95岁还像12岁一样活着!徐小虎活给出答案:很多烦恼不是生活给的,而是自己加上去的!#徐小虎 #人生智慧 #认知觉醒 #精神内耗 #周轶君 #成长 #衰老 #心理 #海外华人 #第一人称复数 #圆桌派

95岁还像12岁一样活着!徐小虎活给出答案:很多烦恼不是生活给的,而是自己加上去的!#徐小虎 #人生智慧 #认知觉醒 #精神内耗 #周轶君 #成长 #衰老 #心理 #海外华人 #第一人称复数 #圆桌派 — 纪实万象

纪实万象

AI-assisted summary of 95岁还像12岁一样活着!徐小虎活给出答案:很多烦恼不是生活给的,而是自己加上去的!#徐小虎 #人生智慧 #认知觉醒 #精神内耗 #周轶君 #成长 #衰老 #心理 #海外华人 #第一人称复数 #圆桌派 — original source. Check the original for full context.

Source published:

Key ideas

  • 艺术史学者徐小虎以笔墨本体为核心推进书画真伪考证,曾因断言台北故宫所藏元代吴镇作品几乎全为赝品而遭遇体制封杀与学界冷遇。 (10:25)
  • 经徐小虎多年考证,中国古画传世真迹极其罕见:五代无一真迹,北宋屈指可数,南宋仅见一幅,元四家中倪瓒真迹仅存一幅,伪作泛滥源于明代以来的附庸风雅。 (42:18)
  • 徐小虎主张艺术鉴赏应如品菜般信任本能,呼吁普通人打破对“大师”标签的迷信,并批评丧失精神触碰的当代概念艺术不过是“皇帝的新衣”。 (23:06)
  • 九旬高龄的徐小虎至今保持“十二岁”的直接与纯真,彻底抛弃成人社会的精神内耗与规训,在直面衰老与危房险境时依然达观推进十年翻译计划。 (53:22)

Detailed notes

## Background 本期内容由YouTube频道“纪实万象”于2026年10月9日发布,属于《圆桌派》及《第一人称复数》相关的人文对话节目。节目简介聚焦窦文涛、周轶君与嘉宾探讨人生智慧、精神内耗、成长与衰老等议题,记录了艺术史学者徐小虎跨越世纪的传奇人生与透彻洞见。

## TL;DR 年逾九旬的艺术史学家徐小虎与周轶君、张悦展开深入对谈,分享了自己从战时重庆的山野童年到五十多岁划动希腊古战舰、获得牛津博士学位的自由历程。她以近乎儿童般的纯真直觉与无畏勇气,打破艺术史界对“大师”名号与帝王鉴藏的盲目崇拜,直言故宫多数传世名作实为赝品,并痛斥文人画传统中的虚伪做派。面对生活中的衰老、心脏宿疾以及在尼泊尔山林悬崖边独居的困境,她毫无成年人的精神内耗,展现出以强大精神内核超越物质得失的透彻生命观。

## Atmosphere & style 整场对谈兼具童真幽默的轻盈与劈开学术权威的锐利,现场笑声不断却字字见血。徐小虎快人快语、毫不作伪的“老顽童”姿态,与主持人们对世俗焦虑的反思形成了鲜明而生动的张力。观众在倾听中仿佛跟随她剥离掉所有外部包装与虚饰,体验到一种洗涤精神内耗后的通透清澈与澎湃生命力。

## Bulletin - [10:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=625s) 艺术史学者徐小虎以笔墨本体为核心推进书画真伪考证,曾因断言台北故宫所藏元代吴镇作品几乎全为赝品而遭遇体制封杀与学界冷遇。 - [42:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=2538s) 经徐小虎多年考证,中国古画传世真迹极其罕见:五代无一真迹,北宋屈指可数,南宋仅见一幅,元四家中倪瓒真迹仅存一幅,伪作泛滥源于明代以来的附庸风雅。 - [23:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=1386s) 徐小虎主张艺术鉴赏应如品菜般信任本能,呼吁普通人打破对“大师”标签的迷信,并批评丧失精神触碰的当代概念艺术不过是“皇帝的新衣”。 - [53:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=3202s) 九旬高龄的徐小虎至今保持“十二岁”的直接与纯真,彻底抛弃成人社会的精神内耗与规训,在直面衰老与危房险境时依然达观推进十年翻译计划。

## Key takeaways - [20:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=1207s) 拒绝长大与十二岁的月下誓言:徐小虎童年自战时重庆迁往上海,目睹成人社交的虚浮客套与虚荣,在月光下起誓身体虽老去但心灵永不超过十二岁。 - [06:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=408s) 消除精神内耗是旺盛生命力的来源:成人的疲惫往往来自于思虑过度与社交虚饰,徐小虎全无心理负担、敢怒敢言的坦率使其在九旬高龄依然精力过人。 - [10:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=625s) 台北故宫“掀桌子”与学界集体封杀:徐小虎通过笔墨比对指出故宫所藏吴镇多为后代仿品,新任院方随即撤架其著作并禁止调卷,台湾主流学界亦对其长期冷处理。 - [13:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=783s) 帝王权力与艺术鉴赏的误区:乾隆等帝王出于汉化合法性大量搜刮古画并加盖御玺题诗,后世将政治权威与鉴定混为一谈,导致盲目信奉题跋印鉴而忽视画作真伪。 - [15:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=914s) 笔墨即画家的不可磨灭之“声音”:借鉴王己千理论,徐小虎像侦探般剖析笔触与结构,指出画家的机械执行力与功底不可能突变,笔墨本身才是唯一的真实凭证。 - [23:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=1386s) 观画如品菜,抛弃理论门槛:看画如同吃饭,好吃与否由舌头直观判断,观者无需预习艺术史理论,喜欢或无聊皆是内心纯粹合法的生理与灵魂感应。 - [25:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=1554s) 概念艺术的衰落与灵魂交流的缺位:杜尚的小便斗作为艺术史的反叛姿态不可复制,现代概念艺术剥离了温度与手头功夫,使艺术沦为无趣的文字阐释。 - [32:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=1972s) 战火与山野塑造的绝对独立:二战爆发迫使其家庭自罗马撤回重庆,山林的自由漫游与空袭警报下拉响的冒险,奠定了徐小虎终身不惧权威、追求自由的品格。 - [34:26](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=2066s) 自由必须付出被排斥的代价:徐小虎在53岁获牛津博士、54岁赴希腊拉古代战舰,一生行事不羁,她直言真正的自由在于不在乎他人看法,坦然承担代价。 - [42:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=2538s) 故宫无真画的精神崩溃:在意识到五代及宋元名画真迹极度匮乏后徐小虎曾绝望高烧三天,印证了《老子》“天下皆知美之为美斯恶已”的造假规律。 - [44:16](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=2656s) 未受知识污染的眼睛更能辨识真迹:王澍等学者在南宋特展中因迷信著录挑中伪作,而同行未读过艺术史的摄影师凭借直觉瞬间挑出全场唯一的真迹。 - [46:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=2772s) “气韵生动”是个性与生命神采的投射:王己千向徐小虎阐明,气韵不局限于轻灵飞扬,庄重凝涩同样可具气韵,其核心在于画家独特人格与生命经验的投射。 - [48:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=2926s) 剥离外在印鉴直通古人灵魂:鉴定与人际交往同理,剥除题跋、流传印鉴或学历、身份等虚假外壳,才能以本真的灵魂直接对接古人笔墨或现实中的他人。 - [56:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=3364s) 直斥文人画传统在身份上的虚伪:徐小虎批评中国古代文人一方面轻视职业画家,另一方面自己靠卖画谋利却自命清高标榜“业余”,陷入愚蠢的矛盾逻辑。

## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=3s) Forever Twelve: Early Childhood Memories and Universal Love

When addressed as an elderly lady, art historian Xu Xiaohu immediately pushes back. She genuinely perceives herself as forever twelve years old. Probing into this enduring youthfulness, Zhou Yijun brings up an extraordinary, luminous memory from Xu Xiaohu’s infancy—a moment from when she was barely over one year old. Her father brought home a large box filled with food. Because she was so small at the time, the box appeared monumental to her eyes, presenting itself as a giant vessel overflowing with love. Her father playfully told her that everything inside was meant just for her. Looking upon an endless world stocked with delicious treasures, she felt an overwhelming wave of shock and joy that permanently anchored her worldview: "That is to say, I have always been love."

This innate openness shapes her approach to art history. Although ancient Chinese art history is often treated as a distant, scholarly, or private discipline, Xu Xiaohu experiences it as an intimate encounter with the living breath of the ancients. She explains that early artists captured the pulse and breath of the great universe itself as they perceived it. She equates this cosmic resonance with what ancient Chinese thought refers to as *Li* (理, universal principle and cosmic order), or what Western traditions identify as God—a vast, transcendent presence woven directly into existence.

[01:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=112s) Learning to See: Thirty Minutes Before a Canvas in Milan

The dialogue turns to the fundamental question of human perception and the lost art of truly looking. Zhou Yijun recalls traveling to Hangzhou as a child with her mother in the early days of film photography. In their clumsy eagerness to capture memories, her mother accidentally loaded the film roll backwards without realizing it. Today, by contrast, tourists snap endless photos on smartphones in seconds, yet walk away having seen virtually nothing. Zhou Yijun contrasts this modern visual numbness with an experience she had earlier in the year at a museum gallery in Milan. During a thirty-minute piano recital held directly in front of a monumental painting—depicting Venice's St. Mark's Square blended with an imaginative assembly of Christian and Muslim figures—she was forced to stow her phone and sit in the front row with nowhere else to look.

At first, it was simply a large static painting, but as twenty and thirty minutes passed without interruption, the canvas began to transform. Details sparkled and breathed: figures seemed alive, subtle facial expressions emerged, and tiny background details—like a person walking a dog on a leash—became vividly clear. She felt as though she had physically stepped across the frame into the world of the painting. Afterward, a fellow attendee confirmed having the exact same sensation, and the museum director explained that he deliberately trains his staff using this precise exercise: sitting before a single painting for thirty to sixty minutes without moving or checking devices. Modern people suffer from eyes that function like blind wood—looking incessantly without ever truly seeing. When asked if she experiences this modern visual blindness, Xu Xiaohu immediately answers that she does not:

- Xu Xiaohu perceives art not merely with intellectual scrutiny, but through physical sensation and soul: "Because I look, I look, I keep looking and I feel with my skin. I feel with my soul." - Her way of seeing relies on radical slowness: she reads books at an exceptionally slow pace, takes hours to read personal letters, and eats her meals deliberately and slowly, refusing the rushed cadence of modern life.

[05:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=304s) An "Old Child": Zhang Yue Joins and the Vigor of Xu Xiaohu

Veteran television host Zhang Yue arrives to join Xu Xiaohu and Zhou Yijun after their morning boat journey. Zhang Yue shares that long before meeting Xu Xiaohu in person, her social feeds were filled with friends praising Xu as a legendary figure and an ideal role model for educating children. Xu Xiaohu smiles at the description, remarking that she is indeed an ideal companion for children because she is simply an "old child" herself: "Because I have intentionally not grown up." She insists that trying to educate adults is pointless, since adults have already become trapped in rigid adult behavior.

Zhang Yue reflects in astonishment on Xu Xiaohu’s sheer vitality. Despite being in her nineties, Xu Xiaohu had delivered a public lecture the preceding evening, spent the entire morning navigating waterways by boat for filming, and immediately transitioned into an intensive afternoon dialogue. Concerned about her physical exertion, Zhang Yue had repeatedly instructed production staff to ensure the elderly scholar would not have to walk across the grounds on foot. Moments later, the crew sent back a photo showing Xu Xiaohu briskly striding along the path with her hands casually clasped behind her back. Xu Xiaohu laughs, noting that her physical frame struggles to keep pace with her boundless spirit: she loves feeling the rush of wind against her face so much that she instinctively runs forward, pauses when her heart demands she catch her breath, and then starts running again.

[06:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=408s) Mental Friction vs. Childlike Directness: Overcoming the Stupidity of Adults

Contrasting her own mindset with Xu Xiaohu's effortless presence, Zhang Yue reveals how internal friction drains modern people of vitality. While sitting on the boat enjoying the scenery, Zhang Yue's mind was racing with anxious concerns: wondering whether Zhou Yijun had finished the interview outline, worrying that her own lack of formal art training would ruin the conversation, and stressing over whether flight delays the next day would disrupt an afternoon meeting in Beijing. She realized she was exhausted before the shoot had even begun simply because of excessive mental fretting. Xu Xiaohu, on the other hand, carries zero mental luggage. She falls asleep effortlessly anywhere—including leaning her chin directly on the customs counter while immigration officers process her passport:

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Childlike Presence vs Adult Mental Friction accDescr: A diagram contrasting childlike presence and adult mental friction as described by Xu Xiaohu and Zhang Yue.

subgraph Adult["The Adult Trap: Internal Friction"] A1["Overthinking & Anxiety"] --> A2["Meaningless Small Talk"] A2 --> A3["Obsession with Others' Opinions"] A3 --> A4["Exhaustion Before Starting"] end

subgraph Child["Xu Xiaohu's State: Childlike Directness"] C1["Zero Mental Luggage"] --> C2["Direct Truth & Play"] C2 --> C3["Complete Inner Freedom"] C3 --> C4["Unbounded Energy & Vitality"] end ```

Zhang Yue observes that Xu Xiaohu’s boundless stamina stems entirely from this total absence of internal friction. She does not harbor hesitation, self-doubt, or anxiety; if she feels joyful she expresses it, and if she refuses to do something she plainly declines. Xu Xiaohu bluntly summarizes why grown-ups struggle: "Because adults are stupid." She recalls realizing in childhood that adult chatter was hollow, full of polite small talk designed to avoid trouble that only ends up inviting more complications and social paranoia. Children, by contrast, meet to play rather than engage in artificial pleasantries, unconcerned with how others judge them: "I am who I am. If you don't like me, we can have a fight and see what happens."

When asked whether this uncompromising directness caused her severe hardship in professional circles, Xu Xiaohu remains entirely unbothered. Academic institutions routinely punished her: canceling her lectures, withholding speaking invitations, and refusing to publish her research. Yet she dismisses the fallout without bitterness: "That's their problem, not mine. I did what I felt I should do." This fearless stance defined her landmark doctoral dissertation on Yuan dynasty painter Wu Zhen, later published as *The Forgotten True Trace* (*Overcoming the Oblivion of the Masterpieces: A Re-examination of Wu Zhen's Painting and Calligraphy*). Begun in her thirties and completed at age fifty, the groundbreaking thesis boldly challenged established connoisseurship and was initially rejected by traditional academic authorities, yet finishing it completely freed her of any lingering inner burden.

[10:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=625s) Flipping the Table at the National Palace Museum

When Xu Xiaohu went to the National Palace Museum in Taipei to conduct research on the Yuan dynasty master Wu Zhen—one of the museum’s crowned jewels—she performed an exhaustive, stroke-by-stroke comparison of the collection. Her conclusion dropped like a bombshell: the vast majority of the paintings attributed to Wu Zhen were later imitations, with virtually no authentic originals among them. The hosts note that an assessment like that was the equivalent of "flipping over the table," an act that left the museum administration utterly furious and resulted in them revoking her access to examine their scrolls.

Xu recounts that when she initially arrived, the first director was an acquaintance who had witnessed her parents' wedding in Nanjing (she identifies him as John Ferguson, noting her mother's German background). That director had welcomed her candid eye: when he asked if she thought they had any fakes, she told him yes, and he enthusiastically replied, "That's great! Now we have something to research. Tell me which ones are fake." But when a new administration took charge, the reception chilled instantly. The subsequent director bluntly warned her, "Professor Hsu, I heard you said we have fakes in the Palace Museum... If you say we have fakes, we won't keep your book in our archives. We won't sell your books."

