Tony Schwartz Tells Google Staff Energy Renewal Beats Longer Hours
Talks at Google
Investing extra hours fails to solve rising workplace demand because time is finite, requiring workers to alternate 90-minute focus sprints with disciplined recovery rituals to expand biological capacity.
Human biological capacity naturally peaks at age 30 and deteriorates without proactive intervention, creating a growing capacity deficit as career and life demands escalate. (4:06)
Time is an unyielding, finite resource of 168 hours per week, meaning sustainable high performance requires managing renewable energy rather than investing more time. (6:51)
Human physiology operates on 90- to 120-minute ultradian cycles during the day; failing to take intermittent recovery breaks triggers toxic fight-or-flight hormones that shut down the prefrontal cortex. (42:49)
Elite performers treat rest as a trained discipline, exemplified by top-200 tennis players whose 20-to-30-second between-point rituals systematically lower their heart rates by roughly one beat per second. (58:24)
Detailed notes
## Background
Published by the Talks at Google channel on YouTube on May 7, 2008, this presentation features Tony Schwartz speaking at Google's Mountain View headquarters as part of the Leading@Google speaker series. The session covers how escalating workplace demands outpace human capacity and outlines Schwartz's framework for systematically expanding and renewing physical, emotional, mental, and spiritual energy rather than relying solely on the finite resource of time.
## TL;DR
Tony Schwartz argues that attempting to meet relentlessly rising workplace demands by investing more time is biologically unsustainable, requiring professionals to shift their focus to managing renewable energy. Human performance rests upon four interconnected dimensions: physical capacity, emotional quality, mental focus, and spiritual purpose. Schwartz demonstrates that modern workers habitually trap themselves in high-stress survival states and chronic distraction, running flat-out until burning out. Drawing lessons from the recovery rituals of elite athletes and ultradian biological rhythms, he urges knowledge workers to operate like sprinters by alternating 90- to 120-minute intervals of deep focus with intentional renewal breaks.
## Atmosphere & style
The presentation is brisk, candid, and intellectually sharp, blending rigorous physiological data with playful, self-deprecating humor. Schwartz commands the stage with restless physical energy, playfully chiding the tech-centric audience about their multi-tasking illusions, BlackBerry addictions, and cultural aversion to genuine rest. The room shifts from nervous chuckles during an eye-opening 16-question energy audit to contemplative quiet as attendees confront their collective depletion, ultimately closing on an empowering and pragmatic call to build sustainable daily rituals.
## Bulletin
- [04:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=246s) Human biological capacity naturally peaks at age 30 and deteriorates without proactive intervention, creating a growing capacity deficit as career and life demands escalate.
- [06:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=411s) Time is an unyielding, finite resource of 168 hours per week, meaning sustainable high performance requires managing renewable energy rather than investing more time.
- [42:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=2569s) Human physiology operates on 90- to 120-minute ultradian cycles during the day; failing to take intermittent recovery breaks triggers toxic fight-or-flight hormones that shut down the prefrontal cortex.
- [58:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=3504s) Elite performers treat rest as a trained discipline, exemplified by top-200 tennis players whose 20-to-30-second between-point rituals systematically lower their heart rates by roughly one beat per second.
## Key takeaways
- [01:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=111s) Leadership capability is grounded in personal character and self-development, beginning with the physical body and energetic capacity.
- [04:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=246s) Natural physical capacity peaks at age 30, after which the human body naturally loses one-half pound of lean muscle per year unless actively countered.
- [09:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=546s) While competency reflects skills and knowledge, capacity serves as the foundational energy reservoir required to activate those competencies under pressure.
- [11:17](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=677s) Human energy operates across four interconnected tiers: physical quantity, emotional quality, mental focus, and spiritual purpose.
- [14:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=843s) Fragmented attention carries severe cognitive penalties, as entering demanding mental tasks requires a three-to-eight-minute warmup phase that frequent interruptions continuously abort.
- [16:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=1005s) The energy of the human spirit serves as the foundational 'Why' that aligns daily actions with personal core values and fuels resilience across the other three energy tiers.
- [28:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=1710s) Operating in the high-negative 'Survival Zone' floods the body with adrenaline and cortisol, shifting blood away from the prefrontal cortex and crippling analytical thinking.
- [32:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=1928s) Chronic exposure to prolonged cortisol turns it toxic, contributing to major illnesses while emotional stress spreads contagiously to colleagues and teams.
- [35:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=2113s) Corporate culture systematically undervalues the 'Recovery Zone', resulting in workers perpetually bouncing between high performance and reactive survival until collapsing into burnout.
- [38:28](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=2308s) Like an Indianapolis 500 race, sustaining peak performance depends on executing disciplined, rapid recovery pit stops rather than running continuously flat-out.
- [42:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=2569s) Waking performance is governed by ultradian cycles (the Basic Rest-Activity Cycle), requiring deliberate disengagement every 90 to 120 minutes rather than masking dips with stimulants.
- [47:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=2831s) Workers must transition from an endless marathon mindset to that of a sprinter, expending maximum energy across defined intervals bounded by intentional renewal.
- [50:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=3011s) Sustainable behavioral change relies on establishing automatic positive rituals with precise scheduling and low friction, rather than counting on finite prefrontal willpower.
- [55:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=3311s) Dedicating the first 60 to 90 minutes of the workday to high-leverage priorities shields cognitive focus from the reactive trap of incoming email.
- [58:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=3504s) World-class tennis players use structured physical routines between points—turning away, switching hands, adjusting strings, and walking upright—to drop heart rates by 20 to 30 beats before the next serve.
- [59:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=3572s) Building recovery intervals throughout the morning significantly blunts the biological afternoon circadian slump, stabilizing energy across the entire day.
## Detailed walkthrough
### [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=0s) Introduction by Evan Wittenberg
Evan Wittenberg from Google University’s leadership development and people management group welcomes the audience to the Leading@Google speaker series. He introduces Tony Schwartz, the founder, president, and CEO of The Energy Project, an organization centered on managing energy rather than time to optimize performance at work, at home, and in life. Wittenberg recounts Schwartz's career trajectory, beginning in journalism as a reporter for *The New York Times*, an associate editor at *Newsweek*, a staff writer for *New York* and *Esquire* magazines, and a columnist for *Fast Company*. Wittenberg also points out a humorous credential from his past: co-authoring the number-one international bestseller *The Art of the Deal* with Donald Trump, noting that audience members can ask him later for his opinions on Trump. He highlights Schwartz's book *What Really Matters: Searching for Wisdom in America* and the core philosophy of his talk—achieving greater effectiveness through energy management.
Wittenberg notes that Google has already piloted a two-day version of Schwartz's course, asking participants in the room to raise their hands. Before yielding the floor, Wittenberg issues a specific ground rule requested by Schwartz based on his book *The Power of Full Engagement*: attendees must close their laptops unless actively taking notes. He explains that the human brain cannot multitask, despite the illusions people maintain, and expresses hope that the presentation will keep everyone engaged enough to ignore their laptops and BlackBerry devices until the closing Q&A session.
[01:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=111s) The Foundation of Leadership and Self-Development
Tony Schwartz takes the stage and traces the origin of his work to a personal quest that began during his teenage years. While his peers pursued conventional teenage activities, Schwartz found himself consumed by questions about what made a meaningful life, driven by a desire to become a happier, more fulfilled person while growing up in what he describes as a difficult New York Jewish family. Over decades, that introspective search expanded into investigating human potential: what allows an individual to continuously develop a richer, deeper version of themselves over a lifetime.
Schwartz acknowledges that while his work is ostensibly marketed to help corporate organizations enhance productivity and assist individuals in becoming better leaders, its actual core is personal development. He draws a firm line connecting character and leadership:
> “But you can't be a great leader if you're not a great human being.”
He explains that true leadership begins with working on oneself. Although the talk focuses heavily on the physical realm—because everything fundamentally starts with the body—he notes that this is merely the base of a much broader framework that governs a person's capacity to show up fully in every area of life.
[04:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=246s) The Widening Gap Between Demand and Capacity
Schwartz explains that the primary reason organizations invite him to consult is an escalating structural crisis: the divergence between demand and capacity. From birth, a human being faces relatively little external demand, though children voice plenty of demands of their own. Over time, life's demands steadily increase in modern society, continuing on an upward trajectory until death. Human capacity, on the other hand, follows a natural physiological arc. In the absence of conscious and deliberate personal intervention, natural physical capacity increases until it reaches a biological peak.
Schwartz asks the Google audience to guess the age at which that natural capacity peaks. When an audience member shouts out forty-five, Schwartz corrects him: natural capacity peaks at age thirty. He jokes that for the relatively young Google demographic, thirty might still lie in the future, but warns that biological realities arrive regardless. After thirty, physiological capacity steadily deteriorates without active counter-measures.
```mermaid
flowchart LR
accTitle: Demand versus Capacity Over a Lifespan
accDescr: Diagram illustrating the widening gap as demand steadily climbs while natural capacity peaks at age 30 and declines.
subgraph S1["Demand Trajectory"]
D1["Birth: Low Demand"] --> D2["Adulthood: High Demand"] --> D3["Modern Work: Relentlessly Rising"]
end
D3 -.->|"Creates Growing Deficit"| GAP["The Capacity Gap<br>(Houston, we have a problem)"]
C3 -.->|"Fails to Keep Pace"| GAP
```
Schwartz surveys the room with three targeted questions that reveal the core dilemma:
- When asked if the demands over the past two to three years were the highest in their lives, the audience overwhelmingly agrees.
- When asked if anyone expects their workload and life demands to decrease over the coming year after fighting so hard to reach Google, the audience remains skeptical.
- When asked how many people believe their internal capacity will naturally rise to keep pace with that escalating demand, virtually no hands go up.
Summing up the dilemma, Schwartz quipped, “Houston, we got a problem.”
- From age 30 onward, the human body naturally loses one-half pound of lean muscle mass every single year without proactive intervention.
[06:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=411s) Time vs. Energy as Resources
To survive mounting workloads, most professionals instinctively rely on a single primary lever: time. When demand spikes, people throw more hours at the problem. Schwartz observes that even forward-thinking, perk-rich companies like Google evaluate employees to a significant degree based on perceived time investment and visibility. However, this strategy quickly hits a hard biological ceiling.
Schwartz jokingly asks whether anyone in the room would like advice on what to do with their abundant free hours. With personal schedules already pushed to the brink, time proves to be an entirely finite currency. A week contains exactly 168 hours, and none can be manufactured or recovered once spent. Schwartz stresses that time is external and moves past like a train, disappearing forever. Because no extra hours exist, the only sustainable way to meet expanding demand in an increasingly complex world is to get more accomplished in less time. Doing so requires shifting focus to an internal, renewable resource: human energy. Unlike time, energy can be systematically expanded and regularly renewed.
[09:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=546s) Redefining Energy and Capacity vs. Competency
Addressing corporate skepticism toward the word "energy," Schwartz points out that while minutes and hours are easily measured on a spreadsheet, energy is often viewed as subjective and soft. He grounds his framework in the basic physics definition:
> “Energy is the capacity to do work.”
If energy equates to capacity, building a person's energy reservoir directly expands their capacity to handle work. Schwartz distinguishes between competency and capacity. Googlers are hired because of world-class intelligence, skills, and competencies, yet competency remains useless without the underlying capacity to fuel it. Capacity provides the energetic foundation that activates skills and talent. When individuals try to run on empty—suffering from sleep deprivation, poor nutrition, emotional turmoil, fractured concentration, or depleted passion—their abilities falter under pressure. Just as a vehicle requires a fuel source to run, humans require energy systems, leading Schwartz into the distinct dimensions of energy that power high performance.
