UK Politician Rupert Lowe Demands Mass Welfare Repeal to Halt Migration

PowerfulJRE

The Restore Britain leader claims Tony Blair's constitutional reforms and a politically paralyzed judiciary intentionally eroded national sovereignty to create a collectivist dependency culture.

AI-assisted summary of Joe Rogan Experience #2524 - Rupert Lowe — original source. Check the original for full context.

Source published: 2026-07-08

Detailed notes

## Background Published on July 8, 2026, by the PowerfulJRE channel on YouTube, this episode of the Joe Rogan Experience features British politician Rupert Lowe. The page description highlights Lowe as the leader of Restore Britain and the Member of Parliament for Great Yarmouth since 2024.

## TL;DR In this episode, Rupert Lowe and Joe Rogan discuss what they view as the terminal decline of post-war Britain, attributing it to mass migration, globalist agendas, and institutional overreach rooted in a collectivist ideology. Lowe focuses heavily on the societal impacts of illegal immigration, parallel legal systems, and the suppression of data surrounding inner-city grooming gangs due to institutional fear of being labeled racist. The conversation also explores the legacy of Blair-era policies, the hollowing out of the British economy through state dependency, and a mutual critique of modern media, corporate capture, and university indoctrination.

## Atmosphere & style The atmosphere of the conversation is intensely serious, urgent, and deeply critical of modern Western institutions, carrying the weight of an outsider warning against systemic societal collapse. There is a palpable sense of shared skepticism between Rogan and Lowe as they dissect state overreach, historical revisionism, and corporate media control. The dynamic feels like a high-stakes, analytical debriefing that shifts from grim warnings about cultural incompatibility to a passionate defense of meritocracy, free speech, and individual liberty.

## Key takeaways - [00:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=1s) Post-war British elites intentionally integrated into a European superstate, operating under the philosophical belief of architects Jean Monnet and Altiero Spinelli that nation-states cause European wars. - [03:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=180s) Britain's 1975 entry into the European Economic Community was framed as purely economic, but the 1997 introduction of the euro was a push for financial integration designed to turn the UK into a vassal state. - [05:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=304s) The fundamental political divide is between European collectivism and the individualist DNA found in the US Constitution, with Tony Blair accelerating immigration and passing legal acts to serve a collectivist model. - [06:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=411s) The UK has shifted from a post-war high-trust society into a state that arrests roughly 12,000 people annually solely for social media posts. - [10:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=650s) A woke judiciary limits the deportation of illegal migrants arriving on small boats, while costly infrastructure like the Bibby Stockholm housing barge remains completely redundant and unused. - [13:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=792s) The British government actively tolerates unrecognized Sharia courts, running the risk of societal destabilization similar to historical demographic shifts seen in Lebanon. - [16:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=1012s) An independent, crowdfunded inquiry into UK grooming gangs revealed that institutions suppress perpetrator ethnicity data out of a fear of being labeled racist and to secure inner-city block votes. - [44:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=2662s) Lowe's independent report conservatively estimates that at least 250,000 rapes have occurred across 147 identified hotspots, with syndicates deeply tied to organized crime networks. - [53:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=3220s) Major legacy media outlets like the BBC and Sky News ignored the grooming gang scandals, prompting Lowe to advocate for 'responsibly defunding the BBC' over its institutional bias. - [58:55](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=3535s) The Fabian Society, whose historical members advocated eugenics, has deep ties to current Labour leadership and aims for a philosophy that mirrors a USSR-style dependency culture. - [01:01:53](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=3713s) Modern academic systems push a socialist, equity-driven agenda that purges alternative viewpoints, penalizes competition, and leaves students unequipped for open debate. - [01:10:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=4222s) A massive portion of UK wealth is concentrated in the risk-averse baby boomer generation, while skyrocketing living costs leave the younger demographic feeling like the economic system is rigged. - [01:18:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=4734s) The COVID-19 pandemic induced severe state overreach, neighbor-on-neighbor surveillance, and corporate capture of media, which silenced alternative treatments like Ivermectin to maintain Emergency Use Authorizations. - [01:28:28](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=5308s) Compliance, diversity initiatives, and the 'homeless industry' have transformed into highly lucrative global operations that strip individual responsibility while generating massive wealth for non-profits. - [01:37:41](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=5861s) Two-tier policing handles the native population with hostility and aggressively shuts down native demonstrations while showing distinct leniency toward massive pro-Palestinian marches. - [01:39:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=5992s) Institutional anxiety and a paralysis over race trace back to the police handling of the Steven Lawrence murder in the late 1990s, causing authorities to hush up crimes against the white population. - [01:41:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=6072s) To counter unchecked mass migration, Restore Britain advocates a 'hostile environment' policy framework to strip welfare and housing benefits from non-integrating migrants. - [01:45:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=6337s) The multiplication of 'quangos' since the Blair era has hollowed out the British economy, causing the state to account for over 50% of the nation's GDP and driving away wealthy non-domiciled entrepreneurs. - [01:59:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=7180s) With Keir Starmer stepping down, incoming Prime Minister Andy Burnham can avoid a snap election until 2029 despite being named in regional grooming gang reports for past administrative failures.

## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=1s) Post-War Politics and the Diminishing of the Nation State

Joe Rogan opens the podcast by thanking Bret Weinstein, Jordan Peterson, and Elon Musk for helping connect him with British politician Rupert Lowe. Lowe notes that he is scheduled to see Musk on Sunday and praises him as an incredible supporter, emphasizing that "Britain's in bad shape" and needs all the help it can get. Rogan steers the conversation directly toward the core reason for Lowe's visit: a crowdfunded report detailing the existence of "rape gangs" operating in the UK in 2026. Rogan expresses disbelief and asks how the media and politicians are receiving the reality of actual rape gangs being ignored or downplayed.

Lowe explains that the roots of this issue trace back to the aftermath of World War II. He asserts that the post-war British elite decided to diminish the power of the nation state to facilitate integration into a European superstate—the eventual European Union (EU). When Rogan questions why the elites felt the need to weaken national sovereignty, Lowe explains that Britain emerged from the war as a proud, uninvaded nation state. Conversely, continental Europe had suffered mass dislocation. The architects of the EU, such as Jean Monnet and Altiero Spinelli, believed that the nation state itself was the root cause of catastrophic European wars, dating from Napoleon through the Kaiser to Hitler. To replace nationalism, European elites prioritized multiculturalism and open borders. Lowe traces the genesis of the modern rape gangs directly to this decades-long "multicultural invasion" of Europe.

[03:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=180s) The "Long Deceitful Plan" and Saving the Pound

Rogan pauses the conversation to clarify if this erosion of patriotism and national exceptionalism was a deliberate, long-term strategy. Lowe confirms it was a "long deceitful plan" implemented by European elites working in tandem with the British establishment. He recounts how Britain initially joined the European Economic Community (EEC) in 1975 under the guise of a purely economic union. However, the elites quickly pushed for political integration. When political integration stalled, they attempted financial integration in 1997 with the introduction of the euro.

This financial push marked Lowe's first entry into politics, when he stood as a Member of Parliament (MP) to "save the British pound." He argues that losing a national currency means losing sovereignty, noting that Britain's gold reserves were slated to be shipped to Frankfurt, Germany, effectively turning the UK into an irreversible "vassal state." Alongside Sir James Goldsmith, Lowe and his allies secured enough votes to force the political establishment to promise a referendum before adopting the euro. Saving the pound ultimately paved the way for the 2016 Brexit referendum. Lowe describes the EU as an "unaccountable European socialist protectionist superstate" that stands in direct opposition to the body of England, which desires an accountable parliament in Westminster.

[05:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=304s) Individualism vs. Collectivism and the Changing Demographics

When Rogan asks if this coordination extended to elites in the United States, Lowe states he believes it was less coordinated with America, though he questions whether the Democrats under Joe Biden began working with the World Economic Forum (WEF) through US Aid programs. Lowe contrasts the statist DNA of Europe with the political structure of America, praising the US Constitution and the Founding Fathers for creating a system that returns power to the individual. He summarizes the ideological divide as the "age-old battle between individualism and collectivism."

Lowe details how immigration accelerated over the decades to serve this collectivist model. While early waves like the Windrush generation brought people from Africa and the Caribbean to fill labor shortages, the rules of the EU permanently embedded the concept of "freedom of movement." The immigration numbers grew gradually for 30 to 50 years, but accelerated dramatically when Tony Blair took office in 1997. Lowe accuses Blair and his cohorts of undermining historical constitutional law by passing a raft of legislation—including the Human Rights Act (which embedded the European Convention on Human Rights, or ECHR), the creation of the Supreme Court, and the Equalities Act. Lowe argues these legal shifts empowered a multicultural society at the direct expense of the British people.

[06:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=411s) High-Trust Societies and the Genesis of the Rape Gangs

Lowe characterizes the breakdown of British law and order as a clash between "clanish societies" and "high-trust societies." Historically, post-war Britain was a high-trust nation completely at peace with itself—so much so that Lee Kuan Yew famously modeled Singapore's development on it, noting features like honesty boxes for newspapers in London. When mass migration brought populations from South Asian countries into this environment, it created what Lowe calls a "cultural oil and water mix."

The conversation shifts to the extreme modern consequences of this societal deterioration. Rogan points out the shocking reality that the UK has arrested roughly 12,000 people a year simply for social media posts. Lowe, who is 68 years old and serving as an MP for Great Yarmouth and leader of Restore Britain, describes the situation as "shocking." He states that his entire political career—from fighting the Maastricht Treaty to serving as a Member of the European Parliament (MEP) for the Brexit Party—has been a fight against an unaccountable state that punishes individualism.

[10:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=650s) Illegal Migration and the Burden on the Taxpayer

Rogan asks if unchecked immigration is still actively ongoing. Lowe confirms that illegal migrants continue to arrive via small boats across the English Channel. Under current treaties and laws, they cannot be easily deported, a problem Lowe blames on a judiciary and Supreme Court that he characterizes as a "woke quango" and corrupt. He reveals that the single largest wave of immigration actually occurred under Conservative Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who allowed hundreds of thousands of people into the country, transforming them into a massive burden on the British taxpayer.

Through his parliamentary questions, Lowe has been able to scrutinize official government contracts regarding asylum seekers. He highlights the *Bibby Stockholm*, a housing barge that cost the British taxpayer £1.5 billion and now sits completely redundant and unused.

* **Taxpayer-Funded Amenities:** Lowe notes that government contracts for illegal migrants guarantee hotel-style comforts, including dedicated laundry services, taxi services, and specific dietary food requirements, before settling these populations across the country. * **Lack of Data:** When Rogan compares the crisis to the US southern border—where an estimated 10 million people entered over a four-year span—and asks how many migrants are currently in British hotels, Lowe admits, "I don't think the government knows."

[13:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=792s) Parallel Legal Systems and Historical Precedents

Lowe outlines his party's "mass deportation document," which details the constitutional fixes required to practically detain and deport individuals who entered or remain in the country illegally, alongside foreign nationals currently occupying British prisons. Beyond illegal status, Lowe expresses deep concern for legal migrants who remain entirely dependent on welfare, hold values fundamentally different from the nation's Christian heritage, and choose to live segregated from mainstream society under their own parallel legal system.

Lowe confirms to a stunned Rogan that the British government actively tolerates unrecognized Sharia courts operating inside England. "It's rather like they're policing their own people under their own laws," Lowe explains. Rogan strongly objects to this tolerance, arguing that if you move to a Western country, you must abide by its laws. He notes that while the US is traditionally a melting pot of cultures, importing fundamentalist cultures that lack basic respect for women or Western norms creates a severe societal vulnerability. Rogan warns that Western societies are so desperate to appear inclusive and progressive that they risk handing their resources and sovereignty over to parallel systems, drawing a historical parallel to the collapse of ancient Rome and Greece. Lowe agrees, pointing to the historical precedent of Lebanon, which was a confident, prosperous Christian nation when it achieved independence in 1948 before demographic shifts fundamentally destabilized its society.

[16:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=1012s) The Collapse of Trust and the Grooming Gang Report

Rupert Lowe traces the breakdown of high-trust, open societies by pointing to the historical precedent of Beirut in the 1960s. Widely regarded as an enlightened and vibrant paradise with excellent wine and immense personal freedom, Beirut dramatically collapsed into a devastating civil war involving the Druze, Maronite Christians, and Muslims once the Muslim population surpassed a critical threshold of approximately 15%. Today, Lebanon is effectively controlled by the Iranian-backed militant group Hezbollah. Lowe parallels this cultural and demographic shift to the contemporary United Kingdom, arguing that the British government—particularly the Labour Party—has willfully ignored a massive, systemic crisis involving grooming and rape gangs.

To address this state failure, Lowe and a group of concerned citizens bypassed the government to produce their own independent inquiry. Crowdfunded by over 20,000 British citizens who raised approximately £600,000, the inquiry was launched because the government consistently refused to establish a statutory inquiry. Lowe alleges that the political establishment has protected these networks to secure the crucial "Muslim block vote" in inner cities, which has historically relied on the postal voting system to keep Labour in power. Although some of these demographics are now shifting their support toward independent Muslim candidates—some of whom Lowe sits near in Parliament—the political class has long put power ahead of principle.

* **The Crowdfunded Inquiry:** Raised roughly £600,000 from 20,000 donors to investigate grooming gangs because of government inaction. * **The Postal Vote Block:** Lowe argues that the postal voting system has been heavily manipulated in inner-city Islamic populations to secure block votes for the Labour Party. * **The Catalyst:** Lowe notes that public statements by Elon Musk helped trigger widespread awareness of the scale and longevity of the grooming gang issue in the UK.

---

[19:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=1196s) The Grooming Gang Inquiry and Cultural Clashes

Lowe attributes the public’s ignorance of the grooming crisis to a total failure of the mainstream media, which has abandoned its duty to hold the state accountable. Led by rape gang victim Sammy Woodhouse—who tragically has a child by her rapist—and presided over by barrister Graeme Smith, the year-long inquiry compiled extensive witness bundles and held a two-week public hearing in London. The inquiry’s findings highlighted a severe cultural clash between a high-trust Christian view of women and the Islamic view of women. Lowe points out that the perpetrators are predominantly Muslim men of Pakistani origin—specifically from the Mirpur region—alongside offenders from Bangladesh, Somalia, and Eritrea. While acknowledging that white individuals also commit sexual offenses, Lowe stresses that the scale and targeted nature of these grooming networks against white, working-class British girls is uniquely horrific.

The state has actively suppressed court transcripts and neglected to collect ethnicity data on perpetrators to avoid exposing the failure of its "multicultural experiment." Lowe references Enoch Powell's highly controversial 1968 "Rivers of Blood" speech, which warned of these exact societal fractures. Since the premiership of Tony Blair, British institutions have been paralyzed by the fear of being labeled racist, allowing a culture of "unconscious bias" and woke, DEI-driven ideologies to permeate every level of the police, NHS, and social services.

> "There is a cultural difference of opinion between an open high trust Christian view of women particularly and the Islamic view of women... they are considered to be meat."

* **The Inquiry Team:** Led by victim Sammy Woodhouse and managed by barrister Graeme Smith, utilizing voluntary testimonies over a two-week hearing in London. * **Historical Precedents:** Previous investigations, such as the Jay Report (2014) and the Casey Report, confirmed the existence of these gangs, but the state dismissed them as isolated, localized incidents. * **Lack of Data:** Lowe has used parliamentary questions to expose how the police and NHS fail to properly record the ethnicity of offenders, shielding the state from admitting the failure of multiculturalism.

---

[25:27](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=1527s) Free Speech, Gun Ownership, and State Overreach

Joe Rogan and Lowe discuss how the grip of woke ideology has slightly loosened in recent years, credit for which Rogan gives to Donald Trump's political influence and Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter, which restored legitimate free speech. Rogan expresses disbelief that the British public tolerates the arrest of roughly 12,000 people per year for social media posts, remarking that people would be "up in arms" if they weren't entirely disarmed. Lowe, who owns a farm and legitimately keeps firearms, recounts a personal ordeal where his political rivals in Reform UK tried to politically assassinate him in early 2025.

Opponents made false claims that Lowe had threatened to hit Reform chairman Zia Yusuf and was bragging in Parliament that he was going to shoot him. Based solely on these unsubstantiated accusations, four armed police officers arrived at Lowe's home at 9:30 PM and spent hours confiscating all of his guns and ammunition, despite his clean record and status as an MP. It took Lowe five to six months to secure their return. He notes that the British state is systematically using restrictive licensing laws to destroy shooting sports, clay pigeon shooting, and game hunting. This disarmament agenda dates back to the late 1990s, when the entire country’s handguns were banned following a single mass shooting in Dunblane, forcing law-abiding citizens—including Lowe's late father, who shot pistols for Oxford University—to surrender their firearms.

* **Armed Police Raid:** In early 2025, four armed officers raided Lowe's home from 9:30 PM to 11:45 PM to seize his licensed firearms over a false political accusation. * **The Dunblane Ban:** Handguns were banned across the UK in the late 1990s following the Dunblane massacre, stripping all sporting shooters of their pistols. * **Lucy Connolly Case:** A woman was sentenced to 32 months in prison for an emotional social media post about the Southport stabbings, which she deleted after only four hours.

---

[28:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=1698s) Two-Tier Policing and the Narrative Against the West

Lowe highlights the stark contrast in how the British state administers justice, citing cases of "two-tier policing" where the native white population is treated with hostility. He contrasts the harsh treatment of online commentators with violent crimes, pointing out that Axel Rudakubana successfully murdered three young girls in Southport despite being on the radar of the government's Prevent counter-extremism programme. In another recent case involving Henry Novak, police officers arriving at a stabbing scene disbelieved the bleeding victim, handcuffed him—which arguably reopened his wounds and caused him to drown in his own blood—while leaving the actual murderer completely un-handcuffed.

Rogan asks whether this societal self-loathing and anti-white narrative in the UK was deliberately designed or if it is just a passive reaction to historical colonial guilt. Lowe firmly believes it is by design. He argues that globalist organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF) operate under a misguided, altruistic belief that Anglo-Saxon nations have dominated too much of the world's resources and must be dismantled in favor of global welfare. This aligns with Klaus Schwab's infamous "you will own nothing and you will be happy" mantra, which Rogan laughs off as something straight out of an Orwellian novel. Pointing to George Orwell's time fighting in the Spanish Civil War, Lowe praises the author's prescient foresight and healthy disrespect for collectivist statism. Rogan laments that the modern world has surpassed Orwell's worst nightmares, resulting in an absurd society that subverts its own greatness by coddling backward cultures, destroying borders, and abandoning basic human rights under the guise of avoiding "racism."

[34:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=2052s) The Fragility of Liberty and the Challenge of Integration

Joe Rogan and Rupert Lowe open this portion of the conversation by stressing that criticizing a lack of assimilation is not inherently racist. Rogan underscores that while individuals should have the freedom to practice any religion, a severe problem arises when religious tenets directly violate established, fair laws or when an influx of people takes over entire communities and institutes archaic laws. "Civilization is not as sturdy as we like to think it is," Rogan observes, describing it as flimsy and capable of going sideways rapidly if left unmonitored. Lowe agrees fully, invoking Margaret Thatcher’s strong stance on protecting liberty. He argues that the cornerstone of a functioning society is that everyone must remain equal under the law.

Lowe reflects on Britain's historical legacy as a highly tolerant society that historically welcomed persecuted groups, such as European Jews and French Huguenots, who successfully integrated and contributed to the nation. He asserts that sensible immigration must be limited, targeted, and strictly conditional on newcomers accepting the host nation's laws, culture, and core values. Rogan pushes back with a difficult pragmatic question regarding the mechanics of enforcement: what can a country actually do if a demographic lawfully achieves citizenship but then shifts toward implementing parallel legal structures like Sharia law? He challenges the feasibility of mass deportation rhetoric, asking whether authorities are expected to knock on doors and physically pull people from their homes. Lowe states that the vital first step is to robustly halt the initial illegal crossings, noting that under international law, migrants traveling through multiple safe European nations should not be arriving on British shores to claim asylum.

- **Historical Tolerance:** Lowe highlights Britain's history of sheltering persecuted minorities, explicitly referencing Jews and French Protestants. - **The Mechanics of Deportation:** Rogan points out the immense logistical and ethical hurdles of executing mass deportations once individuals are established. - **International Law:** Lowe argues that crossing multiple safe countries invalidates legitimate claims of immediate asylum under broader international legal frameworks.

---

[36:33](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=2193s) The Reality of Cross-Channel Migration and Welfare Incentives

When pressed by Rogan for specific numbers on illegal immigration in Britain, Lowe admits that tracking the exact figure is notoriously difficult, though his organization's working estimate sits between 1.8 and 2 million people currently living in the UK illegally. The daily arrivals across the English Channel fluctuate wildly based on the weather; on calm days, upwards of a thousand individuals can cross in overcrowded dinghies, whereas rough seas bring the number down to zero due to the sheer danger involved. Lowe reveals a point of political frustration, noting that the British government pays France over half a billion pounds annually to curb these crossings, yet the flow continues largely unabated. Instead of deterrence, British border patrols pick up the migrants, provide them with water, and settle them into hotels while their asylum applications are processed.

Lowe argues that the vast majority of these arrivals are economic migrants rather than genuine asylum seekers, incentivized by a "woke culture" that fails to protect British national interests. He describes the system as a massive economic pull factor: individuals from deeply impoverished nations realize that simply reaching English soil triggers instantaneous access to taxpayer-funded housing and money. Adding to the controversy, Lowe claims that migrants are routinely placed at the top of waiting lists for critical services, such as dental care under the National Health Service (NHS), while tax-paying British citizens face prolonged delays. When a bewildered Rogan asks why leaders allow this, Lowe attributes it to a deeply misguided, idealized view held by the political establishment, which insists on treating economic migrants as vulnerable refugees.

- **Estimated Illegal Population:** Lowe’s report estimates between 1.8 million and 2 million illegal residents in the UK. - **Daily Crossings:** Numbers can peak at 1,000 migrants in a single day when the English Channel is calm. - **Financial Commitments:** The UK pays France over £500 million a year to help stop illegal channel crossings. - **Welfare and NHS Priority:** Lowe asserts that migrants receive immediate housing, welfare, and accelerated access to NHS dental treatments over citizens.

---

[39:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=2352s) Parallel Societies and the Ideological Blind Spots of Progressivism

The dialogue shifts to the emergence of parallel societies, with Lowe noting that large tracts of the UK now feature Islamic settlements operating almost entirely outside mainstream British culture. Rogan draws a parallel to the United States, pointing to Dearborn, Michigan, which recently hosted a massive Islamic parade featuring tens of thousands of people. Rogan shares a sharp political irony regarding Dearborn: local progressive liberals enthusiastically championed the influx of different cultures under the banner of inclusivity, but as soon as conservative Islamic leaders gained political power in the municipality, one of their first actions was to ban the pride flag. Lowe is unsurprised, noting that these communities hold very rigid, traditional views that directly clash with progressive ideals.

This prompt leads Rogan to mock advocacy groups like "Queers for Palestine," pointing out the dark absurdity of the contrast between Western progressive activism and the harsh realities of life under fundamentalist regimes—a contradiction often highlighted online by the dark humor of the "Palestine for Queers" meme depicting individuals being thrown off roofs. Lowe adds his own example from British politics, mentioning that the co-leader of the Green Party is a gay Jewish man who would face severe, existential danger if fundamentalist groups ever achieved true governing power in the UK. Both speakers marvel at the intense cognitive dissonance required by Western progressives to support cultures that are overtly patriarchal, reduce women to second-class citizens, and enforce extreme moral laws.

- **Dearborn, Michigan:** Rogan highlights Dearborn as an American example of a dense Islamic community where the city council ultimately banned the pride flag. - **The Green Party Example:** Lowe points out the irony of a gay, Jewish political figure leading a UK progressive party that frequently aligns with ideologies hostile to his identity. - **Fear of the "Racist" Label:** Rogan argues that the terrifying social power of being labeled a racist forces progressives to adopt and defend cultures that completely oppose their own values.

---

[40:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=2440s) Cultural "Oil and Water" and the Reality of Honor Killings

Rogan and Lowe discuss the extreme legal and cultural disparities regarding the treatment of women in conservative Islamic societies, referencing severe punishments for adultery and the harrowing reality of honor killings, where fathers or brothers murder female relatives to cleanse perceived family shame. Rogan expresses disbelief that modern progressives can overlook these practices, attributing it to a paralyzing social fear of being called racist. Lowe expresses a similar fascination with the Western Me Too movement's total silence regarding what he terms "clannish, tribal cultures." To illustrate the vast divide, Lowe cites data from his team's report regarding Pakistan's legal code, where a woman accusing a man of rape must produce four male witnesses who can explicitly swear they witnessed the act of penetration; failure to do so can result in the victim herself being imprisoned for adultery.

Lowe describes this stark clash of values as a volatile mix of cultural "oil and water" that simply cannot blend. He criticizes the staggering mental gymnastics required to accept these tribal customs as part of modern Britain in the name of progressivism, calling it a cult-like ideology that completely defies common sense. In these tribal framework systems, an individual's primary loyalty belongs strictly to the family and tribe, completely superseding the laws of the host country. Lowe further alleges that certain Hadith interpretations are twisted by bad actors to justify horrific behavior, such as the targeting of non-Muslim women. He explains that within these fringe extremist mindsets, a Western girl who does not dress traditionally is objectified and treated as "meat to be abused."

- **The Four-Witness Rule:** In Pakistan, a woman alleging rape requires four male eyewitnesses to avoid being jailed herself under strict adultery laws. - **Tribal Loyalty over State Law:** Lowe explains that tribal honor and religious edicts completely replace compliance with UK law in parallel communities. - **Incompatibility of Values:** Lowe emphasizes that Western societies have evolved into matriarchal structures that respect and empower women, a dynamic fundamentally at odds with fundamentalist Islamic codes.

---

[44:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=2662s) The British Rape Gang Scandal and Political Correctness in Parliament