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Academic Repercussions of Xu Xiaohu's Connoisseurship accDescr: Flowchart illustrating the contrasting administrative reactions and academic ostracization following Xu Xiaohu's re-attribution of Palace Museum paintings.

subgraph S1["Initial Reception"] A["Xu Xiaohu conducts close brushwork analysis of Wu Zhen scrolls"] --> B["Early Director welcomes inquiry:<br/>'Now we have work to do'"] end

subgraph S2["Administrative Backlash"] A --> C["Conclusion: Almost all attributed Wu Zhen works are fakes"] C --> D["New Director bans books from museum shop and archives"] D --> E["Museum revokes physical access to scrolls"] end

subgraph S3["Academic Blacklisting"] E --> F["NTU, NTNU, and other Taiwanese universities cancel invitations"] F --> G["Scholarly silent treatment:<br/>Colleagues refuse debate and ignore findings"] end ```

The blacklisting rippled across the entire Taiwanese academic landscape. Major institutions like National Taiwan University (NTU) and National Taiwan Normal University stopped inviting her to speak. Her peers did not engage in public debate; instead, they simply gave her the silent treatment and acted as though she did not exist. Despite the hostility, Xu remains undaunted. She acknowledges that finding authentic masterworks is exceedingly rare, but that rarity is what makes genuine pieces so extraordinary: the metaphysical heights reached by early Chinese masters remain unparalleled anywhere in global art history, noting with pride that there are at least five true Northern Song masterpieces confirmed to exist.

- When Xu Xiaohu told the early director she was looking for genuine works among many imitations, he saw an academic opportunity; his successor viewed it as an institutional insult. - Rather than refuting her methodology in academic journals, the local scholarly community chose total ostracization, ignoring her research for years. - Xu emphasizes that despite the sea of copies, the few genuine Northern Song works possess an artistic, metaphysical depth that no other civilization's art has matched.

---

[13:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=783s) Imperial Vanity and the Myth of Emperor Qianlong's Eye

The panel delves into why imperial collections are overflowing with misattributions. Rulers across Chinese history—most notably Emperor Taizong of the Tang dynasty pursuing Wang Xizhi’s calligraphy, and Emperor Qianlong of the Qing dynasty amassing court masterworks—eagerly collected art to display their cultural legitimacy. They wanted to prove they were deeply steeped in Han high culture. However, trying to acquire genuine work by a master who had died four centuries earlier was nearly impossible even in antiquity, leading imperial workshops and merchants to supply copies and pastiches.

The problem, the speakers explain, is that later generations conflated imperial power with connoisseurship. When Emperor Qianlong stamped an imperial seal and brushed a poetic inscription declaring a painting to be an authentic Northern Song relic, centuries of viewers treated his endorsement as irrefutable proof. Yet Qianlong lived in the 18th century; he was an emperor with absolute political authority, not infallible scholarship. People fell into a pattern of blind ancestor and emperor worship, assessing the imperial seals rather than looking at the ink and paper itself.

The hosts compare Xu’s radical re-attributions to art historical debates over works like Zhang Xuan’s *Court Ladies of the Guo State* (*Guoguo Furen Youchun Tu*). Scholars argued over whether the Lady of Guo was the feminine rider in the center or the tall, commanding figure dressed in male attire riding in front. That sort of lively speculation is welcomed because it merely enriches the narrative without destroying the painting's monetary or institutional worth. But when an art historian steps up and declares an imperial Tang treasure to be a Ming dynasty forgery, the entire market and institutional prestige collapse—which is why the establishment treats Xu's conclusions as pure "madness."

---

[15:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=914s) The Painting Detective: Reading Brushwork as an Artist's Voice

Xu Xiaohu explains that her approach is grounded in rigorous visual anatomy and brushwork dynamics. While examining paintings outside the confines of glass vitrines—where one can study the ink and fiber directly—she found that out of five or six pieces, only two were genuine. This analytical method applies equally to Western painting, where structural discrepancies are often even more obvious. For example, if an artist could render intricate, hyper-refined hair in 1515, it is physically impossible for the same artist in 1517 to produce clumsy hands with formless fingers and deformed toes. Art historians often make excuses, claiming a trip to Italy changed an artist's palette to muted tones, but an artist’s core technical draftsmanship does not mysteriously regress into amateurism overnight.

Xu references the renowned collector and painter C.C. Wang (Wang Jiqian), who observed that brushwork is an artist’s indelible voice. A person’s face may age or change over decades, but the moment they speak, their identity is unmistakable; an artist's brush stroke functions the exact same way. Chen Danqing once remarked that Xu’s method is notoriously grueling and demanding: it requires analyzing every single ink splash, evaluating each stroke’s energy and structure, and measuring execution against historical stylistic evolution. Yet to Xu, it is neither boring nor a burden:

> "Because I’ve liked being a detective since I was a child. Now I’ve finally become a detective of paintings."

She describes waking up in the middle of the night, struck by a visual hunch, and opening her computer to inspect high-resolution details until dawn. She has no institutional quotas to fulfill, no bureaucratic reports to submit, and no urge to prove herself to anyone; her sole motivation is the pure joy of solving the mystery.

- Brushwork acts like a vocal signature: color schemes and subject matter may vary, but mechanical execution cannot be faked without leaving traces. - Western attributions frequently rationalize technical blunders as "stylistic evolution," ignoring clear anatomical regression. - Chen Danqing highlighted the sheer physical and mental labor of Xu's methodology, whereas Xu views it as the fulfillment of a lifelong dream to be a sleuth.

---

[17:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=1063s) A Taste of Old Beijing: Aiwo-wo and Childlike Fearlessness

The conversation takes a delightful, nostalgic turn when the production team reveals a surprise for Xu Xiaohu: a box of authentic *aiwo-wo* (艾窝窝) shipped directly from Beijing, honoring the flavors of her childhood. Xu instantly recognizes the treat with genuine delight. The hosts discuss the culinary changes over the decades: traditional Beijing *aiwo-wo* was always made with a white sugar and sesame filling, whereas modern commercial versions frequently substitute red bean paste. One Southern host laughs at her own cultural ignorance, confessing that until yesterday she had spent her life confusing *aiwo-wo* with plain corn buns (*wotou*), having wondered why Xu described eating one as being like "biting into a cloud."

Xu conspiratorially leans in to request the sesame-filled one, whispering playfully: > "Don't say 'white sugar' too loudly... Because Sabrina can hear. She doesn't want me eating sugar."

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: Traditional vs. Counterfeit Aiwo-wo Composition accDescr: Diagram comparing the authentic Beijing method of making aiwo-wo with modern, mass-produced versions.

subgraph Authentic["Authentic Traditional Beijing Aiwo-wo"] A1["Steamed Glutinous Rice Grains<br/>(Light, cloud-like texture)"] A2["Filling: White sugar, sesame, candied orange peel, shredded melon"] A1 --- A2 end

subgraph Imitation["Modern / Shortcut Version"] B1["Processed Glutinous Rice Flour<br/>(Rubbery, elastic bean-bun dough)"] B2["Filling: Standard red bean paste"] B1 --- B2 end ```

Tasting the confection, Xu notes that authentic *aiwo-wo* must retain the texture of whole, steamed glutinous rice grains pressed together, with a filling featuring sesame, sugar, candied peel, and candied melon shreds. The modern versions made with ground glutinous rice flour turn the pastry into an elastic, rubbery bun—an imitation she playfully dismisses as just another fake.

As they snack, the dialogue shifts to the creative spirit of children. One host recalls visiting an open art studio with her daughter, watching in awe as children attack a pristine white canvas without the slightest hesitation or anxiety about whether the end result will look "good." In contrast, adults are paralyzed by self-consciousness. An adult makes a timid mark, immediately judges it as a mistake, frantically smears and rubs the paint off, and ends up painting the entire canvas black and scrawling ironic gold letters over it—masking their fear of failure behind a joke. That uncorrupted, fearless intuition seen in young children mirrors the pure curiosity that drives Xu Xiaohu's lifelong pursuit of art.

[20:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=1207s) 从深山到上海:虚伪的成人世界与十二岁的月下誓言

谈及那种由内而外去感受事物的“心眼”,徐小虎回忆起自己敏锐的感官其实从未被蒙蔽过。抗战胜利后,她从重庆的大山搬到了上海,那种落差让她立刻察觉到了周遭的“虚假”。在山里走路是静悄悄的,而在上海的水泥路上走,鞋子总会发出奇怪刺耳的声响;山里一下雨,扑面而来的是清新潮湿的泥土清香,可上海和台湾下雨时,空气中什么气味也没有,只剩下一股冷冰冰的都市气息。

最令她难以忍受的是充斥着虚伪的成人社交。母亲与朋友们聚在客厅,嘴里尽是些毫无意义的客套与空话。大人们客气地张罗着让她弹钢琴给大家听,可当她刚坐下开始弹奏,底下的客人们就自顾自地热络大聊起来,根本没有一个人在听音乐。徐小虎当即合上琴盖走人,心里想着:“你们根本不懂音乐,我才不给你们弹。”

在她眼里,不仅大人假,就连学校里的同龄人也早早失去了纯真。她曾跳级转入南开中学,却发现身边的女同学既不关心国家大事,也不探究真实的世界,整天脑子里琢磨的只有找男朋友,以及讨论当时被称为“玻璃丝袜”的尼龙丝袜。她打趣道,当年的尼龙袜结实得怎么也穿不烂,母亲的一双袜子能穿好多年;后来厂商发现这种袜子不赚钱,便故意把它改得脆弱易碎、一碰就勾丝破洞。

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 山野真实与城市虚伪的对照 accDescr: 对比山林带来的自然直觉与都市成人社会的虚伪规训

subgraph Nature ["山林世界:本真与灵魂"] A["落雨泥土的芬芳"] B["无声的泥土漫步"] C["漫山遍野的松树与杜鹃"] end

subgraph City ["都市生活:规训与虚伪"] D["弹琴时旁若无人的客套寒暄"] E["谈论男友与玻璃丝袜的虚荣"] F["水泥地面生硬嘈杂的足音"] end

Nature -->|"迁往都市带来剧烈割裂"| City City -->|"促成对抗与坚守"| G["月下起誓:绝不长大超过12岁"] ```

面对虚假的城市、虚浮的寒暄和做作的无病呻吟,徐小虎感到极其痛苦。每天清晨醒来,她的枕头都是湿透的,夜里常常梦见大山里肆意生长的野树、松树和映山红——那里没有规整的人行道,人可以随心所欲地漫游穿梭。在一片压抑中,小小的她走到月光下跪地起誓:身体可以随着岁月老去直至死亡,但心绝对不能超过十二岁。正如周轶君所感慨的,她就像一位拒绝被世俗规训的“彼得·潘”,执拗地守住了那个不肯老去的精神内核。

[23:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=1386s) 《没有大师的艺术史》:看画如品菜,重拾直觉与本真

周轶君提到,现代社会的运转高度依赖各种标签与规训。人们笃信名校学历能换取体面的工作和世俗认可,而在艺术鉴赏中,大家更是习惯了在看画前先被灌输一长串“大师”的名字和“世界名画”的头衔。一旦不知道这些名字,普通人便会感到羞怯不安,生怕暴露了自己的浅薄。

徐小虎对此深有同感,这也正是她撰写出版《没有大师的艺术史》的初衷——为什么看艺术非要迷信“大师”?很多时候,人们围着一件作品由衷赞美,可一旦得知作者无名,态度便立刻反转;反之,若是一幅署着苏东坡或大名鼎鼎名家的字画,哪怕笔墨生硬、看得人极不舒服,中国观众也往往不敢质疑,反而下意识责怪自己:“一定是我水平不够,我看不懂。”

徐小虎直言这种心态是完全错误的:“如果你去饭馆吃一道菜觉得难吃,那就是不好吃,你的舌头会立刻告诉你答案。”哪怕端上来的是由米其林名厨烹饪的招牌大菜,哪怕它有着一个生僻拗口的外文名字,好吃与否,决定权完全在食客自己的感官里。欣赏字画同样如此,这是观者自己的体验与权利: - “名声与作品本身的品质毫无干系;” - “即便面对董源这样的大师,觉得不好看就是不好看;” - “若有人嘲笑你‘那是你太笨’,你完全可以坦然回答:‘对,我就是笨。’”

[25:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=1554s) 艺术不需要门槛:直接的灵魂触碰与对当代概念艺术的反思

在教学中,徐小虎常常严格要求学生“不许先翻书、不许看理论”,而是直接去面对画作本身。面对“毫无艺术史基础的普通人是否需要提前做功课”的疑问,她打了个绝妙的比方:人去吃饭需要先做准备吗?难道还要先吃点别的、刷个牙才能吃饭?看画就是一种一对一的、直接纯粹的情感感应。

观者根本不需要用高深的理论去分析它好在哪里,只要凭着直觉做出最本真的反应:“我真喜欢它,我想站在它面前多看一会儿”,或者“我觉得好无聊,我想赶紧走”。徐小虎强调,喜欢或讨厌完全来自内心而非大脑,就像走在林子里,每个人都有权利偏爱某棵树并为它驻足良久,而无需给出合乎逻辑的论证。当年她与丈夫一见钟情、彼此“晕倒般”坠入爱河,同样不需要任何关于家世、阶层或官职的世俗铺垫。

谈及自己走上中国艺术史研究的道路,徐小虎笑着坦白自己当年其实是个“美丽的误会”。当时她住在大学旁边,为了生计决定读个博士;在翻阅学科字母表时,一眼看到了“China”,二十年没讲过中文的她激动地以为自己终于可以“回家”了,而排在第一个字母“A”的正是“Art”。她原以为研究艺术是去感受鲜活的创造,未曾想竟是一头扎进书堆里去考据古人的陈年遗迹。

然而,徐小虎对当下的当代艺术同样批评颇多。她感叹现代社会陷入了一种普遍的悲观,人们不再关注灵魂深处的震颤,反而热衷于AI等肉体身外之物的工业化替代,导致整个时代的创造极度匮乏精神内核。在她看来,一件好的艺术作品根本不需要旁边那块写满晦涩阐释的铭牌来代言: - 达达主义大师杜尚将小便斗搬进美术馆,在当时是对艺术权威的一种反叛姿态,但这种挑衅“只能做一次,绝不可重复”; - 如果今天还有人挂个小便斗或是弄些毫无温度的机械装置,那仅仅是艺术家在博取眼球,是被蠢笨的学者捧出来的“皇帝的新衣”; - 概念艺术把艺术降级为单纯的“观念”,宣告了传统意义上艺术的衰落; - 艺术在根本上应当是“宗教的替代品”,是两个灵魂之间毫无阻隔的真实交流。

[30:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=1849s) The Transformative Power of Music and the Move from Rome to Wartime Chongqing

The conversation opens with a reflection on how deeply art can reshape a person's inner life. Listening to great music—such as Beethoven or Bach—can move someone to tears and alter their consciousness completely. The speakers observe that this type of transformation often occurs quietly; you grow and expand your worldview without even realizing it at the time.

The discussion then turns to Xu Xiaohu's early childhood. Because her father, Xu Daolin, served as a diplomat in the Republic of China's embassy in Rome, she spent her earliest years in Italy surrounded by nannies, household staff, and strict supervision. However, the outbreak of World War II abruptly shattered that sheltered world when Italy aligned with the Axis powers alongside Germany and Japan, placing it in direct opposition to China. The diplomatic mission was forced to withdraw, and the family returned to China, eventually settling in the wartime capital of Chongqing.

