【Financial Education】纳指暴跌,历史即将在美股重演!

【Financial Education】纳指暴跌,历史即将在美股重演! — 浑水摸鱼清源

浑水摸鱼清源

AI-assisted summary of 【Financial Education】纳指暴跌,历史即将在美股重演! — original source. Check the original for full context.

Source published:

Key ideas

  • 美股科技股与高投机标的剧烈下挫,CoreWeave跌超10%,AMD跌超8%,Meta跌7%,而RH、网飞等消费与防御性资产逆势走强,市场风格出现显著分化。 (0:00)
  • 华尔街AI投资逻辑正从早期追逐动量转向关注自由现金流与变现速度,预计2027年全球相关资本开支将达到约1.4万亿美元的高点,届时增速放缓或对半导体硬件估值构成严重考验。 (22:15)
  • 美国成屋待完成销售指数跌至25年新低,若经人口增长调整则处于40至50年历史冰点,叠加耐克、Deckers等消费巨头业绩疲软,凸显居民端流动性极度承压。 (33:14)
  • 实盘操作展示防御性调仓:通过减持555股ServiceNow回笼约8.7万美元,并逢低分散买入Celsius(3.15万美元)、网飞(约2.4万美元)、美国运通(约2.2万美元)及Honest(1.05万美元)。 (38:15)

Detailed notes

## Background 该视频由BilibiliUP主“浑水摸鱼清源”于2026年10月23日发布。视频简介指出,在核心科技股遭遇集体血洗与恐慌蔓延的背景下,主讲人结合思科的历史走势解析半导体周期的残酷轮回,剖析美国成屋销售创25年新低背后的消费降级,并公开了卖出ServiceNow、加仓网飞与Celsius等标的的实盘操作路线图。

## TL;DR 节目深入复盘了美股剧烈震荡中科技股大跌与逆势防御标的的显著分化,主讲人直言纳斯达克经历20%以上的回调是洗除投机浮筹、让散户补上风险管理课的必要过程。结合Tom Lee等华尔街嘉宾的观点,视频拆解了AI基础设施投资的可持续性,并警示虽然短期内硬件芯片仍有反弹动能,但一旦2027年前后资本开支筑顶,半导体将重演历史上的周期性杀估值陷阱。宏观层面上,成屋待完成销售创下历史冰点以及鞋服巨头业绩疲软,坐实了大多数居民沦为月光族的现实困境;最后,主讲人公开了自己的调仓明细,逢高减持ServiceNow以套现约8.7万美元,并逆势买入网飞、美国运通、Honest以及大手笔加仓Celsius。

## Atmosphere & style 整期视频充满着实战交易者的辛辣与清醒,语气直截了当、毫不避讳对散户滥用杠杆与零日期权等投机陋习的严厉批评。讲解过程中还穿插了拉斯维加斯窗外遭遇龙卷风警报与暴雨的小插曲,主讲人拿自家玻璃房打趣的幽默化解了紧绷感,使整体呈现出一种既硬核严肃又生动接地气的个人脱口秀风格。从剖析宏观周期见顶的沉重警示,到落脚于真实账户调仓的从容布局,全片散发着穿越多轮熊市老手的淡定与底气。

## Bulletin - [00:00](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=0s) 美股科技股与高投机标的剧烈下挫,CoreWeave跌超10%,AMD跌超8%,Meta跌7%,而RH、网飞等消费与防御性资产逆势走强,市场风格出现显著分化。 - [22:15](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=1335s) 华尔街AI投资逻辑正从早期追逐动量转向关注自由现金流与变现速度,预计2027年全球相关资本开支将达到约1.4万亿美元的高点,届时增速放缓或对半导体硬件估值构成严重考验。 - [33:14](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=1994s) 美国成屋待完成销售指数跌至25年新低,若经人口增长调整则处于40至50年历史冰点,叠加耐克、Deckers等消费巨头业绩疲软,凸显居民端流动性极度承压。 - [38:15](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=2295s) 实盘操作展示防御性调仓:通过减持555股ServiceNow回笼约8.7万美元,并逢低分散买入Celsius(3.15万美元)、网飞(约2.4万美元)、美国运通(约2.2万美元)及Honest(1.05万美元)。

## Key takeaways - [00:00](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=0s) 科技成长股与二线投机云标的出现集体抛售,而具备防御属性与合理估值的消费和软件个股逆势走强。 - [01:44](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=104s) 盲目追逐热门投机标的(如CoreWeave)风险收益比极差,配置算力与云端赛道应优先选择亚马逊AWS或Meta等核心巨头。 - [05:44](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=344s) 纳斯达克指数经历20%以上的深度回调并非灾难,而是清洗滥用0DTE期权与杠杆ETF等投机陋习的健康洗盘。 - [10:00](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=600s) 合格的资本守护者应严守风险底线,回顾2022年暴跌历史,只有拒绝盲目保证金杠杆并深耕基本面的投资者才能穿越周期。 - [12:00](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=720s) 宏观流动性足以支撑长期AI基建,美国家庭年利息收入达7万亿美元,即便未来25年AI投资需30万亿美元也在承受范围内。 - [15:00](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=900s) 借鉴1997年思科暴跌50%后强劲反弹的历史,当前半导体硬件股更像被压缩的弹簧,未来两至三年仍有至少一到两轮大涨行情。 - [15:00](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=900s) 万圣节前后通常是美股季节性构筑底部的关键时间窗口,年底资金有望重新回流超跌的核心科技与芯片巨头。 - [20:00](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=1200s) 黄仁勋称算力行业仅面临营运资金不足而非需求破裂,但其作为英伟达CEO的利益立场决定了他必须全力托市以维持产品高溢价。 - [22:15](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=1335s) 华尔街进入审视资本支出与变现匹配的“二阶导”阶段,市场惩罚激进开支恶化现金流的企业,动量溢价被质量因子抹平。 - [25:21](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=1521s) 半导体板块不可避免地具有强周期性,一旦2027年资本开支见顶进入平台期,芯片硬件将面临严重的增长质询与估值下杀。 - [30:00](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=1800s) 吸取PC与移动互联革命的教训,半导体股票在盈利增速见顶后极易沦为长达5至10年的资金黑洞,切忌在周期加速末期追高。 - [33:14](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=1994s) 美国成屋签约销售按人口规模折算已处于40至50年冰点,7.5%左右的高房贷利率与严苛信审彻底冻结了置业流动性。 - [35:12](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=2112s) 从耐克与Deckers的业绩疲软可见居民非必需消费严重承压,多数美国人处于月光状态,难以支撑大额购房置业支出。 - [38:15](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=2295s) 通过锁定高估值SaaS股ServiceNow的利润,将筹码重组并逢低建仓Celsius、网飞、美国运通等具备长线现金流护城河的资产。

## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:00](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=0s) 市场剧烈分化:科技股遭遇血洗与逆势上涨的冷门资产

美股盘面上演了极具戏剧性的震荡走势,科技股与高投机标的集体承压重挫。CoreWeave 单日暴跌超过 10%,SpaceX 下挫逾 9%,AMD 跌幅超过 8%,Meta 下跌 7%,美光科技(Micron)跌幅亦突破 6%。面对如此剧烈的市场波动,博主指出本期视频将深入梳理市场走势、预判未来路径,并逐一探讨多个重磅市场话题:包括华尔街名嘴 Tom Lee 盘前两小时发表的最新市场观点、黄仁勋(Jensen Huang)针对新兴算力云(NeoCloud)强劲需求的讲话、当前 AI 资本开支究竟是狂欢还是临界点的争论,以及全美成屋销售创下 25 年新低的宏观现实。此外,视频还将披露博主当日投入数万美元买入的具体标的。

在科技权重股血流成河的同时,盘面另一端却展现出截然不同的图景。家居零售巨头 RH 在过去六个交易日内累计暴涨 29.6%,单日再度攀升 9.5%,“You would think this is the greatest stock market in the history of mankind.” 网飞(Netflix)当日逆势上涨 3%,赛富时(Salesforce)上涨近 3.5%,雅诗兰黛(Estée Lauder)涨幅也达到约 4%。这些冷门股票的强劲表现,与跌跌不休的 AI 投机概念股形成了极其鲜明的对比。

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Tech Sell-off vs Defensive Gainers accDescr: Divergence between plunging tech hardware/cloud names and surging overlooked value/consumer plays.

subgraph Plunging["科技与高风险标的深度下挫"] CW["CoreWeave (-10%+)"] SX["SpaceX (-9%+)"] AMD_ST["AMD (-8%+)"] META_ST["Meta (-7%)"] MU_ST["Micron (-6%+)"] end

subgraph Gaining["防御与冷门消费标的逆势大涨"] RH_ST["RH (6日暴涨 29.6% / 单日+9.5%)"] NFLX_ST["Netflix (+3%)"] CRM_ST["Salesforce (+3.5%)"] EL_ST["Estée Lauder (+4%)"] end ```

- **跌幅居前标的**:CoreWeave(-10%+)、SpaceX(-9%+)、AMD(-8%+)、Meta(-7%)、美光科技(Micron,-6%+)。 - **逆势走强标的**:RH(6 天内涨 29.6%,当日涨 9.5%)、雅诗兰黛(涨约 4%)、赛富时(涨约 3.5%)、网飞(涨 3%)。 - **营销活动预告**:thousandxstocks.com 即将在万圣节推出十月大促销,观众可通过置顶评论登记邮箱与电话参与。

---

[01:44](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=104s) 警惕“追逐发光物体”:投机陷阱与风险收益比失衡