Rogan inquires about the specific terminology used in Lowe's newly released inquiry report, focusing heavily on the phrase "rape gangs." Lowe confirms that the terminology is deliberate because these are not isolated, random crimes; rather, they are highly organized, coordinated criminal syndicates that deliberately target, groom, and abuse young girls—some as young as 10 or 11 years old—before trafficking them across different regions of the country. Lowe drops a stunning statistic from their findings, estimating that a minimum of 250,000 rapes have taken place, a figure he considers incredibly conservative due to the state's persistent failure to collect accurate, comprehensive data.

``` +----------------------------------------+---------------------------------------+ | Lowe's Rape Gang Inquiry Data Point | Description / Finding | +----------------------------------------+---------------------------------------+ | Minimum Estimated Victim Count | 250,000 rapes across the United Kingdom| | Identified Hotspots | 147 specific locations documented | | Systemic Scope | Linked directly to organized crime, | | | drug trades, and prostitution networks| +----------------------------------------+---------------------------------------+ ```

Lowe explains that these syndicates are deeply intertwined with the broader drug trade and prostitution rings, uncovering horrific accounts of systemic abuse, psychological torture, and absolute servitude designed to assert total dominance over victims. He argues that this behavior is fueled by an ideology of supremacy, where fundamentalist men are taught to view themselves as superior to women and non-Muslims, whom they view as infidels.

Lowe reflects on his entry into Parliament in July 2024 at the age of 67, recalling his immediate disdain for the politically correct euphemisms used by the establishment. While the media and government long relied on the term "Asian grooming gangs," Lowe rejected it in a shocking House of Commons speech, arguing that the term was a misnomer that unfairly tarnished distinct, uninvolved Asian cultures like the Japanese. Instead, he broke parliamentary taboo by explicitly naming them "Pakistani Muslim rape gangs." He credits Elon Musk's purchase of Twitter for providing a vital free-speech platform that allowed his team to bypass traditional media censorship, publish their findings, and distribute copies of the report to every single Member of Parliament in an effort to force immediate institutional reform.

- **Scale of the Crisis:** The report identifies 147 distinct parts of the UK where these organized grooming networks operate, refuting government claims that it is merely a localized issue. - **Horrific Abuse Profiles:** Testimonies from the inquiry detailed victims being trafficked in the backs of pickups, kept in cages, and subjected to extreme physical degradation. - **Parliamentary Speech:** Lowe details the shockwaves caused in the House of Commons when he abandoned state euphemisms to call the syndicates "Pakistani Muslim rape gangs." - **Alternative Platforms:** Lowe explicitly thanks Elon Musk for creating a free-speech haven on X, which paved the way for other social media networks to allow open discussion of the report.

[51:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=3079s) Reversing the Terminal Decline of Britain

Rupert Lowe establishes his outsider status in British politics, emphasizing that he does not participate for financial gain, as he donates his entire parliamentary salary to charity. He describes himself as a reasonably successful person who has lived a full life outside of Westminster. He recalls his past as a competitive hockey player and his tenure as the chairman of Southampton F.C., during which he built the club's stadium and established its youth academy. He fondly points to the day Southampton reached the FA Cup final in 2003, losing 1–0 to Arsenal, as "the most amazing experience for everybody" and one of the best days of his life. Lowe explains that he stepped into politics simply because "somebody's got to do it" to halt what he views as a terminal decline that could destroy the country by 2029 if left unchecked.

Sitting on the Public Accounts Committee, Lowe claims he witnesses staggering levels of waste, an absence of accountability, and a civil service that fundamentally fails to serve the public. He highlights a national debt rising to nearly 100% of GDP, massive misallocations in military procurement, and fraud within the judiciary. When Joe Rogan remarks that this sounds identical to the systemic issues plaguing America, Lowe agrees that the structural problems are widespread, noting that the United States under Joe Biden suffered from similar mismanagement. He references disclosures by Elon Musk regarding the misallocation of USAID and taxpayer funds globally, claiming some of those funds even trickled down to finance "woke causes" in England. Regardless of whether the driving architects are the World Economic Forum, the Bilderberg Group, or the Council on Foreign Relations, Lowe insists that a collective effort is required to reverse this trajectory, leveraging his own 20 years of experience in the City of London finance sector and multiple businesses to execute the turnaround.

- Lowe donates 100% of his parliamentary salary to charitable causes. - He was the chairman of Southampton F.C. when they built their stadium and reached the 2003 FA Cup Final, losing 1–0 to Arsenal. - Lowe states that Britain's national debt is currently rising to nearly 100% of GDP. - He sits on the Public Accounts Committee, tracking public sector waste and fraud.

[53:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=3220s) Media Monopolies and the BBC's "Poison"

Rogan shifts the conversation back to the grooming gang scandals, asking how anyone can remain in denial when confronted with the raw numbers. Lowe asserts that the Labour Party simply looks the other way and describes their response to crowdfunded demands for a statutory inquiry as completely muted. He expresses profound frustration that major legacy outlets like the BBC and Sky News have completely ignored the issue, while *The Daily Telegraph* provided inadequate coverage and GB News only dedicated a single evening broadcast to it via Patrick Christys. Lowe condemns this blackout as a massive national scandal, particularly targeting the BBC as a "deeply malign organization." He points out the historical irony that the broadcaster was founded in the 1920s by John Reith, a highly principled man, under the noble mandate to "inform, educate and entertain."

Lowe argues that the BBC has outlived its utility in the modern digital landscape. While young audiences migrate to alternative outlets like Breitbart for their news, British citizens are still legally coerced into paying a compulsory TV license fee just to own a television or watch live sports. Rogan attributes this lingering compliance to a generational mindset, explaining that a large percentage of society—particularly older demographics—has been trained to believe that a story is a fringe conspiracy theory unless it is validated by a legacy corporate institution like *The New York Times* or CNN. Because these individuals do not understand the internet or use platforms like X (formerly Twitter), the BBC's silence allows them to safely claim ignorance. Lowe enthusiastically agrees with this summary, declaring that if he ever gets near power, "responsibly defund the BBC" will be one of his very first actions. He claims the network is actively "dripping poison into the veins of Britain every day" by trading objective journalism for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives and LGBTQ+ coverage.

[58:55](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=3535s) The Fabian Society and Historical Revisionism

Lowe traces the ideological roots of Britain's current political climate back to the Fabian Society, an organization founded in the 1880s that counts a vast majority of the Labour Party's front bench—including Prime Minister Keir Starmer—among its members. Lowe points out that famous historical figures like George Bernard Shaw were prominent Fabians. Rogan is left completely stunned when Lowe reveals that the society's official emblem is literally a wolf in sheep's clothing. Producers pull up the coat of arms on screen, showing a black wolf draped in a sheepskin, prompting Rogan to laugh in disbelief at the sheer audacity. "Like they're not even trying to hide it," Rogan remarks, completely fascinated by the flagrant disdain for the public's intelligence, jokingly demanding that his producer Jamie order him a Fabian Society t-shirt "just for a goof." Lowe adds to the shock by noting that the group's foundational members were also original proponents of eugenics.

Turning to the education system, Lowe laments how universities have systematically taught younger generations to have an utter disdain for Western civilization. He expresses pride in British history, reminding Rogan that Britain unilaterally stopped the transatlantic slave trade at an immense financial cost to itself, and argues that British colonial infrastructure left behind a robust framework for the rule of law in countries like India that are now flourishing. He contrasts British colonialism with the significantly more brutal methods utilized by the French and Belgians. Lowe finds it tragic that impressionable young students emerge from higher education completely blind to historical progress, choosing instead to view all Western achievements through a lens of historical atrocities that must be actively punished in the present day.

- The Fabian Society was founded in the 1880s; its prominent early members included playwright George Bernard Shaw. - The society's emblem features a wolf in sheep's clothing, and its members historically advocated for eugenics. - Lowe notes that current Labour leadership, including Keir Starmer, are members of the Fabian Society.

[01:01:53](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=3713s) Capitalism, Indoctrination, and the Death of University Discourse

Rogan launches into an extended critique of modern youth culture and the academic push toward socialism. He expresses bewilderment that students are continually willing to "swallow" the promise of socialism, completely ignoring the reality that every historical attempt has ultimately dissolved into tyranny. He notes that the standard academic defense—that true socialism has simply never been implemented correctly—is completely disconnected from how the real world operates. Rogan argues that anyone who has ever held a childhood job or played a sport understands that there is never an "equality of effort," and that removing the incentive to succeed fundamentally kills human innovation. He credits raw capitalism as the sole driving force behind modern societal miracles like Starlink and beautiful high-definition televisions, noting that the system can be steered humanely and ethically when consumers choose to "vote with your dollars" and boycott corrupt corporations.

The core failure of modern universities, Rogan asserts, is their systematic purging of conservative voices and alternative viewpoints, particularly within sociology, psychology, and history departments. He argues that true intellectual diversity is just as vital as diversity of gender, national origin, or sexual orientation. Without a robust opposing viewpoint to "duke it out" in open debate, students are left completely unprepared for independent life. Rogan severely condemns the practice of silencing speakers, pulling fire alarms, and screaming out protests because students "don't feel safe." He insists that anyone who refuses to communicate or brands their opponents as Nazis to avoid a debate should be completely shunned as the true "enemy of thinking." Lowe strongly concurs, noting that instead of healthy intellectual Darwinism, the United Kingdom's school systems have instituted a "reverse Darwinian theory" where the fundamental desire to compete and win is actively discouraged.

[01:07:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=4035s) Individualism vs. Collectivism in Sports and Society

The conversation begins with a lamentation on the shifting cultural values surrounding competition. In the past, winning a hard-fought game of rugby or hockey was celebrated as a great achievement. Today, however, winning is frequently stigmatized in schools under the guise of forced equity. Joe Rogan points out that the UK lacks the heavy wrestling culture found in US high schools and colleges—a sport where meritocracy is undeniable because success requires absolute hard work. Rupert Lowe frames this shift as part of an age-old ideological struggle between individualism and collectivism. He asserts that the state inherently fears highly successful, independent-minded individuals who can confidently debate ideas, and thus uses taxation and regulation to curb them.

Lowe argues that the UK state actively penalizes hard-working families who want to be self-sufficient rather than dependent on "welfareism." He believes society thrives best when it is built upon successful family businesses and independent communities that pursue truth through open debate. Historically, Lowe notes, many of mankind's greatest inventions emerged from the Anglo-Saxon world precisely because individualism was allowed to flourish. Rogan adds that in America, many breakthroughs came from legal immigrants who specifically sought out the country because they appreciated its unique meritocratic promise.

* **Wrestling as Meritocracy:** Rogan emphasizes that wrestlers understand meritocracy better than almost anyone because the sport leaves zero room for shortcuts. * **Immigrant Perspectives:** Both agree that legal immigrants are often the biggest defenders of national structures and rule of law; in the US, legal immigrants are overwhelmingly against open borders because they take immense pride in the rigorous process they underwent to become citizens.

---

[01:10:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=4222s) The Boomer Wealth Lock and the Economic Rigging of the Young

Lowe turns his attention to generational economics, highlighting how a massive portion of the UK's wealth is tied up in the baby boomer generation. As a self-described "tail-end boomer" at 68, he observes that older cohorts aged 70 to 90 hold the bulk of pension wealth. This has created a widespread aversion to risk, which damages financial markets. Lowe defends risk-taking as the fundamental driver of entrepreneurship and reward, warning that taxing risk out of existence stalls progress. Because older generations are focused entirely on seeing their retirements through safely, capital is not "cascading down" to give young people the same wealth-building opportunities the boomers enjoyed.

Rogan validates this frustration, noting that American youth similarly feel the system is completely rigged against them. He points out that the cost of housing, rent, and groceries has skyrocketed due to rampant inflation. To illustrate the severe erosion of purchasing power, Rogan references an economic statistic showing that what cost $225,000 around 2007 or 2008 has effectively doubled to $450,000 today. Compounding this financial stress is the looming threat of AI taking future jobs and the crushing burden of student loan debt.

---

[01:12:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=4366s) The Illusion of Free Services and the Student Debt Trap

A point of confusion arises when Rogan states he thought the UK offered free higher education. Lowe clarifies that while Scotland still offers free university tuition, England abandoned the practice years ago. Students in the UK now regularly accumulate upwards of £60,000 in debt, which is aggressively compounded by "hideous" interest rates. While the UK has bankruptcy laws, student loans are insulated from them; instead, the debt remains a 30-year liability where the government extracts principal and interest directly from an individual's salary once they start working.

Rogan explains that the American student loan system is even more unforgiving. It stands as the singular type of debt that cannot be wiped out through bankruptcy, outlasting credit card debt and personal loans. In a striking example of the system's severity, Rogan notes that some elderly Americans have their Social Security checks docked to pay off student loans from their youth. Lowe nods in agreement, shifting the blame onto universities pushing "ridiculous courses in sort of humanities" that saddle young people with massive debt, zero practical skills, and "a completely ideologically captured mind."

* **Average UK Student Debt:** It is now commonplace for UK students to accumulate £60,000 in debt. * **US Social Security Garnishments:** Senior citizens in America can face reductions in their Social Security benefits to settle unpaid historical student loans.

---

[01:15:31](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=4531s) Ideological Capture in Higher Education and the Value of Adversity

Rogan describes the typical university experience as an echo chamber where left-leaning, smug professors talk down to impressionable students. He notes that even kids from conservative families get swept up in these academic environments because they want to feel like they are part of a team "going to fix the world." It is often not until these individuals reach their mid-30s, secure real jobs, and start families that they look back and realize how ridiculous those radical ideologies actually were.

To summarize this predictable political trajectory, Rogan brings up the famous quote often attributed to Winston Churchill: *"Show me a young man who's not a liberal and I'll show you a man without a heart. Show me an old man who's not conservative and I'll show you a man without a brain."* Lowe agrees that conservatism is not an absence of kindness, but rather a realistic recognition of human nature. Rogan concludes that weaponizing victimhood or rewarding people for a lack of effort ruins character. True growth, character, and success only stem from facing down adversity and pushing through rough days.

---

[01:18:54](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=4734s) COVID-19 Overreach, "Pure Bloods," and the Rise of Citizen Enforcers

The dialogue takes a personal turn when Lowe proudly reveals that he chose to remain unvaccinated during the pandemic, jokingly using the term "pure blood." Rogan finds the phrase hilarious and asks how Lowe managed to escape the heavy pressure in the UK. Lowe explains that he used to travel frequently to Perth in Western Australia for mining and gold prospecting businesses, but completely stopped traveling once restrictions made it too difficult. Both men share a profound concern over how easily Western governments implemented lockdowns, with Lowe stating that the state "frightened people into submission" and destroyed the vital social fabric young people needed to debate ideas and discover truth.

Rogan praises Sweden's chief epidemiologist, Anders Tegnell, as a brave man who got the pandemic response right by avoiding lockdowns. They express mutual shock at how quickly everyday citizens transformed into authoritarian enforcers for the government. Rogan recalls that cities like Los Angeles offered financial rewards for residents who ratted on neighbors throwing parties. Lowe shares a parallel anecdote from England: he owns a tennis court located out in the middle of nowhere and would invite friends to play outdoor tennis to bypass the "absolutely mad" restrictions. However, he notes that if anyone attempted to play tennis openly within the local village, neighbors would immediately report them to the authorities. Rogan caps the segment by revealing that his own studio production team in California was reported by onlookers simply because their main desk wasn't a full six feet wide.

[01:21:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=4894s) Compliance, Covid-19, and the Loss of Trust in Expertise

Joe Rogan and Rupert Lowe reflect on the surreal nature of the Covid-19 pandemic protocols, with Rogan recounting how people were "ratting on us" for talking close to each other without masks or shaking hands upon entering his studio. To comply with local mandates, the studio was forced to put up a sign, provide a bag of masks, and supply hand sanitizer. Rogan notes the absurdity of enforcing social distancing at his studio desk, which is only five feet wide. Lowe characterizes the entire era as "pathetic," while Rogan describes it as complete nonsense that permanently shattered public trust in health experts and authority. Rogan argues that instead of prioritizing public health, officials were acting to "prop up the pharmaceutical drug cartel" and maximize profits through forced compliance—restricting flying, driving, schooling, and working for anyone with more than 100 employees.

Lowe emphasizes that the heavy-handed mandates severely damaged young people, citing how the UK's National Health Service (NHS) forced its workers to get "the jabs." Both men agree that the vaccines did not work as promised and instead caused major medical issues. Lowe shares that several of his fit friends suffered from myocarditis, strokes, and heart attacks, stating that "everybody knows somebody" who had a horrible reaction. Rogan dismisses anyone claiming not to know someone with side effects as a liar who is likely just protecting their initial political support of the vaccine. Lowe shares that he personally lost friends who viewed him as a direct health risk to their elderly relatives because he chose to remain unvaccinated.

- The studio desk mentioned is 5 feet wide, preventing any true social distancing. - Rogan notes that under the mandates, U.S. companies with more than 100 employees were required to enforce vaccinations. - Lowe shares that his personal circle includes individuals who suffered from myocarditis, strokes, heart attacks, and heart arrhythmia post-vaccination.

---

[01:24:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=5059s) The Ivermectin Controversy and Media Censorship

The conversation shifts to alternative treatments, with Lowe noting that countries like India successfully utilized Ivermectin on a massive scale. Lowe mentions that as a cattle owner, he used to treat his own livestock with Ivermectin, but stresses that it worked effectively for humans too. This prompts Rogan to detail the intense media backlash he faced in the United States after announcing he took the drug. He recounts how CNN ran a multi-day "hit piece" labeling it a "horse dewormer," deliberately ignoring that the drug won a Nobel Prize for its use in human beings to treat conditions like river blindness and dengue fever.

Rogan reveals the extent of the media manipulation, explaining that CNN went so far as to alter the video he posted—where he announced canceling a Nashville concert with Dave Chappelle due to Covid—to make his face look green and sickly. Rogan explains that his doctor threw the "kitchen sink" at the virus, prescribing monoclonal antibodies, a Z-pack, IV vitamins, and Ivermectin, which led to a rapid recovery in three days. He explains that the aggressive media campaign against him was systemic; under U.S. law, an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for a new vaccine requires that no other effective, cheap alternative treatments exist. Rogan also addresses legacy rock musician Neil Young pulling his music from Spotify in protest of Rogan's alleged "vaccine misinformation," calling Young "another old boomer that just watches the news" who unwittingly supported a lying corporate machine. Rogan contrasts this with the massive success seen in regions like Uttar Pradesh, India, which maintained low Covid fatality rates through widespread Ivermectin distribution.

- Ivermectin won a Nobel Prize for its human applications against parasitic diseases like river blindness. - Rogan was scheduled to perform a concert with Dave Chappelle in Nashville when he contracted Covid-19. - Rogan's prescribed treatment regimen included Ivermectin, monoclonal antibodies, a Z-pack, and IV vitamins. - The Indian state of Uttar Pradesh is cited as an example of successful pandemic management using Ivermectin.

---

[01:28:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=5288s) The Corporate Capture of Media and the Corruption Industry

Lowe asserts that governments are fully aware of the damage caused by their pandemic responses but are simply unable to admit it, choosing instead to "gloss over it and move on." Rogan points out that prominent media figures like Chris Cuomo have been thoroughly "destroyed" in debates by commentators like Dave Smith when forced to confront their past broadcast statements. Rogan argues that public health in America has been compromised because it functions strictly as a business. He highlights that the U.S. and New Zealand are the only two countries that legally permit pharmaceutical companies to advertise directly to consumers on television. This financial relationship effectively silences legacy networks from reporting on vaccine-related side effects like strokes or myocarditis, as doing so would jeopardize their primary advertising budgets.

Lowe connects this top-down manipulation to the UK's "Nudge Unit" (Behavioral Insights Team), which used highly sophisticated psychological tactics to coerce the public into accepting lockdowns. He draws a parallel between this systemic government overreach and his past experiences in professional football where his phone was hacked. Furthermore, Lowe and Rogan argue that compliance has evolved into a highly profitable global industry, spanning Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives and nonprofit organizations. Lowe remarks that this ecosystem "strips personal responsibility" under the guise of inclusivity while generating vast wealth for its practitioners. Rogan references the deep research of Mike Benz regarding international corruption and funding fraud, admitting that the sheer scale of the waste is completely flabbergasted and difficult to fully digest. Lowe notes that this flawed philosophy was aggressively exported from the U.S. to the UK, mentioning that the wife of British commentator and politician Rory Stewart was involved with an initiative funded by these avenues before it faced structural changes.

- The United States and New Zealand are identified as the only two countries allowing direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical television advertising. - Lowe notes his sister-in-law suffered from myocarditis and his best friend suffered a stroke one week after receiving the injection. - The UK's "Nudge Unit" is highlighted as a government apparatus used to psychologically manipulate the population into compliance.

---

[01:31:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=5466s) California's Decline, Executive Wiretapping, and the Homeless Industry

Rogan describes how the severity of lockdowns in the United States depended heavily on geography, noting that California was particularly devastating. The state forced the closure of all comedy clubs and caused the permanent shutdown of 70% of all restaurants in Los Angeles. Lowe muses that California's incredible weather, ocean views, and geographic proximity to the mountains are the only reasons people tolerate its political environment, joking that if it had the weather of Seattle, it would be entirely empty. Rogan laments that the state has been thoroughly permeated by "socialists" and "grifters pretending to be socialists" who conceal their greed behind a veneer of altruism. He points out the mathematical absurdity of local politicians accumulating massive, unexplained personal fortunes on modest government salaries, which Lowe bluntly categorizes as "crime."

To illustrate the current level of corruption, Rogan highlights a major breaking news story from California involving Governor Gavin Newsom. The FBI successfully infiltrated Newsom's inner circle by convincing a high-ranking female staff member and close ally to wear a hidden wire for over a year, an investigation that originated during the Biden administration in 2024. Lowe notes that similar systemic rot is evident in major cities like Chicago and San Francisco. Rogan argues that these municipal failures stem from a lucrative "homeless industry." For instance, California spent $24 billion to combat homelessness, yet the crisis only worsened because the funds were redirected to sustain a network of nonprofits where board members pull down hundreds of thousands of dollars a year, creating a perverse financial incentive never to solve the actual problem.

- California lost an estimated 70% of its restaurants in Los Angeles due to pandemic lockdown policies. - The FBI investigation into California Governor Gavin Newsom's administration involved a staff ally wearing a wire for over a year, starting in 2024. - California spent $24 billion on its homelessness crisis, which Rogan argues directly fueled a predatory "homeless industry."

[01:35:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=5708s) Immigration Strategies and Irresponsible Spending

Joe Rogan and Rupert Lowe dive into the mechanics of current immigration policies, with Rogan outlining a theory—often shared by Elon Musk—about the deliberate movement of undocumented immigrants into blue states. The ultimate objective, as Rogan describes it, appears to be a multi-step process of integrating these individuals into social assistance programs, transitioning them into citizenship, and thereby securing a massive, permanent voting base that will perpetually support the party providing those benefits. Rogan notes that Musk has a deep awareness of this problem, particularly regarding the extensive involvement of US aid, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and nonprofits. Lowe strongly agrees, viewing this dynamic as a total lack of respect for taxpayer funds, a crisis he emphasizes is mirrored closely in the United Kingdom.

- Rogan highlights a perceived strategy to shift populations to blue states to create a self-perpetuating base of guaranteed voters. - Elon Musk's perspective is cited regarding the deep involvement of US aid and various NGOs in managing the border situation.

[01:36:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=5775s) Global Conflicts and Defense Priorities

The conversation shifts to the threat of international conflict, with Rogan voicing the broad conservative sentiment that "nobody that's conservative wanted" a war, particularly with Iran. Rogan observes that in the US, supporters of Israel appear to be the only faction pushing for military escalation, while most ordinary citizens are completely horrified by the prospect, especially since Donald Trump's political platform was heavily built on the pillar of avoiding foreign interventions. Lowe analyzes the geopolitical situation through the lens of *realpolitik*, stating that going to war makes no sense unless it directly benefits the nation state. While he acknowledges that Iran acts as a "malevolent state" that spreads dangerous ideologies via proxies like Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas, he notes the UK is currently in no position to handle it. Lowe laments that Britain's defense infrastructure has deteriorated so badly that a warship sent out to assist failed to function properly, a direct consequence of spending national funds on welfare instead of military readiness.

- Lowe criticizes British defense spending, noting a specific incident where a single UK warship sent to help "didn't work properly". - The speakers agree that the general public opposes escalating tensions with Iran, favoring a focus on domestic stability.

[01:37:41](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=5861s) Free Speech, Social Compliance, and Two-Tier Policing

Lowe praises Elon Musk for his role in protecting global discourse, asserting that Musk has been "incredibly helpful in restoring free speech." Without a platform to openly debate, Lowe argues that British citizens would be entirely crushed by the "malign philosophy" of modern Fabian socialists and political organizations like the Fabian Society and the Haldane Society. Rogan points out the chilling effect of the British government's aggressive tactics, noting that a wave of high-profile arrests has effectively "incentivized people to keep their mouth shut" out of sheer fear of legal trouble. Lowe validates this by bringing up the concept of "two-tier policing" in the UK, where massive pro-Palestinian marches are openly tolerated by authorities, while any demonstration associated with controversial figures like Tommy Robinson is aggressively shut down.

- Lowe refers to the current political class as the "Fabian Society" and "Haldane Society", accusing them of harboring a malign, anti-debate philosophy. - The concept of "two-tier policing" is introduced to describe the disparate treatment of political demonstrations in the UK.

[01:38:39](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=5919s) The Grooming Gang Scandals and Institutional Failure

Lowe gives historical credit to Tommy Robinson for sounding the alarm on British grooming and rape gangs as early as 2003 in Luton, despite being immediately branded a "horrible far-right extremist" by the political establishment. Rogan recalls his own confusion during that era, remembering how the media dismissed the claims as entirely fabricated, leaving outside observers wondering what the actual truth was. Lowe clarifies that time has proven those early warnings right, explaining that the establishment covered up the crisis because it exposed the total failure of their "multicultural post-war experiment." Lowe asserts that the state failed to protect its most vulnerable young people out of political correctness, stressing that "a rape is a rape" regardless of whether the perpetrator is from a Muslim or Christian background, and must be prosecuted equally under the law.

- Tommy Robinson's early warnings about grooming gangs in Luton date back to 2003. - Lowe argues that the establishment covered up the abuse to protect the reputation of their post-war multicultural policies.

[01:39:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=5992s) Race Relations, Identity, and the Steven Lawrence Legacy

When Rogan asks what Lowe would do to fix this systemic failure if he gained power, Lowe responds directly: "Apply the law, the law of our land to the people who are perpetrating it." The core issue, Lowe explains, is that British police forces have become institutionally paralyzed by a fear of being labeled racist. He traces this institutional anxiety back to the late 1990s following the tragic, racially motivated murder of Steven Lawrence in London. Lowe contends that while the killing was horrific, the state's subsequent reaction caused a major imbalance; today, hate crimes involving white perpetrators are heavily publicized, while crimes committed against the "indigenous white people" are routinely hushed up by authorities. This phrase catches Rogan off guard, who chuckles and remarks that saying "indigenous white people" is highly unusual to an American ear, joking, "It's the reason why everyone's so pale." Lowe defends the terminology, insisting that the English do have a distinct, indigenous identity.

- The murder of Steven Lawrence occurred in London during the late 1990s and dramatically reshaped British police doctrine. - Lowe states that police are now driven by a deep institutional fear of being called racist, leading to uneven law enforcement.

[01:41:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=6072s) Creating a Hostile Environment for Non-Integration

Lowe and Rogan clarify that they are both entirely supportive of legal immigration where people integrate, contribute, and respect the host country. The breakdown occurs when immigrants refuse to adapt. Rogan emphasizes that incentivizing illegal migration is "pure insanity" because it inevitably bankrupts a nation and forces an unfair financial burden onto taxpayers. Lowe explains that his party's official immigration policy document explicitly advocates for creating a "hostile environment" for illegal or non-contributing migrants. This strategy involves cutting off access to state welfare and housing benefits to encourage people to return to their home countries—particularly those who openly disrespect British culture, reject Western laws, and view the local population as "the infidel."

- Lowe advocates for a "hostile environment" policy framework designed to withdraw welfare incentives from non-integrating migrants. - Both speakers express support for legal immigrants who actively integrate and contribute to the local economy.

[01:42:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=6132s) Repealing Blair-Era Legislation and Restoring Sovereignty

To legally deport individuals and reverse these trends, Lowe states that his political movement must win an overall parliamentary majority by 2029. This majority would grant them the power to repeal the extensive welfare, healthcare, and housing legislation originally passed by former Prime Minister Tony Blair and his acolytes, which Lowe believes was intentionally designed to facilitate unstoppable mass migration. Lowe notes with some amusement that Blair has recently tried to publicly distance himself from the very issues he created, calling him a "canny old fox" who "looks a bit like Beelzebub these days" with his piercing eyes and white hair. Lowe explains that reclaiming the country requires a top-down approach through Parliament, combined with a bottom-up takeover of corrupt local governments that enabled the grooming gang cover-ups. He proudly points out that his party has already begun this grassroots shift, winning nine out of nine county council seats in Norfolk.

