Article summary — original
Apertus 1.5 Releases Open-Weight 8B and 70B Multimodal Models with Extended Context and Reasoning Modes
Project Apertus has released Apertus 1.5 under an Apache 2.0 license, expanding its 8B and 70B base models with early-fusion image and audio understanding, a 262,144-token context window, and an optional thinking mode for complex reasoning.
Apertus 1.5 updates the 8B and 70B models by adding 4 trillion and 2 trillion tokens respectively of text and multimodal training data, bringing totals to 19T and 17T tokens under an Apache 2.0 license.
Multimodal input is handled via early fusion using the Emu3.5 image tokenizer and WavTokenizer, preserving standard text-only architecture speeds while generating text outputs exclusively.
The model context window was expanded fourfold to 262,144 tokens through a stepped pretraining curriculum and dedicated long-context supervised fine-tuning.
Post-training spans five stages including RL with verifiable rewards (RLVR), direct preference optimization (DPO), and charter alignment (SDPO).
Benchmark evaluations are mapped to the Every Eval Ever schema with the EvalEval Coalition, satisfying 56 of 60 evaluation reporting requirements under the EU AI Act and GPAI Code of Practice.
Early-Fusion Multimodal Architecture and Pretraining
Apertus 1.5 incorporates image and audio comprehension directly through its vocabulary without adding separate vision or speech encoders. Visual inputs are discretized using the Emu3.5 tokenizer at 1,024 tokens per 512×512 image, and audio is encoded via WavTokenizer at 40 tokens per second. Training is executed at standard text-only speeds, and model generation remains text-only. Pretraining continued from Apertus 1.0 across four stages: unpaired data, paired captions and transcripts, a cooldown stage rich in mathematics and code, and progressive context extension up to 262,144 tokens. Over half of all training tokens remained text-only to preserve foundational linguistic capabilities, utilizing datasets like FineWeb2-HQ+, FinePDFs, and Nemotron-CC under open-license and retroactive robots.txt constraints.
Five-Stage Post-Training Pipeline
Post-training follows a structured five-stage regimen: supervised fine-tuning (SFT), long-context SFT, reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), direct preference optimization (DPO), and charter alignment (SDPO). The initial SFT stage incorporates 3.7 million text samples alongside multimodal data, restricting reasoning traces to prompts the model cannot resolve without them and constraining tool usage to execution-verified trajectories. Subsequent long-context SFT at 262k tokens recovers long-context performance degraded by short-context fine-tuning. RLVR applies approximately 350,000 math, code, multilingual, instruction-following, and vision tasks with thinking modes toggled on and off. Finally, DPO and SDPO align output preferences and adhere to the Apertus Charter using judge-scored pairings and self-distillation.
Evaluation Performance and Governance Reporting
Evaluations combined the MLLM-eval-suite with an lm-evaluation-harness fork to test vision, audio, reasoning, and tool use. The 8B model outperformed similarly sized open-weight models on instruction-following and multilingual tasks, while thinking mode improved performance on reasoning benchmarks such as AIME. On the Last Translation Benchmark, Apertus 1.5 8B matched GPT-OSS-20B and exceeded Claude Haiku 4.5 and Google Translate, while also matching leading open-weight models on Swiss Legal tasks. To ensure reproducibility, results are published in the Every Eval Ever (EEE) format via Hugging Face Community Evals in partnership with EvalEval, capturing 56 of 60 evaluation-reporting elements mandated by EU AI Act Article 55 and the GPAI Code of Practice.
Ecosystem Integrations and Apertus 2.0 Roadmap
Apertus 1.5 has been integrated into end-user applications including Proton Lumo and Infomaniak Euria, with API developer access supported by Swisscom, Infomaniak, and Phoeniqs. Full training recipes, intermediate checkpoints for base, SFT, RLVR, and DPO stages, and data mixtures are publicly released. Project Apertus also announced plans for Apertus 2.0, which will introduce a sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture of roughly 600 billion parameters focusing on autonomous agents, advanced mathematics, and programming.
Saved original article
Our latest release, Apertus 1.5, extends the 8B and 70B Apertus 1.0 models with image/audio understanding, an optional thinking mode, a four times longer context window, improved instruction-following, and better tool use. The updated
8B and 70B model weights
were released to Hugging Face on July 24, 2026 under an Apache 2.0 license. Further details are now available from the project
Technical Report
, and summarized here.
Apertus 1.5 is a continued pretraining of the first generation model: adding 4 trillion tokens of text and multimodal training data to the 8B model and 2 trillion tokens to the 70B model, for a total of 19T and 17T, respectively. As with every Apertus release, the models are fully open: open
weights
, open
data
, open
values
, and full training
details
.