很多投资者在配置上存在严重的逻辑误区,极易被市场短期热点所蒙蔽。以持续阴跌疲软的 CoreWeave 为例,普通投资者根本没有持有这种标的的必要。博主强调,在全市场浩如烟海的标的中,投资者必须时刻拷问自己的持仓逻辑:“Who wants that stock? Like sometimes you gotta ask yourself, Who wants a stock like that?” 如果想要布局 AI 算力与云计算赛道,直接选择亚马逊旗下的 AWS 更加稳健;如果想博取 AI 硬件的增长,AMD 也是更明确的路径;即便愿意承受高风险以博取高弹性,大举投入资本开支的 Meta 在风险收益比上也远优于 CoreWeave。

散户最致命的缺陷在于习惯盲目追逐所谓“发光的物体”(shiny object),误以为当前最热门的资产会永远上涨。例如,美妆个股 e.l.f. Beauty(ELF)在 6 月跌至 49 美元时无人问津,但随后股价实现翻倍有余;而那些在同一时期追高买入半导体存储芯片股票的投资者,至今账面却遭受惨重亏损。资本市场的常态是资产在超级牛市、深度熊市以及无利可图的“袋鼠市”(震荡市)之间不断切换。今天被众人唾弃、弃如敝履的冷门资产,往往会在猝不及防间迎来爆发性重估。

- **赛道替代方案逻辑**: - 云计算核心敞口:优先配置亚马逊(AWS),规避 CoreWeave。 - 风险成长敞口:优先配置 Meta,其风险收益特征显著优于同类二线算力投机股。 - **冷热标的反差案例**:e.l.f. Beauty(ELF)自 6 月 49 美元低点涨幅超 100%,同期盲目追高存储芯片股则承受巨幅回撤。

---

[05:44](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=344s) 纳指需要深幅回调:洗除投机陋习与长线投资者的成人礼

纳斯达克指数经历 20% 以上的深度调整不仅不是灾难,反而是一剂健康的猛药。博主在社交平台 X 上直言:“A 20% plus sell off in the NASDAQ would be really healthy. A lot of people need a lesson in risk management and having the stomach for sell offs.” 每天单边上涨的温室环境培养不出成熟的投资者,反而会纵容市场滋生极其危险的操作恶习。

当下大量投资者既不听上市公司的财报电话会议,也不亲自动手搭建财务模型去预测企业未来数年的营收、净利润、利润率演变以及合理的市盈率倍数估值,而是频繁依赖融资融券加杠杆、购买高倍杠杆 ETF,甚至沉迷于零日到期期权(0DTE)等危险工具试图在市场上“走捷径”。

纳斯达克指数下跌 6% 根本算不上真正的当头棒喝,唯有 20% 以上的暴跌才能彻底将投机者打醒,让市场看清谁在认真做研究、谁在裸泳。对于拥有 18 年投资经验的老手而言,牛熊转换早已是家常便饭,仓位结构在暴跌或崩盘来临前便已部署完毕。真正的长线投资者对大跌甘之如饴——例如网飞股价若能从 66 美元回落至 56 美元,只会提供以更低成本买入更多筹码的机会。

如果一个投资者无法承受连续两年的市场下行、无法承受整整一年的单边阴跌,或者无法面对纳斯达克指数在三个月内下挫 25% 的剧烈波动,那么就说明其心智根本不适合留在股市中。尽管类似于 2018 年底或 2022 年那样的深幅熊市回调未必是当下的基准情景,但市场周期终归需要这样一场残酷的洗礼来完成全面的情绪重置。

- **散户常见投机恶习**: - 忽视基本面:不听财报会、不做财务报表预测模型、缺乏严谨的 PE 估值分析。 - 滥用衍生品:动用券商保证金借款(Margin)、追逐高杠杆 ETF、重仓 0DTE 零日期权博弈财报。 - **核心市场法则**: - 纳指 6% 级别的调整无法出清投机浮筹,20% 以上的回撤才是重塑风险管理的“成人礼”。 - 面对极端波动的心理底线:具备承受市场连续单边下挫 1 至 2 年,或单季回撤 25% 的抗压能力。

[10:00](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=600s) 2022年熊市的惨痛教训与资本守护法则

主讲人回顾了2021至2022年美股经历的那场极度残酷的熊市周期。在2021年市场见顶后,纳斯达克指数从最高点一路深跌超过35%,整个科技板块遭遇无情血洗。他提醒投资者回忆当时的极端惨状:Meta股价从高位暴跌超70%,Netflix下挫逾70%,Shopify重挫超过80%,Tesla跌幅超过70%,而如今炙手可热的Palantir和SoFi在当时双双跌至仅剩6美元一股。“It was brutal. Everybody got smacked. I got smacked, man. And that set us all up for a multi-year bull run that's been insane.” 每个人都在那场泥沙俱下的暴跌中遭受痛击,主讲人自己也不例外。但正是2022年的这场深幅洗盘,为随后几年波澜壮阔的超级牛市打下了坚实基础,让坚守下来的投资者斩获了数以百万计的利润。

能够在这轮牛市中大获全胜,关键在于吸取了当年的教训,没有继续盲目加杠杆或沉溺于投机工具。主讲人表示,除了偶尔买入一些看跌期权(Puts)对冲投资组合外,自己坚决不碰保证金交易(Margin),也不去碰高风险的衍生品投机,而是扎扎实实地做功课——紧密跟踪财报、细听每一次业绩电话会议。2021年许多人之所以损失惨重,是因为盲目追逐那些只讲宏大叙事、根本没有确定盈利能力的泡沫垃圾股。市场通过暴跌给所有人上了一课:投资者必须学会成为合格的“资本守护者”(Good steward of capital)。如果整个市场资金泛滥,阿猫阿狗都能融到钱,资本就会被极度浪费;唯有把有限的资金集中配置到具备最优质风险回报比、基本面扎实的核心企业中,才能穿越牛熊。

- 纳斯达克从2021年高点到2022年低谷累计回撤幅度超过35%。 - 2022年熊市惨烈个股跌幅:Meta(-70%+)、Netflix(-70%+)、Shopify(-80%+)、Tesla(-70%+)。 - 知名科技成长股当时的低点:Palantir一度跌至6美元/股,SoFi跌至6美元/股。

---

[12:00](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=720s) 嘉宾访谈:AI基础设施长周期与资本开支辩驳

主讲人随后切入一段财经访谈视频(嘉宾为Fundstrat的Tom Lee与主持人Scott Wapner的对话),探讨当前市场围绕人工智能(AI)泡沫的激烈争论。针对“市场对AI开支的担忧究竟是在阻止泡沫形成,还是在刺破已经形成的泡沫”这一核心分歧,Tom Lee认为,眼下的担忧反而在健康地防范不受控制的投机狂潮。一方面,AI领域不断涌现出令人震惊的突破——例如OpenAI在两周前攻克了770个数学难题、智能体(AI Agents)的加速落地,表明AI技术远未走到生命周期的后半段,生产力红利还在持续释放。每一笔投向AI的资本都在孕育未来的真实回报。

针对资本开支过高、引发流动性紧缩的质疑,Tom Lee从宏观数据层面进行了驳斥。他指出,即便未来25年AI基础设施的总投资达到30万亿美元,宏观资金面上也完全承担得起——仅美国居民家庭一年的利息收入就高达约7万亿美元,从中每年拿出一万亿美元就足以覆盖AI的建设开支。作为横向对比,历史上的移动通信网络建设花费了约25万亿美元,全美公路网的修建也耗费了约25万亿美元。AI作为比移动网络更基础、更关键的底层生产力革命,消耗相近量级的资金完全合理。与此同时,压制市场的宏观逆风正在消退:美联储从极度鹰派转向潜在鸽派,一度触及5%甚至引发6%恐慌的美债收益率已显著回落。空头将美股科技七巨头(Mag7)以及英伟达、存储芯片等核心标的当成拥挤的做空工具,但随着去杠杆和做空达到极致,这批龙头标的已逼近卖盘力竭的底部。

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 基础设施投资规模横向对比 accDescr: 对比全美公路网、移动通信网络与未来25年AI基础设施预估投资规模

subgraph Historical["历史级基建投资规模"] Road["全美公路网络建设<br/>约 25 万亿美元"] Mobile["全球移动网络网络搭建<br/>约 25 万亿美元"] end

subgraph AIEra["人工智能时代展望"] AI["未来 25 年 AI 基础设施投资<br/>约 30 万亿美元"] Capital["资金来源保障:<br/>美国家庭年利息收入 ~7 万亿美元<br/>仅利息即可支撑年均 1 万亿开支"] end

Road -.->|"同等量级投入"| AI Mobile -.->|"底层生产力跃迁"| AI Capital -->|"充沛流动性支撑"| AI ```

- AI基建资金承受力:美国家庭每年利息收入总和约7万亿美元,提供巨大流动性缓冲。 - 历史基建成本参照:移动通信网络建设累计约25万亿美元,公路系统投资约25万亿美元。 - 宏观流动性转向:美债收益率自5%上方的高位回落,美联储货币政策基调正逐步由鹰转鸽。

---

[15:00](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=900s) 思科历史剧本、半导体周期与万圣节后反弹契机

