - **仓廪实的积累年限**:所谓“三代才出一个真正的美食家”,而中国社会普遍吃饱饭的时间其实还不足四十年,大众对于食物精细维度的审美仍在建立过程中。 - **好厨子是被挑剔的舌头逼出来的**:许多人盲目认为中国菜在各方面必然超越西餐,但顶尖美食的前提是有极度挑剔的食客群体。 - **北方包容 vs. 岭南讲究**:在北方(如东北),朋友请客往往是“定哪儿去哪儿”,大家随和、不挑剔,即便饭菜差强人意也一笑而过;但到了广州,若提议去某家平庸餐馆,同行者会强烈反对并坚决否决。广州食客犹如面对满柜华服仍抱怨“没衣服穿”的年轻女孩,这种对食物百般挑剔、精益求精的“幸福烦恼”,恰恰孕育了高水准的饮食沃土。

[27:38](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=1658s) 米其林三星团的滑铁卢:中西进餐节奏的文化断层

一位朋友曾组织中国高净值客户前往欧洲展开“米其林三星朝圣之旅”,费尽心思提前一年订齐了巴黎和西班牙最难预约的顶级餐厅,结果整趟行程却以惨败告终。

餐馆与中国食客双方都极为痛苦,核心原因在于深层的饮食文化冲突: - **被折磨的中国胃与社交习惯**:西餐正餐讲究按顺序道道上菜,一顿饭吃上四五个小时,席间节奏极慢。习惯了大声谈笑、热烈社交的中国客人坐不住,不仅觉得繁文缛节束缚,更觉得分量少、吃不饱、味道不对胃口,抱怨连连。 - **“一桌摆满”与“道道相续”的心态差异**:中式传统宴席是凉热菜肴呼啦啦摆满一桌,进退自由——想吃就动几筷,想聊就放下筷子碰杯,节奏完全由食客掌控,可长可短。而西式或日式怀石料理要求客人如“钉在座位上”一般配合后厨的出菜节奏,十余道菜循序渐进,若有人中途频频起身敬酒走动,后厨出菜与前厅节奏彻底被打乱,原本享受的盛宴最终沦为尴尬与折磨。

[29:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=1784s) 东西方饮食心态与名厨地位的落差

窦文涛与嘉宾们探讨了中西方就餐心态与仪式感的巨大差异。西方人去米其林三星餐厅,或日本人前往顶级割烹,心态庄重肃穆得如同去听一场古典音乐会。客人往往为了一顿晚餐提前一整天做心理准备,全程神情紧绷、极度专注;尤其是面对工序繁复的现代分子料理,一盘菜里可能包含十几种食材与复杂的调味技法,食客必须全神贯注才能辨析其中的层次。然而,中国人吃饭讲究的是放松、热闹,“醉翁之意不在酒,在乎山水之间也”。很多人在席间眼睛盯的是同桌的美女,聊的是生意和八卦,饭菜本身的滋味反而退居其次。

这种对食物本体的漫不经心,在暴发户和商务应酬中尤为明显。嘉宾们感叹,不少第一代民营企业家出身农家,生活作风粗粝,住五星级酒店和经济型青旅对他们而言没有区别,根本不在乎床垫的软硬程度。香港某些商界老板一顿饭豪掷数十万港币,满场只是“兄弟来、兄弟去”碰杯痛饮,高谈阔论动辄上亿的生意,桌上昂贵的顶级佳肴几乎成了摆设。席间有人提到一件真实趣事:一位五十多岁的朋友好客,擅自将儿子珍藏的苏格兰单一麦芽威士忌拿出来招待一帮老哥们儿畅饮,结果儿子回家后气得当场发火,直言并非小气不给长辈喝,而是这群长辈根本不懂威士忌的品鉴门道,如此牛饮纯属暴殄天物。

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: 东西方顶级就餐体验心态对比 accDescr: 对比西方/日本就餐的严谨专注与中国饭局注重社交应酬的心态差异。 subgraph West["西方与日本高档餐饮"] direction TB W1["态度如同听古典音乐会<br/>庄严、专注、紧绷"] --> W2["聚焦食物本身<br/>解构分子料理与多层风味"] end subgraph East["传统中式饭局现象"] direction TB E1["意在言外、功夫在诗外<br/>注重社交排场与人际互动"] --> E2["商务应酬推杯换盏<br/>顶级食材与佳酿易被虚掷"] end ```

这种心态也深刻影响了厨师在社会中的职业地位: - **名厨合影的文化误解**:嘉宾曾带演艺界明星朋友在香港一家顶级粤菜馆用餐,恰逢一位名震全港、退隐后偶尔客串掌勺的泰斗级老主厨。饭后老主厨热情上前与嘉宾打招呼并提议合影,明星的随行经纪人却满脸警惕,当场质问:“你这照片不会发微信朋友圈吧?”甚至担心对方借合影做商业招牌贴在店墙上。 - **东西方名厨地位的反差**:在欧洲,食客得知主厨是米其林三星名师时,无不争先恐后与其合影、致敬;奥地利、瑞典等国元首用餐完毕,也会郑重赠礼向大厨道谢。而国内许多人骨子里仍轻视厨师行当,未将其视为艺术家或饮食大师。

---

[34:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=2053s) 餐饮商业化的陷阱与北方“形式主义”排场

席间话题转入餐饮业的核心痛点:为什么许多中餐馆开业初期惊艳,过了一阵子味道却急剧下滑?嘉宾剖析,这是因为“专心做好菜”与“追求商业利益”往往背道而驰。一个厨师如果全情投入精雕细琢,往往赚不到大钱,甚至客单价高得难以为继;而一旦名声在外、门庭若市,经营者便难挡诱惑疯狂扩张开分店。分店一多,供应链与厨师手艺便彻底失控,菜品品质断崖式下跌。

更糟糕的是,很多餐厅将精力耗费在与烹饪本质无关的形式主义上。窦文涛对菜盘里雕龙画凤的现象深恶痛绝,直言在国际烹饪大赛中,评委甚至会调侃:“如果第一名给中国,光看他们雕大凤凰的工夫就够了,我们干脆从第二名开始评吧。”河北有句俗话叫“驴粪球儿表面光”,一盘菜只要开始雕龙刻凤,就意味着后厨把力气用偏了。

窦文涛随后吐槽了自己在北京吃炸酱面的一次荒诞经历: - 一家号称有规矩的北京炸酱面馆大摆排场,从门口迎宾到里屋设有足足“十八道门”,每进一道门都有堂倌高声接力通报:“贵客里面请!您贵姓?”窦文涛答“免贵姓窦”,于是一路“窦爷一位”、“窦爷里面请”的吆喝声层层传递回荡,仪式感十足地将人送进小包厢。 - 然而,如此大动干戈换来的炸酱面,面酱却坨成硬块。跑堂的服务员打扮得如同清代宫廷太监,围在桌边殷勤询问要不要拿去重新加热,形式大于内容,令人啼笑皆非。 - 窦文涛坦言,北京虽为全国资源与财富汇聚的首善之区,但平日里要想在街头随缘偶遇一家真正可口的馆子极其困难,导致他常年在北京出差时宁愿窝在酒店吃客房送餐,也不愿外出踩雷。

---

[36:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=2216s) 南北饮食风味差异与潮汕古法的历史积淀

与北方容易遭遇形式主义形成鲜明对照的是,中国南方的市井餐饮展现出极高的平均水准。金宇澄分享了一则轶事:王三表(王小峰)身在成都时打电话问他哪里有好吃的,金宇澄根本不知道对方下榻的具体地址,便在电话里随口指点:“你直接下楼往前走,看到第二家馆子就进去吃。”结果王三表吃完大为惊艳,特意写了一篇长博客盛赞金宇澄推荐神准——这背后其实是南方餐饮极高的密度与靠谱的品控基础。

围绕北方口味相对粗犷、南方更为细腻的现象,嘉宾们从历史与地理农业文明的角度进行了剖析: - **人口与经济重心的历史推移**:葛剑雄教授的历史人口与地理研究显示,西汉虽然建都长安,但两汉以降,长江中下游地区的人口密度与经济实力便逐渐占据主导地位。 - **农业耕作制决定饮食精细度**:北方受气候限制,传统农业多为一年一熟或两年三熟;南方水热充沛,普遍能做到一年两熟甚至三熟。充裕的物产不仅催生了江南文人精细温婉的审美情趣,也赋予了南方饮食更深厚的研磨空间。

在南方饮食版图之中,广东潮汕(潮州、汕头)被一致推崇为中国饮食文化的“孤岛奇迹”: - **食在潮汕的标杆地位**:美食圈公认,如果一个人自命为饕餮美食家却从未去过汕头,那便算不上真正的美食家。 - **活化石般的历史风味层叠**:潮汕菜极其罕见地保留了中原正统饮食的古法基因,宛如北宋开封府食肆遗风在岭南的延续。这里的菜肴带有深厚的历史地质层,例如极薄的生鱼片(鱼生)源自秦汉时期的脍炙传统,发酵酒调味带有两宋古意,连一道传统的潮州甜芋泥都保留着极其纯正精妙的宋代风骨,是一座不可多得的中华饮食活态博物馆。

[39:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=2370s) 网红餐饮风潮与“劣币驱逐良币”的餐饮困境

窦文涛与嘉宾们聊到近年来国内餐饮界频繁出现的风口炒作现象。从以往的小龙虾,到去年的重庆小面,再到眼下火爆的潮汕牛肉火锅,几乎每年都会有一个风口被推到极致,随后迅速被透支玩坏。席间有人提到,现在潮汕牛肉店里一名熟练的切肉师傅月薪竟能高达三万元,甚至高过了许多在场媒体人的薪资。这背后显然不是天然的市场自发成长,而是资本和营销高度操纵的结果。

对于稍有辨别力的老饕来说,其中的水分一尝便知:真正的汕头黄牛肉与注水牛肉口感和成本差异巨大,可一旦切成薄片摆上餐桌,普通消费者很难分辨出差别。在中国的生活仿佛要求人人成为专家,否则无论喝茶还是吃饭,随时都会被忽悠。品味本身是需要门槛和积淀的系统——就像喝茶,初学者喝不出门道,只有深入之后才能区分“红印”与“宋聘”;可对大部分缺乏鉴赏力的食客而言,商家说什么就是什么。这正如京剧的式微,并非艺术本身不好,而是懂得欣赏的人群消失了。

这种品味认知的断层引发了更深层的担忧:中国各行各业是否正陷入“劣币驱逐良币”的泥潭?认真把品质和细节做到极致、倾注全部心血的店,往往因成本高昂而入不敷出、难以为继;反而对门那些靠噱头、廉价原料与营销炒作的铺子赚得盆满钵满,疯狂开分店。长此以往,劣质商业模式可能将真正有追求的匠心挤出主流市场。

[42:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=2542s) 民间寻味:大隐隐于市的人间烟火与极致鲜味

尽管商业餐饮存在虚火,但嘉宾们一致认为,中国整体的美食水准和优质餐馆数量其实在大幅增长,餐饮消费在宏观GDP中占据着极为显著的拉动作用。更重要的是,不必为真正的美味消亡而过分焦虑,因为“高手在民间”,最惊艳的食物往往藏在市井深巷或深山农家,而非高租金挤压下的大城市商场。

窦文涛分享了前两日在广州电视节期间专程跑到番禺觅食的经历。那是一条破旧街巷里的小摊,门口乌泱泱排了上百号人,从晚上十点苦等到午夜十二点半,只为了那一锅现杀现煮的猪杂粥。当晚新运来的新鲜猪大肠甚至还在神经反射般微微蠕动,场面极其血腥,但下锅煮出的鲜美程度堪称绝伦,令人叹服。

这种对“极鲜”的追求引发了中西饮食观念的对比: - **中式与西式的肉食哲学**:西方人偏好通过“熟成”(Aging)来展现对肉质风味的理解;中国人则追求“现宰现吃”的极致新鲜,这种即刻烹饪在某种程度上与日本料理的生食习惯有异曲同工之处。 - **关于杂碎的饮食伦理**:吃下水并非残酷,反而是最惜物、最勤俭的美德体现,物尽其用不浪费任何部位,这也是全球平民饮食文化的精髓所在。

席间还聊起汶川大地震时的一个惊心动魄的段子:有人前往四川青川运送救援物资,因道路中断在一家学校门口的小吃店吃冒肥肠,刚动一筷子便突发余震。众人惊慌奔逃,那人却因这口肥肠实在太香,心想“死也要做个饱死鬼”,硬是折返回去继续吃完。众人感慨,最顶级的风味往往不在繁华都市,例如在钱塘江源头的浙江开化县,半山腰上一家连菜单都不用看的小饭馆,随便炒两道土菜便鲜美异常;店主甚至直言,一旦搬去杭州开店,失去当地的水土食材,味道就彻底变了。

[46:17](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=2777s) 从“抢买单”到“算到分”:饭桌付账文化的代际与心态变迁

话题随后转向一则关于年轻女孩酒后抢着买单的新闻。几位昔日好友聚餐,其中一人在当地打工,另几人则是大学生。几杯酒下肚后,众人为了谁付钱争执不休。打工女孩执意要买单,而朋友们觉得她打工挣钱不易、执意要替她分担,但在酒精和自尊心的催化下,女孩可能觉得“难道我打工就没钱买单吗”,演变成一场夹杂着面子、尊严与微醺情绪的风波。

这一场景勾起了窦文涛对早年经历的回忆。当年他在深圳工作时,常常遇到饭局快结束时买单者“尿遁”失踪的尴尬。只要请客的人一不见,机灵的客人就会借故“家里有急事”溜之大吉,留下其他人面面相觑,生怕成为最后走不了的那个冤大头。

反观当下的年轻群体,请客文化正发生彻底的代际重构: - **八零后与九零后的AA制**:老一辈习惯由一人全包买单,甚至以此彰显地位或热情;而如今的年轻一代普遍崇尚AA制。 - **移动支付对人情边界的重塑**:从前上海人精细算账还得面对凑零钱的尴尬,如今借助微信支付,四个人聚餐连几毛几分的尾数都能均摊得清清楚楚、毫不拖泥带水。 - **老派商人的面子与兴衰**:嘉宾提到,在九十年代到千禧年代做生意风生水起的那批人,骨子里极度讲究面子,无论如何都必须抢着买单,别人抢单甚至会翻脸;这类人习惯天天呼朋引伴在外吃喝宴请,但随着时代变迁与个人运势起伏,不少昔日挥金如土的老板最终也遭遇了生意的滑铁卢。

[49:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=2949s) 年轻人的拼桌吐槽与“抢买单”的性别困境

席间谈起请客吃饭的心理微妙处:有人生意受损时,朋友好心天天请他吃饭,但他内心非但不开心,反而充满落寞,因为他心底渴望的是自己腰缠万贯、夜夜宴请大家的豪爽。而如今的“80后”与“90后”年轻一代,餐饮习惯已大不相同。老一辈人偏爱包房和大圆桌,现在的年轻人图省事流行吃套餐,更流行“拼桌”。在上海、广东等地尤为常见:一张长桌这头坐着三个男白领,那头坐着三四个女白领,中间没有隔板。两边一边吃一边吐槽各自公司的奇葩老板、通勤艰难或疯狂加班。起初各聊各的,后来听到对方也在倒苦水,两边便越聊越带劲、越讲越起劲,仿佛在隔空“对台戏”,通过这种奇特的拼桌氛围宣泄职场压力。

这种新型就餐社交让老一辈大呼不解,女嘉宾随之联想到自己年轻时的经历。她打趣问马未都怎么年轻时没早点遇上他,因为她当年也是那种习惯主动冲上前抢着买单的性格。结果一位男性朋友很严肃地告诫她:“我观察你很久了,如果你总这么抢着买单,你绝对嫁不出去!”在传统的观念里,大家一起吃饭,女人跳出来买单会让男人当场“挂不住脸”、大失男子气概。

[51:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=3087s) 从女权争议到相亲AA:当代男女账单的观念裂变

窦文涛指出,在大城市和西方社会,由男人理所当然买单的传统正在迅速瓦解。甚至有英国的女权学者提出激进观点,认为男人负责买单本质上是西欧封建与男权歧视的遗留,潜意识里将女性视为附庸与消费对象,甚至暗讽“你难道是个奴隶主吗?”然而在现实生活的大多数调查中,即便女性主义理念日益普及,许多女性潜意识里仍觉得约会时男人若不买单会让人感到不悦。

不过,如今年轻人的相亲模式早已大变。相亲吃完饭,若彼此没看对眼,回头微信立刻弹来一条转账要求:“今天花了500多,咱们一人一半吧。”两不相欠,利落收场。大家更感叹现在的年轻小伙越来越“宅”、越来越佛系被动,面对女孩常常懒得去追求;反倒是很多独立女性愈发大方主动。两相碰撞之下,传统那种男人打肿脸充胖子必须结账的规矩,正面临前所未有的代际拐点。

- **西方女权视角**:认为“男方买单”暗示了对女性的物化与主从关系,是男权社会的残余陋习。 - **现实相亲生态**:不再维系虚伪的客套,相亲无果后直接微信发送账单金额要求“AA制”平摊。 - **恋爱主动权反转**:年轻男性追求意愿下降、更显佛系,年轻独立女性在消费与社交中则更为主动、坦荡。

[53:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=3225s) 抢买单背后的面子博弈与八十年代的尴尬饭局

在中国的人情社会里,“抢买单”向来直接挂钩一个人的混头、社会地位与“面子”。席间讲起北京的一个经典场面:逢年过节一大家子聚餐,大舅、二舅、三舅为了抢着付账,在收银台前扭打撕扯成一团,三个舅妈在一旁急得直嚷嚷“赶紧把钱放下!”最后谁抢先把钱塞进收银台,亲戚邻里就会夸赞谁混得体面、事业有成。而在上海,讲究的则是“有言在先”,要么事前挑明谁做东,要么熟人之间心中有本明白账,这顿你请、下顿我来,绝不在台面上拉扯失态,人情往来却记得清清楚楚。

马未都澄清道,抢买单的风气其实是1990年代改革开放深入、大家手里有了闲钱才流行起来的;而在1980年代初,普通人普遍囊中羞涩,绝大多数人吃饭纯属“蹭饭”,一旦遇到结账危机便极其狼狈。马未都回忆起当年一位准备次日清晨飞赴日本留学的哥们,临行前一晚带着女友豪气地请大家吃全北京最贵的牛肉,摆了两三桌。那哥们蹬着尖头白皮鞋、穿着一条亮扎眼的黄裤子,风头无两。不料晚上十点结账时发现钱没带够,只得骑车回家取钱。满桌客人走也不是、留也不是,谁也没钱替他垫付,原本欢腾热烈的欢送宴瞬间陷入长达一个多小时的死寂与尴尬。直到十一点多主人取钱赶回结了账,大家才长舒一口气,但离别的热络气氛早已荡然无存,只能草草道别。

[56:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=3414s) 民国上海滩的荒诞恶作剧:叶仲芳“典当皮袍”请客记

聊到请客结账的极致荒唐事,嘉宾援引了老上海掌故书籍《春申旧闻》里记载的一则奇闻。清末民初“五金大王”叶澄衷之子叶仲芳,是上海滩出了名的顶级富二代。某年数九寒冬,叶仲芳在大西洋西菜社设宴款待一众富家公子好友。当时并无暖气空调,宾客们皆裹着厚重的华贵皮袍赴宴。叶仲芳却提前命人在包厢内生起数只炭火熊熊的旺炉,把整个屋子烘得如热气蒸腾的澡堂,自己更只穿一条夏日短裤在门口迎客。

待宾客进门,被热浪一逼,又连饮数杯下重姜温热的黄酒,纷纷大汗淋漓,不得不将身上昂贵的皮袍大衣脱下挂在门厅衣架上。酒过三巡,众人正喝得满头大汗之时,叶仲芳突然面露惨色走了进来,向众人拱手致歉:“各位对不起,兄弟今天手头实在没钱会账,已经把各位门外的皮大衣全送去当铺当了换饭钱!”说罢,他掏出一大把当票朝空中一扬,转身扬长而去。

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 叶仲芳宴请恶作剧流程 accDescr: 展现叶仲芳在极寒冬日设局、诱导脱衣、当掉皮袍到事后赔送新衣的完整过程。

subgraph S1["设局烘烤"] A["冬日大西洋餐厅宴请<br/>室内火炉烘如蒸笼"] --> B["宾客浑身燥热大汗<br/>脱下昂贵皮袍挂于门厅"] end

subgraph S2["当袍结账"] B --> C["叶仲芳声称囊中羞涩<br/>已将全场皮袍典当充抵饭钱"] C --> D["抛撒当票扬长而去<br/>众人仅着单衣瑟瑟打车"] end

subgraph S3["事后赔礼"] D --> E["一两日后仆人登门送礼"] E --> F["奉上定制全新皮袍<br/>尺寸严丝合缝彰显旧派阔少作风"] end ```

一众锦衣玉食的少爷们在寒冬腊月里只穿着单薄小衫,手里攥着当票,在刺骨寒风中瑟瑟发抖地叫黄包车,狼狈不堪,一路骂骂咧咧。然而不过一两日,叶仲芳便派出自家仆人,挑着精美礼盒逐一登门赔罪:“我家少爷特意给您订做了新的。”大家拆开一试,尺寸分毫不差、严丝合缝。这种先恶作剧把人整得啼笑皆非、随后又以极体面的方式替人挽回颜面的做派,正是昔日上海滩老派纨绔子弟独有的荒诞与讲究。

