Tony Schwartz Tells Google Staff Energy Renewal Beats Longer Hours

The Energy Project | Tony Schwartz | Talks at Google — Talks at Google

Talks at Google

Investing extra hours fails to solve rising workplace demand because time is finite, requiring workers to alternate 90-minute focus sprints with disciplined recovery rituals to expand biological capacity.

AI-assisted summary of The Energy Project | Tony Schwartz | Talks at Google — original source. Check the original for full context.

Source published:

Key ideas

  • Human biological capacity naturally peaks at age 30 and deteriorates without proactive intervention, creating a growing capacity deficit as career and life demands escalate. (4:06)
  • Time is an unyielding, finite resource of 168 hours per week, meaning sustainable high performance requires managing renewable energy rather than investing more time. (6:51)
  • Human physiology operates on 90- to 120-minute ultradian cycles during the day; failing to take intermittent recovery breaks triggers toxic fight-or-flight hormones that shut down the prefrontal cortex. (42:49)
  • Elite performers treat rest as a trained discipline, exemplified by top-200 tennis players whose 20-to-30-second between-point rituals systematically lower their heart rates by roughly one beat per second. (58:24)

Detailed notes

## Background Published by the Talks at Google channel on YouTube on May 7, 2008, this presentation features Tony Schwartz speaking at Google's Mountain View headquarters as part of the Leading@Google speaker series. The session covers how escalating workplace demands outpace human capacity and outlines Schwartz's framework for systematically expanding and renewing physical, emotional, mental, and spiritual energy rather than relying solely on the finite resource of time.

## TL;DR Tony Schwartz argues that attempting to meet relentlessly rising workplace demands by investing more time is biologically unsustainable, requiring professionals to shift their focus to managing renewable energy. Human performance rests upon four interconnected dimensions: physical capacity, emotional quality, mental focus, and spiritual purpose. Schwartz demonstrates that modern workers habitually trap themselves in high-stress survival states and chronic distraction, running flat-out until burning out. Drawing lessons from the recovery rituals of elite athletes and ultradian biological rhythms, he urges knowledge workers to operate like sprinters by alternating 90- to 120-minute intervals of deep focus with intentional renewal breaks.

## Atmosphere & style The presentation is brisk, candid, and intellectually sharp, blending rigorous physiological data with playful, self-deprecating humor. Schwartz commands the stage with restless physical energy, playfully chiding the tech-centric audience about their multi-tasking illusions, BlackBerry addictions, and cultural aversion to genuine rest. The room shifts from nervous chuckles during an eye-opening 16-question energy audit to contemplative quiet as attendees confront their collective depletion, ultimately closing on an empowering and pragmatic call to build sustainable daily rituals.

## Bulletin - [04:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=246s) Human biological capacity naturally peaks at age 30 and deteriorates without proactive intervention, creating a growing capacity deficit as career and life demands escalate. - [06:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=411s) Time is an unyielding, finite resource of 168 hours per week, meaning sustainable high performance requires managing renewable energy rather than investing more time. - [42:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=2569s) Human physiology operates on 90- to 120-minute ultradian cycles during the day; failing to take intermittent recovery breaks triggers toxic fight-or-flight hormones that shut down the prefrontal cortex. - [58:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=3504s) Elite performers treat rest as a trained discipline, exemplified by top-200 tennis players whose 20-to-30-second between-point rituals systematically lower their heart rates by roughly one beat per second.

## Key takeaways - [01:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=111s) Leadership capability is grounded in personal character and self-development, beginning with the physical body and energetic capacity. - [04:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=246s) Natural physical capacity peaks at age 30, after which the human body naturally loses one-half pound of lean muscle per year unless actively countered. - [09:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=546s) While competency reflects skills and knowledge, capacity serves as the foundational energy reservoir required to activate those competencies under pressure. - [11:17](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=677s) Human energy operates across four interconnected tiers: physical quantity, emotional quality, mental focus, and spiritual purpose. - [14:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=843s) Fragmented attention carries severe cognitive penalties, as entering demanding mental tasks requires a three-to-eight-minute warmup phase that frequent interruptions continuously abort. - [16:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=1005s) The energy of the human spirit serves as the foundational 'Why' that aligns daily actions with personal core values and fuels resilience across the other three energy tiers. - [28:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=1710s) Operating in the high-negative 'Survival Zone' floods the body with adrenaline and cortisol, shifting blood away from the prefrontal cortex and crippling analytical thinking. - [32:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=1928s) Chronic exposure to prolonged cortisol turns it toxic, contributing to major illnesses while emotional stress spreads contagiously to colleagues and teams. - [35:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=2113s) Corporate culture systematically undervalues the 'Recovery Zone', resulting in workers perpetually bouncing between high performance and reactive survival until collapsing into burnout. - [38:28](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=2308s) Like an Indianapolis 500 race, sustaining peak performance depends on executing disciplined, rapid recovery pit stops rather than running continuously flat-out. - [42:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=2569s) Waking performance is governed by ultradian cycles (the Basic Rest-Activity Cycle), requiring deliberate disengagement every 90 to 120 minutes rather than masking dips with stimulants. - [47:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=2831s) Workers must transition from an endless marathon mindset to that of a sprinter, expending maximum energy across defined intervals bounded by intentional renewal. - [50:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=3011s) Sustainable behavioral change relies on establishing automatic positive rituals with precise scheduling and low friction, rather than counting on finite prefrontal willpower. - [55:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=3311s) Dedicating the first 60 to 90 minutes of the workday to high-leverage priorities shields cognitive focus from the reactive trap of incoming email. - [58:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=3504s) World-class tennis players use structured physical routines between points—turning away, switching hands, adjusting strings, and walking upright—to drop heart rates by 20 to 30 beats before the next serve. - [59:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=3572s) Building recovery intervals throughout the morning significantly blunts the biological afternoon circadian slump, stabilizing energy across the entire day.

## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=0s) Introduction by Evan Wittenberg

Evan Wittenberg from Google University’s leadership development and people management group welcomes the audience to the Leading@Google speaker series. He introduces Tony Schwartz, the founder, president, and CEO of The Energy Project, an organization centered on managing energy rather than time to optimize performance at work, at home, and in life. Wittenberg recounts Schwartz's career trajectory, beginning in journalism as a reporter for *The New York Times*, an associate editor at *Newsweek*, a staff writer for *New York* and *Esquire* magazines, and a columnist for *Fast Company*. Wittenberg also points out a humorous credential from his past: co-authoring the number-one international bestseller *The Art of the Deal* with Donald Trump, noting that audience members can ask him later for his opinions on Trump. He highlights Schwartz's book *What Really Matters: Searching for Wisdom in America* and the core philosophy of his talk—achieving greater effectiveness through energy management.

Wittenberg notes that Google has already piloted a two-day version of Schwartz's course, asking participants in the room to raise their hands. Before yielding the floor, Wittenberg issues a specific ground rule requested by Schwartz based on his book *The Power of Full Engagement*: attendees must close their laptops unless actively taking notes. He explains that the human brain cannot multitask, despite the illusions people maintain, and expresses hope that the presentation will keep everyone engaged enough to ignore their laptops and BlackBerry devices until the closing Q&A session.

[01:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=111s) The Foundation of Leadership and Self-Development

Tony Schwartz takes the stage and traces the origin of his work to a personal quest that began during his teenage years. While his peers pursued conventional teenage activities, Schwartz found himself consumed by questions about what made a meaningful life, driven by a desire to become a happier, more fulfilled person while growing up in what he describes as a difficult New York Jewish family. Over decades, that introspective search expanded into investigating human potential: what allows an individual to continuously develop a richer, deeper version of themselves over a lifetime.

Schwartz acknowledges that while his work is ostensibly marketed to help corporate organizations enhance productivity and assist individuals in becoming better leaders, its actual core is personal development. He draws a firm line connecting character and leadership:

> “But you can't be a great leader if you're not a great human being.”

He explains that true leadership begins with working on oneself. Although the talk focuses heavily on the physical realm—because everything fundamentally starts with the body—he notes that this is merely the base of a much broader framework that governs a person's capacity to show up fully in every area of life.

[04:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=246s) The Widening Gap Between Demand and Capacity

Schwartz explains that the primary reason organizations invite him to consult is an escalating structural crisis: the divergence between demand and capacity. From birth, a human being faces relatively little external demand, though children voice plenty of demands of their own. Over time, life's demands steadily increase in modern society, continuing on an upward trajectory until death. Human capacity, on the other hand, follows a natural physiological arc. In the absence of conscious and deliberate personal intervention, natural physical capacity increases until it reaches a biological peak.

Schwartz asks the Google audience to guess the age at which that natural capacity peaks. When an audience member shouts out forty-five, Schwartz corrects him: natural capacity peaks at age thirty. He jokes that for the relatively young Google demographic, thirty might still lie in the future, but warns that biological realities arrive regardless. After thirty, physiological capacity steadily deteriorates without active counter-measures.

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: Demand versus Capacity Over a Lifespan accDescr: Diagram illustrating the widening gap as demand steadily climbs while natural capacity peaks at age 30 and declines.

subgraph S1["Demand Trajectory"] D1["Birth: Low Demand"] --> D2["Adulthood: High Demand"] --> D3["Modern Work: Relentlessly Rising"] end

subgraph S2["Natural Capacity Trajectory"] C1["Early Development"] --> C2["Age 30: Natural Peak"] --> C3["Post-30: Natural Decline<br>(-0.5 lb lean muscle/yr)"] end

D3 -.->|"Creates Growing Deficit"| GAP["The Capacity Gap<br>(Houston, we have a problem)"] C3 -.->|"Fails to Keep Pace"| GAP ```

Schwartz surveys the room with three targeted questions that reveal the core dilemma: - When asked if the demands over the past two to three years were the highest in their lives, the audience overwhelmingly agrees. - When asked if anyone expects their workload and life demands to decrease over the coming year after fighting so hard to reach Google, the audience remains skeptical. - When asked how many people believe their internal capacity will naturally rise to keep pace with that escalating demand, virtually no hands go up.

Summing up the dilemma, Schwartz quipped, “Houston, we got a problem.”

- From age 30 onward, the human body naturally loses one-half pound of lean muscle mass every single year without proactive intervention.

[06:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=411s) Time vs. Energy as Resources

To survive mounting workloads, most professionals instinctively rely on a single primary lever: time. When demand spikes, people throw more hours at the problem. Schwartz observes that even forward-thinking, perk-rich companies like Google evaluate employees to a significant degree based on perceived time investment and visibility. However, this strategy quickly hits a hard biological ceiling.

Schwartz jokingly asks whether anyone in the room would like advice on what to do with their abundant free hours. With personal schedules already pushed to the brink, time proves to be an entirely finite currency. A week contains exactly 168 hours, and none can be manufactured or recovered once spent. Schwartz stresses that time is external and moves past like a train, disappearing forever. Because no extra hours exist, the only sustainable way to meet expanding demand in an increasingly complex world is to get more accomplished in less time. Doing so requires shifting focus to an internal, renewable resource: human energy. Unlike time, energy can be systematically expanded and regularly renewed.

[09:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=546s) Redefining Energy and Capacity vs. Competency

Addressing corporate skepticism toward the word "energy," Schwartz points out that while minutes and hours are easily measured on a spreadsheet, energy is often viewed as subjective and soft. He grounds his framework in the basic physics definition:

> “Energy is the capacity to do work.”

If energy equates to capacity, building a person's energy reservoir directly expands their capacity to handle work. Schwartz distinguishes between competency and capacity. Googlers are hired because of world-class intelligence, skills, and competencies, yet competency remains useless without the underlying capacity to fuel it. Capacity provides the energetic foundation that activates skills and talent. When individuals try to run on empty—suffering from sleep deprivation, poor nutrition, emotional turmoil, fractured concentration, or depleted passion—their abilities falter under pressure. Just as a vehicle requires a fuel source to run, humans require energy systems, leading Schwartz into the distinct dimensions of energy that power high performance.