[11:17](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=677s) The Foundation of Physical Energy and Daytime Renewal
Tony Schwartz explains that unlike machines, which rely on a single energy source, human beings operate on a complex, multidimensional system of four distinct energy sources: physical, emotional, mental, and spiritual. Each source is necessary, none is sufficient on its own, and they deeply influence one another. While people can get by utilizing only one or two dimensions, operating at one's personal best requires all four. Schwartz notes that the physical dimension serves as the foundational base upon which all other capacities rest, arguing: “If you don't have sufficient physical energy, is it going to influence your focus of attention?” In workplace and school environments alike, this physical foundation is routinely discounted and neglected unless someone happens to be competing on a varsity sports team.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: The Four Dimensions of Human Energy
accDescr: Diagram showing the four multidimensional human energy sources arranged from the foundational physical layer up to spirit.
subgraph Spirit["Spiritual Capacity (Purpose)"]
S["The 'Why': Alignment of values and life purpose"]
end
subgraph Mental["Mental Capacity (Focus)"]
M["Focus of attention and absorption on one task"]
end
subgraph Emotional["Emotional Capacity (Quality)"]
E["Quality of energy and emotional state under pressure"]
end
subgraph Physical["Physical Capacity (Quantity)"]
P1["Nutrition: Sustaining glucose"]
P2["Fitness: Transporting oxygen"]
P3["Sleep: Deep nocturnal rest"]
P4["Renewal: Daytime recovery rhythms"]
end
Schwartz breaks physical capacity down into four primary elements: nutrition, fitness, sleep, and daytime renewal. Nutrition governs how the body sustains and moves glucose, while fitness dictates how efficiently oxygen is transported through the system. Sleep requires both sufficient hours and adequate depth. However, the most overlooked component is daytime renewal—intermittent recovery between expenditures of energy. Human physiology is not designed to function linearly like an engine; it is biologically wired to sleep twice, requiring a longer period at night and a short dip in the afternoon. Schwartz stresses that sustainable performance demands moving rhythmically between expending energy and renewing it throughout the day.
- **Nutrition:** The capacity to stabilize and manage blood glucose levels consistently.
- **Fitness:** Cardiovascular health and strength that govern oxygen transportation throughout the body.
- **Sleep:** Deep, restorative nocturnal sleep lasting seven to eight hours.
- **Daytime Recovery:** Honoring natural ultradian rhythms through brief, intermittent renewal breaks rather than working continuously without pausing.
---
[14:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=843s) Emotional Quality, Mental Focus, and the High Cost of Distraction
Moving above the physical base, Schwartz introduces emotional energy—the quality of energy—which is defined by how a person feels. How people feel profoundly impacts their leadership, performance, and collaboration, with specific emotional states directly fueling sustainable high performance. He then addresses mental energy, which represents the focus of energy. Joking with the audience about the event host Evan’s earlier plea for attendees to shut their laptops and put away their BlackBerrys, Schwartz teases that seeing people distracted makes him feel unloved. On a serious note, he emphasizes that human beings produce their deepest and most effective work when focusing on one thing at a time, a truth recognized for millennia by contemplative traditions.
Schwartz points out that modern technology and corporate habits have decimated single-task focus. While jokingly pointing the finger at Google for creating countless opportunities to fracture human attention, he emphasizes that chronic distraction exacts an extraordinary toll on both productivity and depth of thought. He compares entering a demanding mental task to going for a run: during the first two to five minutes of a run, muscles feel tight, breathing is labored, and rhythm has not yet kicked in. Mental tasks follow the exact same ramp-up curve, requiring three to eight minutes before the mind slips into genuine absorption. When workers constantly interrupt themselves, they perpetually abort this warmup phase. In modern American corporate culture, people average only eleven minutes on a single task before pivoting, and during those brief eleven minutes, they break their own focus every three minutes.
> “The work we do around this dimension and the importance of it is that for thousands of years it has been understood that we do our most effective work when we focus on one thing at a time.” — Tony Schwartz
---
[16:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=1005s) The Energy of the Human Spirit and the Power of "Why"
The fourth dimension, which Schwartz describes as sounding the softest but often proving the most potent, is the energy of the human spirit. This spiritual capacity is not defined dogmatically; rather, it represents the energy derived from a clear sense of purpose and an authentic alignment between what a person claims to value and how they actually conduct their daily life. The closer that alignment is, the richer the reservoir of energy available. Schwartz terms this dimension the fundamental "Why" behind human activity, contrasting it with the physical, emotional, and mental dimensions, which serve as the tactical "Hows."
When an individual's sense of purpose is firmly anchored, it acts as a catalytic force multiplying the other three tiers of energy. Schwartz explains that tapping into authentic personal purpose directly enhances emotional resilience, cognitive focus, and physical endurance under stress. If all four energy sources are operational, an individual possesses the capacity to fire on all cylinders. He then challenges the room to consider how many people actually have these four sources dialed in and invites them to take a pencil and test their habits directly through a research-backed diagnostic.
> “In fact, this energy drives, this is the 'Why,' the others of the 'Hows.' This 'Why' energy drives your behavior at all the other level.” — Tony Schwartz
---
[17:47](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=1067s) The 16-Question Energy Audit
Schwartz guides the audience through a self-administered energy audit drawn from the research database hosted on his company's website, The Energy Project. He instructs everyone to place a check mark next to every item where their honest answer is "yes." In this diagnostic, every affirmative answer flags an energy deficit or poor renewal habit across the physical, emotional, mental, or spiritual dimensions:
| # | Diagnostic Statement | Primary Dimension |
|:---|:---|:---|
| 1 | I don't regularly get at least 7–8 hours of sleep, and I often wake up feeling tired. | Physical (Sleep) |
| 2 | I frequently skip breakfast or settle for something that isn't particularly healthy. | Physical (Nutrition) |
| 3 | I don't work out enough (at least 3x/week cardio and at least 1x/week strength training). | Physical (Fitness) |
| 4 | I don't take regular daytime breaks to renew, and often eat lunch at my desk (if at all). | Physical (Renewal) |
| 5 | I frequently feel irritable, impatient, or anxious at work, especially when demand is high. | Emotional |
| 6 | I don't spend enough time with family/loved ones, and when with them, I'm not really present. | Emotional / Spirit |
| 7 | I take too little time in my life for the activities that I most deeply enjoy. | Emotional |
| 8 | I rarely stop to express appreciation to others or to celebrate accomplishments and blessings. | Emotional |
| 9 | I have difficulty focusing on one thing at a time and am easily distracted, especially by email. | Mental |
| 10 | I spend much of my time reacting to immediate demands rather than high-leverage activities. | Mental |
| 11 | I don't take enough time for reflection, strategizing, or thinking creatively. | Mental |
| 12 | I work evenings and/or weekends, and rarely take a vacation truly free of work. | Mental / Renewal |
| 13 | I spend too little time at work doing what I do best and enjoy most. | Spirit |
| 14 | Significant gaps exist between what I say is important in life and how I actually live. | Spirit |
| 15 | My work decisions are influenced more by external demands than by my own purpose. | Spirit |
| 16 | I don't invest enough positive time and energy in making a positive difference in the world. | Spirit |
As Schwartz reads through the statements, he quips that statement number nine—struggling with distraction and email—is an automatic "yes" for virtually every person in the room. He demands rigorous honesty on strict criteria, such as requiring both regular cardio and regular strength training to avoid checking statement three, and both expressing gratitude and celebrating wins to avoid checking statement eight.
---
[21:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=1281s) The Capacity Deficit: Numbness and Rationalization
As attendees finish totaling their checks, groans ripple through the audience, prompting one participant to call out that people are "cursing." Schwartz conducts a quick show of hands, asking how many checked eight or more statements. A sea of hands goes up across the auditorium. He remarks with dark humor that the good news is everyone has company, but the bad news is that having company means the entire group is deeply depleted. He then asks how many marked twelve or more, and hands remain raised. When he asks if anyone is happy with their score, one attendee mentions scoring five, which Schwartz acknowledges as extraordinarily low for corporate audiences, though even five affirmative marks represent significant compromises.
Schwartz puts the results into perspective: checking eight items implies that approximately 50 percent of an individual's potential human capacity is currently unavailable. This pervasive deficit exists because society takes human capacity entirely for granted, operating under the flawed assumption that when external demands escalate, personal capacity will miraculously expand on its own to meet them. Instead, unmanaged demand takes an aggressive physical, emotional, and spiritual toll, leaving professionals psychologically numbed to how compromised they truly are. Schwartz notes that while everyone has dozens of rationalizations explaining why they cannot prioritize these basic behaviors, the items on the audit are obvious fundamentals of a functioning life.
> “If you have eight 'yes' answers, think of it as 50 percent of the potential capacity available to you that is currently available to you.” — Tony Schwartz
[23:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=1407s) Confronting the Reality: The Energy Audit and the Four Quadrants
Tony Schwartz acknowledges that once people become conscious of habits that do not serve them, the instinctive human reaction is to make excuses. People say to themselves: “I am working really long hours. I got a long commute. I got obligations with my family. I've got other things I'd like to do. I can't do all these things, so get real.” But failing to address these habits takes an undeniable toll on both professional and personal lives. To help the audience confront these issues with complete honesty, Schwartz offers to distribute his energy audit through Google’s host, Evan, to anyone who leaves a business card, allowing them to track their progress over time.
He shifts to analyzing the practical consequences of having low energy capacity across the physical, emotional, mental, and spiritual dimensions. People generally experience four distinct energy states throughout the day, but only one serves peak performance. To map these states, Schwartz introduces a simple two-axis model: the vertical axis measures the quantity of energy from low to high, while the horizontal axis measures the quality of energy from negative to positive.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: The Four Energy Quadrants
accDescr: A grid mapping energy quantity against energy quality into four performance zones.
subgraph HIGH["High Energy (Quantity)"]
direction LR
SZ["Survival Zone<br><b>High Negative</b><br>Fight or flight, anxious, defensive"]
PZ["Performance Zone<br><b>High Positive</b><br>Energized, focused, exuberant"]
end
subgraph LOW["Low Energy (Quantity)"]
direction LR
BZ["Burnout / Depletion<br><b>Low Negative</b><br>Exhausted, depressed, hopeless"]
RZ["Renewal / Recovery<br><b>Low Positive</b><br>Relaxed, calm, peaceful"]
end
SZ --- PZ
BZ --- RZ
```
[25:38](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=1538s) The Upper-Right Quadrant: The Truth About Peak Performance
Schwartz asks the audience to call out adjectives describing how they feel when operating at their absolute best. Audience members respond with words like “aligned,” “happy,” “satisfied,” “fulfilled,” “energized,” “excited,” and “exuberant.” These emotions fall directly into the upper-right quadrant: high quantity and positive quality.
Schwartz explains that when his organization began studying high performers and professional athletes 25 years earlier, conventional sports psychology claimed that performing at one's best required a baseline of mild anxiety. When Schwartz and his team surveyed athletes directly, the response contradicted prevailing dogma: “If you're feeling anxious when you're actually performing, be guaranteed, you're not going to perform at your best.”
While no one in the audience is surprised that positive emotions drive optimal execution, Schwartz delivers the crucial catch: if you do not feel positive emotions, you cannot perform at your best. When he challenges the room on whether they actually spend the vast majority of their workday feeling confident, exuberant, and passionate, heads shake. That discrepancy exposes a major performance problem: working in other emotional states carries severe, often uncalculated costs.
[28:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=1710s) The Upper-Left Quadrant: The High Cost of the Survival Zone
Schwartz turns to the upper-left quadrant—the high-quantity, negative-quality state known as the *Survival Zone*. Evolutionarily, this state exists for a vital reason: survival during acute, life-threatening danger. When facing a predator like a mountain lion or escaping a fire, the body shifts from the parasympathetic to the sympathetic nervous system. The limbic system bypasses the prefrontal cortex because it recognizes threats instantly and triggers a rapid fight-or-flight response.
The physiological mechanics of this state directly undermine modern cognitive work:
- Heart rate surges, muscles tense, and vision narrows.
- Adrenaline, noradrenaline, and cortisol flood the bloodstream.
- Blood diverts away from the prefrontal cortex and rushes into the extremities for fight or flight.
Schwartz highlights the absurdity of this reaction occurring at a desk: “The prefrontal cortex in true fight or flight when adrenaline and noradrenaline and cortisol flood through your body shuts down because you don't want it to be thinking.” When a boss yells, an unsolvable project problem stalls progress, or exhaustion breeds frustration, the body triggers that same primal threat response. With blood drained from the brain, analytical capacity collapses, reflective thought vanishes, and imaginative problem-solving becomes impossible.
