陈行甲拒绝重返体制 推动民间慈善转型制度化协同

慈善不是苦行僧的游戏!韩红动了谁的蛋糕?陈行甲撕开虚伪面具!#第一人称复数 #圆桌派 #周轶君 #韩红 #慈善 #公益 — 纪实万象

纪实万象

民间慈善若陷入悲情道德绑架与对立思维必将走向衰退,唯有摒弃救世主心态、以专业透明的制度化机制协同政府,才能托举底层弱势群体并守住文明底线。

AI-assisted summary of 慈善不是苦行僧的游戏!韩红动了谁的蛋糕?陈行甲撕开虚伪面具!#第一人称复数 #圆桌派 #周轶君 #韩红 #慈善 #公益 — original source. Check the original for full context.

Source published:

Key ideas

  • 陈行甲主张摒弃传统慈善中的“救世主情结”,恒晖基金会将受助者明确定义为“服务对象”,强调现代公益不是苦行僧式的道德表演,而应依托专业与平等实现双向赋能。 (0:01)
  • 针对2020年中国青少年抑郁检出率达24.6%的心理困境,陈行甲团队倡导以“思考力、同理心、自由”为核心的公益教育理念,致力于培养兼具独立视野与社会关怀的“完整的人”。 (38:18)
  • 恒晖基金会探索去个人化与制度化运营,通过设置500元月捐上限沉淀近4万名小额月捐人,推动公众信任从个人IP转向基金会专业机制与具体项目。 (49:42)
  • 陈行甲厘清民间公益的定位:核心逻辑是主动“融入与补充政府”,充当国家治理体系的建设性伙伴,而非以救世主姿态挑拨受助群体与体制的对立。 (54:32)

Detailed notes

## Background 本视频由YouTube频道“纪实万象”于2026年10月12日发布。节目页面引用了《圆桌派》《第一人称复数》等文化访谈节目的背景介绍,围绕人性、社会与公益认知等议题,重点呈现陈行甲关于现代慈善伦理、社会治理与个人成长经历的深度对谈。

## TL;DR 陈行甲在节目中坚决摒弃将受助者置于道德低位的“救世主心态”,提出专业公益应视受助者为“服务对象”,追求双向的生命陪伴与能量滋养。结合昔日治理巴东的严苛考验与罹患重度抑郁症后涅槃重生的切身体会,他分享了母亲的爱与妻子的坚守如何成为其生命的精神锚点。面对当下青少年的心理危机与迷茫困境,他提炼出“思考力、同理心、自由”的核心成长理念,并深刻指出民间公益不搞悲情道德绑架,而应以科学透明的机制主动融入并有效补充政府治理体系,共同托举社会的文明底线。

## Atmosphere & style 整场对话真挚深沉、张弛有度,既有直面底层绝境与生死离别时令人屏息凝噎的悲怆,也有忆及校园初恋诗篇与排球场往事时的朗润笑意。陈行甲的讲述兼具历经仕途磨砺后的通透务实与理想主义者的滚烫赤诚,与主持人的敏锐追问碰撞出极具哲思的火花。聆听过程仿佛跟随讲述者经历了一场从深渊绝境到精神重生的心灵洗礼,在沉重的人间苦难中不断汲取温暖、坚韧与释怀的生命力量。

## Bulletin - [00:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=1s) 陈行甲主张摒弃传统慈善中的“救世主情结”,恒晖基金会将受助者明确定义为“服务对象”,强调现代公益不是苦行僧式的道德表演,而应依托专业与平等实现双向赋能。 - [38:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=2298s) 针对2020年中国青少年抑郁检出率达24.6%的心理困境,陈行甲团队倡导以“思考力、同理心、自由”为核心的公益教育理念,致力于培养兼具独立视野与社会关怀的“完整的人”。 - [49:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=2982s) 恒晖基金会探索去个人化与制度化运营,通过设置500元月捐上限沉淀近4万名小额月捐人,推动公众信任从个人IP转向基金会专业机制与具体项目。 - [54:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=3272s) 陈行甲厘清民间公益的定位:核心逻辑是主动“融入与补充政府”,充当国家治理体系的建设性伙伴,而非以救世主姿态挑拨受助群体与体制的对立。

## Key takeaways - [00:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=1s) 彻底废弃“受助人”与“救济”等居高临下的词汇,以“服务对象”与“服务”代之,防止前线工作者因道德优越感与感恩预期落空而陷入心理耗竭。 - [13:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=822s) 衡量社会文明的高度不在于诞生了多少富豪或科技成就,而在于其制度安全网能把最底层无告者的底线托举得多高。 - [15:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=913s) 面对身陷绝境而做出极端举动的底层家庭,专业公益应超越法律惩戒与道德指责的本能冲动,给予深层的体谅与制度化救助。 - [25:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=1505s) 重度抑郁症的生死历练如同一场“脱皮”般的涅槃,使陈行甲历经从看山是山、到看山非山、再重归看山是山的生命通透境界。 - [32:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=1968s) 爱情不仅是相伴,更是在自我怀疑中获得极高维度的“终极自我确认”,成为其经历心理坍塌时赖以生还的情感锚点。 - [36:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=2162s) 70年代一代充分享受了改革开放与时代红利,而当下年轻人面对高度成熟与内卷的生存节奏,普遍缺乏意义感与精神空间。 - [41:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=2467s) 公益教育的核心在于培养拥有“思考力、同理心与自由灵魂”的完整人格,帮助青年走出精致利己主义与情感障碍。 - [43:26](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=2606s) 热爱的本质在于精神上的自主意识,即使身处重重现实约束,也绝不主动习惯并甘于被束缚。 - [49:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=2982s) 现代慈善需跳出靠贩卖苦难与道德绑架来募资的旧模式,建立以财务透明、科学设计和独立审计为依托的制度信任体系。 - [54:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=3272s) 民间公益在中国必须扮演建设性伙伴的角色,主动沟通并深度协同政府资源,弥补体制兜底之外的深层痛点,而非争功挑刺。 - [58:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=3481s) 陈行甲明确表示不会重返体制,体制内不缺好官,但转型期的中国公益界迫切需要敢于创新、不畏失败的探路者。 - [01:02:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=3731s) 超越失去至亲的剧痛,以母亲般温暖通透的姿态活在人间,是对逝去亲人最深沉的纪念与生命的终极和解。

## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=1s) Rejecting the "Savior Complex": Service Recipients over Beneficiaries

Chen Xingjia establishes a foundational rule for his philanthropic work at the Henghui Foundation: language defines mindset. In foundation monthly reports, people receiving assistance are never labeled "beneficiaries," but rather "service recipients," and what the team provides is never termed "relief," but simply "service." Operating under the identity of a "savior" inherently places an individual on an assumed moral high ground, breeding a subtle sense of superiority—the self-congratulatory belief that *"I'm here to save you,"* *"you have nothing, I provide for you,"* or *"you are suffering, I'm here to rescue you."* Chen warns that assuming the mantle of a savior is not just ethically flawed, but psychologically exhausting; it actively depletes and drains a person's inner energy.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: The Psychological Divergence in Philanthropy accDescr: Compares the savior complex trap with the professional service model in charitable work.

subgraph SaviorTrap["The Savior Complex (Energy Draining)"] A["Moral High Ground / Superiority"] --> B["Expectation of Gratitude & Deference"] B --> C["Encountering Raw Reality / Hostility"] C --> D["Disillusionment & Emotional Breakdown"] end

subgraph ServiceModel["Professional Service (Sustainable)"] E["Service Recipient Mindset"] --> F["Equal Dignity & Mutual Accompaniment"] F --> G["Resilience Against Resentment"] G --> H["Reciprocal Energy & True Fulfillment"] end ```

To illustrate how devastating this savior complex can be to frontline workers, Chen recounts the painful story of A-Liang, a seven-year-old boy suffering from leukemia. During treatment, A-Liang's father had already abandoned the family, leaving the mother alone to cope with both the emotional burden and crushing medical debts. One day, the mother told hospital staff she was stepping out to buy medicine for the boy’s mouth ulcers; she walked away and never returned. When Henghui Foundation answered the hospital's distress call, volunteers tracked down the runaway father after an exhaustive search. Instead of exhibiting relief, concern, or remorse for his dying son, the father treated the volunteers with open cynicism, refusing to assume responsibility and demanding that the foundation pay off all outstanding hospital bills: *"Your foundation is so big, can’t you just cough up 80,000 or 100,000?"*

The confrontation completely broke the young frontline team member. In a recorded exchange, the volunteer cried out in anguish: *"I can't understand it, we are all... human beings!"* When he called Chen from the hospital stairwell, he was speaking incoherently, utterly traumatized by the lack of human decency. Chen immediately pulled him from the case, stepped in to handle the situation personally, and brought in professional psychological counseling. Yet Chen emphasizes that counseling alone is not what heals volunteers; they heal only when they deconstruct why they felt so deeply injured. The agony arose because the volunteer had subconsciously placed himself in the role of a savior, harboring an implicit expectation of gratitude or, at the very least, basic acknowledgment. When met instead with crass entitlement, the savior's moral framework inevitably collapses.

- **Terminology shift**: Replacing "beneficiaries" and "relief" with "service recipients" and "service" to eradicate hierarchical moral superiority. - **The Case of A-Liang**: A 7-year-old leukemia patient deserted first by his father, then by his mother on the pretext of buying mouth ulcer ointment. - **The Father's Demand**: Refused responsibility, demanding the foundation cover 80,000 to 100,000 yuan in back hospital expenses.

---

[03:36](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=216s) Lessons from Badong: Weathering Online Hostility and Disillusionment

Chen Xingjia explains that his immunity to this emotional drain stems from his prior trial by fire as the County Party Secretary of Badong. When he first took office, he discovered that public trust in local governance had already been thoroughly demolished. Regardless of how earnestly he labored or how positive his initiatives were, his efforts were met online by an unrelenting torrent of public abuse, suspicion, and cold indifference. In the beginning, he struggled with immense confusion and internal turmoil, feeling deeply misunderstood while giving his all for the community.

Over time, Chen worked through this mental hurdle. In his eventual farewell address upon leaving Badong, he made a point of publicly thanking the very netizens—singling out pseudonyms like "Chongzi" (虫子) and "Xiao Zhi" (小智)—who had spent years relentlessly attacking and criticizing him online. He recognized that these critics were simply ordinary people voicing deep-seated grievances. By the end of his tenure, the online hostility had almost completely evaporated; the public had watched him walk directly among them for years and recognized that his commitment was not a political performance.

Having survived that crucible, Chen had completed his psychological armor before ever entering the philanthropic arena. He understood from day one that genuine public service cannot be an exercise in moral grandstanding or an emotional fix for one's own ego. He expresses sharp contempt for the common, performative model of charity: commodifying the agony of the poor to tug at the heartstrings of the wealthy, taking money from affluent donors to settle hospital bills, posing for staged photographs with impoverished recipients, and calling it a day. In Chen’s view, that is deeply hypocritical—it reduces vulnerable people to props merely used to help the wealthy polish their own moral egos.

- **Badong netizen critics**: Commentators like "Chongzi" and "Xiao Zhi" persistently attacked Chen during his early term, yet received his sincere gratitude in his farewell address. - **Shift in public sentiment**: Hostility only subsided toward the end of his tenure, after the community observed consistent, unpretentious action on the ground. - **Critique of performative charity**: Exploiting tragic narratives of the poor solely to allow affluent benefactors to burnish their moral self-image.

---

[05:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=337s) Mutual Energy and True Charity: Beyond the Drain of Negativity

Responding to Chen’s resilience, host Zhou Yijun wonders aloud whether people like him are "made of some special material," drawing a parallel to an interview she conducted with 90-year-old primatologist Jane Goodall. Despite her advanced age and the availability of modern livestreaming technology, Goodall still spends over 300 days a year traveling across the globe to give in-person lectures. When asked why she undertakes such grueling physical travel, Goodall replied: *"I need to go to the venues to also feel the energy that other people give me."* Zhou suggests that genuine public welfare functions on this exact principle: giving and receiving are not a one-way transaction from the elevated to the lowly, but a unified, reciprocal circulation of human energy.

Chen enthusiastically embraces this framing, defining the deeper essence of charity through the lens of human fragility. In the span of a lifetime, anyone can encounter devastating misfortune. Some individuals are fortunate enough to experience light setbacks that pass quickly; others are struck by catastrophes so massive that neither they nor their families can endure alone. Professional charity workers do not arrive as saviors, but as companions who walk alongside these families through the darkest, most desolate stretches of their lives. When a worker looks beyond a patient's withered, disease-ravaged face and recognizes the sacred dignity of life, an authentic bond is formed. In that shared presence, the helper realizes an essential truth: *"While you have blessed them, you are even more deeply blessed by them."* Only when this level of understanding is achieved does the emotional exhaustion vanish.

To demonstrate the consequences of failing to reach this mindset, Chen shares the story of an exceptional young team member who worked alongside him for more than three years before suddenly resigning. Chen did not pressure him to stay and even helped him secure his next job. The departure stemmed from an admission the young man had made in confidence to another colleague: after getting married, he and his wife had struggled for years to conceive, and he had come to believe that spending so much time in pediatric cancer wards around terminally ill children had infected him with an unfortunate, negative "aura." Chen realized immediately that despite outward competence and surface-level professional dedication, the young man subconsciously viewed the suffering of others as a contaminating force. Carrying that latent fear, any continued involvement would only result in severe internal depletion.

The discussion closes as Zhou Yijun poses a provocative question: If an individual feels zero negative drain when immersed in profound human tragedy, is there perhaps some internal void or unresolved need inside them that drives them to seek out that intense energy in the first place?

- **Jane Goodall's philosophy**: Traveling 300+ days annually at age 90 to physically exchange living energy with audiences rather than communicating remotely. - **The departure of a core teammate**: A dedicated employee left the foundation after attributing his marital infertility to a negative "aura" acquired inside children's cancer wards. - **The paradox of accompaniment**: Charity sustains itself only when workers realize that walking alongside people in their darkest hours leaves the caregiver more blessed by the recipient than vice versa.

[10:39](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=639s) The Driving Force of a "Sense of Mission"

The conversation opens with a probing philosophical question about the internal engine that drives people to undertake demanding paths: does a person keep pushing forward because of an abundance of innate energy, or is it paradoxically because they feel a deep inner lack—an emptiness they are restlessly searching to fill? The host observes that human beings rarely embark on relentless crusades simply because they possess limitless vitality. More often, they are searching for an elusive force to propel them forward, an urge to reach for something beyond themselves.

Chen Xingjia connects this searching to the term "sense of mission" (使命感), offering his own distinct interpretation. He explains that one does not simply stumble upon a mission and suddenly feel driven; rather, the "sense of mission" must exist first, long before the concrete mission is ever identified. It manifests as a persistent, indefinable sensation—an inner conviction that there is a purpose waiting to be served, even if one cannot yet name the specific cause or object to which it attaches. Eventually, that abstract urgency finds its anchor in real-world duty. This discussion of purpose segues back into the raw, tragic human reality that anchored his charitable work: the story of a young patient named A-Liang and his mother.