[59:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=3555s) 奇人旧事:扮乞丐的将军与八旗子弟的“隐富”怪癖

窦文涛与嘉宾们聊起旧时文人笔下的种种奇人逸事。席间提到一位行为乖张的旧时代人物,平素喜好恶作剧,甚至故意乔装打扮成乞丐流落街头,最终妻子与其离婚;后来日寇侵华,他毅然投身中国远征军,战死于缅甸丛林,一生充满荒诞与壮烈。这种“老派人的做派”引出了晚清小说家李伯元(《官场现形记》作者)笔下的一则笔记故事。

李伯元记载,晚清时期的上海四马路(现福州路)已是繁华时尚之地。当时有一位战功赫赫的清军将领,人称“大清赵子龙”或“白袍小将”。这位武将每次得了银饷来到上海,总爱换上一身破烂乞丐装,跪在四马路街头。当时四马路穿梭着全上海最时髦标致的摩登女子,这位将军如同当今在地铁口发传单一般,只要有年轻姑娘经过,便递上一张小纸条。多数人避之不及随手扔掉,唯有心善之人将纸条带回家中打开,才发现里面竟然包着一片价值不菲的金箔。这不仅是一场恶作剧,更像是一种用怪诞行径来试探人心的奇特游戏。

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: 清代奇人扮丐行为逻辑 accDescr: 展现晚清将领与八旗子弟乔装乞丐的荒诞行径与背后动机 subgraph S1["四马路将军奇遇"] A["白袍将军获饷银"] --> B["上海四马路乔装跪讨"] B --> C["向过路摩登女子递纸条"] C --> D["心善者拆看:内裹金箔"] end subgraph S2["北京八旗贵胄风尚"] E["八旗子弟隐秘癖好"] --> F["西郊街头扮丐乞讨"] F --> G["露出破绽:拇指翡翠扳指"] G --> H["豪车接驾/太监伺候换锦衣"] end ```

这种富贵之人扮作乞丐的做派在晚清并非孤例,老北京的八旗子弟中也曾风行一时。与当代“富二代买法拉利”的炫富心理截然相反,当时的旗人贵胄流行“藏富”,甚至以此为乐。有好事者曾蹲守在北京西郊观察三四个叫花子,仔细端详其破绽,赫然发现其中一名乞丐的大拇指上戴着一枚脱不下来的名贵翡翠扳指(用于骑射拉弓之物)。直到日落黄昏,两辆极其奢华的马车驶来,车上下来的太监亲自伺候这几位乞丐擦脸净手、换上绫罗绸缎,随后扬长而去。直到民国二十年代的上海,街头依然能见到这种怪癖。众嘉宾感叹,穷人装富固然不易,但养尊处优、满腹学养的富人若要真扮出底层的落魄与乞丐相,其难度更是非同小可。

[01:02:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=3760s) 饭局买单心理学与北京“神秘私房菜”的免单奇遇

话题由装穷扮富自然滑向了饭桌上最微妙的心理战场——买单。常言道“饭桌上人人平等,结账时各怀鬼胎”。窦文涛提到曾有餐馆老板专门培训服务员:进包厢结账时,眼神一定要死死锁定第一个开口喊“买单”的人。因为许多客人的抢单只是虚晃一枪,往往“喊得最响的那个恰恰不是真想掏钱的”。甚至有些顽皮的收银员在面对两人拉扯争抢信用卡时,会故意抽走那个装模作样者的卡,让场面顿时充满难堪的幽默。窦文涛笑言自己年轻时读《二十年目睹之怪现状》,曾发愿写一本《吃席目睹之怪现状》,专门记录历年碰上的各色离奇饭局。

马未都顺势分享了自己在北京亲历的一场荒诞饭局。当年一位香港朋友为了还人情,托马未都张罗一桌人去赴宴,凑齐六个人前往一处极其隐蔽、不对外开放的神秘宅院。进门后众人都愣住了:偌大的正厅里,六个人被安排在六张独立的桌椅上分席而坐,彼此相隔甚远,椅子高大得让人的两条腿只能悬空耷拉着,宛如幼儿园孩童坐大凳。这种布局导致大家说话全靠隔空喊叫,马未都当场表示“这没法吃,哪有这么还人情的”,随即要求换桌。即便换到大桌上,椅子依然巨大悬空。令人哭笑不得的是,宴罢结账时,店家老板出来一见是马未都,当即拱手尊称“马爷赏光”,不仅这一顿极其昂贵的大餐分文不取,全额免单,连香港朋友欠的人情账也没能按原计划还成。

- **结账抢单定律**:餐馆服务员受训秘籍在于锁定首位发声者,识破虚假客套,甚至故意刷破绽者的卡以作戏谑。 - **孤僻分席怪宴**:早年北京隐秘私房菜讲究高深排场,六人各据一案悬足而食,反倒成了交际折磨。 - **马未都的面子效应**:昂贵的人情债饭局因“马爷”身份被老板免单,使得请客还债的初衷戏剧性落空。

[01:05:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=3919s) 中国饭局的人格图谱与东西方AA制反差

众人深入剖析了北京流传的文化论断——“中国文化的终极密码全在饭局里”。20世纪90年代后期,国人家居装潢日益考究,客厅虽然气派,但反而极少在家里招待宾客,人际社交全面转向餐馆饭局。饭局不仅是维系关系的终极形态,更像是一座城市最生动的情报站与微缩舞台;每个人赴宴前都在腹中打草稿、备段子,就等席间一展身手。

围坐圆桌的就餐形式催生出了一套自然演化的角色分工: 1. **主讲核心(控场者)**:席间总有一位宛如“水瓶座”特质的话匣子,整晚高谈阔论、输出奇闻轶事,全场视线皆为其牵引; 2. **捧哏接茬者**:适时呼应主讲者的节奏,负责烘托气氛、抛梗接梗; 3. **后勤统筹人**:充当“秘书长”角色,负责联络点菜、照看服务与协调细节。

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 饭局角色分工与文化差异 accDescr: 解析中式圆桌饭局的角色生态与东西方分账逻辑的根本差异 subgraph 中式圆桌生态 R1["主控核心<br>(高谈阔论/讲故事)"] --- R2["捧哏接茬<br>(活跃气氛/垫台词)"] R2 --- R3["协调统筹<br>(负责局务/点单张罗)"] end subgraph 文化分账逻辑 C1["中式合餐制"] -->|"情感交融、难分彼此"| S1["抢单请客为主/AA极显尴尬"] C2["西式分餐制"] -->|"份量明确、权责清晰"| S2["各付己账/AA制有合理土壤"] end ```

这种中式合餐文化与西方社会的AA制形成了鲜明对比。窦文涛聊起网络上的一个约会段子:年轻男女网络奔现,男生提议合点一个汉堡,汉堡切开后男生毫不客气地挑走大半块,结账时却坚决要求AA平摊。这个笑话折射出文化机制的深层冲突——西方的“Go Dutch”(各付各账)建立在分餐制、一人一份的明晰产权上;而中国传统的合餐制度让饭菜混杂一体,极难精确厘清各自消费。针对“外国人是否真会把账单平摊到分角不差”的提问,嘉宾指出这依然因人而异,并不能完全一概而论。

[01:08:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=4101s) 中西文化中的“面子”与人情往来

讨论从东西方买单与社交文化的差异切入。嘉宾提到自己在英国与几位关系亲密的昔日同窗聚会,逛完博物馆后一起喝咖啡。账单金额其实很小,一杯咖啡不过几英镑。结账时,一位朋友问“你能报销吗?”,嘉宾回答不能,并顺手刷卡把账单全结了,免去大家掏信用卡AA分摊的繁琐。然而同行的另一位女生对此表现出极大的震惊和感激,再三连声道谢,其感激的程度隆重得仿佛被请了一顿山珍海味。嘉宾不禁感慨,在西方人看来几英镑的请客完全不用上升到如此高度,而在中国人眼里,这种客气与请客往往深度绑定了“面子”。

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 面子观念的跨文化差异对比 accDescr: 对比西方、日本与中国文化在人情、买单与送礼机制上的核心差异。 subgraph Western["西方视角"] W1["账单 AA 制为常态"] --> W2["面子 = 单纯的尊重 (Respect)"] W2 --> W3["小额请客引发超预期感激"] end subgraph EastAsian["东亚视角"] J1["日本文化:不给人添麻烦"] --> J2["偏好赠送精致小礼物避免心理负担"] C1["中国文化:面子与光彩"] --> C2["不仅要面子还要'光'(外在可见)"] C2 --> C3["人情往来讲究加码回赠 (300元还更多)"] end ```

嘉宾们进一步剖析了“面子”的文化内涵。英文虽已收录“save face”这一直译词汇,但老外眼中的面子更接近纯粹的“尊重(respect)”,只要给足尊重即可;而中国文化中的面子层次极其丰富复杂,甚至不仅要有面子,还得有“光”——也就是要把体面亮出来给所有人看见。此外,人情往来中还存在一种不对等的“平衡心理”:别人送了300元的礼物或请了一顿300元的饭,自己回礼时总觉得必须加码多还一点。对比之下,日本文化强调“不给人添麻烦”,往往倾向于互赠极小巧的礼物,以避免让对方背负心理压力;而中式宴客往往追求“摆满一整桌”,用排场和丰盛程度让所有宾客感到震撼与叹为观止。

[01:10:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=4224s) 北京老楼里的“流水席”传奇

马未都分享了一段早年在北京亲历的奇特宴饮奇观。当时有些人极度热衷于在家里设宴招待各路宾朋,将其作为核心的社交方式。北京有一处极富盛名的私宅流水席,设在一栋老公房(宿舍楼)里。房主买下两套大户型并将墙壁彻底打通,甚至把厨房扩建成配备三四名专业大厨的商用级别后厨。屋里摆满了各式各样拼凑在一起的桌子,大桌套小桌,整天按“流水线”模式不间断翻台。

马未都因为与房主交情颇深,在盛情难却之下前去赴宴。他原以为是一场三五知己促膝长谈的清静聚会,到场后才发现屋里源源不断地涌入素不相识的陌生人。随着客人越聚越多,主人不断往桌边添椅子,甚至挤到两个人必须共享一条板凳。原本只能坐十个人的圆桌,硬生生塞下了二十副碗筷。马未都调侃自己那顿饭从头到尾只能“斜着身子吃”,不管左撇子还是右撇子,如果不侧过身去根本连手都伸不开。厨房里如车间流水线一般不停走菜,一拨人吃完离席,下一拨人立刻无缝衔接落座继续吃。

- **堆积如山的啤酒箱**:宿舍楼楼道里整箱24瓶装的啤酒垒得比正规餐馆的库房还要高。 - **全免费与门客风范**:所有登门食客一概不用付钱,全由主人自掏腰包一力承担,宛如古代豪门豢养三千门客的“孟尝君”派头。 - **24小时不停歇**:无论客人几点踏入家门,桌上永远有人在吃,随时都有热菜端出。

[01:12:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=4368s) 詹宏志之妻王宣一的深夜厨房与待客之道

窦文涛指出,这种家里全天候有热饭、随时接纳朋友落脚的现象并非北方独有。他提到了台湾著名文化人詹宏志及其亡妻王宣一的动人往事。在台湾新电影浪潮初期,罗大佑、杨德昌等人都在艰苦拍电影,大家都没有正规公司,唯独詹宏志开办了公司,于是这群艺术家常常半夜三更登门求助或聚会。

哪怕是凌晨三四点有人敲门,詹宏志还在床上未起,他的妻子王宣一便已翻身下床开门,脱口而出的第一句话永远是亲切温厚的:“你吃过了没有?”随后她便立刻走进厨房开火做饭。王宣一本身是台湾著名的美食家,厨艺精湛绝伦。在她因病突逝后,詹宏志曾先后在上海、杭州等地专门设宴重现爱妻的传世菜谱,以此寄托深切的哀思。嘉宾们由衷感叹,这样无需专职厨师、凡事全由女主人亲力亲为且甘之如饴的家庭,在当今社会当真“打着灯笼都找不着”。

[01:14:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=4477s) 饮食背后的文化烙印与极致社交人格

周轶君补充道,中东地区的宴客礼仪在“面子”和繁文缛节上甚至更为惊人。如果受邀去中东人家里做客,客人必须大清早便登门,哪怕彼此面面相觑无话可聊、只能干坐着一起看电视,也必须耗上一整天。因为在当地观念中,单纯吃一顿饭算不上最高规格的尊重,唯有为主人“奉献出整天的时间”才代表深厚的情谊。饭后告辞更是讲究,客人至少得客套辞行三次,主人则反复坚决挽留,推拉数次之后方能成行。

随后话题转回中国本土的饮食情结。中国人见面第一句问候永远是“吃了吗”,对食物的执念深刻烙印在民族记忆中。尤其回想起上世纪70年代的凭票配给时期,许多普通家庭必须省吃俭用积攒数月的粮票肉票,才能凑齐一顿像样体面的年夜饭。最后,大家聚焦于那些天生热衷操办流水席的“神仙宿主”:

- **无穷的社交精力**:不论是杭州的文化名流,还是穿梭于京沪文艺圈的核心人物,他们的宅邸永远高朋满座,充当着整个城市不同圈层的文化客厅与枢纽。 - **折磨与享受的界线**:对于生性内向的“宅男”而言,整日家中宾客盈门简直是让人精神崩溃的精神折磨;但对这类天生的社交家来说,在人来人往的杯觥交错中,他们获得了无与伦比的心理满足与快感。

[01:16:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=4592s) 名人流水席:从安迪·沃霍尔的工厂到杰克·伦敦的“狼舍”

窦文涛与嘉宾们探讨起名流社交中那种宾客络绎不绝、甚至完全失控的“流水席”现象。当一个人名声大噪时,登门拜访的人一拨接一拨,起初主人还会引见介绍,到后来满屋子全是互不相识的陌生人,主人索性连介绍都省了,大家吃饱喝足散伙,各自欢喜。

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: 流水席文化与社交场域演变 accDescr: 从西方艺术名流聚会到中国乡土与都市礼俗的变化路径 subgraph Western ["西方名人场域"] A["安迪·沃霍尔<br/>Loft 工厂 / 边缘群体聚会"] B["杰克·伦敦<br/>狼舍 Wolf House / 文人雅集"] end subgraph Traditional ["中国传统乡土"] C["乡村白事流水席<br/>大办三日 / 越远越敬"] end subgraph Urban ["现代都市纠结"] D["上海婚宴人情账<br/>礼金规矩 / 面子与 Social Code"] end A -.-> C B -.-> C C --> D ```

这种场景让人联想到西方文艺界的名人聚会: - **安迪·沃霍尔(Andy Warhol)的纽约 Loft“工厂”**:如今画作动辄拍卖数亿美元的沃霍尔,当年在纽约的 Loft 成了各色人等的避难所与狂欢地。街头流浪汉、精神障碍者、边缘混混都跑来蹭吃蹭喝。沃霍尔顺势架起机器拍摄他们,虽被后人质疑是在剥削弱势群体,但他全不在意,整日记录这些光怪陆离的社会众生,直至后来发生街头女子朝他开枪射击、致其身受重伤的极端恶性事件。 - **杰克·伦敦(Jack London)的“狼舍”(Wolf House)**:这位美国著名作家发迹后热衷于宏大工程,斥巨资在加州建造巨大的“狼舍”庄园,将全国各地所有会写字、能舞文弄墨的人全召集过来,不论相识与否,大宴宾客,极尽风光。然而这座宏伟庄园最终在一场大火中化为灰烬。

---

[01:18:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=4701s) 乡土白事流水席:死者为大与远客之尊

谈及流水席传统的留存,嘉宾们指出,这种形式如今在都市里几乎绝迹,唯独在广大乡村的丧葬文化中完整保留了下来。乡村社会有着极强的“重死轻生”观念: - **白事大办三日**:红事(婚礼)往往只吃一顿便宣告结束,且从不办流水席;但村里老人离世,按规矩通常要连办三天酒席。家境殷实的大户人家更是从早到晚流水开席,任由宾客甚至邻近村民随意吃喝。 - **“越远越尊”的待客逻辑**:丧宴讲究排场与面子,不论来者的具体社会地位高低,只要客人是从几十里外远道而来奔丧的,在东家眼里就是最高规格的上宾。 - **殡葬演艺与喧闹场面**:现代乡村葬礼还融入了极为喧闹的演艺活动,从传统的鼓乐班子到戏曲表演、民间歌舞,音响开得震天响,成了方圆几十里乡村公共交往的独特仪式。

---

[01:19:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=4758s) 上海婚宴与人情债:千元红包、记账簿与“Social Code”

话题随即转到当代都市——尤其是上海的婚宴开销与人情往来。对于婚礼办下来到底是“赚”还是“赔”,大家感叹这里面有一套极其沉重而严密的社交密码(Social Code):

- **起步千元的红包潜规则**:相比于广东地区人情红包普遍“点到即止”的轻便做法,上海的婚宴礼金起步价往往至少一千元,甚至更多,否则连酒店单人餐标的成本都覆盖不了。这背后存在代际叠加的通胀机制——三年前你送我一千,三年后我回礼就必须加码添头。 - **丈母娘的“人情账本”**:许多经历过五六十年代艰苦岁月的上海老一辈家中备有专门的“人情记账簿”。婚礼散场后,精疲力竭的新婚夫妇接到的第一道指令往往是丈母娘催促:“今晚睡前先把红包数清楚、账记好”,以便理清以往的人情亏欠与未来的还礼底账。 - **实用主义与死要面子的矛盾**:上海人素以精明、务实著称,但在婚俗人情上却深陷繁文缛节。从钻戒必须按“一克拉”的既定标准攀比(邻居阿姨甚至会挑剔“八十一分还是太小”),到外滩草坪上千篇一律身穿白纱拍照的准新娘,无不体现出一种被群体目光支配的焦虑。年轻一代哪怕想打破常规旅行结婚,背地里依然容易招致长辈“连酒席都不办”的非议。

---

[01:24:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=5085s) 乱世旧影:从女流氓佘爱珍谈起

在谈完当代社会人们对规矩、面子与标签的执念后,嘉宾将话题切入旧上海的江湖往事。世人对于历史人物往往容易贴上非黑即白的扁平标签,比如汪伪政权特务头子吴四宝的妻子——佘爱珍。在老上海话里,她被称为“白相人嫂”(女流氓),行事凶悍,甚至据传枪法极准,是上海滩赫赫有名的狠角色。通过这类充满传奇色彩的历史人物,桌上进而开启了对人性的复杂性以及宴席江湖背后更深层历史细节的探寻。

[01:25:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=5113s) 孤岛时期的刺杀风云与“看脸”换命

席间谈起民国汪伪政权“76号”魔窟的狠角色。金宇澄提到当年76号里有个保镖出身、后来被日本人毒死的人物叫吴四宝,其妻子佘爱珍百步穿杨、枪法极其了得。抗战孤岛时期,汪伪特工总部“76号”与国民党中统、军统暗战极为惨烈,尤其在金融银行系统,双方剑拔弩张,“今天杀你一个,明天你必杀我一个”。

暗杀往往挑在酒席宴会上下手。金宇澄绘声绘色地讲了一桩逸事:一次行动前,杀手已就位,身处包间外的佘爱珍仍放心不下,执意要亲自挑帘看一眼目标。手下撩开布帘,低声指认正对包厢门就座、位居正中的男子就是银行副经理,待会儿一开门就要将其击毙。佘爱珍打量了一番,突然语出惊人:“这个人长得太帅了,杀掉可惜了,换旁边那个长胡子的老头吧,杀这个。”结果刺客按令行事,进门拔枪将旁边那位倒霉的长胡子麻子脸一枪打死。窦文涛与众人听罢大笑,感叹佘爱珍杀人如麻之余竟然还是个“颜控”,长相竟能直接决定生死。

[01:27:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=5232s) 上海滩的“卖相”、“老克勒”与白相人

由这桩看脸脱险的奇闻,窦文涛引申出上海人对“卖相”二字的执着。他调侃自己年轻时想找上海女朋友,无奈对方嫌他“卖相”不够好。窦文涛转而向金宇澄求证,称外界常把金宇澄形容为标准的“老克勒”(Old Clerk / Classic),但金宇澄坦言自己并不喜欢这个被泛化的词,如今它几乎被滥用成了所有上海老派爷叔的代名词。

众人进而拆解起一系列老上海的世俗切口: - **小开**:富商巨贾的公子哥儿,最大的特点是往往游手好闲、不务正业,家里生意一概甩手不管。 - **白相**:游玩、消遣,引申为不上班、专职玩乐的“白相人”。 - **卖相**:人的外形仪态与精气神,哪怕出门“白相”,也必须打扮周正、卖相十足。

