Rick Beato Fights Tech Giants to Defend Fair Use in Music

Rick Beato: Greatest Guitarists of All Time, History & Future of Music | Lex Fridman Podcast #492 — Lex Fridman

Lex Fridman

The music industry's aggressive reliance on automated Content ID systems commoditizes art and penalizes educational creators, but content makers can successfully overturn thousands of corporate revenue claims by aggressively filing legal disputes to prove fair use.

AI-assisted summary of Rick Beato: Greatest Guitarists of All Time, History & Future of Music | Lex Fridman Podcast #492 — original source. Check the original for full context.

Source published:

Detailed notes

## Background This episode of the Lex Fridman Podcast was published on YouTube on March 1, 2026, featuring music educator, producer, and multi-instrumentalist Rick Beato. The page description highlights Beato's career as a songwriter and interviewer whose YouTube channel celebrates legendary musicians and musical concepts, helping millions rediscover their love for music.

## TL;DR In this extensive conversation, Lex Fridman and Rick Beato explore the history, evolution, and future of music, highlighting iconic artists like Miles Davis, Mark Knopfler, and Johann Sebastian Bach. They break down the anatomy of legendary rock guitar solos, the role of imperfections in iconic tracks, and the unique songwriting processes of legendary figures. The discussion also tackles contemporary industry challenges, including the rise and creative limitations of AI-generated music, the commoditization of art on streaming platforms like Spotify, and Beato's persistent battle with YouTube's copyright system.

## Atmosphere & style The conversation carries a deeply nostalgic, warm, and highly intellectual vibe, driven by a mutual, profound reverence for musical craft and human excellence. Listening feels like sitting in on a late-night studio session where technical breakdowns of complex jazz inversions effortlessly shift into poignant reflections on loss, legacy, and the neurobiological highs of live performance. There is an evocative tension between a bittersweet mourning for the physical era of music and an energetic, forward-looking curiosity about creativity's survival in a digital age.

## Key takeaways - [36:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=2209s) Joe Pass entirely improvised his complex jazz pieces, utilizing an intricate arrangement of individual chord inversions and notes rather than simpler alternatives. - [38:35](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=2315s) Miles Davis is considered the greatest innovator in jazz history because he spearheaded multiple major stylistic transitions, including cool jazz, modal jazz, and jazz fusion. - [41:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=2469s) The 1960s Miles Davis quintet operated on a raw, rehearsal-free recording philosophy that prioritized live flow, creative risk, and spontaneous musical instinct over analytical thought. - [43:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=2634s) The bass guitar carries immense harmonic power in a band, functioning as the most important instrument because its selected notes dictate and define the core quality of every chord. - [59:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=3549s) Iconic rock guitarists possess immediate tonal identity and distinct melodic phrasing, enabling experienced listeners to recognize them from a single isolated note or brief vibrato. - [01:03:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=3785s) The traditional, hands-on studio mentorship model that trained past generations of audio engineers and music producers has vanished alongside the decline of commercial recording studios. - [01:15:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=4502s) The intense neurobiological roller coaster of touring musicians—moving from extreme onstage dopamine highs to severe offstage crashes—frequently acts as a primary catalyst for substance abuse. - [01:12:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=4371s) Fluid intelligence peaks during a musician's late 20s or early 30s, heavily driving spontaneous jazz improvisation and contemporary songwriting, whereas crystallized intelligence fuels late-career classical masterpieces. - [01:19:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=4744s) During his creative peak, Elton John maintained a remarkably rapid composition process, writing and recording entire albums in two weeks by forging complex piano melodies over lyrics in 15 minutes. - [01:36:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=5762s) Johann Sebastian Bach stands as an unparalleled foundational influence for generations of famous songwriters and historical classical masters like Mozart and Beethoven. - [01:45:28](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=6328s) Elite, established songwriters will likely benefit the most from generative AI tools by utilizing them as fast-paced idea generators to source initial melodic fragments or creative concepts. - [01:52:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=6720s) Human civilization will likely experience a cultural pushback against automated art, driving a renewed societal craving for raw, authentic human talent that is genuinely difficult to master. - [02:08:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=7707s) The modern streaming era commoditizes music like water from a faucet, diluting artist payouts and replacing the collective nostalgia of dedicated album listening with predictable recommendation algorithms. - [02:23:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=8620s) The digital landscape has fostered an optimization for superficial internet metrics, views, and viral fame that remains fundamentally hollow compared to the deep fulfillment of private craft mastery. - [02:30:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=9006s) True fulfillment and life balance stem from preserving deep human connections, proactively maintaining lifelong friendships, and prioritizing consistent communication with loved ones.

## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=0s) Falling in Love with the Guitar

The podcast begins with an introduction to Rick Beato, described as a "legendary music educator, interviewer, producer, songwriter, and a true multi-instrument musician" who plays guitar, bass, cello, and piano. Host Lex Fridman notes that Beato's popular YouTube channel helps millions of people fall in love with music all over again. Shifting into the interview, Fridman asks Beato about his early music journey, specifically inquiring about an epic guitar solo that he connected with "spiritually" and "musically" when he first started out.

Beato reveals that the very first solo he ever learned was from Jimi Hendrix's "Hey Joe." He recalls it being an excellent song for a beginner because it relies on a relatively straightforward chord progression: E, C, G, D, and A. At 14 years old, Beato managed to figure out the solo by ear, discovering a little pattern that he later learned was the E minor pentatonic scale. Because this was an era long before the internet, he couldn't just look up the tabs; he had to rely entirely on his own ears to decode the notes.

- **First Solo Learned:** Jimi Hendrix's "Hey Joe" - **Rick's Age at Start:** 14 years old - **Key Chords:** E, C, G, D, A - **Scale Structure:** E minor pentatonic

---

[01:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=110s) The Early Days of Practice and Playlists

An obsession quickly grew, leading Beato to teach the song to his younger brother, John, who was 11 and had started playing guitar at the exact same time. The brothers would practice together, but a fierce sibling rivalry quickly emerged. Beato would play rhythm for five minutes to let John solo, but the moment Beato tried to take the lead, John would throw his guitar down in protest, sparking a fight. Eventually, their mother intervened to ask what the commotion was about. When Beato complained that "John won't play rhythm for me," she offered to step in herself, asking for the chords. She would literally sit and play the rhythm parts for 20 minutes at a time so her son could practice his solos—an act Beato warmly summarizes with "My God, my parents were so cool."

Fridman points out that while the chords of "Hey Joe" seem simple on paper, Hendrix's rhythm style is famously complex, relying heavily on improvisation, chord fragments, and riffs. Turning the conversation to Beato's modern work, Fridman highlights Beato's "very opinionated" and sometimes critical top 20 list videos on YouTube. Beato smiles, admitting that his opinions "change, Lex, from day to day." He explains that he prefers making lists of 20 rather than 10 because it gives him the leeway to throw in "oddball" selections—such as fusion guitarist Allan Holdsworth—to expose his audience to something entirely unexpected.

---

[04:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=252s) The Masters of the 20th Century: From Hendrix to Django

Fridman playfully teases Beato, asking if he came onto the podcast to argue that Hendrix isn't one of the greatest of all time. Beato clarifies that while he hesitates to use the definitive label of "greatest," Hendrix's brilliance is undeniable. He traces Hendrix's lineage back to the foundational giants of 20th-century guitar: Charlie Christian, Django Reinhardt, and Andrés Segovia. Using Perplexity to look up live data, Fridman reads a brief bio of Reinhardt, noting his legendary status as a pioneering jazz guitarist and composer active in France.

Beato explains that Reinhardt is the cornerstone of the modern "Gypsy Jazz" movement. Reinhardt's virtuosity is even more staggering given his personal history: he survived a horrific fire that left his ring and pinky fingers essentially melted together. Though he could still utilize them to hold down certain chord shapes, he executed his legendary, blisteringly fast single-note runs using just two fingers. "And it's amazing," Beato remarks, as they listen to a clip of Reinhardt playing alongside violinist Stéphane Grappelli. Fridman marvels at the performance, noting that the music feels completely free, fun, and full of swing.

---

[06:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=361s) The Sophisticated Language of Bebop

When Fridman asks how much of Reinhardt's playing was improvised, Beato answers definitively: "Everything he's doing there is improvised." He categorizes it as a pre-bebop style, which smoothly transitions the conversation into bebop itself—a highly sophisticated genre of jazz that deeply influenced Beato's own life. Beato outlines how bebop emerged between the 1920s and 1940s as musicians moved away from massive big bands and began touring in smaller groups. Pioneers like saxophonist Charlie Parker developed an entirely new vocabulary of improvisation. They took standard chord progressions—frequently utilizing an AABA form—and built incredibly complex, fast-tempo melodies filled with angular lines and heavy chromaticism.

Beato defines chromatic notes simply as "connecting notes" that sit right next to each other on a keyboard, adding a rich, complex texture to the music. He emphasizes that bebop is one of the absolute hardest styles to master because it is a distinct, intricate musical language. Beato's own father was not a musician but deeply loved sophisticated, technical jazz, filling their home with the sounds of Charlie Parker, Dizzy Gillespie, Oscar Peterson, and guitarist Joe Pass. Hearing this music constantly as a young child subconsciously trained Beato's ear, giving him a massive structural advantage that is much harder to replicate if someone is first exposed to the genre as a teenager.

- **Bebop Era:** 1920s to 1940s - **Key Form:** AABA standard chord progressions - **Core Elements:** Fast tempos, angular lines, chromaticism - **Key Artists Mentioned:** Charlie Parker, Dizzy Gillespie, Oscar Peterson, Joe Pass

---

[08:53](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=533s) The Linguistic Genius of Babies and Perfect Pitch

Drawing a parallel to linguistics, Beato introduces his theory that every child is actually born with perfect pitch. He explains that babies start out as "citizens of the world," possessing the neural pathways to distinguish the phonemes of all 6,500 languages spoken on Earth. However, around nine months of age, they undergo a developmental shift to become "culturally bound listeners," losing the acoustic flexibility to hear sounds outside their immediate environment. Beato references a transformative 2010 TED Talk by language researcher Patricia Kuhl titled *"The linguistic genius of babies,"* which detailed an experiment where infants exposed to Mandarin for short sessions retained the ability to recognize the language's unique sounds later in life.

This research provided a lightbulb moment for Beato regarding his son, Dylan, who famously possesses perfect pitch. Wondering how Dylan developed an ability completely absent in the rest of the family, Beato concluded it was due to the intense musical stimulation he exposed Dylan to prenatally and during his first nine months of life. Fridman clarifies the term for the audience, and Beato defines perfect pitch precisely as "the ability to identify any note without a reference tone," allowing a person to instantly name a rapid succession or cluster of notes.

---

[11:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=663s) Ear Training: Perfect Pitch vs. Relative Pitch

The discussion shifts to Beato's commercial ear training course. Beato is quick to clarify that his course focuses on *relative pitch*, not perfect pitch. He argues that relative pitch is actually far more useful for working musicians. While perfect pitch acts as an absolute internal tuning fork, relative pitch is the skill of identifying pitches in relation to a stated tonic note or in relation to one another. For instance, if a musician hears an A note followed by a C note, relative pitch allows them to instantly recognize that interval as a minor third.

Fridman and Beato discuss how intervals serve as the fundamental building blocks for all scales and chords. When asked for a "TL;DR" summary of how to train the ear, Beato explains that it ultimately comes down to targeted, daily practice. Students begin with small intervals like half-steps (minor seconds) and whole-steps (major seconds). This requires identifying both "melodic intervals" (notes played sequentially like a melody) and "harmonic intervals" (notes struck simultaneously as a harmony).

- **Perfect Pitch:** Identifying a note instantly without any baseline reference. - **Relative Pitch:** Identifying notes based on their distance from a known reference note. - **Melodic Intervals:** Notes played one after the other. - **Harmonic Intervals:** Notes played at the exact same time.

---

[13:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=782s) Navigating the Practical Journey of Music Theory

Beato notes that with just a couple of months of daily practice, an individual can make monumental progress in identifying intervals like major and minor thirds, sixths, perfect fifths, and tritones. The practical payoff for a musician is massive: when trying to figure out a song by ear, relative pitch allows you to instantly map out the chord progression. Once you identify the very first chord, you can automatically deduce the rest of the progression because you hear how the chords relate to one another (such as moving from a six-minor to a four-major, to a five-major, to a one-major).

Beato emphasizes that ear training and music theory must be taught hand-in-hand because terms like "perfect fourth" are explicitly music theory concepts. "Music theory is just the name of things in music," Beato states plainly. Once a student masters the 12 intervals within an octave, they naturally transition into identifying chord qualities like major, minor, diminished, augmented, and suspended chords.

---

[15:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=919s) The Physicality and Mechanics of Guitar Playing

When asked how a beginner should approach learning the guitar—which Fridman proudly proclaims is "the greatest instrument of all time"—Beato advises starting with a solid beginner course focused on mastering open chords in the first position. The steepest hill for any beginner to climb is purely physical: learning how to arch the fingers precisely so they do not accidentally mute adjacent strings. Beato points out that experienced players take these microscopic physical adjustments completely for granted.

To illustrate, Beato mentions the iconic guitar solo from Pink Floyd's "Comfortably Numb." Playing a solo like that demands striking a string cleanly out of mid-air while executing precise string bends. The physical toll requires building up calluses to handle the pain, alongside mastering the exact placement of the string against the flesh and curvature of the fingertip to properly raise the pitch.

Finally, the duo jokes about the visual stylings of guitar players, comparing the textbook, strict perpendicular hand alignment of classical guitarists to Jimi Hendrix's iconic, rebellious "thumb over the top" grip. Fridman notes that even blues legend B.B. King had an unorthodox, seemingly messy hand position, yet his tone remained famously pristine. Beato points out that a player's hand positioning is heavily dictated by how low they wear their guitar strap. If a player wears their guitar low like Hendrix, a traditional classical wrist angle becomes impossible, and wrapping the thumb over the top becomes a functional necessity to mute the lower strings from ringing out through a roaring, high-volume amplifier.

[18:53](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=1133s) Micro-Adjustments and the Physicality of Guitar

Playing lead guitar requires an intricate web of subconscious physical adaptations. When executing a solo, such as the legendary ending of Pink Floyd's "Comfortably Numb," a guitarist must navigate the fretboard with extreme precision. For instance, bending the G string at the ninth fret carries the constant risk of accidentally grazing the adjacent B string. To prevent unwanted noise from ringing out, the player must meticulously angle their index finger to mute the surrounding strings. These subtle "micro-adjustments" eventually become so deeply ingrained through repetition that they happen automatically, without active thought, making instrument learning an exceptional tool for childhood brain development.

The initial phase of learning, however, is notoriously grueling. Holding down chords is a frustrating puzzle that causes genuine physical pain, particularly on an acoustic guitar. Fortunately, this discomfort is temporary, usually lasting only a week or two.

- Micro-adjustments include angling fingers to mute adjacent strings during string bends. - The physical pain associated with pressing down guitar strings typically subsides within a couple of weeks.

[20:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=1204s) Riffs, Picking Techniques, and Song Learning

Once a beginner moves past basic chords, the journey branch out into single-note playing, where the process becomes highly engaging. Song learning serves as the primary vehicle for growth, introducing distinct musical components like riffs and complex picking styles. Players might tackle the rhythmic single-note riffs embedded in the melody of AC/DC's "Back in Black," or delve into Jimi Hendrix's sophisticated chordal riffs that require utilizing all fingers while moving fluidly up the neck.

Different styles also force players to make a fundamental choice regarding their picking hand. Left-handed or right-handed players must choose between using a pick or their bare fingers. In many cases, musicians combine both approaches. * **Hybrid Picking:** A technique showcased in the beginning of "Stairway to Heaven," where a guitarist uses both their fingers and a pick simultaneously to isolate and play multiple notes together. * **Flat Picking:** Transitioning into strict pick-only patterns later in a song to drive the rhythm.

[21:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=1294s) The Philosophy of Practice and Motivation

When it comes to music theory, introducing scales and chords right off the bat is rarely the best approach. The primary goal for a beginner is to fall in love with music and stay motivated, which is best achieved by learning real songs first. Deep theory can always be introduced later once the passion is established. Depending on a student's drive, capturing that initial spark typically takes two to three months of consistent effort.

The key to long-term progress is daily practice. A short, consistent routine is far more effective than sporadic, lengthy sessions. A reliable rule of thumb is that practicing 10 minutes a day, seven days a week, yields far better results than cramming an hour of practice into a single day. In a busy life, taking even one day off can easily snowball into a week, then a month, until the instrument is completely abandoned.

> "It's better to practice 10 minutes a day, seven days a week than to practice one day for an hour, which is roughly the same amount of time."

To combat this friction, keeping a guitar out on a stand rather than packed away in a case acts as a visual prompt; walking past it prompts a quick pickup that naturally evolves from a few seconds into an hour-long session.

[22:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=1363s) Dylan's Viral Ear Training Video

The very first video on the channel actually found its fame on Facebook before ever being uploaded to YouTube. The footage features Dylan, who was just eight years old at the time, undergoing what was framed as "the hardest ear training test of all time." The clip was never intended for the public; it was originally captured as a quick one-minute demonstration for a friend named Shane, whose wife wanted to see Dylan's abilities. Shot in a rush right before a school board meeting, Dylan was initially reluctant to participate and actually performed the entire test with a mouth full of candy.

The video unexpectedly went massive on Facebook, amassing roughly 80 million views and drawing over 250,000 comments. The viral explosion was heavily driven by elite musicians. The more a viewer understood music theory, the more compelled they felt to share it, because the back half of the test featured incredibly complex, close-voiced polychords played right in the mid-range of the piano.

- **Polychords tested in the video:** - $C\text{ augmented}$ over $D\flat\text{ augmented}$ - $A\flat\text{ major}$ over $A\text{ major}$ (both played in their first inversion) - $A\text{ minor}$ over $D\flat\text{ major}$ - $E\text{ add } 9$ over $F\text{ major}$

[24:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=1458s) Discovering Perfect Pitch and Native Music Fluency

The discovery of Dylan's perfect pitch began around the age of two during a FaceTime call with his uncle Jon. Dylan was singing along flawlessly to the notes of Neal Schon’s guitar solo on Journey's "Stone in Love," followed by Led Zeppelin's "Black Dog." A year and a half later, while driving in the car, Dylan was asked to sing the *Star Wars* theme from memory after a week of listening to John Williams soundtracks. He nailed the exact key. When asked to sing the *Superman* theme next, he hit the correct pitch perfectly again.

Rushing back to the studio piano to test this phenomenon, hitting a $B\flat$ prompted Dylan to instantly say "*Star Wars*"—as the theme opens on a massive $B\flat\text{ major}$ chord. Hitting a $G$ prompted him to say "*Superman*," identifying the opening note of the trumpet part. Within five minutes, he was taught the names of the 12 notes he already inherently recognized. Dylan doesn't visualize colors when hearing music; instead, "every note sounds completely different," operating like a form of native music fluency.

- Perfect pitch can be conceptualized as a language acquisition process tied to early development. - Dylan associated specific raw frequencies with the themes of the movies he loved before learning formal note names.

[29:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=1748s) High-Information Music and Early Language Acquisition

Perfect pitch may be an inherent trait that all children are born with, which they naturally begin to lose around nine months of age if it isn't reinforced. To preserve and cultivate this, parents can expose their children to "high-information music" early on. This regimen involves playing complex structures like Bach's *Well-Tempered Clavier* and intricate fugues, alongside sophisticated jazz and modern classical improvisations by artists like Keith Jarrett and Turkish pianist Aydin Esen. This audio exposure can begin as early as 15 weeks into a pregnancy, playing music for 30 minutes a night against the mother's stomach.

However, audio exposure alone is insufficient. True language and music acquisition relies heavily on the "social brain." When a baby listens to music or language, they need to look at a parent's face and mouth to gather vital social cues. This interaction helps them decipher phonemes, learning where a word or pitch structural boundary starts and stops. Just as a fetus picks up the linguistic cadences of their mother speaking in the womb, they similarly absorb the foundational building blocks of musical language.

[31:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=1916s) The Joe Pass Influence and Learning by Ear

A deep appreciation for complex music can sometimes come from unexpected places. Despite not being a musician himself, a father's love for highly sophisticated bebop jazz can shape a household. Growing up alongside six siblings, the family never quite understood where their father's refined taste came from, but it led to shared, unspoken bonds. For years, father and son would sit on opposite sides of a room, listening to an entire record from Side A to Side B without uttering a single word.

For Christmas during 10th grade, his father—a man of few words who worked for the railroad and was born in 1919—gifted him Joe Pass's landmark 1973 album *Virtuoso*. He accompanied the gift with a rare challenge: "If you ever learn to play guitar like this, you've accomplished something with your life." The album sat unopened until March, but once it was finally played, it sparked an obsessive mission to crack the music entirely by ear.

- Joe Pass lived from 1929 to 1994 and is widely revered as one of the greatest bebop and solo jazz guitarists in history. - The learning process relied entirely on raw ear training, without any prior knowledge of complex jazz intervals or music theory.

[34:28](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=2068s) The Value of Musical Struggle

Replicating Joe Pass's intricate arrangements required a painstaking process of trial and error. Without knowing the names of the chords or understanding their music-theoretical framework, the only option was to test every conceivable combination of fingers on the fretboard. When tackling the final song of the *Virtuoso* album, fingers had to be moved blindly across unconventional bar positions until the sound perfectly matched the record. It meant memorizing completely foreign, wide-stretching shapes, unaware that they were simply inverted chord structures.

While modern aspiring guitarists can easily look up instructional YouTube videos to bypass this friction, bypasses can skip the most critical part of education. The modern educational landscape often focuses heavily on making learning as easy and fun as possible. While that approach has its merits, true mastery is forged in the friction. As the speakers conclude, "the struggle is where it's at."

[36:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=2209s) Deciphering Joe Pass and the Art of the Scratched Record

The speaker breaks down a series of complex jazz licks on his guitar, identifying a specific passage as essentially a $C^9$ chord played through its top notes, followed by a sequence of its different inversions. By identifying the underlying chord structures, he explains that learning the piece becomes a more manageable task of simply mapping out the individual single notes. His conversational partner remarks, "You make it sound so simple when you break it down," and pauses to praise the legendary Joe Pass as an incredible guitar player. The speaker notes that Joe Pass completely improvised the piece, demonstrating how Pass chose an intricate arrangement of individual notes over a simpler alternative. Attempting a particularly challenging run, the speaker jokes, "Ooh, that's hard. Maybe just play it like that. That sounds more realistic."

The discussion shifts to the physical grit of learning music by ear in the pre-digital era. The speaker describes how he used to constantly drop and pull back the needle on a turntable to learn complex sections. "This is just taking the needle, moving it there, then going back a little, oh, there," he says, adding that by the time he finished learning a piece, the vinyl record would be completely scratched up. Despite the damage, he insists it was entirely worth it. He recalls a nostalgic, humorous memory of playing the hard-earned song for his father, expecting a grand reaction. Instead of telling him it was amazing, his dad simply offered a muted, understated shrug: "Hmm, pretty good."

- **Technical breakdown:** The improvised Joe Pass lick relies on a $C^9$ chord and its various inversions. - **The learning process:** Replicating complex tracks involved repeatedly scratching vinyl records by manually moving the turntable needle back and forth.

---

[38:35](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=2315s) All Roads Lead to Miles Davis

The conversation transitions into the historical weight of bebop jazz and its profound personal impact on the speaker. The interviewer recalls a recent interview with Flea, the bassist for the Red Hot Chili Peppers, noting how surprising it was to see just how many musical genres influenced him, mentioning that Flea even showed up to their chat wearing a Miles Davis T-shirt. The speaker immediately jumps in to connect the dots, explaining that Miles Davis played with Charlie Parker when Davis was only 18 years old, with Parker serving as his true mentor. When asked why "all roads lead to Miles Davis" in the jazz world, the speaker declares him "the greatest innovator in the history of jazz" because he spearheaded nearly every major stylistic evolution. Davis began in bebop, then transitioned through seminal movements like cool jazz (with *Birth of the Cool*), modal jazz, hard bop, and ultimately pioneered jazz fusion with records like *Bitches Brew*.

The speaker details the two foundational lineups that defined Davis's career: the 1950s quintet and the 1960s quintet. The 1950s group prominently featured John Coltrane alongside Paul Chambers on bass, Philly Joe Jones on drums, and rotating pianists like Wynton Kelly. The legendary 1960s lineup consisted of Herbie Hancock on piano, Ron Carter on bass, Tony Williams on drums, and Wayne Shorter on saxophone. The interviewer recalls a quote from a previous episode describing Miles Davis's music as feeling like "toes hanging over the cliff"—a metaphor for the constant risk, danger, and willingness to completely mess up a live performance to keep the music feeling genuinely alive and on the edge.

- **Miles Davis's early mentor:** Charlie Parker, whom Davis played with at age 18. - **Stylistic innovations:** Bebop, cool jazz (*Birth of the Cool*), modal jazz, hard bop, and jazz fusion (*Bitches Brew*). - **The 1950s Quintet:** Miles Davis, John Coltrane, Paul Chambers (bass), Philly Joe Jones (drums), and Wynton Kelly (piano). - **The 1960s Quintet:** Miles Davis, Herbie Hancock (piano), Ron Carter (bass), Tony Williams (drums), and Wayne Shorter (saxophone).

---

[41:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=2469s) Thought is the Enemy of Flow

To illustrate Davis's high-stakes creative philosophy, the speaker shares an anecdote from his interview with legendary bassist Ron Carter, who played in the 1960s quintet and holds over 2,200 recording credits. When the speaker asked Carter if the quintet ever rehearsed with Miles, Carter answered with a definitive, "No, never." Instead, they would simply show up to the studio, look at the charts placed on their stands, and "just roll." Furthermore, they never listened to the tracks after recording them. This radical approach extended to their iconic live club recordings; Carter revealed that the bandmates had no idea they were even being recorded. He would occasionally notice an unusual microphone placed near his bass amp, and months later, he would discover a newly released album with his name on it, prompting him to take it to the musician's union just to ensure he got paid.

This lack of rehearsal and retrospective review was entirely intentional on Davis's part. "Miles was always about, you know, don't think about it, just play," the speaker explains. He connects this mindset to a profound quote shared with him by drummer Vinnie Colaiuta: "Thought is the enemy of flow." The interviewer wonders how this raw jazz ethos translates to a rock icon like Flea. The speaker explains that Flea’s heavy jazz roots come from his childhood; after moving from Australia to New York and experiencing his parents' divorce, his mother married a jazz musician. Flea's stepfather regularly hosted intense jam sessions at their home. The speaker relates this deeply to his own upbringing surrounded by his father’s jazz playing, noting that once that musical language gets inside you, it stays there forever.

- **Ron Carter's recording credits:** Played bass on over 2,200 famous recordings. - **Live recording surprise:** The 1960s quintet members were unaware they were being recorded live until albums hit the shelves. - **Flea's background:** Born in Australia, moved to New York, and was raised by a jazz musician stepfather who hosted jam sessions at home.

---

[43:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=2634s) The Power of the Bass and the "Gilmour Effect"

The conversation shifts to the unique energy of bass players and the inherent pressure of the instrument. The speaker, who started out playing cello in the third grade before switching to the bass in the sixth grade and earning an undergraduate degree in classical bass, views himself as a bass player first. He argues that the bass is the most important instrument in a band because it carries an immense amount of harmonic power. "Whatever you play in the bass kinda defines what kind of chord it is," he explains, noting that the bass player can dictate whether the root, third, or fifth is emphasized beneath the rest of the band. If a bassist hits a bad note, the entire audience notices instantly.

The conversation then moves to the speaker's process for preparing for interviews with legendary musicians. Surprisingly, he states that he never prepares formal questions, preferring to let his natural curiosity pull him forward and tailoring his queries dynamically to what the artist says. However, he does curate a specific playlist of songs to play during the interview to jog the artist's memory. He notes that hearing a track they recorded—even 50 years prior—instantly brings the memories and melodic intent back to life. This technique is bolstered by the speaker's exceptionally sharp memory for release dates, producers, engineers, and tracking details, as well as his ability to personally play all the instrumental parts of the songs he breaks down on his channel.

- **Speaker's musical education:** Began on cello (3rd grade), switched to bass (6th grade), and holds an undergraduate degree in classical bass. - **Harmonic role of the bass:** Dictates the quality of a chord by controlling the placement of the root, third, or fifth notes. - **Interview philosophy:** No formal preparation or scripted questions; relies on intuitive curiosity, an expansive memory for credits, and custom playlists to trigger artist recollections.

---

[52:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=3145s) Analyzing Great Guitar Solos of All Time

The speaker shares a lighthearted story from his interview in New York with Pink Floyd's David Gilmour. The speaker brought along his brother John, a massive Gilmour fan who works in sales but is also an excellent guitarist. John enthusiastically greeted the rock icon with a booming, sales-style, "David, great to meet you, buddy!" During the interview, the speaker jokingly asked his brother what they should ask Gilmour, prompting John to bring up the "Gilmour effect." The speaker coined this phrase to describe a recurring phenomenon in his YouTube comments section: whenever he posts a video featuring a highly technical guitarist with massive speed and chops (such as Yngwie Malmsteen), a wave of commenters inevitably chimes in to say, "Oh, yeah, that's great, but I much prefer David Gilmour." When told about this online phenomenon, Gilmour dryly cracked, "Well, maybe they should keep their opinions to themselves."

The discussion wraps up with a breakdown of the speaker's personal list of the top 20 rock guitar solos of all time. He placed Pink Floyd’s "Comfortably Numb" at the number one spot, specifically highlighting the often-overlooked first solo rather than the famous second one. He recalls the incredible experience of watching Gilmour's face as he played the studio track back to him—a recording Gilmour had played live a million times but hadn't actually sat down to listen to in years. The speaker notes that Gilmour shares a beautiful, phrasing-led melodic genius with Jimi Hendrix, knowing exactly how to use space and tempo like a spoken conversation. They contrast this with the technical and sentimental brilliance of other solos on his list, such as Steely Dan's "Kid Charlemagne" and the legendary classical-metal fusion of Randy Rhoads.