[11:35](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=695s) A Mother's Desperate Fight and the Meaning of Forgiveness

The panel revisits the initial judgment surrounding A-Liang's mother, who had seemingly vanished from the hospital and left her critically ill child behind. On the surface, the act appeared callous, heartless, and even criminal—a clear-cut case of child abandonment that outraged onlookers. Yet the narrative underwent a profound, heartbreaking reversal once Chen and his team intervened. After an agonizing week of absence, A-Liang's mother reappeared at the hospital. She was visibly withered and haggard, her hollow face bearing the weight of immense, unspoken suffering and suffocating guilt. Despite the frantic medical efforts of the volunteers and doctors, A-Liang could not be saved and eventually passed away.

In the aftermath, a female volunteer broke down in uncontrollable sobs, having uncovered the truth of the mother's week-long disappearance. The mother had not abandoned her son out of malice; she had run out of every possible avenue to borrow money for his medical care. Driven into absolute desperation, she had turned to sex work as a last-ditch attempt to raise the funds needed to keep her child alive. In his memoir, Chen Xingjia wrote forcefully that her actions were not shameful: this was an impoverished mother waging a desperate, solitary war against fate for her child's survival, and she deserved compassion rather than moral condemnation. Reflecting on this in the studio, Chen is visibly moved, his voice breaking:

> "How should I put it, she is truly a great mother... It’s not that we have fully forgiven them. I feel it is she who has forgiven us. She has forgiven society."

The studio falls into a heavy, emotional silence as someone asks for tissues to wipe away tears, acknowledging the unbearable tragedy of a mother pushed to the absolute edge of human dignity.

[13:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=822s) The True Bottom Line of Civilization

Moving from A-Liang's tragedy to the systemic purpose of philanthropy, Chen explains why modern charity must evolve far beyond episodic disaster relief. The true purpose of charitable organizations is to construct a resilient social safety net capable of catching those who slip into life's deepest, most catastrophic abysses. While individuals experiencing such extreme suffering may appear to be a small minority among the vast general population, Chen argues that their treatment is the ultimate moral barometer of any culture:

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: The Civilization Bottom Line Framework accDescr: A diagram contrasting conventional metrics of civilization with Chen Xingjia's bottom-line social support net. subgraph Conventional["Conventional Metrics"] A["Wealth of the Elite"] B["Technological Innovation"] end subgraph TrueStandard["The True Measure of Civilization"] C["Height of the Societal Bottom Line"] D["Institutional Social Safety Net"] E["Protection for the Voiceless & Desperate"] end Conventional -.->|"Incomplete without"| TrueStandard C --> D D --> E ```

Chen asserts that the civilizational height of a society cannot be judged merely by how opulent its billionaires are or how cutting-edge its technological inventions seem. Instead, the true measure of civilization is "how high its bottom line really is"—how humanely and thoroughly it protects those trapped in acute distress. The tragedy of the most marginalized is that they often lack the voice, education, or social capital even to articulate their pain or ask for help. When people are entirely voiceless, their suffering remains invisible until they are driven to catastrophic choices like abandoning a child on a hospital bed.

[15:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=913s) Empathy Over Retribution: Understanding Absolute Desperation

When asked whether he ever felt anger or resentment toward parents who abandon their children in hospital wards, Chen admits that his very first instinct upon encountering such a case was fury. Younger volunteers and staff members initially reacted with righteous indignation, declaring the act a crime and demanding that lawyers be brought in to notify the police. However, Chen was the first to intervene and stop them from pursuing punitive action. He realized that no parent takes such a step unless pushed to the absolute limits of human endurance:

- Rather than dragging parents back through legal coercion, Chen believed that parents would return on their own accord, drawn back by the bond of their suffering children. - When A-Liang's mother returned days later, her face was completely drained of color and etched with exhaustion, proving she had not slept a wink during her absence. - Recognizing her sheer, unadulterated desperation dissolved any desire for retribution; Chen insisted that the only humane response was to find such parents, listen to their grief, and offer support rather than judgment.

[16:41](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=1001s) Breaking Down Stigma: The Onset of Severe Depression

The discussion pivots toward Chen's personal life and psychology. Friends from his university days remembered him as a bright, sunny, and endlessly optimistic young man. Yet across different crossroads of his life, people often viewed him as somewhat unconventional—jokingly comparing him to a pair of old-style police trousers with an extra non-standard stripe running down the side, always standing slightly apart from bureaucratic conformity. But when asked to identify the single most transformative turning point of his existence, Chen states without hesitation that it was his battle with severe clinical depression.

Chen describes this episode as dividing his life into two completely separate existences: the person he was before the illness, and the person reborn after recovery. Drawing on Buddhist terminology, he likens his recovery to "Nirvana," having literally descended into hell and witnessed what it looks like from the inside. Following his breakdown, he was admitted to a psychiatric facility. He openly critiques the deep social stigma that surrounds mental illness, noting how people nervously avoid the term "psychiatric hospital" and soften it to "Mental Health Center" to feel comfortable. A panelist references the poignant metaphor from Chen's book describing moderate depression: the feeling of being trapped inside a frosted glass house—translucent enough to see outside, yet completely sealed, with the walls constantly contracting and suffocating the occupant.

[18:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=1103s) The Frosted Glass Coffin and the Mother's Voice

Chen elaborates on the visceral horror of that period. For months, severe insomnia stripped him of rest. Sleeping pills steadily lost their efficacy until they ceased working altogether, leaving him trapped in agonizing nightly battles with exhaustion. One morning around 5:00 or 6:00 AM, just as the sky began to pale with dawn, he finally drifted into a state of sleep and entered a haunting dream:

- He found himself trapped inside a tiny enclosure made entirely of frosted glass on all four sides, measuring barely one square meter. - The space was so tight he could not even turn his body around, an experience he later recognized as the exact sensory equivalent of being sealed inside a coffin. - Suddenly, amidst the oppressive claustrophobia, he heard light, gentle footsteps outside, followed by a soft knock on the invisible wall. - A voice called out his childhood nickname: *"Jia'er, come out. Jia'er, be a good boy and come out"* ("甲儿,出来。甲儿,乖乖地出来"). It was the unmistakable voice of his deceased mother.

Chen woke up instantly, drenched in cold sweat, his body overheated and nearly paralyzed with terror. Calming his racing pulse, he reached for his phone on the nightstand and called his wife, who was living 500 kilometers away. For months, wanting to shield his family from worry, he had kept his deteriorating condition completely hidden. In that moment of awakening from the glass coffin, he finally broke his silence and made a desperate call for help, admitting aloud: "I am sick. I am really sick."

[20:16](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=1216s) The Void of Grief and the Warning Signs of Collapse

Chen reflects on the underlying emotional fracture that paved the way for his mental breakdown: the immense, irreparable void left behind by his mother's death. Although the overwhelming professional pressures and responsibilities of his career acted as immediate triggers, the unhealed grief of losing his mother remained a permanent shadow over his psyche. Yet even in his darkest moments, when he felt plunged into the deepest abyss, he could still feel her presence and hear her footsteps walking toward him.

When he called his wife to confess how sick he was, her response was immediate and unconditional: *"Come back immediately... Don't be afraid, just come back."* She told him to drop every responsibility on the spot. Chen boarded a plane and flew home. Stepping out to see his wife waiting downstairs with a joyful face, he felt an initial surge of relief, believing that being home would cure him. But his neurological and emotional collapse ran far deeper than fatigue.

His wife recognized the terrifying gravity of his condition through a single, alarming incident: their son was preparing for the demanding third year of middle school (senior high entrance exams), and she had to step out briefly, asking Chen to look after him at home. When she returned, she found Chen and his son sitting together in utter, frozen silence. Chen had been completely incapable of uttering a single word to his own child. That complete shutdown of basic emotional communication was the undeniable proof that he had sunk into severe clinical depression.

[21:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=1310s) The Depths of Depression, a Dismissive Doctor, and a Lifeline Phone Call

The true severity of Chen Xingjia's depression became terrifyingly undeniable through his relationship with his son. His son was his entire world, yet he suddenly realized they could sit together in the exact same room and have absolutely nothing to say to one another. Seeing him reduced to an empty shell, his wife recognized the crisis and urged him to seek medical help immediately. However, his initial hospital consultation proved disastrous. Within less than three minutes of listening, the doctor casually brushed him off with a detached, dismissive glance, saying, "Alright, alright, I've seen many cases like yours. Let me write a note; just go ahead and get admitted to the hospital, go handle the admission procedures." That cold, indifferent gaze shattered what little resolve Chen had left. Completely devastated, he knew instinctively that this doctor would never be able to heal him.

Refusing to complete the admission paperwork, Chen stood in the hospital hallway and called his wife in tears, confessing that the doctor's demeanor had broken him and that he wanted to come home. His wife did not hesitate; she had already researched alternatives before he even left. She instructed him firmly not to turn back, but to travel through the night without stopping to the PLA Mental Health Center in Jiangsu. Drained and hollow, Chen felt utterly dissociated during the journey, describing his spirit as detached and floating outside his physical body.

Upon finally arriving and getting admitted at the Jiangsu facility, Chen phoned his wife to let her know he had settled in. Her reaction on the other end of the line was brimming with pure, unadulterated joy: "Oh, that's great, that's wonderful! I'm walking toward the river now. I just bought the things I needed, and I'm going to burn offerings for Grandma by the river, then I'll be there first thing tomorrow morning." Hearing her speak with such optimism and warmth about burning paper offerings for his late mother moved him to uncontrollable tears the moment he hung up. That call served as his ultimate spiritual anchor, pulling him back from the abyss just as he felt himself slipping away.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Chen Xingjia Crisis and Intervention Flow accDescr: Diagram illustrating the emotional breakdown and the wife's decisive intervention leading to admission. subgraph Crisis["Descent into Crisis"] A["Emotional Numbness<br/>(Cannot speak to son)"] --> B["First Hospital Visit"] B --> C["Cold, Dismissive Doctor<br/>(<3 min consultation)"] C --> D["Total Psychological Collapse<br/>in Hospital Hallway"] end

subgraph Intervention["Spiritual Anchor"] D --> E["Call to Wife"] E --> F["Wife Directs Overnight Journey<br/>to Jiangsu PLA Center"] F --> G["Safe Arrival & Check-in"] G --> H["Wife's Grounding Joy<br/>(River offerings & reassurance)"] end ```

[25:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=1505s) Shedding a Layer of Skin: Transforming Through Trauma and Grief

Acknowledging that he was extraordinarily fortunate to have survived that dark period, Chen identifies the death of his mother and his subsequent battle with severe depression as the absolute turning points of his life. Emerging from that debilitating illness felt like a total metamorphosis—a painful, profound process of "shedding a layer of skin" (*脱了一层皮*). When asked to describe who he was before versus after this transformation, he reflects on the classic philosophical paradox of perception.

Rather than viewing himself as an entirely different person, he explains that he returned to simplicity through trial. In his youth, he saw mountains as mountains and water as water. As he encountered trauma, disillusionment, and agony, he entered the disorienting phase where mountains were no longer mountains and water was no longer water. Ultimately, having stared into the void and survived, he arrived back at a place of clarity where mountains are once again mountains, and water is once again water—embodying the truth that what did not kill him left him profoundly resilient.

[26:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=1587s) The Mountain Boy and the City Girl: Overcoming Deep-Seated Inferiority

Shifting to a lighter memory, the conversation turns to the romance between Chen and his wife during their days at Hubei University. Chen had fallen for her during their freshman year, but he harbored a crushing sense of inadequacy that kept him from confessing his feelings for years. Coming from an impoverished, remote mountain village, he felt an insurmountable class divide between them. To him, she was an unattainable figure; even watching her walk away from behind filled him with longing and envy.

This self-doubt was reinforced by his physical and socioeconomic background: - **Physical growth and malnutrition:** In junior high, Chen stood at just 1.56 meters (approx. 5'1"). During his first year of high school, a sudden growth spurt brought him to 1.74 meters (he is 1.75 meters today). - **Extreme thinness:** Arriving at university, he weighed a mere 114 jin (approx. 57 kg / 125 lbs), carrying visible physical markers of rural childhood hunger and thin arms, compared to his healthy adult weight of 140 jin (70 kg). - **Contrasting backgrounds:** It took Chen two days and two nights of arduous travel just to leave his mountain home and reach the university city for the first time. By contrast, she was a poised city native from an educated, cultured family, boasting top academic grades and serving as a student leader.

Subconsciously, Chen felt completely unworthy of someone so accomplished, believing that even admitting his feelings to himself was an overstep. When asked how one ever overcomes such deep-seated inferiority, the answer boiled down to the transformative power of love—and the unexpected grace of her reaching out first.

[28:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=1699s) A Handwritten Poem, a Night Without Sleep, and the Library Letter

The breakthrough arrived during their junior year in an otherwise unremarkable college classroom. Typically, conscientious female students claimed the front rows while the male students slacked off in the back. Because the class that day was particularly dry, she arrived right at the final bell and slipped into an open seat in the back directly beside Chen. When the lecture ended, she casually passed him a slip of paper containing a poem she had transcribed from a popular campus magazine like *Readers* (*读者*) or *Youth Digest* (*青年文摘*), remarking offhandedly that the lecture was boring and the verse was worth reading.

Having practiced calligraphy since age six, she was certified by the China Calligraphers Association, and her penmanship was striking and professional. The poem centered on themes of fated encounters and unspoken, earth-shaking yearning. Though she handed it over casually and walked away, the gesture threw Chen into an emotional whirlwind. He lay awake the entire night, unable to sleep, reading and re-reading the poem dozens of times until morning.

The following day, Chen skipped class entirely to camp out in a quiet corner of the university library, determined to craft his very first love letter. Lacking modern aids like generative AI, he poured every ounce of his literary ability into writing a profound, heartfelt commentary on the poem and lavishly praising her calligraphy. Discontented with his initial draft, he meticulously recopied the text over and over to ensure flawless handwriting. Afterward, he staged an "accidental" encounter in the hallway, nonchalantly handing her the letter alongside a book, saying, "You wrote that poem so well yesterday. Look, I wrote a little reflection on it." She accepted it calmly, cementing the first bridge across the divide between them.

[31:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=1885s) Spikes on the Volleyball Court and the 20th Anniversary Album

That handwritten reply gradually dissolved the distance between them, leading to everyday conversations while fetching hot water, walking along campus paths, or eating meals. Chen’s confidence was further buoyed by his athletic prowess; he was an ace spiker for both the mathematics department and the university volleyball team. During matches, he would spot her among the crowd on the sidelines, jumping and enthusiastically applauding whenever he landed a powerful spike, signaling that his feelings were fully reciprocated.

This youthful exchange remained sacred to Chen decades later. For their 20th wedding anniversary, he designed a commemorative photo album containing exactly 20 photographs—one for each year of their marriage arranged in reverse chronological order, opening with the present day and ending on their wedding portrait. On the back cover of the album, he printed a high-resolution photograph of the very poem note she had slipped him in that boring university classroom two decades earlier. When she received the gift, she was overwhelmed with joy, calling him that evening with an excitement so intense it felt like a pot of boiling water bubbling over.

