Taylor Sheridan Targets Federal Fraud, Blames Bureaucrats for Urban Decay

PowerfulJRE

The Hollywood creator argues that institutionalized systemic corruption and a highly profitable homelessness industry actively keep crises alive across American cities to protect bureaucratic funding streams.

AI-assisted summary of Joe Rogan Experience #2517 - Taylor Sheridan — original source. Check the original for full context.

Source published: 2026-06-23

Detailed notes

## Background This episode of the Joe Rogan Experience was published on YouTube by the PowerfulJRE channel on June 23, 2026. The episode features Taylor Sheridan—a writer, director, producer, restaurateur, and rancher—discussing his career and his new book, "How Not to Die in Prison: A Survival Guide," co-written with ex-convict turned personal trainer Tom Nelson.

## TL;DR Taylor Sheridan joins Joe Rogan to discuss horse breeding genetics, critiques of the public education system, and the heavy ecological impact of vegan farming practices. The conversation spans systemic government fraud, the evolving homelessness industry in California, and advanced alternative medical treatments like Regenokine and Ibogaine. Sheridan also shares production insights behind his shows like Yellowstone and Landman, explores low-tech espionage, addresses suspicious missing defense scientists, and details the origins of his new prison survival guide.

## Atmosphere & style The dialogue is raw, fast-paced, and unfiltered, blending Joe Rogan's intense curiosity with Sheridan's pragmatic, boots-on-the-ground perspective. It feels like a late-night, sprawling conversation between two deeply analytical peers who share a mutual skepticism of mainstream narratives and institutional efficiency. The tone shifts naturally from dry humor regarding modern societal absurdities to a more serious, gritty examination of survival, frontier history, and the harsh realities of corruption.

## Key takeaways - [05:28](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=328s) The framework of the modern public education system was designed by the Rockefellers to shape children into compliant workers and soldiers rather than independent thinkers. - [09:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=541s) Adversarial nations utilize funding of divisive groups and non-profits to execute long-term ideological subversion within American universities and institutions. - [09:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=541s) California faces extreme accountability issues regarding infrastructure projects and homeless spending, highlighted by billions spent with minimal physical results or transparency. - [17:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1024s) The extensive environmental and ecological impacts of agriculture and vegan staple crops include mass bee die-offs and massive water requirements. - [23:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1410s) The consolidation of the American beef industry sees four major meatpacking houses controlling the vast majority of processing volume, affecting localized supply chains. - [26:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1575s) Taylor Sheridan maintains peak film production efficiency by working with a core, lean crew from 'Wind River' to bypass standard corporate administrative delays. - [35:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=2118s) A highly precise and aggressive US Special Forces operation in Venezuela captured President Nicolás Maduro using an advanced, classified sonic weapon system. - [38:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=2322s) Collective societal and economic systems that operate entirely without a profit motive inevitably fracture and rely on systemic coercion to maintain order. - [51:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=3070s) The creation and proliferation of the 24-hour news cycle shifted journalism into an outrage-driven business model designed to scare and provoke viewers for continuous ratings. - [55:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=3301s) Public health agencies and career bureaucrats are criticized for suppressing alternate medical treatments and manipulating testing thresholds during major health crises. - [01:06:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=4012s) Systemic healthcare and social program fraud siphon hundreds of billions of dollars, facing heavy institutional resistance against independent investigations. - [01:16:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=4563s) Advanced biological treatments like Regenokine offer highly effective, non-surgical alternatives for severe spinal disc injuries by isolating inflammatory proteins. - [01:24:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5044s) Ibogaine therapy provides a highly challenging but effective chemical rewiring that eliminates severe chemical addictions for veterans and addicts. - [01:27:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5254s) The modern 'homeless industrial complex' is criticized as a lucrative network of non-profits where administrators protect crisis conditions to maintain state funding. - [01:41:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=6114s) Mainstream archaeological institutions frequently resist historical anomalies like Göbekli Tepe because they disrupt long-established timelines of human evolution. - [01:57:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7057s) When humans become lost in environments without clear external landmarks, they demonstrate a natural biological bias to walk in a counterclockwise direction. - [02:08:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7737s) True espionage tradecraft relies on human psychology, financial leverage, and analog operational patience over high-tech science fiction gadgets. - [02:22:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8523s) Foreign governments deploy long-game strategies utilizing sleeper cells and grooming local political assets to infiltrate domestic infrastructure. - [02:27:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8866s) Taylor Sheridan co-authored 'How to Not Die in Prison' as a practical, localized travel guide for the 'accidental inmate' to financially assist a friend. - [02:32:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=9120s) The American penal system suffers from a critical lack of rehabilitation, resulting in an estimated recidivism rate exceeding eighty percent.

## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1s) The Deep Subculture of Horse Breeding

The episode kicks off with Joe Rogan and his guest admiring a massive, expensive belt buckle worn by the guest. The buckle was awarded alongside prize money for a horse named Maverick Buzz the Tower, which won reserve at the Futurity. The guest explains that within the horse community, anyone who knows horses would instantly recognize the significance of the buckle, the specific year, and even the horse itself. Rogan compares this to the fighting world, where insiders remember precise matchups and dates from years past, marvelling at how deeply people can immerse themselves in separate "categories of interest" that outsiders know absolutely nothing about.

The conversation shifts into the complex, hidden pool of knowledge surrounding equine genetics and hereditary traits. The guest shares that a stallion he particularly favors named Spook's Got a Whiz produces offspring that are incredibly balanced, quick-footed, and "big stoppers," but they possess a bizarre, genetic quirk: "they see dead people. They see ghosts." Roughly once every three months, these horses will randomly lose their minds, decide a situation is unsafe, and try to bolt back to the barn—leaving the rider to either come along or get bucked off. Rogan jokes that it is like owning a Corvette that randomly decides to drive home on its own, but the guest insists horse owners deal with it because the animals are simply worth the trouble.

- **Horse Name:** Maverick Buzz the Tower (won reserve at the Futurity). - **Stallion Line:** Spook's Got a Whiz (known for passing down excellent physical traits but a sporadic, paranoid behavioral quirk).

---

[02:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=144s) Deafness in Prey Animals and the Zone of Focus

Digging deeper into why these horses startle, the guest reveals that many of them are actually deaf. He explains that a specific gene typically dictates this: if a horse has a white face and the white coloration extends above its eyes, it is usually deaf. Because they cannot hear, they are hypersensitive to vibrations pounding through the ground, which can easily trigger their instincts as prey animals to flee from a perceived pursuer. The guest recalls a stressful moment right before running into a show pen when a crowd cheering for an Italian rider began beating on the side of the arena; his deaf horse completely "checked the [__] out" as if a herd of elephants was stampeding.

Rogan finds the concept fascinating and connects it to Shane Van Boning, who is widely considered one of the greatest pool players of all time. Van Boning is deaf and wears hearing aids, but when he plays professionally, he completely shuts them off to enter a "world... of balls and geometry" where he simply does not miss. Rogan describes him as a "horrifying person to play" because he can eliminate an entire sensory distraction, though he notes it is also paired with an obsessive 10-hour-a-day practice routine. They reflect on the staggering control professional pool players have, manipulating ball spin and trajectories across a 9-foot table with millimeter precision.

- **Genetic Trait:** White fur extending above a horse's eyes is a typical indicator of deafness. - **Shane Van Boning:** Famous deaf pool player who has won the US Open five times, a record shared only with Earl Strickland. - **Table Size:** Professional pool is played on 9-foot tables requiring extreme spatial awareness.

---

[05:28](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=328s) Neurodivergence as a Superpower and Educational Squeezing

The discussion transitions from hyperfocus in sports to neurodivergence, with Rogan and his guest agreeing that almost anyone who excels heavily at a craft has "either ADHD or autistic" traits. The guest reveals he was given medication for ADHD as a child but stopped taking it because it made him feel "lobotomized," leading his parents to just let him run wild instead. Rogan shares a story from his time living in California, where a neighbor's once-vibrant, wild kid became completely flat after being medicated for hyperactivity. Rogan notes that if he had the wrong parents growing up, he easily would have been put on Ritalin, but he views ADHD as a "superpower" if properly understood. The guest agrees, stating that his own hyperfocus allows him to sit in a crowded airport for 12 hours straight writing scripts without hearing a single person, even though he physically cannot force himself to pay attention to a topic he finds boring.

They criticize the modern public education system for being designed "ass backwards," arguing that it actively squeezes the life and energy out of children by forcing them to sit still and listen to boring subjects. The guest highlights that the system was originally founded by the Rockefellers to shape children into compliant, conforming factory workers and soldiers. Rogan expands on this, asserting that the system attempts to program children at an early age because younger minds are easier to influence, whether through religious doctrines, political ideologies, modern school pride initiatives, or, in extreme cases abroad, grooming child suicide bombers.

- **The Guest's Childhood:** Prescribed ADHD medication as a child but quit due to the flat emotional effect. - **Historical Origin:** The speakers attribute the framework of the modern public education system to the Rockefellers' desire for compliant workers.

---

[09:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=541s) Foreign Influence, Subversion, and the Homeless Industrial Complex

The conversation turns toward the funding behind ideological shifts in America, looking at how non-profits and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are financed. The guest points out that adversarial nations like Qatar, Russia, and China have been pouring money into divisive groups for decades to eat away at America from the inside. Rogan brings up the famous 1984 interview of ex-KGB agent Yuri Bezmanov, noting that Bezmanov was "dead on" in predicting how Marxism and anti-patriotic division would poison American universities. They lament that while charity is a beautiful concept, many modern non-profits have evolved into self-serving entities where the majority of funds go directly toward overhead and employee salaries rather than solving issues.

To illustrate this, they point to the "homeless industry" in Los Angeles and broader California. The guest explains that if an NGO actually solves the problem it was created for, its funding disappears, creating a perverse incentive to exacerbate and prolong crises instead. Rogan points out that California spent $24 billion on the homeless issue with absolutely zero accountability, noting that Governor Gavin Newsom actively vetoed an audit of the spending. They mock the state's mismanagement, pointing to a vastly expensive "train track to nowhere" and an incredibly delayed, $100 million wildlife bridge built over a highway for mountain lions, noting that other Western states build functional animal crossings in a matter of months for a fraction of the cost.

- **Yuri Bezmanov:** Soviet defector whose 1984 warning about ideological subversion in America is cited as remarkably accurate. - **California Homeless Spending:** $24 billion spent with an uncompleted audit due to a gubernatorial veto. - **Infra Failures:** A high-speed rail project with only a mile built for billions, and a mountain lion highway bridge exceeding $100 million.

---

[12:47](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=767s) Portland's Radical Ballot Measures and the Anti-Logic "Vibe"

The guest brings up a striking example of political absurdity out of Oregon, noting a radical initiative that secured enough signatures to make it onto the November ballot. Positioned under the deceptive guise of stopping animal cruelty—a concept everyone naturally supports—the law would effectively outlaw hunting, fishing, ranching, agriculture, and the slaughter of any animals, including commercial poultry.

Rogan is stunned, asking, "Are you [__] high?" as they begin to break down the sheer lack of logistical thinking behind the proposal. The guest explains that there are roughly 91 million cattle in the United States, and if ranching and feeding them becomes illegal, ranchers will simply stop managing them. The cattle would wander onto highways, uncontained bulls would smash fences and attack citizens, and unchecked breeding would cause the population to swell to 900 million within three decades. Rogan concludes that these radical policies are never rooted in logic or long-term planning, explaining that "it's all just a vibe, man," where proponents don't feel any obligation to think their ideas through to their real-world consequences.

- **Oregon Ballot Initiative:** A proposed law aiming to ban all hunting, fishing, ranching, and livestock slaughter. - **US Cattle Population:** Stated at approximately 91 million head, used to illustrate the ecological and logistical chaos of a ranching ban.

[15:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=902s) The Portland Ballot Initiative and the "System" of Nature

The conversation centers around the surprising ease with which ballot initiatives can be pushed forward by tapping into public sentiment without much deep thought. A speaker points out that to get something on the ballot, "you just have to appeal to certain sensibilities," which leads people to impulsively support ideas under the guise of stopping animal cruelty. They joke that the voters are likely "on SSRIs anyway" and debate whether the measure will actually pass. According to a *New York Times* article, the entire effort was spearheaded by just one guy who managed to gather 135,000 signatures to advance it to that level.

The guys examine the background of the petitioner, discovering he is a vegan substitute teacher and petition organizer named Mickelson who moved to Portland from Denver, having originally come from Southern California. They react with predictable amusement, joking that of course he is from Southern California and moved to Portland to find a better chance of meeting another "gay vegan." Looking at his photo, they mock his quote about wanting a "system where we're not killing or hurting animals anymore." They point out the absurdity of trying to change a "system" when he is actually talking about nature itself. They note that wild animals will inevitably kill each other anyway, asking if it is somehow less cruel "when a mountain lion gets into a pen of sheep and tears them apart."

- **Signatures Gathered:** 135,000 signatures to get the initiative on the ballot. - **Petitioner Profile:** Mickelson, a vegan substitute teacher and petition organizer who moved from Southern California to Denver, and then to Portland.

---

[17:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1024s) The Environmental Toll of Vegan Staples: Avocados and Almonds

The speakers transition into how young people are easily indoctrinated into these idealistic but flawed concepts. This reminds them of a memorable moment from *The Joe Rogan Experience* featuring Kevin Costner, who explained to a vegan woman the reality of how much life is destroyed simply by plowing a field, farming food, or building a road. They emphasize that anyone driving on roads is actively participating in that destructive system. The discussion shifts to the massive ecological footprint of popular vegan foods, specifically highlighting how "the amount of bees that die every year so we could have avocados is bananas," noting they are brought in from Brazil by the billions.

Almonds are brought up as the other major culprit. A speaker shares a shocking stat they want to look up, stating it takes roughly 19 gallons of water to produce a single almond. One of the men notes his doctor told him almonds aren't even that good for you, prompting an aside about the evolutionary history of the nut. Originally native to the Mediterranean, almonds were highly poisonous and contained strychnine. Early humans—whether Homo sapiens or Neanderthals—noticed that squirrels would eat nuts from certain trees but avoid others, leading them to uproot the poisonous trees and cultivate the safe ones.

- **Water Usage:** Roughly 19 gallons of water are required to grow just one almond. - **Bee Mortality:** Billions of bees are imported from Brazil annually to pollinate crops like avocados and almonds, resulting in massive die-offs. - **Almond History:** Originally contained strychnine in the Mediterranean until early humans selectively bred them based on which trees squirrels safely ate.

---

[18:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1137s) Mid-Show Break: Wild Pastures Sponsor

The host reads an advertisement for Wild Pastures, a service delivering 100% grass-fed and finished beef, pasture-raised pork and chicken, and wild-caught seafood directly to consumers' doors. The host highly recommends their ribeyes, praising them as a high-quality cut of meat raised outdoors on lush green pastures without cages, crates, or feedlots. Wild Pastures partners exclusively with small, family-run regenerative farms in the USA, which helps restore soil, improve ecosystems, and protect biodiversity. The ad highlights that their nutrient-dense meat is 25% to 40% cheaper than store-bought equivalents, offering listeners a 20% discount on every box, free shipping for life, and $15 off their first box.

---

[20:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1215s) The Truth About Almond Milk, Oxalates, and Kidney Stones

Returning to the almond discussion, they pull up data confirming that almonds are a highly water-intensive crop requiring hundreds of gallons of water per pound. As a writer, one guest expresses frustration with society misusing words, declaring his determination to call almond milk "almond juice" or "almond tea," since it is made by pulverizing almonds, brining them in water to leech the flavor, and then pumping it full of sugar. The host shares an anecdote about pointing out the high sugar content to his friend Duncan, who was shocked.

Furthermore, the host reveals that his doctor warned him to cut back on almonds after a blood test showed elevated oxalate levels. They read a fact sheet aloud confirming that almonds contain about 296 milligrams of oxalate per 100 grams (roughly 4 milligrams per nut), which can raise circulating oxalate levels, strain the kidneys, and increase kidney stone risks. The host admits he used to drink raw kale smoothies every single day mixed with apples, ginger, and garlic, thinking it was healthy, until a doctor warned him that he was "blasting [his] system with oxalates." The doctor advised him to cook the kale to filter the oxalates out, jokingly telling him to just eat bacon and eggs instead. This long personal journey made the host realize how much terrible, upside-down food and health advice exists in society, noting that the original food pyramid was heavily influenced by corporations like Kellogg's to get people to eat more processed grains.

- **Almond Oxalate Content:** 296 milligrams of oxalate per 100 grams, or roughly 4 milligrams per individual nut. - **Health Risks:** High oxalate consumption from foods like raw almonds and raw kale increases the risk of kidney stones.

---

[23:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1410s) The Reality of the American Beef Industry

The conversation moves to the structure of the American meat industry. Unlike crops, massive industrialized meat production is highly inefficient, meaning corporations cannot easily centralize it. The closest thing to an industrialized model is a feed yard like Harris Ranch off I-5 in California, where cattle are gathered to feed for 90 to 150 days prior to slaughter. However, grazing cattle is far more practical on rocky, untillable terrain with native grasses. Cattle excel at metabolizing poor protein sources, and the land actually needs them because "grass grows better when it's being grazed" to prevent weeds from overtaking it.

While four major packing houses historically controlled over 90% of the beef industry, the guest explains that the COVID-19 pandemic completely changed the landscape for the better. It allowed smaller farmers and ranchers to bypass the system by opening smaller, USDA-approved facilities that process only about 50 head of cattle an hour instead of 800. This enables consumers to buy high-quality beef directly from local ranchers rather than eating cheap imported meat from Brazil or "some Australian killer bull" when buying a standard burger. High-end steakhouses source their beef from dedicated regions like Texas, Iowa, Nebraska, and Montana, where smaller operations dedicate the necessary time to raise premium beef.

- **Market Control:** Four major meatpacking houses traditionally controlled over 90% of the U.S. beef industry. - **Processing Scale:** Large centralized plants process around 800 head of cattle per hour, whereas smaller local USDA facilities process around 50. - **Premium Beef States:** Texas, Iowa, Nebraska, and Montana are identified as the premier regions for high-quality steakhouse beef.

---

[26:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1575s) Life on the 6666 Ranch and Taylor Sheridan's Work Ethic

To illustrate the lean operations of large ranches, the guest points to the famous Four Sixes (6666) Ranch, which spans a massive 300,000 acres but is managed by a mere 12 cowboys. The host is stunned, asking how they keep track of everything. The guest explains the terminology and organizational breakdown: the ranch is split into regional camps, such as "South Camp" in Guthrie, which manages 50,000 acres. That camp is further divided into multiple pastures ranging from 7,000 to 14,000 acres. Each individual cowboy holds the immense responsibility of managing 35,000 to 50,000 acres entirely on their own.

The host observes that the guest's television shows, particularly *Yellowstone*, successfully romanticized the brutal, grueling reality of hard work, making audiences fall in love with a simplistic, dedicated way of life they didn't even know they appreciated. The guest notes that this lifestyle offers a uniquely American sense of freedom. When a cowboy is sent out to South Camp with a string of horses, they are told, "See you in a week or so. Go figure [ __ ] out." There are no corporate meetings; they simply live on the land and know every inch of it, making a 90-mile trip to town once a week to stock up on supplies. He adds that these modern cowboys are highly educated, with almost all of his cowboys holding ranch management degrees from schools like Texas Tech, TCU, or Texas A&M. The ranch also employs full-time, on-site veterinarians specializing in large animals, typically educated at top-tier schools like Colorado State.

Struck by the scale of it all, the host asks, "How the [ __ ] do you pay attention to everything? You're running a gigantic ranch and you have about 48 TV shows." The guest credits his incredible efficiency to his core film crew, the exact same lean team he made the movie *Wind River* with when they had no money. He laughs remembering a time they were freezing at 7 below zero in northern Utah with no producers in sight, joking to his Director of Photography, Ben Richardson, that they could have run off to Hawaii with the budget and no one would have known for a week. That tight-knit team stuck together to produce *Yellowstone*, *Mayor of Kingstown*, *1883*, *1923*, *Special Ops: Lioness*, and *Landman*. By promoting exclusively from within—turning production assistants into first Assistant Directors and camera operators into directors—they eliminate the bloated corporate meetings and "tone meetings" that plague the rest of Hollywood.

- **Ranch Dimensions:** The 6666 Ranch encompasses 300,000 acres, managed by only 12 cowboys. - **Cowboy Territory:** A single cowboy is responsible for monitoring between 35,000 and 50,000 acres of land. - **Top Ranch Management & Vet Schools:** Texas Tech, TCU, Texas A&M, and Colorado State University. - **Sheridan's Film Crew Collaborations:** *Wind River*, *Yellowstone*, *Mayor of Kingstown*, *1883*, *1923*, *Special Ops: Lioness*, and *Landman*.

[31:28](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1888s) Streamlining Production and the Network Mentality

Television networks thrive on oversight because it gives middle management "a reason for their existence". This often manifests in tedious requirements like a "prop show-and-tell," where production teams are forced to present and get permission for every item used on screen. To bypass this inefficiency, the production has established a strict protocol: "I don't ever have to pick a Bick lighter again." By making these decisions once and reusing identical props across multiple shows, they have drastically streamlined the entire process.

While a typical television show requires 12 weeks of prep time before filming begins, this operation cuts that window down to just four weeks. This rapid, chaotic startup phase can initially cause heavy network involvement, but once a show proves it can deliver consistently without missing a beat, the executives step back, recognizing that the creators know exactly what they are doing. The resulting track record is highly addictive television, as seen with the rapid success of *Landman*.

- Standard industry show prep time: 12 weeks. - Streamlined show prep time: 4 weeks.

[32:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1968s) Crafting Landman and Casting Billy Bob Thornton

The concept for *Landman* combines serious stakes with absurd situational humor, such as taking a group of elderly characters to a strip club. The entire series was structurally dependent on securing Billy Bob Thornton for the lead role. Before a single word of the script was even written, the creator approached Thornton with an ultimatum: "if you don't do this I'm not going to do it because I'm not going to chase my tail."

When Thornton asked about the premise of the show, the pitch was straightforward: "basically I want to take your character from Bad Santa and put him in West Texas and run an oil company." Thornton immediately loved the idea, responding, "That sounds [ __ ] awesome." The role fits him perfectly, serving an educational purpose by exposing audiences to the insane and volatile reality of the oil industry.

[33:29](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=2009s) Energy Dependency and Individual Nuclear Reactors

Modern society remains completely dependent on petroleum in every single aspect of daily life. While debates persist regarding its environmental impact, viable immediate alternatives simply do not exist. Climatologists and engineers largely agree that the most realistic potential replacement for petroleum fuels is cold fusion, but society remains 30 to 40 years away from it becoming a reliable energy source.

One emerging concept involves scaling down nuclear technology into individual, consumer-level reactors "the size of this coffee pot" for residential use. However, introducing consumer-level nuclear power plants raises severe safety concerns regarding human nature, given that people still regularly make basic mistakes like putting metal in microwaves or leaving their gas on. Humanity in its current form is simply "not enlightened enough" to safely manage personal household reactors without causing disasters.

- Estimated timeline to reliable cold fusion: 30 to 40 years.

[35:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=2118s) Geopolitics, Oil Supply, and the Special Forces Raid in Venezuela

The ongoing strategic presence in Iran is heavily driven by regional alliances, such as with Israel, and the critical importance of the Strait of Hormuz, through which approximately 40% of the world's oil supply passes. Beyond energy security, control over this region serves as a major geopolitical chess piece against China. Meanwhile, covert military actions continue to push boundaries, notably a highly aggressive Special Forces operation executed in Venezuela that reads like an unbelievable movie script.

In that operation, a team of US Special Forces operators flew in and dropped onto the roof of a high-rise building. They bypassed and neutralized the surrounding Cuban special forces, successfully snatched Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, returned to the roof, and flew away. The extraction relied on advanced, classified sonic weaponry that disabled the defensive details entirely through low-frequency sound waves.

- Percentage of global oil passing through the Strait of Hormuz: 40%. - Main targets of the Venezuelan snatch operation: Nicolás Maduro and his wife.

[36:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=2200s) The "Discombobulator" and Secret Military Technology

The sonic technology utilized in Venezuela represents an advanced iteration of the phenomena initially discussed as "Havana syndrome," where targeted individuals experienced severe nausea from low-frequency exposure. President Donald Trump publicly claimed that US forces utilized a classified, secret weapon system called "the discombobulator" during the January 3rd operation to capture Maduro. This weapon successfully disabled both enemy personnel and mechanical infrastructure, preventing Russian and Chinese-made rockets and radar from firing back.

When pressed by the *New York Post* for specific operational or technical details on how the device functions, Trump deflected, stating, "I'm not allowed to talk about it." Witnesses indicated that when the defense forces pressed their buttons, nothing worked, while the sonic weapon caused Maduro’s Cuban security detail inside a heavily fortified fortress to fall to the ground in agonizing physical immobility. This allowed Special Forces snipers to dominate the area completely, rendering Maduro's previous video taunts of "Come and get me" entirely hollow.

- Name of the classified weapon system: The Discombobulator. - Date of the operation to capture Maduro: January 3rd. - Equipment disabled by the device: Russian and Chinese-made rockets and radar.

[38:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=2322s) UAPs, Advanced Propulsion, and the Evolution of Humanity

The public is entirely cut off from the absolute "tip of the spear" military technology currently in development. The deployment of a functional sonic weapon indicates that the military is likely already experimenting with systems that are four generations past it. Consequently, public updates regarding Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs) spark heavy skepticism: "I don't believe if you knew things you would tell us." A vast majority of these sightings are likely highly classified Special Access Programs testing novel propulsion systems in remote locations like the Nevada desert, though this does not entirely rule out the existence of actual extraterrestrial life.

If an advanced intelligent life form were observing Earth, their reluctance to make open contact is completely logical. Human history is defined by a brutal, tribal adolescence, highlighted by historical figures like Vlad the Impaler—the inspiration for Dracula—who skewered thousands of Ottoman Turks on posts in elaborate geometric patterns to terrorize his enemies. While humanity is marginally less awful today than it was during periods like Nazi Germany, the capacity for genocide remains, meaning an outside civilization would likely keep their distance, allowing humans to stumble, learn, and evolve naturally without direct intervention.

[42:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=2552s) Self-Determination versus Equity and the Trap of the Collective

As societies achieve extreme wealth, a fundamental debate inevitably emerges regarding social structure: "Is self-determination more valuable or is equity more valuable?" True equity demands that everyone receives exactly the same outcome, moving away from a monetary economy to work entirely for a collective. However, collective systems always fracture on the question of execution: who decides who performs menial labor like picking up trash, and who gets to represent the nation at the Olympics?

Without a profit motive, individuals refuse to take on difficult tasks—such as demanding television production—forcing the governing authority to mandate labor through coercion and gunpoint. Ultimately, attempting to force a collective system strips away self-determination and replaces it with a dictatorship. Historical implementations of Marxism, Leninism, communism, socialism, fascism, and Nazism all share superficial differences but are ultimately united by what Ayn Rand described as "the evil of the collective" and an innate human desire to control others.

[45:17](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=2717s) Institutional Distrust Post-COVID and the Failure of "Hearts and Minds"

Society continues to suffer from the lingering fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic, primarily through a total erosion of faith in foundational institutions, including the government, the media, and pharmaceutical companies. The crisis demonstrated how easily public fear can be manipulated to consolidate political power. This mirrors historical military missteps where a strategy is repeated simply because it appeared to work once under entirely unique circumstances.

The US military's long-standing doctrine of winning "hearts and minds" originated from the reconstruction of post-WWII Japan. However, that success occurred only because Emperor Hirohito—whom the populace viewed as a god—commanded his people to "endure the unendurable" and surrender after the US dropped two nuclear bombs. The Japanese willfully chose subjugation to salvage their nation. The US government misattributed this cooperation to the "hearts and minds" strategy itself, leading to repeated, catastrophic failures when they tried to apply the same flawed logic to conflicts in Vietnam and subsequent wars.

[47:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=2847s) The Dangerous Slippery Slope of Rules and Precedents

The speakers open with a tense conversation about the breakdown of the rule of law, warning that once a precedent is set by one administration, it will inevitably be weaponized by the next. They highlight the dangerous "slippery slope" that occurs when citizens or politicians choose to ignore laws simply because they do not support the sitting president. This erosion of legal standards creates a volatile cycle where political wins lead to temporary, short-sighted fixes that ultimately harm everyone.

The discussion pivots directly into the real-world consequences of this dynamic, citing the tactics used during ICE immigration raids. One speaker clarifies that while they do not support illegal criminals remaining in the country, the methodology used was deeply alarming: masked, militarized police operating with no visible ID, given only seven weeks of training, and snatching people off city streets. This aggressive approach mistakenly swept up many American citizens who had to be released later. The speakers argue that by accepting militarized policing to expedite immigration enforcement, the public cleared a path for the opposing political party to use identical authoritarian tactics for a different crisis.

They argue that this exact precedent was mirrored during the COVID-19 pandemic. For instance, in Minnesota, the National Guard and local law enforcement were deployed to enforce lockdowns, marching down public streets with firearms and "yelling at people to get in your house over a cold." The speakers emphasize that while people might justify harsh executive overreach if it targets a group they dislike—such as "bad immigrants"—they fail to see that the mechanism itself will eventually be turned against them by the next administration.

- The immigration laws enforced under these controversial methods are the exact same rules that were on the books during the Obama and Clinton administrations; only the tactical methodology shifted. - The speakers criticize politicians in Washington for suffering from extreme short-sightedness, focused entirely on the next election cycle rather than long-term governance. - Over-correcting the structures of government when one side is out of power has led to mainstream political discussions about eliminating the electoral college, ending the filibuster, and packing the courts.

---

[51:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=3070s) Term Limits, Political Wealth, and the Broken News Media

The conversation shifts to legislative solutions, with both speakers agreeing that the single most critical law needed is the implementation of strict term limits. They propose a maximum cap of 12 years in Congress and 12 years in the Senate, which they describe as "more than enough time" for public service. The focus quickly turns to intense frustration regarding how career politicians amass immense wealth while in office. They point specifically to former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, questioning how a public servant can achieve a net worth of roughly $400 million on a standard $175,000 annual salary. They allege that she and many others achieve "super-millionaire" status by capitalizing on initial public offerings (IPOs), such as passing legislation that allows companies like Visa to go public while securing a massive personal stake in the stock.

The speakers express deep cynicism about the lack of accountability, noting that politicians will look a reporter "dead in the eye" and lie about public financial records. They note that the public simply accepts this corruption because regular citizens are too exhausted by their own daily lives, families, and mortgages to mount an effective protest. This exhaustion is compounded by a total breakdown of trust in the media. One speaker shares that they find it nearly impossible to form solid political opinions because they lack the hours required to sift through the disinformation on social media, and they can no longer rely on mainstream news networks that have completely abandoned impartiality.

To illustrate when this media bias began, a speaker recalls a childhood memory of a presidential debate involving candidate Jack Kemp. While the news anchor—believed to be Dan Rather—introduced every other candidate by their prestigious academic titles, Harvard degrees, or senatorial achievements, he introduced Kemp simply as a "backup quarterback and born-again Christian." The speaker remembers this as the exact moment they realized the media was no longer delivering unbiased information, but was actively trying to make choices for the voter. They point to the creation of CNN and the 24-hour news cycle as the ultimate downfall of journalism, explaining that when there is no active war to cover, networks must fabricate outrage to fill airtime.

- The speakers advocate for limiting senators to two six-year terms to end career-politician wealth cycles. - Representative Ro Khanna is mentioned as another politician being actively called out on Twitter for wealth accumulation. - The modern 24-hour news business model is explicitly defined by the speakers as: "piss them off and scare the [ __ ] out of them" to keep viewership up, while intentionally ignoring stories that upset major corporate sponsors.

---

[55:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=3301s) The Wuhan Lab, Hydroxychloroquine, and the Suppression of Alternate Narratives

The dialogue intensifies around media censorship and suppressed political bombshells, centering on a recent press conference held by Tulsi Gabbard in her capacity as Director of National Intelligence. In her final actions before leaving office, Gabbard alleged that Dr. Anthony Fauci lied directly to Congress regarding the use of American tax dollars to fund dangerous gain-of-function research through the EcoHealth Alliance at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The speakers voice intense frustration that mainstream media outlets have almost completely buried the story, treating it as a polarized, unproven political stunt rather than investigating the claims.

The speakers marvel at how text-based establishment media and news anchors maintained a straight face for years insisting COVID-19 originated strictly from a wet market, when a lab leak was "flagrantly obvious." They reminisce about comedian Jon Stewart’s famous appearance on *The Late Show with Stephen Colbert*, where Stewart completely broke late-night norms by loudly and aggressively asserting the lab-leak theory while Colbert actively tried to "block his bit" and maintain the establishment line. The speakers note that Stewart's bit required immense courage at the time because anyone associating the virus with a Wuhan lab was immediately castigated and "conflated with racism."

The conversation expands into a critique of the medical establishment's handling of alternative treatments, specifically Ivermectin. A speaker notes that while the media heavily mocked him for taking "horse dewormer," a simple search of the CDC's own website at the time revealed peer-reviewed studies detailing the antiviral properties and efficacy of Ivermectin against COVID-19. They highlight the bizarre contradiction of a government mocking a drug while its own official websites hosted documentation validating its properties. This systemic dishonesty, they argue, sent a permanent shockwave through the public, entirely eroding what little trust remained in public health institutions and pushing citizens into online echo chambers and conspiracy theories.

- Mainstream global print media—including the Jerusalem Post, Money Control, and Newsweek—have framed Gabbard’s accusations against Fauci as heavily contested and legally unvalidated. - The speakers note that Fauci’s legal team was actively begging the Biden administration for a preemptive pardon during his final days in office, despite not yet being charged with a formal crime. - Senator Rand Paul, who holds a medical degree, challenged Fauci directly on the definition of gain-of-function research, but was dismissed by Fauci inline with his standard defensive talking points.

---

[01:01:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=3675s) The Fauci Playbook: From the AIDS Crisis to PCR Discrepancies

In the final minutes of the segment, the speakers draw a direct historical parallel between the COVID-19 response and the AIDS epidemic of the 1980s. They reference Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s book, *The Real Anthony Fauci*, pointing out that Fauci utilized the exact same administrative playbook during the handling of HIV/AIDS. They note that in the biographical movie *Dallas Buyers Club*, the ultimate "villain" blocking patients from accessing alternative, life-saving medications was Anthony Fauci himself.

According to the speakers, Fauci aggressively pushed for the exclusive use of AZT, a failed, highly toxic chemotherapy medication that had been pulled from cancer treatments because it killed patients faster than the disease itself. They allege that under Fauci's guidance, AZT was distributed to entirely asymptomatic individuals who had merely tested positive for HIV, resulting in widespread fatalities caused by the medication rather than the virus.

The segment concludes with a technical critique of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) testing methodology used in both health crises. They cite Kary Mullis, the Nobel Prize-winning inventor of the PCR test, who stated publicly before his death that Fauci did not know what he was talking about and that PCR testing was never designed to diagnose or detect active infectious diseases in a human body. The speakers explain that by ramping up the test cycles to extreme thresholds, labs generated up to an estimated 80% false-positive rate during COVID-19, a diagnostic manipulation they claim was directly mirrored decades prior during the AIDS crisis to artificially inflate case numbers and force compliance.

[01:03:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=3810s) The Political Realities and Scandals of the Covid Response

The debate surrounding the origins of Covid-19 is framed as a settled matter rather than an ongoing controversy. If mainstream news media outlets continue to suggest that the debate between a natural origin and a laboratory leak is unresolved, they are missing the reality: "the fight's over. It's a [___] lab leak." While some media organizations insist that freshly dumped documents require independent congressional and scientific scrutiny before drawing conclusions, the political framing of the issue remains deeply fractured. Right-leaning media outlets present the document drop as total vindication for critics of the official narrative, focusing heavily on a coordinated cover-up and granting significant platform space to figures like Republican Senator Rand Paul. Meanwhile, centrist or mainstream outlets adopt a straighter, more neutral news tone, frequently balancing new quotes from individuals like Tulsi Gabbard against past denials from Dr. Anthony Fauci, noting that no formal judicial findings of perjury or criminal conduct have been established.

The conversation shifts to intense frustration over how a public health crisis became deeply polarized along partisan lines. Dr. Anthony Fauci is characterized as a 50-year career bureaucrat who served under multiple administrations from both political parties, making the partisan tribalism surrounding him completely illogical. "There shouldn't be a right left side of this. It's, hey, a career bureaucrat [___] lied to us." The speakers drawing parallels to past medical controversies, noting that Fauci utilized the exact same rhetorical template during the HIV/AIDS epidemic—claiming the medication AZT was the "only medication" because it was "both safe and effective"—as he later did for the Covid-19 vaccine. This single-minded focus and history of deception leads one speaker to describe him bluntly as a "monster" whose career aspirations and lies ultimately harmed countless people.

Deep confusion is expressed over why Democrats choose to "fall on that sword" and align themselves so passionately with a bureaucrat's legacy. This division is dismissed as a consequence of reactionary partisan stupidity, where one side automatically opposes anything pushed by a Republican president. Ironically, during Donald Trump's presidency, prominent Democrats and media figures—including Kamala Harris and MSNBC host Joy Reid—openly questioned whether the public should trust a vaccine manufactured under the Trump administration. Yet, as soon as the political winds shifted, they wagered their entire political livelihoods on its absolute enforcement.

- **Fauci's Bureaucratic Tenure:** Pointed out as spanning roughly 50 years across multiple Republican and Democratic presidencies. - **AZT Rhetoric Parallel:** The language used to promote AZT for HIV was identical to the phrasing used for Covid-19 vaccines. - **2020 Partisan Reversals:** Prominent political figures like Kamala Harris and commentators like Joy Reid originally expressed public skepticism about a vaccine produced under the Trump administration.

[01:06:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=4012s) Systemic Government Fraud and the Exploitation of Social Programs

The speakers reflect on the deep socio-political divisions of 2020, suggesting that the public is gradually waking up to the realization that the left-versus-right dichotomy is "really just a big [___] hustle to keep you fighting with each other." As an example of systemic corruption masked by political theater, the speakers link massive Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) protests directly to locations harboring rampant financial fraud. It is argued to be no coincidence that these organized, high-profile protests occurred in the exact geographic sectors where independent investigators, such as content creator Nick Shirley, uncovered billions of dollars in fraudulent government payouts.

In response to these independent investigations, California lawmakers even attempted to pass what has been colloquially dubbed a "Nick Shirley law." The explicit intent behind this legislative push was to legally bar citizen journalists from poking around and investigating state-level fraud. While the speakers agree that random internet personalities shouldn't behave inappropriately—such as showing up at functioning daycares with cameras to look inside—they argue the outrage is entirely justified when millions of dollars in government funds are being funneled into completely empty facilities that haven't seen a single child in years. Although some viral videos showing investigative encounters ended up being fabricated "engagement farming" by actors capitalizing on the trend, legitimate state admissions of systemic fraud are widespread, with Minnesota openly admitting they knew about massive multi-million-dollar fund leakages for years.

The conversation takes a darker turn when discussing the deadly consequences of opposing this highly lucrative fraud network. In Minnesota, a state politician and her husband were murdered in their home by a masked gunman who also shot several other people. Notably, she was one of the few local politicians who had aggressively voted against a bill designed to extend Medicare benefits to undocumented immigrants. While the captured murderer claimed that Governor Tim Walz personally sent him to execute the hit—a claim the speakers acknowledge could easily be the rambling of a "cracked out" crazy person—the timing and targeting remain highly suspicious. The immense scale of Medicaid and Medicare fraud is echoed by comments Elon Musk made during a recent podcast appearance regarding his work with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Musk noted that healthcare fraud is so deeply entrenched and dangerous that he initially hesitated to discuss it publicly, stating, "I almost don't want to talk about it because I don't want to get killed. It's that bad."

- **The "Nick Shirley Law":** A piece of California legislation designed to restrict independent citizen investigators from looking into fraudulent businesses. - **Exploitation Formats:** Fraud rings utilized fake hospices in California, empty Somali daycare centers, and a massive spike in fabricated autism diagnoses to rake in hundreds of billions in state treatment funds. - **Historical Precedent:** Former President Barack Obama similarly made a grand public speech detailing his intentions to aggressively target internal government fraud, but he ultimately faced so much systemic resistance that his efforts were completely halted.

[01:11:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=4314s) Inept Governance, Urban Decay, and the Reality of Local Politics

The massive sums of money stolen through systemic fraud are viewed as a "juicy ass pie" worth hundreds of billions of dollars, used to grease the palms of complicit politicians across both political parties. This squandered wealth is jokingly compared to the astronomical costs of California’s infrastructure failures, where a hundred billion dollars might buy a single mile of high-speed rail track or a "second Google bridge." The criticism pivots sharply to the leadership of California Governor Gavin Newsom, mocking his habit of bragging about the state's statistical health while running a podcast to talk trash about his detractors. "Because that city, that state is running so well... the governor doesn't need a lot of free time. It's so smooth." The claim that people are moving to California in record numbers is flatly rejected as a fabricated data point.

The speakers argue that any positive statistics California enjoys are purely structural, remaining left over from the state's natural advantages before Newsom ever took office. The perfect weather and San Francisco's historic status as an incredible tech hub powered by "super wizards" have nothing to do with current political leadership. Instead, the severe problems plaguing major hubs like Los Angeles and San Francisco are blamed entirely on inept governance, a failure to uphold the rule of law, and a twisted sense of empathy that prioritizes people shooting up illegal drugs on public sidewalks over tax-paying citizens simply trying to walk their children to school safely.

A philosophical breakdown of local political duty is offered, drawing from an interaction with former Montana Governor Steve Bullock while writing the television series *Yellowstone*. When asked what it was actually like to run a state, Bullock confessed that he initially entered office expecting to shepherd grand social transformations, only to realize that a governor is functionally just the "CEO of a state." A governor's true job is infrastructure, city management, attracting tourism, bringing in business, and making lives tangibly better. For a city mayor, this operational reality is even more acute: they are the CEO of a city whose core duties are to "keep the lights on, pick up the trash, put out the fires, deal with the sewage, keep it safe." The tragedy of modern big urban areas is that leaders have completely abandoned these basic functions to aggressively push social agendas, running once-beautiful dream destinations like Los Angeles and San Francisco straight into the ground.

- **San Francisco's Timeline of Decay:** Co-host notes he filmed his stand-up comedy special *Triggered* at The Fillmore in San Francisco in 2016, and the city was completely normal, vibrant, and safe; it became unrecognizable in a span of just ten years. - **The Homelessness Industry:** Homelessness has evolved into a highly profitable corporate industry where maintaining a highly visible crisis ensures a continuous, unchecked flow of state and federal funding.

[01:16:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=4563s) The Brutal Reality of Fentanyl and Advanced Medical Alternatives

The compassionate failures of the modern homelessness crisis are illustrated by the sheer scale of open-air drug markets, where individuals are left completely "strung out" on public street corners like zombies leaning against walls. The speakers criticize the current progressive framework of harm reduction as fundamentally cruel. True help does not consist of handing an addict a free iPhone and clean needles to continue their downward spiral; instead, true empathy demands picking them up off the street, taking them to a secure facility with a strict curfew, and forcing them to get clean. While many addicts will fight this intervention due to the overwhelming grip of chemical dependency, the speakers argue that leaving them on the pavement to die from synthetic opioids is a moral failure. One speaker shares personal experience with the extreme potency of the drug, having been administered medical fentanyl by an anesthesiologist following major spinal surgery.

The mention of spinal surgery shifts the discussion toward advanced, non-surgical sports medicine and regenerative therapies. When a speaker mentions undergoing a surgical procedure on the C6-C7 vertebrae to repair a blown-out spinal disc three years prior, Joe Rogan strongly advises against ever repeating a standard surgical cutting procedure for future disc injuries. Rogan shares that he successfully cured a severe bulging disc in his own neck—which was causing his fingers to go completely numb—by undergoing an advanced medical treatment called Regenokine.

Regenokine is described as a highly advanced form of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy developed by German physician Dr. Peter Weiling. The complex process requires drawing the patient's blood and spinning it inside a specialized centrifuge for roughly ten hours while heating it to exact body temperature. This specific preparation triggers the massive production of a natural anti-inflammatory protein known as Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra). When this dense, highly potent fluid is injected directly back into the tissue surrounding the injured spinal disc, it effectively blocks the inflammatory proteins causing pain and nerve damage. Rogan highlights that high-profile athletes like Kobe Bryant, Peyton Manning, and UFC President Dana White have all famously flown to Germany specifically to utilize this treatment to achieve near-miraculous long-term recoveries.

- **Spinal Vertebrae Targeted:** The guest received standard surgery on the C6 and C7 vertebrae approximately three years ago. - **Regenokine Mechanism:** Focuses entirely on isolating and blocking the inflammatory protein Interleukin-1. - **Notable Regenokine Patients:** Kobe Bryant, Peyton Manning, and Dana White.

[01:18:47](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=4727s) Biological Options and the Importance of Spinal Decompression

The speakers discuss the mechanics of biological treatments, specifically how protein-rich serum is spun in a centrifuge and injected directly into painful joints or tissues. One speaker shares his personal success with this treatment for recurring knee injuries, noting that patients previously had to travel to Germany before an office opened in Santa Monica under the name "lifestyle medicine." He recalls having his entire back treated and mentions an Instagram photo showing "a bunch of these [__] tubes" in his back to illustrate the scale of the procedure. Beyond biologicals, he emphasizes that daily decompression is crucial for counteracting the heavy spinal pressure caused by exercises like deadlifts and squats.

To decompress his spine daily, the speaker uses a specialized harness attached to a pull-up bar that straps under his chin, letting his body weight hang to stretch the neck. He also highly recommends a device called a Dex 2 or Dex 3 made by Teeter, which allows the user to hinge forward from the hip without leg support. He shares that using it results in an immediate, satisfying popping sensation in the back. Both speakers agree on the absolute necessity of stretching the spine out to prevent long-term damage rather than resorting to surgeries where pieces of the disc are permanently cut away.

- **Treatment Process:** Centrifugation of blood to separate protein-rich serum for direct joint/tissue injection. - **Decompression Routine:** Daily neck decompression via a chin-strap harness on a pull-up bar, and lower back decompression using a Teeter Dex hip-hinge table. - **Surgical Downsides:** Standard surgeries remove pieces of the disc, leaving the patient with permanently "less disc."

---

[01:20:53](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=4853s) Experimental Discs Treatments and the Back Pain Epidemic

The conversation shifts to cutting-edge alternatives to traditional back surgery, such as injecting an experimental hydrogel directly into the disc. The speaker mentions asking Brigham from the organization *Ways to Well* about it, noting it is still highly experimental and not yet widely available. Another major breakthrough is taking place at the Cellular Performance Institute (CPI) in Tijuana, Mexico, where doctors are successfully injecting stem cells into spinal discs to regenerate tissue, making them thicker and healthier. Professional big-wave surfer and bow hunter Shane Dorian went there and reported a remarkable "30 to 40% increase in range of motion" and a massive decrease in pain within a couple of months. The catch is a strict six-week recovery period where patients can walk but are forbidden from lifting weights to "let it heal up" and avoid reinjury.

The discussion takes a somber, emotional turn as the other speaker reveals that back pain is what ultimately killed his stepfather. The cycle often begins with unbearable pain, followed by failed back surgeries that only aggravate the spine, forcing patients onto heavy prescription opioids. The speakers agree that once a person gets trapped in severe agony and starts taking drugs like OxyContin, "now you're on a clock." They express terror over how readily these highly addictive pills were handed out for decades, bringing up the Netflix series *Painkiller* directed by Peter Berg, where Matthew Broderick portrays the "creep" head of the Sackler family, who generated billions of dollars while fueling the American opioid crisis.

- **Cellular Performance Institute (CPI):** A clinic in Tijuana, Mexico, specializing in regenerative stem cell injections for spinal discs. - **Recovery Protocol:** A mandatory 6-week period of rest with no weightlifting to allow the stem cells to properly take. - **Media Mention:** *Painkiller*, a Netflix series by Peter Berg documenting the Sackler family and the origin of the opioid epidemic.

---

[01:24:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5044s) The Generational Carnage of Opioids and the Power of Ibogaine

The speakers fiercely condemn the Sackler family and corporate executives who ruined countless lives and caused immense "generational damage" while retiring peacefully to country clubs. They note that the widespread over-prescription of pills served as the direct gateway to the modern fentanyl crisis, pointing out how Florida's notorious "pain management centers" acted as legal pharmacies dispensing nothing but OxyContin. They marvel at the terrifying potency of fentanyl, remarking that a lethal dose looks shockingly minuscule when compared next to a penny, yet it has turned entire areas of cities like Philadelphia into scenes of "bent over zombies."

To combat this crisis, they highlight a promising psychedelic treatment: Ibogaine, derived from the African iboga tree. The speaker details an initiative pushed in Texas by Rick Perry and Brian Huard to grant veterans and addicts the "right to try" this potent substance. Unlike recreational drugs, Ibogaine is described as an intensely challenging, non-fun 24-hour experience that forces a person to review their life like a movie, confronting the pain they have caused others while experiencing physical symptoms like vomiting and diarrhea. Remarkably, this grueling trip chemically rewires the brain, eliminating addictions to alcohol, cocaine, or gambling in just one or two doses, while demonstrating massive neuroregenerative properties.

- **Fentanyl Potency:** Lethal dosage is visibly minute when placed next to a standard U.S. penny. - **Ibogaine Source:** Derived naturally from the African iboga tree; possesses zero recreational appeal. - **Treatment Window:** Typically a 12 to 24-hour intense personal and psychological review process that rewires addiction pathways.

---

[01:27:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5254s) Political Backing, Veteran Success, and the Homeless Industrial Complex

Former Texas Governor Rick Perry, previously a staunch anti-drug conservative, has made promoting Ibogaine his primary life focus after witnessing its impact on veterans suffering from PTSD. Perry's personal medical scans revealed that his own age-related brain atrophy was reduced by 25% shortly after trying Ibogaine, and six months later, the atrophy was entirely gone. The speaker notes that pharmaceutical companies fiercely dislike this alternative, but when he bypassed them to speak directly to Donald Trump, the former president was incredibly open to it, asking, "You looking for FDA approval? Like, let's do it," before signing a bill a week later at the White House. Numerous prominent veterans, including Navy SEAL Marcus Latrell (*Lone Survivor*), Sean Ryan, and Dakota Meyer, have experienced life-changing recoveries from severe alcoholism and trauma at Ibogaine retreats in Mexico and Costa Rica.

The speaker laments that instead of providing Ibogaine retreats to heal the addicted homeless population, cities choose to distribute needles and iPhones, effectively profiting off human suffering. They criticize the "homeless industrial complex," identifying most modern non-profits and charities as lucrative scams where administrators in cities like Los Angeles pull in extraordinary salaries without ever intending to solve the actual problems. They refer to these executives as "performative entrepreneurs" who pitch superficial solutions to the government to secure funding, knowing that if they actually cured the issue, their stream of revenue would instantly vanish.

- **Rick Perry’s Results:** Total reversal of age-related brain atrophy at 73/74 years old, validated by medical body scans. - **International Retreat Locations:** Primarily hosted in Mexico and Costa Rica due to U.S. regulatory restrictions. - **Political Action:** A direct meeting with Donald Trump led to a swift White House signing initiative to bypass pharmaceutical delays.

---

[01:31:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5512s) Stripping Away the Noise for a Simpler, Pure Reality

In contrast to the fraud, political nonsense, and corporate grift pumped into society daily, the speakers find a deep cultural resonance in media like the television show *Yellowstone*. The series appeals to audiences because it portrays characters who are proud to work hard and who derive a profound sense of satisfaction from a grounded, unpretentious lifestyle. The speaker ponders whether, beneath all modern distractions, what everyone truly desires is something elemental: "just a sleeping bag and the stars," cooking dinner over an open fire, and laughing honestly with friends with a horse tied to a tree.

They conclude that while living close to nature is a massive endeavor requiring immense practice, preparation, and hard physical labor—such as packing gear, hiking deep into the wilderness, and setting up camp long before a bow hunt even begins—there is an undeniable purity to it. Out there in the wilderness, away from the systemic deception of modern society, life becomes completely transparent with "no ifs, ands, or buts."

[01:33:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5592s) The Siren Song of Self-Reliance and the Siberian Taiga

The completion of self-sufficient tasks brings a unique sense of reward, prompting an allure to a simpler lifestyle that draws people in deep. For instance, third-generation cowboys who went to college and earned degrees in ranch management happily return to the land to make just \$3,000 a month. This pull toward an uncomplicated, rugged existence is perfectly captured in the Werner Herzog documentary *Happy People: A Year in the Taiga*. The film follows trappers living along the Taiga River in Siberia whose entire lives revolve around trapping, hunting, and fishing.

Despite having no other means of income, these trappers are remarkably joyful, spending their days laughing, drinking, and working alongside their sled dogs. They travel on snowmobiles while their dogs chase behind them to hunt, exhibiting virtually zero signs of mental illness. Although their words are translated from Russian, their core philosophy shines through clearly: "this is how you're supposed to live. This is real life."

* **Cowboy Salaries:** Ranch management graduates willingly work for $3,000 a month due to the fulfillment of the lifestyle. * ***Happy People: A Year in the Taiga* Details:** A documentary directed by Werner Herzog focusing on indigenous Siberian trappers living entirely off the land with zero mental illness.

---

[01:34:31](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5671s) Dick Proenneke and the Ultimate Alaskan Solitude

The conversation shifts to legendary figures who took self-reliance to the extreme, specifically referencing Dick Proenneke. In the 1960s, Proenneke decided to turn his back on a tedious, 50-hour work week to move to Alaska to finally "do a thing to completion." At age 51, he ventured into the deep wilderness of Twin Lakes, located in what is now Lake Clark National Park. He built a cabin entirely by hand using his own handcrafted tools, grew potatoes, hunted, and fished. Proenneke documented his isolated life on a Super 8 camera, capturing footage of himself surviving alone for over 30 years until he finally left at more than 80 years old because he was too old to endure another winter.

While this level of complete independence is profoundly attractive, it sparks a debate about the psychological toll of such intense isolation. One speaker admits, "I'd lose my [ __ ] marbles. I need people. I need to talk to somebody." Yet, they agree that this desire for a healthy interaction with the wild world is "deeply ingrained in our DNA." Turning back to the setting itself, they marvel at Alaska’s stunning beauty, joking that while the winters "can suck a dick," the people who live there are distinctly sturdier and more reliable. This toughness is a survival requirement, leading to a laugh about a man in town who was stomped to death by a moose because he was throwing snowballs at it in front of an ATM machine.

* **Dick Proenneke's Timeline:** Built his cabin at age 51 and lived there for more than 30 years before leaving in his 80s. * **Location:** Twin Lakes in Lake Clark National Park, Alaska. * **Alaskan Hazards:** Complacency with wildlife can be fatal; a 1,000-pound cow moose protecting her calves will attack regardless of provocation.

---

[01:37:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5874s) Heimo Korth and the Early Days of Vice Investigative Journalism

Another legendary wilderness figure discussed is Heimo Korth, who lives near the Arctic Circle and has resided in his cabin since the 1970s. Korth is so disconnected from modern society that he did not witness the events of 9/11 when they occurred, only seeing a photograph of the tragedy years later. His lifestyle was famously profiled in the video series *Heimo's Arctic Refuge* (originally recalled as *Heimo's Arctic Adventure*) during the early days of *Vice Guide to Travel*. In the footage, Heimo survives entirely on caribou and salmon, storing his meat outside in the sub-zero elements like a natural cooler. At one point in the documentary, a grizzly bear attempts to steal his stash, forcing him to shoot it.