回归视频,主讲人深入剖析了科技股的超跌现状与反弹逻辑。针对半导体指数(SOX)和DRAM存储芯片ETF近期经历的大幅下挫,Tom Lee在访谈中援引了互联网泡沫初期的经典案例:在浏览器普及、公网爆发3年左右的1997年(类似于如今ChatGPT推出3周年的节点),当时的领军股思科(Cisco)因美联储主席格林斯潘提示“非理性繁荣”及潜在加息预期,曾遭遇高达50%的腰斩式暴跌(股价从高位跌至5美元附近),但在一年后便狂飙至18美元,实现两倍以上的惊人反弹。

主讲人对这一历史类比深表认同,并进一步展开自己的推演。他严厉告诫那些企图在暴跌中割肉离场、判定AI芯片周期已经彻底终结的悲观散户:“Slow down. Okay, slow down. My guess is all those types of stocks still have at least one or two more big runs in them before this cycle really has problems.” 主讲人明确指出,尽管半导体行业具有周期性,未来两到三年后确实可能遭遇利润率见顶和每股收益(EPS)萎缩的泥潭,但绝不是现在。在短期内,这批优质硬件和芯片股更像是一根“被极度压缩的弹簧”(Coiled spring)。

对于后市的演变路径,主讲人指出,只要不重演2018年底那种单边暴跌的极端极端行情,每年万圣节(Halloween)前后往往是市场构筑底部的关键时间窗口。一旦11月和12月迎来反弹,资金将第一时间重新涌入此前领涨的核心科技股:AMD、美光科技(Micron)等存储芯片股,以及Meta、亚马逊(Amazon)等巨头。虽然防御性板块(如公共事业、医疗保健以及废弃物处理板块Waste Services)近期的补涨反映了避险情绪浓厚,但在中期选举不确定性出清、科技股触及关键技术支撑位后,市场大概率将迎来一轮强劲的普涨反弹。

- 历史镜鉴:思科在互联网爆发第3年曾因加息担忧暴跌50%至5美元,随后在一年内强力回升至18美元。 - 周期时间表:芯片巨头的真正利润率与每股收益见顶危机距离现在至少还有2至3年。 - 反弹催化窗口:万圣节前后通常是市场季节性底部的转折点,年底科技成长股具备极强的向上修复动能。

[20:00](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=1200s) 黄仁勋的资本论调与英伟达的“啦啦队长”立场

针对当前人工智能领域的发展瓶颈,视频引述了英伟达(NVIDIA)CEO黄仁勋(Jensen Huang)的公开观点。黄仁勋认为,AI的底层需求极其强劲,各行各业对算力与内存的需求并未动摇;行业眼下面临的唯一短缺是支撑这股庞大扩张势头的营运资金(working capital)。在黄仁勋看来,由于需求远大于当下的资本供给,这一缺口终将被解决,因为这些企业正在创造前所未有的核心价值。在硬件架构层面,黄仁勋尤其为存储芯片站台,强调内存永远不嫌多,无论系统架构如何动态调整资源,高带宽内存(HBM)乃至 LPDDR 都将在未来数年内持续被重用。

主播对黄仁勋的言论进行了客观且犀利的拆解。主播直言,黄仁勋无疑是极具远见且极为聪慧的企业家,“Whenever he speaks about subjects, you should absolutely understand he's likely the most educated person in the room in relation to that.” 但投资者必须清醒地意识到黄仁勋强烈的利益相关性:英伟达眼下扮演着整个AI狂欢的“首席啦啦队长”。为了维持英伟达自身的增长动能和极高的产品溢价能力,黄仁勋必须确保所有人都能取得成功——无论是超大规模云服务商(hyperscalers)、新一代AI云平台(Neo clouds),还是内存供应商。一旦有云厂商撑不住倒下,对英伟达芯片的需求就会随之萎缩;唯有持续制造巨大的行业狂热,英伟达才能继续对其产品“要什么价就是什么价”。

- 黄仁勋的核心判断:AI行业遭遇的是营运资金供给不足,而非终端需求或商业模式破裂。 - 硬件架构与内存需求:系统架构可调配资源,但HBM等存储技术的刚需在未来数年将持续存在。 - 主播的风险提示:黄仁勋言论具有极高专业度的同时带有深度的商业偏见,其立场要求他力挺生态链中的每一个参与者以维持芯片高溢价。

---

[22:15](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=1335s) AI第二阶段的分化:资本支出、自由现金流与“二阶导”困局

访谈节目进一步探讨了市场对AI叙事态度的转变。从2022年底ChatGPT横空出世以来,投资逻辑经历了几轮演变:最早是盲目买入“美股七巨头”(Magnificent 7),随后演变为在超大规模云厂商与半导体硬件之间进行二元选择。而到了当前阶段,这些粗糙的分类已彻底过时。市场正步入一个更为复杂的“分化期(trickier phase)”——单纯加大AI投入已不再必然推升股价,甚至连提供“镐头与铲子”(picks and shovels)的基础设施股也不再享有普涨待遇。

投资者与华尔街机构正面临严峻的“二阶导数问题(second derivative problem)”,即资本支出(Capex)的增长斜率与AI变现速度的匹配程度。当前的惩罚机制十分微妙:华尔街既会惩罚那些在AI上投入过少而可能掉队的公司,又会无情抛售那些资本开支过激导致自由现金流(Free Cash Flow)严重恶化的巨头。市场选股的重心已从盲目的“动量(Momentum)”重新收敛回“质量(Quality)”。此前二季度动量因子对质量因子的超额收益高达35个百分点,而如今这一溢价差距已几乎被完全抹平。

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: AI投资逻辑演进与二阶导困局 accDescr: 展示市场从早期盲目追逐动量到当下关注自由现金流与资本支出可持续性的演进过程。

subgraph Phase1["阶段一:早期狂热 (2022末-2023)"] A["ChatGPT问世 / 追捧Mag 7"] --> B["二元配置:云厂商 vs 半导体"] end

subgraph Phase2["阶段二:精细分化与二阶导审视 (当前阶段)"] C["资本开支与变现匹配"] --> D{"自由现金流检验"} D -->|"Capex过高 / 变现不足"| E["杀估值 (惩罚负现金流)"] D -->|"Capex过低 / 恐被淘汰"| F["遭遇市场抛售"] D -->|"变现覆盖Capex / 高质量"| G["质优股胜出 (Quality回归)"] end

Phase1 --> Phase2 ```

- 宏观资本体量比照:《金融时报》(Financial Times)指出,当前各大超大规模云服务商在AI基础设施上的合计预期资本支出,已经堪比整个荷兰的经济产出总量。 - 估值与因子变动:第二季度动量风格对质量风格的35%领先优势已基本抹平,盲目追逐强势股的策略失效。 - 选股核心锚点:重点转向自由现金流动态,筛选那些AI商业化收入能够切实覆盖资本开支扩张的企业。

---

[25:21](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=1521s) 资本开支筑顶隐忧与半导体周期的残酷回归

市场普遍预计,到2027年全球相关资本开支可能达到约1.4万亿美元,较当前水平接近翻倍,但这很可能意味着本轮激进资本开支扩张周期的顶点。一旦这一庞大的资本支出进入增速放缓的“平台期(leveling off phase)”,整个半导体及算力硬件板块将迎来最惊心动魄的时刻。主播警告称,这种支出增速的见顶将把巨大的恐惧注入半导体板块:“When you get that leveling off phase, it's definitely going to be a scary moment for the semiconductors.”

投资者终将清醒地意识到,巨头们的钱袋子不是无底洞,不可能年复一年无休止地拔高资本投入。届时,市场将对英伟达的后续增长率提出极度严苛的拷问,存储芯片公司的定价权也将遭到严重侵蚀。相对而言,博通(Broadcom)受到的冲击可能会温和一些,而AMD由于在未来几年内具有抢占市场份额(market share stealer)的独特身位,虽然同样无法完全幸免,但受波及程度会相对较轻。

与会分析师同时提醒,半导体虽然在全球范围内交出了营收暴增88%、毛利率攀升至80%以上的惊人成绩单,但这种暴利绝对不可持续。不能被所谓“半导体从此摆脱周期性,成为长期稳健成长股”的论调所蒙蔽。这是一场极其强大、历时数年的大型资本开支周期,但它在本质上依然是周期性的。未来的超额回报必须由基础硬件端轮动扩散至实体经济中的实际AI采用者(AI adopters),通过广泛的生产力提振带来十年年化7%的股债回报。但在当下财报季,大多数传统行业对于AI带来的实质性生产力改善仍言之过早。主播在此处严厉警示大众投资者切勿在周期顶点重蹈覆辙:“I'm going to save you a lot of money right now. Listen very closely, okay? People are going to say things like...”

- 资本开支峰值预期:2027年资本支出体量或达1.4万亿美元高点,随后将不可避免地迎来增速放缓与平台期。 - 个股抗跌分化:支出筑顶时,英伟达和存储芯片巨头将承受最强烈的增长质疑与估值下杀;博通相对温和;AMD凭借抢夺份额的独立逻辑所受冲击较小。 - 周期本质与板块轮动:半导体行业80%以上的毛利率无法永久维系,未来行情的接力棒必须从“卖铲人”交接到各行业通过AI提高利润率的“应用采纳者”手中。

[30:00](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=1800s) The Semiconductor Cycle Trap and Lessons from the Mobile Revolution

The speaker pushes back hard against the prevailing market narrative that the artificial intelligence boom guarantees an endless supercycle for chipmakers. While bulls argue that surging demand for memory, compute, and data center capacity makes semiconductors an automatic multi-year winner, the speaker insists that history demonstrates the exact opposite trajectory for hardware cycles. To illustrate, he points to the mobile revolution that kicked off around 2008. The widespread adoption of smartphones, laptops, and tablets became a reality across the globe, with the speaker noting that he has six separate mobile devices sitting right on his desk. Yet, despite this forecast coming true, hardware investors who bought after the initial hype cycle were left empty-handed.