Moving from diplomatic quarters in Europe to wartime Chongqing was a jarring shift. The city endured years of relentless, heavy bombing by Japanese aircraft while serving as China's provisional wartime hub. Yet, when asked how this displacement and chaos affected her childhood psyche, Xu Xiaohu remembers not terror, but a sudden, exhilarating escape from adult control. In Chongqing, her family lived high up in the mountains, trading European drawing rooms for raw nature and unstructured freedom.

- **Historical Context:** Italy's entry into World War II alongside Germany and Japan forced Chinese diplomatic personnel, including Xu Xiaohu's father, to evacuate Rome and return to China. - **The Wartime Capital:** Chongqing served as the provisional capital of the Republic of China during the Second Sino-Japanese War, enduring near-constant aerial bombardment. - **Contrasting Childhoods:** The transition from highly supervised domestic life in Rome with servants to semi-wild mountain living in Chongqing permanently shaped Xu Xiaohu's independent spirit.

---

[32:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=1972s) Solitude on the Mountain: Sneaking Out of Air-Raid Shelters and the Jialing River

At school in Chongqing, Xu Xiaohu stood out from her peers due to her reddish, wavy hair, prompting the local children to tease her by calling her *"Yang Pozi"* (foreign granny) or *"Yellow Yang Pozi."* She vehemently pushed back, shouting: "I am Chinese; I am Chinese!" When the air-raid sirens wailed and the population crowded into underground bomb shelters, she regularly slipped away unnoticed and escaped back up into the hills. Unafraid of the explosions, she would watch from the open ridge and count the Japanese bombers flying overhead. Chongqing’s famous thick river fog routinely cloaked the terrain, leaving the bombers searching blindly and sparing many targets below.

The hosts point out that despite growing up amid war and displacement, her memories are remarkably free of trauma. Xu Xiaohu’s happiest moments were spent entirely alone. Below the mountain summit where her home stood, a single winding path led downward past a slope. Beneath a pine tree sat a large, flat rock where she loved to perch for hours. From that vantage point, she looked down on the wide, shimmering sandbars and the glistening waters of the Jialing River rolling beneath the sunlight. Listening for the faint sound of her family's voices in the distance, she felt as though the entire universe belonged to her alone.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Childhood Mountain Sanctuary in Chongqing accDescr: Diagram illustrating Xu Xiaohu's childhood escape from air-raid sirens to nature and solitary contemplation.

subgraph AirRaid["Wartime Environment"] A["Air-Raid Sirens Sound"] --> B["Crowded Bomb Shelters"] B --> C["Sneaking Out Unnoticed"] end

subgraph Nature["Solitary Sanctuary"] C --> D["Mountain Path Below Summit"] D --> E["Flat Rock Beneath Pine Tree"] E --> F["Watching the Jialing River"] end

subgraph Mindset["Inner Experience"] F --> G["Counting Japanese Planes in Fog"] G --> H["Profound Joy in Solitude & Freedom"] end ```

---

[34:26](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=2066s) A Wild Child's Independence: Taking Punishments and Paying the Price for Freedom

Xu Xiaohu passionately argues that parents owe their children a sanctuary—a private, off-limits territory where adults never intrude, allowing young minds to dwell completely in their own imaginative worlds. Behind her Chongqing house was an open slope where the household dumped stove ashes. Wild vines hung over the ridge, and she would grab them to swing out over the slope like Tarzan, frequently losing her grip and plunging straight into the ash pile. Left to her own devices, she staged imaginary battles where she heroically trampled Japanese imperialism into the water.

This leads to a discussion on social conditioning. Children naturally start out wild and oblivious to social etiquette, but the adult world steadily trains and molds them through expectations, scoldings, and fear of judgment. When her parents warned her that her behavior was unladylike or made her a laughingstock, Xu Xiaohu refused to internalize their shame. Whenever a spanking was handed down, she simply extended her hand forward without hesitation: "You hit, you finish hitting, and I'm still the same."

The panel reflects on how rare such authenticity is. Most people crave Teacher Xiao Hu’s effortless freedom, but they refuse to pay its inevitable cost. Because she remained uncompromisingly authentic throughout her career, institutional gatekeepers frequently penalized her: academic departments barred her research, publishers rejected her manuscripts, and traditional scholars attempted to deny her credentials. Real freedom is a conscious bargain:

> "Don't be afraid of what others think of you; that's their business. They think we're no good, they think we're stupid—that's their feeling. You are free to do that. Please do so. I'll still do what I want to do, as long as I don't hurt you."

---

[37:20](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=2240s) Rowing a 170-Person Warship in Greece at Fifty-Four

When asked about significant chapters in her adulthood for her memoir—which currently only covers up to age eleven—Xu Xiaohu jumps straight to her fifties. In 1987, at the age of fifty-three, she successfully earned her doctorate from the University of Oxford, an achievement critics insisted she could never attain. Soon after, she was elected female captain of an Oxford graduate rowing crew.

Her rowing passion culminated in an extraordinary adventure in Greece: volunteering to crew a full-scale reconstruction of an ancient Athenian trireme warship. Propelling the massive vessel required 171 rowers pulling synchronized, 26-foot-long oars arranged across three tiered decks (top, middle, and bottom). Xu Xiaohu remembers the immense, bone-rattling weight of the oar, which made her shake as she pulled.

When she originally tried out, the recruiter from Oxford attempted to reject her, claiming she was too short. Xu Xiaohu shot back without missing a beat: "No, you're too tall!" To prove her point, she cited the ancient Greek hoplite armor preserved in the museum, which fit her compact frame perfectly while the modern, six-foot-tall rowers could barely squeeze into it. Because the ancient warship was built for the proportions of classical Greek sailors, the towering modern athletes were cramped and miserable, while Xu Xiaohu fit comfortably into the rowing bench.

- **The Oxford Doctorate (1987):** Completed her D.Phil in art history at Oxford around age 53, defying academic gatekeepers. - **The Trireme Project:** Participated in the sea trials of a reconstructed ancient Greek trireme (featuring 171 rowers arranged across three tiered decks). - **The 26-Foot Oar:** Pulled massive, historically accurate sweeps that required tremendous physical endurance. - **The Hoplite Sizing Argument:** Pointed out that archaeological armor proved classical Greek citizens were small, making her build ideal for the cramped ancient warship.

---

[39:26](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=2366s) Unconventional Motherhood: The Sausage Pen and Making Whiskey-Barrel Cider While Pregnant

The hosts marvel at the stark contrast between Xu Xiaohu's life at fifty-four and that of typical middle-aged women. While most peers were agonizing over retirement ranks, spousal promotions, and getting their children into prestigious universities, Xu Xiaohu was pulling warship oars across the Mediterranean, lecturing, and raising children on her own eccentric terms.

Her approach to child-rearing was as practical as it was artistic. When her toddler threw tantrums, she did not fuss or coddle. Instead, she constructed a tall, upright, sausage-shaped cylindrical pen. When the child began crying uncontrollably, she placed him inside the structure where he could stand safely and vent his frustration while she observed calmly from nearby. The hosts laugh heartily, calling it an artist mother's real-life version of "inviting the gentleman into the urn," comparing it to the traditional trick of flipping a four-legged wooden stool upside down to keep a restless toddler contained during dinner.

Xu Xiaohu recalls pregnancy not as an illness to be pampered, but as an energetic, joyful adventure. Craving hard cider, she routinely climbed apple trees while heavily pregnant to gather fruit. She hauled sacks of fallen apples to a press for juicing, then transferred the cider into a fragrant oak whisky barrel to ferment. To achieve the rich, complex fermentation of traditional home brewing, the recipe called for more than just fruit: into the barrel went fallen twigs, tiny garden insects, and even minced meat and pork fat. When the hosts react with audible horror and ask if such a concoction was actually drinkable, Xu Xiaohu beams with delight, insisting it yielded an extraordinarily delicious brew.

[42:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=2538s) 故宫无真画:三次高烧与极度绝望

谈及徐小虎在求学、做母亲与执教的整个人生历程中,对精神与灵魂的追求始终未曾被凡俗事务磨灭。当被问及一生中是否曾遭遇过真正难以逾越的至暗时刻时,徐小虎坦言,自己曾陷入极度抑郁,甚至一度“迈不过这个坎”。那场巨大的精神危机并非源于故宫藏画中有赝品,而是当她深入研究后震惊地发现:传世名作中几乎找不到真正的真迹,真迹究竟该如何寻觅?在意识到这个残酷真相的瞬间,她身体直接崩溃,发了高烧,整整躺在床上三天无法起身。

徐小虎解释,情况的严峻程度远超常人想象:五代画作竟无一幅真迹;北宋流传下来的作品屈指可数;南宋画作在当时所见中唯有一幅是真的;即便是名震画史的“元四家”,传世真迹亦是寥若晨星。以台北故宫藏品为例,黄公望仅有《富春山居图》一幅真迹;吴镇仅存三幅半;而倪瓒(倪云林)的真迹更是仅仅留存一幅。对此,对谈嘉宾提及倪瓒作品向来声名远播,徐小虎指出,正是因为明代文人普遍形成了“江南人家若无倪瓒画作便属庸俗”的攀比风气,导致天下人人争相追捧膜拜,赝品与伪作遂漫天滋生。这也印证了《老子》中的古老箴言——“天下皆知美之为美,斯恶已”,一旦某种美被群体狂热推崇为标准,虚假与丑陋便随之而生。

- 五代绘画:无一真迹传世 - 北宋绘画:真迹极为稀少 - 南宋绘画:当时考证仅见一幅真迹 - 元四家:黄公望仅存《富春山居图》一卷;吴镇存三幅半;倪瓒仅存一幅真迹

---

[44:16](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=2656s) 王澍与摄影师:未被“污染”的眼睛才能认出真迹

在经历绝望后,事情迎来了意想不到的转折。著名建筑师王澍来到台湾,邀请徐小虎协助工作,期间几位建筑师一同聚餐。恰逢台北故宫博物院正举办规模宏大的“南宋”特展,展出了顶级的南宋官窑瓷器与书画。徐小虎便对他们神秘地透露:“展览里有一幅是真正的真迹,你们想不想去看?”众人顿时好奇追问是哪一幅,徐小虎故意卖关子不肯直说,而是向他们发起挑战:“这幅画与所有其他作品都完全不同,你们自己去找找看。”

次日,王澍与建筑师团队兴致勃勃地奔赴故宫展厅。他们在展厅里反反复复寻找,却始终无法挑出那幅独一无二的作品。最终建筑师们挑出来的,全都是画册与教科书中频繁刊载、流传有序的名作,而徐小虎一眼便知那些全是被书本认可的赝品。令人称奇的是,同行的摄影师突然指着一幅画问:“是这一张吗?”他竟准确无误地找到了那幅南宋真迹。徐小虎感慨道,正是因为摄影师不懂艺术史、没有读过教科书、未曾被现成知识系统所“污染”,他凭借全然清澈的视觉直觉去捕捉画面,反而能瞬间辨识出那股超拔于平庸伪作之外的原生力量。

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 鉴画认知路径对比 accDescr: 对比受艺术史知识污染的学者与未受污染的直觉观察者在辨别真迹时的差异

subgraph Biased ["受知识‘污染’的观察者(建筑师/学者)"] A1["依赖画册著录与权威定论"] --> A2["执着于名气与流传印记"] A2 --> A3["挑出被教科书认证的‘名作’(实为伪作)"] end

subgraph Direct ["清澈无羁的直觉观察者(摄影师)"] B1["抛弃知识定势与艺术史标签"] --> B2["直观感受笔墨的气韵与异质感"] B2 --> B3["精准锁定独一无二的原作真迹"] end ```

---

[46:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=2772s) 对话王己千:“气韵生动”究竟是什么?

古画的奇妙之处,在于创作者千年之前的人格神采、微芒情绪与生命本质,皆能借由笔触纤毫毕现地留存至今,令后世观者产生跨越时空的共振。徐小虎以唐寅(唐伯虎)讥讽自命不凡文士的讽刺画作《画士图》为例,画面毫无敬意,却淋漓尽致地刻画出文人傲慢滑稽的情态。

随后话题转到徐小虎三十多岁时与书画鉴藏大师王己千先生的长篇对话录。青年时期的徐小虎在拜访王己千时,提出的第一个核心问题就是谢赫六法之首的“气韵生动”:“我们总谈‘气韵生动’,究竟什么才是‘气韵’?”当时作为后生晚辈的徐小虎在学术探讨上毫不怯懦,甚至屡屡反驳王己千。当王己千笑话她“连这个都看不出,岂不是笨”时,徐小虎便当场回敬道:“你若教不会我,岂不是更笨?”

王己千向她深入阐释了“气韵”的本质: - **突破浅层理解**:常人往往误以为“气韵灵动”就是用笔轻灵、敏捷、飞扬流动; - **沉穆亦有气韵**:笔触极为庄重、凝涩、质朴的作品,同样可以具备充沛的气韵; - **气韵的核心**:它绝非单一的笔墨技法,而是画家独特世界观、鲜明人格气质与内在深层情感的个性化投射。如同评价一个活生生的人,沉稳木讷的人与灵巧通达的人各自皆有其不可替代的生命神采。

对谈中周轶君亦感慨,真正具备大学问的宗师往往从不畏惧尖锐反问,也不屑于摆架子;反而是那些半瓶醋和沾染了“成人病”(adult disease)的人,因内心匮乏与自卑,从十二岁起受父母“衣服不整洁别人会怎么看”的训导所规训,习惯了以虚矫的面具迎合外界,拼命装扮成更聪明、更高贵的模样。

---

[48:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=2926s) 剥离外在印鉴:直面笔墨与灵魂的原始连接

徐小虎之所以能在书画鉴定领域打破传统宗派藩篱、开辟出全新范式,根源在于她彻底放下了对世俗评价的在乎。常规的书画鉴赏者往往因自身缺乏底气,不敢直面画作本身,而是本末倒置地去考据画幅上的递藏印章、乾隆御题、诗塘题跋等外部痕迹。但这些印章与题跋全属于外人,唯独笔墨本身才真正代表创作者的心性。徐小虎在鉴画之初,便利落地剥离掉所有这些虚饰的外部层壳,单刀直入地审视笔触内在的生命律动。

这种直抵内核的敏锐,源于童年纯真感知未经世俗社会化修正与磨灭的幸运。当一个人的直觉足够敏锐,画中千年前画家的庄严、崇高或悲凉,就能即刻与观者的内心接通。徐小虎将这种鉴画心法自然延伸至现实生活中的人际交往:她初次见到现场的伙伴时便能自然张开双臂热烈拥抱,完全不必预先知道对方的姓名、学历、官职与社会地位。无论是清洁工、画家、政要还是学生,世俗标签皆是虚妄,重要的是透过皮囊与眼眸,让一个“原始本真的灵魂”去直接拥抱另一个灵魂。

[52:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=3150s) 尼泊尔的隐居日常与知足常乐

隐居山林的生活看似清贫,但徐小虎并不觉得苦。她坦言,虽然每天吃的东西几乎一模一样,天天面对同一堆米饭确实让人感到无聊,但当地尼泊尔人的精神状态深深触动了她。那些尼泊尔工人极其贫穷,工作时却总是开开心心地唱歌。他们干上几个小时,只要赚够了当天需要的钱就会停手,说一句“谢谢,我要回家了”。如果你问他为什么不多干一点,他会回答:“我已经够了,明天我还会再来。”

相比之下,中国人往往习惯计较“一个小时能挣多少钱”,然后拼命干到精疲力竭。尼泊尔人追求的只是当下的快乐,彼此的价值尺度截然不同。

- 尼泊尔工人的处世哲学:只要赚足一天的口粮便收工回家,劳作中充满歌声,从不过度透支生命。 - 两种生活观念的对比:一种是以快乐和满足为标准,另一种则是追求收益最大化、不断劳碌直至耗尽精力。

