Barrett Lyon Deploys Owned-Metal Mesh to Bypass Cloud Intermediaries

Rebuilding the Internet for Privacy | Barrett Lyon on DoxxNet — Joel de la Garza, Barrett Lyon

Joel de la Garza, Barrett Lyon

Encrypted communications remain vulnerable to automated AI surveillance unless networks eliminate intermediate application servers by owning physical infrastructure and routing traffic directly peer-to-peer.

AI-assisted summary of Rebuilding the Internet for Privacy | Barrett Lyon on DoxxNet — original source. Check the original for full context.

Source published:

Key ideas

  • Barrett Lyon created DoxxNet to rebuild consumer networking from the physical hardware up, deploying 26 redundantly routed global sites in roughly six months with a 12-person team and zero sysadmins. (21:28)
  • Unlike centralized messaging apps like Signal and WhatsApp that route and store traffic through intermediary servers, DoxxNet uses an API-driven parallel mesh where user devices communicate directly peer-to-peer with three to four layers of post-quantum encryption. (14:40)
  • Lyon argues that traditional commercial VPNs merely lease third-party bare metal and act as centralized proxies, warning that foreign infrastructure providers and organized crime often compromise data privacy behind 'no-logs' claims. (20:00)
  • The operational stack relies on proprietary, self-hosted local AI agents for monitoring and automation, sharing zero telemetry, prompts, or inference metadata with mega-cap commercial AI providers. (21:28)

Detailed notes

## Background Published on October 1, 2026, as an audio podcast hosted by Joel de la Garza and featuring guest Barrett Lyon, this episode examines what it will take to rebuild internet architecture around privacy, direct communication, and reduced reliance on centralized intermediaries. The discussion focuses on Lyon's project DoxxNet, addressing why traditional VPNs fall short, how tracking data is increasingly exploited by scalable AI, and how DoxxNet utilizes an owned bare-metal mesh network with localized AI operations.

## TL;DR Barrett Lyon argues that modern digital communications have stagnated under centralized intermediaries, carrier-grade NAT, and pervasive ad tracking that is now easily weaponized by scalable artificial intelligence. To solve this, Lyon built DoxxNet as an independent, programmable mesh network that enables true peer-to-peer messaging, file sharing, and calling on privately owned bare-metal infrastructure without third-party server exposure. Lyon also reflects on his engineering past, recounting a harrowing in-flight mechanical failure, his pioneering work founding Prolexic and fighting cyber extortionists, and creating internet topology maps now housed in the Museum of Modern Art.

## Atmosphere & style The conversation carries the casual, evocative intimacy of two seasoned cybersecurity veterans sharing war stories and philosophical reflections over a lifetime of infrastructure battles. The mood oscillates between lighthearted geek humor—such as laser tripwire experiments and Burning Man art cars—and gripping, tense narratives about mid-air engine failures and narrowly escaping Russian organized crime rings. Listening feels like sitting in on an insider debrief that balances sober critiques of corporate surveillance with infectious optimism about rebuilding the open, exploratory spirit of the early web.

## Bulletin - `21:28` Barrett Lyon created DoxxNet to rebuild consumer networking from the physical hardware up, deploying 26 redundantly routed global sites in roughly six months with a 12-person team and zero sysadmins. - `14:40` Unlike centralized messaging apps like Signal and WhatsApp that route and store traffic through intermediary servers, DoxxNet uses an API-driven parallel mesh where user devices communicate directly peer-to-peer with three to four layers of post-quantum encryption. - `20:00` Lyon argues that traditional commercial VPNs merely lease third-party bare metal and act as centralized proxies, warning that foreign infrastructure providers and organized crime often compromise data privacy behind 'no-logs' claims. - `21:28` The operational stack relies on proprietary, self-hosted local AI agents for monitoring and automation, sharing zero telemetry, prompts, or inference metadata with mega-cap commercial AI providers.

## Key takeaways - `00:00` Centralized consumer messaging apps like WhatsApp, Signal, and Telegram create the illusion of direct communication while routing all traffic and metadata through central intermediary servers. - `00:00` Pervasive ad-tech tracking combined with scalable, 'coin-operated intelligence' allows cheap LLMs to aggregate disparate telemetry data and construct detailed behavioral profiles of users. - `07:28` Carrier-Grade NAT (CGNAT) and middlebox routing hacks have largely crippled the internet's original peer-to-peer potential, forcing devices to depend on intermediary servers to negotiate connections. - `10:00` Policymakers and automated filtering services frequently treat IP addresses as digital identity, leading to blunt over-enforcement and accidental regional blackouts, such as Cisco Umbrella severing a misclassified carrier. - `12:35` Traditional consumer VPNs provide only rudimentary IP obfuscation over rented servers, whereas DoxxNet operates an independent, programmable parallel mesh network with dynamic routing and policy management. - `14:40` DoxxNet implements transparent public key infrastructure underneath standard user interactions, converting user devices into direct servers to enable multi-gigabyte transfers at line speed without third-party storage. - `17:28` Free VPNs and obscure shell-company privacy providers frequently act as honeypots or covert data-harvesting pipelines, underscoring the rule that users become the product when a service is free. - `20:00` True privacy policy enforcement requires ownership down to the physical bare metal and carrier interconnects, as leasing servers cedes operational control to third parties and host jurisdictions. - `21:28` Operating with local, self-hosted AI rather than a large team of human administrators drastically reduces insider-threat risk by eliminating broad administrative credential access. - `24:15` Public backlash against data center power and water consumption is largely fueled by manufactured online panic; modern facilities are closed-loop, quiet concrete structures that bring economic value to host communities. - `28:07` Blocking non-essential telemetry endpoints like dit.whatsapp.net does not break application functionality, exposing how tech platforms gather behavioral diagnostics purely for persistent tracking. - `31:37` Early DDoS extortion schemes against e-commerce and gambling sites led Lyon to invent cloud scrubbing architectures through Prolexic and Defense.Net, shifting the cost curve against attackers. - `35:28` Automating active reconnaissance techniques during penetration tests led Lyon to create The Opte Project, producing visualizations of global internet topology that entered MoMA's permanent collection. - `40:00` Early cyber defense investigations against Russian extortion rings revealed that online denial-of-service attacks were often run as secondary operations by organized crime syndicates involved in narcotics and human trafficking. - `42:55` While Starlink satellite connectivity streamlines critical logistics and supply operations at Burning Man, ubiquitous suburban-style internet risks eroding the presence and immersion of communal experiences.

## Detailed walkthrough ### `00:00` Centralized Intermediaries and the Stagnation of the Internet

Modern digital communication operates under the illusion of direct connection, but virtually all consumer traffic is routed through centralized third-party intermediaries. Applications such as WhatsApp, Signal, iMessage, and Telegram present an interface that looks like direct person-to-person messaging, yet every packet passes through central application servers whose ownership and surveillance vulnerability raise critical privacy concerns. At the same time, the broader internet is confronting an inflection point driven by what Barrett Lyon terms the arrival of scalable, “coin-operated intelligence,” where decades of accumulated tracking data can now be ingested and weaponized cheaply by advanced artificial intelligence models. Rather than continuing to innovate at the fundamental network layer, internet protocol design has largely ground to a halt, with modern platforms choosing to layer new applications over stale, centralized architectures.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Centralized Messaging vs Direct Mesh accDescr: Diagram contrasting how centralized messaging apps route traffic through servers versus direct peer-to-peer mesh networking.

subgraph Centralized["Traditional App Architecture"] UserA["Sender Device"] -->|"Encrypted Payload"| CentralServer["Central Server / Intermediary\n(Collects Metadata & Logs)"] CentralServer -->|"Relayed Payload"| UserB["Receiver Device"] end

subgraph DirectMesh["DoxxNet P2P Approach"] PeerA["Peer Device A"] <-->|"Transient Encrypted P2P Connection\n(No Server In Middle)"| PeerB["Peer Device B"] end ```

To break this reliance on intermediaries, Lyon created DoxxNet—a project designed to reconstruct internet infrastructure from the physical hardware up. Instead of depending on conventional virtual private networks (VPNs) or public cloud inference APIs that merely shift data exposure elsewhere, DoxxNet focuses on direct, transient peer communication without intermediary storage or centralized servers. Barrett Lyon emphasizes the root problem confronting digital communications today: “All of those applications disguise themselves as you sending something to somebody else. You're really sending something to a server. The question is like, okay, well, whose servers are those?”

---

`01:14` The Commuter Flight: An In-Flight Emergency over the Bay

Before turning his attention back to networking protocols, Barrett Lyon treated aviation as an everyday engineering solution to Northern California traffic. Long before remote work became normalized during the COVID-19 pandemic, Lyon’s daily commute from the Tahoe region down to the San Francisco Bay Area had deteriorated from a 15-minute drive into a grueling 45-minute slog. To eliminate the friction of ground transit, he earned his pilot’s license and turned a Cirrus single-engine aircraft into his primary commuter vehicle, accumulating over 1,300 flight hours.

Following a partner meeting at Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), Lyon departed San Carlos Airport to head back toward Tahoe. While climbing out over Oakland International Airport, his engine suddenly began sputtering. Initially suspecting water contamination in the fuel supply, he maintained his climb and successfully cleared the Class Bravo airspace boundaries. The moment he cleared the airspace, the aircraft suffered a complete loss of engine power.

Faced with a dead stick, Lyon immediately began scanning the terrain below for an survivable landing site, declared an in-flight emergency with air traffic control, and sent a brief note to his friends: “Hey, guys, I have an emergency. Love you.” Gliding without power, he initially aimed for an open field while debating whether to deploy the airframe's built-in Cirrus Airframe Parachute System (CAPS). He was acutely aware of the morbid paradox surrounding the Cirrus: while regarded as one of the safest general aviation aircraft ever engineered, it frequently registers fatal accidents because pilots hesitate to trigger the ballistic rocket parachute, which destroys the airframe upon deployment and impacts the ground hard on energy-absorbing seats. Spotting Buchanan Field Airport across the mountain ridge in Concord, Lyon opted to glide toward the runway rather than sacrifice the plane to an uncontrolled field touchdown.

---

`04:55` A Cascading Mechanical Failure and Leaving Aviation

Barrett Lyon touched down smoothly dead-stick at Buchanan Field, rolling off the runway directly into transient parking without injury or visible exterior damage. The psychological weight of the near-disaster only hit him when emergency services arrived on the scene. As an oversized airfield crash truck pulled up alongside the parked plane and an emergency responder stepped down to shake his hand, Lyon realized how close he had come to an unsurvivable accident:

> “The guy gets out of that, shakes my hand, and then that's when the fear hit me because I'm like, oh, no. It's the guy scraping my brains off. This is the guy that puts the fire out. That was close.”

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: Cascading Cirrus Engine Failure accDescr: Flowchart showing the three-stage cascading mechanical and electrical breakdown that caused the engine to fail.

subgraph Mechanical["Mechanical Breakdown"] V["Valve / Lever Snaps"] -->|"Sucked into Manifold"| I["Air Intake"] I -->|"Drops to Oil Pan"| C["Cylinders 3 & 6 Crushed"] end

subgraph Electrical["Electrical Breakdown"] C -->|"Induces Short Circuit"| E["Electronic Ignition Fails\n(Lost Primary Spark)"] E -->|"Simultaneous Backup Failure"| M["Magneto Fails at High RPM"] end

Mechanical --> Electrical ```

A subsequent mechanical inspection revealed an improbable triple-failure that had cascaded through the powertrain: - A mechanical valve lever broke loose and was sucked straight into the air intake manifold. - The debris dropped down to the oil pan and was crushed directly into cylinders three and six. - The resulting mechanical damage triggered an electrical short inside a newly installed electronic ignition system, completely killing primary spark to half the engine. - The independent mechanical backup magneto, which still functioned well enough at low idle to start the plane on the ground, failed completely under high flight RPMs.

Unwilling to tolerate that compounding level of mechanical risk on regular commutes, Lyon rented a car to complete his trip home that night. He later ferried the repaired Cirrus to Las Vegas, sold it, and resolved that any future aircraft he boarded would require fewer moving parts and professional pilot redundancy.

---

`06:05` The Origins of DoxxNet: From High School Shell Accounts to Protocol Stagnation

The motivation behind Lyon's latest company, DoxxNet, ties directly back to his earliest days in computing. In high school, using his teenage hacker handle “Doxx,” Lyon and a classmate founded the original incarnation of DoxxNet in the era before public cloud infrastructure existed. Renting physical server capacity, the pair ran a profitable business selling terminal shell accounts to a community of around 1,000 active users for $5 a month:

> “As a kid, my hacker name was Doxx. And then I started a business in high school with my high school friend called DoxxNet. It was before cloud, and we were renting server products... selling shell accounts for $5 a month, but we had a thousand users.”

Although Lyon shuttered the original operation after graduating from high school to pursue his professional engineering career, he maintained continuous ownership of the domain name.

In recent years, Lyon observed that the internet's protocol layer had frozen in place. Innovation largely abandoned low-level transport and routing protocols, opting instead to stack ever-more centralized web services and ad-supported trackers directly on top of legacy architecture. This protocol stagnation coincided with the aggressive normalization of internet censorship, pervasive corporate behavioral tracking, and the mass consumer adoption of commercial VPNs. Lyon realized that consumer VPNs serve merely as a superficial patch—routing traffic through a different centralized proxy rather than resolving the core architectural vulnerabilities of the network. He decided to revive DoxxNet as an alternative, privacy-preserving networking layer designed from scratch to defend users against malicious actors, foreign intelligence services, ad-tech tracking networks, and intrusive surveillance.

---

`07:28` The Death of Peer-to-Peer and the Curse of Carrier-Grade NAT

The modern internet has strayed radically from the philosophical vision of its early creators. The early network was championed by free-speech maximalists who envisioned a decentralized, resilient web of interconnected nodes capable of routing around censorship and facilitating open public discourse. Over time, that open topography became concentrated into centralized chokepoints. Lyon highlights how state-dominated telecommunications entities—such as state telecom infrastructure in authoritarian regimes like China—exploit centralized topology as an architectural chokehold to govern the flow of information and coerce the decision-making of entire populations.

Technologically, the edge of the network has never been more capable: consumer devices boast fast multi-core processing, gigabit bandwidth, and powerful local Wi-Fi radios that should theoretically enable robust mesh routing and direct peer-to-peer (P2P) transfers. However, that potential has been crippled by middlebox routing hacks, specifically Carrier-Grade NAT (CGNAT), which prevents end-user devices from directly addressing or connecting to one another without an intermediate server negotiating the exchange. Lyon identifies eliminating this artificial friction as the central technical objective of DoxxNet: “And kind of really one of the biggest stains of the entire internet is carrier grade NAT. It's just destroying applications' ability to do really cool stuff. And erasing that is kind of what I'm trying to go for.”

Joel de la Garza notes that the pressure to monitor, filter, and restrict internet communications is no longer exclusive to foreign autocracies like China or Russia; domestic state governments across the United States have steadily begun imposing strict know-your-customer (KYC) identity verification rules and digital access restrictions on internet services.

`10:00` The Flaws of Network-Level Censorship and Identity

Joel de la Garza and Barrett Lyon examine how internet censorship is quietly encroaching into the United States under the guise of content moderation, health restrictions, and age verification. Lyon points out that policymakers repeatedly make the architectural mistake of treating the network layer as an identity verification mechanism. Because the base internet protocols were never designed to identify who sits behind a screen, assigning regulatory enforcement to network operators results in blunt, broken outcomes. As Lyon puts it:

> “An IP address is not your driver's license.”

Lyon highlights how crude network-level enforcement causes massive collateral damage across the internet. He cites a recent incident where Cisco Umbrella broke connectivity for a major telecommunications carrier after misclassifying the carrier as located in France. France had issued a court order mandating the blocking of over one hundred piracy websites; in response, the filtering logic went “scorched earth” and effectively severed the French footprint, inadvertently catching the misclassified carrier in its blast radius. De la Garza concurs, noting that classification engines regularly fail nuance: an AI companionship and "e-spouse" startup his team evaluated was broadly blocked as adult content by half of the industry's classification engines despite hosting no untoward material. Lyon shares that DoxxNet faced a similar hurdle early on because the double-X in its name and similarity to "doxing" caused it to be automatically flagged by safety filters like Claude before the team cleared the issue through formal registration channels.

- **The IP Identity Mismatch:** Network infrastructure treats policy enforcement like a hammer hitting a nail, confusing a routing address with verifiable human identity. - **The Blast Radius of Geo-Blocking:** Oversimplified regional blocking rules applied by services like Cisco Umbrella can accidentally sever connectivity for entire carriers if geolocation metadata is off. - **Overzealous Filtering Heuristics:** Automated classification engines routinely flag legitimate services—from companionship chatbots to privacy platforms named DoxxNet—as illicit or adult material.