[32:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=1968s) 初恋到相守:爱情中的确认感与妻子的精神支柱作用

陈行甲回忆起自己与妻子吴乙中之间的一段甜蜜往事。他曾问妻子是否注意到了自己作品结尾关于“山风”的设计,妻子回答注意到了,并询问是否有特殊含义。陈行甲动情地表示,他其实是想把这背后的故事告诉儿子,再由儿子讲给未来的孙辈听——当年妻子送给他的那句诗,犹如“铁壁合如山”。然而妻子当时的反应却十分风趣甚至有点“煞风景”,笑着反驳道:“你想多了!当年那节课太无聊了,我就是随手抄了一首诗;看你坐我旁边,平时又爱写诗、混迹在校园文学社,我就顺手递给你分享一下,纯粹是你自己自作多情。”陈行甲笑着感叹,即便如此,那种幸福感也是无与伦比的,甚至被现场调侃这是最高段位的“凡尔赛”。

面对现代大学生普遍不愿恋爱、害怕试错成本过高(“如果不确定结果,何必投入精力”)的现象,陈行甲深表理解。他认为,获得心爱之人的爱,本质上是一种极高维度的“自我确认”。许多人在失恋时之所以痛不欲生甚至走向极端,正是因为自己所珍视和认可的对象否定了自己,导致整个自我确认体系瞬间坍塌。而他当年最幸运的事情,就是获得了这种终极确认——自己深爱的人恰好也深爱着自己。两人从初恋一路相伴走到今天,是他人生中最大的幸福。当被问及妻子是否也是他的精神支柱时,陈行甲深思后坦言,在自己精神陷入极度崩溃、遭遇种种危难的关键时刻,妻子的一个电话、一句话往往就是救命的良药;自从母亲离世后,妻子吴乙中便接过了这一角色,生命中的这两位女性构成了他最坚实的依靠。

---

[36:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=2162s) 时代的红利与青年心理危机:为什么物质丰富却更不快乐?

话题转到当代青少年的心理健康状况。主持人提到陈行甲书中所引用的触目惊心的数据:2020年中国青少年的抑郁检出率达到24.6%(相当于每四个孩子中就有一个抑郁),而在小学阶段这一比例也达到了约10%。陈行甲这一代人幼年时经历过极为艰苦贫困的物质匮乏,却靠着坚韧克服了自卑并一路奋斗;而如今的孩子物质条件远胜从前,为何反而普遍陷入不快乐?

陈行甲感慨,每一代人有每一代人的艰难,但他由衷觉得当下的年轻人比他们那一代要艰难得多。虽然70年代出生的人起点很低,但恰恰是最完整、最彻底享受了时代红利的一代: - **生于1970年**:刚上小学时适逢文革结束,进入中学即迎来了诗意盎然、充满朝气的80年代; - **1988年上大学,1992年初毕业**:正好赶上邓小平南方谈话,全国各大报纸头版都在宣扬“东方风来满面春”,改革开放全面提速; - **加入WTO与深化改革**:尽管当时的乡村与城市基建较为落后,但整个社会生机勃勃、机会遍地,充满了正在腾飞的“发展中”红利与人间奇迹。

陈行甲指出,那一阶段的社会允许浪漫,而浪漫的前提是节奏能够慢下来。反观当下,社会已经迈入“发达”与高度成熟的阶段,年轻人面临的生存和竞争节奏完全被加速压缩。

---

[38:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=2298s) “迷茫的一代”与儿子的“完整的人”:九字公益教育理念

这种普遍的不快乐与无方向感不仅存在于中国,在全世界范围内都极为普遍。学者和大学校长常用“迷茫的一代”(Lost Generation)来形容当代青年——即便是常春藤盟校里家境优渥、智商极高的精英学子,也往往陷入同样的困局:他们极其聪明,能够轻松解决眼前抛给他们的具体技术问题,却茫然不知自己为何要解决这些问题,彻底丧失了人生的长期方向和内驱力。

谈及参照物,陈行甲提到了自己出生于1996年底的儿子。尽管儿子目前还在读博、尚未正式工作,陈行甲也从不奢求他未来在事业上取得多大的世俗成功或名利,但他依然为儿子感到无比自豪,因为儿子是一个**“完整的人”**。他解释道,儿子虽然也有诸多缺点,但价值观极其健全。在他们共同发起的公益教育项目(包括阅读、带孩子们看山看海)中,核心的教育理念框架正是由儿子提炼出的九个字:**“思考力、同理心、自由”**(或“有思考的能力,有同理心,有自由的灵魂”)。陈行甲认为,当代年轻人体会到的焦虑、抑郁与情绪障碍,本质上正是这几个核心维度的缺失。

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 完整的人核心教育理念 accDescr: 展示陈行甲儿子提出的九字核心素养及其对抗迷茫与抑郁的内在逻辑

subgraph Core["完整的人之核心素养"] A["思考力 (思考的能力)<br/>拥有看世界的眼睛"] B["同理心<br/>超越自我,看见弱者"] C["自由 (自由的灵魂)<br/>内驱力与独立人格"] end

subgraph Problem["当代青年的心理困境"] D["坐井观天 / 被舆论绑架"] E["极度内卷 / 仅关注自身功名利禄"] F["迷茫失焦 / 抑郁与心理障碍高发"] end

A -.->|"破解"| D B -.->|"破解"| E C -.->|"破解"| F ```

---

[41:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=2467s) 思考力与同理心:打破内卷与看见他人

陈行甲在节目中详细阐释了儿子提炼的教育哲学的深层含义:

* **思考的能力**:核心是拥有“一双能看世界的眼睛”和宽广的视野。这种要求并不苛刻,不需要非得走出国门,而是拒绝坐井观天、自怨自艾,拥有最基本的辨别力,不被那些“家属全在国外、自己在国内赚爱国流量钱”的伪善之流所煽动和忽悠。 * **同理心**:这在当下尤为稀缺而重要。在个人的成绩、升学、买房、赚钱、提拔、做生意之外,内心深处能否始终保留一份对社会弱势群体的关怀。无论一个人自身处境如何,社会上永远有比自己更弱小的人。同理心不是高调的口号,而是**“看见他人”**的感知力。

陈行甲强调,践行关怀与公益并不意味着一定要辞职跑到深山支教或是去癌症病房当义工,这本身就是孩子人格成长中必不可少的心灵维度。而一个人要能够“看见他人”,前提是其内心必须先体验过被爱滋养的温暖。这契合了现代西方心理学的基石——正如弗洛伊德所揭示的,**“爱与工作是治愈一切的良药”**(Love and work are the cures for everything)。唯有在充满爱的环境中成长,拥有爱人的能力,个体才能摆脱孤独与抑郁的深渊,建立起健全的精神世界。

[43:26](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=2606s) 自由的真正含义与贵州女孩的眼泪

当被问及何为“热爱自由”时,陈行甲认为“自由”是一个极其美好、理应被大声呼喊出来的词汇。热爱自由的本质在于绝不甘于被动受限,拒绝一切被动的束缚,明确意识到“我是我自己的”。他分享了一个发生在公益夏令营中的真实故事:2018与2019年,他曾带领贵州山区的孩子前往深圳看大海;到了2020年因特殊情况孩子们无法远行,他便转变思路,带着科学家、教授、音乐家、画家和志愿者深入大山,把“大海的奇迹”打包送进山村。

在活动中,一个刚参加完下午开营仪式的小女孩,到了晚间眼里却失去了光芒。她怯生生地走向陈行甲说:“陈老师,我明天必须得回去了。”细问之下得知,女孩的父亲特地赶来要带她走——父母都在镇上打工做饭,家中爷爷身体不好,还有一个九岁的弟弟需要人照顾和做饭。陈行甲看着她,只问了一句:“你想留下吗?”女孩一言不发,眼泪大颗大颗地滚落,只是拼命地点头。陈行甲安抚她说“交给我”,随后找到前来探望的当地副县长,将孩子的姓名、乡镇、家庭背景及父亲的名字托付给对方,请副县长出面协调说服父亲,最终顺利让女孩留下来完成了活动。

陈行甲由此剖析道,这个女孩展现出的正是对自由的渴望与智慧: - 她并未当面顶撞父亲,在当时的教养与处境下,她看似只能被动服从; - 但她没有在父亲催促时直接收拾行李离开,而是悄悄等到活动环节结束,敏锐地私下寻找陈行甲求助,因为她本能地感知到只有眼前的陈老师能帮她打破困境; - 每个人在成长过程中都会遭遇数不清的外部约束与羁绊,但绝不能去“热爱”这些束缚,更不能习惯性地甘于被困住。

---

[47:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=2825s) 点燃内心的火焰:教育是唤醒而非说教

谈及对孩子的引导,周轶君感慨这种追求自由的敏锐往往需要极高的觉察力,而陈行甲认为每个孩子天生都潜藏着这种本能,关键在于教育者如何将其“引渡”并“点燃”。在新时代背景下,公益性质的教育早已不需要在讲台上重复照本宣科的算术公式或死记硬背,那些体制内教学就能完成的内容并非公益教育的核心使命;真正的教育,是帮孩子找到深藏内心的火种,悉心护住它,让它慢慢升温,直至烈火熊熊。

陈行甲引用了席慕蓉的诗句:“就让我们这样走下去,在这条布满风沙的路上,我们要护住心中那团燃烧的希望。”他观察到当下的年轻一代常陷入精神迷茫,但他想告诉所有年轻人:自己这位年过半百的“陈老师”,心中的火焰从未熄灭,如今依然在炽热地燃烧。面对陈行甲饱满的精神状态,周轶君由衷赞叹他仿佛是那个“被选中的人”——深知民间疾苦与大众所需,又拥有丰富的体制内履职背景,极具人情练达与行政沟通能力;无论是孝道、对家庭与工作的忠诚,还是对公共事务的忘我奉献,都完美契合了传统美德,这也是包括外卖骑手等普通劳动者在内的庞大受众愿意无条件信任他的基石。

---

[49:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=2982s) 从个人崇拜转向制度信任:现代公益的底层逻辑

在谈到公众的信任时,陈行甲清醒地指出,一个健康理想的公益生态绝不能仅仅依附于对某个具体个人的崇拜,而必须建立在对组织结构与运行机制的信赖之上。虽然后台数据显示许多捐赠人最初都是冲着“陈老师”这个个人IP而来,但他始终致力于完成一场转型——将公众对个人的崇拜逐步引导为对基金会专业度及公益事业本身的认同。

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 公益理念与机制对比 accDescr: 对比传统道德绑架式慈善与现代专业化公益在路径与效果上的差异

subgraph Emotion["传统感动式慈善"] E1["宣扬苦难叙事"] --> E2["道德绑架与悲情煽动"] E2 --> E3["零星救急 / 难以持续"] end

subgraph System["陈行甲现代专业公益"] S1["科学顶层设计"] --> S2["标准化管理与精准执行"] S2 --> S3["财务透明与独立三方评估"] S3 --> S4["协同体制 / 提升全社会整体效能"] end ```

陈行甲明确提出,现代慈善绝对不是苦行僧式的道德表演,更不能靠展示苦难去绑架社会同情心。专业公益从业者的使命是通过科学的设计、精准的落地、规范的管理、公开透明的账目以及独立的第三方审计评估,切实提升社会的整体运转效率;单纯靠冲动式的救急或许能救一两个人,却永远无法解决系统性的社会痛点。

令他欣慰的是,这一机制改革已初见成效: - **小额月捐汇聚力量**:基金会积累了近4万名月捐人,每人每月捐赠10元至20元不等,系统设置了严格的500元月捐上限,即使亿万富翁也不能多捐;这一设计的核心不在于快速圈钱,而在于汇聚志同道合、同行致远的广泛人群。 - **用户标签的去个人化**:在后台大数据的月度反馈词云中,“陈老师”这一关键词已不再总是独占榜首,有时甚至落出前九名; - **项目属性深入人心**:伴随针对英雄烈士子女的“传火宝贝”等项目深入推进,“传火”、“新火”、“英雄”等与项目本质相关的词汇显著攀升,展现出中国公益事业走向成熟的理性曙光。

---

[53:20](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=3200s) 理想主义的现实智慧:与体制协同发力

周轶君指出,大众心理往往更偏爱听感人肺腑的故事、寻求情绪共鸣,而非冷冰冰的社会学理论,要在这种人性本能与专业逻辑之间取得平衡极度考验智慧。投身公益不仅需要一颗赤子之心,更要在现实的复杂灰色地带中找到破局的发力点。陈行甲之所以能把公益做扎实,正是因为他从不盲目铺摊子,而是精准选择突破口,并懂得在关键时刻调动行政资源。

对此,陈行甲坦诚地给出了自己的准则:他所操盘的所有公益项目,无一例外全都选择与地方政府紧密合作。这一深刻的方法论正是源于他过往在体制内积累的实战经验——在中国的社会现实下,公益组织只有依托并协同政府体系,才能跨越阻碍,真正撬动最广泛的资源,将善意制度化、长效化地落地生根。

[54:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=3272s) 公益与政府的协同:做补充者而非对抗者

陈行甲明确指出,他在中国开展所有公益项目的底层逻辑,绝不是要与政府争功抢镜,更不是专门跑到政府照顾不到的死角去显摆自己的存在,而是主动选择“融入与补充政府”。进入一个地区开展工作,最低的底线要求是主动汇报、沟通报备并获得当地政府的许可;而他主导的项目都会跨过这道底线,追求更高层面的合作——争取政府的深度信任与协同配合,并且每一个项目都扎实做到了这一点。

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 公益行动的底层逻辑 accDescr: 对比陈行甲的融入补充模式与部分理想主义者的对抗挑拨模式

subgraph Constructive["陈行甲模式:建设性伙伴"] A["底层逻辑:融入与补充"] --> B["合规底线:汇报并获批"] B --> C["高阶目标:赢得深度信任"] C --> D["协同成效:赋能国家治理体系"] end

subgraph Adversarial["走下坡路的误区:对抗挑拨"] E["出发点:凸显个人存在感"] --> F["归因偏差:将苦难全归咎于政府"] F --> G["言语挑拨:‘政府不管你,我管’"] G --> H["破坏互信:添乱而非解决问题"] end ```

针对“这套逻辑是否源自体制内官员经历”的追问,陈行甲认为曾经的从政经历给予他的并非“因为当过官所以必须这么做”的执念,而是让他深知“本来就应该这样做”。在中国社会,政府如同提供基础公共服务的“大家长”,是兜底的基石。陈行甲分析了许多曾经轰轰烈烈、由极具号召力和远见的理想主义者发起的民间慈善最终走向衰败的根本症结:许多发起人在接触底层弱势群体时,有意无意地把弱势群体的深重苦难归咎于政府的不作为,对受助者灌输“你看政府都不管你,只有我管你”的情绪,实质上挑拨了受助群体与政府的对立。

陈行甲强调,诸如困境儿童救助等重大社会问题积弊已久,绝非一日之寒;即便政府倾尽全力,单靠体制力量也难以面面俱到,这正是民间力量弥足珍贵之处。民间力量应当作为国家社会治理体系和治理能力现代化的有力补充,“去帮忙,而不是去添乱”,必须扮演好建设性伙伴的角色。

[58:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=3481s) 绝不吃回头草:公益更缺敢于创新的陈行甲

面对主持人提出的“如果慈善做得很成功,后半生是否会考虑重返体制”的假设,陈行甲当场幽默调侃道:“你以为政府是菜市场啊?你想回去就回去啊?”他笑着指出这种天真的假设带有明显的海外视角滤镜,体制的进出绝非个人单方面意愿所能决定。