---

[53:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=3202s) “该吃毒药了”:面对衰老的达观与十年译书计划

谈及当下的身体状况与服药问题,徐小虎展现出惊人的坦率与幽默。因为心脏不好,她每天必须服用五种不同的药物,包括降脂药和利尿剂等。她曾上网查阅过这些药品的说明书,发现每一款药的副作用都非常凶险,甚至可能致命。因此,她每天服药时都会对自己调侃一句:“该吃我的毒药了。”

由于这些烈性药物极伤胃,绝不能空腹吃,徐小虎在吃“毒药”前必须垫垫肚子。若赶不及正经吃早餐,她就直接喝一小口橄榄油,或者挖上一大勺花生酱咽下去护住胃壁。尽管年逾九旬、身患宿疾,她对生活依然怀抱长远的规划。她透露,这次回到尼泊尔后将开启一项长达十年的翻译与探索新生活方式的工作;按照以往的工作节奏推算,这项宏大的工程预计至少还需要十年才能完成。

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 徐小虎的服药日常与抗病心境 accDescr: 流程展示了徐小虎面对具有严重副作用的心脏药物时,用食物垫胃并保持坦然幽默的心态过程。

subgraph Prep ["服药前防护"] A["查阅药品副作用<br/>(降脂、利尿等5种药物)"] --> B["自嘲:'该吃我的毒药了'"] B --> C{"空腹不可服药"} C -->|简易垫胃| D["喝一口橄榄油<br/>或挖一大勺花生酱"] end

subgraph Medication ["平稳服药与长远寄托"] D --> E["按时服药维持心脏机能"] E --> F["投身未来10年的翻译工作"] end ```

---

[54:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=3283s) 悬崖边的坍塌危房与超然的精神支柱

当被问及在尼泊尔是否住在加德满都等大城市时,徐小虎解释自己最近确实搬进了城里,但这并非贪图享乐,而是因为山上的房子快要塌了。尼泊尔每年五月到十月都是漫长的雨季,暴雨引发了严重的泥石流。原本屋前开阔的平地被雨水冲刷殆尽,直接塌陷成了深达七十米的悬崖峭壁,且一直未能找到用石头加固护墙的稳妥办法。

徐小虎就这样在悬崖边摇摇欲坠的房子里住了一段时间,后来才搬入市区,身边并没有特意安排人伺候照顾。窦文涛与在座嘉宾感叹,大家由衷佩服徐小虎九十多岁依然精神矍铄,并非因为她百病不侵或天赋异禀,而是因为她坦然接纳身体的磨损与病痛,愿意支付生命所需的代价。更重要的是,她内心拥有极其强大、形而上的精神支柱。当一个人的精神高度凝聚在崇高的事物上时,眼前的物质得失与肉体苦痛便显得微不足道——“有饭吃很好,没饭吃也无所谓”。

---

[56:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=3364s) 论中国文人画的虚伪与“愚蠢”

话题转向艺术史时,徐小虎犀利地剖析了中国文人画与西方绘画传统的深层分野。在西方,画家通常是职业化的,一生专心致志地投入作画;而在中国古代,主导画坛的却是文人画。文人们大多身居官职,本职是朝廷命官,并不被视为职业画工。中国历史上虽然也有极高水准的职业画家,但在文人主导的传统中往往遭到轻视,社会地位低下。

徐小虎言辞尖锐地批评了这种风气,直斥这是“文人的愚蠢”。她指出,即便是范宽、郭熙这样伟大的山水画大师,本质上也是领俸禄进行创作的画家;而到了清代,那些自命清高的文人们同样靠画画谋利或领取报酬,甚至连许多根本不会画画的文人也跟风作画。文人们一方面从事着画家的实际劳动,另一方面却耻于承认画家的专业身份,陷入“业余的专业画家”这种自我标榜的虚伪逻辑中。徐小虎连连感叹:“简直没有比这更蠢的了,笨蛋文人,真是太愚蠢了。”

## Notable quotes > [00:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=3s) That is to say, I have always been love. — 徐小虎

> [01:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=112s) Because I look, I look, I keep looking and I feel with my skin. I feel with my soul. — 徐小虎

> [05:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=304s) Because I have intentionally not grown up. — 徐小虎

> [06:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=408s) Because adults are stupid. — 徐小虎

> [06:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=408s) That's their problem, not mine. I did what I felt I should do. — 徐小虎

> [15:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=914s) Because I’ve liked being a detective since I was a child. Now I’ve finally become a detective of paintings. — 徐小虎

> [17:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=1063s) Don't say 'white sugar' too loudly... Because Sabrina can hear. She doesn't want me eating sugar. — 徐小虎

> [20:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=1207s) 你们根本不懂音乐,我才不给你们弹。 — 徐小虎

> [23:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=1386s) 如果你去饭馆吃一道菜觉得难吃,那就是不好吃,你的舌头会立刻告诉你答案。 — 徐小虎

> [34:26](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=2066s) Don't be afraid of what others think of you; that's their business. They think we're no good, they think we're stupid—that's their feeling. You are free to do that. Please do so. I'll still do what I want to do, as long as I don't hurt you. — 徐小虎

> [46:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=2772s) 你若教不会我,岂不是更笨? — 徐小虎

> [53:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=3202s) 该吃我的毒药了。 — 徐小虎

> [56:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ&t=3364s) 简直没有比这更蠢的了,笨蛋文人,真是太愚蠢了。 — 徐小虎

## Mentioned 徐小虎, 周轶君, 张越, 窦文涛, 吴镇, 约翰·福开森, 唐太宗, 王羲之, 乾隆帝, 张萱, 王己千, 陈丹青, 董源, 马塞尔·杜尚, 徐道邻, 王澍, 黄公望, 倪瓒, 唐寅, 谢赫, 范宽, 郭熙, 台北故宫博物院, 牛津大学, 台湾大学, 台湾师范大学, 南开中学, 《被遗忘的真迹:吴镇书画重审》, 《没有大师的艺术史》, 《富春山居图》, 《虢国夫人游春图》, 《画士图》, 艾窝窝, 三层桨座战船, 嘉陵江, 重庆, 加德满都

## Video description 💡订阅我们,换个视角看懂万象: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwiWVn-hZq3_zuOk570kyGA

简介:《圆桌派》节目以圆桌为名,旨在体现圆桌席上人人平等,每期由窦文涛携手三位嘉宾,还原在生活中发生在圆桌旁、海阔天空的精彩聊天。延续真实不“装”的窦式主持风格,立足网络,放眼世间,神侃包罗万象的话题,嬉笑言谈中彼此迸发出智慧火花。 《锵锵行天下》第三季江南烟雨,一路如一副徐徐铺开的画卷。访名山,赏奇石,寻妙缘。窦文涛与老友们浸润在江南的诗情画意中。数十天的路程,在十三集的正片中难以完整展现,有太多的行程与内容难以取舍,所以借由本次《锵锵拾遗》,再次将未播出的素材进行汇编拾遗,将此次江南之行的更多精彩内容奉献给观众,让观众重温江南烟雨中的谈笑风生。 主持人:窦文涛 嘉宾:陈坤 / 周迅 / 蒋方舟 / 王晶 / 梁文道 / 马家辉 / 周轶君 / 武志红 / 马未都 / 张亚东 / 严歌苓 / 汪海林 / 金宇澄 / 李玫瑾

【圆桌派 窦文涛】人性 · 社会 · 认知:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYxKs_Kmt18U 【鸿观·宋鸿兵】金融 · 权力 · 逻辑:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLcTh2pbxeb-o 【观复嘟嘟 马未都】历史 · 收藏 · 人生:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLOBX8CQ3IYr0 【第一人称复数 周轶君】青年 · 女性 · 世界:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLE0SKDns16wY 【风马牛书房 冯仑】财富 · 经济 · 规律:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBtYaSLkGpag 【百家新说 尹烨】科技 · 生命 · 未来:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIUyn5AuyYUo 【众生 蔡永康】人物 · 命运 · 社会观察:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIOgZ1dPF0JA 【锵锵行天下 窦文涛】世界 · 文明 · 思想:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIJzYJ5gZ-HA

#中国未来 #中国社会 #植物 #生态 #大自然 #经济 #推荐 #热门 #经济 #圆桌派 #纪实 #时间 #历史 #文化 #聊天 #新闻 #心理健康 #中美关系 #科技 #经济 #金融 #香港 #台湾 #hongkong #taiwan #民生 #纪实 #纪录片 #窦文涛 #周轶君 #马未都 #许子东 #尹烨 #圆桌派第七季 #圆桌派 #中国经济 #中国内卷 #中国危机 #地方债 #新能源车 #光伏 #经济危机 #中国房地产 #中美竞争 #科技创新 #制度决定一切 #民营经济 #企业家精神 #AI时代

[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5-n2KfcKQ)

中文简报

95岁徐小虎:许多烦恼并非生活所致,而是自己强加的 年逾九旬的艺术史学家徐小虎与周轶君、张悦展开深入对谈,分享了自己从战时重庆的山野童年到五十多岁划动希腊古战舰、获得牛津博士学位的自由历程。她以近乎儿童般的纯真直觉与无畏勇气,打破艺术史界对“大师”名号与帝王鉴藏的盲目崇拜,直言故宫多数传世名作实为赝品,并痛斥文人画传统中的虚伪做派。面对生活中的衰老、心脏宿疾以及在尼泊尔山林悬崖边独居的困境,她毫无成年人的精神内耗,展现出以强大精神内核超越物质得失的透彻生命观。 艺术史学者徐小虎以笔墨本体为核心推进书画真伪考证,曾因断言台北故宫所藏元代吴镇作品几乎全为赝品而遭遇体制封杀与学界冷遇。 (10:25) 经徐小虎多年考证,中国古画传世真迹极其罕见:五代无一真迹,北宋屈指可数,南宋仅见一幅,元四家中倪瓒真迹仅存一幅,伪作泛滥源于明代以来的附庸风雅。 (42:18) 徐小虎主张艺术鉴赏应如品菜般信任本能,呼吁普通人打破对“大师”标签的迷信,并批评丧失精神触碰的当代概念艺术不过是“皇帝的新衣”。 (23:06) 九旬高龄的徐小虎至今保持“十二岁”的直接与纯真,彻底抛弃成人社会的精神内耗与规训,在直面衰老与危房险境时依然达观推进十年翻译计划。 (53:22)

Reading summary

艺术史学者徐小虎主张许多生活烦恼皆源于成人后人为附加的精神规训,提倡以十二岁孩童般的纯直觉生活与鉴赏。她强调艺术应直面笔墨与灵魂的本质交流,并依此打破权威崇拜,对古代传世书画的真伪谱系提出了彻底颠覆性的质疑。 守住十二岁的纯真:拒斥成人虚伪与内耗 徐小虎拒绝被视作传统老人,认为自己内心始终停留于十二岁。幼年迁往上海后,她对成人社交中虚浮客套的应酬深感痛苦,曾在月光下起誓身体可以衰老但心智决不超过十二岁。张越对比指出,现代人的疲惫常来自对未发生之事的焦虑、对他人评判的恐惧以及无意义的客套,而徐小虎完全没有这种精神内耗。面对表达自我的代价,徐小虎持坦然态度。由于在学术界直言不讳,她曾遭遇讲座被取消、机构拒绝出书及学界孤立等处遇,但她认为坚持自身职责是自己的事,外界的反应则是他人的问题,真正的自由必须有甘愿承担代价的觉悟。 看画如品菜:摆脱权威标签与概念崇拜 (23:06) 在艺术鉴赏领域,徐小虎在《没有大师的艺术史》中反对盲从名号与权威。她将鉴赏比作吃饭,认为作品好坏由观者自身的感官直接决定,若觉得不好看便无需违心附和,名气与作品品质并无必然联系。她要求学生看画时不看理论、直接面对作品,因为艺术是灵魂之间的直接触碰。周轶君提到现代人被海量拍照绑架而丧失真正观看的能力,徐小虎则坚持用身体和灵魂慢速感知。在台北故宫的南宋特展中,建筑师依据画册挑出的多为赝品,反而是没有受过艺术史理论“污染”的摄影师凭借直觉找出了唯一的真迹。同时,徐小虎批评当代部分概念艺术将创作沦为单纯的观念炒作,缺乏精神内核,成了需要靠文字铭牌解释的“皇帝的新衣”。 笔墨如声:颠覆帝王收藏迷信与真迹神话 (10:25) 徐小虎将笔墨比作画家的声音,主张通过笔触与结构演变来辨析真伪,而非依赖外部题跋与印鉴。她与王己千探讨“气韵生动”时确立了认知:气韵不仅限于轻灵飞扬,庄重凝涩同样可具气韵,其核心是画家生命力与世界观的个性化投射。她指出中国历代统治者出于文化正统性渴求大量网罗名作,导致伪作充斥,而乾隆帝的题跋与钤印在后世被盲目奉为真伪准则,使人们看重帝王权威多于纸墨本身。基于微观笔墨考证,她在博士论文及台北故宫藏品研究中提出颠覆性论断:元代吴镇传世作品绝大多数为后世仿作;五代绘画无真迹流传,北宋真迹屈指可数,南宋在其当时所见中仅存一幅,元四家中黄公望仅有《富春山居图》、倪瓒仅有一幅真迹。这一结论虽导致其被博物馆撤销看画权限并遭学者群体性冷遇,但她始终坚信真正大师之作的形而上高度无可替代。 超然面对衰老病痛与晚年生活实践 (52:30) 步入晚年后,徐小虎依然保持独特的行动力与生活哲学。她在五十多岁完成牛津大学博士学业,并在希腊参与了需171人协同划桨的古代战船海试。面对心脏疾病与每日需服用的降脂、利尿等5种药物,她自嘲“该吃毒药了”,并幽默地以一口橄榄油或花生酱垫胃护体。在尼泊尔隐居时,即便所住房屋因暴雨泥石流面临深达70米的悬崖,她依然安之若素,并高度赞赏当地工人赚足当日所需便唱歌回家的知足哲学。目前她仍在推进长达十年的翻译与探索计划。此外,她对传统文人画提出严厉批评,指出古代文人一方面依赖画作谋利,另一方面却耻于承认专业画家身份、自诩业余清高,陷入了自欺欺人的虚伪逻辑。 徐小虎以剥离功利与标签的“十二岁”视角,构建了直击笔墨内核的书画鉴赏路径与超然的生活方式;然而,其对台北故宫及传世古画真伪的大胆重估,也因打破了既有的学术权威与机构利益,长期面临体制性沉默与边缘化的争议。

Source quotes

[0:03] 徐小虎: That is to say, I have always been love. [1:52] 徐小虎: Because I look, I look, I keep looking and I feel with my skin. I feel with my soul. [5:04] 徐小虎: Because I have intentionally not grown up. [6:48] 徐小虎: Because adults are stupid. [6:48] 徐小虎: That's their problem, not mine. I did what I felt I should do. [15:14] 徐小虎: Because I’ve liked being a detective since I was a child. Now I’ve finally become a detective of paintings. [17:43] 徐小虎: Don't say 'white sugar' too loudly... Because Sabrina can hear. She doesn't want me eating sugar. [20:07] 徐小虎: 你们根本不懂音乐,我才不给你们弹。 [23:06] 徐小虎: 如果你去饭馆吃一道菜觉得难吃,那就是不好吃,你的舌头会立刻告诉你答案。 [34:26] 徐小虎: Don't be afraid of what others think of you; that's their business. They think we're no good, they think we're stupid—that's their feeling. You are free to do that. Please do so. I'll still do what I want to do, as long as I don't hurt you. [46:12] 徐小虎: 你若教不会我,岂不是更笨? [53:22] 徐小虎: 该吃我的毒药了。 [56:04] 徐小虎: 简直没有比这更蠢的了,笨蛋文人,真是太愚蠢了。