[32:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=1928s) Contagious Stress, Burnout, and the Search for Recovery
Operating in the Survival Zone exacts severe costs beyond degraded immediate cognitive output. While cortisol is necessary for acute survival, prolonged circulation turns it toxic: “When it circulates for very long in your body, it becomes a toxin, a poison and it leads to virtually every, it has an impact on virtually every major illness and disease we know.”
Furthermore, energy is inherently contagious. For leaders, that emotional contagion is multiplied by their status. To illustrate emotional contagion, Schwartz jokes: “If you have any doubt that energy is contagious, when we're finished with this talk, let's go down together and walk in to the local Department of Motor Vehicles and see if your energy changes.” Conversely, an upbeat, smiling person greeting travelers in an airport security line instantly lifts everyone around them—the exact dynamic underlying great salesmanship.
Beyond health and social damage, the Survival Zone functions like a gas-guzzling car, rapidly draining reserves. When prolonged stress depletes high negative energy, individuals drop into the lower-left quadrant: low quantity, negative quality (the burnout or depletion zone). Schwartz notes that this zone carries a cultural taboo; when an audience member named Rachel raises her hand to acknowledge feeling this way at work, Schwartz jokes, “Rachel, put your hand down,” noting that people rarely admit to being burned out because it is seen as culturally unacceptable. Finally, Schwartz invites the room to identify the remaining lower-right quadrant (low quantity, positive quality), prompting suggestions such as “maintenance” and “resting.”
[35:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=2113s) The Disrespected Recovery Zone and Workplace Reality
Tony Schwartz quizzes the audience on how they spend their working hours across four energetic zones: Performance (upper right: high positive), Survival (upper left: high negative), Burnout (lower left: low negative), and Recovery (lower right: low positive). When he asks who actually spends non-performance time kicked back in the recovery zone versus survival or burnout, only about eight people out of a hundred raise their hands, while the rest stay silent. By process of elimination, Schwartz notes that whenever people fall out of the performance zone, they almost inevitably default to the upper-left survival zone. While he acknowledges they certainly spend time performing at Google, the reality of constant workplace demands prevents anyone from staying there permanently.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: The Four Energy Quadrants
accDescr: A two-by-two grid showing energy states based on emotional valence (negative vs positive) and physiological arousal (high vs low).
subgraph HighEnergy ["High Energy (High Arousal)"]
direction LR
SZ["Survival Zone\n(High Negative)\nAnxiety, Fear, Urgency"]
PZ["Performance Zone\n(High Positive)\nFocus, Engagement, Flow"]
end
subgraph LowEnergy ["Low Energy (Low Arousal)"]
direction LR
BZ["Burnout Zone\n(Low Negative)\nExhaustion, Depression"]
RZ["Recovery Zone\n(Low Positive)\nRecharging, Rest, Renewal"]
end
When an audience member asks which zone the room is currently inhabiting, Schwartz jokes that everyone present is pushed into the high-positive quadrant simply because he is up front expending massive energy: “I know I'm there and I'm the person who's generating the most energy. So, it would be hard for you to be depressed with me running around like a chicken with my head cutoff trying to entertain you.” Turning back to corporate culture, he explains that the recovery zone is universally treated with suspicion and dismissed as slacking off. Even vacation has ceased to be a true sanctuary of renewal. When he asks how many attendees took a vacation during the prior year without answering a single work email, only about six percent raise their hands.
- Roughly 6% of the Googlers in the audience managed to take a vacation in the past year without checking or responding to work email.
- The standard, reactive daily pattern oscillates between the high-positive Performance Zone and the high-negative Survival Zone, collapsing into Burnout only when energy is utterly depleted.
[38:28](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=2308s) Balancing Energy: Lessons from Elite Athletes and Pit Stops
Schwartz proposes a fundamental paradigm shift: instead of bouncing reactively between high-positive performance and high-negative survival, people must learn to move intentionally and rhythmically between high performance and true recovery. Drawing on principles observed in world-class athletes, he emphasizes that human beings are not linear machines. Elite athletes treat rest not as an indulgence, but as an essential training component governed by precise work-rest ratios, interval training, and periodization. “Recovery is performance specific. It affects your ability to perform at a high-level and to perform at a level of high-quality.”
He contrasts this intentional rhythm with the modern worker's operating mode: running completely “flat out” until collapsing. To illustrate the flaw in this approach, Schwartz uses the metaphor of the Indianapolis 500. The winning driver is never the one who attempts to drive continuously at maximum speed without stopping; rather, it is the driver who drives as fast as possible on the track and executes pit stops with maximum efficiency. Pit crews train recovery as a high-performance craft, routinely replacing four tires, cleaning windshield wipers, and refueling a car in approximately fifteen seconds. Schwartz argues that higher demands require more frequent pit stops, yet people constantly substitute genuine rest with chemical crutches, living by the motto: “I try to keep my coffee buzz going till the Martini buzz kicks in.”
- Winning performance hinges on the quality and efficiency of recovery, not simply driving non-stop until the vehicle breaks down.
- An average Formula or IndyCar pit stop lasts roughly 15 seconds, demonstrating that renewal can be brief if executed with discipline and precision.
- “In order for us to sustain performance, we need to learn to balance the expenditure of energy with the intermittent renewal of energy,” Tony Schwartz stated.
[42:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=2569s) Ultradian Rhythms and the Performance Pulse
Human biology operates on oscillations rather than linear timelines. Schwartz points out that every organ and biological system—from individual cellular pulsations to heart rate variability and the contract-relax mechanics of muscular movement—functions as a pulse. When people ignore these natural rhythms and attempt to match the continuous, linear output of computers, they suffer physical penalties such as neck, back, and joint pain. Beyond the familiar 24-hour circadian cycle governing nighttime sleep and daytime waking, the human body operates on an ultradian cycle known as the Basic Rest-Activity Cycle (BRAC).
```mermaid
flowchart LR
accTitle: The Ultradian Performance Pulse
accDescr: Flowchart illustrating the 90-120 minute cycle of high physiological arousal followed by an energy dip, and the choice between synthetic override versus true renewal.
A["High Arousal Work\n(90–120 minutes)"] --> B["Ultradian Trough\n(Energy Drop & Fatigue)"]
B --> C{"Worker Response"}
C -->|"Override"| D["Survival Zone\nCaffeine, Adrenaline, Cortisol"]
C -->|"Pit Stop"| E["Intentional Recovery\nTrue Disengagement & Renewal"]
D --> A
E --> A
```
While nighttime sleep cycles move from light and REM stages into deep delta rest every 90 to 120 minutes, an identical rhythm persists throughout the waking day at higher physiological arousal. At the end of every 90- to 120-minute cycle, the body experiences a distinct physiological trough. Instead of taking an intermittent break, most workers override these biological signals with coffee, Diet Coke, and their body's internal emergency stimulants: adrenaline, noradrenaline, and cortisol. Pushing through this dip forces people into the survival quadrant and clouds cognitive sharpness. High performance requires clear boundaries where engagement is fully focused and disengagement is completely disconnected:
> “So what we really want to do to perform at our best is to build a rhythmic relationship throughout the day where when you're engaged, you're truly engaged; and when you're disengaged, you're truly disengaged and you're not living in the gray zone in between.”
- Heart rate variability serves as a primary marker of physical health, reflecting the heart's capability to oscillate flexibly between high demand and rest.
- Ultradian cycles (the Basic Rest-Activity Cycle) cause a natural physiological energy dip every 90 to 120 minutes during the workday.
- Schwartz points to a recent *60 Minutes* broadcast featured on The Energy Project's homepage that documents the severe physiological costs of chronic sleep deprivation.
- Physical fitness is ultimately defined not by how long one can strain, but by the speed of recovery.
[47:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=2831s) Pacing vs. Sprinting: The Paradigm Shift in Energy Management
Tony Schwartz explains that recovery is a trainable capacity: the more an individual trains themselves to recover, the faster and more proficient they become at it. This deliberate oscillation is essential for sustainable high performance and meeting intense demand. Pointing out the typical daily pattern, he notes that people spend their days ricocheting reactively between the high-negative and high-positive energy zones whenever fatigue sets in, becoming irritable, anxious, and frustrated as reserves run dry. To counter this, Schwartz urges a shift toward intentional energy management, introducing renewal breaks every 90 to 120 minutes.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: Marathon vs Sprinter Mindset
accDescr: Comparison showing the marathon approach of pacing and disengagement versus the sprinter approach of full engagement followed by renewal.
subgraph Marathon["Marathon Mindset (Reactive)"]
M1["No finish line in sight"] --> M2["Unconscious pacing & partial engagement"]
M2 --> M3["Chronic depletion, irritability & burnout"]
end
subgraph Sprinter["Sprinter Mindset (Intentional)"]
S1["Clear 90-120 min interval"] --> S2["100% full engagement"]
S2 --> S3["Defined finish line"]
S3 --> S4["Deliberate recovery & renewal"]
S4 --> S1
end
```
He frames this shift as moving away from living life like a marathon runner. In a marathon, where the race feels endless and has no visible finish line, people either consciously or unconsciously pace themselves by withholding full engagement:
> “I’m suggesting to you a really radical idea. Reinvent yourself as a sprinter.”
A sprinter crouches at the starting blocks, looks down at a finite 100-, 200-, or 400-yard track, and commits to expending 100 percent of their energy because an endpoint exists where they can immediately stop and recover. In contrast, modern work life has stripped away boundaries, stopping points, and finish lines. Schwartz observes that the very devices and technologies that allow workers to be connected all the time have made it virtually impossible to ever disconnect.
[50:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=3011s) Building Positive Rituals to Drive Real Change
Testing the audience's willingness to act, Schwartz asks how many people find that his framework makes fundamental sense; nearly every hand in the room goes up. He then asks how many people will honestly walk out of the room and immediately make fundamental changes in their lives based on the talk. Only two or three hands remain raised. Schwartz reassures them that this failure to change is not personal weakness: human beings are creatures of habit who default to repeating yesterday's actions today and tomorrow. Relying exclusively on conscious will and the prefrontal cortex rarely creates lasting change; instead, individuals must co-opt the autonomic nervous system by establishing automatic, repetitive behaviors.
> “To manage your energy more optimally, you have to build what we call positive rituals. These are highly specific behaviors that become automatic over time.”
To build an effective ritual, Schwartz instructs attendees to pick one question from the Energy Project audit that yielded an upsetting or costly "yes" answer, and design a replacement behavior. Vague resolutions—such as deciding to work out three days a week—almost always fail because they lack precise scheduling, causing people to default back to pressing demands under stress. Success requires treating the habit like an immovable Google calendar appointment:
- **Specific scheduling**: Designating the exact day, wake-up time, and activity (e.g., waking at 6:45 a.m. to do cardiovascular training on Monday and Wednesday at 7:00 a.m., and strength training on Friday).
- **Friction reduction**: Preparing equipment the night before, such as setting out workout clothes.
- **The ritual benchmark**: A behavior has officially become a ritual when skipping it feels worse than expending the energy to execute it.
- **Immediate implementation**: Defining the specific, bite-sized ritual within the next hour before post-lecture motivation dissipates.
- **Achievable scoping**: If someone does not exercise at all, they should start with a 15-minute walk in the middle of the day rather than committing to five 30-minute runs.
[55:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=3311s) Q&A: Emotional and Mental Rituals, and the Tennis Discovery
Opening the floor to questions alongside Google host Wittenberg, Schwartz responds to an audience member asking for concrete examples of non-physical rituals. Because human biology naturally defaults toward negative emotions under pressure, emotional rituals are necessary to pump positive fuel into the system:
> “What you do want to do emotionally is you want to drive as much positive energy into your reservoir as you can because we default to negative emotions.”
Schwartz outlines two specific emotional rituals:
- **Notes of appreciation**: Writing a note once or twice a week to recognize someone who does not receive enough credit, which benefits both the recipient and the writer's emotional state.
- **End-of-day inventory**: Writing down three specific things that are going right in one's life in a journal before leaving work or going to sleep.