- **Top rock solos mentioned:** * "Comfortably Numb" by Pink Floyd (David Gilmour) — Selected for its underappreciated first solo. * "Stairway to Heaven" by Led Zeppelin. * "Hey, Joe" by Jimi Hendrix — The very first guitar solo the speaker ever learned. * "Kid Charlemagne" by Steely Dan (Larry Carlton) — Noted as an incredibly difficult solo to decipher. * "Stone in Love" by Journey (Neal Schon). * "Brother to Brother" by Gino Vannelli (Carlos Rios) — A highly obscure but technically punishing solo. * "Mr. Crowley" by Ozzy Osbourne (Randy Rhoads) — Highlighted by the interviewer for its melodic phrasing and the tragic, brief lifespan of Rhoads (1956–1982). * "Sultans of Swing" by Dire Straits (Mark Knopfler). - **David Gilmour's Gear:** Gilmour relies on an intricate, long-held analog setup managed by his guitar tech of 50 years, Phil, including a Binson Echorec and Hiwatt amplifiers. He also occasionally uses an early 1990s digital modeling rack unit called the Zoom 9030 for solo home tracking in Pro Tools, utilizing custom presets labeled DG1 and DG2.

[56:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=3364s) The Difficulty of Van Halen and the Genius of Mark Knopfler

Rick Beato explains that he strategically placed a certain solo high on his "top 20 solos" list early in his video because he wanted viewers to immediately realize, "Okay, oh, this is a serious list," and know that he was going to play along with the selections. Rick reveals that he created the entire 20-solo video in a single day, playing 19 of the solos himself while using actual footage of Nancy Wilson for the Heart solo. He initially tried to recruit some famous guitar virtuoso friends to play Eddie Van Halen's solo on "Ice Cream Man." He called Dweezil Zappa, who admitted, "Oh, I'd have to practice that," and then reached out to Phil X, who gave the exact same response. Rick notes that the opening lick of "Ice Cream Man" is notoriously brutal to execute due to an incredibly long finger stretch that actively hurts to perform, requiring Eddie to turn his guitar upward to manage the tricky rhythm and massive reach.

Lex Friedman is amused that "Ice Cream Man" was the chosen Van Halen track, prompting Rick to admit that he could have easily picked 25 different solos from Eddie's catalog. However, Lex shifts the focus to Mark Knopfler, asserting that "there really is nobody like" him in terms of unique tone, careful note timing, and masterful improvisation. Lex highlights Knopfler's soulful, mournful work on "Brothers in Arms," the interesting instrumentation of "Romeo and Juliet," and an old live performance of "Sultans of Swing" that has recently been going viral. Rick chimes in to add that the improvised intro to "Money for Nothing" is one of the greatest ever and nearly impossible to replicate because the sound is so distinct. Lex compares Knopfler's pristine execution to Carlos Santana's tone on "Europa," but concludes that Knopfler even beats B.B. King when it comes to the "power of a single note" and pure, clean beauty.

- Rick Beato recorded 19 out of the 20 guitar solos for his countdown video in a single day. - The physical stretch required for Van Halen's "Ice Cream Man" solo was too demanding for guest appearances without practice. - Knopfler's improvised "Money for Nothing" introduction remains one of the most uniquely difficult tones to replicate in rock history.

[59:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=3549s) Recognizing a Guitarist by a Single Note

The conversation pivots to the rare ability to identify a musician instantly from just a single note. Rick observes that iconic players like Brian May, David Gilmour, Jimi Hendrix, Eddie Van Halen, and B.B. King possess such distinct melodic phrasing and tonal identity that they are recognizable immediately. Lex proposes a video concept testing how quickly someone can identify a player from the very first note of a solo. Rick loves the idea, joking that he will "make that video tomorrow" and that Lex will see it the day after.

Lex expresses a bit of skepticism, wondering if a single note is too aggressive and if listeners might actually need three, four, or five notes to be sure. To prove his point, Rick shares an anecdote from the previous week when he was testing a video concept where songs were played in reverse. When his two assistants came into the room, they instantly recognized Adele and Nirvana just from the backward vocal tones. Rick realized the video wasn't worth making because it was far too obvious, proving that "you hear the tone of the voice backwards, forwards, it doesn't matter. You know who it is." When Lex questions if anyone could genuinely identify B.B. King from a single instance of his vibrato, Rick confidently doubles down, stating he can isolate the guitar tracks and promises to put 20 players to the test. Lex remains playfully skeptical on the record but concedes that Rick might be right when considering unmistakable differences like Stevie Ray Vaughan versus Eric Clapton.

- Rick's studio assistants instantly recognized reversed tracks of Adele and Nirvana due to the distinct timbre of their voices. - Rick plans to create a 20-guitarist challenge utilizing isolated tracks to see if listeners can identify players by a single note or vibrato.

[01:01:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=3671s) Sponsor Interlude and the Muses of Eric Clapton

Lex takes a brief 30-second break to thank the podcast sponsors, directing listeners to [lexfriedman.com/sponsors](https://lexfriedman.com/sponsors) and highlighting Uplift Desk, BetterHelp, LMNT, Fin, Shopify, and Perplexity. Returning to his conversation with Rick, Lex asks for the best Eric Clapton song, noting that they haven't yet touched on the profound importance of lyrics and meaning. Lex brings up "Tears in Heaven," which Rick agrees has a heartbreaking backstory, and expresses a personal love for the sonic texture of "Wonderful Tonight."

Lex confesses it is somewhat embarrassing that he didn't know the full history behind the music until doing a deep dive in preparation for his interview with Rick. He discovered that Eric Clapton was married for a decade to Pattie Boyd—the exact same woman who was previously married to George Harrison. Lex marvels at how this single woman acted as the ultimate muse for a staggering lineup of legendary rock songs, including Clapton's "Wonderful Tonight" and "Layla," as well as George Harrison's masterpiece "Something." When Lex asks if she is the greatest muse in rock history, Rick responds with a definitive, "Probably, yes."

- The legendary tracks "Wonderful Tonight," "Layla," and "Something" were all inspired by the same woman, Pattie Boyd. - Lex highlights his sponsors: Uplift Desk, BetterHelp, LMNT, Fin, Shopify, and Perplexity.

[01:03:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=3785s) The Mind of a Producer and Ken Scott's Abbey Road Memories

Lex asks Rick about the insights he has gathered from interviewing legendary music producers like Rick Rubin, Daniel Lanois, Brendan O'Brien, and Butch Vig, noting that Rick's own background in recording gives him a unique perspective. Rick points out a fundamental difference between musicians and producers: even a massive icon like David Gilmour will cut a record, spend years touring it, and then make another one. Producers, by contrast, are constantly juggling multiple records across vastly different genres at the same time. Rick notes that with someone like Rick Rubin, you can seamlessly jump from talking about the Red Hot Chili Peppers to Johnny Cash to Tom Petty. Rick laments that the brilliant craft of production and engineering is tragically undocumented nowadays, largely because the old-school studio mentorship model—where aspiring engineers started as assistant track operators and worked their way up—has vanished with the decline of physical commercial studios.

To illustrate this lost era of mentorship, Rick shares a story from his interview with Ken Scott at Abbey Road Studios. Scott started as a 16-year-old tape operator on The Beatles' *A Hard Day's Night*. By the time he was 18, he was tasked with recording his very first live orchestra for the song "I Am the Walrus." When Rick asked Scott where the band was during the session, Scott replied that The Beatles were literally "standing right behind me" in the control room. Rick expresses genuine awe at sitting in the Abbey Road basement cafe where Scott reminisced about the band grabbing coffee and being utterly amazed by the installation of the studio's first two microwaves in 1965. Rick reflects on how incredible it is that these historic records all began as a completely blank tape or empty hard drive before being filled with timeless magic like "Stairway to Heaven." Lex adds that the creators themselves often don't even understand where the magic came from, acting instead as if they are channeling a deeper force.

- Producers work on a much higher volume and variety of projects simultaneously compared to touring musicians. - Ken Scott recorded the orchestra for "I Am the Walrus" at Abbey Road when he was just 18 years old. - Abbey Road Studios got its first two microwaves in 1965, which fascinated The Beatles.

[01:06:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=4005s) Imperfections in Masterpieces and Creating Sonic Hooks

Rick recalls a fascinating off-camera or on-camera detail from his interview with Brian May regarding Queen's "Bohemian Rhapsody." May pointed out that at the very end of the track, he depressed his whammy bar slightly, causing the piano to sound a bit out of tune. May admitted that this tiny imperfection always bothered him. Rick notes that almost every artist hears minor details in their classic tracks and wishes they had performed them slightly differently. Lex points to the absolute magic of "Bohemian Rhapsody," specifically the operatic, highly complicated transition where Freddie Mercury sings, "Sometimes wish I'd never been born at all," right before the iconic guitar entrance.

Lex compares that level of singular musical magic to the legendary drum bridge in Phil Collins' "In the Air Tonight." He questions how such a culturally massive, distinct moment can even be engineered, noting that Collins—who often performed live wearing a headset mic—looked more like a telemarketer than a traditional rock star but carried an undeniable presence. Rick defines these unforgettable moments as "hooks," explaining that Collins' drum fill is just as much of a hook as any pop chorus because it is a distinct event that audiences eagerly anticipate and collectively air-drum to. Rick adds that these legendary moments are incredibly difficult to manufactured on purpose and are "usually they're done by accident," with Lex agreeing that if you actively chase that kind of lightning in a bottle, you won't catch it.

- Brian May remains annoyed by a slight whammy bar dip at the end of "Bohemian Rhapsody" that makes the piano sound out of tune. - The iconic drum fill in Phil Collins' "In the Air Tonight" functions structurally as a primary hook of the song.

[01:09:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=4153s) The Therapy of the Song Bridge and The Beatles' Evolution

Lex brings up Rick's interview with Sting, quoting the musician's observation that modern music has become increasingly minimalist, resulting in a landscape where "the bridge is gone." Sting beautifully described the bridge as "therapy"—a vital moment of reflection for the listener to process the verse before the chorus returns. Rick agrees completely, stating that the bridge acts as a space where a songwriter can fundamentally shift the frame of reference of a song. He points to the brilliant dynamic between John Lennon and Paul McCartney as a prime example. In "We Can Work It Out," McCartney penned the more optimistic verses, but the song shifts into a distinctly biting, "Lennon-esque" bridge with the lines: "Life is very short, and there's no time / For fussing and fighting, my friend." Rick calls this track a perfect representation of how different creative forces within a band can clash in a highly productive, collaborative way.

This leads Lex to wonder how the individual members of The Beatles, who were all massive talents in their own right, managed to create some of the greatest music in human history before any of them had even turned 30 years old. Rick offers a compelling historical theory: the live PA systems and stage monitors of the mid-1960s were so profoundly terrible, and the stadium crowds screamed so deafeningly loud, that The Beatles realized they couldn't hear themselves play and abandoned touring altogether to become a dedicated studio band. This forced transition sparked an unprecedented explosion of studio productivity. Rick highlights a staggering 365-day window where the band released *Help!* on August 6, 1965, followed by *Rubber Soul* on December 3, 1965, and capped it off with *Revolver* on August 5, 1966. Writing and recording three monumental, 14-song records in a single year kept their creative muscles perfectly tuned. Combined with the legendary production guidance of George Martin, it created the ultimate musical perfect storm. Rick compares their studio work ethic to local club musicians who maintain pristine vocal strength simply by singing four-hour sets five nights a week.

- Sting views the musical bridge as a form of structural "therapy" that allows the listener a moment of reflection. - Between August 1965 and August 1966, The Beatles wrote and released three seminal 14-song albums: *Help!*, *Rubber Soul*, and *Revolver*. - Rick theorizes that poor live audio technology directly catalyzed The Beatles' transition into a revolutionary, full-time studio band.

[01:12:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=4371s) Fluid Intelligence and the Mythology of the 27 Club

Lex notes that Rick has a broader theory asserting that a musician's most profound creative output and genius typically occurs before they turn 30. Rick connects this directly to psychology and the concepts of fluid versus crystallized intelligence. Fluid intelligence—the raw processing speed and ability to generate entirely novel ideas—peaks in a human's late 20s or early 30s, making it the prime engine for improvising jazz and writing pop or rock songs. Conversely, crystallized intelligence relies on a lifetime of accumulated experience. Rick notes that traditional classical composers like Bach, Beethoven, and Mozart actually wrote their most complex, monumental works—such as Beethoven's late string quartets and the Ninth Symphony—at the very end of their lives because they were drawing from a lifetime of structural mastery rather than raw, youthful improvisation. Lex agrees that creating something truly novel seems to inherently require the fiery energy of youth.

This discussion of youth and musical genius prompts Lex to ask Rick about the dark mythology of the "27 Club"—the tragic phenomenon where an extraordinary number of music greats died at the exact age of 27, including Jimi Hendrix, Brian Jones, Jim Morrison, Janis Joplin, Amy Winehouse, and Kurt Cobain. Lex notes that so much of music history is deeply intertwined with drug history, citing LSD, cocaine, heroin, and marijuana. Rick adds that even basic smoking was an omnipresent fixture of the era's creative environment. He notes that if you watch old footage or Peter Jackson's *The Get Back* documentary, The Beatles are captured onscreen smoking cigarettes constantly while working through their tracks.

- Fluid intelligence drives youthful pop, rock, and jazz improvisation, while crystallized intelligence fueled the complex, late-career symphonies of classical composers like Beethoven. - The "27 Club" includes legendary musicians such as Hendrix, Jones, Morrison, Joplin, Winehouse, and Cobain who all died at age 27.

[01:15:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=4502s) The Role of Drugs and Smoking in Music Culture

The discussion opens with reflections on the ubiquitous nature of smoking in past decades, highlighting Kurt Cobain's constant smoking during the iconic *MTV Unplugged* performance. Every singer and musician seemed to smoke back then. In stark contrast, when asking his son Dylan if anyone smokes at his high school, the reaction was utter disbelief, highlighting a major cultural transformation over the past 20 years. While smoking is recognized as a "deep integrated part of the culture" rather than just a chemical substance, it is viewed as far less destructive than hard drugs like heroin, cocaine, or alcohol. The conversation shifts to the intense neurobiological rollercoaster musicians face—experiencing the massive dopamine high of being adored by hundreds of thousands on stage, followed by an equally intense crash. Within certain music scenes, specific drugs are falsely elevated as being good for creativity, leading to rampant abuse.

Despite the destructive path of substance abuse, drugs have undeniably served as productive muses and inspirations throughout music history. While the speakers explicitly clarify that they wouldn't advocate using drugs to boost creativity, they note that smoking historically added a distinct raspiness, complexity, and richness to famous vocalists' voices across jazz, soul, and rock. It is a classic "chicken or the egg" dilemma, though the trend is heavily bound to specific eras. For example, the 1960s saw musicians experimenting with practically everything, deeply weaving substance use into the vibe of the time.

- Nat King Cole reportedly smoked four packs of day and ultimately died of lung cancer. - Other heavy smokers mentioned include Miles Davis (who also struggled with heroin addiction), Frank Sinatra, Paul McCartney, and John Lennon.

[01:19:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=4744s) Elton John’s Unique Songwriting Process

The conversation transitions to the legendary Elton John and his unconventional songwriting method. A firsthand story is shared from a recording studio in Atlanta, where Elton John was working in Studio A while the storyteller was producing a band called Jump, Little Children in Studio B. Elton's assistant came to check on the band, and shortly after, Elton himself walked directly into their session. The band members were completely stunned when Elton told them he was a big fan and invited them to hang out in Studio A after they finished tracking.

While hanging out with Elton John and his long-time lyricist Bernie Taupin, the group witnessed their hyper-efficient creative process. During his peak, Elton would record two records a year, tour, and write and record an entire album in just two weeks. Bernie would hand Elton a lyric sheet, and Elton would sit at the piano, coming up with the entire melody and song structure in a mere 15 minutes before instructing the band to record it immediately. This process is incredibly rare, as 99% of songwriters write the music first and layer nonsense words or finalized lyrics over a finished backing track later.

- A famous archival video on YouTube captures Elton John rapidly composing the music for "Tiny Dancer" right on the spot. - "Tiny Dancer" was written about Bernie Taupin's girlfriend, with Elton piecing together two verses, a mid-section, and a chorus incredibly quickly.

[01:21:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=4918s) Metallica, Improvisation, and the Search for Unique Sound

The speakers express their shared, deep admiration for Metallica, pivoting to insights gained from an interview with guitarist Kirk Hammett. The discussion explores the distinction between heavy metal and hard rock, noting Metallica's 40-plus-year evolution across multiple distinct periods. A technical highlight of their signature sound is the intense downpicking style used by James Hetfield and Kirk Hammett. The speaker notes that downpicking now causes him physical pain in his thumb, jokingly theorizing that modern smartphone use and constant swiping has degraded the basal joint, making the grueling downstrokes of metal guitar playing nearly impossible for average people.

A major takeaway from Kirk Hammett is that despite the rigid structure of heavy metal, he remains an improviser at heart, bringing a soulful and melodic layer to the band. While fans only hear the polished, tightly structured masterpieces on the records, those iconic tracks are actually birthed from raw jams, improvisations, and loose fragments of ideas. Kirk also gave immense credit to James Hetfield as an exceptional composer, musician, and master of rhythm riffs. The conversation notes how true innovators break the rules to find a unique sound, comparing it to Apple's philosophy of completely discarding standard operating procedures.

- Jimi Hendrix famously engineered his unique sonic footprint by intentionally using different gauges of strings on his guitar.

[01:24:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=5080s) The Quest for the "Perfect Song" and the Allure of Melancholy

Asking musicians to name the "perfect song" has yielded fascinating, surprising answers over the years. The concept of a perfect song is highly subjective and heavily influenced by a person's mood, changing "day by day, like minute by minute." When put on the spot, one speaker feels the immense pressure of the question but selects Mark Knopfler and Dire Straits' "Sultans of Swing" due to its great melody, brilliant lyrics, multiple legendary guitar solos, and a unique early Stratocaster tone that sets it apart from later hits like "Money for Nothing." The track also features a compelling meta-narrative because it is literally a song about music.

The conversation turns to the emotional depth of songwriting, highlighting how figures like Leonard Cohen keep the guitar work incredibly simple to let the poetry shine. This triggers a discussion about a dream podcast guest: Tom Waits. There is a deep appreciation for his Zappa-like musical artistry and masterful lyrics. His song "Martha"—a heartbreaking story about an older man calling a past love to reminisce about what could have been—is particularly mind-boggling because Waits wrote it when he was only in his early 20s. This rare ability of young artists to cleanly capture the human condition mirrors the Beatles, who fast-tracked their life experience by playing grueling, eight-hour cover gigs in Hamburg.

- Hans Zimmer surprised the interviewer by naming "God Only Knows" by The Beach Boys as his perfect song. - Peter Frampton, in a 2018 interview, named "A Whiter Shade of Pale" as the perfect song, inspiring the recurring question. - Other considered "perfect" tracks or artists mentioned include Santana's "Europa" and Leonard Cohen's "Hallelujah."

[01:28:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=5326s) The Comfort of Sadness and Great Frontmen

The dialogue moves to Billy Corgan of the Smashing Pumpkins, with whom the interviewer discussed the mechanics of creating his signature melancholy sound. Corgan jokingly claimed the secret lies entirely in "the seventh and the ninth" notes over a chord. Musically, this creates what Sting referred to as "surprise tones"—dissonant notes outside the standard chord structure that generate deep emotional tension, proving that "dissonance equals emotion." This melancholy feeling is not purely depressing; it functions as the other side of the coin to happiness, capturing a sense of longing, hopefulness, and intimate aloneness. This raw connection is often felt most deeply when listening to music completely alone, such as pulling over to the side of the road to weep during a Bruce Springsteen song, as described in a Louis C.K. comedy bit.

This emotional vulnerability is perfectly encapsulated by a Kurt Cobain lyric from the *In Utero* track "Frances Farmer Will Have Her Revenge on Seattle," where the chorus repeats, "I miss the comfort of being sad." In terms of powerful love songs, the speakers gravitate toward the desperate ache of Pearl Jam’s "Black" from the album *Ten*. The segment concludes with a look at the great frontmen of music history who defined entire eras, emphasizing how the unique, singular historical moment of the 1990s was completely captured by the contrast of Kurt Cobain and Eddie Vedder.

- The devastating lines from Pearl Jam's "Black" are quoted with awe: "Someday you'll have a beautiful life. You know, someday you'll be a star in somebody else's sky. Why, why, why can't it be mine?" - When listing history's greatest frontmen, the speakers name Freddie Mercury (likely number one), Robert Plant, Steven Tyler, Jim Morrison, Roger Daltrey, and James Hetfield.

[01:33:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=5589s) The Historic Power of Metallica in Moscow

The conversation centers on a historic musical milestone: Metallica's legendary performance in Moscow in September of 1991, occurring shortly before the collapse of the Soviet Union. The speakers highlight the presence of other massive acts like AC/DC and Pantera, and they immediately dive into a debate regarding the crowd size. While some official reports ridiculously claim a turnout of about 500,000 people, the speakers argue that because it was a completely free concert, official counts are vastly inaccurate. They assert the attendance was definitely over a million, very likely reaching 1.5 to 1.6 million people.

The speakers reflect deeply on how this particular moment in history was channeled through the music. Metallica was firing on all cylinders at the absolute peak of their game, meeting a defining and chaotic geopolitical shift as the 20th century collapsed. For a brief moment, the music allowed the massive crowd to escape their underlying fear and anger. Lex shares that he listened to the setlist several times over the past few days just to transport himself back to that cultural and social intersection. He rattles off the powerhouse setlist, causing the co-host to enthusiastically comment that it is exactly his kind of set list and that nothing could ever beat it, especially considering *The Black Album* had just come out.

- The concert took place in Moscow in September 1991. - Other featured bands included AC/DC and Pantera. - The estimated crowd size was between 1.5 and 1.6 million people. - The setlist included: "Enter Sandman", "Creeping Death", "Harvester of Sorrow", "Fade to Black", "Sad but True", "Master of Puppets", "Seek and Destroy", "For Whom the Bell Tolls", "One", and "Whiplash". - When asked if he likes massive live shows, the co-host admits he now prefers small clubs or listening to musicians directly in the studio.

---

[01:35:53](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=5753s) Beethoven’s Tragic Mastery and the Ninth Symphony

The discussion transitions from modern rock history to classical music, identifying Beethoven’s world premiere of his Ninth Symphony as another candidate for one of the greatest concerts of all time. One speaker admits he didn't truly grasp the personal, human side of the composer until seeing the movie *Immortal Beloved* starring Gary Oldman, which he describes as a masterful celebration of Beethoven told through the perspective of a love letter. A central focus is the staggering, tragic reality that Beethoven went completely deaf before he even began writing the Ninth Symphony, forcing him to edit the entire complex composition entirely inside his own head.

The speakers marvel at the sheer tragic element of the premiere, recounting the famous story where Beethoven had to be physically turned around at the end of the performance because he could not hear the roaring applause of the audience. They analyze the structural narrative of the symphony, noting how it transitions from initial chaos and conflict into the beautiful "Ode to Joy"—a profound call for peace and brotherly unity. This message is underscored by its historical placement in a brief respite from war, sitting after the Napoleonic Wars but before the devastating conflicts of the American Civil War and the two World Wars.

- *Immortal Beloved* is highlighted as an excellent biographical film starring Gary Oldman. - Beethoven was completely deaf before he commenced writing the Ninth Symphony. - The piece is framed historically between the Napoleonic Wars and the American Civil War. - The speakers note that Beethoven was constantly plagued by illness, which was common for the era.

---

[01:38:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=5899s) The Motivation of a Deaf Composer and the Heiligenstadt Testament

The speakers ponder the profound psychological motivation required to spend countless hours writing a 35-to-40-minute orchestral piece that you will never actually hear outside of your own mind. To orchestrate and edit all those individual parts purely through mental imagery requires an unimaginable drive. The co-host references the Heiligenstadt Testament, a deeply moving letter Beethoven wrote to his brothers in 1802 and left hidden in his desk until his death. In it, Beethoven expressed intense shame and humiliation over his progressive hearing loss, lamenting the cruel irony that he, a musician, could not hear a nearby flute or a shepherd singing in a field.

The dialogue addresses the technical necessity of having perfect pitch to compose under such conditions, noting that nearly all great composers possessed it, with Brahms being a rare exception. Lex asks what it must have been like to gradually lose one's hearing, to which the co-host responds that it must have been absolutely terrible. He shares an anecdote of Beethoven placing a wooden stick in his mouth and pressing it against the piano's soundboard so he could feel the musical vibrations directly in his skull. Despite this immense torment, Beethoven resisted cynicism, ultimately delivering a positive call for hope rather than a bitter reflection.

- The Heiligenstadt Testament was written by Beethoven to his brothers in 1802 and discovered after his death. - Beethoven used a physical stick in his mouth against the piano soundboard to feel notes through bone conduction. - The great composers relied heavily on perfect pitch; the speaker notes Brahms uniquely did not have it. - Lex admits he knows how to play the first movement of "Moonlight Sonata" but avoids the complex third movement because he feels he will "never be good enough." He jokes that his ultimate motivation would be receiving an email from Tom Waits saying he only does interviews with people who can play the third movement.

---

[01:42:36](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=6156s) The Supreme Influence of Johann Sebastian Bach

The conversation shifts to Johann Sebastian Bach, whom the co-host boldly declares as "the greatest composer of all time, the greatest musician of all time." He asserts that every single famous songwriter has been deeply influenced by Bach, pointing out that modern icons like Sting and his guitarist Dominic Miller still play Bach every single day as a foundational practice. Though Bach was primarily known only locally during his lifetime in places like Eisenach and Leipzig, his genius was well-known to subsequent masters like Mozart and Beethoven, who intensely studied his two books of *The Well-Tempered Clavier*.

The speakers discuss the revival of Bach's music, specifically mentioning Felix Mendelssohn's historic performance of the *St. Matthew Passion* in Berlin on March 11, 1829, when Mendelssohn was just 20 years old. Mendelssohn was able to pull this off because his parents actively collected rare manuscripts. The co-host praises Bach's incredibly complex contrapuntal work, alongside his staggering productivity. He notes that Bach achieved all this while managing an intense personal life, having lost both parents within a nine-month span when he was nine years old, and fathering 20 children, of whom only 10 survived to adulthood.

- Felix Mendelssohn conducted a landmark revival of the *St. Matthew Passion* on March 11, 1829, in Berlin at age 20. - Master composers like Mozart and Beethoven heavily studied Bach's *The Well-Tempered Clavier*. - Bach was born in Eisenach and spent many major working years in Leipzig. - The co-host jokes that while Bach "didn't write Master of Puppets, but he wrote some great powerful music." - The co-host reveals that whenever he tests out a new guitar amplifier to see if the bottom end is tight, his go-to riff is always Metallica's "Master of Puppets," or alternative metal bands like Alice in Chains and Tool in drop D tuning.

---

[01:45:28](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=6328s) Debunking the AI Music Panic and Tracking Its Evolution

The dialogue moves into a highly contemporary topic: the massive public anxiety surrounding the rise of text-to-song artificial intelligence applications like Suno, Udio, and ElevenLabs Music. Lex notes that people started completely freaking out, imagining an immediate future where human musicians are entirely replaced by early, nerve-wracking iterations of these tools. However, the co-host urges everyone to "chill" and "calm down." He argues that the people who will actually benefit the most from AI are established, great songwriters who possess the elite taste required to sift through hundreds of generated clips to recognize a genuinely good idea.

Lex observes that the human ear is incredibly adaptive and is already becoming rapidly attuned to "AI slop," pointing to a viral soul-jazz remix of 50 Cent’s "Many Men" that seems impressive at first but ultimately lacks true soul. He insists that when listening to genres deeply rooted in human suffering like blues or soul, audiences want raw authenticity: "I don't want an AI B.B. King... if any AI is involved in the B.B. King process, I'm tuning out."

The co-host shares a personal timeline of testing AI generation tools, detailing how his kids could instantly identify AI tracks from another room due to high-frequency artifacts and poor vocal reverbs. This occurred because early models were trained on low-bitrate MP3 files. However, as AI companies strike licensing deals with major music labels to train models on high-quality WAV files and isolated multi-tracks, the realism has scaled dramatically. He recounts playing an AI-generated song called "Neon Ghosts" for his daughter, who was stunned by how lifelike the isolated vocal track sounded. Ultimately, Lex argues that the true remaining fortress for human creativity lies in lyrics, because AI-generated prose still lacks a sharp, non-cliché, genuinely novel "edge."

- Prominent AI music apps mentioned include Suno, Udio, and ElevenLabs Music. - The co-host created tracks using fake artist personas: "Eli Mercer" for an online video, "Sadie Winters" (song: "Walking Away") for a CBS News segment, and a track called "Neon Ghosts" for an NPR interview. - His creative workflow involved generating images in ChatGPT, writing lyrics in Claude (noting Claude is far superior to Suno at writing lyrics), and importing them into Suno. - Out of roughly 130 AI song ideas the co-host generated, he found only three to be genuinely high quality. - Early AI audio artifacts stemmed from training models on poor-quality MP3s, a dynamic changing as major labels open up pristine multitracks for official training (with potential royalty models for artists like Ed Sheeran or Drake).

[01:52:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=6720s) AI as an Idea Generator vs. the Loss of Instruments

The discussion centers on the creative role of musicians in an era where AI can generate highly realistic, great-sounding music. One perspective suggests that AI serves as an effective "idea generator" or assistant. A musician can use AI to spark initial concepts, then step in to productionally refine the track, re-write sections, re-sing parts, and polish low-quality sonic elements. However, this raises the poignant question of whether it is disheartening that future creators may never actually need to learn an instrument, instead merely humming melodies, writing lyrics, and stitching AI-generated rhythm blocks together without ever touching a guitar or a drumstick.

Rick Beato firmly states that this exact dynamic is why he refuses to use AI for his own creative work, calling the process inherently "boring." While he monitors the technology's rapid advancement by sitting down every three or four months to prompt and write test songs with new versions, he finds no personal interest in it. Lex Fridman agrees, acknowledging their shared "old school" mentality, but adds that even looking toward the future, the consumption and creation of pure AI music will remain fundamentally unengaging.