The speakers reminisce fondly about this era of Vice, back when "Vice was really cool" and sent young, hardcore journalists into dangerous situations and war zones. For this piece, a self-described "nerd with glasses" from a place like Williamsburg flew out to live with Heimo for a week. The conversation notes how intelligent Heimo is, and they pull up his current YouTube channel, which he runs with his wife Edna. Because Heimo was grandfathered in, his cabin features a government notice; he is officially one of the last people legally permitted to live out there, as building new cabins in that protected area is no longer allowed.

* **Heimo Korth's Tenure:** Living in his Arctic cabin since the 1970s; completely missed 9/11 in real-time. * **Media Appearances:** Featured in the early *Vice Guide to Travel* series *Heimo's Arctic Refuge* and later in the television show *The Last Alaskans*. * **Dietary Staples:** Survives almost exclusively by sawing off frozen steaks of caribou and cooking salmon over wood.

---

[01:41:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=6114s) Human Origins, Gobekli Tepe, and the Imperfections of the Fossil Record

The immense happiness of people living isolated in nature suggests that humans are fundamentally designed to be hunter-gatherers, sharing the exact same DNA as ancestors from tens of thousands of years ago. While conventional history dictates that cities and civilization began roughly 10,000 years ago, emerging archaeological discoveries are shattering that timeline. A prime example is Göbekli Tepe in Turkey, an immense complex of giant stone columns with 3D animal carvings that is 11,800 years old. The site was discovered in the 1990s by a sheep herder who noticed a strange stone sticking out of the ground and kicked the dirt off with his boots. Mainstream archaeologists are notoriously hesitant to accept these findings because it threatens their established relevance and forces them to rewrite history, much like how the discovery of the Clovis point locked timeline data in place for decades.

This reveals a broader issue: entire sciences are being built upon incredibly incomplete data. The narrative used to look like a simple, logical evolution from *Homo erectus* to *Homo sapiens*, but science now proves that at least four or five humanoid species lived simultaneously, including the Denisovans and a large, big-headed species found in China. The reality is that making a fossil is incredibly rare; most bones decay completely within a century. When considering how many billions of dinosaurs existed over hundreds of millions of years compared to the tiny fraction of bones found, it becomes obvious that our understanding of Earth's history is incredibly limited.

* **Göbekli Tepe Age:** Datable to 11,800 years old and intentionally buried over 11,000 years ago. * **Humanoid Coexistence:** At least 5 distinct humanoid species are now known to have walked the Earth at the same time. * **Natural Decomposition:** Skeletal remains vanish rapidly in the woods because small animals, like mice, consume the bones for nutrients.

---

[01:45:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=6314s) The Dinosaur Tracks of Glen Rose and Ignorance of the Past

The discussion shifts to incredible tangible evidence of prehistory found right in Texas at Dinosaur Valley State Park in Glen Rose. The speakers look at images of massive, 113-million-year-old dinosaur tracks imprinted cleanly into the rock. The tracks were made when the ground was a soft mixture of mud and volcanic ash before hardening over millennia. These tracks were uniquely exposed after a severe drought caused the local river to dry up completely, uncovering footprints that belonged to two types of dinosaurs, including the *Acrocanthosaurus*.

The history of the park's discovery is equally fascinating, tracing back to 1908 when a local schoolboy first stumbled upon the tracks. Looking at an old photo of the massive three-toed tracks next to a man, the hosts laugh about how difficult it must have been for the boy to explain his discovery to his parents. In 1910, townsfolk likely didn't even have drawings of dinosaurs to reference, even though bones had begun to be unearthed in the 1800s. They chuckle at the irony that despite all this physical proof, "there's a lot of people today that don't even think dinosaurs are real, which is hilarious," proving that the internet is full of knuckleheads despite the overwhelming evidence left in stone.

* **Dinosaur Valley State Park:** Located in Glen Rose, Texas, featuring tracks that are 113 million years old. * **Species Identified:** Tracks are believed to belong to dinosaurs like the *Acrocanthosaurus*. * **Discovery History:** First discovered by a local schoolboy in 1908; heavily exposed during severe river droughts.

[01:48:39](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=6519s) Pushing Back Deep Time and the White Sands Footprints

The conversation opens with a reflection on how much of Earth's history has been completely erased by time. Vast numbers of living things simply died, were absorbed by the earth, "swallowed up," and destroyed by erosion without ever fossilizing. Because of this, humanity bases its entire geological and evolutionary history on a very limited pool of surviving information. Fascinatingly, this timeline never gets younger; as new discoveries are made, history is continually pushed further back. For instance, the discovery of modern human remains has pushed the human timeline back another 300,000 to 400,000 years. Similarly, the long-held theory that humans first crossed the Bering Land Bridge 12,000 to 14,000 years ago has been upended by discoveries pushing that date back by an additional 10,000 years.

A prime example discussed is the discovery of human footprints at White Sands, New Mexico, which have been dated to 22,000 years old. The speakers marvel at the fact that it took a massive flood to wash away layers of sediment and reveal these ancient tracks, explaining why the surrounding area remains so muddy. They note that while digging began later, the original discovery dates back to 1908, though prominent photographs were taken around 1952, suggesting subsequent flooding may have exposed even more over the decades.

[01:49:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=6594s) Unearthing Arrowheads and Ancient History

The dialogue naturally transitions from global geological timelines to personal experiences with history right beneath their feet. One speaker asks when dinosaurs were first scientifically understood, prompting a quick look-up that reveals the first recorded dinosaur bone was described in 1677, though people had dug them up for thousands of years prior thinking they belonged to giant humans. The focus then shifts to the speaker's upbringing on a ranch where Native American artifacts were incredibly common. Every single time it rained, the shifting soil would expose ancient arrowheads.

The speakers share a mutual enthrallment with holding these pieces of ancient history. One recounts a mule deer hunt in the high desert of Nevada, where he looked down and spotted a tiny "arrowette." Holding it, he couldn't help but feel a profound connection to "some dude" who shot at a deer hundreds or perhaps thousands of years ago. The ranch-owning speaker recalls his mother taking a collection of their found arrowheads to a museum in Fort Worth, where experts identified distinct styles and dated them between 2,200 and 4,000 years old. The speaker even presents a remarkably large point on set, which a friend found on his ranch. According to hunter Remy Warren, a head that large was likely used for fishing. Because ancient bows lacked immense power, a wide cut would fail to penetrate a large land animal's rib cage unless shot from point-blank range, meaning smaller heads were actually preferred for animals like buffalo to ensure deep penetration.

* **First scientific dinosaur bone record:** 1677, initially mistaken for a giant human bone. * **Artifact storage:** The speaker's mother kept a large wicker basket entirely filled with found arrowheads. * **The mystery of lost tools:** The speakers wonder how ancient people could lose so many arrowheads given the hours of labor required to flintnap them, concluding they must have been shooting constantly, with specialized arrow-makers—perhaps older tribe members who could no longer hunt—producing them daily in camp.

[01:54:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=6846s) The Brutal Reality of the Frontier and 1823

The conversation turns to the television series *1823* (likely referencing *1883*), which one speaker praises as one of the finest theatrical depictions of American westward migration ever produced, perfectly nailing the terror of civilized city dwellers confronting the raw, lawless wilderness. The creator explains that the realism was fueled by extensive research, including a stroke of personal luck: one side of his family had migrated from Kentucky to Texas in the 1840s, and his great-great-grandmother had kept a detailed journal.

Reading her journal and others from the era highlighted the extreme dangers of the trail. Chief among them was crossing rivers. "No one could swim," making river crossings absolute bottlenecks of terror. Many migrants were central Europeans—Germans and Croatians—who had been promised free land by European travel agencies. They arranged their entire journey, chipped in money for guides, wagons, and mules, and landed in ports like New Orleans or Galveston with absolutely no idea what awaited them. Most intended to head to Oregon because its climate mirrored central Europe, but many never made it past Texas towns like Waco or Fort Worth due to sun exposure, disease, bandits, and sheer exhaustion. By the 1880s, conflicts with Native American tribes had largely subsided, but lawlessness remained rampant. The speakers note that even today, with endless laws, bad people do awful things; on the frontier, with zero enforcement or help, malicious actors simply waited out in the open to ambush vulnerable travelers.

[01:57:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7057s) Lost in the Woods and the Counterclockwise Bias

A major hazard of the plains was navigating without an experienced guide. If travelers took a wrong turn, they would quickly run out of water or begin wandering in massive circles on the flat, featureless landscape. One speaker mentions a fascinating article stating that when humans get lost in the woods, they almost always walk in a counterclockwise direction, regardless of whether they are right-handed or left-handed. The article advised that if someone realizes they are lost and looping, they should intentionally veer to the right to counteract this natural bias.

Looking up the phenomenon on Perplexity, they discover that blindfolded experiments confirm humans cannot walk in a straight line without external landmarks like the sun or a distant mountain. Small, random errors in balance and internal body feedback accumulate over time, naturally bending the walking path into a closed loop. Furthermore, scientists studying social distancing during COVID-19 noticed that pedestrians everywhere exhibit an inherent, individual preference to move counterclockwise. The speakers reflect on how completely disheartening it must be to walk for days, only to pass the exact same dead tree and realize you have gone in a massive circle.

* **Navigation basics:** The ranch-raised speaker admits he never understood getting fully lost because basic woodsmanship—using a compass or tracking the sun's rise in the east to establish north, south, and west—keeps a person oriented. * **Panic in nature:** City dwellers with zero wilderness experience completely freak out when lost because they suddenly realize nature is entirely ambivalent to their survival. "Nature doesn't give a [__] if you make it," it is completely heartless and tests a person's core.

[02:01:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7300s) Eloquence of the Past vs. Modern Intellectual Laziness

The dialogue returns to the journals of the creator's great-great-grandmother. When asked if he would ever publish them online, he declines, noting that the journal itself was largely uneventful—filled with complaints about the cold, mundane dinners, rude companions, and the fear of river crossings, but featuring no dramatic bandit attacks. What truly stands out to him, however, is how spectacularly well-written and eloquent the entries are.

This triggers a shared admiration for historical literacy. The speakers note that Civil War-era letters and World War II love letters—such as the "magnificent," eloquent letters the guest possesses from his grandfather, a B-19 bomber pilot who enlisted in 1941—display a profound command of language that the average person today simply lacks. They lament the modern deterioration of self-expression. One speaker points out the ultimate irony of modern technology: if you told someone from the past that future humans would carry a pocket device that serves as a flashlight and instantly answers any question, they would assume we are an era of geniuses. Instead, people have become intellectually lazy because the machine does the learning. "You just get an answer that you didn't earn," the speaker concludes, noting that unearned knowledge, much like unearned equity, loses its fundamental value.

[02:04:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7464s) Correspondence Culture of the 1800s vs. Modern Writing

The conversation begins with a reflection on how people in the 1800s approached letter writing, noting that individuals often dedicated massive, uninterrupted blocks of one to three hours at a stretch to handle their correspondence. For those with heavy mail, this task could easily consume several hours of most days. The speakers liken this to a modern "email block," except it demanded a vastly superior and more significant chunk of daily energy. This sparks an exchange about the absolute cultural weight of the historical mail carrier, with the speakers marveling at how a single "dude on a horse with a bag of letters" meant absolutely everything to society.

They briefly debate the historical cost of postage, with one guessing it cost a quarter—noting that a quarter was a lot of money back then—while the other suggests it was likely much lower, perhaps down to a half-penny. The host then pivots the topic directly to the creative process of filmmaking and showrunning, asking the creator how much he enjoys writing historical period pieces versus modern, high-stakes political thrillers like *Lioness* or the oil-industry drama *Land Man*.

- In the 1800s, people regularly blocked out 1 to 3 hours at a time for letter writing, treating it as a standard daily or weekly chore. - The mailman was considered the ultimate lifeline of communication, relying entirely on horses and saddlebags to move information across the country.

[02:05:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7527s) Predictive Writing on Lioness and the Reality of Tradecraft

The creator admits he does not necessarily have a favorite style, but highlights the distinct, "wild" thrill of writing *Lioness*. He explains that he tries to mentally project future geopolitical shifts and fictionalize them before they happen. This predictive writing style came to a head in season two when he authored a plotline where cartels were officially designated as terrorist organizations. He jokingly recalls thinking, "this could be my 18-month cancel vacation coming," only for the exact scenario to happen in real life just weeks before the show aired, making him look "like a soothsayer." The speakers appreciate that the series is entirely apolitical, focusing strictly on the raw, practical tradecraft of espionage and how it intermingles with military intelligence.

The discussion shifts to the intense demands of tracking multiple historical eras, bringing up the series *1923* starring Harrison Ford. They discuss how fascinating the 1920s landscape of Montana was because it captured a society caught right on the boundary line of lawlessness and rapid modernization. It was an era where the Industrial Revolution brought washing machines, refrigerators, telephones, and electricity into existence, yet characters were still fundamentally traveling long distances on horseback.

- The creator manages to predict major real-world political moves 18 months in advance by trying to guess geopolitical trends before they happen. - *Lioness* focuses strictly on the tradecraft of espionage rather than picking a partisan political side. - Montana in the 1920s served as a unique backdrop where high-tech modern conveniences like refrigerators existed alongside standard horseback travel.

[02:07:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7643s) Dark Research and the Constant Eye of the CIA

The speakers share a laugh over the performance of Timothy Dalton, who played the "evil rich guy" in *1923*. They praise his ability to play a truly twisted, deeply unsettling creep, with the creator revealing that even his own wife gave him a suspicious "side eye" after watching some of the sadomasochistic, dark scenes. His wife openly questioned, "Bro, what are you thinking?" while watching, and the host agrees that some of those sequences were remarkably evil. The creator defends the darkness of the writing by noting that there are absolutely people that twisted in the real world.

This leads to a humorous but grounded realization about the creator's internet search history. Because he writes across so many intense genres, his computer history features a bizarre, simultaneous mix of search queries including "how to make a bomb," "SNM practice," and "CIA hot regions in the Middle East." He fully assumes that the CIA and FBI have a dedicated team keeping tabs on his phone, while the host laughs that intelligence analysts are likely looking at it and saying, "Taylor's writing something new." They reflect on the dark reality that prominent public figures are almost certainly subjected to constant, hidden digital surveillance, though ordinary citizens can only guess at the true scale of modern spying.

- Timothy Dalton, a former James Bond actor, played a deeply twisted villain in the series *1923*. - The creator's search history routinely flags extreme, high-risk topics like bomb-making parameters and Middle Eastern hot zones simultaneously. - The speakers assume that intelligence agencies track the search data of influential creators, recognizing it as script research after the fact.

[02:08:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7737s) Low-Tech Espionage and Long-Game Sabotage

When asked how difficult it is to accurately mirror modern espionage without making up fictional tools, the creator reveals that true tradecraft relies far less on sci-fi gadgets and far more on human psychology. While high-tech tools like satellite imagery, facial recognition, and tracking devices are in constant play, much of the most effective spying is intentionally low-tech so that it leaves no digital trace. The core of the "spy game" remains timeless: leverage, manipulation, bribing people with money, or controlling them through blackmail.

The conversation shifts to a striking real-world example of a masterful, long-game intelligence operation: the Mossad pager and cell phone operations. The host highlights the sheer patience required to execute a plot of that scale—building a fake dummy corporation, selling compromised communication devices to a targeted enemy, and waiting years before finally triggering them to detonate. The creator describes the discipline and risk management behind the operation as "insanity" and "shocking," clarifying that while they are not endorsing the violence, the sheer operational planning is staggering to analyze.

- Modern espionage prioritizes low-tech communication methods alongside high-tech tools because analog methods are significantly harder to trace. - The primary tools of global tradecraft remain human manipulation: financial bribery and personal blackmail. - The speakers dissect the Mossad pager operation as a prime example of extreme operational patience, requiring a dummy corporation to seed devices years before detonation.

[02:10:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7851s) The Realities of Special Operations and the Future of War

The creator notes that reality is often so wild that if he wrote it into a script, "no one would [__] buy it." He points out that real operations like the Maduro raid or even the Osama bin Laden raid—where a high-tech helicopter famously crashed—are messy. He expresses total amazement at the absolute precision of the raid on the Venezuelan military base in the middle of Caracas, where a strike force successfully invaded a sovereign base and withdrew without a single American casualty. When the host asks if he thinks the mission actually went less smoothly than the public was led to believe, the creator shares a line from his upcoming season of *Lioness*: "well, smooth as these things go." He notes that whenever you put heavily armed troops into helicopters, chaos is guaranteed, making a zero-casualty outcome genuinely groundbreaking.

Looking ahead, the creator warns that the entire landscape of human warfare is transitioning out of its infancy into a terrifying "adolescence." He states that the combination of artificial intelligence and automated drones is creating a brand-new style of conflict that will eventually mature into an absolute "beast." He describes modern drones the size of airplanes carrying devastating payloads, operated by a technician sitting comfortably inside a Conex shipping container in the Nevada desert—or worse, completely pre-programmed to fly, target, and execute missions autonomously without a human in the loop at all.

- Real-world military operations are notoriously messy; even successful high-profile raids routinely feature catastrophic gear failures like helicopter crashes. - A line in the upcoming season of *Lioness* addresses this reality: "well, smooth as these things go." - The creator views autonomous AI warfare and drone technology as an evolving "beast" capable of carrying out devastating aerial missions with zero direct human pilot intervention.

[02:13:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8025s) The Missing Scientists and Scriptwriter Logic

The conversation ventures into speculative territory as the host suggests that mysterious Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) sightings are likely military tests involving novel propulsion systems, noting that anti-gravity research has been quietly underway since the 1950s and 1960s. He points to insights from mathematical physicist Eric Weinstein, who highlighted a university in upstate New York featuring a bizarrely overqualified physics department intimately tied to a hedge fund pulling financial numbers larger than Bernie Madoff. The creator agrees completely that deep black-budget, top-secret access programs are actively operating out of sight.

The host then brings up a deeply unsettling true-crime pattern: the high number of elite defense and energy scientists who have gone missing or turned up dead over a short window of time. He notes that around 15 prominent scientists from sensitive areas like Los Alamos disappeared or died under highly suspicious circumstances over the course of a few years. Their specific fields of study were incredibly niche, including spacecraft metallurgy and cold fusion. The speakers debate whether these scientists were targeted by foreign adversaries like China, Russia, or Iran, or if they were silenced domestically because their breakthroughs threatened to make conventional, billion-dollar energy systems entirely obsolete.

The segment wraps up with the host detailing one particularly eerie case of a female metallurgy scientist who vanished in a 30-second window while hiking directly behind a friend. Despite search parties and cadaver dogs scouring the area, she vanished completely without a trace, though reports suggest a body may have finally been recovered. Using pure Hollywood scriptwriter logic, the creator jokes that investigators should look directly at the hiking companion: "Hey, so me and Joe went for a hike. I turned around. That fucker's gone... No sign of struggle. It's weird."

- Eric Weinstein has publicly flagged an upstate New York university physics department for its anomalous connections to an incredibly high-performing hedge fund. - Roughly 15 specialized scientists working out of hubs like Los Alamos died or vanished over a short period, sparking a Justice Department investigation into potential patterns. - The missing scientists were specialists in highly disruptive fields like cold fusion and advanced spacecraft metallurgy. - The creator jokingly notes that as a screenwriter, a story about a hiker vanishing in a 30-second window with "no sign of struggle" immediately makes the surviving friend the prime suspect.

[02:19:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8383s) Bizarre Accidents and Celebrity Mysteries

The conversation begins with a casual back-and-forth about suspicious deaths and accidents. The speakers joke about how law enforcement reacts when a spouse falls off a cliff during a hike, immediately demanding to check text messages to see if the couple had been arguing. They mention a recent, strange incident out in the Bahamas where a woman fell off a sailboat, noting that investigators are "not buying it." This prompts a trip down memory lane to the classic Hollywood mystery of Natalie Wood, who drowned while on a boat with Christopher Walken and her husband, Robert Wagner, following what was reportedly a massive fight.

[02:20:38](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8438s) The Missing Scientists and Covert Operatives

The discussion shifts to a series of mysterious disappearances involving scientists. They recount the case of an administrative assistant who went missing for a year, though they cannot recall her exact specialty. More specifically, they highlight a woman named Reza, who served as a director at the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) within the materials processing group. Reza specialized in burn-resistant, high-strength metal alloys and rocket propulsion metals. She vanished while hiking in the Angeles National Forest just outside of Pasadena, California. While one speaker notes that she could have realistically just been attacked by a mountain lion, another counters with the more conspiratorial possibility that someone working on top-secret rocket propulsion metals might have been deemed "a problem" and neutralized.

- **Reza:** Former director at NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, specializing in high-strength, burn-resistant metal alloys for rocket propulsion. - **Disappearance Location:** Angeles National Forest, outside of Pasadena, California.

[02:22:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8523s) Sleeper Cells and Secret Biolabs on American Soil

The speakers pivot to foreign espionage, starting with a mention of the former mayor of Arcadia, California, who was discovered to be a Chinese spy. They marvel at the long-game strategy required for foreign governments to groom a young asset, run them for local mayor, and potentially push them toward state representative, Congress, or even the presidency. They recall ABSCAM from the 1970s, where several American politicians and congressmen were caught on the take or acting as Soviet spies. This reminds them of the television show *The Americans*, which accurately depicted the reality of Russian sleeper-cell agents pretending to be normal American families—a tactic they agree is still actively used today by both Russia and China, alongside Israeli agents infiltrating groups like Hezbollah, Hamas, and the IRGC.

The conversation then turns to the topic of unmonitored biological laboratories operating secretly within the United States. They reference a shocking case where a Chinese citizen named David He faced federal charges related to manufacturing misbranded medical devices. This links to a larger raid in Las Vegas involving an unpermitted laboratory run out of a private residence that was also being used as an unlicensed short-term rental. Inside, investigators discovered refrigerators packed with 1,200 samples of liquids and vials explicitly labeled as dengue fever, HIV, and malaria, alongside approximately a thousand mice. The speakers express utter disbelief that the CDC and federal government never actually tested the liquids, choosing to rely entirely on the container labels before allowing a man named Ory Solomon, who owned the lab, to essentially walk free.

- **ABSCAM:** A 1970s FBI sting operation that exposed widespread corruption and foreign influence among US politicians. - **Las Vegas Biolab Raid:** Discovered 1,200 pathogen samples (labeled HIV, dengue fever, malaria) and 1,000 mice inside a garage/short-term rental. - **Ory Solomon:** The individual associated with the Vegas lab who ultimately only faced minor firearms charges due to his immigration status.

[02:27:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8866s) The News Flood and a Prison Travel Guide

Reflecting on the sheer volume of alarming news, the speakers lament how disheartening the modern world can be. They observe that because of social media and the internet, secrets are constantly getting out, but the sheer volume of information acts as a "sensory overload" that numbs the public. In the 1990s, a Chinese or Israeli spy ring would dominate programs like *Nightline* or *Meet the Press* for weeks. Today, a massive bio-agent scandal is dropped into the public eye like a "rose petal in the river while a flood is going by"—quickly washed away and ignored by a public that would rather just tune it out and watch sports.

Looking for a lighter topic, one of the speakers brings up his newly authored book, expressing playful annoyance that the publisher, Simon & Schuster, failed to send the host a copy. The host asks how he found the time to write a book while managing 150 different television shows, and the author reveals the title: *How to Not Die in Prison*. He explains that the book was born out of a real-life encounter from his days living in Los Angeles. He used to work out at a gym on Beverly Boulevard nicknamed "Buns on Beverly" because passing traffic could look directly in at the treadmills. It was there that he met a phenomenally "yolked" man covered in tattoos named Tom Nelson.

- **Media Environment:** The speakers compare the modern news cycle to a roaring flood where massive geopolitical scandals vanish instantly. - **Book Title:** *How to Not Die in Prison*, published by Simon & Schuster.

[02:31:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=9066s) From Hollywood Felon to COVID Lifeline

The author details how he and Tom Nelson eventually became lunch buddies, leading Tom to reveal his wild past. Tom had spent 17 years in prison after being a major Hollywood drug dealer, pulling armed robberies, and even running over a DEA agent. While incarcerated, Tom fell in love with fitness, and upon his release, he successfully built the largest independent private training gym in Hollywood. Years later, while the author was stuck filming *Yellowstone* on a ranch in Montana during the COVID-19 pandemic, he called Tom to buy gym equipment because all commercial facilities were locked down. Tom sold him the gear from his own newly shuttered gym, and the two temporarily lost touch.

[02:33:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=9185s) Concept for the Accidental Inmate

About 18 to 24 months ago, Tom reached out in desperation. He was a 60-year-old felon and a single father to a 5-year-old daughter, struggling to find work, and had just been mistakenly diagnosed with colon cancer based on a questionable X-ray. The author stepped in, flying Tom to Texas to see specialized doctors who performed a successful surgery and confirmed the mass was not cancerous. When Tom asked for a short-term financial loan to get back on his feet, the author refused, stating he had a "100% failure rate of loaning money to friends." Instead, he came up with a professional solution to help Tom monetize his life experience.

Realizing that no one had ever written a practical travel guide for incarceration, the author pitched the idea to Tom: "We're going to write a travel guide to prison for the accidental inmate". To give Tom a template, the author mailed him a stack of Lonely Planet travel guides for Thailand and Mexico. He explained that the book should mimic that exact format—breaking down the foreign territory with an overview of the environment, a glossary of local slang, an analysis of the food, and instructions on how to navigate the native culture safely.

[02:35:20](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=9320s) A Travel Guide to Prison

The speaker shares an unconventional literary project: a literal "tour guide to prison" co-written with a formerly incarcerated man named Tom. Conceived like a traditional travel guide that tells you where to stay and how to navigate a country, this book explores the grim realities of serving time. The speaker handled the structure and introductions while mapping out chapters that cover everything from day one processing and yard navigation to commissary food, gangs, diseases, riots, getting a prison job, and even "how to [__] make a shiv." When pitched with just three completed chapters, Simon & Schuster flipped over the concept, earning the duo a book deal that provided Tom with the financial stability to stay home and care for his kid.

The hosts share a laugh over the sobering nature of the book, with the speaker noting that 99% of readers will simply conclude they never want to go to prison. The introduction includes a strict warning: "if you're buying this book because you're going to prison, finish the book before you get to prison. Do not bring this book with you to prison or you'll die on [__] day one. Leave the book at home." Despite the dark subject matter, the speaker found writing the book to be an entertaining diversion from the stresses of his television day job, noting that complaining about production delays on a show like *Land Man* feels trivial when you spend your afternoon writing about smallpox outbreaks in correctional facilities.

- **Publisher:** Simon & Schuster - **Length:** A couple hundred pages - **Content Highlights:** Day one processing, yard navigation, food, commissary, gangs, diseases, riots, jobs, and weapon fabrication.

[02:37:33](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=9453s) The Broken Prison System

The conversation shifts to a serious critique of the American penal system, which both speakers agree is fundamentally broken and "heartbreaking." One speaker recalls living with an editor who worked on the documentary series *Locked Up*, filming inside notorious facilities like Folsom and Corcoran. They argue that the current system is completely devoid of true rehabilitation efforts, operating instead as an institution that virtually guarantees a person will emerge as a hardened criminal.

- **Recidivism Rate:** The speakers note that the US recidivism rate sits at "80 something percent," giving individuals who leave prison a discouraging four-to-one odds against successfully staying out. - **Referenced Locations:** Folsom State Prison, Corcoran State Prison, and the "Alabama Solution" documentary context.

[02:39:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=9551s) Justin Gaethje and UFC 250

As the podcast winds down, the hosts pivot to sports, eagerly discussing the "surreal" atmosphere of UFC 250 and Justin Gaethje's incredible underdog performance. The speaker recalls bumping into his co-host at a fight in Las Vegas, remembering it as the first time he saw Gaethje strike live. Despite Gaethje starting out as a Division I All-American wrestler, his striking level is so elite that he could have easily been a professional boxer. The hosts marvel at how his specific brand of relentless aggression is perfectly tailored for MMA, calling him a "wild [__]" and a "beast."

The fight itself was a brutal, tactical war against Ilia Topuria. While some betting books labeled Gaethje as a six-to-one underdog, he completely defied the odds. Topuria put Gaethje in immense trouble during a punishing second round by relentlessly destroying his liver, nearly putting him down. However, Gaethje's durability and cleverness allowed him to roll with the shots and return devastating damage. Reports later indicated that Topuria suffered two broken orbital bones and a broken nose from the encounter, whereas Gaethje looked perfectly fine just a few days later. The speaker emphasizes how Gaethje utilizes a signature "collar tie into an uppercut" to find openings with incredibly heavy hands, a trait even the legendary Khabib Nurmagomedov verified by stating Gaethje hit him harder than anyone else in his career.

- **Betting Odds:** Gaethje was listed as high as a 6-to-1 underdog on some sportsbooks. - **Injuries Sustained:** Reports indicated Topuria suffered a broken nose and two broken orbital bones. - **Venue Atmosphere:** The event featured an incredible live flyover with eight military jets flying tightly together. - **The Book:** *How to Not Die in Prison*, available now in print and audiobook format.

## Notable quotes > [02:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=144s) world... of balls and geometry — Joe Rogan

> [26:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1575s) How the [ __ ] do you pay attention to everything? You're running a gigantic ranch and you have about 48 TV shows. — Joe Rogan

> [32:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1968s) basically I want to take your character from Bad Santa and put him in West Texas and run an oil company.

> [01:03:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=3810s) the fight's over. It's a [___] lab leak.

> [01:10:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=4200s) I almost don't want to talk about it because I don't want to get killed. It's that bad. — Elon Musk

> [01:14:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=4480s) CEO of a state. — Steve Bullock

> [01:34:31](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5671s) do a thing to completion

> [02:01:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7300s) You just get an answer that you didn't earn

> [02:29:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8946s) 100% failure rate of loaning money to friends — Taylor Sheridan

> [02:29:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8946s) We're going to write a travel guide to prison for the accidental inmate — Taylor Sheridan

> [02:29:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8985s) if you're buying this book because you're going to prison, finish the book before you get to prison. Do not bring this book with you to prison or you'll die on [__] day one. Leave the book at home. — Taylor Sheridan

## Mentioned Joe Rogan, Maverick Buzz the Tower, Futurity, Spook's Got a Whiz, Shane Van Boning, Earl Strickland, Rockefellers, Ritalin, Yuri Bezmanov, Gavin Newsom, Mickelson, Kevin Costner, The Joe Rogan Experience, Duncan, Kellogg's, Harris Ranch, Four Sixes (6666) Ranch, Yellowstone, Texas Tech, TCU, Texas A&M, Colorado State University, Wind River, Ben Richardson, Mayor of Kingstown, 1883, 1923, Special Ops: Lioness, Landman, Billy Bob Thornton, Bad Santa, Nicolás Maduro, Donald Trump, New York Post, Vlad the Impaler, Dracula, Ayn Rand, Emperor Hirohito, Nancy Pelosi, Visa, Ro Khanna, CNN, Jack Kemp, Dan Rather, Tulsi Gabbard, Anthony Fauci, EcoHealth Alliance, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Jerusalem Post, Money Control, Newsweek, Biden administration, Rand Paul, Jon Stewart, The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, Stephen Colbert, Ivermectin, CDC, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., The Real Anthony Fauci, Dallas Buyers Club, AZT, Kary Mullis, Kamala Harris, Joy Reid, MSNBC, Nick Shirley, Tim Walz, Elon Musk, Department of Government Efficiency, Barack Obama, Steve Bullock, Triggered, The Fillmore, Regenokine, Dr. Peter Weiling, Kobe Bryant, Peyton Manning, Dana White, Teeter, Ways to Well, Cellular Performance Institute, Shane Dorian, Painkiller, Peter Berg, Matthew Broderick, Sackler family, OxyContin, Ibogaine, Rick Perry, Brian Huard, Marcus Latrell, Lone Survivor, Sean Ryan, Dakota Meyer, Taylor Sheridan, Tom Nelson, How Not to Die in Prison: A Survival Guide, The Madison, Sicario, Hell or High Water, Werner Herzog, Happy People: A Year in the Taiga, Dick Proenneke, Lake Clark National Park, Twin Lakes, Alaska, Heimo Korth, Edna Korth, Vice Guide to Travel, Heimo's Arctic Refuge, The Last Alaskans, Göbekli Tepe, Turkey, Denisovans, Dinosaur Valley State Park, Glen Rose, Texas, Acrocanthosaurus, White Sands, New Mexico, Bering Land Bridge, Remy Warren, Fort Worth, 1823, Waco, Perplexity, Harrison Ford, Montana, Timothy Dalton, CIA, FBI, Mossad, Maduro raid, Osama bin Laden raid, Caracas, Eric Weinstein, Bernie Madoff, Los Alamos, Justice Department, Natalie Wood, Christopher Walken, Robert Wagner, Reza, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, JPL, Angeles National Forest, Pasadena, Arcadia, ABSCAM, The Americans, Hezbollah, Hamas, IRGC, David He, Las Vegas, Ory Solomon, Nightline, Meet the Press, Simon & Schuster, Buns on Beverly, DEA, Lonely Planet, Thailand, Mexico, Locked Up, Folsom State Prison, Corcoran State Prison, UFC 250, Justin Gaethje, Ilia Topuria, Khabib Nurmagomedov

[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4)

中文简报

泰勒·谢里丹痛批联邦欺诈，指责官僚导致城市衰败这位好莱坞主创认为，制度化的体制性腐败和高利润的流浪汉产业正主动让美国各大城市的危机持续存在，以此保护官僚机构的资金来源。泰勒·谢里丹（Taylor Sheridan）做客乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）节目，讨论了马匹育种遗传学、对公共教育体系的批评，以及纯素农业种植对生态造成的严重影响。对话涵盖了政府体制性欺诈、加利福尼亚州不断发展的无家可归者产业，以及Regenokine和Ibogaine等前沿替代医疗手段。谢里丹还分享了他打造《黄石》（Yellowstone）与《土地人》（Landman）等剧集的幕后制作见解，探讨了低技术间谍活动，谈及国防科学家可疑失踪事件，并详细讲述了他全新监狱生存指南的由来。现代公共教育体系的框架最初由洛克菲勒家族奠定，旨在将儿童塑造成顺从的工人和士兵，而非培养独立思考能力。 (5:28) 加利福尼亚州在应对无家可归问题上耗资240亿美元却缺乏审计与透明度，非营利机构因依赖资金维持运作而缺乏彻底解决危机的内在动力。 (9:01) 牛油果与扁桃仁等纯素主要作物带来显著的生态代价，不仅生产单颗扁桃仁需消耗约19加仑水，每年更有数十亿只用于授粉的蜜蜂因此死亡。 (17:04) 泰勒·谢里丹（Taylor Sheridan）依托自《猎凶风河谷》（Wind River）合作至今的精简核心班底，将影视剧筹备周期从标准的12周压缩至4周，有效绕过了好莱坞冗长的官僚审核。 (26:15) 美国特种部队在针对委内瑞拉总统尼古拉斯·马杜罗（Nicolás Maduro）的抓捕行动中，据称使用了名为“混乱制造者”的机密低频声波武器系统，使安保人员和雷达设备瘫痪。 (35:18)

Reading summary

Filmmaker Taylor Sheridan and host Joe Rogan argue that centralized government bureaucracies, corporate monopolies, and conventional institutions foster inefficiency and moral failure, contrasting them with the functional competence of ground-level tradecraft, ranching, and self-reliance. Ranching Economics and the Disciplines of Self-Reliance (26:15) Sheridan contrasts corporate consolidation with the lean, autonomous management of traditional American ranching. Using Texas's 300,000-acre Four Sixes (6666) Ranch as a primary model, he describes how a team of just 12 cowboys—most holding university degrees in ranch management—oversees independent regional camps spanning 35,000 to 50,000 acres each with minimal supervisory oversight. The speakers observe that this rigorous self-sufficiency mirrors extreme lifestyles of solitude, such as indigenous Siberian trappers documented by Werner Herzog or Alaskan survivalist Dick Proenneke, who lived isolated for over three decades. On a commercial scale, the speakers note that while four major meatpacking corporations historically controlled over 90% of the American beef market, supply chain disruptions during COVID-19 allowed independent ranchers to establish smaller, USDA-approved processing facilities handling roughly 50 head of cattle per hour rather than 800. They argue that grazing livestock remains ecologically necessary for untillable native pastures, contrasting regenerative grazing models with proposed political initiatives—such as an Oregon ballot measure seeking to outlaw livestock slaughter—which they contend ignore the ecological reality of managing 91 million domestic cattle. Institutional Dysfunction, Regulatory Capture, and Broken Precedents (9:01) The discussion levels heavy criticism at the modern non-profit sector and state governance, highlighting what the speakers term the 'homeless industrial complex' in California. They argue that non-governmental organizations face a perverse economic incentive: solving crises would eliminate the executive salaries and administrative funding sustaining them. Rogan emphasizes that California expended $24 billion on homelessness initiatives with negligible oversight, pointing to Governor Gavin Newsom's veto of a legislative spending audit as evidence of institutional unaccountability. Broadening the critique to national governance, both speakers warn that hyper-partisan executive actions create dangerous legal precedents. They cite how aggressive tactics—such as masked federal ICE agents detaining individuals without visible identification—inevitably establish standard operating procedures that subsequent administrations weaponize against opposing political factions. To mitigate systemic political entrenchment and self-enrichment, they propose capping legislative service at 12 years each in the House and Senate, pointing to congressional figures who accumulate vast wealth through initial public offerings while drawing modest public salaries. Covert Tradecraft, Advanced Defense Programs, and Unconventional Warfare (35:18) Drawing from research for his espionage series Lioness, Sheridan asserts that effective intelligence gathering relies far more on timeless psychological manipulation, blackmail, and low-tech analog methods than on high-tech gadgets, because analog approaches leave fewer digital signatures. The speakers examine operations such as coordinated remote detonations of communication devices and a covert U.S. Special Forces extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, which Sheridan claims utilized low-frequency sonic weaponry to incapacitate perimeter guards without American casualties. Looking toward future conflicts, Sheridan warns that warfare is entering a volatile transition driven by automated artificial intelligence and large-scale armed drones operated remotely from shipping containers. Discussing classified military research, the speakers express skepticism toward official narratives regarding Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, suggesting sightings frequently represent black-budget Special Access Programs testing proprietary propulsion. Rogan further cites the suspicious disappearances and deaths of roughly 15 niche defense and metallurgy scientists—including NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory director Reza—speculating that breakthroughs in advanced energy or novel materials are aggressively suppressed by domestic or foreign interests. Addiction Treatment, Regenerative Therapies, and Penal Reform (84:04) Addressing public health failures, the speakers condemn pharmaceutical manufacturers for initiating the opioid crisis through aggressive painkiller distribution, creating a pathway to lethal illicit fentanyl use. They criticize progressive harm reduction programs that distribute paraphernalia without mandatory rehabilitation. Instead, they champion alternative psychedelic treatments like Ibogaine, highlighting advocacy by former Texas Governor Rick Perry. Perry reportedly documented a 25% reduction in personal age-related brain atrophy on medical scans following treatment, while multiple combat veterans experienced abrupt cessation of severe trauma and alcoholism after clinic visits in Mexico. Similar critiques extend to the American correctional system, which the speakers argue guarantees institutionalization, citing an estimated national recidivism rate above 80%. Sheridan details assisting former felon Tom Nelson—who served 17 years before opening an independent Hollywood fitness facility—by financing medical care and commissioning him to author a pragmatic 'prison travel guide' formatted after commercial international travel handbooks, aiming to provide practical navigation and survival advice for first-time inmates. The dialogue presents a worldview prioritizing decentralized competence, physical resilience, and unconventional therapies over institutional authority. However, many key assertions—including the operational mechanics of classified sonic extractions, the timeline of corporate energy suppression, and medical claims regarding Ibogaine-induced brain regeneration—rely on anecdotal testimony and speculative claims that lack formal documentation or external verification.

精炼阅读摘要

影视主创泰勒·谢里丹（Taylor Sheridan）与主持人乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）在对话中探讨了美国社会深层的制度失灵与现实脱节，指出极端农业与能源诉求脱离了物质常识，而官僚寻租与非营利机构更导致危机长期化。对话同时审视了阿片类药物泛滥下的替代医疗前景，以及由低技术谍报、人工智能无人机和黑预算技术交织而成的现代地缘暗战。农业与能源现实对抗意识形态空想 (12:47) 对谈者批评当代诸多激进政策缺乏基本后勤考量，仅凭道德情绪驱动。以俄勒冈州一项拟禁止所有狩猎、放牧及商业牲畜屠宰的选民提案为例，谢里丹指出美国约有9100万头牛，一旦法律禁止圈养和屠宰，牧民将放弃管理，无序繁衍不仅会导致30年内种群膨胀至9亿头，更会引发严重的生态破坏与公共安全灾难。同时，流行纯素食品同样伴随高昂环境代价：加利福尼亚生产一颗扁桃仁需消耗约19加仑水，而鳄梨产业每年导致数十亿授粉蜜蜂死亡。就肉类产业链而言，长期掌控90%以上份额的四大加工厂模式低效，反而是新冠疫情促成了每小时屠宰50头的中小型本地屠宰场崛起，使肉类供应更为分散可控。在能源领域，对话强调现代文明对石油的绝对依赖短期内无法被替代。尽管各界将冷聚变视作理想清洁能源，但工程师和气候学家普遍预计其商业可靠应用仍需30至40年；而设想中如“咖啡壶大小”的家用微型核反应堆更面临致命的人性短板——在普通人仍会把金属放进微波炉的文明阶段，个人根本不具备安全掌控核能的技术认知与审慎态度。制度性寻租与公权扩张的先例风险 (9:01) 对话深度抨击了加州及洛杉矶的“无家可归工业复合体”（Homeless Industrial Complex）。对谈者指出，现代非营利组织普遍异化为高额行政开支驱动的自利实体，当机构彻底解决某一社会问题时其经费便会归零，这种逆向激励导致危机被持续放大。罗根指出加利福尼亚州在无家可归问题上耗资240亿美元却缺乏审计，州长甚至直接否决了相关审计法案。民间调查更揭露大量空置日托中心违规领取数百万美元补贴等普遍欺诈行为。针对政治体制，两人主张对国会参众两院设立最多12年的严格任期限制，遏制职业政客通过立法权力在企业首次公开募股（IPO）中中饱私囊的现象。对谈者同时警示司法与行政权力的“滑坡效应”：一届政府创设的强制先例必然会被后继政党武器化。例如执法部门在街头部署缺乏标识、仅受训7周的蒙面武装人员快速逮捕移民的激进做法，直接为疫情期间动用国民警卫队实施严苛管控提供了制度借口；公共卫生领域亦沿袭旧例，福奇（Anthony Fauci）在新冠溯源、PCR检测适用性评估及历史上的艾滋病AZT药物推广中均展现出官僚体系规避问责的惯性行为。药物危机治理与伊博格碱疗法潜力 (84:04) 对谈者严厉谴责萨克勒家族（Sackler Family）及医药集团过度开销奥施康定（OxyContin），指责其企业贪婪直接引爆了以微克致死的芬太尼危机。他们将进步派现行的“减害计划”斥为虚伪与残忍，认为向街头成瘾者发放免费手机与洁净注射器无异于任由其自生自灭，真正的关怀必须依托封闭性戒断机构实施强制干预。在替代治疗手段方面，对话着重探讨了源自西非的天然致幻剂伊博格碱（Ibogaine）。前得克萨斯州州长里克·佩里（Rick Perry）将其列为退伍军人创伤后应激障碍（PTSD）与成瘾救治的核心推动项目。据称佩里本人在接受治疗后，因年龄引起的脑萎缩在数月内得以显著逆转，多位特种作战老兵亦借此实现心理重构与完全戒断。此外，对话倡导采用自体血液离心浓缩注射与日常脊柱物理减压设备（如倒挂拉伸装置），以替代会切除椎间盘组织的破坏性外科切开手术。地缘暗战、隐秘技术与未来战争形态 (35:18) 在地缘战略层面，对话强调了掌控全球40%石油运量的霍尔木兹海峡对制衡大国竞争的枢纽价值。谢里丹透露了一起极具电影感的特种作战：美军精锐小队降落委内瑞拉首都高层建筑，据称利用先进低频声波武器瘫痪古巴安保部队，成功抓捕总统马杜罗（Nicolás Maduro）夫妇并零伤亡撤出。在日常间谍领域，尽管高空卫星与面部识别技术普及，但最有效的渗透与长线破坏依然依赖难以数字化追踪的低技术手段，如金钱收买、人性操控及潜伏多年的供应链破坏（如寻呼机长线爆炸行动）。针对未来战争，谢里丹警告人工智能与自动化无人机的结合正推动武装冲突演变为失控的“战争巨兽”，未来交战将由深居后方的技术员远程操控飞机级巡航机群完成。对话最后探讨了深层黑预算项目与尖端物理技术的关联：近年来洛斯阿拉莫斯等绝密部门约15名从事航天冶金与冷聚变的前沿科学家蹊跷失踪或死亡（包括NASA喷气推进实验室的材料主管Reza），同时美国本土多处出现未经报备的私人生物实验室（如拉斯维加斯查获藏有上千种登革热、HIV及病毒样本的非法民宅），凸显出隐蔽技术竞争与安全漏洞的严峻现状。该对话贯穿了强烈的反建制与重实效视角，强调脱离生态与物理常理的激进空想无法解决能源与民生问题，而封闭的官僚体制与非营利机构更倾向于维系危机而非解决问题。从前沿军事科技的隐蔽演进到退伍军人依靠冷门生化疗法自救，对谈者主张必须击碎意识形态话语的遮蔽，依托务实常识、制度性问责与跨学科探索来应对日益复杂的系统性危机。