---

`12:35` Beyond Traditional VPNs: Building a Programmable Mesh Network

De la Garza frames the rise of privacy products as a direct response to this "creeping information totalitarianism," questioning why standard consumer virtual private networks (VPNs) no longer suffice. Lyon explains that traditional commercial VPNs offer an extremely rudimentary architecture: operators rent generic server slices from third-party data center landlords, install basic tunneling software, and route encrypted traffic through that single node to mask the user’s public IP address. While this provides an elementary obfuscation layer, it is fundamentally brittle and centralized.

In contrast, DoxxNet treats VPN protocols merely as an on-ramp into an entirely independent, API-driven parallel network. Lyon’s team has engineered a dynamic mesh architecture where nodes, routing paths, and policies can be spun up, configured, or dismantled programmatically within milliseconds. Within this mesh, users can register internal domains, lease mesh or public IP addresses, and enforce custom security policies programmatically via automated agents. Lyon explains that building this programmable substrate allows them to deploy peer-to-peer (P2P) communication services directly over the mesh:

> “Inside, we can create either, you can call it a walled garden or a parallel internet or wherever you want to call it, but we built an entire mesh network.”

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Centralized Relay vs DoxxNet P2P Mesh Architecture accDescr: Diagram contrasting traditional relay through a central server with DoxxNet direct peer-to-peer mesh.

subgraph Traditional["Traditional Centralized App Architecture"] UserA["Sender Device"] -->|"Upload payload"| CentralSrv["Central Application Server / Storage"] CentralSrv -->|"Download payload"| UserB["Recipient Device"] end

subgraph DoxxNet["DoxxNet Parallel Mesh Architecture"] MeshA["Sender Device (Acts as Server)"] <-->|"Point-to-Point Mesh Route (Post-Quantum 3-4 Layer Encryption)"| MeshB["Recipient Device"] end ```

---

`14:40` True Peer-to-Peer Communication and Invisible PKI

Addressing De la Garza’s traditional security assumption—that any device containing a battery or electrical current is vulnerable to surveillance—Lyon explains how DoxxNet enables secure, transient communication without maintaining centralized records. The onboarding process verifies human presence through a lightweight puzzle rather than phone numbers or email addresses, issuing the user a persistent yet rotatable token that can be wiped or replaced at will. When two users connect, the application avoids confusing cryptographic jargon: inviting a friend triggers an automated public key infrastructure (PKI) exchange beneath the user interface, establishing mutual cryptographic trust transparently.

Once trust is established, the devices communicate directly across the mesh without an intermediary server. Lyon contrasts this with standard encrypted messaging apps such as Signal, WhatsApp, iMessage, and Telegram—which he labels "creepy." In those centralized ecosystems, users do not send files directly to one another; they upload data to an intermediary cloud server, which subsequently notifies the recipient to pull it down. That centralized choke point restricts transfer speeds, exposes connection metadata, and caps file sizes. DoxxNet removes the intermediary entirely by converting each user's endpoint into a direct server to their peer:

> “It’s really no middle of man, no server in the middle, and your phone becomes a server to your friend.”

- **Invisible Cryptography:** Users exchange cryptographic certificates seamlessly under the guise of an ordinary "invite friend" prompt, bypassing complex PKI management. - **Uncapped Data Transfers:** Because data travels directly peer-to-peer across the private mesh without resting on a storage server, users can transfer massive files—such as 20-gigabyte archives—at line speed. - **Multi-Layered Security:** Connections run across three to four distinct layers of encryption, engineered to be post-quantum resilient.

---

`17:28` Corporate Governance and the Deception of Free VPNs

The discussion turns to the integrity of the broader privacy ecosystem, with De la Garza pointing out that many commercial and free VPN services operate as honeypots or covert surveillance pipelines. He references international law enforcement stings where criminal syndicates abandoned mainstream tools like Signal in favor of supposedly bespoke "unbreakable" encrypted devices and private apps, only to discover the platforms were covertly orchestrated operations run by the FBI and international police. On consumer app stores, dozens of free VPNs present similar risks by monetizing user surveillance. Lyon warns that zero-cost privacy tools are inherently predatory:

> “If you're not paying for it, you are the product.”

Lyon stresses that technical architecture must be backed by transparent corporate governance and clear legal jurisdictions. To insulate users from single-jurisdiction overreach and subpoena abuse, DoxxNet is split across corporate entities: a primary US company paired with a dedicated Swiss entity governing European operations, with similar regional separations planned internationally. Lyon criticizes the pervasive industry trend of shell companies operating VPNs with anonymous owners, concealed business models, and zero accountability. De la Garza adds that the immediate threats everyday users face are rarely sophisticated three-letter intelligence agencies like the NSA or CIA; rather, the real danger comes from lower-level adversaries and shady network operators, such as the rogue VPNs responsible for siphoning crypto credentials during early cryptocurrency market surges.

`20:00` Bare Metal as a Service and the VPN Underbelly

Joel de la Garza and Barrett Lyon discuss the murky reality behind commercial VPN operations abroad, where state intelligence apparatuses and organized crime frequently blend together. While many commercial VPN providers advertise strict “no-logs” privacy policies, users rarely understand who actually owns the underlying hardware. Barrett points out that if a brand leases its servers from foreign third parties, those third parties dictate what happens to the data regardless of the brand’s customer-facing marketing. Lyon realized that the only way to avoid the compromised "bare metal as a service" ecosystem was to construct DoxxNet’s hardware footprint from scratch across the globe.

As Lyon explains, control over privacy begins at the physical layer: “Learning about that has been difficult because I personally was not up to be building infrastructure all over the world as rapidly as I could. But I ended up realizing that that was, you know, if it's not your equipment, you can't set policy. It's just you can't.” Beyond the server cage itself, the next boundary is carrier interconnects, which required immense engineering effort to bypass leased infrastructure risks. Joel highlights that this end-to-end approach sets DoxxNet apart from competitors: they own the entire operational stack from application software down to the physical wire.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: DoxxNet Infrastructure Control Model accDescr: Diagram illustrating DoxxNet's full-stack ownership versus traditional leased VPN architecture.

subgraph Leased["Traditional VPN Model"] A["VPN Brand Marketing<br/>('No Logs' Policy)"] --> B["Leased Bare Metal<br/>(Third-Party Hosts)"] B --> C["Foreign Jurisdictions &<br/>Organized Crime / Intelligence"] end

subgraph Owned["DoxxNet Model"] D["Software Layer<br/>(Peer-to-Peer Routing)"] --> E["Private AI Agents<br/>(Local Automation)"] E --> F["Owned Physical Metal<br/>(26 Global Sites)"] F --> G["Direct Carrier Interconnects"] end ```

`21:28` Eliminating the Insider Threat with AI-Driven Network Operations

Joel recalls that Barrett was deeply skeptical of large third-party AI and inference providers when they first met, prompting Barrett to build a completely proprietary, self-hosted AI stack. Despite the acute global GPU shortage, power constraints, and rising anti-data center sentiment, DoxxNet deployed 26 redundant routing sites globally in roughly six months. Incredibly, the entire company consists of just 12 people and employs neither a traditional network administrator nor a systems administrator; automated AI systems handle the operational load while Barrett oversees them.

This lean operational model dramatically shrinks the corporate blast radius. While insider threats remain among the most devastating vectors for catastrophic cyber intrusions, DoxxNet eliminates that exposure by not having hundreds or thousands of employees with backend credentials. The AI agents run strictly inside a secure internal environment that never exports context, prompts, or telemetry back to mega-cap AI providers.

Physical security is monitored via AI-enabled cameras that trigger alarms on unauthorized motion. Barrett jokes that they even evaluated mounting tripwire lasers in their data center cages for a touch of cinematic flair: “I'm like, why not? It'd be kind of fun. You've got to have the one data center that you take people to to impress them, right? Like the Switch data centers in Las Vegas. They've got the Jeeps with the.50 cal machine guns on them.” They acquired light-actuated switches to trip alarms if the beams were broken, but the plan foundered on an unglamorous technical reality: data center lights stay on continuously, and cleanrooms lack the floating dust or particulates needed to make laser beams visible without blowing forbidden smoke into the facility.

- DoxxNet maintains 26 globally distributed, redundantly routed sites built in approximately six months. - The company operates with a headcount of only 12 people, relying on proprietary local AI rather than dedicated sysadmins or network engineers. - Zero inference or routing metadata is shared with external commercial AI providers.

`24:15` Dispelling Data Center Myths and Manufactured Panic

The conversation turns to the mounting public backlash against data centers, which Barrett and Joel view as fueled by rampant disinformation. Mainstream media reports and viral videos frequently depict data centers as destructive entities that guzzle entire municipal water reserves and emit unbearable shrieks into surrounding communities. Barrett finds the hysteria absurd, noting that data centers are closed-loop systems that operate quietly, with sounds contained entirely inside the facility walls; videos purporting to show loud exterior noise often splice in dubbed indoor recordings.

Joel ranks data centers alongside commercial airliners as the most sophisticated machines humanity has ever constructed, while Barrett observes that from the outside, they are simply boring, quiet concrete buildings surrounded by parking lots. When Joel asks if Barrett has ever encountered protesters during his recent visits to over twenty data centers, Barrett laughs that he has seen nothing except bunny rabbits resting in the open grass fields around the massive data center parks in Northern Virginia.

Far from harming local populations, these hubs have turned host communities into some of the wealthiest counties in the United States, creating lucrative technical jobs and vastly improving local internet latency. Barrett addresses the rumor that data centers "drink water," pointing out that myths often arise from deliberate misinterpretations—such as the Switch facility near Reno, Nevada, which built an artificial lake purely as a reserve basin in the rare event that closed-loop chillers need to be drained and refilled. Lyon warns that public policy is being warped by cynical online narratives: “The future of our tech is needing to build this infrastructure now. And if we're crippling it, then we're making bad decisions. And we're making bad decisions on Instagram posts. Or TikTok.”

`28:07` Commercial Surveillance, Ad Trackers, and Bulk Profiling

Joel draws a parallel between public panic over intelligence agencies like the NSA and the far more pervasive, sophisticated tracking deployed every day by commercial advertisers. Intelligence agencies now routinely bypass legal search constraints by purchasing location and behavioral profiles directly from commercial data brokers. Barrett highlights how pervasive this tracking is inside everyday consumer hardware and applications: WhatsApp relies on endpoints like `dit.whatsapp.net`, and Apple constantly collects diagnostic metrics under the banner of "Apple telemetry." While tech companies frame these signals as harmless diagnostic metadata, they function in practice as persistent trackers. Lyon notes that blocking these telemetry endpoints breaks neither the apps nor the websites, proving they are non-essential for actual service delivery.

Barrett recalls a conversation with a wealthy, controversial figure who dismissed privacy concerns by asking what harm could possibly come from a corporation knowing he bought underwear on Target's website. Barrett argues that focusing on a single, isolated transaction misses the entire point of modern behavioral surveillance:

> “And then I'm like, well, it's not really that one. It's all of them on every different app that you're using or every different website. And it accumulates and then it's being stored by who knows who, where and being sold. And then when you aggregate all those data points together, you could know if you're a coffee drinker, what time you wake up in the morning, what your income is, where you shop, how often you purchase things. If you're preparing for the birth of a child or perhaps for a divorce or some other big life event. So turning that off doesn't bother me at all.”

`30:00` Reclaiming the Old Internet from Coin-Operated Intelligence

Barrett Lyon and Joel de la Garza discuss how consumer privacy has degraded under pervasive commercial surveillance and automated tracking. Lyon explains that stripping away tracking mechanisms is not just an application-level feature for DoxxNet, but a foundational network architecture goal intended to restore open creative connectivity without surveillance by advertisers or governments. De la Garza observes that the world has hit a major inflection point driven by scalable, automated machine learning models analyzing mass data exhaust. He characterizes this modern threat environment as “coin-operated intelligence at scale,” comparing it to infinite monkeys equipped with infinite typewriters capable of synthesizing mass telemetry.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Transition from Data Extraction to Agentic Peer Network accDescr: Pipeline showing mass telemetry dumped into LLMs contrasted against DoxxNet decentralized architecture.

subgraph Surveillance["Pervasive Tracking Model"] direction TB T["Ad Trackers & Mass Telemetry"] --> LLM["Coin-Operated LLM Analysis"] LLM --> Target["Automated Targeting & Mass Coordination"] end

subgraph DoxxNetModel["DoxxNet Architectural Countermeasure"] direction TB Mesh["Parallel Mesh Network"] --> Local["Deconstructed Tracking / Local AI"] Local --> Free["Unmonitored Peer-to-Peer & Agentic Network"] end ```

Lyon points out that feeding vast swaths of internet telemetry into large language models makes intrusive behavioral profiling trivially simple: “Yeah, you can take all that and just dump it into an LLM and say, tell me about this person.” He emphasizes that dismantling ad tracking would tangibly improve everyday life, noting that DoxxNet seeks to recreate the exploratory vibe of the early web while building out protocols that do not yet exist. When de la Garza remarks that the internet originally succeeded because it was free and thanks Lyon for trying to make it free again, Lyon jokes back, “Trying. But you have to pay me.”

- De la Garza and Lyon note that automated AI inference can orchestrate coordinated movements across platforms and run targeted intelligence against critical infrastructure and data centers. - Lyon argues that consumer web tools must deconstruct tracking entirely, replacing centralized surveillance silos with open environments for creative experimentation.

---

`31:37` From High School Defenses to Prolexic, Defense.Net, and Big Gravity

Reflecting on their shared history in the early 2000s security ecosystem, de la Garza recalls analyzing early distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) botnets like Stacheldraht, Tribe Flood Network (TFN), and TFN2K. Lyon traces his journey in DDoS mitigation straight back to the original DoxxNet servers he ran in high school. Facing constant attacks, he developed survival tricks, documented them in defensive guides, and presented his findings at SANS. Once those materials were indexed by Google, companies began calling him directly for help navigating high-stakes extortion schemes, such as competing watch retailers taking each other offline during Christmas sales or gambling platforms getting blasted dark right before the Super Bowl.

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: Barrett Lyon Infrastructure Evolution accDescr: Flowchart tracing Barrett Lyon ventures from high school servers to modern consumer networks.

subgraph EarlySecurity["Early Security Defense"] DoxxEarly["High School DoxxNet"] --> SANS["SANS DDoS Guides"] SANS --> Prolexic["Prolexic (Acquired by Akamai)"] Prolexic --> DefNet["Defense.Net (Acquired by F5 Silverline)"] end

subgraph ScaledMedia["Bandwidth & Scale"] DefNet --> BigGrav["Big Gravity (Video CDN)"] BigGrav --> DoxxModern["DoxxNet (Consumer & Agentic Mesh)"] end ```

Recognizing that individual businesses could not afford the massive bandwidth pipes and hardware required to absorb large-scale attacks, Lyon realized that DDoS protection had to be pooled into a shared, leased architecture. This insight produced Prolexic, one of the earliest cloud-based infrastructure security services, which was later acquired by Akamai and still retains the Akamai Prolexic branding. Lyon followed this with Defense.Net, which was later acquired and turned into F5 Silverline. Driven by an affinity for massive scale and high bandwidth, he also founded Big Gravity, one of the first video-centric content delivery networks (CDNs). Big Gravity built optimization technologies that eliminated progressive-download bandwidth waste when users skipped into the middle of video files. Now, Lyon is channeling those decades of carrier-scale networking into a consumer-facing, agent-ready network.

> “Now it's kind of like twisting it. Instead of doing this for corporations, we're doing it for people.” — Barrett Lyon

- Early commercial DDoS attacks were driven by cutthroat commercial extortion, timing traffic floods to critical retail windows and live sporting events. - Lyon built Prolexic around high-capacity leased scrubbing centers, pioneering enterprise cloud security infrastructure. - Big Gravity solved bandwidth inefficiencies in video delivery by ending full progressive file downloads when viewers scrubbed video playback. - The new DoxxNet network incorporates agentic networking primitives designed to handle both human users and autonomous bots. - Lyon acknowledges that privacy networks still face internal abuse threats: “The truth is, even if you have privacy, there's still laws and you need to. At least follow them as much as you can.”

---

`35:28` Mapping the Entire Internet and the MoMA Permanent Collection

De la Garza shifts to Lyon’s artistic career, noting that Lyon created pieces that hang in the permanent collection of the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) in New York. Lyon explains that while studying philosophy, aesthetics, and theoretical AI in college, he worked as a penetration tester. To scope target systems, he routinely drew network topology maps. He soon automated the process and, during lunch one day, impulsively made a $50 bet that he could apply the exact same active reconnaissance technique to map the entire internet. Shortly after making the bet, he was struck by a car while riding his bicycle. Unable to walk and suddenly forced into a slow pace of life, he sat down and wrote the mapping code for what became The Opte Project.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: The Opte Project Origins accDescr: Flowchart showing the creation and exhibition journey of Barrett Lyon Internet mapping project.

