【你能接受孩子啃老吗?】半数年轻人工作后仍然靠父母接济,究竟是大环境不好?还是孩子不努力?真相可能跟你想的截然相反!#啃老 #就业 #经济 #教育

【你能接受孩子啃老吗?】半数年轻人工作后仍然靠父母接济,究竟是大环境不好?还是孩子不努力?真相可能跟你想的截然相反!#啃老 #就业 #经济 #教育 — 纪实万象

纪实万象

AI-assisted summary of 【你能接受孩子啃老吗?】半数年轻人工作后仍然靠父母接济,究竟是大环境不好?还是孩子不努力?真相可能跟你想的截然相反!#啃老 #就业 #经济 #教育 — original source. Check the original for full context.

Source published:

Key ideas

  • 国际劳工组织(ILO)数据显示全球 13 亿青年中有 2.67 亿人不上班不读书全靠父母,北京大学中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)亦显示中国适龄劳动力依赖父母的比例从 2010 年的不足 2% 飙升至 2018 年的超 40%。 (11:18)
  • 当代青年难以超越父辈的财富鸿沟根源在于房产红利终结,老一辈依靠商品房制度红利积累起主要资产,而年轻一代仅凭工资收入在城市中已基本无法独立置业。 (13:27)
  • 马未都指出“全职儿女”与“雇佣保姆”存在本质鸿沟,家庭内循环充斥着亲情之爱与无法替代性,使父母即便出资也难以彻底行使支配权与训斥权,但金钱依附常演变为加倍的心理控制与唠叨。 (3:14)
  • 北欧芬兰通过高税收高福利机制将青年失业救济与老人护理直接转交政府承担,代际之间实现“无利益纯爱”,但该模式受限于国情人口,中国约 90% 老人仍必须依赖家庭居家养老。 (6:56)

Detailed notes

## Background 该视频由 YouTube 频道“纪实万象”于 2026 年 11 月 1 日发布。视频内容源自窦文涛主持的深度文化闲聊节目《圆桌派》,本期聚焦当下年轻人“啃老”、做“全职儿女”的社会现象,结合青年就业困局、经济环境与家庭教育等多元议题展开探讨。

## TL;DR 节目围绕当下青年就业困境与“全职儿女”现象展开,窦文涛与马未都、许子东、幼婷等嘉宾深入拆解了代际经济依赖背后的社会根源。嘉宾们对比了北欧的高福利托底机制与东亚的家庭代际互助模式,指出在房产红利终结与阶层流动放缓的背景下,年轻人依靠父母资助往往是现实所迫而非单纯偷懒。对谈进一步探讨了金钱与家庭控制权、代际心理创伤、亲子边界感以及精神独立与经济独立的辩证关系,最终落脚于接纳代际互助、理解至亲局限并完成内在自我的和解。

## Atmosphere & style 整场谈话呈现出《圆桌派》一贯的从容、机智与包容,嘉宾们在轻松诙谐的调侃与严肃尖锐的社会观察之间自由切换。从分享个人育儿崩溃、家庭“反目”的生动糗事,到引述赵州禅师公案与西方心理学理论,现场氛围在笑声与深沉的反思中层层递进。观众不仅能感受到对当代困顿青年的深切共情,更能体会到两代人在爱、控制与边界之间撕扯的真实心理底色。

## Bulletin - [11:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=678s) 国际劳工组织(ILO)数据显示全球 13 亿青年中有 2.67 亿人不上班不读书全靠父母,北京大学中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)亦显示中国适龄劳动力依赖父母的比例从 2010 年的不足 2% 飙升至 2018 年的超 40%。 - [13:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=807s) 当代青年难以超越父辈的财富鸿沟根源在于房产红利终结,老一辈依靠商品房制度红利积累起主要资产,而年轻一代仅凭工资收入在城市中已基本无法独立置业。 - [03:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=194s) 马未都指出“全职儿女”与“雇佣保姆”存在本质鸿沟,家庭内循环充斥着亲情之爱与无法替代性,使父母即便出资也难以彻底行使支配权与训斥权,但金钱依附常演变为加倍的心理控制与唠叨。 - [06:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=416s) 北欧芬兰通过高税收高福利机制将青年失业救济与老人护理直接转交政府承担,代际之间实现“无利益纯爱”,但该模式受限于国情人口,中国约 90% 老人仍必须依赖家庭居家养老。

## Key takeaways - [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=4s) “全职儿女”正在演变成一种家庭内循环模式,部分年轻人通过承担照料三餐、医疗预约及数字操作等家务劳动,使代际金钱与劳务互助理直气壮化。 - [03:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=194s) 雇佣保姆基于纯契约可训斥解雇,而全职儿女依附于亲情之爱,父母天然处于无法严苛问责与无限托底的被动地位。 - [06:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=416s) 芬兰的高福利制度切断了代际间的经济索取,失业青年与失能老人直接对接国家救济与社工护理,使亲情互动摆脱了利益捆绑。 - [10:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=603s) 中国约 90% 的老人选择居家养老,国情与文化决定了北欧式的纯政府托底在短期内无法替代传统家庭纽带。 - [11:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=678s) 全球年轻一代面临阶层停滞,美国超 65% 的 Z 世代和逾 74% 的 00 后认为自身财务积累速度显著落后于父辈同龄时期。 - [13:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=807s) 房产成为中国家庭财富的绝对载体,错过了住房改革黄金期的三十岁以下年轻人仅凭薪水几乎无法完成资产超越。 - [15:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=943s) 父母奋斗的终极价值在于赋予子女“选择的权利”,而合格的家庭教育要求父母克制依赖、体面退场,允许子女不回头地走向广阔世界。 - [20:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=1209s) 接受父母资助买房或全额生活补贴往往伴随着高压心理规训,年轻人在愧疚自责与被干预私生活的夹缝中进退两难。 - [24:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=1467s) 人生由金钱与时间两种货币构成,呆在家中空想无法探明志趣,唯有走出家门经历低谷与人际碰撞才能像游戏升级般“解锁”新潜能。 - [28:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=1687s) 部分现代家庭演变出“商业合伙”模式,由赋闲子女代理父母进行电商运营、实地看房或追踪银行高息存款等资产管理分工。 - [34:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=2090s) 许子东指出经济独立是精神独立的前提,但精神独立的关键在于将对物欲与财富的要求维持在合理底线(无欲则刚)。 - [41:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=2485s) 文学中青年对父亲的情感从反抗走向同情,理解并尊敬“可怜的父亲”是年轻人心智走向成熟与建立正面世界观的重要标志。 - [51:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=3085s) 亲子权力失衡易引发以爱为名的控制欲,父母在缺乏自身精神寄托时,常借由经济供给与长篇说教将子女变为精神附庸。 - [53:31](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=3211s) 育儿是一面照出自身缺陷的镜子,父母需要警惕在失控瞬间潜意识复制上一代的暴躁模式,并通过消除“牺牲感”叙事来阻断代际创伤。 - [01:00:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=3643s) 面对年迈父母苛刻的情感索取,子女可运用内在小孩(PAC理论)视角将其视作“求助的幼童”,从而化解防御对抗与情绪消耗。 - [01:05:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=3912s) 借由赵州禅师公案与《六祖坛经》“不见世间过”的智慧,将家庭生活中的挑刺与摩擦降维视为检验自我修养进阶的实战考场。 - [01:09:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=4197s) 个体的性格缺陷在特定场景下可转化为独特优势,如内向孤僻逼迫人发展出极敏锐的微表情观察力与共情力。 - [01:16:38](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=4598s) 社会不应过度神化孤立的“纯粹独立”,人生本质上在现实中彼此托举依附,但必须在精神深处清醒接纳个体终将面对孤独。

## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=4s) “全职儿女”与理直气壮的“啃老”

节目在一阵轻松的闲聊中开场,窦文涛打趣嘉宾幼婷在芬兰的生活,并引出她提出的一个关键概念:账要算清楚,家务与做母亲本身也是一份工作,理应成为收入来源。窦文涛随即抛出一个现实中极具争议的镜像话题——那如果“全职做儿女”呢?针对国内网络热议的“啃老”现象,窦文涛提出如今不应带有偏见去审视任何一种生活方式,现实中确实存在一种能够“理直气壮”在家的年轻人。

窦文涛举了一个真实的典型案例:如今就业环境严峻,许多年轻人因找不到合适工作选择回到家中。一位年轻女孩的父母两人退休金加起来近一万元,虽然老两口身体硬朗、喜欢出门找点事做,但对现代科技一窍不通,既不会用智能手机办理业务,也不懂缴费或缴纳社保,更不擅长下厨做饭。女儿留在家里,把生活料理得井井有条,从买保险、带父母体检、规划出游,到每天做出一桌可口的饭菜。父母则把自己的收入交给女儿打理,全家人各取所需、其乐融融。

两年前豆瓣上曾有一个极具代表性的热门讨论板块——“全职儿女互助中心”。面对外界关于“啃老”的质疑与轻视,许多年轻人据理力争:“难道我的付出就不值这份报酬吗?”在很多家庭内部,父母乐得孩子陪伴身旁,省去了孤独,唯一的唠叨可能也就是催促找对象和结婚。这种依靠家庭内部互助而达成平衡的状态,在当下社会正变得愈发普遍。

- 现象案例:年轻女孩父母退休金合计近万元,但不通科技、不善下厨,女儿全职在家打理医保、理财与三餐。 - 社群讨论:豆瓣“全职儿女互助中心”曾引发全网热议,年轻人将陪伴与家务视为应得报酬的劳动。

[03:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=194s) 家庭内循环与“雇保姆”的本质差异

嘉宾们进一步借用经济学概念,将这种模式戏称为“家庭内循环”。如同国家经济的内部大循环一样,家庭成员外出赚钱,再把资金消费在家庭内部;父母购买子女的劳动和服务,子女打理家务并支配开支,钱没有流向外人。然而马未都一针见血地指出,“全职儿女”和“雇佣保姆”存在着不可逾越的鸿沟。

马未都分析,雇佣保姆如果不满意可以训斥,甚至可以随时解雇换人;但对亲生儿女,“你不敢骂她”,即便女儿饭做得很难吃,一旦挑剔,儿女反而会回呛“嫌难吃你自己做”,做父母的不仅无法换人,更不可能真的断供生活费。窦文涛追问,既然出资的父母掌控着经济大权,难道说话不能硬气一点?马未都解释道,雇佣关系里绝不能掺杂感情,而家庭关系里偏偏充满了“爱”:

> “你跟孩子是有爱的,你没法提要求,你当然也没法替换。”

马未都提到香港将养育儿女形容为“无本生意”,做父母的无论和子女发生多大争执,两天后依然会心软带孩子去过生日。爱让父母天然处于无法严厉问责的被动地位,金钱也无法彻底转化为绝对的支配权。

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 雇佣保姆与全职儿女的代际关系对比 accDescr: 对比雇佣保姆的纯契约关系与全职儿女中包含爱的伦理依附关系

subgraph Helper["雇佣保姆模式(纯契约)"] H1["经济购买服务"] --> H2["可考核、可训斥"] H2 --> H3["不满意可解雇替换"] H3 --> H4["无情感纠葛"] end

subgraph Child["全职儿女模式(家庭内循环)"] C1["家庭内部资金供给"] --> C2["劳动服务与陪伴"] C2 --> C3["父母无法严苛要求/不敢训斥"] C3 --> C4["无法替代与无限托底"] C4 --> C5["核心纽带:情感与亲情之爱"] end ```

[05:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=356s) 从美剧《都市女孩》看全球年轻人的困境

窦文涛指出,年轻人无法独立、依靠家庭资助绝非单一地区的个案,而是一个全球性议题。许多留学生或大学毕业生在毕业后依然依附家庭生活,并非他们不愿独立,而是整个大环境让他们难以寻觅立足之地。

窦文涛以经典美剧《都市女孩》(*Girls*)为例展开剖析。剧中的女主角令许多观众既产生强烈共鸣又感到难以喜爱,因为她撕开了当代青年的残酷现实:大学毕业已经两年,她依然在纽约过着漂泊的生活,全靠当普通教师的父母寄钱支付高昂的房租和电话账单。当父母终于难以承受、下定决心要求她自立并停止断供时,女主角却理直气壮地辩解称,身边所有的朋友都在接受父母的补贴。她甚至用极端案例反向要挟父母——自己认识的一个女孩就是因为父母断供,最终堕胎、染上毒瘾,从而逼迫父母继续为自己的生活买单。

- 全球共性:青年失业与生活成本高企导致代际资助常态化,许多年轻人毕业数年依然无法切断家庭脐带。 - 文化镜像:美剧《Girls》直击年轻一代在独立与依附之间的道德撕裂与生存恐慌。

[06:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=416s) 芬兰高福利模式:把依附转向政府而非父母

旅居芬兰的幼婷分享了北欧截然不同的代际图景。在芬兰,人与人之间的关系被高度的制度独立所重塑。孩子从小被灌输彻底独立的意识,失业后绝不会向父母伸手要钱,而是直接求助于社会福利部门。政府不仅会了解其职业意愿、安排技能培训,还会发放失业与住房补贴,确保年轻人能在外独立租房维系基本温饱,而非搬回原生家庭“啃老”。

同样,父母年老体衰时,也绝不会指望把子女绑在身边照料,而是向政府申请养老福利与护理支持。社工部门会定期派遣专业护士上门发药、打针、陪同散步,甚至照料起居。幼婷指出,这种高度依赖国家机制的生活方式,让代际关系脱离了金钱与抚养责任的捆绑:

> “他们跟我讲,这个叫 pure love,就是这是真爱。我们之间没有金钱利益。”

正因为日常没有赡养与经济的交换,两代人成年后若依然愿意聚在一起,往往纯粹是出于彼此喜爱与情感吸引。幼婷举例,自己一位芬兰朋友需出差四天,请住在芬兰中部的父母帮忙看顾孩子两天;两天一过,父母便按原定计划前往自己的夏季木屋(summer cabin)度假,剩下的两天让朋友自己雇保姆解决。窦文涛则补充指出,北欧这种地广人稀、高税收高福利的制度很难在全球普遍复制,且家庭纽带的疏离也伴随着高抑郁率、高自杀率等复杂的社会代价。

- 青年保障:芬兰年轻人失业直接向社会福利机构申领救济与租房补贴,由政府主导职业培训而非向父母索取生活费。 - 养老机制:老年人依靠国家养老金与社区上门医疗护理服务生活,不依赖子女床前尽孝。 - 亲情边界:代际互动摆脱经济依附,但也导致家庭凝聚力相对松散,父母更注重个人生活空间(如夏季木屋度假)。

[10:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=603s) 中西方养老体制差异与“靠政府”还是“靠家庭”

嘉宾们探讨了不同文化和制度背景下养老与救济模式的根本区别。在北欧等福利国家,人们遇到困难第一反应是找政府,几乎不习惯向家人或朋友求助。但在中国,国情和庞大的人口基数决定了这一模式无法照搬。目前中国大约 90% 的老人依然选择居家养老,这是深植于历史、文化和现实国情之中的选择。正如席间所言:“你说全世界都由政府管、政府出钱,但我跟你讲,这是做不到的,这是深植在文化、历史和国情里的。”无论外界如何描绘福利社会的图景,在未来相当长一段时间内,绝大多数中国老人依靠家庭居家的格局不会发生根本逆转。

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 救济与养老模式对比 accDescr: 对比芬兰高福利模式、中国居家养老传统与香港综援制度。

subgraph Nordic["北欧福利模式(如芬兰)"] N1["遇困求助政府"] --> N2["高额救济金保障体面"] end

subgraph China["中国传统与国情"] C1["90% 老人居家养老"] --> C2["依赖家庭纽带与代际支持"] end

subgraph HK["香港综援模式"] H1["经济/住房空间极度紧张"] --> H2["综援兜底但生活质量有限"] end ```

谈及香港,大家指出香港在社会救济上也存在类似芬兰的一面:如果实在没有收入,政府会发放综援提供兜底援助。然而香港的财政与居住空间极度局促,救济金虽然能维持基本温饱,却远无法像芬兰那样达到折合近万元人民币的优渥程度。甚至在一些贫困家庭中,有人算过一笔账:全家四口人集体申领政府援助金,到手的钱竟然比辛辛苦苦外出打工还要划算。

[11:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=678s) 全球青年的困境:2.67亿年轻人不上班与阶层停滞

窦文涛指出,当今世界正经历“数千年未有之大变局”,整个西方乃至全球年轻一代的处境都在发生剧变。根据国际劳工组织(ILO)发布的《全球青年就业趋势》报告,在全球 13 亿青年人口中,竟然有多达 2.67 亿人既不工作也不在学,只能完全依赖父母的资助和照料生活。

这种困局不仅限于发展中国家。一项针对美国“Z世代”(1995至2010年出生)的调查显示,65% 的 Z 世代以及 74% 的 00 后明确认为,自己的财务状况和积累速度已经远远落后于父母同龄时期的水平。过往老一辈人总习惯指责年轻一代是“吃不了苦、偷懒”,但许多在深圳等一线城市打拼的年轻人反驳道,老一辈不过是充分享受到了时代和经济腾飞的红利。今天的年轻人工作时长更长、干得更卖力,到手的薪水却微薄得多。根据北京大学“中国家庭追踪调查”(CFPS)的数据显示,中国适龄劳动力中依赖父母的比例,从 2010 年的不足 2% 一路暴增至 2018 年的超过 40%。这一数字让在座嘉宾大为震惊,也引发了大家对“啃老”定义的深入讨论。

- 全球 13 亿青年中,有 2.67 亿人处于失业且依靠父母供养的状态。 - 美国 65% 的 Z 世代(1995-2010年出生)和 74% 的 00 后认为自身财务积累远落后于父辈。 - 北京大学 CFPS 数据显示,中国依靠父母资助的适龄劳动力占比从 2010 年的不足 2% 飙升至 2018 年的 40% 以上。

[13:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=807s) 房产红利终结:为什么年轻人拼尽全力也超不过父辈?

窦文涛向许子东和马家辉抛出提问:“子东老师,你现在给女儿钱吗?家辉,你给女儿钱吗?”马家辉坦言自己目前不给女儿钱,但他十分感慨地引用了一句电影台词:“你应该珍惜我们还问你要钱的时候。”回想老一辈年轻的时候,父母能咬牙供孩子读完大学就已竭尽全力,刚一毕业就反哺家庭才是常态,绝无可能向家里伸手要钱。

针对两代人财富差距的本质,席间展开了锐利剖析:“对于当今绝大多数中国家庭而言,财富的本质就是房产。”上一代人(如今四五十岁及以上的人群)恰好赶上了住房制度改革和商品房爆发的黄金红利期,用较低的成本置办了房产。而如今三十岁以下的年轻人,单凭自己的工资收入,几乎毫无可能独立负担一套房子。当房产成为衡量家庭资产的决定性载体时,年轻人无论自身能力多么出众、工资多高,在资产总量上都注定无法超越父辈。

许子东分享了一位在欧洲名校担任高层管理职务的华人学者的见解。当被问及欧洲年轻人究竟是从什么时候开始感到“明天不会更美好”时,对方答道是在 1990 年代之后。欧洲年轻人从那时起猛然意识到,自己这辈子再也无法过上父母那样的生活了。他们的父辈不过是普通的大学毕业专业人士,既不是富豪也不是商人,但到了五六十岁自然而然就能在市中心和郊区各拥有一套房子;而现在的年轻人干到退休,不仅在城市里难求一砖一瓦,更没有多余的资产能够留给下一代。

[15:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=943s) “全职儿女”与父母的退场:是提供选择,还是切断翅膀?