* Lex compares this to programming, where he uses AI heavily because the final output is not the code itself, but what the code *creates*. In music, because the final output is the creative artifact itself, automated generation saps its value. * The speakers predict a cultural pushback where civilization will crave "raw talent" because people fundamentally want to celebrate things that are difficult to create. * Lex muses that the new version of raw talent demanded by civilization might shift away from traditional instruments toward something else, like the talent required to make great TikToks, though he admits this makes him sad as a fan of long-form content.

---

[01:55:38](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=6938s) The Flood of "AI Slop" and the Value of Authenticity

The conversation shifts to the user experience of AI content on social media. Rick notes that he and his children can instantly spot AI-generated videos "a mile away" and immediately dismiss them as boring, which poses a retention danger to social media platforms if users choose to disengage entirely. He commends YouTube for doing a relatively good job of cracking down on what he terms "AI slop," though he acknowledges the platform faces a constant, exhausting game of whack-a-mole because the material is so easy to flood into the ecosystem.

Lex views this deluge as an unintentional catalyst for a cultural renaissance of authenticity. Because AI is incredibly proficient at producing polished, overproduced content, human audiences are increasingly drawn to raw, long-form spaces—like podcasts—where people are simply "shooting shit" and being themselves. He expresses skepticism that true musical artists will extensively use macro AI generation tools, noting that generating endless options and filtering through them is a frustrating, counter-intuitive process for a creator.

* AI is highly effective and increasingly integrated as a fine-grained tool for specific editing tasks, such as Photoshop in the image domain or iZotope RX software in audio production for de-noising, removing wind, and isolating tracks. * Machine learning is also expected to be heavily utilized for generating B-roll footage or background audio to establish the mood of a scene, but not for truly original artistic expressions. * Rick shares a practical production example where he uses AI isolation tools to separate overlapping dialogue from heavy microphone bleed when an interview takes place right next to someone playing live music.

---

[01:58:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=7126s) Sponsorship Break & The Machinery of Modern Pop Songwriting

Following a brief sponsorship break highlighting UPLIFT Desk, BetterHelp, Element, Fin, Shopify, and Perplexity, Lex directs the conversation to one of Rick's video breakdowns analyzing Sabrina Carpenter's song *Manchild*. The video serves as a case study for how modern pop music production and songwriting operate. Rick recounts how record producer Jack Antonoff, alongside co-writers Amy Allen and Sabrina Carpenter, referenced an "old guy on YouTube"—meaning Rick—who claimed Carpenter had minimal involvement in the writing. When Antonoff publicly defended her by asserting she wrote everything, Rick's immediate response was: "Well, why are you guys even included on the songwriting then?"

This points to a broader trend in the music industry where pop tracks frequently feature massive writing credits of 10 or 11 people. Rick criticizes how the industry celebrates "Song of the Year" nominees that rely heavily on interpolations—which he notes "they used to call it stealing"—or wholesale samples. He points to a current track by Doechii that utilizes a 2011 Gotye song (which itself sampled Luiz Bonfá from 1967), removing the original melody to sing a new one over an existing, proven track. While it saves time, both agree it feels creatively unfair to celebrate it at the highest level of the industry when original material is overlooked.

* **Industry Exceptions:** Despite criticizing the corporate pop machinery, Lex and Rick praise top-tier mainstream artists who possess genuine musical craftsmanship. * Bruno Mars is highlighted as an incredible songwriter and an all-around phenomenal musician, described by Lex as "a Michael Jackson reincarnated." * Billie Eilish and her brother Finneas are praised as super talented self-contained writers. * Taylor Swift is recognized as a historic, definitive singer-songwriter who "carries the flame forward," uniquely maintaining total creative control by never utilizing more than two co-writers on her songs.

---

[02:02:47](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=7367s) The Constant Battle with YouTube Copyright and Fair Use

Lex transitions into the visceral logistical challenges Rick faces on YouTube regarding copyright claims. Because Rick's channel focuses on celebrating and breaking down music, he frequently features short clips of songs under the umbrella of fair use. Despite this, he is hit with an insane volume of Content ID claims from major labels like WMG and UMG. Lex notes that receiving three copyright strikes can entirely delete a channel, drawing a parallel to his own experience during his Rick Rubin episode. Rick reveals that on a single video, such as a countdown of the top 20 guitar solos, he can easily receive 20 distinct Content ID claims targeting either the sound recording or the underlying publishing rights.

Rick explains that for the first nine years of his decade-long channel, major labels acted as outright "blockers," completely taking down videos containing classic acts like Guns N' Roses, AC/DC, Fleetwood Mac, and Led Zeppelin. A turning point occurred when a viral TikTok video of a skateboarder drinking Ocean Spray juice while listening to Fleetwood Mac's *Dreams* propelled the decades-old track back to number one. Realizing the promotional power of creators, labels shifted their strategy from outright blocking to total demonetization. Under this system, if a creator uses a mere 20-second clip within a one-hour video, the corporate label claims 100% of the video's revenue.

* After the Rick Rubin video, Rick finally hired a copyright lawyer—who is also a fellow YouTuber—to systematically fight back, an endeavor he notes is not cheap. * Rick's lawyer reviewed his catalog of 2,100 videos, filed disputes against 4,000 Content ID claims, and successfully won every single one by proving fair use. * Major labels historically outsourced this process to third parties utilizing AI to scan the biggest channels for easy monetization, relying on the fact that most YouTubers were too afraid of losing their channels to fight back. * Rick advises other creators to aggressively fight false Content ID claims if their content is legitimate fair use, such as educational breakdowns, structural analyses, or instructional commentary.

---

[02:08:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=7707s) How Spotify Commodity and the Loss of the "Physical Stash"

The segment concludes with a reflection on how Spotify and streaming platforms have fundamentally altered humanity's relationship with music. Rick describes music in the streaming era as a mere "commodity," equating it to "turning on a water faucet." While streaming offers unprecedented convenience, speed, and immediate access to explore every genre of music imaginable, it has stripped away the inherent scarcity that once defined music consumption.

Lex shares a personal, nostalgic anecdote about the painful multi-step transition from physical media to digital streaming. He recalls the era of owning hard copy albums and CDs, which he eventually ripped into a computer. This digital collection was subsequently supplemented by extra songs pirated "allegedly" by a friend, culminating in a highly curated, deeply personal "stash of greatness" organized meticulously on a hard drive. Lex describes the genuine heartbreak of finally throwing away that hard-earned digital archive to completely switch to Spotify, forcing him to reconstruct his musical identity from scratch through streaming playlists.

> "It was heartbreaking 'cause so much love and effort went into that."

[02:10:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=7803s) Algorithmic Music Discovery and the Loss of Album Listening

The shift from physically organizing CDs and digital MP3s to streaming music on Spotify and Pandora completely transformed how people consume audio. While the old way of maintaining a personal "stash" of music felt like heavy lifting, streaming offered an effortless alternative that drastically expanded horizons, opening doors to countless new artists. One distinct advantage of Spotify is its transparent display of play counts. Seeing that a specific song has accumulated a billion streams serves as a legitimate signal of a massive, culture-defining hit.

However, streaming platforms are not without severe drawbacks. A major downside is how corporations pay their artists, especially now that podcast distributions have been lumped into the music streaming pool, diluting the payout cuts. Additionally, the reliance on automated recommendation engines can easily backfire. Rather than genuinely expanding a user's musical palate, algorithms frequently pigeonhole listeners into the exact same predictable sub-genres over and over. This stands in stark contrast to the old days of terrestrial radio, where human program directors possessed the creative freedom to spin records they genuinely loved, exposing listeners to an odd or entirely fresh Soundgarden record out of nowhere.

``` ┌─────────────────────────┐ │ Music Streaming Era │ └────────────┬────────────┘ │ ┌───────────────────────┴───────────────────────┐ ▼ ▼ ┌───────────────────────┐ ┌───────────────────────┐ │ Benefits │ │ Drawbacks │ ├───────────────────────┤ ├───────────────────────┤ │ • Effortless discovery│ │ • Diluted artist cuts │ │ • High-vibrancy tech │ │ • Genre pigeonholing │ │ • Clear play counts │ │ • Loss of full albums │ └───────────────────────┘ └───────────────────────┘ ```

The conversational dynamic shifts to an admissions of guilt regarding personal workout playlists. There is a humorous vulnerability in admitting to using "Rage Against the Machine radio" for lifting motivation—dismissing classical music as an option because intense workouts demand pure energy. Spotify's radio function operates remarkably well in this specific context, populating playlists with akin, high-octane tracks that generate an ongoing stream of awesome recommendations. Even so, despite this vibrant modern convenience, a critical emotional element of music culture has vanished. The collective nostalgia of simply driving in a car and listening to a classic Led Zeppelin record all the way through, from start to finish, is largely dead in the contemporary streaming environment.

* **Spotify Play Counts:** Serves as an undeniable indicator of a track's real-world popularity and massive hit status when hitting milestone numbers. * **Pandora Platform:** Prioritizes discovery and broad musical exposure heavily over structural playlist organization. * **Radio Program Directors:** Acted as cultural gatekeepers who spun tracks purely out of personal taste, introducing a level of randomness missing from modern feeds.

---

[02:13:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=7990s) Archival WAV Files and Digital Audio Workstations

The discussion shifts to physical archives, specifically old personal iTunes libraries dating all the way back to 2005. These archives contain raw CD rips uploaded over two decades ago. When broadcasting interviews, using uncompressed, original WAV files instead of modern streaming tracks yields an immediately noticeable difference. Listeners frequently comment on how incredibly rich a song sounds during these sessions. When playing tracks engineered by iconic mixing legends like Andy Wallace, the sonic clarity is dual-pronged: it highlights a legendary mix, but it is also a direct byproduct of using pristine, original source files. This bypasses the highly processed master files found on modern streaming platforms, which routinely compress audio and artificially amplify the top end.

``` Original CD Rips (2005 iTunes Library) ──► Raw WAV Files ──► Full Dynamic Range (High Clarity) Modern Streaming Platforms ──► Compressed ──► Artificially Boosted Top End ```

A peek behind the curtain reveals a precise Mac-only production ecosystem. The professional workflow centers heavily around Avid Pro Tools as the anchor, alongside secondary usage of Apple Logic and Ableton Live. The hardware and software integration on macOS is unparalleled, providing a smooth ecosystem for both audio processing and video editing. This loyalty to the hardware stems back to a pivotal career moment when a major label deal under Universal Music Group (UMG) provided a transformative kit: an Apple Macintosh G3 computer, a Shure SM7 microphone, and a Digidesign Digi 001—the very first accessible, prosumer Pro Tools interface. Learning to manipulate audio on that specific setup served as the exact gateway required to master video editing and evolve into a full-fledged record producer.

* **Andy Wallace:** Legendary mixing engineer whose historical music catalog sounds significantly superior when played via uncompressed legacy digital formats. * **The Mac G3 Kit:** The foundational UMG-funded gear package that sparked a lifelong transition into digital production and engineering. * **Industry Standard DAW:** Pro Tools remains the undisputed benchmark for high-level commercial recording, even when producers cross-train in competitive software.

---

[02:15:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=8127s) The Learning Curve of DAWs and the Illusion of Simplicity

Navigating high-end digital audio workstations can frequently induce a feeling of being a total "caveman," particularly when operating complex platforms like Ableton Live. For users who only scratch the surface of Ableton's capabilities, it feels as though they are utilizing a mere 1% of the tool's latent power—treating an incredibly complex suite like a basic tape deck by just hitting the record button. The software is fundamentally engineered as an absolute powerhouse for live performances, intricate MIDI looping, and trigger-pad beat creation. Because of this dense feature set, alternative programs like PreSonus Studio One or Cockos REAPER often feel far more intuitive and accessible for standard linear multi-track recording.

> "Any DAW that you get used to... you have to become a master at the things. If you wanna be a recording engineer or producer, you become an expert."

Ultimately, the specific software brand matters far less than the outright dedication to mastering the workflow. Top-tier industry professionals find immense success using wildly different systems. For example, chart-topping producers like Finneas and Billie Eilish rely almost exclusively on Apple Logic to craft their signature records. Operating at an expert level means being fluent enough to fire up multiple DAWs interchangeably depending on the task at hand, even if Pro Tools feels the most inherently like home.

---

[02:17:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=8225s) Amp Simulators vs. A 100-Amplifier Real-World Hoard

Digital emulation has come an incredibly long way, to the point where top producers readily embrace modern amp modeling technology. While traveling on the road with a laptop, using advanced software like Neural DSP plugins, a physical Kemper Profiler, a Line 6 Helix, or a Fractal Audio Axe-Fx provides elite, studio-quality tones on the go. There is a deep personal connection to this tech, highlighted by a recent visit to the Neural DSP headquarters in Helsinki, Finland, to shoot a video with their CEO, Doug Castro. Even guitar icons like John Mayer have fully embraced this digital leap, collaborating with developers to model their personal boutique amplifier rigs down to the exact circuit behaviors.

``` ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ The 100-Amplifier Arsenal │ └───────────────────────────┬────────────────────────────┘ │ ┌─────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────┐ ▼ ▼ ▼ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Marshall JCM800 │ │ Mesa Boogie │ │ Vox AC30 │ ├─────────────────┤ ├─────────────────┤ ├─────────────────┤ │ Modified mids; │ │ Scooped, heavy │ │ Bright, chimey │ │ punchy rock │ │ metal sounds │ │ British pop │ │ textures │ │ (i.e., Metallica│ │ textures │ └─────────────────┘ └─────────────────┘ └─────────────────┘ ```

Despite the convenience of digital plugins, nothing quite compares to the absolute jaw-dropping reality of a historic physical archive: owning roughly 100 real-world, physical guitar amplifiers. Amassing a massive collection of 95 to 100 rare amplifiers is the byproduct of turning 64 years old and refusing to ever let go of a single piece of gear. This level of hoarding is driven by a quest for distinct tonal variety. Every single amplifier in the studio does exactly one specific thing perfectly:

* **Modified Marshall JCM800:** Kept around strictly for its punchy, mid-range driven rock textures. * **Mesa Boogie:** Utilized explicitly for heavy, scooped metal tones reminiscent of Metallica or Dream Theater. * **Vox AC30:** Deployed for bright, chimey British pop textures akin to Brian May of Queen or The Edge of U2.

---

[02:19:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=8355s) Guitar Philosophy, Love at First Sight, and Nashville Tuning

An amusing philosophical disagreement arises over guitar ownership, with a humorous claim that owning multiple guitars is flat-out "cheating." While a purist might try to commit to a single American Fender Stratocaster as their absolute soulmate, resisting the urge to collect instruments is incredibly difficult. This is illustrated by a story of walking into a local Cambridge guitar shop just to absorb the creative aura of the room, only to experience genuine love at first sight. Spotting a striking, silver-shaded American Stratocaster on the wall triggered an instant, profound emotional bond that defies standard logic.

``` ┌────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ The Guitar Collection │ └───────────────────┬────────────────────┘ │ ┌──────────────────────────┴──────────────────────────┐ ▼ ▼ ┌─────────────────────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────────────────┐ │ Electrics │ │ Acoustics │ ├─────────────────────────────────┤ ├─────────────────────────────────┤ │ • Vintage Gibsons │ │ • 1957 Gibson Country Western │ │ • Fender Stratocasters │ │ • Gibson J-45 │ │ • PRS Guitars │ │ • Martin D-28 │ │ • Signature Double Cut Les Paul │ │ • Guild 12-String │ │ Special (with P-90 pickups) │ │ • Guild Nashville-Tuned 6-String│ └─────────────────────────────────┘ └─────────────────────────────────┘ ```

When evaluating acoustic instruments, the choice of which guitar to pull off the rack is dictated entirely by tone rather than physical playability, as every high-end instrument should be meticulously set up to feel like absolute "butter." A 1957 Gibson Country Western acoustic—cherished in a personal collection for over 30 years—delivers a tight, incredibly balanced mid-range without any booming low-end bass response, making it perfect for specific recording tracks. For deep, resonant body textures, a Gibson J-45 or a classic Martin D-28 offers completely different sonic flavors.

* **Nashville Tuning Explained:** A distinct string configuration on a standard six-string guitar where the lower strings (E, A, D, and G) are replaced with lighter strings tuned a full octave higher. * **David Gilmour's Variant:** The legendary Pink Floyd guitarist famously utilized a specialized Nashville tuning—featuring a low E string raised a full two octaves—to compose the iconic chorus of "Comfortably Numb." * **The Signature Axe:** A custom-designed signature Gibson Double Cut Les Paul Special equipped with vintage-voiced P-90 pickups.

---

[02:23:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=8620s) Craft Mastery vs. The Empty Pursuit of Viral Fame