PenTest["Pen Testing Network Topology"] --> Bet["$50 Lunch Bet to Map Internet"] Bet --> Accident["Bicycle Accident / Convalescence"] Accident --> OpteCode["Opte Project Visualizations & Code"] OpteCode --> Museums["MoMA, Boston Museum of Science, Global Tours"] OpteCode --> VintCerf["Dialogue with Vint Cerf"] ```

The resulting visualizations and animations captured global attention, showing visual histories of internet evolution where viewers could watch dot-com companies flourish, fail, and crash in network routing space. The work was displayed at the Boston Museum of Science, traveled across international exhibits, and earned two spots in MoMA’s permanent collection, while also giving Lyon the opportunity to discuss internet topology with internet pioneer Vint Cerf.

De la Garza notes that Lyon managed two of the rarest achievements: founding successful technology companies and achieving museum recognition as an artist. Lyon admits that being a successful artist felt far harder than starting a tech business. He recalls attending the celebratory opening at MoMA with drinks, a DJ, and exclusive tours of private MoMA properties, only to crash emotionally the following morning:

> “The next day, I kind of had this imposter syndrome where I just felt super depressed. I'm like, wow, am I ever going to experience what an artist feels like ever again? Because this was kind of like accidental, you know?” — Barrett Lyon

- Lyon holds a philosophy degree with an emphasis on aesthetics and early theoretical artificial intelligence. - The Opte Project mapped internet nodes by automating network discovery techniques originally used to case environments during security audits. - The project documents internet routing shifts over time, visually capturing significant moments of corporate infrastructure growth and collapse.

---

`39:15` The Miami Boat Webcam and Uncovering the Past

Bringing the conversation to current creative experiments, de la Garza and Lyon talk about a book written about Lyon’s early cybersecurity battles. Lyon admits that he frequently forgets the book even exists until strangers bring it up. He shares an anecdote about running a 24-hour, AI-powered webcam that monitors boat traffic in Miami. The stream has run continuously for almost a year and developed an active niche chat community.

A community member in the webcam chat recently connected the camera's host to Barrett Lyon's real-world identity. The user announced in the stream chat that they had just finished reading the published book about him, catching Lyon completely off guard. When de la Garza asks what the book covers, Lyon recalls that it chronicles the beginnings of Prolexic, early distributed cyber attacks, and the cyber extortion investigations from that era.

`40:00` Tracking Cyber Criminals in Moscow

Barrett Lyon recounts the high-stakes battle against aggressive Russian cyber extortionists who targeted and damaged his infrastructure clients. The operational toll was severe, with entire holidays derailed just trying to mitigate distributed denial-of-service disruptions and client fallout. As Barrett puts it:

> “I mean, we had Christmases destroyed because we were just dealing with customers and network outages.”

Joel de la Garza emphasizes that these perpetrators were far from mere mischievous hackers—they operated as hardcore organized criminals engaged in serious illicit enterprises like human trafficking and narcotics smuggling, running cyber extortion as an aggressive sideline.

The confrontation culminated in a trip directly to Moscow. While Barrett was on the ground, the situation escalated until unmistakable indicators warned him that his safety was compromised, prompting a hasty exit from the country. The saga eventually resulted in the perpetrators being sentenced to roughly eight years of hard labor in prison, a wild chapter chronicled in detail in a book. Looking back, Barrett reflects on how surreal the danger felt only in hindsight: living through it seemed almost mundane at the time, but looking back reveals just how extreme it really was.

- **Criminal activities:** Cyber extortion, DDoS assaults, narcotics trafficking, and human trafficking. - **Consequences:** The perpetrators received approximately eight-year hard-labor sentences. - **Investigation aftermath:** Barrett and his team had to abruptly flee Moscow after receiving urgent signals that their lives were at risk.

---

`41:15` Building the Mayan Warrior at Burning Man

Shifting from cybersecurity war stories, Joel brings up Burning Man, noting that Barrett is heading back for roughly his fourteenth burn after missing a couple during the pandemic. The conversation turns to Barrett's involvement with the globally recognized art car, the *Mayan Warrior*. While his creative partner Pablo designed the physical car, Barrett founded and organized the accompanying Mayan Warrior Camp, joining forces to pilot what started as an experimental passion project.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Mayan Warrior Evolution accDescr: Progression of the Mayan Warrior from a desert passion project to a global touring phenomenon and its eventual retirement. subgraph Origins ["Playa Origins"] A["Pablo creates Mayan Warrior art car"] B["Barrett Lyon founds Mayan Warrior Camp"] A --- B end

subgraph Expansion ["Global Phenomenon"] C["Traveling superpower soundstage & laser production"] D["Worldwide ticketed events & creative influence"] Origins --> C --> D end

subgraph Evolution ["Current Chapter"] E["Soundstage retired from the playa"] F["Pablo introduces two standalone art installations"] D --> E D --> F end ```

The installation grew far beyond the Black Rock Desert, morphing into an international sensation that drew massive crowds and sold out independent venue shows worldwide. Barrett explains how creative energy spreads:

> “What I was thinking about this morning is when you're passionate about something, it kind of creates that aura around you, and then other people pick up on it.”

That project inspired countless other artists and builders across the community. However, Barrett shares that an era has concluded: for the first time, they are not bringing the traveling soundstage car back to the playa, and Barrett will not be presenting his signature laser display. Instead, Pablo is bringing two separate, standalone art pieces to Black Rock City.

---

`42:55` Starlink, Radios, and Connectivity on the Playa

Joel and Barrett discuss the changing culture of Black Rock City following the widespread availability of Starlink satellite internet on the playa. Barrett acknowledges the controversy, noting that there are reasonable arguments on both sides. From the perspective of camp operations, real-time data connectivity solves critical logistical nightmares, such as instantly coordinating water refills for art cars, tracking supplies, or preventing newcomers from getting stranded in long lines at the gate.

At the same time, Barrett highlights the classic alternative: his crew still relies on high-powered Motorola radios and shortwave setups, which carry a playful, nostalgic energy while keeping essential camp communications alive. While he embraces connectivity for pragmatic operations, he draws the line at treating the desert like a suburban living room:

> “If you're using it for anything other than like local communications then maybe it's like the wrong wrong use, but it has changed a bit.”

Joel agrees that attendees do not travel out to Burning Man to "Netflix and chill," cautioning against letting ubiquitous broadband erode the immediacy and immersion of the event.

---

`44:03` Wrapping Up DoxxNet and Old Internet Vibes

Closing the episode, Joel ties Barrett’s history of following deep technical rabbit holes directly to his work building DoxxNet. Praising Barrett's lifelong habit of pursuing genuine obsessions regardless of where they lead, Joel expresses his gratitude as an active, satisfied DoxxNet user:

> “It's good to get that old internet vibe back.”

Barrett responds with humility and excitement, replying, “Yeah, well, it's just getting started. And thanks for trusting me to help build it.”

Joel finishes by urging listeners to share DoxxNet with friends and family, subscribe across podcast platforms, and follow a16z’s Substack and social accounts, followed by standard legal and investment disclosures concerning Andreessen Horowitz and its affiliated portfolio investments.

## Notable quotes > `10:00` An IP address is not your driver's license. — Barrett Lyon

> `20:00` if it's not your equipment, you can't set policy. — Barrett Lyon

## Mentioned Barrett Lyon, Joel de la Garza, DoxxNet, Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), Signal, WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Cirrus, Cirrus Airframe Parachute System (CAPS), Buchanan Field Airport, Oakland International Airport, San Carlos Airport, Cisco Umbrella, Prolexic, Defense.Net, Big Gravity, Akamai, F5 Silverline, The Opte Project, Museum of Modern Art (MoMA), Boston Museum of Science, Vint Cerf, Mayan Warrior, Burning Man, Starlink, Switch, Apple

## Video description a16z’s Joel de la Garza sits down with DoxxNet founder Barrett Lyon to discuss what it would take to rebuild the internet around privacy, direct communication, and less dependence on centralized intermediaries. Barrett explains why he thinks traditional VPNs only solve part of the problem and how DoxxNet is building a parallel mesh network where users can communicate peer-to-peer, transfer large files, make calls, and message without routing those interactions through a central application server. He also explains why the company owns its infrastructure and runs its AI systems locally rather than relying on third-party inference providers. doxxnet_assembly They also get into the growing amount of tracking embedded across the internet, what happens when that data can be analyzed by increasingly capable AI, and why Barrett believes the underlying protocols of the internet are due for another wave of experimentation. Along the way, he shares lessons from decades of building internet infrastructure, from fighting early DDoS attacks to mapping the internet and building global networks.

[Source](https://mgln.ai/e/1344/afp-848985-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/3f86df7b-51c6-4101-88a2-550dba782de8/episodes/f388d562-3c7e-4342-ba98-05729b8c29e8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&awCollectionId=3f86df7b-51c6-4101-88a2-550dba782de8&awEpisodeId=f388d562-3c7e-4342-ba98-05729b8c29e8&feed=JGE3yC0V)

中文简报

巴雷特·里昂部署自有裸机网格以绕过云中介 除非网络通过拥有物理基础设施并直接进行点对点流量路由来消除中间应用服务器,否则加密通信仍易受到自动化人工智能监控的威胁。 巴雷特·里昂认为,现代数字通信在中心化中介、运营商级NAT以及普遍存在的广告追踪下停滞不前,而这些如今极易被可扩展的人工智能武器化。为了解决这一问题,里昂构建了DoxxNet,这是一个独立的、可编程的网格网络,它在私有裸机基础设施上实现真正的点对点消息传递、文件共享和通话,无需暴露给第三方服务器。里昂还回顾了自己的工程过往,讲述了一次惊心动魄的飞行途中机械故障、他创立Prolexic并打击网络勒索者的开创性工作,以及绘制如今被现代艺术博物馆收藏的互联网拓扑图的经历。 巴雷特·里昂创建了DoxxNet,旨在从物理硬件层面重建消费级网络,在没有系统管理员的情况下,仅凭一个12人团队在约六个月内就部署了26个具备冗余路由的全球站点。 (21:28) 与Signal和WhatsApp等通过中间服务器路由和存储流量的中心化即时通讯应用不同,DoxxNet采用API驱动的并行网格,用户设备直接进行点对点通信,并具有三到四层后量子加密保护。 (14:40) 里昂指出,传统的商业VPN只是租用第三方裸机并充当中心化代理,他警告称,外国基础设施提供商和有组织犯罪往往会在“无日志”声明的背后破坏数据隐私。 (20:00) 该操作技术栈依赖专有的、自托管的本地人工智能代理进行监控和自动化,不与大型商业人工智能提供商共享任何遥测数据、提示词或推理元数据。 (21:28)

Reading summary

Networking pioneer Barrett Lyon argues that modern digital communications have stagnated into vulnerable, centralized architectures dominated by commercial ad tracking, middlebox restrictions, and pervasive data harvesting. Through his project DoxxNet, Lyon proposes rebuilding the network layer from physical bare metal up into a programmable, peer-to-peer mesh that removes centralized intermediaries. Centralized Intermediaries and Network Protocol Stagnation (0:00) Modern consumer communication applications like WhatsApp, Signal, iMessage, and Telegram give users the illusion of direct person-to-person connection, but every packet passes through centralized intermediary servers that log metadata and create surveillance exposure. Barrett Lyon observes that network protocol innovation has largely halted, with platforms stacking centralized web services and behavioral trackers on top of outdated routing layers. This structural stagnation is compounded by Carrier-Grade NAT (CGNAT), a middlebox routing mechanism that prevents edge devices from directly connecting to each other without intermediate server facilitation. Simultaneously, the threat landscape has escalated with what Joel de la Garza and Lyon describe as scalable, automated machine learning models analyzing mass data exhaust—or "coin-operated intelligence at scale." Decades of accumulated consumer browsing habits, purchase histories, and diagnostic app telemetry (such as Apple diagnostic metrics or WhatsApp endpoints) can now be cheaply ingested by large language models to construct comprehensive behavioral profiles. The Failures of Commercial VPNs and Network-Level Censorship (10:00) Lyon argues that commercial virtual private networks (VPNs) offer merely a brittle, superficial fix by leasing generic server slices from third-party landlords and rerouting encrypted traffic through single proxy points. This leased "bare metal as a service" model exposes users to foreign jurisdictions and covert surveillance pipelines, with free VPNs routinely monetizing user data. Both speakers note that governments and filtering vendors also err by using network routing for identity verification and policy enforcement—a mismatch Lyon summarizes with the observation that an IP address is not a driver's license. Blunt filtering logic frequently inflicts massive collateral damage. For instance, Cisco Umbrella severed connectivity for a major telecom carrier after misclassifying it as located in France during a court-mandated piracy site block. Similarly, classification engines often mislabel legitimate services, such as AI companionship platforms or DoxxNet itself, as adult or illicit content due to superficial heuristics. DoxxNet’s Architecture: Owned Bare Metal and Programmable Mesh (12:35) To eliminate reliance on third parties, DoxxNet bypasses rented cloud infrastructure by deploying 26 globally distributed, redundantly routed bare-metal sites that connect directly to carrier interconnects. Rather than functioning as a standard VPN proxy, DoxxNet serves as an on-ramp to an independent, API-driven parallel mesh network where routing paths, domains, and security policies are spun up dynamically. Users connect through an automated public key infrastructure (PKI) exchange hidden beneath simple friend-invite interfaces, enabling direct peer-to-peer data transfers at line speed without intermediate storage servers. To minimize the blast radius of insider threats—a major corporate vulnerability—DoxxNet operates with an engineering headcount of only 12 people. Lyon's team replaced traditional system and network administrators with proprietary, self-hosted local AI agents that manage global routing and physical security cameras without exporting prompts or telemetry to third-party commercial AI providers. To counter jurisdictional overreach, DoxxNet separates its corporate structure between a primary US entity and an independent Swiss entity. Lyon's Background: From Early Cyber Defense to Internet Art (31:37) Lyon's technical approach draws on decades of building network infrastructure. In high school, he ran the original DoxxNet selling terminal shell accounts to roughly 1,000 users for $5 monthly. Facing continuous attacks, he authored early defensive guides that evolved into Prolexic, a pioneering cloud DDoS scrubbing service later acquired by Akamai. He subsequently founded Defense.Net (acquired by F5 Silverline) and Big Gravity, a video content delivery network that eliminated progressive download bandwidth waste. His security work also involved intense real-world battles, including tracking Russian cyber extortionists to Moscow, culminating in their eight-year prison sentences after Lyon and his team had to make a hurried exit from the country. Lyon also applied active network mapping techniques to create The Opte Project, an artistic visualization of global internet topology that earned two spots in the permanent collection of the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) in New York. Later creative and engineering endeavors include founding the camp behind Burning Man's famed Mayan Warrior art car and utilizing personal general aviation for commuting—a practice he abandoned after surviving a dead-stick landing at Buchanan Field following a catastrophic triple-stage mechanical engine failure. DoxxNet seeks to revive the decentralized ethos of the early web by giving users direct peer-to-peer control over their connectivity. However, Lyon acknowledges that even fully private, decentralized networks must navigate unresolved legal boundaries and technical countermeasures against internal platform abuse.