金宇澄提及他的长篇小说《繁花》卷首特意致敬了王家卫电影《阿飞正传》的最后一幕:梁朝伟在局促低矮的阁楼里,不慌不忙地梳齐头发,数妥两叠钞票,穿戴得一丝不苟方才出门。金宇澄感慨,那短短半分钟精准提炼了老上海的骨髓与魂魄。过去提篮桥、曹河泾、十六铺等码头市井区域自然形成了一个个独特的生态小中心,即便到了夜半三更,也有大批过着旧式民国作息的人白天睡觉、夜里出来打牌。这些老派人哪怕日子过得捉襟见肘,坐在街边吃块饼干、喝杯咖啡也要讲究个调调,这种做派全是昔日都市遗风的漫长积淀。

[01:30:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=5400s) 马未都六十万截胡黄花梨大床

马未都由此分享了自己在上海古玩江湖中与市井商人过招的切身体验。他指出上海人与北京人做生意的路数截然不同:上海人精于试探深浅,退进自如,极懂利益盘算。

当年马未都在上海看中了一张极为罕见的明清黄花梨大床,心仪不已。床的主人不是古董行家,而是开澡堂子的老板,平时赚了钱就靠一帮弟兄四处搜罗老物件。按马未都当时的心里估价,这床至多值八十万,但在古玩行里真想夺爱就得下猛料。他咬牙开出一百二十万的天价,老板却一口回绝,甚至连人带话给顶了回来,声称这床一辈子都不卖。

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 马未都黄花梨大床交易波折 accDescr: 展示马未都从最初求购被拒到两年后利用心理战折价拿下的完整博弈过程

subgraph Phase1["初次交锋:志在必得"] A["看中黄花梨大床<br/>心理估值:80万"] --> B["豪掷溢价 120万 求购"] B --> C["澡堂老板断然拒绝<br/>'一辈子都不卖'"] end

subgraph Phase2["转机出现:对方生变"] C -.->|"相隔两年"| D["知情人通风报信:<br/>老板妻子生子急需用钱"] end

subgraph Phase3["二次博弈:闪电战拿下"] D --> E["马未都主动致电<br/>祭出心理博弈打压策略"] E --> F["一口价 59万(60万减1万)<br/>'不许还价,一分钟到账'"] F --> G["老板毫不犹豫答应<br/>次日火速派人提货防悔约"] end ```

事情悬了整整两年,马未都突然接到眼线通风报信,称澡堂老板的老婆生孩子急用钱,打算出手大床。马未都主动致电试探,老辣地玩了一招心理战。他故意反向压价:“以前我追着你给一百二十万你都不卖,还请你吃饭,今天我如果出六十万,你还要还价吗?不还价就给你减一万算五十九万,同意的话一分钟内钱到账。”对方竟然毫不迟疑一口答应,痛快得让马未都始料未及。生怕对方反悔或一物二卖,身在北京的马未都当夜打款,次日一早便指令上海的手下推掉所有杂事,第一时间把床运走装车。

[01:32:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=5569s) 衣着背后的市井尊严与阶层密码

从古玩交易的精明,大家进一步聊到上海人根深蒂固的“面子”与生活体面。在过去物资极度匮乏的年代,普通市民就算没有钱,也会千方百计维持体面。金宇澄回忆小时候邻居家即便贫困,女裁缝也会四处翻看旧杂志上的西洋画报样式,淘来廉价下脚布料照猫画虎,裁剪缝制成合身时髦的外套,走出门时依旧笔挺体面。

金宇澄还援引作家柯灵写上海澡堂的生动细节:客人进门更衣,跑堂伙计接过大衣往衣架上一挂,就在顺手抖开衣服的一刹那,眼角余光便已暗暗扫过了衣领内侧的裁缝商标。只凭这一眼商标出处,伙计心底便能把客人的身家背景、阶层来历掂量得一清二楚。这种不动声色的打量与入微的观察,正是老上海市井人情中极为精妙的一景。

[01:33:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=5636s) The Underground Heritage and Observing the World

Following a discussion about how attentive people were to customer service and social nuances in an earlier era, the host segues into an unexpected personal connection regarding Jin Yucheng's background. Mentioning that he recently learned Jin Yucheng's father was an underground Communist Party operative during the revolutionary period, the host points out that Jin Yucheng seems to carry a clear trace of his father's shadow. Just like an intelligence operative embedded in the field, Jin Yucheng spends his days gathering detailed observations, quietly collecting information, and intently studying all manner of people from everyday life—an instinctual vigilance and curiosity that deeply informs his storytelling and literary writing. Wrapping up the gathering, the host warmly thanks "Professor Jin" for offering such an engaging collection of memories, insights, and human stories.

- **Underground Operative Legacy**: Jin Yucheng's father was an underground Party operative in Shanghai, a background of covert observation and situational awareness that humorously parallels Jin's own habit of constantly observing people and gathering life details. - **Observational Method**: Jin's sharp eye for human behavior, social strata, and everyday habits is framed as an inherited talent for collecting intelligence on the human condition. - **Closing Tribute**: The host expresses appreciation for Jin Yucheng's presence and the vivid, textured anecdotes he brought to the table throughout the conversation.

## Notable quotes > [01:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=68s) 老男人饭局 — 窦文涛

> [19:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=1190s) 在有些地方,人与人之间是有壁垒的,不是所有人都能同坐一张桌子。

> [25:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=1505s) 三代才出一个真正的美食家

> [34:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=2053s) 如果第一名给中国,光看他们雕大凤凰的工夫就够了,我们干脆从第二名开始评吧。 — 窦文涛

> [34:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=2053s) 窦爷里面请

> [36:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=2216s) 你直接下楼往前走,看到第二家馆子就进去吃。 — 金宇澄

> [42:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=2542s) 死也要做个饱死鬼

> [49:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=2949s) 我观察你很久了,如果你总这么抢着买单,你绝对嫁不出去!

> [56:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=3414s) 各位对不起,兄弟今天手头实在没钱会账,已经把各位门外的皮大衣全送去当铺当了换饭钱! — 叶仲芳

> [01:02:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=3760s) 喊得最响的那个恰恰不是真想掏钱的 — 窦文涛

> [01:12:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=4368s) 你吃过了没有? — 王宣一

> [01:25:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=5113s) 这个人长得太帅了,杀掉可惜了,换旁边那个长胡子的老头吧,杀这个。 — 佘爱珍

> [01:30:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM&t=5400s) 以前我追着你给一百二十万你都不卖,还请你吃饭,今天我如果出六十万,你还要还价吗?不还价就给你减一万算五十九万,同意的话一分钟内钱到账。 — 马未都

## Mentioned 圆桌派, 窦文涛, 沈从文, 侯孝贤, 陈晓卿, 梁文道, 王小峰, 老男人饭局, 罗永浩, 张立宪(老六), 三联生活周刊, 吉野家, 蒋方舟, 大众点评, 蔡澜, 全勇先, 悬崖, 金宇澄, 葛剑雄, 马未都, 春申旧闻, 叶澄衷, 叶仲芳, 大西洋西菜社, 李伯元, 官场现形记, 二十年目睹之怪现状, 詹宏志, 王宣一, 罗大佑, 杨德昌, 周轶君, 安迪·沃霍尔 (Andy Warhol), 杰克·伦敦 (Jack London), 76号, 吴四宝, 佘爱珍, 阿飞正传, 梁朝伟, 繁花, 柯灵

## Video description 💡订阅我们,换个视角看懂万象: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwiWVn-hZq3_zuOk570kyGA

简介:《圆桌派》节目以圆桌为名,旨在体现圆桌席上人人平等,每期由窦文涛携手三位嘉宾,还原在生活中发生在圆桌旁、海阔天空的精彩聊天。延续真实不“装”的窦式主持风格,立足网络,放眼世间,神侃包罗万象的话题,嬉笑言谈中彼此迸发出智慧火花。 《锵锵行天下》第三季江南烟雨,一路如一副徐徐铺开的画卷。访名山,赏奇石,寻妙缘。窦文涛与老友们浸润在江南的诗情画意中。数十天的路程,在十三集的正片中难以完整展现,有太多的行程与内容难以取舍,所以借由本次《锵锵拾遗》,再次将未播出的素材进行汇编拾遗,将此次江南之行的更多精彩内容奉献给观众,让观众重温江南烟雨中的谈笑风生。 主持人:窦文涛 嘉宾:陈坤 / 周迅 / 蒋方舟 / 王晶 / 梁文道 / 马家辉 / 周轶君 / 武志红 / 马未都 / 张亚东 / 严歌苓 / 汪海林 / 金宇澄 / 李玫瑾

#中国未来 #中国社会 #植物 #生态 #大自然 #经济 #推荐 #热门 #经济 #圆桌派 #纪实 #时间 #历史 #文化 #聊天 #新闻 #心理健康 #中美关系 #科技 #经济 #金融 #香港 #台湾 #hongkong #taiwan #民生 #纪实 #纪录片 #窦文涛 #周轶君 #马未都 #许子东 #尹烨 #圆桌派第七季 #圆桌派 #中国经济 #中国内卷 #中国危机 #地方债 #新能源车 #光伏 #经济危机 #中国房地产 #中美竞争 #科技创新 #制度决定一切 #民营经济 #企业家精神 #AI时代

[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYZLQx0K2PM)

中文简报

马未都陈晓卿剖析中国饭局潜规则 称挑剔舌头方能倒逼顶级烹饪 顶级饮食审美与餐饮品质依赖数代人的品味积淀与严苛食客,缺乏鉴赏基准的盲从消费必然导致资本炒作劣币驱逐良币。 节目围绕中国人的饮食习惯、饭局社交与人情账目展开了深度漫谈。窦文涛与嘉宾们从土匪以“吃鱼挑部位”识别人质阶层的江湖规矩讲起,延伸到南北饮食风味差异、米其林精致餐饮与中式合餐的文化断层,以及现代网红餐饮背后的虚火。众人进而剖析了中式饭局中敬酒、抢买单、AA制背后的面子博弈与代际观念变迁,并结合老上海掌故、民国逸闻与古玩交易,层层揭示出中国人借由餐桌折射出的人情潜规则、生存智慧与市井尊严。 餐桌细节常折射阶层与生活经验,湘西土匪曾借饥饿儿童吃鱼时挑背肉、鱼腩或鱼鳃月牙肉的习惯,来精准推测人质家境并决定赎金多寡。 (0:00) 中西饮食文化在就餐节奏与体验心态上存在深刻鸿沟:西方视米其林等顶级正餐如听古典乐般专注菜品层次,而传统中式宴席重在社交应酬与推杯换盏,食物常沦为背景。 (27:44) 买单文化呈现出鲜明的代际与地域断层,从老派商人和北京人抢单彰显面子,转向当代年轻群体借助移动支付普及AA制与相亲平摊账单。 (46:17) 餐饮界存在商业化扩张与品质坚守的矛盾,风口炒作容易导致劣币驱逐良币,而真正的极致鲜味与匠心往往隐匿于民间市井而非高成本商业街区。 (39:30)

Reading summary

窦文涛与陈晓卿、马未都、金宇澄等文化嘉宾围绕餐桌文化展开探讨,认为饭局不仅关乎口腹之欲,更是折射阶层密码、人际博弈、地域心理以及时代变迁的微缩社会舞台。 筷尖下的阶层密码与挑剔审美 (0:00) 节目通过沈从文笔下的湘西土匪旧闻展开观察:土匪绑架幼童后先饿其三天再供一整条鱼,吃鱼背大块肉者视为贫家子弟当即释放;挑鱼腹肥嫩处者定为殷实之家索取平价赎金;若第一筷直奔鳃后极嫩的“月牙肉”或鱼头,则坐实其为豪门娇子,土匪必敲骨吸髓索要天价赎金。极微小的下箸习惯便能瞬间显露出家庭出身与娇惯程度。 由此延伸至当下餐饮,嘉宾指出“好厨子是被挑剔的舌头逼出来的”,所谓“三代才出一个美食家”。与北方食客随遇而安相比,岭南食客如广州人对餐馆百般挑剔、坚决否决平庸菜肴的“幸福烦恼”,恰恰培育了高水准的饮食沃土。然而中国普遍解决温饱不足四十年,大众对食材精细维度的审美仍在建立,盲目食用缺乏烹饪基准与肌肉纤维把控经验的野生动物,反倒反映出审美基准的缺失。 中西饮食心境与南北社交壁垒 (11:28) 中西顶尖餐饮体验存在深层断层。高净值中国游客赴欧米其林三星朝圣常以痛苦收场:西方与日本高级料理要求食客如听古典乐般专注配合道道相续的出菜节奏,而习惯凉热满桌、自由谈笑的中国食客则视四五个小时的漫长仪式为折磨。更有国内企业家将昂贵单麦威士忌当普通酒牛饮,或对米其林名厨缺乏职业尊重,显露出“醉翁之意不在酒”的社交虚耗。 在地域社交维度,南北差异尤为鲜明。深圳与江南讲究就事论事与实际契约;而北京饭局盘根错节、人际禁忌丛生,甚至曾发生组局者误将某男士三位前女友与现任请至同一桌而导致全场崩溃的极端尴尬。饭局上演变为“局长(主宾)”、“局托(活跃气氛)”、“局补(化解尴尬)”与“局奴(买单侠)”的隐秘权力结构,求人办事往往拖到服务员拿账单的最后一刻才顺带提出,充斥着繁复的社交内耗。 从抢买单到AA制:面子文化的代际裂变 (46:17) 饭桌买单是观察人情社会演变的重要窗口。上世纪八十年代物资匮乏,聚餐常沦为蹭饭,一人结账卡壳便导致全场死寂;到了九十年代富裕后,抢买单成为衡量混头、地位与“面子”的核心指标,老派商人常在吧台前扭打争抢。服务员甚至被专门训练锁定首位喊结账者,以识破虚假客套。历史上亦有上海富二代叶仲芳设局当掉宾客皮袍会账、次日奉上全新定制大衣挽回体面的荒诞逸事,皆将面子推向极致。 伴随移动支付普及与观念更迭,八零后与九零后掀起了去中心化的餐饮变革。年轻人崇尚拼桌向陌生人吐槽职场,相亲无果后直接微信转账平摊到分角,彻底告别打肿脸充胖子的客套。西方女权视角对“男方必须买单”提出质疑,年轻一代在消费中权责更清晰,传统的人情账簿机制正在都市青年中逐渐松绑。 流水席的待客温情与市井烟火 (70:24) 尽管商业饭局日渐异化、部分餐饮陷入过度营销与资本运作的浮躁,但民间对于真味与人情仍保有温存。如马未都亲历的北京老楼内全免费打通大户型的流水席,以及詹宏志之妻王宣一深夜面对投奔友人永远温厚相待并下厨做饭的待客之道,展示出传统门客文化与文人温情。在广大乡土社会,白事连办三天的流水席依然践行着“死者为大”与“远客之尊”的乡土伦理。 商业餐饮虽有粗制滥造之忧,但极致的人间至味依然隐于市井深巷。无论是广州街头午夜现杀现煮的猪杂粥,还是浙西半山腰小馆极度依赖当地水土的质朴土菜,都印证了平民食客物尽其用的饮食智慧。这种对鲜活与生活的真诚感知,远胜于饭局政治中雕龙画凤的形式主义。 无论是旧时代通过吃鱼辨家底、跑堂凭大衣商标识阶层,还是当代围绕买单与排场的代际碰撞,中国饭局的内涵始终超越食物本身。在浮华排场与社交规则的层层包裹下,如何摆脱虚伪内耗并重归对食物与人情本身的感知,成为当代人持续面对的命题。

Source quotes

[1:08] 窦文涛: 老男人饭局 [19:50] 在有些地方,人与人之间是有壁垒的,不是所有人都能同坐一张桌子。 [25:05] 三代才出一个真正的美食家 [34:13] 窦文涛: 如果第一名给中国,光看他们雕大凤凰的工夫就够了,我们干脆从第二名开始评吧。 [34:13] 窦爷里面请 [36:56] 金宇澄: 你直接下楼往前走,看到第二家馆子就进去吃。 [42:22] 死也要做个饱死鬼 [49:09] 我观察你很久了,如果你总这么抢着买单,你绝对嫁不出去! [56:54] 叶仲芳: 各位对不起,兄弟今天手头实在没钱会账,已经把各位门外的皮大衣全送去当铺当了换饭钱! [62:40] 窦文涛: 喊得最响的那个恰恰不是真想掏钱的 [72:48] 王宣一: 你吃过了没有? [85:13] 佘爱珍: 这个人长得太帅了,杀掉可惜了,换旁边那个长胡子的老头吧,杀这个。 [90:00] 马未都: 以前我追着你给一百二十万你都不卖,还请你吃饭,今天我如果出六十万,你还要还价吗?不还价就给你减一万算五十九万,同意的话一分钟内钱到账。