Mid-explanation, the broadcast is humorously interrupted by a violent storm outside his window in Las Vegas. Alarmed by local tornado warnings, the speaker momentarily halts the show to inspect the weather, joking about the structural vulnerabilities of his home: “And I just realized my house is not built for a tornado because the whole freaking thing is like glass.” Relieved that he was not sucked down to the Las Vegas Strip, he refocuses on his core investment thesis regarding cyclical tech waves.

Returning to the mobile and PC revolutions, he warns that semiconductor equities frequently become dead capital for five to ten years once earnings growth peaks, even while underlying end-market unit volumes remain robust. Investors make the fatal mistake of chasing hardware manufacturers after their peak acceleration rather than before. Summarizing the timing required for this asset class, the speaker stresses: “You've got to get in the semiconductors before they go through the huge wave.”

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Technology Hardware Supercycle Trajectory accDescr: A flow chart illustrating the cyclical trap of semiconductor stocks across historical technology waves. subgraph Wave["1. Initial Expansion"] A["Emerging Tech Catalyst (PC, Mobile, AI)"] --> B["Surging Capex & Component Shortages"] end subgraph Peak["2. Peak Earnings"] B --> C["Hardware Stocks Experience Parabolic Wave"] C --> D["Earnings Growth Decelerates / Peaks"] end subgraph Trap["3. Stagnation Trap"] D --> E["Stock Multiples Compress"] E --> F["5-10 Years of Stagnant Dead Money"] end ```

[33:14](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=1994s) Housing Market at Multi-Decade Lows and True Affordability

Turning to the macroeconomic picture, the speaker reviews breaking data on the US housing market, where pending home sales plunged to a 25-year record low with demand falling nearly 16% year-over-year. Although the 30-year fixed mortgage rate had dipped by a few basis points, buyers completely failed to re-enter the market. The speaker argues that the headline 25-year low drastically understates the true severity of the housing freeze because the US population was dramatically smaller a quarter of a century ago. When adjusted for per-capita demographic expansion, current homebuyer demand is tracking at multi-decade depths, likely reflecting 40- to 50-year lows.

The discussion highlights that prospective buyers are locked out by a toxic cocktail of 7.38% to 7.5% mortgage rates, tight post-2008 underwriting criteria from lenders, and elevated home prices that refuse to buckle due to severe structural inventory shortages. Even though homes are lingering on the market longer and triggering scattered price cuts, the sheer lack of qualifying buyers keeps transaction volumes frozen.

- Pending home sales touched an unadjusted 25-year low, dropping nearly 16% year-over-year. - On a population-adjusted basis, housing activity is hovering around 30- to 50-year historic lows. - 30-year fixed mortgage rates sit between 7.38% and 7.5%, locking out borrowers unable to qualify under strict post-Great Financial Crisis lending standards. - Inventory levels are ticking up primarily because properties are sitting on the market longer rather than from an influx of fresh construction.

[35:12](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=2112s) The Consumer Reality: Shoes, Cars, and Paycheck-to-Paycheck Living

Addressing the "elephant in the room" that Wall Street analysts overlook, the speaker applies behavioral psychology to the real-world economic conditions facing everyday citizens. Purchasing or upgrading a home is the single most confident financial commitment an individual can make, requiring absolute certainty regarding long-term income prospects. That confidence is completely detached from reality when baseline consumer discretionary categories are collapsing.

Pointing to after-hours earnings from Deckers Brands—the parent company of Hoka and UGG—which recently lowered its full-year revenue guidance, as well as deteriorating operational figures from Nike and automotive dealerships, the speaker underscores that discretionary budgets are exhausted. If households cannot justify buying sneakers or couches, expecting them to take on an expensive residential mortgage is absurd. With 60% to 70% of Americans living paycheck to paycheck, record-high utility bills, natural gas heating costs, and gasoline prices have entirely swallowed up the typical $200 monthly buffer. Framing this disconnect between macroeconomic optimism and consumer reality, the speaker asks: “Have you seen Nike's numbers? People can't even freaking go buy new shoes, and you think they're gonna go buy a new house?”

[38:15](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=2295s) Portfolio Rebalancing: Trimming ServiceNow for Value & High-Conviction Buys

To close the session, the speaker walks through his live portfolio adjustments, detailing how he monetized gains in enterprise software to fund purchases in beat-down consumer and technology franchises. Having discussed ServiceNow extensively in his prior broadcast, he decided to lock in substantial profits by liquidating 555 shares, generating roughly $87,000 in gross cash proceeds.

He redeployed this capital across several high-conviction long-term ideas that present significantly more attractive risk-reward profiles than overextended cloud software multiples:

- **Netflix (NFLX):** Purchased approximately $23,000 to $24,000 worth of shares. - **American Express (AXP):** Allocated roughly $22,000, explaining that while he is cautious on consumer discretionary spending in the short term, AXP represents an elite compounder over a five- to ten-year investment horizon. - **The Honest Company (HNST):** Added $10,500 into this emerging consumer brand. - **Celsius Holdings (CELH):** Invested roughly $31,500 into the functional energy drink maker as his largest single purchase of the session.

Reflecting on his asset rotation, the speaker explains: “So that's why I took some profits on ServiceNow and it might take more, right?” He concludes by reminding viewers of an upcoming final promotional deal of the year for his educational stock platform before signing off.

## Notable quotes > [05:44](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=344s) A 20% plus sell off in the NASDAQ would be really healthy. A lot of people need a lesson in risk management and having the stomach for sell offs. — 浑水摸鱼清源

> [35:12](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=2112s) Have you seen Nike's numbers? People can't even freaking go buy new shoes, and you think they're gonna go buy a new house? — 浑水摸鱼清源

> [30:00](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN?t=1800s) You've got to get in the semiconductors before they go through the huge wave. — 浑水摸鱼清源

## Mentioned CoreWeave, SpaceX, AMD, Meta, Micron (美光科技), Tom Lee, Jensen Huang (黄仁勋), RH, Netflix (网飞), Salesforce (赛富时), Estée Lauder (雅诗兰黛), Amazon AWS, e.l.f. Beauty (ELF), Shopify, Tesla (特斯拉), Palantir, SoFi, Fundstrat, Scott Wapner, OpenAI, ChatGPT, Cisco (思科), Broadcom (博通), Deckers Brands, Hoka, UGG, Nike (耐克), ServiceNow, American Express (美国运通), The Honest Company, Celsius Holdings

## Video description 【Financial Education】 纳指暴跌,历史即将在美股重演! History is About to Be Made... [Stocks do this every 17 years]

科技股集体血洗与市场恐慌情绪蔓延 近期美股市场遭遇剧烈震荡,核心科技股全线重挫。盘面上看,CoreWeave单日暴跌超10%,SpaceX下挫逾9%,AMD跌幅超过8%,Meta下跌7%,美光科技(Micron)跌幅也超过6%。面对市场的狂风暴雨,许多缺乏风险意识的投资者频繁使用杠杆ETF或零日到期期权(0DTE),在频繁的震荡中付出了惨痛代价。正如历史经验所表明的,纳斯达克指数经历20%甚至更深幅度的回调,往往是洗掉投机浮筹、重塑成熟投资者心理的必经之路。

半导体周期的轮回与历史镜鉴 回顾上世纪90年代末的互联网革命,标杆巨头思科(Cisco)在公网爆发三年后的1997至2000年间曾遭遇高达50%的深幅回撤,随后在行业大洗牌中涅槃重生。当前由人工智能(AI)驱动的半导体和存储芯片浪潮虽然气势如虹,但随着资本开支(Capex)在未来一两年内逼近峰值,市场终将面临增速放缓和产能出清的阵痛。投资者切忌盲目认为半导体硬件需求将永远无休止地暴增,历史上PC和移动互联网革命都曾让部分半导体龙头在繁荣过后沦为长达数年的“资金黑洞”。

房地产25年冰点与实体消费降级 宏观经济层面,美国成屋待完成销售指数(Pending Home Sales)已跌至25年来的历史最低点。如果考虑到过去四分之一世纪美国总人口的大幅增长,当前的住房冰冻程度堪称40到50年来的最糟水平。与此同时,从Hoka母公司Deckers下调全年营收指引到耐克(Nike)等鞋服巨头的业绩疲软,无一不印证了绝大多数消费者正处于“月光族”的生存压力中。当居民连购买新鞋、新车的消费意愿都遭到抑制时,所谓的高端购房需求自然也无从谈起。

实盘大佬的大手笔调仓与抄底路线图 在动荡的市场环境中,实盘操作才是检验逻辑的唯一标准。近期我在实盘中果断采取了结构性调整,通过出售部分ServiceNow股票回笼约8.7万美元现金,并迅速将资金投向更具长期配置价值的优质资产:其中买入网飞(Netflix)约2.4万美元,增持美国运通(American Express)约2.2万美元,投资Honest约1.05万美元,并单日豪掷约31.5万美元重仓加仓Celsius。这些优质标的在经历市场泥沙俱下时,反而构成了长线布局的黄金窗口。

可执行性操作指引: 严控杠杆与投机仓位:坚决摒弃零日期权(0DTE)和高杠杆ETF,在波动加剧期严格管理现金流与风险敞口。 甄别周期泡沫与优质成长:警惕半导体及AI硬件在资本开支筑顶后的周期回撤风险,优选具备强大自由现金流的消费与科技巨头。 逆势分批布局长线底仓:利用市场恐慌情绪带来的超跌窗口,逢低吸纳像网飞、美国运通等具备坚固护城河的优质标的。