For mental focus, Schwartz recommends dedicating the first 60 to 90 minutes of the workday entirely to the single task that creates the greatest long-term value, rather than succumbing to the reactive trap of opening email first and operating at the mercy of other people's priorities. This critical morning block must be decided and scheduled the night before.
An attendee then asks about the tennis research Schwartz skipped earlier. Schwartz laughs, remarking, “God bless you. You can't get away with anything at Google.” He recounts his early research alongside his former partner, Jim Loehr, studying top-200 professional tennis players. They struggled to see what separated the elite players from the tier just below them while points were being played. The breakthrough came when Loehr observed two top competitors sharing a court and noticed that between points, elite players engaged in an identical, unconscious four-step sequence of behaviors to rapidly drop their heart rates and recover before the next point began.
[58:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=3504s) Renewal Rituals and the Heart Rate Recovery of Elite Athletes
Tony Schwartz explains the hidden mechanics of how world-class tennis players sustain peak performance under pressure. Unbeknownst even to themselves, top competitors systematically exploit the brief 20 to 30 seconds between points to refuel their bodies and achieve rapid physiological recovery. Schwartz breaks this down into four specific, sequenced physical behaviors:
```mermaid
flowchart TD
accTitle: Four-step recovery sequence
accDescr: The four sequential actions tennis players take between points to drop heart rate and renew energy.
subgraph S1["Mental Disengagement"]
A["Turn away from the net"] --> B["Leave the previous point behind"]
end
subgraph S2["Physical Relaxation"]
B --> C["Switch racket to non-dominant hand"]
C --> D["Allow dominant arm to relax"]
end
subgraph S3["Focus and Physiology"]
D --> E["Fiddle with racket strings"]
E --> F["Adopt the upright 'peacock walk'"]
end
```
First, the player turns their back to the net, symbolically and mentally putting the finished point behind them. Second, they switch the racket over to their non-dominant hand, which allows their dominant arm and shoulder muscles to completely relax. Third, they begin adjusting or playing with the strings on their racket, a repetitive action that narrows their mental focus to the immediate physical task rather than worrying about the score. Fourth, they carry themselves with an upright, confident posture that Schwartz and his colleagues dubbed the "peacock walk." Schwartz points out the mind-body connection here: how a person holds their body directly dictates how they feel, and feeling better elevates subsequent performance.
When researchers monitored the players during these intervals, they discovered that executing these four sequenced steps caused heart rates to plunge at an astonishing rate of approximately one beat per second. As Schwartz observes: “So, the great players were getting 20 to 30 heartbeats of recovery between every point and the players who weren't doing this sequenced set of recovery activities were getting virtually none.”
[59:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=3572s) Managing the Post-Lunch Energy Slump and Conclusion
An audience member challenges Schwartz's framing of human oscillation. The questioner remarks that Schwartz assumes people primarily bounce between positive and negative emotions across high-energy states. In reality, the audience member finds himself fluctuating along an axis of high versus low energy. He gives the relatable example of eating lunch right after the talk: he anticipates sinking into a familiar post-lunch slump where he will not feel angry or negative toward anyone, but simply sluggish, tired, and ready for a nap.
Schwartz responds by validating the physiological reality of circadian rhythms, but insists that intentional habits can dramatically blunt the dreaded afternoon crash. He argues that by building deliberate recovery breaks into the workday early on—beginning an hour and a half after arriving at the office, alternating bouts of intense focus with conscious rejuvenation—an individual will avoid feeling completely drained after lunch. Schwartz draws on his own transformation, noting that he used to be utterly exhausted every afternoon until he overhauled his daily routines. While biology dictates that a person will inevitably have less cognitive stamina during the circadian trough around 2:30 or 3:00 PM compared to 10:00 AM, pacing transforms day-to-day work capacity. As Schwartz emphasizes: “But, I will promise you that you will get a much more even availability of energy if you more regularly and intermittently build in periods of recovery.”
Following this response, the event host, Wittenberg, closes the session. He notes that time has run out, invites anyone interested to join Schwartz for lunch or ask questions at the front of the room, and leads the audience in a final round of applause.
- High-demand, complex cognitive tasks should be scheduled earlier in the morning or delayed until after the mid-afternoon circadian dip passes.
- Regular, intermittent intervals of rest fundamentally stabilize energy availability across the entire workday.
## Notable quotes
> [38:28](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=2308s) In order for us to sustain performance, we need to learn to balance the expenditure of energy with the intermittent renewal of energy — Tony Schwartz
> [50:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=3011s) To manage your energy more optimally, you have to build what we call positive rituals. These are highly specific behaviors that become automatic over time. — Tony Schwartz
> [47:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=2831s) I’m suggesting to you a really radical idea. Reinvent yourself as a sprinter. — Tony Schwartz
> [38:28](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=2308s) Recovery is performance specific. It affects your ability to perform at a high-level and to perform at a level of high-quality. — Tony Schwartz
> [55:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=3311s) What you do want to do emotionally is you want to drive as much positive energy into your reservoir as you can because we default to negative emotions. — Tony Schwartz
> [25:38](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=1538s) If you're feeling anxious when you're actually performing, be guaranteed, you're not going to perform at your best. — Tony Schwartz
## Mentioned
Tony Schwartz, Evan Wittenberg, Google, Google University, The Energy Project, The New York Times, Newsweek, New York Magazine, Esquire, Fast Company, Donald Trump, The Art of the Deal, What Really Matters: Searching for Wisdom in America, The Power of Full Engagement, BlackBerry, Indianapolis 500, 60 Minutes, Jim Loehr, Harvard Business Review
## Video description
Tony Scwartz spoke at the Google headquarters in Mountain View, Californiaon 4/17/2008 as part of the Leading@google speaker series.
Tony Schwartz is the founder and president of The Energy Project http://www.theenergyproject.com/home.html. He is the co-author of "The Power of Full Engagement", which has been translated into 24 languages. Tony has written three other books, including What Really Matters: Searching for Wisdom in America. His most recent article, "The Science of Stamina," was published in the October 2007 issue of the Harvard Business Review.
Demand is relentlessly rising. Our capacity is not keeping pace. The traditional solution to higher demand has been to invest more time. Unfortunately, time is finite, and most of us have no hours left to invest. Energy, however, can be systematically expanded --- and it can also be regularly renewed. To operate at our best, we need four energy sources: physical (quantity), emotional (quality), mental (focus), and the energy of the human spirit (purpose). This talk will focus on the role of energy in fueling sustainable high performance, and in motivating others.
[38:28] Tony Schwartz: In order for us to sustain performance, we need to learn to balance the expenditure of energy with the intermittent renewal of energy
[50:11] Tony Schwartz: To manage your energy more optimally, you have to build what we call positive rituals. These are highly specific behaviors that become automatic over time.
[47:11] Tony Schwartz: I’m suggesting to you a really radical idea. Reinvent yourself as a sprinter.
[38:28] Tony Schwartz: Recovery is performance specific. It affects your ability to perform at a high-level and to perform at a level of high-quality.
[55:11] Tony Schwartz: What you do want to do emotionally is you want to drive as much positive energy into your reservoir as you can because we default to negative emotions.
[25:38] Tony Schwartz: If you're feeling anxious when you're actually performing, be guaranteed, you're not going to perform at your best.
Original transcript
[0:00] >> WITTENBERG: Hi, everybody. Thank you for
coming. My name is Evan Wittenberg. I work
[0:04] in the leadership development and people management
group as part of Google University. And we're
[0:08] very excited today to be introducing Tony
Schwartz as our next Leading@Google lecturer.
[0:14] Tony has an interesting history. Currently,
he's the founder, president, and CEO of a
[0:18] company called the Energy Project which deals
all about with how to manage your energy,
[0:22] not your time to be more effective and achieve
optimal performance in the workplace, at home,
[0:26] in life, et cetera. His background is really
interesting. He began his career as a journalist.
[0:31] He was a reporter for the New York Times,
associate editor at Newsweek, staff writer
[0:35] at New York and Esquire Magazines, and a columnist
for Fast Company. He also has a little dirty
[0:41] secret from his past, co-authored the number
one, international bestseller "The Art of
[0:44] the Deal" with Donald Trump. So if you have
questions about his opinion of Trump, you
[0:48] can ask him later. And more importantly, wrote
a book call "What Really Matters: Searching
[0:52] for Wisdom in America." What he's here to
talk to us today about is what I alluded to
[0:57] you before, how we can be more effective by
thinking about our energy throughout the day
[1:01] rather than our time. And he's actually piloted
his two-day version of the course here at
[1:07] Google that some people on the audience, raise
your hand if you've been through that course;
[1:11] a couple of people. So, you can look around
and ask them later if you want to know how
[1:14] that was and we'll be announcing more about
that in the next few weeks. A couple of important
[1:19] things that Tony has asked, one thing that
you'll learn about in this book when you read
[1:23] it, for those of you who got it, "The Power
of Full Engagement," is that the brain is
[1:26] actually unable to multitask. So Tony has
asked to please close your laptops unless
[1:30] you're actually taking notes about this because
it's not possible to pay attention to both
[1:34] even though we fool ourselves about that all
the time. There will be time at the end for
[1:38] questions and I would ask you to please come
up to this microphone at the end if you have
[1:42] questions about the talk. Hopefully, Tony
will keep you engaged so you won't be tempted
[1:46] to go back to the Blackberrys and computers
throughout the talk. And I think without further
[1:51] adieu, let me introduce Tony Schwartz. Welcome.
>> SCHWARTZ: Thank you. Thank you. Good morning.
[1:58] It's great to be here with a wonderful day.
This work comes out of a passion of mine that
[2:05] began somewhere in my teens when other people
were doing things very different than I was
[2:09] doing. I was trying to figure out what life
was all about and what made it possible, what
[2:14] was it that made it possible, I guess, back
then to be a happier and more satisfied human
[2:18] being than I was growing up in a difficult
New York Jewish family. But over time that
[2:24] evolved into a passion around, what makes
it possible for a person to be all they're
[2:30] capable of being. What makes it possible for
a human being to build progressively over
[2:36] their life a richer, deeper version of who
they are? And this work is about that. It's
[2:43] nominally about helping organizations to be
more effective and more productive. It's nominally
[2:50] about the difference about what it takes to
be a great leader. But I deeply believe that
[2:55] you can be a great human being and it may
or may not have any impact on--I'm sorry,
[3:01] you could be--yes, you could be a great human
being and it may or may not have any impact
[3:05] on whether you can be a great leader. But
you can't be a great leader if you're not
[3:10] a great human being. And so to me, the work
of leadership, the work of really being the
[3:17] most effective you can possibly be begins
with the work of yourself. And so today, I'm
[3:23] going to give you just a little taste of it.
You're going to see that it's oriented a little
[3:28] bit in the physical direction and that's largely
because everything begins with the body. I
[3:33] want to assure you that if you choose to,
if you're intrigued by this work that there's
[3:38] a lot more to it and that we ultimately take
account of quite a wide variety of components
[3:46] that influenced your capacity to show up with
everything you've got in each part of your
[3:51] life. So, what is it that starts us off? What
is it that makes it possible for me to get
[3:58] folks interested in bringing me into organizations?
And basically, it's this. It's that we have
[4:06] developed a gap between demand and capacity.
So, here's the deal. In your lives, what happens
[4:13] is when you're born, you obviously have very
low demand. You make a lot of demands but
[4:18] you don't have a lot of demand. And your demand
progressively goes up over time. And in the
[4:24] world we live in, it just keeps on going until
hopefully one day you drop off the face of
[4:28] the cliff and your demands in the most graceful
way possible. But in the meantime, what's
[4:35] happening is that in the absence of a conscious
and intentional intervention on your part,
[4:43] the capacity you bring to the table is rising
no matter what you do. How many people here--well,
[4:50] I don't want to ask that quite yet--the capacity
in your life is rising no matter what you
[4:55] do to your body, no matter what you do to
yourself. Your capacity just keeps on going
[5:00] up, but it hits a peak at a certain point
in your life in the absence of intervention.
[5:07] What age do you think that peak is?
>> MALE: Forty-five.
[5:12] >> SCHWARTZ: Unfortunately, it is 30 not 45.