Original transcript

[0:03] You must be unhappy when you hear [0:05] people call you an old lady. Yes, I am. [0:09] >> I’ve seen you say that you believe [0:10] you are forever twelve years old. [0:13] >> I am indeed. [0:17] >> So I don't quite understand. I saw you [0:21] once recall—and I found it amazing— [0:23] that you still remember being a little [0:25] over one year old, when your father [0:27] brought you a box of food. [0:31] >> Yes. [0:33] >> And the immense shock and joy you felt. [0:36] >> Yes. [0:36] >> When was that? [0:38] >> That's because I was very short and [0:40] small, so the box seemed so big to me. [0:44] A huge box filled with love for me. My [0:48] father told me—he was joking, of [0:50] course I didn't know—he said this was [0:52] all for you. When I saw that this world [0:57] , this endless world, was full of [0:59] delicious things, I was, of course, [1:01] happy beyond words. That is to say, I [1:08] have always been love. Even though it [1:15] is ancient art history, you call it [1:17] private art, yet you see the breath of [1:19] the ancients inside it. [1:22] >> The breath of the great universe that [1:24] the ancients painted is what they [1:25] perceived. And I feel that perhaps that [1:29] is simply [1:30] >> what the Chinese call "Li"(ritual/order [1:32] ). [1:33] >> Ah. [1:37] >> What foreigners call God, that person [1:39] with a white head, that bird. [1:44] >> Ah, you know what kind of bird that is? [1:47] >> It’s because I feel the hair on the [1:49] back of its head is white. [1:52] >> Actually, a topic I really want to talk [1:54] to you about is the act of looking. [1:57] >> Look at us here today, feeling how [1:59] tranquil it is, with birds chirping. [2:03] Sometimes I think back to when I [2:04] traveled as a child, the first time I [2:06] came to Hangzhou with my mother. [2:09] >> Back then, there were no mobile phones, [2:10] and people only had film cameras, which [2:12] had just become available, so we didn't [2:14] really know how to use them. My mother [2:16] took photos of me. When she took the [2:17] photos, she even put the film in [2:19] backwards, and she didn't even know it. [2:21] Back then, everyone traveled and tried [2:23] to capture things in such a clumsy way. [2:25] But now, everywhere we go, we just snap [2:27] photos like this, right? Yet, sometimes [2:29] I feel that I’m not really seeing [2:31] anything. [2:32] >> Mhm. [2:34] >> This year, in an art gallery in Milan, [2:36] there was a pianist playing in front of [2:38] a massive painting. [2:40] >> Uh-huh. I was sitting in the front row, [2:42] and he played for half an hour. You [2:44] can't look at your phone, right? You [2:46] have to put it aside; you can't look at [2:48] your phone. [2:49] >> Where do your eyes go then? Your eyes [2:50] can only look at that painting. [2:52] >> That huge painting was of St. Mark's [2:54] Square, it was... [2:56] >> Oh. [2:58] >> Yes, in that place in Italy, in Venice, [3:00] it has a bit of imagination in it; on [3:01] one side is the appearance of the [3:03] Muslims at the time when they arrived [3:05] here, and on the other is the Christian [3:07] side—a massive painting. I kept my [3:10] eyes fixed on that painting, looking at [3:12] it for half an hour. Hmm. [3:13] >> Suddenly, I saw something completely [3:15] different; it was as if things inside [3:17] the painting were sparkling. [3:19] >> Then the figures seemed alive, and [3:21] every line—there was a leash with [3:23] someone walking a dog—if I had just [3:24] taken a quick glance, I definitely [3:26] wouldn't have seen it, but having [3:28] looked for so long, I did. [3:29] >> Including the expressions on everyone's [3:31] faces; I felt as if I had stepped into [3:32] the painting itself. [3:33] >> Oh. [3:34] >> And I thought that feeling was so [3:36] magical. When I came out, I shared it [3:37] with the person next to me, and he said [3:39] , "I saw it too; I also felt like those [3:41] people were talking to me." [3:42] >> Later, I spoke with the museum director [3:44] , and he said, "Exactly." He said, "You [3:46] must not have spent such a long time [3:48] with your eyes fixed on an object for a [3:49] very long time." [3:50] >> Right. [3:51] >> He said, "I train the people at our [3:53] museum," [3:53] >> Hmm, " [3:54] >> Each time, we only pick one painting." [3:56] >> Uh-huh. "Sit there, sit for half an [3:59] hour or an hour; you are not allowed to [4:01] walk around, you can't, you must look [4:02] at it quietly like this." It just feels [4:04] like the eyes of people today—I [4:06] sometimes think of a poem, "My heart is [4:08] like the wood of a blind man"—my eyes [4:10] are like blind people's eyes, that is. [4:13] >> We look, but we don't see; we look, [4:16] >> but we don't see. Yes. Do you have that [4:19] feeling? [4:19] >> I don't have that feeling. [4:21] >> No, you certainly don't, but you...but [4:24] you know, why are you able to see? [4:27] Because I look, I look, I keep looking [4:30] and I feel with my skin. I feel with my [4:33] soul. I'm curious as to how you are [4:36] able to see. Open up your inner self. [4:39] >> Well, I don't look very quickly. I read [4:42] books very, very slowly, too. So when [4:45] someone writes me a letter, it takes me [4:47] a long time to finish reading it. I eat [4:50] very slowly, too. Too slow, perhaps, so [4:56] I can change it a bit. [5:04] >> Professor Xiao Hu, we were on the boat [5:06] this morning [5:07] >> for the whole morning, and now, let me [5:10] introduce a new friend to you, hmm, [5:12] >> Professor Zhang Yue. Hello, Professor [5:14] Zhang. Hello, Professor Xiao Hu. Even [5:17] before I knew you, I had already seen [5:19] so many people in my circle of friends [5:21] praising you. [5:23] >> And they said you are a very legendary [5:24] woman, [5:26] >> saying that you are a role model for [5:27] children, and that they want to use you [5:29] to educate their children. [5:31] >> That's right. [5:32] >> That's right. [5:33] >> That's true. Because I am just a child. [5:38] Just an old child. Because I have [5:42] intentionally not grown up. [5:44] >> Mm. [5:44] >> Intentionally trying hard not to grow [5:46] up. [5:46] >> Very intentionally, yes. [5:48] >> We shouldn't try to educate adults, [5:49] should we? Educate adults—we all live [5:52] too much like adults. [5:53] >> I was thinking last night that you were [5:55] giving a lecture last night, right? [5:57] >> Yes. [5:58] >> I thought, tomorrow morning they have [6:00] to travel by boat and film, and [6:01] tomorrow afternoon we have to talk. How [6:04] can a 90-year-old handle this work pace [6:06] ? But it's no problem, right? [6:09] >> No, not for me. [6:12] >> Just now, all the way here, I kept [6:13] telling our staff to make sure Mr. Wu [6:15] didn't have to walk over. [6:17] >> I asked if he could take a boat, and [6:19] later they sent me a photo. You had [6:21] already walked over with your hands [6:23] behind your back. Truly, when I see you [6:25] , I feel like your age has nothing to [6:27] do with it. [6:28] >> Mm. [6:29] >> I think so too. My body isn't actually [6:32] as fast as my soul. [6:34] >> Mm. [6:35] >> For instance, I love the wind. So I [6:38] walk fast to feel the wind, but my [6:40] heart can't take it, I have to catch my [6:42] breath. [6:44] >> So my body has to stop, and then I run [6:47] again. [6:48] >> When I was coming over just now, I was [6:49] imagining you on the way. [6:51] >> Mm. [6:51] >> I thought, Mr. Wu must be really [6:53] enjoying the ride while coming in by [6:55] boat. [6:55] >> Very, very much enjoying it. [6:57] >> Right, and then I compared that to what [6:59] I was thinking while I was on the boat. [7:01] >> Mm. [7:02] >> The scenery is really nice. Oh, this [7:04] interview location is well-chosen. I [7:07] wonder if Zhou Jun has finished the [7:09] interview outline. What angles will he [7:11] talk about? [7:13] >> Mm. [7:13] >> Oh, I'm not an art major, I don't know [7:15] much about painting, it'll be terrible [7:16] if the talk doesn't go well. I have a [7:18] meeting in Beijing tomorrow afternoon, [7:20] I hope the flight isn't delayed. [7:21] >> I think even more than you do. I almost [7:23] couldn't sleep last night. See. [7:26] >> So later I realized why I am already [7:28] exhausted before I even start—because [7:30] I have worried about so many things [7:31] along the way. [7:33] >> Oh my, you poor thing. Do you usually [7:36] worry about things? Or do you never [7:38] worry at all? [7:39] >> I don't have to worry. [7:40] >> Mm, Mr. Wu can sleep anywhere. I truly [7:43] admire that. He said he can even sleep [7:45] at an immigration office, leaning his [7:47] chin on the counter. [7:49] >> That’s just how it is. They check and [7:52] check, and I just wait and wait and [7:53] wait, and then I fall asleep. Then they [7:56] say it's done and I can leave. [7:58] >> So, why does he have energy? Because he [8:01] doesn't have internal friction. His [8:02] heart is just very direct and simple. [8:04] It is what it is. If he's happy, he [8:07] says he's happy. If he doesn't want to [8:09] do something, he says he won't. Why are [8:11] we always so tired? I think it's [8:13] because our hearts are filled with [8:14] hesitation, anxiety, self-doubt, [8:16] impatience, and worry, that’s why you [8:18] feel especially tired, right? [8:20] >> Ah. [8:20] >> Mm. [8:21] >> Adults like being like this. [8:22] >> Mm. [8:23] >> Mm. [8:24] >> Because adults are stupid. [8:28] >> Adults are stupid; I discovered that [8:30] when I was a child. So I decided I [8:32] didn't want to become an adult. [8:35] >> How, how did you discover that adults [8:37] are stupid? [8:38] >> The things they say don't make any [8:40] sense. And when they talk to each other [8:43] , I can tell there's no meaning in it. [8:46] The mutual... [8:47] >> All that small talk and such. [8:50] >> Adults think small talk is actually [8:52] good; it helps us avoid trouble. [8:54] >> Mm. [8:56] >> It might actually invite even more [8:57] trouble. Yes, and adults worry about [9:00] what others think of them. [9:03] >> Children don't worry about that. I am [9:05] who I am. If you don't like me, we can [9:07] have a fight and see what happens. [9:09] >> For a long time, my child would say to [9:11] me, "Why do you adults talk as soon as [9:13] you meet?" He found talking especially [9:15] annoying. I asked, "Then what do you do [9:16] ?" He said, "We just play when we meet. [9:18] "" [9:19] >> Talking," he said, "you are all so [9:20] boring." [9:21] >> Right, because he can hear that what [9:23] you're saying is meaningless. It’s [9:26] fake. Useless words spoken out. [9:29] >> We, we study serious matters. [9:33] >> But by acting like a child and being so [9:35] direct, haven't you caused yourself a [9:37] lot of trouble? Yes, not letting me [9:41] lecture, not inviting me to speak, not [9:44] publishing my articles, or whatever— [9:46] but that's their problem, not mine. I [9:49] wrote it. [9:51] >> I did, I did what I felt I should do. [9:54] As for how people treat it afterward, [9:56] that’s their problem. [9:58] >> You never have a burden in your heart, [9:59] right? You don't think about... [10:01] >> Once this book came out, I had no more [10:03] burden. That "Forgotten True Self" was [10:06] actually my doctoral thesis. Mm, I just [10:09] wrote it for my professors. At that [10:12] time, I was already 50. I was in my 30s [10:15] when I started writing it, and when I [10:17] finished, it wasn't accepted. Forgotten [10:21] ... [10:21] >> The "Forgotten True Self" book, your [10:23] doctoral thesis, is actually a shocking [10:25] thing. When we hear this story, I also [10:27] feel particularly stunned. Most people [10:30] don't have the courage to look at this. [10:31] For example, when you went to the [10:33] Taipei Palace Museum, [10:34] >> and researched Wu Zhen, the pride of [10:36] the Taipei Palace Museum, because they [10:38] claim to have his authentic works. [10:40] >> Mm. [10:41] >> Then, after careful research and [10:43] comparison, you said they are basically [10:44] all fake, there aren't many real ones. [10:47] >> This result. I think this result is [10:49] like flipping over the table. [10:50] >> Mm, I... [10:51] >> I believe the Palace Museum must have [10:53] been furious. [10:54] >> They just wouldn't let me examine their [10:56] paintings anymore. [10:57] >> So, they didn't let you conduct [10:59] research there, right? [11:00] >> Well, when I went there, the first [11:02] director happened to be German. He was [11:05] the witness at my parents 'wedding in [11:06] Nanjing. My mother was German, and his [11:09] name was John Ferguson. [11:11] >> Mm-hmm. He asked, "Little Hu, do you [11:14] think we have any fake paintings here?" [11:16] I said yes. He said, "That's great! Now [11:20] we have something to research. Tell me [11:22] which ones are fake." I told him, " [11:24] Actually, I'm looking for the genuine [11:26] ones; there are very few." He said, " [11:28] Then we have work to do." I said, "Yes, [11:31] we do." Later, the next director saw me [11:35] and said, "Professor Hsu, I heard you [11:37] said we have fakes in the Palace Museum [11:39] ." I said, "Yes, but every collection [11:44] has fakes." [11:45] >> Mm-hmm. [11:47] >> He said, "If you say we have fakes, we [11:49] won't keep your book in our archives."" [11:52] >> We won't sell your books." [11:54] >> In other words, you're not welcome here [11:55] . Mm-hmm. [11:58] >> So, across all of Taiwan—NTU, Normal [12:01] University—no school invited me to [12:03] speak. You say we have fakes? No one is [12:08] interested. It's strange, no one is [12:11] interested. It's not a matter of [12:16] colleagues being biased; I thought I [12:18] should debate this with you. [12:22] >> They just pretended I didn't exist. One [12:25] year passed, then another year passed. [12:27] Genuine works are indeed rare. I've [12:30] thought about this issue. It’s truly [12:31] terrible, but what's not terrible is [12:34] that genuine works do exist. That's the [12:36] first thing. Second, their level is so [12:38] incredibly high. The artistic level [12:42] they achieved is metaphysical— [12:44] something other countries' art hasn't [12:46] reached. So, I feel quite proud that we [12:51] at least have five pieces of this kind [12:53] from the Northern Song. [12:56] >> Only five? [12:59] >> Only five, that's right, Song. [13:03] >> Professor Hu means that when emperors [13:04] throughout history collected these [13:06] items, some were already fakes, because [13:08] fakes were already being produced [13:09] during that same era. [13:10] >> Emperor Taizong of Tang wanted Wang [13:12] Xizhi’s works; Emperor Qianlong [13:14] wanted them too. [13:16] >> He wanted palace originals and things [13:18] like that. But to get a painter who [13:22] died 400 years ago is extremely [13:24] difficult. [13:27] >> So they collected them; these two [13:28] emperors wanted to show they were very [13:30] "Han," that they understood Han culture [13:32] , so many things they collected were [13:34] works attributed to famous people. They [13:37] just stamped their seals on them. [13:39] Actually, in the past, for us, this [13:41] served as proof: Qianlong had seen it, [13:43] Qianlong had stamped the imperial seal, [13:45] saying it was a painting from the [13:47] Northern Song, so it must be authentic. [13:49] Because Emperor Qianlong had commented [13:51] on it. But he was a man of the 18th [13:53] century; how could he possibly know? [13:56] >> Because we tend to validate and worship [13:58] the ancients, as well as high-ranking [14:00] figures like emperors, there is a lot [14:02] of blind worship involved that actually [14:04] has little to do with the object itself [14:06] . Yes, they may have had great power, [14:09] but their knowledge wasn't necessarily [14:11] as great. [14:12] >> Isn't that kind of speculation quite [14:14] interesting? Even in academic [14:15] discussions, putting forward a [14:17] different opinion is