[11:17](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=677s) The Foundation of Physical Energy and Daytime Renewal

Tony Schwartz explains that unlike machines, which rely on a single energy source, human beings operate on a complex, multidimensional system of four distinct energy sources: physical, emotional, mental, and spiritual. Each source is necessary, none is sufficient on its own, and they deeply influence one another. While people can get by utilizing only one or two dimensions, operating at one's personal best requires all four. Schwartz notes that the physical dimension serves as the foundational base upon which all other capacities rest, arguing: “If you don't have sufficient physical energy, is it going to influence your focus of attention?” In workplace and school environments alike, this physical foundation is routinely discounted and neglected unless someone happens to be competing on a varsity sports team.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: The Four Dimensions of Human Energy accDescr: Diagram showing the four multidimensional human energy sources arranged from the foundational physical layer up to spirit.

subgraph Spirit["Spiritual Capacity (Purpose)"] S["The 'Why': Alignment of values and life purpose"] end

subgraph Mental["Mental Capacity (Focus)"] M["Focus of attention and absorption on one task"] end

subgraph Emotional["Emotional Capacity (Quality)"] E["Quality of energy and emotional state under pressure"] end

subgraph Physical["Physical Capacity (Quantity)"] P1["Nutrition: Sustaining glucose"] P2["Fitness: Transporting oxygen"] P3["Sleep: Deep nocturnal rest"] P4["Renewal: Daytime recovery rhythms"] end

Physical --> Emotional Emotional --> Mental Mental --> Spirit ```

Schwartz breaks physical capacity down into four primary elements: nutrition, fitness, sleep, and daytime renewal. Nutrition governs how the body sustains and moves glucose, while fitness dictates how efficiently oxygen is transported through the system. Sleep requires both sufficient hours and adequate depth. However, the most overlooked component is daytime renewal—intermittent recovery between expenditures of energy. Human physiology is not designed to function linearly like an engine; it is biologically wired to sleep twice, requiring a longer period at night and a short dip in the afternoon. Schwartz stresses that sustainable performance demands moving rhythmically between expending energy and renewing it throughout the day.

- **Nutrition:** The capacity to stabilize and manage blood glucose levels consistently. - **Fitness:** Cardiovascular health and strength that govern oxygen transportation throughout the body. - **Sleep:** Deep, restorative nocturnal sleep lasting seven to eight hours. - **Daytime Recovery:** Honoring natural ultradian rhythms through brief, intermittent renewal breaks rather than working continuously without pausing.

---

[14:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=843s) Emotional Quality, Mental Focus, and the High Cost of Distraction

Moving above the physical base, Schwartz introduces emotional energy—the quality of energy—which is defined by how a person feels. How people feel profoundly impacts their leadership, performance, and collaboration, with specific emotional states directly fueling sustainable high performance. He then addresses mental energy, which represents the focus of energy. Joking with the audience about the event host Evan’s earlier plea for attendees to shut their laptops and put away their BlackBerrys, Schwartz teases that seeing people distracted makes him feel unloved. On a serious note, he emphasizes that human beings produce their deepest and most effective work when focusing on one thing at a time, a truth recognized for millennia by contemplative traditions.

Schwartz points out that modern technology and corporate habits have decimated single-task focus. While jokingly pointing the finger at Google for creating countless opportunities to fracture human attention, he emphasizes that chronic distraction exacts an extraordinary toll on both productivity and depth of thought. He compares entering a demanding mental task to going for a run: during the first two to five minutes of a run, muscles feel tight, breathing is labored, and rhythm has not yet kicked in. Mental tasks follow the exact same ramp-up curve, requiring three to eight minutes before the mind slips into genuine absorption. When workers constantly interrupt themselves, they perpetually abort this warmup phase. In modern American corporate culture, people average only eleven minutes on a single task before pivoting, and during those brief eleven minutes, they break their own focus every three minutes.

> “The work we do around this dimension and the importance of it is that for thousands of years it has been understood that we do our most effective work when we focus on one thing at a time.” — Tony Schwartz

---

[16:45](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=1005s) The Energy of the Human Spirit and the Power of "Why"

The fourth dimension, which Schwartz describes as sounding the softest but often proving the most potent, is the energy of the human spirit. This spiritual capacity is not defined dogmatically; rather, it represents the energy derived from a clear sense of purpose and an authentic alignment between what a person claims to value and how they actually conduct their daily life. The closer that alignment is, the richer the reservoir of energy available. Schwartz terms this dimension the fundamental "Why" behind human activity, contrasting it with the physical, emotional, and mental dimensions, which serve as the tactical "Hows."

When an individual's sense of purpose is firmly anchored, it acts as a catalytic force multiplying the other three tiers of energy. Schwartz explains that tapping into authentic personal purpose directly enhances emotional resilience, cognitive focus, and physical endurance under stress. If all four energy sources are operational, an individual possesses the capacity to fire on all cylinders. He then challenges the room to consider how many people actually have these four sources dialed in and invites them to take a pencil and test their habits directly through a research-backed diagnostic.

> “In fact, this energy drives, this is the 'Why,' the others of the 'Hows.' This 'Why' energy drives your behavior at all the other level.” — Tony Schwartz

---

[17:47](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=1067s) The 16-Question Energy Audit

Schwartz guides the audience through a self-administered energy audit drawn from the research database hosted on his company's website, The Energy Project. He instructs everyone to place a check mark next to every item where their honest answer is "yes." In this diagnostic, every affirmative answer flags an energy deficit or poor renewal habit across the physical, emotional, mental, or spiritual dimensions:

| # | Diagnostic Statement | Primary Dimension | |:---|:---|:---| | 1 | I don't regularly get at least 7–8 hours of sleep, and I often wake up feeling tired. | Physical (Sleep) | | 2 | I frequently skip breakfast or settle for something that isn't particularly healthy. | Physical (Nutrition) | | 3 | I don't work out enough (at least 3x/week cardio and at least 1x/week strength training). | Physical (Fitness) | | 4 | I don't take regular daytime breaks to renew, and often eat lunch at my desk (if at all). | Physical (Renewal) | | 5 | I frequently feel irritable, impatient, or anxious at work, especially when demand is high. | Emotional | | 6 | I don't spend enough time with family/loved ones, and when with them, I'm not really present. | Emotional / Spirit | | 7 | I take too little time in my life for the activities that I most deeply enjoy. | Emotional | | 8 | I rarely stop to express appreciation to others or to celebrate accomplishments and blessings. | Emotional | | 9 | I have difficulty focusing on one thing at a time and am easily distracted, especially by email. | Mental | | 10 | I spend much of my time reacting to immediate demands rather than high-leverage activities. | Mental | | 11 | I don't take enough time for reflection, strategizing, or thinking creatively. | Mental | | 12 | I work evenings and/or weekends, and rarely take a vacation truly free of work. | Mental / Renewal | | 13 | I spend too little time at work doing what I do best and enjoy most. | Spirit | | 14 | Significant gaps exist between what I say is important in life and how I actually live. | Spirit | | 15 | My work decisions are influenced more by external demands than by my own purpose. | Spirit | | 16 | I don't invest enough positive time and energy in making a positive difference in the world. | Spirit |

As Schwartz reads through the statements, he quips that statement number nine—struggling with distraction and email—is an automatic "yes" for virtually every person in the room. He demands rigorous honesty on strict criteria, such as requiring both regular cardio and regular strength training to avoid checking statement three, and both expressing gratitude and celebrating wins to avoid checking statement eight.

---

[21:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=1281s) The Capacity Deficit: Numbness and Rationalization

As attendees finish totaling their checks, groans ripple through the audience, prompting one participant to call out that people are "cursing." Schwartz conducts a quick show of hands, asking how many checked eight or more statements. A sea of hands goes up across the auditorium. He remarks with dark humor that the good news is everyone has company, but the bad news is that having company means the entire group is deeply depleted. He then asks how many marked twelve or more, and hands remain raised. When he asks if anyone is happy with their score, one attendee mentions scoring five, which Schwartz acknowledges as extraordinarily low for corporate audiences, though even five affirmative marks represent significant compromises.

Schwartz puts the results into perspective: checking eight items implies that approximately 50 percent of an individual's potential human capacity is currently unavailable. This pervasive deficit exists because society takes human capacity entirely for granted, operating under the flawed assumption that when external demands escalate, personal capacity will miraculously expand on its own to meet them. Instead, unmanaged demand takes an aggressive physical, emotional, and spiritual toll, leaving professionals psychologically numbed to how compromised they truly are. Schwartz notes that while everyone has dozens of rationalizations explaining why they cannot prioritize these basic behaviors, the items on the audit are obvious fundamentals of a functioning life.

> “If you have eight 'yes' answers, think of it as 50 percent of the potential capacity available to you that is currently available to you.” — Tony Schwartz

[23:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=1407s) Confronting the Reality: The Energy Audit and the Four Quadrants

Tony Schwartz acknowledges that once people become conscious of habits that do not serve them, the instinctive human reaction is to make excuses. People say to themselves: “I am working really long hours. I got a long commute. I got obligations with my family. I've got other things I'd like to do. I can't do all these things, so get real.” But failing to address these habits takes an undeniable toll on both professional and personal lives. To help the audience confront these issues with complete honesty, Schwartz offers to distribute his energy audit through Google’s host, Evan, to anyone who leaves a business card, allowing them to track their progress over time.

He shifts to analyzing the practical consequences of having low energy capacity across the physical, emotional, mental, and spiritual dimensions. People generally experience four distinct energy states throughout the day, but only one serves peak performance. To map these states, Schwartz introduces a simple two-axis model: the vertical axis measures the quantity of energy from low to high, while the horizontal axis measures the quality of energy from negative to positive.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: The Four Energy Quadrants accDescr: A grid mapping energy quantity against energy quality into four performance zones.

subgraph HIGH["High Energy (Quantity)"] direction LR SZ["Survival Zone<br><b>High Negative</b><br>Fight or flight, anxious, defensive"] PZ["Performance Zone<br><b>High Positive</b><br>Energized, focused, exuberant"] end

subgraph LOW["Low Energy (Quantity)"] direction LR BZ["Burnout / Depletion<br><b>Low Negative</b><br>Exhausted, depressed, hopeless"] RZ["Renewal / Recovery<br><b>Low Positive</b><br>Relaxed, calm, peaceful"] end

SZ --- PZ BZ --- RZ ```

[25:38](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=1538s) The Upper-Right Quadrant: The Truth About Peak Performance

Schwartz asks the audience to call out adjectives describing how they feel when operating at their absolute best. Audience members respond with words like “aligned,” “happy,” “satisfied,” “fulfilled,” “energized,” “excited,” and “exuberant.” These emotions fall directly into the upper-right quadrant: high quantity and positive quality.

Schwartz explains that when his organization began studying high performers and professional athletes 25 years earlier, conventional sports psychology claimed that performing at one's best required a baseline of mild anxiety. When Schwartz and his team surveyed athletes directly, the response contradicted prevailing dogma: “If you're feeling anxious when you're actually performing, be guaranteed, you're not going to perform at your best.”

While no one in the audience is surprised that positive emotions drive optimal execution, Schwartz delivers the crucial catch: if you do not feel positive emotions, you cannot perform at your best. When he challenges the room on whether they actually spend the vast majority of their workday feeling confident, exuberant, and passionate, heads shake. That discrepancy exposes a major performance problem: working in other emotional states carries severe, often uncalculated costs.

[28:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=1710s) The Upper-Left Quadrant: The High Cost of the Survival Zone

Schwartz turns to the upper-left quadrant—the high-quantity, negative-quality state known as the *Survival Zone*. Evolutionarily, this state exists for a vital reason: survival during acute, life-threatening danger. When facing a predator like a mountain lion or escaping a fire, the body shifts from the parasympathetic to the sympathetic nervous system. The limbic system bypasses the prefrontal cortex because it recognizes threats instantly and triggers a rapid fight-or-flight response.