精炼阅读摘要

资深网络安全专家 Barrett Lyon 与 Joel de la Garza 探讨指出,现代互联网协议层因过度依赖中心化中介、运营商级 NAT 以及商业化追踪而陷入停滞;为此 Lyon 创立 DoxxNet,主张通过自主掌控物理硬件、端到端网状网络与本地人工智能运维,从底层重构具备隐私保护能力的对等互联网架构。 协议层停滞与中介中心化危机 (0:00) 现代即时通信工具如 WhatsApp、Signal、iMessage 和 Telegram 在界面上营造出端到端直接交流的假象,但其实际数据包均须经由中心化第三方服务器流转。Barrett Lyon 认为,互联网底层网络协议设计已基本停滞,现代平台只是在陈旧的架构上堆叠集中式应用与广告追踪脚本。伴随可扩展的“投币式智能”(coin-operated intelligence)时代到来,数十年积累的遥测与交易行为数据能够以极低成本被大型语言模型整合并武器化,进而描绘出用户的精确生活画像。与此同时,运营商级 NAT(CGNAT)等中介盒路由手段严重阻碍了终端设备之间的直接寻址,彻底破坏了互联网诞生之初点对点(P2P)弹性互联的愿景。 网络层监管谬误与商用 VPN 缺陷 (10:00) 政策制定者和内容审查机制常犯的一个根本性架构错误,是将网络层的 IP 地址等同于人类身份验证标识。Lyon 强调“IP 地址不是驾驶执照”,强行在网络层施加生硬的监管往往引发大规模附带破坏,例如思科 Umbrella 在执行法国反盗版封锁令时曾因地理位置错误判定而导致大型电信运营商断网。此外,Joel de la Garza 指出以年龄验证和内容合规为由的网络审查正逐步蔓延。针对主流消费者依赖的商用 VPN,Lyon 与 de la Garza 直言其技术架构脆弱且充斥欺骗性:多数提供商仅是从第三方数据中心租用服务器切片转售,底层硬件控制权受制于外国数据中心甚至犯罪组织,免费工具更是直接将用户数据变现;这些方案只是转移了流量暴露节点,并未解决中心化代理的根本缺陷。 DoxxNet 自研全栈网状对等网络 (12:35) 为突破中介劫持,Lyon 重启高中时期的项目名创办了 DoxxNet,将其设计为一个不依赖中心化存储与中继服务器的并行可编程网状网络。系统在入职验证时采用轻量化拼图而非手机号或邮箱,并通过在“邀请好友”界面下透明运行的自动化公钥基础设施(PKI)建立互信,使两台手机直接互为对等服务器。节点间采用具备后量子弹性的 3 至 4 层加密传输,消除中介阻碍后支持以线速直传数十吉字节的大文件。在组织治理上,DoxxNet 将美国实体与瑞士运营实体分立,以此防范单一司法管辖区的传票滥用与恶意侵扰。 全栈自有裸机与精简本地 AI 运维 (20:00) 吸取海外租赁“裸机即服务”易遭情报机构与黑产渗透的教训,DoxxNet 选择从物理硬件层构建自主基础设施。团队绕开第三方租用节点,在约 6 个月内全球自建了 26 个具备冗余路由的硬件站点并直连运营商互联。令人瞩目的是,全公司仅有 12 名员工,未聘用传统系统管理员或网络工程师,日常网络调度完全依托自研、本地运行的私有 AI 代理完成。本地 AI 从不向外部大模型厂商导出上下文、提示词或遥测数据;这种极度精简的人员架构彻底消除了大型科技企业内部常见的内部特权凭证泄露隐患,大幅收窄了企业安全爆炸半径。 早期网络攻防沉淀与边缘网络未来 (31:37) Lyon 这一技术构想源于其数十年对抗分布式拒绝服务(DDoS)勒索攻击的深厚经历。他早年创立 Prolexic(后被 Akamai 收购)开创了清洗中心云防御模式,随后创立 Defense.Net(后被 F5 收购)及视频流媒体 CDN Big Gravity,甚至曾因追踪俄罗斯黑产勒索团伙而在莫斯科遭遇生死危机。除了技术创业,Lyon 曾因打赌而编写代码绘制出展现互联网拓扑演进的 The Opte Project,并被纽约现代艺术博物馆(MoMA)永久收藏。如今他将早年服务超大型企业抗击流量洪流的经验反转,致力于为普通大众打造兼容人类与自动化自治 Agent 的新型对等网状协议。 Lyon 试图通过 DoxxNet 唤回早期互联网开放、去中心化且不被全天候监控的创造氛围。然而他也坦承,即便构建起高度隐私化的点对点网状网络,系统内部依然面临合规边界、滥用防范以及法律管辖的现实权衡,如何在抵御商业监视的同时遏制非法侵害仍是开放网络不可回避的命题。