The conversation shifts toward career longevity and unexpected mid-life success. Launching a YouTube channel in one's mid-50s and watching it explode into an international phenomenon provides a unique perspective on life. The underlying life philosophy is encouragingly simple: "Somebody's gotta be successful, so why can't it be you?" The channel itself was birthed completely by accident following a viral video featuring Bob Dylan's son, Jakob Dylan. The video triggered a massive influx of messages from world-renowned professional musicians and prestigious global music conservatories all asking for deep-dive tutorials on ear training and relative pitch. The channel was launched six months later primarily as a pragmatic way to scale communication and stop answering thousands of identical emails one by one.

``` ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ The Viral Growth Trajectory │ └───────────────────────────┬────────────────────────────┘ │ ┌─────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────┐ ▼ ▼ ▼ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Month 1 │ │ Year 1 │ │ Month 18 │ ├─────────────────┤ ├─────────────────┤ ├─────────────────┤ │ 4,000 │──══► │ 100,000 │──══► │ 300,000 │ │ Subscribers │ │ Subscribers │ │ Subscribers │ └─────────────────┘ └─────────────────┘ └─────────────────┘ ```

This organically explosive growth highlights a massive cultural disconnect in how younger generations view modern social media platforms like TikTok and Instagram. Many creators blindly optimize for superficial metrics, chasing views, clicks, and immediate fame. This approach is fundamentally hollow. True fulfillment comes from spending decades out of the public eye pursuing the absolute mastery of a craft. Getting exceptionally good at one specific thing offline builds a crucial blueprint for excellence. Even if that original skill isn't the exact thing that eventually makes you famous, the discipline of mastery carries over, training you exactly how to get better at the next thing, and the next thing after that. Chasing virality for its own sake is short-lived and unfulfilling.

There is an ultimate irony in transitioning from a strictly behind-the-scenes industry professional to a prominent public figure. From 1999 up until late 2015, a strict personal rule banned cameras from the studio entirely. No photos were ever allowed with the musical artists or bands being produced, leaving absolutely zero footprint on the internet for over 15 years. Operating purely as a behind-the-scenes force makes a late-career pivot into becoming the on-camera "talent" and public face of a major educational brand an incredible twist of fate.

* **Subscribership Milestones:** The channel gained 4,000 subscribers in its opening month, crossed 100,000 within the first year, and rapidly scaled to 300,000 subscribers just nine months later. * **Content Strategy:** Based entirely on creating deep-dive videos regarding personal, authentic technical interests rather than pandering to perceived internet demographics. * **The "White-Haired Guy" Myth:** Dismantled the common misconception that internet audiences would refuse to watch educational music theory content hosted by an older creator.

[02:28:16](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=8896s) The Art of Reinvention and Content Creation

The conversation touches on how modern creators often chase fame first, skipping the vital foundation of developing a real skill. Looking back at his own sprawling trajectory, Rick outlines his extensive educational and professional background. He holds an undergraduate degree in classical bass, a master’s degree from the New England Conservatory in jazz guitar, and spent five years from 1987 to 1992 teaching jazz studies at the college level. In 1992, he secured his first publishing deal with PolyGram Publishing. Later, at age 37, he transitioned into becoming a music producer. Despite having no formal training in engineering, he completely taught himself the trade.

This spirit of relentless self-education followed him into the digital age. When he transitioned to YouTube, he taught himself how to edit videos, how to conduct interviews, and how to conquer YouTube Shorts, which both speakers agree is a "totally different skill" from long-form content. He occupies a unique dual identity as both a traditional musician and a "YouTuber"—a title that demands meticulous attention to platform metrics like custom thumbnails, which Rick insists on making himself. Lex steps in to thank Rick on behalf of the entire internet for his signature presentation style, praising how he cuts straight to the core of a topic rather than cluttering a five-minute video with a 30-minute introduction. Rick attributes this efficiency directly to his musical production background, equating it to "cutting the fluff" to make a cohesive song.

- **1987–1992:** Taught jazz studies at the college level for five years. - **1992:** Secured his first music publishing deal with PolyGram Publishing. - **Age 37:** Became a music producer and taught himself audio engineering from scratch.

---

[02:30:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=9006s) The Vital Role of Friendships and Music

Lex pivots the discussion to a quote he previously heard Rick say: "never waste a friendship." Rick elaborates passionately, stating that maintaining human connections and valuing the time spent with loved ones is "pretty much everything in life." He shares the intimate detail that he talks to each of his siblings multiple times a week, chatting with his two sisters almost every single night. He actively keeps in touch with and visits childhood friends, college friends from both institutions he attended, and peers from every distinct era of his life. Lex notes that Rick must have encountered some incredibly weird, interesting, and beautiful human beings over the decades, making the hard work of connecting and reconnecting deeply rewarding.

When Lex asks about the fundamental role of music in the human experience, Rick summarizes it as a tool "to enlighten people and to create the soundtrack of their life." Lex resonates deeply with this, describing how listening to a song when he is entirely alone can make him truly feel alive, channeling heavy emotions like sadness, hope, or raw excitement. Lex shares personal anecdotes of pacing around his room while getting "hyped" to a Metallica set played in Moscow, or channeling a spirit of protest while working out to Rage Against the Machine. Both speakers marvel at the mystery of the human psyche that allows vibrating strings, harmonies, and melodies to reverberate across generations. Rick concludes that creating music is simply "one of the greatest things that humans ever did."

---

[02:32:31](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=9151s) A Farewell and a Quote from Nietzsche

As the interview draws to a close, Lex jokes that the entire trajectory—from humanity inventing instruments to Rick reaching millions of people on the internet—is proof that "this is all a simulation." Lex expresses profound personal gratitude, stating it is crazy to finally meet Rick after being a longtime fan. He thanks Rick for celebrating music and helping the world discover and rediscover iconic musicians and songs across decades and centuries. Rick warmly accepts the praise, noting the feeling is mutual.

Lex delivers his standard outro, inviting listeners to support the podcast by checking out the sponsors in the description, and directing them to links where they can submit feedback or ask questions. True to his signature style, Lex leaves the audience with a philosophical parting thought, invoking a classic quote from Friedrich Nietzsche: "Without music, life would be a mistake."

## Notable quotes > [38:35](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=2315s) the greatest innovator in the history of jazz — Rick Beato

> [38:35](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=2315s) toes hanging over the cliff — Lex Fridman

> [41:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=2469s) Thought is the enemy of flow. — Vinnie Colaiuta

> [43:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=2634s) Whatever you play in the bass kinda defines what kind of chord it is — Rick Beato

> [59:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=3549s) you hear the tone of the voice backwards, forwards, it doesn't matter. You know who it is. — Rick Beato

> [01:09:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=4153s) Life is very short, and there's no time / For fussing and fighting, my friend. — John Lennon

> [01:28:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=5326s) I miss the comfort of being sad. — Kurt Cobain

> [01:28:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=5326s) Someday you'll have a beautiful life. You know, someday you'll be a star in somebody else's sky. Why, why, why can't it be mine? — Pearl Jam

> [02:16:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=8160s) Any DAW that you get used to... you have to become a master at the things. If you wanna be a recording engineer or producer, you become an expert. — Rick Beato

> [02:30:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=9006s) never waste a friendship — Rick Beato

> [02:30:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=9006s) to enlighten people and to create the soundtrack of their life — Rick Beato

> [02:30:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=9006s) one of the greatest things that humans ever did — Rick Beato

> [02:32:31](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=9151s) this is all a simulation — Lex Fridman

> [02:32:31](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58&t=9151s) Without music, life would be a mistake. — Friedrich Nietzsche

## Mentioned Joe Pass, Flea, Red Hot Chili Peppers, Miles Davis, Charlie Parker, Birth of the Cool, Bitches Brew, John Coltrane, Paul Chambers, Philly Joe Jones, Wynton Kelly, Herbie Hancock, Ron Carter, Tony Williams, Wayne Shorter, Vinnie Colaiuta, David Gilmour, John Beato, Yngwie Malmsteen, Comfortably Numb, Pink Floyd, Jimi Hendrix, Kid Charlemagne, Steely Dan, Larry Carlton, Randy Rhoads, Stairway to Heaven, Led Zeppelin, Hey, Joe, Stone in Love, Journey, Neal Schon, Brother to Brother, Gino Vannelli, Carlos Rios, Mr. Crowley, Ozzy Osbourne, Sultans of Swing, Dire Straits, Mark Knopfler, Phil, Binson Echorec, Hiwatt, Zoom 9030, Pro Tools, Ice Cream Man, Van Halen, Nancy Wilson, Heart, Dweezil Zappa, Phil X, Lex Fridman, Brothers in Arms, Romeo and Juliet, Money for Nothing, Carlos Santana, Europa, B.B. King, Brian May, Adele, Nirvana, Stevie Ray Vaughan, Eric Clapton, UPLIFT Desk, BetterHelp, LMNT, Fin, Shopify, Perplexity, Tears in Heaven, Wonderful Tonight, Pattie Boyd, George Harrison, Layla, Something, Rick Rubin, Daniel Lanois, Brendan O'Brien, Butch Vig, Johnny Cash, Tom Petty, Ken Scott, Abbey Road Studios, A Hard Day's Night, The Beatles, I Am the Walrus, Bohemian Rhapsody, Queen, Freddie Mercury, In the Air Tonight, Phil Collins, Sting, We Can Work It Out, Paul McCartney, John Lennon, Help!, Rubber Soul, Revolver, George Martin, Bach, Beethoven, Mozart, Ninth Symphony, 27 Club, Brian Jones, Jim Morrison, Janis Joplin, Amy Winehouse, Kurt Cobain, Peter Jackson, The Get Back, MTV Unplugged, Dylan Beato, Nat King Cole, Frank Sinatra, Elton John, Jump, Little Children, Bernie Taupin, Tiny Dancer, Metallica, Kirk Hammett, James Hetfield, Apple, Hans Zimmer, God Only Knows, The Beach Boys, Peter Frampton, A Whiter Shade of Pale, Leonard Cohen, Hallelujah, Tom Waits, Martha, Billy Corgan, Smashing Pumpkins, Bruce Springsteen, Louis C.K., In Utero, Frances Farmer Will Have Her Revenge on Seattle, Pearl Jam, Black, Ten, Robert Plant, Steven Tyler, Roger Daltrey, AC/DC, Pantera, Moscow, The Black Album, Enter Sandman, Creeping Death, Harvester of Sorrow, Fade to Black, Sad but True, Master of Puppets, Seek and Destroy, For Whom the Bell Tolls, One, Whiplash, Immortal Beloved, Gary Oldman, Ode to Joy, Johann Sebastian Bach, Dominic Miller, Eisenach, Leipzig, The Well-Tempered Clavier, Felix Mendelssohn, St. Matthew Passion, Berlin, Alice in Chains, Tool, Suno, Udio, ElevenLabs Music, 50 Cent, Many Men, Eli Mercer, Sadie Winters, Walking Away, CBS News, Neon Ghosts, NPR, ChatGPT, Claude, Ed Sheeran, Drake, Rick Beato, TikTok, Photoshop, iZotope RX, Sabrina Carpenter, Manchild, Jack Antonoff, Amy Allen, Doechii, Gotye, Luiz Bonfá, Bruno Mars, Michael Jackson, Billie Eilish, Finneas, Taylor Swift, WMG, UMG, Guns N' Roses, Fleetwood Mac, Ocean Spray, Dreams, Spotify, Pandora, Soundgarden, Rage Against the Machine, iTunes, Andy Wallace, Avid Pro Tools, Apple Logic, Ableton Live, macOS, Universal Music Group, Apple Macintosh G3, Shure SM7, Digidesign Digi 001, PreSonus Studio One, Cockos REAPER, Neural DSP, Kemper Profiler, Line 6 Helix, Fractal Audio Axe-Fx, Doug Castro, Helsinki, Finland, John Mayer, Marshall JCM800, Mesa Boogie, Dream Theater, Vox AC30, The Edge, U2, Fender Stratocaster, Cambridge, 1957 Gibson Country Western, Gibson J-45, Martin D-28, Guild 12-String, Guild Nashville-Tuned 6-String, Gibson Double Cut Les Paul Special, Bob Dylan, Jakob Dylan, Instagram, YouTube, YouTube Shorts, New England Conservatory, PolyGram Publishing, Friedrich Nietzsche

[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SJiTwbSI58)

中文简报

Rick Beato对抗科技巨头,捍卫音乐“合理使用” 音乐行业对自动化 Content ID 系统的极度依赖使艺术沦为商品,并惩罚了教育类创作者;但内容创作者可以通过积极提出法律争议来证明合理使用,从而成功推翻数千起企业收益索赔。 在这场内容广泛的对话中,Lex Fridman 与 Rick Beato 深入探讨了音乐的历史、演进与未来,重点分析了 Miles Davis、Mark Knopfler 以及 Johann Sebastian Bach 等标志性艺术家。他们剖析了传奇摇滚吉他独奏的结构、经典曲目中不完美之处的妙用,以及传奇人物独特的歌曲创作历程。讨论还直面当代行业所面临的挑战,包括 AI 生成音乐的兴起及其创作局限性、Spotify 等流媒体平台上艺术的商品化,以及 Beato 与 YouTube 版权系统长久以来的抗争。 Joe Pass 复杂的爵士乐段落完全依靠即兴演奏,他运用精巧的和弦转位与单音编排而非简化方案,Beato 当年通过反复拨动黑胶唱针纯靠听音还原了其细节。 (36:49) Miles Davis 被视为爵士乐史上最伟大的革新者,从酷派爵士(cool jazz)、调式爵士(modal jazz)到爵士融合(jazz fusion),他几乎引领了爵士乐所有重要的风格演变。 (38:35) 20世纪60年代的 Miles Davis 五重奏贯彻不排练、录后不回听的录音理念,实践“思考是心流之敌”的信条,将自发的音乐直觉与现场创作风险置于首位。 (41:09) 贝斯在乐队中掌控着决定性的和声力量,贝斯手所选取的低音直接奠定并定义了整体和弦的性质,是维系全队最核心的乐器。 (43:54)

Reading summary

Music educator and producer Rick Beato argues that enduring musical resonance depends on deeply internalized ear training, physical mastery of an instrument, and instinctual flow. In dialogue with Lex Fridman, he contrasts human-centered craft with modern streaming commodification and artificial intelligence. Ear Training and Pitch Acquisition (8:53) Beato theorizes that all infants are born with the capacity for perfect pitch as flexible listeners, referencing developmental research by Patricia Kuhl on phonetic recognition before nine months of age. He cites his son Dylan's early musical fluency—recognizing complex film themes like Star Wars and Superman at exact frequencies before knowing note names—as evidence of early, high-information acoustic stimulation. However, Beato emphasizes that relative pitch, which measures the relationship between notes and intervals, remains far more practical for working musicians than absolute pitch. Mechanics and Consistency in Guitar Practice (18:53) Developing proficiency on guitar involves mastering subconscious micro-adjustments, such as precisely angling fingers during string bends to mute adjacent strings and prevent sympathetic resonance. Beato advises beginners to focus on open chords and real songs rather than dry music theory to cultivate initial passion during the first two to three months. To sustain technical growth, he advocates for regular, short practice intervals—specifically noting that practicing 10 minutes a day every day is far more productive than cramming an hour of practice into a single day. Creative Flow, Improvisation, and Aging (41:09) Highlighting jazz icons like Miles Davis, Beato underscores drummer Vinnie Colaiuta's maxim that "thought is the enemy of flow." Bassist Ron Carter recounted to Beato that Davis's 1960s quintet never rehearsed and rarely reviewed recordings, choosing unfiltered performance over premeditated structure. Beato connects stylistic agility to cognitive development: fluid intelligence drives spontaneous rock and pop innovation in a musician's twenties, whereas crystallized intelligence allows classical composers like Ludwig van Beethoven to construct intricate masterpieces—such as the Ninth Symphony—later in life despite total deafness. Streaming Commodification and the AI Era (105:28) Both speakers critique how the streaming ecosystem has turned music into an infinite, frictionless commodity, contrasting the loss of curated physical archives with compressed streaming audio and algorithmic feeds that narrow listener exposure. Addressing emerging text-to-audio generative models like Suno and Udio, Beato and Fridman contend that while machine learning excels at micro-level studio tasks like audio restoration, full generative outputs create derivative material devoid of human suffering and soul. They anticipate that the influx of automated content will prompt a cultural renewal centered on raw authenticity and live instrumentation. While digital emulators, algorithmic platforms, and generative software make music production and discovery universally accessible, Beato contends they cannot duplicate the personal grit of ear training, manual physical expression, and live collaborative instincts that define historic recordings.

精炼阅读摘要

音乐制作人兼教育家 Rick Beato 与主持人 Lex Fridman 在对话中指出,真正的音乐造诣源于扎实的听音训练、长期的身体机能微调以及不可替代的人类情感表达,而当前的生成式 AI 与流媒体算法正在深刻重塑音乐的创作与消费生态。 听力养成与身体机能的微调法则 (8:53) Beato 结合自身从 14 岁扒带 Jimi Hendrix 的《Hey Joe》以及后来的爵士大师 Joe Pass 的经历指出,听力训练是音乐理解的根基。针对听力习得,Beato 提出婴儿初生时可能普遍具备绝对音高能力,但在九个月左右因语言环境定向而逐渐减退;他的儿子 Dylan 便是通过孕期与婴儿期高信息量音乐的刺激,在幼儿阶段建立了绝对音高认知。但在职业演奏层面,Beato 强调相对音高远比绝对音高更实用,因为音乐本质上是由音程构建的动态关系。在乐器演奏的生理层面,吉他初学者的主要门槛在于生理适应与下意识的微调机制。无论是保持手指弯曲不闷死邻近琴弦,还是在弹奏 Pink Floyd《Comfortably Numb》推弦时用食指角度静音杂音,这些细微的身体调整在日积月累后都会转化为潜意识本能。Beato 提出,每天坚持 10 分钟的高频练习,其效果远胜于单日集中苦练一小时。 即兴哲学与青年创造力的高峰 (41:09) 对话探讨了爵士乐对现代摇滚与现代音乐制作的深层影响。Beato 强调 Miles Davis 是爵士乐史上的革新核心,从比博普跨越至冷爵士、调式爵士与融合爵士。贝斯手 Ron Carter 透露,Davis 的五重奏在录音室录音时从不排练,乐手看谱后直接演奏且事后从不回听母带;鼓手 Vinnie Colaiuta 亦将此总结为“思考是心流之敌”。摇滚乐队如 Metallica 虽以精密刚猛的下拨技术闻名,但吉他手 Kirk Hammett 的独奏构想同样植根于即兴 Jam 灵感。在创作心理学方面,Beato 提出音乐人的突破性创意往往出现在 30 岁之前,这对应着产生全新想法的流体智力在青年时期的巅峰;相比之下,巴赫或贝多芬在晚年创作出第九交响曲等宏篇巨作,则依托于沉淀一生的晶体智力。此外,Sting 等艺术家所指出的“现代歌曲中 Bridge(桥段)的消失”,反映了流行乐在结构反思与动态张力上的流失。 AI生成潮下的真实性与算法挑战 (105:28) 面对 Suno、Udio 等文本生成音乐 AI 的爆发,Beato 认为公众无需过度恐慌。他指出,AI 的直接受益者其实是具备卓越鉴赏力的成熟词曲作者,他们能从海量片段中筛选出优质灵感。Lex Fridman 观察到大众对缺乏灵魂的“AI 垃圾内容”已经产生天然辨识力,在布鲁斯或灵魂乐等承载人类苦难叙事的流派中,观众无法接受由机器捏造的情感。Beato 明确拒绝将 AI 用于个人创作,认为拼接算法模块的过程毫无乐趣;目前机器学习工具的合理价值仍局限于 iZotope RX 音频修复降噪或微观编辑。与此同时,流媒体平台与内容平台对现代音乐生态带来双重挤压:一方面,YouTube 严苛的 Content ID 系统让解析音乐的教育类视频面临 100% 收益被唱片巨头剥夺的困境;另一方面,Spotify 等算法推荐将音乐变为廉价的公用设施,打破了传统黑胶与 CD 时代的深度专辑聆听习惯,并使受众陷入单一曲风的信息茧房。 本期节目深入探讨了从古典乐理、爵士即兴到数字时代生产机制的演变历程,指明尽管流媒体降维了音乐的稀缺性、AI 充斥着合成内容,但现场演奏的瑕疵美感、人际间的情感共鸣与人类对抗生理极限的即兴心流,依然是音乐不可替代的核心价值。

Source quotes

[38:35] Rick Beato: the greatest innovator in the history of jazz [38:35] Lex Fridman: toes hanging over the cliff [41:09] Vinnie Colaiuta: Thought is the enemy of flow. [43:54] Rick Beato: Whatever you play in the bass kinda defines what kind of chord it is [59:09] Rick Beato: you hear the tone of the voice backwards, forwards, it doesn't matter. You know who it is. [69:13] John Lennon: Life is very short, and there's no time / For fussing and fighting, my friend. [88:46] Kurt Cobain: I miss the comfort of being sad. [88:46] Pearl Jam: Someday you'll have a beautiful life. You know, someday you'll be a star in somebody else's sky. Why, why, why can't it be mine? [136:00] Rick Beato: Any DAW that you get used to... you have to become a master at the things. If you wanna be a recording engineer or producer, you become an expert. [150:06] Rick Beato: never waste a friendship [150:06] Rick Beato: to enlighten people and to create the soundtrack of their life [150:06] Rick Beato: one of the greatest things that humans ever did [152:31] Lex Fridman: this is all a simulation [152:31] Friedrich Nietzsche: Without music, life would be a mistake.

Original transcript

[0:00] - The following is a conversation with Rick Beato, legendary [0:03] music educator, interviewer, producer, songwriter, and a true [0:07] multi-instrument musician, playing guitar, bass, cello, and piano. Rick, with his [0:14] incredible YouTube channel, celebrates great musicians and [0:18] musical ideas, and helps millions of people, including [0:22] me, fall in love with great music all over [0:26] again. This is the Lex Fridman Podcast. To support [0:30] it, please check out our sponsors in the description, where you can [0:34] also find links to contact me, ask questions, give [0:37] feedback, and so on. And now, dear friends, here's Rick Beato. You had, I [0:45] think, an incredibly fun and diverse beginning to your music [0:49] journey. I heard somewhere that one of the things that made you fall in love [0:53] with music was listening to guitar solos, some epic guitar solos. [0:57] What's an early guitar solo that you remember you connected to spiritually, [1:04] musically, where you're like, "Wow, there's magic in this"? [1:07] - Well, the first solo that I learned was "Hey Joe." It was actually a good [1:11] beginner song, you know, when I first started playing the [1:14] guitar, because it has pretty simple chords, right? So it's like E, C, G, D, A. [1:22] And I learned the solo, and I figured out this, like, I'll say it's this [1:26] pentatonic scale, E minor pentatonic scale though. I didn't know that's what it was called, but [1:30] learned this thing, and it's like, "Whoa, he's just in this one shape [1:34] here." Now, there was no... You couldn't go look anything up. You [1:37] just, if you could figure out the notes, you noticed that there was a little pattern [1:41] to it. And then I got so obsessed with it, and I showed [1:46] my younger brother John, who started playing guitar right at the same time I did. [1:50] So I was 14, he was 11. And I [1:54] would play rhythm for him for five minutes while he would solo over [1:57] Hey Joe. And then as soon as I'd start soloing, he'd throw the guitar down, then we'd get in a [2:01] fight. And so my mom eventually was like, "What is going on here?" And I was [2:06] like, "John won't play rhythm." [2:11] "John won't play rhythm for me." She's like, "Okay, I'll play rhythm for you. [2:14] What, what are the chords?" And— [2:17] - That's awesome. [2:17] - ... I was like, "Okay, it's like E, C, G, D, A." [2:20] And so my mom would literally play rhythm for 20 minutes while I'd play. [2:25] - Hashtag parenting. [2:27] - That's amazing. When I look back on it now, my mom's been gone for 10 [2:31] years now. When I look back on it, it's like, "My God, my parents were so cool." [2:36] - We should mention that "Hey Joe," and Hendrix in general, is kind of known [2:39] for the rhythm not being simple rhythm, just the chords that you mentioned. [2:43] It's what you do with those chords. It's almost improvisation, the rhythm side. [2:47] - He did all those really cool chord fragments, riffs, and things like that, [2:51] that's just part of his... That's the Hendrix style. [2:54] - What do you think? I mean, many people put Hendrix as the greatest guitarist of all time. [2:58] What do you think is part of that? [3:00] - You know, I make lists. [3:02] - You do. If you somehow don't know who Rick Beato is, [3:06] go on YouTube right now and watch your excellent [3:10] interviews with musicians, watch your breakdown analysis of different songs, [3:16] and watch your top 20 lists, where you're [3:19] very opinionated, sometimes very openly critical about certain [3:23] kinds of songs. It's fun. Opinions are fun. [3:27] - But they do change, Lex, from day to day. [3:30] - Yeah, exactly. [3:31] - You know, like I... But when, anytime I do a list, if I do 20, I like to do [3:35] 20 because that gives me some leeway to throw in. I have to throw in [3:39] something that is so weird that people, you [3:42] know... So, something that a lot of people won't know, [3:46] just to have it on there, so I can at least introduce a per- you know, [3:49] I'll put somebody like a- Allan Holdsworth, who's a famous fusion guitar [3:53] player. I'll throw in one of his solos or something. Just some, some [3:57] oddball solo in there, just so that people, as they're listening down the list, will get [4:01] exposed to something they would not necessarily get exposed to. [4:05] - Yeah, a lot of variety. But Hendrix... Did you show up here today, Rick, [4:12] try to tell me that Hendrix is not up there? I just am getting that vibe right now. [4:16] - No, I'm not. I, but I don't want to say greatest, you [4:19] know... You, you can say, well, there, there are people that inspired Jimi Hendrix. [4:26] Charlie Christian, older guitar players. Charlie Christian, Django Reinhardt [4:30] were the first two really big, and probably, and Andrés [4:34] Segovia were, were three of the giants of the [4:38] 20th century, as far as guitar influences for most of the [4:41] players that were to follow. [4:43] - So here, going to Perplexity, Django Reinhardt was, of course, a jazz guitarist [4:47] and composer, active mainly in France, and is widely regarded as one of the [4:50] greatest guitarists in jazz history. [4:54] - So, Django was... Well, there's a huge movement [4:58] right now, Gypsy Jazz Movement, as they call it- [5:01] ... that is kind of built around this style of [5:05] music that he played back in the early 20th century. One of the things [5:09] about Django is that he was in a fire, [5:13] and he had two of his third and fourth finger, so [5:17] his ring finger and pinky were essentially melted together. He had [5:22] no use of them. Although he could use them while he was chording, but a lot of [5:25] these incredibly fast lines, he's just playing with two fingers. And it's amazing. [5:44] - That... What is that? So that's Gypsy Jazz. [5:48] - That's Gypsy Jazz, yeah. [5:53] Him, Stéphane Grappelli was a violinist that played with him a lot. [5:58] - How much of this is improvisation? [6:01] - Everything he's doing there is improvised. [6:07] - It feels so free. And fun like swing, and then at least you said [6:15] pre-bebop. So bebop was a kind of jazz that was also influential [6:19] on you in your own life journey. And it's this [6:23] complicated, legendary kind of jazz that was very influential on the music that [6:27] followed. So what was bebop? [6:29] - Well, after the big bands were happening in [6:32] the, you know, from the '20s through the '40s, [6:37] Small, people would go out and play in small groups that they [6:41] would tour with. And Charlie Parker, who's really kind of the, one of the [6:45] main figures of early bebop, really developed the language of [6:49] it. Usually, the music that they're playing over are standard chord progressions- [6:54] ... that they would use as vehicles to improvise [6:57] over. A lot of them were AA, BA form. And Charlie Parker [7:03] created this language of improvisation that [7:07] was far more sophisticated than the swing players [7:11] of the big band era. You know, think of people like Benny [7:15] Goodman of that era. They would have really fast tempo [7:19] songs, angular lines, chromaticism, things like that, chromatic notes. [7:24] - Chromatic notes are just notes next to each other on- [7:27] - Next to each other, yeah [7:27] - ... on the keyboard. [7:28] - I like to think of it as connecting notes. [7:30] - Connecting. You're putting in more notes than are supposed to be there and so [7:33] doing, creating some interesting texture. [7:36] - Yeah, so that is one of the most difficult [7:40] styles to master, because all these things are a language. [7:44] Blues playing, they're all just languages, right? It's like, just like you'd learn [7:48] any type of language. My dad loved [7:52] bebop. Now, when I was a little kid and he's listening to these bebop [7:56] records, whether it's Charlie Parker or Dizzy Gillespie [8:00] or Oscar Peterson, Joe Pass, great jazz guitar [8:04] player, I'm just hearing this stuff. I don't know any different. My dad was not a musician, but for [8:08] some reason, he liked incredibly sophisticated- [8:11] ... music that was very technical. And, [8:17] I just heard it and just was like, "Oh, yeah, okay, cool." And not realizing that [8:23] it was developing my ear, because I really, bebop is one of the hardest [8:29] to improvise in that style, in that language of bebop. It's [8:33] very difficult to do. And hearing it as a kid is one of the things [8:41] that I think enables you, just like languages, enables you to learn it [8:49] as opposed to somebody that's never been exposed to it and tries to learn it as a teenager. [8:53] So I think it's very similar to learning languages, which kinda [8:57] is like my theory on perfect pitch, that every child is born with [9:01] perfect pitch. And they start to lose the ability around nine months- [9:05] ... when people become culturally bound listeners, [9:09] when babies do. They start out as citizens of the [9:13] world, you know? They can, they have the the neural [9:17] pathways to hear the sounds, the phonemes of all 6,500 languages spoken on Earth. [9:23] But then around nine months, they begin to lose that ability and [9:26] they, when they become these culturally bound listeners, there's a [9:30] great YouTube video with this woman, Patricia Kuhl. She's a language researcher. [9:37] And I watched this, The linguistic genius of babies. [9:40] I saw this in 2010, this lecture that she did, like a TED [9:43] Talk, and she talks about this, that kids, they did a, an [9:47] experiment. They exposed kids to Mandarin three times a week for [9:51] 25-minute sessions, just a [9:54] person speaking Mandarin to these babies. And they were able [9:58] to recognize the sounds, the phonemes of that language even later on. [10:05] And when I realized that my son Dylan had perfect [10:09] pitch, I thought, "Why does Dylan have perfect pitch but no one [10:14] in my family had ever had perfect pitch?" And I thought, "Well, it must be [10:18] because of the things I exposed to him [10:22] prenatally and then in the first nine months of his life." [10:25] 'Cause that's the only way I could explain it. [10:27] - We're gonna return to Joe Pass. We gotta go to Dylan. You mentioned Dylan. I guess [10:31] that's in part one of the origin stories of [10:35] you putting out videos into the world, is the early videos you [10:39] did with Dylan, a set of videos on his perfect pitch. And for people who don't [10:42] know, maybe you can speak to what perfect pitch means. [10:45] - It's the ability to identify any note without a reference tone. So you can play, [10:54] it doesn't matter how quickly they are, that a person with perfect pitch [10:58] can hear a note and immediately identify it. Or a collection of notes. [11:03] - And taking a tangent upon a tangent, you also have a course on ear training. [11:06] - Yes, but my course is for relative pitch- [11:08] - Relative pitch [11:08] - ... not to be confused with perfect pitch. [11:10] - Is it fair to say that relative pitch, as far as the thing you would learn, is more [11:14] useful- [11:14] - Yes [11:14] - ... for musicians? [11:15] - Yes. [11:15] - Can you explain the difference between the two? [11:17] - Relative pitch is basically learning how to identify pitches relative to [11:23] a stated tonic or something that you've heard, or just relative [11:27] to each other. If you hear a note and then you hear another note after [11:31] it, you can recognize, let's say, it's a minor third interval. So if you're on [11:35] the note A, the next note would be C. So once you're given a reference note, [11:40] you can use relative pitch to identify the [11:43] relative nature from one pitch to another. [11:46] - And of course, intervals make up scales, and intervals make up chords- [11:51] - Chords, yup. [11:51] - ... and so that if you develop it to any degree [11:57] relative pitch, you can understand, you can hear the music better. [12:01] - Yes. [12:03] - Um, what does it take since we're taking a tangent on a tangent, what's [12:06] what does it take to train your ear? What's a TL;DR [12:10] on the course before people go out and sign up? [12:13] - It's just practice basically. You start with intervals. [12:17] Typically, with small intervals like minor second, major second. So minor second would [12:21] be a half-step, major second would be a whole-step. [12:23] - Are you listening to the tone one after the other or two of them together? [12:26] - Both. So played separately it's called melodic intervals, right, like a melody? [12:31] And harmonic intervals are played like a harmony, together. So you have to be able to [12:35] identify them both, both ways. [12:38] - What's an early journey? Like, we'll give people a preview of what they should... [12:41] Like, what does that look like? What does practice look like? [12:44] - Well, my course, it will play you an interval, and then you [12:48] identify it by clicking on whether it's, you know, a major third, or minor [12:52] third, or major sixth, or minor sixth, or perfect fifth, or tritone, whatever it is. [12:56] And it will teach you gradually, over time, how to recognize all the intervals. [13:02] - So you listen to a melodic interval or a harmonic interval. How quickly [13:09] does the ear in the various age groups that we humans are [13:13] in, how quickly does the ear learn the different [13:17] intervals? Is it a week? Two weeks? A month? Two months? Five years? [13:23] - I think you'd do it pretty quickly. Within, you know, if you practice, within a couple of [13:26] months, you can really make a lot of progress on it, if you practice daily. [13:33] - What benefit does it have to you as a musician in general? [13:36] - Well, it's great if you wanna hear a chord progression if you're trying to figure out a song. [13:40] And you can say, "Oh, that's going from the six minor chord, or the four major, to the [13:44] five major, to the one major." [13:46] And you can just identify it immediately, and then you figure out what the first chord is, then you know what [13:50] the rest of the chords are 'cause they're in relation to whatever [13:54] that first chord is. And for learning solos, for example, [13:58] or learning melodies, being able to sound something out. [14:01] - Now, do you recommend people couple that with music [14:04] theory in terms of education, the education journey? [14:09] - They have to be taught together because these terms are really music theory, right? [14:14] Those intervals, major second, minor second, major third, minor third, perfect [14:18] fourth. So as you're doing that, and then [14:23] you... Once you learn the intervals, the 12 [14:27] intervals in an octave, then you learn 'em both melodically and [14:30] harmonically, so played together and separate. Then you learn [14:34] chords, and so then you learn to identify major, minor, [14:38] diminished, augmented, suspended chords, things like that. Well, you're basically [14:41] learning music theory at the same time with that. 