Detailed notes — zh

## Background 本期节目由知名播客频道 PowerfulJRE 于 2026 年 6 月 23 日发布在 YouTube 平台上。节目嘉宾为著名编剧、导演兼制片人泰勒·谢里丹（Taylor Sheridan），视频简介重点介绍了其代表作《黄石》《边境杀手》《石油人》等影视剧、其牧场主与餐饮业者身份，以及他与前服刑人员汤姆·纳尔逊（Tom Nelson）合著的新书《如何在监狱里活下来：生存指南》。 ## TL;DR 泰勒·谢里丹与乔·罗根深入探讨了现代都市异化与荒野体力劳动的救赎力量，分析了《黄石》与《1883》等作品背后的历史考据与边疆精神。两人纵论人类起源、考古学范式困境、高科技自主战争及摩萨德谍报行动，并痛批当下虚伪的非营利流浪汉产业与失效的美国惩教体系。谢里丹还深情讲述了他为帮助患病落魄好友脱困，以“授人以渔”的原则合写硬核幽默监狱生存指南的温情始末。 ## Atmosphere & style 对话氛围硬朗干练且极具德州粗犷质感，两人如老友围炉畅谈般坦率切磋，在荒野求生、历史谜题与好莱坞创作间自如切换。叙事既有对现代科技伦理与官僚虚伪的辛辣讽刺，又穿插着极具画面感的荒野传奇与冷峻幽默，在硬汉哲学的碰撞中自然流淌出对尊严、真诚与兄弟情谊的深沉关怀。 ## Bulletin - [02:29:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8946s) 泰勒·谢里丹携手刑满释放的前毒贩汤姆·纳尔逊合著新书《如何在监狱里活下来》，以实用生存指南形式帮助初次入狱者自保，同时揭露美国惩教体系高达80%以上再犯率的制度性崩坏。 - [02:08:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7688s) 现代军事与情报对抗步入技术代差新阶段：摩萨德通过空壳公司历经数年渗透寻呼机供应链实施打击，而搭载AI算法的自主军用无人机正将战争推向失控边缘。 - [01:41:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=6106s) 土耳其哥贝克力石阵（距今约1.18万年）与新墨西哥白沙国家公园人类足迹（距今2.2万年）等重大考古发现，正在持续打破“克洛维斯第一”及农耕文明先于大型宗教建筑的传统学术范式。 - [01:30:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5424s) 洛杉矶等城市的流浪汉危机沦为“表演型创业者”获取丰厚薪酬与公帑的温床，非营利组织倾向于维持现状而非根治问题，以确保庞大资金链不断流。 ## Key takeaways - [01:30:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5424s) 城市流浪汉救助产业被部分非营利机构高管当成商业谋利手段，通过发放物资维持现状骗取巨额预算，本质上缺乏根除社会问题的动力。 - [01:31:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5512s) 《黄石》系列引发广泛社会共鸣，核心在于当代大众厌倦了政客口水仗与城市异化，对尊重自然、崇尚艰苦体力劳动的传统生活方式产生精神向往。 - [01:33:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5591s) 赫尔佐格纪录片与极地荒野独居者的真实生活表明，亲历亲为的体力劳作与脱离现代消费主义的生活方式能让人免受现代心理疾病的困扰。 - [01:41:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=6106s) 距今约11,800年的土耳其哥贝克力石阵表明，大型宗教建筑与复杂社会组织的出现可能早于农业定居，颠覆了传统考古学假设。 - [01:42:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=6162s) 主流考古界长期受制于“克洛维斯第一”等固有学术范式，但摩洛哥早期智人化石与北美白沙古人类足迹不断推前了人类演化与迁徙的时间线。 - [01:49:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=6594s) 德州牧场出土的古印第安石镞证明数千年前的北美原住民已有成熟的工具形态细分，且部族内部可能已建立起专门的手工业分工体系。 - [01:54:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=6846s) 剧集《1883》揭示了19世纪中叶西进迁徙的血腥真相：大部分来自中欧的移民缺乏野外生存技能，渡河溺水、霍乱及荒原匪帮构成了致命威胁。 - [01:57:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7057s) 人类在荒野迷路且缺乏外部地标参照时通常会呈逆时针打转，这一现象源于双腿微小平衡偏差累积及个体固有的生物力学特征。 - [02:01:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7274s) 19世纪拓荒者在极度艰苦的环境中仍保有优美典雅的书信文笔，相比之下，现代人因过度依赖智能设备与即时答案导致表达能力退化。 - [02:08:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7688s) 摩萨德策划的寻呼机爆炸事件揭示了顶级谍报策略：设立空壳公司进行多年长线布局并渗透供应链，利用低科技设备规避数字化反侦察。 - [02:10:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7843s) 军用无人机结合AI已具备跨洲航程与全自主打击能力，技术代差使现实军事行动的伤亡不对等急剧扩大，战争正向自动化杀戮演变。 - [02:13:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8025s) 多名涉密顶尖科学家的离奇失踪或非正常死亡，结合反重力技术的研发传闻，加剧了外界对未公开特设访问项目（SAP）的猜测与质疑。 - [02:19:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8377s) 拉斯维加斯无牌短租房查获包含致命病毒试剂的非法生物实验室，涉案人员却轻易免受重罪起诉，反映出公众与监管在资讯过载下的集体麻木。 - [02:29:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8946s) 谢里丹坚持“不直接借钱给朋友”的原则，选择通过传授写作技能并合著监狱指南的方式，为出狱后陷入生计绝境的前罪犯纳尔逊提供长期谋生之道。 - [02:37:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=9420s) 美国惩教系统再犯率超过80%，刑满释放人员回归社会面临严重的系统性壁垒，惩教机构已基本丧失原本的感化与再社会化职能。 - [02:39:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=9551s) UFC名将贾斯汀·盖奇在1赔6的极端不利赔率下顶住爆肝重击，凭借扎实的全美摔跤底蕴与精准的单手箍颈接上勾拳技术完成史诗级逆转。 ## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1s) 冠军皮带扣与马术知识体系节目开场，乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）立刻注意到了泰勒·谢里丹（Taylor Sheridan）身上极为吸睛的大皮带扣，直呼这块皮带扣太霸气了。谢里丹解释说，这块皮带扣是他的一匹名叫“Maverick Buzz the Tower”的赛马在年轻马大赛（Futurity）中赢得储备冠军（Reserve Champion）时获得的荣誉，比赛胜出者不仅能拿到丰厚的奖金，还会被授予象征荣誉的定制皮带扣。罗根感慨道，对于真正懂马的圈内人来说，只要瞥一眼皮带扣，就能立刻辨认出背后的含金量，甚至精准说出是哪一年的哪一匹名驹。罗根将这种现象与格斗圈做类比：拳迷看到某场比赛的记录，就能如数家珍地背出某位拳手在2012年击败了谁。马术世界同样拥有庞大且深奥的知识体系，外行人看马觉得大同小异，但真正深入钻研的人则对马匹的血统谱系、遗传特征以及后代继承的独特习性了如指掌。优良的运动天赋与神经特质代代相传，构成了一套复杂迷人的专业领域。 ### [01:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=87s) 名驹“Spooks Gotta Whiz”与马匹的怪癖和生理缺陷谢里丹谈到自己非常钟爱的一匹传奇公马“Spooks Gotta Whiz”（著名截牛/慢步滑停雷宁马种公马），他名下拥有多匹该种公马繁育的后代。这些马平衡感极其出色、敏锐善感、脚下动作飞快，且以惊人的滑停（big stoppers）能力著称。然而，这支血统却有一个离奇的遗传怪癖——它们似乎能“看见鬼魂”。谢里丹戏称，大约每三个月毫无预兆地，这些马就会彻底“掉线”（check out），突然判定当前环境极度危险，不顾一切要跑回马厩；骑手要么被它甩飞、要么面临马匹后翻的危险，整匹马完全陷入失控的惊恐状态，罗根打趣说这就像开着一辆克尔维特跑车，开着开着车子突然自己决定掉头开回家。谢里丹进一步解释，很多这类马其实天生失聪。在马匹遗传学中，如果马匹面部带有大片白斑且白毛蔓延过眼睛上方（常见的白斑基因如 Splashed White），这类马通常大概率是全聋的。正因为听不到声音，它们对地面传来的震动异常敏感，作为被捕食动物（prey animals），任何地面的微小震动都会被它们解读为危险捕食者的逼近。谢里丹分享了一次参赛经历：当他正准备骑马进场时，场边聚集了一帮为某位意大利骑手狂热助威的观众，他们疯狂敲打围栏，剧烈的震动直接让谢里丹的马彻底吓蒙，仿佛感受到有一整群大象狂奔而来一样当场失控。 - **遗传学特征**：面部大面积白毛高过眼睛的马匹常携带导致耳聋的基因突变。 - **感官补偿机制**：失聪的马无法接收声音信号，但对蹄下地面的振动极为敏感，容易诱发被捕食动物逃跑的应激本能。 ### [03:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=224s) 台球传奇 Shane Van Boening 与超专注状态失聪现象引发了两人对专注力与感官屏蔽的讨论。罗根提到历史上最伟大的美式台球选手之一谢恩·范伯宁（Shane Van Boening）。范伯宁天生患有重度听力障碍，平日需要佩戴助听器，但在正式比赛时，他会果断关掉助听器，一瞬间将整个喧嚣的世界隔绝在外。进入无声环境后，范伯宁的世界里只剩下球与几何线路，进入神一般的极度专注状态（the zone），其走位精度控制在毫米级别。范伯宁以极致的控球走位和每天长达10小时的痴迷训练闻名，不仅技术恐怖，更五次斩获台球界最难夺冠的美国公开赛（US Open 9-Ball Championship）冠军，历史上仅有传奇球手厄尔·斯特里克兰（Earl Strickland）能与之平分秋色。罗根与谢里丹赞叹道，普通人打台球只是娱乐，而职业顶尖高手手里的球杆与白球如同肉身延展的一部分，无论多远的距离都能精准走位。失聪虽然是生理缺陷，但在高压竞赛中反而变成了一种屏蔽外界欢呼与噪音干扰的超强优势。 ```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: Shane Van Boening 专注状态机制 accDescr: 展示生理感知关闭如何促成职业台球比赛中的极致超专注表现 subgraph Sensory["感官控制"] A["关闭助听器"] --> B["屏蔽全场噪音与喝彩"] end subgraph Focus["心流状态"] B --> C["沉浸于几何与球路"] C --> D["毫米级母球走位控制"] end subgraph Result["竞技成果"] D --> E["五夺美国公开赛冠军"] end ``` ### [05:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=330s) ADHD、药物干预与超能力的双刃剑两人顺势探讨了注意力缺陷多动障碍（ADHD）与自闭特质对于顶尖成就的影响。谢里丹认为，几乎在任何领域做到极致顶尖的人，身上往往都带有 ADHD 或轻微自闭症的影子。他透露自己小时候曾被确诊为多动症并被要求服药，但药物带来的感觉如同接受了“脑白质切除术”（lobotomized），让人变得呆滞麻木。谢里丹很快抗拒并停药，幸亏父母决定顺其自然，放任他在户外奔跑发泄精力。罗根回忆起二十多岁住在加利福尼亚时，邻居将原本活泼好动的小男孩送去服药，孩子迅速变得眼神呆滞、神情扁平，令他深感痛心。罗根庆幸自己的童年没有被推入利他林（Ritalin）等药物的怪圈，否则以自己当时充沛多动的精力，极易被贴上病态标签。两人一致认为，ADHD 如果找到热爱的方向，实际上是一种“超能力”。谢里丹直言，许多人好奇他如何能源源不断撰写出大量剧本，其实秘密就在于热爱所带来的终极“超专注”（hyperfocus）——一旦进入故事世界，哪怕身处坐满上千人、嘈杂不堪的机场大厅，他也能连续写作12小时而不受丝毫干扰；但反过来，若让他去听无关紧要、毫无兴趣的内容，他的大脑便会彻底关闭。 ### [07:26](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=446s) 现代公立教育制度的弊端与思想灌输从多动特质的扼杀，两人进一步将反思延伸至现代公共教育体系。罗根指出，现行教育模式的底层逻辑是完全本末倒置的：它强行把生机勃勃、精力充沛的孩子按在冰冷的课桌前，迫使他们长时间保持静坐、强吞枯燥乏味的内容，硬生生扼杀了孩子的天性。孩子们整天都在内心苦苦挣扎，竭力压抑想要尖叫、冲出校门奔向户外的原始冲动。谢里丹补充指出，现代公立教育体制最初很大程度上是由洛克菲勒等工业财阀推动建立的，其核心初衷并非培育独立自由的思想家，而是为工厂和军队标准化批量生产“顺从的工人与士兵”（compliant workers and soldiers）。罗根赞同并表示，这也解释了为何学校制度倾向于将入学年龄不断提前：越早让孩子进入规训体系，就越容易通过反复灌输（programming）塑造他们的意识形态与服从性，无论灌输的内容是忠诚誓词、社会议题、宗教信仰还是政治党派偏好，心智尚未成熟的幼童都极易被过早地格式化。 ### [08:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=528s) 意识形态渗透与“非营利组织”背后的利益链条乔·罗根与泰勒·谢里丹谈到极端组织为何倾向于招募儿童充当自杀式炸弹袭击者——因为青少年缺乏成熟的判断力，极易受到意识形态洗脑和情感操纵，而一个四十多岁、有家室的成年人绝不会轻易被说服在身上绑满炸药。顺着这一逻辑，两人将话题转向了潜移默化的社会分化与幕后资金网。谢里丹指出，只要顺藤摸瓜去查那些非营利组织（NPO）与非政府组织（NGO）的资金来源，就会发现惊人的事实：几十年来，卡塔尔、俄罗斯、中国等境外敌对势力一直在向西方内部的各类社会激进团体注资，其核心目的就是从内部瓦解和撕裂美国社会。罗根对此深表赞同，并提到前苏联克格勃叛逃特工尤里·别兹缅诺夫（Yuri Bezmenov）在 1984 年接受采访时的著名预言。别兹缅诺夫当时就精准描绘了颠覆一个国家的完整步骤：通过马克思主义和激进思潮系统性地渗透高等学府，毒害年轻一代的大脑，将爱国主义打上负面标签，并在全社会制造仇恨与分裂。谢里丹总结道，看穿这些闹剧的逻辑其实极为简单——“只要看看最终究竟是谁从中获益即可”。 - **资金潜伏期**：境外势力向西方各类分裂性社会运动团体的资金输送已持续了 40 至 50 年。 - **别兹缅诺夫的颠覆理论**：意识形态颠覆不是在一朝一夕完成的，而是通过大学教育数十年潜移默化的洗脑，彻底瓦解国民的文化自豪感与国家凝聚力。 --- ### [10:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=658s) “流浪汉产业”的利益悖论与加州的荒唐基建罗根指出，撕裂不仅来自外部势力，美国内部更有大量人靠制造和利用对立大发横财。非营利组织在理论上极具道德吸引力——富人自愿捐款帮助弱势群体，是人性中最美好的一面；然而现实中，绝大多数善款最终都被高昂的机构运营成本和员工薪水吞噬。谢里丹一针见血地指出了其中的体制悖论：如果一家 NGO 的使命是解决洛杉矶的流浪汉危机，一旦流浪汉问题真的被彻底解决，这个机构就失去了存在的价值和资金来源。因此，在畸形的激励机制下，这些机构不仅不会去解决问题，反而有充足的动力让危机“变得更严重、周期拖得更长、规模弄得更大”，以此来争取更多拨款。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 非营利组织的逆向激励闭环 accDescr: 描述非营利组织在解决社会问题时面临的利益冲突机制 subgraph S1["资金获取"] A["设立 NGO 针对社会危机 (如洛杉矶流浪汉问题)"] --> B["获取巨额公共与慈善拨款"] end subgraph S2["利益锁定与失控"] B --> C["高额运营管理费与员工薪酬"] C --> D{"彻底解决问题？"} D -- "是" --> E["机构解散、失去资金流"] D -- "否 / 恶化危机" --> F["问题规模扩大，呼吁更多资金"] F --> B end ``` 两人随后痛斥加州低效且腐败的治理模式。加州政府在流浪汉问题上耗费了高达 240 亿美元，资金去向却成了一笔烂账，州长加文·纽森甚至动用否决权阻止了针对该项目的独立财务审计。罗根调侃道，加州不仅审计成谜，公共工程也是荒谬透顶：耗资上千亿美元的高铁工程至今只建了一英里多，成了“通往虚无的烂尾轨道”；而在高速公路旁修建给美洲狮等野生动物通行的生态天桥，不仅造价飙升至上亿美元且数年未能完工。谢里丹直言，这种野生动物通道在美国西部其他州司空见惯，铺几块水泥、填上草皮几个月就能低成本搞定，唯独在逻辑崩塌的加州成了吞噬纳税人资金的无底洞。 - **加州流浪汉支出**：高达 240 亿美元的公款投入，无账目可查，审计提案遭纽森州长直接否决。 - **高额基建讽刺**：耗费上千亿美元的“加州高铁”目前只完成了大约一英里；一个简单的野生动物天桥耗资破亿且旷日持久。 --- ### [12:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=765s) 俄勒冈的极端提案：彻底取缔打猎、捕鱼与畜牧业荒唐的政策逻辑并不局限于加州。罗根提到俄勒冈州即将在 11 月公投的一项极端法案。该法案以冠冕堂皇的“制止虐待动物”为名获得了足够的签名并成功登上选票，但仔细研读其具体条款，内容竟然是彻底禁止狩猎、禁止捕鱼、禁止畜牧养殖，以及禁止以任何方式伤害动物——这意味着在俄勒冈州甚至连宰杀用于肯德基的肉鸡都将构成违法。谢里丹听罢惊呼：“不准捕鱼？不准放牧？你们他妈的是嗑药嗑嗨了吗？” 随后，谢里丹从牧场主的专业视角拆解了这一乌托邦想法的毁灭性后果。全美目前拥有大约 9,100 万头牛，如果法律全面禁止饲养和管理牲畜，牧场主自然不会自掏腰包继续喂养它们，这些牲畜将被迫遗弃流落荒野： 1. **失控繁殖**：公牛一旦失去隔离管理，将在野外不受节制地交配繁殖，原本的 9,100 万头牛在三十年内就会暴增到近 9 亿头。 2. **公共安全崩溃**：失去围栏束缚的成年公牛会冲上高速公路造成致命车祸，闯入居民区撞塌围栏、攻击宠物狗、踩踏平民。罗根感叹，现代很多选民早就失去了基本常识，根本不需要逻辑推演，全凭一种“情绪氛围（vibe）”在生活。激进团体只需要起一个“保护可爱动物”的诱人口号，就能让一大群长期依赖抗抑郁药物（SSRIs）的城市人群盲目投下赞成票。 --- ### [15:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=918s) 素食乌托邦的虚妄与农业背后的隐形杀戮罗根查阅了《纽约时报》关于该提案发起人的报道。令人哭笑不得的是，这项可能摧毁俄勒冈州农业命脉的提案，最初仅仅是由一个从南加州搬到波特兰的代课老师、纯素主义者一人发起，通过街头征集到了 13.5 万个签名送入公投体系。发起人声称其理想是“建立一个不再杀害或伤害任何动物的系统”。罗根对此嗤之以鼻，怒斥所谓“系统”纯属无知空谈，大自然本身就是弱肉强食的残酷世界——当一只美洲狮闯入羊圈将羊群活活撕碎时，难道会比人类屠宰更有道德慈悲？谢里丹借此谈到了自己编剧的电视剧《黄石》（*Yellowstone*）中凯文·科斯特纳（饰演约翰·达顿）痛斥素食抗议者的经典名场面：**“一只动物究竟要长得多可爱，你才会在乎它的死活？”** 无论是激进的纯素食倡导者还是城市居民，都对现代农业背后的生命代价视而不见： - **耕作与整地的隐形代价**：仅仅是为了种植素食主义者所需的农作物，拖拉机犁地翻土时，就会碾碎数以百万计的田鼠、蛇类、地栖鸟类与昆虫。 - **基建破坏**：为了运输蔬菜而修建的平整公路，彻底摧毁了沿途所有的原生微生态。 - **商业授粉的蜜蜂死亡**：为了满足城市人对牛油果（鳄梨）和扁桃仁（巴旦木）的庞大消费需求，每年有数十亿只商业蜜蜂被跨国、跨大洲长途运输到果园中强制授粉，最终成批力竭而死。罗根与谢里丹指出，人类只要生存并摄入食物，就无法脱离对其他生物生命的掠夺。那些自诩道德高尚、以为吃沙拉就不伤害生命的激进分子，不过是把杀戮隐藏在了自己看不见的农业供应链尽头。 ### [18:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1084s) 杏仁的驯化与“杏仁奶”的消费陷阱对话从小小的坚果展开，乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）和泰勒·谢里丹（Taylor Sheridan）惊叹于种植杏仁所耗费的恐怖水资源——生产单颗杏仁竟然需要消耗整整 19 加仑的水，换算下来每磅杏仁的耗水量高达上千加仑。泰勒随后分享了一段鲜为人知的农业驯化史：在地中海早期，野生杏仁含有剧毒的生物碱（如马钱子碱等毒素）。远古时期的智人或尼安德特人在野外观察时发现，松鼠居然会挑选特定树上的坚果进食，而避开其他树。古人借此分辨出哪些树结出的果实无毒，并顺藤摸瓜将那些松鼠不碰的有毒杏树全部砍伐、连根拔除，最终完成了人类历史上最早的植物驯化之一。泰勒作为一名职业编剧，坦言自己对社会中滥用词汇的现象深恶痛绝，其中最让他无法忍受的就是“杏仁奶”（Almond milk）。泰勒直言这玩意儿充其量只能叫“杏仁汁”（Almond juice），甚至连果汁都算不上，因为这根本不是靠压榨原汁提取的，其真实本质就是把杏仁粉碎后浸泡在水里萃取风味，本质上就是一碗加了各种添加剂和大量糖分的“浸泡杏仁茶”。罗根深有同感地补充道，他的好友邓肯·特鲁塞尔（Duncan Trussell）曾一度深信杏仁奶是超级健康食品，直到罗根在电话里让他亲眼看看配料表上的含糖量，邓肯才震惊得目瞪口呆。 - 生产 1 颗杏仁需要消耗约 19 加仑（约 72 升）的水资源，属于典型的高耗水作物。 - 远古人类通过观察松鼠对野生苦杏仁的取食选择，淘汰有毒植株，完成了早期杏仁驯化。 - 商业杏仁奶常通过大量添加糖和添加剂掩盖寡淡口感，营造出“天然健康”的营销假象。 --- ### [21:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1272s) 草酸盐风险与被颠覆的健康饮食认知罗根提到自己的医生在验血后发出警告，指出他体内的草酸盐（Oxalates）指标偏高。当医生得知罗根平时大量食用坚果和无麸质烘焙食品（大量采用杏仁粉替代小麦粉）后，明确要求他立刻减少摄入，因为坚果正是高草酸的重灾区。研究数据显示，杏仁每 100 克就含有大约 296 毫克的草酸盐，折合每颗坚果含有约 4 毫克草酸；这些物质在体内循环并经由肾脏过滤后进入尿液，极易在敏感人群体内结晶形成肾结石。这种隐形健康威胁也让罗根反思起自己过去的养生弯路。他曾长年坚持每天早晨空腹饮用自制的绿色羽衣甘蓝超级果昔（Kale smoothie），将大量生羽衣甘蓝与苹果、生姜、大蒜搅拌饮用，自以为无比健康。直到另一位医生直截了当地制止他，解释说未经烹煮的羽衣甘蓝会让人体系统瞬间遭受海量草酸盐的剧烈冲击，必须彻底煮熟并将富含草酸的煮菜水滤掉才能安全食用。医生甚至建议他不如去吃培根和鸡蛋。罗根感慨，社会的健康与营养建议充斥着荒谬的误导，从早年由大型食品制造巨头出于商业利益游说设立的“膳食指南金字塔”，到近年来被彻底颠覆的营养学常识，人们在探索究竟该吃什么的道路上走得异常曲折。 - 杏仁属于极高草酸食物，每 100 克含约 296 毫克草酸盐（单颗约 4 毫克），过量摄入会显著增加肾结石患病风险。 - 羽衣甘蓝等绿色蔬菜富含草酸，生打果昔会加重肾脏代谢负担，需通过高温焯煮使草酸析入水中滤除。 - 传统以谷物为底座的膳食金字塔深受谷物食品巨头商业利益驱使，近年来在现代营养科学中已被全面反思与逆转。 --- ### [23:41](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1421s) 牛肉产业的非工业化本质与土地放牧逻辑谈到食物来源，泰勒纠正了大众对于牛肉产业能够实现“全盘高度工业化”的认知误区。他指出，由于极度低效的经济转化比，肉牛养殖无法像养鸡或种植农作物那样做到完全集约的工业化流水线。即便是加州 5 号州际公路旁著名的哈里斯牧场（Harris Ranch），其本质也仅仅是个育肥场（Feedlot）——即在肉牛屠宰前的 90 到 150 天内集中饲喂谷物增重。牛真正的核心生命周期必须依靠放牧完成。泰勒解释道，农耕在可耕作土地上的产出效率远高于放牧，因此养牛的最佳场景恰恰是那些地表崎岖、布满碎石、根本无法耕作的贫瘠土地。反刍动物拥有极为神奇的消化系统，能够从原生野草等劣质蛋白质来源中代谢并转化出高质量的人体所需蛋白。此外，原生草原如果不经过草食动物的适度啃食践踏，反而会被恶性杂草彻底覆盖退化；草地在被合理放牧时生长得最为茂盛，这使得中央集权的工业化模式在放牧端彻底失效。过去，全美 90% 以上的牛肉屠宰与分切加工被四大包装巨头（Major Packing Houses）严密垄断，普通汉堡肉往往掺杂着来自澳大利亚的淘汰公牛或巴西的劣质碎肉。但泰勒观察到，COVID-19 疫情反而为中小型独立农牧场主带来了破局生机：各地纷纷兴建起中小型 USDA 认证屠宰设施，处理速度不再是工业化大厂的一小时 800 头，而是每小时仅处理 50 头左右。这让消费者可以直接绕过中间商，向德克萨斯、爱荷华、内布拉斯加和蒙大拿等真正专注于高品质牛种饲养的当地家庭牧场直购优质牛肉。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 牛肉供应链从传统垄断到直销模式的演变 accDescr: 对比传统四大巨头垄断供应链与新兴USDA小规模直销供应链的路径差异 subgraph LandGrazing["放牧生态阶段"] A["崎岖不可耕作土地"] --> B["草食反刍动物转化原生牧草"] B --> C["育肥场短期增重 (90-150天)"] end subgraph TraditionalPath["传统垄断屠宰模式"] C --> D["四大工业化包装厂 (每小时处理800+头)"] D --> E["大型商超与混杂碎肉汉堡 (含进口淘汰牛碎肉)"] end subgraph DirectPath["疫情后新兴直销模式"] C --> F["中小型独立 USDA 认证设施 (每小时处理约50头)"] F --> G["高品质产区直购牛肉 (德州/爱荷华/内布拉斯加/蒙大拿)"] end ``` --- ### [25:55](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1555s) 6666牧场的残酷管理与《黄石》中的牛仔浪漫当聊到大型传统牧场的实际运作时，泰勒提到了著名的四六牧场（Four Sixes Ranch / 6666 Ranch）。这座占地广达 30 万英亩的传奇大牧场，日常运作实际上仅仅依靠 12 名职业牛仔在打理。面对罗根“12 个人如何监管如此庞大土地”的惊叹，泰勒详细拆解了其高度去中心化的高效营区管理体系：牧场以格思里（Guthrie）小镇为轴心，被划分为不同的管辖营地（Camps）。例如南营（South Camp）负责统辖 5 万英亩的广袤土地，其下再被细分为若干个 7,000 至 10,000 英亩的分区大草场，其中单是一个超大草场就足有 14,000 英亩；北营及其他外围营地也依此类推。这意味着，平均每位牛仔身上都肩负着 3.5 万到 5 万英亩土地及其牲畜的巡视与维护责任。罗根感慨道，泰勒编剧执导的剧集（尤其是《黄石》）之所以能够引发全美乃至全球观众的强烈共鸣，正是因为它成功将这种“残酷而艰辛的高强度体力劳作”淬炼成了一种具有宿命感的纯粹浪漫。观众在荧幕上看到那些牛仔毫无保留地将生命奉献给牧场，整日挥汗如雨、精疲力竭地应对恶劣环境，在黄昏劳作结束后围坐在一起，那种简单、粗粝、彼此托付后背的质朴生活击中了无数身处现代文明异化中的都市人。泰勒对此深表认同，并指出这种生存状态代表了一种极其纯正、独一无二的美国式自由——牧场将牛仔安置到南营的平房前，留下的指令干脆利落：“好了，这是你在南营的家，咱们大概一周后再见。”在那片辽阔的天地里，没有任何微观管理与官僚束缚，剩下的全部交由个人去面对荒野与担当。 ### [28:16](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1696s) 荒原牛仔的真实生活与科班教育泰勒·谢里丹（Taylor Sheridan）向乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）描绘了四六牧场（6666 Ranch）牛仔们极为纯粹而硬核的日常生活。在幅员辽阔的牧场里，牛仔们分配到各自负责的马匹组，巡视着辽阔土地上的每一寸角落，时刻掌握牲畜的动态。在这里，完全没有现代企业里繁琐的“每周例会”，所有人全凭自觉和本领去把事情搞定。罗根好奇他们如何获取生活必需品，谢里丹解释称，最近的城镇距离牧场有足足 90 英里，进城采购本身就是一场浩大的探险，大家通常每周才进城一次，备齐整周物资后再返回荒原。许多人对牛仔群体抱有刻板印象，认为他们只是世代生活在荒原上的粗人。谢里丹纠正了这种偏见：尽管大多数牛仔确实在牧场长大、世代相传并热爱这份职业，但他们其实都受过极高水平的正规教育。谢里丹牧场里的几乎每一位牛仔，都持有正规大学的“牧场管理”专业学位。当罗根询问想当牛仔该去哪所大学时，谢里丹列举了得克萨斯理工大学（Texas Tech University）和得克萨斯基督教大学（TCU）顶尖的牧场管理项目，以及得克萨斯农工大学（Texas A&M University）。此外，牧场常驻全职兽医负责庞大的马匹繁育体系，这些兽医大多毕业于科罗拉多州立大学（Colorado State University）或得克萨斯农工大学等顶尖大型动物兽医学院。 - 牧场生活特点：远离城市 90 英里，每周进城采购一次补给，无任何繁琐的公司例会。 - 教育背景：牛仔普遍拥有大学牧场管理学位，主要来自得克萨斯理工大学、TCU 及得克萨斯农工大学。 - 医疗保障：常驻专业兽医负责马匹繁育，多来自科罗拉多州立大学等顶尖兽医学府。 --- ### [29:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1780s) 极简影视工业化：从《猎凶风河谷》到庞大美剧帝国罗根惊叹于谢里丹如何能一边管理庞大的超级牧场，一边同时运作几十部大热美剧。谢里丹透露，自己极高产出的秘诀在于极其精简、忠诚的核心制作班底。这支核心团队自拍摄独立电影《猎凶风河谷》（Wind River）时便与他生死与共。谢里丹回忆起当时在犹他州北部零下 7 度的极寒山顶上，自己与第一副导演及摄影指导本·理查森（Ben Richardson）冻得发抖，整整一周见不到制片人的影子，他甚至开玩笑说：“伙计们，我们手里拿着他们的投资款，他们根本不知道我们在哪，我们完全可以卷钱跑去夏威夷逍遥。”正是这支熬过极端困境的班底，随后无缝接拍了《黄石》（Yellowstone）、《金斯敦市长》（Mayor of Kingstown）、《1883》、《1923》、《母狮》（Lioness）以及《石油大佬》（Landman）等一系列作品。谢里丹实行完全的内部晋升机制：曾经的片场助理（PA）如今已成为第一副导演，曾经的跟机员、摄影操作员如今已独立执导剧集。整个团队对谢里丹的工作方式心领神会，彻底摒弃了好莱坞臃肿繁复的中层官僚流程。好莱坞电视台往往热衷于开没完没了的研讨会——比如专门讨论剧本基调的“基调会”（Tone Meeting），或是要求展示所有剧组道具的“道具展示会”。谢里丹对此极为反感：“难道你们不会直接读剧本吗？还要开会讨论什么基调？难道我用哪个打火机还要你们批准？”他干脆决定所有剧集直接沿用同一款 Bic 打火机，省去一切无意义的沟通内耗。通常好莱坞剧集开拍前需要长达 12 周的筹备期，而谢里丹的团队只需 4 周即可开机，且凭借连续不断的高口碑商业成功，让各大平台方彻底放权不再插手干预。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 影视制作流程对比 accDescr: 对比传统好莱坞繁琐低效的官僚流程与谢里丹团队的极简高效生产线 subgraph Traditional["好莱坞传统制作流程（耗时12周筹备）"] T1["剧本研读与多层审核"] --> T2["基调研讨会 Tone Meeting"] T2 --> T3["道具展示会等中层繁琐审查"] T3 --> T4["漫长的官僚决策与漫长开机"] end subgraph Sheridan["泰勒·谢里丹极简流程（耗时4周筹备）"] S1["核心编导统一决策"] --> S2["风河谷原班骨干内部晋升"] S2 --> S3["标准化道具与无会议工作制"] S3 --> S4["4周内高速开机实拍"] end ``` - 核心班底：直接沿用《猎凶风河谷》团队（包括摄影师 Ben Richardson），自下而上内部提拔导演与主创。 - 筹备效率：业内常规电视剧前期筹备需要 12 周，谢里丹团队仅需 4 周。 - 拒绝会议内耗：砍掉剧本基调会、道具展示会等中层官僚环节，统一定制规则提高决策速度。 --- ### [32:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1966s) 《石油大佬》、能源依赖与荒谬的“家庭核反应堆” 谈到热播剧《石油大佬》（Landman），罗根对其上瘾般的叙事和荒诞黑色幽默赞不绝口，尤其是比利·鲍伯·松顿（Billy Bob Thornton）在剧中的精湛演出。谢里丹透露，这部戏就是完全为松顿量身定制的。动笔写一个字之前，谢里丹就先找松顿当面谈妥：“如果你不接，我就不写了，我不想白费功夫。”松顿问剧集讲什么，谢里丹直白地回答：“我打算把你《圣诞坏公公》（Bad Santa）里的角色搬到西得克萨斯，让他去经营一家石油公司。”松顿当场爽快答应：“听起来太他妈棒了。” 罗根提到这部剧不仅好看，还具备强烈的现实科普价值，揭示了普通人难以想象的石油开采内幕。谢里丹指出，现代文明对石油的依赖深入骨髓，各行各业都离不开它；尽管大众热衷于争论化石能源的利弊，但冰冷的现实是人类目前根本没有成熟的替代能源。任何气候学家和工程师都会承认，唯一真正有希望彻底替代化石燃料的是“冷核聚变”（Cold Fusion），而那至少还需要 30 到 40 年的时间。两人随后讽刺了近期科技圈鼓吹的“咖啡机大小的家用微型核反应堆”。罗根与谢里丹都认为让普通人在家里放核反应堆无异于自杀——现代人甚至连金属不能放微波炉加热都不明白，还会经常忘关燃气灶，人类当前的文明心智完全不足以安全驾驭家用级核电。 - 《石油大佬》角色构思：直接将《圣诞坏公公》里的荒唐反英雄移植到西得克萨斯石油工业圈。 - 能源现实：冷核聚变是真正意义上替代石油燃料的最大希望，但成熟商用预计至少仍需 30 至 40 年。 - 科技反思：大城市建造高规格集中核电站切实可行，但普及“家用个人微型核反应堆”极其危险荒诞。 --- ### [35:20](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=2120s) 地缘石油博弈与委内瑞拉的秘密声波武器行动谢里丹与罗根进一步探讨了能源背后的地缘政治格局。伊朗问题和霍尔木兹海峡（Strait of Hormuz）之所以牵动全球神经，根源在于全球约 40% 的石油运输都需要经由该海峡进出，中东地区的军事部署本质上也是针对东方大国能源供应链的一步关键地缘大棋。罗根随后将话题转向近期传出的美军特种部队在委内瑞拉实施的惊人突袭行动。罗根感叹这起行动如同最夸张的谍战大片：“如果泰勒你把这写进电影剧本里，观众肯定会骂‘泰勒，这太假了’。”据传美军特种部队直接机降至高层建筑屋顶，在被古巴特种部队重重包围的极度险境下迅速击溃敌方，成功逮捕委内瑞拉总统尼古拉斯·马杜罗（Nicolás Maduro）及其妻子，随后乘直升机撤离。更令人震惊的是，据前总统唐纳德·特朗普公开提及的机密武器信息，特战部队在 1 月 3 日的行动中使用了代号为“Discombobulator”的绝密系统，疑似结合了高科技定向能量与声波武器——类似于此前古巴“哈瓦那综合征”（Havana Syndrome）所遭遇的致晕低频能量的放大版，瞬间瘫痪了现场人员的行动能力，并直接瘫痪了敌方的防空及武器电子系统，使其毫无还手之力。 ### [37:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=2247s) 秘密声波武器与特种部队的精确打击在谈及近年来某些高度保密的特种作战细节时，官方始终保持着绝对沉默。当媒体就某些神秘装备的技术原理与实战细节进行追问时，唐纳德·特朗普（Donald Trump）曾对《纽约邮报》（New York Post）留下过一句耐人寻味的话：“我不能谈论它。”据传在针对马杜罗（Nicolás Maduro）位于坚固堡垒内的古巴精锐安保卫队实施打击时，美方部署了一种极具破坏力的定向声波武器（sonic weapon）。当时防卫人员疯狂按下控制按钮，却发现雷达与俄制、中制火箭发射系统全数瘫痪，器械设备和作战人员同时遭到强力压制。乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）与泰勒·谢里丹（Taylor Sheridan）对此惊叹不已，直言真想坐在保密敏感隔间信息设施（SCIF）里，亲眼看看作战队员佩戴的 GoPro 拍摄下的第一手突袭画面。根据描述，被这种声波武器命中的目标瞬间陷入极端剧痛，直接瘫倒在地完全丧失行动能力，紧接着随行的特种作战狙击手迅速从上方倾泻火力予以压制。此前马杜罗曾在视频中公开叫嚣“有种就来抓我”，结果现实的打击毫无悬念地降临。谢里丹感叹，谁也不知道目前美军最尖端的武器库里究竟藏着怎样不可思议的黑科技，这些以前只存在于科幻小说中的概念，如今已经悄然投入实战。 - 防御系统中的俄制与中制雷达及导弹在关键时刻彻底失灵，所有控制按钮均无响应。 - 堡垒内部的古巴保镖卫队在遭遇声波武器打击后瞬间丧失反抗能力并痛苦倒地。 - 两人感叹在内华达沙漠深处秘密研发的装备，往往比公之于众的实战技术领先整整三到四代。 --- ### [38:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=2322s) 不明空中现象（UAP）背后的特殊准入项目针对近年来甚嚣尘上的不明空中现象（UAP / UFO）听证会与政府披露，乔·罗根坦言自己内心的警报全被拉响了。他坚信政府绝不会无缘无故主动公布核心真相，如果官方突然大张旗鼓地谈论 UAP，背后往往另有隐情。罗根认为，军方和情报界数十年来一直隐藏着多项极高密级的特殊准入项目（Special Access Programs, SAP），这些项目研发出了颠覆性的全新推进系统（novel propulsion system），而天空中频繁被目击的奇异飞行器，极大概率就是军方自己在空域中进行秘密测试的人造产物。谢里丹随之提出了一个反思：如果宇宙中真有技术遥遥领先的高等智慧生命偶然撞见了如此野蛮的人类，他们为什么不干脆一发导弹彻底摧毁这颗充满争斗的蓝色星球？罗根分析认为，宇宙中任何拥有部族倾向和领地意识的智慧物种，在漫长的演化道路上都必然要经历一段充满动荡与杀戮的“青春期”。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 高等文明对地球人类的观察与演化模型 accDescr: 展示智慧生命观察人类经历文明青春期而不直接干预的推演逻辑 subgraph Phase1["文明观察前提"] A["高等地外文明发现地球"] --> B["识别出人类具有部族与领地本能"] end subgraph Phase2["演化青春期规律"] B --> C["必须经历野蛮与自省的成长阶段"] C --> D["过早人工干预无法促成自主成熟"] end subgraph Phase3["旁观与底线遏制"] D --> E["保持距离旁观国际局势演变"] E --> F["底线：防止核战争自我毁灭"] end ``` --- ### [40:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=2410s) 历史的残暴过往与文明演化的“青春期” 罗根以历史人物“穿刺公”弗拉德（Vlad the Impaler，吸血鬼德古拉的原型）为例，讲述了人类过往令人发指的野蛮行径。弗拉德在对抗奥斯曼土耳其大军时，曾将成千上万的战俘活生生穿在尖木桩上，沿着道路排成星形等复杂的几何图案，用尸体长廊对行进中的敌军实施极致的心理震慑。人类的历史充斥着这种赤裸裸的残暴，但罗根指出，随着时代推移，人类文明正在以极其缓慢的步伐变得“稍微不那么糟糕”——尽管世界上仍然存在种族灭绝等恶行，但主流社会对其容忍度已大幅降低，更多人会发自内心地感到震惊与谴责。罗根借用育儿经验打比方：父母不能在孩子每次跌倒时都直接把他扶起来，必须让他犯错、受伤并学会自行收拾残局，唯有如此才能真正成熟。同理，如果地外高等文明正在暗中注视人类，最明智的做法绝不是强行降临并教导我们如何生存，而是退居幕后保持观察，唯一的红线是阻止人类动用核武器自我毁灭，给予这个脆弱的物种足够的时间去自我进化和适应。 - 弗拉德通过大规模尖桩刑将奥斯曼土耳其战俘排列成几何阵型，作为残酷的心理战武器。 - 相比纳粹德国等历史黑暗时期，当代文明在道德约束和对反人类暴行的排斥上已取得微弱但实质性的进步。 - 对待发展中文明如同养育孩童，自主犯错与自我纠偏是走向成熟不可替代的前提。 --- ### [42:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=2552s) 自主决定权与绝对平均：通向极权的集体主义陷阱谢里丹指出，当一个社会积累了极其丰厚的财富后，总会出现一种假借“同情心”之名的思潮，诱导人们开始质疑财富并狂热追求所谓的“绝对平均”（Equity）。在这种极端构想中，货币被废除，所有人必须脱离市场机制为了所谓的“集体”劳动，且人人享有完全相同的回报。然而谢里丹直击要害地反问：在这样的社会中，究竟由谁来决定谁去扫垃圾？由谁来决定谁代表国家参加奥运会？又由谁来决定是否批准他去拍摄影视剧？ ```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: 绝对平均主义滑向极权统治的逻辑演变 accDescr: 展示废除货币追求集体分配如何必然导致武力强制与独裁 subgraph Concept["构想阶段"] A["追求绝对平均 (Equity)"] --> B["废除货币与市场机制"] end subgraph Conflict["执行矛盾"] B --> C["分工不均引发抗拒"] C --> D["劳动者拒绝无偿高压工作"] end subgraph Tyranny["权力终局"] D --> E["国家动用武力与枪支强制"] E --> F["彻底沦为极权独裁统治"] end ``` 谢里丹直言，制作高水准影视剧极其艰辛，如果没有任何超额回报，他绝对不可能无偿去做；而一旦个人拒绝服从指派，集体为了运转就必然会动用枪支和国家机器进行强制劳动。个人一旦为了追求虚幻的集体利益而放弃“自我决定权”（self-determination），最终不论初衷多么美好，结局必然是权力高度集中于少数决策者手中，演变为不折不扣的独裁政权（dictatorship）。正如哲学家安·兰德（Ayn Rand）所言，马克思列宁主义、法西斯主义、纳粹主义与极端社会主义之间只有微不足道的表面差异，其内核完全一致——即集体主义之恶与统治阶层操控民众的权力欲。掌权者极其擅长将人群粗暴地划分为“好人”与“敌人”，进而以道德正义为幌子肆意践踏异见者。 - 追求绝对平均的本质是剥夺个体的自我决定权，由中央官僚统揽职业选择与资源分配。 - 高强度创造性劳动无法在缺乏差异化激励的体制下维持，最终必然依赖国家暴力强制。 - 各类极权意识形态均建立在将群体标签化、树立内部敌人并赋予国家无限权力的逻辑之上。 --- ### [45:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=2721s) 制度信任危机、“赢得民心”神话与法治崩塌隐患谢里丹进一步反思了当代社会的制度困境。他认为，即便三十年后回望当下，整个社会依然深陷 COVID 危机遗留的心理创伤之中。这种创伤与其说是病毒本身带来的，不如说是公众对周围所有核心建制——包括政府、传统媒体和大型跨国制药企业——的信任彻底坍塌。更危险的是，政治利益集团在此期间成功利用危机攫取并巩固了权力，而一旦某种手段被证明有效，掌权者就会反复使用，直至其彻底失效。谢里丹将这种执念与美军长期奉行的“赢得民心”（winning hearts and minds）战略进行对比。该战略源于二战后对日本的成功占领，但美军决策层犯了致命的经验主义错误。日本当年之所以顺从改造，根本不是因为美军的民心工程多么奏效，而是因为在两枚原子弹轰炸后，被日本国民视若神明的天皇亲自宣布“忍所不能忍”并主动接受投降，以此换取国家血脉的保全。美军随后盲目将这一模式套用到越南以及后续的历次海外冲突中，无一例外遭遇惨败。谢里丹警告，当今政治生态中无论人们支持还是厌恶特朗普，仅仅因为一人身为联邦政府首脑就公然践踏法治与联邦规则，正在对国家的立国根基造成灾难性的反噬。 - 后疫情时代的深远创伤在于政府、媒体与制药工业等公信力基石的集体瓦解。 - 美军在冷战及中东冲突中生搬硬套对日占领经验，忽视了日本天皇神权投降的特殊政治历史前提。 - 无论个人党派立场如何，以对抗个别领导人为由公然破坏法治与联邦体制，将引发无法挽回的制度灾难。 ### [47:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=2845s) 滑坡效应：极端的执法手段与危险的政治先例乔·罗根与泰勒·谢里丹深入探讨了美国政治中正在迅速恶化的“滑坡效应”（Slippery Slope）。罗根指出，当人们因为讨厌某位总统而拒绝遵守其法律时，这种行为便成为了新的常态；而一旦支持的政客上台，对立阵营也会依样画葫芦拒绝服从，法治根基由此遭到彻底侵蚀。以移民与海关执法局（ICE）的突击搜捕为例，罗根坦言自己绝不支持非法罪犯滞留美国，但当前的做法却开创了一个极其危险的先例——派出一群仅接受过七周培训、荷枪实弹、佩戴面罩且没有任何身份标识的军事化警察在城市中四处抓人，甚至波及并错误拘押了许多合法的美国公民。罗根警告称，公众一旦接受了在本土街道部署军事化警察的逻辑，未来政权轮替时，左翼政府完全可以借用这一既定先例去推行其他政策。例如，如果爆发新的疫情或变异毒株，政府便可能动用同样的武装力量逮捕拒绝接种疫苗的普通人。他回忆道，在此前疫情封锁期间，明尼苏达等地就曾出现过国民警卫队或武装人员荷枪实弹巡街、对着居民大喊“回屋去”的荒谬场面。谢里丹对此深表赞同，他指出，当前的移民法与克林顿、奥巴马执政时期完全一致，法律并未改变，改变的是执法方式；试图用突击抓捕的方式在短期内解决边境积弊，并在没有充分考量后果的情况下设定硬性期限，只会让体制滑向更加难以收拾的深渊。 * **执法争议焦点**：仅受训七周的无标识、蒙面军事化武装力量在城市街道抓捕嫌疑人，导致部分美国本土公民被误抓。 * **滥用前例的担忧**：极端执法权一旦确立，极易在两党轮替后被对方用来强制推行争议政策（如疫情封控或强制疫苗令）。 * **法律本质未变**：谢里丹强调当前执行的依然是克林顿和奥巴马时期的联邦移民法案，核心矛盾在于激进的执行手段与政治化期限。 --- ### [50:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=3018s) 制度操弄、国会任期限制与议员暴富乱象谈及华盛顿的建制派政客，谢里丹直斥这些民选官员只顾眼前选战、毫无长远考量，正在对整个国家造成极其恶劣的伤害。为了迎合党派短视利益，政客们频繁叫嚣废除选举人团制度（Electoral College）、废除阻碍法案通过的冗长辩论（Filibuster），甚至是增加最高法院法官席位（Court-packing）。他们试图彻底拆解并重构政府架构以谋求一时之利，却全然不顾这些被破坏的规则将来也会成为对手清算自己的致命武器，正如俗语所言，“适用于鹅的也同样适用于公鹅”（What's good for the goose is good for the gander）。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 政治短视与法治侵蚀的循环 accDescr: 展示党派为了短期利益破坏制度规则，最终引发恶性循环的逻辑流程。 subgraph 权力争夺 ["执政党寻求短期政治优势"] A["遭遇体制阻碍 / 少数派制衡"] --> B["提议修改核心体制规则 (废除阻长辩论 / 扩充最高法院 / 废除选举人团)"] end subgraph 恶性后果 ["法治侵蚀与反噬"] B --> C["打破宪政惯例与制度护栏"] C --> D["政权轮替后对手以牙还牙"] D --> E["法治根基瓦解与政治极化加剧"] end E -. 进一步加剧.-> A ``` 面对制度腐败，两人一致认为推行**国会任期限制**（Term Limits）是当务之急。谢里丹与罗根建议，众议员和参议员的任职上限均应设为12年（参议员相当于两届任期），这对于公共服务而言已经绰绰有余。随后，罗根尖锐抨击了国会议员利用职权敛财的黑幕：例如南希·佩洛西（Nancy Pelosi）年薪仅17.5万美元，身家却高达近4亿美元。谢里丹直言内情众所周知——议员们通过提前获取IPO内部配额（如Visa上市立法期间的利益关联）大发横财，并在面对记者质询时公然撒谎抵赖。近期包括罗·康纳（Ro Khanna）在内的政客股票交易也在社交平台上引发强烈声讨。公众虽然深知体制腐败，但由于疲于应对家庭、房贷和生活压力，往往只能在抱怨后无奈默认现状。 * **任期改革共识**：主张国会议员任期上限为12年（众议院最多12年，参议院最多两届共12年）。 * **议员财富悖论**：公职年薪仅约17.5万美元，部分老牌政客的资产却累积至近半个十亿美元级别。 * **内幕交易质疑**：立法者在重大行业法案通过前后精准买入相关公司股票或IPO份额，利用信息差形成合法化腐败。 --- ### [52:35](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=3155s) 24小时新闻的堕落：制造恐慌与杰克·坎普的偏见往事谢里丹坦言，作为身兼数职的创作者与牧场经营者，他根本没有多余的时间整天泡在Instagram等社交媒体上去甄别海量信息的真伪，这也是他很少公开谈论政治的原因。然而，传统电视新闻早已彻底失去了公信力，主流媒体充斥着谎言，几乎找不到任何客观中立的报道渠道。他回忆起童年时看电视转播总统候选人辩论的经历：主持人（疑似资深主播丹·拉瑟 Dan Rather）在介绍各候选人时，对其他人极尽溢美之词，罗列其哈佛毕业、法学教授、前参议员等光鲜履历，可轮到杰克·坎普（Jack Kemp）时，导语竟刻意贬低为“前替补四分卫、重生的基督徒杰克·坎普”。谢里丹当时便敏锐地意识到，所谓的客观媒体人正在利用偏见剥夺受众的独立判断权，试图直接替公众做决定。罗根补充指出，CNN等24小时滚动新闻频道的诞生是新闻业彻底走向娱乐化与堕落的转折点。世界上并没有那么多突发大事填满全天24小时，除了战争期间可以播报前线实况外，没有战事时新闻台就只能编造叙事、贩卖立场。如今主流新闻媒体的底层商业模式已经彻底沦为“激怒观众，并吓破他们的胆”（Piss them off and scare the shit out of them），依靠制造焦虑和愤怒来锁定收视率，同时极力掩盖和回避可能冒犯金主广告商的核心事实。 --- ### [55:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=3301s) 武汉实验室、福奇的谎言与主流媒体的滤镜随着对媒体合谋议题的展开，两人谈及了安东尼·福奇（Anthony Fauci）与新冠病毒溯源问题。罗根提及图尔西·加巴德（Tulsi Gabbard）在离任及相关通报中公开揭露福奇在国会听证会上公然撒谎的事实——福奇曾坚决否认，但美国纳税人的资金确实通过“生态健康联盟”（EcoHealth Alliance）流入了中国武汉病毒研究所，用于开展病毒的功能获得性研究（Gain-of-function research）。令人震惊的是，这样重大的国家丑闻在主流媒体上几乎遭到全面冷处理与新闻封锁。谢里丹感叹，对于很多习惯只看报纸和电视的传统受众（包括父母一辈）来说，由于信息茧房的存在，他们对这些确凿内幕依旧一无所知。他表示，在人类近代历史上，几乎没有任何事情像“新冠病毒来自专门研究冠状病毒的武汉实验室”那样显而易见、合乎常理，然而各大主流新闻主播竟然能够面不改色、神情严肃地宣称病毒源自海鲜湿货市场。罗根随即提到了著名喜剧演员乔恩·斯图尔特（Jon Stewart）在史蒂芬·科尔伯特（Stephen Colbert）晚间秀上的经典片段：斯图尔特在节目中以尖锐讽刺的方式直接戳穿了湿货市场的荒谬谎言，而科尔伯特则在旁边极力试图打圆场和掩饰，场面极其滑稽而发人深省。 * **福奇听证争议**：被指控在国会隐瞒美国资金通过生态健康联盟赞助武汉病毒研究所功能获得性研究的事实。 * **媒体认知温差**：依赖网络与独立调查的受众早已熟知内情，而完全依赖传统报刊电视的群体仍然被蒙在鼓里。 * **斯图尔特秀场名场面**：乔恩·斯图尔特在深夜秀中公开嘲弄“实验室门前爆发同类病毒纯属巧合”的官方通稿，引发公众对主流叙事的广泛质疑。 ### [57:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=3429s) 乔恩·斯图尔特的实验室泄漏论与主流媒体公信力崩塌乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）与泰勒·谢里丹（Taylor Sheridan）回顾了乔恩·斯图尔特（Jon Stewart）在斯蒂芬·科尔伯特（Stephen Colbert）晚间秀上的名场面。当时斯图尔特直接从椅子上站起来、越讲越大声，硬生生顶着科尔伯特的阻拦推进他的脱口秀段子。科尔伯特当时试图挡住话头，搬出建制派说辞问“你有没有证据，我想看看证据”，而斯图尔特根本不予理会，一路顶着压力猛讲下去。罗根感叹这在当时是一次极其勇敢的举动，因为在那个时间节点，只要任何人公开指出病毒可能来自中国武汉的实验室，就会被扣上种族主义的帽子。罗根讽刺道：“到底是怎么运作的？说它来自实验室怎么就成种族主义了？它明明就是来自中国，而且生态健康联盟（EcoHealth Alliance）参与资助了该项目，而美国政府又资助了生态健康联盟，白纸黑字的档案证据堆积如山。” 两人接着探讨了围绕伊维菌素（Ivermectin）的舆论抹黑。谢里丹提到疾病控制与预防中心（CDC）等官网上其实早就发布过关于该药物的科研报告，罗根随即补充，当自己因使用伊维菌素而遭到全网围攻、被主流舆论嘲弄是在吃“马用驱虫药”时，他亲自去查阅了官方文献，发现 CDC 官网上赫然挂着论文，明确探讨伊维菌素对抗病毒的特性以及针对新冠病毒的有效性。这种官方资料明写着药物有效、主流舆论却全力阻止民众服用并大肆嘲讽的荒谬撕裂，让整个公众阶层遭遇了严重的信任冲击。这一系列事件对绝大多数普通民众造成了深远的信任危机，公众对新闻媒体残留的一点点信任被彻底侵蚀。罗根与谢里丹指出，新闻媒体失去公信力会导致极其严重的后果：人们失去可信的信息来源，如浮萍般漂泊无依，进而被迫深陷网络信息茧房与各类阴谋论漩涡，最终让社会沟通全面瘫痪。 ### [59:29](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=3569s) 图尔西·加巴德的指控与安东尼·福奇的预先赦免话题转向政坛对于前国家过敏和传染病研究所所长安全与责任的追究。罗根提起图尔西·加巴德（Tulsi Gabbard）关于安东尼·福奇（Anthony Fauci）的重磅演讲，并好奇 NBC、CBS、CNN 等主流媒体是否有任何跟进报道。谢里丹直言，一个政府机构的主管在尚未遭到任何刑事指控的情况下，就通过律师团队拼命游说拜登政府争取预先赦免，直到任期最后一天还在极力争取，这种“未被起诉先求赦免”的行为本身，就是存在违规或犯罪嫌疑的最直观信号。罗根认为这种预先赦免极其离谱，尤其是在参议员兰德·保罗（Rand Paul）就“功能获得性研究”（Gain of Function）严厉质询福奇的听证会之后。保罗在听证会上依照所有标准科学定义指出福奇资助的研究属于功能获得，福奇却傲慢地回应：“恕我直言，你根本不知道你在说什么。”主流媒体和拥护者甚至借机贬低兰德·保罗，称他只是个“眼科医生”。谢里丹与罗根驳斥了这种言论，强调眼科是专科，保罗在专科之前必须读完四年完整的医学院课程、系统学习人体全身医学并获得正规执业医生资格，与福奇接受的基础医学训练完全一致，绝非不懂医学的外行。 - 兰德·保罗在国会质询中围绕功能获得性研究的定义与福奇激烈交锋，而福奇拒不承认。 - 福奇在未面临任何司法起诉前，其律师团队便在最后关头向白宫争取豁免保护。 - 主流媒体起初对加巴德释放出的针对福奇的重磅解密文件与演讲保持集体静默或淡化处理。 ### [01:01:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=3675s) 历史重演：从艾滋病时期的 AZT 悲剧到新冠应对罗根引述小罗伯特·肯尼迪（Robert F. Kennedy Jr.）的著作《真正的安东尼·福奇》（*The Real Anthony Fauci*），指出福奇在新冠期间采取的一整套压制替代疗法、推崇单一药物的策略，与他早在艾滋病流行时期所使用的手段如出一辙。马修·麦康纳主演的电影《达拉斯买家俱乐部》（*Dallas Buyers Club*）所反映的真实背景中，站在对立面阻挠患者获取替代药物的官僚正是福奇。当时福奇强推齐多夫定（AZT），而该药原本是一种因毒性过强、杀人速度比癌症还快而被叫停的化疗药。面对免疫系统严重受损的艾滋病患者甚至是无症状感染者，官方强行推广致命的化疗药物，造成了大量惨剧。罗根还提到了聚合酶链式反应（PCR）测试的发明者凯利·穆利斯（Kary Mullis）对福奇的尖锐批评。穆利斯曾公开指出福奇在诊断领域完全是一窍不通，强调 PCR 本质上是一种实验室复制放大工具，绝不应该被用来直接诊断人体疾病。罗根指出，如果将扩增循环数无限调高，就会产生高达 80% 的假阳性率，新冠期间的大规模筛查正是利用了这种机制制造恐慌；而当年许多人仅仅因为 PCR 检测显示 HIV 假阳性，就被强制使用具有高度致死性的 AZT，最终死于药物毒性。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 医疗官僚危机应对模式对比 accDescr: 对比艾滋病流行期推行AZT与新冠大流行期间推行单一方案的相似路径 subgraph AIDS["艾滋病流行时期 (1980年代)"] A1["高扩增PCR测试产生假阳性"] --> A2["强推剧毒化疗旧药 AZT"] A2 --> A3["压制并阻断其他替代疗法"] end subgraph COVID["新冠大流行时期 (2020年代)"] C1["高循环数PCR测试扩大感染人数"] --> C2["指定单一官方防治与疫苗方案"] C2 --> C3["贬低并封杀伊维菌素等替代药物"] end AIDS -.->|"完全相同的操作策略"| COVID ``` ### [01:02:53](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=3773s) 媒体立场的党派分化与荒谬的政治阵营化在梳理主流媒体对加巴德公布文件的反应时，罗根读到各家报刊的论调：主流新闻界普遍将其定性为“未经证实且政治极化的炸弹”，强调实验室泄漏与自然起源的争论“悬而未决”。罗根对此极其愤怒，直言这场争论早就尘埃落定，“如果你今天还在新闻里宣称关于实验室泄漏还是自然起源依然存在长期争议，那就闭上你的臭嘴，争论早已结束，它百分之百就是实验室泄漏。”右翼媒体将这些文件视为对批评者的平反与掩盖真相叙事的实锤，而主流建制媒体则试图平衡报道，将注意力集中在福奇过去的否认上，并强调尚无司法层面的伪证定罪。谢里丹对公共卫生事件演变为严重的左右党派站队感到极度荒谬与困惑。福奇是一名任职长达约 50 年的职业官僚，历经多任共和党与民主党总统，这本质上是一个公职人员对全体国民撒谎的问责事件，根本不属于政治立场范畴。罗根指出，福奇当年力推 AZT 和后来推销新冠疫苗时，甚至使用了同一套“既安全又有效”（safe and effective）的机械化话术，后世回顾历史时必将认定其为给无数人带来灾难的罪人。两人最后剖析了党派政治如何让大众丧失理智。在特朗普执政初期，卡玛拉·哈里斯（Kamala Harris）和媒体评论员乔伊·里德（Joy Reid）等民主党人曾公开表态“绝不信任特朗普治下研发出的疫苗”；然而政权更迭后，同样的政客和媒体却把全部政治身家押注在疫苗强制令上，任何质疑的人都会被视作异端。罗根感叹人类这种基于派系站队的盲从何其荒唐可悲，但他也保持了一丝乐观：越来越多的人正在经历这种破灭后觉醒，未来要想通过这种低级的党派阵营手段去彻底分裂大众，将会变得越来越困难。 ### [01:06:38](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=3998s) 左右之争的骗局与网络博主曝光欺诈案谈及 2020 年以来的社会撕裂，Joe Rogan 认为现在再想用同样的方式分化大众已经困难得多，因为越来越多的人开始清醒过来，意识到所谓的“左翼与右翼之争本质上就是一个巨大的骗局，目的只是让老百姓互相争斗内耗”。Taylor Sheridan 对此表示完全赞同。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 医疗补助与托儿所欺诈链条流程图 accDescr: 展示虚构福利机构如何通过漏洞套取数千亿美元并引发政治博弈的示意图 subgraph FraudMechanism["欺诈敛财机制"] A["设立虚假托儿所 / 临终关怀机构"] --> B["虚构自闭症等诊断记录"] B --> C["申请巨额 Medicaid / Medicare 补贴"] end subgraph ProtectionAndFallout["利益保护与社会反弹"] C --> D["数千亿美元资金流出"] D --> E["流入政客政治献金金库"] D --> F["网络博主曝光调查"] F --> G["出台限制调查法案 / 掩盖真相"] end ``` 随后讨论转向针对移民与海关执法局（ICE）的抗议活动。Joe 指出，令人惊讶的是，那些规模最大的 ICE 抗议活动发生的地方，恰恰也是网络创作者 Nick Shirley 曝光出数十亿美元欺诈案的核心区域。更荒谬的是，加州甚至试图推动一项法案（常被直接戏称为“Nick Shirley 法案”），专门用来限制和禁止类似针对福利欺诈的民间独立调查。虽然加州给出的辩解是“不能让陌生网民拿着摄像机冲进托儿所窥视”，但 Joe 反驳道：普通人确实不应该带着镜头随意骚扰幼儿园，可如果一个托儿所常年空无一人、连个孩子的影子都没有，账面上却年复一年狂揽数百万美元的政府补贴，这显然就是彻头彻尾的犯罪。 - 网上曾流传所谓“博主堵门、涉案人员开着宾利或劳斯莱斯仓皇逃窜”的视频，两人指出其中不少是后期为了博眼球和流量而摆拍的“骗点击”（engagement farming）假视频。 - 尽管存在摆拍闹剧，但现实中的欺诈规模极其惊人；明尼苏达州官方甚至已经承认福利系统存在严重漏洞与长期欺诈。 --- ### [01:08:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=4137s) 数千亿医保欺诈黑洞与危险的追查代价 Joe 紧接着提及明尼苏达州发生的一桩令人毛骨悚然的凶杀案：一位投票反对为非法移民提供 Medicare 医保资金的女性政治家及其丈夫在自己家中遭到蒙面枪手残忍射杀。凶手落网后甚至声称自己是受明尼苏达州州长 Tim Walz 的指使前去暗杀。Joe 表示虽然凶手极大概率是个神志不清、满嘴胡话的嗑药疯子，但令人细思极恐的巧合在于，受害者恰恰是站在反对医保欺诈风口浪尖的人。这让人联想到埃隆·马斯克（Elon Musk）此前做客播客时的警告。马斯克在推动政府效率部（DOGE）审查时曾直言，联邦医疗保险（Medicare）和医疗补助（Medicaid）欺诈是整个体系中最棘手、水最深的问题。马斯克当时甚至感叹：“这潭水深到我几乎不敢公开多谈，因为我不想招来杀身之祸。” 加州不仅充斥着空壳托儿所，还蔓延着挂羊头卖狗肉的虚假临终关怀中心（fake hospices）。更有甚者，自闭症诊断率在一些群体中诡异暴增，仅仅是因为只要让孩子拿到自闭症诊断，就可以名正言顺地开办自闭症治疗中心，从而通过政府医保项目套取源源不断的天价治疗津贴。Taylor Sheridan 强调，这类欺诈牵涉的资金高达数千亿美元。面对如此惊人的利益蛋糕，任何试图揭露真相的人都会遭到疯狂反扑；而这些贪腐资金的一部分，最终往往通过各种隐秘通道流入了政客的竞选金库，无论是民主党还是共和党，只要有人甘愿为骗局保驾护航，就能从中分一杯羹。 - 奥巴马担任总统期间曾发表高调公开演讲宣称要严厉打击政府欺诈，但随后遭遇了巨大阻力，最终无力推进其构想中的“DOGE 版”政府改革。 - 两人讽刺加州的公共工程效率极度低下，数千亿美元的资金在加州甚至只够修一英里的高铁轨道，或者再盖一座谷歌天桥。 --- ### [01:11:55](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=4315s) 州长市长的本职：从“企业 CEO”到政治议程的迷失话题转到了加州州长 Gavin Newsom。Joe 透露 Newsom 曾想上他的播客，但私下里 Newsom 经常公开冷嘲热讽，一方面宣称“Joe Rogan 不是我的粉丝，但我很喜欢他”，另一方面自己还开办了播客。Taylor 讥讽道，看来加州治理得实在太井井有条了，州长居然闲得有时间录播客；而官方口中所谓的“人口正创纪录地流入加州”完全是对统计数据的扭曲谎言。加州固然拥有得天独厚的完美气候，旧金山也曾是全世界顶尖科技天才汇聚的摇篮，但这些成就根本不是现任政府的功劳。相反，以 Gavin Newsom 和洛杉矶市长 Karen Bass 为代表的管理层展现出的极度无能，正在迅速摧毁加州。他们放弃了法治底线与社会安全，对大街上当街注射毒品的瘾君子抱有畸形的宽容与共情，却对每天必须穿过污秽街道护送孩子上下学的普通家庭视若无睹。 Taylor 分享了自己在编剧《黄石》（Yellowstone）期间与时任蒙大拿州民主党籍州长 Steve Bullock 的一次深度交流。当时 Taylor 向他请教担任州长的真实感受，Bullock 坦言： > “起初我以为自己要掀起各种社会变革、主导宏大叙事，但后来我意识到，我本质上只是一个州的首席执行官（CEO）。我的工作就是照看好全州的居民、管理好公职雇员、招商引资、发展旅游业，让这个州挣更多的钱，让老百姓的生活过得更好。搞好基础设施、城市治理、人事管理与旅游，这就是我的全部职责。” Taylor 指出，对于市长而言更是如此——市长就像一座城市的总裁，首要任务是保障照明、清扫垃圾、扑灭火灾、处理下水道排污以及维持治安。然而，当今许多大城市的执政者完全被空洞的激进社会议程所绑架，根本不在乎城市的日常运转，最终导致大都市不可避免地滑向深渊。 - 洛杉矶曾经是普通人追逐并实现梦想的圣地，如今光彩全无。 - 旧金山的堕落尤为迅速：Joe 回忆自己在旧金山度过了 7 岁到 11 岁的童年时光，直到 2016 年在旧金山 The Fillmore 剧场录制单口喜剧专场《Triggered》时，整座城市依然充满魅力、安全且极具文化底蕴。然而仅仅过了 10 年，在荒谬透顶的市政治理下，旧金山就已经变得面目全非，沦为由游民产业支配的废墟。 ### [01:15:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=4544s) 无家可归危机、芬太尼泛滥与医疗用药体验 Joe Rogan 与 Taylor Sheridan 深入探讨了美国街头的无家可归问题及其背后的利益驱动。Rogan 指出，现在的无家可归现象在某种层面上被当成了一种“有价值的生意”：街头流浪者越多、问题越显眼，相关部门与机构就能申请到越多的预算和资金来应对，然而根本没有人真正打算去解决它。Sheridan 对此表示认同，提到目前普遍的做法居然是免费发放针头，甚至是手机，变相纵容吸毒者在街头自生自灭。他直言这种所谓的“善举”本质上是极端残忍的；面对满街如行尸走肉般倚靠在街角的重度成瘾者，真正的救助不应是递上注射器，而是把他们带离街头、强制实行宵禁与脱毒治疗，哪怕有些人并不愿意被管制。芬太尼危机的致命程度引出了两人关于强效镇痛药物的切身体会。Sheridan 提到自己曾接受过颈椎手术，术后在医院被注射了芬太尼。他心有余悸地感叹：“那是完全不同的感觉——有一般的‘飘’，然后是那个鬼东西（fentanyl）的‘高’。”他强调，那是麻醉医生在正规医院严格把控下施用的剂量，自己完全无法想象有人居然在停车场的脏乱角落里自行吸食这种药物，难怪街头成瘾者会彻底沦陷。 - **街头救助的异化**：政策未着眼于强制戒毒与收容，反而发放针具与物资，助长了露天吸毒和药物成瘾泛滥。 - **芬太尼的药力威力**：术后正规医疗剂量的芬太尼体验已极其极端，凸显出街头非法滥用的毁灭性后果。 --- ### [01:17:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=4630s) 颈椎手术教训与 Regenokine 生物疗法得知 Sheridan 在三年前切除并削薄了破裂的 C6-C7 颈椎间盘后，Rogan 极力劝告他未来切勿轻易再做切除手术，因为每一次切除都会导致椎间盘组织永久变少。Rogan 结合自身严重的颈椎间盘突出经历，分享了他成功避免手术的替代方案——Regenokine 疗法（一种高级自体血小板及血清疗法）。他提到早期美国患者必须飞往德国接受治疗，包括著名运动员 Kobe Bryant、Peyton Manning 以及 UFC 总裁 Dana White 都曾专程赴德，后来该疗法才被引进至加州圣莫尼卡的诊所。 Rogan 调出资料让制作人 Jamie 查证，详细阐述了 Regenokine 的医疗原理：该技术由德国医生 Peter Wehling 开创，主要目标是阻断体内一种名为白细胞介素-1（Interleukin-1, IL-1）的致炎蛋白。医生抽取患者自身的血液后，将其加热到人体体温，刺激生成天然的抗炎蛋白（IL-1 受体拮抗剂），随后在离心机中进行长时间离心分离，提取出富含保护性蛋白的血清，最后直接注射到受损的椎间盘或关节组织周围。Rogan 表示自己曾因颈椎问题导致手指发麻，而在接受该疗法后几周内就获得了极大的缓解，不仅彻底解决了神经压迫症状，还成功治愈了自己多年的膝盖和腰背顽疾。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Regenokine Treatment Process accDescr: A flowchart depicting the step-by-step process of the Regenokine therapy explained by Joe Rogan. subgraph Prep ["血液提取与诱导"] A["抽取患者自体静脉血液"] B["加热至人体体温 诱导产生天然抗炎蛋白 (IL-1Ra)"] A --> B end subgraph Process ["离心与分离"] C["长时间离心处理 (Centrifuge)"] D["分离出高浓度抗炎血清"] B --> C C --> D end subgraph Injection ["靶向注射与康复"] E["注射至受损椎间盘或关节周围"] F["阻断白细胞介素-1 (IL-1) 数周内消炎并消除神经麻木"] D --> E E --> F end ``` - **核心研发者**：德国医师 Peter Wehling。 - **作用机制**：通过体外孵育血液产生高浓度 IL-1 拮抗蛋白，精准抑制关节和脊柱损伤区域的炎症风暴。 - **名人体检背书**：Kobe Bryant、Peyton Manning、Dana White 均曾飞往德国施打该疗法。 --- ### [01:19:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=4774s) 脊柱减压器械与椎间盘修复前沿（水凝胶与干细胞）除了生物消炎注射，Rogan 还强调了物理“减压”（Decompression）在日常重训和保养中的极端重要性。不论是深蹲还是硬拉，大重量训练都会对脊柱造成巨大的垂直压迫，必须通过拉伸反向释放压力。