Detailed notes — zh

## Background 本期节目由 a16z 的 Joel de la Garza 与 DoxxNet 创始人 Barrett Lyon 于 2026 年 10 月 1 日在播客平台发布。节目简介指出,双方围绕以隐私与直接通信为核心重构互联网展开探讨,重点解析了 DoxxNet 如何摆脱中心化中介服务器与传统 VPN 的局限,利用自建基础设施、端到端点对点网状网络及本地 AI 系统,应对日益泛滥的广告追踪与 AI 监控风险,并回顾了 Barrett 数十年间在网络基建与安全领域的传奇经历。 ## TL;DR 访谈深入剖析了当今互联网协议停滞、中心化中介泛滥以及商业广告追踪被 AI 武器化的系统性危机。Barrett Lyon 详细阐述了新项目 DoxxNet 的设计哲学:通过打破运营商级 NAT(CGNAT)壁垒、自持底层物理硬件及利用本地 AI 调度,打造出支持无中介音视频通话和 20GB 大文件极速直传的去中心化 Mesh 网络。对话还贯穿了 Barrett 的个人传奇历程,涵盖单发活塞飞机空中完全失去动力后的惊险迫降、创办 Prolexic 与 DefenseNet 开创抗 DDoS 云清洗先河、网络拓扑可视化作品入选纽约现代艺术博物馆(MoMA)永久馆藏、深入莫斯科跨国追缉俄罗斯网络罪犯,以及参与火人节“玛雅勇士”艺术大篷车营地建设的跨界经验与对早期互联网精神的坚守。 ## Atmosphere & style 整场对话在硬核技术拆解与惊心动魄的传奇故事之间自如穿梭,充溢着资深极客重逢时的默契、幽默与深刻共鸣。从空中引擎熄火的生死一线,到机房部署“红外激光”防盗的荒诞设想,再到险象环生的莫斯科跨国追凶,叙事节奏跌宕起伏且充满画面感。Barrett Lyon 的讲述既有对抗审查与监控巨头时的反叛锐气,又透露出历经无数商业与技术战役后的从容克制,让听众在浓郁的早期黑客浪漫主义情怀中,深切体会到底层网络重构的紧迫性与厚重感。 ## Bulletin - `05:43` Barrett Lyon 推出平行网状网络 DoxxNet,旨在绕过运营商级 NAT(CGNAT)与中心化中介服务器,通过纯 P2P 架构实现无中继的加密通讯与 20GB 大文件直传。 - `20:00` DoxxNet 采用全栈自主可控的基础设施模型,全球 26 个路由节点与本地运行的 AI 运维代理仅由 12 人团队管理,完全不依赖第三方云租用与外部大模型推理 API。 - `28:00` 针对数字监控,访谈揭示现代商业数据经纪商(Data Brokers)的广告遥测网络已成为情报机构的主要数据源,微小的购买记录与行为聚合即可被大语言模型用于高精度行为画像与推断。 - `31:37` 回顾网络攻防史,Lyon 曾创办全球首个抗 DDoS 云清洗服务商 Prolexic(后被 Akamai 收购)与 DefenseNet,并因意外打赌创建出被纽约现代艺术博物馆(MoMA)永久收藏的“互联网地图项目”(The Opte Project)。 ## Key takeaways - `00:00` WhatsApp、Signal、iMessage 等主流加密聊天软件并非真正的对等通信,用户实质上是在将数据发送给中心化服务器,中心化中介构成了严重的隐私与审查隐患。 - `05:43` 现代互联网协议创新长期停滞,网络运营商广泛部署的“运营商级 NAT”(CGNAT)破坏了端到端连接能力,严重抑制了去中心化与 P2P 应用的创新空间。 - `10:00` 网络层不应承担身份识别职能;IP 地址不是驾驶证,监管机构与安全服务利用底层网络强行拦截往往会导致波及无辜服务商的大规模连带伤害(Blast Radius)。 - `12:35` 传统商业 VPN 只是向第三方机房租用 VPS 的固定出入口,并不能真正保护隐私;如果产品完全免费,用户本身就是被贩卖的数据商品。 - `14:50` 公钥基础设施(PKI)如果直接暴露给普通用户注定无法普及,DoxxNet 通过在“邀请好友”交互下无感交换证书,实现了对等密钥管理的彻底抽象与隐藏。 - `14:50` 在消除中介服务器后,DoxxNet 使得发送端设备直接充当接收端的临时服务器,结合多层后量子加密技术,能够无视常规云存储限制直传 20GB 以上大文件。 - `20:00` 为了彻底避免上游裸金属租售商窥探并压低内部特权风险,DoxxNet 从软件到物理线缆(Software to Wire)全栈自持,运维与路由调度由完全不出域的本地 AI 智能体接管。 - `22:30` 公众对数据中心存在大量妖魔化误解,现代超大规模数据中心多采用闭环冷却系统与极高安全标准,属于高度精密且外部安静的基础设施工程。 - `28:00` 应用内潜藏的遥测端点与广告追踪代码即便被全面阻断,也完全不会影响核心业务逻辑和网页加载性能。 - `30:00` 廉价且具备规模化能力的生成式 AI 正在降低监控成本,攻击者只需将碎片化遥测数据打包喂入 LLM,即可精准推算个体婚姻变动、生育计划等深层隐私。 - `31:37` 早期的 DDoS 攻击往往带有强烈的商业勒索属性,Lyon 开创的 Prolexic 将超大带宽与清洗硬件转化为云租赁模式,奠定了现代安全即服务(SaaS)的商业雏形。 - `31:37` 为应对流媒体分发中用户拖拽进度条造成的带宽浪费,Lyon 曾创办 BitGravity,通过渐进式流媒体优化技术大幅降低传输开销。 - `34:40` 去中心化网络最大的安全与治理挑战不在于防御来自公网外部的流量洪峰,而在于如何检测与遏制内部受信任节点的滥用与内网攻击。 - `35:48` 利用黑客渗透测试中的自动化网络侦察脚本,Lyon 曾绘制出展示全球 BGP 路由与互联网拓扑演进的“互联网地图项目”(The Opte Project),该成果被 MoMA 永久收藏。 - `42:58` Starlink 等卫星互联网虽然极大提高了火人节等极端野外环境的后勤协同与应急补给效率,但也对传统反主流文化的沉浸式体验带来了冲击。 ## Detailed walkthrough ### `00:00` 互联网协议停滞与集中化中介的风险 访谈伊始,Joel de la Garza 与 Barrett Lyon 直奔当下互联网架构的核心弊病:当廉价且大规模运行的“投币式人工智能”(coin-operated intelligence at scale)与数十年积累的线上用户追踪数据相遇,互联网正处于一个极其危险的拐点。当今的网络看似能够实现点对点通信,但 WhatsApp、Signal、iMessage 和 Telegram 等主流端到端加密应用,实际上都将数据经由中心化服务器中转。 Barrett Lyon 指出,底层网络协议的创新已经停滞多年,所有的技术堆叠都建立在陈旧的基础上。用户误以为自己在直接将信息发送给接收方,但实际上任何动作都必须通过第三方的服务器。DoxxNet 的初衷便是彻底抹去这一中心化中间层,利用点对点(P2P)与网状网络(mesh network)架构,在无需应用服务器介入的情况下完成高强度加密通信、文件传输及通话,从底层硬件到网络完全自建,彻底剥离外部中介。 正如 Barrett Lyon 所指出的那样:“The really big problem is on WhatsApp, Signal, iMessage, Telegram. All of those applications disguise themselves as you sending something to somebody else. You're really sending something to a server. The question is like, okay, well, whose servers are those?” --- ### `00:46` 空中惊魂:Cirrus 引擎空中熄火险情 在深入探讨技术之前,Joel 谈及 Barrett 充满传奇色彩的个人经历,提到他曾考取飞行执照,并选择开飞机来优化湾区漫长的通勤路线。Barrett 回忆,在 COVID-19 确立远程办公机制之前,从湾区到太浩湖(Lake Tahoe)驾车需要花费很长时间,而开飞机所需时间与原先不堵车时的通勤时间差不多,于是他购买了一架 Cirrus 单发活塞飞机,飞行时长累计达 1,300 小时。 在一次与 Joel 团队开完会后,Barrett 从圣卡洛斯机场(San Carlos Airport)起飞返航。飞机刚刚越过奥克兰机场(Oakland Airport)上空并穿过 B 类空域(Class Bravo airspace),引擎突然出现异常并彻底失去动力。他当即在空中向朋友发出求救与告别短信,并向空管宣布紧急状态(Mayday),迅速寻找应急着陆场地。他一度考虑拉开 Cirrus 配备的弹道降落伞(ballistic parachute),但他意识到降落伞会彻底摧毁机身,且不保证能平稳触地;在环顾四周后,他决定利用高度滑翔至山脉另一侧的布坎南机场(Buchanan Field Airport)并成功滑行降落。 当救援消防车疾驰而来、消防员走上前与他握手时,后怕的恐惧感才真正爆发出来。事后排查发现,这是一起极其罕见的连锁机械与电气故障,导致动力在爬升阶段彻底断绝。这次事件促使他彻底放弃了私人飞行通勤,并将飞机调机至拉斯维加斯出售。 - **动力故障排查细节**:一个阀门或调节杆(lever)断裂并被吸入进气歧管(air intake manifold),随后掉入油底壳,压损了第 3 和第 6 气缸。 - **点火系统双重失效**:机械碎屑导致全新加装的电子点火系统短路失效;与此同时,作为物理冗余备份的另一侧磁电机(magneto)也发生故障,高转速下完全无法点火。 - **安全降落与心理冲击**:飞机安全滑行至布坎南机场的临时停机位(transient parking spot)。直到看到高大的消防救援车和消防员走来握手,Barrett 才意识到自己刚刚逃过一劫。 --- ### `05:43` DoxxNet 的起源:打破协议停滞与运营商级 NAT 的束缚 险境余生之后,Barrett 将精力投入到新项目 DoxxNet 中。他解释了“DoxxNet”这一名字的历史渊源:高中时代,他的黑客代号是“Doxx”;早在云服务普及之前,他和高中好友就创办了一家名为 DoxxNet 的公司,专门出租服务器 Shell 账户(shell accounts),以每个月 5 美元的价格服务了上千名付费用户。高中毕业后该业务关闭,但他一直保留着这个域名。 谈及创办新 DoxxNet 的动机,Barrett 认为互联网不仅面临严重的审查、广告追踪和恶意软件泛滥,底层网络生态更面临严重的协议停滞。早期的互联网构想是开放、无审查且点对点的,如今整个网络却被少数巨头与中心化基础设施牢牢掌控。与此同时,现代终端具备极其强大的 Wi-Fi 吞吐量和边缘计算能力,完全具备运行高效网状协议和 P2P 通信的硬件基础,但网络运营商广泛部署的“运营商级 NAT”(Carrier-Grade NAT, CGNAT)严重破坏了端到端连接的建立,彻底抑制了去中心化应用的创新空间。DoxxNet 旨在通过重构平行网络,打破 CGNAT 带来的连接屏障,让网络重返直接、点对点加密的最初形态。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 中心化通信与 DoxxNet 架构对比 accDescr: 对比传统聊天工具(通过中心化服务器)与 DoxxNet(点对点直连)的通信架构差异 subgraph Centralized ["主流加密应用通信链路 (Signal / WhatsApp / Telegram)"] A["发送端用户 (Client A)"] -->|"消息与元数据"| B["中心化应用服务器 (中介平台)"] B -->|"投递消息"| C["接收端用户 (Client B)"] end subgraph DoxxNet ["DoxxNet 理想点对点架构"] D["发送端边缘节点 (Peer A)"] -->|"绕过 CGNAT / 穿透中介"| E{"DoxxNet 物理底层网络"} E -->|"端到端直连传输"| F["接收端边缘节点 (Peer B)"] end ``` 正如 Barrett Lyon 所强调的:“And kind of really one of the biggest stains of the entire internet is carrier grade NAT. It's just destroying applications' ability to do really cool stuff. And erasing that is kind of what I'm trying to go for.” - **高中时期的商业雏形**:以每月 5 美元出租 Unix/Linux Shell 账户,拥有约 1,000 名用户,具备完整的社区功能。 - **协议层停滞现状**:缺乏面向现代边缘设备的原生底层协议设计,大部分现代系统仅是在旧架构上打补丁。 - **网络连接障碍**:运营商级 NAT(Carrier-Grade NAT)的存在使得设备在公网缺乏唯一可达地址,迫使流量必须经过集中式代理服务器,阻碍了真正的 P2P 通信。 ### `10:00` 网络层与身份绑定的错位及审查的蔓延 审查制度正在以一种隐蔽而怪异的方式渗透进美国本土。监管部门往往试图用网络层去解决根本不属于它的问题,从而引发诸多系统性故障。正如 Barrett Lyon 犀利指出的那样:“网络根本不管身份识别的事,它手里只有一把锤子,看到什么都当成钉子来砸。IP 地址可不是你的驾照。”(“And the network doesn't do identity. It has a hammer. It's going to hammer the nail. An IP address is not your driver's license.”)如果政策制定者希望依据年龄或其他理由来限制访问,这种控制本应落在软件栈的其他层级,而不是强行要求底层网络基础设施去承担身份识别的职责。 这种粗暴的拦截逻辑在实践中经常引发灾难性的连带伤害(blast radius)。Barrett Lyon 举例提到,不久前法国出台规定要求封锁 100 多个盗版网站,结果类似 Google 或 Cisco Umbrella 这样的安全服务发生误判,将某家大型运营商错误标记为法国境内实体(即便该公司的实际架构根本不在法国)。服务方索性采取“焦土政策”,直接切断了与法国相关的流量,导致该运营商的大量业务瞬间瘫痪。地理位置提供商(Geo provider)一旦出现识别偏差,无辜的机构和用户就会瞬间沦为错误策略的牺牲品。 Joel de la Garza 随后分享了风险投资中的类似遭遇:a16z 曾评估过一家研发陪伴型聊天机器人(e-partner / e-spouse)的初创公司,其业务完全合规且没有任何不良内容,然而市面上半数的网络分类引擎却机械地将其打上了“成人内容”的标签并予以封锁。Barrett Lyon 笑着表示 DoxxNet 也深有体会——因为名字里带了两个“x”,再加上黑客圈常说的“开盒”(doxing),他们的平台在一开始甚至被 Claude 等 AI 模型直接标记封禁;好在团队通过正式途径提交申诉并完成了注册审核,对方才全面解除了所有限制。 - 网络分类错误不仅波及色情或反盗版领域,还会直接误伤正常的医疗健康和AI伴侣网站。 - DoxxNet 由于命名特征(含双“X”以及与 doxing 同音)曾触发 Claude 的合规误报,后续经官方渠道沟通后顺利解封。 --- ### `12:35` 传统 VPN 的局限与 DoxxNet 的网状网络构想 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Traditional VPN vs DoxxNet Architecture accDescr: Comparing the centralized server-proxy model of traditional VPNs against DoxxNet's programmable mesh network and direct peer-to-peer applications. subgraph TradVPN["传统 VPN 架构"] direction TB U1["用户客户端"] -->|"加密连接"| S1["第三方租赁服务器 (VPS)"] S1 -->|"以单节点出口访问"| Web["公网 Internet"] end subgraph DoxxMesh["DoxxNet 架构"] direction TB U2["用户客户端 / AI Agent"] -->|"API 毫秒级调度"| Mesh["去中心化 Mesh 协议层"] Mesh --- Reg["动态租用 IP / 注册域名 / 编排策略"] U2 <-->|"端到端直连 (P2P)"| Peer["对端设备 (手机/电脑)"] Peer --- Apps["无服务器通信:音视频通话、加密聊天、无限制传输"] end ``` 这种日益蔓延的信息极权催生了庞大的隐私防护工具生态,其中最普遍的莫过于 VPN。但 Barrett Lyon 认为绝大多数现有工具都治标不治本。传统 VPN 充其量只是“进出网络的出入口”,服务商通常只是从云服务商或机房租赁服务器,架设一套加密代理软件,用户的全部请求最终都从那个固定的单点节点流向公网。人们误以为这样获得了安全,其实只是把 IP 地址作为身份标识的弊端做了一层浅显的掩盖,架构极其原始。 相比之下,DoxxNet 选择彻底重构这套逻辑。它将 VPN 协议仅作为接入网络的通道,在此之上利用开放 API 构建起一个可以在毫秒级别动态调整的“网状网络”(Mesh Network)或平行互联网。用户或其 AI Agent 可以借助 API 编程整个网络,在极短时间内完成内部域名注册、IP 地址租赁、Mesh 地址分配以及访问控制策略的编排。更关键的是,团队利用这一自主可控的底层网络开发了真正实用的 P2P 应用程序: - **无中心化应用服务器**:语音通话、视频会议和即时通讯直接运行于网状网络之上,全程端到端加密。 - **摆脱传统通信标识**:不需要绑定手机号,不需要任何实名注册信息。 - **毫秒级网络重塑**:所有节点分配与路由规则均可通过 API 在毫秒级时间内生效并执行。 --- ### `14:50` 极简 PKI、真 P2P 架构与 20GB 大文件无感直传 Joel de la Garza 感慨道,在安全行业摸爬滚打多年的人心中都有一条铁律——“如果想进行真正私密的对话,绝对不要在任何装有电池或有电信号的设备旁进行”。而 DoxxNet 正在尝试打破这种宿命,打造一种完全无痕的即时直连网络。在进入 DoxxNet 时,用户只需要解开一个防机器人拼图证明自己是人类,即可获得一个完全私有的 Token;用户不仅可以随时更改这个 Token,还能在注销账户后瞬间新建一个,整个过程不留任何个人数据痕迹。 在好友配对上,DoxxNet 彻底隐藏了复杂的公钥基础设施(PKI)。Joel de la Garza 评价道:“公钥基础设施(PKI)最核心的一个教训就是:如果你告诉用户这是 PKI,那这套系统注定推广不起来;你必须把那一层技术彻底抽象并隐藏掉。”(“I think the key lesson of PKI was actually if you tell people it's PKI, it's not going to work. You have to kind of abstract that layer away, right?”)在 DoxxNet 中,用户只需点击一个看似平常的“邀请好友”按钮,系统底层就已经默默完成了点对点的加密证书交换。一旦双方建立信任关系,两台手机就能在 Mesh 网络中实现纯粹的点对点通信。 Barrett Lyon 重点批判了现有主流即时通讯工具的虚伪性: > “WhatsApp、Signal、iMessage、Telegram(顺便说一句,Telegram 特别诡异)最大的问题,就在于它们都伪装成是你把东西直接发给另一个人。但实际上,你永远是把文件先传给一台服务器,再由对方从服务器拉取。” > (“The really big problem is on WhatsApp, Signal, iMessage, Telegram, and by the way, Telegram's creepy. All of those applications disguise themselves as you sending something to somebody else. But you're really sending something to a server, and then the server is then having the other person pull that.”) 这种中心化服务器中转的模式带来了严峻的瓶颈:上传基础设施分布不均、跨地域传输速度奇慢,而且施加了严格的文件体积限制。而 DoxxNet 将中介服务器彻底剔除,使发送方的手机直接充当接收方的专用服务器。在拥有三到四层后量子加密算法(Post-quantum cryptography)的保护下,用户可以实现超低延迟、点对点直接传输 20GB 的超大文件,将其变成了一套用于“言论自由与免于监视”的完备工具箱。 --- ### `17:40` 免费 VPN 的陷阱与合规治理的防火墙 谈及通信工具的安全性,Joel de la Garza 提到了跨国执法部门打击有组织犯罪的一起标志性案例:许多跨国犯罪分子迷信某些所谓小众的“绝密加密 App”,坚信“千万别用 Signal,那背后是 NSA;用这款软件才安全,全球只有几个人在用”。结果该应用本身其实早已被警方控制(暗指诸如 ANOM 等钓鱼执法平台),最终导致涉案人员被全球多国执法机构联合起诉并集体送入监狱。与此同时,应用商店中充斥着几十款打着“完全免费”旗号的海外 VPN,其背后的安全隐患令人毛骨悚然。 Barrett Lyon 对这种乱象作出了直接总结:“如果它是免费的,那就根本不存在所谓的免费。如果你不为产品掏钱,你自己就是那个被摆在货架上的商品,你正在被生吞活剥。”(“If it's free, there's nothing free. If you're not paying for it, you are the product. You're being eaten alive.”)为了从底层杜绝这种灰色运作,DoxxNet 在公司治理结构上设置了严格的防火墙: - **法权与运营隔离**:DoxxNet 总部设在美国以受美国法律保护,但同时在瑞士设立了独立实体全面掌管欧洲所有业务,确保各区域运营主体与数据主权彼此隔离。 - **透明的公司治理**:坚决摒弃那些隐瞒实际控制人、对商业动机讳莫如深的 VPN 运作套路,向社区公开核心团队背景与各项工程设计背后的决策原因。 在对话的最后,Joel de la Garza 指出,人们日常总喜欢把威胁模型无限拔高到国家级情报机构(诸如 CIA、NSA 等),但在现实世界中,用户面临的风险往往低级且直接得多——例如在早期几波加密货币牛市中,大量受害者的钱包资产被洗劫一空,根本原因仅仅是因为他们连接了某些来路不明的恶意 VPN 节点而被窃取了敏感数据。 ### `20:00` 传统 VPN 的阴暗面与全栈自主基础设施 在谈及网络安全时,Joel de la Garza 和 Barrett Lyon 深入探讨了部分国家情报机构与有组织犯罪相互勾结的现实。许多用户往往盲目相信传统 VPN 所谓“无日志记录(no logs)”的营销承诺,却很少追问底层服务器的归属权。Barrett 指出,关键问题在于这些服务器究竟归大品牌 VPN 官方所有,还是租来的?如果是租赁的,上游提供商是谁?这些第三方又在拿数据做什么?他感叹,裸金属即服务(bare metal as a service)行业背后存在大量灰暗地带,而这正是他不得不经历的痛苦认知过程:“如果你不拥有设备,你就无法制定策略。你就是做不到(if it's not your equipment, you can't set policy. It's just you can't)。” 为了彻底规避这一风险,DoxxNet 采取了极端但稳健的架构路径:从软件到物理线路(software to wire)完全自研并拥有全栈所有权。就连驱动路由决策的 AI 系统也完全运行在自己的物理硬件上。Joel 提到,在当前 GPU 极度紧缺、电力难求且反数据中心情绪高涨的背景下,Barrett 团队竟在短短约六个月内就部署完成了遍布全球的 26 个冗余路由节点。更令人吃惊的是,整个公司仅有 12 名参与人员,完全没有传统的网络管理员或系统管理员(sysadmin),底层所有运维均由本地 AI 代理自主调度接管。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: DoxxNet 全栈基础设施控制架构 accDescr: 展示 DoxxNet 如何通过自主硬件和本地 AI 代理消除外部威胁与内部特权访问 subgraph ControlPlane ["受限核心团队"] Team["12 人核心团队<br/>无网管 / 无系统管理员"] end subgraph LocalStack ["自主全栈基础设施 (26 个全球节点)"] AI["本地运维与路由 AI Agent<br/>(上下文与推理完全不出域)"] Hardware["自持裸金属服务器<br/>(Software to Wire)"] Sensors["摄像头与实体安全监控"] end subgraph ExternalThreats ["阻断的外部与内部风险"] BigAI["第三方大型 AI 推理服务商"] Brokers["不受控的机房租赁中间商"] Insider["大规模员工内部特权威胁"] end Team --> Hardware AI -->|"全自动运维与智能路由"| Hardware Sensors --> AI Hardware -.