Now, in this group unlike most of the groups
[5:20] I talked to, that's not yet such bad news
for you because you're not there yet. But
[5:24] guess what, even if you're not, I promise
you will be. And what happens then is that
[5:30] your capacity progressively diminishes over
time most especially, most especially at the
[5:38] physical level. So for example, in the absence
of you're doing anything to keep this from
[5:43] happening, from the age of 30 on, you will
lose one half pound of lean muscle mass every
[5:48] year for the rest of your life. That's not
good news. And the reason it's not good news
[5:55] is that demand is not only--how many of you
would say that the demand in your life over
[6:00] the last two or three years is as high as
it's ever been in your life. Okay. And how
[6:07] many of you expect given that you probably
pushed yourself pretty damn hard to get to
[6:11] where you are today that over the next year
the demand in your life will finally begin
[6:18] to diminish. So, in other words, your demand
is the highest it's been ever over the last
[6:25] three years and you have every expectation
that it's going to continue to rise at a minimum
[6:31] not to diminish. Let me ask you this question.
How many of you think that along with your
[6:36] demand your capacity will rise systematically
to keep pace with your demand over the next
[6:44] period of time? Houston, we got a problem.
It's this problem, it's this gap, and that's
[6:51] the game we're in the business of trying to
address. So, the issue is that when it comes
[7:00] to meeting demand, the number one resource
most of us use, naturally use, instinctively
[7:07] use is our time. So, if you've got more demand,
you put in more hours. And I'm sure that many
[7:13] of you are putting in a lot of hours. And
in fact, organizations, even progressive organizations
[7:19] like Google, even if it doesn't say it, even
if it has all sorts of wonderful things to
[7:23] give you an opportunity not to be working
does in fact value you to a considerable degree
[7:30] based on the number of hours it's perceived
that you invest. Now, that's great for a certain
[7:36] period of time. But when you reach the limit
of the number of hours you have available
[7:43] to invest, you've got a problem when it comes
to expanding your capacity, don't you. How
[7:49] many people here would like me to stop, spend
a few minutes giving you some advice on how
[7:54] to use your free hours? So, we're already.
That dance card is already full, isn't it?
[8:00] That dance card is fall and the bottom line
is that time is finite. You've got 168 hours
[8:07] in the week. You're never going to have another
hour and you already don't have any free but
[8:11] I guess you're--but I know that your demand
is rising. So, that's not going to solve your
[8:16] problem if we are going to make it possible
to meet the increasing demand in our lives,
[8:22] to take account of the fact that we live in
a more complex world, what you're going to
[8:26] have to do is you're going to have to find
a way other than time to get more done. In
[8:31] other words, you're going to have to get more
than in less time. And the only way that we
[8:36] have recognized that that really fundamentally
is possible is to go after a different resource
[8:41] and that resource is energy. And the reason
energy is a good resource to use is because
[8:47] energy unlike time is inside you. Time is
outside you. It moves by you like a train
[8:53] and once it's gone, it's gone forever. But
energy is inside you and it can be systematically
[8:58] expanded and it can be regularly renewed.
So energy is a fabulous resource to put it
[9:06] in your disposal. But what is energy? What
is energy? Because it's easy to say energy;
[9:11] there's all kinds of energy and, you know,
it's easy to get real soft on the idea of
[9:17] energy. One of the reasons that organizations
use hours is they're very clear to calibrate,
[9:23] minutes, hours, days, that's really easy to
calibrate. Energy is more ambiguous, more
[9:27] subjective. So what is energy? Well, it turns
out, actually, energy has been defined. Energy
[9:33] is the capacity to do work, that's what you
go in your physics courses, right? Energy
[9:37] is the capacity to do work. So in other words,
in simple terms, if you have more energy,
[9:44] you have more capacity, don't you? So in other
words, if I can help you to systematically
[9:49] build the reservoir of energy that you have
available, if I could put more fuel in your
[9:54] tank then presumably you'll have more capacity.
We tend to focus on skills and competencies,
[10:01] that's the life you've lived. You've all developed
an enormous number of skills, you've had all
[10:06] kinds of achievements around skills and you've
been measured by how many of those skills
[10:11] you have. You've got into Google because you
have more than most people, way more than
[10:15] most people. But here's the problem in a demand-laden
world with focusing simply on capacity. I'm
[10:23] sorry, on competency. Capacity is underneath
competency. Capacity is what makes it possible
[10:30] for you to bring your skill and talent to
life. You can't run on empty, although a lot
[10:35] of us try to do it. So if you are trying to
bring your skill and talent to life but you
[10:40] are, you didn't sleep a lot last night or
you don't eat the right foods, or you've got
[10:45] the wrong emotional state, or you weren't
good at focusing your attention, or your level
[10:49] of commitment and passion isn't all that high,
these are all components of capacity, then
[10:54] you're not going to be able to do it. And
we all know people, and we all know times
[10:58] in our lives when you--despite your enormous
skill and talent, haven't been able to deliver
[11:03] it, particularly under pressure. In a human
being, I'm sorry--in a car, you need one source
[11:11] of energy to get the thing to go, and mostly
it's been fuel. Now it's starting to change
[11:17] but it still going to primarily be one source
of energy. But a human being--a human being
[11:23] requires a much more complex set of energies,
energy in the human system is multidimensional.
[11:30] We need four separate sources of energy in
order to be able to perform at our best, each
[11:37] one of them is necessary, none of them is
sufficient by itself and they deeply influence
[11:42] one another. So you can't get by--or I shouldn't
say get by, you can get by using only one
[11:48] or two of them to any great effect but you
can't operate at your best if you do that.
[11:53] So what are these four sources of energy?
So I've already said that, so I don't need
[11:59] to repeat it. The four--the four sources of
energy start with the physical, why? Because
[12:06] the physical is the base, it's the--it's the
foundation on which everything else rests.
[12:13] If you don't have sufficient physical energy,
is it going to influence your focus of attention?
[12:18] Is it going to influence your ability to manage
your emotion under pressure? Of course it
[12:22] is. So, we have tended to make this not performance
relevant or relevant to performance in the
[12:29] work place, we've discounted how important
physical energy is, and we haven't systematically
[12:35] focused attention on it, and in fact increasingly
in schools for kids where we're starting to
[12:40] do work we see that they basically dispense
with the physical dimension. They don't pay
[12:44] attention to it at all. You know, if you're
not on a varsity team in high school, then
[12:50] you're not getting any attention to your physical
capacity. Physical capacity has four components.
[12:56] It's the simplest of all the capacities because
of that. Number one, nutrition; you're ability
[13:02] to move glucose and sustain glucose at a certain
level in your body, that's number one. Number
[13:07] two, fitness; how well you transport oxygen
through your body. Number three is sleep;
[13:14] how well do you sleep, do you sleep enough
hours, do you sleep deeply enough. And the
[13:19] forth is, and this is the one that people
don't pay much attention to is recovery or
[13:23] renewal; the day time equivalent of sleep
because the body is designed to sleep twice.
[13:29] The body is designed to sleep for a longer
period of time at night and it's designed
[13:32] to sleep for a short period of time in the
afternoon. And so it's also designed, unlike
[13:38] a machine, it's designed to move rhythmically
between the expenditure and the recovery of
[13:43] energy. And so you need to, as you'll see
when I get a little further into this description,
[13:49] you need to learn to value intermittent renewal
during the day in the same way that you currently,
[13:55] I don't want to say in the same way that you
currently value sleep because a lot of you
[13:58] don't value sleep very much. But in the way
you should be valuing sleep. Okay. So that's
[14:03] physical energy. Then there is the quality
of your energy. The quality of your energy,
[14:07] that's how you feel because how you feel profoundly
influences how well you perform, how well
[14:15] you lead, how well you interact with others,
there is a very specific set of emotions that
[14:22] are associated with sustainable high performance,
and I'm going to get to those and talk about
[14:27] those in just a moment. So we've got quantity
of energy, we've got quality of energy, and
[14:32] then we've got focus of energy. So that's
the mental dimension. Focus of energy is what
[14:36] the Evan was obliquely referring to when he
said that I didn't want you to be using your
[14:41] computers and Blackberrys. The reason I actually
didn't want you to is because it makes me
[14:45] feel bad. It makes me feel like you don't
care, like you don't love me, and I have a
[14:53] high need. But the focus of your energy is,
the work we do around this dimension and the
[15:01] importance of it is that for thousands of
years it has been understood that we do our
[15:09] most effective work when we focus on one thing
at a time. That's were the meditative traditions
[15:15] came from. We have lost that. Google is responsible
for a lot of that because of the number of
[15:22] opportunities it gives us to interrupt our
attention, but there are thousands of ways
[15:27] now that we get our attention interrupted
and it's at extraordinary cause to your productivity.
[15:34] It's also at extraordinary cause to the depth
of work that you do. You know that if you
[15:38] go out and try to take a run for example,
that the first two or three minutes or the
[15:44] first five minutes, how do you feel? You don't
feel very good, you're not warmed up, you're
[15:50] not feeling like your muscles are warm, like
you're loose, like you're in your rhythm.
[15:54] Well the same thing is true mentally, if you
try to begin a hard task for the first three
[16:01] minutes, or five minutes, or eight minutes,
or whatever it is for you, you're going to
[16:05] be half there and half not there. You are
slowly dropping down into a state of absorption.
[16:10] If you interrupt yourself frequently then
what you are doing is you're interfering with
[16:15] that level of absorption, and on average,
the average person stays on task in an organization
[16:22] in an America today for eleven minutes. Eleven
minutes on a task before they go on to another
[16:29] task, but during those eleven minutes, they
interrupt themselves with something, an average
[16:35] of every three minutes. So you can see that
we've got a big interference with our ability
[16:40] to bring absorbed attention to the table which
is part of the energy equation. And then finally,
[16:45] there is the one that sounds as soft as in
fact probably the most important which is
[16:50] what we call the energy of the human spirit.
The energy of the human spirit is the energy
[16:58] derived from the sense, from the experience
of purpose and from an alignment between what
[17:06] you say is important in your life and how
you actually live; and the better that alignment,
[17:13] the more powerful the source of energy available
to you. In fact, this energy drives, this
[17:19] is the "Why," the others of the "Hows." This
"Why" energy drives your behavior at all the
[17:25] other level. So, it's an additional source
of energy, emotionally, mentally, and physically
[17:31] when you've got it in place. So four sources
of energy, if you got all those four sources
[17:35] of energy happening for you, if you've got
that full reservoir of them, then you could
[17:40] fire on all cylinders. How many of you got
those nailed, those four? Let's find out.
[17:47] You got a pencil, or you got something that
you can write on? I'm going to take you through
[17:51] a little energy audit; that's what we call,
a little energy audit to give you a sense
[17:56] of how you're doing in terms of these four
dimensions of energy. How much energy do you
[18:03] have available to you in each of these four
dimensions? This little audit is designed
[18:09] around what we have determined, and it's very
strongly research-based. If you go on our
[18:15] website, the energyproject.com, you will see
a database for everything that I'm talking
[18:21] about. So I'm not talking about these things
because they occurred to me as good ideas.
[18:25] This is our gathering of the research. So,
what I want you to do in each of these questions,
[18:32] I'd like you to answer, I'd like you to just
make a check mark on your paper if the answer
[18:38] to the question is yes. That's all you have
to do. And then at the end we'll add up the
[18:43] "yes" answers. Bad news is this is one of
those rare test where getting a "yes" doesn't
[18:49] serve you well. Number one, I don't regularly
get at least seven to eight hours of sleep,
[18:54] and I often wake up feeling tired. Number
two, I frequently skip breakfast or I settle
[19:00] for something that isn't particularly healthy.