Original transcript

[0:00] But dining out is the best way to see [0:02] someone's true character, like the [0:04] speed at which they use their [0:06] chopsticks. [0:08] >> How long they look at the dishes is a [0:11] test of their character. [0:13] >> If they look, if they take a long time, [0:16] what does that mean? [0:17] >> It means this person is definitely very [0:20] picky. [0:20] >> Oh, I see. [0:22] >> He looks at which piece it is. [0:24] >> Which is the leg, which part is the tip [0:26] . [0:26] >> Right, right. Shen Wen used to be a [0:30] bandit, and he would say this about [0:32] eating fish. [0:33] >> Hmm. [0:34] >> When they kidnapped a child. [0:36] >> Hmm. [0:37] >> They'd starve them for three days. [0:38] >> Hmm. [0:39] >> Then they'd cook a fish for them. If [0:42] they ate the big chunks of meat, they [0:44] were poor kids, so they'd let them go. [0:46] >> Hmm. [0:47] >> If they went straight for the belly. [0:50] >> Hmm. [0:50] >> They’d keep them for a few more days. [0:52] >> Hmm. [0:53] >> If they went straight for the cheek [0:55] meat. The first bite is that [0:57] crescent-shaped meat, yes. [0:59] >> His family wouldn't be able to leave [1:01] without going bankrupt, because he was [1:03] the most favored one in the family. [1:05] >> Hmm, I see. [1:06] >> You have to say he’s sharp. [1:08] >> We actually entrusted Master Xiaoqing [1:11] with this before, we had a dinner, I [1:13] remember it was when Hou Hsiao-hsien [1:15] came. [1:15] >> Hmm. We said Hou Hsiao-hsien is coming, [1:19] we have to treat him well, but we [1:21] didn't want to go anywhere else, just [1:23] on our comfortable company balcony. Who [1:26] knew Master Xiaoqing would invite a [1:28] master chef to come over. [1:29] >> International level, it was truly, [1:31] truly impressive. [1:32] >> So you see, being able to make friends [1:34] like this, right? This life is just too [1:36] good. [1:37] >> Did he bring the ingredients himself? [1:39] >> Uh, no, he prepared them, he... [1:41] >> He showed me the menu two days in [1:43] advance. Yes. [1:45] >> Wow, so... [1:47] >> So, so, so today we have to treat him [1:50] well, but we are also taking advantage, [1:52] right? Originally, I said Master [1:55] Xiaoqing, [1:56] >> bring something to eat, but Master [1:58] Xiaoqing was in a rush and said, "Can [2:00] you get me a bottle of sake?" [2:02] >> I brought you a bottle of wine. [2:05] >> And now, Wendao is doing his own thing; [2:07] this literary youth can't make a living [2:09] , so he started selling wine, and after [2:11] selling wine, he'll sell snacks. [2:13] >> Pour it, pour the red wine for Wendao, [2:17] yes. [2:17] >> You pour for everyone, come on, Wendao. [2:20] >> Let’s, I’ll pour you the sake. [2:23] I’ll pour you the sake. Today we have [2:25] two kinds of wine, we’ll mix them, is [2:27] that okay? [2:28] >> I have no problem with that. [2:29] >> Yes, our goal is to get you drunk. [2:31] >> You won't get me drunk. Get someone [2:34] else. Oh my, I have heard that Master [2:37] Xiaoqing is extremely famous in the [2:40] Beijing dining scene. Wang Xiaofeng [2:43] from Sanlian Life Weekly mentioned that [2:46] we used to have this "Old Men's Dinner [2:48] Club," with people like Luo Yonghao and [2:50] Lao Liu (Zhang Lixian). He said that [2:54] ever since Chen Xiaoqing joined our [2:56] dinners, the quality of the food has [2:59] improved significantly. [3:01] >> Right, exactly. He said that for a [3:04] person to reach this level, it's like [3:06] walking around just to scout out good [3:09] food. [3:10] >> He lost a phone once, and it had data [3:12] on thousands of restaurants in it. [3:15] >> True, and it didn't just say which [3:17] restaurant to go to, but what to order [3:20] and what to remind the servers about [3:22] each dish. [3:23] >> That's jumping into the Yellow River. [3:25] Jumping into the Yellow River. [3:26] >> Right, you can't wash yourself clean [3:28] even if you jump into the Yellow River. [3:29] And Teacher Chen can even taste the [3:30] differences between Yoshinoya locations [3:32] . [3:32] >> This is, this is an exaggeration. [3:34] >> Actually, no. [3:35] >> Are you talking about the domestic [3:37] Yoshinoya locations? I rarely eat there [3:39] . [3:40] >> Really? Only if I'm working overtime at [3:43] the office. [3:44] >> Also, I've prepared something for [3:46] Teacher Xiaoqing to taste—this is [3:49] sausage made by our relative's [3:51] grandmother in Hebei. [3:52] >> Mhm. [3:53] >> I don't know if you...it's just a bit [3:55] of hometown flavor. Homemade sausage. [3:57] Mhm, this is northern-style sausage. [3:59] >> Northern-style sausage, huh. [4:00] >> I can't eat it. [4:01] >> Of course you can, it's for you guys. [4:03] Come on, let's eat and drink. [4:05] >> Come, come, come. [4:07] >> Today, I mean, sorry, let me, let me. [4:09] >> Let others, let others. [4:11] >> Right. [4:12] >> I'm saying Teacher Xiaoqing needs to [4:14] share his gourmet expertise with them. [4:15] You can talk about other experiences, [4:18] but let's talk about dining experiences [4:20] . [4:20] >> Mhm. [4:24] >> Can you even count how many times [4:26] you've had these dinners? [4:29] >> Oh, I've lost count. Lost count. [4:33] Someone asked me the other day, "You [4:35] guys always eat together with the same [4:37] few people?" How often did you meet [4:40] during the busiest times? At our [4:43] busiest, we would meet for a week. [4:45] >> Meeting every single day. [4:48] >> Yes, we'd have to discuss what the [4:51] theme was for the day. Uh, where we'd [4:54] meet tomorrow. It was always the same [4:57] few people. [4:58] >> Always being together, it's very [5:01] comfortable and very fun. Because [5:04] >> It's very fun. [5:05] >> Mhm, Lao Liu is the host. [5:07] >> Mhm. [5:08] >> He always has to have an opening [5:10] monologue. [5:11] >> He introduces everyone as if we don't [5:13] know each other. Whenever the four of [5:16] us are eating together, [5:17] >> he has to do an introduction, talking [5:19] about what everyone has been doing [5:21] lately. He does it very sincerely and [5:24] respectfully. Every time feels like [5:26] getting to know myself again while [5:28] eating with everyone, it's very [5:29] interesting. Fangzhou, have you joined [5:31] our gatherings? [5:32] >> No. [5:33] >> No. [5:34] >> I have joined. [5:35] >> I remember, but then... [5:36] >> They didn't tease you, did they? [5:37] >> Tease me or anything like that. Hey, [5:39] they all tease each other. [5:41] >> That was considered polite to me, but [5:42] what I felt left a deep impression on [5:44] me back then was what? [5:45] >> Ordering food. [5:46] >> There were a few times you weren't [5:48] there. [5:48] >> And, well, letting Lao Liu order food [5:50] was a very painful experience. [5:52] >> Because when Lao Liu orders, he looks [5:54] back and forth, and later we asked what [5:57] was up with Lao Liu. I remember Wang [5:59] Xiaofeng saying that Lao Liu orders [6:01] like this: he counts one, two, three, [6:03] and picks the sixth dish on every page. [6:05] >> Exactly. But ordering is truly an art [6:10] form. I feel that if you know a friend [6:13] like this in your life, it saves you so [6:15] much trouble. I have a friend I almost [6:17] worship; I mean, forget about China. [6:20] >> For example, when I get to Paris. [6:22] >> Hmm. [6:23] >> I ask what to eat or which restaurant [6:25] to go to. He calls or WeChats the [6:27] restaurant, just like this assistant, [6:30] saying to order this and that, and [6:32] tells the chef to do this and that, and [6:34] at what point to serve which dish. [6:36] >> You're saying he didn't even look at [6:38] the menu; he knows it by heart. [6:40] >> Actually, it's... [6:41] >> This guy. [6:42] >> He's incredible. [6:44] >> That I can do, that Hong Kong and Paris [6:46] part I can do. You also have the art of [6:49] ordering food. [6:50] >> How do they say it should be ordered? A [6:52] table of dishes should look like ridges [6:54] from the side and peaks from afar— [6:55] different from every angle. How did you [6:57] find that? That's very difficult for me [7:00] . [7:00] >> I never know what to order. Do you have [7:03] any principles, or is it just intuition [7:05] for you? [7:05] >> Well, it depends on who's coming; [7:08] that's the most important thing. If [7:12] Wendao comes, I definitely have to [7:14] order one that's, you know, up there. [7:17] >> Got to find one, um... [7:19] >> A dish that's a bit pretentious. [7:22] >> Something with soups or roots that's [7:24] prepared quite delicately, hmm. [7:26] >> Hmm. If, for example, someone from the [7:29] North comes, I must have a dish [7:32] centered around staples. This " [7:34] arranging dishes"—well, people call [7:37] it "arranging," but it's just ordering, [7:39] ordering, ordering. [7:40] >> Because for five people, how much food [7:42] should I order? Every time, regarding [7:44] the portion size, I say I don't have... [7:46] >> Hmm. [7:46] >> No, I don't. First, you have to be [7:48] familiar with the restaurant. Some [7:50] restaurants have really, really large [7:51] portions. [7:52] >> And most importantly, you must order [7:54] one centerpiece dish, that is... [7:56] >> Every restaurant actually only has one [7:58] or two dishes that are truly the best; [8:01] the rest are just forgettable, and now [8:03] with all these review sites and [8:05] word-of-mouth platforms, [8:07] >> it’s relatively easier, but [8:14] >> I also use a process of elimination; [8:16] for example, on review sites, I know [8:19] which ones pay for ads, so I just won't [8:21] go there. [8:24] >> How do you know that? [8:26] >> Yeah, I’m curious about that too, [8:28] because sometimes when we go somewhere, [8:29] I’m really unfamiliar with it and [8:31] have to check review sites, but I feel [8:33] like they’re very unreliable. [8:34] >> Well, if you don't have friends there, [8:37] you have to rely on that or review [8:39] sites. [8:40] >> Then just don't order the cheap stuff. [8:42] >> Mm. [8:43] >> Mm. Mm. [8:45] >> Just take the cheap ones out first. [8:47] >> I also think it’s better to remove [8:48] them first. [8:49] >> Cut them out, then you might get [8:50] something accurate. [8:51] >> Then—then I always ask the waiter for [8:53] recommendations; is that okay? [8:55] >> That’s certainly okay, but the [8:57] prerequisite for asking that is... [8:59] >> The prerequisite is that it’s a very [9:01] good restaurant. [9:02] >> They will have a professional attitude [9:05] when helping you order. [9:06] >> Right. [9:07] >> If you go to our restaurant, our [9:09] waiters will definitely tell you, "You [9:11] should order..." they’ll just pick [9:13] one for you, and you look at it and go, [9:15] "Damn, this is so expensive!" That’s [9:17] definitely how it is, because they want [9:19] a commission. [9:20] >> Exactly. [9:22] >> Yeah, they lose that professional [9:24] integrity. [9:25] >> And there’s another strange thing; [9:27] for example, at restaurants abroad, [9:29] don't just assume people overseas are [9:31] all very professional. They aren't. If [9:33] you ask what’s good today, what they [9:36] recommend might be the ingredients that [9:38] didn't sell and need to be cleared out [9:40] quickly, especially with seafood—this [9:42] is most common. Many Western [9:44] restaurants have a "catch of the day," [9:47] >> it’s best not to order it. Unless [9:49] it's a very high-end restaurant, [9:51] otherwise, what they give you is [9:53] usually... [9:53] >> That’s one scenario, but there’s [9:55] another situation, which is high volume [9:56] . [9:56] >> Right. [9:57] >> They need to move that volume. [9:59] >> Like, if I bought a huge batch of [10:01] Gillardeau oysters, I have to lower the [10:03] price a bit to make them move faster. [10:05] >> Right, so Teacher Xiaoqing, what do you [10:07] think is the best thing you’ve ever [10:10] eaten in your life? Home cooking? [10:12] >> Home-cooked food. [10:14] >> Hey, Fangzhou, what about you? Me? [10:17] >> I’m a person with no sense of taste; [10:19] I just can’t tell what’s delicious [10:21] and what isn't. I am essentially a [10:23] human Yelp review site. If someone [10:25] tells me something is delicious, for [10:27] example, if Teacher Xiaoqing says this [10:29] sausage is tasty, I’ll find it tasty. [10:30] But if Teacher Wendang says it’s not, [10:32] then what should I do? Is it actually [10:34] tasty or not? Are you a robot? [10:37] >> No, but I don't have a system for [10:38] discernment. Hmm. [10:40] >> Take someone who has eaten white rice [10:41] their whole life; if you bring them a [10:43] bowl of high-quality white rice today, [10:45] cooked perfectly with the right rice, [10:47] >> we’d say it's good, but that’s the [10:48] judgment of someone who has eaten rice [10:50] their entire life. It’s the same with [10:52] wine, so if you bring out a very [10:54] expensive wine, for most people, it’s [10:55] meaningless. [10:56] >> Yes, what he said is just like what Mr. [10:59] Chua Lam repeatedly says: there's no [11:01] point in eating wild animals. [11:03] >> That's right. [11:04] >> Because we don’t have the habit of [11:06] eating wild animals. Hmm, just [11:09] >> no foundation for that taste. [11:11] >> Right, and most importantly, the chefs [11:13] don't get the daily training. [11:15] >> They are most trained in pork; they [11:17] know exactly where to cut, which piece [11:20] is which, and I’ve seen this before, [11:22] so they know it. But wild game? No, it [11:26] doesn't work. [11:28] >> You’re talking about this kind of [11:29] meal, like eating with friends just to [11:32] be happy, right? But actually, when we [11:34] use the term "dinner party"(fanju), [11:37] >> you know, I looked it up online and [11:39] realized it’s all about social [11:40] etiquette and human relationships. [11:42] It’s a battlefield. I heard many [11:45] professional terms for the first time, [11:46] you know? Like, a dinner party has a " [11:49] party lead," what is that, and the [11:50] party... [11:51] >> And there are "party shills," too. [11:53] >> For example, this "party lead" is the [11:55] main target today. We are here to win [11:57] you over. You sit in the main seat; you [11:59] are the "party lead." [12:01] >> Does the "party lead" know they are the [12:02] "party lead"? [12:03] >> They might, or they might not. And then [12:06] , this "party shill" is specifically [12:08] hired, like an escort, to keep the [12:10] atmosphere lively and drink, making the [12:12] vibe happy, right? Then there’s the " [12:15] party pro," a shill for the shill. [12:17] It’s a complex system; they are [12:19] responsible for patching things up, [12:21] covering for the shill's mistakes. [12:23] >> Finally, there is the "party slave," [12:25] the one who comes to pay the bill. [12:27] >> Just the "party slave." [12:29] >> That’s a good one. I wonder how many [12:31] times I’ve been a "party slave." [12:32] >> This is a work dinner. [12:34] >> Right. There are actually many types of [12:37] dinner parties. [12:38] >> For example, there are matchmaking [12:40] dinners, or for networking... [12:42] >> Yes, there are all kinds of work [12:45] dinners. Different regions, different [12:47] social styles; the social scenes in [12:49] Shanghai and Beijing are completely [12:51] different. [12:52] >> Take Shanghai for example, if I go to [12:54] Shanghai and want to meet a Taoist [12:56] master through you, [12:58] >> to have a meal. [12:59] >> You would definitely ask him right then [13:02] and there. Then you'd ask him, see when [13:04] he's free, and it's settled. [13:06] >> Mm. [13:07] >> He won't promise you on the spot. [13:09] >> Right. [13:10] >> Beijing's social scene is like this— [13:12] don't let the mic pick this up— [13:15] >> It's just that I'm close to him, I was [13:17] with him just yesterday, I told him [13:19] when to come. [13:21] >> Tell him to come now, right now. "Come [13:24] on, come on," and when he arrives, he [13:27] says, "Damn, what bad timing today.""I [13:29] have another gathering elsewhere, [13:31] otherwise we'd have to eat until after [13:34] 3:00 to talk." He clearly... [13:36] >> The next day, you realize the next day, [13:39] >> He still hasn't come. He says he's sick [13:42] today and really can't make it. He asks [13:45] , "Can you wait one more day? If you [13:49] wait another day, I'll definitely get [13:52] him for you." Sigh, what a fool for [13:55] listening to that. Why would you [13:58] believe his nonsense? [14:01] >> Hey, I've seen another type of setup, [14:03] this kind of social scene, where you [14:06] often have this situation where you [14:08] didn't agree at first, and then I pick [14:10] up the phone and it's a friend I barely [14:13] know, right? But in New York, I'm not [14:16] in New York. I get these calls: "Hey, I [14:19] just met this incredibly talented, [14:21] beautiful woman, she could be on your [14:24] show! Didn't you ask me to give you [14:26] recommendations last time?" Or [14:27] something like that. "Come on, I'm [14:29] waiting for you." You say, "I have no [14:31] idea what he's talking about, what are [14:33] you saying?"" [14:34] >> He's right next door."" [14:35] >> He's right next door," yes, right next [14:38] door, yes. [14:38] >> Yes, and then sometimes they say, "Hey, [14:40] talk to him for a second, just say a [14:42] couple words," and like that, "Hey, [14:43] hello, how..." [14:44] >> You know he's pulling a scam on the [14:46] other end, right? But you seem to be [14:48] laughing so hard, have you experienced [14:50] this personally? Have you encountered [14:53] this? [14:53] >> I've experienced it firsthand and [14:55] learned how crafty older men can be. [14:57] >> I haven't experienced that. [14:59] >> I've run into it quite a few times. [15:01] >> Hmm, it's too much to recount. [15:04] >> You're saying that right now, men [15:05] usually pay the bill for you, right? [15:07] >> Uh. [15:08] >> Chinese men are all like that. I don't [15:11] like it when others pay, so I usually [15:12] pay the bill myself, because I'm the [15:14] one who orders the food, and when I [15:16] order, I say... [15:17] >> Yes, and I say, because I don't like [15:19] letting others pay, I say "I've got [15:21] this," right? [15:21] >> Yeah, and then I said let's guess the [15:23] total, and whoever gets it right pays, [15:25] but since I’m usually the one [15:26] ordering, I pretty much guess what I [15:28] ordered. [15:28] >> Are you guys adults or what, guessing [15:31] prices? [15:31] >> It’s just not liking to let the other [15:33] person pay, yeah. [15:34] >> You know, I went to Japan a while ago, [15:36] and what I’m about to say might sound [15:38] fake. Hmm. [15:40] >> But, there was this Japanese male [15:42] student I knew, [15:43] >> and he told me something I found hard [15:45] to understand. He said, [15:47] >> he said for Japanese girls, he was [15:50] confused at first too, he said if he [15:52] takes her out for a meal, in her eyes, [15:54] if you pay the bill, [15:56] >> it’s a big deal. It might even mean [15:59] you want to be more than friends. [16:01] You’re picking up the tab? That’s a [16:04] major move. And he said it’s really [16:07] something, because he feels that if you [16:10] buy them a meal and pay, [16:12] >> they start thinking you’re interested [16:14] in a romantic relationship. [16:16] >> But then, you send them a message, and [16:18] they don't reply for three days. [16:19] >> Hmm. [16:20] >> No reply for three days. I asked why, [16:23] and he said, look at how Chinese people [16:26] date, always in constant contact. But [16:29] with Japanese girls, you send a message [16:32] , [16:32] >> not only do they not reply, but three [16:34] days later, if you check their phone, [16:37] Hmm. [16:37] >> that message hasn't even been opened. [16:40] >> Oh. [16:41] >> I asked, "Why?" He said it's just [16:44] because they met you once, [16:46] >> and then they spend most of their time [16:48] alone, maybe busy with work, and they [16:50] think if they open it right away, [16:52] >> it becomes a burden, an obligation, [16:56] >> a real obligation to respond to [16:58] what’s going on. I felt like Japanese [17:00] people make a big deal out of nothing. [17:03] They take things so seriously, like "Oh [17:05] , I have to reply," so they wait three [17:06] days until they have time to deal with [17:08] it all at once. Sometimes couples date [17:10] three or four times and get married [17:12] within a few months. Hmm. [17:14] >> Later I asked, "Is that even possible?" [17:17] But there was a Japanese girl right [17:18] there, and I said, "Is that true for [17:19] you?" And the Japanese girl said, "Yeah [17:21] , it’s like that." I asked why they [17:23] don't reply the same day, and she said, [17:25] "We just don't feel the need to reply [17:27] immediately." [17:28] >> Yes, because they feel that answering [17:30] someone's question is a very serious [17:33] matter, so they usually like to keep [17:35] their conversations very casual. [17:39] >> For instance, if you ask for their [17:42] opinion, they might say, "It doesn't [17:44] look bad," but what they actually mean [17:47] is " [17:48] >> It's not very good." [17:50] >> It’s not good, so they stall for now. [17:52] But when you talk about taking girls [17:54] out to dinner, I think it’s sometimes [17:55] even more troublesome than with [17:56] Europeans; Chinese people, [17:58] >> But in China, I don't think there's any [17:59] problem that can't be solved over a [18:01] meal. [18:01] >> If one meal can't solve it, then two [18:03] meals will. Yes, that’s how it is, [18:05] especially when it comes to things like [18:07] blind dates; basically, it’s all [18:09] settled at the dinner table. [18:11] >> At the very least, you’ll be able to [18:13] get to know each other very, very well. [18:16] >> I’ve acted as a matchmaker many times [18:18] like that. Actually, it’s just that [18:22] ... [18:23] >> The success rate isn't particularly [18:26] high, but they will definitely interact [18:28] , unlike in Japan. [18:30] >> But there are also people who are more [18:33] cautious, like Uncle Quan. [18:35] >> Mm. [18:36] >> The screenwriter who wrote "The Cliff," [18:38] I’ve introduced him to people many [18:39] times. [18:40] >> He just loves drinking too much. Mm. [18:44] >> Like when we’d say, "Let's go to [18:46] another place to keep drinking," and [18:48] I'd tell him, "You take the girl home," [18:50] but he’d say, "No, [18:53] >> where are you guys going to drink? [18:56] Don't leave me out, I'm coming with you [18:58] ." [18:59] >> So that makes it really difficult, oh [19:02] my god. [19:03] >> Going on a blind date like that. [19:05] >> So, you mentioned these dinner [19:06] gatherings; sometimes I really feel [19:08] that, whether it’s getting things [19:10] done or whatever, you just have to get [19:12] people to eat; it seems for Chinese [19:14] people, they really believe that just [19:16] having a meal... [19:16] >> I don't understand, these matters have [19:19] principles; how can just inviting [19:21] someone to dinner resolve anything? [19:24] >> Uh, how should I put it? Uh, you're [19:28] face-to-face. [19:29] >> Mm. [19:33] >> But in regular