- Lowe sets a political target to achieve an overall majority in the British Parliament by the 2029 election. - Tony Blair's legislative reforms are blamed for creating the legal framework that protects mass migration and empowers unelected bodies. - Lowe’s party successfully secured nine out of nine county council seats in the coastal county of Norfolk.

[01:45:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=6337s) The Rise of Quangos and the Anglo-Saxon Bond

Lowe details the massive institutional resistance they face from what he describes as organized crime, a corrupt judiciary, a compromised police force, and a subverted NHS monopoly. He reminds Rogan that the British electorate already expressed their desire for sovereignty during the 2016 Brexit vote, choosing to leave the European Union despite a direct letter sent to every UK household by then-Prime Minister David Cameron urging them to remain. Lowe explains that British parliamentary omnipotence has been severely eroded by "quangos"—quasi-autonomous non-governmental organizations like the Bar Standards Board and the Supreme Court—which were multiplied under Blair and employ thousands of unelected bureaucrats. Closing the loop on historical ties, Lowe jokingly remarks that Britain made a mistake letting America declare its independence, noting that if they had played their cards better, the US might still be part of the family. Lowe concludes with a serious call for solidarity, stating that the "cohesive Anglo-Saxon world" must support one another against globalist fragmentation from entities like the World Economic Forum to preserve individual freedom. Rogan pivots slightly, noting that while England has an indigenous white identity, the magic of the American melting pot is that anyone from any background can become an American, provided they follow the rules and resist the corruption of massive corporations.

- **Quango Defined:** Lowe defines a "quango" as a quasi-national government organization that operates outside of direct democratic accountability. - **Brexit Retrospective:** Mention of the 2016 referendum where citizens ignored David Cameron’s official government leaflets to vote for leaving the EU. - **Corporate Influence:** Rogan emphasizes that the true threat to the American dream is the corruption of the political system by massive corporate entities.

[01:49:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=6591s) Rooting Out Institutional Corruption

Joe Rogan points out the absurdity of career politicians making relatively modest annual salaries of around $170,000, yet somehow accumulating net worths of $400 million without anyone questioning it or facing jail time. He compares political corruption to a bacterial infection; if a country doesn't take the full course of antibiotics to wipe it out completely, it just breeds medication-resistant bacteria. Similarly, halting the fight against corruption mid-way only teaches bad actors how to lock things down further with stricter laws and tighter regulations next time. Rupert Lowe wholeheartedly agrees, stating that the UK is essentially "in the hands of organized crime" because its legacy institutions have completely rotted from within.

Lowe emphasizes that betraying the trust of the electorate is a massive crime, pointing to officials who constantly flourish financially despite high tax rates and fixed state salaries. He highlights the British judiciary as a prime example of institutional rot, describing it as a "quango"—an quasi-autonomous non-governmental organization—where judges are no longer appointed by Parliament, but rather by a "woke" committee. Lowe recalls an incident in Parliament where he tried to take a body called the ICGS (Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme) to court after catching them doing something wrong. The ICGS successfully claimed parliamentary privilege to shield themselves from legal action, even though the committee includes no actual MPs and does not report to any parliamentary committee. Lowe argues that allowing non-elected bodies to usurp parliamentary privilege is exactly how the elected assembly has been systemically undermined.

- Joe Rogan highlights the lack of legal consequences for politicians who earn $170,000 a year but amass $400 million fortunes. - Rupert Lowe describes the modern British judiciary as a "quango" whose appointments are dictated by an ideological, non-parliamentary committee. - Lowe details his legal battle with the ICGS (Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme), noting how they manipulated parliamentary privilege to evade accountability in court.

[01:53:10](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=6790s) The Threat to Jury Trials and the Phone-Hacking Scandal

The conversation shifts to recent legal developments in Britain, with Rogan raising alarms about attempts to eliminate jury trials for a significant portion of the population. Lowe confirms that while the change is not yet established law due to pushback from a few decent Labour MPs, the push to force more people through a judge-only system is a dangerous manifestation of establishment control. To illustrate his own battles with institutional overreach, Lowe shares an anecdote from his past career in football management, when he fought a libel trial against *The Times*, a newspaper owned by Rupert Murdoch.

Lowe reveals that during his time in football, national newspapers were hacking his phone daily by exploiting unencrypted voicemail security codes. If a user left their voicemail pin as the factory default, such as "0000", reporters could easily access the messages, log incoming phone numbers, and begin targeting anyone else who had left a message. While Lowe acknowledges that Murdoch has done plenty to advance right-wing causes over the years, he strongly condemns the phone-hacking practices as part of a wider, corrupted establishment that ultimately breeds public oppression.

- British lawmakers have attempted to remove jury trials for certain offenses, though some Labour MPs have successfully resisted it so far. - Lowe shares that *The Times* frequently hacked his voicemail during his career in football administration. - Hackers targeted default voicemail PIN numbers like "0000" to harvest contact numbers and expand their surveillance network.

[01:55:11](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=6911s) The Hollowing Out of the British Economy

Rogan asks about the current national mood in England, noting that Americans are often insulated from how the British public actually feels. Lowe explains that the country is split between a class of people profiting off flawed institutional systems and an increasingly squeezed private sector. He points out a stark structural difference between the US and the UK economies: the British state now accounts for over 50% of the nation's GDP when accounting for the vast network of quangos. This stands in sharp contrast to the pre-Tony Blair and Margaret Thatcher eras, when the state accounted for a much healthier 30% to 33% of the economy.

Lowe attributes this shift to a deliberate "Fabian philosophy" that aims to build a USSR-style dependency culture reliant on centrally planned taxpayer funds. By taxing the private sector into oblivion, the government has driven away the nation's "rainmakers"—its most capable brains, entrepreneurs, and wealthy non-domiciled residents ("non-doms")—who have fled to low-tax jurisdictions like Italy, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and the United States. When Rogan asks if young people are waking up to this reality, Lowe expresses immense optimism, noting that the youth are incredibly supportive of his movement because they see the need to rebalance the economy. He notes that navigating the fast-moving AI revolution will make things even trickier, as it risks creating hyper-wealthy tech elites while leaving those without high tech literacy to struggle.

- The state's direct and indirect share of the UK economy has climbed from a historical 30%-33% to over 50% of GDP. - High tax rates have caused a massive brain drain of British talent and wealthy "non-doms" relocating to Italy, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and the US. - Lowe warns that the "Fabian agenda" seeks a centrally planned economy that suppresses free speech, open debate, and independent thought.

[01:59:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=7180s) Political Shakeups and the Looming Election

Rogan voices American concern over recent events in the UK, calling the arrests over social media posts deeply disturbing and describing the findings of the British grooming gang inquiry reports as "impossible to believe." When Rogan asks when the next election will take place, Lowe explains the highly unusual political landscape following Keir Starmer stepping down. He notes that Andy Burnham—whom Lowe jokingly nicknames "the Ghostbuster"—is being set up as a more user-friendly replacement. Burnham, the former Mayor of Manchester, won a recent by-election and is poised to be anointed Prime Minister by July 20th, despite not even being a sitting MP until very recently. Rogan finds it "crazy" and "bonkers" that a political party can simply swap out the nation's leader without a general election.

Lowe explains that because Labour holds the largest postwar majority, Burnham has the legal backstop to stretch the government out until 2029, making a snap election highly unlikely. Lowe also points out the deep irony of Burnham's ascent, revealing that Burnham is explicitly mentioned in the grooming gang reports for failing to do enough to stop the abuse networks while serving as the Mayor of Manchester. Sitting on the powerful Public Accounts Committee, Lowe witnesses the "off the scale" waste of the state firsthand as they audit civil servants. He laments that the government is actively breaking the backbone of Britain by introducing unprecedented taxes on family farms and businesses, driving a state-reliant society. Closing the interview, Rogan thanks Lowe for making the trip during a busy week of celebrations, and Lowe notes that even on his flight over, everyday citizens were thanking him and pledging their votes.

- Keir Starmer has stepped down, with former Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham expected to be anointed Prime Minister by July 20, 2026. - Labour's massive postwar majority allows the party to avoid calling a general election until the legal deadline in 2029. - Lowe notes that Andy Burnham is directly cited in the regional grooming gang inquiry reports for oversight failures in Manchester. - The UK government has recently instituted new taxes targeting traditional family farms and private family businesses.

## Notable quotes > [19:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=1196s) There is a cultural difference of opinion between an open high trust Christian view of women particularly and the Islamic view of women... they are considered to be meat. — Rupert Lowe

> [53:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=3220s) inform, educate and entertain — Rupert Lowe

> [53:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=3220s) responsibly defund the BBC — Rupert Lowe

> [53:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=3220s) dripping poison into the veins of Britain every day — Rupert Lowe

> [58:55](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=3535s) Like they're not even trying to hide it — Joe Rogan

> [58:55](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=3535s) just for a goof — Joe Rogan

> [01:15:31](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=4531s) Show me a young man who's not a liberal and I'll show you a man without a heart. Show me an old man who's not conservative and I'll show you a man without a brain. — Joe Rogan

> [01:39:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=5992s) Apply the law, the law of our land to the people who are perpetrating it. — Rupert Lowe

> [01:39:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=5992s) indigenous white people — Rupert Lowe

> [01:39:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=5992s) It's the reason why everyone's so pale. — Joe Rogan

> [01:41:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=6072s) hostile environment — Rupert Lowe

> [01:42:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=6132s) canny old fox — Rupert Lowe

> [01:42:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=6132s) looks a bit like Beelzebub these days — Rupert Lowe

> [01:59:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=7180s) the Ghostbuster — Rupert Lowe

## Mentioned Joe Rogan, Rupert Lowe, Bret Weinstein, Jordan Peterson, Elon Musk, Jean Monnet, Altiero Spinelli, Sir James Goldsmith, Tony Blair, Lee Kuan Yew, Boris Johnson, Sammy Woodhouse, Graeme Smith, Enoch Powell, Donald Trump, Zia Yusuf, Lucy Connolly, Axel Rudakubana, Henry Novak, Klaus Schwab, George Orwell, Margaret Thatcher, Restore Britain, Reform UK, Brexit Party, Labour Party, Green Party, World Economic Forum, BetterHelp, onX Offroad, Perplexity, Bibby Stockholm, Human Rights Act, Equalities Act, European Convention on Human Rights, Supreme Court, Great Yarmouth, Southampton F.C., Arsenal, Public Accounts Committee, Joe Biden, USAID, Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations, BBC, Sky News, The Daily Telegraph, GB News, Patrick Christys, John Reith, Breitbart, The New York Times, CNN, X, Fabian Society, Keir Starmer, George Bernard Shaw, Jamie, India, Starlink, Winston Churchill, Anders Tegnell, Los Angeles, National Health Service, Dave Chappelle, Neil Young, Spotify, Uttar Pradesh, Chris Cuomo, Dave Smith, Nudge Unit, Behavioral Insights Team, Mike Benz, Rory Stewart, California, Seattle, Chicago, San Francisco, Gavin Newsom, FBI, Iran, Israel, Hezbollah, Hamas, Lebanon, Haldane Society, Tommy Robinson, Steven Lawrence, David Cameron, Bar Standards Board, ICGS, Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme, The Times, Rupert Murdoch, Andy Burnham

[Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY)

中文简报

英国政客Rupert Lowe呼吁大规模废除福利以遏制移民这位Restore Britain领导人声称，Tony Blair的宪制改革与政治瘫痪的司法体系蓄意削弱国家主权，以滋生集体主义的依赖文化。在本期节目中，Rupert Lowe与Joe Rogan探讨了他们眼中二战后英国走向终结的衰落，并将其归因于大规模移民、全球主义议程以及根植于集体主义意识形态的机构过度扩权。Lowe重点剖析了非法移民带来的社会冲击、平行法律体系，以及机构因害怕被贴上种族主义标签而对内城区诱拐团伙（grooming gangs）数据的压制。此外，双方还探讨了Blair时代政策的负面遗产、过度依赖国家福利导致的英国经济空心化，并共同批判了现代媒体、企业俘获与大学的思想灌输。英国议员鲁珀特·洛（Rupert Lowe）指出，战后精英为推动融入欧洲超级国家而削弱民族主权，随后托尼·布莱尔政府大幅加速移民并推行一系列法律，使英国社会走向集体主义。 (3:00) 英国已从二战后的高信任社会退化，目前每年仅因社交媒体上的言论发表就有约1.2万人遭到逮捕。 (6:51) 英国政府被指容忍未获官方承认的伊斯兰教法法庭平行运作，洛与罗根警告这种平行治理体系可能重蹈黎巴嫩历史上人口结构变化导致社会失衡的覆辙。 (13:12) 一项由民间众筹发起的独立调查报告保守估计，全英147个热点地区发生了至少25万起针对年轻女性的诱拐强奸案，但公共机构因害怕被指责为种族主义及政治选票考量而长期隐瞒犯罪者的族裔数据。 (44:22)

Reading summary

British MP Rupert Lowe contends that decades of post-war integration, Tony Blair's constitutional reforms, and expansive welfare policies have eroded United Kingdom sovereignty, suppressed free speech, and facilitated systemic child exploitation scandals. He argues that restoring national stability requires dismantling unelected regulatory bodies, strictly conditioning immigration on cultural integration, and securing a parliamentary majority by 2029. The Grooming Gang Inquiry and Institutional Cover-ups (16:52) Lowe highlights findings from an independent inquiry crowdfunded by over 20,000 British citizens who raised roughly £600,000 after the government refused to establish a statutory investigation. Presided over by barrister Graeme Smith and activist Sammy Woodhouse, the report documents an estimated minimum of 250,000 rapes across 147 UK locations. Lowe asserts that these offenses were executed by organized syndicates predominantly involving men of Pakistani and other foreign backgrounds who specifically targeted white, working-class girls. According to Lowe, political parties, police forces, and legacy media outlets suppressed investigations and ethnicity data due to institutional fear of appearing racist—a sensitivity he traces back to the fallout of the Steven Lawrence murder in the late 1990s. He also alleges that the Labour Party protected these grooming networks to safeguard influential postal-voting blocs in major urban constituencies, while early whistleblowers like Tommy Robinson were marginalized as extremists. Channel Migration, Welfare Pull Factors, and Assimilation (36:33) Addressing border security, Lowe estimates that between 1.8 and 2 million people currently reside in the UK illegally. He notes that cross-Channel small boat arrivals persist despite the British government paying France more than £500 million annually to stem the crossings. Instead of acting as a deterrent, Lowe argues that state policy creates massive economic pull factors by granting incoming migrants hotel housing, laundry, and taxi allowances, alongside mismanaged projects like the redundant £1.5 billion Bibby Stockholm housing barge. Lowe and Rogan warn that accepting large populations without enforcing cultural assimilation has created segregated parallel societies. Lowe expresses particular concern over the state's tolerance of unrecognized Sharia courts operating within English cities, arguing that clannish customs regarding the treatment of women fundamentally clash with Britain’s traditional high-trust, Christian legal framework. Speech Restrictions, Gun Laws, and Two-Tier Policing (28:18) The discussion criticizes the contraction of civil liberties in the UK, centering on an estimated 12,000 citizens arrested annually for online social media posts. Lowe characterizes modern British law enforcement as practicing 'two-tier policing,' alleging that authorities aggressively police indigenous white commentators and working-class demonstrators while displaying leniency toward large pro-Palestinian marches. To demonstrate state overreach, Lowe cites his own experience of having legitimate sporting firearms seized by armed police for five to six months following unsubstantiated claims by political rivals. He also warns against proposed legislative efforts to restrict jury trials in favor of judge-only verdicts. Rogan and Lowe argue that disarmament, censorship, and institutional DEI initiatives have combined to disempower individual citizens and punish dissent. Constitutional Devolution, Expanding Quangos, and Economic Decline (102:12) Lowe traces the UK's long-term economic stagnation to Fabian socialist ideology and the late-1990s legislative overhaul enacted by former Prime Minister Tony Blair. These reforms established the Human Rights Act, created the Supreme Court, and expanded unelected regulatory bodies ('quangos') that Lowe argues have usurped the constitutional supremacy of the Westminster Parliament. Financially, Lowe reports that the state apparatus now commands over 50% of the UK economy, compared to approximately 30% to 33% during previous decades. He contends that excessive taxation and national debt approaching 100% of GDP have triggered capital flight among entrepreneurs and non-domiciled residents, while young workers face high inflation, £60,000 non-dischargeable student debts, and locked pension capital held by baby boomers. To reverse these trends, Lowe states that Restore Britain aims to build upon local election victories—such as winning nine council seats in Norfolk—to achieve an outright parliamentary majority by 2029 and repeal Blair-era legislation. Lowe identifies entrenched opposition from civil service bureaucracies, legal quangos, and media organizations like the BBC as primary hurdles to reform, while Labour's large parliamentary majority could delay a general election until 2029. While he expresses confidence in growing youth resistance to economic stagnation, the viability of his proposed mass deportations, welfare reductions, and constitutional repeals remains unproven.

精炼阅读摘要

英国独立议员兼“恢复英国”（Restore Britain）领袖鲁珀特·洛（Rupert Lowe）在访谈中主张，战后欧洲一体化构想与托尼·布莱尔时期的制度改革系统性削弱了英国主权，导致不受控移民、平行社会以及长达数十年的诱拐性侵丑闻被官方掩盖。他呼吁必须在2029年前通过议会全面废除布莱尔时代的立法架构，以恢复法治平等、个人自由与经济活力。性侵团伙丑闻与制度性掩盖指控 (16:52) 洛指出，由受害者萨米·伍德豪斯（Sammy Woodhouse）参与、大律师格雷姆·史密斯（Graeme Smith）主持的独立调查，依靠逾2万名公民众筹的约60万英镑才得以成行，主因是政府始终拒绝启动法定调查。根据该调查报告估算，全英至少有25万起强奸案与高度组织化的诱拐网络相关，波及147个热点地区。调查发现涉案团伙与毒品及卖淫网络交织，针对目标多为白人工人阶层女童，加害者主要为来自巴基斯坦米尔普尔等地的穆斯林男性，以及来自孟加拉国、索马里和厄立特里亚的群体。洛声称，主流媒体与工党政府对此长期保持沉默，其政治根源在于维系内城区依赖邮寄选票的穆斯林选民基础。此外，自1990年代末斯蒂芬·劳伦斯（Stephen Lawrence）谋杀案发生后，英国警方与司法机构因极度畏惧被贴上“种族主义”标签而陷入制度性瘫痪，不仅压制法庭记录并放弃统计罪犯族裔数据，甚至对境内非正式运转的伊斯兰教法法庭采取默许态度，造成法律平等的基石被严重蚕食。非法移民潮、纳税人负担与平行秩序 (10:50) 针对英吉利海峡的偷渡危机，洛提供其团队的估算称，当前滞留在英国的非法移民约在180万至200万人之间。尽管英国政府每年向法国支付逾5亿英镑以遏制偷渡，但边境巡逻队在风平浪静之日仍需应对单日多达千人的涌入；原本用于安置寻求庇护者的“比比·斯德哥尔摩”（Bibby Stockholm）驳船耗费了纳税人15亿英镑，如今却完全闲置废弃。与此同时，政府与承包商签订合同，为非法入境者在酒店提供洗衣、专车和特殊饮食等优厚保障，其具体滞留人数官方甚至缺乏精准统计。洛与罗根认为，西方现行的福利体系与“觉醒文化”构成了巨大的经济拉力，导致许多人将英国视为无需融入即可享有福利的目的地。当大量来自宗族部落文化背景的群体进入传统的“高信任社会”，便产生了不可调和的文化冲突。洛主张通过其政党的“大规模驱逐”政策文件，切断非法滞留者和不愿融入群体的国家福利与住房支持，创造严苛的“敌意环境”以促使其自愿离境或被遣送回国。布莱尔遗产、费边主义与经济主权侵蚀 (115:11) 洛追溯英国当前的制度危机至战后欧洲精英削弱民族国家主权的长期设想，并指责托尼·布莱尔政府在1997年后通过《人权法案》、引入《欧洲人权公约》、设立最高法院及通过《平等法案》，严重动摇了英国历史悠久的宪制传统。他指出，工党前座议员广泛受到创立于1880年代的费边社（Fabian Society）理念影响，其政策倾向于苏联式的中央计划与福利依赖，从而不断削弱个人的自由度与责任感。在经济层面，洛指出英国国家开支（包含庞大的非政府半官方行政机构Quango）目前已占国内生产总值（GDP）的50%以上，相较于撒切尔夫人时期的30%至33%大幅膨胀，而国家债务已逼近GDP的100%。沉重的税负与高风险厌恶的养老金财富锁定，迫使企业家和高净值人才流向低税区，年轻一代则面临买房无望与高达6万英镑不可破产学生贷款的沉重压迫。洛认为，唯有削减官僚机构规模、重新激活个人主义与创业精神，才能阻断英国在经济上的恶性衰退。双重执法标准、言论压制与公民权利萎缩 (28:18) 罗根与洛重点探讨了英国本土自由权利的萎缩现象。数据显示，英国每年约有1.2万人仅因社交媒体言论遭到警方逮捕；而在实际执法中，洛指责当局推行“双重执法”（Two-tier policing）：大规模亲巴勒斯坦游行得到默许，而本土人士或右翼抗议活动则遭遇严厉封杀。洛举例指出，绍斯波特袭击案凶手在被纳入反恐预防计划后仍能行凶，普通民众却因言论身陷囹圄；甚至洛本人也曾在2025年初因政治对手未经验证的诬告，遭到四名武装警察深夜搜家并扣押合法枪支长达数月。对话将这种国家威权过度扩张追溯至1990年代邓布兰枪击案后对合法手枪的全面封杀，并延伸至新冠疫情时期的强制封锁与心理引导（如“助推小组”）。洛与罗根批评，公共卫生专家和受药企资助的主流媒体联手压制了关于伊维菌素（Ivermectin）等廉价替代疗法的客观讨论，不仅摧毁了公众对专业机构的信任，还借助合规产业化与削弱陪审团审判的企图，进一步巩固了建制派对社会舆论的垄断控制。洛计划在2029年大选前带领“恢复英国”夺得议会多数席位，从而自上而下废除布莱尔时期的法律框架，并结合地方选举的渐进胜利（如在诺福克郡议会赢得九席）清除基层腐败。然而，随着基尔·斯塔默辞职、安迪·伯纳姆（Andy Burnham）预计在未经历全国大选的情况下接任首相，工党现有的绝对议会多数使其能够合法执政至2029年。在庞大的官僚机构阻力和深层社会文化裂痕之下，这种激进的体制重构设想能否在不引发更剧烈动荡的前提下实现，仍存巨大不确定性。

Detailed notes — zh

## Background 该视频由 YouTube 频道 PowerfulJRE 于 2026 年 7 月 8 日发布。视频内容为 Joe Rogan 对英国大雅茅斯国会议员兼 Restore Britain 领袖 Rupert Lowe 的深度专访。 ## TL;DR 访谈聚焦于英国当下严峻的社会与宪政危机，Rupert Lowe 详细披露了其团队民间众筹调查所揭露的全国性诱拐强奸犯罪团伙内幕，批评官方与主流媒体长期刻意掩盖真相。两人深入探讨了二战后多元文化工程、托尼·布莱尔时期的宪制改革与半官方机构（Quangos）如何削弱国家主权、推行双重标准执法并侵蚀言论自由。此外，对话还批判了疫情期间严苛的微观管控、高税收对私营经济与家庭农场的扼杀，以及费边主义福利体制带来的全面社会衰退，呼吁通过自下而上的政治改革夺回议会主权与个人自由。 ## Atmosphere & style 整场对话气氛严肃沉重且极具危机感，充斥着对西方文明现状的深切焦虑与对官僚体制的愤怒质询。Rupert Lowe 以坦率犀利、毫无保留的政治局外人姿态直言不讳，而 Joe Rogan 则在震惊与同理之间穿插尖锐追问，两人在诸多文化与制度批判上产生强烈共鸣。随着对儿童侵害丑闻、言论钳制与经济衰退细节的层层剖析，谈话在压抑与警示中逐渐转向坚定，展现出一种破釜沉舟、誓要打破建制禁锢的决绝斗志。 ## Bulletin - [45:26](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=2726s) 鲁珀特·洛团队通过2万人众筹约60万英镑完成英国诱拐强奸犯罪团伙调查报告，保守测算全英受害女童超25万人，涉及至少147个城镇，迫使官方表态启动法定调查。 - [33:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=2026s) 洛指出英国非法居留人口估计达180万至200万，现行法律与条约严重掣肘驱逐程序，且公共财政在安置驳船和高档接待服务上耗费巨资，加剧财政透支与平行社会危机。 - [23:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=1410s) 两位嘉宾直指英国每年有逾12,000人因社交媒体发帖被捕，司法与执法呈现“双轨制”，公职体系因恐惧被指控种族主义而长期隐匿特定族群犯罪数据。 - [01:55:39](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=6939s) 洛警告英国国家公共支出及Quango准官方机构规模已占GDP超50%，二战以来最沉重的税负重创家庭农场与私营经济，必须在2029年大选前废除布莱尔遗留法规以夺回国家主权。 ## Key takeaways - [01:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=65s) 二战后欧洲一体化与英国精英策略刻意削弱单一民族国家概念，托尼·布莱尔时期的宪制改革与多元文化工程为当前的文明冲突埋下根基。 - [05:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=357s) 封闭、宗族至上的移民群体涌入英国本土极高信任社会，产生根本性文化断层，并催生出被官方默许推行伊斯兰教法的平行司法体系。 - [16:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=992s) 黎巴嫩在人口结构越过临界点后由富足开放迅速滑向内战并被真主党掌控，成为西方无序接纳不认同世俗法治群体的前车之鉴。 - [20:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=1234s) 民间众筹完成的诱拐性侵报告揭露系统性犯罪网络，施暴团伙多数具有巴基斯坦等特定族裔背景，并深度捆绑跨国贩毒与强迫卖淫。 - [23:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=1410s) 英国官僚机构与公共卫生、警察部门在DEI教条下畏惧被扣上“种族主义”标签，系统性隐瞒犯罪数据并压制言论自由，每年上万人因言论被捕。 - [25:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=1558s) 英国枪支管制剥夺了守法公民合法自卫权利，而洛本人甚至因党内恶意政治诬告遭到武装警察深夜破门搜查并没收合法持有的猎枪。 - [27:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=1678s) 南港恶性刺杀幼女案引发舆论动荡，当局一方面对民众网络情绪发言判处重刑，另一方面却未能提前阻止早已录入反恐监控名单的凶手，显露严重司法双标。 - [29:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=1780s) 达沃斯世界经济论坛（WEF）倡导的去所有权与全球主义议程，实质上正在以扭曲的利他主义名义剥夺民族国家公民的基本权益与财富。 - [37:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=2266s) 非法移民在英国享有免费豪华酒店安置、现金补助甚至NHS牙科看诊优先权，而本地纳税人却面临医疗资源匮乏，形成极度荒谬的逆向激励。 - [40:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=2419s) 西方进步主义左派在面对针对女性的宗族荣誉谋杀、乱石砸死等极端习俗时集体失声，暴露出与现实严重脱节的虚伪道德标准。 - [53:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=3220s) BBC等老牌垄断媒体对全国性强奸犯罪丑闻保持沉默，洛主张应彻底取消电视执照费并对BBC断绝公共拨款。 - [01:04:26](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=3866s) 现代高校文科教育充斥着单一同质化的反西方意识形态，压制保守派思想与事实辩论，并制造了背负高昂债务却缺乏市场实用技能的年轻毕业生群体。 - [01:18:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=4728s) 疫情期间严苛的行政封控阻断了年轻一代的正常社交与成长，而政府设立行为诱导团队（Nudge Unit）动用心理战术迫使全民盲从，严重损耗了公共权威的公信力。 - [01:28:39](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=5319s) 制药巨头的庞大商业广告预算事实上绑架了电视新闻媒体的监督权，廉价替代治疗方案因危及疫苗“紧急使用授权”（EUA）的法律基石而遭到系统性抹黑。 - [01:33:16](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=5596s) 非政府组织（NGO）与援助机构演变成吸血产业，在加州无家可归问题上耗费240亿美元却任由危机持续加剧，成为既得利益者的敛财工具。 - [01:45:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=6337s) 托尼·布莱尔时期设立的大量非民选Quango机构和独立司法架构架空了民选议会的最高主权，使国家决策脱离选民的民主监督与问责。 - [01:52:38](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=6758s) 英国正试图进一步压缩陪审团审判制度的适用范围，将更多司法裁量权交由官僚法官掌控，进一步加剧了司法专断与建制派压迫风险。 - [01:41:33](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=6093s) 洛强调摆脱英国晚期衰退的合法出路是在2029年大选中赢得绝对多数，自下而上重构地方治理，全面废除布莱尔时期的恶法并恢复真正自由市场与主权秩序。 ## Detailed walkthrough ### [00:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=1s) 连线幕后与英国的严峻现状对谈伊始，Joe Rogan 向大雅茅斯（Great Yarmouth）国会议员、Restore Britain 领袖 Rupert Lowe 表示欢迎，并特别感谢 Bret Weinstein、Jordan Peterson 以及 Elon Musk 为促成两人此次会面牵线搭桥。Rupert Lowe 透露，自己周日即将前往拜访 Elon Musk，盛赞 Musk 给予了巨大的支持，并坦言自己完全服从 Rogan 的访谈节奏，因为眼下“英国的处境极其糟糕（Britain's in bad shape）”。谈话随即切入焦点议题——Rupert 团队通过民间众筹发起撰写的一份关于“强奸团伙”（rape gangs）的深度调查报告。Joe Rogan 难掩震惊与困惑：在 2026 年的今天，英国居然还存在着成规模的强奸团伙？这种恶性罪行究竟是被主流媒体和政客刻意忽视、淡化，还是遭遇了制度性的掩盖？ ```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: 英国主权削弱与危机形成路径 accDescr: 展示二战后欧洲一体化构想如何逐步削弱英国主权并引发文化碰撞 subgraph EliteStrategy["战后精英设计"] A["二战后欧洲一体化"] --> B["削弱单一民族国家概念"] B --> C["推行多元文化与边界开放"] end subgraph InstitutionalShift["布莱尔时期的制度转变"] C --> D["1997年布莱尔掌权与宪政改革"] D --> E["出台《人权法》《平等法案》等"] end subgraph SocialConsequence["社会后果与当前危机"] E --> F["宗族社会与高信任社会冲突"] F --> G["强奸团伙问题长期蔓延与制度失灵"] end ``` --- ### [01:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=65s) 战后欧洲蓝图：民族国家的削弱与多元文化工程面对 Rogan 的追问，Rupert Lowe 从二战后的历史沿革剖析其根源。二战结束后，欧洲大部分地区陷入大规模动荡与流离失所，但英国在美军协助下赢得战争，本土从未被占领，国民保持着极高的自豪感与主权意识。然而，Jean Monnet、Altiero Spinelli 等欧洲一体化构建者，以及英国本土的精英阶层，普遍将拿破仑战争、一战德皇和二战希特勒的灾难归咎于“民族国家”（nation state）的膨胀。为了融入欧洲乃至打造一个中央集权的“欧洲超级大国”（European superstate），英国精英阶层认定必须削弱本国的主权与国家认同。Rupert 指出，这是一场精心策划且充满欺骗性的长期规划。欧洲大陆推行开放边界和多元文化主义，将人口多元流动视为消解狭隘民族主义的解药，而近年全面爆发的强奸团伙丑闻，其历史种子正是当年这场“多元文化大举进驻欧洲”的社会工程。 - **战后欧洲精英的激进反省**：将近现代战争的惨痛悲剧全部归罪于单一民族国家的主权意识。 - **消解本土认同**：为了融入欧洲联盟的前身及后续超级架构，必须自上而下弱化英国独立自治的独特地位。 - **多元文化作为政治工具**：通过无节制的边界开放稀释民族凝聚力，为跨国官僚体系的集权铺平道路。 --- ### [03:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=184s) 货币主权保卫战与两种文明底色 Rogan 质疑，究竟是什么人会坐在一起商讨并决定出卖本国爱国主义和英格兰人的独特性。Rupert 回顾了关键历史节点：1975 年英国加入欧洲经济共同体（EEC），起初打着纯粹“经济自由贸易联盟”的旗号；但随着政治一体化遭遇阻力，欧洲精英转而在 1997 年企图通过推行单一货币“欧元”强行捆绑各国。Rupert Lowe 当年正是为了“保卫英镑”（Save the Pound）而首次投身政坛竞选议员。他强调，一旦放弃本国货币，国家主权与黄金储备就会移交法兰克福的欧洲央行，英国将彻底沦为附庸国。在爵士 James Goldsmith 等人的努力下，他们迫使建制派承诺在加入欧元区前举行全民公投，保住了英镑，这为 2016 年英国脱欧公投（Brexit）奠定了基石。当 Rogan 探讨英美两国的建制精英是否存在合谋时，Rupert 指出，尽管拜登政府时期 USAID 与世界经济论坛（WEF）的勾连令人警惕，但美国的制度基因与欧洲有着本质不同： - **美国的个体主义传统**：建国先父制定的宪法将权力还给个人，深刻警惕利维坦式的国家主义（statism）。 - **欧洲大陆的集体主义基因**：历来崇尚国家至上、自上而下的中央集权管理模式。 --- ### [05:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=357s) 宗族文化碰撞高信任社会：强奸团伙的滋生回顾英国移民结构的变化，Rupert 解释道，早期的“疾风代”（Windrush generation）非洲移民最初是为了填补本地人不愿从事的劳动力空缺，当时规模尚小；但随着欧洲内部“人员自由流动”机制的确立，跨国境迁徙门槛彻底打破。自 1997 年 Tony Blair（托尼·布莱尔）工党政府上台后，移民进程急剧失控，大量非欧洲移民——尤其是南亚背景的群体——涌入英国。 Rupert 直言，强奸团伙在英国暗中潜伏了三四十年甚至半个世纪，其本质是文化上的“水火不相容（cultural oil and water mix）”。战后英国曾是一个经历了上千年演进的极高信任社会（high-trust society），李光耀当年建设新加坡正是以战后英国为模本： - **高度社会自治与道德自律**：伦敦街头甚至设有无人看管、自行投币买报的诚信报箱（honesty boxes）。 - **宗族文化与现代法治的断层**：来自南亚封闭、宗族至上（clannish）社会的群体突然进入极高信任的英国社会，文明规则与道德约束发生剧烈断裂。 - **布莱尔主义的制度重构**：工党政府引入将《欧洲人权公约》（ECHR）内国法化的《人权法》（Human Rights Act）、创设英国最高法院、通过《平等法案》（Equalities Act），从法律架构上向多元文化倾斜，反而在制度层面上绑架并损害了本土英国民众的切身利益。 --- ### [08:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=528s) 走向全面管控的官僚利维坦 Rogan 犀利提问：精英们执意融入欧洲超级大国，难道仅仅是为了金钱，还是一种纯粹的权力控制策略？是否因为通过恶化平民生活质量、制定更多严苛律法和限制措施，能更容易控制社会并扼杀反抗？ Rupert 完全认同这一判断。他指出，这正是一场“个体主义（individualism）与集体主义（collectivism）的古老决战”。1689 年英国《权利法案》确立了言论自由与个人基本权利，后来被美国建国先父汲取并写进美国宪法；然而现代欧盟及其官僚架构却走向了奖赏集体主义、惩罚个体的社会主义保护主义超级大国。当 Rogan 震惊地指出“英国如今每年竟然因社交媒体言论逮捕多达 12,000 人”时，Rupert 沉痛地表示这正是自己从当年反对《马斯特里赫特条约》、投身 Business for Sterling、代表脱欧党当选欧洲议会议员（MEP），直到如今 68 岁高龄作为下议院议员创建 Restore Britain 党的全部动因——为了全力阻击官僚极权国家向公民自由的无休止推进。 ### [10:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=634s) 英国非法移民危机与纳税人负担鲁珀特·洛（Rupert Lowe）强调，当前的当务之急是扭转国家衰退的浪潮，重新赋予个人权利，回归英国原始的宪政体制，并将英国人民的利益置于一切之上。当乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）询问英国是否仍在持续面临不受控制的移民潮时，洛明确指出，搭乘小船偷渡的非法移民依然源源不断。然而在现行法律框架和国际条约的束缚下，政府根本无法将他们遣返。洛批评最高法院的设立使司法体系退化为一个“觉醒派半官方机构”（woke quango），并直言大量司法体系已经腐败失效。除了持续涌入的偷渡者，英国境内还滞留着巨量非法居留者，监狱中也关押着大量外籍罪犯。洛特别提到，历史上最大规模的移民浪潮之一正是在前保守党首相鲍里斯·约翰逊（Boris Johnson）执政期间发生的。尽管打着保守派的旗号，约翰逊政府却允许数十万人涌入英国，使他们最终成为英国纳税人沉重的经济负担。当罗根询问这些移民中是否有很大比例在领取政府福利时，洛给出了肯定的回答，指出大多数抵英人员自踏上国土那一刻起便完全由国家财政供养。 - **小船偷渡失控**：现行法律和国际条约严重掣肘驱逐程序，导致非法入境者无法被有效遣送出境。 - **司法与体制受阻**：最高法院等机构被指沦为意识形态化的半官方机构，司法系统缺乏有效问责。 - **保守党政府的政策后果**：在鲍里斯·约翰逊执政期间，数十万合法及非法移民涌入，造成长期福利依赖与财政透支。 --- ### [12:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=732s) 豪华安置合同与《大规模驱逐文件》规划洛利用自己在议会提出质询的特权，调阅并审查了大量政府安置非法移民的采购合同。他举例提到耗费英国纳税人15亿英镑的“比比·斯德哥尔摩”号（Bibby Stockholm）安置驳船，如今已被闲置废弃。通过合同细节，洛发现政府为非法移民提供了极其优渥的待遇，包括专职洗衣服务、出租车接送以及定制餐饮服务，其奢华程度“简直就像住在非常舒适的酒店里一样”。更令公众担忧的是，政府目前甚至无法掌握英国境内非法居留者的确切总人数。罗根对此感叹，这与美国过去四年间至少涌入1000万非法移民的疯狂局面如出一辙。针对这一溃败局面，洛向罗根展示了他起草的《大规模驱逐文件》（Mass Deportation Document）。该文件从宪法根源上剖析了当前治理瘫痪的成因，提出了具体的宪政修正方案，并规划了如何依法拘留并驱逐非法入境者和外籍罪犯。洛的主张十分纯粹：“非法就是非法”（illegal means illegal）。在解决迫在眉睫的非法滞留和犯罪分子问题后，国家必须进一步面对那些长期不工作、终身依附福利体系、且在文化和宗教价值观上与本土基督教传统严重割裂的人群。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 英国移民治理危机与应对路径 accDescr: 展示非法移民滞留、高昂福利成本与洛提出的大规模驱逐路线图之间的关系 subgraph Problem["当前移民体制危机"] A["非法小船抵英 / 滞留"] --> B["耗费巨资安置 (酒店/驳船/专车/洗衣)"] A --> C["外籍罪犯积压监狱"] B --> D["纳税人承担终身福利负担"] end subgraph Solution["《大规模驱逐文件》执行路径"] E["修正宪法与法律障碍"] --> F["拘留并遣返非法偷渡者与罪犯"] F --> G["整顿长期福利依附与未融入群体"] end Problem -.->|"亟待纠偏"| Solution ``` --- ### [14:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=861s) 平行司法系统：英国境内被默许的伊斯兰教法法庭在谈及未融入英国主流社会的移民群体时，洛指出他们正逐渐形成封闭的社群，并在其中推行伊斯兰教法（Sharia law），甚至设立了独立运转的“伊斯兰教法法庭”（Sharia courts）。罗根对此感到震惊，追问英国政府是否承认这一套平行司法系统的存在。洛解释道，官方虽然没有正式承认，但在实际操作中选择了“默许”与纵容，任由这些社群在自己的法庭和规则下实施内部执法与惩戒。罗根对此进行了激烈的批判，他以美国熔炉文化为例，强调多元文化固然美好，但前提是所有人必须遵守所在国的世俗法律。如果一个国家接纳了来自原教旨主义背景的群体，却允许他们将原籍国落后、严苛且歧视女性的法律移植过来，整个文明体系就将面临瓦解。罗根指出，西方社会自诩包容和进步，但若包容过度到“敞开大门迎接罪犯，把财富拱手相送，并任由其逐渐接管国家”，最终只会重蹈古罗马斗兽场和古希腊文明衰落的覆辙。 - **平行司法体系的存在**：英国部分封闭穆斯林社群内部设有伊斯兰教法法庭，行使事实上的裁决权并受到官方默许。 - **文明与价值观冲突**：教法社群在对待女性权益、社会习俗（如禁狗）及世俗法治上与西方现代文明存在深刻冲突。 - **罗根关于文明衰落的论述**：历史上的伟大帝国并非不可战胜，毫无原则的妥协与引入不认同本土法治的群体是导致社会崩溃的典型催化剂。 --- ### [16:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=992s) 黎巴嫩历史教训与民间众筹调查报告为了说明人口结构改变对国家命运的颠覆性影响，洛以黎巴嫩的历史演变作为警示。1948年独立之初的黎巴嫩曾是一个充满自信、开放富足且以基督徒为主导的国家，拥有中东顶尖的大学和自由包容的社会风气，20世纪60年代的贝鲁特更是享有“中东巴黎”的盛名。然而，当穆斯林人口比例突破约15%后，德鲁兹派、马龙派基督徒与穆斯林群体之间的矛盾急剧激化，最终爆发了毁灭性的内战。如今的黎巴嫩已彻底演变为主体为穆斯林的国家，并在事实上受到伊朗支持的真主党掌控。洛进一步披露，英国政府和工党因深层政治利益考量，长期掩盖重大社会问题。以席卷英国多地的“诱拐强奸团伙”（rape gangs）丑闻为例，官方始终拒绝启动具有法律效力的法定调查（statutory inquiry）。为此，洛与团队通过2万名普通英国民众众筹了约60万英镑，在完全客观中立的立场下自行撰写并发布了调查报告。埃隆·马斯克（Elon Musk）在社交平台上的公开发声也推动了公众对这一长期被掩盖丑闻的关注。 --- ### [19:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=1196s) 媒体失职与邮寄选票背后的政治利益链当罗根质问英国公众为何对这些触目惊心的危机长期蒙在鼓里时，洛直截了当地指出这是“媒体的彻底失职”。媒体本应作为独立机构监督国家权力的失败，然而在现实中，主流媒体与政治精英却为了维系选票利益选择性失明。洛深入剖析了工党包庇这些问题的内在政治逻辑：英国推行的宽松“邮寄选票制度”（postal voting）在各大内陆城市和特定移民聚居区形成了牢固的伊斯兰“阵营选票”（bloc vote）。历史上，这些选区一直是工党的铁票仓，政客们为了攫取并巩固权力，选择将道德原则抛诸脑后。不过，洛也观察到当前的政治版图正在发生分裂，部分群体开始转而支持激进的穆斯林独立候选人，甚至有多名此类议员已进入议会与洛同僚。洛强调，必须彻底改革邮寄选票制度，斩断政治利益对国家法治与安全的绑架。 - **媒体监督缺位**：主流媒体未能履行监督职责，对平行法庭和有组织犯罪保持沉默。 - **选票利益绑架政策**：工党长期依赖特定族群的邮寄阵营选票维系政权，导致政治利益凌驾于法治原则之上。 - **选民结构的新变数**：传统工党铁票仓正出现分化，部分选区开始选出代表特定宗教诉求的穆斯林独立议员。 ### [20:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=1234s) 针对英国诱拐性侵团伙的独立民间调查与国家掩盖鲁珀特·洛（Rupert Lowe）详细讲述了他与团队发起的一项针对英国大规模诱拐性侵团伙（Grooming Gangs / Rape Gangs）的深度调查。这项工作历时一年多，由罗瑟勒姆虐童案的幸存者萨米·伍德豪斯（Sammy Woodhouse）牵头——她当年曾遭强奸并被迫生下施暴者的孩子。调查团队组织了正规的证人材料卷宗，并在伦敦举行了为期两周的民间听证会，由大律师格雷厄姆·史密斯（Graeme Smith）主持并负责撰写最终调查报告。鲁珀特·洛强调，他们开展调查并非带着既定成见，起因是在查阅部分已被定罪者的法庭审判记录时，发现官方不仅试图掩盖真相，甚至导致部分历史法庭记录莫名“消失”，这促使他们全力呼吁公开保留记录并成立民间听证。随着调查深入，权力和有组织虐待背后的文化与族群特征逐渐无法回避。报告揭示，受害者绝大多数是英国白人工人阶级女孩，而施暴团伙成员绝大部分来自具有伊斯兰文化背景的群体，尤其是巴基斯坦（其中绝大部分来自米尔普尔地区），此外还涉及孟加拉国、索马里和厄立特里亚等国的移民。鲁珀特·洛指出，尽管白人群体中同样存在强奸犯，但规模和组织化程度根本无法与这些团伙相提并论。报告直面探讨了文化视角的巨大落差：一个开放、高信任的基督教文明对女性的认知，与某些伊斯兰原教旨文化中对女性（特别是异教徒女性）的蔑视存在根本冲突。鲁珀特·洛认为，正是这份详实的独立报告形成的外界压力，迫使英国政府最终表态将启动具有法定传唤权的正式国家法定调查（Statutory Inquiry）。 - 调查由幸存者萨米·伍德豪斯主持推进，大律师格雷厄姆·史密斯负责听证监管与报告执笔。 - 涉案诱拐团伙具有高度集中的族裔特征：以巴基斯坦米尔普尔（Mirpur）移民为主，兼有孟加拉国、索马里及厄立特里亚等国背景，受害者集中于白人底层女孩。 - 历史调查如2014年《杰伊报告》（Jay Report）和《凯西报告》（Casey Report）早已证实此类犯罪严重存在，但官方此前始终将其定性为个别孤立社区的小概率事件。 ### [23:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=1410s) 官方数据瞒报、多元文化主义神话与言论自由的压制英国国家机器长期以来系统性地回避甚至拒绝收集施暴者的族裔犯罪数据。鲁珀特·洛批评道，警方、国民保健署（NHS）以及社会福利部门在记录严重罪案时普遍缺乏准确的种族分类数据，导致公众无法通过官方统计直观评估特定群体中异常畸高的犯罪率。作为国会议员，洛通过多次提出议会书面质询（Parliamentary Questions），才迫使政府逐步披露部分真相。他认为，体制内官员并非不知道正在发生什么，而是害怕承认战后的“多元文化主义实验”彻底破产——当年伊诺克·鲍威尔（Enoch Powell）在著名的“血流成河”（Rivers of Blood）演说中发出预警，却遭到了残酷的政治围剿；自托尼·布莱尔（Tony Blair）执政以来，“隐性偏见”（unconscious bias）和觉醒主义DEI教条渗透了整个英国官僚体系，公职人员宁愿坐视少女受害，也极其恐惧被贴上“种族主义”或“偏见”的标签。乔·罗根对此深感震惊，并将话题延伸至言论自由的沦陷：英国目前每年有超过12,000人因在社交媒体上的言论而遭警方逮捕，体制对思想与言辞的钳制令人窒息。罗根指出，美国前几年同样深陷这种极左思潮的泥潭，但随着唐纳德·特朗普重塑政治格局以及埃隆·马斯克收购推特（Twitter / X）恢复真正的言论自由，觉醒主义的控制力才开始显著减弱。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 英国体制对恶性案件的掩盖逻辑链 accDescr: 展示政治正确、多元文化神话如何导致官僚系统失职并压制言论自由的因果流程图 subgraph Ideology ["意识形态束缚"] A["战后多元文化主义政策"] B["DEI与政治正确教条 恐惧被扣'种族主义'帽子"] end subgraph StateAction ["官僚系统瞒报行为"] C["警察/NHS隐瞒施暴者族裔数据"] D["压制与消匿法庭公开记录"] E["将系统性犯罪定性为局部个案"] end subgraph Suppression ["公众反制与打压"] F["民间调查与议会质询揭露真相"] G["国家严厉打击网络异见言论 (每年上万人因帖被捕)"] end A --> B B --> C B --> D C & D --> E E --> F B --> G ``` ### [25:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=1558s) 英国枪支管制与鲁珀特·洛遭遇的“政治暗杀”搜查当罗根感叹英国公众面对年复一年的言论逮捕竟然没有“武装反抗”（up in arms），随即意识到普通英国人根本没有持枪权时，鲁珀特·洛谈及了英国严酷的枪支管控以及他亲历的荒谬遭遇。洛表示，自己作为农场主合法拥有枪支，常在乡间打猎，但普通民众想要合法获得任何枪械都难如登天。2025年年初，在改革党（Reform UK）内部发生政治决裂期间，洛遭到了恶意的“政治暗杀式诬告”——有人向警方虚假指控他曾在议会声称自己枪法极好并威胁要开枪射杀齐亚·优素福（Zia Yusuf）。尽管鲁珀特·洛没有任何犯罪记录、经商多年并雇佣大量员工，而且还是现任国会议员，武装警察却在未经核实的情况下，于当晚9点半突袭搜查了他的住所，直到夜里11点45分才离开。监控完整记录下了四名全副武装的警员强行收缴了他所有的猎枪与弹药的过程。洛花费了整整五六个月的时间和繁琐法律程序才追回自己的合法枪支。他感慨道，英国自20世纪90年代末邓布兰惨案（Dunblane massacre）发生后，就全面取缔了手枪——洛的父亲早年代表牛津大学参加手枪射击比赛所使用的纪念手枪也全数被政府强行收缴。整个国家机器竭尽全力限制合法守法公民持有武器，剥夺个人自由，整个社会急需一场根本性的重构。 - 鲁珀特·洛因党内虚假指控，遭4名武装警察夜间突击搜查住宅并没收全部枪支弹药，历时5至6个月方才讨回。 - 英国在1996年邓布兰小学枪击案后通过立法彻底禁止民用手枪，导致大批守法射击爱好者及运动员的枪械被悉数收缴。 - 如今合法持有猎枪面临严苛的执照审批，当局持续收紧飞碟射击与合法狩猎的生存空间。 ### [27:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=1678s) “双重标准执法”、南港惨案与达沃斯全球主义议程鲁珀特·洛进一步直指英国司法的“双重标准执法”（Two-Tier Policing）。他列举了露西·康诺利（Lucy Connolly）的案例：在南港（Southport）凶手阿克塞尔·鲁达库巴纳（Axel Rudakubana）持刀杀害三名无辜小女孩后，这位女士因在社交媒体上发布了一条情绪失控的帖子（并在4小时后自行删除），竟被法庭重判入狱32个月；与此同时，凶手早在案发前就已被英国反恐预警机制“Prevent”列为监控对象，体制却未能阻止屠杀。另一个极端案例是亨利·诺瓦克（Henry Novak）遇刺案：一名锡克教徒持刀刺伤诺瓦克后，赶到现场的警察不仅不相信受害者遭刺伤的呼救，反而粗暴地试图对流血的诺瓦克上手铐，导致其伤口撕裂并在自己的血液中窒息死亡，而真正的行凶者在现场甚至从未被戴上手铐。这种体制对本土民众的敌视引发了罗根的深思。罗根提问：英国社会如今这种“认定本土白人即原罪”的叙事，究竟是源于历史殖民负罪感的自然演变，还是幕后存在精心设计的顶层架构（Architecture by design）？鲁珀特·洛明确回答，这绝非偶然，而是高度受意识形态驱动的自上而下的规划。世界经济论坛（WEF）等全球主义精英机构长期灌输一种论调，即盎格鲁-撒克逊国家掌控了过多的全球财富与资源，进而衍生出一种盲目且扭曲的利他主义，要求西方国家将“全球福利”置于本国公民的切身利益之上。罗根随即讽刺地提及世界经济论坛创办人克劳斯·施瓦布（Klaus Schwab）那句臭名昭著的口号——“你将一无所有，但你会很幸福”（You will own nothing and you will be happy），直言这荒谬得犹如出自乔治·奥威尔的极权反乌托邦小说，根本不像是一个正常人类能堂而皇之说出口的政治宣言。 - 露西·康诺利因涉及南港恶性刺杀事件的情绪化言论入狱32个月，尽管该帖在发布4小时后即被删除。 - 南港刺杀幼女案凶手阿克塞尔·鲁达库巴纳早已录入英国反恐预警机制“Prevent”，但官方机构未能有效介入。 - 受害者亨利·诺瓦克遭刺后反被警方施加手铐致死，而行凶者未受同等压制，凸显英国警务执法的严重双标与失序。 - 两人探讨了以达沃斯（WEF）为代表的全球主义精英如何利用逆向种族叙事与去所有权化构想，实质性拆解民族国家公民的基本权益。 ### [30:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=1856s) 奥威尔预言的现实化与西方文明的自我瓦解 Joe Rogan 与 Rupert Lowe 从乔治·奥威尔（George Orwell）的预言谈起。Rogan 感慨，高中读《一九八四》时总觉得这种离奇的世界纯属作者的疯狂想象，绝不可能在现实中发生；然而随着时间推移，现实甚至比奥威尔描绘的还要悲观与荒谬。Lowe 赞叹奥威尔具有惊人的前瞻性，曾参加西班牙内战，对“集体主义国家主义”（collectivist statism）抱有健康的怀疑，本质上是一位坚定捍卫个人主义的特立独行者。两人列举了当今西方社会的诸多荒诞现状：拥有生理男性特征的运动员以跨性别女性身份参加女子比赛并出入女性更衣室；激进派高喊“在偷来的土地上没有人是非法的”（no one's illegal on stolen land），呼吁全面开放边境。Lowe 直言，西方目前正在亲手摧毁曾经造就自身伟大的一切。Rogan 强调，移民本身没有错，但在没有审核其是否是杀人犯的情况下敞开边境完全脱离现实。他举例说，在巴基斯坦卡拉奇（Karachi）的街头，如果一名女性穿着超短裙走在路上，下场可想而知；世界远非人人遵纪守法的乌托邦。 Lowe 对此深表赞同，直指巴基斯坦在很多方面犹如一个“流氓国家”（rogue state），其对待不遵从伊斯兰教法（Sharia）全包头巾的女性，在某些圣训甚至虐待女童团伙报告中被视作待宰的肉类。他无法理解，为何一个原本高度开放、高度互信的现代社会，会容忍这种部族化、倒退的封闭文化扎根其内部，进而瓦解英国历经千年建立起来的文明根基。 - 乔治·奥威尔在西班牙内战后形成的深刻洞察，使其成为反对集体主义国家主义与捍卫个人自由的代表。 - Rogan 指责当代过度政治正确导致对基本事实的否定，如跨性别者参与女性体育竞技及完全否定国界主权。 - Lowe 指出，将完全封闭保守的文化无条件植入高互信开放社会，正从内部侵蚀现代文明。 --- ### [33:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=2026s) 脆弱的文明、同化失败与非法移民的规模 Rogan 抨击当下只要承认“某些文化比另一些文化更为优越”，或者指出某些文化仍停留在数千年前的蛮荒生活方式，就会被扣上“种族主义”的帽子。他强调，任何人都有信仰自由，但前提是宗教规则不得凌驾于社会共同商定的公正法律之上。一旦某个群体占领整个城镇并推行古代戒律，不仅毫无融入可言，更会导致整个国家被逐步蚕食；文明并不是坚不可摧的堡垒，几场危机就足以让其彻底倾覆。Lowe 引用玛格丽特·撒切尔（Margaret Thatcher）的名言指出，自由极其脆弱，如果不主动捍卫就必然丧失，而法治的核心在于“法律面前人人平等”。Lowe 回顾英国历史，表示英国曾是高度宽容的社会，接纳了欧洲受迫害的犹太人和法国胡格诺派新教徒，但过去的移民选择了同化并积极贡献社会；合理的移民制度必须是有限的、有针对性的，且申请者必须认同本地的文化与法律。当 Rogan 追问面对合法定居后却推行伊斯兰教法的人群以及海量非法移民时，究竟该如何实施驱逐（是否挨家挨户敲门抓人）时，Lowe 回应称首要任务必须是彻底切断偷渡通道。根据国际法，穿越多个安全国家的难民本就不应在英国境内申请庇护。关于非法移民数量，Lowe 估计目前在英国非法居住的人口约为 180 万至 200 万人。至于穿越英吉利海峡的新增偷渡者，海况平静时单日抵英人数可高达 1000 人，恶劣天气时则较少。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 英国非法移民危机链条 accDescr: 展示偷渡者跨越安全国、英国高额支出补贴、边防护送安置与本土平行社会形成的恶性循环 subgraph ChannelCrossing ["海峡偷渡与资金流向"] A["穿越多个安全国家"] --> B["乘坐拥挤充气小艇偷渡"] C["英国每年向法国支付逾5亿英镑"] -.->|"未能有效遏制"| B end subgraph UKReception ["英国境内的福利与优待"] B --> D["边境巡逻队接应并分发饮用水"] D --> E["免费安置于豪华酒店并发放福利金"] E --> F["获得NHS牙科优先看诊权 （本地英国人无法享受）"] end subgraph SocialConsequence ["长期社会后果"] F --> G["拒绝同化与无视本土法律"] G --> H["形成推行伊斯兰教法的平行社会 （如英国伊斯兰聚居区/密歇根迪尔伯恩）"] end ``` - 英国每年向法国政府支付超过 5 亿英镑以协助遏阻偷渡，但海上小艇依然源源不绝。 - 估算英国目前的非法滞留人口约为 180 万至 200 万之间。 - 英吉利海峡海况良好时，单日偷渡抵英人数甚至可达 1000 人。 --- ### [37:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=2266s) 荒谬的福利激励与左翼意识形态的自相矛盾 Lowe 愤怒地指出，边防巡逻队在海上打捞起偷渡者后，递给他们瓶装水，随即接送并安置进酒店，提供全额福利补贴，这些人旋即申请难民身份。但事实上，他们绝大多数是纯粹的“经济移民”（economic migrants），而英国的“觉醒文化”（woke culture）彻底置英国本土国民的利益于不顾。更荒唐的是，由于制度倾斜，这些偷渡者在英国国民保健署（NHS）竟能获得免费牙科治疗的优先排期，而本国纳税人却面临牙医资源极度匮乏、甚至根本挂不上号的窘境。巨大的经济诱惑（免费住宿、现金津贴与医疗优待）促使成千上万人穿越无数欧洲安全国涌入英国，并逐渐在全国各地建立起拥有独立法律与文化的“平行社会”（parallel societies）。谈到文化冲突，Rogan 指出美国也出现了类似现象，例如密歇根州的迪尔伯恩（Dearborn）。该市近期举行了数万人走上街头的巨型伊斯兰游行；讽刺的是，当地此前备受极度包容、鼓吹多元文化的进步派支持，然而保守的伊斯兰群体一旦在市政掌权，通过的第一项举措就是在公立场所全面禁止悬挂 LGBTQ 彩虹骄傲旗（Pride flag）。两人嘲讽了西方白左阵营中“酷儿支持巴勒斯坦”（Queers for Palestine）的荒谬口号。Rogan 戏谑网络热梗“巴勒斯坦对酷儿的态度”（Palestine for queers），现实中就是将同性恋从楼顶扔下处决。Lowe 补充道，英国绿党（Green Party）的领导人其实是一位公开的犹太同性恋者，若激进宗教势力夺权，其处境必然极度危险；但即便如此，西方的进步派政客依然视若无睹，继续盲目迎合这些与自由价值彻底敌对的极端意识形态。 - 偷渡抵达英国者不仅获得免费酒店安置和福利金，更享有 NHS 牙科优先看诊待遇，引发本国纳税人强烈愤慨。 - 密歇根州迪尔伯恩的穆斯林保守派掌权后，第一项决策即为在市政建筑禁止悬挂代表性少数群体的彩虹旗。 - 两人批评“Queers for Palestine”暴露出西方进步左派对伊斯兰激进神权现实认知的严重脱节。 ### [40:19](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=2419s) 进步主义的认知盲区与极度严苛的宗族礼法乔·罗根与鲁珀特·洛（Rupert Lowe）谈及某些封闭社会中极端的父权结构。在这些环境中，女性完全沦为二等公民，不仅在着装规范上受到严苛限制，一旦被指控通奸，甚至会面临被乱石砸死（stoning to death）的残酷极刑。乔·罗根提到自己曾看过一段令人毛骨悚然的视频，一名父亲亲手用石头砸死了自己的亲生女儿；此外，家族中的兄弟也常常因女儿“让家族蒙羞”而痛下杀手，即所谓的“荣誉谋杀”（honor killings）。乔·罗根尖锐地质疑：那些自诩为进步主义（progressive）的人士，为何会对此类行径选择性失明甚至变相包庇？在他看来，这完全源于一种深入骨髓的恐惧——害怕被扣上“种族主义者”的帽子。为了避免这种指责，西方左翼群体不惜在精神上进行复杂的“思维体操”（mental gymnastics），全盘接纳与自身核心理念完全相悖的极端宗族习俗，任由教条主义践踏基本逻辑与常识。鲁珀特·洛对此表示强烈共鸣。他指出，英国本土的“Me Too”女权运动展现出惊人的双重标准，面对这种封闭、宗族式的部族文化时几乎彻底失声。他在新发布的调查报告中列举了一个触目惊心的司法现实：在巴基斯坦的某些法律规定下，女性若控告一名男性强奸，必须找出四名成年的男性目击证人，且证人必须宣誓证明自己亲眼目睹了强奸者的侵入过程。如果受害女性无法拿出这样的证据，反而会被反咬一口判定为通奸或诬陷，从而被直接投进监狱。至今仍有大量女性因为无法满足这一荒谬的举证要求而身陷巴基斯坦囹圄。洛直言，这种意识形态与西方文明如同“水与油”（cultural oil and water），在根本上完全无法融合。 ### [42:36](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=2556s) 文化的“水油不容”：对女性的物化与极端圣战思维在分析这些部族群体的心理机制时，鲁珀特·洛强调，他们的首要效忠对象永远是血缘宗族和宗教诫命，而非接纳他们的收留国及其世俗法律。他们甚至利用各种宗教判例（Hadith）来为恶行开脱：在他们的认知体系里，强暴一名白人女孩根本不算通奸；而未按其宗教规范着装的西方女性，在他们眼中不过是任人践踏和凌辱的“肉”（meat）。洛对比指出，英国社会早已演化为充分尊重女性、赋予女性崇高地位与权力的现代文明，而某些极端教条本质上是对女性自主意识的病态恐惧，女性割礼（FGM）的大量存在便是有力铁证。除非有一个强有力的政府坚决捍卫选民，抵御一切颠覆本土文明核心价值观的恶劣行径，否则这种文化冲突绝无调和的可能。乔·罗根对“肉”这一极其冷血的词汇感到震惊，追问他们是否真的在口语中如此称呼受害女性。洛确认这正是报告记录的原始表述与思维逻辑，并提及历史上托马斯·杰斐逊（Thomas Jefferson）在面对巴巴里海盗（Barbary pirates）奴役和虐待囚犯时得到的冷血回答——在这些极端神权观念中，奴隶制与对异教徒的奴役是完全正当的。洛指出，在他们的一手调查记录中，确有犯罪分子赤裸裸地将不穿戴穆斯林服饰的白人女孩直接比喻为“肉”，这充分证明此类罪行并非单纯的偶发冲动，而是建立在深层的道德去人性化与意识形态优越感之上。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 极端宗族犯罪的意识形态与行为链条 accDescr: 展示从宗族效忠、异教徒降格、去人性化到有组织犯罪的运作路径 subgraph Ideology ["意识形态根基"] A["宗族与极端教法效忠 高于世俗法律"] --> B["将异教徒视作贱民 否认其基本人权"] B --> C["对未蒙头女性去人性化 蔑称为任人处置的'肉'"] end subgraph Exploitation ["有组织侵害网络"] C --> D["目标诱拐：10至11岁女童"] D --> E["跨区域人口贩运 / 毒品 / 强迫卖淫"] E --> F["极端虐待、拍摄与强迫皈依"] end subgraph Coverup ["制度性包庇与噤声"] G["官僚系统降级调查 粉饰为孤立事件"] H["左翼畏惧被斥'种族歧视' 选择性视而不见"] end C -.-> H E -.-> G ``` ### [45:26](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=2726s) 英国强奸犯罪团伙调查报告：触目惊心的全国性黑幕随着话题深入，乔·罗根向鲁珀特·洛询问其团队刚刚公布的英国强奸团伙调查报告中，受害者总人数的推算究竟有多骇人。洛神情凝重地宣布，根据极其审慎保守的测算，全英至少有**25万（a quarter of a million）**名受害者，而实际数字很可能远高于此。洛透露，官方与主流政客长期以来试图粉饰太平，将丑闻局限在罗奇代尔（Rochdale）或布拉德福德（Bradford）等少数几个已知热点，甚至刻意削弱法定独立调查的职权范围，妄图将其定性为“孤立的地方治安问题”。但洛的团队在报告中列出了全英至少**147个**正在发生此类罪恶的城镇；报告每公开一次，他们就会收到来自全国各地潮水般的求助信与私信，民众甚至悲愤地追问为何康沃尔郡的雷德鲁斯（Redruth）等偏远地区也被遗漏。洛痛批英国政府失职，长期故意不收集相关族裔与案件的系统性犯罪数据，导致议员们不得不持续发起游说，倒逼官方建立统计机制以查明真相。洛进一步揭露，这些强奸恶行与高度组织化的黑帮犯罪、跨国贩毒网络以及强迫卖淫深度捆绑： - 受害女孩往往在极幼小的年龄就被圈禁，被塞进皮卡车后斗甚至铁笼中运往全英各地轮奸。 - 听证会上记录了灭绝人性的惨剧，包括强迫受害女童遭受恶犬的强暴与鸡奸，施暴者则在旁围观录像。 - 犯罪分子肆意施加人格侮辱，例如强迫女性跪地舔舐施暴者的脚底，以此确立绝对的支配与奴役地位。 - 这种权力欲望与历史上的十字军东征如出一辙：自视高人一等的施暴者以惩罚“异教徒”（infidels）为己任，不仅导致大量女童怀孕，还强迫她们皈依伊斯兰教，甚至有多名受害女孩被拐卖至沙特阿拉伯和巴基斯坦。洛表示，作为新当选的国会议员，他已将该份重磅调查报告的PDF电子版发送给了全英每一位议员，并正陆续派发纸质实体书，誓要逼迫掌握权力的高层直面这起惊天丑闻。 ### [49:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=2964s) 撕下政治正确的伪装：将“亚裔诱拐团伙”正名为“强奸集团” 乔·罗根针对“强奸犯罪团伙”（rape gang）这一措辞展开追问，确认这绝非个别穆斯林男性的零星作案，而是具有严密组织、针对弱势女童下手的系统性猎杀。洛坚决证实了这一判断：这些黑帮团伙运作严密，有针对性地对年仅10岁或11岁的低龄幼女进行长期精神诱骗（grooming）与身体摧残，并在全英国建立起地下贩运网络。谈到自己在政坛的经历，洛回顾道，他在2024年7月以67岁的高龄当选为大雅茅斯选区的国会议员。进入下议院后，他发现政客和媒体普遍使用极其荒谬的委婉语——“亚裔诱拐团伙”（Asian grooming gangs）。洛认为这种政治正确的称谓不仅极度虚伪，更是对日本人等其他守法亚裔族群的公然抹黑，因为其他亚裔文化中根本不存在这种恶行。借由埃隆·马斯克（Elon Musk）收购推特（X）后掀起的言论自由浪潮，洛选择在议会发表演讲时彻底打破禁忌。他直接在下议院发言中挑明，这绝非虚无缥缈的亚裔问题，而是真真切切的“**巴基斯坦裔穆斯林强奸团伙**”（Pakistani Muslim rape gangs）。该番直言不讳的发言不仅被白纸黑字永久载入英国议会议事录（Hansard），更在下议院引发了巨大震动。洛坦言，自己或许不是政界最精明圆滑的人，但他步入议会唯一的目的就是揭露真相并彻底扭转治理体系，“我进议会不是为了混日子，我只想说真话”。 ### [51:20](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=3080s) 弃商从政的缘由与英国面临的系统性危机鲁珀特·洛威（Rupert Lowe）谈及自己的个人背景与从政动机。他表示自己将议员工资全额捐给慈善机构，并非把政治当作谋生手段。他回顾了自己丰富的人生经历：曾长期担任英超南安普敦足球俱乐部（Southampton F.C.）的主席，主导修建了圣玛丽球场，建立了著名的青训营，还曾打过竞技曲棍球。他动情地回忆，2003年带领球队闯入足总杯决赛（虽以 0 比 1 惜败于阿森纳）是他一生中最美好的日子之一。洛威强调，自己之所以投身政界，纯粹是因为“总得有人站出来做这件事”；如果不在2029年之前做出根本性改变，从他所见来看，英国将陷入“晚期衰退”（terminal decline）。作为英国下议院公共账目委员会（Public Accounts Committee）的成员，洛威目睹了体制内的巨大弊端：公帑浪费严重、官僚缺乏问责、公务员系统脱离所应服务的民众、国家债务逼近国内生产总值（GDP）的 100%、武器国防采购资金被严重错配，以及司法系统中的欺诈行为。当乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）插话说这听起来与美国当下的问题如出一辙时，洛威表示认同，指出在拜登政府时期的美国也有类似乱象，正如埃隆·马斯克（Elon Musk）等人所揭露的，美国国际开发署（USAID）将大量纳税人的资金错误分配到世界各地，甚至有一部分流入了英国本土的“觉醒”（woke）事业。洛威表示，无论幕后推手是世界经济论坛（WEF）、比尔德堡集团（Bilderbergers）、外交关系协会（CFR）还是其他恶性力量，英国人民都必须团结起来扭转局势。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 英国深层危机与改革倡议 accDescr: 展现鲁珀特·洛威指出的英国多维衰退问题以及破局设想。 subgraph S1["治理与财务弊端"] A["公共账目委员会发现浪费与问责缺失"] B["国债逼近 GDP 100%"] C["国防采购与司法公信力崩塌"] end subgraph S2["外部渗透与意识形态"] D["国际资金资助觉醒议程"] E["跨国组织与既得利益影响"] end subgraph S3["改革出路"] F["动员公众觉醒并在2029年前扭转局势"] end A --> F B --> F C --> F D --> F E --> F ``` - 个人经历：洛威在伦敦金融城（City of London）从业长达20年，精通金融，创办并管理过多套商业实体，曾担任英超南安普敦俱乐部主席。 - 政治承诺：宣布自己不是传统政客，不以权谋私，并将全部议员工资捐出。 ### [53:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=3220s) 诱拐强奸集团丑闻与主流媒体的集体沉默罗根询问，是否存在有人否认英国诱拐强奸集团（grooming gangs）严重性这一情况，当面对确凿数字时工党等各方作何反应。洛威直言，工党毫无疑问在选择性视而不见。他和支持者曾要求设立法定调查，最终只能通过众筹展开民间调查，但官方与体制的反应极其冷漠。最令洛威愤慨的是英国主流媒体的彻底失语。由全民强制交税（电视执照费）资助的垄断性国家公共广播机构——英国广播公司（BBC），对此项关乎重大公共利益的全国性丑闻完全没有进行任何报道；天空新闻台（Sky News）和《每日电讯报》（The Daily Telegraph）也基本未做正视，仅有 GB News 的帕特里克·克里斯蒂（Patrick Christys）在一个晚间节目中做了一点零星报道。洛威痛批这是一个极其严重的国家级丑闻，理应得到彻底、公开的审查。 - 垄断性媒体噤声：BBC 对民间众筹揭露的严重强奸集团丑闻只字不提。 - 少数发声渠道：仅独立或新兴保守倾向媒体（如 GB News）对此展开过极少量的讨论。 ### [54:40](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=3280s) 剖析 BBC 的蜕变与传统媒体对老一辈认知的信息茧房洛威回顾了 BBC 的历史：它由约翰·里斯勋爵（John Reith）在1920年代创立，初衷是“告知、教育和娱乐”，里斯勋爵本人是个极具原则的人，在当时确实发挥了积极作用。然而在数字时代，年轻人早已不再依赖 BBC 获取资讯，而是转向 Breitbart 或社交网络等多元平台；但讽刺的是，只要英国民众想收看直播电视或体育赛事，依然必须被强制征收电视执照费（TV Licence）。罗根对此补充指出，美英两国社会中都有大量群体（尤其是老年人）深受传统机构媒体的影响。对这部分人来说，只要一件事没有登上《纽约时报》或 CNN，在心理上它就不算“正统新闻”，就会被自动打上“边缘言论”或“阴谋论”的标签。他们成长于传统媒体时代，不完全理解互联网，也不用 X（原 Twitter）。因此，当 BBC 这种受信任的老牌媒体选择掩盖或不报道某事时，这类人群便得以继续“理直气壮地保持无知”。 - BBC 创立原则：由里斯勋爵在20世纪20年代奠定，口号为“inform, educate and entertain”。 - 体制垄断收费：即便数字化资讯普及，民众只要拥有电视接收设备仍被强制要求支付电视执照费。 ### [57:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=3450s) 誓言给 BBC 断资与费边社的“披着羊皮的狼” 洛威对罗根的分析完全赞同。他指出任何垄断最终都会走向堕落与变质，而马斯克收购 X 释放了言论自由，打破了垄断巨头霸凌公众言论的局面。洛威直言，BBC 每天都在“向英国的静脉中注入毒药”，其新闻报道充斥着 DEI（多元、平等、包容）和觉醒意识形态；他公开表态，如果未来能够掌握权力，他的首要任务之一就是负责任地切断对 BBC 的公共财政拨款（defund the BBC）。为了说明工党内部意识形态的根源，洛威向罗根科普了成立于1884年的费边社（Fabian Society）。他指出，包括工党前座议员甚至首相基尔·斯塔默（Keir Starmer）在内的许多高层都是费边社成员，历史上剧作家乔治·伯纳德·肖（George Bernard Shaw）亦是其代表人物。洛威透露，费边社最初的官方徽章居然是一只“披着羊皮的狼”（a wolf in sheep's clothing），而且其早期创始人多是优生学（eugenics）的支持者。罗根在调出其徽章图片后大为震惊，直呼不可思议：“这简直是对所有人智商的公然蔑视，他们甚至连掩饰都懒得掩饰了。” 洛威最后指出，正是这种长期潜伏渗透的思潮侵蚀了英国的教育体系与文化自信。他坚信英国历史绝非恶贯满盈：英国曾花费巨资单方面终结跨大西洋奴隶贸易，从宏观历史来看，英国在世界上整体而言一直是一股向善的力量。 - 费边社（Fabian Society）：成立于19世纪80年代的英国渐进社会主义智囊组织，其著名历史徽章形象为披着羊皮的狼，早期核心成员支持优生学。 - 工党渊源：工党前座领导层（包含基尔·斯塔默）大批成员隶属于该社团。 - 历史评价：洛威强调英国在废除奴隶制中付出了巨大经济代价，历史贡献总体应受到肯定。 ### [01:01:18](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=3678s) 历史遗产与大学里的反西方思潮 Rupert Lowe 回顾帝国历史时指出，比利时和法国在对待殖民地时远比英国残酷得多。相比之下，英国留下的遗产是在殖民地努力树立起法治（Rule of Law）的基础架构。他以印度及其他曾受英国管辖的国家为例，指出这些国家如今蓬勃发展，很大程度上得益于英国当年留下的制度根基。然而，令人倍感凄凉的是，英国如今仿佛开始“自我封闭与内耗”，在给其他国家留下宝贵制度遗产的同时，自己却迷失了方向，忘记了立国之本。 Joe Rogan 随即谈到，如今很多走出象牙塔的年轻人深受思潮影响，世界观令人错愕。他们对那些建立起成功现代文明的社会充满了彻头彻尾的蔑视。他们本应理性看待历史——承认“过去的人确实做过很糟糕的事，但现在的社会在让人人享有平等方面已经是一个极佳的范例；虽然并不完美，但它正朝着比过去更好的方向迈进”；然而这些年轻人却走入极端，认为现代西方的一切都是建立在滔天的暴行历史之上，因此当下必须受到惩罚。在他们的认知里，所有从历史中受益的人（特别是白人）都应当被驱逐、被噤声，并认为彻底开放边境与多元文化主义是唯一出路。 Rogan 质问道：“他们以为这些国家是怎么变得如此繁荣的？”他指出，人类的历史就是一部漫长的进步史，往回倒退几百年，人类在世界任何角落都同样愚昧野蛮，人类其实是在最近几个世纪才逐渐学会如何做更文明的人。大学里的年轻人盲目把现代制度全盘抛弃，幻想着靠社会主义能拯救一切，这是极其荒谬的。历史上没有一次社会主义实验不走向暴政，而拥护者却永远拿“那是他们没有用正确的方式去实行”当作遮羞布。Rogan 强调，这种“结果平等”在现实中根本行不通，因为任何人在经历上学、打工、竞技体育后都会明白，世界上从来不存在所谓的“付出平等”；一旦抹杀了追求成功的物质与精神奖励，社会就绝不可能孕育出璀璨的文明成就。 - 英国殖民留下的核心遗产是制度与法治，印度的发展与法治传统均受益于此。 - 年轻一代在大学灌输下往往忽视社会的渐进式改良，把复杂的历史进步全盘否定为暴行并要求历史清算。 - 无论在学业、体育还是工作中，“付出绝无平等”，因此追求“结果平等”必然违背现实规律。 --- ### [01:04:26](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=3866s) 资本主义激励机制与学术界思想多元性的丧失谈到现代科技与商业文明，Rogan 强调，人们周围之所以能拥有绚丽的电视机、Starlink（星链）卫星网络以及无数便捷设施，核心动力正是资本主义带来的创新激励。资本主义并不意味着非要通过坑害他人来获利，它完全可以人道、明智且合乎道德地运行。消费者拥有“用钞票投票”的权利，可以通过抵制违背道德的公司来迫使商业向善；但如果因为弊病就把整个制度全盘抛弃并倒退回社会主义，无异于因噎废食。 Rogan 进一步将矛头对准了大学教育中保守派声音被系统性排斥的现状。尤其是在社会学、心理学等文科领域，学术界几乎被清一色的自由派把持。他反问，难道历史学者中就没有保守派吗？大学如果真要倡导多元化，除了国籍、性别和性取向的多样性，更关键的应当是“思想的多样性（diversity of opinion）”。检验一个观点是否站得住脚的唯一方法，就是让持完全反对意见的人同台辩论、“一决高下”。然而，现在的大学动辄以“言论让学生感到不安全”或将发言者污名化为“纳粹”为由，通过拉响火警警报、聚众抗议和叫嚣尖叫来剥夺演讲者的发声权利。Rogan 痛批这是美国教育体系的巨大倒退。大学本应训练年轻大脑去沟通、辩论，并在步入社会前学会独立思考；而如今那些一味通过封杀异见来回避辩论的人，才是“思考与进步的真正敌人”。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 大学思辨教育与言论压制的对比 accDescr: 对比健康的多元思想辩论机制与当前大学封杀异见导致的教育退化 subgraph Healthy["健康的思想辩论模式"] A["多元观点碰撞\n（保守派 vs 自由派）"] --> B["公开辩论与质询\n（用更好论点交锋）"] B --> C["培育独立心智\n学会理性沟通与现实决策"] end subgraph Suppressed["当前的象牙塔困境"] D["单一同质化意识形态"] --> E["贴标签与压制异见\n（扣帽子/拉火警/剥夺话语权）"] E --> F["思维退化与认知偏狭\n缺乏面对现实世界的能力"] end ``` --- ### [01:07:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=4028s) 个人主义与集体主义的较量：从竞技体育到国家控制 Rupert Lowe 对 Rogan 的言论深表赞同，并指出健康的社会必须捍卫言论自由，同时保留一定程度的优胜劣汰法则。他认为如今的英国正在推行一种“反向达尔文主义（reverse Darwinian theory）”。在 Lowe 年轻求学的时代，人们在橄榄球或曲棍球场上全力以赴争夺胜利并以此为荣；然而如今的英国学校却把“渴望获胜”当成负面行为，试图让所有孩子不论付出多少都得到相同对待，甚至在体育运动中弱化竞争。针对这一点，Rogan 指出英国缺乏美国校园里深厚的摔跤（wrestling）传统。摔跤运动员对“任人唯贤（meritocracy）”的理解比任何人都深刻，因为在那块垫子上，没有任何虚伪和侥幸可言，不拼尽全力就绝不可能取胜。 Lowe 指出，这一切的根源正是个人主义（individualism）与集体主义（collectivism）之间由来已久的对抗： - **集体主义的本能**：集体天然想要限制、压制独立个体的发展。 - **国家机器的恐惧**：国家官僚体制最忌惮的就是那些极具成就、具备独立思想且敢于公开发声辩论的精英公民。 - **政策层面的打压**：在英国，政府正通过严苛的税收与无休止的规章制度，惩罚那些勤勤恳恳工作养家的纳税人。这些人自尊自强、不愿依赖福利体系，但国家设置的条条框框却在全方位打击他们的积极性。 --- ### [01:08:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=4129s) 盎格鲁-撒克逊创新传统与合法移民对秩序的认同 Lowe 进一步阐述，社会的活力与真理往往源于繁荣的家族企业、具备自足能力的社区以及能公开进行观点碰撞的民间对话。历史上，人类现代最卓越的各项发明大量涌现自英国、美国等盎格鲁-撒克逊世界，正是因为个人主义在这些土壤中得到了充分呵护并造福全人类；而如今，这种宝贵的传统正被他称为“中央规划者（central planners）”的官僚阶层逐步摧毁。 Rogan 对此补充道，美国历史上的许多伟大发明实际上出自合法的外国移民之手。这些人背井离乡来到美国，正是因为他们由衷认同并向往美国所代表的自由与奋斗精神，而这些抱负在他们的原生国家根本无法实现。两人谈到，无论在英国还是美国，那些历经艰辛、走正规程序归化的合法移民，往往是最坚定支持社会秩序与制度结构的人群： - **合法移民的心态**：他们为经历漫长努力取得合法身份而感到无比自豪，由衷尊重所在国的宪政与法治框架。 - **反对开放边境**：在美国与英国，绝大多数合法移民对大开国门的“完全开放边境”政策持强烈反对态度，因为他们绝不希望看到自己千辛万苦所融入并珍视的社会秩序毁于一旦。 - **年轻一代的觉醒**：Lowe 与 Rogan 均观察到，很多整日沉浸在互联网环境中的年轻一代，正在重新审视这些现实问题并产生思想共鸣。 ### [01:10:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=4212s) 婴儿潮一代的财富锁死与青年阶层的困境鲁珀特·洛（Rupert Lowe）指出，在英国乃至西方社会，大量财富牢牢掌握在“婴儿潮一代”（Baby Boomers）手中。现年 68 岁的洛自称处于这代人的尾声，而该群体的主力目前集中在 70 至 90 岁之间。他们掌控着绝大部分的养老金与资本，但整个金融体系随之而来的是严重的“风险厌恶”。洛强调，风险本质上是推动社会前进的动力，企业家勇于承担风险并从中获得回报；然而，当政府用近乎苛虐的高税率将其推向消亡，便不再有人愿意冒险。在英国，婴儿潮一代只希望安安稳稳地度过晚年，资金无法顺畅地向下“层叠流动”（cascade down）到年轻人手中，年轻一代根本无法像当年长辈那样获得创造财富的土壤。乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）顺着这一话题谈到美国的现状，指出现在的年轻人同样深感“游戏规则被彻底操纵了”。房价与房租高企，食品杂货成本猛增，通货膨胀让底层挣扎求生的人苦不堪言。罗根举例提到，网络上一组令人震惊的对比数据显示，某个在 2007 年或 2008 年仅需 22.5 万美元的数字，在如今已经飙升至 45 万美元——在短短不到二十年内就翻了一倍。伴随着人工智能（AI）可能抢走大量基础岗位的焦虑，新一代年轻人陷入了迷茫，更不用说身上背负着沉重的学生贷款负担。 - **财富代际固化**：老年群体更关注守住养老金与退休资产，不愿将资本重新投入创业，阻断了代际财富传承链条。 - **生活成本剧增**：通胀导致物价与住房成本失控，仅约 15 至 20 年间部分核心开支就翻了一倍，青年群体的经济压力骤增。 --- ### [01:12:46](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=4366s) 英美学生债务陷阱与公立服务神话当罗根提到英国拥有“免费大学教育”时，洛立刻纠正了这一误解：在英国，只有苏格兰目前保留了高等教育免学费政策，英格兰早就不再实行免费大学教育。洛提到自己的长子已经 35 岁，当年读大学时就背负了学生贷款，而现在的大学学费更是水涨船高。罗根惊讶地追问，因为他一直以为英国既有全民免费医疗也有免费大学教育。洛解释道，英国国民医疗服务体系（NHS）虽然战后初衷是提供免费医疗，但如今由于效率极其低下，病人想看全科医生（GP）或排期手术耗时极长，很多人不得不自掏腰包寻求私人医疗服务。谈到大学负债，洛指出在英国大学生毕业时欠下 6 万英镑（£60,000）的债务已是司空见惯，而且贷款被施加了极为苛刻的高额利息。这笔债务虽然有 30 年有效期的限制，一旦开始工作就会从薪资中强制扣除本息，但在英国并不至于因此被宣告破产。罗根随即对比了美国的残酷现实：在美国，申请个人破产可以免除信用卡债务等各种常规借款，但唯独学生贷款是绝对无法豁免的无底洞。甚至许多到了风烛残年、只能依靠社保养老金（Social Security）度日的老人，其养老金每个月仍会被政府强行划扣以偿还当年的学生贷款。 - **苏格兰与英格兰政策差异**：苏格兰本土学生免学费，而英格兰高校学生需自负高昂学费，平均债务规模可达 6 万英镑。 - **美国助学贷款制度的残酷性**：助学贷款不可通过破产程序免除，逾期甚至会导致联邦政府直接克扣借款人晚年的社保金。 --- ### [01:15:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=4505s) 大学意识形态俘获与“无用学位” 洛尖锐地批评了当今大学开设的大量所谓人文学科课程，认为这些专业内容空洞荒谬，年轻人毕业后不仅背负巨债，而且缺乏任何能在市场上立足的实际硬技能。罗根对此深表认同，指出这些缺乏实用技能的毕业生往往被灌输了一整套受意识形态控制的思维。当今高校普遍极度偏左，即便是出身于保守或传统家庭的孩子，步入大学校园后也极易受到影响。罗根生动地描绘了这种校园生态：讲台上充斥着一生从未从事过一份体面正经工作的大学教授，他们自鸣得意、傲慢自大，掌控着课堂的生杀大权，对任何持反对意见的学生嗤之以鼻。天真年轻的学生们如群氓般盲从，自以为加入了“拯救世界”的正义阵营，在校园里热衷于政治集会，直到 35 岁左右步入社会、承担家庭责任后，才猛然醒悟当年的荒谬。两人随后讨论起一句广泛流传的经典名言——“年轻人如果不是自由主义者，就是没有心肝；老年人如果不是保守主义者，就是没有头脑”，并将其归于温斯顿·丘吉尔（Winston Churchill）的名下。 --- ### [01:16:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=4617s) 苦难造就性格：告别受害者心态与借口文化罗根进一步阐述，走向保守主义并非意味着冷酷无情，而是对客观“人性”的深刻认知。他指出，社会绝不能鼓励“不付出努力”或“将自己打扮成受害者”，因为一旦将受害者身份武器化并给予物质补偿，人们就会蜂拥而至争当借口大师。任何从事过竞技运动的人都深知人性好逸恶劳的劣根性——今天背痛、明天太累、后天不想跑最后一圈，只要社会把借口合理化，人们就会把手伸进公共纳税人的钱包里肆意索取。洛对此深有感触，回忆起自己成长时期的价值观：在那个年代，竞争被视为好事，哪怕身体有些不舒服或者遭受了打击，也没有人会怨天尤人或“冲着啤酒哭泣”，大家都会咬紧牙关继续拼搏。罗根强调，人生中的低谷和艰难日子恰恰是塑造性格、催生动力的最佳催化剂；正是那些身处逆境的时刻，赋予了人彻底摆脱泥潭、实现飞跃的“真正火力”——因为伟大的成就与坚韧的品格，无一不是从逆境中磨砺出来的。 ### [01:18:48](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=4728s) 疫情封锁对年轻人的冲击与国家权力的扩张对话从逆境塑造性格的话题自然延伸到了新冠疫情对社会的深远影响。鲁珀特·洛（Rupert Lowe）谈到，疫情期间的政府应对措施对年轻一代造成了极大的摧残。洛自嘲自己是个“纯血统”（pure blood），即从未接种过任何新冠疫苗，碰都不肯碰一下。乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）好奇在政策严苛的英国他是如何做到的。洛解释说，他在西澳大利亚的珀斯（Perth）有一些商业投资，平日里特别热爱西澳那些充满粗犷狂野气息的矿区古老岩石，比如像卡尔古利（Kalgoorlie）这种拥有浓厚淘金历史的地方。由于当时国际旅行限制重重、寸步难行，他索性直接停止了跨国出行。在洛看来，整个封锁政策令人感到极为不安和费解，原本被视作理所当然的生活常态和常识仿佛一夜之间全盘瓦解。在英国，发生了一些他做梦也想不到会出现的荒唐事——国家权力几乎全盘接管了一切，通过恐吓与散播恐惧强迫民众顺从。受害最深的正是年轻人，他们失去了面对面社交、碰撞思想、辩论探索真相的宝贵机会，整个人生被彻底关进由屏幕构成的禁闭之中。罗根对此感同身受并指出，以美国加利福尼亚州为例，很多高中生整个高三学年都是被锁在家里度过的，甚至在毕业时连毕业典礼都被以“过于危险”为由强行取消，整场应对简直就是彻头彻尾的疯狂。相比之下，洛提到了当时瑞典的国家首席流行病学家安德斯·特格内尔（Anders Tegnell），称赞他是一个顶住外界巨大阻力、极其勇敢并且做出了正确选择的伟大人物。 - **未接种疫苗的代价**：洛为了拒绝接种疫苗，被迫放弃前往西澳矿区（如卡尔古利）打理生意的跨国旅行。 - **青少年的社交剥夺**：学校关闭、线上教学与取消毕业典礼，阻断了年轻一代通过现实交流碰撞思想、建立人际连接的成长过程。 - **瑞典的抗疫例外**：两人特别称赞了瑞典及其前国家流行病学家安德斯·特格内尔，认为其坚持不进行激进全面封锁的做法经受住了历史检验。 --- ### [01:20:41](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=4841s) 全民检举风潮、极端防疫规范与对体制信任的崩溃随着社会恐慌的蔓延，公众不仅默默顺从政府指令，甚至主动充当起了官方规训的“编外执法者”。罗根震惊于社会中竟有如此多的人甘愿沦为盲从的“旅鼠”（lemmings），为了极端的行政命令互相举报。在洛杉矶，市政府甚至设立了经济奖励，鼓励居民告发邻里间举行的聚会。洛表示英国同样充斥着告密之风，他在荒僻的乡间私人领地建有一处隐秘的网球场，当时便邀请朋友过来打球，因为在空旷的户外禁止打网球简直荒唐透顶；由于该球场隐蔽，外人看不见才得以幸免，而如果有人在村子里的公共球场打球，邻里间立刻就会相互揭发。罗根回忆起加州工作室经历的荒诞遭遇：有周围的人专门盯着进出工作室的访客，看到有人握手便立刻向有关部门举报，甚至有人检举节目的录制桌宽度只有 5 英尺，达不到规定的 6 英尺社交距离。为此，工作室不得不被迫在正门贴上警示告示、备好整包整包的口罩，甚至还要按规定摆放洗手液。这种苛刻而荒谬的微观管制，从根本上摧毁了公众对权威与专家的信任。罗根感慨道，过去许多人天真地以为公共卫生专家是在一心一意维护公众健康，直到后来才看清背后的真相——他们是在极力维系庞大医药利益集团的垄断利润。为了强行推销产品并榨取利润，体制不惜剥夺普通人乘坐飞机、自驾出行、上学和工作的权利，甚至要求百人以上企业强制全员接种。尽管这一套铁腕手段在短期内成功迫使公众屈服，但年轻一代对体制和所谓“专家”的崇拜与信任已经彻底灰飞烟灭。 - **民间告密与经济赏罚**：洛杉矶曾通过金钱奖励鼓励邻里告密；英国乡村地区同样出现针对户外散步、运动的严厉检举。 - **播客工作室的违规“红线”**：罗根的录像桌因宽度仅 5 英尺（不足 6 英尺社交隔离标准）及握手等举动遭到举报，被迫张贴合规告示并配备口罩物资。 - **权威神话的破灭**：强制命令与药企利益深度绑定，使公众对公共卫生机构的专业操守和公信力产生了不可逆的怀疑。 --- ### [01:23:04](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=4984s) 疫苗强制令、不良反应与伊维菌素争议洛谈到，英国国民医疗服务体系（NHS）此前甚至强制要求医护人员必须接种疫苗，然而事实证明疫苗既无法有效切断传播，更引发了严重的后遗症。他身边许多平时体魄强健的朋友在接种后陆续患上心肌炎、中风或心脏病发作，洛坚信这些健康后果至今远未完结。罗根附和道，现实中几乎每个人身边都有遭遇严重不良反应的熟人，那些声称从未听说过副作用的人不是极其罕见的幸运儿，就是在公然撒谎——因为他们最初曾狂热支持过疫苗政策，如今不愿承认自己站错了队。不仅如此，两人都因为拒绝接种而被昔日的朋友扣上“危害家中老人健康”的帽子，从而痛失好友。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 紧急使用授权逻辑与早期替代治疗排挤机制 accDescr: 展示FDA紧急使用授权前提下廉价替代药物如伊维菌素遭受打压的逻辑链条 subgraph Regulation ["监管与审批门槛"] EUA["紧急使用授权 (EUA) 前提条件：市场上不存在 有效替代治疗方案"] end subgraph CheapDrugs ["廉价仿制药与早期干预"] IVM["伊维菌素 / 维生素等替代疗法 （廉价无专利、具抗病毒特性）"] India["印度等国广泛应用 并取得显著防治效果"] end subgraph MediaPushback ["舆论打压与利益绑定"] Media["主流媒体与药企合谋 （如 CNN 贴上'马药'标签并调色抹黑）"] Compliance["剥夺替代方案合法性 确保疫苗独占市场与暴利"] end IVM --> India IVM -.冲突.-> EUA EUA --> Compliance Media --> Compliance ``` 洛随后指出，像印度这样的国家大规模使用了伊维菌素（Ivermectin），取得了相当显著的成效。作为农场主的洛坦言，自己过去一直用伊维菌素给牛群驱虫，但这确实是一种行之有效的药物。罗根随即分享了自己在美国因伊维菌素遭到 CNN 连番“抹黑追杀”的离奇遭遇。当时罗根染上新冠后不得不取消原定与戴夫·查普尔（Dave Chappelle）在纳什维尔的巡演，他在说明视频中提到自己的私人医生采取了“倾尽所有”（kitchen sink）的综合方案，使用了单克隆抗体、阿奇霉素（Z-Pak）、静脉注射维生素以及伊维菌素，仅仅三天便彻底康复。然而，CNN 等主流媒体连续数天炮轰他服用“马用驱虫药”，甚至在播放他发布的视频时恶意调整画面色调，将他的肤色调成惨绿发灰的病态颜色。罗根澄清道，伊维菌素曾因治疗盘尾丝虫病（河盲症）等人类寄生虫疾病荣膺诺贝尔奖，并已被证实具有广谱抗病毒特性，对登革热等疾病也有研究探索。之所以遭受如此歇斯底里的围剿，核心在于它是没有专利壁垒的廉价仿制药，单片成本不过一美元左右；而在美国的法规框架下，只要存在被正式认可的替代治疗方案，耗资巨大的新型疫苗就无法合法获取“紧急使用授权”（EUA）。罗根三天康复的事实戳破了官方的神话，因而招致了媒体与体制的疯狂报复。 - **社交关系割裂**：洛与罗根均因未打疫苗遭遇人际孤立与“道德绑架”，甚至失去多年挚友。 - **CNN 恶意调色抹黑事件**：罗根公开综合疗程（包含单抗、阿奇霉素、维生素及伊维菌素）并在 3 天内痊愈后，CNN 将其斥为吃“兽用马药”，并在转播中恶意调整视频滤镜使罗根面色发绿。 - **紧急使用授权（EUA）与经济驱动**：美国法律规定，获得 EUA 的前提是无有效现存治疗手段；廉价非专利药（单片约 1 美元）被承认疗效将直接威胁药企获得千亿美元级市场准入的法律基础。 ### [01:27:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=5220s) 舆论围剿、尼尔·杨撤歌风波与替代疗法争议乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）回忆起自己感染新冠康复后公开发声时遭遇的猛烈舆论围剿。他指出，当时主流舆论发动了一场协调一致的运动试图彻底毁掉他。摇滚老将尼尔·杨（Neil Young）甚至以罗根“散布疫苗虚假信息”为由，愤而将自己的音乐从 Spotify 平台全线下架。罗根表示，尼尔·杨可能真心以为自己在做正确的事，但他其实“根本不知道自己在胡扯什么”，不过是一个整天只看电视新闻的典型老一辈婴儿潮一代（Boomer）。罗根坦言自己至今仍然喜爱尼尔·杨的音乐，还分享了一段往事：自己 19 岁时曾在一场尼尔·杨演唱会上做安保工作，结果现场爆发骚乱，那是他那份工作的最后一天。罗根强调，盲目撤歌实际上是在为庞大的宣传机器站台，这套体制向公众撒谎，声称打疫苗是唯一的出路，却彻底无视印度的北方邦（Uttar Pradesh）等地通过大范围推广伊维菌素（Ivermectin）成功将新冠死亡率压至极低水平的客观事实。鲁珀特·洛威（Rupert Lowe）对此表示赞同，并指出官方深知疫苗造成的损害，只是碍于面子与责任“目前绝不可能承认”。罗根补充说，那些曾在电视上极力兜售官方叙事的人至今仍在死撑和粉饰，即便在公开辩论中颜面扫地——例如前 CNN 主持人克里斯·科莫（Chris Cuomo）在与戴夫·史密斯（Dave Smith）的正面辩论中就被驳得体无完肤。洛威接着感慨，这就像在自来水里加氟、在面包里强加叶酸一样，整套体制已经陷入了“瘾君子自产自嗨（getting high on his own supply）”的荒诞境地。 - 尼尔·杨抗议罗根播客内容并从 Spotify 下架其全部音乐版权。 - 罗根 19 岁时曾在尼尔·杨演唱会工作，因现场发生暴乱而结束了那份差事。 - 罗根提及印度北方邦通过伊维菌素取得显著抗疫成效的真实案例。 - 戴夫·史密斯与克里斯·科莫就疫情政策与言论展开辩论，后者被指全盘否认自己当年的激进言辞。 --- ### [01:28:39](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=5319s) 药企广告游说垄断与身边的健康异常罗根分析指出，医疗与舆论管制的底层逻辑本质上是一门暴利生意。在美国，庞大的游说集团只想维持既有的敛财模式，其中最核心的支柱便是各大电视台的商业广告赞助。在全世界范围内，仅有美国和新西兰允许制药公司在电视上公开投放处方药广告。这笔庞大的广告预算事实上买断了新闻媒体的监督权，导致主流电视网络彻底噤声，绝口不提任何不良反应——新闻里看不到心脏病发作、中风或心肌炎的深度报道。罗根指出，如果这些药企没有赞助媒体，一旦有人靠致人死命的产品牟取暴利，媒体本该大肆曝光；但如今，媒体为了广告费选择对人尽皆知的事实视而不见，彻底毁掉了自身的公信力。洛威认为媒体不仅仅是视而不见，而是完全心知肚明却不敢承认。罗根直言，现实中每个人身边绝对都有因接种疫苗而落下毛病的朋友，不是中风就是神经系统受损，他自己就认识两个打完后装了心脏起搏器的人；如果有人声称身边一个出事的人都没有，那纯粹是在撒谎。洛威对此深有同感，并列举了身边的遭遇：他的嫂子患上了心肌炎，而他最要好的朋友在接种疫苗仅仅一周后就突发中风，还有很多人出现了心律失常和血液方面的异常问题。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 药企广告与媒体噤声机制 accDescr: 展示制药公司通过高额广告预算控制主流新闻媒体并压制副作用报道的运作流程。 subgraph 资本流动与利益绑定 A["制药公司 (高额广告预算)"] -->|"巨额赞助投入"| B["主流电视新闻媒体 (依赖广告收入存活)"] end subgraph 舆论控制与后果 B -->|"自我审查与视而不见"| C["全面封锁负面报道 (中风 / 心肌炎 / 异常死亡)"] C -->|"单向灌输官方叙事"| D["公众被蒙蔽与受害 (媒体丧失社会公信力)"] end ``` - 全球仅美国与新西兰两国合法允许制药企业在公共电视媒体投放处方药广告。 - 洛威的嫂子在接种后患上心肌炎，其挚友在打针一周后突发严重中风。 - 两人指出身边普遍出现突发中风、心律失常、血液病变及安装心脏起搏器的异常病例。 --- ### [01:30:34](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=5434s) 行为诱导团队、加州严苛封控与政界腐败洛威进一步揭露了英国政府在疫情期间设立的“行为诱导团队”（Nudge Team，即行为洞察团队）。他认为官方动用极度精密的心理学手段操纵大众思想、诱导全民乖乖接受封锁隔离，这种做法令人作呕，性质恶劣程度堪比他当年在足球界时遭遇的手机窃听丑闻。罗根回应称，美国各地的封控力度因城市而异，而加利福尼亚州尤为灾难：政府下令关闭了所有脱口秀喜剧俱乐部，洛杉矶更是有 70% 的餐馆因封控而倒闭破产。罗根调侃道，加州之所以还有人忍受，纯粹是因为老天爷赏饭吃的自然气候与风光，如果加州拥有西雅图那样的阴雨天气，人口早就跑光了；如今的加州体制内充斥着“披着羊皮的狼”，一帮伪装成社会主义者的政治骗子靠着公职大肆敛财，身家与法定薪资严重脱节，背后尽是肮脏的犯罪。两人随后谈及加州州长加文·纽森（Gavin Newsom）身边的最新丑闻：联邦调查局（FBI）成功策反了纽森核心圈子的一名亲信女官员，让她秘密佩戴窃听器卧底调查长达一年多。罗根强调，这项调查早在 2024 年拜登执政期间就已经启动，能让联邦调查局在纽森核心圈子里布线窃听，说明背后必然牵扯着极其严重的实质性黑幕。 - 英国政府设立行为诱导团队（Nudge Unit），通过系统性心理操控迫使公众顺从封锁政策。 - 严苛封控导致洛杉矶市约 70% 的餐饮企业倒闭。 - 联邦调查局在纽森身边的一位核心盟友身上安装窃听器，秘密收集加州政府内部证据长达一年以上。 --- ### [01:33:16](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=5596s) 无家可归产业、合规/DEI 陷阱与非政府组织暴利罗根与洛威将批判锋芒转向了以善意为名、行敛财之实的庞大社会官僚体系。罗根指出，加州政府耗费了高达 240 亿美元的财政税收来解决无家可归问题，结果流浪汉危机反而愈演愈烈。原因在于流浪汉救助已经彻底演变成了一门暴利的“流浪汉产业”（Homeless Industry），救助委员会的负责人拿着数十万美元的年薪，根本没有动力去真正解决问题。洛威深表赞同，并指出英国同样存在类似现象：所谓的企业合规（Compliance）以及多样性、平等与包容（DEI）已经催生出了一个吸血的成熟产业。这些机构打着“包容”的旗号，实则在摧毁个人责任感，向全社会灌输有害的虚无哲学，同时让从业高管赚得盆满钵满。两人最后谈到了非政府组织（NGO）与政府资助项目的全球腐败网络。罗根提到了研究员迈克·本茨（Mike Benz）对美国国际开发署（USAID）等机构的深度调查与揭露。洛威赞叹那些揭露材料涉及的资金欺诈与浪费规模令人瞠目结舌。更严重的是，这种腐败模式正被源源不断地输出到全世界，尤其是英国。洛威举例提到，英国著名政客兼主持人罗里·斯图尔特（Rory Stewart）的妻子所运营的项目就曾接受过此类资金的资助，直至该项目最终被叫停关闭。 - 加州在应对无家可归问题上累计耗资达 240 亿美元，但危机反而持续恶化。 - 无家可归救助组织与 DEI 机构高管年薪高达数十万美元，形成自我维持的既得利益集团。 - 迈克·本茨深入揭露了包括 USAID 在内的非营利网络在全球范围内输送利益、煽动意识形态及涉嫌重大资金欺诈的黑幕。 - 英国政客罗里·斯图尔特之妻的相关机构曾卷入此类涉外资金资助链条，随后该业务被关停。 ### [01:35:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=5708s) 移民政治、福利铁票仓与纳税人困境乔·罗根与鲁珀特·洛探讨了美国边境政策的底层逻辑与长远政治图谋。罗根指出，尽管目前的边境非法越境在某种程度上被遏制，但倘若2028年民主党人再次当选总统，边境阀门势必会重新彻底打开，一切又将回到“照常营业”的旧模式。在罗根看来，这种政策并非出于单纯的善意，而是有着极具破坏性的政治算计：将大批移民输送到蓝州，用纳税人的钱为他们提供社会援助和各项福利，进而推动他们入籍成为选民。一旦这批依赖救济的人获得投票权，他们必然会为了维持现有的福利生活而投票给民主党，从而形成永久性的铁票仓，彻底垄断总统选举。罗根强调，这正是埃隆·马斯克（Elon Musk）所洞察到的战略，而且马斯克对美国国际开发署（USAID）以及各类非政府组织（NGO）在其中扮演的角色有着深入的了解，这种有预谋的协同操作令人不寒而栗。鲁珀特·洛对这一观察表示高度认同，并指出这本质上是对纳税人血汗钱的极度缺乏尊重，而这正是英国目前所经历的灾难性现状。英国的公共资金长期遭到滥用，他感叹美国至少还在尝试恢复某种常态，而英国目前迫切需要摆脱这种深渊。 - 政治利益链机制：通过引入移民 -> 蓝州安置 -> 提供福利救济 -> 推进快速入籍 -> 巩固长期总统大选选票。 - 罗根指出马斯克的洞察揭示了大量非政府组织（NGO）和官方援助机构协同推进该议程的深度。 ```mermaid flowchart LR accTitle: 移民政治转化机制 accDescr: 展示罗根与马斯克指出的移民、福利与选民转化的闭环逻辑 subgraph Strategy["移民安置与福利输送"] A["边境宽松政策"] --> B["非政府组织与援助机构安置"] B --> C["注入蓝州并提供社会救济"] end subgraph Result["政治固化与选举锁定"] C --> D["推进快速入籍程序"] D --> E["形成福利依赖型铁票仓"] E --> F["长期垄断国家选举结果"] end ``` --- ### [01:36:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=5775s) 伊朗战云、现实政治与马斯克捍卫言论自由话题随即转向国际局势与英国的外交防务。罗根提到，美国眼下可能因为卷入针对伊朗的战争而自毁前程。他强调，任何理智的保守派都不希望爆发战争，除了部分以色列的支持者外，绝大多数美国人都对此感到惊恐，因为唐纳德·特朗普当初当选的核心立足点之一正是承诺“不再发动新的对外战争”。鲁珀特·洛表示，他从“现实政治”（Realpolitik）的角度明确反对卷入该冲突，因为介入伊朗根本不符合英国的国家利益。洛指出，国家领导人唯一的责任是将本国纳税人的利益置于首位，“只有当战争能带来切实的国家利益时，才有出兵的理由”。尽管洛承认伊朗政权具有危害性，其扶植的真主党（Hezbollah）与哈马斯（Hamas）在黎巴嫩和加沙制造混乱，但英国目前根本没有介入的资本。他略带自嘲地透露，英国此前派出一艘军舰前去协助维安，结果军舰甚至“无法正常运转”；由于国家把几乎所有财政预算都挥霍在了福利开支上，导致国防建设极度萎缩，英国在军事上早已力不从心。谈及公共舆论时，洛对埃隆·马斯克力挽狂澜捍卫言论自由给予了极高评价。他批评基尔·斯塔默（Keir Starmer）以及费边社（Fabian Society）与霍尔丹社会主义法律人协会（Haldane Society）等左派建制势力，称其推行着一套扼杀思想的恶毒哲学。马斯克在社交平台恢复言论自由，阻止了这套体制彻底压垮渴望公开辩论与寻求真相的民众。然而罗根指出，英国当局已经通过肆无忌惮地抓捕言论发表者，在整个社会制造了恐慌，迫使普通人因害怕惹上官司而选择闭嘴。 - 洛的现实政治原则：国家领导人的首要职责是维护本国纳税人利益，绝不应参与对本国无益的海外冲突。 - 英国军事尴尬现状：皇家海军派遣军舰执行海外任务时遭遇机械故障无法正常运转，暴露出“重福利、轻国防”带来的防御空洞。 - 言论管控的寒蝉效应：当局通过对网络言论执行逮捕，对公众形成了强大的封口威慑。 --- ### [01:38:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=5901s) “双轨制执法”、卢顿丑闻与被掩盖的真相针对英国的言论审查与社会分裂，鲁珀特·洛直接指斥这是典型的“双轨制警务”（Two-tier policing）。他指出，亲巴勒斯坦的大规模游行在街头屡屡受到纵容，但任何带有右翼色彩的集会，尤其是与汤米·罗宾逊（Tommy Robinson）相关的游行，都会遭到建制派的残酷压制。虽然罗宾逊在英国建制精英眼中臭名昭著，但洛公开肯定了罗宾逊在揭露儿童诱拐虐待团伙（grooming gangs）方面的历史贡献。早在2003年，罗宾逊就在卢顿（Luton）率先对这类有组织的虐童团伙敲响了警钟。罗根回忆道，早在2003或2004年自己初次听说此事时，主流媒体和建制派都一致把罗宾逊定性为令人不齿的“极右翼极端分子”，宣称他编造了所谓的外来移民强奸团伙的谎言，导致外界根本分不清真相。洛直言不讳地指出，事实证明罗宾逊从一开始就是正确的。建制派之所以极力掩盖并拒不承认，是因为他们心知肚明，一旦承认这些丑闻，就等于承认他们二战后强推的“多元文化实验彻底失败”。他愤怒地表示，任何社会都绝不能容忍最弱势的群体遭到外来者的系统性虐待，法律面前必须人人平等：“强奸就是强奸，不管罪犯来自穆斯林国家还是基督教国家，罪行就是罪行，必须受到同等严厉的惩处。” 面对罗根询问如何彻底铲除此类罪行，洛表示核心在于让法律回归常轨并严格执法。他剖析了英国执法体系瘫痪的制度根源：几十年来，警方在体制内被灌输了“警察天生存在种族主义”的负罪感。这一切很大程度上源于20世纪90年代末伦敦黑人青年斯蒂芬·劳伦斯（Stephen Lawrence）被刺杀的种族仇恨案件。洛指出，虽然劳伦斯遇害案本身令人发指，但随后的司法与社会反应走火入魔，让警察队伍陷入了极度害怕被扣上“种族主义”帽子的病态心理。结果演变成当今的荒诞局面：任何涉及白人加害者的种族案件都被无限放大，而针对“本土白人”（Indigenous white people）的恶性犯罪却被官方竭力压制和掩盖。罗根听到“本土白人”这个词时忍俊不禁，调侃称这在习惯于多元移民的美国极为罕见，甚至戏谑“怪不得英国人都这么面色苍白”；洛则严肃回应，英格兰人确实拥有属于自己的本土族群认同，英国向来对需要庇护的人慷慨包容，但前提必须是尊重本土文化、融入社会并作出贡献，而不是在拒绝融入的同时将当地人视为“异教徒”。 - 诱拐团伙的历史验证：汤米·罗宾逊早在2003年在卢顿发出的警告最终被司法调查证实，但建制派初期为维护多元文化叙事对其进行了长达数年的污名化封杀。 - 斯蒂芬·劳伦斯（Stephen Lawrence）案后遗症：该种族谋杀案彻底重塑了英国警务考核标准，导致警方因过度恐惧被指控“种族主义”而在少数族裔涉案时选择消极执法。 - 司法平等底线：强奸犯罪不应受任何宗教背景、族裔身份的特殊保护，必须统一严格执行国家法度。 --- ### [01:41:33](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=6093s) 废除布莱尔立法遗产与夺回议会主权罗根指出，用纳税人的钱去激励非法移民涌入自己的国家简直是“纯粹的疯狂”，不仅会迅速耗尽财政资源，更毫无道理地将沉重负担转嫁到本国纳税人身上。鲁珀特·洛对此表示完全支持，并详细介绍了其团队起草的移民政策文件。洛提出必须建立一套“敌对环境”（Hostile environment）：国家坚决停止向非法滞留者发放任何福利，杜绝一切吸引非法移民入境的诱因，并促使那些拒绝工作贡献、甚至公开鄙视英国法律与文化并将当地人称为“异教徒”的人彻底离开，遣返回自己的母国。当罗根追问英国现行法律是否具备驱逐这些人的法定权限时，洛直言目前的法律框架已被严重捆绑。正因如此，他的政党和政治力量必须全力以赴，力争在2029年大选中赢得议会绝对多数。只有掌控议会，才能通过自上而下的立法程序，彻底废除阻碍国家行使主权的陈规旧律。洛将当前困境的源头直接指向托尼·布莱尔（Tony Blair）及其追随者：正是布莱尔政府当年通过了一整套向非国民提供医疗服务、牙科诊疗、社会福利和免费住房的法律，其深层目的正是为了扫清法律障碍、强推大规模移民。洛讽刺布莱尔是个极其狡诈的“老狐狸”，近期甚至开始公开试图与自己当年亲手打造的恶果撇清关系。洛挖苦道，如今的布莱尔满头银发、目光锐利，“看起来简直就像现代版的别西卜（Beelzebub，恶魔）”，让人一眼望去便联想到邪恶。他重申，英国作为一个崇尚法治的国家，改变现状的唯一合法途径就是掌控议会，自上而下废止布莱尔时期的特权法律，同时全力争夺各地地方政府的控制权，从而全面重构并赋权民族国家。 - 移民“敌对环境”政策：全面切断免费医疗、牙科服务、福利救济与政府安置房，阻断经济拉力。 - 2029年大选目标：必须赢得议会绝对多数，以行使立法权废除托尼·布莱尔时期遗留的大规模移民法律保障。 - 双层治理反攻：不仅需要在威斯敏斯特顶层废立法律，还必须夺回被左翼思潮渗透的地方政府管辖权。 ### [01:43:47](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=6227s) 地方政府与性侵团伙调查：自下而上的政治改革对英国性侵团伙（rape gangs）调查的追责不仅涉及中央层面的失职，各级地方政府同样难辞其咎。针对乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）关于地方官员是否故意装聋作哑、否认事实甚至对公众进行心理诱导（gaslighting）的质问，鲁珀特·洛（Rupert Lowe）直接将矛头对准工党，直言工党在中央和地方两级都纵容并助长了这一现象。他表示，在阅读过调查报告后，完全无法理解为何还会有人把选票投给工党，因为这些令人发指的侵害事件绝大多数都发生在工党主政的地区。地方政客对事实全盘否认，而现实中却有像萨米·伍德豪斯（Sammy Woodhouse）这样惨遭侵害、甚至被迫为强奸犯生下孩子的受害者。洛认为，要扭转这种局面，必须自下而上重构地方治理，而他们已经在付诸实践——例如在诺福克郡（Norfolk）的地方选举中包揽了全部9个郡议会席位。作为英格兰东海岸大雅茅斯（Great Yarmouth）选区的议员，他痛斥战后精英对沿海地区的背叛，特别是英国渔民在加入欧盟期间被彻底出卖，将宝贵的捕鱼权拱手让给欧洲同行。洛谈到自己对诺福克肥沃土地的热爱，称务农是自己最大的爱好。他强调，真正的变革路径必须是“自下而上控制地方政府，再由上至下重塑国家政权”，只有这样才能彻底释放英国人民长期被压抑的精气神。 - 工党被指在全国和地方双重层面否认并纵容性侵团伙犯罪，相关丑闻普遍爆发于工党执政的核心行政区。 - 受害者萨米·伍德豪斯（Sammy Woodhouse）的悲惨遭遇被作为体制性漠视与掩盖的典型证据。 - 改革派在诺福克郡议会选举中大获全胜，赢下全部 9 个参选席位。 - 战后英国政治精英因欧盟配额协议牺牲本土渔民利益，导致沿海选区深陷长期衰退。 --- ### [01:45:37](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=6337s) 制度腐败与布莱尔时期的“准官方机构”（Quango）面对罗根关于制度惯性必然带来巨大阻力的担忧，洛直言不讳地指出，英国如今仿佛被“有组织犯罪集团”所挟持——腐败的司法机构、失职走偏的警察队伍、瘫痪的地方行政、被异化为国家垄断工具的国民医疗服务体系（NHS），以及方向走偏的教育体制，都是这场变革必须面对的顽疾。但他坚信民众的变革意愿极为强烈，最典型的例证就是 2016 年脱欧公投：当时戴维·卡梅伦（David Cameron）政府动用公权力向全英每家每户发放官方宣传信，极力主张留欧，但民众依然坚决投票选择离开。洛分析道，人民脱欧并非单纯出于经济利益考量，而是为了夺回国家主权，让威斯敏斯特议会重新成为对选民负责的权力中枢。英国当前的制度溃败在很大程度上源于托尼·布莱尔（Tony Blair）执政时期的宪制改革。传统上，英国议会拥有绝对主权，由民选代表组成的下议院应当处于权力金字塔的顶端；然而布莱尔政府设立了数百个被称为“Quango”（准自治非政府机构，quasi-autonomous non-governmental organizations）的机构，包括创立独立的英国最高法院以及大律师标准委员会（Bar Standards Board）等。这些机构雇用了大批未经选举产生的技术官僚，逐渐演变成不受监督的独立王国，侵蚀了议会的实权。两党体制下的保守党与工党互相效仿，布莱尔将国家引向左倾，卡梅伦则全盘模仿布莱尔路线，导致真正的保守主义思潮长期缺位。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 英国宪制权力转移与 Quango 架构示意图 accDescr: 展示英国权力中心从传统民选议会向非民选官僚机构（Quango）分散的过程 subgraph Traditional["传统宪制架构（议会至上）"] Voters["英国选民"] --> Parliament["威斯敏斯特议会（民选代表 / 绝对权力）"] end subgraph BlairReform["布莱尔宪制改革后"] Parliament -.-> SupremeCourt["英国最高法院（独立司法）"] Parliament -.-> Quangos["各类 Quango 官僚机构 （如大律师标准委员会、ICGS等）"] Quangos --> PolicyExec["非民选技术官僚掌控决策与审查"] end classDef blue fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1565c0,stroke-width:2px; classDef red fill:#ffebee,stroke:#c62828,stroke-width:2px; class Voters,Parliament blue; class SupremeCourt,Quangos,PolicyExec red; ``` --- ### [01:48:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=6494s) 盎格鲁-撒克逊世界的联结与美国独立日的玩笑在谈到外部支持时，洛借着录制当天正值美国独立日前夕（7月3日）开起了历史玩笑，感叹当年英国放任北美殖民地独立是个“糟糕的失误”：“如果我们当年把牌打得更好一点，你们今天应该还是我们的一部分。”罗根随即幽默回击，称独立对美国人而言非常划算，对英国则不然，因为美国人可不想生活在当下英国严苛的法律管制之下。玩笑过后，洛严肃地强调了盎格鲁-撒克逊世界（Anglo-Saxon world）团结互助的极端重要性。他批评当前西方世界过于碎片化，受到包括世界经济论坛（WEF）等跨国机构与意识形态的侵蚀，逐步瓦解了维系这一文明核心的凝聚力。他提醒道，正是这种同根同源的文明传统孕育了现代个体的自由权利，而个人自由具有极其脆弱的本质，稍有松懈便会在转瞬之间丧失殆尽。 --- ### [01:49:06](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=6546s) 政治腐败与抗药性细菌：必须彻底清洗体制乔·罗根深入剖析了美国社会的理想构想与现实危机。在健康的语境下，美国被视为任何背景的人都能追逐梦想的熔炉，强调团队合作与遵循规则，而非单一的种族认同；然而，现实中美国正被极端腐败的高层与只看重利润的巨型跨国公司所掌控。罗根尖锐指出，许多政客法定年薪只有 17 万美元，离任或在任时身价却能飙升至 4 亿美元，整个体制对此视若无睹，甚至没有一人因此被起诉入狱，这种司空见惯的罪恶竟然被当成“日常惯例”予以容忍。 ``` 常规行政腐败流程：企业资本利益注入 ──> 政治代理人敛财（身价暴涨） ──> 掩盖与法制豁免 ──> 变相为犯罪合法化 ``` 为了阐述彻底反腐的必要性，罗根打了一个生动的“抗生素耐药性”比喻： > 政治体制反腐就像服用抗生素消灭病菌，如果你没有服完整个疗程、斩草除根，只是半途而废地抵抗一下，剩下的腐败分子就会像变异的“耐药超级细菌”一样卷土重来。他们会吸取教训，摸清体制漏洞，随后变本加厉地推出更严苛的法令、封锁和管制，把整个国家彻底锁死。洛对此深表赞同，认为英国的境遇如出一辙。公职人员辜负选民的托付不仅是背叛，更是严重的犯罪。在英国，虽然财富总量不及美国庞大，但许多领取固定薪水、承担高额税负的官僚高层同样过着极度奢靡的生活，资金来源疑云重重，而追责机制却彻底失灵。 --- ### [01:51:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=6711s) 司法 Quango 与议会特权受到的侵蚀随着讨论重回英国体制的深层弊端，洛进一步抨击了英国司法系统的蜕变。现如今英国各级法官不再由议会传统程序考量选拔，而是被交给由所谓“觉醒文化”（woke）主导的独立 Quango 机构全权任命。司法机关表面上披着专业独立的外衣，实际上却脱离了民主问责机制，成为推行官僚意识形态的工具。洛结合自身在下议院的切身经历，阐述了议会至高权力正如何遭到外部官僚实体的蚕食。英国宪政史上确立了崇高的“议会特权”（parliamentary privilege），保障议员在下议院议事厅发言时免受诽谤诉讼的威胁，这本是议会言论自由的核心基石，允许议员毫无顾忌地揭露真相。然而，布莱尔体制下建立的“独立投诉与申诉机制”（ICGS，Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme）却被人为剥离于议会管辖之外，转由外部仲裁体系监管，进而形成了一张专门针对民选代表言行进行政治审查与立案调查的紧箍咒。这种设计直接颠覆了代议民主的立身之本，令民意代表在官僚机器面前寸步难行。 ### [01:52:38](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=6758s) 议会特权滥用与陪审团制度面临的危机鲁珀特·洛（Rupert Lowe）谈到自己此前试图通过法律途径维权时遭遇的荒唐经历。他抓住了某些机构的不当行径并打算将其告上法庭，对方却搬出“议会特权”（parliamentary privilege）作为挡箭牌，声称法庭无权管辖。令人匪夷所思的是，涉事场所并非议会辩论大厅，发言者并非国会议员，相关委员会没有任何议员任职，甚至无需向议会任何常设委员会汇报，但主审法官依然裁定其享有议会特权，彻底回避了实质问题。洛指出，这正是民选机构被架空、权力被官僚集团侵蚀的明证，当务之急是将权力真正还给人民选出的代表。与此同时，英国司法领域正在酝酿一项极其危险的举动：逐步取消许多案件的陪审团审判（jury trial）制度。乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）对此感到震惊，洛解释称，虽然政府一直试图推进该方案，但目前尚未彻底落实，工党内部仍有少数有良知的议员在坚决抵抗。洛直言，这种剥夺陪审团权利的行径本质上是“有组织犯罪”的体制化体现： > “因为如果你控制了法官，就能迫使越来越多的人走法官审判系统，而不是陪审团系统。” - **陪审团审判的削弱**：官方试图扩大单一法官裁量权，压缩由普通公民组成陪审团的传统法律保护网，使判决更容易受到司法体系内部政治倾向的操纵。 - **足球俱乐部时期的诽谤诉讼**：洛提到，当年他在管理英超南安普顿足球俱乐部期间，曾与鲁珀特·默多克（Rupert Murdoch）旗下的《泰晤士报》（The Times）打过一场旷日持久的诽谤官司（libel trial），并在此期间遭遇了报纸对其电话的大规模窃听。 --- ### [01:54:02](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=6842s) 小报电话窃听丑闻与建制派的腐败乔·罗根对英国媒体窃听电话的细节感到难以置信，询问究竟是如何操作的。洛解释说，当年很多人的手机语音信箱根本没有妥善加密，默认密码往往是四个零（“0000”）。如果不及时更改，小报记者就能轻而易举黑进语音信箱。在洛执掌足球俱乐部期间，他的语音留言几乎每天都在被小报记者偷听。更恶劣的是，记者会从他的语音信箱中提取来电者的电话号码并打上标记，转而开始窃听对方的手机。洛表示，虽然默多克在推动右翼媒体话语权方面有过贡献，但他绝不认同默多克旗下媒体搞非法电话窃听的无底线行径。这件事直观地反映出英国建制派（the establishment）早已彻底腐化堕落，而腐败必然催生系统性的压迫。洛认为，英国普通民众如今正处于一种极度压抑、焦躁乃至愤怒的沸腾状态（a febrile mood），如果他能代表变革力量站出来，公众或许会抓住机会赋予他们打破旧体制的权力。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 建制派腐败与权力异化逻辑 accDescr: 展示从监管失控、媒体与司法垄断到压迫民众的因果链条 subgraph Manipulation["权力失控与暗箱操作"] A["官僚与非民选机构 滥用议会特权脱罪"] B["小报非法窃听与 信息刺探泛滥"] end subgraph Judiciary["司法体系垄断"] C["试图剥夺陪审团权利 （Eliminate Jury Trials）"] D["由体制化法官 完全掌控审判结果"] end subgraph Outcome["社会后果"] E["言论空间收紧与司法压迫"] F["公众怒火积聚 社会陷入沸腾情绪"] end Manipulation --> Judiciary Judiciary --> Outcome ``` --- ### [01:55:39](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=6939s) 英国经济病症：膨胀的公共部门与费边主义陷阱面对罗根关于“当下英国民间真实情绪如何”的询问，洛深入剖析了英国经济与社会的根本结构性危机。他指出，目前掌权的是一群依靠错误意识形态大发横财的既得利益阶层，而真正创造财富的私营部门正变得越来越小，在 GDP 中的占比不断萎缩。洛估计，若算上形形色色的准自治非政府组织（Quangos，法定半官方机构）和直接/间接政府支出，英国国家机器在整个经济中的占比已经超过了 50%，远高于美国。而在撒切尔夫人执政乃至托尼·布莱尔上台之前的时期，英国经济基础雄厚，国家支出仅占经济总量的 30% 到 33% 左右。洛痛斥这是“费边社（Fabians）”长期渗透的结果，他们刻意制造一种苏联式的“依附文化”（dependency culture），由中央集权式地搜刮并分发纳税人的钱财。 - **私营部门被税收榨干**：政府以极端高额的税负压迫民营经济，导致大量创造财富的骨干力量（rainmakers）被迫出走海外。 - **资本与精英大流失**：英国最优秀的商业头脑和创业者纷纷外迁至意大利、迪拜、阿布扎比甚至美国；同时，取消“非英国居籍者”（Non-dom）税收优惠的蠢政彻底赶走了海外高净值投资者，让英国经济被严重掏空。 --- ### [01:57:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=7062s) 青年一代的觉醒、AI 冲击与告别中央计划谈及年轻人是否意识到体制的腐败与经济的衰退时，洛给出了相当积极的评价。他表示，英国年轻人的清醒程度令他刮目相看，许多年轻人正是他们坚定的支持者，因为年轻人亲身承受着恶果，清楚看到私营部门与公共部门的失衡已让未来变得暗淡。谈到人工智能（AI）对未来就业和年轻人的影响，洛坦承目前没人能预知其全貌。不同于以往工业革命让绝大多数普通人的生活水准普遍提升，AI 革命的进程极其迅猛，很可能只让极少数具备顶尖智力与资源的人获得惊人财富，而缺乏对应能力的人将陷入更加艰难的挣扎。但洛坚决强调，绝不能因为这种不确定性就倒退回国家中央计划的老路： > “这并不意味着我们需要一个由国家中央计划一切的体制。历史早就证明那根本行不通。中央计划带来的只能是对思想的封杀、对辩论的扼杀以及对言论自由的剥夺。” 洛坦言当前局势极为严峻，但他坚信如果能彻底释放英国人民内在的潜能与创造力，国家依然有救，但前提是必须“立刻采取行动”，否则一旦病入膏肓将再无回天之力。 --- ### [02:00:08](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=7208s) 英国政坛乱象：党内更迭闹剧与推迟大选的算计罗根对英国当前的社会状况感到难以理解——尤其是因为在社交媒体发帖就遭到警方逮捕，以及令人触目惊心的未成年少女强奸及性剥削团伙调查报告（grooming gang / rape gang report），这些在常人看来完全不可思议。罗根随即询问英国下一次全国大选将在何时举行。洛向罗根透露了英国政坛正在酝酿的戏剧性变化：基尔·斯塔默（Keir Starmer）据传即将辞去首相职务，而曼彻斯特市长、被洛戏称为“捉鬼敢死队”（Ghostbuster）的安迪·伯纳姆（Andy Burnham）已通过补选重返议会，并被内定为接任首相的热门人选。罗根听后深感荒谬：“斯塔默可以直接下台，指定另一个人接替他当首相？”洛感叹这种政治体制运转方式简直荒唐透顶。关于何时举行大选，洛分析认为： - **法定最后期限**：工党政府在法律层面上最晚可以一直拖到 2029 年才举行大选。 - **绝不会提前大选**：虽然外界传言新首相可能会发动闪电大选（snap election），但工党目前在下议院手握二战以来最庞大的绝对多数优势，任期还剩三年多，执政党没有任何理由冒失去政权的巨大风险提前解散议会。 - **伯纳姆的历史污点**：洛尖锐指出，安迪·伯纳姆本人的名字赫然出现在全国性侵犯罪团伙官方调查报告中，曼彻斯特正是强奸犯罪团伙肆虐的核心重灾区之一，而伯纳姆因在任内不作为、渎职失职遭到严肃点名。公众对工党的不满与愤怒正在积蓄，如果此时大选，民众必将对工党施以极其严厉的审判。 ### [02:01:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=7318s) 英国经济困境与公共账目委员会对国家浪费的质询鲁珀特·洛（Rupert Lowe）深入剖析了当下英国经济陷入的恶性循环。他指出，当前英国的整体经济表现极为糟糕，民众丝毫没有感到自己变富，反而在贫困中挣扎度日；各类中小企业步履维艰，而整体税率更是已经飙升至二战以来的历史新高。作为英国议会中极具权力的公共账目委员会（Public Accounts Committee, PAC）成员，鲁珀特直接参与面对面质询那些掌控庞大公共预算的资深公务员（Civil Servants）。他提到，这些质询会议全程公开并向公众直播，而他在委员会内部亲眼目睹的公共开支浪费程度“简直破了表、超乎想象”（off the scale）。在这种结构性困境下，一个臃肿、浪费且效率极其低下的国家机器，正在通过苛捐杂税将日益萎缩的私营部门“榨干殆尽”（taxing the private sector into oblivion）。鲁珀特痛陈，这种政策根本无法鼓励任何敢于承担风险的商业投资，反而是在摧毁英国的经济基石：政府破天荒地开始向世代传承的家庭农场和家族企业征收重税，直击英国社会的“脊梁”。在他看来，这背后隐藏着典型的费边社渐进主义议程（Fabian agenda），其终极目的就是建立一个所有人都极度依赖政府救济与国家管制的社会。鲁珀特坚决表示：“我绝对不想要那样的社会”，乔·罗根（Joe Rogan）也立刻赞同道：“任何正常人都不应该想要那种局面”。 - **战后税负顶点**：英国纳税人承受着第二次世界大战以来最沉重的税收负担，但公共服务与经济民生并未改善。 - **公共账目委员会（PAC）现场直击**：作为议会最有实权的常设委员会之一，PAC 负责审查政府账目并对公务员问责，然而官僚机构的资金浪费现象极其严重。 - **重创经济支柱**：历史上首次针对家庭农场与家族企业征收高额遗产税和相关税收，抑制了企业家的冒险精神与长远资本投入。 - **警惕费边社路线**：鲁珀特认为现行政策正在悄然推行费边主义议程，试图迫使民众和私营部门在生存上全面附庸于庞大的国家公权力。 ```mermaid flowchart TD accTitle: 英国当前财政与经济恶性循环示意图 accDescr: 展示了低效公共部门通过沉重税负扼杀私营部门并推动社会依附国家的过程 subgraph StateSector ["国家与官僚系统"] A["臃肿低效的政府机构"] --> B["超大规模公共资金浪费 (PAC质询揭露)"] end subgraph TaxationPressure ["战后最高税负"] B --> C["沉重税收转嫁"] C --> D["对家庭农场与家族企业征重税"] end subgraph PrivateErosion ["私营部门受挫与社会演变"] D --> E["私营经济规模持续萎缩 投资与冒险意愿归零"] E --> F["社会依赖国家救济 (费边主义社会形态)"] end ``` --- ### [02:03:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=7383s) 尾声：民心思变、政治承诺与节目录制告别随着谈话进入尾声，乔·罗根对鲁珀特·洛的到访表达了诚挚的感谢。他深知鲁珀特从英国远道而来并不容易，日程安排极为紧凑，而当天恰好是录播室仅有的可用档期。鲁珀特同样真诚地向罗根致谢，并顺带提及次日将迎来重大的节日庆祝活动。鲁珀特坦言，自己对当下所获得的民间支持力度感到既震惊又振奋。甚至在飞往美国的航班上，都有普通乘客主动走上前握手致意，感谢他敢于为公众利益发声，并明确表示会在接下来的选举中投票支持他。他深信英国的民心与政局“正在迎来转折点”（on the turn）。鲁珀特清晰地阐明了自己的从政准则：把纲领摆到明面上，清清楚楚地告诉老百姓自己将要做什么，把选择权完完全全交给选民；“如果他们投我，我将全力以赴逆转乾坤；如果他们不选我，那也是他们的自由和权利”。罗根赞许道：“这就是民主的真谛”（That's democracy）。在互道祝运与真诚的道别中，本期长篇对谈圆满落下帷幕。 ## Notable quotes > [00:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=1s) Britain's in bad shape — Rupert Lowe > [05:57](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=357s) cultural oil and water mix — Rupert Lowe > [12:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=732s) illegal means illegal — Rupert Lowe > [27:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=1678s) You will own nothing and you will be happy — Joe Rogan > [30:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=1856s) no one's illegal on stolen land — Joe Rogan > [45:26](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=2726s) a quarter of a million — Rupert Lowe > [49:24](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=2964s) 我进议会不是为了混日子，我只想说真话 — Rupert Lowe > [01:15:05](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=4505s) 年轻人如果不是自由主义者，就是没有心肝；老年人如果不是保守主义者，就是没有头脑 — Joe Rogan > [01:36:15](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=5775s) only when it's in the national interest is there any justification for going to war — Rupert Lowe > [01:38:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=5901s) 强奸就是强奸，不管罪犯来自穆斯林国家还是基督教国家，罪行就是罪行，必须受到同等严厉的惩处 — Rupert Lowe > [01:52:38](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=6758s) 因为如果你控制了法官，就能迫使越来越多的人走法官审判系统，而不是陪审团系统 — Rupert Lowe > [01:57:42](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=7062s) 这并不意味着我们需要一个由国家中央计划一切的体制。历史早就证明那根本行不通。中央计划带来的只能是对思想的封杀、对辩论的扼杀以及对言论自由的剥夺 — Rupert Lowe > [02:03:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=7383s) 如果他们投我，我将全力以赴逆转乾坤；如果他们不选我，那也是他们的自由和权利 — Rupert Lowe > [02:03:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY&t=7383s) That's democracy — Joe Rogan ## Mentioned Joe Rogan, Rupert Lowe, Great Yarmouth, Restore Britain, Bret Weinstein, Jordan Peterson, Elon Musk, Jean Monnet, Altiero Spinelli, James Goldsmith, USAID, World Economic Forum, Tony Blair, Lee Kuan Yew, Boris Johnson, Bibby Stockholm, Sammy Woodhouse, Graeme Smith, Enoch Powell, Donald Trump, Zia Yusuf, Reform UK, Lucy Connolly, Axel Rudakubana, Henry Novak, Klaus Schwab, George Orwell, Margaret Thatcher, Thomas Jefferson, Southampton F.C., Bilderbergers, Council on Foreign Relations, BBC, John Reith, Sky News, The Daily Telegraph, GB News, Patrick Christys, Fabian Society, Keir Starmer, George Bernard Shaw, Anders Tegnell, Dave Chappelle, CNN, Neil Young, Spotify, Chris Cuomo, Dave Smith, Gavin Newsom, FBI, Mike Benz, Rory Stewart, Tommy Robinson, Stephen Lawrence, David Cameron, Rupert Murdoch, The Times, Andy Burnham, Public Accounts Committee ## Video description Rupert Lowe is a British politician who has served as the member of Parliament for Great Yarmouth since 2024 and the leader of Restore Britain. Perplexity: Download the app or ask Perplexity anything at https://pplx.ai/rogan. onX Offroad: Try onX Offroad for 50% off- go to https://onXmaps.com/joerogan This video is sponsored by BetterHelp. Visit https://BetterHelp.com/JRE [Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k29cMrVtVXY)

Source quotes

[0:01] Rupert Lowe: Britain's in bad shape [5:57] Rupert Lowe: cultural oil and water mix [12:12] Rupert Lowe: illegal means illegal [27:58] Joe Rogan: You will own nothing and you will be happy [30:56] Joe Rogan: no one's illegal on stolen land [45:26] Rupert Lowe: a quarter of a million [49:24] Rupert Lowe: 我进议会不是为了混日子，我只想说真话 [75:05] Joe Rogan: 年轻人如果不是自由主义者，就是没有心肝；老年人如果不是保守主义者，就是没有头脑 [96:15] Rupert Lowe: only when it's in the national interest is there any justification for going to war [98:21] Rupert Lowe: 强奸就是强奸，不管罪犯来自穆斯林国家还是基督教国家，罪行就是罪行，必须受到同等严厉的惩处 [112:38] Rupert Lowe: 因为如果你控制了法官，就能迫使越来越多的人走法官审判系统，而不是陪审团系统 [117:42] Rupert Lowe: 这并不意味着我们需要一个由国家中央计划一切的体制。历史早就证明那根本行不通。中央计划带来的只能是对思想的封杀、对辩论的扼杀以及对言论自由的剥夺 [123:03] Rupert Lowe: 如果他们投我，我将全力以赴逆转乾坤；如果他们不选我，那也是他们的自由和权利 [123:03] Joe Rogan: That's democracy

Source quotes

[19:56] Rupert Lowe: There is a cultural difference of opinion between an open high trust Christian view of women particularly and the Islamic view of women... they are considered to be meat. [53:40] Rupert Lowe: inform, educate and entertain [53:40] Rupert Lowe: responsibly defund the BBC [53:40] Rupert Lowe: dripping poison into the veins of Britain every day [58:55] Joe Rogan: Like they're not even trying to hide it [58:55] Joe Rogan: just for a goof [75:31] Joe Rogan: Show me a young man who's not a liberal and I'll show you a man without a heart. Show me an old man who's not conservative and I'll show you a man without a brain. [99:52] Rupert Lowe: Apply the law, the law of our land to the people who are perpetrating it. [99:52] Rupert Lowe: indigenous white people [99:52] Joe Rogan: It's the reason why everyone's so pale. [101:12] Rupert Lowe: hostile environment [102:12] Rupert Lowe: canny old fox [102:12] Rupert Lowe: looks a bit like Beelzebub these days [119:40] Rupert Lowe: the Ghostbuster