Key Enhancements
Native Multimodal Understanding:
Apertus 1.5 accepts images and audio alongside text, bringing documents, diagrams, and photos into the conversation. The models can also process spoken language, though this remains experimental.
Thinking Mode:
The models can be switched into a thinking mode to reason about the input before answering, which improves performance on reasoning problems.
Long Context:
The context window grows to 262,144 tokens, a 4x increase over Apertus 1.0.
Improved Instruction-Following:
Better instruction adherence than Apertus 1.0 gives more predictable and accurate responses.
Improved Tool Use:
The models are trained for better tool integration, allowing more effective use of external tools and APIs.
Open Values:
Stronger adherence to the Apertus Charter, which brings transparency to the model’s values and principles.
Training Process
The full Apertus 1.5 training pipeline
Multimodality Through the Tokenizer
We introduce multimodality in v1.5 models in an early-fusion manner, where images and audio enter Apertus as discrete tokens in the same sequence with text tokens, instead of using a separate vision encoder. Images are tokenized with the
Emu3.5
tokenizer (a 512×512 image becomes 1,024 tokens) and audio with
WavTokenizer
(40 tokens per second). We only extend the vocabulary, so the architecture stays unchanged and training runs at text-only speed. The models understand images and audio but generate only text.
Pre-Training
Starting from Apertus 1.0, we continue pretraining in four stages:
Unpaired:
text plus standalone images and audio, so the model learns the new modalities.
Paired:
image–caption and audio–transcript pairs, so it aligns them with language.
Cooldown:
higher-quality data with more math and code.
Long context:
the window grows step by step from 8k to 262k tokens.
Overall, more than half of the training tokens are text-only, which preserves the language abilities of Apertus 1.0. The text data is refreshed with sources such as
FineWeb2-HQ+
, FinePDFs, and Nemotron-CC. All new data, multimodal included, meets the same bar as before: publicly available, permissively licensed, and with robots.txt opt-outs respected retroactively. Every source is listed in
apertus-data-transparency
.
Post-Training
Post-training runs in five stages:
SFT → long-context SFT → RL → DPO → charter alignment (SDPO)
.
SFT
on 3.7M text samples plus image and speech data. Reasoning traces are added only to prompts the model can't already solve without them. Tool-use data is restricted to execution-verified trajectories. We release the
text SFT mix
we used on Hugging Face.
Long-context SFT
at the full 262k window restores the long-context ability that short-context SFT erodes.
RL with verifiable rewards (RLVR)
on about 350k math, code, instruction-following, multilingual, and vision prompts, mixing thinking on and off.
DPO
with judge-scored preference pairs improves chat quality, tool use, and safety. We release the
preference pool
and
training pairs
.
SDPO
aligns the model with the
Apertus Charter
through judge feedback and self-distillation.
Evaluation Results
Alongside the extended model capabilities, we also significantly expanded the scope of evaluations. Beyond the existing text-based evaluations used for Apertus 1.0, we added multimodal evaluations (image & audio), and thinking-mode evaluations.
The multimodal evaluations are done through
MLLM-eval-suite
pipeline, merging two major multimodal evaluation frameworks
lmms-eval
and
VLMEvalKit
. We also added a series of text-based benchmarks, as well as extended benchmarking for translation and multilingual capabilities, safety, and tool use. These can be found in our post-training
evaluation repository
, based on
lm-evaluation-harness fork
.
While still trailing frontier open-weight models, the new release has also significantly improved performance in coding and instruction following capabilities with Apertus 1.5 8B outperforming similarly sized open-weight models on IF and multilingual tasks. Thinking further improves performance on challenging reasoning-heavy benchmarks like AIME. The multimodal performance of the model is closer to
Gemma 4 12B
and other current open-weight models. Apertus 1.5 multimodal performance is competitive in spatial understanding among open-weight models and document/chart understanding among open-source models.
We also thank our collaborators and external evaluators for their help with efficient benchmarking of Apertus capabilities. In particular, Apertus 1.5 shows strong performance on Swiss Legal tasks, being on par with leading open-weight models (
blog
,
code
). Additionally, on Last Translation Benchmark, Apertus 1.5 8B presents machine translation capabilities which match
GPT-OSS-20B
and outperform models like
Claude Haiku 4.5
or
Google Translate
(
leaderboard
,
paper
).
Evaluation Cards: Apertus ❤️ EvalEval
Apertus collaborates with the
EvalEval Coalition
to ensure fully transparent and reproducible benchmarking. We publish the Apertus 1.5 results in the
Every Eval Ever (EEE)
schema, a shared format that records not only scores, but also who ran the evaluation, how the model was accessed, the generation settings, and how each metric should be interpreted: details that are routinely missing from leaderboards and that often explain why similar-looking scores differ.