Rogan 透露自己每天都会使用一套挂在引体向上杆上的下巴悬挂挽具来牵引颈椎，完全依靠自身体重下坠给颈椎创造间隙；针对腰椎，他强烈推荐 Teeter 公司生产的 Dex 2（或 Dex 3）前屈减压器。与普通倒吊机不同，该器械让身体直接从髋部向前弯折悬垂，双腿无需承受固定受力，能清晰感受到腰椎节节拉开并发出“啪啪”的复位声。在椎间盘修复的最新前沿方面，Rogan 指出现代医学正逐步摆脱“只切不补”的困境： 1. **水凝胶注射（Hydrogel Injections）**：直接向退化萎缩的椎间盘内部注入仿生水凝胶，填充流失的间质，目前正处于临床实验阶段。 2. **椎间盘内干细胞注射**：位于墨西哥蒂华纳的细胞性能研究所（Cellular Performance Institute, CPI）正开展将干细胞精准打入椎间盘内的治疗，促进纤维环和髓核组织再生变厚。Rogan 举例他的好友、大浪冲浪兼弓猎手 Shane Dorian 赴该机构治疗后，短短两三个月内活动度提升了 30% 到 40%，疼痛大幅减轻。两人指出，无论是切除手术还是干细胞修复，术后恢复期都必须保持至少 6 周的克制，期间绝对不能负重，只能散步休养，给组织充分的愈合生长时间。 - **Dex 减压椅机制**：锁定骨盆与大腿，让上半身受重力自然下垂，消除下肢牵扯，实现腰椎单纯减压。 - **椎间盘修复挑战**：软骨与椎间盘缺乏直达血管，干细胞注入后必须避免二次劳损，确保细胞存活与基质分泌。 --- ### [01:22:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=4932s) 脊柱剧痛、阿片类药物陷阱与萨克勒家族的罪恶谈话随后转向背痛引发的深远人生悲剧。Sheridan 语气沉重地透露，自己的继父正是间接死于背痛——当年继父在怀俄明州钓鱼时痛到无法支撑，随后去做了脊柱手术，但手术非但没有治愈反而让病情恶化，陷入持续的剧痛之中。为了止痛，继父不得不开始服用奥施康定（OxyContin），从此跌入阿片类处方药成瘾的深渊，健康与生命随之走向终结。Rogan 感同身受地表示，一旦脊柱手术失败并依赖上强效止痛药，患者的生命就像被按下了倒计时，“你能撑的时间真的非常有限”。两人怒斥了美国医药体制当年肆无忌惮滥开阿片类药物的黑幕。Rogan 提到了由 Peter Berg 执导的 Netflix 剧集《无痛杀手》（*Painkiller*），盛赞 Matthew Broderick 将制药巨头普渡制药（Purdue Pharma）的萨克勒（Sackler）家族掌门人刻画得入木三分。正是这个家族为了赚取数百亿美元的暴利，隐瞒成瘾性并疯狂推销阿片类药物，直接引爆了席卷全美的处方药滥用危机。他们愤慨地指出，成千上万的家庭因药物成瘾而破碎，无数孩子在吸毒成瘾的父母阴影下长大，承受着代际传递的创伤，而萨克勒家族的幕后黑手们不仅免于牢狱之灾，至今依然能在高级乡村俱乐部里悠闲地吃着龙虾享受特权，堪称社会体制的莫大讽刺。 - **手术后遗症与药物链条**：失败的脊椎侵入性手术往往是导致病患长期依赖 OxyContin 等强效麻醉镇痛剂的开端。 - **影视与现实映射**：Netflix 剧集《无痛杀手》（*Painkiller*）揭露了普渡制药与萨克勒家族系统性制造阿片类成瘾危机的罪证。 - **代际创伤（Generational Damage）**：药物危机不仅杀死了服药者本人，更通过家庭功能瓦解对下一代造成不可逆的精神与心理摧残。 ### [01:24:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5058s) 阿片类药物危机与真正的“人间恶魔” 乔·罗根与泰勒·谢里丹谈到世界上真正纯粹的邪恶。罗根感叹，许多人总以为恶魔只存在于地狱中，但实际上恶魔就行走在人世间。这些人在现实中制造巨大的痛苦与灾难，却能通过周遭同样唯利是图的圈子将恶行合理化，只要能赚取暴利，就可以对任何苦难视而不见。阿片类药物泛滥正是这种恶行的典型代表，它更成为了芬太尼泛滥的敲门砖。谢里丹描述了当年佛罗里达州盛行的“疼痛管理中心”（即臭名昭著的药丸作坊 Pill Mills）。患者走进诊所抱怨身体疼痛，医生就会像熟络地打招呼一样说“我们隔壁就有解决方案”；然而一走到隔壁药房，那里根本不卖奔肌软膏（Ben-Gay）或牙刷等日常用品，货架上除了奥施康定（OxyContin）一无所有。罗根直言这才是真正的毒品交易，相比之下，毒枭集团在这场数万亿美元的医药黑幕中甚至只能算是在分食残羹剩饭。罗根回忆道，十五年前大众根本对芬太尼一无所知，直到在播客上看到致死剂量的芬太尼放在一枚一分硬币旁对比时才惊觉其恐怖程度——极其微小的一撮就能致命，而如今它被掺入可卡因等各种毒品中，导致费城等各大城市的街头到处都是弯腰如行尸走肉般的吸毒者。 - **药丸作坊乱象**：佛罗里达州当年的疼痛诊所与自营药房无缝串联，诊疗完全沦为批量开具高纯度奥施康定的工具。 - **芬太尼致命剂量**：致死量仅需微克级别，对比一枚一分钱硬币的体积微乎其微，如今却泛滥于全美街头。 --- ### [01:26:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5179s) 伊博格碱（Ibogaine）：戒断成瘾与脑神经修复的革命性疗法针对严重的药物成瘾与退伍军人创伤，罗根提到了由得克萨斯州前州长里克·佩里（Rick Perry）和得州参议员布赖恩·休斯（Bryan Hughes）推动的“伊博格碱倡议”。罗根甚至曾亲自前往白宫向唐纳德·特朗普游说，争取将其纳入“尝试权”（Right to Try）法案，为退伍军人及成瘾患者合法使用铺平道路。伊博格碱提取自非洲的二裂帽柱木（Tabernanthe iboga），是一种极其强效且完全没有娱乐性质的精神活性物质。罗根强调，使用伊博格碱绝非为了寻求刺激或快感，使用者通常要经历长达24小时极度痛苦的致幻体验，它会像放电影一样强迫人回顾一生中伤害过他人的所有阴暗面，并以奇特的方式重新链接大脑回路，一次疗程便能让大量患者彻底戒断酒精、可卡因或赌瘾。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 伊博格碱疗法的作用路径 accDescr: 展示伊博格碱从摄入到生理、心理与神经重塑的过程 subgraph Phase1["体验阶段（约24小时）"] A["摄入伊博格碱单次/多次剂量"] --> B["剧烈躯体反应（呕吐、腹泻等）"] B --> C["心理全景回放（审视过往创伤与过失）"] end subgraph Phase2["治疗结果与脑神经重塑"] C --> D["成瘾神经回路重置（戒断烟酒与毒品）"] C --> E["PTSD创伤平复（退伍军人心理重建）"] D --> F["脑组织神经再生（逆转大脑萎缩）"] E --> F end ``` 罗根进一步透露了里克·佩里的亲身经历：佩里原是坚决反毒品的保守派政客，在亲自尝试并见证众多老兵的转变后，将其视作余生的核心使命。佩里在73岁体检时显示有正常的年龄相关性脑萎缩，但在接受伊博格碱治疗后不久复检，医生惊愕地发现其脑萎缩程度减少了25%；六个月后再检，脑萎缩痕迹竟然全部消失，证明该成分具有惊人的神经再生作用。尽管大型制药公司极力阻挠此类无法持续收割利润的疗法，但特朗普当时对此持开放态度并迅速签署支持。退伍军人如《红翼行动》原型马库斯·勒特雷尔（Marcus Luttrell）、达科他·迈耶（Dakota Meyer）以及肖恩·瑞安（Sean Ryan）等人，在远赴墨西哥或哥斯达黎加完成治疗后成功摆脱酗酒与严重PTSD，彻底改变了保守派群体对这类疗法的认知。 - **极度严苛的心理体验**：伊博格碱会引发剧烈呕吐与腹泻，并迫使患者从受害者的视角反思自己曾经犯下的所有伤害，过程极其沉重阴暗。 - **里克·佩里脑部逆龄数据**：73岁接受脑扫描显示退行性萎缩，体验伊博格碱后初检萎缩减少25%，半年后脑萎缩完全逆转消失。 - **老兵成功案例**：包括马库斯·勒特雷尔（Marcus Luttrell）、达科他·迈耶（Dakota Meyer）等在内的诸多海豹突击队与特战退伍军人借此治愈了严重的酗酒和心理创伤。 --- ### [01:30:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5424s) 虚伪的非营利慈善与“流浪汉工业复合体” 罗根与谢里丹随后将矛头对准了围绕流浪汉问题滋生的“非营利慈善产业”。罗根感叹，当今大多数非营利机构实质上就是赤裸裸的骗局。如果能将流浪汉集中引入伊博格碱戒断中心，或许是拯救危机的一条出路，但现实是既得利益者根本不希望危机结束。在洛杉矶等城市，负责流浪汉项目的非营利机构高管拿着极其丰厚的高薪，他们给流浪汉发放针头和iPhone，实质上是在吸附社会危机牟利。谢里丹将这群人犀利地定义为“表演型创业者”（Performative Entrepreneurs）：他们先凭空包装或利用一个社会痛点，然后向政府兜售一套看似充满关怀的官僚解决方案来骗取巨额公帑。这些机构的核心商业逻辑在于“绝不真正解决问题”，因为一旦问题彻底解决，资金链就会断裂；若不小心解决了，他们便会迅速物色下一个社会矛盾继续敛财。 - **非营利高管红利**：各大城市流浪汉救助主管薪资高昂，解决流浪汉问题的动力远低于维持现状以持续申请预算的动力。 - **表演型创业本质**：以慈善之名向纳税人和政府索要巨款，通过提供治标不治本的物资维持底层依赖，形成恶性循环的游说产业链。 --- ### [01:31:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5512s) 《黄石》的社会共鸣：重归土地、纯粹劳动与野外生活谈及对现代社会虚伪与政治谎言的厌恶，罗根指出这正是谢里丹主创的剧集《黄石》（Yellowstone）能够引发全美强烈共鸣的深层原因。大众早已对日常被强行灌输的政治口水仗、官僚欺诈与虚无的城市生活感到厌倦，人们在《黄石》中看到了一群以艰苦体力劳动为荣、并能从中获得深层灵魂满足的群体。在星空下拉开睡袋入睡、将骏马拴在树旁、围在篝火边与挚友烤肉大笑，是现代人内心深处真正渴望的原生态生活。罗根感慨，虽然荒野生存与牧场劳作绝不轻松甚至充满艰辛，但它的本质是纯粹的，没有任何虚情假意的废话。谢里丹对此深表赞同，并以户外弓猎（Bowhunting）为例指出，真正的户外生活本身就是一场严肃而完整的磨砺：在真正出发之前，你必须经过长时间严苛的射术练习与物资筹备，随后背负重装徒步深入无人之境，亲手扎下营地；在狩猎行动正式展开前，每一步琐碎的劳作都在锤炼人的意志与专注力。 ### [01:33:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5591s) 亲手劳作的奖赏：赫尔佐格《幸福的人们》与西伯利亚猎人泰勒·谢里丹（Taylor Sheridan）谈到，在牧场生活中，完成一件事情本身就是最大的奖赏，尤其是所有事情都亲力亲为、靠双手搞定。这也是为什么这种粗犷的生活方式对人们有着巨大的吸引力。他提到，自己牧场里甚至有第三代牛仔，专门去大学攻读了牧场管理学位，毕业后却心甘情愿回到牧场拿着每月 3,000 美元的薪水，而且“开心得不得了”。乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）对此深表共鸣，感慨人类内心深处真正向往的生活往往出人意料。他提到了著名导演沃纳·赫尔佐格（Werner Herzog）的纪录片《幸福的人们：泰加林的一年》（*Happy People: A Year in the Taiga*）。该片记录了西伯利亚泰加林中沿河而居的原住民猎人，这些人除了打猎、捕兽和钓鱼别无其他谋生手段。他们骑着雪地摩托，猎犬紧跟其后并协助捕猎；大家聚在一起开怀大笑、喝酒作乐。罗根感叹，这群人不仅完全没有现代人的心理疾病，而且在接受俄语采访时自然流露出的态度仿佛在说：“这才是人类原本该有的生活方式，这才是真正的生活。” - 现代牧场中受过高等教育的牛仔每月仅拿约 3,000 美元薪酬，却对生活感到极其满足。 - 赫尔佐格纪录片中的泰加林捕兽者展现了完全自给自足的原生态生活，没有任何现代心理焦虑。 --- ### [01:34:31](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5671s) 荒野独居的极致：迪克·普罗内克与阿拉斯加生存法则谢里丹和罗根随后聊起了独自隐居阿拉斯加的传奇人物迪克·普罗内克（Richard "Dick" Proenneke）。普罗内克在 51 岁那年毅然放弃了每周工作 50 小时的枯燥现代生活，搬到阿拉斯加克拉克湖国家公园（Lake Clark National Park）的双子湖（Twin Lakes）区域。他在荒野中亲手砍伐树木、搭建木屋、自制所有工具、打猎捕鱼、种植土豆，并用一台 Super 8 摄影机完整记录了这一切。普罗内克在那里一直独自生活了三十多年，直到八十多岁实在无法熬过严酷的寒冬才搬回山下。罗根表示，普罗内克这种极致的自力更生极其迷人，但也令人好奇他如何忍受无边无际的孤独。对于罗根自己而言，长期脱离人群会“彻底发疯”，但与荒野的直接互动仿佛深深烙印在人类的 DNA 之中。谈到阿拉斯加的气候与人文，罗根调侃当地冬天虽然难熬得要命，但当地人却坚韧非凡。他讲起在安克雷奇酒吧听到的趣闻：有个家伙在镇上冲着一头驼鹿扔雪球，结果被活活踩死。罗根打趣说，在阿拉斯加你必须随时提防走在自动取款机前都有可能被巨兽踩死，千万别冲着一千多磅重的庞然大物扔雪球，特别是带着幼崽的母驼鹿，发起飙来绝对会致命。 - 普罗内克在 51 岁时建好木屋，在荒野中独立生活超过 30 年，自制木工用具并自行种植与捕猎。 - 隐居地位于阿拉斯加克拉克湖国家公园的双子湖。 - 极端自然环境塑造了阿拉斯加人坚韧强悍的性格与敬畏自然的本能。 --- ### [01:37:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5874s) 北极边缘的守望者：海莫·科斯与 Vice 早期探险报道罗根接着提到了另一位常年生活在北极圈附近的传奇人物海莫·科斯（Heimo Korth）。早期 Vice 的旅行专栏（*Vice Guide to Travel*）曾制作过一部名为《海莫的北极避难所》（*Heimo's Arctic Refuge*）的纪实影片。海莫从 20 世纪 70 年代起就隐居在木屋中，过着与世隔绝的生活，他甚至是在“9·11”事件发生数年之后才从一张旧照片上得知这起悲剧。后来他与妻子埃德娜（Edna）还参与了纪录片节目《最后的阿拉斯加人》（*The Last Alaskans*）。罗根特别赞赏 Vice 早期的硬核调查报道风格。当时制作组派了一位戴着眼镜、看起来书生气十足甚至格格不入的年轻记者飞赴极地，深入荒原与海莫同吃同住了一周。海莫在极地零度以下的环境中将捕获的驯鹿肉直接挂在户外当天然冷库，吃饭时就用锯子锯下一块冻肉排，放在木火烤架上煎熟。在拍摄期间，甚至有一只灰熊试图偷吃海莫的驯鹿存货，海莫不得不开枪将其击毙。由于属于国家野生动物保护区设立前的既有居民（Grandfathered in），海莫成为了极少数合法留驻在这片土地上的人之一，其木屋上至今贴着官方许可。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 荒野隐居者的生存模式与现代对照 accDescr: 对比现代社会的异化生活与泰加林及阿拉斯加荒野隐居者的自给自足与快乐源泉 subgraph Modern["现代社会与心理困境"] A["每周50小时高压工时"] --> B["与生产物及自然脱节"] B --> C["普遍的焦虑与心理疾病"] end subgraph Wilderness["荒野自力更生模式"] D["亲手劳作与工具自制"] --> E["直接获取食物（捕鱼、打猎、储存）"] E --> F["完成生存任务即获得即时多巴胺反馈"] F --> G["符合人类基因本能，内心充实满足"] end Modern -. 对比反思.-> Wilderness ``` --- ### [01:41:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=6106s) 基因本能与人类文明史的重估看着纪录片中极度适应冰原的海莫，罗根和谢里丹探讨了这种生活为何能带给人难以言喻的幸福感。谢里丹认为，这完全写在人类的大脑回路中——我们生来就是为了与自然共存。罗根赞同道，现代人的生理与心理构造本质上依然是“狩猎采集者”（Hunter-gatherers），我们的 DNA 与数万年前的祖先没有任何区别。相比漫长的演化史，现代城市生活只存在了极短的时间。谈到人类从定居转向城市的历史节点，两人讨论了学术界通常认为城市出现于约一万年前的传统观点。罗根指出，近年来考古学界对文明起源时间的看法正在发生根本性动摇。最典型的例子便是土耳其的哥贝克力石阵（Göbekli Tepe）。这处巨大的石构建筑群距今已有约 11,800 年的历史，而且在古代被整体掩埋。它最初是在 20 世纪 90 年代由一名当地牧羊人偶然发现——当时牧羊人的靴子踢到了一块露在地面上的怪异巨石，从而掀开了颠覆整个人类文明认知史的重大考古篇章。 - 人类的大脑和生理构造依然停留在几十万年狩猎采集时期的演化状态。 - 土耳其哥贝克力石阵拥有约 11,800 年历史，推翻了人类先有农业城市再有大型宗教建筑的传统考古模型。 ### [01:42:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=6162s) 远古遗迹的谜团与考古学界的范式执念乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）与泰勒·谢里丹（Taylor Sheridan）谈到了土耳其的哥贝克力石阵（Göbekli Tepe）。当初人们清理掉表层泥土并引来考古学家后，挖掘出了规模宏大的建筑群——巨大的同心石柱圈，上面雕刻着高浮雕的三维动物图案。更令人震惊的是，地质碳定年法显示整个遗迹在大约 11,000 多年前被人工刻意掩埋。罗根感叹这彻底颠覆了人类认知：“这到底是个什么玩意儿？”当时的人类甚至连农业文明都尚未确立，人们争论这究竟是某种天文日历、对重大事件的标记，还是记录了大洪水的发生。罗根指出，这类遗迹的发现让许多墨守成规的学者感到极其不适，因为主流考古学家非常抗拒推翻已有的既定理论。谢里丹补充道，考古学家的终身成就与学术地位往往直接捆绑在某项特定发现上。比如早期发现了克洛维斯石器（Clovis point），整个学界就以此为基准来测定所有北美人类活动的年代；任何更新、更早的发现，都会让这批学者一辈子的研究成果瞬间贬值，因而引发本能的学术排斥。 - 哥贝克力石阵拥有巨大的环状石柱群与三维立体动物浮雕，在 11,000 多年前被整体人工掩埋。 - 学术界的“克洛维斯第一”（Clovis First）假设曾长期垄断北美人类迁徙史，任何推翻既有年代的证据都会遭到体制性抵制。 --- ### [01:43:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=6226s) 多人种共存的演化史与化石形成的极端罕见性罗根提到，过去的教材总把人类演化描绘成一条从直立人（Homo erectus）平滑过渡到智人（Homo sapiens）的线性逻辑链条，但如今的科学证据表明，历史上至少有四到五种不同的人种在同一时期并存生活在地球上，包括丹尼索瓦人（Denisovans）以及在中国发现的“大头”古人类（如龙人）。然而，我们对这一切的认知严重受制于化石证据的稀缺。化石的形成条件极为苛刻，绝大多数生物死亡后，其骨骼在一百年内就会彻底风化分解消失殆尽。谢里丹赞同地表示，整个人类学和古生物学其实都建立在“极不完整的零星碎片”之上。罗根进一步延伸到恐龙：恐龙在地球上繁衍了数亿年，诞生过难以计数的物种，但人类迄今挖掘出的恐龙骨骼数量极其有限。如果动物死后没有恰好掉进沥青坑、被火山灰包裹或陷入泥浆深渊，就根本不可能留存为化石，这意味着大量曾经主宰地球的恐龙种类早已彻底消失在时间的长河中。 --- ### [01:45:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=6314s) 德克萨斯恐龙谷与大自然清扫残骸的法则两人的话题转向了位于德克萨斯州格伦罗斯（Glen Rose）的恐龙谷州立公园（Dinosaur Valley State Park）。屏幕上展示出一排极其清晰的巨大三趾恐龙足迹，足足有 1.13 亿年的历史。谢里丹惊叹道，当时踩进泥潭里的庞然大物究竟有多重，才能将脚印深深刻入日后凝固成花岗岩般的硬质岩层中。这些足迹原本一直深埋在帕卢克西河（Paluxy River）的河底，直到近年遭遇严重干旱导致河床干涸，这批属于高棘龙（Acrocanthosaurus）等恐龙的古老印痕才重新暴露于世。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 恐龙足迹的形成与重现过程 accDescr: 展示1.13亿年前恐龙在泥泞河滩留下脚印到现代因干旱重新显露的地质演变路径。 subgraph Formation["白垩纪形成阶段"] A["恐龙在火山灰与泥浆混合层行走"] --> B["巨大体重留下深重脚印"] B --> C["迅速被沉积物掩埋硬化成岩"] end subgraph Concealment["漫长掩埋阶段"] C --> D["深埋于德州帕卢克西河床之下"] end subgraph Discovery["现代重见天日"] D --> E["极端严重干旱导致河水干涸"] E --> F["1.13亿年前足迹重现世间"] end ``` 罗根感叹这种纯粹的偶然性，并指出恐龙脚印之所以震撼，在于人们甚至根本没能找到那只恐龙本身的骨骼。谢里丹作为常年打猎的人对此深有体会：在荒野中，你几乎永远不可能捡到自然死亡的美洲狮骨架，因为大自然拥有一套极其高效的清理系统——啮齿类动物会迅速啃食骨头摄取钙质，各种食腐动物与微生物会在极短时间内把尸骸消化得一干二净。如果没有特殊地质事件将骨骼迅速隔绝保护起来，绝大部分动物死去后都只会化为泥土，根本不会变成化石。 - 德克萨斯州格伦罗斯恐龙谷的足迹形成于 1.13 亿年前，据推测属于双足肉食性高棘龙（Acrocanthosaurus）等恐龙。 - 荒野生态系统的清道夫（如老鼠、昆虫等）能在几年内彻底分解骨骼，这也是自然界极难偶遇野生捕食者遗骸的原因。 --- ### [01:47:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=6457s) 历史时钟的不断倒拨与人类美洲起源的新认知两人看着历史照片，发现早在 1908 年，当地一名学童就首次发现了这些脚印。罗根调侃道，如果那个小孩在 1910 年代跑回家告诉父母自己发现了三趾巨蜥的脚印，当时的小镇居民根本无法想象这是什么生物，甚至得拉着全镇人跑到河滩围观。直到 19 世纪中叶，恐龙的概念才刚刚建立，而科学界最早记录的恐龙骨骼甚至在 1677 年被误认为属于某种“史前巨人”。罗根指出，随着现代考古新发现不断涌现，人类对地球历史的认识从来没有“变年轻过”，而是一次又一次被推向更古老的过去。例如在摩洛哥等地发现的解剖学现代智人遗骸，将智人的起源时间直接前推了三四十万年；过去教科书笃定第一批美洲原住民是在 12,000 到 14,000 年前通过白令陆桥（Bering Land Bridge）进入美洲，但新墨西哥州白沙国家公园（White Sands）发现的人类足迹经测定距今已有 22,000 年之久，整个人类迁徙的时间线被彻底改写。 --- ### [01:49:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=6594s) 牧场拾获的古老箭镞与远古工具的奥秘罗根询问谢里丹在自己的德州牧场上是否经常捡到印第安原住民的箭镞和石器。谢里丹回答说，在他从小长大的那个牧场上，“每次下大雨之后，到处都能找到这些石镞”。他回忆道，母亲曾经把捡到的一大批石器送到沃斯堡（Fort Worth）的博物馆进行专业断代。专家一眼就能根据不同的打制风格和形制分辨出年代跨度，指着这枚说是 2,200 年前的，另一枚则是 4,000 年前、人类技术出现某种革新时期的遗物。随后，罗根拿出了一枚朋友在其牧场上找到的巨大石矛头，并分享了自己在内华达州高地沙漠猎鹿时意外捡到精美小箭镞的经历：“你低头一看，心里会想，天哪，这是几百甚至几千年前某个人射向鹿的一箭。”针对录音室里展示的那枚尺寸极大的石镞，罗根提到狩猎专家雷米·沃伦（Remi Warren）曾分析它很可能是用来叉鱼或刺鱼的；因为在弓箭技术不成熟、磅数很低的远古时代，如果用来猎兽，过于宽大的石刃反而会严重削弱穿透深度，只有特殊的捕食场景才会打造如此宽大的器刃。 - 谢里丹母亲在德州牧场收集的石镞经沃斯堡博物馆鉴定，年代横跨 2,200 年至 4,000 年不等。 - 历史上首个被科学记载的恐龙化石描述于 1677 年（曾被误认为是巨人的股骨末端）。 - 猎人雷米·沃伦（Remi Warren）推测，过宽过大的古老石质尖头通常并非低磅数弓箭的弹头，而更可能是用于叉鱼的专用工具。 ### [01:51:36](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=6696s) 远古箭头与德州牧场的考古遗存两人围绕史前箭头的形制与功用展开探讨。泰勒·谢里丹（Taylor Sheridan）解释说，那种较宽大的尖头并不是装在矛上的，而是用于射鱼的箭头，因为击穿鱼肉比穿透野牛的肋骨容易得多；面对体型庞大且有肋骨防护的野牛，原住民会使用小得多、穿透力更强的尖头。乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）感叹，在既没有互联网也没有书籍的远古时代，人类仅凭敲打燧石（flintknapping）和使用兽筋就能制作出如此精密的武器，甚至还能在飞驰的马背上熟练拉弓射击，这展现了令人惊叹的生存智慧。谈到在德州牧场成长的童年经历，谢里丹回忆起自家土地上数不胜数的历史遗存。每当大雨过后，地表泥土被冲刷，他和家人只要沿着通往屋后半英里处蓄水池（stock tank）的小路散步，随手就能捡起四五个箭头。他的母亲甚至专门用一个巨大的柳条筐来盛放捡到的箭头，整个篮子被塞得满满当当。其中一些箭头的历史可以追溯到数千年前，这让他时常感慨：究竟有多少代人在那片土地上繁衍生息、交易或发生战事？制作一枚优质箭头需要耗费数小时的心血，通常猎手射出一箭后都会竭力寻回，而地表遗留的庞大数量意味着营地里必然有专人日复一日地打磨箭头与弓弦——或许是部落里年老体衰、无法再奔跑狩猎的长者，退居营地承担起专职武器工匠的职责。 - **射鱼与猎兽箭头的区别**：较宽的箭头多用于射鱼；体型较小且利于深层穿透的尖头则用于猎杀野牛等骨骼粗壮的大型猎物。 - **牧场寻宝经历**：谢里丹母亲拥有一个装满箭头的柳条筐；每次暴雨后，在通往蓄水池的半英里土路上随处可拾得四五枚数千年前的箭头。 - **原始分工推测**：部族很可能存在明确的劳动分工，年长体弱无法参与高强度狩猎的成员专职制作弓箭，换取年轻猎手带回的猎物。 --- ### [01:54:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=6846s) 真实还原开拓史：《1883》背后的家族日记与残酷迁徙乔·罗根赞叹谢里丹编剧并执导的《黄石》前传剧集《1883》（对谈中罗根口误提为 1823），认为它是影视史上极具震撼力、最真实再现当年横跨大陆艰辛历程的作品之一——细腻刻画了文明都市人踏入蛮荒西部时所面临的极端现实。谢里丹透露，该剧的考据不仅基于大量历史文献，更源于他家族的真实记录。他的曾曾祖母在 1840 年代跟随家族从肯塔基州迁徙至德克萨斯州，并留下了一本详尽的私人日记。通过研读先辈日记以及同期出版的历史记录，谢里丹还原出那段被浪漫化滤镜掩盖的残酷历史。谢里丹指出，当年最令拓荒者魂飞魄散的危险并非凶猛野兽，而是渡河。在那个时代，绝大多数人完全不会游泳，湍急的河水随时能吞噬整支车队。19 世纪中叶，大量来自德国以及中欧的移民在纽奥良港或加尔维斯顿（Galveston）登陆。他们听信了欧洲当地旅行社所谓的“免费土地”承诺，在未踏出家门前就预付了整趟行程的向导、马匹骡子和大篷车费用。这些移民原本大多是城镇手工业者或农民，许多人这辈子从未骑过马，更未开过枪。他们之所以大多计划前往俄勒冈，是因为当地的气候植被与中欧最为相似。然而现实无比冰冷，很多人由于中暑、疾病、甚至还没走出德州境内的韦科（Waco）或沃斯堡（Fort Worth），就已客死他乡。到了 1880 年代，虽然原住民冲突已不再是主要威胁，但由于西部完全处于法律真空状态，亡命之徒和劫匪四处横行。那些缺乏经验的移民队伍，在心狠手辣、伏击多年的匪帮眼里无异于待宰羔羊。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 19世纪欧洲移民西进路线与致死危机 accDescr: 展示了欧洲移民从启程到登陆德州加尔维斯顿，再到沿途面临的自然与人为致命危险的流程图。 subgraph Origin["欧洲启程阶段"] A["中欧/德国移民家庭"] --> B["欧洲旅行社购买全包套餐 (承诺西南部免费土地)"] end subgraph Entry["抵达美洲大陆"] B --> C["加尔维斯顿 / 纽奥良港登陆"] C --> D["组建大篷车队与雇佣向导 (多数人从未骑马或开枪)"] end subgraph Hazards["横跨荒原之致命威胁"] D --> E["自然环境危机"] D --> F["社会治安危机"] E --> G["致命渡河 (几乎全员溺水盲区)"] E --> H["日晒脱水、疾病与迷路"] F --> I["荒野匪帮劫杀 (毫无执法保护)"] end ``` - **剧集创作背景**：依托谢里丹家族 1840 年代从肯塔基迁至德州的曾曾祖母日记，结合多部未公开发表或早期出版的移民日记。 - **欧洲移民潮真相**：多数中欧移民（尤其是德裔）未出发前就在本土旅行社买好了全套路线套餐，怀揣对“俄勒冈沃土”的憧憬登船，却对荒野生存技能一无所知。 - **西进路上的主要死因**：渡河溺水居首，其次为日晒失水、霍乱等传染病，以及毫无秩序保护下的路匪洗劫。 --- ### [01:57:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7057s) 荒野迷途、逆时针转圈偏见与大自然的冷酷在缺乏经验丰富向导的情况下踏入大平原（Great Plains），后果通常是毁灭性的。平原一望无际，缺乏显眼的地标，如果不懂得通过太阳来判定方位，迷失方向的人往往会陷入不断绕圈的怪圈，直至水源耗尽。罗根提到他最近读到的一项研究：人类在树林或荒野中迷路时，无论习惯使用左手还是右手，几乎无一例外都会以“逆时针”（counterclockwise）方向打转。这篇科普文章甚至建议，一旦确认自己迷失且在原路返回，应刻意向右修正行进路线。 ```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: 人类荒野迷途逆时针绕圈成因 accDescr: 展示了人类在无外部参照物时，因微小平衡误差累积导致逆时针绕圈的生理机制。 subgraph Perception["参照物缺失"] A["缺乏外部地标 / 太阳指示"] --> B["完全依赖内部直觉直行"] end subgraph Physiological["生物力学累积"] B --> C["双腿与平衡系统存在微小不对称误差"] C --> D["固有左转偏见累积放大"] end subgraph Outcome["最终结果"] D --> E["轨迹形成巨大闭合圆环 (逆时针闭环)"] end ``` 为了验证这一说法，罗根让助理在 AI 工具 Perplexity 上进行检索。查询结果证实，当人被蒙上双眼或置身于没有太阳、远山等参照物的环境中时，身体内部平衡感反馈的细微微小随机误差会不断累加；同时人类具有一种原因尚不明确的本能“微小左偏倾向”（subtle left turn bias），这使得直行的意图最终在地面上被画成巨大的环形轨迹。研究甚至在 COVID 疫情期间的行人社交距离追踪中发现，各国步行者也普遍存在偏好逆时针移动的潜意识行为，且这种偏好属于纯粹的个体生物学特征，而非群体跟随效应。谢里丹坦言，他自幼在荒野中长大，完全无法理解现代人为什么会“迷路”，因为只要懂得利用清晨日出的朝向，就能轻松推断出东、西、南、北四个基本方位。然而罗根指出，绝大多数久居温室的现代人根本不具备任何野外常识。一旦被孤立在密林深处，强烈的恐慌感便会瞬间吞噬理智。在这片残酷的自然界中，最令人绝望的现实在于：大自然本身对任何生命的生与死都彻底漠不关心。 - **逆时针转圈现象**：实地与实验室盲行实验显示，人类在失去外部地标（如太阳或地貌特征）后，因平衡反馈系统细微误差的单向累积，会自发沿逆时针方向闭合成环。 - **个体生物学机制**：AI 检索资料指出，这种左倾行进偏见属于每个个体自带的生物力学特征，甚至在日常步行及疫情人流统计中都有所体现。 - **大自然的残酷法则**：置身荒野的最大恐怖在于恐慌带来的理智崩溃，而自然法则对拓荒者或迷路者的生存与毁灭“毫不在乎”（doesn't give a fuck）。 ### [02:01:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7274s) 大自然的冷酷法则与拓荒者的真实日记乔·罗根与泰勒·谢里丹谈到荒野与大自然时，感叹自然本身完全无情且冷酷，对人类生存的渴望毫无兴趣，这种漠不关心反而构成了它的独特之美——尤其是对于那些自视甚高的人来说，一旦真正置身于荒原，就会立刻清醒地意识到“自己其实微不足道”（"Oh, I ain't shit"），大自然随时都在考验人类的极限。随后话题转向谢里丹在创作西部题材剧集（如《1883》与《1923》）时的历史考据。罗根好奇他是否考虑过将自己高祖母当年留下的日记手稿发到网上供公众阅读。谢里丹坦言从未想过，因为市面上已有大量出版的同类日记。在那些泛黄的记录里，其实并没有电影般跌宕起伏的冲突或惊心动魄的部落袭击，通篇写满的都是艰难而平淡的日常：天气极度寒冷、晚饭吃了莫名其妙难以下咽的食物、某个人举止粗鲁无礼、车队在一处优美的山谷歇脚、渡河时水流湍急让人担惊受怕。这种未遭遇惨烈劫难的平凡反而是莫大的幸运，而日记真正令人惊叹的地方，在于哪怕是一百多年前的普通人，字里行间的文笔也极其优美典雅。 ### [02:02:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7360s) 遗失的书信艺术与“未付出努力”的现代捷径两人对过去几个世纪普通人非凡的文字功底深有感触。无论是南北战争时期的家书，还是二战士兵寄回后方的信件，文辞修养都高得惊人。谢里丹提到自己珍藏着外祖父在二战期间写给外祖母的全部情书：外祖父于1941年参军，成为一名轰炸机飞行员，那些年间寄回的信件字字深情、文采斐然，开头常写着“我的至爱”（"My beloved"），展现出令人动容的文雅与庄重。罗根对比现代人的表达能力，认为当代普通人遣词造句的能力正在急剧退化。过去的人如果听说未来每个人口袋里都装着一个带手电筒功能的小设备，随时能向它提问并瞬间得到天下所有答案，一定会以为未来的人人都是天才。然而现实却截然相反——人们反而退化了，因为所有获取知识的繁重工作都被机器代劳，人们轻而易举拿到了“未经自己付出辛劳赚取”（unearned）的现成答案。正如十九世纪的人们往往每天或每周专门腾出一到三个小时专注于伏案写信，信使与骑马送信的邮差在当时是维系人类文明情感最重要的纽带。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 19世纪书信时代与现代即时搜索的认知对比 accDescr: 对比19世纪投入大量时间书写沟通与现代依赖便携设备获取现成答案的区别 subgraph Past ["19世纪与20世纪初期：深度表达"] A["每日投入1-3小时伏案书写"] --> B["精雕细琢的文辞与深刻情感"] B --> C["漫长等待信使送达 付出精力获得共鸣"] end subgraph Present ["现代数字时代：即时获取"] D["便携移动设备随时检索"] --> E["机器代劳所有学习与思考过程"] E --> F["未经努力换取现成答案 表达与思维能力逐渐退化"] end ``` - **历史书信习惯**：19世纪的人们通常一次连续写作1至3小时，书信往来频繁的人几乎每天都要耗费数小时处理信件，其严谨程度堪比现代人的专注工作模块。 - **时代反差**：技术赋予了人类无限的答案，却剥夺了人类为了理解事物而必须经历的苦思与磨砺过程。 ### [02:05:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7518s) 《母狮》的政治预言与《1923》的野蛮交错当罗根问及在撰写不同类型剧集（如情报惊悚剧《母狮》、工业题材剧《石油土地》与西部历史剧）时的偏好时，谢里丹表示自己并无单一偏爱。他特别提到创作《母狮》的趣味在于尝试推测未来的国际政治走向并进行虚构化处理，令人震惊的是这种推演竟然屡次成真。在编写第二季剧情时，他设定了美国政府将墨西哥贩毒集团正式列为恐怖组织的桥段，当时他甚至半开玩笑地担心自己会不会因此被“取消封杀”18个月；结果剧集播出前后短短几周内，现实政治中竟然真的出现了完全相同的举动，让他看起来像个洞察天机的预言家。谈及由哈里森·福特主演的《1923》，谢里丹与罗根探讨了该剧所展现的20世纪20年代蒙大拿州的魔幻交错感：工业革命的浪潮正如火如荼，洗衣机、冰箱、电话与电网已经问世，但人们出门巡视领地依然只能骑马，处于现代文明与法外荒蛮的临界点。罗根特别赞赏了剧中由蒂莫西·道尔顿饰演的反派富豪，称赞曾饰演过詹姆斯·邦德的道尔顿将那种扭曲残忍、沉溺于虐待与支配的变态恶棍演绎得入木三分。谢里丹笑着透露，就连自己的妻子看剧时都会投来怀疑的目光，侧目质问他脑子里到底装了什么阴暗想法，怎么能写出如此令人毛骨悚然的受虐与施虐场景。 ### [02:08:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7688s) 间谍博弈的本质与摩萨德的寻呼机长线行动写实的情报剧创作对谢里丹的日常搜集提出了严酷考验。他打趣道，联邦调查局（FBI）和中央情报局（CIA）大概有一整个专项小组在盯着他的电脑浏览器，因为他的搜索记录堪称危险极端的大杂烩——前一秒在搜“如何制作炸弹”，下一秒在查“施虐受虐实践细节”，紧接着又在搜索“中东地区CIA高危行动区域”。 ```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: 现代谍报活动的核心运作机制 accDescr: 展示高科技手段与低科技人际操控在间谍博弈中的结合 subgraph Tools ["技术侦察手段"] T1["高科技：卫星图像与面部识别"] T2["低科技：反侦察规避追踪"] end subgraph CoreMethods ["传统谍报操纵核心（Tradecraft）"] C1["金钱收买（Bribery）"] C2["敲诈勒索（Blackmail）"] end Tools --> CoreMethods CoreMethods --> Result["获取杠杆与绝对控制权"] ``` 在深入探讨现代谍报技术（Tradecraft）时，谢里丹指出，尽管大众热衷于讨论卫星图像、追踪装置和面部识别等尖端科技，但最高明的间谍行动往往在设计上故意采用极度“低科技”的手段，以此规避数字追踪。谍报游戏的本质自始至终未曾改变，核心只有两个最古老、最有效的工具：**金钱收买**与**把柄勒索**，一切都围绕着获取控制个体的筹码（Leverage）展开。最后，谢里丹和罗根抛开政治立场，纯粹从谍报战术与行动规划的角度，惊叹于以色列情报机构摩萨德（Mossad）策划的寻呼机与对讲机爆炸行动。该行动展现了近乎疯狂的耐心与长线布局：建立空壳公司、层层渗透供应链、将暗藏玄机的电子通讯设备大规模卖给对手阵营，随后潜伏数年之久，最终在精准时机引爆。这种在现实中上演的超长周期策划与执行力，其精密与大胆程度甚至超越了多数虚构的谍战电影。 ### [02:10:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7843s) 突袭行动与现实比虚构更离奇的剧本乔·罗根与泰勒·谢里丹探讨了现代军事行动的惊人执行力。罗根提到委内瑞拉马杜罗突袭行动（Maduro raid）的执行细节与风险，直言如果编剧把这种剧情写进剧本，观众绝对不会买账，甚至会吐槽“这太简单了，滚一边去吧”。然而现实中它偏偏就顺利发生了。对比当年击杀本·拉登的行动（Operation Neptune Spear）中还有一架隐形黑鹰直升机意外坠毁，这次深入委内瑞拉首都加拉加斯市中心突袭军事基地的行动中，美军居然无一人阵亡，其行动结果令人感到不可思议。谢里丹结合自己为影视剧对军方所做的大量调研指出，真实的特种作战没有百分之百的“顺畅”，正如他在新剧《母狮》（Special Ops: Lioness）中的一句台词所写：“行动顺利吗？”回答是：“在这些行动的常规标准下算顺利。”只要你把一帮全副武装的人塞进直升机，意外就必然会发生。但能在无美方人员伤亡的前提下完成任务，这直接刷新了对第三世界国家进行干预的战术与技术标杆。 - 影视编剧若是写出无伤深入敌国首都基地抓捕的戏码，往往会被斥为荒谬与缺乏戏剧冲突。 - 突袭委内瑞拉基地的行动展现了美国与目标国之间令人震惊的技术与信息代差。 ```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: 军事行动现实与虚构剧情的对比 accDescr: 对比委内瑞拉突袭与击杀本拉登行动在戏剧创作与现实结果上的差异 subgraph Reality["现实战例"] A["本·拉登突袭行动"] -->|发生机械故障| B["直升机坠毁但完成任务"] C["加拉加斯突袭行动"] -->|技术代差碾压| D["零美军伤亡完成渗透"] end subgraph Scriptwriting["剧作逻辑"] E["过于顺利的行动"] -->|缺乏戏剧冲突| F["被观众认为虚假不买账"] end ``` --- ### [02:12:29](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7949s) 无人机、AI 与未来战争的“野兽形态” 谢里丹与罗根将话题转向战争形态的急速演变。谢里丹认为，人工智能（AI）与无人机的结合正在彻底颠覆战场规则，人类正步入类似《终结者》（Terminator）般的致命未来。如果将人类物种的技术演进比作生命周期，当前由算法与自主系统驱动的战争形态正处于“青春发育期”，一旦它完全成熟，必将演变成一头彻底失控的“恐怖野兽”。现如今的军用无人机早已超越挂载几枚地狱火导弹的“捕食者”（Predator）级别，许多无人机体积已与常规飞机相当，载弹量极其毁灭。过去还需要一名操作员坐在内华达州沙漠中的集装箱指挥站（ConEx）里远程操控横跨半个地球的目标，而现在的技术已经能做到完全预设程序或由算法直接赋予任务，实现全程自主飞行与自主打击。这种完全剔除人工干预的自动化杀戮机器，带来了前所未有的技术恐怖。 - 现代大型军用无人机具备跨洲际航程和足以摧毁重要设施的重型载荷。 - 全自主攻击模式消除了实时人工通信链路依赖，极大压缩了作战反应时间。 --- ### [02:13:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8025s) 不明异常现象（UAP）、反重力与磁悬浮交通设想面对这些难以置信的飞行器与自动化杀戮系统，罗根怀疑公众热议的不明异常现象（UAP/UFO）极有可能是美军在测试新型推进技术。实际上，早在上世纪五六十年代，军方与学术界就已经在研究反重力（anti-gravity）推进系统。谢里丹顺势提出一个关于交通能源替代方案的物理构想：同极相斥、异极相吸是磁力的基本原理，如果未来道路铺设特定极性的金属介质，而车辆底部配备同极性的磁性排斥系统，是否能彻底摆脱对石油燃料的依赖？罗根指出，这种设想虽然类似磁悬浮概念，但若要全面普及，最大的阻碍是必须对全国乃至全球现有的道路基建进行全面重构。罗根进一步引用了埃里克·韦恩斯坦（Eric Weinstein）的观察：纽约州北部某所大学拥有极其超标的物理系科研阵容，并且与一家收益远超常规对冲基金模式的机构紧密相连。韦恩斯坦认为整个安排极不寻常，高度怀疑背后存在未公开的、权限高于绝密的“特设访问项目”（SAP），且极有可能涉及超越当前公开物理学常识的尖端实验。 --- ### [02:15:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8150s) 科学家的离奇死亡与悬疑失踪案件罗根随后提及了一桩令人脊背发凉的悬案：近年来多名与洛斯阿拉莫斯国家实验室（Los Alamos）及尖端领域相关的顶尖科学家相继失踪或遭遇谋杀。坊间猜测这可能涉及新型推进系统或清洁能源突破——要么是触动了传统能源与推进系统的既得利益财团，导致研发被蓄意扼杀；要么是涉及外国间谍活动（如中、俄、伊朗等国的情报机构暗杀）。韦恩斯坦曾感叹，这些掌握顶级机密、身系国家命运的国宝级科学家，在现实中的安保级别低得惊人。他们往往每天独自开着一辆普通的沃尔沃轿车往返于大学和秘密研究机构，极易成为外国特工的暗杀目标。据两人梳理，在短短几年内就有约15名相关领域科学家遭遇非正常死亡或失踪。即使其中一部分是自然意外或统计巧合，但有5人左右的研究方向高度敏感： - 有人专注于航天器冶金工程（spacecraft metallurgy）。 - 有人专注于冷聚变（cold fusion）或新型核物理。针对这些异常模式，美国司法部已展开调查。罗根重点讲述了一起极度诡异的失踪案：那位研究冶金的女科学家与朋友结伴徒步，同行朋友只是转过头说了句话，前后不过30秒的时间，回头发现她已凭空消失。搜救团队动用了搜救犬和搜救队拉网式排查一无所获，直到近期才传出疑似找到遗骸的报道。以编剧思维看待案件的谢里丹立即敏锐地吐槽道：“如果是我的话，第一件事绝对是狠狠调查那个同行徒步的朋友——‘嗨，我和罗根去徒步，我一回头，那家伙人就没了’，这种说辞听起来太像凶手的借口了。” ### [02:19:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8377s) 离奇失踪、登山坠崖与游艇命案的谜团对话从一起看似毫无打斗痕迹的神秘失踪案切入，两人调侃起生活中那些令人疑窦丛生的离奇死亡事故。Joe Rogan 提到，现实中经常发生类似"夫妻一起去登山，结果妻子坠崖身亡"的桥段，警方赶到现场时总会怀疑地询问男方到底发生了什么、是不是吵架了，并要求翻查短信记录。Taylor Sheridan 接着提起最近在巴哈马发生的一起事件：一对男女乘帆船出海，女子莫名其妙掉入海中溺亡，案件疑点重重，警方对男方的说辞完全不买账。这让两人顺理成章地联想到了好莱坞历史上著名的悬案——娜塔莉·伍德（Natalie Wood）之死。当时伍德与丈夫罗伯特·瓦格纳（Robert Wagner）以及克里斯托弗·沃肯（Christopher Walken）一同乘游艇出海，据传瓦格纳与伍德在船上爆发了激烈的争吵，随后伍德便离奇落水身亡。这种离奇命案在现实中屡见不鲜，往往成为人们津津乐道却始终难以水落石出的谜案。 --- ### [02:20:38](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8438s) 失踪的喷气推进实验室科学家与间谍阴影随后，两人将话题转向更加耐人寻味的一起失踪案——美国宇航局喷气推进实验室（NASA JPL）的女科学家失踪事件。这名女性曾在材料加工组任职，专门研究耐高温高强度金属合金以及火箭推进系统所用的尖端金属材料。她是在加州帕萨迪纳境内的天使国家森林（Angeles National Forest）徒步时失踪的。尽管有人推测她可能是遭遇了美洲狮等野生动物袭击，但两人讨论认为，鉴于她所从事的顶级军事航天秘密研究，这背后很可能牵涉更复杂的国家安全问题。Sheridan 进而提到加州阿卡迪亚市（Arcadia）的前市长疑似是外国间谍的传闻，调侃间谍机构的渗透逻辑：先将有潜力的年轻代理人安插在地方从基层市长做起，未来逐步推向州议员、国会议员，甚至问鼎总统宝座。他们顺带回顾了冷战时期的间谍战与经典案例： - **ABSCAM 行动**：1970 年代末至 1980 年代初美国联邦调查局（FBI）发起的卧底腐败调查行动，牵涉多名国会议员和政界人士收受贿赂。 - **《谍网客》（The Americans）**：讲述苏联克格勃在美安插潜伏家庭伪装成普通美国公民生活的经典剧集。 - 两人一致认为，现代国家之间的潜伏谍报活动不仅从未消失，反而更加频繁，无论是俄罗斯、中国还是以色列的情报机构（如摩萨德在真主党、哈马斯或伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队中的渗透），其谍报技艺（tradecraft）之深都令人咋舌。 --- ### [02:24:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8658s) 拉斯维加斯民宅黑诊所与非法生物实验室作为影视编剧，Sheridan 坦言在编写有关现代谍报和跨国犯罪的故事时，大多需要根据历史案例进行大量合理推测，因为现实中许多间谍和违规科学家被捕后往往不了了之，甚至很少登上主流媒体的头条。对话随即转向近年来在美国本土曝光的非法生物实验室案件，特别是发生在拉斯维加斯的一处私人民宅地下黑实验室。在这起案件中，执法人员在一处兼作无牌短期民宿的住宅车库内发现了运行中的实验室，冷藏柜中存有大量装有不明液体的试剂瓶。更令人震惊的是： - 试剂瓶上标注着登革热（dengue fever）、HIV 病毒以及疟疾（malaria）等危险病原体，现场还查获了近千只实验用小鼠。 - 涉案男子被确认拥有以色列国籍，名为奥里·所罗门（Ory Solomon）。 - 荒谬的是，联邦检方最终撤销了针对该生物实验室的指控，涉案人员仅因其非公民身份被控在内华达州非法持有枪支，随后被释放离境。 Rogan 辛辣地讽刺道：“如果他没有枪，他到底要怎么保护自己的那些疟疾样本？大家可都要偷疟疾呢！”这种在民宅私藏致命病毒却最终以持有枪支罪轻描淡写结案的处理方式，让两人对司法的漏洞与背后的隐情感到匪夷所思。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 拉斯维加斯非法生物实验室案件脉络 accDescr: 展示拉斯维加斯私宅生物实验室从查获危险病原体到案件最终撤诉的处理流程 subgraph 现场发现 A["拉斯维加斯住宅车库 （兼无牌短租民宿）"] B["查获 1,200 份样本 （标有 HIV、登革热、疟疾等）"] C["约 1,000 只实验小鼠"] A --> B A --> C end subgraph 司法与调查 D["联邦调查局/CDC 判定未对社区造成直接危害"] E["嫌疑人 Ory Solomon 被拘捕"] B --> D D --> E end subgraph 最终结果 F["联邦撤销生物实验室指控"] G["仅以非法持枪罪起诉并释放"] E --> F F --> G end ``` --- ### [02:27:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8866s) 资讯过载时代的冷漠与群体麻木面对如此耸人听闻的黑幕，两人不免感慨现代社会的荒诞与无奈。世界上的混乱与丑陋真相层出不穷，越深入挖掘越让人感到心灰意冷。Sheridan 分析认为，造成公众这种无力感的核心原因在于互联网、社交媒体与智能手机所带来的信息大爆炸：在这个时代几乎已经没有秘密可言，但信息曝光的体量实在太大，以至于任何惊天丑闻都激不起实质性的波澜。 Sheridan 用了一个形象的比喻：“现在的资讯洪流就像在汹涌的洪水里扔下一片玫瑰花瓣，转瞬即逝。”如果这样的丑闻发生在 20 世纪 90 年代，像《夜线》（Nightline）或《与媒体见面》（Meet the Press）这样的顶级新闻专题节目会连篇累牍地深度追踪分析；而如今，公众处于严重的感官过载（sensory overload）之中。由于即便爆出大丑闻也从未见有人被真正问责、罪犯总能被轻易释放，普通大众早已心灰意冷，选择彻底关掉大脑，把手一摊，转身去看体育比赛来逃避这一切。 ### [02:29:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8946s) 新书亮相与洛杉矶健身房的偶遇泰勒·谢里丹（Taylor Sheridan）对出版商西蒙与舒斯特（Simon & Schuster）竟然还没把新书样书寄给乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）感到难以置信。罗根表示自己虽然还没收到纸质书，但他很期待听有声书版本，并认为作者亲自录制有声书非常关键。谢里丹信心满满地告诉罗根：“你绝对会他妈爱死这本书，它既古怪搞笑又干货满满。”罗根十分纳闷，谢里丹手头上同时在写上百部电视剧剧本，到底是从哪挤出时间来写书的。谢里丹没有立刻剧透书的内容，而是让罗根在屏幕上搜出书名——《如何在监狱里活下来》（*How to Not Die in Prison: A Survival Guide*）。看到这个标题，罗根忍不住笑了出来。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 《如何在监狱里活下来》创作灵感脉络 accDescr: 展示汤姆·纳尔逊经历、遭遇危机与泰勒·谢里丹借鉴《孤独星球》创作监狱指南的过程。 subgraph S1["背景与相识"] A["汤姆·纳尔逊服刑17年"] --> B["洛杉矶健身房相识并转型私教"] end subgraph S2["危机降临"] B --> C["疫情导致健身房倒闭"] C --> D["疑似结肠癌与单亲抚养困境"] end subgraph S3["创意落地"] D --> E["借鉴《孤独星球》旅行指南框架"] E --> F["西蒙与舒斯特签约出书"] end ``` 谢里丹随后讲述了这本书背后的离奇缘起。多年前他住在洛杉矶时，经常去比弗利大道与斯威策大道交界处的一家健身房。由于所有跑步机都靠窗排布，堵在路上的司机一抬头就能看到落地窗前锻炼的女性臀部，大家私下戏称那里为“比弗利美臀健身房”（Buns on Beverly）。谢里丹每天和室友慢跑过去锻炼，在那里碰见了一个体格极为强壮的硬汉。对方浑身肌肉炸裂，布满狂野的文身，气质与西好莱坞那些追求时尚的型男截然不同。两人逐渐熟络起来，对方名叫汤姆·纳尔逊（Tom Nelson）。某天闲聊时，纳尔逊提到自己四十多岁，之前在维生素专卖店打工，现在准备在此转行做私人教练。 - 健身房俗称：Buns on Beverly（比弗利美臀健身房），因靠窗跑步机视野而得名。 - 合著者：前科犯转行的健身教练汤姆·纳尔逊（Tom Nelson）。 - 出版商：Simon & Schuster（西蒙与舒斯特）。 --- ### [02:31:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=9075s) 传奇前科犯：从大毒枭到顶级私人教练两人熟络之后，谢里丹随口问纳尔逊是不是一直在加州生活，纳尔逊轻描淡写地回答说自己来自东南部，在加州呆了大约二十年，但其实才刚来洛杉矶不久，因为他此前在监狱里整整蹲了 17 年。出于对边界感的顾及，谢里丹当时识趣地没有追问。直到后来两人共进午餐时，纳尔逊才全盘托出自己当年荒唐暴烈的地下生涯：“兄弟，我以前是个彻头彻尾的混账罪犯，是当年好莱坞最大的毒贩，干过武装抢劫，甚至开车撞倒过缉毒局（DEA）探员。” 在漫长服刑期间，纳尔逊彻底迷上了健身，通过日复一日的严苛锻炼重塑了体魄，并下定决心出狱后将健身作为余生的追求。转型成为私人教练后，纳尔逊凭借专业能力在好莱坞开办了自己的独立私教馆，甚至一度做到了当地规模最大的独立私教工作室，谢里丹也经常去那里锻炼。后来谢里丹进军影视业并拍摄《黄石》（*Yellowstone*）时，纳尔逊曾寄来一部根据自身经历写就的电影剧本。谢里丹直言那个剧本写得颇具 20 世纪 90 年代老派动作片的风味，虽然剧本底子不错，但好莱坞如今早已不再追捧这类把重刑犯包装成英雄的故事，因此电影项目最终不了了之。 - 纳尔逊的真实罪名背景：涉足好莱坞顶级毒品交易、武装抢劫、驾车撞击 DEA 探员。 - 监狱救赎：在 17 年铁窗生涯中通过严格体能训练寻找人生出路。 - 事业巅峰：在好莱坞创立了极具声誉的独立私人健身馆。 --- ### [02:33:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=9185s) 绝境求生：假性癌症危机与《监狱旅行指南》构想新冠疫情暴发后，由于好莱坞严苛的防疫隔离限制，谢里丹和《黄石》剧组全员被困在蒙大拿州的牧场里无法外出。为了搭建内部健身房供剧组使用，谢里丹致电纳尔逊询问采购渠道，纳尔逊无奈告知自己的健身馆已被防疫政策彻底逼停，谢里丹索性雇了一辆平板拖车去洛杉矶，将纳尔逊所有的闲置器械一网打尽全部收购。之后两人断了联系，直到一年多以前，纳尔逊突然打来电话，声音绝望地表示自己陷入了绝境：他是一名 60 岁且留有重罪案底的单亲父亲，独自带着 5 岁的小女儿，更糟的是 X 光检查怀疑他患上了晚期结肠癌，已经走投无路。谢里丹当机立断，先通过自己在得克萨斯州的医疗资源安排纳尔逊飞往德州做彻底检查并进行手术，幸运的是体内的包块最终确诊并非恶性肿瘤。渡过健康危机后，纳尔逊试探性地询问谢里丹能否借几千美元应急，或者在片场安排一份打杂的工作。谢里丹直白地拒绝了借钱与做场务的提议：“我借钱给朋友的失败率是 100%。我不是银行，帮你撑 90 天根本解决不了根本问题；片场场务薪水微薄、工时极长，你还要独自带女儿，这根本不是长久之计。”谢里丹苦思冥想该如何帮这位老友“授人以渔”，突然灵光一闪：既然纳尔逊坐了 17 年牢，何不合写一本写给“误入歧途的普通犯人”的监狱生存指南？谢里丹买了一整堆《孤独星球》（*Lonely Planet*）旅行指南寄给纳尔逊，提议按照旅行手册的结构——国家概况、黑话词汇表、当地语言、餐饮住宿、交通法则——逐一拆解真实的监狱世界。 - 避坑原则：谢里丹坚守“绝不借钱给朋友”的铁律，认为短期借款无法解决长期的系统性财务危机。 - 概念参照物：《孤独星球》（Lonely Planet）系列深度旅行手册。 - 目标受众：“意外入狱者”（Accidental Inmate）——因一时糊涂犯罪、对监狱内部潜规则一无所知的普通人。 --- ### [02:35:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=9327s) 《如何在监狱里活下来》：误入铁窗者的生存手册纳尔逊对这个创意拍手叫绝，两人迅速达成合作协议：由谢里丹搭建全书框架并撰写所有引言，引导纳尔逊将 17 年的血泪教训转化为细致入微的生存指南。整本书长达数百页，详尽记录了初入监狱第一天的应对准则、如何在操场上规避危险、进监入册流程、伙食应对、小卖部潜规则、帮派派系斗争、传染性疾病防范、监狱暴乱应对策略、如何在狱中谋得差事，甚至巨细靡遗地讲述了如何自制简易武器（Shiv）等所有保命技能。罗根听得目瞪口呆，感叹希望自己这辈子都用不上这本书。谢里丹打趣道，99% 读过这本书的人最大的收获就是彻底打消犯罪念头，明白自己绝对不想踏进那鬼地方半步。谢里丹甚至在书的序言中郑重警告：“如果你是因为即将坐牢而购买此书，请务必在进监狱之前把它读完并留在家里；千万别把书带进牢房，否则你第一天就会因为这本书横死狱中。”两人合写了前三章样本送去提案，西蒙与舒斯特看后当场拍板买下版权，这笔版税收入不仅彻底解决了纳尔逊的生活难题，也让他能够在家体面地抚养幼女。 - 指南核心模块：入监流程、操场潜规则、自制武器、应对暴动、防范疾病、监区经济与小卖部。 - 核心警示：“切勿将此书随身带入牢房，必须在进监狱前读完并留在家中。” - 商业成果：三章样稿迅速打动西蒙与舒斯特并高价签约，彻底解决纳尔逊的家庭生计。 --- ### [02:37:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=9420s) 写作带来的心理调剂与彻底崩坏的美国监狱体系罗根由衷赞叹谢里丹仗义相助的举动，同时也十分佩服他在本就密不透风的高强度工作中还能额外挑起写书的担子。谢里丹笑称，写这本书反而是他逃离繁重影视工作的绝佳精神调剂。在筹备电视剧《石油人》（*Landman*）的片场，他经常会为各种鸡毛蒜皮的琐事抓狂或抱怨连连，但一转头坐下来和纳尔逊写关于监狱里天花与疾病蔓延的章节时，他立刻获得了全新的生活坐标系：“坐下来写写监狱里的惨状，你就会觉得比利·鲍伯·松顿（Billy Bob Thornton）哪怕拍戏迟到一个小时也根本算不上什么天塌下来的大事——虽然他拍戏从来不迟到。” 谈到此处，两人对话的气氛变得沉重起来，一致认为美国的惩教体系早已彻底崩坏。罗根提到了揭露阿拉巴马州惩教黑幕的纪录片，直言其残酷程度令人心碎。罗根还回忆起自己以前的室友曾是监狱纪录片《深入牢房》（*Lockup*）的剪辑师，对方常年前往福尔瑟姆（Folsom）和科科伦（Corcoran）等重型监狱现场跟拍，带回来的真实画面触目惊心。谢里丹总结道，整个监狱系统从骨子里就不是为了“改造与重新做人”而设计的，它实际上是一个严密运转的死循环机构，唯一能保证的，就是让踏入其中的人彻底丧失重新融入社会的能力，沦为终身无法自拔的罪犯。 - 影视片场对比：在《石油人》（*Landman*）片场的琐事烦恼，与监狱残酷生存现实形成鲜明对比。 - 涉及监狱及影视人物：演员比利·鲍伯·松顿（Billy Bob Thornton）、福尔瑟姆州立监狱（Folsom Prison）、科科伦州立监狱（Corcoran Prison）。 - 系统反思：现代美国监狱制度彻底丧失了再社会化（Rehabilitation）功能，实质上成了持续制造职业罪犯的制度化机器。 ### [02:38:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=9493s) 监狱再犯率的残酷现实与新书推介两人首先探讨了美国监狱体制中令人心酸的再犯现象。泰勒·谢里丹（Taylor Sheridan）直言不讳地指出，很多原本并非职业犯罪分子的人在进入监狱后，经历了残酷环境的侵蚀，等服刑结束重返社会时，往往已经被塑造成了一个彻头彻尾的罪犯。乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）顺着这一话题谈到了谢里丹的新书合著者汤姆·纳尔逊（Tom Nelson）这样的特例，并强调了美国刑事司法系统中令人震惊的高再犯率。罗根指出，美国的重新犯罪率高达百分之八十几，这意味着一个刑满释放的人想要彻底远离监狱，所面临的胜算比率几乎是一比四以上——整个体制和现实环境都在对他们施加巨大的阻力。谢里丹对此深表赞同，感叹这种现实确实极其“残酷”。罗根真诚地向谢里丹表示感谢，称赞他写出这本极具价值的书，并承诺自己一定会去听该书的有声书版本（甚至开玩笑说要在蒸桑拿的时候听），同时他也盛赞了谢里丹近年来创作的多部现象级热门影视剧。 - **极高再犯率**：美国刑满释放人员的重犯率高达80%以上（约86%），出狱后不再入狱的几率面临“4比1”以上的严峻劣势。 - **恶性循环**：监狱环境往往没有起到感化作用，反而成了培养更深层犯罪心理和技能的温床。 --- ### [02:39:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=9551s) 贾斯汀·盖奇的惊艳表现与拳台技术深度复盘谢里丹提议在节目结束前再聊一个激动人心的话题：近期举行的综合格斗焦点大战。话题随即引申到顶尖轻量级选手贾斯汀·盖奇（Justin Gaethje）身上。谢里丹回忆起此前在拉斯维加斯看拳赛时偶然遇到罗根的经历，那是他第一次在现场看盖奇打比赛。谢里丹自称是狂热的拳击爱好者，经常现场观摩职业拳击大赛，但他被盖奇的打击技艺深深震撼，直言如果盖奇选择去做一名职业拳击手，其站立打击水平完全能够立足职业拳坛。罗根表示完全认同，但也很庆幸盖奇选择进入 MMA 赛场。盖奇本身拥有 NCAA 一级全美摔跤手（Division I All-American）的深厚底蕴，身体素质顶尖，其独树一帜、侵略性极强的战斗风格完美契合 MMA。令人惊叹的是，一名拥有顶尖摔跤背景的选手，站立打击技术却能打磨得如此炉火纯青。随后两人复盘了盖奇近期那场震惊全网的史诗级对决：在博彩公司开出1赔6巨大赔率、外界几乎一边倒不看好的逆境下，盖奇以不可思议的韧性和战术执行力完成了惊天冷门。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Justin Gaethje Fighting Style Breakdown accDescr: 贾斯汀·盖奇在综合格斗中的技术风格与实战优势结构图 subgraph Foundation["底层基础"] A["NCAA 一级全美摔跤底蕴"] B["极其强悍的下巴与抗击打能力"] end subgraph StandupSkills["站立打击技巧"] C["重拳穿透力与终末发力 Timing"] D["单手箍颈接上勾拳 Collar Tie to Uppercut"] E["精妙的卸力与迎击意识"] end subgraph FightExecution["赛场决战成效"] F["顶住第二回合身体打击（爆肝）"] G["打碎对手双侧眼眶骨与鼻梁"] H["第三回合击倒对手并完成摔控统治"] end Foundation --> StandupSkills StandupSkills --> FightExecution ``` - **赔率逆袭**：盖奇在战前被部分博彩机构视作高达 6:1 的大冷门（Underdog）。 - **第二回合险境**：对手在第二回合发起了极其致命的肝脏打击（Liver Shot），几乎一度将盖奇重创击倒。 - **面部毁灭性反击**：即便处于险境，盖奇仍然给对手面部造成了极其惨烈的创伤。据后续报道，对手双侧眼眶骨折（Two broken orbital bones）且鼻梁骨折。 - **招牌杀招**：盖奇在比赛中屡次成功打出单手箍颈接上勾拳（Collar tie into an uppercut）的技术连招（与对阵菲兹耶夫时如出一辙）。 - **极度沉重的拳力**：包括全胜传奇哈比布·努尔马戈梅多夫（Khabib Nurmagomedov）在内的多位对手均公认，盖奇是他们挨过的拳头最重的人，具备在出拳末端瞬间爆发力量的顶尖转力技巧。 --- ### [02:41:33](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=9693s) 失败的淬炼、现场震撼体验与收尾罗根从拳手心态的角度深入剖析了这场对决对双方的深远意义。谈及落败的对手时，罗根表示自己同样是对方的超级拳迷，并坚信对方经历此次挫折后必然会蜕变归来。罗根认为，对于顶尖选手而言，一场刻骨铭心的失利往往是职业生涯中最宝贵的财富，因为它能撕掉自大与虚妄，让选手清醒地认识到自己也是血肉之躯，不能盲目地凭意气在狂乱的对攻中赌博，而必须学会在战术层面更冷静、更有策略地布局。盖奇在这场大战中展现出了无法被击垮的钢铁意志，尤其是在进入第三回合后，他不仅干脆利落地击倒了对手，还顺势施展颈臂控制将对手硬生生拽倒在地面形成彻底压制，现场表现堪称绝对统治级。罗根感慨道，亲历那种全场都不看好的弱势者（Underdog）上演逆天翻盘的时刻，带给人的震撼与鼓舞是无可比拟的。谢里丹更是分享了在现场观赛时那种近乎超现实的宏大氛围——当天上空甚至安排了八架喷气战斗机超低空编队掠过，机翼之间的间距极近，令人叹为观止。在震撼与意犹未尽的谈论中，罗根再次为谢里丹与汤姆·纳尔逊联合创作的新书《如何不在监狱中丧命》（*How to Not Die in Prison*）进行宣传，并宣布该书现已在各大平台以实体书与有声书等形式正式发售。两人互相道谢致意，正式结束了这期充实而精彩的对谈。 ## Notable quotes > [01:33:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5591s) 这才是人类原本该有的生活方式，这才是真正的生活。 — Joe Rogan > [02:01:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7274s) Oh, I ain't shit — Taylor Sheridan > [02:10:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7843s) 行动顺利吗？ — Taylor Sheridan > [02:10:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7843s) 在这些行动的常规标准下算顺利。 — Taylor Sheridan > [02:24:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8658s) 如果他没有枪，他到底要怎么保护自己的那些疟疾样本？大家可都要偷疟疾呢！ — Joe Rogan > [02:27:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8866s) 现在的资讯洪流就像在汹涌的洪水里扔下一片玫瑰花瓣，转瞬即逝。 — Taylor Sheridan > [02:29:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8946s) 你绝对会他妈爱死这本书，它既古怪搞笑又干货满满。 — Taylor Sheridan > [02:31:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=9075s) 兄弟，我以前是个彻头彻尾的混账罪犯，是当年好莱坞最大的毒贩，干过武装抢劫，甚至开车撞倒过缉毒局（DEA）探员。 — Tom Nelson > [02:33:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=9185s) 我借钱给朋友的失败率是 100%。我不是银行，帮你撑 90 天根本解决不了根本问题；片场场务薪水微薄、工时极长，你还要独自带女儿，这根本不是长久之计。 — Taylor Sheridan > [02:35:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=9327s) 如果你是因为即将坐牢而购买此书，请务必在进监狱之前把它读完并留在家里；千万别把书带进牢房，否则你第一天就会因为这本书横死狱中。 — Taylor Sheridan ## Mentioned Joe Rogan, Taylor Sheridan, Tom Nelson, Rick Perry, Marcus Luttrell, Dakota Meyer, Sean Ryan, Werner Herzog, Richard "Dick" Proenneke, Heimo Korth, Remi Warren, Harrison Ford, Timothy Dalton, Eric Weinstein, Natalie Wood, Robert Wagner, Christopher Walken, Ory Solomon, Billy Bob Thornton, Justin Gaethje, Khabib Nurmagomedov, Yellowstone, 1883, 1923, Special Ops: Lioness, Landman, Happy People: A Year in the Taiga, The Last Alaskans, How to Not Die in Prison: A Survival Guide, Simon & Schuster, Lonely Planet, Perplexity, Vice, NASA JPL, Mossad, DEA, FBI, CIA, CDC, Göbekli Tepe, Dinosaur Valley State Park, Lake Clark National Park, Angeles National Forest, Folsom Prison, Corcoran Prison ## Video description Taylor Sheridan is a writer, director, and producer of multiple series and films, including “Landman,” “Lioness,” “The Madison,” “Sicario,” and “Hell or High Water.” He is also a restaurateur, rancher, and author. His new book, “How Not to Die in Prison: A Survival Guide,” co-written with ex-convict turned personal trainer Tom Nelson, will be available June 23. https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/How-to-Not-Die-in-Prison/Taylor-Sheridan/9781668213452 https://www.cattlemenssteakhouse.com https://www.6666beef.com https://www.bosqueranchheadquarters.com Perplexity: Download the app or ask Perplexity anything at https://pplx.ai/rogan. Visit https://wildpastures.com/rogan for 20% Off + Free Shipping Switch today at https://Visible.com for just 25/mo. Or Save $10 on your first month of Visible+ Pro with code ROGAN. [Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4)