->|"数据零外传"| BigAI Hardware -.->|"自持物理资产"| Brokers Hardware -.->|"极小爆炸半径"| Insider ``` - **全栈自有**:拥有从上层软件到最底层物理线缆的完整控制权,排除了第三方裸金属提供商窥探数据的可能。 - **12 人支撑 26 个站点**:全球 26 个节点完全依赖本地 AI 代理进行自主路由与运维,系统运行表现极为平稳。 - **内部威胁(Insider Threat)降到最低**:没有上千名员工拥有网络访问权限,大幅压缩了潜在攻击的“爆炸半径(blast radius)”。 - **推理不出域**:所有 AI 上下文和推理计算严格封闭在本地物理环境中运行,绝不向第三方大型 AI 公司外送任何数据。 --- ### `22:30` 数据中心现实与荒谬的公众迷思 谈到物理机房的安全性,Barrett 笑称他们最初甚至考虑过在机房里部署激光防盗传感器,搞得像《碟中谍》(Mission: Impossible)一样酷炫。他们甚至已经调研了相应的光电开关联动报警装置,但最终发现根本行不通——因为数据中心不仅常年灯火通明,而且内部环境极度洁净,既没有灰尘也没有悬浮颗粒物,根本看不到红外激光束;总不能为了“激光秀”而在机房里喷洒滑石粉或人工造烟。Joel 也调侃道,这就好比 Las Vegas 的 Switch 数据中心,会在园区里停着架设.50 口径机枪的吉普车来震撼访客。 话题随即转到公众对数据中心荒唐的误解与妖魔化宣传。当前流行媒体充斥着诸如“数据中心在疯狂喝水”的荒谬论调,甚至有人将机房内部的声音剪辑成嘈杂的视频,误导网民以为机房是喧嚣的工业怪兽。Barrett 指出,事实上从外部看,数据中心只是一座极其安静普通的建筑物,外围通常只有大片停车场或者草地上蹦跶的野兔(例如弗吉尼亚州庞大的数据中心园区)。所谓的“吞噬湖水”,现实中其实是全封闭冷却系统——比如 Switch 在雷诺(Reno)附近修建的人工湖,主要是备用蓄水池,仅在极端冷却故障需要彻底排空并重新灌注系统时才会使用极少量的补给。 Joel 和 Barrett 认为,数据中心是人类仅次于商用客机的最精密封闭工程之一。数据中心不仅没有破坏当地生态,反而创造了高薪就业,为当地带来了先进的基础设施和极高的人均税收。Barrett 感叹,看到社交媒体(如 TikTok、Instagram)上被操纵的阴谋论、反数据中心洗脑音乐视频,进而阻碍国家急需的技术基础设施建设,是非常危险的局面:“对我来说,我们技术的未来在于现在就必须建设这些基础设施。如果我们正在削弱它,那我们就是在做出错误的决策(And to me, the future of our tech is needing to build this infrastructure now. And if we're crippling it, then we're making bad decisions)。” --- ### `28:00` 广告追踪生态与被量化的数字人生 讨论深入到了 Barrett 创建 DoxxNet 的另一大初衷:广告追踪系统无孔不入的监控。Joel 指出,大众往往恐惧神话中的国家安全局(NSA)等情报机关,但事实是商业广告公司的追踪技术早已走在情报机构前面;如今各类情报机关甚至反过来从商业数据经纪商(data brokers)手中购买数据,利用广告公司的现成追踪手段进行情报作业。 几乎所有日常应用都潜藏着隐形追踪器,例如 WhatsApp 的 `DIT.whatsapp.net`,以及苹果系统内置的遥测(Apple telemetry)服务。科技巨头们巧妙地用“遥测数据”或“元数据(metadata)”这种中性词汇掩饰追踪本质。Barrett 直言,屏蔽这些遥测外联根本不会破坏应用或网页的核心功能,网站依然能秒级加载。曾有一位极具争议的富豪问 Barrett:“别人知道我在 target.com 买内裤又能怎样?”Barrett 的回应一针见血:问题绝不在于单一一次购买,而在于跨应用、跨网站的多维数据汇聚与长期存储。 这些散落的数据点一旦被经纪商汇聚并被高级算法拼凑,个人的全貌就会被精准还原:你是不是咖啡饮用者、早晨几点起床、收入区间是多少、平时在何处消费、消费频次如何,甚至能提前推断出你是否正在备孕迎接新生儿,亦或是正在暗中准备离婚。面对这种将人的私人生活拆解、打包并上市售卖的数据生态,Barrett 斩钉截铁地表示,在底层把这些追踪通信统统掐断,他心里没有半点负担。 - **隐匿追踪无处不在**:从通信工具(WhatsApp 的遥测端点)到操作系统底层的分析服务,各家厂商都以“遥测”之名搜集用户行为。 - **阻断追踪不损功能**:绝大部分 App 和网站在遥测域名被拦截后,基础业务逻辑和加载速度丝毫不受影响。 - **微小数据拼出完整画像**:单一的内裤订单看似无害,但聚合了作息节奏、出行路线、消费水准后,AI 和数据经纪商就能精准推算用户的重大人生变故(如离婚、怀孕)。 - **情报机构转向商业数据源**:现代情报系统已深度依赖商业广告数据经纪商,形成了商业资本与监控网络融合的庞大生态。 ### `30:00` 告别无处不在的追踪:用去中心化网络重拾互联网初心 Barrett Lyon 坦言,自己对如今互联网上泛滥的追踪技术深恶痛绝,DoxxNet 的核心目标之一正是从网络底层彻底剔除这些附着物。他希望借此重构一个能够自由连接、激发创造力,且不必担心被广告商或政府监视的“原始互联网体验”。Joel de la Garza 随即指出,当前时代正处在一个危险的拐点:廉价且具备规模化能力的 AI 宛如“无限只猴子用无限台打字机”写作,加之全网随处可见的遥测数据与数字足迹,攻击者或监控者只需将这些追踪数据打包喂给大语言模型(LLM),就能轻而易举拼凑出特定目标的完整肖像,甚至可能据此精准协调跨平台的复杂行动。 Barrett Lyon 认为广告追踪这种侵入性机制即便彻底消失,用户的生活只会变得更好。对于网络基础设施的未来,他充满期待地指出:“在底层,这就像尝试重塑互联网曾经拥有的氛围,然后看看我们能带着更大的资源走向何方,你可以开始创造更多目前尚不存在的协议和事物。”Joel de la Garza 感慨互联网最初正是凭借自由与免费而走向繁荣,感谢他尝试让网络重获自由;Barrett 则半开玩笑地回应道,虽然他在努力重塑自由网络,但“大家还是得付费给我”。 - 追踪与 AI 叠加的风险:全网海量的遥测与广告数据一旦被输入 LLM,即可快速生成详尽的个人画像与精准行动。 - 协议创新的诉求:不仅是开发客户端应用,更需要在拥有充沛带宽与底层资源的条件下,探索并制定下一代无需中心化中介的网络协议。 --- ### `31:37` 从抵御 DDoS 到首创云清洗:Prolexic、DefenseNet 与内容分发历程 两人的对话随后回溯到 2000 年代初期的网络安全攻防历史。Joel de la Garza 提到,自己当年深入研究过 Stacheldraht、TFN、TFN2K 等早期知名的分布式拒绝服务(DDoS)僵尸网络,而 Barrett Lyon 当时正站在防御这类大规模流量攻击的最前线。谈及创办抗 DDoS 巨头 Prolexic 的机缘,Barrett 表示这同样能追溯到高中时期他在 DoxxNet 服务器上与攻击者的周旋。为了抵御攻击,他将摸索总结出的生存技巧写成指南,不料在 SANS 峰会分享并在 Google 上广泛传播后,电话接踵而至,将他直接卷入了对抗网络敲诈勒索的真实网络犯罪前线。 当时的 DDoS 勒索极其猖獗:在圣诞购物季,手表电商之间会互相发动流量攻击瘫痪竞品网站;每逢超级碗开赛前夕,博彩网站往往会集体宕机。Barrett 意识到,对抗这种规模化攻击必须依赖昂贵的巨量带宽与高端硬件,普通企业根本无法单独承担,于是他开创了以租用模式提供防护的先河,打造出最早的云计算安全服务形态之一。该业务后来被 Akamai 收购,并极为罕见地保留了 Prolexic 的原名运作至今;此后他又创办了 DefenseNet(后来被 F5 收购演变为 F5 Silverline)。除安全外,出于对大带宽与规模化系统的热爱,他还创立了业内首个以超大文件和视频交付为核心的 CDN 公司 BitGravity,利用独特的渐进式下载优化技术,避免了用户仅因在视频时间轴上快进拖拽就消耗全量带宽的高昂浪费。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Barrett Lyon 网络基础设施与安全创业演进 accDescr: 展示 Barrett Lyon 从高中时期抵御 DDoS 到创立 Prolexic、BitGravity 及最新 DoxxNet 的技术演变路径。 subgraph AntiDDoS ["DDoS 安全与云清洗服务"] A["高中自建服务器防御技巧"] --> B["SANS 演讲与指南公开"] B --> C["创立 Prolexic<br/>(开创抗 DDoS 云租赁服务模式)"] C --> D["被 Akamai 收购并沿用原名"] C --> E["创立 DefenseNet"] E --> F["被 F5 收购成为 Silverline"] end subgraph VideoCDN ["大带宽与流媒体优化"] G["创立 BitGravity<br/>(业内首个专注视频/大文件 CDN)"] G --> H["优化进度条拖拽流量损耗"] end subgraph ConsumerNet ["去中心化网络重构"] C & G --> I["创立 DoxxNet<br/>(将大规模基建转向个人与 Agent 服务)"] end ``` - 商业恶意攻击案例:同品类电商在圣诞促销期通过买凶攻击使竞争对手下线;超级碗等重大体育赛事前夕针对线上博彩业的系统性勒索。 - 基础设施商业化转型:将超大带宽与昂贵路由硬件封装为“清洗云服务”,成为早期 Security-as-a-Service 范例。 - 视频传输成本节约:BitGravity 通过精细化的媒体流管理,解决了传统渐进式文件直接从头加载导致快进时白白浪费海量带宽的痛点。 --- ### `34:40` 从服务企业到赋能个人:网络隐私与法规的现实边界 在经历了数次面向大型企业客户的大规模网络基建创业后,Barrett Lyon 决定将重心转向大众用户与新兴的智能体网络(Agentic Networking)。谈及这一转变的内在驱动力,他表示:“现在这有点像换了个方向。我们不再为大企业做这些,而是为普通人做这件事。至少在做得足够好这个层面上,我还没怎么见过有人这么做。” 面对可能随之而来的滥用问题,Joel de la Garza 调侃 Barrett 的新网络是否准备好应对 DDoS,Barrett 回应称,来自公网外部的流量攻击他早有防备,但真正棘手且有趣的挑战在于:一旦有人加入内部网络并开始从内网发起恶意攻击,系统必须进行妥善隔离与治理。他明确强调,追求极致隐私并不等同于逃避法纪:“事实是,即便你拥有隐私保护,法律依旧存在,你至少需要尽可能地去遵守它们。” - 目标客群转型:从昂贵的 B2B 基础设施服务,转变为面向普通个体及自治 Agent 的隐私对等通信网络。 - 内部威胁防御挑战:相比成熟的外部公网清洗,如何遏制获得授信许可的内部节点恶意滥用,是去中心化网络治理的关键难点。 --- ### `35:48` 意外的 MoMA 参展艺术家:测绘互联网全景的传奇缘起 在极客与企业家的身份之外,Barrett Lyon 还以艺术家的身份被纽约现代艺术博物馆(MoMA)永久收藏了两件数字艺术作品。这段跨界经历源于他大学时期主修的哲学专业——当时他专注于美学以及理论人工智能,他笑称如今看来哲学学位对从事 AI 竟格外有用。这幅著名网络地图的诞生纯属偶然:当时 Barrett 的全职工作是渗透测试(白帽黑客),在对目标企业进行踩点分析时,自动化绘制内部网络拓扑图是最高效的突破方式;某天午餐时他一时兴起,和同事打了一个 50 美元的赌,扬言能用同样的扫描技术将整个互联网的路由拓扑绘制成图。 就在他认为自己肯定要输掉赌局时,一场意外骑行车祸将他撞伤,导致他无法行走。原本快节奏的生活突然停摆,养伤期间的他静坐下来编写了扫描与可视化代码,不仅赢了赌局,最终更演变为震撼世界的“互联网地图项目”(The Opte Project)。这些数据图及动态演进影像不仅被波士顿科学博物馆等全球多家机构巡展,更被 MoMA 永久收藏。作品不仅具备独特的视觉美感,更如实记录了互联网基础设施的兴衰历史,观者甚至能在可视化动态中亲眼见证某家互联网公司的骤然崩塌。这段经历还促使他与互联网先驱 Vint Cerf 面对面交流探讨底层拓扑结构。 对于在商业与先锋艺术两个高难度领域同时取得成就,Joel de la Garza 评价道:“作为一名成功的艺术家,大概比创办一家科技公司要难得多。”Barrett 回忆起在 MoMA 盛大开幕派对当晚的狂欢,现场有 DJ、美酒和策展人带领参观私人馆藏,但随后而来的却是巨大的“冒名顶替综合征”(Imposter Syndrome)与阵阵失落感。他内心深处总觉得自己进入当代艺术最高殿堂带有极大的偶然性,甚至怀疑自己未来是否还能再次体会到真正艺术家的创作心境。此外,Barrett Lyon 的传奇创业经历还被完整写入了专著中;而他近年在迈阿密部署了一个 24 小时运行的 AI 船舶监控摄像头,在维护专属社区时,意外有社区网友认出他正是那本讲述早期网络安全大战与 Prolexic 创立风云的书籍主角。 - 艺术与技术交叉:将网络侦察(Network Reconnaissance)脚本拓展至全网 BGP 路由与 IP 拓扑抓取,开创网络空间宏观可视化先河。 - 历史文献价值:地图动画记录了 21 世纪初互联网骨干网扩张、点对点连接重组以及泡沫破灭期间企业的消亡过程。 - 艺术界罕见成就:凭借非传统数字数据可视化作品,成为科技界罕见的、作品入选 MoMA 永久馆藏的跨界从业者。 ### `40:00` 跨国追缉俄罗斯网络黑客与惊险的莫斯科之行 Barrett Lyon 回忆起当年追踪一伙极度猖獗的俄罗斯网络犯罪分子的经历。这群黑客手段凶狠,肆无忌惮地敲诈勒索,并对 Lyon 团队的客户造成了极其严重的破坏。当时 Lyon 团队被折腾得精疲力竭,连圣诞节都被彻底毁了,所有人都在焦头烂额地处理客户投诉与大面积的网络瘫痪。Joel de la Garza 补充道,这帮人根本不是普通黑客,而是真正的重罪分子——他们不仅从事人口贩卖和毒品走私,黑客敲诈只是他们的“副业”而已。 最终,这几名犯罪分子被捕并被判处约八年苦役。Lyon 透露,他们当时甚至亲自前往俄罗斯莫斯科调查,但随后收到了极其明确且危险的警告信号,告诉他们必须立刻离开。于是他们紧急撤离了俄罗斯。后来有一整本书专门记录了这段惊心动魄的真实传奇。回望这段经历,Barrett Lyon 感慨道:“It's really weird because when you live it, Seems kind of normal, but then you look back and go, oh, geez, that was kind of crazy.” - 犯罪分子作恶多端,涉及网络勒索、人口贩卖及毒品交易,导致受害客户网络大规模瘫痪。 - 涉案黑客最终被判处约 8 年苦役监禁。 - 调查团队在莫斯科遭遇明确危险信号后紧急撤离。 --- ### `41:15` 火人节的“玛雅勇士”传奇与艺术装置的落幕 谈话转向了即将到来的火人节(Burning Man)。Barrett Lyon 表示今年将是他第 14 次参加火人节(扣除疫情期间错过的几届)。提到火人节上闻名遐迩的艺术改装车时,Lyon 澄清说,那是他的合伙人 Pablo 的杰作:Pablo 打造了享誉全球的艺术大篷车“玛雅勇士”(Mayan Warrior),而 Lyon 则创办并运营了“玛雅勇士营地”(Mayan Warrior Camp),两人曾是长期的亲密搭档。这辆车最初只是一个好玩的艺术项目,后来演变成席卷全球的现象级文化符号,无数人甚至专门买票去世界各地观看它的巡演。 Barrett Lyon 总结了自己对创造力的领悟:“What I was thinking about this morning is when you're passionate about something, it kind of creates that aura around you, and then other people pick up on it.” 他认为这种极度的热爱感染并启发了许多人去创造类似的精彩项目。不过今年是一个转折点——他们决定不再把“玛雅勇士”带到火人节的黑石沙漠(Playa),Lyon 自己的标志性激光秀也不会再上演。那座曾经震撼沙漠的“移动超能移动音乐舞台”正式告一段落,不过 Pablo 依然会带去两件非常酷的新艺术作品。 --- ### `42:58` 荒漠连接 Starlink:技术便利对反主流文化的冲击与重构 随着星链(Starlink)卫星网络进入火人节黑石沙漠,营地的现场氛围发生了微妙变化。Joel de la Garza 询问荒漠通网后大家的感觉如何,Barrett Lyon 认为这是一把双刃剑:对于营地运营组织者来说,网络接入带来了巨大的实用价值。例如当营地水车耗尽水时,能及时联系补给;车辆在入口处排队时,也不用像过去那样一卡就是好几个小时。虽然传统的摩托罗拉(Motorola)大功率无线电对讲机和短波电台很有童年般的复古趣味,但 Starlink 确实极大地消除了后勤组织上的焦虑与摩擦。 不过,Lyon 也明确指出了滥用网络的荒谬之处。如果有人去火人节是为了刷流媒体看电影,那完全违背了火人节的初衷:“if you're using it for anything other than like local communications then maybe it's like the wrong wrong use but but it but it has changed a bit.” - 组织者过去依赖高功率 Motorola 对讲机及短波设备进行沙漠现场调度。 - Starlink 显著提升了沙漠营地的后勤协调效率(如水资源调配、门口检票通行)。 - 嘉宾一致认为,如果在火人节荒漠里“Netflix and chill”(窝着刷剧),就是对该技术的错误使用。 --- ### `43:53` 重拾老互联网精神与结语 对话接近尾声,Joel de la Garza 赞扬 Barrett Lyon 身上那种始终追随内心热爱、探索各种奇妙技术未知领域的极客精神。作为 DoxxNet 的忠实用户,Joel 表达了由衷的感谢,感叹 DoxxNet 让人重新找回了早期互联网那种纯粹、去中心化且尊重个人隐私的美好感觉。Barrett Lyon 回应道,这一切才刚刚拉开序幕,并感谢大家对他重构底层网络愿景的信任,鼓励更多人将这款网络工具分享给身边的亲朋好友。播客最后在 a16z 官方的免责声明与投资披露提示中圆满结束。 ## Notable quotes > `17:40` 如果它是免费的,那就根本不存在所谓的免费。如果你不为产品掏钱,你自己就是那个被摆在货架上的商品,你正在被生吞活剥。 — Barrett Lyon > `14:50` 公钥基础设施(PKI)最核心的一个教训就是:如果你告诉用户这是 PKI,那这套系统注定推广不起来;你必须把那一层技术彻底抽象并隐藏掉。 — Joel de la Garza > `10:00` 网络根本不管身份识别的事,它手里只有一把锤子,看到什么都当成钉子来砸。IP 地址可不是你的驾照。 — Barrett Lyon > `00:00` The really big problem is on WhatsApp, Signal, iMessage, Telegram. All of those applications disguise themselves as you sending something to somebody else. You're really sending something to a server. The question is like, okay, well, whose servers are those? — Barrett Lyon > `20:00` if it's not your equipment, you can't set policy. It's just you can't — Barrett Lyon > `34:40` 事实是,即便你拥有隐私保护,法律依旧存在,你至少需要尽可能地去遵守它们。 — Barrett Lyon > `05:43` And kind of really one of the biggest stains of the entire internet is carrier grade NAT. It's just destroying applications' ability to do really cool stuff. And erasing that is kind of what I'm trying to go for. — Barrett Lyon > `35:48` 作为一名成功的艺术家,大概比创办一家科技公司要难得多。 — Joel de la Garza ## Mentioned Barrett Lyon, Joel de la Garza, DoxxNet, a16z, Cirrus, WhatsApp, Signal, iMessage, Telegram, Claude, Google, Cisco Umbrella, ANOM, Switch, NSA, CIA, Target, Prolexic, DefenseNet, BitGravity, Akamai, F5, F5 Silverline, SANS, Vint Cerf, MoMA, 波士顿科学博物馆, The Opte Project, Burning Man, Mayan Warrior, Pablo, Starlink, Motorola ## Video description a16z’s Joel de la Garza sits down with DoxxNet founder Barrett Lyon to discuss what it would take to rebuild the internet around privacy, direct communication, and less dependence on centralized intermediaries. Barrett explains why he thinks traditional VPNs only solve part of the problem and how DoxxNet is building a parallel mesh network where users can communicate peer-to-peer, transfer large files, make calls, and message without routing those interactions through a central application server. He also explains why the company owns its infrastructure and runs its AI systems locally rather than relying on third-party inference providers. doxxnet_assembly They also get into the growing amount of tracking embedded across the internet, what happens when that data can be analyzed by increasingly capable AI, and why Barrett believes the underlying protocols of the internet are due for another wave of experimentation. Along the way, he shares lessons from decades of building internet infrastructure, from fighting early DDoS attacks to mapping the internet and building global networks. [Source](https://mgln.ai/e/1344/afp-848985-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/3f86df7b-51c6-4101-88a2-550dba782de8/episodes/f388d562-3c7e-4342-ba98-05729b8c29e8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&awCollectionId=3f86df7b-51c6-4101-88a2-550dba782de8&awEpisodeId=f388d562-3c7e-4342-ba98-05729b8c29e8&feed=JGE3yC0V)