The physiological mechanics of this state directly undermine modern cognitive work: - Heart rate surges, muscles tense, and vision narrows. - Adrenaline, noradrenaline, and cortisol flood the bloodstream. - Blood diverts away from the prefrontal cortex and rushes into the extremities for fight or flight.

Schwartz highlights the absurdity of this reaction occurring at a desk: “The prefrontal cortex in true fight or flight when adrenaline and noradrenaline and cortisol flood through your body shuts down because you don't want it to be thinking.” When a boss yells, an unsolvable project problem stalls progress, or exhaustion breeds frustration, the body triggers that same primal threat response. With blood drained from the brain, analytical capacity collapses, reflective thought vanishes, and imaginative problem-solving becomes impossible.

[32:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=1928s) Contagious Stress, Burnout, and the Search for Recovery

Operating in the Survival Zone exacts severe costs beyond degraded immediate cognitive output. While cortisol is necessary for acute survival, prolonged circulation turns it toxic: “When it circulates for very long in your body, it becomes a toxin, a poison and it leads to virtually every, it has an impact on virtually every major illness and disease we know.”

Furthermore, energy is inherently contagious. For leaders, that emotional contagion is multiplied by their status. To illustrate emotional contagion, Schwartz jokes: “If you have any doubt that energy is contagious, when we're finished with this talk, let's go down together and walk in to the local Department of Motor Vehicles and see if your energy changes.” Conversely, an upbeat, smiling person greeting travelers in an airport security line instantly lifts everyone around them—the exact dynamic underlying great salesmanship.

Beyond health and social damage, the Survival Zone functions like a gas-guzzling car, rapidly draining reserves. When prolonged stress depletes high negative energy, individuals drop into the lower-left quadrant: low quantity, negative quality (the burnout or depletion zone). Schwartz notes that this zone carries a cultural taboo; when an audience member named Rachel raises her hand to acknowledge feeling this way at work, Schwartz jokes, “Rachel, put your hand down,” noting that people rarely admit to being burned out because it is seen as culturally unacceptable. Finally, Schwartz invites the room to identify the remaining lower-right quadrant (low quantity, positive quality), prompting suggestions such as “maintenance” and “resting.”

[35:13](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=2113s) The Disrespected Recovery Zone and Workplace Reality

Tony Schwartz quizzes the audience on how they spend their working hours across four energetic zones: Performance (upper right: high positive), Survival (upper left: high negative), Burnout (lower left: low negative), and Recovery (lower right: low positive). When he asks who actually spends non-performance time kicked back in the recovery zone versus survival or burnout, only about eight people out of a hundred raise their hands, while the rest stay silent. By process of elimination, Schwartz notes that whenever people fall out of the performance zone, they almost inevitably default to the upper-left survival zone. While he acknowledges they certainly spend time performing at Google, the reality of constant workplace demands prevents anyone from staying there permanently.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: The Four Energy Quadrants accDescr: A two-by-two grid showing energy states based on emotional valence (negative vs positive) and physiological arousal (high vs low).

subgraph HighEnergy ["High Energy (High Arousal)"] direction LR SZ["Survival Zone\n(High Negative)\nAnxiety, Fear, Urgency"] PZ["Performance Zone\n(High Positive)\nFocus, Engagement, Flow"] end

subgraph LowEnergy ["Low Energy (Low Arousal)"] direction LR BZ["Burnout Zone\n(Low Negative)\nExhaustion, Depression"] RZ["Recovery Zone\n(Low Positive)\nRecharging, Rest, Renewal"] end

SZ <--> PZ SZ -.-> BZ PZ <==>|"Target: Intentional Oscillation"| RZ ```

When an audience member asks which zone the room is currently inhabiting, Schwartz jokes that everyone present is pushed into the high-positive quadrant simply because he is up front expending massive energy: “I know I'm there and I'm the person who's generating the most energy. So, it would be hard for you to be depressed with me running around like a chicken with my head cutoff trying to entertain you.” Turning back to corporate culture, he explains that the recovery zone is universally treated with suspicion and dismissed as slacking off. Even vacation has ceased to be a true sanctuary of renewal. When he asks how many attendees took a vacation during the prior year without answering a single work email, only about six percent raise their hands.

- Roughly 6% of the Googlers in the audience managed to take a vacation in the past year without checking or responding to work email. - The standard, reactive daily pattern oscillates between the high-positive Performance Zone and the high-negative Survival Zone, collapsing into Burnout only when energy is utterly depleted.

[38:28](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=2308s) Balancing Energy: Lessons from Elite Athletes and Pit Stops

Schwartz proposes a fundamental paradigm shift: instead of bouncing reactively between high-positive performance and high-negative survival, people must learn to move intentionally and rhythmically between high performance and true recovery. Drawing on principles observed in world-class athletes, he emphasizes that human beings are not linear machines. Elite athletes treat rest not as an indulgence, but as an essential training component governed by precise work-rest ratios, interval training, and periodization. “Recovery is performance specific. It affects your ability to perform at a high-level and to perform at a level of high-quality.”

He contrasts this intentional rhythm with the modern worker's operating mode: running completely “flat out” until collapsing. To illustrate the flaw in this approach, Schwartz uses the metaphor of the Indianapolis 500. The winning driver is never the one who attempts to drive continuously at maximum speed without stopping; rather, it is the driver who drives as fast as possible on the track and executes pit stops with maximum efficiency. Pit crews train recovery as a high-performance craft, routinely replacing four tires, cleaning windshield wipers, and refueling a car in approximately fifteen seconds. Schwartz argues that higher demands require more frequent pit stops, yet people constantly substitute genuine rest with chemical crutches, living by the motto: “I try to keep my coffee buzz going till the Martini buzz kicks in.”

- Winning performance hinges on the quality and efficiency of recovery, not simply driving non-stop until the vehicle breaks down. - An average Formula or IndyCar pit stop lasts roughly 15 seconds, demonstrating that renewal can be brief if executed with discipline and precision. - “In order for us to sustain performance, we need to learn to balance the expenditure of energy with the intermittent renewal of energy,” Tony Schwartz stated.

[42:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=2569s) Ultradian Rhythms and the Performance Pulse

Human biology operates on oscillations rather than linear timelines. Schwartz points out that every organ and biological system—from individual cellular pulsations to heart rate variability and the contract-relax mechanics of muscular movement—functions as a pulse. When people ignore these natural rhythms and attempt to match the continuous, linear output of computers, they suffer physical penalties such as neck, back, and joint pain. Beyond the familiar 24-hour circadian cycle governing nighttime sleep and daytime waking, the human body operates on an ultradian cycle known as the Basic Rest-Activity Cycle (BRAC).

```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: The Ultradian Performance Pulse accDescr: Flowchart illustrating the 90-120 minute cycle of high physiological arousal followed by an energy dip, and the choice between synthetic override versus true renewal.

A["High Arousal Work\n(90–120 minutes)"] --> B["Ultradian Trough\n(Energy Drop & Fatigue)"] B --> C{"Worker Response"} C -->|"Override"| D["Survival Zone\nCaffeine, Adrenaline, Cortisol"] C -->|"Pit Stop"| E["Intentional Recovery\nTrue Disengagement & Renewal"] D --> A E --> A ```

While nighttime sleep cycles move from light and REM stages into deep delta rest every 90 to 120 minutes, an identical rhythm persists throughout the waking day at higher physiological arousal. At the end of every 90- to 120-minute cycle, the body experiences a distinct physiological trough. Instead of taking an intermittent break, most workers override these biological signals with coffee, Diet Coke, and their body's internal emergency stimulants: adrenaline, noradrenaline, and cortisol. Pushing through this dip forces people into the survival quadrant and clouds cognitive sharpness. High performance requires clear boundaries where engagement is fully focused and disengagement is completely disconnected:

> “So what we really want to do to perform at our best is to build a rhythmic relationship throughout the day where when you're engaged, you're truly engaged; and when you're disengaged, you're truly disengaged and you're not living in the gray zone in between.”

- Heart rate variability serves as a primary marker of physical health, reflecting the heart's capability to oscillate flexibly between high demand and rest. - Ultradian cycles (the Basic Rest-Activity Cycle) cause a natural physiological energy dip every 90 to 120 minutes during the workday. - Schwartz points to a recent *60 Minutes* broadcast featured on The Energy Project's homepage that documents the severe physiological costs of chronic sleep deprivation. - Physical fitness is ultimately defined not by how long one can strain, but by the speed of recovery.

[47:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=2831s) Pacing vs. Sprinting: The Paradigm Shift in Energy Management

Tony Schwartz explains that recovery is a trainable capacity: the more an individual trains themselves to recover, the faster and more proficient they become at it. This deliberate oscillation is essential for sustainable high performance and meeting intense demand. Pointing out the typical daily pattern, he notes that people spend their days ricocheting reactively between the high-negative and high-positive energy zones whenever fatigue sets in, becoming irritable, anxious, and frustrated as reserves run dry. To counter this, Schwartz urges a shift toward intentional energy management, introducing renewal breaks every 90 to 120 minutes.

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Marathon vs Sprinter Mindset accDescr: Comparison showing the marathon approach of pacing and disengagement versus the sprinter approach of full engagement followed by renewal.

subgraph Marathon["Marathon Mindset (Reactive)"] M1["No finish line in sight"] --> M2["Unconscious pacing & partial engagement"] M2 --> M3["Chronic depletion, irritability & burnout"] end

subgraph Sprinter["Sprinter Mindset (Intentional)"] S1["Clear 90-120 min interval"] --> S2["100% full engagement"] S2 --> S3["Defined finish line"] S3 --> S4["Deliberate recovery & renewal"] S4 --> S1 end ```

He frames this shift as moving away from living life like a marathon runner. In a marathon, where the race feels endless and has no visible finish line, people either consciously or unconsciously pace themselves by withholding full engagement:

> “I’m suggesting to you a really radical idea. Reinvent yourself as a sprinter.”

A sprinter crouches at the starting blocks, looks down at a finite 100-, 200-, or 400-yard track, and commits to expending 100 percent of their energy because an endpoint exists where they can immediately stop and recover. In contrast, modern work life has stripped away boundaries, stopping points, and finish lines. Schwartz observes that the very devices and technologies that allow workers to be connected all the time have made it virtually impossible to ever disconnect.

[50:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=3011s) Building Positive Rituals to Drive Real Change

Testing the audience's willingness to act, Schwartz asks how many people find that his framework makes fundamental sense; nearly every hand in the room goes up. He then asks how many people will honestly walk out of the room and immediately make fundamental changes in their lives based on the talk. Only two or three hands remain raised. Schwartz reassures them that this failure to change is not personal weakness: human beings are creatures of habit who default to repeating yesterday's actions today and tomorrow. Relying exclusively on conscious will and the prefrontal cortex rarely creates lasting change; instead, individuals must co-opt the autonomic nervous system by establishing automatic, repetitive behaviors.

> “To manage your energy more optimally, you have to build what we call positive rituals. These are highly specific behaviors that become automatic over time.”

To build an effective ritual, Schwartz instructs attendees to pick one question from the Energy Project audit that yielded an upsetting or costly "yes" answer, and design a replacement behavior. Vague resolutions—such as deciding to work out three days a week—almost always fail because they lack precise scheduling, causing people to default back to pressing demands under stress. Success requires treating the habit like an immovable Google calendar appointment:

- **Specific scheduling**: Designating the exact day, wake-up time, and activity (e.g., waking at 6:45 a.m. to do cardiovascular training on Monday and Wednesday at 7:00 a.m., and strength training on Friday). - **Friction reduction**: Preparing equipment the night before, such as setting out workout clothes. - **The ritual benchmark**: A behavior has officially become a ritual when skipping it feels worse than expending the energy to execute it. - **Immediate implementation**: Defining the specific, bite-sized ritual within the next hour before post-lecture motivation dissipates. - **Achievable scoping**: If someone does not exercise at all, they should start with a 15-minute walk in the middle of the day rather than committing to five 30-minute runs.

[55:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=3311s) Q&A: Emotional and Mental Rituals, and the Tennis Discovery

Opening the floor to questions alongside Google host Wittenberg, Schwartz responds to an audience member asking for concrete examples of non-physical rituals. Because human biology naturally defaults toward negative emotions under pressure, emotional rituals are necessary to pump positive fuel into the system:

> “What you do want to do emotionally is you want to drive as much positive energy into your reservoir as you can because we default to negative emotions.”

Schwartz outlines two specific emotional rituals: - **Notes of appreciation**: Writing a note once or twice a week to recognize someone who does not receive enough credit, which benefits both the recipient and the writer's emotional state. - **End-of-day inventory**: Writing down three specific things that are going right in one's life in a journal before leaving work or going to sleep.

For mental focus, Schwartz recommends dedicating the first 60 to 90 minutes of the workday entirely to the single task that creates the greatest long-term value, rather than succumbing to the reactive trap of opening email first and operating at the mercy of other people's priorities. This critical morning block must be decided and scheduled the night before.

An attendee then asks about the tennis research Schwartz skipped earlier. Schwartz laughs, remarking, “God bless you. You can't get away with anything at Google.” He recounts his early research alongside his former partner, Jim Loehr, studying top-200 professional tennis players. They struggled to see what separated the elite players from the tier just below them while points were being played. The breakthrough came when Loehr observed two top competitors sharing a court and noticed that between points, elite players engaged in an identical, unconscious four-step sequence of behaviors to rapidly drop their heart rates and recover before the next point began.

[58:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=3504s) Renewal Rituals and the Heart Rate Recovery of Elite Athletes

Tony Schwartz explains the hidden mechanics of how world-class tennis players sustain peak performance under pressure. Unbeknownst even to themselves, top competitors systematically exploit the brief 20 to 30 seconds between points to refuel their bodies and achieve rapid physiological recovery. Schwartz breaks this down into four specific, sequenced physical behaviors:

```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: Four-step recovery sequence accDescr: The four sequential actions tennis players take between points to drop heart rate and renew energy. subgraph S1["Mental Disengagement"] A["Turn away from the net"] --> B["Leave the previous point behind"] end subgraph S2["Physical Relaxation"] B --> C["Switch racket to non-dominant hand"] C --> D["Allow dominant arm to relax"] end subgraph S3["Focus and Physiology"] D --> E["Fiddle with racket strings"] E --> F["Adopt the upright 'peacock walk'"] end ```

First, the player turns their back to the net, symbolically and mentally putting the finished point behind them. Second, they switch the racket over to their non-dominant hand, which allows their dominant arm and shoulder muscles to completely relax. Third, they begin adjusting or playing with the strings on their racket, a repetitive action that narrows their mental focus to the immediate physical task rather than worrying about the score. Fourth, they carry themselves with an upright, confident posture that Schwartz and his colleagues dubbed the "peacock walk." Schwartz points out the mind-body connection here: how a person holds their body directly dictates how they feel, and feeling better elevates subsequent performance.

When researchers monitored the players during these intervals, they discovered that executing these four sequenced steps caused heart rates to plunge at an astonishing rate of approximately one beat per second. As Schwartz observes: “So, the great players were getting 20 to 30 heartbeats of recovery between every point and the players who weren't doing this sequenced set of recovery activities were getting virtually none.”

[59:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=3572s) Managing the Post-Lunch Energy Slump and Conclusion

An audience member challenges Schwartz's framing of human oscillation. The questioner remarks that Schwartz assumes people primarily bounce between positive and negative emotions across high-energy states. In reality, the audience member finds himself fluctuating along an axis of high versus low energy. He gives the relatable example of eating lunch right after the talk: he anticipates sinking into a familiar post-lunch slump where he will not feel angry or negative toward anyone, but simply sluggish, tired, and ready for a nap.

Schwartz responds by validating the physiological reality of circadian rhythms, but insists that intentional habits can dramatically blunt the dreaded afternoon crash. He argues that by building deliberate recovery breaks into the workday early on—beginning an hour and a half after arriving at the office, alternating bouts of intense focus with conscious rejuvenation—an individual will avoid feeling completely drained after lunch. Schwartz draws on his own transformation, noting that he used to be utterly exhausted every afternoon until he overhauled his daily routines. While biology dictates that a person will inevitably have less cognitive stamina during the circadian trough around 2:30 or 3:00 PM compared to 10:00 AM, pacing transforms day-to-day work capacity. As Schwartz emphasizes: “But, I will promise you that you will get a much more even availability of energy if you more regularly and intermittently build in periods of recovery.”

Following this response, the event host, Wittenberg, closes the session. He notes that time has run out, invites anyone interested to join Schwartz for lunch or ask questions at the front of the room, and leads the audience in a final round of applause.

- High-demand, complex cognitive tasks should be scheduled earlier in the morning or delayed until after the mid-afternoon circadian dip passes. - Regular, intermittent intervals of rest fundamentally stabilize energy availability across the entire workday.

## Notable quotes > [38:28](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=2308s) In order for us to sustain performance, we need to learn to balance the expenditure of energy with the intermittent renewal of energy — Tony Schwartz

> [50:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=3011s) To manage your energy more optimally, you have to build what we call positive rituals. These are highly specific behaviors that become automatic over time. — Tony Schwartz

> [47:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=2831s) I’m suggesting to you a really radical idea. Reinvent yourself as a sprinter. — Tony Schwartz

> [38:28](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=2308s) Recovery is performance specific. It affects your ability to perform at a high-level and to perform at a level of high-quality. — Tony Schwartz

> [55:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=3311s) What you do want to do emotionally is you want to drive as much positive energy into your reservoir as you can because we default to negative emotions. — Tony Schwartz

> [25:38](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c&t=1538s) If you're feeling anxious when you're actually performing, be guaranteed, you're not going to perform at your best. — Tony Schwartz

## Mentioned Tony Schwartz, Evan Wittenberg, Google, Google University, The Energy Project, The New York Times, Newsweek, New York Magazine, Esquire, Fast Company, Donald Trump, The Art of the Deal, What Really Matters: Searching for Wisdom in America, The Power of Full Engagement, BlackBerry, Indianapolis 500, 60 Minutes, Jim Loehr, Harvard Business Review

## Video description Tony Scwartz spoke at the Google headquarters in Mountain View, Californiaon 4/17/2008 as part of the Leading@google speaker series.

Tony Schwartz is the founder and president of The Energy Project http://www.theenergyproject.com/home.html. He is the co-author of "The Power of Full Engagement", which has been translated into 24 languages. Tony has written three other books, including What Really Matters: Searching for Wisdom in America. His most recent article, "The Science of Stamina," was published in the October 2007 issue of the Harvard Business Review.

Demand is relentlessly rising. Our capacity is not keeping pace. The traditional solution to higher demand has been to invest more time. Unfortunately, time is finite, and most of us have no hours left to invest. Energy, however, can be systematically expanded --- and it can also be regularly renewed. To operate at our best, we need four energy sources: physical (quantity), emotional (quality), mental (focus), and the energy of the human spirit (purpose). This talk will focus on the role of energy in fueling sustainable high performance, and in motivating others.

[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke6X2eME3c)

中文简报

托尼·施瓦茨向谷歌员工表示:精力恢复优于延长工时 投入额外工时无法应对不断增加的职场需求,因为时间是有限的,这要求员工在90分钟的专注冲刺与规律的恢复习惯之间交替进行,以扩大生理机能容量。 托尼·施瓦茨认为,试图通过投入更多时间来应对持续增加的职场需求在生理上是不可持续的,这要求专业人士将重点转向管理可再生的精力。人类的表现建立在四个相互关联的维度之上:身体容量、情绪质量、思维专注度和精神目标。施瓦茨指出,现代工作者习惯性地将自己困在高压生存状态和长期分心中,全力运转直至精疲力竭。借鉴顶尖运动员的恢复习惯和超昼夜节律,他敦促知识工作者像短跑运动员那样行事,在90至120分钟的深度专注区间与有意识的精力恢复休息之间交替切换。 人类的生理机能容量自然在30岁达到峰值,若无积极干预便会衰退,随着职业和生活需求的增加,会造成日益扩大的机能赤字。 (4:06) 时间是一种每周168小时且无法增加的有限资源,这意味着可持续的高绩效需要管理可再生精力,而非投入更多时间。 (6:51) 人体生理在日间依循90至120分钟的超昼夜节律运转;若不进行间歇性恢复休息,会诱发有害的战或逃激素,从而使前额叶皮层关闭。 (42:49) 顶尖表现者将休息视为一种训练有素的自律习惯,例如世界排名前200的网球运动员在回合间利用20至30秒的常规动作,有系统地将心率每秒降低大约一次跳动。 (58:24)

Source quotes

[38:28] Tony Schwartz: In order for us to sustain performance, we need to learn to balance the expenditure of energy with the intermittent renewal of energy [50:11] Tony Schwartz: To manage your energy more optimally, you have to build what we call positive rituals. These are highly specific behaviors that become automatic over time. [47:11] Tony Schwartz: I’m suggesting to you a really radical idea. Reinvent yourself as a sprinter. [38:28] Tony Schwartz: Recovery is performance specific. It affects your ability to perform at a high-level and to perform at a level of high-quality. [55:11] Tony Schwartz: What you do want to do emotionally is you want to drive as much positive energy into your reservoir as you can because we default to negative emotions. [25:38] Tony Schwartz: If you're feeling anxious when you're actually performing, be guaranteed, you're not going to perform at your best.