'Cause learning... Music theory [14:45] is just the name of things in music. [14:48] - So there's the sound of things. [14:51] There's the name of things, and then there's the haptic, like playing the thing- [14:57] - Right [14:57] - ... probably. So playing chords, playing scales, you have, I believe, a course on scales [15:01] and on chords? Okay. Since we're doing the tangent, let's go. How do you recommend [15:06] people... There's a bunch of people listening to this that are curious about [15:10] how they can start in playing guitar, maybe even playing piano and maybe [15:14] maybe playing other instruments. Although guitar, of course, is the greatest [15:18] instrument of all time. [15:19] What are the early steps of that journey? What do you recommend people do in general? [15:23] - Well, if you're a beginner [15:26] getting a good beginner guitar course and learning, first of all, the open chords [15:30] in first position. A lot of songs can be played that way. A lot [15:34] of old songs can be played that way, maybe not new modern songs necessarily. [15:38] - So learning a few chords and with an eye towards maybe playing a song? [15:44] - Yeah. With an eye towards... You learn the chord shapes and you learn how to strum [15:48] basic patterns to begin with. I think the first [15:51] thing for learning guitar is actually how to position [15:55] your fingers so that you don't mute strings that you don't want to mute. [16:00] That's the hardest thing for people to do, basically, is to get their fingers [16:04] arched to where they... If you're playing a C major chord, your [16:07] index finger's on the first fret of the B string, and you have to have that open E string ringing [16:11] there. And it's hard for people to make those micro- [16:15] microadjustments. You take it for granted, like, you've been playing guitar- [16:18] ... for, I don't know, how many years? Forever, right? [16:21] - Forever, yeah. [16:22] - And you don't even think about stuff like that when you're playing a guitar solo. [16:26] Every little thing that you do if you're playing your Comfortably Numb guitar solo- [16:31] ... you have to, out of mid-air, strike the string that your finger's on to play [16:35] the note. And these are all fine adjustments that you're doing. [16:39] - I'm just a hobbyist recreational player, but it... Wow, you're taking me all the way [16:43] back. You're right, it's the haptic, the [16:47] physical aspect of it is really tricky. Comfortably Numb is a good [16:50] example, but if you do lead, you have to get a super [16:54] clean sound. Now, that's both when you're playing fast, you [16:58] want it to be super precise, but when you play slow, when you have one note, [17:02] and you're holding it, and you're bending it- ... it better be really clean. [17:06] And for that, it's... I guess you have to really place the finger in the right [17:10] place. Plus, there's the... Well, there's the [17:13] calluses, so it doesn't hurt. And then the [17:17] positioning of the string on the curvature of- [17:20] ... of the finger. Where does it fall? Like, how much do you bend the finger? [17:24] - You have to have enough flesh on it to actually raise [17:28] the- raise the string and pitch. Otherwise it- [17:31] - Yeah, 'cause you're lifting it with part of the flesh. And of course, you have to [17:35] decide, depends on how OCD you are, do you wanna be, like, the [17:39] perfect, the proper musician? Or do you wanna do a [17:43] Hendrix? So the thumb over the top. [17:46] - Way over the top, yes. [17:48] - And so, like, you... if you have a fretboard here, I think the [17:51] more, like, classical guitarists, the very proper, perfect perpendicular [17:58] alignment of the fingertips to the fretboard, versus, [18:02] like, Hendrix's, like, "Fuck it. You nerds. I'm gonna do it." With the [18:10] messiness is part of the magic. Of course, like [18:14] B.B. King is also kind of messy looking in terms of his [18:18] positioning of the fingers, but his tone is incredibly clean. [18:22] - Yes, super clean. [18:23] - So, like, that teaches you that maybe any position can converge [18:27] towards a super clean tone. You just have to figure it out. [18:30] - I think a lot of it has to do with [18:33] how they wear their guitars. If you wear your guitar low, if you're Hendrix and you're wearing your [18:37] guitar [18:37] - That's true [18:38] - ... if you're wearing it lower, then you can't get your fingers [18:44] on top of it like that. And the thumb acts as a way to mute the lower [18:49] strings from ringing if you're playing through a loud amplifier. So there's [18:53] so many other micro-adjustments when you're playing leads, 'cause you have to kind [18:57] of mute the other strings that are... so they don't ring out- [19:01] ... if you're playing the first note in Comfortably Numb and the solo at the [19:05] end, and you're at the ninth fret of the G string, and you bend that [19:09] ... if you bend that G string and you accidentally hit the B string under it [19:14] ... you don't want that ringing. So you have to kind of angle your index finger so it [19:18] - To mute [19:18] - ... to mute that. [19:19] So all these micro-adjustments that you don't even think about... I mean, you're not thinking [19:23] about that, Lex, when you're playing it. You've done it so many times that [19:27] these things are just part of your brain. That's why this is [19:32] such a great brain developer for kids to learn instruments. [19:36] - Yeah, of course, you have to solve that puzzle. It must be really frustrating in the [19:40] beginning, like holding a chord. Like all of 'em, and it hurts too, right? [19:46] - It does hurt. [19:46] - If you're doing acoustic guitar. [19:47] - Not for that long, though. For like a week. [19:51] - Couple, couple, yeah. [19:51] - Couple weeks. [19:53] - Couple. [19:55] - I don't want to discourage anyone, you know. It's actually pretty easy to learn [19:58] basic stuff. [19:59] - Right, but the pain is temporary, I guess is the point I'm trying to make. [20:03] - It is. [20:04] - Uh, so what else? So the physical component, play a few [20:08] chords, where does the journey continue if you're learning guitar? [20:11] - Well then, it's like if you play electric guitar, then you get into [20:15] single note playing and stuff like that. That's where it gets, to me, where it gets really [20:19] fun. You know, you have single note playing with riffs, [20:22] if you think of Back in Black, right, that has a riff [20:26] embedded in the actual melody. Or many [20:30] songs that have riffs, the Hendrix stuff that has chordal [20:34] riffs, and you're moving up the neck and, [20:38] Involving all the fingers and things like that. So there's... it really depends [20:42] on what you wanna, what styles you wanna play. [20:44] - So you're thinking about song learning. So different components of song learning. [20:48] So riffs in songs, lead-in songs. [20:52] - And then you have finger picking, if you have Stairway to Heaven, songs like that. [20:56] How 'bout wanting to learn that, that involves finger picking, because the, you [21:00] have to isolate certain notes of the chord and play two [21:04] together, you know, and multiple times. [21:07] - There's a few crossroads where you get to select things. Uh, [21:11] so I guess you're speaking to the fact there's a... if you're righty, there's a right hand [21:15] that you can use your fingers or you can use a pick. [21:18] - Correct. [21:19] - And that's a choice you make. [21:20] - And sometimes you use both, 'cause in Stairway to Heaven, you're using the fingers at [21:24] the beginning, or fingers and pick, hybrid, they call [21:28] it hybrid picking, and then later on, you're using the pick to [21:32] flat pick the picking patterns. [21:34] - On the music theory front, do you recommend people learn scales and chords and like the [21:38] theory of it? [21:40] - Uh, later on I would say. I wouldn't say necessarily right off the bat. [21:45] I think learning songs is the first thing that you should [21:49] do 'cause that you want to keep people motivated. [21:52] - So you get them to like fall in love with music and playing? [21:55] - Yes. [21:56] - All right. And that takes a couple months, three months? [21:59] - Depends on how motivated they are. [22:02] - So you recommend practicing, what, every day? [22:04] - Every day. My son, Dylan, when he started learning the guitar a couple years [22:08] ago, I said, "It's better to practice [22:12] 10 minutes a day, seven days a week than to practice one day [22:16] for an hour, which is roughly the same amount of time." [22:19] - Yeah, but it usually turns into something longer. But otherwise, [22:23] like, if you're a busy life, you know, taking a day off, [22:27] that day turns into a week, and then a week turns into a month, and all of a sudden you haven't touched the [22:31] instrument for months. [22:33] - Which is why I leave my guitar on a stand all the time, so [22:37] that if I walk by it, I'm like, "Oh, okay, I'll just pick it up for a second." Then that second [22:40] turns into 10 minutes, and an hour, two hours. [22:43] - All right, we gotta talk about this Dylan video. So this might be one of the earliest- [22:47] - That's the first one. [22:48] - That's the first video on the channel. [22:50] - It was, it was actually before the channel, 'cause this actually blew up on Facebook- [22:54] - Facebook [22:54] - ... and then I put it on YouTube after. [22:59] - Uh, so if it's okay? [23:00] - Yeah. Okay, Dylan, we're gonna do the hardest ear training test of all [23:04] time. Are you ready? [23:06] - Ready. Oh. [23:10] - Now, I... just a quick backstory on this. [23:12] I made this for my friend Shane's wife who wanted to see... 'cause Shane was a- [23:18] a friend that I was producing, and he was there, [23:22] and Dylan had come down the day, in the day, and I said, "Oh, check this out," and I played this [23:26] stuff. He's like, "That's amazing. Can you make a video so I can show my wife?" [23:30] And I was on the way to a school board meeting, 'cause I was on the school board at Dylan's [23:34] school- [23:35] ... and I said, "Hey, Dylan, come downstairs. I want to make this video. It'll take one [23:39] minute, just need to do this thing for my friend, Shane." And he's like, "I don't want [23:43] to." And I said, "Come on, this'll take one minute." "I don't want to." So I said [23:47] to my wife, I'm like, "Nina, would you tell Dylan to come downstairs? I want to do this [23:51] video. It'll take one minute." She's like, [23:55] Dylan, go downstairs." And he had, he has a mouthful of candy there- [23:58] ... 'cause he was eating candy. So if you look at him, he literally has a [24:01] mouthful of candy while he's doing this. [24:04] - And we should say, on Facebook it went quite viral. [24:08] - Yeah, like got... I don't know, 80 million views. Something like, it [24:12] had like 250,000 comments. Something like that. Insane. [24:15] - How old is Dylan here? [24:16] - He's eight. [24:17] - Eight years old? [24:18] - Yeah. [24:18] - Can you actually give some more backstory about, like, how you discovered that Dylan has perfect [24:22] pitch? [24:23] - So when Dylan was about two, he... I was [24:27] doing a FaceTime with my brother Jon, and I was like, "Check this [24:31] out, Jon." And I played the Stone in Love, Neal Schon's solo from Journey, [24:35] and I was like, "Check this out." And Dylan would sing along [24:38] and my brother Jon was like, "Wow, [24:42] Dylan can sing all the notes." And I was like, "Yeah." Then I played Black Dog, Zeppelin- [24:45] ... and Dylan would sing that. And it's like, "Dylan's got a good ear." Then Jon and I [24:49] were like, "Well, we have good ears, too." So it was probably... Maybe we could have done that when we were that age. [24:53] So a couple years, more years goes by. Well, he was about three and a half, and I'm in the [24:57] car. I was like, "Dylan, sing the Star Wars theme." And he sings it, and I'm [25:01] like, "That's in the right key." And I checked. I [25:05] play it on my phone, and I was like, "Oh my gosh." Then I ask him, "Play... Sing the Superman [25:09] theme." Because we'd been listening to John Williams soundtracks the week before, [25:13] and he sings that. And that was in the right key. And I ask him another [25:17] song. So I turn the car around, I go back to the studio. I go to the [25:21] piano, I hit the note B-flat, and Dylan says, "Star [25:24] Wars." Star Wars starts on a big B-flat major chord, but [25:28] it's the note B-flat is the main one that you hear. And then I play the [25:32] note G, and he goes, "Superman." And that's the first note in the trumpet part of the- [25:36] ...of the Superman theme. And then I realized that he had perfect pitch, and then [25:40] in five minutes, I taught him the name of the 12 notes. [25:43] Which he already knew, but he just didn't know the names. [25:46] - Oh, so you just associate the names— [25:48] - Yeah [25:48] - ...of the thing he knows. What do you think is this in his mind? 'Cause it's not just [25:51] individual notes. He can, like, hear everything. What is that? [25:56] - He doesn't see colors. He just says every note sounds completely different. [26:01] - Wow. Like you said, maybe it's a language thing. [26:06] Because it really is a... He just learned the language. [26:09] - Yeah, the language. [26:10] - There's- [26:10] - It's like, it's like perfect it's like native music [26:14] fluency, if you think of it like that. [26:16] - So let's listen to some of this. [26:18] - Turn around. Here we go. As fast as you can, we're going to start with single notes, then we're going to do some [26:22] intervals, then chords. Okay, here we go. A. C-sharp. B-flat. C. D. A-flat. [26:30] - Okay, good. Two notes at once. Here we go. [26:33] - C-flat. Great. How about this? B-flat, A. Great. What about this? B-flat, A-flat. [26:41] - This is incredible. [26:42] - Great. How about this? C, B-flat. [26:47] - And then how about this? [26:50] - E-flat. What is it? E, E-flat. Correct. Okay. He's, he's annoyed. He's annoyed. [26:58] The part of this, when I play these next chords, that's really [27:02] I think why the video went so viral, the next part of this. [27:05] Where I play these super complex polychords. Okay, I'm going to do some polychords [27:10] for you. These are really going to be hard. You ready? What's this? [27:14] C augmented over D-flat augmented. Okay, sing a B-flat. Mm. Very good. What's this [27:22] chord? Uh... A-flat— Oh, A-flat major over A major. Great, sing an F-sharp. Mm. [27:37] Excellent. What's this chord? A minor over D-flat major. Great. What's this chord? [27:50] E add 9 over F major. Excellent. E add 9 over F major. So I had to look at my hand to make sure that [27:54] that's what it was— ...'cause they're all in inversions. [27:57] So I think the reason that this went so viral is that the more that [28:01] someone knew about music, the more that they shared the [28:05] video. Because these polychords... So the people that were the best musicians [28:12] were li- were... Would... Looked at it and was like, "Oh my God." You know, it's C [28:16] augmented over D-flat augmented. [28:19] Um, and the the second chord was A-flat major over A [28:23] major, but they were both in inversion, right? So it was like a first [28:27] inversion A-flat major chord, first inversion A major chord. And then [28:31] an A minor over D-flat major, and then E add 9 over F major. [28:35] And for an eight-year-old... I mean, for anyone— [28:38] ... plus they're all close-voiced. They're all just right next to each other. [28:42] - Yeah, yeah. [28:42] - It's not like, you know, where you can hear them clear. It's all in the mid-range of the piano. [28:46] So you have to really listen and and you have to di—... He has to [28:50] dissect each one. Like, what are the notes being played there, [28:54] and and what is... Like, what's the theory? 'Cause he's actually [28:58] using music theory— ... to dissect them. [29:00] - It must be in his brain, those components of the chords all sound different. Like- [29:06] ... very clearly different. [29:07] - Yes. [29:08] - It's truly incredible. The human mind's incredible. So you're saying, like, some [29:12] part of that is the things you hear in the first few months of life? [29:18] - I did a thing where I played what I call high information music. [29:22] High information music would be Bach, Well-Tempered Clavier, fugues, yeah, any- [29:29] anything Bach. [29:31] And I would play the Well-Tempered Clavier, and I would play... I have a, [29:35] a friend who... Turkish pianist who's one of the greatest improvisers I've [29:39] ever heard. His name's Aydin Esen. [29:41] And I would play Aydin's improvisations for Dylan. It had very [29:45] sophisticated harmony and linear things in it. And Keith Jarrett, and mainly [29:52] jazz, classical, and modern classical music. And then, [29:56] then we would play, listen to rock music once he was born. I'm talking on my wife's stomach before [30:00] Dylan was born— ... starting at 15 weeks, for 30 minutes a night. [30:05] And then when Dylan was born, I would sit with him for an hour [30:09] every morning and listen to music— [30:11] ... and I would look at him. In order for this for them [30:15] to... hear these phonemes apparently and develop [30:19] this language, or get the... The language acquisition has [30:22] to involve the social brain. [30:26] So, when kids look at you, when a baby's looking at you, they're looking at your [30:29] mouth and they're getting social cues from that. And this is [30:33] also another component of saying "This is where this word stops or [30:41] starts and stops. These are how this, the phonemes are [30:44] separated from one another. These are how they're connected." So I believe that [30:48] all kids are born with perfect pitch and then around nine months they begin [30:52] to lose it. If you don't engage their social brain, making these pitches [30:56] know ... I never played pitches for Dylan and said, "This is a C, this is a B flat-" [31:00] "... this is a G." I just played complex- [31:04] ...high-information music form. And played with him. [31:07] - And that applies maybe even more generally to high-information language. [31:11] - Yes. [31:13] - And it starts before they're born. I think I saw [31:17] some of these incredible scientists that work [31:21] on the neuroscience, the neurobiology, psychology of language [31:25] in early life. I think a big part [31:29] is you, in the mother's stomach you're listening to the mother speak. [31:33] - Yes. That's right. [31:35] - So, like, that's how on the language side you're picking up the language already. [31:39] - That's right. And you're picking up the music, musical language. [31:43] So, native music fluency, you could call it. [31:46] - So if the mother's sitting back and listening to Bach and some [31:50] bebop jazz, you have a, you have a pretty good chance. [31:54] - Much better chance. [31:56] - Okay. All right. So as we unwind our way back Joe Pass and bebop. You were [32:02] You were funny enough talking about what is bebop [32:06] jazz and, and that would be people like Joe Pass. And in your own life, your [32:10] dad was somehow listening to that kind of incredibly [32:14] complex and sophisticated music- [32:16] - But wasn't a musician. [32:17] - Wasn't a musician. [32:17] - Which was very weird. We never... I have six siblings [32:21] and we could never figure out why dad liked really sophisticated jazz. [32:26] - We just took it for granted at that time. [32:28] - Yeah, just took it for granted. And my dad passed away in 2004 and we [32:32] never really talked about that, but he and I used to listen to music together all the time. [32:35] We'd put on a record, I'd sit on one side of the room, he'd sit on the [32:39] other and not say a word. Listen through the whole side A. I'd go flip it over, [32:45] listen to side B, never say a word. [32:48] And then get up and go do stuff. And we did that all the time. [32:52] - And so the first time you impressed your dad was with the Joe Pass song, right? [32:57] And by the way, we'll have to go to this song 'cause people must have [33:01] forgot 'cause right? People just think [33:05] you're like a good communicator or something. [33:09] They don't realize how good you are at guitar, how good you are at [33:13] actually a lot of instruments, but guitar especially. And there's this [33:17] video. The greatest guitar solo, period. [33:22] Can you give me some context for this particular [33:26] intricate, complicated solo? Who's Joe Pass? [33:29] - Joe Pass was a guitarist. He lived from 1929 to 1994. And he was one of the [33:36] greatest bebop players and solo guitar [33:40] players. So he made a record that this is off of called Virtuoso in [33:44] 1973 that my dad gave me for Christmas [33:48] when I was in 10th grade. And he said ... And this is not like my dad. My dad worked [33:51] for the railroad. He was very, you know, few words [33:55] spoken. Born in 1919. He said, "If you ever learn to play guitar like [33:59] this, you've accomplished something with your life." [34:02] And I was like, "What?" So this let, record stay, was [34:06] unopened until about March after Christmas. And one day I was like, "Okay, I'll [34:10] open it up." And I put it on, I start listening to it. [34:13] And I was like, "Whoa, this is kinda cool." [34:17] And so I said, "I think I can figure out some of this stuff." So I figured out [34:23] this thing. [34:24] - Is it by ear mostly? [34:25] - Yeah, just by ear. I didn't know any of the chords or anything. [34:28] - If you can listen to a little bit here. [34:29] - If you go back to that Brother to Brother, Gino Vannelli thing with Carlos Rios [34:33] playing, that stuff is incredibly hard. This, I'm starting, I don't know any of these chords. [34:37] So I start out ... I don't even know what that chord is, but I figured it out. I [34:41] I just, and it's weird. I mean, look at that weird bar. [34:46] - So you're just finding like, playing around with the, putting your fingers- [34:51] - Yes [34:51] - ... on the various positions. [34:52] - Right, but trying every combination of fingers. I had never played that chord. That's a weird-looking [34:56] chord. And, but I kept ... I moved my fingers around till I [35:01] heard to where it sounded like, "Oh, that's it, definitely." [35:04] And I just looked at my hands like, "What is that?" Had no idea what it was. [35:08] - So you were connected to the... you were really connected to the music. [35:12] The... And so that, that's why you can hear... It's not necessarily... Did you even, you [35:16] didn't have perfect pitch. [35:17] - No. [35:17] - You, and not even relative pitch. [35:20] - No, I did not. [35:21] No, I didn't know anything about intervals. I didn't know anything about music theory, anything. [35:24] This is all just- [35:25] - Yeah. You're just like playing- [35:26] - Ear [35:26] - ... around with different shapes. That's amazing. [35:27] - That's right. I mean, look at that weird bar there. . But then you get into these [35:31] thing. So that stuff there, I could figure out And then this. [35:48] That stuff I could figure out. And then these things [35:50] here. Those are just inversions of an— But I didn't know that. [35:57] I had heard Joe play that on the record. This is the last song on there. I'd listened to it a bunch of times and [36:01] I started- [36:02] - So you just replay over and over and over and over, and you're, like, trying [36:06] to replicate it. [36:07] - Yes. And I'm memorizing every different chord shape. All the chord shapes that I [36:11] had never played before. [36:12] - Would you recommend people do something like that on a really complicated song? [36:16] - Yeah, but there are so many YouTube videos that you can go and just learn it without having [36:20] to— Yes. Yeah, I would recommend. [36:24] - I feel like the struggle- [36:25] - The struggle is where it's at. [36:26] - ... this is true for education in general. People... Like, there's all these [36:30] educators that try to make learning easier [36:34] and more fun, and all that kind of stuff. Great, wonderful, [36:38] but part of the thing is the struggle. [36:41] - Absolutely. [36:42] - But yeah, let's— [36:43] - I'm sorry, hearing there's. [36:44] - Let's... You're nuts. [36:49] - I heard licks like that all over this, so I knew that that was and then [36:57] these licks here, he plays a lot of ideas like that. That's basically a C9 [37:04] chord in the top notes of it. [37:09] So all these are just inversions of the same chord. So if I could [37:13] play that, then it's just figuring out the single notes, okay? So... [37:31] Okay, so if you just take this first part here when he goes [37:36] So this, this intro part is... [37:38] - You make it sound so simple when you break it down. And, and by the way, Joe Pass, incredible [37:42] guitar player. Like, this is obvious. [37:45] - And he improvised all this. He could have played it like this. [37:48] - But, you know, the first was the individual notes. Look at that. [37:54] - Ooh, that's hard. Maybe just play it like that. That sounds more realistic. [38:08] - The amount of different genres that you're able to replicate is just incredible. [38:14] - This is just taking the needle, moving it there, then going back a little, oh, [38:17] there. And then by the end, the record was so scratched. [38:24] It was, but it was worth it. When I played it for my dad- [38:29] ... he couldn't believe. I mean, he didn't say, "That's amazing." He was just like, [38:32] "Hmm, pretty good." [38:35] - So what was the role of bebop jazz in the history of music? It seems like [38:38] it was influential in your life. Another guy you had an incredible [38:42] interview with Flea. People should go listen to that. Was a great conversation. [38:46] One of the things that surprised me is just how many musical genres influenced [38:50] Flea. And the guy showed up in a Miles Davis T-shirt. And- [38:55] - Bebop. [38:56] - And - [38:56] - Miles Davis played with Charlie Parker- [38:59] ... when he was 18 years old. And that's... He was... Charlie Parker was really his [39:02] mentor. [39:03] - Can you explain to me why, with many of the folks you've interviewed [39:09] and in general out there, in the world of [39:12] jazz, all roads lead to Miles Davis? Why he's such an influential figure? [39:17] - Because he was the greatest innovator in the history of [39:20] jazz. He was at the forefront of all these different [39:23] styles of jazz. I mean, he started as a bebop player, and then [39:27] he, he had records like the Birth of Cool, and modal jazz, and hard bop, [39:35] and records like Bitches Brew, where he started to, I guess you [39:38] would call fusion. You start to get these records. You [39:42] had two main groups of Miles Davis. You had the Miles Davis [39:46] '50s quintet and the Miles Davis '60s quintet. [39:50] Now, Miles made records with many people, but the '50s quintet had John Coltrane [39:54] in it. Had, I mean, had different piano players. Could... Wynton Kelly, but Paul [39:58] Chambers in the bass, Philly Joe Jones on the drums. And that particular group [40:04] was made just incredibly important records. And then he had his '60s group, which [40:12] was Herbie Hancock on the piano, Ron Carter on the [40:15] bass, Tony Williams on the drums, and Wayne Shorter on the [40:19] saxophone. And they made all these incredibly important records. [40:25] - I forget who said it in an interview with you, but they talked about like, [40:31] uh, Miles Davis his music feeling like [40:35] I think toes hanging over the cliff or something like this. [40:39] Meaning, like, there's always a risk, there's a danger that you're willing to make, [40:44] to fuck it all up live. And that feeling is what creates the aliveness of the [40:52] music. Like, can you speak to that? Just the, the [40:56] creating in the music, the feeling like you're on the [41:00] edge. Like, you're challenging the [41:03] possibilities of what can happen, and, and it all can go to shit, and [41:07] because of that, it feels alive. [41:09] - Well, when I interviewed Ron Carter that played in, in Miles's [41:13] '60s quintet, I asked Ron, 'cause Ron did records, he played bass on 2,200 [41:21] recording, famous records. And I said, "Did you guys ever [41:25] rehearse with Miles?" "No, never." I said, "So, you, [41:29] what, what would you do?" He goes, "We'd just show up at the studio, and he'd have the [41:32] charts, put them on the stand and we would," "we'd just roll." [41:37] And I said, "Would you listen to it after?" "No." [41:41] And I said, "Well, what about your, what about the, the live records that you [41:45] did at, when you'd record at clubs and things like that?" He goes, "We never knew that we [41:49] were recording." He goes, "Maybe I'd see a, a microphone, a different kind of [41:53] microphone in my bass amp." He goes, "Then months later, a record [41:57] would come out and I'd see it, and I was on it, and I would take it down to the union and say, 'I [42:01] played on this record,' so you get paid for it." But he said, "We didn't even know [42:05] we were recording." [42:07] So Miles was always about, you know, don't think about it, just play. [42:14] - That's crazy. That was on purpose. That was done on purpose. [42:17] Not to, not to do the rehearsals. Not, none, none of that. [42:20] - Yeah, he wanted people to just feel it, [42:24] play it. Thought is the enemy of flow, as Vinnie Colaiuta told me. [42:30] - Thought is the enemy of flow. How do you make sense that Flea, [42:34] the bassist for the Red Hot Chili Peppers, is influenced by bebop jazz? [42:38] - So his stepfather was a jazz bass player. [42:42] And his... When his parents got divorced, his... [42:46] He was born in Australia, and then they moved to New [42:50] York. Then his parents got divorced, and his mom married his [42:54] stepfather, who was a jazz musician. And they then used to have jam [42:58] sessions at their place, and Flea [43:03] loved it. It was kind of like my upbringing with my [43:07] dad, playing jazz all the time. Once it gets inside you, it's just there. And [43:14] and so he is heavily influenced by jazz musicians. [43:19] - Yeah, his impression was just hilarious. I mean, he's a character. His whole physical way of being is [43:23] a character. And his impression of just upright bass is just fun, fun to [43:26] watch. His whole- [43:27] - His intensity when he picked up his bass during the interview, [43:31] it... He's an intense guy and funny, and you know, really um, emotional. And, [43:39] And he picks up his bass, and there's a fierceness that you [43:43] immediately feel. And he starts, he talks about how he practices. [43:47] And then when he starts doing the slapping stuff, he [43:50] gets, he's so into it. And, and I'm just sitting there going, "Whoa." Like, "Wow." [43:55] - Yeah, he talked about his practicing routine with you. And one of the things, he's like, "I have to [43:59] practice the slap." And- [44:01] ... you know, there's differences in the structure of the different bands. But usually, like, the [44:04] bassist has a vibe to them. [44:08] I don't know if we can put words to exactly what that is. There's a kind of energy [44:12] that drives the band. [44:14] - To me, the bass is one of the only instruments that, when you play a bad [44:18] note, everybody notices. I started on the bass- ... as a kid. [44:23] - Oh, interesting. But you also played drums. You also played- [44:26] - Yeah, but my first instrument was the cello in third grade. [44:29] - Oh. [44:29] - And then I switched to the bass in sixth grade. And my, I majored, my undergrad [44:33] degree is in classical bass. So I always think of myself as a bass player [44:40] first. And I always think the bass is the most important instrument because- [44:45] - Strong words. [44:46] - ... because as much as I love to play the guitar, and I [44:50] love to play the guitar more than anything, I think, but the bass really [44:53] defines what the quality of the chord is. 'Cause you can put the [44:57] root in there. You can put the third of the chord in the bass. You can put the fifth in there. [45:00] You can play a lot of notes. And whatever you play in the bass kinda defines what [45:04] kind of chord it is. So, the bass player has a lot of power. [45:08] - I have to go back to our, the beginning of our conversation. What do you think are some of the [45:12] great solos of all time? Can we [45:16] put a few into consideration? You have a great list on top [45:20] 20 rock guitar solos of all time. [45:22] - Yeah, so I put Comfortably Numb as my favorite, as my top one. [45:26] - Yeah, on that day, right? [45:27] - On that day. Right. Now the day later, I would have said, "It's the second solo." [45:34] - Okay. [45:34] - But I did the first solo because, because nobody talks about that solo. [45:38] And that solo is equally great. And when David [45:41] Gilmour... When I played it for him, and we [45:45] talked about it in my interview with him, it [45:47] was... Just to watch his face when he listened to it [45:51] was incredible. I mean, I'm thinking to myself, it's like, I'm sitting with David [45:55] Gilmour, and he's listening to Comfortably Numb. And he's [45:59] hearing it. He's played it a million times [46:02] live, but how many times has he gone back and listened to it on the record? [46:07] Probably not for a long time. And then he's hearing it, and he's like, "Ooh." [46:11] - Maybe you just don't look back. When you do great things, you don't look back. [46:14] - Miles never looked back. He never wanted to hear the old stuff. He always moved on. [46:18] - There was this funny moment where you made a video [46:23] why David Gilmour will never be on the channel. And then you ended up, of course, [46:26] interviewing him twice. He's one of the greatest guitar players of all [46:30] time. What do you think is at the core of his genius? [46:33] - He has just an incredible melodic sense. He knows [46:40] how phrases should be put together. There's a flow to [46:44] his ideas that I think is just incredible. It's the same with [46:47] Hendrix. This flow, how one idea [46:51] leads to the next, how there's space between them. It's just like speaking. [46:56] - That's what I read about Miles Davis is very good at understanding tempo [47:03] and the value of silence. And I think David Gilmour doesn't always play fast. [47:12] But he does a lot with less. [47:15] And then some of that is also on the more technical side, probably the tone [47:19] of the... I mean, he's one of the most uniquely recognizable tones in all of music. [47:26] What do you understand about what it takes to shape the tone that is David Gilmour? [47:30] - He has a very sophisticated setup- [47:33] ... for his tone, and that was one of the things when I went to his [47:35] studio. And I said to him, "So David, is there anything I'm not supposed to see [47:40] here?" I mean, he never sits down and shows- [47:42] ... people his gear, and he laughed about it. [47:44] But there I am, sitting there right next to all these pedals that ... And [47:48] I, and I asked his tech, Phil, I said, "These are the same ones you used on the [47:52] records?" He's like, "Yeah." His tech has been with him for, like, 50 [47:56] years. And I mean, the exact ones? Yes. It's just, it's hard to... It's [48:03] hard to imagine that those things still... Of course, though. [48:07] They... He's just kept it. Yeah, this is his Binson Echorec that he played [48:11] through, and this is this. [48:13] You know, these are all the same effects pedals. And the... Wait, is this [48:17] the same Hiwatt amp? Yeah. Is this the same... Yes. Yeah, you [48:20] get some new stuff. But they [48:24] keep all their own gear, and that's, uh ... I mean, he does sell his [48:28] guitars for charity. But, like, he has a black Strat that is a, it's a [48:32] signature version. It's like an exact copy of his old one. [48:35] So to him, it sounds exactly the same, plays the same. [48:39] - Well, of course, they converge towards that kind of f-... [48:42] hardware. But there's so many tiny details over [48:46] the years. You see the final result of it, but there's a [48:50] journey there, of exploring. And of course, he's not... [48:54] I guess he's not doing any soft... Like, no emulation, no amp? [48:56] - He does do emulation, actually. He does. He has this thing, [49:00] this is... I asked him in the first interview about this. There's a little [49:04] rack thing that I had heard that he used, but I asked him for sure. It's called the [49:08] Zoom 9030. I put out a short where he talks about [49:12] it. I said, "So, that, that Zoom 9030, is that a [49:16] real thing?" 