Source quotes

[17:40] Barrett Lyon: 如果它是免费的,那就根本不存在所谓的免费。如果你不为产品掏钱,你自己就是那个被摆在货架上的商品,你正在被生吞活剥。 [14:50] Joel de la Garza: 公钥基础设施(PKI)最核心的一个教训就是:如果你告诉用户这是 PKI,那这套系统注定推广不起来;你必须把那一层技术彻底抽象并隐藏掉。 [10:00] Barrett Lyon: 网络根本不管身份识别的事,它手里只有一把锤子,看到什么都当成钉子来砸。IP 地址可不是你的驾照。 [0:00] Barrett Lyon: The really big problem is on WhatsApp, Signal, iMessage, Telegram. All of those applications disguise themselves as you sending something to somebody else. You're really sending something to a server. The question is like, okay, well, whose servers are those? [20:00] Barrett Lyon: if it's not your equipment, you can't set policy. It's just you can't [34:40] Barrett Lyon: 事实是,即便你拥有隐私保护,法律依旧存在,你至少需要尽可能地去遵守它们。 [5:43] Barrett Lyon: And kind of really one of the biggest stains of the entire internet is carrier grade NAT. It's just destroying applications' ability to do really cool stuff. And erasing that is kind of what I'm trying to go for. [35:48] Joel de la Garza: 作为一名成功的艺术家,大概比创办一家科技公司要难得多。

Source quotes

[10:00] Barrett Lyon: An IP address is not your driver's license. [20:00] Barrett Lyon: if it's not your equipment, you can't set policy.