Original transcript

[0:00] >> WITTENBERG: Hi, everybody. Thank you for coming. My name is Evan Wittenberg. I work [0:04] in the leadership development and people management group as part of Google University. And we're [0:08] very excited today to be introducing Tony Schwartz as our next Leading@Google lecturer. [0:14] Tony has an interesting history. Currently, he's the founder, president, and CEO of a [0:18] company called the Energy Project which deals all about with how to manage your energy, [0:22] not your time to be more effective and achieve optimal performance in the workplace, at home, [0:26] in life, et cetera. His background is really interesting. He began his career as a journalist. [0:31] He was a reporter for the New York Times, associate editor at Newsweek, staff writer [0:35] at New York and Esquire Magazines, and a columnist for Fast Company. He also has a little dirty [0:41] secret from his past, co-authored the number one, international bestseller "The Art of [0:44] the Deal" with Donald Trump. So if you have questions about his opinion of Trump, you [0:48] can ask him later. And more importantly, wrote a book call "What Really Matters: Searching [0:52] for Wisdom in America." What he's here to talk to us today about is what I alluded to [0:57] you before, how we can be more effective by thinking about our energy throughout the day [1:01] rather than our time. And he's actually piloted his two-day version of the course here at [1:07] Google that some people on the audience, raise your hand if you've been through that course; [1:11] a couple of people. So, you can look around and ask them later if you want to know how [1:14] that was and we'll be announcing more about that in the next few weeks. A couple of important [1:19] things that Tony has asked, one thing that you'll learn about in this book when you read [1:23] it, for those of you who got it, "The Power of Full Engagement," is that the brain is [1:26] actually unable to multitask. So Tony has asked to please close your laptops unless [1:30] you're actually taking notes about this because it's not possible to pay attention to both [1:34] even though we fool ourselves about that all the time. There will be time at the end for [1:38] questions and I would ask you to please come up to this microphone at the end if you have [1:42] questions about the talk. Hopefully, Tony will keep you engaged so you won't be tempted [1:46] to go back to the Blackberrys and computers throughout the talk. And I think without further [1:51] adieu, let me introduce Tony Schwartz. Welcome. >> SCHWARTZ: Thank you. Thank you. Good morning. [1:58] It's great to be here with a wonderful day. This work comes out of a passion of mine that [2:05] began somewhere in my teens when other people were doing things very different than I was [2:09] doing. I was trying to figure out what life was all about and what made it possible, what [2:14] was it that made it possible, I guess, back then to be a happier and more satisfied human [2:18] being than I was growing up in a difficult New York Jewish family. But over time that [2:24] evolved into a passion around, what makes it possible for a person to be all they're [2:30] capable of being. What makes it possible for a human being to build progressively over [2:36] their life a richer, deeper version of who they are? And this work is about that. It's [2:43] nominally about helping organizations to be more effective and more productive. It's nominally [2:50] about the difference about what it takes to be a great leader. But I deeply believe that [2:55] you can be a great human being and it may or may not have any impact on--I'm sorry, [3:01] you could be--yes, you could be a great human being and it may or may not have any impact [3:05] on whether you can be a great leader. But you can't be a great leader if you're not [3:10] a great human being. And so to me, the work of leadership, the work of really being the [3:17] most effective you can possibly be begins with the work of yourself. And so today, I'm [3:23] going to give you just a little taste of it. You're going to see that it's oriented a little [3:28] bit in the physical direction and that's largely because everything begins with the body. I [3:33] want to assure you that if you choose to, if you're intrigued by this work that there's [3:38] a lot more to it and that we ultimately take account of quite a wide variety of components [3:46] that influenced your capacity to show up with everything you've got in each part of your [3:51] life. So, what is it that starts us off? What is it that makes it possible for me to get [3:58] folks interested in bringing me into organizations? And basically, it's this. It's that we have [4:06] developed a gap between demand and capacity. So, here's the deal. In your lives, what happens [4:13] is when you're born, you obviously have very low demand. You make a lot of demands but [4:18] you don't have a lot of demand. And your demand progressively goes up over time. And in the [4:24] world we live in, it just keeps on going until hopefully one day you drop off the face of [4:28] the cliff and your demands in the most graceful way possible. But in the meantime, what's [4:35] happening is that in the absence of a conscious and intentional intervention on your part, [4:43] the capacity you bring to the table is rising no matter what you do. How many people here--well, [4:50] I don't want to ask that quite yet--the capacity in your life is rising no matter what you [4:55] do to your body, no matter what you do to yourself. Your capacity just keeps on going [5:00] up, but it hits a peak at a certain point in your life in the absence of intervention. [5:07] What age do you think that peak is? >> MALE: Forty-five. [5:12] >> SCHWARTZ: Unfortunately, it is 30 not 45. Now, in this group unlike most of the groups [5:20] I talked to, that's not yet such bad news for you because you're not there yet. But [5:24] guess what, even if you're not, I promise you will be. And what happens then is that [5:30] your capacity progressively diminishes over time most especially, most especially at the [5:38] physical level. So for example, in the absence of you're doing anything to keep this from [5:43] happening, from the age of 30 on, you will lose one half pound of lean muscle mass every [5:48] year for the rest of your life. That's not good news. And the reason it's not good news [5:55] is that demand is not only--how many of you would say that the demand in your life over [6:00] the last two or three years is as high as it's ever been in your life. Okay. And how [6:07] many of you expect given that you probably pushed yourself pretty damn hard to get to [6:11] where you are today that over the next year the demand in your life will finally begin [6:18] to diminish. So, in other words, your demand is the highest it's been ever over the last [6:25] three years and you have every expectation that it's going to continue to rise at a minimum [6:31] not to diminish. Let me ask you this question. How many of you think that along with your [6:36] demand your capacity will rise systematically to keep pace with your demand over the next [6:44] period of time? Houston, we got a problem. It's this problem, it's this gap, and that's [6:51] the game we're in the business of trying to address. So, the issue is that when it comes [7:00] to meeting demand, the number one resource most of us use, naturally use, instinctively [7:07] use is our time. So, if you've got more demand, you put in more hours. And I'm sure that many [7:13] of you are putting in a lot of hours. And in fact, organizations, even progressive organizations [7:19] like Google, even if it doesn't say it, even if it has all sorts of wonderful things to [7:23] give you an opportunity not to be working does in fact value you to a considerable degree [7:30] based on the number of hours it's perceived that you invest. Now, that's great for a certain [7:36] period of time. But when you reach the limit of the number of hours you have available [7:43] to invest, you've got a problem when it comes to expanding your capacity, don't you. How [7:49] many people here would like me to stop, spend a few minutes giving you some advice on how [7:54] to use your free hours? So, we're already. That dance card is already full, isn't it? [8:00] That dance card is fall and the bottom line is that time is finite. You've got 168 hours [8:07] in the week. You're never going to have another hour and you already don't have any free but [8:11] I guess you're--but I know that your demand is rising. So, that's not going to solve your [8:16] problem if we are going to make it possible to meet the increasing demand in our lives, [8:22] to take account of the fact that we live in a more complex world, what you're going to [8:26] have to do is you're going to have to find a way other than time to get more done. In [8:31] other words, you're going to have to get more than in less time. And the only way that we [8:36] have recognized that that really fundamentally is possible is to go after a different resource [8:41] and that resource is energy. And the reason energy is a good resource to use is because [8:47] energy unlike time is inside you. Time is outside you. It moves by you like a train [8:53] and once it's gone, it's gone forever. But energy is inside you and it can be systematically [8:58] expanded and it can be regularly renewed. So energy is a fabulous resource to put it [9:06] in your disposal. But what is energy? What is energy? Because it's easy to say energy; [9:11] there's all kinds of energy and, you know, it's easy to get real soft on the idea of [9:17] energy. One of the reasons that organizations use hours is they're very clear to calibrate, [9:23] minutes, hours, days, that's really easy to calibrate. Energy is more ambiguous, more [9:27] subjective. So what is energy? Well, it turns out, actually, energy has been defined. Energy [9:33] is the capacity to do work, that's what you go in your physics courses, right? Energy [9:37] is the capacity to do work. So in other words, in simple terms, if you have more energy, [9:44] you have more capacity, don't you? So in other words, if I can help you to systematically [9:49] build the reservoir of energy that you have available, if I could put more fuel in your [9:54] tank then presumably you'll have more capacity. We tend to focus on skills and competencies, [10:01] that's the life you've lived. You've all developed an enormous number of skills, you've had all [10:06] kinds of achievements around skills and you've been measured by how many of those skills [10:11] you have. You've got into Google because you have more than most people, way more than [10:15] most people. But here's the problem in a demand-laden world with focusing simply on capacity. I'm [10:23] sorry, on competency. Capacity is underneath competency. Capacity is what makes it possible [10:30] for you to bring your skill and talent to life. You can't run on empty, although a lot [10:35] of us try to do it. So if you are trying to bring your skill and talent to life but you [10:40] are, you didn't sleep a lot last night or you don't eat the right foods, or you've got [10:45] the wrong emotional state, or you weren't good at focusing your attention, or your level [10:49] of commitment and passion isn't all that high, these are all components of capacity, then [10:54] you're not going to be able to do it. And we all know people, and we all know times [10:58] in our lives when you--despite your enormous skill and talent, haven't been able to deliver [11:03] it, particularly under pressure. In a human being, I'm sorry--in a car, you need one source [11:11] of energy to get the thing to go, and mostly it's been fuel. Now it's starting to change [11:17] but it still going to primarily be one source of energy. But a human being--a human being [11:23] requires a much more complex set of energies, energy in the human system is multidimensional. [11:30] We need four separate sources of energy in order to be able to perform at our best, each [11:37] one of them is necessary, none of them is sufficient by itself and they deeply influence [11:42] one another. So you can't get by--or I shouldn't say get by, you can get by using only one [11:48] or two of them to any great effect but you can't operate at your best if you do that. [11:53] So what are these four sources of energy? So I've already said that, so I don't need [11:59] to repeat it. The four--the four sources of energy start with the physical, why? Because [12:06] the physical is the base, it's the--it's the foundation on which everything else rests. [12:13] If you don't have sufficient physical energy, is it going to influence your focus of attention? [12:18] Is it going to influence your ability to manage your emotion under pressure? Of course it [12:22] is. So, we have tended to make this not performance relevant or relevant to performance in the [12:29] work place, we've discounted how important physical energy is, and we haven't systematically [12:35] focused attention on it, and in fact increasingly in schools for kids where we're starting to [12:40] do work we see that they basically dispense with the physical dimension. They don't pay [12:44] attention to it at all. You know, if you're not on a varsity team in high school, then [12:50] you're not getting any attention to your physical capacity. Physical capacity has four components. [12:56] It's the simplest of all the capacities because of that. Number one, nutrition; you're ability [13:02] to move glucose and sustain glucose at a certain level in your body, that's number one. Number [13:07] two, fitness; how well you transport oxygen through your body. Number three is sleep; [13:14] how well do you sleep, do you sleep enough hours, do you sleep deeply enough. And the [13:19] forth is, and this is the one that people don't pay much attention to is recovery or [13:23] renewal; the day time equivalent of sleep because the body is designed to sleep twice. [13:29] The body is designed to sleep for a longer period of time at night and it's designed [13:32] to sleep for a short period of time in the afternoon. And so it's also designed, unlike [13:38] a machine, it's designed to move rhythmically between the expenditure and the recovery of [13:43] energy. And so you need to, as you'll see when I get a little further into this description, [13:49] you need to learn to value intermittent renewal during the day in the same way that you currently, [13:55] I don't want to say in the same way that you currently value sleep because a lot of you [13:58] don't value sleep very much. But in the way you should be valuing sleep. Okay. So that's [14:03] physical energy. Then there is the quality of your energy. The quality of your energy, [14:07] that's how you feel because how you feel profoundly influences how well you perform, how well [14:15] you lead, how well you interact with others, there is a very specific set of emotions that [14:22] are associated with sustainable high performance, and I'm going to get to those and talk about [14:27] those in just a moment. So we've got quantity of energy, we've got quality of energy, and [14:32] then we've got focus of energy. So that's the mental dimension. Focus of energy is what [14:36] the Evan was obliquely referring to when he said that I didn't want you to be using your [14:41] computers and Blackberrys. The reason I actually didn't want you to is because it makes me [14:45] feel bad. It makes me feel like you don't care, like you don't love me, and I have a [14:53] high