简洁时间轴 [00:00] 科技股集体大跌与市场恐慌情绪综述 [01:44] 逆势上涨个股分析与散户投机坏习惯剖析 [05:44] 纳指20%回调的必要性与长期风险管理法则 [12:00] 深度剖析AI泡沫论、算力需求与宏观资本开支 [27:39] 借鉴思科历史走势评估半导体周期的未来走向 [33:14] 美国成屋销售创25年新低与实体消费降级真相 [38:37] 实盘调仓记录:售出ServiceNow并重仓买入网飞等标的

[Source](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Junt6YEqN)

中文简报

纳指暴跌,美股历史或将重演 节目深入复盘了美股剧烈震荡中科技股重挫与防御性标的逆势上涨的显著分化。主讲人认为,纳斯达克经历20%以上的回调是洗去投机浮筹、让散户补上风险管理课的必要过程。结合Tom Lee等华尔街人士的观点,内容深入拆解了AI基础设施投资的可持续性,并警示虽然短期内硬件芯片仍有反弹动能,但一旦2027年前后资本开支筑顶,半导体行业恐将重演历史上的周期性杀估值陷阱。宏观层面上,成屋待完成销售创下历史冰点以及鞋服巨头业绩疲软,坐实了大多数居民沦为月光族的现实困境;最后,主讲人公开了自己的调仓明细,逢高减持ServiceNow以套现约8.7万美元,并逆势买入奈飞、美国运通、Honest以及大手笔加仓Celsius。 美股科技股与高投机标的剧烈下挫,CoreWeave跌超10%,AMD跌超8%,Meta跌7%,而RH、奈飞等消费与防御性资产逆势走强,市场风格出现显著分化。 (0:00) 华尔街AI投资逻辑正从早期追逐动量转向关注自由现金流与变现速度,预计2027年全球相关资本开支将达到约1.4万亿美元的高点,届时增速放缓或对半导体硬件估值构成严峻考验。 (22:15) 美国成屋待完成销售指数跌至25年新低,经人口增长调整后则处于40至50年历史冰点,叠加耐克、Deckers等消费巨头业绩疲软,凸显居民端流动性极度承压。 (33:14) 实盘操作展示防御性调仓:通过减持555股ServiceNow回笼约8.7万美元,并逢低分散买入Celsius(3.15万美元)、奈飞(约2.4万美元)、美国运通(约2.2万美元)及Honest(1.05万美元)。 (38:15)

Reading summary

节目主讲人认为美股正经历科技股与防御资产的剧烈分化,纳斯达克指数需要一次深度回调来出清过度投机;尽管AI长期基建具有流动性支撑,但半导体等硬件端难逃周期律,叠加宏观消费与地产的疲态,投资者应转向审视现金流并聚焦高确定性标的。 市场两极分化与投机风险出清 (0:00) 美股盘面呈现极端背离:高风险及热门科技标的如CoreWeave跌超10%、SpaceX跌逾9%、AMD跌超8%、Meta跌7%、美光科技跌逾6%,而RH六日内累计暴涨29.6%、网飞上涨3%、赛富时涨约3.5%、雅诗兰黛涨约4%。主讲人批评散户盲目追逐热门“发光物体”的投机倾向,例如追高存储芯片却忽视像e.l.f. Beauty这类自6月49美元低点翻倍的冷门资产,在配置上AWS或Meta的风险收益比也远优于CoreWeave等二线算力公司。 主讲人指出,纳指常规的6%回调根本不足以唤醒市场,20%以上的深度调整才能重塑投资者的风险管理意识。回顾2021至2022年熊市,纳指累计下挫超35%,Meta、网飞暴跌超70%,Shopify重挫逾80%,当时Palantir与SoFi均跌至6美元,但正是这场出清奠定了后续多头行情的基础。长线投资者必须具备承受单边下行与单季回撤25%的抗压能力,坚决规避保证金杠杆和零日期权等投机工具,做好资本守护者。 AI基础设施争论与长期资本承载力 (12:00) 围绕当前AI资本开支是否存在泡沫的争论,访谈嘉宾Tom Lee认为眼下的担忧有助于防止过度狂热,且OpenAI的技术突破及智能体落地证明生产力红利仍在释放。针对巨额基建开支引发流动性收紧的质疑,Tom Lee从宏观数据指出,即便未来25年AI基础设施耗资30万亿美元,仅美国居民家庭每年约7万亿美元的利息收入便足以提供流动性缓冲,量级上亦与历史上的全美公路网(约25万亿美元)和移动通信网络(约25万亿美元)相当,同时美联储转向鸽派及美债收益率自5%回落也缓解了紧缩压力。 针对近期大幅下挫的半导体标的,Tom Lee援引1997年互联网初期的思科为例:当时思科因加息担忧暴跌50%至5美元,但一年后强劲反弹至18美元。主讲人认同这一逻辑,认为芯片股在短期内更像被极度压缩的弹簧,当前距离利润率与每股收益真正见顶至少还有两到三年时间,万圣节前后或是市场阶段性见底与科技核心股反弹的重要窗口。 资本开支平台期与半导体硬件周期陷阱 (20:00) 虽然英伟达CEO黄仁勋主张算力与存储需求并未动摇、行业仅面临营运资金短缺,但主讲人提醒投资者需警惕黄仁勋作为行业“首席啦啦队长”的利益相关立场。当前市场对AI的审视已步入第二阶段的“二阶导数问题”:华尔街不再单纯奖励巨额开支,而是无情抛售那些开支过高导致自由现金流恶化的企业,二季度动量因子对质量因子的35%超额收益已基本抹平,选股核心重回自由现金流质量。 随着各大超大规模云服务商资本支出预期堪比荷兰经济总量,市场预计2027年全球相关资本开支将达到约1.4万亿美元的高点并进入增速放缓的平台期。主讲人借2008年移动互联网革命的历史告诫投资者,即便终端设备普及,硬件股在业绩增速见顶后往往陷入5至10年的资本沉寂期。半导体行业80%以上的毛利率无法永久持续,一旦资本开支筑顶,英伟达和存储芯片将面临严苛的增长质询,未来行情必须轮动扩散至能产生实际生产力改善的应用采纳者。 宏观消费疲态与实盘组合调仓落地 (33:14) 宏观基本面上,美国成屋待完成销售跌至25年新低(同比下挫近16%),在考量人口增长的人均维度上更是逼近30至50年历史低点。尽管房贷利率略有回落,但在7.38%至7.5%的房贷利率、严格的审贷标准与缺乏库存导致的高房价压制下,交易依然冰封。与此同时,Deckers Brands下调全美营收预期,耐克数据疲软,汽车销售承压,约60%至70%的美国民众依靠薪水度日,水电燃气等刚性通胀彻底吞噬了月度结余,普通大众缺乏大额置业的经济底气。 基于估值收敛与风险收益考量,主讲人披露了实盘调仓动作:卖出555股ServiceNow兑现约8.7万美元利润,并将资金重新配置到具备长线确定性或深度调整的标的,包括买入约2.3万至2.4万美元的网飞(NFLX)、约2.2万美元的美国运通(AXP)、1.05万美元的The Honest Company(HNST),以及投入约3.15万美元建仓Celsius Holdings(CELH)。 本期节目梳理了AI从盲目狂热到聚焦自由现金流的逻辑演进,强调硬件周期存在见顶滞胀的历史风险,并指出宏观消费收紧将长期制约资产重估。未完全解决的焦点在于,传统企业利用AI实现利润率实质性提升的周期是否会滞后于硬件开支的见顶,进而加大市场震荡幅度。

Source quotes

[5:44] 浑水摸鱼清源: A 20% plus sell off in the NASDAQ would be really healthy. A lot of people need a lesson in risk management and having the stomach for sell offs. [35:12] 浑水摸鱼清源: Have you seen Nike's numbers? People can't even freaking go buy new shoes, and you think they're gonna go buy a new house? [30:00] 浑水摸鱼清源: You've got to get in the semiconductors before they go through the huge wave.