但陈行甲随后严肃地表明了内心的态度:若公益事业进展顺利,自己完全没有必要重返体制。以民间公益人的身份,通过高效协同政府来为人民服务,同样具有极高的社会价值。在他看来,“政府不缺一个陈行甲这样的好官,但现在的中国公益领域,或许真的很需要一个敢于创新、不怕失败的陈行甲”。

[59:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=3547s) 马斯洛最高层需求:从“极度幸运”到回馈弱者

谈及人性的欲望时,陈行甲坦言自己作为肉体凡胎不可能没有欲望,否则便等同于生命终结。按照马斯洛需求层次理论,他目前的欲望集中在最顶端的第五层——自我实现的需求,去追问“人来这世上走一遭究竟为了什么”。

这种终极追求并非少年得志时的虚妄狂言,而是在经历人生波折后逐渐生发的顿悟。陈行甲感慨自己本是深山里走出来的极普通的孩子,人生起点极低,却收获了远超预期的命运眷顾:不仅考上了大学,还幸运地与心爱的城市姑娘结为连理,儿子如今也出类拔萃令他深感自豪。

- **对个人运气的回馈**:陈行甲虽然早年丧母经历诸多苦难,但深感这世上承受不幸的人何其多; - **“传薪计划”的现实对照**:在项目救助的特困儿童中,高达 90% 失去父亲,另有 10% 失去母亲;陈行甲将自己视为这些孩子的父母; - **化作他人的光**:既然自己从低谷走出并获得了超额的幸运,就理应用这份好运去赋能、托举那些正处于泥淖中的弱者。

[01:02:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=3731s) 《在峡江的转弯处》的宿命追寻与母爱的终极和解

主持人引用了陈行甲在自传《在峡江的转弯处》后记中的话:“坚信对弱者哭声的同理心,是生而为人的意义之一。”陈行甲对此深表共鸣,认为这是他内心深处不可动摇的使命与价值追求。

当被问及用什么词汇来定义自己生命的终极归宿时,陈行甲给出的答案是“通透与欢喜”。这种生命的底色直接承袭自他的母亲。谈及早逝的母亲,陈行甲动情地分享了自己与伤痛过往达成的最终和解:他早已彻底接受了母亲离世的客观现实,而最深层次的和解在于他想通了一个道理——“我是她身上掉下来的一块肉,是她把我抚养长大;如果我能活得像她一样通透温暖,不就证明她还活在人世间吗?”

陈行甲这一番发自肺腑的感悟,让同有丧母之痛的主持人深受震撼,坦言这番话在瞬间击中了内心,带来了极大的精神释怀与疗愈。

## Notable quotes > [00:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=1s) 你的基金会那么大,拿个八万十万的算什么? — 阿良父亲

> [00:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=1s) 我不能理解,我们都是……人啊! — 前线志愿者

> [05:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=337s) 在你祝福了他们的时候,你更深地被他们祝福了。 — 陈行甲

> [11:35](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=695s) 怎么说呢,她真是一个伟大的母亲……并不是我们完全原谅了他们,我觉得是她原谅了我们,她原谅了这个社会。 — 陈行甲

> [18:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=1103s) 甲儿,出来。甲儿,乖乖地出来。 — 陈行甲母亲

> [18:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=1103s) 我生病了,我真的生病了。 — 陈行甲

> [41:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=2467s) 爱与工作是治愈一切的良药 — 弗洛伊德

> [47:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=2825s) 就让我们这样走下去,在这条布满风沙的路上,我们要护住心中那团燃烧的希望。 — 席慕蓉

> [58:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=3481s) 你以为政府是菜市场啊?你想回去就回去啊? — 陈行甲

> [58:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=3481s) 政府不缺一个陈行甲这样的好官,但现在的中国公益领域,或许真的很需要一个敢于创新、不怕失败的陈行甲。 — 陈行甲

> [01:02:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=3731s) 坚信对弱者哭声的同理心,是生而为人的意义之一。 — 陈行甲

> [01:02:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ&t=3731s) 我是她身上掉下来的一块肉,是她把我抚养长大;如果我能活得像她一样通透温暖,不就证明她还活在人世间吗? — 陈行甲

## Mentioned 陈行甲, 周轶君, 窦文涛, 恒晖基金会, 巴东县, 珍·古道尔, 阿良, 解放军江苏心理卫生中心, 湖北大学, 吴乙中, 读者, 青年文摘, 中国书法家协会, 弗洛伊德, 席慕蓉, 传火宝贝, 传薪计划, 在峡江的转弯处, 圆桌派, 第一人称复数

## Video description 💡订阅我们,换个视角看懂万象: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwiWVn-hZq3_zuOk570kyGA

简介:《圆桌派》节目以圆桌为名,旨在体现圆桌席上人人平等,每期由窦文涛携手三位嘉宾,还原在生活中发生在圆桌旁、海阔天空的精彩聊天。延续真实不“装”的窦式主持风格,立足网络,放眼世间,神侃包罗万象的话题,嬉笑言谈中彼此迸发出智慧火花。 《锵锵行天下》第三季江南烟雨,一路如一副徐徐铺开的画卷。访名山,赏奇石,寻妙缘。窦文涛与老友们浸润在江南的诗情画意中。数十天的路程,在十三集的正片中难以完整展现,有太多的行程与内容难以取舍,所以借由本次《锵锵拾遗》,再次将未播出的素材进行汇编拾遗,将此次江南之行的更多精彩内容奉献给观众,让观众重温江南烟雨中的谈笑风生。 主持人:窦文涛 嘉宾:陈坤 / 周迅 / 蒋方舟 / 王晶 / 梁文道 / 马家辉 / 周轶君 / 武志红 / 马未都 / 张亚东 / 严歌苓 / 汪海林 / 金宇澄 / 李玫瑾

【圆桌派 窦文涛】人性 · 社会 · 认知:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYxKs_Kmt18U 【鸿观·宋鸿兵】金融 · 权力 · 逻辑:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLcTh2pbxeb-o 【观复嘟嘟 马未都】历史 · 收藏 · 人生:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLOBX8CQ3IYr0 【第一人称复数 周轶君】青年 · 女性 · 世界:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLE0SKDns16wY 【风马牛书房 冯仑】财富 · 经济 · 规律:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBtYaSLkGpag 【百家新说 尹烨】科技 · 生命 · 未来:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIUyn5AuyYUo 【众生 蔡永康】人物 · 命运 · 社会观察:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIOgZ1dPF0JA 【锵锵行天下 窦文涛】世界 · 文明 · 思想:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIJzYJ5gZ-HA

#中国未来 #中国社会 #植物 #生态 #大自然 #经济 #推荐 #热门 #经济 #圆桌派 #纪实 #时间 #历史 #文化 #聊天 #新闻 #心理健康 #中美关系 #科技 #经济 #金融 #香港 #台湾 #hongkong #taiwan #民生 #纪实 #纪录片 #窦文涛 #周轶君 #马未都 #许子东 #尹烨 #圆桌派第七季 #圆桌派 #中国经济 #中国内卷 #中国危机 #地方债 #新能源车 #光伏 #经济危机 #中国房地产 #中美竞争 #科技创新 #制度决定一切 #民营经济 #企业家精神 #AI时代

[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxFW8z8aewQ)

中文简报

陈行甲拒绝重返体制 推动民间慈善转型制度化协同 民间慈善若陷入悲情道德绑架与对立思维必将走向衰退,唯有摒弃救世主心态、以专业透明的制度化机制协同政府,才能托举底层弱势群体并守住文明底线。 陈行甲在节目中坚决摒弃将受助者置于道德低位的“救世主心态”,提出专业公益应视受助者为“服务对象”,追求双向的生命陪伴与能量滋养。结合昔日治理巴东的严苛考验与罹患重度抑郁症后涅槃重生的切身体会,他分享了母亲的爱与妻子的坚守如何成为其生命的精神锚点。面对当下青少年的心理危机与迷茫困境,他提炼出“思考力、同理心、自由”的核心成长理念,并深刻指出民间公益不搞悲情道德绑架,而应以科学透明的机制主动融入并有效补充政府治理体系,共同托举社会的文明底线。 陈行甲主张摒弃传统慈善中的“救世主情结”,恒晖基金会将受助者明确定义为“服务对象”,强调现代公益不是苦行僧式的道德表演,而应依托专业与平等实现双向赋能。 (0:01) 针对2020年中国青少年抑郁检出率达24.6%的心理困境,陈行甲团队倡导以“思考力、同理心、自由”为核心的公益教育理念,致力于培养兼具独立视野与社会关怀的“完整的人”。 (38:18) 恒晖基金会探索去个人化与制度化运营,通过设置500元月捐上限沉淀近4万名小额月捐人,推动公众信任从个人IP转向基金会专业机制与具体项目。 (49:42) 陈行甲厘清民间公益的定位:核心逻辑是主动“融入与补充政府”,充当国家治理体系的建设性伙伴,而非以救世主姿态挑拨受助群体与体制的对立。 (54:32)

Reading summary

陈行甲在对谈中阐述了其现代公益哲学的核心:摒弃居高临下的“救世主心态”,以专业化运作、去个人崇拜与制度化协同体制,建立保障社会弱者尊严的底线网络。 祛除救世主心态与平视受助者 (0:01) 陈行甲强调语言决定思维方式。在恒晖基金会,团队将受助者称为“服务对象”而非“受助人”,提供的支持称为“服务”而非“救济”。他指出,以救世主身份自居会产生道德优越感与被感激的期待,一旦遭遇现实的残酷或冷漠便极易精神崩塌。例如,7岁白血病患儿阿良遭父母相继遗弃,志愿者追踪到父亲时却被索要八至十万元医疗费,一线员工险些心理崩溃。事后查明,母亲失踪一周实为走投无路而从事性工作筹款,最终患儿不幸离世。陈行甲认为这绝非道德沦丧,而是极度绝望下的抗争,公益人员应当陪伴与理解,而非站在道德高地审判。 个人创伤重塑与使命感的源泉 (16:41) 陈行甲将人生转折点归结为严重的临床抑郁症及母亲离世带来的巨大精神虚空。在深度失眠与精神瓦解的极端状态下,他曾在梦境中感受到已故母亲的呼唤,并在妻子的果断支持下前往江苏的专科医院就医。走出重度抑郁被他形容为“脱了一层皮”的涅槃过程,重塑了其认知世界的韧性。他认为现代青年的迷茫与心理危机在于视野与同理心的缺失,因此提炼出“思考力、同理心、自由”的核心素养。对他而言,公益不仅是救助他人,更源自自身跨越阶层劣势与创伤后、出于马斯洛最高层自我实现需求的生命回馈。 现代公益机制去个人化与制度化 (49:42) 陈行甲主张现代慈善绝非苦行僧式的道德表演或贩卖苦难,而是需要科学设计、严谨执行、财务公开透明与第三方独立审计。基金会吸纳了近4万名月捐人,每人每月捐赠10至20元并设定500元上限,旨在汇聚同行的社会力量而非单纯集资。大数据分析显示,后台关键词正从聚焦“陈老师”个人IP,转向“传火”、“新火”等具体公益项目。陈行甲明确提出,成熟的公益应当从依赖个人崇拜逐步过渡到对组织机制与专业能力的信任。 协同而非对抗:与体制良性互补 (54:32) 陈行甲的所有公益项目均坚持与地方政府紧密合作。基于从政经历,他反思部分民间慈善失败的症结在于将底层苦难归咎于政府,甚至向受助群体灌输“政府不管你只有我管”的对立情绪。陈行甲指出,中国社会的重大民生痛点积弊已久,仅靠体制难以面面俱到,民间公益应当扮演建设性伙伴与补充者,而非争功挑拨或添乱。面对是否重返体制的提问,他直言体制并不缺一个好官,但中国公益界亟需敢于创新、不怕失败的开拓者。 陈行甲将文明的尺度定义为社会托底保障的高度,主张通过专业透明的制度与政府协同,让公益成为持续长效的公共服务体系,并以通透温暖的活法完成对逝去亲人与自身宿命的终极交代。

Source quotes

[0:01] 阿良父亲: 你的基金会那么大,拿个八万十万的算什么? [0:01] 前线志愿者: 我不能理解,我们都是……人啊! [5:37] 陈行甲: 在你祝福了他们的时候,你更深地被他们祝福了。 [11:35] 陈行甲: 怎么说呢,她真是一个伟大的母亲……并不是我们完全原谅了他们,我觉得是她原谅了我们,她原谅了这个社会。 [18:23] 陈行甲母亲: 甲儿,出来。甲儿,乖乖地出来。 [18:23] 陈行甲: 我生病了,我真的生病了。 [41:07] 弗洛伊德: 爱与工作是治愈一切的良药 [47:05] 席慕蓉: 就让我们这样走下去,在这条布满风沙的路上,我们要护住心中那团燃烧的希望。 [58:01] 陈行甲: 你以为政府是菜市场啊?你想回去就回去啊? [58:01] 陈行甲: 政府不缺一个陈行甲这样的好官,但现在的中国公益领域,或许真的很需要一个敢于创新、不怕失败的陈行甲。 [62:11] 陈行甲: 坚信对弱者哭声的同理心,是生而为人的意义之一。 [62:11] 陈行甲: 我是她身上掉下来的一块肉,是她把我抚养长大;如果我能活得像她一样通透温暖,不就证明她还活在人世间吗?