Source quotes

[93:11] Joe Rogan: 这才是人类原本该有的生活方式，这才是真正的生活。 [121:14] Taylor Sheridan: Oh, I ain't shit [130:43] Taylor Sheridan: 行动顺利吗？ [130:43] Taylor Sheridan: 在这些行动的常规标准下算顺利。 [144:18] Joe Rogan: 如果他没有枪，他到底要怎么保护自己的那些疟疾样本？大家可都要偷疟疾呢！ [147:46] Taylor Sheridan: 现在的资讯洪流就像在汹涌的洪水里扔下一片玫瑰花瓣，转瞬即逝。 [149:06] Taylor Sheridan: 你绝对会他妈爱死这本书，它既古怪搞笑又干货满满。 [151:15] Tom Nelson: 兄弟，我以前是个彻头彻尾的混账罪犯，是当年好莱坞最大的毒贩，干过武装抢劫，甚至开车撞倒过缉毒局（DEA）探员。 [153:05] Taylor Sheridan: 我借钱给朋友的失败率是 100%。我不是银行，帮你撑 90 天根本解决不了根本问题；片场场务薪水微薄、工时极长，你还要独自带女儿，这根本不是长久之计。 [155:27] Taylor Sheridan: 如果你是因为即将坐牢而购买此书，请务必在进监狱之前把它读完并留在家里；千万别把书带进牢房，否则你第一天就会因为这本书横死狱中。

Source quotes

[2:24] Joe Rogan: world... of balls and geometry [26:15] Joe Rogan: How the [ __ ] do you pay attention to everything? You're running a gigantic ranch and you have about 48 TV shows. [32:48] basically I want to take your character from Bad Santa and put him in West Texas and run an oil company. [63:30] the fight's over. It's a [___] lab leak. [70:00] Elon Musk: I almost don't want to talk about it because I don't want to get killed. It's that bad. [74:40] Steve Bullock: CEO of a state. [94:31] do a thing to completion [121:40] You just get an answer that you didn't earn [149:06] Taylor Sheridan: 100% failure rate of loaning money to friends [149:06] Taylor Sheridan: We're going to write a travel guide to prison for the accidental inmate [149:45] Taylor Sheridan: if you're buying this book because you're going to prison, finish the book before you get to prison. Do not bring this book with you to prison or you'll die on [__] day one. Leave the book at home.