面对“如果未来孩子无法超越自己,甚至只想漂泊、深造或在家休整”的假设,嘉宾们探讨了为人父母的底线与边界。针对窦文涛提出的“你和铁人(Iron Man)条件很好,如果孩子长大了只想过平淡生活、想要追求理想漂泊到 30 岁,你管不管”,嘉宾回应道,现在的努力并不是为了必须给孩子留下一栋房子,而是为了“给他选择的机会”。如果孩子提出想出国读书或去外面的世界闯荡漂泊,只要不是单纯瘫在家里无所事事,父母愿意在经济上给予托底;但在托底之余,绝不能演变成无条件的彻底依赖。

嘉宾谈到了自己生下孩子后专门学习心理学的体会。为人父母最艰难的一课,在于克制深沉的爱意、学会得体的“退出”:“因为给予了这么多的爱,你有没有想过,总有一天你必须放手,而且最好是他们连头都不回地展翅高飞。”健康的家庭关系不应利用眼泪、自怨自艾或情感绑架让孩子背负内疚感,父母自身必须保持独立,与成年子女建立边界清晰、精神平等的连接,而不是用所谓“孝道”将孩子拴在身边当“全职儿女”。

嘉宾还以自身经历举例:自己在家里一直住到 27 岁才前往香港独立生活。在传统东亚文化中,未婚子女 27 岁住家里被视作寻常,但到了香港和海外,外界对此感到极其不可思议,认为“27 岁不是 12 岁,鸟儿不飞出巢穴,就永远不知道外面的世界有多残酷,也永远测量不出自己的真正力量”。现在的许多“全职儿女”往往是在社会上遭遇挫折后选择退缩回家——外面没有展现自我的舞台,只有低薪、挨骂和“996”的无休止内卷。而在家庭温暖舒适的庇护所里,虽然看似各取所需,孩子却在日复一日的安逸中退化了应对风险与挫折的本能。社会的转型让当下步入了一个充满不确定性的“风险社会”,逃回家庭并不能真正解决年轻人安身立命的问题。

- 父母努力的终极意义是为子女争取“选择的权利”,而非替代子女去面对人生竞争。 - 真正成功的家庭教育,是父母能够克制情感依赖,接纳子女“不回头”的独立远行。 - 年轻人长期滞留家庭舒适圈,容易丧失面对挫折的韧性与自我生存的能力,难以应对现代“风险社会”的冲击。

[20:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=1209s) 职场动荡与“全职儿女”的心理代价

过去年轻人的职业路径相对稳定可预期,入行后大致能看清每个阶段的薪资水平与发展空间;然而当下环境风云变幻,每隔三四年就可能遭遇一场行业风暴或经济低迷。年轻人身处激烈的竞争中,工作几年后心理扭曲的概率极高,不仅面临看心理医生、做心理咨询的困扰,身体也承受着巨大的负荷与折磨。在这样的社会现实下,如果父母有足够的能力去分担或缓解孩子的辛苦,本质上无可厚非,因为当下确实没有多少理想的出路。

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 经济依赖与家庭心理控制循环 accDescr: 展示年轻人因职场压力退回家庭,但在接受父母资助后陷入心理规训的循环过程。

subgraph 职场困境 A["职场风暴与经济不确定性"] --> B["身心俱疲 / 无法找到理想工作"] end

subgraph 家庭退缩 B --> C["退回家中当“全职儿女”"] C --> D["接受父母资助 / 补贴房贷"] end

subgraph 心理代价 D --> E["家庭边界消失与高压说教"] E --> F["愧疚自责却无法独立"] F --> C end ```

有些报道描绘出一幅当代荒诞而凄凉的画面:一个孤独的年轻人在家中形同置身北欧旷野般荒芜,退回家庭做起了“全职儿女”。这背后的核心根源是找不到理想的工作,退回家庭往往是无奈之举。不少年轻人自我解嘲道:既然在外注定要被不靠谱的老板PUA,还不如回家被父母PUA。然而,拿父母的钱从来都不是免费的午餐,它深刻触动了人性的边界。当你 경제적으로 独立时,父母对待你尚且保持一定的客气与界限;一旦伸手拿了父母的钱、让他们全额补贴甚至供房贷,父母施加的控制与规训强度便完全变了味。

- 许多年轻人一边发誓“下个月绝不再拿父母一分钱”,一边到了下个月又不得不低头伸手,内心充满强烈的愧疚与煎熬。 - 父母给钱的同时往往伴随着无休止的唠叨与催促:“怎么还不找对象?”“这么大岁数了,不给我们留个孙子孙女吗?”“成天游手好闲在想什么?” - 面对“一边拿钱一边被天天训斥”的死循环,主持人和嘉宾感叹当下年轻一代在现实与精神夹缝中生存的艰难。

> “一旦你拿了父母的钱,或者父母供养你、供你买房,他们对待你的方式——那种强度——就完全不同了。”

---

[22:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=1365s) 人生的两种货币:时间与金钱的博弈

父母给孩子在外面付首付、还房贷,与孩子躲在家里逃避社会的挑战是截然不同的两件事。资助买房是帮助孩子走向独立、积累资产,其权益与目标是清晰明确的;而躲在父母的羽翼下“啃老”度日,则是在回避现实的磨砺。归根结底,人的一生是由两种核心货币构成的:一种是金钱,另一种则是时间。

许多人回望青春与中年阶段,最大的遗憾往往是看到地铁和街头上匆匆奔波的众生,仅仅是在为了微薄的生活开销而贱卖自己的时间。如果做一份工作毫无兴趣和意义,纯粹为了维持生计而沦为“用时间换取金钱”的工具,在经济条件允许的情况下确实应当尽量避免。然而这里存在一个巨大的悖论:工作的所谓“意义”和个人的“志趣”,往往不是单凭闭门冥想就能找到的,它必须在具体的经历与痛苦磨炼中才能浮现。

> “在哲学层面来说,如果你做的事情既无兴趣也无意义,纯粹只是为了蝇头小利,那就是在拿时间换金钱——能避免就尽量避免。”

---

[24:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=1467s) 走出去才能“解锁”人生经验

如果一个人辞职后呆在家里闭关两年,天天推演自己的兴趣所在与能力边界,往往寸步难行。真正长期在职场摸爬滚打的人都深知,人生的第一步会如何牵引出第二步、第三步,事前根本无法预设。即使第一份工作枯燥乏味、薪资微薄甚至充满剥削,身处其中你依然能发现自己的长处、积累技能,并在人际碰撞中捕捉到新的机遇。

曾有嘉宾分享亲身经历:自己曾做过一份极其枯燥的工作,整整忍受了十个月;就在第十一个月的第一天,突然遇到了一位合伙人,两人相谈甚欢并共同开发新项目,命运就此柳暗花明。甚至像在电影院撕十个月门票这种看似毫无意义的机械劳动,也能让人在观察世相中学会写短篇小说。生命是一个持续积累的过程。有嘉宾回忆自己27岁前往香港发展的那段时光,当时深感那是人生的最低谷;但如今反思,若没有当年的挫折与碰撞,人生就失去了波澜起伏的故事性。人生就像电子游戏打怪升级,在游戏里角色阵亡了,第二天重新启动依然能满血复活。

- 游戏中最核心的机制是“解锁”新的能力、装备或成就;单靠坐在家里,新的潜能永远不可能凭空被激发出来。 - 只有走出家门、去和外部世界碰撞,哪怕处于看似最狼狈的低谷期,个体深层的某些潜能才会被真正激活。

> “你必须去经历那些低谷,就像玩游戏通关一样;在游戏里即便阵亡了,第二天重新开机,你依然满血复活。”

---

[28:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=1687s) “寄生单身”与家庭新型合伙模式

探讨“全职儿女”现象时,不应忽视群体内部的巨大落差:社会上存在大量想当“全职儿女”却没有资格的年轻人,因为他们的父母根本没有财力支持他们脱产回家。在同龄人之间,这种落差容易引发矛盾与嫉妒,有人将社交网络上抱怨“全职儿女生活不易”的声音视为一种隐秘的“凡尔赛”(炫耀)。但从宏观层面看,这种现象的出现也印证了社会总体财富的增长——如今衣食无忧、家里“多添一双筷子”就能维持生存的家庭比例,远高于过去的时代。

这一现象在日本早已出现,被称为“寄生单身”(Parasite Singles),指的是那些不婚、与父母同住、主要生活成本由父母兜底,自己仅做零工赚取零花钱并与父母终身共生的人群。如今部分中国父母也持这种心态,认为退休金足够保障温饱,不忍心看孩子在外受苦,从而默许了这种共生关系。然而,“全职儿女”并非只有做“家务保姆”这一种单向依赖的形式,在互联网时代,不少家庭演变出了新型的协作模式:

| 模式类型 | 父母的角色与资源 | 儿女的角色与分工 | 典型运作场景 | |:--- |:--- |:--- |:--- | | **家庭电商合伙** | 提供启动资金、不擅长平台运营 | 懂平台规则、负责网店打理与选品 | 共同批发小商品开网店运营 | | **资产与市场调研** | 掌握积蓄资本、缺乏闲暇时间 | 拥有充足时间与精力跑市场 | 代替父母实地看房(香港房市调研) | | **银行理财追踪** | 拥有大额存款资金 | 紧跟各银行每日波动的定存利率 | 在房市低迷期协助寻找高息定存组合 |

在生活压力巨大的香港,一些家庭已经探索出这种把儿女当成“商业合伙人”的生活方式。例如父母出资支持孩子开小网店,或者由赋闲在家的年轻人帮忙看盘、研究股票。前些年很多香港父母让孩子替自己天天去跑盘看房;而在近两年香港房地产市场走弱的背景下,家庭投资转向银行定期存款。由于各家银行的短期定存利率每日变动,父母便让赋闲在家的年轻人充当金融信息监测员,每天比对不同银行的定存利率进行资产配置,把家庭共处转化为一种互利的协同合作。

> “很多父母会说:‘我不希望孩子到外面去受苦;如果你想去工作就去,如果你留在家里也没关系,我的退休金足够养活你。’”

[31:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=1892s) 香港高息存款的“搬砖”游戏与乌龙惊魂

嘉宾们聊起了近期各家银行为了抢存款而展开的利率战。一位嘉宾分享了自己乐此不疲的“搬砖”日常:每天让助手盯盘,如果 A 银行两个月定存利率从 3.6% 涨到 3.7%,就立刻把资金搬过去;明天若另一家银行给到 3.8%,就继续转移。这种通过在各家银行频繁开户、挪动资金来薅羊毛的操作,让他觉得既有趣又有成就感。

紧接着,另一位嘉宾也分享了自己在香港理财时的惊险故事。一位银行理财经理曾建议他把港币换成英镑,称那两个月的短期利率明显高出一截。他试着存了一笔,尝到高息甜头后甚至幻想起从此不用工作、靠吃利息实现财务自由。于是他大胆地把大笔资金投了进去。然而,因为平时忙于工作,他很快把这笔理财忘得一干二净。直到某天打开网银,赫然发现自己的储蓄账户里只剩下了几块钱。

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: 香港银行短期高息揽储机制与搬砖流程 accDescr: 展示银行如何用短期高利率吸引储户将资金在活期与各定期产品间挪动

subgraph 储户操作 A["活期储蓄账户"] -->|"买入高息产品"| B["短期定存账户 / 外币理财"] B -->|"到期后未续存/未转出"| C["利率断崖下跌或躺在独立账户"] end

subgraph 银行策略 D["1-3个月超高年化利率 (3.8% - 3.9%)"] -->|"吸引外部资金流入"| B end ```

那一瞬间,他整个人脑子一片空白,眼前发黑,以为自己辛苦积攒的养老钱遭遇了电信诈骗或者金融圈套,甚至慌张到不知该如何向银行客服解释。直到最后查明真相,才发现原来那笔钱只是在到期后静静躺在另一个独立的定期账户里,并未丢失。这番虚惊一场让他感叹自己完全是个金融小白,并揭示了银行的营销策略:银行用头两三个月的高息吸引储户把钱转过来,但期限一过利率就会大幅跳水,储户如果不够精明、忘记按时转出,就会失去优势。而另一边,频繁填表转移资金的嘉宾则坦言,银行过去长期享受极低存款利率,现在好不容易利率涨到 3.8% 或 3.9%,自己哪怕天天填表搬钱也感到格外解气和满足。

[34:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=2090s) 芬兰社会的住房混居与“精神独立”大辩论

话题随后转向北欧:在以高福利著称的芬兰,父母与子女之间的经济依赖关系又是如何?周轶君指出,芬兰年轻人原本极为独立,但近一两年由于全球经济不景气,连芬兰新闻也开始频繁报道“芬兰年轻人需要父母资助才能买得起房”,这一罕见现象甚至成为公共话题,说明啃老正在变成一种全球性的普遍现实。

谈到芬兰的社会福利与住房规划,周轶君分享了当地打破阶层固化的独特经验: - 政府公租房不能随意买卖或入住,许多社区会专门划出特定楼宇定向租售给特定群体(如必须持有音乐学院文凭或演出资质的艺术家)。 - 即便是在黄金地段的优质楼盘中,开发商也会强制预留部分楼层以非市场化的平价配租给低收入群体,实现真正的“贫富混居”。 - 从俯瞰视角来看,富人住宅与保障性住房混杂在一起,外人根本无法分辨哪栋楼住着穷人。这种规划旨在让不同阶层建立社区认同,让资源丰富的家庭带动周围的孩子在同一所学校共同成长。

由此,窦文涛向许子东抛出了一个深刻的议题:“经济独立是精神独立的前提吗?不经济独立能不能精神独立?”许子东明确给出了自己的判断:“一般认为没有经济独立,你就不能精神独立。”但他随后也探讨了标准的相对性:社会的门槛往往被定得太高(如必须买房或达到特定收入),而在芬兰,即便初为人母者每月能领取约 600 欧元(约合五六千港币)的育儿津贴,但这笔钱也仅够维持最基本的开销,并不会随着孩子数量线性翻倍变成发家致富的手段。

> “一般认为没有经济独立,你就不能精神独立。” —— 许子东

[38:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=2291s) 两代人的财富积累:“家庭共享”与新型分工

面对当前经济环境下的啃老现象,嘉宾们从历史纵深的角度提出了不同维度的观察。过去的父母在孩子读大学时一个月只能挤出 50 块钱生活费,甚至不够吃饱饭;而经历了数十年经济快速发展的当代父母,手中大都积累了一定的资产与财富,客观上具备了帮衬子女的经济基础。

现场分享了一个典型的中国中产母亲的硬核规划案例: - 丈夫每月收入数万元,妻子每月雷打不动拿出数千元为孩子配置各类商业保险与养老信托。 - 丈夫计划投资房产时,妻子坚决要求只写孩子的名字,以规避未来的遗产税风险。 - 妻子甚至“逼迫”丈夫立下遗嘱,明确资产不得留给公婆,必须全额定向传承给子女;仅在公婆未来陷入生活极度困难时,才允许孩子酌情资助。

这种严密而甚至带有几分黑色幽默的资产布局,让嘉宾们意识到,如果孩子不盲目挥霍,依靠父母精心构筑的财务安全网,即便不外出拼命工作似乎也能过完一生。但窦文涛反问:“可以是可以,但是他不快乐是吧?”

最后,针对两代人之间的经济流动,嘉宾们聊到了“家庭财富共享”的新形态。子女在外部职场面临巨大的就业压力与生存困境,不得不退守家庭寻求父母的经济后盾,但这并不等同于消极的寄生。一位嘉宾提到身边的生动范例:有朋友的孩子主要依靠家里生活,但他主动承担起了极具价值的家庭分工——全权负责全家每年的旅行规划。每年两到三次的高难度长途旅行中,孩子从敲定小众路线、预订机票酒店到全程落地执行一手包办,让父母享受到省心惬意的天伦之乐,完成了另一种维度的代际情感与劳务反哺。

[41:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=2485s) 两代人的互利共处与文学中的“可怜父亲”

窦文涛和嘉宾们探讨了年轻人住在家里的另一种可能性:子女并不只是单向地消耗父母的资源,而是能够反哺家庭生活。比如在工作繁忙之余,孩子们负责规划周末的餐饮与出行路线,带父母去尝试没吃过的餐厅,丰富了父母因缺乏时间或资讯而相对单调的生活。正如席间嘉宾总结的:

> “每一家有每一家的情况,关键是这个条件,你能不能把它充分发挥,丰富了两代人的生活。”

然而,许子东敏锐地指出了硬币的另一面:外界讨论啃老往往站在父母的立场——“只要我有钱,为什么不能给孩子花?”但这种资助对年轻一代精神世界的冲击却被忽视了。年轻人如何看待和评价父母,决定了他们对社会最基础的认知与世界观。许子东分析了近几十年中国文学作品中青年主角形象的演变:从早期的对抗、责备,逐渐变成了对父亲的“同情(pity)”。年轻人发现父亲其实很老实、很弱小,在社会上受尽了委屈。

> “很多年以后,多少年过去以后,你发现你自己在重复,走你父亲的路的时候,你才懂得尊敬你可怜的父亲。”

许子东认为,懂得“尊敬自己可怜的父亲”,才是年轻人形成正面、成熟世界观的标志。若年轻人家中暂住是出于自愿,双方各取所需,便能激发生命力;但如果是因现实受挫而被迫蜷缩在父母羽翼下,伴随着母亲抱怨式的付出,家庭便会沦为怨气与矛盾的温床。

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 两代人共处的两种心态与结果 accDescr: 对比年轻人选择留家与被迫留家的心理机制及最终导致的不同家庭走向

subgraph Positive ["积极的共生关系"] A1["自愿留家 / 缓冲休整"] --> B1["资源互补与反哺 (策划生活/陪伴)"] B1 --> C1["双方各取所需,激发潜在创造力"] end

subgraph Negative ["消极的依附关系"] A2["被动无奈 / 逃避现实"] --> B2["经济依赖伴随付出方怨气"] B2 --> C2["产生家庭内耗,演变为新型冲突"] end ```

---

[44:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=2697s) 边界感、精神独立与“无欲则刚”的经济底线

女嘉宾分享了切身的生活体会:搬出家后,自己与母亲的关系反而改善了许多。同住时距离过近,母亲连她几点回家、穿什么衣服都要事无巨细地过问;哪怕是晚上11点59分进门,母亲也会掐着表质问“不是说好12点前回来吗”。拉开物理距离后,母女关系回归“君子之交淡如水”,彼此相处反而更加舒适。中国式亲子关系中这种充满阻力与焦虑的温情,本质上源于父母对子女在外受苦的过度担忧。

围绕“经济独立是否是精神独立的前提”,席间展开了深入辩论。女嘉宾提出,自己学习心理学正是希望孩子能先具备精神独立性,唯有精神独立的孩子,才能在遭遇挫折时暂避港湾却不沉沦,蓄满能量后再次出发。但许子东与窦文涛指出,精神独立必须有物质现实作托底:

> “精神独立非常重要,但是精神独立要建立在一个基础上面:就是你对经济的要求不能太高。”

许子东援引了阿城小说《棋王》中王一生的生活哲学——人是为了下棋活着,还是为了吃饭活着?答案是既要活着,但对“活着”的要求不能太奢靡。窦文涛随即回忆起多年前与阿城同桌吃饭时的教诲:

> “阿城当年跟我吃饭讲的一句话,我到今天都很受用,我说想挣钱怎么怎么样,他说:‘反正你挣的钱越多,你为他牺牲的自由就越多,这个账你自己去算。’”

大家一致赞同这正是“无欲则刚”的道理。无法做到完全无欲,但绝不能让欲望膨胀到反噬自主性的程度。

---

[48:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=2903s) 多元价值观与父母的自我解绑

当一个人精神独立时,其价值观自然走向多元化,不再以金钱作为衡量人生价值的唯一尺度。女嘉宾强调,面对孩子的成长,做父母的绝不应将“养儿防老”变成扣在孩子头上的紧箍咒:

> “所以没有养儿防老,没有——其实我唯一希望给你的,就是你能够知道你自己要做什么、你是谁,你的优点在哪里,然后去选一个你要的。”

她直言,父母若想培养独立的孩子,自身首先要从依赖孩子的心理中解脱出来,成为精神独立的个体。现场嘉宾幽默地打趣,父母得先看心理医生、先自救,甚至调侃道“要找钢铁侠去解决财务依赖”。

许子东反向推导了这一逻辑:多元价值观与精神独立其实互为因果。如果一个人的价值谱系极其单一,整天只想着满足物质欲望、追求财富增长,那就注定会被经济利益驱使着四处受制;相反,无论是做一名纯粹的艺术家,还是做一个热爱美食的普通人,只要在自己的生活圆圈里确立了认同的核心价值,就能摆脱精神奴役。

最后,窦文涛抛出了一个萦绕在心头的现实困惑:环顾身边像许子东、游婷这样有学识、有反思能力的知识分子父母,无不对儿女怀揣着理解甚至“愧疚”之情;然而打开网络,扑面而来的却是海量年轻人在血泪控诉窒息的原生家庭。这种现实圈子与网络舆论的剧烈撕裂,引发了大家更深层的思索。

[51:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=3085s) 亲子关系的控制欲与经济附属

圆桌席间谈及当下许多年轻人与父母之间的紧张关系,甚至形容有时彼此就像“仇人”一样,充满了困惑与怨怼。嘉宾以张爱玲和她母亲的关系为例,指出两人连每一分钱都要算得清清楚楚。很多母亲口口声声说是为了“保护女儿”,骨子里可能只是为了满足自己无处安放的精神世界与控制欲。当代不少父母的生活过于空虚匮乏,只能紧紧抓住孩子不放;他们一边看着孩子,一边抱怨连连,心里却想着:“你没得选,你必须靠我们,对吧?钱是我们给你的。”

在这种权力不对等的结构下,父母资助孩子的同时,往往将子女视作儿时必须表演节目的工具,随时拿来当作谈资,而孩子只能默默忍受。许多年轻人怀揣着隐忍的心态:“等我自己赚到钱,我就断绝关系、不理他们,再也不用听这些话了。”但只要没有经济独立,就没有反抗的底气。最令人刺痛的是,父母每月通过微信转账发生活费时,总要附带一篇长篇大论的说教,字字诛心。嘉宾深感痛心:“难道父母不应该爱孩子吗?怎么就演变成了一种精神折磨?”父母的精神独立性缺乏多样性,习惯用自己单一且自认为绝对正确的标准去量裁下一代,直接导致了孩子的怨恨,并投射到孩子看待社会的视角中。更为残酷的现实在于,很多三十岁依然向父母伸手的年轻人,在忍受指责与数落的同时,内心却不得不悲凉地承认父母说得没错:“我确实没混出来,你甚至无法反驳他们是对的。”

[53:31](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=3211s) 育儿是照见自身缺陷的镜子与潜意识复制

谈到育儿的真实体验,嘉宾直言,外界常讨论带孩子身体有多累、睡眠有多匮乏,但为人父母最可怕之处在于:它会逼你在毫无防备的时刻直面自己最大的性格缺陷——那些你原本不想承认、或者明明知道却懒得去改的毛病。

嘉宾分享了自己的亲身经历:每当对孩子失去耐心时,丈夫总会在一旁提醒:“看,你现在的样子简直跟你妈一模一样。”这句话就像点燃了引线,瞬间让她原地爆炸。虽然明知自己急躁的性格源自母亲的遗传与潜移默化,但在孩子哭闹、所有哄逗手段全部失效的崩溃瞬间,体内的“爬行动物脑”便会彻底接管身体,最不想展现的暴躁本能不由自主地倾泻而出。那一刻,她深刻意识到这是上一代烙印在自己身上的印记。席间嘉宾打趣说,这种情况不该去学心理学,而应该去念《心经》。

为了打破这种代际控制与占有欲,嘉宾在日常生活中刻意重塑语言习惯: - 严格克制自己不说“我的孩子”,而是称呼他的名字或借用丈夫的称呼叫“钢铁侠兄弟”,从语言源头上抹去所有权的概念,避免潜意识被“所有物”思维侵蚀。 - 面对自己离开职场七年做全职妈妈的决定,她严厉告诫自己绝不能冠以“牺牲”之名,而必须看作自己的主动选择,每天反问自己是否开心,决不能把怨气撒在孩子身上,说出“要不是生了你我就不会辞职”这类话。

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 代际行为模式的潜意识复制与觉察机制 accDescr: 展示原生家庭的性格模式如何在育儿压力下被激活,以及如何通过语言重塑与自我觉察来进行阻断。

subgraph Origin["原生家庭根源"] M["母亲的急躁模式 / 全职育儿选择"] end

subgraph Trigger["育儿压力触发"] C["孩子哭闹失控 / 应对手段耗尽"] R["爬行动物脑接管:下意识爆发情绪"] end

subgraph Breakthrough["觉察与阻断机制"] L["重塑语言习惯:消除所有权称谓"] A["拒绝'牺牲感'叙事:确认为自主选择"] U["追求无条件的爱:以自我内心愉悦为导向"] end

M --> Trigger C --> R R -.->|"代际创伤重复"| M R ==> Breakthrough ```

随后,嘉宾讲述了一次心理学课程的经历。老师让学员想象人生有12个箱子,在0到18岁之间选一个数字,并回忆那个年纪对各种概念的定义。嘉宾选了6岁,本以为“婚姻”是最安全的分析主题,便写下6岁时对好婚姻的认知:父亲在外打拼,母亲在家里做全职家庭主妇。老师顺势追问:“你当时做了什么决定?”话音未落,嘉宾当场落泪。她曾自负地以为,受过良好教育的自己成为全职妈妈是独立深思熟虑的结果,到头来才发觉自己依然没有逃出母亲人生的既定轨迹。“年轻人看待父母的方式,就是他们看待社会的方式”,随着年龄增长,人往往会不可避免地活成父母的模样。

[59:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=3541s) 追寻无条件的爱与“带薪陪伴”的空虚羁绊

在意识到母爱有时会沉重得让人窒息之后,嘉宾在生活教练的指导下设立了人生目标:这一生一定要体验一次“给出无条件的爱”究竟是何种滋味。她坦言,即便对丈夫甚至对两个孩子,自己的爱也经常带有预设的条件与任务标准,潜意识里总希望孩子符合“好儿子”的定义。

席间另一位嘉宾剖析道,所谓真正无条件的付出,是在做出每一个决定时只叩问自己当下的本心:“你现在做这件事快乐吗?你想做吗?做完之后你感到无比幸福,这就足够了。”

话题由此延伸到海外华人的家庭羁绊。嘉宾分享了最近进行互助咨询的一位朋友的真实故事:该朋友身在美国,而母亲独居在台湾。母亲每天打电话对他说,愿意把自己的退休金全部拿出来养他,只要他开个价回台湾生活。母亲的唯一要求仅仅是有人在身边陪伴,甚至连饭都不需要他做。这种愿望背后,是老龄父母面对晚年孤独时,试图用金钱买断子女生活、维系病态羁绊的极度空虚。

[01:00:43](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=3643s) 把年迈父母视作“求助的孩童”:心理视角的转换

探讨继续聚焦于两代人之间沉重的心理拉扯。有嘉宾提到朋友心中的巨大阴影:朋友总是不解母亲为何如此看不起自己、认定自己无能,甚至在自己在海外拥有极好伴侣时横加打压,只因母亲认定一旦儿子回台湾,伴侣绝不会同行,“为什么她就是不能让我幸福?”这种心结让子女陷入无尽的内耗。然而另一位嘉宾指出,母亲之所以提出这种近乎无理的要求,根源在于她内心的极度痛苦与无助。如果转换视角,不要把她当成居高临下的母亲,而是当成一个向外呼救的孩子——当一个小女孩哭喊着“求求你回来陪陪我”时,那其实是一种痛苦的呼救。

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 视角转换机制 accDescr: 展示将年迈母亲视作求助儿童后的心态变化流程

subgraph 原有冲突模式 ["原有冲突模式"] A["母亲苛求与打压"] --> B["子女感到被轻视与控制"] B --> C["产生对抗、装聋作哑与逃避"] end

subgraph 心理转换模式 ["心理转换模式(内在小孩视角)"] D["母亲发出陪伴诉求"] --> E["视其为无助哭喊的‘小女孩’"] E --> F["唤起成年自我的同理与包容"] F --> G["化解情绪对立,给予有限陪伴"] end ```

嘉宾谈起自身的经历:面对父母微不足道的求助——比如母亲说“好久没喝茶了,没人陪我喝茶”,自己第一反应常常也是烦躁,心想平日工作那么累,好不容易到了星期天只想好好休息。但随后会运用心理学中的投射技巧进行调节。正如心理学上常讲每个人内心都有“父母、成人、儿童”(PAC理论)三种状态,这时不妨把母亲想象成一个无助的小女孩。如果是一个可爱的小女孩向你求援,任何人都会心甘情愿抽出哪怕一两个小时陪伴;面对一个年迈体弱、步履蹒跚、口齿不清的母亲,又怎么忍心对她的呼救充耳不闻呢?

- “当一个小孩说‘你回来,你一定要在我身边’,那个小孩是在哭、在求助,你的角度就不一样了。” - 子女面对父母呼救时的下意识逃避或装聋作哑,往往并非没有爱,而是源于自身精疲力竭与角色预设带来的防御机制。

---

[01:03:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=3782s) “装聋作哑”的防御:五岁儿子的回答与边界的缺失

针对子女为何喜欢“装聋作哑”不予回应,嘉宾分享了一段自己与儿子的真实育儿故事。儿子在五岁时,每次母亲喊他去洗澡,他都置若罔闻地继续玩手里的玩具。母亲感到被冒犯并生气地训诫:“你可以跟我商量说‘妈妈能不能再给我十分钟’,但你不能装没听见,这是不尊重人。”没料到才五岁的孩子道出了极深刻的心理真相:

> “妈妈我听到了,但我如果回答你,我就觉得我必须马上做,我受不了那个压力。”

这个故事精准剖析了亲子互动的结构性困境:父母在日常中往往没有给予孩子自主决定回应与行动节奏的弹性空间。孩子预设一旦应答就必须即刻顺从,否则对方依旧会发火,因此“装聋作哑”成了唯一的防御掩体。而将这种模式平移到成年子女与年迈父母的关系中同样适用。人与人之间天然会试探边界,就像婴儿哭闹能换来关注一样,母亲发现只要自己一哭,子女就会回来陪自己吃饭,这种机制便会一再强化。

成年子女因此陷入极大的恐惧——父母的情感索求宛如一个吞噬一切的无底黑洞。子女热爱自己现有的独立生活,害怕被彻底卷入:“我很爱你,我可以来看你十次,但我受不了一百次。”但这些真心话往往说不出口,因为一旦划清界限,原本和睦温情的表象就会瞬间瓦解,最终两代人都在内心深处郁结出难言的隔阂与委屈。

---

[01:05:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=3912s) 亲子芥蒂、赵州禅意与“若真修道人,不见世间过”

窦文涛将话题引向更深层的人性追问:“这种父母与子女之间的‘怨’,到底算不算正常?”许子东教授分析道,真正普遍且正常的芥蒂往往隐匿在心底不被挑明,双方心照不宣。两代人的认知和行为习惯必然存在巨大分歧,子女看不惯长辈所做的事情是常态,只是大多时候不正面冲突,但这种分歧是否上升到刻骨铭心的“怨”,则因人而异。

许子东随即联想到日本禅学大师铃木大拙(D. T. Suzuki)关于禅宗与精神分析的著作,书中记载了一则关于赵州禅师的公案。一位家庭主妇向赵州禅师倾诉苦水:“丈夫不顾家,儿子不成器,自己每天辛勤操持家务却得不到半点赞许和认可,该怎么办?”赵州禅师的回答极其反直觉:“让他们继续做他们的事,你继续做你的事。”赵州禅师更有一句名言:“我不入地狱,谁入地狱?我若不入,谁在那里救你?”

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: 两种处世境界对比 accDescr: 展示权利边界社会与禅宗修道视角在归因上的差异

subgraph 权利与对错视角 ["权利平等视角(凡俗逻辑)"] A1["遭遇外部矛盾/被欺骗"] --> B1["指责对方越界或品行不端"] B1 --> C1["向外归因:觉得自己总是对的"] end

subgraph 禅宗修持视角 ["六祖坛经视角(修道境界)"] A2["遭遇困境与逆境"] --> B2["自我反躬:为何是我招致此境?"] B2 --> C2["内向转化:视逆境为修行的‘考题’"] end ```

现代文明建立在讲求平等、边界与权利的框架之上,但在这些世俗权利之上,传统哲学提出了一种极高的精神境界。许子东举出身边一位商界巨贾的例子:当听到别人抱怨生活中总遇到小人受骗时,这位大老板反倒反躬自省:“为什么骗子敢来骗我?是不是我自己露出了什么破绽,让他们觉得我可以被欺骗?”他收藏古玩若买到赝品,同样反思自己眼力为何不精、虚荣名声为何让行家以为自己好糊弄。这恰恰暗合了《六祖坛经》中的名言:“若真修道人,不见世间过。”当一个人达到此种境界,便不再向外指责他人,而是将世间一切摩擦与伤害视作自我的功课。

- 许子东阐述赵州禅师思想的核心意涵:在权利本位之上,存在一种不向外指责、主动承担并渡化苦难的至高道德预设。 - “若真修道人,不见世间过”,将一切矛盾归结于自身修为与心性的不足,虽然凡人难以企及,却提供了消解怨怼的极致视角。

---

[01:08:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=4131s) 把家庭摩擦当成“通关考场”:心理学与修行的落地

面对许子东引述的超凡道德标准,现场嘉宾坦言,凡人皆有私欲、执念与脾气,不可能单方面做无底线包容的“观音菩萨”。但真正有价值的心态,是“把修行用在当下”。嘉宾转述了自己先生的一句精辟见解:

> “孩子发脾气的时候,才是展现你家庭教育和个人修养的时候;孩子乖乖听话时,谁都能当个好父母。”

这种视角将家庭生活的冲突降维转化为一场自我验证的考场。当母亲唠叨挑刺、孩子哭闹失控时,与其被情绪牵着走,不如视其为一剂强心针:“我平时读那么多书、做那么多心理咨询、学那么多沟通技巧,不正是为了用在此时此刻吗?”只要这一刻能稳住情绪、抚平当下的波澜,最终母亲开心、自己也有所长进,便算成功“通关”。心理咨询的学费没有白花,修行的功夫也落到了实处。生活中的每一次低谷与人际碰撞,最终都成为了自我磨砺与人格进阶的契机。

- 面对至亲的情绪挑战,最高级的化解不是压抑或牺牲,而是将对方的“刁难”视作个人修养进阶的实战考场。 - 凡人的成长之道,在于把心理学技巧与生活接轨,实现“一次通关,彼此释怀”的情感正循环。

[01:09:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=4197s) 缺陷即是优势:网球教练与微表情洞察

嘉宾分享了一个关于著名网球教练接受采访的故事。那位培养出众多冠军的功勋教练坦言,执教过程本身就是一堂深刻的人生课,并提出一个核心观点:任何选手的短板与缺陷,本质上都可能成为其独特的优势。教练回忆自己幼年时性格极度内向、孤僻,非常害怕人群,总是躲在别人身后,以至于被学校老师视作有特殊心理需求或行为障碍的孩子,频繁追问他为何如此惧怕人际接触。

然而,正是这种“躲在人群之后”的童年经历,逼迫他长期在边缘保持沉默与观察。久而久之,他练就了极敏锐的微表情洞察力。成为教练后,球员无需开口倾诉“今天心情低落”或是“这个击球站位让我缺乏安全感”,教练仅凭赛场上的眼神和微表情便能洞悉一切。窦文涛对此深有共鸣,指出自己童年同样极度缺乏安全感,因而养成了善于“看人脸色”的本能,而正是这种察言观色的习惯,最终促使并成就了他作为主持人的职业敏感度。

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 缺陷向优势转化的心理机制 accDescr: 展示内向恐惧如何通过长期观察转化为敏锐洞察力的过程。

subgraph Defect["童年特质 / 缺陷"] A["极度内向与惧怕人群"] end

subgraph Process["行为代偿"] B["退居边缘保持沉默"] C["长期专注观察周围他人"] end

subgraph Strength["核心竞争力 / 优势"] D["敏锐洞察微表情与心理状态"] E["执教/主持中的深度共情与掌控"] end

A --> B B --> C C --> D D --> E ```

[01:11:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=4287s) 意见即是修行:从阿那亚到北欧铁人

窦文涛联想到阿那亚创始人马寅的经历。马寅曾谈到,作为管理者,起初面对业主铺天盖地的各种意见与负面反馈,心里同样极度抵触和沮丧。但历经时日后,他将阅读业主的批评视作每天必须完成的一门“修行功课”,心态彻底平复,不再为此抓狂。嘉宾们借此打趣对座的朋友,历经七年在寒冷北欧的严苛打磨与自我超越,真正的“铁人”并非家中的丈夫,而是把自己逼成更高素养、更有定力的自己。

席间谈及为了应对家庭与内心的拉扯而去进修心理学,嘉宾道出了深层的动机:“因为人注定是孤独的。”这句突如其来的哲学式总结瞬间引发了全场的唏嘘与感慨。

- 马寅将业主的繁杂意见从“情绪负担”转化为每日必备的“修行作业”。 - 嘉宾感叹北欧严酷环境与生活挑战逼迫人完成内在超越:“能做到这一切的前提,是你把自己变成了一个更好、更有修养的人。”

[01:12:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=4368s) 书店里的提醒:“爱孩子就要善待他们的母亲”

话题转向父母与子女的微妙博弈,有嘉宾分享了自己多年前与女儿在书店的难忘回忆。当时女儿年仅九或十岁,两人在书店挑选图书,父亲询问女儿:“你觉得我应该读什么书?”女儿端详片刻,抽出一本书推到他面前。书封上的英文译为中文赫然写着:“如果你爱孩子,就要善待他们的母亲。”