Original transcript

[0:01] Joe Rogan podcast. Check it out. [0:04] >> The Joe Rogan Experience. [0:06] >> TRAIN BY DAY. JOE ROGAN PODCAST BY [0:08] NIGHT. All day. [0:12] >> Thank you for being here. Really [0:13] appreciate it. [0:13] >> No, it's my pleasure. [0:14] >> And thank you to uh Brett Weinstein, [0:16] Jordan Peterson, and Elon Musk for [0:19] helping connect us. They [0:21] >> We are going to see Elon on Sunday. So, [0:23] he's been an incredible support for us. [0:25] So, I I don't know how you want to play [0:27] the I'm totally in your hands. I'll I'll [0:29] follow your lead. But I mean, he's been [0:32] helping us cuz Britain's in bad shape. [0:34] And uh [0:34] >> Yeah. And that's why you're here. And [0:36] this is what we're talking about. We're [0:38] talking [0:38] >> Well, the rape gang, we've we've done [0:40] this is a [0:41] >> crowdfunded this. [0:43] >> Okay. [0:43] >> Uh which I'm very happy to to talk to [0:45] you about, which I think [0:46] >> just this title of that rape gang [0:49] report. Yeah. the idea that there's rape [0:51] there's actual rape gangs in the UK in [0:54] 2026 and it's is it being ignored? Is it [0:59] being downplayed? Like how is it being [1:01] received by the media and by the [1:04] politicians over there? [1:05] >> Well, the history of it is that [1:07] basically as you probably know uh [1:10] Britain after the war decided they were [1:12] going to play a part in Europe, a bigger [1:15] part in Europe. Well, our elite did, the [1:17] British elite. And to do that they had [1:19] to basically diminish the power of the [1:21] nation state and they had to head [1:23] towards this European superstate which [1:25] is is the EU. The genesis of which was [1:28] obviously in anomy. [1:28] >> Why did they have to diminish the power [1:30] of the nation to do that? [1:32] >> Because I think Britain was a proud [1:34] nation state. We we we with your with [1:36] the American help we'd won the war and [1:38] we hadn't been uh invaded or conquered [1:41] which most of Europe had been. So you'd [1:43] had mass uh dislocation in Europe. huge [1:46] numbers of people had been dislocated [1:48] and pushed all over all over Europe and [1:51] I think the socialists I was in the [1:53] European Parliament so I spent a brief [1:55] time as an MEP uh a member of the [1:58] European Parliament uh when we finally [2:01] achieved well a kind of Brexit we can [2:04] talk about that but it wasn't a proper [2:06] Brexit so I I I think the genesis of the [2:09] rape gangs going back to this was the [2:11] fact that multi-ulturalism [2:14] was the order of the day they wanted [2:15] open borders. They wanted a [2:17] multicultural society. They they they [2:20] basically felt the nation state had been [2:22] the cause of of world wars effectively [2:25] starting with Napoleon. Then obviously [2:27] we had uh the Kaiser then we had Hitler [2:29] and and and I think they saw it that way [2:32] the Mones, the Spinellis and the people [2:34] who constructed the European Union. So [2:36] to to to the rape gang report which was [2:39] your question ultimately that that the [2:42] genesis of that is this multicultural [2:45] invasion almost of of Europe. [2:47] >> Can I can I pause you for a second? So [2:49] what you think is that the multicultural [2:52] invasion the way the way it was set up [2:54] was on purpose and it was on purpose to [2:57] sort of diminish the idea of [2:58] nationalism. [2:59] >> Yes. I I think that that well I'm I'm [3:02] >> and so this was like a long plan. So [3:04] this was something that they must have [3:06] had to sit down and like who would be [3:08] involved in this sort of a discussion [3:10] where you would be willing to diminish [3:13] patriotism, diminish this idea that [3:16] Britain by itself is exceptional and the [3:18] people are exceptional. [3:19] >> It's a it was a long deceitful plan. So [3:22] I I always say [3:23] >> who implemented it. [3:24] >> The European elites in league with our [3:27] elite who effectively if you remember in [3:30] 1975 we had what was we we joined what [3:33] was called the European economic [3:34] community. It wasn't uh effectively uh [3:38] anything other than an economic union. [3:40] But that that very quickly uh changed [3:43] and effectively they tried to [3:45] politically integrate Europe that failed [3:47] and then in 97 uh they tried to force it [3:50] through with the introduction of the [3:53] euro. So having failed politically they [3:55] tried to do it financially. [3:57] That was my first uh uh foray into [4:00] standing as a member of parliament to [4:01] fight to save the British pound because [4:04] once you lose your currency effectively [4:06] you lose your your sovereignty and your [4:07] national identity and our gold reserves [4:10] were going to be shipped out to Germany [4:12] to Frankfurt uh and we would have become [4:15] a vassal state part of the European [4:17] Union. It would have been irreversible. [4:18] But in the event we thanks to Sir James [4:20] Goldsmith, we secured enough votes. We [4:23] forced uh the establishment to promise a [4:26] referendum before they surrendered to [4:28] the to the euro and we ended up saving [4:31] the pound which in the end resulted in [4:33] the referendum in 2016 where the British [4:35] people voted to take back their [4:37] sovereignty which ultimately I think the [4:39] establishment always knew that the core [4:42] the body of Britain or body of England [4:44] in particular wanted its own accountable [4:47] parliament in Westminster. It didn't [4:49] want to be part of an unaccountable [4:51] European socialist protectionist [4:53] superstate. [4:54] >> So the quote unquote elites in in [4:58] Britain and the the elites United [5:00] States, this it's coordinated with both [5:02] of them. Is that [5:04] >> I think less so in America, Joe. I I I I [5:06] can't speak for America. Although when [5:08] you look at what the Democrats did uh [5:09] with US aid and all the stuff that was [5:11] going on uh under Joe Biden, you have to [5:14] wonder whether they began with the World [5:16] Economic Forum to play a part in this. [5:18] But I I think the post-war plan for [5:21] Europe was founded on a socialist [5:23] principle. Whereas I think America has [5:25] always been a a very sound uh uh [5:29] politically based structure based on [5:32] obviously uh you know the founding [5:33] fathers and your constitution which I [5:36] always think uh returns power to the [5:38] individual and has always understood [5:41] that the dangers are status dangers not [5:43] individual dangers. So I'm very much in [5:46] the camp I like the individual and a [5:48] minimal state and I and I think that's [5:50] much more in your DNA than it is in the [5:52] European DNA which which tends to be [5:56] more statist [5:57] >> right so they did this on purpose and [6:00] they brought in people from what country [6:04] specifically? Well, initially you got [6:06] you got in Britain uh you got people [6:09] from Africa, you got the Windrush uh [6:11] generation. So you got a lot of Africans [6:14] came uh ostensibly to fill jobs that [6:17] they always say the British people don't [6:19] want to do and it it gathered momentum. [6:23] Uh it was relatively slow to start with. [6:25] So you you you had an influx of people [6:28] coming to the UK. You had open borders [6:30] in Europe. So one of the the absolute uh [6:34] embedded rules they have is this freedom [6:36] of movement concept. So they don't have [6:39] effectively national borders. But we we [6:42] still obviously had the the the channel [6:44] but we embraced this and we started this [6:47] uh immigration. [6:49] What happened uh is it gradually [6:51] happened and I think these rape gangs [6:53] have been going on or we know they have [6:55] for 30 40 probably 50 years to a lesser [6:58] extent. But when Tony Blair got in and [7:01] he undermined a lot of constitutional [7:05] sort of historical law, uh you got an [7:08] acceleration of immigration uh from [7:11] other parts of the world, not not just [7:13] from Europe but also from other [7:15] countries uh South Asian countries in [7:18] particular who came uh to the UK. And [7:21] the genesis of the rape gangs really is [7:25] I think the cultural oil and water mix [7:27] of [7:29] uh these people coming from what I call [7:31] clanish societies in South Asia uh and [7:35] join coming to very high trust societies [7:37] such as the one we had and the one you [7:39] have here which have taken thousands of [7:42] years to develop. So they're high trust [7:44] societies where and you know Lee Kuanu [7:46] based Singapore on postwar Britain where [7:50] you could you had tr you had honesty [7:51] boxes for newspapers in London and you [7:54] had a country that was completely at [7:55] peace with itself. Uh so it won the war, [7:58] it respected peace, it respected freedom [8:01] and people were building rebuilding [8:02] their lives having fought a second world [8:05] war to to to free Europe from from from [8:08] sort of in this case Germany. Um [8:10] previously we'd done it at Waterloo when [8:12] we uh relieved Europe of of the French [8:15] with Napoleon. So it's it really [8:18] accelerated after 97 when uh a lot of [8:21] the legislation that Tony Blair and his [8:23] cohorts passed [8:25] uh such as the h human rights act which [8:27] embeds within it the ECR uh he created [8:30] the supreme court he they passed laws [8:33] like the equalities act and there are [8:34] raft of other legal acts they passed [8:37] which effectively [8:39] empowered a multicultural society uh [8:42] which in some ways I think damaged the [8:45] interests of of of the British people. [8:48] So, [8:48] >> and you think this is on purpose and [8:50] this is my point is what is the benefit [8:52] for them to be joined up with the rest [8:55] of Europe? Is it just purely financial? [8:58] Is it a powerbased strategy where if you [9:01] can diminish the quality of life for [9:03] people and institute more laws and put [9:06] more restrictions on them, you can [9:08] control them easier and it's less push [9:11] back for the politicians, less push back [9:13] for the people that are in charge. [9:15] basically yes I I think it's the age-old [9:17] battle between individualism and [9:20] collectivism. So so I I think the EU is [9:25] a collectivist construct whereas I think [9:28] Britain as it was under our constitution [9:31] our bill of rights which as you probably [9:32] know our bill of rights in 1689 a lot of [9:35] that was lifted to by your founding [9:38] fathers who who who embedded it within [9:40] the US constitution. [9:43] So, and that embeds freedom of speech. [9:46] It embeds the individual. It embeds all [9:48] of the all of the rights that I think [9:50] make the Anglo-Saxon world great. And [9:54] >> so, how did it deteriorate to the point [9:55] where they're arresting 12,000 people a [9:58] year for social media posts? [9:59] >> It's Joe, it's shocking. And this is why [10:02] I I have got involved in politics. I've [10:04] been involved in politics since I fought [10:06] the master treaty and then stood, as I [10:07] said, in 97. and I did a lot for [10:09] business for Sterling, a lot for vote [10:11] leave. Then I stood for the Brexit party [10:13] and I was elected there. So I've I've [10:15] been fighting this uh march towards an [10:19] unaccountable state which effectively [10:21] rewards collectivism and punishes [10:23] individualism [10:25] uh to the extent that now I find myself [10:27] at the age of 68 uh as an MP running a [10:31] party called Restore Britain to try and [10:34] reverse this tide to reempower the [10:37] individual to return to our original [10:40] constitution and to protect the [10:42] interests above all else of the of the [10:43] Brit British people to whom I think [10:45] government should be accountable. [10:46] >> Do they still have that kind of [10:48] unchecked immigration? Is it currently [10:49] ongoing? [10:50] >> We still have illegal migrants arriving [10:52] by boat. Uh they can't they can't be [10:55] under the current uh uh laws and [10:57] treaties that we're part of. They are [10:59] they're not being deported. The judges, [11:02] thanks to the creation of the Supreme [11:04] Court, uh they they are now a quango, a [11:07] woke quango. I think a lot of our [11:09] judiciary is corrupt. So the answer to [11:12] your question is we still have illegal [11:14] migration [11:15] and we have people living in Britain [11:17] illegally. We have a lot of foreign [11:19] prisons in our in our in our in our [11:22] prisons [11:23] and we have people who've come in under [11:26] various waves of immigration. one one of [11:28] which the biggest of which was probably [11:29] under Boris Johnson who was actually a [11:31] conservative prime minister who allowed [11:34] uh uh thousands hundreds of thousands of [11:37] people to come uh into Britain and uh [11:40] basically they are now a burden to the [11:43] British taxpayer so the answer to your [11:45] question is they're arriving illegally [11:47] still they're living here illegally or [11:49] living in Britain illegally still uh [11:51] we've got foreign criminals in our [11:52] prisons and we've got we've still got [11:54] the legacy of this huge amount of of of [11:57] immig immigration which took place [11:59] >> and are a large percentage of these [12:01] people receiving welfare from the [12:03] British government? [12:04] >> Yes. [12:04] >> What percentage? [12:06] >> Well, most of the people who who [12:07] arrival, they're all supported, Joe. I [12:09] mean, they're put in as soon as you get [12:12] there. [12:12] >> In parliament, I see the contracts [12:14] thanks to my parliamentary questions. [12:16] I'm allowed to ask questions and [12:18] scrutinize the contracts for, for [12:20] instance, the BB Stockholm was it was a [12:22] boat which cost the British taxpayer1 [12:24] half billion pounds. uh it's actually [12:27] now lying redundant uh uh and not being [12:29] used. But I've seen the contracts for uh [12:33] these illegal migrants in terms of the [12:36] laundry services they get, in terms of [12:38] the taxi services they get, in terms of [12:41] the food they require. I mean literally [12:44] it is like uh uh it's like staying in a [12:47] very comfortable hotel. And we've now [12:49] got these people being settled all [12:50] across our country. [12:52] >> How many in hotels? Well, I don't think [12:55] the government knows, Joe, to answer [12:57] your question. I don't think they know [12:58] how many people are living in Britain [12:59] illegally. [13:00] >> Was the similar situation that America [13:02] had over the last four years where the [13:04] at on the low number, they think it was [13:06] 10 million people came in, which is [13:08] insane. It's an insane amount of people [13:10] to come in in four years. [13:12] >> We we think there's enough work to do [13:14] initially to detain and deport people [13:16] who are arriving illegally. I mean, to [13:18] my mind, illegal means illegal. So it's [13:20] fairly straightforward [13:22] um to uh the people who are arriving [13:25] illegally, people living here illegally, [13:27] the foreign criminals, there's plenty of [13:29] work to do to remove them from Britain. [13:31] And then I think we need to turn our [13:33] attention and that's in our mass [13:34] deportation document. I've given you a [13:36] copy of that which effectively sets out [13:39] the constitutional reasons why we have a [13:41] problem, how we correct those [13:43] constitutional issues, and how we then [13:46] practically uh detain and deport uh the [13:49] people who aren't supposed to be here. [13:51] And once we've done that, we we will [13:52] then turn our attention to people who [13:54] are living in Britain, to your point, [13:56] who are on welfare, who are going to [13:58] cost the taxpayer a fortune for the rest [14:00] of their lives probably, who aren't [14:02] working, who are culturally different to [14:04] us, who have a different view of of of [14:07] of their religion to the Christian [14:09] religion, uh, and are increasingly [14:12] living in in in small groups of people [14:14] who haven't integrated, who are living [14:17] under Sharia law and and who have their [14:19] own courts and and who [14:21] >> they have their own courts. [14:22] >> They have their own courts, Sharia [14:23] courts. Yes. Parallel a parallel legal [14:25] system. [14:26] >> Okay. So, it's a unrecognized by the [14:28] British government. Parallel legal [14:30] system that exists inside of England. [14:31] >> It's tolerated. [14:32] >> Tolerated. So, it's they're aware of it. [14:35] >> Yes. [14:35] >> And they're aware of the punishments [14:36] that this court dishes out. [14:38] >> They It's rather like they're policing [14:40] their own people under their own laws [14:43] >> and they're just allowing that. [14:44] >> They're they're allowing that. Yeah. [14:46] >> Whoa. [14:47] Now, now I believe I don't know about [14:48] you, but I believe if you come to our [14:50] country, you should live under our laws. [14:53] >> Well, yeah. I mean, the idea of [14:56] well, the United States in particular is [14:58] a melting pot and you know, people come [15:00] from all over the place and it's one of [15:01] the cool things that there's all these [15:03] different cultures, but there's certain [15:05] cultures that if you allow them to come [15:08] into your community and then they [15:10] institute the laws of the country where [15:12] they came from, you're going to have a [15:14] real problem. like they don't live the [15:17] way you live. They don't have the same [15:19] respect for women that you have. They [15:21] don't treat them the same way. They [15:22] don't allow dogs. Like there's a lot of [15:25] like [15:26] >> stuff that a lot of people might not [15:28] even be aware that come with that [15:30] problem. It's like the idea is supposed [15:33] to be that western society is inclusive [15:35] and progressive because we're [15:37] intelligent and educated and we care. [15:41] But you you can care so much that you [15:44] let in criminals and then you give those [15:46] criminals all your money and then the [15:48] criminals can take over your country [15:50] slowly but surely. So and this is the no [15:53] one thinks that's a possible thing. No [15:56] people look at the coliseum, you look at [15:58] ancient Greece and they they think, [15:59] "Wow, I wonder what happened to those [16:00] guys." What do you think happened? [16:02] Probably the same that's happening [16:04] right now to England. The same that [16:06] could have happened to America. It's [16:09] civilizations fall apart for various [16:11] reasons. And uh one great way to get [16:14] them to fall apart is to bring in a [16:16] bunch of people and they don't have to [16:18] follow your laws and they bring the laws [16:20] of, you know, wherever they're from, [16:22] whatever whatever fundamentalist [16:25] religion country they're from where they [16:27] have a bunch of crazy laws that are kind [16:30] of archaic. [16:32] >> Well, this is Sharia law, Islamic law, [16:34] as you probably know. I mean again to [16:35] your point uh I I think the best example [16:38] uh I can I can give people of what [16:41] happens if you do that is is is when [16:45] Lebanon got its got its independence in [16:47] in 1948. [16:49] Uh they were Christian country and they [16:51] were a very confident country. They they [16:52] were you know they had the best [16:54] universities. They had a very open [16:56] society. I never went to Beirut. I don't [16:58] know if you you went to Beirut, but [16:59] Beirut in the 60s was meant to be the [17:01] best place on earth to be. Great wine, [17:05] uh, freedom, uh, very very enlightened. [17:08] Uh, it was a great lots of people uh, [17:10] uh, were there. The minute that the [17:12] Muslim population went over about 15%, [17:15] you started to get a problem with a [17:19] civil war. You got the Drews and [17:20] Marinite Christians in a in in a in a [17:23] civil war with with the Muslims. Uh and [17:26] now Lebanon is is is a Muslim country. [17:29] Uh uh and Hezbollah backed by Iran is [17:32] effectively running the show. So So to [17:35] your point, I couldn't agree more. And [17:36] the rape gang report which I which which [17:38] is which we've written was crowdfunded [17:41] by 20,000 concerned English people who [17:44] who uh we we raised not a huge amount of [17:47] money. We raised about £600,000 [17:50] in varying quantities. people gave and [17:53] we did it because the government will [17:56] not have a statute of inquiry. So our [17:58] government and particularly the Labor [18:00] Party have been presiding over this [18:03] because it goes to the Muslim block [18:05] vote. So we have in in the UK a system [18:08] of postal voting [18:10] and in a lot of the inner cities and the [18:12] places where these Islamic populations [18:15] live, they are or have historically [18:18] voted labor. That's beginning to change. [18:20] they're beginning to vote for Muslim [18:21] independence now and I sit with some of [18:23] them at the back of parliament. [18:25] So, so effectively this this inquiry we [18:29] did, we set out with a completely [18:34] unbiased uh view of what we would find [18:37] and we did it because we were pushing [18:39] the government to have a statutory [18:41] inquiry and I I I a lot of the reason [18:45] I'm got involved in it was I I I I think [18:47] it was Elon Musk who triggered he he he [18:49] talked about it because a lot of people [18:51] in the UK I don't think know the extent [18:54] to which this has been happening and and [18:56] and and the length of time it's been [18:57] happening for. [18:58] >> This episode is brought to you by OnX [19:00] Off-Road. Ever wonder how to reach these [19:02] epic mountain lakes? They're tucked away [19:05] dispersed campsites. With OnX Off-Road, [19:09] you'll find legal open trails around you [19:11] and even better guided trails mapped by [19:14] real off-roaders. Each one includes [19:16] photos, terrain descriptions, and [19:18] difficulty ratings so you'll know if [19:20] your vehicle is capable before you go. [19:23] Unlike other apps, OnX gives you [19:25] turnbyturn directions on the trail, and [19:28] their new disperse camping layer shows [19:30] where you can legally set up camp. [19:32] You'll also get private land boundaries, [19:35] public land overlays, and the ability to [19:37] download maps for offline use so that [19:40] you're never guessing, even when you're [19:42] off the grid. It's a powerful tool built [19:45] for serious off-roaders. Try OnX [19:48] Off-Road for 50% off. Go to [19:51] onxmaps.com/joan. [19:56] >> Why is that? What is that a failure of [19:58] your media? Is it a failure of the [20:00] politicians? Like why why don't people [20:01] know about this? [20:02] >> It's a total failure failure of the [20:03] media because the media are supposed to [20:05] be an independent body that holds to [20:07] account uh failures of of the state. And [20:11] it's basically because this block vote [20:15] uh through the postal voting system [20:17] which needs to be changed uh is [20:20] effectively or has been uh keeping lab [20:23] the Labor party in in power. So they've [20:25] put power ahead of principle and in the [20:29] report we cover this. We've covered the [20:31] reasons why it's so serious and and to [20:34] your point, we even cover, as you quite [20:35] rightly say, the fact that uh dogs are [20:38] are not liked by by by by the Islamic [20:41] faith largely because Muhammad liked [20:43] cats. He didn't like dogs. And and and [20:46] we we what we wanted to do was interview [20:48] victims, which we did. We did it [20:50] properly. It took us over a year. We had [20:53] a a rape gang victim, Sammy Woodhouse, [20:56] who who who led it. she's got a child by [20:58] her rapist. [21:00] Uh, and we had a team of people and we [21:03] literally produced the witness bundles [21:05] and we and we listened to uh, the [21:07] witnesses and then we had a two-week [21:09] hearing in London where people gave [21:11] evidence and we had a a proper uh, [21:14] barrista who effectively presided over [21:17] it and then help helped us write the [21:20] report. It's effectively Graeme Smith's [21:22] the barristister did a fantastic job. [21:25] And we didn't start out with any [21:26] preconceived ideas. It started because [21:28] we read some court transcripts of some [21:30] of the people who've been found guilty [21:32] of of this, which the government, by the [21:34] way, has tried to keep quiet. Some of [21:37] the historical uh uh court transcripts [21:40] disappear. [21:42] So, uh we've been calling for these [21:44] transcripts to be kept. Now, we've [21:46] actually uh tried to make a noise about [21:48] that. And the more we read this and the [21:52] more we carried on with the rape gang uh [21:55] inquiry, the more it became clear to us [21:58] that obviously there's a link between [22:01] this this power and and the the abuse [22:05] and and and and grooming and and and if [22:08] you like damage that was done to white [22:11] working-class English girls and it does [22:13] go and and in the report we've we've [22:15] looked at the reasons why to your point [22:17] there is a cultural difference of opin [22:19] opinion between an open high trust [22:23] Christian view of women particularly and [22:26] and the Islamic view of women which is [22:28] all in the report. So for instance the [22:31] as you probably know if a woman accuses [22:35] uh somebody of rape and a lot of these [22:37] Muslims come from Pakistan Joe that [22:39] they're predominantly Pakistan and [22:42] they're predominantly from one part of [22:44] Pakistan called Meipur and there are [22:46] some from Bangladesh there are some from [22:48] Somalia there are some from Eratraa that [22:50] that there are other other Muslim [22:53] countries that that perpetrate some of [22:55] this and of course there are white [22:57] people who perpetrate rape as well but [22:59] nothing on the scale of this. This is [23:02] this is quite horrific. And our report [23:05] has effectively uncovered this. I think [23:07] we've played a part with this report in [23:10] the government saying that they're going [23:12] to have now a statutory inquiry because [23:14] we didn't have any statutory powers to [23:16] be able to uh force people to appear at [23:19] our hearing. They all appeared [23:20] voluntarily. The government can actually [23:21] force people legally to appear. They can [23:23] actually uh uh make it a legal [23:26] requirement that people attend. we we [23:28] couldn't do that. [23:30] But there had been reports in the past [23:34] uh there was the Jay report in in in in [23:37] 2014 and there's been the Casey report [23:40] all of which confirmed that this was [23:42] happening and the state still continued [23:45] to try and pretend it was just happening [23:47] in a small number of siloed areas uh [23:51] where where you obviously had a high [23:52] Islamic population. [23:54] the state has equally failed to collect [23:57] data on the crimes that are perpetrated. [24:00] So the ethnicity of of the people who [24:02] are perpetrating the crimes and from [24:04] there you can extrapolate once you've [24:05] got the data as to whether or not you've [24:08] got an extraordinary problem in one [24:10] particular section of society. and and [24:13] again using my parliamentary questions [24:14] I've been forcing uh uh as much [24:17] disclosure as I can get and this is how [24:19] we've discovered that a lot of the data [24:20] that should be being collected by the [24:23] police particularly by the national [24:25] health service by social services a lot [24:27] of the data has not been properly [24:29] collected possibly because the state [24:32] does I think know that this is happening [24:35] but they don't want to admit that their [24:38] multicultural experiment which as you [24:40] probably know famously Enoch Powell [24:42] warned would fail uh with his speech, [24:44] the the rivers of blood speech for which [24:47] he was heavily criticized. So I I think [24:50] they do know, but they don't want to [24:52] admit it. They don't want to be called [24:54] racist. Uh they don't want to and this [24:57] has permeated the whole of British [24:59] society since Tony Blair. People are [25:00] frightened to be accused of effectively [25:04] being biased and white. And we're taught [25:08] about things, you probably I don't know [25:09] whether you have it here, unconscious [25:10] bias and and all of the other sort of [25:12] what I call woke woke DEI driven uh [25:16] rubbish which which has permeated [25:19] Britain in the same way I think it may [25:21] have originally come from from you guys. [25:23] But it's [25:24] >> it's it's certainly had a huge effect on [25:27] us. [25:27] >> I think it had a great grip on us for a [25:29] few years and it's lessened its hold [25:32] >> well thanks to the Donald. Yeah. [25:34] >> Yeah. that helped a lot and I think a [25:36] big part of it was Elon buying Twitter. [25:38] >> Yeah. [25:38] >> Where you got legitimate free speech and [25:41] which is again back to this 12,000 [25:43] people getting arrested uh each year for [25:45] social media post recently. Like that is [25:48] >> how is that tolerated? I just don't [25:51] understand how people aren't I I was [25:53] about to say up in arms, but that's also [25:55] part of the problem is that no one's [25:57] armed over there. [25:58] >> We we we are we well I have actually got [26:00] some guns, Jose, cuz I I have a farm. So [26:03] when you come to the UK, I hope you'll [26:04] come and shoot some feeasants with me. [26:06] >> Oh. [26:06] >> Uh but um [26:07] >> but if you don't have a farm, [26:09] >> uh well, if you don't have a farm, you [26:10] you'll find it very difficult to get a [26:12] gun of any kind and even if you have a [26:14] farm. So, uh, Reform tried to [26:17] politically assassinate me, uh, uh, in [26:19] in in in 25, early 25, and made false [26:24] accusations about me threatening to hit [26:26] one of the Z Y Yousef in a meeting, and [26:29] somebody was saying, I went around [26:30] Parliament saying I was a very good shot [26:31] and I was going to shoot Zia Ysef. I [26:33] mean, as if, if you believe that, I'm [26:34] I'm I've got a completely clean record. [26:36] I employ lots of people. I have lots of [26:38] businesses and I've never had an issue. [26:40] But listen, for armed police turned up, [26:42] took all my guns away. I mean, and I'm a [26:45] member of parliament. I said to them, [26:46] "Guys, you could have just called me up [26:47] and we could have talked about it, but [26:48] no." [26:49] >> Wow. [26:49] >> They turned up [26:50] >> just from an accusation. [26:52] >> 9:30 at night, left at4 to 12. We got [26:56] them on the cameras, took all my guns, [26:58] all my ammo, and it took me five or 6 [27:01] months to get them get get them all [27:03] back. But but look, so they don't want [27:07] the public uh to have guns. Uh and they [27:11] are doing their very best to damage the [27:14] shooters uh who perfectly legitimately [27:17] like to go and shoot clay pigeons uh who [27:20] like to go and shoot game who like to go [27:22] and hunt. Uh effectively they're trying [27:25] to make that very difficult through the [27:27] the licensing laws for guns. As you [27:30] probably know they banned handguns uh [27:32] >> the '90s right [27:33] >> in the late 90s because there was a [27:35] murder up in [27:36] >> Dumb Blaine. [27:37] >> One murder. [27:38] >> One murder. So, so everybody, my father [27:40] used to shoot pistols for Oxford [27:42] University and he had he's dead now, [27:43] bless him. But he had all his pistols [27:46] were taken away. The gun the pistols he [27:48] used to shoot with at Oxford University. [27:50] I mean I mean we now have a society [27:53] which needs radical change and and we [27:56] need to release the individual. And to [27:59] your point on social media posts, there [28:01] was a a lovely lady, Lucy Connley, uh [28:04] who was locked up for something for 32 [28:06] months for just a very uh emotional uh [28:11] social media post which she deleted [28:13] after 4 hours about the Southport [28:16] killings where where this chap Axel [28:18] Rutabana [28:20] uh went and knifed three young girls and [28:23] killed them. uh despite the fact that [28:25] the British state through prevent was [28:26] aware of this uh and we've had a similar [28:29] case recently with Henry Novak where [28:31] again uh uh um it was actually I think [28:34] on this occasion of seek uh stabbed him [28:38] and the police despite the fact when [28:40] they arrived at the the scene he told [28:42] them he'd been stabbed the police didn't [28:45] believe him and they tried to handcuff [28:47] him uh and as a result of that it's [28:50] arguable that they opened up the wound [28:52] the stab wound and he drowned found in [28:54] his own blood. Meanwhile, his murderer [28:57] was never handcuffed. [28:59] So, this is this is where the British [29:01] state's gone completely wrong. So, [29:03] instead of uh one law for everybody and [29:06] one policing for everybody, this this [29:10] sort of view that the the white [29:12] population is racist, which I don't [29:14] personally believe them to be, I think [29:16] Britain is is a very tolerant country. [29:19] Do you think that this perspective [29:22] um that society sort of adopted in the [29:25] UK about white people being bad, do you [29:28] think this was [29:31] ar there was architecture to it? This [29:33] was by design that this was done or is [29:35] this just a a natural response to people [29:39] being called racist? Because was there [29:41] of course in the past there was more [29:43] racism than there is today and people [29:45] always want to point to that racism as [29:48] you know evidence of colonialism, [29:50] evidence of what whatever it is that [29:51] happened in days past. But why why in [29:56] England do you think that narrative took [29:58] hold so well? [29:59] >> Because I think Joe to your point that [30:01] this post-war plan for multiculturalism [30:05] I I think they realized that they was by [30:07] design. [30:08] >> They've got a problem. So part of it was [30:10] probably infiltrating the universities [30:12] and promoting these kind of ideas. [30:14] >> It's almost as if uh uh with the World [30:17] Economic Forum there's this view that [30:20] the Anglo-Saxon nations have commanded [30:24] and dominated too much of the world's [30:26] resources. And there's almost like this [30:28] misguided altruistic view that that we [30:31] should become uh more concerned with [30:34] global welfare rather than the welfare [30:35] of our own citizens, which I totally [30:38] disagree with. [30:39] >> Well, there's also the you will own [30:40] nothing and you will be happy. [30:42] >> This is this is your Claus Schwab uh uh [30:45] >> which is hilarious. Someone would even [30:47] say that out loud. [30:48] >> I know. [30:49] >> You own nothing and you will be happy. [30:51] Like is this a part of an Orwell book? [30:55] cuz this doesn't seem like a real person [30:56] would say something like that cuz who [30:58] the is going to listen to that? It [31:00] doesn't make any sense. [31:01] >> Well, George was being rather accurate [31:03] in time. [31:03] >> He's dead on. He was actually pretty [31:05] optimistic. Like his view, his version [31:08] of the world was uh, you know, a little [31:10] bit more palatable than what we're [31:11] dealing with right now. [31:12] >> Interesting man, oldian. Uh, fought in [31:14] the Spanish Civil War. I mean, he was a [31:18] he was a very quirky Englishman who [31:22] clearly had a hugely precient foresight. [31:24] And I think probably like certainly like [31:26] me, [31:27] >> he had a healthy uh disrespect for what [31:30] I call collectivist statism. And he was [31:33] a very much an individual and and uh a [31:37] believer in the individual. [31:38] >> It's it's it's really interesting [31:39] because when I first read that book was [31:41] in high school and I kept thinking like [31:43] what a crazy this would never happen. [31:46] This is not even possible. But what a [31:47] crazy world this guy's created in his [31:50] imagination. Yeah. [31:51] >> Of things going completely haywire. And [31:53] then you realize as time goes on, oh [31:55] that's totally possible. It's totally [31:57] possible that things can get that [31:58] ridiculous. I mean, when you're dealing [32:00] with, you know, male, biologically male [32:03] athletes that compete against women [32:05] because they identify as a woman and use [32:07] women's locker rooms. All the craziness [32:09] that we deal with today, the open border [32:11] situation, no one's illegal on stolen [32:13] land. Hey, off. Like, what are we [32:16] what are we doing? Like, what is this? [32:18] Well, it's almost as if we're if we're [32:21] subverting all the things that made us [32:23] great. [32:24] >> Yeah. And you know, there's nothing [32:26] wrong with immigration, but there is [32:28] it's probably a good idea to make sure [32:29] no someone's not a murderer [32:31] before you let them in. Like the idea [32:33] that there should be no border at all is [32:35] like if the world was perfect, that [32:38] sounds wonderful. If the world was [32:40] perfect and everybody paid their taxes [32:42] and everybody followed the laws, why [32:44] have borders? Clearly, it's not perfect. [32:47] you know, go to go to Pakistan, go to [32:50] Karachi, go go hang out, go go down the [32:53] street as a woman in a miniskirt and see [32:55] how that works out. Go to some place. [32:57] >> Again, Joe, this is this is you're quite [32:59] right. This is I mean Pakistan is is I [33:01] think the example example of a rogue [33:03] state basically. And and [33:05] >> I I I think their view of as you say [33:10] women who dress uh in ways other than uh [33:13] the ways of Sharia, i.e. totally [33:15] covered. [33:16] >> Yes. And again, it's all in uh various [33:18] of the hadiths which which which we [33:20] quote in in the rape gang report. They [33:23] are considered to be meat. And and this [33:25] is this is something I've never [33:27] understood. How do you square this [33:29] circle of this sort of clanish uh [33:33] backward-looking culture which comes to [33:36] a highly open uh high trust society and [33:39] then embeds itself within that society [33:42] and undermines everything that we've [33:43] achieved over over a thousand years. [33:46] >> Acknowledging that is somehow another [33:47] racist. Acknowledging that some cultures [33:49] are superior is somehow another racist. [33:51] just by by just understanding human [33:54] rights, understanding the rights of [33:56] individuals to be free to not be [33:58] subjected to other people's archaic [34:01] laws. And this is look these a lot of [34:04] cultures in this world live as people [34:06] lived thousands of years ago. No one in [34:09] the United States wants to live as [34:10] people lived thousands of years ago. No [34:12] one. And this is not a racist thing. [34:15] Like you should be able to come over [34:17] here and practice whatever religion you [34:18] want. But if your religion has rules [34:22] that violate the laws that we've all [34:25] agreed are just and fair, then that [34:27] you're not integrating and you're and if [34:29] you take over a whole town and now that [34:32] town is subject to these archaic laws, [34:36] we've got a problem. And if you let that [34:38] problem get bigger and bigger, they take [34:40] over the country. And that's that's an [34:42] actual possibility for certain [34:44] countries. And we we have to recognize [34:46] that civilization is not as sturdy as we [34:49] like to think it is. It's kind of kind [34:52] of flimsy in a lot of ways. A few bad [34:54] things can happen and things can go [34:56] sideways quite quickly. [34:58] >> Well, I think liberty is very fragile, [35:00] isn't it? Ultimately, if you don't [35:02] protect liberty, you lose it. It was [35:04] Margaret Thatcher who was very strong on [35:06] this. [35:06] >> And you have to have laws. [35:08] >> You have to have laws and you have But [35:09] what you also have to have is everyone [35:11] should be equal under the law. [35:12] >> Yes. And to your point, I couldn't agree [35:14] more. I mean, Britain used to be a very [35:16] tolerant society. So, for instance, [35:17] Europe was very anti-semitic. Britain [35:20] was never anti-Semitic. We used to [35:22] welcome a lot of uh uh Jews and [35:24] Protestants from Europe who were being [35:26] persecuted, particularly in France with [35:28] the Protestants. So, we were a very [35:30] tolerant society, but the people who [35:32] came integrated and they contributed. [35:35] And that is the essence I think of [35:37] sensible immigration. So it should be [35:39] limited, targeted and it should be only [35:42] people who accept your religion and your [35:44] culture and your [35:45] >> What do you do though if someone comes [35:47] over here and then they they're not [35:50] violating laws? They're not violating [35:52] any laws. They achieve citizenship, but [35:55] then they start bringing over more and [35:57] more people and then start instituting [36:00] Sharia law. What do you do? Do you [36:01] deport them all? Like how do you like [36:03] this idea of having all these people [36:06] recognizing how many people got in [36:07] illegally, deporting them, mass [36:09] deportations, deportating deporting [36:11] criminals? It all sounds great until you [36:14] talk about actually implementing it. [36:16] Like how do you do that? How are you [36:18] doing that? Are you going to knock on [36:19] people's doors and pull them out of [36:20] their homes and ship them back to where [36:22] they came from? Like how do you do that? [36:24] I think the first thing you do is you [36:25] you you stop them coming across [36:27] >> how many [36:28] >> they shouldn't be coming anywhere under [36:29] international law because they're [36:30] traveling over across safe countries. So [36:32] they shouldn't be coming. [36:33] >> What's the estimate of the amount of [36:35] illegal immigration that you have in [36:37] Britain? [36:37] >> It's almost impossible to say how many [36:39] people are living there illegally or [36:41] living with us illegally. But in our [36:43] paper, I mean, we we think it's sort of [36:45] 1.8 to to 2 million people probably. Uh [36:49] that's our estimate. But people [36:51] arriving, we know how many are arriving. [36:52] There's there's a lot arriving every [36:54] day, particularly when the when the the [36:56] the the sea is calm. [36:58] >> How many arrive every day? [36:59] >> They're coming. Well, it can vary. I [37:00] mean, you can get a thousand in a day. [37:02] You can get if the sea's rough, you get [37:04] you get none because obviously they [37:06] suffer if if they try and cross in in [37:08] little overcrowded dingies that they [37:11] can't get across. But we're paying the [37:13] French over half a billion pounds a year [37:15] to try and stop it. Uh uh that I think [37:18] is is not happening. Uh and as a result [37:21] of that, you know, our border border [37:22] patrol uh picks them up, gives them [37:24] bottles of water, brings them in and and [37:26] settles them in in hotels and and and [37:29] pays them well pays them welfare. They [37:31] become and then they then they then they [37:33] apply for residency and they say they're [37:36] asylum seekers. I I argue most of them [37:38] are economic migrants, but you know, our [37:40] our woke culture is is not protecting [37:44] the interests of the British people. And [37:46] it's also a massive incentive. If you [37:48] live in a terribly poor country and you [37:51] can just get to England and then [37:53] instantaneously you will get money and [37:55] housing. [37:55] >> That's right. [37:56] >> Why would you not do that? [37:58] >> Well, not only that, you go to the top [37:59] of the waiting list for dental [38:01] treatment, which which British people [38:03] don't get. The NHS go to the top of the [38:05] waiting list. [38:06] >> Wait a minute. They get they get access [38:08] to dental treatment that the British [38:09] people don't get. [38:10] >> Correct. Correct. [38:11] >> Why Why do immigrants get access to it? [38:13] Well, this Joe is the mystery of of what [38:17] our uh leaders I don't know what they [38:20] think they're doing, but they have this [38:22] misguided view that these people are [38:25] actually they call them asylum seekers. [38:27] They say they need to be looked after [38:28] and protected, uh they're not. They're [38:31] economic migrants. And to your point, if [38:33] you if they know there's there's welfare [38:35] when they reach Britain, they'll travel [38:36] across multiple safe countries to get to [38:38] the welfare, the free housing, [38:40] >> Yeah. of course. [38:41] >> And all the other stuff. So, and then uh [38:43] unless you uh deal with issues like the [38:46] rape gangs and you force them to adhere [38:48] to UK law and respect our our laws, our [38:52] culture and our religion, they gradually [38:55] uh set up their own uh uh uh cultures [38:58] and with their own laws as I said and [39:00] and there are large trackcts of the [39:02] country now where uh we've got these [39:05] Islamic settlements which which [39:07] effectively operate uh almost as a sort [39:10] of parallel society. [39:12] I I don't know whether it's quite the [39:13] same here, whether you've got the [39:14] similar thing with the Somalies in in [39:16] Minnesota. I I [39:17] >> you do in Dearbornne, Michigan. [39:19] Dearbornne, Michigan just had a gigantic [39:21] Islamic parade where you just see tens [39:24] of thousands of people holding flags and [39:26] walking on the street and [39:28] >> yeah, [39:29] >> it's kind of crazy. It's crazy. And [39:31] they've also one of the things that's [39:33] funny about Dearbornne is uh all the [39:36] progressives, it's very liberal place. [39:37] They're like, "Welcome, welcome. [39:39] Everyone's welcome for all cultures." [39:40] And as soon as they got into power, they [39:43] banned the pride flag. [39:45] That was the first thing they did. [39:47] >> Well, I'm I'm afraid they they they they [39:49] have quite strong views on on on on that [39:52] sort of thing. [39:53] >> Oh, yeah. That's why Yeah. queers for [39:54] Palestine is always hilarious. Like, and [39:56] then you see the meme Palestine for [39:58] queers and it's throwing people off [39:59] roofs. [40:00] >> It's like the champ who runs our Green [40:03] Party uh uh is a a gay Jew. So, I mean, [40:06] he, you know, again, he's going to have [40:08] a problem uh if these guys get anywhere [40:10] near power, but uh that doesn't seem to [40:13] put the progressives off. They still [40:14] seem to be, [40:15] >> but this is what's crazy is that their [40:17] society is complete, like Islamic [40:19] society is completely patriarchal. Um [40:23] the women are absolutely secondass [40:26] citizens. They're they have completely [40:28] different laws for how the women can [40:30] dress. What happens to the woman if [40:32] someone has sex with if someone has [40:35] first of all if they commit adultery [40:37] they could be killed [40:38] >> stoned to death to death. Yeah. And I I [40:41] w [40:42] >> it's watch a horrible video where a [40:44] father did it to his daughter. [40:46] >> Yes. Well you you you you do get these [40:48] killings. [40:48] >> Honor killings. Honor [40:49] >> killings. Yeah. Or brothers. The brother [40:51] will kill the daughter if the daughter [40:53] shamed the family. It's like hey guys [40:56] how are you progressive when you're [40:58] supporting this? And it's because the [41:00] concept of not being racist, not being [41:02] called racist, the fear of that is so [41:04] strong. They're they're willing to adopt [41:06] all sorts of things that are the [41:08] complete antithesis of everything they [41:10] believe in. [41:10] >> Well, in the UK, I don't know if you [41:12] have it here, but the Me Too movement, [41:13] it always [41:15] it it fascinates me that they never seem [41:18] to say anything about these what I call [41:20] clanish tribal cultures who have a [41:22] completely different view of women. And [41:24] and to your point, you know, again in [41:26] our report, uh a woman, if she accuses [41:30] in Pakistan a man of rape, [41:34] uh she has to have four male witnesses [41:39] who actually have to witness and swear [41:42] that they've seen her being penetrated [41:44] by the rapist. And you've actually got [41:46] women in prison because if she can't [41:50] prove that she's been raped under those [41:52] rules, then she can be sent to prison. [41:55] And there are many women languishing in [41:57] Pakistani prisons for that very reason. [42:01] And this is the sort of extraordinary [42:04] cultural oil and water which just [42:06] doesn't mix. It's also the mental [42:08] gymnastics that you have to have to [42:10] accept that as a part of Britain and [42:13] because you're progressive is really [42:16] crazy. It just shows how these [42:18] ideologies, these cultlike ideologies [42:21] can completely defy logic, completely [42:24] defy common sense, and just you have a [42:27] set of rules that you're supposed to [42:29] adhere to. You if you deviate from those [42:31] rules, you're a racist. You don't want [42:33] to be a racist, right? Then everyone's [42:35] welcome. [42:36] as you say, it's it's honor killings. [42:38] It's tribal. It's your first loyalty is [42:41] to your your tribe and your family, [42:44] >> not to your host country who's who's [42:46] actually got their own laws. Uh there [42:49] are all sorts of uh uh hadith rulings [42:53] which they can uh they can use to [42:56] justify it. I mean, for instance, if [42:58] they rape a a white girl, that doesn't [43:02] count in their in their view of life as [43:05] adultery. [43:07] So, they are effectively uh taught that [43:10] a girl who doesn't dress as they would [43:12] dress is is meat to be abused. And and [43:17] they have these they have these uh [43:19] extraordinary sort of cultural views. [43:22] you you see [43:23] >> that are completely incompatible in my [43:25] view with a with a with a society like [43:27] ours where you know we are a matriarchal [43:30] society which respects women I think we [43:33] have grown to respect women obviously [43:35] they had they've now got an omnipotent [43:38] position within our society certainly in [43:39] the UK I'm sure it's true here too and [43:42] quite right they they play a part in our [43:44] society they're very very important part [43:46] of everything but again uh uh under you [43:50] know the the the the Islamic code. I [43:53] think that the Muslims are frightened of [43:55] of female sexuality. It's it's all it's [43:58] all there. And as you know, you get FGM [44:01] female uh genital mutilation. So uh [44:05] these these cultures I think Joe and to [44:08] your point are just incompatible unless [44:11] you have a very strong uh government [44:14] which basically protects its electorate [44:18] from any subversive behavior which is [44:20] not compatible with our values. [44:22] >> You keep using the term meat. Is that [44:24] how they actually refer to it as? [44:26] >> That's that's that's what that's how [44:28] they consider it. Yeah. [44:28] >> What do they say? like how how are they? [44:30] That's it's in it's in our report that [44:32] that's uh that there was actually I [44:34] think it was I think it was [44:36] >> is it a translation of [44:37] >> I think Thomas Jefferson actually it's [44:39] in our report asked the Barbaru [44:42] pirates about about the way in which [44:44] they treated their their slaves and [44:46] their women that was particularly sla [44:48] slaves they just also slavery is is is [44:50] is accepted within within uh Islamic [44:54] countries so so I think they have their [44:57] own codes they have their own terms of [44:59] reference And there is a quote in there. [45:02] I I I'd have to look at the report to to [45:04] give it to you, but where one of them [45:06] does liken [45:09] uh uh white girls not dressing as as [45:12] Muslim girls dress and he does liken it [45:15] to meat [45:17] >> Jesus. [45:18] >> And and and and you know that that is an [45:21] analogy he used. So I mean yeah I think [45:23] I think that's what they think. this. [45:26] So, this rape gang inquiry report that [45:29] you have just released, the the number I [45:33] want you to say it because it sounds so [45:35] crazy. If I say it, people it's it's [45:37] going to sound wrong. What the number of [45:40] people that were victims, the estimate? [45:42] >> Well, we've estimated that a minimum of [45:44] a quarter of a million uh uh rapes have [45:47] taken place. It's it's it's probably [45:49] much much more Joe [45:51] >> because because because we've published [45:53] in here I think it's a list of 147 [45:56] >> parts of the UK where this is happening. [45:57] Now the government tries to tell you [45:58] it's happening in Rodale you know one or [46:01] two Bradford one or two centers and [46:04] that's why their statutory inquiry the [46:06] terms of reference of that have now been [46:07] downgraded so they make it look as if [46:10] it's not a systemic problem but just a a [46:12] little local problem which it isn't. So, [46:16] we've we've listed here and they're all [46:18] in here the places where we know it's [46:20] happening from our rape gang inquiry. [46:23] But every every time we publish this, [46:24] Joe, I I get people emailing us or [46:28] sending us messages on social media to [46:30] say, "What about Red Ruth in Cornwall? [46:32] What about it's happening here, it's [46:34] happening here, it's happening here." [46:36] So, I I think it's incredibly widespread [46:39] and and there's, you know, other people [46:41] who've corroborated that quarter of a [46:42] million figure. That's an incredibly [46:44] conservative figure. You can't be exact [46:47] because the state is not collecting the [46:49] data which they should be doing and [46:51] we've been lobbying in parliament to [46:53] make sure that the state's collection of [46:55] the data improves and then we can [46:58] actually see the extent of the problem [47:00] and you can actually pinpoint it uh in [47:02] the same way that we've done it in this [47:04] report. So, so this is I think it's [47:07] linked to organized crime. I think it's [47:10] linked to the drug trade. Uh I'm I'm [47:12] pretty sure it's linked to the drug [47:14] trade and and obviously it's linked to [47:16] prostitution. So So as usual with an [47:20] evil like this and you've got girls who [47:22] are transported round in the back of [47:25] pickups uh uh uh and and and in cages uh [47:30] and and at our rape gang inquiry, we had [47:32] examples of girls who were raped by dogs [47:36] uh and filmed uh either anally raped or [47:39] or or vaginally raped. uh and literally [47:42] watched, filmed, and and a lot of it's [47:44] about servitude and about, you know, [47:48] there's other stories in here about [47:49] women having to lick the face the feet [47:52] of their of their rapists. It it's it's [47:56] about power. It's about servitude. And [47:58] it's about the fact that Muslim men are [48:02] taught to believe that they are superior [48:05] not only to women, but they're superior [48:08] to people like yourself and myself who [48:11] are considered to be uh uh uh uh if you [48:15] like the the infidels and and their job [48:18] is to effectively spread uh uh Islam uh [48:25] and effectively punish the infidel And [48:28] and as you probably know in the [48:29] Crusades, if you lost to Saladin and you [48:32] were a Knights Templar, a crusader, you [48:35] you had two choices. You either [48:37] converted to Islam or they killed you. [48:40] And and in in the in the case of a lot [48:42] of these girls, a lot of them were made [48:47] pregnant. They were they were [48:48] impregnated and and they then had to [48:51] convert to Islam. [48:53] uh some of them were trafficked to Saudi [48:55] Arabia uh uh Pakistan, other parts of [48:58] the world. So look, I mean this this is [49:01] a massive national scandal and and I I'm [49:04] hoping now I'm an MP. We've written this [49:07] report and this should stimulate debate. [49:10] I we sent a copy of this on a PDF to [49:12] every MP and we're going to send this [49:15] printed copy to to all of them as well [49:17] because everybody in power should look [49:20] at this and they should start to correct [49:22] it immediately. [49:24] >> You you you use the term the term is [49:26] used rape gang. Why why are you saying [49:29] gang and this is an organized practice? [49:32] >> Yes. Yes. [49:33] >> It's not it's not as simple as Islamic [49:35] men are raping poor white girls. It's [49:38] that they go out in gangs specifically [49:40] for this purpose. [49:42] >> They these are properly organized gangs [49:45] who are grooming and abusing young girls [49:49] as young as 10 or 11 and then literally [49:53] trafficking them around the country. We [49:55] know that from from from the testimonies [49:57] we've had. So originally when I went [50:00] into parliament I was I was late elected [50:02] late. So I was elected in in July 24. [50:06] Uh so at the tender age of 67. So I so I [50:10] I we we heard them being referred to as [50:13] Asian grooming gangs which I think is a [50:17] misnomer because it's unfair on for [50:20] instance the Japanese or other other [50:22] other Asian cultures who don't do this. [50:26] >> So when we [50:28] thanks to Elon Musk we actually did and [50:30] and as you're quite right thanks to him [50:32] giving us a free speech platform and and [50:34] Facebook's thankfully followed as well. [50:35] So he's led the charge through his [50:37] purchase of of of what was Twitter. So [50:40] when I got into I gave a speech in [50:42] parliament uh where I didn't I said [50:45] they're not Asian grooming gangs. I'm [50:47] going to call them what they are. [50:49] They're Pakistani Muslim rape gangs. So [50:52] I said this in parliament. So uh Jamie [50:55] will be drag it up if if he goes on to [50:56] the you know because everything goes [50:58] into Hansard. Uh and I gave this speech [51:00] and it caused shock in in in in the [51:03] House of Commons. Now look, I'm I'm not [51:06] the smartest kid on the block, but what [51:08] I do in parliament is I tell the truth. [51:10] So, you know, I'm only interested in [51:12] telling the truth and getting to the [51:14] truth and changing the way in which we [51:15] govern. That's what I've gone into [51:16] parliament for. You know, I I haven't [51:19] gone into this. I give my parliamentary [51:20] salary to charity. You know, I'm a [51:23] reasonably successful uh person who's [51:26] lived his life. I' I've been chairman of [51:28] a football club. I don't know if you're [51:29] interested in Premier League football, [51:30] but I was chairman of Southampton. So, I [51:32] built the stadium for Southampton. I [51:34] used to play competitive hockey. Uh and [51:36] I and I built up the youth academy in [51:38] Southampton. You I loved the best day of [51:40] my life was when we got to the cup final [51:41] in 2003. We lost one nil to Arsenal. But [51:45] it was the most amazing experience for [51:47] everybody. So look, I I'm not doing this [51:50] because I I I want necessarily to be [51:52] doing it. I'm doing because somebody's [51:53] got to do it. And if we're going to [51:55] change Britain, we've got to get the [51:59] public to buy into what we're doing. And [52:01] as I say, I'm not a classic politician. [52:03] And I'm not saying you've got to vote [52:05] for me. I'm saying that we've got to [52:08] change Britain by 29 or I think the [52:10] country from what I can see is in [52:13] terminal decline. So I sit on the public [52:15] accounts committee. I see the waste. I [52:17] see the unaccountability. I see the way [52:19] in which the civil service does not [52:21] serve the people which is supposed to [52:23] serve. I see our debt rising to nearly [52:26] 100% of GDP. I see massive uh uh [52:30] misallocation of procurement on our on [52:32] our weapons. I see fraud in the [52:34] judiciary. I see all the things that [52:37] >> Sounds like you're talking about [52:38] America. [52:38] >> Well, I'm talking about I'm talking [52:40] about Britain a moment, Joe. But [52:43] >> seems like it's a widespread problem. [52:44] >> Well, I actually I actually think [52:46] America uh under Joe Biden probably was [52:49] was as bad as that. And if you look at [52:51] what you know Elon and the boys [52:53] uncovered with with with US aid and and [52:56] and all of all the misallocation of [52:58] taxpayer funds all over the world, a lot [53:00] of it to England, some of it came to [53:02] woke woke causes in England. [53:04] >> Mhm. So look, whoever the architects of [53:07] this are, whether it's the World [53:09] Economic Forum, whoever they are, [53:10] whether it's the Bilderbergers, whether [53:12] it's the Council on Foreign Relations, [53:14] whether it's whatever malign influence [53:16] is trying to do this, we we have to [53:19] collectively try and reverse it. So I'm [53:21] I'm saying to people, if you want, I [53:24] will do my damnedest to reverse it. You [53:26] know, I've run multiple businesses. Uh, [53:28] I was in the city of London for 20 [53:29] years, so I know about finance, and I [53:32] will commit to doing whatever I can to [53:36] reverse this for the British people. But [53:38] they've got they've got to buy into it, [53:39] Joe. They've got to buy into it. [53:40] >> Are there people that are in denial that [53:42] this is happening, that this rape gang [53:45] problem is real? [53:46] >> Oh, without a shadow of a doubt. Labor [53:48] >> and what what do they say? [53:49] >> Well, Labour just tries to look the [53:52] other way. [53:52] >> But when confronted, when confronted by [53:55] the numbers, what is their response? [53:56] Well, we've been demanding a statutory [53:58] inquiry. Uh, and in the end, we [54:00] crowdfunded this, [54:02] >> right? What is their response to that? [54:03] >> Well, their response to this has been [54:04] pretty muted to be frank. I mean, the [54:06] BBC haven't covered it at all. [54:08] >> Really, [54:08] >> a national monopolistic broadcaster paid [54:12] for by a compulsory fee have not covered [54:15] this as a as a matter of public [54:18] interest. nor of Sky uh nor of nor [54:22] properly of the Daily Telegraph. GB news [54:24] have covered a tiny Patrick Christ [54:27] covered one evening of it. Now this this [54:29] is a massive national scandal that [54:32] deserves complete a complete and utter [54:35] airing. [54:35] >> How does the BBC justify not discussing [54:39] this? [54:40] >> Well, the BBC BBC is part of our [54:42] problem, Joe. So to to your point about [54:44] you know the Democrats the BBC is a [54:46] deeply malign organization. So it was [54:50] set up uh to inform, educate and [54:52] entertain. And it was set up by a man [54:54] called Rereath in in and and Rereath was [54:57] a highly principled man. And I think at [54:59] the time it was set up in in in the 20s, [55:01] it was it probably uh did have a role. [55:06] But in the digital age where most of the [55:09] young people no longer watch [55:11] uh uh their news on the BBC, they get [55:14] their news from whatever their favorite [55:16] news channel is. whether it's Breitbart [55:18] or to whoever whoever they go and get it [55:19] from, they get it from somewhere else. [55:21] But if you want to watch sport or you [55:23] want to, you know, basically have your [55:26] TV, you have to pay the TV license. [55:28] >> This episode is sponsored by BetterHelp. [55:31] Summer is great, isn't it? It's the [55:33] perfect season for adventures, but it [55:35] can also be pretty exhausting juggling [55:37] chaotic schedules and trying to make the [55:40] most of summer. That's why it's [55:42] important to take a moment for you. Go [55:45] out for a weekend without planning [55:47] anything and just have fun. Or relax at [55:50] home. Or if you're really struggling, [55:53] try therapy with Better Help. With a [55:56] network of over 30,000 quality [55:59] therapists, they can connect you with [56:01] the right one, just like they have for [56:03] millions already across the globe. [56:06] Together, you can work out what you need [56:09] and how you can enjoy summer to the [56:12] fullest. You don't have to say yes to [56:14] everything this summer. Find support in [56:17] therapy. Sign up and get 10% off at [56:20] betterhelp.com/jre. [56:23] That's betterh elp.com/jre. [56:28] There's still an problem that I'm sure [56:31] exists in England just as exists in [56:33] America. There's a certain subset of our [56:34] society, a large percentage of our [56:36] society, particularly older people, that [56:39] things are not legitimate unless they're [56:41] discussed in corporate media and that if [56:44] it's not in the New York Times, if it's [56:45] not on CNN, if it's not, you know, fill [56:47] in the blank, then it can't be [56:49] completely legitimate. It has to be a [56:52] fringe thing. It has to be a conspiracy [56:54] thing. They still need these what these [56:58] sort of legacy establishments to give [57:00] them the news because that has been the [57:02] way they grew up. That has been how they [57:04] were trained and in their mind they [57:06] don't understand the internet [57:07] completely. They don't go on Twitter and [57:10] so all that stuff to them is just it's [57:12] just too fringe. [57:14] >> So that that's always going to be a [57:16] problem. And if someone like the BBC [57:18] doesn't cover this stuff, it for a lot [57:22] of people that are woefully ignorant, [57:25] they can still kind of claim that [57:27] ignorance and dismiss it because the BBC [57:29] isn't covering it. [57:30] >> That's exactly right. I mean, that's a [57:32] that's a very good summary because the [57:34] BBC historically was totally trusted and [57:38] and their news bulletins were designed, [57:41] as I say, to be impartial completely. [57:44] and and being a public sector [57:45] broadcaster, their job was to cover [57:48] matters like this and and create debate. [57:50] But as we know uh monopolies go bad. I [57:54] mean monopolies in my view are generally [57:57] a bad thing particularly in the digital [57:58] age where you know thanks to Elon Musk [58:02] and and and what he did with with X I I [58:04] think he has released uh free speech. I [58:07] think he has uh uh returned some sort of [58:10] semblance of of of people's ability to [58:13] be able to force debate without being [58:17] bullied by a monopoly like the BBC. [58:19] >> So, so if I ever get near power, I will [58:22] responsibly defund the BBC is one of the [58:24] first things I do. I think the BBC is is [58:27] dripping poison into the veins of [58:29] Britain every day. [58:30] >> What other examples of what the BBC is [58:33] doing you think is dripping poison? [58:35] Well, I think a lot of their coverage is [58:37] is is not objective. It's woke. I mean, [58:40] they're into all this DEI. They're into [58:43] uh uh obviously the LGBTQ plus. They're [58:46] into all of the all of the things which [58:49] I think we as we said earlier probably [58:51] came from this uh Democrat period, but [58:55] it's been happening for a long time. I I [58:57] think if you look at the Labour Party, [58:59] again, I don't know if you've ever heard [59:01] of the Fabian Society. [59:03] >> No. So the Fabian Society is uh was set [59:06] up in the in in the 1880s and it it was [59:09] basically most of the Labour front bench [59:12] and most of the Labour party are members [59:13] of the Fabian Society. So the Fabian [59:16] Society, George Bernard Shaw was a [59:18] member of the FA Fabian Society. You [59:20] you'll have heard of George Bernard [59:21] Shaw. So he it's the most extraordinary [59:24] organization that their emblem is a wolf [59:26] in sheep's clothing. [59:28] >> As if as if as if that doesn't tell you [59:31] what they're doing. [59:31] >> That's their emblem. So, [59:33] >> can I see what that looks like? [59:34] >> That's their emblem. It's a wolf in [59:35] sheep's clothing. [59:36] >> Fabian Society. [59:37] >> The Fabian Society. [59:39] >> I need to see that. [59:39] >> You should have a look at that. [59:40] >> I might have to get a t-shirt. [59:41] >> Should I tell you what else they were? [59:42] >> I need a t-shirt. [59:43] >> Should I tell you what else they were? [59:45] They were eugenicists originally. [59:47] >> Whoa. [59:47] >> Yes. [59:48] >> When? [59:48] >> Well, [59:49] >> how far back? [59:49] >> Bernard George Bernard. [59:51] >> That That is damn crazy. [59:54] >> Well, everyone should look at the Fabian [59:56] Sy because that runs deep through the [59:57] veins of [59:58] >> That is damn crazy. [60:00] >> What do you think of that? That is damn [60:02] crazy. So ladies and gentlemen, if [60:04] you're just listening to this, this [60:05] Fabian Society coat of arms is really a [60:09] black wolf that has a sheep's body [60:12] strapped on top of its back and it's [60:15] like covering its This is insane. [60:18] That's crazy. [60:21] That what a what a complete disdain for [60:25] anybody else's intelligence. [60:28] Like they're not even trying to hide it. [60:31] They're just like [60:31] >> they're all members. The front bench are [60:33] all members of the Fabian Society. So So [60:35] >> that that code of arms [60:36] >> K Star is also a member. [60:38] >> I need a t-shirt, Jamie. Please order [60:39] it. [60:39] >> You you want you want to hold you want a [60:42] Fabian Society t-shirt? [60:43] >> Yeah. Just for a goof. I think it would [60:45] be hilarious. [60:46] >> But no, so that's that runs through the [60:48] Labor Party. So that's all part of it. [60:50] So I I think the agenda has been to your [60:53] point, they in infiltrated our education [60:56] system. Uh, and you know, I'm proud of [60:59] our history. I mean, Britain uh stopped [61:02] the slave trade. It cost us a fortune. [61:04] Uh, we did it uh almost unilaterally. [61:08] And you know, we I think on the whole [61:10] have been a force for good in the world. [61:12] Not bad. I I I'm I'm proud to say that. [61:14] I've studied a lot of history. Uh I [61:16] think there are many other cultures, [61:18] probably the Belgians and and the French [61:20] who are far more brutal than us with the [61:22] with their with their colonies. So I [61:24] think we've tended to leave a legacy [61:26] where we've tried to instill the rule of [61:29] law. Look at India. Look look at a lot [61:31] of the other countries that we we we we [61:33] were involved with. Uh they're now [61:35] flourishing because of the I think the [61:37] structures that we left in place. And [61:39] it's very sad to watch us almost turning [61:42] in on ourselves and and having left the [61:45] legacy in other countries. We we [61:48] ourselves have lost sight of what of of [61:50] what we should be doing. It's just it's [61:53] really extraordinary seeing the [61:54] perspective of a lot of young people [61:56] that are very impressionable that come [61:57] out of universities and have an utter [62:01] complete disdain for these successful [62:04] societies. And instead of looking at [62:06] these successful societies and saying, [62:09] "Well, yeah, people were really terrible [62:10] in the past, but this is a pretty good [62:12] example of how people should be treated [62:15] equally today." No, it's not perfect, [62:18] but it's progressing in a better [62:21] direction than it was in the past, [62:22] right? Instead, they look to the past [62:24] and everything is built on this horrible [62:26] history of outrageous, atrocious acts [62:29] and therefore it must be punished [62:31] currently and all the people that [62:33] benefited from it, specifically white [62:34] people, need to be cast out. They need [62:38] to be silenced. They multiculturalism is [62:41] the only way to go. Complete open [62:43] borders. like the the way they look at [62:46] things is like how do you think these [62:48] countries got so good? Like what do you [62:51] what do you think is about America or [62:53] about England about any of these [62:54] countries that leads them to be where [62:56] they are today? Well, it's a long [62:59] history of progress, a long history. And [63:03] along the way, yeah, like especially [63:06] when you go back hundreds of years ago, [63:07] people were terrible. They were [63:09] terrible everywhere. You know, humans [63:10] are just getting better at being people. [63:13] like pretty recently. But to throw it [63:15] all out and abandon it and to think that [63:18] socialism is going to fix you, like do [63:20] you guys read anything? There's not a [63:23] single example of that, not turning to [63:25] tyranny. And their their take on it is [63:28] always it hasn't been done correctly. [63:30] And that is so wild that people are [63:32] still willing to swallow that. And the [63:34] only thing that makes sense is they've [63:36] been indoctrinated through universities [63:38] to think this way because nowhere in the [63:41] real world do you think that equality of [63:43] outcome ever makes any sense because [63:45] everybody realizes somewhere along the [63:47] line when you get your first job, when [63:48] you're a kid, when you're going through [63:49] school, when you're playing sports, [63:51] there's not a quality of effort. There's [63:53] never a quality of effort and there's [63:55] always some people that want to put in [63:57] more effort and they put in more thought [63:59] and more focus and they get further and [64:02] you know, oh well they're over [64:04] all these other people. Are you sure [64:06] that's everything? Cuz it seems like [64:08] it's not. And it seems like as soon as [64:10] you remove any incentive to succeed, [64:13] then you don't have any of the amazing [64:15] stuff that you have around you all the [64:16] time. the reason why you have beautiful [64:19] televisions and Starlink and all the [64:22] it's capitalism. It's that you have to [64:24] incentivize people to create these [64:26] things. [64:26] >> Yeah. [64:27] >> It doesn't mean the only way to do it is [64:29] to other people over. That's not [64:31] correct. It can be done correctly. It [64:33] could be done humanely. It can be done [64:35] wisely. You could vote with your [64:37] dollars. You could, you know, boycott [64:39] companies that do things that you don't [64:41] think are ethical. There's all sorts of [64:42] wonderful ways that capitalism could be [64:44] used and you can sort of influence [64:46] things the right direction, but to throw [64:48] it all out and say we've got to go [64:50] socialism like oh boy, I can't believe [64:54] people are buying that. I just I that to [64:56] me is one of the real problems with not [64:58] allowing conservative voices in [65:00] universities and that these universities [65:03] especially in the United States are a [65:05] lot of especially like in sociology, [65:08] psychology and the overwhelmingly [65:12] liberal like surely there's got to be [65:14] some historians out there that are [65:16] conservative and they would have a [65:18] different perspective and it might be [65:20] good to have diversity of opinion as [65:24] well as diversity diversity of national [65:25] origin as well as diversity