Number three, I don't workout enough, meaning,
[19:06] cardiovascular training at least three times
a week and strength training at least once
[19:10] a week. If you don't do both of those, you're
a "yes." Number four, I don't take regular
[19:16] breaks during the day to renew and recharge,
and I often eat lunch at my desk if I ate
[19:22] lunch at all. Number five, I frequently find
myself feeling irritable, impatient, or anxious
[19:30] at work especially when demand is high. Number
six, I don't have enough time with my family
[19:36] and loved ones, and when I'm with them I'm
not always really with them. Number seven,
[19:42] I take too little time in my life for the
activities that I most deeply enjoy. Number
[19:48] eight, I rarely stop to express my appreciation
to others or to savor and celebrate my accomplishments
[19:57] and blessings. If you don't do both of those
things, you're a "yes." Number nine, I have
[20:03] difficulty focusing on one thing at a time,
and I'm easily distracted during the day,
[20:08] especially by email. That's a "yes" for all
of you. Number 10, I spend much of my time
[20:16] reacting to immediate demands rather than
focusing on activities with long-term value
[20:23] and higher leverage. Number 11, I don't take
enough time for reflections, strategizing,
[20:28] or thinking creatively. Number 12, I work
in the evenings and/or on the weekends and
[20:34] I rarely take a vacation free of work, if
I take a vacation at all. Number 13, I spend
[20:41] too little time at work doing what I do best
and enjoy most. Number 14, there are significant
[20:48] gaps between what I say is important in my
life and how I actually live; I say that my
[20:55] girlfriend, significant other, wife, husband
is important, but I don't spend much time
[21:00] or energy on that. Number 15, my decisions
at work are more influenced by external demands
[21:06] than by a strong, clear sense of my own purpose.
And finally, number 16, I don't invest enough
[21:12] positive time and energy in making a positive
difference to others in the world. Total them
[21:21] up. Okay. All right. There's what?
>> MALE: Cursing.
[21:38] >> SCHWARTZ: Cursing. So, how many people
have eight or more "yes" answers? Eight or
[21:42] more "yes" answers. Look around, the good
news is you've got company. The bad news is,
[21:46] you've got company. Eight or more. How many
people—you're going to hold it up or you're
[21:52] 12? How many people have 12 or more? How many
people who have 12 or more? Okay. How many
[21:57] people are happy about the number of "yes"
answers? How many? Five. And by the way, five
[22:05] is extraordinarily low. Five is extraordinarily
low, but not of those five is something that
[22:11] you are glad is a "yes," right? Right. So,
here's the interesting thing. I don't want
[22:16] to get into this too deeply because of the
time limitations, but just at the most simple,
[22:21] simple level. If you have eight "yes" answers,
think of it as 50 percent of the potential
[22:28] capacity available to you that is currently
available to you. That's enormous. What is
[22:36] this all about? Why does this happen? And
I will submit to you that the reason this
[22:41] happens is because we don't make capacity
important, because we take capacity for granted.
[22:47] We assume that if the demand goes up, our
capacity will expand naturally to meet it.
[22:53] But that's not the way it works, and it takes
a toll not only at the level of productivity
[22:58] but it takes a toll emotionally, it takes
a tool spiritually, and it takes a toll physically.
[23:04] So what really happens is that we go numbed
to this reality. We tend to not notice this.
[23:12] Once I put this up and you look at these answers
and you say to yourself, "Oh, my god. These
[23:17] are central things in life that are dead obvious
that I should be doing and I don't do them."
[23:22] You have a hundred stories you can tell me
if I let give you the time about why you don't
[23:27] do them. But the reality is it's not doing
you any good not to do them and it's getting
[23:32] in the way both in your professional and in
your personal life. So once I raise it up
[23:38] into consciousness which is step one, now
you can say to yourself, "Okay. So what do
[23:43] I do about this? What do I do about this because
Tony..." And this is the story part that begins:
[23:50] "I am working really long hours. I got a long
commute. I got obligations with my family.
[23:58] I've got other things I'd like to do. I can't
do all these things, so get real." All right.
[24:05] Well, I want to look at this because the real
issue for you once you've got this up and
[24:10] you're looking at it dead honest, and when
you walk out of here, I hope you will. In
[24:14] fact, anybody who would like me to send you
the energy audit, I'd be happy to send it
[24:19] through Evan and he will send it to anybody
who wants it. So give me your card at the
[24:23] end and I'll get you the energy audit so you
can keep track of how you're doing as the
[24:27] future unfolds before you. But what I want
to look at now is I want to look at the consequence
[24:38] of your having whatever level of capacity
you have. And the way I want to look at it
[24:42] in a very simple form based on the understanding
that we have four different energy states
[24:50] that we can find ourselves in in the course
of the day. But only one of those energy states
[24:57] serves us best. And those energy states are
fed by each of these dimensions that we've
[25:05] already been talking about by how much capacity
you have in each of these four tanks. So I
[25:11] want to look at the practical result of your
having those relatively frightening scores
[25:20] that most of you have. And this too can become
a very simple way. I'd also be happy when
[25:27] it's done to send you this slide. This too
is something that you can keep as a barometer
[25:33] or as a measure of how you're doing in the
course of the day. So let's take a look at
[25:38] it. We call this the energy quadrants, okay.
Now, the vertical axis refers to the quantity
[25:46] of your energy from low to high. Okay? And
then the horizontal axis refers to the quality
[25:51] of your energy from negative to positive.
So, therefore, we end up having four quadrants,
[25:57] four different kinds of energy. So let me
ask you this, if I ask you, "How do you feel?
[26:04] How do you feel when you're performing at
your best?" I'd like you to just throw out
[26:09] some adjectives at me. I'd like you to throw
out some adjectives that define how you feel
[26:14] when you're performing at your best.
>> MALE: Aligned.
[26:18] >> SCHWARTZ: Aligned. Happy.
>> FEMALE: Satisfied.
[26:20] >> SCHWARTZ: Satisfied. Aligned. Happy. Fulfilled.
>> FEMALE: Energized.
[26:25] >> SCHWARTZ: Energized.
>> MALE: Excited.
[26:27] >> SCHWARTZ: Excited.
>> FEMALE: Exuberant.
[26:29] >> SCHWARTZ: Exuberant. Okay. Which quadrant
do those go in?
[26:33] >> FEMALE: High positive.
>> SCHWARTZ: High positive. The upper-right
[26:35] quadrant. There's absolutely no question that
those are the adjectives that you feel. Those
[26:40] are the feeling you have when you're performing
at your best. This is a no-brainer. This is
[26:46] a no-brainer. And no matter how many people
we've asked this question to when we begun
[26:51] our work 25 years ago with professional athletes,
and we were told that, at that time, the prevailing
[26:58] view in sport psychology was that what, a,
athletes felt when they were performing at
[27:03] their best included a mild amount of anxiety.
So, we started asking people, you know. Is
[27:08] that what you're feeling? You feel of mild
anxiety, the answer was a 100 percent, no.
[27:13] They answered just the way you answered. What
we feel are positive emotions when we're performing
[27:18] at our best. Maybe before you perform, you
are feeling a little bit anxious in a performance
[27:23] demand. But, if you're feeling anxious when
you're actually performing, be guaranteed,
[27:28] you're not going to perform at your best.
So, there it is, that's--how many of you have
[27:33] learned something that you didn't know by
seeing that those are the emotions associated
[27:37] with high performance, nobody, right? Nobody,
that's no big surprise. Here's the surprise,
[27:42] if you're not feeling this way, you can't
perform at your best. Why is that a surprise?
[27:48] Well, because I have to ask you this question.
Is this the way you are feeling at work, energized,
[27:55] focus, passionate, confident, exuberant, the
vast majority at the time? Are there times
[28:03] when you're not feeling this way at work?
Is there anybody who sometimes doesn't feel
[28:09] those emotions at work? So then, the question
becomes, so when you're not feeling this way,
[28:17] how are you feeling and what's the consequence,
right? Because we need to know in the cost-benefit
[28:24] ratio if you aren't fueling yourself with
the right emotions, what's the cost, what's
[28:30] the consequence, so I'm going to start here
on the upper left because it's the only other
[28:36] zone--energy zone that has energy in it. An
absent energy or significant energy, absent
[28:43] energy, I don't care whether it's negative
or positive, you're not going to be very effective
[28:47] in work. So, when you look at this, we call
this the survival zone. Now it's interesting,
[28:54] the only reason in any of these zones exist
is because there is some circumstance or circumstances
[29:00] in your life when it's appropriate to be in
this zone, otherwise, from an evolutionary
[29:03] perspective, it would be naturally selected
out, wouldn't it? It only exists because there's
[29:08] a value in it. In other words, there's a time
in your life when it makes sense to be in
[29:13] this zone, it serves you best to be in this
zone, when is it?
[29:18] >> FEMALE: When you're threatened.
>> SCHWARTZ: When you're threatened. Here's
[29:22] the problem. If there is a large mountain
lion coming at you, being in the survival
[29:29] zone is a good thing. The reason is because
you will have a physiological shift from your
[29:35] parasympathetic nervous system to your sympathetic
nervous system from your prefrontal cortex
[29:40] testing your limbic system. And what it will--the
consequence of it is that you will be able
[29:45] to move more quickly. Your limbic system picks
up threat more quickly than your prefrontal
[29:50] cortex does, so it's really good when your
life is in danger. If there's a fire at the
[29:54] back in the room right now, I don't want you
to be asking yourself, "Let me see, how much
[29:59] longer can I listen to this talk before that."
What you want to do is you want the body to
[30:05] say to you, "Get the hell out and get out,"
or take water and put it on the fire, fight
[30:10] or flight, right? The problem of what you
said is that survival is not necessarily always
[30:19] a true threat to your life. So in other words,
you can feel a sense of threat and you can
[30:24] feel a sense of danger in your life, but it
might not actually be a threat, but the same
[30:30] physiological set of responses happens if
you feel threat. What happens? Well, your
[30:36] vision narrows; your heart rate increases;
your muscles contract; and most important
[30:43] in some sense, the blood rushes from your
brain into your extremities. Therefore, the
[30:48] blood is no longer in your brain. That's not
a good thing, if you have to think. Is there
[30:56] anybody here who spends any time during the
day thinking? That's not a good thing. In
[31:03] fact, it's not a metaphor I'm talking about,
it's literal. The prefrontal cortex in true
[31:09] fight or flight when adrenaline and noradrenaline
and cortisol flood through your body shuts
[31:14] down because you don't want it to be thinking.
It will interfere with your action. The problem
[31:20] is that when that happens, all sorts of other
things happen too. So if what's happened is
[31:26] your boss has yelled at you or your--maybe
you've got a problem in your work that you
[31:31] can't solve and your worried about meeting
a deadline or you feel too much demand in
[31:35] your life or you're negative because you're
exhausted, any of those, the problem is that
[31:43] it means that you're in not a position to
do a number of things. When you're in the
[31:48] upper left quadrant, here or some of the things,
if we had time, I'd get you to tell me, but
[31:52] you would know this, I promise you; but the
first thing is you perform worse in upper
[31:57] left. That's the first problem, because you
don't think well, because you can't be imaginative,
[32:04] because you aren't reflective, so you don't
perform as well. The second thing that happens
[32:08] is it's terrible for your health. Cortisol,
the hormone cortisol is very important for
[32:15] you in certain situations. When it circulates
for very long in your body, it becomes a toxin,
[32:20] a poison and it leads to virtually every,
it has an impact on virtually every major
[32:26] illness and disease we know. So to spend time
in that zone is very costly to your health,
[32:31] it's very costly to your performance. And
because energy is contagious, it's very influential
[32:38] to other people. For those of you in this
room who have responsibility for other people
[32:42] who are leaders, your energy is disproportionately
contagious by virtue of your position. And
[32:49] so you have a significant influence on other
people. If you have any doubt that energy
[32:54] is contagious, when we're finished with this
talk, let's go down together and walk in to
[32:59] the local Department of Motor Vehicles and
see if your energy changes. Energy is very
[33:07] powerful on your emotions. And so, if you
think if you think of the impact of your energy,
[33:17] it's not just that negative energy is affecting
you, it's that it's affecting other people.
[33:22] And you've had that experience. You've had
the opposite experience of what I'm talking
[33:25] about at the Department of Motor Vehicles.
You're going to a store or you show up on
[33:28] a line in an airport and somebody is in a
great mood and has got a smile on their face
[33:33] and is relaxed and is exuberant and saying,
"Hi, how you're doing today? You look beautiful.
[33:39] I bet you're going to have a great trip."