settings, it might be [19:35] too formal, or things you can't say [19:38] otherwise might come out under the [19:40] influence of alcohol, which is often [19:42] more accepted, so organizing a dinner [19:45] is always the hardest thing to do. Why [19:49] is it hard? [19:50] >> It's hard because, for example, when [19:52] intellectuals eat together. [19:54] >> Who doesn't get along with whom. [19:56] >> Right. [19:57] >> They can't even eat at the same table. [19:59] I really once, I used to organize [20:01] dinner parties for older men for about [20:04] a year, but I eventually resigned [20:06] firmly. I literally watched a guy [20:09] eating like this, just facing away from [20:11] the person next to him for the entire [20:14] night, just to show he was ignoring [20:16] them. Even worse, what led to my direct [20:20] resignation was that I invited one of [20:22] his... [20:23] >> three ex-girlfriends [20:25] >> to the dinner. [20:26] >> I organized an event, and I had no idea [20:28] your cultural circles were so chaotic, [20:30] you know? [20:30] >> Oh, they are just truly chaotic. I [20:33] really look down on that. [20:36] >> Later, even those who came in [20:38] afterwards, and at that time, what was [20:41] the situation like? [20:43] >> Eventually, a girl even cried, and it [20:45] was a complete mess on the spot. [20:47] >> Was his current girlfriend there? [20:49] >> Yes, she was there. He brought his [20:51] current girlfriend, right. I was so [20:54] naive to organize it. I’m not a [20:57] gossipy person at all, so I had no idea [21:00] about all that past history. [21:03] >> This makes me feel that being a person [21:05] in Beijing, I sometimes feel a bit [21:08] tired, you know? Because I feel I have [21:10] to stay sharp and keep my wits about me [21:12] . Sometimes, by comparison, look at [21:14] what they say, for example, it's better [21:15] in Shenzhen. It seems more relaxed, [21:17] like there's no drama between people. [21:20] In Beijing, I always feel I have to— [21:21] more than in Hong Kong or anywhere else [21:23] —be a bit smarter, because truly, [21:25] this person can't meet that person here [21:27] . You don't know—one time we were at [21:29] a table. We were eating, and there was [21:31] this Chinese-American actress from [21:32] Hollywood. Americans are actually quite [21:35] oblivious, you know? She thought [21:37] everyone was friends. She got a call [21:38] saying, "Hey, we are so-and-so," and [21:40] the other side said, "Come over to our [21:42] place to hang out." She said, "Sure," [21:44] and promised everyone would go after [21:46] dinner. [21:46] >> But in the end, after dinner, most [21:48] people left, and only she went. She was [21:50] like, "What is going on with you guys?" [21:52] >> Then, an elder next to her said, "You [21:54] just came back from America and you [21:56] don't know. In Beijing, not everyone [21:59] can see everyone. Some people just [22:01] don't get along; they absolutely can't. [22:04] " It means you have to keep your [22:06] emotional intelligence up; you really [22:07] have to be a people person. You have to [22:09] read the room, because sometimes [22:11] between two people, their expressions [22:13] ... [22:13] >> You can just feel there's something off [22:15] between them. [22:16] >> As a writer, don't you have that sense? [22:18] >> I don't attend dinner parties because I [22:20] prefer to eat at home. So I listen to [22:22] these dinner party stories and I find [22:24] them really enjoyable, like I was [22:26] actually there. Because when I do [22:28] attend, I just eat, so many people [22:30] claim to know me, but maybe we were [22:32] just at the same dinner. I just eat and [22:34] leave, that’s how it is. [22:36] >> So, I really enjoy listening to these [22:38] stories. [22:39] >> But I think as a writer, a dining place [22:42] is a great spot to understand life. [22:45] >> Take me, just take me along. [22:47] >> No, other than this kind of dinner [22:49] party, hmm. [22:50] >> The opposite of a group dinner is [22:53] eating alone. [22:53] >> I, I person... [22:56] >> I really like it. I especially like [22:59] eating alone, just listening to the [23:01] people next to me chatting. [23:03] >> And, and you immediately know when you [23:05] go to different places; if they are [23:07] talking about politics, it must be [23:09] Beijing. [23:09] >> Right. [23:12] >> If you are talking about business, [23:14] it’s Shanghai or Zhejiang, right, [23:16] like stocks and things, it definitely [23:18] would be there. [23:20] >> And I think for Chinese people, in some [23:23] aspects, for example, it's very awkward [23:25] when asking for a favor. [23:26] >> Hmm. Look, during this meal, not a [23:29] single word was mentioned, though [23:31] everyone had this on their mind, but [23:33] they just kept chatting aimlessly. [23:35] Often it’s right before the check [23:36] comes, when they can't hold back [23:38] anymore, then they drop a few words. [23:40] Sometimes I feel like, look, it seems [23:43] like they’re just waiting to bring it [23:45] up now. It’s too impolite. [23:47] >> It’s simply called impolite. [23:50] >> Everyone has been talking nonsense the [23:51] whole time, but I find these types of [23:53] dinner parties quite boring, since [23:55] everyone knows what’s going on. [23:56] >> However, a dinner party reveals a [23:59] person's character the best, like the [24:01] speed at which they use their [24:03] chopsticks. [24:05] >> How long they look at the dishes is [24:07] also a test of a person. [24:10] >> If they look, or how long they look, [24:12] what does that indicate? [24:14] >> It means this person is definitely very [24:16] picky. [24:17] >> Hmm. [24:18] >> Which piece they look at, uh. [24:20] >> Which part is the leg, which part is [24:22] the best. [24:23] >> Yes, yes, exactly. [24:25] >> There was this former bandit who used [24:28] to talk about eating fish. [24:29] >> Hmm. [24:30] >> He would kidnap a child. [24:32] >> Hmm. [24:33] >> Starve them for three days. [24:35] >> Hmm. [24:36] >> Then prepare a fish for them. If the [24:38] child ate the meat from the back, [24:39] picking out the big chunks, it was a [24:41] poor kid, so they'd let him go. Hmm. [24:43] >> If he immediately dug into the fish [24:45] belly. [24:46] >> Hmm. [24:47] >> That one has to be held for a few days. [24:49] >> Hmm. [24:50] >> If he immediately went for the meat on [24:51] the cheeks or the head. [24:52] >> The first chopstick grab was that [24:54] tender crescent-shaped meat. [24:56] >> His family wouldn't be able to get him [24:58] back without going bankrupt, because he [25:00] was the most spoiled child in the [25:01] family. [25:02] >> Hmm. [25:03] >> Oh. [25:05] >> But hearing you say this, I actually [25:07] recalled chatting with a friend the [25:09] other day who works in the service [25:11] industry in China, and he had a real [25:13] insight. He said no matter how [25:15] exquisite or how well I do things, [25:18] it’s useless. [25:19] >> He said he feels that Chinese customers [25:22] don't really care. [25:23] >> Is what I'm saying right? Do you... [25:26] >> Do you understand? He said sometimes I [25:28] carefully design something, but they [25:29] don't appreciate it at all. [25:31] >> What he makes is rare. Also, if no one [25:33] praises the food, then such a dinner [25:35] gathering is rare; unless it’s [25:37] friends, people don't praise the food, [25:39] which is quite different from dining in [25:41] Japan. In Japan, not praising the food [25:43] is a very rare and strange thing to do. [25:46] Does he make Western food? [25:48] >> Yes, yes he does; well, to be precise, [25:51] true gourmets take three generations to [25:53] cultivate. [25:54] >> We’ve only had enough to eat for less [25:56] than thirty years. [25:58] >> Hmm, that might be a very, very [26:01] important reason. And another thing is, [26:08] I often get asked this question, asking [26:11] if our Chinese cuisine is superior to [26:13] the West—everyone seems to have this [26:16] misconception. [26:20] >> They think it’s far superior, yes. [26:23] >> In reality, you only get great food [26:26] when you have picky customers. Hmm, yes [26:30] . [26:30] >> And [26:31] >> We are all too—if you look at China, [26:34] Northerners are too easygoing, too [26:36] uncritical, and too forgiving; even if [26:39] it's made poorly, it’s just forgotten [26:41] , but [26:42] >> In the South—I’m in Beijing, for [26:44] example, if I go to the Northeast [26:46] >> Hmm. [26:47] >> A friend invites me to eat, says where [26:49] to go, so we go there; everyone is [26:51] especially accommodating. But if I go [26:53] to Guangzhou, say, and suggest a place [26:55] to eat, people will fiercely object, [26:58] saying, "How can we eat there?" And if [27:00] I suggest another place, it might get [27:03] rejected by many again. [27:05] >> You just feel that Cantonese people are [27:07] incredibly happy; they have so many [27:09] choices, and everyone has their own [27:11] specific taste, just like a [27:13] >> Young woman standing in front of a [27:16] closet full of clothes saying she has [27:18] nothing to wear—it's that kind of [27:21] happiness, oh my. [27:22] >> So you see, it's really in Guangzhou. [27:25] >> Hmm. [27:26] >> It’s not really in Beijing. [27:28] >> Hmm. [27:29] >> Actually, Beijing is a place where so [27:32] many people converge. [27:33] >> It has everything to do with whether [27:35] the diners are picky or not. There is [27:38] another reason, and that is that I [27:40] think our different countries and [27:42] cultures have different attitudes [27:44] toward food sometimes; for instance, as [27:46] I mentioned before, why I think my [27:48] friend’s idea to host a three-star [27:50] Michelin [27:51] >> Gourmet tour would fail. [27:53] >> Hmm. [27:54] >> The reason is simple, because he [27:56] himself felt it was embarrassing; he [27:58] put in a lot of effort to book the top [28:00] spots in Paris and Spain that are [28:01] extremely hard to reserve, perhaps [28:03] needing to book a year in advance, [28:05] >> And then packed it with one a day, one [28:08] every day. Then that group of people [28:10] would go in chatting and making a loud [28:11] ruckus every day, and regardless of [28:13] them being impolite, the main thing is [28:15] that the guests themselves were all [28:16] unsatisfied, hmm. [28:17] >> The dishes were served so slowly that [28:19] we spent nearly four or five hours [28:21] eating, and we couldn't even complain; [28:22] plus, the food wasn't good, mostly just [28:24] unsatisfying. [28:25] >> Right. [28:26] >> In the end, everyone was unhappy—the [28:28] restaurant was unhappy, and the guests [28:30] were unhappy. I later analyzed the [28:32] reasons with him, and one is that the [28:35] way Chinese people approach dining— [28:37] our attitude and methods—is quite [28:39] different from what you see in Japan or [28:42] the West. For example, we sit together [28:45] at one table, and all the dishes are [28:47] laid out before we even pick up our [28:49] chopsticks. [28:50] >> Our entire state of mind is relaxed and [28:53] flexible. [28:54] >> Right. [28:55] >> Like, if I want to stop talking to eat, [28:57] I just pick up my chopsticks and have a [28:59] bite. [28:59] >> Or maybe just have a few bites. Mm. [29:02] >> This kind of meal can be as long or as [29:04] short as you like; you can finish in an [29:06] hour, or you can take five hours. [29:07] >> Mm. But for Westerners or the Japanese, [29:11] dishes come one by one; you can't just [29:14] put your chopsticks down and walk off, [29:16] right? That’s not how we do things in [29:19] China. [29:20] >> I just went to Shijiazhuang. [29:23] >> Exactly. People there basically expect [29:26] you to sit still. I had friends with me [29:28] , and when I came back, I wondered—if [29:30] they serve over a dozen courses one [29:32] after another, how are you supposed to [29:34] wait? What do you do? It just ends up [29:37] being very awkward. For instance, if [29:39] someone keeps standing up to offer a [29:40] toast, while the other side is finished [29:42] and just waiting for you for half an [29:44] hour. And that, I think, shows that the [29:46] cultures are just too different. [29:48] Another point is that when Westerners [29:50] eat at a Michelin-starred restaurant or [29:53] the Japanese go to their high-end [29:55] places, they treat it like attending a [29:58] classical concert—very solemn. [30:00] >> Exactly. You spend the whole day doing [30:03] nothing else, just waiting for the [30:06] evening. Our attitude is that dining [30:08] should be relaxing, but they are the [30:11] opposite; they are very serious and [30:13] tense. Their whole state of mind is [30:16] hyper-focused, and with modern [30:18] molecular gastronomy or those delicate [30:20] dishes, where one plate has a dozen [30:23] ingredients and complex methods, you [30:25] have to pay extreme attention just to [30:28] taste the food. [30:29] >> So, as Teacher Chen mentioned regarding [30:31] these dinner gatherings, it shows that [30:32] Chinese people are very particular [30:34] about the underlying meaning, like the [30:35] saying, "The effort lies outside the [30:37] poem," or "The intent is not on the [30:39] wine." [30:39] >> Our intent has never really been about [30:41] the act of eating itself. When he's out [30:43] at dinner, his eyes are fixed on the [30:44] girl, right? How could he possibly [30:46] taste his food? You know what I mean, [30:48] it's like when we're at a high-end [30:50] Western restaurant, you feel like it's [30:52] really like watching a performance, [30:54] appreciating a show, it’s that kind [30:55] of taste, but. [30:56] >> People will discuss the food, [30:58] >> You know, it's not that we necessarily [31:01] have to spend a lot, but a lot of the [31:03] time, take hotels for example, [31:05] >> For many wealthy people, I've realized, [31:07] there's really no need for them to stay [31:09] in hotels. [31:10] >> They are often first-generation [31:11] entrepreneurs who grew up as farmers, [31:13] and they still retain their rather [31:15] rough living habits to this day. [31:16] >> For them, honestly, staying in a [31:18] five-star hotel is a waste; they might [31:20] as well be in a budget hostel, they're [31:21] the same to them, you know, because [31:23] they don't care about the bed or how [31:25] firm it is. You see, many people don't [31:27] even realize this; often when we're [31:30] sitting at the dinner table, I [31:32] sometimes think, oh, this is so [31:34] wonderful, but then there are these [31:36] bosses in Hong Kong who spend hundreds [31:39] of thousands on a single meal, yet I [31:41] feel sorry for them. They're just [31:44] clinking glasses, "Hey, buddy, this and [31:47] that, I’m about to make hundreds of [31:49] millions," while downing drinks, what [31:51] are they even eating? I had a friend [31:54] the other day, my friend is over 50, [31:57] and his son loves whisky. [31:59] >> Yeah, [32:00] >> He kept some whisky, he took us to his [32:02] place and just poured it all out. [32:05] >> Then his son came back and yelled at us [32:08] old guys, telling us not to drink his [32:10] stuff. Later his son said, "It's not [32:12] that I don't want the uncles to drink [32:14] it, it's just that you don't understand [32:16] ; this is such good stuff I brought [32:18] from Scotland, you can't appreciate it [32:20] at all, you're just wasting it." [32:21] >> I now feel that a lot of fine food is [32:23] wasted just like that. [32:24] >> And then there's the attitude people [32:26] have behind the scenes toward the chefs [32:28] , [32:28] >> It's so different, so disrespectful. [32:30] >> Of course, things are much better now, [32:32] much better, I think they’ve done a [32:34] great service, for example, like you [32:36] said, we don't usually thank the chef, [32:37] right? Let me give you an example. Once [32:41] I invited a friend, a few friends, to [32:43] come to Hong Kong to see me, and I took [32:45] them out to dinner; some of them were [32:47] from the entertainment industry, famous [32:49] stars and such, also dining there. And [32:53] so, I chose a very good restaurant for [32:56] them. The head chef was someone who had [32:58] retired from the business a few years [33:01] ago. During those days he came back to [33:03] cook, and I also know him—he is [33:04] highly respected by Hong Kong people, [33:06] one of the top masters of Cantonese [33:08] cuisine in Hong Kong. Anyway, after [33:10] finishing the meal, I came out. Then he [33:13] saw me; he is someone who knows me, and [33:14] he came over: "Long time no see, come [33:16] on, let's take a photo together, let's [33:18] take a photo." I was with a few friends [33:20] who didn't really know who he was. But [33:22] those companions made me very [33:24] embarrassed; his manager immediately [33:26] asked, "You're not going to post this [33:28] on WeChat, are you?" This, no...Because [33:30] their whole concept was: if a chef [33:32] takes a photo with you, are you [33:34] planning to put it on the wall or [33:36] something? They never thought that this [33:38] person is a deity to us. [33:40] >> Our attitude is like this: for example, [33:42] once in Europe, we met some friends, [33:44] and they said, "This is a three-star [33:47] chef from somewhere, how amazing he is. [33:49] " We should be the ones scrambling to [33:51] take a photo with him. [33:52] >> Instead of the other way around; the [33:54] whole concept, the concept regarding [33:56] chefs here is just too different, yes. [33:59] I have seen foreign heads of state [34:02] twice. [34:03] >> Once was Austria, [34:05] >> Mm. [34:06] >> Once was Sweden. [34:08] >> Mm. [34:09] >> After the meal. They would go out to [34:11] give gifts. [34:12] >> Mm. [34:13] >> But you know, sometimes in Beijing, or [34:16] in many places in China, there is a [34:18] phenomenon: why does a restaurant... [34:20] >> Suddenly stop tasting good after a [34:22] while? The biggest problem, I think, is [34:26] why does the taste sometimes change? [34:28] >> I want to bring up a topic, which is [34:31] that actually making good food and [34:33] doing business are... [34:35] >> Two different pulls. [34:37] >> When you are desperately focused on [34:39] making great food, you might not be [34:41] making any money. [34:41] >> Mm. [34:43] >> Or your prices are extremely high. And [34:46] when you've made great food and many [34:48] people come, and they are desperately [34:51] waiting for a table, you think, "Oh, [34:53] why shouldn't I..." [34:54] >> Right. [34:55] >> Mm. [34:56] >> Open a branch. [34:58] >> You can't control it, you can't control [34:59] the overall quality. [35:00] >> A lot of it might be things that have [35:02] little to do with dining. [35:04] >> For example... [35:05] >> This person cooks very well, and they [35:08] carve that phoenix so vividly; yes, yes [35:11] , exactly. [35:12] >> What I hate most is when I participate [35:14] in international culinary competitions, [35:16] people say, "If we give first place to [35:18] China, look at how much effort they [35:20] spent carving this big phoenix; we'll [35:22] just start judging from second place." [35:24] Oh, so in Hebei, we have an old saying: [35:27] "A donkey's dung is shiny on the [35:29] outside"—it's all just superficial [35:31] work. I... [35:32] >> Whenever I encounter a restaurant that [35:34] carves dragons or phoenixes for me, I [35:35] know it's over; you've spent all your [35:37] effort on the wrong things. About that [35:39] studio of ours, did I even get there at [35:41] all? Back when we were in Beijing, I [35:43] said, "Should I go grab some zhajiang [35:44] noodles?" The place had eighteen tiers [35:46] of staff; from the entrance, it was [35:47] just, "Yes, sir, yes, sir," and "What [35:49] is your surname?" I said, "My surname [35:51] is Dou." Good grief, past the second [35:53] gate, the third gate, they kept [35:54] shouting it all the way in. Passing [35:56] through, snap, snap, snap, you go [35:57] through eighteen gates to a tiny [35:59] private room—so dramatic, just for a [36:01] bowl of noodles. The soybean paste [36:03] itself, I felt it was like it had [36:05] solidified. I could tell you were [36:08] saying it was stuck, and these people [36:10] were all dressed like eunuchs, offering [36:13] to reheat it. But I really, really am [36:17] very curious. Since I’m always in [36:19] Beijing, I stay there often, but I [36:22] rarely go out to eat. I’m either at [36:25] the company or, lately, I’ve fallen [36:27] to the point of just ordering room [36:29] service at the hotel. Why? I don’t [36:34] know. So unless I look for more [36:37] opportunities to eat with others, I [36:40] find it too difficult. Beijing is [36:42] clearly the capital, people from [36:44] everywhere are here, and in theory, all [36:47] sorts of resources, including wealth, [36:49] are here too. But I find it hard to [36:52] just stumble upon a place on the street [36:54] ; it's really too rare. [36:56] >> But it’s much better in the South. I [36:59] remember Wang Sanbiao once called me [37:01] when he was in Chengdu. I asked him [37:03] where he was staying. I had no idea [37:05] where that place even was. I said, "Go [37:07] downstairs now, walk forward, are there [37:08] any restaurants ahead?" He said, "Yes." [37:11] I told him, "Go eat at the second one [37:12] you see." He ended up writing a long [37:14] blog post about how good Xiaojin’s [37:16] recommendation was. The density of [37:17] restaurants there is just so high. [37:19] >> I get the sense from our conversation [37:21] that you seem to think... [37:23] >> Northerners have coarser tastes, while [37:25] Southerners are relatively more refined [37:28] . [37:28] >> That’s been the case since the Han [37:30] Dynasty. Oh, the Han Dynasty built [37:35] their capital in Chang'an, but if you [37:38] look at the population maps made by [37:40] Professor Jianxiong, you’ll know... [37:43] >> There were more people in the South. [37:45] >> Where was the GDP? In the middle and [37:48] lower reaches of the Yangtze River. [37:50] There’s no way around it, because one [37:52] harvest a year—food and agricultural [37:55] civilization... [37:56] >> Exactly. [37:57] >> Are inseparable. The difference between [38:00] one harvest a year, three harvests [38:02] every two years, and two harvests a [38:04] year is truly worlds apart in terms of [38:06] quality. [38:07] >> Yeah, that analysis makes sense. [38:09] Generally speaking, including places [38:11] like Jiangnan in the south, for [38:13] Southern scholars, it implies a more [38:15] nuanced, more delicate sensibility. [38:17] >> Right, and I think even in places that [38:19] aren't traditionally considered very [38:21] wealthy, for example, our southern [38:22] cities like Chaozhou. [38:23] >> Mm. It's very hard to find anything [38:27] that tastes bad there. [38:28] >> Chaozhou is a place where, if someone [38:30] claims to be a gourmet but hasn't been [38:33] to Shantou, well, they aren't a real [38:35] gourmet at all, because it has [38:37] preserved the legacy of China, [38:39] equivalent to the traditions of Kaifeng [38:41] , [38:45] >> and there