Original transcript

[0:01] Take Yixun, for instance, he is my [0:03] mentor, but you’ll notice in my [0:05] monthly reports that we don’t use the [0:08] term "beneficiaries" for those we help; [0:10] we call them "service recipients." We [0:13] don't offer "relief," only "service." [0:16] You see, the identity of a "savior" is [0:18] often rooted in a foundation of moral [0:21] superiority. I am standing on the moral [0:23] high ground. [0:24] >> Even harboring a sense of superiority. [0:26] >> Feeling superior, thinking "I'm here to [0:28] save you,""you have nothing, I provide [0:30] for you,""you are suffering, I'm here [0:31] to rescue you." In fact, this actually [0:34] drains one's energy. Let me tell you, [0:37] the role of a savior, the identity of [0:39] being a savior, will deplete your [0:42] energy. [0:42] >> How do you know that? Have you felt it [0:45] or stood in that position yourself? [0:47] >> I have felt it. For example, let's look [0:50] at the first story in the book, the [0:52] father of A-Liang. That is why I had to [0:54] coach my team members on how to move [0:57] past it. You see, my team members on [0:59] the front lines felt deeply hurt. We [1:02] work so hard, and yet, you abandoned [1:04] your own child in the first place. We [1:06] have been taking care of the child, we [1:09] found you and brought you back, all in [1:11] the hope of working together to save [1:13] the child. And you show no gratitude. [1:16] Then what? Actually, no, it wasn’t [1:18] just a lack of appreciation. He even [1:21] took advantage of you. A-Liang was a [1:23] seven-year-old child suffering from [1:26] leukemia. During the treatment, his [1:28] father ran away, leaving only his [1:30] mother to care for him. The family [1:32] faced financial hardship and couldn't [1:34] afford the medical expenses. One day, [1:37] A-Liang's mother said the child had [1:39] mouth ulcers and needed to go buy [1:42] medicine, but she left and never [1:44] returned. The Henghui Foundation [1:46] received a request for help from the [1:48] hospital and acted quickly; after much [1:51] searching, volunteers found A-Liang's [1:53] father. But he wasn't concerned about [1:55] the child's condition; he only kept [1:57] demanding that the volunteers pay the [1:59] outstanding hospital fees. He even said [2:01] , "Your foundation is so big, can’t [2:03] you just cough up 80,000 or 100,000?" [2:05] This made the volunteers feel extremely [2:07] disheartened. I remember hearing the [2:09] recording of what our team member said [2:12] to the father; he said, "I can't [2:14] understand it, we are all...""Human [2:16] beings," my team member even said [2:18] something like that. When he came [2:20] downstairs and called me, he was [2:22] already speaking incoherently. Right. [2:26] We pulled him off the case, and I took [2:28] over so we could finish this together. [2:31] Afterward, we naturally invited [2:33] psychological experts to provide [2:34] counseling and support, but I feel what [2:37] truly helped them move past this was [2:39] clarifying things for them, helping [2:41] them reason through why they were hurt, [2:43] and why they felt that pain. [2:45] >> Because you wanted to be thanked. [2:47] >> Exactly. It’s because you see [2:50] yourself in the role of a helper or [2:53] savior. So, when they don't respond as [2:56] expected, you get upset. Since you are [2:59] in that "savior" role, feeling a sense [3:02] of moral superiority, you [3:04] subconsciously harbor an expectation to [3:06] receive their gratitude and [3:08] appreciation. Right? [3:10] >> At the very least, recognition. [3:12] >> At least recognition. If you don't get [3:15] that, or if they even get annoyed with [3:17] you, that’s when you end up having a [3:19] breakdown. You’d wonder, "Did I get [3:21] this wrong?" That right there is the " [3:23] savior" complex. It drains you. I’m [3:26] curious, have you ever had the [3:28] experience of being in the wrong [3:30] position like that? Have you ever stood [3:32] in the wrong place? Or rather, have you [3:34] ever been in that kind of position? [3:36] >> Well, let me tell you, I have been [3:38] there in the past. [3:39] >> So that’s why you have this feeling [3:40] and can empathize so deeply with what [3:42] they are going through? [3:43] >> Yes, I have been there. For example, [3:47] during my first year as a county party [3:49] secretary, I found that no matter what [3:52] I did as secretary...The public would [3:54] just flood the internet to scold me. [3:58] >> Because trust had already been [4:00] destroyed. As you were saying back then [4:03] , yes, internally I was very confused. [4:06] I was working so hard and doing my best [4:08] to do things for them, yet I was [4:10] completely misunderstood. No matter how [4:13] positive your words were, how positive [4:15] your efforts, or how hard you tried to [4:17] reach out to them, you were met with [4:19] cold, indifferent rejection. Even being [4:21] cold and indifferent—when I said [4:23] goodbye to Badong, there was a part [4:25] where I specifically thanked a few [4:26] people: thank you, Chongzi, thank you, [4:29] Xiao Zhi, thank you for speaking up. [4:31] Thank you for all these years. Actually [4:33] , I finally got over that hurdle in my [4:35] heart; these were the very people who [4:36] insisted on scolding me on the internet [4:38] for so many years. No matter what I did [4:40] , they would always scold me. But in [4:42] reality, they were just ordinary folks. [4:44] Later on, toward the end of my term, [4:47] they basically stopped criticizing me [4:49] because they saw the changes and knew I [4:51] wasn't putting on an act—I was truly [4:53] walking among them. Right. So, I have [4:56] encountered situations like this before [4:58] . In my heart, I had already completed [5:00] that kind of psychological preparation. [5:02] When I decided to dedicate my life to [5:04] public service, when I decided to [5:06] engage in philanthropy, the first thing [5:08] I knew clearly in my heart was that I [5:10] am not a savior. If you engage in that [5:12] kind of moral grandstanding, standing [5:14] on a moral high ground to move yourself [5:16] , to get a self-indulgent high, telling [5:17] stories of the poor's suffering to gain [5:19] the sympathy of the rich, then having [5:21] the rich give you money to pay for the [5:23] poor's medical bills and expenses, only [5:25] to take photos with the poor and call [5:26] it a day—you are just helping the [5:28] rich polish their own morality. [5:30] >> That is very immoral. You cannot do [5:33] that. From the start, I knew that is [5:35] not the kind of philanthropy I wanted [5:37] to do. [5:37] >> This...Yi Li is asking you that [5:39] question, about how some people in the [5:41] team might suffer trauma. [5:42] >> You don't have that feeling. Actually, [5:44] we both just wanted to ask on [5:46] everyone's behalf: are you made of some [5:49] special material? It sort of feels like [5:51] that. But I don't know if I can share a [5:54] feeling: before speaking with you, our [5:56] program previously interviewed... [5:59] >> Jane Goodall, do you know her? The [6:01] zoologist, yes. I asked her a question [6:04] back then. Since she spends over 300 [6:06] days a year flying to different places [6:08] to give lectures, and she is already 90 [6:10] years old, I asked her, "The internet [6:12] is so advanced now, right? Wherever you [6:14] are...""...you could actually go online [6:16] to livestream and talk to people, so [6:17] why do you keep flying to the venues? [6:19] Isn't it exhausting?" [6:21] >> She shared a feeling with me. She said, [6:23] "I need to go to the venues to also [6:25] feel the energy that other people give [6:27] me." Oh, this feeling—I understand [6:29] now, you are that kind of person, [6:31] meaning you need to receive feedback [6:34] from the crowd, to be given energy. And [6:36] there was another person who talked [6:38] about public welfare, saying that no [6:41] matter if it's a big or small matter, [6:43] the core is that you actually need more [6:45] people to participate. The essence is [6:48] to mobilize more people, so in this [6:50] process, giving and receiving are [6:52] actually one thing; it's not that I [6:54] give to you or I help you, but that [6:56] giving and receiving are the same thing [6:59] . Is that so? [7:02] >> Yijun, you've summarized this very well [7:04] , and I think we can build on your [7:06] summary to follow through and answer [7:08] this question you just raised. True [7:15] charity, at a deeper level, is [7:17] something any one of us will encounter [7:19] in the course of a long life. Some [7:26] people are luckier, their difficulties [7:29] are smaller or they pass quickly; [7:31] others face very great difficulties, [7:33] sometimes so great that it's hard for [7:36] them to hold on alone, or even for [7:38] their entire family to hold on. At this [7:43] moment, we, as professionals in charity [7:46] , go to their side to accompany them [7:49] for a while. To accompany them as they [7:56] walk through those particularly dark [7:58] days of their lives. From the [8:06] perspective of empathy, from the [8:08] feeling of what it means to be human, [8:10] you see the preciousness of life behind [8:13] their withered face. Then you walk to [8:21] their side to be with them. You and [8:25] they share the most authentic parts of [8:28] each other's lives. And after going [8:32] through this layer, you will feel that [8:35] while you have blessed them, you are [8:37] even more deeply blessed by them. This [8:40] is true charity. It is to say that only [8:44] after reaching this level will you [8:46] realize that you are truly in harmony, [8:49] you are truly well at this level. So, [8:51] let me tell you this: I once had a very [8:54] outstanding young person among my [8:57] charity partners. He eventually left. [9:00] He left after we had been together for [9:02] more than three years. I didn't try to [9:04] force him to stay when he left. He was [9:06] a very excellent kid, and why? Because [9:10] he didn't tell me, but told another [9:12] partner, and then I found out. Knowing [9:14] the situation, I said let it take its [9:16] natural course, and I even helped him [9:18] find his next job. It is because of [9:20] this sentence he said to his partners. [9:23] He, he found that after he got married, [9:25] for years they couldn't conceive. He [9:29] felt, he said maybe it was because of [9:32] our teacher, my teacher, going to [9:34] hospitals, to cancer wards, and being [9:36] with these children, that he had caught [9:39] some, he didn't say bad energy, he said [9:42] he had caught some kind of aura. He [9:45] said exactly that. Right. It means that [9:50] even if you think you’ve adjusted [9:53] mentally, can face these scenes, and [9:55] can complete this work of ours, deep [9:58] down, in your subconscious, you still [10:00] hold that kind of perception. I knew [10:03] right then that this person could only [10:05] walk with us for a part of the journey. [10:08] So I had to let him go. If he stays [10:10] here, he will continue to be drained. [10:13] Even if it's not much, it's still a [10:15] drain. But if it's the state I'm [10:17] describing, there's no drain, you only [10:19] have negative energy. [10:21] >> May I venture to ask, is there [10:22] something missing in you that makes you [10:25] need this kind of negative energy from [10:27] others? Why would you need this kind of [10:29] negative energy from others? [10:31] >> That is a good question you’ve asked. [10:33] What exactly is missing in me? Why do I [10:37] need to seek out this feeling to be [10:39] able to go on? Or rather, what exactly [10:43] is it that I’m missing? I’m lacking [10:46] , I’m lacking—it's precisely [10:48] because I'm lacking something. [10:51] >> I don’t mean to target you with this [10:52] question; I feel that every one of us [10:54] who comes into this world to do things, [10:56] sometimes it's not because we have [10:58] immense energy, but because we are [11:00] truly missing something, searching for [11:02] something, [11:02] >> searching for something to push us [11:04] forward, to keep us reaching, right? [11:06] >> This thing, for instance, you—I’ve [11:08] heard you sometimes use the term "sense [11:10] of mission." [11:10] >> Yes. How do I interpret this term? I [11:13] say you must have the sense of mission [11:15] before you find the mission. This sense [11:18] of mission is a feeling that something [11:19] exists, but you aren't sure what [11:21] specific thing it attaches to. Maybe [11:23] later you find that thing you must do, [11:25] but this sense of mission seems to be a [11:27] kind of [11:28] >> indescribable feeling, a sensation that [11:30] is just there, compelling you to move [11:32] forward. I actually really want to go [11:33] back to what you said earlier about [11:35] A-Liang's story. [11:36] >> At that moment, everyone might feel [11:38] that this mother is a [11:39] >> bad mother, [11:40] >> right, [11:42] >> and that it’s even a criminal act, an [11:44] act of abandonment. [11:45] >> But what happened later? Because of [11:48] that reversal—that is, the whole turn [11:51] of events after you intervened. Oh, I [11:53] feel there is something in there that [11:55] transcends what we can ordinarily [11:57] comprehend. [11:58] >> After a week away, A-Liang's mother [12:01] finally appeared; she looked extremely [12:03] haggard, clearly having suffered deeply [12:06] during these days. She expressed her [12:09] gratitude to the volunteers, her [12:11] expression full of guilt. Despite all [12:14] efforts to save him, A-Liang eventually [12:17] passed away. A female volunteer broke [12:19] down in tears afterward. She said she [12:23] wasn't just grieving for the child's [12:25] passing, but also learning that when [12:27] A-Liang's mother couldn't borrow money [12:30] and had no other options, she had once [12:32] worked as a sex worker. Chen Xingjia [12:36] wrote in his book that he does not [12:38] believe this is a shameful thing. This [12:41] was a mother’s desperate struggle [12:43] against fate for her child, and it [12:46] should not be condemned. [12:48] >> How should I put it, she is truly a [12:51] great mother. She is a great mother, [12:54] yes, that’s all I can say. It’s not [12:57] that we—it’s not that we have fully [13:00] forgiven them. I feel it is she who has [13:04] forgiven us. She has forgiven society. [13:07] So, she is truly great. Sigh, that's [13:11] all I can say, really. Mm. Excuse me, [13:15] does anyone have a tissue? Here, take [13:18] mine. [13:19] >> Oh my, this, oh my. I’m sorry, I [13:23] don't have any today, it's my fault for [13:25] making you... [13:27] >> Alright, alright, as we were saying, as [13:30] we were saying. [13:33] >> Oh my, alright, oh my, this, oh my. Yes [13:42] , I think this is what charity is about [13:44] ; we need to move beyond traditional [13:47] disaster relief and try to build a [13:49] social support system to catch people [13:52] like this. People like this might not [13:57] seem that common in the vast crowd, [13:59] right? Those who suffer to the extreme, [14:02] they may be few, but honestly, isn't [14:05] the height of a society's civilization [14:07] measured by whether it can catch those [14:10] in the most extreme, miserable cases? [14:12] That is the true mark of a civilized [14:15] society; it's not about how wealthy the [14:17] rich are, or how cutting-edge their [14:20] inventions are in leading the future. [14:22] That's one aspect, but the true height [14:24] of a society's civilization is actually [14:27] how high its bottom line really is. [14:29] Right? It’s about how well those [14:33] suffering the most extreme hardships [14:35] are cared for; you notice that these [14:37] very vulnerable people don't even know [14:40] how to express themselves, right? If [14:45] they knew how to express themselves, [14:47] they wouldn't have reached the point of [14:50] abandoning their child, right? They [14:54] can't even make a sound to ask for help [14:56] . [14:57] >> In this process, have you ever felt [15:00] puzzled? For example, why a mother [15:02] would abandon her own child. In this [15:04] process, have you ever felt puzzled? [15:07] >> I have, but I understood it later. [15:09] >> Have you ever held any grudges? [15:12] >> No. To be honest, at the very beginning [15:14] , when I first encountered a situation [15:17] like this, of course, I was extremely [15:20] angry. The kids were saying it was a [15:22] crime and that we should find a lawyer [15:25] to report it, but you see, I was the [15:27] first one to stop them. I just knew he [15:30] must have been going through something [15:32] very difficult; he must have [15:34] encountered something really hard. I [15:35] wanted to go and ask him to come back, [15:37] to summon him back, but truthfully, I [15:39] feel that rather than us bringing him [15:41] back, it was actually him coming back [15:43] on his own. I think he—perhaps his [15:46] son, Wu Zi, his son’s calls from the [15:48] hospital bed—he must have been able [15:50] to hear them. I knew he could feel it. [15:55] When I came over a few days later and [15:57] saw