need. But the focus of your energy is, the work we do around this dimension and the [15:01] importance of it is that for thousands of years it has been understood that we do our [15:09] most effective work when we focus on one thing at a time. That's were the meditative traditions [15:15] came from. We have lost that. Google is responsible for a lot of that because of the number of [15:22] opportunities it gives us to interrupt our attention, but there are thousands of ways [15:27] now that we get our attention interrupted and it's at extraordinary cause to your productivity. [15:34] It's also at extraordinary cause to the depth of work that you do. You know that if you [15:38] go out and try to take a run for example, that the first two or three minutes or the [15:44] first five minutes, how do you feel? You don't feel very good, you're not warmed up, you're [15:50] not feeling like your muscles are warm, like you're loose, like you're in your rhythm. [15:54] Well the same thing is true mentally, if you try to begin a hard task for the first three [16:01] minutes, or five minutes, or eight minutes, or whatever it is for you, you're going to [16:05] be half there and half not there. You are slowly dropping down into a state of absorption. [16:10] If you interrupt yourself frequently then what you are doing is you're interfering with [16:15] that level of absorption, and on average, the average person stays on task in an organization [16:22] in an America today for eleven minutes. Eleven minutes on a task before they go on to another [16:29] task, but during those eleven minutes, they interrupt themselves with something, an average [16:35] of every three minutes. So you can see that we've got a big interference with our ability [16:40] to bring absorbed attention to the table which is part of the energy equation. And then finally, [16:45] there is the one that sounds as soft as in fact probably the most important which is [16:50] what we call the energy of the human spirit. The energy of the human spirit is the energy [16:58] derived from the sense, from the experience of purpose and from an alignment between what [17:06] you say is important in your life and how you actually live; and the better that alignment, [17:13] the more powerful the source of energy available to you. In fact, this energy drives, this [17:19] is the "Why," the others of the "Hows." This "Why" energy drives your behavior at all the [17:25] other level. So, it's an additional source of energy, emotionally, mentally, and physically [17:31] when you've got it in place. So four sources of energy, if you got all those four sources [17:35] of energy happening for you, if you've got that full reservoir of them, then you could [17:40] fire on all cylinders. How many of you got those nailed, those four? Let's find out. [17:47] You got a pencil, or you got something that you can write on? I'm going to take you through [17:51] a little energy audit; that's what we call, a little energy audit to give you a sense [17:56] of how you're doing in terms of these four dimensions of energy. How much energy do you [18:03] have available to you in each of these four dimensions? This little audit is designed [18:09] around what we have determined, and it's very strongly research-based. If you go on our [18:15] website, the energyproject.com, you will see a database for everything that I'm talking [18:21] about. So I'm not talking about these things because they occurred to me as good ideas. [18:25] This is our gathering of the research. So, what I want you to do in each of these questions, [18:32] I'd like you to answer, I'd like you to just make a check mark on your paper if the answer [18:38] to the question is yes. That's all you have to do. And then at the end we'll add up the [18:43] "yes" answers. Bad news is this is one of those rare test where getting a "yes" doesn't [18:49] serve you well. Number one, I don't regularly get at least seven to eight hours of sleep, [18:54] and I often wake up feeling tired. Number two, I frequently skip breakfast or I settle [19:00] for something that isn't particularly healthy. Number three, I don't workout enough, meaning, [19:06] cardiovascular training at least three times a week and strength training at least once [19:10] a week. If you don't do both of those, you're a "yes." Number four, I don't take regular [19:16] breaks during the day to renew and recharge, and I often eat lunch at my desk if I ate [19:22] lunch at all. Number five, I frequently find myself feeling irritable, impatient, or anxious [19:30] at work especially when demand is high. Number six, I don't have enough time with my family [19:36] and loved ones, and when I'm with them I'm not always really with them. Number seven, [19:42] I take too little time in my life for the activities that I most deeply enjoy. Number [19:48] eight, I rarely stop to express my appreciation to others or to savor and celebrate my accomplishments [19:57] and blessings. If you don't do both of those things, you're a "yes." Number nine, I have [20:03] difficulty focusing on one thing at a time, and I'm easily distracted during the day, [20:08] especially by email. That's a "yes" for all of you. Number 10, I spend much of my time [20:16] reacting to immediate demands rather than focusing on activities with long-term value [20:23] and higher leverage. Number 11, I don't take enough time for reflections, strategizing, [20:28] or thinking creatively. Number 12, I work in the evenings and/or on the weekends and [20:34] I rarely take a vacation free of work, if I take a vacation at all. Number 13, I spend [20:41] too little time at work doing what I do best and enjoy most. Number 14, there are significant [20:48] gaps between what I say is important in my life and how I actually live; I say that my [20:55] girlfriend, significant other, wife, husband is important, but I don't spend much time [21:00] or energy on that. Number 15, my decisions at work are more influenced by external demands [21:06] than by a strong, clear sense of my own purpose. And finally, number 16, I don't invest enough [21:12] positive time and energy in making a positive difference to others in the world. Total them [21:21] up. Okay. All right. There's what? >> MALE: Cursing. [21:38] >> SCHWARTZ: Cursing. So, how many people have eight or more "yes" answers? Eight or [21:42] more "yes" answers. Look around, the good news is you've got company. The bad news is, [21:46] you've got company. Eight or more. How many people—you're going to hold it up or you're [21:52] 12? How many people have 12 or more? How many people who have 12 or more? Okay. How many [21:57] people are happy about the number of "yes" answers? How many? Five. And by the way, five [22:05] is extraordinarily low. Five is extraordinarily low, but not of those five is something that [22:11] you are glad is a "yes," right? Right. So, here's the interesting thing. I don't want [22:16] to get into this too deeply because of the time limitations, but just at the most simple, [22:21] simple level. If you have eight "yes" answers, think of it as 50 percent of the potential [22:28] capacity available to you that is currently available to you. That's enormous. What is [22:36] this all about? Why does this happen? And I will submit to you that the reason this [22:41] happens is because we don't make capacity important, because we take capacity for granted. [22:47] We assume that if the demand goes up, our capacity will expand naturally to meet it. [22:53] But that's not the way it works, and it takes a toll not only at the level of productivity [22:58] but it takes a toll emotionally, it takes a tool spiritually, and it takes a toll physically. [23:04] So what really happens is that we go numbed to this reality. We tend to not notice this. [23:12] Once I put this up and you look at these answers and you say to yourself, "Oh, my god. These [23:17] are central things in life that are dead obvious that I should be doing and I don't do them." [23:22] You have a hundred stories you can tell me if I let give you the time about why you don't [23:27] do them. But the reality is it's not doing you any good not to do them and it's getting [23:32] in the way both in your professional and in your personal life. So once I raise it up [23:38] into consciousness which is step one, now you can say to yourself, "Okay. So what do [23:43] I do about this? What do I do about this because Tony..." And this is the story part that begins: [23:50] "I am working really long hours. I got a long commute. I got obligations with my family. [23:58] I've got other things I'd like to do. I can't do all these things, so get real." All right. [24:05] Well, I want to look at this because the real issue for you once you've got this up and [24:10] you're looking at it dead honest, and when you walk out of here, I hope you will. In [24:14] fact, anybody who would like me to send you the energy audit, I'd be happy to send it [24:19] through Evan and he will send it to anybody who wants it. So give me your card at the [24:23] end and I'll get you the energy audit so you can keep track of how you're doing as the [24:27] future unfolds before you. But what I want to look at now is I want to look at the consequence [24:38] of your having whatever level of capacity you have. And the way I want to look at it [24:42] in a very simple form based on the understanding that we have four different energy states [24:50] that we can find ourselves in in the course of the day. But only one of those energy states [24:57] serves us best. And those energy states are fed by each of these dimensions that we've [25:05] already been talking about by how much capacity you have in each of these four tanks. So I [25:11] want to look at the practical result of your having those relatively frightening scores [25:20] that most of you have. And this too can become a very simple way. I'd also be happy when [25:27] it's done to send you this slide. This too is something that you can keep as a barometer [25:33] or as a measure of how you're doing in the course of the day. So let's take a look at [25:38] it. We call this the energy quadrants, okay. Now, the vertical axis refers to the quantity [25:46] of your energy from low to high. Okay? And then the horizontal axis refers to the quality [25:51] of your energy from negative to positive. So, therefore, we end up having four quadrants, [25:57] four different kinds of energy. So let me ask you this, if I ask you, "How do you feel? [26:04] How do you feel when you're performing at your best?" I'd like you to just throw out [26:09] some adjectives at me. I'd like you to throw out some adjectives that define how you feel [26:14] when you're performing at your best. >> MALE: Aligned. [26:18] >> SCHWARTZ: Aligned. Happy. >> FEMALE: Satisfied. [26:20] >> SCHWARTZ: Satisfied. Aligned. Happy. Fulfilled. >> FEMALE: Energized. [26:25] >> SCHWARTZ: Energized. >> MALE: Excited. [26:27] >> SCHWARTZ: Excited. >> FEMALE: Exuberant. [26:29] >> SCHWARTZ: Exuberant. Okay. Which quadrant do those go in? [26:33] >> FEMALE: High positive. >> SCHWARTZ: High positive. The upper-right [26:35] quadrant. There's absolutely no question that those are the adjectives that you feel. Those [26:40] are the feeling you have when you're performing at your best. This is a no-brainer. This is [26:46] a no-brainer. And no matter how many people we've asked this question to when we begun [26:51] our work 25 years ago with professional athletes, and we were told that, at that time, the prevailing [26:58] view in sport psychology was that what, a, athletes felt when they were performing at [27:03] their best included a mild amount of anxiety. So, we started asking people, you know. Is [27:08] that what you're feeling? You feel of mild anxiety, the answer was a 100 percent, no. [27:13] They answered just the way you answered. What we feel are positive emotions when we're performing [27:18] at our best. Maybe before you perform, you are feeling a little bit anxious in a performance [27:23] demand. But, if you're feeling anxious when you're actually performing, be guaranteed, [27:28] you're not going to perform at your best. So, there it is, that's--how many of you have [27:33] learned something that you didn't know by seeing that those are the emotions associated [27:37] with high performance, nobody, right? Nobody, that's no big surprise. Here's the surprise, [27:42] if you're not feeling this way, you can't perform at your best. Why is that a surprise? [27:48] Well, because I have to ask you this question. Is this the way you are feeling at work, energized, [27:55] focus, passionate, confident, exuberant, the vast majority at the time? Are there times [28:03] when you're not feeling this way at work? Is there anybody who sometimes doesn't feel [28:09] those emotions at work? So then, the question becomes, so when you're not feeling this way, [28:17] how are you feeling and what's the consequence, right? Because we need to know in the cost-benefit [28:24] ratio if you aren't fueling yourself with the right emotions, what's the cost, what's [28:30] the consequence, so I'm going to start here on the upper left because it's the only other [28:36] zone--energy zone that has energy in it. An absent energy or significant energy, absent [28:43] energy, I don't care whether it's negative or positive, you're not going to be very effective [28:47] in work. So, when you look at this, we call this the survival zone. Now it's interesting, [28:54] the only reason in any of these zones exist is because there is some circumstance or circumstances [29:00] in your life when it's appropriate to be in this zone, otherwise, from an evolutionary [29:03] perspective, it would be naturally selected out, wouldn't it? It only exists because there's [29:08] a value in it. In other words, there's a time in your life when it makes sense to be in [29:13] this zone, it serves you best to be in this zone, when is it? [29:18] >> FEMALE: When you're threatened. >> SCHWARTZ: When you're threatened. Here's [29:22] the problem. If there is a large mountain lion coming at you, being in the survival [29:29] zone is a good thing. The reason is because you will have a physiological shift from your [29:35] parasympathetic nervous system to your sympathetic nervous system from your prefrontal cortex [29:40] testing your limbic system. And what it will--the consequence of it is that you will be able [29:45] to move more quickly. Your limbic system picks up threat more quickly than your prefrontal [29:50] cortex does, so it's really good when your life is in danger. If there's a fire at the [29:54] back in the room right now, I don't want you to be asking yourself, "Let me see, how much [29:59] longer can I listen to this talk before that." What you want to do is you want the body to [30:05] say to you, "Get the hell out and get out," or take water and put it on the fire, fight [30:10] or flight, right? The problem of what you said is that survival is not necessarily always [30:19] a true threat to your life. So in other words, you can feel a sense of threat and you can [30:24] feel a sense of danger in your life, but it might not actually be a threat, but the same [30:30] physiological set of responses happens if you feel threat. What happens? Well, your [30:36] vision narrows; your heart rate increases; your muscles contract; and most important [30:43] in some sense, the blood rushes from your brain into your extremities. Therefore, the [30:48] blood is no longer in your brain. That's not a good thing, if you have to think. Is there [30:56] anybody here who