are many layers, such as raw [38:48] fish slices, which date back to the Qin [38:51] Dynasty, or fermented wine, which is [38:53] from the Song Dynasty, or like, this, [38:56] this, the snow- [39:00] >> That's from the Song Dynasty; you can [39:02] really see all these layers, everything [39:04] is there. [39:05] >> Wait, so do you mean the flavors we eat [39:07] today are the same as those from [39:08] ancient times, or is there a difference [39:10] ? [39:10] >> There are people who specialize in this [39:12] , and if we go into it today, it will [39:14] get way too complicated, but it is a [39:16] uniquely precious island of culture. [39:18] >> Yes, Shantou is a truly precious gem of [39:21] Chinese cuisine. Incredible, absolutely [39:23] incredible. [39:24] >> That taro paste is so sweet! [39:27] >> And besides, I think in 2017 China is [39:30] bound to ruin something again. I'm [39:32] worried because we always have a food [39:34] trend every year, from crayfish to [39:36] whatever else. [39:37] >> I know what you mean, exactly. [39:39] >> With this Chaozhou trend you're talking [39:41] about, I feel there's a conspiracy [39:43] behind it. [39:43] >> Yeah, a meat slicer now makes 30,000 [39:45] yuan a month. [39:46] >> Ah. [39:47] >> Ah. [39:48] >> Mm. [39:49] >> That's higher than my salary. What kind [39:51] of conspiracy do you think it is? [39:53] >> I don't think it's natural for it to be [39:55] hyped up this high; there's just too [39:57] much manipulation involved. [39:59] >> Like us, since we eat a bit more, I can [40:01] tell if the meat is actually from [40:04] Shantou. [40:04] >> Mm. [40:06] >> This is the taste of yellow cattle. [40:08] >> Mm. [40:09] >> And this beef is just water-injected [40:12] beef. Oh, the price difference is [40:14] actually huge, but when they sell it, [40:17] it's all cut into pieces and the [40:19] texture looks roughly the same. The [40:21] waters here are too deep, so... [40:24] >> You're so right, you're absolutely [40:26] right. [40:27] >> Last year they ruined Chongqing noodles [40:29] , completely ruined them. [40:31] >> Every street was full of Chongqing [40:32] noodles, and now it's finally this [40:34] beef's turn. Mm, that's why I think [40:36] people say that in China, you really [40:38] have to live like an expert. [40:40] >> In every aspect of life, people are [40:42] either being cheated or being played [40:45] for fools. I feel that things related [40:47] to the sense of taste are just too easy [40:49] to manipulate; take drinking tea, for [40:51] instance, we all know how that goes. It [40:53] is not an illusion, you know. It’s [40:55] not an illusion; it’s truly a system [40:57] of refined taste. Don't you think? At [40:59] first, you can’t taste anything, but [41:02] as you get deeper into it, you really [41:04] can distinguish between a Hongyin or a [41:06] Songpin; you develop this system of [41:08] taste. But most people can't tell the [41:10] difference at all. For those who can't, [41:12] when you go to a tea shop, you'll [41:14] believe whatever they tell you and pay [41:16] whatever price they ask, and the same [41:17] goes for all kinds of food. I've also [41:19] noticed, take Beijing Opera for example [41:21] , why do people say it’s declining? [41:23] The people who appreciate it are gone. [41:25] Right. [41:26] >> Exactly, if you can’t tell what’s [41:27] good or even know why it’s good, then [41:29] it’s over. So I feel that when it [41:31] comes to the way of food and drink, [41:33] I’ve had several friends in the [41:35] industry recently, and I have to say, I [41:37] really feel quite emotional about it. [41:39] Is it like this in every industry in [41:41] China right now? Are we heading towards [41:43] a country where bad money drives out [41:45] the good? I used to believe that doing [41:48] things seriously and striving for the [41:50] best, with every detail reflecting your [41:52] sincerity, could never be the wrong [41:54] approach. [41:55] >> But from a profit-driven, money-making [41:57] perspective, it actually is wrong, and [41:59] it just doesn't make money. In the end, [42:02] you put all your heart and money into [42:04] it, but I can't even keep it running, [42:06] while the place across the street, [42:09] which is just cheap and gimmicky, makes [42:11] a fortune. [42:12] >> They get rich and open branches. So I [42:14] wonder, will this eventually lead to a [42:17] situation where the market is dominated [42:19] by people who have no taste and can't [42:21] tell the good from the bad? [42:22] >> So, overall, do you think the number of [42:24] good restaurants in China has increased [42:26] or decreased? [42:27] >> Overall, it has definitely increased, [42:29] there's no question about that. If you [42:31] look at the official figures, they are [42:34] absolutely staggering. [42:35] >> It contributes very, very significantly [42:38] to GDP growth. [42:39] >> And another thing is, never worry. [42:42] There are always hidden masters among [42:44] the people. [42:45] >> No matter where I go, I can always find [42:48] something surprisingly delicious to eat [42:50] . Just two days ago, during the [42:54] Guangzhou TV Festival, I had a meal in [42:57] Panyu. [42:58] >> Mm-hmm. [43:00] >> Everyone was there, it was a shabby [43:02] street, and there were easily a hundred [43:04] people. [43:06] >> Everyone was just waiting there for a [43:08] table to clear. There’s offal over [43:10] there; if there’s offal congee, you [43:12] just wait. I waited from 10:00 until [43:15] 12:30. When the fresh batch arrived, [43:18] people rushed for it. [43:19] >> What was that exactly? Can you describe [43:22] it? [43:23] >> It’s too bloody. I can put it this [43:26] way: even the fresh pig intestines were [43:30] still moving. Oh my god. [43:34] >> It was truly fresh, and it was so [43:37] delicious—simply unrivaled. [43:40] >> That’s not common. It makes me wonder [43:42] if people say the Chinese are the [43:44] cruelest people on earth. Yes, no, but [43:46] it has to be eaten sooner or later; [43:48] it's just eating meat while it’s [43:50] fresh. [43:51] >> Right, exactly. Like in Japan, they eat [43:54] it raw right after slaughter. [43:56] >> Foreigners show respect for meat [43:58] through aging. [44:00] >> Right. Hmm. [44:02] >> Chinese show respect for meat by [44:04] keeping it fresh. It’s just that it [44:07] must be fresh. [44:09] >> Regarding whether this is cruel or not [44:12] ...That’s true, but people who eat [44:15] offal are actually the most frugal [44:17] people. Exactly. You aren’t being [44:20] wasteful. [44:21] >> You aren't being wasteful; you eat [44:23] everything. I think that’s the right [44:24] attitude. [44:25] >> It’s the same all over the world; if [44:27] you measure this world... [44:28] >> Offal is the heart of it, right? [44:30] >> Yes, exactly. Even Japan has very [44:33] delicious offal. [44:34] >> And what I hear you talking about is [44:36] going to the countryside. [44:37] >> The best things are found among the [44:39] common people. [44:39] >> I also don't think it's in big-city [44:41] restaurants. [44:42] >> Oh, just think about how expensive the [44:44] storefront rent is. [44:46] >> Hmm. [44:47] >> It makes it impossible to survive. [44:49] >> Hmm. [44:50] >> You really, once you reach this level, [44:53] um. Let me tell you a rather [44:55] extraordinary story from the time of [44:58] the earthquake. I went to Qingchuan to [45:01] deliver... [45:03] >> supplies. [45:04] >> After the road was cut off, I was [45:06] waiting there. [45:07] >> In front of a school, there was a shop [45:10] selling spicy intestines. [45:11] >> Hmm. [45:13] >> It had just been served when an [45:15] earthquake hit. [45:17] >> Oh, an earthquake? [45:19] >> Yes, I had just taken one bite. It was [45:22] so delicious, and although everyone [45:25] else ran out, I thought, "If I'm going [45:27] to die, I'd rather die eating this." So [45:30] I went back in. Shocking. It was [45:34] delicious enough to make you risk your [45:37] life. [45:38] >> The most delicious, the ultimate [45:40] delicacy is definitely hidden in the [45:43] deep mountains. Fortunately, people [45:45] have enjoyed traveling to the [45:47] countryside and taking road trips these [45:49] years. [45:50] >> You can always find it. I mean, if you [45:53] don't believe me, next time you go to [45:55] Hangzhou...Go to a county called Kaihua [45:57] , at the source of the Qiantang River. [46:00] >> There’s a small restaurant on the [46:02] mountainside. [46:03] >> Hmm. [46:04] >> You don't even need to order; just tell [46:05] them to bring you two random dishes. [46:07] Every dish is delicious. I asked the [46:09] owner, "Why don't you open in Hangzhou? [46:11] " He said it wouldn't be the same in [46:13] Hangzhou. [46:13] >> Back then, it was called the Dongfeng [46:15] Market, where everyone would sit down [46:16] —it was bustling. [46:17] >> So Master Ma sighed deeply, wondering [46:19] how social trends have become so good. [46:21] >> No, let me tell you, I’ll try to [46:22] interpret this, but I'm just [46:24] speculating here. The girl who wanted [46:26] to pay seems to be a migrant worker in [46:28] this city; they used to be best friends [46:30] , but the girl being treated seems to [46:32] be a college student there. Actually, [46:34] the reason she was so eager to pay in [46:36] the end—and those other girls, the [46:38] premise is that they were all drunk. [46:40] Mainly because they were drunk. [46:42] >> Right, mainly drunk, but in this [46:44] drunkenness, there’s a sense of not [46:46] being truly drunk. [46:47] >> Money—those few girls thought she [46:49] didn't have money because she was just [46:51] working here. [46:51] >> I’m just guessing, but she might have [46:54] had some pride, thinking, "Hey, how can [46:56] you say I don't have money?""Can't I [46:58] pay the bill?" They said, "You don't, [47:00] you're just working here, we'll pay, [47:02] we'll pay." [47:03] >> When I read the news, I first thought [47:05] of our younger days, of these [47:06] experiences of skipping out on the bill [47:08] . I’ve had this happen countless [47:10] times. The first time was in Shenzhen. [47:12] >> We were having a great feast, but when [47:14] it was time to pay, the person who [47:16] invited us couldn't be found. [47:17] >> Once they couldn't be found, someone [47:18] quick-witted—you know, there’s [47:20] always someone quick-witted—would say [47:21] , "Oh, I have an emergency at home, I [47:22] have to go first." Then, as things went [47:24] on, someone suddenly realized, "Wait, [47:26] no one can leave, if we all leave, what [47:27] happens?" And then that person just [47:29] wouldn't come back. Master Ma mentioned [47:30] this, and I feel like I've seen it on [47:32] the news somewhere. [47:33] >> Yes, this is recent news. [47:35] >> I just think, for one thing, they [47:36] definitely drank way too much. Beyond [47:38] drinking too much, that doesn't count. [47:41] It seems not many young people nowadays [47:43] have one person pay the bill like that, [47:45] because I see that the post-80s and 90s [47:48] generations all go Dutch. [47:50] >> They all go Dutch, and I heard that [47:52] with WeChat Pay now—Shanghainese [47:55] people always liked going Dutch—but [47:57] now, the post-80s and 90s generation, [47:59] when they split a bill, for example, [48:02] down to the cents, like four people [48:04] eating together. Because of WeChat, [48:07] it’s even clearer now. Even down to [48:09] the decimal points. [48:10] >> Exactly, before, you still had to deal [48:13] with loose change and bills, right? I [48:18] am very curious about their [48:20] relationship—the four of them—how [48:22] could they...is it because they aren't [48:25] in a big city? Or perhaps they still [48:28] use this approach, like in Ningbo, [48:30] where they might still be following the [48:32] older generation, who were all about [48:34] paying the full bill. Regarding what [48:36] Mr. Ma just said about people skipping [48:38] out on the bill, he was dissatisfied. [48:41] >> But the people I’ve met, who were [48:43] doing very, very well in business back [48:45] in the 90s or even the 2000 s—They [48:48] were always the ones who insisted on [48:50] paying. [48:51] >> Yeah. [48:52] >> They insisted on treating; they [48:53] wouldn't be happy if anyone else tried [48:55] to pick up the tab. [48:55] >> Exactly, I’ve seen more of people [48:57] fighting to pay the bill. [48:58] >> And then what happened? [49:00] >> Some of them eventually hit hard times. [49:02] For instance, this person was used to [49:04] eating out every single day. He had to [49:06] be out every day, and he always [49:07] insisted on paying, but later his [49:09] business suffered, and then his friends [49:11] would treat him to dinner. And I [49:13] discovered that no matter how much you [49:15] treated him, he wasn't happy. Because [49:18] deep down, he wished he had plenty of [49:20] money to treat you all to dinner every [49:22] night. So, that’s also a thing. But [49:26] listening to these young people, the [49:28] 80s and 90s generations, they all say [49:30] they share tables when they eat. I’ve [49:32] noticed that many restaurants in [49:34] Shanghai have shifted. We like a [49:37] private room with a round table, but [49:39] what do these young people like? It’s [49:42] just about eating, so set meals have [49:44] become very popular. And then there’s [49:47] sharing tables. I asked what that meant [49:49] . For example, three guys over here— [49:52] From some company. Then at the other [49:54] side of the table—this is quite [49:55] common in Guangdong—three female [49:57] white-collar workers are eating there, [49:59] and the guys are eating on their side. [50:00] They don’t have those private rooms. [50:03] And if they encounter this, since both [50:06] sides are talking about white-collar [50:09] work issues, like how bad the boss is, [50:11] or whatever, [50:12] >> White-collar workers all talk like that [50:14] . [50:15] >> They all talk about commuting or [50:16] working overtime, that sort of thing. [50:19] >> Once the other party is there, say, [50:21] three guys here or four women over [50:24] there. Both sides start talking more [50:26] interestingly, as if they are letting [50:29] the other side know what they’re [50:31] saying, and the other side gets really [50:33] fired up too. [50:34] >> I don’t really get it. I asked, "What [50:37] is the point of this? Are you hoping to [50:40] , or—" [50:40] >> To make a connection. [50:42] >> Exactly, we don't do that. For us, we [50:45] just chat for a bit and that’s it, we [50:47] pay the bill and leave. I just find [50:49] this younger generation quite unique; [50:52] they use it as a way to vent. [50:53] >> Hmm. [50:54] >> When they hear the other side talking [50:56] about the same thing, they say the same [50:58] stuff and get even more energized. How [50:59] come I feel, Master Ma, that I didn't [51:02] run into you when I was younger? Back [51:04] then, I was the type who would rush to [51:06] pay the bill. A male friend of mine [51:09] once commented on this, saying, "I've [51:11] watched you many times; if you always [51:13] insist on paying, you'll never get [51:15] married." He said, for a woman, you [51:18] know, why? He said when everyone is [51:20] eating together, a woman rushing to pay [51:22] makes the men lose face. [51:24] >> He just felt that I would definitely [51:25] never be able to get married. [51:27] >> Let me tell you, among young people now [51:29] , especially those in big cities and [51:31] particularly in Western society, this [51:33] idea of men paying the bill is actually [51:35] changing. Yes. [51:37] >> Do you understand? There's even a [51:40] feminist scholar in the UK who said [51:42] that men paying the bill is essentially [51:44] a remnant of a discriminatory spirit in [51:47] Western Europe. But, you know, for us [51:50] women, there's this underlying [51:51] implication of treating women as [51:53] objects; are you a slave owner? Are you [51:56] a slave owner? You even object to this; [51:58] however, that is of course a minority [52:01] opinion. Most women, you see, even with [52:03] feminism on the rise today, I've looked [52:05] at the surveys they've conducted. They [52:07] still feel that if a man doesn't pay [52:09] the bill, the woman will be very [52:11] unhappy. Women don't—you don't—but [52:13] do you know that now, some blind dates [52:16] are actually like this, you know? [52:18] >> Hmm. [52:19] >> After the blind date ends, if you don't [52:21] necessarily like each other, [52:23] >> a WeChat message comes over later [52:25] saying, "It was over 500 yuan, how [52:27] about we split it in half?" [52:29] >> And that settles the matter. [52:31] >> And that settles the matter. [52:33] >> It’s also said that among young [52:36] people today, women are usually more [52:38] proactive than men. More generous. [52:41] >> On the contrary, for the post-90s [52:43] generation or whatever, I’ve heard [52:46] examples, like a boy having a chance [52:48] encounter with two girls. After the [52:50] encounter, the prettier girl is still [52:53] waiting for the boy to pursue her, but [52:55] now it's said that boys are all " [52:57] homebodies," lazy, and won't really [52:59] make any effort to contact you. By the [53:02] time she thinks of him a month later [53:04] and feels the boy is actually nice, [53:06] when she reaches out, he says, "I'm [53:08] already seeing your friend, we've [53:09] already started dating." It’s just [53:11] that boys now are increasingly [53:13] unwilling, let alone paying the bill or [53:16] treating people, so this tradition, I [53:18] feel, is reaching a turning point at [53:20] this current stage. Now, some girls [53:22] just say, you really shouldn't hold [53:25] back when dealing with men. For example [53:27] , a boy and a girl might earn about the [53:30] same, and he takes her out to eat; he [53:32] intends to pay, but as an independent [53:34] woman today, she says, "No, no, I'll [53:37] pay." Then he says, "Okay, if you [53:39] insist, you pay." But for people my age [53:42] , we still fight to pay the bill. [53:45] >> In a way, fighting for the bill [53:46] sometimes signifies something—who's [53:49] doing well and who isn't; it’s all [53:51] about "face." Think about it, I [53:53] remember someone told me about a family [53:55] dinner in Beijing. It was the first, [53:58] second, and third uncles, including [54:00] their wives. In the end, the first [54:02] uncle insisted on paying, the second [54:04] uncle grabbed him to stop him because [54:06] he wanted to pay, and then the third [54:08] joined in. The three uncles were [54:10] practically getting into a physical [54:12] scuffle while the three aunts stood by [54:14] yelling, "Put the money down, just put [54:17] it down!" You know, whoever [54:19] successfully managed to pay the bill, [54:22] the relatives would all say, "Oh, look [54:24] at you, you're really doing well." [54:27] It’s all about that kind of social [54:30] standing. Do Shanghainese people care [54:32] about this? [54:33] >> Of course, they do, but in Shanghai, [54:35] people usually agree on things [54:37] beforehand. [54:38] >> They agree in advance. I don't mean [54:40] close friends; close friends might just [54:42] keep a mental note that it’s your [54:44] turn to treat this time and mine the [54:46] next. Unless it's the type of person I [54:48] mentioned who loves to host and gets [54:50] upset if others pay. [54:51] >> True, Shanghainese might not always [54:53] fight over the bill at the table, but [54:55] they definitely remember exactly who [54:57] paid for the meal afterward. I heard [54:59] this growing up—people could remember [55:01] who bought them a meal years ago and [55:03] would insist on paying them back, even [55:05] if they had to bring things from home. [55:07] >> There was a major oversight in what we [55:09] just said; there's a time gap involved. [55:12] The time I mentioned when people didn't [55:14] like to pay was the 1980s, when only a [55:16] few people had the money to treat [55:18] others. Most people were just [55:20] freeloading. [55:21] >> Yeah. [55:22] >> A big meal back then was memorable [55:24] because I remember once we tried to " [55:26] run away" from a bill—we didn't [55:28] actually get away with it, but it was a [55:31] scary experience. [55:32] >> It was for a friend who was about to [55:34] leave for Japan to study. He was flying [55:36] out the next morning, leaving at the [55:38] crack of dawn. That night, he brought [55:40] his girlfriend along to treat everyone [55:43] to the most expensive beef in Beijing [55:45] at the time; we had two or three tables [55:47] , quite the scene. The way that guy was [55:49] dressed, it really left an impression. [55:51] He wore these yellow trousers—can you [55:54] imagine? Bright yellow, with white [55:56] leather shoes, pointed at both ends. [55:58] That was it. [55:59] >> Nanhua Bridge. [56:00] >> Right, he was going abroad, so he [56:02] invited everyone out to eat. By 10 [56:04] o'clock, when it was time to pay the [56:06] bill, he realized he didn't have enough [56:08] money. When he didn't have enough, he [56:10] said he was going home to get it. [56:12] Naturally, no one was going to stop him [56:14] , so he went home to get the cash. The [56:16] problem was that the people at the [56:17] table were happy at first, but then [56:19] they weren't, because they couldn't [56:21] leave. [56:21] >> Maybe it was because everyone felt like [56:23] they were waiting forever, turning what [56:25] started as a joyful scene—into [56:26] something very silent. Very silent. [56:29] That sort of thing, right? You get what [56:31] I mean. Because no one wanted to take [56:32] the fall and pay his bill, so they just [56:33] had to wait for him to return. He got [56:35] back after 11 o'clock. Everyone finally [56:37] breathed a sigh of relief, but the mood [56:39] just couldn't be recovered. [56:40] >> It was just a quick "take care" as they [56:42] sent him off. That was the 80s. [56:45] Fighting to pay the bill became a thing [56:47] in the 90s, after the Reform and [56:49] Opening-up, when people had more money [56:51] to treat others. That’s the key. [56:53] >> Speaking of the most exaggerated case, [56:55] Mr. Ma, your story reminds me of [56:57] something from an interesting book [56:59] called "Dreams of Spring." [57:00] >> Mm. [57:02] >> It tells of the most outrageous example [57:05] of paying a bill. There was a wealthy [57:08] young man in Shanghai named Ye [57:10] Zhongfang, whose father, Ye Chengzong, [57:13] actually founded a middle school in [57:15] Shanghai. [57:18] >> He was a true "rich second generation." [57:23] He once hosted a dinner at the Atlantic [57:25] Restaurant during the dead of winter. [57:31] Back in the late 1920s in Shanghai, [57:34] there was no air conditioning, so [57:36] everyone wore fur coats in that [57:38] freezing weather. He intentionally [57:43] heated the room like a steam bath and [57:45] stood at the door wearing nothing but [57:48] shorts, dressed for summer. He served [57:51] yellow wine laced with ginger and other [57:54] heating