The results are shown in the Eval Card below, which combines the run data with benchmark and model metadata into one interpretable record, and are also available through
Hugging Face Community Evals
. This is the same infrastructure the
UK AI Security Institute uses to publish its evaluations openly
. Since our text evaluations run on our public fork of lm-evaluation-harness, which EEE supports with a dedicated converter, anyone can rerun them and compare their numbers against ours under identical settings.
Structured evaluation reporting also matters beyond research. EvalEval has
mapped Evaluation Cards to AI governance requirements
, including Article 55 of the EU AI Act and the GPAI Code of Practice, and found that the EEE schema can represent 56 of the 60 evaluation-reporting elements these frameworks call for. This fits how we already release Apertus: alongside the models, we publish a
Public Summary
of Training Content and, voluntarily, a
Code of Practice
document. Machine-readable evaluation records are a natural next step: making it easier for regulators, deployers, and researchers to find, interpret, and compare the evidence behind a model.
We are committed to promoting reproducible and transparent evaluation through Eval Cards and the EEE schema, and encourage other model developers to report their results in the same way, so that scores can be compared across models and organizations.
Apertus 1.5 Reproducibility
All recipes, ablations, and data mixtures are documented in the
Technical Report
. We aim to popularize open model development by making the v1.5 training process public and accessible. Intermediate checkpoints are hosted in our
Apertus 1.5 Hugging Face collection
, including the base weights, SFT, RLVR and DPO, as well as our curated training data mixes/custom datasets in
Apertus 1.5 datasets collection
. Sharing them allows researchers to investigate how each stage changes the model behavior.
The report covers numerous ablations on the effect of post-training data in different stages, where we observed that the multimodal data mixed in together with text data during SFT helps improve across all modalities. We also find that the benefits of multimodal reasoning traces survive the subsequent text-only reinforcement learning: starting from an SFT checkpoint trained with multimodal traces, RL improves mathematics more than when starting from a text-only checkpoint, and the advantage on reasoning tasks persists throughout training.
Models
8B
70B
Pre-training (long-context base)
Apertus-v1.5-8B-base
Apertus-v1.5-70B-base
Supervised finetuning (SFT)
Apertus-v1.5-8B-SFT
Apertus-v1.5-70B-SFT
Reinforcement learning (RLVR)
Apertus-v1.5-8B-RLVR
Apertus-v1.5-70B-RLVR
Preference alignment (DPO)
Apertus-v1.5-8B-DPO
Apertus-v1.5-70B
(final)
Charter alignment (SDPO)
Apertus-v1.5-8B
(final)
–
Stage
Data
Code / recipe
Pre-training: Stages 1–2
(unpaired, paired)
All sources with versions and licenses in
apertus-data-transparency
; vision and audio processing recipes in
multimodal-data
Megatron-LM
, launch scripts in
pretrain-code
,
apertus-omni-tokenizer
,
benchmark-image-tokenizer
,
benchmark-audio-tokenizer
(incl. interleaved speech–text builder)
Pre-training: Stage 3
(cooldown)
apertus-data-transparency
; curated image datasets
NASA
,
Our World in Data
,
Smithsonian
,
swisstopo
Megatron-LM
, launch scripts in
pretrain-code
Long-context extension
apertus-data-transparency
; synthetic long-context tasks in
LongContextQA
Megatron-LM
, launch scripts in
pretrain-code
SFT
Apertus-v1.5-SFT-mix
(multimodal SFT mix listed in the report)
posttraining-data
,
Megatron-LM
(SFT launch scripts)
Long-context SFT
Subsets of the SFT mix (listed in the report), plus
LongContextQA
tasks
Megatron-LM
RL (RLVR)
Mixture listed in the report
verl
,
verl-recipe
DPO
Apertus-v1.5-Preference-Pool
(annotated completions),
Apertus-v1.5-Preference-Data
(pairs)
posttraining
,
verl
SDPO
(charter alignment, 8B only)
gretelai/gretel-safety-alignment-en-v1
self-distillation
Model Availability
Proton Lumo
and
Infomaniak Euria
are two widely used apps that have recently integrated Apertus 1.5. These deployments are linked in the
Community Showcase
among others - see this
discussion thread
for a preview.
Access to Apertus 1.5 in the form of an API for developers has been announced by a range of providers, including
Swisscom
,
Infomaniak
,
Phoeniqs
, and other companies listed in our
General Availability guide
. The report also provides details on how we work with external evaluators to test and prepare the models.