his bloodless face, I knew he [16:00] definitely hadn't slept for those days. [16:05] So, that’s why I didn’t, I didn’t [16:07] , I didn’t hold any grudges at all. [16:11] >> He was desperate. [16:15] >> He wouldn't have done that unless it [16:17] was an absolute last resort, so we had [16:19] to find him and listen to what he had [16:22] to say. For instance, we’ve seen your [16:30] friends’ comments about you, saying [16:32] you were a very sunny and optimistic [16:34] person in college, and so on. [16:39] >> Has it always been like that? [16:41] >> Actually, as for major shifts—if I [16:43] were to name the most significant [16:44] change, just one—of course, people go [16:46] through many changes. At many [16:48] crossroads in my life, people would see [16:50] me as being a bit unconventional, [16:52] saying I was like a police officer’s [16:54] trousers with an extra stripe. You know [16:56] , in our day, police uniforms had a [16:58] stripe down the side; it just meant [17:01] being different. But if you’re asking [17:04] for the most important turning point, [17:07] if I can only pick one, it would [17:09] definitely be when I suffered from [17:11] severe depression. [17:15] >> I was a different person before I had [17:18] depression and after I recovered. I was [17:23] reborn. At that moment, I truly [17:27] understood a term from Buddhism. What [17:33] does it mean? Like Nirvana. [17:36] >> Mhm. [17:37] >> It means I have truly seen what hell [17:40] looks like. I know what that’s like. [17:42] After my severe depression, I became [17:44] someone who had been to a psychiatric [17:46] hospital. Don't be scared. Let's change [17:48] the name to "Mental Health Center," [17:51] that sounds a bit more central and [17:53] better, right? Yes, I’ve noticed that [17:56] many friends, even in conversation, [17:59] will avoid this word. [18:00] >> Stigma. [18:02] >> It is stigma; yes, that’s it, exactly [18:05] . [18:05] >> There is a very detailed description in [18:07] that book, saying that when he had [18:10] moderate depression, he felt like he [18:12] was inside a frosted glass house. It [18:14] looked transparent, yet he couldn't get [18:16] out, and it kept getting narrower. I [18:18] was deeply impressed by that [18:19] description at the time; I could truly [18:21] feel that suffocating sensation. [18:23] >> Actually, I had that feeling myself [18:25] back then, because for a few months I [18:26] couldn't sleep at all. I tried taking [18:28] sleeping pills to sleep, but later, one [18:30] day, I found that even with pills, I [18:32] still couldn't sleep. Sigh, I just kept [18:34] suffering through it like that, [18:35] struggling along. I endured until five [18:37] or six in the morning, when the sky was [18:39] just starting to brighten, and when I [18:41] finally dozed off, I entered a dream. I [18:42] dreamt I was in a room made of frosted [18:44] glass on all sides, only about a square [18:46] meter in size. I could barely turn [18:48] around, or rather, I had that feeling [18:50] of not being able to turn at all. [18:52] Looking back on it now, that was [18:54] exactly what a coffin looked like. Ah. [18:57] >> Do you think so? Isn't that exactly [18:59] what it was? It was just like that, [19:00] wasn't it? But I mention this because [19:02] destiny is very strange. We definitely [19:05] shouldn't be superstitious, and I don't [19:07] think this has anything to do with [19:08] superstition. I'm just telling my own [19:10] true experience. At that moment, I [19:13] clearly heard footsteps outside, gentle [19:15] footsteps, and then someone gently [19:17] knocking on the door—though I didn't [19:19] even know where the door was—that [19:21] kind of knocking sound. It was my [19:23] mother's voice. My mother called out my [19:26] childhood nickname. "Jia'er, come out. [19:32] Jia'er, be a good boy and come out." I [19:38] woke up instantly, drenched in sweat. [19:43] You see, at that moment, it was really [19:46] hot, and I was truly, almost completely [19:48] paralyzed. But, I calmed myself down a [19:51] little, reached for my phone on the [19:53] bedside table, and called my spouse. [19:55] Because my spouse was 500 kilometers [19:58] away, and I was somewhere else. We [20:00] hadn't been home for two or three [20:02] months. Back then, I didn't want to [20:05] worry them, so I hadn't told them [20:06] anything throughout this whole process. [20:09] But I decided I had to call and say I [20:11] was sick, I was really sick. [20:13] >> Calling for help. [20:15] >> Calling for help. [20:16] >> I was just wondering, for instance, [20:19] with your mother's passing, do you feel [20:21] like there is a hole in your life? [20:24] >> Of course. That’s why I’m telling [20:27] you, my depression is related to this. [20:29] It's related, but I have truly suffered [20:32] in life, enduring a great deal of [20:34] pressure at the time, perhaps a weight [20:36] too heavy to bear, which might have led [20:39] me to...but you see, the huge void left [20:41] after my mother passed away has never [20:44] been filled, and that is actually also. [20:46] >> It is a shadow. It is a shadow, so you [20:50] see, at my most difficult times, when [20:52] I’ve fallen into the deepest abyss, [20:55] you see, I can feel my mother. Even [20:57] though she is far away in heaven, I can [20:59] hear her voice—it is so clear, so [21:02] vivid; I can even hear her footsteps as [21:04] she walks toward me. Including when I [21:07] decided to go to the hospital, I called [21:09] my wife, and she said, "Come back [21:11] immediately." She said, "Don't be [21:13] afraid, just come back," telling me to [21:16] drop everything and return at once. I [21:18] took a plane back, and when I arrived [21:20] downstairs, my wife was waiting for me. [21:23] I thought, "Finally, seeing her joyful [21:25] face, I'm home, everything will be [21:27] alright." But in truth, I was already [21:30] very, very ill. My wife later told me [21:32] that she knew I was severely ill based [21:34] on one sign: at that time, my son was [21:36] in his third year of middle school, and [21:38] she had to go out, so she told me to [21:40] look after our son at home. But when [21:42] she returned, she found that my son and [21:45] I had nothing to say to each other; I [21:47] hadn't spoken to him at all. She knew [21:50] then that I was ill, and severely so, [21:52] because my son is my life; how could we [21:55] be together and have nothing to say to [21:58] each other? How could we, my son and I, [22:01] be in the same space and have [22:03] absolutely no words to exchange? [22:05] That’s when she knew I was already in [22:07] a very bad state. I was essentially a [22:09] shell of myself, so I decided to check [22:12] into the hospital. However, the doctor [22:14] who received me was, perhaps I was just [22:17] unlucky, but truthfully, that doctor [22:19] was unprofessional. Why? Because while [22:22] listening to me, he didn't even wait [22:24] three minutes before looking at me like [22:26] this—and I'm not exaggerating, this [22:28] left a deep mark on me—he just said, [22:30] "Alright, alright, I've seen many cases [22:32] like yours. Let me write a note; just [22:34] go ahead and get admitted to the [22:36] hospital, go handle the admission [22:38] procedures." I felt that look in his [22:40] eyes, and I was instantly in total [22:42] despair; I completely broke down, [22:44] knowing right then that this doctor [22:46] could never cure my illness. At any [22:49] rate, deep down inside, I just knew it. [22:52] I didn't even go through the admission [22:54] process; I stood right there in the [22:56] hallway and called my partner, telling [22:58] them this doctor wasn't the one. I said [23:00] the look in this doctor's eyes made me [23:03] collapse, and I felt he couldn't treat [23:06] me, so I said I wanted to come back. My [23:09] partner immediately replied, saying, " [23:11] I've already done the work; before you [23:14] even went, I had looked it all up. Go [23:17] to Jiangsu right away, to the PLA [23:19] Mental Health Center. Leave immediately [23:21] , travel through the night, don't stop, [23:24] go now." Oh, I was absolutely exhausted [23:27] ! At that moment, I felt...I was just [23:30] drained, as if my whole being was in a [23:33] floating state. I felt that my soul, my [23:36] spirit, and everything else weren't [23:38] even in my body; it was that kind of [23:40] state, a state of being completely [23:42] detached. When we finally arrived at [23:45] that hospital and got settled, I called [23:48] my partner, because they had asked me [23:50] to call once I arrived. Once everything [23:54] was settled, I called and said, "Hey, [23:57] I've arrived, I've checked in." There [23:59] was this look of pure joy, a voice full [24:02] of joy, saying, "Oh, that's great, [24:04] that's wonderful!""I'm walking toward [24:07] the river now. I just bought the things [24:11] I needed, and I'm going to burn [24:12] offerings for Grandma by the river, [24:14] then I'll be there first thing tomorrow [24:16] morning." It was such a joyful thing, [24:20] hearing them say they were going to [24:22] burn offerings for Grandma. After I [24:29] hung up the phone, I just started [24:32] crying so hard, I really just broke [24:35] down. But, truly, that was exactly what [24:41] I needed. At that time, that was the [24:45] lifeline in my life's reality, the [24:47] final straw for my spirit, the anchor [24:50] that kept me from drifting into the [24:52] abyss. And you see, you see, they were [24:56] able to reach out and hold onto me. [25:00] They were able to catch me. So [25:03] >> You are also very lucky. [25:05] >> I am lucky, I am very lucky. The [25:12] turning point in my life was actually [25:14] when my mother passed away, and after I [25:16] went through that serious illness and [25:19] recovered, I felt that I had gone [25:21] through a transformation, I shed a [25:23] layer of skin. [25:27] >> What were you like before you shed that [25:30] skin? If you had to describe yourself [25:33] in a few words. [25:37] >> Well, if you want me to describe the [25:40] difference between before and after, I [25:42] actually find it hard to pinpoint. But [25:48] what I just want to tell you is, um... [25:50] >> Or forget the difference. [25:52] >> Okay, okay, no difference then, right, [25:54] no difference, so just simple. Just [25:57] simple, but it is simple, meaning if [25:59] you dare to say it, I dare to believe [26:01] you. Isn't it the same now? You... [26:04] >> Even now I still dare to say it, I am [26:05] still like this, I was like this in the [26:07] past, and I am still like this now. [26:09] >> I was in the past, but it's different [26:11] now. It's like seeing mountains as [26:13] mountains and water as water; after I [26:15] went through a process of seeing [26:16] mountains not as mountains and water [26:18] not as water, I now see mountains as [26:19] mountains and water as water again. [26:21] >> So that means what didn't kill you made [26:24] you stronger, right? [26:25] >> That's the feeling. [26:27] >> You mentioned your spouse earlier, [26:29] let's talk about something lighter. [26:31] Your story with your spouse is really [26:34] interesting. You liked her since [26:36] freshman year at Hubei University, [26:38] right, but you never dared to confess [26:40] your feelings? [26:41] >> Yes. [26:42] >> And then, until senior year, or junior/ [26:44] senior year, you both developed some [26:46] feelings for each other? [26:48] >> Yes. [26:49] >> Why didn't you dare to confess earlier? [26:51] I liked her since freshman year, but I [26:53] never dared to confess. That was [26:55] actually due to the deep-seated [26:57] inferiority I felt as a child from a [26:59] mountain village, that kind of feeling [27:01] of not daring. I felt like there was a [27:03] class divide between us, even just [27:06] looking at her back was something I [27:08] envied—it was that kind of feeling. [27:11] Think about it, when I graduated from [27:13] junior high, I was 1.56 meters, then in [27:16] my first year of high school I suddenly [27:19] grew to 1.74 meters, and I’m only [27:21] 1.75 meters now. I weigh 140 jin now, [27:24] but I was 114 jin when I started [27:27] college. Can you imagine? Being this [27:30] tall at 114 jin, what do you think I [27:32] looked like? You see, growing up in the [27:35] countryside, I was a person who went [27:37] hungry, can you see that? Look, my arms [27:39] were very thin, and like that, just [27:41] like that, I went to the city to fish. [27:43] It was my first time getting into [27:45] college, and my first time leaving my [27:47] hometown. It took two days and two [27:49] nights to get there. She grew up in a [27:51] big city, had excellent grades, was a [27:53] student leader, and came from an [27:55] educated family—it was everything. [27:58] >> She was really well-rounded in every [28:00] way. [28:00] >> It was truly just like that, honestly. [28:03] You wouldn't even dare to admit you [28:04] liked her in your subconscious; you [28:06] wouldn't dare say it. Were you even [28:08] worthy of liking someone like her? [28:10] Actually, deep down, that was still the [28:12] feeling. May I ask, how can a person [28:15] overcome this kind of inferiority and [28:18] move past it? [28:19] >> Well, love. [28:20] >> Speaking for myself, love is, of course [28:23] , a very beautiful and magical thing. [28:26] For me personally, it was my spouse who [28:29] helped me get through it. It was in my [28:31] junior year during a class. Back then, [28:34] the girls always sat in the front and [28:36] the guys sat in the back. The girls [28:38] were always more attentive in class, [28:40] while the guys were a bit slack, but [28:42] that specific class was quite boring. I [28:45] guess she also felt that class wasn't [28:47] important, so she wasn't eager to grab [28:49] a front seat. She walked in right at [28:52] the last minute and just happened to [28:55] sit next to me. Then, when class ended, [28:58] she handed me a small piece of paper. [29:02] On the note was a poem. She said, "Hey, [29:05] this class is really boring.""I just [29:08] saw this in a magazine—back then we [29:10] had 'Readers' and 'Youth Digest' as our [29:12] campus staples—and this poem is quite [29:14] good." It was a poem. You see, she had [29:17] been practicing calligraphy since she [29:19] was six years old. Her handwriting was [29:21] excellent, on the level of a [29:22] professional calligrapher. She was [29:24] someone certified by the China [29:26] Calligraphers Association. She likely [29:29] had the habit of practicing, so she [29:31] wrote this poem in pen; it was about a [29:34] kind of fate. She gave it to me. Seeing [29:37] that poem, seeing that title about a [29:39] fate that makes one yearn, a longing [29:42] that cannot be hidden, a feeling that [29:44] moves heaven and earth—I just looked [29:47] at it and... [29:47] >> Anyway, she just handed it to me [29:50] casually. She didn't say much else, and [29:52] after we left the classroom, we each [29:54] went our separate ways. But for me, I [29:57] stayed up the entire night. I couldn't [30:00] sleep at all. I just kept reading that [30:03] poem over and over again, countless [30:05] times. The next morning, I skipped [30:07] class. I decided to skip class and went [30:10] to the library. I wanted to find a [30:12] quiet corner to write the first letter [30:14] of my life. A letter to my beloved, to [30:17] go with the book I gave her. Honestly, [30:19] I wanted to muster all my wit and [30:22] talent—that meager bit of talent I [30:25] had. There was no AI back then, so I [30:29] poured my full understanding of the [30:32] poem into writing my most sincere [30:34] feelings, expressing just how much I [30:36] loved it. Actually, that was the first [30:40] time I had read it. And then, I made [30:42] sure to compliment her handwriting. I [30:45] praised how well she wrote. That’s [30:47] just how it was, anyway. After I wrote [30:49] it, I wasn’t satisfied with the first [30:51] draft, so I copied it over again and [30:53] again. I was very meticulous and tried [30:55] my absolute best to write clearly. Then [30:57] , after class, I pretended to walk by [31:00] her side inadvertently. She didn't seem [31:03] surprised to see it. I just said, "You [31:07] wrote that poem so well yesterday," and [31:10] then added, "Look, I wrote a little [31:12] reflection on it." I gave it to her, [31:16] she took it, and that was that. [31:20] Afterward, it seemed like there wasn't [31:22] much between us, but at least it was a [31:25] starting point. Then, gradually, we [31:29] started to have things to talk about. [31:31] Slowly, on the way home from school, [31:33] while getting water, on the way to eat, [31:36] or on the playground, I would notice— [31:38] at that time, I was a member of the [31:40] school and department volleyball teams, [31:42] and the star player for the math [31:44] department. And I would occasionally [31:46] notice, after I made a good spike, that [31:48] she was among the people on the [31:50] sidelines jumping up and applauding. [31:52] Well, that’s when I slowly started to [31:54] get the feeling that something was [31:55] there. Anyway, that’s basically how [31:58] our story began. So let me tell you, [32:00] the main point comes later. For our [32:02] 20th anniversary, I carefully selected [32:05] 20 photos. These were from our 20 years [32:08] of marriage. The first page was from [32:10] this year, then I turned the page to [32:11] last year, and kept going until the [32:13] very last year. The very last page was [32:16] the photo from our wedding. On the back [32:20] cover, I printed a photo of the note [32:22] she had given me all those years ago. [32:27] >> Ah. [32:28] >> It was carefully chosen, and I handed [32:30] it to her on our wedding anniversary. [32:33] Of course, she was incredibly happy [32:35] when she received it. He called me in [32:37] the evening, feeling so joyful, just so [32:39] joyful. It was like a pot of boiling [32:41] water bubbling over, a kind of joy you [32:43] simply couldn't contain. Then I asked [32:45] him, "Are you happy?" He said yes, so I [32:48] asked, "Did you see my design?" The [32:51] part at the very end, the mountain wind [32:53] . He said, "Yes, I saw it." He asked, " [32:57] Does that have any special meaning?" I [32:59] said I actually wanted to tell our son, [33:02] and for him to tell our grandchildren [33:04] in the future. "An iron fortress, like [33:06] a mountain." Back then, you were the [33:09] one who gave it to me first. And do you [33:11] know how my partner reacted? My partner [33:13] said, "What do you mean?""Back then, [33:15] the class was just so boring, I [33:17] casually wrote down, or rather copied, [33:19] that poem.""Then I just shared it with [33:21] you because you were sitting next to me [33:23] , and seeing that you usually wrote [33:25] poetry or were in the campus literary [33:27] club, I just shared it. You're [33:29] overthinking it." But it was so [33:31] blissful, truly blissful. That’s you [33:34] being humble-bragging on a grand scale. [33:36] >> But why do you think today's college [33:38] students and so on don't really date [33:40] anymore? It’s said that the cost of [33:42] expressing interest or facing rejection [33:43] is too high. Like, if I can’t be sure [33:45] of the result, why bother putting in [33:47] the effort? Can you understand that? [33:49] >> I can understand it, I truly can. Is it [33:52] possible that if a person can receive [33:54] love from someone they value, love is [33:56] actually a form of validation? I don't [33:58] know if it's right to see it that way, [34:00] that love is a form of self-validation. [34:02] >> That’s why I sometimes wonder why [34:04] some people feel so incredibly [34:05] desperate when they experience [34:07] heartbreak. [34:07] >> Some people even take extreme paths, [34:09] maybe because that validation is gone? [34:11] Because the person they love, the [34:13] person they validate, doesn't validate [34:15] them back, and their self-validation [34:17] crumbles. I don’t know, I don’t [34:18] have that kind of psychological insight [34:20] , but back then, you... [34:22] >> You received that validation, the [34:24] ultimate validation. [34:25] >> Do you know what? This extreme form of [34:28] validation is simply that the person [34:30] you like happens to like you back. The [34:32] person you really like—later on, [34:35] before our wedding, I finally confirmed [34:37] that he really, truly liked me. [34:39] >> Wow. [34:40] >> Oh, the feeling! I'm telling you, there [34:43] is a kind of happiness in life where [34:45] you end up with your first love, and [34:47] we’ve walked this path all the way to [34:49] today, right? [34:50] >> So, later on, in your interactions with [34:52] your partner, do you rely on him a lot? [34:54] For instance, like you mentioned [34:56] earlier, when you... [34:57] >> Mm. [34:58] >> When your mental state was so [34:59] completely broken. [35:00] >> Mm. [35:01] >> Would you call him for help at those [35:03] times? Mm. [35:04] >> Yes, at such critical moments, and [35:07] while reading your book, we saw that [35:09] whenever you faced various hardships, a [35:12] single word from him or a phone call to [35:15] him for help was all it took. Is he [35:18] your spiritual pillar? I honestly [35:21] haven't thought about this question. No [35:23] friend has ever asked me this before, [35:26] so let me ponder it. I am thinking, yes [35:29] , I...Since my mother passed away, my [35:34] wife, Wu Yizhong, has actually taken on [35:37] that role. The women in your life are [35:39] very important to you. [35:43] >> Yes, yes, that’s just how it is. [35:51] That’s how it is. Are they my support [35:58] system? [36:02] >> I saw this in your book, a statistic [36:04] from back then. You mentioned that in [36:07] 2020, the detection rate of depression [36:09] among teenagers in our country was 24.6 [36:12] %, meaning one in four. [36:13] >> So, one child is unhappy. [36:15] >> Right, and I also learned that in [36:17] elementary school, it's about 10%, [36:18] meaning one out of every ten elementary [36:20] students. [36:20] >> One is unhappy. [36:21] >> My goodness, that's unhappy. [36:23] >> Your childhood was so difficult. You [36:26] were able to overcome that sense of [36:27] inferiority—I don't know if [36:29] inferiority is a driving force—but [36:31] since their material conditions are [36:32] surely better than yours were, why are [36:34] they so unhappy? [36:35] >> Mm-hmm. Sigh, every generation has its [36:38] own struggles, but I feel that children [36:40] today really have it harder than our [36:41] generation did. Mm. [36:43] >> Today's young people all have it harder [36:46] than our generation. You see, even [36:48] though our starting point in life was [36:51] very low, I still represent the [36:53] generation that most fully enjoyed the [36:55] dividends of this era. [36:57] >> The dividends of that era were [36:59] completely, absolutely enjoyed by us. [37:02] Think about it, I was born in '70. When [37:04] I just started school, just started [37:06] elementary school. When the Cultural [37:09] Revolution began and I entered middle [37:11] school—good heavens—that beautiful [37:13] 80s era, the age of poetry and song, [37:15] right? Then we started college in '88, [37:17] and when we graduated in '92—at the [37:19] beginning of '92—I remember the front [37:21] pages of all the newspapers in China [37:23] were talking about "The spring breeze [37:25] from the East," the vigorous reform and [37:27] opening up. It was all sorts of things. [37:30] Even though rural areas were still a [37:32] bit dilapidated back then, and city [37:34] infrastructure was nothing like what it [37:37] is today, you could feel that the era [37:40] was full of vitality. The society was [37:42] overflowing with opportunities; there [37:45] were chances everywhere. Not to mention [37:48] after joining the WTO, as China's [37:50] reform and opening-up entered deep [37:53] waters, my goodness, how many human [37:55] miracles were created? But overall, our [37:58] status back then was "developing." [38:00] >> Mm-hmm. [38:02] >> Honestly speaking, objectively speaking [38:04] , we are now "developed." We have [38:06] already developed. You mentioned that [38:09] your era seemed to be one that allowed [38:10] for romance. To be romantic, you first [38:13] have to be slow; if it's fast, it just [38:15] doesn't work. But it was great to [38:17] discover that. [38:18] >> Great to discover. What you're talking [38:20] about isn't just happening in China. [38:22] Many college students—I remember you [38:24] once used the term "lost generation," [38:25] meaning people who have lost their [38:27] direction. They have a great education, [38:29] right? They come from good family [38:31] backgrounds, yet they can't seem to see [38:33] that long-term direction in life. [38:35] >> This isn't just in China. I once saw [38:38] that even the elites at Ivy League [38:40] schools are the same. [38:41] >> There was a university president who [38:43] said that many of these kids are [38:45] graduates of prestigious schools from [38:47] well-off families, but he felt that [38:49] while they could solve immediate [38:51] problems because they are smart, they [38:53] didn't know why they were solving them [38:55] or why they were doing these things. [38:57] Everyone felt lost regarding their [38:59] direction and motivation in life; they [39:01] just didn't know. [39:02] >> And I think there's a good reference [39:03] point, like your son. [39:05] >> Yes. [39:06] >> He is a young person. Is he... [39:08] >> A post-90s kid? [39:09] >> He was born at the end of '96. Born at [39:11] the end of '96. If you compare him to [39:13] the majority of young people today— [39:15] and you have the corresponding data [39:17] since you are an authority on this— [39:19] >> Where do you see the difference between [39:21] him and most of the young people you [39:23] observe today? Not even comparing your [39:25] era to the current generation. [39:31] >> You asked about this, and it is indeed [39:34] something I am quite proud of: my son [39:37] is a whole person. How do I explain the [39:44] word "whole"? Even though he doesn't [39:47] have a job yet because he's still [39:48] pursuing his PhD, I don't really expect [39:51] him to achieve great career success, [39:52] nor do I expect him to be famous in the [39:54] future. But I can still draw the [39:59] conclusion even now that he is a whole [40:02] person. How do I put it? Although he [40:08] has many flaws, his values are very [40:11] sound. We are working on this charity [40:16] project together, reading books, taking [40:19] me to the mountains and the sea. This [40:21] project was conceptualized by my son, [40:23] asking: what are we really trying to [40:26] achieve with this new era of [40:28] philanthropic education? Look at these [40:30] nine characters he proposed. I’ve [40:33] been thinking about why he came up with [40:36] these nine characters. Because he [40:38] embodies these nine characters. Ability [40:41] to think. Compassion and freedom. Just [40:45] these nine characters. My son fits [40:47] these nine characters perfectly. May I [40:50] interpret this as your observation of [40:52] today's young people, such as the high [40:54] incidence of depression, anxiety, and [40:56] emotional disorders, which are much [40:58] more prevalent than in the past? [41:00] >> Much higher. [41:01] >> So, when you mention these nine [41:03] characters, do you feel that they are [41:05] actually missing one of these aspects? [41:07] >> Yes, exactly. I find this program today [41:11] very interesting. If we can use your [41:15] platform to spread this educational [41:17] philosophy, I think it would be great. [41:21] First, regarding "ability to think," [41:23] its deeper meaning is having a pair of [41:26] eyes that can see the world. [41:28] >> Is that a high requirement? [41:31] >> It’s not high. You don't have to go [41:34] abroad to see the world, but you must [41:36] have a broad perspective. Don't sit at [41:40] the bottom of a well feeling [41:42] sentimental; don't be misled by those [41:44] whose families are actually in the U.S. [41:47] while they earn "patriotic" money [41:49] domestically. That is the ability to [41:52] think; that is the most basic form of [41:54] thinking. Right? And as for compassion, [41:58] it is especially important. Beyond your [42:05] own academic grades, your future family [42:08] , your house, your money, your [42:10] promotion, your career advancement, and [42:13] your business ventures—deep down, do [42:15] you have concern for the vulnerable in [42:18] society? There will always be someone [42:24] weaker than you, no matter how weak you [42:26] are. It’s really true, this is not [42:30] just empty talk. It’s also about [42:32] perception. [42:33] >> Being able to see others. [42:35] >> Being able to see others—that’s it. [42:36] That is what we call compassion. [42:38] Actually, I don’t require you to quit [42:41] your job to do charity, like insisting [42:43] you must go to a mountain village to [42:45] teach or work in cancer wards; that’s [42:47] not what charity is. In fact, this [42:49] sense of care is really about a child's [42:51] developmental process. That’s a [42:53] dimension I believe must exist. The [42:56] prerequisite is that they see others, [42:58] and going a step further, if they are [43:00] to see others, they must first have [43:01] love within themselves. [43:03] >> So, it’s about having a growth [43:05] experience filled with love, is that it [43:07] ? [43:07] >> Yes, that’s right. You see, you [43:09] touched on a key point, which aligns [43:12] with one of the tenets of modern [43:13] Western psychology. As Freud would say. [43:17] Actually, [43:18] >> Love and work are the cures for [43:19] everything. Do you understand? Do you [43:22] see? That’s why I emphasize that this [43:24] sense of care is so important, right? [43:26] >> Then what do you mean by this "love for [43:28] freedom" you mentioned? [43:29] >> Yes, love for freedom. Freedom is a [43:33] good word, an incredibly, incredibly [43:36] beautiful word. We should shout it out [43:42] loud—loving freedom means I do not [43:45] accept being passively bound; I refuse [43:49] all passive constraints. It means I am [43:53] my own person. That’s why I say [43:56] it’s not just about freedom, but [43:58] loving freedom. [43:59] >> Hmm. [44:01] >> For example, in 2018 and 2019, I [44:03] brought children from mountain villages [44:05] in Guizhou to the seaside in Shenzhen [44:07] to see the ocean. After the special [44:10] difficulties arose in 2020, none of the [44:12] children were allowed to travel. I [44:14] didn't want to stop the project, so I [44:17] brought scientists, professors, [44:19] musicians, painters, and volunteers to [44:21] pack up the wonders of the ocean and [44:24] take them to the mountain villages [44:26] since the kids couldn't attend the camp [44:29] . It turned out that one child, just [44:31] after attending our opening ceremony in [44:33] the afternoon, lost the spark in her [44:36] eyes during our evening activities and [44:38] came to me, saying, "Teacher Chen, I— [44:40] I have to go back. I have to go back [44:43] tomorrow." I asked, "Why?" She said, " [44:47] My father has come to find me.""Because [44:49] my father is working in the township, [44:51] and my mother is also working in the [44:53] town cooking for others. Plus, my [44:56] grandfather at home isn't in very good [44:58] health, and we have a little brother, a [45:01] nine-year-old, so I have to go back to [45:03] cook for him.""To take care of him." [45:08] For this girl, I only asked her one [45:11] thing. I said, "Tell me, do you want to [45:15] stay?" He didn't say a word. He just [45:20] kept nodding like that, with tears [45:23] running down his face. I said, "I'm [45:28] fine." When I went there, the local [45:31] deputy county magistrate came to see me [45:33] , so I entrusted this task to him. I [45:37] knew I couldn't persuade him, so I told [45:39] the deputy magistrate, "Find out this [45:41] child's name, which town and village [45:44] she's from, and her father's name, then [45:46] help me convince him.""Allow his [45:49] daughter to stay and finish our program [45:52] ." The deputy magistrate resolved it [45:54] immediately. I was actually thinking [45:57] about this, about the love of freedom. [46:01] We can look at this girl; she didn't [46:03] talk back to her father, nor did she [46:06] offend him. Although she was forced to [46:10] obey at that moment, within her [46:12] upbringing, she felt she had no choice [46:15] but to obey, right? But before she [46:18] decided to go back with her father, she [46:21] could have just grabbed her things at [46:23] the door and left. She decided to wait [46:26] until we finished our session to come [46:28] and find me and Chen privately. Mmh. [46:34] >> She came to seek help, and she knew I [46:36] could help her. She was sensitive [46:40] enough to feel that only I could help [46:43] her. Let me put it this way. This is [46:47] what freedom is. I think any child, as [46:50] we grow into adulthood, will face [46:52] countless constraints, but you [46:54] shouldn't love those constraints. You [46:56] shouldn't easily accept them; it's [46:58] wrong to reach the point where you love [47:01] those bonds. [47:01] >> But this requires immense awareness and [47:04] observation. [47:05] >> So, this is where we educators come in. [47:07] I feel that as educators in this new [47:09] era, especially from the perspective of [47:10] our charity work, do we still need to [47:12] lecture children on formulas? Lecture [47:14] children on memorization and recitation [47:16] ? If those are things that can be [47:17] learned within the school system, then [47:19] I think, as you mentioned, there is [47:21] this word: "awareness." [47:23] >> You think even a child that small has [47:25] it naturally; you just have to talk to [47:27] them. You actually have to draw it out. [47:30] >> Yes, you need to draw it out, you need [47:33] to light it up. So, how should I put it [47:36] ? This is it—what is education? [47:40] Education is, it is about taking that [47:43] thing every child has inside them, you [47:46] help them find it, you nurture that [47:48] heart, let