Original transcript

[0:01] Joe Rogan podcast. Check it out. [0:04] >> The Joe Rogan Experience. [0:06] >> TRAIN BY DAY. JOE ROGAN PODCAST BY [0:08] NIGHT. All day. [0:13] >> What's happening? [0:14] >> What's up, buddy? [0:14] >> That's a hell of a [ __ ] bell puckle. [0:16] >> What is that? What is that? What's going [0:17] on there? [0:18] >> So, this one is uh for a horse I have [0:21] called Maverick Buzz the Tower that won [0:23] reserve at the Futurity. [0:25] >> And they give you a bellbuckle if you [0:26] win [0:27] >> a belt buckle and money. That's a dope [0:29] bell buckle. [0:30] >> Expensive belt buckle. [0:31] >> So guys like you that understand horses, [0:34] like if you saw someone with one of [0:35] those, you would know exactly what that [0:36] is right away. [0:37] >> Oh yeah. And the year, depending on the [0:39] year, I'm I'm going to know the horse. [0:42] >> It's like you fighter. It's like you had [0:44] fighters, [0:45] >> I guess. I guess it's probably similar. [0:47] Yeah. [0:48] >> Oh, that guy won the thing in 2012. He [0:50] fought so and so and that's the same [0:50] with me and horses. It's always so [0:52] interesting to me how these there's [0:53] these different sort of categories of [0:55] interest that people have that you know [0:57] one person might not know anything I [0:59] don't know anything about horses but [1:00] you're like [ __ ] balls deep you know [1:03] [ __ ] everything about it's crazy [1:06] >> it's such an interesting like pool of [1:09] knowledge the the people that are really [1:11] into horses and they start explaining [1:13] you like oh this is not as simple as [1:16] >> oh that's a horse and that's a horse too [1:18] like there's genetic lines and there's [1:21] certain tendencies that certain horses [1:23] actually pass on to their offspring. [1:25] >> Oh yeah, [1:26] >> it's crazy stuff. [1:27] >> There's a stallion and I really like [1:29] him. I've got a number of horses by the [1:32] st and his name's Spook's got a whiz and [1:34] and they're just incredibly balanced, [1:36] real feely, very very quickfooted, big [1:38] stoppers, but they they see dead people. [1:40] They see ghosts. So like [1:42] >> what? [1:43] >> Once every 3 months for no reason, this [1:47] thing's going to [ __ ] check out. And [1:49] I mean, check out just decide it's not [1:53] safe here. We're going back to the barn. [1:55] You can come with me or I'm gonna buck [1:56] your ass off or I'm gonna flip over. No, [1:58] he just loses his mind. [1:59] >> Whoa. [2:00] >> And you never know when it's going to [2:01] happen. [2:01] >> And his children have this as well. [2:03] >> Yeah. [2:04] >> Whoa. [2:05] >> Just a little quirk. [2:06] >> And that's but other than that, [2:07] they'reing automatic. [2:09] >> That's a big quirk. That's like if you [2:10] have a Corvette and it decides to drive [2:12] home. [2:13] >> Yeah. A little bit. A little bit. [2:14] >> Most of the time you can go to the [2:16] store. We all deal with it cuz they're [2:17] worth it, [2:18] >> I guess. But that seems so crazy. The [2:21] horsey. Do you really think it sees [2:22] ghosts? [2:24] >> It he I don't know what he sees. Some [2:25] kind of boogeyman. They're a lot of them [2:27] are deaf. So [2:28] >> really? [2:29] >> Yeah. [2:29] >> Why? [2:30] >> So Well, there's a there's a a gene. [2:33] Typically, if you see a horse with a [2:34] white face and the white goes above the [2:37] eyes, typically that horse is deaf. [2:40] >> Wow. [2:41] >> And so they can't hear, [2:43] but they can feel the vibrations. So [2:46] like that that could that could set one [2:49] of those horses off. [2:50] >> Just anything pounding on the ground [2:52] that might be something chasing it. [2:53] >> Yeah. I mean they're prey animals. [2:54] >> Right. Right. Right. [2:56] >> So [2:56] >> wow. The deaf thing is crazy. I wonder [2:58] if that has any sort of an advantage [3:01] where they could sort of tune out [3:02] distractions. [3:04] You know, I would imagine if a horse is [3:06] at a rodeo. [3:07] >> Yes, 100%. Because you know this crowds [3:10] are screaming and yelling it's not going [3:11] to bother them. Now, if they start [3:12] stomping their feet, I was going to show [3:14] this one horse of mine and I'm about to [3:15] run in the pen and all these guys are [3:18] cheering for this Italian rider and [3:21] they're all beating on the side of the [3:22] arena. [3:23] >> Oh. [3:24] >> And my horse checked the [ __ ] out. [3:28] >> He checked the [ __ ] out. [3:30] >> Like a whole herd of elephants. [3:33] >> Wow. I could imagine how weird that is [3:35] for the horse. Like it's being told to [3:37] do something, but its instincts are [3:39] like, "No, we got to get the [ __ ] out of [3:40] here. I can't hear anything. [3:42] >> That's nuts. [3:44] >> The hearing thing. There's a a a famous [3:46] pool player. His name is Shane Van [3:47] Boning. He's like one of the greatest [3:49] pool players of all time, if not the [3:50] greatest. And he's deaf. And he has [3:52] hearing aids. And when he plays, he [3:54] shuts him off. He just goes click [3:56] >> and goes into this world, [3:58] >> the zone [3:59] >> just of balls and geometry and just [4:02] doesn't miss. Just he's a horrifying [4:05] person to play. And because the fact [4:07] that he's got that extra sense shut off, [4:10] like the hearing, he can shut it off. [4:12] It's not just that. I mean, he's also [4:13] obsessive. He practices 10 hours a day. [4:15] I He's a all-time wizard. [4:17] >> Like he's won the US Open, which is the [4:19] hardest tournament to win in all of [4:21] pool. He's won it five times, [4:23] >> which is just not There's only one other [4:25] guy in history, Earl Strickland, that's [4:26] won it five times. [4:27] >> Everybody plays pool. Like everybody a [4:30] little. Yeah. But then the levels to the [4:32] game, like you start getting a [4:34] professional pool player. [4:36] >> Yeah. [4:36] >> And they're playing a totally different [4:38] game. [4:38] >> It's a totally different at just [4:40] watching it, you realize like, oh my [4:42] god, what am I doing? I'm hitting the [4:43] ball way too hard. I don't know what I'm [4:44] doing. My angles are all [ __ ] up. Like [4:47] this guy's playing that with English. I [4:48] would have just hit it straight. [4:50] >> You watch a spin, a back spin, it hits [4:52] over here and the it's just [4:53] >> it's the control of the ball. It's just [4:57] like they're part of the the stick is [4:59] the part of their body. The stick and [5:01] the ball, they're all connected in space [5:03] and time and they know where that ball's [5:05] going within millimeters. It's it's nuts [5:08] to watch. Like some of these guys, [5:10] they'll hit a ball and it'll travel, [5:12] it's a 9 foot table. It'll travel all [5:14] the [ __ ] away around the It's like a 12t [5:16] distance and it'll go in a 2-in spot and [5:19] you just go, "Fuck me." [5:22] It's crazy. And then if you do that and [5:24] you're deaf, too. Like you don't even [5:25] hear the cheers. You're just still in [5:27] the zone. [5:27] >> Just hyperfocused. [5:28] >> Yeah. Just hyperfocused. Autism probably [5:31] helps too if you have that. [5:32] >> Yeah. [5:33] >> You know, little little [5:34] >> Oh, yeah. Just a touch of [5:35] >> I got a little I think [5:36] >> I think anybody's good at anything [5:39] >> anybody's good at anything is either [5:40] ADHD or autistic. [5:42] >> Yeah. [5:43] >> They tried to give me medicine for the [5:45] ADHD. [5:45] >> Did they? [5:46] >> Yeah. I'm like, "Fuck no." [5:47] >> How old were you when they tried to give [5:48] it to you? [5:50] >> Oh, when I Well, they did give it to me [5:51] when I was a kid. [5:52] >> Really? [5:52] >> Yeah. What? they give you [5:53] >> and then you're who knows but whatever [5:55] you're little bottomized right and then [5:57] [ __ ] [5:58] >> and so I stopped taking it just cuz I [5:59] was now you're just like [6:02] >> you know and so my parents were like [6:04] [ __ ] it just let him run around let him [6:05] >> my neighbor's kid they gave it to him [6:07] when I when I lived in California it was [6:09] such a bummer he was this wild little [6:11] kid and they gave it to him and all a [6:12] sudden he was flat [6:14] >> Yep. [6:14] >> And I was like and the lady was like oh [6:18] he's on medication now because he's [6:20] hyperactive. I'm like, "Oh my god, not [6:22] my kid. Not my place. I'm not saying [6:24] nothing. [6:25] >> I just go to work." You know, I was [6:27] single back then and I was like 28 or [6:29] 29. And I just I was just so confused [6:32] how you could do that. And I kept [6:33] thinking like if somebody did that to me [6:34] when I was a kid, [ __ ] for sure I would [6:36] have been on drugs. Yeah. [6:37] >> If my parents knew about those options, [6:39] they could shut me the [ __ ] up. If I had [6:41] the wrong parent, my parents wouldn't [6:43] have done it, but if I had the wrong [6:44] parents, 100% I had all the traits that [6:47] would have allowed me to get on rin or [6:49] whatever. superpower if you understand [6:51] it. It's a superpower. [6:53] >> Yeah. If you could find something you [6:54] love. [6:55] >> People People say, "How in the world can [6:56] you write a script? You write all these [6:58] things." Like it's not that hard. Like [7:00] once I know what it is, I can sit You [7:02] could sit me in an airport [7:04] around a thousand people. I won't hear [7:06] them and I can sit there for 12 hours [7:09] straight [7:09] >> cuz you love it. [7:10] >> I just get I just hyperfocus. [7:12] >> But if somebody wants you to pay [7:14] attention to the history of Pop-Tarts or [7:16] something, it's not going in there. [7:18] physically can't do it. [7:19] >> Yeah. It's not going in there. [7:21] >> Yeah. That's that's the superpower. The [7:22] superpower is you could find something [7:24] you love and focus on it. But [7:26] >> the way our education system is designed [7:29] is so ass backwards. You take kids that [7:32] are so energetic and they have so much [7:34] life and you just squeeze it out of [7:36] them. Just sit still, stay put, listen [7:39] to boring [ __ ] And all day they're just [7:42] fighting this desire to scream and just [7:45] run out of the building and go do [7:46] something fun. Wasn't the um like [7:51] essentially what we call the modern [7:53] public education system founded by or [7:55] really by the Rockefellers as a as a [7:57] means to create workers. [7:59] >> Yep. Yep. [8:00] >> Like that's it. [8:01] >> Compliant workers and soldiers [8:03] >> conform. Just one of the reasons why [8:04] they decided to start school so early [8:06] for kids is the earlier you can start [8:08] them, the more you can get them to do [8:10] whatever you want them to do. And the [8:11] more you can get them to pledge [8:13] allegiance and get really excited about [8:15] this that or the other thing, including [8:17] all the trans stuff that you see in [8:18] school, all the pride stuff. And [8:20] teachers are working with preschool kids [8:23] and they're talking about sexuality and [8:25] you're like, they're [ __ ] six. Like [8:28] they don't know what you're talking [8:30] like, why are you even talking to them [8:31] about that? Because you can get them [8:33] early and you can program those thoughts [8:35] into their mind that this is a good [8:37] cause. And it could be anything. It [8:39] could be your religion. It could be your [8:41] political ideology. It could be being a [8:44] Christian, being a Muslim, whatever. If [8:46] you get kids young enough, you can talk [8:48] them into doing almost anything. That's [8:50] why they have child suicide bombers. [8:52] They don't try to get guys in their 40s [8:54] with a family to strap a vest on. They [8:57] try to get kids. [8:59] >> Yeah. And you know what what'll really [9:02] bake a couple of noodles is if you look [9:05] at because all these things are funded, [9:07] all these nonprofits and NGOs's they're [9:09] off, but where's the money come from? [9:11] And when you look at where the money [9:12] comes from and you realize, oh wait a [9:14] minute, and it's been coming for 40, 50 [9:16] years from these places. Qatar for [9:19] example, obviously Russia, China, all [9:22] these our enemies [9:24] donating money to all of these various [9:27] groups to divide to just eat away from [9:30] the inside. [9:31] >> Russia's been doing it since the 70s. [9:33] >> Yeah. 60s. [9:34] >> 60s. Yeah. [9:35] >> Yeah. [9:35] >> That uh Yuri Bezmanov, I'm sure you've [9:37] seen that video. [9:38] >> Anybody who hasn't, please watch it. [9:40] It's Yuri Bezmanov and it's in 1984. And [9:43] this guy is essentially describing what [9:45] America is going to look like [9:47] eventually. And he's dead on. Just dead [9:50] on. Dead on with the communism, the [9:52] Marxism, the stuff in the universities, [9:55] just completely poison their mind. Push [9:58] out any ideas of patriotism being a [10:00] virtue. All the hate for America that [10:02] you have, like all the division, all of [10:05] it engineered. Yeah. It's wild. [10:08] >> Just look at who it benefits. That's it. [10:10] That's it. It's real simple. [10:11] >> Yeah. just look and see who it benefits. [10:13] >> Well, it benefits a lot of people in [10:15] this country as well. Unfortunately, [10:16] there's a lot of people that really love [10:18] division and they can profit off of it [10:20] and they can work work an angle. You [10:23] know, we're with you. And this is a big [10:25] part of the problem with the whole idea [10:26] of nonprofits because nonprofits in [10:30] theory are awesome. It's a great thing [10:32] that people are willing to donate their [10:34] money. like wealthy people who are doing [10:37] well say, "You know what? I I think my [10:40] money could be best suited helping out [10:42] other people. It's beautiful. It's one [10:44] of the most amazing notions about people [10:46] when they can be charitable when they [10:48] don't have to be. They do it because [10:49] they want to and they really want to [10:50] help. Then you find out what's really [10:53] going on and that the majority of the [10:55] money is going to overhead and [10:57] employees." [10:58] >> Well, think about this. If if I create a [11:01] nonprofit to go solve Well, LA is a [11:03] perfect example. We can look at the [11:05] homeless situation that they have there [11:06] and all of these NOS's that are getting [11:08] all of this money [11:10] >> and the problem's getting worse. It's [11:11] not getting better, [11:12] >> right? [11:13] >> It's getting worse. But if I form an NGO [11:15] and that's my cause and I solve the [11:19] problem, well then what do I what do I [11:22] do with my NGO? [11:22] >> Exactly. [11:23] >> Now I got no money. Now there's no [11:24] reason to give me money. So they they [11:26] don't create them to solve problems. [11:28] Anything exacerbate the problem. [11:31] >> Make the problem worse. Make it longer. [11:32] Make it bigger. Look how big the problem [11:34] is. We need more money. [11:35] >> Some guy was doing a breakdown of the [11:37] people that work in the homeless [11:39] industry industry I say in air quotes in [11:42] California because that's really what it [11:43] is. It's they spent $ 24 billion on the [11:47] homeless problem and no one can account [11:49] for it. And they they tried to get an [11:52] accounting of it. They tried to do an [11:53] audit of it and Newsome vetoed it. [11:56] Vetoed it. Like why would you want to [11:58] know? Let's stop Let's stop all that [12:00] nonsense and build this [ __ ] train [12:02] track to nowhere that's never gonna get [12:03] built. [12:04] >> Well, they have a mile of it. They have [12:05] a mile of that train. [12:06] >> Only cost a hundred billion dollars. [12:07] Relax. [12:09] >> Like things take time. [12:10] >> They have a [ __ ] mile. Well, we're [12:12] trying to choose the path. How about [12:14] right beside the I5? How about that? How [12:16] about right next to the flat [ __ ] [12:17] highway? [12:18] >> Everything they do sucks. Yeah. [12:19] >> How about that stupid [ __ ] road over [12:22] the highway to make sure the mountain [12:23] lines are safe? [12:25] >> Yeah. It's like over hund00 million [12:28] still not done. [12:28] >> And they have them, by the way, that's [12:30] not a new concept. They have those [12:32] throughout the West. Yeah. And they [12:33] don't cost [ __ ] They don't cost much [12:35] money at all. And they they fix them [12:36] quick. They do it quick. [12:38] >> It's just [12:38] >> Yeah. They're done in a couple of [12:39] months. [12:40] >> Yeah. Pour some cement, put some sod [12:42] down, plant some [ __ ] grass, and away [12:43] you go. [12:44] >> Away you go. [12:45] >> But there but we're we're applying logic [12:48] to a state that doesn't use that. It's [12:50] it is a it's like it is as goofy as it [12:52] gets and then you think it's as goofy as [12:54] it gets and then you hear that Portland [12:56] just okay so this is going to be on the [12:58] ballot in November. It got enough votes [13:00] to be on the ballot and this is some law [13:04] that's under the guise of stop animal [13:07] cruelty. Well, who doesn't want to stop [13:09] animal cruelty? I certainly want to stop [13:11] animal cruelty. Let's stop animal [13:12] cruelty. So what does it mean? It means [13:14] no hunting, no fishing, no ranching, no [13:18] agriculture, [13:20] no animals that get harmed in any way. [13:22] No killing chickens for Kentucky fried [13:25] chicken, nothing. No animals die. And [13:28] it's a city or [ __ ] vote. Oregon is [13:31] voting on this in November. [13:37] >> No fishing. No fishing. What are you [13:41] saying? Are you [ __ ] high? [13:44] >> And and no so [13:45] >> no hunting, no ranching. Ranching? You [13:47] can't ranch? You going to kill a cow? [13:49] What? Are you crazy? That's illegal in [13:51] Oregon. [13:53] >> And here's that's probably sounds like a [13:55] good idea to one of those people. And [13:57] then but here's my question. All right, [13:58] so let's do it. Let's just say let's [14:00] just outlaw [14:02] ranching. Let's just say [ __ ] it. [14:06] >> Well, there's 91 million cattle in the [14:09] country. So what do we do with them? You [14:11] just leave them alone. Let nature take [14:13] its course. [14:14] >> Yeah, but but there's but they're not [14:16] but there's no there's no nature to take [14:18] its course. [14:19] >> It's 91 million head of [ __ ] cattle. [14:21] And I can promise you this. If you [14:23] outlaw me feeding them and taking care [14:24] of them, I'm not going to then they're [14:27] then they're wandering the highway. [14:28] >> Yeah. And then the bulls are out. [14:31] >> Yeah. [14:32] >> So you going to keep the bulls [14:33] contained? No. The bulls are going to [14:35] kill people. [14:36] >> Yeah. And and make more cattle and [14:38] >> and make more cattle. [14:38] >> Yeah. So now we have 900 million cattle [14:40] in three decades. [14:41] >> Yeah. And [ __ ] all your fences. Bulls [14:43] are going to smash them. [14:45] Bulls are going to eat your grass. Bills [14:47] are going to bulls are going to stomp [14:48] your dog. Like what are you talking [14:50] about? [14:51] >> It's I can't. [14:52] >> But it's not supposed to be logical. [14:54] It's all just a vibe, man. It's like and [14:58] it's not even a wellthoughtout one. But [15:00] the problem is you don't have to be well [15:02] thought out to get on the ballot. You [15:04] just have to appeal to certain [15:06] sensibilities and then all a sudden [15:07] people are like, "Oh, that would be [15:09] good. Let's stop animal cruelty." [15:12] >> And they're probably on SSRIs anyway. [15:14] >> It it'll it'll probably pass. [15:16] >> Nah. N I don't think it'll pass. [15:18] >> According to this New York Times [15:19] article, it was a guy one guy [15:21] >> one guy [15:22] >> got 135,000 signatures and got it passed [15:24] to that level. [15:25] >> I wonder how many of them are homeless [15:27] people. Um, he moved to Portland from [15:32] Denver from Southern California where [15:34] I'm trying to [15:35] >> do we have a photo of this dude? I want [15:36] to see what this guy looks like. [15:37] >> Show him. But it's [15:38] >> Of course he's from Southern California. [15:40] >> Of course he is. He's a vegan. Oh, [15:42] that's weird. I would have never [15:43] guessed. [15:43] >> Substitute teacher. [15:44] >> Oh, substitute teacher. [15:46] >> Keeps getting better. [15:47] >> I lost it. [15:48] >> What else? [15:49] >> That's all it was saying. They didn't [15:51] frame him very well. [15:53] >> Well, it shouldn't. It's a crazy idea. [15:56] There you go. Mickelson. [15:58] >> Yeah. [15:58] >> Substitute teacher, vegan, and petitions [16:00] organizer. [16:01] >> It's to have a system where we're not [16:03] killing or hurting animals anymore. I [16:04] love how he said a system. What are you [16:06] talking about? What does that mean? [16:07] What's a system? You're talking about [16:09] nature. What are you talking about? Like [16:12] they're going to kill each other, [16:13] stupid. Like, what the [ __ ] are you [16:16] talking about? Is it somehow another [16:18] less cruel with them when a mountain [16:19] lion gets into a pen of sheep and tears [16:22] them apart? [16:23] >> Yeah. [16:25] He figured the chance of meeting another [16:26] gay vegan were better in Portland. [16:33] >> He's probably not wrong. [16:34] >> Yeah, it's probably a good bet. [16:36] >> Solid bet. [16:37] >> Yeah. [16:38] >> Jesus. [16:38] >> He was sitting there going, "Midland, [16:39] Texas, Portland, Oregon. Where am I? [16:41] Where you got to go to Portland? [16:43] >> Go to Portland and take some medication. [16:45] Just [ __ ] have a good time." There he [16:46] is. [16:47] >> There we go. [16:47] >> Hey, fella. [16:50] >> Oh, he's already gotten too much [16:52] attention from us. Yeah, it's uh there's [16:55] a lot of silly people in the world and [16:57] you know like we were talking about with [16:58] young people, if you get young people [17:00] indoctrinated early enough to think [17:02] these silly ideas make sense, [17:04] >> which is one of the reasons why I love [17:06] that Kevin Cosner moment on your show [17:09] when uh he had explained to that vegan [17:11] lady. [17:11] >> Oh yeah, [17:12] >> it's such a good moment. [17:13] >> How cute does an animal have to be [17:14] before you care if it [ __ ] lives? [17:16] >> Yeah. And what the actual like what life [17:20] gets killed when you're just talking [17:22] about farming just food. [17:24] >> Plow in a field. [17:25] >> Yeah. Just plowing a field or [17:27] >> or go or go build a road. [17:29] >> You want to destroy some [ __ ] [17:31] organisms, go build a road. [17:33] >> Yeah. And if you're riding on those [17:34] roads, [17:35] >> you're in that system. And then there's [17:37] the bees. Like the amount of bees that [17:40] die every year so we could have avocados [17:43] is bananas. [17:44] >> Yeah. bring them in from Brazil [17:46] >> by the billions. By the billions by the [17:48] bee and they die bees and then on top [17:51] the So it's avocados and almonds. Those [17:54] are the two big ones, right? [17:55] >> Yeah. Almonds. You know what's [17:57] fascinating? And I'm going to We can [17:58] look it up. [18:01] Almonds. The amount. It's something like [18:04] 19 gallons of water is what you have to [18:07] give to get one almond. [18:13] >> Is that real? Yeah. Yeah, we can we can [18:15] Yeah, it's [ __ ] bananas. [18:18] >> My doctor told me almonds aren't even [18:19] good for you. [18:20] >> Well, you know, it's [18:22] >> he said they're okay for you. He said, [18:23] but you know, there's [18:25] >> there was a time in the Mediterranean [18:26] where they were they were poisonous. [18:28] They have strict nine in them. And it's [18:30] one of the first domesticated plants. [18:33] And what people realized, whoever homo [18:35] sapiens or Neanderthalss, whoever's [18:37] wandering around, they're like, "The [18:39] squirrels are eating those poisonous [18:40] nuts from that tree." Huh? They're okay [18:44] from this one, not okay from that one. [18:46] >> So they started cutting down and [18:48] uprooting all the ones where the [18:50] squirrels wouldn't eat. [18:52] >> Oh, interesting. [18:53] >> Yeah. And so that's so the almond [18:55] originally. [18:57] >> This episode is brought to you by Wild [18:59] Pastures. Here's a deal, folks. Wild [19:01] Pastures delivers 100% grass-fed and [19:04] finished beef, pasture-raised pork and [19:07] chicken, even wild caught seafood right [19:10] to your door. I love their ribe eyes. [19:12] Just an excellent cut of meat. I had [19:14] them last week. They're It's great [19:16] stuff. It's high quality meat from [19:17] animals that are raised the way nature [19:20] intended outdoors on lush green [19:23] pastures. No cages, no crates, no feed [19:26] lots. Wild pastures only works with [19:29] small familyrun regenerative farms here [19:32] in the USA. So, you're supporting [19:34] American farmers and the land itself [19:37] because regenerative farming restores [19:39] soil, improves ecosystems, and protects [19:43] biodiversity. And what's more, Wild [19:45] Pastures, nutrientdense, zero junk, [19:48] highquality meat is around 25 to 40% [19:52] less than you pay for the same quality [19:54] in store. And right now, you can save [19:57] even more with 20% off every Wild [20:00] Pastures box and free shipping for life, [20:04] plus $15 off your first box at [20:07] wildpastures.com/roganogen. [20:10] That's wildpastures.com/rogan. [20:15] >> Relatively waterintensive crop eachund [20:19] gallons of water per pound. [20:24] That's so crazy. [20:27] >> And then, [20:27] >> oh my god, [20:28] >> here's here's my new like look, I'm a [20:31] writer, right? So words matter to me and [20:33] when we when we misuse them in our [20:35] society, it just bothers me, right? So [20:39] >> all these things that we're calling [20:40] milk, like almond almond milk, [20:42] >> right? [20:43] >> And I'm and I'm just determined to call [20:44] it almond juice because that's what it [20:47] [ __ ] is. It's not even almond juice. [20:49] It's not like we're extracting. [20:50] >> It's almond tea almost. We're we're [20:52] taking almonds, pulverizing them, and [20:54] brining them in water, [20:56] >> essentially leeching out the flavor of [20:58] the almond, and then adding a bunch of [20:59] [ __ ] to it and sugar and whatever, [21:01] >> adding a lot of sugar. My friend Duncan [21:02] was like, "Dude, almond milk is good for [21:04] you." I go, "You look at how much sugar [21:05] is in there?" And we were on the phone. [21:07] He goes, "Holy shit." I go, "Yeah, man. [21:10] That's why it tastes good." But my [21:12] doctor told me I had oxalates in my [21:14] diet, in my my blood test. He said, [21:17] "Your oxalates are kind of high." He [21:18] goes, "Are you eating almonds?" And I [21:21] said, 'Yeah, I eat almonds all the [21:22] time.' He's like, "Yeah, cut back." He [21:24] goes, "That's where it's from." [21:26] >> Really? [21:26] >> Yeah. See, find out how much how much [21:29] oxalates are in almonds. I just listen [21:31] to them. And also, it's a lot of like um [21:34] a lot of that gluten-free flour stuff. [21:37] >> If you buy a lot of that stuff, it's [21:39] like almond flour a lot of the times, [21:41] >> right? [21:41] >> Almonds are a high oxalate food. Eating [21:44] them can raise oxalate levels that [21:46] circulate, get filtered by the kidneys [21:48] and appear in urine, which may increase [21:50] kidney stone risk in susceptible people. [21:52] Yeah, [21:54] >> almonds contain about 296 milligs of [21:57] oxalate per 100 grams, roughly 4 [21:59] milligrams per nut, putting them in the [22:01] high oxilate category. [22:04] Yeah. He said they're not bad if you [22:06] just have them every now and then. He [22:07] goes, but don't don't do it on a regular [22:08] basis. Huh. Yeah. [22:13] There's a lot of stuff that is high [22:14] oxilates that people don't think about [22:15] it that can really [ __ ] you up. Kale, [22:17] for instance, like I used to drink kale [22:20] smoothies all the time until another [22:22] doctor told me, "You really should cook [22:23] the kale. [22:24] >> Cook it and then filter out whatever the [22:26] water's in it." And I go, "Really?" I [22:28] go, "Why?" He goes, "Oxalates." He goes, [22:30] "You want to cook the oxalates out of [22:32] them." [22:32] >> Really? [22:32] >> Yeah. And that's apparently what causes [22:34] a lot of kidney stones with some folks. [22:36] ly drink a lot of those green smoothies, [22:38] which I used to do every day. I used to [22:39] take a bunch of kale, throw in a bunch [22:41] of apples and some ginger and some [22:43] garlic and blend it all up and drink at [22:45] the beginning of the day. I thought I [22:46] was doing a good thing. [22:47] >> And he was like, "You're just blasting [22:50] your system with oxalates." And I was [22:51] like, "Oh, all right." [22:54] >> Yeah. [22:55] >> Have some [ __ ] eggs, bro. [22:55] >> He said, "Have bacon. Have some bacon." [22:57] I'm like, "Fucking bacon's better for [22:58] you?" Like that. My journey of figuring [23:00] out what to eat was a long one. It was a [23:03] long one. And then thank god I got this [23:04] podcast because if I hadn't had all [23:06] those conversations with people where I [23:08] realized like oh so we're like and now [23:10] the food pyramid's completely flipped [23:12] which is hilarious. [23:13] >> Yeah. [23:13] >> But it's like I've had enough [23:15] conversations where I realize like oh [23:17] all these people don't know what the [23:18] [ __ ] they're talking about and they're [23:20] giving advice and it's weird. It's weird [23:23] how much bad advice there is for food [23:25] and for health and for [23:27] >> [ __ ] fill in the blank almost [23:29] everything in our society. [23:30] >> The food pyramid was created by Johnson [23:32] and Johnson. Yeah. Or Kelloggs, which is [23:35] like how do we get people to eat our [23:37] [ __ ] in the morning and then again at [23:39] lunch and then Well, the one thing that [23:41] we can't control and they talk about the [23:43] the one thing that we do not have is [23:47] this massive industrialized meat [23:49] production because there's no there's no [23:52] economical way to do it. They'd do it if [23:54] they could. Harris Ranch, which you [23:56] you've probably seen off I5 in uh in [23:59] California's the closest version of [24:01] that. But what it is is a feed yard, [24:03] right? Where you get them together and [24:05] feed cattle for 90 to 150 days before [24:08] you go send them off and slaughter them, [24:10] right? That's the closest thing there is [24:13] to an industrialized beef industry [24:16] because it's an very inefficient way. [24:20] It's way better to farm, right? It's [24:22] more efficient to farm than it is grace [24:24] cattle. So, you only want to graze [24:25] cattle somewhere that you can't farm. At [24:28] the end of the day, you want to graze [24:30] cattle are great at taking protein from [24:32] poor protein sources and metabolizing [24:34] it, right? So, graze them in real rocky [24:37] terrain with native grasses that that [24:40] you can't farm. You can't till it just [24:41] can't. Um, and it needs to be eaten by [24:45] something or weeds will overtake it, [24:47] right? Because grasses [24:49] >> grass grows better when it's being [24:50] grazed. Um, and so there's no way to [24:54] industrialize that or centralize it. the [24:56] most centralized it is is at the packing [24:58] house right where you've got four [24:59] packing major packing houses um that [25:02] control 90 something% of the beef [25:04] industry and that's starting to change [25:07] co was extremely helpful for the smaller [25:09] farmer and rancher to sit there and get [25:11] their product out right and find small [25:14] they start popping up people have opened [25:16] these USDA facilities that that don't [25:18] process 800 head of cattle an hour they [25:22] maybe do 50 or 50 a [25:26] And now people can go there because [25:28] they're a USDA facility. They can buy [25:30] beef directly from them. Buy it from the [25:32] rancher, right? And you can control [25:34] where your food's coming from as opposed [25:36] to what what was happening um where [25:41] you'd get a bunch of if you're going to [25:42] go get a burger, you're you're eating [25:45] some Australian killer bull, right, for [25:46] the most part or some something from [25:48] Brazil or you're not eating something [25:51] that you want to eat, right? Um, when [25:55] you go to a nice steakhouse, the the [25:58] stakes there are [26:00] they're going to come from most likely [26:02] Texas, uh, Iowa, Nebraska, Montana. [26:07] There's there's select areas where [26:08] people are spending that kind of [26:10] attention and time to raise that kind of [26:12] quality of beef, right? Um, and it's [26:15] being done by smaller ranchers. It may [26:17] be a big ranch, but it's still operated [26:19] by relatively few people. You know, 4 [26:21] sixes is 300,000 acres, but there's 12 [26:25] cowboys. [26:26] >> Wow. 12 cowboys for 300,000 acres is [26:29] nuts. [26:30] >> Yeah. [26:30] >> How do they keep track of everything? [26:33] >> I mean, we break it down into pastures [26:35] and then you have uh and then the [26:37] pastures fall under the terminology is [26:40] this. say, "Oh, if you're in Guthrie, [26:42] there's a there's a camp, and we we call [26:45] it South Camp, um because it's in the [26:47] south, and it's responsible for 50,000 [26:50] acres, right? Which is broken down into [26:53] multiple pastures that are between 7 and [26:55] 10,000 acres. There's one big pastor in [26:58] that in that camp that's like 14,000 [27:00] acres." Um, and so then you have North [27:04] Camp, you have what we call then we have [27:08] camps around the town, little town of [27:10] Guthrie. So you break it down into the [27:12] responsibility of each cowboys somewhere [27:15] between 35 and 50,000 acres. [27:19] Wow, that's a hell of a responsibility. [27:23] >> Yeah, [27:23] >> that's a lot of work, man. [27:24] >> A lot of work. What's it, you know [27:25] what's really interesting about your [27:27] shows, particularly Yellowstone, it got [27:29] people like really attracted to the idea [27:31] of brutal hard work as being romantic. [27:35] >> Yeah. [27:36] >> You know, people like really identified [27:38] with those guys on Yellowstone that were [27:40] just like so dedicated to that ranch, so [27:43] dedicated to busting their ass and [27:46] working all day hard [ __ ] work and [27:48] then just hanging out together [27:50] afterwards. And there's something about [27:52] that life that's so simplistic and [27:54] romantic to people that it just really [27:56] resonated with so many people. They [27:58] didn't even know that they liked that. [28:00] Well, it's it's uniquely American, [28:03] right? And and the amount of freedom [28:05] that is. So, we move somebody out to [28:08] South Camp and we go, "Okay, so here you [28:10] are. There's your house at South Camp. [28:13] See you in a week or so. [28:16] Go figure [ __ ] out. [28:19] keep track of the cattle and you give [28:21] them a string of horses and they work [28:22] their horses and they and they ride that [28:24] property. They know every inch of it and [28:26] you don't ever you don't we don't we [28:28] don't have weekly corporate meetings. [28:30] >> How do they get supplies? Is it is like [28:31] the house stocked in advance? [28:33] >> Yeah. Go to town, you know, towns which [28:37] is an endeavor, right? Town's 90 miles [28:39] away. Um so you go to town once a week, [28:42] right? Adventure, stock up, [28:44] >> go back. [28:45] >> Wow. [28:46] >> Yeah. But it's it's [28:48] >> it's a crazy life [28:49] >> and people incorrect. Not every this [28:52] isn't true of every cowboy. There's [28:53] plenty of cowboys that typically they [28:55] grow up on that ranch and that's the [28:57] life that they know and that's what they [28:58] want to do, right? But they still go off [29:01] to college. Like almost every one of my [29:04] cowboys has a ranch management degree. [29:07] Like they went to school. [29:08] >> Wow. [29:09] >> To study. [29:10] >> What's a good school if you want to be a [29:12] cowboy? [29:13] >> I mean there's a quite a few of them. [29:14] Texas Tech. I mean, that's a phenomenal [29:16] ranch management program. A bunch of the [29:18] guys on the sixes went there. TCU has a [29:21] ranch management program, a good one. [29:22] Texas A&M. Um, you know, we have a we [29:26] have vets that live on the ranch. [29:28] Obviously, we breed a ton of horses. Um, [29:31] and so our vets, Colorado State's an [29:33] excellent veterinary school for large [29:34] animal vets. Obviously, Texas A&M is a [29:37] phenomenal school. Texas Tech as well. [29:39] Those are [29:40] >> Dude, how the [ __ ] do you pay attention [29:41] to everything? You're running a gigantic [29:43] ranch and you have about 48 TV shows. [29:47] How the [ __ ] do you do it? I don't [29:49] understand it. I Every time a new Taylor [29:51] Sheridan show pops up, I say to my wife, [29:53] I go, "How the [ __ ] is he doing this?" [29:55] Like, where does he have this time? Part [29:57] of it is, if you think about it, so my [30:00] crew, my core crew is the same crew I [30:03] made Wind River with, like when we had [30:05] no money. I remember one time I'm on the [30:08] top of a mountain with me and my first [30:10] AD and my DP, uh, Ben Richardson, and [30:14] there's not a producer. We haven't seen [30:16] anybody in a week. And I looked at, [30:18] we're freezing our asses off at 7 below [30:20] zero in northern Utah. And I'm like, [30:22] guys, you know, we could just [ __ ] off [30:24] to Hawaii. Nobody would know for a [30:26] while. Like, [30:29] we have we have their we have their [30:30] money. They don't know. They don't [30:32] actually know where we are. they're just [30:34] trusting that we're going to make this [30:35] movie, which we did. Um, and it was [30:38] incredibly difficult. But that's the [30:40] same team that went over and did [30:41] Yellowstone, which is then the same team [30:43] that went up and did Mayor of Kingtown [30:45] with me and then 1883, 23, Lionus, Land [30:50] Man, all of them. And we've promoted [30:53] from within. I've got PAs that are now [30:55] first ads. I've got uh camera operators [30:58] that are now directors. Um, so we've [31:00] promoted from within so everyone [31:01] understands the way we do it and it's so [31:03] faking efficient. We don't ever have and [31:06] you know because you've been in this [31:07] industry forever. [31:09] These people will have meetings upon [31:11] meeting upon meeting. They'll have a [31:13] they'll have a tone meeting where a [31:15] whole bunch of people are going to sit [31:16] around and try and talk about the tone [31:18] of the script. Wouldn't you read the [31:20] [ __ ] thing? [31:23] You We have to have a meeting about it. [31:25] How about we don't have a meeting about [31:26] it? And then they'll have a they'll have [31:28] a and this is also networks. They love [31:30] this [ __ ] So that they can have a [31:32] reason for their existence, right? All [31:33] these middle management people [31:35] >> and they want to do a prop showand tell [31:36] where someone's going to come show them [31:38] all the props that we're going to use. [31:41] >> Really? [31:41] >> Well, we don't do that [ __ ] because I'm [31:43] like, I need your permission to use [31:44] which which Bick lighter I'm going to [31:46] use in this [ __ ] scene. How about I [31:48] just make the decision? And how about we [31:52] use the same Bick lighter in all these [31:54] [ __ ] shows and I don't ever have to [31:56] pick a Bick lighter again. How about [31:57] that? So, we just streamlined it and [32:00] made it to where it's so efficient. [32:01] Typically, a TV show will start up and [32:04] they'll prep for 12 weeks before they [32:06] start filming. We We do it in four. [32:10] Wow. Well, that makes sense. It makes [32:12] sense that it's streamlined because I've [32:14] been on shows when they first start out [32:16] and it's chaos and there's a lot of [32:18] network involvement and there's a lot of [32:20] [ __ ] but then once it gets going, [32:22] they go, "Oh, you guys know what you're [32:23] doing." [32:23] >> Yeah. [32:24] >> Leave me alone. [32:24] >> Yeah. [32:25] >> Yeah. [32:25] >> We're there from the beginning now. [32:27] >> That's beautiful. [32:28] >> We haven't missed if you don't miss, [32:29] >> right? Well, it's like you don't miss [32:32] like you don't miss with the writing. [32:33] You don't miss with the story lines. [32:35] Like you don't have any duds, man. Which [32:36] is incred This is incredible. It's an [32:39] incredible accomplishment to to have [32:40] that many [ __ ] shows and all of them [32:42] be good and all of them be, you know, [32:44] like very addictive. You know, Land Man [32:46] is so addictive. [32:48] >> It's it's that show. It's about [32:52] something very serious and then I can [32:53] just throw [ __ ] at it. [32:55] >> Yeah. Let's just take a bunch of old [32:56] people to a strip club. [32:57] >> Billy Bob is [ __ ] awesome. [32:59] >> He's a genius. [32:59] >> I love that guy. He's so good on that [33:01] show. It's like it was made for him. [33:03] >> It was made for him. [33:04] >> I mean, he's done so many things. I went [33:06] to Billy Bob before I uh before I wrote [33:10] a word and I told him I said if you [33:12] don't do this I'm not going to do it [33:13] because I'm not going to chase my tail. [33:15] >> He goes what is it? I said I want to do [33:17] I said basically I want to take your [33:18] character from Bad Santa and put him in [33:20] West Texas and run an oil company. [33:22] >> He goes, "You want the guy from Bad [33:24] Santa to run the oil company?" I said, [33:25] "That's what I want." He goes, "That [33:26] sounds [ __ ] awesome." [33:28] Yeah. [33:29] >> Well, it's it's educational, too. I [33:32] mean, a lot of people like have no idea [33:34] how the oil business works. And you you [33:36] watch that show, you go, "Jesus Christ, [33:38] what a crazy job." It's an insane job. [33:41] And and and the other thing about it is [33:45] we're so completely dependent upon [33:47] petroleum in every single aspect of our [33:50] lives. So completely dependent upon it. [33:52] And we can debate how bad it is or isn't [33:55] and and and or not debate it. The [33:57] reality is we don't have an alternative. [33:59] Like it does not exist. It simply [34:02] doesn't exist. And we could sit there [34:04] and say, "Well, wind and this." No. You [34:06] sit down with any climatologist and any [34:08] engineer, they're going to tell you, [34:10] "Our best hope for a replacement of [34:12] petroleum fuels is cold fusion." And [34:15] we're 30, 40 years from it, being [34:18] something that we can rely upon [34:20] >> and reduce little nuclear reactors, like [34:22] itty bitties, like [34:24] >> the size of this coffee pot. [34:25] >> That's what they're talking about. [34:26] They're talking about like individual [34:28] reactors that people have in their [34:29] homes. Like, how long does it take [34:30] before there's disasters? [34:33] Like, that sounds [ __ ] Having a [34:35] really good nuclear power plant for a [34:37] city is an awesome idea. Having everyone [34:40] have their own nuclear power plant [34:42] sounds [ __ ] crazy. [34:44] >> You know, [34:44] >> how many [ __ ] are going to cut into [34:46] that thing? [34:46] >> Well, people still put [ __ ] metal in [34:48] microwaves, so I don't think we should [34:50] be giving [34:51] >> I've done it. I'm like, well, how bad [34:52] can it really be? [34:53] >> There's people that leave their [ __ ] [34:55] gas on so that someone can die in the [34:57] house. No, we don't. [34:58] >> People are nuts. [35:00] >> People are nuts. If you literally have [35:02] consumer level nuclear power plants, [35:06] >> not with these monkeys. That's what Not [35:08] with the human beings that we are today, [35:09] our our current form. We're not [35:11] enlightened enough to have personal [35:14] nuclear power plants in our house. [35:17] >> Oh, [ __ ] [35:18] >> Yeah. So, we're we're we're dependent [35:20] upon it. Um, [35:21] >> that's why we're in Iran right now. [35:24] >> Also because of Israel. But I mean we're [35:26] we're in Iran. I mean the whole thing [35:29] about it is the oil the straight of [35:31] Hormuz. It's like I think it's 40% of [35:33] the world's oil supply passes through [35:34] there. [35:35] >> Yeah. [35:36] >> Like Christ. [35:37] >> No. That's And and and I think also [35:41] China. [35:42] >> Mhm. [35:42] >> It's a big play against It's a chess [35:44] piece against China. [35:46] >> Mhm. [35:47] >> That's what I think. [35:48] >> Yeah. All of it's [ __ ] terrifying. [35:50] >> What uh And I'm not saying we should [35:54] have or we shouldn't have. I'm not [35:55] commenting politically, but [35:59] what those guys, those SF guys did in [36:01] Venezuela was [ __ ] gangster. [36:05] >> It's crazy. [36:06] >> Whether I'm not saying they should or [36:07] shouldn't. I'm just saying, [36:08] >> right? [36:09] >> The team was sent and and the team I [36:13] mean, can you imagine if I wrote it in a [36:15] movie, people would go, "That's [ __ ] [36:16] ridiculous, Taylor." [36:17] >> Right? We don't have fly a bunch of SF [36:20] dudes, drop them off on the roof of this [36:21] high-rise surrounded by the [ __ ] [36:23] Cuban special forces and they're going [36:25] to kill all of them. And then they're [36:26] going to [ __ ] snatch him and his [36:28] wife, go back to the roof, and just [36:30] [ __ ] fly away. [36:32] That's what they did. [36:34] >> And they're going to do it with sound. [36:36] They're going to disable everyone with a [36:37] sound weapon. Like what? [36:40] >> Like there was Do you remember when they [36:41] first started talking about that Havana [36:43] syndrome and people were dismissing it? [36:44] This is horshit. This is [ __ ] Like, [36:46] no. They're talking about people that [36:48] are in Havana that they've been [36:49] targeted. Something zapped them. [36:52] >> Lowle frequencies that made them [36:53] nauseous. Yeah. [36:54] >> Yeah. And I think that is a fraction of [36:56] whatever they unleashed in Venezuela. [36:58] >> Who knows? [36:59] >> The discombobulator, that's what it's [37:01] called, classified secret weapon system [37:04] President Donald Trump claimed US forces [37:07] used during the January 3rd operation to [37:09] capture Venezuelan President Nicholas [37:10] Maduro. He stated that the weapon [37:12] successfully disabled enemy equipment [37:15] and air defenses, preventing them from [37:17] firing back. So, it's it's both it [37:21] disables the people and it disables [37:23] their weapon system. [37:25] What? That's amazing. What the [ __ ] are [37:27] we doing? Official silence. When asked [37:29] for specific technical or operational [37:31] details about how the device functions, [37:33] Trump famously told New York Post, "I'm [37:35] not allowed to talk about it." [37:38] They He says, "They press buttons. They [37:41] claimed the defense forces pressed [37:42] buttons and nothing worked, disabling [37:44] both Russian and Chinese-made rockets [37:46] and radar. [37:50] If we affected both mechanical equipment [37:52] and personnel, he also referred to it at [37:55] He also referred to a sonic weapon being [37:57] used against Maduro's Cuban security [37:59] detail inside a heavily fortified [38:02] fortress. [38:03] [ __ ] a man. [38:05] >> I would love to see what that looks [38:06] like, you know? I bet they have video, [38:09] too. How about these guys? Sure. [38:10] >> Yeah. [38:11] >> All wearing GoPros. [38:12] >> I'd love to go into a skiff. Just show [38:13] me the video. I won't say nothing. I [38:15] want to see what it looks like. I just [38:16] want to watch what does it look like [38:18] when somebody gets zapped by sound and [38:20] gets fully disabled. Like apparently [38:22] they just fell to the ground in agony. [38:24] They couldn't move. [38:25] >> Yeah. [38:25] >> And they just went in and shot [38:26] everybody. [38:27] >> Some freaking SF snipers are just [38:28] freaking on top of that just raining [38:30] down on them. It's [38:31] >> crazy. Like that guy thought he was [38:33] safe. Crazy. And there's a famous video [38:36] of him saying, "Come and get me." [38:37] >> Oh yeah, [38:38] >> bro. [38:38] >> Yeah. Be careful. Don't what bear you [38:41] poke. [38:42] >> Yeah. Also, it's like we none of us know [38:45] what the tip of the spear technology and [38:48] weapon systems is available right now. [38:50] We don't know. They don't tell us. They [38:52] don't tell us. Obviously, no one knew [38:54] that this [ __ ] discombobulator thing [38:56] existed. [38:57] >> This is science fiction. [38:58] >> Yeah. [38:58] >> Right. If this was 20 years ago, you'd [39:00] be like, "That's not a real thing." [39:02] >> But now you're like, "Oh [ __ ] they used [39:04] it. It's not not just a concept. They [39:06] [ __ ] used it. What else? What are [39:07] they what are they cooking out in the [39:08] desert in the middle of Nevada? Who [39:10] knows? [39:12] >> Yeah. And think about this. For that to [39:13] be used, there's something four [39:16] generations past that [39:17] >> 100% [39:17] >> that they're playing with now. [39:18] >> Yeah. 100%. You know, this whole UAP [39:23] world stuff like when they start talking [39:27] about UAPs, all of my [ __ ] alarms go [39:29] off. All of them. It's like I don't [39:32] believe if you knew things you would [39:34] tell us. So, I don't believe you're [39:36] telling us the truth. I think they have [39:39] some special access programs that [39:42] they've been working on for decades and [39:44] decades and some super highlevel [ __ ] [39:48] that involves some sort of novel [39:50] propulsion system and they have that [39:52] stuff flying around in the sky. And I [39:54] think that's what a lot of people are [39:56] saying. That's what a lot of people are [39:57] saying. That doesn't discount the idea [39:59] that there's something else out there [40:00] because I think there is. But I think [40:02] there's a giant chunk of the [ __ ] that [40:04] people are seeing that's ours. [40:06] >> Yeah. Testing. [40:07] >> Yeah. Testing. Doing stuff with it. [40:10] >> If there was an intelligent life form [40:11] that had stumbled upon our barbaric [40:14] asses, why would they not go, "Hey guys, [40:17] fire up that [ __ ] missile and take we [40:19] found this blue planet. We got to get [40:20] rid of this thing." [40:21] >> Well, I think maybe every intelligent [40:24] species that's tribal and territorial [40:27] has to go through an adolescent period [40:29] of their evolution. And if you look at [40:32] human history, you know, I was reading [40:34] about Vlad the Impaler last night. Jesus [40:37] Christ. And how how many of the Ottoman [40:39] Turks that got killed and his famous [40:42] methods of putting people on posts and [40:45] separating them down the line on the [40:47] road so that as these poor guys are [40:49] traveling to go and fight him, they just [40:51] see the enemy stuck on skewers and in [40:54] geometric patterns and [ __ ] He would do [40:56] them in like stars and stuff. Just he [40:58] was a vicious [ __ ] and he's the [41:00] the motivation behind or the, you know, [41:02] the inspiration behind Dracula. [41:05] >> And I was reading about that guy. I'm [41:06] like, [ __ ] People have always been [41:08] awful. They've always been awful, but [41:11] they just like as time goes on, they get [41:14] a little less awful. A little less. Like [41:16] we're a little less awful now than we [41:18] were during Nazi Germany. Not totally [41:22] great. [41:23] >> Not collectively. Certain. [41:25] >> We're still willing to do genocide. Some [41:27] of us are, but it's less less approved. [41:30] It's less [41:32] more people are horrified at it. It's [41:34] like human beings are getting a little [41:35] bit better. It's it's not as quick as [41:37] we'd like. And I think if I was an alien [41:40] life form, I would say you have to wait [41:42] this out. It's like if you have a kid, [41:44] you got to let the kid fall down and [41:45] stumb stumble. You got to let him get [41:47] hurt. You got to let things happen. You [41:49] got to let him [ __ ] up and figure it out [41:51] himself. You got to figure this out. [41:52] Make it right. You [ __ ] this up. You [41:54] got to give them a chance to become [41:56] better, [41:57] >> right? [41:57] >> I think as a civilization, I would think [41:59] the same thing would apply. You have to [42:01] give this civilization time to evolve [42:03] and adapt and get past where it's at [42:06] right now. And I don't think that you do [42:08] that by intervening and like grabbing us [42:10] by the hand and showing us the way. I [42:12] think what you do is you hang back and [42:15] make sure that we don't nuke each other [42:18] and just sort of pay attention to all [42:21] the different international ongoings and [42:24] just let human beings slowly but surely [42:27] evolve. [42:28] >> Yeah, [42:28] >> that's what I would do if I was a [42:30] intelligent life form observing people. [42:32] The interesting thing that we're as a [42:35] civilization facing now and and it's [42:38] always happened in some capacity when a [42:40] society gets [42:42] wealthy, really wealthy, and people [42:44] start to question wealth and how can we [42:47] be more equitable and and it comes [42:49] across like compassion, but it really [42:51] comes down to a debate of what is more [42:54] valuable to a society. Is [42:55] self-determination more valuable or is [42:59] equity more valuable? And by equity, [43:01] what I mean is everyone gets exactly the [43:04] same [ __ ] Everyone. So you take them [43:07] off of We're not on a monetary society [43:09] anymore. Now you're working for the [43:11] collective. And you're hearing that word [43:12] thrown around a lot, [43:13] >> right, [43:14] >> these days. The problem with working for [43:16] the collective is um who decides who [43:19] picks up the trash and who decides who [43:22] gets to [43:24] go represent your nation at the [43:26] Olympics? who gets to decide who gets to [43:29] um is someone going to let me go make TV [43:33] shows, which by the way I wouldn't do [43:34] for free. It's too [ __ ] hard, [43:36] >> right? [43:36] >> Um so now I don't want to do it. [43:39] >> Well then you got to go do do this. [43:40] Well, I don't want to do that either. [43:42] >> And that's the problem. [43:43] >> And then they force you to do things. [43:44] And then how do they do that? They do [43:45] that with guns. [43:46] >> Yeah. So then so so the you either have [43:50] self-determination or in your attempt to [43:53] be collective you have to surrender that [43:56] and then you're surrendering it to who [43:59] and and now you have a dictatorship no [44:00] matter what the [ __ ] you thought you [44:02] had. [44:02] >> Yeah. [44:03] >> It always comes back to that. It always [44:05] you can you can look at [44:08] >> Marxism and Leninism and what Linen was [44:11] talking about his hopes whether they [44:13] were his hopes or not. Um but it it [44:16] devolved into uh an authoritarian regime [44:20] very very quickly and and you know [44:22] communism, socialism, fascism, uh [44:25] Nazism, they're all very very similar. [44:29] The differences are superficial. I think [44:30] Ann Ran said that they're just [44:32] superficial variations between the exact [44:34] same thing which is the evil of the [44:37] collective. [44:38] >> The evil of the collective and human [44:40] beings desire to control their people. [44:41] >> Yeah. They love to they and and anytime [44:44] you give them a chance where they could [44:45] feel righteous about controlling people, [44:46] they jump at it and they can they have [44:49] an opportunity to classify people. [44:52] There's good people and bad people. And [44:53] the bad people, you can do whatever you [44:54] want to them. They're the other. And [44:57] that that happens with every every time [45:00] groups get into power like that and tell [45:02] you what you can and can't do. And [45:04] you're seeing that being embraced [45:07] shockingly more and more all over the [45:10] world. people are embracing more [45:11] government power and more government [45:13] control and it's really crazy. It's [45:16] really crazy to see. [45:17] >> It's unique. I think that [45:21] number one I think in 30 years when they [45:24] look back like we are still suffering [45:26] from a society [45:29] uh from COVID like still and and not so [45:32] much from the disease itself but from [45:37] our faith in the institutions around us [45:39] whether it's government whether it's the [45:41] media whether it's pharmaceutical [45:43] companies um and [45:47] the the way that it was manipulated to [45:50] gain power for a political group and it [45:55] was effective and so when something's [45:57] effective then people just keep doing [45:58] the same thing until it's no longer [46:00] effective right um we did that in our [46:04] military with the wind's hearts and [46:05] minds right so that was all that all [46:08] comes from Japan right we're going to [46:10] win the hearts and minds of Japanese [46:11] well the Japanese surrendered like their [46:13] emperor who they looked at as a god [46:15] He told the people of Japan after we [46:19] dropped two freaking nuclear bombs on [46:21] them, hey, we are going to endure the [46:22] unendurable. We are going to surrender. [46:24] It's the only way that we can salvage [46:27] our nation. So, they willfully [46:29] surrendered. And then our government [46:31] goes, "Look how great this hearts and [46:33] mind stuff's working. It's not working. [46:35] It's not working at all." And then they [46:37] tried it in Vietnam, didn't work. Tried [46:40] it everywhere else that we've had a [46:41] conflict. We've tried it and it hasn't [46:43] worked yet because what it was based on [46:45] was flawed, right? Because they they [46:48] chose to be subjugated at that time and [46:51] and making that choice kept them an [46:52] independent nation. [46:55] So our our our [46:58] government our and it's so dangerous [47:01] what we're seeing. Um you can like Trump [47:03] or not like Trump. It doesn't [47:06] people are going to like presidents and [47:07] dislike presidents. But [47:11] now it defying the rule of law because [47:15] he happens to be the head of the federal [47:18] government and openly defying the [47:20] federal government. The repercussions of [47:22] that are going to be, okay, fine. You [47:25] you can't stand this man. You think he's [47:27] a terrible president and you're not [47:29] going to follow his laws. But that's the [47:31] new normal now. So when a president gets [47:33] in that you do support, then the other [47:35] side because we've established this [47:37] precedent, they're just not going to [47:38] follow his laws either, [47:39] >> right? [47:39] >> And now we've eroded the rule of law. [47:42] And yeah, and then then what happens? [47:45] >> The slippery slope is very dangerous. [47:48] >> It's I mean, I was saying that when the [47:50] ICE raids were going on cuz I was like, [47:52] okay, I am not in favor of illegal [47:56] criminals being in this country. [47:58] However, we're setting a very alarming [48:00] precedent where you have masked [48:04] militarized police with no ID that are [48:08] running around the cities snatching [48:11] people up like this. This could set a [48:14] precedent that could be used by the left [48:16] if they get into power for something [48:18] different than this being than just for [48:20] ICE. We've already accepted the idea of [48:23] militarized police on our streets and [48:25] that people with seven weeks training, [48:28] you're just sending them out to snatch [48:29] up people and a lot of American citizens [48:32] are getting caught up in that trap too [48:34] unfortunately and then they have to get [48:36] released. Like that that could be bad if [48:41] if the next party gets in. So if the [48:44] Democrats get in next and they decide [48:46] like maybe there's a new vac a new COVID [48:49] strain happens, some new pandemic [48:52] happens, whatever the [ __ ] [48:53] >> and if you don't get the vaccine, [48:54] they're going to arrest you and then [48:54] they start the same. [48:56] >> Yes, we saw it in I think it was [48:58] Minnesota or whoever they had the [49:00] National Guard on the streets, but they [49:01] had people enforcing lockdowns and so [49:04] they had people walking down the streets [49:06] with [ __ ] guns, yelling at people to [49:08] get in your house over a cold [49:11] >> like this. these kind of slippery [49:14] slopes. You might think, "No, we're just [49:15] trying to get rid of the bad [49:16] immigrants." I get it. I'm with you. I [49:20] agree. However, the way they're doing [49:23] it, doing it, and I don't know, I'm not [49:25] even saying there's another way or a [49:27] better way. I'm just saying you want to [49:28] get them out all at once, yeah, that's [49:30] the way to do it. You want to get them [49:31] out quick, that's the way to do it [49:33] because they got them in quick. You're [49:34] right. They opened the [ __ ] border. [49:36] They helped people get in. But now that [49:38] they're in the if you're going to get [49:40] them out that way, you're setting a [49:42] weird precedent, you're setting a [49:44] precedent that could be used in other [49:46] ways. [49:46] >> Yeah. That's the the the challenge is, [49:50] okay, [49:52] we're going to we need to enforce the [49:53] law, right? Or don't have them, right? [49:55] They've they've enacted no new laws. [49:57] These are the same immigration laws that [49:58] were on the books when Obama was [50:00] president and Clinton was president. The [50:02] same the same rules. It's the It's the [50:04] methodology and and uh yeah, you gotta [50:10] you got to sit there and weigh the pros [50:12] and cons about okay the pros of trying [50:15] to eradicate this issue. You can't give [50:17] it a deadline. [50:18] >> Yeah. [50:18] >> Right. Um [50:20] >> it's slippery. It is slippery and and [50:23] again it's what's good for the goose is [50:24] good for the gander and and these [50:27] politicians right now who are doing all [50:29] of us a tremendous disservice in [50:31] Washington. I feel our elected officials [50:34] um because they're they're not thinking [50:38] beyond this next election and maybe they [50:40] never have. [50:41] >> They never have. [50:42] >> Right. But they were better at hiding [50:43] it. Maybe [50:44] >> I think there was no internet [50:46] >> but well true. [50:46] >> I think that's what it is. There was no [50:48] social media. [50:48] >> But I think we've reached a point as [50:50] they as they as politicians talk about [50:52] eliminating the electoral college. They [50:54] talk about eliminating the filibuster, [50:57] eliminate packing courts, all these [50:58] things because their side's not in [51:00] power. And so we're just going to take [51:01] the structure of the government and [51:03] totally rework it to benefit us [51:05] temporarily, but then those same [51:07] benefits that you have now will be used [51:09] against you. [51:10] >> They will 100% be used against you. I [51:13] think the most important legislation [51:15] that we can pass right now is term [51:18] limits. [51:19] >> I think I think 12 years tops in [51:23] Congress and I think probably 12 years [51:24] in the Senate. Two six-year terms in the [51:26] Senate. [51:28] >> That's more than enough time. That's a [51:30] lot of [ __ ] time. [51:31] >> That's enough. We don't We don't need [51:32] any anyone else. I mean, I don't know [51:34] how it's become [51:36] >> How the [ __ ] is Nancy Pelosi worth $400 [51:38] million? [51:39] >> How the [ __ ] Well, I know how. Yeah. [51:41] She gets in on all these [ __ ] IPOs. [51:43] >> Exactly. [51:44] >> Right. She's going to pass the [51:45] legislation that allows Visa to go [51:47] public and then she's going to get a big [51:49] chunk of it and then when she's [51:51] confronted about it, look a reporter [51:52] dead in the eye and [ __ ] lie to him. [51:54] >> I don't know what you're talking about. [51:55] I didn't do that. It's public. We know [51:57] you did it. We could look at how much [51:58] stock you own. [51:59] >> Yeah. [52:00] >> [ __ ] liar. [52:00] >> They all do it. [52:01] >> Yes. They get [52:02] >> People are calling out Roana on Twitter [52:04] today. [52:04] >> [ __ ] rich. Everyone's getting rich. [52:06] >> They get paid 175 grand a year and [52:08] they're all [ __ ] millionaires. [52:09] >> Super millionaires. They're all like [52:11] like she's intensely wealthy. That's [52:13] that's a that's a almost a half a [52:14] billion dollars. That's nuts. As a [52:16] public servant, that's nuts. [52:18] >> Yeah. It's it's insanity. [52:20] >> And it's um you know, that's what we're [52:23] used to. We're just we we just we know [52:26] it's bad and we just accept it and [52:28] people are busy and they have families [52:30] and mortgages and [ __ ] to deal with and [52:32] so they complain and they keep on [52:33] trucking. [52:35] >> Yeah. I mean I have as we discussed I [52:37] have other jobs. I don't have a pile of [52:40] time to dedicate to gets tough for me to [52:42] talk politics because I don't have hours [52:45] in my day to sift through what's real [52:47] and not real on Instagram or social [52:49] whatever. I'm not on that [ __ ] [52:50] But I can't. It's hard to form an [52:52] opinion because man, I don't know and I [52:54] don't know where to go to get honest [52:56] news. I'm not the news. I know that. I [52:59] can't turn on the [ __ ] news cuz they [53:02] [ __ ] been lying to us. [53:05] They they stopped being I don't know if [53:07] they were ever impartial. I But but I [53:09] know I know that. Um I remember there [53:14] was a guy I was a kid. He was running [53:16] for president. His name was Jack Kemp. [53:20] >> I remember Jack Kemp. [53:21] >> And I want to say it was Dan Rather. It [53:24] may not have been. It may have been some [53:25] other newscaster. And there's a debate [53:29] amongst all these different potential [53:32] candidates for president. And [53:35] as he's introducing all of these various [53:38] politicians, he's saying so and so [53:40] Harvard graduate and law professor from [53:42] here and this former senator and this [53:44] and that and the other and this person [53:45] here. And they get to Jack Kemp and he [53:47] goes, "Backup quarterback and born again [53:49] Christian Jack Kemp." I'm like, "Wow, [53:53] you just sunk that dude. [53:55] Everyone else you gave what their jobs [53:57] were and and talked about their [53:59] accomplishments and this. You just said [54:00] he didn't start at quarterback and he's [54:02] you called that his religion, dude." And [54:04] that's the first time I ever remember. [54:07] I'm like, "I know your opinion. I'm not [54:09] supposed to know your opinion. You're [54:10] supposed to be you're supposed to be [54:12] giving me news, [54:13] >> right? You're supposed to be giving me [54:15] honest, unbiased information so I can [54:18] make a decision and you're making a [54:19] decision for me or trying to. [54:21] >> Yeah. [54:21] >> And they've gotten so as news became [54:24] entertainment. I mean, CNN's the worst [54:25] thing that ever happened to news because [54:27] it's 24 hours and now all of a sudden [54:29] >> there's not 24 hours worth of news all [54:31] the time, right? There is during a war, [54:33] right? You can show us news, you know, [54:35] war footage the whole time and talk [54:37] about the war and why war and why no [54:38] war, but when there's not, you got to [54:40] make some [ __ ] up or push an opinion. [54:42] And that's where we've gotten with news [54:44] now. Now it's news is piss them off and [54:49] scare the [ __ ] out of them. [54:50] >> Yeah. [54:50] >> That's how we keep them watching. [54:52] >> And that's the business model. [54:53] >> It is now. [54:54] >> And it's also piss them off and scare [54:56] the [ __ ] out of them, but ignore certain [54:58] things that your sponsors wouldn't like [55:00] you to talk about. [55:01] >> Oh yeah. This is why you know Tulsi [55:03] Gabbard and in her final act as um [55:07] director of national intelligence as [55:09] she's leaving she had that she gave that [55:12] press conference about Fouchy [55:14] >> and she talked about how he lied in [55:16] front of Congress and that he absolutely [55:19] used American tax funds to fund gain of [55:21] function research through Ecoalth [55:23] Alliance and through the Wuhan lab and [55:26] Wuhan China and you know no one's [55:29] covering it. This episode is brought to [55:31] you by Visible. How many of you are [55:34] currently listening to this podcast on [55:36] your phone? If you are chronically [55:38] online, like most of us are these days, [55:41] your wireless network should be too. [55:43] With Visible, you get unlimited 5G and [55:47] unlimited hotspot. All powered by [55:50] Verizon's 5G network. The perks of big [55:54] wireless for half the cost. Visible [55:57] isn't just a wireless plan. It's [55:59] unlimited wireless designed to keep you [56:02] connected and no contract holding you [56:05] back. Switch today at visible.com. [56:08] Plans start at just $25 a month. Or get [56:12] our premium Visible Plus Pro plan and [56:15] save $10 on your first month when you [56:18] use promo code Rogan, an exclusive offer [56:22] for podcast listeners. [56:24] >> No. And by the way, didn't we all know [56:27] that already? Well, we knew it, but my [56:30] parents didn't. People that just like [56:33] just read the newspapers and watch TV, [56:36] they don't know. [56:37] >> I I've never seen anything as [56:41] flagrantly obvious as as CO coming from [56:46] the Wuhan lab studying COVID. [56:48] >> Right. [56:48] >> Right. I've never And you've got [ __ ] [56:52] news anchors keeping a straight face [56:54] saying it came from the wet market. Did [56:56] you ever see John Stewart's bid on it [56:58] that he did on the Cobar show? No. You [56:59] never saw it? No. Oh, we we need to play [57:01] it. Let's play it because it's so funny [57:03] because Colbert tries to like stop him [57:05] from doing it and push back and John, [57:07] he's a great comic. He just gets up from [57:09] his chair and gets louder and just plows [57:12] through it [57:13] >> over Cobar's like trying to [ __ ] block [57:16] his bit. He's like it's like it's a [57:17] funny bit and he's getting in the way. [57:20] I'd like to see if you have information [57:21] on that. I'd like to see it. And he just [57:22] keeps going. He keeps plowing away. It's [57:25] very funny and it's in the middle of it, [57:27] right? He was a This was a courageous [57:29] step because he was doing this when [57:31] calling it out and saying that it came [57:34] from a lab in Wuhan, China was somehow [57:36] or another conflated with racism. [57:39] Remember that? Like if you said it came [57:41] from Wuhan, China from a lab, you're [57:43] racist. Like how did you pull that off? [57:47] Like how it's like no one's saying [57:49] anything. It's racist. It's like it's [57:51] from [ __ ] China and it seems like Eco [57:53] Health Alliance funded it and it seems [57:55] like we funded Eco Health Alliance. [57:57] There's a lot of [ __ ] paperwork [57:59] >> and and by the way, there's studies on [58:01] the [ __ ] disease. Yeah. [58:02] >> That they've been doing that are posted [58:04] on the CDC website. [58:06] >> They're posted on the [ __ ] my [58:07] favorite was when you catch all this [58:09] [ __ ] about Ivormectin. Yeah. And and [58:11] literally when when that happened, I [58:13] went I [ __ ] look that up. look up [58:15] ivormectin and studies with ivormectin [58:18] and a study pops up on the on the CDC [58:21] website while people are telling us to [58:23] not take that [ __ ] [58:24] >> and it and it talks about the efficacy [58:26] of ivormectin anti and antiviral [58:29] properties specifically co 19. Yeah. So [58:33] it's on the government website that the [58:35] [ __ ] drug works [58:38] >> while they're telling everyone to not [58:40] take it [58:40] >> and they're mocking me for taking horse [58:42] dewormer. Watch this. This is great. [58:44] This is great. [58:46] >> No, you you stop because he still wants [58:48] to put out that establishment position. [58:51] I'd like to see any evidence if you've [58:53] got any evidence. [58:58] >> Yeah. Well, wild times in the news [59:01] because I think from then on that sort [59:04] of sent a shock wave through the [59:06] majority of the population where it just [59:08] whatever trust they had in the news just [59:10] got [59:11] >> severely eroded. Yeah. And if we don't [59:13] have good news, if we don't have trust [59:15] in the news, then we're kind of a drift. [59:17] And then you get locked into [ __ ] [59:19] conspiracy theories and eco chambers [59:21] online and you can get trapped in them, [59:23] too. And that's not good either. [59:25] >> Yeah. Then then there's nowhere to go [59:27] get information. [59:29] >> Has anybody in NBC, CBS, CNN, have any [59:33] of those people picked up on that Tulsi [59:35] Gabbard speech about [59:39] Fouchy and had any sort of a reaction to [59:41] it? [59:42] I'd like to know that because from what [59:44] I was reading online, no, none of them [59:47] had. But this was as of yesterday. I [59:50] don't know whether or not that's [59:51] changed. I don't know if like they were [59:53] preparing an article and they wanted to [59:54] make sure that they got all their ducks [59:56] in a row. [59:57] I would think pretty much anytime [60:01] the head of an institute [60:03] is begging [60:06] for a pardon when he hasn't been charged [60:08] with any crime is is pretty good [60:11] indicator you might want to look and see [60:12] if there's been a crime committed. [60:13] >> Was he begging for a pardon? I mean, he [60:15] got [60:15] >> Yeah. Fouchy Fouchy was like he had he [60:18] had attorneys this is in part of that [60:19] deal. He had attorneys [60:22] >> reaching out to Biden's camp the last [60:24] day when he got the pardon. Gez, the [60:27] very last day. [60:28] >> Geez, [60:29] >> it's just a preemptive pardon is nuts. [60:32] Especially when when Rand Paul's [60:34] questioning him and he's talking to him [60:36] about specifically about what what [60:38] defines gain of function research. And [60:40] by all account, by every definition, [60:43] it's gain of function research. And [60:45] Fouchi is still saying, "You do not know [60:48] what you are talking about." With all [60:51] due respect, [60:52] >> even though Even though he's a doctor. [60:54] >> Yeah. Grandpa's a [ __ ] doctor and an [60:56] actual doctor. And then they say, "Well, [60:57] you're an eye doctor." Well, that's my [60:59] specialty. But before I became an eye [61:01] doctor, I became a general doctor, which [61:02] means I studied all the same [ __ ] that [61:04] Fouchy studied. Yeah. [61:05] >> You had to go through medical school [61:06] before you go pick a specialty. So, four [61:09] years of studying the entire body before [61:12] you specialize in whatever you're going [61:15] to specialize in. [61:15] >> Well, it's also then if you read RFK [61:18] Jr.'s book, The Real Anthony Fouchy. You [61:20] find out he ran this exact same playbook [61:22] during the AIDS pandemic. [61:24] >> Was the exact same playbook. That's what [61:26] the Dallas Buyers Club is about. The [61:28] Dallas Buyers Club, that McConnA movie [61:31] about AIDS. The [ __ ] villain is [61:33] Anthony Fouchy. He's the guy that's [61:35] stopping them from getting alternative [61:37] medications. That's the guy that wanted [61:39] everybody to take ACT. You know why? [61:41] Because ACT had already been approved. [61:43] They had already used it as a cancer [61:45] medication. It was a chemotherapy [61:46] medication that they stopped using [61:48] because it was too deadly. It was [61:50] killing people quicker than cancer was [61:51] killing them. So the first medication [61:53] they gave people when they had an immune [61:55] system that was compromised was a [61:56] chemotherapy medication that was killing [61:59] people. And they were giving it to [62:01] people that were asymptomatic. They were [62:02] giving giving it to people that tested [62:04] HIV positive. And then you know about [62:06] the PCR testing. So, the PTR says, [62:08] Carrie Mullis, the guy who invented PCR [62:11] testing, said publicly about Fouchy does [62:13] not know what the [ __ ] he's talking [62:14] about. I don't think he said [ __ ] but [62:16] he does not know what he's talking [62:17] about. And that it's not supposed to be [62:19] used to detect a disease in a person's [62:22] body. And that if you ramp up the cycles [62:24] long enough, just like they did with [62:26] COVID, where we got some by some [62:29] estimations 80% false positives because [62:31] of the PCR method because they were [62:33] ramping them up so high and so they cut [62:35] it back quite significantly and that [62:37] reduced the amount of false positives [62:39] they had. But there's a lot of people [62:41] that got tested as HIV positive that [62:44] probably weren't and they put those [62:46] [ __ ] people on ACT and ACT kills you. [62:51] >> Wow. [62:53] Yeah, nuts. Most mainstream outlets are [62:55] treating it as a serious but unproven [62:58] political bombshell. They're reporting [63:00] that Gabbard alleges what Gabbard [63:03] alleges, stressing the documents are [63:05] disputed and under review and [63:07] highlighting how polarized the reaction [63:09] is. [63:11] Mainstream print Jerusalem Post Money [63:15] Control Newsweek summarized her [63:16] accusations, emphasized that CO's [63:18] origins remain unresolved and note that [63:20] the claims about Fouchi sparking COVID [63:23] or lying under oath are heavily [63:25] contested, not yet legally validated. [63:28] Many stories frame this as reigniting a [63:30] longunning fight over lab leak versus [63:33] natural origin. Listen, that fight is [63:35] over, kids. That fight's over. this. If [63:38] you're saying if you are in the news and [63:41] you are saying that there's still a long [63:43] running controversy as to whether it's a [63:46] lab leak or natural origin, shut your [63:49] [ __ ] dirty [ __ ] mouth because it's [63:52] not. There's the fight's over. It's a [63:54] [ __ ] lab leak. They say the new [63:56] documents will need independent scrutiny [63:59] from Congress, investigators, and [64:01] scientists before any firm conclusions [64:03] can be drawn. [64:05] Okay. [64:07] Right- leaning media highlight her file [64:09] dump as vindication for critics, focus [64:11] on the coverup narrative, and give [64:13] prominent space to Republicans like Ran [64:15] Paul. Why does it more centrist or [64:18] mainstream outlets present it as a [64:20] straighter news tone, often pairing [64:21] Gabbards and GOP's quotes with Fouch's [64:24] past denials, and nothing? There is so [64:26] far no judicial finding, a perjury, or [64:29] criminal conduct. [64:30] >> What I've never understood is how this [64:32] became a left or right issue. [64:33] >> So stupid. when when Fouchy, who's a a [64:38] career bureaucrat, [64:40] >> right, through I mean, when all this [64:42] started, there was a Republican [64:44] president. Yep. [64:45] >> Right. And then he's he's served that [64:47] Republican president. He served the [64:48] Democratic president before that and [64:50] before that and then he served a [64:52] Republican. I mean, he's been there for [64:53] [ __ ] 50 years. [64:55] >> Yeah. [64:55] >> It's been there. [64:56] >> This dude, it's not political. [64:58] >> It It shouldn't be political. There [65:00] shouldn't be a right left side of this. [65:01] It's, hey, a career bureaucrat [ __ ] [65:04] lied to us. [65:05] >> He used the exact same language when he [65:08] was talking about ACT as a medication [65:10] for HIV that he used for the COVID [65:12] vaccine. The reason why it's the only [65:15] medication is because it is both safe [65:18] and effective. [65:21] Guy's a monster. [65:22] >> Yeah. So lit like he's one of those guys [65:24] like throughout history where you're [65:26] going to look back over time and you go, [65:28] "Holy [ __ ] this one guy's lies, this [65:31] one guy's aspirations, this one guy's [65:33] career [ __ ] so many people over." [65:37] >> Yeah. And I don't and I don't understand [65:39] why Democrats would want to fall on that [65:43] sword with there's no reason to align [65:44] >> because people are stupid and they just [65:46] decide that because a Republican's a [65:48] president and the anything the [65:50] Republicans are pushing has to be bad. [65:52] And that that stupid [ __ ] division. [65:55] It's so it's so silly. It's so silly. It [65:58] really is because the same people during [66:01] Trump's presidency were openly saying, [66:04] "Are you going to trust a vaccine that's [66:06] created under Trump?" They were all [66:07] saying it. [66:08] >> Kla Harris said it. A bunch of Joy Reid [66:10] said they all said it [66:13] >> and and then they then they bet their [66:15] entire political livelihoods on it. [66:19] >> We deserve better. We really do. Or we [66:22] don't. Maybe we don't. We [ __ ] think [66:24] they're good. I We're so silly. Such a [66:27] [ __ ] silly group of human beings we [66:29] are. [66:30] >> That's [ __ ] wild, man. [66:31] >> Not all of us though, you know. I think [66:33] less of us now. I think um it's it's [66:36] going to be way harder to divide people [66:38] the way they divided everybody in 2020. [66:40] It'll be way harder now. I think most [66:43] people are just not buying it. And as [66:45] long as people wake up to this left [66:47] versus right nonsense is really just a [66:49] big [ __ ] hustle to keep you fighting [66:51] with each other. [66:52] >> Oh, most of it. [66:53] >> Oh, for sure. [66:54] >> Most of it. Even the ICE stuff that we [66:56] were talking about. Hey folks, do you [66:58] think it's a coincidence that the [66:59] biggest [ __ ] ICE protests were all [67:02] going on in the same place where they [67:03] found all that fraud? Do you ever occur [67:07] to you? It occurred to you that these [67:09] organized massive protests were all [67:12] occurring in the same place where that [67:14] Nick Shirley cat found [ __ ] billions [67:17] of dollars in fraud. [67:18] >> Yeah. [67:19] >> Shocker. Kind of crazy. Didn't they pass [67:22] Didn't California pass a law [67:25] >> a Nick Shirley law [67:26] >> to prevent that that specifically that [67:29] guy from [ __ ] poking around in [67:31] California? [67:31] >> Yes. Yes. I mean they've even referred [67:33] to it as the Nick Shirley law. The idea [67:36] is to keep people from investigating [67:38] fraud, which is outlandish. That is [67:41] outrageous. That is a crazy thing to [67:44] emphasize. And the thing is, well, you [67:46] these people are showing up at daycarees [67:48] and looking in. Right. They shouldn't. [67:50] You're right. I 100% and people random [67:53] people from the internet should not be [67:55] showing up at daycarees with cameras. I [67:57] agree. However, [67:59] when there's no one in that daycare for [68:02] years and years and years and they can [68:05] prove that [ __ ] millions of dollars [68:08] are being earned by that daycare and [68:09] there's no one in there, it gets a [68:10] little weird. [68:11] >> Isn't there a Isn't there [68:12] >> It's not fully passed into law. Not yet. [68:15] Isn't there a video of that kid like [68:17] walking up to one of these and these [68:19] dudes get out and like drive off in [68:21] their [ __ ] Bentleys? [68:22] >> I don't know if those are real. There's [68:24] a bunch of fake videos that were made by [68:26] people afterwards that were just [68:28] capitalizing on people wanting to click [68:30] on something like that. And so they were [68:31] just engagement farming by pretending [68:34] like the guy would show up and they'd [68:36] go, "What? What are you talking about? I [68:37] don't I have no idea what this bad [68:39] acting." And they get in a Rolls-Royce [68:41] like [68:42] >> it's just [ __ ] It seemed like [68:43] [ __ ] to me. I I mean, I'm sure a [68:46] bunch of those guys made a bunch of [68:47] money and I'm sure there is a lot of [68:49] fraud. It just like they're admitting [68:52] it. Minnesota's admitting it. They knew [68:54] it was going on forever, you know. And [68:57] then how about the fact that there's [68:59] certain politicians that voted uh [69:01] against this idea. So, one of those [69:04] ladies that was killed, like there was a [69:06] lady and her husband that were murdered [69:08] in Minnesota and she was one of the few [69:13] people that voted against providing [69:16] Medicare for illegals. They were trying [69:19] to they were trying to pass some bill [69:21] involving Medicare and illegals and she [69:23] was one of the ones that voted against [69:24] it and she was killed. The guy who [69:27] killed her said that Tim Waltz sent him [69:32] to kill them. Now, I don't know if he's [69:35] full of [ __ ] He easily could be. He's a [69:37] [ __ ] crazy person. He's a murderer. [69:39] He showed up at their house with a mask [69:40] on and [ __ ] shot them dead and shot a [69:43] couple other people, too. [69:44] >> It's like he's, you know, obviously he's [69:46] [ __ ] cracked out. But kind of weird [69:50] kind of weird that the lady who wants to [69:52] vote against this obvious fraud, this [69:56] money that's being somehow another [69:57] funneled around through Medicare, like [70:00] one of the things that Elon said when he [70:01] was on the podcast is that Medicaid and [70:03] Medicare fraud is one of the biggest [70:05] [ __ ] problems. And he was looking [70:07] into with Doge. He goes, "I almost don't [70:09] want to talk about it because I don't [70:10] want to get killed." He goes, "It's that [70:12] bad." [70:14] And this was before all this Nick [70:15] Shirley [ __ ] And now you're seeing it [70:17] and you're like, "Oh, now I get it." [70:19] These hospices that they have, these [70:21] fake hospices in California, and then [70:24] these all the Somali daycare centers and [70:26] all the different things. Like, these [70:28] people are just make autism, the autism [70:30] diagnosises went through the [ __ ] [70:32] roof because now they could have these [70:34] autism centers so they just diagnose [70:36] their kids as autistic and then they're [70:37] raking in all this money for treatment. [70:40] It's crazy how much fraud there is. [70:43] >> Hundreds of billions. [70:44] >> Hundreds of billions of dollars. And [70:45] just what a shocker that that's the [70:47] place where the big ICE protest broke [70:49] out. [70:50] >> Oh, [70:50] >> people forget that when Obama was [70:53] president, he made a big public [70:55] statement about going after government [70:57] fraud. They were aware of it then. I [70:59] mean, they've been aware of it for it's [71:01] always taken place, but on the scale and [71:04] and he tried and he caught resistance to [71:07] the point that he wasn't able to do his [71:09] version of a Doge, [71:11] >> right, [71:11] >> which was which was his intention. He [71:13] gave a big public speech about it and [71:15] and tried to look into it and he's [71:19] if you're stealing hundreds of billions [71:22] of dollars, hundreds of billions of [71:25] dollars, what wouldn't you do to protect [71:27] that? [71:27] >> Exactly. And that was Elon's point. [71:29] >> Yeah. [71:30] >> And also that money for sure makes its [71:33] way into Democratic coffers and probably [71:35] Republican too. And who whoever the [ __ ] [71:37] is going to be [71:37] >> whoever's whoever's enabling the fry. [71:39] >> Who's ever going to who's ever going to [71:40] help out? Whoever wants a piece of this [71:42] pie is a juicy ass pie. It's a hundred [71:45] billion dollar pie. Come get something. [71:46] >> That'll almost bill you a rail system in [71:48] California. You can get a mile of track [71:52] >> or a second Google bridge [71:54] >> [ __ ] car salesman. Have you had that [71:55] guy on? [71:56] >> No. No. He wants to be on. I'm sure [71:58] >> he talks a lot of [ __ ] about me. At [72:00] first he was saying Joe Rogan is not a [72:01] fan of me, but I'm a big fan of him. He [72:03] was like saying all this. [72:04] >> Doesn't he have his own podcast? Yeah, [72:06] >> because that city, that state is running [72:08] so well. He the governor doesn't need a [72:10] lot of free time. It's so smooth. If you [72:12] ask him, he'll tell you. He'll tell you [72:13] how awesome this stats the stats are. [72:16] >> Statistically, people are moving there [72:17] in record numbers. [72:19] >> Yeah, that's not true. It's not true. [72:21] It's um it's uh the all the stats, the [72:24] positive stats, they were already going [72:25] on before he was the governor. It's it's [72:27] California is an awesome place. The [72:29] [ __ ] weather's perfect. San Francisco [72:31] has always been an incredible tech hub [72:33] of geniuses. There's always been a bunch [72:35] of super wizards up there that are [72:37] creating some of the best technology in [72:39] the world. And that has nothing to do [72:41] with him. Has zero to do with him and [72:44] all these problems that their inept [72:46] government has caused because that's the [72:49] real problem with him as a governor. [72:51] It's a real problem with Karen Bass as a [72:53] mayor. It's a real problem with whatever [72:55] the [ __ ] happened to San Francisco. It's [72:57] bad government. It's not upholding the [73:00] rule of the law, not keeping people [73:01] safe, being empathetic to people that [73:03] are shooting up on the street over [73:05] people that are trying to walk their [73:07] [ __ ] kids to school. [73:08] >> Yeah. [73:09] >> Like what you're doing is bad for [73:11] society. It's bad. And and it seems to [73:14] me [73:16] that for the most part, for the most [73:19] part, if you are the mayor of a city, [73:22] and and when I was writing Yellowstone, [73:25] the the governor of Montana at the time, [73:27] who was a Democrat, I I called him and [73:28] asked him uh I said, "Hey guys, talk to [73:32] you about what it's like to be a [73:33] governor. Like, what did you think it [73:35] would be and what did it turn out to [73:36] be?" And and what he said was, um, Steve [73:39] Bulock is his name. Uh he said well I [73:43] thought I was going to you know make all [73:47] these changes and do this and shepherd [73:48] this and I learned that I am the CEO of [73:51] a state and that my job as the CEO of [73:55] the state is take care of the people who [73:58] live in the state the employees of the [73:59] state attract business here attract [74:02] tourism here and try to make the state [74:04] make more money and make lives better. [74:08] That's my job. Infrastructure and city [74:11] management and people management and [74:13] tourism. That's my job. And to a even [74:17] more acutely to a mayor, you're really [74:20] the president of a city. You're the CEO [74:22] of the city. And your job is keep the [74:24] lights on, pick up the trash, put out [74:26] the fires, deal with the sewage, keep it [74:30] safe. Like that's it. There's no social [74:32] anything secondarily possibly. but run [74:36] the schools, like run the city. And and [74:39] you have in a lot of these big urban [74:40] areas where they're so agenda driven and [74:44] they're they're pushing a social agenda [74:46] and they're not running the cities. [74:48] They're not running them at all. And so [74:50] they're running into the ground. And [74:53] it's tragic to see because San [74:54] Francisco, like you said, it's a [74:55] beautiful city. LA used to be an an a [75:00] place where you could go and make your [75:01] dreams come true. [75:02] >> San Francisco was awesome 10 years ago. [75:04] Just 10 years ago, I I filmed my special [75:08] triggered in the Fillmore in San [75:11] Francisco in 2016. It was great. No [75:14] problems. It was not It was a homeless [75:16] people everywhere. It was normal. It was [75:18] normal San Francisco. Go to a cool [75:20] restaurant. People are cool. Always been [75:22] like a smart city. Interesting [75:24] architecture. Always been a great city. [75:26] I lived there from the time I was 7 to [75:28] 11. [75:28] >> Really? [75:29] >> Yeah. I loved San Francisco. It's [75:31] unrecognizable now. 10 years. That's it. [75:34] 10 years of [ __ ] asinine government. [75:38] And also [75:40] this homeless thing when you realize [75:42] that it's an industry when the [75:44] homelessness is valuable. Having [75:47] homeless people on the streets is [75:49] valuable because you can get more money [75:52] to deal with this obvious homeless [75:53] problem. The more obvious the problem [75:55] is, the more money they're going to [75:56] throw on it. They don't have to fix it. [75:58] >> Well, there's no there's no intention to [76:00] fix it, [76:00] >> right? [76:01] >> They're giving out free needles here. [76:03] Yeah, [76:04] >> get high here. It's And I was I was just [76:09] somewhere where my first experience [76:11] seeing the homeless in this magnitude. [76:16] And the one thing that's evident [76:18] instantly is they're all so completely [76:21] strung out on drugs. Like this fentanyl [76:23] thing is no [ __ ] joke. like the [76:26] zombies leaning against every corner of [76:29] and and and to me it's cruel, [76:32] >> right? Yeah. Like if if someone's to [76:35] that point you and you want to help [76:37] them, don't give them a [ __ ] iPhone [76:39] and some more needles, how about you [76:41] pick them up off the street [76:43] >> and you take them somewhere and go, [76:44] "Look, there's a curfew here and you [76:45] ain't doing no drugs, right? [76:46] >> We're gonna clean you out." Um and and [76:49] some aren't going to want that. they're [76:50] going to want to go back on the street [76:51] and do drugs and and the addiction and [76:55] the consequences of drugs that are that [76:57] I had surgery. They had put me on [76:59] fentanyl. I had neck surgery and they [77:01] put me on fentanyl. There's high. Then [77:03] there's that [ __ ] And that was done by [77:06] an anesthesiologist. I wasn't [77:07] self-medicating on a [ __ ] parking [77:09] lot, right? [77:10] >> What'd you get done to your neck? [77:11] >> Uh C6C7. I blew up [77:14] >> No, no, no, no, no. I had the [77:16] >> disc. Yeah. [77:17] >> Just cut some of it down. [77:18] >> Yeah. It's okay now. [77:19] >> Yeah. [77:20] >> How long ago did you get that done? [77:23] >> Was that maybe three years ago? [77:24] >> I wish I told you. [77:26] >> Yeah. Three years ago. [77:26] >> If that ever happens again, don't do [77:28] that. [77:28] >> Don't. [77:29] >> No. [77:29] >> Well, it'll happen. [77:30] >> There's Yeah, I'm sure it will. Um, [77:32] there's other ways. There's way. Yeah, [77:34] there's PRP can help it. Regenicine help [77:37] mine. I had a pretty bad bulging disc in [77:39] my neck. [77:40] >> What's Reen? Regenicine is um they used [77:43] to have to go to Germany to do it. Uh, I [77:45] know Payton Manning went there. or Kobe [77:46] Bryant went there and Dana White [77:48] actually flew to Germany to get it done. [77:50] Um, it is uh it's like an advanced form [77:53] of plateletri plasma where they take [77:55] your blood, they uh there's a process to [77:58] it. Pull it up, Jamie, because I can't [78:00] remember what the process is, but they [78:03] spin it in a centurfuge for like 10 [78:05] hours and then you come back the next [78:06] day and they inject it and it makes this [78:09] very potent anti-inflammatory and they [78:11] inject it around wherever the injury is [78:12] to the disc and uh it provides like [78:15] within weeks amazing relief and for me [78:19] it completely cured it. I I I had a [78:20] point my fingers were going numb. [78:22] >> Yeah, that's what [78:23] >> uh German [78:25] go back up back to where Yeah. So German [78:29] physician Dr. Peter Welling uh the [78:31] treatment focused on blocking a specific [78:32] inflammatory protein interlucan one. So [78:36] they take the blood out um they draw [78:38] your blood and then the blood is heated [78:40] to body temperature to trigger the [78:41] production of a natural [78:43] anti-inflammatory protein called IL1 [78:47] and then they spin it in a centrifuge uh [78:50] separating out the proteinrich serum. [78:52] The serum is then injected directly into [78:54] the painful joint or tissue. Dude, it [78:57] was remarkable for me for uh knee [78:59] injuries. I did it a bunch of times. I [79:02] used to do it at they they moved it. You [79:04] you used to have to go to Germany and [79:06] then Santa Monica. They opened up an [79:07] office. It's lifestyle medicine. That's [79:09] what it's called, right? Um and then um [79:13] that's where I had it done. And you it's [79:16] incredible. Like it I had it done my [79:18] entire back. Like there's a picture of [79:20] me on the on Instagram with a bunch of [79:22] these [ __ ] tubes in my That's me [79:23] right there. [79:24] >> Bunch of those tubes. my hairy ass back. [79:27] And uh it was incredible. I mean, it [79:30] really fixed so many problems that I [79:32] had. [79:34] It's uh really great for specifically [79:38] for back injuries, knee injuries, stuff [79:39] like that. There's a lot of good [79:41] biological options. There's also [79:43] decompression is very important. I have [79:46] a harness that I attach to a pull-up bar [79:48] and it straps under my chin and I just [79:50] like let my weight drop down and [79:52] decompress my weight on my neck. I do [79:54] that every day. And then I also have [79:56] this thing called a Dex 3. Is it Dex 2 [79:59] or Dex 3? Uh you you hang forward. Uh [80:02] it's like Teeter makes it. You know that [80:04] company that makes those decompression [80:06] tables, but this one's even better cuz [80:08] you just hinge from the hip. So you're [80:09] not supporting it at all with your legs [80:11] and it's just your back. It just goes [80:13] like pop pop. Like you could feel it. [80:15] >> I made one of those. [80:16] >> I'll show it to you. We have one out [80:17] here. We have two of them out here [80:18] actually. Really? [80:19] >> Right out Yeah. in the gym. It's they're [80:21] they're the [ __ ] I have one at home. I [80:22] don't I I will not not have one. I have [80:25] to have one. It's so good for just [80:27] decompressing your back. But you need to [80:29] decompress the neck, too. Anytime you're [80:31] doing anything, if you're deadlifting or [80:33] squat, obviously you're lifting a lot of [80:34] heavy weights. If anytime you're lifting [80:36] weight, you got to think of all that all [80:38] that pressure is on your back. All that [80:40] squashing down and you got to do [80:42] something to stretch it out. [80:44] >> Stretch it back out. [80:45] >> But there's ways to heal it now without [80:47] taking away the disc. So, the problem is [80:49] every time they cut away a piece of your [80:51] disc, [80:51] >> you got less disc. You got less disc. [80:53] Yeah. So, the good news is there's some [80:56] treatments that they're doing now where [80:58] they're actually injecting some sort of [80:59] a hydro gel. [81:00] >> I've heard about this. [81:01] >> Yeah. Into the disc itself. So, I asked [81:04] Brigham from Ways to Well about that and [81:06] they're looking into it and they're [81:07] trying to apparently this is not being [81:09] done um widely yet. This is like this [81:12] just experimental, but they they think [81:15] they're going to be able to do that. [81:17] There's also some places like CPI, uh, [81:20] Cellular Performance Institute down at [81:21] Tijana. They've successfully been [81:23] injecting stem cells into people's discs [81:27] and it causes a disc to regenerate [81:29] tissue and get thicker and healthier. [81:32] >> Really? [81:32] >> Yeah. Um, Shane Dorian, my friend, he's [81:35] a prourfer and uh, big wave surfer and [81:38] bow hunter. He