very interesting. [14:19] >> But history already has its established [14:21] conclusions, and you just come along [14:22] and flip the table. Doesn't this happen [14:25] a lot in art history as well? Before, [14:28] they talked about that painting, the " [14:30] Court Ladies of the Guo State," only to [14:32] discover that the main figure wasn't [14:34] who we always thought it was, but [14:36] rather the one dressed in men's [14:37] clothing—that's the Tang dynasty [14:39] piece by Zhang Xuan, right? Everyone [14:43] used to say that was the Lady of Guo, [14:45] assuming it was the woman in the middle [14:47] , but then someone suggested that the [14:49] man in front was actually the lady—a [14:50] liberated Tang woman who dressed as a [14:52] man because she was tall and imposing, [14:54] so she was the one. That doesn't really [14:57] matter, as either way it's just [14:59] guessing and doesn't affect the value [15:00] of the painting, but if someone were to [15:02] come out now and say it’s not from [15:04] the Tang dynasty at all, that it's a [15:05] fake from the Ming dynasty... [15:07] >> Hmm. [15:07] >> Then it's madness, I think it's just [15:09] madness. That's exactly what he's doing [15:11] . [15:11] >> So everyone is going crazy. [15:14] >> I am, it's a bit difficult, so I can [15:16] see whether there are fake paintings. [15:19] >> Hmm. I sat in that museum without walls [15:27] or glass, where you can touch the [15:29] paintings, so I sat there—there were [15:31] about five or six of them in total. Two [15:38] were genuine, the others were not. Do [15:41] you use that same analytical method of [15:42] brushwork to look at them? [15:43] >> Yes. [15:44] >> Ah, this doesn't just apply to Chinese [15:45] landscapes; it applies to foreign [15:47] paintings too. [15:47] >> Is that so? You can use this method for [15:49] foreign paintings as well? This [15:50] approach. [15:50] >> Well, of course, it's even simpler, [15:53] much simpler. [15:53] >> Oh. [15:54] >> They are not painted correctly! If in [15:57] 1515 you could paint hair that was so [16:00] complex, how could you paint such [16:02] clumsy hands and such ugly feet in 1517 [16:04] ? It’s not possible. They would say, [16:07] "Oh, the color is like that because he [16:09] was in Italy, he changed his colors, [16:11] they were more muted." But your [16:13] technique wouldn't regress, right? I [16:16] mean, the fingers don't look like [16:18] fingers, and the toes don't look like [16:20] toes—they’re painted quite poorly. [16:22] >> Yes, Wang Qixian once said that [16:24] brushwork is a person's—or rather, an [16:26] artist's—voice. It's their voice; [16:28] just as no matter how much our faces [16:30] might change, once you speak, people [16:32] know it's you. He feels this can't be [16:34] changed. When Chen Nanqing mentioned [16:37] you, he said his work is actually [16:39] extremely long and arduous. He has to [16:43] look at every stroke and every splash [16:45] of ink, study them repeatedly, compare [16:47] and measure them, and then determine [16:48] their authenticity. [16:51] >> That’s right. [16:52] >> It’s an extremely dull and difficult [16:54] job. [16:55] >> It's not just intuition; you actually [16:57] have to train your eyes, constantly [16:59] looking and analyzing. [17:01] >> Right, so he says it's fun. Because [17:04] looking at art is a very interesting [17:05] thing. [17:06] >> Mm. [17:07] >> You will discover things. You will be [17:10] moved, and it’s actually just fun. [17:13] >> Mm. [17:15] >> So that’s work I really, really enjoy [17:17] doing. That’s why I’ll look at it [17:20] in the middle of the night, or if I [17:21] suddenly think of something at night, [17:23] I’ll open my computer and check. [17:25] It’s interesting because I don’t [17:27] need to submit a report; no one is [17:28] asking me to prove anything. It’s not [17:32] really about proving; I just want to [17:33] find out what is what, that’s all. [17:37] >> Because I’ve liked being a detective [17:38] since I was a child. [17:39] >> Now I’ve finally become a detective [17:41] of paintings. [17:42] >> That’s right, exactly. [17:43] >> Speaking of your childhood, we’ve [17:45] prepared a little surprise for you. It [17:47] has a bit to do with your childhood. [17:49] >> I recognize this, as a Beijinger—oh! [17:53] >> Do you recognize it? [17:54] >> I do, it's Aiwo-wo! [17:56] >> That's right. [17:57] >> Oh, how wonderful. [17:58] >> Shipped all the way from Beijing. [17:59] >> Thank you, thank you all. [18:01] >> But I don't know if it's the same as [18:03] when you were a child, because the [18:04] Aiwo-wo I had growing up was always [18:06] filled with white sugar and sesame. [18:08] >> Many Aiwo-wo today are made with red [18:10] bean paste. [18:11] >> Why? [18:12] >> I don't know, maybe they think red bean [18:13] paste tastes better, so they changed it [18:15] . So, I don't know—I’m actually [18:17] worse off than you. Until yesterday, I [18:19] thought the thing I grew up with was [18:21] Aiwo-wo, but it was actually Wotou. [18:22] >> Ah, you southerner, you southerner! [18:24] >> I always thought that thing was Aiwo-wo [18:25] , so when I read that part in your book [18:26] , I thought, "What's so good about [18:27] Aiwo-wo? Isn't it just a Wotou?" You [18:29] described it as being like a cloud, and [18:30] I thought, "But isn't it yellow?" [18:31] >> Mm. I want to eat the one with the [18:33] sesame. [18:33] >> White sugar filling—white sugar and [18:35] sesame. [18:35] >> Sesame. [18:36] >> Mm. Right? [18:37] >> Don't say "white sugar" too loudly. [18:39] >> Oh, why? [18:41] >> Because Sabrina can hear. She doesn't [18:43] want me eating sugar. It’s the sesame [18:45] filling. [18:46] >> Go ahead and eat this. [18:47] >> This one. Mm. [18:48] >> Okay, you all should eat some too. [18:50] >> Delicious. Mm. [18:51] >> Alright. [18:52] >> Alright. What's the filling? [18:54] >> Red bean paste. [18:55] >> Candied orange peel and shredded melon. [18:56] It has sugar, candied orange peel, and [18:58] shredded melon. Yes. [18:59] >> This flavor is different. [19:00] >> Southerners always touch my head when [19:02] they try our Beijing ones. [19:03] >> Alright, alright, thank you. [19:06] >> But the dough being rice is correct. [19:08] >> Mm. Yes, glutinous rice. [19:10] >> In Beijing, there are fake ones. [19:13] >> That's when they've turned the rice [19:15] into flour, [19:16] >> making it very soft and elastic; [19:18] that’s not the real deal. [19:21] >> I thought that was called a bean bun. [19:23] >> What kind of messy bean bun is that? [19:25] >> What on earth are these things? [19:28] >> Mm. [19:32] >> Added a grain of rice on top. [19:34] >> Let me help you. I’ve got it, I’ll [19:36] do it, okay, it’s done, no worries. I [19:41] once went to a place with my daughter [19:43] to paint. Does she like to paint? They [19:45] give you a white canvas, and you just [19:46] go for it. [19:47] >> Mm. [19:48] >> I think one thing that makes children [19:49] different is that they don’t hesitate [19:51] . [19:51] >> That’s true. [19:52] >> They just paint, they don’t have any [19:53] concept of whether it's good or not, [19:55] none at all. [19:55] >> Right. [19:56] >> I just sit there. Right, I paint a [19:58] little, "No, that's wrong," I smear it, [20:00] smear it, smear it again, wipe it off, [20:01] wipe it off, and in the end, I say it's [20:03] a joke, so I just paint it black and [20:05] write gold characters, because you’re [20:07] constantly correcting yourself. [20:09] >> Oh. [20:10] >> I was thinking about what you said just [20:12] now, about this inner eye being opened [20:14] to feel things. [20:17] >> Maybe yours has never been closed, [20:19] never been covered up. [20:22] >> No, because I was very conscious of it [20:24] when I moved from the mountains to [20:26] Shanghai. I felt it was fake because [20:31] walking there makes strange noises; in [20:33] the mountains, you can’t hear [20:34] anything while walking. [20:38] >> Mm. [20:39] >> When it rains in the mountains, you can [20:41] smell the scent of the earth. [20:43] >> When it rains in Taiwan, in Shanghai, [20:45] you can't smell anything. [20:47] >> It's just that city vibe. [20:49] >> Everything is completely fake, and all [20:51] I saw were adults. My mother would be [20:53] talking to her friends. They were using [20:56] meaningless words. Then they wanted me [20:58] to play the piano for them to listen to [21:00] . [21:01] >> I started playing. [21:04] >> And they just started talking. [21:06] >> Oh. [21:07] >> They weren't listening at all. So I [21:09] left. I thought, "You guys don't [21:11] understand music at all," so I stopped [21:13] playing. [21:15] >> You always felt adults were [21:16] particularly fake, and they were always [21:18] thinking about other things; I saw that [21:20] even with first-grade children. I [21:23] skipped a grade, and when I transferred [21:25] to Nankai, I realized I really didn't [21:27] like the school I went to. They weren't [21:32] thinking about the state of the nation; [21:33] they were thinking about boyfriends and [21:35] glass stockings—that’s what we [21:36] called them back then. [21:40] >> Nylons, right? [21:41] >> It's nylon. [21:42] >> Uh-huh. [21:42] >> But those glass stockings back then, [21:44] they wouldn't break, you know. [21:45] >> They just wouldn't wear out. My mother [21:47] used to wear them, and they never broke [21:49] ; she could wear the same pair for [21:51] years. Later, the company realized that [21:53] wasn't making them any money, so they [21:55] started making them worse, and they’d [21:57] tear at the slightest touch. [21:59] >> Mm. [22:01] >> Anyway, I really, really don't like [22:03] this kind of phoniness. And I would [22:08] dream about the mountains. When I woke [22:12] up in the morning, my pillow would be [22:14] soaked. I’d be crying, missing the [22:19] wild mountains, the wild trees, the [22:21] pines, and the azaleas—there were no [22:23] paths, you could just wander through [22:26] them—and I’d feel so, so sad. Then [22:33] I’d think about this fake city, the [22:35] fake conversations, the fake melancholy [22:37] , the fake everything, so when the moon [22:39] came out, I’d kneel down and swear to [22:41] the moon that I wouldn't grow past [22:42] twelve years old. [22:46] >> Mm. [22:47] >> I don’t want a life past the age of [22:49] twelve. My body can grow old until I [22:53] die, but my heart won't. [22:55] >> Peter Pan, you are. [22:57] >> I don't want to be 12. [23:00] >> Actually, it’s because you never left [23:02] that core. [23:03] >> That's right. [23:04] >> You chose not to leave that behind. [23:06] >> Yes. Very persistent. Yeah. We might [23:13] feel there is a set of rules, a set of [23:14] regulations, and if you follow them, [23:16] everything seems to become easier [23:18] because you can gain the respect others [23:20] give back to you. Because sometimes we [23:23] seem to really believe in these "names" [23:25] —like, "I graduated from this school, [23:27] " which implies... [23:29] >> I'll have a good job in the future, [23:31] I'll be this or that; and this world, [23:33] perhaps compared to your era, is [23:34] spinning more and more according to [23:36] these rules. So everyone thinks, "If I [23:39] can get those things recognized by [23:41] everyone within these rules, I will [23:43] succeed, I will be something." [23:48] >> Take looking at art, for example—we [23:50] are always told who the masters are and [23:52] what the world-famous paintings are [23:53] before we ever even see them, right? If [23:59] you don't know these names, you feel [24:01] ashamed. [24:02] >> Yes, that’s exactly it. That’s why [24:06] we published a book called*Art History [24:08] Without Masters*, because why are we so [24:10] obsessed with "masters"? And so many, [24:13] many people were surprised. They’d [24:16] say, "This thing is so good," and then [24:17] the person's name would be revealed. We [24:21] say to each other that they paint [24:23] exceptionally well, but if we look at a [24:25] big-name artist's work and it's [24:26] terribly ugly, Chinese people get [24:28] scared. They say, "I just don't get it. [24:32] " Actually, that's false. They don't [24:34] understand, meaning you might say, " [24:36] They say this is famous calligraphy by [24:38] Su Dongpo, so why is it like this?""I [24:40] don't find it comfortable to look at."" [24:42] Comfortable." [24:43] >> You'll feel it's your own problem; if I [24:45] don't think it's good, is it my problem [24:47] , right? [24:47] >> Chinese people often think it's their [24:49] own fault because they don't understand [24:50] . So I tell everyone, it's not you; [24:53] when you eat food and say it's not good [24:55] , it's just your taste. Right? If you [24:58] don't like it, you know it immediately. [25:01] >> If someone says it was made by a famous [25:03] chef or that it's a signature dish, you [25:05] might think, "Oh, maybe my palate is [25:07] just not refined enough." You might ask [25:10] why it's so expensive when it only [25:11] looks good. [25:13] >> So it's your own experience with the [25:15] painting. It has nothing to do with the [25:18] name. If the food is delicious, no [25:23] matter what it's called—even if it [25:25] has some Arabic name I can't pronounce [25:27] —my preference, whether I like it or [25:29] not, is my right and my responsibility [25:31] to determine. Only then do you ask, "Oh [25:35] , what's this artist's name? Why is it [25:38] so good?" You have the right to say so. [25:41] "Oh, this is by the famous Dong Yuan? [25:44] But I don't think it looks good." And [25:47] people might say, "That's because [25:49] you're stupid," and you can just say, " [25:51] Yes, I am indeed stupid." [25:54] >> But looking at this, because I see that [25:56] you train your students... [25:58] >> Mm. [25:58] >> For example, you tell them not to read [26:00] books, it's forbidden to read books, [26:02] right? [26:02] >> Just go and feel the painting directly, [26:04] but... [26:06] >> If I am someone who knows nothing about [26:08] art history and has never known what [26:09] paintings are, should I have some [26:11] preparation, or should I go see it [26:12] without any preparation at all? Well, [26:15] do you need to prepare anything to eat [26:17] a meal? Like brushing your teeth or [26:19] something? Do you need to eat something [26:20] else before you eat your meal? No, it's [26:23] a... [26:24] >> Direct, straightforward. [26:25] >> One-on-one relationship. [26:27] >> If a person without any preparation [26:28] sees something good, but can't [26:30] articulate where the goodness lies, or [26:32] is it that... [26:32] >> Why must they articulate it? [26:34] >> Mm. [26:35] >> They can say, "I really like it.""Don't [26:38] walk away, I want to look at it a bit [26:39] longer." Or, "How much longer do I have [26:42] to wait? I'm bored, I want to leave." [26:45] These are two different reactions, and [26:47] these are the real reactions. This has [26:50] nothing to do with the brain; it has to [26:52] do with the heart. Looking at these [26:56] trees, I can say, "Well, I like all [26:58] these trees, but I prefer to look at [26:59] this one longer." You can do that. That [27:04] is my right. [27:05] >> Mm. Are you asking a silly adult's [27:09] question? Did you prepare anything? Are [27:12] there any hurdles to overcome? It was [27:14] direct. You fell in love with your [27:16] husband, did you see that? I fainted. [27:18] When he saw you, he fainted. That’s [27:21] when someone introduces you, saying you [27:23] must meet this person because they are [27:25] so rich, or so poor, or their father is [27:27] some high official—but that wasn't it [27:29] . [27:30] >> But you still studied art history, [27:32] isn't that nice? I thought it was about [27:35] living art. I thought it was "China and [27:38] art," because back then I didn't know [27:40] Chinese art was about dead people, [27:42] rather than us painting things that [27:44] look