it slowly burn brighter, [47:51] until it can blaze fiercely. If you can [47:54] help add fuel to that fire, that is [47:57] what education is. So, I actually [48:00] really love a line by Xi Murong. [48:03] >> Mm-hmm. [48:04] >> Let’s just keep walking on like this, [48:07] on this road filled with wind and sand. [48:09] We must protect that burning hope [48:12] within our hearts. We must protect that [48:14] flickering hope of burning in our [48:17] hearts. Have you noticed that so many [48:19] young people today fall into spiritual [48:22] confusion? These teenagers, they [48:27] actually have that burning hope within [48:29] them too, but it needs to be...Actually [48:32] , I would like to share this with my [48:34] young friends: your Teacher Chen here, [48:37] your fifty-something-year-old Teacher [48:39] Chen, the fire in my heart has never [48:42] gone out, and right now it’s in a [48:44] state of blazing glory. I want you to [48:49] see that. [48:50] >> You truly have a way about you. Hearing [48:53] this, I feel you are truly a chosen one [48:56] . We say you understand the suffering [48:58] of the people, the needs of the masses, [49:00] you've worked in government departments [49:02] , and you know how to deal with all [49:05] kinds of institutions. One could even [49:08] say your person, your life story, [49:10] aligns perfectly with our traditional [49:13] moral and value systems—look at [49:16] filial piety. Loyalty to family, to [49:19] your work, right? Dedication to public [49:21] service, right? All these values that [49:24] we consider beautiful are embodied in [49:26] you. Your fans, I've heard it said, are [49:29] very loyal. Among your monthly active [49:31] users are delivery drivers and so on; [49:33] everyone is willing to help because [49:35] they trust you. [49:35] >> Yes. [49:37] >> Right? It's just trusting you; they [49:39] don't necessarily know much about the [49:40] organization, but they trust you. [49:42] >> We actually all know that in an ideal [49:44] state, one shouldn't just trust an [49:45] individual, [49:46] >> but rather trust the entire [49:48] organization or its design. [49:50] >> Exactly. I actually really hope now to [49:59] gradually shift this trust my friends [50:01] have in me toward the organization I [50:04] founded and the cause I am dedicated to [50:06] . I truly hope I can accomplish this [50:16] transition. To be honest, what you said [50:19] is exactly right. I can see the [50:22] profiles of my users in the backend, [50:24] and their keywords are simply "Teacher [50:27] Chen." Right, they are here for me. So [50:31] I thought, through public welfare [50:33] communication, I want to share my [50:35] methodology with the public, to show [50:38] that Chen Xing's approach to public [50:40] welfare isn't about moral posturing. He [50:44] doesn't stand on a moral high ground to [50:47] self-aggrandize; instead, he faces real [50:50] needs with scientific design, precise [50:52] execution, standardized management, [50:55] transparent finances, and independent [50:58] third-party oversight and evaluation. [51:01] Through my public communication, I want [51:03] everyone to know what a truly good [51:06] public welfare and charity project [51:08] looks like. It should be like this: the [51:12] calling of a true philanthropy [51:14] professional is to conduct professional [51:17] charity, not to move society. Using [51:21] suffering to move society, or even hold [51:24] it hostage—that shouldn't be the way. [51:29] Therefore, professional philanthropists [51:32] must be people capable of improving the [51:34] overall efficiency of society, [51:36] significantly and effectively. Rescuing [51:41] those in distress. You can save one or [51:44] two people. That is very good for the [51:46] individuals, but for professional [51:48] charitable organizations, if you only [51:50] focus on emergency rescue, you will [51:53] never be able to save everyone. And you [51:55] won't be able to achieve balance either [51:57] . I am curious, through your efforts [52:00] over these many years, you previously [52:02] mentioned that the keyword for the [52:04] donor profile was "Teacher Chen." Has [52:06] that changed after all this time? [52:08] >> It has changed, which is why I'm quite [52:10] heartened; I wanted to share this with [52:13] everyone because I see hope for the [52:15] entire philanthropic cause in China. [52:17] Seeing this change is why I say this. [52:19] For instance, our project keywords will [52:22] emerge. Yes, among them, because we [52:24] have nearly 40,000 monthly donors— [52:27] people donating 10 or 20 yuan a month [52:29] —the maximum is actually only 500. [52:31] This monthly donation design is [52:32] particularly wonderful; even if you are [52:34] a billionaire, you can only donate 500 [52:36] yuan, because you cannot donate more [52:37] than that. That’s how it’s designed [52:39] ; it’s actually not about raising [52:40] money, but about gathering people. Yes, [52:42] people who share the same heart and [52:44] vision as you along the way. So, the [52:47] data behind them is vast. From your [52:49] feedback and comments, you can see this [52:52] big data. In fact, there are months [52:54] where you would see that "Teacher Chen" [52:57] is not the top, or even in the top nine [52:59] . Yes, of course, I am still at the [53:01] front, but that is ultimately the final [53:04] keyword. For example, this month, we [53:06] have been working intensively for the " [53:08] Spark Baby" project and for the [53:10] children of those heroes. You will see [53:12] that keywords like "passing the spark," [53:14] "new spark," and "hero" will see a [53:16] significant upward trend. [53:18] >> Mm-hmm. [53:19] >> That's how it is. [53:20] >> I previously asked a friend who also [53:22] works in public welfare, and he said [53:24] that, how should I put it, the hardest [53:26] part of doing this is that people still [53:28] prefer hearing stories and having their [53:30] emotions stirred. [53:31] >> Rather than, say, discussing how this [53:34] might impact the social level; people [53:36] don't like listening to theories. They [53:38] like emotion. [53:39] >> Yes. [53:40] >> Those words you mentioned earlier [53:41] actually do hit on certain emotions. [53:43] >> Yes, yes, yes. [53:44] >> It's very interesting. Listening to [53:47] your stories today, I feel there is a [53:49] very dialectical and complex sensation [53:51] within them. We carry a kind of—you [53:53] could call it a pure heart or whatever [53:55] you like. But as you navigate through, [53:57] you are bound to encounter many gray [53:59] areas. [53:59] >> Yes, yes, yes. [54:00] >> But in this, one also really needs to [54:03] gain wisdom. Like you, I noticed that [54:05] when you do public welfare, you don't [54:06] just do it blindly. You know how to [54:08] find a focal point, the scope can't be [54:10] too big at first, and you have to find [54:12] a place where perhaps... [54:13] >> I can develop it, and maybe I even have [54:15] some rapport with the officials there, [54:16] and they are willing to help. [54:18] >> It's a must. Look, every single one of [54:20] my projects is done in cooperation with [54:21] the government. [54:22] >> See, this is mine—this is what makes [54:23] me different. I cooperate with the [54:25] government on every single project. I [54:27] always cooperate with local governments [54:29] . [54:29] >> Is this a path you've learned from your [54:31] past experience? [54:32] >> No. This is my observation of Chinese [54:36] society. The original underlying logic [54:39] of my projects is all like this. And [54:42] why? I want to integrate and complement [54:45] the government. I am doing public [54:47] welfare and charity, not trying to [54:49] steal the limelight from the government [54:52] , nor am I trying to build a presence [54:54] in areas the government neglects. It's [54:57] not like that. I want to integrate and [55:00] complement them. First, my most basic, [55:02] bottom-line requirement is that I must [55:04] report and inform them, then obtain [55:07] their permission to operate there. That [55:09] is the bare minimum. But all my [55:12] projects go beyond that baseline. So, [55:14] what does going beyond the baseline [55:16] mean? We hope to gain their trust and [55:19] work with them. I have achieved this [55:21] step in every single one of my projects [55:23] . [55:23] >> Isn't this something your previous [55:25] professional experience taught you? The [55:27] advantage my professional experience [55:30] gives me isn't that I feel I must act a [55:32] certain way because I was once an [55:34] official, but rather that I know I [55:36] should act this way. In China, the [55:42] government acts as the head of the [55:44] family providing basic public services, [55:47] and we truly rely on it. I’ve seen [55:55] some charitable initiatives led by [55:57] influential, energetic, and visionary [56:00] idealists who started off well, so why [56:02] did they eventually go downhill? [56:07] Actually, there is a very important [56:10] factor here—it might be intentional [56:12] in some cases, though I’d say it is [56:14] likely unintentional for the majority. [56:20] When they approach those vulnerable [56:22] groups to offer help, they sometimes, [56:25] to highlight their own presence, [56:27] intentionally or unintentionally frame [56:29] the suffering of the poor and weak as a [56:32] failure of the government. They say to [56:36] them, "You are suffering so much, look, [56:38] the government doesn't care about you." [56:40] They don't just say the government [56:42] isn't helping; they say, "No one cares [56:43] about you, I will." In doing so, they [56:45] are effectively casting aspersions on [56:48] the government. This is not right. Even [56:51] if most are unintentional, being [56:53] unintentional doesn't make it correct, [56:56] does it? Take any major social issue, [56:59] like the "orphan" crisis; such [57:01] deep-seated problems are never the [57:04] result of just one day. The government [57:07] gives its all, but relying solely on [57:10] the government isn't enough. This is [57:12] why private efforts are so precious; [57:15] they serve as a valuable supplement to [57:18] our social governance system and [57:20] capacity. When you get involved, your [57:22] role is to help, not to create chaos. [57:25] You must be a constructive partner. [57:28] Regarding this, one might ask: "Is it [57:30] just because you were a government [57:32] official that you know how to do this?" [57:35] It is not just that; it is truly more [57:37] than that. I have seen through to a [57:40] deeper layer. At the foundational level [57:42] of logic, I understand the nature of [57:44] the work I am doing. From the moment I [57:46] first dedicated myself to charity, I [57:49] planned before acting. I thought it [57:51] through clearly and analyzed the [57:53] underlying logic of the cause I was [57:55] entering. Only then did I set out. [58:01] >> If you have been doing charity work for [58:03] a while, have built a very solid [58:05] foundation, and have met your [58:07] expectations, as you move forward into [58:09] the second half of your life, what then [58:11] ? Would you ever return to the [58:13] government? [58:13] >> Do you think the government is like a [58:15] vegetable market? You don't just go [58:17] back whenever you want; you aren't just [58:18] "you, you, you." That's a cute question [58:20] to ask, because you have indeed spent a [58:22] lot of time abroad. This—this is just [58:25] a joke, really, yes. This, this isn't a [58:30] question that one can decide on their [58:32] own. But what I can decide for myself [58:35] is, if my charity work is truly going [58:38] very well, then why should I go back? [58:40] Wouldn't I be serving the people just [58:43] the same? I am serving the people [58:45] highly efficiently by integrating and [58:47] complementing the government's efforts; [58:50] from that identity and perspective, how [58:52] precious is that? So, the government [58:55] doesn't lack a good official like Chen [58:57] Xinjia. But perhaps charity does lack [58:59] someone like Chen Xinjia, someone who [59:01] currently still has the courage to be [59:03] very innovative. Someone moving forward [59:05] with a spirit that doesn't fear failure [59:07] . [59:07] >> Since we're talking about how everyone [59:09] has desires, what are your desires? [59:11] >> Oh, that is a sharp question. Yes, let [59:14] me think; you're right, I certainly [59:17] must have desires. I can't—it's [59:20] impossible for me not to have desires; [59:23] wouldn't not having any desires mean [59:25] being dead? But until I can think of a [59:29] better answer, I am still willing to [59:31] tell you this. It really follows [59:35] Maslow's hierarchy of needs. I have [59:37] that fifth-level need, which is the [59:40] need for self-actualization. [59:42] >> That need at the very top. Meaning, why [59:45] did I come to this world for a visit? [59:49] >> Did this need emerge only after you [59:51] satisfied all the lower-level needs, or [59:54] did you have it from very early on? [59:57] >> It’s actually like this: it might [59:59] have been there early on, but if I said [60:01] it was very early, I think that [60:03] wouldn't be realistic. I was actually [60:05] walking along my life's journey, and [60:08] slowly I discovered that I am so [60:11] ordinary, yet so lucky. How should I [60:15] understand that? [60:16] >> It's that my life started from such a [60:18] low point, and the gifts I've received [60:20] in life have been more than I ever [60:22] wanted. Look, for example, I grew up in [60:25] the mountains; could I have imagined I [60:27] would go to college? Right? I went to [60:30] college, and could I have imagined that [60:32] I would like a city girl and actually [60:35] end up falling in love and marrying her [60:37] ? After we had our child, to be honest, [60:40] I just thought, oh, as long as the [60:41] child is healthy and well, that’s [60:43] enough. I never expected—my goodness [60:46] —and I won't be humble here, my child [60:48] is truly exceptional. I really, as a [60:50] father, I hope everyone can understand [60:53] a father's...... [60:54] >> a sense of pride. Yes, that's exactly [60:57] it. So, I never imagined that in my own [61:00] life, while I certainly had many pains [61:02] and imperfections, like losing my [61:04] mother too early, there are so many [61:06] others in this world who also have no [61:08] mother. Right? Among the children we [61:11] serve in our "Chuanxin" program, 90% [61:13] have lost their fathers, and 10%have [61:15] lost their mothers. Right, so I then [61:17] become their father and mother. [61:19] >> But there might be many, many people [61:21] with experiences similar to yours. But [61:23] the things they eventually carry on [61:25] their shoulders might be quite [61:27] different. I think there are actually [61:31] quite a few such people. As we go along [61:38] , I feel I should take the good fortune [61:41] of my individual life and use it to [61:43] empower those who were once like me. [61:49] >> And now you have become the light that [61:51] shines upon them. [61:52] >> Yes, that’s exactly what I mean. [61:55] That’s how it is. So I say, if you [61:59] ask about desires, in this state of [62:01] being, I think the good fortune of my [62:04] past life—as I slowly reached a [62:07] certain stage—has actually already [62:09] been realized. [62:11] >> I saw a sentence in your book, in the [62:13] afterword of "Xia Jiang," that says: " [62:15] Firmly believe that empathizing with [62:17] the cries of the vulnerable is one of [62:18] the meanings of being alive." Yes. [62:21] >> Is that what you are saying? [62:23] >> Yes, yes, exactly. Yes, it’s this [62:26] very sentence, this kind of calling. [62:28] >> The words you use make me wonder if you [62:31] have a kind of belief, one that isn't [62:34] necessarily a specific...... [62:37] >> ism or anything else, but rather your [62:40] ultimate outlook on life or your values [62:43] . [62:43] >> Something that transcends the mundane. [62:46] >> Right, is there a word or a phrase you [62:49] would use to describe it? Ah, if I had [62:59] to use one word to describe my ultimate [63:02] state of life—that is, if there is a [63:05] destination that shines at the end of [63:07] my life—it would be "ease and joy," [63:18] just pure joy. [63:21] >> Is this influenced by your mother? [63:23] >> Yes, it is my mother's influence. I [63:26] truly feel it is my mother's influence. [63:28] So, you know...The reconciliation I [63:30] reached with my mother, with my [63:32] memories, is that I accept it. I accept [63:35] that my mother is no longer here. I [63:37] accept it. I finally reached the most [63:40] important reconciliation with this [63:42] secret. It is the one thing I came to [63:44] realize. I am a piece of her, flesh and [63:48] blood. She raised me, so if I live my [63:50] life just like her, doesn't that mean [63:53] she's still alive? [63:55] >> I must be very honest with you, your [63:57] words have healed me. Because I also [64:00] lost my mother, and these words healed [64:02] me instantly, yeah.