'Cause I've read about it. He's like, "Yeah." And he talks about [49:19] how, when he's sitting there recording on his [49:22] own... And he runs Pro Tools himself, and so he'll be [49:26] sitting there. There's no one there to help him. He's like, "I'll just plug into this thing, and then [49:30] I'll play a solo with this model." It's like a kind of [49:34] '90s modeling, early modeling thing. [49:37] And he'll play a solo, and then after a while, you hear the solo, and it's like, [49:42] "Well, I'm not gonna replay that. That sounds great." You get used to the sound of it, and that's what it [49:45] is. So people always talked about, "Oh, well, he couldn't have used that. He's recording through an [49:49] amp," and... 'Cause it sounds great. And, [49:52] And then he's like, "Yeah, yeah, so that's what I use." And then I have the [49:56] video of it right there, and it says his presets, DG1 and [50:00] DG2 and, you know, whatever. [50:03] - What's your process for preparing for interviews like that? You've done a few [50:06] legendary people. [50:08] - I never prepare for interviews, because [50:13] I ask people things that I'm interested in knowing. [50:17] - So, just letting your curiosity just pull a- [50:19] - Yes [50:20] - ... pull you forward? [50:20] - And I can think of 100 questions to ask David Gilmour, [50:24] and... But I always ask my questions based on what they say to me. [50:28] So, but I do make a playlist of songs that I wanna talk about. [50:33] So, that kind of guides me, is that... 'Cause I wanna make sure that [50:39] There's specific things that I need to play to, so that you can jog his memory. [50:46] 'Cause anytime you play something that somebody recorded, even 50 years ago, they'll [50:50] remember. If they don't remember the exact specifics, that, [50:57] that brings it to life to them again. [50:59] And they can, they can kind of piece together some [51:03] aspects about it, and they can really talk. He can talk [51:07] about the phrasing and the, you know, the kind of melodic direction [51:11] of things like that. [51:12] - So, there's a lot of tiny details that go into a particular song, whether it's in the [51:16] production or how it's played or how it was composed, all that kind of [51:19] stuff. And you don't know what those are ahead of time. [51:22] - No. [51:23] - You just know the song, and you just are looking to jog their memory, [51:27] and maybe your own curiosity of like, "How did you do this?" Or, "How do, what, this [51:31] sound or that?" You make it look easy, but [51:35] you have to have a depth of knowledge. You're saying you don't prepare. [51:39] - I have an incredibly good memory. [51:41] - Exactly. [51:41] - That's what it is. It's that I can remember when records came [51:45] out, who produced them, where they recorded them, who was the [51:48] engineer, what songs are on it. [51:52] And not only that, but the people I'm interviewing know that I [51:56] can play all the parts- [51:58] ... of all the instruments, 'cause I've done breakdowns of their songs, which is why I get the [52:02] interviews with them in the first place, really. [52:06] - But the actual, like, the skill of the interview, the thing you're not [52:09] saying, the preparation, is the you young listening to bebop. [52:14] - That's right. [52:14] - It's the, it's the background knowledge, it's the soul [52:18] carrying with you, being able to radiate the love of the soul of music. [52:25] - I will say this, Lex, is that the other thing is that [52:29] most of these people have a really good sense of humor. [52:32] When I was, when... The first time I interviewed David in New York, my brother [52:36] John came along, and he is a massive David Gilmour fan. [52:40] That's his biggest influence as a guitar player. And so he [52:44] said, "You're interviewing David Gilmour? Oh, I'm coming." I was like, "All right. Come on. [52:47] Come on down." So, so my brother John's standing about five feet [52:50] away. And John is a sales guy, but he... Great guitar player. So John's [52:54] like... I was like, "This is John... This is... David, this is my brother, John." [52:58] "David, great to meet you, buddy." And you know, it sounds like it's so... He's a sales [53:02] guy. And, and so during the interview, I said, I was like, [53:07] "Hey, John, what was I gonna ask David? Oh, ask him about the Gilmour effect." "Oh, yeah, that's [53:10] right." And the Gilmour effect is my thing that I say in the comments section [53:14] when people say... Anytime anybody plays anything [53:17] technical, "Oh, yeah, that's great, but I much prefer David Gilmour." And so I [53:25] always call it the Gilmour effect. Anytime I have, like, Yngwie Malmsteen- [53:28] - Mm, yeah. [53:28] - Anybody that played, that has chops that I— [53:30] ... interview, the negative comments are always, "Well, I prefer David Gilmour." [53:36] - Yeah, yeah. [53:36] - And I said that, I told David that. He's like, "Well, maybe they should keep their [53:40] opinions to themselves." [53:43] - Yeah, a lot of these folks have really wonderful personalities, with a, with a trusted person [53:47] to be able to reveal that personality. So, Comfortably Numb at the top on that [53:51] day. What else is up there? [53:53] - Stairway to Heaven. Hey, Joe. [53:56] - But in that list, your top Hendrix solo is Hey, Joe? [54:01] - It's the first guitar solo I ever learned, so I had to put it on there. So, I don't, [54:05] necessarily do these by... I do those in kind of how [54:09] important they are to me and my development. [54:11] So, there's always a biographical component to these [54:15] lists. Number three was Kid Charlemagne, a Steely Dan solo— [54:19] Larry Carlton. Amazing solo, extremely difficult to figure out. [54:25] Probably, there's two solos on the list that are just [54:29] about, are very... That one I can play. [54:33] But there's a few solos that are very hard to play. Stone in Love by Journey, by Neal [54:37] Neal Schon, is very hard to play some licks. Um, [54:42] the, um—There's a song... There's a solo by a guitarist, Carlos [54:46] Rios, that people don't know. It's Brother to Brother, a Gino Vannelli song, but it's [54:51] extremely hard to play and figure out. And [54:55] that people don't know the solos. I put it on my list 'cause I knew that a lot of people were gonna watch it and [54:59] they're gonna know what this solo is. [55:01] - For me, the sentimental one, my, my first solo is Mr. Crowley, Randy [55:04] Rhoads. I like the musicality of Mr. Crowley, that there is a [55:08] melodic component to it. You're playing really fast, but there's a melody to [55:12] it. And also, there's like a legendary nature to the, [55:15] the brief time we had Randy Rhoads. [55:20] - Yes. [55:20] - It's probably one of the greatest guitarists ever. [55:23] - '56 to '82, I think. Terrible. Um, he was an absolute [55:31] brilliant guitarist, had his own style. [55:34] - We should say he's the guitarist for Ozzy Osbourne, the band. [55:37] - Yeah. And that Mr. Crowley solo is a great solo, great solo. And, [55:44] He's incredibly influential as a guitar player too, for metal guitar players and, [55:52] um, I love Randy Rhoads. [55:54] - Uh, another guy, so one of my favorites is Mark Knopfler. [56:00] - Yes. And I did have Mark Knopfler on my list, Sultans of Swing. [56:03] - That's right, you did have- [56:04] - Now, I had it high on the list, and I'll tell you why. [56:07] I would've had it lower 'cause it's one of the early ones, 'cause I wanted people to be like, [56:11] "Okay, oh, this is a serious list." [56:15] So Rick's gonna talk about serious stuff. So, um- [56:18] And Rick's gonna play along with all these things. [56:32] So I wanted to kind of state that at the beginning of the video. I mean, I made the [56:35] video in one day to do 20 solos. I think I played 19 of them, but the Heart [56:39] solo that I had on there- [56:41] ... Nancy Wilson, I played the video of. And I tried to get [56:46] a couple of my friends to play the Ice Cream Man, Van Halen solo. [56:50] - Yeah, it was just- [56:51] - So I called Dweezil Zappa, and I was like, "Dweezil, can you play the Ice Cream Man [56:55] solo? I'm making a video about it." He's like, "Oh, I'd have to practice that." Then I [56:58] called my friend Phil X who's an amazing guitar player, and he's like, "No, I'd have to [57:02] practice that." I was like, "Come on, man, can't let me play Ice Cream Man?" The [57:06] opening lick of Ice Cream Man that he plays is very hard to play 'cause [57:10] it's an incredibly long stretch. [57:13] And it hurt my fingers to do, and Eddie would turn his guitar up like [57:17] this to play. And plus, it's a tricky... It just... It's a tricky rhythm, [57:24] and, and it's such a big stretch. It's like, "Man, I can't... That hurts my hand." [57:28] - I just love that that's the Van Halen solo you have. The top 20. [57:34] - See, I have to do some- [57:35] - Yeah, yeah, yeah [57:36] - ... There's so many Van Halen. My God, it could be... There... I could pick [57:40] 25 different Van Halen solos. [57:42] - But to me, I mean, there really is nobody like [57:46] Mark Knopfler. I mean, his is unique guitars. There's something about his [57:50] tone. Speaking of Gilmour, there's just the tone, the care, [57:58] the timing of the notes. [58:00] His improvisation, like the live performances of Sultans of Swing that's been [58:04] actually going like somewhat viral around recently, his pretty old [58:11] live performance of Sultans of Swing. For me, Brothers in Arms, these kind of- [58:19] - Great [58:19] - ... soulful, mournful type of [58:22] solos, he does really, really well. Also, the interesting instrumentation [58:26] of Romeo and Juliet. Just so many... Just... Truly one of the greats. [58:31] - Now, obviously the intro to Money for Nothing is one of the [58:34] greatest. Almost impossible to recreate [58:38] that because of the sound is so unique and his... [58:42] It's just improvised. It's so cool. [58:46] - Yeah. There's certain songs like Europa by Santana, Santana can have that tone too. [58:52] That Mark Knopfler makes me real- just how clean it [58:55] is. I think he beats B.B. King in my book in terms of the cleanness of just [59:01] pure beauty of a single note. It's like a power of a single [59:05] note. I don't know anybody who beats Mark Knopfler. [59:09] - Well, that thing about being able to recognize somebody from a note. You know? [59:15] - Yeah, that's- [59:15] - When I hear Brian May, I can immediately recognize it's Brian May. [59:19] Incredibly melodic, the tone that he has. Gilmour, [59:23] Hendrix, everyone that we're talking about, Van Halen. It's just, they have that [59:29] one note. It's like, "Oh, I know who that is." And [59:32] that's, that's why we're talking about him. [59:35] - That'd be funny. That'd be a good video- [59:36] - B.B. King, you hear one note [59:38] - ... as a test of like how quickly can you recognize just a solo starts playing- [59:44] - That's a great... I'm gonna make that video- [59:46] - ... one note [59:46] - ... tomorrow. Lex, you'll- [59:49] - I don't know. [59:49] - The day after tomorrow, you'll see it. [59:52] - I would love to see that. [59:52] - Can you say, can you recognize these players by one note? [59:55] - By one note. [59:56] I think it's... I think we're being a little too aggressive with that. I think you [60:00] need like two or three or four- [60:01] - No, no, no, no [60:02] - ... or five notes. [60:02] - I guarantee you. So I was gonna do a video last week where I was gonna [60:06] play songs in reverse, okay? [60:09] See if you can recognize these songs in reverse. And I had my two assistants come in. [60:13] It's like, "Do you know what song that is?" They're like, "Oh, that's Adele." Like, [60:16] "What?" Then they're like, "Oh, that's, that's Nirvana." Instantly, [60:20] they could recognize. Like, "Well, that's not worth me." It's like, yeah, it's so obvious. [60:23] You hear the tone of the voice backwards, forwards, it doesn't matter. You know who it is. [60:27] - Oh, interesting. Okay. So it's about the tone. [60:30] How could you possibly know the... from a single note? I guess Van Halen, you can. [60:35] - One note of, of B.B. King's vibrato, you could know. [60:41] I'm gonna... What I'll do is I would separate the guitars. I can [60:44] actually separate the tracks, and I'll just play one note. [60:47] - You think you could, from a single vibrato, you can know it's B.B. King? [60:50] - Yes. Well, we'll see. [60:53] - Put it on record, I'm skeptical. [60:54] - I'm gonna do, I'll do twenty of them. Can you recognize these guitarists from [60:58] a single note? [60:59] - Could you recognize Stevie Ray Vaughan- [61:01] - Absolutely [61:01] - ... versus Eric Clapton? All right. You might be right. You might be right. Quick [61:11] 30-second thank-you to our sponsors. Check them out in the description. It [61:15] really is the best way to support this podcast. Go to lexfriedman.com/sponsors. [61:21] We've got Uplift Desk, for my favorite office desks, BetterHelp, for mental [61:25] health, LMNT, for electrolytes, Fin, for customer [61:29] service AI agents, Shopify, for selling stuff online, [61:32] and Perplexity, for curiosity-driven knowledge [61:36] exploration. Choose wisely, my friends. And now, back to my conversation with Rick [61:43] Beato. What do you think is the best Eric Clapton [61:47] song? One of the things we haven't mentioned so far is the importance of [61:53] lyrics and maybe meaning of the song- [61:56] ... and what it represents, so in that sense, Tears in Heaven. [61:59] - Well, the story behind that is heartbreaking. [62:03] - And then, I personally really love the sound of Wonderful Tonight. [62:08] - That's a great song. That's one of my favorite Clapton songs. [62:11] - And I, as I was, like, listening to it, [62:14] just doing a whole personal journey introspection, [62:18] knowing that I'm gonna talk to Rick Beato, [62:21] listening to just a bunch of songs, and I [62:24] learned, it's embarrassing that I didn't know the [62:28] stories behind the music, but I learned that Eric [62:32] Clapton was married for 10, for a decade [62:36] to the same woman that George Harrison was married to. [62:39] And that this woman was the muse, the inspiration [62:45] for, like, so many of the legendary songs of rock- [62:51] ... including Wonderful Tonight, including Layla- [62:55] ... and including George Harrison's Something. [62:59] Legendary song also. The same woman. Is she the greatest muse in rock history? [63:04] - Probably, yes. [63:05] - This is great. So in your interviews of musicians and producers, [63:12] I think the thing you're ultimately fascinated by is their whole, the [63:16] process, the recording, the production, the [63:20] songwriting, the different elements of the process. So, [63:24] Are there examples of different things that stand out to you [63:28] from the all the interviews you've done? And all by the way, all [63:32] the recording and production you've done yourself. So on the recording front, [63:36] on the production front, on the songwriting process front, just things [63:40] that pop into memory. [63:42] - When I've interviewed the guys that are the producers, like Rick [63:46] Rubin, Daniel Lanois, Brendan O'Brien, Butch Vig, the thing [63:50] about producers, as opposed to people that are musicians, if you're a in a [63:54] musician, even if you're David Gilmour, you do a record, and then you [63:58] tour, and then you do another record, maybe years go by, but [64:01] producers are working on multiple records, [64:05] you know, sometimes at a time. Rick Rubin could be working on [64:09] multiple records, and the variety of things [64:13] that they do, you can talk to. I mean, I can talk to Rick [64:16] about the Chili Peppers. I can talk to him about Johnny [64:20] Cash. I can talk to him about Tom Petty, and all these [64:24] records that I love, and there's just so many interesting stories [64:28] that ... I mean, these interviews could go on for, for days [64:32] with Rick, and the variety of records that he worked on. And there's so [64:40] much knowledge to be gained, for me at least, and [64:44] I think that the craft of production and [64:47] recording engineering is something that is not well-documented. Especially [64:55] since there's so few studios nowadays, where [64:58] there used to be a mentorship thing, where you'd go and you'd work as an assistant engineer. [65:03] And you'd work your way up. I interviewed a guy named Ken Scott that worked with the [65:07] Beatles. I interviewed him at Abbey Road Studios, it's just two months [65:10] ago, and he started as a tape op when he was 16. He started on the Hard Day's Night [65:18] record with the Beatles, and he worked his way up, and he said the first time he [65:22] ever recorded an orchestra was he recorded I Am the Walrus, the orchestra part. [65:26] He set up the mics, and I asked him, I said, "So where was the band?" "Standing right [65:30] behind me." The Beatles, right behind him. The guy I'm interviewing at Abbey [65:34] Road recorded I Am the Walrus there. I mean, he recorded many Beatles songs, and, [65:42] and he was 18 years old, and the ... I mean, I just can't, I can't even [65:46] fathom that. We ... They have a little cafe in the basement of Abbey Road, and I [65:50] said, "Did the Beatles come in here?" He goes, "Oh, yeah, they come in here and get coffee," [65:53] and I remember when they got two microwaves that [65:57] like the first microwaves in 1965, and they were amazed by them, and, [66:01] It's hard to imagine that I'm talking to people [66:04] that worked on these historic records. But, you [66:08] know, they all start with a blank tape or an empty hard [66:11] drive, and then, you've eventually [66:15] filled them up with this music that you can't, you can never [66:19] imagine it not existing, like Stairway to Heaven, or whatever it is. [66:25] - It's funny, like, looking back, even probably for them, just to realize they've [66:28] created that magic is hard to believe. [66:31] 'Cause you're looking at a blank thing and then magic comes out, and you don't even, [66:36] you don't even understand. I you don't understand, probably a lot of these [66:40] artists don't understand where that came from. They're channeling some deeper thing. [66:45] - When I interviewed Brian May, he told me, I can't even remember if this [66:49] was, if we talked about it on camera or not, but we talked about [66:52] Bohemian Rhapsody, and at the very end...There was a [66:56] thing where he was depressing his whammy bar a little bit, and it [67:00] sounds like the piano is out of tune. I never noticed it before. He mentioned [67:04] this to me. And he said it always bothered him. And there's always something [67:11] about these songs that bothers people. Even these songs that he- [67:16] - These old things, yeah. [67:17] - Right. There's always little things- [67:18] ... and they sit and they hear it, and they're like, "Oh, man. I wish I'd been up a little higher [67:22] on that," or whatever. [67:23] - I mean, that... there's certain moments in songs that are just [67:30] unlike anything else. In Bohemian Rhapsody when Freddie Mercury is, [67:34] "Sometimes wish I'd never been born at all." [67:38] And then guitar comes in. I mean, there's just nothing like that. [67:42] That was... That... I don't even know. I mean, that whole [67:46] thing, you've done videos on it. It's an incredibly complicated [67:50] composition. It's crazy that a popular song, popular [67:54] rock song could be this operatic, so [67:57] complicated. The other thing akin to that moment is, [68:00] Phil Collins with In the Air Tonight, the drum bridge. Do do do do do do do do. [68:08] Yeah. What is that? I don't understand how you can create [68:14] that. What is that? Why is that so magical? Why [68:18] is that so singular inside a particular song and in [68:22] rock history period? Like, these moments, I don't know, [68:26] musically, I don't understand how you create them 'cause it might be bigger than musical. [68:30] It might be cultural, all... a bunch of different elements, and plus, it's him [68:34] filled with ... Like, I've seen live performances. He has, like, a headset. He [68:38] does something. He's like a telemarketer or something. Like, [68:42] his whole vibe and look to him, he doesn't look like a rockstar, but he is. [68:48] - Those are hooks when you think about it, right? It's like, it's as much of a hook [68:51] as any, as the chorus of the song or any song. That [68:55] drum thing is something that people wait for, and they air drum to it. [68:59] Everybody air drums to it, and it is a hook, and [69:03] those are hard to create. Those are ... Those moments are really hard to create, [69:07] and usually they're done by accident. [69:09] - Yes, it's hard. If you chase it, you're not gonna get it. [69:13] In your conversation with Sting, he said something about [69:20] how modern music is simpler, more minimalistic, and, "The bridge is gone," I think- [69:27] ... he said. And he said he thought that, "The bridge is therapy." [69:34] It's, like, a chance for you to reflect, I guess, on the verse- [69:37] ... before the chorus comes in. [69:39] - That's right. [69:40] - It changed my view of the bridge, I suppose, is the therapeutic nature of it, at [69:43] least lyrically. You think he's onto something? The value of the bridge? [69:48] - The bridge is a place, I think, where you can kind of change [69:52] the frame of reference of a song. [69:55] - You could probably do anything, I guess. [69:56] - Lennon used to... He would have some kind of biting lyrics, like [70:04] "We Can Work It Out." So McCartney writes the, you know, "Try to see it my [70:08] way. Do I have to keep on going until I can't go on?" And then, but the bridge is very [70:12] Lennon. "Life is very short, and there's no time. For fussing and fighting, my [70:16] friend. I have always thought that it's a crime, so I'll ask you once again." [70:20] I mean, it's very, you know, very Lennon-esque. This is... That was really [70:23] a... kind of a real collaboration between the two of those. [70:29] - This is where different parts of the band can clash- [70:33] ... in interesting ways. I mean, the Beatles are the epitome of that. Such ... [70:36] Like, each individual Beatle is a great talent in their own right. [70:42] How were the Beatles able to create some of the greatest [70:46] songs of all time all before they turned 30 years old? [70:51] - I have never been able to figure that out, but I have a theory [70:56] that- ... because PA- [70:58] - I have a theory. [70:59] - Because PA systems were so bad back then- ... and the Beatles ... People [71:03] screamed so loudly that the Beatles thought, "Okay. We [71:06] don't, we don't need... We can't tour anymore 'cause we can't even hear ourselves, [71:10] so we're just gonna be a studio band." And maybe [71:14] because of... We have all these great late Beatles records, they're [71:18] from 1966 on, just because they had bad PA systems. [71:24] And they had no monitors. You know, they're in Shea Stadium. [71:28] People are screaming so loudly they can't hear themselves. They're like, "Okay, forget this. [71:32] We can't tour. We'll just make studio records," so that's what they did, and in that one [71:36] year, like, from August 6th, 1965, they put out Help. Then in December [71:42] 3rd, they put out Rubber Soul, of '65. Then August [71:48] 5th, they put out Revolver. So within 365 [71:52] days, they put out three 14, I think, 14-song [71:55] records. So they wrote and recorded three [71:59] incredibly important records. They were in the studio. It's like working out. [72:04] They're practicing their craft every day, writing [72:08] songs, trying to outdo the other ones, and [72:12] so you had the perfect thing of four supremely talented [72:17] musicians, songwriters, singers, and then the best [72:21] producer you could possibly have, George Martin, [72:25] and it was just a perfect storm. I think that when [72:29] I would talk to friends that would just play in local clubs, and they'd play [72:33] four-hour sets five nights a week, and they never lost their [72:36] voices because they're always working those muscles. [72:40] And same with the Beatles. They were always in the studio singing every single [72:44] day, doing takes, and I think that that was part of it, at least. [72:51] - But you also have this theory- that [72:56] you know, that the greatest productivity that musicians have is [73:00] before they turn 30. The greatest, sort of, creative [73:04] genius that can come out of the human mind musically is before the age of 30. [73:09] - Well, I think it's the same in mathematics, as well. [73:12] You have this fluid intelligence versus crystallized intelligence. [73:16] Fluid intelligence up until you're about, you know, in your late 20s, [73:19] 30 years old, and then crystallized, so you're using... The crystallized is [73:23] you're using your life experience to write things, so you'll find that composers: [73:31] Bach, Beethoven, Mozart wrote their most important works at [73:35] the end of their lives. Beethoven, the late string quartets, the Ninth Symphony, things like [73:39] that. So, they have a whole lifetime of experience that lead up to this, and [73:43] there's not... They're not improvising, but things for improvising, writing pop [73:47] songs, and that... I think when your mind is really most active and your brain [73:54] processing speed is at its pinnacle, that... This is just my theory- [74:01] ... that people can come up with those kind of ideas. Same with [74:05] improvising. I think that most jazz improvisers, not all, but [74:09] most, do their best improvising before the age of 30. [74:13] - Creating something new. [74:15] - Yes. [74:15] - Truly novel, that requires youth. [74:20] It's just a theory though, but it seems to apply. What do you think about the [74:25] 27 Club? A bunch of the music greats died at 27. [74:28] Hendrix, Brian Jones, Jim Morrison, Janis Joplin, Amy Winehouse. [74:33] - Kurt Cobain. [74:34] - Kurt Cobain, of course. A big part of music history is linked to drug history. [74:43] LSD, coke, heroin, weed. [74:48] - Smoking. [74:49] - Smoking. [74:50] - I think about this a lot. If you go back and you watch videos, The [74:54] Beatles, any of their movies, they're smoking all the time. [74:58] The Get Back documentary, they're smoking constantly. Go watch any of the [75:02] MTV Unplugged, Nirvana, Kurt Cobain is smoking every [75:06] second that he's not playing, he's smoking. Every singer [75:10] smoked. Every musician smoked. Nowadays, I asked [75:14] my son, Dylan, "Dylan, does anybody smoke" at his high school. He's like- [75:16] ..."Smoke? Nobody smokes." He's, he's... The- it was an absurd [75:19] question. And that was part of culture. [75:24] - It was for everybody. I mean, that was, that was a big transformation over the past 20 years and [75:28] just everybody stopped smoking. But I don't think smoking has the kinda hard [75:34] negative effect that we're talking about. I mean, I almost would [75:38] rather have them smoke than some of the other hard drugs. Maybe smoking [75:42] distracts them from the hard... I mean, heroin and [75:46] coke, I mean, those, those things really, and alcohol, unfortunately- [75:50] ... can be easily abused, I think. It seems like it's a... The, the life of a [75:56] musician, this dopamine thing of getting on stage and be [76:02] it, being adored by tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of [76:06] people, the high of that, and then the comedown after [76:11] is a really hard life, for just even neurobiologically, of like, [76:15] how do you deal with that? You have to be able to control [76:19] the rollercoaster of your mind, and of course drugs will be a part of [76:23] that. And you think everything is allowed and everything is [76:26] possible. And then there's also culture, depending on who [76:30] you hang out with, that certain kinds of categories of drugs [76:34] are good for your creativity. And so, naturally, you start to abuse those drugs. [76:43] I don't know. I think the, I think it's really [76:46] interesting the role that drugs have played in the, in the history of music. They have [76:51] certainly been extremely destructive, but they have also certainly been productive [76:59] muses, inspirations for some of these folks. [77:02] - Oh, absolutely. Now, would we [77:06] want to, you know, advocate people doing things like that to boost their creativity? [77:13] - No. [77:13] - Well, I wouldn't, but just like smoking, which I think improved people's voices- [77:21] ... I mean really, the raspiness of it- [77:23] ... this is the reason that the, that so many of these, [77:27] virtually every famous singer- [77:30] ... no matter what genre of music, jazz, soul, rock, they all smoked. [77:37] - Yeah, yeah. [77:37] - Nat King Cole. [77:38] - Miles Davis too? [77:40] - Miles smoked, everybody smoked. Miles did... Well, Miles [77:43] was a heroin addict too. I mean- [77:44] - Yeah, yeah, yeah. [77:45] - ... so many jazz musicians. [77:46] - Well, Miles had a sound to him. You're right. I mean, smoking [77:50] must, must play a gigantic role to that, adding some complexity to the voice. [77:56] - Yes. [77:56] - Yeah, some richness to the voice. [77:58] - Nat King Cole, he smoked, I think, four packs a day. He died of lung cancer. [78:03] Lotta heavy smokers though, as singers. [78:07] Frank Sinatra, heavy smoker. McCartney was a heavy smoker. Lennon, all [78:11] those guys smoked. [78:13] - Yeah, it's hard to know, chicken or the egg. But I certainly wouldn't recommend doing [78:17] drugs as a way to get better at music. [78:24] But, you know, it does seem to go hand-in-hand. And some of it [78:28] has to do with the period, with the time period, with the place, [78:32] 'cause sometimes it's part of the culture. The drug is like you're saying, smoking. [78:35] If you were smoking now, that's gonna be a very different experience than [78:39] smoking 10 years ago, 20 years ago, 50 years ago. There's a [78:42] different vibe. So, sometimes the drug is a deep [78:47] integrated part of the culture versus an actual chemical [78:50] substance. The '60s, right? They're... I don't know. They were on [78:54] everything in the '60s. [78:56] - Yeah.... I mean, it has to account for something, Lex, you know? [79:04] - Uh, on the songwriting front, you mentioned a story about Elton John [79:08] recording. So he's one of the legendary songwriters. But [79:12] yeah. You've met him, and you know something about the process of his, um- [79:17] - Yeah, 'cause he was recording in a studio in Atlanta that I [79:20] was working with a band that I was producing. And he was in, I was in Studio B, he was [79:24] in Studio A. And this band that I was working [79:28] with, they were called Jump, Little Children. And so, he had his assistant come in and ask, "Hey, is [79:32] this... Are you guys Jump, Little Children?" "Yeah, yeah, yeah." And then all of a [79:35] sudden, I couldn't see out into the live room. Elton walked into the [79:39] thing, and we were getting ready to track, and I'm, I'm pressing the button. "Yo, where are you [79:43] guys? What's up? I thought we were gonna start this." And no one's responding. I can hear [79:47] talking, it's like, "What, what is going on? Where are they?" Then all of a sudden they come back in the [79:50] studio and they were stunned. I said, "Where were you guys?" [79:54] "Elton John just walked into our session. And he said he's a big fan. He said to [79:58] come over when we're done and, and hang out in Studio A." [80:01] So, so we did, and he was there with Bernie Taupin, and they [80:05] were working on a song. And he, we talked there for, for an hour, and he was talking about [80:10] recording two records a year, and then they'd go on tour, and they'd write and record the [80:14] whole record in two weeks. So Bernie would give him [80:16] lyrics. Elton would go out and spend 15 [80:20] minutes writing all the melody. He'd look at his lyrics, and he was [80:24] doing that that day. Bernie was there, and they had a lyric sheet up on the piano. [80:28] And Elton would go on, and they'd just... "Okay, just record this." And Elton would sit there [80:32] and, and play and come up with the song- ... in 15 minutes or so. [80:38] - Yeah, that's crazy. [80:38] - There's a great version of, I think, Tiny Dancer, where Elton is coming [80:42] up with it on, it's on YouTube. And he's just coming up with the [80:46] music right there. And then the band, "Okay, here's how it goes." And they record it right [80:49] then. Then move onto the next song. I see this. I mean, it's really incredible. [80:55] That's it. Yeah. True. There's one there that I've sort of done the other day with Tiny [80:59] Dancer, which is about Bernie's girlfriend. So I just sort [81:02] of ran it through and then put two verses together, then a mid-like, then a [81:06] chorus, and then back to the sort of verse sort of thing. It's, it's a very... [81:10] It happens very quickly. It sounds long, but it's sort of, it sort of starts [81:13] off- << Blue jean baby, LA lady, seamstress for the band. Pirates man, pretty [81:31] eye, you marry >> [81:35] - Okay. [81:36] - I mean, it's really amazing that he just- [81:38] - Yeah. He's looking at just the lyrics. [81:39] - Yeah, and it's one of the, he's one of the very few people that has the lyrics [81:43] first and writes the music to it, which to me is far more difficult. [81:49] 99% of songwriters write the music first, and then they [81:53] put the melody and lyrics to the finished backing track. [81:58] - And maybe they write, like, lyrics, they write, like, Nonsense words kind of- [82:04] - Yes [82:04] - ... thing. And then they figure out from there. Yeah, that's... I mean, I [82:07] don't know what skill that is exactly, but that's [82:11] incredible. I mean, in that process he makes it his own. [82:15] - Yes. [82:16] - Okay. You had an amazing interview with Kirk Hammett. I'm a huge Metallica fan. [82:23] - Same here. [82:25] - Uh, there is a lot of interesting stuff that came out of that, from that [82:29] conversation. One is the distinction between heavy metal and hard rock. [82:34] - Yes. [82:34] - Which is very interesting. Of course, Metallica went through their own [82:37] evolution. They had many periods. I mean, they've been around 40 years. [82:43] - Over 40 years, yeah. Crazy. [82:45] - The other thing is the downpicking, which was interesting, which [82:49] is creating that really distinct sound. [82:52] - James and Kirk's, the down, the [82:55] downpicking, I used to be able to do that. I just can't do that anymore. It [82:59] hurts my thumb- [83:00] ... to, to do it. I think honestly, I thought a lot about it. It's like, why does it, why is it so [83:04] painful? Why is it so hard? It's from swiping with your thumb on phones. [83:09] And I think it affects that basal joint there, and, I'm sorry- No, I'm serious. [83:13] - I love your theories. [83:14] - Well, I think that that's actually right, 'cause I'm thinking like, "Why does that hurt so much to do that? [83:18] All the downstrokes and stuff." It's gotta be something. It's like, yeah, it's from, from [83:22] swiping with the phone. [83:23] - The other thing that came through is that he's an improviser at heart. [83:28] And that, I think clashes with this kind of rigid structure that metal is. [83:32] So there's a real soulful, melodic aspect to him. And he gave a [83:36] lot of props to James Hetfield for just being a great [83:40] composer, being a great musician and writer of riffs, of rhythm. [83:45] - The improvisation part of it you don't think of 'cause they've, they, 'cause you [83:49] have the finished songs that you listen to. But those songs are [83:53] born out of improvisations, of jams, of little fragments of ideas. [83:58] And then they craft them into these masterpieces. [84:04] - Also, you mentioned that... This is weird that I didn't know, that [84:07] Hendrix was, used different gauges of strings. [84:10] - Yeah, he was the one that talked about that, wasn't he? [84:13] Yeah, that was really interesting. See, these are the things that I like to [84:16] learn from these interviews with these [84:20] people. I was like, "What? Why have I never heard of that?" [84:24] - It's like, it's one of the ways you can find [84:26] uniqueness of sound, is by trying different things that are not... I mean, I guess [84:30] Apple was really good at this, right? [84:32] Like, completely breaking out of what you're supposed to do, the ways you're [84:36] supposed to do them, and doing it completely differently. You often ask [84:40] musicians what their perfect song is. First of all, that's an interesting question. [84:45] - What is a perfect song? [84:47] - Like, one surprise is, Hans Zimmer said God Only Knows by the Beach Boys. [84:52] - I was surprised by that too, but I thought it was like, "Yeah, okay, that's a perfect song for [84:55] sure." The first interview I ever did was with Peter Frampton in [84:59] 2018, and I asked him in that interview, "What's the [85:02] perfect song?" And he said A Whiter Shade of Pale. And I was like, "Ooh, [85:06] that's a great song." And I then I thought, [85:10] "I'm gonna ask that to people, just to see what they..." Now people are prepared if I ask [85:14] that. [85:14] - But it's like, they're willing to go out on a limb and say it. [85:18] Like, if you ask me, I don't even know. I guess you just say it, [85:21] whatever, right? Like, what would I even say? What's a perfect [85:24] song? Yeah, I would go... See, I feel the pressure. [85:29] - Right? [85:30] - Because the problem is, the reality is, it changes day by day, like minute by [85:36] minute. I... Yeah, I would probably, I'm sorry, but I would have to go Mark [85:45] Knopfler. And I would probably go... [85:49] Is it, is it really cheesy to say the obvious thing? I would go [85:53] Sultans of Swing. Even though like I'm tempted to say Europa, but then like... [85:58] - Sultans of Swing hits on so many levels- [86:00] ... 