Original transcript

[0:00] We have drama, ladies and gentlemen, drama in the market. Look at some of these moves. CoreWeave down over 10 percentage points here today. SpaceX down over 9%. AMD down over 8%. Meta down 7%. MU, Micron down over 6 plus percent. We'll do some stock talk at the beginning of this video. Talk about what's going on here, where the market's headed from here. After we get done going through that, I want to share my thoughts about the best case scenario for the market. to this video here from two hours ago. Tom Lee sharing his opinions, thoughts about the market, and we'll go ahead and react to that. Then I wanna react to this one, Jensen, talking about he sees high NeoCloud demand. That should be an interesting one to react to. Wanna react to this one, AI spending boom or breaking point. Then I wanna react to this one, home sales hit 25 years low. We got all types of fun stuff to react to in this video here today. This has gotta be an action-packed video. Then we're gonna get into all the stocks I bought here today. which I spent tens of thousands of dollars on stocks here today. So we'll speak about that in this video here today. Action pack, ladies and gentlemen. I got to get rolling straight into this. So I appreciate y'all for being here. Just smash that like button if you haven't already done so. Less than 10% of people. Hit the little thumbs up icon for the... People that are in that less than 10%, I thank you so much for doing that. I hope you guys appreciate all the work that goes in all these videos and me trying to keep you guys up to date with everything going on. And man, there's always a lot going on, including its earnings season right now. Massive Halloween sale coming, by the way, on thousandxstocks.com. That will be a deal you want to take advantage of in the month of October, along with some of these stock deals as well. So that will be the pinned comment down there. Click on that. Put in your name and email or phone number. We'll send over the deal when it drops on Halloween. Okay. All righty. in here, hey, hey, hey, can we start with some good news? Can I share something good? Listen. RH stock. RH the past six trading days is up a whopping 29.6%. You would think this is the greatest stock market in the history of mankind. Look at that move, ladies and gentlemen. You're going to be flipping my flapjacks. way if you bought our age in the past like week or two you're looking pretty darn good. Pretty darn good. Wow, what a move there, okay? But stocks like that, are few and far between right now. You got obviously crowd, or not crowd strike core. We've continued to be insanely weak. I mean, that stock can't catch a break. It just can't catch a break. You know, um, Who wants that stock? Like sometimes you gotta ask yourself, Who wants a stock like that? Think about all the stocks you could invest in the stock market. Why would you want corn weave? There's just nothing exciting going on there. Like if I want to play, if I want to play the AI wave and Anything in relation to cloud, I'm going to play Amazon with AWS. I don't want to mess around with cord weave. Thank you very much. No, I'm good. If I want to play AI in general, like play AMD, it's just like, why would I want to even mess around with the core weed? So that's what you got to ask yourself sometimes, like when there's just such better opportunities. If you want to play something riskier in the AI space. Buy Metastalk. right you know they're spending fortunes of money but and it's definitely riskier or it's not riskier than core weave is less risky than core weave right but if you want to play something higher risk high reward play meta over our core weave any day So that's kind of the issue a stock like that has. It's like, why? Why even mess around with it? There's just much better risk-reward profiles out there. Now, I want to show you guys this definitely was some green out there. Look at RH today, up 9.5%. Netflix had a good day, up 3%. Salesforce continues to be very strong, up almost 3.5% today. Look at Estee Lauder. Estee Lauder for the people in the back, up about 4%. stocks I've been talking about this year A lot of those stocks did very well today, right? And no one's cared about those stocks because people will have this – Unfortunately, they can get very caught up into whatever is the shiny object at that particular time. So if there's like – if AI stocks go ones, like everybody pays attention to that and they see these other opportunities out there. Like you could have bought Elf back in June for $49, right? And you've over doubled your money. Well over doubled your money since then. Meanwhile, you could have also been buying memory stocks at that particular time and you're probably down huge on your memory stocks since June, right? Like, You could have doubled your money or you could have lost a bunch of money. Like, what do you want to do, right? But people tend to gravitate toward whatever has been the hot thing recently, and they think that's going to remain the hot thing, right? And it's like it's not how it works. Stocks can go through major bull cycles into a huge bear cycle or a huge kangaroo cycle where you make no money from it. [5:00] quite some time and these hated stocks then people are like you couldn't get me to touch these stocks next thing you know those ones are booming and people are like what happened here right um so just something to kind of keep in mind there you know it's just uh it's very interesting you know the dynamic in the market i've been in this game a long time so i just i see the waves coming you know i see the waves going and uh you know i just know how to position properly at particular times position at the right time. And most of the time I'm right about what stocks I'm right about. So, you know, it's just, that just comes with experience, man, and constantly being in the market and knowing what you're doing in this game. And this, I posted this on my X page here today, I said a 20% plus sell off in the NASDAQ would be really healthy. A lot of people need a lesson in risk management and having the stomach for sell offs. 100%. Like, that's the only way you build great investors for the long term. You don't build great investors by the market going up every day by being easy. A lot of people are in bad habits right now in the market. There's probably a lot of people that are watching this video right now. You're probably in bad habits. Are you listening to conference calls of all these companies? Are you running your projections on 1000xstocks.com? Oh, you don't have access to 1000x? Okay. Do you run in your own spreadsheets and run your own projections on where companies are? revenues are going over the next few years and their net incomes and their margin profiles and the p ratios those companies command and why they should command those are you doing all that work right and I bet you there's even a lot of people unfortunately watching this video right now you're not doing that work that means you're getting in bad habits. early on. You've got to get in the right habits. And so in order to unfortunately get people in the right habits, a lot of times you've got to get smacked. And once you get smacked around a little bit, that's what wakes you up and be like, okay. And so people get in really bad habits where they start margining on stocks, right? They're buying these leveraged ETFs that they have no business buying. They're going call options, right? They're doing these zero day options. Like there's all this risky stuff that they have no business doing. The only way you can get people to wake up and be like, that's not the way, you have to get smacked. And, you know, a 6% downward move for the NASDAQ is not getting smacked. You've got to get that 20% plus move. And then that's when you find out who are the people that are like, okay, let me get my stuff together. Let me really figure this out. Let me do this the right way versus the people that are going to fall by the wayside, right? And so it's a rite of passage. You've got to go through it. And I went through it before, right, because I got caught up in all the same crap that everybody else gets caught up into, charging out money or go on call options and do these earnings trades and whatever little hack I thought I had on the market for... Cutting corners and every single time ever try to cut the corners in the market the market eventually just slapped me in the face and that's what has to happen and so there's a there's a definitely a good approach. portion of investors that are not in the good habits and Like how somebody like myself look at this has been in the market 18 years. This is nothing. This is nothing. You know, I'm already so well positioned GBD. I position my portfolio way before you go through any sort of downturn in the market, whether it's a correction or crash, anything like that. Right. And I welcome it. You tell me if we can get the NASDAQ to go down 20%? I'm like, listen. Let's go. Gladly. I would love – I love buying Netflix at $66, but I would love to buy way more shares of $56. Like it's just going to make me a lot more money in the end, right? And for the people that can't take the short-term pain. You're not, you know, if you can't take the short-term pain in the market, that's another sign that... You're not built right for this. You've got to be able to take the short-term pain. You're going to be willing for the market to go down for two years straight. If you can't take that sort of pain, you can't be in this game. It's not meant for you. Because you are going to go through time periods when the market downtrends for two years. You are going to be in the market when it downtrends for a year straight. You are going to be in the market when the NASDAQ goes down 25% in three months. And... If you can't handle that, then, you know, you've got to get thrown out. It might not be for you. And so real investors, the real players, you can always take that and you'd be like, let's go. I can gladly take that. Right. So that's why, even though it's not necessarily my base case that the market falls 20% plus, I think if we did, and we're probably not going to have it happen, but if we did have a... 2018 type fall, that's the type of stuff that gets people set right, right? That's the type of stuff that resets everybody and says, ooh, okay. And so the people that made it through the 2022 bear market was brutal. [10:00] How many of you guys went through that market? Were you around in the 2022 bear market when NASDAQ went down 35% plus? Peak to trough from the peak in 21 to the trough in 22. Were you guys around when Meta stock fell 70 plus percent? Were you around when Netflix stock fell 70 plus percent? Were you around when Shopify fell over 80 percent? you know tesla fell over 70 were you around in that situation were you around when palantir fell to six dollars a share Around when SoFi was at $6 a share, right? Like... If you were around at that time, you know what it was. It was brutal. Everybody got smacked. I got smacked, man. And that set us all up for a multi-year bull run that's been insane. The amount of millions of dollars we've made since 22 is a lot of millions, right? And... We played it the right way. Haven't messed around with margin. Haven't been, you know, other than hedging the portfolio with some puts here and there. Haven't messed around with any major way in options or leveraged plays. Anything like that, right? We've done it the right way. We've been putting in the research, been keeping track of all these companies' earnings, listening to conference calls. We played it the right way and we've prospered. on the back of that, right? But we had to get smacked in 22 because a lot of us, including myself, we were in some bad positions in 21, taking way too much risk. We need to get smacked. And we got smacked. And that was something that definitely set us right and got us into great quality companies rather than some of these risky companies. You've got to be a good steward of capital. A lot of people, you know, they aren't a good steward of capital. Like that's a way of the market smacking you to kind of get you to realize like, you're You've got to really focus on the best companies because if everybody's getting capital, right, then capital is going to be wasted out there in the marketplace in a major way. It's about being in the best companies with the best risk reward profiles and being a good steward of capital and not just throwing your money and sloshing your money at companies. Everything because this stock has a story and like they might make some money someday, you know, like that's just a foolish Foolish game, okay? Alrighty guys, let's go ahead and react to some videos, and we'll get into all the stocks I bought here today. - Say that AI concerns are preventing AI from becoming a bubble. Some would suggest that these concerns are merely popping what had become a bubble. - Uh. God, I know there's gonna be two sides of that