spends any time during the day thinking? That's not a good thing. In [31:03] fact, it's not a metaphor I'm talking about, it's literal. The prefrontal cortex in true [31:09] fight or flight when adrenaline and noradrenaline and cortisol flood through your body shuts [31:14] down because you don't want it to be thinking. It will interfere with your action. The problem [31:20] is that when that happens, all sorts of other things happen too. So if what's happened is [31:26] your boss has yelled at you or your--maybe you've got a problem in your work that you [31:31] can't solve and your worried about meeting a deadline or you feel too much demand in [31:35] your life or you're negative because you're exhausted, any of those, the problem is that [31:43] it means that you're in not a position to do a number of things. When you're in the [31:48] upper left quadrant, here or some of the things, if we had time, I'd get you to tell me, but [31:52] you would know this, I promise you; but the first thing is you perform worse in upper [31:57] left. That's the first problem, because you don't think well, because you can't be imaginative, [32:04] because you aren't reflective, so you don't perform as well. The second thing that happens [32:08] is it's terrible for your health. Cortisol, the hormone cortisol is very important for [32:15] you in certain situations. When it circulates for very long in your body, it becomes a toxin, [32:20] a poison and it leads to virtually every, it has an impact on virtually every major [32:26] illness and disease we know. So to spend time in that zone is very costly to your health, [32:31] it's very costly to your performance. And because energy is contagious, it's very influential [32:38] to other people. For those of you in this room who have responsibility for other people [32:42] who are leaders, your energy is disproportionately contagious by virtue of your position. And [32:49] so you have a significant influence on other people. If you have any doubt that energy [32:54] is contagious, when we're finished with this talk, let's go down together and walk in to [32:59] the local Department of Motor Vehicles and see if your energy changes. Energy is very [33:07] powerful on your emotions. And so, if you think if you think of the impact of your energy, [33:17] it's not just that negative energy is affecting you, it's that it's affecting other people. [33:22] And you've had that experience. You've had the opposite experience of what I'm talking [33:25] about at the Department of Motor Vehicles. You're going to a store or you show up on [33:28] a line in an airport and somebody is in a great mood and has got a smile on their face [33:33] and is relaxed and is exuberant and saying, "Hi, how you're doing today? You look beautiful. [33:39] I bet you're going to have a great trip." Does have an affect on you? Huge, it's unbelievable [33:46] of what the impact of that is. That's what a great salesman is. A great salesman is a [33:50] person who is great at generating the energy that makes people want to buy. It's about [33:56] energy. Okay, so we've got all these costs with the survival zone, and the most significant [34:02] energy cost is what of being in a survival zone. What's the cost of being in a survival [34:08] zone from an energy perspective? It drains it faster. It's like a gas guzzling car. And [34:14] if you spend too much time in the high negative zone, you end up in this zone. How many of [34:19] you come to work feeling that way pretty often? No, you don't, because it's not acceptable. [34:25] Rachel, put your hand down. It's not acceptable to be in that zone, is it? So if you were [34:32] in that zone and you weren't Rachel, you wouldn't admit it, right, because it's not culturally [34:39] acceptable. To be in the upper left zone is culturally acceptable to some extent. It's [34:42] okay to be anxious. It's okay to be frustrated. Though it shouldn't be, it is. But this zone [34:48] is unacceptable. The reason is because this zone is the worst place from which to perform, [34:53] okay? All right, so, we've got these three zones. We know the best zone. We know the [34:59] two negative zones. The other zone, what do you think we'd call the other zone? [35:03] >> FEMALE: Maintenance. >> SCHWARTZ: Maintenance is one word. Resting [35:09] is one word, any other words? Because we got to come up with a name for it, otherwise, [35:13] it won't be parallel. We need four names here. I need some help. Okay, it's the recovery [35:19] zone, right? Now, if I were to ask you, "Where is it that you spend most of your time at [35:26] work? Where is it then you spend most of your at work when you're not in a performance zone?" [35:32] How many people would say, "Oh, I spend my time in the recovery zone. I'm just chilled [35:35] out, relaxed, kicked back?" How many people would say it's the survival zone? How many [35:43] people would say it's the--a burn out zone? Okay, we've got 8 answers and a hundred people [35:49] in the room. How many people refuse to answer? The answer in most of your case is by, simply [35:56] by elimination, it's going to be that upper left zone. It's going to be somewhere in that [36:00] upper left zone when you're not in upper right. I'm not suggesting for a moment that you're [36:04] not spending significant amounts of time in upper right, I hope you are, but I also know [36:09] that the likelihood is in the face of all the things you face that you have to deal [36:13] that you're not spending all of your time there and there are probably a significant [36:16] amount of times you're not. Now, that means... >> Well, are we in the right most...? [36:23] >> SCHWARTZ: Where are you right now? Well, everybody here is way up in the high positive [36:26] because you're listening to this. I don't know where you are right now but I'm hoping [36:35] against all hope that you are here with me in upper right. I know I'm there and I'm the [36:40] person who's the--I'm the person who's generating the most energy. So, it would be hard for [36:46] you to be depressed with me running around like a chicken with my head cutoff trying [36:51] to entertain you. So the recovery zone is not a place where you spend much time, is [36:56] it? Because the recovery zone from your perspective is the sign that you are a slacker, that's [37:03] where people go to slack. When are you supposed to be in the recovery zone? Vacation, no, [37:09] never, never. That's the modern world, never. Who goes on vacation? How many people here [37:17] went on a vacation in the last year and didn't answer email during the vacation? Well that's [37:22] pretty good so--but that's only 6 percent of the room and that's probably about accurate, [37:26] right? Okay. So the recovery zone gets no respect. The recovery zone gets no respect [37:33] and the biggest--the biggest insight in some ways that I'm going to be able to share with [37:38] you today is an insight that has to do with shifting the locus or the movement that characterizes [37:47] your day in terms of energy states. So right now what we know is--right now what we know [37:53] is that in the course of the day, depending on what happens, you end up being pulled reactively [37:59] into this zone by certain events. I'm I--were we on that page together? Okay. So all day [38:05] long depending on how well or badly the day goes, you have some movement between these [38:10] two zones that it gets overwhelming, you end up down in this zone. This zone is off limits. [38:15] It's never even existed here at Google even though there's plenty of reason for it to, [38:19] you know, there are plenty of opportunities for you to live there. Very people are spending [38:23] a whole lot of time there. You laughed when I said it. Now, what I'm going to suggest [38:28] to you is a paradigm shift, a profound paradigm shift in how you think about performance because [38:35] what we learned is that the best movement for you to be making in the course of the [38:39] day is intermittently and intentionally between upper right and lower right, because we are [38:45] not designed as machines, we are rhythmic beings and we are designed--we need to intermittently [38:52] recover energy if want to sustain energy at the highest level. And that brings me to the [38:57] second principle that in order for us to sustain performance, we need to learn to balance the [39:02] expenditure of energy with the intermittent renewal of energy. That's a pretty radical [39:07] notion. Nobody is thinking that it really is performance, valuable for your performance [39:14] to build true renewal intermittently throughout the day. We learned it. I'll take your question [39:21] when we're done. We learned it from athletes. We learned it from athletes because we consistently [39:26] found that the greatest athletes understood something called work-rest ratios. They valued [39:32] the recovery of energy as much as they valued the expenditure of energy. They--that's what [39:38] interval training is all about. That's what periodization is all about. It's the recognition [39:44] that you need to, in order to be a great performer, train your capacity for recovery as systematically [39:51] as you train any skill that you have in your life. Recovery is performance specific. It [39:58] affects your ability to perform at a high-level and to perform at a level of high-quality. [40:05] Now, the current style in which most of us operate is this style. We go between flat [40:13] out and flat out. We've got two gears and we don't spend anytime in either one. We get [40:19] to this gear when we've gone flat out for so long that we simply collapse. What I'm [40:25] suggesting to you is that we want to build a very different movement into our lives not [40:32] only for the purposes of performing well but for the purposes of having a life. Now, here's [40:38] the counter-intuitive notion. Imagine the Indianapolis 500 for a moment and the drivers [40:45] who were driving and then I ask you this question, is the driver who wins that raise, the driver [40:50] who drives the fastest for the longest the most continuously? And the answer, since I [40:59] have gotten it immediately in time in short is no, no. The driver who wins is the driver [41:05] who drives the fastest for the longest when he's driving and recovers the most efficiently [41:11] when he's not. What is recovery? It's a pit stop. What do you in the pit stop? In the [41:16] pit stop, you refuel the tank; you do maintenance on the car. If you're effective at that, that's [41:22] a key ingredient and being able to be successful in the raise. The average amount of time changing [41:28] four tires in the pit and changing sometimes the windshield wipers, filling the gas, how [41:34] much time is that spent in the pit on average for a driver? Fifteen seconds is about right. [41:43] Because these people have trained recovery, the pit crews are in fabulous physical shape. [41:48] They are geniuses at ensuring effective recovery; the higher the demand in your life, the more [41:55] the need for renewal. If you are driving in a high-performance car, you've got to drive, [42:00] refuel and maintain that car more frequently. If you are a high-performance human being, [42:05] you need to refuel and maintain more quickly, I mean, more regularly. But here's the deal, [42:12] it's not the quantity of your recovery that matters, it's the quality of your recovery [42:16] that matters. It's how well you recover not how long you recover, just as it's not how [42:21] many hours you work, it's what you get done in the hours that you work. That's why we [42:26] want to train recovery. This is the way we're currently recovering, "I try to keep my coffee [42:31] buzz going till the Martini buzz kicks in." We use artificial stimulants to push us up. [42:38] We use artificial stimulants to pull us down. If you could take control of this, it would [42:44] give you a quality of energy and a quantity of energy that was very different. What we [42:49] want is the performance pulse. And that's grounded in this notion that we are oscillatory [42:55] beings in an oscillatory universe. Why do I say that? Because I like the way it sounds. [43:07] That's what it is. It means we have rhythms. What are the rhythms of our body? Which organs [43:12] are rhythmic in our body? Which bodily systems are rhythmic? The heart. Heart rate goes up [43:20] and down. A great measure of your heart health is what's called heart rate variability. The [43:24] ability to move flexibly up and down in heart rate depending on the demand, what else? Breath. [43:31] Your lungs and your heart, your muscles are meant to contract and then after the stress [43:38] is over to relax if they don't, you get back pain, and neck pain, and knee pain and all [43:42] those things that you come up with structural explanations for that have nothing to do with [43:47] anything except the fact that you are not creating the right rhythm in your life. You [43:52] said the right answer. Every system in the body pulses starting with the cells, every [43:58] system until somebody shows it's not through pulses, but we try to live linear lives. We [44:04] tried to live a life that goes in direct opposition the way the body is meant to function. What [44:09] we want to do is create an alignment with our own rhythms, not with the rhythms of the [44:15] computers you are using. They're designed to spend energy in a linear continuous way [44:20] but you are not. So, not only--it's not only true that--it's not only true that you have [44:33] a need to recover but you have a need to recover in a very particular way. The circadian rhythm [44:41] is this 24-hour rhythm and by the way it's another rhythm of day or night that exists [44:45] in the universe. At night you're meant to be asleep. In the day you're meant to be awake. [44:49] You're meant to move between the expenditure of energy and then the recovery of energy. [44:53] We all know about that even though we violated at great cost to ourselves. Because I can't [44:59] go into the fierce costs of not getting enough sleep in this talk, I invite you again to [45:05] go on our website where we put on the homepage, the 60 minutes piece about sleep that ran [45:10] two or three weeks ago. It that doesn't shock you into sleeping more, making sleep more [45:15] important, nothing I say will be able to do it. Having said that, it's also important [45:21] during the day. At night we've got a thing called the basic rest activity cycle which [45:26] means you sleep, you go from a light stage of sleep, rapid eye movement, down slowly [45:34] into a deep delta sleep over a period of 90 to a 120 minutes all through the night. If [45:40] you go through that cycle completely, you're getting a good period of sleep. If you get [45:44] woken up in the middle of it, it interrupts the quality of your sleep. Now, what's so [45:48] fascinating is that exist during the day too at a higher stake of physiological arousal? [45:54] In other words, every 90 to 120 minutes we move from a high state of physiological arousal [45:59] slowly down as you're moving right now into a physiological drop. At the end of 90 minutes, [46:05] 120 minutes if it's a really high, if you're in a low demand situation, but in that 90 [46:10] to 120 minute window, your body is screaming at you, give me a break. But you override [46:17] it. You override it with coffee; you override it with diet coke; you override it with most [46:22] of all cortisol, adrenalin, and noradrenalin with your body's own speed. You override it [46:28] by going into the upper