Does have an affect on you? Huge, it's unbelievable
[33:46] of what the impact of that is. That's what
a great salesman is. A great salesman is a
[33:50] person who is great at generating the energy
that makes people want to buy. It's about
[33:56] energy. Okay, so we've got all these costs
with the survival zone, and the most significant
[34:02] energy cost is what of being in a survival
zone. What's the cost of being in a survival
[34:08] zone from an energy perspective? It drains
it faster. It's like a gas guzzling car. And
[34:14] if you spend too much time in the high negative
zone, you end up in this zone. How many of
[34:19] you come to work feeling that way pretty often?
No, you don't, because it's not acceptable.
[34:25] Rachel, put your hand down. It's not acceptable
to be in that zone, is it? So if you were
[34:32] in that zone and you weren't Rachel, you wouldn't
admit it, right, because it's not culturally
[34:39] acceptable. To be in the upper left zone is
culturally acceptable to some extent. It's
[34:42] okay to be anxious. It's okay to be frustrated.
Though it shouldn't be, it is. But this zone
[34:48] is unacceptable. The reason is because this
zone is the worst place from which to perform,
[34:53] okay? All right, so, we've got these three
zones. We know the best zone. We know the
[34:59] two negative zones. The other zone, what do
you think we'd call the other zone?
[35:03] >> FEMALE: Maintenance.
>> SCHWARTZ: Maintenance is one word. Resting
[35:09] is one word, any other words? Because we got
to come up with a name for it, otherwise,
[35:13] it won't be parallel. We need four names here.
I need some help. Okay, it's the recovery
[35:19] zone, right? Now, if I were to ask you, "Where
is it that you spend most of your time at
[35:26] work? Where is it then you spend most of your
at work when you're not in a performance zone?"
[35:32] How many people would say, "Oh, I spend my
time in the recovery zone. I'm just chilled
[35:35] out, relaxed, kicked back?" How many people
would say it's the survival zone? How many
[35:43] people would say it's the--a burn out zone?
Okay, we've got 8 answers and a hundred people
[35:49] in the room. How many people refuse to answer?
The answer in most of your case is by, simply
[35:56] by elimination, it's going to be that upper
left zone. It's going to be somewhere in that
[36:00] upper left zone when you're not in upper right.
I'm not suggesting for a moment that you're
[36:04] not spending significant amounts of time in
upper right, I hope you are, but I also know
[36:09] that the likelihood is in the face of all
the things you face that you have to deal
[36:13] that you're not spending all of your time
there and there are probably a significant
[36:16] amount of times you're not. Now, that means...
>> Well, are we in the right most...?
[36:23] >> SCHWARTZ: Where are you right now? Well,
everybody here is way up in the high positive
[36:26] because you're listening to this. I don't
know where you are right now but I'm hoping
[36:35] against all hope that you are here with me
in upper right. I know I'm there and I'm the
[36:40] person who's the--I'm the person who's generating
the most energy. So, it would be hard for
[36:46] you to be depressed with me running around
like a chicken with my head cutoff trying
[36:51] to entertain you. So the recovery zone is
not a place where you spend much time, is
[36:56] it? Because the recovery zone from your perspective
is the sign that you are a slacker, that's
[37:03] where people go to slack. When are you supposed
to be in the recovery zone? Vacation, no,
[37:09] never, never. That's the modern world, never.
Who goes on vacation? How many people here
[37:17] went on a vacation in the last year and didn't
answer email during the vacation? Well that's
[37:22] pretty good so--but that's only 6 percent
of the room and that's probably about accurate,
[37:26] right? Okay. So the recovery zone gets no
respect. The recovery zone gets no respect
[37:33] and the biggest--the biggest insight in some
ways that I'm going to be able to share with
[37:38] you today is an insight that has to do with
shifting the locus or the movement that characterizes
[37:47] your day in terms of energy states. So right
now what we know is--right now what we know
[37:53] is that in the course of the day, depending
on what happens, you end up being pulled reactively
[37:59] into this zone by certain events. I'm I--were
we on that page together? Okay. So all day
[38:05] long depending on how well or badly the day
goes, you have some movement between these
[38:10] two zones that it gets overwhelming, you end
up down in this zone. This zone is off limits.
[38:15] It's never even existed here at Google even
though there's plenty of reason for it to,
[38:19] you know, there are plenty of opportunities
for you to live there. Very people are spending
[38:23] a whole lot of time there. You laughed when
I said it. Now, what I'm going to suggest
[38:28] to you is a paradigm shift, a profound paradigm
shift in how you think about performance because
[38:35] what we learned is that the best movement
for you to be making in the course of the
[38:39] day is intermittently and intentionally between
upper right and lower right, because we are
[38:45] not designed as machines, we are rhythmic
beings and we are designed--we need to intermittently
[38:52] recover energy if want to sustain energy at
the highest level. And that brings me to the
[38:57] second principle that in order for us to sustain
performance, we need to learn to balance the
[39:02] expenditure of energy with the intermittent
renewal of energy. That's a pretty radical
[39:07] notion. Nobody is thinking that it really
is performance, valuable for your performance
[39:14] to build true renewal intermittently throughout
the day. We learned it. I'll take your question
[39:21] when we're done. We learned it from athletes.
We learned it from athletes because we consistently
[39:26] found that the greatest athletes understood
something called work-rest ratios. They valued
[39:32] the recovery of energy as much as they valued
the expenditure of energy. They--that's what
[39:38] interval training is all about. That's what
periodization is all about. It's the recognition
[39:44] that you need to, in order to be a great performer,
train your capacity for recovery as systematically
[39:51] as you train any skill that you have in your
life. Recovery is performance specific. It
[39:58] affects your ability to perform at a high-level
and to perform at a level of high-quality.
[40:05] Now, the current style in which most of us
operate is this style. We go between flat
[40:13] out and flat out. We've got two gears and
we don't spend anytime in either one. We get
[40:19] to this gear when we've gone flat out for
so long that we simply collapse. What I'm
[40:25] suggesting to you is that we want to build
a very different movement into our lives not
[40:32] only for the purposes of performing well but
for the purposes of having a life. Now, here's
[40:38] the counter-intuitive notion. Imagine the
Indianapolis 500 for a moment and the drivers
[40:45] who were driving and then I ask you this question,
is the driver who wins that raise, the driver
[40:50] who drives the fastest for the longest the
most continuously? And the answer, since I
[40:59] have gotten it immediately in time in short
is no, no. The driver who wins is the driver
[41:05] who drives the fastest for the longest when
he's driving and recovers the most efficiently
[41:11] when he's not. What is recovery? It's a pit
stop. What do you in the pit stop? In the
[41:16] pit stop, you refuel the tank; you do maintenance
on the car. If you're effective at that, that's
[41:22] a key ingredient and being able to be successful
in the raise. The average amount of time changing
[41:28] four tires in the pit and changing sometimes
the windshield wipers, filling the gas, how
[41:34] much time is that spent in the pit on average
for a driver? Fifteen seconds is about right.
[41:43] Because these people have trained recovery,
the pit crews are in fabulous physical shape.
[41:48] They are geniuses at ensuring effective recovery;
the higher the demand in your life, the more
[41:55] the need for renewal. If you are driving in
a high-performance car, you've got to drive,
[42:00] refuel and maintain that car more frequently.
If you are a high-performance human being,
[42:05] you need to refuel and maintain more quickly,
I mean, more regularly. But here's the deal,
[42:12] it's not the quantity of your recovery that
matters, it's the quality of your recovery
[42:16] that matters. It's how well you recover not
how long you recover, just as it's not how
[42:21] many hours you work, it's what you get done
in the hours that you work. That's why we
[42:26] want to train recovery. This is the way we're
currently recovering, "I try to keep my coffee
[42:31] buzz going till the Martini buzz kicks in."
We use artificial stimulants to push us up.
[42:38] We use artificial stimulants to pull us down.
If you could take control of this, it would
[42:44] give you a quality of energy and a quantity
of energy that was very different. What we
[42:49] want is the performance pulse. And that's
grounded in this notion that we are oscillatory
[42:55] beings in an oscillatory universe. Why do
I say that? Because I like the way it sounds.
[43:07] That's what it is. It means we have rhythms.
What are the rhythms of our body? Which organs
[43:12] are rhythmic in our body? Which bodily systems
are rhythmic? The heart. Heart rate goes up
[43:20] and down. A great measure of your heart health
is what's called heart rate variability. The
[43:24] ability to move flexibly up and down in heart
rate depending on the demand, what else? Breath.
[43:31] Your lungs and your heart, your muscles are
meant to contract and then after the stress
[43:38] is over to relax if they don't, you get back
pain, and neck pain, and knee pain and all
[43:42] those things that you come up with structural
explanations for that have nothing to do with
[43:47] anything except the fact that you are not
creating the right rhythm in your life. You
[43:52] said the right answer. Every system in the
body pulses starting with the cells, every
[43:58] system until somebody shows it's not through
pulses, but we try to live linear lives. We
[44:04] tried to live a life that goes in direct opposition
the way the body is meant to function. What
[44:09] we want to do is create an alignment with
our own rhythms, not with the rhythms of the
[44:15] computers you are using. They're designed
to spend energy in a linear continuous way
[44:20] but you are not. So, not only--it's not only
true that--it's not only true that you have
[44:33] a need to recover but you have a need to recover
in a very particular way. The circadian rhythm
[44:41] is this 24-hour rhythm and by the way it's
another rhythm of day or night that exists
[44:45] in the universe. At night you're meant to
be asleep. In the day you're meant to be awake.
[44:49] You're meant to move between the expenditure
of energy and then the recovery of energy.
[44:53] We all know about that even though we violated
at great cost to ourselves. Because I can't
[44:59] go into the fierce costs of not getting enough
sleep in this talk, I invite you again to
[45:05] go on our website where we put on the homepage,
the 60 minutes piece about sleep that ran
[45:10] two or three weeks ago. It that doesn't shock
you into sleeping more, making sleep more
[45:15] important, nothing I say will be able to do
it. Having said that, it's also important
[45:21] during the day. At night we've got a thing
called the basic rest activity cycle which
[45:26] means you sleep, you go from a light stage
of sleep, rapid eye movement, down slowly
[45:34] into a deep delta sleep over a period of 90
to a 120 minutes all through the night. If
[45:40] you go through that cycle completely, you're
getting a good period of sleep. If you get
[45:44] woken up in the middle of it, it interrupts
the quality of your sleep. Now, what's so
[45:48] fascinating is that exist during the day too
at a higher stake of physiological arousal?
[45:54] In other words, every 90 to 120 minutes we
move from a high state of physiological arousal
[45:59] slowly down as you're moving right now into
a physiological drop. At the end of 90 minutes,
[46:05] 120 minutes if it's a really high, if you're
in a low demand situation, but in that 90
[46:10] to 120 minute window, your body is screaming
at you, give me a break. But you override
[46:17] it. You override it with coffee; you override
it with diet coke; you override it with most
[46:22] of all cortisol, adrenalin, and noradrenalin
with your body's own speed. You override it
[46:28] by going into the upper left quadrant. You
override it by forcing stimulants through
[46:35] your body that are not serving you well. So
what we really want to do to perform at our
[46:41] best is to build a rhythmic relationship throughout
the day where when you're working, I'm sorry,
[46:47] when you're engaged, you're truly engaged;
and when you're disengaged, you're truly disengaged
[46:52] and you're not living in the gray zone in
between. Because when it comes to recovery,
[46:58] the more you train recovery, the better you
get at it, so it's not a notion of 90 minutes
[47:05] on and 90 minutes off, right? Fitness is defined
as the speed of recovery. The fitter you are,
[47:11] the faster you recover. The more you train
yourself to recover, the better you get at
[47:17] it, the quicker you will recover. We're talking
about sustainable high performance. We're
[47:22] talking about the ability to meet very high
demand. These are the scientific well-researched
[47:29] pieces of core evidence that suggest what
it takes to show up everyday here with all
[47:35] that you've got. I'm going to skip that slide.
And I'm going to say to you that we want to
[47:40] move between currently what's happening in
our lives. If you wanted to take away a visual
[47:45] image to remember, moving all day, as I said
just a few moments ago, between this upper
[47:49] right and upper left zone, reactively in the
face of demand. One of the reasons we move
[47:55] there is we ran out of energy. When you get
more tired, you get more irritable, you get
[47:58] more frustrated, you get more anxious. What
you really want to do in your life is you
[48:03] want to move to this intentional way of managing
your energy so that every 90 to a 120 minutes,
[48:10] what you're doing is you're renewing energy.