debate. But the reason I'm going to say AI concerns are preventing a bubble. is that we're continuing to see astounding discoveries made by AI. I mean, whether it's the muse and the agents, but maybe Two weeks ago, OpenAI and discovering 770 math problems. This is not the end or late cycle for AI discovery and even the productivity boost. So, as long as we're starting to see Vance is there. Every dollar of capital raised for AI is generating returns. I think it's actually really healthy that the debt markets are sort of preventing a runaway speculative boom in AI. So I think it's actually a very healthy correction that way. So you're focused more on the derivative impacts, I suppose you could say, rather than spending concerns, funding concerns, capital crunch concerns, all the above? Yeah, I mean, unfortunately, AI does require a lot of dollars. We did a report a few weeks ago showing that If AI is going to spend 30 trillion, Over the next... 25 years. One, there's actually plenty of investment dollars available, because interest income from just American households annually is about 7 trillion. a trillion of that can be funded by just the interest income earned by Americans. But... The mobile network build was about 25 trillion. And roadways are $25 trillion. AI is a more important infrastructure build arguably than mobile. It's about the same dollar. So I don't think there's too much money being thrown at AI today. Would you buy the sell-off yet? Yes. I think we're near the end stages of the sell-off because it's become a consensus short... to be. Sporting tech. And I think yields, which was really worrying markets, as you know, they've backed away. So I mean, you've got Two things that were headwinds before, the Fed, Quite hawkish now, it's flipping potentially dovish. And interest rates, which were touching 5%, people fearing 6%, are now back below 5%. I think the only things you have now is debt markets are kind of closed at the moment. And of course, the uncertainty about the war. I mean, would you if you say yes, I'd buy it? Where would you buy it? Would you stay just with these largest AI related stocks in the market? Yeah, I. Scott, I think that AI and the bottlenecks of the memories and the NVIDIAs and the Mag7, they're being sold because it is easy to short them now. And I think, of course, people are worried about the credit. [15:00] - I think they're bottoming. But I also like the software and I like the crypto here. Kind of the whole broad cyclical trade I'd be pretty bullish on. As you know, financials haven't been rallying, but rates are- Listen, if you want to know what stocks are going to boom, around Halloween and after. As long as we don't go into a 2018 scenario, right, and we have, let's say, a good November, December in the market, which is probably a base case, the stocks are going to do the best or all these tech stocks that had been doing. great before. Okay, so who is that? AMD. Micron, the memory chip companies, maybe NVIDIA to a little bit but not to big of an extent they'll probably even run back into some of the stocks like the Metas and the Amazons and some of those sorts of stocks right but it's gonna be the ones that have already been running prior right and now sold off big right and then assuming you bought them out this market right around Halloween or slightly before or slightly after and then you go into another upcycle they're gonna run back into the same stuff that was the moneymakers before so just something to kind of keep in mind there. So I think there's a lot of opportunity. This is what I view as a coiled spring because the fundamentals have been holding in. Wow, I mean, if you look at the semiconductor index or the DRAM ETF, for example, we'll show that one. There's so much destruction within that trade. I wonder what that chart, what story that chart is really going to be telling in the weeks, if not months ahead. Scott, I think it just shows you what a battle AI is today. Internet and browsers. Cisco, which was the biggest stock at the time, had a massive 50% drawdown, partly because Alan Greenspan was saying we had an irrational exuberance, and then later... kind of hinted at preemptive hikes not too dissimilar to today, Cisco went, had a 50% correction, went down to five. A year later was 18. I think the setup is similar. You know, ChatGBT is basically... crossing its third anniversary. I think we're so early in this AI trade It's understandable for people to be worried. I mean, a lot of people made money and there's a lot of profit taking as well. What about other areas of the market? So what he said there, I think that's really important. You know, if anybody wants to throw the talent on the whole move, I'm talking AMD, I'm talking the memory stocks and be like, it's over. *Sigh* Um... Slow down. Okay, slow down. My guess is all those types of stocks still have at least one or two more big runs in them before this cycle really has problems. Okay, so I mean, it's possible it's all over for all those companies and all their earnings are going to crash next year and the year after. I don't think that's too realistic. I think you're at least two years or three years out of those to margin problems, earnings per share problems, and those sorts of things. But it's not in the short term. And so that's where you're getting a big disconnect out there. And so... Like what he brings up there is the whole Cisco situation, the 50% drawdown. Next thing you know, stock triples up. And I'm not saying all the memory chip stocks are going to go triple up or something like that, but is it possible those stocks... you know, go up 50% in the next five months. I think it's possible, right? That doesn't mean I'm going to go buy them and go buy call options and margin out and do all that stupid stuff. But I'm just like, could I see how we could get there? Sure, sure. Sure. It's possible. Yeah, the market's broadened, but in a not so great way. Healthcare, staples, utilities, that doesn't exactly exude confidence in the market. No, yeah, to see Waste Services, which is a super defensive group railing, just showed the market's nervous. I'd say the half full argument is that that's also a breadth argument. But I did talk with Mark Newton. It does look like we're seeing... tech basically touching support. So I think We know that the next couple of weeks are uncertainty into midterms. I think this is the window where investors can buy things because... The market is going generally risk off, but I think post midterms, the market's going to rally broadly and very strongly. I mean, we did have Mark on yesterday, or not the day before, who said under the surface, the Qs and the S&P are stronger than it would seem. So we shall see. Tom, thanks. Tom Lee. Okay, next one up here, Jensen. The demand for the neoclouds is off the charts. Their capabilities are extraordinary. [20:00] And so what is missing in the middle is the working capital to fuel that growth, to fund that growth. And because there's just so much demand across so many sectors of AI, there's a scarcity of capital. The demand of the capital is much greater than the availability of the capital. That's going to get solved. And that's going to get solved because fundamentally the most important things are the values that these guys are providing, these companies are providing. The demand for it is so strong. Jensen's view there really it's not an issue about demand or the business model itself but access to working capital as well and of course as I mentioned . I don't think so. You know, one of the things that's really great about memory is that you could always use more of it. And of course, through architecture ideas, and NVIDIA owns the architecture of our systems, through architecture ideas, we could shift around the resources as necessary. But HBM memory will be used for years to come, and LPDDR... So, you know, here's what I would... takeaway from what Jensen just talked about there, okay? Listen. I'll give it to you both ways. OK, first off, Jensen, brilliant. You know, like we all know that, right? Like his success speaks for itself. And so whenever he speaks about subjects, you should absolutely understand he's likely the most educated person in the room in relation to that. Right. On the flip side, we also do have to acknowledge that he needs everybody really to be successful here to keep his whole momentum with his company going. clouds start to fail. then demand for NVIDIA chips starts to wane. And so he needs everybody really to be doing well. And so he's definitely a cheerleader. for the whole movement. We're talking about the big cloud companies, we're talking about the Neo clouds, even memory. Like he wants everybody to be winning right now. And there's just to be massive hype and excitement around AI because at the end of the day, that means he can command almost any price he wants for his company's products. It's as simple as that. Okay. And so, you know, it's kind of like, well, the weird situations where it's like, what he's saying is probably true and he's insanely intelligent, but at the same time, like he's definitely very, very biased. Um, so that is something we have to acknowledge. All right, let's get this next one. how clear that prison is right now? It's not entirely clear. I think what is clear is that there's very, very strong demand for AI as we see sectors across the economy start this long process of AI adoption. That said, what I don't think is clear for investors is how exactly that's showing up in terms of pricing and winners and losers. It's been about a year now, really since the year that we've been in this trickier phase of AI where more AI isn't necessarily a good thing for the specific stock prices of hyperscalers and now not even for picks and shovels. And I think it just means we're in a trickier phase where there's a lot more dispersion within these buckets, even if the demand itself is very strong. We are actually quite optimistic that five years, especially now where we have negative free cash flow, that's very tricky. And I think for right now, for the earnings season, it's really all about the second derivative problem, which is really the pace of capex spending and monetization of AI. What exactly does that look like in 2027? Yeah, it's interesting because it seems like we're in a market where investors are punishing companies that are spending too little on AI, but then they're also punishing companies that are spending too much on AI. How do you navigate that? That's right. And I think really what we've seen is when the story first started, we all started to really use ChatGPT in late 2022. It was easy. Oh, buy the Mag7. And then it became, oh, actually, let's migrate and think about hyperscalers versus semiconductors. And now even these discrete buckets are pretty anachronistic. And it's really within each one, within the hyperscalers, there's a lot more differentiation. the actual free cash flow dynamics, which companies at least isn't seeing any worse thing or even seeing some improvement in the free cash flow dynamic, meaning they're seeing more monetization than they're actually spending on the CapEx itself. Even within also the actual CapEx builders, you're seeing a lot more dispersion to very different than what we had in the second quarter. And there it's really about the [25:00] Sustainability of all of this capex spending and these very elevated gross margins, which every investor knows is not really sustainable besides the near term. So it's a lot more dispersion within. And we would really focus in, if you had to look at one factor, it's quality. Momentum was outperforming by 35 percentage points in the second quarter, momentum versus quality. And now that gap is basically closed because it's not so easy as just following these buckets, just following momentum. Yeah, being able to build all of this stuff. And I saw the FT noted today that if you put all the hyperscalers together, the amount that's expected that they're going to spend here on AI infrastructure rivals with the Netherlands total economic output, which is just a crazy, crazy statistic. How sustainable is that as you talk about this moment of transition that we're in from building all of this stuff to adoption here in the year ahead? So I think the big question is how much longer do we have in the acceleration phase of CapEx? year here where 2027 when all is said and done will probably be another year where we'll see about 1.4 trillion dollars in capex which still represents nearly a doubling but then after that it's kind of important to see some kind of leveling off of this big capex spend phase and just figuring out when exactly that happens and what the amount is that we level off at that's really where it's still very very hazy um when we think about so the level off phase is going to be really what specific stocks. I'll tell you what. the semiconductors. When you get that leveling off phase, it's definitely going to be a scary moment for the semiconductors. There'll