of gender as [65:28] well as diversity of sexual orientation. [65:30] Yeah, all that stuff's great, but also [65:32] diversity of opinion. Like the only way [65:34] to know whether or not this person is [65:36] making sense is to have someone who [65:39] completely disagrees that has a better [65:40] point go up against them and you watch [65:42] them duke it out. And as soon as you [65:44] silence all that because students don't [65:46] feel safe or because, you know, this is [65:48] promoting X, Y, and Z, this person's a [65:51] Nazi. Oh, they're a Nazi, we can't let [65:53] them on the As soon as you do that, you [65:56] ruin the whole thing that a university [65:57] is supposed to be doing. Supposed to be [65:59] preparing young minds for discourse and [66:02] for communicating and for figuring out [66:04] the world on their own. They're [66:05] eventually going to be independent and [66:07] dependent entirely on their own actions [66:09] and decisions. And go out there in the [66:11] world, figure out your way. arm them [66:13] correctly. And the way to do that is to [66:16] expose them to all sorts of different [66:18] competing ideas. The idea that that was [66:20] ever accepted to be shut down in this [66:22] country, especially in America, is a [66:24] massive failure of the education system. [66:26] Just massive. If you think that someone [66:28] has bad points, come up with better [66:31] points and let them duke it out. And [66:32] don't pull fire alarms and don't silence [66:35] them and don't scream and protest and [66:37] throw things at them. Communicate. This [66:40] is what the And anybody who doesn't do [66:41] that should be shunned. [66:43] >> I agree. [66:43] >> If you if you're one of those people [66:45] that says, "No, you can't talk to Nazis [66:47] like shun them. Shun." They are the [66:49] enemy of thinking. They are the enemy of [66:52] progress. They are the enemy of finding [66:54] out what's right and what's wrong. And [66:55] the only way we find that out is we [66:57] communicate. [66:58] >> Free speech. [66:59] >> Free speech. Well, free speech and a [67:02] degree of Darwinism. You have to have a [67:04] what we have in the UK now is, I always [67:06] say, reverse Darwinian theory. And again [67:09] at schools now in my day I was lucky we [67:12] we we we like to win to win was good to [67:15] win fairly in a in a proper game of [67:17] hockey or rugby or whatever was great [67:20] but now in schools winning is is [67:23] considered to be bad. So everybody needs [67:26] to have an opportunity to be treated the [67:28] same [67:28] >> in sports [67:29] >> often often in sport to win to be seen [67:31] as a as a competitive winner. [67:33] >> You guys don't have wrestling over here. [67:35] >> We don't have wrestling. I know you do. [67:36] You do. It's a real problem. cage [67:38] fighting and stuff, don't you? [67:39] >> I know, but I mean, wrestling, just [67:40] wrestling as a sport, just wrestling for [67:42] high school and college, it's like [67:44] wrestlers understand mecracy as good as [67:47] any human being alive because there's no [67:51] way to make it unless you work hard. [67:53] >> But isn't this the battle Joe J, the [67:55] age-old battle between individualism and [67:58] collectivism? Yes. [67:59] >> Because the collective [68:01] >> uh likes to curb the individual. I I [68:04] like to foster the individual and I [68:06] think what what the state fears most is [68:10] highly successful independent-minded [68:13] people who are capable of putting their [68:15] point of view uh and discussing it with [68:18] each other. So what they try and do [68:20] through the taxation in the UK what [68:22] they're doing is they're taxing to your [68:25] point people who contribute who work [68:26] hard and there are still a lot of people [68:28] who fight very hard to feed their [68:31] families. They're proud. They don't want [68:33] to be part of this welfareism. You know, [68:35] they want to provide and they work hard, [68:38] but the state puts everything in their [68:40] way. All the regulations, the rules, the [68:43] taxes, everything is everything is the [68:46] force is not with them. And that's got [68:49] to be wrong. I mean what you what I [68:51] think what you need is a lot of [68:52] successful individual family businesses [68:56] uh communities which are self-sufficient [68:58] communities that respect each other and [69:00] and and and effectively uh can have this [69:03] debate with each other you get at the [69:05] truth and I and I think as a result of [69:07] that most of the best inventions have [69:10] come from you know the UK the US from [69:13] the Anglo-Saxon world where [69:15] individualism when it's allowed to [69:17] flourish does a lot of good for mankind. [69:20] And to your point, I I think this is [69:21] what's been undermined by these [69:24] >> what I call central planners. [69:26] >> And a lot of these great inventions in [69:27] America have come from people that [69:29] immigrated legally from other countries [69:30] because they appreciated what America [69:32] stood for and they really wanted to make [69:34] something happen and they couldn't do it [69:35] wherever they were. [69:36] >> Well, the extraordinary thing in the UK [69:37] is we've got a lot of support from [69:39] people who are immigrants into the UK. [69:42] They came to Britain because they [69:44] respected our structures and what they [69:47] want is they want structure. They don't [69:48] want to see the country. [69:49] >> Yes. Legal immigrants in America have [69:51] the same perspective. Legal immigrants [69:53] in America are pretty overwhelmingly [69:55] against the whole open border idea [69:57] because it took was so hard for them to [69:59] become an American citizen. It's a very [70:01] proud moment for them to do it. Like [70:02] >> a lot of young people got a lot of [70:04] support from young people who are [70:06] >> again young people are online. See this [70:08] is the thing like so young people are [70:10] much more [70:12] I want to say informed but at least [70:14] aware of the issue. They're much more [70:16] aware of things than older people that [70:18] are just again reading the newspaper and [70:21] watching television. [70:22] >> But don't don't you think is it maybe [70:23] the same here in Britain? A lot of the [70:26] wealth is tied up in what I call the [70:28] baby boomers. So I'm a sort of tail end [70:30] boomer because I'm 68 but the sort of [70:32] bulk of them are probably 70 to 90 and a [70:36] lot of the pension wealth is held there [70:38] and and a lot of the damage that's been [70:40] done to our financial markets has come [70:43] from aversion to risk. Risk is a good [70:46] thing in my opinion. So people need to [70:47] take risk. Risk uh you know the [70:50] entrepreneur takes risk and he gets [70:52] reward if he gets it right. But if you [70:54] tax him into oblivion he doesn't take [70:55] the risk. And what's happened in Britain [70:57] is the baby boomers, the wealth's all [70:59] locked up there. They want to see their [71:02] retirement through safely. And not [71:04] enough money is cascading down to the [71:06] young people to be able to build their [71:08] lives in the same way that the boomers [71:10] were given a chance to to make money in [71:12] in this very uh uh [71:14] >> when you say not enough money is [71:16] cascading down, like how so? What's the [71:18] bottom? the money is all locked up when [71:20] with these old baby boomers and they're [71:22] more concerned with their pensions and [71:24] their retirement than they are with [71:26] generating an ongoing wealth chain which [71:29] gives an opportunity for the young to be [71:31] involved. [71:31] >> So meaning they're not starting [71:32] businesses. [71:33] >> No, very much not. [71:34] >> They're just holding on to their money. [71:36] >> They're holding on to their money. [71:37] >> So that's just that's an England thing [71:39] >> in England. Definitely. I mean I I think [71:41] it's a big issue. I don't know whether [71:42] it's an issue here. Is it an issue here? [71:44] Well, there's certainly an issue here [71:45] with uh young people feeling like the [71:48] system is completely rigged. Um cost of [71:51] housing is through the roof. Uh rent is [71:54] through the roof. Uh groceries are more [71:56] expensive. Inflation here is a giant [71:59] problem. It's a giant problem for people [72:00] that are struggling. We were just [72:01] looking at something the other day uh on [72:04] the internet where it was talking about [72:07] a number uh a finan a number from what [72:10] was it like 2007 or 2008 or something [72:14] like that was like $225,000 [72:16] and it's $450,000 in today. [72:19] >> Like that's crazy. Yeah. [72:21] >> That's like 20 years ago. like to for to [72:24] have something double in 20 years. And [72:28] you just think about how many people [72:29] that are coming up that just feel like [72:31] AI is going to take all their jobs. So, [72:33] they don't know what to do and now [72:34] they're in student debt because you guys [72:36] have free education over there, which is [72:38] a wonderful thing. I mean, I completely [72:40] support that idea. But in America, these [72:43] kids get saddled down with debt that [72:45] they can't escape from. [72:46] >> Well, we don't in England, we don't have [72:47] free education. in in England. In [72:50] Scotland, they do cuz [72:51] >> Scotland has free education. We did used [72:53] to have it. You're quite right. But [72:55] >> when did it go away? [72:56] >> Well, now students have to take out [72:57] loans. And this is another shocking uh [73:01] uh uh [73:02] >> I thought you guys had free healthcare [73:03] and free education. [73:04] >> We have we have well, if you call it [73:06] free healthcare, assuming you can get a [73:08] doctor now because you you you know, [73:09] most people now are having to source [73:12] their own medical treatment because it [73:14] takes you so long to get an operation or [73:15] to get a doctor's appointment. It it [73:17] it's although the the sort of health [73:19] service was set up post war to provide [73:22] free health care when it becomes [73:24] incredibly inefficient people have to [73:26] seek their own care [73:28] >> otherwise they don't get treated [73:29] >> but but I look I think with student debt [73:32] now uh uh [73:34] >> when did it change where university [73:35] education [73:36] >> it's it's changed so so now [73:38] >> what year was this [73:40] >> uh well it's been changed for a long [73:41] time so so yeah yeah so my oldest son is [73:45] 35 So he took out a student loan. It was [73:49] less then and then the fees shot up. So [73:52] my [73:52] >> what's a like for Oxford? What's a [73:54] typical what? How much? [73:55] >> Well, they run up students will run up [73:57] debt of in the UK now it's not uncommon [74:00] to run up a debt of £60,000. [74:02] >> So it's very similar to what's going on [74:04] in America. [74:04] >> £60,000 and and they're charged the most [74:07] hideous rate of interest on it. [74:09] >> And do you have laws in terms of [74:11] bankruptcy over there? [74:12] >> We do have bankruptcy laws. Yeah. But do [74:14] you have bankruptcy? [74:16] >> Student debt, you won't be bankrupted [74:17] over student debt though because because [74:19] the student debt, they just acrue the [74:21] interest. Uh if you go and work in a [74:23] foreign country, uh often you don't have [74:26] to pay the student debt back. I think [74:28] it's a 30-year uh liability. But once [74:31] you start working, then the student debt [74:34] organization will take interest and [74:36] principle out of your salary. In [74:38] America, you they for if you go [74:40] bankrupt, they'll forgive credit card [74:42] debt, all sorts of other debt, but not [74:44] student loan. It's the one loan that you [74:46] cannot ever be forgiven from. In fact, [74:48] people who have social security in [74:50] America, their social security gets [74:52] docked because they owe student loans. [74:54] >> Is that right? I didn't know that. [74:56] >> I didn't know. [74:56] >> It's crazy. Imagine you're at the end of [74:58] your life, you're living on social [74:59] security, and they're taking pieces of [75:01] it for an education that clearly didn't [75:03] help you out. Well, I don't know about [75:05] you, but in England, we've got these [75:06] ridiculous courses in sort of humanities [75:09] and sort of things that are completely [75:11] obstruct. [75:12] >> Yeah. [75:12] >> And and these these these kids go and do [75:14] the the these these what I call [75:17] degrees. And at the end of the day, they [75:18] come out of it with a load of debt, [75:20] >> right? [75:21] >> And no real skills. [75:22] >> No skills and a and a completely [75:24] ideologically captured mind. [75:26] >> Very much so. [75:26] >> Yeah. It's um that's it's and there's [75:31] not a lot of other alternatives. It's [75:33] like most universities are left-leaning. [75:35] Yeah. You know, and that's that's the [75:36] issue that these kids have. you're even [75:38] if you're from a conservative family or [75:40] if kids grow up a certain way, send them [75:42] off to college and they're very [75:44] impressionable and they're going to get [75:46] talked down to by a professor who's a [75:48] communist who's never had a real job in [75:49] his life and he seems so smart and he's [75:52] very smug and he insults you if you [75:54] disagree with him and he is the ruler of [75:56] the classroom and everybody like like [75:59] little kids, they just give in to this [76:01] guy's ideas and next thing you know [76:03] you're you're organizing on school [76:06] grounds and you're doing all the st same [76:08] things that the other communists are [76:09] doing and you're you're part of the [76:11] team. Hey, we're a nice we're going to [76:13] fix the world and you don't realize how [76:16] ridiculous it is until like maybe you're [76:18] 35 and you have a job and then you have [76:20] a family and you're like what the [76:22] are we doing? Like what is this? [76:24] >> It does change, doesn't it? [76:25] >> Oh, 100%. [76:26] >> But the worst [76:28] show me a young man who who was that who [76:30] quoted that? Who was that quote from? [76:32] Show me a young man who's not a li. Was [76:35] it liberal or is it progressive or [76:37] whatever it is? Some show me a young man [76:39] who's not a liberal and I'll show you a [76:41] man without a heart. Show me an old man [76:42] who's not conservative and I'll show you [76:44] a man without a brain. [76:44] >> Yeah. No. Well, I don't know who said [76:46] that, but I it's it's a common saying. [76:49] >> Let's find out who said that. [76:51] >> It's It's a truism. [76:52] >> Churchill. [76:53] >> Was it Churchill? [76:54] >> There you go. One of your people. [76:56] >> Yeah. [76:57] >> Yeah. Brilliant. And and accurate. And [76:59] it doesn't being conservative doesn't [77:00] mean you're not kind. silly. It's just [77:02] recognition of human nature. And uh you [77:05] can't you can't reward people for not [77:09] putting in effort because then they will [77:11] find ways to not put in effort. You [77:12] can't reward people for being a quote [77:15] unquote victim. And I'm I don't mean a a [77:18] real victim of a crime. I mean [77:20] victimized by society, victimized by [77:22] circumstance, victim. You can't [77:24] weaponize that because people will cling [77:27] to it. They're people love excuses. [77:30] Anybody who does sports, you played [77:31] hockey, people love excuses. Nah, today [77:34] my back hurts. Today I don't feel up to [77:37] it. I'm a little tired. I can't do the [77:39] final lap. People love excuses. And when [77:42] you weaponize that and you give people [77:43] incentives to be excuses and then you [77:46] you put people on their heels like, [77:48] whoa, I don't want to appear that I'm [77:50] insensitive. Let's help you out. And [77:52] then all of a sudden you've got a whole [77:54] swath of society that has uh cart blanch [77:58] over your tax dollars for nonsense. [78:00] >> Well, this is this is obviously what's [78:02] happened in the UK. When I was brought [78:03] up again, [78:06] competition was a good thing. You know, [78:07] if you if you if you felt a bit rough, [78:09] you just carried on. You you didn't win. [78:12] You didn't moan. You expected to fight [78:14] for things. If you had a setback, you [78:16] didn't immediately go and cry into your [78:17] beer. You you basically got on with it. [78:20] Well, we need to teach people that that [78:22] that's it's character building. Like [78:24] you're going to have rough days and you [78:26] should cherish those rough days because [78:28] from them you will grow. You will grow [78:31] from your rough days. The the down times [78:33] are the good ones because those down [78:35] times really give you the motivation and [78:38] the the real firepower to get out of [78:40] whatever situation you're in and improve [78:42] your life. And from adversity comes [78:45] comes success. Yes. I think character [78:48] for sure. [78:48] >> Character and success. Yeah. [78:49] >> Yeah. character for sure. I mean, it [78:51] doesn't exist without some sort of [78:53] adversity. [78:54] >> But I do think I think the young were [78:56] also badly affected by the COVID by the [79:00] response to COVID. Joe, I I I think you [79:02] and I share something in common. I'm a [79:03] pure blood. I I haven't I didn't have [79:05] those. [79:05] >> Pure blood's hilarious. [79:06] >> I didn't have those I didn't have those [79:08] injections. I I wouldn't go anywhere [79:10] near them. [79:10] >> How did you get away with that in the [79:12] UK? [79:13] >> Well, I used to go to Australia a lot. [79:14] So So I because I have some businesses [79:16] in Perth in Western Australia. I I love [79:18] those old rocks in Western Australia, [79:21] you know, the mining, the the sort of [79:22] wild west and Calguri and places like [79:25] that, you know, um which have got a huge [79:27] historical uh connection to sort of gold [79:30] prospecting and stuff. So, I stopped [79:33] going. I stopped traveling because it [79:34] was very difficult to travel. But I I I [79:38] don't know about you, I found the [79:40] lockdown profoundly concerning. I [79:43] thought I thought things that I thought [79:45] were nor the norm I was losing [79:48] everything that made sense. [79:49] >> Yeah. [79:50] >> And you know there were things happening [79:52] that I didn't think could ever happen in [79:56] Britain. [79:57] uh you know the state literally took [79:59] over and it frightened people into [80:02] submission [80:03] >> America [80:04] >> and the young people suffered most [80:06] because [80:07] >> you they didn't have the opportunity to [80:09] socialize and to to your point discuss [80:13] ideas and and and and get at the truth. [80:15] They they were literally locked up. [80:18] >> Everything was online. It wasn't uh it [80:20] wasn't right. The whole thing was [80:22] completely wrong. And [80:23] >> yeah, imagine if you're in high school [80:24] in America and you're in California. [80:26] your entire senior year, you're you're [80:29] at home. You graduate, you can't even go [80:31] to a graduation because it's too [80:32] dangerous. [80:33] >> Yeah. [80:33] >> The the whole thing was madness. [80:35] >> Well, Sweden Sweden got it right. Anders [80:37] Taylor in Sweden, he he was he was a [80:38] great man. Very brave man. [80:40] >> And he got he got that right. [80:41] >> And boy, there was a lot of push back. [80:43] It was amazing how many people were [80:44] willing to do the work of the [80:46] government. How many citizens were [80:49] willing to enforce these ideas. It it [80:52] was really shocking. It was shocking to [80:54] watch how many people became lemmings. [80:56] How many people just stepped in line? [80:57] >> We had people ratting on each other. [80:59] >> Yeah. Oh, we did it because they were [81:01] rewarding people in Los Angeles. [81:03] >> Yeah. [81:03] >> They were giving them financial rewards [81:05] for telling on their neighbors that [81:06] we're having parties. [81:08] >> That's what happened in England. I I I I [81:10] have a tennis court in the middle of [81:11] nowhere. So, I used to say, "Come up and [81:13] play tennis." Cuz ridiculous to stop you [81:15] playing tennis outside. I mean, [81:17] absolutely mad. Anyway, they used to [81:19] come up and and play tennis. Uh and [81:22] nobody can see see it. If they played it [81:23] in the village, then people would report [81:26] each other. [81:26] >> Yeah. In California, we had people [81:28] report on us because this desk is not [81:30] six feet wide. [81:32] >> Seriously? [81:32] >> Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And then [81:34] they uh also said we were talking close [81:36] to each other without masks because [81:38] there was a bunch of people that saw [81:40] people walk in to the studio and we [81:42] shook their hand so they were ratting on [81:44] us. And so we had to put a sign up in [81:46] the front door of the studio and we had [81:48] to have a bag of masks. a whole bag of [81:51] M. Do we have to have hand sanitizer, [81:53] too? Did we have that, too? [81:54] >> Probably. [81:55] >> I think so. I think we had to have hand [81:56] sanitizer for a while at least. But we [81:59] were getting ratted on because this desk [82:01] is too close. So, it's not This desk's [82:04] only 5t wide, so it's no social [82:06] distancing. [82:07] >> It's pathetic, Joe, isn't it? [82:09] >> It was nonsense. It was It was so crazy. [82:12] The whole thing made no sense. And uh it [82:15] completely changed a lot of people's [82:16] ideas about um trusting experts and [82:21] trusting authority. [82:23] So many people thought that the health [82:24] experts in this country were literally [82:27] just trying to make people healthy and [82:29] you didn't realize like, oh no, no, no, [82:31] no. They're trying to prop up the [82:32] pharmaceutical drug cartel and they're [82:34] trying to make as much money as humanly [82:36] possible and the only way to do that is [82:37] to force compliance. And so they will do [82:40] whatever they can. They will keep you [82:41] from flying. They'll keep you from [82:42] driving. that keep you from going to [82:43] school. You can't work. If you have a [82:45] more than 100 employees, everyone has to [82:47] get vaccinated. They were doing crazy [82:49] where you're like, you guys are [82:51] really going for it. And it worked. It [82:54] worked for quite a while, but boy did it [82:55] ruin young people's perspective of [82:59] authority [83:00] >> completely. [83:00] >> They don't trust anybody anymore. And [83:02] with good reason. [83:04] >> Well, I think it damaged them most. [83:06] Again, it's another negative for them. I [83:08] mean, our national health service was [83:09] forcing people to have the inject. You [83:10] had to work in the National Health [83:12] Service, you had to have the jabs. [83:14] >> Yeah. And it didn't work. [83:15] >> It didn't work. [83:16] >> That's what's crazy. [83:17] >> Actually, worse than that, Joe. It [83:18] didn't work. It created major medical [83:20] problems. Right. [83:20] >> And I I don't personally think we've [83:22] seen the end of it yet. So, I've got a [83:24] lot of friends who are fit. They they [83:25] ended up having myocarditis, having [83:27] strokes, [83:28] >> having heart attacks. And at the end of [83:30] the day, [83:31] >> everybody knows somebody that has a [83:33] horrible reaction to it. [83:34] >> Everybody does. [83:35] >> Yeah. Everyone. And to people that say [83:37] they don't, I've had conversations with [83:38] people. I don't know anybody who had a [83:39] side effect. I'm like, you for [83:42] lying. There's no way that's possible. [83:44] Unless you are the luckiest person in [83:46] the world and you have a extremely small [83:49] social circle and out of that social [83:51] circle, no one had a bad reaction that [83:53] which is very unlikely. Unless that's [83:56] true, like you're you're just lying. And [83:59] you're lying because you probably were [84:01] supportive of the vaccine initially and [84:03] you don't want to seem like you were on [84:04] the wrong side of things. [84:06] >> Well, I lost friends. I don't know about [84:07] you cuz I people said I I hadn't been [84:10] vaccinated and therefore I was a risk to [84:12] their mom or their dad or their their [84:14] granny. [84:15] >> Yeah, I lost a bunch of people [84:16] >> and I lost friends like that but um I [84:19] mean in countries like India you you you [84:20] know they didn't have the jab they had [84:22] they used ivormectin to a far far [84:24] greater extent and that [84:26] >> that was just as effective. I I know [84:29] >> I think I used to treat my it's a [84:30] wormer. It's ivormectin. I used to treat [84:33] my cattle with ivormectin. [84:35] >> Um but it worked. It worked well. Uh and [84:38] uh there were other there were other I [84:40] think treatments which worked far. [84:42] >> Do you know what happened to me in [84:43] America over Ivormectin? Are you aware [84:45] of that? [84:45] >> No. No. [84:47] >> CNN like for days was running this uh [84:51] hit piece on me saying that I was taking [84:53] horse dewormer for co. [84:55] >> Oh, it is. It is a worm. [84:57] >> Yeah, it is. But it's also, you know, [84:59] it's great for river blindness and deni [85:01] fever. And I mean, it's they won the [85:04] Nobel Prize for use in human beings. And [85:06] they were they were claiming on CNN that [85:08] I was taking veterinary medicine. And [85:10] they not only that, but they changed the [85:11] color of my face. So they took a video. [85:14] I was supposed to do a concert with Dave [85:15] Chappelle that weekend in Nashville. And [85:18] I had to make a video saying, "I'm [85:19] sorry, but we have to cancel it because [85:20] I got COVID." So I said, "I had COVID [85:23] like two days ago. I was sick, but I'm [85:25] fine now." And I explained all the stuff [85:27] that I my doctor threw the kitchen sink [85:29] at it. We took all these different [85:30] things. And one of the things that I [85:31] mentioned was Ivormectin. And because of [85:34] me mentioning that, I also said [85:35] monoconal antibodies, Zpack. I talked [85:38] about all the different the IV vitamins. [85:40] I took a bunch of different stuff and I [85:42] got better quick. And they took the [85:44] video and changed the color of my face [85:46] to make me look green on CNN. [85:50] >> On CNN. [85:50] >> Well, CNN's not a good not a good [85:52] channel, is it? [85:53] >> I didn't know. I didn't know until I saw [85:56] that. I was like, "Wow, like this is I [85:58] was like, do I have to sue CNN?" Like, [86:00] this is crazy. [86:01] >> So, is that Bill Hartzia when you're [86:03] talking about with the eyes, the worm in [86:05] the eyes? Is that the Bill Hartzer you [86:06] get from the water in Africa? [86:08] >> Um, river blindness. I do not know what [86:12] that [86:12] >> I think it's called Bill Hartz. I think [86:13] I may be wrong. [86:14] >> You might be right. Um, but I know they [86:16] also it's used to treat yellow fever, [86:18] dang fever. It's used to treat a bunch [86:20] of different things. But it, you know, [86:22] it also has antiviral properties that [86:24] have been demonstrated like there's [86:26] papers on it [86:27] >> and it's very cheap. [86:28] >> Yes. That but that's the problem. The [86:31] problem is anybody can make it and you [86:33] could buy it for like it's like a dollar [86:35] a pill or something like that's nothing. [86:37] >> Yeah. And that was the real problem is [86:39] that like if you want to have the [86:40] emergency use authorization of a vaccine [86:43] that hasn't gone through the safety [86:44] protocols in America, you you you have [86:47] to have no other medications that are [86:50] available that can treat it. So the [86:52] reason why they went after me on CNN was [86:54] because clearly I was doing okay. It was [86:57] 3 days later and I said I never got [86:58] vaccinated. So here's all the stuff that [87:00] I took and now I'm fine. and they went [87:03] crazy and it was this concerted campaign [87:05] to try to destroy me. Neil Young took [87:08] his music off Spotify cuz he said [87:10] >> he was he was on sound [87:11] >> because it said that he said that I was [87:12] promoting vaccine misinformation and he [87:14] probably believed that. He probably did [87:16] believe that, but he didn't know what [87:17] the he was talking about. He just [87:19] he's another old boomer that just [87:20] watches the news. [87:21] >> Yes, he I I did used to like his music [87:23] when I was in school, didn't you? [87:25] >> I still love it. Still I still listen. I [87:26] don't care. I mean, I I even told a [87:28] story when I made the video about how um [87:31] when I was at a Neil Young concert, [87:33] well, I was working at a Neil Young [87:34] concert actually when I was 19 and that [87:36] was the last day on the job because a [87:37] riot broke out. And I was like, I'm a [87:40] huge Neil Young fan. Like, I don't care. [87:41] He just doesn't know. He's someone told [87:43] him this or he really thinks he's doing [87:45] the right thing by removing his music. [87:47] Like, okay. But what you're doing is [87:49] you're supporting this machine that is [87:50] lying to people and telling people the [87:52] only way to get through this is to get [87:53] vaccinated. when in fact there's real [87:55] like Udor Pradesh in in India where they [87:58] it was just very low instances of COVID [88:01] fatality. All of it was through [88:03] Ivormect. [88:04] >> Yeah, it's it's [88:05] >> they had amazing success with just [88:07] Ivormectton. [88:08] >> But again, I think the state knows that [88:10] it's caused damage. I just don't think [88:11] they can admit it at the moment. [88:13] >> No, they're not going to admit they're [88:14] never going to admit it. They just gloss [88:16] over it and move on. And some of the [88:17] same people that were promoting that [88:18] on the news, they still deny it. [88:20] They still deny and they've lost debates [88:21] like Chris Cromo got destroyed by my [88:24] buddy Dave Smith because of it. Like [88:25] they're in denial of like the things [88:27] that they were actually saying. [88:28] >> Yeah. Was like fluoride in water and [88:30] folic acid in bread and all this sort of [88:32] >> all that It's all terrible. [88:34] >> It's got I mean it's it's it's sort of [88:37] man getting high on his own supply, [88:38] isn't it? Really? [88:39] >> Well, it's also a business. That's the [88:41] real problem is that there's lobbies in [88:44] this country that, you know, they they [88:47] want to continue making money the same [88:49] way they've been making money. Yeah. And [88:50] one of the ways they do it in America is [88:52] they advertise on the networks. So, the [88:56] pharmaceutical drug companies all [88:58] advertise on all these networks and [89:00] they're an enormous part of the [89:01] advertising budget. I know in England [89:03] that's not legal and it's only legal in [89:05] America and in New Zealand. Those are [89:07] the only two countries that allow [89:08] pharmaceutical drug companies to [89:10] advertise on television. But what it [89:12] effectively does is it stops all [89:14] criticism of any side effects. There's [89:17] no stories on heart attacks. There's no [89:19] stories on strokes. No stories on [89:21] myocarditis. Now, if they weren't [89:23] advertising and then someone was making [89:26] money off of something that was killing [89:28] people, that's the news. Yeah. The news [89:31] would be all over it. But they have [89:32] effectively ruined their own reputation [89:35] by turning a blind eye on something that [89:38] everybody knows. [89:39] >> But you think they're turning a blind [89:40] eye? I think they know. I I think they [89:42] know, but they can't admit it. I think [89:43] >> Well, the people the individuals most [89:45] certainly must know someone who got [89:48] >> something from CO some from the CO shot. [89:51] Someone, you know, someone who had a [89:53] stroke. You know, someone who's got a [89:54] neurological condition. You I know way [89:56] too many people for you to not know [89:58] anybody. I know I have two people that I [90:00] know that have pacemakers now. Like [90:02] there's there's a lot of weird horrible [90:05] side effects that happen from that. If [90:07] you don't know anybody that had one, I [90:08] don't believe you. [90:09] >> Well, I know loads. I mean, my my [90:11] sister-in-law had myocarditis. [90:14] Uh I've had a friend, my best friend had [90:16] a stroke literally a week after having [90:18] having the jab. Uh people have had [90:21] problems with heart arrhythmia. [90:23] >> Yeah. [90:23] >> All sorts of stuff. And and there's some [90:26] been some issues with blood, too. [90:27] >> Yeah. So look, I I think as usual, money [90:31] probably goes to the root of it, Joe. [90:33] >> Absolutely. [90:34] >> And we had something in in the Britain [90:35] called the nudge team, which basically [90:37] was I mean, how the government thought [90:38] that was okay. It's a bit like when I [90:40] was in football, people were hacking my [90:41] phone and thought that was okay. But [90:43] with the nudge team, it was to nudge [90:45] people into accepting the lockdown and [90:47] and it was effectively very clever [90:51] manipulation of the population. So look, [90:53] I mean I I you can't believe that the [90:56] state thinks that's okay, but they did. [90:58] >> They did. Yeah, they did. And they did [91:00] it in America for depending on which [91:03] city you were in to various extents. [91:06] Varying extents. Uh California was bad. [91:09] It was real bad. I mean, they they [91:11] closed down all the comedy clubs. They [91:12] closed they lost 70% of all the [91:14] restaurants in Los Angeles. I mean, it's [91:16] crazy. [91:17] >> Yeah. It's a great place to live, [91:18] California, though. I What's that? [91:20] >> It's a great place to live, California. [91:21] That's why people still tolerate it. I [91:23] mean, if if California had the weather [91:25] of Seattle, it would be empty. [91:26] >> It would. Yes. [91:27] >> You know what I mean? It's like the [91:29] reason why people are still there is [91:30] because God, it's so amazing and there's [91:32] so many cool people there and it's so [91:34] nice and the weather's incredible and [91:35] the views and you could be at the ocean [91:37] and then two hours later you're in the [91:39] mountains. I mean, it's an amazing [91:41] place. [91:41] >> It's an amazing place. I I went [91:42] >> filled with dumb asses. [91:44] >> Yeah. It was socialist. Yeah. [91:46] Unfortunately, it's been permeated [91:47] socialism [91:48] >> that and grifters. grifters pretending [91:50] to be socialist. They're essentially [91:52] those people with the wolf with the the [91:54] sheep wrapped around them. That's a [91:56] large Yeah. That's a large portion of [91:58] the government in Los Angeles and a [92:00] large portion of the government in [92:01] California in general. And the way you [92:03] know this is how wealthy those [92:05] people are and how it doesn't make sense [92:07] how they're so wealthy. You're making [92:09] how much a year and you're worth how [92:10] much? [92:11] >> Crime. [92:11] >> Yeah. Crime. They're doing crime. Crime. [92:13] Well, you one of the things that [92:15] happened very recently is uh they just [92:17] announced that um the governor of [92:20] California, one of the people on his [92:22] staff had been wearing a wire for over a [92:25] year. Did you see that story, Jamie? [92:30] >> What's that? [92:31] >> I don't know what they got. [92:32] >> Well, no, no, I don't know what they got [92:33] either, but this lady had been See if [92:35] you can find it what it says. But she [92:37] had been wearing a wire. She's uh [92:40] working for the Gavin Newsome [92:42] organization. Yeah. [92:43] >> And uh she was working for the [92:45] administration and she was wearing a [92:46] wire for the FBI cuz they had been [92:48] investigating him [92:49] >> for and this was during the Biden [92:51] administration. They started this. So [92:52] they started this in 2024. If they're [92:56] investigating him, it's supposed to be [92:57] like they must know that some real [92:59] is going down. FBI infiltrated Gavin [93:01] Newsome's inner circle by convincing [93:03] Governor's Ally to wear a wire. [93:05] >> Yeah. [93:07] >> Not good. [93:08] >> Not good. But I think it's the same in [93:10] Chicago. You've got some pretty bad [93:13] spots. San Francisco, I think, is not [93:15] good. [93:16] >> It's a lot of people that are profiting [93:18] off of this idea that, you know, the [93:20] government should be taking care of [93:22] everybody and you should be making all [93:23] this money from taxes. And then, you [93:25] know, California spent $24 billion on [93:28] the homeless and it just got worse. It [93:30] just like and so that now it's an [93:31] industry. So now you have this homeless, [93:33] taking care of the homeless is now an [93:35] industry. And there's people on the [93:36] homeless industry board that are making [93:38] hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. [93:40] And it's like what are we doing? Well, [93:42] >> it's the same with compliance. It's the [93:44] same with, as you say, DEI. Yeah. [93:46] >> There's a whole industry in the UK of [93:48] people making vast amounts of money on, [93:50] you know, compliance, DEI, [93:52] >> basically wealth creation, uh, which [93:55] ultimately uh, strips personal [93:57] responsibility and and tries to imbue [94:00] everybody with a very sort of maligned [94:02] philosophy which which which is