he went down there and he [81:40] said it was remarkable. He said within a [81:42] couple of months, like a 30 to 40% [81:44] increase in range of motion, decrease in [81:46] pain. Yeah, you could feel it. It's kind [81:48] of an annoying process cuz once you do [81:50] it, you can't really do [ __ ] for like 6 [81:52] weeks. Like once you I think it's 6 [81:54] weeks. [81:54] >> Well, that's what the same with the [81:56] surgery. You're not doing [ __ ] for six [81:57] weeks after that. [81:58] >> But you can't lift weights. You could [81:59] walk. You can walk. You know, it's all [82:01] it's the whole thing is like let [82:02] everything take. Like let it take. Let [82:04] it heal up. [82:06] >> Don't do anything stupid. Don't reinjure [82:08] it. Don't aggravate it. Like give it a [82:10] chance to actually do its magic. [82:12] >> Yeah, I'll look into that for sure. But [82:16] any neck injury or back injury, they're [82:18] such a [ __ ] Anytime your back [82:20] goes out, you're like, everything you do [82:22] is like, ah, it's so hard to do [82:24] anything. It's like you realize like how [82:26] nice it is to be healthy when [82:28] >> Yeah. [82:29] >> You know, whenever you get hurt. [82:30] >> Yeah. No, back pain. That's That's what [82:32] killed my stepfather. [82:33] >> Back pain. [82:34] >> Yeah. [82:35] >> They just get on pills. [82:36] >> Yeah. [82:36] >> Yeah. And I have a friend in the family [82:39] that did that. [82:39] >> Yeah. He was in I remember one time we [82:41] were fishing up in Wyoming and and he [82:45] just he was like I can't do it. Back [82:46] hurts too bad. [82:48] >> And he went in and had a surgery and [82:49] that made it worse which is [82:52] >> yeah which is a real real risk when you [82:55] start messing around with the spine. [82:57] Right. [82:58] >> Um [82:59] >> and so yeah and then it was you know [83:03] those are serious pain. Now we're [83:05] talking Oxy. [83:05] >> Yeah. Now you're in just agony. Now [83:08] you're on a clock. [83:09] >> Yeah. And you can only do that [ __ ] for [83:10] so long. [83:11] >> Yeah. Now you're on a clock. [83:12] >> Oxies are [ __ ] terrifying. They're so [83:15] terrifying. [83:16] >> Yeah. [83:16] >> So terrifying how readily they were [83:19] handing them out too forever. [83:20] >> Yeah. [83:21] >> Did you ever see Painkiller? That the [83:23] Peter Berg thing that he did for [83:25] Netflix? [83:25] >> No, I didn't. [83:26] >> [ __ ] great, man. So Matthew Brick [83:29] plays such a great creep. Oh, he played [83:32] the Sackler brother. The Sackler. Yeah. [83:34] the head of the family that started this [83:36] whole opiate problem that we have in [83:38] this country. It's [ __ ] terrifying [83:40] cuz it's all real. And those [ __ ] [83:42] people never even went to jail. Who [83:44] knows how many people are dead because [83:45] of them. [83:46] >> Yeah. [83:47] >> Yeah. [83:47] >> They generated [ __ ] billions and [83:49] billions of dollars. Killed a bunch of [83:51] people. [83:53] Ruined countless lives. How many lives? [83:56] People that were connected. Your dad [83:57] gets hooked on that [ __ ] It ruins your [83:59] relationship with your your family. You [84:01] you you wind up being all [ __ ] up [84:02] because you grew up with a dad who was [84:04] strung out on pills. [84:04] >> Yep. No. Generation [84:07] >> Yeah. [84:07] >> generational damage. [84:08] >> Oh god. Yeah. [84:09] >> And these guys put their feet up. [84:11] >> Yeah. They go to a [ __ ] nice country [84:13] club and have the lobster. [84:15] >> Yeah. [84:16] >> [ __ ] suckers. There's so many of them in [84:18] this world. There's like that's [84:20] genuinely evil. [84:21] >> Yes. [84:21] >> There's real demons. That's a real [84:23] demon. Like people want to think demons [84:25] live in hell and you know that's that's [84:27] kind of may may or may not be real. [84:29] Well, no. They're on Earth. There's [84:31] demons. [84:32] >> They're right here. [84:33] >> Yeah. And they justify it. They figure [84:35] out a way to justify it. And they're [84:36] around a bunch of other people who [84:37] justify it, too. And they can just [84:39] immediately dismiss any pain or [84:41] suffering because they got a huge amount [84:44] of profit from it. [84:47] >> Yeah. [84:50] Yep. Those are the [ __ ] [84:51] >> Those are the [ __ ] Yeah. They're out [84:53] there. [84:53] >> And And it doesn't take many of them to [84:55] create like real carnage. I mean, think [84:57] about that. Think about the opiate issue [85:00] in this and it's still going. It was the [85:02] gateway to fentanyl, right? [85:05] >> If you think about it. [85:06] >> Yeah. It was the gateway to fentanyl and [85:08] it was uh it was also it's like they [85:10] were doing those pain man pain [85:12] management centers down in Florida [85:14] >> where they just all they prescribed as [85:16] pills. So you would go and like I'm in [85:18] pain. They were like oh Taylor we've got [85:21] the solution. It's right next door. And [85:23] you go right next door to their pharmacy [85:25] and all their pharmacy has like they [85:26] don't have Ben Gay over there. They [85:28] don't have toothbrushes. [85:29] >> Oxy. [85:29] >> Yeah. They got Oxy. [85:30] >> Here you go, buddy. [85:31] >> This is the solution. [85:32] >> Yeah. [85:34] >> [ __ ] [85:34] >> Yep. [85:36] >> Yep. That's the real drug trade. [85:38] >> Mhm. Yeah. Right. Yeah. I mean, the [85:41] cartel is basically getting the scraps. [85:44] They're making trillions of dollars off [85:46] scraps. [85:46] >> Well, think about this. Did you even [85:48] know what fentanyl was 15 years ago? I [85:50] never heard of it. No, I don't even [85:53] remember when we first heard about it, [85:54] but when we first heard about it on a [85:56] podcast, we were talking about it and we [85:57] found the amount that's lethal and they [85:59] showed it next to a penny and you're [86:01] like, "What?" [86:02] >> Yeah, [86:02] >> that can kill you. And people are taking [86:05] that and they're mixing that in cocaine. [86:08] Holy [ __ ] [86:09] >> And they are bent over zombies on the [86:11] side of the road. [86:12] >> Yeah. Philadelphia is bad, too. There's [86:15] a bunch of cities that are just real bad [86:17] with it. And it doesn't have to be that [86:19] way. And what's interesting is this Iane [86:23] initiative that Rick Perry and Brian [86:25] Huard are pushing in Texas and uh that I [86:28] went to the White House to get Trump to [86:30] be involved in. And they're trying to [86:33] make this so that it's uh you have a [86:35] right to use or right I I think they [86:37] call right to use or right to try for [86:39] people that are addicted and they're [86:40] trying to make it more readily available [86:42] and accessible to veterans. That's the [86:44] thing that could help all these people. [86:46] >> What is it now? [86:46] >> Ibeane. Do you don't know what that is? [86:48] Ibagane is a uh it comes from the aboga [86:52] tree in Africa and it is this very [86:56] potent psychedelic that has no [86:58] recreational use at all. It's not fun. [87:00] Nobody likes it. It's not like you trip, [87:02] you see zombies and [ __ ] hang out [87:04] with the aliens. Uh-uh. you go into this [87:07] very dark experience for like 24 hours [87:10] where it like replays your life to you [87:13] in a very uncomfortable way and also [87:15] somehow or another rewires addiction in [87:18] your brain. And for a large percentage [87:21] of people, just one dose is good enough [87:23] to get them off of everything, whatever [87:25] they're on, whether it's alcohol, [87:26] gambling, coke, whatever the [ __ ] it is. [87:29] But for two doses, when they do it [87:31] twice, it's significantly better. And it [87:34] doesn't just do that. Rick Perry, who [87:36] was the Republican former governor of [87:39] Texas, was staunchly anti-drugs. He's [87:42] said this is his main focus in life now [87:45] is to promote this. This is his goal in [87:46] life because he did it [87:48] >> and he had an incredible reaction to it [87:50] and he knows so many veterans who have [87:52] done it. It's incredible for PTSD. [87:55] somehow or another it has neuro [87:57] regenerative properties where he went [87:59] there and they said he went to his [88:01] doctor before and you know doctor did a [88:03] whole scan of his body and he said look [88:05] you've got a certain amount of age [88:06] related brain atrophy it's like it's [88:08] fine but you know it's normal that [88:10] you're 73 years old or 74 years old. So [88:12] he goes and does the Ibagane uh sees his [88:16] doctor a short time afterwards and the [88:18] doctor says you it's 25% less atrophy [88:22] than when you got the last scan. and [88:24] he's explains to him the whole Ibagane [88:27] thing. He goes back six months later, [88:29] it's all gone. He has no brain atrophy [88:33] anymore, which is bananas. So, it's [88:36] regenerating brain tissue. It's making [88:40] his brain work better, and it's just [88:44] Well, the pharmaceutical companies [88:46] aren't going to let that [ __ ] out. [88:47] >> Well, they they didn't like it. They [88:49] didn't like that I bypassed them and [88:50] went straight to Trump and told them [88:52] about that. But Trump was very open to [88:53] it. He said, 'What are you looking for? [88:54] You looking for FDA approval? Like, [88:56] let's do it. Like, that's literally what [88:57] he said. And then a week later, we were [89:00] at the White House and he was signing [89:01] it. So, it's incredible. But if so many [89:05] veterans have had to go over to mo [89:08] mostly Mexico, but Costa Rica, there's a [89:10] bunch of different places that they go [89:11] where they can have these IBA retreats. [89:14] And these guys have had incredible [89:17] results. Marcus Latrell, he had an [89:19] incredible result from it. He had a real [89:21] problem drinking. you know, obviously [89:23] he's the guy, Lone Survivor, the the [89:26] movies based on his experiences over in [89:27] Afghanistan. [89:29] >> So, this guy, you know, he's he's done [89:32] it. He's gotten over it because of that. [89:34] Like, there's a a long Sean Ryan, long [89:37] list of guys who have had this [89:39] experience and it completely changed [89:41] them. [89:41] >> Wow. [89:42] >> Dakota Meyer did it. So many of these [89:44] guys did it. And because of their their [89:47] stories, cuz all these veterans, then it [89:49] like kind of opened up the idea to a lot [89:51] more right-wing people that would maybe [89:53] be like more hesitant to accept [89:55] something like this. Then on top of it, [89:57] no recreational use. Like no one's like, [89:59] "Boy, I can't wait to do that again." [90:01] Everybody's like, "Holy [ __ ] this [90:02] sucked. I had diarrhea. I threw up. I [90:04] felt I was horrified for [ __ ] 12 [90:07] hours." Apparently just takes you [90:09] through every aspect of your life like [90:11] review like a movie. All the times [90:13] you've ever hurt people, you see it from [90:15] their perspective, like Yeah. It's like [90:17] very It's a very dark experience for a [90:20] lot of people, especially a lot of [90:21] people that have [ __ ] up a lot of [90:22] their life, you know. [90:24] >> Wow. [90:24] >> Yeah. But if those people had access to [90:27] obain, all these homeless people that [90:29] you see strung out, if instead of just [90:32] giving them needles and an iPhone and [90:34] like profiting off of it, if somehow or [90:37] another these [ __ ] can figure out a [90:38] way to profit off of these centers, we [90:41] could bring people in and give them [90:43] ibame retreats. Maybe that would be a [90:45] nice little [ __ ] exit strategy for [90:47] all these grifters that have been [90:49] profiting off of the homeless industrial [90:50] complex for so long. [90:52] >> Yeah. No, you know, they're they're not [90:54] trying to solve problems. [90:55] >> No, no, they're trying to make money. [90:57] That's what I was saying earlier when [90:58] we're talking about charities. That's [90:59] the saddest thing that I come to the [91:02] realization that most nonprofits are [91:05] [ __ ] scams. Like most of them. [91:08] >> Most of them. And this guy was like [91:11] reading off like the average amount that [91:13] these people that are in charge of the [91:15] homeless program in LA are making. It's [91:17] it's extraordinary amount of money. [91:19] >> It's a great living. They're not doing [91:21] it because it's like some sort of a very [91:24] charitable thing that they really want [91:25] to save the world and help people. No, [91:27] they're they're making tons of money at [91:30] >> the at the they're [91:32] for for they're performative [91:34] entrepreneurs if you think about it. [91:36] Come up with a problem, then go pitch [91:39] some version of Karen's solution to a [91:43] government [91:43] >> and take the [ __ ] money [91:46] >> and never solve the problem. because as [91:47] soon as you solve the problem and if you [91:49] do somehow accidentally solve it then go [91:51] find another one. [91:52] >> Yeah. And I think um that's one of the [91:56] reasons why shows like Yellowstone in [91:59] particular that show like people that [92:01] are proud to work hard and really get [92:04] like deep satisfaction out of that life. [92:06] And there's something about that that it [92:09] really like it resonates with people [92:12] like there's a better way than just [92:13] bullshitting people. There's a better [92:15] way than fraud and and nonsense and all [92:19] this political horseshit that's pumped [92:21] down your throat every day. No. How [92:23] about a [ __ ] just a sleeping bag and [92:26] the stars? How about that? Just lying [92:28] there with your horse tied to a tree. [92:30] Isn't that really what everybody wants? [92:32] Isn't doesn't really every want to cook [92:33] their dinner over a fire and laugh with [92:35] all their friends because that's what [92:37] they really want. That's that really [92:39] sounds good. [92:40] >> Simple. [92:40] >> Something real. something that re that's [92:43] like there's it's not that simple [92:45] because it's hard to do all that [ __ ] [92:47] but there's something about it that's [92:48] pure. It's pure. There's no ifands, or [92:51] buts. [92:52] >> You spend a lot of time outside, right? [92:54] And and the entire thing is an endeavor, [92:58] right? If you go on, you go bow hunting, [93:00] you know, you're going to you're going [93:01] to practice, prepare before you go, then [93:04] you're going to hike your ass in uh [93:06] somewhere, you're going to have to set [93:07] up a camp. Uh, and all of these are [93:09] tasks before you've even gone to do the [93:11] thing you went there to do, which is [93:12] going to be another task. But the [93:14] completion of them is the reward. [93:16] >> Yeah. [93:16] >> And the fact that you're doing it [93:17] yourself, everything done yourself. I [93:20] think that's and that's why people are [93:22] so attracted to the life. That's why [93:23] I've got, you know, third generation [93:26] cowboys that went and got a degree in [93:28] ranch management to come back and make, [93:30] you know, $3,000 a month and couldn't be [93:33] happier. [93:34] >> It's wild, isn't it? It's really wild [93:36] when you think about it. It's wild what [93:38] people actually gravitate towards [93:40] because they say that. Have you ever [93:42] seen that Warner Herszog um documentary [93:44] Happy People? [93:45] >> No. [93:46] >> It's called Happy People, Life in the [93:48] Tiger, and it's all about these trappers [93:51] that live on the Tiger River in uh [93:53] Siberia. And uh all these people do is [93:57] trap and hunt and fish. They don't have [94:00] any other way to make a living. That's [94:01] all they do. And they're so [ __ ] [94:03] happy. And they're all laughing together [94:06] and drinking together and hanging out [94:07] with their dogs and their dogs are sled [94:09] dogs. And so they're on they're on [94:11] snowmobiles and the dogs are chasing [94:12] behind them and the dogs hunt with them. [94:14] And these [ __ ] people have like zero [94:16] mental illness. And when they're talking [94:19] to them, they're talking in Russian. So [94:21] it's all translated. But what they're [94:22] talking about like the way they talk, [94:24] it's like that this is how you're [94:26] supposed to live. This is real life. [94:29] And they're all happy. [94:31] >> There's a guy [94:34] I'm gonna get his name wrong. It's like [94:36] Primager, something like that. Uh, and [94:39] he [94:41] in the 60s. [94:42] >> Dick Premikin. [94:43] >> Preachkin. That's it. [94:44] >> Yeah. Yeah. The guy who lived in Alaska. [94:46] >> Yeah. Just went up said bucket. [94:49] >> Yeah. [94:50] >> Went up into the way into the wild and [94:54] built by hand a cabin and lived there [94:57] and and documented it. Brought a little [94:59] Super Eight camera, whatever, filmed the [95:00] whole thing. Yeah. and and filmed [95:02] himself. I mean, he he lived for 35 [95:05] years. He was 80 something years old [95:06] when he finally was too old to to get [95:09] through another winter when he came [95:10] down. And he just built this cabin and [95:13] just lived, hunt, fished, grew [95:16] >> potatoes, had to build. [95:19] Prreni, that's how you say his name. [95:22] >> Uh, P R O E. [95:24] >> If you haven't, if you haven't watched [95:25] that documentary, it is fascinating. [95:27] >> It's amazing. Yeah. Look at the [95:29] different What is it? Oh, they Oh, just [95:32] >> talking about it. [95:33] >> Oh, but why they show 2023? [95:38] >> Um, this guy when he documented all of [95:42] it, you know, it's so attractive. [95:44] There's something about the way he's [95:45] live and he's by himself, which is also [95:47] wild. Like, how do you not get lonely? [95:50] >> No, there's that. [95:51] >> I mean, I'd lose my [ __ ] marbles. I [95:53] need people. I need to talk to somebody. [95:55] I don't think I'd be liking that. But [95:58] it's so attractive. But the but the [96:00] notion of that kind of self-reliance. [96:02] >> Yeah. No, there's something about it [96:03] that's like deeply ingrained in our DNA. [96:07] It's not just that. It's like uh it's a [96:10] a healthy interaction with the the wild [96:14] world. [96:16] >> There he is. Look at that guy. Made all [96:19] that [ __ ] himself. [96:21] >> That's what's crazy. [96:22] >> Yeah. [96:22] >> The whole the whole I mean he made his [96:24] own tools. He made it was it's really w [96:27] I think he was a Wasn't he a lumber man [96:29] or something like that? [96:31] >> I can't remember if he was [96:32] >> Look at [ __ ] pretty that is. My god. [96:35] This is right in front of his house. You [96:38] just build a house out there. [96:40] Alaska is amazing, man. I mean, the [96:43] winters can suck a dick, but the just [96:46] the actual being there in the place and [96:49] the people are they're clearly like [96:52] extraordinary people. Like when you go [96:55] just even hanging out in a bar in [96:56] Anchorage, like you guys are different. [96:58] They're like more reliable, [97:01] >> you know, sturdier people. [97:03] >> No matter where you live in Alaska, [97:05] you're going to have to be tough. [97:06] >> Yeah, you have to be. And they were [97:08] laughing about some guy who got stomped [97:10] to death by a moose cuz he was throwing [97:11] snowballs at it in town. Like, okay, [97:14] like that's something you guys have to [97:16] think about. You you might get stomped [97:17] to death in front of the ATM machine. [97:19] >> Or maybe maybe don't throw a [ __ ] [97:20] snowball at a thousand pound animal. [97:24] Yeah. Well, you can catch a a cow with [97:26] their calves and she'll stump you no [97:27] matter what. [97:29] >> So, it's a book. Um, Prrenicki says he [97:33] turned his back on a tedious on tedious [97:36] 50-hour work weeks and moved to Alaska [97:38] to do a thing to completion. He built [97:40] the cabin when he was 51 and lived there [97:43] for more than 30 years. Wow. [97:46] Wow. Where is that area? The Twin Lakes [97:49] in Lake Clark National Park. [97:51] >> I don't know. [97:54] There's another guy that lives up there [97:56] that lives uh near the Arctic Circle. Um [97:59] Vice Guide to Travel did a piece on him [98:02] years ago. It's same kind of deal. He [98:04] lives in a cabin and uh he's been up in [98:07] that cabin since the 1970s. He didn't he [98:10] never saw 911. He saw a photograph of it [98:12] years later. He's just been up there in [98:15] the woods. All he does is he hunts [98:17] caribou and he has them all like hanging [98:19] up like frozen because it's frozen [98:22] outside. Like that's is outside as his [98:24] cooler [98:25] >> and while they're there a grizzly tries [98:26] to steal his stash and he has to shoot [98:28] the grizzly. It's like it's crazy [98:31] >> really. What's that called? [98:32] >> It's called uh Vice Guide to Travel and [98:35] it's Himmo's Arctic Adventure is the [98:38] video series. And what's interesting, [98:41] this is like the early days of Vice when [98:42] Vice was really cool. And they get this [98:45] [ __ ] nerd with glasses. He's probably [98:47] from like Williamsburg who flies out to [98:50] Alaska to hang out with this guy. And uh [98:52] the guy this like these journalists were [98:54] like hardcore. These young kids were [98:57] they knew they were doing something kind [98:58] of crazy. And they would go to war [99:00] zones. Like that's how Tim Pool started [99:02] out. These guys would go to the [ __ ] [99:04] war zones and get shot at. They had [99:06] bulletproof vests on and [ __ ] they'd be [99:08] doing investigate like real [99:09] investigative reporting. And so this guy [99:12] did just really went up there and hung [99:15] out with this dude in Alaska for like a [99:17] week and was talking to him was like [99:19] what's what's so great about this? And [99:21] he's a very intelligent guy. He's not a [99:24] the guy who's this this guy. See if you [99:27] can find that. Did you find it? [99:28] >> I was looking around. There's I mean [99:30] >> they're still posting stuff. They've [99:32] there's the last Alaskan Excuse me. The [99:34] last Alaskans. [99:35] >> Oh, he's still posting stuff. They have [99:37] a YouTube channel. [99:38] >> Oh, wow. [99:39] >> Himo and Edna. [99:40] >> Oh. Oh, wow. He looks older now. [99:43] >> They're just talking about podcast here [99:44] a second ago. [99:45] >> Oh, interesting. They're talking about [99:48] podcasts. [99:48] >> Our podcast. [99:49] >> Oh, because we talked about him. [99:50] >> No, I mean just I just saw as you were [99:53] your picture popped up. [99:54] >> Oh, that's it. That's me talking about [99:55] him. Yeah. Uh see if you could find the [99:58] Vice Guide to Travel because that's [99:59] where I found out about him. So, this [100:02] guy's he's like one of the last people [100:04] that's allowed to live up there. He has [100:07] like a notice posted on his um his cabin [100:11] because he's grandfathered in. I don't [100:13] think you could build a cabin up there [100:14] anymore. [100:18] That's not This is afterwards [100:20] >> 15 years ago. [100:22] >> Might be it. But I think it's called [100:25] Himmo's Arctic Adventure. [100:29] Yeah. Himo Himo Cor himo's Arctic [100:32] Refuge. That's the article. [100:35] >> Yeah. I mean, device website isn't [100:37] really one of the most well-kept things [100:39] on the internet these days. [100:41] >> Um, [100:47] put in Arctic Adventure. [100:49] >> I'm guessing that the article was the [100:50] first thing and then they went and [100:51] followed up to make a video and that's [100:52] what this is. [100:54] >> Yeah, I don't know if Yeah, maybe that's [100:56] it. [100:56] >> Yeah. See, it says it presents Himo's [100:58] Arctic Refuge, [100:59] >> right? That's probably it. [101:00] >> They could have just changed the name on [101:01] YouTube also. [101:02] >> I think they did. Or maybe I remember it [101:04] wrong. Either way, this guy's premise is [101:08] that this is really how you should live. [101:11] This is how people Yeah, that's the guy. [101:13] So, you see this looking nerdy cat is [101:16] hanging out. [101:18] He looks so out of place. Yep. This is [101:20] it. [101:22] and he's got this uh caribou that he [101:24] shot and they're hanging frozen and he [101:27] just saws off a piece and throws the [101:29] frozen steaks onto the grill, cooks it [101:32] over wood and this is how this guy lives [101:34] and that's all he eats. He's just eating [101:37] caribou and salmon and he lives up there [101:42] all year round, man. And it's uh I mean [101:46] he's just very happy. And that this is [101:49] the weird part about it is how happy [101:51] people who live like this are [101:54] >> because I think that's in our brain. [101:56] That's how we're designed to exist with [101:58] nature. [102:00] >> We're designed to be hunter gatherers. [102:02] >> You know, that's we still have the same [102:04] DNA as people that lived tens of [102:05] thousands of years ago. [102:07] >> And you know, cities started [102:10] what maybe 10,000 years ago in some [102:12] form, right? [102:13] >> Yeah. depending on who you ask, [102:15] >> you know, I think we're a little wrong [102:17] with that, too. I think they're starting [102:19] to change their perspective of when [102:23] actual civilization emerged because of [102:26] stuff like um Gobecley and Turkey. They [102:29] found these immense structures that are [102:30] 11,800 years old that were buried that [102:33] this guy who was like a I think it was a [102:35] sheep herder in the 90s found it. [102:37] >> Yeah. found like a stone that was like [102:39] sticking out of the ground weird and he [102:40] kicked it with his boots like knocking [102:42] some dirt off and then he brought in [102:43] some archaeologists and then they [102:45] discovered this massive complex these [102:48] like huge circles of giant stone columns [102:51] with 3D animals carved in them and they [102:54] carbonated the ground and it was [102:55] intentionally covered up somewhere [102:57] around 11,000 plus years ago. So they're [102:59] like really Yeah. So like what the [ __ ] [103:01] is this? Like they didn't even know like [103:03] what the civilization was like what why [103:06] did they build this? What's the purpose [103:07] of it? There's a lot a lot of people [103:10] that debate whether or not what's [103:12] depicted on it is a calendar. Is it a [103:14] marking of an event? Does it show the [103:16] flood? Like what what is this? It's it's [103:19] weird stuff, man. Like really weird [103:21] stuff. And I think there's more of that [103:23] than you'd like to that makes people [103:25] comfortable. And archaeologists are very [103:26] hesitant to accept it. Well, that whole [103:29] that whole deal, right? Like your [103:31] relevance being upon you've discovered [103:33] this thing and [103:34] >> um you know when they when they found [103:36] the the Clovis point [103:39] so then we're dating everything off of [103:40] that and anyone finding anything else is [103:43] going to render that guy's discovery [103:45] less important. [103:46] >> Yeah. And you know there was at one [103:48] point we thought there was this logical [103:49] evolution of man from homo erectus into [103:52] homo sapiion and now we know that there [103:54] were at least four maybe five species of [103:57] humanoid living at the same time. [104:00] >> Mhm. [104:01] >> [ __ ] at least five. [104:03] >> Not only that it's like really difficult [104:05] to make a fossil. Most people are going [104:07] to die and their bones are going to be [104:09] gone within a hundred years. [104:10] >> Yeah. It's just what what we've been [104:12] able to find and we're basing an entire [104:14] science upon [104:17] incredibly incomplete discoveries. [104:18] >> We're b we're basing entire science on a [104:20] very limited number that can even [104:23] possibly exist. Like I think if you take [104:27] into account how many dinosaur bones [104:29] they found and then how many dinosaurs [104:32] existed and for how many hundreds of [104:35] millions of years dinosaurs existed and [104:38] you realize like oh like most [ __ ] [104:41] doesn't make a fossil. So, we don't even [104:42] know how many different dinosaurs that [104:44] we've I mean, they just discovered a new [104:46] one recently. There's We don't even know [104:47] how many existed that we never found [104:49] fossilized. [104:50] >> Yeah. If you if they didn't run through [104:52] some lava pit or tar pit or something, [104:54] how would you know? [104:54] >> And every so often some new form of [104:58] ancient human pops up and we're like, [105:00] "Oh, what's this one? What the [ __ ] is [105:02] this one? There's weird ones. They're [105:05] all over the place. There's a a [ __ ] [105:06] ton of them. The Dennis Ovenanss. [105:08] There's the the one in uh I believe it [105:11] was in China. The big-headed people that [105:13] they're quite a bit larger. [105:14] >> These are in Texas. [105:15] >> Yeah, that's Glen [105:16] >> Dinosaur Valley State Park. Wow. [105:19] >> That's Glen Rose, Texas. [105:20] >> That's crazy. [105:22] How crazy is that? Look at those [105:24] footprints. That's so nuts. [105:27] That is so nuts that a dinosaur left [105:30] those. How long ago? 113 milliony old [105:33] dinosaur tracks. What the [ __ ] man? [105:41] And you know, we're just lucky. [105:42] >> So, what is he what you that thing and [105:45] how much did it [ __ ] weigh to imprint [105:47] into that which is now granite, right? [105:49] But at the time, it's probably some [105:50] mixture of mud and ash from a volcano [105:53] that came together, [105:55] >> right? Probably [105:56] >> some version of that, [105:57] >> right? I wonder what the animal was. Do [105:59] they know which uh dinosaur it was? [106:01] >> Picture of one here. I don't know if [106:02] it's the I just guess that's the one [106:04] they assumed was there. God, those [106:06] footprints are so dope. [106:09] >> That's so wild. [106:12] >> Wonder who the first guy found that was. [106:14] >> Says it was discovered after a drought, [106:16] so it would have been [106:17] >> Oh, that's even cooler. [106:20] >> So, it was underneath the water the [106:22] whole time and then they're like, [106:23] "Holy." The river dried up completely in [106:24] most locations, line for more tracks to [106:26] be uncovered here in the park. Wow, [106:29] that's sick. [106:32] That's the animal [106:33] >> believed to be. I don't know. Yeah, they [106:34] wouldn't know for sure. [106:35] >> Belonged to two types of dinos including [106:38] Acroan [106:41] canthosaurus. [106:42] >> Yeah, I think I don't think they found [106:44] any fossils or anything to be [106:47] for the record. [106:48] >> That's even crazier, right? All you find [106:50] is the feet. [106:52] >> Think about how many died there. Think [106:53] about how many just got eaten by other [106:55] animals and [ __ ] out. And I mean, most [106:59] stuff that lives, I mean, you know as [107:01] well as anybody. You very rarely find [107:04] skeletons in the woods. [107:07] >> No, the mice are going to eat them. [107:08] >> Yeah. Something's going to eat most of [107:10] what you find in the woods. Within a [107:12] couple of years, everything's gone. But [107:14] like, [107:15] >> when was the last time like if you're a [107:17] hunter? Good luck finding a dead [107:18] mountain lion. [107:20] >> They must die. They must die. I don't [107:22] know anybody that's found a dead one. [107:23] >> I've never found one. I never seen one. [107:25] >> There's thousands of them. They die. [107:27] Where are they? [107:28] >> [ __ ] nature takes care of everything. [107:30] And that's what would happen to most [107:31] fossils. Yeah, [107:32] >> that's why most fossils don't happen. I [107:35] mean, when people die, they don't get [107:36] fossilized. [107:37] >> Says 1908, a local school boy found some [107:40] of these. [107:40] >> Wow, look at the size of those next to [107:42] that dude. That's crazy. [107:44] >> Imagine you ran home and tried to tell [107:45] your parents found some dinosaur. They [107:47] wouldn't even know what dinosaurs really [107:48] were, I bet, back then. How would they [107:49] have known? [107:50] >> Well, there's a lot of people today that [107:51] don't even think dinosaurs are real, [107:53] which is hilarious. [107:55] >> There's so many so many knuckleheads [107:57] online. But I mean, we don't we we have [108:00] a very [108:02] limited amount of information that we're [108:03] basing our the entire history of Earth [108:05] on planet. [108:06] >> What do you describe that as a 1910 [108:10] >> three-toed giant [108:14] >> lizard? I don't even know what [108:15] >> I How would you even be sure that that [108:17] was a footprint? [108:17] >> Come look at this. Then you got to go [108:19] tell everybody else in the town to come [108:20] follow you out there to find it. [108:22] >> Right. In 1910, did they even have [108:23] drawings of dinosaurs? Well, I would I [108:26] would think they would have found some [108:27] of the bones. [108:28] >> I'm sure. I think we figured that out, [108:31] right? I think we talked about that. [108:32] Didn't they first start finding them in [108:34] the 1800s? Isn't that what it was? [108:37] >> But yeah, it's not I mean, if you think [108:39] about how many different things died and [108:41] just were absorbed by the earth, just [108:43] eaten [ __ ] out, swallowed up, just [108:46] destroyed by time and erosion, and never [108:49] became fossils. We're we're basing the [108:52] entire history of the planet on a [108:53] limited amount of information. And that [108:56] information, it never gets younger. It [108:58] always gets older. The more stuff they [109:01] found, [109:01] >> like they found a modern version of [109:04] human beings that pushes the timeline of [109:07] humans back another three or 400,000 [109:10] years. And that keeps happening. Well, [109:12] they they they thought that people [109:14] crossed the Bearing Land Bridge 12,000, [109:18] >> 14,000 years ago, and now they've pushed [109:19] that back 10,000 years. [109:21] >> Yeah. They found the those footprints in [109:22] White Sands, New Mexico, and those are [109:24] 22,000 years old. [109:26] >> It took a giant flood to come wash away [109:29] layers of sediment [109:30] >> that revealed that. That's why it's so [109:33] muddy around it, I guess. [109:35] >> Wow. [109:35] >> And then they started digging. [109:37] >> That's [ __ ] cool. [109:40] >> That is so cool. [109:42] And this is in 1952 they did that. [109:44] >> No, no, no. 1908. [109:46] >> 908. [109:46] >> The pictures are from 1952 or something. [109:49] Okay. So, it must have just kept Maybe [109:50] it flooded again 50 years later. [109:52] >> Floods do happen here fast. [109:54] >> When did they first figure out [109:56] dinosaurs? Like what was the first year [109:58] a dinosaur bone was discovered [110:03] on your ranch? Do you find like a lot of [110:05] like arrowheads and like Native American [110:08] stuff? the one I grew up on. Everywhere. [110:11] >> Yeah. [110:12] >> Every time it had rain, [110:14] >> you'd find these points. [110:15] >> Dutch enthrals me. It's so fascinating. [110:19] You pick up some arrow. I found one in [110:21] Nevada while I was on a mu deer hunt. I [110:23] was in the high desert. We found this [110:25] little tiny thing. I look down. I go, [110:27] "Oh my god, it's a [ __ ] arrowette." [110:29] And you just think some dude who knows [110:32] how many hundreds of years ago shot at a [110:34] deer. Maybe [110:35] >> thousands. Yeah. We found a bunch and [110:37] and my mother took them to Fort Worth to [110:40] the museum and they dated them and some [110:41] of them and they they could look at them [110:43] and they'd know various styles, right? [110:45] And they go, "Oh, this was made by this [110:48] is 2200 years old. This 4,000 years old. [110:51] This is when they started doing this." [110:52] >> We have one here. I got one here [110:54] somewhere. It's a big one, too. [110:58] >> 1677 was when the first scientifically [111:01] recorded dinosaur bone was described. [111:03] Although it says they've been digging [111:05] people have been digging them up for [111:06] thousands of years, but [111:07] >> they didn't know what the [ __ ] it was. [111:08] >> This one says he even thought it [111:10] belonged to a giant human. [111:13] >> And then [111:13] >> this is one from here. [111:14] >> Oh yeah. [111:15] >> Yeah. [111:15] >> Look at that. [111:16] >> Yeah. A friend of mine got that off of [111:18] his ranch. [111:20] Remy Warren told me that's probably one [111:21] they use for fishing cuz it was so big. [111:24] >> Interesting. [111:25] >> Yeah, I thought so, too. I was like, [111:27] that's interesting. Because I guess when [111:29] you're dealing with old bows that didn't [111:31] have a whole lot of power, they you [111:33] really wouldn't want a big wide cut [111:34] because you wouldn't get enough [111:36] penetration to get through the rib cage [111:38] unless you're really close. [111:39] >> This would be more on a spear. [111:40] >> No, it would be on a arrow. It would [111:43] just be something that you shot at a [111:45] fish because it's easier to penetrate [111:46] than like say a buffalo, [111:48] >> right? [111:48] >> Where they would use a smaller head. [111:50] >> They're just trying to get penetration. [111:53] >> That's fascinating. It's just an amazing [111:56] thing. You're finding just this piece of [111:58] ancient history where people had no [112:01] internet, no books, no nothing. Just [112:04] flintnapping and using tendons. [112:08] Yeah. [112:10] >> And then trying to practice with those [112:12] bows and figure out how to do it while [112:15] you're on horseback, too. [112:19] >> It's crazy. [112:20] >> Wild. [112:21] So, where you grew up, the on the ranch [112:23] you grew up, you'd find them all the [112:24] time? [112:24] >> All the time. [112:25] >> What was the oldest [ __ ] you found? [112:28] >> Man, I I I can't remember, but but I [112:31] remember it being thousands of years [112:32] old. A few thousand years old, but we [112:35] had we had a like my mother had this [112:38] wicker basket that was like this big and [112:42] and it was full [112:44] of arrowheads. [112:45] >> Yeah. Wow. [112:46] >> You'd find them just toss them in there. [112:48] >> That's crazy. Yeah. [112:50] >> Just makes you think like how long did [112:52] people live on that land? How many [112:55] hundreds thousands of years do people [112:57] live on that land? [112:59] >> Yeah. Yeah. And and or pass through or [113:04] have battles or who [ __ ] knows? [113:06] >> Yeah. [113:07] >> Or or or when you find them like we [113:09] found them. I mean, every single time it [113:12] rained you, there was this stock tank [113:14] behind our house and you maybe it's half [113:17] mile up to the stock tank. We walk that [113:19] road and you you could find four or [113:20] five. So, was that a trading depot? Was [113:23] that some place where people went to [113:25] trade [113:27] and then I always think like how do you [113:29] lose that many? [113:32] >> As hard as they must be to make. [113:34] >> You'd think once you've shot that arrow, [113:35] you're going to go look for the arrow. [113:37] >> Yeah. [113:37] >> Because you spent hours making this [113:39] >> this [113:40] >> They must have shot so many for so long. [113:44] They I mean, they're probably shooting [113:46] them every day. They probably had [113:47] somebody back at camp making them every [113:49] day. [113:49] >> There's probably some guy that that's [113:50] his skill. [113:51] >> Yeah. [113:51] >> Maybe that maybe when people got older, [113:53] they couldn't couldn't hunt, couldn't [113:55] run, [113:56] >> right? You know, [113:57] >> maybe [113:57] >> they sat back and [113:58] >> Right. [113:59] >> Yeah. And that guy makes the arrows and [114:01] maybe somebody else makes the bows and [114:03] this guy's going out and shooting the [114:04] deer and bringing them back. When you're [114:06] doing a show like 1823, [114:09] how much research did you have to do to [114:12] try to get that right? Because that was, [114:14] in my opinion, one of the best [114:17] theatrical things that that I ever [114:20] watched, movie or television show, that [114:22] I feel like nailed what it must have [114:25] been like to try to travel across the [114:28] country to be a civilized person living [114:29] in the city and try to make your way [114:31] across the country and just experience [114:33] the wild [ __ ] those people saw. [114:35] >> Well, there's a few things. So, a lot of [114:38] research, but interestingly, I had [114:42] uh my family had come, one side of my [114:44] family had come from Kentucky to Texas [114:47] in the 1840s and whatever great [114:51] great-grandmother journaled. [114:53] >> Wow. [114:53] >> So, I had the journal. Um, [114:55] >> holy [ __ ] [114:57] >> And uh and then I started finding other [114:59] journals. there wasn't, you know, some [115:01] were published and and reading about [115:06] just how [ __ ] dangerous it was if you [115:10] think about it. Um, rivers were the most [115:13] terrifying thing crossing rivers cuz no [115:15] one swam. No one could swim. [115:19] And most of the most of the people who [115:23] came into either the port of New Orleans [115:25] or Galveastston, they were European. [115:29] They were German, a lot of Germans. [115:31] There were a lot of um central Europeans [115:34] that came uh and and they were promised [115:38] free land, right? there would be travel [115:42] agencies that they would arrange the [115:44] entire trip with before they've even [115:46] left Germany or Croatia or wherever they [115:49] were. And uh and so by the time that [115:52] they landed in Galveastston, they would [115:54] meet up with their group and the group [115:56] would, you know, they'd have chipped in [115:58] all this amount of money and they've got [116:00] guides and they would have already [116:02] arranged for mules or horses and and [116:04] wagons and uh and off they go. And [116:07] >> and they had no idea. [116:08] >> No. And they a lot of them had never [116:10] [ __ ] ridden a horse in their life, [116:13] much less fired a gun, much less you [116:16] they're in a completely foreign [116:19] area. Like they don't and they landed in [116:21] Texas, most of them heading to Oregon, [116:23] uh [116:25] because that area was the most similar [116:27] to where they were from in central [116:28] Europe. And then, you know, for whatever [116:31] reason, they didn't some didn't get that [116:32] far. Some maybe never got past Waco or [116:34] Fort Worth or wherever. Um and then off [116:38] they went and and the dangers were from [116:42] obviously rivers and sun exposure, [116:45] disease. Um [116:49] obviously there were issues with bandits [116:51] and the Native American tribes depending [116:53] on the time of year that that the era, [116:56] right? By the 80s that was largely not [116:58] an issue, the 1880s. Um, but bandits [117:01] sure [ __ ] were a real issue because [117:04] there's no rule of law. [117:06] >> Right. [117:07] >> Right. And we can look at there's plenty [117:08] of bad people doing awful [ __ ] today and [117:12] we got all sorts of laws. Now imagine if [117:14] those people had the wherewithal to go [117:16] to a place to where there's no laws, [117:18] >> no law and no enforcement, no help, no [117:21] nothing. You're on your own. [117:23] >> You on your [ __ ] own. And there was a [117:25] bunch of people that had been living [117:26] like that for decades. Just [ __ ] [117:28] people up, [117:29] >> waiting for you. [117:30] >> Just waiting for you. Waiting for you. [117:32] Here they come. Let's get them. [117:34] >> And that was what their thing was. [117:35] >> Yeah. No. The So river crossings were [117:37] incredibly dangerous. Um and then [117:41] trying to if you didn't have an [117:43] experienced guide, you're [ __ ] Truly [117:46] [ __ ] Because you could pick the wrong [117:48] way and run out of water. Go wander [117:52] around in the circle. So you get up [117:53] there on the great plains to where it's [117:55] flat and there's and you don't know how [117:56] to read the sun, you don't know where [117:59] you're going. People go out there and [118:01] make giant circles. [118:02] >> Yeah. I was reading something about that [118:04] the other day that people tend to for [118:07] whatever reason always walk in a [118:10] counterclockwise [118:11] um direction when they get lost. And [118:14] that even if they're left or [118:17] right-handed or left-handed, it doesn't [118:19] seem to matter. Humans when they walk, [118:22] if they get lost like in the woods, they [118:24] walk in circles and they almost always [118:26] walk in a counterclockwise direction. [118:29] And so this article was uh explaining [118:32] that if you find yourself lost and you [118:34] think you're running into the same [118:37] places, most likely you should veer [118:40] towards the right because you're you're [118:43] most likely looping towards the left. [118:45] For whatever reason, people tend to do [118:47] that. Wonder if there's like a [118:49] scientific explanation. [118:51] See if there's put that in perplexity. [118:52] See why people move in a [118:54] counterclockwise. [118:55] >> It didn't come up with anything. [118:56] >> Perplexity doesn't know [ __ ] Doesn't [118:58] have any woodsmanship. [119:00] >> I never understood getting lost in the [119:02] wilderness. I didn't understand it. [119:03] >> Really? [119:03] >> I can understand not knowing where you [119:05] are. [119:06] >> But you know, but I never understood [119:08] getting lost. [119:09] >> Do you Well, you must have learned how [119:11] to use a compass early. [119:13] >> Yeah. Or or the sun. [119:14] >> Yeah. [119:14] >> Right. If the sun comes up in the [119:16] morning and you're facing it, right, [119:17] then behind you is west, to your left is [119:19] north, to your right is south. [119:21] >> Some people have zero experience in the [119:24] woods, though. [119:25] >> People tend to loop often [119:26] counterclockwise when lost because small [119:28] errors in our internal sense of straight [119:30] ahead accumulate. And humans also have a [119:33] subtle left turn counterclockwise bias [119:36] whose exact cause is still unclear. [119:38] Isn't that weird? Wow, that's so weird. [119:40] In lab and field experiments, [119:42] blindfolded people tend to walk straight [119:44] without landmarks. Almost always end up [119:47] curving into large loops instead of [119:49] moving in a straight line. People told [119:52] rather to walk straight without [119:53] landmarks. [119:54] >> Wow. This happens because without [119:56] internal clues or external clues like [119:58] the sun, distant objects or visible [120:00] path, small random errors in balance and [120:03] body feedback build up until the path [120:06] bends enough to close into a circle. [120:09] Wow. [120:10] That's got to be so disheartening. [120:12] You've been walking for days and then [120:14] you pass the same dead tree and you're [120:16] like, "Oh my god, we walked in a [ __ ] [120:19] circle." Pedestrians everywhere exhibit [120:22] a counterclockwise bias, wired to walk [120:25] counterclockwise. During COVID, [120:27] scientists studying social distancing [120:29] noticing people seem to prefer moving [120:31] counterclockwise. That's so weird. Hm. [120:35] Tendency is fundamentally individual [120:37] rather than a collective. [120:39] What does that mean? [120:41] Um, so every individual does it, I [120:44] guess, rather than a group of people [120:45] just following the leader. [120:47] >> Pretty wild. [120:49] So when people get lost, some but some [120:52] some people have just zero experience [120:54] being in the woods at all and they just [120:57] don't know where to go. They where are [120:58] we? And they just they just [ __ ] [121:01] freak out and then they panic because [121:03] they think what's out there? Oh my god, [121:04] I'm gonna die. [121:05] >> Yeah. [121:06] And you realize that once you're out [121:08] there that nature doesn't give a [ __ ] if [121:11] you make it. [121:12] >> No. [121:13] >> Doesn't care [121:14] >> at all. [121:15] >> No. [121:15] >> As it's heartless, completely oblivious [121:18] to your desire to stay alive. It's not [121:22] interested in what you want to do at [121:24] all. [121:24] >> Nope. Nope. Not at all. It's ambivalent. [121:28] And [121:28] >> but that's also part of the beauty of [121:29] it, right? [121:30] >> Yeah. [121:30] >> When you're out there, [121:32] >> especially if you take yourself [121:33] seriously. [121:34] >> Yeah. you're out there, you're like, [121:35] "Oh, I ain't shit." [121:38] It'll it'll test you. [121:40] >> Yeah. When you're writing a a thing like [121:43] 1823, like you're doing all this [121:46] research and you read the the diaries [121:48] from your you said your [121:49] great-grandmother. Is that right? [121:51] >> Like great great grandmother. [121:53] >> Did you uh did you ever think like [121:55] putting some of those letters online so [121:57] other people can read them? [121:59] >> No. [122:01] There's plenty of there's there's any [122:03] number of published books of very [122:04] similar journals. [122:05] >> I know. But it' be kind of dope for [122:06] people to read about your great great [122:09] grandmother. [122:10] >> Yeah. And nothing happened, right? Like [122:12] it sucked. It was cold. We had freaking [122:16] whatever weird [ __ ] they had for dinner [122:18] that night and you know so and so was [122:20] rude and you know it was this and we you [122:23] know we stopped in this beautiful valley [122:24] and it was hard to get across the river [122:26] and I was scared and you know but no [122:28] attacks no it was pretty uneventful. [122:30] >> They got lucky. [122:31] >> It's just it's interesting just as a [122:33] window into time. [122:34] >> Yes. you know. [122:35] >> Well, what's interesting really is how [122:37] well written the journal was. [122:40] >> Right. Cuz everyone [122:41] >> was very educated. [122:43] >> Was better educated. [122:44] >> Yes. [122:45] >> Yeah. Yeah. And [122:48] Yeah. That's that's weird, right? When [122:50] you read like Civil War letters and [122:52] you're like, why are these guys so [122:53] [ __ ] smart? [122:54] >> I have letters from my grandfather who [122:57] died in World War II. Love letters from [122:59] him to his to my grandmother. um years [123:04] of them cuz you know he they listed in [123:06] 1941 and and then went off and became a [123:10] he they flew a I guess it was the B19 [123:14] flew a bomber um and uh yeah and wrote [123:19] all these letters to her um yeah and I [123:22] have all those and they're just [123:23] magnificent [123:24] just the way that people would [123:28] just be so eloquent in a letter to you [123:32] know your wife. [123:33] >> Yeah. My beloved, they would write [123:35] things like that. [123:35] >> Yeah. [123:36] >> It is weird like the deterioration of [123:39] our ability to express ourselves, the [123:42] common person's ability to express [123:44] themselves. [123:45] Like you wouldn't have expected that [123:47] back then. I bet if you could tell [123:48] people about the future, you go, "Oh, [123:50] you're going to have the answer to any [123:51] question on your phone. You have a small [123:53] device in your pocket. It's also acts as [123:55] a flashlight. You're going to be able to [123:57] pick that thing up and ask it anything [123:59] you want and in instantaneously it's [124:01] going to give you a result. Like, oh, [124:02] people must be brilliant. No, no, [124:05] they're half [ __ ] because they [124:07] didn't learn anything, [124:08] >> right? [124:09] >> Right. You can ask a machine, the [124:11] machine's done all the learning. You [124:13] just get an answer that you didn't earn. [124:15] >> Right. [124:16] >> That's the word. [124:17] >> Earn. [124:18] >> Yeah. [124:18] >> Yeah. Just like equity. The problem with [124:21] equity is you didn't earn it. Yeah, [124:24] >> the problem with uh having the same [124:27] results as everybody else when you don't [124:28] put the same effort. People in the 1800s [124:31] often spent blocks of time, typically [124:33] one to three hours at a stretch on [124:35] letterw writing and heavy correspondence [124:38] could easily spend several hours most [124:40] days. Wow. Most people treated [124:43] correspondence as a regular daily or [124:45] weekly task similar to a modern email [124:48] block excepting that it would be take a [124:50] significant chunk of their time. Wow. [124:54] I mean, how important was the [ __ ] [124:56] mailman back then? [124:59] >> Everything. [125:00] >> The guy was everything. [125:01] >> Everything. [125:01] >> Some dude on a horse with a [ __ ] bag [125:03] of letters. [125:07] >> Nuts. [125:07] >> For a quarter. I mean, how much did they [125:09] charge? A quarter was a lot of money [125:11] back then. Probably was less than that. [125:12] >> Yeah, probably half a penny or something [125:14] if they had a Well, they did have a half [125:16] penny. Do how much do you enjoy writing [125:19] that kind of a show versus writing a [125:22] show like Lioness or like Land Man? Like [125:24] what what is your Do you have a favorite [125:26] or do you like all of them? [125:27] >> No, I I I can't say I I have a I have a [125:31] favorite necessarily. You know, the fun [125:32] thing about Lionus, which is sort of [125:37] I can't say it's ripped from the [125:39] headlines because I don't I I've tried [125:42] to be um [125:44] I've tried to guess what's going to [125:46] happen politically and then fictionalize [125:48] that. Um and the fact that I've managed [125:50] to be right [125:52] [ __ ] wild. I thought surely in season [125:55] two when I [125:58] when I when I said that the cartels had [126:00] been listed as terrorist organizations, [126:02] I'm like this this could be my 18-month [126:06] cancel vacation coming. Um and then it [126:09] [ __ ] happened and then it came out [126:11] and you know the show came out within [126:13] weeks of that and and I looked I looked [126:15] really [126:16] >> like a soothsayer. [126:17] >> Yeah. Um, so that it it's a lot of fun [126:20] because it's so political and and it's [126:22] not it doesn't choose a political side. [126:24] It just looks at the the trade craft of [126:27] espionage and and how it's it's [126:30] intermingles with our military and and [126:32] and it's just fascinating [ __ ] to me. [126:35] Just fascinating. [126:36] >> But there's so many different things [126:37] that you have to be aware of to write [126:39] the [ __ ] that you write, you know? Like [126:42] um is the Harrison Ford one 1923? Is [126:44] that what it is? That one is [126:46] fascinating, too, because you got the [126:47] guy who goes off to Africa and, you [126:50] know, and he comes back and you got all [126:51] these people that are trying to steal [126:53] land. So, it's not totally lawless, but [126:55] it's on the border of lawlessness. [126:57] >> Yeah. You're you're you're watching, you [126:59] know, Montana in the 20s was [127:00] fascinating. is a fascinating place [127:02] because you've got the 20th century of [127:04] the industrial revolution in full swing [127:07] >> and you have washing machines and [127:09] refrigerators and telephones and [127:10] electricity and then you still [127:13] >> you're still traveling by horseback, [127:14] right? Um so it very very interesting [127:18] and so so that that's a really fun thing [127:22] to explore, right? [127:23] >> That one dude who was the evil rich guy [127:25] on that show he killed it. Tim [127:28] >> Oh my god. That's right. Tim Dalton [127:30] >> who was Bond at one point in time, [127:32] right? Yeah. Crazy. [127:33] >> Yes. Yeah. [127:34] >> My god, does he play a good [ __ ] [127:36] creep. [127:37] >> Twisted. [127:38] >> So good. [127:39] >> Yeah. [127:40] >> I forgot that it was Tim Dalton. That's [127:41] how good it was. [127:42] >> Yeah. My wife watched that and looked at [127:44] me like, "How'd you think that [ __ ] up, [127:47] dude?" Like, I got the side eye for [127:50] There's a couple of scenes where she's [127:52] like, "Bro, what are you thinking?" [127:55] >> Yeah, there's a couple scenes I wondered [127:56] myself. I was like, "This is rough." I [127:58] was like I was like that's evil. [128:00] >> Some of the SNM stuff was like she's [128:02] pretty twisted. [128:03] >> But there's people like that in the [128:05] world. [128:05] >> 100%. [128:07] >> Yeah. [128:07] >> Yeah. I had to re I'll tell you what my [128:09] my computer I just assume that the CIA [128:12] and FBI have like a whole team because [128:15] the [ __ ] I look up when I'm researching [128:17] like how to make a bomb SNM practice [128:23] CIA hot regions in the Middle East and [128:25] it's all at once, right? [128:27] >> Yeah. Yeah, there's no way they're not [128:29] looking at your phone. [128:30] >> No, they're looking at it going, "Uh, [128:31] Taylor's writing something new. Look at [128:32] this." [128:33] >> I think anybody that has any influence, [128:35] they probably look at your [ __ ] no [128:36] matter what anyway, which is also dark. [128:39] Like, we don't even know how much actual [128:41] real spying on people is occurring. [128:44] We're just guessing. [128:45] >> No, we don't have any idea. Um, I think [128:49] within the world of tradecraftraft, a [128:51] tremendous amount. [128:52] >> Oh, yeah. I think within the world of I [128:55] mean within that world I think it's [128:57] >> how when you're writing that how [128:59] difficult is it to really keep your [129:01] finger on the pulse of what's actually [129:03] going on with espionage and like what [129:07] tools they actually have available [129:10] like are you making some up? [129:12] >> No, I mean most of the I mean I'm sure [129:15] there is some extremely high tech trade [129:18] craft going on right for sure. um [129:21] tracking devices and various things, [129:23] satellite imagery, facial recognition, [129:25] all of these things. But a lot of it's [129:27] also very low tech by it by design [129:29] because it's harder to it's harder to [129:32] trace, right? Um and and it's a lot of [129:36] leverage and manipulation. Uh you're [129:39] either bribing someone with money or [129:42] blackmailing them. And that's typically [129:44] those those are the two tools that that [129:46] are being used the most um in tradecraft [129:50] and in and the spy game, right? That's [129:52] really you you're it's leverage [129:54] leveraging individuals and they're all [129:56] doing it [129:57] >> everybody, right? every single and then [130:00] if you look at some of the and again I'm [130:02] not getting on any [130:04] completely apolitical but [130:08] from a trade craft standpoint what the [130:10] MSAD was able to do with all those [130:12] [ __ ] cell phones and pagers and [ __ ] [130:14] like you want to talk about play the [130:16] long game [130:17] >> like build this dummy company sell all [130:20] these get all these devices to all of [130:23] these people who are your enemy and then [130:26] start setting them off years later to [130:29] detonate. [130:32] >> Insanity. [130:33] >> I mean, it's genius. It really is [130:35] >> insanity. [130:36] >> Not endorsing it, but just saying, [130:38] >> no, but if [130:39] >> the actual act of doing it [130:40] >> to look at the patience and the planning [130:43] and the risks and and that that they [130:45] were able to execute [130:48] that is is shocking. [130:51] >> When you saw that in the news, did you [130:53] think if I wrote that, no one would [130:54] [ __ ] buy it? Dude, I do that all the [130:57] time with the news. [131:00] >> The Maduro rate, if I had written that, [131:02] >> right? [131:03] >> No one would. No. [131:04] >> Right. They'd be like, "That's too [131:05] simple. The [ __ ] out of here." Somehow [131:07] it goes down. [131:08] >> Yeah. [131:09] >> Even the bin Laden raid a helicopter [131:11] crashed. [131:12] >> Yeah. [131:12] >> Yeah. [131:13] >> Yeah. The fact that they were able to [131:15] and I know it wasn't as as smooth as it [131:18] was led on to be, but the fact that no [131:20] one died, not an American in invading [131:26] the Venezuelan military base in the [131:29] middle of Caracus. It's [ __ ] insane. [131:31] >> It seems like it went pretty smooth. Do [131:32] you think it went less smooth than [131:34] they're saying? I'm sure that there's [131:35] elements of like I'm sure right I don't [131:39] know how many the one thing I've learned [131:41] with all my research into the military [131:43] is any of these operations there's [131:45] there's a there's actually a line in in [131:47] the upcoming line is where someone says [131:49] did it go smooth and the the guy says [131:51] well smooth as these things go right [131:54] because that's because just by the very [131:55] nature you start sticking a bunch of [131:57] people in helicopters with guns and you [131:59] know shit's going to happen right um but [132:02] the fact that there were no casualties [132:04] that no one was killed, no American was [132:06] killed is incredible. [132:07] >> Yeah, it is incredible. It's pretty [132:10] groundbreaking. Like this is like a new [132:13] benchmark for what could be possible in [132:15] terms of an invasion at least of a third [132:17] world country. It's just shocking the [132:20] difference in the technology that the [132:22] United States possessed versus them. [132:24] Well, [132:24] >> and whether or not they were even [132:25] available that no knew rather that that [132:28] stuff was available. [132:29] >> Yeah, war is going to change very very [132:31] quickly. um [132:34] with drones, AI and and drones are going [132:37] to alter the landscape of war. Um we're [132:40] g we're getting real close to some [132:42] Terminator [ __ ] [132:43] >> Yeah. [132:43] >> And I'm not saying that like it's a good [132:44] thing. [132:45] >> No. [132:45] >> Um it it's a it's a it's a very very You [132:50] talk about adolescence of of us as a as [132:54] a species. We're seeing an adolescence [132:57] in the teenage years of new a new type [133:00] of warfare. And and when it grows up, it [133:03] is going to be a beast. A beast. [133:07] And I've just think about it. You You [133:10] can, you know, now they've got drones [133:12] that are the size of airplanes. They can [133:14] have a payload that is devastating, [133:17] right? Beyond just simply a predator [133:18] drone that's got a couple hellfire [133:20] missiles or whatever it may have. Um, [133:23] and someone sitting in a ConX in the [133:25] desert in Nevada can fly that thing [133:27] halfway around the world. Or don't have [133:30] anyone fly it. Pre-program it and the [133:32] thing flies itself. [133:35] And that's you give give the drone a [133:38] mission and send the drone off to do the [133:40] mission and it's fully automated. [133:43] >> Yeah, [133:44] >> that's some terrifying [ __ ] [133:45] >> I bet a lot that's a lot of what this [133:47] UAP [ __ ] is too. I bet it's [133:49] experimenting with that type of [133:50] technology with some sort of a novel [133:52] propulsion system because they were [133:54] working on novel propulsion systems way [133:56] back in the 50s and the 60s. [133:59] >> They were working on anti-gravity in the [134:01] 60s. [134:02] >> I don't think I don't think we're there. [134:04] >> I don't know. [134:05] >> I don't think we're there. [134:06] >> I don't know. I don't know where we're [134:08] at. [134:09] >> I don't either. [134:09] >> I don't know where we're at, but I'm not [134:11] convinced. I'm not convinced that they [134:13] haven't done something. In fact, Eric [134:14] Weinstein makes some really interesting [134:17] um connections between there's a college [134:20] in upstate New York, a university in [134:22] upstate New York that has a very [134:25] overqualified physics department and [134:27] it's connected to a hedge fund that does [134:29] bigger than Bernie Maidoff type numbers. [134:32] And he's like, "The whole thing stinks [134:34] to high heaven." and he goes, "And I [134:36] have a feeling that there's some sort of [134:38] an undisclosed or a top secret above, [134:42] you know, top secret access program [134:44] that's going on." [134:45] >> Oh, I can promise you there's something. [134:47] >> Yeah. [134:48] >> I've always thought [134:50] a possible [134:53] solution to petroleum as far as [134:55] transportation goes, and I wonder why [134:56] they've never tried it, is is using [134:59] magnetic force. [135:01] Right? If you have [135:03] you take a positive and negative charge [135:06] and you they're going to come together. [135:07] But if you take a positive and positive [135:09] or negative negative, they're going to [135:11] I'm no [ __ ] scientist, but you know, [135:12] it's going to repel, right? We've taken [135:14] magnets and they push each other away. [135:16] Well, how can how can we not use that if [135:19] you had [135:20] a vehicle and the base of it is [135:23] essentially a positive charge or a [135:25] negative, whatever it takes to make the [135:27] magnets repel. And then your road base [135:31] was essentially [135:32] the similarly charged metal. Wouldn't [135:35] that wouldn't that make it so much? [135:38] >> Wouldn't you have to redo all the roads [135:40] >> to make something like that real [135:41] >> or or put it in the road? [135:43] >> Yeah, maybe. I mean, it certainly could [135:44] be a potential source of transportation [135:48] for the future. But I think the things [135:50] that they're doing now probably relates [135:52] to some sort of anti-gravity propulsion [135:55] system. And um then there was that, you [135:58] know, I'm sure you're aware of this. All [136:00] those scientists that went missing or [136:02] wound up being murdered. [136:04] >> Yeah, dude. [136:05] >> How [ __ ] sketchy is that? [136:07] >> Oh, it's a coincidence. [136:08] >> From Los Alamos all up there at the [136:10] nuclear Yeah. [136:11] >> coincidence. [136:13] >> Yeah. [136:14] >> Yeah. [136:14] >> Who knows? I mean, who knows what the [136:16] [ __ ] those people are working on and [136:18] whether or not they made breakthroughs [136:19] and they don't want other people to know [136:21] or whether or not they want to stop the [136:22] breakthrough because they're aligned [136:25] with whatever the conventional [136:26] propulsion systems are and they don't [136:28] want to lose money. This thing makes [136:30] them obsolete. They get set back to [136:32] science for a few years [136:33] >> or tradecraft is it is it Russian or [136:36] Chinese or Iranian that Yeah. Oh, sure. [136:39] And that's the other thing that [136:41] Weinstein was saying is like it's really [136:43] shocking how little these incredibly [136:45] important scientists are protected. [136:48] >> Yeah. [136:49] >> They're just [ __ ] driving their Volvo [136:51] to the university and working on top [136:54] secret [ __ ] [136:55] >> Yeah. [136:55] >> And no one's making sure they don't get [136:57] whacked by China. [136:58] >> Yeah. Yeah. I' I'd be curious [137:02] and when they look into that, what was [137:03] it 11 of them in a year? [137:06] >> 15 over a course of a few years. And [137:09] some of them people are not they're [137:11] going this could be coincidence. But [137:13] there's a few of them where it's like [137:15] okay these people like this lady was [137:17] specifically working on spacecraft [137:19] metallurgy. This guy was specifically [137:21] working on cold fusion. This guy was [137:23] specifically like there's a bunch of [137:25] them where you go okay [137:27] >> something's weird. Something's weird [137:29] here. [137:29] >> Yeah. [137:30] >> Enough to the fact that the government's [137:32] looking into it. They're like okay there [137:33] might be something here. So the justice [137:35] department's investigating it. They're [137:37] trying to figure out what the connection [137:38] is and what could have happened. But [137:39] it's, you know, it's hard after the fact [137:42] to try to figure out who did something, [137:43] especially if somebody got hired from [137:45] another country. Like, they're not going [137:46] to tell you. Like, how are you going to [137:48] know? You didn't catch him. Did you not [137:49] catch him when they killed the guy? [137:50] Okay. Well, you're probably [ __ ] [137:52] >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It's It's [137:59] 15. [138:00] >> Yeah. [138:00] >> And they're all from that area, aren't [138:02] they? Los Alamos around [138:03] >> I don't know. I'm not sure. I think [138:05] that's part of the problem. It's like [138:07] there's whenever you have a thing like [138:09] this where people start looking for [138:10] connections, they can make some [138:12] connections that aren't necessarily [138:13] valid. And so like let's say if there's [138:16] 15, let's say 10 of them, 10 of them are [138:18] [ __ ] [138:18] >> Yeah. [138:19] >> That means five aren't [ __ ] If you [138:21] know if that's true, that's a lot. It's [138:24] five super [ __ ] brilliant people that [138:26] got whacked. [138:27] >> Yeah. And it's it's interesting that [138:31] you'd have that many in this specific [138:33] field in this period of time. [138:34] >> Yeah. [138:35] and and they're not, you know, you I [138:38] would think of a scientist as being [138:40] pretty [ __ ] healthy, right? And [138:42] >> I don't know about that. [138:45] I think a lot of them are just in their [138:46] own head, you know, and they're probably [138:48] not even paying attention to their body. [138:50] >> Did they all disappear? [138:51] >> Different people died from different [138:53] things. And one of one of the weirder [138:55] ones was this one lady who was uh I [138:58] think she's the metallergy lady where [139:00] she was hiking with her friend and uh [139:03] they were just hiking together and the [139:04] friend turned around to talk to her and [139:06] she was gone and she was just behind her [139:08] like 30 seconds before they couldn't [139:10] find her. They brought in cadaavver [139:11] dogs. They brought in search parties. [139:13] Never found her. And I think they might [139:15] have found her body recently. They see [139:18] they found I think there was a report a [139:20] few days ago that they might have found [139:22] her body. [139:24] I'd be I'd be looking real close at the [139:26] friend. Just that's just me. That's just [139:28] me [139:29] >> as a guy who writes scripts. [139:30] >> Hey, so so me and Joe went for a hike. I [139:32] turned around. That fucker's gone. [139:34] >> Hey, I don't know where I looked [139:35] everywhere. [139:35] >> I mean, I swear I had just talked to him [139:37] 30 seconds ago [139:39] >> and he's he's just not there. I don't [139:40] know. [139:40] >> No sign of struggle. It's weird. [139:43] >> Yeah. [139:45] >> Yeah. Like a husband and wife go hiking [139:46] and the lady falls off the cliff. [139:48] They're like, "Hey, buddy." [139:50] >> Yeah. [139:50] >> What the [ __ ] happened? You guys [139:52] arguing? Can I see your text messages? [139:54] >> Yeah. [139:54] >> Yeah. [139:55] >> Yeah. Or the one that just fell off the [139:56] boat. [139:57] >> Oh, what happened there? [139:58] >> Uh I I I don't want to say it wrong, but [140:02] I think she I think [140:05] it was out in the Bahamas. [140:07] >> I read about it. She She [140:08] >> Was it a cruise ship one? [140:09] >> No, no, no. It was him and his lady and [140:11] they're out on a sailboat or something [140:13] and [140:13] >> Oh, she whoop off the side. [140:15] >> Yeah, he had to Yeah. Something [140:17] something weird. [140:17] >> Well, go they're not buying it. [140:20] >> Goes all the way back to the Natalie [140:21] Wood story. You ever look into that one? [140:23] >> Oh, yeah. That's right. [140:25] >> Her and Walkin and Robert Wagner on [140:28] that. [140:29] >> Yeah. And Robert Wagner and her had a [140:31] big fight apparently. [140:33] >> And then she just [140:35] >> Whoops. [140:35] >> Yep. [140:38] >> Not the same person as the Metallergy. [140:40] >> Oh, which one is this lady? But she was [140:42] one of the scientists, correct? [140:44] >> Uh, [140:45] >> I believe she was one of the missing [140:47] scientists. [140:48] >> She was definitely missing for a year. [140:50] Which one was she? [140:51] >> I mean, I don't know what I don't know [140:53] which ones are [140:54] >> what was her specialty. [140:55] >> Doesn't she's missing lab worker? [140:58] >> Does it say what she worked on? [140:59] >> Nope. [141:00] >> No, [141:03] administrative assistant. Yeah, I [141:04] remember this lady. Yeah. [141:09] >> The other one was uh her name is [141:12] Reza. And the RESA one that lady she was [141:16] the one that has the uh so she served as [141:19] a director of NA uh NASA Jet Propulsion [141:21] Laboratory and she was in the materials [141:24] processing group. She se specialized in [141:26] burn resistant high strength metal [141:28] alloys and rocket propulsion metals and [141:31] wasn't she one that had like a we some [141:33] weird videos what she had made? [141:37] >> I don't know. Anyway, the whole thing's [141:40] creepy as [ __ ] [141:41] >> Wow. And she was hiking in the Angeles [141:44] National Forest. [141:44] >> Yeah. [141:45] >> Outside of Pasadena. [141:50] >> Yeah. [141:51] >> That could actually just be a [ __ ] [141:52] mountain line. [141:53] >> It could be, [141:54] >> you know, [141:55] >> or it could be a lady who's working on [141:57] top secret rocket propulsion [ __ ] [142:00] metals. [142:01] >> And like this lady's a problem. [142:03] >> Wasn't there some some town? I want to [142:05] say it's Arcadia in California. They the [142:08] the the mayor of that city. [142:10] >> Yeah. Yeah. Arcadia. [142:12] >> Yeah, she was a Chinese spy. [142:16] >> I would have to think if you're if [142:18] you've rec How many people have you [142:20] recruited that you finally go, "Well, [142:22] [ __ ] it. Let's try and get the mayor of [142:23] Arcadia. We got We got everybody else." [142:26] >> Yeah. They probably like worked her into [142:28] position to run as mayor, you know? I [142:32] mean, [142:32] >> and then and then with the hopes of she [142:35] was relatively young, right? Um, maybe [142:38] you go run for a state rep and then you [142:39] run for Congress and [142:41] >> be the [ __ ] president. [142:42] >> There was uh there was a thing in the [142:44] 70s called ABSCAM. Do you remember this? [142:46] >> Yeah. [142:47] >> Where there were all of these [142:48] politicians, [142:50] a few congressmen, some state reps, uh, [142:54] and they were all like Russian spies or [142:57] or at least on the take. [142:58] >> Right. [142:59] >> Right. All of them Soviet [143:01] >> Soviet spies. [143:02] >> Did you ever see that show with the [143:03] Americans? [143:04] >> Uh-uh. I didn't either, but I heard it [143:06] was great. It was all about sleeper cell [143:08] Russian family that was pretending to be [143:10] normal. [143:10] >> Yeah, that's fascinating. [143:12] >> Yeah, that's real. They did that. They [143:15] really had Russian agents pretending to [143:17] be American citizens. [143:18] >> Oh, I wouldn't say had. I would say have [143:21] >> Oh, yeah. No. Yeah, I think you're [143:23] right. Yeah. And Chinese. Yeah, for [143:25] sure. [143:25] >> For sure. [143:26] >> 100%. [143:27] >> Yeah. [143:28] >> No, plenty of them. [143:29] >> 100%. [143:30] >> Yeah. [143:30] >> Boy, how many Israeli agents are in [143:32] Hezbollah or in Hamas? Like probably [143:35] >> or in the IRGC. [143:36] >> Yeah, probably. They probably got a [143:38] bunch of those guys in there. [143:39] >> 100%. [143:39] >> Yeah, it's just wild. [143:42] >> [ __ ] it's tradecraftraft, man. That's [143:44] a [ __ ] whole other thing. [143:46] >> How hard is it to write about that stuff [143:48] and like get it right to get it [143:50] accurate? [143:52] >> I mean, you [143:55] I don't know. You You speculate a lot [143:57] and you look at at the past, right? [143:59] Because there's been enough. It's funny [144:01] because when they get caught never it's [144:02] never that big a deal. Like there always [144:04] some uh it it doesn't for whatever [144:08] reason the the news doesn't [144:11] there's we could pull it up. There's [144:12] been any number of Chinese scientists [144:14] over here and they were stealing this [144:15] and they caught doing this. It happens [144:16] all the time. [144:17] >> Um [144:18] >> see the ones that got caught trying to [144:19] bring in bio they were they're trying to [144:21] bring in [144:22] >> but what were they trying to bring in? [144:23] Diseases or something something? I think [144:25] I was looking there's another one in [144:27] Vegas recently, but it's like they have [144:29] these bolabs that are like being run out [144:31] of like an apartment or something. [144:33] >> CCP linked bolabs in American soil [144:36] exposes major bio security gaps. Policy [144:40] makers must act to improve oversight and [144:42] biological research activity. Wasn't [144:44] there a guy that got busted that was an [144:46] Israeli agent and he got released and he [144:50] took [144:50] >> That's the one I think was in Vegas. I [144:51] was pull that up. [144:52] >> That's the one in Vegas. Yeah. So this [144:55] guy, he had all these [ __ ] diseases [144:57] in his garage. [144:58] >> 1,200 samples. [145:00] >> That's [145:03] conclusion the conclusion of the FBI lab [145:06] that the community could not be harmed [145:07] by what was contained in that lab. What? [145:12] Finding possible biological laboratory [145:14] in a garage. Inside, investigators found [145:16] refrigerators with vials containing [145:19] unknown liquids. police said in the [145:21] immediate aftermath, the home is also [145:23] operated as an unlicensed short-term [145:25] rental. [145:29] What is this [ __ ] guy doing? Why? So, [145:32] the qu go up up. Yeah. So, the question [145:35] is, why does somebody have this [145:37] materials in a private residence? It's [145:38] not a doctor, not a lab, not a licensed [145:41] medical facility of any sort. And then [145:43] Homeboy got released. [145:45] >> Yeah, but check out the names on some of [145:46] the vials. [145:47] >> Oh boy. They located pathogenlabeled [145:50] containers with labels such as denge [145:53] fever, HIV, and malaria along with a [145:56] thousand mice or according to a federal [145:59] report. Federal government never tested [146:01] the items and the CDC only made its [146:03] determination based on the labeling. [146:05] What? What the [ __ ] [146:10] So in that case, Chinese citizen David [146:13] He faces federal charges for allegedly [146:15] manufacturing and distributing [146:18] misbranded medical devices. [146:21] >> He does not face charges. [146:24] >> He does not face charges connected to [146:26] the Las Vegas raid and a trial in [146:28] California was scheduled for April. What [146:31] the [ __ ] [146:34] Just a bunch of vials of HIV and AIDS [146:36] and [ __ ] deni fever and malaria. No [146:39] worries. [146:40] >> Jesus. [146:41] >> Normal. [146:42] >> So, what was the Israeli guy? The guy [146:45] who owned the lab. There was a like an [146:46] Israeli guy who they caught who own and [146:49] then they released him and he went back [146:50] to Israel and everybody's like, "Hey, [146:55] >> what?" [146:56] >> That's the same case. I think it says [146:58] feds drop case against man arrested in [147:00] Las Vegas Bolab investigation. [147:02] >> What's his name? [147:05] >> Ory Solomon. [147:06] >> Oh, Oie. What were you doing? Ary, Ary, [147:10] why do you have the HIV? Aie, there he [147:13] is. Fed's dropped case against man [147:16] arrested in Las Vegas Bolab [147:18] investigation. Yeah, I mean, why [147:20] investigate? Let it go, guys. [147:23] No big deal. [147:24] >> He had he was only charged with illegal [147:26] possession of a firearm in Nevada. [147:30] >> His immigration status precluded him [147:31] from owning or possessing a gun. Well, [147:33] listen, if he doesn't have a gun, how [147:34] the [ __ ] is he going to defend all his [147:36] malaria? People try to steal malaria, [147:38] bro. Got to be careful. [147:42] >> Oh boy. [147:43] >> Yeah, it just doesn't seems like someone [147:45] made that go. [147:46] >> There's too much [ __ ] [ __ ] in the [147:49] world to pay attention to and too much [147:51] of it is so disheartening. The more you [147:53] look into it, the more you're like, is [147:55] it all [ __ ] Is the whole world [147:56] [ __ ] Like, what is going on? [148:00] and and and [148:03] my guess is [148:05] because there are so many different two [148:07] things, right? There's so many different [148:10] there's no secrets with the internet and [148:12] social media and phones. Shit's getting [148:13] out, but it's also getting out at such a [148:16] volume that none of it seems to have an [148:18] impact. [148:19] >> Right. Right. [148:20] >> Just so much. [148:22] >> Right. [148:22] >> Think about that in the 1990s. [148:25] >> Right. They're talking about that on [148:27] Night Line and this and that and Meet [148:29] the Press and Chinese spy. That's an [148:32] Israeli, you know. [148:33] >> Uhhuh. [148:34] >> That's news. But now it's just another [148:37] >> the news cycle of flood. It's like you [148:41] you you drop a rose petal in the river [148:44] while floods going by. Like it's gone. [148:47] >> Yeah. [148:47] >> It's here. It's gone. [148:48] >> And it's a sensory overload. And [148:50] >> Mhm. [148:51] >> And and people are tuning it all out. [148:53] >> They're tuning it all out also because [148:54] nothing ever gets done. and nothing [148:55] happens. And the more people like that [148:57] get released, the more people like Ah, [148:59] they throw their hands in there. They'd [149:00] rather just [149:01] >> watch sports. [149:02] >> Yeah. Yeah. Just forget about it. [149:05] >> Yeah. [149:06] >> Well, [149:06] >> I can't believe Simon Sushu didn't send [149:08] you my book. [149:09] >> Yeah. Well, I don't know what happened, [149:12] but I'll listen to it on audio tape. I'm [149:14] glad you did the audio tape, though. [149:15] >> Yeah, [149:16] >> that's important. [149:17] >> Yeah. Pull up the You're going to [149:18] [ __ ] love it. It's [149:22] It's oddly entertaining and informative. [149:25] >> How did you have the time to write a [149:27] book? [149:27] >> So, what So, [149:28] >> you're writing 150 different TV shows. [149:30] >> So, so you know what it is? Do you know [149:32] anything about it? [149:33] >> No. [149:34] >> Pull it up. I just want to I'm going to [149:36] try and I don't even want to tell you [149:38] what it's called. I just want you to see [149:39] the title. [149:41] >> How to not die in prison. [149:43] >> I told you you're gonna like it. [149:46] >> So, here's the So, so here's the deal. [149:49] Um, [149:51] so when I lived in LA, there was a gym [149:54] on Beverly Boulevard right at like [149:57] Beverly and Sweetzer and everybody [149:59] called it Buns on Beverly because they [150:00] had all the the the treadmills kind of [150:03] right up there and all the girls are [150:04] there and if you get stuck in traffic, [150:06] you're staring at all their asses. And [150:07] that was my gym. So me and a buddy of [150:10] mine shared an apartment together and [150:12] we'd jog down there and work out every [150:13] day. And there was this dude that showed [150:16] up and started working out in there and [150:17] this dude was jacked but different than [150:20] like the West Hollywood fit. Like this [150:22] [ __ ] was yolked and had all these [150:24] crazy tattoos on him and and we became [150:27] kind of like friendly and uh and ended [150:31] up kind of becoming friends and his [150:33] name's Tom Nelson. And one day I'm like [150:36] so uh what have you been doing? He goes, [150:38] "Well, you know, I'm just start a [150:39] personal train I'm going to start [150:40] personal training here." I was working [150:41] over at the vitamin shop. guy's like in [150:43] his 40s. Like vitamin shop in your 40s? [150:45] That's kind of weird. And I said, 'Yeah. [150:48] Um, have you always lived in uh [150:50] California? He's like, "Well, I've been [150:52] here [150:54] 19 years." 20 years. Yeah. Yeah. I said, [150:57] "Where you from?" "Somewhere in the [150:59] southeast." I said, "You always live in [151:01] LA." He goes, "Well, no, I just got to [151:04] LA." "See, I've been in prison." I said, [151:06] "Oh, [151:08] how long?" "17 years." I said, "Oh." And [151:12] I didn't ask anything else, right? He [151:15] does become a personal trainer and I'd [151:17] see him over one day we have lunch and [151:18] we're bullshitting and I'm like, "What? [151:21] What? What? Tell me the deal." He's [151:22] like, "Oh, I was a [ __ ] criminal, [151:24] dude. Like a criminal. Like a real [151:25] criminal. Like biggest drug dealer in in [151:28] Hollywood and armed robbery and ran over [151:30] a DEA agent. Like I was a [ __ ] [151:32] criminal. But now I've, you know, when I [151:34] was in, I I I discovered, you know, [151:37] fitness. I started working out and I'm [151:39] like when I get out I'm gonna, you know, [151:40] he got himself in good shape. I'm going [151:42] to start this is my passion. I'm going [151:44] to do this. So, he was a trainer there [151:47] for a while and then he opened his own [151:49] personal training gym and uh and I would [151:53] go work out over there and hang out with [151:55] him. He's a cool [ __ ] dude. And uh [151:57] and it became the biggest private [151:59] training gym in independent in [152:02] Hollywood. [152:03] So, I go off and I I uh you know, I [152:06] start writing and uh I'm shooting [152:10] Yellowstone and he reaches out and he [152:12] goes, "Hey, I wrote a movie about my [152:14] life. I'm going to send it to you." So, [152:16] he sends it to me and I read it and it's [152:18] actually pretty good. Um but it's sort [152:21] of a fun '9s kind of they don't make [152:23] movies like this anymore. It's like we [152:24] it's The Rock, but we're celebrating the [152:26] you know, the guy the [ __ ] criminal. [152:29] But it was but it was good. But I said, [152:30] "Hey, I'll pass it on to some [152:32] producers." And but nothing ever [152:33] happened with it. Anyway, so COVID [152:36] happens. I'm stuck up on this ranch in [152:39] Montana and I call him and I say, "Tom, [152:42] where do you get your gym equipment [152:43] from? Cuz I need to build a gym cuz we [152:45] can't go to a gym. I can't leave the [152:47] ranch. COVID restrictions. The whole [152:49] [ __ ] cast is stuck on that ranch." [152:53] And and he said, "They shut my gym down, [152:55] dude. So, I mean, I'll sell you anything [152:57] you want." So I I sent a flatbed trailer [152:59] to LA and picked up a pile of jib [153:01] equipment from him and [153:05] didn't hear from him again. He calls me [153:07] maybe 18 months ago, two years, and I [153:10] and I answer and he's like, "Hey man, [153:12] I'm in a bad way." I'm like, "What's the [153:15] deal?" He goes, "Fucking I got he's a [153:17] single father. I got a 5-year-old kid. I [153:19] got [ __ ] colon cancer. I'm [ __ ] [153:21] dying and I don't I'm I'm tapped out, [153:24] dude. I'm a [ __ ] 60-y old felon. I [153:26] can't get a job. but can't do anything. [153:28] Is there any work on your movies or or [153:31] anything that I could do? And I said, [153:34] "Well, first colon cancer. How bad? [153:36] Like, what stage? What's this?" He goes, [153:38] "I don't know." They saw it on an X-ray [153:40] and diagnosed me. And I said, "Well, [153:42] let's deal with that [ __ ] first." So, I [153:44] fly him to Texas where I know people and [153:47] I get him in and he sees a doctor and [153:49] fortunately the mass wasn't cancer. So [153:51] they they help him out, do the surgery, [153:54] get that done. And then I say, "Well, I [153:58] mean, I get you a job in a movie, but it [154:00] doesn't pay very good, and the hours are [154:01] [ __ ] and you've got a 5-year-old [154:03] daughter. I mean, you you know, to just [154:05] be a production assistant or something [154:06] is not going to pay enough to off it's [154:09] it's not a great that's not a plan, [154:11] right?" He goes, "You think you could [154:14] like just spot me for a few months while [154:16] I try and figure [ __ ] out?" And I said, [154:17] "I have a 100% failure rate of loaning [154:20] money to friends. It doesn't work, [154:23] right? I'm not a bank and and buying you [154:25] 90 days ain't going to [ __ ] help." [154:27] Said, "But let me think. Let me think of [154:29] something." And so [154:33] it doesn't take me very long. And I'm [154:35] and I'm thinking, here's a guy who spent [154:37] 17 years in prison. And [154:41] you know what? I've never read I've [154:44] never read a how to not [ __ ] die, a [154:48] travel guide to prison. So I call him [154:50] back and I go, I got it, Tom. We're [154:53] going to write a book about my life kind [154:56] of. We're going to write a travel guide [154:57] to prison for the accidental inmate, [155:00] right? Somebody who [ __ ] up and they [155:02] end up and they don't know how to [155:04] navigate this place. He goes, "A travel [155:05] guide?" I said, "I'm going to send you." [155:07] So, I bought a bunch of Lonely Planet [155:09] Travel Guide to Thailand and Mexico and [155:11] and I said, "Look at these." Right? It [155:13] breaks it down. It tells you an overview [155:14] of the country. Then, it gives you a [155:16] glossery of the terms. They teach you [155:18] the language. They talk about the food. [155:20] They talk about where you stay. They [155:22] talk about navigating the country. We're [155:23] going to do that for for prison. [155:27] And he goes, "I'm in." I said, "Great. [155:29] I'm going to write all the intros. I'll [155:30] build the structure and and walk you [155:32] through it and you're gonna So, it's [155:35] literally a travel guide to prison and [155:38] it walks you through day one, how to [155:40] navigate the yard, being processed in, [155:43] the food, the commissary, the gangs, the [155:46] diseases, prison riots, how to get a job [155:49] in there, how to [ __ ] make a shiv, [155:51] how to everything. [155:52] >> Whoa. [155:52] >> It's a It is a tour guide to prison. [155:55] >> How many pages? [155:57] >> Couple hundred. [156:00] It sounds awesome. [156:01] >> It's the greatest. [156:01] >> I hope I never need it. No. [156:03] >> Well, most people who read it hope they [156:05] never need it. [156:05] >> I'm going to guess 99% of the people who [156:08] do read it, the one thing it'll do is [156:10] tell you you don't ever want to [ __ ] [156:12] go there. That's for sure, right? And [156:15] typically if someone's going there, I [156:17] even say in the intro, I'm like, if [156:19] you're if you're buying this book [156:20] because you're going to prison, finish [156:22] the book before you get to prison. Do [156:24] not bring this book with you to prison [156:26] or you'll die on [ __ ] day one. [156:28] leave the book at home. But yeah, so so [156:31] then we did I took the we we wrote three [156:33] chapters of it. I took it out um and [156:37] Simon Schuster read it, flipped and me [156:40] and Tom got a book deal. So [156:42] >> that's awesome. [156:42] >> So he, you know, he he he was able to [156:44] sit with me and we wrote it and he was [156:46] able to take care of his kid. And [156:48] >> that's very cool. [156:49] >> Yeah. [156:49] >> Good for you, man, for doing that. [156:51] That's really awesome that you did that [156:53] >> because I know you're busy as [ __ ] like [156:55] you having another project on your [156:57] plate. Not Not fun probably. That's [157:00] awesome. [157:01] >> That one was a lot of fun, right? [157:02] >> Yeah. But not fun to take something else [157:04] on. I mean, I'm sure you're [157:06] >> Yeah. But it was it was it was a very [157:09] entertaining diversion from, you know, [157:12] from my other, you know, I can [ __ ] [157:14] about my other job, right? [ __ ] about [157:16] something on Land Man or whatever. And [157:18] then, you know, I'm going to sit down [157:20] and, oh, we're writing about smallox [157:21] today. Okay. There's there's some [157:23] perspective. It's not It's not quite so [157:26] bad that Billy Bob is an hour late to [157:28] work, which he's never an hour late to [157:30] work, but but you get my point. But [157:33] >> yeah, it's a sobering thing. It's a It's [157:35] It's a [157:37] That's a broken system. You won't talk [157:39] about a broken [ __ ] system. [157:40] >> Yeah. [157:41] >> The prison system from the Alabama [157:44] Solution on, [157:45] >> you know, the guy who did that [157:46] documentary on Alabama prison system. [157:48] It's [ __ ] heartbreaking, man. [157:51] Heartbreaking. [157:53] I used to [157:55] be roommates with the guy that edited [157:57] all of those locked up. He would go and [157:59] film those locked up. You remember [158:00] those? [158:01] >> Yeah. [158:01] >> Go to Falsam and Corkerin and all these [158:03] prisons. Just Dude, it's tell [158:07] >> rough. And and not designed to [158:10] rehabilitate, right? All it's an [158:12] institution that guarantees you're a [158:13] criminal when you come out. That's what [158:15] you'll be. If you weren't a criminal [158:16] when you went in, which you clearly [158:18] committed a crime and got convicted, but [158:21] you're going to be a [ __ ] criminal [158:22] when you come out. [158:24] >> Like the people the guys like Tom [158:26] >> who I mean there's an 80s something% [158:29] recidivism rate in the US. So for a guy [158:32] to get out of prison and not go back to [158:36] prison, the odds are [ __ ] four to one [158:40] against you. Like it's [158:42] >> at least. [158:42] >> Yeah. [158:43] >> It's probably higher than that, right? I [158:46] think it's 80 something 80 something% 86 [158:48] 80 Yeah. [158:50] >> [ __ ] [158:51] >> Yeah, it's brutal. It's brutal. [158:56] >> Well, I'm glad you wrote it. [158:58] >> I'll read it. I I promise I'm going to [158:59] listen to it. I'll listen to it in the [159:01] sauna. [159:01] >> There you go. [159:03] >> Uh, thanks for everything, man. Thanks [159:05] for all the awesome shows. It's been [159:06] great watching them, [159:07] >> dude. Thanks for watching. [159:08] >> You're the man. [159:09] >> Appreciate you. I appreciate the guy. [159:11] >> We have time to talk about one more [159:12] thing. [159:12] >> Sure. [159:14] that UFC 250. [159:15] >> Oh, man. Yeah, [159:17] >> Justin Gai, dude. [159:19] >> Yeah, I just had him on. [159:20] >> Yeah, I know. It's incredible. [159:22] >> I saw him. Remember when I bumped into [159:24] you at that fight in Vegas? That's the [159:26] first time I'd seen him live. And I go [159:28] to a bunch of prize fights. I love [159:30] boxing. And I'm watching that guy. If he [159:33] had decided to be a professional boxer, [159:36] he would his striking is is that level. [159:39] like that dude, he went to work on that [159:43] guy. [159:44] >> No, he's a man. I'm glad he's a MMA [159:48] fighter because he started out as an [159:50] all-American wrestler and division one. [159:52] He's like very he's a just a great [159:55] athlete all across the board and just [159:57] his particular style of aggression is so [160:00] well suited for MMA. [160:02] >> Oh yeah. [160:02] >> It's just [160:03] >> it's shocking that he's that good a [160:05] striker and he was a wrestler. [160:07] >> I know. He's he's just a wild [160:10] [ __ ] like across the board. But [160:12] for him to pull that off the way he did [160:14] at the White House [160:15] >> was nuts. I mean his some books had him [160:18] at six to1 underdog [160:20] >> and Iliot is so [ __ ] good. He's so [160:24] good. And he had him in sick trouble in [160:27] that second round. Let's I watched it [160:29] again yesterday. The second round was [160:31] brutal. I mean Iliot was just destroying [160:33] his liver. [160:34] >> Yeah. Almost put him down. [160:35] >> Yeah. But even in the second round, [160:37] Justin was he still bloodied Ilia up. [160:40] His face was busted up. Like he was [160:42] getting the most damage to Ilia's face. [160:44] And that was a giant factor in the fight [160:47] cuz I don't know if what the accuracy of [160:50] these reports are, but what's being [160:52] reported is that he had two broken [160:54] orbital bones and a broken nose. So both [160:57] his eyes were broken and his nose was [160:59] broken. And Justin was here a couple [161:02] days later and he looked great. [161:04] >> It's just nuts. It's just like he's very [161:08] deceptively good at rolling with shots [161:10] and, you know, he's [ __ ] durable as [161:12] hell and just [161:14] very clever. Very clever in how he sets [161:17] things up and where where he finds [161:18] openings. And one of the things he kept [161:20] getting off is this. He does like he [161:22] does a collar tie into an uppercut and [161:24] he got that off [161:25] >> multiple shots. He did that with Phys, [161:28] too. He's really good with that move. [161:30] He's a beast, man. I'm I'm just so happy [161:32] for him to win. [161:34] You know, I'm a giant Iliot fan as well [161:36] and I think he'll be back better than [161:38] ever. And uh I think sometimes a loss is [161:41] like one of the most important things a [161:43] fighter can ever have because they [161:44] realize like you can be beat and you [161:47] need to know that you're a human. You [161:48] need to know that you you can't just [161:50] throw caution to the wind sometimes and [161:52] just engage in these wild scraps. [161:54] Sometimes you be you have to be a little [161:56] bit more tactical and sometimes you got [161:58] to realize like you can't take everybody [162:00] out and and that's the case with Justin. [162:03] They couldn't take him out and he almost [162:05] did in the second round. Got real [162:06] [ __ ] close. Real close. [162:08] >> But you know [162:10] >> that that freaking Justin he he can time [162:14] >> that transfer of power to right at the [162:16] end of the punch [162:17] >> and just his hands are so heavy. [162:19] >> Yeah. Everybody says that too. Everybody [162:21] who who he's fought has said he's one of [162:23] the hardest guys that that's ever hit [162:24] them, including Kabib, who's, you know, [162:27] one of the all-time greats. Said Justin [162:28] hit him harder than anybody. [162:30] >> Yeah, he's a [ __ ] animal. [162:32] >> Yeah, it was impressive, man. [162:33] >> And the fight was like to be there at [162:35] the White House while that was going on [162:37] and to have Justin so happy. Like [162:39] there's something about a guy winning [162:41] who's an underdog that is just so [162:42] [ __ ] inspiring. [162:44] >> He didn't look like an underdog that [162:45] night. [162:46] >> No, he did. Not after the second round. [162:47] He didn't. Especially the third. Once [162:49] the third rolled around, he dropped him [162:51] and then he he he uh got a head and arm [162:54] and snatched him down to the ground. I [162:55] was like, "Holy [ __ ] man. He's [162:58] >> he's [ __ ] dominating him. This is [162:59] crazy." Yeah, [163:00] >> it was wild. Wild to watch. [163:02] >> It was wild. [163:03] >> It was awesome, though. [163:04] >> It was fantastic. [163:05] >> Should have been there live, [163:06] >> man. That would have been a good one. [163:07] >> Oh, it was crazy. It was crazy to be [163:09] there live. It just felt surreal. I [163:11] mean, they had a fly over. They all [163:13] together. [163:13] >> Eight jets come shooting over, [163:15] >> bro. They were like separated by like [163:17] that far from each other. I don't know [163:18] how the [ __ ] those guys do that. It was [163:20] incredible. [163:21] >> Incredible. [163:22] >> Incredible. [163:22] >> Yeah, that was awesome. [163:24] >> Thanks, brother. Once again, the book is [163:25] called How to Not Die in Prison. [163:27] >> Yeah. [163:28] >> And uh available now, audio book, [163:30] everything. [163:31] >> Yep. [163:32] >> Thank you. [163:32] >> Awesome, buddy. Thank you. [163:33] >> Bye, everybody.