Chinese. We happened to live next [27:48] to the university, so I thought, maybe [27:50] a PhD is a way to make money, a [27:52] threshold to cross. I decided to get a [27:56] PhD, and when I saw "China" in the ABCs [27:58] , I was thrilled—I hadn't spoken [28:01] Chinese for 20 years. I thought I could [28:04] go home. And the first letter was "A" [28:06] for "art." I thought it was great, but [28:08] I didn't realize it was entirely about [28:10] reading and looking at dead people's [28:12] work. [28:13] >> But you don't like the work of living [28:14] people either; you have a lot of [28:16] criticism for contemporary art, too. [28:17] >> This contemporary era is just wrong. [28:19] >> Hmm. I don't think this era is suitable [28:23] for creation because everyone is so [28:25] pessimistic. People focus not on the [28:32] soul, but on things beneath the body— [28:34] like AI, or what we produce, even [28:36] leaving it to AI to replace humans. [28:42] >> Human replacements have already taken [28:44] the stage, so it’s a world completely [28:46] devoid of soul. I used to look at [28:49] contemporary art, and many people say [28:51] they don't understand it. You look at a [28:54] pile of things and rush to find the [28:56] plaque next to it to explain what it is [28:57] . [28:59] >> Later, after seeing so much of it, my [29:01] own feeling is that... [29:04] >> Good work perhaps doesn't need any [29:05] explanation. [29:06] >> That's right. [29:07] >> I don't need to find that plaque to [29:09] tell me what it's saying. [29:10] >> It just has that... [29:11] >> Even if you don't know what concept [29:12] it's talking about, if you see it and [29:14] feel you like it and want to linger a [29:15] bit longer, that should be good. [29:17] >> Exactly, yes. Someone once argued with [29:19] me, saying, "What’s the point of [29:20] putting a small battery on a belly?" I [29:22] said, "True, but it makes you feel [29:24] surprised, doesn't it? Why did they put [29:26] it there?" It’s a surprise, and then [29:28] you start to think. My point is, it [29:30] must first evoke a direct reaction from [29:32] you. [29:33] >> Exactly. But for that kind of thing, I [29:35] wouldn't stay too long. I think it's [29:37] just scholars—stupid scholars. [29:39] >> Hmm. [29:40] >> They’ve been fooled by it. [29:41] >> Hmm. We could also just hang up a [29:46] urinal and call it "Lü's Urine." [29:49] >> Hmm. [29:49] >> Right? [29:50] >> It can't be done a second time. [29:53] >> I'd have Duchamp's name on it. If I put [29:57] a urinal that no one had ever peed in [29:59] on display, that wouldn't be very [30:01] interesting, right? It's only to call [30:05] attention to me, to my rebellion of [30:07] spirit, but it doesn't show my art. [30:10] >> Mm. [30:11] >> So, adults are just foolish. Foolish [30:15] adults are convinced by these things [30:17] and go to attend these exhibitions or [30:19] whatnot. [30:24] >> I feel that art history books keep [30:26] putting Duchamp there, saying this [30:27] thing is modern art, but that's the [30:29] downfall of modern art. It can begin [30:35] the fall from art; you no longer have [30:37] art. It's just an idea. [30:39] >> Mm. [30:40] >> That's not art. [30:41] >> Mm. [30:42] >> For me, I feel art is a substitute for [30:45] religion. [30:46] >> Uh-huh. [30:47] >> It is a communication of the soul, like [30:49] listening to music. [30:50] >> Mm. [30:51] >> When you listen to music, you can be [30:53] moved to tears. And after you finish [30:58] listening to this music, you are [31:00] completely changed, because you have [31:02] heard Beethoven, you have heard Bach. [31:08] Afterward, you will grow in certain [31:10] ways. [31:11] >> Perhaps you aren't even aware of it. [31:13] >> You grow, but you might not even know [31:15] you've grown. [31:18] >> Whether you've had this experience or [31:20] not, your worldview changes. Speaking [31:29] of your childhood, since your father [31:30] was a staff member at the Nationalist [31:32] government's embassy in Italy, you [31:34] lived in Italy for a few years when you [31:36] were very young, right? [31:38] >> Unfortunately, when World War II broke [31:40] out, Italy was in the same camp as [31:42] Germany and Japan. They were in the [31:44] opposing camp to China. [31:45] >> So you had to leave the embassy and [31:46] return to the country. [31:47] >> Mm. You spent your teenage years in [31:51] Chongqing, which must have been a [31:52] particularly difficult period in [31:54] Chinese history, the War of Resistance. [31:57] Chongqing was the temporary capital, [31:59] enduring heavy bombing every day. This [32:02] very turbulent childhood, what kind of [32:04] influence do you think it had on your [32:06] childhood? [32:09] >> In Italy, there were nannies and [32:11] servants. So I was very supervised. Mm. [32:18] >> In Chongqing, we lived in the mountains [32:21] . [32:22] >> I went to school with my classmates, [32:24] and they called me "Yang Pozi"(Foreign [32:26] Granny). " [32:27] >> Yang Pozi,""Yang Pozi," actually " [32:30] Yellow Yang Pozi." [32:32] >> Because my hair was a bit curly, you [32:35] see. [32:36] >> And it was a bit reddish too. But I [32:38] said I am Chinese; I am Chinese! When [32:42] everyone had to hide in air-raid [32:44] shelters during those bombings, I would [32:46] sneak out because no one knew I had [32:48] slipped away, and I’d go back to the [32:50] mountains. [32:52] >> Weren't you afraid of the bombs? You [32:53] ran out of the air-raid shelter all by [32:55] yourself. [32:56] >> There were planes; I was counting the [32:58] Japanese planes. They were looking for [33:00] Chongqing. They couldn't find Chongqing [33:03] because Chongqing was completely [33:05] covered in fog, so although Chongqing [33:07] was bombed, it wasn't... [33:10] >> It wasn't really harmed too severely. [33:12] The children weren't afraid? [33:14] >> No, we weren't afraid at all. [33:16] >> I feel that with this displaced life, [33:18] when you asked about the impact, my [33:20] first thought was that you learned so [33:22] many languages, all kinds of languages. [33:25] Secondly, looking at your memories, I [33:26] get the sense that although you had two [33:28] parents, they didn't really supervise [33:30] you much; your father was busy with [33:32] work, and your mother couldn't manage [33:34] things, so perhaps you were freed from [33:36] that kind of restraint. [33:38] >> And so much of your happiness came from [33:40] counting shadows on the road by [33:42] yourself—finding great joy in [33:44] solitude. In your recollections, [33:47] despite the displacement, I don't sense [33:49] any shadow of suffering. [33:53] >> The road, the road home was actually [33:55] just one—below our mountain peak was [33:57] a slope, and there was a rock under a [33:59] pine tree; I would sit on that rock and [34:01] look down the mountain, looking at the [34:04] distant sandbars. Watching the Jialing [34:09] River shimmering in the sun, you could [34:12] see it sparkling, so sitting there all [34:14] by myself was very, very happy. [34:19] >> I would think of my father, and then [34:20] listen to see if I could hear their [34:22] voices, just that. [34:24] >> It’s as if the whole world belongs to [34:26] you alone. [34:26] >> Yes, that's right. That is wonderful; I [34:30] believe that every parent should give [34:32] their child a space of their own. [34:38] >> A space that is off-limits; let the [34:40] children go there, don't bother them, [34:42] just let them live in their own world. [34:48] It’s very important. Behind my house, [34:52] there was a patch of land where they [34:54] would throw the ashes from the stove; [34:56] it was a hillside. So, on top, there [35:01] were vines—how do you say "vine"? [35:04] >> Grapes. [35:04] >> Vines, yes. I could grab the vine and [35:08] swing like Tarzan, but when I fell, [35:09] I’d fall right into the ashes. [35:12] >> Only mountain children could do that. [35:14] >> That's true. [35:14] >> You really were a wild child when you [35:16] were little. I was wild, yes. Alone, I [35:19] would imagine I was there to defeat [35:21] Japanese imperialism, just like that, I [35:23] defeated Japanese imperialism. [35:25] >> Defeated them, I stomped them under the [35:27] water. [35:28] >> Hmm, a young girl's brave, imagined [35:30] patriotism. But we were also like you [35:32] when we were small—playing foolishly, [35:35] having silly fun, not understanding any [35:37] rules, and not knowing how to read [35:38] people's expressions. Everyone is like [35:41] that as a child, but gradually you have [35:43] to be trained. Yes, slowly you get [35:46] molded. [35:46] >> Right, others will educate you. [35:48] >> You don't have to listen, though. [35:49] >> You don't dare not to listen; you end [35:51] up thinking the adults are right. [35:52] >> There’s a price for not listening. [35:54] >> Yeah, for example, your parents would [35:56] say it like this. You're a [35:57] laughingstock, a girl acting like that. [36:00] >> Yes, I know. I said if I needed to be [36:02] spanked, I'd just hold out my hand. [36:04] >> Oh. [36:05] >> You hit, you finish hitting. [36:07] >> And I'm still the same. [36:08] >> Right. But I would happily hold out my [36:10] hand. Let me put it this way, [36:12] >> Actually. Right, we envy how Teacher [36:16] Xiao Hu seems so free and authentic. [36:19] >> This kind of life has a price. [36:21] >> Ah, yes. [36:22] >> She paid that price. [36:23] >> Having to be punished. [36:25] >> Since she was little, whenever she [36:26] deserved a spanking, she’d take the [36:27] initiative to get it. So what are we [36:29] like now? Because we haven't paid that [36:31] price, after she started working and [36:33] offended people, this place wouldn't [36:35] let her do research, that place [36:36] wouldn't publish her books, that school [36:38] wouldn't grant her that degree. [36:40] Basically, you pay all the costs and [36:42] that's it. [36:42] >> It's actually a choice, it's a choice; [36:44] whether you're free or not is truly [36:46] your own decision. [36:47] >> Well, we don't really, we don't quite [36:49] dare to. [36:49] >> Why not? [36:50] >> Most people don't dare, thinking people [36:52] will laugh at them or that they'll be a [36:53] failure, look. [36:54] >> That's because you're afraid of what [36:56] others think. [36:56] >> Exactly. Don't be afraid of what others [37:00] think of you; that's their business. [37:05] >> Right? They think we're no good, they [37:08] think we're stupid, that's their [37:09] feeling. [37:11] >> Hmm. You are free to do that. Please do [37:14] so. I'll still do what I want to do, as [37:16] long as I don't hurt you, right? [37:20] >> In this memoir you're writing, although [37:22] you've only reached age 11, there's [37:24] still a long way to go. Is there a [37:28] particularly exciting chapter after you [37:30] grew up that you'd like to share, and [37:32] at roughly what age? [37:34] >> Oh. [37:35] >> Beyond 12 or [37:40] >> Well, I think at one point I spoke to [37:42] 1987, because that year I got the [37:44] doctorate people said I couldn't get. [37:48] >> Hmm. [37:49] >> Hmm. [37:50] >> But you're 50 already, you just jumped [37:52] from 11 to 50. [38:00] >> 51, 54, and then I became the female [38:03] captain of an Oxford graduate team, and [38:05] then went to Greece to row a 26- [38:07] foot-long oar—that thing still makes [38:10] me shake, it was very heavy, the ship [38:21] had 171 people rowing the same boat. [38:26] >> Oh. [38:26] >> So three levels. [38:28] >> Oh. [38:29] >> Top, middle, and bottom; it was a [38:31] warship. [38:32] >> I was going to say, that must be an [38:34] ancient Greek warship, imagining those [38:36] ships from Greek mythology. [38:40] >> I just jumped in to try it, it was very [38:42] comfortable, so I signed up; the [38:44] recruiter was from our school and told [38:46] me, "You're too short." I said, "No, [38:49] you're too tall." Because at that time [38:57] in our museum there was a uniform, [38:58] their hoplite uniform, which I could [39:00] wear, but those six-foot-tall people [39:02] they were recruiting couldn't. [39:10] >> They were all too big, these sailors [39:12] were all too big, I happened to be the [39:14] exact [39:15] >> size of an ancient Greek. [39:18] >> They were just that short. [39:20] >> So I felt very comfortable there, but [39:22] the others all felt cramped or [39:23] something. [39:26] >> I think for a 54-year-old woman, other [39:28] women that age are worrying about [39:30] retiring soon. Has my job rank been [39:33] settled? Is my partner's job rank [39:36] satisfactory? Did the kids get into the [39:39] best universities, are they bringing [39:40] honor to the family? These are the [39:42] things women in their 50s think about. [39:44] >> Oh. [39:45] >> When you were in your 50s, you were [39:47] thinking about going on a Greek ship. I [39:48] was rowing a boat in the UK. You were [39:51] teaching classes and also raising kids; [39:53] was that hard? All of these things [39:55] combined. [39:57] >> No, I made a big one. A naughty one, [40:02] >> It was shaped like a sausage, very long [40:04] , so I... [40:05] >> Yes. [40:06] >> It was about this high. So when the [40:08] child cried, I would put him in there. [40:11] >> He would just stand there and cry. And [40:12] I could watch. I said my mom would take [40:15] a stool, flip it over, put me inside, [40:17] and I wouldn't run away while she ate. [40:20] >> You just put the child in the "cage" [40:22] you made? My goodness, "inviting the [40:24] gentleman into the urn," this is an [40:26] artist mom, she can just make an urn [40:28] and stuff the kid in it. [40:29] >> And then? [40:31] >> And then he was very angry. Yeah, but [40:34] that's just how it is, being pregnant [40:36] is more fun. Being pregnant, you can [40:41] eat a lot and also climb trees, I was [40:43] very energetic. [40:45] >> Why would you still climb trees? [40:47] Pregnant people don't climb trees. [40:49] >> I climbed trees because I wanted to [40:51] make wine. [40:52] >> Ah, because... [40:56] >> You went to pick what? [40:58] >> Apples. [40:59] >> Oh. [41:01] >> The apples that fell to the ground, I'd [41:03] put them in a big bag and take them to [41:05] a place to turn them into juice. [41:08] >> Mhm. And then... [41:12] >> I put them into a whisky cask, a big [41:14] wooden barrel for making whisky, it [41:16] smelled so fragrant. [41:23] >> And in there, if you want to make very [41:25] good wine, you put the apples in, [41:27] including some branches, some little [41:29] bugs, even some meat. [41:34] >> Ah, and some meat? [41:35] >> You need ground meat. That is, minced [41:39] meat. [41:41] >> And fat, that is... [41:43] >> Fat, yes. [41:44] >> Put the fat in, and then... [41:47] >> Is it drinkable? [41:49] >> Oh, it's so delicious. Incredibly [41:51] delicious. [41:53] >> And you were pregnant then. [41:57] >> After getting pregnant, this wine isn't [41:59] ready for several months. You went [42:03] through this whole process, exactly, [42:05] just to clarify. [42:08] >> Brewing wine and climbing trees aren't [42:10] things other pregnant women usually do. [42:13] Most pregnant women wouldn't prepare [42:14] for childbirth this way. [42:18] >> So, in every aspect of your life— [42:20] whether as a student, a mother, or a [42:22] teacher—I feel like you’ve never [42:24] given up on this spiritual pursuit. [42:28] >> Worldly affairs haven't overwhelmed [42:29] that part of you. [42:31] >> No, not at all, that's true. That is [42:33] the most important thing; it is our [42:35] soul. [42:36] >> So, have you ever encountered anything [42:38] truly difficult? I'm particularly [42:40] curious because you seem so capable, as [42:42] if nothing could ever stop you. Was [42:45] there ever a hardest moment? [42:47] >> I felt extremely depressed. I really [42:50] couldn't get past it. The question [42:54] wasn't whether the Palace Museum had [42:56] fakes. [42:59] >> Hmm. [43:00] >> The question was