ingredients, urging everyone to [57:56] drink up. The stove was so hot that as [57:59] soon as they walked in, everyone hung [58:01] their fur coats by the door. He didn't [58:04] come out until the very end. When he [58:06] finally emerged, he said, "Everyone, I [58:09] am truly sorry." When everyone was [58:12] drinking well and sweating profusely, [58:14] he said, "I have no money today, so [58:17] I've pawned all your fur coats." He [58:20] pawned them, saying he had no choice [58:23] because he was broke. So he just [58:25] grabbed a handful of pawn tickets. [58:28] >> He threw them up into the air and just [58:31] walked away. [58:33] >> After he left, all those people were [58:35] stuck in their undershirts and shorts, [58:37] trying to hail rickshaws, looking [58:39] utterly pathetic while people cursed [58:41] them. [58:42] >> What was the point of that? What was [58:44] the point? Why do something like that? [58:46] >> There were so many oddballs back then. [58:48] >> Just a little stunt, I suppose. [58:50] >> But a day or two later. Since he was [58:53] friends with everyone, a servant would [58:55] show up at each home. Carrying a big [58:58] box. Saying, "I'm sorry, my master [59:01] asked me to buy you a new one." When [59:05] they put it on, it fit perfectly; [59:07] that’s what the wealthy did back then [59:10] , so different from the rich today. [59:12] >> He’d mess with you first, then save [59:15] you in the end. [59:16] >> Right, he was a very strange man who [59:18] often played such pranks, like [59:20] disguising himself as a beggar or [59:22] something else. But in the end, his [59:25] wife divorced him, and later, when the [59:28] Japanese invaded, he joined the Chinese [59:30] Expeditionary Force. [59:32] >> Oh. [59:33] >> He died in Burma. What a strange man he [59:36] was. [59:37] >> That’s the style of the old-timers, [59:39] isn't it? [59:40] >> It’s like the author of "The [59:42] Bureaucracy Exposed," Li Boyuan, who [59:44] wrote a similar anecdote. [59:46] >> He wrote about the Sima Road in [59:48] Shanghai back in the late Qing Dynasty; [59:50] Shanghai already had a Sima Road then. [59:53] It tells of a general, known as the " [59:55] Zhao Yun of the Qing Dynasty," the [59:57] white-clad warrior general. Whenever he [60:00] came into money, he would go to [60:01] Shanghai. Once in Shanghai, he would [60:04] dress up as a beggar and kneel on Sima [60:06] Road. Like people handing out flyers in [60:08] the subway now, he’d watch for girls, [60:10] because there were many women on Sima [60:12] Road, the most fashionable ones. He [60:14] would take a slip of paper and hand one [60:16] out. Every time a girl walked by, he'd [60:19] hand her a slip. After he finished, he [60:22] left. The notes were written concisely: [60:27] anyone who took the slip home and [60:30] opened it would find a piece of gold [60:32] leaf inside. [60:36] >> The implication for the readers is that [60:39] surely many pretty girls threw them [60:41] away on the street or didn't even take [60:44] them. [60:44] >> I imagine only the kind-hearted girls [60:47] would see him kneeling there handing [60:49] them out and decide to take one home. [60:53] >> But why on earth would he do that? [60:57] Later, I read in notes from the Qing [60:59] Dynasty in Beijing that the Eight [61:01] Banners children had this fashion back [61:04] then. [61:05] >> It's not like the rich second [61:06] generation today who buy a Ferrari or [61:08] something; they... [61:09] >> They preferred to hide their wealth. [61:11] >> They would dress as beggars. It was [61:14] somewhere in the western suburbs of [61:16] Beijing; someone curious watched three [61:19] or four beggars from afar, perhaps [61:21] someone like the late Mr. Ma, staring [61:23] to see if there were any flaws. [61:26] Eventually, he noticed that one of the [61:28] beggars had a jade ring on his thumb [61:30] that he couldn't take off. He couldn't [61:33] take it off; it seemed to be the kind [61:35] used for archery in the past. So, he [61:37] kept watching from nearby. By dusk, he [61:40] saw two luxurious horse-drawn carriages [61:43] arrive. There were even eunuchs coming [61:45] out of the carriages to help them [61:47] change. And wash their faces. Then they [61:50] changed into fine silk clothes and [61:53] drove off in a cloud of dust. [61:56] >> But what exactly were these people [61:58] doing? Why this peculiar trend? I've [62:01] seen it in Shanghai too; as I said, [62:04] there were people dressing up as [62:06] beggars well into the 1920s. [62:08] >> It's quite a hobby. [62:10] >> There's a theory that while it's hard [62:11] for the poor to pretend to be rich, [62:13] it's even harder for the rich to [62:15] pretend to be poor; there's a certain [62:16] level of difficulty. If you're wealthy [62:18] and have had a high-level education, [62:20] you don't even look the part when [62:21] you're kneeling there. [62:22] >> You definitely don't look the part; [62:24] trying to make yourself look authentic, [62:26] that beggar-like air, is very difficult [62:28] . This is actually what fascinates me [62:30] more. It's truly eccentric. Some say [62:33] everyone is equal at the dinner table, [62:36] but when it's time to pay the bill, [62:38] everyone’s nerves kick in, you know? [62:40] >> So, wait a minute, I heard about a [62:42] restaurant owner who specifically [62:44] trained his staff—the ones handling [62:46] the bills—saying, "Let me tell you, [62:49] when you go to the private rooms to [62:51] collect the bill, if someone says ' [62:53] check, please,' you stare right at that [62:55] person.""You must identify exactly who [62:57] said they'd pay first, because many [62:59] people just pretend to offer; they [63:00] fight over the bill back and forth." [63:02] >> Usually, those who shout the loudest [63:03] aren't the ones who end up paying. [63:05] >> The boss said, "Don't worry about the [63:06] others; you must lock your eyes on the [63:08] first person who says they'll pay." [63:10] >> Oh, I’ve really heard that. You [63:12] really have to be careful; don't [63:14] pretend to grab the bill. Some [63:16] restaurant cashiers can be quite [63:18] mischievous. When two people are [63:20] fighting to hand over their credit [63:22] cards, they might just take the one [63:24] from the person who was merely putting [63:27] on a show, just to catch them off guard [63:29] . I once had an interesting idea to [63:32] write a book, because when we were [63:33] young, we read books like "Twenty Years [63:36] of Witnessing Strange Events." [63:37] >> I originally wanted to write a book [63:39] called "The Chronicles of Dining." [63:41] >> About all the strange meals I've had [63:42] over the years. Right, you've been to [63:44] many meals, [63:44] >> what other strange things have you [63:46] eaten? [63:46] >> The strange meals here in Beijing, you [63:48] wouldn't even believe it. [63:50] >> A friend from Hong Kong came to me and [63:51] said, "I need a favor." I asked, "What [63:53] is it?" [63:54] >> Hmm. [63:55] >> He said, "I owe a debt of gratitude, [63:56] and I have to eat at someone's place. [63:58] Come with me, and we'll settle the debt [64:00] ." [64:00] >> I asked, "Why do I need to go?" He said [64:03] , "Well, I don't know many people in [64:05] Beijing, so if we can just scrape [64:07] together a table, we can go eat and [64:08] I'll clear the debt." This place wasn't [64:10] even open to the public, you know? I [64:13] invited a few other people, but it was [64:15] a huge hassle; finally, we got six of [64:18] us together to go eat there. It was [64:21] very inconspicuous. Once we got inside, [64:24] I was stunned. How did they expect us [64:27] to eat? The six of us were dining in [64:29] the main hall. Each person was given a [64:31] table and a chair. The six of us were [64:34] all separated, far from each other. My [64:36] legs were dangling off this huge chair, [64:38] just like in a kindergarten. [64:40] >> Then the tables... [64:41] >> With six people, I asked, "Are we [64:42] eating here?" You said, "Dining." [64:44] >> Hmm. I said, "We can't eat like this. [64:47] What kind of debt repayment is this? I [64:49] can't stand it." [64:50] >> Later I said, "This is impossible, [64:52] because we have to shout across the [64:53] tables." [64:54] >> I said, "Let's change." So, we moved to [64:57] another spot. We switched to a big [64:59] table, but the chairs were also [65:00] oversized, my feet couldn't reach the [65:02] floor. After we finished, the boss came [65:04] over, saw me, and said, "Oh, Mr. Ma is [65:06] here! It's on the house." That meal was [65:08] incredibly expensive, you know? He even [65:10] did this... [65:11] >> He called it a treat. [65:12] >> It turned out to be Mr. Ma. [65:14] >> As a result, I didn't pay the debt, and [65:16] they even waived the bill. [65:17] >> So there's a famous assertion here in [65:19] Beijing: the mystery of Chinese culture [65:21] lies in the "fanju"(dining gatherings). [65:23] >> The dining gathering is the ultimate [65:25] endgame. [65:26] >> Our social lives are all dining [65:27] gatherings; we eat whether there's an [65:29] occasion or not. Actually, most private [65:31] homes didn't host guests back then; I [65:33] remember this was the late 90s. Once [65:35] you’ve renovated your house and have [65:37] a fancy living room, you stop hosting [65:39] guests at home, and everything is done [65:40] by eating out. [65:41] >> Right. [65:43] >> So, I was talking to a friend of mine [65:45] who runs a restaurant, and I said the [65:47] most fascinating things actually happen [65:50] during dinner parties. The most [65:53] interesting content is like us four [65:55] chatting here; if you look at what [65:57] people are really talking about at [65:59] these dinners, you can uncover the [66:01] city's most charming secrets. That's [66:04] true. [66:05] >> All sorts of different topics are saved [66:07] up specifically to be discussed at the [66:09] dinner table. [66:09] >> Mm. [66:11] >> And I've noticed that at every meal, [66:13] everyone is mentally drafting their own [66:15] stories. Like us right now, while Ma Ye [66:17] is speaking, I'm already thinking about [66:19] what I’m going to say next. [66:21] >> Oh. [66:22] >> This might be a Chinese habit, this [66:24] need for everyone to sit around a round [66:26] table. I'm not talking about how young [66:28] people might just sit at shared tables [66:30] now; that lacks this specific aura. [66:32] Having a round table is like having a [66:35] story-telling session. [66:36] >> Exactly, and there’s always a [66:38] distribution of roles. [66:40] >> I often told a friend of mine who loves [66:42] hosting house parties—I went a few [66:43] times and asked, "Why is it that every [66:45] time I walk into your party, there's [66:47] always an Aquarius man there?" What [66:49] does that mean? It means there's always [66:51] one person holding court while everyone [66:53] else listens. [66:53] >> Aquarius people are like that. [66:55] >> Sorry, you're not one. [66:57] >> I'm not, I'm not, I challenged Ma [66:59] Ye’s point. I’m just joking, but [67:01] there's always one person who talks a [67:04] lot, constantly sharing their own [67:06] stories while others listen, then a few [67:08] people chiming in, and someone acting [67:11] like a secretary or organizer to manage [67:13] all the details. I've found that this [67:15] division of roles happens automatically [67:18] at the dinner table. The other day, I [67:20] saw a foreign dating site—they don't [67:22] call it matchmaking, they call it [67:24] dating—saying that young people today [67:27] are really different from our [67:29] generation. It gets to the point where, [67:32] on a dating app, they agree to meet up. [67:34] After they meet, the guy looks around [67:37] and suggests, "How about we share a [67:39] hamburger?" And so they get a burger. [67:45] When it arrives, the guy cuts it in two [67:47] , looks at both pieces, takes the [67:50] larger one for himself, and in the end, [67:52] they split the bill. The punchline of [67:56] this joke is...You see, Western-style " [67:58] go Dutch" has its own logic. [68:00] >> Right. [68:01] >> It's based on individual portions. [68:04] >> Everyone has their own, so it's easy to [68:06] split. Chinese people actually can't [68:08] really split things that way. Since [68:10] you've lived abroad, do you think [68:12] foreigners really "go Dutch" or even [68:14] split the bill down to the cent? [68:16] >> Not at all. I think it depends on the [68:19] person. But sometimes, you'll find that [68:21] if you insist on paying the bill, they [68:23] get really surprised. For instance, a [68:26] while ago in the UK, I was with a few [68:28] friends—we were former classmates, so [68:30] we were pretty close. We went to a [68:32] museum, then had some coffee, which [68:34] really didn't cost much. When it was [68:36] time to pay, one of them asked me, "Can [68:39] you expense this?" I said, "No." Then I [68:41] thought, it’s not much money anyway; [68:44] a cup of coffee is just a few pounds, [68:46] so I just paid for it. I didn't want to [68:48] deal with splitting it on my credit [68:50] card. The other girl was really [68:52] surprised. She was very grateful, of [68:54] course, but the level of gratitude made [68:56] it feel like I’d treated her to a [68:58] fancy feast. She kept thanking me, and [69:00] I thought, "It's not that deep, it's [69:02] just a few pounds." But sometimes, we [69:04] Chinese people talk a lot about "mianzi [69:06] "—face. Well, they’ve even added [69:08] the term "save face" to English now, [69:10] but that’s a very Chinese expression. [69:13] They say if a foreigner has lived in [69:15] China, they’ll understand what you [69:17] mean by "saving face." But I don’t [69:19] think they generally see it that way. [69:21] To them, "face" just means respect. As [69:24] long as you show them enough respect, [69:26] that’s enough. It’s not like our [69:28] concept of face, which is divided into [69:30] so many nuances—like what counts as " [69:32] face" and what doesn't. And there's " [69:34] guang"—having face isn't enough, you [69:36] need "guang" too. [69:37] >> How do you interpret "guang"? [69:39] >> It means others can see it; making it [69:41] visible to others. [69:42] >> Ah, there's another aspect of "face"— [69:45] whether things are kept equal. For [69:47] example, if you give me a 300-yuan gift [69:49] or treat me to a 300-yuan meal, I feel [69:52] like I need to pay back a little more. [69:54] That’s what the Japanese mean when [69:56] they say "don't cause others trouble," [69:57] right? That’s why Japanese people [69:59] usually give very small gifts, which I [70:01] think is very correct. [70:02] >> They also have that kind of "table full [70:04] of food" culture. [70:05] >> It's all about making you feel that the [70:08] gift is very valuable or that the meal [70:10] you provided was excellent. It's not [70:12] just about who pays the bill; it's more [70:14] like everyone there is just completely [70:17] stunned by the whole experience. [70:19] >> Yeah, exactly, kind of taken aback. [70:22] >> There’s also another point to this. [70:24] >> Back in the day, some people just loved [70:26] hosting dinner parties; it was their [70:28] way of socializing. Right. [70:30] >> There was this one extremely famous [70:32] place in Beijing. [70:33] >> Whose place? [70:35] >> They operated right out of their home, [70:37] inside an old dormitory building. [70:38] >> They bought two large units and knocked [70:40] the wall down to connect them. Their [70:42] kitchen likely extended into other [70:44] rooms too—it was a full-scale [70:46] commercial kitchen with three or four [70:48] chefs working away. They ran a "rolling [70:51] " service, like an assembly line. It [70:53] was constant rotation, with tables [70:54] pushed together, big tables nested with [70:56] small ones—it was just an irregular [70:58] mess of tables. Since I was actually [71:00] pretty close with the owner, but had [71:02] never eaten there, he invited me [71:04] repeatedly, so I finally went. I [71:06] figured if you’re inviting me to [71:08] dinner, it’d be a small group where [71:10] we could actually talk. But at his [71:12] place, strangers just kept walking in; [71:13] you’d be mid-meal and new people [71:15] would show up. [71:16] >> I think I know who you’re talking [71:18] about. [71:18] >> Yeah, it’s very famous, and they kept [71:20] having to add more chairs. And how far [71:23] did they take the chair-adding? To the [71:25] point where, even if you didn't know [71:26] the person next to you, you had to [71:28] share a bench because there were just [71:29] too many people. After we finished and [71:31] left, they asked what I thought. I said [71:33] the only thing I could say was that [71:35] I’d never eaten a meal like that, [71:36] sitting completely sideways the whole [71:38] time because it was so crowded. They [71:40] squeezed twenty sets of chopsticks onto [71:42] a table meant for ten. I told them, " [71:43] I’ve been eating like this from start [71:45] to finish. If I don't turn sideways, I [71:46] don't have enough room." [71:47] >> Left-handed or right-handed, you just [71:50] had to sit sideways. From the moment I [71:52] arrived until I left, they just kept [71:55] bringing out dishes. You’d finish a [71:57] dish, you’d leave, and then the next [71:59] group would come in to eat that same [72:01] revolving menu. [72:02] >> It was a very famous "assembly line" in [72:04] Beijing. Heard they moved later on. [72:07] >> What kind of thrill do you think these [72:09] people get from that? [72:10] >> I really don't know. Back then, because [72:12] it was a dormitory building...When you [72:14] walked into the hallway by their door, [72:16] there were stacks of those 24-bottle [72:17] beer crates piled higher than in any [72:19] actual restaurant. They just loved it. [72:21] They were pouring money into it. [72:23] >> Right. [72:24] >> No one pays, everything there is free, [72:26] it’s just lively. And at this table, [72:28] from the moment you arrive, people are [72:30] already eating. No matter what time you [72:32] walk in, they’re eating, and when you [72:33] leave, there are still new people [72:35] arriving. That’s how it is. It’s [72:37] like the retainers people used to have [72:38] in the past, right? The retainers were [72:40] on my tab, yes, I just have that [72:41] feeling of being the host. [72:42] >> This is typical of a revolving-door [72:43] banquet, yes. [72:44] >> Yes. [72:45] >> He feels this gives him face. [72:47] >> It gives him face, does it? [72:48] >> You think Shanghainese people would be [72:49] willing to take such a loss? [72:50] >> There are some, there are. Just like [72:53] what Master Ma said, this kind of [72:55] situation exists. I know a friend whose [72:57] home is exactly like this. Their home [73:00] has hot meals ready 24 hours a day, and [73:02] people can come in to eat at any time. [73:05] Ah, is it not the same as what the [73:07] master said? Is it not also possibly [73:10] due to work reasons? For example, some [73:12] people might arrive at 11 o'clock at [73:14] night or something like that. Well, I [73:16] recently heard Zhan Zhi, that person [73:19] from Taiwan, tell a story that was [73:21] quite similar to this. [73:23] >> Oh, it was really touching when he [73:24] talked about his wife, since she passed [73:26] away, you know. Yes, yes, yes. [73:29] >> He shared an anecdote about his wife, [73:31] saying that at the time, Zhan Zhi was [73:33] the only one who ran a company. People [73:35] like Lo Ta-yu and Edward Yang were all [73:38] involved in making movies back then. [73:41] Since they didn't have companies, they [73:44] would ask Zhan Zhi to step in. [73:46] >> Yes. [73:47] >> This group of people would even knock [73:49] on their door at three or four in the [73:51] morning. [73:51] >> Ah. [73:52] >> As soon as they knocked on the door. [73:54] His wife would open the door and her [73:56] first sentence would be, "Have you [73:57] eaten yet?" His wife would immediately [74:00] make food. I said a wife like that is [74:01] truly impossible to find even with a [74:03] lantern. It's two or three in the [74:05] morning and he hasn't even gotten out [74:06] of bed, but his wife is already up. His [74:08] wife was a very famous gourmet in [74:10] Taiwan, you know. [74:11] >> Oh, so that’s why everyone was [74:12] willing to go and eat there. [74:14] >> She passed away suddenly a few years [74:16] ago. Afterward, he hosted a dinner in [74:18] Shanghai featuring her recipes. Also in [74:21] Hangzhou. [74:22] >> Yes, he invited me that time in [74:23] Hangzhou, but because I was recording [74:25] our show, I couldn't enjoy it. It's [74:26] just that his home became a place where [74:28] people could drop by to eat at any time [74:30] , and his wife would get up to cook for [74:31] them. That’s how it was. [74:33] >> Well, for her to do everything herself [74:34] is really rare. I thought they had a [74:36] chef at home. [74:37] >> Actually, in the Middle East, there are [74:38] many situations where the "face" [74:39] associated with dining is even more [74:40] intimidating. For instance, if they are [74:42] going to host you for dinner, you have [74:43] to arrive in the morning. That’s too [74:45] much. [74:46] >> Spending a whole day at someone's place [74:47] , it's not just about the meal itself [74:49] —beyond the food being a gesture of [74:51] respect, it's the time you spend that [74:53] really shows you care. You have to head [74:55] over in the morning; even if there’s [74:57] nothing to talk about, you have to go [74:58] and just watch TV with them. Then, [75:00] after you’ve finished eating, you [75:01] have to say goodbye at least three [75:03] times. You have to insist on leaving [75:04] until they finally say, "No, no, you [75:06] can't go yet, stay a bit longer," [75:07] because that’s the way to show you're [75:08] valued. [75:09] >> I just feel that this kind of... [75:10] >> Chinese people, you see, ask "Have you [75:12] eaten?" the moment they meet. Eating is [75:15] always on our lips. Think back to the [75:18] 70s during the rationing era; many [75:20] families had to save for months just to [75:22] gather enough food for a New Year's [75:24] meal. [75:24] >> Exactly. [75:26] >> Right? It’s arguably the most [75:28] important aspect of our culture; this [75:30] is truly our Chinese culture. [75:32] >> Moreover, the hosts who organize these [75:35] gatherings, I think they are a very [75:37] unique breed. I have friends like this, [75:40] and I truly admire them, because like [75:42] you said, it’s like a flowing stream. [75:46] >> Later, I imagined it; in reality, their [75:49] house is never empty. [75:50] >> Right. [75:51] >> This immense social ability—if you [75:54] were a homebody like me, my god, I’d [75:56] have a mental breakdown. But they just [75:58] keep going, and you might find that [76:00] this family...well, they are the [76:02] renowned figures of Hangzhou. Whether [76:04] they are celebrities from Shanghai or a [76:06] specific circle in Beijing, whoever [76:08] brings friends over knows to take