Taylor Sheridan Targets Federal Fraud, Blames Bureaucrats for Urban Decay

Detailed notes

[02:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=144s) Deafness in Prey Animals and the Zone of Focus

[05:28](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=328s) Neurodivergence as a Superpower and Educational Squeezing

[09:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=541s) Foreign Influence, Subversion, and the Homeless Industrial Complex

[12:47](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=767s) Portland's Radical Ballot Measures and the Anti-Logic "Vibe"

[15:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=902s) The Portland Ballot Initiative and the "System" of Nature

[17:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1024s) The Environmental Toll of Vegan Staples: Avocados and Almonds

[18:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1137s) Mid-Show Break: Wild Pastures Sponsor

[20:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1215s) The Truth About Almond Milk, Oxalates, and Kidney Stones

[23:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1410s) The Reality of the American Beef Industry

[26:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1575s) Life on the 6666 Ranch and Taylor Sheridan's Work Ethic

[31:28](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1888s) Streamlining Production and the Network Mentality

[32:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1968s) Crafting *Landman* and Casting Billy Bob Thornton

[33:29](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=2009s) Energy Dependency and Individual Nuclear Reactors

[35:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=2118s) Geopolitics, Oil Supply, and the Special Forces Raid in Venezuela

[36:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=2200s) The "Discombobulator" and Secret Military Technology

[38:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=2322s) UAPs, Advanced Propulsion, and the Evolution of Humanity

[42:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=2552s) Self-Determination versus Equity and the Trap of the Collective

[45:17](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=2717s) Institutional Distrust Post-COVID and the Failure of "Hearts and Minds"

[47:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=2847s) The Dangerous Slippery Slope of Rules and Precedents

[51:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=3070s) Term Limits, Political Wealth, and the Broken News Media

[55:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=3301s) The Wuhan Lab, Hydroxychloroquine, and the Suppression of Alternate Narratives

[01:01:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=3675s) The Fauci Playbook: From the AIDS Crisis to PCR Discrepancies

[01:03:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=3810s) The Political Realities and Scandals of the Covid Response

[01:06:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=4012s) Systemic Government Fraud and the Exploitation of Social Programs

[01:11:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=4314s) Inept Governance, Urban Decay, and the Reality of Local Politics

[01:16:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=4563s) The Brutal Reality of Fentanyl and Advanced Medical Alternatives

[01:18:47](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=4727s) Biological Options and the Importance of Spinal Decompression

[01:20:53](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=4853s) Experimental Discs Treatments and the Back Pain Epidemic

[01:24:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5044s) The Generational Carnage of Opioids and the Power of Ibogaine

[01:27:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5254s) Political Backing, Veteran Success, and the Homeless Industrial Complex

[01:31:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5512s) Stripping Away the Noise for a Simpler, Pure Reality

[01:33:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5592s) The Siren Song of Self-Reliance and the Siberian Taiga

[01:34:31](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5671s) Dick Proenneke and the Ultimate Alaskan Solitude

[01:37:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=5874s) Heimo Korth and the Early Days of Vice Investigative Journalism

[01:41:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=6114s) Human Origins, Gobekli Tepe, and the Imperfections of the Fossil Record

[01:45:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=6314s) The Dinosaur Tracks of Glen Rose and Ignorance of the Past

[01:48:39](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=6519s) Pushing Back Deep Time and the White Sands Footprints

[01:49:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=6594s) Unearthing Arrowheads and Ancient History

[01:54:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=6846s) The Brutal Reality of the Frontier and *1823*

[01:57:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7057s) Lost in the Woods and the Counterclockwise Bias

[02:01:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7300s) Eloquence of the Past vs. Modern Intellectual Laziness

[02:04:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7464s) Correspondence Culture of the 1800s vs. Modern Writing

[02:05:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7527s) Predictive Writing on *Lioness* and the Reality of Tradecraft

[02:07:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7643s) Dark Research and the Constant Eye of the CIA

[02:08:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7737s) Low-Tech Espionage and Long-Game Sabotage

[02:10:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7851s) The Realities of Special Operations and the Future of War

[02:13:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8025s) The Missing Scientists and Scriptwriter Logic

[02:19:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8383s) Bizarre Accidents and Celebrity Mysteries

[02:20:38](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8438s) The Missing Scientists and Covert Operatives

[02:22:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8523s) Sleeper Cells and Secret Biolabs on American Soil

[02:27:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=8866s) The News Flood and a Prison Travel Guide

[02:31:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=9066s) From Hollywood Felon to COVID Lifeline

[02:33:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=9185s) Concept for the Accidental Inmate

[02:35:20](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=9320s) A Travel Guide to Prison

[02:37:33](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=9453s) The Broken Prison System

[02:39:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=9551s) Justin Gaethje and UFC 250

中文简报

Reading summary

精炼阅读摘要

Detailed notes — zh

Source quotes

Source quotes

Original transcript

[32:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=1968s) Crafting Landman and Casting Billy Bob Thornton

[01:54:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=6846s) The Brutal Reality of the Frontier and 1823

[02:05:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYO2fJ-M_M4&t=7527s) Predictive Writing on Lioness and the Reality of Tradecraft