这句话给当父亲的带来了极大的心理震动与惭愧。在孩子的审视下,父亲自以为尽力的对待方式依然暴露出不足,而孩子却用一种极为深沉而体面的方式完成了对父亲的当头棒喝。现场嘉宾哄堂大笑,打趣道“家里分明出了个暴君”或是“家庭底色太黑暗”。

- 窦文涛借此感慨,高考作文如果真出一道《我的父亲母亲》,“天下不知道要冒出多少千古奇文”。 - 嘉宾更感叹为人父母的隐秘恐惧:“天不怕地不怕,就怕孩子冷不防问一句‘这是从哪来的’,或者家里出了个作家。”

[01:15:07](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=4507s) 家里有作家的恐惧:悄悄打包的行李箱

嘉宾进一步分享了不敢阅读女儿小说的苦衷。女儿发表第一篇处女作时,他满心欢喜地打开英文原文,开篇第一句便写道:“在一个寒冷的冬夜,我的父亲悄悄收拾起行李……”这一句惊悚的开场让他冷汗直冒,深感在最没有防备的时刻被孩子以文字重构,此后再也不敢翻阅女儿的作品。不仅如此,嘉宾的妻子同样是畅销书作家,拥有无数文艺青年拥趸,而他至今不敢翻看妻子的散文集,原因是某次翻开目录,赫然看到一篇文章名为《我的丈夫与他的情人》(实则是描写丈夫与女儿的温情散文)。

嘉宾心有余悸地坦言:“我本就容易胡思乱想,所以除了天不怕地不怕之外,最怕的就是家里有个作家。”

[01:16:38](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=4598s) 究竟是心安理得,还是理得心安?独立与依赖的辩证

节目录制尾声,探讨落回现代家庭与两代人关系的心理本质。每个人在生活中面临的纷繁抉择,归根结底都是心理层面的自我安顿。

> “无论每个人的选择是心安理得,还是理得心安,每个人的选择都值得被尊重。”

窦文涛指出,每对父母与孩子都有自己的契约与相处逻辑,当焦虑产生时,最核心的反问应是自己的内心是否得到了真正的平静。幼婷在进修心理学后提出过一句经典概括:无论谁依赖谁、内心安宁与否,人终究必须清醒地意识到自己是孤独的个体。

但嘉宾们同时对当下社会过度神化“独立”的倾向提出了反思与纠偏: - 现代人往往将“我从不依靠任何人”当成至高无上的勋章和炫耀资本,这种单一价值观亟需平衡。 - 事实上,没有任何一个人的成就与生存是纯粹靠自己一人实现的。从日常维护秩序的交警、辅警到形形色色的社会分工,人无时无刻不在借助他人的托举以避免生活出轨。 - 真正的清醒,在于“既懂得人在现实中必须相互依存、心存感激,又在精神深处清醒接纳人最终注定要面对孤独”。

## Notable quotes > [44:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=2697s) 精神独立非常重要,但是精神独立要建立在一个基础上面:就是你对经济的要求不能太高。 — 许子东

> [03:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=194s) 你跟孩子是有爱的,你没法提要求,你当然也没法替换。 — 马未都

> [41:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=2485s) 很多年以后,多少年过去以后,你发现你自己在重复,走你父亲的路的时候,你才懂得尊敬你可怜的父亲。 — 许子东

> [44:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=2697s) 反正你挣的钱越多,你为他牺牲的自由就越多,这个账你自己去算。 — 阿城

> [01:16:38](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4&t=4598s) 无论每个人的选择是心安理得,还是理得心安,每个人的选择都值得被尊重。 — 窦文涛

## Mentioned 窦文涛, 幼婷, 马未都, 许子东, 马家辉, 周轶君, 阿城, 张爱玲, 马寅, 赵州禅师, 铃木大拙, 全职儿女互助中心, 都市女孩, Girls, 棋王, 六祖坛经, 心经, 国际劳工组织, 北京大学中国家庭追踪调查, 豆瓣, 阿那亚

## Video description 💡订阅我们,换个视角看懂万象: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwiWVn-hZq3_zuOk570kyGA

简介:《圆桌派》节目以圆桌为名,旨在体现圆桌席上人人平等,每期由窦文涛携手三位嘉宾,还原在生活中发生在圆桌旁、海阔天空的精彩聊天。延续真实不“装”的窦式主持风格,立足网络,放眼世间,神侃包罗万象的话题,嬉笑言谈中彼此迸发出智慧火花。

【圆桌派 窦文涛】人性 · 社会 · 认知:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYxKs_Kmt18U 【鸿观·宋鸿兵】金融 · 权力 · 逻辑:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLcTh2pbxeb-o 【观复嘟嘟 马未都】历史 · 收藏 · 人生:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLOBX8CQ3IYr0 【第一人称复数 周轶君】青年 · 女性 · 世界:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLE0SKDns16wY 【风马牛书房 冯仑】财富 · 经济 · 规律:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBtYaSLkGpag 【百家新说 尹烨】科技 · 生命 · 未来:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIUyn5AuyYUo 【众生 蔡永康】人物 · 命运 · 社会观察:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIOgZ1dPF0JA 【锵锵行天下 窦文涛】世界 · 文明 · 思想:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIJzYJ5gZ-HA

#中国未来 #中国社会 #植物 #生态 #大自然 #经济 #推荐 #热门 #经济 #圆桌派 #纪实 #时间 #历史 #文化 #聊天 #新闻 #心理健康 #中美关系 #科技 #经济 #金融 #香港 #台湾 #hongkong #taiwan #民生 #纪实 #纪录片 #窦文涛 #周轶君 #马未都 #许子东 #尹烨 #圆桌派第七季 #圆桌派 #中国经济 #中国内卷 #中国危机 #地方债 #新能源车 #光伏 #经济危机 #中国房地产 #中美竞争 #科技创新 #制度决定一切 #民营经济 #企业家精神 #AI时代

[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vcEtsXMQV4)

中文简报

半数年轻人工作后仍靠父母接济:“啃老”背后的真相与代际困境 节目围绕当下青年就业困境与“全职儿女”现象展开,窦文涛与马未都、许子东、幼婷等嘉宾深入拆解了代际经济依赖背后的社会根源。嘉宾们对比了北欧的高福利托底机制与东亚的家庭代际互助模式,指出在房产红利终结与阶层流动放缓的背景下,年轻人依靠父母资助往往是现实所迫而非单纯偷懒。对谈进一步探讨了金钱与家庭控制权、代际心理创伤、亲子边界感以及精神独立与经济独立的辩证关系,最终落脚于接纳代际互助、理解至亲局限并完成内在自我的和解。 国际劳工组织(ILO)数据显示全球 13 亿青年中有 2.67 亿人不上班不读书全靠父母,北京大学中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)亦显示中国适龄劳动力依赖父母的比例从 2010 年的不足 2% 飙升至 2018 年的超 40%。 (11:18) 当代青年难以超越父辈的财富鸿沟根源在于房产红利终结,老一辈依靠商品房制度红利积累起主要资产,而年轻一代仅凭工资收入在城市中已基本无法独立置业。 (13:27) 马未都指出“全职儿女”与“雇佣保姆”存在本质鸿沟,家庭内循环充斥着亲情之爱与无法替代性,使父母即便出资也难以彻底行使支配权与训斥权,但金钱依附常演变为加倍的心理控制与唠叨。 (3:14) 北欧芬兰通过高税收高福利机制将青年失业救济与老人护理直接转交政府承担,代际之间实现“无利益纯爱”,但该模式受限于国情人口,中国约 90% 老人仍必须依赖家庭居家养老。 (6:56)

Reading summary

节目指出,青年依赖父母或成为“全职儿女”并非单纯的个人怠惰,而是资产红利消退与职场高压下的全球性生存处境;家庭内部的经济资助虽能提供缓冲,但也常因情感捆绑与权力不对等引发代际内耗。 结构性困局与全球青年的代际差距 (11:18) 青年无法实现经济独立正成为跨国现象。国际劳工组织数据显示,全球13亿青年中有2.67亿人不工作也不在学;美国调查表明65%的Z世代与74%的00后认为自身财务积累滞后于父辈同龄水平;北京大学CFPS数据亦显示,中国适龄劳动力依赖父母的比例从2010年的不足2%跃升至2018年的40%以上。嘉宾分析,当代家庭财富的核心在于房产,老一辈受惠于商品房改革红利以低成本置产,而当代青年单凭薪资难以购房,导致资产积累天然无法超越父辈。即便在欧洲,1990年代起年轻人也普遍意识到生活水平难以企及普通的专业人士父母。 “家庭内循环”的代际互助与新型分工 (0:04) 在求职困难与父母衰老的双向需求下,部分家庭形成了“家庭内循环”。例如退休金近万元但缺乏数字技能与烹饪经验的老人,由全职在家的女儿料理医保、体检与三餐,双方各取所需。此外,全职子女还演化出家庭电商合伙、实地调研房市或监控银行高息定存等分工形式,甚至承担起家庭旅行的规划与落地。然而马未都强调,家庭互助与雇佣保姆存在本质分歧:雇佣关系属于纯契约,可考核与随时解雇;家庭关系则充斥着亲情与爱,父母即便对子女的服务不满意也难以严厉问责或断供,金钱无法转化为绝对的契约支配权。 制度救济与中外托底模式的差异 (6:56) 不同社会制度重塑了代际依赖的流向。芬兰等北欧高福利国家将青年失业救济、租房补贴及老年照护全部纳入政府体系,代际互动脱离了抚养与赡养的金钱捆绑,形成纯粹的情感往来,但这种模式依赖高税收与地广人稀的国情,难以普遍复制。相比之下,中国约90%的老人选择居家养老,庞大的人口基数决定了家庭仍是核心兜底载体。香港虽有综援兜底,但财政与居住空间紧张,援助水准无法与北欧相提并论,家庭在面对经济动荡时依然承担着极为沉重的互助压力。 经济依附下的心理规训与边界冲突 (20:09) 接受家庭供养往往伴随着高昂的心理代价。职场受挫促使年轻人退回家庭,但经济依附打破了代际界限,父母往往将出资转化为对婚恋、生育及生活细节的强力规训与说教,令子女陷入愧疚却无力反抗的循环。为了避免卷入无休止的压力,子女甚至演化出“装聋作哑”的防御机制。此外,许多空虚孤单的年迈父母试图以金钱绑定陪伴,将子女困于身边。嘉宾指出,破解内耗需要转变视角,既要理解年迈父母苛求背后如幼童求助般的无助,也需要建立物理与精神边界,避免将亲情异化为情感勒索。 精神独立的基础与父母的得体退场 (15:43) 针对精神独立与经济独立的关系,许子东认为缺乏经济独立通常难以实现精神独立,但其底线在于降低对物欲的要求,即“无欲则刚”,避免让欲望反噬自由。嘉宾认为,父母努力的终极意义在于为孩子提供“选择的机会”,而非包揽其人生;健康的家庭教育要求父母克服占有欲与“牺牲感”叙事,学会适时放手,接纳子女展翅远行。长期退缩在家庭舒适圈会使青年丧失应对现实风险的韧性,唯有走出家门、在外部世界的挫折中摸爬滚打,人生的经验与潜能才能被真正激活。 无论是全职陪伴还是外出闯荡,两代人各取所需的相处模式应当受到尊重。然而讨论留下了未解的张力:当社会过度拔高经济独立门槛时,两代人究竟该如何在现实的相互依存中划清界限,并在不平等的经济资助下保全彼此的精神自主。

Source quotes

[44:57] 许子东: 精神独立非常重要,但是精神独立要建立在一个基础上面:就是你对经济的要求不能太高。 [3:14] 马未都: 你跟孩子是有爱的,你没法提要求,你当然也没法替换。 [41:25] 许子东: 很多年以后,多少年过去以后,你发现你自己在重复,走你父亲的路的时候,你才懂得尊敬你可怜的父亲。 [44:57] 阿城: 反正你挣的钱越多,你为他牺牲的自由就越多,这个账你自己去算。 [76:38] 窦文涛: 无论每个人的选择是心安理得,还是理得心安,每个人的选择都值得被尊重。