Original transcript

[0:00] We're really at an inflection point because you have the birth of essentially coin-operated intelligence at scale. The internet has really kind of stagnated a bit from protocol design. There's like not a lot of new stuff, all of it's built on top. Erasing that is kind of what I'm trying to go for. What you're saying is you've actually built this transient way for folks to connect and chat without there being any record. The really big problem is on WhatsApp, Signal, iMessage, Telegram. All of those applications disguise themselves as you sending something to somebody else. You're really sending something to a server. The question is like, okay, well, whose servers are those? It's coming at such an important inflection point for the future of our country tech. And to just have this conversation that seems to be manipulated to some end. It feels very manipulated. And to me, the future of our tech is needing to build this infrastructure now if we're crippling it. The internet was designed to connect people directly. Today, much of what we do online passes through someone else's server, along with an enormous amount of data about us. In this episode, A16Z's Joel De La Garza sits down with internet infrastructure pioneer Barrett Lyon to talk about DocsNet his attempt to rethink that architecture from the ground up Barrett explains why VPNs aren enough how DocsNet enables encrypted peer communication without a central server sitting in the middle and why the company owns its infrastructure all the way down to the hardware. They also discuss what happens when decades of online tracking meet cheap AI, why Barrett thinks internet protocol development has stagnated, and what it would take to bring back some of the openness and experimentation of the early internet. Well, today we're joined by Barrett Lyons. perhaps one of the most interesting people in tech. I have a lot of stories to share, and I am always kind of blown away every time we catch up because you tell me a new story that just puts everything I've ever done in ailing comparison. And I think the most interesting one I heard recently, and I had never heard it before, and this was during a period, I believe, where we were investors in your previous company, was you are a pilot, you have a pilot's license, and you decided to optimize your life by flying places. And you had an unfortunate experience I believe, flying back from one of our meetings. Yeah, well, I mean, one day I was driving to work in the Bay Area and I realized it was almost 45 minutes, which used to be 15. And my family lives up in the Tahoe region So I like well I think the plane can fly there at about the same time Maybe I could just commute that way And that was before work from home was like codified by COVID So I had like a need to physically be present So yeah, I started flying. So your daily driver was a daily flyer. Right. Yeah. So I put 1,300 hours on a Cirrus. And yeah, one day after a meeting here, I left and got in the plane, took off from San Carlos and somewhere over Oakland Airport, engines started acting up. And I thought maybe it was like some sort of water and fuel or something, but I climbed up, cleared Bravo, and felt like I was okay. And then right after that thought, lost pretty much all power. And what went through your head immediately after that? Yeah. Actually, I messaged my friends and said, Hey, guys, I have an emergency. Love you. I don't know. I just declared emergency and just tried to think, okay, where do I crash and not hurt people? I found a field and then it turns out, I was up pretty high and there was a giant airport right next to us, not Oakland, but it was Buchanan Field, I forget the name of the town, and it's a giant old military airport. Oh, in Alameda. No it was the other one The other one on the other side of the mountain range there Buchanan Field is the name of it I believe But anyway I landed there But before that I kind of went to this field and I was like all right well I got a parachute ballistics parachute Do I pull it? And I was thinking, all right, well, when I read all these crash reports, the reason the pilot dies is because they didn't use the parachute. So I'm like, well, the airport's right there, and I'm still in the air flying. And isn't that a funny quirk of that plane, that it's technically the safest plane ever made, but yet it's involved in the most crashes because people never use the safety feature? Yeah. Well, and I mean, it does work, but it destroys the plane, too. So it shoots a rock out of the back of the tail and rips all this stuff out and ruins the plane. And then it's not a guarantee that you're going to land nicely on the ground. And in fact, the seats, I think, are made with a crumple and packed thing. So when you do hit the ground, it absorbs the compression. And this is all playing out over how long a period of time? Oh, I don't know. Probably like minutes or less. Maybe less. Anyway, I just made the call to land and landed, rolled right onto the transient parking spot. I was calm. I was kind of frustrated and a little confused when I got out of the plane. And then those big firetruck things, the huge ones that look like some kid made them, but they're big. The guy gets out of that, shakes my hand, and then that's when the fear hit me because I'm [5:00] It's the guy scraping my brains off. I'm like, oh, no. This is the guy that puts the fire out. That was close. Then I'm like, now what do I do? I have to get home somehow. I rent a car, drive home. That was kind of the end of it for me. I was like, the risk is too high. And I kept the plane for a while and ended up ferrying it out to Las Vegas and selling it. Did you ever find out what the issue or the cause was? Yeah, it was like three really weird things at the same time. valve or kind of a lever broke off and sucked into the air intake manifold. And then it went down to the oil pan and it was crushed into cylinder three and six, I think. Oh, wow. And then that caused an electrical problem with something with the spark, which was controlled by a brand new electronic ignition system. Mm-hmm. That stopped working. And so then I lost half ignition. And then at the same time, my magneto on the other side, which is the backup, also stopped working. Oh, wow. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So it was like three, it was like a cascading, strange failure. And then it was also weird, too, because on the ground, the magneto was kind of working a little bit. So it would start, but then when you went to higher RPMs, it just went bye-bye. So anyway, yeah, so that's what it was. It took a while to figure it out. But... Thank you. Yeah, that was an interesting drive home. It happens. Yeah, now you understand why the Pope kisses the ground when he gets off the plane, right? Yeah. If there's ever another plane in my life, it will have less moving parts. Hopefully a backup pilots and redundancy. Yeah, yeah. And you fly a lot. You're increasing your risk level a little bit. Yeah. And that sort of probably triggered a lot of things. I know we're here to talk about your new venture, different for you. It seems more like a more close to home, more important. And so maybe we can talk a bit about docs and why you decided to build. Well, first of all, what is it? What caused you to do it? And kind of maybe you're thinking around why this is important. Why now? Okay, so DocsNet, first of all, maybe I should explain the name. As a kid, my hacker name was Docs. And then I started a business in high school with my high school friend called DocsNet. It was before cloud, and we were renting server products. basically giving user accounts for money. Totally legit business in high school. We're making pretty good money. Were these shell accounts? Yeah, shell accounts. So we were selling shell accounts for $5 a month, but we had a thousand users. And we had all these features and people liked it. And there was actually a little community around it for a while. Got out of high school and shut it all down and started my career. But I kept a domain. And also I'm very fascinated about protocol design and the fact that the internet has really kind of stagnated a bit from protocol design. There's not a lot of new stuff. All of it's built on top. So there's that. And then just noticing the shift of censorship and people's privacy being eroded and all of this kind of thing kind of, and then the uprise of VPN made it really interesting to make a kind of an alternative network. Yeah. That, yeah. kind of is designed from the ground up to protect people from advertisers, trackers, malware, and foreign adversaries trying to, learn about what you're doing. Well, I mean, the original promise of the internet was this incredible marketplace of ideas, unrestricted, no censorship, right? I think a lot of original, or a lot of the original people around the founding of what became the internet were free speech maximalists. And it was sort of a very specific crowd. And I think over the last couple of years, that to your point is, has shifted pretty incredibly, right? Yeah, and it's in the hands of a few. So, you know, for example, China's a good example. It was China.com, China.com. And those companies, Or is it China Network? Yeah. Anyway, either way, it's a pretty good chokehold of the entire population using that network as an opportunity to force people into different decision making processes. And the Internet originally, like you said, is kind of designed with this like open kind of concept. or something like that. It was like wireless through packet modems and things. But now we have really high powerful Wi-Fi on the edge, incredible connectivity, opportunities to create better mesh protocols and better P2P. And kind of really one of the biggest stains of the entire internet is carrier grade NAT. It's just destroying applications' ability to do really cool stuff. And erasing that is kind of what I'm trying to go for. Gotcha. And also, I think one of the interesting things is we always talk about sort of foreign governments restricting internet access, right? We harp on China and Russia. But I was in a state recently that has a know your customer rule. And [10:00] they were requiring or blocking access to certain websites, whatever they define as being inappropriate. It could be a health website, it could be whatever. And so we're actually seeing the creep of kind of this censorship, even within the United States. Yeah, it's creeping into the U.S. And it's being done in a way that's kind of odd because... A lot of times they're asking the network to solve problems. identity problem. And the network doesn't do identity. It has a hammer. It's going to hammer the nail. An IP address is not your driver's license. And Asking people to do network restrictions based off of age and things like that, it makes a lot of sense, but in a different place in the stack. You know, if they want to restrict people things for certain reasons and that should be done in a much different way and not asking the network to do it. So yeah, I think that we're starting to see that in the United States. We're seeing it definitely elsewhere. Um, And it's also not just with like age restrictions, but a interesting problem popped up the other day where Google or a Cisco umbrella broke for like a major carrier because they classified that carrier as France. They're not, even in France, really, as far as their corporate structure goes. But France had a rule requiring them to block like 100 plus piracy sites. And they said, no, we're going to go scorched earth. We're just going to block France. Well, then there's the blast radius of that, which is, okay, well, then if your geo provider accidentally identifies somebody's wrong location, then you're part of that policy. Oh yeah. And it's terrible. Those, those classifications are always the worst. I mean, we were looking at, we were looking at an investment opportunity in a company that makes chatbots that are focused on more like partnership type stuff or companionship type stuff. And half of the classifications engines classified it as adult content. Right. And you're just sort of like, okay, well, this is like a legitimate e-partner, e-spouse site. It's not doing the untoward stuff. Yeah, we've run into that a little bit too. Dox, because it's got two X's in it, and then also there's doxing. Yeah. But it actually worked out in our favor because we got flagged, I think, with Claude. And then we applied with the proper means to go through their... the registration process, and they opened up everything for us. Oh, nice. That's great. And so maybe, I mean, I think so... You know, this creeping sort of, the creeping information totalitarianism has given birth to a whole bunch of products of which we know we're all super familiar with, right? And VPNs is probably the most common. And so maybe it'd be great to hear a little bit about sort of why the existing tools aren't enough. Why are you building docs? How is it different? Maybe we could double click a bit on sort of your thoughts around it. Yeah, sure. Because that's the interesting part. I would say, are just entry and exit points. So they lease a server... from a landlord and set up their software on it. And then you connect to it encrypted, and then your requests and things that you do on the internet come from that node. And that's to solve your IP address as your identity problem. Yeah, it kind of is a way around that, I guess. But it's also kind of people feel like there's more security to that. And I could argue against that. But Um, It's very basic. If you think about it, those networks are real-time adjustable. You could apply APIs to everything, and all of a sudden you could say, all right, well, here's an API that your agent can use that can build an entire network. And you're just using the VPN protocols as a way to get into that area. And then inside, we can create either, you can call it a walled garden or a parallel internet or wherever you want to call it, but we built an entire mesh network, You can register domains, you can lease IP addresses. You can lease mesh addresses or public addresses create policy all within like milliseconds. So it's a whole different ecosystem in there. And then on top of that, we've been able to use that system since we can kind of control it to create P2P applications that actually work. So like phone calling, video call, chat, all of those things that sit best of class on top of the app run across the mesh network and it's all encrypted. Gotcha. No phone numbers, no nothing. So it's funny, it's funny, and that's phenomenal, because I think we're both pretty well steeped in the security space, and I think I come from sort of a, I've had it drilled into my head that if you want to have a private conversation, don't do it anywhere with anything with a battery or [15:00] electrical signal, right? Right. And so what you're saying is you've actually built this sort of like transient way for folks to connect and chat without there being any record. Yeah. So... You create your account, you just have to prove you're human by doing a little puzzle. Once you do that, you get a token that's yours. You can change it. You can delete your account, make a new one. But once you're in there, you can create a certificate and share it with a friend. You don't really know you're doing it. It just says, you invite friend and it looks kind of like normal. But it's actually doing a cryptographic exchange with each other. And then you have extra privileges. I think the key lesson of PKI was actually if you tell people it's PKI, it's not going to work. You have to kind of abstract that layer away, right? private key, it's not public. So anyway, you and your friend decided, okay, we trust each other. Now that unlocks the ability for the phones over the mesh network to talk to each other directly. And then all of a sudden you have all these really cool file transfer stuff, which has no file size limit. The really big problem is on WhatsApp, Signal, iMessage, Telegram, and by the way, Telegram's creepy. All of those applications... disguise themselves as you sending something to somebody else. But you're really sending something to a server, and then the server is then having the other person pull that. So if you upload a file, you're uploading it. And also the upload infrastructure isn't always as distributed, or it might even be a little bit slow. You might be in one part of the U.S., and you're uploading it to another, so the upload's a little slow. So... When we use our applications, it extracts all of that. It's gone. So it's really no middle of man, no server in the middle, and your phone becomes a server to your friend. And it's fast. It works great. You can send 20 gigabyte file to each other. Wow, 20 gigabytes, private network, point-to-point, no latency. Wow. With like three layers, four layers of encryption. Gotcha. So, yeah, it's post-quantum. And, I mean, these are really nice tools to have. Yeah. So I know when you start stacking up all of these things, it's Docsnet is kind of like this giant toolkit for freedom of speech, I guess. Freedom from surveillance. Yeah. Yeah. We should talk about that, too. Which is what's interesting. I mean, you mentioned that, you know, Telegram is creepy. I, I, I, uh. I would say I think I find all... It just seems like a lot of the VPN, I don't want to say all because that's an absolutist term, but it seems like a lot of the VPNs are very creepy, right? And without bashing on anyone specific, I think for me, the most illustrative story was in the news. There was actually an issue where a bunch of organized criminals were arrested across the world. Australia, I believe, had arrested some. The U.S. had arrested some. to organized criminal groups. And so these guys are like, don't trust Signal because that's the NSA. Let's use this app because this is safe and only five people use it. And it turned out that they all got indicted and I think most of them are in prison now. And so like in the U.S., right, we've seen this activity. And then if you look on any app store and you look for VPN, you probably find 50 VPNs that are all free to abroad. Well, yeah. If it's free, there's nothing free. If you're not paying for it, you are the product. You're being eaten alive. You know, the United States has pretty cool laws. We can use them to protect people. And so DocNet's U.S.-based, but we also have a Swiss company that handles all of European operations. So there's separation between the operations between the two companies. regions, we're doing other regions like that too. So it's corporate governance actually matters in these types of situations. But I just don't feel comfortable with my data going to a company that doesn't talk about who owns it. why they exist other than privacy. We made a very conscious decision that we're very open about what we're doing, who's involved, why the decisions have been made those ways. And it's also kind of to drive community, too. But yeah, there are creepy VPNs out there. Oh, yeah. Really creepy. And, you know, and it's not just, I mean, it's funny because we like to talk about nation states. We like to talk about intelligence agencies, right? Like CIA, NSA, these are all super cool. But in reality, like the risks are a lot more low level than that, right? For some of these, there were instances at the beginning of the initial cryptocurrency, currency waves where people's accounts were getting drained and they were using some of [20:00] that were in other countries. And it turns out that, like, you know, in some of these countries, you have the meshing together of the intelligence state apparatus in organized crime, right? And so you see where these things start to bleed into each other. Yeah, I mean, and then people... look at the policies for the VPNs, like, oh, no logs, no this. And the question is like, okay, well, whose servers are those? Are they... Owned by... big brand VPN or are they leased? And if they're leased, who are they leased from? And what are those people doing with the data? And what are their policies? But there's that whole underbelly. And... Learning about that has been difficult because I personally was not up to be building infrastructure all over the world as rapidly as I could. But I ended up realizing that that was, you know, if it's not your equipment, you can't set policy. It's just you can't. And then the next layer of policy is the carriers and interconnect beyond your network. cage or whatever it is. So it's been an incredible amount of work to work around The bare metal as a service kind of creepy underbelly. And this is like one big difference with, I think, a lot of folks, right, is that you own the full stack from like software to wire. Yeah, software to wire. And even all the AI components that run routing and things like that are all on our metal. Well, I think that was one of the funny things, I think, when we originally started talking about this was – You were incredibly distrusting of large inference and AI providers. Yeah. And you've built your own AI stack. Yeah. And so, I mean, GPUs are in shortage. Power is hard to get. Everybody's anti-data center now. How did you pull that off in... Probably six months. Very efficiently. Well, I mean, we built, so far, it's like 26 sites around the world with redundant routing. And how many employees in the company? Yeah. Total, I think the people involved is 12. Yeah, wow. Yeah. Okay. And we have no network administrator, no sysadmin. It's all done by AI. Wow. And it's actually working quite well. I kind of, I'm kind of on top of it. The nice thing, though, if you think about our footprint of, like, who's involved, you know, we don't have a thousand employees with access to this network. Yeah. Me. you know, the, the, uh, the blast radius of, uh, just the corporate structure is very minimal. Yeah, no, that's, that's impressive. And I think, you know, the, I think the thing we very rarely talk about because it's kind of uncomfortable is just how great an extent insider threat is. Yeah. And how it's like the most crippling, catastrophic cyber attacks are always sort of the insider threat angle. And now you're saying with agents, you're eliminating at least a good portion of that race. Yeah, and it's running in its own secure environment that's not exporting data to one of the big AI companies. So all the contacts and inference and stuff stays inside. And we have it secured, and we monitor all our equipment with cameras, and no one goes in and touches anything. Do you have agents that watch the camera footage? Actually, well, I mean, technically we don't, but the camera companies that made the agents do. Gotcha, gotcha, gotcha. Yeah, we get alarms if something moves and something goes around. But we even thought about putting lasers in a couple of the spots. Trying to make it Mission Impossible style? I'm like, why not? It'd be kind of fun. Yeah. You've got to have the one data center that you take people to to impress them, right? Like the Switch data centers in Las Vegas. They've got the Jeeps with the .50 cal machine guns on them. lasers and I did this big anyway long story short uh we did look into it and even got the the um late, uh, uh, actuated switches. So if the beams did break, it would actually set off the alarms and things. But, uh, just the problem was the data center doesn't turn off the lights. so you don't get to see this really cool display so like and there's no dust in there and there's no particles yeah yeah yeah so yeah you can't bring in some talcum powder because that'll mess up no it's like oh let's smoke up the data center for the laser show that's the other thing that's starting to be crazy is people like don't understand data centers at all. - Oh yeah. - It's crazy. - I mean, I think you're seeing that in the popular press, right? - Oh yeah. Oh, they drink water. - Yeah. - It's like, come on, no. The data center's been around for a very, very long time. And yeah, they need water when they break, and you have to replenish some of the water, and there's some evaporation, but it's not like they're running off of water. That's the crazy part. - Yeah, and it's just sort of like, I think in order of, like, most impressive machines humans have built, [25:00] One is probably commercial airliners, right? And two has got to be data centers. Like, they're so incredibly sophisticated. They're closed systems. Yeah, I mean, the data centers themselves are kind of just boring buildings. Yeah. And the other thing is, like, the sounds, I've never heard sound outside of a data center before. Yeah. Maybe... a chiller or something, but I see videos where people are watching videos and it's like, look at how it's audio from inside being dubbed and people aren't smart enough to know that it's fake. Yeah, I mean, yeah, that's all contained with inside these things. People are being manipulated with this data center thing. Isn't it amazing, right? to some end. Yeah, but it's very interesting to be in the know and then watch this and then go, oh my goodness, these people are missing the mark. Have you seen, I mean, because you've been to 20-something data centers in the last couple months. Have you seen actual protesters outside? No. Yeah, I know. I haven't like... No, you see nothing. It's just most of them, especially like the big data center park in Virginia, you know, you just see bunny rabbits in the field. Yeah, yeah, yeah. It's just a big building and a bunch of parking lot and nothing. Totally. Nothing. Yeah. Meanwhile, that's like one of the richest counties in the country because of all the data centers, right? Right, because it brings jobs. The people that work in them aren't getting paid pennies. And... And it also brings high tech talent, and then also infrastructure, and infrastructure powers everything you do. So if you have a data center nearby, your internet's faster. Things like that work better, depending on which one it is. And then the argument about data centers drinking water goes back to some quote that was fabricated entirely. Well, I think there was this switch data center built near Reno, and they built this big lake. out there. And people... think that it lives off the lake. And the reality is, you know, if say you have a chiller failure and you have to drain all that closed system out, you need to refill it. Yeah. Drain it to the lake. Yeah, so anyway. Yeah, it's a... It's interesting to see people like, I know I work in these buildings and then you see the conspiracy theorists and it's like, oh no, we're way off here. I'm sorry. This feels just like the people that think the moon landing was faked or like, it just feels like classic sort of, but, but. I do think it's coming at such an important inflection point for the future of our country, tech, society in general, and to just have this conversation that seems to be manipulated to some end. It feels very manipulated. And to me... The future of our tech is needing to build this infrastructure now. Yeah. And if we're crippling it, then we're making bad decisions. Yeah. And we're making bad decisions on Instagram posts. Oh, yeah. Or TikTok, right? TikTok. Which who knows where that content is being read. Or like some crazy anti-data center music video. Yeah. That's public opinion is being framed by that. Well, and this is the second half. I mean, I guess we had talked about sort of intelligence agencies and the big, bad, scary government, right? about clearly an operation that's probably being done by some sort of commercial interest to manipulate public opinion. Yeah. Right. Which goes to kind of the second half of why you built docs, which is like, advertising. Oh, yeah. Which is sort of like people like to think the NSA is incredibly sophisticated, but advertisers are probably far ahead of what they're doing. And I think you're seeing now where intelligence agencies are actually using data brokers and using the techniques of ad agencies. Yeah, so... Like all your apps have these trackers in them. WhatsApp has DIT.whatsapp.net. Apple even has Apple telemetry. They call it telemetry or metadata, whatever they want to call it, but it's, Some level of it is a tracker and you can block them. It doesn't break the app. It doesn't break. Most websites don't have any problem with that telemetry data breaking because the rest of the site was still low. But, you know, somebody asked me, very controversial, wealthy individual said, well, so what? Someone won't know that I purchased underwear off of target.com. And then I'm like, well, it's not really that one. It's all of them. on every different app that you're using or every different website. And it accumulates and then it's being stored by who knows who, where and being sold. And then when you aggregate all those data points together, you could know if you're a coffee drinker, what time you wake up in the morning, what your income is, where you shop, how often you purchase things. If you're preparing for the birth of a child or perhaps for a divorce or some other big life event. yeah yeah um So turning that off doesn't bother me at all. [30:00] I love all that stuff being turned off. I hate that kind of stuff. So that's a big piece of the app is the network. It's not just part of the app. It's part of the network is to kind of deconstruct all of that and get rid of it. And just kind of like the get back to the old Internet that has the ability to connect to things and has the ability to create. And then also, you know, not be spied on by advertisers and governments and everybody else. Well, and it seems like we're really at an inflection point because you have the birth of essentially coin-operated intelligence at scale, right? You can deploy millions. You've got the proverbial millions of monkeys with millions or infinite monkeys with infinite typewriters. And so we're sort of looking at this world in which there's more telemetry, there's more data. Everything you do is being tracked. arrive at some pretty scary conclusions. Yeah, you can take all that and just dump it into an LLM and say, tell me about this person. You get an answer. Probably do really effective targeting against things like data centers as well, right? Yeah. Like, you start to see these mass movements orchestrated across multiple platforms, and you start to think, like, huh, that's pretty clever. Yeah, but people should be targeting those. Maybe not the data centers, but the tracking is pretty bad. Ad tracking, it's, you know, that kind of stuff really... can go away and your life would be better. Yeah. So, yeah, at the core, it's like trying to recreate that vibe the Internet used to have and then see where we could take it. with bigger resources and things like that, you can start creating more protocols and things like that don't exist yet. Yeah, absolutely. I mean, the Internet succeeded because it was free. And so thank you for trying to make it free again. Trying. But you have to pay me. Yeah, exactly. Just kidding. Awesome. So I don't know if you know this, but our paths crossed a long time ago. I was looking back through some of my archives, and I did a lot of work – sort of in the early 2000s on DDoS bots. So Stockaldrot, TFN, TFN2K, and then obviously a large denial of service distributed attacks. And you were at the forefront of building a lot of the solutions to prevent that, like at Prolexic. Yeah. Like, how did that get going? Well, actually, it kind of goes back to DocsNet. In high school, people were attacking my servers. And so we had to figure out, better ways to protect them and techniques and tricks and all the different things you need to do to survive a DDoS attack. And I started writing... kind of my list of what you would do to survive. And then somehow I presented that at SANS. And then it got in Google. And then people started calling me. And then we started dealing with real cybercrime, extortion, people trying to take, you know, one company sells watches, the other sells watches, the other one is attacking the other watch company during COVID. Christmas sales season. Or, you know, Super Bowl is about to start and all the gambling sites go dark. Yeah. Things like that. And it got pretty serious. And so I built a whole company to protect... businesses from these attacks. And the way I looked at it is like, you need big scale. You need to have the biggest, most expensive stuff and not everyone could afford that. So we'll turn that into kind of a leased service as, you know, one of the first cloud services to exist. And it was pretty, very successful. Still exists today. It's Akamai Prolexic. They even kept the name. It's just rare. And then we did DefenseNet later on, which became F5 Silverline. all of that, I really like big scale stuff and bandwidth. And so the other one we did was called Big Gravity. And that was one of the first, or the first, video-centric CDNs. So big file, big object delivery. And we had some really great customers there early on. People got it. And then we had a lot of tech around it to save people money. People didn't realize it. Hit play and just downloading a progressive file. And before all of this kind of media management bandwidth just to scroll into the middle of a video. It costs people money. So anyway, we've created all kinds of cool stuff around video. And so as far as like building a new network for consumers, well actually and it's a little bit for bots too. There's actually a lot of agentic networking components to it. It's right up my alley because I love building big infrastructure, I love building scaled stuff. [35:00] Now it's kind of like twisting it. Instead of doing this for corporations, we're doing it for people. I haven't really seen a lot of that being done, at least well. So it's going to be fun to see kind of how people adapt to it. But... I think one of the more interesting things about that is we might even see some DDoS on our network. I'm sure you're ready for that. Well, inbound from the Internet. But what happens if somebody gets onto my network and starts using it inside and I have to deal with those silly people. The truth is, even if you have privacy, there's still laws and you need to. At least follow them as much as you can. I think one other interesting thing, and this is the kind of spending years talking with you. One other interesting thing is that you created an artwork that actually hung at the MoMA. And it's part of the permanent collection. There's two pieces. Yeah, college project. I studied philosophy. Oddly enough, I studied... That one does, yeah. Yeah, I studied... The art of aesthetics and some other stuff. A lot of it was theoretical AI. And I'm like, wow, actually a philosophy degree makes a lot of sense now. Totally. This is helpful. But yeah, I started mapping networks because I was a penetration tester. Ethical hacking into other companies. And I found that casing the joint was the easiest way to start. So you make a network diagram of where all this stuff is and how it all works and what you think is where. started automating that and then I got mouthy at lunch one day and bet some guys that I could probably use the same technique to map the entire internet and that started a $50 bet that I was pretty sure I was going to lose and then I got hit by a car on a bicycle oh okay yeah and couldn't walk and all of a sudden my life got really slow and I sat down and started doing the code for that MoMA, but like Boston Museum of Science all over the world and different traveling exhibits. And then I did, you know, animations of that too. And it's pretty neat because it's, that project has gotten a lot of attention, not just because it looks cool, but there's kind of really interesting history in the video as things are happening. You could see companies crash and burn and all kinds of stuff. And I was lucky enough to be able to talk to EventSurf about it and, to ask my questions to him, and it's pretty cool. That is awesome. And you've now done, you've probably accomplished two of the harder things to do in this world, which is one, starting a successful tech company, and two, being a successful artist. Being an artist, a successful artist is probably much more difficult than starting a tech company. Yeah, it was actually kind of strange. You know, after I went to the opening in MoMA, and it was, you know, this giant party. Yeah. And, you know, I was one of the artists. And, you know, they had a new exhibit and I had the piece in there and it was just kind of like, oh, man, this is kind of cool. There's a DJ, there's drinking. And then the curators, they took me to some really interesting parts of MoMA's other properties that they own. And it was a really cool experience. But the next day, I kind of had this imposter syndrome where I just felt super depressed. I'm like, wow, am I ever going to experience what an artist feels like ever again? Because this was kind of like accidental, you know? I got to do it again, but, but it was, yeah, it, Very strange, surreal moment in life. Probably the only person in tech that can say that. Yeah, it's interesting. I have a lot of artist friends that are probably much better artists than me. And they're all like, what? How did you get in the moment? Yeah, how did that happen? Yeah, and part of the permanent collection, too. Yeah, I know, I know. Which is neat. Yeah, you're one of a few hundred or thousand. Yeah. I forget about that sometimes. That is true. Yeah, we have not talked about the book. I don't know. Do you want to cover that? Sure. We'll throw this on the list of great stories. Well, I keep forgetting that it exists. Yeah. And... And recently, so I have an AI-powered webcam that watches boats in Miami. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. And it's 24 hours a day. It's been up for almost a year now. And it's got a little chat community of people on there. And one of them figured out who I was. And then the other day, they're like, I just finished reading the book about you. And I'm like, what? I'm like, what do you mean? I'm like, oh, shoot, that's right. They figured it out. So what is the book about you and what is it about? Oh, it's been so long. I think the beginnings of Prolexic and Translator, [40:00] down these cyber criminals in Russia. And specifically, these guys, there was like a couple of them, who were extremely aggressive, extorting and damaging a lot of our clients. Yeah, yeah. And so we just kind of had enough of it and said, this has got to end. I mean, we had Christmases destroyed because we were just dealing with customers and network outages. Well, and these are like real criminals. These are not just hackers. These are people that are doing human trafficking, they're trafficking narcotics, and they have a side hustle. There's some stuff going on, yeah. Yeah, yeah. real criminals, right? Yeah, and then they went to prison for, I think, eight years, hard labor or something like that. I don't know what happened to them afterwards, but yeah, that was really, we went out to Russia and got turned around. We were there in Moscow for a while, and then there was some really interesting signals of, like, you need to leave now. So we left. But yeah, that whole book is about that whole saga of what happened through that period of time. It's really weird because when you live it, Seems kind of normal, but then you look back and go, oh, geez, that was kind of crazy. I tell you, every time we talk, I hear new stories. Let's not talk about Burning Man. That could be a whole episode itself. Yeah. Actually, when was your first? Burning Man is next week? Yeah, it's this coming weekend. Yeah, coming weekend. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Are you going this year? Yeah. Awesome. I think it's year 14. Year 14. somewhere around there. I can't remember. We lost a couple of their, COVID, so I don't remember which ones I skipped. And you have a famous car. Well, my partner has the famous car. So Pablo created the Mayan Warrior, and I created the Mayan Warrior Camp. And so we were partners in that whole crazy thing for a while. And boy, that car went from a fun project to a whole global phenomenon. People paid money to go see it. It's crazy. What I was thinking about this morning is when you're passionate about something, it kind of creates that aura around you, and then other people pick up on it. And we were very passionate about that project. And I think it kind of inspired a lot of folks to do really interesting other projects that are similar to it. And this is the first year we're not taking it to the playa. Oh, wow. Not going. We're done. Will you be doing your laser show, though? Nope. Wow. All right. No. Well, there'll be something, but it's not mine. It's Pablo's got a beautiful art piece. There's two art pieces that he's bringing this year that'll be pretty cool. Awesome. But no more traveling superpower soundstage. That's gone. How's the vibe out there now that you can get Starlink internet access? It's actually, I mean, you can argue against it and you could argue for it. I find that if you're running, well, for me, like when you're organizing a camp oh, we ran out of water on our car, it helps because you can communicate. Yeah, totally. Because we always bring high-powered Motorola radios. Yeah, yeah, yeah. People are using shortwave too, right? Yeah, so you have the radios, and then that's kind of fun. It reminds you of being a kid. But it's also still a communications device. So out there, I don't know, it takes the edge off when it comes to finding things or organizing things. People don't get stuck at the gate very long anymore. watching movies that's probably the wrong use wrong use for it you don't go to burning man to netflix and chill no no if you're if you're using it for uh anything other than like local communications then maybe it's like the wrong wrong use but but it but it has changed a bit awesome well as you said right like you pursue your passion and that takes you down all sorts of amazing rabbit holes and you are clearly someone that is always pursuing his passion so incredibly happy DocsNet user. And thank you for building it. It's good to get that old internet vibe back. Yeah, well, it's just getting started. And thanks for trusting me to help build it. and share it with your friends and family. For more episodes, go to YouTube, Apple Podcasts, and Spotify. Follow us on X at A16Z and subscribe to our Substack at a16z.substack.com. Thanks again for listening, and I'll see you in the next episode. As a reminder, the content here is for informational purposes only. It should not be taken as legal business, tax, or investment advice, or be used to evaluate any investment or security, and is not directed at any investors or potential investors in any A16Z fund. Please note that A [45:00] Z and its affiliates may also maintain investments in the companies discussed in this podcast. For more details, including a link to our investments, please see a16z.com forward slash disclosures. Thank you. you