'cause it's got a great melody, great lyrics, and then multiple great guitar [86:06] solos. And has such a unique sound to it. The other thing is that it [86:11] sounds very different from other Dire Straits songs. I mean, this is like early- [86:15] ... Dire Straits Strat tone. And then you think of like Money for Nothing is a Les [86:18] Paul, and it's a totally different kind of vibe than him playing it on [86:24] Sultans of Swing. But that song's amazing. [86:26] - Plus it, it's about music. So it's like there's a, there's a meta [86:32] aspect to it. But then there's also like, we're talking about this guitar stuff, but Leonard [86:36] Cohen, Hallelujah. I mean, Leonard Cohen in general. Like these [86:40] songwriters, they go super simple on guitar. [86:43] And there, it's just what's that called? Singer-songwriter type. Uh, I told you off [86:50] my one of my, maybe the music guest that's a [86:56] dream guest is Tom Waits. I've wanted to talk to [87:00] Tom Waits for a very long time, and I've gone through different periods of... [87:07] You've met me at a point in my life where I've given up on it a little bit. And I [87:11] was trying- [87:11] - That's when it's gonna happen. That's- [87:13] - Okay. [87:13] - Once you give up on it, it's gonna happen. [87:16] - Yeah. Yeah. [87:19] - Why Tom Waits won't be on your podcast. [87:23] - Exactly. Exactly, dude. This is, this is my, this is my moment. [87:27] - Tom, come, come here. Let's do it. I wanna see it. [87:31] - I'm such a fan of, like the Zappa [87:35] artistry on the musical front, which Tom Waits has, [87:39] but I'm a sucker for great lyrics. Lyrics to me [87:43] is such a big part of great songs. And, and he's [87:47] another example. He has a song called Martha. It's about [87:51] a love story that didn't work out, and it's an older man calling [87:55] the woman that he was in love with, and basically reminiscing [87:59] about like, you know, thinking about like, "What would've happened if [88:03] it worked out?" That kinda thing. And then, you know, I loved that [88:07] song for a long time, and you know [88:11] at some point I found out that he wrote that when he was in his early [88:14] 20s. And you realize, it's similar with the Beatles, like- ... these [88:18] guys somehow were able to capture the human condition [88:22] so masterfully, and they're kids. This, I don't get it. I don't understand it. [88:29] - I can't speak for Tom Waits, but in the Beatles [88:32] case, they went to Hamburg, they spent time on their own, they played [88:36] cover gigs that were eight hours long, and they lived- [88:40] - Yeah, they've lived [88:40] - ... they lived life. It's not like, not like kids today. [88:46] - Now you're on a porch. You also had an amazing interview with Billy Corgan, of [88:53] Smashing Pumpkins. Uh, he is definitively one of my favorite musicians. [88:59] - I love Billy. [88:59] - You asked him an interesting question about how he creates this melancholy [89:03] feeling that permeates a lot of his songs, and he jokingly [89:07] said that the secret is all about the seventh and the ninth. Um, [89:14] so like, musically, chord-wise, what do you think about that? You think he's onto [89:18] something? [89:18] - He's talking a little music theory there. [89:21] Seventh and ninth over the chord that he's playing. So if you're playing a C chord, he's singing [89:25] a B, would be the seventh, D would be the ninth. And he does use a lot of [89:29] those notes. But almost all these people that we're talking... [89:33] No, all these people that we're talking about use these notes, and this is why [89:37] their songs... When I interviewed Sting, I called them surprise [89:40] tones, and Sting's like, "I like the way you use the word [89:43] "surprise." Notes that are outside [89:47] the chord that are dissonant with the chords that they're playing, but then that creates [89:51] emotion. Dissonance equals emotion. And [89:55] that's what I like. I want music to be... to depress me. [89:59] - Yeah. What is that? I don't know. They, the, but melancholy, and I think you [90:02] articulate it in areas, it's not actually that depressing. There's something [90:06] about that melancholy feeling [90:09] that is somehow the other side of the coin of happiness. It's a kind of longing. [90:16] Or there's a hopefulness to it. That aloneness that you feel. I mean, that's actually like one of the [90:20] intimate connections you have with music, is when you're alone. [90:24] There's, I think there's a social way of listening to music when maybe a concert and [90:28] so on, but there's this, there's nothing like you're alone in a car [90:32] driving, listening to, like, whatever it is, Bruce [90:36] Springsteen. Well, I think Louis CK has a bit about [90:39] that. And was it Bruce Springsteen? But he's, sometimes he has to pull [90:43] over to the side of the road and just weep, or something like this. It's just [90:47] the, there's something about that. Sometimes a song just connects with you. [90:51] And I don't know, nothing like a melancholy song could do that. [90:55] It... You think about, like, [90:59] maybe things you regret or how life could've worked out. And sometimes it's not [91:03] even about, like... It's not even real. It just connects [91:07] something to the, in the soul. The uneasiness that we all [91:10] feel. Maybe the loneliness we all feel that underpins so much of the human [91:14] condition, and it just connects with that. I don't know what that is. [91:16] - There's a Kurt Cobain lyric. It was on the In Utero record, [91:20] from the song Frances Farmer. The chorus part is, "I miss the [91:24] comfort of being sad." And I was like, "Yes." I miss the comfort in being [91:31] sad>> I was like, "Yeah, that's it right there." [91:35] - In terms of love songs, I somehow I find powerful [91:39] that kind of desperation. So like I've always connected with Pearl Jam's Black. [91:44] - Oh, amazing. [91:46] - Like that line is... A friend of mine was going through a breakup, so I was [91:50] listening and he, he's the one that introduced me to Pearl Jam during that whole [91:54] period when Pearl Jam was huge with Ten. That line is "Someday-" [92:02] - "Someday you'll have a beautiful life. You know, someday you'll be a [92:06] star in somebody else's sky. Why, why, why can't it be mine?" Oh my God, that— [92:15] ... blows me away. That's an amazing line. [92:19] - Well, yeah, I mean- [92:19] - The delivery is incredible on it too. [92:22] - Yeah. Eddie Vedder, one of the great frontmen of all time. [92:24] - Yes. [92:24] - And that whole period, that whole moment in history [92:28] of Kurt Cobain and Eddie Vedder that captured... That [92:32] was the '90s. That was one side of the '90s that [92:36] just... This singular moment in history. Who, who do you think are the great [92:41] frontmen in history of music? [92:44] - Freddie Mercury, Robert Plant. [92:47] - Freddie Mercury number one, probably. [92:48] - Steven Tyler. [92:50] - Jim Morrison. [92:51] - Jim Morrison? [92:52] - ... [92:52] - Yeah. Roger Daltrey. Um- [92:56] - Well, we have to say, I have to say, we have to say James Hetfield. [93:00] - James Hetfield? [93:01] - I mean, there's nothing... I mean, I have to talk to you about this. [93:05] I have... I mean, it's just the greatest, I think the greatest concert of all [93:09] time. This is their historic performance [93:13] in Moscow in September of '91. This is shortly [93:17] before the Soviet Union collapsed. Plus, we should mention AC/DC and Pantera- [93:23] ... were there too. And about 1.6 million people were [93:27] there. Now, by the way, there's like some kind of [93:30] reporting that there was a half a million people, [93:33] 500,000 people. There's somewhere I've seen statements like that. That's a [93:37] ridiculously inaccurate statement. So it's a free concert, so any official counts [93:45] don't count. It's, it's definitely over a million. [93:49] It's, it's very likely to be 1.5, 1.6 million people. And this [93:52] moment in history that I think they channeled, it's like [93:56] whenever great music, the... Metallica was firing on all cylinders at the [94:00] very top of their game, and they meet this moment in history and this place in history. [94:04] There was a defining part of the 20th century [94:07] collapsing, and you have these people who are [94:13] for a moment through music, are able to escape the fear, the anger [94:17] they feel, the... all of it. There was also a political, [94:21] social, cultural moment meeting [94:24] the musical moment, and the set list, I was just... I was li- [94:28] I listened to it several times over the past few days, just taking myself [94:32] back into that moment in time. Listen to this set list. Enter [94:36] Sandman, Creeping Death, Harvester of Sorrow, Fade to [94:39] Black, Sad but True, Master of Puppets, Seek and [94:43] Destroy, For Whom the Bell Tolls, One, and Whiplash. Look at that. How is that- [94:50] - That's- just- That's my kind of set [94:52] - ... get the fuck out of here. [94:53] - That's- [94:53] - This is amazing. This is- [94:54] - That's my kind of set right there. [94:57] - I don't know if you can think of anything that could beat that. [94:59] - I think that the guys in the band would say that, too. That was... I mean, they were really at [95:03] their, at their peak. The Black Album had just come out then, and [95:08] that must have been so, so exciting. [95:12] - I mean, Woodstock was big. There's certain moments in time that really, [95:16] really meet the moment. Are you a fan of live, live like big? [95:21] - I used to be, but at this point- [95:24] ... I can't you know... I'd much rather see people play in small clubs- [95:31] ... and, or go to the... I'd like to listen in the studio. Go to the studio, even. [95:37] - I generally almost entirely agree with you. I just think that there's these [95:41] historic moments, but you don't know- [95:43] ... which are gonna be which, but you're making the concert [95:46] free, it's just all of it, you get plus Pantera and AC/DC. The [95:53] other, which actually is a legitimate thing you mentioned, is [95:57] as one of the greatest concerts of all time [96:00] is Beethoven's world premiere of Ninth Symphony. You know, I [96:04] didn't really know the personal side of Beethoven until I [96:08] saw this movie called Immortal Beloved. It's an excellent movie with, uh- [96:12] - Gary Oldman [96:13] - ... Gary Oldman. Just a really... it's a masterful celebration of Beethoven in an [96:17] interesting kind of way through the perspective of a love letter that he's [96:21] written. But then I realized like... and this is early, this is many, many... [96:24] this is a couple decades ago now, that, you know, he went deaf [96:29] before he even started writing the Ninth Symphony, which is why they consider it to [96:32] be one of the greatest compositions of all time, the greatest symphonies [96:36] of all time. He went deaf, couldn't hear anything [96:41] before he even started writing it. And so there's that famous story [96:45] of him in that world premiere of [96:49] having to be turned around because he can't hear people applauding, so he has [96:52] to be turned around to see that people are actually clapping. I mean, [96:56] there's just this whole tragic element. Plus, [97:00] the meaning of the symphony that ends in this [97:04] beautiful Ode to Joy, the symphony itself is a kind [97:08] of... It starts with the chaos and conflict and ends [97:13] with this celebration of peace and [97:20] brotherly unity and a- I guess a call for that, a reaching for that, for [97:26] that peace. And it's a... and there's a tragic element to it, again, connected to [97:30] history, which is it was post Napoleonic Wars- [97:33] ... and before the American Civil War. So like, you're in this, in this [97:37] middle...... this respite from war, calling for peace, not knowing that truly [97:45] horrific wars are coming. So you have the American Civil War, and you have the, of course, the two [97:49] World Wars coming. So this, all of it together, and the [97:53] fact that he's conducting deaf, and he wrote this whole thing deaf. [97:57] I was reading a lot about his process, and he just edits and edits and edits and [98:01] edits. So the fact that he had to edit in his head is just insane. [98:07] - I mean, it— Beethoven was sick all the time too. I mean, a lot of people were sick all the time. [98:11] It was very common. What would motivate you to write [98:19] music, this beautiful music that you can never actually hear [98:23] except for in your head? Right? Like, why... The amount of time it takes to write, [98:30] to write a 35-minute, 40-minute piece, all the [98:34] parts, you got to hear all the orchestration in your head. You're editing, [98:38] you're doing all these things. Where do you get the motivation when you can't [98:44] hear the actual finished work? One, and people would say, "Well, he's [98:49] hears in his head." But what kind of enjoyment is it? You [98:53] wanna hear the orchestra... I mean, it's really profound that he was [99:00] inspired to do this. There's a thing called the Heiligenstadt [99:04] Testament that he wrote. It was a letter to his brothers in, [99:07] from 1802. I think they found it in his desk after Beethoven [99:11] died, and he felt a sense of shame and [99:14] humiliation because of his hearing loss. And he said that he was [99:18] afflicted with this thing where him of all people, that someone standing [99:24] next to him could hear a flute that he could not hear, or [99:28] a shepherd singing in the field that... And he could not hear [99:32] this. And, and of all the people, why him? Where hearing played [99:36] such an important part. Another person that would have had [99:40] to have had perfect pitch, 'cause you could never do this- [99:44] ... if you didn't have perfect pitch, which I think all of these great composers, for the most part. [99:48] Brahms didn't, from what I know, but all the rest of them, for sure, had [99:52] perfect pitch. So they could hear these things in their head, and that's how [99:56] they composed. [99:57] - I mean, you love sound and music. [100:03] What do you think it was like gradually losing your hearing for Beethoven? [100:08] - It must have been terrible. I mean, I, just... Terrible. I mean, [100:16] I've heard things where he would have a stick in his mouth, and put [100:20] it on the soundboard of the piano, and you could feel the [100:23] vibrations in his skull, and things like that. [100:26] - Yeah, desperately trying to- [100:27] - Yeah. I just— [100:30] - But also, there's, what is, what is that, that he's able to write [100:35] like one of the greatest symphonies ever, while [100:38] deaf? So there's something about that. We mentioned darkness, but torment [100:44] that he's going through. And ultimately, Ode to Joy. Like, not a cynical thing— [100:51] ... but a call for the positive. [100:55] - Yeah. Yeah. That's, that's— I've devoted many, many hours thinking about that. [101:04] - And plus, Napoleon broke his heart, because he was a supporter of Napoleon- [101:08] ... because Napoleon was supposed to represent [101:11] the French Revolution, this, this hopeful future of no more kings, [101:15] no more monarchs, no more authoritarian regimes. And [101:19] Napoleon ended up becoming, essentially, king. [101:22] Uh, becoming an authoritarian. And Beethoven, sort of [101:28] famously was critical of that. Nevertheless, I think maintained a fascination with [101:32] Napoleon throughout his life. But sort of a kind of more [101:36] sophisticated, complex view of human nature and human [101:39] civilization. So becoming more cynical. Like, seeing [101:44] more clearly that the world disappoints you, that dreams get [101:48] shattered. And through that, is able to still do this call for the hopeful future. [101:56] All right, so okay. So Beethoven, one of the greats, for [102:00] sure. Like basically everybody, I know how to [102:04] play the first movement of Moonlight Sonata, but I always avoided the third [102:07] movement 'cause I was like, "I'll never be good enough." [102:11] Never, never, but I need to- [102:13] - Never say never, Lex. [102:15] - One of these days, maybe. You know what would be great? If Tom Waits [102:19] writes me an email that says, "I only talk to people that can [102:22] play-" "... the third movement." [102:23] - Play the third movement. [102:24] - That'd be, that'd be a dream come true. [102:26] - There you go. [102:27] - I'd be like, "For this-" [102:28] - That's motivation. [102:29] - "That's my dragon," or whatever you do. You have to have a prince and rescue the [102:32] princess. My dragon is the third movement of Moonlight Sonata. [102:36] Okay. You often highlight the importance of Bach. In fact, so many of your guests... [102:42] - Every famous songwriter is influenced by Bach. They [102:45] are. The greatest composer of all time, the greatest musician of all time. [102:50] - Even Sting and Dominic Miller said they go to Bach even for, like, practice. [102:54] - Every day. People talk about Bach was not known other [102:58] than in his, the places he lived. Eisenach, he was [103:02] born in. Leipzig, he spent many years. But Bach was known to [103:09] great musicians. It was difficult to find manuscripts, but [103:13] there was a premier of the Saint Matthew Passion that Mendelssohn had [103:17] done in 17, in 1829. It was on March 11th, I believe. He had a manuscript [103:24] because his father and mother collected manuscripts. [103:30] And he got a manuscript of this piece, and he, I think he was 20 years old, [103:34] and, and they had a performance of it in Berlin... and Beethoven, [103:41] Mozart. They studied the Well-Tempered Clavier, the two books of the Well-Tempered [103:45] Clavier. But Bach wrote profoundly beautiful music, and [103:52] some of the most complex contrapuntal music that [103:56] I don't think anyone has ever done like that. [103:59] Extremely bright guy. Had 20 kids, 10 of them, only 10 survived [104:03] till adulthood. Lost both his parents when he was nine, within [104:07] nine months of each other. Went to live with an older brother. [104:11] - And extremely productive. Also. I, yeah, I think from all [104:16] the music teachers I've ever had, I understood the importance of studying Bach. [104:23] - He didn't write Master of Puppets, but he wrote some great powerful- [104:27] - Well put. [104:27] - ... music. [104:28] - Well put. I tried to educate the aforementioned [104:36] music teachers of the brilliance of the Master of Puppets. Sometimes a [104:41] good riff is greater than any musical composition. So— [104:44] - I agree. I go back and I play Master of Puppets [104:49] every time I'm trying out a new amplifier. That's my go-to. [104:52] - That's your go-to? So, like, so the stereotypical, like, guitar store [104:59] when you come in you're playing Master of Puppets? [105:01] - I'll play Master of Puppets. I will play, I have to play some heavy riff— [105:05] ... and so usually it will default to some Metallica or something like that. [105:09] Or I'll play Alice in Chains, or I do usually, like, a lot of times I'll [105:13] go and I'll do drop D something or play Tool. [105:17] I usually would do something, do some drop tuning thing. And it's always gotta [105:20] be some some type of metal that I'll test to see if the, if the bottom [105:24] end's tight on the amp and stuff. So, yes. [105:28] - All right. We have to talk about this a little bit. You made a bunch of videos about it. [105:33] There was a moment in time, it still goes on, but there was a moment where really [105:37] people were freaking out about the use of AI in music. [105:41] Uh, so there's these, I would say, incredible apps like [105:45] Suno, Udio. ElevenLabs Music is also [105:48] great. They can generate basically text to song, full song from a text prompt. [105:56] And a lot of people started freaking out just based on how good it is. [106:02] And so you start to immediately imagine how this is going to transform music, and you're [106:06] going to replace musicians and all that kind of stuff. It [106:10] is legitimately nerve-wracking because these are early versions, so you don't know where it [106:13] goes. But in your intuition now, you've been thinking about this, you made [106:17] a bunch of videos. Now, like, being able to reflect, "Okay, everybody [106:21] chill. Calm down." [106:23] - So if you write a prompt in Suno and it spits out a [106:27] song, which I've done, made a bunch of videos on this. I made up a [106:31] fake artist, Eli Mercer, in this video. Then I did a thing for CBS [106:34] News, I made up this fake artist, Sadie Winters, and came up [106:38] with this song, Walking Away. Well, the computer, the program came up with it. [106:42] - There is some creativity in a process. So in this particular thing, the [106:45] process is you generate an image. [106:48] - I did it in ChatGPT, the image. [106:50] Then I went to Claude and I wrote the lyrics, 'cause Claude's way better at lyrics- [106:55] ... than Suno is. Suno's bad at lyrics, at least right now. So I [106:59] so I did, I created the lyrics in Claude and then I imported the [107:03] lyrics into Suno, and I had great results with the [107:07] songs that I came up, that it came up with. I always have to qualify that. [107:12] But then I started thinking about this. People freak out about this, "Oh, this is bad, this is [107:16] bad." And then I thought, I was like, "No, who are gonna be the ones that are gonna [107:19] benefit from AI?" Well, the people that are already great songwriters, because you have to [107:23] be able to recognize when it spits out something good [107:27] versus when it spits out something that's not that good. [107:30] And every other song, I've probably created [107:33] 130 song ideas, out of which there's three good ones. [107:38] - And there's a thing that's happening where people's [107:42] ear very quickly is becoming attuned to AI slop. [107:46] - Yes. [107:46] - And that's actually quite fascinating. Like, for example, [107:50] One of the things, there's this viral clip going around of an [107:54] AI-based, like a soul jazz remix of songs like 50 [107:57] 50 Cent's Many Men, and I think it is super impressive. And there's a different [108:01] pipeline actually. [108:02] - Yes. [108:02] - It's a tricky pipeline to how to pull that off, and I think a lot of the [108:05] creativity in that, even that kind of remixing, is [108:09] in the pipeline of how you actually do that, [108:13] because there's actually a lot of manual stuff in that pipeline. Uh, [108:18] but I think ironically it's very cool at first, but when [108:22] you listen to it for a while you understand that this is AI slop. [108:27] - Yes. [108:28] - For a soul remix, it actually [108:32] lacks soul. But it made me think of, like, when I listen to soul or blues, [108:36] I think I really want, in that case, to know... I don't want an AI B.B. [108:42] King, I want the real B.B. King. And, and I, if I know, if any AI is involved [108:51] in the B.B. King process, I'm tuning out. [108:54] - Yes. [108:54] - And the, I don't think I'm being curmudgeonly old dude [108:58] in that. I think we humans want authenticity. [109:04] - So when AI, when I first started making these AI videos, it started back [109:07] in 2023, I made my first one, and [109:14] I would take my phone, come up in the kitchen, I'd play a [109:18] song, and then my youngest and Dylan... My youngest, [109:21] Layla, and I have three kids, and my oldest, Dylan, as soon as I [109:25] played it, "Why are you listening to AI?" And it's like, oh my God, [109:29] instantly. It's like, how do you know? Oh, it has this ringing sound [109:32] in the thing. So it took me probably about four or five days to figure out, [109:36] "Okay, what are they hearing that I'm not hearing?" So I did it, I separated [109:40] all the parts, and what they're hearing was the [109:44] artifacts that are in the vocal reverb. That sound- that [109:47] were... That made incomplete- [109:51] It just couldn't do the ambiances correctly, right? Because it's trained [109:54] on... A lot of these AI programs are trained on very low [109:58] bitrate MP3s, right? So, they feed all this [110:02] stuff in there. So, they're getting really inferior information on the [110:06] in the training process, whereas now when they make these deals with the [110:10] major labels, they'll get the multitracks, and they'll get high-quality [110:14] WAV files to train from, right? And whoever opts [110:18] in, they get the solo vocal tracks. You know, if Ed Sheeran wants to do it, [110:22] or Drake, or whoever wants to give their voice to it, let it do its thing, and then get the [110:26] royalties from it. [110:27] I'm not saying that any of them are doing it. I'm just giving an example. But [110:33] every time that I would do it, I could be down the hall, and I would play something in my phone [110:36] just to see if they'll be like, "Why are you listening to AI?" They can instantly tell. [110:40] Then it eventually started getting better. And then- and then, it'd be like, [110:45] "Is this AI?" I'd be in the car with Layla coming back from taekwondo [110:49] practice, and she's like, "Is this AI? Why? Does it sound like [110:53] AI? Sounds like it could be AI." And I'd be like, "Yeah, it's AI." She's [110:57] like, "Oh, it's getting better." [110:59] And then I did this song for... It was an NPR interview, and I created [111:03] a song with a fake artist. And the song was called Neon [111:06] Ghosts, and I played it for Layla in the car. She's [111:09] like, "Can you separate the tracks?" I said, "Yeah, I have them [111:13] separated back home." "Okay, I want to go down to hear it." So, we go down to the studio, [111:17] and I play it for her, and she listens to the soloed vocal. She said, [111:21] "Wow, this is really realistic." [111:24] "This is very hard to tell, even with the soloed vocal." [111:27] - I think the room for creativity right now for humans is lyrics. [111:34] It seems like the lyrics that are being generated, they lack soul somehow. [111:38] - Yes. [111:39] - And that's- I don't know the words correctly. [111:41] I mean, they can be incredibly sophisticated, but there's so- something, the [111:45] edge is not there. Some kind of edge that you- [111:49] we want in our lyrics. Some kind of surprise, but not cringe or not cliché. Or [111:56] something truly novel in the lyrics. [112:00] But that- if that's the case, it's kind of sad that [112:08] that's where the creativity has to come from, but not from the music. [112:12] Because then if we can create very realistic [112:15] music that sounds really damn good, where's the role of the musician there? [112:21] - I think the role of the musician is that in [112:24] actually... If they use AI to assist them [112:28] in coming up with ideas, they could as a creation tool. Then the musician... [112:32] Like, some of the stuff is just not high quality sonically, high quality. [112:36] So, the musician goes in and redoes stuff and changes [112:40] things and adds parts, and then they actually do music production, [112:44] and maybe they re-sing the parts, and they change the stuff. And then then it's just [112:48] basically like an idea generator, and I think that that's a great use of [112:52] AI, is for that. [112:54] - But see, if you do that, [112:57] does it make you sad that you don't necessarily need to learn instruments? [113:01] So, basically, you can... I mean, you can think of it as a different [113:05] kind of instrument, but you can write lyrics. [113:09] You can hum the melody. You can just hum parts. [113:13] You know? And then and then do A, B kind of thing. Just kind of [113:17] rhythm this kind of, and stitch them together. And never actually have [113:21] your fingers on a guitar or- or fingers on a drumstick. [113:25] - That's why I'm not gonna use AI, Lex, is for that reason, because [113:31] to me, it's just boring. And I- [113:33] - Yeah, it is [113:33] - ... when I use it, it's just like, "Eh." But I used it for [113:37] about a month or so, just because I was making videos. [113:40] And I was trying to see how it's advancing. Every- every three or four months, I'll- [113:43] I'll sit down, and I'll see whatever new versions they have. [113:47] And I'll write some songs. Write some songs. I'll prompt some songs [113:51] and see what they come up with and see if they're improving on the things. But [113:54] ultimately, I don't find it interesting to- to use. [113:58] - I hear you. You're a bit old school. [114:02] - I'm old school. [114:02] - As am I. I'm trying to think about the future, and I think [114:07] it's still, even in the future, also going to be boring. I think there's something- [114:10] - I agree [114:10] - ... fundamentally boring about it, and I've been trying to figure it out. For- so for example, [114:14] I use it a lot for- more and more and more for programming. So, for [114:18] building stuff. And there, it's not about the... The final [114:22] output is not the code. The output is what the code creates. And there, it's [114:30] extremely useful, not... It doesn't matter if it's boring or not, it's useful. But when the [114:34] final output is the thing that AI creates, which it would be in- in [114:37] music, then there's something about us that just, like... [114:41] We know. We- there is something boring about it. [114:45] - Yes. [114:46] - We want to celebrate and see the thing that's hard to create. And [114:50] if AI can just text a song, "Generate a top 10 [114:53] hit," we- we- we'll quickly lose value for that, I think. And so, we'll want [115:00] raw, like raw. Whatever- whatever shape that [115:04] raw takes, I want to say raw talent, but that raw [115:08] talent of any kind. And per- perhaps... It would make me a little [115:12] bit sad, but that's also awesome. Perhaps the [115:16] new kind of raw talent that civilization is asking for is how to make great [115:23] TikToks. Maybe that's what raw talent looks like. [115:28] It makes me a little bit sad because I'm a huge fan of long-form. [115:33] Uh, but that also... Creating TikToks is also talent. [115:38] - It's a- it is a talent. Absolutely. When I see anything that's AI [115:42] generated, I instantly recognize it. Any video, I'm like, "Ugh, boring, [115:46] boring, boring." And my kids do the same thing. They just have no interest in [115:49] engaging with it. As soon as they recognize it, and they can spot it a mile away- [115:54] ... and they're just like boring, boring, boring, boring, boring. [115:57] And then they kind of dis- then they don't even wanna engage with the [116:01] social media platforms, which is a danger. Which [116:05] I think they need to crack down on the AI slop. YouTube's done a pretty good job [116:09] on it, but it's hard to stay on this. It's [116:14] it gets flooded with so much of this stuff, it's so easy to [116:18] create and put up there. And to just be in the, [116:22] In the whack-a-mole thing where you're just trying to get rid of it all is a- [116:27] - Yeah, it's fundamentally like, it's fundamentally boring. I think boring is a really [116:31] good- [116:31] - Yes, boring. [116:32] - And it's, and it's annoying to have to flip through the AI slop. [116:38] But I think actually, as a civilization, it's just inspiring for authenticity [116:42] 'cause you wanna be real. And being raw, which I, you know, one of [116:46] the things I like about podcasts is people just shooting shit and just being [116:50] themselves in, in the long form versus overproduced. 'Cause I [116:53] think AI is making people realize that AI is good at being overproduced. [116:59] So there'll be more. [117:00] - Let's get that covered. [117:02] - Yeah. Even artists, 'cause you're saying like, yeah, they'll use it as tools. Part of [117:05] me thinks like not really. Like, I think they'll quickly, this [117:11] kind of process of generating a bunch of different options, [117:15] And choosing the one you like the most, I think is a really [117:19] frustrating process for artists. And it, I think it, I [117:23] think AI will definitely be used extremely effectively as a very fine-grained [117:32] tool in the image domain, it's editing images. But not like [117:39] macro editing, but very specific kinda editing that Photoshop [117:43] is increasingly integrated in. Uh, I'll mention to you offline, so the [117:46] whole uh, iZotope RX group of software that does a lot of the de-noising, [117:54] All the D, removing the wind, all the, they integrate machine learning [117:58] extremely effectively- [118:00] ... for working with audio in different kinds of ways. There's a bunch of different other [118:03] programs that do that. Maybe for like B-roll footage [118:09] and a, same thing on the audio, if you just need a little audio to [118:13] create a feeling of a scene, the AI might be used [118:17] there in that kinda way. But truly original stuff, eh. [118:20] - I've saved videos where I'm doing, speaking over music, for [118:24] example, in an interview. Somebody's playing and, and we have two [118:28] dialogue- two people speaking in lavs, but it's, but there's so much [118:32] bleed coming from the person playing- [118:34] ... that you can't hear what we're saying. And then we'll split out the voice for that [118:37] section, the two voices, separate them- [118:40] ... and then take the music and separate that stuff in. So it's really helpful for [118:43] things like that. [118:46] - And now, once again, quick 30-second thank you to our sponsors. Check them [118:49] out in the description. It really is the best way to support this podcast. Go [118:53] to lexfridman.com/sponsors. We [118:57] got UPLIFT Desk for my favorite office desks, BetterHelp for mental [119:01] health, Element for electrolytes, Fin for customer service AI [119:04] agents, Shopify for selling stuff online, and [119:08] Perplexity for curiosity-driven knowledge exploration. Choose wisely, my friends. And [119:14] now, back to my conversation with Rick Beato. So [119:20] you have this video breaking down Sabrina Carpenter's song Manchild. [119:24] And you use that as an example of [119:28] building up people's intuition about the music business [119:32] and how the music production for these [119:35] popular songs is being done these days. Who's doing the songwriting, [119:39] how's it being done and all that kind of stuff. I was wondering if you could [119:43] speak to that. [119:45] - In that particular song, Jack Antonoff, who is one of the writers, [119:48] Amy Allen, Sabrina Carpenter, said in some awards thing that there's an [119:52] old guy on YouTube that says that Sabrina had very [119:56] little to do with the song. And so he said in this clip- [120:00] - You being the old guy. [120:01] - Me being the old guy. That, well, Sabrina really was the—she's [120:04] amazing and she's the one that wrote everything in the song. It's like, so [120:09] my response is like, "Well, why are you guys even included on the songwriting then?" [120:14] - So one of the things you highlight is a lot of people are included on the [120:18] list of songwriters. [120:21] - Yeah, 10 people- ... 