Original transcript

[0:04] For the past seven years, we've been [0:06] discussing this behind the scenes. [0:08] >> How come he left right after the [0:10] recording? It was awkward, you know? [0:13] >> Don't look at the photos later. [0:15] >> I really often peek at his and Tie Ren's [0:19] life in Finland. [0:22] But what Youting just said was great, so [0:24] I think what Youting said and what we [0:27] wanted to talk about actually align; she [0:29] happens to be a mother of two children [0:31] now, right? [0:34] And she just imparted a very important [0:36] concept to me, which is that one should [0:39] be clear about accounts, and that [0:41] housework and being a mother is also a [0:43] job. [0:44] >> Hmm. [0:45] >> Isn't it? [0:46] >> Yes. [0:47] >> It can also be a source of income. [0:49] >> It can also be a source of income. [0:50] >> Then let me ask you another question: [0:53] what about being a child, what about [0:55] being a full-time child? [0:56] >> What does full-time mean? [0:58] >> Wow, look, look. You share some [1:01] situations in Finland with us, and I [1:02] want to share what we've been talking [1:04] about online here. [1:04] >> There is a term that doesn't sound very [1:06] nice. [1:07] >> It's called "living off one's parents." [1:09] >> I've heard of that. [1:10] >> Right, but now, we shouldn't [1:11] discriminate against any lifestyle. Hmm [1:14] . [1:14] >> There is a kind of person who is [1:16] justified in doing so. Living off [1:18] parents. For example, it's very [1:20] difficult to find a job now, right? [1:22] Right. They go home because they can't [1:25] find work. But for this young woman, her [1:28] parents 'combined pensions add up to [1:31] nearly ten thousand. [1:33] Her father isn't a good cook, and her [1:35] mother doesn't cook either. [1:38] The two elderly parents love to work, [1:41] but they don't understand modern [1:43] technology. [1:45] They can't figure out phones, paying [1:47] bills, or social security, so they just [1:50] like to go out and work. [1:54] With a daughter at home taking care of [1:56] all of this—buying insurance for her [1:59] parents, managing their daily life—when [2:01] they get home, the food is delicious. [2:06] And so, her parents give her the money, [2:09] not just as... [2:10] >> Which money do they give her? [2:12] >> They give her the money they earn. [2:14] >> They entrust her to manage it, so she [2:16] effectively takes care of... [2:18] >> Her parents' lives. The parents are [2:20] actually quite old. So, does that mean [2:22] they pay her a salary? [2:24] >> Not exactly, it's just that they give [2:25] her the money for daily expenses; she is [2:27] their child. But in reality, her role in [2:30] this family is the same as yours. Buying [2:32] insurance, taking them for medical [2:35] checkups, helping them out, and even [2:37] planning their trips; that’s how this [2:39] family survives. [2:40] >> Hmm. This daughter can be fully [2:43] justified. Two years ago, there was a [2:45] very popular discussion on Douban called [2:47] something like the "Full-Time Daughter [2:49] Exchange Center." [2:50] >> Hmm. [2:52] >> Many people look down on it, thinking [2:54] it’s some form of living off your [2:55] parents, but they would say, "Isn't my [2:57] labor...""... [2:58] >> worth this income?" In our family, we [3:00] all feel this is fine; parents are happy [3:03] their daughter doesn't have to leave, [3:05] maybe the only nagging is, "Why don't [3:07] you find a boyfriend? Why aren't you [3:09] married yet?" [3:10] >> But we’ve lived in peace this way, at [3:13] least up until now. [3:14] >> Nowadays, besides calling them a [3:16] full-time daughter, there’s an even [3:19] better name: family internal circulation [3:22] . Everyone talks about internal [3:24] circulation now, right? Internal [3:26] circulation economy means not relying on [3:29] the outside, we do it ourselves. Family [3:32] internal circulation is about whoever [3:34] earns the money spends it within the [3:36] home, because from a consumption [3:38] perspective, I... [3:42] >> For example, you handle everything for [3:44] me, so to me, you are a product; I'm [3:47] buying your service, right? [3:51] I give you the money, and you don't go [3:53] out and waste it, right? [3:56] You might buy things back, which is how [3:59] some describe family internal [4:01] circulation, but the point is, if it's a [4:03] full-time daughter, it’s still different [4:06] from hiring a domestic helper. [4:09] There’s a big difference between my [4:12] domestic helper and my daughter. I can [4:14] scold my helper if she does a poor job. [4:16] >> You wouldn't dare scold your daughter. [4:18] >> I wouldn't dare scold my daughter. [4:20] >> Right? My daughter cooks terribly, and [4:23] there’s an even more important [4:24] difference. [4:24] >> With a helper, you can... [4:26] >> Hire them this year and not next year. [4:28] >> Exactly, you can replace them. [4:29] >> Your children...... [4:31] >> cannot be replaced. [4:32] >> Your daughter manages all your household [4:34] affairs, and you still have to be [4:35] responsible for her...... [4:36] >> life. And you can't even make demands; [4:39] if I make a demand, it’s not me scolding [4:41] her, she turns around and scolds me. But [4:43] if you provide the money—meaning you [4:45] control the financial power over your [4:47] children—wouldn't you be able to speak [4:49] with more authority? Because...... [4:52] >> there’s a component of love involved. [4:54] With my helper, there's no love, please [4:57] don't have any love, you know? I’m [4:59] always terrified that my helper will [5:01] fall in love with me. Because my helper [5:03] often comes back saying, "Hey, my helper [5:05] friends all say, 'You are handsome, your [5:08] boss is handsome.'" Like that, and I get [5:11] terrified. Coming back to the point, you [5:13] have love with your children, so you [5:15] can't make demands, and of course, you [5:17] can't replace them. Is there a saying [5:20] for this in Hong Kong? They call having [5:22] children a "zero-capital business," [5:24] meaning there's no cost involved. [5:27] Generally speaking, even if I have [5:29] conflicts or arguments with you, two [5:31] days later I’ll still treat you well and [5:34] take you out for your birthday. [5:37] Is that a given? [5:39] >> Exactly, it’s a given, so you can't [5:42] really make too many demands, right? I [5:44] told my daughter her cooking was [5:46] terrible, and she said, "If it's [5:48] terrible, cook it yourself." Should I [5:51] stop giving her money? [5:52] >> Can you actually stop giving her money? [5:55] Yeah, you can't stop. [5:56] >> Right, you are all good parents. I’ve [6:00] heard that many young people studying [6:02] abroad are just clinging to that [6:04] lifestyle. But in reality, they can't [6:07] find jobs. This is a global issue. [6:10] There’s a TV show, an American series [6:13] called "Girls." Many people watched it [6:15] and felt a strong resonance, but they [6:17] still couldn't bring themselves to like [6:20] the girl. Why? Because this girl [6:22] represents a reality; girls like this [6:24] really exist. Her parents tell her, " [6:26] You’ve graduated, yet you're still [6:28] clinging to your life in New York. It's [6:31] been two years. We're just ordinary [6:33] teachers, we can't afford your phone [6:35] bills, your rent, or anything else," and [6:38] then the daughter says, "You know what? [6:40] All my friends are being subsidized by [6:43] their parents, right? [6:45] If you don't support me—there’s a girl I [6:48] know whose parents cut her off, and she [6:50] ended up having several abortions and [6:52] becoming a drug addict, so..." [6:54] >> You have cases like that? [6:56] >> That’s why Professor Ma mentions "love, [6:58] " which really refers to "relationships [7:00] ." After I moved to Finland, the thing I [7:02] thought about most, and most often, was [7:03] relationships. Because I had a child, I [7:05] became a more independent person. When [7:08] you want to rely on someone but have no [7:10] friends to turn to, I think about how [7:12] Finland teaches you independence from a [7:14] young age. It’s not just about the [7:16] mother being independent or the state [7:18] providing subsidies; even for children, [7:20] if you’re unemployed, the state helps [7:22] you. When you're unemployed, you don't [7:25] go to your mom for money, saying, "Mom, [7:27] I can't find a job, will you support me [7:29] ?" No, you go straight to social [7:31] services and say, "I can't find a job." [7:33] Then social services will ask, "Okay, [7:35] what are your career aspirations?"" [7:37] We’ll help you with training." Then, [7:39] they’ll give you money so you can at [7:41] least afford basic housing. They don't [7:44] tell you to move back home; they tell [7:46] you to rent a place outside. Of course, [7:48] not somewhere expensive, but at least [7:50] somewhere with basic food and shelter so [7:52] you can continue to look for work. To [7:55] find what you're looking for, right? So [7:57] , for everything, they think of the [7:58] government first, not their parents. [8:00] Likewise, when parents get old and need [8:02] help, they don't think about bringing [8:04] their kids home to care for them; they [8:06] think about asking the government, "Do I [8:09] have any retirement or old-age subsidies [8:11] ?" Right? Just like our social insurance [8:14] or pension, right? You start collecting [8:16] money, and once you have that, you start [8:18] thinking, "I need someone to look after [8:20] me," and the social services department [8:22] says, "Fine, we'll send a nurse to see [8:24] you for medicine, injections, or even [8:26] walks." They will come to see you at set [8:28] intervals and take you for a walk. So, [8:30] everyone can live alone, no matter your [8:33] age—excluding children, of course— [8:35] everyone can. That makes things [8:37] interesting. Their relationships aren't [8:40] as close-knit as ours, I have to admit, [8:43] but when they do choose to be together— [8:45] say, children and parents at my age—and [8:48] they are still willing to spend time [8:50] together, they tell me this is "pure [8:53] love," meaning this is true love. [8:55] >> There is no money involved between us. [8:58] Right? I truly love you, I truly like [9:01] you, and I enjoy being with you, which [9:03] is why I come back to see you. And you [9:05] also like being with me, so you come. My [9:07] friend's parents are so independent that [9:09] when he had to go on a four-day business [9:11] trip and had no one to look after his [9:13] child, he asked his parents to help. His [9:15] parents came down from central Finland, [9:17] but after two days of babysitting, they [9:18] said, "For the other two days, I'm going [9:20] to my summer cabin." Finns love their [9:22] summer cabins; they'd say, "I'm going to [9:24] my cabin, I'm staying at the cabin."" [9:26] >> It’s nothing major, not an emergency, [9:28] just find a nanny for the other two days [9:30] ." [9:30] >> Yeah, yeah. [9:31] >> And then they just left. It sounds like [9:34] another world, but you know, this [9:36] approach doesn't necessarily apply [9:38] everywhere, because look at how few [9:41] people there are there, right? [9:45] Besides, their society has developed for [9:47] so long under this so-called Nordic [9:50] high-welfare model, but I'm sure there [9:52] are issues there too, like higher [9:55] suicide rates and such, right? [9:57] >> Indeed, because their family [9:59] relationships aren't that harmonious—or [10:01] let's say, not that close—they truly [10:03] feel that when they have a problem, they [10:05] should turn to the government. I [10:07] wouldn't—I wouldn't seek help from [10:09] family or friends, and I feel the [10:11] situation in China is just too different [10:13] . With such a huge population, and [10:15] considering the way China approaches [10:17] elder care. [10:18] >> Regardless of your circumstances, [10:20] currently 90%of the elderly still age at [10:23] home. Hmm. [10:24] >> You could try to convince them that the [10:26] government provides and pays for [10:28] everything everywhere else in the world [10:30] , but I’m telling you, it’s impossible; [10:32] it’s deeply rooted in culture, history, [10:34] and national conditions. My own [10:36] experience with aging makes me realize [10:39] that for a considerably long time to [10:41] come, we will likely continue to have [10:43] the vast majority of the elderly aging [10:46] at home. [10:46] >> Hmm. [10:47] >> Actually, Hong Kong is also similar to [10:49] Finland in this regard. Really? [10:51] >> Yes, if you have no money in Hong Kong, [10:53] the government provides assistance. It’s [10:56] just that in Hong Kong, overall finances [10:58] and housing are so tight that what they [11:00] provide for a person’s livelihood isn't [11:02] as generous or comfortable as in Finland [11:04] , where it's nearly ten thousand dollars [11:06] . Many people have crunched the numbers [11:09] ; for some poorer families, all four [11:11] members receiving government assistance [11:13] is better than going out to work. Hmm, [11:15] this situation exists in Finland too, [11:18] right? [11:18] >> Yes, but I think we are truly in a [11:21] period of change unseen in millennia. [11:24] The world is changing, including the [11:26] West, which is also shifting. I’ve [11:29] looked at some figures recently. I [11:31] really doubt those numbers. [11:33] >> I even doubt if these numbers are real, [11:35] though they seem to come from [11:36] authoritative sources. [11:37] >> Hmm. Can you imagine? The International [11:41] Labour Organization released the " [11:43] Global Employment Trends for Youth 2020 [11:45] "—it might be even worse now—among the [11:48] world's 1.3 billion young people. How [11:50] many are not working? 267 million. [11:54] >> That's quite a lot. [11:56] >> 267 million rely on their parents for [11:59] care and financial support. [12:03] And then, there’s a 2023 survey on [12:06] Generation Z in the United States. [12:09] Do you know what Generation Z is? [12:11] >> Those born between 1995 and 2010—you’re [12:15] still clear on that, right? 65%of Gen Z [12:17] and 74%of those born after 2000 believe [12:20] their financial progress is far behind [12:23] that of their parents 'generation. Hmm. [12:26] >> Do you understand? It means that we used [12:28] to think kids were just lazy and [12:30] unwilling to endure hardship, but now, [12:32] many young people in places like [12:34] Shenzhen tell me, "You...you are the [12:35] generation that enjoyed the dividends of [12:38] the economic boom." Young people today [12:40] sometimes work harder and longer hours [12:42] than their parents did, yet they earn [12:45] much less money. It’s a global [12:47] phenomenon; they feel their financial [12:49] progress is far behind that of their [12:51] parents' generation, and the percentage [12:53] of them living with their parents is [12:55] much higher than in the past. Right, [12:57] according to data from Peking [12:58] University’s China Family Panel Studies [13:00] , the percentage of the working-age [13:02] population relying on their parents. I— [13:04] I can’t believe that number. It says [13:08] this rate of relying on parents jumped [13:11] from less than 2%in 2010 to over 40%in [13:15] 2018. [13:15] >> 40 percent. I think there might be a [13:18] problem with how they define "relying on [13:21] parents." Professor Zidong, do you give [13:23] your daughter money now? Jiahui, do you [13:25] give your daughter money? [13:27] >> I don’t give my daughter money, but I [13:29] remember a line from a movie where the [13:31] daughter says: "You should cherish the [13:33] fact that we’re still asking you for [13:34] money." [13:35] >> Exactly, exactly. [13:37] >> If my daughter really asked me for money [13:39] , I should cherish that opportunity, [13:41] right? [13:42] >> That was unthinkable when we were young [13:44] . [13:44] >> I mean, as soon as you graduated. It was [13:47] already difficult for parents to support [13:49] us through university back then. [13:50] >> What is the reason? Do you know? For the [13:53] vast majority of Chinese families today [13:55] , their wealth comes from real estate. [13:57] >> And houses were only acquired by our [14:00] parents 'generation—those now aged 40 or [14:02] 50 and above—during that transitional [14:05] period. But young people today, those [14:07] under 30, find it extremely difficult to [14:09] buy a house relying solely on their own [14:12] income; therefore, once property became [14:14] the main form of family wealth, the [14:16] children's generation could not surpass [14:18] their parents. [14:19] >> Right, right, that’s true. [14:20] >> You can’t surpass your parents, no [14:22] matter how hard you work. [14:23] >> Even if your salary is very high, you [14:26] won't necessarily surpass your parents, [14:28] which is why we see this 40%figure. [14:32] But there is a bigger situation that’s [14:34] even more concerning; a French friend of [14:37] mine recently came back, and he is the [14:39] only Asian, or Chinese, person in a [14:41] high-level administrative position at a [14:44] European university. [14:47] I asked when young people in Europe [14:50] started feeling that tomorrow wouldn't [14:52] be better, and he said after the 1990s. [14:56] >> Hmm. [14:58] >> He said after the 90s, young people in [15:01] Europe didn't think about whether the [15:03] world would be better in 20 years; they [15:05] realized, "I won't be able to live like [15:08] my parents did." [15:12] " [15:12] >> I can't have a house like theirs; they [15:14] aren't rich people, you know." [15:18] " [15:18] >> They aren't business people; they were [15:20] just professionals who finished [15:22] university, and by the time they reached [15:24] their 50s or 60s, they generally had two [15:27] homes—one in the city and one in the [15:29] suburbs." [15:31] However, young people in their twenties [15:34] or thirties today feel they won't have [15:36] this by the time they get old, nor do I [15:38] have the luxury to hand one of these [15:40] houses down to my children. [15:43] You have two sons waiting for you; think [15:45] about it, how can you live better than [15:48] your parents did? [15:49] >> But just think about how you... [15:52] >> Can your children expect to live the way [15:54] you do? This is a global issue, this is [15:58] a... [15:58] >> Just listen, let me ask you: look at our [16:01] kids—no, no, you and Iron Man's kids are [16:05] so adorable, seven and five years old. [16:08] Of course, let's not talk about [16:10] conditions in Northern Europe; let's say [16:13] it's in China, then... [16:15] >> People see that Iron Man has a great job [16:18] , earns good money, and you have [16:20] property and savings. [16:21] >> In the future, when the child grows up, [16:23] the money they earn might only allow [16:26] them to live a, let's say, rather [16:28] ordinary life. So, for example, if they [16:30] want to pursue their ideals, continue [16:32] their education, or even just drift for [16:34] a few years. Even until they're 30. But [16:37] you clearly have the means to support [16:39] them. Will you support them? [16:41] >> Support them. Just now, Professor [16:44] Zongdong said, I might not necessarily [16:46] leave a house for my son, right? I’ve [16:48] also discussed with Iron Man that we [16:50] might not be able to do what our parents [16:52] did, but...I want to give him the [16:54] opportunity to choose. My point is, if [16:56] he says, "I want a house today," I might [16:59] not be able to give it, but if you tell [17:01] me, "I'm a bit short on money, I want to [17:03] study abroad, or I want to drift for a [17:06] few years," as long as you're not just [17:08] staying home, I...I hope my efforts now [17:10] can give you the opportunity to choose. [17:12] Logically speaking, they should create [17:14] these opportunities themselves. [17:16] >> Right, you should support yourself or [17:18] whatever, but I think that’s why I [17:20] mentioned "living off one's parents." [17:21] >> It’s reasonable to build upon the [17:24] foundation you’ve been given, but if you [17:26] mean relying on it entirely, then I [17:28] don't think that's okay. If he says he's [17:31] coming back to take care of me, I don't [17:33] want that. After I had children, I [17:35] studied psychology. [17:36] >> Had children and studied psychology, [17:38] there must be a psychological issue [17:39] there, having children. Because you know [17:41] , I'm terrified that one day—since [17:43] parents are like this, right, this love [17:45] is so intense—but have you thought that [17:47] by giving so much love, one day you have [17:49] to let them go, right? And it’s best if [17:51] they don't even look back. Just like a [17:53] bird spreading its wings to fly high, [17:55] right? It just leaves us. [17:57] >> Yes, not looking back and not being [17:59] attached, that is what successful [18:01] education is, right? So, you have to [18:03] accept this sense of parting, right? I [18:06] don't—I don't want to use my tears or my [18:08] own potential psychological issues to [18:10] make them feel guilty, thinking I [18:12] shouldn't have left, I shouldn't have [18:14] flown away, I shouldn't have gone so far [18:16] , and that I should always be coming [18:19] home. No, my feeling is that I need to [18:21] be independent myself. And then, let you [18:24] fly very comfortably, right? That's why [18:27] I say I studied psychology. If you want [18:29] to come back, then, as I said before, [18:31] it's not a matter of money; it's purely [18:34] about having a clean relationship. If [18:36] you truly feel that our home brings you [18:38] mental happiness and support, and you [18:41] want to come back, then we certainly [18:43] will. [18:43] >> What if they don't want to work? [18:46] >> Will you keep supporting them? [18:47] >> So the values we need to cultivate now [18:50] are—you know, I lived at home until I [18:52] was 27 before I left to live in Hong [18:54] Kong. Before that, I didn't think there [18:57] was any problem with a girl living at [18:59] home until 27; I wasn't married. But [19:01] when I got to Hong Kong and now abroad, [19:04] when people hear I lived at home until [19:06] 27, everyone is in disbelief, saying, " [19:09] Why did you stay so long? 27, not 12, [19:12] right?" Then I said, "What's the problem [19:14] ? It's very normal in Asia." They said, [19:17] but if you don't leave—that is, if the [19:19] bird doesn't fly out of the nest—you [19:21] don't know the situation outside, you [19:22] don't know your own strength. In other [19:24] words, these children at home are very [19:26] comfortable, and everyone gets what they [19:28] need, right? But I think you will forget [19:31] your own abilities. You will not have [19:33] the opportunity to experience setbacks. [19:35] >> Only when you have the ability can you [19:37] actually dare to have your next home. [19:40] Because many full-time children now face [19:42] the problem that when they go out, it's [19:45] not as beautiful as they imagined, with [19:47] opportunities for training or expressing [19:50] themselves. [19:52] They think, "I don't have that; I'm [19:55] suffering, getting scolded by the boss, [19:59] working 996, earning low wages." [20:03] It's also different from the previous [20:05] generation, as we've entered what's [20:07] called a risk society over the past ten [20:09] years or so. [20:12] >> In the past, there was a predictable [20:14] path; you’d enter a field and know [20:17] roughly how much you could earn at each [20:19] stage. Now, that’s gone. Every three or [20:23] four years, there’s some storm or [20:25] economic collapse. They face all sorts [20:28] of pressures, and there’s a ninety [20:31] percent chance that after a few years of [20:33] working, their personality ends up more [20:35] twisted than yours, right? [20:38] You talk about seeing a therapist or [20:40] studying psychology—they’re twisted, and [20:43] that’s not even mentioning the physical [20:45] toll. It’s truly painful and a massive [20:48] struggle for them. So, from that [20:51] perspective, if parents have the means [20:53] to ease their children's hardships, I [20:55] personally don't see any problem with it [20:58] . [20:58] However, the reality is that there [21:01] really aren't many good options out [21:03] there. Exactly. [21:05] >> This is definitely a cause for concern. [21:08] When I see some of these reports, I get [21:10] this image in my head—like something [21:13] from a contemporary painting—of a lonely [21:16] little boy in the Nordic wilderness, [21:18] completely desolate, essentially being a [21:21] full-time child at home. Actually, it’s [21:24] mostly because they can't find an ideal [21:26] job; that’s the biggest problem. No one [21:29] really thinks this is a long-term [21:31] solution, but then you hear them say one [21:34] thing. They say, if they’re going to be [21:37] gaslighted by some unreliable boss [21:39] anyway, they might as well be gaslighted [21:41] by their parents. But I think, aren’t [21:44] they already being gaslighted by taking [21:46] their parents' money? I think this [21:48] exposes a lot of things deep within [21:51] human nature. If you don't take your [21:53] parents 'money. The way your parents [21:56] treat you keeps a certain boundary. Once [21:59] you take their money, or they support [22:01] you, or pay your mortgage, the way they [22:03] treat you—the level of intensity—is [22:06] completely different. [22:07] >> Right? Where are you going to go? So [22:10] some young people swear, "I'll never [22:12] take their money again, I'm done taking [22:15] their money." But when they end up [22:16] taking the money again the following [22:18] month, they feel terrible. Many parents [22:20] , when giving money, start nagging: " [22:21] Why haven't you found a boyfriend yet?" [22:23] "What are you doing? What's wrong with [22:25] you?""We're getting old, don't you need [22:27] to leave us a child, a grandchild?""And [22:29] you're just drifting around all day; [22:31] what do you think you're doing?""You [22:32] could choose not to listen." But on one [22:34] hand, you still have to take their money [22:36] . And on the other hand? They lecture [22:39] you every single day. Oh, when I think [22:42] about these kids, these young people, [22:44] it’s really tough. [22:45] >> Living at home means you're under your [22:48] parents' financial shelter and [22:50] protection. [22:54] It's different when parents help with a [22:56] mortgage; I see that as supporting their [22:59] children's independence. [23:06] That’s clear-cut, as it’s for building [23:09] equity and future assets, unlike hiding [23:11] at home to avoid the world's challenges [23:14] . [23:17] When you think about it, our lives are [23:19] essentially composed of two currencies. [23:22] One currency is money. And what is the [23:26] other currency? Time. [23:35] Looking back at their youth and middle [23:38] age, people’s biggest regret is seeing [23:40] everyone in the subways and streets just [23:43] trading their time for a meager living. [23:52] >> So, looking back, I completely agree [23:55] with the values you just mentioned. [23:59] >> Parents want their children to succeed, [24:02] to be independent and strong, which is [24:04] worth supporting. [24:10] But to be more abstract, philosophically [24:13] speaking, if you do something not out of [24:16] interest or meaning, but only for profit [24:19] , you're trading time for money—avoid it [24:22] if you can. [24:27] >> There’s a paradox in that, which is very [24:30] difficult to prove, you know? [24:33] The so-called "meaning" of work and [24:36] finding one's interests. [24:39] Sometimes you have to be more abstract; [24:42] you have to find it through hardship. [24:46] You can't just say, "I'll take two years [24:49] off." [24:50] >> Sitting at home thinking about what to [24:53] do, calculating your interests and [24:55] abilities for two years, then trying to [24:58] go out—it’s very difficult. Those of us [25:01] who have worked for decades know this. [25:05] You never know where the first step will [25:07] lead you—to the second, then the third. [25:12] I often tell young people who ask me [25:15] about job choices that I always remind [25:18] them of this. [25:21] You should look for a job that can lead [25:23] you to the next step. [25:27] Of course, I’m talking ideals; often we [25:30] don't know, so sometimes you just take [25:32] the first job that comes. [25:37] You might indeed be exploited or [25:39] underpaid at first. [25:42] But within that experience, you discover [25:44] where your talents lie. You learn skills [25:47] , and you find new opportunities. [25:50] I did a very boring job for ten months, [25:53] and on the first day of the 11th month, [25:56] I suddenly met a partner. [25:59] I learned a lot from them, and they [26:01] talked about developing a project and [26:03] asked me to collaborate. [26:05] You never know, you really never know. [26:08] >> This is a very positive outlook on life [26:11] . [26:13] >> It means you can't just talk about [26:15] whether you're interested or whether [26:17] what you're doing is meaningful. [26:19] It might look like I have no interest [26:22] and no sense of purpose, as if I'm only [26:24] doing it for a bit of money, but it [26:26] could turn into something. For example, [26:29] working as a ticket collector at a movie [26:31] theater, right? After ten months of [26:33] collecting tickets, I learned how to [26:36] write short stories. You really don't [26:38] know that life is an accumulation. I [26:41] believe that since I left home for Hong [26:43] Kong at 27, the time I spent in Hong [26:45] Kong was, looking back, the lowest point [26:48] of my life. But without that... [26:50] >> Hong Kong was your low point? [26:52] >> Really. [26:53] >> Is it? What do you take me for? What do [26:56] you take us for? So that was the low [26:58] point of your life? [26:59] >> No, but it really was the parent company [27:02] , yeah. But it's just that I hit my [27:05] lowest point, and looking back now, I [27:07] genuinely feel that without all of that [27:10] ...Life needs a story to be exciting, [27:13] right? Your story can't always be at a [27:16] high, so I think you have to go out and [27:19] explore, and you have to hit those lows [27:22] . It's just like playing a game and [27:24] passing levels. In a game, if you die, [27:27] you just turn it back on the next day [27:28] and you're alive again. Back to full [27:31] health. [27:31] >> Back to full health, exactly. Everything [27:33] is just a matter of perspective. [27:35] >> You-Ting, using the gaming analogy is [27:37] great. Gaming... [27:38] >> Speaking of your hobby. [27:40] >> There's a key element in gaming: [27:42] unlocking. Right. [27:43] >> Unlocking, unlocking new abilities or [27:46] weapons. It's very difficult to just sit [27:49] at home and suddenly have achievements, [27:52] abilities, or dreams unlocked. It's hard [27:55] . You have to be out there colliding [27:58] with things, even when you're at your [28:00] so-called lowest and most difficult [28:02] point, that's when a certain part of you [28:05] can unlock. [28:07] But when talking about full-time [28:09] daughters, let's not forget there's a [28:12] large group of people who want to be [28:14] full-time daughters but have no way, no [28:17] ability, no such parents, and no [28:19] conditions. [28:21] I hear from some young friends that [28:23] there's actually a significant conflict [28:25] between these two groups. Seeing my [28:27] friends or besties go back home to be a [28:30] full-time daughter, hey, I want that too [28:32] , okay? I want it too, but I don't have [28:35] it. My parents don't have the money, so [28:38] this kind of complaint is actually a [28:40] form of humblebragging. Right. [28:42] >> No, in a sense, this kind of complaint [28:45] also shows that social wealth is [28:47] increasing. You have to admit that in an [28:49] absolute sense, compared to when we were [28:51] young, wouldn't you say the percentage [28:53] of people who don't have to worry about [28:55] food and clothing is much higher? Didn't [28:57] China solve poverty? Right? So, just [29:00] like what was said before, you just add [29:02] an extra pair of chopsticks when you [29:03] come home for dinner. It's like the [29:05] concept in Japan called "parasite [29:07] singles." [29:07] >> It refers to this group of people who [29:09] don't want to get married. However, they [29:11] live with their parents, and their main [29:13] living expenses are covered by them, [29:15] while they just do some part-time work [29:17] for their own pocket money. Many people [29:19] in Japan live like this their whole [29:21] lives. This is a lifestyle, a symbiosis [29:25] with parents, you know? [29:27] Now, some parents are actually quite [29:30] interesting too. They say, "I don't want [29:33] my child to go out and suffer. If you [29:35] want to work, go work, but if you stay [29:37] here, that's fine too. My pension is [29:39] enough to support you." [29:41] >> Giving them a choice, right? But within [29:44] this dynamic, besides the conflicts [29:46] between groups, and some envy, jealousy [29:49] , and resentment, [29:50] >> Right. [29:51] >> We should also note that "shared family [29:53] " life can have different ways of [29:56] functioning. [29:57] It doesn't have to be just you acting as [30:00] my domestic helper; we can plan things [30:02] together. [30:04] Certain things, especially in the [30:06] internet age—I know in Hong Kong, where [30:08] life is perhaps too difficult and [30:10] everyone is looking for ways to make [30:12] money, some families live together with [30:14] their adult children and run an online [30:16] shop. It's quite fun; they wholesale [30:19] some small items. [30:20] >> The parents and the daughter—the parents [30:22] don't understand how the platform works [30:25] , but they have the capital. [30:26] >> The daughter understands. Instead of [30:29] being my full-time daughter at home, [30:32] don't just sit around. [30:34] You're my daughter, but you can also be [30:36] my business partner. [30:38] We'll start a small online shop, and [30:41] I'll cover the costs. What else do many [30:44] Hong Kong families do? The daughter [30:46] stays home and helps trade stocks. Or [30:48] property speculation. You have the time [30:51] , but Mom doesn't. You have the time to [30:53] go check out properties every day, which [30:55] is Hong Kong people's favorite activity [30:57] —house hunting. Going to look at [30:59] properties and browsing online every [31:01] single day. In this current climate, [31:04] parents would surely tell you to take a [31:06] break and go house hunting. [31:08] >> Real estate is a no-go for now, [31:11] >> let's take a break. [31:12] >> Hey, this is fun. You know, because Hong [31:15] Kong's real estate market has been [31:17] sluggish for two years, everyone still [31:19] wants to invest and make money, so doing [31:21] this is quite fun. I look for fixed-term [31:23] deposits at banks. Because every bank [31:26] has different interest rates, and they [31:28] change every day, every single day. [31:30] >> Hey, you kids keep an eye on it for me. [31:32] Check the rates for me daily. If Bank [31:35] A's rate goes up from 3.6 to 3.7 for a [31:38] two-month term, tell me immediately, and [31:41] I'll move that money over. If tomorrow [31:44] another bank hits 3.8, I'll move the [31:46] money there. It's fun, I've been playing [31:49] with it. [31:50] >> You've been playing with it? Which bank [31:53] ? Let me tell you, in Hong Kong, I [31:56] actually earned some interest. [31:58] A bank financial manager told me that if [32:01] you convert your money into British [32:03] pounds, the interest rate for these two [32:06] months seems higher than what you get [32:08] with HKD. [32:09] Anyway, it's higher, I don't really get [32:12] it, but the interest is high. I [32:14] deposited a little bit, and it turned [32:16] out to be true, but they are all [32:18] short-term, just one or two months. You [32:21] know, when I saw this trick was good, I [32:23] felt like I was almost financially free [32:25] , right? I thought, maybe I’ll just stop [32:27] working and do this instead, wouldn't [32:29] that be nice? So every day, bang, I made [32:32] a bold decision and just, bang, invested [32:35] the money. [32:35] >> Invested it, but you know, since we work [32:38] all the time, my mind, [32:39] >> Hmm, [32:40] >> had long forgotten about it. [32:42] >> Had long forgotten, and then, [32:44] >> one day, I checked my account and there [32:46] were only a few dollars left. [32:48] >> Ah! [32:49] >> How could that be? [32:51] >> It was my savings account. [32:52] >> Oh. [32:53] >> Oh, it scared me! You know, at least I [32:56] gained this experience—have you ever [32:59] experienced your money in the bank [33:01] suddenly becoming zero? [33:03] >> Wow, my mind just went blank, thinking, [33:07] "What do I do? Should I call the bank?" [33:10] >> Who are they? [33:11] >> I couldn't explain anything clearly. [33:13] >> Yeah, that whole day I was in a state of [33:16] —I felt like, oh my god, the sky had [33:18] gone dark. I really felt like everything [33:21] went black before my eyes; I was so [33:23] scared. [33:24] >> Tell us the ending quickly, it’s too [33:26] stressful! [33:27] >> The ending is that I had moved all the [33:29] money from my original account into that [33:31] one-month term deposit. [33:33] >> I switched to a different account. I [33:35] didn't really understand it, but when [33:37] you check the savings account, it’s just [33:40] gone, you know? [33:41] This whole thing just proves I'm a [33:44] novice; it gave me quite a fright. [33:47] Their strategy is to lure money away [33:49] from other banks by offering high [33:51] interest for three months, but then you [33:53] have to transfer it out in time after [33:56] three months; isn't that a hassle? [33:58] >> Right? You know, people are becoming [34:00] more and more forgetful these days. You [34:01] completely forget about things that [34:03] happened two months ago. [34:04] >> Ah, humblebragging again; that’s quite a [34:07] sum, I’ll rely on that for my retirement [34:10] . I thought I’d run into some kind of [34:13] scam. A fraud ring, you know. [34:16] You're just busy being important; many [34:18] of my friends and I enjoy this—when they [34:21] ask me what I've been busy with lately. [34:24] I tell them I'm busy filling out forms, [34:26] moving money here and there every day, [34:29] and I find it very satisfying, like I’ve [34:31] actually gained something. Banks have [34:34] had the upper hand for so many years [34:36] with low interest rates, but it's only [34:38] been high for two years, and now I’m [34:40] finally getting back at them. 3.8%here, [34:42] 3.85%there, then filling out a form for [34:45] 3.85%or 3.9%—just filling out forms. [34:47] Very, very happy. What is the financial [34:50] relationship like between parents and [34:52] children in Finland? [34:53] >> I'd say they don't want to. [34:56] >> Originally they didn't, but in the last [34:58] year or two, because the global economy [35:01] is really in bad shape, the news has [35:03] been constantly talking about how [35:05] Finnish children now need their parents [35:07] 'help to afford a home; this becoming a [35:10] news topic just shows it's a new trend, [35:12] right? [35:13] >> Meaning in the past... [35:15] >> It will quickly become a universal value [35:17] . Yes. But what I find interesting is [35:20] their final conclusion. In Finland, you [35:23] can't just buy or live in government [35:25] housing whenever you want. [35:29] In many communities, they might [35:31] designate a specific building to be [35:33] rented or sold only to artists; you need [35:36] proof from a music conservatory or [35:38] performance credentials to buy into that [35:40] building, and even within a single [35:42] building in a good area, some floors [35:44] might be reserved for people below a [35:46] certain income level, and the price [35:48] isn't set by market value. [35:54] >> It's not the same building as the [35:56] artists' one, no; artists are artists, [35:58] but if you look at it from a drone's [36:01] perspective, you can tell that in their [36:03] planning, they intended to mix different [36:06] types of people together. [36:08] >> So you wouldn't know which is which; you [36:11] wouldn't walk by and say, "This is where [36:13] the poor live," right? No. And also, he [36:15] ...and for...he wants to let wealthy [36:17] people live here too, because they [36:19] believe that once anyone connects with [36:21] the community, they will become invested [36:24] . Once you identify with it, you want to [36:26] build it, or some children with, let's [36:27] say, better resources, will have better [36:29] development, and they will influence the [36:31] kids around them because you're all [36:33] playing in the same school, right? So he [36:35] means that, in this way, we can all [36:37] improve together. [36:39] >> Professor Xu, let me ask you a question [36:41] . [36:41] >> This is a big, philosophical question. [36:45] >> Is financial independence a prerequisite [36:47] for mental independence? Is it [36:49] impossible to have mental independence [36:51] without financial independence? [36:53] >> There are certainly a few exceptions, [36:55] but in general, that should be the case [36:57] . [36:57] >> So which one must come first? [36:59] >> Ah. [37:00] >> Which independence leads to the next? [37:02] >> It is generally believed that without [37:03] financial independence, [37:04] >> you cannot have mental independence. [37:06] >> Is it possible to have mental [37:07] independence? What do you think? [37:09] >> But what is the meaning of this [37:10] independence? Given everything we've [37:12] just said, I feel we’ve set the bar very [37:15] high, like needing a house or having a [37:17] certain level of income, but. If I just [37:19] —we just mentioned that the Finnish [37:21] government gives a lot of money, they [37:22] give what is very basic, meaning they [37:24] won't let you spend more than you have. [37:26] >> I was just about to ask, how much can a [37:28] mother receive? [37:29] >> Yes, yes, yes. [37:30] >> First-time mother. [37:31] >> First-time mother, all added up. [37:33] >> The first child, not the first mother, [37:34] becoming a mother for the first time. [37:36] >> Around 600 Euros. [37:37] >> A month? [37:39] >> A month. [37:40] >> 600, that’s equivalent to about 5,000 [37:41] Hong Kong dollars, five or six thousand [37:43] dollars. [37:43] >> Yes. [37:44] >> Well, that's not bad. [37:46] >> Have a few more, and you're set [37:47] financially. But it doesn't mean 600 [37:49] Euros becomes 1,200 Euros for the second [37:51] ; it's not that kind of addition, right [37:52] , it doesn't mean having ten kids gets [37:54] you 60,000. [37:55] >> No, no, no, no, no, no, that's not it. [37:57] >> Then you'd just be a baby-making machine [38:00] , busy doing just one thing every day. [38:02] >> Europeans seeing this Chinese way of [38:05] calculating. [38:06] >> It’s not like that, there are many [38:09] details, so no. [38:11] It touches on the issue that parents [38:14] supporting their children—I really think [38:16] when everyone talks about the economic [38:18] downturn, I tend to look on the bright [38:20] side, and I think, after all, parents do [38:23] have some money in their hands. [38:26] This is completely different from when [38:28] my parents gave me 50 yuan for a month [38:30] or a semester during college, which [38:33] wasn't even enough for food. That's [38:35] totally different. You see, I ran into a [38:37] friend the other day, a married couple, [38:39] and I noticed how much the mother was [38:41] planning for their child. She came up to [38:43] me and said, "Look, my husband makes [38:44] tens of thousands a month, and I take a [38:46] few thousand every month to buy [38:48] insurance for our child." Then she said [38:50] her husband wanted to invest in some [38:52] property, and she told him that he had [38:54] to put the child's name on it. She said [38:56] , "I even forced my husband to write a [38:58] will recently, you know that?""You can't [39:00] leave it to your parents; it has to be [39:02] for our child.""I'm worried about [39:04] inheritance taxes, so I want to leave it [39:06] to our child. I think a mother should be [39:07] able to worry about her child." Later, [39:09] the husband said, "I can't just ignore [39:12] my parents in the future, right?" She [39:14] said, "At most, write that if your [39:16] parents have financial difficulties, our [39:18] child can help them out." Anyway, [39:20] hearing all these things was actually [39:22] quite funny. It made me realize that [39:24] even if you're just a middle-income [39:26] family. I mean, if a mother plans as [39:29] meticulously as this, actually, as long [39:31] as your child isn't extravagant. She's [39:34] planning everything, even retirement [39:36] insurance for the child, calculating how [39:39] much the child will receive from the [39:41] bank each month years later. [39:43] I started to think about the possibility [39:46] that they could get by without working, [39:48] as long as they aren't extravagant, by [39:50] relying on the finances their parents [39:52] arranged. [39:53] >> They could, but they wouldn't be happy, [39:55] would they? [39:56] >> That is the key point. I'm saying that, [39:59] looking at the data, it's really [40:01] different from our generation; most of [40:04] them