whether there were any [43:02] authentic works and how to find them. [43:04] When I discovered that, I actually [43:06] developed a fever. [43:08] >> Hmm. [43:09] >> I couldn't get up for three days. [43:11] >> Were you anxious because there were no [43:13] authentic works? [43:15] >> Yes, the issue was that serious. [43:19] >> Because when I was writing about [43:21] paintings, there wasn't a single [43:22] authentic work from the Five Dynasties, [43:24] and very few from the Northern Song. [43:26] There is only one authentic Southern [43:28] Song painting. And works by the four [43:29] great masters of the Yuan Dynasty are [43:31] extremely rare. [43:31] >> Hmm, what about those in the Imperial [43:33] Palace? [43:33] >> There is one, "Dwelling in the Fuchun [43:35] Mountains," just that one piece. [43:37] >> Just one. [43:38] >> What about Wu Zhen? [43:39] >> You said Wu Zhen has three and a half [43:40] works. [43:41] >> Yes. [43:42] >> And Ni Zan only has one? [43:44] >> Ni Zan has only one. [43:45] >> Yes. But Ni Zan’s paintings aren't [43:47] said to be widely circulated? Well, of [43:50] course, because Ming Dynasty people [43:52] said we judge whether someone from [43:54] Jiangnan is refined or vulgar by [43:55] whether they have a Ni Zan painting in [43:57] their home. [44:00] >> So everyone started worshipping them. [44:04] >> And that's when the fakes appeared. You [44:06] know, Laozi had a brilliant saying [44:08] about this: once everyone perceives [44:10] something as beautiful, it immediately [44:12] becomes ugly. I suddenly understood [44:15] that phrase. [44:16] >> Later, a miracle happened. Wang came [44:19] over and said, "Do you want to come [44:21] over for a month to help me?" [44:23] >> Oh, our designer Wang Shu, is it? Hmm. [44:26] >> So, we ate together. Three architects. [44:29] I told them, "Since you are here, you [44:31] can see our big exhibition at the [44:33] Palace Museum called 'Southern Song.' [44:36] Incredible Southern Song ceramics are [44:38] out, and the paintings are out too. [44:40] There is one real one, do you want to [44:43] come see it?" [44:44] >> There is one that is real. [44:45] >> Yes, it appeared, a real one. He said, [44:48] "You said there’s one?" I said, "Yes. [44:51] " It’s completely different from the [44:53] others. They said, "Oh." Which one is [44:56] it? I said I wouldn't tell them, let's [44:59] see if you can find it. Uncle Wang said [45:03] I'm not going back, I'm staying in [45:05] Taiwan, so the next day we all, the [45:07] architects, ran to the Palace Museum. [45:11] They searched and searched but couldn't [45:13] find it. I said it's that [45:15] >> exhibition. They looked again and said [45:19] they couldn't find it. I said that [45:21] piece is different from the others; you [45:23] need to find one that doesn't look like [45:24] any of the others. These architects all [45:28] found things already published in books [45:29] , which were all fakes—paintings that [45:31] had been published in books. I thought, [45:34] but the photographer asked, "Is it this [45:36] one? That was it?" He found the [45:38] original. Because the photographer [45:41] hadn't been "contaminated," he didn't [45:43] know art history, he hadn't read the [45:45] books, he just looked for something [45:46] completely different from the others. [45:50] It's very obvious that those who are " [45:52] contaminated" can no longer... [45:54] >> I would feel very surprised. It's this [45:58] thing—a person's spiritual character, [46:00] the emotions you mentioned, even [46:01] preserved through these brushstrokes [46:03] for thousands of years. If it's [46:07] authentic, we, as people today, can [46:09] still feel this essence, which I find [46:11] ... [46:12] >> This is so magical. Yes, that is the [46:15] wonder of brush and ink. Did you see it [46:18] yesterday? [46:20] >> That painting by Tang Yin called "The [46:22] Scholars." [46:23] >> Hmm. Right? It satirizes those [46:26] self-proclaimed great scholars, [46:28] portraying their arrogant attitudes as [46:30] very, very ridiculous, isn't it? [46:33] Because he didn't paint them with [46:35] respect, but rather vividly depicted [46:37] this... [46:39] >> Very funny, very sarcastic, right? [46:42] >> Very satirical. [46:43] >> That's when I was reading this book of [46:44] conversations. Because at that time, [46:46] you weren't very old, you were still a [46:48] student, right? [46:50] >> Well, I was in my thirties. Hmm, [46:52] talking with Mr. Wang Jiqian. Yes. [46:55] >> The very first question you asked him [46:57] was: "We often talk about 'spirit [46:58] resonance'(qiyun shengdong), what does [47:01] 'qiyun' mean? What is 'qiyun'?" Hmm. [47:03] >> When I saw that question, I thought, " [47:05] Oh my, I probably don't know what he's [47:07] talking about either, what 'qiyun' [47:09] refers to. But how could you have the [47:10] nerve to ask, 'Hey, what is qiyun? What [47:12] does spirit resonance mean?'" [47:14] >> Actually, in these questions... [47:16] >> Teacher Xiaohu, you often rebutted Mr. [47:18] Wang in there. Mr. Wang would say it's [47:20] like this, and you'd say, "I don't [47:21] think it's like that." Mr. Wang would [47:23] say, "How can you not see even this? [47:25] Isn't that stupid?" And then you'd say, [47:27] "If you can't teach me, doesn't that [47:28] make you even more stupid?" I laughed [47:30] when I saw that. [47:31] >> Yes, so when I saw you ask about 'qiyun [47:33] ,' it was because I saw Mr. Wang [47:34] Jiqian's answer. [47:35] >> He really explained the concept of "Qi [47:37] Yun"(spirit resonance) to me clearly. [47:39] >> Mm. Because I always thought, and he [47:43] said, you might think "Qi Yun Ling Dong [47:45] " just means the brushwork is [47:46] particularly agile or fluid, but that's [47:49] not necessarily true, because some [47:50] people's brushwork is very solemn. [47:54] >> Yet it still has spirit and resonance. [47:56] >> Mm. [47:58] >> So, "Qi Yun" actually refers to their [48:00] individual traits, including their [48:02] worldview and the personalized, unique [48:04] expression of their inner emotions. [48:08] That is Qi Yun. Right. [48:10] >> To use a very simple analogy, if you [48:12] say a person is very vivid, it doesn't [48:14] necessarily mean they have to be agile [48:16] or dexterous. [48:18] >> Mm. [48:18] >> They could be a very steady, honest [48:20] person, and they can still be vivid and [48:22] resonant. [48:25] >> Right, and I have another feeling: when [48:27] you talk to someone who is truly [48:28] knowledgeable like him, they don't seem [48:30] to fear any counter-arguments you raise [48:32] or any questions we might consider [48:34] simple. Is it that the more [48:37] knowledgeable someone is, the less they [48:39] put on airs? I think the more an expert [48:41] loves their field, the more willing [48:43] they are to discuss it when you ask [48:44] them questions. [48:46] >> What makes a person put on airs? [48:49] >> Ignorance. [48:50] >> Ignorance. [48:52] >> It's just adults, that kind of "adult [48:54] disease," because they want others to [48:56] think they are someone different from [48:57] who they actually are. More beautiful, [49:01] smarter, or better than themselves in [49:03] some way? [49:05] >> There's a psychological need there. [49:07] They feel they aren't enough, so they [49:09] have to pretend to be something else. [49:12] It starts from age 12, because Mom says [49:14] , "Your hands are so dirty, how can you [49:17] go see people? What will they think of [49:20] the way you're dressed?" So parents [49:22] make you feel that what others think is [49:24] what matters. [49:25] >> Mm. [49:26] >> You could say I don't care. Therefore, [49:30] I finally understood one thing: why it [49:32] was precisely him who ultimately found [49:34] this method of authenticating paintings [49:36] . It’s because when we judge whether [49:41] a painting is genuine or valuable, we [49:43] might not seriously engage in a [49:44] dialogue with the painting itself. [49:49] >> Because we might not have the [49:50] confidence, thinking that we don't [49:51] understand it. [49:53] >> We find it easier to look at the [49:55] collectors 'seals on it, whether the [49:57] Emperor left an inscription, and these [49:59] details; but these details are external [50:01] —they belong to others, not the [50:02] painting itself. [50:04] >> The brushwork of the painting is what [50:06] represents the artist themselves. [50:08] >> And for a person like him who doesn't [50:09] care at all about what others think, [50:12] >> He strips away all those outer layers [50:13] the moment he starts, [50:14] >> Right. [50:15] >> And then he studies the brushwork [50:16] itself directly. [50:17] >> Right. [50:18] >> So he pioneered another way of making [50:20] judgments. [50:21] >> That is the most fundamental one. [50:24] >> It’s not another way, but an internal [50:26] one. [50:27] >> For most people, you know. [50:28] >> They all look at the outside. [50:30] >> They look at the appearance first, the [50:32] clothes, the education, the title, and [50:34] the reputation. Then we judge what kind [50:35] of person they are. [50:36] >> Right, how foolish, don't you see? [50:38] >> Mm. [50:39] >> I think experiencing real things and [50:40] seeing real things in childhood is [50:42] especially important. [50:43] >> It is. [50:44] >> He has real experiences, real feelings, [50:47] and luckily, he wasn't corrected or [50:49] conditioned. [50:50] >> Not corrected, right. [50:54] >> That’s because after we become too [50:56] socialized, we lose that original, keen [50:58] sense of life. Because his intuition is [51:03] so sharp and hasn't been corrupted, you [51:05] know, he can instantly dialogue with [51:07] the painter's brushwork—the person's [51:09] solemnity, sublimity, and sadness can [51:11] immediately connect with his own [51:12] feelings. You saw that. [51:15] >> We couldn't connect. [51:16] >> Did you see it at first sight? Or [51:18] >> You can also feel it. Didn't I just see [51:20] you and we hugged? Why did we hug? I [51:23] didn't even know his name. [51:25] >> I looked into his eyes and I wanted to [51:27] hug him. [51:28] >> Mm. [51:31] >> Just like that, because I felt a kind [51:33] of atmosphere. And I felt that I liked [51:36] this soul. He didn't refuse me either. [51:40] He reached out his hands, and I hugged [51:42] him. [51:44] >> I thought I had forced a hug on you. I [51:46] >> Alright, it was a mutual approach. [51:49] >> When I see him, I just feel like I like [51:51] this person. I don't know who this [51:54] person is or where they are. It doesn't [51:56] matter. It doesn't matter at all. It [51:59] doesn't matter if they studied [52:01] traditional classics. Whether you are a [52:05] cleaner, a painter, a politician, a [52:07] president, or a student. It’s just [52:11] you, and I just like your... [52:13] >> Original self. [52:15] >> Yes. From this face, from the eyes, I [52:19] feel that I like the soul within. My [52:23] soul likes this soul, and that's enough [52:25] . But I'm also interested in your [52:27] current state of life. You are living [52:30] in seclusion in the mountains now. Is [52:33] life bitter? How can a person manage to [52:35] live so simply? [52:36] >> Very simple, not necessarily bitter. [52:39] >> Mm. [52:39] >> Mm, the food is always the same, and I [52:42] also find it boring. [52:44] >> Eating the same heap of rice or [52:46] whatever day after day. But the [52:49] Nepalese people are always very happy. [52:53] He was incredibly poor, but when he [52:55] worked, he would sing, and then he [52:56] would work for a few hours. Once he had [53:00] earned enough money for the day, he [53:02] would stop. He would just say, "Thank [53:04] you, I'm going home." You ask him why [53:06] he's not doing more, and he says, "I [53:08] have enough.""I'll come back tomorrow." [53:11] Whereas Chinese people say, "How much [53:13] can I earn per hour?" and I'll keep [53:16] working until I'm exhausted. They just [53:19] want to be happy. Mm. [53:22] >> So they have a different standard. As [53:26] for my own life, you're asking if I [53:28] take medicine; for my heart, I have to [53:30] take a certain type. There are five [53:35] different ones, like diuretics, ones to [53:37] lower fat, and so on. These medicines, [53:41] I looked them up, and every single one [53:44] can be fatal. [53:46] >> Ah. [53:47] >> I checked their side effects online. [53:50] Each one is a very dangerous drug. So I [53:54] say to myself, "Time to take my poison, [53:56] " but this stuff is best not taken on [53:58] an empty stomach. So, before taking [54:02] this poison, I have to eat something, I [54:04] have to have breakfast. Sometimes I [54:07] don't have time for breakfast, so I'll [54:09] take a sip of olive oil. Or eat a large [54:11] spoonful of sesame paste, no, peanut [54:13] butter. [54:15] >> To line my stomach, then I can take [54:17] these meds. Usually what we do relates [54:21] to translation, and new ways of living. [54:26] When I go back this time, it will be [54:28] the start of ten years of work. [54:31] >> Ten years of work. [54:34] >> Calculating by our past speed, it will [54:36] likely take another ten years to finish [54:39] . You don't live in a city like [54:43] Kathmandu while in Nepal, right? [54:46] >> I live in the city now because my house [54:48] collapsed—well, it hasn't collapsed [54:50] yet, but it's about to. It's a mudslide [54:53] . [54:54] >> We get heavy rain from May to October. [54:58] >> So now, the house that used to have [55:00] land in front, no longer has land in [55:01] front. [55:03] >> There is a 70-meter drop. And we [55:09] haven't found a way to shore up the [55:11] wall with stones yet. [55:15] >> You were living in a house on the [55:17] hillside that was about to collapse. [55:18] >> Did you move somewhere where someone [55:20] takes care of you? [55:21] >> No, we—I just moved into the city. So [55:24] I feel everyone admires Teacher Hu for [55:27] being in such good shape at 90. In [55:29] reality, it's not that he has no [55:30] illnesses or pains, or that he's [55:32] different from us, but rather that [55:35] >> he pays the price that needs to be paid [55:37] . [55:37] >> These illnesses and pains, the prices [55:40] to be paid—to him, it's not a big [55:42] deal. He has no great material pursuits [55:45] , so he doesn't worry. And more [55:48] importantly, there is always a powerful [55:50] , metaphysical, spiritual pillar of [55:52] support. When a person is always [55:55] thinking about this, other things right [55:56] in front of them don't seem like much. [55:58] If I have food to eat, that’s great; [56:00] if there’s nothing to eat, that’s [56:02] no problem either. [56:03] >> Yes, that’s how it is. [56:04] >> I think painting in our country is [56:06] quite different from the West. In other [56:08] countries, they have professional [56:10] painters; those painters just paint, [56:12] and they paint their whole lives. In [56:14] our country, it’s literati painting. [56:16] Literati usually held government posts; [56:18] they were officials at the same time, [56:20] so they weren’t professional painters [56:22] . We did have professional painters, [56:25] but they were looked down upon. [56:28] >> They were considered unimportant as [56:30] painters, right? [56:31] >> Yes, that’s also the stupidity of the [56:33] literati. [56:33] >> Hmm. [56:34] >> Even the great Fan Kuan painted for a [56:37] salary, and Guo Xi also painted for a [56:39] salary. Then, in the Qing Dynasty, all [56:41] the literati painted for a salary; [56:43] people who didn't know how to paint [56:45] were all painting. [56:46] >> Hmm. [56:47] >> Your profession is to paint, but you [56:48] don't have the profession of a painter. [56:50] Am I an amateur professional painter? [56:52] Is that how you say it? [56:53] >> Yes, yes, yes—it couldn’t get any [56:56] stupider than that. Stupid literati. [57:03] Isn't it stupid? It's so stupid, as I [57:06] said. M.