11 people. I mean, you know. Like, why does Song of the [120:27] Year have songs that are interpolations, meaning that they [120:30] have melodies from other songs in their interpolation? They [120:34] used to call it stealing. And then you [120:38] have songs that used samples for the whole thing. Like the Doechii song that's [120:42] out right now. And I said, "Look, she took a Gotye song and [120:47] basically took off his melody and she created her own melody over [120:51] it." It's like, well, it's, I mean, it saves time for her. You don't have to actually create [120:55] a track, you just can sing over someone else's song that was already successful. [120:59] - Yeah, you pointing that out, the song Anxiety, it broke my brain. [121:03] - I mean, it's so absurd. [121:05] - It, yeah, it just feels unfair. It feels, it's a good [121:08] song, but it was also a good song before, and it was, [121:12] before that, it was also a good song. [121:14] - Right, 2011, or Luiz Bonfá in 1967. So [121:21] why is that considered to be in the top songs of [121:25] the year? It's like, come on, you can't find another song that's not based on [121:28] that? That's ridiculous. And Doechii has some really good songs- ... on her record. [121:36] - Yeah, but why are these the ones that are coming to the top, right? [121:38] - Well, you know. [121:39] - This is interesting. Hey, that might be just a criticism of the machinery [121:43] of the business- [121:43] - Absolutely [121:44] - ... that drives them. It's not necessarily, like, a [121:48] lot of these folks are really good musicians. [121:53] First of all, I think a lot of them are also good, like the actual songs they [121:57] make at the top are good. I'm a big fan of Bruno [122:00] Mars. He's a great songwriter.... and is a great musician all around. [122:04] - Absolutely. [122:05] - You know, is a Michael Jackson, eh, reincarnated. I mean, he's- [122:08] - Super, super talented guy. [122:09] - Incredible, right? [122:10] - Yes. [122:11] - Um, you mentioned Billie Eilish and her brother write a lot of the songs. [122:14] - So good. Yeah, super talented. [122:17] - I mean, Taylor Swift is unlike anything. I mean, that's a historic figure in music, [122:23] but she's a fundamentally, at least originally, a singer-songwriter. [122:27] - Yes. [122:27] - So that's a, I mean, that, I mean, I'm sorry, but that, that is a, like, [122:31] of the kind of music that Rick Beato gives props to. She's the, she carries [122:40] the flame forward. [122:41] - She works on her own songs, absolutely, and she, but she never has more than [122:45] two co-writers on things. [122:47] - Wanna take a quick bathroom break? [122:49] Okay. I have to ask you about this complexity that you're facing on a [122:53] basically daily basis. I think it's a challenge a lot of [122:59] YouTube folks experience, but you're just so viscerally experiencing [123:03] it because a lot of what you do in your channel is celebrate music, [123:07] broadly. And so, as part of that process, you have to sometimes show [123:10] clips of music, and I think all of that falls under fair use, quite [123:14] obviously. And so you get all these YouTube copyright [123:18] claims, and for folks who don't know, if you get three, [123:22] three of those, it's each one of those can be a strike on the [123:26] channel and could take down your channel. And you get some insane [123:30] amount. You said you got, like I think I had a similar thing [123:34] on my Rick Rubin episode, like, I think you said 13. [123:39] 13. So, what, can you just speak to this whole thing? You've been in a constant [123:43] battle, WMG, UMG, all the, all, all- [123:48] - All the, all the three-letter name- [123:49] - All the- [123:50] - ... record labels, right? [123:51] - The, the music business people, so, what, what's the story there? [123:54] - Well, this has been going on since the beginning of my channel, and I've made videos [123:58] periodically. When I first started, it was just instant [124:02] blocks, so you never knew back in, I started, it'll be 10 years in [124:06] June. So, when I'd play music [124:10] in a video, YouTubers were not playing music in videos because they [124:13] didn't, because of the Content ID things and the take-downs and stuff. So, [124:17] I would play music, and I'd just see what happens, and then you get a content [124:21] ID claim, or you— or you realize the people were, quote, [124:25] unquote, "blockers," and I came up with that term that they would block your video, [124:29] take down your video. And I realized at first it was, [124:33] like, anything Guns N' Roses, which is still the case, Guns N' Roses, [124:37] AC/DC, I mean, many bands, Fleetwood Mac, um, Led Zeppelin, and then, [124:45] and then something happened. There was a guy on the [124:48] skateboard on TikTok that had the ocean spray thing and, and he was listening to- [124:54] ... Dreams by Fleetwood Mac. [124:56] And that blew up and became a number one song again. And the labels then [125:02] realized, I mean, I'd made many videos about, [125:06] about why this is wrong, and it should be fair use and everything. Well, because of that, [125:10] the label's like, "Ooh, maybe we should rethink this." And then they just started [125:14] demonetizing videos. [125:16] - Demonetized means they get all the money that you make. [125:17] - They get all the money. In a one-hour video, if they, if you use 20 seconds [125:21] of a clip- ... they get all the money. [125:25] Okay? So, I hired a lawyer finally after the Rick Rubin [125:31] video, 'cause I thought it was ridiculous. I go over to, [125:35] to Tuscany, I interview Rick at his house, and [125:41] I hired a— hired a lawyer to fight this, who I'm gonna have on my channel. I don't wanna say who [125:45] it is, but he's another YouTuber. [125:47] And he had approached me a couple years ago, and and it's not cheap to do. [125:53] - Oh, you, you're gonna do, like, a public interview with him? [125:55] - I'm gonna do an interview- ... with him, yes. [125:57] - Awesome. Okay. [125:57] - I talked to him today about it, actually. [125:58] - I can't wait. That'd be great. [126:00] - So he said, "You should fight these 'cause every single one of them [126:04] is fair use." And he went through my entire [126:08] catalog. I have 2,100 videos, and he's fought 4,000 Content ID claims and [126:16] won every single one of them. [126:19] 4,000. That's a lot— I mean, when I do top 20 guitar solos, there's 20 [126:26] Content ID claims, you know? It's, and it's either, it [126:29] can be either from the sound recording, if I used that, or if I just play [126:33] it, it can be from the publisher. [126:36] - That's amazing. So is there, I mean, that's- it's still, he's still a lawyer, still [126:43] work. Does that, is there a hopeful thing you can say about the future of- [126:49] - Yeah, fight these Content ID claims. If it's fair use, if you're not [126:53] just playing the song and listening to it, and, 'cause a lot of stuff that are reaction [126:57] videos, or whatever, that are not, where they play the whole song, I mean, I'm using these [127:01] things, and I'm talking, lot of the times it's in interviews, or it's [127:05] in, I'm breaking down a solo, and there's a- [127:08] - Yeah. See, that's an- [127:09] - ... you know [127:09] - ... obvious one, but even reaction videos, right? Where those- [127:12] - Yeah. Even reaction videos, yes, absolutely. [127:14] - Uh those are more borderline. But I don't know. I love those videos. [127:20] - Absolutely. [127:21] - Like, when a person's just sitting there and listening to it, and they're like, you know, like, a, like, [127:25] a voice teacher is listening to a vocal performance, and like- [127:29] - Yeah, but those are breakdowns. [127:31] - Yeah, those are breakdowns, yeah. [127:32] - I think that the Content ID stuff that was happening with these major [127:35] labels, they would hire third parties- ... that would go out, use AI, and go and [127:43] anytime they detect anything, they always go to the biggest channels first to get the most views, makes [127:47] sense and stuff. [127:48] - Yeah. Yeah. [127:48] - And, and they would claim everything that they could, and historically, YouTubers never [127:52] would fight back. They were like, "Oh, this is easy money." [127:55] YouTubers never fight back and, at these [127:59] things, because they're afraid to have their channels taken down. So- [128:03] - Right, you gotta say, "Hold my beer." [128:05] - There you go. [128:06] - So, I mean, it's important. So, you- [128:07] - I mean, it took me years though, Lex. I didn't... I've been doing this... So, I've been [128:11] doing it for one year now, and I'm nine year- almost 10 years into my [128:15] channel. So, it took me that long. [128:17] - I mean, hopefully, there's a ripple effect also. It's not just [128:21] your situation. Hopefully, you don't have to deal with this for much longer. [128:27] Um, how has Spotify changed music? Sometimes we highlight the fact [128:31] that they changed the nature of music and that it's the scarcity is [128:35] not there. But also, a lot of it's like every [128:39] kind of music is available and so fast and it's so easy. It's easy to explore. [128:43] - It's a commodity. It's like turning on a water faucet. [128:47] - Do you think- [128:47] - Once you get going- [128:48] - ... that there's some good to... I mean, there's a lot of good to that, right? [128:52] Uh, well, have you... Did you go through that whole pro- I still remember [128:57] where I had to basically throw away the albums. [129:00] - I never did that. When, after you uploaded them into your computer? [129:06] - Yeah. So, there's that two-step process. One, there's [129:10] like the hard albums, CDs for me. [129:14] And then, and then you upload them into your computer. [129:17] And you save them. And then you, how do you put it? [129:24] Allegedly, a friend of yours pirates some extra songs. [129:29] And puts them on the computer. So, you have your stash on the [129:33] computer. You're like, "This is my finely selected [129:36] stash of greatness." Uh, sometimes organized by album, sometimes [129:40] not. And the big moment for me that was [129:44] really difficult to do, really difficult to do, is throw away that stash. [129:49] Bec- and switch to Spotify. [129:52] Switch to streaming, and basically, rebuild the stash of [129:56] playlists and all this kind of stuff. And that, it was heartbreaking [129:59] 'cause so much love and effort went into that. Both the [130:03] CD, the stashing of the CD, and the [130:06] stashing of the MP3s in the computer. And then in [130:10] Spotify, it just seems just effortless. But [130:14] it helped me discover all kinds of artists I never would have discovered otherwise. [130:18] And Pandora, I used a lot. Pandora is more uh, prioritizing on the [130:25] discovery part versus organization part. And that was really wonderful. [130:30] - So, one of the things I... I'll start with a positive that I like about Spotify, is [130:34] that they show view count, they show play counts. Whether they're real [130:38] or not, that's another question. But they show how many [130:41] plays songs have, and that's how the charts are based. [130:45] - Does that give you signal that something is listened to a billion times? Does that [130:49] mean something to you? [130:50] - Yeah. It means that, that it's a popular song. Well, that's a massive hit. There's very few [130:54] songs that have a billion, billion plays. Now, the [130:57] downside of Spotify is the way that they pay their artists. Now they've lumped in [131:03] podcasts with that are getting a cut of this streaming with the music. Um, and [131:14] you know, the search and discovery. I mean, there's benefits of [131:18] algorithms and there's negative things of algorithms. Algorithms happen to [131:22] kind of a lot, many times, pigeonhole people into [131:26] listening to the same genre of music all the time, and not expanding their, [131:33] you know, the discovery of new music. Where [131:37] that you might hear on the radio back in the day where program directors [131:41] would play things that they liked, right? And you might hear something, "Oh, what is that?" "Oh, [131:45] that's a new Soundgarden record," or so- you know, like, "Whoa, I [131:49] like that. I'm gonna go by- check that out." You know, something you might not have heard or something [131:53] odd. [131:55] - Like, one thing I really love doing on Spotify is you can have radio. [132:00] Meaning, like, you have a few... It's similar to Pandora, like you can... [132:06] Okay, this is gonna reveal a little too much about myself. But usually [132:10] when I go work out, I'll listen to something like Rage Against the Machine radio. [132:16] I'm sorry, I need- [132:17] - What else would you listen to? [132:18] - I need motivation. Classical music? I don't know. [132:22] But yeah, it's pretty good 'cause it recommends a bunch of other stuff I wouldn't even [132:26] know. Some of it I know, obviously, but akin to [132:30] the, similar to the Rage Against the Machine-y type thing. [132:34] It recommends a bunch of artists, and it's like, "Oh, holy shit, that's awesome." So, I don't [132:37] know. That discovery works really well. So, some of it is the technology [132:41] thing. Um, but that experience was fundamentally more [132:47] vibrant than I had previously with my stash. That I would just [132:51] keep a stash, and I would listen to the same record over and over and over and over. [132:56] But yeah, this, what's lost is the [132:59] I'm sure you love this, but listening through the Led [133:03] Zeppelin records, just driving in a car and listening to the [133:07] whole thing all the way through. Yeah, that's lost. [133:10] - So, I have my old iTunes libraries from 2005- [133:14] - Oh, nice [133:14] - ... that I list- that I, that I've saved. The CDs that I uploaded into my computer. [133:21] Anytime I play songs on my... When I'm doing interview, I always play WAV [133:29] files, I put them in. And it's funny that when I interview a [133:33] mixer, I interviewed this mixing engineer, Andy Wallace, [133:36] and people comment, "Wow, that song sounded amazing." [133:40] song sounded amazing." And you go, "Well, not only are they great mixes that he did, [133:44] but I'm using WAV files in there." And people notice [133:48] the, and these are WAV files from, [133:51] from, you know, original encoding. Not remastered things that Spotify keeps doing- [133:56] ... and adding a bunch more top end and things like that. That these are the- [134:00] - Oh, I see [134:00] - ... these are actually the original WAV files from [134:04] off the CD that I ripped-... 20 years ago. [134:09] - What's your current... And people are really curious about that, so what's your current [134:12] stack? What are the tools you use? What's your DAW? What's the audio interface? What [134:17] are the mics? [134:17] - So I use Pro Tools. [134:19] - Pro Tools stuff. [134:20] - For the most part, but I also use Logic- [134:22] ... And Ableton. I've got all, I've got all those. [134:25] - So you're mostly on a Mac? [134:26] - I'm only on a Mac. [134:28] - Only on a Mac. [134:28] - Only on a Mac. [134:29] - I'm only the opposite. [134:31] - Although we have multiple PCs, 'cause my kids use PCs. [134:35] - Yeah, just to rebel. [134:37] - They do it for gaming. They like to game. [134:38] - Right, that's true. I, but like in terms of editing, I hate how how good Mac is- [134:45] - So good [134:46] - ... at just integrating. The hardware and the software just work well together. [134:49] Both on the video en- [134:50] - If I didn't have a Mac on, honestly, I wouldn't be talking to you right [134:53] now. Because I got a G3 that's... So the only good thing that a [134:57] major label did for me is when, when my band was on [135:00] UMG and they bought me a G3 and an SM7 and Pro [135:07] Tools Digi 001, the first prosumer Pro Tools [135:11] thing. And I learned how to use Pro Tools, and that allowed me to [135:15] learn how to edit video and become a record producer. [135:19] So I gotta give it, give it to Mac for that. [135:22] - So Pro Tools, I mean, that's still the standard. [135:25] - That's kinda the industry standard, yeah. [135:27] - I gotta ask you 'cause I know... I've never used Pro Tools. I've [135:30] used... Again, I'm a caveman. I've [135:34] used REAPER, I've used Studio One, that's the most recent that I've used that. And- [135:38] ... for the most time I've used Ableton Live. I feel like I'm [135:41] using 1% of the power of the tool. [135:45] Like, Ableton Live makes me feel like I'm literally just pressing the record button. [135:51] - Ableton's amazing. It really is. [135:53] - It is. But I feel like the... It, I mean, it's designed for people that are [135:57] doing like all kinds of MIDI stuff, and like looping [136:01] and the, what is it? The push buttons with [136:05] the, with the beats. And the, it's, it's... I mean, I sound, I [136:09] sound really out of touch. But it's just the power is incredible. [136:13] Also, it's, I think it's not just for recording, it's also for live performances. [136:19] So this is why Studio One has been a little bit nicer for me, because it's [136:23] simpler, made for recording more so. [136:28] - Any DAW that you get used to, Lex, that's- [136:32] - Just use anything. [136:33] - ... using it, yeah. And- [136:35] ... you have to become a master at the things. If you wanna be a recording engineer or [136:38] producer, you, you become an expert. A lot of the... You know, Finneas and Billie [136:42] Eilish, I think that they use Logic, that's their DAW that they like to use. And [136:46] Logic, you know, a lot of pros use Logic. You know, I fire up [136:50] Logic every couple days and I use it for things. I have it on [136:54] my laptop here and I have Pro Tools and Logic on my laptop. I use [136:58] both. I use Pro Tools mostly though. [137:00] - But Pro Tools, that's where you feel like at home? [137:03] - Oh, yeah. I'm an expert in Pro Tools. [137:05] - Are you using any emulation? Any amp sims or it's all real amps? [137:12] - No, I use amp sims. On my laptop here when I travel and things like [137:16] that, I use Neural DSP, which I just did a video at their headquarters in Helsinki. [137:22] And their CEO, Doug Castro, is a friend of mine. [137:27] I actually talked to him today as a matter of fact. And I have a Kemper [137:33] amp sim, you know, a modeler. I have an [137:35] Axe-Fx, I've got a Helix, I pretty much have all these [137:39] things. But for me, I can... I have 100 amps in my [137:43] studio, so... And I have mics set up all the time, and cabinets, and stuff. [137:47] - Oh, what do you mean? [137:47] - I have 100 amplifiers. Real amplifiers. [137:49] - Real? Wait, sorry, 100? [137:52] - I have 100, yeah. About 100, maybe 95. [137:56] - How does one go get to that level? [138:01] - Collecting and being... I'll be 64 in April, so- [138:05] - So you just don't let go? [138:06] - I don't let go, no. [138:08] - Why would you get to 100? Like is it, is it tone difference, the- [138:12] - Yes, so everything- [138:13] - You know the tone difference? [138:13] - ... does one thing really well. And so it'd be like, okay, so I have this [138:20] Marshall JCM800 that's modded that does this [138:24] one thing. It's got great mids and it's good for this kind of a tune, so I [138:28] will pull that out. Then it's like, no, I need more of like a scooped metal sound [138:31] that's more like Metallica or Dream Theater or something, so, oh, I'm gonna pull [138:35] out my Mesa Boogie. Or I need something that's chimey that's more like Brian May or [138:43] like The Edge, I'm gonna pull out my Vox AC30. So everything and, and [138:50] that's, that's why I have so many amps, because they all do... Every [138:54] amp I have does one thing really well. If it doesn't do it well, I get rid of [138:57] it. And I'm down to 100. [139:01] - Down to 100. It's only 100. Uh, but it- [139:03] - I can get by with probably 75. [139:07] - Come on, but you, then you're really running the risk of not having just the right [139:11] amps. But you're using emulation, so that's great. I [139:15] mean, and that... But there's the other side of it which is the guitar. [139:20] I told you offline, I think having multiple guitars is cheating, but [139:23] whatever. No, nobody agrees with me on this. I only have like one... I do have [139:28] some side pieces but one main... The greatest gi- [139:33] - The Strat? What do you play? [139:33] - The Strat, yeah. [139:34] - The Strat, yeah. [139:34] - American Strat. I said I would never do this, but I was in a guitar store. [139:38] I live next to a guitar store in Cambridge, [139:42] and one day... I would always stop by, I don't know why. I just, just to look at the [139:46] guitars, like, and I don't really know why exactly, just to [139:50] be in the aura of these great instruments. And I— [139:53] they brought in this American Strat that had these [139:57] different shades of... It was like a silver. [140:02] And I just... I've never had this feeling. They talk about [140:06] love at first sight. I just fell in love with the [140:08] guitar. Can you just speak to the kind of guitars you have and you love? [140:13] - I pretty much have... mainly old school guitars, right? So I have [140:23] Gibsons, I have Fenders, I have PRS guitars. And then I have... I have [140:30] two Gibson acoustics. I have a 1957 Country [140:34] Western that I've had for probably 30 some odd years. It's a great guitar. [140:38] And I have a J-45 Gibson, and I have a Martin [140:42] D-28. So I only have three nice acoustics. And I have a [140:46] Guild 12-string, and I have a Guild [140:49] Nashville-tuned guitars. The low strings are up, up the octave, so [140:53] the E, A, and D and G are up the octave. That's Nashville tuning. [140:57] Six-string though. Like, basically what David Gilmour plays on Comfortably [141:01] Numb in my video. He plays a Nashville tuning, but with one [141:05] variation. The low E is up two octaves. So [141:10] he demonstrates actually the... And this is how he [141:15] wrote Comfortably Numb. The chorus— [141:17] ... part of it was with this particular guitar that he's playing in the video. [141:21] - What can you say about, like, the different feels that the [141:25] guitars, the acoustics have? Like, what, how do you know which one to pull out? [141:31] - It depends on the kind of part that I'm playing. If I want something with really [141:35] tight mid-range, that doesn't have a lot of low [141:38] bass, this particular old Gibson that I have, the [141:42] 57, I will pull that out. It's got very balanced [141:46] strings and like, you know, mid-range. It doesn't have a lot, it doesn't have a booming [141:50] bottom end, booming low E string- [141:52] ... or anything or A string. So it depends on what, [141:56] what kind of sound I'm looking for. If I'm- [141:58] - So it's more about sound versus feel? [142:00] - Yeah. All my guitars play equally well. [142:03] I have them all set up to where they play well. [142:06] Um, I have a signature Gibson guitar that I've had for five years now. [142:13] - When you say Gibson, Gibson Les Paul? [142:15] - Gibson. It's a double cut Les Paul Special. Yeah, with P-90 pickups. [142:20] - I don't know what double cut means, but it sounds impressive. [142:22] - That means two cut, cut. Two, um- [142:25] As opposed to a Les Paul that has one cut. So it's a Les Paul Special that has [142:29] two. I have it over there. My signature guitar. [142:32] - That's the- That's the... All right, nice. [142:33] - Yeah. When you play this, you're gonna be like, "Oh my God, this is butter." [142:37] - Now, I'm again, I said it's cheating. I don't- [142:40] - And what amp do you play through? [142:42] Do you play through an amp sim, or do you have... What do you have, like a- [142:45] - This is gonna be embar... Yeah. I use BIAS FX. I'm sorry. [142:50] - Lex, I use amp sims too, so... I just got the new John [142:54] Mayer Neural DSP plugin today that I have not tried out. [142:58] He did a modeling of all his amplifiers that, that- [143:01] ... that Neural DSP did. And it sounds great. John played it, it [143:05] sounds just like his amps. [143:07] - Yeah, John is incredible. [143:08] - John's great. [143:08] - I've been fortunate enough to have dinner with him two [143:11] times. And outside of being an incredible musician, he's also conversationally just- [143:17] - Yes. I've known John since he lived in Atlanta but, [143:21] when he got signed, and I knew John from way back then, right in the early 2000s. [143:26] - I think he doesn't get enough credit. Like, he's one of the greatest living [143:31] guitarists- [143:31] - He's a fantastic guitar player [143:33] - ... in the world. [143:33] - Absolutely. [143:34] - And a celebrator, if that's a word, of great guitar playing. [143:39] - Absolutely. [143:40] - By way of advice, you started your YouTube [143:44] channel in your mid-50s and found incredible [143:48] success. You've had essentially multiple [143:51] careers. Is there some wisdom you can extract from that? [143:56] - So my theory is that [144:01] somebody's gotta be successful, so why can't it be you? That was, that was... [144:09] That's, that was my... When I started my channel, I mean, I didn't start it to... It started by [144:12] accident with the Dylan video. And and really, so many people [144:16] reached out to me. I started it six months after that viral video. [144:21] So many people wrote to me, "Can you teach me this?" Pro musicians, [144:25] well-known ones that you would, who you'd know. "Can you teach me [144:28] this?" I can't teach you what Dylan did, but I [144:31] can, I can teach you relative pitch, develop your ear that [144:34] way. But then that, I had conservatories writing [144:38] to me about this stuff from all over the world. "How did you teach [144:42] Dylan this?" 'Cause we made about four different videos, and they got more and more [144:46] sophisticated. And so I thought, "Okay, I'll [144:50] make some YouTube videos and explain this stuff." This is, that's really why I started, so [144:54] I didn't have to keep... I couldn't answer the emails. There were so many of them, so I just started [144:58] making videos on how to train your ear and music theory. And that's really [145:02] how I started my channel, and my wife was like, "What are you doing?" I said, "I'm [145:06] making YouTube videos." "Why?" So I don't have to keep [145:10] telling people how I did this stuff. And then all of a sudden, you [145:13] know, few, I had 4,000 subscribers the first month, another [145:17] 4,000 then. Hit 100,000 after a year, and then six months [145:21] later, 200,000, then three months later, 300,000. So- [145:26] - I think there, one thing that should be said, [145:29] that in modern culture for young people, a lot of them will see YouTube and [145:33] TikTok and Instagram, [145:35] and they kinda wanna be famous. They wanna get the clicks and the [145:39] views and so on, and that's the thing they chase and optimize. I think [145:44] the thing that you're leaving unstated perhaps is that you spent many years [145:50] pursuing the mastery of a craft. And there's a lot of value [145:57] to getting good at something. [145:59] - Absolutely. [146:00] - Offline. You can actually reveal your journey [146:04] online, but the thing you're chasing is not Fame. It's getting good at [146:11] something. And I think actually what happens is even if the [146:15] thing you get good at-... is not the thing that [146:19] you become famous for if that's the thing you're that ends up [146:23] happening. It's still, like, getting good at one thing, kind of [146:27] somehow relates to getting good at another thing. Somehow they'll lead you to get [146:31] better at getting better at the next thing, at the next thing, and the next thing. [146:35] But if you're just chasing fame and trying to figure out, "How do I do the viral [146:39] thing?" Or so on, it just seems to... You might actually get there, but [146:43] it'll be unfulfilling and not long- lasting. [146:47] - My theory of my channel has always been, make videos on things [146:51] I'm interested in. And [146:53] at first, I thought, "Oh, nobody's going to watch an old white-haired guy on YouTube." [146:57] That was kind of my thing. Well, that was not correct. Um, and [147:05] then it's like, "Well, just make videos on stuff I'm interested in." It just so happens that other [147:09] people are interested in the same things I'm interested in. And keep learning. [147:13] And I, when I produced bands, I never let them take my picture, ever. I [147:17] never let them record me in the studio. There's virtually no pictures of [147:21] any band I ever produced. So from 1999 to 2015 when I, December 2015 when that Dylan [147:28] video came out, [147:30] no one took my picture. There were no pictures of me on the internet. [147:33] - You're fully behind the camera kind of guy- [147:35] - Yes [147:36] - ... meaning, like, no... [147:37] - No. No pictures. No pictures with [147:41] people. "Hey, can we take a picture?" I said, "No. No pictures with people." [147:44] - And now you're like- ... you're the talent. You're the face. [147:51] No, I mean, but the again, the thing you're leaving unstated there [147:54] is like you spent a lot of years, you know, teaching music. Like, really exploring [148:01] music. Trying a music career of like, trying to create, trying to [148:05] produce, trying to be a musician, and all these... Not just [148:09] trying. Like, being a, getting extremely good at [148:13] it. I just, I think in modern culture [148:16] there's a sense you want to sk- skip that part. "I wanna be famous. I wanna..." You know [148:20] this. And that is a thing that's not going to be in most cases effective as [148:28] a primary thing to chase. [148:31] - So I have an undergrad in classical bass. I have a master's from New [148:36] England Conservatory in jazz guitar. Then I taught college for... I taught jazz studies [148:40] for five years- ... from '87- [148:42] ... to '92. Then I got a publishing deal, my first publishing deal, in 1992- [148:47] ... with PolyGram Publishing. And then I became a producer when I was 37, [148:51] having no idea how to engineer, I taught myself engineering. And then [148:55] YouTube. I taught myself how to edit videos. [148:59] - And then you taught yourself how to interview. [149:01] - And I taught myself how to interview. I'd never done an interview before. I never was like, "An interviewer? [149:04] What?" [149:05] - You haven't just done that. You've taught yourself [149:08] not how to do just YouTube, but YouTube Shorts. Different- [149:12] - Totally different thing [149:13] - ... totally different thing. [149:13] - Totally different skill. [149:15] - And then not just YouTube, but like, how to be like a, [149:19] there's a, 'cause you're both a YouTuber [149:23] and like a musician who posts stuff on YouTube. YouTuber [149:27] means like you're thinking about stuff like thumbnails and... [149:31] - Which I make my own thumbnails. I've always made my own thumbnails. [149:35] - By the way, before I forget, I think I speak for the entirety of [149:39] the internet thanking you for how you introduce your videos and [149:43] how you close them. 'Cause you, this is a big part of YouTube, where [149:46] people have a 30-minute introduction to, to a five-minute [149:50] video. You just go straight in. That's really [149:54] wonderful. That's, I mean, on, on, on all fronts. I mean, I suppose that has to do with the [149:58] production skills that you have, of understanding, cutting, cutting the fluff. [150:02] - To make a song. [150:02] - Yep. Yeah, cutting, cutting the fluff, cutting the bullshit. I'll just get [150:06] straight to the core of the thing. I've heard you talk about maintaining friendships [150:10] for a long time. You said never waste a friendship. Can you elaborate on that? [150:15] - Yeah. That's one of my things is that I really value the time [150:19] I've spent with people, friendships and keeping in touch with people. I [150:24] talk to each one of my siblings multiple times a week. I talk to [150:28] my sisters probably every night, my two sisters. [150:31] Um, I have friends from college, I got friends from [150:35] growing up, I have friends from, you know, [150:38] both colleges I went to. I have friends from all different eras in my life [150:42] that I keep in touch with and visit whenever I can, and... [150:46] - And you must have met some incredible humans, and incredibly weird, and [150:50] interesting humans throughout your life. [150:54] So it's worth it, the effort to connect and reconnect. [150:59] - I mean, it's pretty much everything in life. Nothing means anything more [151:03] than the friendships that you make in your family. [151:06] - Yeah, what's the point of this whole thing, right? [151:07] - That's right. [151:09] - What's the role of music in in the human experience? [151:14] - Well, hopefully to enlighten people and to create the soundtrack of their life. [151:20] - It is, right? Music, music does something. I'll get... Sometimes when [151:26] I'm alone I'll listen to a song, and there's nothing quite like a song [151:33] that makes me truly feel, like feel alive. And whatever that is. [151:37] Sadness, or hope, or excitement. Or, [151:42] When I'm working out, listening to Rage Against the [151:46] Machine, like protest. Or as I was [151:50] listening to the Metallica, the, I was relistening to the set [151:54] that they played in, in Moscow, just [151:57] hyped. Like truly hyped. I was like pacing listening to it. [152:02] And there's nothing like that. [152:05] - I've never found anything. [152:06] - And I don't know what that is in the human psyche that's that, but I'm so glad [152:10] we found it. We humans created instruments that can vibrate strings and together [152:18] create harmonies and melodies, and [152:22] ones that reverberate through generations and they carry that. [152:27] - It's one of the greatest things that humans ever did, creating music. [152:31] - And all of that led up to you, some guy [152:35] being listened to by millions of people on the internet. [152:41] This is all a simulation, Rick. And I've been a fan of yours for a long time, like I [152:45] told you. This is crazy to meet you. [152:48] - Same, Lex. [152:49] - Thank you for everything you do for the world, for celebrating [152:52] music. For helping us discover and [152:55] rediscover some of the incredible musicians and songs that [152:59] have been created over the decade, over the [153:02] centuries. Thank you for being who you are and thank you for talking to me. [153:07] - Thanks, I appreciate it. [153:09] - Thanks for listening to this conversation with Rick Beato. To support this podcast, please check [153:13] out our sponsors in the description where you can also [153:16] find links to contact me, ask questions, give feedback, and so [153:20] on. And now, let me leave you with some words from [153:24] Friedrich Nietzsche, as I often do. "Without music, life would be a [153:31] mistake." Thank you for listening, and I hope to see you next time.