receive some form of financial [40:06] support from their parents. That's not a [40:09] small amount. [40:10] >> The times are different. [40:13] If you look at our age group, having [40:15] gone through years of economic [40:17] development, we've all accumulated some [40:19] wealth to a certain degree. [40:22] From the perspective of the next [40:24] generation, isn't there talk of " [40:26] sharing"? I mean, regarding having kids [40:29] , why... [40:30] >> I, I want... [40:32] >> Bike sharing. [40:33] >> Do we want shared prosperity? Common [40:36] prosperity. [40:37] >> That's good enough. [40:38] >> Right, don't look at it from the child's [40:40] perspective. You have the perspective of [40:42] the children, but I'm not asking for all [40:44] the money right now. I, and as for the [40:46] difficulties I'm facing out there as we [40:49] just discussed, I'm in trouble now, and [40:51] I really don't necessarily have to rely [40:54] on that "sharing" of yours, but the [40:56] question is, what are you supposed to do [40:58] after you share? [41:00] I have a friend whose children rely [41:02] primarily on the family, but his kids [41:05] have taken on a very important [41:07] responsibility that I think is great: [41:09] planning their family trips every year, [41:11] going out two or three times to places [41:14] that are harder to visit. [41:18] The kids plan the itinerary, book the [41:21] flights and hotels, allowing their [41:23] parents to enjoy a wonderful, happy [41:25] journey outside of their busy work lives [41:28] . [41:30] I think this is also very good; life has [41:33] some really great periods, and what else [41:36] is a family for? [41:40] The kids are responsible for planning [41:43] the dining and cuisine—deciding which [41:45] restaurant to go to on the weekend and [41:47] what to eat—which allows parents who [41:50] lack the knowledge or time to plan to [41:52] enrich their own lives. [41:55] So, children aren't just taking for free [41:58] ; they bring back a quite rich and [42:01] beautiful life for their parents. [42:04] The point isn't just about what teachers [42:06] say—whether children shouldn't be [42:08] working or living at home, or whether [42:11] parents should pamper them. [42:14] Every family has its own circumstances; [42:17] the key is, given those conditions, can [42:20] you make full use of them to enrich the [42:22] lives of both generations? [42:25] >> I think this [42:26] >> has a greater impact on the younger [42:28] generation, which is instead being [42:30] overlooked. Right now, we talk more from [42:33] the parents 'perspective: as long as I [42:35] have the money, why shouldn't I... [42:40] Spend it on your children however you [42:42] like; what's wrong with that? [42:44] But the problem is, for the younger [42:47] generation, the impact is very profound [42:50] . [42:51] Think back carefully: how you view your [42:53] parents when you are young and how you [42:56] evaluate them will affect the younger [42:58] generation's basic view of society. [43:01] >> Truly. [43:03] >> It will affect their fundamental [43:05] worldview. [43:07] In the last few decades, many [43:09] protagonists in literature have been [43:12] young boys. [43:15] Their attitude toward their fathers has [43:17] changed. To summarize simply, it's pity [43:21] . [43:23] These young people realize they can't [43:25] rely on their parents, that their [43:27] parents are actually quite pitiable, and [43:30] they also find their parents to be loyal [43:32] and simple. [43:36] So I've discovered a thread: whether in [43:39] novels or in real life, how you judge [43:41] your father basically defines that young [43:44] person's own worldview. [43:47] >> Yes. [43:48] >> It's that your father has been wronged [43:51] by society. We often—I reflect on myself [43:53] , and I was the same—when we see our [43:56] fathers as pitiful, we didn't think they [43:58] were pitiful back then; back then we [44:00] just blamed them, thinking, "Why are you [44:03] so useless?""Why are you standing in [44:05] this position at this moment?""Standing [44:07] here at this time, when you clearly [44:09] could have had a higher position; why?" [44:11] After all these years, however many [44:13] years have passed, you realize you're [44:14] repeating the past, walking in your [44:16] father's footsteps, and only then do you [44:18] learn to respect your poor father. [44:19] >> Mm. [44:20] >> Respect your own poor father. That’s a [44:24] young person’s positive worldview. [44:26] >> That’s very profound. [44:28] >> That’s really deep. [44:30] >> Your current situation of staying at [44:32] home for two more years is related, but [44:34] not entirely the same thing. Also, if [44:37] you stay home for two more years by [44:38] choice, it means both sides get what [44:40] they need, and you stay happily, then [44:42] there’s the possibility Teacher Wang [44:44] mentioned, even new creations and [44:46] infinite potential. But if it turns into [44:48] resentment, feeling forced to stay [44:49] because the outside world is awful and [44:51] you have to rely on your parents, and [44:53] your mother is unhappy about giving, [44:55] then that creates new family conflicts. [44:57] I found that after I moved out, my [44:59] relationship with my mother improved a [45:01] lot, right? Because once there's [45:03] distance, everything...I believe more [45:04] and more in a relationship as pure as [45:06] water. [45:06] >> Is your mother-daughter relationship [45:08] with your mom like water now? [45:09] >> Yes, because before we were too close; [45:11] she had to know exactly what time I got [45:13] home. [45:13] >> She had to have a say in what I wore. [45:15] Right, and even if it was 11:59, she’d [45:17] come out and say, "Didn't you say you'd [45:19] be home by 12?" I’d say, "Isn't it 11:59 [45:22] right now? Do you have to be so precise [45:24] ?" Then I’d just go to sleep. So, is it [45:26] just because of that one sentence? Daily [45:28] life is just all these little things, [45:30] and you realize you just can't... [45:31] >> It’s the warmth of Chinese society, with [45:34] a lot of resistance; girls her age are [45:36] all like this. Hey, why do you think [45:39] mothers are like that? [45:41] >> She’s afraid her daughter will suffer [45:43] ... [45:44] What, going home? [45:46] >> Lots of worries, which is why you said [45:48] economic independence leads to mental [45:50] independence, but I’ve been wondering— [45:52] is that really true? Is it? Because what [45:54] I want for my child isn't necessarily [45:56] economic independence; I study [45:58] psychology to enrich myself because I [46:00] just hope she’s mentally independent, [46:02] because I feel that only a mentally [46:04] independent child...... [46:06] >> can be economically independent? [46:08] >> Right, she’ll be able to withstand all [46:10] the setbacks outside and still feel that [46:12] she is capable. I won’t hide away [46:14] forever. I can hide, but I won’t hide my [46:16] whole life; I’ll hide for a bit, take a [46:19] break. Just as you said, recharged and [46:21] ready, then I’ll head out again. So what [46:23] I want for him is economic independence [46:25] . This line of thought is also quite [46:27] interesting; without spiritual [46:28] independence, your economic independence [46:30] won't ultimately be independent either, [46:32] meaning your personality can't truly be [46:33] independent. [46:34] >> Because you rely on it. Spiritual [46:36] independence is very important, but it [46:39] must be built on a foundation: your [46:41] economic demands cannot be too high. [46:44] >> Didn't Lu Xun say in "Regret for the [46:46] Past" that love must be based on [46:48] something? [46:48] >> Yes, that part in "The Chess Master" [46:50] says it best, where he says we live for [46:53] chess, not for a living. There is a [46:55] contradiction in it. First, it talks [46:57] about Wang Yisheng playing chess, saying [46:59] that once he plays, he doesn't need to [47:01] eat. He says, "No, that's not right, I [47:03] still need to eat," and he is actually [47:05] very particular about his food. But [47:07] people ask, "Since you live for chess [47:10] and not for a living, why do you pursue [47:13] this?" He just says, "Then your desire [47:15] for a living cannot be too strong." [47:17] Turning this back to your situation, it [47:19] means your child should have his own [47:21] opinions. But to have these opinions, [47:23] you cannot be too extravagant, and you [47:25] cannot have high economic demands. [47:27] >> Because [47:28] >> If your economic demands are too high, [47:30] it is very hard to maintain your ideals [47:32] . [47:33] >> Sorry to cut in, but you mentioned "The [47:35] Chess Master" by A Cheng, right? [47:38] >> I keep repeating this, because even [47:41] today I truly appreciate what A Cheng [47:43] said when we were eating together many [47:46] years ago. [47:48] I was talking about wanting to make [47:50] money and so on, and he said, "In any [47:52] case, the more money you make, the more [47:54] freedom you sacrifice for it. [47:57] You calculate that balance yourself." [48:00] >> Right? Later I realized it’s really like [48:04] that. If you don't earn much, you are [48:06] more free, but if you want to earn more [48:09] , you have to accept more constraints. [48:11] >> This can be summed up in four words: " [48:13] Freedom from desire leads to strength." [48:15] >> And "Desire leads to weakness," right? [48:17] Yes. We can't achieve total freedom from [48:19] desire, [48:20] >> but we just shouldn't let our desires [48:21] get too strong. That's it. [48:23] >> Because when you are spiritually [48:24] independent, your values become [48:25] diversified. [48:26] >> That is [48:27] >> This is a new perspective, interesting. [48:29] Spiritual in— [48:31] >> Your values become diversified; you no [48:33] longer use money as the sole measure of [48:35] good or bad. [48:36] >> Right, regardless of what the mainstream [48:38] society is today, you will have your own [48:40] , which means having strong opinions. So [48:42] , I give him that sense of spiritual [48:44] independence now. I hope, in my ideal, [48:46] when people ask what the definition of a [48:48] good son is, I say I have no definition [48:50] for a good son. Because you have a good [48:52] son, you place expectations on him. He [48:54] didn't choose this; you wanted him to [48:55] come into this world, he didn't choose [48:56] to come here, so there is no such thing [48:58] as raising children to provide for your [49:00] old age, none at all. Because I feel [49:01] it's just giving him a—it's like a magic [49:03] headband. Wherever he goes, if you carry [49:05] this idea, even if you don't say it, he [49:07] carries this curse, and he will never be [49:09] free his whole life. He won't go far; [49:10] just like I said before, he won't fly [49:12] far. So there is no "raising for old age [49:14] ," no—actually, the only thing I hope to [49:16] give you is that you can know what you [49:18] want to do, who you are, and what your [49:20] strengths are. And then choose something [49:22] you want; that value might not be my [49:23] value, it might not be society's value, [49:25] but if it's a value you believe you can [49:27] achieve or one you love, that is the [49:29] most important thing. So, I must first [49:31] become a spiritually independent parent [49:34] . [49:34] >> Right, right, see a psychologist first. [49:37] Yes, study psychology first. My [49:39] happiness is entirely reliant on the [49:41] child, I am now entirely— [49:43] >> First of all, you have to save yourself [49:46] ; you must be spiritually independent. [49:48] >> No, you—you then have to tell the "Iron [49:50] Man" that my financial independence is [49:53] an issue, you are responsible for it. [49:55] >> Then I wouldn't need to sit here. [49:58] I completely agree with what you said, [50:01] and the interesting thing can be [50:03] expressed in reverse. [50:06] Because when your values become diverse [50:09] , it is easier for you to be spiritually [50:11] independent. [50:14] >> If your values aren't diverse, and it's [50:17] always just "I want my life to [50:19] constantly satisfy my desires, I want to [50:21] pursue economic growth," then it's very [50:24] hard to be spiritually independent; you [50:26] will be led around by all sorts of [50:29] people and matters related to your [50:31] finances. [50:33] So you first— [50:36] Exactly, whether I'm an artist, or even [50:39] just an ordinary person who only knows [50:42] how to love food, as long as I have [50:44] important values within my own circle of [50:47] life, then I can also be spiritually [50:50] independent. [50:52] >> But I have a very strange feeling; the [50:54] people around me all seem to be good [50:57] parents. For instance, I know Mr. Hsu or [50:59] Chia who are always saying, "Oh, [51:01] whenever a father thinks of his daughter [51:03] , he feels sorry for her, that he didn't [51:06] give her enough." Look, all of you, [51:08] including Youting, are such [51:10] knowledgeable parents. Why do I feel [51:12] like the parents I come into contact [51:14] with are all quite good? But then, why [51:17] do I look online—because I want to [51:19] understand more—and see so many young [51:21] people reflecting on parent-child [51:23] relationships that are different from [51:25] what I see around me? Sometimes you [51:27] really feel like they're enemies, or [51:30] you're just confused, and I can [51:32] understand that. Take Eileen Chang and [51:34] her mother, for example; oh my, they [51:36] would settle every cent of their money [51:39] clearly. And honestly, let me ask you: [51:42] when your mother says she’s protecting [51:44] her daughter, is it actually a way for [51:47] her to satisfy herself? [51:49] >> Is it that you’ve become her entire [51:51] spiritual world? Is she satisfying her [51:54] own desire for control? Is it because [51:56] the parents' lives are too empty? They [51:58] have to grasp onto something; do you [52:00] know what some parents are like now? [52:02] They complain about their children while [52:04] watching them, thinking, "You have no [52:05] choice, you have to rely on us, right?" [52:07] Aren't we giving you money? But since we [52:10] give you money, it seems we can treat [52:12] you like a show you had to perform as a [52:14] child, always using you as a topic. And [52:16] you still have to listen. Many young [52:19] people are in this kind of relationship [52:21] , thinking, "Once I make my own money, [52:23] I'll cut ties and ignore them, right?"" [52:25] I won't have to listen to them." See, [52:27] with financial independence comes that [52:30] right. It’s so painful to think about, [52:32] hearing parents say, "We’re only doing [52:34] this for your own good." They say such [52:36] piercing words; every month when they [52:38] send money via WeChat, they attach a [52:40] whole essay with it. Yes. [52:42] >> But aren't parents supposed to love [52:44] their children? How did this turn into a [52:47] form of mental torture? [52:48] >> It’s that their spiritual independence [52:51] lacks diversity. It’s that they... [52:53] >> Parents, yes, it’s the parents... [52:56] >> Parents aren't diverse enough. They take [52:59] their own life standards—what they [53:01] believe is perfectly right—and use them [53:03] as a measuring stick, causing resentment [53:06] in their children, which in turn affects [53:08] how those children view society. [53:11] But what’s even worse? Sometimes, [53:13] children are listening to the scolding [53:15] and the criticisms......all while having [53:18] to admit that they are right. Exactly, [53:20] at thirty, you're still asking your [53:22] parents for money. You think to yourself [53:24] , it really is true, I haven't really [53:26] made it, you know? That's the most [53:28] painful part—you can't even say they're [53:30] wrong, can you? [53:31] >> This is a child raised by parents with [53:33] those kinds of values. For me, looking [53:35] at my child now, people always talk [53:37] about how physically exhausting it is to [53:40] raise kids or how hard it is to get [53:42] enough sleep, but the scariest thing [53:44] about parenting is that it forces me to [53:46] confront my greatest flaws when I’m [53:49] completely unprepared—things I didn't [53:51] want to know about myself, or things I [53:53] knew but refused to change. [53:56] >> In the beginning, my husband would often [53:59] say something whenever I got a bit [54:01] impatient with the kids; he’d say, " [54:03] Look, you’re acting just like your [54:05] mother." [54:06] He tells me not to be like her to remind [54:09] me, because I’ve said I didn't want to [54:11] end up like her, but—anyway, just cut [54:13] this part out, my mom won't see this, [54:16] she won't be bothered. [54:18] >> And right in that moment, it’s like he’s [54:21] lit a fuse, and I just explode. [54:23] >> I know there’s a fiery temper inside you [54:26] , um. [54:27] >> I would tell him that I know I have my [54:29] faults. [54:29] >> Why am I so impatient? That’s why I keep [54:32] studying psychology, to find the root [54:34] cause. I know I’m impatient because my [54:36] mother was also a rather impatient [54:38] person, right? But the upside is that it [54:40] makes you very efficient. [54:41] >> Yes, but of course, when it comes to [54:43] children, it’s usually more often a [54:44] negative thing. I know I have this [54:46] impatient side, and I know it’s a major [54:48] , major flaw of mine, but I probably [54:50] just didn't want to—or didn't know how [54:52] to—change it, because changing is [54:54] exhausting, so you just keep it hidden. [54:56] But then the child is right there, [54:58] they’re crying, and they need you. When [55:00] you suddenly run out of ways to handle [55:02] them, they remind me that I’m not [55:05] prepared, and suddenly I get impatient, [55:07] and I’m finished, I have no tricks left [55:10] , and then my true nature—the part I [55:12] least want to see—just comes out. [55:14] >> The reptilian brain takes over. [55:16] >> Yes, it comes out, and once it does, I’m [55:18] reminded again that this is actually [55:20] what your parents gave to you. So every [55:22] time my child reminds me of this, I tell [55:23] myself that I must be prepared before I [55:25] can face them, so I have to practice [55:26] self-discipline every day, I practice [55:28] every day, that is, every... [55:29] >> You shouldn't be studying psychology; [55:31] you should be chanting the Heart Sutra. [55:33] >> Many mothers have told me this. [55:35] >> But I feel that it really has to come [55:37] from within your heart. He really isn't [55:41] yours. When I'm conscious and aware of [55:43] what I'm doing, I'm very careful with my [55:46] word choice. [55:47] When I talk to people, I constantly [55:50] remind myself not to say "my child." No [55:53] , like I said, it’s Iron Man Brothers, [55:55] just Iron Man Brothers, he has a name. [55:57] >> His name, or whatever, try your best, [56:00] you... [56:00] >> Iron Man Brothers says he's a brother. [56:04] >> Wouldn't that mess up the generations? [56:06] >> This is my husband's brother. Right, so [56:09] I try to avoid any sense of ownership. I [56:12] have to be careful with my own phrasing [56:15] . [56:15] >> Wow, that concept is really interesting [56:17] . [56:17] >> Because the words you use eventually [56:19] seep into your subconscious. [56:20] >> Yes, language shapes reality. [56:22] >> Exactly. And another thing is, I chose [56:25] to leave the work environment for seven [56:27] years. I know, I know many people call [56:30] this a sacrifice or whatever, but I [56:32] strictly remind myself: absolutely not. [56:34] This isn't a sacrifice; it's my choice, [56:37] and I'm happy. I ask myself every day, " [56:40] Am I happy?" If I'm not happy, we need [56:42] to change our approach. You can't take [56:44] that resentment out on the child and say [56:46] , "If it weren't for your birth, I [56:48] wouldn't have left this job." I believe [56:50] my mom also quit her nursing job after [56:53] giving birth to me, and I believe she [56:55] was willing, voluntary. Look at that, [56:58] you've replicated your mother. [57:00] >> Don't talk about me like that. [57:01] >> Is this sometimes an inescapable fate? [57:04] >> Let me tell you. We were doing a [57:06] psychology exercise the other day, and [57:08] the teacher said life has 12 suitcases. [57:10] Please think about it. If everyone [57:12] thinks about it, pick a number between [57:14] zero and 18. I picked, I picked six. I [57:16] didn't know what the teacher was [57:17] planning, then they said, "Okay, how did [57:19] six-year-old you feel about trust?" What [57:20] was your definition of a boyfriend? How [57:22] would I know? But this psychology [57:24] student said, "Trust your intuition, [57:25] imagine you're six right now, sitting [57:27] there. What is a boyfriend to you?" And [57:29] then? Marriage and whatever, so I just [57:31] wrote it down. After I finished writing [57:33] , the teacher asked us to pick a [57:34] psychological...Anyway, I'll say this, [57:36] sometimes when I take these classes, I’m [57:38] a bit guarded. I think to myself, I [57:39] don't want to tell you anything too deep [57:41] . I don't want to be analyzed by the [57:43] teacher; I don't want to spill my guts [57:44] because I'm afraid I'll have a breakdown [57:46] . So, I just picked one from inside. I [57:48] feel the safest thing is marriage, [57:50] because I'm doing okay right now, [57:51] haven't gotten divorced, right? I [57:53] thought, "Hey, marriage is going pretty [57:55] well," so I picked "marriage" as my [57:56] topic. I said, "Hello teacher, let's [57:58] analyze marriage." He said, "Zhuting, [58:00] what is your definition of marriage?" I [58:02] said at six years old, my theme for [58:04] marriage was my father, and the teacher [58:06] continued to ask, what decision did you [58:07] make back then? You think the definition [58:10] of a good marriage, for six-year-old me [58:12] , was a housewife at home. And a husband [58:14] outside working hard. [58:16] >> You see, it's a pattern. [58:18] >> Then I started crying. The reason I [58:21] cried was because I thought, as a [58:23] stay-at-home mom, I was an educated [58:26] woman making an independent, [58:28] well-thought-out choice. But it turned [58:31] out no, it was still the influence of my [58:33] mother, you know. I don't know if you [58:36] understand me. I understand, I [58:38] understand so well, you can't escape it [58:40] , there's nowhere to hide. [58:42] >> It's not that I don't like it, I just [58:44] feel... [58:45] >> So, how young people view their parents [58:47] is how they view society, this is just [58:49] ... [58:50] >> It's really... [58:51] >> As you get older, you'll find yourself [58:53] becoming more and more like them. That's [58:55] why I need to... [58:56] >> And only then will you realize that the [58:58] minute your mother is after you, that is [59:00] motherly love. [59:01] >> I understand, but I also know that this [59:04] love can sometimes be a bit heavy. [59:06] >> Hmm. [59:07] >> So the best love is truly the so-called [59:10] ...so my life goal now, hmm... [59:12] >> My life coach told me to set a life goal [59:14] , and my life goal is that in this [59:17] lifetime, I must experience what it [59:19] feels like to give unconditional love. I [59:21] haven't felt it, even toward my husband [59:23] , I have to be honest. [59:25] >> Was your mother's love for you [59:26] conditional? [59:27] >> I don't think it was her fault or [59:29] anything, it was just her instinct. [59:31] >> Then with those two children of yours, [59:33] haven't you felt that you've given them [59:34] unconditional love? Giving it to them. [59:37] >> I'm afraid I have conditions, like I [59:39] said, if you give them tasks, I hope you [59:41] grow up with a definition of a good son [59:43] . I actually told my teacher, there is [59:45] no definition of a good son. But if [59:47] that's the case, who will satisfy you? [59:50] >> Ah, this is precisely that when you give [59:53] unconditionally, for every decision, you [59:56] only ask yourself, are you happy doing [59:59] this right now? Do you want to do this? [60:02] And after you do it, you feel so happy. [60:06] >> There are opportunities to open a [60:08] psychology school. [60:09] >> I am currently working as a life coach, [60:12] really. [60:13] >> He isn't, he isn't from a psychology [60:15] school; I think he could join a [60:16] charitable organization. Really, you and [60:19] this. [60:20] >> Then you mention, well, I actually had a [60:22] friend recently, we were doing mutual [60:24] counseling, and he told me about his [60:26] mother in Taiwan while he’s in the U.S. [60:28] He told me his mom in Taiwan calls him [60:29] every day saying, "I'll use my pension [60:31] to support you, you name your price." [60:33] >> Come back and keep me company. [60:35] >> Fine, just keep me company, you don't [60:37] even have to cook. Hmm. [60:39] >> I just need you to be with me, it’s like [60:41] someone hovering nearby, and it’s [60:43] actually become a huge shadow in my [60:45] friend's heart; he asks, why does my mom [60:47] look down on me so much? Why does she [60:49] think I’m incapable, and why—when I [60:51] clearly have such a great partner in the [60:53] U.S.