Technical instructions for running the models are in the model cards of the Apertus releases on Hugging Face and in our
Quickstart guide
.
How to Get Involved
Thank you for reading this blog post and being part of our community! We just celebrated five million downloads in our Hugging Face analytics 🤗 and are not slowing down. At the recent
AI+X Summit
in Zurich, our team announced the roadmap for
Apertus 2.0
: sparse/MoE architecture, ~600B total parameters, extended training schedule, with agents, mathematics and coding as priorities.
In summary: we invite you to read our report, download the models, explore the intermediate checkpoints, finetune the weights, and reproduce our evaluations. Questions that are not already covered in
our publications
or
website FAQ
are always welcome, and we would also love to hear which topics would be most useful to the community for future deep dives.
If you build with or use Apertus, please fill out the
Showcase form
, and reach out through the options on our
Contact page
. We are looking forward to highlighting more work, learning what you are building, and hearing how Apertus can be improved!
Citation
Project Apertus, et al. “Apertus 1.5: From Open Text Models to Open Multimodal Reasoners.” arXiv:2610.15542. Preprint, arXiv, October 11, 2026.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.15542
.
@misc{apertus2026apertus15opentext,
title={Apertus 1.5: From Open Text Models to Open Multimodal Reasoners},
author={Project Apertus and Yixuan Xu and Yassine Turki and Vinko Sabolčec and Valentina Pyatkin and Tommy Chu and Sven Najem-Meyer and Sean F. Carroll and Robert Smith and Raphael Kreft and Oscar Alessandro Tazza and Oleg Lavrovsky and Nicola Irmiger and Matteo Santelmo and Marian Schneider and Juan García Giraldo and Hanna Yukhymenko and Eduard Ďurech and Davit Melikidze and Dani Tamayo and Bettina Messmer and Aryan Ahadinia and Anunay Yadav and Allen Huang and Ahmad Fraij and Alessandro Bombarda and Alex Padula and Alexander Hägele and Alexander Sternfeld and Anna Hedström and Anna Kosovskaia and Arthur Wuhrmann and Arundhati Balasubramaniam and Badr Al Mahouri and Barna Pasztor and Bartosz Szostakiewicz and Bich Ngoc Doan and Bryan Schmid and Burak Sezen and Camille Challier and Clément Charmillot and Dana Shayakhmetova and Daniel Perruchoud and David Brüggemann and David Isztl and Elia Palme and Emma Anastassova and Fabian Bösch and Faruk Zahiragić and Fawzi Roberto Mohamed and Fiona Panicali and Florian Kolly and Flynn Guerra and Francesco Monti and Frederike Lübeck and Gennaro Oliva and Haofeng Yang and Haoliang Shang and Helen El Khoury and Henrique Mendonça and Jannis Vamvas and Jérome Landolt and Jessica Lam and Jingchun Xiao and Jonathan Coles and Joshua Oyebanji and Khanh Nguyen and Konstantinos Pitas and Lasse B. Strand and Li Mi and Loïc Deslarzes and Lorenzo Baggi and Lorenzo Noci and Luca Baumann and Luca Sartori and Lukas Drescher and Marco De Negri and Marco Passerini and Mark Klein and Marko Stojanovic and Martin Majsec and Matin Ansaripour and Mattea Busato and Mauro Pellonara and Max Neuwinger and Michael Graber and Michal Tešnar and Michelle Wastl and Miguel Gila and Mikolaj Boronski and Morgane Magnin and Moritz Reihs and Mukhammadali Sayfiddinov and Nathan Ranchin and Nicolas Cuveillier and Oscar Wohlfahrt and Qianqian Zou and Rada Kamysheva and Rita Sevastjanova and Roman Machacek and Sebastian Keller and Simon Matrenok and Simon Pierre and Stefano Schuppli and Suei-Wen Chen and Szabina Horváth-Mikulas and Taliesin Perez and Thilo Spinner and Thomas Kleine Buening and Tim Robinson and Tymoteusz Kwiecinski and Vilém Zouhar and Vinzenz Thoma and Xiaozhe Yao and Yannick Metz and Yuhei Fukuhara and Yusif Askari and Zixuan Chen and Alexander Ilic and Ana Klimovic and Andreas Krause and Andrei Kucharavy and Elliott Ash and Joost VandeVondele and Martin Rajman and Mennatallah El-Assady and Thomas Schulthess and Timo Kehrer and Torsten Hoefler and Antoine Bosselut and Martin Jaggi and Imanol Schlag},
year={2026},
eprint={2610.15542},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15542},
}