This is the paradigm shift. Right now, you
[48:16] live life, most of you, as if you're in a
marathon. Meaning, there is a long race out
[48:21] ahead, there is no end in sight and so either
consciously or unconsciously you pace yourself.
[48:28] You pace yourself by not fully engaging at
any given time in almost anything because
[48:35] if you try to push yourself as hard as you're
capable of pushing yourself for an expanded
[48:41] period of time, you drop like a stone. So
instead of doing that, you find ways to cheat
[48:47] on the engagement and expenditure of energy,
sometimes aware that you're doing it, sometimes
[48:52] not. I'm suggesting to you a really radical
idea. Reinvent yourself as a sprinter. What
[48:58] is a sprinter? A sprinter comes up to the
line, gets down in the crouch, looks down
[49:03] to the end of the race, a 100 yards, 200 yards,
400 yards and says, can I fully expand, can
[49:10] I bring a hundred percent engagement to this
race. And what is the sprinter answer? You
[49:15] bet your life, why? Because there's an end
line, because there's a finish line, because
[49:22] they know that they could do it for a finite
period of time, stop and recover. The same
[49:28] is true for you if you make it so. You've
lost the finish lines in your life. You've
[49:33] lost the boundaries. You've lost the stopping
points. You live in a state of perpetual and
[49:39] I'm accusing you, I apologize for that, many
of you do. Many of you do and we're all inclined
[49:46] in this way because everything is pushing
us in this way. So, we live in this state
[49:50] in which we are never setting stopping points.
And instead the very things that allow us
[50:01] to be connected all the time make it virtually
impossible to be disconnected ever; and you
[50:07] know what I'm talking about. Here is the deal,
how many people in the room would say that
[50:14] based on what I've said so far, what I'm saying
as a way of thinking about how you operate,
[50:22] about how you perform makes fundamental sense
to you? It makes sense. Okay, how many of
[50:30] you based on what I've told you would say
that you're going to walk out of this room
[50:35] and starting today, based on what I've told
you, you aren't going to fundamentally make
[50:39] some changes in your life that are in accordance
with everything I've said and please be honest?
[50:45] So, we're at two or three, okay? So why not?
It's not my fault. Let me tell you that first.
[50:52] It's not my fault. The reason that you're
not going to is because we're creatures of
[50:56] habit. Because what you did yesterday is what
you're going to do today and do again tomorrow.
[51:01] We are remarkably automatic creatures. We
need to take this into account when we're
[51:06] making change in our life. We need to recognize
that our prefrontal cortex, our conscious
[51:11] thinking is not the best way to make change.
What we need to do instead is we need to co-op
[51:16] the autonomic nervous system. We need to co-op
the part of our physiology that gets things
[51:22] done automatically by training our self through
regular repetition to do the things so that
[51:31] it shows up without our having to think about
it. That's the final energy management principle.
[51:36] To manage your energy more optimally, you
have to build what we call positive rituals.
[51:40] These are highly specific behaviors that become
automatic over time. So what I'm suggesting
[51:46] to you is that you think about, when you leave
here today, you think about one of those answers
[51:53] on that energy audit that upsets you, that
makes you recognize it's incurring or creating
[52:00] a really high cost in your life. And think
about what could I do to ritualize a change
[52:07] of behavior that would make it possible for
me to get a "no" answer to that question I
[52:12] have a "yes" answer too. So, if were something
like working out for example, I want to give
[52:17] you a very simple example, and you said to
me, "Tony, I'm so inspired by what you said,
[52:21] I realized that working out would not only
be good for my physical energy but it would
[52:25] be a great thing for my emotional and my energy
and for my focus. I'm all with you. I'm going
[52:29] to start doing it tomorrow and I'm going to
do it three days a week from now on." What
[52:33] are the odds you're going to succeed? Very
low, why, it's not specific enough, it's not
[52:39] precise enough. When are you going to do it?
You're not going to do it if you don't set
[52:43] a time because you've already got tons of
things to do and you're going to default right
[52:47] back into them under any kind of pressure.
The only way you're going to do it is if you
[52:52] take something out of your life that is currently
in that slot by designating that time as surely
[52:58] as you designate important meeting here at
Google. So, if you now say to me, "Tony, I'm
[53:02] going to work out Monday, Wednesday, and Friday
7:00 a.m. I'm going to wake up at 6:45. I've
[53:08] got a gym down the street for me. I'm going
to set out my clothes the night before in
[53:13] order to do that. I'm going to do cardiovascular
for 30 minutes on Mondays and Wednesday. I'm
[53:17] going to do strength training for 30 minutes
on Friday." Now, you're talking turkey. And
[53:22] here's what happens, you know, it's a ritual
when you've done it for long enough that when
[53:27] you don't do it, it feels worse than it does
to use the energy to do it. And any of you
[53:32] who is--who are working out now, regularly,
know what I'm talking about. That--it isn't
[53:37] necessarily easy to work out and there are
many times when you might not feel like working
[53:42] out, but if you don't do it, you feel worse.
That is what the ritual is about. I wish we
[53:46] had the time to be able to, actually, build
in this room some rituals but we will have
[53:51] this workshop that will intermittently be
offered at Google and you'll have the opportunity
[53:56] to really come in and do this work if it interests
you. For the moment, what I want to suggest
[54:03] is that you take a shot at building a ritual,
because you can have your first experience
[54:09] without me and without much more description.
Take in the next hour, because if you wait
[54:16] more than an hour, your motivation is going
to go down. So if you take it in the next
[54:20] hour, and look for a way to define a ritual
that's highly specific in time, highly specific
[54:27] in the behavior itself, and that is doable;
that is biting all something you could chew.
[54:34] If you're not working out at all, for example,
don't build in five workouts a week of 30
[54:39] minutes of running. Walk, Monday, Wednesday,
and Friday for 15 minutes in the middle of
[54:44] the day. That's also a recovery break. Here's
the deal, it's about taking control of your
[54:51] life. You think that your life is, you're
at the mercy of a lot of other forces but
[54:55] you have the capacity to seize it back. And
that's what I want to leave you with the message
[55:00] to do, to begin to seize it back because it
belongs to you. Thank you very much.
[55:11] I would be happy to take a few questions.
>> WITTENBERG: We have time for a few questions,
[55:20] if anybody has something, come on up to the
mic. You're all too busy in time for your
[55:33] rituals?
>> SCHWARTZ: Yeah.
[55:34] >> WITTENBERG: Would you mind walking up to
the light?
[55:35] >> FEMALE: Could you give us some examples
of rituals?
[55:36] >> WITTENBERG: An example of a ritual.
>> SCHWARTZ: An example of a ritual, well,
[55:37] I gave you an example to physical ritual.
An example of an emotional ritual that we
[55:41] found is very powerful is what do you want
to do emotionally? What you do want to do
[55:45] emotionally is you want to drive as much positive
energy into your reservoir as you can because
[55:50] we default to negative emotions. It's the
way we're constructed biologically. So, the
[55:55] more, the more positive energy you have in
the system the better off you are. So what
[55:59] behaviors could influence your ability to
have more positive emotion at you're disposal
[56:06] particularly under the pressure? Well, an
example--a couple of examples we have are,
[56:11] writing a note of appreciation to someone
in your life who you think deserves a recognition
[56:17] they're not getting enough of turns out to
be something that as a remarkably, powerful
[56:22] effect on the other person but also on you.
And so, one ritual might be, to take once
[56:28] or twice a week where you write a note to
someone. A second emotional ritual might be
[56:32] to, to take it at the very end of the day
before you go to sleep or as you're about
[56:38] to leave, to take a little inventory, maybe
in a journal or a notebook of what's right
[56:43] in my life. What are three things that are
write in my life right now? Because it's a
[56:47] technology of injecting the right fuel into
your life. A mental ritual might be something
[56:53] like, doing the most important thing first
in the morning. Making the first 90 minutes
[56:58] of you day everyday or the first 60 minutes
an activity that is, from your perspective,
[57:04] the one that would provide or create the greatest
value over the course of the rest of the day,
[57:09] and making that the most important thing you
do, instead of, answering your email first
[57:13] and being in reactive mode, being at the mercy
of somebody else's agenda, making that the
[57:18] most important thing. Making it specific in
time, planning it the night before is what
[57:25] makes it possible to move from an intention
into a habit.
[57:28] >> MALE: Sir, I just wanted to see if you'd
share the example from your book about your
[57:34] work with the tennis players, about trying
to find the difference between the top few
[57:37] tennis players in the world...
>> SCHWARTZ: Yeah, I'll tell you this very,
[57:39] very quickly. It's the slide I skipped. God
bless you. You can't get away with anything
[57:46] at Google. What we discovered, when we really
discovered the power of renewal was when we
[57:51] were watching tennis players, trying to understand
what made the difference between the great
[57:55] players and the next set of players because
we were working with many of the top 200.
[58:00] And it was very hard to see from when they
were playing what the difference was. One
[58:04] day, we were watching--my former partner and
I--actually, my former partner was watching
[58:10] the top--he was watching two top players on
the same court and what he'd noticed was,
[58:14] a man named Jim Layer, what he noticed was
that between points, these two players were
[58:19] doing the exact same set of four sequenced
activities. Neither of them was aware that
[58:24] they were doing it themselves much less that
the other one was doing it. What they were
[58:28] accomplishing and what you were asking about
was renewal. What they were doing was they
[58:32] were systematically using the 20 to 30 seconds
between points to refuel their bodies. They
[58:39] were doing it by first, turning away from
the net so that they left the point behind
[58:44] them, switching the racket from the dominant
to the non-dominant hands so they allowed
[58:48] the arm to relax, starting to play with the
strings of the rackets so that they could
[58:53] keep their attention narrowly focused on the
task at hand, and walking in a way that we
[58:58] came to call the "peacock walk" which is to
walk like this. Because how you hold yourself
[59:04] influences how you feel. So if you feel better,
obviously, you are in a position to perform
[59:10] better. So, those four sequenced set of activities
led to heart rate drop when we started measuring
[59:17] it of somewhere around one heartbeat per second.
So, the great players were getting 20 to 30
[59:23] heartbeats of recovery between every point
and the players who weren't doing this sequenced
[59:29] set of recovery activities were getting virtually
none.
[59:32] >> MALE: So, your points are very well-taken.
But somewhere along the line you made an assumption
[59:39] that I don't quite agree with. You're assuming
that we're oscillating between the high energy,
[59:44] between positive and negative feelings whereas
I think we're actually--I find myself oscillating
[59:49] between the high and low energy. So I'm going
to go to lunch afterwards, and after lunch,
[59:53] I'm going to have this post-lunch low and
I'm not going to feel negative feelings towards
[59:57] people. I'm just going to feel, sort of, tired
and wanting to sleep.
[60:00] >> SCHWARTZ: Yeah, and--you know, I can tell
you that if you learn to manage your energy
[60:05] more skillfully and build recovery periods
starting an hour and a half after you first
[60:14] get to work, and work intensely, and then,
consciously and intentionally recover effectively,
[60:22] the recovery will mean that you won't come
out of lunch with the afternoon law. How do
[60:26] I know that? I know that 'cause it doesn't
happen to me. I know that because I used to
[60:30] be dead tired in the afternoon. Now, you can't
overcome the core physiology so you are going
[60:36] to be more tired at 2:30 or 3:00 trying to
do a task than you would at 10:00, which is
[60:40] why you ought to be doing the high demand
kinds of activities, the really complex activities
[60:45] earlier in the day or pass that circadian
trough. But, I will promise you that you will
[60:53] get a much more even availability of energy
if you more regularly and intermittently build
[61:00] in periods of recovery.
>> WITTENBERG: So, that's all the time we
[61:03] have. Tony will be up here for questions after
and we're also going to go to lunch. So anybody
[61:07] who'd like to join Tony for lunch, please
come up here afterwards. And let's thank Tony
[61:12] so much for his time here.