—does she have to step on that, [60:55] because she feels if I return to Taiwan [60:56] , that partner wouldn't go with me; why [60:58] can't she let me be happy? Since he has [61:01] this inner conflict and he’s struggling [61:03] to move past it, that’s why we need to [61:05] properly... [61:05] >> Because his mother is suffering. [61:09] His first thought, which is natural, is [61:11] of course wondering why his mom looks [61:14] down on him. [61:15] I don’t want to give her the feeling [61:17] that I'm happy. [61:19] On the other hand, for his mother to [61:21] make such demands, if you turn it around [61:24] and think about it, it's as if she’s not [61:26] his mother but a child; when a child [61:29] says, "Please come back, please stay by [61:31] my side," that child is crying out, [61:34] calling for help, and your perspective [61:36] changes. [61:38] We are often quite sad regarding our [61:40] parents 'calls for help, and I even [61:42] underestimate them sometimes. [61:44] >> Or I just turn a deaf ear to them. [61:47] >> I occasionally remind myself to imagine [61:50] my mom’s request for help today—a very [61:53] small request, not asking for one or two [61:55] million. [61:56] " [61:56] >> I haven't had tea in a long time," as [61:59] Cantonese people say, or "no one to have [62:01] tea with me." I’d think, "Oh, I’m so [62:04] busy, I’m tired, it’s finally Sunday and [62:07] I want to rest." So I play a [62:09] psychological game of imagination; I [62:11] imagine that it’s not my mom, but a [62:14] child. [62:17] That little girl, and since you study [62:19] psychology, you’ve known for decades [62:22] that it’s popular to say we all have an [62:24] Adult, Parent, and Child within us. [62:28] We have them, we all have them. Right. [62:32] >> When my mom reaches out for help, I play [62:34] the game of imagining that my mom is now [62:37] a child, a little girl asking for help. [62:40] I need it, I want it; she needs him, she [62:43] wants him. Fine. If she were truly a [62:46] cute little girl, then of course I would [62:49] make time, maybe an hour or two, to keep [62:52] her company, but she’s impaired. [62:55] A mother who has difficulty walking and [62:58] speaks in a muffled way—should I just [63:01] ignore her pleas for help? [63:02] >> I think there’s a reason for this, as [63:04] I’ve talked to many people, and it’s [63:06] that everyone is very afraid of [63:08] responding. So, regarding what you just [63:10] said about turning a deaf ear, let me [63:12] tell a short story; I used to call my [63:13] son to take a bath all the time. I mean [63:15] , he was only five years old at that [63:18] time, just five years old. I would call [63:20] him every day, and I’d ask, "Why do you [63:22] just keep playing whenever I call you?" [63:23] He might be playing like this, and he [63:25] just turns a deaf ear. I—I would get [63:27] angry. I said, "You should respond to me [63:29] , you should respond to me by saying,' [63:31] Mom, can I have ten more minutes to [63:32] finish playing? '""You don't have to go [63:34] take a bath right away, but you can't [63:35] just turn a deaf ear, because I feel [63:37] it's very disrespectful to others." Then [63:38] , he said something to me, he said, " [63:41] Mom, I heard you.""But if I respond to [63:43] you, I feel like I have to do it [63:45] immediately, and I feel that pressure." [63:47] "I can't wait, I feel that as soon as I [63:48] say I heard you telling me to take a [63:50] bath..." He had—he had a pressure; a [63:52] five-year-old child actually told me [63:54] that. He didn't say it like that, he [63:56] said, "I feel like I have to do it right [63:58] away. I can't tell you I'll take a bath [64:00] in ten minutes because I think you'll [64:01] still be mad, I think you'll still be [64:03] mad." [64:03] >> Mm. [64:04] >> So, aren't there many things inside this [64:06] ? First, this is the mother's standard; [64:08] this is exactly what I said earlier—you [64:10] didn't give him the space to decide when [64:12] to respond to you or when to do what you [64:14] asked. He thinks, "I have to do it right [64:15] now, but I don't want to. What should I [64:17] do?""I have no choice but to turn a deaf [64:19] ear." Second, mothers sometimes forget [64:21] about boundaries. We tend to have no [64:23] boundaries with those close to us. I [64:25] tried it once, I cried once and he came [64:27] back to eat with me, so I cried twice. [64:29] He would come back. People are all like [64:32] this, because it's only natural. Babies [64:34] are the same; why do they cry? Crying [64:36] gets a response. Everyone knows the [64:39] tools to make this person respond. A [64:41] girlfriend knows how to make her [64:43] boyfriend turn back, right? She’ll call [64:45] him, but she hasn't tried it on her son [64:47] . [64:47] >> Right. I [64:49] >> It’s like an endless void, and I feel [64:51] like I’m about to get sucked in. And [64:53] then I get scared. Because I really like [64:56] my current pace of life, and I don't [64:58] want to get pulled in. I love you very [65:00] much, Mom, I’ll visit ten times, but I [65:02] don’t want to visit a hundred. [65:03] >> Hmm. [65:04] >> But I can’t say it, because if I do, I’m [65:06] not smiling anymore. [65:07] >> Hmm. [65:08] >> Right? [65:09] >> Yes. [65:10] >> So it’s just so conflicted in the middle [65:12] . [65:12] >> Hey, Professor Xu, what do you think [65:14] about this resentment between parents [65:16] and children? Is it normal? [65:18] >> The normal kind doesn't get expressed. [65:21] >> It’s just an unspoken, mutual resentment [65:23] that everyone knows is there. Maybe we [65:26] shouldn't use the word "resentment." [65:30] >> But there are bound to be disagreements [65:32] ; you can't expect your child to think [65:34] exactly like you. [65:37] Uh, you can totally imagine that my [65:39] children don't agree with many of the [65:42] things we do. [65:43] >> They don't approve of them. But they [65:45] don't confront me about it. Things like [65:48] that, but if you strictly escalate it to [65:50] whether there's resentment, it’s hard to [65:53] say. [65:54] Watching Youting study psychology [65:56] reminds me of a book I flipped through [65:59] last night by D.T. Suzuki, that Japanese [66:02] Zen figure, about Zen and psychoanalysis [66:04] . [66:05] He tells some stories about Chinese Zen [66:08] ; maybe because he's Japanese, his [66:10] translation is different—not exactly [66:13] what I've seen—he mentions Master [66:15] Zhaozhou. [66:18] He says there was a housewife who said, [66:20] "My husband doesn't care for the home, [66:23] my son is a mess, I work hard on chores [66:26] for them, and they don't give me any [66:28] praise or validation. [66:31] What should I do?" Master Zhaozhou said [66:34] , "Let them continue to do what they do [66:37] , and you continue to do what you do." [66:40] That sounds like it makes no sense at [66:42] all. A famous quote from Master Zhaozhou [66:45] is, "I will go to hell before any of you [66:48] ." His disciples asked, "Why?" He said, [66:51] "If I don't go to hell before you, how [66:54] can I wait there to save you?" [66:56] What does this show us? [66:59] In today’s rights-based society, we talk [67:02] about things like gender equality and [67:04] racial rights. [67:06] But actually, above all these rights, [67:09] there is a highest human value and moral [67:12] standard set long ago, and I highly [67:14] doubt how many people have ever truly [67:17] achieved it. For example, I have a very [67:20] successful big boss around me. I think [67:22] since he’s made so much money, his life [67:24] experience must be worth learning from. [67:26] But sometimes, when I complain to him [67:28] about someone, I say, "Oh, I’ve had such [67:30] bad luck with petty people in my life, I [67:32] keep running into them, right? Right?" [67:35] >> He asked me, "Why? I never think that [67:38] way. I always feel that if someone has [67:40] deceived me, there must be something [67:43] wrong with me.""How could I have let [67:45] them think they could get away with [67:47] deceiving me?" And he also loves [67:49] collecting antiques. He says if someone [67:52] sells him a fake, he examines himself, [67:55] thinking, "Is my level really that low? [67:57] ""Is my reputation that bad?""How could [68:01] this expert possibly think that I [68:02] wouldn't be able to spot this fake?" So [68:05] he asks, fundamentally, it's not others [68:08] ' fault; it's your own fault. When he [68:10] said this, I really remembered a quote [68:12] from the Platform Sutra of the Sixth [68:13] Patriarch: "If you are a true [68:15] practitioner, you will not see the [68:16] faults of the world," right? This, this [68:18] "They are wrong, I am not, if I am wrong [68:20] , it’s my own fault," means that if you [68:22] are truly a practitioner, there are no [68:24] bad people; all problems are your own [68:25] problems. Why would bad people seek you [68:28] out? You should examine why you attract [68:30] bad people instead of attracting good [68:32] people, you know? I said this is the [68:34] value system of Guanyin Bodhisattva: "I [68:36] can be of service to you all." Like you [68:38] were saying, and listening, what you [68:39] just said implies that you are the one [68:41] who is correct. You are always right, [68:43] but in my view, how can you control [68:45] yourself? You are also a mortal, you are [68:47] also selfish, you also have desires that [68:49] need to be met, and you also have a hot [68:51] temper. [68:51] >> So what you need to think about is not [68:53] for others, but—okay—actually, it is for [68:55] yourself. It’s like something my husband [68:57] , Iron Man, said, which I think is [68:58] brilliant. He said that when a child is [69:00] throwing a tantrum, that is when you [69:01] show your parenting, that is when you [69:03] demonstrate your upbringing. When the [69:05] child is behaving well, parents… [69:07] >> Your home is like a philosophy classroom [69:09] . You have to be, you have to be [69:11] impressive. So I feel very positive [69:13] about it, thinking that everything I’ve [69:15] learned is precisely for dealing with [69:17] this moment—how I am going to resolve [69:19] this, which is what I just called " [69:21] passing the test." [69:22] >> Isn't that my practice finally being put [69:24] to use? I feel excited, I’m not—I’m not [69:27] —I don't feel it’s difficult to apply it [69:30] . [69:30] >> My money spent on therapy wasn’t wasted [69:33] . [69:33] >> I just align myself, listening to what [69:36] the teacher says, what Mom says, and I [69:38] keep my temper calm; once it's done, [69:41] she's happy, and you're happy for [69:43] yourself. Any low point or any setback [69:46] is just an opportunity for you to learn [69:49] and grow. Right. [69:51] >> What's more, every shortcoming has two [69:54] sides; I was watching Serena Williams, [69:57] or rather, her tennis coach. [70:00] >> She plays tennis. [70:02] >> Her coach was being interviewed, and the [70:05] first thing he said was that being her [70:07] coach is also a lesson in life. He said [70:10] that any player's shortcoming is [70:12] actually their strength. This champion [70:15] coach, who has won so many medals, said [70:17] he was a very withdrawn person when he [70:20] was a child. He was afraid of crowds. So [70:23] , he would always hide behind others and [70:25] was treated by countless teachers as a [70:27] student with special needs, asking, " [70:28] Why are you so afraid of people?" He [70:30] said, but what opportunity did that give [70:33] him? Because he was afraid, he hid [70:34] behind the crowd, so he was always [70:36] watching. He didn't speak, he just [70:38] watched, so he said his ability lies in [70:40] being able to read everyone's [70:42] micro-expressions. It's just because [70:44] I've been standing on the sidelines [70:45] watching others since I was little. [70:47] >> Oh. [70:48] >> Because he had such a big shortcoming as [70:51] a child, which was even considered a [70:53] disorder, but because he learned to [70:56] observe people, he doesn't need his [70:58] players to tell him "I'm not in a good [71:00] mood today" or "I lack confidence in [71:03] this stance"; he says he can see it all [71:05] on the court from their [71:07] micro-expressions. [71:09] >> Yes, that's me too. Because I was more [71:12] insecure as a child, I became very [71:14] attentive to reading other people's [71:16] faces. That's why I became a host. Right [71:19] ? [71:19] >> It really is all about watching other [71:21] people's reactions. So that proves that [71:24] a shortcoming is a strength, a [71:26] shortcoming is... [71:27] >> It's true, I told you, that boss Ma Yin [71:29] from Ananya we met last time said the [71:31] same thing. How come I've noticed all [71:34] successful people say this? That is, he [71:36] said, "Look, sometimes clients give me a [71:38] lot of feedback; at first, I also felt [71:40] very unhappy, right?" Of course, nobody [71:42] likes to hear that. "But," he said, "I [71:44] gradually realized something later." He [71:46] felt that reading the residents ' [71:48] opinions was a form of spiritual [71:49] practice, and I have to do this homework [71:51] every day; you know, I don't get upset [71:53] by it anymore. I'm just saying, one day [71:56] your answer will be what? It's not your [71:59] husband who is the "Iron Man," it's you [72:01] who are the "Iron Man." You know, to be [72:03] able to do all this, the prerequisite is [72:06] that you turn yourself into a better, [72:08] higher-quality person. My goodness, I [72:11] was just saying how much you must have [72:13] suffered over these seven years to [72:15] surpass yourself like this. Oh my, I [72:16] always feel like you don't realize how [72:18] much he cares about his family. [72:20] >> In that cold Northern Europe. [72:22] >> Yeah, the Ironman competition really [72:23] tortured you, didn't it? [72:24] >> Alright then. Why all these psychology [72:26] lessons and such? Do you feel like [72:28] you're losing it? [72:29] >> Because people are destined to be lonely [72:31] . [72:31] >> Look, look at the show. [72:33] >> This is just too philosophical. [72:35] >> Right? [72:36] >> Did you get that? [72:38] >> I’m actually quite touched; if I heard [72:41] you correctly, you said that sometimes [72:43] your children point out your own [72:45] shortcomings. [72:48] I, I have a very vivid memory of a [72:51] similar scene. [72:53] It was many years ago, my daughter, and [72:55] I—I took her to the bookstore—well, we [72:58] just went to the bookstore together. I [73:01] have to learn from you, not constantly [73:03] talk about "my child," right? And don't [73:06] say "I took my child." [73:09] >> It wasn't really me taking her; my wife [73:11] hasn't done a show with you. [73:15] Right, she and I appeared at the [73:17] bookstore together, and of course, I [73:20] paid in the end, okay. [73:22] So, we were looking at books, with many [73:25] books on the table. [73:27] Then I told my daughter to pick a book, [73:30] to see if there were any good ones. [73:32] I asked, "What book do you think I [73:34] should read?" [73:36] My daughter looked for a moment, picked [73:38] up a book, and placed it in front of me [73:41] . I looked at the cover title in English [73:43] ; translated into Chinese, it meant: " [73:46] If you love your children, be good to [73:48] their mother." Oh, I have a very deep [73:51] impression of that. [73:52] >> How old was she? [73:54] >> Looking back, she was probably about [73:56] nine or ten. [73:57] >> Clearly, there's a tyrant at home. [74:00] >> No, the child is just very profound. Or [74:03] is the home life very dark? [74:05] >> I’m a bit more stubborn, I just thought [74:08] I was treating her... [74:10] ... [74:10] >> not well enough, even though I was [74:13] trying. From my daughter's perspective, [74:15] I wasn't being good enough to her mother [74:17] . But my daughter reminded me through [74:20] that book. Of course, truthfully, I felt [74:22] ashamed, seeing it through my daughter's [74:25] eyes. [74:25] >> Is your daughter a writer? [74:27] >> What? [74:28] >> Is she studying writing? [74:30] >> Yeah. Oh right, she likes to write. [74:34] Yeah, just wait, one day she’ll come out [74:37] with a novel, "My Father and Mother." [74:42] >> I’ve always felt that the college [74:44] entrance exam topics should include "My [74:46] Father and Mother." [74:48] >> Right. [74:49] >> Just imagine how many great essays would [74:51] emerge across the country. [74:53] >> I fear nothing on heaven or earth, [74:55] except when my kids ask, "Where did this [74:58] come from?""Where did this come from?" [75:00] >> I made it up. [75:02] >> That is our conclusion for today, isn't [75:05] it? [75:07] >> Jidong said I must retell this story [75:10] I've shared before. [75:13] I've never read my daughter's—well, not [75:16] my daughter, someone else's daughter, [75:19] okay—her novels. [75:21] Why, why is that? She wrote her first [75:25] published piece. I was happy, of course [75:27] , and read it in English. The first [75:30] paragraph started, "On a cold winter [75:32] night, my father quietly packed his bags [75:35] ..." [75:35] >> Quietly packed. " [75:37] >> Then he left home." Oh, I was terrified [75:40] . I didn't know what the plot was. [75:42] That's what I mean—children will remind [75:43] you of things when you're least prepared [75:45] . You just have to read it. That's how [75:47] it is. So I never dare to look. Jidong [75:50] is right, waiting for them to write [75:52] about "My Father and Mother" is truly a [75:54] terrifying thing. My wife is a writer, [75:57] too. I often say I haven't read a single [76:00] one of her essays, even though her two [76:02] books moved thousands of young literary [76:05] fans. [76:05] >> My husband? [76:07] >> No, I just happened to open the table of [76:10] contents. [76:12] One of the titles was "My Husband and [76:15] His Lover." [76:17] Actually, she knew everything all along [76:20] . [76:20] >> Those were essays. I asked her, "Why [76:23] would you write that?" And she wrote [76:26] about... [76:26] >> So and so. [76:27] >> I guess it was the daughter. [76:29] >> Right, so I didn't dare to read it. [76:32] >> I was already overthinking it, so on top [76:34] of fearing nothing, I also fear having a [76:36] writer in the family. [76:37] >> That's also true. [76:38] >> Exactly. See, in the end, every problem [76:42] is a psychological one. [76:45] Is it "peace of mind leads to reason" or [76:47] "reason leads to peace of mind"? Every [76:50] person's choice deserves respect. [76:53] >> Right? Every family, every parent and [76:56] child, has their own arrangements. But [76:59] if you feel anxious, just ask yourself [77:01] if your heart is at peace. [77:03] >> Look at Youting, she even went to find a [77:05] psychologist—or rather, she went to [77:06] study psychology. [77:07] >> Studied psychology. And I think Youting [77:10] had a classic line: regardless of [77:12] whether your heart is at peace, we must [77:14] realize that we are ultimately alone. [77:16] >> No matter who relies on whom. [77:18] >> In the end, everyone is on their own. [77:20] >> So you have to prepare yourself to be [77:22] independent. [77:23] >> I think there is too much emphasis on [77:25] independence these days. Many people use [77:28] "independence"—like "I don't rely on [77:30] others"—as a badge of honor, as if it's [77:33] a value that's so worthy of praise. [77:37] I think we should try to balance that [77:40] out. [77:40] >> Right, right, right. I really, I mean, [77:43] many people need to realize that when [77:45] you say "I did it all on my own," nobody [77:48] actually becomes who they are today [77:50] solely by themselves, right? Even a, [77:52] this, this, what is it, a police officer [77:54] , a traffic cop, you relied on them so [77:56] you didn't get into a car accident and [77:58] made it to this day. [77:59] >> The auxiliary officer nearby. [78:01] >> Exactly, you're right, who can truly [78:03] rely on no one? [78:05] >> But, while we must rely on one another, [78:07] we also need to realize that we are [78:09] ultimately destined to be alone. [78:12] >> Don't you think? Oh, thank you. You've [78:15] shared such valuable wisdom with us, you [78:17] really have.