very [94:04] damaging to to [94:05] >> under the guise of being inclusive. [94:07] >> Correct. And also, you're getting [94:09] wealthy. How many people from these [94:11] nonprofits are getting enormously [94:13] wealthy? Like, this is insane. And that [94:16] was one of the things that US A clearly [94:18] uncovered. I mean, I don't know if you [94:19] ever seen Mike Benz and some of his [94:21] takes on it. [94:22] >> Yeah. And it's shocking. I couldn't [94:24] believe it. [94:24] >> There's so many hours of it. It's almost [94:26] like there's too much information to [94:28] digest. You you I could listen to like [94:31] an hour of it. I was like, I got to stop [94:33] because I just don't know when this [94:34] ends. I'm not even absorbing this. I'm [94:36] just so flabbergasted by the extent of [94:39] the corruption. The amount of money [94:40] that's been gone to fraud and possibly [94:44] waste over the years is just staggering. [94:47] But but it also went all over the world, [94:49] didn't it? It was it was a a philosophy, [94:52] a poor philosophy that was being [94:54] exported to other countries and [94:57] particularly to Britain. I mean, we we [94:58] have a presenter called Rory Stewart. [95:00] His wife was was being funded by some of [95:02] this stuff which got shut down. Did they [95:04] shut the whole thing down? They shut us. [95:06] They leave a remnant of it. [95:08] >> I don't know exactly how much they've [95:09] left, but essentially it's been shut [95:11] down. Um, of course, if there was ever a [95:14] Democrat that got elected president in [95:16] 2028, it would probably start that [95:18] right back up. Open the borders right [95:20] back up. Business as usual. [95:22] >> That would not be good, J. [95:23] >> No. It seems like there's there was a [95:25] desire to move people into blue states [95:29] and then eventually get them on social [95:33] assistance and then get them to become [95:35] citizens and then you have guaranteed [95:36] voters because they you want to continue [95:39] this, right? You want to continue living [95:40] like this. Well, this is the way. And [95:41] then you would just completely take over [95:43] the presidential elections. And I think [95:45] they were trying to do that. This is [95:47] Elon's perspective and I think he's [95:49] right. Um and you know he's obviously [95:51] much more aware of the problem in terms [95:53] of like the extent that US aid was [95:56] involved and these nonprofits and NOS's [95:58] were involved. It seems like there was a [96:00] concerted effort to do this and it's [96:02] it's disturbing [96:03] >> but again a lack of respect for tax fair [96:05] taxpayer funds which which is what we [96:08] have in the UK. I mean, we need your [96:10] help at the moment. You've got at least [96:12] you you're making a stab at returning to [96:14] some form of normality [96:15] >> for now, but if we don't it I mean, [96:17] we might have it up by going to [96:18] Iran. I mean, the this war is not [96:21] something anybody that's conservative [96:23] wanted. Most people don't want it except [96:25] supporters of Israel. They're the only [96:26] people that seem to be thinking it's a [96:29] good idea in this country. Most people [96:31] are horrified by the idea because Trump [96:34] was elected. One of the pillars that he [96:36] he stood for apparently was that he [96:38] doesn't want any more wars. [96:40] >> Well, he was I came out against it on [96:42] the basis for us of rail politique, [96:44] which is it wasn't in the interest of [96:46] the British nation. [96:47] >> Right. [96:47] >> And I think again most of these uh uh [96:50] leaders should put the interests of [96:51] their taxpaying public first [96:54] >> and there's only a reason to go to war [96:56] if if it's going to benefit you. [96:58] >> And I I it was difficult to see what the [97:00] benefit was. uh uh although I think Iran [97:04] is is a a sort of malevolent state and [97:07] it is spreading uh very bad philosophy [97:10] across obviously you know you you've got [97:12] Hezbollah in in in Lebanon and then [97:15] we've got Hamas uh uh causing a problem. [97:18] So I think I think they are a problem [97:20] but the the certainly from our point of [97:22] view I mean you you're you're the only [97:23] country with a with the ability to do [97:25] anything about it. I mean, we we we had [97:27] one warship uh which which which which [97:30] didn't work properly when it was sent [97:31] out to help. So, I mean, goodness knows [97:34] we, you know, we've spent all our money [97:36] on welfare and not enough money on [97:38] defense. So, no, we need we need help [97:41] and and I think um to your point, Elon [97:44] Musk has been to to my mind incredibly [97:47] helpful in restoring free speech because [97:51] Starmer and and and these Fabians, [97:54] Fabian Pablo, Hallane Society, as I call [97:57] them, they're sort of all they're all [97:59] they've all got this malign philosophy [98:00] and and and and I think what giving us [98:03] free speech has done is it's stopped [98:04] them uh uh uh crushing the spirit of [98:08] those people who do want to debate, who [98:10] do want to discuss, who do want to get [98:11] at the truth, [98:12] >> but they've done so much to stop free [98:14] speech with all these arrests. [98:16] >> It's extraordinary [98:16] >> because they've also they've [98:18] incentivized people to keep their mouth [98:19] shut because no one wants to be in [98:20] trouble. [98:21] >> Well, it's it's two-tier policing. [98:23] You've got to your point about, you [98:25] know, that the Palestinian marches are [98:27] tolerated whereas any form of Tommy [98:30] Robinson uh uh march and Tommy Robinson [98:33] in the UK, he's deeply uh disliked by [98:37] the establishment. I give him credit for [98:39] what he did again on the grooming gangs [98:41] in 2003. He was warning about this in [98:44] 2003 in Luton. Not only that, I remember [98:47] people dismissing that um in 2003 or [98:50] four where where whenever it was when I [98:52] first heard about it, they were talking [98:53] about him as he was just horrible [98:56] faright extremist. [98:58] >> I know. [98:58] >> And that he was uh making up these [99:01] stories about these uh grooming gangs [99:03] and rape gangs. I I remember hearing [99:04] that. I remember not knowing like what [99:06] what is it? What's accurate here? Like [99:08] what's going on? [99:09] >> Well, I think the the accuracy is that [99:10] he was right. uh the establishment [99:13] didn't want to admit it because if we're [99:16] right well I am I I think we are right [99:18] about their multicultural post-war [99:20] experiment they realized it was failing [99:22] because you can't justify [99:25] uh the the the the sort of abuse and [99:27] grooming of the most vulnerable people [99:29] in your society uh by people who've come [99:32] into the country uh they should be [99:34] treated equally under the law a rape is [99:36] a rape it doesn't matter whether it's [99:37] perpetrated by somebody from is from a [99:40] Muslim country for a Christian country, [99:42] rape is rape and it should be treated [99:44] the same. [99:44] >> What would you do to stop this? Like [99:47] imagine if you got into power right now, [99:49] what would you do to put a stop to that? [99:52] >> Well, we have to root it out and we have [99:54] to stop it. [99:55] >> Apply the law, the the the law of our [99:58] land to the people who are perpetrating [100:00] it. [100:01] >> The problem is the police have [100:03] institutionally been been taught that [100:05] they are racist. uh and we had the [100:08] Steven Lawrence killing uh which was [100:10] which was didn't reflect well in the UK [100:12] but the response to it has created this [100:15] fear of being being called a racist [100:17] >> which is the Steven Lawrence killing [100:18] >> Steven Lawrence was killed I think it [100:19] was in it was late 90s he was he was he [100:22] was stabbed by some uh sort of British [100:25] uh miscreants [100:27] >> um and where was he from he died he it [100:29] was it was in London [100:30] >> where was Steven Lawrence from [100:32] >> he was he was a black a black so it's a [100:34] racial hate crime [100:35] >> it was a racial hate crime [100:37] Okay. And this is in the [100:38] >> and it was blown up. And again, you you [100:39] find that the racial hate crime [100:41] involving any white people is now blown [100:43] up, whereas the more the very often and [100:46] increasingly common uh uh acts against [100:49] the indigenous white people are hushed [100:52] up as much as they possibly can be. [100:53] >> That's a funny thing to say. Indigenous [100:55] white people. [100:56] >> Yeah. [100:56] >> And what I mean is real for England, but [100:58] I mean nobody thinks about that in [101:00] America. You would never say like [101:02] indigenous white people. Well, we we we [101:04] we do have an identity. [101:06] >> Yes, of course. It's the reason why [101:07] everyone's so pale. [101:08] >> Yeah. Yeah. We we do we do have an [101:10] identity, but I think it really is [101:12] indigenous. [101:12] >> As I say, we've been very tolerant and [101:14] of of people who've needed help. We've [101:16] let them into the country and on the [101:18] whole, they have integrated and they [101:19] have contributed, right? [101:20] >> And I have no problem with that. Like [101:21] you, I'm absolutely in favor of that. [101:23] And I [101:24] >> Right. The only problem is the people [101:25] that aren't integrating. [101:26] >> If people don't want to come and and [101:28] live and integrate and contribute, then [101:31] they shouldn't come. and they should [101:32] they should remain in their own country. [101:33] >> Well, it's also the idea of [101:34] incentivizing people to illegally [101:36] migrate to your country is just pure [101:38] insanity. You're going to run out of [101:40] money and you're also putting a burden [101:42] on these taxpayers for no reason [101:44] whatsoever. It does it's a bad use of [101:45] their tax dollars. [101:46] >> But in our immigration document, we put [101:48] forward, you know, the case for a, you [101:50] know, basically a a hostile environment. [101:53] We don't want to be handing out welfare. [101:56] We don't want to be encouraging people [101:58] to come. We want to create a hostile [102:01] environment and encourage people to go [102:03] uh unless they're contributing to go [102:04] back to their own country uh and and [102:06] live there particularly if they don't [102:08] like our culture and our laws and they [102:09] don't respect us and they think we're [102:11] the infidel. [102:12] >> But do do laws exist that would allow [102:14] you to ex to deport those people? [102:16] >> Well, you'd have to repeal. So that's [102:18] why that's why it's so important we win [102:21] an overall majority in in parliament by [102:23] 29 because then we can repeal a lot of [102:26] this legislation which will then empower [102:29] the nation state again. [102:31] >> So this is the legislation that provides [102:34] health care, dental, welfare, housing. [102:38] >> This is legislation largely passed by [102:40] Tony Blair and his acolytes [102:42] >> and this was all just to encourage mass [102:44] migration. I think it was to encourage [102:47] this mass immigration and make it very [102:50] difficult to stop it practically. [102:52] Interestingly, he's quite crafty because [102:54] he came out the other day trying to [102:56] distance himself from a lot of the [102:58] things that he he has actually created. [103:01] So, he's he's quite a canny old fox and [103:04] he does look he looks a bit like [103:05] Beelzeub these days. I mean, he's got [103:07] this white hair and these piercing sort [103:09] of eyes. I I I I can't help look at him [103:12] and and think of evil. But but look, so [103:15] he ultimately uh uh I think him and his [103:18] team realized what they they realized [103:21] what they were doing and he had he had [103:22] it was all done through the law. You [103:24] have to do in a in a country that [103:26] believes in the rule of law. The only [103:28] way to change it is through control of [103:31] parliament. So you have to do it top [103:33] down through the parliamentary system so [103:36] that you can repeal the laws and you can [103:38] pass the laws you want to pass to [103:40] empower the nation state. And at the [103:42] same time, which we're doing, you need [103:44] to start controlling local government as [103:46] well because local government's gone [103:47] badly wrong. And a lot of the failures [103:49] from the from the rape gang inquiry [103:52] weren't just the national government, [103:54] you had failure at local government as [103:56] well. So [103:56] >> So is are the local government willfully [103:58] ignorant? Are they denying its [104:00] existence? Are they gaslighting people [104:02] on it? Like [104:03] >> Yeah. In the case of Labor, they've [104:05] enabled it. you know, they they they I I [104:08] say I can't see how anybody can ever [104:10] vote Labor again after they've read this [104:12] report because Labor has clearly enabled [104:14] this both at national level by denying [104:18] what's been going on and at local level [104:20] where you where you have local [104:22] government. So, it happens mainly in [104:24] labor controlled areas. [104:26] You've got people denying completely [104:28] that this has been happening whereas we [104:31] know it's happening. We have people like [104:33] Sammy Woodhouse who's a victim of it who [104:34] had a child by her by her rapist. So, so [104:39] ultimately local government has to be [104:41] controlled from the bottom up and we [104:43] started that process. We won uh nine out [104:46] of nine county council seats in Norfolk. [104:49] So, my constituency is on the the coast [104:51] in England. So, it's a coastal [104:53] constituency [104:54] been very badly served by the post-war [104:57] elite. So the fishermen in England have [104:58] been sold down the river uh to to [105:01] largely to the European uh fishermen as [105:03] part of the membership of the EU. So [105:06] Norfolk is a is a county on the east [105:09] coast. It's it's got rich farmland and [105:12] farming is my passion. I I love farming. [105:14] I absolutely it's my hobby and I love [105:16] it. So I at the end of the day we have [105:19] to control local government and change [105:20] it bottom up and we have to then get [105:22] control of national government and [105:25] change it top down. I would imagine. [105:26] >> And if we can do that, Joe, I truly [105:28] think if we can I truly think we can [105:30] release the spirit of the British [105:32] people, and I think they want it. But [105:34] they've got to show they've got to show [105:35] to the ballot box that that's what they [105:36] want. [105:37] >> I'd imagine there's going to be an [105:38] enormous amount of resistance to this [105:40] kind of huge change [105:43] >> from organized crime, which I think [105:44] we're now in the hands of, from a [105:46] corrupt judiciary, from a police force [105:48] that's that's gone wrong, uh from local [105:52] government that's gone wrong, the NHS [105:53] has gone wrong. again it's it's it's a [105:55] state monopoly and and it its original [105:58] function I think has been subverted. So [106:02] so uh you've got you've got everything [106:04] to your point the education system is [106:06] wrong. So there's a lot of change that [106:08] needs to happen but I think [106:10] fundamentally the electorate you saw [106:13] them in 2016 vote to take back their [106:15] sovereignty. The government wrote a [106:17] letter uh to all the households in the [106:21] UK recommending they vote to remain in [106:23] the European Union. This is David [106:25] Cameron. [106:26] But actually the British people didn't. [106:28] They voted to leave. And they didn't do [106:30] it, I think, for financial reasons. They [106:32] did it because they wanted their country [106:33] back. They wanted their sovereignty [106:35] back. They wanted an accountable [106:37] parliament in Westminster. And some of [106:39] our problems emanate from the fact that [106:40] Tony Blair's reforms have undermined our [106:44] parliament. So our parliament is [106:46] supposed to be omnipotent. It's supposed [106:48] to be completely contain the elected [106:50] representatives of the people. So so [106:53] parliament is supposed to be right at [106:55] the top of the chain. But what's [106:57] happened is it's been undermined by [106:59] these quangos that Tony Blair set up [107:01] which has effectively created at the [107:03] life of their own. So the Supreme Court [107:05] and literally there are hundreds of [107:07] these quangos that now employ unelected [107:10] people. [107:10] >> You what is that word quango? Well, [107:12] Quango is a like a quasi national [107:15] government organization. Okay. [107:17] >> So, so they they are, you know, you've [107:19] got all sorts of bodies, you know, the [107:22] sort of bar standards board. You've got [107:25] loads of bodies which now uh prevail. [107:28] You know, you've got bodies on almost [107:30] everything which which again have have [107:32] flourished since Tony Blair's [107:34] legislation. Prior to that, [107:36] uh power lay with parliament. So that's [107:39] why they've been able to control a lot [107:42] of what goes on because the two-party [107:44] system, the blues and the reds, the [107:46] tourism and labor basically have have [107:50] tried to out compete each other. So the [107:51] entire parliament uh Blair took it left. [107:54] Cameron emulated Blair and you didn't [107:58] actually get proper conservative thought [108:01] uh to change uh a lot of this stuff that [108:04] was wrong. So, I think I think uh I [108:07] think this is an opportunity and I I [108:09] think it's our last opportunity and I [108:11] and all the help we can get from from [108:14] you guys. I mean, we made a bad mistake [108:15] in in in in letting you declare your [108:17] independence, which you're celebrating [108:19] tomorrow in the first place. [108:20] >> Had we had we played our cards better, I [108:22] think you'd still be you should should [108:24] still be part of part of I think what's [108:27] going on. [108:28] >> It's worked out pretty well for you. Not [108:29] so well for us. [108:30] >> Sorry, but I think we're better off. But [108:32] I I do want to see I do want to see [108:34] >> otherwise it'll be under your laws. [108:36] >> Well, I do want to see the Anglo-Saxon [108:39] world support each other. I think [108:40] there's not enough of that. We're too [108:42] fragmented. There's too much sort of [108:45] whether it's the World Economic Forum. I [108:47] said, whatever the reason, there's too [108:49] much fragmentation and too much [108:51] undermining [108:52] of of this cohesive Anglo-Saxon world, [108:56] which let's face it, is the reason why [108:58] we all have individual freedom. Because [109:00] as we said earlier, individual freedom [109:02] is incredibly fragile and we could we [109:04] could lose it at any minute. Joe, [109:06] >> I mean the the society that what you [109:08] know the way we look at America when in [109:11] when people look at it the right way or [109:13] when people are proud of America, they [109:15] look at it as a place where anybody can [109:17] come and achieve your dreams. And it's [109:19] it it doesn't mean only white people. It [109:22] doesn't mean only black people. It just [109:24] means Americans. We're supposed to be a [109:25] community, a team, you know, and the [109:27] fact that we're a melting pot, that [109:29] we're not like, you know, indigenous [109:31] white people like England is part of the [109:33] fun of it all, that everyone's welcome. [109:35] Just come over here and do your thing [109:38] and follow the rules. But the problem [109:41] with this country is the problem with [109:43] any country when you're being run by [109:45] people that are completely corrupt and [109:47] you're being run by people that are [109:49] influenced by enormous corporations that [109:51] don't care about the people, that only [109:52] care about the bottom line. how much [109:54] money they're making and how do they how [109:57] do they rig things and and then you have [109:58] politicians that are making $170,000 a [110:01] year but they're somehow worth $400 [110:02] million and no one questions it and no [110:05] one's in jail. The whole thing is [110:06] bonkers and it's just you're always [110:08] going to have crooks and you you got to [110:10] hold them off. You got to hold them off [110:12] as much as possible. When you recognize [110:13] they're in you got to do a cleaning. You [110:15] got to clean house. You got to clean [110:17] house and get rid of them. If you don't, [110:18] you're just going to have the problems [110:20] just going to get worse because they're [110:21] going to figure out, okay, it's just [110:22] like antibiotics when you don't take the [110:24] full round and the the stuff doesn't [110:26] really go down your Well, now you got [110:27] medication resistant bacteria. [110:29] Congratulations. Your medication has [110:32] made the bacteria worse. So, if you [110:34] fight off the corruption a little bit [110:36] and then you stop, they go, "Oh, well, [110:39] we got to we were close. We almost [110:41] figured it all out and got it all [110:43] rigged, but now we got to make sure that [110:45] we lock people down and have even more [110:47] laws and even more restrictions. And [110:51] >> well, you've you've summed up what we [110:52] need to do in the UK very well. I mean, [110:54] we are, I think, in the hands of [110:55] organized crime. I I think a lot of the [110:57] institutions that we had previously have [111:00] become rotten. [111:01] >> I think it's the right way to recognize [111:02] it, too. [111:03] >> It is. It's in the And and to your [111:05] point, you know, we do need to now [111:06] punish people who've let us down. [111:08] >> Yeah. It's crime. It really is crime. [111:10] and and to just pretend because it's [111:12] been going on for so long and that it's [111:14] business as usual that it's not a crime. [111:16] Like, no, it's crime. It's crime. It's [111:18] just somehow another crime that's [111:20] tolerated. [111:21] >> Well, letting down people who've elected [111:24] you and given their trust to you is is a [111:28] massive crime. It's it's [111:30] >> not just letting down betraying them. I [111:32] mean, we we have the same as you, but to [111:33] a lesser extent because you you've [111:35] obviously got far more wealth than us. [111:36] But like you see these officials [111:39] >> uh who end up becoming rich and you [111:42] wonder how they do it. [111:43] >> Yeah. [111:43] >> And they're on salaries and they're [111:45] taxed heavily and yet they always seem [111:47] to flourish. They never seem to be short [111:48] of money. So I I I and I look at our [111:51] judiciary which is again now a quango. [111:54] The judges um are no longer appointed by [111:57] parliament. appointed by this woke [111:59] quanger. [112:01] And I had an issue in parliament, you [112:03] know, I I was uh I I challenged [112:06] parliament because to the point where [112:08] I've been saying we need to return power [112:10] to parliament. They they have this body [112:13] called the indep in ICGS independent [112:17] complaint agreement scheme. And in [112:19] parliament we have this system called [112:20] parliamentary privilege. So I can speak [112:22] on the floor of the house and I can't be [112:24] sued for liable. You can say whatever [112:26] you want. That's the essence of free [112:28] speech in the in the chamber of the [112:30] commons. Now, this this body has [112:33] actually been expressly taken outside [112:35] parliament. And the case I had against [112:38] them was they tried to say I couldn't I [112:40] caught them doing something I thought [112:41] was wrong and I wanted to take them to [112:43] court. They said you can't take us to [112:45] court because we're parliamentary [112:46] privileged even though it doesn't it's [112:48] not the chamber. It's not an MP [112:50] speaking. It's got no MPs on this [112:52] committee. It doesn't report to a [112:54] parliamentary committee. And yet the [112:56] judge found they had parliamentary [112:57] privilege, didn't address the questions. [113:00] So this is how this is how the elected [113:03] assembly has been undermined. [113:05] >> And this is what we have to we have to [113:07] return power to the elected [113:08] representatives of the people. [113:10] >> There's also another thing that the that [113:12] Britain has done recently that's very [113:14] disturbing, which is eliminate jury [113:16] trials for a lot of people. [113:17] >> They're trying to do that. [113:19] >> They're trying to do that. [113:19] >> They're trying. So it's not fit. It's [113:21] not established yet. They haven't yet [113:23] done it because there is there are still [113:26] a few decent Labor MPs who fought [113:28] against it. [113:29] >> Oh, good. [113:30] >> Uh but again, I think that's all a [113:33] manifestation of organized crime because [113:35] if you control the judges, [113:37] >> of course, [113:38] >> and and you and you can force [113:41] >> more and more people through a judge [113:44] system rather than a jury system. And so [113:46] for liel trials, I I fought a liel trial [113:49] when I was in football against uh the [113:52] the uh the Times, which is Rupert [113:54] Murdoch's paper. And you know, I I think [113:57] I had my phones hacked and I fought a [113:59] liel trial against them. [114:02] >> So the newspaper hacked your phone? [114:03] >> They hacked when I was in football, they [114:05] were hacking my phone every day. [114:06] >> Wow. How were they doing it? [114:07] >> Listening in through my voicemails. [114:09] >> How'd they do it? [114:10] >> And then they can a number from the [114:12] voicemail and start listening. So if you [114:13] called me and left a message, they could [114:15] flag your number off my phone. And they [114:17] thought this was okay. These were [114:18] national newspapers. [114:20] >> And again, I I [114:21] >> How did they get into your voicemail? [114:22] >> Well, because they in the old days, you [114:24] you know, people if people had a a code [114:26] to to encrypt their phone, and they [114:28] didn't do it properly. [114:29] >> So we had 0000. [114:32] >> If you didn't change that, they got into [114:33] your phone, right? So they got into my [114:35] phone. They got into lots of people's [114:36] phones. [114:37] >> Wow. [114:37] >> Cuz you never know quite how they did [114:39] it. So if you'd left me a message, they [114:40] could flag your number [114:42] >> and then they'd start listening to your [114:43] phone and everything else. Now I think [114:45] you know that was that was that in this [114:47] case Murdoch but Murdoch I think has [114:49] done a lot for the right-wing cause. I [114:52] don't always agree with everything and I [114:53] certainly didn't agree with him hacking [114:54] phones. But this all this all goes to [114:57] the point of the establishment becoming [115:01] corrupted and from corruption uh I think [115:05] again you end up with oppression and and [115:08] and we need to sort that out. [115:11] >> Yeah. [115:11] >> And I'm hoping if I put myself up and [115:13] the people agree they will change things [115:16] and I think they are in a feebra mood. [115:17] So I'm hoping that they will take the [115:19] opportunity and give us the power to do [115:21] it. I'm glad you brought that part up [115:22] because we're not really aware in [115:24] America of what the general mood of the [115:27] country is like where people are leaning [115:29] in what direction as far as England [115:32] goes. What is it like? Are are is a [115:35] large percentage of the population fed [115:37] up? I mean, what what's going on over [115:39] there? [115:39] >> Well, I think it to your point, you've [115:41] got this body of people who are [115:43] profiting on the back of these concepts [115:47] which are you and I would agree are [115:48] completely flawed. So they're obviously [115:51] they're obviously in control at the [115:53] moment. But then you've got the body of [115:55] people this this increasingly small [115:57] percentage of what I call the private [115:58] sector which now accounts for a smaller [116:02] and smaller proportion of GDP. [116:04] So so your percentage of GDP uh uh [116:08] accounted for by the state is much much [116:10] smaller than ours. So our I mean I mean [116:13] directly and indirectly I I I I would [116:15] estimate that our that our uh the share [116:18] of government now in our in our economy [116:21] is is over 50%. If you take the the [116:23] effect of these quangos and everything [116:25] else here you're much smaller than that. [116:27] Now that's come you know pre-B Blair [116:31] Thatcher we we were in a very very good [116:34] economic state and the state accounted [116:36] for you know what it was 30 33% [116:39] something like that. It's now up to [116:40] nearly 50% and rising. And and this is [116:43] what the the Fabians want. They want a [116:46] dependency culture, [116:47] >> right? [116:48] >> A sort of centrally planned USSR style [116:52] uh uh dishing out of taxpayer funds. So [116:55] they've diminished the private sector [116:56] which they're taxing into oblivion which [116:59] has meant that a lot of our most able [117:01] people have left the country. So we've [117:02] lost a lot of our rain makers have gone. [117:05] So a lot of our best people uh went to [117:08] obviously Italy to Dubai to Abu Dhabi. [117:11] Uh all over the world some of them would [117:13] have come here. Uh so the best brains um [117:16] have have gone. Uh and and I think the [117:19] non-doms have gone which again I think [117:21] is a huge error because they've now been [117:23] taxed rather than being encouraged to to [117:25] spend their time in the UK. [117:28] So, so, so, so we're being hollowed out [117:30] by this socialist philosophy [117:34] which is creating uh uh damage to the [117:37] private sector and in empowering [117:41] the the public sector. [117:42] >> Is there a large percentage of young [117:44] people that are aware of this? [117:46] >> Oh, the young people have I' I've been [117:49] incredibly impressed and a lot of them [117:51] support us. So they, you know, they can [117:53] see that we're trying, I think, to at [117:55] least rebalance this. And until we get [117:58] this right, it's going to be very [118:00] difficult to to sort their situation [118:03] out. Now, there's no overnight fix these [118:06] days. And and I don't know, I don't [118:08] think any of us know quite what effect [118:10] AI is going to have on on the employment [118:13] market, on on on opportunities for young [118:15] people. Uh I mean in many ways if [118:18] they've got a very good brain they've [118:20] got the huge opportunity to to to do [118:22] very well and enrich themselves but [118:26] increasingly it's fewer and fewer [118:27] people. It's not like the industrial [118:29] revolution where the majority of people [118:31] had an increasing standard of living. [118:33] It's going to be very interesting to see [118:35] how we all cope with with this uh [118:38] incredibly fastm moving revolution which [118:42] is what it is which is which is arguably [118:45] uh going to create some incredibly rich [118:47] people and uh those people who haven't [118:50] got the brain power will end up [118:52] struggling. So it's I I it's hard to see [118:54] how that's going to end. [118:56] >> But that doesn't mean to say we want a [118:58] state central planning everything. We [119:00] know historically that doesn't work. [119:03] and and and from that comes a sort of [119:06] shutdown of thought and and and debate [119:08] and and free speech and all the things [119:10] that [119:12] that you and I I love. I mean, I I [119:14] that's to me that's that's a country I [119:16] want to live in. I don't want to live in [119:17] a centrally planned mess. So, so I I [119:21] we're in very uncertain times, but [119:24] I I'm I'm optimistic that if you release [119:27] the ability, the innate ability of of of [119:30] people uh in Britain in particular in [119:33] this case, I think we can turn it round [119:35] still. Can't guarantee it, but I'm [119:37] pretty sure we can still turn it round, [119:39] but it's got to happen now. If it [119:40] doesn't happen now, it would have gone [119:42] too far. Well, I certainly hope you can [119:45] because uh for America when we see [119:47] what's happening, particularly with the [119:49] social media post and the arrest, it's [119:50] so disturbing for us. And then of course [119:54] with your the rape gang inquiry report [119:56] was impossible to believe. It's it's [120:00] impossible. So, [120:02] you know, we um we hope you guys turn it [120:05] around. And when is your elections? [120:08] >> We don't know, Joe. Uh we've got this [120:10] character Andy Burnham who [120:13] >> Kia Starmer has stepped down as you [120:16] probably know. Andy Burnham I call him [120:18] the Ghostbuster. [120:19] >> Uh he is just a more user friendly [120:23] version of of of Kostama. He's been the [120:26] mayor of Manchester. He stood in a [120:29] bi-election recently uh where he was [120:32] elected uh and he's apparently going to [120:35] be anointed as prime minister uh by the [120:38] 20th of July. So this is a guy who up [120:42] until recently wasn't even an elected [120:44] politician. He's been a politician in [120:46] the past. [120:47] >> He's been in the cabinet. [120:48] >> Kier Starmer can just step down and put [120:51] another guy in his place and that guy [120:52] takes over. [120:53] >> That's that's what's happening. [120:54] >> That sounds crazy. [120:56] >> I know. What a stupid way to run things. [120:59] >> It's it's it's bonkers. [121:01] >> But so so so the answer to your question [121:03] is [121:04] >> he could run till 29. That's [121:06] >> that's the backs stop date. [121:08] >> He could and everybody says he might [121:11] have a snap election. I think that's [121:13] highly unlikely. Labor have got the [121:14] biggest postwar majority. [121:16] >> Why would he have a snap election? [121:18] >> He's got three years left with a huge [121:19] majority. So why would he why would he [121:21] take a risk? uh in Manchester. He he he [121:24] was Manchester Mayor. [121:26] >> Uhhuh. [121:27] >> He's actually in the report in the rape [121:29] gang report. He's mentioned in the rape [121:31] gang report for not doing enough in [121:33] Manchester, which which is a center of [121:36] rape gangs. Uh so he's involved in that. [121:39] He's involved in that. You know, he's [121:40] mentioned in our report. It's in there. [121:43] So So look, I I think in answer your [121:46] question, when's the election going to [121:47] be? Some people would say he's gonna [121:49] have an election soon. I don't agree [121:51] with that. I think he'd be mad because I [121:54] still think the public will judge Labor [121:57] harshly [121:58] uh because the economy is not going [122:00] well. People aren't feeling richer. [122:01] They're feeling poorer. Their businesses [122:04] are struggling. Their taxes have gone [122:05] up. Our taxes are at postwar highs now. [122:09] So, and and the waste is just off the [122:11] scale. So, so when I'm in the public [122:13] accounts committee, which I sit in, [122:15] again, it's all on you can you can watch [122:16] it on people watch it on on screens. [122:19] It's it's it's it's the public accounts [122:21] committee is the most powerful committee [122:22] in parliament and we question these [122:24] civil servants to try and hold them to [122:26] account for the taxpayer. The waste is [122:29] just off the scale. So you've got a [122:31] wasteful, inefficient state which is [122:34] then taxing the private sector into [122:36] oblivion, the increasingly small private [122:38] sector. And and that's not a recipe [122:41] that's going to encourage risk-taking [122:43] investment. It's not going to, you know, [122:45] they're taxing family farms. They're [122:47] taxing family businesses for the first [122:49] time. They're basically breaking the [122:51] backbone of Britain. To the Fabian [122:53] point, they are they are enacting this [122:55] Fabian agenda which is designed to [122:57] create a a society that's reliant on the [123:00] state and I don't want I don't want [123:02] that. [123:03] >> Nobody should want that. Well, listen, [123:05] man. Thank you very much for being here. [123:07] I really appreciate it. I really [123:08] appreciate you uh taking the time. I [123:10] know it was difficult to get here for [123:11] this day and this is the only day we had [123:13] open. So, [123:13] >> no, it's very kind of you to have me on, [123:15] Joe. I know it's it's some big [123:16] celebrations tomorrow. So, [123:18] >> good luck to you. [123:19] >> Yeah, we're we're going to win. We're [123:20] going to we're I I'm I'm amazed at the [123:22] support we've got. And um I'm amazed at [123:25] the number of people who even on the [123:26] plane come up to me and and and and [123:28] thank me for what I'm doing and say [123:30] they're going to vote for us. [123:32] >> And I I think Britain's on the turn and [123:35] hopefully if we if we put up shop, tell [123:38] them what we're going to do, give them a [123:40] chance to vote for us. If they vote for [123:42] us, I shall do my best to change things. [123:44] If they don't vote for me, well, that's [123:45] that's their prerogative. [123:47] >> That's democracy. [123:48] >> That's democracy. Good luck, sir. Thank [123:50] you very much. [123:51] >> Pleasure. [123:51] >> All right.