be a huge level of fear that comes into semiconductors once you get that leveling off of the spend. which is still probably at least a year away. But it's because that's the moment where everybody's like, crap. These companies don't just have unlimited amounts of money to just keep upping, upping, upping, upping, upping the amount they spend year after year. And so that's when people really start to fear about NVIDIA growth rates moving forward, about the memory chip companies and what they can command for pricing moving forward. You'll even see it a little bit in AMD, although AMD is a market share stealer really over the next few years. They're kind of in their own game, but there'll still be even questions there. So everybody's gonna get the questions. Nvidia and the memory stocks will get it the worst though. Broadcom and AMD will get it less so. But they'll still get the questions too. It'll just be to less of an extent. And so... Just something to keep in mind there, ladies and gentlemen. Long term projections, we're actually quite optimistic that this all translates into a decade of higher productivity growth and hence more elevated margins. And that's really about the adoption of across sectors. So we think ultimately this translates to better expected returns for equities, actually for equities and bonds, where we forecast a 7 percent annualized return over the next decade. That's that's a big jump higher versus what we had been expecting the last decade. Does this then support the argument for a broadening out in the equity market? And if that CapEx acceleration were to slow, wouldn't that then hurt all of the picks and shovels companies, basically every sector that's getting propped up right now by this ramping up in the AI build out? And it's the rotation within the market that is set to change pretty dramatically here. They were up 88% on a global basis. You're seeing these incredible gross margins of 80% plus. But that's not sustainable. And I don't think we should get lulled into a conversation that on a secular basis, semiconductors are now very different. No, this is cyclical. It's a long, really powerful CapEx cycle. But eventually, it's going to peak. It's going to level off. The growth rate will slow. really benefiting the picks and shovels, but that has to change into the actual AI adopters themselves. Now, it's still too early. When we look at the earnings season, you're not really seeing quite yet companies talk about the actual tangible productivity benefits of AI adoption. It's going to be a process, but eventually we do think that shows up when we look at financials, excited about. Yeah, the place people make a big mistake when I say people, I'm talking investors, is in I'm sure there's a lot of you guys that are also going to make this mistake, unfortunately. Okay, listen. It's a big, big, big, big mistake. I'm going to save you a lot of money right now. Listen very closely, okay? People are going to say things like... [30:00] We need to build out a lot more We need a lot more memory. We need a lot more of all this stuff over the coming years. And so therefore, semiconductors are the way. Okay, and so No, that's not how it works. Okay. I can take you back to every single technology cycle we've ever been through. And they were all massive. I'll take you back to the mobile revolution. Okay. Mobile revolution. Not that long ago. This was just a little over a decade ago. Oh my gosh. everybody's going to have a mobile device. It came true. Everybody, everybody, everybody watching this, you're probably watching this on a mobile device right now, right? Everybody's got laptops and tablets and smartphones and all these mobile devices now all over the world, right? Huge mobile revolution occurred from like 2008 to 2008. you know to that next decade and now you know it seems like everybody's got mobile devices if not a bunch of mobile device i mean just on my desk right here just on my desk i've got one two, three, Four, five, six. six mobile devices Right on my desk right here, right? It happened. And so the assumption could have been, hey, you know... Like, we're going to have this mobile revolution. It's going to be massive. What is going on out there? Tornado? Holy smokes. Oh my goodness, crazy out there. Oh shoot! It's getting crazy. Hold on. Hold your horses. They've been warning about tornadoes in Vegas. I think it's here. All right, I'm back. It was crazy, man. We had a crazy, crazy storm situation just occur here. And people have been warning about these tornadoes hitting the West Coast. And I just realized... my house is not built for a tornado because the whole freaking thing is like glass. And I'm like, I can't even hide anywhere in this house. Like the tornado is just going to suck me up. I'm gone, man. I'm going to be straight down to Las Vegas Strip. It's going to suck me all the way down there. Um, I don't remember what point I was about to make. I think it was, oh, in relation to the mobile revolution, I think we were talking about. And, um, So people thought the semiconductor stocks were safe because, like, so many more people are going to be buying smartphones and tablets and all those sorts of things. Most of those semiconductor stocks, after their first and second, like, huge waves, ended up being huge money stocks for, like, the next five to ten years. Okay. And so they had a huge upcycle, and then earnings would then slowly start to peak. And then people didn't buy those stocks, even though those companies still were making great profits. laptops and every other mobile device out there and you know uh watches took off and like all this stuff happened And yet so many of those semiconductor stocks end up being huge money stocks. And then you go back to the PC wave, same exact situation. And obviously this situation will be no different. There will be people making these assumptions about, oh, demand in a lot of these stocks will end up being huge money stocks. And like people won't make any money in them over like a five, ten year span. They'll be like, what the heck? You've got to get in the semiconductors before they go through the huge wave. Okay, that's a really important thing to understand there. All right, let's go ahead and react to this one. Today, any glimmers? We're going to razor down a cheesy bell? Okay, well, not surprising. In fact, the hope was, okay, we saw last week's average on the 30-year fix actually drop back for- The averages which moved differently, but last week they fell. Did home buyers get in there for more demand? No, they did not. In fact, demand dropped again and is down close to 16% year over year. And we might have. So pending home sales hits 25 year low. The crazy thing of that is. It's way worse than that, right? 25 years ago, dramatically less people lived in the United States than live in the United States now, right? So just understand... Ooh, if you were to take population into account in relation to the situation, we might be at 30 or 40 or 50 year lows. It's really, really bad. Be more responsive. But I guess it shows that when rates are this high, it just takes more than a couple basis points of a drop to get people going again. Yeah. And it's not just this kind of emotional feeling about, OK, rates are over 7 percent, whether it's 7 and a half or 7.38, which I think they hit today. But it's more a lot of people don't qualify at this level. monthly payment but qualifying by the lenders who as we know are much more strict since the great recession and financial crisis. But it's also home prices are just not giving any help at all. They continue to be higher year over year and that's because we still have this supply issue not enough. We were talking to the Compass CEO about that the other day and a few different people who are saying they're starting to see more prices being cut. Do you think that that's going to get things to move a little bit more price cuts or the inventory that's sitting there is starting to come down? well so there is [35:00] inventory on the market now. We're getting into the season where you see more inventory, and there's more inventory simply because homes are sitting longer on the market, so that builds it up. But overall, we're still short several million homes for the demand that's out there. Yeah, but they're also not talking about the other big thing, right? Prices matter, right? Rates matter. Absolutely. But we're missing the elephant in the room, okay? Do you... Listen, I took a lot of psychology courses. You want me to teach you a little something about human psychology? Let me teach you a little something about human psychology, okay? Listen. When somebody goes to buy a new house, it's the most confident financial decision you can ever make in the respect of you don't go buy a new house and usually people are going to move up, right? They're buying a bigger house, a nicer house, spending more money, right? unless it's like a you know retired person then they might go down but for most people they're buying up, right? You don't make that decision unless you're insanely confident about your financial situation and your financial future, right? So, Listen, did you see Decker's earnings after the bell today? They just took down their guidance. They may have a bunch of different shoe brands. They have Hoka and Ugg and a few other brands, right? They just took down their whole guidance for revenue for the year. Hmm. Have you seen Nike's numbers? People can't even freaking go buy new shoes. and you think they're gonna go buy a new house? You can't buy new shoes, but you're going to go buy a new hat. So we can talk about price, we can talk about rates, blah, blah, blah. But at the end of the day, dude, if you can't go buy some new shoes, If the shoe companies are having trouble hitting numbers, right, and have demand problems, You think somebody could go buy a new house? A new house? What are we talking about here, right? Have you seen the dealership numbers? They're bad. Dealership numbers are bad. And so, you know, people can't go buy a new car. You think they're going to go buy a new house? Of course not. So this is where, you know... to understand a little bit about the real world and real world economics. I think that matters, right? When people can't go afford to buy shoes, then maybe they can afford to go buy something more expensive than that, like a new couch. And then if they can afford to buy a new couch, maybe they'll be able to afford to buy a new car. And then if they can afford to buy a new car, maybe they'll be able to afford a new house. But come on, man. You know, like... You've got to understand Most people are living paycheck to paycheck. That's just a reality, right? A smaller percentage, maybe it's 30%, maybe it's 40% of the population actually has, you know, a significant amount of money at the end of each month, whether that be, you know, 800 bucks a month or $2,000 a month or something like that, maybe 30%, 40%, something like that. But most people are living paycheck to paycheck. And then when all of a sudden you get hit with, you know, gas prices are the most expensive ever in the history of the United States and natural gas prices and people's heating bills are the most expensive they've ever been and this and this and this, right? Suddenly, if you already didn't really have any leftover at the end of the month, what are you going to be in that situation now? If you had $200 extra a month, now you're using it on gas, gasoline and natural gas to heat your house or heating oil or whatever. Now you don't have anything leftover to go to the restaurant anymore. to go buy that new pair of shoes or this or that, right? So, you know, that's something we've got to acknowledge, okay? All right, so let's talk about some stocks I bought here today. So, first off, I ended up taking a huge profit on some ServiceNow shares. So sold... was it 555 shares there was about $87,000 in proceeds. And with that money I bought Netflix. I bought... 23 almost 24 000 in netflix about 22 000 of american express i bought 10 you know when it comes to a company like american express it's not because i'm bullish on the consumer short term i can tell you that much it's more just like that's a phenomenal company being over the next five ten years right honest i bought uh ten thousand five hundred dollars worth of honest today and then celsius the wealthiest i bought uh thirty thirty one and a half thousand dollars of celsius here much better than ServiceNow. So that's why I took some profits on ServiceNow and it might take more, right? And I spoke about ServiceNow extensively in the video last night, okay? Alrighty, guys, hope you enjoyed today's video. I got a huge deal coming for you guys for 1000xstocks.com. Make sure you guys get access to that. It's well, well worth the price. And I love to throw a deal out there. And so we got an amazing deal coming. It's our last deal of the year. So make sure you take advantage of that. All right, guys, much love and have a great day.