them [76:10] to their house. [76:11] >> And they just sit there, chatting away. [76:14] Of course, you can interpret it from a [76:16] practical standpoint—the network they [76:19] build is incredible, right? But from [76:21] another perspective, I think this is [76:24] just who they are. It’s that they get [76:26] a kick out of it. [76:27] >> It gives them immense psychological [76:28] satisfaction. Right, but to us, it’s [76:31] torture. I mean, from the morning on, [76:32] you have to be dressed, at least [76:34] dressed properly, right? [76:35] >> People just keep coming, wave after [76:37] wave, group after group. [76:38] >> Especially when they become very famous [76:40] , the stream of people never ends; [76:42] it’s all strangers. [76:43] >> Exactly, all strangers, yeah. [76:45] >> Sometimes at the beginning, they’d [76:47] introduce this person or that person, [76:49] but later on, nobody knows anyone, so [76:50] they don’t even bother with [76:52] introductions anymore. Once everyone [76:54] finishes and leaves, they’re all very [76:56] happy. It reminds me of what you [76:58] mentioned; I’ve found that some [77:00] people—for instance, there’s an [77:01] American artist named Andy Warhol, [77:03] whose work sells for hundreds of [77:05] millions now. In the end, he just had [77:08] this big loft. In the end, you just [77:12] felt that every drifter in New York, [77:14] street homeless, people with mental [77:16] illnesses, all sorts of people were [77:19] going there to eat and drink. It was [77:22] obviously related to the art he was [77:23] working on, so it was acceptable. [77:25] >> No, he even filmed them. [77:28] >> He just filmed them, which is why some [77:30] later said he was exploiting these more [77:32] vulnerable people. He didn't care; [77:34] you’d always see all sorts of chaotic [77:37] , eccentric characters there. Everyone [77:39] knew his place was like a big workshop, [77:42] so they all came. He kept filming until [77:45] an incident happened; he was filming a [77:47] woman on the street, and in the end, [77:49] she fired a shot. [77:51] >> Hmm. [77:52] >> She was just seriously injured, that [77:54] kind of thing happened. [77:55] >> There was an American writer named Jack [77:58] London. After he became successful, [78:00] didn't he build a huge estate in the US [78:03] , called Wolf House or something? He [78:05] brought together everyone who could [78:08] write, whether he knew them or not. It [78:10] was his most glorious era. [78:12] >> He liked giant projects. [78:15] >> Then it eventually caught fire and [78:17] burned down. The whole estate was [78:19] destroyed. The only place where this [78:21] culture is preserved now is at rural [78:24] funerals; they have revolving feasts. [78:26] >> Rural funerals still view a large [78:28] turnout as a point of honor. If [78:30] someone’s elder passes away, they [78:32] hold a three-day feast. The further [78:34] away people travel from, the more [78:35] honored they are. It’s not about your [78:37] status; if you traveled 50 miles to eat [78:39] this meal, you are a guest of honor. [78:41] >> Don't weddings have that? Weddings? [78:43] >> Weddings don't. Chinese people [78:44] definitely value the dead more than the [78:46] living; for the living... [78:47] >> Weddings have food too, but they don't [78:49] have revolving feasts. Only funerals [78:51] have those. Weddings are just one meal [78:53] and it's over. For deaths, it’s [78:55] normal in the countryside to eat for [78:56] three days. Wealthy families have [78:58] people eating from morning till night [78:59] for three days. Then there's the [79:01] funeral culture—the musicians playing [79:03] and singing. Now there are opera [79:05] performers and everything else. It’s [79:06] loud enough to blow your voice out. You [79:09] ... [79:09] >> Call it a gathering, but it’s [79:11] actually a... [79:12] >> If you are very famous or wealthy, [79:14] people from miles around all come over [79:16] to have a meal. So the question is, who [79:18] always ends up picking up the tab? For [79:21] example, it makes me wonder, regarding [79:23] these weddings in Shanghai you [79:25] mentioned... [79:27] >> Are they actually making money or [79:29] losing money? [79:30] >> That really depends, but I generally [79:33] hear that people don't hold them for [79:35] second marriages. For second marriages, [79:37] they just keep it low-key, without any [79:40] invitations. [79:40] >> They say that nowadays in Shanghai, [79:42] those red envelopes have to be at least [79:43] a thousand. Yeah, that's the starting [79:45] point. [79:45] >> I guess so. [79:46] >> For me, it's more than a thousand. [79:48] >> A thousand barely covers the cost of [79:49] the meal. [79:50] >> People say the red envelopes in [79:51] Guangdong are really small, just... [79:53] >> Very small. Why are the ones in [79:55] Shanghai so big? It might be a [79:58] historical thing. Like, if I gave you [80:00] one three years ago. [80:01] >> Right, and now you have to add a little [80:03] bit more, exactly, you have to add more [80:05] . [80:05] >> That's how it keeps increasing. It's [80:07] because everyone keeps track; some [80:09] older folks even keep ledgers at home [80:10] for these favors. Oh, the pressure of [80:13] these social debts! What do Shanghai [80:15] mothers-in-law say? After the wedding [80:17] banquet is all over, they look at the [80:18] exhausted bride and groom and tell them [80:20] , "Make sure you count all the red [80:21] envelopes before you go to sleep [80:23] tonight." [80:23] >> They have to turn everything over to [80:25] them. [80:26] >> Some do it because they have debts to [80:28] pay off. [80:29] >> Right, because previously, for example, [80:31] if they owed others or others owed them [80:33] these favors, it all has to be [80:35] reconciled. It's so tedious, so much [80:38] trouble. [80:38] >> It is a hassle, it really is, because [80:41] this is linked to people who lived [80:43] through the experiences of the 60s and [80:45] 70s. [80:46] >> That's how these things happen. I [80:48] believe this will disappear in the [80:49] future because the parents of this [80:51] generation all lived through the 60s [80:52] and 70s, which were...... [80:54] >> times of very, very tight living. [80:56] >> I feel like that kind of social [80:57] obligation is just a burden, that [80:59] desire to save face. I just think, [81:00] what's the point of living your whole [81:02] life just keeping accounts for others? [81:04] >> Exactly, exactly. Yes, and that's why I [81:07] find many of the customs that still [81:09] exist in Shanghai today so hard to [81:11] understand. Supposedly, Shanghai people [81:13] are the most practical, right? But, [81:16] this is what's really interesting. For [81:18] example, if you buy a ring, the auntie [81:20] next door might come over and say, "Is [81:22] this only 81 points?""It's still a bit [81:25] small. When our daughter gets married, [81:27] it's better to have at least a carat." [81:30] Then they say, "There's a standard for [81:32] these things, you have to follow it." [81:34] Sometimes I wonder, for people like us [81:35] who are a bit wild, what if I just [81:37] don't have a wedding? Is that okay? Why [81:40] wouldn't you? What kind of impact would [81:42] not having one have on their [81:43] surrounding society? [81:44] >> Whether you hold one or not depends on [81:46] your relationship with your mother, [81:48] right? [81:48] >> In some families, children don't listen [81:50] to their parents, so they can [81:51] absolutely choose not to hold one, but [81:53] in many, many cases, the children are [81:55] controlled by their parents. You can't [81:57] really say the head of the family is [81:59] bad; they attend so many weddings for [82:01] relatives and give out so many red [82:03] envelopes. [82:04] >> Right? And also [82:06] >> Yeah, no more chances. [82:08] >> Shanghainese people are usually very [82:10] calculating, but they aren't clear on [82:12] this part. [82:13] >> Do you know what I mean? It's just that [82:15] they all live the same kind of life. [82:17] You know, my impression of the Shanghai [82:20] Bund—of course, they say locals don't [82:22] visit the Bund—but every time I go, I [82:25] always see a bunch of white dresses, [82:27] brides in white wedding gowns running [82:29] onto the grass. [82:30] >> Taking photos, that is. [82:32] >> Why does everyone have to be so [82:34] identical? [82:35] >> How should I put this? These people [82:38] aren't necessarily true Shanghainese; [82:40] they could very well be "new [82:42] Shanghainese." It’s like they want to [82:44] show their hometown folks, "I got [82:47] married on the Bund," because there's [82:49] nowhere else in the city to take photos [82:51] . Just like in Russia, places like [82:55] Moscow's Red Square, it’s become a [82:57] habit now. My generation didn't have [83:00] any of this—no wedding gowns, no [83:02] photos, nothing. [83:03] >> There are a few spots now, like the [83:05] Badaguan in Qingdao. [83:06] >> Or Gulangyu in Xiamen. When I used to [83:10] go to Gulangyu all the time, I’d see [83:12] those wedding photos. Oh my, one photo [83:15] shocked me. The woman—I saw her from [83:18] the front and she was beautiful, but [83:20] when she turned around, her back was [83:23] covered in these angry red welts, like [83:25] a leopard print. It was so intense. [83:28] Because she was wearing a backless [83:30] dress? [83:30] >> Yeah, she was anxious too. You see, [83:32] they think the wedding dress is so [83:34] beautiful, they don't care how much [83:35] they suffer. Right, exactly. [83:37] >> Actually, Shanghainese people are very [83:39] practical on one hand—well, not just [83:40] Shanghainese—but on the other, they [83:41] are very concerned about "face." [83:42] >> They are being extremely practical and [83:44] calculating while doing something very [83:46] impractical. [83:47] >> Why is that? It’s really about what [83:50] you’d call a "social code" in English [83:52] ; it's a set of social rules, where if [83:54] you don't follow them, people will talk [83:57] about you. You feel like you’re [83:59] living within a web of social codes. I [84:01] remember when I was young, maybe in the [84:03] 80s or 90s, when it first became a [84:05] trend for people to have a "travel [84:06] wedding" instead of holding a banquet, [84:08] they would just go on a trip. I would [84:10] hear the adults whispering behind their [84:11] backs, "Oh, they didn't even hold a [84:13] banquet.""If you don't do it, people [84:14] will criticize you." Actually, [84:16] Shanghainese are very concerned about [84:18] what people say behind their backs, [84:20] which is exhausting. What Wentao said [84:22] earlier seems to generally reflect the [84:25] situation in Shanghai, but on an [84:27] individual level, everyone is different [84:30] . [84:30] >> Some people aren't so particular; I was [84:33] just thinking that some people would [84:35] just handle it quietly. [84:37] >> Or perhaps we assume Shanghainese are [84:39] like that, but there are all sorts of [84:42] possibilities. So, speaking of dinner [84:45] parties, let me share an anecdote I [84:48] read in a book. I feel we have this set [84:52] perception of someone as a "bad person, [84:55] " or someone with a very clear label. [84:58] There was a woman who later married Wu [85:01] Shibao, named She Aizhen. In the old [85:04] Shanghai dialect, they called her a "ba [85:06] ningshuo," which is basically a female [85:09] gangster. It’s said her marksmanship [85:13] was incredible, she could hit a target [85:15] from a hundred paces, and she later [85:17] married... [85:18] >> Someone from No. 76, who was it? He [85:22] started out as a driver and was later [85:24] assassinated by the Japanese. He was [85:27] considered a traitor, and at that time, [85:29] was it... [85:30] >> Right, Wu Shibao. During the "Isolated [85:34] Island" period, the relationship [85:36] between No. 76 and the KMT was [85:38] extremely tense, especially involving [85:41] the banks. If I killed one of yours [85:43] today, you would definitely kill one of [85:46] ours tomorrow. Both sides carried out [85:49] assassinations at dinner parties. They [85:52] would be dining, and there's this story [85:54] that they were about to carry out an [85:56] operation. They were in a private room, [86:00] and She Aizhen said she wasn't at ease. [86:04] She said, "Before you carry out the [86:06] action later, I want to go in and take [86:08] a look." Her subordinates took her in [86:10] to have a look. In the private room— [86:13] I’m imagining the scene—the curtain [86:15] was pulled back, and she saw a group of [86:17] people sitting inside. The person [86:20] facing the door had someone whisper in [86:22] his ear that the man in the middle was [86:24] the deputy bank manager and they would [86:27] kill him later during the operation. [86:30] Then She Aizhen said something very [86:33] unique; she said this guy was too [86:36] handsome. "Killing him seems like a [86:39] waste, let's swap for that old guy with [86:42] a mustache on the side.""We'll kill [86:45] this one instead." [86:46] >> So, my impression of She Aizhen is [86:49] generally that she was ruthless, but on [86:52] this one point...... [86:54] >> it was still all about looks. [86:56] >> It turned out that five minutes after [86:58] he turned and left, the gunman came in, [87:01] aimed at the door, and shot a man with [87:03] pockmarks—he died so unjustly. [87:05] >> Just because I have pockmarks? What? [87:08] >> Because the guy next to him was [87:09] handsome. Yes, that's the scenario I'm [87:11] talking about. [87:12] >> When things like this happen. It all [87:13] depends on your appearance. Don't [87:15] Shanghainese love to talk about " [87:16] maixiang"? [87:17] >> Can a good appearance save your life? [87:19] Shanghainese love using this term " [87:21] maixiang"—how should one understand [87:23] it? [87:23] >> For example, I see you seem [87:24] particularly familiar with Shanghainese [87:26] people; have you dated a Shanghainese [87:27] girlfriend in the past? [87:28] >> I wanted to, I really did, but they [87:30] didn't fancy me—they just felt it [87:32] wasn't possible. Your "maixiang" is [87:34] actually very good. [87:35] >> My "maixiang"? [87:36] >> Very good. Very good, you have a good [87:39] appearance. [87:39] >> It's too late even if it's good now. I [87:41] wouldn't say that. [87:43] >> Look, you have a good friend named Mao; [87:45] I saw Mao write an article about Jin, [87:48] saying he's a typical "lao kela." [87:50] >> I personally don't quite like that term [87:53] . These so-called "lao kela" and such [87:55] —that covers a very broad range. It [87:57] just means older Shanghainese people. [88:00] >> It's "classic," derived from that word, [88:02] meaning very classic, like they have a [88:04] classic old-school style. What about [88:06] the term "xiaokai" in Shanghainese? [88:09] What does that mean? " [88:10] >> Xiaokai" is just...well, it's a wealthy [88:13] kid. It means his father is definitely [88:16] a boss, very rich, but the most [88:17] important thing about a "xiaokai" is [88:20] that he doesn't know how to do anything [88:22] and doesn't get involved. [88:23] >> No. [88:24] >> He’s a hands-off manager, that’s it [88:26] . [88:26] >> And what about "baixiang"? " [88:28] >> Baixiang" means to hang out, just to [88:30] play. [88:30] >> You have to dress up with a good [88:31] appearance before you go out to play. [88:33] You know what I want to say? The [88:34] beginning of his novel, "Blossoms [88:36] Shanghai," mentions Wong Kar-wai's " [88:38] Days of Being Wild."" [88:40] >> Days of Being Wild." [88:42] >> It’s when you watch Tony Leung... [88:45] >> At the end, combing his hair, counting [88:47] two banknotes, dressing meticulously, [88:50] and heading out. He said that [88:52] half-minute was the essence of Shanghai [88:54] . [88:54] >> There are quite a few people like this [88:56] in Shanghai, coming out to play cards [88:57] in the middle of the night. Sleeping [88:59] during the day; there is a segment of [89:01] the population that actually lives like [89:03] this, even living a life from the [89:04] Republican era. They... [89:06] >> But where does their income come from? [89:08] >> They just rely on this, on this... " [89:10] >> Dakai"(gambling/playing). [89:11] >> They might have some money at home, or [89:13] their lives are really living on the [89:15] edge. But it’s a very distinct [89:17] Shanghai flavor. You see, there were [89:20] places in Shanghai—of course, they've [89:23] all been torn down now—like Tilanqiao [89:26] , Caohejing, or Shiliupu. Those areas [89:29] were a mix of everything, naturally [89:32] forming into these urban sub-centers. [89:35] In these sub-centers, you had people [89:37] with all sorts of experiences, [89:39] especially before 1949. People from all [89:42] kinds of backgrounds, they still [89:44] maintained that certain way of life. [89:46] Some old men would still be drinking [89:48] coffee, doing their own thing; even [89:50] putting out a biscuit had to be just so [89:52] —it was all an accumulation of the [89:55] past. Within that ecosystem, all kinds [89:57] of people relied on all sorts of ways [89:59] to make a living. [90:00] >> Since I bought quite a few antiques in [90:02] Shanghai, I encountered all sorts of [90:03] different characters while shopping for [90:05] them. [90:06] >> They are different from Beijingers; [90:07] Shanghainese are very good at what you [90:09] call "testing the waters." If something [90:11] doesn't work, I'll step back. How can I [90:13] make this deal happen? For example, one [90:15] year I saw a Huanghuali bed that I [90:17] liked so much, I couldn't get enough of [90:19] it. [90:19] >> In my heart, I felt that at the time, [90:21] it was worth 800,000, which was already [90:23] a lot. [90:24] >> So I wanted to buy it and pursued the [90:26] owner. This owner wasn't in the antique [90:28] business; he was in the bathhouse [90:30] business, but...... [90:31] >> after he made money, he would always [90:33] buy these kinds of things. He had all [90:34] sorts of "brothers" helping him acquire [90:36] them. And so, even though I thought it [90:38] was worth 800,000, if you are really [90:39] sincere about buying something, you [90:41] have to offer more, right? I was [90:42] hell-bent on buying it, but he wouldn't [90:44] sell. He said he’d never sell it in [90:46] his lifetime. So, in order to get him [90:48] to sell it, I gritted my teeth and [90:50] offered an amount I thought wasn't [90:52] worth it—it was way too expensive—I [90:54] said I could pay 1.2 million for it. He [90:56] didn't even think about it and kicked [90:58] me out, saying, "Not a chance, that's [91:00] impossible." He said, "I have people [91:02] coming here to take baths," and so on. [91:04] The matter of that bed stayed on my [91:05] mind, so I kept asking. Two years later [91:08] , [91:08] >> someone close to him called me and said [91:10] he wanted to sell the bed. [91:11] >> When he told me, I called him and asked [91:13] , "Why?" He said, "Oh, his wife is [91:14] having a baby, and he’s out of money [91:16] now." [91:16] >> Hmm. [91:17] >> His wife is having a baby. So, I was [91:19] very proactive and gave him a call. I [91:22] said, "Hey, I heard you want to sell [91:23] that bed?" [91:24] >> He said, "Sell? How much are you paying [91:27] ?" I asked, "How much? Didn't I offer [91:29] you 1.2 million before?" You see, these [91:31] antiques, they don't have a fixed price [91:34] . [91:34] >> That price is completely arbitrary; [91:36] it’s not like the standard market [91:37] price per kilogram. [91:39] >> I said this. I said I’d offer 120, [91:42] right? He said yes. I said if I offer [91:45] you 600,000, are you going to keep [91:47] haggling? I’m chasing you with all [91:48] this money and you still won’t sell [91:50] to me? I’m being so sincere, taking [91:52] you out to eat, and you just take me to [91:53] the bathhouse and still refuse to sell. [91:55] So, I tell him, I’ll give you 600,000 [91:57] . If you don't haggle, it’s 600,000 [91:59] minus 10,000—that's 590,000. If you [92:01] agree, the money will be in your [92:03] account in one minute. [92:04] >> Mm. [92:05] >> He didn’t stutter or hesitate at all; [92:07] he didn't bargain with me, just said [92:09] okay. [92:10] >> His straightforwardness completely [92:12] caught me off guard, because I assumed [92:14] he would haggle and drag things out [92:16] with me. [92:17] >> Dragging it out—at the time, I still [92:20] thought I could pay the 800,000, but [92:22] his "okay" left me stunned. Then I [92:25] quickly paid the money, but after [92:27] paying, I felt uneasy. Why? He was too [92:30] quick about it, and I couldn't be slow. [92:32] After I paid, I sent someone the next [92:33] day, because I was in Beijing at the [92:35] time. I told him, "You can't do [92:37] anything else today, just go and move [92:39] my bed away." Because I was afraid he [92:40] might sell it cheaper, or sell it again [92:42] —if he sells it twice, then the bed [92:44] is gone, right? Because I’m someone [92:45] who gets really anxious about money. [92:47] >> Whatever happens after is hard to say. [92:49] So look, I have a friend from Taiwan [92:52] who has lived in Shanghai for a long [92:54] time. He said, "Look at my driver, [92:57] it’s interesting," he said, "if you [92:59] give him a little tip..." [93:01] >> Shanghainese people are very aware of [93:03] the benefits in this. They place great [93:05] importance on this kind of benefit. Hmm [93:07] . [93:07] >> I think Shanghainese people are indeed [93:09] very concerned about "face." It’s [93:11] like when you go out, when you leave [93:13] your house, apart from wearing pajamas, [93:15] I think everyone has a very high degree [93:17] of consensus on this matter of "face." [93:19] And this, I remember when I was a kid, [93:21] even back then when nobody had much [93:24] money, we had this neighbor who knew [93:26] how to sew clothes. She’d find [93:28] designs for foreign-style outfits in [93:31] various magazines, and even with cheap [93:33] fabric, she’d stitch them all [93:35] together. Dressing up and looking sharp [93:38] was really important. Take for example [93:41] the articles I read by Klin, he wrote [93:43] about how in Shanghai, when you went to [93:45] a bathhouse, the attendant who took [93:47] your coat would always take a look at [93:50] the label while hanging it up. [93:51] >> In that single short moment of checking [93:54] the brand, he could tell who you were. [93:56] >> Then he knew exactly how to serve you. [93:58] >> Oh, speaking of that era, I suddenly [94:00] thought of something unrelated. Do you [94:02] know, I just found out that Professor [94:04] Jin's father was an underground party [94:06] member? An underground operative back [94:08] in the day, so at least in one aspect, [94:10] I see your father’s shadow in you. He [94:12] still spends his whole day collecting [94:15] information and observing all sorts of [94:17] different people. So, Professor Jin, [94:19] thank you for sharing so many [94:21] fascinating stories with us today.