left quadrant. You override it by forcing stimulants through [46:35] your body that are not serving you well. So what we really want to do to perform at our [46:41] best is to build a rhythmic relationship throughout the day where when you're working, I'm sorry, [46:47] when you're engaged, you're truly engaged; and when you're disengaged, you're truly disengaged [46:52] and you're not living in the gray zone in between. Because when it comes to recovery, [46:58] the more you train recovery, the better you get at it, so it's not a notion of 90 minutes [47:05] on and 90 minutes off, right? Fitness is defined as the speed of recovery. The fitter you are, [47:11] the faster you recover. The more you train yourself to recover, the better you get at [47:17] it, the quicker you will recover. We're talking about sustainable high performance. We're [47:22] talking about the ability to meet very high demand. These are the scientific well-researched [47:29] pieces of core evidence that suggest what it takes to show up everyday here with all [47:35] that you've got. I'm going to skip that slide. And I'm going to say to you that we want to [47:40] move between currently what's happening in our lives. If you wanted to take away a visual [47:45] image to remember, moving all day, as I said just a few moments ago, between this upper [47:49] right and upper left zone, reactively in the face of demand. One of the reasons we move [47:55] there is we ran out of energy. When you get more tired, you get more irritable, you get [47:58] more frustrated, you get more anxious. What you really want to do in your life is you [48:03] want to move to this intentional way of managing your energy so that every 90 to a 120 minutes, [48:10] what you're doing is you're renewing energy. This is the paradigm shift. Right now, you [48:16] live life, most of you, as if you're in a marathon. Meaning, there is a long race out [48:21] ahead, there is no end in sight and so either consciously or unconsciously you pace yourself. [48:28] You pace yourself by not fully engaging at any given time in almost anything because [48:35] if you try to push yourself as hard as you're capable of pushing yourself for an expanded [48:41] period of time, you drop like a stone. So instead of doing that, you find ways to cheat [48:47] on the engagement and expenditure of energy, sometimes aware that you're doing it, sometimes [48:52] not. I'm suggesting to you a really radical idea. Reinvent yourself as a sprinter. What [48:58] is a sprinter? A sprinter comes up to the line, gets down in the crouch, looks down [49:03] to the end of the race, a 100 yards, 200 yards, 400 yards and says, can I fully expand, can [49:10] I bring a hundred percent engagement to this race. And what is the sprinter answer? You [49:15] bet your life, why? Because there's an end line, because there's a finish line, because [49:22] they know that they could do it for a finite period of time, stop and recover. The same [49:28] is true for you if you make it so. You've lost the finish lines in your life. You've [49:33] lost the boundaries. You've lost the stopping points. You live in a state of perpetual and [49:39] I'm accusing you, I apologize for that, many of you do. Many of you do and we're all inclined [49:46] in this way because everything is pushing us in this way. So, we live in this state [49:50] in which we are never setting stopping points. And instead the very things that allow us [50:01] to be connected all the time make it virtually impossible to be disconnected ever; and you [50:07] know what I'm talking about. Here is the deal, how many people in the room would say that [50:14] based on what I've said so far, what I'm saying as a way of thinking about how you operate, [50:22] about how you perform makes fundamental sense to you? It makes sense. Okay, how many of [50:30] you based on what I've told you would say that you're going to walk out of this room [50:35] and starting today, based on what I've told you, you aren't going to fundamentally make [50:39] some changes in your life that are in accordance with everything I've said and please be honest? [50:45] So, we're at two or three, okay? So why not? It's not my fault. Let me tell you that first. [50:52] It's not my fault. The reason that you're not going to is because we're creatures of [50:56] habit. Because what you did yesterday is what you're going to do today and do again tomorrow. [51:01] We are remarkably automatic creatures. We need to take this into account when we're [51:06] making change in our life. We need to recognize that our prefrontal cortex, our conscious [51:11] thinking is not the best way to make change. What we need to do instead is we need to co-op [51:16] the autonomic nervous system. We need to co-op the part of our physiology that gets things [51:22] done automatically by training our self through regular repetition to do the things so that [51:31] it shows up without our having to think about it. That's the final energy management principle. [51:36] To manage your energy more optimally, you have to build what we call positive rituals. [51:40] These are highly specific behaviors that become automatic over time. So what I'm suggesting [51:46] to you is that you think about, when you leave here today, you think about one of those answers [51:53] on that energy audit that upsets you, that makes you recognize it's incurring or creating [52:00] a really high cost in your life. And think about what could I do to ritualize a change [52:07] of behavior that would make it possible for me to get a "no" answer to that question I [52:12] have a "yes" answer too. So, if were something like working out for example, I want to give [52:17] you a very simple example, and you said to me, "Tony, I'm so inspired by what you said, [52:21] I realized that working out would not only be good for my physical energy but it would [52:25] be a great thing for my emotional and my energy and for my focus. I'm all with you. I'm going [52:29] to start doing it tomorrow and I'm going to do it three days a week from now on." What [52:33] are the odds you're going to succeed? Very low, why, it's not specific enough, it's not [52:39] precise enough. When are you going to do it? You're not going to do it if you don't set [52:43] a time because you've already got tons of things to do and you're going to default right [52:47] back into them under any kind of pressure. The only way you're going to do it is if you [52:52] take something out of your life that is currently in that slot by designating that time as surely [52:58] as you designate important meeting here at Google. So, if you now say to me, "Tony, I'm [53:02] going to work out Monday, Wednesday, and Friday 7:00 a.m. I'm going to wake up at 6:45. I've [53:08] got a gym down the street for me. I'm going to set out my clothes the night before in [53:13] order to do that. I'm going to do cardiovascular for 30 minutes on Mondays and Wednesday. I'm [53:17] going to do strength training for 30 minutes on Friday." Now, you're talking turkey. And [53:22] here's what happens, you know, it's a ritual when you've done it for long enough that when [53:27] you don't do it, it feels worse than it does to use the energy to do it. And any of you [53:32] who is--who are working out now, regularly, know what I'm talking about. That--it isn't [53:37] necessarily easy to work out and there are many times when you might not feel like working [53:42] out, but if you don't do it, you feel worse. That is what the ritual is about. I wish we [53:46] had the time to be able to, actually, build in this room some rituals but we will have [53:51] this workshop that will intermittently be offered at Google and you'll have the opportunity [53:56] to really come in and do this work if it interests you. For the moment, what I want to suggest [54:03] is that you take a shot at building a ritual, because you can have your first experience [54:09] without me and without much more description. Take in the next hour, because if you wait [54:16] more than an hour, your motivation is going to go down. So if you take it in the next [54:20] hour, and look for a way to define a ritual that's highly specific in time, highly specific [54:27] in the behavior itself, and that is doable; that is biting all something you could chew. [54:34] If you're not working out at all, for example, don't build in five workouts a week of 30 [54:39] minutes of running. Walk, Monday, Wednesday, and Friday for 15 minutes in the middle of [54:44] the day. That's also a recovery break. Here's the deal, it's about taking control of your [54:51] life. You think that your life is, you're at the mercy of a lot of other forces but [54:55] you have the capacity to seize it back. And that's what I want to leave you with the message [55:00] to do, to begin to seize it back because it belongs to you. Thank you very much. [55:11] I would be happy to take a few questions. >> WITTENBERG: We have time for a few questions, [55:20] if anybody has something, come on up to the mic. You're all too busy in time for your [55:33] rituals? >> SCHWARTZ: Yeah. [55:34] >> WITTENBERG: Would you mind walking up to the light? [55:35] >> FEMALE: Could you give us some examples of rituals? [55:36] >> WITTENBERG: An example of a ritual. >> SCHWARTZ: An example of a ritual, well, [55:37] I gave you an example to physical ritual. An example of an emotional ritual that we [55:41] found is very powerful is what do you want to do emotionally? What you do want to do [55:45] emotionally is you want to drive as much positive energy into your reservoir as you can because [55:50] we default to negative emotions. It's the way we're constructed biologically. So, the [55:55] more, the more positive energy you have in the system the better off you are. So what [55:59] behaviors could influence your ability to have more positive emotion at you're disposal [56:06] particularly under the pressure? Well, an example--a couple of examples we have are, [56:11] writing a note of appreciation to someone in your life who you think deserves a recognition [56:17] they're not getting enough of turns out to be something that as a remarkably, powerful [56:22] effect on the other person but also on you. And so, one ritual might be, to take once [56:28] or twice a week where you write a note to someone. A second emotional ritual might be [56:32] to, to take it at the very end of the day before you go to sleep or as you're about [56:38] to leave, to take a little inventory, maybe in a journal or a notebook of what's right [56:43] in my life. What are three things that are write in my life right now? Because it's a [56:47] technology of injecting the right fuel into your life. A mental ritual might be something [56:53] like, doing the most important thing first in the morning. Making the first 90 minutes [56:58] of you day everyday or the first 60 minutes an activity that is, from your perspective, [57:04] the one that would provide or create the greatest value over the course of the rest of the day, [57:09] and making that the most important thing you do, instead of, answering your email first [57:13] and being in reactive mode, being at the mercy of somebody else's agenda, making that the [57:18] most important thing. Making it specific in time, planning it the night before is what [57:25] makes it possible to move from an intention into a habit. [57:28] >> MALE: Sir, I just wanted to see if you'd share the example from your book about your [57:34] work with the tennis players, about trying to find the difference between the top few [57:37] tennis players in the world... >> SCHWARTZ: Yeah, I'll tell you this very, [57:39] very quickly. It's the slide I skipped. God bless you. You can't get away with anything [57:46] at Google. What we discovered, when we really discovered the power of renewal was when we [57:51] were watching tennis players, trying to understand what made the difference between the great [57:55] players and the next set of players because we were working with many of the top 200. [58:00] And it was very hard to see from when they were playing what the difference was. One [58:04] day, we were watching--my former partner and I--actually, my former partner was watching [58:10] the top--he was watching two top players on the same court and what he'd noticed was, [58:14] a man named Jim Layer, what he noticed was that between points, these two players were [58:19] doing the exact same set of four sequenced activities. Neither of them was aware that [58:24] they were doing it themselves much less that the other one was doing it. What they were [58:28] accomplishing and what you were asking about was renewal. What they were doing was they [58:32] were systematically using the 20 to 30 seconds between points to refuel their bodies. They [58:39] were doing it by first, turning away from the net so that they left the point behind [58:44] them, switching the racket from the dominant to the non-dominant hands so they allowed [58:48] the arm to relax, starting to play with the strings of the rackets so that they could [58:53] keep their attention narrowly focused on the task at hand, and walking in a way that we [58:58] came to call the "peacock walk" which is to walk like this. Because how you hold yourself [59:04] influences how you feel. So if you feel better, obviously, you are in a position to perform [59:10] better. So, those four sequenced set of activities led to heart rate drop when we started measuring [59:17] it of somewhere around one heartbeat per second. So, the great players were getting 20 to 30 [59:23] heartbeats of recovery between every point and the players who weren't doing this sequenced [59:29] set of recovery activities were getting virtually none. [59:32] >> MALE: So, your points are very well-taken. But somewhere along the line you made an assumption [59:39] that I don't quite agree with. You're assuming that we're oscillating between the high energy, [59:44] between positive and negative feelings whereas I think we're actually--I find myself oscillating [59:49] between the high and low energy. So I'm going to go to lunch afterwards, and after lunch, [59:53] I'm going to have this post-lunch low and I'm not going to feel negative feelings towards [59:57] people. I'm just going to feel, sort of, tired and wanting to sleep. [60:00] >> SCHWARTZ: Yeah, and--you know, I can tell you that if you learn to manage your energy [60:05] more skillfully and build recovery periods starting an hour and a half after you first [60:14] get to work, and work intensely, and then, consciously and intentionally recover effectively, [60:22] the recovery will mean that you won't come out of lunch with the afternoon law. How do [60:26] I know that? I know that 'cause it doesn't happen to me. I know that because I used to [60:30] be dead tired in the afternoon. Now, you can't overcome the core physiology so you are going [60:36] to be more tired at 2:30 or 3:00 trying to do a task than you would at 10:00, which is [60:40] why you ought to be doing the high demand kinds of activities, the really complex activities [60:45] earlier in the day or pass that circadian trough. But, I will promise you that you will [60:53] get a much more even availability of energy if you more regularly and intermittently build [61:00] in periods of recovery. >> WITTENBERG: So, that's all the time we [61:03] have. Tony will be up here for questions after and we're also going to go to lunch. So anybody [61:07] who'd like to join Tony for lunch, please come up here afterwards. And let's thank Tony [61:12] so much for his time here.